Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

12 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2011

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies [Abstract]

SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Nature of Business

Since its formation, the Company has been involved in the acquisition and management of fee mineral acreage and the exploration for, and development of, oil and natural gas properties, principally involving drilling wells located on the Company’s mineral acreage. Panhandle’s mineral properties and other oil and natural gas interests are all located in the United States, primarily in Arkansas, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Texas. The Company is not the operator of any wells. The Company’s oil and natural gas production is from interests in 5,107 wells located principally in Oklahoma. Approximately 79% of oil and natural gas revenues are derived from the sale of natural gas. Substantially all the Company’s oil and natural gas production is sold through the operators of the wells. The Company from time to time disposes of certain non-material, non-core or small-interest oil and natural gas properties as a normal course of business.

Use of Estimates

Preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts and disclosures reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Of these estimates and assumptions, management considers the estimation of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves to be the most significant. These estimates affect the unaudited standardized measure disclosures, as well as depreciation, depletion and amortization (DD&A) and impairment calculations. On an annual basis, with a limited scope semi-annual update, the Company’s Independent Consulting Petroleum Engineer, with assistance from the Company, prepares estimates of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves based on available geologic and seismic data, reservoir pressure data, core analysis reports, well logs, analogous reservoir performance history, production data and other available sources of engineering, geological and geophysical information. For DD&A purposes, and as required by the guidelines and definitions established by the SEC, the 2010 and 2011 reserve estimates were based on average individual product prices during the 12-month period prior to September 30, 2010 and 2011, determined as an unweighted arithmetic average of the first-day-of-the-month price for each month within such period, unless prices were defined by contractual arrangements, excluding escalations based upon future conditions. Oil and natural gas prices used for the 2009 estimate were based on the September 30 price of that year. For impairment purposes, projected future crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices as estimated by management are used. Crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids prices are volatile and largely affected by worldwide production and consumption and are outside the control of management. Projected future crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids pricing assumptions are used by management to prepare estimates of crude oil, natural gas and natural gas liquids reserves used in formulating management’s overall operating decisions.

The Company does not operate its oil and natural gas properties and, therefore, receives actual oil and natural gas sales volumes and prices (in the normal course of business) over a month later than the information is available to the operators of the wells. This being the case, on many of these wells, the most current available production data is gathered from the appropriate operators, and oil and natural gas index prices local to each well are used to estimate the accrual of revenue on these wells. Timely obtaining production data on all other wells from the operators is not feasible; therefore, the Company utilizes past production receipts and estimated sales price information to estimate its accrual of revenue on all other wells each quarter. The oil and natural gas sales revenue accrual can be impacted by many variables including rapid production decline rates, production curtailments by operators, the shut-in of wells with mechanical problems and rapidly changing market prices for oil and natural gas. These variables could lead to an over or under accrual of oil and natural gas sales at the end of any particular quarter. Based on past history, the Company’s estimated accrual has been materially accurate.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents consist of all demand deposits and funds invested in short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less.

Oil and Natural Gas (and associated natural gas liquids) Sales and Natural Gas Imbalances

The Company sells oil and natural gas to various customers, recognizing revenues as oil and natural gas is produced and sold. Charges for compression, marketing, gathering and transportation of natural gas are included in lease operating expenses and production taxes.

The Company uses the sales method of accounting for natural gas imbalances in those circumstances where it has underproduced or overproduced its ownership percentage in a property. Under this method, a receivable or liability is recorded to the extent that an underproduced or overproduced position in a reservoir cannot be recouped through the production of remaining reserves. At September 30, 2011 and 2010, the Company had no material natural gas imbalances.

Concentration of Credit Risk

Substantially all of the Company’s accounts receivable are due from purchasers of oil and natural gas or operators of the oil and natural gas properties. Oil and natural gas sales receivables are generally unsecured.

On July 22, 2008, SemGroup, L.P. and certain subsidiaries (SemGroup) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. As a result of the filing, the Company reserved $591,258 of receivables as uncollectible for substantially all of the sales of crude oil through various well operators to SemGroup during the period June 1, 2008 through July 22, 2008. The amount reserved was charged to bad debt expense in 2008. On October 28, 2009, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court confirmed the Fourth Amended Joint Plan of Affiliated Debtors, which set forth various settlement details for producers and interest owners. Based on the details of the plan, discussion with impacted operators and management’s judgment, the Company lowered the reserve for doubtful accounts to $405,129 at September 30, 2009, resulting in $186,129 of bad debt recovery. The bankruptcy settlements were received during 2010 and early 2011 and the receivables and allowance for doubtful accounts were completely relieved as of March 31, 2011.

Derivative contracts entered into by the Company are also unsecured.

Oil and Natural Gas Producing Activities

The Company follows the successful efforts method of accounting for oil and natural gas producing activities. Intangible drilling and other costs of successful wells and development dry holes are capitalized and amortized. The costs of exploratory wells are initially capitalized, but charged against income if and when the well is determined to be nonproductive. Oil and natural gas mineral and leasehold costs are capitalized when incurred.

Non-producing oil and natural gas leases are assessed for impairment on a property-by-property basis for individually significant balances and on an aggregate basis for individually insignificant balances. If the assessment indicates an impairment, a loss is recognized by providing a valuation allowance at the level at which impairment was assessed. The impairment assessment is affected by economic factors such as the results of exploration activities, commodity price outlooks, remaining lease terms and potential shifts in business strategy employed by management. In the case of individually insignificant balances, the amount of the impairment loss recognized is determined by amortizing the portion of these properties’ costs, which the Company believes will not be transferred to proved properties over the remaining lives of the leases. Impairment loss is charged to exploration costs when recognized. As of September 30, 2011, the remaining carrying cost of non-producing oil and natural gas leases was $580,893.

It is common business practice in the petroleum industry for drilling costs to be prepaid before spudding a well. The Company frequently fulfills these prepayment requirements with cash payments, but at times will utilize letters of credit to meet these obligations. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had outstanding letters of credit totaling $57,051 that expired in November 2010. As of September 30, 2011, the Company had no outstanding letters of credit.

Derivatives

The Company entered into oil costless collar contracts, natural gas fixed swap contracts and natural gas basis protection swaps. These instruments were intended to reduce the Company’s exposure to short-term fluctuations in the price of oil and natural gas. Collar contracts set a fixed floor price and a fixed ceiling price and provide payments to the Company if the index price falls below the floor or require payments by the Company if the index price rises above the ceiling. Fixed swap contracts set a fixed price and provide payments to the Company if the index price is below the fixed price, or require payments by the Company if the index price is above the fixed price. Basis protection swaps are derivatives that guarantee a price differential to NYMEX for natural gas from a specified delivery point (CEGT and PEPL currently). The Company receives a payment from the counterparty if the price differential is greater than the agreed terms of the contract and pays the counterparty if the price differential is less than the agreed terms of the contract. These contracts cover only a portion of the Company’s oil and natural gas production and provide only partial price protection against declines in oil and natural gas prices. These derivative instruments expose the Company to risk of financial loss and may limit the benefit of future increases in prices. All of the Company’s derivative contracts are with Bank of Oklahoma and are unsecured. The derivative instruments have settled or will settle based on the prices below, which are adjusted for location differentials and tied to certain pipelines in Oklahoma.

Derivative contracts in place as of September 30, 2010

(prices below reflect the Company’s net price from the listed Oklahoma pipelines)

Contract period	Production volume covered per month	Indexed (1) Pipeline	Fixed price
Fixed price swaps
January – December, 2010	100,000 Mmbtu	CEGT	$	5.015
January – December, 2010	50,000 Mmbtu	CEGT	$	5.050
January – December, 2010	100,000 Mmbtu	PEPL	$	5.570
January – December, 2010	50,000 Mmbtu	PEPL	$	5.560
Basis protection swaps
January – December, 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	CEGT		NYMEX -$.27
January – December, 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	CEGT		NYMEX -$.27
January – December, 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	PEPL		NYMEX -$.26
January – December, 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	PEPL		NYMEX -$.27
January – December, 2012	50,000 Mmbtu	CEGT		NYMEX -$.29
January – December, 2012	40,000 Mmbtu	CEGT		NYMEX -$.30
January – December, 2012	50,000 Mmbtu	PEPL		NYMEX -$.29
January – December, 2012	50,000 Mmbtu	PEPL		NYMEX -$.30

(1) CEGT – Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission’s East pipeline in Oklahoma

PEPL – Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company’s Texas/Oklahoma mainline

Derivative contracts in place as of September 30, 2011

(prices below reflect the Company’s net price from the listed Oklahoma pipelines)

Contract period	Production volume covered per month	Indexed (1) Pipeline	Fixed price
Natural gas fixed price swaps
April – October 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	NYMEX Henry Hub	$	4.65
April – October 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	NYMEX Henry Hub	$	4.65
April – October 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	NYMEX Henry Hub	$	4.70
April – October 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	NYMEX Henry Hub	$	4.75
May – October 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	NYMEX Henry Hub	$	4.50
May – October 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	NYMEX Henry Hub	$	4.60
June – October 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	NYMEX Henry Hub	$	4.63
Natural gas basis protection swaps
January – December 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	CEGT		NYMEX -$.27
January – December 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	CEGT		NYMEX -$.27
January – December 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	PEPL		NYMEX -$.26
January – December 2011	50,000 Mmbtu	PEPL		NYMEX -$.27
January – December 2011	70,000 Mmbtu	PEPL		NYMEX -$.36
January – December 2012	50,000 Mmbtu	CEGT		NYMEX -$.29
January – December 2012	40,000 Mmbtu	CEGT		NYMEX -$.30
January – December 2012	50,000 Mmbtu	PEPL		NYMEX -$.29
January – December 2012	50,000 Mmbtu	PEPL		NYMEX -$.30
Oil costless collars
April – December 2011	5,000 Bbls	NYMEX WTI		$100 floor/$112 ceiling

(1) CEGT – Centerpoint Energy Gas Transmission’s East pipeline in Oklahoma

PEPL – Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company’s Texas/Oklahoma mainline

While the Company believes that its derivative contracts are effective in achieving the risk management objective for which they were intended, the Company has elected not to complete the documentation requirements necessary to permit these derivative contracts to be accounted for as cash flow hedges. The Company’s fair value of derivative contracts was a net asset of $215,940 as of September 30, 2011, and an asset of $1,620,326 as of September 30, 2010. Realized and unrealized gains and (losses) are scheduled below:

Gains (losses) on natural gas derivative contracts	9/30/2011			Fiscal year ended 9/30/2010		9/30/2009
Realized	$	2,138,685		$	2,209,900	$	2,497,800
Increase (decrease) in fair value		(1,404,386	)		4,133,761		(3,159,628	)
Total	$	734,299		$	6,343,661	$	(661,828	)

To the extent that a legal offset exists, the Company nets the fair value of its derivative contracts with the same counterparty in the accompanying balance sheets. The following table summarizes the Company’s derivative contracts as of September 30, 2011, and September 30, 2010:

	$1,620,326		$1,620,326		$1,620,326
	Balance Sheet Location	9/30/2011 Fair Value		9/30/2010 Fair Value
Asset Derivatives:
Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments:
Commodity contracts	Short-term derivative contracts	$	269,329	$	1,481,527
Commodity contracts	Long-term derivative contracts		—		138,799
Total Asset Derivatives (a)		$	269,329	$	1,620,326
Liability Derivatives:
Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments:
Commodity contracts	Short-term derivative contracts	$	—	$	—
Commodity contracts	Long-term derivative contracts		53,389		—
Total Liability Derivatives (a)		$	53,389	$	—

(a) See Fair Value Measurements section for further disclosures regarding fair value of financial instruments.

The fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities is adjusted for credit risk, only if the impact is deemed material. The impact of credit risk was immaterial for all periods presented.

Fair Value Measurements

Accounting literature has established a framework for measuring fair value which defines fair value as the amount that would be received from the sale of an asset or paid for the transfer of a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants, i.e., an exit price. To estimate an exit price, a three-level hierarchy is used. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs, which refer broadly to assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or a liability, into three levels. Level 1 inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include the following: (i) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (ii) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; (iii) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability; or (iv) inputs that are derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data by correlation or other means. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the financial asset or liability. Counterparty quotes are generally assessed as a Level 3 input.

The following table provides fair value measurement information for financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

	Fair Value Measurement at September 30, 2011
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Fair Value
Financial Assets (Liabilities):
Derivative Contracts – Swaps	$	—	$	(77,907	)	$	—	$	(77,907	)
Derivative Contracts – Collars	$	—	$	—		$	293,847	$	293,847
	Fair Value Measurement at September 30, 2010
	Quoted Prices in Active Markets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)			Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Total Fair Value
Financial Assets (Liabilities):
Derivative Contracts – Swaps	$	—	$	1,620,326		$	—	$	1,620,326

Level 2 – Market Approach – The fair values of the Company’s natural gas swaps are based on a third-party pricing model which utilizes inputs that are either readily available in the public market, such as natural gas curves, or can be corroborated from active markets. These values are based upon, among other things, future prices and time to maturity. These values are then compared to the values given by our counterparties for reasonableness.

Level 3 – The fair values of the Company’s oil collar contracts are based on a pricing model which utilizes inputs that are unobservable or not readily available in the public market. These values are based upon, among other things, future prices, volatility and time to maturity. These values are then compared to the values given by our counterparties for reasonableness.

A reconciliation of the Company’s assets classified as Level 3 measurements is presented below.

	Derivatives
Balance of Level 3 as of October 1, 2010	$	—
Total gains or (losses) – realized and unrealized:
Included in earnings		393,992
Included in other comprehensive income (loss)		—
Purchases, issuances and settlements		(100,145	)
Transfers in and out of Level 3		—
Balance of Level 3 as of September 30, 2011	$	293,847

The following table presents impairments associated with certain assets that have been measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

	Year Ended September 30,
	2011				2010
	Fair Value		Impairment		Fair Value		Impairment
Producing Properties	$	1,811,709	$	1,728,162	$	313,248	$	605,615	(a)

(a) At the end of each quarter, the Company assessed the carrying value of its producing properties for impairment. This assessment utilized estimates of future cash flows. Significant judgments and assumptions in these assessments include estimates of future oil and natural gas prices using a forward NYMEX curve adjusted for locational basis differentials, drilling plans, expected capital costs and an applicable discount rate commensurate with risk of the underlying cash flow estimates. These assessments identified certain properties with carrying value in excess of their calculated fair values. As a result, the Company recorded $1,728,162 and $605,615 in impairment charges during 2011 and 2010.

Fair Values of Financial Instruments

The carrying amounts reported in the balance sheets for cash and cash equivalents, receivables, derivative contracts, refundable income taxes, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values due to the short maturity of these instruments. The fair value of Company’s debt approximates its carrying amount due to the interest rates on the Company’s revolving line of credit being rates, which are approximately equivalent to market rates for similar type debt based on the Company’s credit worthiness.

Depreciation, Depletion, Amortization and Impairment

Depreciation, depletion and amortization of the costs of producing oil and natural gas properties are generally computed using the units of production method primarily on a separate property basis using proved or proved developed reserves, as applicable, as estimated by the Company’s Independent Consulting Petroleum Engineer. Depreciation of furniture and fixtures is computed using the straight-line method over estimated productive lives of five to eight years.

Non-producing oil and natural gas properties include non-producing minerals, which had a net book value of $5,215,239 and $4,346,191 at September 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, consisting of perpetual ownership of mineral interests in several states, with 92% of the acreage in Arkansas, New Mexico, North Dakota, Oklahoma and Texas. As mentioned, these mineral rights are perpetual and have been accumulated over the 85-year life of the Company. There are approximately 198,570 net acres of non-producing minerals in more than 6,900 tracts owned by the Company. An average tract contains approximately 29 acres, and the average cost per acre is $39. Since inception, the Company has continually generated an interest in several thousand oil and natural gas wells using its ownership of the fee mineral acres as an ownership basis. There continues to be significant drilling activity each year on these mineral interests. Non-producing minerals are being amortized straight-line over a 33-year period. These assets are considered a long-term investment by the Company, as they do not expire (as do oil and natural gas leases). Given the above, it was concluded that a long-term amortization was appropriate and that 33 years, based on past history and experience, was an appropriate period. Due to the fact that the minerals consist of a large number of properties, whose costs are not individually significant, and because virtually all are in the Company’s core operating areas, the minerals are being amortized on an aggregate basis.

The Company recognizes impairment losses for long-lived assets when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows are not sufficient to recover the assets’ carrying amount. The impairment loss is measured by comparing the fair value of the asset to its carrying amount. Fair values are based on discounted cash flow as estimated by the Company’s Independent Consulting Petroleum Engineer. The Company’s estimate of fair value of its oil and natural gas properties at September 30, 2011, is based on the best information available as of that date, including estimates of forward oil and natural gas prices and costs. The Company’s oil and natural gas properties were reviewed for impairment on a field-by-field basis, resulting in the recognition of impairment provisions of $1,728,162, $605,615 and $2,464,520 respectively, for 2011, 2010 and 2009. A significant reduction in oil and natural gas prices or a decline in reserve volumes would likely lead to additional impairment in future periods that may be material to the Company.

Capitalized Interest

During 2011, 2010 and 2009, interest of $0, $104,100 and $455,516, respectively, was included in the Company’s capital expenditures. Interest of $0, $60,912 and $6,946, respectively, was charged to expense during those periods. Interest is capitalized using a weighted average interest rate based on the Company’s outstanding borrowings. These capitalized costs are included with intangible drilling costs and amortized using units of production method.

Investments

Insignificant investments in partnerships and limited liability companies (LLC) that maintain specific ownership accounts for each investor and where the Company holds an interest of five percent or greater, but does not have control of the partnership or LLC, are accounted for using the equity method of accounting.

Asset Retirement Obligations

The Company owns interests in oil and natural gas properties, which may require expenditures to plug and abandon the wells when the oil and natural gas reserves in the wells are depleted. The fair value of legal obligations to retire and remove long-lived assets is recorded in the period in which the obligation is incurred (typically when the asset is installed at the production location). When the liability is initially recorded, this cost is capitalized by increasing the carrying amount of the related properties and equipment. Over time the liability is increased for the change in its present value, and the capitalized cost in properties and equipment is depreciated over the useful life of the remaining asset. The Company does not have any assets restricted for the purpose of settling the plugging liabilities.

The following table shows the activity for the years ended September 30, 2011 and 2010, relating to the Company’s retirement obligation for plugging liability:

	2011			2010
Plugging Liability as of beginning of the year	$	1,730,369		$	1,620,225
Accretion of Discount		109,198			106,093
New Wells Placed on Production		28,624			20,476
Wells Sold or Plugged		(24,316	)		(16,425	)
Plugging Liability as of end of the year	$	1,843,875		$	1,730,369

Environmental Costs

As the Company is directly involved in the extraction and use of natural resources, it is subject to various federal, state and local provisions regarding environmental and ecological matters. Compliance with these laws may necessitate significant capital outlays; however, to date the Company’s cost of compliance has been insignificant. The Company does not believe the existence of current environmental laws or interpretations thereof will materially hinder or adversely affect the Company’s business operations; however, there can be no assurances of future effects on the Company of new laws or interpretations thereof. Since the Company does not operate any wells where it owns an interest, actual compliance with environmental laws is controlled by others, with Panhandle being responsible for its proportionate share of the costs involved. Panhandle carries liability insurance and pollution control coverage. However, all risks are not insured due to the availability and cost of insurance.

Environmental liabilities, which historically have not been material, are recognized when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of that loss is reasonably estimable. Environmental liabilities, when accrued, are based upon estimates of expected future costs. At September 30, 2011 and 2010, there were no such costs accrued.

Earnings (Loss) Per Share of Common Stock

Earnings (loss) per share is calculated using net income (loss) divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, including unissued, vested directors’ shares during the period. The Company’s restricted stock awards are not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation.

Share-based Compensation

The Company recognizes current compensation costs for its Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors (the “Plan”). Compensation cost is recognized for the requisite directors’ fees as earned and unissued stock is added to each director’s account based on the fair market value of the stock at the date earned. The Plan’s structure is that upon retirement, termination or death of the director or upon a change in control of the Company, the shares accrued under the Plan will be issued to the director.

In accordance with guidance on accounting for employee stock ownership plans, the Company records as expense the fair market value of the stock at the time of contribution into its ESOP.

Restricted stock awards to certain officers during 2010 and 2011 provide for cliff vesting at the end of three or five years from the date of the awards. The fair value of the awards is ratably expensed over the vesting period in accordance with accounting guidance.

Income Taxes

The estimation of amounts of income tax to be recorded by the Company involves interpretation of complex tax laws and regulations, as well as the completion of complex calculations, including the determination of the Company’s percentage depletion deduction. Although the Company’s management believes its tax accruals are adequate, differences may occur in the future depending on the resolution of pending and new tax matters. Deferred income taxes are computed using the liability method and are provided on all temporary differences between the financial basis and the tax basis of the Company’s assets and liabilities.

The threshold for recognizing the financial statement effect of a tax position is when it is more likely than not, based on the technical merits, that the position will be sustained by a taxing authority. Recognized tax positions are initially and subsequently measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more likely than not to be realized upon ultimate settlement with a taxing authority. The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various state jurisdictions. Subject to statutory exceptions that allow for a possible extension of the assessment period, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state, and local income tax examinations for fiscal years prior to 2007.

The Company includes interest assessed by the taxing authorities in interest expense and penalties related to income taxes in general and administrative expense on its Statements of Operations. For fiscal September 30, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recorded interest and penalties of $21,000, $0 and $0, respectively. The Company does not believe it has any significant uncertain tax positions.

New Accounting Standards

In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. This update provides the option to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The Company does not believe that this will materially impact the presentation of its financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS. This update does not require additional fair value measurements and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. This update may require certain additional disclosures related to fair value measurements. We do not expect the adoption of this update will materially impact our financial statement disclosures.

Other accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB, or other standards-setting bodies, that do not require adoption until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.