UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2012
OR
o |
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 000-15760
Hardinge Inc.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
New York |
|
16-0470200 |
(State or other jurisdiction of |
|
(I.R.S. Employer |
incorporation or organization) |
|
Identification No.) |
Hardinge Inc.
One Hardinge Drive
Elmira, NY 14902
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code)
(607) 734-2281
(Registrants telephone number including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted to its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a small reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, and small reporting company in Rule 12b-2 in the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o |
|
Accelerated filer x |
|
|
|
Non-accelerated filer o |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined by Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No x
As of September 30, 2012 there were 11,690,275 shares of Common Stock of the registrant outstanding.
HARDINGE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
Page | |
|
|
| |
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011 |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 |
6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 | |
|
|
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
17 | |
|
|
|
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
25 | ||
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
27 | ||
|
|
|
|
|
28 | ||
|
|
| |
|
Certifications |
29 |
HARDINGE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
(In Thousands Except Share and Per Share Data)
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
| ||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
21,507 |
|
$ |
21,736 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
5,088 |
|
4,575 |
| ||
Accounts receivable, net |
|
50,391 |
|
65,909 |
| ||
Inventories, net |
|
134,501 |
|
122,782 |
| ||
Other current assets |
|
15,198 |
|
13,338 |
| ||
Total current assets |
|
226,685 |
|
228,340 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
70,168 |
|
68,204 |
| ||
Intangible assets, net |
|
12,503 |
|
12,765 |
| ||
Other non-current assets |
|
1,665 |
|
2,360 |
| ||
Total non-current assets |
|
84,336 |
|
83,329 |
| ||
Total assets |
|
$ |
311,021 |
|
$ |
311,669 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
32,203 |
|
$ |
36,952 |
|
Notes payable to bank |
|
14,150 |
|
12,969 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
|
28,278 |
|
25,103 |
| ||
Customer deposits |
|
14,767 |
|
18,881 |
| ||
Accrued income taxes |
|
2,517 |
|
3,480 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
2,677 |
|
2,556 |
| ||
Current portion of long-term debt |
|
2,842 |
|
1,548 |
| ||
Total current liabilities |
|
97,434 |
|
101,489 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Long-term debt |
|
5,674 |
|
7,020 |
| ||
Pension and postretirement liabilities |
|
41,381 |
|
49,310 |
| ||
Deferred income taxes |
|
3,071 |
|
2,391 |
| ||
Other liabilities |
|
4,102 |
|
4,436 |
| ||
Total non-current liabilities |
|
54,228 |
|
63,157 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 12,472,992 issued) |
|
125 |
|
125 |
| ||
Additional paid-in capital |
|
114,340 |
|
114,369 |
| ||
Retained earnings |
|
74,442 |
|
65,041 |
| ||
Treasury shares (782,717 shares at September 30, 2012 and 813,980 shares at December 31, 2011) |
|
(9,934 |
) |
(10,379 |
) | ||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(19,614 |
) |
(22,133 |
) | ||
Total shareholders equity |
|
159,359 |
|
147,023 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
|
$ |
311,021 |
|
$ |
311,669 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
HARDINGE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In Thousands Except Per Share Data)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net sales |
|
$ |
82,883 |
|
$ |
90,389 |
|
$ |
243,853 |
|
$ |
250,527 |
|
Cost of sales |
|
58,856 |
|
64,840 |
|
174,597 |
|
182,599 |
| ||||
Gross profit |
|
24,027 |
|
25,549 |
|
69,256 |
|
67,928 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
|
18,602 |
|
18,943 |
|
55,316 |
|
54,609 |
| ||||
Gain on sale of assets |
|
(13 |
) |
(5 |
) |
(27 |
) |
(23 |
) | ||||
Other expense |
|
127 |
|
284 |
|
430 |
|
389 |
| ||||
Income from operations |
|
5,311 |
|
6,327 |
|
13,537 |
|
12,953 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Interest expense |
|
246 |
|
97 |
|
655 |
|
268 |
| ||||
Interest income |
|
(44 |
) |
(45 |
) |
(95 |
) |
(132 |
) | ||||
Income before income taxes |
|
5,109 |
|
6,275 |
|
12,977 |
|
12,817 |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Income tax expense |
|
1,089 |
|
2,025 |
|
2,874 |
|
4,073 |
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
4,020 |
|
$ |
4,250 |
|
$ |
10,103 |
|
$ |
8,744 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Basic earnings per share: |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Cash dividends declared per share: |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.02 |
|
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
0.03 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
HARDINGE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
(In Thousands)
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(unaudited) |
|
(unaudited) |
| ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
4,020 |
|
$ |
4,250 |
|
$ |
10,103 |
|
$ |
8,744 |
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
1,942 |
|
(10,534 |
) |
2,519 |
|
(999 |
) | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss), net of tax |
|
$ |
5,962 |
|
$ |
(6,284 |
) |
$ |
12,622 |
|
$ |
7,745 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
HARDINGE INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In Thousands)
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
September 30, |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(Unaudited) |
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Operating activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Net income |
|
$ |
10,103 |
|
$ |
8,744 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Depreciation and amortization |
|
5,453 |
|
5,885 |
| ||
Debt issuance amortization |
|
42 |
|
78 |
| ||
Provision for deferred income taxes |
|
852 |
|
(411 |
) | ||
Gain on sale of assets |
|
(27 |
) |
(23 |
) | ||
Unrealized intercompany foreign currency transaction loss (gain) |
|
513 |
|
(748 |
) | ||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accounts receivable |
|
16,226 |
|
(11,362 |
) | ||
Inventories |
|
(10,215 |
) |
(20,485 |
) | ||
Other assets |
|
(957 |
) |
(2,700 |
) | ||
Accounts payable |
|
(5,419 |
) |
6,051 |
| ||
Customer deposits |
|
(4,207 |
) |
4,209 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
|
(6,292 |
) |
2,190 |
| ||
Accrued postretirement benefits |
|
(387 |
) |
(423 |
) | ||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
5,685 |
|
(8,995 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Investing activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital expenditures |
|
(6,167 |
) |
(13,520 |
) | ||
Proceeds on sale of assets |
|
40 |
|
908 |
| ||
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(6,127 |
) |
(12,612 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Financing activities |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Proceeds from short-term notes payable to bank |
|
49,627 |
|
20,447 |
| ||
Repayments of short-term notes payable to bank |
|
(48,800 |
) |
(9,504 |
) | ||
Proceeds from long-term debt |
|
1,106 |
|
1,616 |
| ||
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
(1,246 |
) |
(464 |
) | ||
Dividends paid |
|
(698 |
) |
(349 |
) | ||
Other financing activities |
|
8 |
|
42 |
| ||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
(3 |
) |
11,788 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
216 |
|
135 |
| ||
Net decrease in cash |
|
(229 |
) |
(9,684 |
) | ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
21,736 |
|
30,945 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
21,507 |
|
$ |
21,261 |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION
In these notes, the terms Hardinge, Company, we, us, or our mean Hardinge Inc. and its predecessors together with its subsidiaries.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements and, therefore, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the timing and amount of assets, liabilities, equity, revenue, and expenses reported and disclosed. Actual amounts could differ from our estimates. In our opinion, we have made all adjustments that are necessary for a fair presentation, and those adjustments are of a normal recurring nature unless otherwise noted. Due to differing business conditions and some seasonality, our operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected in subsequent periods or for the full year ended December 31, 2012.
NOTE 2. NET INVENTORIES
Net inventories are stated at the lower of cost (computed in accordance with the first-in, first-out method) or market. Elements of the cost include materials, labor and overhead.
Net inventories consist of the following:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||
Finished products |
|
$ |
58,751 |
|
$ |
49,476 |
|
Work-in-process |
|
32,960 |
|
28,549 |
| ||
Raw materials and purchased components |
|
42,790 |
|
44,757 |
| ||
Inventories, net |
|
$ |
134,501 |
|
$ |
122,782 |
|
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 3. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||
Land, buildings and improvements |
|
$ |
81,960 |
|
$ |
73,657 |
|
Machinery, equipment and fixtures |
|
70,699 |
|
68,303 |
| ||
Office furniture, equipment and vehicles |
|
17,169 |
|
16,990 |
| ||
Construction in progress |
|
2,745 |
|
9,212 |
| ||
|
|
172,573 |
|
168,162 |
| ||
Accumulated depreciation |
|
(102,405 |
) |
(99,958 |
) | ||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
|
$ |
70,168 |
|
$ |
68,204 |
|
NOTE 4. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The major components of intangible assets are as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||
Gross amortizable intangible assets: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land rights |
|
$ |
2,760 |
|
$ |
2,746 |
|
Patents |
|
2,994 |
|
2,965 |
| ||
Technical know-how and other |
|
5,823 |
|
5,785 |
| ||
Total gross amortizable intangible assets |
|
11,577 |
|
11,496 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Accumulated amortization: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Land rights |
|
(101 |
) |
(59 |
) | ||
Patents |
|
(2,781 |
) |
(2,704 |
) | ||
Technical know-how and other |
|
(3,710 |
) |
(3,235 |
) | ||
Total accumulated amortization |
|
(6,592 |
) |
(5,998 |
) | ||
Amortizable intangible assets, net |
|
4,985 |
|
5,498 |
| ||
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Intangible asset not subject to amortization |
|
7,518 |
|
7,267 |
| ||
Intangible assets, net |
|
$ |
12,503 |
|
$ |
12,765 |
|
Amortization expense related to these amortizable intangible assets was $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, and was $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011.
The intangible asset not subject to amortization represents the aggregate value of the trade name, trademarks and copyrights associated with the former worldwide operations of Bridgeport. We use the Bridgeport brand name on all of our machining center lines; therefore, the asset has been determined to have an indefinite useful life. The $0.2 million increase in the value of the assets from 2011 was the result of foreign currency exchange.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 5. INCOME TAXES
We continue to maintain full valuation allowances on the tax benefits of the net deferred tax assets related to tax loss carryforwards as well as other deferred tax assets for our business entities in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, and Canada.
Each quarter, we estimate our full year tax rate for jurisdictions not subject to valuation allowances based upon our most recent forecast of full year anticipated results and adjust year-to-date tax expense to reflect our full year anticipated tax rate. The rate is an estimate based upon our projected results for the year, estimated annual permanent differences, the statutory tax rates in the various jurisdictions in which we operate, and the non-recognition of tax benefits for entities with full valuation allowances. The overall effective tax rates were 21.3% and 22.1% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
The tax years 2009 to 2011 remain open to examination by the United States taxing authorities. For the other jurisdictions where we have business operations (Switzerland, United Kingdom, Taiwan, Germany, and China), the tax years between 2006 and 2011 generally remain open to routine examination by foreign taxing authorities, subject to the specific requirements of each jurisdiction.
As of September 30, 2012, we have recorded a liability for uncertain tax positions of $2.5 million (including accrued interest and penalties of $0.9 million), the majority of which would impact our effective rate if recognized. The increase to the liability for uncertain tax positions was $0.1 million and $0.2 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, and primarily consisted of accruals for interest and penalties.
NOTE 6. WARRANTIES
A reconciliation of the changes in our product warranty accrual is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||||||
Balance at the beginning of period |
|
$ |
3,477 |
|
$ |
3,995 |
|
$ |
3,800 |
|
$ |
3,297 |
|
Warranties issued |
|
820 |
|
951 |
|
2,314 |
|
3,146 |
| ||||
Warranty settlement costs |
|
(621 |
) |
(763 |
) |
(1,895 |
) |
(1,945 |
) | ||||
Changes in accruals for pre-existing warranties |
|
(186 |
) |
(322 |
) |
(737 |
) |
(823 |
) | ||||
Currency translation adjustment |
|
45 |
|
(193 |
) |
53 |
|
(7 |
) | ||||
Balance at the end of period |
|
$ |
3,535 |
|
$ |
3,668 |
|
$ |
3,535 |
|
$ |
3,668 |
|
Warranty liabilities are reported as accrued expenses on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 7. PENSION AND POST RETIREMENT PLANS
A summary of the components of net periodic pension benefit costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
304 |
|
$ |
422 |
|
$ |
931 |
|
$ |
1,203 |
|
Interest cost |
|
2,027 |
|
2,182 |
|
6,112 |
|
6,453 |
| ||||
Expected return on plan assets |
|
(2,357 |
) |
(2,575 |
) |
(7,113 |
) |
(7,592 |
) | ||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(13 |
) |
(20 |
) |
(40 |
) |
(57 |
) | ||||
Amortization of transition asset |
|
(66 |
) |
(76 |
) |
(201 |
) |
(215 |
) | ||||
Amortization of loss |
|
594 |
|
472 |
|
1,807 |
|
1,356 |
| ||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
|
$ |
489 |
|
$ |
405 |
|
$ |
1,496 |
|
$ |
1,148 |
|
A summary of the components of net postretirement benefits costs for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 is presented below.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||||||
Service cost |
|
$ |
4 |
|
$ |
5 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
Interest cost |
|
28 |
|
34 |
|
84 |
|
103 |
| ||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
|
(88 |
) |
(89 |
) |
(264 |
) |
(265 |
) | ||||
Amortization of loss |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(6 |
) |
|
| ||||
Net periodic benefit (credit) cost |
|
$ |
(58 |
) |
$ |
(50 |
) |
$ |
(174 |
) |
$ |
(148 |
) |
The Company provides defined benefit plans to eligible domestic and foreign employees. In 2010, we permanently froze the accrual of benefits under the domestic plan and one of our foreign plans. Contributions to the domestic plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 were $4.9 million and $1.7 million, respectively. Contributions to the foreign plans for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and September 30, 2011 were $1.8 million and $1.8 million, respectively. For the year ending December 31, 2012, the total expected contributions to the domestic and foreign defined benefit plans are $4.9 million and $2.4 million, respectively.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 8. FAIR VALUE AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS
Fair Value
The inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are classified into the following categories:
Level 1 Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities.
Level 3 Inputs for which significant valuation assumptions are unobservable in a market and therefore value is based on the best available data, some of which is internally developed and accounts for risk premiums that a market participant would require.
The following table presents our financial instruments measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis:
|
|
September 30, 2012 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
21,507 |
|
$ |
21,507 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
5,088 |
|
5,088 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Notes payable to bank |
|
(14,150 |
) |
|
|
(14,150 |
) |
|
| ||||
Variable interest rate debt |
|
(8,516 |
) |
|
|
(8,516 |
) |
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts, net |
|
68 |
|
|
|
68 |
|
|
| ||||
|
|
December 31, 2011 |
| ||||||||||
|
|
Total |
|
Level 1 |
|
Level 2 |
|
Level 3 |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
21,736 |
|
$ |
21,736 |
|
$ |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Restricted cash |
|
4,575 |
|
4,575 |
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Notes payable to bank |
|
(12,969 |
) |
|
|
(12,969 |
) |
|
| ||||
Variable interest rate debt |
|
(8,568 |
) |
|
|
(8,568 |
) |
|
| ||||
Foreign currency forward contracts, net |
|
(1,053 |
) |
|
|
(1,053 |
) |
|
| ||||
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are based on the fair values of identical assets in active markets. The fair value of notes payable to bank and variable interest rate debt are based on the present value of expected future cash flows. Due to the short period to maturity or the nature of the underlying liability, the fair value of notes payable to bank and variable interest rate debt approximates their respective carrying amounts. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is measured using internal models based on observable market inputs such as spot and forward rates.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2012
Derivative Instruments
We utilize foreign currency forward contracts to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies as well as on forecasted transactions denominated in foreign currencies. These contracts are considered derivative instruments and are recognized as either assets or liabilities and measured at fair value.
For contracts that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the gain or loss on the contracts is reported as a component of other comprehensive income (OCI). When the hedged transaction affects earnings, the gain or loss is reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI) into Sales or Cost of sales line items on the Consolidated Statements of Operations based on the underlying exposure. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the amount of net gain on these contracts was $0.1 million, compared to a net loss of $2.1 million recorded in OCI for the three months ended September 30, 2011. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we recorded a net gain of $0.5 million into OCI related to these contracts, compared to a net loss of $2.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2011. As of September 30, 2012, we expect that $0.1 million loss will be reclassified from AOCI into earnings in the next 12 months.
Notional amounts and unrealized losses related to derivative financial instruments qualifying and designated as hedges are as follows:
|
|
September 30, 2012 |
|
December 31, 2011 |
| ||||||||
|
|
Notional |
|
Unrealized |
|
Notional |
|
Unrealized |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||||||||
Foreign currency forwards |
|
$ |
52,461 |
|
$ |
103 |
|
$ |
48,802 |
|
$ |
1,017 |
|
For contracts that are not designated as hedges, the gain and loss on the contract is recognized in current earnings as Other expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. As of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, the notional amounts of the derivative financial instruments not qualifying or otherwise designated as hedges were $54.5 million and $47.6 million, respectively. During the three months ended September 30, 2012, the loss related to this type of derivative financial instruments was immaterial. During the three months ended September 30, 2011, we recorded a loss of $1.0 million related to this type of derivative financial instruments. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we recorded a gain of $0.2 million and a loss of $1.3 million, respectively, related to this type of derivative financial instruments.
The following table presents the fair value on our Consolidated Balance Sheets of the foreign currency forward contracts:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||
Foreign currency forwards designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other current assets |
|
$ |
358 |
|
$ |
334 |
|
Accrued expenses |
|
(461 |
) |
(1,351 |
) | ||
Foreign currency forwards not designated as hedges: |
|
|
|
|
| ||
Other current assets |
|
403 |
|
315 |
| ||
Accrued expenses |
|
(232 |
) |
(351 |
) | ||
Foreign currency forwards, net |
|
$ |
68 |
|
$ |
(1,053 |
) |
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 9. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Our operations are subject to extensive federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to environmental matters.
Certain environmental laws can impose joint and several liabilities for releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances upon certain statutorily defined parties regardless of fault or the lawfulness of the original activity or disposal. Hazardous substances and adverse environmental effects have been identified with respect to real property we own and on adjacent parcels of real property.
In particular, our Elmira, NY manufacturing facility is located within the Kentucky Avenue Wellfield on the National Priorities List of hazardous waste sites designated for cleanup by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) because of groundwater contamination. The Kentucky Avenue Wellfield Site (the Site) encompasses an area which includes sections of the Town of Horseheads and the Village of Elmira Heights in Chemung County, NY. In February 2006, the Company received a Special Notice Concerning a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) for the Koppers Pond (the Pond) portion of the Site. The EPA documented the release and threatened release of hazardous substances into the environment at the Site, including releases into and in the vicinity of the Pond. Hazardous substances, including metals and polychlorinated biphenyls, have been detected in sediments in the Pond.
A substantial portion of the Pond is located on our property. The Company, along with Beazer East, Inc., the Village of Horseheads, the Town of Horseheads, the County of Chemung, CBS Corporation and Toshiba America, Inc., the Potentially Responsible Parties (the PRPs) have agreed to voluntarily participate in the Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (RI/FS) by signing an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order on Consent on September 29, 2006. On September 29, 2006, the Director of Emergency and Remedial Response Division of the EPA, Region II, approved and executed the Agreement on behalf of the EPA. The PRPs also signed a PRP Member Agreement, agreeing to share the cost of the RI/FS study on a per capita basis.
In May 2008, the EPA approved the RI/FS Work Plan. The PRPs commenced field work in the spring of 2008 and on September 7, 2011 submitted the draft Remedial Investigation Report to the EPA. The PRPs are continuing to address EPA comments and to perform the tasks required by the RI/FS Work Plan and Administrative Settlement Agreement.
Until receipt of this Special Notice in February 2006, the Company had never been named as a PRP at the Site nor had the Company received any requests for information from the EPA concerning the Site. Environmental sampling on our property within this Site under supervision of regulatory authorities had identified off-site sources for such groundwater contamination and sediment contamination in the Pond, and found no evidence that our operations or property have contributed or are contributing to the contamination. We have not established a reserve for any potential costs relating to this Site, as it is too early in the process to determine our responsibility as well as to estimate any potential costs to remediate. We have notified all appropriate insurance carriers and are actively cooperating with them, but whether coverage will be available has not yet been determined and possible insurance recovery cannot now be estimated with any degree of certainty.
Although we believe, based upon information currently available that, except as described in the preceding paragraphs, we will not have material liabilities for environmental remediation, it is possible that future remedial requirements or changes in the enforcement of existing laws and regulations, which are subject to extensive regulatory discretion, will result in material liabilities to the Company.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 10. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
All of our stock-based compensation to employees is recorded as selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statements of Operations based on the fair value at the grant date of the award. These non-cash compensation costs were included in the depreciation and amortization amounts in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
A summary of stock-based compensation expense is as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||||||
Restricted stock/unit awards (RSA) |
|
$ |
64 |
|
$ |
142 |
|
$ |
305 |
|
$ |
378 |
|
Performance share incentives (PSI) |
|
22 |
|
86 |
|
123 |
|
121 |
| ||||
Stock options |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
27 |
| ||||
|
|
$ |
86 |
|
$ |
237 |
|
$ |
428 |
|
$ |
526 |
|
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, we granted 18,000 and 54,000 RSAs, respectively. The total deferred compensation expense associated with these awards, which were measured based on the fair value at the grant date, were $0.2 million and $0.7 million, respectively. The deferred compensation is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the specified service period. Unrecognized compensation and the expected weighted-average recognition periods with respect to the outstanding RSAs as of September 30, 2012 and December 31, 2011, are as follows:
|
|
September 30, |
|
December 31, |
| ||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
Unrecognized compensation cost, in thousands |
|
$ |
616 |
|
$ |
851 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Expected weighted-average recognition period for unrecognized compensation cost, in years |
|
1.3 |
|
1.2 |
| ||
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we did not grant any PSIs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we granted 54,000 PSIs. The total deferred compensation expense associated with the 2011 PSI awards, which was measured based on the fair value at the grant date, was $0.7 million. The deferred compensation is being amortized into earnings based on passage of time and achievement of performance criteria. All outstanding PSIs are unvested.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 11. EARNINGS PER SHARE
Details of the computation of earnings per share are as follows:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||||
|
|
(in thousands except per share data) |
| ||||||||||
Basic earnings per share computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
4,020 |
|
$ |
4,250 |
|
$ |
10,103 |
|
$ |
8,744 |
|
Less income allocated to participating awards |
|
26 |
|
56 |
|
74 |
|
120 |
| ||||
Net income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
3,994 |
|
$ |
4,194 |
|
$ |
10,029 |
|
$ |
8,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
11,567 |
|
11,467 |
|
11,551 |
|
11,461 |
| ||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.35 |
|
$ |
0.37 |
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Diluted earnings per share computation: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Net income |
|
$ |
4,020 |
|
$ |
4,250 |
|
$ |
10,103 |
|
$ |
8,744 |
|
Less income allocated to participating awards |
|
26 |
|
56 |
|
74 |
|
120 |
| ||||
Net income applicable to common shareholders |
|
$ |
3,994 |
|
$ |
4,194 |
|
$ |
10,029 |
|
$ |
8,624 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
11,567 |
|
11,467 |
|
11,551 |
|
11,461 |
| ||||
Assumed exercise of stock options |
|
23 |
|
25 |
|
24 |
|
26 |
| ||||
Assumed satisfaction of RSA conditions |
|
16 |
|
1 |
|
13 |
|
|
| ||||
Assumed satisfaction of PSI conditions |
|
|
|
40 |
|
|
|
40 |
| ||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding |
|
11,606 |
|
11,533 |
|
11,588 |
|
11,527 |
| ||||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
$ |
0.34 |
|
$ |
0.36 |
|
$ |
0.87 |
|
$ |
0.75 |
|
For the three months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, 133,085 and 186,753 shares, respectively, of certain stock-based awards were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they were anti-dilutive. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011, 149,285 and 175,225 shares, respectively, of certain stock-based awards were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share as they were anti-dilutive.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Continued)
September 30, 2012
NOTE 12. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued authoritative guidance to achieve common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). This pronouncement changes certain fair value measurement guidance and expands certain disclosure requirements. We adopted this pronouncement on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
In June 2011, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires companies to present items of net income, items of other comprehensive income and total comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. This guidance eliminates the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity. We adopted this pronouncement on January 1, 2012. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on our consolidated results of operations and financial condition.
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Overview. The following Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A) contains information that the Company believes is necessary to an understanding of the Companys financial condition and associated matters, including the Companys liquidity, capital resources and results of operations. The MD&A is provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction with, our unaudited financial statements, the accompanying notes to the financial statements (Notes) appearing elsewhere in this report and our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Our primary business is designing, manufacturing, and distributing high-precision computer controlled metal-cutting turning, grinding, and milling machines and related accessories. We are geographically diversified with manufacturing facilities in Switzerland, Taiwan, the United States (U.S.), China, and the United Kingdom (U.K.) with sales to most industrialized countries. Approximately 74% of our 2011 sales were to customers outside of North America, 82% of our 2011 products sold were manufactured outside of North America, and 70% of our employees were outside of North America.
Our machine products are considered to be capital goods and are part of what has historically been a highly cyclical industry. Our management believes that a key Company performance indicator is our order level as compared to industry measures of market activity levels.
Metrics on machine tool market activity monitored by our management include world machine tool consumption (which is considered, in certain respects, to be a proxy for shipments), as reported annually by Gardner Publications in the Metalworking Insiders Report and metal-cutting machine orders as reported by the Association of Manufacturing Technology (AMT), the primary industry group for U.S. machine tool manufacturers. Other closely followed U.S. market indicators are tracked to determine activity levels in U.S. manufacturing plants that are prospective customers for our products. One such measurement is the Purchasing Managers Index (PMI), as reported by the Institute for Supply Management. Another measurement is capacity utilization of U.S. manufacturing plants, as reported by the Federal Reserve Board. Similar information regarding machine tool consumption and market indicators in foreign countries is published by trade associations or government agencies in those countries.
Non-machine sales, which include collets, accessories, repair parts and service revenue, have typically accounted for approximately 23% of overall sales and are an important part of our business due to an existing installed base of thousands of machines. In the past, sales of these products and services have not fluctuated on a year-to-year basis as significantly as the sales of our machines have from time to time, but demand for these products and services typically track the direction of the related machine sale metrics.
Other key performance indicators are geographic distribution of net sales (sales) and net orders (orders), gross profit as a percent of sales, income from operations, working capital changes, and debt level trends. Constant product technology development in our industry has led to an average model life of three-to-five years and consequently, effectiveness of technological innovation and development of new products are also key Company performance indicators.
We are exposed to financial market risk resulting from changes in interest and foreign currency rates. Global economic conditions and related disruptions within the financial markets have also increased our exposure to the possible liquidity and credit risks of our counterparties. We believe we have sufficient liquidity to fund our foreseeable business needs, including cash and cash equivalents, cash flows from operations, and our bank financing arrangements.
We monitor the third-party depository institutions that hold our cash and cash equivalents. Our primary emphasis is the safety of principal. Deposits of our cash and cash equivalents are diversified among counterparties to minimize exposure to any one of these entities.
We are also subject to credit risks relating to the ability of hedging transaction counterparties to meet their contractual payment obligations. The risks related to creditworthiness and nonperformance has been considered in the fair value measurements of our foreign currency forward exchange contracts.
We also expect that some of our customers and vendors may experience difficulty in maintaining the liquidity required to buy inventory or raw materials. We continue to monitor our customers financial condition in order to mitigate the risks associated with collection on our accounts receivable.
Foreign currency exchange rate changes can be significant to reported results for several reasons. Our primary competitors, particularly for the most technologically advanced products, are now predominantly manufacturers based in Japan, Germany, Switzerland, Korea, and Taiwan. The concentration of our competitors in these countries causes the worldwide valuation of their respective currencies to be integral to competitive pricing in all of our markets. The major functional currencies of our subsidiaries are the British Pound Sterling (GBP), Chinese Renminbi (CNY), Euro (EUR), New Taiwanese Dollar (TWD), and Swiss Franc (CHF). Under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles, results of foreign subsidiaries are translated into U.S. Dollars (USD) at the average exchange rate during the periods presented. Period-to-period changes in the exchange rate may affect comparative data significantly.
Below is a summary of the percentage changes for our functional currencies in 2012 as compared to their respective USD equivalents during the same periods in 2011.
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
September 30 |
|
September 30 |
|
|
|
increase / (decrease) |
| ||
|
|
|
| ||
CHF |
|
(14.17 |
)% |
(6.89 |
)% |
CNY |
|
0.93 |
% |
2.63 |
% |
EUR |
|
(11.36 |
)% |
(8.84 |
)% |
GBP |
|
(1.77 |
)% |
(2.24 |
)% |
TWD |
|
(2.25 |
)% |
(2.07 |
)% |
The change in foreign currency exchange rates resulted in unfavorable currency translation impact of approximately $2.8 million on orders and approximately $3.6 million on sales in the three months ended September 30, 2012, compared to the same period in 2011. For the nine months ended September 30, 2012, the change in foreign currency exchange rates resulted in unfavorable currency translation impact of approximately $4.2 million on orders and approximately $4.8 million on sales, as compared to the same period in 2011. We also purchase computer controls and other components from suppliers throughout the world. Consequently, our purchase costs associated with these components will be affected by fluctuations in the value of currencies.
Results of Operations
Summarized selected financial data for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
% |
| ||||||
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Orders |
|
$ |
68,359 |
|
$ |
81,474 |
|
$ |
(13,115 |
) |
(16 |
)% |
$ |
230,063 |
|
$ |
303,377 |
|
$ |
(73,314 |
) |
(24 |
)% |
Sales |
|
82,883 |
|
90,389 |
|
(7,506 |
) |
(8 |
)% |
243,853 |
|
250,527 |
|
(6,674 |
) |
(3 |
)% | ||||||
Gross profit |
|
24,027 |
|
25,549 |
|
(1,522 |
) |
(6 |
)% |
69,256 |
|
67,928 |
|
1,328 |
|
2 |
% | ||||||
% of sales |
|
29.0 |
% |
28.3 |
% |
0.7 |
pts. |
|
|
28.4 |
% |
27.1 |
% |
1.3 |
pts. |
|
| ||||||
Selling, general & administrative expenses |
|
18,602 |
|
18,943 |
|
(341 |
) |
(2 |
)% |
55,316 |
|
54,609 |
|
707 |
|
1 |
% | ||||||
% of sales |
|
22.4 |
% |
21.0 |
% |
1.4 |
pts. |
|
|
22.7 |
% |
21.8 |
% |
0.9 |
pts. |
|
| ||||||
Other expense |
|
127 |
|
284 |
|
(157 |
) |
(55 |
)% |
430 |
|
389 |
|
41 |
|
11 |
% | ||||||
Income from operations |
|
5,311 |
|
6,327 |
|
(1,016 |
) |
(16 |
)% |
13,537 |
|
12,953 |
|
584 |
|
5 |
% | ||||||
% of sales |
|
6.4 |
% |
7.0 |
% |
(0.6 |
)pts. |
|
|
5.6 |
% |
5.2 |
% |
0.4 |
pts. |
|
| ||||||
Net income |
|
4,020 |
|
4,250 |
|
(230 |
) |
(5 |
)% |
10,103 |
|
8,744 |
|
1,359 |
|
16 |
% | ||||||
% of sales |
|
4.9 |
% |
4.7 |
% |
0.2 |
pts. |
|
|
4.1 |
% |
3.5 |
% |
0.6 |
pts. |
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Basic earnings per share |
|
0.35 |
|
0.37 |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.87 |
|
0.75 |
|
0.12 |
|
|
| ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
|
0.34 |
|
0.36 |
|
(0.02 |
) |
|
|
0.87 |
|
0.75 |
|
0.12 |
|
|
| ||||||
Orders. The table below summarizes orders by each corresponding geographical region for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the same periods in 2011:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
% |
| ||||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
North America |
|
$ |
20,913 |
|
$ |
20,167 |
|
$ |
746 |
|
4 |
% |
$ |
61,572 |
|
$ |
72,788 |
|
$ |
(11,216 |
) |
(15 |
)% |
Europe |
|
23,756 |
|
29,735 |
|
(5,979 |
) |
(20 |
)% |
86,041 |
|
93,490 |
|
(7,449 |
) |
(8 |
)% | ||||||
Asia |
|
23,690 |
|
31,572 |
|
(7,882 |
) |
(25 |
)% |
82,450 |
|
137,099 |
|
(54,649 |
) |
(40 |
)% | ||||||
|
|
$ |
68,359 |
|
$ |
81,474 |
|
$ |
(13,115 |
) |
(16 |
)% |
$ |
230,063 |
|
$ |
303,377 |
|
$ |
(73,314 |
) |
(24 |
)% |
Orders during the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $68.3 million, a decrease of $13.1 million, or 16%, when compared to the same period in 2011. Orders during the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $230.1 million, a decrease of $73.3 million or 24%, when compared to the same period in 2011. The decrease from the prior year periods was the result of lower demand for machine tools attributable, in part, to the decelerating Chinese economy along with uncertainty in Europe due to overall economic and fiscal conditions. On a year-to-date basis, the decrease over the prior year period was also the result of exceptional growth experienced by the machine tool industry during nine months ended September 30, 2011. Order volume during the first half of 2011 was at a historical high for the Company as customers reacted to the increasing prices and extended lead times. These trends resulted from constraints on the machine tool supply chain due to significant demand caused by a strong economic recovery in the industry. Foreign currency translation had an unfavorable impact of approximately $2.8 million and $4.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2011.
North America orders increased by $0.7 million, or 4%, and decreased by $11.2 million, or 15%, for the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. The year-to-date decrease in order level was driven by higher order levels during the first half of 2011 as our distributors and customers were reacting to longer lead times resulting from supply chain constraints as well as the potential for price increases due to the rising costs of raw materials and components.
Europe orders decreased by $6.0 million, or 20%, and $7.4 million, or 8%, for the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. Foreign currency translation had an unfavorable impact of approximately $2.9 million and $5.3 million for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2011. Excluding the unfavorable foreign currency impact, Europe orders decreased by $3.1 million, or 10.4%, and $2.1 million, or 2.3%, in the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. The decrease in order levels over the prior year periods was attributable to the challenging economic and fiscal climate in the region.
Asia orders decreased by $7.9 million, or 25%, and $54.6 million, or 40%, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011, respectively. The decrease was driven by declining demands for machine tools in the region as a result of the decelerating Chinese economy during the current year period as compared to an overheated economy during the same period in 2011. The impact of the overheated economy in 2011 was further influenced by supply chain constraints and customers placing orders to ensure deliveries as a result of long lead times for machine tools. Additionally, multiple machine orders from a China-based supplier to the consumer electronics industry were $4.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2012, a $8.1 million decrease compared to the same period in 2011. The impact of foreign currency translation was not material to Asia orders for the three months ended September 30, 2012 when compared to the same period in 2011, but had a favorable impact of approximately $1.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 when compared to the same period in 2011.
Sales. The table below summarizes sales by each corresponding geographical region for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to the same periods in 2011:
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
September 30, |
|
September 30, |
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
% |
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
|
$ |
|
% |
| ||||||
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||
North America |
|
$ |
20,161 |
|
$ |
22,480 |
|
$ |
(2,319 |
) |
(10 |
)% |
$ |
59,517 |
|
$ |
58,204 |
|
$ |
1,313 |
|
2 |
% |
Europe |
|
27,445 |
|
33,293 |
|
(5,848 |
) |
(18 |
)% |
86,130 |
|
78,376 |
|
7,754 |
|
10 |
% | ||||||
Asia |
|
35,277 |
|
34,616 |
|
661 |
|
2 |
% |
98,206 |
|
113,947 |
|
(15,741 |
) |
(14 |
)% | ||||||
|
|
$ |
82,883 |
|
$ |
90,389 |
|
$ |
(7,506 |
) |
(8 |
)% |
$ |
243,853 |
|
$ |
250,527 |
|
$ |
(6,674 |
) |
(3 |
)% |
Sales for the three months ended September 30, 2012 were $82.9 million, a decrease of $7.5 million, or 8%, when compared to the same period in 2011. Sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $243.9 million, a decrease of $6.7 million, or 3%, when compared to the same period in 2011. Foreign currency translation had an unfavorable impact of approximately $3.6 million and $4.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2011. Excluding the unfavorable foreign currency translation impact, sales decreased by $3.9 million, or 4%, and $1.9 million, or 1%, for the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. The decrease over the prior year periods was attributable to lower demand caused by a slowing global economy.
North America sales decreased by $2.3 million, or 10%, and increased by $1.3 million, or 2%, for the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. Sales during the three months ended September 31, 2012 began to decelerate compared to the improved sales level resulted from the strengthening in the economy during the prior year period. The increase in North America sales during the nine month period can be attributed to an improved U.S. industrial economy during the first half of 2012 and the effectiveness of our sales channels as compared to the prior year periods.
Europe sales decreased by $5.8 million, or 18%, and increased by $7.8 million, or 10%, for the respective three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. Foreign currency translation had an unfavorable impact of approximately $3.7 million and approximately $6.2 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, when compared to the same periods in 2011. Excluding the unfavorable foreign currency impact, Europe sales decreased by $2.2 million, or 7%, and increased by $13.9 million, or 18%, in the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. The decrease in sales during the three month period was a result of lower demand due, in part, to concerns on European economic and fiscal conditions. The increase in sales on a year-to-date basis was noted across all of our machine product lines and was driven by higher demand during the first half of 2012 for machine tools attributable to solid activity levels in Germany and the United Kingdom.
Asia sales increased $0.7 million, or 2%, and decreased by $15.7 million, or 14%, for the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. Multi-machine sales to the suppliers to the consumer electronics industry were approximately $10.6 million and $15.8 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, when compared to $1.3 million and $17.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. Excluding these multi-machine sales, Asia sales decreased by $8.6 million, or 26%, and $14.0 million, or 15%, for the respective three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, when compared to the same periods in 2011. The decrease was primarily due to the decelerating Chinese economy. Foreign currency translation had a favorable impact of approximately $0.1 million and approximately $1.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, when compared to the same period in 2011.
Sales of machines accounted for approximately 78% and 77% of the consolidated sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively. Sales of non-machine products and services, primarily workholding, repair parts, and accessories, accounted for 22% and 23% of the consolidated sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively.
Gross Profit. Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $24.0 million, a decrease of $1.5 million, or 6.0%, when compared to the same period in 2011. This decrease in gross profit was primarily due to lower sales volume. Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $69.3 million, an increase of $1.3 million, or 2.0%, when compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2011. The increase in gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was primarily attributable to favorable pricing and product mix. Gross margin for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2012 were 29.0% and 28.4%, respectively, compared to 28.3% and 27.1% for the same periods in 2011.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses were $18.6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012. This amount is relatively flat when compared to $18.9 million for the same period in 2011. SG&A expenses were $55.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 when compared to $54.6 million for the same period in 2011. This year-over-year increase is primarily inflationary.
SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales was 22.4% for the three months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of 1.4 percentage points compared to 21.0% for the same period in 2011. SG&A expenses as a percentage of sales was 22.7% for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, an increase of 0.9 percentage points, as compared to 21.8% for the same period in 2011. For both the three and nine month periods, the increase is mainly reflective of lower sales volume.
Other Expense. Other expense was $0.1 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to income of $0.3 million for the same period in 2011. Other expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $0.4 million compared to expense of $0.4 million during the same period in 2011.
Income from Operations. Income from operations was $5.3 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $6.3 million for the same period in 2011. Income from operations was $13.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $13.0 million for the same period in 2011.
Interest Expense, Net. Net interest expense was $0.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $0.05 million for the same period in 2011. Net interest expense was $0.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $0.1 million for the same period in 2011. The increase in interest expense was attributable to the Companys higher average outstanding indebtedness as of September 30, 2012 as compared to the same period in 2011.
Income Taxes. The provision for income taxes was $1.1 million and $2.9 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to $2.0 million and $4.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011, respectively. The effective tax rates were 21.3% and 22.1% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, compared to 32.3% and 31.8% for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2011.
The difference in effective tax rates between the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011 was driven by the mix of earnings by country and by the non-recognition of tax benefits for certain entities in a loss position for which a full valuation allowance has been recorded.
Each quarter, an estimate of the full year tax rate for jurisdictions not subject to a full valuation allowance is developed based upon anticipated annual results and an adjustment is made, if required, to the year-to-date income tax expense to reflect the full year anticipated effective tax rate.
We continue to maintain a full valuation allowance on the tax benefits of our U.S. net deferred tax assets and we expect to continue to record a full valuation allowance on future tax benefits until an appropriate level of profitability in the U.S. is sustained. We also maintain full valuation allowances on our
U.K., German, Netherlands, and Canadian deferred tax assets related to tax loss carryforwards in those jurisdictions, as well as all other deferred tax assets of those entities.
The effective tax rates for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 of 21.3% and 22.1%, respectively, differ from the U.S. statutory rate primarily due to no tax benefit being recorded for certain entities in a loss position for which a full valuation allowance has been recorded, and due to the rate difference between the U.S. and non-US entities.
Net Income. Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2012 was $4.0 million, or 4.9% of net sales, compared to $4.3 million, or 4.7% of net sales, for the same period in 2011. The decrease in net income is mainly attributable to lower sales volume, offset by the effect of a more favorable tax rate. Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 was $10.1 million, or 4.1% of net sales, compared to $8.7 million, or 3.5% of net sales, for the same period in 2011. The increase in net income is attributable to higher gross profit which is the result of favorable pricing and product mix and the effect of a more favorable tax rate. Basic earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $0.35 and $0.87, respectively, compared to $0.37 and $0.75, respectively, for the same periods ended September 30, 2011. Diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012 were $0.34 and $0.87, respectively, compared to $0.36 and $0.75, respectively, for the same periods ended September 30, 2011.
Summary of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and 2011:
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
| ||||
|
|
2012 |
|
2011 |
| ||
|
|
(in thousands) |
| ||||
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities |
|
$ |
5,685 |
|
$ |
(8,995 |
) |
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
(6,127 |
) |
(12,612 |
) | ||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
|
(3 |
) |
11,788 |
| ||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
216 |
|
135 |
| ||
Decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
(229 |
) |
$ |
(9,684 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
| ||
Capital expenditures (included in investing activities) |
|
$ |
(6,167 |
) |
$ |
(13,520 |
) |
During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, we generated $5.7 million net cash from operating activities, an improvement of $14.7 million compared to $9.0 million net cash used in operating activities during the same period in 2011. The improved cash flow from operating activities was driven by higher year-to-date profit partially offset by increases in finished goods inventory to support pending shipments as well as improved customer service levels. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, net cash was primarily provided by collections on accounts receivables. The cash inflow was offset by cash used in inventory purchases, vendor payments, reduction in customer deposits, and contributions to the pension plans.
During the nine months ended September 30, 2011, we used $9.0 million net cash in operating activities. Primarily, cash was used for inventory purchases which increased due to higher demand for our products and related increase in production levels. Cash was also used to fund accounts receivables, and other working capital needs as business activity levels increased. The outflow of cash was offset by cash provided by accounts payables and accrued expenses which increased due to higher production levels and higher customer deposits related to increased order activities.
Net cash used in investing activities was $6.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 compared to $12.6 million for the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily due to lower capital expenditures as we had completed the construction portion of our facility expansion projects in Switzerland and China as of September 30, 2012.
Net cash used in financing activities was immaterial for the nine months ended September 30, 2012, compared to $11.8 million cash provided by financing activities for the same period in 2011. The decrease was primarily due to higher borrowings in 2011 to fund facility expansion in China and increasing working capital needs. The decrease was also due to managing outstanding debt under our existing credit facilities to align financing activities to current working capital and investment needs.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our liquidity requirements primarily include funding for operations, including working capital requirements, and funding for capital investments and acquisitions. We expect to meet these requirements in the long term through cash provided by operating activities and availability under various credit facilities and other financing arrangements. Cash flows from operating activities are primarily driven by earnings before noncash charges and change in working capital needs. During the nine months ended September 30, 2012, cash flows from operating activities and available cash were sufficient to fund our investment activities, primarily capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment and other productive assets. We had additional borrowing capacity of $44.5 million at September 30, 2012, and $43.4 million at December 31, 2011, available under various credit facilities maintained by the Company and certain Company subsidiaries.
We assess on an ongoing basis our portfolio of operations, as well as our financial and capital structures, to ensure we have sufficient capital and liquidity to meet our strategic objectives. As part of this process, from time to time we evaluate and pursue acquisition opportunities that we believe will enhance our strategic position.
Certain statements in this report, other than purely historical information, including estimates, projections, statements relating to our business plans, objectives and expected operating results, and the assumptions upon which those statements are based, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These forward-looking statements generally are identified by the words believes, project, expects, anticipates, estimates, intends, strategy, plan, may, will, would, will be, will continue, will likely result, and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to risks and uncertainties which may cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Accordingly, there can be no assurance that our expectations will be realized. Such statements are based upon information known to management at this time. The Company cautions that such statements necessarily involve uncertainties and risk and deal with matters beyond the Companys ability to control, and in many cases the Company cannot predict what factors would cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated. Among the many factors that could cause actual results to differ from those set forth in the forward-looking statements are fluctuations in the machine tool business cycles, changes in general economic conditions in the U.S. or internationally, the mix of products sold and the profit margins thereon, the relative success of the Companys entry into new product and geographic markets, the Companys ability to manage its operating costs, actions taken by customers such as order cancellations or reduced bookings by customers or distributors, competitors actions such as price discounting or new product introductions, governmental regulations and environmental matters, changes in the availability and cost of materials and supplies, the implementation of new technologies and currency fluctuations. Any forward-looking statement should be considered in light of these factors. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise its forward-looking statements if unanticipated events alter their accuracy.
PART I.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISKS
There have been no material changes to our market risk exposures during the first nine months of 2012. For a discussion of our exposure to market risk, refer to Item 7A, Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risks, contained in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Management of the Company, under the supervision and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Companys disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2012, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and determined that these controls and procedures were effective.
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 2012 that has materially affected or is reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)under the Exchange Act.
None
There is no change to the risk factors disclosed in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
None
ITEM 3. DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
None
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not Applicable
None
ITEM 6. |
3.1 |
Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Hardinge Inc. filed with the Secretary of State of the State of New York on May 24, 1995, incorporated by reference from the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. | |
|
| |
3.2 |
Certificate of Amendment of the Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Hardinge Inc. Company, incorporated by reference from the Registrants Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on February 23, 2010. | |
|
| |
3.3 |
By-Laws of Hardinge Inc., incorporated by reference from the Registrants Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011. | |
|
| |
4.1 |
Specimen of certificate for shares of Common Stock, par value $.01 per share, of Hardinge Inc., incorporated by reference from the Registrants Registration Statement on Form 8-A, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 19, 1995. | |
|
| |
31.1 |
Chief Executive Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
|
| |
31.2 |
Chief Financial Officer Certification pursuant to Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
|
| |
32 |
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
| ||
101.INS* |
XBRL Instance Document | |
|
| |
101.SCH* |
XBRL Taxonomy Schema Document | |
|
| |
101.CAL* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document | |
|
| |
101.LAB* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document | |
|
| |
101.PRE* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document | |
|
| |
101.DEF* |
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document | |
*In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or otherwise subject to the liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such filing.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
Hardinge Inc. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2012 |
|
By: |
/s/ Richard L. Simons |
Date |
|
|
Richard L. Simons |
|
|
|
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2012 |
|
By: |
/s/ Edward J. Gaio |
Date |
|
|
Edward J. Gaio. |
|
|
|
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Financial Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 8, 2012 |
|
By: |
/s/ Douglas J. Malone |
Date |
|
|
Douglas J. Malone |
|
|
|
Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer |
|
|
|
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
EXHIBIT 31.1
HARDINGE INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Richard L. Simons, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hardinge Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal controls over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 8, 2012 |
/s/ Richard L. Simons |
|
|
|
Richard L. Simons |
|
Chairman, President and |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
EXHIBIT 31.2
HARDINGE INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Edward J. Gaio, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Hardinge Inc.;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting.
Date: November 8, 2012 |
/s/ Edward J. Gaio |
|
|
|
Edward J. Gaio |
|
Vice President and |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
EXHIBIT 32
HARDINGE INC.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report of Hardinge Inc. (the Company) on Form 10-Q for the period ended September 30, 2012 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Richard L. Simons, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and I, Edward J. Gaio, Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to the best of our knowledge:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
|
/s/ Richard L. Simons |
|
Richard L. Simons |
|
Chairman, President and |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
November 8, 2012 |
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Edward J. Gaio |
|
Edward J. Gaio |
|
Vice President and |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
November 8, 2012 |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906, or other document authenticating, acknowledging, or otherwise adopting the signatures that appear in typed form within the electronic version of this written statement required by Section 906, has been provided to Hardinge Inc. and will be retained by Hardinge Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
FAIR VALUE AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS (Details) (USD $)
In Thousands, unless otherwise specified |
Sep. 30, 2012
|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
---|---|---|
Foreign currency forward | ||
Restricted cash | $ 5,088 | $ 4,575 |
Foreign currency forward contracts, net | 68 | (1,053) |
Measured on recurring basis | Total
|
||
Foreign currency forward | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | 21,507 | 21,736 |
Restricted cash | 5,088 | 4,575 |
Notes payable to bank | (14,150) | (12,969) |
Variable interest rate debt | (8,516) | (8,568) |
Foreign currency forward contracts, net | 68 | (1,053) |
Measured on recurring basis | Level 1
|
||
Foreign currency forward | ||
Cash and cash equivalents | 21,507 | 21,736 |
Restricted cash | 5,088 | 4,575 |
Measured on recurring basis | Level 2
|
||
Foreign currency forward | ||
Notes payable to bank | (14,150) | (12,969) |
Variable interest rate debt | (8,516) | (8,568) |
Foreign currency forward contracts, net | $ 68 | $ (1,053) |
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Tables)
|
9 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary of stock based compensation expense |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Schedule of unrecognized compensation and the expected weighted-average recognition periods with respect to the outstanding RSAs |
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
|
9 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sep. 30, 2012
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
|