COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2018
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits as a result of normal operations and in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the outcome of these lawsuits will not have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations. The Company’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations relating to environmental matters. Certain environmental laws can impose joint and several liability for releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances upon certain statutorily defined parties regardless of fault or the lawfulness of the original activity or disposal. Hazardous substances and adverse environmental effects have been identified with respect to real property owned by the Company, and on adjacent parcels of real property. In particular, the Elmira, NY manufacturing facility is located within the Kentucky Avenue Wellfield on the National Priorities List of hazardous waste sites designated for cleanup by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") because of groundwater contamination. The Kentucky Avenue Wellfield Site (the "Site") encompasses an area which includes sections of the Town of Horseheads and the Village of Elmira Heights in Chemung County, NY. In February 2006, the Company received a Special Notice Concerning a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study ("RI/FS") for the Koppers Pond (the “Pond”) portion of the Site. The EPA documented the release and threatened release of hazardous substances into the environment at the Site, including releases into and in the vicinity of the Pond. The hazardous substances, including metals and polychlorinated biphenyls, have been detected in sediments in the Pond. Until receipt of this Special Notice in February 2006, the Company had never been named as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) at the Site nor had the Company received any requests for information from the EPA concerning the Site. Environmental sampling on the Company’s property within the Site under supervision of regulatory authorities had identified off-site sources for such groundwater contamination and sediment contamination in the Pond, and found no evidence that the Company’s operations or property have contributed or are contributing to the contamination. All appropriate insurance carriers have been notified, and the Company is actively cooperating with them, but whether coverage will be available has not yet been determined and possible insurance recovery cannot be estimated with any degree of certainty at this time. A substantial portion of the Pond is located on the Company’s property. The Company, along with Beazer East, Inc., the Village of Horseheads, the Town of Horseheads, the County of Chemung, CBS Corporation and Toshiba America, Inc., (collectively, the "PRP's"), agreed to voluntarily participate in the RI/FS by signing an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order of Consent (the "Settlement Agreement") on September 29, 2006. On September 29, 2006, the Director of Emergency and Remedial Response Division of the EPA, Region II, approved and executed the Agreement on behalf of the EPA. The PRP's also signed a PRP Member Agreement, agreeing to share the costs associated with the RI/FS study on a per capita basis. The EPA approved the RI/FS Work Plan in May of 2008. In July of 2012 the PRP's submitted a Remedial Investigation (RI) to respond to issues raised by the EPA in the initial draft RI. In January 2016, the PRP's submitted a draft Feasibility Study (FS), also to respond to issues raised by the EPA about previous drafts of the FS. In July 2016, the EPA announced its proposed remediation plan based on an alternative put forth in a July 2016 Woodruff & Curran FS with an estimated total clean-up phase cost of $1.9 million. The preferred remedy consists of the placement of a continuous six-inch thick soil and sand cap, including a geotextile membrane to act as a demarcation layer, over the Pond. The preferred remedy includes long-term monitoring and institutional controls. After a public comment period, on December 13, 2016, the EPA issued a Certificate of Completion confirming that the RI/FS was complete, confirming that all PRP obligations related to the RI/FS had been performed in accordance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement, and approving the remedy selected in the FS as the final response action for the Pond. In June 2017, the EPA issued a Special Notice letter to the original PRP’s and two new additional parties (Eaton Corporation and Elmira Water Board) requesting these PRPs to fund, undertake, and complete the remedy for the Pond. Shortly after, the EPA provided a proposed Statement of Work for completion of the remedy (“SOW”) and the EPA agreed to waive the past response costs as defined in the Settlement Agreement in full if the parties could reach a settlement with the EPA by September 30, 2017. In September 2017 the nine participating PRPs privately negotiated and finalized an allocation of costs amongst themselves, with 10.75% of the costs being allocated to the Company. Based on the estimated cost of the present remedy of $1.9 million, and with credit for costs previously paid by the Company for the RI/FS, the remaining costs that have been allocated to the Company will not exceed $0.2 million. The Company has the entire amount reserved as of March 31, 2018. This reserve is reported in "Accrued expenses" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. In February 2018 the PRP Group selected a Site and Project Coordinator to assist in implementation of the SOW for the remedy. It is contemplated that most of the required work will be completed in 2018. Based upon information currently available the Company does not have material liabilities for environmental remediation, except as described in the preceding paragraphs. Though the foregoing reflects the Company’s current assessment as it relates to environmental remediation obligations, it is possible that future remedial requirements or changes in the enforcement of existing laws and regulations, which are subject to extensive regulatory discretion, will result in material liabilities to the Company. Litigation Relating to the Merger On April 4, 2018, a purported class action complaint relating to the Merger was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York on behalf of a putative class of Hardinge’s public shareholders (the “federal case”). The complaint in the federal case alleges that Hardinge and its directors breached federal securities laws by failing to disclose material information in the preliminary form of the 2018 proxy statement filed on February 13, 2018. In addition, on April 16, 2018, a purported class action complaint relating to the Merger was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Chemung (the “state case”). The complaint in the state case alleges that Hardinge and its directors breached their fiduciary duties by entering into the Merger Agreement and by failing to disclose allegedly material information in connection with the Merger. The complaints seek, among other things, injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the merger, damages and an award of plaintiff’s expenses and attorneys’ fees. We believe that the claims asserted are without merit.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is a defendant in various lawsuits as a result of normal operations and in the ordinary course of business. Management believes the outcome of these lawsuits will not have a material effect on the financial position or results of operations.

The Company’s operations are subject to extensive federal, state, local, and foreign laws and regulations relating to environmental matters. Certain environmental laws can impose joint and several liability for releases or threatened releases of hazardous substances upon certain statutorily defined parties regardless of fault or the lawfulness of the original activity or disposal. Hazardous substances and adverse environmental effects have been identified with respect to real property owned by the Company, and on adjacent parcels of real property.

In particular, the Elmira, NY manufacturing facility is located within the Kentucky Avenue Wellfield on the National Priorities List of hazardous waste sites designated for cleanup by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") because of groundwater contamination. The Kentucky Avenue Wellfield Site (the "Site") encompasses an area which includes sections of the Town of Horseheads and the Village of Elmira Heights in Chemung County, NY. In February 2006, the Company received a Special Notice Concerning a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study ("RI/FS") for the Koppers Pond (the “Pond”) portion of the Site. The EPA documented the release and threatened release of hazardous substances into the environment at the Site, including releases into and in the vicinity of the Pond. The hazardous substances, including metals and polychlorinated biphenyls, have been detected in sediments in the Pond.

Until receipt of this Special Notice in February 2006, the Company had never been named as a potentially responsible party (“PRP”) at the Site nor had the Company received any requests for information from the EPA concerning the Site. Environmental sampling on the Company’s property within the Site under supervision of regulatory authorities had identified off-site sources for such groundwater contamination and sediment contamination in the Pond, and found no evidence that the Company’s operations or property have contributed or are contributing to the contamination. All appropriate insurance carriers have been notified, and the Company is actively cooperating with them, but whether coverage will be available has not yet been determined and possible insurance recovery cannot be estimated with any degree of certainty at this time.

A substantial portion of the Pond is located on the Company’s property. The Company, along with Beazer East, Inc., the Village of Horseheads, the Town of Horseheads, the County of Chemung, CBS Corporation and Toshiba America, Inc., (collectively, the "PRP's"), agreed to voluntarily participate in the RI/FS by signing an Administrative Settlement Agreement and Order of Consent (the "Settlement Agreement") on September 29, 2006. On September 29, 2006, the Director of Emergency and Remedial Response Division of the EPA, Region II, approved and executed the Agreement on behalf of the EPA. The PRP's also signed a PRP Member Agreement, agreeing to share the costs associated with the RI/FS study on a per capita basis.

The EPA approved the RI/FS Work Plan in May of 2008. In July of 2012 the PRP's submitted a Remedial Investigation (RI) to respond to issues raised by the EPA in the initial draft RI. In January 2016, the PRP's submitted a draft Feasibility Study (FS), also to respond to issues raised by the EPA about previous drafts of the FS. In July 2016, the EPA announced its proposed remediation plan based on an alternative put forth in a July 2016 Woodruff & Curran FS with an estimated total clean-up phase cost of $1.9 million. The preferred remedy consists of the placement of a continuous six-inch thick soil and sand cap, including a geotextile membrane to act as a demarcation layer, over the Pond. The preferred remedy includes long-term monitoring and institutional controls. After a public comment period, on December 13, 2016, the EPA issued a Certificate of Completion confirming that the RI/FS was complete, confirming that all PRP obligations related to the RI/FS had been performed in accordance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement, and approving the remedy selected in the FS as the final response action for the Pond.

In June 2017, the EPA issued a Special Notice letter to the original PRP’s and two new additional parties (Eaton Corporation and Elmira Water Board) requesting these PRPs to fund, undertake, and complete the remedy for the Pond. Shortly after, the EPA provided a proposed Statement of Work for completion of the remedy (“SOW”) and the EPA agreed to waive the past response costs as defined in the Settlement Agreement in full if the parties could reach a settlement with the EPA by September 30, 2017.

In September 2017 the nine participating PRPs privately negotiated and finalized an allocation of costs amongst themselves, with 10.75% of the costs being allocated to the Company. Based on the estimated cost of the present remedy of $1.9 million, and with credit for costs previously paid by the Company for the RI/FS, the remaining costs that have been allocated to the Company will not exceed $0.2 million. The Company has the entire amount reserved as of March 31, 2018. This reserve is reported in "Accrued expenses" in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

In February 2018 the PRP Group selected a Site and Project Coordinator to assist in implementation of the SOW for the remedy. It is contemplated that most of the required work will be completed in 2018.

Based upon information currently available the Company does not have material liabilities for environmental remediation, except as described in the preceding paragraphs. Though the foregoing reflects the Company’s current assessment as it relates to environmental remediation obligations, it is possible that future remedial requirements or changes in the enforcement of existing laws and regulations, which are subject to extensive regulatory discretion, will result in material liabilities to the Company.

Litigation Relating to the Merger

On April 4, 2018, a purported class action complaint relating to the Merger was filed in the United States District Court for the Western District of New York on behalf of a putative class of Hardinge’s public shareholders (the “federal case”). The complaint in the federal case alleges that Hardinge and its directors breached federal securities laws by failing to disclose material information in the preliminary form of the 2018 proxy statement filed on February 13, 2018. In addition, on April 16, 2018, a purported class action complaint relating to the Merger was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Chemung (the “state case”). The complaint in the state case alleges that Hardinge and its directors breached their fiduciary duties by entering into the Merger Agreement and by failing to disclose allegedly material information in connection with the Merger. The complaints seek, among other things, injunctive relief preventing the consummation of the merger, damages and an award of plaintiff’s expenses and attorneys’ fees. We believe that the claims asserted are without merit.