XML 27 R9.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.1.9
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2015
FAIR VALUE AND DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS  
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
 
The inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value are classified into the following categories:
 
Level 1 — Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
 
Level 2 — Observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities.
 
Level 3 — Inputs for which significant valuation assumptions are unobservable in a market and therefore value is based on the best available data, some of which is internally developed and considers risk premiums that a market participant would require.

The following table presents the carrying amount, fair values, and classification level within the fair value hierarchy of financial instruments measured or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis (in thousands):
 
March 31, 2015
 
December 31, 2014
 
Level of Fair Value Hierarchy
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Carrying Amount
 
Fair Value
 
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash and cash equivalents
$
18,300

 
$
18,300

 
$
16,293

 
$
16,293

 
Level 1
Restricted cash
3,019

 
3,019

 
3,151

 
3,151

 
Level 1
Foreign currency forward contracts
747

 
747

 
307

 
307

 
Level 2
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Notes payable to bank
124

 
124

 

 

 
Level 2
Variable interest rate debt
14,987

 
14,987

 
16,225

 
16,225

 
Level 2
Foreign currency forward contracts
448

 
448

 
629

 
629

 
Level 2
 
The fair value of cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are based on the fair values of identical assets in active markets. Due to the short period to maturity or the nature of the underlying liability, the fair value of notes payable to bank and variable interest rate debt approximates their respective carrying amounts. The fair value of foreign currency forward contracts is measured using internal models based on observable market inputs such as spot and forward rates. Based on the Company’s continued ability to enter into forward contracts, the markets for the fair value instruments are considered to be active. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, there were no significant transfers in and/or out of Level 1 and Level 2.