8-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.    20549
FORM 8-K
CURRENT REPORT
Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Date of Report
(Date of earliest event reported)
November 27, 2006
THE EXPLORATION COMPANY OF DELAWARE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware	0-9120		84-0793089
(State of	(Commission File		(IRS Employer
incorporation)	Number)		Identification No.)
777 E. Sonterra Blvd., Suite 350
San Antonio, Texas		78258
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)
(210) 496-5300
(Registrant's telephone number,
including area code)
Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the    registrant under any of the following provisions (see General Instruction A.2. below):
o     Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)
o     Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)
o     Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))
o     Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Item 7.01:  Regulation FD
The Registrant posted its November Update on its web site on November 27, 2006, in advance of its upcoming presentations in Milwaukee and Chicago on November 29-30, 2006. The description of the slides for the presentation is attached as Exhibit 99.1.
Item 9.01:  Financial Statements and Exhibits
	Exhibit Number	Description
	99.1	Description of presentation slides
The information contained in this report under Item 7.01, including the exhibits, is intended to be furnished and shall not be deemed "filed" for the purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, nor shall such information be deemed incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Dated: November 28, 2006
THE EXPLORATION COMPANY OF DELAWARE, INC.
			/s/ Richard A. Sartor
			Richard A. Sartor
			Controller

EX-99

Exhibit 99.1
Presentation Outline for Presentations in Milwaukee and Chicago November 29-30, 2006
Slide 1 - Continuing Growth                November 2006 Update                Roberto R. Thomae, Vice President-Capital Markets
Slide 2 - Corporate Information
-     Headquarters: The Exploration Company; 777 E. Sonterra Blvd., Suite 350;                 San Antonio, Texas 78258; Phone: (210) 496-5300; Fax: (210) 496-3232; www.txco.com
-     Contacts:  James E. Sigmon, President and CEO, jsigmon@txco.com                        Roberto R. Thomae, Vice President-Capital Markets, bthomae@txco.com
-     TXCO - NASDAQ Listed, a NASDAQ Global Select Company
-     Forward-Looking Information  -  Information presented herein which is not historical, including
	statements regarding TXCO's or management's intentions, hopes, beliefs, expectations, representations, projections, estimations, plans or predictions of the future, are forward-looking statements and are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such statements include those relating to estimated financial results, or expected prices, production volumes, reserve levels and number of drilling locations. It is important to note that actual results may differ materially from the results predicted in any such forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that all forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainty, including without limitation, the costs of exploring and developing new oil and natural gas reserves, the price for which such reserves can be sold, environmental concerns effecting the drilling of oil and natural gas wells, as well as general market conditions, competition and pricing. More information about potential factors that could affect the company's operating and financial results is included in TXCO's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended Dec. 31, 2005 and its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2006. These reports and TXCO's previously filed documents are on file at the Securities and Exchange Commission and can be viewed on TXCO's Web site at www.txco.com, copies of which are available from the Company without charge.
Slide 3 - TXCO's Profile: Organic Growth - -     A Full-Cycle Exploration Company        -   Lease minerals        -   Acquire Seismic        -   Generate prospects        -   Drill        -    Produce - -     Multiple Resource Plays        -  1,000s of drilling prospects
Slide 4 - TXCO's Profile: Focused Growth Map of South Central United States of America with Maverick and Marfa Basins indicated. Maverick Basin - -     Core focus: 85% WI in 644,000 acres        -   Glen Rose Porosity oil play - -     99% of reserves -- 41.0 Bcfe        -   ~78% oil - -     Significant multi-play growth potential        -   Pearsall shale        -   San Miguel tar sand Marfa Basin - -     50% WI in 141,000 acres - -     Target: Barnett and Woodford shales - -     New resource play potential - -     First well now under way
Slide 5 - Maverick Basin Focus Area Map focusing in on TXCO's Maverick Basin lease area that indicates by shading the acreage covered by the EnCana joint venture and TXCO's Glen Rose/San Miguel acreage, as well as outlining the acreage covered by 3-D seismic data. - -   TXCO Acreage Block, 644,000 gross acres, 543,000 net acres - -   Over 90% 3-D seismic coverage - -   603,000 acres (940 sq. miles) of data
Slide 6 - Pipeline Marketing Synergy Map of pipeline superimposed over Maverick Basin lease map, indicating TXCO acreage, TXCO's Maverick-Dimmit Pipeline System, Area Pipelines, Compressor stations and Delivery points, as well as indicating the relative location of the Eagle Pass and Carrizo Springs communities and Mexico. - -     Strong infrastructure, 100% WI - -     Operational synergies - -     91-mile system provides:        -  Higher netback        -  U.S. / Mexico markets        -  Ongoing cost savings        -  Multiple delivery points - -     35 MMcfd current capacity - -     33% capacity utilization - -     100 MMcfd capacity potential - -     Enhanced basin-wide production monitoring
Slide 7 - Maverick Basin Cross Section Drawing showing the relative positions of the following geologic formations:  Escondido, Olmos / CBM, San Miguel, Anacacho, Austin Chalk, Eagle Ford, Buda, Del Rio, Georgetown, Pryor, McKnight, Glen Rose, Pearsall, Pine Island, Sligo, Hosston and Jurassic. The slide also indicates 9 of the formations as potential resource plays (those have been underlined above). - -     20+ Productive Zones, Thousands of Drilling Prospects
Slide 8 - Maverick Basin Core Focus Glen Rose Porosity Oil Play Picture of seismic data for a portion of the Maverick Basin lease with a span of 30 miles indicated with TXCO wells drilled for 2002 through 2005, 2006 wells, wells currently drilling, and 2006 focus areas indicated. - -    70 TXCO wells drilled since 2002 discovery - -    29 wells spud 2006 YTD - -    300+ potential drilling locations in inventory - -    Reserves targeted / well       -    EUR 140,000 Bbls - -    Drilling costs       -  Horizontal -- $1.0-1.25 million
Slide 9 - 3-D Seismic Imaging Defines Glen Rose Porosity Locations Close up of seismic data for a portion of the lease with Porosity 'pods' and existing wells and a 6-mile span indicated. - -    Enhanced seismic imaging improves well placement
Slide 10 - Glen Rose Porosity Production Type Curve -- Actual Line chart indicating production curves for the types of wells indicated in the table. Also marking each line with a star indicating the payout point. - -   GR Porosity Type Well EUR: 140,000 Bbls - -   Payout based on 36 MBbls @ $50 per Bbl Type                            No. Wells                 Cum Prod.              EUR*  Best Well                                                        292 MB             428 MB Horz >1,000' in Zone              4                      175 MB             229 MB Horz < 1000' in Zone              8                        77 MB             111 MB Vertical                                 17                        90 MB               95 MB Horz < 200' in Zone              12                        43 MB               45 MB Horz -- Not in Zone                4                        30 MB               37 MB   Total Commercial Wells      45 * Estimates prepared by independent reservoir engineers
Slide 11 - Glen Rose Porosity Oil Sales Show Continuing Rapid Growth Bar chart showing oil sales from the Glen Rose Porosity by quarter for the last six quarters, and range from 335 BOPD for second-quarter 2005 to 2,341 BOPD for third-quarter 2006. A 599% increase is indicated.
Slide 12 - Maverick Basin's Tar Sand Resource Play Map of Kinney, Maverick, Zavala and Dimmit Counties indicating the core area for San Miguel tar sand, primarily in northern Maverick County. - -   7-10 billion Bbls* estimated in place -- basin wide - -   Experienced Canadian partner -- Pearl E&P (50% WI)      -   Carried TXCO on first two wells and steam generation facilities - -   Analogous to Canadian Athabasca region's Cold Lake field - -   Current technologies, higher oil prices improve economics over 1970s-1980s Exxon and Conoco pilots * Revised internal estimates based on advanced geologic review
Slide 13 - Maverick Basin Tar Sand Pilot Picture of portable steam generator and water, oil and diluent tank battery. - -   Tar sand cyclic steaming now under way on initial 2 wells of a planned, 37-well pilot - -   Drilling scheduled during 2007 pending evaluation of initial steaming results
Slide 14 - Pearsall Shale Gas Resource Play Map of Maverick Basin lease area that indicates area prospective for Pearsall and areas where the rights to that formation are owned by TXCO or EnCana, and labeling location of EnCana's first well now in completion. - -   EnCana operator, 50% WI - -   Unconventional tight gas - -   Blanket presence - -   Overpressured formation - -   Underbalanced / horizontal drilling and fracturing - -   3-D seismic defined - -   Historical production averaged 400 MMcfe from 50+ vertical wells completed prior to 3-D seismic, underbalanced drilling, fracturing or stimulation techniques
Slide 15 - Pearsall Type Log From Existing Production Slide contains logs for the Los Cuatros Field (early 1970s). - -   20+ Bcfe production - -   Vertical wells - -   Prior to advanced completion and stimulation technology - -   Mud log confirms strong gas shows throughout Pearsall interval source rock - -   Known geochemistry:      -   High gas-in-place potential      -   Organically rich      -   Thermally mature in gas window
Slide 16 - TXCO's Other 2006 Maverick Basin Plays Drawing of geological formations with relative location of following plays indicated. San Miguel Waterflood - -   Sales = 171 BOPD (9 mo. '06) - -   120+ potential infill locations - -   2006 plan      -   $3 million CAPEX      -   15 wells drilled YTD (100% WI) Georgetown Formation - -   Gas and oil play - -   Sales = 67 BOEPD (9 mo. '06) - -   300+ potential drilling locations - -   2006 plan      -   $5.3 million CAPEX      -   10 wells (100% WI)           -   4 wells drilled YTD
Slide 17 - West Texas Shale Play Map of south central US, indicating the Ouachita and Appalachian Thrusts; the Marathon, Llano and Ozark uplifts; the Marfa, Delaware, Val Verde, Kerr, Fort Worth, Arkoma, and Black Warrior basins, and locations where Barnett, Woodford and Fayetteville Shales have been developed. Map also indicates location of the Maverick Basin. - -     Underexplored Marfa Basin lies along Ouachita Overthrust
Slide 18 - Marfa Basin Well Log Cross Section Copy of logs for Exxon's J.P. Kennedy #1, El Paso Natural Gas Co.'s Simpson #1 and Pure Oil Co's J.F. Lane #1 wells. Each log indicates the Pennsylvanian / Mississippian Gas-Bearing Shale Wedge (Barnett Shale), the Mississippian Lime, Woodford Shale and Devonian portions. - -   Wells logs from the 1960s-1970s confirm gas shows
Slide 19 - Marfa Basin Focus Area -     Underexplored Basin Along Ouachita Overthrust        -   Geologically Similar to Gas-Prone Fort Worth And Arkoma Basins - -     Excellent Geochemical Characteristics        -   Barnett and Woodford shales present        -   400' - 1,200' thick shales        -   High gas-in-place potential        -   Organically rich -- good TOC        -   Thermally mature in gas window - -     Initial Exploration / Development, 2H06        -   1st well currently testing, 2nd scheduled in early 2007 - -     Other Leading Shale Players in Adjacent Delaware Basin and / or Marfa Basin        -   EnCana, ConocoPhillips, EOG, Quicksilver, Carrizo, Petrohunt, etc.
Slide 20 - TXCO's Marfa Basin Lease Block Map of south central US indicating the location of the Marfa basin, with enlargement showing the TXCO, Quicksilver and Carrizo acreage (based on public filings) and the relative position of the Marfa and Alpine communities. Enlargement map indicates a 25-mile span. - -     TXCO acreage block acquired October 2005 - -     50% WI in 141,000 gross acres - -     Continental Resources operator
Slide 21 - Continuing Organic Reserve Growth Line chart shows reserves in Bcfe by formation in layers, by year for the period from 2001 to 2005, and at June 30, 2006, for: Glen Rose - oil; Glen Rose - gas; San Miguel - oil; Georgetown - gas; Georgetown - oil; Other Formations; and, Williston Basin - oil. The chart shows the growth in oil reserves from the San Miguel, and Glen Rose formations and the growth in gas reserves in the Glen Rose formations over the years. Also indicates a drop in gas reserves after the EnCana sale, with a 30% CAGR in proved reserves over the period presented. - -   June 30, 2006 proved reserves were 41.5 Bcfe -- 50% proved developed - -   9 mo. 2006 sales      -   Oil -- 588,000 Bbls (80%)      -   Gas -- 864 MMcf (20%) - -    Net of 1.4 Bcfe in proved reserves sold to EnCana, September 2005 See appendix for definitions
Slide 22 - Stronger Financial Metrics
Slide contains a data table and a bar chart entitled "Stockholder Equity Growing," as follows: Data table:    $ millions                                                                             9 mo. '06                            9 mo. '05 Capital Structure Cash                                                                                           $6.0                                $ 24.7 Bank Debt                                                                                     0.0                                    0.1 Stockholder Equity                                                                     126.8                                   76.2 Total Capitalization                                                                  $126.8                                $ 76.3 Credit Statistics Debt/Cap                                                                                    0.0%                                   0.1% Debt/Ebitda                                                                                 0.0x                                    0.0x Ebitda/Interest Expense                                                            149.0x                                    5.4x Debt/Proved Reserves                                                               $ 0.00                                 $ 0.00 The bar chart shows Stockholder Equity, "Debt-Bank and Other," and "Debt-Preferred Stock" by year for 2001 through 2005, and at September 30, 2006. Actual dollar amounts not indicated. Stockholder Equity in shown as growing steadily from under $25 million in 2001 to more than $125 million at September 30, 2006. Bank and Other debt is shown as growing from about $1 million in 2001 to almost $20 million in 2004, before being eliminated in 2005. Preferred Stock debt first appears in 2003 at about $16 million, which is also shown in 2004, and was eliminated in 2005.
Slide 23 - Key Metrics Demonstrate Stronger 2006 Results
($ in millions, except per share amounts)                                                          Net Change                                                                       9 mo. '06        9 mo. '05                $             %      Oil & Gas Sales                                              $ 44.4             $ 27.5              $ 16.9        +61%            Total Revenues                                               $ 57.2             $ 47.2              $ 10.0        +21%          Operating Income                                            $ 18.1             $  3.2               $ 14.9     +466%              Net Income *                                                  $ 11.6             $ 11.0              $   0.6         +5%           Earnings per Share *                                        $ 0.35             $ 0.38              $ 0.03          -8%             Ebitdax  **                                                      $ 32.0            $ 17.4              $ 14.6       +84%              Ebitda  **                                                        $ 31.1            $ 15.6              $ 15.5       +99%    *  2005 net income includes $24.5 million gain on EnCana sale      ** See Ebitda/Ebitdax reconciliation on TXCO's Web site
Slide 24 - Revised 2006 CAPEX Program
Slide contains a pie chart showing budget dollars, number of wells and, in some cases, % for focus areas and Other. The chart is titled "Target: 70 Wells" and shows activity and focus areas, as follows:        Glen Rose -- 44 wells, including 40 porosity wells -- $39 million -- 62%; Pearsall -- 1 Well -- $2        million; Georgetown -- 12 Wells -- $6.5 million; Seismic, Other -- $3.0 million; Pena Creek San        Miguel -- 15 Wells -- $4.5 million; Drilling Rig -- $5 million; Marfa -- 1 Well; and San        Miguel Tar Sand -- 10 Wells -- $3 million. - -   2006 CAPEX target:  $63 million +      -    54 wells YTD      -    $47 million YTD - -   Focus on Glen Rose Porosity oil play - -   2 rigs currently operating
Slide 25 - Key Indicators Confirm Growth
Slide contains a data box and three bar charts: - -   TXCO's Rolling 3-Year Metrics 2003 - 2005      -   Production Replacement - 220%      -   Drillbit Gross Profit ROI - 185%      -   Drillbit F&D Cost/Mcfe - $2.98       -  J.S. Herold's Smallcap Universe drillbit F&D cost/Mcfe:  $3.14 Chart 1 -- Bar chart indicating EBITDA, EBITDAX by year in millions for 2001 through 2005 and for 9 mo. 2006. Actual dollar amounts not indicated. EBITDA ranges from approximately $5 million in 2001 to more than $30 million in the 9 mo. 2006 period. EBITDAX ranges from under $10 million in 2001 to more than $30 million in the 9 mo. 2006 period. A CAGR of 38% is shown for Ebitda. Chart 2 -- Bar chart indicating Proved Reserves* in Bcfe by year for oil and gas for 2001 through 2005 and at June 30, 2006, as follows: Oil -- 2001 - 1.8, 2002 - 8.9, 2003 - 12.8, 2004 - 20.2, 2005 - 29.6, and 1H06 - 32.6; Gas -- 2001 - 11, 2002 - 14.7, 2003 - 15.6, 2004 - 17.7, 2005 - 9.9, and 1H06 - 8.9. Chart 3 -- Bar chart indicating Total Revenues by year for 2001 through 2005 and for 9 mo. 2006 in millions. Actual dollar amounts not shown. Ranges from about $14 million in 2001 to about $67 million in 2005. A CAGR of 49% is shown. *  Reflects sale to EnCana at Sept. 1, 2005
Slide 26 - TXCO's 1-Year Comparative Stock Performance
Line chart shows stock performance for TXCO, TXCO Peers, S&P 500 and Dow Jones weekly for late November 2005 through late November 2006. Beginning and ending prices labeled as $6.38 and $13.15, respectively. Sections are labeled, as follows: - -   January 2006 -- A.G. Edwards Coverage - -   April 2006 -- A.G. Edwards, BMO Capital Markets, C.K. Cooper Upgrades TXCO -- The Exploration Company; TXCO Peers -- BEXP, CRZO, CWEI, DBLE, EPEX, GSX, ABP, MCF, NGAS, PLLL, PQ; Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index; Dow Jones Industrial Average Source: Bloomberg
Slide 27 - Growing Share of Institutional Ownership Chart indicating number of institutional shareholders, by year from 2000 through present, with percentage of shares held by institutions indicated for 2002 and later periods, as follows: 2000 -- 1; 2001 -- 4; 2002 -- 21 -- 9%; 2003 -- 18 -- 14%; 2004 -- 29 -- 37%; 2005 -- 33 -- 39%; and 2006 to date -- 113 -- 54%. - -    Recently added to Russell 3000 Index and NASDAQ's Global Select Market - -    At November 2006:       -   33.1 million shares outstanding       -   $420 million market cap       -   410,000 shares, 3-month average daily volume       -   11% insider ownership
Slide 28 - Why Own TXCO Now? -    Dominate Position in the Maverick Basin         -   Growing Glen Rose Porosity oil sales       -   Multiple resource plays       -   1,000's of potential drilling locations       -   Integrated infrastructure - -    EnCana JV: Accelerates Growth, Validates Acreage Value - -    Three Potential Growth Catalysts Not Reflected in Current Share Price       -   San Miguel tar sand project       -   Pearsall shale play       -   Marfa Basin -- West Texas shale play - -    Exploration Team with Proven Track Record
Slide 29 - Continuing Growth Visit us on the Web at www.txco.com
Slide 30 - Appendix -   Acreage Position -- Gross / net mineral acres held under lease or option -   Average Daily Sales Volumes -- Sales volumes approximate field production volumes after the impact of fuel, shrink, venting and / or downtime related to pipeline curtailment, amine / processing plant capacity, weather, compression, or routine repairs and maintenance. - -   Bbls -- Barrels of oil. - -   BOPD / BOEPD -- Barrels of oil per day / Barrels of oil equivalent per day - -   CAGR -- Compound annual growth rate - -   Cash Flows -- Net cash provided by operating activities - -   Debt-to-Capitalization Ratio -- Total debt over (total debt plus total stockholder equity) - -   Drillbit Finding and Development Costs -- Per Mcfe, including exploration costs and actual drilling costs incurred compared to the volume of new reserves added, prior to any revisions in engineering estimates. - -   Ebitdax and Ebitda -- See the Investor Relations section of the Company's Web site at www.txco.com for a reconciliation of non-GAAP financial measures. - -   Enterprise Value -- Diluted shares (assuming exercise of all outstanding options and warrants), times share price, plus debt, plus preferred equity, less cash and equivalents. - -   EUR -- Estimated ultimate recovery, as estimated by independent reservoir engineers. - -   Gross Profit -- Oil and gas revenues less operating expenses and G&A costs - -   Gross Profit Return on Investment -- Gross Profit divided by Finding and Development Costs - -   MBbls / MMBbls - Thousand / million barrels of oil - -   Mcf -- Thousand cubic feet of gas - -   MMcfd -- Million cubic feet of gas per day - -   Mcfe / MMcfe / Bcfe / Tcfe -- Thousand cubic feet equivalent / Million cubic feet equivalent / Billion cubic feet equivalent / Trillion cubic feet equivalent - -   Proved Reserves -- Interim estimates internally generated. Year-end estimates prepared by independent reservoir engineers. Reserve estimates prepared in accordance with SEC and FASB requirements. - -   ROI -- Return on investment - -   TOC -- Total organic carbon present in a formation. A basic chemical analysis of source rock. - -   WI -- Working interest