UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES

Investment Company Act File Number: 811-02958

T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)

100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202

(Address of principal executive offices)

David Oestreicher

100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, MD 21202

(Name and address of agent for service)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (410) 345-2000

Date of fiscal year end: October 31

Date of reporting period: October 31, 2016

Item 1. Report to Shareholders

Overseas Stock Fund October 31, 2016

The views and opinions in this report were current as of October 31, 2016. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the fund’s future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.

REPORTS ON THE WEB

Sign up for our Email Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.

Manager’s Letter

Fellow Shareholders

Stocks in international developed markets fell modestly for the 12 months ended October 31, 2016. European markets tumbled in the immediate wake of the UK’s surprising June decision to leave the European Union (EU). Markets largely recovered amid optimism about the potential for expanded fiscal and monetary stimulus measures before settling lower again at the period’s end as the limited ability of most developed countries to implement such stimulus measures sunk in to investors. Japan’s market scored modest overall gains, buoyed by renewed stimulus measures and a new effort by the Bank of Japan (BoJ) to target the yield on the 10-year Japanese government bond in the latter half of the reporting period. Emerging markets rose nicely as prices for energy and other commodities stabilized and China’s efforts to engineer an orderly economic slowdown continued.

As shown in the Performance Comparison table, your fund returned 1.67% and -1.97% for the six and 12 months ended October 31, 2016, respectively. (Performance for Advisor and I Class shares may vary due to their different fee structures.) The fund outperformed the MSCI EAFE Index and its Lipper peer group average for both periods. The fund’s sector performance for the annual reporting period was mixed. Our materials and information technology stocks generated strong double-digit absolute gains, while our industrials and business services and energy holdings rose more modestly. The consumer staples sector was roughly flat, and the remaining sectors declined, with consumer discretionary, utilities, and health care posting the steepest losses. Our sector weights detracted from performance versus the MSCI EAFE Index, but this was more than offset by positive security selection.

MARKET ENVIRONMENT

European shares fell in the opening months of 2016 as commodities prices weakened and global economic growth slowed. Markets rallied in March in the wake of a significant expansion of the European Central Bank’s (ECB) monetary stimulus, stabilization of energy and commodities prices, and reduced expectations for the timing and pace of Federal Reserve (Fed) rate hikes in 2016. The market environment in June was dominated by macroeconomic events, culminating in the UK’s momentous decision to exit the EU. The Brexit vote took most observers by surprise, and equity markets tumbled in its immediate aftermath. Sentiment firmed, however, and European equities recovered most of the lost ground due to optimism that policymakers in Europe and abroad would use whatever monetary and fiscal tools necessary to support growth. However, momentum faltered again in the period’s closing months due to rising concerns that central banks and debt-laden governments in the world’s developed markets might have reached a limit in their ability to provide effective stimulus. Despite concerns surrounding Brexit and uncertainty about its longer-term implications, underlying data continued to show modest growth in Europe’s economy.

Japanese equities ended the 12-month reporting period with modest gains as positive results over the closing six months helped to overcome losses in the opening half of the period. Over the summer, Prime Minister Abe announced a ¥28 trillion stimulus package in his government’s latest effort to boost economic growth and inflation. In September, the BoJ announced a new focus on targeting yield levels to fend off criticism that its policies were negatively impacting long-term interest rates and crushing bank profits. In addition, the central bank again extended the time line for reaching its 2% inflation target, which is now pushed into 2018. Japan’s economy remains challenged by still-weak consumption, tepid wage growth, low inflation, and renewed pressures on exports caused by a stronger yen.

Emerging markets stocks rose more than 9% overall for the annual reporting period, helped by stabilization in prices for oil and other commodities. Signs of steady economic growth in China and the continuation of accommodative monetary policies across most of the developed world were also supportive. Markets in Latin America registered the largest overall gains, led by Brazil, Peru, and Chile. Emerging Asian markets returned approximately 7% in aggregate, with Indonesia, Taiwan, and Thailand posting the strongest returns. China gained just under 2% for the 12-month period. Policymakers appear to be managing the country’s economic transition to a consumer-driven model, and we expect they will pull whatever levers are necessary—potentially at the expense of future policy flexibility—to maintain steady growth ahead of the next Congress of the Communist Party of China, expected to be held in the autumn of 2017.

Currency performance was largely mixed. The Japanese yen appreciated nearly 15% versus the U.S. dollar over the 12-month period, while the euro declined approximately 1%. The British pound sterling lost approximately 21% of its value versus the dollar, with the lion’s share of the losses coming in the latter half of the reporting period as the currency came under heavy pressure due to Brexit-related concerns.

PORTFOLIO HIGHLIGHTS AND POSITIONING

Our materials stocks generated the fund’s largest absolute gains for the 12-month reporting period as commodities prices stabilized after a prolonged and painful downturn in 2015. We remain underweight the sector versus our MSCI benchmark, however, due to our concerns about the long-term supply/demand imbalance across much of the global commodities complex. Umicore (Belgium) benefited from improved investor sentiment as metals prices rebounded and was among our top contributors. The company has transformed itself from a capital-intensive metals refiner to a metallurgical science and technology company with leading positions in automotive catalysts, rechargeable batteries, and metals recycling. A recently initiated position in Covestro (Germany), a spinoff from Bayer, benefited from signs of a turnaround in plastics markets and from good cash flows that helped to reduce investor concerns about the company’s debt load. Gold miner Agnico Eagle Mines (Canada) was a strong contributor as gold prices rallied, but we believe better risk/reward opportunities may be found elsewhere and eliminated our position. We established positions in industrial gas distributor Air Liquide (France) and forest products company Stora Enso (Finland). Air Liquide’s stock was punished in the wake of its acquisition of U.S.-based Airgas. However, we believe the Airgas transaction will enhance Air Liquide’s position in the U.S. market. Further, the market does not appear to be adequately accounting for potential cost savings and other synergies arising from the deal. Stora Enso should benefit over the long term as the company shifts its focus from traditional lower-growth, lower-margin paper businesses toward higher-growth, higher-margin cardboard and packaging products. (Please refer to the fund’s portfolio of investments for a complete list of holdings and the amount each represents in the portfolio.)

Our information technology stocks rose by double digits for the period. We are overweight this sector versus the benchmark as we look for growth opportunities in companies able to leverage game-changing technology and processes to disrupt traditional industries and gain market share. The semiconductor industry is one area of focus. Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (Taiwan) was the fund’s top overall contributor. TSMC continues to build on its track record of exceptional execution as the world’s leading logic chip foundry, and we expect it to continue to outgrow the industry with its superior technical capability and scale. Semiconductor equipment manufacturer Tokyo Electron (Japan) was another strong performer. The company makes equipment used by other companies to make computer chips and digital displays, including cutting-edge organic light emitting diode (OLED) displays, and benefited from strong manufacturer demand. Tencent Holdings (China) and Alibaba Group Holding (China) were top-10 contributors, both benefiting from their dominant positions in China’s large and growing markets for social networking and e-commerce, respectively. Wireless infrastructure provider LM Ericsson (Sweden) weighed on results as the company’s restructuring efforts continue to lag its difficult end markets. We eliminated stylus maker Wacom (Japan) and office equipment and camera manufacturer Canon (Japan) due to concerns about the tepid long-term growth opportunities in their respective businesses.

Industrials and business services stocks were solid gainers for the portfolio, and our emphasis on identifying promising restructuring stories in the sector benefited results. Global electronics conglomerate Mitsubishi Electric (Japan) performed well over the last 12 months despite the headwinds posed by a stronger yen as management continues to reinvest in higher-margin businesses and deemphasize lower-growth, lower-return segments. Industrial conglomerate Siemens (Germany) was among the portfolio’s top contributors as CEO Joe Kaeser’s ongoing restructuring efforts continue to bear fruit. Koninklijke Philips (Netherlands) gained on reasonable growth in its core businesses and efforts to cut costs and improve efficiencies. Global shipping conglomerate Maersk (Denmark) detracted from results for the period as slowing global economic growth weighed on global trade expectations. However, the company is one of the most efficient in the industry and enjoys a reputation for superior capital allocation. Maersk generates good cash flow even in the current challenging economic environment and is in the process of splitting the company to better focus on its two main businesses: shipping and oil. We took advantage of attractive valuations to establish a position in Meggitt (UK), a high-quality aircraft component manufacturer with leading positions in both the commercial and defense aerospace markets.

Our consumer discretionary holdings declined for the period. Communications satellite operator Eutelsat Communications (France) fell after earnings surprised on the downside. However, the company operates in a high-return business with significant barriers to entry and should rebound as it gradually reduces excess capacity. Sky (UK)—the leading pay TV platform in the UK, Germany, and Italy—fell amid concerns about growing competition in the digital delivery space. As with many UK stocks, concerns about economic growth and a plunging currency in the wake of Brexit also weighed heavily on the share price. However, we continue to hold the stock given its favorable valuation, attractive dividend yield, and upside potential once Brexit uncertainties recede. British retailer Marks & Spencer Group declined on similar Brexit-related economic and currency concerns. Automobile component supplier Aisin Seiki (Japan), the world’s largest manufacturer of automatic transmissions, was a bright spot in the sector due to strong demand from China. Compass Group (UK), a leading global player in outsourced institutional food services, was another positive contributor. The company generates a large portion of revenues outside the UK, helping to insulate it from the British pound’s recent weakness, and a strong management team has consistently improved the company’s capital allocation over recent years.

Health care was the portfolio’s weakest sector. Pharmaceutical firms struggled for much of the period amid concerns about heightened pricing pressure, particularly in the U.S. Bayer (Germany) was further challenged by investors’ poor reception of its bid to acquire U.S.-based seed and herbicide company Monsanto in early 2016. We believe Monsanto is an excellent strategic fit for Bayer, although the market has concerns about the agricultural cycle. The fundamentals in Bayer’s core pharmaceutical business continue to look positive, and the stock is attractive at current valuations given its longer-term growth potential. Swiss pharmaceutical firm Novartis weighed heavily on performance amid disappointing initial sales of an important heart drug and poor results at its U.S.-based Alcon eye care division. Sanofi (France) struggled with pricing in its diabetes franchise, but the company’s new cholesterol treatment is in trials and, if successful, should help drive growth into 2018 and beyond. On a positive note, shares of health care service provider Fresenius (Germany) rose on good results in its hospital management, medical nutrition, and dialysis businesses, and Japanese pharmaceutical firm Astellas Pharma gained on strength in a key prostate cancer drug.

From a geographic perspective, the portfolio remains focused on Europe. Our UK allocation stood at approximately 19% at the end of the period versus 21% in our semiannual letter six months ago. Despite the uncertainties surrounding the political process of separating the UK from the EU, we continue to find a number of high-quality companies in the UK with shareholder-friendly management operating in a generally business-friendly environment. We also have sizable allocations to France, Germany, Switzerland, and the Scandinavian countries, including Sweden, Denmark, and Norway.

Japan represents about 22% of the portfolio, up from approximately 19% six months ago. We continue to find company-specific opportunities regardless of the country’s growth-challenged economic backdrop, and we are encouraged that incentives for Japanese companies to focus on profitability and shareholder returns appear to be gaining some traction among corporate management. Our overall position is tempered, however, by demographically driven concerns about sluggish economic growth and the government’s ability to execute on a long list of outstanding structural reforms.

The Pacific Rim accounts for a significant portion of the portfolio, with Australia, Singapore, and Hong Kong among our more substantial allocations. Emerging markets account for approximately 5% of the portfolio.

As always, we remind our shareholders that decisions about country and sector allocations do not play a primary role in our investment approach. Rather, we believe opportunities arise at the individual company level, and, as a result, we continue to build and manage our portfolio one stock at a time.

INVESTMENT OUTLOOK

The UK’s June decision to leave the EU is a pivotal event for Europe, but Brexit is likely to be a long and complex process fraught with unforeseen contingencies. As a result, the full breadth and depth of its impact will take some time to unfold. In addition, immigration and economic concerns are fueling a rise in populism throughout the region, which could complicate political efforts to address longstanding structural challenges in specific countries and across the region. Europe’s economic recovery appears to be muddling ahead, with recent data suggesting small improvements in manufacturing, inflation, and consumer confidence.

The outlook for Japan is uncertain as several years of loose monetary policy and attempts at structural reform have produced mixed results. On the plus side, corporate governance has improved, and a more shareholder-friendly approach has helped to increase returns at some companies. The aggressive monetary stimulus has successfully driven up prices for some imported goods, but Japan’s growth and inflation levels remain disappointing. The yen’s recent strength despite aggressive easing has cast doubt on the ability of the central bank to effect change through monetary policy.

Emerging markets have recorded strong overall gains so far in 2016, but we believe a selective approach is warranted in light of mixed valuations and challenging fundamentals in some countries. Although China has a number of long-term risks stemming from its autocratic political system, relative lack of transparency, significant debt, and other demographic and social factors, policymakers have many levers to pull to maintain growth, and the challenges appear manageable for now. China has a very strong entrepreneurial spirit, and we are finding a number of attractive growth opportunities, including innovative, nimble companies that are able to grow from the ground up and take market share from larger, more traditional firms.

It’s become more difficult for equity investors to find growth opportunities against a backdrop of muted economic growth in the developed world and decelerating growth in key emerging economies. However, we believe an active investment approach with an emphasis on selectivity can help to isolate quality stocks with solid, company-specific growth prospects and to avoid “value traps” in discounted stocks of companies that are unable to keep pace in a rapidly changing world. We will continue to rely on our global research platform to uncover compelling opportunities with a focus on companies that are able to grow earnings and cash flow through superior business models and disciplined capital allocation.

Respectfully submitted,

Raymond A. Mills
Chairman of the fund’s Investment Advisory Committee

November 17, 2016

The committee chairman has day-to-day responsibility for managing the portfolio and works with committee members in developing and executing the fund’s investment program.

RISKS OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTING

Funds that invest overseas generally carry more risk than funds that invest strictly in U.S. assets. Funds investing in a single country or in a limited geographic region tend to be riskier than more diversified funds. Risks can result from varying stages of economic and political development; differing regulatory environments, trading days, and accounting standards; and higher transaction costs of non-U.S. markets. Non-U.S. investments are also subject to currency risk, or a decline in the value of a foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar, which reduces the dollar value of securities denominated in that currency.

GLOSSARY

Lipper averages: The averages of available mutual fund performance returns for specified time periods in categories defined by Lipper Inc.

MSCI EAFE Index: An index that measures equity market performance of developed countries in the Europe, Australasia, and Far East regions.

Note: MSCI makes no express or implied warranties or representations and shall have no liability whatsoever with respect to any MSCI data contained herein. The MSCI data may not be further redistributed or used as a basis for other indices or any securities or financial products. This report is not approved, reviewed, or produced by MSCI.

Performance and Expenses

Growth of $10,000

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.

Fund Expense Example

As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.

Please note that the fund has three share classes: The original share class (Investor Class) charges no distribution and service (12b-1) fee, the Advisor Class shares are offered only through unaffiliated brokers and other financial intermediaries and charge a 0.25% 12b-1 fee, and I Class shares are available to institutionally oriented clients and impose no 12b-1 or administrative fee payment. Each share class is presented separately in the table.

Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (Actual) provides information about actual account values and expenses based on the fund’s actual returns. You may use the information on this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number on the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (Hypothetical) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.

Note: T. Rowe Price charges an annual account service fee of $20, generally for accounts with less than $10,000. The fee is waived for any investor whose T. Rowe Price mutual fund accounts total $50,000 or more; accounts electing to receive electronic delivery of account statements, transaction confirmations, prospectuses, and shareholder reports; or accounts of an investor who is a T. Rowe Price Preferred Services, Personal Services, or Enhanced Personal Services client (enrollment in these programs generally requires T. Rowe Price assets of at least $100,000). This fee is not included in the accompanying table. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.

You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Notes to Financial Statements

T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc. (the fund), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act) as a diversified, open-end management investment company. The Overseas Stock Fund (the fund) is a diversified, open-end management investment company established by the corporation. The fund seeks long-term growth of capital through investments in the common stocks of non-U.S. companies. The fund has three classes of shares: the Overseas Stock Fund (Investor Class), the Overseas Stock Fund–Advisor Class (Advisor Class), and the Overseas Stock Fund–I Class (I Class). Advisor Class shares are sold only through unaffiliated brokers and other unaffiliated financial intermediaries. I Class shares generally are available only to investors meeting a $1,000,000 minimum investment or certain other criteria. The Advisor Class operates under a Board-approved Rule 12b-1 plan pursuant to which the class compensates financial intermediaries for distribution, shareholder servicing, and/or certain administrative services; the Investor and I Classes do not pay Rule 12b-1 fees. Each class has exclusive voting rights on matters related solely to that class; separate voting rights on matters that relate to all classes; and, in all other respects, the same rights and obligations as the other classes.

NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Preparation The fund is an investment company and follows accounting and reporting guidance in the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification Topic 946 (ASC 946). The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), including, but not limited to, ASC 946. GAAP requires the use of estimates made by management. Management believes that estimates and valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the valuations reflected in the accompanying financial statements may differ from the value ultimately realized upon sale or maturity.

Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income tax-related interest and penalties, if incurred, would be recorded as income tax expense. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Income distributions are declared and paid by each class annually. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Capital gain distributions are generally declared and paid by the fund annually.

Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.

Class Accounting Shareholder servicing, prospectus, and shareholder report expenses incurred by each class are charged directly to the class to which they relate. Expenses common to all classes, investment income, and realized and unrealized gains and losses are allocated to the classes based upon the relative daily net assets of each class. The Advisor Class pays Rule 12b-1 fees, in an amount not exceeding 0.25% of the class’s average daily net assets.

Redemption Fees A 2% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held for 90 days or less to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.

In-Kind Redemptions In accordance with guidelines described in the fund’s prospectus, and when considered to be in the best interest of all shareholders, the fund may distribute portfolio securities rather than cash as payment for a redemption of fund shares (in-kind redemption). Gains and losses realized on in-kind redemptions are not recognized for tax purposes and are reclassified from undistributed realized gain (loss) to paid-in capital. During the year ended October 31, 2016, the fund realized $45,712,000 of net gain on $181,287,000 of in-kind redemptions.

New Accounting Guidance In October 2016, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) issued a new rule, Investment Company Reporting Modernization, which, among other provisions, amends Regulation S-X to require standardized, enhanced disclosures, particularly related to derivatives, in investment company financial statements. Compliance with the guidance is required for financial statements filed with the SEC on or after August 1, 2017; adoption will have no effect on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.

NOTE 2 - VALUATION

The fund’s financial instruments are valued and each class’s net asset value (NAV) per share is computed at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day the NYSE is open for business. However, the NAV per share may be calculated at a time other than the normal close of the NYSE if trading on the NYSE is restricted, if the NYSE closes earlier, or as may be permitted by the SEC.

Fair Value The fund’s financial instruments are reported at fair value, which GAAP defines as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee (the Valuation Committee) is an internal committee that has been delegated certain responsibilities by the fund’s Board of Directors (the Board) to ensure that financial instruments are appropriately priced at fair value in accordance with GAAP and the 1940 Act. Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee develops and oversees pricing-related policies and procedures and approves all fair value determinations. Specifically, the Valuation Committee establishes procedures to value securities; determines pricing techniques, sources, and persons eligible to effect fair value pricing actions; oversees the selection, services, and performance of pricing vendors; oversees valuation-related business continuity practices; and provides guidance on internal controls and valuation-related matters. The Valuation Committee reports to the Board and has representation from legal, portfolio management and trading, operations, risk management, and the fund’s treasurer.

Various valuation techniques and inputs are used to determine the fair value of financial instruments. GAAP establishes the following fair value hierarchy that categorizes the inputs used to measure fair value:

Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical financial instruments that the fund can access at the reporting date

Level 2 – inputs other than Level 1 quoted prices that are observable, either directly or indirectly (including, but not limited to, quoted prices for similar financial instruments in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar financial instruments in inactive markets, interest rates and yield curves, implied volatilities, and credit spreads)

Level 3 – unobservable inputs

Observable inputs are developed using market data, such as publicly available information about actual events or transactions, and reflect the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. Unobservable inputs are those for which market data are not available and are developed using the best information available about the assumptions that market participants would use to price the financial instrument. GAAP requires valuation techniques to maximize the use of relevant observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. When multiple inputs are used to derive fair value, the financial instrument is assigned to the level within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest-level input that is significant to the fair value of the financial instrument. Input levels are not necessarily an indication of the risk or liquidity associated with financial instruments at that level but rather the degree of judgment used in determining those values.

Valuation Techniques Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made. OTC Bulletin Board securities are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the closing bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale or closing price for international securities.

For valuation purposes, the last quoted prices of non-U.S. equity securities may be adjusted to reflect the fair value of such securities at the close of the NYSE. If the fund determines that developments between the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will, in its judgment, materially affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, the fund will adjust the previous quoted prices to reflect what it believes to be the fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE. In deciding whether it is necessary to adjust quoted prices to reflect fair value, the fund reviews a variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S. markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. The fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. The fund uses outside pricing services to provide it with quoted prices and information to evaluate or adjust those prices. The fund cannot predict how often it will use quoted prices and how often it will determine it necessary to adjust those prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its security valuation process, the fund routinely compares quoted prices, the next day’s opening prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices.

Actively traded equity securities listed on a domestic exchange generally are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Non-U.S. equity securities generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy despite the availability of quoted prices because, as described above, the fund evaluates and determines whether those quoted prices reflect fair value at the close of the NYSE or require adjustment. OTC Bulletin Board securities, certain preferred securities, and equity securities traded in inactive markets generally are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual fund’s closing NAV per share on the day of valuation and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Assets and liabilities other than financial instruments, including short-term receivables and payables, are carried at cost, or estimated realizable value, if less, which approximates fair value.

Thinly traded financial instruments and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the Valuation Committee. The objective of any fair value pricing determination is to arrive at a price that could reasonably be expected from a current sale. Financial instruments fair valued by the Valuation Committee are primarily private placements, restricted securities, warrants, rights, and other securities that are not publicly traded.

Subject to oversight by the Board, the Valuation Committee regularly makes good faith judgments to establish and adjust the fair valuations of certain securities as events occur and circumstances warrant. For instance, in determining the fair value of an equity investment with limited market activity, such as a private placement or a thinly traded public company stock, the Valuation Committee considers a variety of factors, which may include, but are not limited to, the issuer’s business prospects, its financial standing and performance, recent investment transactions in the issuer, new rounds of financing, negotiated transactions of significant size between other investors in the company, relevant market valuations of peer companies, strategic events affecting the company, market liquidity for the issuer, and general economic conditions and events. In consultation with the investment and pricing teams, the Valuation Committee will determine an appropriate valuation technique based on available information, which may include both observable and unobservable inputs. The Valuation Committee typically will afford greatest weight to actual prices in arm’s length transactions, to the extent they represent orderly transactions between market participants, transaction information can be reliably obtained, and prices are deemed representative of fair value. However, the Valuation Committee may also consider other valuation methods such as market-based valuation multiples; a discount or premium from market value of a similar, freely traded security of the same issuer; or some combination. Fair value determinations are reviewed on a regular basis and updated as information becomes available, including actual purchase and sale transactions of the issue. Because any fair value determination involves a significant amount of judgment, there is a degree of subjectivity inherent in such pricing decisions, and fair value prices determined by the Valuation Committee could differ from those of other market participants. Depending on the relative significance of unobservable inputs, including the valuation technique(s) used, fair valued securities may be categorized in Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Valuation Inputs The following table summarizes the fund’s financial instruments, based on the inputs used to determine their fair values on October 31, 2016:

There were no material transfers between Levels 1 and 2 during the year ended October 31, 2016.

NOTE 3 - OTHER INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks and/or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the fund’s prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

Securities Lending The fund may lend its securities to approved brokers to earn additional income. Its securities lending activities are administered by a lending agent in accordance with a securities lending agreement. Security loans generally do not have stated maturity dates, and the fund may recall a security at any time. The fund receives collateral in the form of cash or U.S. government securities, valued at 102% to 105% of the value of the securities on loan. Collateral is maintained over the life of the loan in an amount not less than the value of loaned securities; any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is delivered to the fund the next business day. Cash collateral is invested by the lending agent(s) in accordance with investment guidelines approved by fund management. Additionally, the lending agent indemnifies the fund against losses resulting from borrower default. Although risk is mitigated by the collateral and indemnification, the fund could experience a delay in recovering its securities and a possible loss of income or value if the borrower fails to return the securities, collateral investments decline in value, and the lending agent fails to perform. Securities lending revenue consists of earnings on invested collateral and borrowing fees, net of any rebates to the borrower, compensation to the lending agent, and other administrative costs. In accordance with GAAP, investments made with cash collateral are reflected in the accompanying financial statements, but collateral received in the form of securities is not. At October 31, 2016, the value of loaned securities was $167,584,000, including securities sold but not yet settled, which are not reflected in the accompanying Portfolio of Investments; the value of cash collateral and related investments was $175,088,000.

Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities other than short-term securities aggregated $2,859,568,000 and $1,520,036,000, respectively, for the year ended October 31, 2016.

NOTE 4 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Distributions determined in accordance with federal income tax regulations may differ in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character but are not adjusted for temporary differences.

The fund files U.S. federal, state, and local tax returns as required. The fund’s tax returns are subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities until expiration of the applicable statute of limitations, which is generally three years after the filing of the tax return but which can be extended to six years in certain circumstances. Tax returns for open years have incorporated no uncertain tax positions that require a provision for income taxes.

Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to expiring capital loss carryforwards and redemptions in kind. Reclassifications between income and gain relate primarily to the character of income on passive foreign investment companies. For the year ended October 31, 2016, the following reclassifications were recorded to reflect tax character (there was no impact on results of operations or net assets):

Distributions during the years ended October 31, 2016 and October 31, 2015, totaled $229,228,000 and $263,120,000, respectively, and were characterized as ordinary income for tax purposes. At October 31, 2016, the tax-basis cost of investments and components of net assets were as follows:

The difference between book-basis and tax-basis net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) is attributable to the deferral of losses from wash sales for tax purposes. The fund intends to retain realized gains to the extent of available capital loss carryforwards. Because the fund is required to use capital loss carryforwards that do not expire before those with expiration dates, all or a portion of its capital loss carryforwards subject to expiration could ultimately go unused. During the year ended October 31, 2016, the fund utilized $4,223,000 of capital loss carryforwards. The fund’s available capital loss carryforwards as of October 31, 2016, expire as follows: $219,677,000 in fiscal 2017, $35,537,000 in fiscal 2018, and $14,917,000 in fiscal 2019; $122,290,000 have no expiration.

NOTE 5 - FOREIGN TAXES

The fund is subject to foreign income taxes imposed by certain countries in which it invests. Additionally, certain foreign currency transactions are subject to tax, and capital gains realized upon disposition of securities issued in or by certain foreign countries are subject to capital gains tax imposed by those countries. All taxes are computed in accordance with the applicable foreign tax law, and, to the extent permitted, capital losses are used to offset capital gains. Taxes attributable to income are accrued by the fund as a reduction of income. Taxes incurred on the purchase of foreign currencies are recorded as realized loss on foreign currency transactions. Current and deferred tax expense attributable to capital gains is reflected as a component of realized or change in unrealized gain/loss on securities in the accompanying financial statements. At October 31, 2016, the fund had no deferred tax liability attributable to foreign securities and no foreign capital loss carryforwards.

NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (Price Group). The investment management agreement between the fund and Price Associates provides for an annual investment management fee, which is computed daily and paid monthly. The fee consists of an individual fund fee, equal to 0.35% of the fund’s average daily net assets, and a group fee. The group fee rate is calculated based on the combined net assets of certain mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (the group) applied to a graduated fee schedule, with rates ranging from 0.48% for the first $1 billion of assets to 0.275% for assets in excess of $500 billion. The fund’s group fee is determined by applying the group fee rate to the fund’s average daily net assets. At October 31, 2016, the effective annual group fee rate was 0.29%.

The Advisor Class is subject to a contractual expense limitation through February 28, 2018. During the limitation period, Price Associates is required to waive its management fee or pay any expenses, excluding interest, taxes, brokerage commissions, and other non-recurring expenses permitted by the investment management agreement, that would otherwise cause the class’s ratio of annualized total expenses to average net assets (expense ratio) to exceed its expense limitation of 1.10%. The class is required to repay Price Associates for expenses previously waived/paid to the extent the class’s net assets grow or expenses decline sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the class’s expense ratio to exceed its expense limitation in effect at the time of the waiver. However, no repayment will be made more than three years after the date of a payment or waiver.

The I Class is also subject to an operating expense limitation (I Class limit) pursuant to which Price Associates is contractually required to pay all operating expenses of the I Class, excluding management fees, interest, borrowing-related expenses, taxes, brokerage commissions, and other non-recurring expenses permitted by the investment management agreement, to the extent such operating expenses, on an annualized basis, exceed 0.05% of average net assets. This agreement will continue until February 28, 2018, and may be renewed, revised, or revoked only with approval of the fund’s Board. The I Class is required to repay Price Associates for expenses previously paid to the extent the class’s net assets grow or expenses decline sufficiently to allow repayment without causing the class’s operating expenses to exceed the I Class limit in effect at the time of the waiver. However, no repayment will be made more than three years after the date of a payment or waiver. For the year ended October 31, 2016, the I Class operated below its expense limitation.

Pursuant to these agreements, $2,000 of expenses were waived/paid by Price Associates during the year ended October 31, 2016. Including these amounts, expenses previously waived/paid by Price Associates in the amount of $2,000 remain subject to repayment by the fund at October 31, 2016.

In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and two wholly owned subsidiaries of Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates provides certain accounting and administrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the fund’s transfer and dividend-disbursing agent. T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., provides subaccounting and recordkeeping services for certain retirement accounts invested in the Investor Class and I Class. For the year ended October 31, 2016, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $60,000 for Price Associates; $298,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.; and $39,000 for T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period-end pursuant to these service agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements.

Additionally, the fund is one of several mutual funds in which certain college savings plans managed by Price Associates may invest. As approved by the fund’s Board of Directors, shareholder servicing costs associated with each college savings plan are borne by the fund in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the college savings plan. For the year ended October 31, 2016, the fund was charged $631,000 for shareholder servicing costs related to the college savings plans, of which $538,000 was for services provided by Price. The amount payable at period-end pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At October 31, 2016, approximately 3% of the outstanding shares of the Investor Class were held by college savings plans.

The fund is also one of several mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (underlying Price funds) in which the T. Rowe Price Retirement Funds (Retirement Funds) and/or T. Rowe Price Target Funds (Target Funds) may invest. None of the Retirement Funds, or Target Funds invest in the underlying Price funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. Pursuant to a special servicing agreement, expenses associated with the operation of the Retirement Funds are borne by each underlying Price fund to the extent of estimated savings to it and in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the Retirement Funds. Prior to February 1, 2016, the Target Funds were subject to the same special servicing agreement; thus expenses associated with the operation of the Target Funds prior to that date were borne by the underlying Price Funds. Effective February 1, 2016, expenses associated with the operation of the Target Funds are borne by the Target Funds. Expenses allocated under this agreement are reflected as shareholder servicing expense in the accompanying financial statements. For the year ended October 31,2016, the fund was allocated $16,990,000 of Retirement Funds’ expenses and $61,000 of Target Funds’ expenses. Of these amounts, $6,633,000 related to services provided by Price. At period-end, the amount payable to Price pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At October 31, 2016, approximately 87% of the outstanding shares of the Investor Class were held by the Retirement Funds and 5% of the outstanding shares of the I Class were held by the Target Funds.

In addition, other mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates (collectively, Price funds and accounts) may invest in the fund and are not subject to a special servicing agreement disclosed above. No Price fund or account may invest for the purpose of exercising management or control over the fund. At October 31, 2016, approximately 39% of the I Class’s outstanding shares were held by Price funds and accounts.

The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Fund, the T. Rowe Price Treasury Reserve Fund, or the T. Rowe Price Short-Term Fund (collectively, the Price Reserve Investment Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and considered affiliates of the fund. The Price Reserve Investment Funds are offered as short-term investment options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates or its affiliates and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The Price Reserve Investment Funds pay no investment management fees.

As of October 31, 2016, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., or its wholly owned subsidiaries owned 26,316 shares of the Advisor Class, representing 29% of the Advisor Class’s net assets.

The fund may participate in securities purchase and sale transactions with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates (cross trades), in accordance with procedures adopted by the fund’s Board and Securities and Exchange Commission rules, which require, among other things, that such purchase and sale cross trades be effected at the independent current market price of the security. During the year ended October 31, 2016, the fund had no purchases or sales cross trades with other funds or accounts advised by Price Associates.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc. and
Shareholders of T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the T. Rowe Price Overseas Stock Fund (one of the portfolios comprising T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc., hereafter referred to as the “Fund”) at October 31, 2016, the results of its operations, the changes in its net assets and the financial highlights for each of the periods indicated therein, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the Fund’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at October 31, 2016 by correspondence with the custodian, and confirmation of the underlying funds by correspondence with the transfer agent, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
December 15, 2016

Tax Information (Unaudited) for the Tax Year Ended 10/31/16

We are providing this information as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial reporting requirements.

For taxable non-corporate shareholders, $261,968,000 of the fund’s income represents qualified dividend income subject to a long-term capital gains tax rate of not greater than 20%.

For corporate shareholders, $544,000 of the fund’s income qualifies for the dividends-received deduction.

The fund will pass through foreign source income of $270,217,000 and foreign taxes paid of $20,128,000.

Information on Proxy Voting Policies, Procedures, and Records

A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information. You may request this document by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s website, sec.gov.

The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our corporate website. To access it, please visit the following Web page:

https://www3.troweprice.com/usis/corporate/en/utility/policies.html

Scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, “Proxy Voting Policies.” Click on the Proxy Voting Policies link in the shaded box.

Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our website and through the SEC’s website. To access it through T. Rowe Price, visit the website location shown above, and scroll down to the section near the bottom of the page that says, “Proxy Voting Records.” Click on the Proxy Voting Records link in the shaded box.

How to Obtain Quarterly Portfolio Holdings

The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available electronically on the SEC’s website (sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F St. N.E., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.

About the Fund’s Directors and Officers

Your fund is overseen by a Board of Directors (Board) that meets regularly to review a wide variety of matters affecting or potentially affecting the fund, including performance, investment programs, compliance matters, advisory fees and expenses, service providers, and business and regulatory affairs. The Board elects the fund’s officers, who are listed in the final table. At least 75% of the Board’s members are independent of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price), and its affiliates; “inside” or “interested” directors are employees or officers of T. Rowe Price. The business address of each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the fund directors and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price representative at 1-800-638-5660.

Independent Directors
Name
(Year of Birth)
Year Elected*
[Number of T. Rowe Price	Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and
Portfolios Overseen]	Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years
William R. Brody, M.D., Ph.D.	President and Trustee, Salk Institute for Biological Studies (2009 to
(1944)	present); Director, BioMed Realty Trust (2013 to 2016); Chairman
2009	of the Board, Mesa Biotech, a molecular diagnostic company
[186]	(March 2016 to present); Director, Radiology Partners, an integrated
	radiology practice management company (June 2016 to present);
	Director, Novartis, Inc. (2009 to 2014); Director, IBM (2007
	to present)
Anthony W. Deering	Chairman, Exeter Capital, LLC, a private investment firm (2004 to
(1945)	present); Director, Brixmor Real Estate Investment Trust (2012 to
1991	present); Director and Advisory Board Member, Deutsche Bank
[186]	North America (2004 to present); Director, Under Armour (2008
	to present); Director, Vornado Real Estate Investment Trust (2004
	to 2012)
Bruce W. Duncan	Chief Executive Officer and Director (2009 to present), Chairman
(1951)	of the Board (January 2016 to present), and President (2009
2013	to September 2016), First Industrial Realty Trust, an owner and
[186]	operator of industrial properties; Chairman of the Board (2005 to
	May 2016) and Director (1999 to May 2016), Starwood Hotels &
	Resorts, a hotel and leisure company; Director, Boston Properties
	(May 2016 to present)
Robert J. Gerrard, Jr.	Advisory Board Member, Pipeline Crisis/Winning Strategies, a
(1952)	collaborative working to improve opportunities for young African
2012	Americans (1997 to present)
[186]
Paul F. McBride	Advisory Board Member, Vizzia Technologies (2015 to present)
(1956)
2013
[186]
Cecilia E. Rouse, Ph.D.	Dean, Woodrow Wilson School (2012 to present); Professor and
(1963)	Researcher, Princeton University (1992 to present); Director, MDRC,
2012	a nonprofit education and social policy research organization (2011
[186]	to present); Member of National Academy of Education (2010 to
	present); Research Associate of Labor Program (2011 to present)
	and Board Member (2015 to present), National Bureau of Economic
	Research (2011 to present); Chair of Committee on the Status of
	Minority Groups in the Economic Profession (2012 to present) and
	Vice President (2015 to present), American Economic Association
John G. Schreiber	Owner/President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate
(1946)	investment company (1991 to present); Cofounder, Partner, and
2001	Cochairman of the Investment Committee, Blackstone Real Estate
[186]	Advisors, L.P. (1992 to 2015); Director, General Growth Properties,
	Inc. (2010 to 2013); Director, Blackstone Mortgage Trust, a real
	estate financial company (2012 to 2016); Director and Chairman of
	the Board, Brixmor Property Group, Inc. (2013 to present); Director,
	Hilton Worldwide (2013 to present); Director, Hudson Pacific
	Properties (2014 to 2016)
Mark R. Tercek	President and Chief Executive Officer, The Nature Conservancy (2008
(1957)	to present)
2009
[186]
*Each independent director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor.

Inside Directors
Name
(Year of Birth)
Year Elected*
[Number of T. Rowe Price	Principal Occupation(s) and Directorships of Public Companies and
Portfolios Overseen]	Other Investment Companies During the Past Five Years
Edward C. Bernard	Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price; Vice Chairman of the
(1956)	Board, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.;
2006	Chairman of the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price
[186]	Investment Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board and Director,
	T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
	Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer,
	Director, and President, T. Rowe Price International and T. Rowe
	Price Trust Company; Chairman of the Board, all funds
Brian C. Rogers, CFA, CIC	Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price;
(1955)	Chairman of the Board, Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice
2006	President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice President, T. Rowe Price
[131]	Trust Company
*Each inside director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor.

Officers
Name (Year of Birth)
Position Held With International Funds	Principal Occupation(s)
Jason R. Adams (1979)	Vice President T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.; formerly, Research Analyst, Caxton
	Associates (to 2015)
Ulle Adamson, CFA (1979)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Roy H. Adkins (1970)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Christopher D. Alderson (1962)	Company’s Representative and Vice President,
President	Price Hong Kong; Vice President, Price
	Singapore; Director and Vice President, T. Rowe
	Price International; Vice President, T. Rowe
	Price Group, Inc.
Syed H. Ali (1970)	Vice President, Price Singapore and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Paulina Amieva (1981)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Malik S. Asif (1981)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International; formerly, student,
	The University of Chicago Booth School of
	Business (to 2012)
Harishankar Balkrishna (1983)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Sheena L. Barbosa (1983)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Peter J. Bates, CFA (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President	Group, Inc.
Luis M. Baylac (1982)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Oliver D.M. Bell, IMC (1969)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
R. Scott Berg, CFA (1972)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President	Group, Inc.
Steven E. Boothe, CFA (1977)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Peter I. Botoucharov (1965)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Director,
	EMEA Macroeconomic Research and Strategy
	(to 2012)
Tala Boulos (1984)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Vice
	President, CEEMEA Corporate Credit Research,
	Deutsche Bank (to 2013)
Darrell N. Braman (1963)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong, Price
Vice President and Secretary	Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group,
	Inc., T. Rowe Price International, T. Rowe Price
	Investment Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
	Services, Inc.
Ryan N. Burgess, CFA (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Sheldon Chan (1981)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Andrew Chang (1983)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Vice President
Tak Yiu Cheng, CFA, CPA (1974)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Carolyn Hoi Che Chu (1974)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Archibald Ciganer Albeniz, CFA (1976)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Richard N. Clattenburg, CFA (1979)	Vice President, Price Singapore, T. Rowe
Executive Vice President	Price, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and T. Rowe
	Price International
Michael J. Conelius, CFA (1964)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President	Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, and
	T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Michael F. Connelly, CFA (1977)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Andrew S. Davis (1978)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Richard de los Reyes (1975)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Michael Della Vedova (1969)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Shawn T. Driscoll (1975)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Bridget A. Ebner (1970)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
David J. Eiswert, CFA (1972)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International
Henry M. Ellenbogen (1973)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Ryan W. Ferro (1985)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price; formerly, student,
Vice President	Tucker School of Business at Dartmouth (to
	2014); Director, Corporate Development,
	ModusLink Global Solutions, Inc. (to 2012)
Mark S. Finn, CFA, CPA (1963)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Quentin S. Fitzsimmons (1968)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Portfolio
	Manager, Royal Bank of Scotland Group (to
	2015); Executive Director, Threadneedle
	Investment, Ltd. (to 2012)
Melissa C. Gallagher (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Justin T. Gerbereux, CFA (1975)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
John R. Gilner (1961)	Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President,
Chief Compliance Officer	T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price
	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment
	Services, Inc.
Vishnu Vardhan Gopal (1979)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Joel Grant (1978)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.; formerly, Analyst, Fidelity
	International (to 2014)
Paul D. Greene II (1978)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Benjamin Griffiths, CFA (1977)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Amanda B. Hall, CFA (1985)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price International;
Vice President	formerly, student, Stanford Graduate School
	of Business (to 2014); Investment Analyst, Bill
	Gates Investments (to 2012)
Richard L. Hall (1979)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.; formerly, Financial Attaché, U.S.
	Department of Treasury, International Affairs
	Division (to 2012)
Nabil Hanano, CFA (1984)	Employee, T. Rowe Price; formerly, Senior
Vice President	Equity Research Associate, Raymond James
	(to 2012)
Steven C. Huber, CFA, FSA (1958)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International
Stefan Hubrich, Ph.D., CFA (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Arif Husain, CFA (1972)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Executive Vice President	and T. Rowe Price International; formerly,
	Director/Head of UK and Euro Fixed Income,
	AllianceBernstein (to 2013)
Tetsuji Inoue (1971)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Vice President	and T. Rowe Price International; formerly,
	Equity Sales, JP Morgan Chase Securities Ltd.
	(to 2012)
Michael Jacobs (1971)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.,
Vice President	and T. Rowe Price International; formerly,
	Vice President, JP Morgan Asset Management
	(to 2013)
Randal S. Jenneke (1971)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Prashant G. Jeyaganesh (1983)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Nina P. Jones, CPA (1980)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Yoichiro Kai (1973)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Jai Kapadia (1982)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Andrew J. Keirle (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Paul J. Krug, CPA (1964)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Christopher J. Kushlis, CFA (1976)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Shengrong Lau (1982)	Vice President, Price Singapore and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.; formerly, student, The
	Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
	(to 2012)
Mark J. Lawrence (1970)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Jacqueline Liu (1979)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.; formerly, Investment Analyst,
	Fidelity International Hong Kong Limited
	(to 2014)
Anh Lu (1968)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Executive Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Oxana Lyalina (1987)	Employee, T. Rowe Price; formerly, Senior
Vice President	Analyst, Goldman Sachs International (to 2013)
Sebastien Mallet (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Ryan Martyn (1979)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Catherine D. Mathews (1963)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Treasurer and Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Jonathan H.W. Matthews, CFA (1975)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Raymond A. Mills, Ph.D., CFA (1960)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President	Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, and
	T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Jihong Min (1979)	Vice President, Price Singapore and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.; formerly, Financial Analyst,
	Geosphere Capital Management, Singapore
	(to 2012)
Eric C. Moffett (1974)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Executive Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Samy B. Muaddi, CFA (1984)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President	Group, Inc.
Tobias F. Mueller (1980)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Jared T. Murphy (1986)	Employee, T. Rowe Price; formerly, student,
Vice President	Stanford Graduate School of Business (to
	2015); Associate, ShawSpring Partners
	(to 2013)
Joshua Nelson (1977)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International
Philip A. Nestico (1976)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Michael Niedzielski (1979)	Vice President T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International; formerly, Manager
	and Analyst, Fidelity Investments, Boston and
	London Offices (to 2015)
Sridhar Nishtala (1975)	Vice President, Price Singapore and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Jason Nogueira, CFA (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President	Group, Inc.
David Oestreicher (1967)	Director, Vice President, and Secretary, T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price
	Retirement Plan Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price
	Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
	Chief Legal Officer, Vice President, and
	Secretary, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice
	President and Secretary, T. Rowe Price and
	T. Rowe Price International; Vice President,
	Price Hong Kong and Price Singapore
Michael D. Oh, CFA (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Kenneth A. Orchard (1975)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Curt J. Organt, CFA (1968)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Paul T. O’Sullivan (1973)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Oluwaseun A. Oyegunle, CFA (1984)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International; formerly, student,
	The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania
	(to 2013); Summer Investment Analyst, T. Rowe
	Price International (2012); Analyst, Asset &
	Resource Management Limited (to 2012)
Gonzalo Pángaro, CFA (1968)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Vivek Rajeswaran (1985)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.; formerly, student, Columbia
	Business School (to 2012)
John W. Ratzesberger (1975)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
	formerly, North American Head of Listed
	Derivatives Operation, Morgan Stanley
	(to 2013)
Shannon H. Rauser (1987)	Employee, T. Rowe Price
Assistant Secretary
Melanie A. Rizzo (1982)	Employee, T. Rowe Price
Vice President
David L. Rowlett, CFA (1975)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Mariel Santiago (1981)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price; formerly, Equity
Vice President	Research Analyst, HSBC Securities, Inc.
	(to 2014)
Federico Santilli, CFA (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Sebastian Schrott (1977)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Deborah D. Seidel (1962)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Services,
	Inc., and T. Rowe Price Services, Inc.
Jeneiv Shah, CFA (1980)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price International
Vice President
Robert W. Sharps, CFA, CPA (1971)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
John C.A. Sherman (1969)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Robert W. Smith (1961)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Gabriel Solomon (1977)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Eunbin Song, CFA (1980)	Vice President, Price Singapore and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Joshua K. Spencer, CFA (1973)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
David A. Stanley (1963)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Taymour R. Tamaddon, CFA (1976)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Ju Yen Tan (1972)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Sin Dee Tan, CFA (1979)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Dean Tenerelli (1964)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Siby Thomas (1979)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Justin Thomson (1968)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Mitchell J.K. Todd (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Mark J. Vaselkiv (1958)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Kes Visuvalingam, CFA (1968)	Director, Responsible Officer, and Vice
Vice President	President, Price Hong Kong; Director, Chief
	Executive Officer, and Vice President, Price
	Singapore; and Vice President, T. Rowe Price
	Group, Inc.
Verena E. Wachnitz, CFA (1978)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
David J. Wallack (1960)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Dai Wang (1989)	Employee, T. Rowe Price; formerly, student
Vice President	Harvard Business School (to 2014); Analyst,
	Goldman Sachs (to 2012)
Hiroshi Watanabe, CFA (1975)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Christopher S. Whitehouse (1972)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Clive M. Williams (1966)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong, Price
Vice President	Singapore, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Group,
	Inc., and T. Rowe Price International
J. Howard Woodward, CFA (1974)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Marta Yago (1977)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President	T. Rowe Price International
Benjamin T. Yeagle (1978)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President	Group, Inc.
Ernest C. Yeung, CFA (1979)	Director, Responsible Officer, and Vice
Executive Vice President	President, Price Hong Kong; Vice President,
	T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
Alison Mei Ling Yip (1966)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Wenli Zheng (1979)	Vice President, Price Hong Kong and T. Rowe
Vice President	Price Group, Inc.
Unless otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price
International for at least 5 years.

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees has determined that Mr. Bruce W. Duncan qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Duncan is considered independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered to, or on behalf of, the registrant by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:

Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit-related fees include amounts reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and specifically include the issuance of a report on internal controls and, if applicable, agreed-upon procedures related to fund acquisitions. Tax fees include amounts related to services for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. The nature of these services specifically includes the review of distribution calculations and the preparation of Federal, state, and excise tax returns. All other fees include the registrant’s pro-rata share of amounts for agreed-upon procedures in conjunction with service contract approvals by the registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees.

(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted a policy whereby audit and non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant require pre-approval in advance at regularly scheduled audit committee meetings. If such a service is required between regularly scheduled audit committee meetings, pre-approval may be authorized by one audit committee member with ratification at the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Waiver of pre-approval for audit or non-audit services requiring fees of a de minimis amount is not permitted.

(2) No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f) Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $1,890,000 and $2,366,000, respectively.

(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrant’s audit committee. Accordingly, these services were considered by the registrant’s audit committee in maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Investments.

(a) Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

(b) Not applicable.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.

(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.

(2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.

(3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.

(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.

SIGNATURES

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc.
 

	By	/s/ Edward C. Bernard
		Edward C. Bernard
		Principal Executive Officer
Date     December 15, 2016

 

     Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 

	By	/s/ Edward C. Bernard
		Edward C. Bernard
		Principal Executive Officer
Date     December 15, 2016
	By	/s/ Catherine D. Mathews
		Catherine D. Mathews
		Principal Financial Officer
Date     December 15, 2016