N-CSR

Item 1: Report to Shareholders

 Emerging Markets Bond Fund December 31, 2006 

The views and opinions in this report were current as of December 31, 2006. They are not guarantees of performance or investment results and should not be taken as investment advice. Investment decisions reflect a variety of factors, and the managers reserve the right to change their views about individual stocks, sectors, and the markets at any time. As a result, the views expressed should not be relied upon as a forecast of the fund’s future investment intent. The report is certified under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires mutual funds and other public companies to affirm that, to the best of their knowledge, the information in their financial reports is fairly and accurately stated in all material respects.

REPORTS ON THE WEB

Sign up for our E-mail Program, and you can begin to receive updated fund reports and prospectuses online rather than through the mail. Log in to your account at troweprice.com for more information.

Fellow Shareholders

Global concerns about rising interest rates and inflationary pressures resulted in modest returns for international bond markets during the second half of 2006. Steady economic growth in Europe prompted the European Central Bank (ECB) to raise interest rates during the summer and fall, pushing yields higher and bond prices lower across all maturities. Fears that the Japanese economy was running out of steam resulted in the Bank of Japan leaving rates untouched after raising them modestly in mid-summer. Following a round of profit taking in May and June, emerging markets debt rebounded and posted another year of stellar performance based on continuing strong fundamentals—political stability, steady economic growth, and improving inflation trends. Burdened with large trade and budget deficits, the dollar fell against the euro in the second half of 2006 but was able to eke out a slight gain against the Japanese yen.

For the periods ended December 31, 2006, the International Bond Fund posted a six-month return of 3.83% and a 12-month return of 7.55%. For the most recent six-month period, the fund’s performance was in line with the Lehman Brothers Global Aggregate Ex-U.S. Dollar Bond Index. For the one-year period, the fund outperformed, primarily due to our overweight in Mexican bonds denominated in pesos. (Returns for the fund’s Advisor Class shares, which have a different fee structure, were lower.)

HIGHLIGHTS

• Despite rising interest rates and concerns about global inflationary pressures, international bond markets posted solid returns for the year.

• For the six-month period, returns for the International Bond and Emerging Markets Bond funds were in line with their Lipper peer groups and beat them for the one-year period.

• Yield spreads between U.S. Treasuries and comparable foreign bonds ended the year at historically narrow levels, and both funds are positioned defensively to take advantage of the eventual widening of these spreads.

• We think that central banks are still concerned about inflation, and a number of them are likely to raise rates in the first half of 2007, creating an environment where global yields are likely to rise modestly.

The Emerging Markets Bond Fund outperformed its benchmark, the J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global, for the past six months and year ended December 31, 2006. For the six-month period, the fund returned 11.67%, compared with 10.64% for the benchmark, and for the 12-month period, the fund posted a gain of 11.43%, compared with the benchmark’s 9.88% return. Our decision to avoid a number of the underperforming issues in the benchmark helped our relative performance.

MARKET ENVIRONMENT

Uneven rates of global economic growth, Federal Reserve policy on hold, and growing inflation fears generated mixed returns in global bond markets in the past six months. Among the world’s major economies, growth patterns started to show signs of divergence. The strong U.S. economy that had been growing at an above-average rate began to decelerate. Europe’s economy, particularly Germany, showed unexpected strength, and Japan, which in early 2006 was finally showing signs of sustained growth, seemed to lose momentum toward the end of the year.

In response to slowing U.S. growth, the Federal Reserve left its short-term target rate at 5.25% during the second half of the year, ending a two-year tightening cycle. Despite a slumping housing market and clear signs of slowing economic growth, U.S. inflation remained at the high end of the Fed’s stated comfort zone. Even though the Fed’s official statements expressed concern about inflation, rates remained relatively steady, and volatility was confined to a rather tight range. At the end of 2006, the Treasury yield curve was inverted, meaning that short-term rates were higher than long-term rates.

In Europe, the ECB raised interest rates to 3.50% to keep inflation in check. The region reported growing economic momentum, particularly in Germany, where the Ifo survey of business confidence reached its highest level in 15 years. Europe’s short-term government bonds underperformed similar U.S. issues. Bond yields rose across short- and intermediate-term maturities in response to anticipated ECB rate increases and the continent’s growing economic momentum. Pension fund demand for long-term securities helped to depress yields on the longest maturities.

The Bank of Japan ended its five-year zero interest rate policy early in the year and imposed a 0.25% rate hike in the summer. It left the rates unchanged after it appeared that the nation’s economy was weakening. The Bank of Japan’s decision to leave rates unchanged in December helped shortermaturities, and strong demand from life insurers and pension funds—along with the Ministry of Finance’s announcement it would reduce the supply of bonds in 2007—supported the long end of the market.

Toward the end of the year, economic data indicated that the Japanese economy may not have been as weak as it had appeared earlier in the year. Rising employment, higher wages, and stronger domestic demand surpassed the market’s expectations. In addition, strong demand from China and the U.S. bolstered the country’s export sector. The market began to anticipate a rate increase in January. After a strong bond market for the past several years, the Japanese government bond market showed mixed results. Shorter- and longer-dated bonds appreciated modestly.

Although most of the world’s fixed-income markets posted modest results in local currencies, the weaker dollar, particularly against the euro, helped returns for U.S. investors. Despite months of higher short-term interest rates, record-setting U.S. trade and budget deficits weighed on the dollar.

Emerging markets bonds, which had suffered through a slump in May and June when investors sought to avoid risk, rebounded smartly in the second half of the year. For the fifth consecutive year, emerging markets were the best-performing sector in the fixed-income asset class. Evidence of solid economic growth, moderate inflation, and steady accumulation of reserves easily offset investor fears about emerging market volatility and risk. The best evidence of this change in sentiment occurred in December when Thailand imposed controls on foreign capital. Instead of causing a ripple effect that hurt all emerging markets, as happened when the Thai baht collapsed in 1997, the damage was confined to Thailand, which rescinded the policy the next day.

Technical conditions—countries buying back their debt and not issuing new obligations—also provided solid support for emerging markets debt. As a result of favorable fundamental and technical conditions, the difference in interest rates paid on emerging market credits and U.S. Treasuries tightened to a very narrow and historically low gap at year-end.

Investors, who had lost their enthusiasm for risk in May and June, regained it in the second half, and a number of markets, particularly those with solid fundamental underpinnings, rebounded strongly. Argentina, which had defaulted on its debt in 2001, enjoyed the best performance last year. Its strong economic growth, moderating inflation, and growing fiscal and trade balances allowed the country to repurchase debt and reduce its overall debt. In addition, the warrants it had issued to bondholders, which were tied to economic performance, skyrocketed in value.

Brazil also had a good year, benefiting from central bank rate cuts, government repurchase of debt, and credit upgrades. In addition, bond investors were glad to see President Ignacio Lula da Silva reelected. Russia was another example of an improving credit story. The steady flow of oil revenue, stabilized inflation, and early repayment of its outstanding debt convinced credit agencies to upgrade its bonds.

Mexican local debt also performed well. The country’s inflation rate was lower than expected, and the central bank cut rates. The election of conservative candidate Felipe Calderon increased the likelihood of the passage of structural and economic reforms that could result in improved credit ratings.

INTERNATIONAL BOND FUND

Higher bond yields in a number of markets impeded performance in 2006. (Bond prices and yields move in opposite directions.) An overweight position relative to the benchmark in the local bond markets of Mexico made the strongest contributions to the fund’s relative performance. A weak dollar helped boost the portfolio’s absolute returns.

We also benefited from holding an overweight position in Israeli bonds, which rose in response to the Bank of Israel’s interest rate cuts, moderating inflation trends, and strengthening government finances. An overweight in Polish bonds and an underweight in British government bonds also aided our relative performance compared with the European government market index. Given Japan’s unsettled condition, our reduced exposure to Japanese bonds also proved to be beneficial. We also got a boost from our overweight position in New Zealand and Canada. New Zealand’s slowing economy and the apparent peaking of its central bank’s tightening cycle pushed government bond prices higher and yields lower.

Our yield curve positioning in U.K. government bonds hurt our relative performance. We avoided longer maturities because we thought they were historically expensive, and we expected the yield curve to steepen.

Gains in emerging markets offset losses. Our strong performing Brazilian position balanced out the losses in lira-denominated Turkish bonds. Turkish markets experienced a slump earlier this year when the country’s central bank imposed emergency rate hikes to stifle inflation that was ratcheting higher.

In terms of currencies, the Russian ruble was our strongest contributor to relative performance. Holding the Malayasian ringgit, Brazilian real, and the euro also assisted our relative performance. Our larger-than-benchmark exposure to the weakening Japanese yen was the largest currency detractor. We currently hold larger weightings in the euro, Mexican peso, and Argentine peso than the index. We expect the dollar to weaken further against these currencies, which will be helpful to U.S. investors.

The fund’s duration is shorter than the benchmark’s. (A shorter duration means that the fund is less sensitive to interest rate changes.) The fund’s duration stood at 5.0 years—a bit longer than it was six months ago—compared with the benchmark maturity of 5.8 years. Earlier in the year, we had been shorter, but we added longer-dated Japanese government bonds, which lengthened the portfolio’s duration. As the Bank of Japan adjusts monetary policy and Japanese life insurers maintain a strong demand for long-term bonds, we expect the longer maturities to outperform short-term issues. In Europe, we positioned the fund defensively in expectation of another ECB rate hike.

Within the emerging markets, we are maintaining the fund’s positions in the local-currency bond markets of Brazil and Turkey, as we believe their longer-term economic and financial outlooks are promising.

The fund’s credit quality remained high. Almost 80% of our bond holdings were rated AA or higher. We also have a healthy balance in cash or cash equivalents to take advantage of any increase in short-term rates.

EMERGING MARKETS BOND FUND

Defying the odds and a midyear stumble, emerging market bonds posted another strong year of performance. A global financial system awash in liquidity, steady and noninflationary economic growth, improved fiscal and trade balances, and investors seeking higher yields helped emerging market debt yields tighten relative to U.S. Treasuries. At the end of the year, the difference between the yield on emerging markets bonds and a comparable 10-year U.S. Treasury bond had narrowed to 170 basis points (100 basis points equal one percentage point), compared with a spread of more than 550 basis points five years ago when the current emerging markets bond rally started.

We benefited from liquidating some of our winners and taking a number of contrarian positions, such as avoiding Ecuador and Venezuela. Our overweight position in Argentina was the strongest contributor to the fund’s performance. After the 2001 default, we purchased bonds that had warrants that would reward the bondholders if Argentina’s economic growth exceeded government projections. The government cleaned up the economy, and these warrants, which much of the market had earlier dismissed as being valueless, are now in high demand. We trimmed our position in Argentina and exchanged into some lower-risk issues, but we continue to be overweight relative to the index. The country’s economy continues to expand, inflation has been decelerating, and its bonds were recently upgraded.

Another significant contributor was Serbia, which saw a strong demand for its bonds. In Brazil, we benefited from holding bonds denominated in Brazilian reals. With solid economic growth, lower inflation, and central bank interest rate cuts, yields dropped, and these issues appreciated nicely. The story in Mexico is similar, and we expect the Calderon administration to enact labor and financial reforms that could result in upgrades. Ecuador is not so encouraging. President Rafael Correa and his economic team called for a restructuring of the country’s debt and a timely suspension of debt service. His rhetoric unsettled the markets; we held minimal positions in Ecuador. We did not like the rhetoric and recent actions of Venezuela’s leader Hugo Chavez and don’t hold any Venezuelan bonds. In this case, the fund suffered because Venezuela, which proposed a bond buyback program, was one of the stronger performers for the past six months. In Russia, we took profits in government-issued bonds and in Gazprom, Russia’s lucrative state-owned natural gas company.

In the second half of the year, we continued to purchase more bonds denominated in local currencies. We anticipate that local-currency bonds will become more prevalent in emerging markets as governments borrow less in foreign currencies. This trend should deepen emerging economies’ domestic currency markets.

We continue to look for good candidates for the portfolio and identify opportunities before the rest of the market does. For instance, we have been investing in Vietnam, which is a very good diversifier and has served as an inexpensive proxy for buying more expensive bonds from China. We also have invested in Iraqi and Lebanese bonds. Holding bonds of these seemingly troubled nations makes sense when you consider their financial strength. Iraq is a country of untapped economic potential and wealth. Two days of Iraq’s oil production could cover the annual debt service of its outstanding bonds. Lebanon, which suffered tremendous physical destruction from Israel’s attack on Hezbollah in the spring, has been in far worse shape than it is today. Its highly developed banking system continues to attract capital, and major Arab oil producers such as Saudi Arabia are pumping petrodollars into the economy.

Our strategy remains focused on fundamental credit analysis and establishing high-conviction positions where warranted. We remain less focused on near-term trading events and prefer to build a diverse portfolio of longer-term positions. This approach is more appropriate to our fundamental investment style and enables us to hold down turnover and trading costs.

OUTLOOK

In an environment of flattening or inverted yield curves, we think global bond yields will rise modestly in the first half of 2007. We expect the Federal Reserve to hold interest rates steady as long as incoming economic data indicate that the U.S. economy is experiencing noninflationary growth. The ECB is likely to continue raising rates in response to near-term inflationary pressures, which should lead to the European bond market’s near-term underperformance. Japan’s economy should continue to expand, and we believe the market does not yet recognize the possibility of additional Bank of Japan rate hikes. We think longer-dated Japanese government bonds should outperform shorter maturities due to the strong demand for these bonds from life insurers and pension funds and the reduced fiscal supply for 2007.

Higher yields in Europe and Japan along with the Fed ending its tightening cycle are likely to contribute to dollar weakness, which should benefit investors in nondollar-denominated assets.

Investors are likely to recover some of their appetite for risk, and we expect the tightening in yield spreads between emerging and developed markets to continue. Those countries whose economies don’t depend heavily on a high rate of U.S. economic growth should fare well. A fall in commodity prices could also hurt those countries that are heavily dependent on selling oil, metals, and other raw materials. Concerns about the U.S., and now Chinese, markets could produce choppier markets than in the past few years. Over the longer term, the conditions look favorable in emerging debt markets. Debt buybacks are likely to continue, and large trade surpluses have better positioned many emerging countries to withstand the natural volatility in their markets. In addition, many of these countries are in better financial and fiscal shape than they have been in decades. As a result, these securities are safer than they used to be and are not likely to generate the higher returns they once did. Nev ertheless, we still believe that emerging markets will remain a fertile ground for investors.

Respectfully submitted,

Ian Kelson
President of the International Fixed Income Division and chairman of the International Bond Fund’s Investment Advisory Committee

Michael Conelius
Chairman of the Investment Advisory Committee for the Emerging Markets Bond Fund

January 22, 2007

The committee chairmen have day-to-day responsibility for the portfolios and work with committee members in developing and executing the funds’ investment programs.

RISK OF INTERNATIONAL BOND INVESTING

Funds that invest overseas generally carry more risk than funds that invest strictly in U.S. assets, including unpredictable changes in currency values. Investments in emerging markets are subject to abrupt and severe price declines, and should be regarded as speculative. The economic and political structures of developing nations, in most cases, do not compare favorably with the U.S. or other developed countries in terms of wealth and stability, and their financial markets often lack liquidity. Some countries also have legacies of hyperinflation, currency devaluations, and governmental interference in markets.

International investments are subject to currency risk, a decline in the value of a foreign currency versus the U.S. dollar, which reduces the dollar value of securities denominated in that currency. The overall impact on a fund’s holdings can be significant and long-lasting depending on the currencies represented in the portfolio, how each one appreciates or depreciates in relation to the U.S. dollar, and whether currency positions are hedged. Further, exchange rate movements are unpredictable and it is not possible to effectively hedge the currency risks of many developing countries.

Bonds are also subject to interest rate risk, the decline in bond prices that usually accompanies a rise in interest rates, and credit risk, the chance that any fund holding could have its credit rating downgraded, or that a bond issuer will default (fail to make timely payments of interest or principal), potentially reducing the fund’s income level and share price.

GLOSSARY

Average maturity: For a bond fund, this is the weighted average of the stated maturity dates of the portfolio’s securities. In general, the longer the average maturity, the greater the fund’s sensitivity to interest rate changes, which can mean greater price fluctuation. A shorter average maturity usually means less interest rate sensitivity and, consequently, a less volatile portfolio.

Basis Point: One one-hundredth of one percentage point, or 0.01%.

Duration: A measure of a bond or bond fund’s sensitivity to changes in interest rates. For example, a fund with a duration of six years would fall about 6% in response to a one-percentage point rise in rates, and vice versa.

Hedged: The buying and selling of forward exchange contracts to lock a currency’s value. In an unhedged position, no steps are taken to protect against currency fluctuations.

J.P. Morgan Emerging Markets Bond Index Global: Tracks U.S. dollar government bonds of 31 foreign countries.

J.P. Morgan Global Government Bond Broad Index, Non-U.S. Dollar: Tracks government bonds in 12 international markets.

Lehman Brothers Global Aggregate Ex-U.S. Dollar Bond Index: Tracks an international basket of bonds that contains 65% government, 14% corporate, 13% agency, and 8% mortgage-related bonds.

Yield curve: A graphic depiction of the relationship between yields and maturity dates for a set of similar securities, such as Treasuries or municipal securities. Securities with longer maturities usually have a higher yield. If short-term securities offer a higher yield, then the curve is said to be “inverted.” If short- and long-term bonds are offering equivalent yields, then the curve is said to be “flat.”

PERFORMANCE AND EXPENSES
T. ROWE PRICE FOREIGN BOND FUNDS

GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.

AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns had been earned at a constant rate.

GROWTH OF $10,000 

This chart shows the value of a hypothetical $10,000 investment in the fund over the past 10 fiscal year periods or since inception (for funds lacking 10-year records). The result is compared with benchmarks, which may include a broad-based market index and a peer group average or index. Market indexes do not include expenses, which are deducted from fund returns as well as mutual fund averages and indexes.

AVERAGE ANNUAL COMPOUND TOTAL RETURN 

This table shows how the fund would have performed each year if its actual (or cumulative) returns had been earned at a constant rate.

FUND EXPENSE EXAMPLE 

As a mutual fund shareholder, you may incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads, and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees, distribution and service (12b-1) fees, and other fund expenses. The following example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds. The example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the most recent six-month period and held for the entire period.

Please note that the International Bond Fund has two share classes: The original share class (“investor class”) charges no distribution and service (12b-1) fee. Advisor Class shares are offered only through unaffiliated brokers and other financial intermediaries and charge a 0.25% 12b-1 fee. Each share class is presented separately in the table.

Actual Expenses
The first line of the following table (“Actual”) provides information about actual account values and expenses based on the fund’s actual returns. You may use the information in this line, together with your account balance, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line under the heading “Expenses Paid During Period” to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes
The information on the second line of the table (“Hypothetical”) is based on hypothetical account values and expenses derived from the fund’s actual expense ratio and an assumed 5% per year rate of return before expenses (not the fund’s actual return). You may compare the ongoing costs of investing in the fund with other funds by contrasting this 5% hypothetical example and the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period.

Note: T. Rowe Price charges an annual small-account maintenance fee of $10, generally for accounts with less than $2,000 ($500 for UGMA/UTMA). The fee is waived for any investor whose T. Rowe Price mutual fund accounts total $25,000 or more, accounts employing automatic investing, and IRAs and other retirement plan accounts that utilize a prototype plan sponsored by T. Rowe Price (although a separate custodial or administrative fee may apply to such accounts). This fee is not included in the accompanying table. If you are subject to the fee, keep it in mind when you are estimating the ongoing expenses of investing in the fund and when comparing the expenses of this fund with other funds.

You should also be aware that the expenses shown in the table highlight only your ongoing costs and do not reflect any transaction costs, such as redemption fees or sales loads. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. To the extent a fund charges transaction costs, however, the total cost of owning that fund is higher.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 

NOTE 1 - SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc. (the corporation), is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). The Emerging Markets Bond Fund (the fund), a nondiversified, open-end management investment company, is one portfolio established by the corporation. The fund commenced operations on December 30, 1994. The fund seeks to provide high income and capital appreciation.

The accompanying financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which require the use of estimates made by fund management. Fund management believes that estimates and security valuations are appropriate; however, actual results may differ from those estimates, and the security valuations reflected in the financial statements may differ from the value the fund ultimately realizes upon sale of the securities.

Valuation The fund values its investments and computes its net asset value per share at the close of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4 p.m. ET, each day that the NYSE is open for business. Debt securities are generally traded in the over-the-counter market. Securities with original maturities of one year or more are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities or by an independent pricing service, which considers yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity, and type, as well as prices quoted by dealers who make markets in such securities. Securities with original maturities of less than one year are valued at amortized cost in local currency, which approximates fair value when combined with accrued interest.

Equity securities listed or regularly traded on a securities exchange or in the over-the-counter (OTC) market are valued at the last quoted sale price or, for certain markets, the official closing price at the time the valuations are made, except for OTC Bulletin Board securities, which are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices. A security that is listed or traded on more than one exchange is valued at the quotation on the exchange determined to be the primary market for such security. Listed securities not traded on a particular day are valued at the mean of the latest bid and asked prices for domestic securities and the last quoted sale price for international securities.

Investments in mutual funds are valued at the mutual fund’s closing net asset value per share on the day of valuation. Financial futures contracts are valued at closing settlement prices. Forward currency exchange contracts are valued using the prevailing forward exchange rate. Swap agreements are valued at prices furnished by dealers who make markets in such securities.

Other investments, including restricted securities, and those for which the above valuation procedures are inappropriate or are deemed not to reflect fair value are stated at fair value as determined in good faith by the T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee, established by the fund’s Board of Directors.

Most foreign markets close before the close of trading on the NYSE. If the fund determines that developments between the close of a foreign market and the close of the NYSE will, in its judgment, materially affect the value of some or all of its portfolio securities, which in turn will affect the fund’s share price, the fund will adjust the previous closing prices to reflect the fair value of the securities as of the close of the NYSE, as determined in good faith by the T. Rowe Price Valuation Committee, established by the fund’s Board of Directors. A fund may also fair value securities in other situations, such as when a particular foreign market is closed but the fund is open. In deciding whether to make fair value adjustments, the fund reviews a variety of factors, including developments in foreign markets, the performance of U.S. securities markets, and the performance of instruments trading in U.S. markets that represent foreign securities and baskets of foreign securities. The fund uses outside pricing services to provide it with closing market prices and information used for adjusting those prices. The fund cannot predict when and how often it will use closing prices and when it will adjust those prices to reflect fair value. As a means of evaluating its fair value process, the fund routinely compares closing market prices, the next day’s opening prices in the same markets, and adjusted prices.

Currency Translation Assets, including investments, and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollar values each day at the prevailing exchange rate, using the mean of the bid and asked prices of such currencies against U.S. dollars as quoted by a major bank. Purchases and sales of securities, income, and expenses are translated into U.S. dollars at the prevailing exchange rate on the date of the transaction. The effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on realized and unrealized security gains and losses is reflected as a component of security gains and losses.

Credits The fund earns credits on temporarily uninvested cash balances at the custodian that reduce the fund’s custody charges. Custody expense in the accompanying financial statements is presented before reduction for credits.

Redemption Fees A 2% fee is assessed on redemptions of fund shares held less than 90 days to deter short-term trading and to protect the interests of long-term shareholders. Redemption fees are withheld from proceeds that shareholders receive from the sale or exchange of fund shares. The fees are paid to the fund, and are recorded as an increase to paid-in capital. The fees may cause the redemption price per share to differ from the net asset value per share.

Investment Transactions, Investment Income, and Distributions Income and expenses are recorded on the accrual basis. Premiums and discounts on debt securities are amortized for financial reporting purposes. Dividends received from mutual fund investments are reflected as dividend income; capital gain distributions are reflected as realized gain/loss. Dividend income and capital gain distributions are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Investment transactions are accounted for on the trade date. Realized gains and losses are reported on the identified cost basis. Payments (“variation margin”) made or received to settle the daily fluctuations in the value of futures contracts are recorded as unrealized gains or losses until the contracts are closed. Unrealized gains and losses on forward currency exchange contracts are reflected as the change in net unrealized gain or loss in the accompanying financial statements. Net periodic receipts or payments required by swaps are accrued daily and recorded as realized gain or loss in the accompanying financial statements. Fluctuations in the fair value of swaps are reflected in change in net unrealized gain or loss and are reclassified to realized gain or loss upon termination prior to maturity. Distributions to shareholders are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income distributions are declared on a daily basis and paid monthly. Capital gain distributions, if any, are declared and paid by the fund, typically on an annual basis.

New Accounting Pronouncements In June 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes, a clarification of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes. FIN 48 establishes financial reporting rules regarding recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return. Management is evaluating the anticipated impact, if any, that FIN 48 will have on the fund upon adoption, which, pursuant to a delay granted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, is expected to be on the last business day of the fund’s semi-annual period, June 29, 2007.

In September 2006, the FASB released the Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157 (“FAS 157”), Fair Value Measurements. FAS 157 clarifies the definition of fair value and establishes the framework for measuring fair value, as well as proper disclosure of this methodology in the financial statements. It will be effective for the fund’s fiscal year beginning January 1, 2008. Management is evaluating the effects of FAS 157; however, it is not expected to have a material impact on the fund’s net assets or results of operations.

NOTE 2 - INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS

Consistent with its investment objective, the fund engages in the following practices to manage exposure to certain risks or to enhance performance. The investment objective, policies, program, and risk factors of the fund are described more fully in the fund’s prospectus and Statement of Additional Information.

Emerging Markets At December 31, 2006, approximately 95% of the fund’s net assets were invested in securities of companies located in emerging markets or denominated in or linked to the currencies of emerging market countries. Future economic or political developments could adversely affect the liquidity or value, or both, of such securities.

Noninvestment-Grade Debt Securities At December 31, 2006, approximately 71% of the fund’s net assets were invested in noninvestment-grade debt securities, commonly referred to as “high-yield” or “junk” bonds. A real or perceived economic downturn or higher interest rates could adversely affect the liquidity or value, or both, of such securities because such events could lessen the ability of issuers to make principal and interest payments.

Restricted Securities The fund may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. Although certain of these securities may be readily sold, for example, under Rule 144A, others may be illiquid, their sale may involve substantial delays and additional costs, and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult.

Forward Currency Exchange Contracts During the year ended December 31, 2006, the fund was a party to forward currency exchange contracts under which it is obligated to exchange currencies at specified future dates and exchange rates. Risks arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their agreements and from movements in currency values.

Futures Contracts During the year ended December 31, 2006, the fund was a party to futures contracts, which provide for the future sale by one party and purchase by another of a specified amount of a specific financial instrument at an agreed upon price, date, time, and place. Risks arise from possible illiquidity of the futures market and from movements in security values and/or interest rates.

Swaps During the year ended December 31, 2006, the fund was a party to credit default swaps under which it buys or sells credit protection against a defined-issuer credit event. Upon a defined-issuer credit event, the fund is required to either deliver the notional amount of the contract in cash and take delivery of the relevant credit or deliver cash approximately equal to the notional amount of the contract less market value of the relevant credit at the time of the credit event. Risks arise from the possible inability of counterparties to meet the terms of their agreements and from changes in creditworthiness of the relevant underlying issuer.

Securities Lending The fund lends its securities to approved brokers to earn additional income. It receives as collateral cash and U.S. government securities valued at 102% to 105% of the value of the securities on loan. Cash collateral is invested in a money market pooled account managed by the fund’s lending agent in accordance with investment guidelines approved by fund management. Collateral is maintained over the life of the loan in an amount not less than the value of loaned securities, as determined at the close of fund business each day; any additional collateral required due to changes in security values is delivered to the fund the next business day. Although risk is mitigated by the collateral, the fund could experience a delay in recovering its securities and a possible loss of income or value if the borrower fails to return the securities. Securities lending revenue recognized by the fund consists of earnings on invested collateral and borrowing fees, net of any rebates to the borrower and compensation to the lending agent. At December 31, 2006, the value of loaned securities was $150,398,000; aggregate collateral consisted of $155,822,000 in the money market pooled account and U.S. government securities valued at $985,000.

Other Purchases and sales of portfolio securities, other than short-term securities, aggregated $419,082,000 and $305,748,000, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2006.

NOTE 3 - FEDERAL INCOME TAXES

No provision for federal income taxes is required since the fund intends to continue to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code and distribute to shareholders all of its taxable income and gains. Federal income tax regulations differ from generally accepted accounting principles; therefore, distributions determined in accordance with tax regulations may differ significantly in amount or character from net investment income and realized gains for financial reporting purposes. Financial reporting records are adjusted for permanent book/tax differences to reflect tax character. Financial records are not adjusted for temporary differences.

Distributions during the year ended December 31, 2006 were characterized as follows for tax purposes:

At December 31, 2006, the tax-basis components of net assets were as follows:

Federal income tax regulations require the fund to defer recognition of capital losses realized on certain futures and forward currency exchange contract transactions; accordingly, $1,125,000 of realized losses reflected in the accompanying financial statements have not been recognized for tax purposes as of December 31, 2006. At December 31, 2006, tax-basis undistributed ordinary income includes $673,000 of interest income on troubled debt issues that has not been recognized for financial reporting purposes.

For the year ended December 31, 2006, the fund recorded the following permanent reclassifications to reflect tax character. Reclassifications to paid-in capital relate primarily to a tax practice that treats a portion of the proceeds from each redemption of capital shares as a distribution of taxable net investment income and/or realized capital gain. Results of operations and net assets were not affected by these reclassifications.

At December 31, 2006, the cost of investments for federal income tax purposes was $733,105,000.

NOTE 4 - FOREIGN TAXES

The fund is subject to foreign income taxes imposed by certain countries in which it invests. Additionally, capital gains realized by the fund upon disposition of securities issued in or by certain foreign countries are subject to capital gains tax imposed by those countries, which is payable prior to repatriation of sale proceeds. Similarly, a tax on net profits, including interest income and realized and unrealized capital gains, is imposed by certain other countries. All taxes are computed in accordance with the applicable foreign tax law, and, to the extent permitted, capital losses are used to offset capital gains. Tax expense attributable to income is accrued by the fund as a reduction of income. Current and deferred tax expense attributable to net capital gains is reflected as a component of realized and/or change in unrealized gain/loss on securities in the accompanying financial statements.

At December 31, 2006, the fund had foreign taxes payable of $64,000 and no deferred tax liabilities or foreign capital loss carryforwards attributable to foreign securities.

NOTE 5 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The fund is managed by T. Rowe Price International, Inc. (the manager), a wholly owned subsidiary of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (Price Associates), which is wholly owned by T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. The investment management agreement between the fund and the manager provides for an annual investment management fee, which is computed daily and paid monthly. The fee consists of an individual fund fee, equal to 0.45% of the fund’s average daily net assets, and a group fee. The group fee rate is calculated based on the combined net assets of certain mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (the group) applied to a graduated fee schedule, with rates ranging from 0.48% for the first $1 billion of assets to 0.29% for assets in excess of $160 billion. The fund’s group fee is determined by applying the group fee rate to the fund’s average daily net assets. At December 31, 2006, the effective annual group fee rate was 0.31%.

In addition, the fund has entered into service agreements with Price Associates and two wholly owned subsidiaries of Price Associates (collectively, Price). Price Associates computes the daily share price and provides certain other administrative services to the fund. T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., provides shareholder and administrative services in its capacity as the fund’s transfer and dividend disbursing agent. T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc., provides subaccounting and recordkeeping services for certain retirement accounts invested in the fund. For the year ended December 31, 2006, expenses incurred pursuant to these service agreements were $130,000 for Price Associates, $372,000 for T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., and $26,000 for T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan Services, Inc. The total amount payable at period-end pursuant to these service agreements is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements.

The fund is also one of several mutual funds sponsored by Price Associates (underlying Price funds) in which the T. Rowe Price Spectrum Funds (Spectrum Funds) may invest. The Spectrum Funds do not invest in the underlying Price funds for the purpose of exercising management or control. Pursuant to a special servicing agreement, expenses associated with the operation of the Spectrum Funds are borne by each underlying Price fund to the extent of estimated savings to it and in proportion to the average daily value of its shares owned by the Spectrum Funds. Expenses allocated under this agreement are reflected as shareholder servicing expense in the accompanying financial statements. For the year ended December 31, 2006, the fund was allocated $179,000 of Spectrum Funds’ expenses, of which $137,000 related to services provided by Price. The amount payable at period-end pursuant to this agreement is reflected as Due to Affiliates in the accompanying financial statements. At December 31, 20 06, approximately 18% of the outstanding shares of the fund were held by the Spectrum Funds.

The fund may invest in the T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund and the T. Rowe Price Government Reserve Investment Fund (collectively, the T. Rowe Price Reserve Funds), open-end management investment companies managed by Price Associates and affiliates of the fund. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Funds are offered as cash management options to mutual funds, trusts, and other accounts managed by Price Associates and/or its affiliates, and are not available for direct purchase by members of the public. The T. Rowe Price Reserve Funds pay no investment management fees. During the year ended December 31, 2006, dividend income from the T. Rowe Price Reserve Funds totaled $884,000, and the value of shares of the T. Rowe Price Reserve Funds held at December 31, 2006, and December 31, 2005, was $28,634,000 and $17,712,000, respectively.

As of December 31, 2006, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. and/or its wholly owned subsidiaries owned 119,458 shares of the fund, representing less than 1% of the fund’s net assets.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM 

To the Board of Directors of T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc. and Shareholders of T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund

In our opinion, the accompanying statement of assets and liabilities, including the portfolio of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund (one of the portfolios comprising T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc., hereafter referred to as the “Fund”) at December 31, 2006, the results of its operations for the year then ended, the changes in its net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the Fund’s management; our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the auditing standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at December 31, 2006 by correspondence with the custodian, brokers and by agreement to the underlying ownership records for T. Rowe Price Reserve Investment Fund, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Baltimore, Maryland
February 12, 2007

TAX INFORMATION (UNAUDITED) FOR THE TAX YEAR ENDED 12/31/06 

We are providing this information as required by the Internal Revenue Code. The amounts shown may differ from those elsewhere in this report because of differences between tax and financial reporting requirements.

The fund’s distributions to shareholders included:

• $1,024,000 from short-term capital gains,

• $17,064,000 from long-term capital gains, which was subject to the 15% rate gains category.

INFORMATION ON PROXY VOTING POLICIES, PROCEDURES, AND RECORDS 

A description of the policies and procedures used by T. Rowe Price funds and portfolios to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities is available in each fund’s Statement of Additional Information, which you may request by calling 1-800-225-5132 or by accessing the SEC’s Web site, www.sec.gov. The description of our proxy voting policies and procedures is also available on our Web site, www.troweprice.com. To access it, click on the words “Company Info” at the top of our homepage for individual investors. Then, in the window that appears, click on the “Proxy Voting Policy” navigation button in the top left corner.

Each fund’s most recent annual proxy voting record is available on our Web site and through the SEC’s Web site. To access it through our Web site, follow the directions above, then click on the words “Proxy Voting Record” at the bottom of the Proxy Voting Policy page.

HOW TO OBTAIN QUARTERLY PORTFOLIO HOLDINGS 

The fund files a complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the Securities and Exchange Commission for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. The fund’s Form N-Q is available electronically on the SEC’s Web site (www.sec.gov); hard copies may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 450 Fifth St. N.W., Washington, DC 20549. For more information on the Public Reference Room, call 1-800-SEC-0330.

ABOUT THE FUND’S DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS 

Your fund is governed by a Board of Directors that meets regularly to review a wide variety of matters affecting the fund, including performance, investment programs, compliance matters, advisory fees and expenses, service providers, and other business affairs. The Board of Directors elects the fund’s officers, who are listed in the final table. At least 75% of Board members are independent of T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (T. Rowe Price), and T. Rowe Price International, Inc. (T. Rowe Price International); “inside” or “interested” directors are officers of T. Rowe Price. The business address of each director and officer is 100 East Pratt Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21202. The Statement of Additional Information includes additional information about the fund directors and is available without charge by calling a T. Rowe Price representative at 1-800-225-5132.

Independent Directors
Name
(Year of Birth)	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
Year Elected*	and Directorships of Other Public Companies
Jeremiah E. Casey	Director, Allfirst Financial Inc. (previously First Maryland Bankcorp)
(1940)	(1983 to 2002); Director, National Life Insurance (2001 to 2005);
2006	Director, The Rouse Company, real estate developers (1990 to 2004)
Anthony W. Deering	Chairman, Exeter Capital, LLC, a private investment firm (2004 to
(1945)	present); Director, Vornado Real Estate Investment Trust (3/04
1991	to present); Director, Mercantile Bankshares (4/03 to present);
	Member, Advisory Board, Deutsche Bank North America (2004
	to present); Director, Chairman of the Board, and Chief Executive
	Officer, The Rouse Company, real estate developers (1997 to 2004)
Donald W. Dick, Jr.	Principal, EuroCapital Advisors, LLC, an acquisition and management
(1943)	advisory firm; Chairman, President, and Chief Executive Officer,
1988	The Haven Group, a custom manufacturer of modular homes
	(1/04 to present)
David K. Fagin	Chairman and President, Nye Corporation (6/88 to present);
(1938)	Director, Canyon Resources Corp., Golden Star Resources Ltd.
2001	(5/92 to present), and Pacific Rim Mining Corp. (2/02 to present)
Karen N. Horn	Director, Federal National Mortgage Association (9/06 to present);
(1943)	Managing Director and President, Global Private Client Services,
2003	Marsh Inc. (1999 to 2003); Director, Georgia Pacific (5/04 to 12/05),
	Eli Lilly and Company, and Simon Property Group

Theo C. Rodgers	President, A&R Development Corporation
(1941)
2006
John G. Schreiber	Owner/President, Centaur Capital Partners, Inc., a real estate
(1946)	investment company; Partner, Blackstone Real Estate Advisors, L.P.
2001
* Each independent director oversees 115 T. Rowe Price portfolios and serves until retirement, resignation,
or election of a successor.

Inside Directors
Name
(Year of Birth)
Year Elected*
[Number of T. Rowe Price	Principal Occupation(s) During Past 5 Years
Portfolios Overseen]	and Directorships of Other Public Companies
Edward C. Bernard	Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price Group,
(1956)	Inc.; Chairman of the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price
2006	Investment Services, Inc.; Chairman of the Board and Director,
[115]	T. Rowe Price International, Inc., T. Rowe Price Retirement Plan
	Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Savings
	Bank; Director, T. Rowe Price Global Asset Management Limited and
	T. Rowe Price Global Investment Services Limited; Chief Executive
	Officer, Chairman of the Board, Director, and President, T. Rowe Price
	Trust Company; Chairman of the Board, all funds
Brian C. Rogers, CFA, CIC	Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice President, T. Rowe Price
(1955)	and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Vice President, T. Rowe Price Trust
2006	Company
[62]
* Each inside director serves until retirement, resignation, or election of a successor.

Officers
Name (Year of Birth)
Title and Fund(s) Served	Principal Occupation(s)
Christopher D. Alderson (1962)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
M. Kamran Baig (1962)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.; formerly Head
	of European Research and Senior Portfolio
	Manager/Research Analyst, Goldman Sachs
	Asset Management (to 2004)
P. Robert Bartolo, CPA (1972)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.
R. Scott Berg (1972)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.; formerly student, Stanford
	Graduate School of Business (to 2002)
Mark C.J. Bickford-Smith (1962)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Brian J. Brennan, CFA (1964)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Joseph A. Carrier, CPA (1960)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Treasurer, International Funds	Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment Services,
	Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Michael J. Conelius, CFA (1964)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Ann B. Cranmer, FCIS (1947)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Assistant Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.; Vice President
	and Secretary, T. Rowe Price Global Asset
	Management Limited and T. Rowe Price Global
	Investment Services Limited
Frances Dydasco (1966)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Executive Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Mark J.T. Edwards (1957)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.

Henry M. Ellenbogen (1971)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.
Roger L. Fiery III, CPA (1959)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, Inc.,
	and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Robert N. Gensler (1957)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International,
	Inc.
John R. Gilner (1961)	Chief Compliance Officer and Vice President,
Chief Compliance Officer, International Funds	T. Rowe Price; Vice President, T. Rowe Price
	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Investment
	Services, Inc.
Gregory S. Golczewski (1966)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Trust Company
M. Campbell Gunn (1956)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Global Investment
Vice President, International Funds	Services Limited, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Michael W. Holton (1968)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.
Henry H. Hopkins (1942)	Director and Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Investment Services, Inc., T. Rowe Price
	Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust
	Company; Vice President, T. Rowe Price,
	T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price
	International, Inc., and T. Rowe Price
	Retirement Plan Services, Inc.
Kris H. Jenner, M.D., D. Phil. (1962)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.
Ian D. Kelson (1956)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International, Inc.

John D. Linehan, CFA (1965)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.
Patricia B. Lippert (1953)	Assistant Vice President, T. Rowe Price and
Secretary, International Funds	T. Rowe Price Investment Services, Inc.
Anh Lu (1968)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Raymond A. Mills, Ph.D., CFA (1960)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Executive Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Philip A. Nestico (1976)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds
Charles M. Ober, CFA (1950)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.
David Oestreicher (1967)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Global Asset Management Limited, T. Rowe
	Price Global Investment Services Limited,
	T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price
	International, Inc., T. Rowe Price Investment
	Services, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Gonzalo Pángaro, CFA (1968)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Christopher J. Rothery (1963)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Robert W. Sharps, CFA, CPA (1971)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.
Robert W. Smith (1961)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Michael F. Sola, CFA (1969)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.
Dean Tenerelli (1964)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.

Justin Thomson (1968)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Julie L. Waples (1970)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds
David J.L. Warren (1957)	Director, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price Global
President, International Funds	Asset Management Limited, and T. Rowe Price
	Global Investment Services Limited; Vice
	President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.; Chief
	Executive Officer, Director, and President,
	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
William F. Wendler II, CFA (1962)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price and T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc.
Richard T. Whitney, CFA (1958)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc., T. Rowe Price International, Inc.,
	and T. Rowe Price Trust Company
Edward A. Wiese, CFA (1959)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price, T. Rowe Price
Vice President, International Funds	Group, Inc., and T. Rowe Price Trust Company;
	Chief Investment Officer, Director, and Vice
	President, T. Rowe Price Savings Bank
Clive M. Williams (1961)	Vice President, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., and
Vice President, International Funds	T. Rowe Price International, Inc.
Unless otherwise noted, officers have been employees of T. Rowe Price or T. Rowe Price International for at
least five years.

Item 2. Code of Ethics.

The registrant has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, applicable to its principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of this code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR. No substantive amendments were approved or waivers were granted to this code of ethics during the period covered by this report.

Item 3. Audit Committee Financial Expert.

The registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees has determined that Mr. Donald W. Dick Jr. qualifies as an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR. Mr. Dick is considered independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.

Item 4. Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

(a) – (d) Aggregate fees billed to the registrant for the last two fiscal years for professional services rendered by the registrant’s principal accountant were as follows:

Audit fees include amounts related to the audit of the registrant’s annual financial statements and services normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings. Audit-related fees include amounts reasonably related to the performance of the audit of the registrant’s financial statements and specifically include the issuance of a report on internal controls and, if applicable for 2006, agreed-upon procedures related to fund acquisitions. Tax fees include amounts related to services for tax compliance, tax planning, and tax advice. The nature of these services specifically includes the review of distribution calculations and the preparation of Federal, state, and excise tax returns. Reclassification from tax fees to audit fees of fiscal 2005 amounts related to the auditing of tax disclosures within the registrant’s annual financial statements has been made in order to conform to fiscal 2006 presentation. All other fees include the registrant’s pro-rata share of amounts for agreed-upon procedures in conjunction with service contract approvals by the registrant’s Board of Directors/Trustees.

(e)(1) The registrant’s audit committee has adopted a policy whereby audit and non-audit services performed by the registrant’s principal accountant for the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant require pre-approval in advance at regularly scheduled audit committee meetings. If such a service is required between regularly scheduled audit committee meetings, pre-approval may be authorized by one audit committee member with ratification at the next scheduled audit committee meeting. Waiver of pre-approval for audit or non-audit services requiring fees of a de minimis amount is not permitted.

    (2) No services included in (b) – (d) above were approved pursuant to paragraph (c)(7)(i)(C) of Rule 2-01 of Regulation S-X.

(f) Less than 50 percent of the hours expended on the principal accountant’s engagement to audit the registrant’s financial statements for the most recent fiscal year were attributed to work performed by persons other than the principal accountant’s full-time, permanent employees.

(g) The aggregate fees billed for the most recent fiscal year and the preceding fiscal year by the registrant’s principal accountant for non-audit services rendered to the registrant, its investment adviser, and any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with the investment adviser that provides ongoing services to the registrant were $1,401,000 and $883,000, respectively, and were less than the aggregate fees billed for those same periods by the registrant’s principal accountant for audit services rendered to the T. Rowe Price Funds. Preceding fiscal year amount reflects the reclassification of tax fees described in (a) – (d) above.

(h) All non-audit services rendered in (g) above were pre-approved by the registrant’s audit committee. Accordingly, these services were considered by the registrant’s audit committee in maintaining the principal accountant’s independence.

Item 5. Audit Committee of Listed Registrants.

Not applicable.

Item 6. Schedule of Investments.

Not applicable. The complete schedule of investments is included in Item 1 of this Form N-CSR.

Item 7. Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 8. Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies.

Not applicable.

Item 9. Purchases of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers.

Not applicable.

Item 10. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.

Not applicable.

Item 11. Controls and Procedures.

(a) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer have evaluated the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures within 90 days of this filing and have concluded that the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective, as of that date, in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the registrant in this Form N-CSR was recorded, processed, summarized, and reported timely.

(b) The registrant’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are aware of no change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s second fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Item 12. Exhibits.

(a)(1) The registrant’s code of ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is attached.

    (2) Separate certifications by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, are attached.

    (3) Written solicitation to repurchase securities issued by closed-end companies: not applicable.

(b) A certification by the registrant's principal executive officer and principal financial officer, pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and required by Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, is attached.

SIGNATURES
	Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment
Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
T. Rowe Price International Funds, Inc.
By	/s/ Edward C. Bernard
	Edward C. Bernard
	Principal Executive Officer
Date	February 16, 2007
	Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment
Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of
the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By	/s/ Edward C. Bernard
	Edward C. Bernard
	Principal Executive Officer
Date	February 16, 2007
By	/s/ Joseph A. Carrier
	Joseph A. Carrier
	Principal Financial Officer
Date	February 16, 2007

EX-99.CERT

Item 12(a)(2).

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Edward C. Bernard, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
	state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
	such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
	report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net
	assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of
	the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
	disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of
	1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment
	Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
	(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
		to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
		including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
		particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
		reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
		reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
		accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
		this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a
		date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
		occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially
		affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
		reporting; and
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit
	committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
		over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
		record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
	(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
		significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	February 16, 2007	/s/ Edward C. Bernard
		Edward C. Bernard
		Principal Executive Officer

CERTIFICATIONS 

I, Joseph A. Carrier, certify that:
1.	I have reviewed this report on Form N-CSR of T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to
	state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which
	such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this
	report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, changes in net
	assets, and cash flows (if the financial statements are required to include a statement of cash flows) of
	the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining
	disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act of
	1940) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment
	Company Act of 1940) for the registrant and have:
	(a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures
		to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant,
		including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities,
		particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	(b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial
		reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
		reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in
		accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	(c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in
		this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of a
		date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this report based on such evaluation; and
	(d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that
		occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially
		affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial
		reporting; and
5.	The registrant's other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed to the registrant's auditors and the audit
	committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	(a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control
		over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to
		record, process, summarize, and report financial information; and
	(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a
		significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	February 16, 2007	/s/ Joseph A. Carrier
		Joseph A. Carrier
		Principal Financial Officer

EX-99.906 CERT

Item 12(b).
CERTIFICATION UNDER SECTION 906 OF SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
Name of Issuer: T. Rowe Price Emerging Markets Bond Fund
In connection with the Report on Form N-CSR for the above named Issuer, the undersigned hereby
certifies, to the best of his knowledge, that:
1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities
	Exchange Act of 1934;
2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial
	condition and results of operations of the Issuer.
Date: February 16, 2007		/s/ Edward C. Bernard
		Edward C. Bernard
		Principal Executive Officer
Date: February 16, 2007		/s/ Joseph A. Carrier
		Joseph A. Carrier
		Principal Financial Officer

EX-99.CODE ETH

CODE OF ETHICS FOR PRINCIPAL EXECUTIVE AND SENIOR FINANCIAL     

OFFICERS OF THE PRICE FUNDS     

UNDER THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002     

I. General Statement. This Code of Ethics (the “Price Funds S-O Code”) has been designed 

to bring the Price Funds into compliance with the applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley 

Act of 2002 (the “Act”) rules promulgated by The Securities and Exchange Commission 

thereunder (“Regulations”). The Price Funds S-O Code applies solely to the Principal 

Executive Officer, Principal Financial Officer, Principal Accounting Officer or Controller of, or 

persons performing similar functions for, a Price Fund (whether such persons are employed by a 

Price Fund or third party) (“Covered Officers”). The “Price Funds” shall include each mutual 

fund that is managed, sponsored and distributed by affiliates of T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. 

(“Group”). The investment managers to the Price Funds will be referred to as the “Price Fund 

Advisers.” A list of Covered Officers is attached as Exhibit A. 

The Price Fund Advisers have, along with their parent, T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. (“Group”) 

also maintained a comprehensive Code of Ethics and Conduct (the “Group Code”) since 1972, 

which applies to all officers, directors and employees of the Price Funds, Group and its affiliates. 

As mandated by the Act, Group has adopted a Code (the “Group S-O Code”), similar to the 

Price Funds S-O Code, which applies solely to its principal executive and senior financial 

officers. The Group S-O Code and the Price Funds S-O Code will be referred to collectively as 

the “S-O Codes”. 

The Price Funds S-O Code has been adopted by the Price Funds in accordance with the Act and 

Regulations thereunder and will be administered in conformity with the disclosure requirements 

of Item 2 of Form N-CSR. The S-O Codes are attachments to the Group Code. In many respects 

the S-O Codes are supplementary to the Group Code, but the Group Code is administered 

separately from the S-O Codes, as the S-O Codes are from each other. 

II. Purpose of the Price Funds S-O Code. The purpose of the Price Funds S-O Code, as 

mandated by the Act and the Regulations, is to establish standards that are reasonably designed 

to deter wrongdoing and to promote: 

             Ethical Conduct. Honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of actual or 

             apparent conflicts of interest between personal and professional relationships. 

             Disclosure. Full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in reports and 

             documents that the Price Funds file with, or submit to, the SEC and in other public 

             communications made by the Price Funds. 

             Compliance. Compliance with applicable governmental laws, rules and regulations. 

             Reporting of Violations. The prompt internal reporting of violations of the Price Funds 

             S-O Code to an appropriate person or persons identified in the Price Funds S-O Code. 

             Accountability. Accountability for adherence to the Price Funds S-O Code. 

III. Covered Officers Should Handle Ethically Actual and Apparent Conflicts of Interest. 

Overview. Each Covered Officer owes a duty to the Price Funds to adhere to a high standard of 

honesty and business ethics and should be sensitive to situations that may give rise to actual as 

well as apparent conflicts of interest. 

A “conflict of interest” occurs when a Covered Officer’s private interest interferes with the 

interests of, or his or her service to, the Price Funds. For example, a conflict of interest would 

arise if a Covered Officer, or a member of his or her family, receives improper personal benefits 

as a result of his or her position with a Price Fund. 

Certain conflicts of interest covered by the Price Funds S-O Code arise out of the relationships 

between Covered Officers and the Price Funds and may already be subject to provisions 

regulating conflicts of interest in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (“Investment Company 

Act”), the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (“Investment Advisers Act”) and the Group Code. 

For example, Covered Officers may not individually engage in certain transactions (such as the 

purchase or sale of securities or other property) with a Price Fund because of their status as 

“affiliated persons” of a Price Fund. The compliance programs and procedures of the Price 

Funds and Price Fund Advisers are designed to prevent, or identify and correct, violations of 

these provisions. 

Although typically not presenting an opportunity for improper personal benefit, conflicts arise 

from, or as a result of, the contractual relationship between a Price Fund and its Price Fund 

Adviser (and its affiliates) of which the Covered Officers may also be officers or employees. As 

a result, the Price Funds S-O Code recognizes that the Covered Officers will, in the normal 

course of their duties (whether formally for the Price Funds or for the Price Fund Advisers, or for 

both), be involved in establishing policies and implementing decisions which will have different 

effects on these entities. The participation of the Covered Officers in such activities is inherent 

in the contractual relationship between each Price Fund and its respective Price Fund Adviser. 

Such participation is also consistent with the performance by the Covered Officers of their duties 

as officers of the Price Funds and, if consistent with the provisions of the Investment Company 

Act and the Investment Advisers Act, it will be deemed to have been handled ethically. 

Other conflicts of interest are covered by the Price Funds S-O Code, even if these conflicts of 

interest are not addressed by or subject to provisions in the Investment Company Act and the 

Investment Advisers Act. 

Whenever a Covered Officer is confronted with a conflict of interest situation where he or she is 

uncertain as to the appropriate action to be taken, he or she should discuss the matter with the 

Chairperson of Group’s Ethics Committee or another member of the Committee. 

Handling of Specific Types of Conflicts. Each Covered Officer (and close family members) 

must not: 

              Entertainment. Accept entertainment from any company with which any Price 

              Fund or any Price Fund Adviser has current or prospective business dealings, 

              including portfolio companies, unless such entertainment is in full compliance 

              with the policy on entertainment as set forth in the Group Code. 

              Gifts. Accept any gifts, except as permitted by the Group Code. 

               Improper Personal Influence. Use his or her personal influence or personal 

               relationships improperly to influence investment decisions, brokerage allocations 

               or financial reporting by the Price Funds to the detriment of any one or more of 

               the Price Funds. 

               Taking Action at the Expense of a Price Fund. Cause a Price Fund to take 

               action, or fail to take action, for the personal benefit of the Covered Officer rather 

               than for the benefit of one or more of the Price Funds. 

               Misuse of Price Funds’ Transaction Information. Use knowledge of portfolio 

               transactions made or contemplated for a Price Fund or any other clients of the 

               Price Fund Advisers to trade personally or cause others to trade in order to take 

               advantage of or avoid the market impact of such portfolio transactions. 

               Outside Business Activities. Engage in any outside business activity that 

               detracts from a Covered Officer’s ability to devote appropriate time and attention 

               to his or her responsibilities to a Price Fund. 

               Service Providers. Excluding Group and its affiliates, have any ownership 

               interest in, or any consulting or employment relationship with, any of the Price 

               Funds’ service providers, except that an ownership interest in public companies is 

               permitted 

               Receipt of Payments. Have a direct or indirect financial interest in commissions, 

               transaction charges, spreads or other payments paid by a Price Fund for effecting 

               portfolio transactions or for selling or redeeming shares other than an interest 

               (such as compensation or equity ownership) arising from the Covered Officer’s 

               employment by Group or any of its affiliates. 

               Service as a Director or Trustee. Serve as a director, trustee or officer of any 

               public or private company or a non-profit organization that issues securities 

               eligible for purchase by any of the Price Funds, unless approval is obtained as 

               required by the Group Code. 

IV. Covered Officers’ Specific Obligations and Accountabilities.   

               A. Disclosure Requirements and Controls. Each Covered Officer must 

               familiarize himself or herself with the disclosure requirements (Form N-1A registration 

               statement, proxy (Schedule 14A), shareholder reports, Forms N-SAR, N-CSR, etc.) 

               applicable to the Price Funds and the disclosure controls and procedures of the Price 

               Fund and the Price Fund Advisers. 

               B. Compliance with Applicable Law. It is the responsibility of each Covered 

               Officer to promote compliance with all laws, rules and regulations applicable to the Price 

               Funds and the Price Fund Advisers. Each Covered Officer should, to the extent 

               appropriate within his or her area of responsibility, consult with other officers and 

               employees of the Price Funds and the Price Fund Advisers and take other appropriate 

               steps with the goal of promoting full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure 

               in the reports and documents the Price Funds file with, or submit to, the SEC, and in 

               other public communications made by the Price Funds. 

               C. Fair Disclosure. Each Covered Officer must not knowingly misrepresent, or 

               cause others to misrepresent, facts about a Price Fund to others, whether within or 

               outside the Price organization, including to the Price Fund’s directors and auditors, and 

               to governmental regulators and self-regulatory organizations. 

               D. Initial and Annual Affirmations. Each Covered Officer must:

                     1. Upon adoption of the Price Funds S-O Code (or thereafter, as applicable, upon 

                     becoming a Covered Officer), affirm in writing that he or she has received, read, 

                     and understands the Price Funds S-O Code. 

                     2. Annually affirm that he or she has complied with the requirements of the Price 

                     Funds S-O Code. 

               E. Reporting of Material Violations of the Price Funds S-O Code. If a 

               Covered Officer becomes aware of any material violation of the Price Funds S-O Code 

               or laws and governmental rules and regulations applicable to the operations of the 

               Price Funds, he or she must promptly report the violation (“Report”) to the Chief 

               Legal Counsel of the Price Funds (“CLC”). Failure to report a material violation will 

               be considered itself a violation of the Price Funds S-O Code. The CLC is identified in 

               the attached Exhibit B. 

               It is the Price Funds policy that no retaliation or other adverse action will be taken 

               against any Covered Officer or other employee of a Price Fund, a Price Fund Adviser 

               or their affiliates based upon any lawful actions of the Covered Officer or employee 

               with respect to a Report made in good faith. 

               F. Annual Disclosures. Each Covered Officer must report, at least annually, all 

               affiliations or other relationships as called for in the “Annual Questionnaire for 

               Executive Officers and/or Employee Directors/Trustees of Group and the Price Funds.” 

V. Administration of the Price Funds S-O Code. The Ethics Committee is responsible for 

administering the Price Funds S-O Code and applying its provisions to specific situations in 

which questions are presented. 

               A. Waivers and Interpretations. The Chairperson of the Ethics Committee has 

               the authority to interpret the Price Funds S-O Code in any particular situation and to 

               grant waivers where justified, subject to the approval of the Joint Audit Committee of 

               the Price Funds. All material interpretations concerning Covered Officers will be 

               reported to the Joint Audit Committee of the Price Funds at its next meeting. Waivers, 

               including implicit waivers, to Covered Officers will be publicly disclosed as required 

               in the Instructions to N-CSR. Pursuant to the definition in the Regulations, an implicit 

               waiver means a Price Fund’s failure to take action within a reasonable period of time 

               regarding a material departure from a provision of the Price Funds S-O Code that has 

               been made known to an “executive officer” (as defined in Rule 3b-7 under the 

               Securities Exchange Act of 1934) of a Price Fund. An executive officer of a Price 

               Fund includes its president and any vice-president in charge of a principal business 

               unit, division or function. 

               B. Violations/Investigations. The following procedures will be followed in 

               investigating and enforcing the Price Funds S-O Code: 

                     1. The CLC will take or cause to be taken appropriate action to 

                     investigate any potential or actual violation reported to him or her. 

                     2. The CLC, after consultation if deemed appropriate with Outside 

                     Counsel to the Price Funds, will make a recommendation to the 

                     appropriate Price Funds Board regarding the action to be taken with 

                     regard to each material violation. Such action could include any of the 

                     following: a letter of censure or suspension, a fine, a suspension of trading 

                     privileges or termination of officership or employment. In addition, the 

                     violator may be required to surrender any profit realized (or loss avoided) 

                     from any activity that is in violation of the Price Funds S-O Code. 

VI. Amendments to the Price Funds S-O Code. Except as to the contents of Exhibit A and 

Exhibit B, the Price Funds S-O Code may not be materially amended except in written form, 

which is specifically approved or ratified by a majority vote of each Price Fund Board, including 

a majority of the independent directors on each Board. 

VII. Confidentiality. All reports and records prepared or maintained pursuant to the Price 

Funds S-O Code will be considered confidential and shall be maintained and protected 

accordingly. Except as otherwise required by law, the Price Funds S-O Code or as necessary in 

connection with regulations under the Price Funds S-O Code, such matters shall not be disclosed 

to anyone other than the directors of the appropriate Price Fund Board, Outside Counsel to the 

Price Funds, members of the Ethics Committee and the CLC and authorized persons on his or 

her staff. 

Approved: October 2003 

Exhibit A 

Persons Covered by the Price Funds S-O Code of Ethics 

Edward C. Bernard, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer 

Joseph A. Carrier, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer 

Exhibit B 

Chief Legal Counsel to the Price Funds 

Henry H. Hopkins