COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	9 Months Ended
Dec. 30, 2017
Commitments and Contingencies Disclosure [Abstract]
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES	COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings and claims arising out of the ordinary course of its business. We believe that except for those matters described below, there are no other proceedings or claims pending against us the ultimate resolution of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. At each reporting period, management evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable and reasonably estimable under ASC 450, Contingencies, for all matters. Legal costs are expensed as incurred. Litigation and Related Matters Italian Employment Litigation Our Italian manufacturing subsidiary is party to several actions initiated by former employees of our facility in Ascoli-Piceno, Italy. We ceased operations at the facility in fiscal 2014 and sold the property in fiscal 2017. These include actions claiming (i) working conditions and minimum salaries should have been established by either a different classification under their national collective bargaining agreement or a different agreement altogether, (ii) certain solidarity agreements, which are arrangements between the Company, employees and the government to continue full pay and benefits for employees who would otherwise be terminated in times of low demand, are void, and (iii) rights to payment of the extra time used for changing into and out of the working clothes at the beginning and end of each shift. In addition, a union represented in the Ascoli plant filed an action claiming that the Company discriminated against it in favor of three other represented unions by (i) interfering with an employee referendum, (ii) interfering with an employee petition to recall union representatives from office, and (iii) excluding the union from certain meetings. Finally, we have been added as defendants on claims filed against Pall Corporation prior to our acquisition of the plant in August 2012. These claims relate to agreements to "freeze" benefit allowances for a certain period in exchange for Pall's commitments on hiring and plant investment. The total amount of damages claimed by the plaintiffs in these matters is approximately $4.8 million. During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we proposed a settlement offer of $0.8 million, which resulted in charges of $0.4 million during that quarter. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, substantially all of the plaintiffs involved in these claims accepted a settlement offer, which resulted in additional charges of $0.3 million. As of December 30, 2017, we have recorded a total liability of $1.1 million associated with these claims. SOLX Arbitration In July 2016, H2Equity, LLC, formerly known as Hemerus Medical, LLC (“Hemerus”), filed an arbitration claim for $17 million relating to milestone and royalty payments allegedly owed as part of our acquisition of Hemerus' filter and storage solution business, referred to herein as "SOLX", in fiscal 2014. Upon closing of the acquisition in April 2013, Haemonetics paid Hemerus a total of $24 million and agreed to a $3 million milestone payment due when the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") approved a new indication for SOLX (the “24-Hour Approval”) using a filter acquired from Hemerus. We also agreed to make future royalty payments up to a cumulative maximum of $14 million based on the sale of products incorporating SOLX over a ten year period. Due to performance issues with the Hemerus filter, we filed for and received the 24-Hour Approval using a Haemonetics filter. Accordingly, we did not pay Hemerus the $3 million milestone payment because the 24-Hour Approval was obtained using a Haemonetics filter, not a Hemerus filter. Additionally, we have not paid any royalties to date as we have not made any sales of products incorporating SOLX. H2Equity’s July 2016 arbitration claim alleged, in part, that we owed H2Equity $3 million for the receipt of the 24-Hour Approval despite the use of a Haemonetics filter to obtain the approval and that we have failed to make commercially reasonable efforts to market and sell products incorporating SOLX. In January 2018, we entered into a settlement agreement with H2Equity that, together with corresponding settlement documents, provides for a release of H2Equity’s claims against the Company in exchange for the payment of $0.4 million and transfer of SOLX-related intellectual property to H2Equity, along with the parties entry into a supply agreement providing for our supply to H2Equity of Haemonetics filters as used in the 24-Hour Approval. Product Recall In June 2016, we issued a voluntary recall of certain whole blood collection kits sold to our Blood Center customers in the U.S. The recall resulted from some collection sets' filters failing to adequately remove leukocytes from collected blood. As a result of the recall, our Blood Center customers may have conducted tests to confirm that the collected blood was adequately leukoreduced, sold the collected blood labeled as non-leukoreduced at a lower price or discarded the collected blood. During fiscal 2017, we recorded $3.7 million of charges associated with customer returns and inventory reserves and $3.4 million of charges associated with customer claims. We have an enforceable insurance policy in place which will provide coverage for a portion of the customer claims. During fiscal 2017, we recorded $2.9 million of insurance receivables associated with the $3.4 million of charges from customer claims. In January 2018, we entered into formal mediation with a group of customers responsible for substantially all of the total outstanding claims against us. Based upon the parameters of a proposed settlement for the outstanding customer claims that are subject to on-going negotiations, we incurred an additional $5.1 million of charges. The incremental charges were partially offset by an additional $2.1 million of insurance receivables. Both the additional charges and insurance receivables are included in our results for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2017. As of December 30, 2017, we had recorded a cumulative total of $7.2 million of net charges associated with this recall, which consisted of $3.7 million of charges associated with customer returns and inventory reserves and $8.5 million of other customer claims, partially offset by $5.0 million of insurance receivables. Other Matters In February 2017, we informed a customer of our intent to exit an existing contract. The customer made a demand for $4.6 million, which consisted of $2.8 million in damages for non-performance under the contract and $1.8 million for the refund of two upfront payments that the customer had previously paid to us in connection with the development of a project. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we refunded the $1.8 million of upfront payments and entered into a settlement agreement for $2.3 million in connection with this matter. As of December 30, 2017, we reduced our liability to be reflective of this settlement amount.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is a party to various other legal proceedings and claims arising out of the ordinary course of its business. We believe that except for those matters described below, there are no other proceedings or claims pending against us the ultimate resolution of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations. At each reporting period, management evaluates whether or not a potential loss amount or a potential range of loss is probable and reasonably estimable under ASC 450, Contingencies, for all matters. Legal costs are expensed as incurred.

Litigation and Related Matters

Italian Employment Litigation

Our Italian manufacturing subsidiary is party to several actions initiated by former employees of our facility in Ascoli-Piceno, Italy. We ceased operations at the facility in fiscal 2014 and sold the property in fiscal 2017. These include actions claiming (i) working conditions and minimum salaries should have been established by either a different classification under their national collective bargaining agreement or a different agreement altogether, (ii) certain solidarity agreements, which are arrangements between the Company, employees and the government to continue full pay and benefits for employees who would otherwise be terminated in times of low demand, are void, and (iii) rights to payment of the extra time used for changing into and out of the working clothes at the beginning and end of each shift.

In addition, a union represented in the Ascoli plant filed an action claiming that the Company discriminated against it in favor of three other represented unions by (i) interfering with an employee referendum, (ii) interfering with an employee petition to recall union representatives from office, and (iii) excluding the union from certain meetings.

Finally, we have been added as defendants on claims filed against Pall Corporation prior to our acquisition of the plant in August 2012. These claims relate to agreements to "freeze" benefit allowances for a certain period in exchange for Pall's commitments on hiring and plant investment.

The total amount of damages claimed by the plaintiffs in these matters is approximately $4.8 million. During the second quarter of fiscal 2018, we proposed a settlement offer of $0.8 million, which resulted in charges of $0.4 million during that quarter. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, substantially all of the plaintiffs involved in these claims accepted a settlement offer, which resulted in additional charges of $0.3 million. As of December 30, 2017, we have recorded a total liability of $1.1 million associated with these claims.

SOLX Arbitration

In July 2016, H2Equity, LLC, formerly known as Hemerus Medical, LLC (“Hemerus”), filed an arbitration claim for $17 million relating to milestone and royalty payments allegedly owed as part of our acquisition of Hemerus' filter and storage solution business, referred to herein as "SOLX", in fiscal 2014.

Upon closing of the acquisition in April 2013, Haemonetics paid Hemerus a total of $24 million and agreed to a $3 million milestone payment due when the United States Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") approved a new indication for SOLX (the “24-Hour Approval”) using a filter acquired from Hemerus. We also agreed to make future royalty payments up to a cumulative maximum of $14 million based on the sale of products incorporating SOLX over a ten year period.

Due to performance issues with the Hemerus filter, we filed for and received the 24-Hour Approval using a Haemonetics filter. Accordingly, we did not pay Hemerus the $3 million milestone payment because the 24-Hour Approval was obtained using a Haemonetics filter, not a Hemerus filter. Additionally, we have not paid any royalties to date as we have not made any sales of products incorporating SOLX.

H2Equity’s July 2016 arbitration claim alleged, in part, that we owed H2Equity $3 million for the receipt of the 24-Hour Approval despite the use of a Haemonetics filter to obtain the approval and that we have failed to make commercially reasonable efforts to market and sell products incorporating SOLX. In January 2018, we entered into a settlement agreement with H2Equity that, together with corresponding settlement documents, provides for a release of H2Equity’s claims against the Company in exchange for the payment of $0.4 million and transfer of SOLX-related intellectual property to H2Equity, along with the parties entry into a supply agreement providing for our supply to H2Equity of Haemonetics filters as used in the 24-Hour Approval.

Product Recall

In June 2016, we issued a voluntary recall of certain whole blood collection kits sold to our Blood Center customers in the U.S. The recall resulted from some collection sets' filters failing to adequately remove leukocytes from collected blood. As a result of the recall, our Blood Center customers may have conducted tests to confirm that the collected blood was adequately leukoreduced, sold the collected blood labeled as non-leukoreduced at a lower price or discarded the collected blood. During fiscal 2017, we recorded $3.7 million of charges associated with customer returns and inventory reserves and $3.4 million of charges associated with customer claims. We have an enforceable insurance policy in place which will provide coverage for a portion of the customer claims. During fiscal 2017, we recorded $2.9 million of insurance receivables associated with the $3.4 million of charges from customer claims.

In January 2018, we entered into formal mediation with a group of customers responsible for substantially all of the total outstanding claims against us. Based upon the parameters of a proposed settlement for the outstanding customer claims that are subject to on-going negotiations, we incurred an additional $5.1 million of charges. The incremental charges were partially offset by an additional $2.1 million of insurance receivables. Both the additional charges and insurance receivables are included in our results for the three and nine months ended December 30, 2017.

As of December 30, 2017, we had recorded a cumulative total of $7.2 million of net charges associated with this recall, which consisted of $3.7 million of charges associated with customer returns and inventory reserves and $8.5 million of other customer claims, partially offset by $5.0 million of insurance receivables.

Other Matters

In February 2017, we informed a customer of our intent to exit an existing contract. The customer made a demand for $4.6 million, which consisted of $2.8 million in damages for non-performance under the contract and $1.8 million for the refund of two upfront payments that the customer had previously paid to us in connection with the development of a project. During the third quarter of fiscal 2018, we refunded the $1.8 million of upfront payments and entered into a settlement agreement for $2.3 million in connection with this matter. As of December 30, 2017, we reduced our liability to be reflective of this settlement amount.