XML 88 R18.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Note 9 - Income Taxes
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2013
Income Tax Disclosure [Text Block]
NOTE 9:  INCOME TAXES

Kodak’s income tax provision (benefit) and effective tax rate were as follows:

(in millions)
 
Three Months Ended
 
   
March 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Earnings (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes
  $ 302     $ (415 )
Effective tax rate
    2.3 %     25.3 %
Provision (benefit) for income taxes
  $ 7     $ (105 )
Provision (benefit) for income taxes @ 35%
  $ 106     $ (145 )
Difference between tax at effective vs. statutory rate
  $ (99 )   $ 40  
                 

For the three months ended March 31, 2013, the difference between the Company’s recorded benefit and the benefit that would result from applying the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily attributable to: (1) losses generated within the U.S. and certain jurisdictions outside the U.S. for which no benefit was recognized due to management’s conclusion that it was more likely than not that the tax benefits would not be realized, (2) a provision associated with withholding taxes on the sale of intellectual property, (3) a benefit associated with the tax impact of the goodwill impairment recognized during the quarter and (4) changes in audit reserves.

For the three months ended March 31, 2012, the difference between the Company’s recorded benefit and the provision that would result from applying the U.S. statutory rate of 35.0% is primarily attributable to: (1) losses generated within the U.S. and certain jurisdictions outside the U.S. for which no benefit was recognized due to management’s conclusion that it was more likely than not that the tax benefits would not be realized, (2) a provision associated with the establishment of a deferred tax asset valuation allowance outside the U.S., (3) a benefit as a result of the Company reaching a settlement of a competent authority claim, and (4) a benefit associated with tax accounting impacts related to items reported in Accumulated other comprehensive loss.

In March 2011, Kodak filed a Request for Competent Authority Assistance with the United States Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”).  The request related to a potential double taxation issue with respect to certain patent licensing royalty payments received by Kodak in 2012 and 2011.  In the twelve months ended December 31, 2012, Kodak received notification that the IRS had reached agreement with the Korean National Tax Service (“NTS”) with regards to Kodak’s March 2011 request.  As a result of the agreement reached by the IRS and NTS, Kodak was due a partial refund of Korean withholding taxes in the amount of $123 million.  Kodak had previously agreed with the licensees that made the royalty payments that any refunds of the related Korean withholding taxes would be shared equally between Kodak and the licensees.  The licensees’ share ($61 million) of the Korean withholding tax refund has therefore been reported as a licensing revenue reduction in Licensing & royalties in the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

During the first quarter of 2012, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets outside the U.S. would not be realized and accordingly, recorded a tax provision of $16 million associated with the establishment of a valuation allowance on those deferred tax assets.