XML 118 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS  
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

17.                               RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

 

The Company leases furnished office space and computers to affiliates. Lease revenues were $4.7 million, $4.6 million, and $3.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. The Company purchases data processing, legal, investment, and management services from affiliates. The costs of such services were $154.7 million, $143.0 million, and $135.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.  In addition, the Company has an intercompany payable with affiliates as of December 31, 2012 and 2011 of $10.3 million and $26.8 million, respectively and an intercompany receivable with affiliates of $6.0 million and $34.0 million as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, respectively.

 

Certain corporations with which PLC’s directors were affiliated paid us premiums and policy fees or other amounts for various types of insurance and investment products, interest on bonds we own and commissions on securities underwritings in which our affiliates participated. Such amounts totaled $59.1 million, $51.0 million, and $13.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively. In addition, in 2010, PLC also received a $5 million deposit from Regions Bank Stable Principal Fund related to a Guaranteed Investment Contract sold by PLC. The Company and/or PLC paid commissions, interest on debt and investment products, and fees to these same corporations totaling $13.0 million, $4.6 million, and $7.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011, and 2010, respectively.

 

PLC has guaranteed the Company’s obligations for borrowings or letters of credit under the revolving line of credit arrangement to which PLC is also a party. PLC has also issued guarantees, entered into support agreements and/or assumed a duty to indemnify its indirect wholly owned captive insurance companies in certain respects. In addition, as of December 31, 2012, PLC is the sole holder of the $800 million balance of outstanding surplus notes issued by one such wholly owned captive insurance company, Golden Gate.

 

As of February 1, 2000, PLC guaranteed the obligations of the Company under a synthetic lease entered into by the Company, as lessee, with a non-affiliated third party, as lessor. Under the terms of the synthetic lease, financing of $75 million was available to the Company for construction of a new office building and parking deck. The synthetic lease was amended and restated as of January 11, 2007, wherein as of December 31, 2012, PLC continues to guarantee the obligations of the Company thereunder.

 

The Company has agreements with certain of its subsidiaries under which it provides administrative services for a fee.  These services include but are not limited to accounting, financial reporting, compliance, policy administration, reserve computations, and projections. In addition, the Company and its subsidiaries pay PLC for investment, legal and data processing services.

 

The Company and/or certain of its affiliates have reinsurance agreements in place with companies owned by PLC. These agreements relate to certain portions of our service contract business which is included within the Asset Protection segment. These transactions are eliminated at the PLC consolidated level.

 

The Company has also entered into intercompany reinsurance agreements that provide for a more balanced mix of business at various insurance entities. These transactions were eliminated in consolidation.

 

During 2012, PLC entered into an intercompany capital support agreement with Shades Creek Captive Insurance Company (“Shades Creek”), a direct wholly-owned insurance subsidiary. The agreement provides through a guarantee that PLC will contribute assets or purchase surplus notes (or cause an affiliate or third party to contribute assets or purchase surplus notes) in amounts necessary for Shades Creek’s regulatory capital levels to equal or exceed minimum thresholds as defined by the agreement. As of December 31, 2012, Shades Creek maintained capital levels in excess of the required minimum thresholds. The maximum potential future payment amount which could be required under the capital support agreement will be dependent on numerous factors, including the performance of equity markets, the level of interest rates, performance of associated hedges, and related policyholder behavior.