-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, Dk4RDqUumLDDX2RZJB/EnaJe6zUEz+uPHY8ztuI36UGanTQM+fMhC6ifu7I9ctAq Y0crEYBRkltwONvSfiRDfQ== 0000950133-99-002759.txt : 19990816 0000950133-99-002759.hdr.sgml : 19990816 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000950133-99-002759 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 3 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 19990630 FILED AS OF DATE: 19990813 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000310624 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: SERVICES-COMPUTER PROGRAMMING, DATA PROCESSING, ETC. [7370] IRS NUMBER: 540856778 STATE OF INCORPORATION: DE FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-09233 FILM NUMBER: 99689278 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 4050 LEGATO RD CITY: FAIRFAX STATE: VA ZIP: 22033 BUSINESS PHONE: 7032678000 10-Q 1 FORM 10-Q 1 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ---------- FORM 10-Q X QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES - ----- EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Quarterly Period Ended June 30, 1999 OR TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES - ----- EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the Transition Period From: To: ------------------- ------------------- Commission File No.: 0-9233 AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) State or other Jurisdiction of I.R.S. Employer Incorporation or Organization: Delaware Identification No.: 54-0856778 4050 Legato Road Fairfax, Virginia 22033 (Address of principal executive office) Registrant's Telephone No., Including Area Code: (703) 267-8000 Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES X NO ----- ----- As of August 6, 1999 42,027,899 shares of common stock were outstanding. 1 2 CONTENTS
Page ---- Part I Financial Information --------------------- Item 1. Financial Statements......................................... 1 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.................................... 8 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk... 18 Part II Other Information ----------------- Item 1. Legal Proceedings............................................ 18 Item 2. Changes in Securities........................................ 18 Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities.............................. 18 Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders.......... 18 Item 5. Other Information............................................ 19 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K............................. 19
3 PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION Item 1. Financial Statements The information furnished in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations, Consolidated Revenues by Market, Consolidated Balance Sheets, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income reflects all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations and financial condition for the interim periods. The accompanying financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 1998, included in the American Management Systems, Incorporated (the "Company" or "AMS") Annual Report on Form 10-K (File No. 0-9233) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1999. 1 4 American Management Systems, Incorporated CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS(1) Unaudited (In millions except per share data)
For the Quarter For the Six Months Ended June 30, Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1999 1998 -------- -------- -------- -------- REVENUES .......................................... $ 305.3 $ 250.7 $ 596.2 $ 473.7 EXPENSES Client Project Expenses................... 166.1 141.1 318.8 264.4 Other Operating Expenses.................. 87.9 71.4 177.3 139.4 Corporate Expenses........................ 22.1 17.3 43.0 32.9 Provision for Specific Contract........... 20.0 - 20.0 - -------- -------- -------- -------- 296.1 229.8 559.1 436.7 INCOME FROM OPERATIONS............................. 9.2 20.9 37.1 37.0 OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE Interest (Income) Expense................. 0.2 0.6 0.1 1.1 Other (Income) Expense.................... 0.1 - 1.0 0.4 Loss on Investments in Other Companies.... 1.1 - 1.4 - -------- -------- -------- -------- 1.4 0.6 2.5 1.5 INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES......................... 7.8 20.3 34.6 35.5 INCOME TAXES....................................... 3.2 8.3 14.2 14.5 -------- -------- -------- -------- NET INCOME......................................... $ 4.6 $ 12.0 $ 20.4 $ 21.0 ======== ======== ======== ======== WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES............................ 42.5 42.3 42.3 42.1 ======== ======== ======== ======== BASIC NET INCOME PER SHARE......................... $ 0.11 $ 0.29 $ 0.48 $ 0.50 ======== ======== ======== ======== WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES AND EQUIVALENTS............ 43.2 43.1 43.2 42.9 ======== ======== ======== ======== DILUTED NET INCOME PER SHARE....................... $ 0.10 $ 0.28 $ 0.47 $ 0.49 ======== ======== ======== ========
- --------------------- (1) Certain amounts have been reclassified for comparative purposes. 2 5 American Management Systems, Incorporated CONSOLIDATED REVENUES BY MARKET(1) Unaudited (In millions)
For the Quarter For the Six Months Ended June 30, Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1999 1998 -------- -------- -------- -------- Telecommunications Firms....................... $ 84.0 $ 63.5 $ 158.3 $ 121.8 Financial Services Institutions................ 47.4 53.6 94.2 100.1 State and Local Governments and Education...... 83.4 63.1 171.6 113.8 Federal Government Agencies.................... 74.7 58.3 139.7 112.8 Other Corporate Clients........................ 15.8 12.2 32.4 25.2 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total Revenues................................. $ 305.3 $ 250.7 $ 596.2 $ 473.7 ======== ======== ======== ========
- --------------------- (1) Certain amounts have been reclassified for comparative purposes. 3 6 American Management Systems, Incorporated CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In millions except per share data)
6/30/99 ASSETS (Unaudited) 12/31/98 ----------- ---------- CURRENT ASSETS Cash and Cash Equivalents.......................................... $115.0 $119.3 Accounts and Notes Receivable...................................... 256.6 260.3 Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets.......................... 10.5 8.8 ------ ------ 382.1 388.4 FIXED ASSETS Equipment ....................................................... 54.7 59.7 Furniture and Fixtures............................................. 23.7 23.6 Leasehold Improvements............................................. 16.4 17.3 ------ ------ 94.8 100.6 Accumulated Depreciation and Amortization.......................... (64.0) (63.0) ------ ------ 30.8 37.6 OTHER ASSETS Purchased and Developed Computer Software (Net of Accumulated Amortization of $82,800,000 and $72,000,000).................... 99.9 83.6 Intangibles (Net of Accumulated Amortization of $5,000,000 and $4,700,000)...................................................... 6.6 4.3 Other Assets (Net of Accumulated Amortization of $990,000 and $920,000) ....................................................... 28.7 23.7 ------ ------ 135.2 111.6 ------ ------ TOTAL ASSETS ....................................................... $548.1 $537.6 ====== ======
4 7 American Management Systems, Incorporated CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (In millions except per share data)
6/30/99 LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (Unaudited) 12/31/98 ----------- ---------- CURRENT LIABILITIES Notes Payable and Capitalized Lease Obligations....................... $ 6.3 $ 5.3 Accounts Payable...................................................... 14.0 21.3 Accrued Incentive Compensation........................................ 20.0 55.8 Other Accrued Compensation and Related Items.......................... 44.3 39.8 Deferred Revenues..................................................... 42.2 37.7 Other Accrued Liabilities............................................. 8.7 4.8 Provision for Contract Losses......................................... 27.2 7.3 Income Taxes Payable.................................................. 0.8 9.1 ------ ------ 163.5 181.1 Deferred Income Taxes................................................. 6.4 4.9 ------ ------ 169.9 186.0 NONCURRENT LIABILITIES Notes Payable and Capitalized Lease Obligations....................... 19.6 22.7 Other Accrued Liabilities............................................. 25.6 15.9 Deferred Income Taxes................................................. 21.2 21.1 ------ ------ 66.4 59.7 ------ ------ TOTAL LIABILITIES .......................................................... 236.3 245.7 STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY Preferred Stock ($0.10 Par Value; 4,000,000 Shares Authorized, None Issued or Outstanding) Common Stock ($0.01 Par Value; 200,000,000 Shares Authorized, 51,057,214 and 51,057,214 Issued and 42,477,724 and 42,026,510 Outstanding)........................................................ 0.5 0.5 Capital in Excess of Par Value........................................ 89.2 96.7 Retained Earnings..................................................... 260.7 240.3 Currency Translation Adjustment....................................... (11.3) (6.3) Common Stock in Treasury, at Cost (8,579,490 and 9,030,704 Shares).... (27.1) (39.3) ------ ------ 311.8 291.9 ------ ------ TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY..................................... $548.1 $537.6 ====== ======
5 8 American Management Systems, Incorporated CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS Unaudited (In millions)
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 1999 1998 -------- -------- CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: Net Income ........................................................... $ 20.4 $ 21.0 Adjustments to Reconcile Net Income to Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities: Depreciation .................................................... 6.9 8.8 Amortization..................................................... 11.6 8.2 Loss on Investments in Other Companies........................... 1.4 - Deferred Income Taxes............................................ 1.6 5.7 Provision for Doubtful Accounts.................................. 3.8 6.8 Provision for Contract Losses.................................... 20.0 - Changes in Assets and Liabilities: (Increase) Decrease in Trade Receivables......................... (0.1) 11.3 Increase in Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets............ (1.7) (0.4) Increase in Other Assets......................................... (6.4) (7.2) Decrease in Accrued Incentive Compensation....................... (30.6) (10.7) Increase in Accounts Payable, Other Accrued Compensation, and Liabilities................................. 10.7 9.1 Increase (Decrease) in Deferred Revenue.......................... 4.4 (10.0) Decrease in Income Taxes Payable................................. (8.3) (2.4) ------- ------ Net Cash Provided by Operating Activities.............................. 33.7 40.2 ------- ------ CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: Purchase of Fixed Assets............................................... (3.5) (4.1) Purchase of Computer Software and Investment in Software Products ..... (27.7) (15.7) Other Investments and Intangibles...................................... (2.7) 1.0 Proceeds from Sale of Fixed Assets and Purchased Computer Software..... 3.6 0.4 ------ ------ Net Cash Used in Investing Activities.................................. (30.3) (18.4) ------ ------ CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Borrowings .......................................................... - - Payments on Borrowings................................................. (2.1) (5.2) Proceeds from Common Stock Options Exercised........................... 5.3 8.0 Payments to Acquire Treasury Stock..................................... (5.9) (0.4) ------ ------ Net Cash (Used in) Provided by Financing Activities.................... (2.7) 2.4 ------ ------ DECREASE IN CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT.................................. (5.0) (0.3) ------ ------ NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS......................... (4.3) 23.9 CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD............................. 119.3 49.6 ------ ------ CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF PERIOD................................... $115.0 $ 73.5 ====== ====== NON-CASH OPERATING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES: Treasury Stock Utilized to Satisfy Accrued Incentive Compensation Liability.............................................. $ 5.2 $ - Treasury Stock Utilized to Satisfy Stock Options Exercised............. $ 7.6 $ -
6 9 American Management Systems, Incorporated CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME Unaudited (In millions)
For the Quarter For the Six Months Ended June 30, Ended June 30, 1999 1998 1999 1998 -------- -------- -------- -------- NET INCOME ............................... $ 4.6 $ 12.0 $ 20.4 $ 21.0 OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS): Currency Translation Adjustment..... (1.4) - (5.0) (0.3) ------ ------ ------ ------ COMPREHENSIVE INCOME...................... $ 3.2 $ 12.0 $ 15.4 $ 20.7 ====== ====== ====== ======
7 10 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations This Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations ("MD&A") contains certain forward-looking statements. In addition, the Company or its representatives from time to time may make, or may have made, certain forward-looking statements, orally or in writing, including, without limitation, any such statements made in this MD&A, press releases, or any such statements made, or to be made, in the MD&A contained in other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Company wishes to ensure that such forward-looking statements are accompanied by meaningful cautionary statements so as to ensure, to the fullest extent possible, the protections of the safe harbor established by section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended and section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Accordingly, such forward-looking statements made by, or on behalf of, the Company are qualified in their entirety by reference to, and are accompanied by, the discussion herein of important factors that could cause the Company's actual results to differ materially from those projected in such forward-looking statements. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the percentage of revenues of major items in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the percentage change in such items from period to period (see "Financial Statements"). The effect of inflation and price changes on the Company's revenues, income from operations, and expenses is generally comparable to the general rate of inflation in the U.S. economy.
Percentage of Total Revenues Period-to-Period Change -------------- ----------------------- Quarter Ended Quarter Ended Six Months Ended June 30, June 30, 1999 June 30, 1999 vs. vs. 1999 1998 June 30, 1998 June 30, 1998 -------- ------- ------------- ------------- Revenues.................................. 100.0% 100.0% 21.8% 25.9% Expenses Client Project Expenses............. 54.4 56.3 17.7 20.6 Other Operating Expenses............ 28.8 28.5 23.1 27.2 Corporate Expenses.................. 7.2 6.9 27.7 30.7 Provision for Specific Contract..... 6.6 0.0 ----- ----- Total............................... 97.0 91.7 28.9 28.0 Income from Operations.................... 3.0 8.3 (56.0) 0.3 Other (Income) Expense.................... 0.5 0.2 133.3 66.7 ----- ----- Income Before Income Taxes................ 2.5 8.1 (61.6) (2.5) Income Taxes.............................. 1.0 3.3 (61.4) (2.1) ----- ----- Net Income................................ 1.5 4.8 (61.7) (2.9) Weighted Average Shares................... 0.5 0.5 Basic Net Income per Share................ (62.1) (4.0) Weighted Average Shares and Equivalents... 0.2 0.7 Diluted Net Income per Share.............. (64.3) (4.1)
8 11 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS (continued) REVENUES Revenues increased 22% during the second quarter and 26% during the first six months of 1999, compared to the same 1998 periods. For the second quarter and first six months of 1999, growth occurred in all target markets except the Financial Services Institutions market. Looking ahead to the rest of 1999, the Company expects revenue growth company-wide to continue at approximately the same rates that were experienced in 1998. Business with non-US clients increased 7% (to $56.2 million) during the second quarter and 8% (to $109.9 million) for the first six months of 1999, compared to the same 1998 periods. Business with non-US clients now represents 18% of the Company's revenues. The Company increased its non-US client base and expanded the number of services offered to these clients. For the year 1999, the Company expects non-US business and European business in particular, to exceed 1998 levels, mainly in the Telecommunications Firms and the State and Local Governments and Education target markets. As part of its growth strategy the Company has formed a cross-target market practice that will focus on delivering high-value, customer-facing Web solutions - including eBill, eCare and eMarketing - tailored to clients in financial services, telecommunications, government and utilities. These solutions will help firms achieve greater cost savings, deliver improved customer service and leverage cross-sell and up-sell opportunities in their markets. The new "eCustomer" practice builds upon the Company's existing, significant eCommerce client base. In the Telecommunications Firms market, a market characterized by large projects with relatively few clients, revenues increased 32% in the second quarter and 30% for the first six months, compared to the same 1998 periods. This revenue increase reflects the Company's continued success in acquiring new clients, expanding service offerings, and initiating several systems integration engagements within the Telecommunications Firms market. Non-US revenues in this market increased 18% (to $36.0 million) for the quarter and 14% (to $69.0 million) for the first six months, compared to the same 1998 periods. For the year 1999, the Company anticipates revenue growth in this market to increase at the same rate of increase experienced in the first half of 1999. The Company's development of its next generation of customer care and billing software, known as "Tapestry", is continuing to progress through a contract with a European client. Because that client is sharing part of the cost of development, collections from that contract will not contribute to revenue growth in this market in 1999; rather, they will reduce capitalized software costs. Key software deliveries have been made in the first half of 1999 and the Company is targeting another delivery of the software late in the second half of 1999. There is significant market interest in Tapestry. Notwithstanding actual and projected revenue growth, there continue to be risks in this market. Competition for experienced staff is especially intense in the telecommunications field, and staffing remains one of the Company's critical challenges for the Telecommunications Firms market. Additionally, the Company works in countries located in regions other than Western Europe and North America and the delivery risks in these other countries may be higher. Revenues in the Telecommunications Firms market in these countries were less than 4% of the Company's total revenues for the first half of 1999. In the Financial Services Institutions target market, 1999 revenues decreased 12% and 6% in the second quarter and first half, respectively, when compared to the same 1998 periods. This decrease is due to large projects winding down in the fourth quarter of 1998 and certain new projects not ramping up until late in the second quarter of 1999. Business with non-US clients, primarily European, accounted for approximately 36% of both the second quarter revenues ($16.9 million) and of the six months revenues ($34.2 million) in this market. For 1999, the Company anticipates revenue growth in this market to 9 12 increase at rates below the Company's overall revenue growth rate, with increasing revenues in the second half of 1999. The Company believes that there are Year 2000 compliance-related business impacts in this market but has not been able to estimate their magnitude. In the State and Local Governments and Education target market, revenues increased 32% in the second quarter and 51% in the first half of 1999, compared to the same 1998 periods. The revenue increase was driven by the rapid build-up of several large contracts with state taxation departments looking to make substantial improvements in their ability to collect delinquent taxes and several new engagements for financial and revenue systems. Several of these financial management systems are to be delivered early in the second half of 1999. The Company enjoys strong demand in this market. On certain of the contracts with state taxation departments, the Company's fees are paid out of the benefits (increased collections) that the client achieves. On benefit-funded contracts (contracts whereby the amounts due the Company are payable based on actual benefits derived by the client), the Company defers recognition of revenues until that point at which management can predict, with reasonable certainty, that the benefit stream will generate amounts sufficient to fund the contract. From that point forward, revenues are recognized on a percentage of completion basis. Beginning in the second quarter of 1998, the Company started work on several large multi-year benefit-funded contracts, all of which are currently being recognized on a percentage of completion basis. Revenues for 1999 in the State and Local Governments and Education market are expected to increase over 1998 at a rate approximating the Company's overall revenue growth rate and thus at significantly lower rates than experienced in the first half of 1999 compared with the same period in 1998. Revenues in the Federal Government Agencies target market increased 28% during the second quarter and 24% during the first six months of 1999, compared to the same 1998 periods. This increase was attributable predominantly to the award in mid-1997 of a significant multi-year contract with the Department of Defense for its Standard Procurement System ("SPS"), which accounted for 30% of both the 1999 second quarter and first half revenue growth. In addition, there was increased business with existing clients and new business with both defense and civilian agencies. For the year 1999, the Company expects revenues in this target market to increase over 1998 at a rate approximating the Company's overall revenue growth rate. These revenue increases will continue to be driven primarily by the SPS contract and by contracts with clients using the Company's federal financial systems. Revenues in the Other Corporate Clients market increased 30% during the second quarter and 29% during the first half of 1999, compared to the same 1998 period. The 1999 increase is mainly attributable to increased business with new clients in the electric and gas utilities market and the health care market. For all of 1999, the Company expects revenue growth in this market to increase at the same rate of growth experienced in the first half of 1999. EXPENSES Client project expenses and other operating expenses together increased 20% during the second quarter and 23% during first half of 1999, compared to the same 1998 periods. Both of these increases were slightly lower than the growth rate in revenues in the comparable periods. For all of 1999, the Company anticipates that these expenses will continue to grow at rates lower than the revenue growth rate. The Company expects to make significant expenditures related to research and development of the "Tapestry" software. A majority of these expenditures will be capitalized. Once the Tapestry software is completed and delivered, currently targeted for late in the second half of 1999, amortization will begin. No client project expense or other operating expense was required to be recorded as a result of the cancellation by the State of Mississippi of a contract for the development by the Company of a revenue management system to be used by the Mississippi State Tax Commission. During the second quarter of 1999, the Company recorded a charge against its allowance for doubtful accounts, in the amount of $2.4 million, to write-off all 10 13 accounts receivable associated with this contract. See "Other Information - Legal Proceedings" in Part II below for information about the status of the lawsuit pending in connection with this contract. Corporate Expenses increased 28% during the second quarter and 31% for the first six months of 1999, compared to the same 1998 periods. Corporate expenses increased faster than the revenue growth during the first half of 1999, due to the dedication of resources applied to the Year 2000 remediation of internal systems, increases in accruals for corporate level performance-based incentive compensation, and profit-based compensation accruals under the Company's restricted stock program. For the year 1999, the Company expects corporate expenses to grow slightly above the Company's revenue growth rate. During the second quarter of 1999, the Company recorded a $20 million provision to cover ongoing disputes on a contract between an AMS subsidiary and Bezeq, the Israeli telephone company ("Bezeq"). This contract was signed in 1997 and has been problematic since that time. Until very recently, management believed that the differences could be resolved and that work could be performed within the reserves established in 1998. Current events now make this most unlikely. At the end of the first half of 1999, the cumulative reserves ($27 million) represent management's judgement of the total expected impact of this dispute on the Company's consolidated financial statements. INCOME FROM OPERATIONS Income from operations decreased 56% for the second quarter and was flat for the first half of 1999, compared to the same 1998 periods. This decrease is due to the above-mentioned provision taken on the Bezeq contract. Absent this provision, income from operations would have increased 40% during the second quarter and 54% during the first half of 1999 compared to the same 1998 periods. The Company's profit margins have continued to improve due to an ongoing emphasis on well-structured and priced engagements and tightly managed delivery risk. In addition, the Company is continuing to focus on controlling expenses. For 1999 as a whole, the Company will continue to emphasize managed growth and expects improved profit margins when compared with 1998 results. OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE Interest (income) expense decreased 67% during the second quarter and 91% during the first half of 1999 compared with the same periods in 1998, because of lower amounts of short-term borrowings, as a result of significantly improved cash flow from operations. In addition, the increased cash from operations was invested in short-term instruments, which resulted in higher interest income. Other (income) expense increased in the first half of 1999, compared to the same period in 1998, primarily because of a write-off of certain leasehold improvements and fixed assets. In late 1998, the Company established a joint venture with Bank of Montreal to provide online processing services for loan applications to small and mid-size financial institutions via a new firm, Competix, L.L.C. The Company incurred a loss of $1.1 million during the second quarter and $1.4 million during the first half of 1999 related to this joint venture, due to the continued start up costs of this new company. FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE Approximately 18% of the Company's 1999 first half revenues were derived from non-US business. The Company's practice is to negotiate contracts in the same currency, in which the predominant expenses are incurred, thereby mitigating the exposure to foreign currency exchange fluctuations. It is not possible to accomplish this in all cases; thus, there is some risk that profits will be 11 14 affected by foreign currency exchange fluctuations. However, the Company seeks to negotiate provisions in contracts with non-US clients that allow pricing adjustments related to currency fluctuations. In a further effort to mitigate foreign currency exchange risk, the Company has established a notional cash pool with a European bank. This arrangement allows the Company to better utilize its cash resources among all of the Company's subsidiaries, without incurring foreign currency conversion risks, thereby mitigating foreign currency exposure for these transactions. The Company also actively manages the excess cash balances in the cash pool, which will increase interest income on short-term investments. During the past two years, the Company also has employed limited hedging of intercompany balance sheet transactions through derivative instruments (foreign currency swap contracts); however, as of June 30, 1999, the Company had no outstanding derivative contracts. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES The Company provides for its operating cash requirements primarily through funds generated from operations. Through an available bank facility, the Company can also provide for cash and currency management with respect to the short-term impact of certain cyclical uses, such as annual payments of incentive compensation as well as financing from time to time accounts receivable. At June 30, 1999, the Company's cash and cash equivalents totaled $115 million, slightly down from $119.3 million at the end of 1998. Cash provided by operating activities for the first half of 1999 was $33.7 million which reflects the above-mentioned contract provision. During the first half of 1999, the Company invested over $30.3 million in fixed assets, software purchases, and computer software. Revolving line-of-credit borrowings were zero at June 30, 1999. During the first half, the Company made approximately $2.1 million in installment payments of principal on outstanding debt owed to banks; the Company also received proceeds of approximately $5.3 million during the period from the exercise of stock options and the tax benefits related thereto. The Company repurchased approximately 176,000 shares of common stock, during the first half of 1999, at a cost of $5.9 million. At June 30, 1999, the Company's debt-equity ratio, as measured by total liabilities divided by stockholders' equity was 0.76, down from 0.84 at December 31, 1998. The Company's material unused source of liquidity at the end of the first half of 1999 consisted of $120.0 million under the multi-currency revolving credit agreement with Bank of America and Wachovia Bank as agents. The Company believes that its liquidity needs can be met from the various sources described above. As required by the original terms of its contract with the client, the Company has entered into bank guarantees due upon request for performance under its contract with Bezeq. At June 30, 1999, the Company had $19.8 million outstanding under such bank guarantees. See "Results of Operations - Expenses," above for additional information about the Bezeq contract. On August 8, 1999, the Company sought and received a temporary injunction from the Jerusalem District Court prohibiting Bezeq from realizing on the guarantees. In the event the Jerusalem District Court does not grant a permanent injunction after a hearing on the Company's petition, and Bezeq were to call on these guarantees, there should not be any material adverse effect on the Company's liquidity. 12 15 YEAR 2000 ISSUES Companies in the business of providing information technology services, software products or custom-developed software, such as the Company, face "Year 2000 compliance" issues in at least three critical areas: internal information and communication technology systems, client software systems, and embedded systems (products which are made with microprocessor (computer) chips such as environmental systems, physical security systems and elevators). "Year 2000 compliance" means the ability of hardware, software and other processing capabilities to interpret and manipulate correctly all date data up to and through the year 2000, including proper computation of leap years. With respect to embedded systems, Year 2000 compliance means that the occurrence of the Year 2000 will not cause the product in which the microprocessor chip is embedded to fail to operate properly. Failure of hardware, software and related capabilities used by the Company or, under certain circumstances, furnished to clients, to be Year 2000 compliant could have a material adverse impact on the Company. Accordingly, the Company is focusing at the most senior levels on Year 2000 issues. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, in conjunction with the Company's Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer, the Company's Internal Auditor and others, is monitoring the Company's analysis and status with respect to Year 2000 issues. Year 2000 program managers have been designated throughout the Company to oversee Year 2000 efforts and provide periodic reports, on at least a quarterly basis, to the senior management and the Internal Auditor of the Company. Incentive compensation programs currently include achievement of Year 2000 compliance objectives. Funds expended and to be expended on Year 2000 compliance have been allocated out of the Company's normal operating budget. The Company has not delayed any significant projects as a result of its investment of resources on Year 2000 issues. Early in 1997, the Company completed reviews of its major internal application systems for Year 2000 compliance. The Company began a program of testing and remediation for its application systems in 1997. The company-wide application subsystems have now been remediated and have successfully passed unit testing. A system integration test of the combined functioning of company-wide application subsystems began, on schedule, on March 3, 1999. The integration testing for significant transactions required through early 2000 was completed on schedule in the first half of 1999. The integration testing for other significant year 2000 and 2001 transactions is expected to be completed during the third quarter of 1999. In addition to the scheduled early completion date of testing, the Company has also developed certain other contingency plans relating to these internal systems. The Company has also developed and implemented a limited incentive program to encourage certain experienced internal systems programmers to remain with the Company through the summer of the Year 2000. With respect to its company-wide hardware infrastructure, the Company has obtained Year 2000 certifications from many of the outside vendors with whom the Company contracts for the provision of utilities, goods and certain internal functionality. The Company is continuing to work to obtain outstanding certifications from the remaining outside vendors at this time. In addition to relying on certifications from outside vendors where available, the Company is also engaged in a program of testing certain subcomponents of and interfaces with the systems provided by the outside vendors. In addition, the Company is coordinating centrally its worldwide efforts to achieve Year 2000 compliance of its internal hardware and application systems that are not company-wide by third quarter 1999. Total costs of achieving Year 2000 compliance in the Company's internal systems, which costs will be expensed as they are incurred are estimated to be approximately $3.5 million for 1999, and $0.5 13 16 million for 2000. For the past three years, approximately $4.4 million has been expended by the Company on Year 2000 compliance in respect of its internal systems. With respect to its clients, the Company does not presently anticipate material costs or risks allocable specifically to Year 2000 compliance issues, but is continuing to assess the scope and status of such risks. Client engagements for specific Year 2000 remediation work have not been a strategic marketing focus. However, in many of the Company's existing engagements, Year 2000 replacement work is implicit, as the Company's clients are replacing systems for various business reasons. In addition, the Company has accepted limited engagements in which it assists clients with the performance of their own Year 2000 projects. The Company has drafted these contracts to limit or exclude liability for Year 2000 related claims and does not anticipate any special risks or costs attributable to Year 2000 compliance issues in performing such projects. With respect to contractual obligations to active clients (clients for which the Company is still obligated to furnish products or services, such as maintenance), the Company similarly does not anticipate in the aggregate material costs or risks associated with Year 2000 compliance. Its contracts with active clients primarily are either for recent or new software that is Year 2000 compliant or for which a Year 2000 compliant upgrade is available, or do not explicitly obligate the Company to furnish an updated release that is Year 2000 compliant. Early in 1997, the Company began a program to test its active software products (including upgrades, where applicable) and assess their status relative to Year 2000 compliance. Based on the results of this testing, the Company has been releasing new versions of many of its software products that have been designed and tested for performance of the functionality described in their applicable specifications up to and through the Year 2000. It also has been communicating with its software product clients regarding Year 2000 compliance of its products, and notifying the clients of the status of their software and of the availability of updated Year 2000 compliant releases for certain older software known to the Company to be still in use by that client. The Company has already communicated such information to nearly all of its product clients and is undertaking to contact the remaining clients. The Company also has been reviewing various custom software contracts to identify and resolve any potential Year 2000 problems with its custom software clients. The Company expects to continue the ongoing processes of monitoring the status of Year 2000 compliance of the Company-developed software in use by various clients. The Company has generally avoided, and continues to avoid, accepting contractual liability for failures of third-party software. Accordingly, the Company does not anticipate any material Year 2000 risk in connection with such third-party products. Nevertheless, in order to avoid any disruptions in connection with third-party products, the Company is seeking Year 2000 certification from third-party vendors to the extent the Company uses, or recommends the use of, third party products in its own customer products. In the Company's judgment, the most reasonably likely worst case scenarios in connection with the Year 2000 are possible delays in current business and reductions in the availability of new business during the second half of 1999; and the costs of resolving potential Year 2000 lawsuits by the Company's clients. The potential reductions in business may arise as some current and prospective clients encounter Year 2000 failures of their non-AMS information technology systems and/or institute "code freezes" under which no new information technology development projects will be authorized until after the Year 2000 changeover. Based on the Company's existing commitments through the Year 2000, the Company does not expect to be affected materially by any such information technology failures or "code freezes." Additionally, although the ultimate outcome of any possible Year 2000 litigation is uncertain, the Company does not believe that the ultimate aggregate amount of liability, if any, from any such client litigation would have a material effect on the Company. 14 17 Total costs of assessing the Year 2000 compliance of client systems and of communicating with clients about the Year 2000, which costs will be expensed as they are incurred, are estimated to be approximately $1.5 million for 1999, and $0.8 million for 2000. For the past three years, $5.6 million has been expended by the Company on Year 2000 compliance in respect of client systems in order to expedite development of Year 2000 compliant upgrades for noncompliant systems, to notify clients of the Year 2000 compliance of their AMS products and to staff Year 2000 compliance efforts. The majority of the embedded systems on which the Company relies in its day to day operations are owned and managed by the lessors of the buildings in which the Company's offices are located, or by agents of such lessors. The Company has sent letters to its lessors and, as applicable, their agents requesting certifications of the Year 2000 compliance of the embedded systems. The Company has received responses from a substantial majority of its lessors indicating that the systems in the buildings either already are, or are expected to be before the end of 1999, Year 2000 compliant. The Company will prioritize systems and develop necessary test plans based on the further responses it continues to receive, or not to receive, to its letters. NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In June 1998, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS No. 133 entitled "Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities." This Statement requires that an entity recognize all derivatives as either assets or liabilities in the statement of financial position and measure those instruments at fair value. The FASB has delayed its effective date for one year to fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2000. The Company will be required to adopt this new accounting standard by January 1, 2001. The Company does not anticipate early adoption of this new standard. Due to the complexity of this new standard, the Company has not completed an assessment of the impact it will have on its financial position or results of operations. The Company currently has no material derivative transactions, which would be impacted by this new standard. 15 18 ASSUMPTIONS UNDERLYING CERTAIN FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS AND FACTORS THAT MAY AFFECT FUTURE RESULTS In the next couple of years, the Company expects its managed growth in revenues to be approximately comparable to that realized for 1998. The continuing controlled growth in revenues should enable the Company to improve its profit margins. Cancellations of two major projects and related attrition rates which were higher than historical rates for the Company, heavy investment in building up staff capacity and infrastructure, and the stress of absorbing many new professional staff, contributed to those reduced margins in 1996 and 1997. The Company faces continuing risks in the area of project delivery and staffing. AMS has established a reputation in the marketplace of being a firm which delivers on time and in accordance with specifications regardless of the complexity of the application and the technology. The Company's customers often have a great deal at stake in being able to meet market and regulatory demands, and demand very ambitious delivery requirements. In order to meet its contractual commitments, AMS must continue to recruit, train, and assimilate successfully large numbers of entry-level and experienced employees annually, as well as to provide sufficient senior managerial experience on engagements, especially on large, complex projects. Moreover, this staff must be re-deployed on projects globally. Staffing projects in certain less industrialized countries can pose special risks and challenges. The Company must also manage rates of attrition, in view of increased competition for its talent. There is also the risk of successfully managing large projects and the risk of a material impact on results because of the unanticipated delay, suspension, renegotiation or cancellation of a large project. As was the case in 1996-1997 when cancellations of two major projects occurred, and the second quarter of 1999 when disputes with Bezeq proved difficult to resolve, any such development in a project could result in a decline in revenues or profits, the need to relocate staff, a potential lawsuit or other dispute with a client regarding money owed, or damages incurred as a result of alleged non-performance by AMS and a diminution of AMS's reputation. These risks are magnified in the largest projects and markets simply because of their size. The Company's business is characterized by large contracts producing high percentages of the Company's revenues. For example, 35% of the Company's total revenues in 1998 were derived from business with 17 clients. Changing client requirements, such as scope changes and process issues, and delays in client acceptance of interim project deliverables, are other examples of risks of performing, especially in large complex projects. These risks presently are perhaps the most significant for the Company, in the context of two significant projects, one involving substantial research and development expenditures (Tapestry); and the other, the Bezeq project described above. These risks are greater in certain geographic markets where such projects are less common, for example outside Europe and the United States. The Company could also face delays by clients, or client suspensions or cancellation of projects, because of client systems' failures to be Year 2000 compliant. Many companies are expected to impose freezes on changes in code programming after a specified date in 1999 in order to ensure their systems' Year 2000 compliance by the end of the year 1999. Any such actions, if taken by clients of the Company, could result in diversion of work, both pending and new opportunities, and decreases in revenues and profit margins. Although these risks exist potentially across the Company's engagements, they may be magnified in certain target markets, such as the Financial Services Institutions market, given 16 19 the need for Year 2000 compliance certainty in those markets. See "YEAR 2000 ISSUES" section in MD&A for additional information on Year 2000 compliance issues. There is also the risk of revenues not being realized when expected, such as in certain contracts in the State and Local Governments and Education market. On certain large contracts, the Company's fees are paid out of the benefits (for example, increased revenues from tax collections) that the client achieves. The Company typically defers recognition of such revenues until management can predict, with reasonable certainty, that the benefit stream will generate amounts sufficient to fund the contract. From that point forward revenues are recognized on a percentage of completion basis. The Company also faces the risk of increased competition in the markets in which it participates. In addition to any risk that the Company's competitors may create, some of the Company's current or prospective clients may decide to perform projects with their in-house staff that the Company might otherwise have undertaken. Increased competition from industry rivals, as well as decisions by clients to outsource fewer projects, could have a negative impact on pricing, revenues and margins. Events such as unanticipated declines in revenues or profits could in turn result in immediate fluctuations in the trading price and volume of the Company's stock. Certain other risks, including, but not limited to, the Company's international scope of operations, are discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-Q. Increasingly, the Company conducts business in countries other than Western Europe and North America. Contracts being performed in such non-Western countries can have higher delivery risks for a variety of reasons. Because the Company operates in a rapidly changing and highly competitive market, additional risks not discussed in this Form 10-Q may emerge from time to time. The Company cannot predict such risks or assess the impact, if any, such risks may have on its business. Consequently, the Company's various forward-looking statements, made, or to be made, should not be relied upon as a prediction of actual results. 17 20 Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk The information required by this item is hereby incorporated by reference to the Company's annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 26, 1999. There have been no material changes in the Company's market risk from that disclosed in the Company's 1998 Form 10-K. PART II OTHER INFORMATION Item 1. Legal Proceedings As previously described in the Company's Form 10-Q filed May 17, 1999, the State of Mississippi has sued AMS alleging claims for breach of contract, bad faith breach of contract, and unjust enrichment, and seeks various forms of injunctive relief as well as compensatory damages of approximately $234 million and punitive damages of approximately $750 million. The lawsuit arose in conjunction with the cancellation by the State of a contract with AMS for the development of a revenue management system to be used by the Mississippi State Tax Commission and was filed against AMS soon before the State was to go live in April 1999. AMS filed an answer and counterclaim on May 24, 1999. Discovery is underway and is expected to be completed by the second quarter of 2000. AMS intends to continue to contest the lawsuit vigorously. Item 2. Changes in Securities NONE. Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities NONE. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders (a) The regular annual meeting of stockholders of the Company was held in Fairfax, Virginia on May 21, 1999 for the purposes of electing the board of directors. (b) Proxies for the meeting were solicited pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the regulations promulgated thereunder, and there was no solicitation in opposition to management's solicitations. All of management's nominees for director were elected. 18 21 (c) Three proposals were submitted to a vote of stockholders as follows: 1. The stockholders approved the election of the following persons as directors of the Company:
Name For Withheld ---- --- -------- Daniel J. Altobello 35,655,027 81,198 Paul A. Brands 35,629,366 106,859 James J. Forese 35,655,140 81,085 Patrick W. Gross 35,656,510 79,715 Dorothy Leonard 35,655,493 80,605 W. Walker Lewis 35,655,284 80,941 Frederic V. Malek 35,643,856 92,369 Frank A. Nicolai 35,537,001 199,224 Alan G. Spoon 35,653,575 82,650
2. The stockholders approved with 28,288,006 affirmative votes, 7,408,957 negative votes, 39,262 abstinentions, and zero broker non-votes the Amendment to the Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation increasing the authorized number of shares of Common Stock to 200,000,000, we report that there were 42,514,408 common shares issued and outstanding all of which were entitled to vote with respect to such matter. 3. The stockholders approved with 32,576,302 affirmative votes, 3,066,716 negative votes, 93,207 abstentions, and zero broker non-votes an Amended 1996 Amended Stock Option Plan F, we report that 35,736,225 of the common shares were present and entitled to vote with respect to such matter. Item 5. Other Information NONE Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K (a) Exhibits 3. Articles of Incorporation and By-laws 3.1 Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed on April 1, 1996). 3.2 Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on August 4, 1998). 3.3 By-Laws of the Company, as amended and restated February 27, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 19 22 3.4 Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certficate of Incorporation of the Company (filed herewith). 4. Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders 4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1997). 4.2 Rights Agreement dated as of July 31, 1998, between the Company and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services L.L.C. as Rights Agent (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 8-A filed on August 4, 1998, including form of Rights Certificate). 10. Material Contracts 10.1 1996 Amended Stock Option Plan F (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit A to the Company's definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 11, 1997). 10.2 Outside Directors Stock-for-Fees Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit C to the Company's definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 10, 1996). 10.3 1992 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan E, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit B to the Company's definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 17, 1995). 10.4 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended September 1, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.5 Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan, effective January 1, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.6 Multi-Currency Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of January 9, 1998 among the Company, certain of the Company's subsidiaries, the Lenders named therein, and NationsBank N.A. as administrative agent and Wachovia Bank N.A., as documentation agent (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.7 Agreement of Lease between Joshua Realty Corporation and the Company, dated August 10, 1992, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.8 Office Lease Agreement between Hyatt Plaza Limited Partnership and the Company, dated August 12, 1993, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.9 Lease Agreement between Fairfax Gilbane, L.P. and the Company, dated February 15, 1994, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.10 Deed of Lease between Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company and the Company, dated December 1996 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 20 23 10.11 1996 Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers. 13. 1998 Financial Report 27. Financial Data Schedule (b) Reports on Form 8-K NONE. 21 24 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED Date: August 13, 1999 /s/ Paul A. Brands ------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Paul A. Brands, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Date: August 13, 1999 /s/ Ronald L. Schillereff ------------------- ---------------------------------------------------- Ronald L. Schillereff, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Executive Vice President 22 25 EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number Description - ------ ----------- 3.1 Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company * (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's 1995 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on April 1, 1996). 3.2 Certificate of Designation of Series A Junior Participating * Preferred Stock (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company's Registration Statement on Form 8-A filed on August 4, 1998). 3.3 By-laws of the Company, as amended and restated February * 27, 1998 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 3.4 Certificate of Amendment of Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company. 4.1 Specimen Common Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by * reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter ended March 31, 1997). 4.2 Rights Agreement dated as of July 31, 1998, between the Company * and ChaseMellon Shareholder Services L.L.C. as Rights Agent (incorporated herein by reference to the Company's Form 8-A filed on August 4, 1998, including form of Rights Certificate). 10.1 1996 Amended Stock Option Plan F (incorporated herein by * reference to Exhibit A to the Company's definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 11, 1997). 10.2 Outside Directors Stock-for-Fees Plan (incorporated herein by * reference to Exhibit C to the Company's definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 10, 1996). 10.3 1992 Amended and Restated Stock Option Plan E, as amended * (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit B to the Company's definitive Proxy Statement filed on April 17, 1995). 10.4 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, as amended * September 1, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.5 Outside Director Deferred Compensation Plan, effective * January 1, 1997 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K).
23 26 EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit Number Description - ------ ----------- 10.6 Multi-Currency Revolving Credit Agreement dated as of * January 9, 1998 among the Company, certain of the Company's subsidiaries, the Lenders named therein, and NationsBank N.A. as administrative agent and Wachovia Bank N.A., as Documentation agent. (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.7 Agreement of Lease between Joshua Realty Corporation and the * Company, dated August 10, 1992, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.8 Office Lease Agreement between Hyatt Plaza Limited Partnership * and the Company, dated August 12, 1993, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.9 Lease Agreement between Fairfax Gilbane, L.P. and the Company, * dated February 15, 1994, as amended (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.10 Deed of Lease between Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company * and the Company, dated December 1996 (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company's 1997 Annual Report on Form 10-K). 10.11 1996 Incentive Compensation Plan for Executive Officers * 13. 1998 Financial Report * 27. Financial Data Schedule
- ----------------------- *Previously filed. 24 EX-3.4 2 CERT. OF AMENDMENT OF CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION 1 EXHIBIT 3.4 CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT OF SECOND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION OF AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED Pursuant to Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED, a corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the "Corporation"), does hereby certify: FIRST: That at a meeting of the Board of Directors of the Corporation a resolution was duly adopted setting forth a proposed amendment to the Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company and declaring said amendment to be advisable. The resolution setting forth the proposed amendment is as follows: RESOLVED, that the first sentence of Section 1 of Article FOURTH of the Second Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation is hereby deleted in its entirety and replaced with the following (the "Amendment"), subject to approval by the shareholders of the Corporation at the next annual meeting of the shareholders of the Corporation scheduled for May 21, 1999 (the "Annual Meeting"); such Amendment to become effective upon the filing of the same with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware: Section 1. Authorized Shares. The total authorized capital stock of the Corporation shall be 204,000,000 shares, consisting of 4,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $.10 per share (herein called the "Preferred Stock"), and 200,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share (herein called the "Common Stock"). SECOND: That thereafter, pursuant to AMS's Bylaws and pursuant to resolution of its Board of Directors, the annual meeting of shareholders of AMS was duly called and held, upon notice in accordance with Section 222 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware, at which meeting a majority of the shareholders entitled to vote thereon voted in favor of the amendment. THIRD: That said amendment was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Section 242 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware. 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, AMERICAN MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, INCORPORATED has caused this Certificate to be signed by Paul A. Brands, its Chief Executive Officer, and Frank A. Nicolai, its Secretary, on this 20th day of July, 1999. By: /s/ PAUL A. BRANDS --------------------------- Paul A. Brands Chief Executive Officer Attested by: By: /s/ FRANK A. NICOLAI --------------------------- Frank A. Nicolai Secretary EX-27 3 FINANCIAL DATA SCHEDULE
5 THIS SCHEDULE CONTAINS SUMMARY FINANCIAL INFORMATION EXTRACTED FROM THE JUNE 30, 1999 FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REFERENCE TO SUCH FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. 6-MOS DEC-31-1999 JUN-30-1999 115,000 0 256,600 9,800 0 382,100 94,800 64,000 548,100 169,900 0 0 0 500 311,800 548,100 596,200 596,200 318,800 559,100 2,500 3,800 100 34,600 14,200 20,400 0 0 0 20,400 0.48 0.47
-----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----