10-Q

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008

OR

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission File Number 0-511

COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its Charter)

DELAWARE	36-2479991
(State of Incorporation)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6500 WEST CORTLAND STREET CHICAGO, ILLINOIS	60707
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (773) 889-8870

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     YES  x    NO  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer  ¨	Accelerated filer  ¨
Non-accelerated filer  ¨	Smaller reporting company  x
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    YES  ¨    NO  x

Number of shares of Common Stock of Registrant outstanding as of November 10, 2008: 6,471,280

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page No.
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1	Financial Statements	3
Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	15
Item 3	Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk	28
Item 4	Controls and Procedures	28
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A	Risk Factors	29
Item 6	Exhibits	29
SIGNATURE		30

2

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations—Unaudited

(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net sales	$	33,242		$	39,283		$	96,418		$	110,534
Cost of sales		23,538			29,550			66,358			84,333
Gross profit		9,704			9,733			30,060			26,201
Selling, general and administrative expense		8,911			9,716			26,002			28,384
Earnings (loss) from operations		793			17			4,058			(2,183	)
Interest expense		(231	)		(419	)		(775	)		(1,149	)
Other (expense) income		(135	)		212			(441	)		827
Earnings (loss) before income taxes		427			(190	)		2,842			(2,505	)
Tax provision (benefit)		285			(596	)		895			(1,768	)
Minority interest		—			(2	)		(14	)		(13	)
Net earnings (loss)	$	142		$	404		$	1,933		$	(750	)
Net earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	0.02		$	0.06		$	0.30		$	(0.12	)
Diluted	$	0.02		$	0.06		$	0.30		$	(0.12	)
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic		6,471			6,469			6,471			6,454
Diluted		6,471			6,576			6,471			6,454
Dividends declared per common share	$	—		$	—		$	0.16		$	0.16

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

3

Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets—Unaudited

(In Thousands)

	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash	$	3,552		$	1,860
Receivables, net of allowance for claims and doubtful accounts of $185 in 2008 and $205 in 2007		22,775			26,804
Inventories, primarily finished goods, net		29,568			33,054
Deferred income taxes		8,710			8,715
Prepaid assets		1,530			1,568
Other current assets		1,127			3,338
Total current assets		67,262			75,339
Property, plant and equipment, at cost:
Buildings and improvements		5,717			5,442
Tooling and equipment		21,509			21,554
		27,226			26,996
Accumulated depreciation		(21,653	)		(20,423	)
Land		230			230
Property, plant and equipment, net		5,803			6,803
Other assets:
Cash surrender value of officers’ life insurance policies		3,795			4,280
Goodwill		20,084			11,997
Intangible assets		13,445			15,559
Other assets		533			340
Total other assets		37,857			32,176
Total assets	$	110,922		$	114,318

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

4

Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets—Unaudited

(In Thousands, Except Share Data)

	September 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	1,240		$	1,240
Accounts payable		4,739			7,273
Payable to former PPL shareholders		8,424			—
Accrued salaries and commissions		1,096			847
Accrued advertising and sales promotion costs		1,700			2,093
Accrued product warranty costs		921			3,440
Accrued income taxes		982			266
Deferred income taxes		17			—
Other accrued liabilities		3,176			4,505
Total current liabilities		22,295			19,664
Non-current liabilities:
Long-term bank debt, net of current maturities		13,000			18,745
Deferred compensation		6,809			6,320
Deferred income taxes		2,630			3,772
Other long-term liabilities		1,039			679
Total non-current liabilities		23,478			29,516
Total liabilities		45,773			49,180
Commitments and contingencies		—			—
Minority interest		34			23
Shareholders’ equity:
Preferred stock, $1 par value, 1,000,000 shares authorized - none issued		—			—
Common stock, $.33 1/3 par value, 12,000,000 shares authorized - 7,039,100 issued for 2008 and 2007		2,345			2,345
Paid-in capital		20,294			20,101
Retained earnings		47,077			46,179
Accumulated comprehensive income		(764	)		327
		68,952			68,952
Treasury stock, at cost (567,820 shares for 2008 and 2007)		(3,837	)		(3,837	)
Total shareholders’ equity		65,115			65,115
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	110,922		$	114,318

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

5

Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows—Unaudited

(In Thousands)

	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net earnings (loss)	$	1,933		$	(750	)
Adjustments to reconcile net earnings (loss) to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		4,269			5,248
Product software Impairment		266			—
Deferred income taxes		(1,120	)		(236	)
Loss (gain) on cash surrender value (CSV) life insurance		780			(193	)
Stock-based compensation		194			158
Tax benefit from stock options exercised		—			19
Minority interest		14			13
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Receivables		4,029			7,255
Inventories		3,486			(7,947	)
Other current assets		1,541			(2,483	)
Accounts payable		(2,534	)		2,318
Accrued income taxes		716			(1,276	)
Accrued liabilities		(3,992	)		(1,040	)
Deferred compensation		489			481
Deferred income		(275	)		(616	)
Other long-term liabilities		360			(115	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		10,156			836
Cash flows from investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(642	)		(1,272	)
Premiums on CSV life insurance		(295	)		(295	)
Intangible assets		154			(1,759	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(783	)		(3,326	)
Cash flows from financing activities:
Bank borrowings		(5,745	)		3,022
Transactions related to exercise of stock options, net		—			112
Dividends paid		(1,035	)		(1,031	)
Other		(1	)		23
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities		(6,781	)		2,126
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(900	)		(22	)
Net increase in cash		1,692			(386	)
Cash at beginning of period		1,860			1,878
Cash at end of period	$	3,552		$	1,492
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	791		$	1,220
Income taxes, net of refunds	$	(780	)	$	1,771

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

Cobra Electronics Corporation and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007

(Unaudited)

The consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared by Cobra Electronics Corporation (the “Company”), without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading. The Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2007 has been derived from the audited consolidated balance sheet as of that date. These consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Company’s latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. In the opinion of management, the information contained herein reflects all adjustments necessary to make the results of operations for the interim periods a fair statement of such operations. Due to the seasonality of the Company’s business, the results of operations of any interim period are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for a fiscal year.

(1) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Business — The Company is a leading designer and marketer of two-way mobile communication products under the COBRA^® brand name in the United States, Canada and Europe, holding the number one or strong number two position in each of its longstanding product lines and targeting a similar position for marine VHF radios and power inverters. The Company’s UK-based subsidiary, Performance Products Limited is a designer and marketer of consumer electronics principally in the United Kingdom and elsewhere in Europe, including GPS-enabled speed camera detection systems and satellite navigation devices under the SNOOPER^® brand name and also markets a database of speed camera locations. A majority of the Company’s products are purchased from overseas suppliers, primarily in China, Hong Kong and South Korea. The consumer electronics market is characterized by rapidly changing technology and certain products may have limited life cycles. Management believes that it maintains strong relationships with its current suppliers and that, if necessary, other suppliers could be found. The extent to which a change in a supplier would have an adverse effect on the Company’s business depends on the timing of the change, the product or products that the supplier produces for the Company and the volume of that production. The Company also maintains insurance coverage that would, in certain limited circumstances, reimburse the Company for lost profits resulting from a supplier’s inability to fulfill its commitments to the Company.

Principles of Consolidation — The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. The consolidated financial statements also include a variable interest entity (“VIE”) of which PPL is the primary beneficiary. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the consolidated entities are collectively referred to as the “Company”. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company operates in two business segments, Cobra Consumer Electronics (“Cobra”) and Performance Products Limited (“PPL”); refer to Note 3 Segment Information for more detail.

(2) NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

SFAS No. 141R – Business Combinations: In December 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 141R (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”) to change how an entity accounts for the acquisition of a business. When effective, SFAS 141R will replace existing SFAS 141 in its entirety. SFAS 141R carries forward the existing requirements to account for all business combinations using the acquisition method (formerly called the purchase method). In general, SFAS 141R will require acquisition-date fair value measurement of identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and non-controlling interests in the acquiree. SFAS 141R will eliminate the current cost-based purchase method under SFAS 141.

7

The new measurement requirements will result in the recognition of the full amount of acquisition-date goodwill, which includes amounts attributable to non-controlling interests. The acquirer will recognize in income any gain or loss on the remeasurement to acquisition-date fair value of consideration transferred or of previously acquired equity interests in the acquiree. Neither the direct costs incurred to effect a business combination nor the costs the acquirer expects to incur under a plan to restructure an acquired business will be included as part of the business combination accounting. As a result, those costs will be charged to expense when incurred, except for debt or equity issuance costs, which will be accounted for in accordance with other generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS 141R will also change the accounting for contingent consideration, in process research and development, contingencies, and restructuring costs. In addition, changes in deferred tax asset valuation allowances and acquired income tax uncertainties in a business combination that occur after the measurement period will impact income taxes under SFAS 141R.

SFAS 141R is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company intends to adopt SFAS 141R effective January 1, 2009 and apply its provisions prospectively. The Company currently does not believe that the adoption of SFAS 141R will have a significant effect on its financial statements; however, the effect is dependent upon whether the Company makes any future acquisitions and the specifics of those acquisitions.

SFAS 141R amends the goodwill impairment test requirements in SFAS 142. For a goodwill impairment test as of a date after the effective date of SFAS 141R, the value of the reporting unit and the amount of implied goodwill, calculated in the second step of the test, will be determined in accordance with the measurement and recognition guidance on accounting for business combinations under Statement 141R. This change could effect the determination of what amount, if any, should be recognized as an impairment loss for goodwill recorded before the effective date of Statement 141R. This accounting will be required when Statement 141R becomes effective (January 1, 2009 for the Company) and applies to goodwill related to acquisitions accounted for originally under SFAS 141 as well as those accounted for under SFAS 141R. The Company has not determined what effect, if any, SFAS 141R will have on the results of its impairment testing subsequent to December 31, 2008.

On January 1, 2008, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (“SFAS 157”) as it relates to financial assets and liabilities. In February 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) No. FAS 157-2, Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 157, which delayed the effective date of SFAS 157 for all nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except those that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on at least an annual basis, until January 1, 2009 for calendar year-end entities. Also in February 2008, the FASB issued FSP No. FAS 157-1, Application of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or Measurement Under Statement 13, which states that SFAS No. 13, Accounting for Leases (“SFAS 13”) and other accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of lease classification or measurement under SFAS 13 are excluded from the provisions of SFAS 157, except for assets and liabilities related to leases assumed in a business combination that are required to be measured at fair value under SFAS No. 141, Business Combinations (“SFAS 141”) or SFAS No. 141 (revised 2007), Business Combinations (“SFAS 141R”).

SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The provisions of this standard apply to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and are to be applied prospectively with limited exceptions. The adoption of SFAS 157, as it relates to financial assets, had no impact on the financial statements. Management is currently evaluating the potential impact of SFAS 157, as it relates to nonfinancial assets and liabilities, on the financial statements.

8

SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or pay to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. This standard is now the single source in GAAP for the definition of fair value, except for the fair value of leased property as defined in SFAS 13. SFAS 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions developed based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy under SFAS 157 are described below:

• Level 1 – Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

• Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, including quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates); and inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

• Level 3 – Inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

As of September 30, 2008, the Company had a derivative contract for an interest swap and a foreign exchange contract that were valued using quoted market prices. These financial instruments are exchange-traded and are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because the exchange is not deemed to be an active market. The derivative was classified as a long-term liability on the balance sheet. As of September 30, 2008, the fair value of the interest rate swap was $184,000 and the fair value of the foreign exchange contract was $84,000.

SFAS No. 160 – Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements: In December 2007, the FASB issued Financial Accounting Standard No. 160 Non-Controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements (“SFAS 160”) an amendment of ARB No. 51. SFAS 160 changes the accounting for, and the financial statement presentation of, non-controlling equity interests in a consolidated subsidiary. SFAS 160 replaces the existing minority-interest provisions of Accounting Research Bulletin (ARB) 51, Consolidated Financial Statements, by defining a new term non-controlling interests to replace what were previously called minority interests. The new standard establishes non-controlling interests as a component of the equity of a consolidated entity.

The underlying principle of the new standard is that both the controlling interest and the non-controlling interests are part of the equity of a single economic entity: the consolidated reporting entity. Classifying non-controlling interests as a component of consolidated equity is a change from the current practice of treating minority interests as a mezzanine item between liabilities and equity or as a liability. The change affects both the accounting and financial reporting for non-controlling interests in a consolidated subsidiary. SFAS 160 includes reporting requirements intended to clearly identify and differentiate the interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling owners. The reporting requirements are required to be applied retrospectively.

SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company intends to adopt SFAS 160 effective January 1, 2009 and apply its provisions prospectively. The Company will also present comparative financial statements that reflect the retrospective application of the disclosure and presentation provisions when it applies the requirements of SFAS 160. The Company currently does not believe that the adoption of SFAS 160 will have a material effect on its financial statements.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – and amendment of FASB Statement No. 133, (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, including (i) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (ii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS 133, and (iii) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. This standard becomes effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. Earlier adoption of SFAS 161, and separately, comparative disclosures for earlier periods at initial adoption are encouraged. As SFAS 161 only requires enhanced disclosures, this standard will have no impact on the financial statements.

In April 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. FAS 142-3, Determination of the Useful Life of Intangible Assets (“FSP No. FAS 142-3”). FSP No. FAS 142-3 requires companies estimating the useful life of a recognized intangible asset to consider their historical experience in renewing or extending similar arrangements or, in the absence of historical experience, to consider assumptions that market participants would use about renewal or extension as adjusted for SFAS No. 142’s, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, entity-specific factors. FSP No. FAS 142-3 will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is currently evaluating the potential impact of adoption of FSP No. FAS 142-3 on its consolidated financial statements. However, the Company does not expect the adoption of FSP No. FAS 142-3 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

9

In May 2008, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” SFAS No. 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles used in the preparation of financial statements that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. SFAS No. 162 becomes effective 60 days following the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU Section 411, “The Meaning of Present Fairly in Conformity With Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.” The Company does not expect that the adoption of SFAS No. 162 to have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.

(3) ACQUISITION OF PERFORMANCE PRODUCTS LIMITED – GOODWILL

In connection with the acquisition of Performance Products Limited (“PPL”) in October 2006, the Company recorded goodwill of $12 million. Pursuant to the purchase agreement, a final earn-out payment of $ 8.5 million was recorded as a payable and Goodwill in September 2008. The $8.5 was paid to the former shareholders of PPL on October 20, 2008. A roll-forward of the goodwill balance follows (in thousands):

Balance at January 1, 2008	$	11,997
Final earn-out payment		8,464
Translation		(377	)
Balance at September 30, 2008	$	20,084

10

(4) SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company operates in two business segments (1) Cobra Consumer Electronics (“Cobra”) and (2) Performance Products Limited (“PPL”). The Cobra segment is comprised of Cobra Electronics Corporation, Cobra Hong Kong Limited (“CHK”) and Cobra Electronics Europe Limited (“CEEL”). The PPL segment includes Cobra Electronics U.K. Limited (“CEUK”) and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Performance Products Limited. The Company has separate sales departments and distribution channels for each segment, which provide segment-exclusive product lines to all customers for that segment. Currently, intersegment sales are not material.

The tabular presentation below summarizes the financial information by business segment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.

	Third Quarter - 2008 vs. 2007
	2008									2007
	COBRA			PPL			TOTAL			COBRA			PPL			TOTAL
	(in thousands)
Net sales	$	30,778		$	2,464		$	33,242		$	35,695		$	3,588		$	39,283
Cost of sales		22,375			1,163			23,538			27,418			2,132			29,550
Gross profit		8,403			1,301			9,704			8,277			1,456			9,733
Selling, general and administrative expense		7,586			1,325			8,911			8,317			1,399			9,716
Earnings (loss) from operations		817			(24	)		793			(40	)		57			17
Interest expense		(231	)		—			(231	)		(417	)		(2	)		(419	)
Other (expense) income		(328	)		193			(135	)		48			164			212
Income (loss) before income taxes		258			169			427			(409	)		219			(190	)
Tax expense (benefit)		268			17			285			(234	)		(362	)		(596	)
Minority interest		—			—			—			—			(2	)		(2	)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(10	)	$	152		$	142		$	(175	)	$	579		$	404
	Nine Months - September 30, 2008 vs. September 30, 2007
	2008									2007
	COBRA			PPL			TOTAL			COBRA			PPL			TOTAL
	(in thousands)
Net sales	$	84,286		$	12,132		$	96,418		$	100,080		$	10,454		$	110,534
Cost of sales		60,693			5,665			66,358			78,147			6,186			84,333
Gross profit		23,593			6,467			30,060			21,933			4,268			26,201
Selling, general and administrative expense		21,981			4,021			26,002			24,287			4,097			28,384
Earnings (loss) from operations		1,612			2,446			4,058			(2,354	)		171			(2,183	)
Interest expense		(775	)		—			(775	)		(1,113	)		(36	)		(1,149	)
Other (expense) income		(774	)		333			(441	)		533			294			827
Income (loss) before income taxes		63			2,779			2,842			(2,934	)		429			(2,505	)
Tax expense (benefit)		326			569			895			(1,472	)		(296	)		(1,768	)
Minority interest		—			(14	)		(14	)		—			(13	)		(13	)
Net (loss) earnings	$	(263	)	$	2,196		$	1,933		$	(1,462	)	$	712		$	(750	)

There have been no differences in the basis of segmentation or the basis of measurement.

(5) MOBILE NAVIGATION STRATEGY CHANGE

The Company’s decision to change its North American mobile navigation strategy resulted in a $7.7 million charge in the fourth quarter of 2007. This strategy change limits the future development of mass market mobile navigation products in North America to unique mobile navigation products sold into niche markets with specialized and focused distribution and employs lower cost sourcing arrangements utilizing the platform of Performance Products Limited or that of other qualified vendors. In the second quarter of 2008, the Company incurred a $266,000 product software impairment charge because lower selling prices were anticipated for the remaining mobile navigation units on-hand. The mobile navigation strategy change reserve totaled $326,000 at September 30, 2008 and the Company does not expect future costs to exceed the current reserve balance.

11

(6) FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS

On February 15, 2008, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “LSA”) with The PrivateBank and Trust Company, as lender and agent, and RBS Citizens, N.A., as lender, for a $5.7 million term loan facility and a $40 million revolving credit facility, both of which mature on October 19, 2011. At September 30, 2008, the Company had interest-bearing debt outstanding of $14.2 million, consisting of the $4.8 million term loan and $9.4 million on the revolver.

Interest under the LSA is calculated based on the base rate (Prime or the Federal Funds Rate plus 0.5% per annum) or LIBOR, at the Company’s option, plus an applicable margin. The margin, which is currently -0.50% for the base rate loan and 1.00% for LIBOR loans, is determined based on the Company’s total debt to EBITDA ratio tested quarterly, commencing as of June 30, 2008. The revolving credit facility under the LSA is also subject to an unused line fee of 0.25%. Borrowings under the LSA are secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company except for equity interests in non-US subsidiaries. The Company entered into an interest rate swap which fixed the interest rate on the term loan at 5.34% plus the applicable margin. The weighted average interest rate for the first nine months of 2008 was 5.98%.

Availability under the revolver is calculated based on a borrowing base formula including 75% of eligible accounts receivable, 60% of eligible inventory and 60% of open trade letters of credit, but it can be subject to reserves at the lenders’ discretion. Excess availability must be at least $3 million at all times.

The LSA contains certain financial and other covenants including a fixed charge coverage ratio and a debt to EBITDA ratio. The term loan is subject to quarterly installment payments and mandatory prepayments based on certain asset sales and issuance of equity or debt.

(7) EARNINGS/LOSS PER SHARE

	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008		2007			2008		2007
	(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
Basic earnings (loss) per share:
Net earnings (loss) available to common shareholders	$	142	$	404		$	1,933	$	(750	)
Weighted-average shares outstanding		6,471,280		6,469,118			6,471,280		6,453,784
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	0.02	$	0.06		$	0.30	$	(0.12	)
Diluted earnings (loss) per share:
Weighted-average shares outstanding		6,471,280		6,469,118			6,471,280		6,453,784
Dilutive shares issuable in connection with stock option plans (a)		—		461,546			—		—
Less: shares purchasable with option proceeds		—		(354,243	)		—		—
Total		6,471,280		6,576,421			6,471,280		6,453,784
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	0.02	$	0.06		$	0.30	$	(0.12	)

(a) Stock options to purchase 478,796 shares were not included in the calculation for dilutive loss per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2007, as the effect would have been antidilutive. Stock options to purchase shares for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008 were not included since the exercise price was above the market price.

12

(8) COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS/LOSS

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
	(In Thousands)
Net earnings (loss)	$	142		$	404		$	1,933		$	(750	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency translation adjustment (no tax effect)		(1,145	)		46			(841	)		142
Interest rate swap and foreign exchange (net of tax)		(301	)		(25	)		(250	)		(28	)
Total comprehensive (loss) earnings	$	(1,304	)	$	425		$	842		$	(636	)

(9) COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

The Company is subject to various unresolved legal actions, which arise in the normal course of its business. None of these matters are expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations. However, the ultimate resolution of these matters could result in a change in the Company’s estimate of its liability for these matters.

The Company warrants to the consumer who purchases its products that it will repair or replace, without charge, defective products within a specified time period, generally one year. The Company also has a return policy for its customers that allows customers to return to the Company products returned to them by their customers for full or partial credit based on when the Company’s customer last purchased these products. Consequently, it maintains a warranty reserve, which reflects historical warranty return rates by product category multiplied by the most recent six months of unit sales of that model and the unit standard cost of the model. A roll-forward of the warranty reserve follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008			Year Ended December 31, 2007
	(In Thousands)
Accrued product warranty costs, beginning of period	$	3,440		$	1,963
Warranty provision		2,247			4,304
Warranty expenditures		(4,766	)		(2,827	)
Accrued product warranty costs, end of period	$	921		$	3,440

The decrease in the accrued warranty reserve was mainly due to the mobile navigation warranty reserve, which declined to $132,000 at September 30, 2008 from $2.1 million at December 31, 2007 as a result of returns received during the first nine months of 2008 and substantially lower sales of mobile navigation products during this period.

At September 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company had outstanding inventory purchase orders with suppliers totaling approximately $22.1 million and $26.1 million, respectively. This decrease in purchase commitments reflects improved vendor performance, lower two-way radio demand and the mobile navigation strategy change.

13

(10) INVENTORY VALUATION RESERVES

The Company maintains a liquidation reserve representing the write-down of returned product from its customers to its net realizable value. Returned inventory is either sold to various liquidators or returned to vendors for partial credit against similar, new models. The decision to sell or return products to vendors depends upon the estimated future demand for the models. Judgments are made as to whether various models are to be liquidated or returned to the vendor, taking into consideration the liquidation prices expected to be received and the amount of the vendor credit. The amount of the reserve is determined by comparing the cost of each unit returned to the estimated amount to be realized upon each unit’s disposition, either from returning the unit to the vendor for partial credit towards the cost of new, similar product or liquidating the unit. This reserve can fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter depending upon quantities of returned inventory on hand and the estimated liquidation price or vendor credit per unit. A roll-forward of the liquidation reserve follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008			Year Ended December 31, 2007
	(In Thousands)
Liquidation reserve, beginning of period	$	2,695		$	1,112
Liquidation provision		3,716			7,339
Liquidation of models		(5,860	)		(5,756	)
Liquidation reserve, end of period	$	551		$	2,695

The decrease in the inventory liquidation reserve was mainly due to the mobile navigation reserve, which declined to $6,000 at September 30, 2008 from $1.9 million at December 31, 2007 as a result of the returns received during the first nine months of 2008 and substantially lower sales of mobile navigation products during this period.

The Company maintains a net realizable value (“NRV”) reserve to write-down, as necessary, certain finished goods, except for those goods covered by the previously discussed liquidation reserve, below cost. The reserve includes models where it is determined that the estimated realizable value is less than cost. Thus, judgments must be made about which slow-moving, excess or non-current models are to be included in the reserve and the NRV of such models. The estimated NRV of each model is the per unit price that is estimated to be received if the model were sold in the marketplace.

This reserve will vary depending upon the specific models selected, the estimated NRV for each model and quantities of each model that are determined will be sold below cost from quarter to quarter. A roll-forward of the NRV reserve follows:

	Nine Months Ended September 30, 2008			Year Ended December 31, 2007
	(In Thousands)
Net realizable reserve, beginning of period	$	1,614		$	736
NRV provision		660			4,121
NRV write-offs		(2,095	)		(3,243	)
Net realizable reserve, end of period	$	179		$	1,614

The decrease in the NRV reserve was mainly due to the mobile navigation reserve, which declined to $10,000 at September 30, 2008 from $1.3 million at December 31, 2007 because of sales of mobile navigation products in the first nine months of 2008 that had been fully reserved for at December 31, 2007.

(11) OTHER INCOME/EXPENSE

The following table shows the components of other income/expense:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2008			2007			2008			2007
	(In Thousands)
Interest income	$	11		$	10		$	56		$	25
CSV (loss) gain		(319	)		(27	)		(780	)		193
Exchange gain		20			254			134			412
Other - net		153			(25	)		149			197
	$	(135	)	$	212		$	(441	)	$	827

14

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

ANALYSIS OF RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Executive Summary—Third Quarter

Net earnings for the third quarter of 2008 totaled $142,000 or $.02 per share, compared to net earnings of $404,000 or $.06 per share for the third quarter of 2007. Key factors contributing to the lower net earnings were:

• Net sales declined $6.0 million, or 15.4%, due to lower sales of mobile navigation, as a result of the change in the Company’s North American mobile navigation strategy in the fourth quarter of 2007, as well as lower sales of two-way radios, Citizens Band radios and radar detectors in North America. A sales decline of $1.1 million at PPL also contributed to the overall revenue decline.

• Gross margins increased by 4.4 points to 29.2 points, nearly offsetting the decline in net sales and resulting in a decrease

in gross profit of $29,000.

• Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $805,000 or 8.3% due to the Company’s cost containment efforts, headcount reductions and lower professional fees.

• Operating income increased to $793,000 from $17,000 in the third quarter of 2007 as the efforts to contain selling, general and administrative expenses resulted in improved operating margins.

• Other expenses, including interest, increased by $159,000 primarily due to an increase in cash surrender value (“CSV”) expense for life insurance of $292,000, which was partially offset by $188,000 of lower interest expense because of reduced debt and a decline in interest rates.

The combined impact of the foregoing factors was a $617,000 improvement in income before taxes.

The effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2008 was 66.7% compared to 313.7% for the third quarter of 2007. The 66.7% effective tax rate for the third quarter of 2008 was due principally to the effect of non-deductible CSV expense of $319,000. The 313.7% effective rate for the tax benefit for the third quarter of 2007 was due to a reversal of the net operating loss (“NOL”) valuation allowance for CEEL and a tax benefit for PPL due to a pending decline in the corporate tax rate in the United Kingdom from 30% to 28% and the impact of this action on deferred taxes on the Company’s balance sheet.

15

Executive Summary—Nine Months

Net earnings for the first nine months of 2008 totaled $1.9 million or $.30 per share – an increase of $2.7 million or $.42 per share compared to the same period of 2007. Key factors contributing to the improved net earnings were:

• Net sales declined $14.1 million, or 12.8%, due to lower sales of mobile navigation, as a result of the change in the fourth quarter of 2007 of the Company’s North American mobile navigation strategy, as well as lower sales of two-way radios,

Citizens Band radios and radar detectors in North America. Partially offsetting these lower sales was a $1.7 million net

sales increase at PPL.

• Gross profit increased by $3.9 million despite the sales decline as gross margin rose 7.5 points to 31.2% because of higher margins on new models, lower airfreight and the change in the Company’s North American mobile navigation strategy.

• Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.4 million, or 8.4%, due to lower selling expense as a result of the decline in sales as well headcount reductions, lower professional fees and the Company’s overall cost containment efforts.

• Operating income increased $6.2 million to $4.1 million as the improvements in gross margins and efforts to contain selling, general and administrative expenses resulted in improved operating margins.

• Other expenses, including interest, increased by $894,000 mainly due to $780,000 of a CSV expense in 2008 compared to $193,000 of CSV income in 2007. This was partially offset by $374,000 of lower interest expense because of reduced debt

and a decline in the interest rate incurred.

The combined impact of the foregoing factors was $2.8 million of income before income taxes compared to a $2.5 million loss before income taxes for the first nine months of 2007.

The effective tax rate for the first nine months of 2008 was 31.5% compared to 70.6% for the same period a year ago. The 70.6% effective rate for the tax benefit for the nine-month period ending September 30, 2007 was due to a reversal of the NOL valuation allowance for CEEL and a tax benefit for PPL due to a pending decline in the corporate tax rate in the United Kingdom from 30% to 28% and the impact of this action on deferred taxes on the company’s balance sheet.

16

EBITDA

The following table shows the reconciliation of net income to EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined:

	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	(in thousands)
	2008			2007			2008			2007
Net income (loss)	$	142		$	404		$	1,933		$	(750	)
Depreciation/amortization		1,130			1,481			4,535			5,248
Interest expense		231			419			775			1,149
Income tax provision (benefit)		285			(596	)		895			(1,768	)
Minority interest		—			2			14			13
EBITDA		1,788			1,710			8,152			3,892
Stock option expense		65			67			194			158
CSV loss (gain)		319			27			780			(193	)
Other non-cash items		(217	)		986			(273	)		959
EBITDA As Defined	$	1,955		$	2,790		$	8,853		$	4,816

EBITDA represents earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization. EBITDA As Defined, represents EBITDA plus the applicable adjustments required to agree with the EBITDA measurement for compliance with the financial covenants of the Company’s lenders. The Company believes EBITDA is a useful performance indicator and is frequently used by management, securities analysts and investors to judge operating performance between time periods and among other companies. The Company uses EBITDA As Defined to assess operating performance and ensure compliance with financial covenants.

EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined are Non-GAAP performance indicators that should be used in conjunction with GAAP performance measurements such as net sales, operating profit and net income to evaluate the Company’s operating performance. EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined are not alternatives to net income or cash flow from operations determined in accordance with GAAP. Furthermore, EBITDA and EBITDA As Defined may not be comparable to the calculation of similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

17

Third Quarter 2008 Compared to Third Quarter 2007

The following table contains sales and pre-tax profit (loss) after eliminating intercompany accounts by business segment for the third quarter ending September 30, 2008 and 2007:

Business Segment	2008				2007					2008 vs. 2007 Increase (Decrease)
	(in thousands)
	Net Sales		Pre-tax Profit		Net Sales		Pre-tax (Loss) Profit			Net Sales			Pre-tax Profit
Cobra	$	30,778	$	258	$	35,695	$	(409	)	$	(4,917	)	$	667
PPL		2,464		169		3,588		219			(1,124	)		(50	)
Total Company	$	33,242	$	427	$	39,283	$	(190	)	$	(6,041	)	$	617

Cobra Business Segment

Cobra net sales decreased $4.9 million, or 13.8%, in the third quarter of 2008 to $30.8 million. During the fourth quarter of 2007, the Company announced a change in its mass market mobile navigation strategy in North America. As part of this change in strategy, all future development of mass marketed mobile navigation products ceased with future efforts limited to unique mobile navigation products sold into niche markets with specialized and focused distribution. When such products are launched, lower cost sourcing arrangements utilizing the PPL platform or that of other qualified vendors will be employed. Accordingly, $1.2 million of this decline was due to lower mobile navigation/GPS product net sales as a result of this change in strategy. The remaining $3.7 million decline was due to lower sales of two-way radios, Citizens Band radios and detectors in the United States due to weak store traffic and competitive pressures. The following table summarizes the net sales for the three-month periods ending September 30, 2008 and 2007:

	Mobile Navigation/ GPS Products Net Sales			Other Products Net Sales			Total Net Sales
	(in thousands)
2008	$	674		$	30,104		$	30,778
2007		1,897			33,798			35,695
Decrease	$	(1,223	)	$	(3,694	)	$	(4,917	)

18

Gross profit increased $126,000 in the third quarter of 2008 from the third quarter of 2007 to $8.4 million and the gross margin improved to 27.3% in the third quarter of 2008 from 23.2% in the third quarter of 2007. The gross margin improvement was due to increased gross margins on domestic two-way radios, detectors and Citizens Band radios, which benefited from sales of new, higher-margin models. Additionally, substantially lower air freight also contributed to the improvement in the two-way radio gross margin. Lastly, the gross margin in mobile navigation improved as prices for the most recent product, the NAV ONE™ 5000, remained stable through the third quarter of 2008. The following table summarizes the gross profit for the three-month periods ending September 30, 2008 and 2007:

	Mobile Navigation/ GPS Products Gross (Loss) Profit			Other Products Gross Profit			Total Gross Profit
	(in thousands)
2008 gross (loss) profit	$	(54	)	$	8,457		$	8,403
2007 gross (loss) profit		(941	)		9,218			8,277
Increase	$	887		$	(761	)	$	126
2008 gross margin		-8.0	%		28.1	%		27.3	%
2007 gross margin		-49.6	%		27.3	%		23.2	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $731,000, or 8.8%, to $7.6 million in the third quarter of 2008 from $8.3 million in the third quarter of 2007. The decrease was due to less variable selling expenses because of the lower sales as well as reduced professional fees and management’s efforts to reduce spending.

Other expense, including interest, increased $190,000 in the third quarter of 2008 as compared to the third quarter of 2007. This increase was mainly due to a $319,000 loss in 2008 on the cash surrender value of life insurance, owned by the Company for the purpose of funding deferred compensation programs for several current and former officers. The loss was generated as the investment vehicles in which the cash was invested declined in value in line with the overall financial markets. Partially offsetting the cash surrender value loss was a $186,000 decline in interest expense, primarily because of a reduced level of borrowings and lower interest rates.

As a result of the above, there was a pre-tax profit of $258,000 in the third quarter of 2008 compared to a pre-tax loss of $409,000 in third quarter of 2007.

19

Performance Products Limited (“PPL”) Business Segment

PPL’s net sales decreased $1.1 million, or 31.3%, to $2.5 million in the third quarter of 2008 from $3.6 million in the third quarter of 2007. This decrease was due to lower sales of personal navigation and GPS locator products in the United Kingdom and in part was due to the weakness in the United Kingdom economy.

Gross profit decreased $155,000 to $1.3 million in the third quarter of 2008 from $1.5 million in the third quarter of 2007. However, the gross margin improved to 52.8% in 2008 from 40.6% in 2007 as the higher-margin download fees of PPL’s proprietary Enigma data base—which provides accurate and comprehensive listings of fixed speed cameras, high accident zones and other hazards—accounted for a higher percentage of revenues in 2008.

Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $1.3 million for the third quarter of 2008 and were $74,000 or 5.3% lower than the third quarter of 2007. As a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses increased to 53.8% in 2008 from 39.0% in 2007 due to the lower level of sales in 2008 as compared to 2007.

As a result of the above, income before income taxes decreased to $169,000 in the third quarter of 2008 from $219,000 in the third quarter of 2007.

20

Nine Months 2008 Compared to Nine Months 2007

The following table contains sales and pre-tax profit (loss) after eliminating intercompany accounts by business segment for the nine-month periods ending September 30, 2008 and 2007.

	2008				2007					2008 vs. 2007 Increase (Decrease)
	(in thousands)
Business Segment	Net Sales		Pre-tax (Loss) Profit		Net Sales		Pre-tax (Loss) Profit			Net Sales			Pre-tax Profit
Cobra	$	84,286	$	63	$	100,080	$	(2,934	)	$	(15,794	)	$	2,997
PPL		12,132		2,779		10,454		429			1,678			2,350
Total Company	$	96,418	$	2,842	$	110,534	$	(2,505	)	$	(14,116	)	$	5,347

Cobra Business Segment

Cobra net sales decreased $15.8 million, or 15.8%, in 2008 to $84.3 million as compared to the first nine months of 2007. $5.9 million of the decline was due to lower mobile navigation sales as a result of the change in Cobra’s North American mass market mobile navigation strategy as previously discussed. The remaining $9.9 million decline was due primarily to lower sales of Citizens Band radios, detectors and two-way radios in the United States. Sales of Citizens Band radios declined as the weak economy and higher fuel prices reduced discretionary income of professional drivers, with strong sales of the new 29 LTD BT with Bluetooth^® wireless technology, introduced earlier in 2008, offsetting some of the decline. Lower detector sales resulted principally from weak store traffic and competitive pressures, which were offset, in part, by sales to a major account with which Cobra had not done business for several years. Two-way radio sales in the U.S. decreased because of a reduction in the number of skus at a major retailer, mostly driven by the continuing decline of this product category. However, some of this domestic decrease was offset by a large increase in sales to Cobra’s Canadian distributor because of increased placement. The following table summarizes the net sales for the nine-month periods ending September 30, 2008 and 2007:

	Mobile Navigation/ GPS Products Net Sales			Other Products Net Sales			Total Net Sales
	(in thousands)
2008	$	309		$	83,977		$	84,286
2007		6,165			93,915			100,080
Decrease	$	(5,856	)	$	(9,938	)	$	(15,794	)

21

Gross margin increased to 28.0% in the first nine months of 2008 from 21.9% in the first nine months of 2007, which resulted in an increase in gross profit of $1.7 million to $23.6 million in the first nine months of 2008 from $21.9 million in the same period a year ago. Approximately 2.4 points of the gross margin improvement was as the result of the change in Cobra’s North American mass market mobile navigation strategy as previously discussed including the positive effect of pricing stability during the period for the NAV ONE 5000, which was introduced late in 2007. Also contributing to the gross margin improvement was significantly lower air freight and the favorable impact of new, higher-margin models such as the 29 LTD BT Citizens Band radio and the XRS 9950 radar detector that includes an optional speed/red light camera GPS locator with Cobra’s proprietary verified data for the entire United States and Canada.

	Mobile Navigation/ GPS Products Gross Profit (Loss)			Other Products Gross Profit			Total Gross Profit
	(in thousands)
2008 gross profit	$	(11	)	$	23,604		$	23,593
2007 gross (loss) profit		(2,074	)		24,007			21,933
Increase	$	2,063		$	(403	)	$	1,660
2008 gross margin		-3.6	%		28.1	%		28.0	%
2007 gross margin		-33.6	%		25.6	%		21.9	%

Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased $2.3 million, or 9.5%, to $22.0 million in the first nine months of 2008 from $24.3 million in the first nine months of 2007. The decrease was due to less variable selling expenses because of the lower sales as well as headcount reductions, lower professional fees and management’s efforts to reduce spending.

Other expense, including interest, was $969,000 higher in the first nine months of 2008 as compared to the same period of 2007 mainly because of a $780,000 loss in 2008 on the cash surrender value of life insurance compared to a $193,000 gain in the prior year. Interest expense decreased $338,000 because of lower borrowing levels and a decline in the interest rate.

As a result of the above, there was pre-tax profit of $63,000 in the first nine months of 2008 compared to a pre-tax loss of $2.9 million in the first nine months of 2007.

22

Performance Products Limited (“PPL”) Business Segment

PPL’s net sales increased $1.7 million, or 16.1%, to $12.1 million in the nine-month period ending September 30, 2008 from $10.4 million for the comparable 2007 period. Higher sales of smartphones and personal navigation products were partially offset by sales declines of GPS products. Sales of personal navigation products were aided by having a full array of products available for sale in 2008 compared to the limited availability in 2007 resulting from development and production problems.

Gross profit increased $2.2 million to $6.5 million, or 53.3%, in the nine-months ending September 30, 2008 from the $4.3 million, or 40.8%, for the prior year period. The increase in gross margin was due to higher sales volume and the mix impact as higher-margin download fees and smartphone sales accounted for a larger portion of the 2008 revenue.

Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $4.0 million for the first nine months of 2008 and for the same period of 2007. Expressed as a percentage of net sales, selling, general and administrative expenses were 33.1% in 2008 compared to 39.2% for 2007.

As a result of the above, pre-tax profit for the nine-month period ending September 30, 2008 increased to $2.8 million from $429,000 for the prior year’s period.

23

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

On January 31, 2002, the Company executed a three-year Revolving Credit Agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with three financial institutions, including LaSalle Bank National Association, as agent. In November 2005, the term of the agreement was amended to January 31, 2007. In October 2006, in connection with the PPL acquisition, the Credit Agreement was amended and restated for a five-year term and maximum loan limit of $53.6 million, including the $40 million revolver, a $7.0 million term loan and a $6.6 million delayed draw term loan. The delayed draw term loan was never activated. Borrowings under the Credit Agreement were secured by substantially all of the assets of the Company.

On February 15, 2008, the Company entered into a Loan and Security Agreement (the “LSA”) with The PrivateBank and Trust Company, as lender and agent, and RBS Citizens, N.A., as lender, for a $5.7 million term loan facility and a $40 million revolving credit facility. Both facilities mature on October 19, 2011 and replaced the previous Credit Agreement. During the transition period to The PrivateBank and RBS Citizens lenders, the Company was required to maintain cash on deposit with the prior lender to fund letters of credit; as of September 30, 2008 the cash collateral was no longer required. At September 30, 2008, the Company had interest bearing debt outstanding of $14.2 million, consisting of the $4.8 million term loan and $9.4 million in the revolver. As of September 30, 2008, availability was approximately $18.5 million under the revolving credit line based on the asset advance formulas.

Cobra Electronics U.K. Limited, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, completed the acquisition of 100% of the issued and outstanding share capital of PPL in 2006. Under the acquisition agreement, the purchase price for the issued share capital of PPL consisted of $21.2 million paid in cash at the closing of the transaction. The former shareholders of PPL were eligible to receive additional cash consideration of up to approximately $6.5 million based on the achievement of certain performance targets by PPL for the twelve-month period ended March 31, 2007 (the first earn-out period) and up to approximately $10.0 million for the fourteen-month period ended May 31, 2008 (the second earn-out period). No additional consideration was paid to the former shareholders for the first earn-out period; the former shareholders were eligible to recapture all or a portion of this first earn-out payment should the performance in the second earn-out period exceed the performance targets established for the payment of the entire second earn-out. Additionally, the former shareholders were eligible to earn additional consideration if the performance of PPL exceeded certain cumulative targets for the combined earn-out periods.

The second and final earn-out period in connection with the purchase agreement concluded on May 31, 2008. The aggregate amount of the final earn-out payment, which totaled $8.4 million, was paid to the former shareholders on October 20, 2008.

24

For the nine months ended September 30, 2008 net cash flows from operating activities were $10.2 million. Significant net cash inflows from operations included net income of $1.9 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization of $4.5 million, a reduction in accounts receivable of $4.0 million, a decrease in inventory of $3.5 million and an increase in accrued income taxes of $716,000. The decrease in accounts receivable resulted from collections on sales from the fourth quarter of 2007. The decrease in inventory was due to mainly lower Cobra mobile navigation inventory as a result of the change in Cobra’s North American mass market mobile navigation strategy as previously discussed and lower inventory at PPL because of higher sales. The increase in accrued income taxes was due to the strong profits at PPL in 2008.

Partially offsetting these inflows was a decrease in accrued liabilities of $4.0 million. The decrease in accrued liabilities was due to two factors. First, accrued advertising and sales promotion costs declined as payments to customers for fourth quarter 2007 advertising and sales promotion programs more than offset similar accruals made in the first quarter of 2008 on lower sales. Second, there was a large reduction in the warranty reserve established at December 31, 2007 for the Company’s change in its North American mobile navigation strategy, which reflected customer returns in the first nine months of 2008. In the fourth quarter of 2007, $7.5 million was charged to cost of sales for costs related to the change in the Company’s mobile navigation strategy in North America, including the impairment of certain intellectual property, the write down of certain mobile navigation inventory, related parts and other assets to estimated net realizable value and the disposition of future product returns by means other than returning them to vendors for credit against new products. At September 30, 2008, the total remaining amount of reserves established for this change in strategy was approximately $326,000. Of this amount, $132,000 was for a warranty reserve for the disposition of future product returns by means other than returning them to vendors for credit against new products, $178,000 was to reduce certain mobile navigation parts to their estimated net realizable value and $16,000 was for a NRV reserve, which reduced mobile navigation products returned from customers to their estimated net realizable value.

Working capital requirements are seasonal, with demand for working capital being higher later in the year as customers begin purchasing for the holiday selling season. The Company believes that cash generated from operations and from borrowings under its credit agreement will be sufficient in 2008 to fund its working capital needs.

Net cash used in investing activities amounted to $783,000 in the first nine months of 2008. $154,000 was due to a decrease in intangible assets and $642,000 was used for capital expenditures, principally tooling, both of which were lower than in prior years because of the change in the Company’s North American mobile navigation strategy.

Net cash used in the first nine months of 2008 for financing activities totaled $6.8 million due to the Company’s annual cash dividend of $0.16 per share as well as a $5.7 million reduction in long-term debt. The 2008 annual dividend payment of $1.0 million was paid on April 25, 2008 to shareholders of record on April 11, 2008.

25

The $8.4 million earn-out payment due to the former PPL shareholders was recorded as payable and as additional purchase price in goodwill in September 2008. The $8.4 million was subsequently paid on October 20, 2008. Accordingly, there was no effect on the net cash used in investing activities for the nine-month period ending September 30, 2008.

The Company believes that for the foreseeable future, it will be able to continue to fund its operations with cash generated from operations using existing or similar future bank credit agreements to fund its seasonal working capital.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

The Company’s significant accounting policies and estimates are discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements. The application of certain of these policies requires significant judgments or a historical based estimation process that can affect the results of operations and financial position of the Company as well as the related footnote disclosures. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and other assumptions that it believes are reasonable. If actual amounts ultimately differ from previous estimates, the revisions are included in the Company’s results of operations for the period in which the actual amounts become known.

Critical accounting policies and estimates generally consist of those that reflect significant judgments and uncertainties and could potentially result in materially different results under different assumptions. For a description of the Company’s critical accounting polices and estimates refer to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of that term in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 found at Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Exchange Act. Additional written or oral forward-looking statements may be made by the Company from time to time in filings with the SEC, press releases, or otherwise. Statements contained in this report that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act. Forward-looking statements may include, but are not limited to, projections of revenue, income or loss and capital expenditures, statements regarding future operations, anticipated financing needs, compliance with financial covenants in loan agreements, liquidity, plans for acquisitions or sales of assets or businesses, plans relating to products or services, assessments of materiality, expansion into international markets, growth trends in the consumer electronics business, technological and market developments in the consumer electronics business, the availability of new consumer electronics products and predictions of future events, as well as assumptions relating to these statements. In addition, when used in this report, the words “anticipates,” “believes,” “should,” “estimates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans” and variations thereof and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements.

26

Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, some of which cannot be predicted or quantified based on current expectations. Consequently, future events and actual results could differ materially from those set forth in, contemplated by or underlying the forward-looking statements contained in this report or in other Company filings, press releases, or otherwise. Factors that could contribute to or cause such differences include, but are not limited to, unanticipated developments in any one or more of the following areas:

• global economic and market conditions, including continuation of or changes in the current economic environment;

• ability of the Company to introduce new products to meet consumer needs, including timely introductions as new consumer technologies are introduced, and customer and consumer acceptance of these new product introductions;

• pressure for the Company to reduce prices for older products as newer technologies are introduced;

• significant competition in the consumer electronics business, including introduction of new products and changes in pricing;

• factors related to foreign manufacturing, sourcing and sales (including foreign government regulation, trade and importation, and health and safety concerns, and effects of fluctuation in exchange rates);

• the effect of increasing commodity prices on the costs of products and the ability of the Company to mitigate such increases, if any, through product design, manufacturing efficiencies, price increases or other actions.

• ability of the Company to maintain adequate financing, to bear the interest cost of such financing and to remain in compliance with financing covenants;

• changes in law;

• ability to successfully integrate acquisitions, including PPL;

• consolidation of content providers in the mobile navigation industry;

• acquisition of mobile navigation content providers by competitors;

• and other risk factors, which may be detailed from time to time in the Company’s SEC filings.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained in this report, which speak only as of the date set forth on the signature page hereto. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the result of any revisions to these forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after such date or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

27

Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risks related to changes in foreign currency exchange risks and interest rates are inherent to the Company’s operations. Changes to these factors could cause fluctuations in the Company’s net earnings, cash flows and the fair values of financial instruments subject to market risks. The Company identifies these risks and mitigates the financial impact with hedging and interest rate swaps.

There have been no material changes in the Company’s market risk since December 31, 2007. Beginning in the second quarter of 2008, the Company began purchasing certain products in euros to mitigate the economic impact of the declining value of the U.S. dollar.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC rules and forms. The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures have also been designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the principal executive officer and principal financial officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

As of September 30, 2008, the Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on this evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer of the Company have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) are effective as of September 30, 2008.

There has been no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the first nine months of 2008 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

28

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1A. Risk Factors

There have been no material changes to the risk factors as previously disclosed under Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

Item 6. Exhibits

a) Exhibit 10.1 First Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Select Executives.

b) Exhibit 10.2 Cobra Electronics Corporation Severance Pay Plan.

c) Exhibit 10.3 First Amendment to Cobra Electronics Corporation Severance Pay Plan.

d) Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

e) Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a)/15d–14(a) Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

f) Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Executive Officer.

g) Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350 Certification of the Chief Financial Officer.

29

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
By	/s/ MICHAEL SMITH
	Michael Smith
	Senior Vice President and
	Chief Financial Officer
	(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal
	Financial Officer)

Dated: November 13, 2008

30

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit Number	Description of Document
10.1	First Amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan for Select Executives
10.2	Cobra Electronics Corporation Severance Pay Plan
10.3	First Amendment to Cobra Electronics Corporation Severance Pay Plan
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
32.1	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
32.2	Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

31

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

DEFERRED COMPENSATION PLAN

FOR SELECT EXECUTIVES

WHEREAS, Cobra Electronics Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”), has heretofore adopted and maintains a deferred compensation plan titled the “Cobra Electronics Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Select Executives” (the “Plan”) for the benefit of a select group of management and highly compensated employees; and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan in certain respects.

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 11 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows:

1. Effective January 1, 2001, Section 2(i) of the Plan is amended to read as follows:

(i) Years of Service. The number of complete years included in the period of time commencing on January 1, 1999 and ending on the date the Participant’s employment with the Company terminates; provided, however, that for any individual who is not selected by the Company to participate in the Plan and identified on Exhibit A until on or after January 1, 2001, “Years of Service” shall mean the number of complete years included in the period of time commencing on the date set forth in Exhibit A for such purpose and ending on the date the Participant’s employment with the Company terminates.

2. Effective July 31, 2001, Exhibit A to the Plan shall be amended to read as follows:

EXHIBIT A

PLAN PARTICIPANTS

Gerald Laures, whose Years of Service, as defined in Section 2(i), shall be determined with respect to the period of time commencing January 1, 1999 and ending on the date his employment with the Company terminates.

Anthony Mirabelli, whose Years of Service, as defined in Section 2(i), shall be determined with respect to the period of time commencing on January 1, 1999 and ending on the date his employment with the Company terminates.

Michael Smith, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, whose Years of Service, as defined in Section 2(i), shall be determined with respect to the period of time commencing on January 31, 2001 and ending on the date his employment with the Company terminates.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 6^th day of September 2001.

COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION
By:	/s/ James R. Bazet
Title:	President and Chief Executive Officer

1

EX-10.2

Exhibit 10.2

COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

(Effective January 1, 2006)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

SECTION 1	1
SECTION 2	1
SECTION 3	4
SECTION 4	9
SECTION 5	10
SECTION 6	11
SECTION 7	12
SECTION 8	13

COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

SECTION 1

Introduction

This document constitutes both the plan document and the summary plan description of the Cobra Electronics Corporation Severance Pay Plan (the “Plan”). The Plan is an “employee welfare benefit plan” within the meaning of section 3(1) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”). This document is provided by Cobra Electronics Corporation (the “Company”) to Eligible Employees as required by ERISA. Eligible Employees should keep this document for future reference.

The Plan has been adopted by the Company to provide severance benefits to Eligible Employees of the Company who are on or after January 1, 2006 provided individual written notice by the Company of their termination of employment.

An Eligible Employee is entitled to receive severance benefits under the Plan only if all of the conditions of Section 3 are satisfied with respect to that Eligible Employee.

By adopting the Plan, the Company has terminated as of December 31, 2005 any and all plans, policies and other arrangements previously adopted or maintained by the Company providing severance or other termination benefits to employees, except for (i) employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement, (ii) employees who before January 1, 2006 were awarded a benefit upon termination of employment occurring before January 1, 2006, and (iii) individual written agreements executed by the Company. Employees who have questions about the Plan should contact Vice President, Human Resources of the Company (telephone number (773) 804-3475).

SECTION 2

Definitions

Generally, as explained in Section 3 in greater detail, an “Eligible Employee” who incurs a “Qualified Termination of Employment,” which is either due to “Performance Deficiencies” or a “Reduction in Force,” may be awarded “Severance Pay” by the Company. The number of payments of Severance Pay and the amount of each payment are determined based on various factors, two of which are the Eligible Employee’s number of “Years of Service” and “Weekly Compensation.” These terms and others are defined in this Section.

“Eligible Employee” means each individual who is an employee of the Company regularly scheduled to work at least 30 hours per week at a location of the Company in the United States of America, who has at least six months of continuous employment with the Company since his most recent hire date, and who is on or after January 1, 2006 provided individual written notice by the Company of his Qualified Termination of Employment. However, in no event does “Eligible Employee” include

(1) any person included in a unit of employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement between employee representatives and the Company,

(2) any person employed on a temporary or seasonal basis,

1

(3) any person classified by the Company for purposes of income tax withholding or employment taxes as an independent contractor, without regard to any retroactive reclassification of him as an employee,

(4) any person rendering services to the Company pursuant to an agreement (A) characterizing him as an independent contractor, (B) with another organization, or (C) that includes a waiver of participation in the Plan, or

(5) any person who has an individual written agreement with the Company providing for severance or other termination benefits, or any other types of benefits, upon termination of employment with the Company, regardless of whether such benefits are subject to requirements or conditions (e.g., the person not being terminated by the Company for performance deficiencies).

“Qualified Termination of Employment” means an Eligible Employee’s involuntary termination of employment with the Company that is initiated by the Company due to Performance Deficiencies or a Reduction in Force. However, in no event does a “Qualified Termination of Employment” include

(1) a termination of employment for cause or misconduct, such as dishonesty, job-related breaches of conduct, violations of Company policies or standards of conduct (e.g., failure to report to work for three days without notification to the employee’s supervisor), and excessive tardiness or absenteeism, or inattention to job responsibilities, as determined by the Company in its sole and absolute discretion,

(2) a retirement, resignation or other voluntary termination of employment (including any failure to return to active employment when able to do so other than during an approved leave of absence),

(3) a termination of employment due to death,

(4) a termination of employment due to sickness, illness or disability, or other medical or personal reason, that is not an approved absence from work,

(5) a termination of employment after the employee receives an offer of employment in a different position from the Company, or in the same or different position from another employer which at the time of the offer is affiliated (by reason of stock ownership, partnership or business venture) with the Company or any affiliate of the Company, if the offer is at a base wage or salary level at least comparable to the employee’s base wage or salary level at the time of the offer and if the offer is to work at the same location (including any other location considered by the Company in its sole and absolute discretion to be within a reasonable daily commuting distance from the same location), or

2

(6) a termination of employment after the employee receives an offer of employment from a Divested Employer if the offer is at a base wage or salary level at least comparable to the employee’s base wage or salary level at the time of the offer and if the offer is to work at the same location (including any other location considered by the Company in its sole and absolute discretion to be within a reasonable daily commuting distance from the same location). For this purpose, “Divested Employer” means (i) a division, subsidiary, venture, partnership, other business segment or the entire business of the Company or of an affiliate of the Company which has been or is proposed to be no longer affiliated with the Company or with an affiliate of the Company, (ii) the proposed or actual acquirer of a business described in clause (i) or of any assets of it by reason of merger, ownership or acquisition of stock or assets or otherwise, or (iii) any affiliate of an entity described in clause (i) or (ii).

“Performance Deficiencies” means a determination by the Company in the Company’s sole and absolute discretion that the employee provided his or her best efforts and the employee’s job performance does not meet the performance objectives or standards for the employee’s position.

“Reduction in Force” means the Company’s elimination of the Eligible Employee’s employment position, the Company’s decision to have no one assigned to the Eligible Employee’s employment position, changes in the Company’s business, technology or workplace that results in the Company’s lack of need for the employee’s skills, or a reduction in the Company’s work force, in each case as determined by the Company in its sole and absolute discretion.

“Severance Pay” means periodic payments of Weekly Compensation awarded to an Eligible Employee pursuant to Section 3.

“Weekly Compensation” means the Eligible Employee’s weekly base hourly pay or weekly base salary pay, excluding shift differential, overtime, bonuses and other incentive amounts, in effect immediately prior to the day on which the Eligible Employee’s employment as an active employee terminates pursuant to a Qualified Termination of Employment.

“Years of Service” means the Eligible Employee’s total number of full years of employment with the Company beginning on the Eligible Employee’s most recent date of hire or beginning on the Eligible Employee’s adjusted service date if the employee has had a break in service of less than five years.

“Company” means Cobra Electronics Corporation, in its capacity as Plan sponsor and not as a fiduciary of the Plan. All awards of benefits and other determinations and actions taken by the Company with respect to the Plan are taken by its Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, or any officer or management employee of the Company to the extent expressly provided in the Plan or authorized in writing by the Board of Directors or that committee.

“Plan Administrator” means Cobra Electronics Corporation, in its capacity as “administrator” (as that term is used in ERISA) of the Plan.

“Committee” means the committee appointed by the Board of Directors of the Company pursuant to Section 4 to administer the Plan.

3

SECTION 3

Award and Payment of Severance Pay

Award of Severance Pay

An Eligible Employee who incurs a Qualified Termination of Employment and signs a release and waiver of claims described below will be awarded Severance Pay. Any award of Severance Pay is made only pursuant to a writing signed by the Vice President, Human Resources of the Company.

Release and Waiver of Claims

As a precondition to any award of Severance Pay, the Eligible Employee must sign a release and waiver of claims against the Company and its affiliates, and their directors, officers, employees and agents, and related persons. The release and waiver of claims must be in the form as determined by the Company in its sole and absolute discretion.

The release and waiver of claims may also provide, in the sole and absolute discretion of the Company, that the Eligible Employee agrees to one or more restrictive covenants for the benefit of the Company and its affiliates and other related persons as may be required by the Company, including but not limited to the Eligible Employee not disparaging, competing with or soliciting customers or employees of the Company and its affiliates, and the Eligible Employee not infringing upon proprietary rights or disclosing confidential information of the Company and its affiliates.

Severance Pay Amount

Severance Pay, if awarded, has two components and, if the Qualified Termination of Employment is due to a Reduction in Force, may have an additional third and fourth components.

The first component is payment by the Company to the Eligible Employee of Weekly Compensation for two (2) weeks. This component is reflected in column (A) of the table below.

The second component is payment of Weekly Compensation for the number of weeks per the Eligible Employee’s full Years of Service indicated in column (B) of the table below.

If the Qualified Termination of Employment is due to a Reduction in Force, the Company may, in its sole and absolute discretion, include as a third component the payment of an additional number of weeks of Weekly Compensation, but not more than the maximum additional number of weeks indicated in column (C) of the table below. Any such award by the Company will be made only pursuant to a determination of both the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and the Vice President, Human Resources of the Company and their execution and delivery to the Eligible Employee of a written notice evidencing their determination.

4

However, in no event will the total number of weeks of Weekly Compensation awarded under the three components described above be greater than sixteen weeks.

Lastly, if the Qualified Termination of Employment is due to a Reduction in Force and the eligible Employee is at least age 50, Severance Pay will include as a fourth component the payment of an additional number of weeks of Weekly Compensation determined by the eligible Employee’s age. If the Eligible Employee is at least age 50 but less than 55, one additional week of Weekly Compensation will be awarded. If at least age 55 but less than 60, two additional weeks of Weekly Compensation will be awarded. If at least age 60, three additional weeks of Weekly Compensation will be awarded. These additional payments are not subject to the sixteen week limit described above.

The Company makes payments of Severance Pay to an Eligible Employee on a weekly, bi-weekly or other basis to correspond with the regular payroll practices of the Company as applicable to that Eligible Employee. The total amount of benefits provided to an Eligible Employee under the Plan is not to be increased as a result of payments being made on a bi-weekly or other basis.

Summary Table of Severance Pay Components

	Subject to 16 Week Maximum			Not Subject to 16 Week Maximum
Position Criteria	(A) Number of Weeks of Weekly Compensation	(B) Number of Weeks of Weekly Compensation per Full Year of Service	(C) Reduction in Force Number of Additional Discretionary Weeks of Weekly Compensation	(D) Reduction in Force Additional Age-Based Number of Weeks of Weekly Compensation1
All Non-Exempt Employees	2 weeks	1 week/year	0 – 2 additional weeks	1 –3 additional weeks
All Exempt Employees Other Than Those Below	2 weeks	1 week/year	0 – 4 additional weeks	1 –3 additional weeks
Participants in the Management Incentive Plan or Sales Management Incentive Plan	2 weeks	1.5 weeks/year	0 – 6 additional weeks	1 –3 additional weeks
Participants in the Executive Incentive Plan	2 weeks	2 weeks/year	0 – 8 additional weeks	1 –3 additional weeks

¹ If the Eligible Employee is at least age 50 but less than age 55, payment of one additional week of Weekly Compensation; if the Eligible Employee is at least age 55 but less than age 60, payment of two additional weeks of Weekly Compensation; and if the Eligible Employee is at least age 60, payment of three additional weeks of Weekly Compensation.

5

Examples Of Severance Pay Awards

Example 1: Nate is a 48 year-old, non-exempt Eligible Employee who has nineteen full Years of Service. His position is eliminated and no other position is available. Severance Pay is awarded and the Company exercises its discretion to award two additional weeks of Weekly Compensation (column (C)). The Severance Pay award is for 16 weeks of Weekly Compensation, determined as follows:

Base component (column (A))	2 weeks
Service based component (column (B))	19 weeks
Additional discretionary component (column (C))	2 weeks
Total of above but not more than 16 weeks	16 weeks
Age-based component (column (D))	0 weeks
TOTAL weeks of Weekly Compensation awarded	16 weeks

Example 2: Liz is a 63 year-old exempt Eligible Employee who does not participate in an incentive plan and who has six full Years of Service. Her position is eliminated and no other position is available. Severance Pay is awarded and the Company exercises its discretion to award three additional weeks of Weekly Compensation (column (C)). The Severance Pay award is for 14 weeks of Weekly Compensation, determined as follows:

	Base component (column (A))	2 weeks
	Service based component (column (B))	6 weeks
	Additional discretionary component (column (C))	3 weeks
	Total of above but not more than 16 weeks	11 weeks
	Age-based component (column (D))	3 weeks
TOTAL weeks of Weekly Compensation awarded		14 weeks

Example 3: Larry is a 41 year-old exempt Eligible Employee who does not participate in an incentive plan and who has eighteen full Years of Service. His employment is terminated for Performance Deficiencies. Severance Pay is awarded. The Severance Pay award is for 16 weeks of Weekly Compensation, determined as follows:

	Base component (column (A))	2 weeks
	Service based component (column (B))	18 weeks
	Additional discretionary component (column (C))	not applicable
	Total of above but not more than 16 weeks	16 weeks
	Age-based component (column (D))	not applicable
TOTAL weeks of Weekly Compensation awarded		16 weeks

6

Example 4: Jane is a 52 year-old Eligible Employee who is a participant in the Management Incentive Plan and who has three full Years of Service. Her employment is terminated for Performance Deficiencies. Severance Pay is awarded. The Severance Pay award is for 6.5 weeks of Weekly Compensation, determined as follows:

	Base component (column (A))	2 weeks
	Service based component (column (B))	4.5 weeks
	Additional discretionary component (column (C))	not applicable
	Total of above but not more than 16 weeks	6.5 weeks
	Age-based component (column (D))	not applicable
TOTAL weeks of Weekly Compensation awarded		6.5 weeks

Extraordinary Awards

In extraordinary circumstances that, in the sole and absolute discretion of the Company, warrant consideration by the Company of an award of Severance Pay for a number of weekly payments in excess of the maximum number of payments otherwise applicable pursuant to the above provisions, the Company may, in its sole and absolute discretion, make an award of Severance Pay in excess of such maximum number of payments. Any such exercise of discretion by the Company will be made only pursuant to a determination of the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company and delivery to the Eligible Employee of a writing evidencing the determination and signed by the Vice President, Human Resources of the Company.

Reduction or Termination of Severance Pay for Other Amounts

Each payment of Severance Pay is reduced by withholdings and deductions required under federal, state and local laws and by other applicable reductions. The Company may reduce the number of payments or the amount of any payment to be made pursuant to a Severance Award as it deems appropriate in its sole and absolute discretion for any amount owed (whether or not due or payable) by the employee to the Company. Any reduction may occur either at the time of the award or at any time thereafter. Amounts of Severance Pay shall offset any amounts that may be payable by the Company to the Eligible Employee pursuant to The Workers Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act and any similar law.

Restrictions Under Section 409A of the Code

Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this Plan, if any payment of Severance Pay with respect to an Eligible Employee constitutes a deferral of compensation under section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), and the Eligible Employee is a “specified employee” within the meaning of section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code, then no payment of Severance Pay will commence any earlier than the earliest of: (i) six months and one day after the Eligible Employee has a “separation from service” within the meaning of section 409A, (ii) the occurrence of a “change in control” within the meaning of section 409A, (iii) the Eligible Employee’s death, (iv) the occurrence of the Eligible Employee’s “disability” within the

7

meaning of section 409A, (v) any other date permitted by section 409A(a)(2) and (a)(3) of the Code, and (vi) any other date permitted by the Internal Revenue Service or U.S. Department of Treasury in its interpretation of section 409A. Section 409A(a)(2)(B)(i) of the Code “ generally defines “specified employees” to include only 5% owners of the Company, 1% owners of the Company with annual compensation from the Company of at least $150,000, and officers of the Company with annual compensation from the Company of at least $135,000 (increased from time to time for cost-of-living adjustments).

Reemployment and Severance Pay

Upon reemployment of a person by the Company or any affiliate of the Company, all payments of Severance Pay being made to that person terminate and no further payments are made. Upon any subsequent Qualified Termination of Employment, any period prior to the recommencement of employment is ignored for purposes of determining the number of weekly payments of Severance Pay the Eligible Employee may be awarded with respect to the subsequent termination of employment.

Death While Receiving Severance Payments

If an Eligible Employee dies after receiving an award of Severance Pay and before the final payment of Severance Pay is made to him, the remaining payments are made in one lump sum payment to the beneficiary designated by the Eligible Employee or, if there is no such designated beneficiary that survives the Eligible Employee, then to the Eligible Employee’s surviving spouse or, if the Eligible Employee has no surviving spouse, then to the Eligible Employee’s estate. Any beneficiary designation to be made by an Eligible Employee must be made on a form provided by the Company for this purpose and the designation is only effective if delivered by the Eligible Employee to the Company prior to his death.

Retirement and Other Benefits

The payment of Severance Pay to an Eligible Employee does not affect either the Eligible Employee’s right to receive benefits under any retirement plan maintained by the Company or the amount of any benefits except to the extent provided by that retirement plan. Severance Pay is not considered “Compensation” under the Cobra Electronics Corporation Profit Sharing and 401(k) Incentive Savings Plan. Therefore, an Eligible Employee is not entitled to any contributions to that plan with regard to any Severance Pay.

Other than continued participation in the Company’s health and dental insurance plans as described below, the payment of Severance Pay does not extend the date of the Eligible Employee’s termination of employment for purposes of any retirement plan, life insurance plan, disability plan, or any other employee benefit or fringe benefit plan of the Company. Therefore, termination of employment and rights under those plans are determined without considering any award of Severance Pay.

8

Continued Medical and Dental Insurance

Upon a Qualified Termination of Employment, the medical and dental insurance provided under the Company’s group plans to the Eligible Employee, his spouse and dependents at the time of his Qualified Termination of Employment continue only as provided under the Company’s normal procedures. As of January 1, 2006, those procedures provide for such coverage to continue through the end of the month during which the Eligible Employee terminates employment. At that time, the Eligible Employee and his qualified beneficiaries have the right to extend medical and dental insurance under any COBRA rights they may have. If medical or dental coverage is extended under COBRA rights, the Company will pay the COBRA premium through the end of the last month for which any payments of Severance Pay are made. After that month, the Eligible Employee and his qualified beneficiaries who elect COBRA continuation coverage will be responsible for paying the COBRA premiums.

SECTION 4

Administration of the Plan

In General

The Company is the “named fiduciary” and “administrator” of the Plan within the meaning of those terms as used in the ERISA. The board of directors of the Company appoints a committee consisting of two or more members (the “Committee”) to be responsible for carrying out the Company’s responsibilities as named fiduciary and administrator, including all aspects of Plan administration (other than the awarding of Severance Pay). The board of directors of the Company has the right at any time, with or without cause, to remove any member of the Committee. A member of the Committee may resign and his resignation is effective upon delivery of his written resignation to the Company. Upon the resignation, removal or failure or inability for any reason of any member of the Committee to act, the board of directors of the Company appoints a successor member. All successor members of the Committee have all the rights, privileges and duties of their predecessors, but are not held accountable for the acts of their predecessors.

Any member of the Committee may, but need not, be an employee or a director, officer or shareholder of the Company, and that status will not disqualify him from taking any action under the Plan, provided that no member of the Committee may take part in any action of the Committee on any matter involving solely his rights under the Plan.

The Committee has the duty and authority to interpret and construe the Plan in regard to all questions concerning the status and rights of persons under the Plan, but only to the extent that such duty and authority does not limit the Company’s right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to determine whether any particular person will be awarded Severance Pay and, if so, the number of payments.

9

The Committee may act at a meeting, or by writing without a meeting, by the vote or written assent of a majority of its members. The Committee may adopt rules and procedures that it deems desirable for the conduct of its affairs and the administration of the Plan, provided that any rules and procedures must be consistent with the provisions of the Plan and ERISA.

The Company indemnifies the members of the Committee and each of them from the effects and consequences of their acts, omissions and conduct in their official capacity, except to the extent that the effects and consequences result from their own willful misconduct.

The Committee may employ counsel (who may be counsel for the Company) and agents and may arrange for clerical and other services as it requires in carrying out the provisions of the Plan.

Claims Procedure

Any employee or former employee of the Company who believes that he is entitled to receive Severance Pay under the Plan, including Severance Pay other than that initially determined by the Company, may file a claim in writing with the Committee. No later than 90 days after the receipt of a claim, the Committee will allow or deny the claim in writing.

A denial of a claim, in whole or in part, will be written in a manner calculated to be understood by the claimant and will include (1) the specific reason or reasons for the denial, (2) specific reference to pertinent Plan provisions on which the denial is based, (3) a description of any additional material or information necessary for the claimant to perfect the claim and an explanation of why such material or information is necessary, and (4) an explanation of the claim review procedure.

A claimant whose claim is denied (or his duly authorized representative) may within 60 days after receipt of denial of his claim (1) request a review upon written application to the Committee, (2) review pertinent documents, and (3) submit issues and comments in writing.

The Committee will notify the claimant of its decision on review within 60 days after receipt of a request for review unless special circumstances require an extension of time for processing, in which case a decision will be rendered as soon as possible, but not later than 120 days after receipt of a request for review. Notice of the decision on review will be in writing. The Committee’s decision on review will be final and binding on any employee or former employee of the Company or any successor in interest of either.

SECTION 5

Amendment or Termination of the Plan

Right to Amend or Terminate

The Company reserves the right to, and will by action of its Board of Directors, at any time, without any necessary prior notice to or approval of any employee or former employee, amend or terminate the Plan in any particular manner; provided, however, that no amendment or termination will adversely affect the benefits or rights provided, or to be provided, under the Plan to an Eligible Employee in connection with an award of Severance Pay that occurs on or prior to the date on which the amendment or termination is adopted by the Company.

10

SECTION 6

Miscellaneous

Limitation on Rights

Participation in the Plan does not give any employee the right to be retained in the service of the Company or any rights to any benefits whatsoever, except to the extent specifically set forth in the Plan.

Method of Funding

The Company will pay all Severance Pay from current operating funds. No property of the Company is or will be, by reason of the Plan, held in trust for any employee of the Company. No person will have any interest in or any lien or prior claim upon any property of the Company by reason of the Plan or the Company’s obligation to pay Severance Pay.

Governing Law

The Plan will be construed and enforced in accordance with ERISA and the laws of the State of Illinois to the extent such laws are not preempted by ERISA.

Assignments

No rights, obligations or liabilities of an Eligible Employee hereunder are assignable or otherwise alienable, other than by a transfer by an Eligible Employee’s will or by the laws of descent and distribution, without the prior written consent of the Company.

11

SECTION 7

Additional Plan Information

Plan Name:	Cobra Electronics Corporation Severance Pay Plan
Plan Number:	505
Plan Sponsor:	Cobra Electronics Corporation
	6500 West Cortland
	Chicago, Illinois 60707
	(773) 889-8870
Plan Sponsor’s Employer
Identification Number:	36-2479991
Plan Administrator:	Cobra Electronics Corporation
	c/o Vice President, Human Resources
	6500 West Cortland
	Chicago, Illinois 60707
	(773) 889-8870
Agent for Service of Legal Process:	Vice President, Human Resources
	Cobra Electronics Corporation
	6500 West Cortland
	Chicago, Illinois 60707
	(773) 889-8870
Plan Year:	January 1 – December 31

12

SECTION 8

Employees’ Rights Under ERISA

The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) was enacted to help assure that all employer-sponsored group benefits programs conform to standards set by Congress. The Cobra Electronics Corporation Severance Pay Plan is covered by ERISA and an employee who is a participant in the Plan is entitled to certain rights and protections. ERISA provides that all Plan participants entitled to:

(1) Examine, without charge, at the Company’s office, all Plan documents and copies of all documents filed by the Plan with the U.S. Department of Labor, such as detailed annual reports and Plan descriptions.

(2) Obtain copies of all Plan documents and other Plan information upon written request to the Company.

In addition to creating rights for Plan participants, ERISA also sets forth certain duties for the people who are responsible for the operation of the Plan. The people who operate the Plan are called “fiduciaries” of the Plan. They have a duty to operate the Plan prudently and in the best interests of Plan participants and beneficiaries. No one, including the Company or any other person, may fire an employee or otherwise discriminate against an employee to prevent an employee from either obtaining any Plan benefit or exercising his or her rights under ERISA. However, neither the existence of the Plan nor this summary plan description constitutes an employment contract or affects the right of the Company to lawfully terminate an employee’s employment.

If an employee’s claim for a Plan benefit is denied in whole or in part, the employee must receive a written explanation of the reasons for the denial. An employee has the right to have the Committee review and reconsider his or her claim.

Under ERISA, there are steps an employee can take to enforce the above rights. For instance, if an employee requests materials from the Plan and does not receive them within 30 days, he may file suit in a federal court. In such a case, the court may require the Committee to provide the materials and pay an employee up to $100 per day until he receives the materials (unless the materials were not sent because of reasons beyond the control of the Committee). If an employee has a claim for benefits which is denied or ignored, in whole or in part, he may file suit in a state or federal court. If it should happen that Plan fiduciaries misuse the Plan’s money, or if an employee is discriminated against for asserting his rights, he may seek assistance from the U.S. Department of Labor, or he may file suit in a federal court. The court will decide who should pay court costs and legal fees. If an employee is successful, the court may order the person the employee has sued to pay these costs and fees. If the employee loses, the court may order the employee to pay these costs and fees (for example, if the court finds the employee’s claim is frivolous). If an employee has any questions about the Plan, the employee should contact the Committee.

If an employee has any questions about this statement or about his rights under ERISA he should contact the nearest Area Office of U.S. Labor-Management Services Administration, Department of Labor.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officer this 21 ^st day of December, 2005.

    /s/ Michael Smith

    Michael Smith

    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

13

EX-10.3

Exhibit 10.3

FIRST AMENDMENT TO

COBRA ELECTRONICS CORPORATION

SEVERANCE PAY PLAN

WHEREAS, Cobra Electronics Corporation, a Delaware Corporation (the “Company”), has heretofore adopted and maintains a severance pay plan titled the “Cobra Electronics Corporation Severance Pay Plan” (the “Plan”) for the benefit of “Eligible Employees” incurring a “Qualified Termination of Employment,” as those terms are defined in the Plan; and

WHEREAS, the Company desires to amend the Plan to conform to the requirements of section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as enacted by the American Jobs Creation Act of 2004;

NOW THEREFORE, pursuant to the power of amendment contained in Section 5 of the Plan, the Plan is hereby amended as follows with respect to persons receiving “Severance Pay,” as that term is defined in the Plan, after December 31, 2007:

1. The definition of the term “Qualified Termination of Employment” appearing in Section 2 of the Plan is amended by adding the following language at the end of that definition:

For purposes of determining whether a “Qualified Termination of Employment” has occurred, the employee’s employment with the Company has terminated only if the employee has a “separation from service” with the Company as defined and determined pursuant to section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code” or “IRC”) and applicable regulations and other guidance promulgated by the Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”). In other words, the term “termination of employment” and similar terms are intended for purposes of this Plan to have the same meaning as the term “separation from service” as defined and determined for purposes of IRC §409A. In addition, an employee’s termination of employment with the Company is an involuntary termination only if the termination is due to the independent exercise of the unilateral authority of the Company to terminate the employee’s services in situations where the employee is willing and able to continue performing services, all within the meaning of IRC §409A and applicable regulations and other guidance promulgated by the IRS or as otherwise provided by such regulations and guidance.

2. Section 3 of the Plan is amended by revising the seventh paragraph under the heading “Severance Pay Amount” to read as follows:

The Company makes payments of Severance Pay to an Eligible Employee on a weekly, bi-weekly or other basis to correspond with the regular payroll practices of the Company as applicable to that Eligible Employee prior to the Eligible Employee’s termination of employment. Payments of Severance Pay commence on the first day after the Eligible Employee’s termination of employment on which the Eligible Employee’s next regular pay day would have occurred if the employee had not terminated employment. The total amount of benefits provided to an Eligible Employee under the Plan is not to be increased as a result of payments being made on a bi-weekly or other basis. Notwithstanding the preceding sentences, if any applicable law provides that the release or waiver required to be signed by the Eligible Employee will be ineffective if executed or revoked by the employee prior to the end of a certain period and such period has not expired by the end of the date on which payment of Severance Pay would be made, such payment will be delayed until the expiration of such period and paid as soon as administratively practicable after the expiration of such period but not later than the 90^th day following termination of employment as determined by the Company.

3. Section 3 of the Plan is amended by (i) revising the second sentence under the heading “Reduction or Termination of Severance Pay or Other Amounts” to add the following proviso at the end thereof and (ii) deleting the third sentence under that heading:

; provided, however, that (i) the reduction will only relate to debts of the employee incurred in the ordinary course of the employment relationship between the employee and the Company, (ii) the entire amount of the reduction in any calendar year will not exceed $5,000 and (iii) the reduction is made at the same time and in the same amount as the debt otherwise would have been due and collected from the employee.

1

4. Section 3 of the Plan is amended by revising the text under the heading “Restrictions Under Section 409A of the Code” to read as follows:

Restrictions Under Section 409A of the Code

The aggregate of the Severance Pay payments with respect to an Eligible Employee will not exceed the “IRC §409A Limitation Amount” which means two times the lesser of

(1) the sum of the employee’s annualized compensation based upon the employee’s annual rate of pay for services provided to the Company for the calendar year preceding the calendar year in which the termination of employment occurs (adjusted for any increase during that year that was expected to continue indefinitely if the employee had not terminated employment); or

(2) the maximum amount (which for 2008 is $230,000) that may be taken into account under a qualified plan pursuant to IRC §401(a)(17) for the calendar year in which the employee’s termination of employment occurs, all within the meaning of IRC §409A and applicable regulations and other guidance promulgated by the IRS or as otherwise provided by such regulations and guidance. The IRC §409A Limitation Amount will be reduced by the amount of any other amounts required by IRC §409A or applicable regulations or other guidance promulgated by the IRS to be aggregated with the Severance Pay for purposes of applying the IRC §409A Limitation Amount.

If the employee is a “specified employee” upon the employee’s termination of employment with the Company, as defined and determined pursuant to IRC §409A and applicable regulations and other guidance promulgated by the IRS, and if the Severance Pay will not be separation pay exempt from the six-month delay rule of IRC §409A and applicable regulations and other guidance promulgated by the IRS, then no payments of Severance Pay shall be made before the day that is six months after the day of the employee’s termination of employment. To the extent such payments are not made before such six-month anniversary day pursuant to the preceding sentence, such payments will be paid to the employee by the Company during the five-day period beginning on the first business day that is six months after the employee’s termination of employment. IRC §409A generally defines “specified employee” to include only 5% owners of the Company, 1% owners of the Company with annual compensation from the Company of at least $150,000, and officers of the Company with annual compensation from the Company of at least $135,000 (increased from time to time for cost-of-living adjustments).

In all events, Severance Pay payments will not continue beyond the last day of the second calendar year following the calendar year in which the employee’s termination of employment occurs.

5. Section 3 of the Plan is amended by replacing the first sentence of the text under the heading “Death While Receiving Severance Payments” with the following sentence:

If an Eligible Employee dies after receiving an award of Severance Pay and before the final payment of Severance Pay is made to him, the remaining payments will be made in one lump sum payment as soon as administratively practicable after such employee’s death, but not earlier than the first day following such employee’s death and not later than the 90^th day following such employee’s death, to the beneficiary designated by the Eligible Employee or, if there is no such designated beneficiary that survives the Eligible Employee, then to the Eligible Employee’s surviving spouse or, if the Eligible Employee has no surviving spouse, then to the Eligible Employee’s estate.

6. Section 4 of the Plan is amended by revising the first sentence under the heading “Claims Procedure” to add the following proviso at the end thereof:

; provided, however, that such claim is filed within 90 days of the latest date upon which the payment could have been timely made to the employee or former employee in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

2

7. Section 4 of the Plan is amended by adding the following sentence at the end of the fourth paragraph under the heading “Claims Procedure”:

If the Committee determines that the employee or former employee is entitled to benefits pursuant to the Plan in an amount greater than those which he has received, such additional benefits shall be paid to such employee or former employee in a lump sum no later than the end of the first calendar year in which the Committee makes such determination.

8. Section 5 of the Plan is hereby amended by revising the text under the heading “Right to Amend or Terminate” to read as follows:

Right to Amend or Terminate

The Company reserves the right to, and will by action of its Board of Directors, at any time, without any necessary prior notice to or approval of any employee or former employee, amend or terminate the Plan in any particular manner; provided, however, that no amendment or termination will adversely affect the benefits or rights provided, or to be provided, under the Plan to an Eligible Employee in connection with an award of Severance Pay that occurs on or prior to the date on which the amendment or termination is adopted by the Company except to the extent that such amendment is necessary or desirable to comply with any requirement of IRC §409A or any applicable regulation or other guidance promulgated by the IRS.

9. Section 6 of the Plan is amended by revising the text under the heading “Governing Law” to add the following sentence at the end thereof:

Notwithstanding anything in the Plan to the contrary, the payments under the Plan are intended to be exempt from IRC §409A to the maximum extent possible under the separation pay exemption pursuant to Treasury Regulation §1.409A-1(b)(9)(iii). In all events, the Plan is intended to comply with the provisions of IRC §409A and shall be interpreted and construed accordingly.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company has caused this instrument to be executed by its duly authorized officers this 28^th day of October, 2008.

    /s/ Michael Smith

    Michael Smith

    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

3

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a) Certification

of the Chief Executive Officer

I, James R. Bazet, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2008	/s/ James R. Bazet
	James R. Bazet
	Chief Executive Officer
	(Principal Executive Officer)

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d – 14(a) Certification

of the Chief Financial Officer

I, Michael Smith, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: November 13, 2008	/s/ Michael Smith
	Michael Smith
	Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
	(Principal Financial Officer)

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

Section 1350 Certification of the

Chief Executive Officer

I, James R. Bazet, the chief executive officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.

    /s/ James R. Bazet

    James R. Bazet

    November 13, 2008

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

Section 1350 Certification of the

Chief Financial Officer

I, Michael Smith, the chief financial officer of Cobra Electronics Corporation, certify that (i) the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Cobra Electronics Corporation for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2008 (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and (ii) the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Cobra Electronics Corporation and its subsidiaries.

    /s/ Michael Smith

    Michael Smith

    November 13, 2008