XML 58 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2012
Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]  
Fair Value Disclosures [Text Block]
Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (an exit price). Valuation techniques under the accounting guidance related to fair value measurements are based on observable and unobservable inputs. Observable inputs reflect readily obtainable data from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. These inputs are classified into the following hierarchy:

Level 1 Inputs - Quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

Level 2 Inputs - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; and model-derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable.

Level 3 Inputs - Pricing inputs are unobservable for the assets or liabilities and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the assets or liabilities. The inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

Financial Instruments

The following table presents the carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company's financial instruments at September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012.
 
September 30,
2012
 
January 1,
2012
 
 
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Carrying
Amount
 
Fair
Value
 
Fair Value
Measurements
Financial assets
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Non-current cost method investments (a)
$
25,111

 
$
33,815

 
$
27,452

 
$
62,496

 
Level 3
Interest rate swaps (b)
9,618

 
9,618

 
11,695

 
11,695

 
Level 2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Term Loan, due in 2019 (c)
1,114,415

 
1,125,559

 

 

 
Level 2
Senior Notes, repaid in July 2012 (c)

 

 
554,901

 
621,500

 
Level 2
Term Loan, repaid in May 2012 (c)

 

 
466,062

 
466,940

 
Level 2
6.20% senior notes, due in 2014 (c)
226,176

 
247,331

 
224,643

 
231,750

 
Level 2
7% debentures, due in 2025 (c)
83,207

 
95,400

 
82,342

 
84,000

 
Level 2
Capitalized lease obligations (d)
31,353

 
32,336

 
15,222

 
16,431

 
Level 3
Sale-leaseback obligations (d)
1,471

 
1,525

 
1,466

 
1,692

 
Level 3
6.54% aircraft term loan, repaid in June
2012 (d)

 

 
11,303

 
11,367

 
Level 3
Other
706

 
708

 
1,060

 
1,072

 
Level 3
Guarantees of franchisee loans
obligations (e)
$
951

 
$
951

 
$
1,275

 
$
1,275

 
Level 3
_______________

(a)
The fair value of our indirect investment in Arby’s is based on its sale in July 2011 and our subsequent review of Arby’s current unaudited financial information. The fair values of the remaining investments were principally based on quoted market or broker/dealer prices. To the extent that some of these investments, including the underlying investments in investment limited partnerships, do not have available quoted market or broker/dealer prices, we relied on our review of valuations performed by the investment managers or investees or third-party appraisals. The fair value of our investment in Jurlique at January 1, 2012 was based upon an agreement with a third party to purchase Jurlique (which was completed in February 2012). See Note 4 for more information related to the sale of Jurlique.

(b)
The fair values were based on information provided by the bank counterparties that is model-driven and where inputs were observable or where significant value drivers were observable.

(c)
The fair values were based on quoted market prices in markets that are not considered active markets.

(d)
The fair values were determined by discounting the future scheduled principal payments using an interest rate assuming the same original issuance spread over a current U.S. Treasury bond yield for securities with similar durations.

(e)
Wendy’s has provided loan guarantees to various lenders on behalf of franchisees entering into pooled debt facility arrangements for new store development and equipment financing. During the third quarter of 2012, Wendy’s provided a guarantee to a lender for a franchisee in connection with the refinancing of the franchisee’s debt (see Note 12). We have accrued a liability for the fair value of these guarantees, the calculation of which was based upon a weighted average risk percentage established at inception adjusted for a history of defaults.

The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses approximated fair value due to the short-term maturities of those items. The carrying amounts of accounts and notes receivable (both current and non-current) approximated fair value due to the effect of the related allowance for doubtful accounts.

Interest rate swaps

Our derivative instruments for the periods presented included interest rate swaps on our 6.20% senior notes with notional amounts totaling $225,000 that were all designated as fair value hedges. The fair value of our interest rate swaps of $9,618 and $11,695 at September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012, respectively, was included in “Deferred costs and other assets” and as an adjustment to the carrying amount of our 6.20% senior notes. Interest income on the interest rate swaps was $1,283 and $4,013 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2012, respectively, and $1,402 and $4,250 for the three and nine months ended October 2, 2011, respectively. No ineffectiveness has been recorded to net income related to our fair value hedges for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and October 2, 2011. Our interest rate swaps (and cash and cash equivalents as described above) are the only financial assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis.

The following tables present the level and measurement of assets measured on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2012 and January 1, 2012. The following tables also present total losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2012 and for the year ended January 1, 2012, which include losses recognized from all non-recurring fair value measurements during those periods. See Note 7 for more information on the impairment of our long-lived assets.
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
Nine Months Ended
September 30, 2012
Total Losses
 
September 30,
2012
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Properties and other intangible
assets (a)
$
4,771

 
$

 
$

 
$
4,771

 
$
6,153

Aircraft (b)
6,333

 

 

 
6,333

 
1,628

Total
$
11,104

 
$

 
$

 
$
11,104

 
$
7,781

    
 
Fair Value Measurements
 
2011 Total Losses
 
January 1,
2012
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
 
Properties and other intangible
assets (a)
$
575

 
$

 
$

 
$
575

 
$
12,883

Total
$
575

 
$

 
$

 
$
575

 
$
12,883

_______________

(a)
The impaired assets consist of land and buildings and other intangible assets. The fair values of impaired assets were generally estimated based on the present values of the associated cash flows and market values with respect to land.

(b)
The fair value of the aircraft was based on current market conditions.