UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x |
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014
Or
¨ |
Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to .
Commission file number: 002-25577
DIODES INCORPORATED
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware |
|
95-2039518 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
4949 Hedgcoxe Road, Suite 200 Plano, Texas |
|
75024 |
(Address of principal executive offices) |
|
(Zip code) |
(972) 987-3900
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer |
|
x |
|
Accelerated filer |
|
¨ |
|
|
|
|
|||
Non-accelerated filer |
|
¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company |
|
¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
The number of shares of the registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of November 4, 2014 was 47,583,612.
Table of Contents
|
|
Page |
|
|
-1- |
|
|
-1- |
Consolidated Condensed Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 |
|
-1- |
|
|
-3- |
|
|
-4- |
|
|
-5- |
|
|
-6- |
Item 2 – Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
|
-16- |
Item 3 – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk |
|
-26- |
|
|
-26- |
|
|
-27- |
|
|
-27- |
|
|
-27- |
Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
|
-28- |
|
|
-28- |
|
|
-28- |
|
|
-28- |
|
|
-29- |
|
|
-30- |
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands)
ASSETS
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
236,849 |
|
|
$ |
196,635 |
|
Short-term investments |
|
14,165 |
|
|
|
22,922 |
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
193,639 |
|
|
|
192,267 |
|
Inventories |
|
189,119 |
|
|
|
180,396 |
|
Deferred income taxes, current |
|
9,828 |
|
|
|
10,513 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other |
|
52,130 |
|
|
|
47,352 |
|
Total current assets |
|
695,730 |
|
|
|
650,085 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, net |
|
312,176 |
|
|
|
322,013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DEFERRED INCOME TAXES, non-current |
|
24,597 |
|
|
|
28,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
83,542 |
|
|
|
84,714 |
|
Intangible assets, net |
|
47,391 |
|
|
|
53,571 |
|
Other |
|
24,804 |
|
|
|
23,638 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
1,188,240 |
|
|
$ |
1,162,258 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
-1-
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS (continued)
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
|
(Unaudited) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lines of credit |
$ |
2,009 |
|
|
$ |
5,814 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
97,367 |
|
|
|
89,212 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
65,390 |
|
|
|
60,684 |
|
Income tax payable |
|
3,777 |
|
|
|
1,206 |
|
Total current liabilities |
|
168,543 |
|
|
|
156,916 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LONG-TERM DEBT, net of current portion |
|
147,533 |
|
|
|
182,799 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER LONG-TERM LIABILITIES |
|
78,134 |
|
|
|
78,866 |
|
Total liabilities |
|
394,210 |
|
|
|
418,581 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (See Note H) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diodes Incorporated stockholders' equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preferred stock - par value $1.00 per share; 1,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
Common stock - par value $0.66 2/3 per share; 70,000,000 shares authorized; 47,572,500 and 46,680,973 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively |
|
31,717 |
|
|
|
31,120 |
|
Additional paid-in capital |
|
305,143 |
|
|
|
289,668 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
473,342 |
|
|
|
426,328 |
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(58,847 |
) |
|
|
(44,374 |
) |
Total Diodes Incorporated stockholders' equity |
|
751,355 |
|
|
|
702,742 |
|
Noncontrolling interest |
|
42,675 |
|
|
|
40,935 |
|
Total equity |
|
794,030 |
|
|
|
743,677 |
|
Total liabilities and equity |
$ |
1,188,240 |
|
|
$ |
1,162,258 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
-2-
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
NET SALES |
$ |
233,777 |
|
|
$ |
224,510 |
|
|
$ |
666,980 |
|
|
$ |
615,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COST OF GOODS SOLD |
|
159,045 |
|
|
|
154,951 |
|
|
|
460,363 |
|
|
|
438,818 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross profit |
|
74,732 |
|
|
|
69,559 |
|
|
|
206,617 |
|
|
|
177,035 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
33,897 |
|
|
|
33,810 |
|
|
|
99,518 |
|
|
|
99,266 |
|
Research and development |
|
13,864 |
|
|
|
13,611 |
|
|
|
39,565 |
|
|
|
35,836 |
|
Other operating expenses |
|
1,967 |
|
|
|
1,876 |
|
|
|
5,044 |
|
|
|
7,657 |
|
Total operating expenses |
|
49,728 |
|
|
|
49,297 |
|
|
|
144,127 |
|
|
|
142,759 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
25,004 |
|
|
|
20,262 |
|
|
|
62,490 |
|
|
|
34,276 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSES) |
|
1,300 |
|
|
|
(2,768 |
) |
|
|
309 |
|
|
|
(1,970 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
26,304 |
|
|
|
17,494 |
|
|
|
62,799 |
|
|
|
32,306 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INCOME TAX PROVISION |
|
6,172 |
|
|
|
3,604 |
|
|
|
14,370 |
|
|
|
11,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME |
|
20,132 |
|
|
|
13,890 |
|
|
|
48,429 |
|
|
|
20,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: NET INCOME attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(1,415 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCOME attributable to common stockholders |
$ |
19,427 |
|
|
$ |
13,619 |
|
|
$ |
47,014 |
|
|
$ |
20,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EARNINGS PER SHARE attributable to common stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
Diluted |
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of shares used in computation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
47,548 |
|
|
|
46,605 |
|
|
|
47,047 |
|
|
|
46,260 |
|
Diluted |
|
48,736 |
|
|
|
48,023 |
|
|
|
48,385 |
|
|
|
47,584 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
-3-
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
Net income |
$ |
20,132 |
|
|
$ |
13,890 |
|
|
$ |
48,429 |
|
|
$ |
20,653 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Translation adjustment |
|
(8,788 |
) |
|
|
11,983 |
|
|
|
(8,933 |
) |
|
|
3,588 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized loss on defined benefit plan, net of tax |
|
(4,991 |
) |
|
|
(3,687 |
) |
|
|
(5,541 |
) |
|
|
(2,506 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
6,353 |
|
|
|
22,186 |
|
|
|
33,955 |
|
|
|
21,735 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
(705 |
) |
|
|
(271 |
) |
|
|
(1,415 |
) |
|
|
(325 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders |
$ |
5,648 |
|
|
$ |
21,915 |
|
|
$ |
32,540 |
|
|
$ |
21,410 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
-4-
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(In thousands)
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|||||
|
September 30, |
|
|||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
$ |
107,325 |
|
|
$ |
77,834 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition, net of cash acquired |
|
- |
|
|
|
(124,916 |
) |
Decrease in restricted cash |
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
6,949 |
|
Purchases of property, plant and equipment |
|
(37,081 |
) |
|
|
(30,780 |
) |
Proceeds from sales of property, plant and equipment |
|
1,428 |
|
|
|
58 |
|
Purchases of short-term investments |
|
- |
|
|
|
(21,690 |
) |
Proceeds from maturity of short-term investments |
|
8,516 |
|
|
|
- |
|
Purchases of equity securities |
|
(1,842 |
) |
|
|
(5,563 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of equity securities |
|
562 |
|
|
|
7,458 |
|
Other |
|
518 |
|
|
|
(958 |
) |
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
(26,621 |
) |
|
|
(169,442 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Advances on lines of credit |
|
6,120 |
|
|
|
10,196 |
|
Repayments on lines of credit |
|
(9,849 |
) |
|
|
(30,029 |
) |
Borrowings of long-term debt |
|
- |
|
|
|
181,000 |
|
Repayments of long-term debt |
|
(35,831 |
) |
|
|
(22,849 |
) |
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
5,729 |
|
|
|
2,300 |
|
Other |
|
(159 |
) |
|
|
(3,927 |
) |
Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities |
|
(33,990 |
) |
|
|
136,691 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EFFECT OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
(6,500 |
) |
|
|
2,010 |
|
INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS |
|
40,214 |
|
|
|
47,093 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period |
|
196,635 |
|
|
|
157,121 |
|
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period |
$ |
236,849 |
|
|
$ |
204,214 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment purchased on accounts payable |
$ |
(5,298 |
) |
|
$ |
2,656 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value of assets acquired |
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
247,012 |
|
Liabilities assumed |
|
- |
|
|
|
(92,277 |
) |
Cash acquired |
|
- |
|
|
|
(29,819 |
) |
Net assets acquired |
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
124,916 |
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated condensed financial statements.
-5-
DIODES INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE A – Nature of Operations, Basis of Presentation and Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Nature of Operations
Diodes Incorporated, together with its subsidiaries (collectively, the “Company”), is a leading global manufacturer and supplier of high-quality, application specific standard products within the broad discrete, logic and analog semiconductor markets, serving the consumer electronics, computing, communications, industrial and automotive markets throughout Asia, North America and Europe.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited consolidated condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“U.S.”) (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q. They do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. GAAP for complete financial statements. These consolidated condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments and accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations for the period presented have been included in the interim period. Operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for other interim periods or the year ending December 31, 2014. The consolidated condensed financial data at December 31, 2013 is derived from audited financial statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 27, 2014.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. As permitted under U.S. GAAP, interim accounting for certain expenses, including income taxes, are based on full year forecasts. For interim financial reporting purposes, income taxes are recorded based upon estimated annual effective income tax rates taking into consideration discrete items occurring in a quarter.
Certain prior year’s balances have been reclassified to conform to the current financial statement presentation.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In April 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-08, Presentation of Financial Statements (Topic 205) and Property, Plant, and Equipment (Topic 360): Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity. Under ASU 2014-08, only disposals that represent a strategic shift that has (or will have) a major effect on the entity’s results and operations would qualify as discontinued operations, which could include a disposal of a major geographical area, a major line of business, a major equity method investment, or other major parts of an entity. ASU 2014-08 also expands the disclosure requirements for disposals of operations to include more information about assets, liabilities, income and expenses and requires entities to disclose information about disposals of individually significant components. ASU 2014-08 is effective in the first quarter of 2015, with early adoption permitted and could impact the Company’s consolidated financial results in the event of a transaction as described above.
In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU 2014-09 is based on the principle that revenue is recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. ASU 2014-09 also requires additional disclosure about the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from customer contracts, including significant judgments and changes in judgments and assets recognized from costs incurred to obtain or fulfill a contract. ASU 2014-09 is effective in the first quarter of 2017, with early adoption not permitted and requires either a retrospective or a modified retrospective approach to adoption. The Company has not yet selected a transition method and is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
-6-
NOTE B – Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income attributable to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of shares of Common Stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated similarly but includes potential dilution from the exercise of stock options and stock awards, except when the effect would be anti-dilutive.
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per common share is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
BASIC |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share |
|
47,548 |
|
|
|
46,605 |
|
|
|
47,047 |
|
|
|
46,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ |
19,427 |
|
|
$ |
13,619 |
|
|
$ |
47,014 |
|
|
$ |
20,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to common stockholders |
$ |
0.41 |
|
|
$ |
0.29 |
|
|
$ |
1.00 |
|
|
$ |
0.44 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DILUTED |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding used in computing basic earnings per share |
|
47,548 |
|
|
|
46,605 |
|
|
|
47,047 |
|
|
|
46,260 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options and stock awards outstanding |
|
1,188 |
|
|
|
1,418 |
|
|
|
1,338 |
|
|
|
1,324 |
|
|
|
48,736 |
|
|
|
48,023 |
|
|
|
48,385 |
|
|
|
47,584 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
$ |
19,427 |
|
|
$ |
13,619 |
|
|
$ |
47,014 |
|
|
$ |
20,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings per share attributable to common stockholders |
$ |
0.40 |
|
|
$ |
0.28 |
|
|
$ |
0.97 |
|
|
$ |
0.43 |
|
NOTE C – Inventories
Inventories stated at the lower of cost or market value are as follows (in thousands):
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Raw materials |
$ |
75,281 |
|
|
$ |
69,878 |
|
Work-in-progress |
|
45,752 |
|
|
|
43,031 |
|
Finished goods |
|
68,086 |
|
|
|
67,487 |
|
Total |
$ |
189,119 |
|
|
$ |
180,396 |
|
NOTE D – Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Changes in goodwill are as follows (in thousands):
Balance at December 31, 2013 |
$ |
84,714 |
|
Translation adjustment |
|
(1,172 |
) |
Balance at September 30, 2014 |
$ |
83,542 |
|
-7-
Intangible assets are as follows (in thousands):
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Intangible assets subject to amortization: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
$ |
86,929 |
|
|
$ |
86,925 |
|
Accumulated amortization |
|
(38,208 |
) |
|
|
(32,245 |
) |
Translation adjustment |
|
(7,165 |
) |
|
|
(7,000 |
) |
Total |
|
41,556 |
|
|
|
47,680 |
|
Intangible assets with indefinite lives: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gross carrying amount |
|
6,403 |
|
|
|
6,403 |
|
Translation adjustment |
|
(568 |
) |
|
|
(512 |
) |
Total |
|
5,835 |
|
|
|
5,891 |
|
Total intangible assets, net |
$ |
47,391 |
|
|
$ |
53,571 |
|
Amortization expense related to intangible assets subject to amortization was approximately $2 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and approximately $6 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.
NOTE E – Income Tax Provision
Income tax expense of approximately $6 million and $4 million was recorded for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and income tax expense of approximately $14 million and $12 million was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. This resulted in an effective tax rate of 23% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, as compared to 36% in the same period last year and compared to 38% for the full year of 2013. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 includes a $4 million benefit for discrete items, primarily resulting from the conclusion of a tax audit and differences related to 2013 tax provision estimates compared to 2013 actual tax return items. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 includes a $6 million charge for discrete items, primarily resulting from the conclusion of a tax audit by the China tax authorities. The estimated annual tax rate for 2014 is expected to be approximately 29%, excluding discrete items. The Company’s effective tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, excluding discrete items, were lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, principally from the impact of income in lower-taxed jurisdictions.
For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company reported domestic and foreign pre-tax income/(loss) of approximately $(3) million and $29 million, respectively. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company reported domestic and foreign pre-tax income of approximately $1 million and $62 million, respectively. Funds repatriated from foreign subsidiaries to the U.S. may be subject to federal and state income taxes. The Company intends to permanently reinvest overseas all of its earnings from its foreign subsidiaries, except to the extent such undistributed earnings have previously been subject to U.S. tax; accordingly, deferred U.S. taxes are not recorded on undistributed foreign earnings.
The impact of tax holidays decreased the Company’s tax expense by approximately $3 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. The benefit of the tax holidays on both basic and diluted earnings per share for both the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $0.06.
The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and in various state and foreign jurisdictions. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2007, or for the 2010 tax year. The Company is no longer subject to China income tax examinations by tax authorities for tax years before 2004. With respect to state and local jurisdictions and countries outside of the U.S. (other than China), with limited exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to income tax audits for years before 2006. Although the outcome of tax audits is always uncertain, the Company believes that adequate amounts of tax, interest and penalties, if any, have been provided for in the Company’s reserve for any adjustments that may result from tax audits. The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense. As of September 30, 2014, the gross amount of unrecognized tax benefits was approximately $21 million.
It is reasonably possible that the amount of the unrecognized benefit with respect to certain of the Company’s unrecognized tax positions will significantly increase or decrease within the next 12 months. At this time, an estimate of the range of the reasonably possible outcomes cannot be made.
-8-
NOTE F – Share-Based Compensation
The following table shows the total compensation expensed for share-based compensation plans, including stock options and share grants, recognized in the statements of operations (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ |
114 |
|
|
$ |
136 |
|
|
$ |
317 |
|
|
$ |
385 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
3,311 |
|
|
|
2,958 |
|
|
|
9,119 |
|
|
|
8,679 |
|
Research and development |
|
313 |
|
|
|
398 |
|
|
|
891 |
|
|
|
989 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total share-based compensation expense |
$ |
3,738 |
|
|
$ |
3,492 |
|
|
$ |
10,327 |
|
|
$ |
10,053 |
|
Stock Options. Stock options generally vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period and expire eight years after the grant date, and expense was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model.
The total net cash proceeds received from stock option exercises during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was approximately $6 million. Stock option expense was approximately $1 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and $3 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.
A summary of the stock option grants is as follows:
Stock Options |
|
Shares (000) |
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price |
|
|
Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (yrs) |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000) |
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2014 |
|
|
3,126 |
|
|
$ |
18.93 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
17,461 |
|
Granted |
|
|
176 |
|
|
|
27.92 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised |
|
|
(548 |
) |
|
|
10.19 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9,689 |
|
Forfeited or expired |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
29.21 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2014 |
|
|
2,752 |
|
|
$ |
21.24 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
$ |
10,772 |
|
Exercisable at September 30, 2014 |
|
|
2,221 |
|
|
$ |
20.46 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
|
$ |
10,012 |
|
The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is before applicable income taxes and represents the amount option holders would have received if all options had been exercised on the last business day of the period indicated, based on the Company’s closing stock price.
As of September 30, 2014, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options, net of forfeitures, was approximately $6 million, before income taxes, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3 years.
Share Grants. Restricted stock awards and restricted stock units generally vest in equal annual installments over a four-year period.
Share grant expense for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 was approximately $3 million and $2 million, respectively, and approximately $8 million for both the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.
-9-
A summary of the Company’s non-vested share grants is as follows:
Share Grants |
|
Shares (000) |
|
|
Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value |
|
|
Aggregate Intrinsic Value ($000) |
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2014 |
|
|
1,131 |
|
|
$ |
22.35 |
|
|
$ |
26,656 |
|
Granted |
|
|
682 |
|
|
|
28.57 |
|
|
|
|
|
Vested |
|
|
(343 |
) |
|
|
22.37 |
|
|
|
9,920 |
|
Forfeited |
|
|
(30 |
) |
|
|
24.72 |
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2014 |
|
|
1,440 |
|
|
$ |
25.16 |
|
|
$ |
34,435 |
|
As of September 30, 2014, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock awards, net of forfeitures, was approximately $22 million, before income taxes, and is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 3 years.
-10-
NOTE G – Segment Information and Enterprise-Wide Disclosure
For financial reporting purposes, the Company operates in a single segment, standard semiconductor products, through the Company’s various manufacturing and distribution facilities. The Company aggregates its products because the products are similar and have similar economic characteristics, and the products are similar in production process and share the same customer type.
The Company’s primary operations include operations in Asia, North America and Europe.
Revenues are attributed to geographic areas based on the location of subsidiaries producing the revenues (in thousands):
Three Months Ended |
Asia |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||
September 30, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
$ |
217,304 |
|
|
$ |
40,371 |
|
|
$ |
46,421 |
|
|
$ |
304,096 |
|
Inter-company sales |
|
(31,437 |
) |
|
|
(17,021 |
) |
|
|
(21,861 |
) |
|
|
(70,319 |
) |
Net sales |
$ |
185,867 |
|
|
$ |
23,350 |
|
|
$ |
24,560 |
|
|
$ |
233,777 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
Asia |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||
September 30, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
$ |
205,505 |
|
|
$ |
37,017 |
|
|
$ |
50,041 |
|
|
$ |
292,563 |
|
Inter-company sales |
|
(22,856 |
) |
|
|
(15,561 |
) |
|
|
(29,636 |
) |
|
|
(68,053 |
) |
Net sales |
$ |
182,649 |
|
|
$ |
21,456 |
|
|
$ |
20,405 |
|
|
$ |
224,510 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Nine Months Ended |
Asia |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||
September 30, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
$ |
607,991 |
|
|
$ |
115,096 |
|
|
$ |
135,350 |
|
|
$ |
858,437 |
|
Inter-company sales |
|
(80,240 |
) |
|
|
(47,408 |
) |
|
|
(63,809 |
) |
|
|
(191,457 |
) |
Net sales |
$ |
527,751 |
|
|
$ |
67,688 |
|
|
$ |
71,541 |
|
|
$ |
666,980 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ |
263,769 |
|
|
$ |
27,444 |
|
|
$ |
20,963 |
|
|
$ |
312,176 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
872,475 |
|
|
$ |
128,430 |
|
|
$ |
187,335 |
|
|
$ |
1,188,240 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of and for the Nine Months Ended |
Asia |
|
|
North America |
|
|
Europe |
|
|
Consolidated |
|
||||
September 30, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total sales |
$ |
558,040 |
|
|
$ |
109,078 |
|
|
$ |
127,671 |
|
|
$ |
794,789 |
|
Inter-company sales |
|
(57,752 |
) |
|
|
(50,985 |
) |
|
|
(70,199 |
) |
|
|
(178,936 |
) |
Net sales |
$ |
500,288 |
|
|
$ |
58,093 |
|
|
$ |
57,472 |
|
|
$ |
615,853 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net |
$ |
274,630 |
|
|
$ |
30,240 |
|
|
$ |
23,932 |
|
|
$ |
328,802 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
859,322 |
|
|
$ |
149,820 |
|
|
$ |
192,978 |
|
|
$ |
1,202,120 |
|
-11-
Geographic Information
Revenues were derived from (shipped to) customers located in the following countries (in thousands):
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
for the Three Months |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||||||||||
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
China |
$ |
145,834 |
|
|
$ |
141,155 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
United States |
|
21,214 |
|
|
|
20,115 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Korea |
|
16,617 |
|
|
|
19,175 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Germany |
|
14,417 |
|
|
|
12,963 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Singapore |
|
12,397 |
|
|
|
10,483 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Taiwan |
|
8,962 |
|
|
|
9,235 |
|
|
|
4 |
% |
|
|
4 |
% |
All Others (1) |
|
14,336 |
|
|
|
11,384 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Total |
$ |
233,777 |
|
|
$ |
224,510 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
|
for the Nine Months |
|
|
Percentage of |
|
||||||||||
|
Ended September 30, |
|
|
Net Sales |
|
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
China |
$ |
412,994 |
|
|
$ |
387,912 |
|
|
|
62 |
% |
|
|
63 |
% |
United States |
|
62,620 |
|
|
|
54,136 |
|
|
|
9 |
% |
|
|
9 |
% |
Korea |
|
50,852 |
|
|
|
50,741 |
|
|
|
8 |
% |
|
|
8 |
% |
Germany |
|
45,616 |
|
|
|
36,254 |
|
|
|
7 |
% |
|
|
6 |
% |
Singapore |
|
34,513 |
|
|
|
32,202 |
|
|
|
5 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Taiwan |
|
22,543 |
|
|
|
21,151 |
|
|
|
3 |
% |
|
|
3 |
% |
All Others (1) |
|
37,842 |
|
|
|
33,457 |
|
|
|
6 |
% |
|
|
5 |
% |
Total |
$ |
666,980 |
|
|
$ |
615,853 |
|
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
(1) |
Represents countries with less than 3% of the total revenues each. |
NOTE H – Commitments and Contingencies
Purchase commitments – As of September 30, 2014, the Company had approximately $12 million in non-cancelable purchase contracts related to capital expenditures, primarily for manufacturing equipment in China.
Contingencies – From time to time, the Company may be involved in a variety of legal matters that arise in the normal course of business. Based on information available, the Company evaluates the likelihood of potential outcomes. The Company records the appropriate liability when it is considered probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. In addition, the Company does not accrue for estimated legal fees and other directly related costs as they are expensed as incurred.
On September 9, 2014, the United States District Court for the District of Delaware issued an order regarding the purported stockholder derivative action, entitled Scherer v. Keh-Shew Lu, Civil Action No. 1:13-cv-00358-UNA (D. Del. filed Mar. 5, 2013), granting in part plaintiff’s motion on attorneys’ fees in awarding plaintiff a total amount of $1,245,045. The Company believes that the entire amount of the awarded attorneys’ fees is covered by the Company’s liability insurance. On September 23, 2014, the Company filed a notice of appeal from the order to the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.
On September 15, 2014, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an order regarding the putative securities class action, entitled Local 731 I.B. of T. Excavators and Pavers Pension Trust Fund v. Diodes, Inc., Civil Action No. 6:13-cv-00247 (E.D. Tex. filed Mar. 15, 2013) (the “Class Action”), granting defendants’ motion to dismiss the Class Action with prejudice. On October 13, 2014, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal to the order dismissing the Class Action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. The defendants intend to continue defend this action vigorously.
-12-
On February 20, 2014, a purported stockholder derivative action was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, entitled Persson v. Keh-Shew Lu, Case No. 4:14-cv-00108-RC-ALM (E.D. Tex. filed Feb. 20, 2014), on behalf of the Company against its directors, in which plaintiff alleges that the directors breached their fiduciary duties by allowing the Company to make allegedly misleading public statements in 2011 regarding the labor market in China and its impact on the Company’s business and prospects, by failing to maintain internal controls and by selling shares of Diodes stock while allegedly in possession of material nonpublic information regarding the labor market in China and its impact on the Company’s business and prospects. The complaint does not seek any damages or other relief from the Company. On April 17, 2014, the Court granted the parties’ unopposed motion to stay this action until such time that the Court rules on defendants’ motion to dismiss in the Class Action. On October 2, 2014, the Court granted the parties’ unopposed motion to extend the stay of this action until 30 days after either the expiration of the appeal period or a final decision by the highest court of appeals regarding the defendants’ motion to dismiss in the Class Action. The defendants intend to defend the action vigorously.
NOTE I – Employee Benefit Plans
Defined Benefit Plan
The Company has a contributory defined benefit plan that covers certain employees in the United Kingdom (“U.K.”). The net pension and supplemental retirement benefit obligations and the related periodic costs are based on, among other things, assumptions regarding the discount rate, estimated return on plan assets and mortality rates. These obligations and related periodic costs are measured using actuarial techniques and assumptions. The projected unit credit method is the actuarial cost method used to compute the pension liabilities and related expenses.
Net periodic benefit costs associated with the defined benefit plan were approximately $0 million for both the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and $1 million and $0 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively.
The following tables set forth the benefit obligation, the fair value of plan assets, and the funded status of the Company’s plan (in thousands):
|
Defined Benefit Plan |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in benefit obligation: |
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2013 |
$ |
149,316 |
|
Service cost |
|
250 |
|
Interest cost |
|
5,108 |
|
Actuarial loss |
|
9,468 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
(3,443 |
) |
Currency changes |
|
(3,474 |
) |
Benefit obligation at September 30, 2014 |
$ |
157,225 |
|
Change in plan assets: |
|
|
|
Fair value of plan assets at December 31, 2013 |
$ |
116,568 |
|
Actual return on plan assets |
|
8,169 |
|
Employer contribution |
|
334 |
|
Benefits paid |
|
(3,443 |
) |
Currency changes |
|
(2,602 |
) |
Fair value of plan assets at September 30, 2014 |
$ |
119,026 |
|
Underfunded status at September 30, 2014 |
$ |
(38,199 |
) |
Based on an actuarial study performed as of September 30, 2014, the plan is underfunded and a liability is reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a long-term liability. The weighted-average discount rate assumption used to determine benefit obligations as of September 30, 2014 was 4.1%.
-13-
The following weighted-average assumptions were used to determine net periodic benefit costs for the nine months ended September 30, 2014:
Discount rate |
|
4.6 |
% |
Expected long-term return on plan assets |
|
5.9 |
% |
During the second quarter of 2012, the Company adopted a payment plan with the trustees of the defined benefit plan, in which the Company will pay approximately ₤2 million British Pound Sterling (“GBP”) (approximately $3 million based on a USD:GBP exchange rate of 1.6:1) every year from 2012 through 2019. As part of the required pension review, which occurs every three years under the U.K. pension regulations, the Company is currently in discussions with the trustees regarding future contributions for the pension scheme.
The Company also has pension plans in Germany and Asia for which the benefit obligation, fair value of the plan assets and the funded status amounts are deemed immaterial and therefore, are not included in the figures or assumptions above.
Deferred Compensation
The Company maintains a Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Deferred Compensation Plan”) for executive officers, key employees and members of the Board of Directors (the “Board”). The Deferred Compensation Plan allows eligible participants to defer the receipt of eligible compensation, including equity awards, until designated future dates. The Company offsets its obligations under the Deferred Compensation Plan by investing in the actual underlying investments. These investments are classified as trading securities and are carried at fair value. At September 30, 2014, these investments totaled approximately $5 million. All gains and losses in these investments are materially offset by corresponding gains and losses in the Deferred Compensation Plan liabilities.
NOTE J – Related Parties
The Company conducts business with three related companies: Lite-On Semiconductor Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, “LSC”), Keylink International (B.V.I.) Inc. and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, “Keylink”) and Nuvoton Technology Corporation and its subsidiaries and affiliates (collectively, “Nuvoton”). LSC owned approximately 17% of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock as of September 30, 2014. Keylink is the Company’s 5% joint venture partner in two of the Company’s Shanghai manufacturing facilities. A member of the Company’s Board of Directors who is also the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer is a member of the Board of Directors of Nuvoton. In addition, another member of the Company’s Board of Directors is a Supervisor of the Board of Directors of Nuvoton.
The Audit Committee of the Company’s Board reviews all related party arrangements for potential conflict of interest situations on an ongoing basis, in accordance with such procedures as the Audit Committee may adopt from time to time.
Lite-On Semiconductor Corporation – The Company sells semiconductor products to LSC and purchases semiconductor products from LSC for subsequent sale, making LSC one of the Company’s largest suppliers.
Net sales to, and purchases from, LSC are as follows (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
Net sales |
$ |
294 |
|
|
$ |
190 |
|
|
$ |
573 |
|
|
$ |
589 |
|
Purchases |
$ |
8,735 |
|
|
$ |
10,731 |
|
|
$ |
24,447 |
|
|
$ |
27,890 |
|
Keylink International (B.V.I.) Inc. – The Company sells semiconductor products to Keylink and purchases semiconductor products for subsequent sale. In addition, two of the Company’s subsidiaries in China lease their manufacturing facilities from, and subcontract a portion of their manufacturing process (including, but not limited to, metal plating and environmental services) to Keylink. The Company also pays a consulting fee to Keylink. The aggregate amounts for these services for both the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $5 million. The aggregate amounts for these services for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were approximately $14 million and $13 million, respectively.
-14-
Net sales to, and purchases from, Keylink are as follows (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
Net sales |
$ |
2,830 |
|
|
$ |
2,638 |
|
|
$ |
7,210 |
|
|
$ |
8,387 |
|
Purchases |
$ |
2,483 |
|
|
$ |
2,290 |
|
|
$ |
6,199 |
|
|
$ |
5,956 |
|
Nuvoton Technology Corporation – The Company purchases wafers from Nuvoton that it uses in the production of finished goods.
Net purchases from Nuvoton are as follows (in thousands):
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
||||||||||
|
September 30, |
|
|
September 30, |
|
||||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||||
Purchases |
$ |
3,652 |
|
|
$ |
2,897 |
|
|
$ |
10,225 |
|
|
$ |
7,992 |
|
Accounts receivable from, and accounts payable to, LSC, Keylink and Nuvoton are as follows (in thousands):
|
September 30, |
|
|
December 31, |
|
||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Accounts receivable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSC |
$ |
291 |
|
|
$ |
140 |
|
Keylink |
|
4,211 |
|
|
|
4,927 |
|
|
$ |
4,502 |
|
|
$ |
5,067 |
|
Accounts payable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LSC |
$ |
6,593 |
|
|
$ |
5,670 |
|
Keylink |
|
7,222 |
|
|
|
6,505 |
|
Nuvoton |
|
1,266 |
|
|
|
770 |
|
|
$ |
15,081 |
|
|
$ |
12,945 |
|
-15-
Item 2—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Item 2 constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended and as identified under the heading “Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995” herein. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed below under the heading “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by the Company’s management. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) provides certain “safe harbor” provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made pursuant to the Act. The Company undertakes no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to its forward-looking statements that may be made to reflect events or circumstances after the date hereof or to reflect the occurrence of unexpected events. Unless the context otherwise requires, the words “Diodes,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Diodes Incorporated and its subsidiaries.
This management’s discussion should be read in conjunction with the management’s discussion included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, previously filed with Securities and Exchange Commission. (Amounts are rounded to the nearest million).
Highlights
|
Net sales for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was approximately $234 million, an increase of $9 million, or 4%, over the same period last year, and a sequential increase of 5% compared to the $223 million in the second quarter of 2014; |
|
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was approximately $667 million, an increase of $51 million, or 8%, over the same period last year; |
|
Gross profit for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was approximately $75 million, an increase of $5 million, or 7%, over the same period last year, and a sequential increase of 6% compared to the $70 million in the second quarter of 2014; |
|
Gross profit for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was approximately $207 million, an increase of $30 million, or 17%, over the same period last year; |
|
Gross profit margin for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was 32%, compared to 31% in the same period last year, and 32% in the second quarter of 2014; |
|
Gross profit margin for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was 31%, compared to 29% in the same period last year; |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was approximately $19 million, or $0.40 per diluted share, compared to net income attributable to common stockholders of $14 million, or $0.28 per diluted share, in the same period last year, and net income attributable to common stockholders of $17 million, or $0.36 per diluted share, in the second quarter of 2014; |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was approximately $47 million, or $0.97 per diluted share, compared to net income attributable to common stockholders of $20 million, or $0.43 per diluted share, in the same period last year; and |
|
Cash flows from operating activities was approximately $107 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. |
Overview
We are a leading global manufacturer and supplier of high-quality, application specific standard products within the broad discrete, logic and analog semiconductor markets, serving the consumer electronics, computing, communications, industrial and automotive markets. Our products are sold primarily throughout Asia, North America and Europe.
We design, manufacture and market semiconductors for diverse end-use applications. Semiconductors, which provide electronic signal amplification and switching functions, are basic building-block electronic components that are incorporated into almost every electronic device. We believe that our focus on application-specific standard products utilizing innovative, highly efficient packaging and cost-effective process technologies, coupled with our collaborative, customer-focused product development, provides us with a meaningful competitive advantage relative to other semiconductor companies.
-16-
First Three Quarters of 2014
For the first quarter of 2014, revenue was essentially flat despite the Chinese New Year slowdown due to shipping inventory that we had strategically built-up during the fourth quarter of 2013. Most notably, gross margin improved by 50 basis points sequentially and 320 basis points year-over-year as a result of improved wafer fabrication performance, especially at BCD’s Fab 2 where the ramp-up is going smoothly, combined with an overall improvement in product mix. Also during the quarter, we improved our balance sheet by reducing long-term debt by approximately $17 million, which followed a reduction of almost $20 million in the previous quarter. We generated approximately $46 million of cash flow from operations while reducing inventory and capital expenditure spending. During the first quarter, we experienced a rebound in Europe after a soft fourth quarter of 2013, while North America also showed some strength. Our strongest end-markets in the quarter were the automotive and industrial markets, largely offset by the computing and communications end-markets.
For the second quarter of 2014, financial results were at the upper end of our guidance. Revenue grew over 6% sequentially and gross profit reached a quarterly record reflecting our improved product mix and increased capacity utilization. Our achievement of almost 32% gross margin was the highest level since the second quarter of 2011. During the quarter, North America and Europe were stronger than expected, which contributed to further gains in industrial end-markets. These regions have solid product mix distribution due to the end-markets and customers we serve in these geographies. Our strongest end-market in the quarter was industrial primarily due to strength in North America and Europe, as well as communications as a result of continued gains in smartphones and smartphone chargers. In addition, we had a strong quarter in automotive and better than expected results in computing.
For the third quarter of 2014, we achieved another quarter of solid financial results, highlighted by record revenue and record gross profit. Growth was driven by continued strength in the consumer, communications and computing markets in Asia. Additionally, ongoing improvement in product mix and assembly/test capacity utilization contributed to gross margin reaching 32% for the first time since the second quarter of 2011. Earnings per share also reached the highest level in three years, demonstrating the Company’s strong operating performance. Revenue reached a record and was up 5% quarter over quarter driven primarily by strength in consumer, computing and communications end-markets in Asia.
Business Outlook
For the fourth quarter of 2014, we expect revenue to range between $217 million and $231 million, or down 7% to 1% sequentially due to normal seasonality. We expect gross margin to be 31.6%, plus or minus 2%. Operating expenses are expected to be approximately 22.2% of revenue, plus or minus 1%. We expect our income tax rate to be 25%, plus or minus 3%, and shares used to calculate diluted earnings per share for the fourth quarter are anticipated to be approximately 49.0 million.
Factors Relevant to Our Results of Operations
The following has affected, and, we believe, will continue to affect, our results of operations:
|
Net sales for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $667 million, compared to $616 million in the same period last year. This increase in net sales mainly reflects the inclusion of 9 months of BCD revenue in 2014 compared to 7 months in 2013, an increase in units sold and an increase in average selling price (“ASP”). |
|
Our gross profit margin was 31% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 29% in the same period last year. Our gross margin percentage increased over the same period last year due primarily to improved wafer fabrication performance and improved product mix. Future gross profit margins will depend primarily on market prices, our product mix, manufacturing cost savings, and the demand for our products. |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, the percentage of our net sales derived from our Asian subsidiaries was approximately 79% and 81%, respectively. Europe accounted for approximately 11% of our revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 9% in the same period last year. In addition, North America accounted for approximately 10% of our revenues for both the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. |
|
Since inception, we have invested over $500 million in our manufacturing facilities in Asia, including costs for acquisitions. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we invested approximately $38 million in these manufacturing facilities, and we expect to continue to invest in our manufacturing facilities, although the amount to be invested will depend on, among other factors, product demand and new product developments. |
|
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, our OEM and electronic manufacturing services (“EMS”) customers together accounted for approximately 32% of our net sales, while our global network of distributors accounted for approximately 68% of our net sales. Compared to prior years, the percentage of net sales to our global network of distributors has increased mainly due to acquisitions in which the majority of the net sales of the acquired companies are to distributors. |
-17-
Results of Operations for the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
The following table sets forth the percentage that certain items in the statements of operations bear to net sales and the percentage dollar increase (decrease) of such items from period to period.
|
Percent of Net Sales |
|
|
Percentage Dollar |
|
||||||
|
Three Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
'13 to '14 |
|
|||
Net sales |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
4 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
(68 |
) |
|
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
2 |
|
Gross profit |
|
32 |
|
|
|
31 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
(21 |
) |
|
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Income from operations |
|
11 |
|
|
|
9 |
|
|
|
23 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
- |
|
|
|
(1 |
) |
|
|
(147 |
) |
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
11 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
|
|
50 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
(3 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
71 |
|
Net income |
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
45 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
160 |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
43 |
|
The following discussion explains in greater detail our consolidated operating results and financial condition for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2013. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated condensed financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report (in thousands).
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Net Sales |
$ |
233,777 |
|
|
$ |
224,510 |
|
Net sales increased approximately $9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period last year. The 4% increase in net sales represented a 4% increase in units sold and a 1% increase in ASP. The revenue increase for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was mainly attributable to increased units sold and increased revenue in our end-markets in North America and Europe, which tend to have higher ASP.
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Cost of goods sold |
$ |
159,045 |
|
|
$ |
154,951 |
|
Gross profit |
$ |
74,732 |
|
|
$ |
69,559 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
32 |
% |
|
|
31 |
% |
Cost of goods sold increased approximately $4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period last year. As a percent of sales, cost of goods sold decreased to 68% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 69% in the same period last year, and average unit cost (“AUP”) was relatively flat.
For the three months ended September 30, 2014, gross profit increased by approximately $5 million, or 7%, compared to the same period last year. Gross margin increased to 32% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 31% for the same period last year. This increase is mainly due to improved wafer fabrication performance and improved product mix.
-18-
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Operating expenses |
$ |
49,728 |
|
|
$ |
49,297 |
|
Operating expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2014 remained relatively flat compared to the same period last year. Each of the components within operating expenses, selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”), research and development expenses (“R&D”), and other operating expenses, remained relatively flat. SG&A, as a percentage of sales, was 15% for both the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. R&D, as a percentage of sales, was 6% for both the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013.
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Other income |
$ |
1,300 |
|
|
$ |
(2,768 |
) |
Other income for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to foreign currency gains, interest income and gain on securities carried at fair value, partially offset by interest expense. Other expense for the three months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily due to foreign currency losses and interest expense, substantially offset by interest income.
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Income tax provision |
$ |
6,172 |
|
|
$ |
3,604 |
|
We recognized income tax expense of approximately $6 million for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and $4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013. The effective tax rate is 24% for the three months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 21% in the same period last year. The increase in income taxes for 2014 compared to 2013 is a result of increased earnings in higher tax jurisdictions. Our effective tax rates for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, excluding discrete items, were lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, principally as a result of income in lower-taxed jurisdictions.
Results of Operations for the Nine months Ended September 30, 2014 and 2013
The following table sets forth the percentage that certain items in the statements of operations bear to net sales and the percentage dollar increase (decrease) of such items from period to period.
|
Percent of Net Sales |
|
|
Percentage Dollar |
|
||||||
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|
Increase (Decrease) |
|
||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
'13 to '14 |
|
|||
Net sales |
|
100 |
% |
|
|
100 |
% |
|
|
8 |
|
Cost of goods sold |
|
(69 |
) |
|
|
(71 |
) |
|
|
5 |
|
Gross profit |
|
31 |
|
|
|
29 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
Operating expenses |
|
(22 |
) |
|
|
(23 |
) |
|
|
1 |
|
Income from operations |
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
82 |
|
Other income (expense) |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
(116 |
) |
Income before income taxes and noncontrolling interest |
|
9 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
|
|
94 |
|
Income tax provision |
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
(2 |
) |
|
|
23 |
|
Net income |
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
135 |
|
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
|
- |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
335 |
|
Net income attributable to common stockholders |
|
7 |
|
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
131 |
|
The following discussion explains in greater detail our consolidated operating results and financial condition for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2013. This discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated condensed financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report (in thousands).
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Net Sales |
$ |
666,980 |
|
|
$ |
615,853 |
|
-19-
Net sales increased approximately $51 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period last year. The 8% increase in net sales represented an approximately 4% increase in ASP and a 4% increase in units sold. The revenue increase for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was mainly attributable to increased units sold, increased revenue in our-end markets in North America and Europe, which tend to have higher ASP and the inclusion of BCD revenue for the full nine months compared to seven months in 2013.
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Cost of goods sold |
$ |
460,363 |
|
|
$ |
438,818 |
|
Gross profit |
$ |
206,617 |
|
|
$ |
177,035 |
|
Gross profit margin |
|
31 |
% |
|
|
29 |
% |
Cost of goods sold increased approximately $22 million, or 5%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to the same period last year. As a percent of sales, cost of goods sold decreased to 68% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 69% in the same period last year, and AUP increased by 1%.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, gross profit increased by approximately $30 million, or 17%, compared to the same period last year. Gross margin increased to 31% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 29% for the same period last year. This increase is mainly due to improved wafer fabrication performance and improved product mix.
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Operating expenses |
$ |
144,127 |
|
|
$ |
142,759 |
|
Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 increased approximately $2 million compared to the same period last year. Of the components within operating expenses, SG&A remained relatively flat, and R&D increased approximately $4 million. SG&A, as a percentage of sales, decreased to 15% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to 16% in the same period last year, and R&D, as a percentage of sales, remained relatively flat at 6% for both the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. SG&A for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 had increased salary and wages due to the acquisition of BCD in 2013, offset by reduction in professional fees. R&D for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 increased primarily due to an increase in salary and wages due to increase in headcount and the acquisition of BCD in 2013. Also included in other operating expenses was a gain on sale of assets of $1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and a restructuring charge of $2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Other income (expense) |
$ |
309 |
|
|
$ |
(1,970 |
) |
Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was negligible and other expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was $2 million. Other income for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was primarily due to interest income and foreign currency gains, partially offset by interest expense. Other expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was primarily due to interest expense, partially offset by interest income.
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
||
Income tax provision |
$ |
14,370 |
|
|
$ |
11,653 |
|
We recognized income tax expense of approximately $14 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and $12 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. The effective tax rate is approximately 23% for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to approximately 36% in the same period last year. Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was impacted by a $4 million tax benefit for discrete items, primarily resulting from the conclusion of a tax audit and differences related to 2013 tax provision estimates compared to 2013 actual tax return items. Income tax expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2013 was impacted by $5 million additional tax expense in regard to a tax audit by the China tax authorities, which was treated as a discrete item. Our effective tax rates for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, excluding discrete items, were lower than the U.S. statutory tax rate of 35%, principally from the impact of income in lower-taxed jurisdictions.
-20-
Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash and cash equivalents, funds from operations and, if necessary, borrowings under our credit facilities. We currently have a U.S. credit agreement consisting of a $300 million revolving senior credit facility (the “Revolver”), which includes a $10 million swing line sublimit, a $10 million letter of credit sublimit, and a $20 million alternative currency sublimit. The Revolver matures on January 8, 2018, and as of September 30, 2014, $145 million was outstanding. In addition, we have foreign credit facilities with borrowing capacities of approximately $98 million with $2 million in outstanding borrowings and $6 million used for import and export guarantees and bank acceptance notes. We also have foreign long-term debt of approximately $3 million. Our primary liquidity requirements have been to meet our inventory and capital expenditure needs and to fund on-going operations. At December 31, 2013 and September 30, 2014 our working capital was $493 million and $527 million, respectively. We expect cash generated by our operations together with existing cash, cash equivalents, short-term investments and available credit facilities to be sufficient to cover cash needs for working capital and capital expenditures for at least the next 12 months.
Capital expenditures for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were $42 million and $33 million, respectively. For the first nine months of 2014 capital expenditures were approximately 6% of our net sales, which is within our capital spending target range of 5% to 9% of net sales.
We intend to permanently reinvest overseas all of our earnings from our foreign subsidiaries, except to the extent such undistributed earnings have previously been subject to U.S. tax. Accordingly, deferred U.S. taxes are not recorded on undistributed foreign earnings. As of September 30, 2014, our foreign subsidiaries held approximately $243 million of cash, cash equivalents and investments of which approximately $190 million would be subject to a potential tax if repatriated to the U.S.
As of September 30, 2014, we had short-term investments totaling $14 million. These investments are highly liquid with maturity dates greater than three months at the date of purchase. We generally can access these investments in a relatively short amount of time but in doing so we generally forfeit all earned and future interest income.
Discussion of Cash Flow
Cash and cash equivalents increased from $197 million at December 31, 2013 to $237 million at September 30, 2014 primarily from cash provided by operating activities, partially offset by cash used by investing activities and financing activities.
A summary of the consolidated condensed statements of cash flows is as follows (in thousands):
|
Nine Months Ended September 30, |
|
|||||||||
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
Change |
|
|||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ |
107,325 |
|
|
$ |
77,834 |
|
|
$ |
29,491 |
|
Net cash used by investing activities |
|
(26,621 |
) |
|
|
(169,442 |
) |
|
|
142,821 |
|
Net cash provided by (used by) financing activities |
|
(33,990 |
) |
|
|
136,691 |
|
|
|
(170,681 |
) |
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents |
|
(6,500 |
) |
|
|
2,010 |
|
|
|
(8,510 |
) |
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
40,214 |
|
|
$ |
47,093 |
|
|
$ |
(6,879 |
) |
Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $107 million, resulting primarily from $48 million of net income, $57 million in depreciation and amortization, $10 million of non-cash share-based compensation expense, an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, offset partially by an increase in inventories and prepaid expenses and other. Net cash provided by operating activities was $78 million for the same period last year, resulting primarily from $21 million in net income, $55 million in depreciation and amortization, $10 million of non-cash share-based compensation expense and changes in assets and liabilities.
Investing Activities
Net cash used by investing activities was $27 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to net cash used by investing activities of $169 million for the same period last year. This decrease in net cash used was primarily due to approximately $125 million for the acquisition of BCD, net of cash acquired for the nine months ended September 30, 2013.
-21-
Financing Activities
Net cash used by financing activities was $34 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, compared to net cash provided by financing activities of $137 million in the same period last year. Net cash used in 2014 consisted primarily of repayments on lines of credit and long-term debt, offset partially by advances on lines of credit and proceeds from issuance of common stock. Net cash provided by in 2013 consisted primarily of $181 million drawn down on our five-year $300 million revolving senior credit facility, offset by repayments on lines of credit.
Debt Instruments
There have been no material changes to our debt instruments as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 27, 2014.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any transactions, arrangements and other relationships with unconsolidated entities that will affect our liquidity or capital resources. We have no special purpose entities that provide off-balance sheet financing, liquidity or market or credit risk support, nor do we engage in leasing, swap agreements, or outsourcing of research and development services, that could expose us to liability that is not reflected on the face of our financial statements.
Contractual Obligations
There have been no material changes in any of our contractual obligations as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 27, 2014.
Critical Accounting Policies
Our critical accounting policies, as described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, relate to revenue recognition, inventories, accounting for income taxes, goodwill and other indefinite lived assets, share-based compensation, fair value measurements, defined benefit plan and contingencies. There have been no material changes to our critical accounting policies as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 27, 2014.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
See Note A of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for detailed information regarding the status of recently issued accounting pronouncements.
Available Information
Our Internet address is http://www.diodes.com. We make available, free of charge through our Internet website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”) as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is electronically filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our website also provides access to investor financial information, including SEC filings and press releases, as well as stock quotes and information on corporate governance compliance.
Cautionary Statement for Purposes of the “Safe Harbor” Provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995
Except for the historical information contained herein, the matters addressed in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. We generally identify forward-looking statements by the use of terminology such as “may,” “will,” “could,” “should,” “potential,” “continue,” “expect,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe,” or similar phrases or the negatives of such terms. Such forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties, including those discussed under “Risks Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by our management. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (the “Act”) provides certain “safe harbor” provisions for forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements made in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made pursuant to the Act.
-22-
All forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are subject to, in addition to the other matters described in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, a variety of significant risks and uncertainties. The following discussion highlights some of these risks and uncertainties. Further, from time to time, information provided by us or statements made by our employees may contain forward-looking information. There can be no assurance that actual results or business conditions will not differ materially from those set forth or suggested in such forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed below.
For more detailed discussion of these factors, see the “Risk Factors” discussion in Item 1A of the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC and in Part II, Item 1A of this report. The forward-looking statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q are made only as of the date of this report, and the Company undertakes no obligation to update the forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances.
Risk Factors
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
· |
The success of our business depends on the strength of the global economy and the stability of the financial markets, and any weaknesses in these areas may have a material adverse effect on our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
During times of difficult market conditions, our fixed costs combined with lower revenues and lower profit margins may have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
Downturns in the highly cyclical semiconductor industry and/or changes in end-market demand could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
The semiconductor business is highly competitive, and increased competition may harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
One of our largest external suppliers is also a related party. The loss of this supplier could harm our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
Delays in initiation of production at facilities due to implementing new production techniques or resolving problems associated with technical equipment malfunctions could adversely affect our manufacturing efficiencies, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We are and will continue to be under continuous pressure from our customers and competitors to reduce the price of our products, which could adversely affect our growth and profit margins. |
· |
Our customers require our products to undergo a lengthy and expensive qualification process without any assurance of product sales and may demand to audit our operations from time to time, the failure of which could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
Our customer orders are subject to cancellation or modification usually with no penalty. High volumes of order cancellation or reduction in quantities ordered could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
Production at our manufacturing facilities could be disrupted for a variety of reasons, including natural disasters and other extraordinary events, which could prevent us from producing enough of our products to maintain our sales and satisfy our customers’ demands and could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
New technologies could result in the development of new products by our competitors and a decrease in demand for our products, and we may not be able to develop new products to satisfy changes in demand, which would adversely affect our net sales, market share, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We may be adversely affected by any disruption in our information technology systems, which could adversely affect our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We may be subject to claims of infringement of third-party intellectual property rights or demands that we license third-party technology, which could result in significant expense, reduction in our intellectual property rights and a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We depend on third-party suppliers for timely deliveries of raw materials, parts and equipment, as well as finished products from other manufacturers, and our reputation with customers, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected if we are unable to obtain adequate supplies in a timely manner. |
-23-
· |
If we do not succeed in continuing to vertically integrate our business, we will not realize the cost and other efficiencies we anticipate, which could adversely affect our ability to compete, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
Part of our growth strategy involves identifying and acquiring companies with complementary product lines or customers. We may be unable to identify suitable acquisition candidates or consummate desired acquisitions and, if we do make any acquisitions, we may be unable to successfully integrate any acquired companies with our operations, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We are subject to litigation risks, including securities class action litigation, which may be costly to defend and the outcome of which is uncertain and could adversely affect our business and financial condition. |
· |
We are subject to many environmental laws and regulations that could result in significant expenses and could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
Our products may be found to be defective and, as a result, warranty claims and product liability claims may be asserted against us, which may harm our business, reputation with our customers, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We may fail to attract or retain the qualified technical, sales, marketing, finance and management personnel required to operate our business successfully, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We may not be able to achieve future growth, and any such growth may place a strain on our management and on our systems and resources, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
Obsolete inventories as a result of changes in demand for our products and change in life cycles of our products could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
If OEMs do not design our products into their applications, our net sales may be adversely affected. |
· |
We are subject to interest rate risk that could have an adverse effect on our cost of working capital and interest expenses, which could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We may have a significant amount of debt with various financial institutions worldwide. Any indebtedness could adversely affect our business, results of operations, financial condition and our ability to meet our payment obligations under such debt. |
· |
Restrictions in our credit facilities may limit our business and financial activities, including our ability to obtain additional capital in the future. |
· |
Our business benefits from certain Chinese government incentives. Expiration of, or changes to, these incentives could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We operate a global business through numerous foreign subsidiaries, and there is a risk that tax authorities will challenge our transfer pricing methodologies and/or legal entity structures, which could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
The value of our benefit plan assets and liabilities is based on estimates and assumptions, which may prove inaccurate and the actual amount of expenses recorded in the consolidated financial statements could differ materially from the assumptions used. |
· |
Changes in the United Kingdom’s equity or bond markets or in actuarial assumptions for our United Kingdom defined benefit pension plan could increase the volatility of the plan’s assets and liabilities, and could require us to increase cash contributions to the plan, which could have a negative impact on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
Certain of our customers and suppliers require us to comply with their codes of conduct, which may include certain restrictions that may substantially increase the cost of our business as well as have an adverse effect on our operating efficiencies, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
Compliance with government regulations and customer demands regarding the use of “conflict minerals” may result in increased costs and may have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
There are risks associated with previous and future acquisitions. We may ultimately not be successful in overcoming these risks or any other problems encountered in connection with acquisitions. |
· |
If we fail to maintain an effective system of internal controls or discover material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting, we may not be able to report our financial results accurately or detect fraud, which could harm our business and the trading price of our Common Stock. |
-24-
· |
Terrorist attacks, or threats or occurrences of other terrorist activities, whether in the United States or internationally, may affect the markets in which our Common Stock trades, the markets in which we operate and our results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
System security risks, data protection breaches, cyber-attacks and other related cybersecurity issues could disrupt our internal operations, and any such disruption could reduce our expected revenue, increase our expenses, damage our reputation and adversely affect our stock price. |
RISKS RELATED TO OUR INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS
· |
Our international operations subject us to risks that could adversely affect our operations. |
· |
We have significant operations and assets in China, the United Kingdom, Germany, Hong Kong and Taiwan and, as a result, will be subject to risks inherent in doing business in those jurisdictions, which may adversely affect our financial performance and results of operations. |
· |
A slowdown in the Chinese economy could limit the growth in demand for electronic devices containing our products, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and prospects. |
· |
Economic regulation in China could materially and adversely affect our business, results of operations and prospects. |
· |
We could be adversely affected by violations of the United States’ Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom’s Bribery Act 2010 and similar worldwide anti-bribery laws. |
· |
We are subject to foreign currency risk as a result of our international operations. |
· |
China is experiencing rapid social, political and economic change, which has increased labor costs and other related costs that could make doing business in China less advantageous than in prior years. Increased labor costs in China could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition. |
· |
We may not continue to receive preferential tax treatment in Asia, thereby increasing our income tax expense and reducing our net income. |
· |
The distribution of any earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to the United States may be subject to United States income taxes, thus reducing our net income. |
RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK
· |
Variations in our quarterly operating results may cause our stock price to be volatile. |
· |
We may enter into future acquisitions and take certain actions in connection with such acquisitions that could adversely affect the price of our Common Stock. |
· |
Our directors, executive officers and significant stockholders hold a substantial portion of our Common Stock, which may lead to conflicts with other stockholders over corporate transactions and other corporate matters. |
· |
We were formed in 1959, and our early corporate records are incomplete. As a result, we may have difficulty in assessing and defending against claims relating to rights to our Common Stock purporting to arise during periods for which our records are incomplete. |
· |
Non-cash tender offers, debt equity swaps or equity exchanges to consummate our business activities are likely to have the effect of diluting the ownership interest of existing stockholders, including qualified stockholders who receive shares of our Common Stock in such business activities. |
· |
Anti-takeover effects of certain provisions of Delaware law and our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws, may hinder a take-over attempt. |
· |
Section 203 of Delaware General Corporation Law may deter a take-over attempt. |
· |
Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaw provisions may deter a take-over attempt. |
-25-
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
As a multinational corporation, we are subject to certain market risks including foreign currency, interest rate, political instability, inflation and credit. We consider a variety of practices to manage these market risks. There have been no material changes to our market risks as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 27, 2014.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our Chief Executive Officer, Keh-Shew Lu, and Chief Financial Officer, Richard D. White, with the participation of the Company’s management, carried out an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(e). Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer believe that, as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, our disclosure controls and procedures are effective at the reasonable assurance level to ensure that information required to be included in this report is:
· |
recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the Commission’s rules and forms; and |
· |
accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions on required disclosure. |
Disclosure controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and implemented, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving an entity’s disclosure objectives. The likelihood of achieving such objectives is affected by limitations inherent in disclosure controls and procedures. These include the fact that human judgment in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns in internal control can occur because of human failures such as simple errors, mistakes or intentional circumvention of the established processes.
Changes in Controls over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting, known to our Chief Executive Officer or our Chief Financial Officer, that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
-26-
See Note H of the Notes to Consolidated Condensed Financial Statements for detailed information regarding the status of our lawsuits.
While we intend to defend any lawsuit vigorously, we presently believe that the ultimate outcome of current pending legal proceeding will not have any material adverse effect on our financial position, cash flows or overall results of operations. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and unfavorable rulings could occur. An unfavorable ruling could include monetary damages, which could impact on our business or results of operations for the period in which the ruling occurs or future periods.
From time to time, the Company is involved in various routine legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business. The Company’s management does not believe that any of these legal proceedings will have a material adverse impact on the business, financial condition or results of operations of the Company.
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in the “Risk Factors” section of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, filed on February 27, 2014, except for the following:
RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS
Our customers require our products to undergo a lengthy and expensive qualification process without any assurance of product sales and may demand to audit our operations from time to time, the failure of which could adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.
Prior to purchasing our products, our customers may require that our products undergo an extensive qualification process, which involves rigorous reliability testing. This qualification process may continue for six months or longer. However, qualification of a product by a customer does not ensure any sales of the product to that customer. Even after successful qualification and sales of a product to a customer, a subsequent revision to the product, changes in the product's manufacturing process or the selection of a new supplier by us may require a new qualification process, which may result in delays and in us holding excess or obsolete inventory. After our products are qualified, it can take an additional six months or more before the customer commences volume production of components or devices that incorporate our products. Despite these uncertainties, we devote substantial resources, including design, engineering, sales, marketing and management efforts, toward qualifying our products with customers in anticipation of, but with no assurance of, sales. If we are unsuccessful or delayed in qualifying any of our products with a customer, such failure or delay would preclude or delay sales of such product to the customer, which may adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.
In addition, from time to time, our customers may demand an audit of our records, product manufacturing, qualifying, and packaging processes, business practices and other related items to verify that we have complied with our business obligations, standard processes and procedures, product qualities and certain governing laws and regulations related to our business practices, and in accordance with the agreed terms and conditions of mutual business agreements. If the audit shows any deficiency in any of the aforementioned categories, our customers may require us to implement extensive protocols to remedy the deficiency, assess us significant penalties, refuse shipments of our products, return to us existing products, and/or terminate our business relationship, each of which will adversely affect our revenues, results of operations and financial condition.
Changes in the United Kingdom’s equity or bond markets or in actuarial assumptions for our United Kingdom defined benefit pension plan could increase the volatility of the plan’s assets and liabilities, and could require us to increase cash contributions to the plan, which could have a negative impact on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
Our defined benefit pension plan (the “plan”), in the United Kingdom, pays pensions to employees and former employees. The plan’s assets consist primarily of high quality, corporate bonds and stocks traded on the London Stock Exchange and are determined from time to time based on their fair market value. The plan’s obligation to pay pensions is estimated by using actuarial assumptions. To the extent that the plan’s assets are not sufficient to meet the estimated amount of the plan’s obligations, further funding of the plan will be required by the plan’s sponsoring employers, Diodes Zetex Limited and Diodes Zetex Semiconductors Limited, over an agreed deficit recovery period.
-27-
As of September 30, 2014, the estimated obligation of the plan was approximately ₤97 million GBP (approximately $157 million based on a USD:GBP exchange rate of 1.6:1) and the total assets in the plan were approximately ₤73 million GBP (approximately $119 million based on a USD:GBP exchange rate of 1.6:1). Therefore, the plan was underfunded by approximately ₤24 million GBP (approximately $38 million based on a USD:GBP exchange rate of 1.6:1). The difference between plan obligations and assets (the funded status of the plan), is a significant factor in determining the net periodic benefit costs of the plan and the ongoing funding requirements of the plan.
Any fluctuations in the United Kingdom’s equity markets and bond markets or changes in several key actuarial assumptions, including, but not limited to, changes in the plan’s discount rate applied to future benefit obligations to calculate their fair market value today or mortality rates, can (i) affect the level of plan funding; (ii) cause volatility in the net periodic pension cost; and (iii) increase our future funding requirements. In the event that the plan’s experience differs from the actuarial assumptions used by the plan, or actuarial assumptions are changed, the funding status of the plan may change (i.e. the funded status of the plan could increase or decrease). Any decrease in the funding of the plan could result in increased contributions to the plan. A significant increase in contributions required could have a negative impact on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
In 2012, we adopted a payment plan with the trustees of the defined benefit plan, in which we will pay approximately ₤2 million GBP (approximately $3 million based on a USD:GBP exchange rate of 1.6:1) every year from 2012 through 2019. As part of the required pension review, which occurs every three years under the United Kingdom pension regulations, the Company is currently in discussions with the trustees regarding future contributions to the plan and expect to reach an agreement in the second half of 2014.
If we fail to reach an agreement with the trustees, the Pension Regulator in the United Kingdom could impose contributions on Diodes Zetex Limited or Diodes Zetex Semiconductors Limited, or in limited circumstances could require financial support to be provided to the plan from entities connected or associated with Diodes Zetex Limited or Diodes Zetex Semiconductors Limited, including other companies in the group. Furthermore, Diodes Zetex Limited and Diodes Semiconductors Limited remain ultimately liable to fully fund the plan regardless of any failure to agree upon future contributions in respect of a particular actuarial valuation, i.e., if either the plan or those companies were wound up, a debt equal to each company’s share of the entire outstanding deficit at that time (calculated on a statutory conservative basis) would be owed by the relevant company. This could have a material adverse effect on our cash flows, results of operations and financial condition.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
There have been no repurchases of our Common Stock during the third quarter of 2014.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
There are no matters to be reported under this heading.
Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
There are no matters to be reported under this heading.
-28-
Number |
|
Description |
|
Form |
|
Date of First Filing |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filed |
3.1 |
|
Certificate of Incorporation, as amended |
|
10-Q |
|
May 10, 2013 |
|
3.1 |
|
|
3.2 |
|
Amended By-laws of the Company as of September 6, 2014 |
|
8-K |
|
September 10, 2014 |
|
3.1 |
|
|
4.1 |
|
Form of Certificate for Common Stock, par value $0.66 2/3 per share |
|
S-3 |
|
August 25, 2005 |
|
4.1 |
|
|
31.1 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
31.2 |
|
Certification Pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
32.1* |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
32.2* |
|
Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
101.INS |
|
XBRL Instance Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
101.SCH |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
101.CAL |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
101.DEF |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
101.LAB |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
101.PRE |
|
XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
* |
A certification furnished pursuant to Item 601 of the Regulation S-K will not be deemed “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or otherwise subject to the liability of that section. Such certification will not be deemed to be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that the registrant specifically incorporates it by reference. |
PLEASE NOTE: It is inappropriate for investors to assume the accuracy of any covenants, representations or warranties that may be contained in agreements or other documents filed as exhibits to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. In certain instances the disclosure schedules to such agreements or documents contain information that modifies, qualifies and creates exceptions to the representations, warranties and covenants. Moreover, some of the representations and warranties may not be complete or accurate as of a particular date because they are subject to a contractual standard of materiality that is different from those generally applicable to stockholders and/or were used for the purpose of allocating risk among the parties rather than establishing certain matters as facts. Accordingly, you should not rely on the representations and warranties as characterizations of the actual state of facts at the time they were made or otherwise.
-29-
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
DIODES INCORPORATED (Registrant)
By: /s/ Richard D. White |
|
November 7, 2014 |
RICHARD D. WHITE |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer and Secretary |
|
|
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
|
-30-
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Keh-Shew Lu, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Diodes Incorporated;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Keh-Shew Lu |
Keh-Shew Lu |
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: November 7, 2014 |
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION
PURSUANT TO EXCHANGE ACT RULES 13a-14(a) AND 15d-14(a),
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Richard D. White, certify that:
1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Diodes Incorporated;
2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:
(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.
/s/ Richard D. White |
Richard D. White |
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 7, 2014 |
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 of Diodes Incorporated (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Keh-Shew Lu |
Keh-Shew Lu |
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: November 7, 2014 |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diodes Incorporated and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. 1350
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906
OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
The undersigned hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that, to his knowledge, the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014 of Diodes Incorporated (the “Company”) fully complies with the requirements of Sections 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and that the information contained in such periodic report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in such report.
Very truly yours,
/s/ Richard D. White |
Richard D. White |
Chief Financial Officer |
Date: November 7, 2014 |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to Diodes Incorporated and will be furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.
Commitments and Contingencies - Additional Information (Details) (USD $)
|
9 Months Ended |
---|---|
Sep. 30, 2014
|
|
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items] | |
Purchase Commitments | $ 12,000,000 |
Stockholder Derivative Action 1
|
|
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items] | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Defendant | Keh-Shew Lu |
Loss Contingency, Lawsuit Filing Date | Mar. 5, 2013 |
Loss Contingency, Name of Plaintiff | Scherer |
Attorneys' fees | $ 1,245,045 |
Putative Securities Class Action
|
|
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items] | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Defendant | Diodes, Inc. |
Loss Contingency, Lawsuit Filing Date | Mar. 15, 2013 |
Loss Contingency, Name of Plaintiff | Local 731 I.B. of T. Excavators and Pavers Pension Trust Fund |
Stockholder Derivative Action 2
|
|
Commitments And Contingencies [Line Items] | |
Loss Contingency, Name of Defendant | Keh-Shew Lu |
Loss Contingency, Lawsuit Filing Date | Feb. 20, 2014 |
Loss Contingency, Name of Plaintiff | Persson |
Loss Contingency, Allegations | on behalf of the Company against its directors, in which plaintiff alleges that the directors breached their fiduciary duties by allowing the Company to make allegedly misleading public statements in 2011 regarding the labor market in China and its impact on the Company’s business and prospects, by failing to maintain internal controls and by selling shares of Diodes stock while allegedly in possession of material nonpublic information regarding the labor market in China and its impact on the Company’s business and prospects. |
FW3;^50F#ZO(
M0YIY^.G[8;_X5I_:77-\7(9WP7)1'S?-=G=\?5S^\5_])5\NVFY]W*[WS;%^
M7/ZHV^5/3__\Q\-G<_K:OM5UMX`(Q_9Q^=9U[_>K5;MYJP_K]JYYKX_PFY?F
M=%AW\/+TNFK?3_5ZVS]TV*]$$*2KPWIW7-H(]Z T&GI>X#2*MK1R6[!(/6I8DQP\T?VYP*Y0)PS42P,\KTO&C6Y-?8M<@]O3<
MW>2TZMJX_I`0FT63%Z
ML*![0,X[))OL+\%9YA-]F`\$(^? (74]RDQ9)S$-:*98V([R3`N8T"F<+1ZOVWUY(5:IZ0W
ML]".)@KQ$U\=<3?L$]AW8.J=VA!!KK`,;BLA1H0*YEE/=18*/!D?&45\2,==
MU74#$P*-XG9G%S@WW/W2>2]_I2%II!*I]Y0-%JG)&95(+FSZ_II;(M/NX62A
M@SF:_8R=@DUBV\[@`A"$MP^:VVP0.T:+53;:L07<6YD6Y(X=>T$F0)%.=^@%
M;?,9?:!5,WBR2GF/G9RN%`3RY40%@#Z/XG_A\V=E=CNS\-H;I/&\NS!'LM`7
M#2A%X2HLU6P?[L4_?N?)/ZF2?_'@4*AYU6P\APR'6:G61^SHR*)$"E87%+^M
M;-[R;!N__3#^(1,M^=$N(0WB6?8/7[_E.D;\,U6^7VJWQN.*O027[BYV7(2^
M<+'AUIQG[PTMJ"E43G#/Q&AXLU(B/Y]_"Z^X7`ZJR6D7.-(94%+8TH(NV^5+
MP!67^C5P[B_+HB'$K)LS,6V<=MZ#,L45\7+CA]^-QC]0$[Z&^7")MU]Y3D2F
MSWV[GC,8X[>MSBK^,5S\,/OO,+_MT:R]II*-;F)T5$;?@_+VC?*RZ63#5*8K
M@SJ?&/=R4U*&LIDSOQI"JY71+UU*J9@MF'N+:G6SL?FT Z-';R%.AH2"6$8>7AB29`/^)FE],V!9TE0T,?L:.3G
MC`7[4I3$QF@XG!E)$*6ZM+#('K'!#X
K9IS>8(SNZ:M\QZ^MGNO.[=E
MOATNJH\>]_W0J_/JY&*$=3LG1K/;547YL2F>Z_+48Y"V/.8]Z.\.U;E[C587
M<\+5>?OU^?RN:.HSA'BJCE7_8PCJ.G6Q_KP_-6W^=(1Q?V=!7KS&'KY,PM=5
MT39=L^M7$,Y#H=,Q)U[B0:3'AVT%(U!I=]IRMW$_L'4F(M=[?!@2]&]5OG2C
M_YWNT+S\UE;;/ZI3"=F&>5(S\-0T7Q7Z>:L.P<7>Y.I/PPS\V3K;J-"`C^??A[TNU
M[0\;5X0K&?F"`>X\E5W_J5(A7:=X[OJF_@\AID-A$*Z#"%"OS_,5CR63X=M1
M/%0T#/!CWN>/#VWSXD#5P#V[2H53*0/\KD[ZB>=YKVCB_<8AB%[#0I
MVNN/NWRCPZM^9'QF4$C>+\%YZCYR3]9K4;^>4H)=9,&S](,DP1W\1YFO^"QO
MVIQ8#ZE?EO%>6Q'9T^W-Y'#]Y;J.YVP]:7WH=I`*(_2*Y.*)KLQ.N!R/@(:`
MS\8S\NP'E&6*7??M,SP-'+)N?@Z@_S-F,U[4\>N3C%^W=IXFJZUUN)5S*7&K
M/V[JCU=%:^K*2FJ,]HS&]^I=5>!CE:?2$@N+5(SJ^1
YK#LP$4FF597/RKKN!
M$8IV1]GF$.0E8<\1Z[=(2OKO4,C>[J6`BQSB;@ND(-M5\HIWD%%4.6"Y,&A(
M>LS7Z64BZZ)_"3:@4ES$@E5>;)`=[*KI"UP:=Y%?ILZ\.XQGN2F4!4(0/P2B
MAFM_Y,:*ZT);.U5R(ML^A&SG#S'RE@3A`D07346P?73!]W*(MS62'\C=Y?Z0
MT'!M:C+C1/?=`ZAUWQ*`"GZ')>V19G