8-K

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 8-K

CURRENT REPORT

Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d)

of The Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Date of Report (Date of earliest event reported): August 15, 2016

Diebold, Incorporated

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Ohio	1-4879	34-0183970
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)	(Commission File Number)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

5995 Mayfair Road, P.O. Box 3077, North Canton, Ohio	44720-8077
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (330) 490-4000

Not Applicable

(Former name or former address, if changed since last report)

Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions:

¨ Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425)

¨ Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12)

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b))

¨ Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c))

Introductory Note

On August 15, 2016, Diebold, Incorporated (“Diebold” or the “Company”), completed its voluntary public takeover offer (the “Offer”) to exchange each ordinary share of Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, a German public stock corporation (“Wincor Nixdorf”) for €38.98 in cash and 0.434 new common shares of the Company (the “Offer Consideration”). The completion of the Offer is herein referred to as the “Closing”.

At the Closing and pursuant to the terms of the Offer, the Company delivered the Offer Consideration to Wincor Nixdorf shareholders who validly tendered, and did not withdraw, their Wincor Nixdorf ordinary shares in the Offer. Concurrently, the ownership of the tendered shares was transferred to Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, a German partnership limited by shares and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Diebold KGaA”). To the extent that former Wincor Nixdorf shareholders are entitled to fractional shares, those fractional entitlements have been aggregated and sold in the market and the proceeds of such sale will be distributed pro rata no later than August 29, 2016.

As previously disclosed, the Company commenced the Offer pursuant to a business combination agreement (the “Business Combination Agreement”), dated November 23, 2015, between the Company and Wincor Nixdorf. The acceptance period for the Offer began on February 5, 2016, and expired on March 22, 2016, 24:00 hours (Central European Time), and a statutory additional acceptance period pursuant to the German Takeover Act expired on April 12, 2016, 24:00 hours (Central European Summer Time). On August 4, 2016, the Company announced that it had received all of the requisite antitrust clearances required under the regulatory condition of the Offer and, accordingly, all closing conditions to the Offer had been satisfied. Withdrawal rights for the Offer ceased at the end of the acceptance period on March 22, 2016.

In connection with the Closing, the Company issued 9,928,514 common shares (the “New Shares”). At the Closing, the Company (through Diebold KGaA) acquired 22,876,760 Wincor Nixdorf ordinary shares, representing 69.15 percent of the total number of issued Wincor Nixdorf ordinary shares inclusive of treasury shares (76.73 percent of all Wincor Nixdorf ordinary shares outstanding) in exchange for an aggregate Offer Consideration of approximately €891.7 million in cash and the New Shares.

The cash portion of the Offer Consideration, together with transaction costs, was financed with a combination of: (1) a portion of the proceeds from the issuance of $400,000,000 aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due 2024 (the “Notes”) by the Company (guaranteed by certain of its subsidiaries) in an offering exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 that closed on April 19, 2016; and (2) a portion of the proceeds from the Company’s Term Loan B facility provided under the existing credit agreement, dated as of November 23, 2015 (as amended or otherwise modified from time to time, the “Credit Agreement”), among the Company and certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, as borrowers, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, and the lenders named therein, each as previously disclosed in the Company’s reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

The New Shares have commenced trading on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “DBD” and all common shares of the Company (the New Shares and all other issued common shares of the Company) have commenced trading on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the symbol “DBD”.

On August 16, 2016, the board of directors of the Company (the “Board”) and the supervisory and management boards of Wincor Nixdorf approved the conclusion of a proposed domination and profit and loss transfer agreement (the “Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement”) between Diebold KGaA, as the controlling company, and Wincor Nixdorf, as the controlled company. The parties expect to execute the agreement prior to or immediately after a meeting of shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf that is expected to vote on the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement on September 26, 2016. Effectiveness of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement will be subject, among other things, to approval by at least 75 percent of

all outstanding Wincor Nixdorf shares entitled to vote, including those held by Diebold KGaA, and subsequent registration with the commercial register (Handelsregister) of the local court (Amtsgericht) at the registered offices of Wincor Nixdorf. Please refer to the disclosures under Item 8.01 of this Current Report on Form 8-K for a more detailed discussion.

The foregoing summary does not purport to be complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the Contract Report (as defined below), an English translation of which is attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K as Exhibit 99.2, the German exchange offer document, an English translation of which was filed by the Company with the SEC, and the Business Combination Agreement, a copy of which was filed as Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K on November 23, 2015, and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 2.01 Completion of Acquisition or Disposition of Assets.

The information contained in the Introductory Note of this Current Report on Form 8-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 2.01.

On August 15, 2016, the Company issued a press release concerning certain events relating to this Item 2.01. A copy of the press release is attached to this Current Report on Form 8-K as Exhibit 99.1 and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 5.02 Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers.

On August 15, 2016, in accordance with the Business Combination Agreement, the Board elected Dr. Alexander Dibelius, Chairman of the supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf, and Dr. Dieter Düsedau, member of the supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf, to the Board effective on August 16, 2016. Dr. Dibelius and Dr. Düsedau fill the positions created by the increase of the size of the Board, which is disclosed in Item 5.03 of this Current Report on Form 8-K. The Board further determined that each of Dr. Dibelius and Dr. Düsedau qualifies as an independent director under the Company’s director independence standards and the NYSE director independence standards, as applicable and as currently in effect.

In addition, on August 15, 2016, effective as of the Closing and in accordance with the Business Combination Agreement and the related service agreement thereunder, the Board elected Wincor Nixdorf’s Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Eckard Heidloff to the position of President of the Company, reporting to Mr. Andy Mattes who will continue to serve as Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

Mr. Heidloff.

Mr. Heidloff, age 59, has served as Wincor Nixdorf’s President and Chief Executive Officer since 2007. Previously, he served as Wincor Nixdorf’s Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer, with responsibility for worldwide production and logistics. Prior to this, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Wincor Nixdorf Holding GmbH. Earlier in his career, Mr. Heidloff served as the head of business administration for Wincor Nixdorf’s predecessor, Siemens Nixdorf Retail and Banking Systems GmbH. Mr. Heidloff is a member of several supervisory boards of Wincor Nixdorf subsidiaries.

Mr. Heidloff’s existing employment contract with Wincor Nixdorf will continue in effect for the remainder of its term, which expires on February 28, 2019. Pursuant to his existing employment contract, for Wincor Nixdorf’s fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, Mr. Heidloff received base compensation of €700,000.00, non-performance-based fringe benefits of €39,379.59, performance-based short-term variable compensation of €700,000.00, performance-based long-term variable compensation in the form of his participation in Wincor Nixdorf’s share option program 2015 of €893,266.07, and pension accruals of

€126,082.00. Mr. Heidloff is also entitled to certain pension commitments, the total amount of which was €1,254,871.00 at September 30, 2015. In the event that Mr. Heidloff’s term in office is terminated early (other than due to disability or for cause), his existing employment contract provides for a settlement payment that meets the requirements of the German corporate governance code (Deutscher Corporate Governance Kodex). This payment is limited to either two years’ annual compensation, including fringe benefits, or compensation for the remaining term of the employment contract, whichever is lower.

Dr. Dibelius and Dr. Düsedau.

Each of Dr. Dibelius and Dr. Düsedau is entitled to receive director compensation consistent with Diebold’s compensation policy for non-employee directors, prorated as appropriate. Under Diebold’s current compensation policy, non-employee directors receive an annual retainer for their service as directors. In addition to cash compensation, each non-employee director may receive equity awards under Diebold’s Amended and Restated 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan, as amended and restated on February 12, 2014. No decisions have been made regarding committee assignments for Dr. Dibelius or Dr. Düsedau. If such assignments are made, Dr. Dibelius and Dr. Düsedau, respectively, will be entitled to annual committee fees consistent with Diebold’s compensation policy for non-employee directors. Information on Diebold’s compensation policy for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 is disclosed in Diebold’s definitive proxy statement, filed with the SEC on March 10, 2016.

In accordance with the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, the Company intends to nominate and recommend Dr. Dibelius and Dr. Düsedau for election to the Board at the Company’s ensuing annual meeting of shareholders and to continue to nominate and recommend them for election to the Board. Each of Dr. Dibelius and Dr. Düsedau will serve in his respective position until his successor has been chosen and elected or until his earlier resignation or removal.

Item 5.03 Amendments to Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws; Change in Fiscal Year.

Amendment to Bylaws

On August 15, 2016, in accordance with the Business Combination Agreement, the Board resolved to amend Section 1 of Article III of the Amended and Restated Code of Regulations (the “Regulations”) of the Company, by increasing the size of the Board from ten (10) directors to a total of twelve (12) directors effective on August 16, 2016. Specifically, the entire first paragraph of Section 1 of Article III of the Regulations is stricken in its entirety and replaced as follows:

“Section 1 - Number, Election and Term of Office

Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Articles of Incorporation, the Board of Directors shall be composed of not more than twelve (12) persons nor less than five (5) persons unless this number is changed by: (1) the shareholders in accordance with the law of Ohio, or (2) the vote of the majority of the Directors in office. The Directors may increase the number to not more than twelve (12) persons and may decrease the number to not less than five (5) persons. Any Director’s office created by the Directors by reason of an increase in their number may be filled by action of a majority of the Directors in office.”

Except as stated above, the Regulations are unchanged.

The foregoing is a summary of the change introduced by the amendment. A copy of the Regulations, as amended, is included as Exhibit 3.1(ii) of this Current Report on Form 8-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 8.01 Other Events

Approval of Proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement; Contract Report

On August 16, 2016, the Board and the management and supervisory boards of Wincor Nixdorf approved the conclusion of a Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement between Diebold KGaA, as the controlling company, and Wincor Nixdorf, as the controlled company. The parties expect to execute the agreement prior to or immediately after a meeting of shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf that is expected to vote on the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement on September 26, 2016. Effectiveness of the proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement will be subject, among other things, to approval by at least 75 percent of all outstanding Wincor Nixdorf shares entitled to vote, including those held by Diebold KGaA, and subsequent registration of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement with the commercial register (Handelsregister) of the local court (Amtsgericht) at the registered offices of Wincor Nixdorf. While the Company plans to apply for registration of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement without undue delay following approval of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement by Wincor Nixdorf’s shareholders (but no earlier than October 1, 2016), registration may be delayed considerably pending potential shareholder litigation, if any, in Germany.

Under the proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement, when effective and subject to certain limitations pursuant to applicable law, (i) Diebold KGaA will be entitled to issue binding instructions to the management board of Wincor Nixdorf, (ii) Wincor Nixdorf will transfer all of its annual profits to Diebold KGaA, subject to, among other things, the creation or dissolution of certain reserves, and (iii) Diebold KGaA will generally absorb all annual losses incurred by Wincor Nixdorf. In addition, when effective and subject to certain limitations pursuant to applicable law, the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement will provide that Wincor Nixdorf shareholders be offered, at their election, (i) to put their Wincor Nixdorf Shares to Diebold KGaA in exchange for a compensation in cash of €53.34 per Wincor Nixdorf Share, subject to certain adjustments (the “Exit Compensation”) and (ii) to remain Wincor Nixdorf shareholders and receive a recurring compensation in cash of €3.17 (€2.85 net under the current taxation regime) for each full fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf and for each Wincor Nixdorf Share, subject to certain adjustments (the “Recurring Compensation”), provided that depending on the further development of the risk-free rate (which takes into account the current interest rates as well as interest structure data published by the German Federal Bank (Deutsche Bundesbank)) (which currently is 0.7 percent), the final Exit Compensation and Recurring Compensation will be adjusted as follows:

Risk-free Rate	0.5%		0.6%		0.7%		0.8%
Exit Compensation (in €)		55.02		54.17		53.34		52.54
Recurring Compensation (in €)		3.13 (2.82 net)		3.15 (2.83 net)		3.17 (2.85 net)		3.18 (2.87 net)

In connection with the proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement and pursuant to the German stock corporation act (Aktiengesetz), Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf published a joint contract report (Vertragsbericht), dated August 16, 2016, of the management board of Wincor Nixdorf and the management of Diebold KGaA that includes a description of the transactions contemplated by the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement and other information (the “Contract Report”), attaching the form of the proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement and a valuation report of PricewaterhouseCoopers AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, dated August 16, 2016, regarding the enterprise value of Wincor Nixdorf as of September 26, 2016, and other information. In connection with the proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement, Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf also obtained an audit report by an independent court-appointed auditor, ADKL AG, dated August 16, 2016 (the “Audit Report”). Diebold KGaA’s obligations under the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement will be fully guaranteed by the Company.

This summary of the proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement and related documents does not purport to be complete. Please refer to Diebold’s website at www.dieboldnixdorf.com under Company/Investor Relations to obtain a copy of the Contract Report, including attachments, and the Audit Report, English translations of which are attached as Exhibit 99.2 and Exhibit 99.3, respectively, to this Current Report on Form 8-K.

Item 9.01 Financial Statements and Exhibits.

(a) Financial Statements of Businesses Acquired. The Company will file the financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf required by Item 9.01(a) by amendment not later than 71 calendar days after the date this Current Report on Form 8-K is required to be filed.

(b) Pro Forma Financial Information. The Company will file the pro forma financial information required by Item 9.01(b) by amendment not later than 71 calendar days after the date this Current Report on Form 8-K is required to be filed.

(d) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed with this report:

2.1 Business Combination Agreement, dated November 23, 2015, by and among Diebold, Incorporated and Wincor Nixdorf AG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company, dated November 23, 2015).

3.1(ii) Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of Diebold, Incorporated.

99.1 Press release issued by the Company, dated August 15, 2016, concerning certain events relating to Item 2.01 in this Current Report on Form 8-K.

99.2 Joint Contract Report (Vertragsbericht), dated August 16, 2016, of the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the Management of Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA.

99.3 Audit Report by ADKL AG, dated August 16, 2016, in connection with the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement (excluding attachments).

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ABOUT FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this document regarding matters that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These include statements regarding management’s intentions, plans, beliefs, expectations or forecasts for the future including, without limitation, the business combination with Wincor Nixdorf, the entry into and consummation of the proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement and related transactions. Such forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of Diebold and involve risks and uncertainties because such statements relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future; consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the statements. Such forward-looking statements may include statements about the business combination with Wincor Nixdorf, the effects of any transaction on the businesses and financial conditions of Diebold or Wincor Nixdorf, including synergies, pro forma revenue, targeted operating margin, net debt to EBITDA ratios, accretion to earnings and other financial or operating measures. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance. In addition, risks and uncertainties related to the proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement include, but are not limited to, the risk that it may not be approved or its effectiveness be delayed as a result of litigation or otherwise or may not occur, and risks associated with any appraisal proceedings. Risks and uncertainties may also include, but are not limited to, the occurrence of any event, change or other circumstances that could give rise to the termination of the Business Combination

Agreement or the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement, the timing, receipt and terms and conditions of any governmental and regulatory approvals that could reduce anticipated benefits of the business combination, and risks associated with the impact the Business Combination Agreement, the proposed Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement and any related litigation may have on the business and operations of the combined company, including on the ability of the combined company to retain and hire key personnel, and maintain relationships with its suppliers and customers. These risks, as well as other risks are more fully discussed in Diebold’s reports filed with the SEC and available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Any forward-looking statements speak only as at the date of this document. Except as required by applicable law, neither Diebold nor Wincor Nixdorf undertakes any obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized.

	Diebold, Incorporated
Date: August 19, 2016
	By:	/s/ Jonathan B. Leiken
	Name:	Jonathan B. Leiken
	Title:	Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit Number	Description
2.1	Business Combination Agreement, dated November 23, 2015, by and among Diebold, Incorporated and Wincor Nixdorf AG (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Current Report on Form 8-K filed by the Company on November 23, 2015).
3.1(ii)	Amended and Restated Code of Regulations of Diebold, Incorporated.
99.1	Press release issued by the Company, dated August 15, 2016, concerning certain events relating to Item 2.01 in this Current Report on Form 8-K.
99.2	Joint Contract Report (Vertragsbericht), dated August 16, 2016, of the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the Management of Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA.
99.3	Audit Report by ADKL AG, dated August 16, 2016, in connection with the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement (excluding attachments).

EX-3.1(II)

Exhibit 3.1(ii)

AMENDED AND RESTATED CODE OF REGULATIONS

OF

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED

ARTICLE I

ISSUANCE AND TRANSFER OF SHARES

Section 1 - Certificates; Registrar and Transfer Agent

The Board of Directors shall have authority to make such rules and regulations as it deems expedient concerning the issuance, transfer and registration of certificates for shares and the shares represented thereby. The Board of Directors may at any time, by Resolution, provide for the opening of transfer books for the making and registration of transfers of shares of this corporation in any State of the United States or in any foreign country, and may employ and appoint and remove, at discretion, any agent or agents to keep the records of its shares or to transfer or to register shares, or to perform all of said functions, at any place that the Board of Directors may deem advisable.

Section 2 - Transfers of Shares

Transfers of Shares shall be made only on the books of the corporation at the office thereof, or at the office of any Registrar and Transfer Agent that may at any time be appointed by the Board of Directors for that purpose, upon surrender of the certificates (or other appropriate evidence if shares are uncertificated) to be transferred, properly assigned, evidencing the number of shares so transferred. Certificates so surrendered shall be cancelled and attached to the stubs corresponding thereto in the stock certificate book, and notations of such cancellation made in proper books kept by the corporation or by such Registrar and Transfer Agent.

Section 3 - Record Date and Closing Transfer Books

The Board of Directors may fix a date, which shall not be a past date and which shall not be more than sixty days preceding the date of any meeting of shareholders, or the date fixed for payment of any dividend or distribution, or the date for the allotment of rights, or (subject to contract rights with respect thereto) the date when any change or conversion or exchange of shares shall be made or go into effect, or the date as of which written consents, waivers or releases are to be obtained from shareholders under any applicable provisions of law, or the date when or prior whereto any rights or powers are to be exercised by shareholders, as a record date for the determination of the shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at any such meeting or any adjournments thereof, or entitled to receive payment of any such dividend or distribution, or to receive any such allotment of rights, or to exercise rights in respect of any such change, conversion or exchange of shares, or to execute such consents, waivers or releases, or to exercise any such rights or powers of shareholders; and in any such case, only shareholders of record at the date so fixed shall be entitled to notice of and to vote at such meeting, or any adjournments thereof, or to receive payment of any such dividend or distribution, or to receive any such allotment of rights, or to exercise any such rights or powers, or to execute such consents, waivers or releases, as the case may be, notwithstanding any transfer of any shares on the books of the corporation after any record date fixed as aforesaid. The Board of Directors may close the books of the corporation against transfers of shares during the whole or any part of said period, including the time of any such meetings of shareholders or any adjournments thereof.

Section 4 - Lost, Destroyed or Mutilated Certificates

If any Certificate of shares of this corporation shall become worn, defaced or mutilated, the Directors, upon production and surrender thereof, may order the same cancelled and a new certificate issued in lieu thereof. If any such certificate be lost,

stolen or destroyed, the Directors, upon the furnishing of such evidence as shall be satisfactory to them of such loss, stealing or destruction, and upon the giving of such indemnity as they shall deem satisfactory, may order a new certificate to be issued in lieu of such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate to the person last appearing upon the books of the corporation to be the owner of such lost, stolen or destroyed certificate.

ARTICLE II

MEETINGS OF SHAREHOLDERS

Section 1 - Annual Meeting

The Annual Meeting of the Shareholders of this corporation shall be held at such time and place, within or without the State of Ohio, as may be designated by the Board of Directors or, in the absence of a designation by the Board of Directors, the Chairman of the Board of Directors, the Chief Executive Officer, the President or the Secretary, and stated in the notice of meeting. The Board of Directors may postpone and reschedule any previously scheduled annual meeting of the shareholders. The Board of Directors may also determine that the Annual Meeting shall not be held at any physical place, but instead may be held solely by means of communications equipment that enables the shareholders (and proxyholders) to participate in the meeting and to vote on matters submitted to the shareholders, including an opportunity to read or hear the proceedings of the meeting and to speak or otherwise participate in the proceedings contemporaneously with other participants. Any shareholder using communications equipment will be deemed present in person at the meeting whether the meeting is to be held at a designated place or solely by means of communications equipment. The Board of Directors may adopt guidelines and procedures for the use of communications equipment in connection with a meeting of shareholders to permit the corporation to verify that a person is a shareholder or proxyholder and to maintain a record of any vote or other action.

Section 2 - Special Meetings

Special meetings of shareholders may be called by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President or by the Board of Directors or by written order of a majority of the Directors or by the Executive Committee, if there be one, or by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Vice President, or the Secretary, when requested in writing by the holders of a majority of the shares of the corporation at the time entitled to exercise voting power in the election of Directors. No such special meeting shall be held elsewhere than at the principal office of the corporation nor outside the State of Ohio unless so ordered by a resolution of the Board of Directors or by the written order of all the Directors designating the place of such meeting or designating that the meeting will be held by means of communications equipment.

Section 3 - Notice of Meetings

Written notice of every annual or special meeting of shareholders, stating the time when and place where the same is to be held, if any, the purpose or purposes thereof, and the means, if any, by which shareholders can be present and vote at the meeting through the use of communications equipment, shall be given to each shareholder of record entitled to vote at such meeting or to receive notice thereof either by personal delivery or by mail, overnight delivery service, or any other means of communication authorized by the shareholder to whom the notice is given, not more than sixty (60) days nor less than seven (7) days before such meeting. If mailed or sent by overnight delivery service, the notice shall be directed to a shareholder at his address last appearing upon the records of the corporation. If sent by other means of communication authorized by the shareholder, the notice shall be sent to the address furnished by the shareholder for such transmissions. In the event of the transfer of shares after notice has been given, and prior to the holding of the meeting, it shall not be necessary to notify the transferee; and if any meeting is adjourned to another time or place, no further notice as to such adjourned meeting need be given other than by announcement at the meeting at which such adjournment is taken, even though such adjournment be taken for want of a quorum. Whenever notice of any such meeting shall have been provided as hereby required, failure of delivery thereof to any shareholder shall not invalidate or affect any annual or special meeting or any proceedings had or action taken thereat. Any shareholder may, in writing, waive any notice hereby required.

Section 4 - Quorum

Except as otherwise expressly provided in the corporation’s Articles of Incorporation, as amended (the “Articles of Incorporation”), the shareholders present in person, by proxy, or by the use of communications equipment at any meeting held for the determination of the number of Directors or the election of Directors, or for consideration and action upon reports required to be laid before such meeting, shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting such business as aforesaid; but at any meeting of shareholders called for any other purpose, or for consideration of and action upon any matters other than those herein- before mentioned, the presence in person, by proxy, or by the use of communications equipment of holders of a majority in number of shares issued and outstanding and entitled to exercise voting power at such meeting, shall be necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of such business. Whether or not a quorum is present at any meeting, the shareholders present in person by proxy, or by the use of communications equipment, by the vote of a majority of the voting power represented by those so present, may adjourn the meeting to a time fixed by such vote without other notice than the announcement made following the vote.

Section 5 - Voting

Except as otherwise expressly required by law, the Articles of Incorporation or this Amended and Restated Code of Regulations, at any meeting of shareholders at which a quorum is present, a majority of the votes cast, whether in person or by proxy, on any matter properly brought before such meeting in accordance with Article II Section 6 will be the act of the shareholders. An abstention shall not represent a vote cast. Every proxy must be in a form permitted by chapter 1701 of the Ohio Revised Code. A shareholder may revoke any proxy that is not irrevocable by attending the meeting and voting in person or by delivering to the corporation of a verifiable notification of revocation or a later appointment. The presence at a meeting of the person appointing a proxy does not revoke the appointment. The vote upon any question brought before a meeting of the shareholders may be by voice vote, unless otherwise required by law, the Articles of Incorporation or this Amended and Restated Code of Regulations or unless the presiding officer otherwise determines. Every vote taken by written ballot will be counted by the inspectors of election, if inspectors of election are appointed.

Section 6 - Order of Business

(a) Order of Business. The Chairman, or such other officer of the corporation designated by a majority of the total number of Directors that the corporation would have if there were no vacancies on the Board of Directors (such number being referred to as the “Whole Board”), will call meetings of shareholders to order and will act as presiding officer thereof. Unless otherwise determined by the Board of Directors prior to the meeting, the presiding officer of the meeting of shareholders will also determine the order of business and have the authority in his sole discretion to regulate the conduct of any such meeting including, without limitation, by imposing restrictions on the persons (other than shareholders of the corporation or their duly appointed proxies) who may attend any such shareholders’ meeting, by ascertaining whether any shareholder or his proxy may be excluded from any meeting of shareholders based upon any determination by the presiding officer, in his sole discretion, that any such person has unduly disrupted or is likely to disrupt the proceedings of the meeting, and by determining the circumstances in which any person may make a statement or ask questions at any meeting of shareholders.

(b) At an annual meeting of the shareholders, only such business will be conducted or considered as is properly brought before the meeting. To be properly brought before an annual meeting, business must be (i) specified in the notice of meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the direction of the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, a Vice President, the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary in accordance with Article II Section 3, (ii) otherwise properly brought before the meeting by the presiding officer or by or at the direction of a majority of the Whole Board, or (iii) otherwise properly requested to be brought before the meeting by a shareholder of the corporation in accordance with Article II Section 6(c).

(c) For business to be properly requested by a shareholder to be brought before an annual meeting, (i) the shareholder must be a shareholder of the corporation of record at the time of the giving of the notice for such annual meeting provided for in this Amended and Restated Code of Regulations, (ii) the shareholder must be entitled to vote at such meeting, (iii) the shareholder must have given timely notice thereof in writing to the Secretary, and (iv) if the shareholder, or the beneficial owner on whose behalf any business is brought before the meeting, has provided the corporation with a Proposal

Solicitation Notice, as that term is defined in this Article II Section 6(c) below, such shareholder or beneficial owner must have delivered a proxy statement and form of proxy to the holders of at least the percentage of shares of the corporation entitled to vote required to approve such business that the shareholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting and included in such materials the Proposal Solicitation Notice. To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the corporation not less than 60 nor more than 90 calendar days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which the corporation first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders; provided, however, that if the date of the annual meeting is advanced more than 30 calendar days prior to or delayed by more than 30 calendar days after the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th calendar day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment of an annual meeting commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholder’s notice as described above. A shareholder’s notice to the Secretary must set forth as to each matter the shareholder proposes to bring before the annual meeting (A) a description in reasonable detail of the business desired to be brought before the annual meeting and the reasons for conducting such business at the annual meeting, (B) the name and address, as they appear on the corporation’s books, of the shareholder proposing such business and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made, (C) the class and number of shares of the corporation that are owned beneficially and of record by the shareholder proposing such business and by the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made, (D) any material interest of such shareholder proposing such business and the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the proposal is made in such business, and (E) whether either such shareholder or beneficial owner intends to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of shares of the corporation entitled to vote required to approve the proposal (an affirmative statement of such intent, a “Proposal Solicitation Notice”). Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Amended and Restated Code of Regulations, a shareholder must also comply with all applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to the matters set forth in this Article II Section 6(c). For purposes of this Section 6(c) and Article III Section 5, “public announcement” means disclosure in a press release reported by the Dow Jones News Service, Associated Press, or comparable national news service or in a document publicly filed by the corporation with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Sections 13, 14, or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or publicly filed by the corporation with any national securities exchange or quotation service through which the corporation’s stock is listed or traded, or furnished by the corporation to its shareholders. Nothing in this Article II Section 6(c) will be deemed to affect any rights of shareholders to request inclusion of proposals in the corporation’s proxy statement pursuant to Rule 14a-8 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

(d) At a special meeting of shareholders, only such business may be conducted or considered as is properly brought before the meeting. To be properly brought before a special meeting, business must be (i) specified in the notice of the meeting (or any supplement thereto) given by or at the direction of the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, a Vice President, the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary (or in case of their failure to give any required notice, the other persons entitled to give notice) in accordance with Article II Section 3 or (ii) otherwise brought before the meeting by the presiding officer or by or at the direction of a majority of the Whole Board.

(e) The determination of whether any business sought to be brought before any annual or special meeting of the shareholders is properly brought before such meeting in accordance with this Section 6 will be made by the presiding officer of such meeting. If the presiding officer determines that any business is not properly brought before such meeting, he will so declare to the meeting and any such business will not be conducted or considered.

ARTICLE III

DIRECTORS

Section 1 - Number, Election and Term of Office

Except as otherwise expressly provided in the Articles of Incorporation, the Board of Directors shall be composed of not more than twelve (12) persons nor less than five (5) persons unless this number is changed by: (1) the shareholders in accordance with the law of Ohio, or (2) the vote of the majority of the Directors in office. The Directors may increase the number to not more than twelve (12) persons and may decrease the number to not less than five (5) persons. Any Director’s office created by the Directors by reason of an increase in their number may be filled by action of a majority of the Directors in office.

The election of Directors shall be held only at the annual meeting of shareholders in each year. The Directors shall hold office for the term of one year and until their successors are elected and qualified, except that any Director at any time elected to fill a newly created Directorship or a vacancy shall hold office until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his successor is elected.

Section 2 - Qualification

Each Director shall be a shareholder of the corporation, or shall become a shareholder as soon as practicable following his or her appointment or election, but need not be a citizen of the state of Ohio.

Section 3 - Vacancies

Upon the happening of any vacancy in the membership of the Board of Directors, whether by death, resignation, increase of the authorized number of Directors without the filling of such new position by the shareholders at the meeting at which such increase is made, failure of the shareholders at any time to elect the full number of authorized Directors, or otherwise, and in any of the contingencies provided by the laws of Ohio, the remaining Directors, or the Directors duly elected, though less than a quorum, may, by a majority vote, fill such vacancy in the Board for the unexpired term, or, in the case of a newly created Directorship, for a term which shall expire contemporaneously with the terms of Directors then qualified and serving.

Section 4 - Nominations of Directors; Election

(a) Only persons who are nominated in accordance with this Article III Section 4 will be eligible for election at a meeting of shareholders to be members of the Board of Directors of the corporation.

(b) Nominations of persons for election as Directors of the corporation may be made only at an annual meeting of shareholders (i) by or at the direction of the Board of Directors or a committee thereof or (ii) by any shareholder who is a shareholder of record at the time of giving of notice provided for in this Article III Section 4, who is entitled to vote for the election of Directors at such meeting, and who complies with the procedures set forth in this Article III Section 4. If a shareholder, or a beneficial owner on whose behalf any such nomination is made, has provided the corporation with a Nomination Solicitation Notice, as that term is defined in this Section 4 below, such shareholder or beneficial owner must have delivered a proxy statement and form of proxy to the holders of at least the percentage of shares of the corporation entitled to vote required to approve such nomination and included in such materials the Nomination Solicitation Notice. All nominations by shareholders must be made pursuant to timely notice in proper written form to the Secretary.

(c) To be timely, a shareholder’s notice must be delivered to or mailed and received at the principal executive offices of the corporation not less than 60 nor more than 90 calendar days prior to the first anniversary of the date on which the corporation first mailed its proxy materials for the preceding year’s annual meeting of shareholders; provided, however, that if the date of the annual meeting is advanced more than 30 calendar days prior to or delayed by more than 30 calendar days after the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting, notice by the shareholder to be timely must be so delivered not later than the close of business on the later of the 90th calendar day prior to such annual meeting or the 10th calendar day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made. In no event shall the public announcement of an adjournment of an annual meeting commence a new time period for the giving of a shareholder’s notice as described above. To be in proper written form, such shareholder’s notice must set forth or include: (i) the name and address, as they appear on the corporation’s books, of the shareholder giving the notice and of the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made; (ii) a representation that the shareholder giving the notice is a holder of record of stock of the corporation entitled to vote at such annual meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxy at the annual meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice; (iii) the class and number of shares of stock of the corporation owned beneficially and of record by the shareholder giving the notice and by the beneficial owner, if any, on whose behalf the nomination is made; (iv) a description of all arrangements or understandings between or among any of (A) the shareholder giving the notice, (B) the beneficial owner on whose behalf the notice is given, (C) each nominee, and (D) any other person or persons (naming such person or persons) pursuant to which the nomination or nominations are to be made by the shareholder giving the notice; (v)

such other information regarding each nominee proposed by the shareholder giving the notice as would be required to be included in a proxy statement filed pursuant to the proxy rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission had the nominee been nominated, or intended to be nominated, by the Board of Directors; (vi) the signed consent of each nominee to serve as a Director of the corporation if so elected; and (vii) whether either such shareholder or beneficial owner intends to deliver a proxy statement and form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of shares of the corporation entitled to vote required to elect such nominee or nominees (the “Nomination Solicitation Notice”). At the request of the Board of Directors, any person nominated by the Board of Directors for election as a Director must furnish to the Secretary that information required to be set forth in a shareholder’s notice of nomination which pertains to the nominee. The presiding officer of any annual meeting will, if the facts warrant, determine that a nomination was not made in accordance with the procedures prescribed by this Article III Section 4, and if he should so determine, he will so declare to the meeting, and the defective nomination will be disregarded. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Article III Section 4, a shareholder must also comply with all applicable requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and the rules and regulations thereunder with respect to the matters set forth in this Article III Section 4.

Section 5 - Meetings of Directors

Stated meetings of the Board of Directors may be held at such time and intervals as may by the Board of Directors from time to time be determined, by either standing resolution or by-law, and may be held without notice of the time, place or purpose thereof when such time and place have been so fixed by resolution or by-law. Such meetings may be held at any place within or without the State of Ohio that the Board may by resolution from time to time fix.

Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be held at any time or place within or without the State of Ohio upon call by the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Secretary or a majority of the Directors. Twenty-four (24) hours’ notice of the time, place and purpose of such meeting shall be given to each Director either personally or by mail, overnight delivery service, telephone, telegram, telex, facsimile, electronic mail or other medium of communication. Any notice hereby required may be waived in writing or by telegraph by any Director and shall be deemed waived if the Director is present at such meeting.

If the day fixed as aforesaid for any stated or special meeting shall fall upon a legal holiday, such meeting shall be held at the same time upon the next succeeding day that is not a legal holiday.

Section 6 - Participation in Meetings by Communications Equipment

Meetings of the Board of Directors or of any committee of the Board of Directors may be held through any means of communications equipment if all persons participating can hear each other, and such participation will constitute presence in person at such meeting.

ARTICLE IV

OFFICERS

The officers of the corporation who shall be elected by the Board of Directors shall be a Chairman of the Board, a Chief Executive Officer, a President, a Chief Financial Officer, a Vice President, a Secretary and a Treasurer. The Board of Directors may also, from time to time, by resolution, appoint one or more special or departmental Vice Presidents with titles indicative of their departments or functions, one or more Assistant Secretaries, one or more Assistant Treasurers, or other officers, all with such titles, designations, duties, functions and authority as the Board shall prescribe, each of whom shall serve in any such office during the pleasure of the Board. The Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President shall be Directors. Any two or more offices may be held by the same person, but no officer shall execute, acknowledge, verify or countersign any instrument in more than one capacity if such instrument is required by law, by these Amended and Restated Regulations or by any act of the corporation to be executed, acknowledged, verified or countersigned by two or more officers. The term of office of the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer, the President, the Vice President, the Secretary and the Treasurer shall be for one year and until their respective successors are elected and qualified, except in the case of any such officer elected to fill a vacancy, who shall serve until the first meeting of the Board of Directors after the next ensuing annual meeting of shareholders.

ARTICLE V

DUTIES OF OFFICERS

Section 1 - Chairman of the Board

The Chairman of the Board shall preside at all meetings of the shareholders and of the Directors, and shall perform such other duties as may be prescribed by the Board of Directors.

Section 2 - Chief Executive Officer

The Chief Executive Officer shall have responsibility for the general and active management of the business of the corporation and shall have the general powers and duties of management usually vested in the Chief Executive Officer of a corporation. The Chief Executive Officer shall see that all orders and resolutions of the Board of Directors are carried into effect and shall implement the general directives, plans and policies formulated by the Board of Directors. Except as otherwise provided in the Articles of Incorporation, the Chief Executive Officer may employ and discharge employees and agents of the corporation, except such as shall be appointed by the Board of Directors, and he or she may delegate these powers. In the absence or disability of the Chairman of the Board, the Chief Executive Officer shall preside at all meetings of the shareholders or of the Directors. Except where by law the signature of the President is required, the Chief Executive Officer shall possess the same power as the President to execute all authorized deeds, mortgages, bonds, contracts or other instruments of obligations in the name of the corporation. During the absence or disability of the President, the Chief Executive Officer shall exercise all the powers and discharge all the duties of the President. The Chief Executive Officer shall also perform such other duties and may exercise such other powers as may from time to time be assigned to such officer by these bylaws or by the Board of Directors.

Section 3 - President

The President shall have such responsibilities and shall perform such duties as may from time to time be prescribed by the shareholders, by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, if there be one. The President shall have power to execute any authorized deeds, mortgages, bonds, contracts or other instruments of obligations in the name of the corporation.

Section 4 - Chief Financial Officer

The Chief Financial Officer, if any, shall have responsibility for the financial management of the corporation. The Chief Financial Officer shall have such powers and perform such duties as from time to time may be assigned to him or her by the Board of the Directors, by the Chief Executive Officer or by the President. The Chief Financial Officer shall keep and maintain, or cause to be kept and maintained, adequate and correct books and records of the corporation, using appropriate accounting principles; have supervision over and be responsible for the financial affairs of the corporation; cause to be kept at the principal executive office of the corporation and preserved for review as required by law or regulation all financial records of the corporation; be responsible for the establishment of adequate internal control over the transactions and books of account of the corporation; and be responsible for rendering to the proper officers and the Board of Directors upon request, and to the shareholders and other parties as required by law or regulation, financial statements of the corporation.

Section 5 - Vice Presidents; Special Vice Presidents

(a) Any Vice President shall have power, coordinated with that of the Chief Executive Officer or the President, when so authorized or directed by the Board of Directors, or by the Executive Committee if there be one, to make, execute and deliver any deeds, mortgages, bonds, contracts, notes or other instruments in the name and on behalf of the corporation, and any such instrument, when so executed, shall be as valid and binding as though executed by the President. Any Vice President shall also perform such other duties and functions, and exercise such authority, as may from time to time be prescribed by the Board of Directors, or by the Executive Committee, if there be one. The Board of Directors may assign to any Vice President the title of Executive Vice President, Senior Vice President or any other title selected by the Board.

(b) Special or departmental Vice Presidents at any time appointed shall perform such duties and functions and exercise such authority as may from time to time be prescribed by the Board of Directors, or by the Executive Committee if there be one; but all authority of any such Vice President to bind the corporation shall be confined to matters relating to the special department or particular duties allotted to him, unless in any instance other authority be especially conferred upon him by resolution of the Board of Directors for such particular occasion.

Section 6 - Secretary

The Secretary shall keep minutes of all proceedings of the shareholders and of the Board of Directors, and also keep or cause to be kept by an Assistant Secretary the minutes of proceedings of the Executive Committee, if there be one, and shall attest or cause to be attested the records thereof. He shall keep or cause to be kept such books as may be required by the Board of Directors, or by the Executive Committee if there be one; shall have charge of the seal and stock books of the corporation except as may at any time be otherwise ordered by the Board of Directors; shall attest and issue, or cause so to be attested and issued by an Assistant Secretary, or after due signature and attestation to be authenticated and issued by a Transfer Agent when one has been appointed, all certificates of shares, except as may be otherwise ordered by the Board of Directors; shall affix the seal of the corporation to all instruments requiring such seal and shall attest the name or attest the signature of the Chief Executive Officer, the President or any other officer to any instrument when necessary or proper, or cause the same to be done by an Assistant Secretary; and shall generally perform such duties as may be required of him by the shareholders, by the Board of Directors, by the Executive Committee, if there be one, by the Chief Executive Officer or by the President, and such other duties as may usually pertain to his office. The Secretary shall also prepare and certify, or cause to be prepared and certified by the Transfer Agent if there be one, as of the record date for any meeting of shareholders, or upon any other occasion in respect whereof a record date is fixed, or at any other time when the same may be necessary or required by the Board of Directors, the Executive Committee, the Chief Executive Officer or the President, a list of the shareholders of record upon the books of the corporation at such record date and to receive notice of and to vote at any meeting of shareholders, or to receive payment of dividends or allotment of rights, or to exercise any rights or powers.

Section 7 - Treasurer

The Treasurer shall receive and have in charge all moneys, bills, notes, bonds and similar property belonging to the corporation, and shall do with the same as may be ordered by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, if there be one. The Treasurer shall keep or cause to be kept such financial accounts as may be required and shall generally perform such duties as may be required of him by the shareholders, by the Directors, by the Executive Committee, if there be one, by the Chief Executive Officer or by the President.

Section 8 - Assistant Secretaries and Assistant Treasurers

Any Assistant Secretaries or Assistant Treasurers shall perform such duties as may from time to time be prescribed by the Board of Directors, by the Executive Committee, if there be one, by the Chief Executive Officer or by the President, and in the performance of such duties, shall also be respectively under the general supervision and direction of the Secretary or of the Treasurer, as the case may be.

Section 9 - Powers of Officers

The Board of Directors shall have power at any time to change, modify or abolish, by resolution, any powers of any officer, or to assign to any officer any new powers except in any instance where certain powers are by law required to be exercised by particular officers.

Section 10 - Checks upon Bank Deposits

Checks upon the bank deposits of the corporation shall be signed and/or countersigned by such officers or employees as the Board of Directors may from time to time by resolution authorize, and such directions and authorizations may be varied with respect to various classes of checks.

ARTICLE VI

COMMITTEES

Section 1 - Committees Generally

The Board of Directors may from time to time create an Executive Committee or any other committee or committees of directors, to consist of one or more directors and to act in the intervals between meetings of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may delegate to such committee or committees any of its authority other than that of filling vacancies among the Board of Directors or in any committee of the Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may appoint one or more directors as alternate members of any such committee to take the place of absent committee members at meetings of such committee. Unless otherwise directed by the Board of Directors, a majority of the members of any committee appointed by the Board pursuant to this Article VI Section 1 shall constitute a quorum at any meeting thereof, and the act of a majority of the members present at a meeting at which a quorum is present shall be the act of such committee. Action may be taken by any such committee without a meeting by a writing or writings signed by all of its members. Any such committee shall prescribe its own rules for calling and holding meetings and its method of procedure, subject to any rules prescribed by the Board of Directors, and will keep a written record of all action taken by it. Any such committee may create one or more subcommittees, each such subcommittee to consist of one or more members of such committee, and may delegate to such subcommittee any or all of the powers and authority of such committee.

Section 2 - Executive Committee

The Board of Directors may appoint an Executive Committee, consisting of three (3) or more Directors. Such Executive Committee, if so appointed, shall have power, during the recesses of the Board of Directors, to perform any acts relating to the current management and operation of the business of the corporation as are not by law or by these Regulations specifically reserved to be performed by the Board of Directors, except that the Board of Directors shall have power, at any time, by resolution, to limit or restrict the powers so to be exercised by such Executive Committee. Such Executive Committee shall keep minutes and records of its proceedings and transactions and report the same from time to time to the Board of Directors. No act of the Executive Committee, when fully completed, shall be subject to modification or rescission by the Board of Directors insofar as the same may affect the rights of third parties already fixed but the Board of Directors may rescind, modify or revise any such action of the Executive Committee, insofar as the same affects future transactions, or may establish any rules or regulations it may deem proper governing future acts of the Executive Committee.

Stated or special meetings of the Committee may be held with or without notice, within or without the State of Ohio, if all the members are present, or upon twenty-four (24) hours’ notice given personally or by mail, telephone, telegram, telex, facsimile, electronic mail or other similar medium of communication, if a majority of the members are present; but the concurrence of a majority of all members of the Committee shall always be necessary to any action or exercise of powers by the Committee. Any vacancy in the Executive Committee, however occurring, shall be filled by the Board of Directors.

ARTICLE VII

COMPENSATION OF OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS: CERTAIN POWERS OF DIRECTORS

Compensation of the Directors, if any, shall be such as the shareholders or the Directors may, by resolution, from time to time determine. The compensation of officers may be fixed from time to time by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors, if there be one, and otherwise by the Board of Directors, and the compensation of other employees may be fixed from time to time by the Compensation Committee, if there be one, or by any officer so authorized by the Board of Directors or the Compensation Committee. No officer shall be precluded from voting upon any resolution fixing his own salary, or from voting upon or authorizing, or participating in the authorization, of any contract or other transaction between himself and this corporation, or between this corporation and any other corporation or any partnership of which he is a Director, shareholder, partner or member, by reason of the fact that he is an officer, a Director or a member of the Compensation Committee, if there be one, of this corporation; nor shall any Director be disqualified from so acting in any of the instances aforesaid by reason of

the fact that he is a Director of this corporation; all objection or exception on the part of every shareholder to the right of any Director, officer or member of the Compensation Committee, if there be one, to vote or act upon all such matters being expressly waived and renounced by the adoption of these Regulations.

ARTICLE VIII

BONDS

The Treasurer and any other officer or employee, if required by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, if there be one, shall furnish bond in such amount and with such surety as shall be prescribed and approved by the Board of Directors or by the Executive Committee, if there be one, assuring the faithful performance of his duties and the faithful accounting for and surrender of all moneys and property of the corporation which shall come to his possession. Premiums for all such bonds shall be paid by the corporation.

ARTICLE IX

FISCAL YEAR

The Board of Directors shall have power, at any time, to fix or alter, by resolution, the fiscal year of the corporation, but unless so fixed or altered by the Board of Directors the fiscal year shall be the calendar year commencing on January 1st and ending on December 31st of each year.

ARTICLE X

SEAL

The corporate seal of this corporation shall be circular in form with the words “DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED, CANTON, OHIO” surrounding the words “Corporate Seal.”

ARTICLE XI

DEFINITIONS

The word “person”, wherever used in these Regulations, shall be taken to mean and include individuals, partnerships, associations, limited liability companies and bodies corporate. Words of the singular number shall be taken to include the plural and those of the plural number shall be taken to include the singular, wherever appropriate. Nouns and pronouns of the masculine gender shall include the feminine wherever appropriate.

ARTICLE XII

AMENDMENT

Except as otherwise provided by law or by the Articles of Incorporation or this Amended and Restated Code of Regulations, these Regulations may be adopted, amended or repealed (a) to the extent as may be permitted by chapter 1701 of the Ohio Revised Code from time to time, by the Directors or (b) by the vote of the holders of a majority of the power of the corporation at any annual meeting of shareholders or at any special meeting called for that purpose; provided, that whenever, by virtue of the provisions of law or of the Articles of Incorporation, any holders of shares other than common shares shall be entitled to vote upon any proposition embodied in any such amendment, then such amendments must be assented to or adopted by the vote of the holders of a majority or by the written assent of the holders of two-thirds of all shares entitled for such purpose to exercise voting powers in any such instance. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Article XII, no amendment to Article XIII will be effective to eliminate or diminish the rights of persons specified in that Article existing at the time immediately preceding such amendment.

ARTICLE XIII

INDEMNITY TO DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Each Director and each officer of the corporation (and the personal and legal representatives of each) shall be indemnified by the corporation, to the full extent then permitted by law, against all costs and expenses (including attorney’s fees) incurred by him (as they are incurred, in advance of the final disposition thereof), or to which he may be subjected, in connection with or resulting from any threatened, pending or completed action, suit, proceeding or claim to which he may be made a party by reason of his being or having been a Director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or his being or having been a director, trustee, officer, employee, or an agent of another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise serving at the request of the corporation, or in connection with or resulting from any settlement of any such action, suit, proceeding or claim, other than amounts paid to the corporation itself (either by way of settlement or in satisfaction of any judgment rendered against such Director or officer), whether or not he is a Director or officer at the time of incurring or becoming subjected to such costs or expense, and whether the action or omission to act, which is the basis of such action, suit, proceeding, claim or settlement, occurred before or after the adoption of this article; except that such indemnity shall not extend to any matters as to which he shall be finally adjudged, in any such action, suit or proceeding, to be liable for negligence or misconduct in the performance of his duties as such Director or officer, nor to any settlement made without judgment, unless it be determined by the Board of Directors that he was not guilty of such negligence or misconduct. The foregoing right of indemnification shall not be exclusive of other rights to which such Director or officer may be entitled as a matter of law, the Articles of Incorporation, any vote of shareholders or disinterested members of the Board of Directors, or otherwise.

EX-99.1

Exhibit 99.1

Diebold Contacts
Media Relations	Investor Relations
Mike Jacobsen, APR	Steve Virostek
+1 330 490-3796	+1 330 490-6319
michael.jacobsen@diebold.com	stephen.virostek@diebold.com

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

Aug. 15, 2016

DIEBOLD COMPLETES WINCOR NIXDORF ACQUISITION

NORTH CANTON, Ohio, USA – Diebold, Incorporated (NYSE: DBD) today announced that it has successfully completed the acquisition of Wincor Nixdorf AG through its voluntary takeover offer for all the company’s ordinary shares. The combined organization will begin operating as Diebold Nixdorf on Tuesday, Aug. 16.

Offer consideration and other transaction details

Under the terms of the takeover offer, Wincor Nixdorf shareholders received €38.98 in cash plus 0.434 Diebold common shares in exchange for each Wincor Nixdorf share. The total offer consideration consists of approximately €891.7 million in cash and 9,928,514 newly issued Diebold common shares. To the extent that Wincor Nixdorf shareholders are entitled to fractional shares, those fractional entitlements will be aggregated and sold in the market and the proceeds of such sale distributed pro rata no later than Aug. 29, 2016.

The Diebold common shares issued to Wincor Nixdorf shareholders commenced trading on the NYSE under the symbol DBD, and all Diebold common shares commenced trading on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under ISIN US2536511031 (symbol DBD).

In the United Kingdom, the Diebold and Wincor Nixdorf brands and operations will remain distinct pending completion of the Competition and Markets Authority’s review of the transaction.

Financing, synergy targets and capital allocation plans

The cash portion of the offer consideration is being financed with funds available under Diebold, Incorporated’s existing credit agreement and net proceeds from the issuance and sale of its senior notes due 2024. Diebold Nixdorf expects to report pro forma net debt/EBITDAⁱ of less than 4x as of September 30, 2016. The combined organization plans to deliver approximately $160 million of annual cost synergies and is targeting a non-GAAP operating margin in excess of 9 percent by the end of the third full year following the closing of the takeover offer. The realization of these synergies and Diebold Nixdorf’s focus on deleveraging its balance sheet is expected to result in net debt/EBITDA below 3x by the end of the third full year. The combined company currently intends to pay a dividend per share at a rate of approximately one-third of Diebold’s current annual cash dividend per share, subject to market and other conditions, expected to be paid on a quarterly basis. Paying regular dividends remains a part of Diebold Nixdorf’s philosophy of returning value to shareholders.

About Diebold

Diebold, Incorporated (NYSE: DBD) provides the technology, software and services that connect people around the world with their money—bridging the physical and digital worlds of cash conveniently, securely and efficiently. Since its founding in 1859, Diebold has evolved to become a leading provider of exceptional self-service innovation, security and services to financial, commercial, retail and other markets.

Diebold has approximately 15,000 employees worldwide and is headquartered near Canton, Ohio, USA. Visit Diebold at www.diebold.com or on Twitter: http://twitter.com/DieboldInc.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT ABOUT FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Certain statements contained in this communication regarding matters that are not historical facts are forward-looking statements (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). These include statements regarding management’s intentions, plans, beliefs, expectations or forecasts for the future including, without limitation, the business combination with Wincor Nixdorf. Such forward-looking statements are based on the current expectations of Diebold and involve risks and uncertainties; consequently, actual results may differ materially from those expressed or implied in the statements. Such forward-looking statements may include statements about the acquisition of Wincor Nixdorf, the effects of the acquisition on the businesses and financial conditions of Diebold or Wincor Nixdorf, including synergies, pro forma revenue, targeted operating margin, net debt to EBITDA ratios, accretion to earnings and other financial or operating measures. By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industries in which the combined company operates may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this document. In addition, risks and uncertainties related to the acquisition include, but are not limited to, the ability to successfully integrate the businesses of Diebold and Wincor Nixdorf, the timing, receipt and terms and conditions of any governmental and regulatory approvals that could reduce anticipated benefits or cause the parties to abandon the business combination, risks associated with the impact of the business combination agreement, the contemplated domination and profit and loss transfer agreement and any related litigation may have on the business and operations of the combined company, risks related to disruption of management time from ongoing business operations due to the acquisition, and the risk that the acquisition could have an adverse effect on the ability of the combined company to retain and hire key personnel and maintain relationships with its suppliers, and on its operating results and businesses generally. These risks, as well as other risks are more fully discussed in Diebold’s reports filed with the SEC and available at the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Any forward-looking statements speak only as at the date of this document. Except as required by applicable law, neither Diebold nor Wincor Nixdorf undertakes any obligation to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

ⁱ  Expected pro forma net debt/EBITDA includes contributions from both Diebold, Incorporated and Wincor Nixdorf as if both companies were operating as a single entity for the 12 months ending September 30, 2016. Net debt is defined as long-term debt plus short-term debt minus cash and cash equivalents. Diebold’s management believes that given the significant cash, cash equivalents and other investments on its balance sheet that net cash against outstanding debt is a meaningful net debt calculation. Diebold defines EBITDA as net (loss) income excluding income tax (benefit) expense, net interest, and depreciation and amortization expense. Diebold defines Adjusted EBITDA as EBITDA before the effect of the following items: income from discontinued operations, net of tax, share-based compensation, foreign exchange loss, net, other (expense) income miscellaneous, net, restructuring expense, and non-routine expenses, net. These are non-GAAP financial measurements used by management to enhance the understanding of our operating results. EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA are key measures Diebold uses to evaluate our operational performance. Diebold provides EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA because it believes that investors and securities analysts will find EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA to be useful measures for evaluating Diebold’s operating performance and comparing its operating performance with that of similar companies that have different capital structures and for evaluating Diebold’s ability to meet its future debt service, capital expenditures, and working capital requirements. However, EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as alternatives to net income as a measure of operating results or as alternatives to cash flows from operating activities as a measure of liquidity in accordance with GAAP.

###

PR/16-3783

EX-99.2

Exhibit 99.2

PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS TRANSLATION OF THE GERMAN CONTRACT REPORT IS FOR CONVENIENCE PURPOSES ONLY. IN CASE OF DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE GERMAN ORIGINAL AND THE ENGLISH TRANSLATION ONLY THE GERMAN VERSION SHALL PREVAIL. NEITHER DIEBOLD GERMAN HOLDINGS INC. & CO. KGAA NOR WINCOR NIXDORF AG ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR ANY MISTAKES, OMISSIONS OR OTHER INACCURACIES CONTAINED IN THIS TRANSLATION.

 

CONTRACT REPORT

JOINT REPORT

of the management board of

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn,

and

the management of

Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, Eschborn,

pursuant to Section 293a of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz)

concerning the Domination and Profit-and-Loss Transfer Agreement between

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft and Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA

August 16, 2016

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Table of Contents

I.	INTRODUCTION	1
II.	THE PARTIES	3
1.	Wincor Nixdorf AG and the Wincor Nixdorf Group	3
1.1	Overview	3
1.2	Corporate history and development	4
1.3	Legal form, registered office, fiscal year and corporate purpose	5
1.4	Share capital, shareholders and trading on the stock exchange	6
1.5	Boards of Wincor Nixdorf AG	11
1.6	Structure of the Wincor Nixdorf Group	13
1.7	Business activities of the Wincor Nixdorf Group	13
1.8	Development of the business and earnings situation of Wincor Nixdorf Group	14
1.9	Employees and co-determination	19
2.	Diebold Inc. and the Diebold Group	19
2.1	Overview	19
2.2	Corporate history and development	21
2.3	Legal form, registered office, fiscal year and corporate purpose	23
2.4	Share Capital, shareholders and trading on the stock exchange	24
2.5	Corporate bodies of Diebold Inc.	26
2.6	Structure of the Diebold Group	28
2.7	Business activities of the Diebold Group	29
2.8	Development of the business and earnings situation of the Diebold Group	30
2.9	Employees	35
2.10	Takeover Offer and further acquisitions of the Diebold Group	35
3.	Diebold KGaA	37
3.1	Overview	37
3.2	Legal form, registered office, fiscal year and corporate purpose	37
3.3	Limited partner’s capital contribution and general partner	38
3.4	Corporate bodies and representation	38

i

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

3.5	Business activities and participations	39
3.6	Earnings situation and financial position of Diebold KGaA as of December 31, 2015	39
3.7	Employees and employee representation	40
3.8	Financial funding of Diebold KGaA for fulfilment of its obligations under the Agreement	40
III.	REASONS FOR ENTERING INTO THE DOMINATION AND PROFIT-AND-LOSS TRANSFER AGREEMENT	42
1.	Economic and legal reasons	42
1.1	Aiming to create a joint company	42
1.2	Limits and restrictions on cooperation in the current de facto corporate group	44
1.3	Creation of a contractual corporate group by concluding the domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement	45
2.	Tax reasons	48
3.	Alternatives	49
3.1	Entering into an isolated domination agreement or an isolated profit-and-loss transfer agreement	50
3.2	Entering into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement with Diebold Inc.	50
3.3	Exclusion of the minority shareholders (squeeze-out)	51
3.4	Integration	51
3.5	Merger	52
3.6	Change of legal form	52
4.	Conclusion	53
IV.	DOMINATION AND PROFIT-AND-LOSS TRANSFER AGREEMENT	53
1.	Explanation of the content of the contract	53
1.1	Managerial control (Article 1 of the Agreement)	53
1.2	Transfer of profit (Article 2 of the Agreement)	55
1.3	Assumption of losses (Article 3 of the Agreement)	57
1.4	Recurring Compensation (Article 4 of the Agreement)	58
1.5	Exit Compensation (Article 5 of the Agreement)	68
1.6	Right to Information (Article 6 of the Agreement)	73
1.7	Effectiveness and term (Article 7 of the Agreement)	74

ii

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

1.8	Guarantee (Article 8 of the Agreement)	77
1.9	Miscellaneous (Article 9 of the Agreement)	79
2.	Payment of the Recurring Compensation and the Exit Compensation (technical processing by the banks)	80
3.	Legal effects on outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders	80
3.1	Legal effects	80
3.2	Protection of outside shareholders	85
4.	Tax effects on outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders	88
4.1	Preliminary remarks	88
4.2	Taxation of Recurring Compensation Payments at the level of shareholders	89
4.3	Taxation of Exit Compensation at the level of shareholders	91
5.	Tax effects on Wincor Nixdorf AG	95
6.	Cost of the domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement	96
V.	TYPE AND AMOUNT OF THE RECURRING COMPENSATION AND THE EXIT COMPENSATION PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 304 AND 305 OF THE STOCK CORPORATION ACT	96
1.	Overview	96
2.	Determination and setting of the amount of the adequate Recurring Compensation Payment pursuant to Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act	100
3.	Determination and setting of the amount of the adequate Exit Compensation pursuant to Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act	101
VI.	CONTRACT AUDIT	102

iii

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

List of Annexes

Annex 1:	List of shareholdings of the Wincor Nixdorf Group as of December 31, 2015 pursuant to Section 313 para. 2 of the German Commercial Code
Annex 2:	List of shareholdings of the Diebold Group as of December 31, 2015
Annex 3:	Final draft of the Domination and Profit-and-Loss Transfer Agreement between Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft and Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA together with the Guarantee from Diebold, Incorporated
Annex 4:	Order by the District Court (Landgericht) of Dortmund dated June 1, 2016 on the appointment of ADKL AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft as expert auditor (Contract Auditor) within the meaning of Section 293b (1) of the Stock Corporation Act
Annex 5:	Expert opinion of PricewaterhouseCoopers Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main of August 16, 2016 on the calculation of the value of Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft as of September 26, 2016

iv

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The management board of Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft (“Wincor Nixdorf AG” and together with the subsidiaries affiliated with Wincor Nixdorf AG pursuant to Section 17 of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz, “Stock Corporation Act”), the “Wincor Nixdorf Group” (Wincor Nixdorf-Konzern)) and the management of Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA (“Diebold KGaA”) are jointly issuing the following report (Vertragsbericht, “Report”) pursuant to Section 293a of the Stock Corporation Act with regards to the proposed domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement (Beherrschungs- und Gewinnabführungsvertrag) (in its final draft and as executed copy, each the “Agreement”) between Diebold KGaA as the controlling company and Wincor Nixdorf AG as the controlled company (together the “Parties” (Vertragsparteien)), the final draft of which as to be presented to the extraordinary shareholders’ meetings of both Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold KGaA is attached to this Report as Annex 3.

I. INTRODUCTION

On November 23, 2015, Diebold, Incorporated with its registered seat in North Canton, Ohio, United States of America (“Diebold Inc.”, together with the dependent group companies of Diebold Inc. within the meaning of Section 17 of the Stock Corporation Act , excluding the Wincor Nixdorf Group, the “Diebold Group” (Diebold-Gruppe)), the sole general partner and limited liability shareholder of Diebold KGaA, published its decision to launch a voluntary public takeover offer to all shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG (Wincor Nixdorf-Aktionäre, “Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders”). Previously on the same day, Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. entered into a business combination agreement (Grundsatzvereinbarung, “Business Combination Agreement”). On February 5, 2016, Diebold Inc. published a voluntary public takeover offer (Übernahmeangebot, “Takeover Offer”) to all Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders for the acquisition of their ordinary bearer shares without par value, each representing a notional value of €1.00 in the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf (Wincor Nixdorf-Aktien, “Wincor Nixdorf Shares”). The settlement of the Takeover Offer was, inter alia, subject to the condition that a minimum acceptance level of at least 22,362,159 Wincor Nixdorf Shares (this corresponds to about 67.6% of all Wincor Nixdorf Shares existing as of the date of approval of publishing the offer document by the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin), which corresponds to a threshold of more than 75% of the voting rights of Wincor Nixdorf AG excluding treasury shares of Wincor Nixdorf AG) would be met.

-1-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The acceptance period expired on March 22, 2016 at 24:00 hours. The additional acceptance period commenced on March 30, 2016 and expired on April 12, 2016 at 24:00 hours. Until expiration of the additional acceptance period, the Takeover Offer has been accepted for 22,876,760 Wincor Nixdorf Shares in total, which corresponds to 69.1% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG. In addition, 241,324 voting rights of Wincor Nixdorf Shares were attributed to Diebold KGaA pursuant to Section 30 of the German Takeover Act (WpÜG) at the end of the additional acceptance period, which were counted when calculating the acceptance level. In total, this is equivalent to about 69.9% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG (including the Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares held indirectly by Wincor Nixdorf AG).

In the course of the settlement of the Takeover Offer, the tendered Wincor Nixdorf Shares were, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Takeover Offer, transferred directly into a securities deposit account of Diebold KGaA without any prior acquisition or temporary purchase (Vor- oder Durchgangserwerb) by Diebold Inc. As of the date of signing of this Report, Diebold KGaA and Diebold Inc. directly and indirectly hold 22,876,760 Wincor Nixdorf Shares in total. This corresponds to a direct and indirect participation of 69.1% of the current share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG, which is divided into 33,084,988 shares, and to a proportion of 76.7% of the voting rights of Wincor Nixdorf AG (excluding the Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares, which carry no voting rights pursuant to Section 71b of the Stock Corporation Act).

On April 8, 2016, Diebold Inc. and Diebold KGaA announced that they intend to enter into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement with Diebold KGaA as controlling company and Wincor Nixdorf AG as controlled company. By the resolution dated May 2, 2016, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG formally resolved to enter into negotiations with Diebold Inc. and Diebold KGaA regarding such an agreement.

In response to a joint application by the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA, the District Court (Landgericht) of Dortmund by order dated June 1, 2016, selected and appointed ADKL AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Breite Straße 29-31, 40213 Düsseldorf, Germany, as joint contract auditor (Vertragsprüfer) (the “Contract Auditor” or “ADKL”) for the examination of the Agreement.

-2-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Subject to the approval of the shareholder meetings of both Parties, this Agreement, which is the subject matter of the Report at hand, is expected be entered into on September 26, 2016. The management of Diebold KGaA and both the management and supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG have approved the final draft of the Agreement on August 16, 2016. At the time the resolution was adopted, the final draft of the Agreement, a final draft of this Report, the expert opinion (Bewertungsgutachten) (the “Valuation Report”) by PricewaterhouseCoopers Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main, Germany (the “Valuation Expert” (Bewertungsgutachter) or “PwC”) dated August 16, 2016, and report by the Contract Auditor concerning the examination of the Agreement (Prüfbericht) (the “Audit Report”) were available to the supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG. Diebold Inc. issued a guarantee regarding the Agreement to Wincor Nixdorf AG on August 16, 2016, a copy of which was likewise made available to the supervisory board in its meeting held on August 16, 2016.

According to the Agreement, Wincor Nixdorf AG subordinates its management to Diebold KGaA and undertakes to transfer all of its profits to Diebold KGaA. Diebold KGaA undertakes to compensate any loss incurred by Wincor Nixdorf AG and to grant an adequate recurring compensation (Ausgleich) and an adequate exit compensation payment (Abfindung) to outside shareholders.

Pursuant to Section 293 para. 1 and para. 2 of the Stock Corporation Act, the effectiveness of the Agreement is subject to the approval of the shareholders’ meetings of both Parties. The shareholders’ meetings of both Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf AG are expected to resolve on the approval of the Agreement on September 26, 2016. The same applies to Diebold Inc.’s consent pursuant to Section 285 para. 2 clause 1 of the Stock Corporation Act, as to be granted in its role as general partner of Diebold KGaA. Pursuant to Section 294 para. 2 of the Stock Corporation Act, the Agreement will become effective upon its registration with the commercial register (Handelsregister) at the registered office of Wincor Nixdorf.

II. THE PARTIES

1. Wincor Nixdorf AG and the Wincor Nixdorf Group

1.1 Overview

Wincor Nixdorf AG is a listed stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) with its registered seat in Paderborn, Germany. Wincor Nixdorf AG is the holding company of the Wincor Nixdorf Group consisting of Wincor Nixdorf AG itself as well as its subsidiaries. The Wincor Nixdorf Group is a global leading provider of IT solutions and services for retail banks and trading companies.

-3-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The business of Wincor Nixdorf Group is divided into the operative segments retail banks (“Banking”) and trading companies (“Retail”). The business model aims at efficiently assisting banks and trading companies with the successful adjustment of their businesses to the demands of the digital age and at supporting the continuous improvement of their business processes by implementing reliable IT solutions. In this context, one of the key responsibilities is to link digital and stationary distribution channels in order to promote business. For this purpose, the Wincor Nixdorf Group offers a comprehensive spectrum of automated and electronic solutions in the banking and trading markets, which covers the key steps in the process of change affecting business systems. This selection is supported by product-related services and concepts involving the operation of specific branch IT processes by the Wincor Nixdorf Group, and outsourcing services where the Wincor Nixdorf Group is responsible for the correct operation of those systems. In this manner, the Wincor Nixdorf Group helps its customers to be more efficient and user-friendly while reducing their process costs.

On June 30, 2016, the Wincor Nixdorf Group employed worldwide 9,643 full-time employees, of which approximately 75% are located in Europe. The Wincor Nixdorf Group is acting directly or through affiliates in more than 130 countries throughout the world. The production sites are located in Germany and China. Research and development primarily takes place in Germany, Poland, Singapore, and China.

The webpage of Wincor Nixdorf AG is available at http://www.wincor-nixdorf.com.

1.2 Corporate history and development

The roots of the current business activity of today’s Wincor Nixdorf Group date back to the year 1952 when Heinz Nixdorf laid the foundation for Nixdorf Computer AG. In the time leading up to the mid-1980’s, he grew his company into the fourth-largest computer group in Europe.

In 1990, four years after Nixdorf’s death, Nixdorf Computer AG was taken over by Siemens AG, and the company “Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme AG” was born. The “Retail Solutions” and “Banking Solutions” divisions were integrated into the Siemens organization. Following

-4-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

reorganizations and rationalization within Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme AG from 1992 to 1994, the first great wave of expansion followed in 1995. The range of products and services was extended and internationalization was driven further forward. In 1996 and 1997, the company experienced massive growth and business segments such as Enterprise Solutions and product solutions for lottery companies came into being.

1998 saw the formation of the independent company “Siemens Nixdorf Retail and Banking Systems GmbH” as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Siemens Nixdorf Informationssysteme AG. Increasing emphasis was placed on the development of software solutions for the retail and banking segment, as well as the production of associated systems and equipment.

The carve-out from Siemens group occurred in 1999 in the wake of the sale to private equity firms Kohlberg Kravis Roberts and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners. The current Wincor Nixdorf AG was founded as a limited liability company under the company name of “AB 9916 Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH” with its registered office in Munich, Germany on the basis of its articles of association which have been enacted on July 2, 1999. As of October 1, 1999, the company commenced its business operations. In the same year, the company changed its legal name to “Wincor Nixdorf 1. Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH” and the registered office was moved to Paderborn, Germany. In 2000, the company’s legal name was changed to “WINCOR NIXDORF Holding GmbH”.

On May 5, 2004, the company was converted into a stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) under the legal name of “Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft”. The initial public offering took place on May 19, 2004. Since then, the shares are traded on Frankfurt Stock Exchange’s Prime Standard.

1.3 Legal form, registered office, fiscal year and corporate purpose

Wincor Nixdorf AG is a German stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) with its registered seat in Paderborn, Germany, registered in the commercial register (Handelsregister) of the local court (Amtsgericht) of Paderborn under docket number HRB 6846. The domestic business address is Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1, 33106 Paderborn, Germany. The fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG commences on October 1 of each calendar year and ends on September 30 of each subsequent calendar year. The management board and the supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG consider to recommend resolving on a harmonization of the fiscal year with the calendar year to the shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG in the next ordinary general shareholders’ meeting.

-5-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Section 2 of the articles of association of Wincor Nixdorf AG describes the corporate purpose of Wincor Nixdorf AG as follows:

(1) The object of the company is to manage a group of associated companies based both within and outside of Germany that operate in research, development, production, sales, installation and leasing in connection with products and solutions in the fields of electronic information processing, information transfer and other innovative technology systems and also provide consulting, training and other services related to this business.

(2) The company may itself operate in the aforementioned areas or restrict its activities to the management of its holdings.

(3) The company may conduct any business or undertake any actions that are appropriate for directly or indirectly fulfilling the object of the company. In this respect, the company may found, take over or acquire an interest in other companies. The company may set up other branches under the same or a different name within or outside of Germany.

1.4 Share capital, shareholders and trading on the stock exchange

1.4.1 Share capital

The issued share capital amounts to €33,084,988.00 and is divided into 33,084,988 bearer shares without par value with each share representing a notional value in the share capital of €1.00.

1.4.2 Authorized capital

The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is authorized, with the consent of the supervisory board, to increase the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG by up to a total of €16,542,494.00 on one or several occasions by issuing new no-par-value bearer shares against cash contributions and/or contributions in kind (Genehmigtes Kapital 2014, “Authorized Capital 2014”) on or before January 19, 2019. The shareholders shall be granted pre-emptive subscription rights.

-6-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

However, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is authorized, with the consent of the supervisory board

• to exclude fractions from the subscription rights of the shareholders.

• to exclude the subscription right of shareholders if the issue amount of the new shares is not significantly less than the stock market price. This authorization, however, is only valid with the stipulation that the stocks issued with the exclusion of the subscription right in accordance with Section 186 para. 3, sentence 4 of the Stock Corporation Act may not exceed a total of 10% of the existing share capital at the time of the resolution or – insofar as this is less – at the time of the use of the authorization. As far as shares or rights that entitle to the subscription of shares of Wincor Nixdorf are issued or sold since the granting of the authorization, that is, since January 20, 2014, with the exclusion of the subscription rights in accordance with Section 186 para. 3, sentence 4 of the Stock Corporation Act, these are taken into account in respect of the limitation of 10% of the share capital.

• to exclude the subscription rights of the shareholders with the approval of the supervisory board for issuing shares against contributions in kind for the purposes of (also indirect) acquisition of companies, parts of companies or investments in companies, whereby in this case the exclusion of the subscription right is restricted to a maximum of 20% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf at the time of the resolution or – insofar as this is less – at the time of the use of the authorization.

The authorizations for the exclusion of subscription rights described above are only valid with the stipulation that since the granting of these authorizations on January 20, 2014, on the basis of this or other authorizations for the issuance or sale of shares of Wincor Nixdorf or of rights that entitle to the subscription of shares of Wincor Nixdorf AG, shares issued with the exclusion of the subscription right in accordance with or in corresponding application of Section 186 para. 3 of the Stock Corporate Act may, in total, not amount to more than 20% of the existing share capital at the time of the resolution or – insofar as this is less – at the time of the use of the authorization.

-7-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

1.4.3 Conditional Capital

(i) Conditional Capital 2013

The share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG is conditionally increased by up to €10,000,000.00 and is divided into up to 10,000,000 bearer shares (Bedingtes Kapital 2013, “Conditional Capital 2013”). The conditional capital increase is to be used to grant option rights or option obligations, in accordance with the option conditions, to the holders of warrants from participatory certificates with warrants and/or bonds with warrants or to grant conversion rights or conversion obligations, in accordance with the conversion conditions, to the holders of convertible participatory certificates and/or convertible bonds that are issued by Wincor Nixdorf AG or a dependent group company of Wincor Nixdorf AG within the meaning of Section 17 of the Stock Corporation Act by January 20, 2018, pursuant to the authorization adopted by the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG on January 21, 2013 under item 7(a). The new shares shall be issued at the option or conversion price to be defined in accordance with the above authorization adopted. The conditional capital increase shall be carried out only in the event of the issuing of participatory certificates with warrants and/or convertible participatory certificates and/or bonds with warrants and/or convertible bonds insofar as the holders of participatory certificates with warrants and/or convertible participatory certificates and/or bonds with warrants and/or convertible bonds make use of their option or conversion rights or, if they have conversion/option obligations, fulfill their conversion/option obligation and if the conditional capital is required under the terms and conditions of the participatory certificates with warrants and/or convertible participatory certificates and/or bonds with warrants and/or convertible bonds. The new shares issued pursuant to exercise of the option or conversion right shall carry dividend rights from the beginning of the fiscal year in which they are issued. If they are issued before the general shareholders’ meeting, the new shares shall be entitled to dividends for the previous fiscal year as well. The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is authorized, with the consent of the supervisory board, to further define the details of the conditional capital increase. The supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is further authorized to amend the wording of Section 4 para. 8 of the Articles of Association of Wincor Nixdorf AG in accordance with the respective issue of shares and make all connected adaptations to the Articles of Association of Wincor Nixdorf AG that only relate to the wording. The same shall apply if the authorization to issue participatory certificates with warrants or convertible participatory certificates or bonds with warrants or convertible bonds is not used after expiration of the period of authorization and if the conditional capital is not used after expiration of the periods for exercising option or conversion rights.

-8-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

As of the date of signing of this Report, neither Wincor Nixdorf AG nor any of its dependent subsidiaries issued any such equity-linked securities or warrants.

(ii) Conditional Capital 2014

The share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG is conditionally increased by up to €1,654,249.00 through the issuance of up to 1,654,249 new bearer shares, without par value (Bedingtes Kapital 2014, “Conditional Capital 2014”).

This conditional capital is to be used exclusively to cover stock options issued to members of the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG, board members of subordinate affiliated companies within and outside of Germany and to other executives and employees of Wincor Nixdorf AG and its subordinate affiliated companies, as specified in detail in the authorization resolved by the general shareholders’ meeting on January 20, 2014 and in accordance with the authorization by the general shareholders’ meeting on January 20, 2014 as amended by the general shareholders’ meeting on January 25, 2016. It will only be used to the extent that holders of share options exercise their right to subscribe for Wincor Nixdorf Shares and Wincor Nixdorf AG does not provide the consideration in cash or by means of its own shares. The new shares will carry dividend rights from the beginning of the fiscal year in which they are issued. Should the issuance take place before the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting, the new shares will be entitled to dividends for the previous fiscal year as well.

As of June 30, 2016 Wincor Nixdorf AG had issued a total of 2,684,455 stock options as part of several stock option plans (Wincor Nixdorf-Aktienoptionspläne) (the “Wincor Nixdorf Stock Option Plans”). In case stock options under the Wincor Nixdorf Stock Option Plans are being exercised, Wincor Nixdorf AG may, at its election, deliver shares or make cash payments to settle the options.

In light of the Takeover Offer, the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG resolved on January 25, 2016 to authorize the management board and the supervisory board to make certain changes to the terms of the outstanding stock options and the stock options to be granted in the future

-9-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

1.4.4 Treasury shares

Currently, Wincor Nixdorf AG indirectly holds a total of 3,268,777 Wincor Nixdorf Shares (approximately 9.88%) from prior fiscal years’ buyback programs as treasury shares through its wholly owned, indirect subsidiary Wincor Nixdorf Facility GmbH (the “Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares”). The repurchased shares are to be used for all legitimate purposes and for those covered by the authorization issued by the general shareholders’ meeting, in particular for the purpose of settling obligations arising from share options already issued or to be issued to members of the management board, other managers or staff members of Wincor Nixdorf AG and/or subordinated affiliated entities on the basis of the authorization granted for the issuance of share options.

1.4.5 Shareholders

According to the notifications regarding voting rights (Stimmrechtsmitteilungen) as submitted in accordance with the provisions of the German Securities Trading Act (Wertpapierhandelsgesetz) by August 10, 2016, the following shareholders held (directly or indirectly) no less than 3% in the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG:

Title of Class	Name of Notifying Person	Number of Voting Rights Disclosed 1		Stake Attributable to Voting Rights as Disclosed (accounting for treasury shares in the denominator)1
No par value shares	Kiltearn Limited, Edinburgh, Great Britain		3,341,590		10.10	%
No par value shares	Kiltearn Global Equity Fund, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA		1,667,024		5.04	%
No par value shares	Morgan Stanley, Wilmington, Delaware, USA		1,551,930		4.69	%
No par value shares	Syquant Capital, Paris, France		1,131,607		3.42	%
No par value shares	Deutsche Asset & Wealth Management Investment GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany		992,980		3.001	%

From August 15, 2016 on, Diebold KGaA holds 22,876,760 Wincor Nixdorf Shares. This ownership corresponds with a stake of 69.1% in the total share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG and to 76.7% of the voting rights of Wincor Nixdorf AG (excluding Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares, which carry no voting rights pursuant to Section 71b of the Stock Corporation Act).

¹  Statements relate to the voting rights disclosed pursuant to Sec. 21, 22 German Securities Trading Act (including voting rights granted pursuant to Section 22 German Securities Trading Act); multiple accounting for voting rights can therefore not be ruled out.

-10-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

1.4.6 Trading on the stock exchange

Wincor Nixdorf Shares are currently admitted to trading on the regulated market (Regulierter Markt) of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange with additional post-admission obligations (Prime Standard) under the International Securities Identification Number (ISIN) DE000A0CAYB2 and the securities identification number (Wertpapierkennnummer) (WKN) A0CAYB and were listed in the MDAX of the German Stock Exchange (Deutsche Börse) until June 19, 2016. As of June 20, 2016 Wincor Nixdorf Shares are listed in the SDAX of the German Stock Exchange (Deutsche Börse).

1.5 Boards of Wincor Nixdorf AG

1.5.1 Management board

Pursuant to Section 5 of the Articles of Association of Wincor Nixdorf AG, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG consists of two or more members with the exact number to be specified by the supervisory board. The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG currently consists of the following persons:

• Eckard Heidloff (CEO)

• Dr. Jürgen Wunram (CFO, Deputy Chairman of the Management Board)

• Olaf Heyden (Executive Vice President, Services / Member of the Management Board)

• Dr. Ulrich Näher (Executive Vice President, Business Unit Systems / Member of the Management Board)

The supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG plans to expand the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG to six members and to appoint Mr. Stefan E. Merz and one other representative of Diebold Inc. as regular members of the management board following the approval of the general shareholders’ meeting to entering into the domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement.

Pursuant to Section 6 of the Articles of Association of Wincor Nixdorf AG, Wincor Nixdorf AG is represented by two members of the management board or jointly by one member of the management board and an authorized

-11-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

signatory (Prokurist). The supervisory board is entitled to waive the legal prohibition to represent multiple parties as lined out in Section 181 alt. 2 of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB) for all or individual members of the board as well as for any authorized signatory who is authorized to sign jointly with a board member for Wincor Nixdorf AG.

1.5.2 Supervisory board

Pursuant to Section 7 of the Articles of Association of Wincor Nixdorf AG, the supervisory board is composed of twelve members, six of which are elected by the shareholders’ meeting. Pursuant to the German Act on Co-determination of Employees (Mitbestimmungsgesetz, “Co-Determination Act”), the other six members represent the employees. As of the date of signing of this Report, the supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG consists of the following persons:

• Dr. Alexander Dibelius (Chairman)

• Michael Schild (Deputy Chairman)

• Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem

• Dr. Dieter Düsedau

• Dr. Valerie Julia Barth

• Elin Dera

• Hans-Ulrich Holdenried

• Edmund Schaefer

• Reinhard Steinrücke

• Zvezdana Seeger

• Daniela Ueberschär

• Carmelo Zanghi

Zvezdana Seeger, Prof. Dr. Achim Bachem and Hans-Ulrich Holdenried have resigned from the supervisory board with effect from September 30, 2016. The supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG proposed to the extraordinary general meeting to be held on September 26, 2016, to elect Andreas W. Mattes, Christopher A. Chapman and Elizabeth C. Radigan to join the supervisory board with effect from October 1, 2016.

-12-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

1.6 Structure of the Wincor Nixdorf Group

1.6.1 Operative and legal structure

Wincor Nixdorf AG is the holding company of the Wincor Nixdorf Group. It runs the business of the Group and performs the typical administrative tasks of a group holding company. As of June 30, 2016, Wincor Nixdorf AG held a total of 94 direct and indirect participations in other companies which are included in the interim consolidated financial statements.

The operative business is divided into the segments Banking and Retail, which also apply for reporting (Berichterstattung).

1.6.2 Significant subsidiaries; consolidated companies

As of December 31, 2015, the total of fully consolidated companies (including Wincor Nixdorf AG) amounted to 92.

A comprehensive overview of the investments of Wincor Nixdorf AG within the meaning of Section 313 para. 2 of the German Commercial Code (Handelsgesetzbuch, “German Commercial Code”) as of December 31, 2015 has been attached to this Report as Annex 1.

1.7 Business activities of the Wincor Nixdorf Group

Wincor Nixdorf Group is one of the world’s leading providers of IT solutions and services to retail banks and trade companies. The comprehensive service portfolio is designed to optimize business processes within branches of banks and trading companies. This is essentially about reducing complexity and cost, and improving service to the end customer. The Wincor Nixdorf Group also applies its expertise to related industries such as postal services and service station networks.

The Banking segment’s proposition includes hardware, software, IT services, and consulting services. Key elements of the hardware portfolio are ATMs, cash recycling systems, automated teller safes and transaction terminals. Besides software for the operating systems, the Wincor Nixdorf Group offers within the Banking segment software by means of which banks are able to manage processes throughout all distribution channels.

-13-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Through the Retail segment, the Wincor Nixdorf Group also provides hardware, software, IT services, and consulting services. Key elements are programmable ePOS systems or self-checkout systems and relate to the checkout area. The software portfolio allows the entire control of all processes and systems within the branch.

The whole service portfolio is supported by product-related services and concepts involving the operation of specific branch IT processes by the Wincor Nixdorf Group as well as outsourcing services, where the Wincor Nixdorf Group takes over responsibility for the correct operation of those systems.

1.8 Development of the business and earnings situation of Wincor Nixdorf Group

The following selected consolidated financial data for the fiscal years 2012/2013, 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 and for the balance sheet dates of September 30, 2013, 2014 and 2015 have been taken or derived from the consolidated financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf AG for the respective fiscal year. The consolidated financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf AG have been prepared in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as applicable in the European Union and the supplementary commercial regulations applicable under Section 315a para. 1 of the German Commercial Code. The selected consolidated financial data as of June 30, 2016 and for the period from October 1, 2015, to June 30, 2016 have been derived from the unaudited interim financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf AG which have been prepared in accordance with IFRS as applicable in the European Union and the supplementary commercial regulations applicable under Section 315a para. 1 of the German Commercial Code.

1.8.1 Financial information for the fiscal years 2012/2013, 2013/2014 and 2014/2015

Pursuant to the consolidated profit-and-loss statement of Wincor Nixdorf AG for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015, issued in accordance with the IFRS, the revenue amounted to approximately €2.4 billion.

While revenues in the banking segment increased by 1% to €1,582 million (previous year period: €1,566 million), the revenues in the retail segment decreased by 6% to €845 million (previous year period: €903 million). In the fiscal year 2014/2015 operative earnings (earnings from operations before interest, taxes and amortization of goodwill (“EBITA”)) amounted to €22 million after restructuring expenses. These earnings include restructuring

-14-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

expenses of €80 million. Accordingly, the EBITA before restructuring expenses amounted to €102 million. The EBITA of the previous fiscal year 2013/2014 in the amount of €155 million included special effects due to the sale of real estate in Singapur in the amount of €20 million. The EBITA margin (EBITA in percent of revenues) before restructuring expenses decreased by 2.1 percentage points to 4.2% (previous year period: 6.3%). After deduction of restructuring expenses the EBITA margin was 0.9% (previous year period: 6.3%). The earnings before taxes after restructuring expenses decreased by 90% and amounted to €15 million (previous year period: €146 million).

The consolidated earnings per share amounted to €0.22 for fiscal year 2014/2015 and to €3.39 for fiscal year 2013/2014.

Selected data of the consolidated profit-and-loss statement

	Fiscal year ended September 30
	2015			2014			2013
	(in thousands, except share data)
Net sales	€	2,426,995		€	2,469,418		€	2,465,004
Cost of sales	€	(1,993,415	)	€	(1,925,675	)	€	(1,922,312	)
Gross profit	€	433,580		€	543,743		€	542,692
Net profit (loss) on operating activities	€	21,851		€	154,962		€	131,531
Profit before income taxes	€	14,913		€	146,348		€	124,341
Net income (loss)	€	7,772		€	104,100		€	87,849
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests	€	1,306		€	3,215		€	721
Net income (loss) attributable to equity holders of Wincor Nixdorf AG	€	6,466		€	100,885		€	87,128
Shares for calculation of basic earnings per share		29,816			29,796			29,776
Shares for calculation of diluted earnings per share		29,816			29,796			29,776
Basic earnings per share	€	0.22		€	3.39		€	2.93
Diluted earnings per share	€	0.22		€	3.39		€	2.93

Selected balance sheet data

	As of September 30
	2015		2014		2013
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	€	37,838	€	43,584	€	43,174
Current assets	€	931,701	€	979,641	€	853,302
Total assets	€	1,507,234	€	1,539,940	€	1,405,954
Share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG	€	33,085	€	33,085	€	33,085
Equity (incl. non-controlling interests)	€	391,440	€	426,809	€	382,861
Current liabilities	€	919,055	€	887,345	€	804,971
Total equity and liabilities	€	1,507,234	€	1,539,940	€	1,405,954

-15-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Other data (unaudited)

	Fiscal year ended September 30
	2015		2014		2013
Dividends declared and payable per share
in Euros	€	0.00	€	1.75	€	1.48
In $U.S. (1)	$	0.00	$	2.36	$	1.95

(1) Calculated based on the average U.S. dollar exchange rate as published in the consolidated financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

1.8.2 Financial information as of June 30, 2016 or for the period from October 1, 2015 until June 30, 2016 respectively

Pursuant to the unaudited consolidated profit-and-loss-statement of Wincor Nixdorf AG for the period from October 1, 2015 until June 30, 2016, prepared according to IFRS, the sales revenue amounted to approximately €1.9 billion, the earnings from operating activity before financial revenues and expenses and taxes (EBIT) to €129.5 million and the earnings before income taxes to €125.8 million.

Selected data of the consolidated profit-and-loss statement

	Nine-month period ended June 30
	2016			2015			2014(1)
	(in thousands, except share data)
Net sales	€	1,938,356		€	1,768,072		€	1,802,731
Cost of sales	€	(1,475,413	)	€	(1,421,641	)	€	(1,405,552	)
Gross profit	€	462,943		€	346,431		€	397,179
Net profit (loss) on operating activities	€	129,529		€	39,792		€	91,628
Net income (loss)	€	89,054		€	24,749		€	60,469
Net income (loss) attributable to non-controlling interests	€	919		€	1,105		€	2,027
Net income (loss) attributable to equity holders of Wincor Nixdorf AG	€	88,135		€	23,644		€	58,442
Shares for calculation of basic earnings per share		29,816			29,816			29,790
Shares for calculation of diluted earnings per share		29,816			29,816			29,790
Basic earnings per share	€	2.96		€	0.79		€	1.96
Diluted earnings per share	€	2.96		€	0.79		€	1.96

(1) Derived from the nine-month report for the year 2014/2015

-16-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Selected balance sheet data

	Nine-month period ended June 30
	2016		2015(1)
	(in thousands)
Cash and cash equivalents	€	86,580	€	46,557
Current assets	€	1,031,976	€	937,763
Total assets	€	1,637,468	€	1,499,516
Share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG	€	33,085	€	33,085
Equity (incl. non-controlling interests)	€	452,965	€	418,201
Current liabilities	€	928,984	€	876,537
Total equity and liabilities	€	1,637,468	€	1,499,516

(1) Derived from the nine-month report for the year 2014/2015

1.8.3 Development of the business and earnings situation for the period from October 1, 2015 until June 30, 2016

After a declining trend in the previous fiscal year Wincor Nixdorf Group has re-entered a phase of recovery during the current fiscal year, capitalizing on restructuring and realignment measures in respect of its business as initiated in the context of its so-called Delta program.

Developments in the first nine months of the fiscal year 2015/2016 have confirmed the positive expectations communicated at the beginning of the year. During this period Wincor Nixdorf Group increased revenue by 10%. In particular sales revenue amounted to €1,938 million (previous year period €1,768 million). The earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization of goodwill, product know-how and tangible assets and licenses („EBITDA“) amounted to €191 million before transaction expenses from the business combination with Diebold Inc. and €174 million after transaction expenses from the business combination with Diebold Inc. (previous year period €80 million).

Revenue in the banking segment increased by 1% to €1,164 million (previous year period €1,149 million). After one-time effects, the banking segment EBITA amounted to €99 million. Excluding expenses from one-time effects of €9 million, the segment EBITA increased to €108 million (previous year period €52 million).

In the retail segment revenue increased by 25% in the first nine months of the ongoing fiscal year, which amounted to €774 million (previous year: €619 million). The segment EBITDA, which includes offsetting one-time effects, increased by €24 million in the reporting period compared with the same period of the previous year to €47 million (previous year period €23 million).

-17-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

In the first nine months of the fiscal year sales revenue attributable to the hardware business increased in the reporting period compared with the same period of the previous year by 17% to €851 million (previous year: €726 million). Sales revenue from the software/services business increased by 4% to €1,087 million (previous year period €1,042 million). The share of sales revenue generated by the hardware business could be increased to 44% during the reporting period (previous year period 41%). Correspondingly, the proportion software/services business share decreased to 56% (previous year period 59%).

During the ongoing fiscal year Wincor Nixdorf AG expanded its software-related services business in the scope of acquisition activity, in particular, by acquiring 51% of the shares in Projective NV, Belgium, a company specializing in program and project management for the financial services sector, and by acquiring the joint venture Winservice AS, Oslo. Prior to this, the IT services business was expanded by acquiring the Netherland activities of Brink’s. In addition, Wincor Nixdorf AG entered into an agreement with a mineral oil group regarding the provision of information technology services for more than 15,000 gas stations. In this context two gas station support companies domiciled in Cologne and Cracow, Poland, were acquired. These entities are, amongst other things, responsible for operating and updating the software applied to the processing of payment transactions at gas stations throughout Europe.

(i) Results of operations

Results of operations

	Nine-month period ended June 30
	2016			2015			Change
	(in thousands)
Net sales	€	1,938,356		€	1,768,072			9.6	%
Cost of sales	€	(1,475,413	)	€	(1,421,641	)		3.8	%
Gross profit	€	462,943		€	346,431			33.6	%
Net profit (loss) on operating activities	€	129,529		€	39,792			225.5	%
Net income (loss) attributable to equity holders of Wincor Nixdorf AG	€	88,135		€	23,644			272.8	%

-18-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(ii) Financial situation

Assets (significant items)

	As of June 30
	2016		2015(1)
	(in millions)
Intangible assets	€	373	€	355
Property, plant and equipment and investments	€	126	€	127
Non-current receivables and assets	€	106	€	79
Balance sheet total	€	1,637	€	1,500

(1) Derived from the nine-month report for the year 2014/2015

Liabilities (significant items)

	As of June 30
	2016		2015(1)
	(in millions)
Equity (including non-controlling interests)	€	453	€	418
Non-current liabilities	€	255	€	205
Current liabilities	€	929	€	877
Balance sheet total	€	1,637	€	1,500

(1) Derived from the nine-month report for the year 2014/2015

1.9 Employees and co-determination

1.9.1 Employees

As of June 30 2016, Wincor Nixdorf Group employed 9,643 employees in total, with 3,601 in Germany, 4,060 in other parts of Europe, 1,428 in the Asia/Pacific/Africa region and 554 in the Americas.

1.9.2 Co-determination

The supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is composed in accordance with the provisions of the Co-Determination Act. It consists of twelve members, six of whom are elected by the employees pursuant to the provisions of the Co-Determination Act.

2. Diebold Inc. and the Diebold Group

2.1 Overview

The Diebold Group provides the services, software and technology that connect people around the world with their cash flows—bridging the physical and digital worlds of cash conveniently, securely and efficiently. Diebold Inc. was incorporated under the laws of the state of Ohio in August 1876, succeeding a proprietorship established in 1859. Since then the Diebold Group has become a leading provider of exceptional self-service innovation, security and services to financial, retail, commercial and other markets. The Diebold Group has approximately 15,000 employees and does business in more than 90 countries worldwide.

-19-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Diebold Inc. initiated a multi-year transformation, “Diebold 2.0”, with the primary objective of transforming itself into a worldwide leading, services-led and software-enabled company, supported by innovative hardware, which automates the way people connect with their money.

Diebold 2.0 consists of four pillars:

• Cost—Streamline the cost structure and improve near-term delivery and execution.

• Cash—Generate increased free cash flow in order to fund the investments necessary to drive profitable growth, while preserving the ability to return value to shareholders in the form of secure dividends and, as appropriate, share repurchases.

• Talent—Attract and retain the talent necessary to drive innovation and the focused execution of the transformation strategy.

• Growth—Return Diebold to a sustainable, profitable growth trajectory.

Diebold 2.0 is supposed to occur in three phases: 1) Crawl, 2) Walk, and 3) Run. As part of the transformation, Diebold Inc. has identified targeted savings of $200 million that are expected to be fully realized by the end of 2017 and plans to reinvest approximately 50% of the cost savings to drive long-term growth.

During the “Crawl” phase, Diebold Inc. was primarily focused on taking costs out of the business and reallocating a portion of these savings as reinvestments in systems and processes. Diebold Inc. engaged Accenture in a multi-year outsourcing agreement to provide finance, accounting and procurement business process services. Cost savings, along with working capital improvements, resulted in a significant increase of free cash flow. With respect to human resources, Diebold Inc. attracted new leaders from top technology and services companies. Through increased collaboration with customers, Diebold Inc. has also improved its growth trajectories in its FSS (financial self-service) and Security businesses.

-20-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Since the middle of 2015, Diebold Inc. has been in the “Walk” phase of Diebold 2.0 whereby Diebold Inc. will continue to build on each pillar of cost, cash, talent and growth. The main difference in the “Walk” phase is a greater emphasis on the increase of the mix of revenue from services and software, as well as shaping the business activities of Diebold Inc.

The website of Diebold Inc. can be accessed at http://www.dieboldnixdorf.com.

2.2 Corporate history and development

Diebold Inc. was founded as a proprietorship in 1859 in Cincinnati, Ohio producing safes and vaults and was known at the time as the Diebold Bahmann Safe Company. After relocating to Canton, Ohio in 1872, Diebold, Inc. was incorporated in August 1876 as the successor of the proprietorship. In 1936, Diebold Inc. expanded its product line by acquiring companies that specialized in products such as rotary, visible and indexing files, and microfilming systems. Diebold Inc. became a publicly traded company in the 1930s and was listed on the New York Stock Exchange in 1964. In 1973, Diebold Inc. introduced its Total Automatic Banking System 500 (TABS 500).

In January 1994, as part of the strategy of Diebold Inc. to develop its international competitiveness by actively seeking acquisitions, joint ventures and strategic alliances throughout the world, Diebold Inc. acquired the ATM distribution and certain affiliated businesses of Hidromex, S.A. de C.V., to form Diebold Mexico, S.A. de C.V., which is engaged in the distribution and service of ATMs and certain other products in the Mexican market. Diebold Inc. also acquired a 50% interest in OLTP ATM Systems, C.A., which distributes, installs and services ATMs and certain other products in Venezuela. OLTP ATM Systems, C.A. was divested in 2015.

In October 1999, Diebold Inc. acquired Procomp Amazonia Industria Eletronica, S.A., a Brazilian manufacturer and marketer of innovative technical solutions, including personal computers, servers, software, professional services and retail and banking automation equipment, for a consideration of approximately $222 million. In April 2000, Diebold Inc. acquired the financial self-service assets and related development activities of Groupe Bull based in France and Getronics N.V. based in the Netherlands, with businesses including ATMs, cash dispensers, other self-service terminals and related services primarily for the global banking industry, for a consideration of approximately $147.6 million. As part of the acquisition of Groupe Bull and Getronics N.V., Diebold Inc. further expanded its service and manufacturing capabilities in the financial industry and added approximately 1,300 employees in the areas of sales, service, management and manufacturing.

-21-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Since 2000, Diebold Inc. has made investments and acquisitions primarily in network and hardware service solutions, ATM and hardware maintenance and services, electronic voting terminals, security solutions for customers including U.S. federal government agencies, state and municipal government agencies. Notably, Diebold Inc. expanded its businesses in security and currency processing systems through the acquisition of Mosler Inc. in October 2001, and in network and hardware service solutions through the acquisition of TFE Technology Holdings, LLC in June 2004. In August 2012 Diebold Inc. acquired GAS Tecnologia for a consideration of approximately $39 million to further expand in the Brazilian internet banking, online payment and mobile banking security market.

In the third quarter of 2014, Diebold Inc. acquired Cryptera, a supplier of the encrypting PIN pad technology of Diebold Inc. and a leader in the research and development of secure payment technologies, for a consideration of approximately $13 million. On March 13, 2015, Diebold Inc. acquired all of the equity interests of Phoenix for a total purchase price of approximately $72.9 million, including approximately $12.6 million of deferred cash payments payable over the next three years. Acquiring Phoenix, a leader in developing innovative multi-vendor software solutions for ATMs and a host of other FSS (financial self-service) applications, is a foundational move to accelerate the growth of Diebold Inc. in the fast-growing managed services and branch automation spaces.

As it relates to shaping the portfolio of businesses, the announcements of Diebold Inc. subsequent to the third quarter of 2015 are consistent with its strategy of transforming into a world-class services-led, software-enabled company, supported by innovative hardware. On October 25, 2015, Diebold Inc. announced a definitive asset purchase agreement to divest its North America-based electronic security business for an aggregate purchase price of approximately $350 million in cash. Based on the successful transition of certain customer relationships, 10% of the purchase price is contingent and payable over a twelve-month period after closing. Diebold Inc. has also agreed to provide certain transition services for a $6.0 million credit. The sale was completed on February 1, 2016. Additionally, Diebold Inc. is narrowing its scope in the Brazil-Other business to primarily focus on lottery and elections to help rationalize its solution set in that market. These decisions enable Diebold Inc. to refocus its resources and better position itself to pursue growth opportunities in the dynamic self-service industry.

-22-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Today, the Diebold Group has become a leading provider of exceptional self-service innovation, security and services to financial, retail, commercial and other markets.

2.3 Legal form, registered office, fiscal year and corporate purpose

Diebold Inc. is a stock corporation under the laws of the U.S. state of Ohio, United States of America, with its registered office in North Canton, Ohio, United States of America, and the holding company of a group consisting of Diebold Inc. and affiliated companies in terms of Section 15 et seq. of the Stock Corporation Act, which is active within the areas of financial self-service and security solutions. Its entity number registered with the Ohio Secretary of State is 1276. The fiscal year of Diebold Inc. ends on December 31, of each calendar year.

The business purpose of Diebold Inc. is to carry on a general manufacturing business, including, but not limited to, the manufacture, sale, erection, disposal of and dealing in and with all kinds of safes, locks, vaults, office equipment and systems, burglar-resistant, fire-resistant and protective materials, equipment and devices, structural materials, metal houses and all manner of steel and other metal products; to carry on any of said kinds of business, or any other, either as a manufacturer or as a wholesale or retail dealer; to acquire, by purchase, lease or in any other manner, and to construct, equip, maintain, use and operate stores, storehouses, offices, shops, factories or other works or places of business, or any property, real or personal, necessary or convenient for any purpose or business of Diebold Inc., and freely to dispose of any thereof in any lawful manner; to apply for, acquire, register, adopt, own, hold, control and operate under, and to sell, grant or assign, or grant, lease or assign licenses or rights under, any patents, patent rights, licenses, shop rights, trademarks, trade names, copyrights, formulas, or any other rights of like nature, in connection with or for the purposes of any business of Diebold Inc.; to acquire, hold and freely dispose of, or otherwise use or deal with, shares or securities of other corporations; to make payment for any property, real or personal, or any estates or interests, therein, acquired in any manner, either with cash or with shares, bonds, or other securities of Diebold Inc., or with other property, or with any or all thereof; to render financial assistance to any other corporation in which Diebold Inc. is interested, or which is interested in Diebold Inc., and in connection therewith, to any extent not expressly

-23-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

prohibited by law, to guarantee or become surety or indemnitor for or of the performance or payment of any obligation or undertaking or the discharge of any liability of any such affiliated corporation; to act as agent, factor, jobber or broker for the manufacture or sale of any goods, merchandise or products of any kind whatsoever, of others; and generally to do any and all things, properly incident to or convenient for or in connection with any of the businesses, purposes or activities hereinabove enumerated or any other business in which Diebold Inc. may engage. However, neither the foregoing enumeration of purposes and powers, nor any other enumeration of powers elsewhere in the articles of incorporation contained, shall be deemed exclusive, nor a limitation of these powers which may be possessed or exercised by Diebold Inc., nor shall any of the particular purposes or powers be deemed to limit, restrain, restrict or exclude any other purposes or powers, which Diebold Inc. might otherwise have, possess or exercise; but Diebold Inc. shall have and possess, and may exercise, all powers that a corporation may lawfully have, possess and exercise under the laws of the State of Ohio, and, to the extent authorized or permitted by said laws, shall have and possess, and may exercise, all capacity and powers possessed by natural persons to carry on business and perform all acts, within or without the State of Ohio.

2.4 Share Capital, shareholders and trading on the stock exchange

2.4.1 Share Capital

As of the date of signing of this Report, Diebold Inc. had issued a total of 89,907,516 common shares each with a par value of $1.25 (Diebold-Aktien, “Diebold Shares”).

2.4.2 Authorized Shares

As of the date of signing of this Report, Diebold Inc. is authorized to issue up to 125,000,000 common shares each with a par value of $1.25 (the “Authorized Shares”) (Genehmigte Gesamtaktienanzahl) of which a total of 89,907,516 common shares have been issued.

The Ohio Revised Code provides that the authorized number of shares of an Ohio corporation must be set forth in the articles of incorporation. Under the amended and restated articles of incorporation (Satzung) of Diebold Inc. (as amended and restated, the “Articles of Incorporation”), Diebold Inc. was authorized to issue 26,000,000 shares consisting of 1,000,000 serial preferred shares without par value and 25,000,000 common shares each with a par value of $1.25. A meeting of the shareholders of Diebold Inc. held on April 3, 1996 resolved to amend the Articles of Incorporation to increase the authorized number of common shares from 25,000,000 to 125,000,000, holding the par value at $1.25 each.

-24-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Under the Ohio Revised Code, except as otherwise provided by law, the Articles of Incorporation or the Code of Regulations of a corporation, the directors of a corporation may determine the time when, the terms under which, and the considerations for which the corporation issues, disposes of or receives subscriptions for, its shares, including treasury shares. Under the amended and restated Code of Regulations of Diebold Inc. (as amended and restated, the “Code of Regulations”), the board of directors has the authority to make such rules and regulations as it deems expedient concerning the issuance, transfer and registration of certificates for shares and the shares represented thereby and may at any time, by resolution, provide for the opening of transfer books for the making and registration of transfers of shares of Diebold Inc. in any state of the United States or in any foreign country, and may employ, appoint and remove, at its discretion, any agent or agents to keep the records of its shares, to transfer or to register shares, or to perform all of said functions, at any place that the board of directors may deem advisable.

However, NYSE Rule 312.03(c) requires shareholder approval prior to the issuance of common stock, or securities convertible into or exercisable for common stock, if (i) the common stock has, or will have upon issuance, voting power equal to or in excess of 20% of the voting power outstanding before the issuance of such stock; or (ii) the number of shares of common stock to be issued is, or will be upon issuance, equal to or in excess of 20% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding before the transaction.

2.4.3 Treasury Shares

As of the date of signing of this Report 75,132,439 of the common shares were outstanding. The remaining 14,775,077 common shares were held by Diebold Inc. as treasury shares.

2.4.4 Shareholders

The following shareholders owned more than 5% of the Diebold common stock outstanding (without accounting for Diebold’s treasury shares) according to their most recent filings submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”):

-25-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Title of Class	Name of Beneficial Owner	Amount and Nature of Beneficial Ownership		Percent of Class
Common Shares	GAMCO Investors, Inc., et al. One Corporate Center Rye, New York 10580, USA		5,690,451		8.73	%
Common Shares	The Vanguard Group 100 Vanguard Boulevard Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355, USA		5,124,145		7.86	%
Common Shares	BlackRock, Inc. 55 East 52nd Street New York, NY 10022, USA		5,013,397		7.69	%

2.4.5 Trading on the stock exchange

The Diebold Shares are listed on the New York Stock Exchange under ISIN US2536511031 and with the ticker symbol DBD. As of August 10, 2016 the market capitalization amounted to about $1.8 billion. In addition, the shares are admitted to trading in the sub-segment of the regulated market of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange with additional post-admission obligations (Prime Standard) (ISIN US2536511031 / WKN 856 244).

2.5 Corporate bodies of Diebold Inc.

2.5.1 The Board of Directors of Diebold Inc.

Diebold Inc. has a single-tier governing system. Its primary governing body, the board of directors, sets the policies of Diebold Inc. and directs its activities in accordance with the Articles of Incorporation of Diebold Inc., its Code of Regulations, the Ohio Revised Code, and other applicable laws and regulations. The board of directors has delegated certain of its authorities to committees, including the Audit Committee of Diebold Inc., the Board Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee, the Finance Committee, and the Technology Strategy and Innovation Committee. The directors of Diebold Inc. are elected by the shareholders of Diebold Inc. and hold office for a term of one year from the date of the annual meeting of shareholders or until election or qualification of a successor. The Code of Regulations of Diebold Inc. requires that the board of directors be composed of not more than ten persons and not less than five persons.

The board of directors of Diebold Inc. consists of the following 10 members:

• Patrick W. Allender, Chair of Audit Committee

• Phillip R. Cox, Chair of Compensation Committee

• Richard L. Crandall, Chair of Technology Strategy and Innovation Committee

-26-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

• Gale S. Fitzgerald, Chair of Board Governance Committee

• Gary G. Greenfield, Non-Management Director

• Andreas W. Mattes, Management Director

• Robert S. Prather, Jr., Non-Management Director

• Rajesh K. Soin, Non-Management Director

• Henry D.G. Wallace, Non-executive Chairman of the Board

• Alan J. Weber, Chair of Finance Committee

Effective August 16, 2016, Diebold Inc. expands the size of its board of directors to 12 members and appoints the chairman of the supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG, Dr. Alexander Dibelius, and the member of the supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG, Dr. Dieter Düsedau, as members of the board of directors. Following the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG on September 26, 2016, Diebold Inc. plans to expand the size of its board of directors to 13 members and to appoint the current chairman of the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG, Eckard Heidloff, as a member of the board of directors, as soon as legally and practically possible.

2.5.2 The Executive Committee of Diebold Inc.

The board of directors of Diebold Inc. elects the executive officers of Diebold Inc. The term of office of the executive officers is one year or until their respective successors are elected and qualified, except if any such officer is elected to fill a vacancy. In this case, the respective officer will serve until the first meeting of the board of directors after the next annual meeting of shareholders. According to Article V of the Code of Regulations of Diebold Inc., the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) has responsibility for the general and active management of the business of Diebold Inc. and the general powers and duties of management usually vested in the chief executive officer of an Ohio corporation. The CEO may employ and discharge employees and agents, except for those that must be appointed by the board of directors, and may delegate these powers.

-27-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

As of the date of signing of this Report, the executive committee of Diebold consists of the following six members:

• Andreas W. Mattes, President and Chief Executive Officer

• Christopher A. Chapman, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

• Stefan E. Merz, Senior Vice President Strategic Projects

• Jonathan B. Leiken, Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

• John D. Kristoff, Vice President, Chief Communications Officer

• Sheila M. Rutt, Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer

On August 15, 2016, the current members of Wincor Nixdorf AG’s management board, Eckard Heidloff, Dr. Jürgen Wunram, Olaf Heyden and Dr. Ulrich Näher, have been appointed as members of a new management panel at Diebold Inc. in accordance with the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, the so-called Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is being staffed with representatives of Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. on the basis of parity and expected to hold a constituent meeting after the extraordinary general meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled to resolve upon the approval of the agreement on September 26, 2016.

2.6 Structure of the Diebold Group

2.6.1 Operative and legal structure

Diebold Inc. is the holding company of the Diebold Group. As of December 31, 2016, Diebold Inc. held about 100 direct and indirect participations.

The operations of the Diebold Group sell and service FSS (financial self-services) and security systems around the globe, as well as elections, lottery and information technology solutions in Brazil, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, joint ventures and independent distributors in most major countries.

2.6.2 Significant subsidiaries; consolidated companies

Diebold Inc. fully consolidated a total of 97 participations in the United States and other countries, excluding Wincor Nixdorf AG and its subsidiaries, in its consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2015. Aside from this, reference is made to the list of shareholdings of Diebold Inc. as of December 31, 2015 which is attached to this Report as Annex 2.

-28-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

2.7 Business activities of the Diebold Group

The Diebold Group has two core lines of business: financial self-service and security solutions, which Diebold Group integrates based on its customers’ needs.

2.7.1 Financial self-service

The business of self-service solution for financial services relates, in particular, to automated teller machines (Geldautomaten, “ATM”). The Diebold Group offers an integrated line of self-service technologies and services, including comprehensive ATM outsourcing, ATM security, deposit automation, recycling and payment terminals and software. The Diebold Group also offers advanced functionality terminals such as two-way video technology to support bank branch automation. The Diebold Group is a global supplier of ATMs and related services and holds leading market positions in many countries around the world.

2.7.2 Security solutions

From the safes and vaults that Diebold Inc. first manufactured in 1859 to the full range of physical and electronic security offerings it provides today, the security solutions of Diebold Inc. utilize an extensive services portfolio and advanced products to help address its customers’ unique needs. The Diebold Group provides its customers with the latest technological advances to better protect their assets, improve their workflow and increase their return on investment. These solutions are backed with experienced sales, installation and service teams. The Diebold Group is a leader in providing physical and electronic security systems as well as assisted transactions, providing total security systems solutions to financial, commercial, retail, and other markets.

2.7.3 Geographic distribution

The operations of the Diebold Group are comprised of four geographic segments: North America (NA), Asia Pacific (AP), Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) as well as Latin America (LA). The four geographic segments sell and service FSS (financial self-services) and security systems around the globe, as well as elections, lottery and information technology solutions in Brazil-Other, through wholly-owned subsidiaries, majority-owned joint ventures and independent distributors in most major countries.

-29-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

2.8 Development of the business and earnings situation of the Diebold Group

The following selected consolidated financial information for the fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015 and for the balance sheet dates of December 31, 2013, 2014 and 2015 have been taken or derived from the audited consolidated financial statements of Diebold Inc. for 2015, unless otherwise stated. The selected financial data as of June 30 2016 and for the period between January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016 are taken or derived from the unaudited interim financial statement of Diebold Inc.

2.8.1 Financial information for the fiscal years 2013, 2014 and 2015

The annual sales (U.S. GAAP) of the Diebold Group for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015 amounted to approximately $2.4 billion, with an operating profit of approximately $58.6 million and income from continuing operations before taxes of approximately $45.8 million.

Selected data from the consolidated profit-and-loss statement

	Fiscal year ended December 31
	2015			2014			2013
	(in millions, except per share data)
Results of operations
Net sales	$	2,419.3		$	2,734.8		$	2,582.7
Cost of sales	$	(1,767.3	)	$	(2,008.6	)	$	(1,996.7	)
Gross profit	$	652.0		$	726.2		$	586.0
Net profit (loss) on operating activities	$	58.6		$	165.0		$	(140.3	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes	$	45.8		$	154.7		$	(141.8	)
Amounts attributable to Diebold Inc.
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	$	57.8		$	104.7		$	(195.3	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	15.9		$	9.7		$	13.7
Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold Inc.	$	73.7		$	114.4		$	(181.6	)
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	$	0.89		$	1.62		$	(3.06	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	0.24		$	0.15		$	0.21
Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold Inc.	$	1.13		$	1.77		$	(2.85	)

-30-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

	Fiscal year ended December 31
	2015		2014		2013
	(in millions, except per share data)
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	$	0.88	$	1.61	$	(3.06	)
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	0.24	$	0.15	$	0.21
Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold Inc.	$	1.12	$	1.76	$	(2.85	)
Number of weighted-average shares outstanding
Basic shares		64.9		64.5		63.7
Diluted shares		65.6		65.2		63.7
Dividends
Common dividends paid	$	75.6	$	74.9	$	74.0
Common dividends paid per share	$	1.15	$	1.15	$	1.15

Selected balance sheet data

	As of December 31
	2015		2014		2013
	(in millions)
Consolidated balance sheet data (as of period end)
Current assets	$	1,643.6	$	1,655.5	$	1,555.4
Current liabilities	$	955.8	$	1,027.8	$	893.8
Net working capital	$	687.8	$	627.7	$	661.6
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	175.3	$	165.7	$	160.9
Long-term debt	$	613.1	$	479.8	$	480.2	(1)
Total long-term liabilities	$	858.0	$	759.5	$	668.9
Total assets	$	2,249.3	$	2,342.1	$	2,183.5
Total equity	$	435.5	$	554.8	$	620.8

(1) Derived from the consolidated financial statements for the year 2014

2.8.2 Financial information as of June 30, 2016 and for the period from January 1, 2016 to June 30, 2016

Pursuant to the unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive (loss) income of Diebold Inc. for the period from January 1, 2016 until June 30, 2016, as prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP, net sales revenue amounted to approximately $1,089.6 million, the loss from continuing operations before taxes to $15.8 million and the net income attributable to Diebold Inc. to $147.1 million. On February 1, 2016, Diebold Inc. completed the divestiture of its North America electronic business to Securitas AB. As a result, North America electronic security financial results and the gain of sale are reported as discontinued operations.

-31-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Selected data of the consolidated profit-and-loss statement

	Six-month period ended June 30
	2016			2015
	(in millions, except share data)
Results of operations
Net sales	$	1,089.6		$	1,219.3
Cost of sales	$	(795.7	)	$	(889.3	)
Gross profit	$	293.9		$	330.0
Operating profit	$	4.6		$	21.0
Income (loss) from continuing operations before taxes	$	(15.8	)	$	(9.3	)
Amounts attributable to Diebold Inc
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	$	(1.2	)	$	10.7
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax.	$	148.3		$	8.7
Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold Inc.	$	147.1		$	19.4
Basic earnings (loss) per common share
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	$	(0.02	)	$	0.17
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	2.28		$	0.13
Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold Inc.	$	2.26		$	0.30
Diluted earnings (loss) per common share
Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of tax	$	(0.02	)	$	0.17
(Loss) income from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	2.26		$	0.13
Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold Inc.	$	2.24		$	0.30
Number of weighted-average shares outstanding
Basic shares		65.1			64.8
Diluted shares		65.7			65.5
Dividends
Common dividends paid	$	38.0		$	37.8
Common dividends paid per share	$	0.575		$	0.575

-32-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Selected balance sheet data

	As of June 30, 2016		As of December 31, 2015
	(in millions)
Consolidated balance sheet data (as of period end)
Current assets	$	3,458.2	$	1,643.6
Current liabilities	$	918.0	$	955.8
Net working capital(1)	$	2,540.2	$	687.8
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	166.1	$	175.3
Long-term debt	$	2,274.0	$	606.2
Total long-term liabilities(2)	$	2,520.5	$	851.1
Total assets	$	4,040.5	$	2,242.4
Total equity	$	602.0	$	435.5

(1) Calculated from the difference between current assets and current liabilities.

(2) Calculated from the difference between the total assets and the sum of current liabilities and total equity.

2.8.3 Development of the business and earnings situation for the first half of 2016

Since entering into the “Walk” phase of Diebold 2.0, Diebold Inc. lays greater emphasis on the increase of the mix of revenue from services and software. As it relates to increasing the mix of revenue from services and software, Diebold Inc. has sharpened its focus on pursuing and winning managed services and multi-vendor service contracts. Through the second quarter of 2016, Diebold Inc. had approximately 28,000 ATMs under managed service agreement and approximately 12,000 ATMs under a service contract in North America. For the software business, the acquisition of Phoenix has significantly enhanced Diebold Inc.’s ability to capture more of the market for ATM, multi-vendor, marketing and asset management software.

As it relates to shaping the portfolio of businesses, Diebold Inc. has made progress in the first half of 2016 towards completing the business combination with the Wincor Nixdorf Group. During the first half of 2016, Diebold Inc. successfully surpassed the minimum threshold for tendered ordinary shares of Wincor Nixdorf AG and completed the required financing for the acquisition, paving the way for the closing of the Takeover Offer which took place on August 15, 2016. Additionally, Diebold Inc. completed the sale of its North America electronic security business in the first quarter of 2016.

FSS (financial self-services) sales in the six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased $123.3 million or 11.6 percent compared to the same period of 2015, including net unfavorable currency impact of $44.9 million or 3.9 percent. The unfavorable currency impacts in the six months ended June 30, 2016 were related mainly to the Brazil real as well as smaller impacts from the South Africa rand, Turkish lira, India rupee, China renminbi and Canada dollar.

-33-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Security sales in the six months ended June 30, 2016 decreased $12.1 million or 8.4 percent compared to the same period in 2015 and was impacted by $1.9 million of unfavorable currency. In addition to the currency impact, North America physical security business decreased due to overall volume declines more heavily weighted in the national bank space when compared to the prior year. The electronic security business declined in the six months ended June 30, 2016 primarily in Latin America attributable to lower sales in Chile and Ecuador, which was partially offset by the transition services revenue in North America as a sub-contractor to Securitas.

The change in operating profit for the six months ended June 30, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 was driven by a decline in product gross profit associated with volume declines and country revenue mix in all of the regions as well as the deteriorating market conditions in China, while service gross profit remained relatively flat. Additionally, a decline in operating expense helped to partially offset the decrease in gross profit primarily due to lower selling and research and development expense offset by higher non-routine charges.

(i) Results of operations

	Six-month period ended June 30
	2016			2015			Change
	(in millions)
Net sales	$	1,089.6		$	1,219.3			(10.6	%)
Cost of sales	$	(795.7	)	$	(889.3	)		(10.5	%)
Gross profit	$	293.9		$	330.0			(10.9	%)
Operating profit (loss)	$	4.6		$	21.0			(78.1	%)
Income (loss) from continuing operations before tax	$	(15.8	)	$	9.3			(269.9	%)
Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold Inc.	$	147.1		$	19.4			658.2	%

-34-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(ii) Financial situation

Assets (significant items)

	As of June 30, 2016		As of December 31, 2015
	(in millions)
Goodwill	$	169.2	$	161.5
Securities and other investments	$	84.0	$	85.2
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	166.1	$	175.3
Finance lease receivables	$	22.7	$	36.5
Balance sheet total	$	4,040.5	$	2,242.4

Liabilities (significant items)

	As of June 30, 2016		As of December 31, 2015
	(in millions)
Equity	$	602.0	$	435.5
Current liabilities	$	918.0	$	955.8
Long-term debt	$	2,274.0	$	606.2
Balance sheet total	$	4,040.5	$	2,242.4

2.9 Employees

As of June 30 2016, the Diebold Group employed approximately 15,000 employees globally. The service staff of the Diebold Group is one of the financial industry’s largest, with professionals in more than 600 locations and businesses in more than 90 countries worldwide.

2.10 Takeover Offer and further acquisitions of the Diebold Group

2.10.1 Takeover Offer and further acquisition of shares

On February 5, 2016, Diebold Inc. published a voluntary public takeover offer to all Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders for the acquisition of their bearer shares without par value of Wincor Nixdorf AG for an offer consideration consisting of a payment of €38.98 (cash component) and 0.434 Diebold offer shares (share component) per Wincor Nixdorf Share. The Takeover Offer was subject to – inter alia – the closing condition that a minimum acceptance rate of 22,362,159 Wincor Nixdorf Shares (this corresponds to about 67.6% of all Wincor Nixdorf Shares existing as of the date of the approval of publishing the offer document by the Federal Financial Supervisory Authority (BaFin)) is achieved.

The management board and supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG in principle recommended the acceptance of the Offer in their reasoned statement published on February 11, 2015.

-35-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The acceptance period (Section 16 para. 1 of the German Takeover Act (WpÜG)) expired on March 22, 2016, 24:00 hours. Until its expiration, the Takeover Offer had been accepted for 22,544,692 Wincor Nixdorf Shares in total, hence 68.1% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG. In addition, 262,279 voting rights of shares were attributed to Diebold KGaA pursuant to Section 30 of the German Takeover Act (WpÜG) at the end of the acceptance period, which were counted when calculating the acceptance level. In total, an acceptance level of about 68.9% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG (including the Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares) was reached.

The additional acceptance period (Section 16 para. 2 sentence 1 of the German Takeover Act (WpÜG)) commenced on March 30, 2016 and expired on April 12, 2016 at 24:00 hours. Until expiration of the additional acceptance period, the Takeover Offer had been accepted for 22,876,760 Wincor Nixdorf Shares in total, which corresponds to 69.1% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG. Together with the 241,324 voting rights attributed pursuant to Section 30 of the German Takeover Act (WpÜG) at the end of the additional acceptance period, an acceptance level of about 69.9% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG (including the Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares) was reached.

In the course of settlement of the Takeover Offer, the tendered Wincor Nixdorf Shares were, in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Takeover Offer, transferred directly into the securities deposit account of Diebold KGaA without any prior acquisition or temporary purchase (Vor- oder Durchgangserwerb) by Diebold Inc. As of the date of signing of this Report, Diebold Inc. holds an indirect participation in Wincor Nixdorf AG of 69.1% of the current share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG, which is divided into 33,084,988 shares, or 22,876,760 Wincor Nixdorf Shares, of which 69,1% or 22,876,760 Wincor Nixdorf Shares are directly held by Diebold KGaA. This corresponds to a proportion of 76.7% of the voting rights of Wincor Nixdorf AG (excluding Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares, which carry no voting rights pursuant to Section 71b of the Stock Corporation Act).

2.10.2 Possible purchases outside the Exit Compensation Offer

Diebold Inc., and Diebold KGaA, reserve the right to purchase additional Wincor Nixdorf Shares outside of the offer for Exit Compensation (as defined herein, see Section IV.1.5 below) at any time, directly or indirectly, on or off a stock exchange. Additional purchases, if any, will comply with applicable laws and regulations, including, to the extent applicable, from the time of announcement of the offer for Exit Compensation until its expiration, the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations promulgated by

-36-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

the SEC thereunder. If such additional purchases take place or agreements awarding a claim to the transfer of Wincor Nixdorf Shares are entered into prior to March 30, 2017, this will be published by Diebold Inc. without undue delay in accordance with applicable law, including Sections 14 para. 3, 23 para. 2 of the German Takeover Act (WpÜG), on the website of Diebold Inc. at http://www.dieboldnixdorf.com under Company/Investor Relations, in the German Federal Gazette (Bundesanzeiger) and by way of an English language press release via an electronically operated information distribution system in the United States, stating the number of shares and/or voting rights so acquired or agreed to acquire, and the nature and amount of consideration paid or agreed to be paid for each share and/or voting right. The obligation to publically disclose information regarding additional purchases pursuant to sections 14 para. 3, 23 para. 2 of the German Takeover Act (WpÜG) exists only for purchases or acquisition agreements respectively which will have taken place or will be closed until March 29, 2017, 12:00 pm (Central European Summer Time).

3. Diebold KGaA

3.1 Overview

Diebold KGaA is a subsidiary of Diebold Inc. The registered share capital of Diebold KGaA is €50,000.00 and is divided into 50,000 ordinary registered shares without par value (Stammaktien).

3.2 Legal form, registered office, fiscal year and corporate purpose

Diebold KGaA is a partnership limited by shares (Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien), having its registered seat in Eschborn, Germany, registered in the commercial register (Handelsregister) of the local court (Amtsgericht) of Frankfurt am Main under HRB 104287. The fiscal year of Diebold KGaA begins on October 1 of each calendar year and ends on September 30, of the respective following calendar year.

The object of the company is (i) the acquisition, ownership, disposal and administration of direct and indirect interests in other companies or enterprises, including, but not limited to, acting as a management holding company or operational holding company by way of direct or indirect corporate governance, management and administration of such companies and enterprises, in particular, by way of rendering administrative, financial, commercial and technical services for the respective affiliates against consideration, as well as (ii) the acquisition, ownership and disposal of debt receivables and other financial assets.

-37-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The company may engage in all business activities which serve, directly or indirectly, the object of the company. Diebold KGaA is, in particular, allowed to invest in, acquire interests in and dispose of other companies and to establish domestic and foreign branch offices and subsidiaries. The company may furthermore enter into agreements with its affiliates and third parties against consideration in the context of acting as management holding company or operational holding company by way of direct or indirect corporate governance, management and administration of its affiliates.

3.3 Limited partner’s capital contribution and general partner

Diebold Inc. is the sole limited shareholder (Kommanditaktionär) of Diebold KGaA and holds all 50,000 ordinary registered shares without par value. Diebold Inc. as the operating holding company of the globally active Diebold Group is also the sole general partner of Diebold KGaA. Diebold Inc. and Diebold KGaA are companies within the meaning of Section 291 para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act.

3.4 Corporate bodies and representation

3.4.1 Management

Pursuant to Article 6 para. 1 sentence 1 of the articles of association of Diebold KGaA (Diebold KGaA-Satzung, “Diebold KGaA Articles of Association”), Diebold KGaA shall be represented by the general partner, Diebold Inc., who, pursuant to Article 6 para. 2 sentence 1 of the Diebold KGaA Articles of Association, shall also be responsible for the management of Diebold KGaA. At the time of signing of this Report, the following individuals are members of the management of Diebold Inc.:

• Andreas W. Mattes, President and Chief Executive Officer

• Christopher A. Chapman, Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

• Stefan E. Merz, Senior Vice President, Strategic Projects

• Jonathan B. Leiken, Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary

• John D. Kristoff, Vice President, Chief Communications Officer

• Sheila M. Rutt, Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer

-38-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

On August 15, 2016, the current members of Wincor Nixdorf AG’s management board, Eckard Heidloff, Dr. Jürgen Wunram, Olaf Heyden and Dr. Ulrich Näher, have been appointed as members of a new management panel at Diebold Inc. in accordance with the terms of the Business Combination Agreement, the so-called Executive Committee. The Executive Committee is being staffed with representatives of Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. on the basis of parity and expected to hold a constituent meeting after the extraordinary general meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled to resolve upon the approval of the agreement on September 26, 2016.

3.4.2 Supervisory board

Pursuant to Sections 278 para. 3, 96 para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act and Section 7 para. 1 of the Diebold KGaA Articles of Association, the supervisory board of Diebold KGaA consists of three members. At the time of signing of this Report, the supervisory board of Diebold KGaA consists of the following members:

• Stefan Merz

• Jonathan B. Leiken

• David S. Kuhl

3.5 Business activities and participations

The business activity of Diebold KGaA is the management of its own assets. Diebold KGaA holds a share of 69.1% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG. This corresponds to a proportion of 76.7% of the voting rights of Wincor Nixdorf AG (excluding Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares, which carry no voting rights pursuant to Section 71b of the Stock Corporation Act). At the time of signing of this Report, Diebold KGaA also holds all shares in Diebold Finance Germany GmbH, with its registered seat in Eschborn, registered with the commercial register (Handelsregister) of the local court (Amtsgericht) of Frankfurt am Main under HRB 105504.

3.6 Earnings situation and financial position of Diebold KGaA as of December 31, 2015

As of December 31, 2015, the share capital of Diebold KGaA amounted to €50,000 contributed in cash. Thus, the credits in bank accounts amounted to

-39-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

€50,000 and the subscribed capital also amounted to €50,000. There were no accounts payable at that point in time. Since settlement of the Takeover Offer Diebold KGaA holds a share of 69.1% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG. Until Settlement of the Takeover Offer, Diebold KGaA did not engage in operative business activities other than preparing the acquisition of the shares of Wincor Nixdorf AG and related auxiliary transactions.

With regard to the financial funding of Diebold KGaA, reference is made to Section II.3.8 and the guarantee of Diebold Inc. which is attached together with the Agreement as Annex 3.

After the Agreement becomes effective, Diebold KGaA will primarily generate revenues and earnings from the transfer of profits of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

3.7 Employees and employee representation

Diebold KGaA does not have any employees. Employee representations do not exist.

3.8 Financial funding of Diebold KGaA for fulfilment of its obligations under the Agreement

Prior to signing of this Report, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA examined whether Diebold KGaA would be able to fulfil its payment obligations under the Agreement. Based on the economic, financial and contractual situation at Diebold KGaA, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA have concluded that Diebold KGaA will be able to fulfil its obligations resulting under the Agreement.

The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA have based this conclusion on the following aspects:

For the future payment obligations of Diebold KGaA after the obligation to transfer profit under the Agreement takes effect (see on this point, Section IV.1.2), the profit of Wincor Nixdorf AG will be available, whereas Diebold KGaA will be required under Section 302 of the Stock Corporation Act to compensate for any annual loss of Wincor Nixdorf AG arising during the term of the contract. There are no indications of any threatening loss situation at Wincor Nixdorf AG in its current fiscal year. The Wincor Nixdorf Group generated a net income of €7.8 million in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015. During the period from October 1, 2015, to June 30, 2016, the Wincor Nixdorf Group generated a net income of roughly €89 million. The free cash flow amounted to about €49 million.

-40-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Furthermore, besides Diebold KGaA, Diebold Inc., as the general partner of Diebold KGaA, is liable without limitation for the liabilities of Diebold KGaA (Section 278 paras. 1 and 2 of the Stock Corporation Act in conjunction with Sections 161 para. 2, 128 et seq. of the German Commercial Code). This liability refers to all of the liabilities of Diebold KGaA and is not limited to a certain amount or to certain assets. The liability of Diebold Inc. is linked to the creditor’s claim against Diebold KGaA, in particular, the liability of Diebold Inc. for a liability of Diebold KGaA expires upon expiration of the corresponding liability of Diebold KGaA. However, creditors of Diebold KGaA are not obliged to claim Diebold KGaA first but may directly demand performance from Diebold Inc.

In addition, without joining the Agreement as a contracting party, Diebold Inc. has issued a separate guarantee to Wincor Nixdorf AG which is attached to this Report together with the Agreement as Annex 3.

Diebold Inc. undertakes in the guarantee to ensure that Diebold KGaA is financed in such a manner that Diebold KGaA will always be able to fulfil all its liabilities under or in connection with the Agreement completely and in a timely manner. This applies in particular to the obligation to assume losses according to Section 302 of the Stock Corporation Act. In addition, Diebold Inc. guarantees, without limitation and irrevocably vis-à-vis the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG, in case Diebold KGaA is not able to fulfil all its liabilities under or in connection with the Agreement in full and in a timely manner and Diebold Inc. does not comply with its aforesaid obligation to provide Diebold KGaA with sufficient fund as described in more detail above, that Diebold KGaA will fulfill all its obligations towards them arising from or in connection with the Agreement, in particular regarding the payment of recurring compensation payment (Ausgleichszahlung) and exit compensation (Abfindung) completely and in time. To this extent, outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG have an own right according to Section 328 para. 1 of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB) to demand payment to Diebold KGaA (see Section IV.1.8). As the obligations of Diebold Inc. under the guarantee exist independently whether or not Diebold Inc. remains personally liable partner in Diebold KGaA, an exchange of the personally liable partner would not have a considerable impact to the ability of Diebold KGaA to comply with its duties under the guarantee. Furthermore, Diebold Inc. is liable as personally liable partner of Diebold

-41-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

KGaA even after its resignation as further stipulated under section 278 para. 2 German Stock Corporation Act (AktG) in conjunction with section 161 para. 2, section 160 German Commercial Code (HGB) for a period of five years, provided the liability was created at the time of its resignation. Hence, Diebold Inc. remains liable during this time period for claims of Wincor Nixdorf AG under the agreement, which were created at the time of the resignation of Diebold Inc. as general partner of Diebold KGaA. Eventually, for the subsequent period, Wincor Nixdorf AG and the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG are entitled under the guarantee.

III. REASONS FOR ENTERING INTO THE DOMINATION AND PROFIT-AND-LOSS TRANSFER AGREEMENT

1. Economic and legal reasons

1.1 Aiming to create a joint company

The Agreement is essential to create a joint company (Kombinierte Gruppe, “Combined Group”) as it will enable closer cooperation between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. The instruction right under the Agreement will allow the executive management of the Diebold Group to prevail vis-á-vis Wincor Nixdorf AG by establishing a consistent control in the interest of the group, as well as to apply or, respectively, implement consistent organizational structures and strategies. This, in turn, is a key requirement for the planned collaboration between Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG.

Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG believe that the business combination will provide significant strategic opportunities. Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG have the expectation that the business combination would complement their strategic transformation and expansion into a leading, services-led and software-enabled company supported by innovative hardware and would enable the Combined Group to provide broader and fully integrated solution offerings to clients more efficiently and on a global scale. Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG also expect that the business combination would create a larger and stronger core business with the potential to be a self-service solution provider in the segments banking and retail with an installed base of approximately one million ATMs worldwide to the benefit of the customers of the Combined Group.

Together, the Diebold Group and Wincor Nixdorf Group cover the regions of the Americas, the EMEA (Europe, Middle East and Africa) and Asia. The Diebold Group is a leading player in the Americas, whereas the Wincor

-42-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Nixdorf Group is a leading player in Europe. These two regions are key drivers for innovation and digital transformation in the segments banking and retail. Diebold Inc. would benefit from the strong relationships of the Wincor Nixdorf Group with customers and suppliers in Europe, the Middle East and Asia while the strong service presence of the Combined Group will also benefit the retail business of the Wincor Nixdorf Group.

Therefore, both Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG expect that the business combination would create a geographically expanded business with opportunities for an amplified global presence, including entry into new markets. The complementary regional footprints of the Diebold Group and the Wincor Nixdorf Group and the complementary strengths in software, hardware and services would allow the Combined Group to provide customers with greater worldwide access to an integrated solution across the aforementioned product segments. Ultimately, the collective capabilities and established global market presence of the Combined Group will offer a broad range of services and software for its customer base and growth in both the software and services segments is expected to be accelerated by the business combination.

Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG are of the opinion, that, by leveraging innovative solutions and talent from both organizations, it will have the scale, strength and flexibility to better support its customers in the development of their own business. Furthermore, they anticipate significant cost efficiencies and synergy gains resulting from the business combination.

Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG believe that both companies show a common strategic focus on growing services and software, complementary offerings, a complementary geographic presence and complementary customer bases. Consequently, Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG expect the transaction to yield by the end of the third full year following the settlement of the Takeover Offer annual synergies of up to approximately $160 million, which are expected to arise, among others, through product consolidation, services rationalization in overlapping regions and better purchase conditions. In the current assessment, the Combined Group should achieve an operating margin adjusted for restructuring and non-routine items in excess of 9% by the end of the third full year post settlement. In addition, Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG expect that the transaction is accretive to earnings per share adjusted for restructuring and non-routine items in the second year.

-43-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Finally, Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG expect that the business combination will provide increased free cash flow, which may be used to pursue future key investments.

1.2 Limits and restrictions on cooperation in the current de facto corporate group

Due to the majority participation of Diebold KGaA, a de facto corporate group exists between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold KGaA at the present time. Indirectly, this also applies to the relationship between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. as Diebold Inc. is the sole general partner of Diebold KGaA and holds a participation of 100% of the shares in Diebold KGaA. In this de facto corporate group, Diebold KGaA and Diebold Inc. can exercise factual controlling influence over Wincor Nixdorf AG but the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG continues to be under an obligation to manage the company on its own responsibility in accordance with Section 76 para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act. The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG must examine in each individual case all measures or transactions taken or omitted on the initiative or in the interest of Diebold KGaA or one of its affiliated companies in the Diebold Group with regard to whether it has adverse effects for Wincor Nixdorf AG. If such transactions or measures are adverse for Wincor Nixdorf AG, they may only be implemented if the adverse effect linked to the relevant transaction or measure is compensated by Diebold KGaA. The compensation for the adverse effect must either actually occur by the end of the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which the measure has been taken or omitted, i.e. in a short period of time, or the compensation must occur by granting a corresponding legal claim (Section 311 para. 2 of the Stock Corporation Act). Due to this legal situation, all measures and transactions of Wincor Nixdorf AG taken or omitted on the initiative or in the interest of Diebold KGaA or any of its affiliated companies in the Diebold Group must be examined in each individual case with regard to their exact effects on Wincor Nixdorf AG and any harm incurred and with regard to the duty to compensate.

Furthermore, all measures and transactions in a de facto corporate group which are taken on the initiative or in the interest of the controlling company or one of its affiliates must be reported annually in the so-called control report (Abhängigkeitsbericht) by the management board of the controlled company and the adverse effects must be quantified (Section 312 of the Stock Corporation Act). The control report (Abhängigkeitsbericht) must be examined both by the supervisory board as well as by the auditor of the controlled company (Sections 313, 314 of the Stock Corporation Act).

-44-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

These principles applicable to the de facto corporate group lead to a substantial expenditure of time and resources, especially on the side of the controlled company. Both the management board as well as other departments of Wincor Nixdorf AG (e.g., the legal department, the tax department or the internal audit) must be involved in every measure and every transaction of Wincor Nixdorf AG, whether with Diebold KGaA or with a third party, taken or omitted on the initiative or in the interest of Diebold KGaA or any of its affiliated companies in the Diebold Group, in order to assure compliance with the rules applicable to a de facto corporate group. This not only ties up resources at Wincor Nixdorf AG as the controlled company, but also leads to substantial delays in the intended cooperation between the Wincor Nixdorf Group and the Diebold Group. As a result, the fast and efficient implementation of management decisions that are in the common interest is impeded.

In addition, the quantification and compensation of any adverse effect to the controlled company results in great difficulties in de facto corporate groups. Such difficulties regularly arise in the context of transactions and measures which go beyond the mere exchange of performance and consideration (e.g., purchasing goods or rendering services) or for which a market price cannot be determined. Such measures are, for example, the exchange of know-how and business information. In practice, it is difficult in these situations, if not often impossible, to quantify and compensate any adverse effects or corresponding benefits of the controlled company. The consequence is that such measures are not possible with sufficient legal certainty in a de facto corporate group and can, if at all, only be carried out with a substantial effort for the examination and documentation thereof or may have to be avoided completely.

The implementation of extensive cooperation and an intensive exchange of information, however, are necessary in order to realize the intended benefits from further cooperation in the activities of the Wincor Nixdorf Group and the Diebold Group described in Section III.1.1. Without entering into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement, these benefits can be realized within narrow limits at most.

1.3 Creation of a contractual corporate group by concluding the domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement

These difficulties existing in a de facto corporate group are avoided if a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement is concluded as this creates a contractual basis for the intended close cooperation. In a contractual

-45-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

corporate group, the provisions about specific compensation for adverse transactions and measures initiated by the controlling company or by one of its affiliated companies or taken or omitted in its interest do not apply. The controlling party to the contract especially has the right to directly issue instructions to the management board of the controlled company to take measures or engage in transactions in the interest of the controlling party to the contract or one of its affiliated companies. This is true even if such measures or transactions might be adverse for the controlled company when viewed on a stand-alone basis (Section 308 of the Stock Corporation Act), the adverse effects are not/cannot be compensated within the same fiscal year and/or an exact quantification of the adverse effect is not possible. This makes it possible to use resources more efficiently and also to implement those measures for cooperation for which the quantification of any adverse effect and any benefit associated with it is not possible with legal certainty. Measures by management can accordingly be focused towards the common interest of the affiliated companies without great effort being required to assess the impact of every measure on the controlled company. In addition, the expense for preparing and auditing the control report (Abhängigkeitsbericht) is avoided because such a report does not have to be prepared in a contractual corporate group.

The Agreement enables Diebold KGaA and Diebold Inc. to better control the intended cooperation with the Wincor Nixdorf Group in the common interest of the Combined Group. The Agreement will also facilitate the unimpeded exchange of information with regard to country specific market data, prices, calculations and customer data between Wincor Nixdorf AG and the Diebold Group.

Entering into the Agreement is the appropriate legal means to implement the intended comprehensive cooperation of the involved companies and is also used by other companies in comparable cases and is specifically intended by the law to be used for this purpose.

As a result of the combination of the domination agreement with a profit-and-loss transfer agreement, Diebold KGaA is also entitled to claim for transfer of profit against Wincor Nixdorf AG as of the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG beginning on October 1, 2016, provided that the Agreement will be registered by September 30, 2017 with the commercial register of Wincor Nixdorf AG. In exchange, under the Agreement Wincor Nixdorf AG receives a claim for assumption of losses for the period, for which the obligation to transfer profit exists, in the event that an annual loss of Wincor Nixdorf AG arises during the

-46-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

term of the contract. Contrary to the situation in a de facto corporate group, after entering into the Agreement, Wincor Nixdorf AG is no longer forced to rely on individual compensation for a potentially adverse impact suffered as a result of the exercise of influence and instead acquires by force of law a claim for full assumption of losses from Diebold KGaA regardless of the exercise of influence or other factors (see Section 302 of the Stock Corporation Act).

The interests of Wincor Nixdorf AG are also protected after entering into the Agreement by the fact that the right to issue instructions does not exist without limitation (on this point see also, Section IV.1.1 below). In particular, Wincor Nixdorf AG may not be deprived of the viability as a result of adverse instructions because the statutory provisions are based on the assumption of a continuing existence of the controlled company even for the time after any termination of the Agreement. Adverse instructions are also impermissible and do not trigger any duty to comply with them if they obviously do not serve the interests of the controlling company or any companies affiliated with the controlling company or the controlled company.

The Agreement establishes special protective mechanisms for outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders which are not available in a de facto corporate group: they receive a claim against Diebold KGaA for the duration of the Agreement for an adequate recurring compensation payment (see Section IV.1.4 for further detail), or they can transfer their shares to Diebold KGaA and cease to be shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG in exchange for payment of adequate exit compensation if they want to dispose of their Wincor Nixdorf Shares in light of the Agreement (see on this point the explanations in Section IV.1.5).

Additional security results from the fact that Diebold Inc., as the personally liable general partner of Diebold KGaA, is personally liable for its liabilities without limitation (Section 278 paras. 1 and 2 of the Stock Corporation Act in conjunction with Sections 161 para. 2, 128 et seq. of the German Commercial Code). This liability refers to all of the liabilities of Diebold KGaA and is not limited to a certain amount or to certain assets. Creditors of Diebold KGaA are not obliged to set up their claims against Diebold KGaA first, but may directly demand performance from Diebold Inc.

Furthermore, Diebold Inc. has issued a guarantee in favor of Wincor Nixdorf AG, according to which Diebold Inc., under certain conditions, is responsible for Diebold KGaA to meet its obligations resulting from or in connection with the Agreement, especially the payment of the Recurring Compensation Payment and the Exit Compensation (all of them as defined in Section IV.1.4 and IV.1.5) (see Section IV.1.8).

-47-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

2. Tax reasons

Entering into a profit-and-loss transfer agreement within the meaning of Section 291 of the Stock Corporation Act enables the establishment of a consolidated tax group for purposes of corporate income tax (Körperschaftsteuer) and trade tax (Gewerbesteuer) (consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax (ertragsteuerliche Organschaft)) between Diebold KGaA as the parent company (Organträger) and Wincor Nixdorf AG as the subordinate company (Organgesellschaft).

The existence of a consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax furthermore requires, inter alia, that from the beginning of its fiscal year, the parent company continuously participates in the subordinate company to such an extent that it holds a majority of the voting rights of the subordinate company (Section 14 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 1 sentence 1 of the German Corporation Tax Act (Körperschaftsteuergesetz, “Corporation Tax Act”)) and that the participation is continuously attributable to a domestic permanent establishment of the parent company of the tax group for the entire term of the consolidated tax group (Section 14 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 2 sentence 4 of the Corporation Tax Act). The validity of the consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax also requires that the profit-and-loss transfer agreement is entered into for a period of at least five full years (60 months) (Section 14 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 3 sentence 1 of the Corporation Tax Act) and is actually implemented during the entire term of its validity.

The consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax will exist starting on October 1, 2016, based on the assumption that the Agreement is registered in the commercial register at the registered seat of Wincor Nixdorf AG by September 30, 2017. If the Agreement is only registered at a subsequent point in time, the consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax will only be established as of the beginning of that fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which the registration takes place.

The consolidation does not eliminate the general tax obligations of Wincor Nixdorf AG. Wincor Nixdorf AG must determine its taxable profit under the general provisions separately from Diebold KGaA as in the past. For purposes of corporate income tax, the income of Wincor Nixdorf AG will be determined separately and uniformly and with binding effect for Diebold KGaA and

-48-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Wincor Nixdorf AG. As a consequence of the creation of the consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax, however, the taxable income of Wincor Nixdorf AG – taking into account certain restrictions in the law – will be attributed to Diebold KGaA and will be taxed at the level of Diebold KGaA starting in that fiscal year in which the tax consolidation first exists. Nevertheless, 20/17 of the recurring compensation payments to outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG are subject to corporate income tax at the level of Wincor Nixdorf AG (Section 16 of the Corporation Tax Act).

The establishment of the consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax leads to a positive liquidity effect for Diebold KGaA because transfers of profit under commercial law of Wincor Nixdorf AG to Diebold KGaA in the context of the consolidated tax group are, contrary to distributions of profit, not subject to capital gains tax (Kapitalertragsteuerabzug) plus solidarity surcharge (Solidaritätszuschlag). If no profit-and-loss transfer agreement were entered into and the profit were distributed in the form of dividends, a crediting or reimbursement of the capital gains tax plus solidarity surcharge would generally only take place in the context of the assessment of corporate income tax (Körperschaftsteuerveranlagung) after filing the tax declaration for the tax period (Veranlagungszeitraum) in which the dividend was received. Furthermore, in the context of the consolidated tax group, a transfer of profit under commercial law, contrary to distribution of a dividend, is not subject to the fictive 5% prohibition on deducting business expenses (Betriebsausgabenabzugsverbot) under Section 8b para. 5 of the Corporation Tax Act.

In addition, the Parties are reviewing the prerequisites for establishing a consolidated tax group for VAT purposes in the context of entering into the domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement. A consolidated tax group for VAT purposes would have the benefit that the exchange of goods and services between the Parties would be exempt from VAT.

3. Alternatives

The management of Diebold KGaA and the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG have examined alternatives to entering into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement. They have concluded that no other structural measures are equally suitable for achieving the goals described above. In particular, the following other possibilities have been examined:

-49-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

3.1 Entering into an isolated domination agreement or an isolated profit-and-loss transfer agreement

Entering into an isolated domination agreement is legally permissible. However, without entering into a profit-and-loss transfer agreement a consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax (ertragsteuerliche Organschaft) cannot be established. Further, an isolated domination agreement does not allow for the transfer of profits. The intended tax benefits as well as the liquidity advantage resulting from the transfer of profits would accordingly not be achievable by concluding an isolated domination agreement.

Entering into an isolated profit-and-loss transfer agreement would also be legally permissible. However, this would not be a sufficient legal basis for the intended comprehensive cooperation between Wincor Nixdorf AG and the Diebold Group. As has been described, close cooperation in a legally safe manner is only possible if the existing de facto corporate group is placed on a contractual basis by means of a domination agreement, which procures a right to issue instructions (see Section III.1.1-1.3). An optimized structure of the corporate group in terms of the tax situation and the control structures can only be achieved when both elements are combined.

For this reason, the Parties intend to implement the domination and profit- and loss transfer agreement. This kind of agreement appropriately takes into account the interests of outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders by way of Recurring Compensation (as defined below) and Exit Compensation (as defined below) and is a proven instrument in the practice of German Stock Corporation law.

3.2 Entering into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement with Diebold Inc.

Entering into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement between Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf AG is not an option because this would not establish a consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax (ertragsteuerliche Organschaft). A netting of profits and losses with a US parent company would only be possible if, unlike in the present case, the requirements for attributing the participation in the group company and the income of the group company to a domestic permanent establishment were met. Entering into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. would therefore not have had the intended income tax benefits.

-50-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

3.3 Exclusion of the minority shareholders (squeeze-out)

Excluding the minority shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG pursuant to Sections 327a et seq. of the Stock Corporation Act (so-called squeeze-out under Stock Corporation Act, aktienrechtlicher Squeeze-out) would not be possible at the present time because the participation of Diebold KGaA in Wincor Nixdorf AG does not reach the required statutory level of at least 95% of the share capital. The same applies to the so-called squeeze-out pursuant to the German Takeover Act (WpÜG) (übernahmerechtlicher Squeeze-out) pursuant to Sections 39a et seq. of the German Takeover Act (WpÜG).

This applies similarly to an exclusion of minority shareholders pursuant to Section 62 para. 5 of the German Transformation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz) in connection with Sections 327a et seq. of the Stock Corporation Act after a merger (so-called squeeze-out pursuant to the German Transformation Act (Umwandlungsgesetz), umwandlungsrechtlicher Squeeze-out) which would require a participation of 90% of the share capital in Wincor Nixdorf AG.

Apart from that, the legal restrictions described in Section III.1.2 resulting from a de facto corporate group would also exist in the case of a 100% shareholding of Diebold KGaA in Wincor Nixdorf AG without the Agreement as long as Wincor Nixdorf AG has the legal form of a stock corporation or a European Company (Societas Europaea) with its seat in Germany. A consolidated tax group for purposes of income tax (ertragsteuerliche Organschaft) could also not be established without entering into a profit-and-loss transfer agreement.

3.4 Integration

Integration into a corporate group by way of absorption (Sections 319 et seq. of the Stock Corporation Act) (Eingliederung) is precluded in the present case. Diebold KGaA does not have the level of shareholding of at least 95% of the share capital in Wincor Nixdorf AG as required for an absorption (Section 320 para. 1 sentence 1 of the Stock Corporation Act). Moreover, according to the prevailing view in legal publications, the integration would require that both participants are German stock corporations (Aktiengesellschaften) or European Companies (Societas Europaea) with their registered seats in Germany. Presumably, the integration of Wincor Nixdorf AG would therefore not be permissible without the transformation of Diebold KGaA into a German stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) or European Company (Societas Europaea) with its registered seat in Germany.

-51-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

3.5 Merger

A merger of Diebold KGaA into Wincor Nixdorf AG (so-called “downstream merger”) is also precluded as an alternative structure, just as a merger of Wincor Nixdorf AG into Diebold KGaA (so called “upstream merger”) is precluded.

A downstream merger of Diebold KGaA into Wincor Nixdorf AG is not a suitable alternative, because Diebold KGaA would cease to exist as a separate legal entity. Such a measure would also not change the requirement for a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement in order to implement the desired integration of Wincor Nixdorf AG into the Diebold Group. Wincor Nixdorf AG would then have to enter into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement with Diebold Inc. This would lead to a cross-border domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement, which does not have the advantageous tax effects of the desired consolidated tax group described in Section III.2.

An upstream merger is also not a suitable alternative. In this situation, the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders would obtain a participation in Diebold KGaA. Since a listing on the stock exchange is not intended for the shares in Diebold KGaA, this would result in the loss of the listing of the Wincor Nixdorf Shares on the stock exchange, which would in turn adversely affect the ability to trade the Wincor Nixdorf Shares.

3.6 Change of legal form

A transformation of Wincor Nixdorf AG into a different corporate form or a partnership is also not an option.

A change in corporate form would not help to establish the desired consolidated tax group (see Section III.2). Furthermore, even a transformation into a partnership limited by shares (Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien) would not affect the applicability of the rules on the de facto corporate group and, accordingly, would not change the disadvantages existing compared to a situation with a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement (see Sections III.1.2 and III.1.3). After a transformation into a limited liability company (Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung) or a partnership (Personengesellschaft), instructions in the interest of the corporate group would still have to be examined in each individual case with regard to whether they have an adverse impact on Wincor Nixdorf AG as described in Section III.1.2. The fiduciary duty of the controlling company existing as a result of membership (mitgliedschaftliche Treuepflicht) would likewise have to be observed in the relationship to a limited liability company or a partnership so that the implementation of adverse measures would be problematic.

-52-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

4. Conclusion

Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold KGaA believe that a close cooperation between the involved companies after the Agreement takes effect will strengthen the strategic development and expansion of the Diebold Group into a premium service and software company and enable it to achieve synergies, inter alia through product consolidation, the rationalization of services in overlapping regions as well as improved purchase conditions.

Entering into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement allows to overcome the restrictions of a de facto corporate group (see Section III.1) and to establish a consolidated tax group for purposes of corporate income tax and trade tax (see Section III.2). The creation of a contractual corporate group thus expands and reinforces the possibilities for cooperation between the two companies and ensures greater flexibility, faster and more efficient decision-making and cost savings, particularly through elimination auditing and documentation requirements, in comparison with a de facto corporate group.

In light of the above, a domination and profit-and-loss agreement provides a sufficient legal basis for the intended integration of Wincor Nixdorf AG into the Diebold Group.

IV. DOMINATION AND PROFIT-AND-LOSS TRANSFER AGREEMENT

1. Explanation of the content of the contract

The individual provisions of the Agreement, the final draft of which is attached to this Report, are explained below.

1.1 Managerial control (Article 1 of the Agreement)

Article 1 of the Agreement contains the constitutive provision for a domination agreement under which Wincor Nixdorf AG, as the controlled company, submits the management of its company to Diebold KGaA as the controlling company. Diebold KGaA is accordingly entitled to issue general as well as case-by-case instructions to the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG with regard to the management of the company (Article 1 para. 1 of the Agreement). Notwithstanding this right to issue instructions, Wincor Nixdorf

-53-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

AG will continue to be a legally independent company with its own corporate bodies. Accordingly, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG continues to be responsible for the management and the representation of the company. To the extent no instructions have been issued, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is entitled to and must manage the company on its own responsibility.

The scope of the right to exercise managerial control and the right to issue instructions is governed primarily by Section 308 of the Stock Corporation Act. The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is required to comply with permissible instructions of Diebold KGaA (Article 1 para. 2 of the Agreement). Pursuant to Section 308 para. 1 sentence 2 of the Stock Corporation Act, instructions which are disadvantageous for Wincor Nixdorf AG can also be issued if they serve the interests of Diebold KGaA or the companies affiliated with Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf AG in the corporate group. The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is not entitled to refuse to comply with an instruction unless the instruction obviously does not serve these interests. The management board does not have to follow any impermissible instructions, e.g., instructions which would violate statutory provisions or provisions in the articles of association of Wincor Nixdorf AG. Instructions which endanger the existence of Wincor Nixdorf AG are impermissible as well. In the opinion of the Parties, a controlled company is also not required to comply with instructions if and as long as the controlling company does not fulfil its obligations under the domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement to assume losses or to the extent that the controlling company will most likely not be able to comply with this obligation (with regard to the right of the controlled company to terminate see Section IV.1.7.4). Furthermore, instructions to amend, maintain or terminate the Agreement can also not be issued pursuant to Section 299 of the Stock Corporation Act (Article 1 para. 1 sentence 3 of the Agreement).

The right of managerial control and the right to issue instructions only exists towards the management board but not towards the supervisory board, the general shareholders’ meeting or employees of Wincor Nixdorf AG and also not towards the corporate bodies or employees of any subsidiary of Wincor Nixdorf AG. If the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is instructed to engage in a transaction which requires the consent of the supervisory board and if the supervisory board does not consent or if the consent is not issued within a reasonable period of time, the consent of the supervisory board can be substituted in accordance with Section 308 para. 3 of the Stock Corporation Act by repeating the instruction. The participation rights of the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG are not affected by the Agreement.

-54-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Any instruction must be issued in text form within the meaning of Section 126 b of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB), e.g., by telefax or email (Article 1 para. 3 sentence 1 of the Agreement)., If the instructions are issued orally, they shall be confirmed in text form without undue delay.

Pursuant to Section 294 para. 2 of the Stock Corporation Act, and Article 7 para. 2 of the Agreement, the right of Diebold KGaA to issue instructions and the corresponding duty of Wincor Nixdorf AG to comply with Article 1 of the Agreement exist only after the Agreement has become effective as a result of its registration in the commercial register of Wincor Nixdorf AG (see Section IV.1.7.2).

1.2 Transfer of profit (Article 2 of the Agreement)

Article 2 of the Agreement contains the constitutive provision for a profit-and -loss transfer agreement under which Wincor Nixdorf AG is required to transfer its entire profit to Diebold KGaA during the term of the Agreement (Article 2 para. 1 sentence 1 of the Agreement). With regard to the scope of the profit to be transferred – subject to an establishment or a dissolution of reserves under Article 2 para. 2 of the Agreement – Article 2 para. 1 sentence 2 of the Agreement refers to the statutory provision in Section 301 of the Stock Corporation Act as amended from time to time. Based on the current version of Section 301 of the Stock Corporation Act, that profit must be transferred which would arise as annual profit if no profit transfer arrangements were in place, as reduced by any loss carry forward from the previous year and by the amount which must be allocated to the statutory reserve pursuant to Section 300 of the Stock Corporation Act and the amount which is blocked from distribution under Section 268 para. 8 of the German Commercial Code. The amount which must be allocated to the statutory reserve is assessed in accordance with Section 300 no. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act and depends on the amount of the share capital, the annual profit and the amount already allocated to the statutory reserve. At the present time, the statutory reserve of Wincor Nixdorf AG has been established in the full amount. The allocation of additional amounts under Section 300 no. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act is not required when the statutory reserve has been established in full.

-55-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The distribution barrier (Ausschüttungssperre) pursuant to Section 268 para. 8 sentence 1 of the German Commercial Code applies if intangible assets created by the company itself are capitalized as fixed assets in the balance sheet (Section 248 para. 2 sentence 1 of the German Commercial Code). In this event, profits can only be distributed to the extent that freely available reserves plus a profit carry forward and minus any loss carry forward correspond after the distribution at least to the total recorded value of the internally generated intangible assets minus the deferred tax liabilities established for this purpose. If deferred tax assets are capitalized in the balance sheet (Section 274 para. 1 sentence 2 of the German Commercial Code), after the distribution of profits the freely available reserves plus a profit carry forward and minus any loss carry forward must at least correspond to the deferred tax assets minus the deferred tax liabilities (Section 268 para. 8 sentence 2 of the German Commercial Code). In the case of assets which cannot be accessed by any creditor and which serve exclusively to fulfil pension obligations or comparable long-term obligations (Section 246 para. 2 sentence 2 of the German Commercial Code), after the distribution of profits the freely available reserves plus a profit carry forward and minus any loss carry forward pursuant to Section 268 para. 8 sentence 3 of the German Commercial Code must therefore at least correspond to the difference between the total of the present value (Zeitwerte) for these assets shown in the balance sheet minus the deferred tax liabilities established therefore and the procurement costs of these assets. The term “freely available reserves” includes both profit reserves as well as specific capital reserves. Profit reserves which can be distributed without any statutory provisions or provisions in the articles of association limiting such distribution as well as the freely available capital reserve under Section 272 para. 2 no. 4 of the German Commercial Code must be taken into account when determining the maximum amount that can be distributed.

The amount to be transferred as profit according to Article 2 para. 1 of the Agreement is reduced pursuant to Article 2 para. 2 sentence 1 of the Agreement if and to the extent Wincor Nixdorf AG, with the written approval of Diebold KGaA, allocates amounts from the annual profit arising without the profit transfer to other profit reserves (Section 272 para. 3 sentence 2 of the German Commercial Code). With regards to the consolidated tax group for income tax purposes (see Section IV.1.7.4), the allocation to these other profit reserves is only recognized to the extent that there is economic justification for this under a reasonable commercial assessment (Section 14 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 4 of the Corporation Tax Act). Article 2 para. 2 sentence 1 of the Agreement takes this standard into account. If amounts are allocated to other

-56-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

profit reserves (Section 272 para. 3 sentence 2 of the German Commercial Code) during the contractual period, these amounts can, according to Article 2 para. 2 sentence 2 of the Agreement, be withdrawn from the other profit reserves and transferred as profit (Section 301 sentence 2 of the Stock Corporation Act).

Furthermore, Article 2 para. 2 sentence 3 of the Agreement stipulates that other reserves or a profit carry forward resulting from the time prior to the beginning of the Agreement cannot be transferred as profit or used to offset any annual loss. The term “other reserves” includes all reserves according to Section 272 of the German Commercial Code with the exception of other profit reserves that have been established during the term of the Agreement. Therefore, the statutory reserve, reserves in accordance with the articles of association as well as the capital reserves are excluded from contractual transfer regardless of when they were established. Likewise, other profit reserves within the meaning of Section 272 para. 3 sentence 2 of the German Commercial Code that have been established in the time prior to the beginning of the Agreement are excluded from transfer. This provision corresponds to the requirements of Section 301 of the Stock Corporation Act and the decisions of the highest courts on the use of reserves in the context of a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement.

The obligation to transfer profit applies for the first time to the entire profits generated in the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which the Agreement becomes effective upon registration with the commercial register at the registered seat of Wincor Nixdorf AG pursuant to Article 7 para. 2 of the Agreement. Hence, if registration occurs after September 30, 2016 and by September 30, 2017, the obligation to transfer profit applies for the first time for the entire profit generated in the fiscal year that begins on October 1, 2016. The obligation is in each case due upon approval of the respective annual financial statement of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

1.3 Assumption of losses (Article 3 of the Agreement)

Article 3 para. 1 of the Agreement stipulates the obligation of Diebold KGaA to assume the losses of Wincor Nixdorf AG pursuant to Section 302 of the Stock Corporation Act in its respectively valid version. Pursuant to Section 302 para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act in its current form, this means that Diebold KGaA must compensate for any annual loss that would arise otherwise during the term of the Agreement, i.e., that would arise if no obligation to assume the losses was in existence. The obligation to assume

-57-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

losses does not exist to the extent that the annual loss is offset by amounts being withdrawn from the other profit reserves (Section 272 para. 3 sentence 2 of the German Commercial Code) which have been allocated to the profit reserves during the term of the Agreement.

The obligation to assume losses ensures that the equity capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG as accounted for at the time the Agreement becomes effective will not deplete during the term of the Agreement. This obligation to assume losses therefore serves to secure the financial interests of Wincor Nixdorf AG, its shareholders and its creditors during the existence of the Agreement.

Pursuant to Article 3 para. 2 of the Agreement, the obligation to assume losses applies for the first time for the entire fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which the Agreement becomes effective upon registration with the commercial register at the registered office of Wincor Nixdorf AG (see on this point Article 7 para. 2 of the Agreement). If the Agreement is registered after September 30, 2016 and by September 30, 2017, the obligation therefore exists for any potential loss in the fiscal year ending September 30, 2017. The obligation is in each case due at the end of the respective fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

In the event that the Agreement is ended during a fiscal year, and specifically in the event of termination for cause (wichtiger Grund) (see Section IV.1.7.4), Diebold KGaA is, pursuant to Section 3 para. 3 of the Agreement, required to assume the deficit of Wincor Nixdorf AG, as shown in the balance sheet to be drawn up for the date of the effectiveness of the termination.

1.4 Recurring Compensation (Article 4 of the Agreement)

As soon as the Agreement becomes effective, an obligation is then triggered under Section 304 para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act to grant adequate recurring compensation to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders. In order to fulfil this obligation, Diebold KGaA makes an undertaking to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders that it will pay a fixed annual recurring cash compensation (“Recurring Compensation Payment” or “Recurring Compensation”) for the term of the Agreement.

After the profit transfer obligation becomes effective pursuant to Article 2 of the Agreement, thus for the first time for the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which the existence of Agreement is registered with the commercial register, Wincor Nixdorf AG will generally no longer record any balance sheet profit (aside from any profit from the liquidation of reserves which are not subject to

-58-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

the contractual profit transfer or a net profit due to a pre-contractual profit carried forward). Therefore, the possibility of the Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders to resolve upon the appropriation of any balance sheet profit generally ceases to exist as of that point in time. As compensation for the loss of their dividend entitlement, Article 4 para. 1 of the Agreement provides for an obligation on the part of Diebold KGaA to grant an adequate Recurring Compensation Payment to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders. The obligation to grant the Recurring Compensation Payment relates to the period for which a profit transfer pursuant to article 2 of the Agreement is effective and exists for the duration of the Agreement. The Recurring Compensation Payment is due, pursuant to Article 4 para. 2 sentence 5 of the Agreement, on the first banking day following the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG for the previous fiscal year, but at the latest eight months after expiration of this fiscal year.

1.4.1 Type of Recurring Compensation

The following outline summarizes certain considerations in connection with the type of Recurring Compensation:

(i) Legal basis

If there is an isolated domination agreement, then this must guarantee to the outside shareholders as adequate compensation a certain annual share of profit (Section 304 para. 1 sentence 2 of the Stock Corporation Act). Should the parties conclude an isolated profit-and-loss transfer agreement, by contrast, it must provide for adequate compensation by a recurring compensation payment (Section 304 para. 1 sentence 1 of the Stock Corporation Act). In the event of a combined domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement, the obligation to a recurring compensation payment substitutes the obligation to guarantee a certain annual share of profit in all business years where the profit-and-loss transfer agreement exists alongside the domination agreement. The recurring compensation payment must consist of a recurring payment of cash to the outside shareholders for each share (Section 304 para. 1 sentence 1 of the Stock Corporation Act). The Stock Corporation Act differentiates between two types of recurring compensation (see sub-Sections (a) and (b) below)

-59-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(a) Fixed recurring compensation

In any event, the Recurring Compensation can be warranted as an annually recurring payment of a fixed amount in cash. If the Agreement provides for a fixed recurring compensation, the recurring compensation payment must correspond to the amount which could – according to the earnings position of the controlled company to date and its future prospects for earnings, taking into account reasonable depreciation and adjustments in value but without establishing other profit reserves – most likely be allocated to the individual share as an average share in the profits, i.e. as profit able to be distributed under commercial law (Section 304 para. 2 sentence 1 of the Stock Corporation Act).

(b) Variable recurring compensation

If the other contracting party, i.e. the controlling company, is a German stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) or a European Company (Societas Europaea) with its seat in Germany or a partnership limited by shares (Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien), a variable recurring compensation which is based on the profit of the other contracting party can alternatively be promised as recurring compensation payment. In that case, the variable recurring compensation must correspond to the amount which accrues to shares of the controlling company as a share in the profit based on the establishment of a reasonable conversion ratio (Section 304 para. 2 sentence 2 and 3 of the Stock Corporation Act).

Even if a variable recurring compensation would be legally possible in specific instance, the Agreement does not have to provide for a fixed recurring compensation and, alternatively, an additional variable recurring compensation. Rather, the Parties can decide in favor of one or the other type of recurring compensation also in this situation.

(ii) Reasons for determining a fixed Recurring Compensation

The Agreement between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold KGaA provides for a fixed annual Recurring Compensation. The reasons for this are primarily as follows:

-60-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Diebold KGaA as the controlling company is a partnership limited by shares and therefore, in principle, the payment of a variable recurring compensation based on the profit of Diebold KGaA could have been provided for. However, in this case, a fixed recurring compensation has been provided for as such a variable recurring compensation based on the profit of Diebold KGaA would not be suitable to ensure the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders’ right to receive adequate recurring compensation. As the participation in Wincor Nixdorf AG is by far the most valuable current asset of Diebold KGaA, the Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders would thus economically receive a recurring compensation that is based on the profit of Wincor Nixdorf AG only. Diebold KGaA could in fact exercise its managerial control over Wincor Nixdorf AG on the basis of the Agreement in a way that reduces profits of Wincor Nixdorf AG. This would in consequence also lead to a lower recurring compensation for the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders.

Even when, as proposed by parts of the legal literature, the variable recurring compensation would be calculated based on the profit of Diebold Inc. as the group parent company rather than on the profit of Diebold KGaA, such calculation method would have substantial disadvantages compared to the determination of a fixed recurring compensation:

The calculation of a variable recurring compensation would require a valuation of Diebold Inc. and all of its affiliated companies. This would have caused significant additional efforts in the preparation of the Agreement. Furthermore, risks would arise due to the currency fluctuations of U.S. dollars and Euros, as Diebold Inc. is a company based in the United States.

In case of a variable recurring compensation, the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG would be guaranteed a share of the actual distributed profit of Diebold Inc., which – in case of a merger of Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. based on an adequate conversation ratio – would be attributable to the shares of the outside shareholders as shareholders of the (fictitious) legal entity resulting from such merger. The variable recurring compensation would therewith depend on the controlling company’s dividend and reinvestment policy, respectively. In this context, the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) (order of

-61-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

September 8, 1999, case no. 1 BvR 301/89), ruled that the outside shareholders are at least to be protected from an “abusive dividend policy” (missbräuchliche Dividendenpolitik) as well as an “abusive profit retention” (missbräuchliche Gewinnthesaurierung). However, clear rules as to when the controlling company’s dividend and reinvestment policy shall be considered with legal certainty as “abusive” do not exist. This legal uncertainty can be avoided by the agreement of a fixed recurring compensation.

1.4.2 Determination of the Recurring Compensation as gross payment, amount of the Recurring Compensation

Pursuant to Article 4 of the Agreement, Diebold KGaA grants to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders a Recurring Compensation for the term in which the Agreement is effective. The amount as well as the determination of the adequate Recurring Compensation are explained and substantiated in more detail in the following and in Section V.2.

(i) Amount of the Recurring Compensation

Article 4 para. 1 in conjunction with Article 4 para. 2 of the Agreement provides the payment of a Recurring Compensation per Wincor Nixdorf Share in the amount of €2.85 (corresponding to an amount of €3.17 before current corporate tax and the solidarity surcharge) for each full fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG. Each year, this amount will become due in full as no balance sheet profit will be reported any longer after the obligation to transfer profit has become effective (aside from any profit from the liquidation of reserves which are not subject to the contractual profit transfer or a net profit due to a pre-contractual profit carried forward), and Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders will have no longer the possibility to decide about the appropriation of the balance sheet profit.

(ii) Adjustment mechanism for the Recurring Compensation

When determining the Recurring Compensation pursuant to article 2 of the Agreement, the Parties took into consideration the case law of the Federal Supreme Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof, “BGH”) (order of July 21, 2003, case no. II ZB 17/01 – “Ytong”). In this ruling, the BGH decided that outside shareholders must be granted a recurring compensation for purposes of Section 304 para. 1 sentence 1, para. 2 sentence 1 and 2 of the Stock Corporation Act that corresponds to the

-62-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

gross share in the likely distributable profit from which, in a second step, the burden of corporate income tax in the respective statutory amount must then be deducted. This calculation method shall ensure that a decrease in the corporate income tax rate compared to the rate at the time of the effective date of the valuation will not lead to an unjustified benefit of the other contracting party (the controlling company) at the expense of the outside shareholders. Conversely, in the case of a tax increase this calculation method shall avoid an unjustified benefit for the outside shareholders at the expense of the other contracting party (the controlling company). These principles are also applicable accordingly to the solidarity surcharge levied as a surcharge on the corporate income tax.

Based on the above described principles of the Federal Supreme Court of Justice, the fixed Recurring Compensation in the form of the Recurring Compensation Payment must be determined as a share in the gross profit per Wincor Nixdorf Share (Bruttoausgleichsbetrag, “Gross Compensation Amount”), of which the corporate income tax together with the solidarity surcharge must be deducted at the rates that are applicable for the respective fiscal year for which a Recurring Compensation is paid (Nettoausgleichsbetrag, “Net Compensation Amount”), whereby this deduction is to be effected only on any portion of the Gross Compensation Amount from profits which are subject to German corporate income tax. This ensures that any change in the corporate income tax rate or the solidarity surcharge will result in a corresponding adjustment of the Net Compensation Amount. Consequently, Article 4 para. 2 of the Agreement provides for a variable provision with respect to corporate income tax and solidarity surcharge.

Based on the circumstances at the time of signing of this Report, a total of €3.17 per Wincor Nixdorf Share corresponding to the 15% corporate income tax plus 5.5% solidarity surcharge must be deducted from the Gross Compensation Amount in the amount of €0.32 per Wincor Nixdorf Share. Based on the circumstances at the time of signing of this Report, this results in a Recurring Compensation of €2.85 per Wincor Nixdorf Share for each full fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

The mechanism for the potential adjustment of the Recurring Compensation in the case of future changes of the tax rate will be explained using the following example: If the corporate income tax

-63-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

decreases by one percentage point (from 15.0% to 14.0%), the provision in Article 4 para. 2 of the Agreement has the effect that the current deduction of €0.32 per Wincor Nixdorf Share for corporate income tax and the solidarity surcharge will be reduced by an amount of €0.02 (1.0% plus 5.5% solidarity surcharge and, together, 1.055% of a portion of the Gross Compensation Amount from profits which is subject to German corporate income tax). This increases the Net Compensation Amount of €2.85 per Wincor Nixdorf Share by an amount of €0.02 to €2.87 per Wincor Nixdorf Share. On the other hand, an increase in the corporate income tax by one percentage point would lead to a reduction of the Net Compensation Amount from €2.85 per Wincor Nixdorf Share by €0.02 to €2.83 per Wincor Nixdorf Share.

Article 4 para. 2 sentence 4 of the Agreement provides that any withholding tax (such as capital gains tax (Kapitalertragsteuer)) will be withheld from the Net Compensation Amount to the extent required by law. This also applies to the solidarity surcharge charged as a supplementary tax. For details on this issue reference is made to Sections IV.4.1 and IV.4.2.

(iii) Contingency upon the base interest rate at the time of the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG

The determinative date for the determination of the enterprise valuation and the determination of the adequate Recurring Compensation is the scheduled date of the annual general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG which will vote on the Agreement, i.e. September 26, 2016.

The aforementioned statements as to the amount and determination of the adequate Recurring Compensation, including the adjustment mechanism, are based on the base interest rate as of the date of signing of this Report of 0.70%. The base interest rate forms part of the discount rate which is relevant for the enterprise valuation. The base interest rate is determined according to the customary local interest rate for a (quasi) risk-free capital market investment, i.e. in the Federal Republic of Germany generally the interest rate for government bonds. Regarding further details of the base interest rate, reference is made to the Valuation Report of PwC, in particular no. 315 et seqq. (Annex 5).

-64-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

In the current market environment, it cannot be ruled out that the base interest rate will change in a relevant scope for the calculation of the Recurring Compensation requiring adaption between the date of this Report and the date of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled on September 26, 2016.

In the event that at the time of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled for September 26, 2016, the base interest rate will be 0.6%, the Agreement will stipulate a Recurring Compensation per Wincor Nixdorf Share in the amount of presently €2.83 (this corresponds to an amount of €3.15 before current corporate income tax and solidarity surcharge). The gross amount contains an amount of €1.98 attributable to profits chargeable with German corporate income tax (plus solidarity surcharge) and of which, according to the conditions at the time of this Report, a total of €0.31 (rounded) per Wincor Nixdorf Share will have to be subtracted.

In the event that at the time of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled for September 26, 2016, the base interest rate will be 0.5%, the Agreement will stipulate a Recurring Compensation per Wincor Nixdorf Share in the amount of presently €2.82 (this corresponds to an amount of €3.13 before current corporate income tax and solidarity surcharge). The gross amount contains an amount of €1.97 attributable to profits chargeable with German corporate income tax (plus solidarity surcharge) and of which, according to the tax conditions at the time of this Report, a total of €0.31 per Wincor Nixdorf Share will have to be subtracted.

In the event that at the time of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled for September 26, 2016, the base interest rate will be 0.8%, the Agreement will stipulate a Recurring Compensation per Wincor Nixdorf Share in the amount of presently €2.87 (this corresponds to an amount of €3.18 before current corporate income tax and solidarity surcharge). The gross amount contains an amount of €2.01 attributable to profits chargeable with German corporate income tax (plus solidarity surcharge) and of which, according to the tax conditions at the time of this Report, a total of €0.32 (rounded) per Wincor Nixdorf Share will have to be subtracted.

-65-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

For the purpose of determining the adequate Recurring Compensation at a base interest rate of 0.7%, on the one hand, and 0.6%, 0.5% and 0.8%, on the other hand, reference is also made to 400 et seqq. of the Valuation Report (Annex 5).

In the current market environment it further cannot be ruled out that the base interest rate may even decrease below 0.5% or increase above 0.8%. Such a change in interest rate levels would affect the calculation of the Recurring Compensation beyond the scenarios described above. The effect of a change of the base interest rate between the day of this Report and the day of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG on the determination of the adequate Recurring Compensation are described in more detail under no. 408 of the Valuation Report (Annex 5) and to be agreed upon mutually between the Parties.

1.4.3 Other explanations on Article 4 of the Agreement

The Recurring Compensation Payment is granted starting from the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which the Agreement becomes effective pursuant to Article 7 para. 2 of the Agreement (Article 4 para. 3 of the Agreement). Should the Agreement become effective by September 30, 2017, there shall be – on the basis of the current fiscal year – an obligation for the 2016/2017 fiscal year to transfer profit from October 1, 2016 onwards. If the Agreement only becomes effective in a subsequent year, then the obligation to transfer profit shall only apply from said subsequent fiscal year onwards.

Once the obligation to transfer profits becomes effective, the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders have no claim for a dividend unless a balance sheet profit exists or is created from reserves or a profit carry forward from the time prior to the beginning of the Agreement and the general shareholders’ meeting resolves a distribution of such balance sheet profit.

If the Agreement ends during the course of a fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG or if a Recurring Compensation must be paid for a partial fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG that lasts for less than twelve months, the Recurring Compensation for this fiscal year is reduced proportionally (Article 4 para. 4 of the Agreement). This takes into account the circumstance that the fixed amount of the Recurring Compensation is assessed on the basis of a period of twelve months, i.e. a full fiscal year.

Article 4 para. 5 sentence 1 of the Agreement governs the adjustment of the Recurring Compensation in the event of a capital increase by Wincor Nixdorf AG from the company’s own funds. If new Wincor Nixdorf Shares are issued on the occasion of a capital increase from the company’s own funds, the Gross

-66-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Compensation Amount per Wincor Nixdorf Share is reduced to such an extent that the total amount of the Gross Compensation Amount remains the same. The change in the number of Wincor Nixdorf Shares held by an outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder resulting from a capital increase using the company’s own funds therefore does not affect the total amount of the Recurring Compensation to which the Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder is entitled. This is appropriate because a capital increase using the company’s own funds, i.e. the conversion of profit or certain capital reserves into share capital, does not influence the value and the earning power of the company, and because the new Wincor Nixdorf Shares resulting from the capital increase using the company’s own funds are issued to the Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders without consideration. This also corresponds to the statutory provision in Section 216 para. 3 of the Stock Corporation Act under which the economic content of contractual relationships of the company to third parties is not affected by a capital increase using the company’s own funds. If no new Wincor Nixdorf Shares are issued in the context of the capital increase using the company’s own funds, an adjustment of the Recurring Compensation is not required.

If the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG is increased by issuing new Wincor Nixdorf Shares against cash contributions or contributions in kind, the claim to the Recurring Compensation also extends to the newly created Wincor Nixdorf Shares resulting from the capital increase. Article 4 para. 5 sentence 2 of the Agreement ensures that not only the claims to Recurring Compensation of the previous outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders remain unaffected but also that new outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders are treated equally in the case of such increases in the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

Article 4 para. 6 of the Agreement serves the purpose of protection and ensures the non-discriminatory treatment of all outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders. If a Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder claims that the offered Recurring Compensation is set too low, the Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder can request from the court in appraisal proceedings (Spruchverfahren) pursuant to Section 1 no. 1 of the German Act on Appraisal Proceedings (Spruchverfahrensgesetz, “Appraisal Proceedings Act”), that the court determine the adequate Recurring Compensation Payment. The provision in Article 4 para. 6 sentence 1 of the Agreement grants to all outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders a claim for an increase of the received Recurring Compensation Payments if appraisal proceedings take place and if the court sets a higher Recurring Compensation Payment in an order which can no longer be appealed (rechtskräftig). The same applies pursuant to Article 4 para. 6 sentence 2 of the Agreement if Diebold KGaA commits itself against an outside Wincor Nixdorf

-67-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Shareholder in a court settlement (gerichtlicher Vergleich) to pay a higher Recurring Compensation in order to avoid or to end a proceeding according to Section 1 no. 1 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act. These claims also exist for those Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders who have accepted the Exit Compensation offer under Article 5 of the Agreement in the meantime. Furthermore, these claims also exist irrespective of whether the Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder was involved in any appraisal proceedings (see Section 13 sentence 2 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act).

1.5 Exit Compensation (Article 5 of the Agreement)

1.5.1 Type of compensation

In addition to the obligation to grant the Recurring Compensation in the form of the Recurring Compensation Payment pursuant to Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act, the Agreement must contain an obligation of Diebold KGaA to purchase the shares of an outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder upon his request in exchange for adequate Exit Compensation (the “Exit Compensation”) determined in the Agreement (Section 305 para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act). In accordance with Section 305 para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act, Diebold KGaA offers a cash exit compensation in the amount of €53.34 per Wincor Nixdorf Share to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders who would like to divest their Wincor Nixdorf shareholding on the occasion of entering into the Agreement (Article 5 para. 1 of the Agreement).

With a view to the type of exit compensation, the Stock Corporation Act distinguishes among three categories:

(i) Exit Compensation in shares of the other – independent and not majority owned – contracting party

If the other contracting party (Diebold KGaA) is an independent and not a majority-owned German stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) or partnership limited by shares with its registered seat in a member state of the European Union or in another state that is a party to the Treaty on the European Economic Area or a European Company (Societas Europaea) with its registered seat in Germany, the Agreement shall provide for the granting of treasury shares of such company as exit compensation (Section 305 para. 2 sentence 1 of the Stock Corporation Act).

-68-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(ii) Choice between cash Exit Compensation and Exit Compensation in shares of the company with seat in the European Union holding a controlling or a majority interest in the other contracting party

If the other contracting party (Diebold KGaA) is a controlled or majority-owned German stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) or partnership limited by shares, or a European Company (Societas Europaea) with its registered seat in Germany and the controlling company is a German stock corporation (Aktiengesellschaft) or a partnership limited by shares with its registered seat in a member state of the European Union or in another state that is a party to the Treaty on the European Economic Area, or a European Company (Societas Europaea) with its registered seat in Germany, the Agreement shall provide for either the granting of shares of the company holding the controlling or majority interest in the other contracting party or for cash exit compensation (Section 305 para. 2 no. 2 of the Stock Corporation Act). In this case, the Agreement does not have to provide for both types of Exit Compensation. Rather, the Parties can rather choose one type of Exit Compensation.

(iii) Cash Exit Compensation

In all other cases, the Agreement needs to provide for a cash Exit Compensation (Section 305, para. 2 no. 3 of the Stock Corporation Act).

1.5.2 Amount of the Exit Compensation

The Agreement stipulates that Diebold KGaA is obliged to purchase the Wincor Nixdorf Shares of an outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder upon his request in exchange for adequate cash exit compensation (Section 305 para. 2 no. 3 of the Stock Corporation Act). Each outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder who wants to make use of the exit compensation offer receives an Exit Compensation within the meaning of Section 305 para. 2 no. 3 of the Stock Corporation Act in the amount of €53.34 per Wincor Nixdorf Share (Article 5 para. 1 of the Agreement). The amount as well as the determination of the adequate Exit Compensation are explained and substantiated in more detail in Section V.3.

-69-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

This amount of the determined Exit Compensation is a base interest rate as of this Report of 0.7%. For the effect of the base interest rate regarding the enterprise valuation and the possibility of a change until the date of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled for September 26, 2016, see above in Section IV.1.4.2(iii).

In the event that, at the time of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled for September 26, 2016, i.e. on the determinative date for determining the enterprise value and the Exit Compensation, the base interest rate is 0.6%, the Agreement will stipulate an Exit Compensation per Wincor Nixdorf Share in the amount of €54.17.

In the event that, at the time of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled for September 26, 2016, i.e. on the determinative date for determining the enterprise value and the Exit Compensation, the base interest rate is 0.5%, the Agreement will stipulate an Exit Compensation per Wincor Nixdorf Share in the amount of €55.02.

In the event that, at the time of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled for September 26, 2016, i.e. on the determinative date for determining the enterprise value and the Exit Compensation, the base interest rate is 0.8%, the Agreement will stipulate an Exit Compensation per Wincor Nixdorf Share in the amount of €52.54.

In the current market environment it further cannot be ruled out that the base interest rate may even decrease below 0.5% or increase above 0.8%. Such a change in interest rate levels would affect the calculation of the Exit Compensation beyond the scenarios described above. The effect of a change of the base interest rate between the day of this Report and the day of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG on the determination of the adequate Exit Compensation are described in more detail in particular in no. 399 of the Valuation Report (Annex 5) and to be agreed upon mutually between the Parties.

Further details regarding the amount and the determination of the adequate Exit Compensation are explained in Section V.3.

1.5.3 Reasons for granting a cash exit compensation

In particular, the following reasons were of importance for the granting of a cash exit compensation:

Diebold KGaA, as a wholly owned indirect subsidiary of Diebold Inc., is a controlled company within the meaning of the Stock Corporation Act (Sections 16 et. seq. of the Stock Corporation Act), so that the Agreement does

-70-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

not have to provide for exit compensation in shares of Diebold KGaA pursuant to Section 305 para. 2 no. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act. As explained in Section IV.1.5.1(i) above, this mandatory provision only applies to German stock corporations (Aktiengesellschaften) or European Companies (Societas Europaea) with its seat in Germany or partnerships limited by shares that are not controlled and not owned by a majority shareholder.

Furthermore, the Parties also do not have the option pursuant to Section 305 para. 2 no. 2 of the Stock Corporation Act to provide for exit compensation in shares of the company holding the controlling or majority interest in the other contracting party, i.e. in this case Diebold Inc. as the head of the Diebold Group. As described in Section IV.1.5.1(ii) above, this option only exists if the controlling company is domiciled in a member state of the European Union or in another state that is a party to the Treaty on the European Economic Area. This does not apply to Diebold Inc. with its corporate seat in the United States of America. Therefore, pursuant to Section 305 para. 2 no. 3 of the Stock Corporation Act, cash exit compensation must be granted.

For all these reasons, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA have decided to offer to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders cash exit compensation under the Agreement.

1.5.4 Other explanations on Article 5 of the Agreement

The obligation of Diebold KGaA to purchase the Wincor Nixdorf Shares in exchange for Exit Compensation is limited by time according to Article 5 para. 2 of the Agreement. The deadline ends two months after the date on which the registration of the existence of the Agreement in the commercial register at the registered office of Wincor Nixdorf AG is publicly announced pursuant to Section 10 of the German Commercial Code. The time limit on the offer for Exit Compensation is common and is permitted under the Stock Corporation Act. The provision of a two month deadline (Article 5 para. 2 sentence 2 of the Agreement) corresponds to the statutory provision in Section 305 para. 4 sentence 2 of the Stock Corporation Act.

Under Section 4 para. 1 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act, outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders can file a request for a court decision about the Exit Compensation to be granted within three months after the date on which the registration of the existence of the Agreement in the commercial register at the registered office of Wincor Nixdorf AG has been publicly announced pursuant to Section 10 of the German Commercial Code. Section 305 para. 4 sentence 3

-71-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

of the Stock Corporation Act stipulates that, in case of an application to the court to determine the Recurring Compensation or the Exit Compensation, the deadline for accepting the offer to transfer the shares to the controlling company against payment of the Exit Compensation ends at the earliest two months after the date on which the decision about the most recently decided application of a shareholder has been published in the Federal Gazette (Bundesanzeiger). Article 5 para. 2 sentence 3 of the Agreement clarifies that this statutory provision applies without any restriction. If appraisal proceedings are initiated, the deadline for accepting the Exit Compensation offer ends accordingly two months after the date on which the decision about the most recently decided application of a Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder has been published in the Federal Gazette.

The declaration of the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders that they want to accept the offer for the Exit Compensation from Diebold KGaA must be received by Diebold KGaA within the deadline that is determined as explained above. After expiration of the deadline, an acceptance of the offer for the Exit Compensation is no longer possible.

The outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders can decide to leave the company after registration of the existence of the Agreement in the commercial register and receive the offered Exit Compensation or they can instead decide to remain a shareholder of Wincor Nixdorf AG and receive the Recurring Compensation Payment offered in Article 4 of the Agreement.

Article 5 para. 3 of the Agreement addresses the scenario that Wincor Nixdorf AG implements a capital measure prior to expiration of the period pursuant to Article 5 para. 2 of the Agreement. Should such capital measures be implemented within this period, the Exit Compensation will be adjusted to the extent legally required. Reference is made to the corresponding explanations (Section IV.1.4.3 above).

Article 5 para. 4 of the Agreement serves the purpose of protection and ensures equal treatment of all outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders. In the event of proceedings pursuant to Section 1 no. 1 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act being initiated, this provision grants all outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders a claim on a supplement to the Exit Compensation already received, if the court determines legally binding a higher Exit Compensation or if Diebold KGaA undertakes to a Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder a higher Exit Compensation within a settlement or in order to avert or end proceedings pursuant to Section 1 no. 1 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act. This claim also exists if the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder has already been compensated, irrespective of whether the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder participated in such an appraisal proceeding.

-72-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Pursuant to Article 5 para. 5 of the Agreement, accepting the offer for the Exit Compensation is free of costs for the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders, provided that they have a domestic securities deposit account. This ensures that the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders are not burdened with fees, commissions or other processing fees of the banks in this regard and that they receive the Exit Compensation without any reduction. Taxes which accrue on any capital gain of an outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder are not affected by this. The respective outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder must bear these taxes himself. Reference is made to Section IV.4 with regard to the tax effects for the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders.

1.6 Right to Information (Article 6 of the Agreement)

Article 6 of the Agreement contains the provision after which Diebold KGaA, as the controlling company, is granted a right to information at any given time towards Wincor Nixdorf AG as the subordinate company. Pursuant to Section 6 sentence 1 of the Agreement, Diebold KGaA is entitled to inspect the books and records of Wincor Nixdorf AG at any time. According to Article 6 sentence 2 of the Agreement, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is required to supply Diebold KGaA with all requested information on all matters relating to Wincor Nixdorf AG at any time. In addition, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is required to keep Diebold KGaA continuously informed of business developments, and specifically of material transactions (Article 6 sentence 3 of the Agreement). The right to information shall enable Diebold KGaA to exercise its control rights relating to Wincor Nixdorf AG on basis of adequate information. For this purpose, Diebold KGaA is granted a general right to information which is supplemented by a separate reporting obligation of Wincor Nixdorf AG. This reporting obligation includes ongoing business developments as well as key business issues. This way, existing information asymmetries can be eliminated efficiently and Diebold KGaA will be in a position to give instructions based on all relevant information and in the best interest of the group.

-73-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

1.7 Effectiveness and term (Article 7 of the Agreement)

1.7.1 Effectiveness

In accordance with the statutory requirements for approval under Section 293 of the Stock Corporation Act, Article 7 para. 1 of the Agreement stipulates that the Agreement requires the consent of the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG as well as of Diebold KGaA in order to become effective. Diebold Inc. as the general partner of Diebold KGaA must also approve the Agreement for its effectiveness. The management of Diebold KGaA and both the management and supervisory board of Wincor Nixdorf AG have approved the final draft of the Agreement on August 16, 2016. The shareholders’ meetings of both Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf AG are expected to resolve on September 26, 2016, approving the Agreement and Diebold Inc., in its capacity as general partner of Diebold KGaA, will be required to consent to the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Diebold KGaA in order for the Agreement to become effective.

Furthermore, due to the statutory provision in Section 294 para. 2 of the Stock Corporation Act, the Agreement only becomes effective upon its registration in the commercial register at the registered office of Wincor Nixdorf AG (Article 7 para. 2 of the Agreement).

1.7.2 Beginning of the Agreement

(i) Effectiveness of the right of managerial control and the right to issue instructions pursuant to Article 1 of the Agreement

The right of managerial control and the right to issue instructions pursuant to article 1 of the Agreement applies as of the date on which the Agreement becomes effective by registration in the commercial register of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

(ii) Effectiveness of the transfer of profit pursuant to Article 2 of the Agreement

The obligation to transfer profit pursuant to article 2 of the Agreement applies for the first time to the entire profits of the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which the Agreement becomes effective upon registration with the commercial register of Wincor Nixdorf AG. If – as it is usually the case – the registration of the Agreement in the commercial register of Wincor Nixdorf AG does not coincide with the beginning of the fiscal year, the Agreement claims retroactive validity regarding the profit transfer agreement for the expired part of the fiscal year at the time of registration into the commercial register.

-74-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(iii) Effectiveness of the obligation to assume losses pursuant to Article 3 of the Agreement

The obligation to assume losses pursuant to article 3(2) applies for the first time for the entire fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which the Agreement becomes effective. If – as it is usually the case – the registration of the Agreement in the commercial register of Wincor Nixdorf AG does not coincide with the beginning of the fiscal year, the Agreement claims retroactive validity regarding the obligation to assume losses for the expired part of the fiscal year at the time of registration into the commercial register.

1.7.3 Duration of the Agreement / minimum term

Pursuant to Article 7 para. 3 sentence 1 of the Agreement, the Agreement is concluded for an indefinite period of time. However, according to Article 7 para. 3 sentence 3 of the Agreement, the Agreement has a fixed minimum term of five successive full time years as of the beginning of the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which this Agreement becomes effective. Accordingly, in the event that the Agreement becomes effective on October 1, 2016, the contractual minimum term would last until September 30, 2021. This fixed minimum term of the Agreement of five full successive years is required according to Section 14 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 3 of the Corporation Tax Act to establish a consolidated tax group for purposes of corporate income tax and trade tax between Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf AG. During the fixed minimum term set forth in Article 7 para. 3 of the Agreement, the right to give regular notice of termination is excluded.

1.7.4 Termination of the Agreement

During the fixed minimum term set forth in Article 7 para. 3 of the Agreement, i.e. of five successive full years as of the beginning of the fiscal year in which the Agreement becomes effective, the right to terminate the Agreement without cause is excluded. Accordingly, the Agreement can be terminated without cause for the first time by giving six months’ notice until the end of the minimum term (if said end of the minimum term falls at the end of a fiscal year) and, subsequently, with the same notice period until the end of the respective fiscal year (Article 7 para. 3 sentence 2 and 3 of the Agreement). The notice shall be in writing (Article 7 para. 7 of the Agreement).

-75-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

In accordance with Article 7 para. 4 of the Agreement, the provisions on the minimum term do not affect the right of the Parties to terminate the Agreement for cause (aus wichtigem Grund) without having to comply with a notice period. Cause for termination generally exists under civil law if a continuation of the contractual relationship can no longer be expected of the party giving notice of termination in light of all circumstances. Such a right to termination is required by law and cannot be excluded by contract. For example, a deterioration in the financial or earning position of the controlled Wincor Nixdorf AG, can entitle the controlling company, Diebold KGaA, to give notice of termination if the risks for the controlling company are no longer acceptable and the controlling company is not responsible for this situation. Vice versa, Wincor Nixdorf AG as the controlled company can, for example, give notice of termination if Diebold KGaA as controlling company is no longer able to fulfil its obligations under the Agreement (assumption of losses, Recurring Compensation and Exit Compensation) (see Section 297 para. 1 sentence 2 of the Stock Corporation Act), even taking into consideration the guarantee of Diebold Inc. Since Diebold Inc. as the general partner of Diebold KGaA is, besides Diebold KGaA itself, personally liable without limitation for the liabilities of Diebold KGaA (Section 278 paras. 1 and 2 of the Stock Corporation Act in conjunction with Sections 161 para. 2, 128 et seq. of the German Commercial Code), and this liability refers to all liabilities of Diebold KGaA and is not limited to a certain amount or certain assets, and since Diebold Inc. furthermore issued a so called unrestricted guarantee (harte Patronatserklärung), this is only conceivable if Diebold Inc. for its part would economically not be able to provide the corresponding financial means.

Pursuant to Article 7 para. 4 sentence 2 of the Agreement, cause exists in particular if the parent company (Diebold KGaA) disposes of or contributes (Einbringung) its participation in the subordinate company (Wincor Nixdorf AG), or in case of a merger (Verschmelzung), spin-off (Spaltung) or liquidation of the parent company or the subordinate company. This provision must be seen against the background of the applicable tax law: A profit-and-loss transfer agreement is concluded in order to establish a consolidated tax group for purposes of corporate income tax and trade tax. The status as a consolidated tax group for income tax purposes requires, among others, that the controlling company holds a majority of the voting rights in the controlled company for at least five years (Zeitjahre) (60 months) and is associated to the controlled company by a profit-and-loss transfer agreement (Section 14 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 3 of the Corporation Tax Act). However, it is recognized for tax purposes that the loss of the participation can constitute cause within the

-76-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

meaning of Section 14 para. 1 sentence 1 no. 3 of the Corporation Tax Act for early termination of an agreement by the controlling company which does not affect the recognition of the status of a consolidated tax group. This also applies accordingly in case of a merger (Verschmelzung), spin-off (Spaltung) or liquidation of the parent company or the subordinate company. Article 7 para. 4 sentence 2 of the Agreement adopts these tax law principles and ensures that if a termination for cause does not have a detrimental effect for tax purposes, Diebold KGaA is also entitled to terminate the Agreement for cause under civil law.

In the event that the Agreement is terminated for cause, the Agreement lapses at the end of the date stated in the notice of termination provided that this is no earlier than the day on which the notice of termination is served (Article 7 para. 5 of the Agreement).

In case of a termination of the Agreement, the statutory provision of Section 303 of the Stock Corporation Act also applies (Article 7 para. 6 of the Agreement): If a domination agreement or a profit-and-loss transfer agreement ends, the controlling company (Diebold KGaA) must provide security to the creditors of the controlled company (Wincor Nixdorf AG) if they make a corresponding request for this purpose to the controlling company within six months after the publication of the registration. However, this obligation under Section 303 para. 1 and 2 of the Stock Corporation Act exists only with regard to those creditors whose claims were established before the registration of the termination of a domination or a profit-and-loss transfer agreement in the commercial register had been publicly announced pursuant to Section 10 of the German Commercial Code, and only to the benefit of those creditors which, in case of insolvency proceedings, would not have a right for preferred satisfaction from an insolvency estate which is established and publicly monitored for the protection of such preferred creditors under statutory law. The controlling company can issue a surety for the claim instead of posting security, whereby Section 349 of the German Commercial Code concerning the exclusion of the defense of requiring that a complaint first be filed against the primary obligor does not apply in this situation (Section 303 para. 3 of the Stock Corporation Act).

1.8 Guarantee (Article 8 of the Agreement)

Article 8 of the Agreement contains the notice that Diebold Inc., without acceding to the Agreement, has issued a guarantee towards Wincor Nixdorf AG by separate declaration. This declaration is attached to the Report together with the final draft of the Agreement as Annex 3. The guarantee is not part of the Agreement.

-77-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

On the one hand, Diebold Inc., as the general partner of Diebold KGaA, is liable without limitation for the liabilities of Diebold KGaA (Section 278 paras. 1 and 2 of the Stock Corporation Act in conjunction with Sections 161 para. 2, 128 et seq. of the German Commercial Code) and this liability refers to all of the liabilities of Diebold KGaA and is not limited to a certain amount or to certain assets. On the other hand, the Diebold Group reserves the right to consider replacing Diebold Inc. as the general partner and installing a German limited liability company (GmbH) or a company with a different legal form instead.

For this reason and for additional protection, Diebold Inc. has granted in the guarantee an unlimited and irrevocable commitment to procure that Diebold KGaA is funded in a way that it is constantly able to fully comply with all its obligations under and in connection with the Agreement and in a timely manner. In particular, this applies to the obligation to assume losses pursuant to Section 302 of the Stock Corporation Act as amended from time to time. The contractual obligation assumed by Diebold Inc. pursuant to the two preceding sentences will only result in a payment obligation when and to the extent it is specifically foreseeable that Diebold KGaA will not be able to fully meet its obligations under or in connection with the Agreement when due. Furthermore, Diebold Inc. irrevocably and in principle without limitation guarantees to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders that Diebold KGaA will completely and timely fulfil all obligations existing towards them that arise out of or in connection with the Agreement, in particular to effect the Recurring Compensation Payment and of the Exit Compensation; this also applies to potential increases of the Recurring Compensation and the Exit Compensation that occur due to a potential proceeding pursuant to the Appraisal Proceedings Act. In this regard, the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders have, under the guarantee, a direct claim for payment against Diebold KGaA according to Section 328 para. 1 of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB). This liability of Diebold Inc. towards the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders applies only to the extent that Diebold KGaA cannot fulfil its obligations out of or in connection with the Agreement towards the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders in full and on time and that Diebold Inc. does not comply with its aforementioned funding obligation. The outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders therefore enjoy additional protection that goes beyond the statutory requirements.

-78-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The enforcement of the claims arising out of or in connection with the guarantee is ensured from a procedural perspective as Diebold Inc. has submitted itself to the jurisdiction of German courts and to the local competence of the courts in Paderborn with regard to disputes and claims arising out of or in connection with the guarantee. In addition, Diebold Inc. has recognized the enforceability of decisions of German courts which can no longer be appealed (rechtskräftig) in this context. Diebold KGaA has been appointed as the person authorized to receive documents (Zustellungsbevollmächtigter) for Diebold Inc. concerning the enforcement of claims arising out of or in connection with the guarantee.

1.9 Miscellaneous (Article 9 of the Agreement)

Article 9 para. 1 of the Agreement (severability clause) shall secure the survival of the main content of the Agreement if individual contractual provisions turn out to be completely or partially invalid, unenforceable or if there are gaps, contrary to the parties’ expectations. This is a provision typically included in domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreements. Furthermore, the corporate income tax provisions for the recognition of a tax group, especially these of the Sections 14 to 19 of the Corporation Tax Act as amended from time to time, shall be taken into account when interpreting the Agreement.

Article 9 para. 2 of the Agreement clarifies that the profit-and-loss transfer agreement is legally independent of the guarantee attached only for purposes of information and of legal transactions and arrangements concluded between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold KGaA or between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. in the past or which may be concluded in the future and does not form a legal unity pursuant to Section 139 of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB).

Pursuant to Article 9 para. 3 sentence 1 of the Agreement, amendments and supplements to the Agreement must be in writing for their effectiveness. This specifically also applies to the clause requiring written form (Article 9 para. 3 sentence 2 of the Agreement). Pursuant to Article 9 para. 3 sentence 3 of the Agreement, Section 295 of the Stock Corporation Act, which provides that company agreements may only be amended with the consent of the annual shareholders’ meeting, shall apply.

-79-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Article 9 para. 4 of the Agreement determines Paderborn as the place of performance for reciprocal obligations as the exclusive legal venue as far as legally permissible. By this provision it is ensured that the courts at the registered office of Wincor Nixdorf AG are called upon for decision on disputes in connection with the interpretation of this Agreement.

2. Payment of the Recurring Compensation and the Exit Compensation (technical processing by the banks)

Diebold KGaA assigned Deutsche Bank AG, Frankfurt am Main, Germany, as the central processor for the technical handling of the payment of the Exit Compensation under Article 5 of the Agreement. The Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders who want to make use of the offer for the Exit Compensation must instruct their depositary bank to make available their Wincor Nixdorf Shares to the central processor via the collective custody system for the purpose of receiving the Exit Compensation. Simultaneously, with (Zug um Zug) proper transfer of the Wincor Nixdorf Shares, the Exit Compensation will then be paid out. The processing of the Exit Compensation is free of charge for the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders, provided that they have a domestic securities deposit account (see Section IV.1.5.4). The Exit Compensation will be offered to all outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders. Details about the processing will be announced without undue delay after registration of the Agreement in the commercial register.

Payment of the Recurring Compensation under Article 4 of the Agreement will be processed in the same manner as dividend payments.

3. Legal effects on outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders

3.1 Legal effects

The implementation of the Agreement will affect outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders’ control and dividend rights arising from their shares.

Under the Agreement Diebold KGaA reserves the right to issue binding instructions to the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG with regard to the management of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Wincor Nixdorf AG may exclusively serve the Interests of Diebold KGaA or the Diebold Group. In accordance with the Agreement, Diebold KGaA may issue disadvantageous instructions to Wincor Nixdorf AG if these instructions serve the interest of the Diebold Group. Such disadvantageous instructions can have significant adverse effects on the financial situation and earnings position of Wincor Nixdorf AG despite the obligation of Diebold KGaA to assume the losses and may also continue to have effect after the Agreement has been terminated.

-80-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders will be affected in their control rights and possibly in their financial rights as a result of Diebold KGaA’s right of managerial control and the right to issue instructions to Wincor Nixdorf AG as agreed upon in the Agreement. Those adverse effects for the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders will, for the term of the Agreement, be compensated by the obligation to grant the Recurring Compensation Payment (see Section IV.1.4). In addition, they may accept the offer of Exit Compensation (see Section IV.1.5) and sell their Wincor Nixdorf Shares to Diebold KGaA.

With the obligation to transfer profits pursuant to article 2 of the Agreement coming into effect, i.e. from the fiscal year in which the Agreement becomes effective by registration in the commercial register of Wincor Nixdorf AG (see the explanations in Section IV.1.2 above), Wincor Nixdorf AG will not report any annual profit or, aside from any earnings resulting from the dissolution of reserves which are not subject to the transfer of profit or a balance sheet profit resulting from any profit carry forward from the time before the Agreement, any balance sheet profit. This means that from the time the obligation to transfer profit takes effect, the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders will generally not receive any dividends during the term of the Agreement. Therefore, they generally will not have the opportunity to resolve upon the appropriation of the balance sheet profit any longer.

In order to protect the interests of the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders, there is a claim against Diebold KGaA for an annual Recurring Compensation Payment under Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act. The Recurring Compensation Payment to be paid in accordance with Article 4 of the Agreement will be paid to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders without undue delay after the due date established in Article 4 para. 2 of the Agreement. The technical processing of the payment will be through the respective depositary banks just as in the case of a dividend payment (see Section IV.2).

Alternatively to receiving the Recurring Compensation Payment, outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders may accept the offer for Exit Compensation pursuant to Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act and exit the company against payment of the Exit Compensation set out in Article 5 para. 1 of the Agreement. As this constitutes a cash dividend, interest in the amount of five percentage points above the current base rate according to Section 247 of the

-81-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch, BGB) is payable starting with the expiry of the day the Agreement becomes effective. If an appraisal proceeding is commenced, the acceptance period for the Exit Compensation ends no earlier than two months after the date on which the resolution which can no longer be appealed (rechtskräftig) of the last motion by a Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder has been announced in the Federal Gazette (Bundesanzeiger). For details on the Recurring Compensation Payment and the Exit Compensation see the explanations on Articles 4 and 5 of the Agreement in Sections IV.1.4 and IV.1.5 above.

The outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders do not lose the right to the Exit Compensation as a result of the fact that they have already received payments of the Recurring Compensation. If the offer for the Exit Compensation is only accepted after Recurring Compensation has been paid, which may be the case especially if the offer for the Exit Compensation is accepted during or after conclusion of appraisal proceedings (see Section 305 para. 4 sentence 3 of the Stock Corporation Act and Article 5 para. 2 of the Agreement), payments of the Recurring Compensation which have already been received will be credited against the claim for interest on the Exit Compensation under Section 305 para. 3 sentence 3 of the Stock Corporation Act. This crediting will take place in accordance with reference periods, typically fiscal years. The outside shareholders remain entitled to the Recurring Compensation in the event it is higher than the interest for the respective reference period; if the amount of the interest on the Exit Compensation is higher in the respective reference period, the outside shareholders shall be paid the difference (interest on the Exit Compensation less the Recurring Compensation) in addition to the Recurring Compensation. The crediting of the Recurring Compensation with the interest on the Exit Compensation to be paid only occurs with regard to the Recurring Compensation which relates to the period of time after registration of the Agreement in the commercial register. Recurring Compensation which has already been received will not be credited against the payment of the Exit Compensation itself. This corresponds to the statutory provisions, taking into account the case law of the BGH (judgment dated September 16, 2002, case no. II ZR 284/01 – “Rütgers”; judgment dated June 2, 2003 case no. II ZR 85/02; judgment dated December 10, 2007, case no. II ZR 199/06).

Upon effectiveness of the Agreement, the obligation of Diebold KGaA to purchase the Wincor Nixdorf Shares of the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders in exchange for payment of the Exit Compensation set out in Article 5 para. 1 of the Agreement comes into force. As of that point in time, the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders can make use of their right to transfer

-82-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

their Wincor Nixdorf Shares to Diebold KGaA in exchange for payment of the Exit Compensation set out in the Agreement by declaration to Diebold KGaA or to their respective depositary bank. Those Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders who do not make use of their right to transfer their Wincor Nixdorf Shares to Diebold KGaA continue to be Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders and annually receive the Recurring Compensation Payment.

Immediately after registration of the Agreement the details on the exit compensation procedure will be published in the Federal Gazette (Bundesanzeiger) and will be communicated to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders via the respective depositary banks. The processing of the transfer of the shares to Diebold KGaA as a result of accepting the offer for Exit Compensation will be free of charge for the Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders, provided that they have a domestic securities deposit account (Article 5 para. 5 of the Agreement).

The obligation of Diebold KGaA to assume the shares of outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders in exchange for payment of the Exit Compensation is limited in time pursuant to Article 5 para. 2 of the Agreement. The outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders’ declaration to accept the offer for the Exit Compensation must be received within such time limit (see the explanations in Section IV.1.5.4 above on details of the time limitation of the obligation of Diebold KGaA). After expiry of the time limit set out in Article 5 para. 2 of the Agreement, the offer for the Exit Compensation can no longer be accepted.

In case the period for acceptance of the offer for Exit Compensation is extended upon appraisal proceedings pursuant to Section 305 para. 4 sentence 3 of the Stock Corporation Act, and outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders accept the offer for Exit Compensation after having received the Recurring Compensation Payments pursuant to Article 4 of the Agreement, the payments received will be credited against the claim for interest on the Exit Compensation under Section 305 para. 3 sentence 3 of the Stock Corporation Act (see earlier in this Section).

Aside from this, the entering into the Agreement has no legal effect on the shareholdings of the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders. In particular, entering into the Agreement or its registration in the commercial register does not affect the voting rights and other participation rights linked to their shares. However, pursuant to the domination agreement, Diebold KGaA may also issue disadvantageous instructions to the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG. Such disadvantageous instructions may, regardless of the

-83-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

obligation of Diebold KGaA for loss assumption, have significant adverse effects on the financial situation and results of operation of Wincor Nixdorf AG, which may also continue to have an effect after any termination of the domination agreement.

The stock exchange listing of the Wincor Nixdorf Shares will not be affected by the registration of the Agreement to the commercial register. However, it cannot be excluded that a large portion of the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders will accept the offer for Exit Compensation and that the number of the Wincor Nixdorf Shares held in free float will decrease further. This can have the consequence that the resulting reduction of the liquidity of Wincor Nixdorf Shares leads to greater fluctuations in the price of the Wincor Nixdorf stock than in the past.

The number of the Wincor Nixdorf Shares held in free float and, accordingly, the liquidity of the Wincor Nixdorf Share will decrease to the extent the offer for the Exit Compensation under the Agreement is accepted. As a result, Wincor Nixdorf AG might no longer fulfil the respective criteria for remaining in stock exchange indices currently including the Wincor Nixdorf Shares. A removal from a stock exchange index or a decrease of the trading volume of the Wincor Nixdorf Share can have the consequence, among others, that institutional investors which reflect the relevant index in their portfolio or invest only in shares with a certain minimum liquidity will dispose of Wincor Nixdorf Shares and refrain from any future purchases of Wincor Nixdorf Shares. An increased offer of Wincor Nixdorf Shares combined with a lower demand for Wincor Nixdorf Shares can adversely influence the stock exchange price for the Wincor Nixdorf Shares.

It is possible, that Diebold KGaA will decide on a squeeze-out of the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG after settlement of the domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement or another restructuring measure, under which a potential underlying cash compensation may possibly be higher but also less than the Exit Compensation offered under this Agreement.

The Parties will implement the Agreement and perform their obligations under the Agreement in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, including, to the extent applicable, the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the rules and regulations promulgated by the SEC thereunder.

-84-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

3.2 Protection of outside shareholders

Protection of the interests of the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders in connection with entering into the Agreement is, as described below, secured by granting a Recurring Compensation and an Exit Compensation, the adequateness of which is examined by the court appointed auditor (see Section IV.3.2.2). Should outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders be of the opinion that the Recurring Compensation Payment and/or the Exit Compensation set out in the Agreement are not adequate, they can have the adequateness examined in appraisal proceedings.

3.2.1 Recurring Compensation and Exit Compensation

The statutory provisions on the grant of Recurring Compensation and on Exit Compensation and their implementation in the Agreement in the form of the Recurring Compensation Payment and the Exit Compensation all take account of the interests of the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders.

With respect to the restriction of their control rights caused by the right of managerial control and the right to issue instructions coming into effect pursuant to Article 1 of the Agreement and the obligation of Wincor Nixdorf AG to transfer profit pursuant to Article 2 of the Agreement, the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders shall receive full economic compensation for the loss of their dividend claims by means of the obligation of Diebold KGaA to grant an annual Recurring Compensation Payment pursuant to Article 4 paras. 1 and 2 of the Agreement in conjunction with Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act.

Based on the Valuation Report by PwC, the parties agreed on a fixed annual Recurring Compensation Payment of €3.17 gross. German corporate income tax plus German solidarity surcharge or any other levied taxes that are replacing or amending these taxes or are levied by way of withholding are to be deducted at the rate applicable in the relevant fiscal year, whereby this deduction is to affect only any portion of the Gross Compensation Amount resulting from profits which are subject to German corporate income tax.

According to the conditions as of the date of signing of this Report, from the Gross Compensation Amount of €3.17 per Wincor Nixdorf Share, currently, 15% corporate income tax plus 5.5% solidarity surcharge shall be deducted, i.e. €0.32 per Wincor Nixdorf Share in total. According to the conditions as of the date of signing of this Report, this results in a Compensation Payment in the amount of €2.85 per Wincor Nixdorf Share for each full fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG (regarding the legal basis of the Recurring Compensation Payment, see Section IV.1.4.1(i) and regarding the calculation of the Recurring Compensation Payment, see Section IV.1.4.2(i)).

-85-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Alternatively, after the Agreement has been registered, outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders may transfer their Wincor Nixdorf Shares to Diebold KGaA in exchange for payment of an adequate Exit Compensation, i.e. to exercise the offer of Diebold KGaA for Exit Compensation pursuant to Article 5 para. 1 of the Agreement in conjunction with Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act. For determination of the Exit Compensation in an amount of €53.34 per Wincor Nixdorf Share set out in Article 5 para. 1 of the Agreement, the circumstances with regards to Wincor Nixdorf AG existing at the time of adoption of the relevant resolution at the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG which shall take place on September 26, 2016 have been taken into account (please see the detailed explanation and reasoning regarding the adequateness of the Exit Compensation in Section V.3).

In the event the base interest rate changes from currently 0.7% until September 26, 2016, the relevant determinative date, the amount of both the Recurring Compensation and the adequate Exit Compensation would be affected. The relevant effects are described under Section IV.1.4.2(iii) and Section IV.1.5.2 and in the Valuation Report (Annex 5) under no. 395 et seqq. (Exit Compensation) and 400 et seqq. (Compensation Payment), respectively.

3.2.2 Contract audit by an expert auditor

In response to the joint application of the management board and the management of the Parties, the District Court (Landgericht) Dortmund, in accordance with Section 293c para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act, selected and appointed ADKL as expert auditor within the meaning of Section 293b para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act by order dated June 1, 2016. This court order is attached to the Report as Annex 4. ADKL examines the Agreement and, in particular, the adequateness of the annual Recurring Compensation Payment as well as the Exit Compensation and prepares a separate Audit Report pursuant to Section 293e of the Stock Corporation Act. From the date on which the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG, which – as the shareholders’ meeting of Diebold KGaA – shall take place on September 26, 2016, is convened, this Audit Report will be available together with the other documents set forth in Section 293f para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act on the website of Wincor Nixdorf AG at http://www.wincor-nixdorf.com/ under Investor Relations/Annual General Meeting and on the

-86-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

website of Diebold KGaA at http://www.dieboldnixdorf.com under Company/Investor Relations. The information required by Sec. 293f para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act will also be available for display by the shareholders at the offices of Wincor Nixdorf AG from the date on which the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG is convened until its end and will also be available during the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG on September 26, 2016. A copy of these documents will be sent to any Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder free of charge without undue delay upon request. Reference is made to the invitation for the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG that will resolve upon the approval of the Agreement with regard to the details of the availability and request of the copies of this and the other documents.

3.2.3 Appraisal proceedings

Should outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders be of the opinion that the amount of the annual Recurring Compensation Payment set out pursuant to Article 4 para. 2 of the Agreement is too low, they can have the adequateness of the Recurring Compensation Payment examined by a court in appraisal proceedings pursuant to Section 304 para. 3 sentence 3 of the Stock Corporation Act in conjunction with Section 1 no. 1 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act after the Agreement takes effect. The right to initiate appraisal proceedings does not depend on having declared an objection to the minutes recorded by the officiating notary against the resolution of the general shareholders’ meeting on the Agreement during the general shareholders’ meeting. The court examination of the Recurring Compensation Payment in appraisal proceedings under Section 304 para. 3 sentence 3 of the Stock Corporation Act in conjunction with Section 1 no. 1 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act can be requested within three months from the date on which the registration of the existence of the Agreement in the commercial register of Wincor Nixdorf AG has been publicly announced pursuant to Section 10 of the German Commercial Code. The request must be supported with reasons in accordance with Section 4 para. 2 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act within the above stated deadline of three months. If a higher annual Recurring Compensation Payment is set forth by the court having jurisdiction in such appraisal proceedings by an order which can no longer be appealed (rechtskräftig), all outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders can assert a claim against Diebold KGaA for the Recurring Compensation Payment as increased by the court (Section 13 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act). In this case, Diebold KGaA may terminate the Agreement within two months, after which the court decision can no longer be appealed without having to comply with a

-87-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

notice period (Section 304 para. 4 of the Stock Corporation Act). If appraisal proceedings are ended by a settlement, the rights of all outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders are protected by the fact that such an end of proceedings under Section 11 para. 2 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act is only possible with the consent of the joint representative of the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders and any agreement about an increased Recurring Compensation Payment agreed in order to end the proceedings applies for the benefit of all outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders regardless of whether they were involved in the appraisal proceedings themselves.

Should outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders be of the view that the Exit Compensation set out in Article 5 para. 1 of the Agreement is too low, they can also have the adequateness of the Exit Compensation examined by a court in appraisal proceedings pursuant to Section 305 para. 5 sentence 2 of the Stock Corporation Act in conjunction with Section 1 no. 1 of the Appraisal Proceedings Act. The discussion in the above paragraph concerning the Recurring Compensation Payment applies accordingly with regard to the deadline for submitting the request, the submission of reasons for the request, the effect of the court decision in such appraisal proceedings, a termination right of Diebold KGaA following a court decision regarding the Exit Compensation and the conclusion of such proceedings by way of court settlement.

4. Tax effects on outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders

4.1 Preliminary remarks

The following paragraphs contain a brief summary of certain important German tax principles which can be relevant in connection with entering into the Agreement for the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders who are subject to unlimited tax liability in Germany.

Tax consequences for non-tax resident Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders who are not subject to unlimited tax liability in Germany are not addressed below. Their respective treatment depends, inter alia, on special provisions of German tax law, the tax law of the country in which the respective shareholder is tax resident in as well as on provisions in any applicable treaty for the avoidance of double taxation (double taxation treaty).

-88-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The description relates in principle only to German taxes, in particular, corporate income tax, income tax, capital gains tax and trade tax as well as the solidarity surcharge, whereas church tax is not included and the explanation of the aforementioned taxes is limited to certain aspects. For example, the description does not address the specific aspects of so-called unvested shares (sperrfristbehaftete Anteile) which were acquired as consideration for a tax benefited contribution under the German Reorganisation Tax Act (Umwandlungssteuergesetz – UmwStG) and does not deal with special provisions for certain companies in the financial and insurance industries as well. The description is based on the current law as applied by the tax authorities and the tax courts at the time of this Report. The governing law as well as the tax treatment may change, in some cases even with retroactive effect.

No guarantee of completeness and accuracy of this description can be given. The explanations within this Report do not replace the need for individual tax advice. Shareholders are therefore advised to consult with their tax advisors. Only a tax advisor is in the position to adequately assess the particular tax situation of the individual shareholder.

4.2 Taxation of Recurring Compensation Payments at the level of shareholders

The guaranteed Recurring Compensation Payment to be paid pursuant to Article 4 para. 1 of the Agreement should be subject to the general rules on taxation of dividends at the level of the receiving shareholders.

4.2.1 Shares held as private assets

At the time of payment, Capital gains tax in the amount of 25% plus the solidarity surcharge of 5.5% on the amount of the capital gains tax (tax deduction including solidarity surcharge in total amounts to 26.375%) must be deducted from the Recurring Compensation Payment. The capital gains tax as well as the solidarity surcharge thereon are generally withheld and passed on without regard to which extent the payment is actually subject to taxation at the level of the shareholders.

Shareholders may apply to have the Recurring Compensation Payments assessed in accordance with the general income tax rules rather than the flat tax if this results in a lower tax burden for the shareholder (most-favorable-tax-treatment test (Günstigerprüfung)). In this case the investment income less the saver’s allowance (Sparer-Pauschbetrag) of €801.00 (respectively €1,602.00 in the case of jointly filing spouses and registered partners) is relevant for the taxation and deduction of the actual income-related expenses is excluded. The capital gains tax initially withheld is credited against the levied income.

-89-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

4.2.2 Shares held as business assets

The Recurring Compensation Payment is subject to capital gains tax in the amount of 25% plus the solidarity surcharge of 5.5% on the amount of the capital gains tax (thus, tax deduction amounts to 26.375% in total). The withheld tax will be credited against the respective shareholder’s income tax or corporate income tax liability. Under certain conditions, withheld capital gains tax can be reimbursed to the extent it exceeds the shareholders’ personal tax obligation. This applies accordingly to the solidarity surcharge.

Apart from that, in case of shares held as business assets, the taxation depends on whether the shareholder is a corporation, an individual business person or a partnership (co-entrepreneurship):

(i) Corporations

Recurring Compensation Payments received by corporations are generally subject to corporate income tax, unless the shareholder held at least 10% of the share capital at the beginning of the respective calendar year. In this case, the Recurring Compensation Payment is generally exempt from corporate income tax. However, 5% of this tax-exempt income is treated as a non-deductible business expense and, as such, is subject to corporate income tax (plus solidarity surcharge thereon). Correspondingly, business expenses which have actually been incurred in connection with the Recurring Compensation Payments can generally be fully deducted (subject to other limitations on deductibility). The Recurring Compensation Payments are fully subject to trade tax (Gewerbesteuer) unless the shareholder holds a participation of at least 15% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG (intercompany participation (Schachtelbeteiligung)) at the beginning of the relevant tax period. In the latter case, the exemption of 95% of the Recurring Compensation Payments from corporate income tax applies accordingly for purposes of trade tax.

-90-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(ii) Individuals (Sole Proprietors)

In the case of individuals (sole proprietors (natürliche Personen)), 60% of the Recurring Compensation Payment is subject to taxation (so-called partial-income method (Teileinkünfteverfahren)). Accordingly, expenses economically connected with the Recurring Compensation Payment are only deductible in an amount of 60% (subject to other limitations on deductibility). If the shares belong to the assets of a permanent business establishment located in Germany, the Recurring Compensation Payment is fully subject to trade tax if the shareholder is subject to trade tax and does not hold a participation of at least 15% of the share capital of the company at the beginning of the relevant fiscal year. However, the trade tax can be fully or partially credited against the shareholder’s income tax by means of a flat sum procedure.

(iii) Partnerships

If the shares are held by a partnership (co-entrepreneurship), the income tax or corporate income tax is only incurred at the level of each partner. In case of partners subject to corporate income tax who participate in the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG in the amount of at least 10% at the beginning of the relevant tax period proportionately through the partnership or proportionately through the partnership and directly, 95% of the Recurring Compensation Payment is tax-exempt and the remainder is subject to taxation (see Section (i) above). In case the partner is instead subject to income tax, 60% of the Recurring Compensation Payment is subject to taxation (see Section (ii) above). With regards to deductibility of business expenses the information in Section (i) and (ii) above applies accordingly to partners subject to corporate income tax. The Recurring Compensation Payment is fully subject to trade tax at the level of the partnership if it is subject to trade tax and does not hold a participation of at least 15% of the share capital of the company at the beginning of the relevant fiscal year.

4.3 Taxation of Exit Compensation at the level of shareholders

Pursuant to Article 5 para. 1 of the Agreement, Diebold KGaA undertakes, towards shareholders who want dispose of their Wincor Nixdorf Shares in connection with the conclusion of the Agreement with Wincor Nixdorf AG, to purchase their shares in exchange for an adequate Exit Compensation in the amount of €53.34 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share. Any capital gain resulting from the consequent transfer of Wincor Nixdorf Shares against the abovementioned Exit Compensation should be subject to the general rules on taxation of gains from the disposal of shares in a corporation at the level of the respective shareholders. A capital gain is realized if the Exit Compensation minus any costs of sale exceeds the acquisition costs for tax purposes or the book value for tax purposes for the relevant shares at the level of the respective shareholder. If the Exit Compensation minus any costs of sale is less than the acquisition costs or the book value of the shares at the level of the shareholder, a capital loss is incurred.

-91-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

If the shares are held in custody or administered by a domestic bank or financial service institute (including the domestic branches of foreign banks and financial service institutes), a domestic securities trading company or a domestic securities trading bank, or if such office sells the shares and pays out or credits the capital gains for the account of the shareholder (each a “Paying Agent”), the capital gains tax of 25% plus 5.5% solidarity surcharge thereon will be withheld (thus, tax deduction in total amounts to 26.375%) from capital gains subject to taxation in principle. However, the Domestic Paying Agent will usually refrain from withholding the capital gains tax for instance if (i) the shareholder is a corporation, association or estate with its tax domicile in Germany, or (ii) the shares form part of the shareholder’s domestic business assets and the shareholder informs the Domestic Paying Agent of this on the officially prescribed form, and if certain additional prerequisites are met.

No capital gains tax will be due with regard to the Exit Compensation if the shares are held in private assets and were acquired before January 1, 2009. Deduction of capital gains tax also does not apply to the Exit Compensation for shares held as business assets by corporations with unlimited tax liability. The same applies under certain circumstances to shares held by natural persons or by partnerships as business assets.

A deduction of capital gains tax and solidarity surcharge has a settling effect (abgeltende Wirkung) with regard to shares held as private assets. On the contrary, a deduction of taxes has neither a settling effect (abgeltende Wirkung) with regards to shares held as private assets if the shareholder or – in case of a gratuitous acquisition – its legal predecessor directly or indirectly held at least 1% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG during the last five years prior to the disposal nor with regards to shares held as business assets. In these cases, withheld taxes will be credited against the disposing shareholder’s income or corporate income tax and solidarity surcharge and any exceeding amount will be reimbursed.

-92-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

4.3.1 Shares held as private assets

Taxation on the Exit Compensation depends on whether the shareholders have acquired the shares before January 1, 2009 or after December 31, 2008:

(i) Shares acquired before January 1, 2009

Capital gains from shares which were acquired before January 1, 2009 and which were held in private assets remain tax-free also with regard to any compensation.

However, capital gains from the Exit Compensation in favor of a shareholder who, or – in case of acquisition of title free of charge – whose predecessor, at any point in time during five years prior to the acquisition of the shares by Diebold KGaA pursuant to Article 5 para. 1 of the Agreement, directly or indirectly held a participation of at least 1% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG are subject to the so-called partial income method (Teileinkünfteverfahren), i.e. 60% of these capital gains are subject to taxation. Accordingly, only 60% of expenses economically connected to the Exit Compensation and of capital losses may be deducted in this case.

(ii) Shares acquired after December 31, 2008

Capital gains from shares acquired after December 31, 2008 are, regardless of the holding period, generally subject to taxation of 25% plus 5.5% solidarity surcharge thereon (thus, tax deduction in total amounts to 26.375%). Basically, the shareholder’s income tax liability is compensated with the withholding of the capital gains tax. Respective capital losses may only be offset against gains from the disposal of shares during the current or a later year.

Capital gains tax is deducted from capital gains resulting from the compensation for shares which have been acquired after December 31, 2008, provided that a domestic paying agent is involved. Deduction of capital gains tax generally has a settling effect (abgeltende Wirkung), i.e. insofar as the shareholder’s tax liability is deemed settled and the capital gain does not need to be stated in the shareholder’s annual tax declarations. Under certain circumstances (for example, in case of the existence of a non-assessment certificate (Nichtveranlagungsbescheinigung) of the tax authorities or in case of an exemption order (Freistellungsauftrag) in a sufficient volume) the Exit Compensation may be paid out to shareholders without deducting capital gains tax and the solidarity surcharge. If the capital gains tax is not deducted in certain cases (for example, in case of the absence of a domestic paying agent), the shareholder must state the capital gain in his or her annual tax returns. However, in these cases, the capital gain will not be assessed at the shareholder’s personal income tax rate but at the flat tax rate on capital income.

-93-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Upon request of the shareholder, the capital gain resulting from the Exit Compensation can be subject to the income tax rate instead of the taxation at the flat capital gains tax if this reduces the tax burden on the respective shareholder. In this case, the capital gains tax initially withheld will be credited against the levied income tax. When determining the capital income only a saver’s allowance of €801.00 (or €1,602.00 in the case of filing jointly spouses and registered partners) may be deducted as income-related expenses. Deduction of the actual income-related expenses is excluded.

If the shareholder or the legal predecessor of the shareholder, in the event that the shareholder acquired the Wincor Nixdorf Shares gratuitously, directly or indirectly held a participation of at least 1% of the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG at any point in time during the last five years, 60% of the capital gain is subject to taxation. The withheld capital gains tax and the solidarity surcharge will be credited against the shareholder’s tax liability and any exceeding amount will be reimbursed. In these cases, shareholders may deduct only 60% of any capital losses and expenses in connection with the disposal.

4.3.2 Shares held as business assets

If shares are held as business assets, the taxation of the capital gains resulting from the disposal depends on whether the shareholder is a corporation, an individual (sole proprietor) or a partnership (co-entrepreneurship):

(i) Corporations

With regard to corporations, profits from the disposal of shares are generally exempt from corporate income tax and trade tax. However, 5% of the capital gains are deemed to be expenses which cannot be deducted as business expenses for tax purposes so that they are subject to corporate income tax (plus the solidarity surcharge thereon) and trade tax. Capital losses and other reductions in the profit in connection to the disposed shares cannot be taken into account for tax purposes.

-94-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(ii) Individuals (Sole Proprietor)

If the shares are held by an individual sole proprietor, 60% of the capital gains are subject to taxation at the shareholder’s personal income tax rate plus 5.5% solidarity surcharge thereon. Accordingly, only 60% of the business expenses related to the capital gains as well as only 60% of any capital losses can be taken into account for tax purposes. If the shares belong to the assets of a permanent business establishment located in Germany, 60% of the capital gains are subject to trade tax if the individual business person is subject to trade tax. However, the trade tax is completely or partially credited against the income tax of the investor.

(iii) Partnerships

If the shares are held by a partnership (co-entrepreneur), the taxation depends on whether its partners are subject to income or corporate income tax. With regard to partners subject to corporate income tax, 95% of the capital gains from the disposal of shares is generally tax-exempt (see Section (i) above). With regard to partners subject to income tax, 60% of the capital gains from the disposal of shares is subject to taxation (see Section (ii) above). In addition, in case of an allocation to a permanent business establishment located in Germany, 60% of the capital gains from the disposal of shares is subject to trade tax at the level of the partnership if natural persons participate in the partnership, and 5% of the capital gains is subject to trade tax at the level of the partnership if corporations participate in the partnership. However, to the extent that individuals participate in the partnership, the trade tax is completely or partially credited against their income tax by way of a flat rate procedure. With regard to deductibility of business expenses and capital losses, the information on partners subject to corporate income tax in Section (i) and the information on partners subject to income tax in Section (ii) above applies accordingly.

5. Tax effects on Wincor Nixdorf AG

If all other preconditions for a consolidated tax group for purposes of corporate income tax and trade tax are fulfilled, the Agreement will have the effect that earnings of Wincor Nixdorf AG are allocated to Diebold KGaA for corporate income and trade tax purposes and are subject to taxation at Diebold KGaA.

-95-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

20/17 of the recurring compensation payments to outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders are subject to corporate income tax at the level of Wincor Nixdorf AG (Section 16 of the Corporation Tax Act).

The consolidated tax group comes into existence starting with the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG, at the beginning of which the obligation to transfer profit pursuant to Article 2 of the Agreement becomes effective, i.e. presumably with the fiscal year beginning as of October 1, 2016, provided that the Agreement has been registered in the commercial register by the end of said fiscal year pursuant to Article 7 para. 2 of the Agreement. Loss carry forwards existing at the beginning of the consolidated tax group remain in place but cannot be used for tax purposes for the duration of the consolidated tax group.

As a result of the consolidation for tax purposes, Wincor Nixdorf AG is liable pursuant to Section 73 of the German General Tax Code (Abgabenordnung) for those taxes of the parent company of the consolidated tax group for which the consolidated tax group is relevant. Claims for reimbursement of tax credits and actual taxes are treated alike in this regard.

6. Cost of the domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement

The preparation and proposed conclusion of the Agreement are associated with one-off expenses. Such costs incurred at Wincor Nixdorf AG, in particular, by mandating the Valuation Expert (see Section I.), the issuance of the Audit Report by the court appointed Contract Auditor ADKL (see Section IV.3.2.2), as well as by obtaining legal advice. Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf AG each bear one half of the costs for the preparation of the valuation report on the enterprise value prepared by the Valuation Expert as well as the costs for the preparation of the report by the Contract Auditor. All other costs incurred by the parties, including costs of external advisers, are borne by the respective party alone. External costs to be borne by Wincor Nixdorf AG in a range of approximately €1.7 million are expected overall.

V. TYPE AND AMOUNT OF THE RECURRING COMPENSATION AND THE EXIT COMPENSATION PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 304 AND 305 OF THE STOCK CORPORATION ACT

1. Overview

Pursuant to Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act, a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement must contain adequate Recurring Compensation for the outside shareholders by means of a recurring cash payment related to the shares in the share capital. The type of Recurring Compensation and reasons for choosing a fixed Recurring Compensation are described in Section IV.1.4.1.

-96-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

At least the annual payment of that amount must be promised as recurring compensation under Section 304 para. 1 sentence 1 and para. 2 sentence 1 of the Stock Corporation Act, which could most likely be distributed to the individual shareholder as an average share in the profit according to the earnings position of the company to date and its future prospects for earnings, taking into account reasonable depreciation and adjustments in value but without establishing other profit reserves.

According to Section 305 para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act, a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement must also contain the obligation of the controlling company to purchase the shares of an outside shareholder upon request in exchange for adequate exit compensation determined in the agreement. The adequate exit compensation must take into account the circumstances of the company at the time of adopting the resolution at the general shareholders’ meeting about the agreement in accordance with Section 305 para. 3 sentence 2 of the Stock Corporation Act. According to prevailing opinion, this applies accordingly for the Recurring Compensation Payment pursuant to Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act. According to the order of the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) dated April 27, 1999 (case no. BvR 1613/94), an existing stock exchange price cannot be ignored when setting the amount of the Exit Compensation under Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act. The stock exchange price generally represents the lowest amount of the exit compensation to be paid to the shareholder.

The determinative date for the valuation of the Recurring Compensation and the Exit Compensation is the scheduled date of the annual general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG which will vote on the Agreement, i.e. September 26, 2016.

The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA assigned PwC to submit a Valuation Report on the company value of Wincor Nixdorf AG as well as on the amount of the adequate Recurring Compensation Payment for purposes of Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act and the Exit Compensation for purposes of Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act on the scheduled day of the general shareholders’ meeting, i.e. September 26, 2016.

-97-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Between May 2016 and August 2016, PwC performed the necessary steps to prepare the Valuation Report. On August 16, 2016, PwC submitted its expert opinion on the estimation of the enterprise value of Wincor Nixdorf AG as well as of the adequate Exit Compensation (Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act) and of the adequate Recurring Compensation Payment (Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act) as of September 26, 2016, i.e. the date of the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG voting on the Agreement.

PwC, in its function as neutral expert within the meaning of IDW S 1, concludes in its Valuation Report that the objectified enterprise value within the meaning of IDW S 1 of Wincor Nixdorf AG as of September 26, 2016 is €1,591 million (rounded). This corresponds to an amount of €53.34 for each outstanding Wincor Nixdorf Share given 29,816,211 outstanding Wincor Nixdorf Shares (excluding Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares).

In the event the base interest rate changes until September 26, 2016 to (i) 0.6%, (ii) 0.5% or (iii) 0.8% (on this possibility see Section IV.1.4.2(iii)), the objectified enterprise value within the meaning of IDW S1 as of 2008 of Wincor Nixdorf AG as of September 26, 2016 would amount to (i) €1,615 million, (ii) €1,640 million or (iii) €1,567 million, respectively. Further details on the enterprise value per share at a base interest rate of 0.6%, 0,5% or 0,8% can also be found in the Valuation Report (Annex 5) under no. 399.

PwC also concludes that the relevant average stock exchange price is €46.79 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share. This is determined on the basis of a volume weighted average stock exchange price for Wincor Nixdorf Shares determined by BaFin for the three month period prior to the announcement by Diebold Inc. on April 8, 2016 of the intent to bring about the signing of a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold KGaA (see Section V.3). Since the enterprise value for each Wincor Nixdorf Share, determined using the discounted earnings method, is above the relevant stock exchange price, PwC based the determination of the Exit Compensation on the enterprise value. This results, according to the Valuation Report of PwC, in an adequate Exit Compensation for the purpose of Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act of €53.34 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share. The adequate Recurring Compensation for the purpose of Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act, determined using the discounted earnings method, results, according to the valuations of PwC, in a gross amount of €3.17 (net €2.85) for each Wincor Nixdorf Share.

-98-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The complete version of the Valuation Report of PwC on the determination of the adequate Exit Compensation (Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act) and the adequate Recurring Compensation (Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act) dated August 16, 2016 is attached as Annex 5 to this Report and, thus, constitutes an integral part of this Report.

The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA have completely incorporated the statements by PwC in the referenced Valuation Report regarding the enterprise value of Wincor Nixdorf AG, regarding the adequate Recurring Compensation and regarding the adequate Exit Compensation as their own and include it in the substance of this Report. In their own view, the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA consider – subject to a change of the base interest rate – the Exit Compensation for purposes of Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act in the amount of €53.34 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share as well as the Recurring Compensation for purposes of Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act in the gross amount of €3.17 (net €2.85) for each Wincor Nixdorf Share to be adequate.

The Valuation Report by PwC – as well as this Report – will be available at the website of Wincor Nixdorf AG at http://www.wincor-nixdorf.com/ under Investor Relations/Annual General Meeting, together with the other documents required pursuant to Section 293f para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act starting on the date on which the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG, which will resolve on the approval of the Agreement, is convened. The documents will also be available for display for the shareholders in the offices of Wincor Nixdorf AG from the date on which the general shareholders’ meeting is convened until it is closed and will also be available during the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG on September 26, 2016. A copy of these documents will be sent to any shareholder free of charge without undue delay upon request. Reference is made to the invitation for the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG that will resolve upon the approval of the Agreement with regard to the details of the availability and request of the copies of these and other documents. The documents will also be available at the website of Diebold KGaA at http://www.dieboldnixdorf.com under Company/Investor Relations.

-99-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA expressly point out for purposes of avoiding the risk of liabilities under foreign legal systems that the planning of Wincor Nixdorf AG constituting the basis of the enterprise valuation was prepared to the best of their knowledge but that neither Wincor Nixdorf AG, nor a company of the Diebold Group can assume any liability for their future occurrence.

2. Determination and setting of the amount of the adequate Recurring Compensation Payment pursuant to Section 304 of the Stock Corporation Act

Pursuant to Article 4 para. 1 of the Agreement, Diebold KGaA grants to the outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders a fixed annual Recurring Compensation Payment for the term of the Agreement as of its effective date.

The annual Recurring Compensation Payment amounts to €3.17 before taxes and a net amount of €2.85 per Wincor Nixdorf Share.

The reasons why the parties have agreed on a fixed Recurring Compensation Payment were described in Section IV.1.4.1(ii). The Parties have agreed on a gross amount in accordance with the case law of the BGH (judgement dated July 21, 2003, case no. II ZB 17/01 – “Ytong”). Reference is made on this point to the explanation in Section IV.1.4.2(ii).

The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA have mutually agreed on the amount of the Recurring Compensation Payment, based on the results of the Valuation Report of PwC dated August 16, 2016, in which PwC comes to the conclusion that the adequate Recurring Compensation amounts to €3.17 before taxes (net amount is €2.85) per Wincor Nixdorf Share.

For the effects of a possible change in the underlying base interest rate until the date of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled for September 26, 2016 regarding the calculation of the adequate Recurring Compensation, reference is made to the explanations above in Section IV.1.4.2(iii).

-100-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

3. Determination and setting of the amount of the adequate Exit Compensation pursuant to Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act

Pursuant to Article 5 of the Agreement, Diebold KGaA undertakes upon demand of each outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder to purchase such shareholder’s Wincor Nixdorf Shares in exchange for cash compensation (Section 305 para. 2 No. 3 of the Stock Corporation Act). Each outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder willing to make use of the offer for Exit Compensation receives Exit Compensation for each Wincor Nixdorf Share in the amount of €53.34. The main reasons for agreeing on a cash compensation as the form of Exit Compensation are described in Section IV.1.5.1.

The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the management of Diebold KGaA have agreed to determine the amount of the Exit Compensation based on the results of the Valuation Report of PwC of August 16, 2016. In this Valuation Report, PwC has determined an amount of €53.34 per Wincor Nixdorf Share as adequate Exit Compensation within the meaning of Section 305 of the Stock Corporation Act.

The enterprise value of Wincor Nixdorf AG determined by PwC in their Valuation Report in accordance with the discounted earnings method pursuant to IDW S 1 as of September 26, 2016 is €1,591 million (rounded). This corresponds to a value of €53.34 per Wincor Nixdorf Share.

When determining the Exit Compensation, PwC and the Parties took further into account the stock exchange price for the Wincor Nixdorf Shares. According to the case law of the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) of April 27, 1999, case no. BvR 1613/94, the stock exchange price generally represents the lowest amount for determining the amount of the exit compensation to be offered to the outside shareholders. The BGH (judgement dated March 12, 2001 – case no. II ZB 15/00) specified the requirements of the German Federal Constitutional Court (Bundesverfassungsgericht) with regard to the relevance of the stock exchange price for determining the adequate exit compensation. In its judgement of July 19, 2010 (case no. ZB II 18/09 – “Stollwerck”) the BGH established additional requirements in this respect and stated in further detail that the relevant stock exchange price must be determined on the basis of a volume weighted average stock exchange price during a three month reference period prior to the announcement of a structural measure.

-101-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Diebold Inc. and Diebold KGaA announced their intent to enter into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold KGaA by way of a press release on April 8, 2016. The volume weighted average stock exchange price of Wincor Nixdorf Shares determined by BaFin for the three month period prior to the publication of the press release on April 8, 2016 is €46.79. As this value of the volume weighted average stock exchange price falls below the above-mentioned enterprise value per share determined in accordance with the discounted earnings method, the enterprise value per share of €53.34 assuming a base interest rate of 0.7% (see further Section IV.1.5.2) was relevant for the determination of the Exit Compensation in the present case.

The volume weighted average stock exchange price does not have to be adjusted and extrapolated to the date of the general shareholders’ meeting. According to the Stollwerck decision of the BGH, such adjustment only has to occur if a longer period of time has passed between the public announcement of the structural measure and the date of the general shareholders’ meeting and if the development of the stock exchange prices shows that an adjustment is appropriate. An adjustment of the value weighted three months average stock exchange price in the present case, however, is not necessary because a period of less than six months lies between the announcement of the intent to enter into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement (April 8, 2016) and the date of the general shareholders’ meeting (September 26, 2016) at which the Agreement will be presented for approval. This does not constitute a longer period of time under the Stollwerck decision.

VI. CONTRACT AUDIT

ADKL has prepared an Audit Report, which, together with the documents set forth in Section 293f para. 1 of the Stock Corporation Act, will be available on the website of Wincor Nixdorf AG at http://www.wincor-nixdorf.com/ under Investor Relations/Annual General Meeting as of the date on which the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG is convened. In addition, the Audit Report and the above mentioned documents will be available at the premises of Wincor Nixdorf AG for inspection by outside Wincor Nixdorf Shareholders and will also be available during the general shareholders’ meeting. A copy of these documents will be sent to any Wincor Nixdorf Shareholder free of charge without undue delay upon request (see Section IV.3.2.2). The documents will also be available at the website of Diebold KGaA at http://www.dieboldnixdorf.com under Company/Investor Relations.

-102-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

IN GEGENSEITIGEM EINVERSTÄNDNIS ZUM GEMEINSAMEN BERICHT ÜBER DEN BEHERRSCHUNGS- UND GEWINNABFÜHRUNGSVERTRAG:

Im Namen der Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA:

Ort:
Datum:	August 2016

Christopher A. Chapman

als Finanzvorstand (CFO) der Diebold, Incorporated in ihrer Eigenschaft als persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin der Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA

S-1

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

IN GEGENSEITIGEM EINVERSTÄNDNIS ZUM GEMEINSAMEN BERICHT ÜBER DEN BEHERRSCHUNGS- UND GEWINNABFÜHRUNGSVERTRAG:

Im Namen der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft:

Ort:	Paderborn
Datum:	2016

Eckard Heidloff	Dr. Jürgen Wunram
Vorsitzender des Vorstands der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft	Mitglied des Vorstands und stellvertretender Vorsitzender des Vorstands der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft
Olaf Heyden	Dr. Ulrich Näher
Mitglied des Vorstands der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft	Mitglied des Vorstands der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft

S-2

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Annex 1: List of shareholdings of the Wincor Nixdorf Group as of December 31, 2015 pursuant to Section 313 para. 2 of the German Commercial Code

Company Name	Registered Office	Percent of ownership interest/voting securities owned by Wincor Nixdorf Group
WINCOR NIXDORF International GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Banking Consulting GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Business Administration Center GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Customer Care GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Dienstleistungs GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Facility GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Facility Services GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Global IT Operations GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Grundstücksverwaltung Ilmenau GmbH & Co. KG	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Logistics GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Lottery Solutions GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Manufacturing GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Portavis GmbH	Hamburg, Germany		68	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Real Estate GmbH & Co. KG	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Retail Consulting GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Retail Services GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Security GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Services GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Technology GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
Aevi International GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
Bankberatung Organisations- und IT-Beratung für Banken AG	Wedemark, Germany		92,04	%
IP Management GmbH	Paderborn, Germany		100	%
Prosystems IT GmbH	Bonn, Germany		100	%

-1-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Company Name	Registered Office	Percent of ownership interest/voting securities owned by Wincor Nixdorf Group
Wincor Nixdorf N.V.	Zaventem, Belgium		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf A/S	Ballerup, Denmark		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Oy	Espoo, Finland		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf SAS	Vélizy-Villacoublay, France		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Information Systems S.A.	Kifissia/Athens, Greece		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Banking Services Ltd.	Bracknell/Berkshire, Great Britain		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Ltd.	Bracknell/Berkshire, Great Britain		100	%
Aevi UK Limited	Bracknell/Berkshire, Great Britain		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Ltd.	Dublin, Ireland		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf S.r.l.	Basiglio/Milan, Italy		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Finance Malta Holding Limited	St. Julians, Malta		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Finance Malta Limited	St. Julians, Malta		100	%
SecurCash B.V.	Rotterdam, The Netherlands		100	%
SecurCash Nederland B.V.	Rotterdam, The Netherlands		100	%
SecurCash Geldverwerking B.V.	Rotterdam, The Netherlands		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf B.V.	Delft, The Netherlands		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Software CV	Utrecht, The Netherlands		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Software Partner B.V.	Utrecht, The Netherlands		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF Global Solutions B.V.	Utrecht, The Netherlands		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf A/S	Oslo, Norway		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf GmbH	Vienna, Austria		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Sp.z. o.o.	Warsaw, Poland		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Lda.	Carnaxide, Portugal		100	%
LLC WINCOR NIXDORF	Moscow, Russia		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Oil and Gas IT LLC	Moscow, Russia		51	%
Wincor Nixdorf Oil and Gas IT Service LLC	Moscow, Russia		51	%
Wincor Nixdorf AB	Solna, Sweden		100	%
BEB Industrie- Elektronik AG	Burgdorf, Switzerland		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Finance AG	Baar, Switzerland		100	%

-2-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Company Name	Registered Office	Percent of ownership interest/voting securities owned by Wincor Nixdorf Group
Wincor Nixdorf AG	Brüttisellen, Switzerland		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF s.r.o.	Bratislava, Slovakia		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf S.L.	Madrid, Spain		100	%
Dynasty Technology Group, S.A.U.	Madrid, Spain		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf s.r.o.	Prague, Czech Republic		100	%
WN CZ RETAIL SOLUTIONS s.r.o.	Prague, Czech Republic		100	%
Aevi CZ s.r.o.	Prague, Czech Republic		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Bilgisayar Sistemleri A.S.	Kadikoy/Istanbul, Turkey		100	%
LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY WINCOR NIXDORF	Kiew, Ukraine		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Kft.	Budapest, Hungary		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Soluções em Tecnologia da Informação Ltda.	Atibaia/São Paulo, Brazil		100	%
Dynasty Technology Brasil Software Ltda.	Barueri/São Paulo, Brazil		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Canada Inc.	Mississuaga/ Ontario, Canada		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf IT Support S.A. de C.V.	Mexico City, Mexico		99,99	%
Wincor Nixdorf S.A. de C.V.	Mexico City, Mexico		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Inc.	Austin, USA		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf C.A.	Caracas, Venezuela		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF AUSTRALIA PTY LTD	Frenchs Forest/Sydney, Australia		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf (Hong Kong) Ltd.	Kwun Tong, Kowloon/ Hong Kong, China		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Retail & Banking Systems (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.	Shanghai, China		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Manufacturing (Shanghai) Co., Ltd.	Shanghai, China		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf India Private Ltd.	Mumbai, India		100	%
PT. Wincor Nixdorf Indonesia	Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF RETAIL SOLUTIONS (M) SDN. BHD	Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf (M) Sdn. Bhd.	Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF (PHILIPPINES), INC.	Makati City, Philippines		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF PTE. LTD.	Singapore		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF MANUFACTURING PTE. LTD	Singapore		100	%

-3-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Company Name	Registered Office	Percent of ownership interest/voting securities owned by Wincor Nixdorf Group
WINCOR NIXDORF Ltd.	Seoul, South Korea		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Taiwan Ltd.	Taipei, Taiwan		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf (Thailand) Co., Ltd.	Bangkok, Thailand		100	%
EURL WINCOR NIXDORF	Algiers, Algeria		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf S.A.	Casablanca, Morocco		100	%
WINCOR NIXDORF (PTY) LTD	Hurlingham-Sandton, South Africa		100	%
Wincor Nixdorf Retail ME DMCC (not fully consolidated)	Dubai, UAE		80	%
Wincor Nixdorf Limited (not fully consolidated)	Lagos, Nigeria		100	%
CI Tech Components AG (Joint Venture)	Burgdorf, Switzerland		50	%
CROWN B.V. (Joint Venture)	Delft, The Netherlands		50	%
WINSERVICE AS	Oslo, Norway		50	%

-4-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Annex 2:     List of shareholdings of the Diebold Group as of December 31, 2015

Company Name	Registered Office	Percent of ownership interest/voting securities owned by Diebold
Diebold Australia Holding Company, Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Diebold China Security Holding Company, Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Diebold Enterprise Security Systems, Inc.	Elmsford, New York		100	%
Diebold Global Finance Corporation	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Diebold Holding Company, Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Diebold Mexico Holding Company, Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Diebold Netherlands Holding Company, LLC	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%(1)
Diebold Self-Service Systems	Nyack, New York		100	%(2)
Diebold Software Solutions, Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Diebold SST Holding Company, Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Diebold Transaction Services, Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Impexa LLC	Houston, Texas		100	%(3)
Mayfair Software Distribution, Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Phoenix Interactive USA Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%(39)
VDM Holding Company, Inc.	Wilmington, Delaware		100	%
Verdi & Associates, Inc.	Buffalo, New York		100	%
1932780 Ontario Inc.	Ontario, Canada		100	%(40)
Altus Bilisim Hizmetleri Anonim Sirketi	Cankaya-Ankara, Turkey		100	%(36)
Bitelco Diebold Chile Limitada	Santiago, Chile		100	%(46)
C.R. Panama, Inc.	Panama, Panama		100	%(11)
Cable Print B.V.B.A.	Erpe Mere, Belgium		100	%(38)
Caribbean Self Service and Security LTD.	Bridgetown, Barbados		50	%(10)
Central de Alarmas Adler, S.A. de C.V.	Nuevo Leon, Mexico		100	%(20)
Cryptera A/S	Glostrup, Denmark		100	%(27)
D&G ATMS y Seguridad de Costa Rica Ltda.	San Jose, Costa Rica		99.99	%(34)
D&G Centroamerica y GBM de Nicaragua y Compañia Ltda.	Managua, Nicaragua		99	%(32)
D&G Centroamerica, S. de R.L.	Panama, Panama		51	%(30)
D&G Dominicana S.A.	Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic		99.85	%(33)
D&G Honduras S. de R.L.	Tegucigalpa, Honduras		99	%(32)
D&G Panama S. de R.L.	Panama, Panama		99.99	%(34)
DB & GB de El Salvador Limitada	San Salvador, El Salvador		99	%(32)

-1-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Company Name	Registered Office	Percent of ownership interest/voting securities owned by Diebold
DB&G ATMs Seguridad de Guatemala, Limitada	Ciudad, Guatemala		99	%(32)
DBD EMEA Holding C.V.	Utrecht, The Netherlands		100	%(28)
DCHC, S.A.	Panama, Panama		100	%(11)
Diamond UK Holdings LLP	Middlesex, United Kingdom		100	%(43)
Diebold Africa (Pty) Ltd.	Johannesburg, South Africa		100	%(18)
Diebold Africa Investment Holdings Pty. Ltd.	Johannesburg, South Africa		100	%(27)
Diebold Argentina, S.A.	Buenos Aires, Argentina		100	%(11)
Diebold ATM Cihazlari Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.	Istanbul, Turkey		100	%(16)
Diebold Australia Pty. Ltd.	Sydney, Australia		100	%(4)
Diebold (Barbados) Holdings 1 Corp.	Christ Church, Barbados		100	%
Diebold (Barbados) Holdings 2 Corp.	Christ Church, Barbados		100	%
Diebold (Barbados) Holdings 3 Corp.	Christ Church, Barbados		100	%(43)
Diebold Belgium B.V.B.A	Zellik, Belgium		100	%(17)
Diebold Bolivia S.R. L.	La Paz, Bolivia		100	%(31)
Diebold Brasil LTDA	Sao Paulo, Brazil		100	%(29)
Diebold Brasil Servicos de Tecnologia e Participacoes Ltda	Sao Paulo, Brazil		100	%(23)
Diebold Canada Holding Company Inc.	Alberta, Canada		100	%
Diebold Colombia S.A.	Bogota, Columbia		100	%(14)
Diebold—Corp Systems Sdn. Bhd.	Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia		100	%
Diebold Ecuador SA	Bodegas La Carlota, Ecuador		100	%(19)
Diebold EMEA Processing Centre Limited	Middlesex, United Kingdom		100	%
Diebold Financial Equipment Company (China), Ltd.	Shanghai, Peoples Republic of China		85	%(25)
Diebold France SARL	Guyancourt Cedex, France		100	%(5)
Diebold Germany GmbH	Eschborn, Germany		100	%(5)
Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA	Eschborn, Germany		100	%
Diebold Hong Kong Services Limited (f/k/a SIAB (HK) Ltd.)	North Point, Hong Kong		100	%(7)
Diebold Hungary Trading & Servicing LLC	Budapest, Hungary		100	%(37)
Diebold Hungary Self-Service Solutions, Ltd.	Budapest, Hungary		100	%
Diebold International Limited	Middlesex, United Kingdom		100	%(5)
Diebold Italia S.p.A.	Milano, Italy		100	%(13)
Diebold Kazakhstan LLP	Almaty, Kazakhstan		100	%(5)
Diebold de Mexico, S.A. de C.V.	Mexico City, Mexico		100	%(45)
Diebold Netherlands B.V.	Utrecht, The Netherlands		100	%(5)
Diebold One UK Limited	Middlesex, United Kingdom		100	%

-2-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Company Name	Registered Office	Percent of ownership interest/voting securities owned by Diebold
Diebold Österreich Selbstbedienungssysteme GmbH	Wiener Neudorf, Austria		100	%(5)
Diebold Pacific, Limited	North Point, Hong Kong		100	%
Diebold Panama, Inc.	Panama, Panama		100	%(11)
Diebold Paraguay S.A.	Asuncion, Paraguay		100	%(21)
Diebold Peru S.r.l	Lima, Peru		100	%(11)
Diebold Philippines, Inc.	Makati City, Philippines		100	%
Diebold Poland S.p. z.o.o.	Warsaw, Poland		100	%(5)
Diebold Portugal—Solucoes de Automatizacao, Limitada	Amadora, Portugal		100	%(5)
Diebold Selbstbedienungssysteme (Schweiz) GmbH	Wangen-Bruttisellen, Switzerland		100	%(5)
Diebold Self-Service Solutions Limited Liability Company	Wangen-Bruttisellen, Switzerland		100	%(15)
Diebold Self Service Solutions Namibia (Pty) Ltd	Windhoek, Namibia		100	%(41)
Diebold Self-Service Ltd.	Moscow, Russia		100	%(5)
Diebold Self-Service Solutions Industrial and Servicing Rom Srl	Bucharest, Romania		100	%(42)
Diebold Singapore Pte. Ltd.	Braddell View, Singapore		100	%
Diebold Software Solutions UK Ltd.	Middlesex, United Kingdom		100	%(9)
Diebold South Africa (Pty) Ltd.	Johannesburg, South Africa		74.9	%(26)
Diebold Spain, S.L.	Madrid, Spain		100	%(22)
Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC	Wangen-Bruttisellen, Switzerland		100	%
Diebold Systems Private Limited	Mumbai, India		100	%(8)
Diebold (Thailand) Company Limited	Bangkok, Thailand		100	%(4)
Diebold Uruguay S.A.	Montevideo, Uruguay		100	%(11)
Diebold Vietnam Company Limited	Hanoi, Vietnam		100	%
GAS Informática Ltda.	Distrito Federal, Brazil		100	%(35)
J.J.F. Panama, Inc.	Panama, Panama		100	%(11)
Phoenix Interactive (Aust) Pty Ltd.	Sydney, Australia		100	%(39)
Phoenix Interactive Design Inc.	Ontario, Canada		100	%(39)
Phoenix Interactive (UK)	Scotland, United Kingdom		100	%(39)
P.T. Diebold Indonesia	Jakarta Selatan, Indonesia		100	%(6)
Procomp Amazonia Industria Eletronica S.A.	Amazonas, Brazil		100	%(12)
Procomp Industria Eletronica LTDA	Sao Paulo, Brazil		100	%(24)
The Diebold Company of Canada, Ltd.	Ontario, Canada		100	%

(1) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Australia Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(2) 70 percent of partnership interest is owned by Diebold Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group, while the remaining 30 percent partnership interest is owned by Diebold SST Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(3) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Mexico Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(4) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold EMEA Holding C.V. (refer to 28 for ownership).

-3-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(5) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Self-Service Solutions Limited Liability Company, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(6) 88.9 percent of voting securities are owned by the Diebold Group, and 11.1 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Pacific, Limited, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(7) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Self Service Systems (refer to 2 for ownership).

(8) 70.70 percent of voting securities are owned by the Diebold Group; 21.55 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Self-service Solutions Limited Liability Company (refer to 15 for ownership); 7.73 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group and the remaining 0.02 percent of voting securities is owned by Diebold Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(9) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Software Solutions, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(10) 50 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(11) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(12) 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Brasil LTDA, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group, while the remaining 0.01 percent is owned by the Diebold Group.

(13) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold International Limited, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Self-Service Solutions Limited Liability Company, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(14) 21.44 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group; 16.78 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Panama, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group; 16.78 percent of voting securities are owned by DCHC SA, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group; 13.5 percent of voting securities are owned by J.J.F. Panama, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group; and the remaining 31.5 percent of voting securities are owned by C.R. Panama, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(15) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(16) 50 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Netherlands B.V., which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Self-Service Solutions Limited Liability Company, while the remaining 50 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Self-Service Solutions Limited Liability Company, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(17) 10 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Selbstbedienungssysteme GmbH, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Self Service Solutions Limited Liability Company, while the remaining 90 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Self -Service Solutions Limited Liability Company, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(18) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Africa Investment Holdings Pty. Ltd., which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(19) 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Colombia SA (refer to 14 for ownership), while the remaining 0.01 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(20) .01 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold de Mexico S.A. de C.V. (refer to 45 for ownership), while 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by Impexa LLC, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Mexico Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(21) 1 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold, while 99 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(22) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by VDM Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(23) 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Canada Holding Company Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group, while the remaining 0.01 percent is owned by Procomp Amazonia Industria Eletronica S.A. (refer to 12 for ownership).

(24) 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Brasil Servicos e Participacoes Limitada (refer to 23 for ownership), while the remaining 0.01 percent are owned by the Diebold Group.

-4-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(25) 85 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(26) 74.9 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Africa Investment Holdings Pty. Ltd., which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(27) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(28) 99 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Australia Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group, and the remaining 1 percent is owned by Diebold Netherlands Holding Company, LLC (refer to 1 for ownership).

(29) 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group, while the remaining 0.01 percent are owned by the Diebold Group.

(30) 51 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(31) 60 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Colombia, S.A. (refer to 14 for ownership) and 40 percent owned by Diebold Peru, S.r.L. (refer to 11 for ownership).

(32) 99 percent of voting securities are owned by D&G Centroamerica, S. de R. L. (refer to 30 for ownership).

(33) 99.85 percent of voting securities are owned by D&G Centroamerica, S. de R. L. (refer to 30 for ownership).

(34) 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by D&G Centroamerica, S. de R. L. (refer to 30 for ownership).

(35) 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by Procomp Industria Eletronica Ltda (refer to 24 for ownership), while the remaining 0.01 percent is owned by Diebold Brasil Ltda (refer to 29 for ownership).

(36) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold ATM Cihazlari Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S. (refer to 16 for ownership).

(37) 99.98 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Self-Service Solutions Limited Liability Company (refer to 15 for ownership), while the remaining 0.02 percent is owned by Diebold Poland S.p. z.o.o. (refer to 5 for ownership).

(38) 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by the Diebold Group, while the remaining 0.01 percent is owned by Diebold Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(39) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by 1932780 Ontario Inc., which is 100 percent owned by The Diebold Company of Canada, Ltd., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(40) 100 percent of voting securities is owned by The Diebold Company of Canada, Ltd., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(41) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Africa (Proprietary) Limited, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Africa Investment Holdings (Proprietary) Limited, which is 100 percent owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(42) 99.99 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Self-Service Solutions Limited Liability Company (refer to 15 for ownership), while the remaining 0.01 percent is owned by Diebold Switzerland Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(43) 99.5 percent of voting securities are owned by the Diebold Group, while the remaining 0.5 percent is owned by Diebold Netherlands Holding Company, LLC (refer to 1 for ownership).

(44) 100 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold (Barbados) Holdings 2 Corp., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(45) 0.01 percent of voting securities are owned by the Diebold Group, while the remaining 99.99 percent is owned by Diebold Mexico Holding Company, Inc., which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

(46) 99.88 percent of voting securities are owned by the Diebold Group, while 0.12 percent of voting securities are owned by Diebold Latin America Holding Company, LLC, which is 100 percent owned by the Diebold Group.

-5-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Annex 3: Final draft of the Domination and Profit-and-Loss Transfer Agreement between Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft and Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA together with the Guarantee from Diebold, Incorporated

Final Draft of the

Domination and Profit-and-Loss Transfer Agreement

1. Final Draft

The attached draft of the domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement between Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf AG (hereinafter the “Agreement”) is to be presented to the shareholders’ meetings of both Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf AG.

2. Potential Adjustment of Sections 4 and 5 of the Agreement

The determinative date for determining the enterprise valuation of Wincor Nixdorf AG and, hence, for the amounts of the Recurring Compensation and Exit Compensation contained in Sections 4 and 5 of the Agreement is the day of the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled for September 26, 2016. The amounts in the attached final draft are based on the rate as of today’s final draft amounting to 0.7%. In the current market environment, it cannot be ruled out that the base interest rate will change in a relevant scope for the calculation of the Recurring Compensation requiring adaption between the date of this Report and the date of the resolution of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG scheduled on September 26, 2016.

Therefore, it is to be shown by example how the Recurring Compensation and the Exit Compensation stipulated in the Agreement would change if the base interest rate were to decrease to a) 0.6 percent or b) 0.5 percent or to increase to c) 0.8 percent.

a) In the event that on September 26, 2016 the base interest rate is 0.6%, Sections 4 (2) and 5 (1) will have the following wording:

-1-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

§ 4 (2):

“(2) The Recurring Compensation Payment amounts for each full fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG for each no-par value bearer share in Wincor Nixdorf AG (Aktien ohne Nennbetrag), each with a notional value of €1.00, (each a “Wincor Nixdorf Share” and when taken together the “Wincor Nixdorf Shares”) to €3.15 gross (“Gross Compensation Amount”) less any amount of corporate income tax (Körperschaftsteuer) and solidarity surcharge (Solidaritätszuschlag) at the prevailing rate of these taxes for the relevant fiscal year (“Net Compensation Amount”), whereby this deduction is to be effected only on any portion of the Gross Compensation Amount from profits which are subject to German corporate income tax. When rounded to a full cent-amount in accordance with commercial practices, this portion amounts to €1.98 per Wincor Nixdorf Share. Based on the circumstances at the time of the conclusion of this agreement, this results in a Recurring Compensation of €2.83 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share for an entire fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG. For the avoidance of doubt, it is agreed that any withholding tax (such as capital gains tax plus solidarity surcharge thereon) shall be withheld from the Net Compensation Amount to the extent required by statute. The Recurring Compensation Payment is due on the first banking day following the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG for the respective preceding fiscal year but in any event within eight months following expiration of this fiscal year.”

§ 5 (1):

“(1) Diebold KGaA undertakes upon demand of any outside shareholder of Wincor Nixdorf AG to purchase such shareholder’s Wincor Nixdorf Shares in exchange for a cash compensation (“Exit Compensation”) (Abfindung) in the amount of €54.17 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share.”

b) In the event that on September 26, 2016 the base interest rate is 0.5%, Sections 4 (2) and 5 (1) will have the following wording:

-2-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

§ 4 (2):

“(2) The Recurring Compensation Payment amounts for each full fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG for each no-par value bearer share in Wincor Nixdorf AG (Aktien ohne Nennbetrag), each with a notional value of €1.00, (each a “Wincor Nixdorf Share” and when taken together the “Wincor Nixdorf Shares”) to €3.13 gross (“Gross Compensation Amount”) less any amount of corporate income tax (Körperschaftsteuer) and solidarity surcharge (Solidaritätszuschlag) at the prevailing rate of these taxes for the relevant fiscal year (“Net Compensation Amount”), whereby this deduction is to be effected only on any portion of the Gross Compensation Amount from profits which are subject to German corporate income tax. When rounded to a full cent-amount in accordance with commercial practices, this portion amounts to €1.97 per Wincor Nixdorf Share. Based on the circumstances at the time of the conclusion of this agreement, this results in a Recurring Compensation of €2.82 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share for an entire fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG. For the avoidance of doubt, it is agreed that any withholding tax (such as capital gains tax plus solidarity surcharge thereon) shall be withheld from the Net Compensation Amount to the extent required by statute. The Recurring Compensation Payment is due on the first banking day following the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG for the respective preceding fiscal year but in any event within eight months following expiration of this fiscal year.”

§ 5 (1):

“(1) Diebold KGaA undertakes upon demand of any outside shareholder of Wincor Nixdorf AG to purchase such shareholder’s Wincor Nixdorf Shares in exchange for a cash compensation (“Exit Compensation”) (Abfindung) in the amount of €55.02 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share.”

c) In the event that on September 26, 2016 the base interest rate is 0.8%, Sections 4 (2) and 5 (1) will have the following wording:

-3-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

§ 4 (2):

“(2) The Recurring Compensation Payment amounts for each full fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG for each no-par value bearer share in Wincor Nixdorf AG (Aktien ohne Nennbetrag), each with a notional value of €1.00, (each a “Wincor Nixdorf Share” and when taken together the “Wincor Nixdorf Shares”) to €3.18 gross (“Gross Compensation Amount”) less any amount of corporate income tax (Körperschaftsteuer) and solidarity surcharge (Solidaritätszuschlag) at the prevailing rate of these taxes for the relevant fiscal year (“Net Compensation Amount”), whereby this deduction is to be effected only on any portion of the Gross Compensation Amount from profits which are subject to German corporate income tax. When rounded to a full cent-amount in accordance with commercial practices, this portion amounts to €2.01 per Wincor Nixdorf Share. Based on the circumstances at the time of the conclusion of this agreement, this results in a Recurring Compensation of €2.87 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share for an entire fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG. For the avoidance of doubt, it is agreed that any withholding tax (such as capital gains tax plus solidarity surcharge thereon) shall be withheld from the Net Compensation Amount to the extent required by statute. The Recurring Compensation Payment is due on the first banking day following the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG for the respective preceding fiscal year but in any event within eight months following expiration of this fiscal year.”

§ 5 (1)

“(1) Diebold KGaA undertakes upon demand of any outside shareholder of Wincor Nixdorf AG to purchase such shareholder’s Wincor Nixdorf Shares in exchange for a cash compensation (“Exit Compensation”) (Abfindung) in the amount of €52.54 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share.”

In the current market environment it further cannot be ruled out that the base interest rate may even decrease below 0.5% or increase above 0.8%. Such a change of interest rate levels would affect the calculation of the Recurring Compensation and the Exit Compensation beyond the scenarios described in a) through c). The effect of a change in the base interest rate between the date of this Report and the date of the shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG on the determination of the adequate Recurring Compensation and the adequate Exit

-4-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Compensation are described in more detail under no. 395 et seqq. (Exit Compensation) and no. 400 et seqq. (Recurring Compensation) of the expert opinion by PricewaterhouseCoopers Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main of August 16, 2016 regarding the calculation of the value of Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft as of September 26, 2016 (the “Valuation Report”) and to be agreed upon mutually between the Parties. The Valuation Report is reprinted as Annex 5 to the Audit Report jointly issued by the management of Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA and the management board of Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft pursuant to Sec. 293a Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz) and can be accessed on the website of Wincor Nixdorf AG (http://www.wincor-nixdorf.com/) under Investor Relations/Annual General Meeting from the date on which the general shareholders’ meeting is convened.

-5-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

FINAL DRAFT

Domination and Profit-and-Loss Transfer Agreement

between

Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, Mergenthalerallee 10-12, 65760 Eschborn, Germany, registered in the commercial register (Handelsregister) at the Local Court (Amtsgericht) Frankfurt am Main (HRB 104287)

– „Diebold KGaA” –

and

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1, 33106 Paderborn, Germany, registered in the commercial register (Handelsregister) at the Local Court (Amtsgericht) Paderborn (HRB 6846)

– „Wincor Nixdorf AG” –

-6-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

§ 1 Managerial Control

(1) Wincor Nixdorf AG submits the managerial control (Leitung) of its company to Diebold KGaA. Diebold KGaA is accordingly entitled to issue instructions (Weisungen) to the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG with regard to the managerial control of the company, generally and with regard to individual cases. Diebold KGaA is not entitled to issue the instruction to the management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG to amend, maintain or terminate this agreement.

(2) The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is required to comply with the instructions of Diebold KGaA as specified in Article 1 para. 1 and in accordance with Section 308 of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz – “AktG”).

(3) Any instructions require text form (Textform) or, if the instructions are issued orally, they shall be confirmed in text form without undue delay.

§ 2 Transfer of Profit

(1) Wincor Nixdorf AG undertakes to transfer its entire annual profit (Gewinnabführung) to Diebold KGaA. Subject to establishing or dissolving reserves in accordance with Article 2 para. 2 of this agreement below, the maximum amount permissible under Section 301 AktG, as amended from time to time, shall be transferred.

(2) Wincor Nixdorf AG may, with consent of Diebold KGaA, allocate parts of its annual profit to other profit reserves if and to the extent permissible under commercial law and as economically justified by reasonable commercial judgement. If amounts are allocated to other profit reserves during the course of this agreement, these amounts may be withdrawn from the other profit reserves upon request of Diebold KGaA in text form and transferred as profit. Other reserves or profits carried forward from the period prior to the term of this agreement may neither be transferred as profit nor be used to compensate for any annual deficit.

(3) The obligation to transfer the annual profit applies for the first time to the entire profits generated in the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which this agreement becomes effective according to Article 7 para. 2 of this agreement, and is in each case due upon approval of the respective annual financial statement of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

-7-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

§ 3 Assumption of Losses

(1) Diebold KGaA is obliged towards Wincor Nixdorf AG to assume any losses (Verlustübernahme) in accordance with the provisions of Section 302 AktG in their entirety as amended from time to time.

(2) The obligation to assume any losses applies for the first time to the entire fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which this agreement becomes effective according to Article 7 para. 2 of this agreement, and is in each case due at the end of the respective fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

(3) In event that this agreement is ended during a fiscal year, and specifically in the event of termination for cause (wichtiger Grund), Diebold KGaA is required to assume the deficit by Wincor Nixdorf AG, as shown in the balance sheet to be drawn up for the date of effectiveness of the termination.

§ 4 Compensation

(1) Diebold KGaA guarantees that it will pay to outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG as adequate compensation a recurring cash compensation (“Recurring Compensation Payment” or “Recurring Compensation”) (Ausgleichszahlung or Ausgleich) for the term of this agreement.

(2) The Recurring Compensation Payment amounts for each full fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG for each no-par value bearer share in Wincor Nixdorf AG (Aktien ohne Nennbetrag), each with a notional value of €1.00, (each a “Wincor Nixdorf Share” and when taken together the “Wincor Nixdorf Shares”) to €3.17 gross (“Gross Compensation Amount”) less any amount of corporate income tax (Körperschaftsteuer) and solidarity surcharge (Solidaritätszuschlag) at the prevailing rate of these taxes for the relevant fiscal year (“Net Compensation Amount”), whereby this deduction is to be effected only on any portion of the Gross Compensation Amount from profits which are subject to German corporate income tax. When rounded to a full cent-amount in accordance with commercial practices, this portion amounts to €1.99 per Wincor Nixdorf Share. Based on the circumstances at the time of the conclusion of this agreement, this results in a Recurring Compensation of €2.85 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share for an entire fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG. For the avoidance of doubt, it is agreed that any withholding tax (such as capital gains tax plus solidarity surcharge thereon) shall be withheld from the Net Compensation Amount to the extent required by statute. The Recurring Compensation Payment is due on the first banking day following the ordinary general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG for the respective preceding fiscal year but in any event within eight months following expiration of this fiscal year.

-8-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(3) The Recurring Compensation Payment is first granted for the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG in which this agreement becomes effective according to Article 7 para. 2.

(4) If this agreement ends during a fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG or if Wincor Nixdorf AG establishes a short fiscal year (Rumpfgeschäftsjahr) during the effectiveness of this agreement, the Recurring Compensation is reduced to pro rata temporis for the relevant fiscal year.

(5) If the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG is increased from the company’s own funds in exchange for the issuance of new shares, the Gross Compensation Amount per Wincor Nixdorf Share changes to such an extent that the total amount of the Gross Compensation Amount remains unchanged. If the share capital is increased by cash contributions and/or by contributions in kind, the rights under this Article 4 also apply for the shares subscribed to by outside shareholders for such capital increase. The beginning of each entitlement of new shares pursuant to this Article 4 follows the dividend entitlement set by Wincor Nixdorf AG when issuing new shares.

(6) If appraisal proceedings are initiated pursuant to the German Act on Appraisal Proceedings (Spruchverfahrensgesetz – “SpruchG”) and the adjudicating court sets a legally binding higher Recurring Compensation Payment, the shareholders, even if they have already been compensated in accordance with Article 5, are entitled to demand a corresponding payment in addition to already received Recurring Compensation Payment. Likewise, all other outside shareholders will be treated in the same way if Diebold KGaA commits to a higher Recurring Compensation vis-à-vis an outside shareholder of Wincor Nixdorf AG in a court settlement to avoid or end appraisal proceedings.

§ 5 Exit Compensation

(1) Diebold KGaA undertakes upon demand of any outside shareholder of Wincor Nixdorf AG to purchase such shareholder’s Wincor Nixdorf Shares in exchange for a cash compensation (“Exit Compensation”) (Abfindung) in the amount of €53.34 for each Wincor Nixdorf Share.

-9-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(2) The obligation of Diebold KGaA to acquire Wincor Nixdorf Shares is for a limited time. The time limitation period ends two months after the date on which the entry of the existence of this agreement in the commercial register at the registered seat of Wincor Nixdorf AG has been announced pursuant to Section 10 of the German Commercial Code (Handelsgesetzbuch – HGB). An extension of the time limitation period pursuant to Section 305 para. 4 sentence 3 AktG as a result of a motion for determination of the adequate Recurring Compensation or Exit Compensation by a court pursuant to Section 2 SpruchG remains unaffected; in this event, the time limitation period ends two months after the date on which the decision on the last motion ruled on has been announced in the Federal Gazette (Bundesanzeiger).

(3) If the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG is increased from the company’s own funds in exchange for the issuance of new shares prior to the expiration of the time limitation period set forth in Article 5 para. 2 of this agreement, the Exit Compensation for each Wincor Nixdorf Share is reduced to such an extent that the total amount of the Exit Compensation remains unchanged. If the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG is increased prior to expiration of the time limitation period set forth in Article 5 para. 2 of this agreement by means of cash contributions and/or contributions in kind, the rights under this Article 5 also apply for the shares subscribed to by outside shareholders in such capital increase.

(4) If proceedings are initiated pursuant to Section 1 number 1 SpruchG and the court adjudicates a higher Exit Compensation, shareholders who have already received Exit Compensation can also require a corresponding supplement to the Exit Compensation already received. Similarly, all other outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG will be treated in the same way if Diebold KGaA commits to a higher Exit Compensation vis-à-vis a shareholder of Wincor Nixdorf AG in a settlement to avoid or end proceedings pursuant to Section 1 number 1 SpruchG.

(5) The transfer of Wincor Nixdorf Shares in exchange for Exit Compensation is without charge to outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG, provided that they have a domestic securities deposit account.

§ 6 Right to Information

Diebold KGaA is entitled to inspect the books and records of Wincor Nixdorf AG at any time. The management board of Wincor Nixdorf AG is required to supply Diebold KGaA at any time with all requested information on all matters relating to Wincor Nixdorf AG. Notwithstanding the rights agreed to above, Wincor Nixdorf AG is required to keep Diebold KGaA continuously informed on the business development, and, specifically, on material transactions.

-10-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

§ 7 Effectiveness and Term of this Agreement

(1) This agreement requires for its effectiveness the consent of the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf AG and the general shareholders’ meeting of Diebold KGaA as well as the consent of Diebold, Incorporated as general partner (persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin) of Diebold KGaA.

(2) This agreement becomes effective upon registration of its existence in the commercial register at the registered seat of Wincor Nixdorf AG.

(3) This agreement is concluded for an indefinite period of time. It can be terminated with a notice period of six months prior to the end of the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG. Subject to the provisions in Article 7 para. 4, this agreement can be ordinarily terminated for the first time as of the end of the fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf AG that ends at least five years (Zeitjahre) (60 months) after the beginning of the fiscal year in which this agreement becomes effective.

(4) Each party can terminate this agreement for cause (wichtiger Grund) without compliance with any notice period. Cause exists in particular if Diebold KGaA disposes of or contributes (Einbringung) its participation Wincor Nixdorf AG, or in case of a merger (Verschmelzung), spin-off (Spaltung) or liquidation of Diebold KGaA or Wincor Nixdorf AG.

(5) In the event of termination for cause (wichtiger Grund) without notice, this agreement lapses at the end of the date stated in the notice of termination provided that this is no earlier than the day on which notice of termination is served.

(6) If the agreement ends, Diebold KGaA must furnish security to the creditors of Wincor Nixdorf AG pursuant to Section 303 AktG.

(7) Any notice of termination must be in writing.

§ 8 Guarantee

Diebold, Incorporated with its seat in North Canton, Ohio, USA (“Diebold Inc.”) directly holds 100% of the limited partnership shares and therewith all shares in Diebold KGaA. Diebold Inc., in its capacity as personally liable partner (persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin) of Diebold KGaA, is not required to deposit contributions to Diebold KGaA. Diebold Inc. in its capacity

-11-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

as direct shareholder, has, without joining the agreement as a party, provided the guarantee attached for information purposes to this agreement as an annex. This guarantee is not part of this agreement. In this guarantee Diebold Inc. undertakes, without limitation and irrevocably, to ensure that Diebold KGaA will be financially equipped in a way that Diebold KGaA is at all times able to fulfil all its obligations arising from or in connection with this agreement completely and in time. This applies in particular to the obligation to assume losses pursuant to Section 302 AktG as amended. The contractual obligation assumed by Diebold Inc. pursuant to the two preceding sentences will only result in a payment obligation when and to the extent it is specifically foreseeable that Diebold KGaA will not be able to fully meet its obligations under or in connection with the Agreement when due. According to this guarantee, Diebold Inc. also undertakes towards the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG irrevocably and in principle without limitation that Diebold KGaA fulfils all its obligations towards them arising from or in connection with this agreement completely and in time, in particular with respect to the payment of a Recurring Compensation Payment and the Exit Compensation. To that extent, the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG have an own claim according to Section 328 para. 1 of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch – “BGB”) directed at payment to Diebold KGaA under the guarantee. The liability of Diebold Inc. pursuant to the two aforementioned sentences under the guarantee shall only apply to the extent that Diebold KGaA does not fulfil its obligations towards the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG arising from or in connection with this agreement completely and in time and Diebold Inc. does not comply with the obligation to equip Diebold KGaA described above.

§ 9 Miscellaneous

(1) To the extent a provision of this agreement is or becomes invalid or impracticable in full or in part, or if this agreement does not contain a necessary provision, the validity of the remaining provisions of this agreement shall not be affected. In place of the invalid or impracticable provision, or in order to remedy an omission in this agreement, an appropriate provision shall apply which corresponds as far as legally permissible to what the parties intended or would have intended in accordance with the intent and purpose of this agreement if they had been aware of the provision. Furthermore, when interpreting this agreement, the income tax provisions for recognition of a fiscal unity, especially Sections 14 to 19 of the German Corporate Income Tax Act (Körperschaftsteuergesetz) as amended shall be taken into account.

-12-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

(2) The parties explicitly declare that the present agreement is not intended to form a legal unity (Section 139 BGB) with the guarantee attached to this agreement as annex for information purposes only and other legal transactions or agreements effected or concluded between the parties or between Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. in the past or which may be effected or concluded between the parties or Wincor Nixdorf AG and Diebold Inc. in the future.

(3) Amendments and supplements to this agreement must be in writing to be effective. This specifically also applies to this clause requiring written form. The provisions of Section 295 AktG apply.

(4) As far as legally permissible, Paderborn is the place of performance for reciprocal obligations and the exclusive legal venue.

-13-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

IN GEGENSEITIGEM EINVERSTÄNDNIS ZUM BEHERRSCHUNGS- UND GEWINNABFÜHRUNGSVERTRAG:

Im Namen der Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA

Ort:                                                  

Datum:        2016

Christopher A. Chapman

als Finanzvorstand (CFO) der Diebold, Incorporated in ihrer Eigenschaft als persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin der Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA

IN GEGENSEITIGEM EINVERSTÄNDNIS ZUM BEHERRSCHUNGS- UND GEWINNABFÜHRUNGSVERTRAG:

Im Namen der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft:

Ort:                                                 

Datum:        2016

Eckard Heidloff	Dr. Jürgen Wunram
Vorsitzender des Vorstands der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft	Mitglied des Vorstands und stellvertretender Vorsitzender des Vorstands der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft
Olaf Heyden	Dr. Ulrich Näher
Mitglied des Vorstands der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft	Mitglied des Vorstands der Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft”

S-1

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Annex: Guarantee by Diebold, Incorporated

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

North Canton, August 16, 2016

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft

Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1

33106 Paderborn

Germany

Guarantee (Patronatserklärung)

Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, Mergenthalerallee 10-12, 65760 Eschborn, Germany, registered in the commercial register (Handelsregister) at the Local Court (Amtsgericht) Frankfurt am Main under company number HRB 104287 (“Diebold KGaA”), intends to enter into a domination and profit-and-loss transfer agreement (“Agreement”) (Beherrschungs- und Gewinnabführungsvertrag) with Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1, 33106 Paderborn, Germany, registered in the commercial register at the Local Court Paderborn under company number HRB 6846 (“Wincor Nixdorf”), with Wincor Nixdorf as the controlled and profit transferring company. Diebold, Incorporated, a stock corporation incorporated and operating under the laws of Ohio, USA, with its registered office in North Canton, Ohio, USA (“Diebold Inc.”), directly holds 100% of the limited partnership shares and therewith all shares in Diebold KGaA. Diebold Inc. in its capacity as general partner (persönlich haftende Gesellschafterin) of Diebold KGaA, is not required to deposit contributions to Diebold KGaA. Diebold Inc. hereby makes the following declarations without joining the Agreement as a party:

1. Diebold Inc. irrevocably undertakes without limitation to procure that Diebold KGaA will have sufficient financial means which enable Diebold KGaA at any time to meet all of its obligations arising from or in connection with the Agreement in full when they become due. This applies in particular to the obligation to assume losses pursuant to Section 302 of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz – AktG) as amended. The contractual obligation assumed by Diebold Inc. pursuant to the two preceding sentences will only result in a payment obligation when and to the extent it is specifically foreseeable that Diebold KGaA will not be able to fully meet its obligations under or in connection with the Agreement when due.

-1-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

2. Diebold Inc. irrevocably guarantees without limitation vis-à-vis the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf that Diebold KGaA will fulfill all its obligations towards them arising from or in connection with the Agreement in full when they become due, in particular with respect to a recurring compensation payment (Ausgleichszahlung) and the cash exit compensation (Abfindung). To this extent, outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf have an own right pursuant to Section 328 para. 1 of the German Civil Code (Bürgerliches Gesetzbuch – BGB) to demand payment to Diebold KGaA. The liability of Diebold Inc. pursuant to the two preceding sentences does, however, only apply to the extent Diebold KGaA does not fulfil its obligations toward the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf arising from or in connection with the Agreement in full when they become due and to the extent Diebold Inc. does not comply with its obligation to procure Diebold KGaA with sufficient financial means pursuant to Section 1 of this Guarantee.

3. This Guarantee is subject to the laws of the Federal Republic of Germany. To the extent legally possible, Diebold Inc. hereby subjects itself with regard to any disputes and claims under or in connection with this Guarantee to the jurisdiction of German courts with the courts of Paderborn having regional jurisdiction. In this context, Diebold Inc. acknowledges the enforceability of legally binding (rechtskräftig) decisions of German courts. Diebold KGaA, Att. the Management, Mergenthalerallee 10-12, 65760 Eschborn, Germany shall be the agent for services of process (Zustellungsbevollmächtigte) in Germany for all proceedings under or in connection with this Guarantee.

-2-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

UNTERSCHRIFTENSEITE ZUR PATRONATSERKLÄRUNG:

Im Namen der Diebold, Incorporated:

Ort:
Datum:	August 2016

Christopher A. Chapman

als Finanzvorstand (CFO) der Diebold, Incorporated

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

Annex 4: Order by the District Court (Landgericht) of Dortmund dated June 1, 2016 on the appointment of ADKL AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft as expert auditor (Contract Auditor) within the meaning of Section 293b (1) of the Stock Corporation Act

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

20 O 21/16 AktE

[Emblem of the state of North Rhine-Westphalia]

REGIONAL COURT (LANDGERICHT) DORTMUND

ORDER

In the proceedings concerning the conclusion of a domination- and profit or loss agreement

regarding

Wincor Nixdorf AG in Paderborn, Local Court (Amtsgericht) Paderborn under HRB 6846 and Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA in Eschborn, Local Court (Amtsgericht) Frankfurt a. M. under HRB 104287

upon joint application by both parties of May 25, 2016

ADKL AG

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Breite Straße 29-31

40213 Düsseldorf

-1-

NON-BINDING ENGLISH CONVENIENCE TRANSLATION

is hereby appointed as the court-appointed expert auditor (gerichtlich bestimmter Vertragsprüfer) pursuant to Sections 293b para. 1 sentence 1 German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz).

As per the declaration made to the Court on June 18, 2016, the company fulfills the requirements under Section 293c, 293d German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz) and, in particular, is not excluded from acting as an auditor pursuant to Sections 319, 319a, 319b German Commercial Code (Handelsgesetzbuch).

Dortmund, June 1, 2016

Regional Court, 20^th Civil Chamber – VI. Chamber for Commercial Matters

The Presiding Judge

Dr. Klumpe

Presiding Judge of the Regional Court

Certified

[Signature and stamp]

Kelch

Servant of the Court (Justizbeschäftigte)

-2-

Annex 5: Expert opinion of PricewaterhouseCoopers Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main of August 16, 2016 on the calculation of the value of Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft as of September 26, 2016

“PricewaterhouseCoopers” refers to the network of member firms

of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, each of which is a separate and independent legal entity.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Aktiengesellschaft Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

ist Mitglied der unter PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited kooperierenden eigenständigen und

rechtlich unabhängigen Mitgliedsfirmen des internationalen PricewaterhouseCoopers-Netzwerks

PwC

Table of Contents

01 Engagement and scope of work	6
02 Principles and methods of valuation	8
I. Basics of the valuation	8
II. Reasonable cash compensation pursuant to § 305 AktG	9
III. Reasonable recurring compensation pursuant to § 304 AktG	10
03 Description of the subject of the valuation	11
I. Legal situation	11
II. Tax situation	17
III. Economic background	20
1. Business operations	20
2. Market and competition	23
a.) Macroeconomic development	23
b.) Market trends Banking and Retail	24
c.) Competitive situation	39
3. Key success factors for the business model	42
4. Net assets, financial position and results of operations	44
a) Group net assets and financial position	44
b) Group results of operations	47
c) Adjustment to results of operations	51
04 Determination of business value of Wincor Nixdorf AG	53
I. Valuation basis	53
1. Procedure and fundamental premises	53
2. Planning process and planning accuracy	55
II. Anticipated net distributions from the operating business	60
1. Earnings before Interest and Income Taxes (EBITA) over the detailed planning period	60
2. Determining the contributions to earnings of synergies of relevance for the valuation	76
3. Earnings before Interest and Income Taxes (EBITA) as a perpetual annuity	78
4. Net distributions after personal income tax	82
III. Determination of the discount rate	84
1. Risk free rate	84
2. Risk premium	85
3. Terminal growth rate	92

1

PwC

4. Derivation of the discount rate	93
5. Earnings value of the business operations	94
IV. Business value and value per share	95
05 Liquidation value	96
06 Plausibility check of the business value on the basis of multiples	97
I. General procedure	97
II. Valuation using multiples based on capital market data	98
1. Derivation of multiples	98
2. Multiples valuation	99
07 Determination of an adequate cash compensation in accordance with § 305 of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz, AktG) and adequate recurring compensation in accordance with § 304 AktG	101
1. Share price	101
2. Determination of an adequate cash compensation	104
3. Determination of adequate recurring compensation	105
08 Summary of findings	108
Annex	110

Due to computational reasons rounding differences of ± (EUR, % etc.) may arise in tables.

2

PwC

List of Abbreviations

$	USD
%	percent
€	Euro
§	paragraph
AEVI	AEVI International GmbH, Paderborn/Germany
AG	Aktiengesellschaft
Aisino	Aisino Corporation, Peking/China
AktG	Aktiengesetz (German Stock Corporation Act)
Amendment S-4	Amendment No. 4 to FORM S-4 REGISTRATION STATEMENT
APAC	Asia and Pacific
approx.	approximately
ATM	Automated Teller Machine
BaFin	Bundesanstalt für Finanzdienstleistungsaufsicht, Bonn/Germany
BayObLG	Bayerisches Oberstes Landesgericht
Beta	Measure of risk according to CAPM
Beta raw	Beta obtained from a stock’s historical data
Beta unlevered	Beta of a company without any debt
BGH	Bundesgerichtshof (Federal Court of Justice)
Bid-Ask Spread	The amount by which the ask price exceeds the bid
Bloomberg	Bloomberg L.P., New York/New York/USA
BRIC	Brazil, Russia, India, China
Brink‘s	Brink‘s Nederland B.V., Houten/Netherlands
Bundesbank	Deutsche Bundesbank, Frankfurt am Main/Germany
BVerfG	Bundesverfassungsgericht (Federal Constitutional Court)
BvR	Federal Constitutional Court file number: Constitutional complaints procedure
ca.	circa
CAGR	Compound Annual Growth Rate
CAPM	Capital Asset Pricing Model
CET	Central European Time
cf.	compare
chap.	Chapter
CIQ	S&P Capital IQ, a business of The McGraw-Hill Companies, New York City/New York/USA
CNY	Renminbi Yuan
Critical T-Value	Value to determine the statistical significance
D/E	Debt-to-equity ratio
DAX	Deutscher Aktienindex (German stock index)

3

PwC

DCF	Discounted Cash Flow
Delta	Difference
Diebold	Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, Eschborn/Germany
Diebold Inc.	Diebold Inc., North Canton/Ohio/USA
DOI	Degree of Implementation
e.g.	exempli gratia (for example)
EBIT	Earnings Before Interest and Tax
EBITA	Earnings Before Interest, Tax and Amortization
EBITDA	Earnings Before Interest, Tax, Depreciation and Amortization of Goodwill
EBT	Earnings Before Tax
EMEA	Europe, the Middle East and Africa
EPOS	Electronic Point-of-Sale
EstG	Einkommensteuergesetz (German Income Tax Act)
et seq.	and the following
EU	European Union
EUR	Euro
EV	Enterprise Value
FAUB	Fachausschuss für Unternehmensbewertung und Betriebswirtschaft (Expert Committee for Company Valuation and Business Economics )
FC	Forecast
FY	Financial Year
GDP	Gross Domestic Product
Glory Ltd.	Glory Ltd., Himeji/Japan
GmbH	Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (limited liability company)
HGB	Handelsgesetzbuch (German Commercial Code)
i.e.	that is
IAS	International Accounting Standards
IDW	Institute of Public Auditors in Germany e.V., Dusseldorf
IDW S 1 i.d.F. 2008	IDW Standard 1 “Grundsätze zur Durchführung von Un-ternehmensbewertungen” (“Principles for the Performance of Business Valuations”) of the Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer in Deutschland e.V. (Institute of Public Auditors in Germany) as amended in 2008
IFRS	International Financial Reporting Standard(s)
IMF	International Monetary Fund, Washington D.C./USA
Inc.	Incorporated, U.S. legal form
Ingenico	Ingenico Group, Paris/France
IoT	Internet of Things
ISIN	International Securities Identification Number
IT	Information Technology
JPY	Japanese Yen

4

PwC

JV	Joint Venture
k	Thousand
KSt	Körperschaftsteuer (corporate tax)
KStG	Körperschaftsteuergesetz (German Corporation Tax Act)
m	Million
M2M	Machine-to-Machine
mbH	mit beschränkter Haftung (German private limited company)
MDAX	Mid-Cap-DAX
MEA	Middle East and Africa
mEUR	Euro in Millions
mPOS	Mobile Point-of Sale
mUSD	USD in Millions
NCR	NCR Corporation, Duluth/Georgia/USA
No.	Number
Oki	Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo/Japan
P.	Page
PER	Price-earnings ratio
POS	Point-of-Sale
Projective NV	Projective NV, Brussels/Belgium
PWC	PricewaterhouseCoopers AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main/Germany
R&D	Research and Development
RVS	Reverse vending system
SCO	Self-Checkout-System
SDAX	Small-Cap-DAX
SG&A	Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
SolZ	Solidaritätszuschlag (solidarity surcharge)
Tax-CAPM	Tax-Capital Asset Pricing Model
T-test	Statistical hypothesis test
TV	Terminal Value
USA	United States of America
USD	United States Dollar
VeriFone	VeriFone Systems, Inc., San Jose/California/USA
VWAP	Volume Weighted Average Price
Wincor Nixdorf	Wincor Nixdorf AG, Paderborn/Germany
WKN	Wertpapierkennnummer (German securities identification code)
WpÜG	Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetz (German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act)
WpÜG-AngVO	WpÜG - Angebotsverordnung (German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act - Offer Regulation)
XETRA	Exchange Electronic Trading

5

PwC

01 Engagement and scope of work

1. With its letter dated 12 May 2016, the Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf AG, Paderborn (“Wincor Nixdorf” or “the company”) and the management of Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, Eschborn (“Diebold”) – a fully owned subsidiary of Diebold Inc. North Canton, Ohio, USA (“Diebold Inc.”) has – retained us, PricewaterhouseCoopers AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main (“PwC”), to provide an expert opinion on the objectified business value of

Wincor Nixdorf AG

as well as to determine an adequate cash compensation pursuant to § 305 AktG and an adequate recurring compensation pursuant to § 304 AktG.

2. The reason for this valuation is the intended completion of a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement in accordance with § 291(1) AktG between Diebold and Wincor Nixdorf. The expert opinion regarding the business value of Wincor Nixdorf serves as a basis to determine the adequate cash compensation pursuant to § 305 AktG and the adequate recurring compensation pursuant to § 304 AktG for the outside shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf.

3. In accordance with § 293(2) AktG, the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement is subject to approval by the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf as well as to approval by the management of Diebold pursuant § 293(2) AktG. The valuation date is the date of the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf at which the resolution is adopted and which has been scheduled for 26 September 2016.

4. We conducted our work from May to August 2016 in the business premises of Wincor Nixdorf as well as in the office of PwC in Düsseldorf and Frankfurt am Main. Our valuation is primarily based on the following documents made available to us:

• Audited consolidated financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”), as they are to be applied within the EU as well as the supplementary regulations under commercial law according to § 315a Abs. 1 HGB, for the financial years 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15, each issued with an unqualified audit opinion,

• Audited annual financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf and of Wincor Nixdorf International GmbH, Paderborn, pursuant to HGB for financial years 2012/13, 2013/14 and 2014/15, each issued with an unqualified audit opinion,

• Unaudited interim financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf as of 31 March 2016 and as of 30 June 2016,

• Consolidated financial planning figures of Wincor Nixdorf for the financial years 2015/2016 to 2017/2018, approved for 2015/2016 and acknowledged for the financial years 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 by the Supervisory Board of Wincor Nixdorf on 23 September 2015,

6

PwC

• Forecasting figures for Wincor Nixdorf and its subsidiaries for the financial year 2015/2016, based on the unaudited interim financial statements for the first 9 month of the financial year 2015/2016 as well as adjusted plan for the years 2016/17 and 2017/18, all acknowledged by Supervisory Board of Wincor Nixdorf on 27 July 2016,

• Comparison of planned/actual data of Wincor Nixdorf based on the management reports for the financial years 2012/2013 to 2014/2015,

• Presentations and results of discussions with relevant contact persons at Wincor Nixdorf and Diebold or Diebold Inc. concerning synergies,

• Joint statement of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board of Wincor Nixdorf AG, pursuant to § 27 of the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act (Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetz – WpÜG), in respect of the offer (consisting of cash component and Diebold Inc. shares) presented by Diebold, Inc. and

• Other documents and information relevant to the valuation procedure.

5. Further information was provided to us by the Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf and employees nominated by the board. The Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf and the management of Diebold have provided us with a written statement that all material information and explanations given to us in connection with the preparation of our expert opinion are both complete and correct.

6. A major focus of our investigation was to verify the plausibility of the financial planning figures. We have not conducted individual audits with reference to §§ 316 et. seq. HGB. These were not part of our engagement.

7. We performed our valuation in accordance with the German valuation IDW S 1 2008 guideline established by the Institute of Public Auditors in Germany. In accordance with this standard, we determined the objectified business value of Wincor Nixdorf as an independent expert.

8. The expert opinion has been prepared exclusively for internal use by Wincor Nixdorf as well as contribution towards the contractual report to be issued by the contractual parties. Internal use also includes written and verbal reports to shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf as well as the shareholder’s option of inspection of the expert opinion in connection with the upcoming extraordinary general shareholders’ meeting. In addition, the expert opinion can be used in connection with a possible subsequent legal procedure as well as the reference required by the court appointed auditor within the scope of the verification of appropriateness of the cash compensation and recurring compensation in accordance with § 293b.1 AktG. The expert opinion may not be published, duplicated or used for any purpose other than those mentioned above. Without our prior written consent, this may not be forwarded to third parties for any purposes other than those mentioned above. Consent will not be denied for undue reasons.

9. This valuation and our responsibilities, including responsibilities towards third parties, are governed by the “General Engagement Terms” as at 1 January 2002, which are attached to this expert opinion.

7

PwC

02 Principles and methods of valuation

I. Basics of the valuation

10. According to IDW S 1 as amended in 2008, the value of a business is determined by the future benefits the business will generate on the basis of the key success factors inherent to the business at the time of valuation. The key success factors comprise factors such as the products, market position, organization, management, employees as well as the innovative capacity of the business. Assumed that merely financial objectives are pursued, the value of a business is determined by the capacity of the business to generate financial surpluses for the shareholders through the combination of all factors that influence the earnings potential.

11. The value of a business may be determined by either the discounted earnings method or the discounted cash flow method. Both methods are basically equivalent since they share the same theoretical basis (capitalization of future benefits) and will lead to identical results given the same financing premises and therefore net financial surpluses accruing to shareholders. In the present case we used the discounted earnings method to determine the business value.

12. Both methods first determine the present value of the financial surpluses generated by the assets essential for the business (operating assets). Assets (including liabilities) that could be separated from the business and sold without affecting the actual purpose of the business are classified as non-operating assets and valued separately. Therefore, the value of a business generally equals the sum of the present values of financial surpluses that can be derived from the operating and non-operating assets.

13. Predicting future cash flows is the core problem during every valuation process. Usually historic profitability is used as a base to estimate future financial planning figures. During the valuation process, only financial surpluses should be considered that result from specific measures that have already been initiated, or that originate from a sufficiently documented and substantiated business concept as at the valuation date.

14. The principles of the IDW S 1 as amended in 2008 distinguish between real and pseudo synergy effects. Real synergy effects are surpluses that can only be materialized through the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement. Pseudo synergy effects can be implemented with numerous partners and without real synergies would thus include measures that would not be executable without concluding the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement. On the other hand, pseudo synergy effects include the synergies expected from measures that can be executed even without the contract between the companies. Only pseudo synergy effects should be considered in the valuation and only if they are allotted to the valuation object

8

PwC

15. In determining the value of a business, it is generally assumed that all available financial surpluses resulting from a documented business concept as at the valuation date will be distributed, subject to any applicable legal restrictions. Retained earnings as well as their use must be taken into account when determining the net earnings to shareholders.

16. In order to value a business, the projected future financial surpluses need to be discounted to the valuation date using an appropriate interest rate (discount rate). The discount rate serves to measure the series of expected financial surpluses against a potential alternative investment.

17. Due to the relevance of personal income taxes to the business value, it is necessary to characterize the tax situation of shareholders in the framework of objectified business valuations. In case of legally and contractually motivated valuations within the meaning of IDW S 1 as amended in 2008, the standardization is based, in accordance with long-standing legal practice and valuation experience, on the tax situation of a domestic taxpayer, subject to full taxation. To this end, appropriate assumptions regarding the personal tax charge on net earnings generated by the company to be valued and the alternative investment must be made.

18. If it is beneficial to sell the operating and non-operating assets rather than continue the business operations, the valuation must be based on the liquidation value of the business as well unless this is not possible on account of legal or factual limitations. In order to verify whether the liquidation value exceeds the business value, the liquidation value of Wincor Nixdorf was roughly determined as at the valuation date and compared with the business value determined by us according to the discounted earnings discount method.

19. In the framework of valuation procedures, the net asset value is not considered.

20. The previously explained valuation procedures and frameworks are today accepted in both theory and practice and acknowledged in the court of law.

II. Reasonable cash compensation pursuant to § 305 AktG

21. A domination and profit and loss transfer agreement must amongst others include the obligation of the other party to the contract to on demand of an outside shareholder acquire the shares in return for an appropriate cash compensation defined in the agreement (§ 305(1) AktG). In the present case, the draft of the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement proposes an exit compensation (§ 305(2) no. 3 AktG).

22. According to the knowledge of financial studies, jurisdiction (compare BVerfG decision dated 27 April 1999 1BvR 1613/94; DB 1999, page 1695) and the valuation practice, the business value is the correct basis for determining the cash compensation as per § 305 AktG. Thus, the business value as a whole needs to be considered. This will therefore correspond to the postulate of compensation at full value of shares developed by the jurisdiction. Therefore, the business value of Wincor Nixdorf has to be determined including all subsidiaries.

9

PwC

23. When deducing the cash compensation for shares of a listed company, pursuant to § 305(1) AktG, the share price as fair value of a share has to be taken into consideration. If the share price does indeed represent the fair value has to be evaluated by case. Special care has to be taken if there are few outstanding shares or non-financial factors are distorting the share price. In these cases, individual financial performance is not necessarily correlated to fair value.

III. Reasonable recurring compensation pursuant to § 304 AktG

24. Pursuant to § 304(1) sentence 1 AktG, a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement must provide for a reasonable offset for the outside shareholders by way of a recurring payment related to their shares in the share capital (recurring compensation). According to § 304(2) sentence 1 AktG, at least the annual payment per share, which could probably be distributed as an average profit per share according to the previous earnings situation of the company and its future earnings prospects under consideration of appropriate depreciations and fair value adjustments, however without a retention of other profits, should be assured as compensation payment.

25. The discounted earnings value based on the corporate financial planning figures considers with regard to interest effects the expected payments between company and shareholders. For companies with positive annual financial results, these are the expected dividend payout to shareholders. With respect to a normalized annual recurring compensation, the legislative body does not relate the payment obligation to the expected earnings that vary year by year, but refers to the average amount per share that could probably be distributed under consideration of appropriate depreciations and fair value adjustments, however without retention of other earnings. The determination of an average amount per share should thus consider the volatility of profits or losses, but be converted into a uniform average amount per share.

10

PwC

03 Description of the subject of the valuation

I. Legal situation

26. Wincor Nixdorf has its registered office in Paderborn. The Company is entered in the commercial register under HRB 6864. Its domestic business address is Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1, 33106 Paderborn, Germany.

27. The current articles of association of Wincor Nixdorf are dated 18 February 2004 and were last amended by a resolution adopted on 25 January 2016.

28. According to its articles of association, the corporate purpose of Wincor Nixdorf consists in managing a group of domestic and foreign companies in which it holds equity interests and that operate in research, development, production, sales, the installation and leasing of products and solutions for the electronic processing and transmission of information and other innovative technology systems, as well as in the provision of consultancy services, training and support services for such business. The Company may itself operate in the aforementioned areas or restrict its activities to the management of its holdings.

29. The Company may conduct any business or undertake any actions that are appropriate for the direct or indirect fulfillment of its corporate purpose. In this regard, the Company may found, take over or acquire an interest in other companies. The Company may set up branches under the same or a different business name within or outside of Germany.

30. The fiscal year of Wincor Nixdorf differs from the calendar year and commences on 1 October and ends on 30 September.

31. The historical development of the Company into what is today Wincor Nixdorf can be summarized as follows:

32. The origins of the Company go back to the computer pioneer and business founder Heinz Nixdorf who formed Nixdorf Computer AG in 1952. By the middle of the 1980s, he had developed his company into the fourth largest computer group in Europe.

33. Four years after the death of Heinz Nixdorf, Nixdorf Computer AG was taken over by Siemens AG in 1990 and has been trading under the name “Siemens-Nixdorf Informationssysteme AG” since then. This company included the business areas “Solutions for the Retail Industry” and “Solutions for Financial Institutions”.

34. 1998 saw the formation of the company Siemens Nixdorf Retail and Banking Systems GmbH, which, as a wholly-owned subsidiary of Siemens-Nixdorf, further expanded its activities in the retailing and banking sectors.

11

PwC

35. In 1999, Siemens Nixdorf Retail and Banking Systems GmbH was bought by Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR) and Goldman Sachs Capital Partners and carved out of the Siemens Group. Today’s Wincor Nixdorf was originally formed under its articles of association of 2 July 1999 under the business name “AB 9916 Vermögensverwaltungs GmbH” in the legal form of a limited liability company with its registered office in Munich, and began trading as an independent company as of 1 October 1999. In the same year, its business name was changed to “Wincor Nixdorf 1. Beteiligungsgesellschaft mbH” and its registered office was moved to Paderborn (“Wincor” is an artificial name deriving from “Win” and “Core”). In 2000 the business name was changed to “WINCOR NIXDORF Holding GmbH“.

36. On 5 May 2004 the Company was transformed into a stock corporation trading under the business name “Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft”. Since 19 May 2004, its shares have been traded in the Prime Standard segment of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange.

37. Today, Wincor Nixdorf is represented in 42 countries through its own subsidiaries and in over 90 countries through partner companies.

38. On 17 October 2015, Wincor Nixdorf released an ad hoc disclosure stating that it was in merger talks with Diebold Inc., a US competitor in the banking segment, and that on 24 September 2015 a term sheet had already been agreed with regard to the key data of a possible merger by way of a voluntary takeover offer. The ad hoc disclosure also announced that the consideration of EUR 52.50 per share would consist of a combination of cash and Diebold Inc. stock (measured as at 18 November 2015 as announced later). On 23 November 2015, a business combination agreement – approved by the Supervisory Board of Wincor Nixdorf – was concluded between Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf. The conclusion of the agreement and the breakdown of the consideration consisting of a cash component (EUR 38.98) and 0.434 Diebold Inc. shares (EUR 13.52 as at 18 November 2015) were announced in a further ad hoc disclosure issued on the same day. On 5 February 2016, Diebold Inc. published the offer document and submitted it to the Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf, which passed on the document to the Wincor Nixdorf Supervisory Board and to the Group Works Council of the German subsidiary on the same day. The Board of Directors and Supervisory Board reviewed the takeover offer and issued a joint substantiated statement in accordance with § 27(1) of the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act (Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetz, WpÜG), in which they recommended that the shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf accept the takeover offer. The acceptance period for the takeover offer began with the publication of the offer document on 5 February 2016 and ended at midnight (CET) on 22 March 2016. On 24 March 2016, Diebold Inc. announced that, having acquired 68.9% of the shares, it had exceeded the minimum acceptance threshold (in the amount of 67.6%). The Diebold voluntary public takeover offer was therefore effective, but remained subject to anti-trust authority approval. The additional acceptance period began on 30 March 2016 and ended at midnight (CET) on 12 April 2016. On 8 April 2016, Diebold Inc. and Diebold announced that they would seek to conclude a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement after the offer is closed. A decision in this regard will be made by the Wincor Nixdorf general shareholders meeting that is scheduled to take place on 26 September 2016. On 15 April 2016, Diebold Inc. announced that the additional acceptance period would end at midnight (CET) on 12 April 2016 as planned. 22,876,760 Wincor Nixdorf shares were submitted by the end of the additional acceptance period. In addition, proxy voting rights in respect of 241,324 Wincor Nixdorf were to be allocated to Diebold Inc. pursuant to § 30 WpÜG.

39. After the completion of the takeover offer the number of shares that are attributable to Diebold is expected to correspond to about 69.9% of the share capital and –after deducing Wincor Nixdorf’s treasury shares– about 76.7% voting rights.

12

PwC

40. In fiscal year 2015/2016 the following relevant changes in the Group occurred:

• On 14 March 2016, Wincor Nixdorf announced that with retroactive effect from 1 January 2016, it had acquired a majority of the shares (51% of the shares) of the company Projective NV, Brussels, Belgium („Projective NV“), a company specializing in program and project management for the financial services sector. In the meantime, the share amounted to 53.1%.

• In the current fiscal year, the Wincor Nixdorf cashless payments unit (AEVI) was carved out of the existing structure to enable a partner to acquire a stake in it (for further details about AEVI cf. 3. III. 1). On 11 May 2016, Wincor Nixdorf announced that it had found a partner in the form of HPE Growth Capital who is investing in AEVI. HPE Growth Capital initially acquired 9.8% of the shares at a price of EUR 10m. This was followed by a capital increase that resulted in a dilution of the stake held by Wincor Nixdorf and consequently in HPE Growth Capital holding a minority stake in AEVI of 10% with retroactive effect from 1 October 2015. In total, this lead to a cash inflow of EUR 20m. Another capital increase in the amount of EUR 10m is planned for August 2016. This will increase the minority stake by 5% up to 15%.

• Due to the Chinese state bodies, in 2016 Wincor Nixdorf decided to sell the majority of its Chinese corporation: the Chinese government decides that predominantly companies of which 50% or more are owned by Chinese corporations are allowed to supply the Chinese market with ATMs. In June 2016, Wincor Nixdorf sold a stake of its Chinese business activities to its Chinese partner Aisino Corporation, Peking, China (“Aisino“), which will hold a 51-percent majority stake in the joint venture in the future. Wincor Nixdorf will be a minority shareholder with a stake of 43.6%, with the remaining shares (5.4%) held by the management team of the Chinese businesses (this means Wincor Nixdorf Retail & Banking Systems (Shanghai) Co., Limited and Wincor Nixdorf Manufacturing (Shanghai) Co., Limited). The completion of the transaction is subject to approval by several closing conditions. According to Wincor Nixdorf, the joint company wants to tap into the banking and retail sector in China with solutions that are tailored to China’s regulatory requirements.

41. At the time the valuation was prepared, the structure of the Wincor Nixdorf group was as follows:

Source: Company data

13

PwC

42. At the time of the valuation, the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf amounted to EUR 33,084,988 and was divided into 33,084,988 no-par value bearer shares and with each share representing a pro-rata amount of EUR 1.00 of the share capital. On completion of our valuation procedure, the shares of Wincor Nixdorf are admitted to trading on the regulated market of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange (Prime Standard) (WKN A0CAYB / ISIN DE000A0CAYB2). Until 19 June 2016, the shares were included in the MDAX. The Company has been included in the SDAX since then.

43. Wincor Nixdorf currently holds, indirectly, 3,268,777 Wincor Nixdorf shares (approx. 9.88%) as treasury shares. (“Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Stock”). In accordance with a Blocked Account Agreement entered into between Diebold, Wincor Nixdorf, Wincor Nixdorf Facility GmbH and the custodian bank which holds the Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Stock in safekeeping (the “Wincor Nixdorf Custodian”), the Wincor Nixdorf Custodian undertook (i) not to transfer the Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Stock held in the securities account to another securities account maintained by Wincor Nixdorf, Wincor Nixdorf Facility GmbH, or a third party and (ii) not to execute any order issued by Wincor Nixdorf or Wincor Nixdorf Facility GmbH to sell or transfer the Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Stock (including, for the avoidance of doubt, by way of the acceptance of the takeover offer).

44. By a resolution adopted by the general shareholders meeting of Wincor Nixdorf held on 20 January 2014, the Board of Directors was authorized to increase the share capital of Wincor Nixdorf on one or more occasions up to EUR 16,542,494 in total until 19 January 2019 with the approval of the Supervisory Board through the issuance of new no-par value bearer shares against a consideration in cash or in kind. Shareholders are to be guaranteed subscription rights. The Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf is nevertheless authorized, with the approval of the Supervisory Board, to

(1) exclude fractional amounts from shareholder subscription rights.

(2) exclude shareholder subscription rights if the issue price is not substantially lower than the market price. However, this authorization is subject to the stipulation that the total number of shares issued under the exclusion of subscription rights pursuant to § 186(3) sentence 4 of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz, AktG) does not exceed 10% of the share capital at the time a resolution is adopted or — if less — at the time the authorization is exercised. Since the granting of the authorization, that is, from 20 January 2014, any shares and rights conferring an entitlement to subscribe shares of the Company issued or sold under the exclusion of subscription rights pursuant to or in accordance with § 186(3) sentence 4 AktG are to be applied toward this limit of 10% of the share capital.

(3) exclude the subscription rights of shareholders in the event of the issuance of shares for purposes such as the acquisition (directly or indirectly) of enterprises, parts of enterprises or equity interests in enterprises and with the exclusion of subscription rights in such case limited to no more than 20% of the share capital of the Company at the time a resolution is adopted or — if less — at the time the authorization is exercised.

45. However, the aforementioned authorizations to exclude subscription rights are subject to the stipulation that the total number of shares issued under the exclusion of subscription rights pursuant to or in the relevant application of § 186(3) AktG since the granting of such authorizations, that is, since 20 January 2014, on the basis of these or other authorizations to issue shares of the Company or rights conferring an entitlement to subscribe shares of the Company, does not exceed 20% in total of the share capital at the time a resolution is adopted or — if less — at the time the authorization is exercised.

14

PwC

46. The share capital of Wincor Nixdorf is conditionally increased by up to EUR 10,000,000.00 divided into 10,000,000 no-par value bearer shares. The conditional capital increase serves the purposes of conferring option rights or obligations under the relevant option terms to the holders of warrants attached to participatory certificates and/or to bonds or conversion rights or obligations under the relevant terms of convertible bond terms to the holders of convertible participatory certificates and/or convertible bonds issued by Wincor Nixdorf or a controlled group enterprise within the meaning of § 17 AktG on the basis of the resolution adopted by the general shareholders meeting of Wincor Nixdorf on 21 January 2013 under agenda item 7 a) granting authorization until 20 January 2018. The new shares are to be issued at a warrant or conversion price to be determined in accordance with the authorization resolution described above. The conditional capital increase will only be implemented in the event of the issuance of participatory certificates with warrants or conversion rights or bonds with warrants or conversion rights and only to the extent that the holders of the participatory certificates with warrants or conversion rights exercise the warrants or conversion rights or holders of participatory certificates or bonds obliging their holder to exercise warrants or conversion rights fulfill their warrant/conversion obligations and conditional capital is required under the terms of participatory certificates with warrants or conversion obligations or under the terms of bonds with warrants or conversion obligations. New shares issued as a result of the exercise of warrant or conversion rights participate in profits from the start of the fiscal year in which they were created. If issued before the annual general meeting, the new shares also participate in the profits for the preceding fiscal year. The Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf is authorized to determine further details pertaining to the implementation of the conditional capital increase with the approval of the Supervisory Board. The Supervisory Board of Wincor Nixdorf is further authorized to modify the wording of Article 4(8) of the articles of association to conform to the respective issuance of shares for subscription as well as to implement all other related adjustments in this regard such as only pertain to wording. The foregoing applies accordingly in the event that there is no exercise of authorization to issue participatory certificates with warrants and conversion rights or bonds with warrants or conversion rights following the expiry of the authorization period as well as in the event that no use is made of conditional capital following the expiry of the periods of time set for the exercise of warrant or conversion rights. At the time of the valuation neither Wincor Nixdorf nor any controlled enterprise within the meaning of § 17 AktG had issued any such share-related securities or warrants.

47. The share capital of Wincor Nixdorf is conditionally increased by up to EUR 1,654,249.00 divided into 1,654,249 no-par value bearer shares. This conditional capital increase solely serves the purpose of granting stock options to members of the Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf as well as the executive management bodies of subordinated domestic and foreign affiliated enterprises, as well as to other senior executives and employees of Wincor Nixdorf and their subordinated affiliated enterprises as specified in greater detail in the authorization resolution adopted by the general shareholders meeting held on 20 January 2014 and as specified in greater detail in the authorization resolution adopted by the general shareholders meeting held on 20 January 2014 in the version amended (subject to entry in the commercial register) by a resolution of the general shareholders meeting adopted on 25 January 2016. It will be implemented only insofar as the holders of stock options exercise their right to subscribe shares of Wincor Nixdorf and the Company does not provide a consideration in the form of cash or treasury shares. The new shares participate in profits from the start of the fiscal year in which they were created through their issuance. If issued before the annual general meeting, the new shares also participate in the profits for the preceding fiscal year. Under the terms of the general agreement, Wincor Nixdorf has undertaken that, until the expiry of the additional acceptance period (or until the expiry of the sell-out period in the event that a sell-out right has been established in accordance with § 39c of the German Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act (Wertpapiererwerbs- und Übernahmegesetz, WpÜG), all stock options exercised under the Wincor Nixdorf stock option plans can only be settled by way of payment in cash.

15

PwC

48. In total, Wincor Nixdorf has issued 2,684,455 stock options under several stock option plans as at 30 June 2016.

49. The shareholder structure of Wincor Nixdorf at the time of the valuation was as follows.

Shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG	Number of shares		[in %] of total
Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA		22,876,760		69.1	%
Other Shareholders		6,939,451		21.0	%
Wincor Nixdorf Treasury Shares		3,268,777		9.9	%
Total		33,084,988		100.0	%

Source: Company data

50. After the deduction of the company’s own shares, also known as treasury shares, there are 29,816,211 shares outstanding. Thus, Diebold holds a stake of 76.7% of the outstanding shares.

16

PwC

II. Tax situation

51. Wincor Nixdorf is registered with the Paderborn tax office under tax number 339/5884/0020.

52. The initial tax circumstances of Wincor Nixdorf at the time of the valuation were as follows (overview):

             Entities in tax group (sales tax and income tax)

Source: Company data, PwC analysis

17

PwC

53. The Company is the consolidated tax group parent of a consolidated tax group for value added tax purposes comprising the following companies:

• WINCOR NIXDORF International GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Technology GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Security GmbH,

• Wincor Nixdorf Services GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Facility GmbH,

• Wincor Nixdorf Dienstleistungs GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Manufacturing GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Retail Consulting GmbH,

• IP Management GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Banking Consulting GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Business Administration Center GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Global IT Operations GmbH,

• Wincor Nixdorf Logistics GmbH,

• Prosystems IT GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Customer Care GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Facility Services GmbH and

• WINCOR NIXDORF Retail Services GmbH.

54. In addition, the Company is the consolidated tax group parent of a consolidated tax group formed for trade and corporation tax purposes with WINCOR NIXDORF International GmbH. WINCOR NIXDORF International GmbH is in turn the consolidated tax group parent of a consolidated tax group formed for trade and corporation tax purposes with:

• WINCOR NIXDORF Technology GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Security GmbH,

• Wincor Nixdorf Services GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Facility GmbH,

• Wincor Nixdorf Dienstleistungs GmbH,

18

PwC

• WINCOR NIXDORF Manufacturing GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Retail Consulting GmbH,

• IP Management GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Banking Consulting GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Business Administration Center GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Global IT Operations GmbH,

• Wincor Nixdorf Logistics GmbH,

• Prosystems IT GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Customer Care GmbH,

• WINCOR NIXDORF Facility Services GmbH and

• WINCOR NIXDORF Retail Services GmbH.

55. As in previous years, the Tax Office for Group and Large Company Audits (Finanzamt für Groß- und Konzernbetriebsprüfung) Detmold is conducting an audit with respect to corporation tax, trade tax and value added tax. In the case of tax group company WINCOR NIXDORF International, an external tax audit concerning corporation tax, trade tax and value added tax for fiscal year 2013/14 has also been initiated.

56. As at 1 October 2015, the tax loss carryforwards of Wincor Nixdorf were as shown in the table below:

Tax loss carryforwards as of 30 September 2015

		Tax loss carryforwards
Company	Registered office	[in mEUR]
Wincor Nixdorf Soluçõces em Tecnologia da Informaçã Ltda.	Atibaia/São Paulo (Brazil)		11,7
Wincor Nixdorf Retail & Banking Systems (Shanghai) Co. Ltd.	Shanghai (China)		10,2
WN CZ RETAIL SOLUTIONS s.r.o.	Prague (Czech Republic)		3,7
LLC WINCOR NIXDORF	Kiev (Ukraine)		1,9
Wincor Nixdorf Canada Inc.	Mississauga/Ontario (Canada)		1,8
LLC WINCOR NIXDORF	Moscow (Russia)		1,4
Other	—		0,2
Total			30,9

Source: Audit report of Wincor Nixdorf as of 30 September 2015

57. According to the audit report as of 30 September 2015 tax loss carryforwards in the amount of EUR 40.6m would arise for the domestic Wincor Nixdorf consolidated tax group. The corporation tax loss carryforwards in the amount of EUR 14.0m and the trade tax loss carryforwards in the amount of EUR 26.6m on the part of the domestic Wincor Nixdorf consolidated tax group were, according to management, completely consumed to offset taxable asset contribution gains with retroactive effect from 30 September 2015. The taxable asset contribution gains resulted from the carve-out and transfer of the business of Wincor Nixdorf Logistics GmbH to its newly-formed subsidiary, Wincor Nixdorf Global Logistics GmbH. The hidden reserves disclosed in this connection will be depreciated over a period of 15 years.

19

PwC

III. Economic background

1. Business operations

58. The Wincor Nixdorf Group comprises two operating segments, Banking and Retail, and supports the efforts of retail banks and the retail industry to continually improve business processes through the use of reliable information technology. The solutions offered by Wincor Nixdorf focus mainly on the interface between companies and their customers.

59. The Banking segment offering covers hardware, software, IT services and consulting services. ATMs, cash recycling systems, automated teller safes and transaction terminals are key elements of the hardware portfolio. Besides software for the operating systems, Wincor Nixdorf offers banks software that enables them to manage processes throughout all distribution channels. Products for postal companies also fall within the Banking segment.

60. In the Retail segment, Wincor Nixdorf also offers hardware, software, IT services and consulting services. Key elements are programmable EPOS systems or self-checkout systems for the checkout area. The software portfolio allows the entire control of all processes and systems within the branch. The same hardware products and solutions are also offered for the needs of service station operators and also come under the Retail segment.

61. Wincor Nixdorf differentiates the fields hardware and software/services. The field of software/services is internally differentiated in Software, Professional Services, Product Related Services, as well as Outsourcing and Managed Services. We have analyzed the business of Wincor Nixdorf on this level of detail. By way of information, the segments are described briefly below:

• The hardware segment includes the design, the manufacturing and the distribution of products such as cashier- and self check-out systems, ATMs and cash recyclers.

• In the segment Software Wincor Nixdorf offers software packages that can be used to operate bank branches and retail stores. The aim is not so much to intervene in the core IT structure, but rather to bridge the interface between the operational branch and the core IT processes with customized software solutions.

• Professional Services provide consulting services that incur particularly during the planning, implementing and operating of the offered IT services and software rollouts.

• Product Related Services include services that occur in the course of servicing and maintenance of delivered hardware during the product life cycle.

• Managed Services go beyond mere maintenance and repair. Here Wincor Nixdorf manages hardware and/or IT processes, ensures their functionality and controls adjacent processes (e.g. cash management).

20

PwC

• When it comes to Outsourcing, Wincor Nixdorf takes over not only individual processes but also equips all stores with its own hardware, operates associated hardware and software with its own resources (e.g. data centers) and controls all relevant processes.

62. Cashless payment is one Wincor Nixdorf’s of growth areas. The business unit AEVI is associated with the Retail segment and focuses on the integration of payments across all channels and currencies into a single access. Thereby it serves as a link between both banks and merchants, as well as between merchants and consumers. The focus is on the B2B app store, which allows merchants to choose from a variety of applications based on Android to personalize their devices and align them with the needs of their customers. The Multi-Channel POS Tablet “Albert” complements the range of AEVI and offers services from the warehouse management and the control of back-office processes to payment processing via credit card or Near Field Communication (NFC) solutions. The device runs on Android and is used by banks and their customers in the catering and hotel industry as well as the retail industry to improve customer loyalty.

63. The Wincor Nixdorf Group has production sites in Germany and China. Research and development are primarily conducted in Germany, Poland, Singapore and China.

64. In fiscal year 2014/2015, the Wincor Nixdorf Group achieved total net sales under IFRS of EUR 2,427m, down some EUR 42m and therefore down some 2 percentage points on the figure for the previous fiscal year.

65. Of that figure, the Banking segment accounts for some 65% with the Retail segment accounting for the remaining about 35%.

Source: Consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

21

PwC

66. By business stream, about 58% can be allocated to the software/services business area, while the other 42% was generated in the hardware area.

Source: Consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

67. About 45% of the revenue from sales was achieved in Europe (excluding Germany), with the remainder spread across Germany (23%), Asia/Pacific/Africa (20%), and America (12%) as shown in the following graphic:

Source: Consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

68. The earnings before interest, taxes and amortization of goodwill (“EBITA”) adjusted for restructuring effects amounted to EUR 102m in fiscal year 2014/2015.

69. As at 30 September 2015, the Wincor Nixdorf Group employed 9,100 people (previous fiscal year: 9,198).

22

PwC

70. Since the second half of fiscal year 2014/2015, Wincor Nixdorf has been implementing a program called “Delta” aimed at restructuring and repositioning. The aim is to accelerate the process of shifting the focus toward becoming a software and IT service company with attractive margins and with an innovative, profitable hardware business. The program consists of 7 measures that can be defined as follows:

1) Considerable acceleration of growth in the software business and associated Professional Services, e.g. increasing capacity in software distribution and expansion of R&D in the software segment.

2) Expansion of high-end IT services for operations management such as Managed Services and Outsourcing, e.g. achieving operational excellence in the global delivery process and growth/improved profitability of individual regions, areas and projects.

3) Fundamental realignment of hardware strategy, e.g. partnership strategies.

4) Carve-out of business unit for cashless payment.

5) Program for price Optimization, e.g. improving the margins and discipline in pricing.

6) Streamlining of administration costs.

7) Organizational support to implement changes.

71. The restructuring program “Delta” originally envisaged restructuring expenses of the order of EUR 120m, which resulted in EUR 80m being incurred in fiscal year 2014/2015 and EUR 40m planned for fiscal year 2015/2016. According to current forecasts, low outlays of just EUR 20m are anticipated for the current fiscal year. The positive effect of the restructuring program should be fully felt as of fiscal year 2017/2018 and should contribute about EUR 120m p.a. to earnings (for further one-time effects see 4 II 1.)

2. Market and competition

a.) Macroeconomic development

72. Over recent years, the financial and sovereign debt crisis led to volatile and falling rates of growth in many economic regions, especially Europe. In its World Economic Outlook published in April, the International Monetary Fund (“IMF”) forecasts that gross domestic product (GDP) in Germany and Europe will remain at around 1.3% (Germany) and 1.8% (Europe) up to 2020. Following an increase to 2.5% by 2017, the rates of growth in the USA are forecast to fall to 2.0% over the long term. The economic development anticipated in the Asia-Pacific region, forecast to be approx. 5.5%, is down in comparison to 2010 (8.5%), but continues to be at a high level. GDP growth rates in China (2020: 6.0%) are expected to follow a similar course. For India the IMF forecasts a increasing GDP growth rate up to 7.7% in 2020. The other growth markets Brazil and Russia have exhibited wildly fluctuating growth rates in recent years. Downward trends are forecast both for Brazil (-3.8%) and Russia (-1.8%) in 2016. For the period from 2017 to 2020, the International Monetary Fund is predicting increasing positive growth rates of 2.0% for Brazil and 1.5% for Russia.

23

PwC

73. The following overview shows the changes to GDP (real) over the course of time in the regions relevant to Wincor Nixdorf as well as markets with high growth potential:

Changes in gross domestic product from 2013 to 2020 in %

GDP growth change [in %]	2013			2014			2015			2016E			2017E			2018E			2019E			2020E
Germany		0.4	%		1.6	%		1.5	%		1.5	%		1.6	%		1.4	%		1.3	%		1.3	%
Europe		0.5	%		1.2	%		0.9	%		1.2	%		1.8	%		1.8	%		1.9	%		1.8	%
USA		1.5	%		2.4	%		2.4	%		2.4	%		2.5	%		2.4	%		2.1	%		2.0	%
Asia and Pacific		5.7	%		5.4	%		5.3	%		5.2	%		5.2	%		5.2	%		5.4	%		5.4	%
Brazil		3.0	%		0.1	%		-3.8	%		-3.8	%		0.0	%		1.0	%		2.0	%		2.0	%
Russia		1.3	%		0.7	%		-3.7	%		-1.8	%		0.8	%		1.0	%		1.5	%		1.5	%
India		6.6	%		7.2	%		7.3	%		7.5	%		7.5	%		7.6	%		7.7	%		7.7	%
China		7.7	%		7.3	%		6.9	%		6.5	%		6.2	%		6.0	%		6.0	%		6.0	%
Total world		3.3	%		3.4	%		3.1	%		3.2	%		3.5	%		3.6	%		3.8	%		3.8	%

Source: IMF, PwC Analysis

b.) Market trends Banking and Retail

Overview

74. In conducting our market and competitive analysis, we focused on each of Wincor Nixdorf’s important sales markets and growth markets with large market potential in Banking and Retail. The analysis is performed on the markets of Germany, Europe excluding Germany, America and Asia-Pacific and the Middle East/Africa. The aim, then, is to attempt, where possible, to depict the varying developments corresponding to the demarcation of regions adopted by Wincor Nixdorf.

75. Statements on the development of the hardware area will be made with the aid of data on the number of shipments and the installed basis of ATMs in the banking sector or Electronic Points-of-Sales (“EPOS”) in retail. Shipments in this respect represent those units which were installed in the relevant year, and which may be regarded as an indicator for the sales of hardware. These may be replacement procurements for outdated units as well as the establishment of ATMs and EPOS devices at locations where previously no units were installed. The installed basis provides an idea of the current market volume. The change to it enables conclusions to be drawn on whether the markets in question are saturated or growing. The installed basis also enables us to derive the volume of devices for which services such as maintenance or upgrade services can be delivered.

76. Statements concerning the area of software and services will be largely derived from the anticipated IT expenditure of the banking sector and retailers.

Banking - Hardware

Global trends

24

PwC

77. The banking sector, particularly in Western Europe and North America, was negatively affected by the financial and sovereign debt crisis, from which it has still not fully recovered. Furthermore, the consequences of United Kingdom’s planned exit from the European Union are not yet fully clear. Considering the bank-specific framework, the reduction of costs, especially personnel costs, is therefore decisive for the competitiveness and profitability of banks. This is particularly true of the rivalry with the ever more popular so-called FinTech firms. In recent years, the banks’ cost optimization program has led to the closure of numerous branches accompanied by a corresponding reduction in personnel, while, on the other hand, this was partially offset by a larger number of ATMs with functions extending far beyond the mere provision of cash (high-end devices).

78. Alongside the cost reduction aspect, it is technological progress, with the greater integration of wireless communication devices, especially smartphones, that is perceived as being an important driver of global growth in the banking sector. But also the introduction of enhanced security standards for ATMs, such as authentication supported by biometric customer data (for example, by using finger/vein scanners or iris recognition), increases customers’ feeling of security, and can therefore constitute an additional growth trend.¹

79. Moreover, there are expectations of high growth in hardware business in the banking sector of the Asian economic region, resulting from the increase in income levels among the populations in that region. Another driver of growth is the geographical expansion to enable the rural population have access to cash supply. It is forecast that worldwide ATM purchases² in retail banking during the period from 2014 to 2019 will increase by approximately USD 2.4 billion to USD 13.1 billion, as can be seen from the following market forecast.³

Source: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019 (Ovum).

¹  Cf. TechNavio: Global Automated Teller Machine Market (2015), p. 41 ff.

²  This figure includes the capital expenditure as well as the costs for maintenance, network systems and the relevant ATM software.

³  Ovum: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019.

25

PwC

80. It is expected that the number of ATMs in use around the world will grow from some 3.0 million units to ca. 4.1 million units in 2020.¹ The regional-based changes in the banking hardware market are described below, and are based on the demarcation adopted by Wincor Nixdorf.

Banking Hardware

Shipments ATMs in thousand units	2015 Planned		2020 Planned		CAGR 15-20			Delta 15-20
Germany		6.4		5.3		-3.6	%		-1.1
Europe w/o Germany		67.5		75.5		2.2	%		7.9
America		98.7		92.8		-1.2	%		-5.9
APAC & MEA		297.5		384.6		5.3	%		87.1
Total world		470.1		558.2		3.5	%		88.0
Installed base ATMs in thousand units	2014 Actual		2020 Planned		CAGR 14-20			Delta 14-20
Germany		58.6		58.9		0.1	%		0.3
Europe w/o Germany		591.5		633.3		1.1	%		41.8
America		785.5		819.8		0.7	%		34.3
APAC & MEA		1,573.2		2,604.3		8.8	%		1031.1
Total world		3,008.8		4,116.4		5.4	%		1107.5

Source: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (RBR).

Germany

81. Germany is forecast to see ATM purchases increase by around USD 80 million to USD 720 million (CAGR: 2.5%). By way of contrast, it is anticipated that, during the period from 2015 to 2020, the number of shipments of ATMs in Germany will fall from a total of 1 k units to around 5 k in 2020. In this respect, it is assumed that the number of installed units will remain largely stable at approximately 59 k units during the period from 2014 to 2020.² The market is in a very mature phase, in which around 97% of shipments are replacement procurements or the optimization of existing units. So it is anticipated that by 2020, around 30% of all ATMs installed in Germany will feature cash recycling functions.³ This development confirms the trend of German banks towards closing branches, and compensating for this by installing high-grade devices with more functions (high-end devices).

Europe excluding Germany

82. The demand for cash in Europe remains as high as ever.⁴ Therefore, despite the advanced maturity of the European banking market, it is anticipated that the number of installed units will increase in the period from 2014 to 2020, from approximately 42 k units to around 633 k units for Europe excluding Germany. This corresponds to an average annual growth rate of 1.1% during this period. Furthermore, the number

¹  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015).

²  The analysis of the market studies at hand is based on the existing actual figures, and continues through to the end of the relevant planning horizon. This may mean there is a difference to the periods stated in the text. In the analysis of the development of shipments within the regions, the figures for 2015 are target figures.

³  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015).

⁴  Discussion Paper Deutsche Bundesbank No 13/2014: Consumer cash usage: a cross-country comparison with payment survey data (2014), p. 3.

26

PwC

of shipments for the period from 2015 to 2020 will increase by 2.2% on average per year, to around 76 k units in 2020.¹ Similarly to the situation in Germany, shipments in the rest of Europe are more down to a cost-pressure-induced optimization of the business model with the aid of cash recycling ATMs, rather than an expansion of ATMs.

83. The annual average rate of growth of shipments in Eastern Europe in the period from 2015 to 2020 with 2.5% is higher than the equivalent rate in Western Europe (1.3%). This growth is also the result of the recovery effects in the wake of the Crimean crisis. In the Ukraine, some 5,600 ATMs were removed in 2014 alone (Russia: 900). Particularly large growth in shipments is expected for Eastern Europe in 2016 (5.2%). The region of Europe excluding Germany is expected to see negative growth rates in shipments of ATMs for the period from 2017 to 2020. For the period from 2014 to 2019, the market for ATMs is forecast to grow from around USD 0.5 billion to USD 2.9 billion (CAGR: 3.5%).²

Americas

84. A similar trend compared to Germany is also evident in North America. Alternative payment methods are being increasingly used in both the USA and in Canada. Combined with the closure of many branches, this is leading to an annual average downturn in shipments of -5.0% in the USA and -6.5% in Canada between 2015 and 2020. The maturity of both markets, and the fact that many ATMs in the USA have to be replaced in response to the new EMV standards³, allows the conclusion to be drawn that orders for ATM orders are almost exclusively the result of maintenance investments. The stock of ATMs in North America is expected to remain relatively stable, at over half a million units across the period under review. The revenues from installation, repairs and maintenance are expected to grow in North America by USD 0.8 billion to USD 4.7 billion in the period from 2014 to 2019 (CAGR: 3.9%).

85. Latin America is forecast to see average annual growth in the new installation of ATMs of 5.7% in the period from 2015 to 2020. This growth is particularly due to the banking market in Brazil. During this period, shipments in Brazil are expected to increase by around 9 k units to approximately 21 k units in 2020. This corresponds to a rise of just about 80% or an average of roughly 12% per year. However, the overall number of installed ATMs in Brazil is declining slightly, and will fall by around 7 k units to 157 k units (2014: 164 k).⁴ In Brazil too, these shipments are almost exclusively linked to cost-induced replacement investments (approximately 97%).⁵

86. For the overall America hardware market the expected average annual growth rate is about -1.2% (2015–2020) for shipments and 0.7% (2014-2020) for the installed base. The revenues from installation, repairs and maintenance are expected to grow by USD 0.9 billion to USD 5.3 billion in the period from 2014 to 2019. This corresponds to an average annual growth rate of 3.9%.⁶

¹  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015). Germany is here too omitted from this analysis.

²  Ovum: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019 (2015).

³  EMV standards are security standards for payment transactions.

⁴  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015).

⁵  The rate 97% describes the portion of shipments replacing already existing systems due to obsolescence.

⁶  Ovum: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019 (2015).

27

PwC

Asia-Pacific and Middle East/Africa (APAC & MEA)

87. The forecast stable growth rates in GDP to 2020 – about 5.3% per year – make Asia-Pacific the strongest growing economic region in the world.¹ The disposable income of the population is also steadily increasing. The OECD predicts that by 2030, Asia will have 3.2 billion people or 66% of the “global middle class” totaling 4.9 billion people (2009: 28%). Asia is therefore also a crucial growth market for the banking sector. For example, in 2014 about 47.0% of all the world’s ATMs were installed in Asia. It is expected that this share will rise to 57.0% by 2020.

88. Significant influencing factor in this is the expected increase in the annual volume of cash withdrawals by about 44% from 2015 to 2020.² There is also great potential due to the low penetration of ATMs to date. The market for ATMs in the Asia-Pacific and MEA region is expected to grow by around USD 1.0 billion to USD 4.2 billion in the period from 2014 to 2019. This corresponds to an average annual growth rate of 5.4%. The average annual growth rate of the number of installed ATMs for this period is 8.8% for the Region Asia Pacific and MEA. It is expected that some 2.6 million ATMs will be installed in the Asia-Pacific and MEA region by 2020. This corresponds to approximately 385 k shipments in 2020.³ Increasing numbers of ATMs with additional functions, such as cash recycling, will also be installed in this economic region.

89. It is expected that the Asia-Pacific region will see an increase of the installed base of around 0.9 Million units to 2.3 Million units in the period from 2014 to 2020. This equals an average annual growth rate of 8.8%. The shipments are predicted to grow to ca. 346 k units in 2020 (CAGR 15-20: 5.1%). Accounting for about 50% of shipments, China is viewed as the most important market in the Asia-Pacific region in 2015.⁴ However, the regulatory rules of the Chinese government mean that the business operations of western companies are severely restricted. Significant growth opportunities are likewise expected for India. For example, it is predicted that, with 225 k installed ATMs, India has superseded Japan in 2015 as the second largest market. This is due, first and foremost, to an ever larger number of customers and a greater market penetration by ATMs, because these are being installed in shopping centers and gas stations. “White label” ATMs – ATMs with no bank logo – are driving this growth.⁵

90. In the Middle East/Africa region, high growth is predicted for shipments of ATMs, amounting to an average of 6.8% per year in the period from 2014 to 2020. Here, only about 50% of shipments constitute replacement investments. The growing efforts to supply the population with cash, and the growing demand by the population for cash, are decisive influencing factors. The number of installed ATMs is forecast to be about 260 k in 2020, a rise of around 100 k compared to 2014.⁶

91. Many banking markets are in a very mature state. This is especially true of the North American and Western European banking markets. So there is nothing to suggest that the installed basis will significantly increase in the coming years. In the main, shipments are the result of replacement

¹  Based on the data from the International Monetary Fund, cf. no. 72.

²  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015).

³  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015).

⁴  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015).

⁵  “White label” ATMs are owned by non-banking enterprises. Customers pay an additional charge for the transactions performed.

⁶  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015).

28

PwC

investments (e.g. USA 2016: 99%), made necessary due to technical limitations or new security standards. The cost optimizations targeted in the mature markets mean there is demand especially for ATMs with an enhanced range of functions (high-end products), in order to be able to continue to offer banking customers the widest range of services possible, while keeping the costs as low as possible. By way of contrast, the expectation is for shipments to grow strongly in the growth markets, largely located in the Asian-Pacific region as well as in the Middle East/Africa. Replacement investments therefore make up a much smaller proportion of shipments here (e.g. China 2016: 33%).

Banking – Software and Services

Global trends

92. It is forecast that the market for IT services in retail banking will grow on average by 4.7% annually in the period from 2014 to 2019, as can be seen from the following market forecast.

Source: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019 (Ovum).

93. The worldwide total expenditure in retail banking in 2019 is expected to amount to USD 157.6 billion.¹ The forecast for the entire banking sector is for worldwide IT expenditure to increase by EUR 67.5 billion to EUR 374.4 billion in 2019 (CAGR 14-19: 4.1%). High growth opportunities are identified particularly for software (CAGR 14-19: 7.2%) and consulting and integration services (CAGR 14-19: 5.5%).² Within IT expenditure, a budgetary shift towards software and services is therefore evident.

94. Within retail banking, the fast growing levels of expenditure are on online and mobile banking.³ As already mentioned in relation to hardware, the increasing cost pressures mean that banks are closing branches, while encouraging customers to make more use of online banking instead. With permanent online services, the banks are able to reduce their personnel costs, while simultaneously increasing their effectiveness and customer satisfaction levels. For the period from 2014 to 2019, the forecast is for annual growth rates of 6.9% for online banking and 7.2% for mobile banking.¹

¹  The analysis of IT expenditure also includes hardware expenditure, such as for ATMs and servers.

²  PAC (2015).

³  Ovum: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019 (2015).

¹  Ovum: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019 (2015).

29

PwC

95. The regional-based changes in the software and services market for banking are described below, and are based on the demarcation adopted by Wincor Nixdorf.

Germany

96. IT expenditure in Germany amounted to about USD 7.0 billion in 2014. Particularly high growth rates were previously apparent in expenditure for mobile banking and online banking. These areas are also expected to register the strongest growth over the short term, averaging 5.2% and 5.6% per year respectively (2014 to 2019). For the period from 2014 to 2019, the forecast is for IT expenditure in retail banking in Germany to increase by USD 1.2 billion² to USD 8.1 billion. This corresponds to an average annual growth rate of 3.2% per year. This means that Germany is falling short of the global average.³ This is bound up with the fact that the number of installed ATMs in Germany is anticipated to remain more or less unchanged in the period from 2014 to 2020, meaning that no substantial growth is expected for a country adequately supplied with high-grade services.⁴

Europe excluding Germany

97. With a market share of 32.8%, Europe is the second largest market after America (41.8%) (2014). Software is perceived as having large growth potential. In the analysis of Europe excluding Germany, it is expected that IT expenditure will amount to USD 41.2 billion in 2019, an increase of USD 7.0 billion compared to 2014 (CAGR 14-19: 3.8%). Important influencing factors come particularly in the form of the marketing opportunities of digital business models and enhanced customer loyalty.

America

98. While, with the growth rate predicted to be 0.7% for installed units in the hardware area, there is no forecast for high growth potential in the American banking market during the period from 2014 to 2020, it is expected that IT expenditure in the period from 2014 to 2019 will outperform the global trend. The expected average annual growth rate in the period from 2014 to 2019 is 4.8%. For the period from 2014 to 2019, the forecast is for IT expenditure in retail banking in America to increase by USD 13.7 billion to USD 66.1 billion.

99. The US market is the main driver of growth here, registering a volume of USD 43.8 billion (2014). The expectation is for the IT expenditure of US retail banks to increase to USD 55.6 billion in 2019. This corresponds to an average annual growth rate of 4.9% in the period from 2014 to 2019. Important factors in this respect include the fulfillment of new security standards and efforts towards exploiting digital and mobile marketing options. An increase in IT expenditure for retail banking is also expected in Latin America, and Brazil in particular. The prediction is for expenditure to rise in Latin America by USD 0.9 billion to USD 5.0 billion by 2019. Brazil is forecast to register an increase of USD 0.3 billion to USD 2.1 billion.

²  The difference compared to the illustrated figure is explained by rounding.

³  Ovum: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019 (2015).

⁴  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015).

30

PwC

Asia-Pacific and Middle East/Africa (APAC & MEA)

100. The growth forecast in software and services in the Asia-Pacific region and the Middle East/ Africa exceeds the global trend, but still falls below that of hardware (CAGR 14-20 of the installed units: 8.8%). Market studies forecast that, by 2019, IT expenditure will rise by around USD 10.4 billion to USD 42.2 billion, an increase of 32.5% compared to 2014 (CAGR: 5.8%). One particular driver of growth is the increasing expansion of banking business in response to strong customer demand. Within the region, there are some significant differences in the forecast growth rates for IT expenditure in retail banking.¹

101. China and India are expected to register growth rates of 7.7% and 7.4% respectively, clearly ahead of the global trend (4.7%). With IT expenditure totaling USD 7.6 billion in 2014, China remains ahead of Japan (USD 7.5 billion) as the largest market in the Asia-Pacific region. In keeping with the global trend, the highest growth rates in the Asia-Pacific region are in online banking (7.8%) and mobile banking (7.8%). In the period from 2014 to 2020, it is expected that the number of installed units increases by 930 k units, or 66.0%, to 2,350 k units. From this we can conclude that this region offers better potential for services in comparison to Europe and North America.

102. With an average annual growth rate of 5.9% for the period from 2014 to 2019, the economic region of the Middle East/Africa still remains ahead of Asia-Pacific with the highest relative growth potential for IT expenditure in retail banking sector. The forecast is for expenditure to increase by USD 1.9 billion to USD 7.8 billion in the period from 2014 to 2019.² However, in this respect the economic growth of the Middle East is exposed to huge fluctuations in the price of crude oil.

103. In common with the majority of sectors, retail banks are also seeking to market their products and services across all sales channels. This “omni-channeling” activity of the banks, combined with the advancement of digitization, greatly stimulates the use of mobile and online banking, meaning that high growth rates can be expected in these areas in particular. The high levels of competition among the retail banks, but also from the FinTech firms, mean that customer loyalty is becoming increasingly important. The result is the greater importance of subjects such as data security and the analysis of customer data, in order to ensure personalized advice including via user interfaces. This direction taken by the banks is also evident in the way they are focusing their IT expenditure.

Retail – Hardware

Global trends

104. The Internet of Things (“IoT”)³ is playing an increasingly significant role in everyday life, and is likewise becoming increasingly important in commerce. It is expected that machine-to-machine (“M2M”) connections will increase and – at 85% – practically double over the next four years.⁴ This development is

¹  Ovum: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019 (2015).

²  Ovum: Retail Banking Technology Spending Through 2019 (2015).

³  This means that the computer as an object of human attention will be replaced by “smart” devices that support human activities imperceptibly. The communication between two such devices is defined as Machine-to-Machine information exchange.

⁴  Ovum: 2016 Trends to Watch—Consumer Mobile Payments Services (2016), p. 8 et seqq.

31

PwC

associated with market potentials for mobile Points-of-Sales (“mPOS”) and other mobile payment systems.¹ It is therefore expected that the revenues generated with mPOS devices will experience an average annual growth rate of 9.6% up to an volume of 680 mUSD between 2014 and 2019. However, in this context this is a fall evident in the sales price per unit.

105. The growth rate of installed units for the global Electronic Point-of-Sale (“EPOS”) market is, by way of contrast, forecast much lower, as can be seen from the following market forecast.

Retail Hardware

Shipments EPOS in thousand units	2014 Actual		2020 Planned		CAGR 14-20			Delta 14-20
Germany		68.7		59.3		-2.4	%		-9.4
Europe w/o Germany		421.7		490.1		2.5	%		68.4
America		678.3		597.9		-2.1	%		-80.4
APAC & MEA		635.9		842.7		4.8	%		206.8
Total world		1,804.8		1,989.9		1.6	%		185.1
Installed base EPOS in thousand units	2014 Actual		2020 Planned		CAGR 14-20			Delta 14-20
Germany		560.4		560.2		0.0	%		-0.2
Europe w/o Germany		3,114.1		3,451.4		1.7	%		337.3
America		4,929.7		5,100.9		0.6	%		171.2
APAC & MEA		3,682.9		5,236.4		6.0	%		1553.5
Total world		12,287.1		14,348.8		2.6	%		2061.7

Source: Global EPOS and Self-Checkout 2015 (RBR).

106. Its expected annual growth rate is just 2.6% for the period from 2014 to 2020. This is largely the result of the decline in shipments of hardware in the retail sector in North America and Western Europe.

107. A basic distinction is made among three large customer groups for EPOS devices: General Merchandise with a market share of 31%, Food and non-Food (25%) and Hospitality (23%). The remaining 21% is classified as Other. In this context, Hospitality (3.3%) exhibits the highest average growth rate for the installed basis in the period from 2014 to 2019, ahead of Food and non-Food (2.8%). At 1.8%, the growth rate for the General Merchandise customer group is below the 2.6% average.²

108. High growth is currently identified in retail in the use of self-checkout systems (“SCO), where the checkout process is completely or partially up to the customer. Particular reasons for the increased use of self-checkout systems include lower personnel costs, avoidance of queuing and time savings for consumers. It is forecast that the global SCO market will more than double in size to USD 2.2 billion in the period from 2014 to 2019.³

¹  Mobile Point-of-Sales are smartphones, tablets or other wireless devices, which offer various services for the retail industry ranging from warehouse management and back-office processes to payment processing. As a result it is a substitute for EPOS in some degree.

²  RBR: Global EPOS and Self-Checkout (2015).

³  TechNavio: Global Self-Checkout Terminals Market 2015-2019 (2015), p. 6

32

PwC

Source: Global Self-Checkout Terminals Market 2015-2019 (TechNavio)

109. The regional-based changes forecast for the EPOS market in the retail industry are described below, and are based on the demarcation adopted by Wincor Nixdorf.

Germany

110. The recovery of the German economy following the financial and sovereign debt crisis continued in 2014, with GDP at (+1.6%). Within this environment, around 69 k EPOS units were installed during 2014, constituting growth of 11.3% compared to the preceding fiscal year. However, it is expected that the market will reach a mature state over the mid- to long-term. Following a slight increase over the medium term, it is anticipated that there will be no additional significant change to 2020 in the installed basis of 560 k units. On the other hand, there is expected to be an annual fall of -2.4% in shipments. This suggests that the new devices are primarily attributable to replacement investments. Numerous retailers decided based on their better economic situation to renew their technology.

Europe excluding Germany

111. In 2014, 29.9% of the worldwide EPOS units were installed in Europe. This makes the region the second largest market for EPOS units after America. Therefore, the number of shipments in Europe excluding Germany for the period from 2014 to 2020 is expected to increase by 2.5% annually, to around 490 k units in 2020. The number of installed units in Europe excluding Germany will rise to 3.4 million over the same period. (CAGR 14-20: 1.7%). Due to the improved economic development many retailers have chosen to renew their technology.

112. The expected developments within Europe vary significantly in this respect. For example, Western Europe is forecast to see strong growth in shipments, particularly during 2016 (9.3%) and 2017 (5.8%). It is then expected there will be a decline up to 2020, with the rate falling back to the level of 2015 (CAGR 14-20: 0.6%). There will also only be a moderate increase in the number of installed units, rising by around 111 k units to approximately 3,160 k units. Central and Eastern Europe, in contrast, are expected to see high growth potential. The economic downturn triggered by the Crimean crisis resulted in falling numbers of shipments in Central and Eastern Europe in 2015, particularly due to the sanctions imposed on Russia by the EU. Over the long term, market experts expect the market to recover again in Central and Eastern Europe, especially in Russia. There is expected to be an average annual growth rate of 5.7% for shipments and 5.3% in the number of installed EPOS units.

33

PwC

Americas

113. With a share of 51.2% (2014) and an average annual growth rate of 10.4% to 2019, America is the most important sales market in the mPOS market.¹ It is also expected that the use of mobile payment systems, such as Paypal, Apple Pay and Bitcoins, will significantly grow in the near future.² The forecast development of the mPOS market and mobile payment methods entails the decline in the development of the electronic point-of-sale market in America. It is expected, therefore, that the new installation of EPOS systems in America will fall by around 80 k units in the period from 2015 to 2020 to about 600 k units in 2020. This market development is primarily driven from within the USA respectively Canada. It is therefore expected that the numbers of shipments in the USA respectively Canada are in rapid decline (CAGR 14-20: -4.2% respectively -6.9%). It is predicted that the installed base in North America will decline by around -0.6% p.a. in the period from 2014 to 2020. For the same period the market in Latin America is expected to grow significantly (CAGR 14-20: 6.4%), so that a moderate growth of the installed base by ca. 0.2 million units to 5.1 million units is expected for the overall American market (CAGR 14-20: 0.6%).

114. The number of shipments of self-checkout systems in the USA in 2014 increased by 50% to around 8 k units in comparison to the preceding fiscal year. The main cause of the downturn was the end of the Wal-Mart roll-out in 2013. However, it is expected that the market will pick up again by 2018, returning to the level of 2013.³ In this context, America has the most developed market for self-checkout systems.

Asia-Pacific and Middle East/Africa (APAC & MEA)

115. Rising population income and the resulting expansion of an affluent middle class also offer tremendous growth opportunities for retail. A significant increase in consumer spending is expected in the largest Asian markets.⁴ Higher consumer spending also implies a positive forecast for the Hardware Point-of-Sale area. Whereas the market for global EPOS shipments grew on average by 1.6% in the period from 2014 to 2020, the anticipated growth in the Asian-Pacific and MEA market is 4.8% over the same period. It may be expected that the average annual growth rate of self-checkout systems will be in the double-digit range.

116. It is predicted that installed base of EPOS systems in Asia-Pacific will grow by about 1.4 million units to 4.7 million units in 2020 (CAGR 14-20: 5.8%). The number of shipments is anticipated to rise by an average of 4.1% p.a. to 745k units in the same period. In common with markets already analyzed in the retail segment, there is also huge growth discernible in Asia-Pacific for mobile point-of-sale terminal devices as well as other mobile payment options. It is expected that the market for mPOS devices will grow from USD 50 million to USD 90 million in the period from 2014 to 2019.⁵ This corresponds to an average annual growth of 12.5%. This makes Asia-Pacific the strongest growing market in this area.

¹  TechNavio: Global Mobile POS Systems Market 2015-2019 (2015), p. 30 et seqq.

²  Accenture: 2015 North America Consumer Digital Payments Survey (2015), p. 5 et seqq., cf. AT Kearney: The 2015 Retail Banking Radar - Time to Reinvent Your Banking Model (2015), p. 14.

³  RBR: Global EPOS and Self-Checkout (2015).

⁴  Analysis of the World Economic Forum.

⁵  TechNavio Global Mobile POS Systems Market 2015-2019 (2015).

34

PwC

117. China, the largest Asian market for EPOS devices, is the main driver of growth in the Asia-Pacific region. For example, 50.6% of all EPOS shipments in 2014 were performed in China. The increasing shift in consumer spending from basic necessities such as food and habitation to more freely available goods presents tremendous growth opportunities for retail. The number of installed EPOS devices is expected to rise to approximately 2.4 million units in 2020. This corresponds to an average annual growth rate of 9.7% in the period from 2014 to 2020.

118. In 2014, there was only a moderate increase of 1.4% discernible in the new installation of EPOS systems in the Middle East/Africa region. In this regard, the development varies widely within the region. For example, the market grew strongly in Israel (21.7%) and Morocco (16.7%), while, contrastingly, the development in Saudi Arabia declined by -15.2%. During the period under review, it is expected there will be strong growth in the region, with an average annual growth rate of 11.1% for shipments and 8.3% for installed units in the period from 2014 to 2020. It is expected that in 2020 there will be approximately 530 k installed units in the Middle East/Africa region.¹

119. In common with the Hardware market already analyzed in the banking segment, it is expected that the market for EPOS systems in retail will present scarcely any growth opportunities in the advanced economic regions. Over the long term, it is anticipated that the installed basis will rise only moderately in many regions, and that there will be a decline in shipments. This is connected to the maturity of the markets, as well as the increased use of mobile payment methods and mPOS systems. mPOS systems, on the other hand, also present tremendous growth opportunities, because they feature diverse functionality and assist retailers, from inventory management to processing payment transactions. Within growth markets, the retail sector mainly comprises small family enterprises and independent retail outlets. Large retail chains do not feature widely. Increasing population income in the region presents large growth to the retail industry, resulting in the efforts of larger numbers of western retail chains to become established there. This also entails sizeable growth opportunities for EPOS systems in these regions.

Retail – Software and Services

Global trends

120. In the fiercely contested market environment of customers and customer loyalty, retailers are increasingly investing in information technologies. In this respect, the market is increasingly switching from the pure sale of merchandise and the management of retail space to more innovative and technologically advanced sales channels. This results from factors such as the comfort of online shopping, greater product range selection and a large number of payment methods. The main drivers of growth here are the higher costs for the collection and analysis of customer data, market automation for optimal use of budgets, as well as the growing demand for mobile applications.²

121. There is therefore a greater focus on local customer demand, shop qualities and product preferences. As part of this development, increasingly greater importance is also attached to SMAC, the observation of social networking trends, mobile computing, analytics and cloud computing. It is expected that 2.6 billion people will be smartphone users by 2018. There is also an ever increasing number of smartphone users who make purchases using these devices. Whereas around 12% of users used their smartphones for such activities in 2014, this number had already risen to 20% in 2015.¹

¹  RBR: Global EPOS and Self-Checkout (2015).

²  Cf. TechNavio: Global Retail IT Spending Market (2016), p. 12 et seqq.

¹  PwC: Global Total Retail 2016 (2016), p. 7.

35

PwC

122. This has a significant influence on the change in IT expenditure in retail, as shown in the following market forecast.

Source: Global Retail IT Spending Market (TechNavio)

123. For the period from 2014 to 2020, it is anticipated that worldwide IT expenditure in retail will increase by around USD 19.1 billion to USD 111 billion (CAGR 15-20: 3.8%). The areas of Hardware (share in 2015: 31.9%), Software (30.6%) and Services (37.5%) could differ in this regard. With an average annual growth rate of 5.5% up to 2020, the highest growth potential is exhibited by Software. The amount of USD 36.8 billion is expected for 2020. This means that the expenditure for software in 2020 would exceed that for hardware (USD 32.9 billion). The average annual growth rate of Services is around 3.7% during the same period, while the comparable figure for Hardware is 2.3%.² This means that, in common with the banking sector, there is an evident shift in the IT budget towards software and service.

²  TechNavio: Global Retail IT Spending Market (2016). Hardware encompasses expenditure made in the retail sector on PCs, servers, storage and network technology. Software denotes application software and infrastructure software. Services covers support services, computer-aided design, system integration as well as testing services.

36

PwC

124. The development of IT expenditure in retail in the regions of Europe, Middle East and Africa, America and Asia-Pacific is described below.

Source: Global Retail IT Spending Market (TechNavio)

Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA)

125. With an average annual growth rate of 2.9% in the period from 2015 to 2020, the expected growth of IT expenditure in the retail sector in the EMEA economic region is falling below the global trend. It is anticipated that IT expenditure in retail within the EMEA will amount to USD 37.4 billion in 2020. High growth rates are apparent for e-commerce due to the growth of online sales in Germany, France, Sweden, the United Kingdom and the Netherlands. However, the concerns of many retailers about security when using cloud infrastructures are putting a brake on short-term growth. However, over the long term this economic region is expected to enjoy large growth potential due to the growing popularity of mobile commerce.¹

America

126. With an amount of USD 39.7 billion or a 43.2% market share, America is the largest market for IT expenditure. Investments in payment systems, data security and the penetration of mobile phones are particular main drivers of this strong growth. With growth of USD 5.5 billion to USD 39.7 billion in 2015, the economic region has recently grown more strongly than any other worldwide. Further average growth of 4.2% up to USD 48.8 billion is expected in the period from 2015 to 2020. This results both from the fact that many retailers are making investments in response to the new EMV standards, and also due to changes in the purchasing behavior of customers. For example, mobile purchase processes, social networks and increasing ways of making price comparisons are coming to the fore and influencing the investments of retailers.²

¹  TechNavio: Global Retail IT Spending Market (2016), p. 26.

²  TechNavio: Global Retail IT Spending Market (2016), p. 25.

37

PwC

Asia-Pacific (APAC)

127. The volume of IT expenditure in retail within the Asia-Pacific region was put at USD 19.9 billion in 2015, about 21.6% of the global market. Average growth of 4.6% is forecast up to 2020, making this the highest relative growth potential. The free disposability of a large part of income in many countries in this region, due to the increasing population income, is leading to additional expenditure in areas inter alia clothing, eating and drinking, durables, fast-food restaurants and special expenses. The subsequent growth of online retailers is leading to a high volume of investment in IT infrastructure and associated services.¹

128. The consumer behavior of the Chinese population is increasingly developing into an indicator of global trends.² The proportion of the total population who are smartphone users, and the use of smartphones to purchase items, was growing strongly in the near past. Whereas around 18% used their smartphone for such activities in 2014, this figure already stood at 43% in 2015. This is far ahead of the global trend of 12% in 2014 and 20% in 2015.³ The revenues in retail increased by approximately 10% from 2014 to 2015. The expenditure in IT in recent years also grew correspondingly to a large degree. IT expenditure in retail in China amounted to about USD 2.1 billion in 2014, an increase of 9.3% in comparison to the preceding fiscal year. It can be seen here that a much greater proportion (61.3%) of IT expenditure is for hardware, compared to the global trend (31.9%). The proportion directed towards software and services was correspondingly lower at 17.8% and 16.9% respectively.

129. However, the greatest potential for IT is presented by India. In 2014, revenues in the amount of USD 500 billion were achieved in retail. However, organized wholesale markets, supermarkets and retail chains contributed less than 10% of this. The rest of the market is unorganized, and consists of small family enterprises and independent retailers. Small and medium-sized enterprises therefore particularly present a large sales potential for software solutions to control merchandise management, business intelligence software and security solutions.⁴

¹  TechNavio: Global Retail IT Spending Market (2016), p. 27.

²  PwC: Global Total Retail 2016 (2016), p. 5.

³  PwC: Global Total Retail 2016 (2016), p. 7.

⁴  TechNavio: Global Retail IT Spending Market (2016), p. 29.

38

PwC

130. The following market forecast shows the IT expenditure broken down to the segments hardware, software and services.

Source: Global Retail IT Spending Market (TechNavio)

131. It is anticipated that the proportion of IT expenditure on hardware will fall from 31.9% in 2015 to 29.6% in 2020. The proportion of expenditure on software here is increasing by 2.6 percentage points to 33.2%. There is a growing focus, particularly on the collection and processing of (customer) data and the use of all existing sales channels (omni-channel). Particularly important in this respect is the development of mobile applications via which products are marketed and information on user behavior is collected.

c.) Competitive situation

132. The global market for the products and services of Wincor Nixdorf is highly competitive with regard to pricing, quality, development time and time-to-market, as well as the customer service. Many customers pursue a dual vendor strategy, seeking to avoid becoming dependent on any one vendor.

133. In principle, there is an observable connection between country of origin and market share. Whereas vendors such as NCR Corporation, Duluth, Georgia, USA („NCR“) and Diebold Inc. dominate the American retail banking market, Wincor Nixdorf is the market leader in Europe. A similar picture is apparent when looking at the commercial sector, in which Wincor Nixdorf again enjoys market leadership in Europe, while NCR and Toshiba, which took over the business of IBM, are deeply rooted in America.

39

PwC

134. In the retail banking sector, over 60% of the ATMs in the marketplace in 2014 originated from the three major vendors NCR, Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf.¹ In this context, Wincor Nixdorf services 21 out of 25 of the world’s leading banks.

Source: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (RBR 2015)

135. The market share of the other competitors, most of which are based in the Asian region, has increased in recent times. These do not concentrate exclusively on the markets within their immediate geographical surroundings, but are instead increasingly penetrating the home markets of the big three. The services portfolio extends from low-cost products to high-end cash recycling machines. This has led to increased pressure on prices, which is currently dominating the industry. Aside from the high level of competition among vendors, the pressure to consolidate on the customer side is rapidly influencing the market positions of the individual competitors.

Source: Global EPOS and Self-Checkout 2015 (RBR)

¹  RBR: Global ATM Market and Forecasts to 2020 (2015).

40

PwC

136. The retail sector is segmented to a higher degree. Based on the EPOS systems shipped in 2014, Wincor Nixdorf is the fourth largest vendor with around 8% of the global market share. Wincor Nixdorf is working here with 16 of the 25 strongest selling retailers.

137. In shipments of SCO systems, with 16% Wincor Nixdorf occupies second place behind NCR, which dominates this product segment with 64%, but which has recently had to cede market shares to Wincor Nixdorf. The business is likewise shaped by a high level of competition, not least because the large retailers with their large-scale orders have a certain degree of buying power at the expense of the manufacturers.

138. The goal pursued of Wincor Nixdorf having a large share of software also directly impacts the general competitive situation. In this connection are the degree of cross-channel functionality, the ability to develop innovative products, and the ability to fulfill customer requirements in the light of increasing levels of process digitization are the decisive competitive factors. In this field, Wincor Nixdorf is also confronted in part by new competitors which do not come from the hardware production area, and which therefore have a different focus and different core competencies. In comparison to the hardware segment where the market is concentrated on just a few, big players the segments software/services is segmented to a high degree, generating competitive pressure.

Source: Global Retail IT Spending Market (TechNavio 2015)

139. In the retail industry, HP with a market share of 8.5% before IBM (5.5%), Dell (4.7%) and Cisco (2.0%) the largest vendor. The remaining 79.3% are distributed among many small competitors, each with a market share of less than 2.0%. In the area of banking software, they tend more to be consulting firms, such as Capgemini and Accenture, as well as the producers of banking software, such as Diebold Inc. and KAL.

140. The new business with solutions for cashless payment is to be observed in isolation, including with a view to the competitive situation. Because the market segment is still relatively new, and due to the potential that other companies have also identified in this area, the competitive landscape – and consequently its situation – will likely still change significantly, and this has been difficult to assess to date.

41

PwC

3. Key success factors for the business model

141. Strengths

• Wincor Nixdorf has a high market share of the German and European home market.

• The Wincor Nixdorf brand is associated with high-grade hardware, software and services.

• The company possesses a broad customer base, and has established a high level of customer loyalty because of its extensive expertise and long-term relationships.

• Wincor Nixdorf has a high innovativeness, e.g. visible in business units such as AEVI

• There is only weakly pronounced dependence on large customers and the diverse customer groups in the Retail and banking segments make it possible to reduce the volatility of the total sales.

• The existing know-how and much experience with regards to the needs prevalent in the branches of retailers and retail banks enables a distinction to be made in the software segment in relation to more general IT vendors.

• The Company acts as one of the few globally operating services providers.

• Wincor Nixdorf possesses profound process know-how in front office.

142. Weaknesses

• The Company has a high proportion of sales in Europe.

• There is a dependency on the development of the two customer segments of retail banks and retailers.

• The cost base in the hardware segment is higher in comparison to the Asian competition.

• There is currently a high level of dependency on hardware sales, which have a relatively low margin.

• The market presence in the USA is relatively weak. The service network located there was transferred to a partner network.

143. Opportunities

• Successful development in the cashless payment (AEVI) area supports the growth strategies of marketing high-grade products in innovative business fields. The carve out of AEVI out of the corporate structure gives AEVI flexibility and facilitates further growth.

• The long-term partnership with customers in the hardware business means there is optimum access to additional innovative services taken from the software/services area.

• The increasing digitization in the branches presents attractive market growth potential, in which Wincor Nixdorf can establish itself as a specialist for suppling software and services to branches.

42

PwC

• Increasing the proportion of software and high-quality services in the total net sales may positively influence the margin.

• Wincor Nixdorf markets well-engineered software solutions, which can be readily adapted to the customer requirements.

• Successfully implementing the restructuring program Delta increases sustainably profitability and flexibility.

• The past has seen more and more developments undertaken with the customer; increasing the number of these projects reduces the costs for research and development, and can strengthen customer loyalty over the long term.

144. Risks

• It is not yet possible to determine any negative effects of the United Kingdom’s exit from the EU.

• The current challenging situation with a cautious economic outlook in the BRIC countries is lowering the prospects of growth there.

• There is a high level of regulatory uncertainty in some parts; in order to continue doing business in China, in response to regulatory rules Wincor Nixdorf decided to sell the majority of its Chinese business operation.

• A fraught situation specific to the sector means that customers in the retail banking segment are being more restrictive about their budget allocations for hardware and software/services for companies.

• The increasing presence of FinTech firms and their impact on traditional retail banks is not clear at this point in time.

• The growth planned by Wincor Nixdorf is not to come from organic means exclusively; suitable target companies are currently difficult to identify and valued very highly.

• The adjustments to customer demands for functionality and quality requires the improvement of existing products as well as the development of new innovative products.

• There are currency risks that cannot be fully hedged.

• Persistent high pressure on prices, exerted by the Asian competitors in particular, influences the margin and cost-effectiveness in the hardware segment.

• Reduced quantities of units in the hardware area have a negative impact on economies of scale. The current vertical reduction in hardware manufacturing capacity increases the risk with regard to the use of the components in production and the scheduled supply of components.

43

PwC

4. Net assets, financial position and results of operations

a) Group net assets and financial position

145. We have analyzed the net assets and financial position of the Wincor Nixdorf Group on the basis of the audited and certified consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years 2012/2013 through 2014/2015. The structure follows the consolidated financial statement of Wincor Nixdorf. Basis for the preparation of the financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf are the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Group balance sheet

[in mEUR]	30-Sep-13 Actual			30-Sep-14 Actual			30-Sep-15 Actual
Intangible assets		347			352			354
Property, plant and equipment		129			125			121
Investments accounted for using the equity method		6			4			2
Investments		1			1			1
Reworkable service parts		27			27			29
Trade receivables		6			6			16
Other assets		4			4			4
Deferred tax assets		31			41			48
Non-current assets		553			560			576
Inventories		317			343			327
Trade receivables		434			520			485
Receivables from related companies		1			3			7
Current income tax assets		10			8			11
Other assets		48			62			64
Investments		0			0			0
Cash and cash equivalents		43			44			38
Current assets		853			980			932
Total assets		1,406			1,540			1,507
Subscribed capital of Wincor Nixdorf AG		33			33			33
Retained earnings		488			529			477
Treasury shares		(176	)		(174	)		(174	)
Other components of equity		34			34			51
Non–controlling interests		4			4			4
Equity attributable to equity holders of Wincor Nixdorf AG		383			427			391
Accruals for pensions and similar commitments		66			78			83
Other accruals		27			27			18
Financial liabilities		91			86			66
Trade payables		0			0			—
Other liabilities		6			8			7
Deferred tax liabilities		28			28			23
Non–current liabilities		218			226			197
Other accruals		144			142			171
Financial liabilities		76			83			112
Advances received		25			25			21
Trade payables		299			344			338
Liabilities to related companies		2			3			2
Current income tax liabilities		44			48			40
Other liabilities		214			242			235
Current liabilities		805			887			919
Total equity and liabilities		1,406			1,540			1,507

Source: Consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

44

PwC

146. During the period under review, the total assets of the Group rose by about EUR 101m between 30 September 2013 and 30 September 2015. The asset-side increase is mainly attributable to a rise in trade receivables, in deferred tax assets as well as in other assets.

147. There was only a slight increase in the book value of intangible assets. Additions mainly related to the acquisition of property rights and licenses. In addition, internally generated intangible assets related to a multi-functional payment terminal for the AEVI business unit were capitalized.

148. The book value of property, plant and equipment declined during both periods. Additions to property, plant and equipment were lower than disposals/depreciation. In addition, a real property was sold in fiscal year 2013/2014. The additions were primarily attributable to investments in IT equipment and specialist tools.

149. Trade receivables comprise receivables from finance leases in the amount of EUR 22m. The leasing contracts were initially concluded for a term of up to ten years.

150. During the period under review, deferred tax assets rose by EUR 17m. Of the deferred tax assets of EUR 48m as at 30 September 2015, EUR 7m resulted from the probable future use of tax loss carryforwards.

151. Inventories mainly comprise finished goods and merchandise, which accounted about two thirds of the EUR 327m as at 30 September 2015. Inventories also include raw materials and supplies, unfinished goods and advances made. Inventories rose as at 30 September 2014 as a result of large order backlog at the end of the fiscal year, prompting an increase in finished goods and merchandise. As at 30 September 2015, inventories fell again and were on a slightly higher level compared with 30 September 2013.

152. Other assets mainly comprise sales tax receivables as well as prepaid expenses and deferred charges.

153. During the period under review, the equity of the Group rose by about EUR 8m between 30 September 2013 and 30 September 2015. The fiscal year 2013/2014 profit for the period exceeded the distribution for the preceding fiscal years and in the main caused equity as at 30 September 2014 to increase by EUR 34m to EUR 427m. In principle, in the past Wincor Nixdorf pursued a dividend policy under which 50% of the profit generated for a given period is distributed in the form of a dividend. As a result, fiscal year 2014/2015 saw about EUR 52m distributed to shareholders for the preceding fiscal year. The significant decline in the profit for the period of the order of some EUR 8m caused equity as at 30 September 2015 to fall to EUR 391m.

154. The rise in pension obligations of EUR 66m as at 30 September 2013 to EUR 83m as at 30 September 2015 was largely attributable to the use of a lower assumed interest rate in measuring provisions in fiscal year 2013-2014 when compared with the preceding fiscal year. Thus, pension obligations as at 30 September 2014 increased by EUR 12m to EUR 78m (2012/2013: EUR 66m). Essentially, this entails the reporting of net obligations after taking into account sums recorded as assets.

155. The non-current other accruals declined from EUR 27m as at 30 September 2013 to EUR 18m as at 30 September 2015. At the same time, current other accruals rose by EUR 27m as at 30 September 2015. Thus, the change is substantially due to the maturity of provisions. This mostly affected accruals for personnel obligations.

45

PwC

156. The decrease in non-current financial liabilities of EUR 25m to EUR 66m as at 30 September 2015 is mainly due to the decrease in the residual terms of liabilities in the amount of EUR 20m and the resulting reclassification as current financial liabilities in fiscal year 2014/2015.

157. The rise in current other accruals of EUR 27m to EUR 171m as at 30 September 2015 (2012/2013: EUR 144m) is largely attributable to liabilities for personnel expenses linked to the HR downsizing measures initiated as part of the restructuring program.

158. Fiscal year 2014/2015 (EUR 112m) saw current financial liabilities rise by some EUR 36m compared with fiscal year 2012/2013 (EUR 76m). This increase was due to the aforementioned reclassification of some of the financial liabilities due in fiscal year 2015/2016 as current financial liabilities as well as the greater utilization of short-term credit lines.

159. The increase in trade payables of EUR 45m to EUR 344m in total as at 30 September 2014 (2012/2013: EUR 299m) was attributable to the rise in year-end business in fiscal year 2013/2014.

160. The development of the structure of the Group balance sheet over time can be presented in condensed form as follows:

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Composition of balance sheet

[in mEUR]	30-Sep-13 Actual			30-Sep-14 Actual			30-Sep-15 Actual
Total assets
Non-current assets		39.3	%		36.4	%		38.2	%
Current assets		60.7	%		63.6	%		61.8	%
Total equity and liabilities
Equity attributable to equity holders of Wincor Nixdorf AG		27.2	%		27.7	%		26.0	%
Non–current liabilities		15.5	%		14.7	%		13.1	%
Current liabilities		57.3	%		57.6	%		61.0	%

Source: Consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

161. The ratio of non-current assets to current assets remains more or less constant with the exception of the variation observed as at 30 September 2014 due to an increase in current trade receivables.

162. In the period under observation, the equity ratio is upward of 25% but fell last year as a result of the unfavorable trend in earnings.

163. In addition, a slight shift from non-current to current liabilities can be observed. This is primarily due to the proportion of current financial liabilities, trade payables as well as current accruals.

46

PwC

b) Group results of operations

164. We have conducted an analysis of the Group results of operations on the basis of the consolidated income statements for fiscal years 2012/2013 through 2014/2015. The results of operations are as follows:

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Group results of operations before adjustments

[in mEUR]	FY 2012/2013 Actual			FY 2013/2014 Actual			FY 2014/2015 Actual
Net sales		2,465			2,469			2,427
Cost of sales		(1,922	)		(1,926	)		(1,993	)
Gross profit		543			544			434
Research & development expenses		(99	)		(98	)		(90	)
Selling, general and administration expenses		(312	)		(290	)		(322	)
EBITA		132			155			22
Amortization/depreciation of intangible and tangible assets and write-down of reworkable service parts		60			61			54
EBITDA		192			216			76
Financial result		(7	)		(9	)		(7	)
Amortization/depreciation of intangible and tangible assets and write-down of reworkable service parts		(60	)		(61	)		(54	)
EBT		124			146			15
Income tax		(36	)		(42	)		(7	)
Profit for the period		88			104			8
Profit attributable to non-controlling interests		(1	)		(3	)		(1	)
Profit attributable to equity holders of Wincor Nixdorf AG		87			101			6
Net sales growth					0.2	%		-1.7	%
Gross profit as % of net sales		22.0	%		22.0	%		17.9	%
R&D as % of net sales		4.0	%		4.0	%		3.7	%
SG&A as % of net sales		12.7	%		11.8	%		13.3	%
EBITA as % of net sales		5.3	%		6.3	%		0.9	%
EBITDA as % of net sales		7.8	%		8.7	%		3.1	%

Source: Consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

165. Net sales for fiscal year 2013/2014 were on about the same level as in the preceding fiscal year and then declined by about EUR 42m or 1.7% for fiscal year 2014/2015. It was possible to increase EBITA (“Earnings before interest, taxes, and amortization”), which is used for internal control purposes, by EUR 132m to EUR 155m in fiscal year 2013/2014. Fiscal year 2014/2015 saw EBITA fall markedly to EUR 22m. A significant proportion of the decline was attributable to expenses incurred in connection with the restructuring program “Delta” initiated by Wincor Nixdorf in response to market conditions.

166. The recent downward trend in net sales is largely due to a series of facts: Conditions on the important future markets for Wincor Nixdorf of Brazil, Russia and China deteriorated unexpectedly so that, instead of posting the growth that was forecast, business declined, in part substantially. In addition, retail banks and the retail industry in important industrialized countries displayed an unexpected reluctance to invest. These two effects, with which the competition was also confronted, primarily led to a significant decrease in the hardware business, which is struggling continuously with a drop in prices. Growth in the software/services business also failed to make up for the decrease. In addition to the aforementioned market conditions, there were also delays in acquisition projects that were intended to lend support to the growth strategy and therefore could not serve as a growth driver so far.

167. From a regional perspective, Germany was able to grow from EUR 567m in 2012/2013 to EUR 588m in 2013/2014 thanks to the several large-scale projects in the Retail business. However, fiscal year 2014/2015 saw net sales drop below the level for 2012/2013 to EUR 555m, which corresponds to 23%. Business in Europe (without Germany) contracted over both periods subject to review by 6.1% in 2013/2014 and by 3.9% in 2014/2015 to EUR 1.097m. Business trends in Eastern Europe above all were

47

PwC

negative, with Russia particularly noteworthy in this regard. Thus, the share of Group net sales accounted for by the European business (excluding Germany) has fallen from 49% to 45% at present. The Asia/Pacific/Africa region, however, grew by 6.5% and 7.9% during the period under review while accounting for EUR 480m in volume terms at the end of the period under observation. This was achieved despite a decrease in the Chinese business. The corresponding share of Group net sales rose by 20%. In 2013/2014, business in America grew by 11.4% to EUR 294m. Wincor Nixdorf was thus able to profit from the expansion of European retailers into the United States. In fiscal year 2014/2015, net sales remained on about the same level as in the preceding fiscal year, increasing by just EUR 1m. In fiscal year 2014/2015 the net sales in the remained on prior-year level and contributed 12% to total net sales for the Group.

Source: Consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

168. Banking segment net sales contracted in 2013/2014 from EUR 1,614m to EUR 1,566m, before recovering in the following fiscal year to reach EUR 1,582m. The weak phase in 2013/2014 was due in particular to the geopolitical conflict between Ukraine and Russia. The crisis resulted in the massive devaluation of the Russian ruble, triggering a substantial reduction in volumes for orders and for net sales. The hardware business and the business with product-related services in particular were behind the slump in net sales. Business in Turkey was also adversely affected. As Europe (without Germany) is the most important individual region, the decline in net sales could not be offset by growth in other regions. In fiscal year 2014/2015, the hardware business in Russia and in China particularly suffered but was overcompensated by the positive trend in other business streams. The Banking segment currently contributes 65% to total net sales.

48

PwC

Source: Consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

169. In 2013/2014, Retail segment net sales grew by 6.1% to EUR 903m. In this regard, Wincor Nixdorf profited in particular from the efforts of large-scale global enterprises to standardize their IT infrastructures. Large orders from service station operators and POS terminal software were particularly responsible for the growth posted by the segment. No large orders of a similar kind were noted in fiscal year 2014/2015. As a result of this and a general reluctance to invest on the part of major retailers, especially in Europe, that only began to dissipate toward the end of calendar year 2015, segment net sales for 2014/2015 contracted to just EUR 845m (-6.4%). It therefore – as at the start of the historical period under observation – contributes 35% to total net sales.

170. In the case of net sales by business stream, hardware sales declined by 4.9% during the period under review in fiscal year 2013/2014 and by 9.9% in fiscal year 2014/2015. In fiscal year 2013/2014, the decrease could be overcompensated by the growth in the software/services business of 4.8%. In the last fiscal year, however, the growth of 5.2% was insufficient to make up for the significantly decreasing hardware business. Consequently, the share of total net sales accounting for hardware declined from 48% in 2012/13 to just 42% in 2014/15. There was a proportionate increase in the share accounted for by software/service.

49

PwC

Source: Consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

171. In fiscal years 2012/2013 and 2013/2014, the ratio of cost of sales to net sales remained constant (gross margin: 22.0%). In fiscal year 2014/2015, however, the gross margin fell to 17.9%. This decrease is largely due to economics of scale. In addition, foreign currency gains and losses disclosed in the consolidated income statement were essentially disclosed under cost of sales. They amounted to EUR -36m in 2014/2015 (EUR -8m in 2013/2014 and EUR -10m in 2012/2013). Further, the cost of sales also includes restructuring expenses that adversely affected the margin as extraordinary expenses.

172. Research and development costs remained at a high, constant level. They only fell in fiscal year 2014/2015 by EUR 8m. This was in part attributable to the capitalization of development costs for intangible assets in the amount of EUR 4m. A further cause was the reduction in the number of persons employed in this area from 750 in 2013/2014 to 720 in 2014/2015. Capacity in the hardware development area was scaled back above all to direct the future objective towards software/service.

173. Selling, general, and administration expenses mainly comprise personnel expenses and general costs in selling and administrative departments as well as miscellaneous taxes. In addition, the results for other operating income as well as for investments accounted for using the equity method are also presented. The item was lower in fiscal year 2013/2014 as a result of other operating income deriving from the sale of a real property. In fiscal year 2014/2015, selling and administration costs, like cost of sales, were negatively impacted by one-time effects connected with the ongoing restructuring program.

174. EBITA could be primarily increased as a result of one-time effects in fiscal year 2013/2014 to EUR 155m, which corresponds to a EBITA margin of 6.3%. In 2014/2015, the aforementioned unfavorable economic factors as well as the costs of the restructuring program “Delta” resulted in a significant decline. Consequently, EBITA only amounted to EUR 22m, which corresponds to a margin of 0.9%.

175. The amortization/depreciation of property, plant and equipment and licenses in fiscal years 2012/2013 and 2013/2014 was on about the same level and amounted to EUR 61m in 2013/2014. In fiscal year 2014/2015, such charges declined by EUR 7m. This was primarily due to capitalized specialist tools being fully depreciated. They were capitalized in connection with the development of the new banking product line “CINEO” in previous years and which was depreciated over a useful life that ended at the end of fiscal year 2013/2014. In addition, a decrease was also recorded in the depreciation of reworkable service parts.

50

PwC

176. The financial result initially rose slightly in 2013/2014 to EUR 9m. In 2014/2015, the figure declined to the original level of EUR 7m for fiscal year 2012/2013. Alongside income from securities, interest and other income, the item primarily includes interest and similar expenses as well as expenses related to the interest element within additions to long-term accruals and other finance costs.

177. Income taxes comprises taxes on current income and profit as well as from deferred tax income and expenses. At EUR -26m in fiscal year 2014/2015, current taxes were significantly lower than in previous fiscal years (EUR -40m in 2013/2014). In addition, deferred tax income of EUR 19m was generated in 2014/2015 whereas previous years saw deferred tax expenses incurred of EUR -3m (2013/2014) and EUR -7m (2012/2013).

178. Profit for the period initially developed positively to EUR 104m in 2013/2014 as a result of the aforementioned effects. In the following year – affected by the economic environment and the abovementioned one-time effects – it amounted to EUR 8m.

c) Adjustment to results of operations

179. On the basis of auditor’s reports and annual reports as well as talks with the Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf and persons named by them, we have analyzed the results of operations so as to identify income and expenses that are extraordinary, unrelated to the period or unrelated to regular operations. In doing so, we have restricted ourselves to income and expenses that impact earnings to derive a meaningful EBITA margin for the past. However, the adjustment will not affect the determination of business value as the valuation is based on the results for future fiscal years, which means that the adjusted earnings for the past only serve plausibility verification purposes.

180. The period under review is only affected by a small number of factors requiring adjustment.

181. The results of operations for Wincor Nixdorf in fiscal year 2012/2013 were still affected by restructuring expenses from an earlier fiscal year (“One-Wincor” program). They amounted to EUR 20m in total.

182. The results of operations for fiscal year 2013/2014 were positively impacted by the sale of a real property in Singapore. The sale generated proceeds of EUR 26m compared with associated expenses of EUR 6m. The net effect of EUR 20m was disclosed predominantly under selling and administration expenses.

183. In fiscal year 2014/2015, Wincor Nixdorf launched a new restructuring program called “Delta”. We have eliminated the expenses associated with the program below. The expenses associated with the program increased cost of sales by EUR 55m, R&D costs by an additional EUR 4m and selling and administration expenses by an additional EUR 21m. Thus, the total costs of the program amounted to EUR 80m in fiscal year 2014/2015.

51

PwC

184. The following table summarizes the adjustments that were made:

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Adjustments

[in mEUR]	FY 2012/2013 Actual		FY 2013/2014 Actual			FY 2014/2015 Actual
Cost of sales		—		—			55
Research and development expenses		—		—			4
Selling, general and administration expenses		—		—			21
Restructuring program Delta in 2014/2015		—		—			80
		—		—			—
Selling, general and administration expenses		—		(26	)		—
Selling, general and administration expenses		—		6			—
Sale of a property		—		(20	)		—
Cost of sales		12		—			—
Research and development expenses		3		—			—
Selling, general and administration expenses		5		—			—
Restructuring program One Wincor in 2011/2012		20		—			—

Source: Company data, PwC analysis

185. The following table shows the adjusted earnings items through to EBITA:

Wincor Nixdorf AG - adjusted Group-EBITA

[in mEUR]	FY 2012/2013 Actual			FY 2013/2014 Actual			FY 2014/2015 Actual
Net sales		2,465			2,469			2,427
Cost of sales (adjusted)		(1,910	)		(1,926	)		(1,938	)
Gross profit(adjusted)		555			544			489
Research and development expenses (adjusted)		(96	)		(98	)		(86	)
Selling, general and administration expenses (adjusted)		(307	)		(310	)		(301	)
EBITA (adjusted)		152			135			102
Net sales growth		—			0.2	%		-1.7	%
Gross profit (adjusted) as % of net sales		22.5	%		22.0	%		20.1	%
R&D (adjusted) as % of net sales		3.9	%		4.0	%		3.5	%
SG&A (adjusted) as % of net sales		12.5	%		12.6	%		12.4	%
EBITA (adjusted) as % of net sales		6.1	%		5.5	%		4.2	%

Source: Company data, consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

186. Although not shown here, net sales growth was also affected by the project “Delta”. The effect, however, is difficult to quantify because in parts the effect is based on the resolution of unfavorable contracts (negative margin).

187. The gross margin shown for the adjusted figures only amounted to 1.9 percentage points in fiscal year 2014/2015, a decrease that is largely due to foreign currency losses. The course of business over the three fiscal years is roughly at the same level.

188. The adjusted EBITA margin, in contrast to the margin reported, declined from 6.1% in 2012/2013 to 4.2% in 2014/2015.

52

PwC

04 Determination of business value of Wincor Nixdorf AG

I. Valuation basis

1. Procedure and fundamental premises

189. In the following, we present an overview of the methodology and procedures employed to derive the business value of Wincor Nixdorf.

190. Businesses often also hold non-operating assets in addition to operating assets. In principle, the business value comprises the earnings value of operating assets and/or its operating business, as well as the value of non-operating assets. Non-operating assets can be freely disposed of without affecting the actual purpose of the company. They must be valued separately as part of the valuation of the enterprise. Wincor Nixdorf, as according to information provided, does not hold any noteworthy non-operating assets.

191. Income deriving from Wincor Nixdorf investments that are not fully consolidated are included in forecast calculations on a proportionate basis and are therefore taken into account directly in the determination of business value.

192. A projection needs to be made in order to determine the capitalized earnings value from the operating business which covers a detailed planning period (Phase I) and the period thereafter (Phase II; perpetual annuity). For Phase I, we had in our possession the forecast calculations for fiscal years 2015/2016 to 2017/2018, which the Supervisory Board of Wincor Nixdorf adopted for 2015/2016 and acknowledged for 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 on 23 September 2015. The forecast as of July 2016 superseded the first year of the budget forecast for 2015/2016 in the course of our valuation. Further new findings, which only became apparent in the course of the fiscal year, were factored into the forecast for 2015/2016. This particularly applies to the partially sale of the Chinese business activities to the strategic partner Aisino Corporation, a decision made due to Chinese state bodies. Wincor Nixdorf is to become a minority shareholder in the Chinese company with a 43.6% stake. The economic impact of this latest development was already reflected in Wincor Nixdorf’s forecast for 2015/2016 which we used, even though the legal transfer of the company had yet to be consummated at that time because it is subject to approval by state bodies. In addition, the forecast includes a better sales development and lower restructuring expenses from program Delta. Moreover, the mid-term plan for the years 2016/17 and 2017/18 was adjusted. The adjustment considers revenue and EBITA effects from the partial sale of the Chinese business operations as well as a slightly improved development regarding the hardware and service operations, which compensates a moderate development in software operations – also due to the not achieved acquisition targets in 2015/16 – and the decreased profit due to the partial sale of the Chinese operations. Therefore, operating profits (EBITA) for the year 2016/17 and 2017/18 remain unchanged compared to business plan as of September 2015. The Supervisory Board acknowledged the 2015/2016 forecast as well as the adjustments to the operational plan for the following years resulting from the sale of a stake of its business in China and the slight shift between hardware, software and services business on 27 July 2016.

53

PwC

193. The forecast calculations were tested for plausibility on the basis of historical earnings for the financial years 2012/2013 to 2014/2015. To this end, past earnings components that were extraordinary in character were identified and an adjusted income statement was calculated. A further plausibility check of the underlying assumptions was made on the basis of the planning documents made available by the company, the forecast for 2015/2016 from July 2016 acknowledged by the supervisory board, the information provided, and external sector and market data. Synergy potential identified by the contracting parties (pseudo synergies), which were not reflected in Wincor Nixdorf’s forecast, were, where necessary, also taken into account to calculate the business value. The pseudo synergies will be fully realized in 2018/2019, i.e. after the completion of our detailed planning period. In order to properly reflect pseudo synergies and realization costs in our valuation, we have extended the detailed planning period technical by one year.

194. A capitalized earnings valuation was performed by first calculating projected future earnings before interest and taxes (EBITA). Following the extension of the planning period by 2018/2019 due to technical reasons (synergies; cf. Chapter 4.II.2), the valuations of the last detailed planning year were basis for the sustainable EBITA as of 2019/2020 (Phase II) maintaining a sustainable growth rate. Moreover, reinvestment ratios, rather than depreciation and amortization, were applied in Phase II. Supplementary considerations were employed in this regard.

195. The projected results before income tax are less any corporate taxes and personal income taxes of shareholders. Trade tax, corporation tax, the solidarity surcharge and foreign taxes were taken into account for corporate tax purposes.

196. In accordance with the recommendations of the Institute of Public Auditors in Germany, Incorporated Association (Institut der Wirtschaftsprüfer in Deutschland e.V., IDW), in assessing the amount of personal income tax, we proceeded on the basis that the shareholder is a domestic-based natural person with unlimited tax liability. It was also presumed that the shares are held as private assets and that such shareholding does not fulfill the conditions contained in § 17(1) sentence 1 of the German Income Tax Act (Einkommensteuergesetz, EStG). The withholding tax system in force since 2009 applies a 25.0% rate of personal tax on distributions along with the solidarity surcharge levied thereon. In determining the net distributions, we have taken into account the tax benefits derived at the shareholder level. We have taken into account the taxation of capital gains accrued over the period by applying an annual effective rate of 12.5% plus the solidarity surcharge levied thereon.

197. We have presented our basic considerations and methods for deriving the discount rate in detail in Section 4.III.

198. We calculated the business value of Wincor Nixdorf as at the valuation date of 26 September 2016 on a going concern basis under the assumption that the company will continue to operate in the foreseeable future. The business value was calculated using the following valuation methods:

• The forecast calculations for the income statement and the balance sheet were made available to us by Wincor Nixdorf.

• In addition we have – based on management information – taken the following issues into account in our valuation: the recording of the stock option scheme on the liabilities side of the balance sheet, the inclusion of pseudo synergies and the adjustment of those balance sheet items in line with the findings of the latest forecast for 2015/2016, as well as the effects of the partially sale of the Chinese activities for 2016/2017 and 2017/2018, which are relevant for the valuation.

54

PwC

• We calculated the anticipated financial result and the corporate taxes separately using our own valuation model following the company operational plan and the expected changes in the balance sheet.

• In connection with the sale of minority stakes of AEVI in May 2016 (and planned in August 2016), the proportion of total earnings of AEVI attributable to minority stockholders’ interests has to be taken into account in group-level calculation of total earnings of attributable to minority stockholders’ and those attributable to shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf.

2. Planning process and planning accuracy

199. The operative planning process of the company is carried out over a 3-year detailed planning period commencing in April and running to the end of each fiscal year. While the main focus of the business plan is on the first planning year, which entails detailed planning being undertaken, the business planning for the two subsequent planning years is performed periodically simplified forward projection of the key financial indicators. A monthly “rolling forecast” is simultaneously used for the current fiscal year to enable deviations from the budget to be detected in a timely manner. The focus here is on the key control variables at the net sales and EBITA level. The forecast calculations for Wincor Nixdorf are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS).

200. Wincor Nixdorf group operational plan is based on the forecast calculations for its individual subsidiaries. Alongside the fully consolidated companies, they also include anticipated income from non-consolidated investments. The company also prepares a tax and net interest income/loss forecast for the entire planning period. Furthermore, the company prepares a detailed balance sheet forecast for the budget year and updates it for the second and third planning year on the basis of simplified assumptions.

201. The beginning of the planning process entails a top-down “hurdle process” in which target values are devised for the Group, segments and business units. These target values are then subsequently broken down as hurdles by the segments and the business units for the planning units in the planning system (legal entities, regions etc.). Binding target values are the result of this planning stage and are recorded in the planning system (Artis). The hurdles are communicated and published Group-wide by the planning letter being sent to the planning units. A communication phase subsequently ensues between the planning units and the segments and business units. The planning units record the detailed plans and forecasts in the planning system (bottom-up) until mid-July. This data is reviewed by the segments and business units and reconciled with the overall objectives for these organizational entities. Approval of the budget of the first planning year is obtained by the Supervisory Board. The plan for the subsequent year is brought to the Supervisory Board’s attention. Once the Supervisory Board and management have approved the Group plan, management at the group, segment, and business unit level and management of the planning units “signing the budget”. This agreement also forms the basis for the variable income of the management of the organizational unit.

55

PwC

202. The budget plans for 2012/2013, 2013/2014 and 2014/2015 were made available to us for the purpose of analyzing the accuracy of previous forecasts. At the beginning of July, we were also provided with the forecast for 2015/2016 based on the provisional actual figures for the first nine months of the 2015/2016 fiscal year. We made reference to the previous forecast which served to indicate budgetary compliance in the current fiscal year. We conducted our analysis of the planning accuracy of the key control variables (net sales and EBITA) level and also as regards standard costs items using the cost of sales method which thereby enabled us to identify the key deviations. The target/actual analysis is shown in the table below:

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Plan/Actual analysis 2012/2013 - 2014/2015

	FY 2012/2013						Deviation						FY 2013/2014						Deviation						FY 2014/2015						Deviation
[in mEUR]	Budget			Actual			Absolute			Relative			Budget			Actual			Absolute			Relative			Budget			Actual			Absolute			Relative
Net sales Banking		1,525			1,614			89			5.8	%		1,675			1,567			(109	)		-6.5	%		1,570			1,582			12			0.7	%
Net sales Retail		850			851			1			0.2	%		885			903			18			2.0	%		895			845			(50	)		-5.5	%
Total net sales		2,375			2,465			90			3.8	%		2,560			2,469			(91	)		-3.5	%		2,465			2,427			(38	)		-1.5	%
Cost of sales		(1,854	)		(1,922	)		(69	)		3.7	%		(1,994	)		(1,926	)		68			-3.4	%		(1,911	)		(1,993	)		(82	)		4.3	%
Gross profit		522			543			21			4.1	%		566			544			(22	)		-3.9	%		554			434			(120	)		-21.7	%
Research & development expenses		(95	)		(99	)		(4	)		3.9	%		(95	)		(98	)		(3	)		3.5	%		(99	)		(90	)		9			-9.5	%
Selling, general and administration expenses		(307	)		(312	)		(6	)		1.9	%		(316	)		(290	)		26			-8.1	%		(320	)		(322	)		(2	)		0.7	%
EBITA Banking		82			103			21			25.8	%		117			105			(13	)		-10.6	%		95			3			(92	)		-96.7	%
EBITA Retail		39			29			(10	)		-24.7	%		38			50			12			33.0	%		40			19			(21	)		-52.9	%
Total EBITA		120			132			12			9.7	%		155			155			—			0.0	%		135			22			(113	)		-83.8	%
Gross profit as % of net sales		22.0	%		22.0	%								22.1	%		22.0	%								22.5	%		17.9	%
R&D as % of net sales		4.0	%		4.0	%								3.7	%		4.0	%								4.0	%		3.7	%
SG&A as % of net sales		12.9	%		12.7	%								12.3	%		11.8	%								13.0	%		13.3	%
EBITA in % of net sales		5.1	%		5.3	%								6.1	%		6.3	%								5.5	%		0.9	%
EBITA Banking in % of net sales		5.3	%		6.4	%								7.0	%		6.7	%								6.1	%		0.2	%
EBITA Retail in % of net sales		4.5	%		3.4	%								4.2	%		5.5	%								4.5	%		2.2	%

Source: Company data, consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

203. The business plan for Wincor Nixdorf was prepared at the beginning of the 2012/2013 fiscal year at a time of growing uncertainty: In particular, given that it was still not possible to gauge the economic repercussions of the ongoing financial and debt crisis and the unresolved budget impasse in the United States, this necessitated somewhat conservative planning. The original net sales forecast was exceeded by 3.8% particularly due to this reason.

204. The positive deviation was chiefly attributable to the Banking segment and is especially due to positive growth fueled by emerging market countries, particularly Turkey and Russia. In addition, the hardware business grew, primarily due to its good cash system sales figures, with significant growth reported in emerging market countries in Asia, the Pacific, Africa and in Latin America.

205. R&D expenses have exceeded the budgeted amounts by 3.9% for the 2012/2013 fiscal year and have varied markedly across the segments. While the R&D budget for the Retail division remained 20.4% below budget, the budget limit for the Banking segment was exceeded by 16.7%. This change is chiefly attributable to the R&D spending for two product lines in the Retail segment being below budget. By contrast, spending for the CINEO product line (Banking), was forced to go well over budget as a result of shifting priorities. Additional expenses were also incurred for the Pro Cash (Banking) product line.

206. The selling and administration expenses merely deviate by 2% Group-wide from the projected figures, but this is attributable to the mixed impact from Retail and banking. The Retail segment exceeds the budget for selling and administration expenses by 5.3%, whereas the Banking segment was almost exactly within budget. The budget deviation was especially attributable to the increased distribution costs, which arose in the course of the product supply process. At the same time, the selling and administration expenses in the sales units were generally slightly over budget. Further budget overruns also ensued from the allocation of Group functions and the Retail HQ functions.

56

PwC

207. The forecast prepared at the beginning of the 2012/2013 fiscal year indicated that EBITA amounted to EUR 120m, and projected the same amount of EBITA as in the preceding fiscal year. In fact, EBITA was recorded at EUR 132m (+9.7%). In light of the foregoing, spending in the Retail segment was, however, well below budget (selling and administration expenses, see above), whereas the good results posted in the Banking segment overcompensated for the failure to meet planned targets in the Retail segment.

208. A year-on-year 3.8% increase in sales revenue was forecast for 2013/2014, but failed to materialize. Instead, turnover was the same as that for the preceding fiscal year.

209. Stagnant growth in the 2013/14 planning year was due to the mixed impact regionally: A solid business performance at the previous fiscal year’s level in the established industrialized countries in Europe and vastly improved year-on-year sales recorded in North America had an especially positive impact. Wincor Nixdorf also managed to expand its business into emerging market countries throughout Asia, the Pacific and Latin America. The emerging market countries in Europe are, however, performing well below expectations, a situation compounded by geopolitical tensions between Ukraine and Russia. The crisis resulted in the massive devaluation of the Russian ruble, triggering a substantial reduction in volumes for orders and for net sales. Business in Turkey was also adversely affected. As Europe (without Germany) is the most important individual region, the decline in net sales could not be offset and compensated by growth in other regions. Actual sales in Europe (without Germany) ran at 6.4% behind projected figures.

210. The fact that emerging market countries are beset by regional weaknesses is also another key reason why the net sales forecast in the Banking segment failed to materialize. Net sales in the emerging market countries in Europe fell short of the business plan targets by 14.1%. This was mainly due to the unexpected downturn in the hardware business (-13.7% across all regions). Net sales in the Banking segment as a whole deviated from budgeted targets by 6.5%. Negative deviations from the budget/forecast in connection with the sluggish hardware business were also recorded for product-related services.

211. In this regard, the Retail segment profited in particular from the efforts of large-scale global enterprises to standardize their IT infrastructures. Actual sales surpassed the projected figures by 2%. A slight positive planning deviation was recorded for the hardware business (+0.2%). Sales increases were recorded, especially for POS systems and for automated self-checkout systems. The Software division improved significantly (+7.1%) compared with the plan. There was an upturn in business especially with service station companies and POS software which had a more positive effect than expected on turnover.

212. R&D expenses ran slightly over budget (+3.5%). Expenses of the Banking division in 2013/14 were slightly below budget (EUR -2.2m). Unutilized budget capacity for banking line products was principally used in the Retail division (+ EUR 5.6m) in order to promote customized products and to drive the development of innovative products.

213. The selling and administration expenses in 2013/14 were 8.1% or EUR 25.6m less than budgeted, which is chiefly attributable to the fact that other operating income from the disposal of the production facility in Singapore is included therein. The selling and administration expenses line includes a net effect of EUR 20m (earnings of EUR 26m less selling and administration expenses and cost of sales of EUR 6m). One third of the sales proceeds were allocated to the Retail segment and two thirds to the Banking segment.

214. The targets were met at the earnings level. However – as described above – the EBITA included the sale of manufacturing facilities in Singapore (+ EUR 20m; adjusted for ancillary purchase costs and other related expenses). The underlying EBITA, adjusted for one-time effects, thus amounted to EUR 135m, which is 12.9% below budget.

57

PwC

215. It was assumed that sales revenue for the 2014/2015 fiscal year would remain the same as that for the preceding fiscal year. The company, however, failed to meet its sales targets (-1.5%).

216. Its failure to meet its planned sales targets was chiefly attributable to the fact that shipments to important emerging market countries, in particular, to Brazil, Russia and China, did not go ahead as planned. The business environment deteriorated considerably over the first two quarters of the fiscal year in key emerging market countries. Investors also only regained their appetite to invest in the European market, which was of paramount importance to Wincor Nixdorf, at a slower pace than expected, and this was accompanied by an ongoing deterioration in prices. As early as the beginning of April 2015, Wincor Nixdorf therefore called for a revision of its sales and earnings targets and for the initiation of a restructuring program Delta (cf. 3. III. 1). Planned acquisitions which failed to materialize also resulted in further negative deviations from the budget.

217. The Retail segment was adversely affected by tentative investment spending on the part of large retail companies, particularly in Europe (-5.5%). The growth rates in the growth markets also lagged behind budget projections. Net sales also deviated markedly from the budgeted targets in Germany (-13.2%). This was especially due to the mistaken assumption that the company would continue its strong performance from the preceding fiscal year into 2014/2015. All told, the deviation is chiefly attributable to the hardware business (-12.2%) which experienced a drop in net sales of POS systems.

218. The cost of sales at the Group level grew, compared to the planning, disproportionately faster than net sales (+4.3% or EUR 82m). This increase was primarily due to the restructuring expenses in the amount of EUR 55m included in the cost of sales. The currency effects also influenced the cost of sales.

219. R&D expenses for 2014/2015 ran below budget by 9.5% (-EUR 9.4m). This was also due to 20 employees being retrenched in this area and the company facing restructuring costs in the amount of EUR 4m. In addition, the Group’s targets were not met that year, which resulted in less variable remuneration in the area of human resources. Expenses for the development of the CINEO product line, which had been a key driver of R&D expenditures in previous years, also fell.

220. The underlying EBITA at the group level amounted to EUR 21.9m (-83.8%). In this result, however, restructuring effects in the amount of EUR 80m were also included, of which EUR 62m and EUR 18m incurred in the Banking segment and Retail segment, respectively. Without these one-time effects, the planned sales targets would have been missed by EUR 33.1m or 24.5%.

221. The budget plans for 2015/2016 and the previous third-quarter forecast for 2015/2016 were made available to us for the purpose of assessing the plausibility of the planned figures. Unlike the target-actual analysis shown in the table above, the following table firstly derives the EBITAs before one-time effects and transactions expenses due to the business combination with Diebold. Thereafter, restructuring expenses and other one-time effects as well as transactions expenses due to the business combination with Diebold Inc. are deduced. The forecast expects that the net sales targets of the budget will be achieved and, to some extent, outperformed (+1.6%), a performance mainly attributable to the Retail division (+3.5%).

58

PwC

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Plan/Forecast analysis 2015/2016

	FY 2015/2016						Deviation
[in mEUR]	Budget			Forecast			Absolute			Relative
Net sales Banking		1,545			1,550			5			0.3	%
Net sales Retail		995			1,030			35			3.5	%
Total net sales		2,540			2,580			40			1.6	%
Cost of sales		(1,970	)		(1,960	)		10			-0.5	%
Gross profit		570			620			50			8.8	%
Research & development expenses		(98	)		(100	)		(2	)		2.0	%
Selling, general and administration expenses		(322	)		(330	)		(8	)		2.5	%
EBITA Banking (before one-time effects and transaction expenses)		110			135			25			22.7	%
EBITA Retail (before one-time effects and transaction expenses)		40			55			15			37.5	%
Total EBITA (before one-time effects and transaction expenses)		150			190			40			26.7	%
Restructuring expenses		-40			-20			20			-50.0	%
Other one-time effects		—			25			25			n/a
Total EBITA (incl. one-time effects before transaction expenses)		110			195			85			77.3	%
Transaction expenses business combination Diebold		—			-50			(50	)		n/a
Total EBITA (incl. one-time effects and transaction expenses)		110			145			35			31.8	%
Gross profit as % of net sales		22.4	%		24.0	%
R&D as % of net sales		3.9	%		3.9	%
SG&A as % of net sales		12.7	%		12.8	%
EBITA Banking (before one-time effects and transaction expenses) in % of net sales		7.1	%		8.7	%
EBITA Retail (before one-time effects and transaction expenses) in % of net sales		4.0	%		5.3	%
EBITA (before one-time effects and transaction expenses) in % of net sales		5.9	%		7.4	%
EBITA (after one-time effects and transaction expenses) in % of net sales		4.3	%		5.6	%
EBITA (incl. one-time effects before transaction expenses) in % of net sales		4.3	%		7.6	%

Source: Company data, consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

222. The forecast shows that the hardware business has improved its profit margins in both segments by once again achieving economies of scale. The Retail segment has also seen a significant rise in demand following a weak performance in the preceding fiscal year. Within the banking environment, this trend is further bolstered by the fact that a wide range of attractive banking products is available in Europe (a high proportion of high-end systems). The R&D project-related expenses are slightly above the budget forecast. The selling and administration expenses are above budget on account of increased variable selling expenses and due to the expected increase in variable income underpinned by the positive outlook. The restructuring measures also had a more rapid impact than expected, whereby the EBITA (before restructuring expenses, other one-time and transaction expenses stemming from the business combination with Diebold Inc.) exceeded the amounts originally budgeted by 26.7%. The one-time effects include unplanned income deriving from the acquisition of Brink‘s Nederland B.V., Houten, Netherlands („Brink’s“) in the amount of EUR 10m as well as the non-recurring income from the partially sale of the Chinese business in the amount of EUR 15m. In addition, the restructuring expenses of the program Delta have turned out to be much lower than projected. According to the forecast, only EUR 20m of EUR 40m originally earmarked for restructuring expenses will be expected. According to the forecast the resulting EBITA (after one-time effects) amounts to EUR 195m (before transaction expenses) and is thus EUR 85m ahead of budget, which represents a positive deviation of 77.3% from the budget. The budget also did not include the transaction expenses for the business combination with Diebold Inc.. Hence, the EBITA (after one-time effects and transaction expenses) amounted to EUR 145m.

223. The analysis of the accuracy of previous forecasts revealed that the deviations in sales volumes are largely attributable to the fallouts from the financial and debt crisis, as well as the difficult market environment, especially in the various emerging market countries. The fixed cost nature of essential expense items along with the one-time expenses incurred in connection with the restructuring program prevented the

59

PwC

EBITA target from being met, especially in 2014/2015. Based on the current state of information, for fiscal year 2015/2016 slight increases in net sales are expected, whereas the EBITA is predicted to deviate from projections significantly. Despite these deviations, both downwards and upwards, from the plan, which for the most part are based on the unexpected economic situation, we consider the planning process suitable for the purpose of conducting the business valuation.

II. Anticipated net distributions from the operating business

1. Earnings before Interest and Income Taxes (EBITA) over the detailed planning period

Group operational plan

224. The earnings forecast for the detailed planning period is based on the current forecast for 2015/2016, which we have analyzed in detail and subjected to a plausibility check. The assumptions for the detailed planning period are described below.

225. As in the case of analyzing the past, the analysis and plausibility check of the consolidated earnings forecast has been performed at group level. In addition, we have analyzed the operational plans for the individual Wincor Nixdorf business segments, regions and business streams.

226. The future earnings before interest, taxes and amortization of goodwill (EBITA) forecasts pertaining to the detailed planning period presented to us by Wincor Nixdorf are set out below. First, an EBITA figure adjusted for one-time effects is computed to facilitate a comparison of the various years. The one-time effects are then explained and added in to arrive at an unadjusted EBITA figure. For comparative purposes, we have presented adjusted income statement figures for fiscal year 2014/2015 first:

60

PwC

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Group earnings planning
	FY 2014/2015			FY 2015/2016			FY 2016/2017			FY 2017/2018			CAGR
[in mEUR]	Actual			FC			Planned			Planned			2014/2015 - 2017/2018
Net sales		2,427			2,580			2,620			2,765			4.4	%
Cost of sales		(1,938	)		(1,960	)		(1,993	)		(2,088	)		2.5	%
Gross profit		489			620			627			677			11.5	%
Research & development expenses		(86	)		(100	)		(108	)		(115	)		10.2	%
Selling, general and administration expenses		(301	)		(330	)		(329	)		(342	)		4.3	%
EBITA (adjusted)		102			190			190			220			29.2	%
Restructuring expenses		(80	)		(20	)		—			—			n.a.
Other one-time effects		—			25			—			—			n.a.
EBITA (incl. one-time effects, before transaction expenses)		22			195			190			220			115.4	%
Transaction expenses business combination Diebold		—			(50	)		—			—			n.a.
EBITDA (incl. one-time effects and transaction expenses)		22			145			190			220			115.4	%
Amortization/depreciation of intangible and tangible assets and write-down of reworkable service parts		54			61			71			82			14.9	%
EBITDA (incl. one-time effects and transaction expenses)		76			206			261			302			58.4	%
EBITDA (incl. one-time effects, before transaction expenses)		76			256			261			302			58.4	%
Net sales growth		n.a.			6.3	%		1.6	%		5.5	%
Gross profit as % of net sales		20.1	%		24.0	%		23.9	%		24.5	%
R&D as % of net sales		-3.5	%		-3.9	%		-4.1	%		-4.2	%
SG&A as % of net sales		-12.4	%		-12.8	%		-12.6	%		-12.4	%
EBITA (adjusted) as % of net sales		4.2	%		7.4	%		7.3	%		8.0	%
EBITA (incl. one-time effects, before transaction expenses) as % of net sales		0.9	%		7.6	%		7.3	%		8.0	%
EBITA (incl. one-time effects and transaction expenses) as % of net sales		0.9	%		5.6	%		7.3	%		8.0	%
EBITDA (incl. one-time effects and transaction expenses) as % of net sales		3.1	%		8.0	%		10.0	%		10.9	%
EBITDA (incl. one-time effects, before transaction expenses) as % of net sales		3.1	%		9.9	%		10.0	%		10.9	%

Source: Company data, consolidated financial statements, Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

227. The management of Wincor Nixdorf plans to increase net sales from EUR 2,427m in 2014/2015 to EUR 2,765m in 2017/2018. This corresponds to an average annual growth rate of 4.4%. Thus, after two years during which sales were more or less unchanged or even saw a decline (0.2% in 2013/2014 and -1.7% in 2014/2015), Wincor Nixdorf expects to see growth gain new momentum. The slackening of the rate of sales growth in 2016/2017 is largely attributable to the exceptionally high level of growth indicated in the current forecast for 2015/2016. In considering the sales growth, it is essential to Wincor Nixdorf plans to achieve non-organic growth in the coming years, representing a key growth driver.

228. In regional terms, growth is spread in a relatively homogeneous manner across the regions that Wincor Nixdorf distinguishes between. As in the past, the share of net sales accounted for by Germany and America is forecast to remain more or less constant. In contrast to the historical trend, which saw the Asia/Pacific/Africa region increase its shares of total net sales compared with Europe (without Germany), the forecast now indicates a reversed situation. This is largely attributable to the expected recovery in Eastern Europe as well as the relatively difficult market situation in Asia, especially to the sale of the Chinese unit (cf. 4. I. 1).

61

PwC

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

229. The planned transformation process that is to result in the company focusing more on the software/services field is evident from the net sales forecast. The current share of 58% of total net sales is, for example, to be increased to 61% in subsequent fiscal years. This means that the historical trend will continue. Nevertheless, it still holds that Wincor Nixdorf continues to attach great importance to the hardware business and considers it to be a key component of the overall business and of the future success of the group.

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

230. Net sales are forecast to remain on a similar level for both the Banking and Retail segments, so that with the exception of the fiscal year 2014/2015, in which Retail net sales plunged, no further significant changes in the corresponding shares of net sales are expected.

62

PwC

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

Banking segment forecast

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

231. According to the current 2015/2016 forecast, Banking segment net sales are to decline by -2.0% compared with the preceding fiscal year (EUR 32m). The reason for the decline is the termination of two lossmaking service agreements with major US banks that Wincor Nixdorf withdrew from in connection with the restructuring program Delta. The two agreements accounted for about EUR 50m in sales and the other sales growth, as expected, fails to make up for the losses. Over the two subsequent fiscal years, Wincor Nixdorf plans to achieve growth of 1.9% and 5.1%, which would result in an average annual growth of 1.6% over the entire planning horizon.

63

PwC

232. Banking segment net sales are spread across the regions of Germany, Europe (without Germany), Asia/Pacific/Africa and America as follows: The German home market has traditionally played an important part in generating net sales (2014/2015: 25.0% and 2017/2018: 22.8%). However, as a result of saturation, it is assumed that net sales will decline from EUR 396m in 2014/2015 to EUR 379m in 2017/2018. European net sales are posting the strongest growth, especially as a result of the European emerging market countries. They will increase from 37.4% in 2014/2015 to 42.0% in 2017/2018. Asia/Pacific/Africa accounted for a share of 22.0% (EUR 348m) in 2014/2015, which will even decline to 19.9% (EUR 331m) in relative terms. As expected, the American market is experiencing moderate growth in absolute terms. In relative terms, its share of net sales will decrease from 15.5% in 2014/2015 (EUR 246m) to 15.2% in 2017/2018 (EUR 253m).

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

233. On the mature German market, 2015/2016 net sales were projected to remain on about the same level as in the preceding fiscal year. As a result of the reduction of the order volume existing customers in the outsourcing area that cannot be offset by new business, net sales in 2016/2017 will decrease by 3.8%. However, significant growth – to be attained through acquisitions as well – is projected for software and services. According to information provided by the management, the acquisition target for 2015/2016 will not, however, be fully met. This is reflected in investments, net sales and earnings in the latest forecast for 2015/2016. Given the general stagnation on the German market (cf. Market and Competition), net sales in the following fiscal year 2017/2018 will also fall slightly, by 0.3%.

234. After steep declines in net sales in Europe (without Germany) in the past, the region is projected to see significant growth in banking business once again. Net sales in Europe (without Germany) are set to grow relatively uniformly over the entire planning horizon at a CAGR for 2014/2015-2017/2018 of 5.6%. The key growth drivers in Europe are the gradual consolidation of the banking market and the fact that banks are increasingly focus on new trends such as digitalization, branch transformation and “supported self-service” (self-service supported by a bank advisor where necessary). The postponing of hardware purchases by many banking customers because of the banking crisis has had a negative impact. Consequently, only modest growth is forecast for the hardware business area. Overall, the assumption is that such growth will come from the sale of high-end products rather than from an increase in the number

64

PwC

of units sold. However, it is also assumed that business in some regions will pick up significantly. Italy and Spain are expected to continue to see massive competition, resulting in hardware sales stagnating and lower growth in the software and services field. Solid growth is forecast for the software/services business area in the core market of Europe. Growth is particularly expected to come from the acquisition strategy in the high margin software business area and associated services.

235. In 2015/2016, net sales in the Asia/Pacific region are to decline by 22.6% to EUR 229m. This effect is, however, largely due to a very good 2014/2015 in Australia, when a large hardware rollout came to an end. In both the following planning years, net sales are to rise by 11.4% and 7.5% to EUR 274m in 2017/2018, reflecting the dynamic course of business in the Asia/Pacific region (cf. Market and Competition). However, because of the pressure on prices in the Asia/Pacific region, the hardware business is forecast to decline. While growth in managed services was assumed in the services business area during the planning process – the unit reductions in the hardware field will nevertheless result in services net sales falling because of product-related services. In keeping with the Wincor Nixdorf strategy, growth of about 20% is projected for software and professional services – growth that is to be partly attained non-organically as well. Companies in China are being systematically prevented from obtaining market access (cf. 4 I. 1.). Net sales and earnings effects are taken into account in the forecast, based on the third quarter. A further reason is a delay with a project in Malaysia that was scheduled for 2015/2016.

236. Net sales in the Africa region are to grow moderately from EUR 52m in 2014/2015 to EUR 57m in 2017/2018 (CAGR 2014/2015-2017/2018: 3.1%). The net sales in Africa are largely achieved through relatively risk-free, partner-based business – Wincor Nixdorf only has branches of its own in Morocco and Algeria. Declining commodity prices constitute an economic risk for the region Africa as they have a relatively strong impact on regional purchasing power, affecting the demand for products and services of Wincor Nixdorf.

237. In North America, net sales are to rise by 8.8% from EUR 136m in 2014/2015 to EUR 148m in 2015/2016. In 2016/2017, net sales are to fall sharply to EUR 115m, which corresponds to a decrease of 22.3% in total. One of the reasons for this is the termination of two lossmaking service agreements with major US banks (see above) and which could not be offset by new business in 2016/2017. Growth is not expected to be posted again until 2017/2018. From 2014/2015 until 2017/2018, the North American banking business is set to contract by an average of 2.0% per year. Essentially, however, the moderate trend in North America is also due to the fact that there Wincor Nixdorf finds itself operating on the home market of two major competitors that have strong business relationships with many commercially robust regional banks in the country and achieve particular success in selling their products there. By contrast, major American banks behave in a very price-sensitive manner and expect a reliable, countrywide service organization, which is something that market entrants find relatively difficult to guarantee in a country that covers such a large area.

238. Following a modest fiscal year 2014/2015, Latin America is projected to experience a further decrease to EUR 97m for 2015/2016 as a result of increased pressure on prices. Significant growth rates of 20.6% and 6.8% are forecast for subsequent fiscal years 2016/2017 and 2017/2018. This corresponds to a CAGR of 4.4% for the period 2014/2015 through 2017/2018. Compared with the Latin American growth in the installed base (CAGR 2014-2020: 0.7%), new installations (CAGR 2014-2020: 5.7%) and IT expenditure in the banking sector (CAGR 2014-2019: 3.9%), this growth seems to be relatively ambitious (cf. Market and Competition). The growth is particularly attributable to Brazil and Mexico, for which, despite difficult

65

PwC

economic conditions that continue to be reflected in exchange rates and impact purchasing power, solid growth is projected again. The growth drivers are the expansion of branch networks as well as the replacing of existing hardware with new, high-end systems (multifunctional and recycling systems). By contract, the forecast for Venezuela is flat for political risk reasons.

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

239. Following a poor 2014/2015 (cf. Net Assets, Financial Position and Results of Operations), hardware net sales are set to decline again for 2015/2016, falling from EUR 626m to EUR 618m. Subsequently, hardware net sales are forecast to decline: In 2016/2017, they are set to fall by 0.8% to EUR 613m and, in the following year (2017/2018), by a further 0.8% to EUR 608m (CAGR 2014/2015-2017/2018: -1.0%). Management assumes that pressure on prices and a stagnating installed base, especially in the core European markets (cf. Market and Competition), will lead to margin erosion in this business area. To arrest the decline in prices (at least partially), hardware devices are being continually upgraded to ensure they are state of the art or are being provided with additional functionality (e.g., cash recycling). Despite modest growth prospects, the hardware area will continue to be of strategic importance for Wincor Nixdorf in the future too: It is particularly needed in order to be perceived as a competent partner for questions related to branch software and automation and to use such vehicle for the specific purpose of offering higher margin services and software. To remain successful in a predatory international competitive environment, Wincor Nixdorf is increasingly counting on standardization and a reduced vertical range of production. For example, some parts of tool production have been sold and sheet metal production has been adjusted.

240. New trends such as digitalization and multichannel strategies are giving a boost to the market in the area of software and professional services. In particular, IT expenditure on the part of retail banks is deemed to be on the rise worldwide (cf. Market and Competition). Wincor Nixdorf has responded in this area by further developing its portfolio and endeavoring to assume the role of a provider of comprehensive solutions for hardware installation and operation. To achieve further growth in this area, Wincor Nixdorf is planning to pursue acquisitions that are intended to make a significant contribution to the company’s growth strategy. The business area is set to grow by 4.8% in 2015/2016 and by 12.9% in

66

PwC

each of the following years. This corresponds to a CAGR (2014/2015-2017/2018) of 10.1%, with professional services in particular making a greater contribution to growth (CAGR 11.5%). As software and professional services are high-end products with corresponding margins, the successive expansion of business operations in this area is planned for mature and developed markets above all. The approach is based on the strategy to first enter the market with hardware products and in a later stage move the product and services portfolio in the direction of high-end services and software. In the software field, opportunities and risks particularly reside in the further development of existing software solutions. There continues to be a risk that no suitable candidates for further acquisition projects can be found in this area.

241. The trend in services net sales is essentially stable (CAGR 2014/2015-2017/2018: 0.9%). Net sales are, however, adversely affected by an one-time effect: In 2015/2016, the services business area will see a loss in net sales resulting from the termination of the two lossmaking service agreements with major US banks (see above). This decrease will particularly impact net sales for so-called product-related services, which will decrease by EUR 35m from 2014/2015 to EUR 421m in 2015/2016 (-7.7%). Net sales for the services area will therefore contract by EUR 35m in total to EUR 691m, which corresponds to a decrease of 4.8%. Despite solid growth rates in the two following years (2016/2017: 0.6%, 2017/2018: 7.2%), the level of net sales for the services business area at the end of the planning period will amount to EUR 745m and will therefore only slightly exceed the level for 2014/2015 (EUR 726m). With regard to product services, which are heavily dependent on the hardware business, Wincor Nixdorf forecasts relatively stable net sales. As a result of the two large orders that were lost, this growth will not appear until 2017/2018, for which growth of 4.9% is forecast (CAGR 2014/2015-2017/2018: -2.3%).

242. Wincor Nixdorf forecasts high growth rates for the managed services and outsourcing business area (which also includes the operation of networks and IT infrastructure). After 2015/2016, the two business areas will grow by 7.4% and 10.3% in fiscal years 2016/2017 and 2017/2018. In the case of managed services, Wincor Nixdorf is trying to particularly profit from the potential in developed European countries and to thus continue the pursuit of its growth strategy (cf. Market and Competition). Topics such as monitoring, cash management and extended help desk services are seen as possible drivers in this regard. In subsequent years, Wincor Nixdorf plans to expand managed services outside Europe too.

243. Outsourcing solutions are offered in Germany, the Netherlands and the UK with a primary focus on Germany. For 2015/2016, a reduction in the contract volume of existing customers in the IT outsourcing area is forecast. New agreement will not completely make up for this, causing net sales to decline by 0.9%. Such reductions are not foreseen for subsequent years. It is in fact assumed that this business can be successively expanded in existing outsourcing countries over the coming years. Net sales are to increase by 7.0% to EUR 230m in 2016/2017 and by 10.9% to EUR 255m in 2017/2018.

244. In addition to the classic Wincor Nixdorf business areas, the Banking segment also includes business with postal companies: As such customers are mostly public companies, projects are almost exclusively awarded by way of public tender procedures. This results in lower margins than in the regular Banking segment. The postal business is heavily dependent on individual projects overall and accounts for about 5% of the total net sales of the Banking segment.

67

PwC

245. In our estimation, the net sales forecast for the segment as a whole is comprehensible and plausible. In the software and services area, high growth rates also seem realistic against a backdrop of increasing cost pressures and the rising self-service share. The growth in the software segment is also due to non-organic growth. However, the growth in this area is to be non-organic as well. As according to Wincor Nixdorf no company acquisition is in an advanced stage, we consider the growth projected for software segment to be quite ambitious. By contrast, in our opinion the projections for the hardware area, with modest or even negative growth, to be realistic – the opportunities and risks are reflected in a balanced manner.

Retail segment forecast

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

246. According to the current forecast, the Retail segment is to see net sales rise by a substantial 21.9% in fiscal year 2015/2016 after declining by 6.4% from 2013/2014 to 2014/2015. Thus, the current forecast is slightly above the level of the projected budget.

247. The significant increase in fiscal year 2015/2016 is largely attributable to the shifting of extensive investment in hardware of major European retailers to the fiscal year 2015/2016 and the subsequent years. The fiscal year 2014/2015 saw a persistent reluctance to invest their investment budgets, a reluctance dropped in fiscal year 2015/2016. This was reflected in the decrease in net sales in previous fiscal year 2014/2015. From a group perspective, this means that the current fiscal year is seeing a shift toward European hardware net sales in the Retail segment when compared with the preceding fiscal year.

248. Given the significant increase in the 2015/2016 forecast, growth of 1.0% and 6.3% is projected for subsequent fiscal years 2016/2017 and 2017/2018. Thus, the segment growth with a CAGR of 9.4% (2014/15-2017/18) indicated by Wincor Nixdorf is higher than the market growth in global retail sector expenditure that is to average 3.8% over the period 2015-2020. However, the average annual growth rate from 2013/2014 as relevant (normalized) base year to 2017/2018 amounts to 5.2%. The fact that the expected growth exceeds the expected growth in the market is due to both the planned non-organic growth and the dynamic development of the cashless payment business (AEVI), which is included in the retail segment.

68

PwC

249. AEVI is forecast to generate a stand-alone net sales contribution of EUR 150m (including group-internal sales) in 2017/2018 (net sales 2014/2015: EUR 49m). With an average annual growth rate of 45% AEVI is a key driver for the growth in the segment sales of EUR 150m (i.e., including internal group sales) in 2017/2018 (2014/2015 net sales: EUR 49m). Hardware (about 45%) and software/services (about 55%) are to account for the bulk of the net sales.

250. By region, it is apparent that Germany and Europe (without Germany) are the most important markets for the segment. However, America as a region is increasingly gaining in importance and is to post the highest anticipated rate of growth. What is striking is the marginal importance of the Asia/Pacific/Africa region, which will be discussed below.

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

251. Regarding Germany, growth is to be slightly lower than originally budgeted according to the current forecast. The current forecast envisages an increase from EUR 159m to EUR 185m for 2015/2016. Growth averaging 14.1% per year is forecast through 2017/2018. The software area is the main driver in this regard. Given the expected steep rise in net sales for 2015/2016, Wincor Nixdorf is well on the way to achieving the targets declared for the region.

252. For the rest of Europe (without Germany) is forecast to post growth of 17.8% for 2015/2016. This is mainly attributable to the postponement of hardware investment by European retailers until the current fiscal year. Growth of 3.9% and 7.6% is forecast for the following years and is to primarily derive from further software growth, especially in France, the United Kingdom and the Scandinavian countries. In addition, above-average growth is expected in the Polish and Russian service station business.

253. The forecast anticipates growth of 34.8% in the Asia/Pacific/Africa region. The service station business is expected to post a significant increase in Africa in particular. The positive trend in the AEVI business in Australia also plays a key role in this regard. It is assumed that the business will decline in subsequent fiscal years (-30.3% in 2016/2017 and -3.2% in 2017/2018). The main reasons cited for the decline are fierce competition in the hardware area and low demand for software, which is mainly supplied by local providers. Thus, Wincor Nixdorf can only participate in market growth in the Asian region on a minor scale in the Retail segment. In addition, analysts too expect the momentum for software and services growth to primarily come from industrialized countries instead of emerging markets.

69

PwC

254. According to the current forecast, business in America is predicted more positively than previously budgeted (7% above budget). The reasons for this are better than anticipated business with some key accounts in Canada as well as a new cooperation in the Retail segment in the United States. Consequently, it is likely that the targets for 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 will be exceeded. The positive trend in America will make up for a likely shortfall in Germany as a region, so that at least the net sales targets indicated by Wincor Nixdorf can be attained with regard to the 2015/2016 forecast.

255. The plan assumptions posit a general decline in hardware prices. It is assumed that this can be offset by high-end configurations. That is why moderate growth is expected in this area. As a result of the shift in hardware net sales from fiscal year 2014/2015 to 2015/2016, growth of 27.8% is forecast initially. A decrease of about 10.7% is expected in fiscal year 2016/2017 as a result of the exceptional level for the preceding year. In the following year, growth should amount to 2.9% again and result in net sales in the amount of EUR 457m. Thus, the level of net sales for hardware will be slightly above the level for fiscal years 2012/2013 and 2013/2014. The growth assumptions also take account of the trend in new installations of EPOS systems in the important Wincor Nixdorf domestic markets of Germany and Europe, which tend to see a moderate rise in Europe and even a decline in Germany. Global growth tends to be associated with the Asia region, in which Wincor Nixdorf has traditionally occupied a weaker position and where there is intense competition over prices. Wincor Nixdorf primarily sees sustained growth in the SCO (Self Checkout) and RVS (Reverse Vending System) areas. However, in contrast to the United States, acceptance of self checkout devices is still relatively low in Europe. The leaders in Europe are countries such as the United Kingdom, France and Switzerland. Market acceptance in Germany, however, is still not very pronounced. Because of their dependency on environmental standards, RVS systems are also only used more widely in individual countries. They include the Nordics (Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden) in addition to Germany. A further important driver of the net sales of hardware is the business with AEVI, which generates about 45% of its net sales from hardware sales of the “Albert” device.

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

70

PwC

256. In the most recent 2015/2016 forecast, the product-related services business was above the original budget. As a result, net sales are expected to be up 12.9% on the level for the previous fiscal year. The better performance means that the level for fiscal year 2016/2017 has already been exceeded, with the result that a decrease of 2.3% is expected. In final planning year 2017/2018, net sales are to rise by 6.2%. Thus, future growth will be above that for the hardware business. The further services business consisting in managed services and outsourcing is growing relatively robustly from the current low level of EUR 82m for 2014/2015. For subsequent years, growth of 41.5% is assumed for 2015/2016, of 34.5% for 2016/2017 and of 16.7% for 2017/2018. The reasons for the growth include non-organic growth through the acquisition of Brink‘s (see below) as well as the dynamic market environment with a rising IT budget share in this area. According to the current forecast, the software business will be off budget (-11%). This is mainly attributable to the orders lost in Germany as already indicated above. Nevertheless, growth of 9.2% is still expected, indicating the growth potential in this area. Overall, the software/services area is projected to post an average growth rate of 12.4% per year. That significantly exceeds market expectations, which lie in the high single-digit percentage range. Analysts also expect the momentum for software and services growth to primarily come from industrialized countries rather than from emerging markets. Consequently, Wincor Nixdorf is very well positioned for this year with its robust presence in the industrialized countries. Given the efforts currently being made by Wincor Nixdorf to achieve growth in software/services, such as efforts that are in part defined in the program Delta and non-organic growth, indicate that the planning assumptions are not implausible.

257. The service station business (including services) accounts for between 8% and 10% of the total net sales for Retail and, because of the higher margin product mix, makes a somewhat disproportionately higher contribution to total earnings. Growth is viewed as being primarily attainable in Europe and in North-America.

258. In our estimation, the net sales forecast for the Retail segment is entirely realistic. Given the market trend for SCOs, further growth seems to be possible in the hardware area in particular, with the result that historical levels can be attained and exceeded despite competition and price sensitivity. After taking into account the additional new business with AEVI, which is to contribute EUR 150m to net sales in 2017/2018 and with hardware accounting for about 45% of that figure, the targets that Wincor Nixdorf has set for the hardware area appear to be completely realizable. Taking into account market trends and the contribution to be made in this regard by AEVI, the high growth in the software/services areas also appears to be not implausible.

Cost forecast

259. The gross margin in the 2015/2016 forecast is to rise by 3.9 percentage points to 24.0%. This marked rise is largely attributable to the anticipated full impact of the program Delta rather than the larger share accounted for by higher margin products. The high margin professional services and software business in particular will be expanded in the future.

71

PwC

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

260. The ratio of research and development costs to net sales will increase slightly over the planning period to 4.2% in fiscal year 2017/2018. Research and development will be expanded in the software field above all, while the level for software will largely remain constant. The greater part pertains to the Banking segment while the ratio to net sales for the Retail segment is disproportionately high because of its smaller size. Research and development activities are essential for a technology company like Wincor Nixdorf. The fact that the restructuring program itself provides for an increase in the share accounted for by research and development in the future highlights the importance of this area for the future success of the group.

261. Under the 2015/2016 forecast, selling and administration expenses are expected to rise to 12.8% and will therefore lie slightly above the comparative historical level of 11.8% to 12.7%. The reason for the extraordinary increase is inter alia the current over-fulfillment of the budget in conjunction with disproportionately high variable remunerations.

262. It has also been indicated that administration expenses will also be streamlined as part of the project Delta. This positive effect is essentially also reflected in the projected future trend in selling and administration expenses.

Earnings forecast

263. The gross margin increases over the planning period from 24.0% to 24.5%, but differs in the business segments. Whereas the hardware business struggles with a drop in prices and decreasing gross margins, the margins in the segment software/professional services continue to increase from an already high level. Especially due to the growth in the business for high-quality services (outsourcing and managed services) the services segment is forecast with increasing gross margins compared with the past.

264. As a result of the effects described above, EBITA (before one-time effects: restructuring expenses, one-time effects and transaction costs) is expected to rise by 3.2 percentage points to 7.4% of net sales for 2015/2016. This level is to decline slightly for the subsequent fiscal year to 7.3%. for the final planning year an improvement to 8.0% is projected, an improvement related to the increasing share of higher margin products.

72

PwC

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

265. As has largely been the case in the past, the profitability of the Banking segment is expected to exceed that of the Retail segment over the coming fiscal years. There are various reasons for this. First, banking sector products are more complex. Next, greater economies of scale can be achieved in the banking sector. In addition, the prevalence of greater price sensitivity can be observed in the retail industry.

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

266. Over the coming fiscal years, the profitability of the Retail segment – as presented above – is expected to be below that of the Banking segment.

267. The improvement in the margin over time is to result from the planned move toward higher margin products in the software/services area. A further positive effect is to come from the cashless payments, AEVI, which is included in the Retail segment and has a margin significantly higher than that for the remaining Retail business (plan EBITA margin 2017/2018: 12.2%).

73

PwC

One-time effects

268. Fiscal year 2015/2016 will continue to be affected by the restructuring program Delta. Restructuring expenses in the amount of EUR 20m are expected in connection with it. They are about EUR 20m lower than planned when the restructuring program was launched.

269. The positive One-time effects stem from the purchase of Brink’s, which is to generate income of EUR 10m. The further EUR 15m is to largely come from the sale of the stakes in the Chinese business activities.

Transaction expenses

270. In addition, costs of EUR 50m are expected in the current fiscal year in connection with the merger with Diebold. They mainly comprise external consulting fees, so-called retention fees and (dis-)synergies resulting from the business combination with Diebold Inc.

74

PwC

Capital expenditure and depreciation/amortization

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Investments and depreciation 2014/2015-2017/2018

	FY 2014/2015		FY 2015/2016		FY 2016/2017		FY 2017/2018		CAGR
[in mEUR]	Actual		FC		Planned		Planned		2014/2015 - 2017/2018
Investment in intangible assets and property, plant and equipment		49		53		65		70		12.6	%
Investment in reworkable service parts		7		9		10		10		12.0	%
Maintenance investments		56		62		75		80		12.6	%
Expansion investments (M&A)		—		20		40		40		n.a.
Depreciation		54		61		71		82		14.9	%

Source: Company data, Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

271. Depreciation/amortization is to increase by an average of 14.9% per year over the detailed planning phase. Thus, depreciation/amortization will on average slightly exceed capital expenditure (without investments for non-organic growth), which will range between EUR 56m in 2014/2015 and EUR 80m in 2017/2018 and is projected to grow at an average rate of 12.6%.

272. An additional amount of EUR 40m in 2015/2016 and the two subsequent years is planned for non-organic growth activities. The forecast 2015/2016, assumes expansion investments in the amount of EUR 20m. This deviates from the budget by EUR 20m because the actual acquisition activity was less than originally expected. Significant contributions to the growth strategy of Wincor Nixdorf come from the acquisitions of Brink‘s and Projective NV (besides three minor acquisitions).

273. The deviation from the investment budget means that the sales and profits in the detailed planning period would have to be reduced by the contributions of those planned acquisition activities in 2015/2016 that could not be realized. For 2015/2016 the concrete investment, net sales and EBITA effects of the investment activity are already taken into account in the forecast in an appropriate manner – the planning of the subsequent years 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 principally should be adjusted correspondingly. However, according to management information, for 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 no deviations from the plan are expected as the lacking sales and profit contribution – due to the lower as planned acquisition activities in 2015/2016 – can be offset by organic growth.

274. The investment volumes for 2016/2017 and 2017/2018 contained in the plan have not been altered. An acquisition volume of EUR 40m is assumed for each of the two years, resulting in net sales in the amount of EUR 50m p.a. and an EBITA contribution in the amount of EUR 5m p.a. According to information provided by the management, there are currently no concrete acquisition projects. However, the management has explained that acquisition activity, which has initially been framed in general terms, is an also a component of the Wincor Nixdorf growth strategy and will therefore continue to be pursued. While no significant acquisitions could be executed in 2014/2015, a part of the planned acquisition was realized in 2015/2016. Given the current status, it cannot be ruled out that acquisition goals are not achieved completely or only with further delays. However, as a result of the business model having a clear strategic focus on non-organic growth within the context of the transformation process, we have not made any adjustments to the business plan.

75

PwC

Overall assessment

275. On the basis of the planning documents made available, the information provided, as well as after taking into account external sector and market data, we consider the company operational plan to be in essence suitable for valuation purposes.

276. In the operating business, failure to win orders and tenders is a regular occurrence. This can result in the unit concerned being unable to fulfill the plan. However, this can normally be offset by winning other large orders and tenders, which are not, however, necessarily attributable to the same company/region. The restructuring program Delta was initiated in 2014/2015. This program progresses faster than originally expected. At the same time the cost involved are significantly lower than planned, so that the operating result is positively influenced in 2015/2016. As expected, such effects cancel each other out ultimately in total and over time. Thus, the persons responsible at Wincor Nixdorf do not see this as having significant impact on the planning years 2016/2017 and 2017/2018.

277. The net sales forecast seems plausible to us with regard to the hardware area. Both the declining number of new devices on established markets as well as mounting pressure on prices and competition from Asia preclude any broader based growth; this impacts both segments. That is why we share the view taken by Wincor Nixdorf that hardware growth can now only be expected to come from high-end devices, such as cash-recycling units, SCOs or the “Albert” of AEVI. The Wincor Nixdorf growth assumptions for the software/services area are decidedly more positive. Taking into account the dynamic growth in IT expenditure in these areas as well, we can consider the assumptions to be very credible indeed. Nevertheless, Wincor Nixdorf assumes growth rates in the software segment that are in excess of the market rates. This goal is also to be achieved through non-organic growth. However, as this cannot be given any more concrete form at the present time, and given that other competitors also want to grow non-organically in this area, we consider the goal to be quite ambitious, but – with possible delays resulting from the necessary transaction and integration processes – attainable in essence.

278. We consider the future trend in costs to be plausible. Even if there were several restructuring programs in the past, on the basis of the current trend it can be assumed that – considering the achieved results of the restructuring program Delta – the projected cost ratios will be attained shortly.

2. Determining the contributions to earnings of synergies of relevance for the valuation

279. In determining the anticipated net distributions, additional factors of relevance for the valuation have to be taken into account in the result. This particularly applies to the additional potential for synergies that has not yet been reflected in the plan for fiscal years 2015/2016 through 2018/2019.

280. As at the valuation date, a de facto group relationship exists between Wincor Nixdorf and Diebold Inc. in that even without a valid control agreement, synergy effects can and will also be realized by the Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf subject to such restrictions as are imposed by statute. Pseudo synergies (that is, also those synergies that the Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf can legally realize even if there is no domination agreement) are to be taken into account in determining an objectified business value in accordance with the principles set out in IDW standard S 1 (cf. chapter 2. I.) insofar as the measures giving rise to synergies already have sufficiently concrete form as at the valuation date. By contrast, real

76

PwC

synergies (that is, synergies that cannot be legally realized by the Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf without a control agreement) are not taken into consideration. They can only be obtained after corporate law measures have been implemented and have become effective and therefore cannot be reconciled with the objectified business value requirement (BGHZ 138, 136, 140; BayObLG AG 1996, 127, 128; OLG Stuttgart AG 2000, 428, 429; WP Handbuch 2014, 14th edition, Volume II, A 89 et seqq.).

281. In keeping with this distinction, we have taken into account the pseudo synergies that have been identified in a way that increases the business value.

282. For the purposes of identifying potential synergies, working groups were deployed at both parties. They had the task of identifying specific potential synergies and allocating them to specific measures. In addition, they are to identify the earnings potential of individual measures and to quantify the costs that need to be incurred to realize the respective synergies. The working groups also analyzed and forecast when the synergies and costs were to arise.

283. For valuation purposes, it remained necessary to convert the synergy target values for the respective measures into expectation values. This is to reflect the fact that individual measures might not be realized or not realized in full because of uncertainty. The working parties also assessed the likelihood of realization. They based their assessment on factors such as the implementation risk for a measure and whether cost or net sales synergies were involved, as the risk for net sales synergies tends to be higher. In addition, the current planning status of each of the measures also plays a role (“Degree of Implementation,” DoI). The implicit assumption is that the successful implementation of a measure is likelier the closer it is to realization. Essentially, the DoI differs from 0 to 5 – the range extends from just “objectives” to “P&L effect achieved.” At the time the valuation work was conducted, just under 70% of the measures still had DoI 1 status and therefore related to synergy potential estimates as well as the drafting of an action plan stage. Thus, there was still no evaluation and bottom-up planning of the synergy objectives.

284. To separate the Wincor Nixdorf pseudo synergies of relevance to the valuation from those arising at Diebold Inc., the potential synergies were split up according to partner. This process was based on the analyses of the working group and was presented to us in aggregated form.

285. In total, the parties expect that after the expiry of the third year following the consummation of the takeover bid (2018/2019), it will be possible to realize yearly synergy effects in the total amount of about USD 160m (about EUR 150m). Thus, the synergies will only be realized in full one year after the Wincor Nixdorf detailed planning period (through 2017/2018). To fully include the synergy potential of relevance to the valuation in our valuation, we “technically” extended the detailed projection by an additional period (2018/2019). This additional period takes account of the pseudo synergies that it is assumed will be realized in full by that time and were otherwise derived on the basis of the assumptions regarding a sustainable result from the final detailed planning year 2017/2018.

286. In accordance with the approach described above, the entire anticipated synergy potential from the merger in the amount of EUR 150m produces a value of 16 per year for Wincor Nixdorf as of fiscal year 2018/2019 and which can be classified as a pseudo synergy attributable to Wincor Nixdorf. As mentioned above (cf. note 270), the forecast includes the (dis-)synergies and realization costs accruing in 2015/2016 under transaction expenses due to business combination with Diebold Inc..

77

PwC

Synergies relevant for valuation and one-time realization costs

[in mEUR]	2015/2016			2016/2017			2017/2018			2018/2019			TV
Sales synergies		(6	)		(11	)		(8	)		4			4
Cost of sales synergies		1			8			10			11			11
SG&A synergies		0			0			1			1			1
Realization costs		(1	)		(5	)		(3	)		(0	)
Total		(6	)		(8	)		0			15			16

Source: Company data and PwC analysis

287. In essence, the synergy effects identified result from the following areas:

• Product consolidation

• Streamlining of services in overlapping regions

• Better purchasing conditions

They can be allocated as follows to individual items in the income statement:

288. Sales-related pseudo synergies particularly arise from the product consolidation being sought, whereby Wincor Nixdorf retail products will be distributed via the Diebold Inc. distribution network and, in addition, the combining of service networks. In contrast to these potential synergies, there are dis-synergies resulting from the strategic purchasing behavior of the customers of the two companies if products, software and services are to be sourced from two (or more) different manufacturers due to several reasons and Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf were already to be viewed as one company immediately after the merger.

289. At the level of cost of sales, there are pseudo synergies arising from, on the one hand, the streamlining of services in overlapping regions, as well as from better purchasing conditions in the direct and indirect area.

290. Pseudo synergies at the selling and administration expenses level will particularly arise from better purchasing conditions in the indirect area.

291. The synergy contributions that can only be realized through the further corporate integration of Wincor Nixdorf – through the intended domination agreement, for example – particularly relate to potential synergies connected with corporate structure, e.g., the centralization and/or integration of key corporate functions (including IT, R&D, administration) and are not to be taken into account in the valuation of an objectified business value.

3. Earnings before Interest and Income Taxes (EBITA) as a perpetual annuity

292. To arrive at the earnings before interest, taxes and amortization of goodwill (EBITA) for the period of perpetual annuity, based on the detailed planning period, we estimated the future earning power of the Wincor Nixdorf group assuming it to be a going concern in perpetuity.

78

PwC

293. To this end, the first step to be performed involved the conversion of expected the net sales of the Wincor Nixdorf group for 2017/2018 into a figure for net sales that can be expected to be sustainable. In doing so, we factored in that the hardware business will generally be subject to further pricing pressure on. Given the positive market outlook for the software/services area and taking into account the opportunities and risks, we consider sustainable revenue growth of 0.75% to be reasonable overall (see 4. III. 3.).

294. Next, in a second step, the sustainable net sales forecast were translated into sustainable EBITA. In determining the sustainable EBITA margin, the following factors were taken into consideration in particular.

295. In the past (from 2003/2004 onward), the company saw substantial variation in EBITA margins that reflected macroeconomic trends and business success for a given year.

Wincor Nixdorf -Trends in EBITA margin 2003/2004-2014/2015

[in mEUR]	FY 2003/2004			FY 2004/2005			FY 2005/2006			FY 2006/2007			FY 2007/2008			FY 2008/2009
Net sales		1,576			1,744			1,948			2,145			2,319			2,250
EBITA		116			137			161			186			206			179
EBITA margin [in %]		7.4	%		7.9	%		8.3	%		8.7	%		8.9	%		8.0	%
[in mEUR]	FY 2009/2010			FY 2010/2011			FY 2011/2012			FY 2012/2013			FY 2013/2014			FY 2014/2015			Average 2003/2004 - 2014/2015
Net sales		2,239			2,328			2,343			2,465			2,469			2,427
EBITA		162			162			101			132			155			22
EBITA margin [in %]		7.2	%		7.0	%		4.3	%		5.3	%		6.3	%		0.9	%		6.7	%

Source: Company data, consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

296. Over the period that we analyzed (2003/2004-2014/2015), the (unadjusted) EBITA margin ranged between 0.9% and 8.9%. The 2007/2008 peak values were driven by a booming hardware business. The minimum value resulted from a poor fiscal year 2014/2015 overall and the restructuring. Over the entire period under review from 2003/2004 through 2014/2015, the (unadjusted) EBITA margin averaged 6.7%.

297. For the planning years (2015/2016-2017/2018), the projected EBITA margin (before synergies) is 7.6%, 7.3% und 8.0% respectively. The very positive margin for fiscal year 2015/2016 was largely shaped by the faster than originally anticipated realization of effects from the restructuring program Delta. The margin of 7.6% does not include the transaction costs incurred as a result of the merger with Diebold Inc.. To achieve a margin level of 8.0% in the final detailed planning year, the company assumes a transformation process resulting in software and services accounting for a larger share of business. This transformation process is partly based on non-organic growth that has yet to be given more specific form. In this regard, it is assumed that the EBITA margin for the acquisition targets will exceed that of the Group. Regarding the internally developed cash payment solutions that were combined in a separate unit for cashless payments solutions (AEVI) it is also assumed that it too will make a contribution to net sales and earnings that will grow robustly. This essentially cannot be regarded as implausible – yet assumes a high degree of innovativeness as well as a robust presence on the developing market for cashless payments. At the end of the detailed planning period in 2017/2018, the expected share of total net sales accounted for by hardware will still be 39%. Against a backdrop of fierce competition, especially from the Asian competition and further advances in digitalization, in certain cycles following the detailed planning period too there will be a need for further adjustments to the business model entailing associated costs.

298. The analysis of past trends and the plan forecasts shows, that the derivation of a sustainable average margin must take account of economic and business cycles as well as trends in the market and competitive environment and that the anticipated margin for the final detailed planning year cannot be simply carried forward.

79

PwC

299. Assessing the period from 2012/2013 through 2017/2018 as a representative business cycle, one can derive an average EBITA margin (before synergies) for the six-year period. As a result of the extensive restructuring program Delta entailing one-time costs of EUR 100m over the period as well as transaction expenses for the business combination with Diebold Inc. in the amount of EUR 50m in this time period the effect of adjustment measures necessary in the future could be overestimated in the derivation of the average margin. Against that backdrop, we have calculated the average adjusted EBITA margin. The adjusted EBITA margin amounts to 6.4% over the period under review.

Wincor Nixdorf - Trends in EBITA Margin 2012/2013-2017/2018

	FY 2012/2013 Actual			FY 2013/2014 Actual			FY 2014/2015 Actual			FY 2015/16 FC			FY 2016/17 Planned			FY 2017/18 Planned			Average
Net Sales		2,465			2,469			2,427			2,580			2,620			2,765
EBITA (adjusted)		152			135			102			190			190			220
EBITA margin [in %] (adjusted)		6.1	%		5.5	%		4.2	%		7.4	%		7.3	%		8.0	%		6.4	%

Source: Company data, consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

300. In addition, the further transformation of the business model of Wincor Nixdorf towards a higher proportion of software/services – especially considering the cashless payment unit AEVI – has to be taken into account. The software/services business offers higher margins than the traditional hardware business and is expected to enhance the sustainable margin. The management of Wincor Nixdorf stated a medium-term EBITA margin between 6% and 8% as an objective within in the group strategy. Therefore, we consider an EBITA margin of 7.0% (before synergies) as appropriate. This level of the sustainable average margin assumes both a successful business transformation process as well as – like in the past – fluctuating margins due to the cyclicality of the economic and business situation and the resulting necessary adjustments of the business model.

301. The pseudo synergies taken into account amount to EUR 16m as of 2018/2019 and correspond to an additional margin contribution of about 0.6%. If it is assumed that synergies of this order are also attainable over the longer term, this yields, along with the average EBITA margin of 7.0%, an estimate of a sustainable average EBITA margin of 7.6%.

302. In conclusion and after taking into account all the analyses referred to above, we are of the opinion that an average EBITA margin of 7.6% with consideration of pseudo synergies fairly reflects the average profitability of the operating business that can be expected over the longer term.

303. The forecast includes the (dis-)synergies and realization costs accruing in 2015/2016 under transaction expenses due to business combination with Diebold Inc. (see note 270). Thus, the table below does not show a further breakdown in sales and cost synergies as well as one-time costs. Further, as the synergies will only be realized in full in 2018/2019, we have added a “technical year 2018/2019” that goes beyond the planning period; the technical year is based on the same assumptions as the perpetual annuity. The synergies will be fully realized in technical year 2018/2019. They ultimately entail corresponding one-time costs in the amount of EUR 0.3m – the perpetual annuity only includes synergies of EUR 16m and no one-time costs.

80

PwC

Wincor Nixdorf - Group planning and terminal value (TV) 2015/2016-TV

[in mEUR]	FY 2015/2016 FC			FY 2016/2017 Planned			FY 2017/2018 Planned			2018/2019 techn. Year			TV
Net sales		2,580			2,620			2,765			2,786			2,807
EBITA before synergies (incl. one-time effects and transaction expenses)		145			190			220			195			196
Sales and cost synergies		—			(3	)		3			16			16
One-time costs		—			(5	)		(3	)		(0	)		—
EBITA after synergies (incl. one-time effects and transaction expenses)		145			182			220			210			212
EBITA margin [in % of net sales] before synergies		5.6	%		7.3	%		8.0	%		7.0	%		7.0	%
EBITA margin [in % of net sales] after synergies		5.6	%		6.9	%		8.0	%		7.5	%		7.6	%

Source: Company data, consolidated financial statements, PwC analysis

81

PwC

4. Net distributions after personal income tax

304. Taking the net interest and the income tax of the company and the shareholders into account, we transferred the preceding forecast EBITA series into the expected net distributions to the shareholders. Based on the procedure described below and the assumptions made, the expected net distributions to the shareholders following personal income tax are derived as follows:

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Derivation of net payouts and retained earnings to be discounted

in mEUR	2015/2016 FC			2016/2017 Planned			2017/2018 Planned			2018/2019 techn. Year			2019/2020 TV
EBITA after synergies (incl. one-time effects and transaction costs)		145			182			220			210			212
Sustainable investment for change in net working capital		—			—			—			—			(2	)
Growth-based credit funds increase		—			—			—			—			2
EBITA after synergies and cash flow adjustments TV		145			182			220			210			212
Financial result		(6	)		(6	)		(7	)		(6	)		(5	)
Earnings before tax (EBT)		139			176			214			204			207
Corporate taxes		(38	)		(56	)		(64	)		(57	)		(59	)
Earnings after corporate taxes		101			120			149			147			148
Minority interest		(2	)		(2	)		(3	)		(3	)		(3	)
Earnings after corporate taxes and minority interest		99			118			146			144			144
Retained earnings		(49	)		(59	)		(73	)		(72	)		(72	)
Distributed dividends		49			59			73			72			72
Personal income taxes		(13	)		(16	)		(19	)		(19	)		(19	)
Distributed dividends after personal income taxes		36			43			54			53			53
Fictitious attribution from retained earnings		—			—			—			—			72
Personal income tax on fictitious attribution		—			—			—			—			(10	)
Retainted earnings after personal income taxes		—			—			—			—			63
Net payouts and retained earnings to be discounted		36			43			54			53			116

Source: Wincor Nixdorf forecast calculations, PwC analysis

305. The sustained need for investment in net current assets and the growth-related take-up of credit will ensure a sustainable, reasonable increase in the net current assets along with a stable capital structure. Accompanying the long-term growth of the income statement and the financial surpluses, the growth of the balance sheet items will also be proportionally financed with equity, assuming that the capital structure remains unchanged. The take-up of credit necessary for balance sheet growth must therefore be included in the value added from the direct attribution of retained earnings to the shareholders.

306. The financial result is derived on the basis of the asset status of the company as at 30 September 2015 and an integrated projection of the balance sheet and financial budget. Alongside the forecasts for investment and depreciation and amortization, this includes forecasts concerning the further changes to the net current assets and non-current provisions.

307. We adapted the balance sheet and financial budget prepared by Wincor Nixdorf in view of the existing share-based payment programs. Wincor Nixdorf has implemented share-based payment programs with the goal to enabling individual employees and the management to participate in the value increases of the company. Four of these programs were active as at the valuation date: Program 2013 (a total of 651,076 options), Program 2014 (623,361), Program 2015 (695,548) and Program 2016 (714,470). All programs have a four-year vesting period. In the past, these programs have been classified as settlements through equity instruments. Based on a decision at the end of the third quarter 2015/16, instruments have been reclassified as cash settlement. The difference with a cash settlement compared to an equity settlement is

82

PwC

there is no dilution of the number of existing shares, rather the debit effect results from the cash outflow over the course of time. Therefore in the forecast calculations, we have recognized those parts of the share-based payment programs already vested and projected this in accordance with the expected cash outflow. An option valuation based on the Black Scholes model was performed in order to determine the value of the options of the tranches. The material factors influencing the value were taken into account in the valuation. The Black Scholes model is a standard method used in practice for the valuation of options, such as those envisaged by the share-based payment program of Wincor Nixdorf. We also factored in a possible fluctuation of employees in connection with the basic contractually agreed non-transferability of the options, by estimating a fluctuation rate.

308. The financial liabilities of the company amounted to EUR 177.8m as at 30 September 2015. The largest items in this respect were a loan from the European Investment Bank in the amount of EUR 85m and overdraft facilities in the amount of EUR 86.2m and arranged with several banks. In addition, there are net liabilities arising from pension commitments in the amount of EUR 83.3m. Having taken the existing deposit and lending terms into account, the financial result amounts to 0.0-0.6% and for the terminal value period between 0.0% (credit interest rate) and 0.29%-2.03% (borrowing rate).

309. We took account of the operating income tax, taking this from the company plan. This encompassed an average assessment rate of 410% for the German consolidated tax group within the Group. Furthermore, we took account of the operating income tax in the form of corporation tax plus the solidarity surcharge as well as fiscal adjustments to the results. For the foreign-based subsidiaries, we took account of the specific national corporate taxes as well as any existing loss carryforwards. Because the foreign loss carryforwards were not completely exhausted during the detailed planning period, we have recognized the remaining loss carryforwards on an annuity basis in the period of perpetual annuity. Overall, an average effective tax rate of 28.5% is thereby produced for the detailed planning phase (incl. prolongation year) and for the terminal value phase.

310. The earnings attributed to minority interests encompasses companies’ forecast of the companies Bankberatung AG, Wedemark, Portavis GmbH, Hamburg, CI Tech Sensors AG, Burgdorf/Schweiz, Projective NV as well as AEVI that are attributable to non-Wincor Nixdorf shareholders.

311. For the detailed planning period, we have applied a distribution ratio of 50% in accordance with the distribution policy as communicated. For the period of perpetual annuity, we assumed a standard market distribution ratio of 50% and notionally allocated the retained earnings to the shareholders. During the detailed planning period, the sums of retained earnings were primarily applied to the refinancing of net current assets, as well as the financing of investments and the repayment of loans. Based on these premises, the sums of retained earnings amounts are not notionally attributed to the shareholders, but, as financial resources available to the company, are instead added to the calculation of the financial requirement, and so implicitly become part of the calculation of the net interest.

312. The differing accrual and realization times result in different effective tax burdens. The effective tax charge for interest and dividends generally corresponds to the nominal tax burden. In contrast, the effective tax burden on retained earnings resulting in value increases depends on the time of the realization of the value increase. It decreases the longer the shareholder retains a security. Shareholders therefore attempt to use long retention periods to keep the effective tax burden as low as possible. Assuming a longer retention period with its associated discounting effects, this entails a significantly reduced effective tax rate for capital gains compared to the nominal tax burden of 25.0% plus solidarity surcharge, which we have typically applied at half of the nominal tax rate plus the solidarity surcharge.

83

PwC

III. Determination of the discount rate

313. In order to value a company, the projected future financial surpluses need to be discounted to the valuation date using an appropriate interest rate. This discount rate is geared towards the (expected) returns on an appropriate alternative capital investment compared with the subject of the valuation. It consequently indicates the minimum return on capital that must be generated from the subject of the valuation in order to ensure that shareholders are not worse off than they would have been, if they had invested in the next best alternative investment. When determining objectified business values, the alternative investment and the corresponding return are generally characterised by an investment in a bundle of publicly listed corporate shares (stock portfolio), adjusted to incorporate the risk structure of the business subject to valuation. In the case of direct standardisation of personal income taxes, the future earnings to be discounted are reduced for personal income taxes. In addition, the discount rate is also to be applied after the deduction of personal income taxes.

314. When assessing returns on investments in shares, a differentiation is generally made between the risk free rate and the risk premium. In addition, for technical valuation reasons the prospects for growth in financial surpluses after the end of the forecast period must be assessed and deducted from the discount rate as a terminal growth rate.

1. Risk free rate

315. In accordance with the recommendations of the IDW, we based the determination of the appropriate risk free rate on a yield curve, which we determined by taking into account the current interest rates as well as interest structure data published by the German Federal Bank (Deutsche Bundesbank). The applied structural interest rate data are estimated values calculated on the basis of observed current yields on (quasi) risk free coupon bonds, i.e. federal bonds, federal notes and federal treasury obligations. The calculated yield curve establishes the connection between interest rates and terms to maturity as would be applicable for zero-coupon bonds with no credit default risk. The application of zero-bond factors that are appropriate to the term to maturity and that are derived from the yield curve ensures the necessary adherence to matching maturities between the alternative investment and the financial surpluses to be valued.

316. Based on the calculated yield curve, we have calculated a uniform rounded risk free rate of 0.7% on the basis of the three-month average (April to July 2016) before personal income tax. In so doing, we took account of the FAUB’s – the Expert Committee for Company Valuation and Business Economics (Fach-ausschuss für Unternehmensbewertung und Betriebswirtschaft) – recommendation published on 13 July 2016, in line with which, given the sustained low interest rate environment with risk free rates of less than 1.0%, a rounding to just 1/10 percentage points is to be performed.

317. This risk free rate was determined in due consideration of our insights gained until the completion of our expert opinion, as well as the factors expected up to the day the general shareholders meeting is convened to adopt the resolution. In line with the assumptions applied in the derivation of the risk premium, the risk free rate has to be reduced by the personal tax rate of 25% plus solidarity surcharge (totaling 26.4%). Following the deduction of personal taxes, the rounded risk free rate is therefore 0.52%.

84

PwC

318. We refer to chapters 7.2 and 7.3 regarding the possible valuation-related effects of changes in interest conditions occurring between the conclusion of our valuation work and the date the extraordinary shareholders’ meeting is convened to adopt the resolution.

2. Risk premium

319. Entrepreneurial activities always involve risks and opportunities. Therefore, the future earnings cannot be forecast with certainty. In order to consider these entrepreneurial uncertainties (entrepreneurial risks), market participants require a risk premium in addition to the risk free rate.

320. As investors face specific risk when investing in companies (investment risk), they require a premium over and above the (quasi) risk free capital market interest rate (risk premium). In order to achieve risk equivalence with the discounted payment stream, the calculation of the risk premium must be oriented towards the risk structure of the company being valued.

321. To measure the risk premium when valuing a company, asset pricing models can be used in line with the definition of alternative investments, whereby these models enable each company’s individual risk premium to be estimated based on the market risk premium pertaining to a market portfolio. In line with official professional pronouncements, we have applied the capital asset pricing model (tax CAPM) to measure the risk premium. Based on the tax CAPM, we arrive at the company-specific risk premium by multiplying the company’s beta factor by the market risk premium. The beta factor is a measure of the entrepreneurial risk in relation to the market risk. A beta factor greater than one means that the market value of the equity of the company in question responds more strongly than average to fluctuations in the overall market, whereas a beta factor of less than one indicates a sub-proportionate response.

322. The expected market risk premium can be estimated from the historical difference between the returns on risk-bearing securities, based, for example, on an equities index, and the returns on (quasi) risk-free capital market investments. Empirical examinations of the German capital market show that – depending on the underlying study period – investments in stocks generated returns in the past that were an average of four to seven per cent higher than investments in (quasi) risk-free capital market investments.

323. The FAUB regularly sits to discuss the influencing factors for the measurement of the discount rate, and it updates its recommendations in accordance with any sustained changes. The FAUB’s analyses performed from 2011 onwards indicates that the market risk premium after personal income tax of 4.5% to January 2012 does no longer take market conditions into account. For, in forecasting the market risk premium, it is necessary to identify any changes to the influencing parameters – especially any change to the risk tolerance – prompted by the crisis in the financial market, and to take these into account accordingly. Due to current market observations and implicitly determined market risk premia based on forecasts by financial analysts and rating agencies, the FAUB came to the conclusion that, in calculating the market risk premium from January 2012, it is appropriate to be guided by a ceiling of 5.0% and, from September 2012, by a market risk premium range after personal income tax of 5.0% to 6.0% (or 5.5% to 7.0% before personal income tax).

324. On this basis and taking into account the currently applicable tax legislation and based on the defined tax model, we find a market risk premium after personal taxes of 5.5% as appropriate for the valuation of the company, and we used this as the basis for our calculation of the cost of equity.

85

PwC

325. Because the shares of Wincor Nixdorf are listed on the stock market (Ticker: XTRA:WIN), it is possible to empirically estimate the beta factor using suitable econometric methods. We estimated and analyzed the company’s beta factor on the basis of the data from the financial information service provider, S&P Capital IQ, New York, USA (“Capital IQ” or “CIQ”).

326. The original (i.e. own) beta factors we estimated for Wincor Nixdorf fulfill the standard statistical quality criteria for purposes of beta factor estimations (adequate number of data points, passing of t-test, sufficiently high R squared). We also find the liquidity of the Wincor Nixdorf shares to be adequate – measured on trading volume and turnover and the bid-ask spread – for the purposes of estimating the original beta factor of Wincor Nixdorf.

327. However, the share price performance of the Wincor Nixdorf shares contains indications that the price and liquidity of the shares have been significantly influenced, especially by the announcement of the discussions concerning the business combination with Diebold Inc. (17 October 2015) and the achievement of the acceptance threshold of the takeover bid (24 March 2016).

Source: CIQ, PwC analysis

328. As can be seen from the figure above, upon the announcement of the discussions about the business combination with Diebold Inc. on 17 October 2015, the Volume Weighted Average Price (“VWAP”) of the Wincor Nixdorf shares leapt upwards from EUR 38.88 to EUR 45.67 on the next trading day, 19 October 2015, following the announcement. In all, the share price rose to a high of EUR 52.35 (24 March 2016) following the announcement of the takeover bid and the Joint statement of the Board of Directors and Supervisory Board of Wincor Nixdorf AG in this regard in February 2016 as well as the expiry of the acceptance period on 22 March 2016. No noteworthy price jumps have taken place since that time, the price has stayed mainly at a level near the implied consideration, before, more recently, slight upward tendencies could be observed.

86

PwC

329. In view of this, it cannot be ruled out that the share price of Wincor Nixdorf is being distorted by the take-over or the speculation about the takeover (especially concerning the achievement of the acceptance threshold), and is not solely determined by the original (business) risk of the company. This is also sug-gested by the significant change in the beta factor during the specified period (before and after the announcement of the takeover talks). Nor can it be ruled out that the share price will (again) decouple from the overall market performance by the valuation date of 26 September 2016.

330. Taking into account the arguments presented, we cannot rule out a speculative distortion of the historical beta factor for the period from October 2015, and we instead derived a beta factor on a peer group basis, as described below. However, we supplemented this by considering the original beta factor of Wincor Nixdorf of 0.95 (local index) and 1.26 (global index), respectively, for plausibility assessment purposes.

331. We used CIQ’s capital market data in order to derive the beta factors of the comparable peer group com-panies. With regard to the selection of the peer group companies, naturally, a comparison with companies in the same industry may be used as a starting point, which market the same products and operate within the same market structures, such as being subject to similar competition. The ATM and POS segments are particularly relevant in this case. In individual cases, companies in other segments can also be used as potential peers, insofar as the main value-relevant features correspond, such as the market structure and product characteristics. It is neither possible nor necessary for the companies to match exactly. However, the future earnings of the selected peer group companies and of the company to be valued should be subject to a largely corresponding business risk.

332. To determine the group of peer companies, we firstly identified companies with a business model com-parable to that of Wincor Nixdorf. Apart from this screening, we also performed further research and analyses of publicly available information and information provided by the company to be valued, in order to identify other potential peer companies.

333. Alongside an appraisal of qualitative criteria, especially the “business fit” and industry affiliation (industry criterion) corresponding with Wincor Nixdorf, we condensed the long list of benchmark companies by applying quantitative criteria (including active trading, adequate level of free float, minimum market capitalization, net sales and margins). We excluded those companies that only covered a small part of the business operations of Wincor Nixdorf, or – on the other hand – widely diversified technology companies.

334. Based on the screening as described above, together with the supplementary analysis, we identified the following listed companies as possible peer companies from among all the companies examined, and used these in the identification of the peer group beta factor:

• NCR Corporation, Duluth/USA (“NCR”)

NCR Corporation is a technology company that operates globally through four segments: Financial Services, Retail Solutions, Hospitality, and Emerging Industries. The company primarily serves financial institutions, retailers, restaurants, food service companies and travel industries. NCR offers hardware and software as well as services. The hardware offering includes ATMs (Automated Teller Machines), cash dispensers, point of sales terminals, self-service kiosks and printer supplies. NCR is the world market leader in the hardware segment and has its main sales market in North America. In addition to the hardware, the company offers associated operating software, security solutions and cloud services that are individually adapted to customers. In its services sector, NCR provides services such as the installation, maintenance and reparations as well as system manage-ment and consulting on branch optimization. In 2015, NCR generated net sales of 5,868 mEUR and an EBIT of 203 mEUR. This equals an EBIT margin of 3.5%. NCR Corporation was founded in 1884 and is headquartered in Duluth, Georgia.

87

PwC

• Diebold Inc.

Diebold Inc. operates worldwide through two core business segments: self-service systems for financial services and security solutions. The company offers self-service technologies and services, including automated teller machine (ATM) outsourcing, ATM security, deposit automation, recycling and payment terminals, and software. Diebold Inc. is a leading provider of security systems, both physical and electronical, and assists transactions by offering high-end security solutions for the financial and the retail market as well as others. Installation and service teams support the implementation of these security solutions. The company operates in four geographical segments: North America; Asia Pacific; Europe, Middle East and Africa; and Latin America. In 2015, the net sales of Diebold Inc. amounted to 2,228 mEUR. Diebold Inc. generated an EBIT of 124 mEUR, which equals a margin of 5.6%. The company was founded in 1859 and is headquartered in North Canton, Ohio.

335. Based on our analyses and in its entirety, these two peer group companies exhibit the best possible comparability to Wincor Nixdorf in terms of business model/operations and business risk profile. Thus, they form the “Core Peer Group” for purposes of deriving the beta factor (in addition, and as plausibility check, we compiled an “Extended Peer Group”, see para 345 et seqq.).

336. Due to the dependency of company performance on general market developments, in our opinion the longest possible analysis period, which also reflects varying economic phases, is appropriate for the estimation of the beta factor. Correspondingly, for our analysis regarding the expected average entrepre-neurial risk across varying economic phases, we estimated beta factors based on monthly returns over a five-year period.

337. Looking at the applicable benchmark index, in practice there are two standard methods, these being the estimation against a global benchmark index or against a broad local benchmark index. We have therefore drawn upon both beta benchmark indexes for the identification of the beta factors of the peer companies. Nevertheless, on the one hand, a worldwide demarcation of the investment universe – especially in the light of increasing cross-border integrated capital and product markets and the absence of capital controls – is appropriate for the theoretical ideal of having the broadest possible market portfolio, and this also corresponds better to the investment opportunity set actually available to an investor. By performing the regression, on the other hand, against a local benchmark index in the currency the peer company’s shares trade in, distortions arising from currency translation can be largely excluded. In addition, the empirically observed so called home bias phenomenon, i.e. the preference to hold shares listed in the home country, can be accounted for.

88

PwC

338. The derivation of an average beta factor of the benchmark companies of the Core Peer Group based on monthly returns across a five-year period from July 2011 to July 2016 is shown below:

Beta factors of the “Core Peer Group”

Regression performed	27.07.2016
Index for regression	local index
Time period of regression	5 years (monthly)
Company	Index	Beta raw		D/E			Beta unlev.
NCR Corporation	S&P 500 Index		1.60		73	%		1.10
Diebold, Inc.	S&P 500 Index		1.57		18	%		1.39
Average			1.59		45	%		1.24
Regression performed	27.07.2016
Index for regression	global index
Time period of regression	5 years (monthly)
Company	Index	Beta raw		D/E			Beta unlev.
NCR Corporation	MSCI World Index		1.54		73	%		1.06
Diebold, Inc.	MSCI World Index		1.35		18	%		1.20
Average			1.45		45	%		1.13

Source: PwC analysis, Capital IQ

339. Based on the two identified peer group companies – with a regression of monthly returns against local benchmark indices and a global benchmark index across a five-year period – the resulting average “raw beta factor” (beta factors of indebted companies) is 1.59 (local index) and 1.45 (global index) respectively.

340. Irrespective of the benchmark index, both peer group companies have adequately high share liquidity measured on the basis of the bid-ask spread as well as all data points. Statistically significant beta factors can also be estimated for both peer companies.

341. Based on the beta factors of the peer companies and on the company-specific capital structure across the analysis period, we determined the “unlevered beta factors” (beta factor of a non-indebted or “unlevered” company).

342. This method results in an unlevered beta factor (beta unlev.) of 1.24 (local index) and 1.13 (global index) respectively for the peer group, yielding an average of 1.18.

343. Both unlevered beta factors lie in the middle of the range of the original unlevered beta factors of 0.95 (local index) and 1.26 (global index) similarly derived for Wincor Nixdorf simply for plausibility assess-ment purposes.

344. In summary, on this basis we regard the application of an unlevered beta factor at the lower end of the range derived for the Core Peer Group of 1.1 as appropriate for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf.

345. In addition to the Core Peer Group – and as a plausibility check – we derived an Extended Peer Group that is described below. Besides the two peer companies of the Core Peer Group this peer group includes four additional peer companies that exhibit a good fit to Wincor Nixdorf as far as individual business segments are concerned and correspondingly take into account the strategic focus and development opportunities of Wincor Nixdorf.

89

PwC

• Ingenico Group, Paris/France („Ingenico“)

Ingenico Group provides payment solutions through in-store, online, and mobile channels worldwide. It operates a range of smart terminals combining technologies with security requirements. In addition, it provides transaction capture and complex transaction management services to allow merchants to manage and secure their digital payment transactions and processes. Among others, it serves banking, retail, transportation and hospitality. In 2015, the net sales of Ingenico Group amounted to EUR 2,197m. Ingenico Group generated EBIT of EUR 389m, which equals a margin of 17.7%. The company was founded in 1980 and is headquartered in Paris, France.

• VeriFone Systems, Inc., San Jose/USA („VeriFone“)

VeriFone Systems Inc. designs, markets, and services electronic payment systems. Its products include electronic cash register and payment devices, PIN pads, POS systems, and wireless payment devices. The company also provides software solutions for card acceptance, mobile payments, security and encryption and POS integration. It serves financial institutions, payment processors, retailers, government organizations, and healthcare companies all over the world. In 2015, VeriFone generated net sales of 1,814 mEUR and EBIT of 106 mEUR. This equals an EBIT margin of 5.8%. VeriFone was founded in 1981 and is headquartered in San Jose, California, United States.

• Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd., Tokyo/Japan (“Oki”)

Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. manufactures and sells products, technologies, software, and solutions for telecommunications systems and information systems in Japan and internationally. The company operates through Info-Telecom Systems, Printers, and EMS (Electronic Manufacturing Service). Its business segments include hardware, software and services for various industries. The hardware offering consists of ATMs, money transfer terminals, check-in terminals, cash machines and printer supplies. Furthermore, Oki offers a wide range of software such as systems for networks, call centers and cloud computing. The services sector includes outsourcing of business processes and support for hardware and software products. In 2015, Oki generated net sales of 4,190 mEUR and EBIT of 251 mEUR. This equals an EBIT margin of 6.0%. Oki was founded in 1881 and is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

• Glory Ltd., Himeji/Japan („Glory“)

Glory Ltd. develops, manufactures, sells, and maintains money handling machines and systems. It operates globally through financial market, retail and transportation market. The company provides products such as cash management systems, vending machines and multi-functional banknote changers. In 2015, the net sales of Glory Ltd. amounted to EUR 1,761m. Glory Ltd. generated EBIT of EUR 149m, which equals a margin of 8.5%. The company was founded in 1918 and is headquartered in Himeji, Japan.

346. Whereas Ingenico and VeriFone serve as peers for the increasingly important business unit AEVI in the cashless payment services segment, Oki and Glory represent rather hardware-focused Asian competitors.

90

PwC

347. For the Extended Peer Group we derived the following beta factors:

Beta factors of the “Extended Peer Group”

Regression performed	27.07.2016
Index for regression	local index
Time period of regression	5 years (monthly)
Company	Index	Beta raw		D/E			Beta unlev.
NCR Corporation	S&P 500 Index		1.60		73	%		1.10
Diebold, Inc.	S&P 500 Index		1.57		18	%		1.39
Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.	Nikkei 225 Index		1.50		81	%		1.00
Ingenico Group	CAC All-Tradable Index		0.82		10	%		0.78
VeriFone Systems, Inc.	S&P 500 Index		1.83		21	%		1.58
Glory Ltd.	Nikkei 225 Index		0.98		-5	%		1.01
Average			1.38		33	%		1.14
Regression performed	27.07.2016
Index for regression	global index
Time period of regression	5 years (monthly)
Company	Index	Beta raw		D/E			Beta unlev.
NCR Corporation	MSCI World Index		1.54		73	%		1.06
Diebold, Inc.	MSCI World Index		1.35		18	%		1.20
Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd.	MSCI World Index		1.19		81	%		0.84
Ingenico Group	MSCI World Index		1.00		10	%		0.95
VeriFone Systems, Inc.	MSCI World Index		1.37		21	%		1.21
Glory Ltd.	MSCI World Index		0.65		-5	%		0.67
Average			1.19		33	%		0.99

Source: PwC analysis, Capital IQ

348. Irrespective of the benchmark index, all additional peer group companies have adequately high share liquidity measured on the basis of the bid-ask spread as well as all data points. Statistically significant beta factors can also be estimated for the additional peer companies (t-test). Using a similar procedure as in case of the Core Peer Group, we determined “unlevered beta factors” (beta factor of a non-indebted or “unlevered” company) based on the beta factors of the peer companies and on the company-specific capital structure across the analysis period.

349. This yields unlevered beta factors of 1.14 (local index) and 0.99 (global index), respectively, and on average of 1.06, for the Extended Peer Group. These beta factors lie within the range of Wincor Nixdorf’s own unlevered beta factors, ranging from 0.95 to 1.26. Thus, and likewise, the beta factor of 1.1 underlying our valuation of Wincor Nixdorf also lies within the range derived based on the Extended Peer Group that merely serves plausibility assessment purposes.

350. However, we stress that the extension of the peer group by including payment services provider as well as hardware focused Asian peers does not better reflect the aggregate business risk profile of Wincor Nixdorf than does the Core Peer Group. Therefore, the relative importance of individual business segments of Wincor Nixdorf is not adequately reflected by an extension of the peer group. For example, AEVI is expected to account only for approx. 5% of revenues by the end of the forecast period in FY 2017/2018. Given this weight an inclusion of the additional peers into the Core Peer Group does not seem suitable yet.

91

PwC

351. We adjusted the unlevered beta factor within the valuation calculation to the expected future capital structure of Wincor Nixdorf, both with respect to the detailed planning period as well as during the terminal value phase (known as “gearing” or “levering”).

3. Terminal growth rate

352. Future growth of the financial surpluses results from the retention of earnings retained earnings and their reinvestment, as well as the organic growth of pricing, quantity and structural effects. This growth potential is mapped for the detailed planning period in the company plan, and is consequently included in the financial surpluses.

353. For the terminal value phase, the growth related to retained earnings is likewise included in the financial surpluses in the form of value added from retained earnings. Growth potential is also taken into account in the valuation of the terminal value phase, by way of a terminal growth rate in the discount rate.

354. Assuming the complete distribution of all the funds by way of dividends and the fictitious attribution of retention, the only growth remains in the form of price increases standard to the industry.

355. Wincor Nixdorf’s hardware business is facing intense competition and pricing pressure already today. In the long run, even stable sales prices will only be realistic as long as the company generates sufficient innovation to compensate price erosion. The software/services business shows more stable pricing, which is in line with overall inflation. Thus, Wincor Nixdorf is operating in business segments which in total exhibit less inflation then the overall economy. In addition, the overall inflation is currently substantially lower than its long term average. The risk-free rate is currently only at 0.7% (rounded). Assuming that in the long term positive real interest rates prevail, the terminal growth rate should not be materially higher than the risk-free rate.

356. Due to foreign operations, currency rates are relevant. Wincor Nixdorf principally assumes fixed currency rates in its business plan. This implicitly assumes that the depreciation of foreign currencies can be compensated through inflationary growth in earnings. This assumption is then also applicable for the terminal value phase.

357. Taking account of the influencing factors as described above as well as a substantial portion of hardware business with sustainably increasing pricing pressure and competition and little ability to pass inflation onto customers, we consider annual growth in the financial surpluses, and consequently a terminal growth rate of 0.75% to be reasonable.

92

PwC

4. Derivation of the discount rate

358. The following table contains a summary of the discount rates relevant for the period under review. The changes to the risk premium here are the result of changes to the financing structure during the detailed planning period and in the terminal value phase:

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Discount Rate

	2015/2016 FC			2016/2017 Planned			2017/2018 Planned			2018/2019 techn. Year			2019/2020 TV
Risk free rate before personal taxes		0.70	%		0.70	%		0.70	%		0.70	%		0.70	%
Withholding tax (26.38%)		-0.18	%		-0.18	%		-0.18	%		-0.18	%		-0.18	%
Risk free rate after personal taxes		0.52	%		0.52	%		0.52	%		0.52	%		0.52	%
Market risk premium after personal taxes		5.50	%		5.50	%		5.50	%		5.50	%		5.50	%
Beta factor (period-specific relevering)		1.29			1.28			1.31			1.29			1.23
Risk premium after personal taxes		7.08	%		7.05	%		7.18	%		7.07	%		6.79	%
Cost of equity after personal taxes		7.60	%		7.56	%		7.70	%		7.59	%		7.30	%
Growth discount (terminal value)		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.0	%		0.00	%		-0.75	%
Discount rate after personal taxes		7.60	%		7.56	%		7.70	%		7.59	%		6.55	%

Source: Pw C analysis

93

PwC

5. Earnings value of the business operations

359. Unless a company is established for a limited period, or its limited duration must be assumed given the particular circumstances, for the purposes of determining the business value it is assumed that the company will exist for an unlimited period. This remains the case if the buyer in question does not want to retain its shareholding indefinitely, because the theoretical price it would achieve with the sale is identical to the present value of the expected net distributions.

360. The earnings value of the business operations of Wincor Nixdorf is calculated as the total present value of the capitalized net distributions (dividends) and the future contributions to value from the retention of earnings. In order to determine the present value of the net distributions, it is necessary to individually discount the forecast results for the financial years 2015/2016 to 2018/19 (including, from a technical perspective, the prolongation year in order to take account of the full amount produced by income synergies). In each case, the discounting is performed on the day the general shareholders meeting is convened to adopt the resolution, 26 September 2016. With respect to the average net distributions that can be withdrawn from financial year 2019/20 onward, the present value is calculated using the perpetual annuity formula. The present value of the perpetual annuity must be discounted to the valuation date.

361. Based on the capitalized results of Wincor Nixdorf and the application of the discount rates described above – in each case to 31 January of the following year, assuming a distribution of profit or loss – the earnings value, in the form of the present value of the expected net distributions, looks as follows:

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Value contribution of net payouts

in mEUR	2015/2016 FC			2016/2017 Planned			2017/2018 Planned			2018/2019 techn. Year			2019/2020 TV
Distributed dividends after personal income taxes		36			43			54			53			53
Discount rate		7.6	%		7.6	%		7.7	%		7.6	%		6.6	%
Present value factor		0.91			0.84			0.78			0.73			11.10
Discounted dividend		33			36			42			38			590
Earnings value from dividend distribution at the beginning of the period		740
Earnings value from dividend distribution as at valuation date		795

Source: PwC analysis

362. Over the long term, the retained earnings during the period of perpetual annuity result in accruals to the company owners, which are subject to capital gains tax. This can take place by way of share buybacks and/or the realization of price gains, for example. Regarding the present value of these earnings, we accounted for these as value added resulting from retained earnings.

363. Based on the discountable retained earnings of Wincor Nixdorf, and by applying the discount rates described above – with continuously accruing value added across the fiscal year, i.e. an average accrual to 31 March of the fiscal year in question – the value added from retained earnings is described in the following table.

94

PwC

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Value contribution of retained earnings

in mEUR	2015/2016 FC			2016/2017 Planned			2017/2018 Planned			2018/2019 techn. Year			2019/2020 TV
Retained earnings after personal income taxes		—			—			—			—			63
Discount rate		7.6	%		7.6	%		7.7	%		7.6	%		6.6	%
Present value factor		0.96			0.90			0.83			0.77			11.80
Discounted retained earnings		—			—			—			—			739
Earnings value from retained earnings at the beginning of the period		739
Earnings value from retained earnings as at valuation date		795

Source: PwC analysis

364. The earnings value of Wincor Nixdorf as the sum of the present values of dividends and the value added from the retention of earnings comes to the total amount of EUR 1,591m as of the valuation date, 26 September 2016. In absence of assets to be valued separately, the so called special value, the earnings value equals the business value and serves as basis for deriving the value per share.

Wincor Nixdorf AG - Business value / value per share

in mEUR
Value contribution of net payouts	795
Value contribution of retained earnings	795
Earnings value as at valuation date	1,591
Special value	—
Business value	1,591
Number of shares	29,816,211
Value per share (in EUR)	53.34

Source: PwC analysis

IV. Business value and value per share

365. The business value of Wincor Nixdorf therefore results from the earnings value as at 26 September 2016 and amounts to EUR 1,591m. With 29,816,211 shares, this corresponds to a value per share of EUR 53.34.

95

PwC

05 Liquidation value

366. Should it prove more beneficial to dispose separately of all operating and non-operating assets rather than continue the company as a going concern, the valuation should be based on the liquidation value insofar as this is not prevented by constraints in law or in fact. To verify whether the liquidation value is greater than the business value, the liquidation value for Wincor Nixdorf was determined on the basis of the most recent information concerning the net assets of the Company taken from the consolidated financial statements as at 30 September 2015 and Amendment No. 4 to FORM S-4 REGISTRATION STATEMENT (“Amendment S-4”) as at 5 February 2016 and compared with the business value determined by us using a discounted earnings valuation. (Due to relevant US-American trading regulations, the Diebold Inc. has to submit a registration document of form S-4. The tender offer may only be carried out after the US Securities and Exchange Commission approves the effectiveness of the registration document taking into account all required additions). The calculations necessary for the derivation of the liquidation value can be described as follows:

367. The value of the assets is determined by the selling market for the assets to be liquidated. In performing our calculations, we assumed that property, plant and equipment as well as financial assets can be disposed of at book value after taking into account the discounts that can be typically expected in the event of liquidation. The fair values for inventories were recalculated as at 30 September 2015 in Amendment S-4. We have taken these values into account in determining liquidation values for the inventories. The intangible assets mainly comprise goodwill, which would no longer have any value in the event of liquidation. After taking into account the lower receipts that can be typically expected for receivables in the event of liquidation, the value of the remaining assets in the event of liquidation was largely based on book values as at 30 September 2015 for the purposes of simplification.

368. In addition, intangible assets such as customer relationships, technologies and brand were identified and measured at fair value in Amendment S-4. Although they were not recognized in the balance sheet as at 30 September 2015, they could be used as assumptions in the context of determining the liquidation value. In calculating the liquidation value, we have therefore taken into account the fair values for the brand name Wincor Nixdorf, the technologies and the customer relationships after factoring in the discounts that can be typically expected in the event of liquidation.

369. The Company’s liabilities are to be deducted from the assets determined on this basis. For purposes of simplification, they too were applied at their balance sheet value as at 30 September 2015. Other deductions include the costs entailed by liquidation, such as winding up costs and social compensation plan outlays. The liquidation value derived by us in this manner was significantly less than the earnings value, meaning that it is of no relevance for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf as a business and for determining a value per share.

96

PwC

06 Plausibility check of the business value on the basis of multiples

I. General procedure

370. Valuation practice commonly applies simplified procedures based on multiples, which can be used to verify the plausibility of the results of the business valuation, based on the discounted earnings method or DCF method. Here, the business value is estimated on the basis of a multiple of a success indicator for the subject of the valuation.

371. Suitable multiples can be derived from capital market data of listed benchmark companies (the so-called peer group companies) or from comparable transactions and can be transferred to the company to be valued. It should basically be pointed out that, as a rule, no company is fully comparable with another. The result of the multiples valuation can therefore generally only present a range of possible values within which the result of the valuation should be found. With multiples derived on the basis of transaction prices, it should be borne in mind that purchase prices actually paid are, to a large extent, determined by the subjective interests of the transaction partners. For example, they take into account synergy effects and subjective expectations. To this extent, this method is regularly found to be less useful, compared to multiples derived from share prices for verifying an objectified business value. Therefore, in this case we have limited our observations to the multiples derived from capital market data. It was indeed possible to identify individual transactions in the market segments relevant to Wincor Nixdorf. However, the limited comparability with the transaction in question here, and the absence of an adequate data basis for deriving a multiple, make it impossible to identify any meaningful multiple that is based on transaction prices.

372. Within the framework of a comparative market valuation, multiples can be applied on the basis of different performance indicators:

• PER (Price-earnings ratio): Equity value multiple, which applies the earnings power of the company after all expenses (particularly after debt servicing and after taxes) as reference for the value of the equity. The use of this multiple assumes a comparable debt-equity ratio.

• EV/EBIT (enterprise/entity value to earnings before interest and taxes): Entity multiple, to some extent neutralizes different capital structures. The total business value includes the market value of debt, and to this extent must be distinguished from the calculable business value (known as the market value of equity).

97

PwC

• EV/EBITDA (enterprise/entity value to earnings before interest and taxes): Entity multiple, to some extent neutralizes different capital structures, and requires comparable outgoings for depreciable non-current assets.

• EV/revenues (enterprise/entity value to revenues): entity multiple, neutralizes different capital structures and assumes an approximately comparable profit on turnover.

II. Valuation using multiples based on capital market data

1. Derivation of multiples

373. Whereas under the discounted earnings method the future expected payment streams are explicitly included in the business value, the multiples are generally based on a forecast of revenues or earnings for a base year in the near future. Longer-term earnings expectations, the characteristic earnings development and risk are reflected in the multiple. Under certain premises, the methods for the determination of net present value-based equity values and those based on multiples can be transferred to one another.

374. Critical factors for any comparative market valuation are the forecast success factors and the selection of peer companies in order to generate multiples.

375. In this case – including for reasons of consistency – the derivation of multiples is based on the same extended peer group that was used to determine the beta factor for plausibility checks.

376. The meaningfulness of the PER is influenced by the gearing ratio and by various tax-related aspects. This issue can, in the main, be avoided by applying entity multiples. We have therefore decided not to apply the PER multiple. There are some differences among the peer companies regarding the earnings margins achieved in the past and achievable in the future. As the EV/earnings multiple ignores the cost structure of the company being valued, the meaningfulness of this multiple is fundamentally limited, and we did not apply it for the purpose of checking the plausibility of the determined discounted earnings value.

377. Consequently, we based our capital market-based valuation of Wincor Nixdorf on the multiples of the total enterprise value of the peer companies and their expected EBIT and EBITDA. At this point, the total enterprise value was determined on the basis of the stock market capitalization plus interest-bearing borrowings, net pension obligations and minority interests of the peer companies and less the existing liquidity.

378. In establishing a basis for deriving the multiples, we used average EBITDA and EBIT estimates (consensus estimates) for the peer group for 2017 as published by the financial information service provider, Capital IQ. Compared to 2016, 2017 is far enough into the future to be relevant for market participants for their valuation. Furthermore, compared to 2018, it is close enough to minimize deviations that can derive from a limited amount of analyst estimates or from a time horizon that is too far away for a detailed estimate.

98

PwC

379. On this basis, the EBITDA and EBIT multiples for the benchmark companies are as follows:

Enterprise Values and consensus forecasts for peer group

Enterprise

EBITDA

EBIT

EBITDA

EBIT

Peer group

Currency

Value

2017

2017

multiple

multiple

NCR Corporation

USD

8,897

1,097

871

8.1x

10.2x

Diebold, Incorporated

USD

2,201

297

213

7.4x

10.3x

Oki Electric Industry Co., Ltd. *

JPY

208,204

35,800

24,800

5.8x

8.4x

Ingenico Group

EUR

6,242

570

490

11.0x

12.7x

VeriFone Systems, Inc.

USD

2,951

381

300

7.7x

9.8x

Glory Ltd.*

JPY

200,511

36,550

23,000

5.5x

8.7x

1st Quartile

6.2x

9.0x

Median

7.6x

10.0x

3rd Quartile

8.0x

10.3x

* The balance sheet dates of the Japanese companies is 31 March. Estimates for their financial years have therefore been allocated to the previous year.

Source: Pw C analysis, Capital IQ

2. Multiples valuation

380. Within the scope of our multiples valuation, we applied the EBITDA and EBIT multiples of the peer group to projected 2016/17 EBITDA and EBIT figures including synergies for Wincor Nixdorf. We used the company’s financial position as of 30 June 2016 to reconcile enterprise value to equity value (business value). This financial position can be found in Wincor Nixdorf’s third quarter 2015/16 financial report, the most current information in this regard:

Wincor Nixdorf

Net debt as of 30 June 2016

in mEUR	Jun’16
Cash and cash equivalents		(87	)
Financial debt		136
Provisions for pensions		115
Net debt		165

Source: Wincor Nixdorf, third quarter 2015/16 financial report

99

PwC

381. Based on peer group multiples and the above mentioned financial information, our multiples valuation yields the following value ranges:

Valuation of Wincor Nixdorf AG based on EBITDA multiples

in mEUR	1st Quartile		Median		3rd Quartile
EBITDA multiple		6.2x		7.6x		8.0x
EBITDA 2017		253		253		253
Enterprise value		1,572		1,918		2,028
Net debt at valuation date		165		165		165
Minorities		19		19		19
Equity value		1,389		1,734		1,845

Source: Wincor Nixdorf, Capital IQ, PwC analysis

Valuation of Wincor Nixdorf AG based on EBIT multiples

in mEUR	1st Quartile		Median		3rd Quartile
EBIT multiple		9.0x		10.0x		10.3x
EBIT 2017		182		182		182
Enterprise value		1,636		1,823		1,873
Net debt at valuation date		165		165		165
Minorities		19		19		19
Equity value		1,452		1,639		1,689

Source: Wincor Nixdorf, Capital IQ, PwC analysis

382. Based on the 2017 EBITDA and EBIT multiples for the peer group, the enterprise value of Wincor Nixdorf amounts to a range from EUR 1,572m to EUR 2,028m. Deducting net debt of EUR 165m and minority interests of EUR 19m, the business value (equity value) lies within a range of EUR 1,389m and EUR 1,845m. Thus, the business value determined by our discounted earnings valuation of 1,591m lies inside the range of the multiples valuation.

100

PwC

07 Determination of an adequate cash compensation in accordance with § 305 of the German Stock Corporation Act (Aktiengesetz, AktG) and adequate recurring compensation in accordance with § 304 AktG

1. Share price

383. The Wincor-Nixdorf-shares (WKN A0CAYB / ISIN DE000A0CAYB2) are listed on the Frankfurt stock exchange, more specifically in the subsection-regulated market with prime standard and can be traded on all German stock exchanges. The Wincor-Nixdorf-share is currently included in the indices SDAX, MSCI World Index (World Small Cap) and Kempen/SNS Smaller Europe SRI Index (Socially Responsible Investment).

384. On 8 April 2016 Diebold Inc. and Diebold jointly announced that aside from outstanding antitrust releases, all criteria for a takeover bid had been satisfied and that a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement is pursued.

385. The following illustration shows the market price development of Wincor Nixdorf based on the following: the days the share has been traded, the three-month volume weighted average share price and the trading volume over a 5 year interval (2011 – 7 April 2016, the day prior to the announcement of the measure).

101

PwC

Source: Bloomberg, PwC analysis

386. Alternatively, the following diagram shows the share price trend of Wincor Nixdorf based on all trading days, the three-month average price as well as the trading volume of the days that represented a share price jumps of 5% or more, for the three-month period from 8 January to 7 April (the day prior to the announcement of the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement).

Source: Bloomberg, PwC analysis

102

PwC

387. The three month average share price for the time period 8 January 2016 to 7 April 2016, the last day prior to the announcement regarding the intended completion of the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement, has been requested by the BaFin (German federal financial supervisory agency). According to the letter from BaFin dated 23 June 2016 the share price was found to be 46.79 EUR per share. Two share price jumps in excess of 5% have been recorded.

388. With regard to the decision of the Federal Constitutional Court (BVerfG) and the Federal Court of Justice (“BGH”) on joint stock companies, the share price has to be considered as lower limit when setting an exit cash compensation for companies if the share price reflects the market value of the shares (Decision of the Federal Constitutional Court 27 April 1999 - 1 BvR 1613/94, BVerfGE 100, 289 ff.; Decision of the BGH 12 March 2001 - II ZB 15/00, BGHZ 147, 108 ff.).

389. Identifying the relevant period under consideration, the Federal Constitutional Court has decided on 19 July 2010 - II ZB 18/09 (e.g. printed in NZG 2010, 939) and similarly on 28 June 2011 – II ZB 2/10 – deviating from their decision from 12 March 12 2001 – II ZB 15/00, that the exit cash compensation lower bound should be based on the volume weighted average share price for the three months leading up to the announcement of the companies’ structural change. The BGH is basing this conclusion on the normative judgement of § 5(1) WpÜG-AngVO, whereby the minimum offer price during a takeover bid is deduced, utilizing the weighted average share price for the three months prior to the bid or prior to reaching a certain control threshold. Similarly, according to BGH, the share price should be used to calculate the market price a share, excluding the effect of an upcoming structural change. Following the announcement of the measure, the measure is included in the share price, meaning that the share price no longer reflects the market value without the impact of the measure. Moreover, as emphasized by the BGH, analyzing the average share price for the three months prior to the shareholder meeting is technically infeasible, as the cash compensation has to be announced during the meeting. Yet, due to the fixed convocation period (§ 123(1) AktG), it is not possible that the share price just before the shareholder meeting is fixed as of that date.

390. If trading for the respective share essentially stops for a prolonged time period and outstanding shareholders are unable to realize their shares or the share price has been manipulated, then by jurisdiction of the supreme court, the share price may not reflect the market value of a share. The federal court of justice has upheld its decision dated 27 April 1999 that narrowness already exists when 95% of shares are non-tradeable. The free float of Wincor Nixdorf during the relevant three-month interval lies between 27.8% and 29.8%, meaning a sufficient amount of shares is freely tradeable.

391. Further classification on this topic is only given by § 5 WpÜG-AngVO, which the BGH points out during its jurisdiction from 19 July 2010 - II ZB 18/09. Pursuant to § 5(4) WpÜG-AngVO the share price is not essential when determining the reward to an acquisition if during the aforementioned three-month period, less than a third of all trading days provide a share price for the corresponding share and if there are consecutive stock price jumps of over 5%.

392. During the three-month reference period from 8 January 2016 to 7 April 2016, revenue has been recorded on 63 of 63 possible trading days, a 100% quota. This indicates liquidity of the share pursuant to both the law and the WpÜG-AngVO. Moreover, as previously presented, the three-month period only had two share price jumps in excess of 5%, which were also not consecutive. Hence, no narrowness of the market is detectable and the average share price gives a valid indication for the market value of the share, pursuant to the law.

103

PwC

393. The three month average share price for the time period 8 January 2016 to 7 April 2016, the last day prior to the announcement regarding the intended completion of the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement, amounts to 46.79 EUR (Source: BaFin).

394. Respecting all aforementioned variables and jurisdiction, we deem the average share price of Wincor Nixdorf to be relevant to determine an adequate cash compensation.

2. Determination of an adequate cash compensation

395. In order to calculate the amount for an adequate cash compensation, the business value of Wincor Nixdorf of EUR 1,591m as at 26 September 2016 was applied to the total number of outstanding company shares, amounting to 29,816,211 units. This produces a value per share of EUR 53.34.

396. During the period from 8 January 2016 to 7 April 2016 the weighted average listed price of Wincor Nixdorf shares amounted to EUR 46.79. Consequently, the average price lies below the value per share calculated on the basis of the discounted earnings method. Therefore, the adequate cash compensation amount per Wincor Nixdorf share is EUR 53.34.

397. The cash compensation calculated according to the discounted earnings valuation is based on the information provided to us, up to the end of our valuation activities. If events occur between the completion of our valuation work and the day of the general shareholders meeting on 26 September 2016, which impact the amount of the cash compensation, the values must be adjusted correspondingly.

398. Due to the current dynamic changes in the general economic conditions and their associated impact on the interest conditions, by the end of our valuation activities we are unable to rule out the possibility that the use of a different risk-free rate will be necessary according to the applicable valuation principles in the period between the end of the valuation work and the date of the ordinary general meeting convened to adopt the resolution, which is the applicable date for the valuation. As a result of these uncertainties, along with the results achieved by the end of our valuation work, we set out a scenario observation below, which, by way of an alternative, takes the impact of risk-free rates before personal tax of 0.4% to 0.9% into account. For the purpose of simplification, it is assumed that all other valuation parameters and procedures remain unchanged. This applies especially for potential reverse effects, which have not been considered here.

104

PwC

399. The following table contains an overview of the business values determined on this basis:

Scenarios - Business value per share

Risk-free rate	Business value per share (in EUR)
0.40%		55.89
0.50%		55.02
0.60%		54.17
0.70%		53.34
0.80%		52.54
0.90%		51.75

Source: PwC

3. Determination of adequate recurring compensation

400. In accordance with § 304(2) AktG, the annual amount to be provided as recurring compensation shall be not less than the amount which could be expected to be distributed as the average dividend for each share in view of the past profitability of the company and its prospective profits, taking into account adequate depreciation and reserves for declines in value but exclusive of other profit reserves (§ 304(2), first sentence AktG).

401. The profitability of a company usually varies over the course of time. It is adequately represented by the earnings value predicted by forecasts. This depicts the payments made between companies and company owners, having taken the effects of interest and taxes into account. In the case of companies with positive annual results, these payments are the expected dividends payable to the shareholders. In the interests of bringing consistency to the annual recurring compensation, the legislator does not base the payment obligation on the varying expected annual profit, but instead favors that amount to be distributed as the average profit share payable on the individual shares. The average amount should consequently include profit fluctuations into the calculations, but should smooth these fluctuations by way of a consistent average amount.

402. The recurring compensation was determined by calculating the interest on the business value calculated in this expert opinion. Our starting point here was not the risk-exposed discount rate, because, during the contractual term, the cash compensation payments are subject to a lower risk than are dividend payments. Because the dividend risk is again revived for minority shareholders following the end of the enterprise agreement, the return on a low-risk federal bond is likewise not a suitable benchmark. For this reason, with regard to the return on the business value for the calculation of the amount of the fixed annual recurring compensation, we took as our basis the average of the risk-adjusted present value discount rate, in keeping with the interest rate upon which the calculation of the earnings value was based, and the risk-free rate. Therefore, based on our valuation, we took the mean between the risk-adjusted present value discount rate after personal income tax of 7.35% and the risk-free rate after personal income tax of 0.52% to calculate the present value equivalent of the compensation.

105

PwC

Derivation of the relevant interest rate
Capitalization interest rate equivalent to net present value (after personal income tax)	7.35	%
Risk free rate equivalent to net present value (before personal income tax)	0.70	%
Relevant income tax on risk free rate	26.38	%
Risk free rate equivalent to net present value (after personal income tax)	0.52	%
Risk premium equivalent to net present value	6.84	%
50% of risk premium equivalent to net present value	3.42	%
Relevant interest rate (before personal income tax)	5.34	%
Income tax on recurring compensation	26.38	%
Relevant interest rate (after personal income tax)	3.93	%

Source: PwC analysis

403. The adequate annual recurring compensation can be seen in the following overview:

Recurring compensation (before corporate tax and solidarity surcharge)	Burdened with corporate tax and solidarity surcharge		Not burdened with corporate tax and solidarity surcharge		Total
Business value at valuation date		937		654		1,591
Number of shares		29,816,211		29,816,211		29,816,211
Business value per share in EUR		31.43		21.92		53.34
Yearly recurring compensation per share in EUR (after personal income tax, corporate tax and solidarity surcharge), annuity 3.93%		1.24		0.86		2.10
Plus personal income tax 26.375%		0.44		0.31		0.75
Yearly net recurring compensation per share in EUR (before personal income tax, after corporate tax and solidarity surcharge)		1.68		1.17		2.85
Plus corporate tax and solidarity surcharge 15.825%		0.32		—		0.32
Yearly net recurring compensation per share in EUR (before personal income tax, corporate tax and solidarity surcharge)		1.99		1.17		3.17

Source: PwC analysis

404. This recurring compensation amount was determined on the basis of the currently applicable rate of corporation tax and the solidarity surcharge. The German Federal Supreme Court, in its judgment of 21 July 2003 (file ref. II ZB 17/01, “Ytong”), held that the profit and loss transfer agreement must ensure that by way of recurring compensation, the minority shareholders must receive the distributable average (fixed) gross profit contribution (before corporation tax) per share, less the (distribution) corporation tax payable by the company at the current applicable tax rate.

405. The deduction of the tax-free earnings means that not all of the future profits of Wincor Nixdorf will be subject to German corporation tax. In the light of this, and in accordance with the ruling of the Federal Supreme Court, the anticipated distributable average gross profit must be split into two components, one of which is subject to corporation tax, the other not. This division was performed on the basis of the alternative method of deriving the business value of Wincor Nixdorf, respectively taking into account and omitting the corporation tax plus the resulting solidarity surcharge, together with the ensuing division of the business value of Wincor Nixdorf into one component subject to corporation tax and solidarity surcharge, and one not.

406. The adequate recurring compensation in accordance with § 304 AktG therefore amounts to EUR 3.17 per share (gross profit contribution per share), less corporation tax plus the solidarity surcharge. The rate of corporation tax, plus solidarity surcharge, applicable at the time of the conclusion of the agreement, is

106

PwC

15.825%; this results in a deduction of EUR 0.32 per share for corporation tax. With the rate of the corporation tax and the solidarity surcharge unchanged at 15.0% and 5.5% respectively, the recurring compensation payment amounts to EUR 2.85 per share (net recurring compensation per share).

407. The recurring compensation calculated according to the discounted earnings valuation is based on the information provided to us up to the end of our valuation activities. The values would have to be adjusted appropriately should events occur between the completion of our valuation activities and the day of the general shareholders meeting on 26 September 2016, where these have a significant effect on the amount of the recurring compensation.

408. As a consequence of this, we have considered a scenario observation, which, as an alternative, takes into account the impact of changes in the risk-free rate before personal tax ranging from 0.40% to 0.90%. For the purpose of simplification, it was assumed that all other valuation parameters and procedures remain unchanged. This applies particularly to possible opposing effects, which could not yet be considered at this point. The following table contains an overview of the net recurring compensation per share, as determined on this basis:

Scenarios - Business value per share

Risk-free rate	Net recurring compensation per share (in EUR)
0.40%		2.80
0.50%		2.82
0.60%		2.83
0.70%		2.85
0.80%		2.87
0.90%		2.88

Source: PwC

107

PwC

08 Summary of findings

409. The Board of Directors of Wincor Nixdorf and the executive management of Diebold have instructed us, PwC, by a letter dated 12 May 2016, to prepare an expert opinion on the objective business value of Wincor Nixdorf, and to provide our opinion on an appropriate cash compensation in accordance with § 305 AktG and on an appropriate recurring compensation in accordance with § 304 AktG on the date on which the resolution was adopted by the general shareholders meeting, namely 26 September 2016. The background to this was the intended conclusion of a control agreement in accordance with § 291(1) AktG.

410. The forecast-oriented discounted earnings method explained in our expert opinion underlies our valuation. Our calculations were based on the forecast calculations of the company for the financial years 2015/2016 through 2017/2018. We calculated the anticipated net distributions after the valuation date from the forecast data presented to us.

411. The net distributions are to be discounted on the valuation date by a discount rate. To determine the discount rate, we applied a risk-free rate before personal tax of 0.7%, a post-tax market risk premium of 5.5% and the period-specific beta factor of 1.1 which changes in line with the capital structure.

412. Taking account of the assumptions described above, period-specific discount rates between 7.56% and 7.70% result for the planning years 2015/16 to 2017/18. For the subsequent technical year 2018/19, necessary to reflect all synergies, it results a discount rate of 7.59%. For the time following the explicit forecast phase, for which we assumed long-term achievable growth of net distributions of 0.75% p.a., the expected net distributions as of fiscal year 2019/20 were discounted at a discount rate of 7.30% (before deduction of terminal growth rate).

413. Based on the assumptions described and taking account of the Principles for the Performance of Business Valuations, we determined the business value of Wincor Nixdorf to be EUR 1,591m as at 26 September 2016. Based on the current number of Wincor Nixdorf AG shares, this equals a business value per share of EUR 53.34.

414. We also analyzed the performance of the stock market price. According to established case law of the highest courts, this represents the lower threshold of the appropriate cash compensation if it reflects the market value of the shares. We consider taking due account of a three-month average price prior to publication of the announcement of structuring measures under corporate law to be proper for determining the amount of the appropriate cash compensation. The three-month average price of Wincor Nixdorf for the period from 8 January 2016 through 7 April 2016 – the last day of trading prior to the announcement of the intended conclusion of a control agreement – amounts to EUR 46.79 and is therefore below the value per share calculated on the basis of the discounted earnings valuation. The appropriate cash compensation in accordance with § 305 AktG is therefore EUR 53.34 per Wincor Nixdorf AG share.

415. Determining the appropriate recurring compensation is based on interest payable on the business value. This pertains to projected future distributions, which are reflected in the calculation of the capitalized earnings value. The mean interest rate comprised of the risk-free rate and the risk-adjusted interest rate before the deduction of personal income tax is used, since, on the one hand, making a recurring

108

PwC

compensation during the term of the Agreement is virtually risk-free, and, on the other hand, a possible termination of the control agreement could impact the future success of the company and entail inherent risks for minority shareholders. A control agreement must provide for adequate recurring compensation to minority shareholders in the form of recurring cash payments corresponding to their share of the equity capital (recurring compensation). This gives a recurring compensation in the form of net compensation in accordance with § 304(1) sentence 1, 304(2) sentence 1 AktG of EUR 2.85 per share and gross compensation – mathematically calculated in accordance with established case law of the German Federal Court of Justice – for a full fiscal year in the amount of EUR 3.17 per share.

416. The reasonable cash compensation and the adequate recurring compensation calculated according to the discounted earnings valuation is based on the information provided to us by the end of the valuation work. If events occur between the completion of our valuation work and the day of the general shareholders meeting which impact the amount of the cash compensation or the recurring compensation, the values have to be adjusted correspondingly.

417. Particular difficulties with the valuation within the definition of § 293a(1) sentence 2 AktG were not encountered.

418. We submit this expert opinion to the best of our knowledge and belief with reference to the Code of Professional Conduct and Ethics laid down in §§ 2 and 43 of the German Auditors’ Ordinance (Wirtschaftsprüferordnung).

Frankfurt am Main, 16 August, 2016

PricewaterhouseCoopers
Aktiengesellschaft
Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft
Andreas Grün	ppa. Stefan Brockmann
(German Certified Public Accountant)	(German Certified Public Accountant)

109

PwC

Annex

110

PwC

Corporate structure Wincor Nixdorf AG

111

PwC

112

PwC

113

EX-99.3

Exhibit 99.3

Düsseldorf

Convenience Translation

Report

on the Audit of the

Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

pursuant to § 293b of the German Stock Corporation Act

between

Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA

Eschborn

and

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft

Paderborn

ADKL AG

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Breite Straße 29-31 - 40213 Düsseldorf - Phone +49 211-47838-111 Fax +49 211-47838-0

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Contents

	Page
A. Engagement and Performance of the Engagement		1
B. Subject, Type and Scope of the Contractual Audit		8
C. Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement		10
I. Content of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement		10
II. Methods for the Calculation of the Business Value and Cash Compensation		17
1. General Remarks		17
2. Value of Future Earnings		19
3. Comparative Valuation		22
4. Liquidation Value and Intrinsic Value		23
5. Share Price		24
III. Procedure for the Audit of the Valuation and the Cash Compensation		25
IV. Audit Findings Concerning the Audit of the Valuation and the Cash Compensation in Particular		29
1. Valuation Object		29
a) Legal and Tax Situation		29
b) Economic Foundations		33
ba) Business Activities		33
bb) Market and Competition		36
bc) Financial, Earnings and Liquidity Position		43
bd) Adjustment of the Earnings Position		45
c) Structure and Definition of the Valuation Object		46
2. Valuation Date		47
3. Valuation Method		48
4. Derivation of Net Cash Flows		49
a) Analysis of Forecast Accuracy		49
b) Structure of the Forecast, Forecasting Process and Audit Procedure		50
c) EBITA Forecast for Wincor Nixdorf		55
ca) Group Overview (Including one-time Effects)		55
cb) Banking Segment		58
cc) Retail Segment		61
cd) Overall Assessment		64
d) Contribution to Earnings of Synergies of Relevance for the Valuation		66
e) EBITA in the Perpetual Annuity		67

-I-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

f) Net Income After Personal Income Taxes	69
fa) Cash Flow Adjustments in the Perpetual Annuity	69
fb) Net Financial Income	70
fc) Corporate Taxes and Minority Share	71
fd) Net Cash Flows After Personal Income Taxes	73
5. Discount Rate	75
a) Risk-free rate	76
b) Risk Premium	79
ba) Preliminary Considerations	79
bb) Market Risk Premium	81
bc) Beta Factor	87
c) Terminal Growth Rate	97
d) Overview of Discount Rate	100
6. Separate Assets	101
7. Valuation and Value Per Share	101
8. Scenarios with Altered Interest Rates	101
9. Sensitivity Analysis	102
10. Plausibility of the Valuation	103
11. Comparison with Liquidation Value	105
12. Comparison with Share Price	105
13. Adequacy of the Cash Compensation	107
V. Adequacy of the Recurring Compensation	108
1. Calculation Method	108
2. Annuity Rate	109
3. Consideration of Corporate Tax and Earnings	110
4. Scenarios with Altered Interest Rates	111
5. Sensitivity Analysis	112
D. Final Declaration	113

-II-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

List of Annexes

Annex 1	Decision of the District Court of Dortmund (Commercial Division VI) of 1 June 2016 appointing ADKL AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Düsseldorf, as the court appointed joint contractual auditor according to §§ 293(1), 1, Sentence 1 of the German Stock Corporation Act in the proceedings regarding the conclusion of a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement concerning Wincor Nixdorf AG, Paderborn and Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, Eschborn (Case No 20 O 21/16 AktE)
Annex 2	Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement between Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, Eschborn and Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn (final draft of 16 August 2016)
Annex 3	General Terms and Conditions of Engagement for Auditors and Auditing Firms as amended on 1 January 2002

The valuation expert has computed the business value based on the unrounded figures. For ease of presentation, rounded figures have been used in the valuation opinion and audit report, so that rounding differences may arise in the tables and the text.

-III-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

List of Abbreviations

€	Euro
$	US dollars
AAB	General Terms and Conditions of Engagement
Abs.	Paragraph
AEVI	AEVI International GmbH, Paderborn
AG	Aktiengesellschaft (Joint Stock Corporation)
AktG	German Stock Corporation Act
Agreement	DPLA between Wincor Nixdorf and Diebold KGaA together with the letter of support of Diebold Inc. (final draft of 16 August 2016)
AMER	America (North and South America; economic area with approximately same stock exchange opening hours; segment of the Wincor Nixdorf by supplementary regional segment information)
APAC	Asia-Pacific (East Asia, Southeast Asia, Australia and Oceania; economic area with approximately the same stock exchange opening hours)
APAC & MEA	Asia-Pacific & Middle-East-Africa (East Asia, Southeast Asia, Australia and Oceania and Arabia (Middle East) and Africa; economic area with approximately the same stock exchange opening hours; Segment of Wincor Nixdorf by supplementary regional segment information)
ATM	Automated Teller Machine (ATM)
BaFin	Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, Bonn and Frankfurt am Main
Banking	Segment of Wincor Nixdorf by primary segmentation
BGB	Civil Code
BGH	Federal Supreme Court, Karlsruhe
bn	billion(s)
Bloomberg	Bloomberg L.P., New York City
Brink’s	Brink’s Nederland B.V., Houten (now renamed “SecurCash Nederland B.V., Rotterdam”)
B.V.	besloten vennootschap met beperkte aansprakelijkheid (Dutch corporate form; comparable to a German Unternehmergesellschaft)
BVerfG	Federal Constitutional Court, Karlsruhe
BVerfGE	Collection of the Decisions of the Federal Constitutional Court (journal)

-IV-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

BvR	Case number of a constitutional appeal to the Federal Constitutional Court
CAGR	Compound annual growth rate (geometric average annual growth rate)
CAPM	Capital asset pricing model (capital market model based on the portfolio theory)
CDAX	Composite DAX (broades German equities index)
CIQ	S&P Capital IQ, a business of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York City
Co.	Compagnie (reference to several shareholders)
Company	Wincor Nixdorf
Contractual Report	Joint report of the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf and the management of Diebold KGaA (final draft of 16 August 2016) pursuant to § 293a of the German Stock Corporation Act concerning the Agreement
DAX	German Equities Index
Diebold Group	Diebold Inc. together with its dependent companies in the terms of § 17 of the German Stock Corporation Act, but without the Wincor Nixdorf Group
Diebold Inc.	Diebold, Inc., North Canton, Ohio, USA
Diebold KGaA	Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, Eschborn
DPLA	Domination and Profit an Loss Transfer Agreement
EBITA	Earnings before interest, taxes and amortization of goodwill
EBITDA	Earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortization of goodwill
EBT	Earnings before tax
EMEA	Europe-Middle-East-Africa (Europe, Arabia (Middle East) and Africa; economic area with approximately the same Stock exchange opening hours)
EPOS	Electronic point of sale (further development of the POS)
EU	European Union
e.V.	Registered Association
FAUB	Expert Committee for Enterprise Valuation and Business Administration of the IDW
FC	Forecast (extrapolation)
FinTech	Financial Technology (state-of-the-art technologies in the field of financial services)
GDP	Gross domestic product

-V-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

GM	General Shareholders’ Meeting
GmbH	Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (limited liability company)
GuV	Income statement
Hardware	Business type of the Wincor Nixdorf Group, Segment by supplementary segment information
HFA	IDW Auditing and Accounting Board
HGB	Commercial Code
HRB	Commercial Register, Division B
Ed.	Published by
i.d.F.	as amended
IDW	German Independent Auditor’s Institute
IDW S 1	IDW Standard: principles for the performance of enterprise valuations (IDW S 1 as amended in 2008) of 2 April 2008
IFRS	International Financial Reporting Standards
Inc.	Incorporated (Anglo-Saxon corporate form; comparable to the AG)
IT	Information technology
KG	Kommanditgesellschaft (limited partnership)
KGaA	Kommanditgesellschaft auf Aktien (partnership limited by shares)
KPMG	KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Berlin, Bielefeld Branch
KSt	Corporate income tax
LG	District Court
L.P.	Limited Partnership (Anglo-Saxon corporate form; comparable to the GmbH)
MDAX	Mid-Cap DAX (equities index)
MEA	Middle-East-Africa (Europe, Arabia (Middle East) and Africa)
mn	million(s)
mPOS	Mobile point of sale (further development of the POS)
MSCI World	global equities index
n.a.	not available
NCR	NCR Corporation, Duluth, Georgia, USA
NV	naamloze vennootschap (Anglo-Saxon corporate form; comparable to the AG)
No.	number

-VI-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

OLG	Higher Regional Court
p.a.	per annum (per year)
Peer Group	Group of (publicly listed) comparative companies
POS	Point of sale
Projective	Projective NV, Brussels
PwC	PricewaterhouseCoopers AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main
R&D	Research and development
Retail	Segment of Wincor Nixdorf by primary segmentation
SCO	Self-checkout system(s)
SDAX	Small-Cap DAX (equities index)
Software	Business type of the Wincor Nixdorf Group, for additional segment information, summarized into Software/Services
SolZ	Solidarity Surcharge
SWOT	Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats; instrument for strategic planning, developed by Harvard Business School)
US	United States (of America)
USA	United States of America
VDAX	DAX Volatility Index
Valuation Opinion	Opinion of PwC for the business value of Wincor Nixdorf as of 26 September 2016 concerning the planned conclusion of a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement between Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf pursuant to § 291(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act
Valuation Expert	PwC
Valuation Object	Wincor Nixdorf
Wincor Nixdorf	Wincor Nixdorf AG, Paderborn
Wincor Nixdorf Group	Wincor Nixdorf together with its dependent companies in the terms of § 17 of the German Stock Corporation Act
WpG	Die Wirtschaftsprüfung (journal)
WpÜG	Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act
WpÜG-AngVO	Bid Ordinance to the Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act

-VII-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

A. Engagement and Performance of the Engagement

Diebold Holding Germany Inc. & Co. KGaA, Eschborn

(“Diebold KGaA”)

as controlling company and

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn,

(“Wincor Nixdorf,” the “Company“or the “Valuation Object”)

(together with its dependent companies in the terms of § 17 of the German Stock Corporation Act

the “Wincor Nixdorf Group”)

as controlled company intend to conclude a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement in the terms of § 291(1) Sentence 1 of the German Stock Corporation Act (“DPLA”) (the “Agreement”). The validity of the Agreement is subject pursuant to § 293, Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the German Stock Corporation Act to the approval of the shareholders of both parties in general meeting. The Agreement is to be presented to the shareholders at the General Meeting (“GM”) of Diebold KGaA on or prior to 26 September 2016 respectively of Wincor Nixdorf on 26 September 2016.

Pursuant to §§ 304 and 305 of the German Stock Corporation Act, the minority shareholders are to be granted an adequate cash compensation or an adequate recurring compensation. The Agreement must be reviewed in particular with respect to the adequacy of the compensation and compensation by one or more expert auditors (§§ 293b(1) and 293e(1), Sentence 2 of the German Stock Corporation Act).

The District Court of Dortmund selected us as joint contractual auditor of the DPLA between Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf pursuant to §§ 293(1), 293c(1), 293d of the German Stock Corporation Act and appointed us by order of 1 June 2016 (Case No. 20 O 21/16 AktE; see Annex 1).

The appointment order does not contain any specifications concerning the conduct of the audit and the audit report. Insofar as specific questions are discussed in typical fashion in award proceedings in corporate law, we will address those questions at the suitable point in time.

-1-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

With the determination of the business value of Wincor Nixdorf, the amount of the adequate cash compensation pursuant to § 304 of the German Stock Corporation Act and the amount of the adequate recurring compensation pursuant to § 305 of the German Stock Corporation Act per no-par-value share of Wincor Nixdorf, the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf and the management of Diebold KGaA, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Diebold Inc., North Canton, Ohio, USA (“Diebold Inc.”, together with its dependent companies in the terms of § 17 of the German Stock Corporation Act but not including the Wincor Nixdorf Group, the “Diebold Group”) have commissioned PricewaterhouseCoopers AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Frankfurt am Main (“PwC” or the “Valuation Expert”).

The statements on the business value of Wincor Nixdorf and on the determination of the adequate cash compensation and recurring compensation from the opinion issued on this date concerning the business value of Wincor Nixdorf as of 26 September 2016 for the planned conclusion of a DPLA between Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf pursuant to § 291(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act (“Valuation Opinions”) have been substantively adopted by the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf and the management of Diebold KGaA in full.

A copy of the full version of the Valuation Opinion is attached as Annex 5 to the Joint Report of the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf and of the management of Diebold KGaA pursuant to § 293a of the German Stock Corporation Act concerning the Agreement (“Contractual Report,” final draft of 16 August 2016).

We commenced our audit in application of §§ 293d and 293e of the German Stock Corporation Act, after a prior examination as to our independence and freedom from bias and after taking note of our appointment by the court, on 3 June 2016 and performed the audit until today, 16 August 2016, at the business premises of Wincor Nixdorf and in our offices in Düsseldorf.

During the audit, we conducted many discussions with the officers of Wincor Nixdorf and the staff of the Valuation Expert on-site at the business premises of Wincor Nixdorf in Paderborn and in the course of telephone conversations and conference calls.

The subject of our audit was the DPLA in accordance with § 293(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act and in accordance with § 293e(1), Sentence 2 of the German Stock Corporation Act the adequacy of the proposed cash compensation and the proposed recurring compensation.

-2-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In order to be able to carry out an efficient valuation and audit with the requisite confidentiality, access to a virtual data room was established in light of the large quantity of documents provided from June 2016. In addition, we received other documents, in particular from the Valuation Expert.

In particular, the following documents were available to us:

• Contractual Report (final draft of 16 August 2016), including the Agreement concluded on that date (final draft of 16 August 2016), a copy of which was attached to the Report as Annex 3

• Valuation Opinion of 16 August 2016

• Extracts from the working papers of PwC for the analysis of the financial, liquidity and earnings position of the period under consideration, the adjustment of the earnings position, the analysis of the forecast accuracy, the market and competitive relations, the forecast, and the transfer to the perpetual results and other data relevant for the valuation, particularly the derivation of the capital costs and the model used to derive the value

• consolidated forecast of Wincor Nixdorf prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) for the financial years from 2015/16 up to 2017/18, including the related ancillary calculations and explanatory notes, which were approved by the Supervisory Board on 23 September 2015 (Financial Year 2015/16) or taken note of (Financial Years 2016/17 and 2017/18)

• the projection for Financial Year 2015/16 (“Forecast”, “FC”) based on the unaudited actual figures for the first nine months of Financial Year 2015/16 and the updated forecast for Financial Years 2016/17 and 2017/18 based on the effects from the sale of the Chinese business activities, which were taken note of by the Supervisory Board on 27 July 2016

• presentations, breakdowns and other evidence and statements of the working group set up by Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf to identify, classify and quantify synergies from the merger

• Joint Opinion in accordance with § 27(1) of the Securities Acquisition and Takeover Act by the Management and Supervisory Boards of Wincor Nixdorf on the voluntary public takeover bid (combined cash and swap offer) of Diebold Inc.

-3-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

• reports of KPMG AG Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft, Berlin, Bielefeld Branch (“KPMG”), on the audit of the consolidated financial statements and consolidated management reports of Wincor Nixdorf for Financial Years 2012/13 to 2014/15 prepared in accordance with IFRS and the supplementary provisions of commercial law pursuant to § 315a(1) of the Commercial Code, all of which were issued with an unqualified auditor’s opinion

• reports from KPMG on the audit of the annual financial statements and management reports of Wincor Nixdorf for Financial Years 2012/13 to 2014/15 prepared in accordance with the Commercial Code, all of which were issued with an unqualified auditor’s opinion

• reports from KPMG on the audit of the annual financial statements and management reports of Wincor Nixdorf International GmbH, Paderborn, for Financial Years 2012/13 to 2014/15, all of which were issued with an unqualified auditor’s opinion

• unaudited consolidated interim financial statements of Wincor Nixdorf as of 31 March 2016 and 30 June 2016

• Articles of Association (version of 27 October 2015) and Commercial Register extract (retrieved on 13 July 2016) of Diebold KGaA

• Articles of Association (version of 25 January 2016) and Commercial Register extract (retrieved on 18 April 2016) of Wincor Nixdorf

In addition, we used further publicly available information, e.g. market studies and capital market data. When ascertaining the capital market data, we relied mainly upon data supplied by the financial information service providers S&P Capital IQ, a business of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York City (“CIQ”), and Bloomberg L.P., New York City (“Bloomberg”). The Federal Financial Supervisory Authority, Bonn and Frankfurt am Main (“BaFin”), calculated and communicated the average market price required in accordance with legal rulings to determine a lower limit for the cash compensation.

A draft of the Valuation Opinion was made available to us prior to its completion. Prior versions of the final drafts of the Agreement and Contractual Report presented by us were also presented to us.

-4-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

We conducted our engagement in accordance with Auditing Practice Statement HFA 6/1988 from the Auditing and Accounting Board (“HFA”) of the Institute of Public Auditors in Germany, Düsseldorf (“IDW”), “Audits of Mergers in Accordance with § 340b (4) of the German Stock Corporation Act,” which was withdrawn in 2013 but which remains in effect with respect to the statements it makes concerning the requirements for performance of the audit and the audit report, and in direct accordance with the IDW Standard “Principles for the Performance of Business Valuations” (IDW S 1, version 2008) of 2 April 2008 (“IDW S 1”).

IDW S 1 is not a rule of law and is accordingly non-binding, particularly for courts of law. However, the recommendations made in that Standard do provide the courts with a source of information concerning the methodologically correct procedure for the performance of valuations through fundamental analysis in order to verify the adequacy of the cash compensation and recurring compensation (e.g. Federal Supreme Court of 29 September 2015, Case No. II ZB 23/14).

All of the information and documents we requested were willingly provided to us. The Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf and the management of Diebold Inc. as general partner of Diebold KGaA provided us as of this date a standard declaration of general representativeness in each case and represented therein in writing that the explanatory notes and information of significance for the audit of the Agreement were provided in a complete and accurate fashion.

The results of our audit are based primarily on our audit of the documents of Wincor Nixdorf, on information provided to us by the named respondents, on the Valuation Opinion and additional information provided by the Valuation Expert. In addition to the information received in this way, we also conducted additional investigations and calculations of our own.

We have recorded the type and scope of our audit procedures in our working papers.

We initiated our audit before PwC concluded its valuation. This method of procedure is common within the framework of contractual and adequacy audits and recognized by high court rulings (Federal Supreme Court of 18 September 2006, II ZR 225/04). It is rooted in the need to issue a conclusive audit assessment promptly after the conclusion of the valuation.

-5-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

There were no divergent opinions between the Valuation Expert and ourselves. Audit findings were incorporated into the valuation model.

The management of Diebold KGaA and the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf are responsible for the due content of the Contractual Report.

We further expressly point out that we have not conducted an audit of the bookkeeping, consolidated financial statements and consolidated management reports, annual financial statements and management statements, or the management of the companies involved. Such examinations were not a subject of our audit. The compliance of the audited financial statements presented with the relevant statutory provisions has been confirmed by the auditor of the financial statements without qualification. We therefore assume in this regard that the documents presented to us are accurate in terms of the completeness of the financial statements and their compliance with rules of measurement for financial statements.

If, in the time between the conclusion of our audit (16 August 2016) and the scheduled date for the adoption of the resolution by the shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf in general meeting concerning the closing of the Agreement (26 September 2016), significant changes should arise relative to the assumptions made in the Valuation Opinion by PwC or this audit report, these changes would have to be taken into account in the determination of adequate cash compensation or recurring compensation. For this purpose, we will obtain declarations on the date of the general shareholders’ meeting of Wincor Nixdorf.

We issue the following report concerning the results of our audit pursuant to § 293e of the German Stock Corporation Act.

This audit report was prepared exclusively for the purposes stated above. This includes provision of the audit report in advance of the GM of Wincor Nixdorf at which the resolution concerning the conclusion of the Agreement (including its publication on the Company’s website, or for other publications, displays and measures in connection with the preparation and execution of the GM) and presentation before the competent court of law (also any court proceedings following the GM).

-6-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Any disclosure of our audit report beyond this may only be made, subject to our express written approval, with the complete text and with a written declaration about the purpose of the underlying engagement and the disclosure restrictions and terms of liability associated with the engagement, and may only be made to third parties if the relevant third party previously consents in writing to the General Terms and Conditions of Engagement, to an additional individual liability agreement, and to a binding non-disclosure obligation towards us.

The General Terms and Conditions of Engagement for Auditors and Auditing Firms, as amended on 1 January 2002, which are attached as Annex 3, apply for the conduct of the engagement and our responsibility, e.g. with respect to third parties. For our responsibility relative to the contractual parties and their shareholders, § 293d (2) as related to § 323c of the German Stock Corporation Act apply.

-7-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

B. Subject, Type and Scope of the Contractual Audit

The subject, type and scope of the contractual audit result from §§ 293b(1), 293e(1), Sentence 2 of the German Stock Corporation Act. Pursuant to § 293b(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act, the subject of our audit is the agreement between business enterprises. Pursuant to § 293e(1), Sentence 2 of the German Stock Corporation Act, the focus of our audit is the assessment of the adequacy of the cash compensation (§ 304 of the German Stock Corporation Act) and recurring compensation (§ 305 of the German Stock Corporation Act). Details on the content of the Contractual Audit Report are evident in § 293e(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act.

Accordingly, we checked whether the Agreement fully and accurately contains the components prescribed by law and thus corresponds to the provisions of law. We also checked whether the proposed cash compensation and recurring compensation are to be viewed as adequate with due regard to the circumstances at Wincor Nixdorf. We have not undertaken any further legal audit, particularly of the tax effects, nor have we audited the expediency of the Agreement or the procedure. The completeness and accuracy of the Contractual Report also did not form part of our contractual audit.

In its Auditing Practice Statement HFA 6/1988 on merger audits, the IDW Auditing and Accounting Board (“HFA”) established key principles with respect to the division of labor between the management board and the merger auditors, and in particular, defined the methods which are to be used to ascertain adequacy. The recommendations made in HFA 6/1988 are, according to the prevailing view, also applicable for audits of agreements in accordance with § 293e of the German Stock Corporation Act and generally still apply even after the withdrawal of the Standard. We therefore used them as the basis for our audit.

The audit includes an assessment as to whether the methods used to calculate the cash compensation and recurring compensation are consistent with generally accepted principles for the performance of business valuations, whether the data used for that purpose were properly derived and whether the estimates for the future appear plausible. It is not the task of the auditor to perform the valuation which is necessary in order to derive the cash compensation and recurring compensation on its own.

-8-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The expert auditor who is appointed pursuant to §§ 293b(1), 293c(1) and 293d(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act must prepare a written report concerning the results of the audit in accordance with § 293e of the German Stock Corporation Act. The audit report must conclude with a declaration as to whether the proposed cash compensation or recurring compensation are adequate or not.

The report must also indicate

• the methods which were used to determine the cash compensation and recurring compensation;

• the reasons why the use of these methods was appropriate;

• which cash compensation or recurring compensation results when various methods are applied, if more than one method was applied; the report must also explain what weight was assigned to the various methods in determining the proposed cash compensation or recurring compensation and the values underlying that cash compensation or recurring compensation, as well as any particular difficulties which arose in connection with the valuation.

Our audit report indicates the results of our audit as to the adequacy of the proposed cash compensation and recurring compensation and, in that context, fully explains the audit procedure and the results of the audit in detail. In the interests of avoiding repetition, we refer to the detailed statements in the Valuation Opinion, which is attached to the Contractual Report as an annex, for detailed figures and explanations regarding the determination of earnings and value components.

As a result, the recipients of this report will be able to comprehend the adequacy of the cash compensation payment and recurring compensation based on our audit report alone, but may have to consult the Contractual Report for further detailed information, particularly the attached Valuation Opinion.

-9-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

C. Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

I. Content of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The minimum content of a DPLA necessary in corporate law results from §§ 291 ff. of the German Stock Corporation Act. The audit of the completeness and accuracy of the agreement between business enterprises therefore relates to the general information on the contractual parties, the definition of the subject of the agreement, the commencement and term of the agreement and the arrangements concerning settlement payments and indemnities.

Corporate Name and Registered Office of the Participating Companies

The corporate name and registered office of the participating companies are specified in the DPLA and correspond to the entries in the commercial registers of Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf.

Management (§ 1 of the Agreement)

Pursuant to § 1(1) of the Agreement, Wincor Nixdorf subjugates the management of its company to Diebold KGaA. Accordingly, Diebold KGaA is entitled to issue instructions to the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf regarding the management of the company both generally and in specific cases. This right to give instructions does not extend to the modification, maintenance or cessation of the Agreement.

In addition to § 1(2) of the Agreement, the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf is obliged to follow the instructions of Diebold KGaA.

For purposes of legal certainty, § 1(3) of the Agreement stipulates that instructions must be made in text form or, if issued verbally, must be confirmed in text form without delay.

The subjugation of the management of the company is a constitutive component of a control agreement. The provisions of the Agreement in this regard corresponds to the specifications in §§ 291(1) Sentence 1, 299 and 308 of the German Stock Corporation Act.

-10-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Profit Transfer (§ 2 of the Agreement)

In accordance with § 2(1) of the Agreement, Wincor Nixdorf agrees to transfer its entire profit to Diebold KGaA. This provision is a constitute component of a profit and loss absorption agreement (§ 291(1), 2^nd Alternative of the German Stock Corporation Act).

Subject to the establishment or reversal of reserves in accordance with § 2(2) of the Agreement, the maximum permissible amount pursuant to § 301 of the German Stock Corporation Act as amended is to be transferred, i.e. according to the current state of law, at maximum the net income arising without the profit transfer, reduced by any loss carry-forward from the previous year, by the amount which is to be transferred to the legal reserves in accordance with § 300(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act, and the non-distributable amounts in accordance with § 268(8) of the Commercial Code.

Pursuant to § 2(2) of the Agreement, Wincor Nixdorf may, with the approval of Diebold KGaA, transfer amounts from the net income to other earnings reserves, provided this is permitted by commercial law and financially justified upon a reasonable commercial assessment. Reserves formed in this way can be withdrawn again at the request of Diebold KGaA and transferred as profit. The use of other reserves or a profit carry-forward from the period before the start of the Agreement in order to transfer profit or to compensate a net loss is ruled out in accordance with § 2(2) Sentence 3 of the Agreement.

The obligation to transfer profit initially applies upon the entry of the Agreement in the Commercial Register of the company for the then current financial year and is respectively upon adoption of the annual financial statements for the relevant financial year of Wincor Nixdorf (§ 2(3) as related to § 7(2) of the Agreement).

Through a linkage to the provisions of law as amended, it is ensured that the provisions on the on the profit transfer will be permissible at all times.

-11-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Loss Transfer (§ 3 of the Agreement)

In accordance with § 3(1) of the Agreement, Diebold KGaA is obliged in relation to Wincor Nixdorf pursuant to the provisions of § 302 of the German Stock Corporation Act in their entirety and as amended to absorb losses.

In accordance with the current version of § 302 of the German Stock Corporation Act, Diebold KGaA must thus compensate any net loss arising during the term of contract, provided such is not compensated by the fact that contributions placed in other earnings reserves during the term of contract are withdrawn from the other earnings reserves (§ 302(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act).

The obligation of Diebold KGaA to compensate losses falls due at the close of each financial year of Wincor Nixdorf (§ 3(2) as related to § 7(2) of the Agreement). In the event the Agreement is terminated during the year, the loss compensation is to be calculated based on a balance sheet as of the cutoff date (§ 3(3) of the Agreement).

Through a linkage to the provisions of law as amended, it is ensured that the provisions on the on the loss absorption will be permissible at all times.

Recurring Compensation (§ 4 of the Agreement)

Diebold KGaA guarantees the minority shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf pursuant to § 4, Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Agreement for the term of the Agreement as adequate recurring compensation for each full financial year of Wincor Nixdorf for each no-par-value bearer share of Wincor Nixdorf with an imputed value in the capital stock of € 1.00 the payment of a gross settlement of € 3.17 less any amount for corporate income tax and a solidarity surcharge according to the tax rate applicable for these taxes for the respective financial year. This deduction is only to be made from the partial amount, relating to the profits reduced by German corporate income tax, contained in the gross settlement amount. In the present case, this is a partial amount of € 1.99. According to the circumstances on the closing date of the Agreement, the deduction for corporate income tax (15.0%) and the solidarity surcharge (5.5% of the corporate income tax) amounts to € 0.32 per share, resulting in net settlement of € 2.85.

-12-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The granting of a fixed settlement payment in exercise of the option in accordance with § 304(2) of the German Stock Corporation Act is in keeping with the provisions of law (§ 304, Paragraph 1, Sentence 1, Paragraph 2, Sentence 1 of the German Stock Corporation Act).

Regarding the computation of the settlement payment and the audit of its adequacy, we refer to our statements on the derivation of the settlement payment from the business value in Section C.V.

The recurring compensation is due on the first banking day after the annual GM of Wincor Nixdorf for the financial year just closed, though at the latest 8 months after the expiration of the financial year (§ 4(2) Sentence 5 of the Agreement).

The recurring compensation is initially granted for the financial year of Wincor Nixdorf in which the Agreement is validly entered in the Commercial Register of Wincor Nixdorf and thus becomes effective (§ 4(3) as related to § 7(2) of the Agreement).

The recurring compensation is reduced on a profited basis in the case of a stub period of Wincor Nixdorf or in the case of the cessation of the Agreement in the course of a financial year of Wincor Nixdorf (§ 4(4) of the Agreement).

§ 4(5) of the Agreement, which stipulates how to proceed in the case of capital increases using corporate funds or through cash or non-cash contributions confirms the prevailing view in legal literature.

§ 4(6) of the Agreement corresponds to the provisions of law in § 13 of the Act on Judicial Review Proceedings and stipulates that in the case of a higher guaranteed recurring compensation declared in a non-appealable fashion in a judicial review proceeding or by way of a recurring compensation to avert or end a judicial review proceeding, such recurring compensation also has effect against shareholders who have meanwhile been indemnified.

-13-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Cash Compensation (§ 5 of the Agreement)

In accordance with § 5(1) of the Agreement, Diebold KGaA agrees at the request of any outside shareholder of Wincor Nixdorf to acquire such shareholder’s shares in return for a cash compensation of € 53.34 per no-par-value share. Because Diebold KGaA itself is a majority-owned partnership limited by shares and the majority shareholder, Diebold Inc., has its registered office in the United States, no other compensation than a cash compensation is permissible (§ 305(2) of the German Stock Corporation Act).

Regarding the computation of the cash compensation and the audit of its adequacy, we refer to our statements on the audit of the business value and the cash compensation in Sections C.II. to C.IV.

§ 5(2) of the Agreement stipulates the time limit for the acquisition of the shares and corresponds to § 305(4) of the German Stock Corporation Act.

§ 5(3) of the Agreement, which stipulates how to proceed in the case of capital increases using corporate funds or through cash or non-cash contributions, is confirmed by the prevailing view in the legal literature.

§ 5(4) of the Agreement corresponds to the provisions of law in § 13 of the Act on Judicial Review Proceedings, stipulating that in the case of a higher agreed compensation declared in a non-appealable fashion in judicial review proceeding or by way of a settlement to avert or end a judicial review proceeding, such compensation also has effect against shareholders who have meanwhile been indemnified.

§ 5(5) of the Agreement stipulates the modalities for settling the compensation. The law does not specify anything in this regard.

No accrual of interest is stipulated in the Agreement, nor is any necessary. Accordingly, the provision of law applies in accordance with which the compensation is to accrue interest after the day on which the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement has become valid at an annual rate of 5%-points above the respective risk-free rate in accordance with § 247 of the Civil Code and the assertion of any further damage is not ruled out (§ 305(3) Sentence 3 of the German Stock Corporation Act).

-14-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Right to Information (§ 6 of the Agreement)

In § 6 of the Agreement, Diebold KGaA is granted rights to information and Wincor Nixdorf is obliged to provide information.

According to general opinion, the right to information of the controlling enterprise is a component of the group executive control following from § 308(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act. This clarifying provision is therefore not objectionable.

Effective Date and Term of the Agreement (§ 7 of the Agreement)

In conformance with the provisions of law, § 7, Paragraphs 1 and 2 of the Agreement stipulate that the prior approval of the GM is required of both Wincor Nixdorf and Diebold KGaA as is the additional approval of Diebold Inc. as general partner of Diebold KGaA, and that the Agreement is first valid upon its entry in the Commercial Register of Wincor Nixdorf.

§ 7, Paragraphs 3 to 7 of the Agreement contain provisions relating to the term and cessation of the DPLA.

For tax reasons, a minimum term of 60 months is agreed (§ 7(3) Sentence 3 of the Agreement).

The legal stipulations relating to termination for good cause (§ 297(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act) have been observed (§ 7, Paragraphs 4 and 5 of the Agreement).

§ 7(6) of the Agreement refers to the requirement to provide the creditors of Wincor Nixdorf collateral in the case of a cessation of the Agreement in accordance with § 303 of the German Stock Corporation Act.

-15-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Letter of Support (§ 8 of the Agreement)

§ 8 of the Agreement indicates that Diebold Inc. in its capacity as direct partner of Diebold KGaA, without joining the Agreement as a party, has issued a letter of support to Wincor Nixdorf. This independent declaration issued on 16 August 2016 does not form part of the Agreement, but is attached to the Agreement as part of Annex 3 to the Contractual Report.

According to the declaration issued, Diebold Inc. agrees unrestrictedly and irrevocably to ensure that Diebold KGaA will be equipped financially so that Diebold KGaA is always in the position to fully fulfill its liabilities from or in connection with the Agreement in due time (hard letter of support). This applies in particular to the duty to absorb losses in accordance with § 302 of the German Stock Corporation Act as amended. In this regard, Diebold Inc. also agrees unrestrictedly and irrevocably in relation to the minority shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf that Diebold KGaA will fully fulfill in due time all its obligations existing from or in connection with the Agreement, particularly to pay any cash compensation and recurring compensation.

Hence, the minority shareholders are granted an additional claim to payment against Diebold KGaA beyond what is required by law.

Final Provisions (§ 9 of the Agreement)

The provisions in § 9 of the Agreement: Paragraph 1 (Severability), Paragraph 2 (No Uniform Agreement with the Letter of Support or other Legal Transactions or Agreements Made or Concluded between the Parties or between Wincor Nixdorf and Diebold Inc.), Paragraph 3 (Requirement for the Written Form) and Paragraph 4 (Place of Jurisdiction), are standard parts of agreements and are not objectionable.

Audit Finding

As a finding of our audit, we conclude that the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement fully and accurately contains the components prescribed in §§ 291 ff. of the German Stock Corporation Act and thus corresponds to the provisions of law.

Preamble

Diebold KGaA and Wincor Nixdorf have preceded the Agreement (final draft of 16 August 2016) with a Preamble specifying possible revised versions of §§ 4 and 5 of the Agreement.

-16-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The statements in §§ 4 and 5 of the Agreement are based on a risk-free rate (before personal taxes) of 0.7%, which reflects the present circumstances as of the time the draft was finalized. In the current market environment, however, the possibility cannot be ruled out that the risk-free rate as of 26 September 2016, the date of Wincor Nixdorf’s extraordinary GM at which the DPLA is to be presented to the shareholders for approval, will be different.

For example, the Preamble contains the amounts of the cash compensation and recurring compensation in the event the risk-free rate as of 26 September 2016 decreases to 0.6% (a) or 0.5% (b), or if it increases to 0.8% (c). The Parties also point out that the possibility still cannot be ruled out that the risk-free rate could even fall below 0.5% or climb above 0.8% under certain circumstances. Such a change in the interest rate level would affect calculation of the cash compensation and recurring compensation beyond the scenarios presented in a) through c).

The impact of a change in the risk-free rate or of other events of relevance to the valuation occurring between the date on which the valuation was completed (16 August 2016) and the date of the GM at which the resolution is to be adopted (26 September 2016) on determination of the adequate cash compensation and adequate recurring compensation is shown in the Valuation Opinion in table form.

With respect to the audit findings concerning the scenario analyses which were performed by the Valuation Expert in a simplified manner, based on the assumption that all other valuation parameters and methods would remain unchanged, we refer to our statements in Sections C.IV.8 (valuation and cash compensation) and C.V.4. (recurring compensation).

II. Methods for the Calculation of the Business Value and Cash Compensation

1. General Remarks

In accordance with § 305, Paragraphs 1 and 2, No. 3 of the German Stock Corporation Act, the controlling enterprise must offer the minority shareholders the acquisition of shares in return for adequate cash compensation.

Compensation is adequate if it equals the full value of the share in the company. Departing shareholders should receive the full intrinsic value of their shares in the operating company (Order of the Federal Constitutional Court of 27 April 1999, Case No. 1 BvR 1613/94, BVerfGE 100, 289 et seq.). Decisive is therefore the value of the business as a whole. This thus is in keeping with the postulate developed by legal rulings of a full value compensation.

-17-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

There is no method prescribed by law for business valuations. The value of a company is based on the benefit which the company can provide in the future based on its intrinsic value at the time of the valuation, its innovativeness, its products and market position, its internal organization and its management while preserving its intrinsic value.

Generally accepted valuation principles have emerged in business administration doctrine, the case law and valuation practice which are applied in the performance of business valuations. These principles are reflected in particular in the IDW S 1 Standard.

In conformance with long-standing valuation practice and German legal rulings, in accordance with the IDW S 1 standard, the value per share is generally to be derived, for the purposes of determining the cash compensation in connection with the conclusion of the DPLA, from an objectified business value, with direct consideration of the taxation of shareholders. This objectified business value represents the inter-subjective value of verifiable future earnings from the perspective of the typical domestic shareholder with an unlimited tax liability assuming the company is continued with concept unchanged.

-18-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

2. Value of Future Earnings

Assuming exclusively financial objectives, the value of a company is determined as the value of future earnings, i.e. the present value of the net income to shareholders associated with ownership of the company. The value of future earnings can be determined using the earnings value method or the discounted cash flow method.

Both valuation methods are essentially equivalent and yield identical results given the same valuation assumptions and simplifications, particularly with respect to financing, since both methods have the same theoretical basis (calculation of capital value).

Earnings Value

Earnings value is determined as the present value of future cash flows to shareholders, discounted using the discount rate, which are derived from future net income from assets necessary for operations, as well as proceeds from the sale of assets which are not necessary for operations and other separately valued assets.

Forecasting future earnings is the core problem in any valuation. The company’s historical earnings power generally serves as a starting point for evaluating the plausibility of earnings forecasts. The valuation may only take into account earnings arising from measures which have already been initiated, or from concepts which have been sufficiently documented and specified. Insofar as the future earnings outlook may differ for reasons pertaining to the company itself, or to a change in market and competitive conditions, all recognizable differences are to be taken into account.

“Real synergies,” including measures which could not be implemented without executing the measure which is the reason for the valuation, are not to be taken into account, while “pseudo synergies” are to be taken into account insofar as they relate to the valuation object.

In determining the objectified business value, it is to be assumed that the earnings which are actually available for distribution with due regard for the company concept which is documented as of the valuation date (including forecasted distributions) and legal restrictions (e.g. regulatory specifications) will be distributed to shareholders.

-19-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Insofar as the forecast distinguishes between two different phases, earnings for the first phase, the “detailed forecast phase” are to be divided into distributions and retained earnings, including use of retained earnings in the forecast itself.

For the second phase, the so-called “perpetual annuity” phase, it is generally assumed that the company’s distribution practices will be equivalent to those of the alternative investment. As for the reinvestment of retained earnings in the second phase of the forecast, it is also generally assumed that this can be reflected either through a value-neutral investment using the discount rate before the company’s income tax or in equivalent fashion by directly attributing retained earnings to shareholders.

The Impact of Taxes on Income

In accordance with IDW’s recommendations, net income which is to be discounted is to be determined with due regard for taxes on the company’s income, as well as, generally speaking, taxes on the income of the shareholders based on their ownership of the company.

IDW S 1 distinguishes between different ways of modeling shareholders’ tax situation depending on the reason for the valuation. While indirect modeling of the shareholder’s tax situation is considered appropriate when determining an objectified valuation in connection with company initiatives, direct modeling is to be used for valuations which are undertaken for statutory reasons, by means of appropriate assumptions with respect to shareholders’ personal income taxes, future cash flows and the discount rate. The modeling of personal tax rates in valuations which are conducted for statutory reasons prevents a situation in which the objectified valuation depends on the personal tax situation of each individual shareholder.

The corporate tax reform of 2008 had a direct impact on the discounting of future cash flows, affecting both the company’s tax situation and the personal taxes of the typical shareholder. With respect to the taxation of shareholders, the half-income method for dividends and the general non-taxation of capital gains resulting from increases in value (increases in share price) has been replaced by the flat tax system, under which capital gains are also subject to the flat tax.

The flat tax rate, including the solidarity surcharge but not church tax, is 26.375%, and applies in full for distributed earnings. Due to the impact of interest rates, the effective tax rate for capital gains generated through retained earnings depends on the period of time for which the individual shareholder held the shares.

-20-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

As for the assumption with respect to the effective tax rate for capital gains, it is appropriate, in the view of IDW’s Valuation Committee (“FAUB”), to generally assume that the typical shareholder has held shares for a long period of time, so that the effective tax rate on retained earnings is correspondingly low.

For valuation dates on or after 1 January 2009, a typical effective tax rate for capital gains of 12.5% is recommended, plus the solidarity surcharge, i.e. half the nominal tax rate. Given an after-tax rate of return of 5.0%, this corresponds to a holding period of about 40 years.

The impact of the 2008 corporate tax reform on determination of the discount rate is to be taken into account indirectly through possible changes to the rate of return required by investors before and after personal income taxes and the resulting market risk premiums.

-21-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Discounting of Future Cash Flows

Dividends and capital gains, diminished by the shareholder’s personal tax rate, arise based on cash flows for the company, which occur at various times. The value of future earnings is determined by discounting future cash flows to the valuation date. The function of the discount rate in business valuations is therefore to make future cash flows equivalent to present cash flows by discounting them to the valuation date. This rate also allows the investor to compare the investment against other available alternative investments with equivalent maturities and taxes, with due regard for the uncertainty and inherent risk of an investment in the company.

One starting point in determining the rate of return from alternative investments in connection with the determination of an objectified valuation is the rate of return from investments in companies available in the capital market. This rate of return can essentially be broken down into the risk-free rate and the risk premium.

In valuation theory and practice, the discount rate is therefore determined by finding the rate of return for a virtually risk-free alternative investment (the risk-free rate) and then correcting this rate by incorporating a risk premium for the investment under consideration, the typical investor’s income tax rate and a growth rate.

Valuation of Assets Not Necessary for Operations

If assets exist which are not necessary for operations, these are generally to be taken into account separately in the course of the valuation. This category includes assets which can be freely disposed of without affecting the actual corporate purpose. Valuation as a separate category is also a possibility for other circumstances which cannot be reflected, or can only be incompletely reflected, through determination of the company’s earnings value.

3. Comparative Valuation

Comparative analyses may be performed based on public capital market data and transactions in order to check the plausibility of valuations which are performed based on internal company data.

-22-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

To this end, valuation practitioners often estimate the value of a company by using earnings multiples or multiples of industry-specific data for the valuation object. Suitable multiples are derived either from the capital market data of publicly traded peer group companies or from comparable transactions.

It must be kept in mind that the values which are determined using such multiple-based valuation methods represent only an initial rough estimate. This is due to the fact that some multipliers do not adequately account for company-specific income and cost structures, as well as the fact that specific expected changes with respect to income cannot be taken into account. This is also the case for special circumstances such as loss carry-forwards and assets which are not necessary for operations.

With respect to the multipliers derived based on transaction prices, it also has to be observed that actually paid purchase prices are determined to a great degree by the subjective interests of the transaction partners. They take synergy effects and subjective expectations into account, for example. Hence, the meaningfulness of this approach is normally less than multipliers derived from market prices for checking the plausibility of an objectified business value.

The applicability of such comparative figures to the valuation object is therefore usually limited, but this method does allow the result of the valuation to be classified within unavoidable ranges and subjected to a final overall assessment.

A comparative valuation can also be carried out based on prices which the main shareholder has paid for shares of the enterprise under valuation (“pre-acquisition”). Though, according to legal rulings, pre-acquisition prices are not directly relevant to the determination of a cash compensation, they can be used as a starting point to check the economic plausibility of the prorated business value.

4. Liquidation Value and Intrinsic Value

In accordance with IDW S 1, liquidation value comes into consideration as a lower limit for the valuation if the present value of future cash flows arising in the event of the company’s liquidation exceeds the company’s earnings value assuming its continuation as a going concern.

-23-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Intrinsic value is the reconstruction or replacement value of all of the company’s assets and liabilities. Since intrinsic value generally bears no direct relation to future cash flows, it generally has no independent importance within the context of business valuations.

5. Share Price

In accordance with the aforementioned ruling by the Federal Constitutional Court of 27 April 1999, the full compensation paid to minority shareholders in connection with the conclusion of a company agreement may be no lower than the market value of the shares. For companies whose shares are publicly traded, the Federal Constitutional Court generally views share price as a suitable reference value in determining the market price of the shares.

-24-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

III. Procedure for the Audit of the Valuation and the Cash Compensation

The starting point for our audit of the valuation and the cash compensation derived therefrom was the forecast for the years 2015/16 to 2017/18 (“Detailed Forecast Period”) made by Wincor Nixdorf within the framework of its established planning process. This forecast contains a detailed budget of the initial forecast financial year to be approved by the Supervisory Board and a projection for the two ensuing financial years.

Because the first year of the forecast was already well underway as of the valuation date, the Company undertook in July 2016 based on the actual results as of 30 June 2016 a projection of Financial Year 2015/16 as a whole and replaced the budget for purposes of this valuation with the forecast. Moreover, the Company also considered new information from the sale of the business activities in China and the anticipated pseudo synergies and realization costs from the merger with Diebold Inc. for purposes of this valuation in a revised forecast also for the ensuing forecast years.

In discussions with the employees and representatives of Wincor Nixdorf and the Valuation Expert who were named as sources, the principles and methodology of the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf were explained to us. Written explanations were given to us, and supplemented by verbal explanations, with respect to the market environment, including competitive conditions, the business operations of Wincor Nixdorf, the valuation approach, the status of the valuation work, the plausibility of key forecasts, the independent computation of the financial results and business taxes by the Valuation Expert and the derivation of perpetual results based on the forecast and individual questions relating to the forecast.

Using the documents available to us, as well as additional information which was provided verbally, we checked the forecasts for plausibility, consistency and mathematical accuracy, and we also sought to comprehend the methods and content of the valuation.

-25-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The focus of our audit was on ascertaining

• whether the (updated) forecast plausibly and justifiably reflects the expected development of the Wincor Nixdorf Group;

• whether the forecast has been incorporated into the valuation model;

• whether the derivation of the net income from the presented forecast has been properly undertaken;

• whether the derivation of the perpetual results and perpetual net income can be cogently justified;

• whether the discount rate used in the valuation has been accurately derived;

• whether the valuation method is appropriate and has been properly applied overall;

• whether circumstances exist which are to be reflected in a separate valuation, e.g. assets which are not necessary for operations, and if so, whether these circumstances have been appropriately included in the valuation;

• whether other comparative standards exist, other than earnings value, which can be used to ascertain the adequacy of the cash compensation.

In addition to these substantive areas of focus, our audit also focused on the value of the earnings components and components of net income.

Based on our analysis of historical data using the audit reports for Financial Years 2012/13 through 2014/15, which have been presented to us, as well as other breakdowns and explanations of historical results and development which have been made available to us, we have convinced ourselves in the course of our audit of the earnings value that factors with a substantial impact on historical earnings which cannot be expected to recur were not carried forward as such when determining the forecast results, and are accurately presented in the Valuation Opinion.

Our analysis of the historical data serves as the basis for checking the plausibility of the forecast data.

-26-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In order to assess the quality of the forecast, we first obtained an explanation of the forecasting process of Wincor Nixdorf. To assess the accuracy of the forecasts, we verified the analysis provided by the Valuation Expert of the actual figures (2012/13 to 2014/15) and of the forecast (2015/16) compared to the forecast for the first year (budget year) of the forecasts (prepared in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2015).

On this basis, we examined whether the (updated) forecast of Wincor Nixdorf stands in a plausible relation to the historical figures and the figures from the respective financial years (results, comparative data) and whether the forecast data properly reflect the expected development of the Wincor Nixdorf Group with due regard to expected future market conditions.

We first examined the basic methodology with respect to the derivation of the earnings value based on the forecast of Wincor Nixdorf.

We also examined whether and to what extent the forecast has been incorporated into the valuation model.

The Valuation Expert derived the perpetual results for the phase of the perpetual annuity based on the results of the final year of the Detailed Forecast Period with due regard to the technical transitional year (2018/19), in which the valuation-relevant effects of the merger with Diebold Inc. are to have their full effect. We evaluated this derivation separately.

We conducted additional calculations and evaluations of our own with respect to certain matters relating to the valuation and the assumptions made, particularly the determination of the discount rate. Insofar as findings arose, the Valuation Expert accepted these and integrated them into its valuation model.

In the absence of states of affairs that are to be depicted as separated assets in addition to the discounted net income, particularly in the absence of assets not necessary for operations, the earnings value of the assets necessary for operations corresponds to the business value. We checked the mathematical accuracy of the calculation and the conversion to a single share.

-27-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In the course of our audit, we examined the overall valuation methodology and the assumptions made for purposes of the valuation in terms of their adequacy. In addition to this conceptual review, we examined, using numerous random spot checks, whether the forecasts and the premises of the valuation were incorporated into the valuation model in a mathematically and substantively correct fashion.

The Valuation Expert used multipliers to check the plausibility of the business value, which was arrived at fundamentally by using the earnings value method. We checked the compilations and calculations in that regard and evaluated the results as well. We also checked the plausibility of valuation result by considering pre-acquisition prices.

Since Wincor Nixdorf is to be continued indefinitely as a going concern, and since it is not to be assumed that the earnings value in the event of liquidation would exceed the liquidation value, given the costs which would accrue in the event of liquidation, the Valuation Expert dispensed with a detailed derivation and presentation of the liquidation value in its Valuation Opinion. We verified the considerations made in this regard in the Valuation Opinion.

The share of Wincor Nixdorf is listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange in the Regulated Market (Prime Standard) Segment and admitted to trading on all German stock exchanges. We have therefore also examined the market price of the share as a potential floor for any compensation generally derived from the prorated business value.

-28-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

IV. Audit Findings Concerning the Audit of the Valuation and the Cash Compensation in Particular

1. Valuation Object

a) Legal and Tax Situation

Wincor Nixdorf, the Valuation Object, has its registered office in Paderborn and is entered into the Commercial Register of the Local Court of Paderborn under No. B 6864. Its domestic business address is Heinz-Nixdorf-Ring 1, 33106 Paderborn.

The Articles of Association of Wincor Nixdorf were last amended by resolution of the GM of 25 January 2016 (2014 conditional capital). This amendment to the Articles of Association took effect upon entry into the Commercial Register on 23 March 2016.

Pursuant to § 2 of the Articles of Association, the corporate purpose is management of a corporate group of domestic and foreign companies with activities in the fields of research, development, production, sales, installation and leasing of products and solutions for electronic data processing and transmission and other system equipment in innovative technologies, as well as consulting, training and services for this business. The company may operate on its own in the areas designated above or limit itself to managing its holdings.

The company may execute all transactions and perform all actions which are suitable to further the corporate purpose, directly or indirectly. To this end, the company may form, acquire and purchase shares in other companies. The company may establish branch offices in Germany and abroad with the same or different corporate names.

Wincor Nixdorf’s financial year begins on 1 October of each year and ends on 30 September of the next year.

The company’s fully paid-in capital stock amounts to € 33,084,988.00 and is divided into 33,084,988 no-par-value bearer shares of the same class, with a mathematical share of the capital stock of € 1.00 per share.

-29-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The Articles of Association contain the authorization to increase the capital stock by up to € 16,542,494.00 in exchange for a cash and/or non-cash contribution (2014 authorized capital). In addition, the capital stock has been conditionally increased by € 10,000,000.00 for the provision of options and convertible rights or obligations to the holders of options and convertible profit participation rights and/or convertible bonds (2013 conditional capital) and by € 1,654,249.00 for the provision of stock options to members of management bodies and employees of Wincor Nixdorf Group, unless preemption rights to the shares of Wincor Nixdorf are exercised (2014 conditional capital), in cash or in company shares. These capital amounts are not directly relevant for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf.

A total of 2,684,455 stock options have been issued under various stock option programs (as of 30 June 2016).

Wincor Nixdorf shares are admitted for trading in the Prime Standard section of the Frankfurt Stock Exchange. The shares were listed in the MDAX through 19 June 2016 and in the SDAX as of 20 June 2016.

According to the statements in the contractual report, Diebold KGaA holds 22,876,760 shares in Wincor Nixdorf directly, for a total share of 69.1% in the company’s capital stock. Wincor Nixdorf holds 3,268,777 shares in itself. Adjusting for the shares owned by the company itself, Diebold KGaA holds 76.7% of the outstanding shares.

The qualified majority stake of Diebold KGaA came to be as a result of a voluntary public takeover offer. On 17 October 2015, Wincor Nixdorf issued an ad-hoc notice announcing that discussions were being held with Diebold Inc., a US competitor in the banking segment, concerning a possible merger, and that a “term sheet” detailing the key aspects of a potential merger had already been agreed upon, calling for e.g. a total consideration in the amount of € 52.50 per share of Wincor Nixdorf, to consist of a cash component as well as shares in Diebold Inc. On 23 November 2015, following the approval of Wincor Nixdorf’s Supervisory Board, a “Business Combination Agreement” was concluded and announced.

Following the voluntary public takeover offer published on 5 February 2016, 22,876,760 shares of Wincor Nixdorf were submitted following the additional acceptance period, which ended on 12 April 2016. By 24 March 2016, Diebold Inc. was able to announce that the minimum acceptance threshold had been exceeded. The voluntary public takeover offer took effect on this basis, but remained subject to the approval of the cartel authorities. On 8 April 2016, Diebold Inc. and Diebold KGaA announced their intent to seek conclusion of a control agreement and possibly a profit and loss absorption agreement following execution of the takeover offer.

-30-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The final approval of the cartel authorities required for execution of the takeover over was issued on 4 August 2016. A closer relationship and integration of services between Diebold Group and Wincor Nixdorf Group than is currently practiced between two independent competitors was not possible to leverage the anticipated synergies before the execution of the takeover offer (15 August 2016) and the conclusion of the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement as intended.

Wincor Nixdorf is the parent company of Wincor Nixdorf Group. It conducts the Group’s business and performs the administrative functions typical of a Group parent company.

-31-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The following significant changes have taken place in the Group in the present Financial Year:

• the spin-off of a business unit (cashless payments) retroactively to 1 October 2015 through the formation of AEVI International GmbH, Paderborn (“AEVI””); the sale of 9.8% of the shares to a strategic partner, which has to date increased its share to 10% by means of a capital increase, the intended sale of a further 5% of the shares to another investor as a consequence of a further capital increase, so that 85% of the shares will remain with Wincor Nixdorf;

• the acquisition of a majority of shares, retroactively to 1 January 2016 (51.0%) in Brussels-based Projective NV (“Projective”), which specializes in program and project management for the financial services sector;

• the sale, subject to the fulfillment of various closing conditions, of a majority of shares in the Chinese subsidiaries to a Chinese partner in order to satisfy regulatory requirements in China with regard to ATMs.

Following the sale of shares in its Chinese holdings, Wincor Nixdorf has 18 domestic and 62 foreign wholly-owned subsidiaries, which it holds directly or indirectly through its wholly-owned subsidiary WINCOR NIXDORF International GmbH, Paderborn, as well as majority interests in three domestic and nine foreign subsidiaries and five additional holdings.

The company is the controlling company in a single-entity tax relationship with 17 (domestic) companies. It is also the controlling company in a single-entity trade and corporate tax relationship with WINCOR NIXDORF International GmbH, which is in turn the controlling company in a single-entity trade and corporate tax relationship with 16 (domestic) companies.

As of 1 October 2015, Wincor Nixdorf Group had a total of € 30.9 million in foreign tax loss carry-forwards. Loss carry-forwards also existed as of 30 September 2015 for the domestic single-entity tax relationship, although the latter have reportedly been fully exhausted through the deduction of taxable income retroactively to 30 September 2015.

-32-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

b) Economic Foundations

ba) Business Activities

The origins of Wincor Nixdorf go back to the computer pioneer Heinz Nixdorf, who built up Nixdorf Computer AG into the fourth-largest computer company in Europe by the mid-1980’s. After being acquired by and integrated into Munich-based Siemens AG, the predecessor company of Wincor Nixdorf was purchased in 1999 by two holding companies and spun off from the Group headed by Siemens AG, and has operated as an independent company ever since. In the year 2004, the company changed its legal form to that of a stock corporation and went public.

Today, Wincor Nixdorf Group is one of the world’s leading providers of IT solutions and services for retail banks and retail companies, with operations in 42 countries through subsidiaries and in more than 90 countries through corporate partners.

The business model aims to help banks and retail companies successfully and efficiently orient their business to the requirements of the digital age and continuously improve their business processes through the introduction of reliable IT solutions.

One of the key tasks of Wincor Nixdorf Group is to help customers integrate digital and stationary sales channels in order to boost sales. To this end, Wincor Nixdorf Group offers a broad range of automated and electronic solutions for banks and retail companies which take into account the major steps involved in modifying business processes. These products are reinforced by product-based services and concepts including the operation of specific industry-specific IT processes by Wincor Nixdorf Group, as well as outsourcing services in which Wincor Nixdorf Group assumes responsibility for the functioning of the systems. These services by Wincor Nixdorf Group help its customers become more efficient and user-friendly while at the same time reducing costs.

Based on the breakdown of business units, the operations of Wincor Nixdorf Group are divided into the “banking” and “retail” segments.

The products and services offered by the banking segment include hardware, software, IT services and consulting services. The core component of the hardware portfolio are automated teller machines (ATMs), cash recycling systems, automated teller safes and transaction terminals. In addition to the software needed to operate this equipment, Wincor Nixdorf also offers banks software which allows them to manage processes over multiple sales channels. Products for postal services companies are also assigned to this segment.

-33-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Through its retail segment, Wincor Nixdorf offers hardware, software, IT services and consulting services to retail companies. Its products in this area relate mainly to the checkout area, including electronic point-of-sale (EPOS) systems and self-checkout (SCO) systems. The software it offers enables complete control over all systems and processes in any store. The products and services of this segment are also designed to meet the needs of gas station operators.

Across all segments, Wincor Nixdorf Group distinguishes between three business types: “hardware,” “software” and “services.” The latter two business types are combined for reporting purposes, under the heading “software/services.” Internally, software/services are further broken down as follows:

• Hardware: the design, production and sale of products like ATMs, cash recyclers, EPOS systems and SCO systems.

• Software: the programming and sale of software packages for the management of bank and retail stores, forming an interface between the operations of the individual branch office and the customer’s core IT processes.

• Professional Services: consulting services in connection with the planning, implementation and operation of the Group’s IT services and software rollouts.

• Product-Related Services: maintenance and support services for the Group’s hardware over the course of the product life cycle.

• Managed Services: management services for hardware and/or IT processes extending beyond just maintenance and support, in order to ensure that they are functioning, as well as managing related processes (e.g. cash management).

• Outsourcing: equipping entire stores and branch offices with their own hardware, operating the associated software using its own resources (e.g. data centers) and managing all related processes.

-34-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The “cashless payment” business is one of the fastest-growing areas of Wincor Nixdorf Group and is operated by AEVI, which is assigned to the retail segment. AEVI aims to integrate payments across all channels and currencies to a single gateway, which will serve as an interface between banks and vendors as well as between vendors and consumers. To this end, a large number of Android-based applications are offered which allow vendors to personalize their devices and customize them to meet the needs of their customers. Completing AEVI’s product range is the “Albert” multi-channel POS tablet, which manages a wide variety of retail processes, from warehouse management and management of back-office processes to handling credit card payments and near-field communication solutions. The device is Android-based and is used by banks and their customers in the hotel and restaurant industry, as well as in retail, in order to improve customer relationships.

Wincor Nixdorf Group currently has 9,643 employees worldwide (30 June 2016). It has production sites in Germany and China. Research and development activities take place above all in Germany, Poland, Singapore and China. However, due to the fact that the company has sold its shares in its Chinese subsidiaries, its operations in China will no longer be included in the consolidated financial statements as of Financial Year 2016/17, but will rather be recognized as “companies held at equity.”

Wincor Nixdorf posted € 2,427 million in revenues in its most recent complete Financial Year (2014/15). 65% of this total came in the banking segment and 35% in the retail segment, and 58% was from software/services and 42% from hardware. In the regional breakdown, the dominant regions are “Europe (not including Germany”) (45%) and Germany (23%). The “Asia/Pacific/Africa” region (“APAC & MEA”) accounts for another 20% and the remaining 12% of revenues are attributable to the “America” (“AMER”) region.

Since the beginning of the second half of Financial Year 2014/15, Wincor Nixdorf has been implementing a restructuring and realignment program (the Delta program). The object of this program, which consists of seven measures, is to expedite the Group’s transformation into a high-margin software and IT service company with an innovative and profitable hardware business. According to the original estimates, the restructuring program will require a total of € 120 million in expenditures, of which two thirds will accrue in 2014/15 and one third in 2015/16, before the program can produce a net positive earnings effect in the amount of € 120 million per year by Financial Year 2017/18.

-35-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

bb) Market and Competition

The extensive explanations provided by the Valuation Expert in the course of his market and competition analysis focus on the key regional markets for the segments of Wincor Nixdorf Group and growth markets with elevated growth potential, insofar as classification is possible based on the market studies used and other sources of information consistent with the breakdown in Wincor Nixdorf’s reporting. Our summary of Wincor Nixdorf’s business activities (see above, Section C.IV.1.ba) and the market and competitive conditions in which it operates dispenses with the accurate presentation of this situation in a SWOT analysis which is explained extensively in the Valuation Opinion.

Macroeconomic Developments

The financial and sovereign debt crisis have resulted in volatile and slumping growth rates in recent years, particularly in Europe. Growth in (real) European gross domestic product (GDP) is expected to improve to 1.8% as of 2017, and GDP growth is expected to hold steady at that level through 2020. This improvement will be caused e.g. by a turnaround in Russia, where growth is expected to improve to 1.5% (2020) following negative GDP growth in 2015 and 2016. In Germany, on the other hand, an improvement was observed as early as 2014 and GDP growth is expected to gradually fall to 1.3% starting in 2017 (1.6%).

The Asia-Pacific (“APAC”) region remains the fastest-growing region, with growth rates of over 5%, although the growth rates observed in recent years (2010: 8.5%) will not be equaled in the forecast period. This trend is being driven largely by the Chinese market, the second-largest economy in the world, where growth continues to drop, and is expected to fall to 6.0% in 2020. The continuing improvement in India, where growth is expected to increase to 7.7% in 2020, will have a positive impact on the results for this region.

In the US, growth is expected to remain stable above 2% for an extended period, although the growth rate should decrease slightly towards the end of the forecast period. The crisis in Brazil, which continues to this day, should be resolved in the forecast period, so that growth rates of 2.0% (2020) can be expected at the end of the period under observation.

Based on the developments presented, global economic growth as a whole should improve from 3.2% today (2016) to 3.8% (2020).

-36-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Development of the Banking Market: Hardware

The banking industry was hard hit by the financial and sovereign debt crisis, particularly in Western Europe and North America, and has yet to fully recover. In addition, the consequences of the planned exit of the United Kingdom from the European Union, if any, are not yet foreseeable. Accordingly, and in light of the other conditions peculiar to the banking industry as well, reducing expenses, and particularly personnel expenses, is of decisive importance for competitiveness and profitability in the banking sector. Competition with “fintech” companies is placing additional pressure on established competitors. As a result, we can expect the continuation of cost optimization programs, including e.g. the closure of bank branches and a resulting decrease in personnel, while on the other hand we will see an increase in the number of ATMs and the introduction of new functions in addition to merely dispensing cash (high-end equipment).

In addition to cost reduction, technological progress, with the progressive integration of wireless communication devices, particularly smart phones, is a key driver of the global growth of IT spending in the banking segment. The introduction of higher security standards for ATMs may also stimulate growth in this category.

The growth in average income, which is expected to continue, and the increasing development of rural areas, is another key growth driver in the hardware business, particularly in Asia.

Due to the trends presented above, global IT spending for ATMs in the retail banking sector is expected to grow at an average rate of 4.1% a year (CAGR) in the period from 2014 to 2019, up to $ 13.1 billion. New installations, an indicator of hardware sales which include both the replacement of obsolete units and the installation of devices at locations where the hardware was not previously in use, are expected to increase at an average rate of 3.5% a year (CAGR, 2015 through 2020), to 558,200 units per year. The installed base, which provides an indication of the current market volume as well as the degree of saturation in the various markets, is expected to increase at an average rate of 5.4% (CAGR, 2014-2020), to 4,116,400 units.

ATM spending in Germany, which is expected to grow at an average rate of 2.5% (CAGR, 2014 through 2019), to $ 720 million, is being driven by replacement acquisitions, as existing units are optimized through the addition of new functions, and therefore reflects the trends described above. The total number of new installations is expected to decrease, so that the number of installed units at the end of the period under observation (2020) is expected to be nearly unchanged from the number today, at 58,900.

-37-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The faster growth in ATM spending in the rest of Europe, where spending growth is expected to average 3.5% (CAGR, 2014-2019), to $ 2.9 billion, is also driven by the trends expected in Germany, reinforced by a rebound effect in Eastern Europe over the course of the crisis in Ukraine. New installations are expected to increase at an average rate of 2.2% (CAGR, 2015- 2020), while the installed base is expected to grow at an average rate of 1.1% (CAGR, 2014- 2020), to 633,300 units.

The AMER region should remain the largest ATM market in the world as of the end of the forecast period, with a market share of 40%. ATM spending is expected to increase at an average rate of 3.9% over the period under examination (CAGR, 2014-2019), to $ 5.3 billion, with by far the largest share of this spending falling to North America ($ 4.7 billion). The growth drivers and trends in that market are similar to those in Germany, with additional growth coming from the introduction of new security standards for payment transactions. In Latin America, new installations are expected to increase substantially, due above all to the expected development in Brazil. On the whole, however, annual new installations in the AMER region are expected to decrease over the period under examination, so that the installed base is expected to show just a slight increase, to 819,800 installed units.

In the APAC & MEA region, ATM spending is expected to grow at an average rate of 5.4% (CAGR, 2014-2019), to $ 4.2 billion. This growth is primarily volume-driven and will be confirmed by the trends cited above. This region’s performance is driven above all by China. However, foreign competitors can benefit only to a limited extent from the growth in China as a result of regulatory requirements. India is also of increasing importance, as is the MEA region. Total new installations in the APAC & MEA region are expected to increase at an average rate of 5.3% (CAGR, 2015-2020), to 384,600 units, for a 69% share of the global market. As a result, the installed base is expected to grow at a rate of 8.8% (CAGR, 2014-2020), to 2,604,300 units.

-38-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Development of the Banking Market: Software/Services

Global spending on IT services in retail banking is expected to grow at an average rate of 4.7% in the period from 2014 to 2019 (CAGR), faster than hardware spending, to $ 157.6 billion. This spending growth is attributable above all to investments in digital and mobile forms of marketing, as retail banks try to market their products and services over all available sales channels (omni-channeling). But customer experience is also becoming an increasingly important aspect given the intense competition in the retail banking market. We are also seeing an increase in IT spending in connection with analyzing customer data to facilitate targeted marketing and improvements in data security.

IT spending in the German retail banking market is expected to increase at an average rate of 3.2% (CAGR, 2014-2019), to $ 8.1 billion, a rate which is below the global average. This below-average growth is attributable to the fact that an adequate supply of hardware already exists, so that demand for software services is accordingly low. Spending on mobile banking (CAGR, 2014- 2019: 5.2%) and online banking (CAGR, 2014-2019: 5.6%) is expected to grow at a faster-than-average pace, as was the case in prior years as well.

In the rest of Europe, IT spending in retail banking in the period under observation is expected to grow at an average rate of 3.8 % (CAGR, 2014-2019), to $ 41.2 billion, which is above the expected growth rate in Germany, but below the global trend.

As in the hardware market, the AMER region is also the largest regional market for IT spending in retail banking, with a global market share of 42%. For the period from 2014 to 2019, IT spending in this region is expected to grow at a rate of 4.8% (CAGR), to $ 66.1 billion. In the US, the largest sub-market in this region, the expected growth is based in particular on the need to comply with new security standards and the efforts to add digital and mobile marketing options. In Latin America, the substantial increase in new installations of ATMs will have a corresponding effect on related software and services.

The highest annual growth rates in IT spending are expected in the APAC & MEA region, with spending expected to grow at an average rate of 5.8% (CAGR, 2014-2019), to $ 42.2 billion. In addition to the expansion of online banking and mobile banking, this growth will be driven primarily by the addition of new ATMs in areas which are currently underdeveloped.

-39-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Development of the retail market: Hardware

The global installed base for EPOS systems is expected to grow at an average rate of 2.6% a year (CAGR) over the period from 2014 to 2020, to 1,989,900 units. However, the expected development varies widely from region to region.

For example, the EPOS market in Germany is in a saturated state. While 11.3% more devices were installed in 2014 than in the year before, it is expected that the installed base, of around 560,000 devices, will not change significantly over the period through 2020. New installations in this area consist primarily of replacement investments.

In the rest of Europe, the number of installed EPOS units is expected to grow at an annual rate of 1.7%, and new installations are expected to increase at a rate of 2.5% (CAGR in each case, 2014-2020). The market growth will be attributed primarily to the expected economic recovery in Central and Eastern Europe, and particularly in Russia, while new installations in the saturated Western European markets are expected to show substantial increases in the years 2016 and 2017 only.

The EPOS market is also on the decline in the AMER region. This is primarily attributable to developments in the US and Canadian markets, where new installations are expected to decrease over the period from 2014 to 2020 at an average rate of 4.2% in the US and 6.9% in Canada. High expected growth rates in Latin America will limit the average decrease in new installations for the AMER region as a whole to 2.1%, and will even result in a slight increase in the installed base, by 0.6% (CAGR in each case, 2014-2020).

In the APAC & MEA region, on the other hand, new installations are expected to increase by 4.8% and the installed base by 6.0% in the forecast period (CAGR in each case, 2014-2020), rates which are well above the global average. These increases will be driven by the substantial growth in consumer spending, which will create new growth opportunities for the retail sector. The largest single market in the region is China, with a share of 50.6% of all new EPOS installations in the region and an average growth rate of 9.7% per year (CAGR, 2014-2020).

Mobile point-of-sales (“mPOS”) solutions will assume increasing importance in all regions. This trend is attributable to increased use of the internet and the increasing popularity of mobile payment systems like PayPal, Apple Pay and Bitcoin. Revenues from mPOS devices are expected to grow at a rate of 9.6% a year over the forecast period, while the sale price per unit will continue to fall.

-40-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The AMER region is the largest market for mPOS devices, with a market share of 51.2% (2014) and an expected average annual growth rate of 10.4 % (CAGR) through 2019. The fastest-growing regional mPOS market is the APAC & MEA region, with an expected annual growth rate of 12.5 % (CAGR, 2014-2020).

Substantial growth in the installed base is also to be expected in the self-checkout (“SCO”) systems sub-market. Global spending in this regard should more than double from 2014 to 2019, to $ 2.19 billion. The most developed market for SCO systems is America.

Development of the retail market: Software/Services

Global IT spending in the retail market amounted to $ 92.0 billion in the year 2015. Of this amount, 32% was spent on hardware, 31% on software and 37% on services. It is expected that spending will increase at an average rate of 3.8% per year through 2020, to $ 111.0 billion. IT spending is expected to increase at an average of 2.3% for hardware, 3.7% for services and 5.5% for software (CAGR in each case, 2015-2020). In other words, we can observe a shift in the retail industry’s IT spending away from hardware and towards software and services, which is the trend in the banking industry as well.

The main drivers of this growth are the creation of innovative and technologically advance sales channels and payment options, the collection and analysis of customer data, automated marketing and the growing demand for mobile applications. For example, it is expected that about 2.6 billion people will own a smart phone by the year 2018, and that they will increasingly do their shopping on these devices.

The growth forecast for the Europe-Middle-East-Africa (“EMEA”) region is 2.9% (CAGR, 2015-2020), below the global trend, because many e-commerce retailers still have security concerns in connection with the use of cloud infrastructure. In the long run, however, there will be strong growth in online sales.

-41-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

America is the largest market for IT spending in the retail industry, with a market share of 43.2% (2015). Spending is expected to continue to grow at an average rate of 4.2% in the period through 2020 (CAGR). IT investments in this area are directed towards the realization of mobile purchases and payment systems, data security, the use of social networks and, increasingly, offering customers the option of comparing prices.

The highest growth rate is expected in the APAC region, with a rate of 4.6% (CAGR, 2015-2020). The growth is attributable to the increase in average income and the resulting growth in the importance of online retailers. Other than China, the highest growth potential can be found in India.

Competition situation

Wincor Nixdorf is exposed to intense competitive pressure on a global stage. Its products and services face competition from larger competitors, in some cases, with regard to price and quality, the time needed for the development and launch of new innovations and customer service. In addition to the dual vendor strategy pursued by many customers, the competition situation of the market operators is determined by the degree to which they are established in their respective home regions.

Using the number of installed ATMs as the standard for measuring competitive conditions in the retail banking customer sector, Wincor Nixdorf’s market share of 16.5% (2014) is far lower than that of the global market leader, NCR Corporation of Duluth, Georgia (“NCR”), but on par with the second-place provider, Diebold Inc. Together, these three market leaders account for a market share of more than 60% with regard to products and services for retail banks in connection with ATMs.

The size of the two market leaders should be seen in light of the size of their home market, America, while Wincor Nixdorf is the market leader in the much smaller European market. Established competitors are coming under increasing pressure from Asian competitors, while providers of ATMs and related services in the software and services submarket also face competition from consulting firms and manufacturers of banking software.

Wincor Nixdorf’s customers presently include 21 of the world’s 25 leading banks. The latter are facing pressure to consolidate, which in turn affects competition among providers.

-42-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Using new installations of EPOS systems as a standard for competition in the retail customer sector, Wincor Nixdorf’s market share is 8.2% (2014), much smaller than that of the global market leader, the Tokyo-based Toshiba Tec Corporation. Wincor Nixdorf takes fourth place in this market, which is somewhat more fragmented. With regard to deliveries of SCO systems, however, Wincor Nixdorf is the second-largest manufacturer with a market share of 16%, behind only NCR, which dominates this product segment with a market share of 64%, but which has recently been losing market share to Wincor Nixdorf.

In the software and services sub-market, which is much more fragmented, Wincor Nixdorf also faces competition from companies whose operations do not center upon the production and supply of hardware, and can therefore offer other core competencies as well.

Wincor Nixdorf’s customers presently include 16 of the 25 highest-revenue retailers. Due to the massive scale of their orders, global retail companies possess a market power which operates to the detriment of hardware providers, as well as providers of software and services.

The future competitive situation in the cashless payments business is hard to predict because this segment is still relatively new and since it can be expected to change as new competitors enter the scene.

bc) Financial, Earnings and Liquidity Position

The Valuation Expert performs an analysis of the financial, earnings and liquidity position of Wincor Nixdorf Group based on the audited and issued with an unqualified auditor’s opinion consolidated financial statements for Financial Years 2012/13 through 2014/15.

The Valuation Expert accurately summarizes his extensive explanations of the company’s financial and liquidity position as follows:

• The ratio of current to non-current assets has remained largely constant, except for the fluctuation on 30 September 2014 due to the increase in current trade receivables.

• The equity ratio has remained above 25% throughout, but was down until the close of the period under consideration due to the unfavorable earnings trend.

• There has been a slight shift from non-current to current liabilities due to the share of current financial liabilities, current trade payables and current provisions.

-43-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The Valuation Expert’s extensive explanations with regard to the earnings position can be summarized as follows:

• Total revenues were stagnant (2013/14) and subsequently decreased by 1.7%, to € 2,427 million (2014/15), due to worsening conditions in key future markets, slumping investments by retail banks and companies in key industrialized countries, falling hardware prices and the absence of new growth as a result of delays in the implementation of acquisition projects.

• The revenue split is shifting in favor of the AMER and APAC & MEA regions, where total revenues are on the rise, at the expense of Europe (not including Germany) and Germany, where total revenues are down, due above all to developments in Eastern Europe (particularly the Crimean crisis), even though revenues in Germany have been up due to various a solid order situation in the retail segment.

• The revenue split is shifting in favor of the retail segment due to major projects with gas station companies and checkout software, at the expense of the banking segment, due above all to the effect of exchange rates, particularly in connection with the geopolitical Ukraine conflict with Russia.

• There has been a clear shift in the business split due to the steady growth in revenues from software/services and the continuous decrease in hardware revenues.

• Gross margin has decreased significantly, from 22.0% to 17.9%, due to scale effects, exchange rate losses and restructuring costs.

• The level of research and development expenses has remained largely constant.

• Selling and administrative expenses decreased as a result of extraordinary income from the sale of a property (2013/14) and subsequently increased due to the cost of the Delta restructuring program (2014/15)

• There was a net improvement in EBITA (up € 23 million, to € 155 million) and EBITA margin (from 5.3%, to 6.3%) in Financial Year 2013/14, followed by slumps in EBIT (down € 133 million, to € 22 million) and EBITA margin (to 0.9%) in Financial Year 2014/15.

-44-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

• The share in earnings of Wincor Nixdorf shareholders improved, on balance, from € 87 million (2012/13) to € 101 million (2013/14), before dropping to € 6 million (2014/15)

bd) Adjustment of the Earnings Position

In order to achieve better comparability between forecasts and historical results, it is a typical for valuation practitioners to analyze historical results with regard to circumstances of a unique and non-recurring nature, and which involve extraordinary items or items relating to other periods. It may also be expedient to make “pro forma” adjustments to account for the fact that the Valuation Object has changed as a result of restructuring measures, acquisitions and the sale of companies and business units.

The Valuation Expert made adjustments of the former category for the historical comparison period (Financial Years 2012/13 to 2014/15) to the items of the income statement through EBITA. We deem an adjustment to be appropriate up to the EBITA line of the income statement because the subsequent items of the income statement do not lend themselves to historical comparison. The adjustments relate to just a small number of circumstances. They are broken down in the Valuation Opinion in a table showing the individual items of the income statement. They pertain to a restructuring program (“One-Wincor”) which was executed in the past (2012/13), the sale of a property in Singapore (2013/14) and the Delta restructuring program, which was launched in Financial Year 2014/15 and will remain in effect into the Detailed Forecast Period (2014/15).

We were able to verify these adjustments based on audit reports and supplementary explanations by the Valuation Expert and the company. In the course of our audit, we did not identify any other material circumstances requiring adjustments to historical earnings, with regard to adjustments of the first category. Adjustments of the second category were not necessary because the Valuation Object did not undergo material structural change in the historical period under observation.

The adjustments of these one-time effects had the effect of smoothing the EBITA figures for the historical period under observation relative to the reported data.

-45-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

This has the effect of lessening the slump in gross margin in Financial Year 2014/15 relative to its presentation in the company’s annual reports (from 22.0% to 17.9%). The adjusted gross margin (20.1%) is therefore down just 2.4% from the margin for Financial Year 2013/14. This decrease was largely due to the company’s failure to achieve scale effects.

The adjusted EBITA margin shows a steady downtrend (from 6.1% to 5.5% to 4.2%), which the launch of the Delta restructuring program was meant to counteract.

In our view, adjusted EBITA (2012/13: € 152 million – 2013/14: € 135 million – 2014/15: € 102 million) provides a good basis for checking the plausibility of the forecast estimates.

c) Structure and Definition of the Valuation Object

The Valuation Object is correctly identified as Wincor Nixdorf, including its subsidiaries and minority holdings.

Valuations of corporate groups can be performed using various methods, all of which yield identical results if applied properly.

One option is to determine the earnings of each Group company separately, starting at the lowest level, and then to incorporate these earnings into the investment results of the relevant holding company. In this method, separate values are not determined for each individual company.

Another possibility is to determine the value of each company separately. The value of the Group parent company is then determined by adding together these individual values, with due regard for the percentage of ownership (“sum of the parts”).

Finally, it is possible to perform a simultaneous valuation by adding together and consolidating the individual earnings components. In this method, the value contribution of the individual companies cannot be ascertained since the consolidation measures cannot be directly attributed to the individual companies.

One of these methods is to be selected based on the structure or purpose of the underlying forecasts, and based on whether a presentation of individual values is sensible or necessary.

-46-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In the present case, operations are planned and managed primarily on the basis of information concerning segments (customer segments primarily, regional segments on a secondary basis) and business types, as well as on the Group level. Moreover, it is not necessary to determine the valuations of individual subsidiaries and intermediate levels (countries, business units, segments) in this case.

Consistent with the structure of the forecast presented by the company, the Valuation Expert performed a simultaneous valuation at the Group level, deriving the earnings value from the Group forecast. The Valuation Expert’s analyses also take into account business units and segments. Earnings contributions from unconsolidated companies are included in the forecast. In the company’s annual reports, the earnings of joint ventures and associated companies are recognized at equity in EBITA. For the purposes of the forecast, these earnings were netted out with marketing and administrative expenses, resulting in a net decrease in that item.

We deem this mode of procedure to be expedient for the reasons mentioned above.

By reconciling the data, we have assured ourselves that the value of all subsidiaries and holdings has been fully taken into account in the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf.

In summary, we deem the Valuation Expert’s mode of procedure in structuring and defining the Valuation Object Wincor Nixdorf to be appropriate.

2. Valuation Date

The Valuation Date, in terms of the “informational delineation function” of the valuation date, is the date of the Wincor Nixdorf GM at which the resolution is to be adopted, i.e. 26 September 2016. With regard to the adequacy of the cash compensation, this is directly evident from § 305(3) Sentence 2 of the Stock Corporation Act, which states that the company’s circumstances at the time the resolution is adopted are to be taken into account. Furthermore, it is widely acknowledged that this legal valuation date also marks the date on which the adequate cash compansation is to be determined, since there is no provision to this effect in the statute (Hüttemann/Meyer in Fleischer/Hüttemann (ed.), Rechtshandbuch Unternehmensbewertung, 2015, § 12 Marginal No. 33).

-47-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The Valuation Expert chose 1 October 2015 as the Technical Valuation Date, in terms of the “value delineation function” of the valuation date. In doing so, he accounted for the fact that the earnings for Financial Year 2015/16 which were posted prior to 26 September 2016 cannot be defined and ascertained with adequate certainty, due to the fact that the company’s accounting and forecasts are performed in annual periods, and had yet to be credited to the minority shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf at the time the resolution was adopted.

Within the context of the valuation, it is assumed for the sake of simplicity that results for each year will be evenly distributed over the course of the year, that retained earnings will accrue at mid-year in each case and that dividends will be paid four months after the reporting date in each case, i.e. at a time when general meetings are typically held and dividends adopted.

The value contributions of distributions (dividends) and retained earnings are discounted to the legal valuation date (26 September 2016) using the period-specific discount rate, diminished by the growth rate in the perpetual annuity.

We deem the mode of procedure described above to be appropriate, in summary. Furthermore, the method was executed in a mathematically accurate fashion.

3. Valuation Method

The valuation was performed using the earnings value method set down in the IDW S1 standard. Ascertaining the value of future earnings, and the earnings value method as a possible method for its determination is the valid and accepted method for the performance of valuations for companies whose going concern value exceeds their liquidation value, according to the prevailing view in business administration theory and in the auditing profession. The earnings value method is also accepted as standard practice by the courts.

Other valuation methods were not applied in the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf. Detailed derivation and presentation of the liquidation value were dispensed with in the context of the Valuation Opinion. The Valuation Expert justifies this mode of procedure based on the results of a cursory review. We have verified this consideration and likewise deem the development of liquidation value to be unnecessary (see C.IV.11 in this regard).

-48-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

A valuation was performed using multipliers based on capital market data in order to check the plausibility of the valuation results. We have examined this calculation and added considerations with regard to the comparison with pre-acquisition prices (see Section C.IV.10 in this regard).

The Valuation Expert has examined whether the share price of Wincor Nixdorf shares represents the lower limit for the cash compensation, which is generally derived from the per share valuation. We have verified his findings (see Section C.IV.12 in this regard).

In line with the prevailing view, the Valuation Expert calculated earnings value as an objectified value, i.e. based on the perspective of a typical shareholder. It was assumed that this typical shareholder is a natural person with an unlimited domestic tax liability and who holds only a small number of shares and therefore is not in a position to exercise control over the company’s finances or operations.

The determination of objectified value is also to be performed in such a way that synergy effects which can arise only after conclusion of the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement (“real synergy effects”) are not taken into consideration while synergy effects which can arise even without that measure (“pseudo synergy effects”), and which are part of a corporate concept which is documented as of the Valuation Date, are taken into account. In the present case, the expected synergies arising from the business combination between Wincor Nixdorf and Diebold Inc. were ascertained and recognized in part, according to the above principles (see Section C.IV.4.d in this regard).

We deem the decision to use the earnings value method as described above in order to ascertain the value of Wincor Nixdorf to be appropriate and unobjectionable.

4. Derivation of Net Cash Flows

a) Analysis of Forecast Accuracy

The Valuation Expert analyzed the forecasting accuracy for key financial indicators (revenues per segment, expenses up to EBITA, EBITA per segment and the margins derived from these figures).

-49-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

To this end, he calculated the deviations between estimates and actual data of the first forecast year (budget) for Financial Years 2012/13 through 2014/15 and analyzed the causes of any deviations. Because Financial Year 2015/16 was not yet over at the time of the valuation and the audit, but results for that year can presumably be projected with sufficient accuracy, the Valuation Expert supplemented this analysis with a “Plan Forecast Analysis.”

We have comprehended the detailed analysis of the Valuation Expert.

In summary, the Valuation Expert finds that the variation in the revenues are attributable in particular to the effects of the financial and debt crisis and the unexpectedly difficult market environment above all in various emerging markets. Based on the fixed cost nature of key expense items and the special expenses from the restructuring programs, EBITA could not be reached as forecast, above all in Financial Year 2014/15. For Financial Year 2015/16, the forecast revenue is currently being slightly exceeded with sharp upward variation in the forecast EBITA.

Despite the variations in the forecast and actual figures, the Valuation Expert deems the forecast to be suitable for purposes of the business valuation, since the variations are largely based on unexpected economic developments.

We deem the variation detected to be comparatively below-average and, in those cases where it is significant, to be sufficiently well explained by one-time effects and unforeseeable developments. Moreover, there are no reasons to assume a systematic over- or underestimation of the future developments or other reasons to call the forecasts as a whole in to question. We therefore share the opinion of the Valuation Expert that the forecast of Wincor Nixdorf is suitable for purposes of the business valuation.

b) Structure of the Forecast, Forecasting Process and Audit Procedure

The valuation of Wincor Nixdorf assumes in conformance with the principles in IDW S 1 an unlimited going concern for the Wincor Nixdorf Group. Because an endless period is not possible for firm forecasting, a distinction must be made between the Detailed Forecast Period and the Phase of the perpetual annuity.

-50-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The Detailed Forecast Period is determined by the forecast of the Company (as of September 2015) encompassing the years 2015/16 to 2017/2018. Because the first year of the forecast (budget year) was already well underway as of the valuation date, the Company replaced its original forecast (results from the budget year) with an update (forecast; as of July 2016). This was based on the actual results as of 30 June 2016, which were projected to the results anticipated as of 30 September 2016 for Financial Year 2015/16 as a whole.

The new information taken into account in the forecast relates in particular to the effects from the deconsolidation of the Chinese subsidiaries based on the sale of the majority of the shares in a Chinese strategic investor, though the legal transfer has not yet taken place, because it has not yet been approved by the state authorities. Moreover, the forecast contains further changes at subsidiaries (see Section C.IV.1a) and an improvement in operative results from unexpectedly positive revenue growth (particularly in the hardware segment) and a lower charge to earnings through restructuring expenses from the Delta Program.

The forecast (Stand September 2015) likewise does not take into account any effects that relate to the merger of the Company with Diebold Inc. and the takeover of a qualified majority by Diebold Inc. and have become increasingly concrete in the course of Financial Year 2015/16. The forecast contains the transaction costs incurred in this connection at Wincor Nixdorf.

As of the valuation date, a so-called de facto group relation exists between Wincor Nixdorf and Diebold Inc. in which synergy effects can be and are being realized even without the valid DPLA within the framework of the legal restrictions to be observed by the Management Board of Wincor Nixdorf. The contractual parties have implemented working groups that have identified the anticipated synergy effects, classified them according to real and pseudo synergies and estimated the anticipated effect for each contractual party. The (updated) forecast of the Company has been supplemented for valuation purposes by the Company’s own forecast of the pseudo synergy effects to be considered.

The balance sheet is not a focus of the forecasts of Wincor Nixdorf. Consequently, it is only prepared for the budget year and then updated using simplified assumptions for the two further forecast years. The Company has adjusted the forecast balance sheet for 2015/16 in the forecast. The Valuation Expert has updated this for the two further forecast years based on

-51-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

information from the Company provided up to the start of August. Based on the balance sheets updated and further developed in this fashion, the Valuation Expert has, with due regard to the information on the distribution policy additional issued by the Company’s management, computed financial requirements and independently recalculated the interest result and finally the corporate taxes.

The Company’s forecast has been prepared in accordance with the accounting of Wincor Nixdorf pursuant to IFRS principles.

The consolidated forecast is based on the detailed forecast for financial figures from the forecasting units for the first year of the forecast (budget) and a simplified update of the financial figures for the two ensuing years. The financial results from the previous year’s forecast are updated monthly on a rolling basis in order to be able to detect any forecast variation early on.

The forecast financial figures include revenues, costs of sales, research and development costs, marketing and administrative costs, EBITA and working capital. At a group level, the financial figures are aggregated by levels in accordance with the reporting (interim) units up to the EBITA and then supplemented by forecasts for the interest result, taxes and balance sheet.

The process of creating the forecast begins every year in April by creating top-down goals (or “hurdles”) within the framework of a so-called “hurdle process” for key financial figures for the group and the sales units (segments and types of businesses). These hurdles are broken down by the forecasting units of the group (legal entities, regions, etc.). There is then a communication phase between the managers of the forecasting units and the managers of the segments and business units. By mid-July, the forecasting units compute the detailed forecasts in the forecasting system (bottom-up). These data are subjected to a review by the managers of the segments and sales units and the aggregate goals for these organizational units are compared.

The approval of the Supervisory Board is obtained for the budget of the first forecast year. The Supervisory Board moreover receives the forecast for the following years for his information. After the Management and Supervisory Boards have approved the consolidated budget, the budget is signed by management at the group level, the sales units and the management of the forecasting units. This agreement also forms the basis for the variable income of the management of each organizational unit.

-52-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In the present case, the Supervisory Board approved the 2015/16 budget on 23 September 2015 and took note of the forecast for the two following years (2016/17 und 2017/18). On 27 July 2016, the Supervisory Board also took note of the 2015/16 forecast and the adjustment of the forecast for the following years based on the effects from the partial sale of the Chinese business activities.

The assumptions and premises underlying the forecast and the resulting conclusions about the plausibility of the forecast were analyzed by the Valuation Expert in detail. We satisfied ourselves by participating in material discussions between the Valuation Expert and the persons in charge of the forecasts at Wincor Nixdorf that the Valuation Expert did not assume the forecasts of the Company without checking them, but instead sufficiently verified their plausibility.

The Valuation Expert integrated the updates and additions from the initial forecast into its valuation model and supplemented these by including the financial requirements in dialogue with the Company. The Valuation Expert calculated the financial result and the corporate taxes on this basis. The Valuation Expert derived the perpetual result using a technical transitional year in which the full (pseudo) synergy effects initially anticipated as of 2018/19 are taken into account.

Within the framework of our audit, we analyzed in detail the initial forecast of the Company and its updates, the additions and changes made by the Valuation Expert in consultation with the Company, the interest result and corporate taxes, which were items technically modified for purposes of the valuation, and the Expert’s calculations of the perpetual results. In addition to our analyses based on the historical figures, the forecast documents and market-related information and in order to gain an understanding of the bases of the forecast, we conducted meetings with the persons in charge of forecasting at Wincor Nixdorf and representatives of the Valuation Expert on site at the offices of Wincor Nixdorf and during numerous telephone conversations and conference calls.

-53-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

We thereby examined whether the forecast used and the perpetual annuity derived therefrom stood in a plausible relation to the historical figures and the figures from the respective financial years (results, comparative data) and whether the forecast data, including the perpetual results, properly reflect the expected development of Wincor Nixdorf with due regard to expected future market conditions.

-54-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

c) EBITA Forecast for Wincor Nixdorf

ca) Group Overview (Including one-time Effects)

The EBITA forecast for Financial Years 2015/16 to 2017/18 (before and after one-time effects) results as follows compared to the most recently completed Financial Year 2014/15 (adjusted) and supplemented by the group-level financial indicators:

Wincor Nixdorf Group	Actual (adjusted)			FC			Estimated						CAGR
EBITA forecast	2014/15			2015/16			2016/17			2017/18			14/15-17/18
	€ million			€ million			€ million			€ million
Banking		1.582			1.550			1.580			1.660			1,6	%
Retail		845			1.030			1.040			1.105			9,4	%
Revenues		2.427			2.580			2.620			2.765			4,4	%
Banking		-1.270			-1.164			-1.195			-1.250			-0,5	%
Retail		-668			-796			-798			-838			7,9	%
Cost of sales		-1.938			-1.960			-1.993			-2.088			2,5	%
Gross profit from revenue		489			620			627			677			11,5	%
Research and development costs		-86			-100			-108			-115			10,2	%
Selling and administrative expenses		-301			-330			-329			-342			4,3	%
EBITA (adjusted)		102			190			190			220			29,2	%
Restructuring expenses		-80			-20			—			—			n.a.
Other one-time effects		—			25			—			—			n.a.
EBITA (including one-time effects before transaction costs)		22			195			190			220			115,4	%
Transaction costs, Diebold business combination agreement		—			-50			—			—			n.a.
EBITA (incl. one-time effects and transaction costs)		22			145			190			220			115,4	%
Financial Indicators														Ø 15/16-17/18
EBITDA (in € million)		76			256			261			302			n.a.
EBITDA margin		3,1	%		9,9	%		10,0	%		10,9	%		10,3	%
Depreciation rate		2,2	%		2,4	%		2,7	%		3,0	%		2,7	%
EBITA margin (reported)		0,9	%		7,6	%		7,3	%		8,0	%		7,6	%
EBITA margin (adjusted)		4,2	%		7,4	%		7,3	%		8,0	%		7,5	%
Revenue growth		n.a.			6,3	%		1,6	%		5,5	%		4,5	%
Gross margin, banking		19,7	%		24,9	%		24,4	%		24,7	%		24,7	%
Gross margin, retail		20,9	%		22,7	%		23,3	%		24,2	%		23,4	%
Gross margin, Group		20,1	%		24,0	%		23,9	%		24,5	%		24,1	%
Research and development cost ratio		3,5	%		3,9	%		4,1	%		4,2	%		4,1	%
Selling and administrative expense ratio		12,4	%		12,8	%		12,6	%		12,4	%		12,6	%

-55-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

On the whole, the company expects that revenues will bounce back from the recent unsatisfactory results to post an average growth of 4.4% per year. The current forecast calls for growth above this level, so that a slowdown in growth is to be expected in the second forecast year. The company’s organic growth will be accompanied over the forecast period by inorganic growth through targeted acquisitions of promising fast-growing and niche companies.

Now that the retail segment has been able to compensate in the current financial year for its drop in the previous year according to the projections, and the banking segment has had to withstand in the current financial year a decrease in revenue as a result of the termination of two loss-generating contracts in the US, the two segments are now developing nearly identically, as was expected. At the end of the forecast horizon, revenue should split along the primary segments 60% (Banking) to 40% (Retail).

With minor fluctuations in the revenue split (after the third segmentation) in the other regions, the Company anticipates based on recovery effects in eastern Europe above-average growth in Europe (not including Germany). The APAC & MEA region is losing potential revenue through the majority sale of the Chinese companies.

The forecast also reflects the company’s stated strategy of concentrating growth in the higher-margin software and services business.

The company posted an unsatisfactory gross margin last year, prompting the launch of a restructuring program, but in the forecast period the margin is expected to climb to a level which was not seen at any time in the historical period under examination (as of 2012/13). Contrary to original estimates, the margin is now expected to nearly equal the desired level as early as the current financial year.

Research and development activities are of essential importance for Wincor Nixdorf, as a technology company, so that reductions in this category of spending as part of the restructuring program will be moderate and carried out with great care. Since the company plans to increase the revenue share of software and services, it expects costs to increase significantly in this area, resulting in a steady increase in the research and development cost ratio. Selling and administrative expenses will run largely parallel to revenues throughout the period under observation.

-56-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

(Adjusted) EBITA should nearly double in the current year relative to the crisis-ridden 2014/15, and should climb to € 220 million through the end of the forecast period. With the increasing share of higher-margin products, the overall margin is expected to increase to 8.0%, a level which was not even approached in the historical period under observation.

Results for the current year (2015/16) are affected by one-time effects. Contrary to expectations (€ 40million), it was recently discovered that the final expenses for the Delta restructuring program will amount to just € 20 million. Results this year will also be boosted by structural effects from income in connection with the purchase (€ 10 million) and sale (€ 15 million) of shares in subsidiaries. The business combination agreement which has been concluded with Diebold Inc. is expected to trigger € 50 million in expenditures, primarily consisting of external consulting costs, “retention fees” and (dys-) synergies from the merger.

Depreciation of property, plant and equipment, amortization of licenses and allowances on reparable spare parts that are contained in the functional costs increase from € 54 million (2014/15) to € 82 million (2017/18), representing an increase in the depreciation rate from 2.2% to 3.0%. Accordingly, depreciation and amortization are slightly higher than investments (not including investments in inorganic growth).

-57-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

cb) Banking Segment

Expected EBITA for Financial Years 2015/16 through 2017/18 is derived by comparison with the most recently completed Financial Year, 2014/15 (adjusted), supplemented by financial indicators for the Banking segment as follows:

Wincor Nixdorf: Banking segment	Actual (reported)			FC			Estimated						CAGR
EBITA forecast	2014/15			2015/16			2016/17			2017/18			14/15-17/ 18
	€ million.			€ million.			€ million.			€ million.			%
Hardware		626			618			613			608			-1.0	%
Software/Services		956			932			967			1,052			3.2	%
Revenue		1,582			1,550			1,580			1,660			1.6	%
Hardware		-540			-482			-496			-497			-2.7	%
Software/Services		-730			-682			-699			-753			1.0	%
Cost of sales		-1,270			-1,164			-1,195			-1,250			-0.5	%
Gross profit from revenue		312			386			385			410			9.5	%
Research and development costs		-53			-59			-59			-62			5.4	%
Selling and administrative expenses		-194			-192			-190			-199			0.9	%
EBITA (adjusted)		65			135			136			149			31.9	%
Financial indicators														Ø 15/16-17/18
Revenue growth, Hardware		n.a.			-1.3	%		-0.8	%		-0.8	%		-1.0	%
Revenue growth Software/Services		n.a.			-2.5	%		3.8	%		8.8	%		3.3	%
Hardware share		39.6	%		39.9	%		38.8	%		36.6	%		38.7	%
Software/Services share		60.4	%		60.1	%		61.2	%		63.4	%		61.3	%
Gross margin, Hardware		13.7	%		22.0	%		19.1	%		18.3	%		18.3	%
Gross margin, Software/Services		23.6	%		26.8	%		27.8	%		28.4	%		26.7	%
Research and development costs ratio		3.4	%		3.8	%		3.7	%		3.7	%		3.7	%
Selling and administrative expenses ratio		12.3	%		12.4	%		12.0	%		12.0	%		12.2	%
EBITA margin (adjusted)		4.1	%		8.7	%		8.6	%		9.0	%		7.6	%

Revenue

The development of revenue in the banking segment shows clear growth of 3.2% per year in software and services and a decrease of 1.0% in hardware. Accordingly, the software/services shares in banking segment revenues has increased from 60% (2014/15) to 63% (2017/18).

The decrease in hardware revenues is attributable both to price pressure and to a stagnation in the installed base, particularly in core European markets. The drop in prices was made up only in part by improvements to the devices in the form of additional functions. Despite the decrease in revenues, the hardware business will continue to be of strategic importance for the company in the future, as the contacts and expertise from the hardware business are indispensable for the marketing of software and services.

-58-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Revenues in the software/services business are expected to be down 2.5% this year due to the termination of two unprofitable service agreements with major US banks (total volume: € 50 million), despite compensatory effects in other regions and businesses. In the ensuing period, however, revenues in this business should grow at a strong pace, by 3.8% in 2016/17 and 8.8% in 2017/18. This growth will be driven by two sub-businesses in particular: software and professional services and managed services and outsourcing. In the product-related services sub-business, on the other hand, which is heavily dependent on the hardware business, only slight revenue growth is expected.

In the software and professional services sub-segment, Wincor Nixdorf hopes to profit from increased IT spending by retail banks for the digitization of sales and the proliferation of multi-channel strategies. In the managed services sub-segment, Wincor Nixdorf manages hardware and/or IT processes, as well as related processes like cash management. Wincor Nixdorf expects to win more projects in this area, such as cash management, monitoring and expanded help desk services.

In terms of regions, Germany is the company’s largest single market, with a 25% of share global revenues (2014/15). However, consistent with the general stagnation in German market conditions, revenues in the company’s home market are expected to decrease at an average rate of 1.5% per year, so that Germany’s revenue share will drop to 23% in the forecast period.

However, revenues in Europe (not including Germany) are expected to grow at a rate of 5.6% per year, which can be attributed above all to the expected consolidation of the banking market and the intention of banks to focus on new issues, such as digitization, branch transformation and “assisted self-service” (self-service, supplemented where necessary by advice from bank employees). These activities will benefit the software/services business more than the hardware business. The region’s revenue share will climb from 37% (2014/15) to 42% (2017/18).

-59-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

22% of revenues in the banking segment in Financial Year 2014/15 were earned in the APAC & MEA region. These revenues are expected to decrease by €58 million in Financial Year 2015/16, to €290 million, as a hardware rollout in Australia came to an end. Revenues in that region should bounce back in the next two years, consistent with the very strong market forecasts, even though the revenues of the Chinese companies will no longer be included due to their deconsolidation.

Only 16% of revenues in the banking segment in Financial Year 2014/15 were earned in the AMER region. Revenues are expected to decrease further in the North American banking business in particular since the company’s two largest competitors, Diebold Inc. and NCR, have roots in that region and have access to strong business relationships, particularly with well-capitalized regional banks. On the other hand, solid growth is expected in Latin America, particularly in Brazil and Mexico.

Operating Expenses/EBITA

Due to high price pressure in the hardware business, Wincor Nixdorf’s gross margin in Financial Year 2014/15 was 13.7% in the hardware business, much lower than in software and services. Gross margin is expected to increase sharply in Financial Year 2015/16, to 22.0%. This is due above all to the Delta program, which has resulted in reduced expenses much earlier than expected. Even if this margin is not sustainable because of the price pressure, it is expected that margins can be held at a satisfactory level by standardizing production processes and reducing the vertical range of manufacture.

The already high gross margin of 23.6% in software/services (2014/15) should continue to improve, to 28.4% (2017/18). Aside from the Delta program, this improvement can be attributed above all to the focus on the high-margin software and professional services business.

Due above all to the reduction in expenses because of the Delta program, EBITA in the banking segment are currently expected to increase from € 65 million (2014/15) to € 135 million (2015/16). The focus on the high-margin software and services business should make up for the decrease in revenues and earnings in the hardware business margin, so that EBITA will climb to € 149 million (2017/18).

-60-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

cc) Retail Segment

Expected EBITA for Financial Years 2015/16 through 2017/18 is derived by comparison with the most recently completed Financial Year, 2014/15 (adjusted), supplemented by financial indicators for the retail segment as follows:

Wincor Nixdorf: Retail segment	Actual (reported)			FC			Estimated						CAGR
EBITA forecast	2014/15			2015/16			2016/17			2017/18			14/15-17/ 18
	€ million.			€ million.			€ million.			€ million.			%
Hardware		389			497			444			457			5.5	%
Software/services		456			533			596			648			12.4	%
Revenue		845			1,030			1,040			1,105			9.4	%
Hardware		-304			-376			-342			-355			5.3	%
Software/Services		-364			-420			-456			-483			9.9	%
Cost of sales		-668			-796			-798			-838			7.9	%
Gross profit from revenue		177			234			242			267			14.7	%
Research and development costs		-33			-41			-49			-53			17.1	%
Selling and administrative expenses		-107			-138			-139			-143			10.1	%
EBITA (adjusted)		37			55			54			71			24.3	%
Financial indicators														Ø 15/16-17/18
Revenue growth, Hardware		n.a.			27.8	%		-10.7	%		2.9	%		6.7	%
Revenue growth Software/Services		n.a.			16.9	%		11.8	%		8.7	%		12.5	%
Hardware share		46.0	%		48.3	%		42.7	%		41.4	%		44.6	%
Software/Services share		54,0	%		51.7	%		57.3	%		58.6	%		55.4	%
Gross margin, Hardware		21.9	%		24.3	%		23.0	%		22.3	%		22.9	%
Gross margin, Software/Services		20.2	%		21.2	%		23.5	%		25.5	%		22.6	%
Research and development costs ratio		3.9	%		4.0	%		4.7	%		4.8	%		4.3	%
Selling and administrative expenses ratio		12.7	%		13.4	%		13.4	%		12.9	%		13.1	%
EBITA margin (adjusted)		4.4	%		5.3	%		5.2	%		6.4	%		5.3	%

Revenue

Revenues were down 6.4% in Financial Year 2014/15, due in particular to weaker investments by major European companies and the postponement of rollout dates, especially for hardware products, but Wincor Nixdorf expects to outperform the market by a substantial growth in the forecast period (9.4% per year). If we were to take into account the easy comparison (2014/15) and choose a more suitable starting point (2013/14), the growth rate would decrease to 5.2% per year. Even this growth rate would be classified as above-average relative to the market as a whole.

This strong growth is attributable to the software/services business. It results above all from inorganic growth, such as the acquisition of Brink’s Nederland B.V., based in Houten in the Netherlands (“Brink’s”), which has already been realized, as well as the strong growth of AEVI (annualized growth rate of 45% since 2015/16).

-61-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The trend which has been observed in the past, with revenues shifting away from hardware (down from 46% to 41%) and towards software/services, is expected to continue, boosted by the disproportionate growth of global IT spending for software/services. Th strategic shift towards higher-margin software/service products (gross margin up to 25.5%) is explained above all by the continuing price decline of hardware components. The company’s own forecast of hardware quantities, relative to its hardware revenue forecast, illustrates this price drop, which the company is trying to compensate for with higher-quality product designs.

In addition, competitive advantages can be derived from the heterogeneous market landscape and the ability to meet individual customer needs with regard to software offerings, as well as the provisions of global software and services, and Wincor Nixdorf expects them to result in higher margins. Such advantages are reportedly already evident in the growing gas station business (segment revenue share: 8-10%), which is generating higher margins due to the right mix of hardware and software/service products.

The revenue trend for some hardware products should be seen in light of unique country-specific circumstances which comprise a globally diversified product portfolio. While growth potential is expected for EPOS, Wincor Nixdorf’s most important product system, in emerging markets and some European countries, revenues from these products will be down in more developed industrialized countries due to market saturation. On the other hand, the SCO, mPOS and reverse vending systems product systems are expected to show high growth potential particularly in more developed industrialized economies

The development of revenues for software/service products is characterized by a decreasing share for product-related services (down by 10% from 2014/15 to 2017/18) and the strong growth in professional services and managed services (up 18% and 23% per year respectively), which has been supported by inorganic growth.

With a revenue share of almost 80% (2014/15), the Germany and Europe (not including Germany) regions represent the largest markets for Wincor Nixdorf, which has established itself as the market leader in those regions. Both regions show strong growth, driven above all by strong demand for software solutions.

-62-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

It is striking that revenues are expected to fall by 3.1% a year in the APAC & MEA region, which is generally showing strong growth. This is attributable to the planned sale of the majority shareholding in the Chinese subsidiaries.

Strong growth is expected in the AMER region (19.7% per year), but revenues will be low (share of less than 8%). Given that revenues have been higher than expected this year, particularly as a result of a partnership in the US which was established in 2014, it is not unlikely that even higher growth potential can be realized in America.

Operating Expenses/EBITA

As a whole, the increase in gross margin in the retail segment forecast is attributable to the aforementioned shifts in extensive hardware investments by major European companies and the associated scale effects, as well as to strategic measures which have been initiated and pursued by the company (the Delta restructuring program, inorganic growth in higher-margin software and service products, development of “high end” hardware and innovative products in the AEVI segment). These strategic measures will continue to have an effect in the ensuing years, and are expected to have a growing impact.

While the above-average margin in the hardware business cannot be maintained, gross margin for software and service products will increase continuously over the forecast period due to the expansion of the higher-margin professional services and managed services business, and will be reinforced by the expected inorganic growth.

The effects mentioned above will cause absolute EBITA in the retail segment to climb to €55 million in the current year (2015/16), with a margin of 5.3%. According to expectation, this level will be held the next year (2016/17) and then exceeded at the end of the forecast period (2017/18) due to the growing share of the higher-margin software and services business (EBITA margin: 6.4%).

-63-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Accordingly, the retail segment is expected to report an EBITA margin much lower than that of the banking segment (EBITA margin: 9.0%), as has been observed in the past. This is a result of the fact that the products and services in the retail segment are less complex as a whole, while the structure of the business allows for fewer scale effects and customers in this segment are more price-sensitive than in the banking segment.

cd) Overall Assessment

As a whole, the individual developments described will cause revenues to increase to € 2.765 million through the end of the detailed forecast period, with EBITA improving to € 220 million. This would represent an average revenue growth of 4.4% and a target margin of 8.0%, which would be a substantial improvement over the performance observed in the past. The margin is in the upper end of the range communicated by Wincor Nixdorf (6-8%). This indicates that the forecast assumes that Financial Year 2017/18 will represent a high point in the economic cycle.

The forecasted revenue growth is within the range posted by the competitors NCR and Diebold Inc., whose analyst estimates we have examined. Over an extended historical period (2009-2015), those companies posted annualized growth rates of 11% (NCR) and 3% (Diebold Inc.), although NCR’s growth is primarily attributable to acquisitions. The mid-term (2017) expectations for these companies are different: with NCR expected to stagnate while Diebold Inc. is expected to post strong 11% growth.

Wincor Nixdorf’s target EBITA margin is also within the range posted by its competitors. Both companies have posted average margins of around 6% over an extended historical period, and NCR’s margin, which reached 14% in 2012, is expected to increase to 13% in 2017 while Diebold Inc. is expected to increase its margin to 7%.

In examining the different expectations for the three competitors, it should be kept in mind that differences exist with regard to customer structure and regional distribution.

The Valuation Expert considers the revenue forecast for the banking segment to be comprehensible and plausible on the whole, but points out that the growth forecast for the software business is based in part on acquisitions for which target companies have not yet been identified. He considers this growth forecast to be overly ambitious in the software segment.

-64-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The revenue forecast for the retail segment is entirely realistic, in his view. The revenue targets for the hardware business are attainable, in his view, and the revenue targets for software/services are comprehensible, particularly in light of the additional business generated by AEVI.

The valuation expert considers the forecast of expenses to be comprehensible, in summary.

As a whole, he views the forecasts presented by Wincor Nixdorf to be suitable for the purposes of the valuation.

Based on the justifications for the forecast items which were provided to us in each particular case through documentation of the forecasts and explanations from Wincor Nixdorf’s management, and taking into account the company’s own historical performance, and comparing this performance against general market expectations, as well as the expectations for the performance of key competitors, we are able to confirm the valuation expert’s assessment. In our view, the forecasts of revenues and operating results are not overly ambitious and attainable.

We particularly share the valuation expert’s assessment that events in the recent past and the currently expected market prices for acquisitions indicate that realization of the planned acquisitions is a rather optimistic forecasting assumption, especially since the acquisition targets have yet to be specified. The company’s management board is of the view that, in the event the targeted acquisitions cannot be executed at the expected time, the additional revenue growth from the planned acquisitions and the associated contributions to EBITA can also be generated organically.

In view of the key strengths and weaknesses of Wincor Nixdorf, as well as the key risks and opportunities, as accurately summarized in the valuation opinion, we consider the company’s EBITA forecast for the years 2015/16 and 2017/18 to be a suitable basis, on the whole, for determining an objectified valuation.

-65-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

d) Contribution to Earnings of Synergies of Relevance for the Valuation

Diebold Inc. and Wincor Nixdorf have created joint working groups in order to identify and measure potential synergies. As things currently stand, it is expected that, after the end of the third year after execution of the takeover offer, i.e. in Financial Year 2018/19. Wincor Nixdorf as a whole, i.e. the two parties to the merger, will be able to derive annual synergy effects of $ 160 million and € 150 million respectively.

In view of the fact that key aspects of these synergies can be realized only after conclusion of the DPLA, and therefore cannot be recognized as real synergies upon determination of the objectified valuation of Wincor Nixdorf, the historical values of pseudo synergies on the part of Wincor Nixdorf are presented in the valuation opinion, according to the calculations of the working groups, based on probabilities of occurrence, depending on the current degree of specification of each measure. At the beginning of the time series presented, dyssynergies and realization costs exceed positive synergy effects. Starting in Wincor Nixdorf’s 2019/20 Financial Year, full realization of all pseudo synergy effects for Wincor Nixdorf is recognized at a value of € 16 million.

The valuation expert has analyzed the conclusions of the working groups and accurately summarized these conclusions in the valuation opinion. In calculating the objectified valuation of Wincor Nixdorf, the valuation expert has taken into account the fact that (diys-) synergies and realization costs are already included in EBITA for Financial Year 2015/16 as part of transaction costs (see Section C.IV.4.ca). For the forecast years 2016/17 and 2017/18, EBITA before synergies (including one-time effects and transaction costs) is supplemented by the net total of established positive and negative synergy effects. Since the full realization of synergy effects will take place beyond Wincor Nixdorf’s forecast period, the valuation expert inserted a transitional year for the purpose of the valuation (2018/19) so that the net positive synergy effect of € 15 million could be included in the valuation. The minor realization costs included in that year’s forecast will not accrue in the terminal value phase as well. Taking into account inflation-related growth effects, the additional synergy effect recognized in the perpetual annuity amounts to € 16 million.

-66-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In the course of our audit, we were able to reproduce the working groups’ analyses underlying the synergy calculation in the valuation both substantively and mathematically. To the extent possible, we have reconciled and checked the plausibility of the analyses using documents prepared or audited by third parties, such as consolidated financial statements. This did not result in any objections. No other pseudo synergy effects were identified over the course of our audit. In view of the fact that a large number of the measures underlying the forecast were still in the planning stage at the time of the audit, or had only begun to be implemented, a conclusive assessment is only possible to a limited extent. But on the whole, the total amount of synergies of relevance for the valuation is not objectionable based on the available information.

We deem the handling of identified pseudo synergies in the valuation model, particularly the insertion of a transitional year, to be appropriate. We were also able to verify these calculations mathematically without objection.

EBITA after synergies (including one-time effects and transaction costs) rises in the detailed forecast period from € 145 million (2015/16) to € 182 million (2016/17), and then to € 220 million (2017/18). This represents an EBITA margin of 5.6%, 6.9% and 8.0%.

e) EBITA in the Perpetual Annuity

Interspersing a transitional year (2018/19), the valuation expert converted the estimates for the detailed forecast period into the expected average EBITA for the terminal value phase. By this method, the valuation expert ensures that the full amount of relevant synergies are recognized only after 2018/19 (see Section C.IV.d). Otherwise, the determination of EBITA for this transitional year conforms to the method of calculating EBITA in the terminal value phase. The method presented below therefore applies both for the transitional year (2018/19) and for all subsequent years (starting in 2019/20).

Taking into account the general price pressure in the hardware business and the positive market outlook for the software/services business, and taking risks and opportunities into consideration, the valuation expert deemed permanent revenue growth of 0.75% to be appropriate (see Section C.IV.5.c), and therefore set a revenue growth rate of 0.75% over the revenues in the final forecast year, 2017/2018 (€ 2.765 million), beginning with the transitional year of 2018/19.

-67-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Permanent EBITA was calculated by the valuation expert using the resulting revenue level and a normalized EBITA margin.

In determining the attainable EBITA margin in the terminal value phase, the valuation expert first examined the (unadjusted) historical data. In the twelve-year period beginning with Financial Year 2003/04 and ending with the most recent completed Financial Year, 2014/15, (unadjusted) EBITA margins of between 0.9% and 8.9% were posted. On average, the (unadjusted) EBITA margin for this period s 6.7%. The extreme values in particular should not be seen as representative for determining the average long-term EBITA margin attainable by the company. Moreover, the company’s business model has changed in this time.

In the forecast years, the expected EBITA margin (before synergies) is 7.6%, 7.3% and 8.0% respectively. The first forecast year (before transaction costs) is characterized by some positive effects, particularly due to unexpectedly rapid implementation of the Delta restructuring program. Whether the EBITA margin of 8.0% in the forecast for Financial Year 2017/18 can be reached depends on whether the process of transformation underlying this expectation will result in a higher share of software and services to the anticipated extent. This would require, in particular, realization of the planned inorganic growth, as well as the revenues and earnings arising from the expectations for AEVI, which involve higher risks than the other forecast parameters. In addition, the business model is to be revised, particularly with regard to hardware, which will involve added costs.

In light of economic and business cycles as well, the valuation expert does not consider the EBITA margin in forecast year 2017/18 to be attainable, on average, over the long term. For this reason, the valuation expert shortened the period under examination to a six-year period and postponed its commencement. Examining a period from 2012/13 to 2017/18, it may be assumed that this period reflects approximately one complete cycle. Moreover, this period better reflects the present business model. Based on adjusted EBITA margins, EBITA margins in this period range from 4.2% to 8.0%, for an average of 6.4%.

Taking into account the positive effects from transformation of the business model, as well as management’s goals (EBITA margin of 6% to 8%), the valuation expert considers an EBITA margin of 7.0%(before synergies) to be appropriate for determining the permanent earnings of Wincor Nixdorf. Assuming that the full amount of pseudo synergies included in the forecast, € 16 million, can be realized in the long term as well, would result in an EBITA margin of 7.6%.

-68-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

On this basis, the Valuation Expert’s estimates that the EBITA margin for the perpetual annuity will be 7.6%. EBITA (after synergies) in the transitional year is therefore € 210 million. For the perpetual annuity, the Valuation Expert has based the calculation of Wincor Nixdorf’s objectified valuation on an EBITA (after synergies) of € 212 million.

We deem the Valuation Expert’s considerations to be comprehensible. Further taking into account that margin should be viewed as rather high relative to the competition (see Section C.IV.4.cd), and making reference to the aforementioned risks that certain developments which underlie the derivation of this margin will not materialize to the expected extent, we deem the recognition of an EBITA margin of 7.6% to be appropriate in terms of the Stock Corporation Act.

f) Net Income After Personal Income Taxes

fa) Cash Flow Adjustments in the Perpetual Annuity

In addition to projecting forward the income statement estimates for the final year of the forecast into the perpetual annuity phase, it is also necessary to project forward the balance sheet forecast. With revenues and net cash flows growing at a rate of 0.75%, net current assets are expected to grow by 0.75%. On this basis, the Valuation Expert deducted a permanent investment of €2 million in net current assets from permanent EBITA. Further cash outflows from growth in the company’s balance sheet were not assumed by the Valuation Expert.

The Valuation Expert also assumes notional additional borrowings in the amount of the growth rate, relative to net financial obligations at the end of the detailed forecast period, so as to maintain a constant capital structure. Borrowings of € 2 million are available for the shareholders in addition to expected net income.

On balance, the cash flow adjustments have no net impact in the perpetual annuity phase of this valuation. We were able to reproduce the assumptions and calculations for derivation of the cash flow adjustments in the perpetual annuity without objections.

-69-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

fb) Net Financial Income

The Valuation Expert derived net financial income based on the company’s financial position on 30 September 2015 and an integrated projection of the balance sheet and financial forecast.

The company’s balance sheet and financial forecast was used as a basis. The company revised its balance sheet estimates for 2015/16 in the forecast. The Valuation Expert carried these revisions forward into the two remaining forecast years based on information provided by the Company’s management.

The balance sheet and financial estimates have been revised with regard to existing stock option programs. As of the Valuation Date, Wincor Nixdorf has issued a total of 2,684,455 stock options to four executives as part of four stock option programs. In the past, these programs have been classified as equity instruments for the purposes of compensation (equity settlement). In accordance with a resolution which was adopted at the end of the third quarter of 2015/16, the company reclassified its obligation as a cash settlement, and it was recognized as such in the consolidated balance sheet of 30 June 2016. The Valuation Expert has determined the fair value of the associated payment obligations as of 30 September 2016 (€ 11.6 million) and carried it forward based on the expected payments. The Valuation Expert determined the fair value of payment obligation under the stock option programs based on option valuations using the Black-Scholes model, taking into account expected fluctuation rates.

We deem this addition to the balance sheet forecast to be appropriate and were able to reproduce the measurement of the stock options substantively and mathematically without objections.

The Valuation Expert also projected liquid funds, in consultation with the company, for the purposes of the valuation. Based on the last twelve quarterly financial statements through 31 March 2016, there was an average ratio of liquid funds to quarterly revenues of 8.8%. The company deems the amount of liquid funds determined in this manner to be necessary for operations. The Valuation Expert carried forward the balance sheet and financial forecast on this basis.

-70-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

We have verified the assessment that 8.8% of quarterly revenues are to be regarded as necessary for operations based on competitors’ analyses. These resulted in much higher average amounts of liquid funds. As a result, we deem the forecast of liquidity to be adequate.

We were able to follow the company’s balance sheet forecast without objections, substantively and mathematically.

Interest-bearing obligations as of 30 September 2015 largely consisted of a long-term bank loan (€ 85 million), current account loans from various domestic and foreign banks (€ 86 million) and reserves for pensions (€ 83 million).

The Valuation Expert determined net financial income in the detailed forecast period based on existing interest rates for investments and loans (0.0 to 0.6%), a swap rate in effect through 30 September 2020 for part of the obligations (3.0%) and the actuarial interest rate for the pension reserves (2.0%), and carrying forward financial obligations in an integrated calculation of financing requirements. The Valuation Expert slightly increased the range of estimated interest rates on bank loans in the perpetual annuity phase, with the range extending from 0.3% to 0.7%.

We were able to follow the financial forecast integrated into the valuation model without objections, substantively and mathematically. We were also able to verify the conditions in effect on 30 September 2015 for net financial obligations. The slight increase in interest rates is plausible in our view and consistent with the discount rate, especially since a low average interest rate will take effect in the future due to expiration of the swap.

The interest expenses calculated in this manner lie in a narrow range from € 6 to 7 million (detailed forecast period) and € 5 million in the perpetual annuity phase.

fc) Corporate Taxes and Minority Share

The Valuation Expert derived the company’s income tax expense based on its earnings before taxes (EBT), determined in accordance with the IFRS and modified as required by the valuation methodology, based on the method of calculating taxes in the company forecast.

-71-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Foreign income taxes were determined by the Valuation Expert by multiplying the EBT attributable to foreign companies by the country-specific effective income tax rates, taking into account foreign tax loss carry-forwards. Insofar as foreign tax loss carry-forwards were not fully exhausted in the detailed forecast period, the Valuation Expert reflected the remaining amounts in the perpetual annuity phase in the form of an annuity. EBT was also determined separately for German companies not included in the single-entity tax relationship, and multiplied by effective income tax rates.

The remaining Group EBT was attributed by the Valuation Expert to the German single-entity relationship for income tax purposes. Insofar as income was included for which the company was unable to conclusively assess the tax consequences as of the Valuation Date (e.g. the expected book gains from partial sale of the Chinese operations), this income was taxed at a flat rate. The remaining EBT of the German single-entity relationship was adjusted to account for the major impact of IFRS accounting relative to German tax law, as well as for non-deductible business expenses. The corporate tax rate (15.0% plus the 5.5% solidarity surcharge) was applied to the resulting tax base. To calculate trade tax, the Valuation Expert modified the corporate tax base by applying increases and decreases in accordance with trade tax rules and multiplied the result by the product of the tax index and the average trade tax assessment rate of 410%.

The Valuation Expert’s calculation of corporate taxes is not objectionable. We were able to reconcile it with the underlying data, check the plausibility of necessary assumptions and reproduce the derivation mathematically.

The company’s tax expense calculated in this manner ranges from € 38 million to € 64 million in the detailed forecast period, and comes to € 59 million in the terminal value phase. The effective tax rate in the detailed forecast period is between 27.4% and 31.7%. The terminal value phase has an effective tax rate of 28.5%.

Given that five Group companies are not wholly owned by Wincor Nixdorf, it is necessary to deduct minority shares. The Valuation Expert accurately derived these shares from the estimated results of the individual companies.

-72-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Minority shares of earnings are in a narrow range, from €2 million to € 3 million in the detailed forecast period, and € 3 million. in the perpetual annuity.

fd) Net Cash Flows After Personal Income Taxes

In accordance with IDW S1, when determining objectified valuations for the detailed forecast periods, valuation practitioners are to assume distribution of the available net income based on the company’s documented concept as of the valuation date, subject to legal restrictions. For the perpetual annuity phase, it is generally assumed that the company for which the valuation is being performed will adopt distribution practices equivalent to the distribution practices of the alternative investment, except insofar as unique aspects of the industry, capital structure and legal conditions are to be taken into account.

Carrying forward the distribution policy pursued by the company to date, the Valuation Expert set a distribution rate of 50% for the transitional year. We were able to verify this assumption based on the company’s historical distribution practices. No indications were found that the company will pursue a different distribution policy in the future on a stand-alone basis.

The Valuation Expert assumed a market-typical distribution rate of 50% in the perpetual annuity phase. This assumption is based on the average distribution rate in the German capital market.

In order to ensure that the numerator and denominator of the valuation equation are equivalent, it is recommended in the literature that the same peer group which was used for derivation of the beta factor should also be used for the determination of perpetual distribution practices for the Valuation Object. We therefore examined the distribution practices of the peer group companies used for determination of the beta factor in the period from 2011 to 2015 in order to check the plausibility of the permanent distribution rate used by the Valuation Expert. Insofar as these companies made distributions at all, their distribution rates ranged from 9% to 103%, and averaged 34%.

Since the distribution practices of the peer group companies were very inconsistent, we also examined calculations of average market distribution rates for publicly traded German companies. These studies confirm average distribution rates of 40 to 60%. The distribution rate used in the valuation, 50%, is in the middle of this range. On this basis, we deem the distribution rate used for the terminal value phase to be appropriate.

-73-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Retained earnings in the continued detailed forecast period are transferred to shareholders’ equity in value-neutral fashion. They are used to replenish net current assets and investments and to amortize debt and are therefore not available for distribution to the shareholders. Because of this use, it will not be necessary to make additional borrowings. This improves net financial income and reduces the debt ratio, resulting in lower capitalization interest rates. A conceivable alternative use, notional attribution of undistributed amounts to the shareholders, would not result in a higher valuation. Retained earnings in the terminal value phase, on the other hand, are notionally attributed to shareholders and are therefore not available for alternative uses.

The Valuation Expert divided Wincor Nixdorf’s earnings for the terminal value phase into dividends and retained earnings according to the described ratio. The dividends in the detailed forecast period are evident from the presented distribution forecast. Dividends are generally to be reduced by the 26.375% flat tax. The Valuation Expert uses half this tax rate to calculate personal taxes for the notional attribution of retained earnings (terminal value phase).

The recommendation in the literature (Wagner/Saur/Willershausen, Zur Anwendung der Neuerungen der Unternehmensbewertungsgrundsätze des IDW S 1 i.d.F. 2008 in der Praxis, WPg 2008, pp. 731 et seq.) that half the flat tax rate be used for capital gains was made in summer 2008, i.e. a time at which the impact of the ensuing capital market crises were only beginning to be felt and the risk-free rate was at a much higher level. In addition, the authors of that recommendation assumed an average company with an average risk position and distribution rate.

With a resulting rate of return of 5%, and based on the existing tax regime, this recommendation corresponds to a holding period of about 40 years, which seems long. This simplified methodology, which is practiced as a general rule as well, benefits minority shareholders in this case and is therefore not objectionable.

-74-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In summary, we deem the method chosen by PwC for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf with regard to distribution practices and the taxation of distributions to be appropriate and adequate for the reasons given. On this basis, the net cash flow to be discounted is derived as follows:

Wincor Nixdorf: Net Cash Flow	Forecast						Transitio- nal year		Perpetual
	2015/16		2016/17		2017/18		2018/19		2019/20 ff.
	€ million.		€ million.		€ million.		€ million.		€ million.
EBITA after synergies (including one-time effects and transaction costs)		145		182		220		210		212
Perpetual investments in net current assets		—		—		—		—		-2
Borrowings to finance growth		—		—		—		—		2
EBITA after synergies and cash flow adjustments in terminal value phase		145		182		220		210		212
Net financial income		-6		-6		-7		-6		-5
Earnings before taxes (EBT)		139		176		214		204		206
Corporate taxes		-38		-56		-64		-57		-59
Earnings after taxes		101		120		149		147		147
Minority shares		-2		-2		-3		-3		-3
Earnings after taxes and minority shares		99		118		146		144		144
Retained earnings		-49		-59		-73		-72		-72
Distributions		49		59		73		72		72
Personal income taxes		-13		-16		-19		-19		-19
Distributions after personal income taxes		36		43		54		53		53
Notional attribution of retained earnings		—		—		—		—		72
Personal income taxes on notional attributions		—		—		—		—		-10
Retained earnings after personal income taxes		—		—		—		—		63
Net cash flow		36		43		54		53		116

5. Discount Rate

The valuation is determined, assuming exclusively financial objectives, by the present value of net cash flows to the shareholders associated with ownership in the company. The present value of these cash flows is derived using a discount rate amounting to the rate of return from an investment which represents an adequate alternative to investment in the company.

This rate of return can essentially be broken down into a risk-free rate and the risk premium demanded by shareholders in exchange for the assumption of entrepreneurial risk. Tax factors are to be taken into account in determining the risk-free rate and risk premium. The discount rate is diminished by a growth discount in order to account for growth effects in the form of steadily growing cash flows after the end of the detailed forecast period.

-75-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

a) Risk-free rate

In determining the risk-free rate, it is to be kept in mind that an investment in the company is to be compared to a risk-free alternative investment with an equivalent term. Insofar as the company for which the valuation is being performed will have an unlimited term, the risk-free rate must be the rate of return in effect on the valuation date for a risk-free capital market investment which is likewise unlimited.

Risk-free bonds or bonds of unlimited duration do not exist in the German capital market. Accordingly, the risk-free rate cannot be directly observed in the capital market. Accordingly, the prevailing view is that the interest rate on long-term government bonds, as virtually risk-free capital market investments, may be used to determine the interest rate of risk-free investments.

Since German government bonds of unlimited duration, as alternative investments with an equivalent term, are not available in the German capital market, it is necessary to estimate the rate of return for an unlimited term.

IDW S 1 recommends deriving the risk-free rate from current interest yield curves. This recommendation was specified by IDW’s Valuation Committee in its notes on determination of the risk-free rate based on market data using interest yield curves, which appeared in IDW’s journal, IDW-Fachnachrichten (2005, pp. 555 et seq., 2008, pp. 490 et seq. and 2013, pp. 363 et sq.).

Interest yield curves can be derived or estimated in various ways. The Committee recommends that, in the interests of objectivity, all such determinations should be based on the data of Deutsche Bundesbank or methodologically comparable data of the European Central Bank.

Deutsche Bundesbank has estimated the interest yield curve on a daily basis since 1997 using the “Svensson method.” This method involves directly estimating yields on zero-coupon bonds based on the observable current yields of government bonds and discount paper with residual terms of up to 30 years. When estimating yields on zero-coupon bonds for terms in excess of 30 years, the Committee’s view is that the yields on zero-coupon bonds with a residual term of 30 years can generally be used as a perpetual estimate given the residual terms included in the exponential function developed by Deutsche Bundesbank and in view of general forecasting uncertainty.

-76-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

When using the interest yield curve, the income for each year is generally discounted using the interest rate for the equivalent term. In the interests of practicability, a single risk-free rate is typically calculated based on the interest yield curve for the entire period. To this end, a single interest rate with an equivalent present value is determined from the interest yield curve depending on the length of the forecast period and the expected growth rates for the subsequent perpetual annuity phase.

In order to smooth out short-term market fluctuations and possible errors in estimation, the Committee also recommends against using just the estimated yield on zero-coupon bonds as of the valuation date, but instead using averages, particularly for the long-term yields which are typically relevant in business valuations. These period-specific averages are to be derived from the estimated yields in the three months prior to the valuation date (the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt approves this recommendation in its judgment of 29 January 2016, Case No, 21 W 70/15, as does the Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf in its judgment of 29 February 2012, Case No. I-26 W 2/10).

The previously typical valuation practice of rounding the risk-free rate up or down to the nearest quarter of a percent was elaborated upon by the Committee in its recent recommendation of 13 July 2016. In light of the enduring low-interest environment, the Committee recommends rounding to the nearest tenth of a percent when the risk-free rate derived from interest yield data comes out to less than 1.0%.

There is isolated criticism in the literature of the Committee’s recommendation to use averages in order to reduce complexity and smooth out short-term market fluctuations, as well as possible errors in estimation, as well as of the previous practice of rounding to the nearest quarter of a percent.

Despite these concerns, we consider the mode of procedure described above to be appropriate for the reasons cited, and we further point out that the determination of a risk-free rate with several digits after the decimal point may falsely imply a degree of precision which is not attainable in business valuations, as is generally known, in view of the uncertainty associated with forecasting future earnings and the need for rounding in the derivation of the market risk premium.

-77-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In the recent case law (e.g. Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf, 12 November 2015, Case No. I-26 W 9/14; Higher Regional Court of Munich, 5 May 2015, Case No. 31 Wx 366/13; Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart, 15 October 2013, Case No. 20 W 3/13; Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main, 5 March 2012, Case No. 21 W 11/11), determination of the risk-free rate using Deutsche Bundesbank’s interest yield curve is also considered to be an appropriate and satisfactory method, since using hypothetical interest rates on zero-coupon bonds ensures the requisite objectivity

Based on the interest yield curve, the Valuation Expert calculated a standard pre-tax risk-free rate for the present – rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent – of 0.7%. This interest rate is based on an estimate of future average interest rates based on interest yield curve data from Deutsche Bundesbank for the period from 16 May to 15 August 2016. For the conversion of period-specific interest rates into a single risk-free rate for all periods, in order to simplify the presentation, the Valuation Expert used a typical growth rate of 0.5% in the payment series. We have found that variations in this growth assumption and use of the actual series of net distributions planned by Wincor Nixdorf have no effect on pre-tax risk-free rate, which has been rounded accordingly and accurately computed.

In ascertaining whether the cash compensation at the time of the GM on 26 September 2016 is at least equivalent to the shareholder’s share of the company’s value as of 26 September 2016, or whether the compensation payment derived from the valuation as of 26 September 2016 will continue to be adequate, it must be kept in mind that, in accordance with the method recommended by the Committee, the risk-free rate is to be recalculated taking into account the capital market data for the three most recent months. This need not necessarily involve a change in the valuation, since the impact on other valuation parameters would likewise have to be examined.

The pre-tax risk-free rate of 0.7% used by the Valuation Expert can be converted into an after-tax risk-free rate of 0.52% using the flat tax rate on interest income (for a total of 26.375%).

-78-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In summary, we deem the after-tax risk-free rate used by the Valuation Expert to be justified and adequate.

b) Risk Premium

ba) Preliminary Considerations

An investment in a company carries a higher risk than an investment in public-sector securities. In order to create an equivalency of risk between the alternatives, the uncertainty with respect to future net cash flows can essentially be incorporated into the valuation as a discount from future cash flows or added as a premium to the discount rate.

The risk premium method, which is typically applied nationally and internationally, has the advantage of being based on empirically observable practices. Regardless of which form and shape a risk/benefit function assumes in theory, the risk premium method is capable of reflecting market-oriented practices in the determination of risk premiums. The risk premium method is consistent with IDW S 1 and the method typically applied in valuation practice.

Determination of the risk premium generally depends on the shareholder’s risk preference. In a case where a large number of shareholders are involved, however, it is not possible to ascertain their individual risk preference. As a result, it is typical when performing objectified business valuations to rely on capital market pricing models in order to ascertain the risk premium and to derive the risk premium directly from the capital market. This assumption makes it possible to describe the risk assessment of a large number of shareholders in the valuation model, which is reflected in the share price through supply and demand.

Since the company for which the valuation is being performed generally differs from the companies for which the historical risk premiums were measured given its specific risk structure, the risk premium has to be adjusted to account for these differences. The company-specific risk premium should reflect both operating risk, which is based on the nature of the company’s operations, and capital structure risk, which is affected by the company’s debt ratio.

The IDW S1 standard explicitly refers to the capital asset pricing model (“CAPM”), as well as the Tax CAPM, which supplements the standard CAPM by taking into account the impact of personal income taxes, for the determination of discount rates in business valuations based on theoretical capital market models.

-79-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In the CAPM respectively the Tax CAPM, the risk premium is determined by multiplying the average market price for assuming risk in the capital market (the market risk premium) by the company-specific risk (beta factor). Market risk is defined as the difference between the rate of return from the shares of a group of publicly traded companies and the rate of return from a virtually risk-free capital market investment (the risk-free rate). Individual company risk is measured by the beta factor, which represents the covariance between the fluctuation in the rate of return of an individual stock and that of the general market. In other words, it describes the sensitivity of one stock’s performance to the performance of the underlying market portfolio. If, in any individual case, the risk associated with the individual company corresponds to the risk of the stock portfolio, then the discount rate equals the portfolio’s rate of return.

The use of the CAPM for the determination of risk premiums in business valuations is not uncontroversial in the literature and case law. In fact, use of the CAPM is rejected in certain isolated judgments, citing the numerous fundamental concerns about the model. To support their view, opponents of the CAPM argue that the capital market, due to its incomplete nature, cannot supply reliable information as to the future scope of risk of any given company.

Despite all of this criticism, the CAPM continues to be the preferred model for the determination of risk premiums in accordance with the prevailing view in valuation literature and practice (Wagner/Jonas/Ballwieser/Tschöpel, Weiterentwicklung der Grundsätze zur Durchführung von Unternehmensbewertungen (IDW S 1), WPg 2004, pp. 889 et seq.).

This conclusion is also being increasingly reached in the recent case law (e.g. Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main, 5 February 2016, Case No. 21 W 69/14; Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf, 12 November 2015, Case No. I-26 W 9/14; Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe, 23 July 2015, Case No. 12a W 4/15; Higher Regional Court of Munich, 18 April 2015).

Furthermore, the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main confirms, in its Order of 2 May 2011 (Case No. 21 W 3/11), that the CAPM is superior to free estimation of the risk premium if only due to the greater transparency of the former method, stressing that the CAPM is currently the most important model for determining risk-appropriate capital costs.

-80-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

For the reasons mentioned above, we deem it appropriate in this specific case to measure the risk premium using the CAPM respectively the Tax CAPM.

bb) Market Risk Premium

The question as to which capital market studies accurately reflect the observable market risk premium is a subject of controversy in business administration theory and valuation practice. Most of the numerous published capital market studies have shown that, historically, investments in stocks have largely generated higher returns than investments in virtually risk-free government bonds.

In assessing these capital market studies, it must be kept in mind that the findings of international studies are not necessarily applicable to German conditions. For one thing, these studies fail to account for the unique features of the German system of taxation. Moreover, given its small number of publicly traded companies relative to other countries, the German capital market cannot be compared, e.g. to capital markets in the English-speaking world without qualifications. Accordingly, we relied upon German studies for estimation of the future market risk premium.

Analysis of the available German capital market studies, and the use of those studies for determination of the expected future market risk premium in the CAPM, are complicated by the fact that these studies do not use the same data for the determination of market risk premiums observed in the past. This is evident from the fact that the available studies use different reference periods and reference indices, the absence of a consistent method of accounting for inflation and taxes and the manner in which individual historical market risk premiums are averaged into a representative overall value, using the arithmetic or geometric mean. Accordingly, even the domestic capital market studies are comparable only with qualifications.

The IDW Valuation Committee first issued an opinion as to the specific expected market risk premium at its 84th session on 10 December 2004. The Committee stated in this opinion that, for business valuations on or after 31 December 2004, an after-tax market risk premium of between 5.0% and 6.0% would be appropriate unless opposed by the circumstances of the individual case.

-81-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The Committee’s recommendation was based in particular on the results of Stehle’s capital market study, which ascertained market risk premiums while accounting for personal taxes in explicit and differentiated fashion, and was therefore viewed by the Committee as particularly suitable with respect to the estimation of future market risk premiums in the context of business valuations.

This study finds, for a reference period from 1955 to 2003, that after-tax risk premiums in the German capital market were 6.66% (arithmetic mean, CDAX) and 3.83% (geometric mean, CDAX). Based on the after-tax market risk premium (6.66%) which he derived using the arithmetic mean from the CDAX comparison, and taking into account a discount of around 1.0%, Stehle concludes that a future market risk premium of 5.5% is defensible for valuation purposes. In the end, Stehle advocates a risk premium of 5.5%.

However, the method chosen by Stehle to measure future market risk premiums is a subject of controversy to this day, due in particular to the reference period which was chosen and the use of the arithmetic mean to determine the results.

To our knowledge, a conclusive view has yet to emerge in business administration doctrine with respect to the question as to whether historical market risk premiums are accurately reflected using the arithmetic or geometric mean. A number of empirical studies have been published in the US valuation literature based on which the conclusion can be drawn that the actual market risk premium is somewhere between the arithmetic and geometric means, and not at either one of the extremes.

Until this question is clarified, the Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main has also deemed it sensible, in accordance with IDW’s recommendation, to use a value lying somewhere between the geometric and the arithmetic mean in order to provide a realistic market risk premium (Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main, 5 March 2012, Case No. 21 W 11/11, and 24 November 2011, Case No. 21 W 7/11).

-82-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe has also reached the conclusion that “an empirically precise determination of the market risk premium” is not possible given the current state of the economic sciences. Accordingly, there are multiple defensible methods in addition to the arithmetic mean (Higher Regional Court of Karlsruhe, 23 July 2015, Case No. 12a W 4/15).

Calculating the average of the arithmetic and geometric means based on the market risk premiums determined by Stehle and taking into account typical taxes on income results in a value of 5.25% for the CDAX.

Taking into account the other studies which examine very long periods, and assuming that taking the average of the arithmetic and geometric mean of annualized rates of return is a pragmatic method for estimating the market risk premium, the spread recommended by IDW for valuation dates prior to 1 January 2009 (5.0% to 6.0%, after personal taxes) presently appears to be not implausible.

Stehle’s empirical study was carried forward to the year 2006 by Ballwieser, Kruschwitz and Löffler, and the result was to increase the estimated after-tax market risk premiums for the CDAX to 7.22% (arithmetic mean) and 4.56% (geometric mean), for an average of 5.89%.

However, empirically observed historical market risk premiums can only provide a starting point for further considerations in connection with derivation of the future market risk premium.

In accordance with the principle of equivalence as it applies to future periods in business valuations, Stehle recommends a discount on the historical market risk premiums. Such a discount is justified by the improved opportunities which investors today have for limiting risk by means of diversification, as well as the possibility that the risk of price fluctuations may be lower in the future. The Stehle study uses a discount of 1.0% to 1.5%, without further explanation.

The use of such a discount is a subject of controversy in the literature. Some even have expressed the view that a contrary development is to be expected. Based on the information available to us, a majority opinion has yet to form on this question.

-83-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

For valuation dates prior to 1 January 2009, the Committee has endorsed a future after-tax market risk premium of between 5.0% and 6.0%. This recommendation is not objectionable, in our view, despite the aforementioned uncertainty concerning the determination of market risk premiums observed in the past and derivation of the future market risk premium from those historical premiums.

IDW’s recommendations concerning the amount of the market risk premium for the period between 1 January 2005 and the adoption of the flat tax have been approved by the courts (e.g. Higher Regional Court of Munich, 26 July 2012, Case No. 31 Wx 250/11; Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf of 4 July 2012, Case No. I-26 W 8/10; Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main, 5 March 2012, Case No. 21 W 11/11; Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart, 17 October 2011, Case No. 20 W 7/11).

Circumstances in the German capital market have changed repeatedly (and substantially) as a result of tax conditions. After a market risk premium of 5.0% to 6.0% (after personal taxes) was established for valuation dates as of 1 January 2005, the taxation of investments in Germany was thoroughly reformed (once again) at the start of the year 2009. New investments as of 1 January 2009 are subject to a flat tax, which applies at an equal (nominal) rate to interest and dividends as well as capital gains. This change in the taxation system could not help but have an impact on the market risk premium which is to be expected in the future.

Following this change, the (simplifying) assumption that capital gains will remain tax-free (an assumption which tended to boost the valuation) could no longer be made. However, it must also be kept in mind that the period of time for which stocks are held has an impact on the effective tax rate, since postponement of the tax liability results in a present value benefit for the stock investor. The amount of this present value benefit depends in part on the holding period of the stocks.

In order to precisely calculate the impact of the 2008 corporate tax reform on the amount of the market risk premium, it is necessary to know the average capital gains tax rate, with due regard for the flat tax. In order to calculate this capital gains tax rate, information e.g. concerning the average holding period for equities held by private investors and the performance of securities during this holding period, would be required. Insofar as this information is not available given the relatively short period of time since adoption of the flat tax, the actual impact on the amount of the market risk premium would have to be estimated.

-84-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The Valuation Committee has expressed the view that the after-tax market risk premium may be slightly diminished due to the impact of the tax reform (online report on the 95th Meeting of the Valuation Committee of 29 November 2007).

It states that the after-tax rate of return demanded by shareholders is an expression of risk aversion alone. Accordingly, the required (after-tax) rate of return is independent of the system of taxation. If investors are required to pay higher personal taxes on capital market investments due to the flat tax on future capital gains, they will compensate by demanding a higher rate of return. If these demands for higher returns are not fully enforceable in the capital market, due in part to the presence of foreign shareholders, who generally do not have to contend with a higher tax liability as a result of the corporate tax reform, the attainable after-tax rate of return for the typical domestic shareholder is reduced. The Committee states that a study of the 2003 tax reform in the US provides empirical confirmation of this modeled effect.

Based on a simulation which it conducted for valuation dates after the adoption of the capital gains taxation system on 1 January 2009, the Valuation Committee recommended that the market risk premium, after personal taxes, should be within a range from 4.0% to 5.0%. Given the risk-free interest rate level at the time, these ranges correspond to an after-tax rate of return of around 8%, which is the level demanded by market participants.

The higher courts have largely acknowledged IDW’s recommendations concerning the amount of the market risk premium following adoption of the flat tax (e.g. Higher Regional Court of Munich, 18 February 2014, Case No. 31 Wx 211/13; Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart, 15 October 2013, Case No. 20 W 3/13; Higher Regional Court of Frankfurt am Main, 2 May 2011, Case No. 21 W 3/11).

In view of the significant decrease in the yields on government bonds as a consequence of the financial and capital market crisis and the low (and in some cases negative) real rate of return from shorter-term (virtually) risk-free bonds, the stability of discount rates for valuation purposes has been a matter for discussion among valuation practitioners since 2011.

-85-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

With regard to this question, on 10 January 2012, the Committee recommended an examination, subject to additional announcements and recommendations based on further studies, into whether the increased uncertainty in the capital market and the associated increase in risk aversion should be accounted for by using a market risk premium at the upper edge of the aforementioned range. At IDW’s workshop in January 2012, even this recommendation on the part of the Valuation Committee was viewed by some participants in the discussion as possibly inadequate.

In its latest recommendation, which was made in light of the further discussion and the journal articles which have been published in that regard, as well as the development of interest rates (most recently confirmed on 6 April 2016), the Valuation Committee states that the appropriate range for market risk premiums is from 5.5% to 7.0% (before personal taxes), or from 5.0% to 6.0% (after personal taxes).

The Valuation Expert set the after-tax market risk premium in the middle of the range recommended by the Committee, i.e. at 5.5%.

We have performed some analyses in order to determine whether the Committee’s assessment is still accurate and, to this end, we examined the implicit market risk premiums underlying the Committee’s argumentation, as well as bond market spreads based on analyst estimates. We found that, based on this data, capital market risk premiums remain higher than where they were prior to the financial and capital market crisis. Based on these findings, we should expect that the risk premium is higher than it was before the crisis. The recent performance of the VDAX (DAX volatility) also shows that risk aversion in the market is trending higher.

Nevertheless, we would point out that the discussion in valuation literature and practice with regard to market risk premiums is not yet complete, and the empirical evidence concerning the interaction of the risk-free rate and the market risk premium have yet to be clarified. Assuming that real market yields remain constant in the long term in a corridor of around 7% to 10%, the market risk premium used in the valuation, 5.5%, would represent a low estimate.

For the reasons presented, the after-tax market risk premium chosen by the Valuation Expert, 5.5%, lying in the middle of the range recommended by the Committee after the crisis, is not objectionable.

-86-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

bc) Beta Factor

Preliminary Considerations

The estimated risk premium for a total market portfolio (market risk premium) must be adapted to suit the specific risk structure of the company for which the valuation is being performed using the CAPM. The relationship between general market risk and individual, company- and sector-specific risk is expressed by the “beta factor.”

Accordingly, it is necessary to calculate historical beta factors first and then estimate future risk on this basis.

In practice, it has been observed that valuation practitioners derive highly divergent beta factors for the same period. The selection of parameters can have a substantial impact on the amount of the historical beta factor which is measured.

In particular, historical beta factors depend on selection of the comparison index, the length of the estimation period, the periodicity of the underlying indices and the definition of when the reference period begins and ends.

Critics of the CAPM contend e.g. that, given the numerous decisions which need to be made with respect to the selection of individual parameters for determination of the beta factor, the valuation specialist can determine the beta factor at will, and that the determination process is often not transparent. In this way, the key advantage of the CAPM from a theoretical viewpoint over a system of general discretion-based risk premiums can, in practice, ultimately be turned on its head.

We do not share the fundamental concerns with respect to the CAPM approach. However, in light of the criticism, we deem it necessary to present and explain each of the examinations which have been performed through the technical derivation of beta factors and qualitative assessment of the results.

Market Portfolio

Since beta factor expresses the sensitivity of a stock’s performance to changes in the value of the market portfolio, the first question which needs to be clarified is that of the composition of the market portfolio.

-87-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In theory, the market portfolio consists of all risky investments existing anywhere in the world, and is not limited to just equities. In practice, this theoretically correct global market portfolio cannot be observed.

There are established international indices, for equities markets at least, and some of them are global in scope. For this reason, international indices are used at times, and at others, the broadest possible national market index is used as a standard. The latter method allows valuation practitioners to avoid distortions caused by currency exchange rates. For this reason, it may be appropriate to use the broadest possible national index as a standard for company-specific risk. We deem both methods to be theoretically admissible.

The Valuation Expert performed alternative calculations based on commonly used broad-based national indices using the local currency, as well as the global “MSCI World” index, for derivation of the beta factors.

When local indices are used, distortions based on currency translation cannot be ruled out given the use of a single currency, resulting in a wide range of beta factors. The chosen method is not objectionable, on the whole.

Period under Examination and Periodicity

Historical beta factors can generally be obtained for a variety of periods and intervals (daily, weekly, monthly) from financial data providers.

For the regression analysis, a certain number of data points are necessary in order to produce statistically significant results. The number of data points needed for statistical relevance is given as between 30 and 100 (Schneeweiß, Ökonometrie, 1990, p. 6). In valuation practice, beta factors are generally measured on a weekly basis over a two-year period (104 data points) or on a monthly basis over a five-year period (60 data points) in order to obtain a sufficient number of data points.

Daily measurement of returns would enable a larger sample, but is rarely chosen by valuation practitioners since it tends to have unfavorable empirical characteristics, and the beta factors which are measured on this basis are subject to greater fluctuation than beta factors which are measured at longer intervals.

-88-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In particular, the “intervalling effect” is cited in the literature as an argument against using daily measurement of returns. If trading volume in a stock is low, the stock price will not respond immediately to new information, and the stock’s performance will therefore not move in synchronous fashion with the chosen reference index.

For this reason, valuation practitioners usually compile weekly beta factors (see above). It should be kept in mind, however, that the weekly betas available from providers of financial market data are based not on the average value for the trading week, but on the closing price on the final trading day of the week.

Monthly returns, on the other hand, have more favorable statistical properties, as distortions in the beta factor are diminished as the interval increases in length. For this reason, beta factors are often compiled by valuation practitioners on a monthly basis over a five-year period.

An argument against the use of monthly betas, however, is that (very) long periods of time have to be examined in order to obtain a sufficient number of data points, so that comparability may be severely limited as a result of structural breaks. On the other hand, examining beta factors over an extended period of time may be advantageous in that this serves to eliminate the effects of market distortions such as those which may have resulted from the financial market crisis. Moreover, a five-year period is generally closer to the length of an economic cycle than a shorter period would be.

The Valuation Expert’s determination of the beta factor for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf was based on monthly beta factors over a five-year period, from July 2011 to July 2016, with the most recent measurement date on 27 July 2016.

The Valuation Expert argues that the use of beta factors over a five-year period reflects the fact that the performance of the company’s shares is dependent on overall market performance, which breaks down into various phases. We deem this method to be comprehensible in view of the service life of the relevant products (over six years) and the typical terms of software and service agreements (generally three to five years).

Both the Valuation Expert and we performed additional analyses of various periods and periodicities. In the course of these analyses, no evidence was found that the method chosen by the Valuation Expert operates to the detriment of minority shareholders in a one-sided manner. Accordingly, the Valuation Expert’s method is unobjectionable in the present case.

-89-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Suitability of the Forecast

The historical beta factors observed in the past do not necessarily reflect the risk which the Valuation Object will be subject to in the future. A future beta factor is to be estimated by the Valuation Expert based on an evaluation of the observed historical beta factors. The historical beta factors which are determined, e.g. for various periods, are no more than indicators of the future beta factor.

With respect to the questions which are raised concerning the periodicity of the measurement and the market portfolio used for the comparison, the determination of a beta factor in practice often depends on whether a “raw” or “adjusted” beta factor is used.

“Raw beta” is also known as historical beta, and can be calculated directly from the historical capital market data. In addition to raw beta, “adjusted beta” is also computed e.g. by Bloomberg. In this determination, the beta factor of the market portfolio (by definition 1.0) is assigned a weight of one third, while the “raw beta” has a weight of two thirds.

This weight is designed to eliminate errors which may occur when high historical beta factors overestimate the “true” beta, while low historical beta factors underestimate “true” beta. This method can be traced back to an auto-regressive adjustment method originally developed by Blume in order to correct distortions in historical data (Blume, On the Assessment of Risk, The Journal of Finance, Vol. 26, March 1971, p. 8).

Some other studies in this regard also conclude that adjustment-based methods like the Blume method are better at predicting beta factors than “naive” forecasts (e.g. Schmid/Wolf, Cost of Capital Estimation with Application to Workers Compensation Ratemaking, 2009; Gray/Hall/Bowman/Brailsford/Faff/Officer, The performance of alternative techniques for estimating equity betas of Australian firms, 2005; Zimmermann, Schätzung und Prognose von Betawerten, 1997, pp. 251 et seq.).

-90-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Although various ranges of potential adjustment factors are indicated in those studies, the aforementioned ratio of one third to two thirds has proven itself in practice and has established itself insofar as such adjustments are performed at all.

However, a more recent publication (Echerling/Eierle, Mean reversion adjusted betas used in business valuation practice: a research note, 2014) comes to a different conclusion.

In the present case, the Valuation Expert did not choose the adjusted beta method, but instead used raw beta.

To our knowledge, no conclusive majority opinion has formed in the literature and case law with respect to the use of “raw” or “adjusted” betas. Therefore, both methods are applied in practice.

To examine this question, we have performed a statistical analysis of a large number of corporate restructuring measures involving compensation payments. We have concluded that neither method is predominant, and that no trend is evident towards the use of any one of the two methods.

In view of the above statements, it may be stated, in summary, that use of the “raw beta” to estimate future entrepreneurial risk for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf is not objectionable, especially since this question is hardly relevant in the present case, with a beta factor near the market average.

Unlevering and Relevering

In analyzing the values which are determined in this manner, it must also be ensured that the beta factors obtained in the capital market reflect both the company’s operating risk and its individual capital structure risk.

According to the prevailing view, it is generally assumed that a high leverage ratio is generally associated with high financial risk to capital, and therefore carries with it higher risk premiums (for capital). Therefore, in order to make the other companies (“peers”) comparable with the Valuation Object, the beta factors are typically adjusted for the individual capital structure risk (“unlevering”) and then adapted to the capital structure risk of the Valuation Object (“relevering”). In some cases, it is necessary to adjust the beta factor over time to adapt changes in the capital structure.

-91-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

When it comes to calculating the “beta debt,” it is often assumed by valuation practitioners that lenders will assume a portion of the operating risk and in return will demand a higher rate of return, i.e. a risk premium. As risk is assumed by the lenders, the residual risk assumed by the shareholders is diminished, so that the risk premium demanded by investors decreases accordingly.

This method for conversion of the beta factors was applied in the present case.

We deem use of the beta debt approach to be appropriate in light of the assumptions made by the Valuation Expert.

Wincor Nixdorf’s Original Beta Factor

For publicly traded companies, it is generally possible to derive beta factors from share prices directly by relying on historical returns.

In many cases, however, these returns are affected by specific events or factors and therefore do not appropriately reflect entrepreneurial risk. Distortions in the rate of return for equities could arise when the price of the shares be-comes decoupled from the market trend as a result of takeover offers, speculation or the narrowness of the market.

As a publicly traded company, beta factors are observable in the capital market for Wincor Nixdorf. Accordingly, the Valuation Expert calculated the beta factor for Wincor Nixdorf using CIQ data and subjected it to further analysis. As of 27 July 2016, a beta factor of 0.95 was determined for the company over a period of five years based on monthly regressions against the CDAX. Regression against the MSCI World Index produces a value of 1.26.

Although current analyses of the liquidity of Wincor Nixdorf shares based on trading volume and “bid/ask spreads” have returned typical values, the Valuation Expert takes the view that the possibility that Wincor Nixdorf share prices are distorted and not determined entirely by actual company risk cannot be ruled out. Accordingly, the Valuation Expert derived a beta factor using an alternative method, based on a peer group comparison. The beta factor determined for Wincor Nixdorf shares was then subjected to additional checks by the Valuation Expert in order to ascertain plausibility.

-92-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

We have also analyzed the trading data for Wincor Nixdorf shares and our findings were no different. We furthermore deem the method of checking the plausibility of the beta factor derived based on the peer group comparison using the beta factor derived for Wincor Nixdorf shares to be appropriate.

Formation of a peer group

Insofar as a beta factor cannot be determined, because the company’s shares are not publicly traded or if the historical beta factor of the Valuation Object cannot be used for derivation of the future beta factor, it is absolutely necessary, in applying the CAPM, to identify comparable companies with respect to risk for which relevant beta factors can be determined.

Since other companies are not comparable in every respect, valuation practitioners generally try to include several companies from the relevant sector in the examination in order to account for the fact that individual companies may not be fully comparable with the Valuation Object through the calculation of averag values. This method is also based on the principle that the risks and opportunities of comparable publicly traded companies within the same sector will tend to converge over time, so that those companies are largely comparable to the future circumstances of the Valuation Object.

In its Order of 27 May 2009 (Case No. I-26 W 5/07), making reference to a judgment by the Higher Regional Court of Celle (19 April 2007, Case No. 9 W 53/06, AG 2007, p. 865), the Higher Regional Court of Dusseldorf refers to the reference group method as a “legitimate method” for determining beta factor.

In forming the peer group, the Valuation Expert selected companies with risks and opportunities that are largely comparable to those of the Valuation Object, and for which historical trading data is available in an adequate scope and quality.

In order to determine suitable peer group companies, the Valuation Expert selected possible candidates from a CIQ industry survey, taking into account additional research and analyses based on publicly available information, supplemented by information provided by Wincor Nixdorf management.

-93-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The method for determining the peer group and the qualitative and quantitative filters which were employed in order to gradually convert the “long list” into a “short list” are presented in the Valuation Opinion.

Starting from a short list, the Valuation Expert analyzed the 15 potential peer group companies which had been identified with regard to adequate comparability with Wincor Nixdorf based on detailed descriptions of their operations, financial data and product segments. At the end of the process, the Valuation Expert was left with the two peer group companies described in the Valuation Opinion: NCR and Diebold Inc. Based on the analyses performed by the Valuation Expert, these companies offer the best possible comparison to Wincor Nixdorf with regard to operations and business risk and were therefore identified as the company’s “core peer group.”

As a plausibility check, the Valuation Expert supplemented this core peer group with an “extended peer group” to take into account the potential future development of Wincor Nixdorf, particularly with regard to the fast-growing AEVI business. The long list was generated by the Valuation Expert based on the market and industry studies (eleven) of relevance for Wincor Nixdorf, analyst reports (nine) and the most recent impairment test (six), in which some companies are mentioned multiple times. To winnow down this group into the short list, the Valuation Expert applied criteria which were also used for the core peer group. The four other companies mentioned in the Valuation Opinion were identified on this basis.

As a result of this screening process and additional analysis, as well as discussions with Wincor Nixdorf management, the Valuation Expert identified a core peer group consisting of the two companies most comparable to Wincor Nixdorf, as well as an extended peer group including four additional companies. The Valuation Expert points out that the extended peer group does not reflect the aggregate risk profile of Wincor Nixdorf better than the core peer group. Rather, the weight of Wincor Nixdorf’s individual business units is not adequately reflected by taking the averages of these six companies.

-94-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

We were able to follow the methodology employed by the Valuation Expert in identifying peer group companies and, particularly for excluding potential peers using the criteria cited, and we deem the mode of procedure followed to be appropriate. We deem the Valuation Expert’s assessment with regard to the differing degree of comparability of the core peer group companies and the companies included in the extended peer group to be accurate.

In the course of our research with CIQ, we were unable to identify any other potential peer group company which reflects the risk of Wincor Nixdorf as well or better than the companies in the peer groups created by the Valuation Expert.

All the peer group companies are based abroad. The selection of peer group companies whose registered office and/or stock exchange listing is in a country different than that of the Valuation Object often encounters objections to the effect that those companies are not adequately comparable.

In general, risk is affected not by the country in which a company is based or where its shares are listed for trading, but e.g. by the geographical focus of its operations. This criterion was kept in mind in the selection of peer group companies.

The selected methodology, with respect to the use of foreign companies as well, is deemed to be permissible by the courts (e.g. Higher Regional Court of Stuttgart, 3 April 2012, Case No. 20 W 7/09, 17 October 2011, Case No. 20 W 7/11 and 4 May 2011, Case No. 20 W 11/08; Frankfurt am Main, 5 March 2012, Case No. 21 W 11/11; Higher Regional Court of Celle, 19 April 2007, Case No. 9 W 53/06).

In summary, we deem the mode of procedure in the selection of companies for the core peer group to be adequate. We have no objections to the derivation of the peer group companies described in the Valuation Opinion, taking into account the plausibility check using the extended peer group.

Beta factor based on the chosen peer group

Ultimately, the Valuation Expert derived the levered five-year beta factors for the two peer groups using the methods derived above, based on raw beta, using monthly regression against the broadest possible most commonly used national index and against the international MSCI World Index, to arrive at values as of 27 July 2016.

-95-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The Valuation Expert entered the individual levered and unlevered beta factors determined for each per group company into tables for the core peer group and extended peer group and calculated the arithmetic mean in each case.

The unlevered beta factors for the core peer group range from 1.13 (global index) to 1.24 (local index), which is within the range of the unlevered original beta factor, which was used to check the plausibility of the calculation, and which ranges from 0.95 (local index) to 1.26 (global index).

The Valuation Expert deems the use of an unlevered beta factor at the lower end of the core peer group range, rounding out to 1.1, to be adequate for an estimation of Wincor Nixdorf’s operating risk.

The unlevered beta factors for the extended peer group range from 0.99 (global index) to 1.14 (local index), also within the range of the unlevered original beta factors. In conclusion, the beta factor of 1.1 which was used for the purposes of the valuation lies within the extended peer group range, which was used as a plausibility check.

To determine the risk premium to be used for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf, the Valuation Expert adjusted the unlevered beta factor in a period-specific manner in order to account for changes in capital structure, arriving at values between 1.28 (2016/17) and 1.31 (2017/18). The result was an unlevered beta factor of 1.23 for Wincor Nixdorf in the terminal value phase.

The conversion of the unlevered beta factor of 1.1 into period-specific levered beta factors based on the mode of procedure presented was performed in a methodologically adequate and mathematically accurate fashion.

Our verification of these values, which was performed in the form of queries (CIQ and Bloomberg), did not lead to any objections. Other calculation methods (different intervals), using the parameters used by the Valuation Expert, result in beta factors ranging from 1.0 to 1.2.

-96-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Taking into account Wincor Nixdorf’s business model, we deem the beta factor chosen for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf to be adequate, keeping in mind that the market risk premium used for the valuation continues to be in the middle of the range recommended by the Valuation Committee in the current market environment.

c) Terminal Growth Rate

Future growth in net income results in part from retained earnings and their reinvestment within the company and, in part, arises organically due to price, volume and structural effects.

In the Detailed Forecast Period, potential growth is included in the company forecast and therefore in the net financial surpluses, the individual components of which are forecast as nominal values. A terminal growth rate is therefore unnecessary for this period.

In the perpetual annuity phase as well, the balance sheet and income statement items continue to change, as does the net cash flow to shareholders. This perpetual growth is essentially reflected by the terminal growth rate in the discount rate calculation.

Retained earnings and sums notionally attributable to shareholders in the perpetual annuity phase represent a substantial percentage of future growth. This growth as a result of retained earnings could also be represented in equivalent value by discounting additional distributions which are generated by retained earnings.

Assuming that Wincor Nixdorf permanently earns the cost of capital reflecting its risk and financing structure, the future growth in distributions corresponds directly with the value contribution of increases in value as a result of retained earnings. Accordingly, the majority of future operational growth, financed through retained earnings, is already taken into account through the direct attribution of the value contribution of increases in value.

Addition growth potential, e.g. temporary additional growth effects which are based on temporarily attainable excess returns as a result of specific market and industry conditions or specific features of the company, as well as inflation-related growth effects, are to be taken into account in the systematic procedure which has been presented for determining the terminal growth rate.

-97-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

In deriving the terminal growth rate, the Valuation Expert differentiates between the various business segments. In accordance with the Valuation Expert’s findings, the hardware business is already characterized by intense competition and price pressure, so that the most the company can hope or expect is that a stable price level will be established in the future, provided the company’s is innovative enough to compensate for the drop in prices. In the software and service business, on the other hand, prices tend to more stable, and price changes should remain within the bounds of the inflation rate for the economy as a whole.

With due regard for current economic data, Wincor Nixdorf’s foreign operations, which are subject to possible exchange rate effects, and the assumptions with regard to derivation of the risk-free rate, the Valuation Expert considers a terminal growth rate of 0.75% for the financial years starting in 2018/19 to be adequate.

We find the considerations presented by the Valuation Expert to be plausible and also point out that the Valuation Expert uses a terminal growth rate of 0.75% (growth in net cash flows) as well as a future inflation-driven revenue terminal growth rate of 0.75%. This implies that the company’s expenses will also go up by 0.75%. With factor prices increasing by more than 0.75%, a parallel development of revenues and earnings is possible only if improvements in efficiency compensate for the rising costs.

Empirical studies with regard to the earnings growth of German companies have shown that average earnings growth due to retained earnings is about one half the general inflation rate. On this basis, and with due regard for current inflation expectations, a future terminal growth rate of well under 1.0% can be derived, adjusted for retained earnings.

Insofar as it is argued in some parts of the literature that the (average) earnings growth of German companies should be set significantly higher based on statistical analysis, these sources generally fail to recognize the link described above between retained earnings and associated increases in value.

-98-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

However, when comparing the terminal growth rates used in business valuations against the companies’ statistically determined earnings terminal growth rates, it should be kept in mind that, in practice, companies routinely used retained earnings for investments in their operations. These investments, in turn, increase the value of future earnings. Accordingly, empirically determined earnings growth includes both inflation-driven earnings growth and earnings growth which is due to retained earnings.

In the discounted cash flow method, net cash flows in the perpetual annuity phase are comprised of earnings distributions/dividends and the value contribution of increases in value. Since the valuation contribution of increases in value fully accounts for future dividend growth from retained earnings, the growth in earnings distributions/dividends reflected in the terminal growth rate largely reflects inflation-related value effects which are attributable to the company-specific inflation rate of the company for which the valuation is being performed.

In the present valuation, the 0.75% terminal growth rate corresponds, in the context described by Tschöpel/Wiese/Willershausen (Unternehmensbewertung und Wachstum bei Inflation, persönlicher Besteuerung und Verschuldung, WPg 2010, pp. 349 et seq. and 405 et seq.), to

w = (1 - q) * ^RvSt + q * p with

w = overall terminal growth rate

q = distribution rate

^RvSt = levered cost of capital before income taxes

p = company-specific inflation rate

to a perpetual earnings terminal growth rate of around 4.9% for Wincor Nixdorf.

The described impact of growth based on retained earnings is empirically established in a recent article by Schieszl/Bachmann/Amann [Peemöller (editor), Praxishandbuch der Unternehmensbewertung, 6th ed., 2015, Chapter 3, Part G: Das Wachstum der finanziellen Überschüsse in der Unternehmensbewertung – Eine empirisch gestützte Bestandaufnahme] based on time series extending to the recent past.

-99-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

It should also be stated with regard to the 0.75% terminal growth rate used in the valuation that the terminal growth rates used by valuation practitioners and confirmed by the courts to this date typically range from 0.0% to 2.0%. An analysis of 42 decisions made in the recent past by six superior courts reveals nine cases with terminal growth rates of less than 1.0% (as low as 0%), 19 others with a terminal growth rate of exactly 1.0% and 14 cases with terminal growth rates of higher than 1.0% (and as high as 2.0%).

Accordingly, the terminal growth rate used in the present case is within the range of the cases underlying these decisions. It should also be kept in mind that these decisions were made on valuation dates on which inflation and interest rates were higher, in some cases by a significant margin. In view of current inflation and interest rates, which are not expected to increase substantially in the short and medium terms, it is to be expected that terminal growth rates of well under 1.0% will no longer be regarded as exceptional cases by the courts in the future.

Based on the considerations presented, in summary, we deem the terminal growth rate used in the present valuation to be adequate.

d) Overview of Discount Rate

The discount rate, which was derived by the Valuation Expert in a methodologically correct and mathematically accurate manner, is determined as follows, in summary:

Wincor Nixdorf: Discount Rate	2015/16			2016/17			2017/18			2018/19			2019/20 ff.
Risk-free rate before personal taxes		0.70	%		0.70	%		0.70	%		0.70	%		0.70	%
Risk-free rate after personal taxes		0.52	%		0.52	%		0.52	%		0.52	%		0.52	%
Market risk premium after personal taxes		5.50	%		5.50	%		5.50	%		5.50	%		5.50	%
Levered beta factor		1.29			1.28			1.31			1.29			1.23
Risk premium after personal taxes		7.08	%		7.05	%		7.18	%		7.07	%		6.79	%
Cost of capital after personal taxes		7.60	%		7.56	%		7.70	%		7.59	%		7.30	%
Terminal growth rate														-0.75	%
Discount rate after personal taxes		7.60	%		7.56	%		7.70	%		7.59	%		6.55	%

-100-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

6. Separate Assets

Wincor Nixdorf reportedly does not have a significant amount of non-core assets. In the course of the valuation, the Valuation Expert did not identify any non-core assets which are to be attributed to the earning value of core assets or which are to be recognized as separate assets for reasons of presentation.

We did not identify any non-core assets over the course of our audit which are to be attributed to the earning value of core assets, or which are to be recognized as separate assets for reasons of presentation.

7. Valuation and Value Per Share

The Valuation Expert calculated the earnings value of Wincor Nixdorf’s operations in a mathematically accurate fashion as of the date of the Wincor Nixdorf GM at which the resolution was adopted (the Valuation Date), as € 1.591 million. This value is comprised of a dividend value of € 795 million and € 796 million in retained earnings in the perpetual annuity.

Given the number of shares in circulation (29,816,211), the value per share of Wincor Nixdorf is € 53.34.

No particular difficulties arose in the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf.

8. Scenarios with Altered Interest Rates

In view of the enduring low interest rates and the possibility that interest rates will change, we cannot rule out the possibility, at the conclusion of our review, that a risk-free rate differing from the one derived with the method presented above could arise during the period between conclusion of the review and the date on which the resolution is adopted by the Wincor Nixdorf GM, corresponding to the Valuation Date.

For these cases of increases or decreases in risk-free rates, rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent in accordance with the Valuation Committee’s recent recommendation of 13 July 2016 prior to the GM, the Valuation Expert has carefully determined and presented the resulting values per share (before personal taxes). In doing so, he assumed for the sake of simplicity that all other valuation parameters and methods would remain unchanged. Based on his calculations, to which we have no objection, the valuation and value per share of Wincor Nixdorf are as follows:

-101-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Wincor Nixdorf: scenario analysis Valuation and cash compensation	Valuation		Cash compensation
Risk-free rate before personal taxes		€ million		€/share
0.4%		1,666		55.89
0.5%		1,640		55.02
0.6%		1,615		54.17
0.7%		1,591		53.34
0.8%		1,567		52.54
0.9%		1,543		51.75

9. Sensitivity Analysis

In light of the review as to whether the intrinsic value of Wincor Nixdorf derived based on the earnings value method might be higher than the determined cash compensation, we have performed sensitivity analyses with regard to two key parameters of the valuation.

Since there a positive relationship between company growth and company risk, at least in the long term, these valuation parameters are varied higher and lower in the table below relative to the figures used in the valuation and various combinations are compared.

-102-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The table below shows how different combinations of terminal growth rates and beta factors can affect the value per share of Wincor Nixdorf:

Wincor Nixdorf: value per share in Euros		Terminal growth rate
			0.25	%	0.50	%	0.75	%	1.00	%	1.25	%
	1.00		54.97		57.44		60.16		63.14		66.43
	1.05		51.92		54.15		56.58		59.24		62.16
Unlevered beta factor	1.10		49.14		51.16		53.34		55.73		58.34
	1.15		46.59		48.42		50.40		52.55		54.89
	1.20		44.25		45.91		47.71		49.65		51.76

The values per share resulting from variations in these parameters range from € 44.25 to € 66.43. Taking into account the aforementioned connection between company growth and company risk, and examining only combinations in which the figures move in the same direction, the range of possible values per share is smaller, from € 51.76 to € 54.97.

10. Plausibility of the Valuation

The plausibility of the (fundamental) valuation of Wincor Nixdorf, which was determined in accordance with the earnings value method, i.e. decidedly on the basis of internal information and business management principles, was checked by means of a comparative valuation based on public capital market data (“trading multiples”). The Valuation Expert dispensed with the use of “transaction multiples” due to the fact that the meaningfulness of such multiples is generally limited as a result of the high degree of subjective factors. Trading multiples were derived by the Valuation Expert based on the extended peer group, which was also used to check the plausibility of the beta factor.

For the comparative valuation, the Valuation Expert determined multipliers based on the ratio of overall valuation to the EBITDA and EBIT of the individual companies. The multipliers were calculated based on analyst estimates of EBITDA and EBIT for Financial Year 2017, which were provided by CIQ. For subsequent financial years, estimates were not available in sufficient quantities.

In order to ensure that the projected EBITDA and EBIT of the peer group companies are comparable with those of Wincor Nixdorf, the Valuation Expert used the forecast values for Wincor Nixdorf from Financial Year 2016/17. For the calculation of net debt, for the purposes of converting the overall valuation into the market value of the company’s capital, the Valuation Expert used the actual data of Wincor Nixdorf as of 30 June 2016.

-103-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

The market value of Wincor Nixdorf’s capital calculated based on the EBITDA multiples of the extended peer group for the upper and lower quartiles ranges from € 1,389 million to € 1,845 million. This places the enterprise value, which was determined using the earnings value method, by analyzing the fundamentals of the company (capital value), in the middle of the range presented.

The market value of Wincor Nixdorf’s capital calculated based on the EBIT multiples of the extended peer group for the upper and lower quartiles ranges from € 1,452 million to € 1,689 million. This places the enterprise value, which was determined using the earnings value method, by analyzing the fundamentals of the company (capital value), also in the middle of the range presented.

We were able to follow compilation of the peer group and the selection and calculation of the multiples both substantively and mathematically. In doing so, we used the “consensus estimates” of CIQ. We were able to confirm the Valuation Expert’s results.

We consider the mode of procedure for determination of the comparative valuation to be essentially appropriate and adequate. In accordance with the Valuation Expert’s findings in the present case, which we share, the comparative market valuation furnishes no reason to suspect that the valuation determined using the earnings value method is inaccurate or that the underlying forecasts are overly conservative.

Moreover, a comparison of the valuation per share (€53.34) with the total value of the consideration offered by the principal shareholder as part of the voluntary public takeover offer of 5 February 2016 to the shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf (€52.50) does not indicate that the valuation is inadequate in terms of the German Stock Corporation Act.

In summary, it can be stated that the plausibility checks which have been performed give no indication that the present valuation is inadequate in terms of the Stock Corporation Act.

-104-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

11. Comparison with Liquidation Value

The Valuation Expert made an approximate determination as to whether the liquidation of Wincor Nixdorf would yield net proceeds in excess of its earnings value. The associated considerations and calculations are described in the Valuation Opinion. The Valuation Expert dispenses with a presentation of these calculations in the Valuation Opinion since he concludes that the approximate liquidation value is well below the going concern value so that the liquidation value has no independent significance for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf and derivation of the company’s value per share.

We have verified these considerations and can confirm the result.

12. Comparison with Share Price

In view of the rulings issued by the Federal Constitutional Court (Order of 27 April 1999, Case No. 1 BvR 1613/94, BVerfGE 100, 289 et seq.), Wincor Nixdorf’s share price is generally a suitable reference value for determination of the market value of the shares.

Accordingly, the valuation also confronts the question as to whether the share price of Wincor Nixdorf is to be taken into account when determining the cash compensation which is to be paid to the minority shareholders.

In an Order dated 19 July 2010, the Federal Supreme Court elaborated upon its earlier rulings with respect to the rules for determining the valid share price. Accordingly, adequate compensation must generally be based on the volume-weighted average price within a three-month reference period before the restructuring was announced. If an extended period of time elapses between the announcement of the restructuring program and the date of the general meeting and if it appears based on the change in the share price during that period that an adjustment would be appropriate, the share price is to be projected forward based on the performance of the general market or sector, with due regard for the performance of the shares since that time (Order of 19 July 2010, Case No. II ZB 18/09). 19 July 2010, Case No. II ZB 18/09, repeated in the Order of 28 June 2011, Case No. II ZB 15/00).

-105-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Since the joint public announcement by Diebold Inc. and Diebold KGaA of the plan to conclude a domination and profit and loss transfer agreement between Wincor Nixdorf, as the controlled company, and Diebold KGaA, as the controlling company, pursuant to §§ 291(1) of the German Stock Corporation Act was made on 8 July 2013, so that, in the view of KPMG, no extended period of time has passed within the meaning of the Federal Supreme Court’s case law, a reference period ending on 8 July 2013 was chosen for the purposes of the valuation. April 2016, so that, in the view of the Valuation Expert, no extended period of time has passed within the meaning of the Federal Supreme Court’s case law, a reference period ending on 7 April 2016 was chosen for the purposes of the valuation.

We deem the reference period which was chosen in the valuation to be appropriate based on the case law of the Federal Supreme Court. In particular, we agree with the related assessment that no extended period of time has passed within the meaning of the Order of 19 July 2010, which has been cited above.

However, there are strong arguments against using share price to derive the market value of the shares. In accordance with the findings of the Federal Supreme Court on 12 March 2001, (Case No. II ZB 15/00, BGHZ 147, 108 et seq.), for example, share price is not a valid source for the derivation of the shares’ market value in cases where no trading has taken place for ex-tended periods of time, if minority shareholders have been unable to sell their shares at the share price to the narrowness of the market or if the share price has been manipulated.

We share the Valuation Expert’s view that, because of the adequate number of free float shares, the fact that Wincor Nixdorf shares were traded on all trading days and the absence of price jumps by more than 5% on consecutive days, there is no reason to believe that shareholders were unable to sell their shares at the share price. There is also no evidence that the share price may have been manipulated.

The Valuation Expert asked for and was told the volume-weighted average share price of Wincor Nixdorf shares for the three-month period prior to publication of the ad-hoc notice of 8 April 2016 by the Federal Supervisory Office for Financial Services (BaFin) in Bonn and Frankfurt am Main. The Valuation Expert considers the price specified in the response, € 46.79 per share of Wincor Nixdorf, as the relevant lower limit for determination of the cash compensation. Based on our investigation, we can confirm this price.

-106-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

Accordingly, the average share price of Wincor Nixdorf determined in this manner is below the cash compensation of € 53.34 which was determined based on the earnings value method.

13. Adequacy of the Cash Compensation

The value per share of Wincor Nixdorf as of 26 September 2016, determined using the earnings method, is € 53.34 (see C.IV.7).

The average share price of Wincor Nixdorf is below the cash compensation determined based on the earnings value method, in the amount of € 53.34.

The cash compensation was therefore set at € 53.34 per share.

In summary, based on our audit, we deem this cash compensation to be adequate.

If, in the time between the conclusion of our audit of the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement (16 August 2016) and the scheduled date for adoption of the resolution by the shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf concerning conclusion of the agreement (26 September 2016), substantial changes should arise in the financial, earnings and liquidity position of Wincor Nixdorf or other factors underlying the valuation, these changes are to be taken into account in the determination of the cash compensation, especially insofar as these changes result in a value per share which is at present higher than the proposed cash compensation.

-107-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

V. Adequacy of the Recurring Compensation

1. Calculation Method

The recurring compensation was determined based on the valuation of 26 September 2016, which PwC performed in accordance with the earnings value method pursuant to the IDW S 1 standard (€ 1,591 million). Our findings with regard to the methods applied for determination of the cash compensation and the valuation (see C.II through C.IV) apply for our audit as to the adequacy of the recurring compensation as well.

Pursuant to § 304 (2) Sentence 1 of the German Stock Corporation Act, an annual settlement is to be guaranteed amounting at least to the average share of earnings which can be distributed to each individual share based on the company’s current earnings position and future earnings outlook, taking into account adequate depreciation and allowances, but without other earnings reserves. This statutory rule ensures that minority shareholders will receive a recurring compensation of the value which conforms to the average earnings share they would receive if not for the company agreement.

Pursuant to § 4(2) of the control and profit and loss absorption agreement, Diebold KGaA guarantees the minority shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf payment of a gross profit share amounting to € 3.17 for each bearer share of Wincor Nixdorf, with a mathematical share in the capital stock of € 1.00, for each full financial year as an adequate recurring compensation, minus any corporate tax and solidarity surcharge accruing at the applicable tax rate for that year. Based on the circumstances as of the conclusion of the agreement, a net recurring compensation of € 2.85 per share is guaranteed.

As explained in the Valuation Opinion, the recurring compensation was derived from the objectified valuation as an annuity in accordance with the rulings of the Federal Supreme Court.

In performing the valuation, retained earnings were set in the updated Detailed Forecast Period and retained earnings were notionally attributed in the perpetual annuity phase. This mode of procedure, which was selected for reasons having to do with the valuation methodology, dos not necessarily involve the formation of other earnings reserves. In particular, this mode of procedure does not preclude derivation of the recurring compensation from the enterprise value, given that increases in capital will strengthen the capital base in later years and the retention of earnings therefore does not represent a decrease in the average profit share available for distribution.

-108-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

We deem the fundamental method selected by the Valuation Expert of deriving the annual compensation from the valuation and from the net cash flows underlying the valuation, to be appropriate.

2. Annuity Rate

In converting the valuation into an annuity, the Valuation Expert used a risk-adjusted interest rate of an equivalent term. As is typically the case in valuation practice, this was determined as the sum of a risk-free rate and a risk premium of equivalent present value, after deducting personal taxes.

In the present case, the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement was concluded for an unlimited term. For this reason, the risk-free rate which was used for the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf (0.70% before personal taxes and 0.52% after personal taxes) was also used by the Valuation Expert as the risk-free rate for the annuity.

For the purposes of the annuity, the Valuation Expert applied the method typically used by valuation practitioners: using half of the risk premium used for the valuation for the purposes of determining the annuity. Period-specific risk premiums are used in the valuation of Wincor Nixdorf. In order to arrive at a single risk premium for a fixed recurring compensation, the Valuation Expert determined the present value of the risk premium after personal taxes (6.84%). Half of this rate (3.42%) was used.

The Valuation Expert determines the annuity factor as follows:

Wincor Nixdorf AG: annuity factor
Risk-free rate after personal taxes	0.52	%
Half the present value-equivalent of the risk premium after personal taxes	3.42	%
Annuity factor	3.93	%

This mode of procedure is justified in our view and is therefore not objectionable. We were able to reconcile the starting values necessary for determination of the annuity rate and to check the plausibility of this rate based on capital market data, and we were able to reproduce the mathematical derivation of the rate without objections.

-109-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

3. Consideration of Corporate Tax and Earnings

With respect to the recurring compensation, the Federal Supreme Court ruled in the Order cited by the Valuation Expert that, contrary to the typical practice to date, minority shareholders were to be guaranteed as a settlement in terms of § 304 (1) Sentence 1 (2) Sentence 1 of the Stock Corporation Act, the average gross earnings per share expected to be available for distribution minus the corporate tax owed by the company on this distribution, in the applicable tax rate, as a fixed payment.

The company’s “earned income” in this regard are its pre-tax earnings. Adjustments in corporate taxes result in corresponding adjustments to the recurring compensation, since the Federal Supreme Court takes the view that the company itself is unable to control its corporate tax burden. This ruling is criticized in the literature to the effect that it violates the valuation date principle for business valuations with regard to the corporate tax rate alone, despite the fact that there is no systematic reason why German corporate tax should be treated differently than foreign income taxes or German trade tax.

In the view of the Federal Supreme Court, the mode of procedure described above does not violate the valuation date principle because the amount of the recurring compensation, the average gross earnings available for distribution, is derived based on the objectified valuation of the company, which is performed based largely on the economic and legal structures existing on the valuation date.

According to the calculations of the Valuation Expert, the adequate recurring compensation called for in the agreement amounts to € 2.85 per share. Without deducting corporate tax and solidarity surcharge, the gross recurring compensation payment amounts to € 3.17 per share.

In summary, based on our audit, we deem this recurring compensation to be adequate.

If corporate tax rates or the solidarity surcharge change in the future, the net recurring compensation would be revised accordingly consistent with § 4(2) of the control and profit and loss absorption agreement.

-110-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

This mode of procedure is appropriate in view of the rulings of the Federal Supreme Court.

If, in the time between the conclusion of our audit as to the adequacy of the recurring compensation (16 August 2016) and the scheduled date for adoption of the resolution by the shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf concerning conclusion of the agreement (26 September 2016), substantial changes should arise in the financial, earnings and liquidity position of Wincor Nixdorf or other factors underlying the valuation, these changes are to be taken into account in the determination of the recurring compensation especially insofar as these changes result in a value per share which is higher at present than the proposed recurring compensation.

4. Scenarios with Altered Interest Rates

Similar to the mode of procedure used for derivation of the cash compensation, the Valuation Expert has carefully determined and presented the net recurring compensation per share which would result for the rounded risk-free rates (before personal taxes) based on the possibility that interest rates will change in the period of time between the signing of the Valuation Opinion/the cessation of our audit and the Valuation Date. Based on his calculations, to which we have no objection, the net and gross recurring compensation per share, as well as the parameters of their calculation, are as follows:

Wincor Nixdorf: Scenario analysis Recurring compensation	Valuation		Annuity rate		Net settlement		Gross, including corporation tax		Corporate tax		Gross settlement
Risk-free rate before personal taxes		€/share		%		€/share		€/share		€/share		€/share
0.4%		55.89		3.69		2.80		1.95		0.31		3.11
0.5%		55.02		3.77		2.82		1.97		0.31		3.13
0.6%		54.17		3.85		2.83		1.98		0.31		3.15
0.7%		53.34		3.93		2.85		1.99		0.32		3.17
0.8%		52.54		4.02		2.87		2.01		0.32		3.18
0.9%		51.75		4.1		2.88		2.02		0.32		3.20

-111-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

5. Sensitivity Analysis

The table below shows how different combinations of terminal growth rates and beta factor affect the net recurring compensation, similar to our mode of procedure in C.IV.4.9:

Wincor Nixdorf: net recurring compensation per share in EUR		Terminal growth rate
			0.25	%	0.50	%	0.75	%	1.00	%	1.25	%
	1.00		2.70		2.81		2.93		3.06		3.20
	1.05		2.69		2.79		2.89		3.01		3.14
Beta factor	1.10		2.65		2.75		2.85		2.96		3.09
	1.15		2.63		2.72		2.82		2.92		3.04
	1.20		2.61		2.69		2.78		2.89		2.99

The net recurring compensation per share resulting from variations in these parameters range from € 2.61 to € 3.20. Keeping in mind that there is a positive relationship between company growth and company risk, at least in the long term, and taking into account only combinations in which the two figures move in the same direction, the range of net recurring compensation per share is more limited, from € 2.70 to € 2.99.

-112-

Wincor Nixdorf Aktiengesellschaft, Paderborn Report on the Audit of the Domination and Profit and Loss Transfer Agreement

D. Final Declaration

As court-appointed auditors, we have audited the final draft of the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement between Diebold and Wincor Nixorf. We find that the agreement conforms to statutory requirements.

With regard to the adequacy of the cash compensation and recurring compensation, we hereby issue the following final declaration pursuant to § 293e of the German Stock Corporation Act:

“In accordance with our findings, for the reasons explained, a net recurring compensation for the minority shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG in the amount of € 2.85 per share of Wincor Nixdorf AG for each complete financial year, and the cash compensation provided, under which the minority shareholders of Wincor Nixdorf AG will receive a cash compensation of € 53.34 per share in their company, are adequate.” We judge the provision in the final draft of the domination and profit and loss transfer agreement under which the recurring compensation is to be determined as a fixed gross total of € 3.17 per share of Wincor Nixdorf AG minus corporate tax and solidarity surcharge based on the tax rates in effect for the relevant year, to be adequate in light of the Federal Supreme Court’s decision in Case No. II ZB 17/01 of 21 July 2003.”

Dusseldorf, 16 August 2016

ADKL AG

Wirtschaftsprüfungsgesellschaft

Wolfram Wagner	p.p. Ulrich Kühnen
Auditor	Auditor

-113-