e10vq

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

Form 10-Q


(X)		QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2010


( )		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ........ to .......

Commission file number 1-4879

Diebold, Incorporated

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Ohio		34-0183970

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)		(IRS Employer Identification Number)

5995 Mayfair Road, PO Box 3077, North Canton, Ohio		44720-8077

(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (330) 490-4000

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large Accelerated Filer þ	Accelerated Filer o	Non-Accelerated Filer o	Smaller Reporting Company o
		(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $1.25 Par Value – 65,679,549 shares as of October 29, 2010

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)


	September 30,			December 31,
	2010			2009
ASSETS	(Unaudited)
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	239,823		$	328,426
Short-term investments		195,454			177,442
Trade receivables, less allowances for doubtful accounts of $24,975 and $26,648, respectively		434,910			330,982
Inventories		484,829			448,243
Deferred income taxes		86,431			84,950
Prepaid expenses		29,295			36,874
Refundable income taxes		19,438			93,907
Other current assets		122,915			87,261

Total current assets		1,613,095			1,588,085


Securities and other investments		74,242			73,989
Property, plant and equipment, at cost		633,507			613,377
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization		432,384			408,557

Property, plant and equipment, net		201,123			204,820
Deferred income taxes		34,667			32,834
Goodwill		447,376			450,937
Other assets		219,839			204,200

Total assets	$	2,590,342		$	2,554,865


LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current liabilities
Notes payable	$	611		$	16,915
Accounts payable		176,689			147,496
Deferred revenue		165,879			198,989
Other current liabilities		335,241			379,691

Total current liabilities		678,420			743,091


Long-term debt		607,781			553,008
Pensions and other benefits		76,871			90,021
Postretirement and other benefits		23,353			29,174
Deferred income taxes		44,836			45,060
Other long-term liabilities		25,560			22,485

Commitments and contingencies		-			-

Equity
Diebold, Incorporated shareholders’ equity
Preferred shares, no par value, 1,000,000 authorized shares, none issued		-			-
Common shares, 125,000,000 authorized shares, 76,307,156 and 76,093,101 issued shares, 65,690,022 and 66,327,627 outstanding shares, respectively		95,384			95,116
Additional capital		305,778			290,689
Retained earnings		1,057,219			1,011,448
Treasury shares, at cost, 10,617,134 and 9,765,474 shares, respectively		(434,939	)		(410,153	)
Accumulated other comprehensive income		82,970			59,279

Total Diebold, Incorporated shareholders’ equity		1,106,412			1,046,379
Noncontrolling interests		27,109			25,647

Total equity		1,133,521			1,072,026

Total liabilities and equity	$	2,590,342		$	2,554,865

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(Unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share amounts)


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net sales
Products	$	371,596		$	279,205		$	928,225		$	903,013
Services		377,024			366,017			1,104,574			1,090,356

		748,620			645,222			2,032,799			1,993,369

Cost of sales
Products		279,742			219,570			693,761			689,139
Services		274,984			273,443			808,990			830,784

		554,726			493,013			1,502,751			1,519,923

Gross profit		193,894			152,209			530,048			473,446
Selling and administrative expense		119,425			103,624			329,193			300,989
Research, development and engineering expense		19,090			17,415			53,940			50,203
Impairment of assets		3,000			-			7,096			-

		141,515			121,039			390,229			351,192

Operating profit		52,379			31,170			139,819			122,254
Other income (expense)
Investment income		10,487			8,344			23,976			21,171
Interest expense		(9,631	)		(8,223	)		(27,987	)		(25,968	)
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net		5,428			(1,260	)		234			(3,058	)
Miscellaneous, net		1,915			(709	)		4,016			(24,095	)

Income from continuing operations before taxes		60,578			29,322			140,058			90,304
Taxes on income		15,144			4,085			38,359			20,957

Income from continuing operations		45,434			25,237			101,699			69,347
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		2,043			(203	)		390			(8,842	)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax		-			(31,438	)		-			(31,438	)

Net income (loss)		47,477			(6,404	)		102,089			29,067
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		1,372			751			2,329			4,144

Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	46,105		$	(7,155	)	$	99,760		$	24,923


Basic weighted-average shares outstanding		65,705			66,279			65,982			66,236
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding		66,421			66,951			66,569			66,810

Basic earnings per share
Net income from continuing operations	$	0.67		$	0.37		$	1.50		$	0.99
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		0.03			(0.48	)		0.01			(0.61	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	0.70		$	(0.11	)	$	1.51		$	0.38


Diluted earnings per share
Net income from continuing operations	$	0.66		$	0.37		$	1.49		$	0.98
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		0.03			(0.48	)		0.01			(0.61	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	0.69		$	(0.11	)	$	1.50		$	0.37


Amounts attributable to Diebold, Incorporated
Income from continuing operations, net of tax	$	44,062		$	24,486		$	99,370		$	65,203
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		2,043			(31,641	)		390			(40,280	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	46,105		$	(7,155	)	$	99,760		$	24,923

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
(in thousands)


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009
Cash flow from operating activities:
Net income	$	102,089		$	29,067
Adjustments to reconcile net income to cash provided by operating activities:
Loss on sale of discontinued operations		-			31,438
Depreciation and amortization		59,242			55,183
Share-based compensation		9,424			8,898
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		(295	)		(254	)
Deferred income taxes		(3,962	)		(1,159	)
Devaluation of Venezuelan balance sheet		5,148			-
Impairment of assets		7,096			-
Gain on sale of assets, net		(511	)		-
Equity in earnings of an investee		(2,106	)		(1,720	)
Cash (used in) provided by changes in certain assets and liabilities:
Trade receivables		(99,647	)		88,697
Inventories		(37,213	)		28,538
Prepaid expenses		7,845			1,128
Refundable income taxes		74,468			2,167
Other current assets		(26,363	)		23,180
Accounts payable		28,977			(69,793	)
Deferred revenue		(28,777	)		(10,751	)
Certain other assets and liabilities		(44,342	)		(63,616	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		51,073			121,003

Cash flow from investing activities:
Proceeds from sale of discontinued operations		1,815			7,856
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash acquired		-			(5,364	)
Proceeds from maturities of investments		254,570			130,969
Proceeds from sale of investments		35,624			-
Payments for purchases of investments		(303,745	)		(157,034	)
Proceeds from sale of fixed assets		749			113
Capital expenditures		(37,991	)		(28,414	)
Purchases of finance receivables		(18,939	)		-
Increase in certain other assets		(17,614	)		(22,539	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(85,531	)		(74,413	)

Cash flow from financing activities:
Dividends paid		(53,989	)		(52,077	)
Debt borrowings		371,390			220,284
Debt repayments		(345,003	)		(253,232	)
Distribution of affiliates’ earnings to noncontrolling interest holders		(1,226	)		(539	)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation		295			254
Issuance of common shares		1,750			-
Repurchase of common shares		(23,431	)		-
Withholding taxes paid for employees’ share-based compensation		(1,355	)		(1,879	)

Net cash used in financing activities		(51,569	)		(87,189	)


Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(2,576	)		1,921

Decrease in cash and cash equivalents		(88,603	)		(38,678	)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the period		328,426			241,436

Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the period	$	239,823		$	202,758


Significant noncash items:
Finance receivables acquired	$	33,843		$	-
Liabilities assumed related to acquisition of finance receivables		20,861			-

See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE 1: CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements of Diebold, Incorporated and its subsidiaries (collectively, the Company) have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and therefore do not include all information and footnotes necessary for a fair presentation of financial position, results of operations and cash flows in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP); however, such information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments), which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods.

The condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes contained in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009. In addition, some of the Company’s statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q may involve risks and uncertainties that could significantly impact expected future results. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of results to be expected for the full year.

The Company has reclassified the presentation of certain prior-year information to conform to the current presentation. As discussed in Note 15, effective in the first quarter of 2010, the Company began management of its businesses on a geographic basis, changing from the previous model of sales channel segments. In order to align the Company’s external reporting of its financial results with this organizational change, the Company has modified its segment reporting and has reclassified prior period segment information to conform to the current period presentation of its segment information.

The Company’s Venezuelan operations consist of a fifty-percent owned subsidiary, which is consolidated. On January 8, 2010, the Venezuelan government announced the devaluation of its currency, the bolivar, and the establishment of a two-tier exchange structure. Subsequently, during May 2010, the Venezuelan government seized control of the parallel market, thereby creating a new government-controlled rate. Transitioning from the parallel rate to the new government-controlled rate did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. In the future, if the Company converts bolivares at a rate other than the new government-controlled rate, the Company may realize additional gains or losses that would be recorded in the statement of income.

The Company continues to work to remediate a control weakness in the area of application of accounting policies specific to multiple-deliverable arrangements. As part of remediation, during the third quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment to defer revenue previously recognized that was not in accordance with GAAP. The immaterial out-of-period adjustment was recorded within the Company’s operations in China, included in the Diebold International (DI) reporting segment. The adjustment decreased revenue related to multiple-deliverable contracts that included revenue which was contingent upon the installation of the equipment. This deferred revenue will be recognized upon completion of installation. The out-of-period adjustment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 represents a decrease in revenue of $18,688 and $19,822, respectively and a decrease to operating profit of $5,270 and $5,753, respectively.

The Company’s significant accounting policies as reported in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 were amended in the first quarter of 2010 upon the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13), and FASB ASU 2009-14, Certain Arrangements That Include Software Elements (ASU 2009-14). On January 1, 2010, the Company elected to early adopt ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. However, the adoption of ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 modifies the Company’s previously disclosed revenue recognition policy, which is presented below as revised. ASU 2009-14 amends software revenue recognition guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 985-605 Software — Revenue Recognition (ASC 985-605), to exclude from its scope the Company’s tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver a product’s essential functionality. ASU 2009-13 modifies the requirements that must be met for the Company to recognize revenue from the sale of a delivered item that is part of a multiple-deliverable arrangement when other items have not yet been delivered. ASU 2009-13 establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable in a multiple-deliverable arrangement. The selling price must be based on vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), if available, or third-party evidence (TPE), if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Also, the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration has been eliminated. ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 were applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after adoption. There were no changes to the Company’s units of accounting within its multiple-deliverable arrangements, how the Company allocates arrangement consideration or in the pattern or timing of revenue recognition as a result of the adoption of these updates.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Revenue Recognition The Company’s revenue recognition policy is consistent with the requirements of FASB ASC 605, Revenue Recognition (ASC 605). In general, the Company records revenue when it is realized, or realizable and earned. The Company considers revenue to be realized, or realizable and earned, when the following revenue recognition requirements are met: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, which is a customer contract; the products or services have been approved by the customer via delivery or installation acceptance; the sales price is fixed or determinable within the contract; and collectability is probable. For product sales, the Company determines that the earnings process is complete when title, risk of loss and the right to use equipment has transferred to the customer. Within the North America business segment, this occurs upon customer acceptance. Where the Company is contractually responsible for installation, customer acceptance occurs upon completion of the installation of all items at a job site and the Company’s demonstration that the items are in operable condition. Where the Company is not contractually responsible for installation, revenue recognition of these items is upon shipment or delivery to a customer location depending on the terms in the contract. Within the international business segment, customer acceptance is upon the earlier of delivery or completion of the installation depending on the terms in the contract with the customer. The Company has the following revenue streams related to sales to its customers:

Financial Self-Service Product & Integrated Services Revenue Financial self-service products pertain to automated teller machines (ATMs). Included with the ATM is a software component and a non-software component that function together to deliver the ATM’s essential functionality. The Company also provides service contracts on ATMs. Service contracts typically cover a 12-month period and can begin at any given month after the warranty period expires. The service provided under warranty is limited as compared to those offered under service contracts. Further, warranty is not considered a separate deliverable of the sale. The Company’s warranty covers only replacement of defective parts inclusive of labor. Service contracts are tailored to meet the individual needs of each customer. Service contracts provide additional services beyond those covered under the warranty, and usually include preventative maintenance service, cleaning, supplies stocking and cash handling, all of which are not essential to the functionality of the equipment. Outsourced and managed services include remote monitoring, trouble-shooting for self-service customers, training, transaction processing, currency management, maintenance services and full support via person to person or online communication.

Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605, the application of which requires judgment including the determination of whether an arrangement includes multiple deliverables. For stand-alone sales of service contracts, revenue is recognized ratably over the life of the contract period. In contracts that involve multiple-deliverable arrangements, product maintenance services are typically accounted for under FASB ASC 605-20, Separately Priced Extended Warranty and Product Maintenance Contracts (ASC 605-20). Amounts deferred for undelivered items are determined based upon the selling price of the deliverables as prescribed in FASB ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Element Arrangements (ASC 605-25). The Company determines the selling price of deliverables within a multiple-deliverable arrangement based on VSOE (price when sold on stand-alone basis) or the estimated selling price where VSOE is not established for undelivered items. Total arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable’s selling price. There have been no material changes to these estimates for the periods presented and the Company believes that these estimates generally should not be subject to significant changes in the future. However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish the selling price could materially impact the amount of earned or deferred revenue.

Electronic Security Products & Integrated Services Revenue The Company provides global product sales, service, installation, project management and monitoring of original equipment manufacturer (OEM) electronic security products to financial, government, retail and commercial customers. These solutions provide the Company’s customers a single-source solution to their electronic security needs. Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605. Revenue on sales of the products described above is recognized upon shipment, installation or customer acceptance of the product as defined in the customer contract. In contracts that involve multiple deliverables, product maintenance services are typically accounted for under ASC 605-20. Amounts deferred for undelivered items are based upon the selling price of the deliverables as prescribed in ASC 605-25. The Company determines the selling price of deliverables within a multiple-deliverable arrangement based on the price charged when each deliverable is sold separately or estimated selling price. Total arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable’s selling price. There have been no material changes to these estimates for the periods presented and the Company believes that these estimates generally

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

should not be subject to significant changes in the future. However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish the selling price could materially impact the amount of earned or deferred revenue.

Physical Security & Facility Revenue The Company designs and manufactures several of its physical security and facility products. These consist of vaults, safe deposit boxes and safes, drive-up banking equipment and a host of other banking facilities products. Revenue on sales of the products described above is recognized when the revenue recognition requirements of ASC 605 have been met.

Election and Lottery Systems Revenue The Company offers election and lottery systems product solutions and support to the government in Brazil. Election systems revenue consists of election equipment, networking, tabulation and diagnostic software development, training, support and maintenance. Lottery systems revenue consists of lottery equipment. The election and lottery equipment components are included in product revenue. The software development, training, support and maintenance components are included in service revenue. The election and lottery systems contracts can contain multiple deliverables and custom terms and conditions. For contracts that do not contain multiple deliverables, revenue is recognized upon customer acceptance. In contracts that involve multiple deliverables, amounts deferred for undelivered items are based upon the selling price of the deliverables as prescribed in ASC 605-25. The Company determines the selling price of deliverables within a multiple-deliverable arrangement based on the estimated selling price. Total arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable’s selling price. There have been no material changes to these estimates for the periods presented and the Company believes that these estimates generally should not be subject to significant changes in the future. However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish the selling price could materially impact the amount of earned or deferred revenue.

Software Solutions & Service Revenue The Company offers software solutions consisting of multiple applications that process events and transactions (networking software) along with the related server. Sales of networking software represent software solutions to customers that allow them to network various different vendors’ ATMs onto one network and revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 985-605. Included within service revenue is revenue from software support agreements, which are typically 12 months in duration and pertain to networking software. For stand-alone sales of software support, revenue is recognized ratably over the life of the contract period. In contracts that involve multiple deliverables, amounts deferred for support are based upon VSOE of the value of the deliverables as prescribed in ASC 985-605, which requires judgment about whether the deliverables can be divided into more than one unit of accounting and whether the separate units of accounting have value to the customer on a stand-alone basis. There have been no material changes to these deliverables for the periods presented. However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish VSOE could affect the timing of revenue recognition.

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance

In May 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-19, Foreign Currency Issues: Multiple Foreign Currency Exchange Rates (ASU 2010-19). ASU 2010-19 is effective as of the announcement date of March 18, 2010. ASU 2010-19 provides the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) staff’s views on certain foreign currency issues related to investments in Venezuela. These issues relate to Venezuela’s highly inflationary status. The adoption of the provisions of ASU 2010-19 did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14, as noted above.

On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted FASB ASU 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (ASU 2010-06). ASU 2010-06 updates FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 requires additional disclosures about fair value measurements including transfers in and out of levels 1 and 2 and a higher level of disaggregation for the different types of financial instruments. On January 1, 2010, the Company early adopted ASU 2010-06 related to the reconciliation of level 3 fair value measurements, requiring information about purchases, sales, issuances and settlements to be presented separately. There was no material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements related to the adoption of this guidance.

On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted updated guidance included in FASB ASC 860-10, Transfers and Servicing — Overall. This guidance requires additional disclosures about the transfer and de-recognition of financial assets and eliminates the concept of qualifying special-purpose entities. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

On January 1, 2010, the Company adopted updated guidance included in FASB ASC 810, Consolidation (ASC 810), related to the consolidation of variable interest entities. This guidance requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. In addition, this updated guidance amends the quantitative approach for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. ASC 810 amends certain guidance for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity and adds additional reconsideration events for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entity. Further, this guidance requires enhanced disclosures that will provide users of financial statements with more transparent information about an enterprise’s involvement in a variable interest entity. The adoption of this guidance did not have an impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2: EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic and diluted earnings per share are calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 260, Earnings Per Share. Under this guidance, unvested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends are considered participating securities and the two-class method of computing earnings per share is required for all periods presented.

The Company’s participating securities include restricted stock units, deferred shares and shares that were vested, but deferred by the employee. The Company has calculated basic and diluted earnings per share under both the treasury stock method and the two-class method. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, there was no impact in the per share amounts calculated under the two methods, therefore the treasury stock method is disclosed below. The following data shows the amounts used in computing earnings per share under the treasury stock method and the effect on the weighted-average number of shares of dilutive potential common stock:


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Numerator:
Income used in basic and diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations, net of tax	$	44,062	$	24,486	$	99,370	$	65,203
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		2,043		(31,641)		390		(40,280)

Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	46,105	$	(7,155)	$	99,760	$	24,923


Denominator (in thousands):
Weighted-average number of common shares used in basic earnings per share		65,705		66,279		65,982		66,236
Effect of dilutive shares		716		672		587		574

Weighted-average number of shares used in diluted earnings per share		66,421		66,951		66,569		66,810


Basic earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations, net of tax	$	0.67	$	0.37	$	1.50	$	0.99
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		0.03		(0.48)		0.01		(0.61)

Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	0.70	$	(0.11)	$	1.51	$	0.38


Diluted earnings per share:
Income from continuing operations, net of tax	$	0.66	$	0.37	$	1.49	$	0.98
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		0.03		(0.48)		0.01		(0.61)

Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	0.69	$	(0.11)	$	1.50	$	0.37


Anti-dilutive shares (in thousands):
Anti-dilutive shares not used in calculating diluted weighted-average shares		2,160		2,146		2,047		2,372

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE 3: OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

The Company displays accumulated other comprehensive income separately from retained earnings and additional capital in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. Items recorded as other comprehensive income (loss) include adjustments made for foreign currency translation under FASB ASC 830, Foreign Currency Matters, pension adjustments, net of tax under FASB ASC 715, Compensation — Retirement Benefits, hedging activities under FASB ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging and unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities under FASB ASC 320, Investments.

The following table provides a reconciliation of total shareholders’ equity attributable to Diebold, Incorporated and the noncontrolling interests for the three months ended September 30, 2010:


			Total Diebold,
			Incorporated			Noncontrolling
	Total Equity		Shareholders’ Equity			Interests

Balance as of July 1, 2010	$	1,046,818	$	1,020,237	$	26,581
Net income		47,477		46,105		1,372

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency hedges and translation		57,964		57,591		373
Interest rate hedges		(227)		(227)		—
Pensions and other postretirement benefits		1,501		1,501		—
Unrealized loss, net on available-for-sale securities		(1,262)		(1,262)		—

Comprehensive income		105,453		103,708		1,745

Common shares		57		57		—
Additional capital		3,981		3,981		—
Treasury shares		(3,658)		(3,658)		—
Dividends declared		(17,913)		(17,913)		—
Distribution to noncontrolling interest holders		(1,217)		—		(1,217)

Balance as of September 30, 2010	$	1,133,521	$	1,106,412	$	27,109

The following table provides a reconciliation of total shareholders’ equity attributable to Diebold, Incorporated and the noncontrolling interests for the three months ended September 30, 2009:


			Total Diebold,
			Incorporated			Noncontrolling
	Total Equity		Shareholders’ Equity			Interests
Balance as of July 1, 2009	$	1,026,342	$	1,002,880	$	23,462
Net (loss) income		(6,404)		(7,155)		751

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency hedges and translation		47,784		48,988		(1,204)
Interest rate hedges		(427)		(427)		—
Pensions and other postretirement benefits		1,170		1,170		—

Comprehensive income (loss)		42,123		42,576		(453)

Common shares		65		65		—
Additional capital		3,889		3,889		—
Treasury shares		(41)		(41)		—
Dividends declared		(17,364)		(17,364)		—

Balance as of September 30, 2009	$	1,055,014	$	1,032,005	$	23,009

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following table provides a reconciliation of total shareholders’ equity attributable to Diebold, Incorporated and the noncontrolling interests for the nine months ended September 30, 2010:


				Total Diebold,
				Incorporated			Noncontrolling
	Total Equity			Shareholders’ Equity			Interests

Balance as of January 1, 2010	$	1,072,026		$	1,046,379		$	25,647
Net income		102,089			99,760			2,329

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Foreign currency hedges and translation		21,505			21,146			359
Interest rate hedges		(1,047	)		(1,047	)		-
Pensions and other postretirement benefits		4,199			4,199			-
Unrealized loss, net on available-for-sale securities		(607	)		(607	)		-

Comprehensive income		126,139			123,451			2,688

Common shares		268			268			-
Additional capital		15,089			15,089			-
Treasury shares		(24,786	)		(24,786	)		-
Dividends declared		(53,989	)		(53,989	)		-
Distribution to noncontrolling interest holders		(1,226	)		-			(1,226	)

Balance as of September 30, 2010	$	1,133,521		$	1,106,412		$	27,109

The following table provides a reconciliation of total shareholders’ equity attributable to Diebold, Incorporated and the noncontrolling interests for the nine months ended September 30, 2009:


				Total Diebold,
				Incorporated			Noncontrolling
	Total Equity			Shareholders’ Equity			Interests
Balance as of January 1, 2009	$	964,258		$	946,601		$	17,657
Net income		29,067			24,923			4,144

Other comprehensive income:
Foreign currency hedges and translation		101,386			99,639			1,747
Interest rate hedges		1,296			1,296			-
Pensions and other postretirement benefits		2,965			2,965			-

Comprehensive income		134,714			128,823			5,891

Common shares		337			337			-
Additional capital		10,200			10,200			-
Treasury shares		(1,879	)		(1,879	)		-
Dividends declared		(52,077	)		(52,077	)		-
Distribution to noncontrolling interest holders		(539	)		-			(539	)

Balance as of September 30, 2009	$	1,055,014		$	1,032,005		$	23,009

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE 4: SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company’s share-based compensation payments to employees are recognized in the statement of income based on their grant-date fair values during the period in which the employee is required to provide services in exchange for the award. Share-based compensation is recognized as a component of selling and administrative expense. Total share-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $3,155 and $9,520, respectively. Total share-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $2,841 and $8,898, respectively.

Options outstanding and exercisable as of September 30, 2010 under the Company’s 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan (as Amended and Restated as of April 13, 2009) and changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2010, were as follows:


					Weighted-
			Weighted-		Average
			Average		Remaining		Aggregate
	Number of		Exercise		Contractual		Intrinsic
	Shares		Price		Term		Value (1)
	(in thousands)		(per share)		(in years)
Outstanding at January 1, 2010		3,103	$	37.84
Expired or forfeited		(239)		41.91
Exercised		(67)		26.00
Granted		411		27.88

Outstanding at September 30, 2010		3,208	$	36.51		5	$	5,927


Options exercisable at September 30, 2010		2,207	$	40.25		4	$	1,851

(1)

The aggregate intrinsic value represents the total pre-tax intrinsic value (the difference between the closing price of the Company’s common shares on the last trading day of the third quarter of 2010 and the exercise price, multiplied by the number of “in-the-money” options) that would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options on September 30, 2010. The amount of aggregate intrinsic value will change based on the fair market value of the Company’s common shares.

Unvested performance shares are based on a maximum potential payout. Actual shares granted at the end of the performance period may be less than the maximum potential payout level depending on achievement of performance share objectives. The following tables summarize information on unvested restricted stock units (RSUs), performance shares and deferred shares for the nine months ended September 30, 2010:


	Number of		Weighted-Average
	Shares		Grant-Date Fair Value
	(in thousands)
RSUs:
Unvested at January 1, 2010		470	$	32.64
Forfeited		(33)		36.66
Vested		(88)		45.19
Granted		249		27.16

Unvested at September 30, 2010		598	$	29.04


Performance Shares:
Unvested at January 1, 2010		719	$	36.70
Forfeited		(162)		57.16
Vested		(52)		58.65
Granted		237		35.89

Unvested at September 30, 2010		742	$	31.15


Director Deferred Shares:
Oustanding at January 1, 2010		65	$	34.15
Granted		25		33.28

Outstanding at September 30, 2010		90	$	33.91

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE 5: INCOME TAXES

The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was 25.0 percent compared to 13.9 percent for the same period of 2009. The effective tax rate on continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was 27.4 percent compared to 23.2 percent for the same period of 2009. The 11.1 and 4.2 percentage point increase in the effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, was due to a higher percentage of income generated in regions with higher statutory tax rates, certain foreign income subject to tax in the United States. and tax benefits in 2009 related to the U.S. research and development credit and certain look-through rules that expired in 2010.

As previously noted, the tax rates for the three months and nine months ended September 30, 2009 included benefits related to the U.S. research and development credit and certain “look-through” rules related to foreign corporations, which expired on December 31, 2009. These benefits are not incorporated into the Company’s 2010 results as they have not been extended by the U.S. Congress.

Additionally, in March 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act as well as the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010 (the Acts) were signed into law. Beginning in 2013, the Acts eliminate the tax deduction of retiree prescription drug expenses that are reimbursed under Medicare Part D. The resulting deferred tax charge of $339 from enactment of the Acts was recognized in the results for the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

NOTE 6: INVESTMENTS

The Company’s investments, primarily in Brazil, consist of certificates of deposit and U.S. dollar indexed bond funds, which are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value based upon quoted market prices and net asset values, respectively. Unrealized gains and losses are recorded in other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses are recognized in investment income. Realized gains, net from the sale of securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were $33. Proceeds from the sale of available-for-sale securities were $35,624 during the nine months ended September 30, 2010.

The Company has deferred compensation plans that enable certain employees to defer receipt of a portion of their cash or share-based compensation and non-employee directors to defer receipt of director fees at the participants’ discretion. For deferred cash-based compensation, the Company established a rabbi trust which is recorded at fair value of the underlying securities within securities and other investments. The related deferred compensation liability is recorded at fair value within other long-term liabilities. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on marketable securities in the rabbi trust are recognized in investment income.

The Company’s investments, excluding cash surrender value of insurance contracts of $66,299 and $65,489 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, consist of the following:


			Unrealized
	Cost Basis		Loss			Fair Value
As of September 30, 2010
Short-term investments:
Certificates of deposit	$	183,561	$	-		$	183,561
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds		12,500		(607	)		11,893

	$	196,061	$	(607	)	$	195,454

Long-term investments:
Assets held in a rabbi trust	$	8,363	$	(421	)	$	7,942


As of December 31, 2009
Short-term investments:
Certificates of deposit	$	157,216	$	-		$	157,216
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds		20,226		-			20,226

	$	177,442	$	-		$	177,442

Long-term investments:
Assets held in a rabbi trust	$	9,400	$	(900	)	$	8,500

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE 7: INVENTORIES

Major classes of inventories are summarized as follows:


	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Finished goods	$	216,449	$	196,110
Service parts		168,094		168,281
Raw materials and work in process		100,286		83,852

Total inventories	$	484,829	$	448,243

NOTE 8: OTHER ASSETS

Included in other assets are net capitalized software development costs of $57,193 and $57,143 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. Amortization expense on capitalized software of $4,562 and $12,492 was included in product cost of sales for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively and $4,288 and $12,536 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. Other long-term assets also consist of patents, trademarks and other intangible assets. Where applicable, other assets are stated at cost and, if applicable, are amortized ratably over the relevant contract period or the estimated life of the assets. Fees to renew or extend the term of the Company’s intangible assets are expensed when incurred. Impairment of long-lived assets is recognized when events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the asset may not be recoverable. If the expected future undiscounted cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset group, an impairment loss may be recognized at that time to reduce the asset to its fair value in accordance with FASB ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment.

In the third quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $3,000 other-than-temporary impairment within Diebold North America (DNA) continuing operations related to a cost method investment. The Company determined this investment was fully impaired as of September 30, 2010 due to a decline in fair value.

In the second quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $4,096 intangible asset impairment within DNA continuing operations related to the 2004 acquisition of TFE Technology Holdings, a maintenance provider of network and hardware service solutions to federal and state government agencies and commercial firms. The impairment was a result of negative cash flows which were projected to persist related to this business due to non-renewal of certain contracts. Based on an analysis of the discounted and undiscounted future cash flows related to this business, the Company determined these customer contract intangible assets were fully impaired as of June 30, 2010.

Investment in Affiliate Investment in the Company’s non-consolidated affiliate is accounted for under the equity method and consists of a 50 percent ownership in Shanghai Diebold King Safe Company, Ltd. The balance of this investment as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was $11,242 and $11,308, respectively, and fluctuated based on equity earnings and dividends. Equity earnings from the non-consolidated affiliate are included in miscellaneous, net in the condensed consolidated statements of income and were $680 and $2,106 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, respectively, and $447 and $1,720 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, respectively. The non-consolidated affiliate declared dividends of $2,172 for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

NOTE 9: DEBT

Outstanding debt balances were as follows:


	September 30, 2010		December 31, 2009
Notes payable - current:
Uncommitted lines of credit	$	611	$	16,915


Long-term debt:
Credit facility	$	293,050	$	240,000
Senior notes		300,000		300,000
Industrial development revenue bonds		11,900		11,900
Other		2,831		1,108

	$	607,781	$	553,008

As of September 30, 2010, the Company had various international short-term uncommitted lines of credit with borrowing limits of $67,973. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding borrowings on these lines of credit as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was 14.00 and 9.15 percent, respectively. Short-term uncommitted lines mature in less than one year. The amount available under the short-term uncommitted lines at September 30, 2010 was $67,362.

In October 2009, the Company entered into a three-year credit facility. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had borrowing limits under this facility totaling $502,240 ($400,000 and €75,000, translated). Under the terms of the credit facility agreement, the Company has the ability, subject to various approvals, to increase the borrowing limits by $200,000 and €37,500, respectively. Up to $30,000 and €15,000 of the revolving credit facility is available under a swing line subfacility. The weighted-average interest rate on outstanding credit facility borrowings as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was 2.72 and 2.63 percent, respectively, which is variable based on the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR). The amount available under the credit facility as of September 30, 2010 was $209,190.

In March 2006, the Company issued senior notes in an aggregate principal amount of $300,000 with a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.50 percent. The maturity dates of the senior notes are staggered, with $75,000, $175,000 and $50,000 becoming due in 2013, 2016 and 2018, respectively. Additionally, the Company entered into a derivative transaction to hedge interest rate risk on $200,000 of the senior notes, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.

In 1997, industrial development revenue bonds were issued on behalf of the Company. The proceeds from the bond issuances were used to construct new manufacturing facilities in the United States. The Company guaranteed the payments of principal and interest on the bonds by obtaining letters of credit. The bonds were issued with a 20-year original term and are scheduled to mature in 2017. Each industrial development revenue bond carries a variable interest rate, which is reset weekly by the remarketing agents. The weighted-average interest rate on the bonds was 0.57 and 0.80 percent as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

The Company’s financing agreements contain various restrictive financial covenants, including net debt to capitalization and net interest coverage ratios. As of September 30, 2010, the Company was in compliance with the financial covenants in its debt agreements.

NOTE 10: BENEFIT PLANS

The Company has pension plans covering certain U.S. employees. Plans that cover certain salaried employees provide pension benefits based on the employee’s compensation during the ten years before retirement. The Company’s funding policy for salaried plans is to contribute annually based on actuarial projections and applicable regulations. Plans covering certain hourly employees and union members generally provide benefits of stated amounts for each year of service. The Company’s funding policy for hourly plans is to make at least the minimum annual contributions required by applicable regulations. Employees of the Company’s operations in countries outside of the United States participate to varying degrees in local pension plans, which in the aggregate are not significant.

In addition to providing pension benefits, the Company provides healthcare and life insurance benefits (referred to as other benefits) for certain retired employees. Eligible employees may be entitled to these benefits based upon years of service with the Company, age at retirement and collective bargaining agreements. Currently, the Company has made no commitments to increase these benefits for

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

existing retirees or for employees who may become eligible for these benefits in the future. There are no plan assets and the Company funds the benefits as the claims are paid.

The following table sets forth the net periodic benefit cost for the Company’s defined benefit pension plans and other benefits:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009		2010			2009
	Pension Benefits				Other Benefits
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	2,500	$	2,726	$	-		$	-
Interest cost		7,680		7,236		249			282
Expected return on plan assets		(9,604)		(9,244)		-			-
Amortization of prior service cost		48		68		(130	)		(130	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		1,512		1,122		71			110

Net periodic pension benefit cost	$	2,136	$	1,908	$	190		$	262


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009		2010			2009
	Pension Benefits				Other Benefits
Components of net periodic benefit cost
Service cost	$	7,498	$	8,177	$	-		$	-
Interest cost		23,042		21,710		745			845
Expected return on plan assets		(28,810)		(27,730)		-			-
Amortization of prior service cost		145		203		(388	)		(388	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		4,229		2,819		213			331

Net periodic pension benefit cost	$	6,104	$	5,179	$	570		$	788

Cash Flows

There have been no significant changes to the 2010 plan year contribution amounts previously disclosed. For the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, contributions of $14,673 and $16,978, respectively, were made to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans.

In addition to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans, union employees in one of the Company’s U.S. manufacturing facilities participated in the International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, Machine and Furniture Workers-Communications Workers of America (IUE-CWA) multi-employer pension fund. This facility was closed in 2008 which triggered a withdrawal liability from the pension fund. The withdrawal liability was settled for $5,632 and was paid in the second quarter of 2010.

NOTE 11: GUARANTEES AND PRODUCT WARRANTIES

In September 2009, the Company sold its U.S. election systems business. The related sale agreement contained shared liability clauses pursuant to which the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser for 70 percent of any adverse consequences to the purchaser arising out of certain defined potential litigation or obligations. As of September 30, 2010, there were no material adverse consequences related to these shared liability indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under the shared liability indemnifications is $8,000.

In 1997, industrial development revenue bonds were issued on behalf of the Company. The Company guaranteed the payments of principal and interest on the bonds (refer to note 9) by obtaining letters of credit. The carrying value of the bonds was $11,900 as of September 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009.

The Company provides its global operations guarantees and standby letters of credit through various financial institutions to suppliers, customers, regulatory agencies and insurance providers. If the Company is not able to make payment or fulfill contractual obligations, the suppliers, customers, regulatory agencies and insurance providers may draw on the pertinent bank. At September 30, 2010, the maximum future payment obligations related to these various guarantees totaled $70,036, of which $23,202 represented standby

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

letters of credit to insurance providers, and no associated liability was recorded. At December 31, 2009, the maximum future payment obligations relative to these various guarantees totaled $53,419, of which $22,628 represented standby letters of credit to insurance providers, and no associated liability was recorded.

The Company provides its customers a manufacturer’s warranty and records, at the time of the sale, a corresponding estimated liability for potential warranty costs. Estimated future obligations due to warranty claims are based upon historical factors such as labor rates, average repair time, travel time, number of service calls per machine and cost of replacement parts. Changes in the Company’s warranty liability balance are illustrated in the following table:


	2010		2009
Balance at January 1	$	62,673	$	43,009
Current period accruals (a)		50,409		50,186
Current period settlements		(41,343)		(34,941)

Balance at September 30	$	71,739	$	58,254

(a) includes the impact of foreign exchange rate fluctuations

NOTE 12: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES

The Company uses derivatives to mitigate the economic consequences associated with the fluctuations in currencies and interest rates. The Company records all derivative instruments on the balance sheet at fair value and the changes in the fair value are recognized in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. Special accounting for qualifying hedges allows derivative gains and losses to be reflected in the statement of income or other comprehensive income together with the hedged exposure, and requires that the Company formally document, designate and assess the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting treatment. Gains or losses associated with ineffectiveness must be reported currently in earnings. The Company does not enter into any speculative positions with regard to derivative instruments.

The Company periodically evaluates its monetary asset and liability positions denominated in foreign currencies. The impact of the Company and the counterparties’ credit risk on the fair value of the contracts is considered as well as the ability of each party to execute its obligations under the contract. The Company uses investment grade financial counterparties in these transactions and believes that the resulting credit risk under these hedging strategies is not significant.

FOREIGN EXCHANGE

Non-Designated Hedges A substantial portion of the Company’s operations and revenues are international. As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates can create substantial foreign exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of non-functional currency monetary assets and liabilities. The Company’s policy allows the use of foreign exchange forward contracts with maturities of up to 24 months to mitigate the impact of currency fluctuations on those foreign currency asset and liability balances. The Company elected not to apply hedge accounting to its foreign exchange forward contracts. Thus, spot-based gains/losses offset revaluation gains/losses within foreign exchange loss, net and forward-based gains/losses represent interest expense. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, there were 229 and 636 non-designated foreign exchange contracts that settled, respectively. As of September 30, 2010, there were 54 non-designated foreign exchange contracts outstanding, primarily euro, British pound and Swiss franc, totaling $507,731, which represents the absolute value of notional amounts.

Net Investment Hedges The Company has international subsidiaries with assets in excess of liabilities that generate cumulative translation adjustments within other comprehensive income. During 2009, the Company used derivatives to manage potential adverse changes in value of its net investments in Brazil. The Company used the forward to forward method for its quarterly retrospective and prospective assessments of hedge effectiveness. No ineffectiveness results if the notional amount of the derivative matches the portion of the net investment designated as being hedged because the Company uses derivative instruments with underlying exchange rates consistent with its functional currency and the functional currency of the hedged net investment. Changes in value that are deemed effective are accumulated in other comprehensive income where they will remain until they are reclassified to income together with the gain or loss on the entire investment upon substantial liquidation of the subsidiary.

INTEREST RATE

Cash Flow Hedges The Company has variable rate debt and is subject to fluctuations in interest related cash flows due to changes in market interest rates. The Company’s policy allows derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges which fix a portion of

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

future variable-rate interest expense. The Company has executed two pay-fixed receive-variable interest rate swaps, with a total notional amount of $50,000, to hedge against changes in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate on a portion of the Company’s LIBOR-based borrowings. In October 2009, the Company used borrowings of approximately $205,000 and €50,300 under its new credit facility to repay all amounts outstanding under (and terminated) the prior credit facility. While the LIBOR-based cash flows designated in the original hedge relationships remain probable of occurring, the Company elected to de-designate the original cash flow hedging relationships and designated new hedging relationships in conjunction with entering into its new credit facility.

The Company’s monthly retrospective assessment of hedge effectiveness to determine whether the hedging relationship continues to qualify for hedge accounting is performed using regression analysis. The Company’s monthly prospective assessment of hedge effectiveness to measure the extent to which exact offset is not achieved is performed by comparing the cumulative change in the fair value of the interest rate swaps to the cumulative change in the fair value of the hypothetical interest rate swaps with critical terms that match the LIBOR-based borrowings. When computing cumulative changes in fair values, the Company computes the difference between the current fair value and the sum of all future discounted cash flows projected at designation that are not yet paid or accrued as of the current valuation date in order to isolate changes in fair value primarily attributable to changes in interest rates. Changes in value that are deemed effective are accumulated in other comprehensive income and reclassified to interest expense when the hedged interest is accrued. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company recognized net losses of $228 and $307 representing the change in fair value of the interest rate swap that was deemed ineffective. To the extent that it becomes probable that the Company’s variable rate borrowings will not occur, the gains or losses on the related cash flow hedges will be reclassified from other comprehensive income to interest expense.

In December 2005 and January 2006, the Company executed cash flow hedges by entering into receive-variable and pay-fixed interest rate swaps, with a total notional amount of $200,000, related to the senior notes issuance in March 2006. Amounts previously recorded in other comprehensive income related to the pre-issuance cash flow hedges will continue to be reclassified to income on a straight-line basis through February 2016.

The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments designated and not designated as hedging instruments and their respective balance sheet location:


	September 30, 2010			December 31, 2009			Balance Sheet Location (1)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments
Liability derivatives:
Interest rate contracts	$	(1,348	)	$	(2,122	)	Other current liabilities
Interest rate contracts		(3,137	)		(1,277	)	Other long-term liabilities

Total liability derivatives		(4,485	)		(3,399	)

Total derivatives designated	$	(4,485	)	$	(3,399	)


Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Asset derivatives:
Foreign exchange contracts	$	2,537		$	1,047		Other current assets
Foreign exchange contracts		1,100			399		Other current liabilities

Total asset derivatives		3,637			1,446

Liability derivatives:
Foreign exchange contracts		(999	)		(560	)	Other current assets
Foreign exchange contracts		(3,858	)		(2,171	)	Other current liabilities

Total liability derivatives		(4,857	)		(2,731	)

Total derivatives not designated	$	(1,220	)	$	(1,285	)


Total derivatives	$	(5,705	)	$	(4,684	)


(1)	The balance sheet location noted above represents the balance sheet line item where the respective contract types are reported using a net basis due to master netting agreements with counterparties. However, the asset derivative and liability derivative categories noted above represent the Company’s derivative positions on a gross contract by contract basis.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following tables summarize the gain (loss) recognized on designated derivative instruments:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Interest rate contracts
(Loss) gain recognized in OCI (effective portion)	$	(127	)	$	(419	)	$	(778	)	$	1,090
Gain (loss) reclassified from accumulated OCI (effective portion)		100			8			269			(206	)
Loss recognized in income (ineffective portion)		(228	)		-			(307	)		-

Foreign exchange contracts
Loss recognized in OCI (effective portion)		-			(2,051	)		-			(4,533	)

Gains and losses related to interest rate contracts that are reclassified from accumulated OCI are recorded in interest expense on the statement of income. The Company anticipates reclassifying $1,019 from other comprehensive income to interest expense within the next 12 months.

The following table summarizes the gain (loss) recognized on non-designated derivative instruments:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009			Income Statement Location
Foreign exchange contracts	$	(1,805	)	$	(2,250	)	$	(4,864	)	$	(7,445	)	Interest expense
Foreign exchange contracts		(12,285	)		366			9,870			(17,622	)	Foreign exchange gain (loss), net

Total	$	(14,090	)	$	(1,884	)	$	5,006		$	(25,067	)

NOTE 13: RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER CHARGES

Restructuring Charges

The following table summarizes the impact of the Company’s restructuring charges (benefits) on the condensed consolidated statements of income:


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010			2009
Cost of sales - products	$	305	$	700	$	787		$	3,104
Cost of sales - services		35		536		(175	)		3,936
Selling and administrative expense		100		411		2,336			3,086
Research, development and engineering expense		43		125		(155	)		102

Total	$	483	$	1,772	$	2,793		$	10,228

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following table summarizes the Company’s restructuring charges (benefits) within continuing operations for its DNA and DI reporting segments:


	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,
	2010			2009		2010			2009
DNA
Severance	$	352		$	583	$	2,235		$	2,777
Other (1)		(98	)		774		(215	)		2,908
DI
Severance		178			187		556			3,900
Other (2)		51			228		217			643

Total	$	483		$	1,772	$	2,793		$	10,228


(1)		Net other restructuring charges (benefits) included in the DNA segment include pension obligation, gain on sale of assets and costs to move products.

(2)		Net other restructuring charges included in the DI segment include legal and professional fees.

Net restructuring charges of $2,354 and $4,098 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to reductions in the Company’s global workforce, including realignment of the organization and resources to better support opportunities in emerging growth markets and consolidation of certain international facilities in efforts to optimize overall operational performance. In December 2009, the Company began to implement a workforce reduction of 350 employees, which primarily affects its Canton, Ohio area facilities. The Company expects to complete this workforce reduction no later than the end of 2010.

Net restructuring charges of $408 and $2,859 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, related to the Company’s strategic global manufacturing realignment plans. The Company’s global manufacturing realignment plans include the closure of its manufacturing facilities in Newark, Ohio and Cassis, France in 2008 and 2006, respectively as well as the movement of Opteva product manufacturing out of Lexington, North Carolina in 2009. The Company believes these plans are substantially complete. Security manufacturing operations continue in the Lexington facility. Restructuring charges in 2010 were primarily the result of legal and professional fees related to these plans. These charges were partially offset by benefits related to a pension obligation which was settled in the first quarter of 2010 (refer to note 10) and a gain on the sale of assets.

Other restructuring charges were $31 and $3,271 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The 2009 costs were primarily related to employee severance costs in connection with the Company’s sale of a manufacturing facility in Argentina.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following table summarizes the Company’s cumulative total restructuring costs for the significant plans:


			Global
	Workforce		Manufacturing
	Reductions		Realignment
Costs incurred to date:
DNA	$	20,441	$	12,430
DI		19,743		24,767

Total costs incurred to date	$	40,184	$	37,197


Remaining costs:
DNA	$	250	$	62
DI		250		410

Remaining costs as of September 30, 2010	$	500	$	472

The following table summarizes the Company’s restructuring accrual balances and related activity for the nine months ended September 30, 2010:


	Severance			Other			Total
Balance as of January 1, 2010	$	15,195		$	6,722		$	21,917
Liabilities incurred/changes in estimates		2,791			2			2,793
Liabilities paid		(14,642	)		(6,724	)		(21,366	)

Balance as of September 30, 2010	$	3,344		$	-		$	3,344

Other Charges and Expense Reimbursements

Other charges and expense reimbursements consist of items that the Company determines are non-routine in nature and are not expected to recur in future operations. Net non-routine income of $4,130 impacted the nine months ended September 30, 2010 compared to net non-routine expenses of $15,005 in the same period of 2009. Net non-routine income for 2010 consisted primarily of reimbursements from the Company’s director and officer (D&O) insurance carriers related to legal and other expenses incurred as part of the SEC and Department of Justice (DOJ) investigations (government investigations) and was recorded in selling and administrative expense. The Company continues to pursue reimbursement with its D&O insurance carriers of approximately $6,900 of previously incurred legal and other expenditures related to the government investigations. In June 2010, the SEC finalized the settlement of civil charges stemming from the government investigations. The Company had previously reached an agreement in principle in 2009 with the staff of the SEC and the Company accrued a $25,000 penalty in the first quarter of 2009, which was paid in June 2010. Net non-routine expenses in 2009 consisted of $1,328 in legal and other consultation fees recorded in selling and administrative expense related to the government investigations and a $25,000 charge, recorded in miscellaneous, net, related to the 2009 agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC to settle civil charges. In addition, in 2009 selling and administrative expense was offset by $11,323 of non-routine income, primarily related to reimbursements from the Company’s D&O insurance carriers related to legal and other expenses incurred as part of the government investigations.

NOTE 14: FAIR VALUE OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

The Company measures its financial assets and liabilities using one or more of the following three valuation techniques:

	•		Market approach — Prices and other relevant information generated by market transactions involving identical or comparable assets or liabilities.

	•		Cost approach — Amount that would be required to replace the service capacity of an asset (replacement cost).

	•		Income approach — Techniques to convert future amounts to a single present amount based upon market expectations.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value is divided into three levels:

	•		Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

	•		Level 2 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities, unadjusted quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active or inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly.

	•		Level 3 — Unobservable inputs for which there is little or no market data.

Summary of Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Market Value

Assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurement are as follows:


	September 30, 2010								December 31, 2009
			Fair Value Measurements Using								Fair Value Measurements Using
	Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
Assets
Short-term investments
Certificates of deposit	$	183,561	$	183,561	$	-	$	-	$	157,216	$	157,216	$	-	$	-
U.S. dollar indexed bond funds		11,893		-		11,893		-		20,226		-		20,226		-
Assets held in a rabbi trust		7,942		7,942		-		-		8,500		8,500		-		-
Foreign exchange forward contracts		1,538		-		1,538		-		487		-		487		-
Contingent consideration on sale of business		1,652		-		-		1,652		2,386		-		-		2,386

Total	$	206,586	$	191,503	$	13,431	$	1,652	$	188,815	$	165,716	$	20,713	$	2,386


Liabilities
Deferred compensation	$	7,942	$	7,942	$	-	$	-	$	8,500	$	8,500	$	-	$	-
Foreign exchange forward contracts		2,758		-		2,758		-		1,772		-		1,772		-
Interest rate swaps		4,485		-		4,485		-		3,399		-		3,399		-

Total	$	15,185	$	7,942	$	7,243	$	-	$	13,671	$	8,500	$	5,171	$	-

Short-Term Investments The Company has investments in certificates of deposit that are recorded at cost, which approximates fair value. Additionally, the Company has investments in U.S. dollar indexed bond funds that are classified as available-for-sale and stated at fair value. U.S. dollar indexed bond funds are reported at net asset value, which is the practical expedient for fair value as determined by banks where funds are held.

Assets Held in a Rabbi Trust / Deferred Compensation The fair value of the assets held in a rabbi trust (refer to note 6) is derived from investments in a mix of money market, fixed income and equity funds managed by Vanguard. The related deferred compensation liability is recorded at fair value.

Foreign Exchange Forward Contracts A substantial portion of the Company’s operations and revenues are international. As a result, changes in foreign exchange rates can create substantial foreign exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of non-functional currency monetary assets and liabilities. The foreign exchange contracts are valued using the market approach based on observable market transactions of forward rates.

Interest Rate Swaps The Company has variable rate debt and is subject to fluctuations in interest related cash flows due to changes in market interest rates. The Company’s policy allows it to periodically enter into derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges to fix some portion of future variable rate based interest expense. The Company has executed two pay-fixed receive-variable interest rate swaps to hedge against changes in the LIBOR benchmark interest rate on a portion of the Company’s LIBOR- based borrowings. The fair value of the swap is determined using the income approach and is calculated based on LIBOR rates at the reporting date.

Contingent Consideration on Sale of Business The Company’s September 2009 sale of its U.S. elections systems business included contingent consideration related to 70 percent of any cash collected over a five-year period on the accounts receivable balance of the sold business as of August 31, 2009. The fair value of the contingent consideration was determined based on recent collections on the accounts receivable as well as the probability of future anticipated collections (level 3 inputs) and was recorded at the net present value of the future anticipated cash flows.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following table summarizes the changes in fair value of the Company’s level 3 assets:


Balance as of January 1, 2010	$	2,386
Cash collections		(1,815	)
Fair value adjustments		1,081

Balance as of September 30, 2010	$	1,652

Summary of Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Carrying Value

The fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and accounts payable, approximates the carrying value due to the relative short maturity of these instruments. The fair value and carrying value of the Company’s debt instruments are summarized as follows:


	September 30, 2010				December 31, 2009
			Carrying				Carrying
	Fair Value		Value		Fair Value		Value
Current notes payable	$	611	$	611	$	16,915	$	16,915
Long-term debt		614,656		607,781		550,254		553,008

Total debt instruments	$	615,267	$	608,392	$	567,169	$	569,923

The fair value of the Company’s industrial development revenue bonds are measured using unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets categorized as level 1 inputs. The fair value of the Company’s current and long-term credit facility debt instruments approximates the carrying value due to the relative short maturity of the revolving borrowings under these instruments. The fair values of the Company’s long-term senior notes was estimated using market observable inputs for the Company’s comparable peers with public debt, including quoted prices in active markets, market indices and interest rate measurements, considered level 2 inputs.

NOTE 15: SEGMENT INFORMATION

The DNA segment sells and services financial and retail systems in the United States and Canada. The DI segment sells and services financial and retail systems over the remainder of the globe as well as voting and lottery solutions in Brazil. Each segment buys the goods it sells from the Company’s manufacturing plants or through external suppliers. Intercompany sales between legal entities are eliminated in consolidation and intersegment revenue is not significant. Each year, intercompany pricing is agreed upon which drives operating profit contribution.

The reconciliation between segment information and the condensed consolidated financial statements is disclosed. Revenue summaries by geographic area and product and service solutions are also disclosed. Certain information not routinely used in the management of the DNA and DI segments, information not allocated back to the segments or information that is impractical to report is not shown. Items not allocated are as follows: investment income; interest expense; equity in the net income of investees accounted for by the equity method; income tax expense or benefit; and discontinued operations.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s segment information:


	DNA		DI		Total
For the three months ended September 30, 2010
Customer revenue	$	349,673	$	398,947	$	748,620
Operating profit		34,270		18,109		52,379
Capital expenditures		6,872		4,203		11,075
Depreciation		8,624		7,437		16,061

For the three months ended September 30, 2009
Customer revenue	$	325,363	$	319,859	$	645,222
Operating profit		19,544		11,626		31,170
Capital expenditures		3,480		2,797		6,277
Depreciation		6,383		4,605		10,988

As of and for the nine months September 30, 2010
Customer revenue	$	968,508	$	1,064,291	$	2,032,799
Operating profit		67,096		72,723		139,819
Capital expenditures		24,373		13,618		37,991
Depreciation		19,877		18,991		38,868
Property, plant and equipment, at cost		456,974		176,533		633,507
Total assets		1,046,254		1,544,088		2,590,342

As of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
Customer revenue	$	1,043,500	$	949,869	$	1,993,369
Operating profit		68,353		53,901		122,254
Capital expenditures		18,746		9,668		28,414
Depreciation		19,309		15,425		34,734
Property, plant and equipment, at cost		439,004		166,232		605,236
Total assets		1,139,171		1,384,890		2,524,061

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s revenue by geographic region:


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Revenue summary by geography
Diebold North America	$	349,673	$	325,363	$	968,508	$	1,043,500
Diebold International:
Latin America including Brazil		248,649		150,154		573,976		437,757
Asia Pacific		68,391		98,142		257,249		280,762
Europe, Middle East and Africa		81,907		71,563		233,066		231,350

Total Diebold International		398,947		319,859		1,064,291		949,869

Total revenue	$	748,620	$	645,222	$	2,032,799	$	1,993,369

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

The following table presents information regarding the Company’s revenue by product and service solution:


	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				September 30,
Revenue summary by product and service solution	2010		2009		2010		2009
Financial self-service:
Products	$	237,686	$	216,520	$	645,127	$	722,020
Services		273,049		268,816		806,306		798,275

Total financial self-service		510,735		485,336		1,451,433		1,520,295
Security:
Products		49,150		61,173		149,545		177,002
Services		103,970		97,201		298,243		292,081

Total security		153,120		158,374		447,788		469,083

Total financial self-service & security		663,855		643,710		1,899,221		1,989,378
Election and lottery systems:
Products		84,760		1,512		133,553		3,991
Services		5		—		25		—

Total election and lottery systems		84,765		1,512		133,578		3,991

Total revenue	$	748,620	$	645,222	$	2,032,799	$	1,993,369

NOTE 16: DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

During the third quarter of 2009, the Company sold its U.S. election systems business, primarily consisting of its subsidiary Premier Election Solutions, Inc. (PESI), for $12,147, including $5,000 of cash and contingent consideration with a fair value of $7,147, which represents 70 percent of any cash collected over a five-year period on the accounts receivable balance of the sold business as of August 31, 2009. The sale agreement contained indemnification clauses pursuant to which the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser for any and all adverse consequences relating to certain existing liabilities. In addition, the sale agreement contained shared liability clauses pursuant to which the Company agreed to indemnify the purchaser for 70 percent of any adverse consequences to the purchaser arising out of certain defined potential litigation or obligations. As of September 30, 2010, there were no material adverse consequences related to these shared liability indemnifications. The Company’s maximum exposure under the shared liability indemnifications is $8,000. The carrying value of the indemnified and shared liabilities related to the PESI sale was $1,531 as of September 30, 2010.

During the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company decided to discontinue its enterprise security operations in the Europe, Middle East and Africa region.

Summarized financial information for discontinued operations is as follows:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Total revenue	$	199		$	5,194		$	510		$	23,018


Loss from discontinued operations	$	(167	)	$	(2,633	)	$	(2,634	)	$	(14,781	)
Loss on sale of discontinued operations		-			(50,750	)		-			(50,750	)
Income tax benefit		2,210			21,742			3,024			25,251

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	2,043		$	(31,641	)	$	390		$	(40,280	)

During the third quarter of 2010, the Company finalized and filed its consolidated U.S. federal tax return and recorded an additional tax benefit of $2,147 included within income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS as of September 30, 2010
DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

OVERVIEW

Management’s discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.

Introduction

Diebold, Incorporated is a global leader in providing integrated self-service delivery and security systems and services primarily to the financial, enterprise, government, and retail markets. Founded in 1859, the Company today has more than 16,000 employees with representation in nearly 90 countries worldwide.

During the past four years, the Company’s management continued to execute against its strategic roadmap developed in 2006 to strengthen operations and build a strong foundation for future success in its two core lines of business: financial self-service and security solutions. This roadmap was built around five key priorities: increase customer loyalty; improve quality; strengthen the supply chain; enhance communications and teamwork; and rebuild profitability. In 2010, there have been encouraging signs of stabilization and growth in many of the Company’s major geographic areas. The Company’s focus is on capturing this demand and on converting these opportunities into longer-term, services-driven relationships whenever possible. Also, the Company will continue to focus on remediation of its material weaknesses related to internal control over financial reporting.

During the third quarter of 2010, the Company delivered solid results with the Brazil elections systems business having a large positive impact. In addition, the Company’s core business in Brazil, as well as other key geographies performed extremely well during the third quarter of 2010, delivering meaningful top-line growth and significant improvement in earnings. Also encouraging was the double-digit increase in global orders. Each geographic region delivered order growth during the period, which affirms the Company’s assessment that its industry is beginning to recover. Income from continuing operations attributable to Diebold, Incorporated, net of tax, for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $44,062 or $0.66 per share, an increase of $19,576 or $0.29 per share, respectively, from the same period of 2009. Revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2010 was $748,620, an increase of 16.0 percent from same period of 2009. Income from continuing operations attributable to Diebold, Incorporated, net of tax, for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $99,370 or $1.49 per share, an increase of $34,167 or $0.51 per share, respectively, from the same period of 2009. Revenue for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 was $2,032,799, an increase of 2.0 percent from same period of 2009.

Vision and strategy

The Company’s vision is to be recognized as the essential partner in creating and implementing ideas that optimize convenience, efficiency and security. This vision is the guiding principle behind the Company’s transformation to becoming a more services-oriented company. Today, service comprises more than 50 percent of the Company’s revenue. The Company expects that this percentage will continue to grow over time as the Company continues to build on its strong base of maintenance and advanced services to deliver world-class integrated services. For example, in the second quarter of 2010, the Company announced that Bellco Credit Union, among the 50 largest credit unions in the United States, chose Diebold Integrated Services^® to enhance the efficiency of its operations and provide the latest financial innovations to its members. As part of the agreement, the Company upgraded 65 ATMs for Bellco. Fifty Diebold Opteva^{^®}terminals now include advanced deposit automation technology, enhancing the self-service transaction experience for Bellco members. While this example represents a relatively small base, management is encouraged by the rate at which the Diebold Integrated Services business is growing. In recognition of the Company’s efforts, it was ranked 15^th on the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals’^® 2010 Global Outsourcing 100 list.

Another area of focus within the financial self-service business is broadening the Company’s deposit automation solutions set, including check imaging, envelope-free currency acceptance, teller automation, and payment and document imaging solutions. The Company’s ImageWay^® check-imaging solution fulfills an industry-wide demand for cutting-edge technologies that enhance efficiencies. To date, the Company has shipped more than 50,000 deposit automation modules. During the third quarter of 2010, the Company announced that Vakifbank, the fifth largest bank in Turkey, had signed a deal with the Company to provide 575 image-enabled Opteva^® ATMs equipped with coin dispensers and the enhanced note acceptor (ENA), enabling cash deposit and bill pay functionality, along with customized Agilissoftware that will operate the bank’s terminals.

Financial institutions are eager to reduce costs and optimize management and productivity of their ATM channels — and they are increasingly exploring new solutions. The Company remains uniquely positioned to provide the infrastructure necessary to manage all aspects of an ATM network. For example, U.S. Bank is partnering with the Company to provide a multi-vendor software application

to run on the U.S. Bank’s Prodigy ATM terminals across its expanding retail franchise. The Company developed a custom software solution for the bank, built on the Company’s cross-vendor Agilis EmPower^® application. The Company will achieve a milestone as it delivers this solution to U.S. Bank ATMs — more than 500,000 terminals around the world are running Agilis software and cross-vendor framework components. The Company’s software solution offers advantages to U.S. Bank, including operational efficiency and brand differentiation. The application provides a platform for enhanced ATM services to U.S. Bank’s customers into the future, such as deposit automation. In addition, the Company has introduced a comprehensive portfolio of skimming-protection solutions that help financial institutions mitigate card skimming, one of the largest threats against the ATM channel worldwide. Designed to provide effective countermeasures against known skimming attack vectors, the Company’s ATM Security Protection Suite consists of anti-skimming packages and an industry-leading outsourced monitoring service. The suite offers five levels of protection to proactively guard against increasingly sophisticated card-skimming attacks. In addition, during the third quarter the Company announced it earned compliance with two important third-party audits that verify its continuous compliance with industry standards for ATM security. The Company achieved full compliance with ANSI/X9 TR-39-2009 (TR-39) and PCI PIN Review audits for encrypted personal identification number (PIN) pad and remote key loading technologies employed in the Company’s Opteva^® ATMs. The TR-39 and PCI PIN Review audits confirm that the Company is following ATM security best practices related to the management, PINs and data.

Within the security business, the Company is diversifying by expanding and enhancing offerings in its financial, government, enterprise and retail markets. Looking ahead, management believes enterprise security and other growth initiatives outside of the financial space — particularly in the security monitoring, retail and enterprise markets — will help build growth. Additional growth strategies include broadening the Company’s solutions portfolio in fire, energy management, remote video surveillance, logical security and integrated enterprise systems as well as expanding the distribution model. During the third quarter of 2010, the Company announced it lent its security expertise as a consultant and integrator for a security infrastructure upgrade at the North American headquarters of world-renowned Christie’s Auction House. The Company designed a new command and control center for Christie’s Rockefeller Center headquarters in New York City. In addition, the Company currently teamed with McKenney’s, Inc. (McKenney’s), a major design build mechanical contracting and systems integration firm, to provide advanced monitoring services to McKenney’s customer base across the southeastern United States. As a new member of the Diebold Advanced Dealer Program, McKenney’s will leverage the Company’s full line of award-winning advanced monitoring solutions to help its customers reduce costs, enhance security and increase operational efficiencies.

The focus for 2010 is to continue striking an appropriate balance between reducing costs and investing in future growth. The Company will continue to differentiate itself using its total value proposition, particularly as it relates to growth in emerging markets, deposit automation, services and security.

Cost savings initiatives, restructuring and other charges

In 2006, the Company launched the SmartBusiness (SB) 100 initiative to deliver $100,000 in cost savings by the end of 2008. In September 2008, the Company announced a new goal to achieve an additional $100,000 in cost savings called SB 200 by the end of 2011. The Company is currently on track to meet its 2010 savings target. The SB 200 initiative has led to rationalization of product development, streamlining procurement, realigning the Company’s manufacturing footprint and improving logistics.

The Company is committed to making the strategic decisions that not only streamline operations, but also enhance its ability to serve its customers. The Company remains confident in its ability to continue to execute on cost-reduction initiatives, deliver solutions that help improve customers’ businesses and create shareholder value. In December 2009, the Company announced it is realigning its organization and resources to better support opportunities in the emerging growth markets, resulting in the elimination of approximately 350 full-time jobs from its North America operations and corporate functions and a fourth quarter 2009 charge of approximately $9,500. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010, the Company incurred pre-tax net restructuring charges of $483 or $0.01 per share and $2,793 or $0.03 per share, respectively, primarily related to reductions in the Company’s global workforce. During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009, the Company incurred pre-tax restructuring charges of $1,772 or $0.02 per share and $10,228 or $0.11 per share, respectively, primarily related to the sale of certain assets and liabilities in Argentina, strategic global manufacturing realignment and reductions in the Company’s global workforce.

D&O insurance carriers of approximately $6,900 of previously incurred legal and other expenditures related to the government investigations. In June 2010, the SEC finalized the settlement of civil charges stemming from the government investigations. The Company had previously reached an agreement in principle in 2009 with the staff of the SEC and the Company accrued a $25,000 penalty in the first quarter of 2009, which was paid in June 2010. Net non-routine expenses in 2009, consisted of $1,328 in legal and other consultation fees recorded in selling and administrative expense related to the government investigations and a $25,000 charge, recorded in miscellaneous, net, related to the 2009 agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC to settle civil charges. In addition, in 2009 selling and administrative expense was offset by $11,323 of non-routine income, primarily related to reimbursements from the Company’s D&O insurance carriers related to legal and other expenses incurred as part of the government investigations.

Out-of-Period Adjustment

Business Drivers

The business drivers of the Company’s future performance include, but are not limited to:

	•		demand for new service offerings, including integrated services and outsourcing;

	•		demand for security products and services for the financial, enterprise, retail and government sectors;

	•		timing of a self-service upgrade and/or replacement cycle, including deposit automation in mature markets such as the United States; and

	•		high levels of deployment growth for new self-service products in emerging markets, such as Asia Pacific.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations provides information that will assist in understanding the financial statements and the changes in certain key items in those financial statements. Comments on significant fluctuations follow the table. The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial statements and the accompanying notes that appear elsewhere in this quarterly report.


	Three Months Ended									Nine Months Ended
	September 30,									September 30,
	2010				2009					2010				2009
			% of					% of				% of					% of
	Dollars		Net sales		Dollars			Net sales		Dollars		Net sales		Dollars			Net sales
Net sales	$	748,620		100.0	$	645,222			100.0	$	2,032,799		100.0	$	1,993,369			100.0
Gross profit		193,894		25.9		152,209			23.6		530,048		26.1		473,446			23.8
Operating expenses		141,515		18.9		121,039			18.8		390,229		19.2		351,192			17.6
Operating profit		52,379		7.0		31,170			4.8		139,819		6.9		122,254			6.1
Income from continuing operations		45,434		6.1		25,237			3.9		101,699		5.0		69,347			3.5
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax		2,043				(31,641	)				390				(40,280	)
Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		1,372				751					2,329				4,144
Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated		46,105				(7,155	)				99,760				24,923

Diluted earnings per share:
Net income from continuing operations	$	0.66			$	0.37				$	1.49			$	0.98
Income (loss) from discontinued operations		0.03				(0.48	)				0.01				(0.61	)

Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	0.69			$	(0.11	)			$	1.50			$	0.37

Third Quarter 2010 Comparisons with Third Quarter 2009

Net Sales

The following table represents information regarding our net sales:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Net sales	$	748,620	$	645,222	$	103,398		16.0

Financial self-service sales in the third quarter of 2010 increased by $25,399 or 5.2 percent compared to the same period of 2009. The increase in financial self-service sales included a net favorable currency impact of $7,325, of which $7,494 related to the Brazilian real. Additionally, Brazil increased by $4,651 or 4.0 percent due to increased volume. North America increased $31,055 or 17.2 percent due to higher volume in the U.S. national and regional bank businesses. Europe, Middle East and Africa (EMEA) increased $14,447 or 21.5 percent on a fixed-rate basis, due to sales in the third quarter of 2010 within Turkey. Asia Pacific decreased $33,847 or 35.4 percent on a fixed rate basis. The decrease in Asia Pacific was due to lower volume in India and Indonesia, as well as the out-of-period adjustment in the third quarter of 2010 which decreased net sales by $18,688.

Security solutions sales in the third quarter of 2010 decreased by $5,254 or 3.3 percent compared to the same period of 2009. North America decreased $6,745 or 4.7 percent due primarily to the lack of new bank branch construction as a result of the continued weakness in demand for security products in the U.S. financial market.

Brazilian-based election systems sales were $76,997 in the third quarter of 2010 compared to none in the same period of 2009. This business has historically been cyclical, recurring every other year. Lottery systems sales increased $6,256 in the third quarter of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009.

Gross Profit

The following table represents information regarding our gross profit:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				$ Change/
	2010		2009		% Point Change		% Change
Gross profit – products	$	91,854	$	59,635	$	32,219		54.0
Gross profit – services		102,040		92,574		9,466		10.2

Total gross profit	$	193,894	$	152,209	$	41,685		27.4

Total gross profit margin		25.9%		23.6%		2.3

Product gross margin was 24.7 percent in the third quarter of 2010 compared to 21.4 percent in the same period of 2009. The increase in product margin resulted primarily from a more favorable customer and geographic mix particularly in the Americas. In the third quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment which negatively impacted product gross margin by $5,270.

Service gross margin was 27.1 percent in the third quarter of 2010 compared to 25.3 percent in the same period of 2009. The service margin improvement was driven by continued improvements in product reliability and productivity. Additionally, the third quarter of 2010 included restructuring charges of $35 compared to $536 in the same period of 2009. The third quarter 2010 restructuring charges related to workforce reductions and charges in the third quarter of 2009 related to workforce reductions and service branch consolidation.

Operating Expenses

The following table represents information regarding our operating expenses:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Selling and administrative expense	$	119,425	$	103,624	$	15,801		15.2
Research, development, and engineering expense		19,090		17,415		1,675		9.6
Impairment of assets		3,000		—		3,000		N/A

Total operating expenses	$	141,515	$	121,039	$	20,476		16.9

Selling and administrative expense in the third quarter of 2010 was impacted by higher healthcare and pension expenses, higher selling expense related to increased sales volume, and higher legal and consulting expenses associated with remediation and compliance efforts.

Research, development, and engineering expense as a percent of net sales was flat to prior year as increased investment in research and development in the third quarter of 2010 was paralleled with higher revenue.

In the third quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $3,000 other than temporary impairment related to a cost-method investment. The Company determined this investment was fully impaired as of September 30, 2010 due to a decline in fair value.

Operating Profit

The following table represents information regarding our operating profit:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				$ Change/
	2010		2009		% Point Change		% Change
Operating profit	$	52,379	$	31,170	$	21,209		68.0
Operating profit margin		7.0%		4.8%		2.2

The increase in operating profit was due to higher product and service gross profit. These increases were partially offset by higher operating expenses and the impairment in the third quarter of 2010.

Other Income (Expense)

The following table represents information regarding our other income (expense):


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009			$ Change			% Change
Investment income	$	10,487		$	8,344		$	2,143			25.7
Interest expense		(9,631	)		(8,223	)		(1,408	)		17.1
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net		5,428			(1,260	)		6,688			N/M
Miscellaneous, net		1,915			(709	)		2,624			N/M

Other income (expense)	$	8,199		$	(1,848	)	$	10,047			N/M

Investment income increased $2,143 due to interest received on a legal settlement related to overdue receivables in Brazil and increased leasing interest income. Interest expense increased due to higher interest rates and a credit facility fee in the third quarter of 2010 of $865. The improvement in foreign exchange was due to favorability across all regions.

Income from Continuing Operations

The following table represents information regarding our income from continuing operations:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,				$ Change/
	2010		2009		% Point Change		% Change
Income from continuing operations	$	45,434	$	25,237	$	20,197		80.0
Percent of net sales		6.1		3.9		2.2
Effective tax rate		25.0%		13.9%		11.1

The increase in net income from continuing operations was driven by higher sales and higher gross margins in both product and service as well as favorable movements within other income/expense. These increases were partially offset by higher operating expenses. The 11.1 percentage point increase in the effective tax rate was due to a higher percentage of income generated in regions with higher statutory tax rates, certain foreign income subject to tax in the United States and tax benefits related to the U.S. research and development credit and certain “look-through” rules that expired in 2010.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

The following table represents information regarding our income (loss) from discontinued operations:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009			$ Change		% Change
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	2,043	$	(31,641	)	$	33,684		N/M

Third quarter 2010 income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, included costs primarily related to the sale of the U.S. elections systems business. The Company finalized and filed its consolidated U.S. federal tax return during the third quarter of 2010 and recorded an additional tax benefit of $2,147. Included in the third quarter 2009 loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, was the sale of the U.S.-based elections systems business which resulted in a loss, net of tax, of $31,438. Refer to note 16 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of discontinued operations.

Net Income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated

The following table represents information regarding our net income:


	Three Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009			$ Change		% Change
Net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	46,105	$	(7,155	)	$	53,260		N/M

Based on the results from continuing and discontinued operations discussed above, the Company reported net income (loss) attributable to Diebold, Incorporated of $46,105 and ($7,155) for the three months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Segment Analysis and Operating Profit Summary

In the first quarter of 2010, the Company began management of its businesses on a geographic basis, changing from the previous model of sales channel segments. In order to align the Company’s external reporting of its financial results with this organizational change, the Company has modified its segment reporting. The Company now reports the following two segments: Diebold North America (DNA) and DI. DNA net sales of $349,673 for the third quarter of 2010 increased $24,310 or 7.5 percent compared to the same period of 2009. The increase in DNA net sales was due to increased product volume in the national businesses and an increase in service revenue. DI net sales of $398,947 for the third quarter of 2010 increased by $79,088 or 24.7 percent compared to the same period of 2009, primarily due to higher volume in Brazil due mainly to elections systems revenue. There were additional increases in net sales in EMEA and Latin America. The DI increase included a net favorable currency impact of $7,306 of which $7,596 related to the Brazilian real. These increases were partially offset by lower revenue in Asia Pacific due in part to the out-of-period adjustment of $18,688 recorded in the third quarter of 2010.

DNA operating profit for the third quarter of 2010 increased by $14,726 or 75.3 percent compared to the same period of 2009. Operating profit was favorably affected by higher product sales volume and margin performance, partially offset by higher operating expenses. DI operating profit for the third quarter of 2010 increased by $6,483 or 55.8 percent compared to the same period of 2009. The increase in DI operating profit resulted from Brazilian elections systems sales offset by higher operating expenses and the out of period adjustment.

Refer to note 15 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of segment revenue and operating profit.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 Comparisons with Nine Months Ended September 30, 2009

Net Sales

The following table represents information regarding our net sales:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Net sales	$	2,032,799	$	1,993,369	$	39,430		2.0

Financial self-service sales in the first nine months of 2010 decreased by $68,862 or 4.5 percent compared to the same period of 2009. The decrease in financial self-service sales included a net favorable currency impact of $66,405, of which $53,132 related to the Brazilian real. Additionally, Brazil decreased by $64,714 or 17.2 percent due to declines in volume. North America decreased $44,321 or 7.2 percent due to reduced volume in the U.S. national bank business as the first nine months of 2009 included a large project for a customer that upgraded the majority of its ATM install base with our deposit automation solution. The project began in the second half of 2008 and was completed in the second quarter of 2009. Asia Pacific decreased $30,563 or 11.5 percent due to lower volume and as the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment in the third quarter of 2010 to decrease net sales by $19,822.

Security solutions sales in the first nine months of 2010 decreased by $21,295 or 4.5 percent compared to the same period of 2009. North America decreased $30,671 or 7.1 percent due primarily to the lack of new bank branch construction as a result of the continued weakness in the U.S. financial market. In addition, the decrease in North America resulted from volume declines in the retail and government markets. Asia Pacific increased $7,050 or 46.2 percent from the first nine months of 2009 due to continued business development and favorable currency impact.

Brazilian-based election systems sales were $123,215 in the first nine months of 2010 compared to none in the same period of 2009. This business has historically been cyclical, with Brazilian elections recurring every other year. Lottery systems sales increased $6,372 in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009.

Gross Profit

The following table represents information regarding our gross profit:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				$ Change/
	2010		2009		% Point Change		% Change
Gross profit – products	$	234,464	$	213,874	$	20,590		9.6
Gross profit – services		295,584		259,572		36,012		13.9

Total gross profit	$	530,048	$	473,446	$	56,602		12.0

Total gross profit margin		26.1%		23.8%		2.3

Product gross margin was 25.3 percent in the first nine months of 2010 compared to 23.7 percent in the same period of 2009. The increase in product margin resulted from favorable product solution and customer mix. Additionally, product gross margin in the first nine months of 2010 included restructuring charges of $787 compared to $3,104 in the same period of 2009. Restructuring charges in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009 primarily related to global manufacturing realignment and workforce reductions. This favorability was partially offset by the third quarter 2010 out-of-period adjustment, which negatively impacted product gross margin by $5,753.

Service gross margin was 26.8 percent in the first nine months of 2010 compared to 23.8 percent in the same period of 2009. The service margin improvement was driven by improved productivity and lower service parts scrap expenses. Service margin was also favorably impacted by higher margin performance in Asia Pacific. Additionally, the first nine months of 2010 included net restructuring benefits of $175 compared to restructuring charges of $3,936 in the first nine months of 2009. The first nine months of 2010 net restructuring benefits related primarily to accrual adjustments within the workforce reduction plans. Restructuring charges in the first nine months of 2009 related to workforce reductions and service branch consolidation, as well as employee severance costs in connection with the Company’s sale of certain assets and liabilities in Argentina.

Operating Expenses

The following table represents information regarding our operating expenses:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Selling and administrative expense	$	329,193	$	300,989	$	28,204		9.4
Research, development, and engineering expense		53,940		50,203		3,737		7.4
Impairment of assets		7,096		—		7,096		N/A

Total operating expenses	$	390,229	$	351,192	$	39,037		11.1

Selling and administrative expense in the first nine months of 2010 was unfavorably impacted by $8,609 of net currency fluctuations, lower expense reimbursements, higher legal and consulting fees, as well as increased healthcare and pension expenses. Selling and administrative expense in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009 included expense reimbursements of $4,147 and $11,323, respectively, from the Company’s D&O insurance carriers related to legal and other expenses incurred as part of the settled government investigations. In addition, selling and administrative expense included $2,336 and $3,086 of restructuring charges in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The 2010 restructuring charges related to workforce reductions. The 2009 restructuring charges primarily related to workforce reductions, employee severance costs in connection with the Company’s sale of certain assets and liabilities in Argentina, and service branch consolidation.

Research, development, and engineering expense as a percent of net sales in the first nine months of 2010 and 2009 was 2.7 percent and 2.5 percent, respectively. This increase resulted from incremental investment in research and development. Additionally, research, development and engineering expense was unfavorably impacted by $1,372 of net currency fluctuations.

In the third quarter of 2010, the Company recorded a $3,000 other than temporary impairment related to a cost method investment. The Company determined this investment was fully impaired as of September 30, 2010 due to a decline in fair value. In addition, an impairment charge of $4,096 was incurred in the first nine months of 2010 related to intangible assets of TFE Technology Holdings (TFE). The customer contract intangible assets related to this acquisition were fully impaired in the second quarter of 2010.

Operating Profit

The following table represents information regarding our operating profit:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,				$ Change/
	2010		2009		% Point Change		% Change
Operating profit	$	139,819	$	122,254	$	17,565		14.4
Operating profit margin		6.9%		6.1%		0.8

The increase in operating profit was due to favorable product revenue mix and higher service gross profit due to productivity improvements in U.S. service. These increases were partially offset by increased operating expenses and impairment charges in the first nine months of 2010.

Other Income (Expense)

The following table represents information regarding our other income (expense):


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009			$ Change			% Change
Investment income	$	23,976		$	21,171		$	2,805			13.2
Interest expense		(27,987	)		(25,968	)		(2,019	)		7.8
Foreign exchange gain (loss), net		234			(3,058	)		3,292			N/M
Miscellaneous, net		4,016			(24,095	)		28,111			N/M

Other income (expense)	$	239		$	(31,950	)	$	32,189			N/M

The increase in investment income resulted from a legal settlement in Brazil that included interest and higher leasing interest income. Interest expense increased due to higher interest rates between years and credit facility fees in 2010, partially offset by lower hedging expense. The improvement in foreign exchange gain (loss), net resulted from favorable fluctuations in EMEA and Asia Pacific, partially offset by the currency devaluation in Venezuela. The change in miscellaneous, net was largely due to a charge of $25,000 in the first nine months of 2009 as the Company reached an agreement in principle with the staff of the SEC to settle civil charges. In June 2010, the SEC settlement was finalized and paid.

Income from Continuing Operations

The following table represents information regarding our income from continuing operations:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						$ Change/
	2010			2009			% Point Change		% Change
Income from continuing operations	$	101,699		$	69,347		$	32,352		46.7
Percent of net sales		5.0			3.5			1.5
Effective tax rate		27.4	%		23.2	%		4.2

The increase in net income from continuing operations was related to the 2009 SEC charge of $25,000 as well as higher gross profit, partially offset by higher operating expenses inclusive of the impairment charges in first nine months of 2010. The 4.2 percentage point increase in the effective tax rate was due to a higher percentage of income generated in regions with higher statutory tax rates, certain foreign income subject to tax in the United States and tax benefits related to the U.S. research and development credit and certain “look-through” rules that expired in 2010.

Income (Loss) from Discontinued Operations

The following table represents information regarding our income (loss) from discontinued operations:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009			$ Change		% Change
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	390	$	(40,280	)	$	40,670		N/M

Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax, for the first nine months of 2010 included costs primarily related to the sale of the U.S.-based elections systems business. The Company finalized and filed its consolidated U.S. federal tax return during the third quarter of 2010 and recorded an additional tax benefit of $2,147 included within income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax. Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax, for the first nine months of 2009 included the sale of the U.S. elections systems business which resulted in a loss, net of tax of $31,438. Losses from discontinued operations, net of tax for the first nine months of 2009 were $8,842. Refer to note 16 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of discontinued operations.

Net Income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated

The following table represents information regarding our net income:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010		2009		$ Change		% Change
Net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated	$	99,760	$	24,923	$	74,837		300.3

Based on the results from continuing and discontinued operations discussed above, the Company reported net income attributable to Diebold, Incorporated of $99,760 and $24,923 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Segment Analysis and Operating Profit Summary

DNA net sales of $968,508 for the first nine months of 2010 decreased 74,992 or 7.2 percent compared to the same period of 2009. The decrease in DNA net sales was due to decreased product volume in the national and regional businesses, as well as the corresponding installation revenue, partially offset by increased U.S. service volume. DI net sales of $1,064,291 for the first nine months of 2010 increased by $114,422 or 12.0 percent compared to the same period of 2009, which included a net favorable currency fluctuation of $65,962, of which $53,744 related to the Brazilian real. The increase in DI net sales was driven by higher volume in Brazil and Latin America. These increases were partially offset by lower volume in Asia Pacific as well as the out-of-period adjustment of $19,822 recorded in the third quarter of 2010.

DNA operating profit for the first nine months of 2010 decreased by $1,257 or 1.8 percent compared to the same period of 2009. Operating profit was unfavorably affected by lower product volume related to the regional business as well as an overall decrease in installation revenue. Additionally, DNA operating profit was unfavorably impacted by higher operating expenses, a $3,000 impairment charge related to a cost-method investment in the third quarter of 2010 and a $4,096 impairment charge related to customer contract intangible assets of TFE in the second quarter of 2010. The Company determined this investment was fully impaired as of September 30, 2010 due to a decline in fair value. These decreases to DNA operating profit were partially offset by higher service profitability attributable to continued productivity gains and lower service parts scrap expense. DNA operating profit was also favorably affected by higher product margin in the national business. DI operating profit for the first nine months of 2010 increased by $18,822 or 34.9 percent compared to the same period of 2009. Increased product gross profit resulted from Brazilian election systems volume in 2010 partially offset by lower financial self-service revenue. Increased service gross profit was due to improved performance in Asia Pacific partially offset by lower managed service volume in Brazil. These increases were partially offset by an increase in operating expenses and the out-of-period adjustment of $5,753 recorded in the third quarter of 2010.

Refer to note 15 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further details of segment revenue and operating profit.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Capital resources are obtained from income retained in the business, borrowings under the Company’s senior notes, committed and uncommitted credit facilities, long-term industrial revenue bonds, and operating and capital leasing arrangements. Management expects that the Company’s capital resources will be sufficient to finance planned working capital needs, research and development activities, investments in facilities or equipment, pension contributions, dividends and the purchase of the Company’s shares for at least the next 12 months. A substantial portion of cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments reside in international tax jurisdictions. Repatriation of these funds could be negatively impacted by potential foreign and domestic taxes. Part of the Company’s growth strategy is to pursue strategic acquisitions. The Company has made acquisitions in the past and intends to make acquisitions in the future. The Company intends to finance any future acquisitions with either cash and short-term investments, cash provided from operations, borrowings under available credit facilities, proceeds from debt or equity offerings and/or the issuance of common shares.

The following table summarizes the results of our condensed consolidated statement of cash flows:


	Nine Months Ended
	September 30,
	2010			2009
Net cash flow (used in) provided by:
Operating activities	$	51,073		$	121,003
Investing activities		(85,531	)		(74,413	)
Financing activities		(51,569	)		(87,189	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		(2,576	)		1,921

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(88,603	)	$	(38,678	)

Net cash provided by operating activities was $51,073 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $69,930 from $121,003 for the same period in 2009. Cash flows from operating activities are generated primarily from operating income and managing the components of working capital. Cash flows from operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were negatively affected by the payment of the $25,000 SEC settlement in June 2010. Additionally, cash flows from operating activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 were negatively affected by changes in trade receivables, inventories, other current assets and deferred revenue, partially offset by a $73,022 increase in net income and favorable changes in accounts payable, refundable income taxes and certain other assets and liabilities.

Net cash used in investing activities was $85,531 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, an increase of $11,118 from $74,413 for the same period in 2009. The increase was primarily due to a $146,711 increase in payments for purchases of investments, an increase of $18,939 in payments for purchases of finance receivables and an increase of $9,577 in capital expenditures. These activities were partially offset by a $159,225 increase in net proceeds from maturities and sale of investments in the first nine months of 2010 compared to the same period of 2009.

Net cash used in financing activities was $51,569 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010, a decrease of $35,620 from $87,189 for the same period of 2009. The decrease was primarily due to a $59,335 change in net debt activity, moving to net borrowings of $26,387 in 2010 from net repayments of $32,948 in 2009. This was partially offset by $23,431 cash used to repurchase common shares during the first nine months of 2010.

The effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents for the nine months included September 30, 2010 included $5,700 of devaluation related to Venezuela.

Dividends
The Company paid dividends of $53,989 and $52,077 in the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Quarterly dividends were $0.27 and $0.26 per share for 2010 and 2009, respectively.

Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
All contractual cash obligations with initial and remaining terms in excess of one year and contingent liabilities remained generally unchanged at September 30, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009. The Company does not participate in transactions that facilitate off balance sheet arrangements.

In October 2009, the Company entered into a three-year credit facility. As of September 30, 2010, the Company had borrowing limits totaling $502,240 ($400,000 and €75,000, translated) under this facility. Under the terms of the credit facility agreement, the Company has the ability, subject to various approvals, to increase the borrowing limits by $200,000 and €37,500. Up to $30,000 and €15,000 of the revolving credit facility is available under a swing line subfacility. The amount available under the credit facility at September 30, 2010 was $209,190.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES

Management’s discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial condition and results of operations are based upon the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. The preparation of these financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events. These estimates and the underlying assumptions affect the amounts of assets and liabilities reported, disclosures about contingent assets and liabilities and reported amounts of revenues and expenses. Such estimates include the value of purchase consideration, valuation of trade receivables, inventories, goodwill, intangible assets, other long-lived assets, legal contingencies, guarantee obligations, indemnifications and assumptions used in the calculation of income taxes, pension and postretirement benefits and customer incentives, among others. These estimates and assumptions are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Management evaluates its estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic difficulties in the U.S. credit markets and the global markets. Management monitors the economic conditions and other factors and will adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Illiquid credit markets, volatile foreign currency and equity, and declines in the global economic environment have combined to increase the uncertainty inherent in such estimates and assumptions. As future events and their effects cannot be determined with precision, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. Changes in those estimates resulting from continuing changes in the economic environment will be reflected in the financial statements in future periods.

Management believes there have been no significant changes, except for those discussed below, during the nine months ended September 30, 2010 to the items that the Company disclosed as its critical accounting policies and estimates in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

The Company’s critical accounting policies as reported in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 were amended in the first quarter of 2010 upon the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2009-13, Multiple-Deliverable Revenue Arrangements (ASU 2009-13), and FASB ASU 2009-14, Certain Arrangements That Include Software Elements (ASU 2009-14). On January 1, 2010, the Company elected to early adopt ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14, which did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. However, the adoption of ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 modifies the Company’s previously disclosed revenue recognition policy, which is presented below as revised. ASU 2009-14 amends software revenue recognition guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 985-605, Software — Revenue Recognition (ASC 985-605), to exclude from its scope the Company’s tangible products that contain both software and non-software components that function together to deliver a product’s essential functionality. ASU 2009-13 modifies the requirements that must be met for the Company to recognize revenue from the sale of a delivered item that is part of a multiple-deliverable arrangement when other items have not yet been delivered. ASU 2009-13 establishes a selling price hierarchy for determining the selling price of a deliverable in a multiple-deliverable arrangement. The selling price must be based on vendor specific objective evidence (VSOE), if available, or third-party evidence (TPE) if VSOE is not available, or estimated selling price if neither VSOE nor TPE is available. Also, the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration has been eliminated.

ASU 2009-13 and ASU 2009-14 were applied on a prospective basis for revenue arrangements entered into or materially modified after adoption. There were no changes to the Company’s units of accounting within its multiple-deliverable arrangements, how the Company allocates arrangement consideration or in the pattern or timing of revenue recognition as a result of the adoption of these updates.

For product sales, the Company determines that the earnings process is complete when title, risk of loss and the right to use equipment has transferred to the customer. Within the North America business segment, this occurs upon customer acceptance. Where the Company is contractually responsible for installation, customer acceptance occurs upon completion of the installation of all items at a job site and the Company’s demonstration that the items are in operable condition. Where the Company is not contractually responsible for installation, revenue recognition of these items is upon shipment or delivery to a customer location depending on the terms in the contract. Within the international business segment, customer acceptance is upon the earlier of delivery or completion of the installation depending on the terms in the contract with the customer. The Company has the following revenue streams related to sales to its customers:

Financial Self-Service Product & Integrated Services Revenue Financial self-service products pertain to ATMs. Included with the ATM is a software component and a non-software component that function together to deliver the ATM’s essential functionality. The Company also provides service contracts on ATMs. Service contracts typically cover a 12-month period and can begin at any given month after the warranty period expires. The service provided under warranty is limited as compared to those offered under service contracts. Further, warranty is not considered a separate deliverable of the sale. The Company’s warranty covers only replacement of defective parts inclusive of labor. Service contracts are tailored to meet the individual needs of each customer. Service contracts provide additional services beyond those covered under the warranty, and usually include preventative maintenance service, cleaning, supplies stocking and cash handling, all of which are not essential to the functionality of the equipment. Outsourced and managed services include remote monitoring, trouble-shooting for self-service customers, training, transaction processing, currency management, maintenance services and full support via person to person or online communication.

Revenue is recognized in accordance with ASC 605, the application of which requires judgment including the determination of whether an arrangement includes multiple deliverables. For stand-alone sales of service contracts, revenue is recognized ratably over the life of the contract period. In contracts that involve multiple-deliverable arrangements, product maintenance services are typically accounted for under FASB ASC 605-20, Separately Priced Extended Warranty Product Maintenance Contracts (ASC 605-20). Amounts deferred for undelivered items are determined based upon the selling price of the deliverables as prescribed in FASB ASC 605-25, Revenue Recognition — Multiple-Element Arrangements (ASC 605-25). The Company determines the selling price of deliverables within a multiple-deliverable arrangement based on VSOE (price when sold on stand-alone basis) or the estimated selling price where VSOE is not established for undelivered items. Total arrangement consideration is allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable’s selling price. There have been no material changes to these estimates for the periods presented and the Company believes that these estimates generally should not be subject to significant changes in the future. However, changes to the deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish the selling price could materially impact the amount of earned or deferred revenue.

allocated at the inception of the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any discount in the arrangement proportionately to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverable’s selling price. There have been no material changes to these estimates for the periods presented and the Company believes that these estimates generally should not be subject to significant changes in the future. However, changes to deliverables in future arrangements and the ability to establish the selling price could materially impact the amount of earned or deferred revenue.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING GUIDANCE

In July 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU 2010-20). ASU 2010-20 updates FASB ASC 310, Receivables. This update requires additional disclosures to assist financial statement users in assessing the nature of credit risk in an entity’s financing receivables, how that risk is analyzed in determining the related allowance for credit losses, and changes to the allowance during the reporting period. ASU 2010-20 is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2010. The adoption of this update will not have an impact on the financial statements of the Company; however, the Company will provide additional disclosure as required by ASU 2010-20.

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT DISCLOSURE

In this quarterly report on Form 10-Q, statements that are not reported financial results or other historical information are “forward-looking statements.” Forward-looking statements give current expectations or forecasts of future events and are not guarantees of future performance. These forward-looking statements relate to, among other things, the Company’s future operating performance, the Company’s share of new and existing markets, the Company’s short- and long-term revenue and earnings growth rates, the Company’s implementation of cost-reduction initiatives and measures to improve pricing, including the optimization of the Company’s manufacturing capacity. The use of the words “will,” “believes,” “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends” and similar expressions is intended to identify forward-looking statements that have been made and may in the future be made by or on behalf of the Company.

Although the Company believes that these forward-looking statements are based upon reasonable assumptions regarding, among other things, the economy, its knowledge of its business, and on key performance indicators that impact the Company, these forward-looking statements involve risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements. The Company is not obligated to update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.

Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Some of the risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in or implied by the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

•		competitive pressures, including pricing pressures and technological developments;

•		changes in the Company’s relationships with customers, suppliers, distributors and/or partners in its business ventures;

•		changes in political, economic or other factors such as currency exchange rates, inflation rates, recessionary or expansive trends, taxes and regulations and laws affecting the worldwide business in each of the Company’s operations, including Brazil, where a significant portion of the Company’s revenue is derived;

•		the Company’s ability to take actions to mitigate the effect of the Venezuelan currency devaluation, further devaluation, actions of the Venezuelan government, and economic conditions in Venezuela;

•		the continuing effects of the recent economic downturn and the disruptions in the financial markets, including the bankruptcies, restructurings or consolidations of financial institutions, which could reduce our customer base and/or adversely affect our customers’ ability to make capital expenditures, as well as adversely impact the availability and cost of credit;

•		acceptance of the Company’s product and technology introductions in the marketplace;

•		the amount of cash and non-cash charges in connection with the restructuring of the Company’s North America operations and corporate functions, and the closure of the Company’s Newark, Ohio facility;

•		changes in the Company’s intention to repatriate cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments residing in international tax jurisdictions could negatively impact foreign and domestic taxes;

•		unanticipated litigation, claims or assessments, as well as the impact of any current or threatened lawsuits;

•		variations in consumer demand for financial self-service technologies, products and services;

•		potential security violations to the Company’s information technology systems;

•		the investment performance of the Company’s pension plan assets, which could require us to increase the Company’s pension contributions, and significant changes in health care costs, including those that may result from government action such as the recently enacted U.S. health care legislation;

•		the outcome of the Company’s global Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) review and any actions taken by government agencies in connection with the Company’s self disclosure;

•		the Company’s ability to achieve benefits from its cost-reduction initiatives and other strategic changes; and

•		the Company’s ability to successfully remediate its material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting and to maintain effective internal controls.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company is exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risk inherent in its international operations denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. A hypothetical 10 percent movement in the applicable foreign exchange rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease in operating profit of approximately $11,265 and $7,522 for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The sensitivity model assumes an instantaneous, parallel shift in the foreign currency exchange rates. Exchange rates rarely move in the same direction. The assumption that exchange rates change in an instantaneous or parallel fashion may overstate the impact of changing exchange rates on amounts denominated in a foreign currency.

The Company’s risk-management strategy uses derivative financial instruments such as forwards to hedge certain foreign currency exposures. The intent is to offset gains and losses that occur on the underlying exposures, with gains and losses on the derivative contracts hedging these exposures. The Company does not enter into derivatives for trading purposes. The Company’s primary exposures to foreign exchange risk are movements in the euro/dollar, pound/dollar and dollar/franc. There were no significant changes in the Company’s foreign exchange risks in the first nine months of 2010 compared with 2009.

The Company manages interest rate risk with the use of variable rate borrowings under its committed and uncommitted credit facilities and interest rate swaps. Variable rate borrowings under the credit facilities totaled $305,562 at September 30, 2010, of which $50,000 was effectively converted to fixed rate using interest rate swaps. A one percentage point increase or decrease in interest rates would have resulted in an increase or decrease in interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2010 and 2009 of approximately $1,860 and 2,149, respectively, including the impact of the swap agreements. The Company’s primary exposure to interest rate risk is movements in London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR), which is consistent with prior periods. As discussed in note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company hedged $200,000 of the fixed rate borrowings under its private placement agreement, which was treated as a cash flow hedge. This reduced the effective interest rate by 14 basis points from 5.50 to 5.36 percent.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010

ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

This quarterly report includes the certifications of our chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO) required by Rule 13a-14 of the Exchange Act. See Exhibits 31.1 and 31.2. This Item 4 includes information concerning the controls and control evaluations referred to in those certifications.

Based on the performance of procedures by management, designed to ensure the reliability of financial reporting, management believes that the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements fairly present, in all material respects, the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows as of the dates, and for the periods presented. Refer to Note 1 in the notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the CEO and CFO as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

In connection with the preparation of this quarterly report, management, under the supervision and with the participation of the CEO and CFO, conducted an evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures, including the remedial actions described below, as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, certain material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, as discussed in detail below and disclosed in previous filings, have not been remediated. As a result, the CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of September 30, 2010, and through the filing of this quarterly report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective due to material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting, as discussed in detail below. As described in detail throughout this Item 4, management continues to take actions to remediate material weaknesses in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

The Company continues to use the management certification process to identify matters that might require disclosure and to encourage transparency and accountability with respect to the accuracy of the Company’s disclosures in order to strengthen disclosure controls and procedures. This process requires multiple levels of management to provide sub-certifications, all of which are aggregated and reported to the CEO and CFO for assessment prior to filing the quarterly condensed consolidated financial statements. The Company utilized this process in preparing this quarterly report.

Management notes that the following previously identified control deficiencies constitute material weaknesses as of September 30, 2010:

Selection, Application and Communication of Accounting Policies: The previously reported material weakness relating to application of accounting policies is not considered remediated as the Company did not appropriately apply the revenue recognition policy for training and maintenance services in certain international entities. Based on a review of an accrued liability account that is used to record the commitment to provide these services, it was noted that the services were not properly identified and accounted for as separate deliverables in multiple-deliverable arrangements at inception. This misapplication of the revenue recognition policy is a result of insufficient knowledge of U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) to properly identify and account for multiple-deliverable arrangements. This control deficiency resulted in errors that were noted during the execution of account reconciliation control procedures. Although none of these errors were material, either individually or in the aggregate, and these errors did not result in adjustments to the financial statements, management has concluded that the related control deficiency constitutes a material weakness since it is reasonably possible that these errors could have been material.

Controls over Income Taxes: During 2009, management determined that control procedures were not effective related to providing adequate review and oversight of the calculation of the income tax provision. These control deficiencies resulted in errors that required out-of-period adjustments in the Company’s 2009 tax provision. Although none of these errors were material, either individually or in the aggregate, management has concluded that the related control deficiencies constitute a material weakness since it is reasonably possible that these errors could have been material.

CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

As previously reported under Item 9A — Controls and Procedures in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, management concluded that the internal control over financial reporting was not effective based on the material weaknesses identified. Management has continued to work on remediation efforts since the filing of that report. During the quarter ended September 30, 2010, there were no changes in internal control that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010

REMEDIATION STEPS TO ADDRESS MATERIAL WEAKNESSES

Management is committed to remediating its remaining material weaknesses in a timely fashion. Management’s Sarbanes-Oxley compliance function is responsible for helping to monitor short-term and long-term remediation plans. In addition, the Company has an executive owner to direct the necessary remedial changes to the overall design of its internal control over financial reporting and to address the root causes of the material weaknesses. The leadership team is committed to achieving and maintaining a strong control environment, high ethical standards and financial reporting integrity. This commitment will continue to be communicated to and reinforced with all associates.

The remediation efforts, outlined below, are intended to address the identified material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting.

Selection, Application and Communication of Accounting Policies:
During the third quarter of 2010, management implemented control processes related to the identification and accounting for the deliverables in multiple-deliverable arrangements in accordance with the Company’s revenue recognition policy. As part of the new control process design, a comprehensive “Revenue Recognition Template,” tailored to the specific terms and conditions in the Company’s sales contracts, was utilized to facilitate finance management with completing and documenting detailed sales contract reviews. This control process includes a comprehensive review of each of the relevant terms and conditions in the Company’s arrangements along with documentation of the impact on revenue recognition, if applicable.

During the third quarter of 2010, the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment to defer revenue previously recognized that was not in accordance with GAAP. The immaterial out-of-period adjustment was recorded within the Company’s operations in China, included in the DI reporting segment. The adjustment decreased revenue related to multiple-deliverable contracts that included revenue which was contingent upon the installation of the equipment. This deferred revenue will be recognized upon completion of installation. The out-of-period adjustment for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2010 represents a decrease in revenue of $18,688 and $19,822, respectively and a decrease to operating profit of $5,270 and $5,753, respectively.

Throughout the remainder of 2010, management will continue to refine its control processes related to multiple-deliverable arrangements to assure these controls are operating effectively. In addition, management plans to assess its finance organization to assure there are resources with sufficient knowledge to properly apply the revenue recognition policy going forward and to assure the proper management oversight of the recording and reporting of the Company’s multiple-deliverable arrangements globally.

At this time, the Company anticipates this material weakness will be remediated by the end of 2010.

Controls over Income Taxes:
During the third quarter of 2010, management, with the assistance of third party consultants, continued activities in its remediation plan to address the root causes of the tax material weakness. These ongoing activities include:

•

Performing a focused review of tax balance sheet accounts within foreign entities;

•

Accelerating key activities to be completed in the annual tax provision process and increasing the level of senior finance management review of the tax provision;

•

Enhancing and expanding key controls for greater accuracy and completeness in the tax provision process and sub-processes;

•

Analyzing and revising the Company’s tax ledger accounts in order to deploy standardized, tax-sensitized trial balances; and

•

Redefining roles and responsibilities in the corporate tax organization and expanding the tax organization to address resource constraints.

At this time, the Company anticipates this material weakness will be remediated by the end of 2010.

The Company’s management believes the remediation measures described above will remediate the identified control deficiencies and strengthen the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. As management continues to evaluate and work to improve its internal control over financial reporting, it may be determined that additional measures must be taken to address control deficiencies or it may be determined that the Company needs to modify, or in appropriate circumstances not to complete, certain of the remediation measures.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

(Dollars in thousands)

At September 30, 2010, the Company was a party to several lawsuits that were incurred in the normal course of business, none of which individually or in the aggregate is considered material by management in relation to the Company’s financial position or results of operations. In management’s opinion, the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements would not be materially affected by the outcome of any present legal proceedings, commitments, or asserted claims.

In addition to the routine legal proceedings noted above, the Company has been served with various lawsuits, filed against it and certain current and former officers and directors, by shareholders and participants in the Company’s 401(k) savings plan, alleging breaches of fiduciary duties with respect to the 401(k) plan. These complaints seek compensatory damages in unspecified amounts, fees and expenses related to such lawsuits and the granting of extraordinary equitable and/or injunctive relief. For each of these lawsuits, the date each complaint was filed, the name of the plaintiff and the federal court in which such lawsuit is pending are as follows:

	•	McDermott v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV170 (N.D. Ohio, filed January 24, 2006).

	•	Barnett v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV361 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 15, 2006).

	•	Farrell v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV307 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 8, 2006).

	•	Forbes v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV324 (N.D. Ohio, filed February 10, 2006).

	•	Gromek v. Diebold, Inc., et al., No. 5:06CV579 (N.D. Ohio, filed March 14, 2006).

The McDermott, Barnett, Farrell, Forbes and Gromek cases, which allege breaches of fiduciary duties under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 with respect to the 401(k) plan, have been consolidated into a single proceeding. In May 2009, the Company agreed to settle the 401(k) class action litigation for $4,500, to be paid out of the Company’s insurance policies. The settlement is subject to approval of the court.

On June 30, 2010, a shareholder filed a putative class action complaint in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio alleging violations of the federal securities laws against the Company, certain current and former officers, and the Company’s independent auditors (Louisiana Police Employees Retirement System v. KPMG et al., No. 10-CV-1461). The complaint seeks unspecified compensatory damages on behalf of a class of persons who purchased the Company’s stock between June 30, 2005 and January 15, 2008 and fees and expenses related to the lawsuit. The complaint generally relates to the matters set forth in the court documents filed by the SEC in June 2010 finalizing the settlement of civil charges stemming from the investigation of the Company conducted by the Division of Enforcement of the SEC (SEC Settlement).

On October 19, 2010, an alleged shareholder of the Company filed a shareholder derivative lawsuit in the Stark County, Ohio, Court of Common Pleas, alleging claims on behalf of the Company against certain current and former officers and directors of the Company for breach of fiduciary duty, unjust enrichment, and corporate waste (Levine v. Geswein et al., Case No. 2010-CV-3848). The complaint generally relates to the matters set forth in the court documents filed by the SEC on June 2010 in connection with the SEC Settlement, and asserts that the defendants are liable to the Company for alleged damages associated with the SEC investigation, settlement, and related litigation. It also asserts that alleged misstatements in the Company’s publicly issued financial statements caused the Company’s common stock to trade at artificially inflated prices between 2004 and 2006, and that defendants harmed the Company by causing it to repurchase its common stock in the open market at inflated prices during that period. The complaint seeks an award of money damages against the defendants and in favor of the Company in an unspecified amount, as well as unspecified equitable and injunctive relief and attorneys’ fees and expenses.

On August 28, 2009, a purported class action lawsuit was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of California alleging that a class of all California technicians employed by the Company who were scheduled to be on standby were: (a) not paid for all hours that they worked; (b) not paid overtime compensation at the correct rate of pay; (c) not properly paid for missed meal and rest breaks and (d) not given correct paycheck stubs (Francisco v. Diebold, Incorporated, Case No. CV 1889 WQH WMC). The complaint seeks additional overtime and other compensation under the California Labor Code, various civil penalties and attorneys’ fees and expenses, and a request for an injunction for future compliance with the California Labor Code provisions that were alleged to have been violated. The mediation is now scheduled.

On May 7, 2010, a purported collective action under the Fair Labor Standards Act was filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida alleging that field service employees of the Company nationwide were not paid for the time spent logging

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010

into the Company’s computer network in the morning, for travel to their first jobs and for meal periods that were supposedly automatically deducted from the employees’ pay but, allegedly, not taken (Nichols v. Diebold, Incorporated, Case No. 3:10cv150/RV/MD). The lawsuit seeks unpaid overtime, liquidated damages equal to the amount of unpaid overtime and attorneys’ fees. The plaintiff has voluntarily dismissed the lawsuit and the Company has agreed to mediate certain claims. The mediation is now scheduled.

The Company, including certain of its subsidiaries, filed a lawsuit on May 30, 2008 (Premier Election Solutions, Inc., et al. v. Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County, et al., Case No. 08-CV-05-7841, (Franklin Cty. Ct Common Pleas)) against Cuyahoga County, the Board of Elections of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, the Board of County Commissioners of Cuyahoga County, Ohio, (collectively, Cuyahoga County), and Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner (Secretary) regarding several Ohio contracts under which certain of the Company’s subsidiaries provided voting equipment and related services to the State of Ohio and a number of its counties. The lawsuit was precipitated by Cuyahoga County’s threats to sue the Company for unspecified damages. The complaint sought a declaration that the Company met its contractual obligations.

In response, Cuyahoga County and the Secretary filed several claims against the Company and its former subsidiaries alleging that the voting system was defective and seeking declaratory relief and unspecified damages under several theories of recovery. In addition, Cuyahoga County and the Secretary sought to pierce the Company’s “corporate veil” and hold Diebold, Incorporated directly liable for acts and omissions alleged to have been committed by its subsidiaries (even though Diebold, Incorporated is not a party to the contracts). In connection with the Company’s subsequent sale of those subsidiaries, the Company agreed to indemnify the former subsidiaries and their purchaser from any and all liabilities arising out of the lawsuit. The Secretary also added or sought to add to the case all of the Ohio counties using the former subsidiaries’ voting equipment. While many of the Ohio counties opposed the Secretary’s actions, the Butler County Board of Elections joined the Secretary’s claims.

In March 2010, the Company and Cuyahoga County agreed to settle their claims for $7,500, to be paid out of the Company’s insurance policies, and the court has dismissed that portion of the lawsuit

Since then, the Company has also reached settlement agreements with the Secretary and all of the Ohio counties using the former subsidiaries’ voting equipment, except Butler County. The settlements are for immaterial amounts, to be paid out of the Company’s insurance policies, and free or discounted products and services, to be provided by the Company’s former subsidiaries or third parties. On November 1, 2010, all of the claims in the lawsuit, except those of Butler County, were dismissed. For procedural purposes, simultaneously with the dismissal entry on November 1, 2010, the Company and its former subsidiaries filed a claim against Butler County seeking a declaration that it is not entitled to relief on its claims. Settlement discussions with Butler County are ongoing.

Management is unable to determine the financial statement impact, if any, of the putative federal securities class action, the purported wage and hour class and collective actions and the shareholder derivative lawsuit.

While conducting due diligence in connection with a potential acquisition in Russia, the Company identified certain transactions and payments by its subsidiary in Russia (primarily during 2005 to 2008) that potentially implicate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), particularly the books and records provisions of the FCPA. While the Company’s current assessment indicates that the transactions and payments in question do not materially impact or alter the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements, the Company continues to collect information and is conducting an internal review of its global FCPA compliance. At this time, the Company cannot predict the outcome or impact of this global review. In addition, the Company has voluntarily self-reported its findings to the SEC and the DOJ and is cooperating with these agencies in their review. The Company was recently informed that the SEC’s inquiry now has been converted to a formal, non-public investigation. The Company also received a subpoena for documents from the SEC and a voluntary request for documents from the DOJ in connection with the investigation. The Company cannot predict the length, scope or results of the investigations, or the impact, if any, on its results of operations.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010

ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS

(Dollars in thousands)

The following risk factors, in addition to the risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and June 30, 2010 and annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, are certain risk factors that could affect our business, financial condition, operating results and cash flows. These risk factors should be considered in connection with evaluating the forward-looking statements contained in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q because they could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement. These risk factors are not the only ones we face. If any of these events actually occur, our business, financial condition, operating results or cash flows could be negatively affected.

We caution the reader to keep these risk factors in mind and refrain from attributing undue certainty to any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this quarterly report.

We are currently subject to purported class and collective actions and shareholder derivative litigation, the unfavorable outcome of which might have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, operating results and cash flow.

A number of purported class and collective action lawsuits and a shareholder derivative lawsuit have been filed against us and certain current and former officers and directors alleging violations of federal and state laws, including with respect to federal securities laws and wage and hour matters. Although we believe that these lawsuits are without merit, and we intend to vigorously defend against these claims, we cannot determine with certainty the outcome or resolution of these claims or any future related claims, or the timing for their resolution. In addition to the expense and burden incurred in defending this litigation and any damages that we may suffer, management’s efforts and attention may be diverted from the ordinary business operations in order to address these claims. If the final resolution of this litigation is unfavorable, our financial condition, operating results and cash flows could be materially affected.

ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

Information concerning the Company’s share repurchases made during the third quarter of 2010:


							Maximum
					Total Number of		Number of Shares
	Total Number of				Shares Purchased as		that May Yet Be
	Shares		Average Price		Part of Publicly		Purchased Under
Period	Purchased (1)		Paid Per Share		Announced Plans (2)		the Plans (2)
July		86,857	$	28.16		84,000		2,195,051
August		21,000		27.51		21,000		2,174,051
September		21,493		29.52		21,000		2,153,051

Total		129,350		28.28		126,000


(1)		Includes 2,857 and 493 shares in July and September, respectively, surrendered or deemed surrendered to the Company in connection with the Company’s share-based compensation plans.

(2)		The Company purchased 126,000 common shares in the third quarter of 2010 pursuant to its share repurchase plan. The total number of shares repurchased as part of the publicly announced share repurchase plan was 9,846,949 as of September 30, 2010. The plan was approved by the Board of Directors in April 1997 and authorized the repurchase of up to two million shares. The plan was amended in June 2004 to authorize the repurchase of an additional two million shares, and was further amended in August and December 2005 to authorize the repurchase of an additional six million shares. In February 2007, the Board of Directors approved an increase in the Company’s share repurchase program by authorizing the repurchase of up to an additional two million of the Company’s outstanding common shares. The Company may purchase shares from time to time in open market purchases or privately negotiated transactions. The Company may make all or part of the purchases pursuant to accelerated share repurchases or Rule 10b5-1 plans. The plan has no expiration date.

ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4: [REMOVED AND RESERVED]

ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION

None.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010

ITEM 6: EXHIBITS


3.1(i)		Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(i) to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1994 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

3.1(ii)		Amended and Restated Code of Regulations — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1(ii) to Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2007 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

3.2		Certificate of Amendment by Shareholders to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1996 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

3.3		Certificate of Amendment to Amended Articles of Incorporation of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.1		Form of Amended and Restated Employment Agreement — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.5(i)		Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan I as amended and restated January 1, 2008 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(i) to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.5(ii)		Supplemental Employee Retirement Plan II as amended and restated July 1, 2002 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(ii) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.5(iii)		Pension Restoration Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(iii) to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.5(iv)		Pension Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(iv) to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.5(v)		401(k) Restoration Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(v) to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.5(vi)		401(k) Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5(vi) to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.7(i)		1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.7(ii)		Amendment No. 1 to the Amended and Restated 1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 (ii) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.7(iii)		Amendment No. 2 to the Amended and Restated 1985 Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 (ii) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.7(iv)		Deferred Compensation Plan No. 2 for Directors of Diebold, Incorporated — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7(iv) to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010


*10.8(i)		1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of February 7, 2001 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Form S-8 Registration Statement No. 333-60578

*10.8(ii)		Amendment No. 1 to the 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of February 7, 2001 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 (ii) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.8(iii)		Amendment No. 2 to the 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of February 7, 2001 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 (iii) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2004 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.8(iv)		Amendment No. 3 to the 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of February 7, 2001 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 (iv) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2004 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.8(v)		Amended and Restated 1991 Equity and Performance Incentive Plan as Amended and Restated as of April 13, 2009 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on April 29, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.9		Long-Term Executive Incentive Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1993 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.10		Deferred Incentive Compensation Plan No. 2 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.11		Annual Incentive Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.13(i)		Forms of Deferred Compensation Agreement and Amendment No. 1 to Deferred Compensation Agreement — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1996 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.13(ii)		Section 162(m) Deferred Compensation Agreement (as amended and restated January 29, 1998) — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 (ii) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.14		Deferral of Stock Option Gains Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1998 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

10.17		Credit Agreement, dated as of October 19, 2009, by and among the Company, the Subsidiary Borrowers (as defined therein) party thereto, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as administrative agent and a lender, and the other lenders party thereto — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on October 23, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

10.20(i)		Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of March 30, 2001 by and among DCC Funding LLC, Diebold Credit Corporation, Diebold, Incorporated, Receivables Capital Corporation and Bank of America, National Association and the financial institutions from time to time parties thereto — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20(i) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

10.20(ii)		Amendment No. 1 to the Transfer and Administration Agreement, dated as of May 2001, by and among DCC Funding LLC, Diebold Credit Corporation, Diebold, Incorporated, Receivables Capital Corporation and Bank of America, National Association and the financial institutions from time to time parties thereto — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 (ii) to Registrant’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March, 31, 2001 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.22		Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.23		Form of Restricted Share Agreement — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.24		Form of RSU Agreement — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.25		Form of Performance Share Agreement — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010


*10.26		Diebold, Incorporated Annual Cash Bonus Plan — incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to Registrant’s Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on March 16, 2010 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

10.27		Form of Note Purchase Agreement — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on March 8, 2006 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.28		Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between Diebold, Incorporated and Thomas W. Swidarski, as amended as of December 29, 2008 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.28 to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.29		Amended and Restated Employment [Change in Control] Agreement between Diebold, Incorporated and Thomas W. Swidarski, as amended as of December 29, 2008 — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 to Registrant’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

*10.30		Form of Deferred Shares Agreement — incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on September 21, 2009 (Commission File No. 1-4879)

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350
**101.INS		XBRL Instance Document
**101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
**101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
**101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
**101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document


*		Reflects management contract or other compensatory arrangement.
**		XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED AND SUBSIDIARIES
FORM 10-Q as of September 30, 2010

EXHIBIT INDEX


EXHIBIT NO.		DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION

31.1		Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

31.2		Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.1		Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

32.2		Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.

*101.INS		XBRL Instance Document

*101.SCH		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document

*101.CAL		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

*101.LAB		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document

*101.PRE		XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

* XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, is deemed not filed for purposes of section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.


PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION			3
ITEM 1: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS			3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS – September 30, 2010 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2009			3
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited) – Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009			4
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited) – Nine Months Ended September 30, 2010 and 2009			5
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)			6
ITEM 2: MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			26
ITEM 3: QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK			42
ITEM 4: CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES			43
PART II – OTHER INFORMATION			45
ITEM 1: LEGAL PROCEEDINGS			45
ITEM 1A: RISK FACTORS			47
ITEM 2: UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS			47
ITEM 3: DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES			47
ITEM 4: [REMOVED AND RESERVED]			47
ITEM 5: OTHER INFORMATION			47
ITEM 6: EXHIBITS			48
SIGNATURES			51
EXHIBIT INDEX			52
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT



	DIEBOLD, INCORPORATED
	(Registrant)

Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Thomas W. Swidarski
		Thomas W. Swidarski
		President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)

Date: November 5, 2010	By:	/s/ Bradley C. Richardson
		Bradley C. Richardson
		Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)