XML 22 R10.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.21.1
Earning Per Share
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2021
Earnings Per Share [Abstract]  
EARNINGS PER SHARE Earnings (Loss) Per ShareBasic earnings (loss) per share is based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share includes the dilutive effect of potential common shares outstanding. Under the two-class method of computing earnings (loss) per share, non-vested share-based payment awards that contain rights to receive non-forfeitable dividends are considered participating securities. The Company’s participating securities include restricted stock units (RSUs), director deferred shares and shares that were vested but deferred by employees. The Company calculated basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share under both the treasury stock method and the two-class method. For the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, there were no differences in the earnings (loss) per share amounts calculated using the two methods. Accordingly, the treasury stock method is disclosed below; however, because the Company is in a net loss position, dilutive shares of 1.3 and 3.1 for the three months ended March 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively, are excluded from the shares used in the computation of diluted earnings (loss) per share.
The following table represents amounts used in computing earnings (loss) per share and the effect on the weighted-average number of shares of dilutive potential common shares:
Three Months Ended
March 31,
20212020
Numerator
Income (loss) used in basic and diluted loss per share
Net loss$(8.1)$(93.4)
Net (income) loss attributable to noncontrolling interests— (0.6)
Net loss attributable to Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated$(8.1)$(92.8)
Denominator
Weighted-average number of common shares used in basic and diluted loss per share (1)
78.0 77.2 
Net loss attributable to Diebold Nixdorf, Incorporated
Basic and diluted loss per share$(0.10)$(1.20)
(1)1.6 and 2.8 shares are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the effects are anti-dilutive, irrespective of the net loss position.