DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

x QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months, and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Number of shares outstanding by each class of common stock,
as of October 31, 2003:

This document is also available on our web site at http://investor.delta.com/edgar.cfm.

Statements in this Form 10-Q (or otherwise made by us or on our behalf) that are not historical facts, including statements regarding our estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions, projections or strategies for the future, may be “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. All forward-looking statements involve a number of risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or our present expectations. Factors that could cause these differences include, but are not limited to:

the many effects on us and the airline industry from the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, including the following:

•

the change in our operations and higher costs resulting from new airline and airport security directives and related customer reactions;

•

the availability and cost of war and terrorism risk and other insurance for us; and

•

potential declines in the values of the aircraft in our fleet or facilities and related asset impairment charges;

the availability to us of financing on commercially reasonable terms, which may be influenced by, among other things, airline bankruptcies, the creditworthiness of the airline industry in general and us in particular, and actions by credit rating agencies;

military action in Iraq and continued geopolitical uncertainty, including additional terrorist activity;

general economic conditions, both in the United States and in our markets outside the United States;

the results of the profit improvement initiatives previously announced by us;

the willingness of customers to travel generally, and with us specifically, which could be affected by disease outbreaks, such as Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome, and our and the industry’s safety record;

competitive factors in our industry, such as airline bankruptcies, the airline pricing environment, the growth of low cost carriers, the ability of other airlines to reduce their costs through bankruptcy or otherwise, international alliances, codesharing programs, capacity decisions by competitors and mergers and acquisitions;

outcomes of negotiations on collective bargaining agreements, including Delta’s current discussions with the Air Line Pilots Association to reduce pilot employment costs, and other labor issues;

10.

our future funding obligations under our defined benefit pension plans, which are based on various factors, including actual market performance of our pension plan assets, future 30-year U.S. Treasury bond yields and regulatory requirements;

11.

disruptions to operations due to adverse weather conditions and air traffic control-related constraints;

12.

actions by the United States or foreign governments, including the Federal Aviation Administration and other regulatory agencies; and

Additional information concerning risks and uncertainties that could cause differences between actual results and forward-looking statements is contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 and in Pre-Effective Amendment No.1 to our Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 14, 2003. Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on our forward-looking statements, which represent our views as of November 14, 2003, and which we have no current intention to update.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Millions, Except Share Data)


			September 30,			December 31,
ASSETS			2003			2002

			(Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents		$	2,727		$	1,969
	Restricted cash			205			134
	Accounts receivable, net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $53 at September 30, 2003 and $33 at December 31, 2002			796			292
	Income tax receivable			8			319
	Expendable parts and supplies inventories, net of an allowance for obsolescence of $181 at September 30, 2003 and $183 at December 31, 2002			197			164
	Deferred income taxes			691			668
	Prepaid expenses and other			338			356

		Total current assets		4,962			3,902

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
	Flight equipment			20,867			20,295
	Accumulated depreciation			(6,272	)		(6,109	)

		Flight equipment, net		14,595			14,186

	Flight and ground equipment under capital leases			478			439
	Accumulated amortization			(361	)		(297	)

		Flight and ground equipment under capital leases, net		117			142

	Ground property and equipment			4,423			4,270
	Accumulated depreciation			(2,379	)		(2,206	)

		Ground property and equipment, net		2,044			2,064

	Advance payments for equipment			89			132

		Total property and equipment, net		16,845			16,524

OTHER ASSETS:
	Investments in associated companies			—			174
	Goodwill			2,092			2,092
	Operating rights and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $177 at September 30, 2003 and $172 at December 31, 2002			97			102
	Restricted investments for Boston airport terminal project			336			417
	Other noncurrent assets			1,429			1,509

		Total other assets		3,954			4,294

Total assets			$	25,761		$	24,720

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


					September 30,			December 31,
LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY					2003			2002

					(Unaudited)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current maturities of long-term debt				$	1,005		$	666
	Current obligations under capital leases					24			27
	Accounts payable, deferred credits and other accrued liabilities					1,735			1,921
	Air traffic liability					1,539			1,270
	Taxes payable					873			862
	Accrued salaries and related benefits					1,214			1,365
	Accrued rent					215			344

		Total current liabilities				6,605			6,455

NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Long-term debt					10,939			9,576
	Long-term debt issued by Massachusetts Port Authority					498			498
	Capital leases					77			100
	Postretirement benefits					2,274			2,282
	Accrued rent					726			739
	Pension and related benefits					3,151			3,242
	Other					179			93

			Total noncurrent liabilities			17,844			16,530

DEFERRED CREDITS:
	Deferred gains on sale and leaseback transactions					440			478
	Deferred revenue and other credits					104			100

		Total deferred credits				544			578

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 3, 5 and 6)
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN PREFERRED STOCK:
	Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value, $72.00 stated and liquidation value; 5,887,361 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2003, and 6,065,489 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2002					424			437
	Unearned compensation under employee stock ownership plan					(153	)		(173	)

			Total Employee Stock Ownership Plan Preferred Stock			271			264

SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY:
	Common stock, $1.50 par value; 450,000,000 shares authorized; 180,911,284 shares issued at September 30, 2003 and 180,903,373 shares issued at December 31, 2002					271			271
	Additional paid-in capital					3,258			3,263
	Retained earnings					1,175			1,639
	Accumulated other comprehensive loss					(1,494	)		(1,562	)
	Treasury stock at cost, 57,477,097 shares at September 30, 2003 and 57,544,168 shares at December 31, 2002					(2,713	)		(2,718	)

				Total shareowners’ equity		497			893

Total liabilities and shareowners’ equity					$	25,761		$	24,720

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(In Millions, Except Share Data)


			Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
			September 30,						September 30,

			2003			2002			2003			2002

OPERATING REVENUES:
	Passenger		$	3,201		$	3,165		$	9,181		$	9,260
	Cargo			113			112			340			332
	Other, net			129			143			384			405

		Total operating revenues		3,443			3,420			9,905			9,997

OPERATING EXPENSES:
	Salaries and related costs			1,564			1,555			4,790			4,619
	Aircraft fuel			482			468			1,428			1,208
	Depreciation and amortization			298			289			895			861
	Contracted services			208			256			659			760
	Landing fees and other rents			214			213			644			627
	Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs			162			182			465			548
	Aircraft rent			182			175			544			532
	Other selling expenses			128			141			367			426
	Passenger commissions			52			72			157			268
	Passenger service			86			95			242			287
	Asset writedowns, restructuring and related items, net			(7	)		225			36			288
	Appropriations Act reimbursements			—			—			(398	)		—
	Stabilization Act compensation			—			(34	)		—			(34	)
	Other			155			168			496			554

		Total operating expenses		3,524			3,805			10,325			10,944

OPERATING LOSS				(81	)		(385	)		(420	)		(947	)

OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
	Interest expense			(186	)		(165	)		(541	)		(481	)
	Interest income			9			9			26			29
	Gain (loss) from sale of investments			1			—			284			(3	)
	Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt			15			—			—			—
	Fair value adjustments of SFAS 133 derivatives			(1	)		10			(16	)		(33	)
	Miscellaneous income (expense), net			(11	)		4			(10	)		19

		Total other income (expense)		(173	)		(142	)		(257	)		(469	)

LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES				(254	)		(527	)		(677	)		(1,416	)
INCOME TAX BENEFIT				90			201			231			507

NET LOSS				(164	)		(326	)		(446	)		(909	)
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS				(4	)		(4	)		(12	)		(11	)

NET LOSS AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREOWNERS			$	(168	)	$	(330	)	$	(458	)	$	(920	)

BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE			$	(1.36	)	$	(2.67	)	$	(3.71	)	$	(7.46	)

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES USED IN BASIC AND DILUTED PER SHARE COMPUTATION				123,389,862			123,285,610			123,371,138			123,257,925

DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE			$	—		$	0.025		$	0.050		$	0.075

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In Millions)


			Nine Months Ended
			September 30,

			2003			2002

CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss		$	(446	)	$	(909	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities, net			503			556
	Changes in certain assets and liabilities, net			314			431

		Net cash provided by operating activities		371			78

CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions:
		Flight equipment, including advance payments		(318	)		(855	)
		Ground property and equipment		(245	)		(243	)
	Decrease in restricted investments related to the Boston airport terminal project			81			37
	Proceeds from sale of investments			275			24
	Proceeds from sale of flight equipment			12			46
	Other, net			(1	)		(6	)

		Net cash used in investing activities		(196	)		(997	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations			(532	)		(418	)
	Issuance of long-term obligations			1,682			1,598
	Payments on notes payable and short term obligations, net			(151	)		(780	)
	Cash dividends on common and preferred stock			(19	)		(22	)
	Make whole payments on extinguishment of ESOP Notes			(15	)		—
	Redemption of preferred stock			(13	)		(13	)
	Payment on termination of accounts receivable securitization			(250	)		—
	Other, net			(119	)		1

		Net cash provided by financing activities		583			366

NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:				758			(553	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period				1,969			2,210

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			$	2,727		$	1,657

SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
	Interest (net of amounts capitalized)		$	515		$	382
	Income taxes, net		$	(397	)	$	(515	)

NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:
Aircraft delivered under seller financing arrangements			$	680		$	393

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,

	2003			2002			2003			2002

Statistical Summary:
Revenue Passenger Miles (millions)		26,536			27,364			73,494			76,913
Available Seat Miles (millions)		34,509			36,840			99,747			106,439
Passenger Mile Yield		12.06	¢		11.57	¢		12.49	¢		12.04	¢
Operating Revenue Per Available Seat Mile		9.98	¢		9.28	¢		9.93	¢		9.39	¢
Passenger Revenue Per Available Seat Mile		9.28	¢		8.59	¢		9.20	¢		8.70	¢
Operating Cost Per Available Seat Mile		10.21	¢		10.33	¢		10.35	¢		10.28	¢
Passenger Load Factor		76.89	%		74.28	%		73.68	%		72.26	%
Breakeven Passenger Load Factor		78.83	%		83.29	%		77.05	%		79.65	%
Passengers Enplaned (thousands)		27,059			27,713			77,938			79,758
Revenue Ton Miles (millions)		2,996			3,098			8,374			8,789
Cargo Ton Miles (millions)		342			362			1,024			1,098
Cargo Ton Mile Yield		32.99	¢		31.01	¢		33.17	¢		30.28	¢
Fuel Gallons Consumed (millions)		609			656			1,768			1,889
Average Price Per Fuel Gallon, net of hedging gains		79.15	¢		71.33	¢		80.80	¢		63.93	¢
Number of Aircraft in Fleet, End of Period		829			822			829			822
Full-Time Equivalent Employees, End of Period		70,100			76,000			70,100			76,000

Our total aircraft fleet, orders, options and rolling options at September 30, 2003 are summarized in the following table. Options have scheduled delivery slots. Rolling options replace options and are assigned delivery slots as options expire or are exercised.


	Current Fleet

Aircraft Type	Owned		Leased		Total		Orders			Options		Rolling Options

B-737-200		4		48		52		—			—		—
B-737-300		—		26		26		—			—		—
B-737-800		71		—		71		61	⁽¹⁾		60		227
B-757-200		77		44		121		—			20		38
B-767-200		15		—		15		—			—		—
B-767-300		4		24		28		—			—		—
B-767-300ER		51		8		59		—			10		8
B-767-400		21		—		21		—			24		—
B-777-200		8		—		8		5			20		10
MD-11		8		6		14		—			—		—
MD-88		63		57		120		—			—		—
MD-90		16		—		16		—			—		—
ATR-72		4		15		19		—			—		—
CRJ-100/200		104		122		226		—			178		—
CRJ-700		33		—		33		25			157		—

Total		479		350		829		91			469		283

⁽¹⁾ In October 2003, we entered into a definitive agreement with a third party to sell 11 B-737-800 aircraft immediately after those aircraft are delivered to us by the manufacturer in 2005. These 11 B-737-800 aircraft are included in the above table because we continue to have a contractual obligation to purchase these aircraft from the manufacturer. For additional information about our sale agreement, see Note 12 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

The table above reflects the following changes which occurred during the September 2003 quarter:

The table above includes the following 24 aircraft, which have been temporarily grounded: nine B-737-200, three B-767-200, one B-767-300ER and 11 MD-11 aircraft.

The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, this Form 10-Q does not include all the information required by GAAP for complete financial statements. As a result, this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes in our 2002 Annual Report to Shareowners (Annual Report).

Management believes that the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, asset writedowns, and restructuring and related items, considered necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. We have reclassified certain prior period amounts in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements to be consistent with our current period presentation. The effect of these reclassifications is not material.

Due to seasonal variations in the demand for air travel and other factors, operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year.

We account for our stock-based compensation plans under the intrinsic value method in accordance with Accounting Principles Bulletin (APB) Opinion 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees,” and related interpretations. For additional information related to our stock-based compensation plans, see Note 12 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 55-57) in our Annual Report. No stock option compensation expense is recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations because all stock options granted had an exercise price equal to the fair value of the underlying common stock on the grant date.

In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation” (SFAS 123), the tables below have been prepared assuming the approximately 32 million stock options canceled on June 25, 2003 under our stock option exchange program (Exchange Program) were immediately reissued as approximately 12 million new stock options. Accordingly, these disclosures include estimates about (1) the number of stock options that will be reissued; (2) the grant price on the date of reissue; (3) the risk-free interest rate; (4) the expected life of the new stock options; and (5) the expected volatility of our common stock. When these stock options are actually reissued (which we expect to occur on December 26, 2003), the estimates will be

adjusted based on actual data at that time and may differ materially from the estimates shown below. For additional information about our Exchange Program, see Note 1 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 9-11) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

The estimated fair values of stock options granted during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002 were derived using the Black-Scholes model. The following table includes the assumptions used in estimating fair values and the resulting weighted average fair value of a stock option granted in the periods presented:


	Stock Options Granted During the

	Three Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	September 30,					September 30,

Assumption	2003		2002			2003			2002

Risk-free interest rate		—		3.4	%		2.2	%		4.7	%
Average expected life of stock options (in years)		—		6.5			5.2			6.5
Expected volatility of common stock		—		43.7	%		54.3	%		32.9	%
Expected annual dividends on common stock		—	$	0.10		$	—		$	0.10
Weighted average fair value of a stock option granted		—	$	8		$	7		$	13

The following table shows what our net loss and loss per share would have been for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, had we accounted for our stock-based compensation plans under the fair value method of SFAS 123, as amended by SFAS No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation - - Transition and Disclosure,” using the assumptions in the table above:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,

(in millions, except per share data)	2003			2002			2003			2002

Net loss:
As reported	$	(164	)	$	(326	)	$	(446	)	$	(909	)
Stock option compensation expense determined under the fair value based method, net of tax		(8	)		(14	)		(24	)		(39	)

As adjusted for the fair value method under SFAS 123	$	(172	)	$	(340	)	$	(470	)	$	(948	)

Basic and diluted loss per share:
As reported	$	(1.36	)	$	(2.67	)	$	(3.71	)	$	(7.46	)
As adjusted for the fair value method under SFAS 123	$	(1.43	)	$	(2.79	)	$	(3.91	)	$	(7.78	)

On February 1, 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued FASB Interpretation No. (FIN) 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities (FIN 46),” which addresses how to identify variable interest entities and the criteria that require a company to consolidate such entities in its financial statements. FIN 46, as amended, was effective on February 1, 2003 for new transactions and is effective for reporting periods ending after December 15, 2003 for transactions entered into prior to February 1, 2003. We have not entered into any new transactions subject to FIN

We have completed our preliminary evaluation of our transactions entered into prior to February 1, 2003 related to (1) contract carriers; (2) certain aircraft operating leases; (3) special facilities revenue bonds; and (4) fuel consortiums. We have determined that we neither hold a significant variable interest in, nor are the primary beneficiary of, any of these arrangements. While we will continue to evaluate these arrangements as new guidance related to this interpretation becomes available, we do not expect the final adoption of FIN 46 during the December 2003 quarter to materially impact our Consolidated Financial Statements.

In accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133), we record all derivative instruments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair market value and recognize certain changes in these fair market values in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. SFAS 133 applies to the accounting for our fuel hedging program and our holdings of equity warrants and other similar rights in certain companies. The impact of SFAS 133 on our Consolidated Statements of Operations is summarized as follows:


				Income (Expense)

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,

(in millions)	2003			2002			2003			2002

Change in time value of fuel hedge contracts	$	(10	)	$	(1	)	$	(52	)	$	(27	)
Ineffective portion of fuel hedge contracts		3			19			22			24
Fair value adjustment of equity rights		6			(8	)		14			(30	)

Fair value adjustments of SFAS 133 derivatives, pretax	$	(1	)	$	10		$	(16	)	$	(33	)

Total, net of tax	$	(1	)	$	6		$	(11	)	$	(21	)

At September 30, 2003, our fuel hedge contracts had an estimated short-term fair market value of $62 million, which was recorded in prepaid expenses and other on our Consolidated Balance Sheets, and an estimated long-term fair market value of $8 million, which was recorded in other noncurrent assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. Unrealized gains of $20 million, net of tax, were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2003. For additional information about SFAS 133 and our fuel hedging program, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 40-41) in our Annual Report.

At September 30, 2003, the total fair market value of our equity warrants and other similar rights was $35 million. The changes in fair market value of these rights are recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as fair value adjustments of SFAS 133 derivatives. For additional information about these equity interests, see Notes 2 and 22 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 37-39 and pages 64-65, respectively) in our Annual Report.

The following table presents information about our intangible assets, other than goodwill, at September 30, 2003 and December 31, 2002:

The following table summarizes the scheduled maturities of our debt, including current maturities, at September 30, 2003:

In September 2003, we completed a debt exchange offer relating to $300 million principal amount of our 6.65% Series C Medium-Term Notes due 2004 (2004 Notes), and $500 million principal amount of our 7.70% Senior Notes due 2005 (2005 Notes). Under the exchange offer, qualified institutional buyers could elect to exchange (1) for each $1,000 principal amount of 2004 Notes tendered, $650 cash and $409.50 principal amount of new 10% Senior Notes due August 15, 2008

(2008 Notes), and (2) for each $1,000 principal amount of 2005 Notes tendered, $1,120 principal amount of new 2008 Notes.

As a result of the exchange offer, $64 million principal amount of the 2004 Notes and $198 million principal amount of the 2005 Notes were tendered. We paid a total of $47 million in cash (including $5 million in accrued interest) and issued an aggregate of $248 million principal amount of 2008 Notes. This transaction qualified as a debt extinguishment and, accordingly, we recorded the issuance of the 2008 Notes at a fair value of $211 million, which reflects a $37 million original issue discount. This discount will be amortized to interest expense through August 15, 2008. Of the $47 million payment, we recorded $42 million as a payment on long-term debt and capital lease obligations and $5 million as a change in certain assets and liabilities, net in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. As a result of this transaction, we also recorded a $15 million gain ($9 million net of tax) on extinguishment of debt in other income (expense) on our Consolidated Statements of Operations during the September 2003 quarter.

On January 31, 2002, we entered into a facility to finance, on a secured basis at the time of acquisition, certain future deliveries of regional jet aircraft. At September 30, 2003, total borrowings outstanding under this facility, as amended, were $414 million. Borrowings under this facility (1) are due between 366 days and 18 months after the date of borrowing (subject to earlier repayment if certain longer-term financing is obtained for these aircraft) and (2) bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin.

In July 2003, we entered into financing arrangements under which we borrowed a total of $286 million. These borrowings are due in installments through May 2021; are secured by six CRJ-700 and 12 CRJ-200 aircraft; and bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin. A portion of these borrowings was used to refinance $215 million of outstanding interim financing for six CRJ-700 and seven CRJ-200 aircraft.

For additional information about our debt, see Note 6 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 43-46) in our Annual Report and Note 5 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 14-15) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

Future expenditures for aircraft and engines on order as of September 30, 2003 are estimated to be $4.1 billion. The following table shows the timing of these commitments, which include our payments to purchase from the manufacturer 11 B-737-800 aircraft that we have entered into a definitive agreement to sell to a third party immediately following delivery of these aircraft to us in 2005 (for additional information about the sale agreement, see Note 12 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q):

We have contract carrier agreements with three regional air carriers, Atlantic Coast Airlines, Inc. (ACA), SkyWest Airlines, Inc. (SkyWest) and Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. (Chautauqua), a regional air carrier which is a subsidiary of Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. The total number of aircraft operated under these agreements was 137 and 92 at September 30, 2003 and September 30, 2002, respectively.

Under our ASM-buy arrangements, we schedule certain aircraft that are operated by the above airlines using our flight code, sell the seats on those flights and retain the related revenues. We pay the above airlines a contractually defined amount based on their cost of operating those flights and other factors which are intended to approximate market rates for these services. The following table shows the total number of available seat miles (ASMs) operated for us by ACA, SkyWest and Chautauqua, and our expenses related to the ASM-buy arrangements, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002:

Effective August 1, 2003, we changed certain routes SkyWest operates for us from an ASM-buy arrangement to a prorate flying arrangement pursuant to a new agreement entered into with SkyWest. Under the new agreement, SkyWest controls scheduling, ticketing, pricing, and seat

inventories for these routes and we receive a prorated portion of each passenger fare. This change has not had a material impact on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

For additional information about our agreements with ACA, SkyWest and Chautauqua, see Notes 9 and 22 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 48-50 and pages 64-65, respectively) in our Annual Report.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we issued 7,911 shares of common stock and distributed a net total of 67,071 shares from treasury under our 2000 Performance Compensation Plan and the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Plan. For additional information about our stock compensation plans, see Note 12 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 55-57) in our Annual Report.

Comprehensive income (loss) includes (1) reported net income (loss); (2) additional minimum pension liability adjustments; and (3) unrealized gains and losses on marketable equity securities and fuel derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting. The following table shows our comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002:

The following table shows the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss at September 30, 2003 and the activity for the nine months then ended:


		Additional
		Minimum			Fuel			Marketable
		Pension			Derivative			Equity
(in millions)		Liability			Instruments			Securities			Total

Balance at December 31, 2002		$	(1,586	)	$	29		$	(5	)	$	(1,562	)

	Minimum liability adjustment		116			—			—			116
	Unrealized gain		—			116			6			122
	Realized gain		—			(131	)		(5	)		(136	)
	Impairment		—			—			8			8
	Tax effect		(44	)		6			(4	)		(42	)

	Net of tax		72			(9	)		5			68

Balance at September 30, 2003		$	(1,514	)	$	20		$	—		$	(1,494	)

We anticipate that gains of $19 million, net of tax, will be realized over the 12 months ending September 30, 2004 and $1 million thereafter as fuel hedge contracts settle and the related aircraft fuel purchases being hedged are consumed and recognized in expense. For additional information about our fuel hedge contracts, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q and Note 3 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 12-13) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003. For information about our additional minimum pension liability, see Note 12 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 51-55) in our Annual Report and Note 9 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (page 16) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.

We are managed as a single business unit that provides air transportation for passengers and cargo. For additional information about how we manage our business, see Note 15 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 58-59) in our Annual Report. Our operating revenues by geographic region are summarized in the following table:

The following table shows our restructuring and other reserve balances as of September 30, 2003 and the activity for the nine months then ended for restructuring costs recorded in prior years related to (1) facility closures and other costs and (2) severance and related costs:

The facilities and other reserve represents costs related primarily to (1) lease payments to be paid on closed facilities and (2) contract termination fees. The reserve for the 2002 workforce reduction

programs primarily represents (1) employee severance costs and (2) medical benefits for employees who received severance or are participating in certain leave of absence programs.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2003, we recorded an adjustment of $9 million, including $7 million in the September 2003 quarter, to the facilities and other reserves balance based on revised estimates of remaining costs due primarily to changes in certain facility lease terms. For additional information about our charges for restructuring and related items recorded in prior years, see Notes 16 and 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 59-62) in our Annual Report, and Note 11 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (page 18) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

We calculate basic earnings (loss) per share by dividing the income (loss) available to common shareowners by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share includes the dilutive effects of stock options and convertible securities. To the extent stock options and convertible securities are anti-dilutive, they are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share. The following table shows our computation of basic and diluted loss per share:


	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,

(in millions, except per share data)	2003			2002			2003			2002

BASIC AND DILUTED:
Net loss	$	(164	)	$	(326	)	$	(446	)	$	(909	)
Dividends on allocated Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock		(4	)		(4	)		(12	)		(11	)

Net loss available to common shareowners	$	(168	)	$	(330	)	$	(458	)	$	(920	)

Weighted average shares outstanding		123.4			123.3			123.4			123.3

Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(1.36	)	$	(2.67	)	$	(3.71	)	$	(7.46	)

For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, we excluded from the diluted loss per share computation (1) 34 million and 45 million stock options, respectively, because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average price of our common stock; (2) seven million additional shares because their effect on our loss per share was anti-dilutive; and (3) the shares issuable upon conversion of our 8% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023 because the contingent conditions for conversion have not been met.

For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, we excluded from the diluted loss per share computation (1) 54 million stock options because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average price of common stock, and (2) seven million additional shares because their effect on our loss per share was anti-dilutive.

We have agreed to pay the third party for a designated period with respect to each of the 11 B-737-800 aircraft, an amount equal to the excess, if any, of a specified rate over the rate at which the third party leases the aircraft to another party. The maximum undiscounted amount we could be required to pay for all 11 aircraft totals approximately $70 million. While we cannot predict with certainty whether we will be required to make a payment under this provision, we believe that the possibility of this event is not likely given the current and estimated future marketability of these aircraft.

We have also granted the third party an option to purchase up to 10 additional B-737-800 aircraft scheduled for delivery to us in 2006.

We sponsor defined benefit pension plans for eligible employees and retirees. For additional information about these pension plans, see Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 51-55) in our Annual Report.

Additional Minimum Pension Liability Adjustment. At December 31, 2003, we will record an additional minimum pension liability adjustment related to our defined benefit pension plans which will reduce shareowners’ equity. This non-cash adjustment, estimated to be approximately $700 million, net of tax, will affect our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2003, but will not impact our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the December 2003 quarter. The actual adjustment may differ materially from this estimate because it will be based on the extent to which our accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) under our defined benefit pension plans on September 30, 2003 exceeded the fair value of the plan assets on that date. We have not yet determined the ABO of these plans as of that date.

We will record this adjustment in accordance with SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” (SFAS 87). SFAS 87 requires that an additional minimum pension liability be recognized at year end in an amount at least equal to the amount by which the ABO exceeds the fair value of the plan assets at the measurement date. This amount is charged to an intangible asset to the extent of any unrecognized prior service costs and unrecognized transition obligation. Any amount in excess is charged, net of tax, to accumulated other comprehensive loss.

Settlement Charge. During the December 2003 quarter, we will record a non-cash charge related to our pilots’ defined benefit pension plan resulting from a significant increase in pilot retirements; this non-cash charge relates to approximately 620 pilot retirements during the year ended September 30, 2003. This non-cash charge is estimated to be approximately $140 million, net of tax, and will be recorded in our operating expenses on our Consolidated Statement of Operations during the

December 2003 quarter. The actual settlement charge may differ materially from the estimated charge because the actual charge will be based on, among other things, the projected benefit obligation (PBO) under the pilots’ defined benefit pension plan on September 30, 2003. We have not yet determined the PBO under that plan as of that date.

We will record this charge in accordance with SFAS No. 88, “Employers’ Accounting for Settlements and Curtailments of Defined Benefit Pension Plans and for Termination Benefits” (SFAS 88). SFAS 88 requires settlement accounting if the cost of all settlements, including lump sum retirement benefits paid, in a year exceeds the total of the service and interest cost components of pension expense for the same period. In accordance with SFAS 88, we must record the unrecognized net actuarial plan loss incurred to date in proportion to the amount of the obligation that has been settled. The unrecognized net actuarial plan loss largely equates to the difference between the PBO and the fair value of plan assets.

Delaware law generally prohibits a company from paying dividends on its stock, or redeeming or purchasing its stock for cash or other property, unless the company has sufficient surplus. Surplus is generally defined as the excess of a company’s net assets over the aggregate par value of its issued stock. Due to the effect of the additional minimum pension liability adjustment and settlement charge discussed above, we believe we will have a negative surplus at December 31, 2003. Accordingly, effective December 2003, our Board of Directors took the following actions to comply with Delaware law:

•

Suspended indefinitely the payment of dividends on our ESOP Preferred Stock. Unpaid dividends will accrue without interest until paid at a rate of $4.32 per share per year.

•

Changed the form of payment we will use to redeem shares of the ESOP Preferred Stock when redemptions are required under our Delta Family-Care Savings Plan. For the indefinite future, we will pay the redemption price of $72 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends in shares of our common stock rather than in cash.

For additional information about our ESOP Preferred Stock, see Notes 11 and 12 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 51-57) in our Annual Report.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Since September 11, 2001, Delta and the airline industry have experienced the worst financial crisis in aviation history. Substantial revenue declines, coupled with significant cost pressures, have resulted in industry-wide liquidity issues and the restructuring of certain major hub and spoke carriers due to bankruptcy or near-bankruptcy. These events have fundamentally altered our industry.

Additionally, during 2003, the industry’s financial results have been negatively impacted by the military action in Iraq and the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome outbreak. Although there has been some improvement in passenger demand since the end of major military combat in Iraq in May 2003, the demand and revenue environment remains weak.

Our revenues for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, continued to be adversely impacted by revenue challenges faced during 2002, including (1) a sharp decline in high-yield business travel after the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks; (2) industry capacity exceeding passenger demand, which resulted in heavy fare discounting to stimulate demand; and (3) a reduction in traffic due to the real and perceived “hassle factor” resulting from increased airport security measures.

In addition to the revenue challenges discussed above, our revenues have been adversely impacted by the growth of the low cost carriers, the weakness of the U.S. and world economies, and increased price-sensitivity in customers’ purchasing behavior. This change in purchasing behavior has facilitated the growth of low cost carriers, which are continuing to expand in our key markets.

Additionally, the depressed demand and revenue environment that existed in 2002 further deteriorated during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, primarily in the March and June 2003 quarters, due to the threatened and actual military action in Iraq, which reduced the demand for air travel. International traffic, particularly in our Atlantic region, experienced the greatest impact related to these events, declining 15% for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 as compared to the same period a year ago. Year-over-year increases in military charter revenues partially offset the negative impact of these events. In April 2003, we implemented a 12% reduction in planned mainline capacity in response to the decline in demand due to the military action in Iraq; by the end of 2003, we will have restored most of these capacity reductions. During the September 2003 quarter, we realized somewhat lower revenues, in part due to the capacity reductions associated with the military action in Iraq.

After September 11, 2001, the U.S. government imposed a passenger security fee which airlines are required to collect from customers and then remit to the government. Due to the weak demand and revenue environment, this action has negatively impacted our revenues because we have not been able to increase our fares to pass these fees on to our customers. Under the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act (Appropriations Act), this fee was suspended for tickets sold

between June 1, 2003 through September 30, 2003, which positively impacted our revenues during the September 2003 quarter. We believe that the re-imposition of the passenger security fee on October 1, 2003 will adversely affect our revenues in future periods.

Our year-over-year cost pressures during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003 included increases in (1) pension expense, primarily due to increased obligations resulting from declining interest rates, a decrease in the fair value of our pension plan assets and annual scheduled pilot pay increases; (2) fuel expense, mainly due to the rise in fuel prices in the period leading up to the military action in Iraq; and (3) interest expense, largely due to higher levels of debt outstanding. These costs increased by a total of approximately $110 million and $500 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, as compared to the same periods a year ago.

As previously reported, we estimate total annual increases for 2003 compared to 2002 related to pension and interest expense will be approximately $375 million to $400 million. Based on our current assumptions, we estimate that our fuel expenses will not be significantly different for the three months ending December 31, 2003, than they were in the corresponding period a year ago.

Salaries and related costs represent 44% and 46% of our total operating expenses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively. We have taken steps, such as workforce reductions and changes in our non-pilot employee benefits, to reduce employee-related costs. However, our pilot cost structure is significantly higher than our peers. Our current Delta pilot contract does not become amendable until May 1, 2005. In October 2003, we presented a revised proposal to the Air Line Pilots Association (ALPA), which represents Delta’s pilots, to move toward a competitive pilot cost structure. We cannot predict the outcome of these discussions.

It is essential for us to reduce our costs to compete in the current business environment due to the (1) weak demand and revenue environment; (2) reduced cost structures achieved by other major hub and spoke air carriers resulting from bankruptcy and near-bankruptcy restructurings; and (3) the continuing growth of low cost carriers. Accordingly, during 2003, we continued to develop and implement initiatives to achieve our goal of reducing non-fuel unit costs by 15% by the end of 2005, as compared to 2002.

Our profit improvement initiatives fall into the following three categories, which focus on cost savings and revenue enhancements:

•

Travel Process and Customer Service Initiatives. These initiatives are intended to redesign the travel process to better serve our customers while increasing efficiency. Travel process and customer service initiatives include, among other things, enhancing airport self-service (such as the installation of kiosks and Delta direct dial phones, and improvements in airport lobby design) and increasing productivity in ground handling processes.

•

Operational and Product Initiatives. These initiatives are intended to enhance operational efficiency and redefine our product portfolio to meet changing market demand. Operational and product initiatives include our marketing alliance with Continental Airlines and Northwest Airlines

•

Workforce Initiatives. These initiatives are intended to increase productivity and reduce employment costs while strengthening a performance-based culture.

While operating expenses increased $413 million in the September 2003 quarter as compared to the June 2003 quarter, this increase primarily reflects $398 million of reimbursements we received from the U.S. government under the Appropriations Act in the June 2003 quarter; these reimbursements were recorded as an offset to operating expenses in the June 2003 quarter. Therefore, our remaining operating expenses were not materially different for the September 2003 quarter as compared to the June 2003 quarter. This illustrates the increased productivity realized from our profit improvement initiatives because capacity was 8% higher in the September 2003 quarter than the June 2003 quarter. While this result reflects good progress in keeping with our plans, we must continue to reduce our costs to compete in this current business environment.

In September 2003, we announced the restructuring of operations at our Salt Lake City hub, which will take effect in January 2004. This restructuring, which is one of our operational and product initiatives, will increase departures, while decreasing hub capacity by over 13% year-over-year, primarily through the replacement of mainline aircraft with the increased use of regional jet aircraft.

At September 30, 2003, our cash and cash equivalents totaled $2.7 billion compared to $2.0 billion at December 31, 2002. We do not have any existing undrawn lines of credit other than certain financing commitments from a third party related to the acquisition of regional jet aircraft. For further information about our liquidity, see the Financial Condition and Liquidity section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.

We expect to report a net loss of approximately $365 million to $415 million for the December 2003 quarter. This includes (1) an estimated $140 million settlement charge, net of tax, related to the pilots’ defined benefit pension plan and (2) a $26 million charge, net of tax, associated with the planned sale of 11 B-737-800 aircraft. For additional information about these charges, see the Financial Condition and Liquidity section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.

Our unaudited consolidated net loss was $164 million for the September 2003 quarter ($1.36 diluted loss per share), compared to a net loss of $326 million ($2.67 diluted loss per share) in the September 2002 quarter.

Operating revenues totaled $3.4 billion in the September 2003 quarter, a 1% increase compared

to the depressed level recorded in the September 2002 quarter. Passenger revenues increased 1% to $3.2 billion. This 1% increase in passenger revenues, in conjunction with 6% lower capacity, resulted in an 8% rise in passenger revenue per available seat mile. Revenue passenger miles decreased 3% on a capacity decline of 6%, while passenger mile yield increased 4%. For additional information about factors impacting our passenger revenues for the September 2003 quarter, see the Business Environment section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.

North American Passenger Revenues - North American passenger revenues increased 2% to $2.5 billion for the September 2003 quarter. Revenue passenger miles decreased 1% on a capacity decrease of 5%, while passenger mile yield rose 3%. Load factors increased by 3.0 points, reflecting the 1% decline in revenue passenger miles and 5% decrease in capacity.

International Passenger Revenues - International passenger revenues decreased 4% to $641 million during the September 2003 quarter. Revenue passenger miles decreased 11% on a capacity decline of 13%, while passenger mile yield increased 8%. The 13% decline in capacity was the primary reason for the 4% decrease in international passenger revenues. The increase in passenger mile yield primarily relates to the reduction of capacity in certain markets and favorable foreign currency exchange rates.

Cargo and Other Revenues - Cargo revenues increased 1%, or $1 million, in the September 2003 quarter. Cargo ton miles decreased 6%, while cargo ton mile yield increased 6%. Other revenues decreased 10%, or $14 million. The decrease in other revenues primarily reflects a 4% decrease due to codeshare contract amendments effective in the September 2003 quarter and a 4% decline related to codeshare revenue.

Operating expenses for the September 2003 quarter totaled $3.5 billion, a 7% decrease from $3.8 billion in the September 2002 quarter. Operating capacity declined 6% to 35 billion available seat miles. Cost per available seat mile decreased 1% to 10.21¢ from 10.33¢. The reduction in operating expenses and cost per available seat mile primarily reflects (1) $225 million of asset writedowns, restructuring and related items, net and (2) $34 million of Stabilization Act compensation. These items were recorded during the September 2002 quarter and are discussed below.

Salaries and related costs increased 1% to $1.6 billion. This primarily reflects a 5% increase due to higher pension expense (which includes savings realized in 2003 from changes to our non-pilot pension plan), a 2% increase due to salary and benefit rate increases, primarily for pilots in the June 2003 quarter, and a 1% increase due to growth in our wholly owned regional jet operations. These increases were partially offset by a 7% decrease resulting from our 2002 workforce reduction programs.

Aircraft fuel expense totaled $482 million during the September 2003 quarter, a 3% increase. This primarily reflects a 9% rise due to higher fuel prices, a 4% increase resulting from growth in our wholly owned regional jet operations and a 1% increase due to lower fuel hedge gains, partially offset by an 11% decrease due to capacity reductions and fuel efficiencies. The average fuel price per gallon increased 11% to 79.15¢. Total gallons consumed decreased 7%. Our fuel cost is shown net of fuel hedge gains of $26 million in the September 2003 quarter and $32 million in the September 2002 quarter. Approximately 53% and 50% of our aircraft fuel requirements were hedged during the

Depreciation and amortization expense increased 3%. This primarily reflects a 2% increase in depreciation resulting from regional jet aircraft purchases and a 2% rise due to an increase in software amortization associated with completed technology projects.

Contracted services expense decreased 19%, primarily reflecting a 5% decline from the suspension of air carrier security fees under the Appropriations Act, a 3% decrease due to information technology-related costs, and a 3% decrease due to reduced capacity and traffic. For additional information about the Appropriations Act, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 20-21) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

Landing fees and other rents remained relatively flat, primarily reflecting a 1% increase due to higher facility rates offset by a 1% decrease in landing fees mainly from reduced capacity. Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs expense decreased 11%, primarily from reduced maintenance volume and materials consumption as a result of process improvement initiatives, lower capacity and our fleet simplification program. Aircraft rent increased 4% primarily reflecting a 3% rise due to our decision in the December 2002 quarter to return certain leased B-737-300 aircraft to service during 2003 and a 1% increase due to sale-leaseback transactions completed in the December 2002 quarter. For additional information about the return to service of the leased B-737-300 aircraft, see Note 16 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 59-61) in our Annual Report.

Other selling expenses declined 9%, primarily reflecting a 9% decrease due to lower booking fees mainly from decreased traffic and a 4% decline resulting from the sale of mileage credits under our SkyMiles program since a portion of this revenue is recorded as an offset to other selling expenses. These decreases were partially offset by a 4% increase due to higher advertising costs related to the ramp up of Song, our new low-fare operation which began service in April 2003. Passenger commissions expense declined 28%, primarily reflecting an 11% decrease due to the change in our commission rate structure in the prior year, which resulted in the elimination of travel agent base commissions for tickets sold in the U.S. and Canada, and an 8% decline from the cancellation or re-negotiation of certain travel agent contracts. Passenger service expense decreased 9%, primarily due to lower cleaning and food costs resulting from capacity reductions, and certain meal service-related cost savings initiatives.

During the September 2003 quarter, we recorded a $7 million ($5 million net of tax, or $0.04 diluted earnings per share) reduction to operating expenses reflecting revised estimates of remaining costs for certain prior year restructuring reserves. During the September 2002 quarter, asset writedowns, restructuring and related items, net totaled $225 million ($142 million net of tax, or $1.15 diluted earnings per share) reflecting (1) $220 million of asset writedowns related to certain B-727-200 and MD-11 aircraft, and MD-11 spare parts inventory; (2) $18 million for expenses related to the temporary carrying cost of surplus pilots and grounded aircraft resulting from our capacity reductions which became effective on November 1, 2001, as well as related requalification training and relocation costs for certain pilots; and (3) a $13 million reduction to operating expenses due to revised estimates of remaining costs for certain prior year restructuring reserves.

Stabilization Act compensation totaled $34 million ($22 million net of tax, or $0.18 diluted earnings per share) for the September 2002 quarter. This amount represented the final installment of

compensation under the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act (Stabilization Act). For additional information about the Stabilization Act, see Note 19 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 63-64) in our Annual Report.

Other operating expenses decreased 8%, primarily due to lower insurance rates associated with U.S. government-provided insurance policies in 2003, lower volume-related insurance premiums due to decreased operations and re-negotiated insurance rates.

We incurred an operating loss of $81 million for the September 2003 quarter, compared to an operating loss of $385 million in the September 2002 quarter. Operating margin, which is the ratio of operating income (loss) to operating revenues, was (2%) and (11%) for the September 2003 and September 2002 quarters, respectively.

Other expense, net in the September 2003 quarter was $173 million, compared to other expense, net of $142 million in the September 2002 quarter. This change is primarily attributable to the following:

•

Interest expense increased $21 million in the September 2003 quarter compared to the September 2002 quarter primarily due to higher levels of debt outstanding.

•

We recorded a gain on extinguishment of debt in the September 2003 quarter of $15 million ($9 million net of tax, or $0.08 diluted earnings per share) related to the completion of a debt exchange offer in September 2003. For additional information about the debt exchange offer, see Note 5 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

•

Fair value adjustments of derivatives accounted for under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133), resulted in a charge of $1 million in the September 2003 quarter compared to a gain of $10 million in the September 2002 quarter. These adjustments relate to derivative instruments we use in our fuel hedging program and our equity warrants and other similar rights in certain companies, primarily priceline.com, Incorporated (priceline) and Republic Airways Holdings, Inc. (Republic). For additional information about SFAS 133, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

•

Miscellaneous expense, net was $11 million for the September 2003 quarter compared to miscellaneous income, net of $4 million for the September 2002 quarter. This change is primarily due to income from our equity investment in Worldspan recorded in the September 2002 quarter. We sold this investment in June 2003.

Our unaudited consolidated net loss was $446 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 ($3.71 diluted loss per share), compared to a net loss of $909 million ($7.46 diluted loss per

Operating revenues totaled $9.9 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, a 1% decrease from the depressed level recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Passenger revenues decreased 1% to $9.2 billion. This 1% decrease in passenger revenues, in conjunction with 6% lower capacity, resulted in a 6% rise in passenger revenue per available seat mile. Revenue passenger miles decreased 4% on a capacity decline of 6%, while passenger mile yield increased 4%. For additional information about factors impacting our passenger revenues for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, see the Business Environment section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.

North American Passenger Revenues - North American passenger revenues decreased 1% to $7.4 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Revenue passenger miles decreased 1% on a capacity decrease of 4%, while passenger mile yield increased 1%. Load factors increased by 2.1 points, reflecting the 1% decline in revenue passenger miles and 4% decrease in capacity.

International Passenger Revenues - International passenger revenues decreased 7% to $1.6 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Revenue passenger miles decreased 15% on a capacity decline of 15%, while passenger mile yield increased 9%. The decline in international revenue passenger miles, particularly in the Atlantic region, is due to the reduction in traffic in the period leading up to and during the military action in Iraq. The increase in passenger mile yield primarily relates to the reduction of capacity in certain markets and favorable foreign currency exchange rates.

Cargo and Other Revenues - Cargo revenues increased 2%, or $8 million, for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, which primarily reflects higher European import volume and rates (including increased surcharges), and favorable foreign currency exchange rates, partially offset by a lower volume of first class mail. Cargo ton miles decreased 7%, while cargo ton mile yield increased 10%. Other revenues decreased 5%, or $21 million. The decrease in other revenues primarily reflects a 6% decrease due to lower revenue from certain mileage partnership arrangements and a 4% decline related to codeshare revenue, which was partially offset by a 5% increase resulting from higher miscellaneous revenues primarily due to new passenger and ticketing policies such as higher fees for excess baggage, established in mid-2002.

Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 totaled $10.3 billion, a 6% decrease from $10.9 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Operating capacity declined 6% to 100 billion available seat miles. Cost per available seat mile increased 1% to 10.35¢. The changes in operating expenses and cost per available seat mile reflect (1) our receipt of $398 million under the Appropriations Act during the June 2003 quarter, which was recorded as an offset to operating expenses, (2) $225 million of asset writedowns, restructuring and related items, net recorded during the September 2002 quarter and (3) $34 million of Stabilization Act compensation received during the September 2002 quarter. These items are discussed below.

Salaries and related costs increased 4% to $4.8 billion. This primarily reflects a 5% increase

due to higher pension expense (which includes savings realized in 2003 from changes to our non-pilot pension plan); a 2% increase due to salary and benefit rate increases for pilots in the June 2002 and 2003 quarters, and mechanics in the June 2002 quarter; and a 2% increase due to growth in our wholly owned regional jet operations. These increases were partially offset by a 5% decrease due to headcount reductions related to our 2002 workforce reduction programs.

Aircraft fuel expense totaled $1.4 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2003, an 18% increase due primarily to higher fuel prices, partially offset by capacity reductions. The average fuel price per gallon increased 26% to 80.80¢. Total gallons consumed decreased 6%. Our fuel cost is shown net of fuel hedge gains of $131 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and $96 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Approximately 72% and 60% of our aircraft fuel requirements were hedged during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Depreciation and amortization expense increased 4%. This increase is primarily due to a 2% rise resulting from regional jet aircraft purchased since September 30, 2002, and a 2% increase in software amortization associated with completed technology projects.

Contracted services expense decreased 13% primarily reflecting a 2% decline due to reduced traffic and capacity, a 2% decline resulting from the suspension of the air carrier security fees under the Appropriations Act, a 2% decrease due to information technology-related costs and a 1% decline related to lower maintenance expenses. For additional information about the Appropriations Act, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 20-21) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

Landing fees and other rents rose 3%, reflecting a 4% increase due to higher landing fee and facility rates, partially offset by a 1% decrease in landing fees resulting from reduced capacity. Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs expense decreased 15%, primarily from reduced maintenance volume and materials consumption as a result of process improvements initiatives, lower capacity and our fleet simplification program. Aircraft rent expense rose 2% mainly due to our decision in the December 2002 quarter to return our leased B-737-300 aircraft to service during 2003. For additional information related to this decision, see Note 16 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 59-61) in our Annual Report.

Other selling expenses fell 14%, primarily reflecting a 9% decrease due to lower booking fees mainly resulting from decreased traffic and a 3% decline resulting from the sale of mileage credits under our SkyMiles program since a portion of this revenue is recorded as an offset to other selling expenses. Passenger commissions expense declined 41%, primarily reflecting a 26% decrease due to the change in our commission rate structure in the prior year, which resulted in the elimination of travel agent base commissions for tickets sold in the U.S. and Canada. The decrease in passenger commissions also reflects a 5% decline resulting from the cancellation or re-negotiation of certain travel agent contracts and a 4% decrease due to a lower volume of base commissions and incentive commissions. Passenger service expense decreased 16%, primarily reflecting a 12% decrease due to lower cleaning and food costs resulting from capacity reductions, and a 6% decrease due to certain meal service-related cost savings initiatives.

Asset writedowns, restructuring and related items, net totaled $36 million ($23 million net of

tax, or $0.18 diluted earnings per share) for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to $288 million ($182 million net of tax, or $1.48 diluted earnings per share) for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Our net charge for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 reflects a $43 million charge for the cost of pension and postretirement obligations for participants in our 2002 workforce reduction programs, offset by a $7 million reduction to operating expenses resulting from revised estimates of remaining costs for certain prior year restructuring reserves. Our net charge for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 reflects (1) $220 million of asset writedowns related to certain B-727-200 and MD-11 aircraft, and MD-11 spare parts inventory; (2) $81 million for expenses related to the temporary carrying cost of surplus pilots and grounded aircraft resulting from our capacity reductions which became effective on November 1, 2001, as well as related requalification training and relocation costs for certain pilots; and (3) a $13 million reduction to operating expenses due to revised estimates of remaining costs for certain prior year restructuring reserves.

Appropriations Act reimbursements totaled $398 million ($251 million net of tax, or $2.03 diluted earnings per share) for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. These reimbursements from the U.S. government were for our proportional share of passenger and air carrier security fees. For additional information about the Appropriations Act, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 20-21) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

Stabilization Act compensation totaled $34 million ($22 million net of tax, or $0.18 diluted earnings per share) for the September 2002 quarter. This represented the final installment of compensation under the Stabilization Act. For additional information about the Stabilization Act, see Note 19 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 63-64) in our Annual Report.

Other operating expenses fell 10%, primarily reflecting a 7% decrease due to lower insurance rates under U.S. government-provided insurance policies and lower volume-related insurance premiums due to decreased operations, a 2% decline due to lower communication and supplies expenses, and a 1% decrease as a result of lower miscellaneous expenses.

We incurred an operating loss of $420 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, compared to an operating loss of $947 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Operating margin, which is the ratio of operating income (loss) to operating revenues, was (4%) and (9%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, respectively.

Other expense, net for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 was $257 million, compared to other expense, net of $469 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. This change is primarily attributable to the following:

•

Interest expense increased $60 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002 primarily due to higher levels of debt outstanding, partially offset by the effects of interest rate swap agreements.

•

Gain on sale of investments increased $287 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2002 primarily due to a $279 million gain ($176 million net of tax, or $1.42 diluted earnings per share) from the sale of our equity investment in Worldspan during the June 2003 quarter. For additional information about the sale of our equity investment in Worldspan, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 20-21) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

•

Gain (loss) on extinguishment of debt was zero for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 due to a $15 million loss resulting from our repurchase of a portion of outstanding Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) Notes in 2003, offset by a $15 million gain related to the completion of our debt exchange offer in September 2003. For additional information about this repurchase of ESOP Notes and our debt exchange offer, see Note 5 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 13-14) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 and Note 5 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, respectively.

•

Fair value adjustments of derivatives accounted for under SFAS 133 resulted in a charge of $16 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to a $33 million charge for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. These adjustments relate to derivative instruments we use in our fuel hedging program and our equity warrants and other similar rights in certain companies, primarily priceline and Republic. For additional information about SFAS 133, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

•

Miscellaneous expense, net was $10 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003 compared to miscellaneous income, net of $19 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. This change is primarily due to a decrease in earnings from our equity investment in Worldspan, which we sold in the June 2003 quarter, and losses in the March and September 2003 quarters for the reduction in value of certain investments.

Cash and cash equivalents totaled $2.7 billion at September 30, 2003, compared to $2.0 billion at December 31, 2002. For the nine months ended September 30, 2003, net cash provided by operating activities totaled $371 million, which includes the following significant items:

•

Net tax refunds totaling $397 million received during the nine months ended September 30, 2003.

•

Our net loss of $446 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. This reflects the depressed revenue environment and cost pressures, partially offset by $398 million ($251 million net of tax) in passenger and air carrier security fee reimbursements we received under the Appropriations Act during the June 2003 quarter.

•

Our payment totaling $76 million to fund a defined benefit pension plan during the March 2003 quarter.

•

Our provision of additional cash collateral totaling $71 million primarily to support certain projected insurance obligations. These amounts are recorded in restricted cash on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Capital expenditures during the nine months ended September 30, 2003 totaled approximately $1.2 billion and included the acquisition of 31 CRJ-200 and 18 CRJ-700 aircraft. Of these regional jet

aircraft, 41 were acquired through seller financing arrangements for $680 million. Capital expenditures for the three months ending December 31, 2003 are expected to be $234 million, including approximately $45 million for regional jet aircraft.

On June 30, 2003, we sold our 40% equity investment in Worldspan. In consideration for this sale, we received $285 million in cash and a $45 million subordinated promissory note, which bears interest at 10% per annum and matures in 2012. We will also receive credits totaling approximately $125 million, which will be recognized ratably over nine years, for future Worldspan-provided services. At September 30, 2003, the carrying and fair value of the subordinated promissory note was $37 million. For additional information about the sale of our equity investment in Worldspan, see Note 13 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 20-21) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003.

Debt and capital lease obligations, including current maturities and short-term obligations, totaled $12.5 billion at September 30, 2003 compared to $10.9 billion at December 31, 2002. During 2003, we have taken the following actions that impacted our liquidity (for additional information related to these transactions, see Note 5 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003 (pages 13-14) and in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003 (pages 14-15)):

•

In January 2003, we issued in a private placement $392 million principal amount of insured, secured enhanced equipment trust certificates.

•

In April 2003, we terminated our credit facility under which we were able to borrow up to $500 million on a secured basis until August 21, 2003. No borrowings were outstanding under this facility. The aircraft previously reserved for collateral under this facility are now being used as collateral for the General Electric Capital Corporation (GECC) financing arrangements and the $138 million financing described below.

•

In April 2003, we entered into three floating rate, secured financing arrangements with GECC under which we borrowed a total of $352 million which is due in installments through 2010.

•

In April 2003, we borrowed $138 million due in installments through April 2018, which is secured by certain aircraft.

•

In May 2003, GECC issued $409 million of irrevocable, direct-pay letters of credit to support our obligations related to $403 million principal amount of outstanding municipal bonds. This transaction replaced $409 million of irrevocable, direct-pay letters of credit issued by a third party that were due to expire in June 2003.

•

In June 2003, we issued, in private placements, $350 million of our 8% Convertible Senior Notes due 2023.

•

In July 2003, we entered into financing arrangements under which we borrowed a total of $286 million, which are due in installments through May 2021 and secured by certain regional jet aircraft.

•

In September 2003, we completed a debt exchange offer related to $800 million outstanding principal amount of notes due in 2004 and 2005 (Old Notes). As a result of this exchange offer, $262 million of the Old Notes were tendered for cash and $211 million principal amount of new notes, net of a discount, due in 2008.

Shareowners’ equity was $497 million at September 30, 2003 and $893 million at December 31, 2002. The decrease in shareowners’ equity is primarily due to our net loss for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. As discussed in the Business Environment section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q, we expect to record a net loss between $365 million to $415 million in the December 2003 quarter. As a result of this expected net loss, along with the estimated additional minimum pension liability adjustment we will record at December 31, 2003, we estimate we will have negative shareowners’ equity of approximately $600 million at December 31, 2003. These items will also have the effect of limiting our ability to pay dividends on our stock, or redeeming or purchasing our stock for cash or other property, generally unless we have a sufficient surplus as defined by Delaware General Corporation Law. This will impact our Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock (ESOP Preferred Stock). See the discussion below for additional information about (1) the additional minimum pension liability adjustment we will record at December 31, 2003 and (2) the impact to our ESOP Preferred Stock.

See page 21 of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in our Annual Report for a summary of certain contractual obligations as of December 31, 2002. Since that date, there have been significant changes to our contractual obligations related to debt and estimated future expenditures for aircraft and engines. For information about these contractual obligations at September 30, 2003 and subsequent events that impact these obligations, see Notes 5, 6 and 12 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q and Future Fleet Capital Expenditures discussed below.

At December 31, 2003, we will record an additional minimum pension liability adjustment to equity which is currently estimated to be approximately $700 million, net of tax. This non-cash adjustment will affect our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2003, but will not impact our Consolidated Statement of Operations for the December 2003 quarter. The actual adjustment may differ materially from the estimated adjustment because it will be based on, among other things, our accumulated benefit obligation under our defined benefit pension plans at September 30, 2003, which has not yet been determined.

During the December 2003 quarter, we will record a non-cash settlement charge in operating expenses on our Consolidated Statements of Operations, which is currently estimated to be approximately $140 million, net of tax, related to our pilots’ defined benefit pension plan. The actual charge may differ materially from the estimated charge because it will be based on, among other things, our projected benefit obligation under the pilots’ defined benefit pension plan at September 30, 2003, which has not yet been determined.

We have paid our minimum required funding obligations for our defined benefit pension plans in 2003. Estimates of our future funding obligations under these plans are based on various

assumptions, including the actual market performance of the plan assets, future 30-year U.S. Treasury bond yields and regulatory requirements. Our estimated funding obligation for our defined benefit pension plans in 2004 is between $350 million and $450 million. Our funding obligations under these plans in later years are not reasonably estimable at this time because these estimates vary materially depending on the assumptions used. Nevertheless, we presently expect that our funding obligations under our defined benefit pension plans in each of the years from 2005 through 2007 will be substantially larger than our estimated funding obligations for 2004.

For additional information about our additional minimum pension liability adjustment and settlement charge, see Note 12 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q. For additional information about our defined benefit pension plans, see Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 51-55) in our Annual Report and Note 9 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (page 16) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003.

Delaware Law generally prohibits a company from paying dividends on its stock, or redeeming or purchasing its stock for cash or other property, unless the company has sufficient surplus. Surplus is generally defined as the excess of a company’s net assets over the aggregate par value of its issued stock. Due to the effect of our expected net loss and the additional minimum pension liability adjustment, both discussed above, we believe we will have a negative surplus at December 31, 2003. Accordingly, effective in December 2003, our Board of Directors took the following actions related to our ESOP Preferred Stock to comply with Delaware Law:

•

Suspended indefinitely the payment of dividends on our ESOP Preferred Stock. Unpaid dividends will accrue without interest until paid at a rate of $4.32 per share per year. The ESOP Preferred Stock is held by Fidelity Management Trust Company in its capacity as trustee for the Delta Family-Care Savings Plan, a broad-based employee benefit plan (Savings Plan).

•

Changed the form of payment we will use to redeem shares of ESOP Preferred Stock when redemptions are required under the Savings Plan. For the indefinite future, we will pay the redemption price of $72 per share plus accrued and unpaid dividends in shares of our common stock rather than in cash.

At October 31, 2003, approximately 5.9 million shares of ESOP Preferred Stock were held by the Savings Plan. About 3.7 million shares of ESOP Preferred Stock are currently allocated to the accounts of Savings Plan participants; the remainder of the shares is available for allocation in the future.

Each share of ESOP Preferred Stock is redeemable at $72.00 plus accrued and unpaid dividends. The terms of the ESOP Preferred Stock permit us to pay the redemption price in cash or shares of Delta common stock. We are generally required to redeem shares of ESOP Preferred Stock (1) to provide for distributions of the accounts of Savings Plan participants who terminate employment with us; and (2) to implement annual diversification elections by Savings Plan participants who are at least age 55 and have participated in the Savings Plan for at least ten years.

An average of approximately 20,000 shares of ESOP Preferred Stock is currently redeemed each month under the Savings Plan, resulting in an average aggregate monthly redemption price of $1.4 million plus accrued and unpaid dividends. At this rate, and assuming a Delta common stock price of $12.00 per share, we estimate that we will issue approximately 3.5 million shares of our common stock over the next two years to redeem ESOP Preferred Stock. The actual number of shares of our common stock issued may differ materially from this estimate because the actual number of shares will depend on various factors, including the duration of the period during which we may not redeem ESOP Preferred Stock for cash under Delaware General Corporation Law; the fair value of Delta common stock when ESOP Preferred Stock is redeemed; and the number of shares of ESOP Preferred Stock redeemed by Savings Plan participants who terminate their employment with us or elect to diversify their Savings Plan accounts.

For additional information about our ESOP Preferred Stock, see Notes 11 and 12 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 51-57) in our Annual Report.

In October 2003, we entered into a definitive agreement to sell 11 B-737-800 aircraft to a third party immediately after those aircraft are delivered to us by the manufacturer in 2005. This transaction will reduce our capital expenditures by approximately $500 million through 2005. In October 2003, we recorded a $26 million charge, net of tax, as a result of this transaction. For additional information about this definitive agreement, including our contingent obligation to make certain payments to the third party and the third party’s option to purchase additional aircraft from us, see Note 12 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Additionally, we have deferred delivery of one B-737-800 aircraft and plan to defer delivery of an additional seven B-737-800 aircraft until 2008. These aircraft were originally scheduled for delivery in 2005. The deferral of these B-737-800 aircraft will reduce capital expenditures over the next few years. We currently intend to accept delivery of two B-777-200 aircraft in 2005, which will be our only mainline aircraft deliveries during that year once the B-737-800 aircraft are deferred.

At September 30, 2003, we had negative working capital of $1.6 billion compared to negative working capital of $2.6 billion at December 31, 2002. This change in our negative working capital balance is primarily due to (1) the increase in our cash and cash equivalents, which is discussed above, and (2) the increase in accounts receivable, net resulting from the termination of our sale of receivables agreement (for additional information about this agreement, see Note 6 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (page 15) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2003). A negative working capital position is normal for us, typically due to our air traffic liability and the fact that we primarily generate revenue by providing air transportation through the utilization of property and equipment, which are classified as long-term assets.

At September 30, 2003, we estimate that the value of our unencumbered aircraft assets is approximately $2.3 billion, approximately $400 million of which consists of MD-11 and MD-90 aircraft that are eligible under Section 1110 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The values of our unencumbered aircraft assets were derived by us from published third party estimates of the “base value” of similar aircraft using certain assumptions and may not accurately reflect the current market value of the aircraft. Base value is an estimate of the underlying economic value of an aircraft based on historic and future value trends in a stable market environment, while current market value is the value of the aircraft in the actual market; both methods assume an aircraft is in average condition and in its “highest and best use.” Given the difficult business environment, there is no assurance we would have access to financing using these aircraft as collateral. In any event, the amount we could finance using these aircraft would be significantly less than their base value.

We expect to meet our obligations as they come due through available cash and cash equivalents, investments, internally generated funds and borrowings. We do not have any existing undrawn lines of credit other than certain financing commitments from a third party related to the acquisition of regional jet aircraft. While we expect new financing to be available to us, access to such financing cannot be assured given the existing business environment and the composition of our currently available unencumbered assets discussed above. Failure to obtain new financing could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity.

On September 30, 2003, our senior unsecured long-term debt was rated B3 by Moody’s and B by Standard & Poor’s. Both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s ratings outlook for our senior unsecured long-term debt are negative. For additional information related to our credit ratings, see page 20 of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in our Annual Report.

We are subject to price risk associated with our jet fuel purchases. We manage this risk with our fuel hedging program. At September 30, 2003, the fair value of our derivative instruments, consisting of heating and crude oil contracts, was $70 million, compared to $73 million at December 31, 2002. A 10% decrease in the average annual price of heating and crude oil would have decreased the fair value of these instruments by $39 million at September 30, 2003. We do not enter into fuel hedge contracts for speculative purposes.

The following table shows our fuel hedging position based on instruments held at October 31, 2003:

For additional information regarding our fuel hedging program, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q. For additional information regarding our other exposures to market risks, see “Market Risks Associated With Financial Instruments” (pages 23-24), as well as Notes 2, 3, and 4 (pages 37-41) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in our Annual Report.

Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2003 in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in our reports filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2003 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

To the Board of Directors and Shareowners of
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of September 30, 2003, and the related consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002. These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such condensed consolidated interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have previously audited, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of December 31, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and shareowners’ equity for the year then ended (not presented herein); our report dated January 31, 2003, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements and included explanatory paragraphs relating to (1) the Company’s change in its method of accounting for goodwill and other intangible assets to conform with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 and (2) the application of procedures relating to certain revised disclosures in Notes 5, 9, 17 and 21 related to the 2001 and 2000 consolidated financial statements that were audited by other auditors who have ceased operations and for which we have expressed no opinion or other form of assurance other than with respect to such disclosures. In our opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2002 is fairly stated, in all material respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been derived.

Hall, et al. v. United Airlines, et al. As discussed on page 17 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 (Form 10-K), in January 2002, a travel agent in North Carolina filed an class action lawsuit against numerous airlines, including Delta, in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina on behalf of all travel agents in the United States which sold tickets from September 1, 1997 to the present on any of the defendant airlines. The lawsuit alleges that Delta and the other airline defendants conspired to fix travel agent commissions in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. The plaintiff, who has requested a jury trial, is seeking in its complaint injunctive relief; costs and attorneys’ fees; and unspecified damages, to be trebled under the antitrust laws.

In September 2002, the District Court granted the plaintiff’s motion for class action certification, certifying a class consisting of all travel agents in the United States, Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands which sold tickets on the defendant airlines between 1997 and 2002.

On October 30, 2003, the District Court granted summary judgment against the plaintiff class, dismissing all claims asserted against Delta and most other defendants. Plaintiffs are expected to appeal.

Litigation Re September 11 Terrorist Attacks. Delta is a defendant in approximately 180 lawsuits arising out of the events of September 11, 2001, when terrorists hijacked and crashed four commercial aircraft operated by other airlines. Although the theory of liability is not fully clear, it appears the plaintiffs are alleging that Delta and many other air carriers are jointly liable for damages resulting from the September 11 attacks based on a theory of shared responsibility for passenger security screening at Boston, Dulles and Newark airports. All litigation arising out of the September 11 attacks is consolidated in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Virtually all of the cases against Delta were filed after September 9, 2003 when the District Court denied the airlines’ motions to dismiss the claims of the victims on the ground. These lawsuits, which are in preliminary stages, generally seek unspecified damages, including punitive damages.

The Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act established an alternative process whereby claimants may seek compensation from a Victim Compensation Fund (VCF). Claimants who seek compensation from the VCF may not also pursue litigation against air carriers arising out of the events of September 11. It is possible that some of the plaintiffs in the lawsuits in which Delta is a party may elect instead to pursue compensation through the VCF. The deadline for applying for compensation under the VCF is December 22, 2003.

The Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act limits the financial liability of any air carrier for compensatory and punitive damages arising out of the September 11 attacks to no more than the limits of liability insurance coverage maintained by the air carrier.

We are vigorously defending these matters. Although the ultimate outcome of these matters cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes that the resolution of these actions will not have a material adverse effect on our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.


10.1		First Amendment to Deltashare Stock Option Plan, effective as of April 25, 2003.

10.2		Amendment to Pilots Stock Option Plan, effective as of April 25, 2003.

10.3		First Amendment to 2000 Performance Compensation Plan effective, as of April 25, 2003.

10.4		Form of Executive Life Insurance Assignment Agreement executed by Leo F. Mullin, Frederick W. Reid, M. Michele Burns, Vicki B. Escarra and Robert L. Colman, dated July 1, 2003 (under cover of an executive summary).

10.5		Form of Waiver of compensation in connection with Delta’s contract with the United States government pursuant to the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2003, dated as of July 24, 2003, executed by Leo F. Mullin and Frederick W. Reid (under cover of an executive summary).

12		Computation of ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed charges.

15		Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information.

31.1		Certification by Delta’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer with Respect to Delta’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003.

31.2		Certification by Delta’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with Respect to Delta’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003.

32		Certification pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code by Delta’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with respect to Delta’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003.

No Reports on Form 8-K were filed during the three months ended September 30, 2003.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


Exhibit No.		Description

10.1		First Amendment to Deltashare Stock Option Plan, effective April 25, 2003.

10.2		Amendment to Pilots Stock Option Plan, effective April 25, 2003.

10.3		First Amendment to 2000 Performance Compensation Plan, effective April 25, 2003.

10.4		Form of Executive Life Insurance Assignment Agreement executed by Leo F. Mullin, Frederick W. Reid, M. Michele Burns, Vicki B. Escarra and Robert L. Colman, dated July 1, 2003 (under cover of an executive summary).

10.5		Form of Waiver of compensation in connection with Delta’s contract with the United States government pursuant to the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2003, dated as of July 24, 2003, executed by Leo F. Mullin and Frederick W. Reid (under cover of an executive summary).

12		Computation of ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed charges.

15		Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information.

31.1		Certification by Delta’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer with Respect to Delta’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003.

31.2		Certification by Delta’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with Respect to Delta’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003.

32		Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code by Delta’s Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with respect to Delta’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2003.

40 EX-10.1 3 g85759exv10w1.txt EXHIBIT 10.1 EXHIBIT 10.1 DELTA AIR LINES, INC. FIRST AMENDMENT TO DELTASHARE STOCK OPTION PLAN THIS FIRST AMENDMENT ("Amendment") to the Delta Air Lines, Inc. DeltaShare Stock Option Plan (the "Plan") amends the Plan effective as of such time as this Amendment is approved by the shareowners of the Company. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein will have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan. 1. Section 2.16 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: "2.16 "Stock" means the Common Stock, $1.50 par value, of the Company." 2. Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: "4.1 Stock Reserved. The total number of shares of Stock reserved and available for distribution under the Plan shall be 29,400,000, which number reflects the two-for-one split of the Common Stock of the Company effective in 1998. Stock issued under the Plan may be either authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such number of shares of Stock as are subject to Stock Options that are cancelled pursuant to the Stock Option Exchange Program (as defined in Article 12 hereof) and as are necessary to grant Replacement Options (as defined in Article 12 hereof) in exchange for such cancelled Stock Options will again be available for distribution pursuant to such Replacement Options and, otherwise, shares of Stock subject to such cancelled Stock Options will not be available for distribution under the Plan." 3. The Plan is amended to add the following Article 12, which reads in its entirety as follows: "ARTICLE 12 - STOCK OPTION EXCHANGE PROGRAM 12.1 In General. At such time as the Committee determines advisable, the Company will be permitted (but not required) to offer certain Participants, to be designated by the Committee in its sole discretion ("Eligible Participants"), who hold Eligible Options (as defined below), a one-time opportunity to elect to surrender such Eligible Participant's Eligible Options for cancellation ("Surrendered Options") in exchange for the grant of replacement options to purchase shares of Stock to be granted under the Plan ("Replacement Options") on a date to be determined by the Committee that is no less than six months and one day following the cancellation of such Surrendered Options (such exchange, the "Stock Option Exchange Program"). The Stock Option Exchange Program and the Replacement Options shall have the terms and conditions set forth or provided for in this Article 12. Except to the extent otherwise determined by the Committee, the Stock Option Exchange Program will be structured so that the Company avoids incurring financial accounting charges as a result thereof. To participate in the Stock Option Exchange Program and receive any grant of Replacement Options, a Participant must be an Eligible Participant on each of the following dates: (i) the date the Stock Option Exchange Program commences, (ii) the date the period during which Surrendered Options may be surrendered for cancellation pursuant to the Stock Option Exchange Program expires and (iii) the date of grant of the Replacement Options. 12.2 Eligible Options. For purposes of the Stock Option Exchange Program, the term "Eligible Option" shall mean an outstanding Stock Option granted under the Plan having an Option Price equal to or in excess of $25.00 per share. 12.3 Exchange Ratio. In exchange for three shares of Stock subject to Surrendered Options, a Replacement Option to purchase one share of Stock will be granted, subject to any adjustments for transactions or events specified in Section 4.2 of the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the number of shares subject to a Replacement Option determined by application of the foregoing exchange ratio is a fractional number, such fractional number will be rounded up to the nearest whole number for the purposes of determining the number of such shares. In determining the number of Replacement Options to be granted in exchange for Surrendered Options, the foregoing exchange ratio shall be applied separately to Surrendered Options having the same Grant Date and the resulting number of Replacement Options shall then be rounded in accordance with the foregoing. 12.4 Terms of Replacement Options. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, Replacement Options shall have the terms set forth in this Section 12.4 and such other terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee in accordance with the provisions hereof. 12.4.1. Exercise Price. The price at which a share of Stock covered by a Replacement Option may be purchased shall be the closing price of the Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant, if the date is a trading day, and, if not, on the previous trading day. 12.4.2. Option Exercise Period and Term. Each Replacement Option will become exercisable on the first anniversary of its date of grant and immediately exercisable, vested and nonforfeitable upon a change in control of the Company. For the purpose of the foregoing, a "change in control of the Company" shall have such meaning as may be determined by the Committee in 2 accordance with the provisions hereof. Subject to Article 7 of the Plan, each Replacement Option, once exercisable, will be exercisable for the remaining term of the Surrendered Options in exchange for which it is granted and for an additional period of time beyond such remaining term equal to the period of time from the date of cancellation of such Surrendered Options through and including the date of grant of such Replacement Option. Following such period for which a Replacement Option is exercisable, such Replacement Option shall expire and no shares of Stock may be purchased thereunder. 12.4.3. Non-Qualified Options. All Replacement Options shall be deemed "non-qualified" for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any successor thereto. 12.5 Administration. In addition to the authority of the Committee set forth in Section 3.2 of the Plan, which authority the Committee shall have with respect to the Stock Option Exchange Program and the Replacement Options, the Committee shall have full discretionary authority to establish rules, terms and conditions for the commencement, continuation and/or consummation of the Stock Option Exchange Program, to establish the forms of award agreements for Replacement Options, to determine the extent to which the Stock Option Exchange Program will result in the Company incurring financial accounting charges and to adopt such further rules, terms and conditions relating to the Stock Option Exchange Program and the Replacement Options that are consistent with the provisions set forth in this Article 12, including, without limitation, provisions specifying and/or limiting the Eligible Participants. The Committee will have total and exclusive responsibility to control, operate, manage and administer the Stock Option Exchange Program in accordance with its terms and conditions and all the authority that may be necessary or helpful to enable it to discharge its responsibilities with respect to the Stock Option Exchange Program. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentences, the Committee will have the exclusive right to interpret the Stock Option Exchange Program, decide all questions concerning eligibility for and the terms of the exchange pursuant to the Stock Option Exchange Program, construe any ambiguous provision of the Stock Option Exchange Program, correct any default, supply any omission, reconcile any inconsistency, and decide all questions arising in the administration, interpretation and application of the Stock Option Exchange Program. The Committee will have full discretionary authority in all matters related to the discharge of its responsibilities and the exercise of its authority under the Program, including, without limitation, its construction of the terms of the Stock Option Exchange Program. It is the intent of the Stock Option Exchange Program that the decisions of the Committee and its actions with respect to the Stock Option Exchange Program will be final and binding upon all persons having or claiming to have any right or interest in or under the Stock Option Exchange Program. 3 Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee shall have the right in its sole discretion to provide for such modifications and additional terms and conditions ("special terms") to the Stock Option Exchange Program as the Committee may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, policy or custom, or to facilitate administration of the Stock Option Exchange Program. The Committee may adopt or approve sub-plans, appendices or supplements to, or amendments, restatements, or alternative versions of, the Stock Option Exchange Program as it may consider necessary or appropriate for purposes of implementing any special terms, without thereby affecting the terms of the Stock Option Exchange Program." 4. All references in the Plan and this Amendment to the "Plan" shall be deemed to be references to the Plan as amended hereby. Unless the context requires otherwise, references in Sections 3.2, 4.2, 6.2, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 7.2, 7.3, 9.4, 9.6 and the first sentence of Section 7.1 of the Plan to "Stock Options," "Participants" and "Option Price" shall, in addition, be deemed to be references to "Replacement Options," "Eligible Participants" and "the price at which a share of Stock covered by a Replacement Option may be purchased" (as described in Section 12.4.1), respectively. 5. This Amendment does not supersede the terms and conditions of the Plan, except to the extent expressly described herein, and the Plan, as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect as so amended. 4 EX-10.2 4 g85759exv10w2.txt EXHIBIT 10.2 EXHIBIT 10.2 DELTA AIR LINES, INC. AMENDMENT TO PILOTS STOCK OPTION PLAN THIS AMENDMENT ("Amendment") to the Delta Air Lines, Inc. Pilots Stock Option Plan, as amended, (the "Plan") amends the Plan effective as of such time as this Amendment is both approved by the shareowners of the Company and agreed to by the Association. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein will have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan. 1. Section 2.17 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: "2.17 "Stock" means the Common Stock, $1.50 par value, of the Company." 2. Section 4.1 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: "4.1 Stock Reserved. The total number of shares of Stock reserved and available for distribution under the Plan shall be 20,000,000, which number reflects the two-for-one split of the Common Stock of the Company effective in 1998. Stock issued under the Plan may be either authorized and unissued shares or treasury shares. Notwithstanding the foregoing, such number of shares of Stock as are subject to Stock Options that are cancelled pursuant to the Stock Option Exchange Program (as defined in Article 9 hereof) and as are necessary to grant Replacement Options (as defined in Article 9 hereof) in exchange for such cancelled Stock Options will again be available for distribution pursuant to such Replacement Options and, otherwise, shares of Stock subject to such cancelled Stock Options will not be available for distribution under the Plan." 3. The Plan is amended to add the following Article 9, which reads in its entirety as follows: "ARTICLE 9. STOCK OPTION EXCHANGE PROGRAM 9.1 In General. At such time as the Committee determines advisable, the Company will be permitted (but not required) to offer each Eligible Participant (as defined below) who holds Eligible Options (as defined below) a one-time opportunity to elect to surrender all of such Eligible Participant's Eligible Options for cancellation ("Surrendered Options") in exchange for the grant of replacement options to purchase shares of Stock to be granted under the Plan ("Replacement Options") on a date to be determined by the Committee that is no less than six months and one day following the cancellation of such Surrendered Options (such exchange, the "Stock Option Exchange Program"). The Stock Option Exchange Program and the Replacement Options shall have the terms and conditions set forth or provided for in this Article 9. Except to the extent otherwise determined by the Committee, the Stock Option Exchange Program will be structured so that the Company avoids incurring financial accounting charges as a result thereof. To participate in the Stock Option Exchange Program and receive any grant of Replacement Options, an Eligible Participant must be an Eligible Participant on each of the following dates: (i) the date the Stock Option Exchange Program commences, (ii) the date the period during which Surrendered Options may be surrendered for cancellation pursuant to the Stock Option Exchange Program expires and (iii) the date of grant of the Replacement Options. 9.2 Eligible Participants. For purposes of the Stock Option Exchange Program, the term "Eligible Participant" shall mean an employee of the Company whose name appears on the Delta Air Lines Pilots' System Seniority List and who is not on (i) Retirement, (ii) Furlough, (iii) long-term Disability or (iv) Leave of Absence other than Leave of Absence due to military service or due to any other reason as determined by the Committee. 9.3 Eligible Options. For purposes of the Stock Option Exchange Program, the term "Eligible Option" shall mean an outstanding Stock Option granted under the Plan. 9.4 Exchange Ratio. In exchange for three shares of Stock subject to Surrendered Options, a Replacement Option to purchase one share of Stock will be granted, subject to any adjustments for transactions or events specified in Section 4.2 of the Plan. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the number of shares subject to a Replacement Option determined by application of the foregoing exchange ratio is a fractional number, such fractional number will be rounded up to the nearest whole number for the purposes of determining the number of such shares. In determining the number of Replacement Options to be granted in exchange for Surrendered Options, the foregoing exchange ratio shall be applied separately to Surrendered Options having the same grant date and the resulting number of Replacement Options shall then be rounded in accordance with the foregoing. 9.5 Terms of Replacement Options. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, Replacement Options shall have the terms set forth in this Section 9.5 and such other terms and conditions as may be determined by the Committee in accordance with the provisions hereof. 9.5.1. Exercise Price. The price at which a share of Stock covered by a Replacement Option may be purchased shall be the closing price of the Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant, if the date is a trading day, and, if not, on the previous trading day. 2 9.5.2. Option Exercise Period and Term. Each Replacement Option will become exercisable on the first anniversary of its date of grant and immediately exercisable, vested and nonforfeitable upon a change in control of the Company. For the purpose of the foregoing, a "change in control of the Company" shall have such meaning as may be determined by the Committee in accordance with the provisions hereof. Subject to Article 7 of the Plan, each Replacement Option, once exercisable, will be exercisable for the remaining term of the Surrendered Options in exchange for which it is granted and for an additional period of time beyond such remaining term equal to the period of time from the date of cancellation of such Surrendered Options through and including the date of grant of such Replacement Option. Following such period for which a Replacement Option is exercisable, such Replacement Option shall expire and no shares of Stock may be purchased thereunder. 9.5.3. Non-Qualified Options. All Replacement Options shall be deemed "non-qualified" for purposes of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any successor thereto. 9.6 Administration. In addition to the authority of the Committee set forth in Section 3.2 of the Plan, which authority the Committee shall have with respect to the Stock Option Exchange Program and the Replacement Options, the Committee shall have full discretionary authority to establish conditions for the commencement, continuation and/or consummation of the Stock Option Exchange Program, to determine the extent to which the Stock Option Exchange Program will result in the Company incurring financial accounting charges and to adopt such further terms and conditions relating to the Stock Option Exchange Program that are consistent with the provisions set forth in this Article 9. Without limiting the generality of Section 3.2 or of the foregoing, the Committee will have total and exclusive responsibility to control, operate, manage and administer the Stock Option Exchange Program in accordance with its terms and conditions and all the authority that may be necessary or helpful to enable it to discharge its responsibilities with respect to the Stock Option Exchange Program." 4. All references in the Plan and this Amendment to the "Plan" shall be deemed to be references to the Plan as amended hereby. Unless the context requires otherwise, references in Sections 3.2, 4.2, 6.2, 6.5, 6.6, 6.7, 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 8.4, 8.6 of the Plan to "Stock Options," "Participants" and "Option Price" shall, in addition, be deemed to be references to "Replacement Options," "Eligible Participants" and "the price at which a share of Stock covered by a Replacement Option may be purchased" (as described in Section 9.5.1 hereof), respectively. 5. This Amendment does not supersede the terms and conditions of the Plan, except to the extent expressly described herein and the Plan, as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect as so amended. 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amendment is executed as of April 14, 2003. FOR DELTA AIR LINES, INC. FOR THE AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION, INTERNATIONAL By: /s/ Terry M. Erskine By: /s/ Duane E. Woerth -------------------------- -------------------------- Terry M. Erskine Captain Duane E. Woerth Vice-President-Labor Relations President By: /s/ William C. Buergey -------------------------- Captain William C. Buergey Chairman, Delta MEC 4 EX-10.3 5 g85759exv10w3.txt EXHIBIT 10.3 EXHIBIT 10.3 DELTA AIR LINES, INC. FIRST AMENDMENT TO 2000 PERFORMANCE COMPENSATION PLAN THIS FIRST AMENDMENT ("Amendment") to the Delta Air Lines, Inc. 2000 Performance Compensation Plan (the "Plan") amends the Plan effective as of such time as this Amendment is approved by the shareowners of Delta. Capitalized terms not otherwise defined herein will have the meaning ascribed to such terms in the Plan. 1. Section 4.2 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: "4.2 Counting Rules. Shares of Delta Common Stock issued, or reserved for issuance, under the Plan pursuant to an Award granted on or after October 25, 2000, shall be subtracted from the number of shares available for issuance under the Plan. Shares of Delta Common Stock obtained from the following sources shall be added to the total number of shares available for issuance under the Plan: a. shares tendered (actually or by attestation) in payment of the Option Exercise Price upon exercise of a Stock Option or otherwise to exercise an Award; b. shares withheld or tendered (actually or by attestation) for taxes upon exercise of a Stock Option, lapse of restrictions on Restricted Stock, or otherwise in connection with an Award; c. if all or part of an Award is settled in cash rather than in shares of Delta Common Stock, then the number of shares that had been subtracted but are not issued pursuant to such Award, shall be added back; and d. shares relating to an Award that is forfeited or becomes void, including, without limitation, shares that were subject to a Stock Option that is forfeited before it is exercised, or Restricted Stock or an Other Equity-Based Award that is forfeited, and shares subject to Stock Options that are cancelled pursuant to the Stock Option Exchange Program (as defined in Article 9 hereof). The preceding sentence shall also apply to shares that on or after October 25, 2000 are tendered, withheld, settled in cash or forfeited, or cancelled pursuant to the Stock Option Exchange Program (as defined in Article 9 hereof), in respect of awards granted under the 1989 Stock Incentive Plan, which are outstanding on October 25, 2000." 2. Section 6.3.2 of the Plan is amended and restated to read in its entirety as follows: "6.3.2 Shareowner Approval Required For Certain Amendments. Shareowner approval will be required for any amendment of the Plan that does any of the following: a. permits the grant of any Stock Option with an Option Exercise Price less than Fair Market Value on the date of grant; b. reduces the Option Exercise Price of an outstanding Stock Option, either by lowering the Option Exercise Price or by canceling an outstanding Stock Option and granting a replacement Stock Option with a lower Option Exercise Price; or c. extends the Regular Expiration Date for exercise of any Stock Option; provided, however, that shareowner approval shall not be required for the Stock Option Exchange Program (as defined in Article 9 hereof)." 3. The Plan is amended to add the following Article 9 which reads in its entirety as follows: "ARTICLE 9. STOCK OPTION EXCHANGE PROGRAM 9.1 In General. At such time as the Committee determines advisable, Delta will be permitted (but not required) to offer certain Employees, who are not members of the Board of Directors of Delta and who shall otherwise be designated by the Committee in its sole discretion ("Eligible Participants"), who hold Eligible Options (as defined below), a one-time opportunity to elect to surrender all or a portion, as specified below, of their Eligible Options for cancellation ("Surrendered Options") in exchange for the grant of replacement Non-Qualified Stock Options to be granted under the Plan ("Replacement Options") on a date to be determined by the Committee that is no less than six months and one day following the cancellation of such Surrendered Options (such exchange, the "Stock Option Exchange Program"). The Stock Option Exchange Program and the Replacement Options shall have the terms and conditions set forth or provided for in this Article 9. Except to the extent otherwise determined by the Committee, the Stock Option Exchange Program will be structured so that Delta avoids incurring financial accounting charges as a result thereof. To participate in the Stock Option Exchange Program and receive a grant of Replacement Options, an Eligible Participant who surrenders for cancellation any Eligible Options (i) having a date of grant in the period beginning January 1, 2 1995 through and including December 31, 1999, must surrender all his or her Eligible Options having dates of grant in that period, (ii) having a date of grant in the period beginning January 1, 2000 through and including December 31, 2001, must surrender all his or her Eligible Options having dates of grant in that period and (iii) having a date of grant in the period beginning January 1, 2002 through and including December 31, 2002, must surrender all his or her Eligible Options having a date of grant in that period. To participate in the Stock Option Exchange Program and receive any grant of Replacement Options, an Employee must be an Eligible Participant on each of the following dates: (i) the date the Stock Option Exchange Program commences, (ii) the date the period during which Surrendered Options may be surrendered for cancellation pursuant to the Stock Option Exchange Program expires and (iii) the date of grant of the Replacement Options. 9.2 Eligible Options. For purposes of the Stock Option Exchange Program, the term "Eligible Option" shall mean an outstanding Non-Qualified Stock Option granted under the Plan or a non-qualified stock option granted under Delta's 1989 Stock Incentive Plan on or after January 1, 1995 that has, in either case, an Option Exercise Price or an exercise price, as the case may be, equal to or in excess of $25.00 per share. 9.3 Exchange Ratio. The number of Replacement Options that will be granted in exchange for Surrendered Options to Eligible Participants who are not named executive officers of Delta designated in the Summary Compensation Table of Delta's 2003 Proxy Statement ("NEOs") shall be determined in accordance with the following table, which sets forth the number of Surrendered Options that must be exchanged for a Replacement Option, based on the grant date of the Surrendered Option, subject to any adjustments for transactions or events as specified in Sections 4.3 or 4.4 of the Plan:

The number of Replacement Options that will be granted in exchange for Surrendered Options to Eligible Participants who are NEOs shall be equal to 90% of the number of Replacement Options they would otherwise receive by application of the applicable exchange ratio set forth in the table above. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the number of Replacement Options as determined in accordance with the foregoing is a fractional number, such fractional number will be rounded up to the nearest whole number for the purpose of determining the number of such Replacement Options. 3 Subject to the second paragraph of this Section 9.3, determining the number of Replacement Options to be granted in exchange for Surrendered Options, the applicable exchange ratio set forth in the table above shall be applied separately to Surrendered Options having the same date of grant and the resulting number of Replacement Options shall then be rounded in accordance with the foregoing. 9.4 Terms of Replacement Options. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan, Replacement Options shall have the following terms: 9.4.1. Exercise Price. The price at which a share of Stock covered by a Replacement Option may be purchased shall be the closing price of the Stock on the New York Stock Exchange on the date of grant, if the date is a trading day, and, if not, on the previous trading day. 9.4.2. Option Exercise Period and Term. Except as provided in the following sentence with respect to surrendered Options originally granted in 1995 and in rules or conditions applicable to the Stock Option Exchange Program and Replacement Options prescribed or established by the Committee, Replacement Options granted to an Eligible Participant who is not an NEO shall become exercisable with respect to 50% of such Replacement Options, rounded up to the nearest number of whole shares, on the first anniversary of the date of grant and with respect to all remaining Replacement Options on the second anniversary of the date of grant. All Replacement Options granted to an Eligible Participant who is not an NEO in exchange for Surrendered Options originally granted in 1995 shall become exercisable on the first anniversary of the date of grant. Replacement Options granted to NEOs shall become exercisable with respect to 25% of such Replacement Options on each of the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant, in each case rounded up to the nearest number of whole shares, and with respect to all remaining Replacement Options on the fourth anniversary of the date of grant. Subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan and rules prescribed by the Committee applicable to the Replacement Options, each Replacement Option, once it becomes exercisable, will be exercisable through and including the remaining term of the Surrendered Options in exchange for which it is granted and for an additional period of time beyond such remaining term equal to the period of time from the date of cancellation of such Surrendered Options through and including the date of grant of such Replacement Options. Following the period for which a Replacement Option is exercisable, such Replacement Option shall expire and no shares of Delta Common Stock may be purchased. 9.4.3 Other Terms and Conditions. Shares of Delta Common Stock acquired by NEOs upon exercise of their Replacement Options may not be sold for one year following such acquisition, except that this restriction shall not apply to such shares of Delta Common Stock sold in connection with the payment 4 of the Option Exercise Price or minimum required tax withholding obligations in accordance with the terms of the Plan or sold to pay related brokerage commissions. In addition, this restriction shall terminate and be of no further force or effect upon a Change in Control and, with respect to replacement options held by an NEO, upon such NEO's death, Retirement at age 62 or later or termination in the case of Disability. All of the terms and conditions of the Replacement Options not set forth herein will be determined by the Committee in accordance with the provisions hereof. 9.4.4. Non-Qualified Options. All Replacement Options shall be deemed "non-qualified" for purposes of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any successor thereto. 9.5 Administration. In addition to the authority of the Committee set forth in Section 3.2 of the Plan, which authority the Committee shall have with respect to the Stock Option Exchange Program and the Replacement Options, the Committee shall have full discretionary authority to establish rules, terms and conditions for the commencement, continuation and/or consummation of the Stock Option Exchange Program, to determine the extent to which the Stock Option Exchange Program will result in Delta incurring financial accounting charges and to adopt such further rules, terms and conditions relating to the Stock Option Exchange Program and the Replacement Options that are consistent with the provisions set forth in this Article 9, including, without limitation, provisions specifying and/or limiting the Eligible Participants. The Committee will have total and exclusive responsibility to control, operate, manage and administer the Stock Option Exchange Program in accordance with its terms and conditions and all the authority that may be necessary or helpful to enable it to discharge its responsibilities with respect to the Stock Option Exchange Program. Without limiting the generality of the preceding sentences, the Committee will have the exclusive right to interpret the Stock Option Exchange Program, decide all questions concerning eligibility for and the terms of the exchange pursuant to the Stock Option Exchange Program, construe any ambiguous provision of the Stock Option Exchange Program, correct any default, supply any omission, reconcile any inconsistency, and decide all questions arising in the administration, interpretation and application of the Stock Option Exchange Program. The Committee will have full discretionary authority in all matters related to the discharge of its responsibilities and the exercise of its authority under the Program, including, without limitation, its construction of the terms of the Stock Option Exchange Program. It is the intent of the Stock Option Exchange Program that the decisions of the Committee and its actions with respect to the Stock Option Exchange Program will be final and binding upon all persons having or claiming to have any right or interest in or under the Stock Option Exchange Program. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, the Committee shall have the right in its sole discretion to provide for such modifications and additional 5 terms and conditions ("special terms") to the Stock Option Exchange Program as the Committee may consider necessary or appropriate to accommodate differences in local law, policy or custom, or to facilitate administration of the Stock Option Exchange Program. The Committee may adopt or approve sub-plans, appendices or supplements to, or amendments, restatements, or alternative versions of, the Stock Option Exchange Program as it may consider necessary or appropriate for purposes of implementing any special terms, without thereby affecting the terms of the Stock Option Exchange Program." 4. This Amendment does not supersede the terms and conditions of the Plan, except to the extent expressly described herein, and the Plan, as amended hereby, shall remain in full force and effect as so amended. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in the Plan and this Amendment to the "Plan" shall be deemed to be references to the Plan as amended herein. 6 EX-10.4 6 g85759exv10w4.txt EXHIBIT 10.4 EXHIBIT 10.4 SUMMARY OF ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT, DATED AS OF JULY 1, 2003, BETWEEN DELTA AIR LINES, INC. AND CERTAIN EXECUTIVE OFFICERS In 2002, we restructured our officer life insurance program by replacing the existing group policy with individual policies under a split dollar program that were owned by the covered executives. This change enabled us to reduce the total cost of the officer life insurance program. As with the previous program, we paid all premiums for the insurance policies, which were treated as interest free loans to the executives. Each executive then assigned a portion of the value of his or her policy to Delta to cover repayment of the loans made to pay premiums. Delta filed the documents pertaining to this matter, including a form Loan Agreement and Collateral Assignment Agreement, with the SEC in its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002. Because the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which was enacted following the initial restructuring of the program, prohibits such loans to executive officers, it is necessary for us to restructure this program to eliminate the loans for payment of policy premiums and to provide for repayment of the existing loans. To effect this restructuring, each executive officer transferred his or her policy to us by means of the Assignment Agreement, a form of which is this Exhibit 10.4. This transfer from the executive to us of the cash value of the policy repaid the loan that paid the initial premium on the policy. We now own the policies and all cash value in the policies belongs to us, rather than to the officer, and consistent with the intent of the program, the officer retains the right to name the beneficiary of the policy. ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT dated as of July 1, 2003 by and between Delta Air Lines, Inc. (the "COMPANY") and ("EXECUTIVE"). WHEREAS, Executive's life is insured under, and Executive is the owner of, life insurance policy number (the "POLICY") issued by Lincoln National Life Insurance Company (the "INSURER"); WHEREAS, pursuant to the terms of the Executive Life Insurance Plan Loan Agreement between the Company and Executive dated July 1, 2002 (the "LOAN AGREEMENT"), the Company agreed to loan Executive sufficient amounts to pay the premiums on the Policy; WHEREAS, pursuant to the Collateral Assignment Agreement dated July 1, 2002 executed by Executive (the "COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT"), Executive assigned an interest in the Policy to the Company as collateral security for the premium payments on the Policy; WHEREAS, Executive now wishes to assign to the Company all of Executive's rights, title and interest in the Policy as repayment for the amounts borrowed by Executive under the Loan Agreement; WHEREAS, the Company wishes to accept Executive's assignment of the Policy in full satisfaction of the amounts loaned to Executive pursuant to the Loan Agreement; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing and the mutual agreements contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. Assignment. Executive hereby assigns all of his rights, title and interest in the Policy to the Company and the Company hereby accepts such assignment. Upon the execution and delivery of this Assignment Agreement (and any other written instrument as may be reasonably requested by the Insurer in order to give effect to this assignment) by the Company and Executive, the Company shall, as of the date hereof, acquire the Policy and succeed to the rights, title and interest of Executive thereunder. Section 2. Repayment. The Company hereby accepts the assignment contemplated by Section 1 hereof in full satisfaction of Executive's obligations under the Loan Agreement and the Collateral Assignment Agreement and such agreements are hereby canceled. Section 3. Governing Law. Except to the extent preempted by federal law, this Assignment Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Georgia. Section 4. Successors. This Assignment Agreement shall be binding upon Executive's personal and legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees, legatees and assigns. Section 5. Counterparts. This Assignment Agreement may be signed in counterpart, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this Assignment Agreement.

EX-10.5 7 g85759exv10w5.txt EXHIBIT 10.5 EXHIBIT 10.5 SUMMARY OF WAIVER ("WAIVER") DATED AS OF JULY 24, 2003 EXECUTED BY EACH OF MR. MULLIN AND MR. REID AS A RESULT OF DELTA'S CONTRACT WITH THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DATED MAY 6, 2003 (THE "GOVERNMENT CONTRACT") PURSUANT TO THE EMERGENCY WARTIME SUPPLEMENTAL APPROPRIATIONS ACT OF 2003 (THE "APPROPRIATIONS ACT") Pursuant to the Appropriations Act, we entered into the Government Contract, which was filed with our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2003. Under the Government Contract, we agreed to limit the Total Cash Compensation of our Executive Officers (each as defined in the Government Contract) for the 12-month period beginning April 1, 2003. We subsequently entered into the Waiver with each of Mr. Mullin and Mr. Reid. Under the Waiver, Mr. Mullin and Mr. Reid agreed to waive their right to any compensation that would cause us to violate the Government Contract. As consideration for these agreements, we waived our right, in certain circumstances, to reduce the amount of the performance-based restricted stock award that is payable to them in 2004. WAIVER Waiver (this "WAIVER") dated as of July 24, 2003 by and between Delta Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "COMPANY"), and ("EXECUTIVE"). WHEREAS, pursuant to the Emergency Wartime Supplemental Appropriations Act of 2003, the Company entered into an agreement with the United States of America dated May 6, 2003 (the "GOVERNMENT CONTRACT"); WHEREAS, pursuant to Paragraph 4.1 of the Government Contract, the Company has agreed to limit the "Total Cash Compensation" of its "Executive Officers" (each as defined in the Government Contract) for a 12-month period beginning April 1, 2003; and WHEREAS, the Company and Executive have determined that it is in the best interest of the Company and Executive for Executive to waive certain compensation to which Executive may be otherwise entitled to the extent necessary for the Company to comply with Paragraph 4.1 of the Government Contract; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing, the agreements set forth below and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto, intending to be legally bound, agree as follows: Section 1. Waiver of Certain Compensation in Connection With the Government Contract. Notwithstanding anything in any agreement, understanding, plan or program to the contrary, in the event the Personnel & Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company (the "COMPENSATION COMMITTEE") shall determine in its reasonable discretion that making any payment or providing any benefit to which Executive may be otherwise entitled under any agreement or understanding with the Company or pursuant to any plan or program of the Company (a "PAYMENT") would cause the Company to violate its agreement under Paragraph 4.1 of the Government Contract, Executive hereby agrees that he shall not be entitled to such payment and/or benefit and, instead, the Compensation Committee shall reduce such payment(s) and/or benefit(s) by an amount, determined by the Compensation Committee in its reasonable discretion, such that the Company shall not be in such violation. Further, Executive hereby agrees that in the event the Compensation Committee determines in its reasonable discretion that any payment to Executive (including any reimbursement of expenses) would cause the Company to violate Paragraph 4.1 of the Government Contract (such payment, an "Excess Payment"), upon notification from the Compensation Committee, Executive shall promptly repay such Excess Payment to the Company. In addition, Executive hereby agrees that the Company shall have the right (a) to set- 2 off any Excess Amount against any obligation to make a payment or honor a commitment to Executive and (b) to postpone any Payment for a reasonable period of time to enable the Compensation Committee to determine whether such Payment would constitute an Excess Payment. Section 2. Waiver of Company's Negative Discretion in Connection with Long-Term Performance Award. In consideration for Executive's waiver of certain rights and privileges as set forth herein, provided that Executive's employment with the Company continues through December 31, 2003, the Company hereby waives the Compensation Committee's right pursuant to Section 6 of Executive's Performance-Based Restricted Stock Agreement dated January 25, 2001 (the "PERFORMANCE AGREEMENT") to reduce the amount of Executive's performance award payable in calendar year 2004 thereunder. Section 3. Effectiveness. This Waiver shall be effective as of the date first above written. Section 4. Effect of Waiver. Except as waived hereby, all of the provisions of any affected agreement, plan or program, including the Performance Plan, shall remain in full force and effect without modification or waiver. Section 5. Entire Agreement. This Waiver constitutes the entire agreement between the Company and Executive with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersedes any other prior agreement, written or oral, between the parties with respect thereto. This Waiver may only be amended by written instrument signed by both the Company and Executive. Section 6. Governing Law. This Waiver shall be governed by and construed in accordance with laws of the State of Georgia without reference to principles of conflict of laws. Section 7. Successors. This Waiver shall be binding upon Executive's personal and legal representatives, executors, administrators, successors, heirs, distributees, devisees and legatees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Company and Executive have executed this Waiver.

3 EX-12 8 g85759exv12.txt EXHIBIT 12 . . . EXHIBIT 12 DELTA AIR LINES, INC. STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS (LOSS) TO FIXED CHARGES (IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)

(1) Fixed charges exceeded our adjusted earnings (loss) by $257 million and $660 million for three and nine months ended September 30, 2003, respectively, and by $501 million and $1.4 billion for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, respectively. EX-15 9 g85759exv15.txt EXHIBIT 15 EXHIBIT 15 November 12, 2003 Delta Air Lines, Inc. Atlanta, Georgia We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial information of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and subsidiaries for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2003 and 2002, as indicated in our report dated November 12, 2003; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion on that information. We are aware that our report referred to above, which was included in your Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2003, is incorporated by reference in Registration Statements No. 2-94541, 333-65218 and 333-108176 on Form S-3; Registration Statement No. 333-106952 on Form S-4; and Registration Statements No. 33-65391, 333-16471, 333-92291, 333-46904, 333-48718, 33-30454, 333-49553 and 333-73856 on Form S-8. We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act. /s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP Atlanta, Georgia EX-31.1 10 g85759exv31w1.txt EXHIBIT 31.1 EXHIBIT 31.1 I, Leo F. Mullin, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Delta as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Delta's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Delta and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Delta, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of Delta's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in Delta's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Delta's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Delta's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. Delta's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Delta's auditors and the Audit Committee of Delta's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Delta's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Delta's internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 14, 2003 /s/ Leo F. Mullin -------------------------------------- Leo F. Mullin Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer EX-31.2 11 g85759exv31w2.txt EXHIBIT 31.2 EXHIBIT 31.2 I, M. Michele Burns, certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2003; 2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Delta as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. Delta's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for Delta and have: (a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to Delta, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; (b) Evaluated the effectiveness of Delta's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and (c) Disclosed in this report any change in Delta's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during Delta's most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, Delta's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. Delta's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to Delta's auditors and the Audit Committee of Delta's Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): (a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect Delta's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and (b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Delta's internal control over financial reporting. Date: November 14, 2003 /s/ M. Michele Burns -------------------------------------- M. Michele Burns Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer EX-32 12 g85759exv32.txt EXHIBIT 32 EXHIBIT 32 November 14, 2003 Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20549 Ladies and Gentlemen: The certifications set forth below are hereby submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to, and solely for the purpose of complying with, Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code in connection with the filing on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange Commission of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delta Air Lines, Inc. ("Delta") for the quarter ended September 30, 2003 (the "Report"). Each of the undersigned, the Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer, and the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Delta, hereby certifies that, as of the end of the period covered by the Report: 1. such Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and 2. the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of Delta. /s/: Leo F. Mullin -------------------------------------- Name: Leo F. Mullin Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer /s/: M. Michele Burns -------------------------------------- Name: M. Michele Burns Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----


		September 30, 2003					December 31, 2002

		Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Gross Carrying		Accumulated
(in millions)		Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amortization

Intangible assets subject to amortization:
	Leasehold and operating rights	$	125	$	(91	)	$	125	$	(86	)
	Other		3		(1	)		3		(1	)

	Total	$	128	$	(92	)	$	128	$	(87	)


Years Ending December 31,	Principal
(in millions)	Amount

2003	$	102
2004		1,006
2005		1,247
2006		765
2007		453
After 2007		8,869

Total	$	12,442


	% of Projected
	Aircraft Fuel
	Requirements			Average Hedge
	Hedged			Price per Gallon

December 2003 Quarter		47	%		75.84¢
Year Ending December 31, 2003		66	%		78.09¢
Year Ending December 31, 2004		29	%		74.68¢


FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements
	Statistical Summary
	Aircraft Fleet Table
	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings
	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURE
Exhibit Index
EXHIBIT 10.1
EXHIBIT 10.2
EXHIBIT 10.3
EXHIBIT 10.4
EXHIBIT 10.5
EXHIBIT 12
EXHIBIT 15
EXHIBIT 31.1
EXHIBIT 31.2
EXHIBIT 32


		Net Carrying		Net Carrying
(in millions)		Amount		Amount

Intangible assets not subject to amortization:
	International routes	$	60	$	60
	Other		1		1

	Total	$	61	$	61


Year Ending December 31,
(in billions)		Amount

2003		$	0.1
2004			0.7
2005			1.2
2006			1.3
2007			0.8

	Total	$	4.1


				Severance and Related Costs

				2002			2001
				Workforce			Workforce
	Facilities			Reduction			Reduction
(in millions)	and Other			Programs			Programs

Balance at December 31, 2002	$	65		$	71		$	3

Payments		(7	)		(41	)		(2	)
Adjustments		(9	)		—			—

Balance at September 30, 2003	$	49		$	30		$	1


		Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Registrant)



	By: /s/ M. Michele Burns
	M. Michele Burns
	Executive Vice President
	and Chief Financial Officer

November 14, 2003