10-Q

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2002

or

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

Commission File Number 1-5424

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

State of Incorporation: Delaware

IRS Employer Identification No.: 58-0218548

Hartsfield Atlanta International Airport, Atlanta, Georgia 30320

Telephone: (404) 715-2600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months, and
(2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X]    No [  ]

Number of shares outstanding by each class of common stock,
as of October 31, 2002:

Common Stock, $1.50 par value -123,354,008 shares outstanding

This document is also available on our web site at http://investor.delta.com/edgar.cfm.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
	Item 1. Financial Statements
	Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
	Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
	Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
	Item 4. Controls and Procedures
INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
	Item 1. Legal Proceedings
	Item 5. Other Information
	Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
SIGNATURE
CERTIFICATIONS
EXHIBIT INDEX
EX-10
EX-12
EX-15
EX-99

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

         Statements in this Form 10-Q (or otherwise made by Delta or on Delta’s behalf) which are not historical facts, including statements about Delta’s estimates, expectations, beliefs, intentions, projections or strategies for the future, may be “forward-looking statements” as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical experience or Delta’s present expectations. Factors that could cause these differences include, but are not limited to:

1. the many effects on Delta and the airline industry from the terrorist attacks on the United States on September 11, 2001, including the following:

• the adverse impact of the terrorist attacks on the demand for air travel;

• the change in Delta’s operations and higher costs resulting from, and customer reaction to, new airline and airport security directives, including the Aviation and Transportation Security Act;

• the availability and cost of war and terrorism risk and other insurance for Delta;

• the availability to Delta of financing on commercially reasonable terms, which may be influenced by, among other things, airline bankruptcies, the creditworthiness of the airline industry in general and Delta in particular and actions by credit rating agencies;

• potential declines in the values of the aircraft in Delta’s fleet or facilities and related asset impairment charges;

• additional terrorist activity and/or war;

2.	general economic conditions, both in the United States and in our markets outside the United States;
3.	competitive factors in our industry, such as mergers and acquisitions, airline bankruptcies, the airline pricing environment, the growth of low cost carriers, international alliances, codesharing programs and capacity decisions by competitors;
4.	outcomes of negotiations on collective bargaining agreements and other labor issues;
5.	changes in the availability or cost of aircraft fuel or fuel hedges;
6.	disruptions to operations due to adverse weather conditions and air traffic control-related constraints;

1

7.	actions by the United States or foreign governments, including the Federal Aviation Administration and other regulatory agencies;
8.	the willingness of customers to travel generally, and with Delta specifically, which could be affected by factors such as Delta’s and the industry’s safety record; and
9.	the outcome of Delta’s litigation.

         Caution should be taken not to place undue reliance on Delta’s forward-looking statements, which represent Delta’s views only as of November 13, 2002, and which Delta has no current intention to update.

2

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Millions, Except Share Data)

				September 30,		December 31,
ASSETS				2002		2001*
				(Unaudited)
CURRENT ASSETS:
	Cash and cash equivalents			$	1,657	$	2,210
	Restricted cash				97		—
	Accounts receivable, net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts of $35 at September 30, 2002 and $43 at December 31, 2001				530		368
	Income tax receivable				283		160
	Expendable parts and supplies inventories, net of an allowance for obsolescence of $145 at September 30, 2002 and $139 at December 31, 2001				158		181
	Deferred income taxes				651		518
	Fuel hedge contracts, at fair market value				94		55
	Prepaid expenses and other				374		235
			Total current assets		3,844		3,727
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT:
	Flight equipment				20,179		19,427
		Less: Accumulated depreciation			6,062		5,730
	Flight equipment, net				14,117		13,697
	Flight equipment under capital leases				382		382
		Less: Accumulated amortization			288		262
	Flight equipment under capital leases, net				94		120
	Ground property and equipment				4,622		4,412
		Less: Accumulated depreciation			2,592		2,355
	Ground property and equipment, net				2,030		2,057
	Advance payments for equipment				127		223
			Total property and equipment, net		16,368		16,097
OTHER ASSETS:
	Investments in debt and equity securities				45		96
	Investments in associated companies				180		180
	Cost in excess of net assets acquired, net				2,092		2,092
	Operating rights and other intangibles, net of accumulated amortization of $250 at September 30, 2002 and $246 at December 31, 2001				103		94
	Restricted investments for Boston airport terminal project				438		475
	Other noncurrent assets				967		1,004
			Total other assets		3,825		3,941
Total assets				$	24,037	$	23,765

*     Derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet included in Delta’s 2001 Annual Report to Shareowners.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In Millions, Except Share Data)

					September 30,			December 31,
LIABILITIES AND SHAREOWNERS' EQUITY					2002			2001*
					(Unaudited)
CURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Current maturities of long-term debt				$	790		$	260
	Short-term obligations					188			765
	Current obligations under capital leases					24			31
	Accounts payable and other accrued liabilities					1,740			1,617
	Air traffic liability					1,544			1,224
	Taxes payable					879			1,049
	Accrued salaries and related benefits					1,182			1,121
	Accrued rent					239			336
		Total current liabilities				6,586			6,403
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES:
	Long-term debt					8,665			7,781
	Long-term debt issued by Massachusetts Port Authority					498			498
	Capital leases					51			68
	Postretirement benefits					2,292			2,292
	Accrued rent					791			781
	Deferred income taxes					827			625
	Other					500			464
			Total noncurrent liabilities			13,624			12,509
DEFERRED CREDITS:
	Deferred gains on sale and leaseback transactions					490			519
	Manufacturers’ and other credits					242			310
		Total deferred credits				732			829
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Notes 3, 8, 9 and 16)
EMPLOYEE STOCK OWNERSHIP PLAN PREFERRED STOCK:
	Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock, $1.00 par value, $72.00 stated and liquidation value; 6,097,688 shares issued and outstanding at September 30, 2002, and 6,278,210 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2001					439			452
	Unearned compensation under employee stock ownership plan					(189	)		(197	)
			Total Employee Stock Ownership Plan Preferred Stock			250			255
SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY:
	Common stock, $1.50 par value; 450,000,000 shares authorized; 180,896,343 shares issued at September 30, 2002 and 180,890,356 shares issued at December 31, 2001					271			271
	Additional paid-in capital					3,258			3,267
	Retained earnings					2,002			2,930
	Accumulated other comprehensive income					32			25
	Treasury stock at cost, 57,551,427 shares at September 30, 2002 and 57,644,690 shares at December 31, 2001					(2,718	)		(2,724	)
				Total shareowners’ equity		2,845			3,769
Total liabilities and shareowners’ equity					$	24,037		$	23,765

* Derived from the audited Consolidated Balance Sheet included in Delta’s 2001 Annual Report to Shareowners.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
(In Millions, Except Share Data)

			Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
			September 30,						September 30,
			2002			2001*			2002			2001*
OPERATING REVENUES:
	Passenger		$	3,165		$	3,190		$	9,260		$	10,325
	Cargo			112			116			332			387
	Other, net			143			92			405			304
		Total operating revenues		3,420			3,398			9,997			11,016
OPERATING REVENUES:
	Salaries and related costs			1,555			1,534			4,619			4,701
	Aircraft fuel			468			472			1,208			1,449
	Depreciation and amortization			289			318			861			973
	Contracted services			256			248			760			758
	Landing fees and other rents			213			198			627			588
	Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs			182			216			548			596
	Aircraft rent			175			183			532			557
	Other selling expenses			141			152			426			496
	Passenger commissions			72			137			268			422
	Passenger service			95			124			287			365
	Asset writedowns and other nonrecurring items			225			68			288			128
	Stabilization Act compensation			(34	)		(171	)		(34	)		(171	)
	Other			168			170			554			634
		Total operating expenses		3,805			3,649			10,944			11,496
OPERATING LOSS				(385	)		(251	)		(947	)		(480	)
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE):
	Interest expense			(165	)		(126	)		(481	)		(354	)
	Interest income			9			21			29			72
	Gain (loss) from sale of investments			—			12			(3	)		19
	Fair value adjustments of SFAS 133 derivatives			10			(51	)		(33	)		44
	Miscellaneous income (expense), net			4			(13	)		19			(30	)
		Total other income (expense)		(142	)		(157	)		(469	)		(249	)
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAX BENEFIT				(527	)		(408	)		(1,416	)		(729	)
INCOME TAX BENEFIT				201			149			507			247
NET LOSS				(326	)		(259	)		(909	)		(482	)
PREFERRED STOCK DIVIDENDS				(4	)		(3	)		(11	)		(10	)
NET LOSS AVAILABLE TO COMMON SHAREOWNERS			$	(330	)	$	(262	)	$	(920	)	$	(492	)
BASIC AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE			$	(2.67	)	$	(2.13	)	$	(7.46	)	$	(4.00	)
WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES USED IN BASIC AND DILUTED PER SHARE COMPUTATION				123,285,610			123,144,899			123,257,925			123,076,651
DIVIDENDS PER COMMON SHARE			$	0.025		$	0.025		$	0.075		$	0.075

* Derived from the Consolidated Statement of Operations previously included in Delta’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
(In Millions)

			Nine Months Ended
			September 30,
			2002			2001*
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
	Net loss		$	(909	)	$	(482	)
	Adjustments to reconcile net loss to cash provided by operating activities, net			556			630
	Changes in certain assets and liabilities, net			431			456
		Net cash provided by operating activities		78			604
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
	Property and equipment additions:
		Flight equipment, including advance payments		(855	)		(1,749	)
		Ground property and equipment		(243	)		(411	)
	(Increase) decrease in restricted investments related to Boston airport terminal project			37			(485	)
	Decrease in short-term investments, net			5			239
	Proceeds from sale of investments			24			148
	Proceeds from sale of flight equipment			46			64
	Other, net			(11	)		19
		Net cash used in investing activities		(997	)		(2,175	)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
	Payments on long-term debt and capital lease obligations			(418	)		(148	)
	Issuance of long-term obligations			1,598			1,431
	Issuance of long-term debt by Massachusetts Port Authority			—			498
	(Payments on) proceeds from short-term obligations and notes payable, net			(780	)		1,248
	Cash dividends on common and preferred stock			(22	)		(23	)
	Redemption of preferred stock			(13	)		(6	)
	Other, net			1			(7	)
		Net cash provided by financing activities		366			2,993
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS:				(553	)		1,422
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period				2,210			1,364
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period			$	1,657		$	2,786
SUPPLEMENTAL CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
Cash paid (received) during the period for:
	Interest (net of amounts capitalized)		$	382		$	311
	Income taxes		$	(515	)	$	(94	)
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:
Aircraft delivered under seller financing			$	393		$	55

* Derived from the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows previously included in Delta’s Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2001.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

6

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Statistical Summary
(Unaudited)

		Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
		September 30,						September 30,
Statistical Summary:		2002			2001			2002			2001
	Revenue Passenger Miles (millions)		27,364			26,881			76,913			79,994
	Available Seat Miles (millions)		36,840			37,730			106,439			113,695
	Passenger Mile Yield		11.57¢			11.87¢			12.04¢			12.91¢
	Operating Revenue Per Available Seat Mile		9.28¢			9.00¢			9.39¢			9.69¢
	Passenger Revenue Per Available Seat Mile		8.59¢			8.46¢			8.70¢			9.08¢
	Operating Cost Per Available Seat Mile		10.33¢			9.67¢			10.28¢			10.11¢
	Operating Cost Per Available Seat Mile — Excluding (1)		9.81¢			9.94¢			10.04¢			10.15¢
	Passenger Load Factor		74.28	%		71.25	%		72.26	%		70.36	%
	Breakeven Passenger Load Factor		83.29	%		76.86	%		79.65	%		73.63	%
	Breakeven Passenger Load Factor — Excluding (1)		78.80	%		79.16	%		77.66	%		73.92	%
	Passengers Enplaned (thousands)		27,713			26,441			79,758			81,503
	Revenue Ton Miles (millions)		3,098			3,065			8,789			9,218
	Cargo Ton Miles (millions)		362			377			1,098			1,221
	Cargo Ton Mile Yield		31.01¢			30.85¢			30.28¢			31.72¢
	Fuel Gallons Consumed (millions)		656			678			1,889			2,056
	Average Price Per Fuel Gallon, net of hedging gains		71.33¢			69.63¢			63.93¢			70.49¢
	Number of Aircraft in Fleet, End of Period		822			828			822			828
	Full-Time Equivalent Employees, End of Period		76,000			83,000			76,000			83,000

(1) Calculation excludes unusual items for the applicable periods as discussed in “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in this Form 10-Q.

7

DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

September 30, 2002
(Unaudited)

1. ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

         The accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP) for interim financial information, the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, this Form 10-Q does not include all of the information required by GAAP for complete financial statements. As a result, this Form 10-Q should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes in our 2001 Annual Report to Shareowners (Annual Report).

         Management believes that the accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring items, asset writedowns and other nonrecurring items (as discussed in the Unusual Items section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q), considered necessary for a fair statement of results for the interim periods presented. We have reclassified certain prior period amounts in our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements to be consistent with our current period presentation.

         Due to seasonal variations in the demand for air travel and other factors, including the continued negative impact of the effects of the September 11 terrorist attacks on our business, operating results for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the entire year.

Restricted Assets

         As of September 30, 2002, we had $97 million in restricted cash included in current assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. This amount primarily relates to cash held as collateral to support projected workers’ compensation insurance obligations.

         As of September 30, 2002, we had $438 million in restricted investments included in other assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets. This amount is restricted for the redevelopment and expansion of Terminal A at Boston’s Logan International Airport. For additional information about this project, see Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 38-41) in our Annual Report.

8

2. NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (SFAS 142)

         Effective January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS 142, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangible assets. Goodwill is presented as cost in excess of net assets acquired on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

         Prior to January 1, 2002, goodwill and other intangible assets were amortized over their estimated useful lives (not to exceed 40 years in the case of goodwill). SFAS 142 requires that we discontinue the amortization of goodwill and other intangible assets with indefinite useful lives. Instead, in accordance with SFAS 142, we apply a fair value-based impairment test to the net book value of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets on an annual basis and on an interim basis if certain events or circumstances indicate that an impairment loss may have been incurred. Intangible assets that have determinable useful lives will continue to be amortized on a straight-line basis over their remaining estimated useful lives.

         SFAS 142 requires a two step process in evaluating goodwill for impairment. The first step requires the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value. We have identified three reporting units which have assigned goodwill: Delta-mainline; Comair, Inc. (Comair); and Atlantic Southeast Airlines, Inc. (ASA). Our methodology for estimating the fair value of each reporting unit primarily considers discounted future cash flows. If the fair value of a reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, then no further testing is required. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, however, a second step is required to determine the amount of the impairment charge, if any. An impairment charge is recognized if the carrying value of a reporting unit’s goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

         We perform our impairment test for our indefinite-lived intangible assets by comparing the fair value of each indefinite-lived intangible asset unit to its carrying value. The fair value of the asset unit is estimated in a similar manner as discussed above for goodwill. We recognize an impairment charge if the carrying value of the asset unit exceeds its estimated fair value.

9

         For the twelve months ending December 31, 2002, we expect the adoption of SFAS 142 to decrease operating expenses by approximately $60 million, net of tax, due to the discontinuance of amortization of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The following table reconciles our reported net loss and loss per share to adjusted net loss and loss per share as if the non-amortization provisions of SFAS 142 had been applied to prior year periods:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
(in millions, except per share data)
Net loss	$	(326	)	$	(259	)	$	(909	)	$	(482	)
Add back: goodwill and international route amortization, net of tax		—			15			—			45
Adjusted net loss	$	(326	)	$	(244	)	$	(909	)	$	(437	)
Basic and diluted loss per share:
Net loss	$	(2.67	)	$	(2.13	)	$	(7.46	)	$	(4.00	)
Add back: goodwill and international route amortization, net of tax		—			0.12			—			0.37
Adjusted net loss	$	(2.67	)	$	(2.01	)	$	(7.46	)	$	(3.63	)

         During the March 2002 quarter, we completed our initial test of potential impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill; that test indicated no impairment at the date of adoption of SFAS 142. Because our leasehold and operating rights have definite useful lives, we will continue to amortize those assets over their respective lease terms which range from nine to 19 years. The following table presents information about our intangible assets, other than goodwill, at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001:

		September 30,					December 31,
		2002					2001
		Gross Carrying		Accumulated			Gross Carrying		Accumulated
(in millions)		Amount		Amortization			Amount		Amortization
Amortized intangible assets:
	Leasehold and operating rights	$	125	$	(85	)	$	113	$	(81	)
	Other		3		(1	)		2		(1	)
	Total	$	128	$	(86	)	$	115	$	(82	)

		Net Carrying		Net Carrying
		Amount		Amount
Unamortized intangible assets:
	International routes	$	60	$	60
	Other		1		1
	Total	$	61	$	61

10

         During the June 2002 quarter, we completed our transitional goodwill impairment test, which indicated no impairment at the date of adoption of SFAS 142. We will perform the required annual impairment test of our goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets during the December 2002 quarter.

SFAS No. 145, “Rescission of FASB Statements No. 4, 44 and 64, Amendment of FASB Statement No. 13 and Technical Corrections” (SFAS 145)

         In April 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued SFAS 145, which, among other things, (1) requires that gains and losses due to the extinguishment of debt be classified as extraordinary items on the Consolidated Statements of Operations only if certain criteria are met and (2) amends the accounting for sale-leaseback transactions. SFAS 145 is effective for fiscal years beginning after May 15, 2002 and for financial statements issued on or after May 15, 2002; however, earlier adoption is encouraged. We believe the adoption of SFAS 145 will not have a material impact on our Consolidated Financial Statements.

SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities” (SFAS 146)

         In June 2002, the FASB issued SFAS 146, which nullifies previous accounting and reporting standards for costs associated with exit or disposal activities by requiring the related liability to be recognized and measured initially at fair value when the liability is incurred. Under the previous guidance, the liability for exit or disposal costs was recognized at the date management committed to an exit plan. As a result, the adoption of SFAS 146 will impact the timing of the recognition of the liabilities related to future exit or disposal activities. SFAS 146 is effective for exit or disposal activities that are initiated after December 31, 2002; however, earlier adoption is encouraged.

3. SALE OF RECEIVABLES

         We are a party to an agreement, as amended during the June 2002 quarter, under which we sold a defined pool of our accounts receivable, on a revolving basis, through a special-purpose, wholly owned subsidiary to a third party. In exchange for the sale of receivables, we received cash and a subordinated promissory note. The principal amount of the promissory note was $196 million at September 30, 2002, and is included in accounts receivable on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.

         As part of this agreement, the subsidiary is required to pay fees to a third party based on the amounts invested by the third party. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, these fees were $1 million and $3 million, respectively. These fees are included in other income (expense) under miscellaneous income (expense), net in our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

         This agreement expires on March 31, 2003. However, the third party may terminate this agreement and require us to repurchase any outstanding receivables if our senior unsecured long-term debt is rated either below Ba3 by Moody’s or below BB- by Standard & Poor’s. If the agreement had been terminated in these circumstances at September 30, 2002, we would have been required to repurchase outstanding receivables for $176 million. At September 30, 2002, our senior

11

unsecured long-term debt was rated Ba3 by Moody’s and BB- by Standard & Poor’s. Both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s ratings outlooks for our long-term debt are negative.

         For additional information regarding our sale of receivables, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 10-11) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002 and Note 18 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 52) in our Annual Report.

4. MARKETABLE AND OTHER EQUITY SECURITIES

priceline.com Incorporated (priceline)

         At September 30, 2002, our equity interest in priceline consisted of (1) 13,469 shares of Series B Redeemable Preferred Stock (Series B Preferred Stock); (2) a warrant to purchase up to 4.5 million shares of priceline common stock for $2.97 per share (2001 Warrant); (3) a warrant to purchase up to 4.7 million shares of priceline common stock for $4.72 per share (Amended 1999 Warrant); and (4) 2.1 million shares of priceline common stock. Our shares of priceline common stock include 241,441 shares received during the September 2002 quarter as a dividend on our Series B Preferred Stock. We recorded other income of approximately $490,000 in our Consolidated Statements of Operations related to this dividend.

         At September 30, 2002, the carrying values of our holdings in Series B Preferred Stock and priceline common stock were $14 million and $3 million, respectively. The Series B Preferred Stock and priceline common stock are accounted for as available-for-sale securities. In accordance with SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (SFAS 115), the Series B Preferred Stock and the priceline common stock are recorded at fair market value in investments in debt and equity securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and any change in fair market value is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income. The Series B Preferred Stock is recorded at face value, which we believe approximates fair market value. At September 30, 2002, the carrying value of the 2001 Warrant and the Amended 1999 Warrant totaled $2 million. The warrants are recorded at fair market value in investments in debt and equity securities on our Consolidated Balance Sheets and any changes in fair market value are recorded in other income (expense) on our Consolidated Statements of Operations in accordance with SFAS No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” (SFAS 133).

         For additional information regarding the Series B Preferred Stock, the 2001 Warrant, the Amended 1999 Warrant and our priceline common stock, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 11-12) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2002 and Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 33-35) in our Annual Report.

Republic Airways Holdings Inc. (Republic)

         At September 30, 2002, our equity interest in Republic consisted of (1) a warrant to purchase up to 1.5 million shares of Republic’s common stock for $12.50 per share (2002 Warrant); (2) a warrant to purchase up to 1.5 million shares of Republic’s common stock at a price per share equal

12

to 95% of the public offering price per share in Republic’s initial public offering of common stock (IPO Warrant); and (3) the right to purchase up to 5% of the shares of common stock that Republic offers for sale in its initial public offering at a price per share equal to the initial public offering price. We received these equity interests in the June 2002 quarter in conjunction with a contract carrier agreement we entered into with Chautauqua Airlines, Inc. (Chautauqua), a regional air carrier which is a subsidiary of Republic. During the September 2002 quarter, there were no changes in our equity interest in Republic.

         The carrying value of the 2002 Warrant at September 30, 2002 was $11 million. The 2002 Warrant is accounted for in the same manner as the priceline warrants described above.

         For additional information regarding our equity interest in Republic, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 11-12) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. For additional information regarding SFAS 133 and the Chautauqua contract carrier agreement, see Notes 6 and 8, respectively, of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

5. INVESTMENTS IN ASSOCIATED COMPANIES

         During the September 2002 quarter, we received a $40 million cash dividend related to our investment in WORLDSPAN, L.P. (Worldspan). Because we account for this investment under the equity method, this dividend did not impact our Consolidated Statements of Operations.

6. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

         In accordance with SFAS 133, we record all derivative instruments on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair market value and recognize certain non-cash changes in these fair market values in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. SFAS 133 applies to the accounting for our fuel hedging program, our interest rate hedging program and our holdings of equity warrants and other similar rights in certain companies. The impact of SFAS 133 on our Consolidated Statements of Operations is summarized as follows:

	Income (Expense)
	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
(in millions)	2002			2001			2002			2001
Change in time value of fuel hedge contracts	$	(1	)	$	(5	)	$	(27	)	$	(12	)
Ineffective portion of fuel hedge contracts		19			8			24			4
Fair value adjustment of equity rights		(8	)		(54	)		(30	)		52
Fair value adjustments of SFAS 133 derivatives, pretax	$	10		$	(51	)	$	(33	)	$	44
Total, net of tax	$	6		$	(31	)	$	(21	)	$	27

13

Fuel Hedging Program

         At September 30, 2002, our fuel hedge contracts had an estimated short-term fair market value of $94 million and an estimated long-term fair market value of $2 million. Unrealized gains of $38 million, net of tax, were recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2002. For additional information regarding SFAS 133 and our fuel hedging policy, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 35-36) in our Annual Report.

Interest Rate Hedging Program

         To more effectively manage our interest rate exposure, on July 18, 2002, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements relating to our (1) $300 million principal amount of unsecured Series C Medium Term Notes due March 15, 2004, which pay interest at a fixed rate of 6.65% per year and (2) $500 million principal amount of unsecured Notes due December 15, 2005, which pay interest at a fixed rate of 7.70% per year.

         Under the first interest rate swap agreement, we are paying the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus a margin per year and receiving 6.65% per year on a notional amount of $300 million until March 15, 2004. Under the second agreement, we are paying LIBOR plus a margin per year and receiving 7.70% per year on a notional amount of $500 million until December 15, 2005. Each of these transactions qualifies for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 and will be accounted for as fair value hedges. We do not enter into interest rate hedge agreements for speculative purposes.

         At September 30, 2002, our interest rate swap agreements had an estimated long-term fair market value of $18 million. The gains and losses related to these agreements are recorded in interest expense in our Consolidated Statements of Operations. For additional information regarding SFAS 133, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 35-36) in our Annual Report.

Equity Warrants and Other Similar Rights

         We own equity warrants and other similar rights in certain companies, primarily Republic and priceline. At September 30, 2002, the total fair market value of these rights was $14 million. The changes in fair market value of these rights are recorded on our Consolidated Statements of Operations as fair value adjustments of SFAS 133 derivatives. For additional information regarding these equity interests, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 33-35) in our Annual Report and Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

14

7. AIRCRAFT FLEET

         Our total aircraft fleet, orders, options and rolling options at September 30, 2002 are summarized in the following table. Options have scheduled delivery slots. Rolling options replace options and are assigned delivery slots as options expire or are exercised.

	Current Fleet
											Rolling
Aircraft Type	Owned		Leased		Total		Orders		Options		Options
B-727-200		23		4		27		—		—		—
B-737-200		—		52		52		—		—		—
B-737-300		—		17		17		—		—		—
B-737-800		69		—		69		61		60		258
B-757-200		80		41		121		—		20		49
B-767-200		15		—		15		—		—		—
B-767-300/300ER		55		32		87		—		10		10
B-767-400		21		—		21		—		24		4
B-777-200		8		—		8		5		20		15
MD-11		8		7		15		—		—		—
MD-88		63		57		120		—		—		—
MD-90		16		—		16		—		—		—
EMB-120		39		—		39		—		—		—
ATR-72		4		15		19		—		—		—
CRJ-100/200		68		122		190		36		205		—
CRJ-700		6		—		6		52		165		—
Total		475		347		822		154		504		336

         The table above reflects the following changes which occurred during the September 2002 quarter:

• We accepted delivery of five CRJ-200 and three CRJ-700 aircraft.

• We retired five B-727-200 aircraft.

• We grounded two B-727-200 and four B-737-300 aircraft prior to their lease expirations. We will return these aircraft to their lessors when their respective lease terms expire.

• We returned six EMB-120 aircraft to the lessor due to the expiration of the leases.

• We sold and leased back four B-737-200 and three B-737-300 aircraft.

         The above table includes the following 20 aircraft, which we temporarily grounded as a result of capacity reductions implemented after the September 11 terrorist attacks: 16 B-737-200, three B-767-200 and one B-767-400 aircraft.

15

8. COMMITMENTS AND LEASE OBLIGATIONS

Aircraft & Engine Order Commitments

         Future expenditures for aircraft and engines on order as of September 30, 2002 are estimated to be $5.3 billion. The following table shows the timing of these commitments, as adjusted to reflect the deferral in October 2002 of the delivery of the 31 mainline aircraft discussed below:

Year Ending December 31,
(in billions)		Amount
Three months ending December 31, 2002		$	0.3
2003			1.0
2004			0.7
2005			1.2
2006			1.3
After 2006			0.8
	Total	$	5.3

         The table above reflects the deferred delivery of the following 31 mainline aircraft, which will result in no mainline aircraft deliveries during 2003 or 2004:

• five B-737-800 aircraft deferred from 2003 to 2006;

• 23 B-737-800 aircraft deferred from 2004 to 2007;

• one B-777-200 aircraft deferred from 2004 to 2006; and

• two B-777-200 aircraft deferred from 2005 to 2006.

Contract Carrier Agreement Commitments

         We have contract carrier agreements with two regional air carriers, Atlantic Coast Airlines, Inc. and SkyWest Airlines, Inc., which expire in 2010. During the June 2002 quarter, we entered into a contract carrier agreement with a third regional air carrier, Chautauqua Airlines, which expires in 2012. Chautauqua will operate a total of 22 regional jet aircraft that are scheduled to be placed in service between November 2002 and November 2003 under the Delta Connection program.

         Under these contract carrier agreements, we schedule certain aircraft that are operated by those airlines using our flight code, sell the seats on those flights and retain the related revenues. We pay those airlines an amount based on their cost of operating those flights plus a specified margin. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, we recorded costs totaling approximately $145 million and approximately $400 million, respectively, related to the Atlantic Coast Airlines and SkyWest agreements; these amounts include reimbursement to the carriers as well as direct costs we incurred under the programs. For the three months ending December 31, 2002, we expect to record costs totaling approximately $150 million related to the three contract carrier agreements. At September 30, 2002, these regional air carriers operated 92 aircraft for us under these agreements. We anticipate the three regional air carriers will operate 100 aircraft for us by December 31, 2002. Additionally, we estimate that the total fair market value of the aircraft that

16

the three regional air carriers could assign to us or require us to purchase or lease if we terminate the connection carrier contracts in certain circumstances is approximately $1.6 billion.

         For additional information regarding our agreement with Chautauqua, see Note 7 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 15-16) in our Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2002. For further information regarding our agreements with Atlantic Coast Airlines and SkyWest, see Note 11 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 43) in our Annual Report.

Lease Obligations

         The following table summarizes, as of September 30, 2002, our minimum rental commitments under capital leases and noncancelable operating leases with initial or remaining terms in excess of one year:

Years Ending December 31,	Capital		Operating
(in millions)	Leases		Leases
Three months ending December 31, 2002	$	7	$	235
2003		30		1,250
2004		21		1,206
2005		14		1,186
2006		6		1,151
After 2006		11		8,072
Total minimum lease payments		89	$	13,100
Less: Lease payments which represent interest		14
Present value of future minimum capital lease payments		75
Less: Current obligations under capital leases		24
Long-term capital lease obligations	$	51

         The total minimum rental commitments under operating leases in the table above do not include approximately $155 million in future minimum lease payments to be received by us from noncancelable subleases.

         For additional information regarding our lease obligations and purchase commitments, see Notes 10 and 11, respectively, of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 42-43) in our Annual Report.

17

9. DEBT INSTRUMENTS

Future Maturities

         The following table summarizes the scheduled maturities of our debt, including current maturities and short-term obligations, at September 30, 2002, as adjusted by the purchase of a portion of the ESOP Notes and certain refinancings of regional jet aircraft (see Note 16 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q):

Years Ending December 31,	Principal
(in millions)	Amount
Three months ending December 31, 2002	$	395
2003		624
2004		548
2005		1,152
2006		541
After 2006		6,881
Total	$	10,141

Other Financing Arrangements

         On December 28, 2001, we entered into a credit facility with certain banks under which we could borrow up to $625 million on a secured basis until December 27, 2002. The banks’ lending commitment under this facility is reduced, however, to the extent we receive net cash proceeds from the issuance of certain financings. On August 22, 2002, we and the banks amended and restated this facility to extend its term to August 21, 2003 and to reduce the maximum amount we may borrow under this agreement to $500 million. There are no financial covenants in this facility. Any borrowings under this facility will be secured by certain aircraft owned by us. At September 30, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility.

         During the September 2002 quarter, we borrowed $280 million which is due in installments through March 2018 and is secured by nine CRJ-200, two CRJ-700 and four B-737-800 aircraft. This debt bears interest at variable rates. A portion of the proceeds from these borrowings was used to repay $153 million of outstanding interim financing for ten CRJ-200 aircraft. At September 30, 2002, there was $280 million in outstanding borrowings under these financings at variable rates ranging from 2.11% to 3.55%.

         For a discussion of events which occurred subsequent to September 30, 2002 related to our debt, see Note 16 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q. For further information about our debt, see (1) Note 8 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in our Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2002 (pages 15-16) and June 30, 2002 (pages 17-18) and (2) Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 38-41) in our Annual Report.

18

10. ASSET WRITEDOWNS

         During the September 2002 quarter, we recorded asset writedowns totaling $220 million ($139 million net of tax, or $1.13 diluted earnings per share) resulting from management’s review of our fleet plan. This charge was recorded in asset writedowns and other nonrecurring items on our Consolidated Statements of Operations and includes the following items:

Assets Classified as Held for Use

A $141 million writedown to fair market value of eight owned MD-11 aircraft and a $24 million writedown to fair market value of 23 owned B-727-200 aircraft. The impairment of these aircraft reflects a further reduction in their estimated future cash flows and fair market values since our impairment review in 2001 (discussed in Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements on page 42 in our Annual Report). The fair market value of these aircraft was based on third party appraisals. We plan to remove these eight owned MD-11 aircraft from service in early 2003 through early 2004.

Assets Classified as Held for Sale

A $37 million writedown to fair market value of 36 owned B-727-200 aircraft. The impairment of these aircraft resulted from a further decline in their fair market value since our impairment review in 2001. These aircraft will be disposed of as part of our fleet simplification plan and are expected to be sold by December 31, 2003 under an existing agreement. The net book value of these aircraft is included in other noncurrent assets on our Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2002 and is not material. These aircraft are not included in the aircraft fleet table in Note 7 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q since they have been removed from service.

Other

An $18 million charge to writedown MD-11 spare parts inventory to their net realizable value.

11. RESTRUCTURING AND OTHER RESERVES

         The following table shows the reserve balances as of September 30, 2002 and the activity for the nine months then ended for restructuring costs recorded in prior years related to (1) facilities closures and other costs, (2) leased aircraft and (3) severance and related costs:

	Balance at		Additional								Balance at
	December 31,		Costs and								September 30,
(in millions)	2001		Expenses		Payments			Adjustments			2002
Facilities and other	$	74	$	—	$	(7	)	$	(13	)	$	54
Leased aircraft		70		—		(12	)		—			58
Severance and related costs		47		—		(29	)		—			18
Total	$	191	$	—	$	(48	)	$	(13	)	$	130

19

         The facilities and other reserve represents costs related primarily to (1) lease payments to be paid on closed facilities and (2) contract termination fees. The leased aircraft reserve represents lease payments for certain aircraft removed from service prior to their lease expiration date, less estimated sublease rental income. The severance and related costs reserve represents charges recorded in 2001 related primarily to (1) severance for pilots, which will be paid as pilots continue to be furloughed, and (2) medical benefits for employees who received severance or are participating in certain leave of absence programs, which will be paid monthly during 2002.

         During the September 2002 quarter, we recorded an adjustment of $13 million ($8 million net of tax, or $0.07 diluted earnings per share) to the facilities and other reserve balance related to charges recorded prior to 2001 where we determined that the remaining costs will be less than originally estimated. This adjustment was recorded in asset writedowns and other nonrecurring items on our Consolidated Statements of Operations. For additional information regarding our charges for nonrecurring items recorded in prior years, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 41-42) in our Annual Report.

12. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

         Comprehensive income (loss) includes unrealized gains and losses on marketable equity securities and changes in the fair market value of certain derivative instruments which qualify for hedge accounting. The differences between net loss and comprehensive loss for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 are detailed in the following table:

		Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
		September 30,						September 30,
(in millions)		2002			2001			2002			2001
Net loss		$	(326	)	$	(259	)	$	(909	)	$	(482	)
Total other comprehensive income (loss):
	Realization of loss on marketable equity securities		—			—			4			12
	Unrealized loss on marketable equity securities		(3	)		(82	)		(10	)		(86	)
	Realization of gain on derivative instruments		(32	)		(69	)		(96	)		(277	)
	Unrealized gain (loss) on derivative instruments		37			(59	)		116			8
	Other		(1	)		(3	)		(2	)		(3	)
	Income tax effect on other comprehensive income (loss)		—			83			(5	)		135
Total other comprehensive income (loss)			1			(130	)		7			(211	)
Comprehensive loss, net of tax		$	(325	)	$	(389	)	$	(902	)	$	(693	)

20

         The following table shows the unrealized gains (losses), net of tax, included in accumulated other comprehensive income as of September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001:

(in millions)		September 30,			December 31,
		2002			2001
Marketable equity securities		$	(5	)	$	—
Derivative instruments			38			25
Other			(1	)		—
	Accumulated other comprehensive income	$	32		$	25

         As of September 30, 2002, we had recorded $60 million ($38 million net of tax) as total unrealized gains on open fuel hedge contracts in accordance with SFAS 133, which will be realized over the 12 months ending September 30, 2003. For additional information regarding SFAS 133, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 35-36) in our Annual Report and Note 6 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

13. SHAREOWNERS’ EQUITY

         During the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we issued 5,987 shares of common stock and distributed a total of 98,873 shares from treasury under our broad-based employee stock option plans, our 2000 Performance Compensation Plan and the Non-Employee Directors’ Stock Plan. For additional information about our stock compensation plans, see Note 14 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 49-50) in our Annual Report.

14. GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

         We are managed as a single business unit that provides air transportation for passengers and cargo. Our operating revenues by geographic region are summarized in the following table:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
(in millions)		2002		2001		2002		2001
North America		$	2,687	$	2,662	$	8,063	$	8,904
Atlantic			557		532		1,427		1,490
Latin America			139		135		415		432
Pacific			37		69		92		190
	Total	$	3,420	$	3,398	$	9,997	$	11,016

21

15. EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

         We calculate basic earnings (loss) per share by dividing the income (loss) available to common shareowners by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding. Diluted earnings (loss) per share includes the dilutive effects of stock options and convertible securities. To the extent stock options and convertible securities are anti-dilutive, they are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings (loss) per share. The following table shows our computation of basic and diluted loss per share:

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	September 30,						September 30,
	2002			2001			2002			2001
(in millions, except per share data)
BASIC AND DILUTED:
Net loss	$	(326	)	$	(259	)	$	(909	)	$	(482	)
Dividends on allocated Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock		(4	)		(3	)		(11	)		(10	)
Net loss available to common shareowners	$	(330	)	$	(262	)	$	(920	)	$	(492	)
Weighted average shares outstanding		123.3			123.1			123.3			123.1
Basic and diluted loss per share	$	(2.67	)	$	(2.13	)	$	(7.46	)	$	(4.00	)

         The following table shows common stock equivalents that were excluded from the above computation of diluted loss per share because their effect is anti-dilutive:

		Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
		September 30,				September 30,
(in millions)		2002		2001		2002		2001
Additional shares assuming:
	Exercise of stock options		—		0.6		—		0.9
	Conversion of allocated Series B ESOP Convertible Preferred Stock		6.2		5.9		6.0		5.7
	Conversion of performance-based stock units		0.5		0.3		0.5		0.3
Total additional shares			6.7		6.8		6.5		6.9

         For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002, we had 54 million stock options that were excluded from the diluted loss per share computation because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average price of common stock for those respective periods. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001, we had 45 million and 44 million stock options, respectively, that were excluded from the diluted loss per share computation because the exercise price of the options was greater than the average price of common stock for those respective periods.

22

16. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Letter of Credit Reimbursement Agreements

         At September 30, 2002, we were a party to two reimbursement agreements with banks which had issued letters of credit to support certain of our obligations. Under one of these agreements, Commerzbank AG has issued, and there is currently outstanding, letters of credit totaling $409 million to back our obligations with respect to $403 million principal amount of tax exempt municipal bonds issued to finance the construction of certain facilities leased to us (Commerzbank Agreement). Under the other agreement, which we recently terminated, Bayerische Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG had issued a $366 million letter of credit to back our obligations relating to $261 million principal amount of Series C Guaranteed Serial ESOP Notes (ESOP Notes) issued by the Delta Family-Care Savings Plan (HVB Agreement).

         The Commerzbank and HVB Agreements each contained certain financial covenants, including covenants that limited our debt-to-equity ratio and secured debt. As discussed in our Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2002, while we were in full compliance with these covenants, we believe we would not have been in compliance with the debt-to-equity covenant by the end of the December 2002 quarter.

         To address the covenant compliance issue and to increase our financial flexibility, on September 25, 2002, we entered into an amendment to the Commerzbank Agreement to eliminate the debt-to-equity ratio and secured debt covenants from that agreement. In consideration for these changes, we agreed with the banks that are parties to the Commerzbank Agreement (several of which also participated in the HVB Agreement):

• to maintain a minimum of $1 billion of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments as of the end of each month, beginning on October 31, 2002;

• to terminate by October 31 2002, the HVB Agreement and the related letter of credit that supports our obligations with respect to the ESOP Notes. The HVB Agreement was originally scheduled to expire on May 19, 2003;

• to terminate by June 8, 2003 the Commerzbank Agreement and all of the letters of credit issued thereunder. These letters of credit were originally scheduled to expire between June 8, 2003 and December 4, 2003; and

• to pay an amendment fee to the banks which timely consented to the amendment of the Commerzbank Agreement.

         To effect the termination of the HVB Agreement, on September 30, 2002, we provided the required notice of our decision to terminate early the letter of credit issued under that agreement. As a result of this action, each holder of the ESOP Notes had the right to require us to purchase its ESOP Notes before the termination of the letter of credit. Some, but not all, of the holders of the ESOP Notes exercised this right. On October 15, 2002, we purchased ESOP Notes for $215 million, covering $169 million principal amount of ESOP Notes, $4 million of accrued interest and $42 million of make-whole premium. The $42 million loss recognized for the make-whole premiums related to this extinguishment of debt will be recorded in other income (expense) on our Consolidated Statements of Operations during the December 2002 quarter. We subsequently

23

terminated the HVB Agreement and the related letter of credit, and the amendment to the Commerzbank Agreement became effective.

         As a result of the termination of the letter of credit issued under the HVB Agreement, the holders of the $92 million principal amount of ESOP Notes that we did not purchase have the right to require us to purchase their ESOP Notes on February 25, 2003. Our purchase price will be equal to the principal amount of the ESOP Notes tendered for purchase plus accrued interest and a make-whole premium. The amount of the make-whole premium will be determined shortly before the purchase based on then existing interest rates.

         As discussed above, the letters of credit under the Commerzbank Agreement terminate on June 8, 2003. Unless these letters of credit are extended in a timely manner, we will be required to purchase on June 3, 2003 the related $403 million principal amount of tax exempt municipal bonds. In these circumstances, we could seek to remarket the bonds at then prevailing interest rates, but there is no assurance we would be able to do this. For additional information regarding these bonds, see Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 40) in our Annual Report.

Other Financing Arrangements

         On January 31, 2002, we entered into a facility under which we may borrow up to approximately $350 million secured by certain regional jet aircraft which we purchased for cash. In October 2002, this facility was amended by reducing the amount we may borrow to approximately $275 million because we used certain of the regional jet aircraft that served as collateral under this facility as security for other long-term financings. This facility expires on February 1, 2003, except that amounts borrowed prior to that date are due between 366 days and 18 months after the date of borrowing (subject to earlier repayment if certain longer term financing is obtained for those regional jet aircraft). Borrowings under this facility bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin. As of November 13, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility.

         Also on January 31, 2002, we entered into a facility to finance, on a secured basis at the time of acquisition, certain future deliveries of regional jet aircraft. In October 2002, this facility was amended to increase the number of future regional jet aircraft deliveries eligible for financing under this facility, which increased the total borrowings available to us to $400 million. Borrowings under this facility (1) are due between 366 days and 18 months after the date of borrowing (subject to earlier repayment if certain longer-term financing is obtained for these aircraft) and (2) bear interest at LIBOR plus a margin. At November 13, 2002, $100 million was outstanding under this facility.

         In October 2002, we borrowed $268 million which is due in installments through April 2017 and is secured by 18 regional jet aircraft. This debt bears interest at a variable rate. A portion of the proceeds from these borrowings was used to repay $187 million of outstanding interim financing for regional jet aircraft.

         At October 31, 2002, the outstanding borrowings under the financing arrangements discussed above bore interest at variable rates ranging from 3.27% to 4.83%.

24

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Business Environment

         Since September 11, 2001, the airline industry, including Delta, has experienced a substantial revenue challenge. The primary factors contributing to this environment include (1) a sharp decline in high yield business travel after the September 11 terrorist attacks; (2) industry capacity that exceeds demand, which has resulted in heavy fare discounting to stimulate demand; (3) a government imposed passenger security fee adopted after September 11 which we have not been able to pass on to our customers because of the current demand situation; and (4) a reduction in traffic due to the real and perceived “hassle factor” resulting from increased airport security measures. Additionally, our revenues have been adversely affected by the growing presence of low cost carriers.

         The following table shows traffic, capacity and yield for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2002 compared to the corresponding periods in 2001 and 2000:

	Three Months Ended September 30,			Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2002 vs. 2001 (1)		2002 vs. 2000	2002 vs. 2001 (1)	2002 vs. 2000
Traffic		2%	-11%	-4%	-11%
Capacity (2)		-2%	-8%	-6%	-9%
Yield		-3%	-12%	-7%	-13%

(1)

During the three and nine months ended September 30, 2001, our financial performance was materially adversely affected by (i) the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks; (ii) the slowing U.S. and world economies; (iii) the cancellation of a substantial number of flights due to a job action by some Delta pilots and public concern over a possible strike by Delta pilots; and (iv) the Comair pilot strike, which resulted in Comair’s suspension of operations between March 26 and July 1, 2001, and its subsequent ramp-up of service to normal levels following the strike.

(2)

We currently have 20 mainline aircraft that remain temporarily grounded as a result of capacity reductions implemented after the September 11 terrorist attacks.

         Our financial performance also continues to be negatively impacted by significant cost pressures. These include increases in (1) pension expense due primarily to the decrease in the fair market value of our pension plan assets resulting from declining market conditions and to the Delta pilot contract ratified in June 2001; (2) interest expense related to an increase in debt outstanding; (3) war and terrorism risk insurance premiums; and (4) security costs.

         To mitigate the revenue and cost pressures discussed above, we have taken, and will continue to take, additional actions intended to improve our financial performance by (1) improving unit revenue by better aligning capacity with lowered demand; (2) reducing total and unit costs; and (3) preserving liquidity by focusing on cost and capital expenditure management. Key elements of our plan include:

25

• Grounding our MD-11 fleet beginning in early 2003 and deferring all mainline aircraft deliveries in 2003 and 2004. These initiatives will reduce capacity, lower operating costs through fleet simplification and reduce capital expenditures by approximately $1.3 billion during 2003 and 2004.

• Reducing staffing by up to 8,000 jobs, which we estimate will result in approximately $400 million in savings on an annual basis.

• Executing a profit improvement plan in which 15 specific areas of our business are being reviewed to improve our efficiency and reduce our costs. Key areas being reviewed include our network scheduling process, employee benefits, maintenance, product distribution and the onboard customer process.

         Additionally, during the September 2002 quarter, we entered into a proposed marketing agreement with Continental Airlines and Northwest Airlines. This agreement will include codesharing and frequent flyer program reciprocity. The proposed agreement is subject to review by the U.S. Department of Transportation and approval from Delta and Northwest pilots as well as the global alliance partners of the respective airlines.

Outlook

         We do not expect improvement in the revenue environment for the remainder of 2002 through 2003. We also expect significant cost pressures related to increases in pension, interest, insurance and security expenses to continue. We estimate total annual cost increases for 2002 compared to 2001 related to these items to be approximately $800 million.

         For the quarter ending December 31, 2002, we expect to record the following unusual costs: (1) approximately $16 million related to the temporary carrying cost of surplus pilots and grounded aircraft related to our capacity reductions on November 1, 2001 and (2) $42 million related to the purchase of a portion of the outstanding ESOP Notes. For additional information on the purchase of the ESOP Notes, see Note 16 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q. Additionally, we expect to record an unusual charge relating to the early retirement, leave of absence and severance programs offered to employees during the December 2002 quarter as part of our initiative to further reduce employee costs. The amount of this charge will depend on the number of employees that accept the various programs, which we do not presently know.

         On December 31, 2002, we expect to record a substantial non-cash charge to equity related to our defined benefit pension plans (Pension Plans). This charge is a result of our accumulated benefit obligation under those plans exceeding the fair market value of the Pension Plans’ assets as of September 30, 2002. This charge will affect our balance sheet, but will not impact earnings. For additional information on our Pension Plans, see the Financial Condition and Liquidity section in Management’s Discussions and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.

26

         As a result of the September 11 terrorist attacks, aviation insurers significantly reduced the coverage and increased the premium rates for war and terrorism risk insurance for commercial airlines. Since then, the U.S. government has been providing U.S. airlines with excess war and terrorism risk insurance coverage for 60-day periods, with the current 60-day period scheduled to expire on December 16, 2002. If the government fails to renew this excess coverage, our results of operations would be materially adversely affected.

         We expect our capacity for the December 2002 quarter to be up 2%-2.5% compared to the December 2001 quarter, though down 9%-10% compared to the December 2000 quarter.

         Based on the information above, and expected seasonal declines in revenues, we expect to record a loss in the December 2002 quarter that will be greater than the loss recorded for the September 2002 quarter. We also anticipate that cash flows from operations will be negative for the December 2002 quarter.

Three Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001

Net Income (Loss) and Earnings (Loss) per Share

         Our unaudited consolidated net loss was $326 million for the September 2002 quarter ($2.67 diluted loss per share), compared to a net loss of $259 million ($2.13 diluted loss per share) in the September 2001 quarter.

Unusual Items

         Our results of operations for the September 2002 and September 2001 quarters include the following items, which are collectively referred to as “unusual items” in this discussion of those three month periods.

September 2002 Quarter

         In the September 2002 quarter, we recorded unusual items totaling a $181 million charge ($114 million net of tax, or $0.92 diluted earnings per share), consisting of the following gains and charges:

Gains:

• A $34 million gain ($22 million net of tax, or $0.18 diluted earnings per share) resulting from the final installment of compensation due under the Air Transportation Safety and System Stabilization Act (Stabilization Act). For additional information on this subject, see Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 32-33) in our Annual Report.

• A $13 million non-cash gain ($8 million net of tax, or $0.07 diluted earnings per share) for the adjustment to actual requirements of certain restructuring reserves established prior to 2001. For additional information on these restructuring reserves, see Note 11 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

27

• A $10 million non-cash gain ($6 million net of tax, or $0.05 diluted earnings per share) for fair value adjustments of financial instruments accounted for under SFAS 133. This gain relates to derivative instruments we use in our fuel hedging program and to our equity warrants and other similar rights in certain companies. For additional information on SFAS 133, see Note 6 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Charges:

• A $220 million charge ($139 million net of tax, or $1.13 diluted earnings per share) for the writedown of certain MD-11 and
B-727-200 aircraft and MD-11 spare parts inventory. For additional information regarding these writedowns, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

• An $18 million expense ($11 million net of tax, or $0.09 diluted earnings per share) for the temporary carrying cost of surplus pilots and grounded aircraft related to our capacity reductions which became effective on November 1, 2001. This cost also includes related requalification training and relocation costs for certain pilots and is included in asset writedowns and other nonrecurring items on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

September 2001 Quarter

         In the September 2001 quarter, we recorded unusual items totaling a $60 million gain ($36 million net of tax, or $0.30 diluted earnings per share), consisting of the following gains and charges:

Gains:

• A $171 million gain ($104 million net of tax, or $0.85 diluted earnings per share) that reflects a portion of the total compensation we received under the Stabilization Act.

• An $11 million gain ($7 million net of tax, or $0.06 diluted earnings per share) from the sale of our equity interest in Equant, N.V. (Equant), an international data network services company. For additional information about this sale, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 35) in our Annual Report.

Charges:

• A $68 million charge ($42 million net of tax, or $0.34 diluted earnings per share) relating to our announcement that we would reduce staffing by up to 13,000 employee positions. For additional information regarding this charge, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 41-42) in our Annual Report.

• A $54 million non-cash charge ($33 million net of tax, or $0.27 diluted earnings per share) for fair value adjustments of financial instruments accounted for under SFAS 133.

28

Operating Revenues

         Operating revenues totaled $3.4 billion in the September 2002 quarter, a 1% increase from the September 2001 quarter. Passenger revenues decreased 1% to $3.2 billion. Revenue passenger miles increased 2% on a capacity decline of 2%, while passenger mile yield fell 3%. The financial results for the September 2002 quarter reflect the continuing effects of the September 11 terrorist attacks on our business, as previously discussed in the Business Environment section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.

North American Passenger Revenues - North American passenger revenues fell 1% to $2.5 billion for the September 2002 quarter. Revenue passenger miles increased 3% on a capacity decrease of 2%, while passenger mile yield fell 3%. The decline in passenger mile yield reflects the challenging revenue environment, including a significant reduction in business traffic after the September 11 terrorist attacks.

International Passenger Revenues - International passenger revenues decreased 1% to $665 million during the September 2002 quarter. Revenue passenger miles decreased 1% on a capacity decline of 4%, while passenger mile yield remained flat.

Cargo and Other Revenues - Cargo revenues fell $4 million, or 3%, in the September 2002 quarter primarily due to the continuing effects of the September 11 terrorist attacks, including FAA restrictions on the carriage of mail by passenger airlines. Cargo ton miles decreased 4% and cargo ton mile yield increased 1%. Other revenues increased $51 million, or 55%, primarily reflecting a 19% increase due to higher codeshare revenues and a 19% increase due to higher administrative service fees.

Operating Expenses

         Operating expenses for the September 2002 quarter totaled $3.8 billion, a 4% increase from $3.6 billion in the September 2001 quarter. Operating capacity declined 2% to 37 billion available seat miles. CASM increased 6.8% to 10.33¢ and fuel price neutralized CASM increased 6.5% to 10.30¢. Excluding unusual items, operating expenses decreased 4%, CASM decreased 1.3% to 9.81¢ and fuel price neutralized CASM decreased 1.6% to 9.78¢.

         Salaries and related costs increased 1% to $1.6 billion. This reflects a 5% increase due to higher pension expense, a 3% increase due primarily to salary and benefit rate increases for pilots and mechanics, and a 3% increase due to various other factors, such as the ramp-up of operations at Comair following the pilot strike in 2001, offset by a 10% decrease due to staffing reductions implemented as a result of the capacity reductions made after September 11, 2001.

         Aircraft fuel expense totaled $468 million during the September 2002 quarter, a 1% decrease from $472 million in the September 2001 quarter. The average fuel price per gallon increased 2% to 71.33¢. Total gallons consumed decreased 3% mainly due to capacity reductions. Our fuel cost is shown net of fuel hedge gains of $32 million in the September 2002 quarter and $69 million in the September 2001 quarter. Approximately 50% and 45% of our aircraft fuel requirements were hedged during the September 2002 and 2001 quarters, respectively.

29

         Depreciation and amortization expense fell 9%. This primarily reflects a 7% decrease due to changes in our asset base. Our adoption on January 1, 2002 of SFAS 142, which requires that goodwill and certain other intangible assets no longer be amortized, also contributed to the decline in depreciation and amortization expense. For additional information regarding SFAS 142, see Note 2 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

         Contracted services expense increased 3% due to an increase in security costs. Landing fees and other rents increased 8%, reflecting a 3% increase due to higher landing fee rates in the current period. Additionally, landing fees and other rents increased 3% due to lower costs in the September 2001 quarter during the ramp-up of Comair operations following its pilot strike. Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs expense decreased 16%, primarily from reduced maintenance volume and materials consumption. Aircraft rent expense fell 4% due mainly to a decrease in the number of leased aircraft from our fleet simplification efforts. Other selling expenses decreased 7%, primarily reflecting an 8% decrease due to reduced advertising and promotion spending and a 5% decrease due to lower booking fee costs from lower revenues, partially offset by a 7% increase due to higher rates related to credit card charges.

         Passenger commissions expense declined 47% primarily due to the change in our commission rate structure. On March 14, 2002, we eliminated travel agent base commissions for tickets sold in the U.S. and Canada.

         Passenger service expense decreased 23% due primarily to meal service reductions. Other operating expenses decreased 1%, primarily reflecting decreases in various miscellaneous expenses, such as supplies, utilities and communications, largely offset by a 22% increase in expenses due to higher war and terrorism risk insurance rates.

Operating Loss and Operating Margin

         We incurred an operating loss of $385 million for the September 2002 quarter, compared to an operating loss of $251 million in the September 2001 quarter. Operating margin, which is the ratio of operating income (loss) to operating revenues, was (11%) and (7%) for the September 2002 and September 2001 quarters, respectively.

         Excluding unusual items, we incurred an operating loss of $194 million for the September 2002 quarter, compared to an operating loss of $354 million in the September 2001 quarter. Operating margin excluding unusual items was (6%) and (10%) for the September 2002 and September 2001 quarters, respectively.

Other Income (Expense)

         Other expense in the September 2002 quarter was $142 million, compared to other expense of $157 million in the September 2001 quarter. The September 2002 quarter includes a $10 million non-cash gain for fair value adjustments under SFAS 133, while the September 2001 quarter includes a $51 million non-cash charge for fair value adjustments under SFAS 133 and an $11 million gain on the sale of our equity interest in Equant. Interest expense for the September 2002

30

quarter increased $39 million compared to the September 2001 quarter due to higher levels of debt outstanding. Interest income for the September 2002 quarter decreased $12 million due to lower interest rates and a lower cash balance compared to the September 2001 quarter. Miscellaneous income increased $17 million due primarily to our equity investment in Worldspan and higher losses in the September 2001 quarter resulting from our investment in Orbitz.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002 and 2001

Net Income (Loss) and Earnings (Loss) per Share

         Our unaudited consolidated net loss was $909 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 ($7.46 diluted loss per share), compared to a net loss of $482 million ($4.00 diluted loss per share) for the nine months ended September 30, 2001.

Unusual Items

         Our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001 include the following items, which are collectively referred to as “unusual items” in this discussion of those nine month periods.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2002

         In the nine months ended September 30, 2002, we recorded unusual items totaling a $287 million charge ($181 million net of tax, or $1.47 diluted earnings per share), consisting of the following gains and charges:

Gains:

• A $34 million gain ($22 million net of tax, or $0.18 diluted earnings per share) resulting from the final installment of compensation due under the Stabilization Act. For additional information on this subject, see Note 2 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 32-33) in our Annual Report.

• A $13 million non-cash gain ($8 million net of tax, or $0.07 diluted earnings per share) for the adjustment to actual requirements of certain restructuring reserves established prior to 2001. For additional information on these restructuring reserves, see Note 11 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Charges:

• A $220 million charge ($139 million net of tax, or $1.13 diluted earnings per share) for the writedown of certain MD-11 and
B-727-200 aircraft and MD-11 spare parts inventory. For additional information regarding these writedowns, see Note 10 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

• An $81 million expense ($51 million net of tax, or $0.42 diluted earnings per share) for the temporary carrying cost of surplus pilots and grounded aircraft related to our capacity reductions

31

which became effective on November 1, 2001. This cost also includes related requalification training and relocation costs for certain pilots and is included in asset writedowns and other nonrecurring items on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

•

A $33 million non-cash charge ($21 million net of tax, or $0.17 diluted earnings per share) for fair value adjustments of financial instruments accounted for under SFAS 133. This charge relates to derivative instruments we use in our fuel hedging program and to our equity warrants and other similar rights in certain companies. For additional information on SFAS 133, see Note 6 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Nine Months Ended September 30, 2001

         In the nine months ended September 30, 2001, we recorded unusual items totaling a $95 million gain ($58 million net of tax, or $0.47 diluted earnings per share), consisting of the following gains and charges:

Gains:

• A $171 million gain ($104 million net of tax, or $0.85 diluted earnings per share) that reflects a portion of the total compensation we received under the Stabilization Act.

• A $41 million non-cash gain ($25 million net of tax, or $0.20 diluted earnings per share) for fair value adjustments of financial instruments accounted for under SFAS 133.

• An $11 million gain ($7 million net of tax, or $0.06 diluted earnings per share) from the sale of our equity interest in Equant. For additional information about this sale, see Note 3 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 35) in our Annual Report.

Charges:

• A $68 million charge ($42 million net of tax, or $0.34 diluted earnings per share) relating to our announcement to reduce staffing by up to 13,000 employee positions. For additional information regarding this charge, see Note 9 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (page 41-42) in our Annual Report.

• A $60 million charge ($36 million net of tax, or $0.30 diluted earnings per share) related to our decision to accelerate the retirement of nine B-737 aircraft in 2002. The retirement of these aircraft was intended to more closely align capacity with expected demand and to improve scheduling and operating efficiency.

Operating Revenues

         Operating revenues totaled $10.0 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, a 9% decrease from the same period in 2001. Passenger revenues decreased 10% to $9.3 billion. Revenue passenger miles declined 4% on a 6% decrease in capacity, while passenger mile yield fell 7%. These decreases reflect the continuing effects of the September 11 terrorist attacks on our

32

business, as previously discussed in the Business Environment section of Management’s Discussion and Analysis in this Form 10-Q.

North American Passenger Revenues - North American passenger revenues fell 11% to $7.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Revenue passenger miles decreased 3% on a capacity decline of 5%, while passenger mile yield decreased 9%. The decline in passenger mile yield reflects the challenging revenue environment, including a significant reduction in business traffic after the September 11 terrorist attacks.

International Passenger Revenues - International passenger revenues decreased 8% to $1.8 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2002. Revenue passenger miles decreased 8% on a capacity decline of 11%, while passenger mile yield remained relatively flat.

Cargo and Other Revenues - Cargo revenues fell $55 million, or 14%, for the nine months ended September 30, 2002. This reflects a 9% decline in mail revenues due primarily to FAA restrictions on the carriage of mail by passenger airlines and a 6% decrease due to a decline in freight volumes resulting from a decrease in Asia flights and lower domestic volumes and yields. Cargo ton miles decreased 10% and cargo ton mile yield decreased 5%. Other revenues increased $101 million, or 33%, primarily reflecting a 12% increase due to higher administrative service fees and a 9% increase due to higher codeshare revenues.

Operating Expenses

         Operating expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 totaled $10.9 billion, decreasing 5% from $11.5 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Operating capacity fell 6% to 106 billion available seat miles. CASM grew 1.7% to 10.28¢, while fuel price neutralized CASM grew 2.9% to 10.40¢. Excluding unusual items, operating expenses decreased 7%, CASM decreased 1.1% to 10.04¢ and fuel price neutralized CASM increased 0.1% to 10.16¢.

         Salaries and related costs totaled $4.6 billion for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, a 2% decrease from $4.7 billion recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The nine months ended September 30, 2002 primarily reflect an 11% decrease due to staffing reductions implemented as a result of the capacity reductions made after September 11, 2001, partially offset by a 5% increase due to higher pension expense and a 3% rise due primarily to salary and benefit rate increases for pilots and mechanics.

         Aircraft fuel expense totaled $1.2 billion during the nine months ended September 30, 2002, a 17% decrease from $1.4 billion during the same period in 2001. The average fuel price per gallon fell 9% to 63.93¢. Total gallons consumed decreased 8% mainly due to capacity reductions. Our fuel cost is shown net of fuel hedge gains of $96 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and $277 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Approximately 60% and 56% of our aircraft fuel requirements were hedged during the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

         Depreciation and amortization expense fell 12%. This primarily reflects a 6% decrease due to changes in our asset base. Our adoption on January 1, 2002 of SFAS 142, which requires that

33

goodwill and certain other intangible assets no longer be amortized, also contributed to the decline in depreciation and amortization expense. For additional information regarding SFAS 142, see Note 2 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

         Contracted services expense remained flat primarily due to a 4% increase from higher security costs offset by a 4% decrease due to fewer contract workers across all workgroups. Landing fees and other rents rose 7%, reflecting a 3% increase from higher airport rents and landing fee rates in the current period. Additionally, landing fees and other rents increased 2% due to lower costs during the 2001 period resulting from the Comair pilot strike and subsequent ramp-up of operations. Aircraft maintenance materials and outside repairs expense fell 8%, primarily reflecting a 10% decrease from a reduction in maintenance volume and materials consumption due to the timing of maintenance events, partially offset by a 3% increase due to lower costs during the 2001 period resulting from the Comair pilot strike and subsequent ramp-up of operations. Aircraft rent expense fell 4% due primarily to a decrease in the number of leased aircraft from our fleet simplification efforts. Other selling expenses fell 14% due primarily to an 11% decrease from lower volumes of credit card and booking transactions due to lower revenues, as well as a 5% decrease due to reduced advertising and promotion spending.

         Passenger commissions expense declined 36%, primarily due to the change in our commission rate structure. Passenger service expense fell 21%, primarily reflecting a 14% decrease due to meal service reductions and a 9% decrease due to lower traffic. Other operating expenses decreased 13% primarily due to decreases in various miscellaneous expenses, such as supplies, utilities and professional fees, partially offset by an 18% increase in expenses due to a rise in war and terrorism risk insurance rates.

Operating Income and Operating Margin

         We incurred an operating loss of $947 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to an operating loss of $480 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Operating margin, which is the ratio of operating income (loss) to operating revenues, was (9%) and (4%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

         Excluding unusual items, we incurred an operating loss of $693 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2002, compared to an operating loss of $523 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Operating margin excluding unusual items was (7%) and (5%) for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Other Income (Expense)

         Other expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 was $469 million, compared to other expense of $249 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2001. The nine months ended September 30, 2002 includes a $33 million non-cash charge for fair value adjustments under SFAS 133. The nine months ended September 30, 2001 includes a $44 million non-cash gain for fair value adjustments under SFAS 133, a $7 million gain on the sale of priceline common stock and an $11 million gain on the sale of our equity interest in Equant. Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 increased $127 million compared to the nine months ended

34

September 30, 2001 due to higher levels of debt outstanding. Interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 decreased $43 million due to lower interest rates and a lower cash balance compared to the nine months ended September 30, 2001. Miscellaneous income rose $49 million primarily due to a $22 million increase in income related to our equity investment in Worldspan and higher losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2001 resulting from our investment in Orbitz and a $9 million decrease in fees related to the sale of accounts receivables in accordance with our securitization agreement.

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY

Sources and Uses of Cash

         Cash and cash equivalents totaled $1.7 billion at September 30, 2002, compared to $2.2 billion at December 31, 2001. For the nine months ended September 30, 2002, net cash provided by operations totaled $78 million, including (1) receipt of $112 million under the Stabilization Act; (2) a $160 million tax refund for 2001; and (3) a $340 million tax refund from a new tax law. Our cash flows from significant financing and investing activities are described below.

         Capital expenditures, including aircraft acquisitions made under seller financing arrangements, during the first nine months of 2002 were $1.5 billion and included the acquisition of 29 CRJ-200, six CRJ-700, four B-737-800, three B-767-400 and one B-777-200 aircraft. Capital expenditures, including aircraft acquisitions made under seller financing arrangements, for the remaining three months of this year are expected to be approximately $450 million, including approximately $300 million for the purchase of regional jet aircraft. For 2003, we expect capital expenditures to be $1.6 billion, including approximately $1.0 billion for regional jet aircraft.

         Debt and capital lease obligations, including current maturities and short-term obligations, totaled $10.2 billion at September 30, 2002 compared to $9.4 billion at December 31, 2001. During 2002, we have taken the following actions to strengthen our liquidity (see Notes 8, 9 and 16 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q):

• On January 25, 2002, we sold in a private placement $176 million principal amount of a new, subordinated tranche of previously issued enhanced equipment trust certificates. The new Series D Certificates bear interest at 9.11% per year and are due on November 18, 2005.

• On January 31, 2002, we entered into a facility, as amended, under which we may borrow up to approximately $275 million, secured by certain regional jet aircraft which we purchased for cash. As of November 13, 2002, there were no outstanding borrowings under this facility.

• Also on January 31, 2002, we entered into a facility, as amended, under which we may finance, on a secured basis at the time of acquisition, up to $400 million for certain future deliveries of regional jet aircraft. As of November 13, 2002, $100 million was outstanding under this facility.

35

• On April 30, 2002, we issued in a public offering $1.1 billion aggregate principal amount of enhanced equipment trust certificates, commonly referred to as an EETC financing. This financing is secured by 32 aircraft owned by us. A portion of the proceeds from the public offering was used to repay the $625 million of borrowings outstanding under our 1997 Bank Credit Agreement, which terminated on May 1, 2002.

• During the September 2002 quarter, we borrowed $280 million which is due in installments through March 2018 and is secured by 11 regional jet and four B-737-800 aircraft. At November 13, 2002, there was $280 million in outstanding borrowings under these financings.

• On August 22, 2002, we amended and restated an existing credit facility to (1) extend the term from December 27, 2002 to August 21, 2003 and (2) reduce the maximum amount we may borrow from $625 million to $500 million. There are no financial covenants in this facility. Any borrowings under this facility will be secured by certain aircraft owned by us. At November 13, 2002, no borrowings were outstanding under this facility.

• On September 25, 2002, we entered into an amendment to our letter of credit reimbursement agreement with Commerzbank AG that (1) eliminated the debt-to-equity ratio and secured debt covenants from that agreement; (2) added a covenant requiring us to maintain a minimum of $1 billion of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments as of the end of each month, beginning on October 31, 2002; and (3) will terminate that agreement and the related letters of credit by June 8, 2003.

• In October, 2002, we borrowed $268 million which is due in installments through April 2017 and is secured by 18 regional jet aircraft. A portion of the proceeds from these borrowings was used to repay $187 million of outstanding interim financing for regional jet aircraft.

• We have deferred delivery of the following 31 mainline aircraft:

• five B-737-800 aircraft deferred from 2003 to 2006;

• 23 B-737-800 aircraft deferred from 2004 to 2007;

• one B-777-200 aircraft deferred from 2004 to 2006; and

• two B-777-200 aircraft deferred from 2005 to 2006.

         As a result of these deferrals, we will receive no mainline aircraft deliveries in 2003 or 2004, which will reduce our capital expenditures by approximately $1.3 billion during that two-year period.

36

         The following tables show our aircraft on order and option at October 31, 2002 and reflect the deferral of the 31 mainline aircraft discussed above, as well as the delivery of six regional jet aircraft in October.

	Delivery in Calendar Year
											After
Aircraft on Order	2002*		2003		2004		2005		2006		2006		Total
B-737-800		—		—		—		19		19		23		61
B-777-200		—		—		—		2		3		—		5
CRJ-200		3		31		—		—		—		—		34
CRJ-700		5		20		23		—		—		—		48
Total		8		51		23		21		22		23		148

	Delivery in Calendar Year
											After				Rolling
Aircraft on Option**	2002*		2003		2004		2005		2006		2006		Total		Options**
B-737-800		—		—		4		8		10		38		60		231
B-757-200		—		—		7		6		6		1		20		47
B-767-300/300ER		—		—		—		2		2		6		10		9
B-767-400		—		—		2		2		2		18		24		3
B-777-200		—		—		2		5		1		12		20		14
CRJ-200		—		—		34		38		31		99		202		—
CRJ-700		—		—		5		30		30		100		165		—
Total		—		—		54		91		82		274		501		304

*	Indicates the number of aircraft on order or option for November and December of 2002.
**	Aircraft options have scheduled delivery slots. Rolling Options replace options and are assigned delivery slots as options expire or are exercised.

         Shareowners’ equity was $2.8 billion at September 30, 2002 and $3.8 billion at December 31, 2001. Our net debt-to-capital position, which includes implied debt from operating leases, was 84% at September 30, 2002 and 80% at December 31, 2001.

Working Capital Position

         We had negative working capital of $2.7 billion at September 30, 2002 and December 31, 2001. A negative working capital position is normal for us, typically due to our air traffic liability. Our working capital position for the nine months ended September 30, 2002 primarily reflects (1) proceeds received from EETC financings; (2) an increase in accounts receivable due primarily to a higher income tax receivable estimate; (3) the repayment of $625 million of borrowings outstanding under the 1997 Bank Credit Agreement; (4) capital expenditures for aircraft and ground equipment; and (5) an increase in our air traffic liability.

37

Credit Ratings

         At September 30, 2002, our senior unsecured long-term debt was rated Ba3 by Moody’s and BB- by Standard & Poor’s. Both Moody’s and Standard & Poor’s ratings outlooks for our long-term credit ratings are negative.

         The lowering of Delta’s credit ratings could negatively impact our ability to issue debt, to renew outstanding letters of credit which back certain of our obligations and to obtain certain financial instruments that we use in our fuel hedging program. It could also increase the cost of these transactions, the cost of obtaining additional financings and the cost of renewing our insurance, including workers’ compensation and director and officer liability insurance. As discussed in Note 3 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, we may be required to repurchase outstanding receivables that we sold to a third party if our senior unsecured long-term debt is rated either below Ba3 by Moody’s or below BB- by Standard & Poor’s. For additional information regarding our credit ratings, see page 19 of our Annual Report.

Commitments

         In accordance with GAAP, certain contractual commitments are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets and discussed in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, while other contractual commitments are discussed in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. The following items are included in our Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 2002:

• Debt, totaling $10.1 billion. A portion of this debt is backed by letters of credit currently totaling $305 million which expire during 2003. For information regarding our debt, including these letters of credit, see Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 38-41) in our Annual Report and Notes 9 and 16 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

• Capital lease obligations, totaling $75 million, discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

         The following contractual commitments are discussed only in the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements:

• Operating lease payments, totaling $13.1 billion, discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q. A portion of these obligations is backed by letters of credit totaling $104 million which expire during 2003 as discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 38-41) in our Annual Report. For a discussion of events which occurred subsequent to September 30, 2002 related to these letters of credit, see Note 16 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

38

• Estimated future expenditures for aircraft and engines on order as of September 30, 2002, totaling $5.3 billion, discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

• Obligations under our contract carrier agreements with SkyWest Airlines, Atlantic Coast Airlines and Chautauqua Airlines, discussed in Note 8 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q, which we estimate will total approximately $150 million for the three months ending December 31, 2002.

• Contingent repurchase obligations related to accounts receivable sold to a third party, discussed in Note 3 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

• Contingent repurchase obligations related to the $92 million principal amount of ESOP Notes outstanding at November 13, 2002, discussed in Note 16 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

*    *    *    *    *    *

         We expect to meet our obligations as they come due through available cash and cash equivalents, investments, internally generated funds and borrowings under existing credit agreements and new financing transactions. We have unencumbered assets available for use in potential financing transactions. Financing transactions continue to be an important element of our liquidity strategy. While we expect there to be financing available to us on commercially reasonable terms, in the current business environment, access to financing cannot be assured.

Pension Plans

         We sponsor defined benefit pension plans (Pension Plans) for eligible employees and retirees. To the extent the accumulated benefit obligation (ABO) of these plans exceeds the fair market value of the plan assets, the excess ABO is referred to as unfunded. SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” (SFAS 87), requires that a minimum pension liability be recognized at year end in an amount at least equal to the amount by which the ABO exceeds the fair market value of the plan assets. This amount is charged to an intangible asset to the extent of any unrecognized prior service costs and unrecognized transition obligation. Any amount in excess is charged, net of tax, to accumulated other comprehensive income.

         As a result of declining market conditions, the fair market value of our plan assets at September 30, 2002 has significantly declined since the same date last year. While we have not yet completed the determination of our ABO at September 30, 2002, we believe that the combined impact of the market performance of our plan assets, a change in the discount rate used in determining our ABO, an additional year of plan participant service and other actuarial losses will result in an unfunded ABO and a charge to accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31, 2002. This charge will affect our balance sheet, but will not impact earnings. In our Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2002, we estimated that this charge to equity would be $700 million to $800

39

million, net of tax, but noted that the final amount of the charge may differ materially from this estimate.

         Since we made that estimate, the value of our plan assets has declined further and we announced certain initiatives intended to improve our financial performance. Two of these initiatives, (1) reducing staffing by up to 8,000 jobs and (2) conducting a strategic benefits review to manage employee benefit expenses, will affect the calculation of our minimum pension liability. As a result of these factors and the fact that we have not completed the determination of our ABO, we are unable to update the estimated charge at this time. In accordance with GAAP, we will record the minimum pension liability at December 31, 2002.

         As previously disclosed, we also expect to provide cash funding of up to $250 million by the first quarter of 2004 to our Pension Plans for the Pension Plan year beginning on July 1, 2002 and ending on June 30, 2003. This cash outflow is due to the Employee Retirement Pension Plan Income Security Act’s (ERISA) minimum funding requirements. Any additional funding obligation that we may have for subsequent Pension Plan years is contingent on several factors and is thus not reasonably estimable at this time.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

         The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions. We periodically evaluate these estimates and assumptions, which are based on historical experience, changes in the business environment and other factors that management believes to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates.

         Critical accounting policies are defined as those that are both important to the portrayal of the Company’s financial condition and results, and require management to exercise significant judgments. Our most critical accounting policies are described on page 21 of the Annual Report. As a result of our adoption of a new accounting standard, we have the following addition to our critical accounting policies:

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

         On January 1, 2002, we adopted SFAS 142, which addresses financial accounting and reporting for goodwill and other intangible assets. Information about our adoption of this statement and its impact to our financial statements is discussed in Note 2 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Goodwill

         We have three reporting units which have assigned goodwill: Delta - mainline, Comair and ASA. Quoted stock market prices are not available for these individual reporting units. Accordingly, our total market capitalization is only one of many factors we consider as a basis for determining each reporting unit’s fair value or for concluding that an interim impairment test is required. Consistent with SFAS 142, our methodology for estimating the fair value of each

40

reporting unit primarily considers discounted future cash flows. To determine the estimated discounted future cash flows, we make assumptions about each reporting unit’s (1) future financial results based on projections of capacity, yields, traffic, operating costs and other relevant factors and (2) current weighted average costs of capital.

         Our transitional goodwill impairment test, which was performed with the assistance of an independent valuation consultant, was completed by June 30, 2002, as required. This test indicated that there was no impairment of our goodwill balances upon adoption of SFAS 142.

         We concluded that an interim update to our transitional goodwill impairment test was not required at September 30, 2002. This conclusion was based on the facts and circumstances below:

• We believe it is not appropriate to consider our market capitalization as the sole factor in determining the fair value of our reporting units;

• Our financial performance from January 1, 2002 through June 30, 2002 was consistent with projections used in the January 1, 2002 impairment test;

• Our January 1, 2002 impairment test indicated that the fair value of each reporting unit significantly exceeded its carrying value;

• We recently announced initiatives which we believe will improve future cash flows and financial performance; and

• ASA and Comair, which comprise 90% of our goodwill balance, continue to show positive cash flows and operating results.

         Our annual financial planning process will be completed during the December 2002 quarter. Our detailed annual goodwill impairment test, which will be completed during the December 2002 quarter, will reflect the results of this process.

Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

         Our indefinite-lived intangible assets are comprised primarily of international routes. The fair value of these assets is determined in a similar manner as discussed above for goodwill with comparable assumptions. No events have occurred or circumstances changed which would lead us to believe that we should update our impairment test performed as of January 1, 2002 or that the useful lives of these intangible assets are not indefinite.

         Changes to assumptions in our fair value-based impairment tests related to goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets may have a material effect on our financial statements.

41

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Aircraft Fuel Price Risk

         We are subject to price risk associated with our jet fuel purchases. We manage this risk with our fuel hedging program. At September 30, 2002, the fair market value of our derivative instruments, consisting primarily of heating oil contracts, was $96 million, compared to $64 million at December 31, 2001. A 10% decrease in the average annual price of heating oil would have decreased the fair market value of these instruments by $57 million at September 30, 2002. For the three months ending December 31, 2002, we have hedged 52% of our projected aircraft fuel requirements at an average hedge price of 67.46¢ per gallon. We do not enter into fuel hedge contracts for speculative purposes. For additional information regarding our fuel hedging program, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements (pages 35-36) in our Annual Report as well as Note 6 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

Interest Rate Risk

         To more effectively manage our interest rate exposure, on July 18, 2002, we entered into two interest rate swap agreements relating to our (1) $300 million principal amount of unsecured Series C Medium Term Notes due March 15, 2004, which pay interest at a fixed rate of 6.65% per year and (2) $500 million principal amount of unsecured Notes due December 15, 2005, which pay interest at a fixed rate of 7.70% per year.

         Under the first interest rate swap agreement, we are paying LIBOR plus a margin per year and receiving 6.65% per year on a notional amount of $300 million until March 15, 2004. Under the second agreement, we are paying LIBOR plus a margin per year and receiving 7.70% per year on a notional amount of $500 million until December 15, 2005. Each of these transactions qualifies for hedge accounting under SFAS 133 and is accounted for as a fair value hedge. We do not enter into interest rate hedge agreements for speculative purposes.

         At September 30, 2002, the fair market value of our interest rate swap agreements was $18 million. A 10% increase in average annual interest rates would have decreased the fair market value of these instruments by approximately $6 million at September 30, 2002.

Equity Securities Risk

         We hold equity interests, including warrants and other similar rights, in certain companies, primarily priceline and Republic. A 10% change in the fair market value of our equity holdings would not have a material impact on our earnings. For a discussion of our equity interests in priceline and Republic at September 30, 2002, see Note 4 of the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this Form 10-Q.

         For additional information regarding our other exposures to market risks, see “Market Risks Associated With Financial Instruments” (pages 21-23), as well as Notes 3, 4 and 5 (pages 33-37) of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, in our Annual Report.

42

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

         Based on their evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures conducted within 90 days of the date of filing this report on Form 10-Q, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information required to be included in this report on Form 10-Q. There were no significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of their evaluation.

43

INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS’ REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Shareowners of
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia

We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (the “Company”) and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2002, and the related consolidated statements of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods then ended and the condensed consolidated statement of cash flows for the nine-month period then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.

We conducted our review in accordance with standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures to financial data and of making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.

Based on our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to such consolidated financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying condensed financial information as of December 31, 2001, and for the three-month and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2001, were not audited or reviewed by us and, accordingly, we do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on them.

/s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Atlanta, Georgia
October 14, 2002

44

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

         As discussed on page 15 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, numerous airlines, including Delta, are defendants in a purported class action antitrust lawsuit pending in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina on behalf of all travel agents in the United States which sold tickets from September 1, 1997 to the present on any of the defendant airlines. The lawsuit alleges that Delta and the other airline defendants conspired to fix travel agent commissions in violation of Section 1 of the Sherman Act. In September, 2002, the District Court granted plaintiffs’ motion for class action certification. The trial of this lawsuit is scheduled to begin on April 29, 2003. Similar litigation alleging violations under Canadian competition law is pending against Delta and other airlines in Canada.

         In August 2002, a U.S. travel agency filed a purported class action lawsuit in New York state court against Delta, American Airlines, Continental Airlines, Northwest Airlines, United Air Lines and JetBlue Airways, on behalf of an alleged nationwide class of U.S. travel agents. JetBlue has been dismissed from the case, and the remaining defendants removed the action to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The lawsuit alleges that the defendants breached their contracts with and their duties of good faith and fair dealing to U.S. travel agencies when these airlines discontinued the payment of published base commissions to U.S. travel agencies at various times beginning in March 2002. The plaintiffs seek unspecified damages, as well as declaratory and injunctive relief. Similar litigation involving contract claims alleged under the agency agreements applicable to Canadian travel agents is pending against Delta and other airlines in Canada.

45

Item 5. Other Information

Employee Matters

         Delta Flight Attendant Representation Election. On February 1, 2002, the National Mediation Board (NMB) announced that Delta’s approximately 19,000 flight attendants rejected union representation by a 71% to 29% margin. The NMB is investigating charges of interference filed against us by the Association of Flight Attendants. We believe these charges are without merit.

         ALPA Grievance. On November 1, 2001, the Air Line Pilots Association, International (ALPA), the union representing Delta pilots, filed a grievance asserting that Delta’s plan to furlough up to 1,400 pilots is not permitted under the collective bargaining agreement between Delta and ALPA. These furloughs are part of the staffing reductions that Delta began implementing in late 2001 after it reduced capacity in response to the significant reduction in traffic following the September 11 terrorist attacks. The Delta-ALPA collective bargaining agreement generally provides that no pilot on the seniority list as of July 1, 2001 will be furloughed unless the furlough is caused by a circumstance beyond Delta’s control, as defined in that agreement. In accordance with the collective bargaining agreement, the grievance was presented to a neutral arbitrator for a decision. In April 2002, the arbitrator denied the grievance, ruling that the pilot furloughs were caused by a circumstance beyond Delta’s control as set out in the collective bargaining agreement. The arbitrator retained jurisdiction of this matter to consider any issues that might arise regarding the Company’s plans to continue the furloughs, or its obligation to implement reasonable mechanisms for recalling furloughed pilots, if the conditions existing as of September 11 are ameliorated to an extent that exceeds Delta’s original expectations. In July 2002, ALPA sent Delta a letter asserting that there should be no further pilot furloughs and that Delta should commence recalling furloughed pilots to active service, based on the foregoing portion of the arbitrator’s ruling. In October 2002, the arbitrator held a hearing to consider ALPA’s claims, but has not yet issued a decision. Delta believes that ALPA’s assertions are without merit.

Change in Independent Public Accountant

         During the March 2002 quarter, we changed independent public accountants. Our new accountants issued a review report for the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements as of September 30, 2002 and for the three months and nine months then ended which is included in this Form 10-Q (page 44). Our prior independent public accountants issued an audit opinion for the Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2001 which is included in our Annual Report (page 55).

46

Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K

(a) Exhibits

10.	Delta’s Executive Life Insurance Program, including forms of agreements entered into as of July 1, 2002 between Delta and each of its officers, including Leo F. Mullin, Frederick W. Reid, M. Michele Burns, Vicki B. Escarra and Robert L. Colman.
12.	Computation of ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed charges.
15.	Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information.
99.	Certification pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code by Delta’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with respect to Delta’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2002.

(b) Reports on Form 8-K

         On July 18, 2002, Delta filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting, under Item 5 — Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, its financial results for the quarter ended June 30, 2002.

         On August 13, 2002, Delta filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting, under Item 9 — Regulation FD Disclosure, that its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer had submitted to the Securities and Exchange Commission sworn statements pursuant to SEC Order No. 4-460 regarding the accuracy of the Company’s financial statements.

         On September 27, 2002, Delta filed a Current Report on Form 8-K reporting, under Item 5 — Other Events and Regulation FD Disclosure, its expected financial performance for the September 2002 quarter, the amendment to one of its letter of credit reimbursement agreements, the early termination of another of its letter of credit reimbursement agreements and the amendment of one of its credit facilities.

47

SIGNATURE

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	Delta Air Lines, Inc. (Registrant)
	By: /s/ M. Michele Burns M. Michele Burns Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
November 13, 2002

48

CERTIFICATIONS

I, Leo F. Mullin, certify that:

         1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2002;

         2.     Based on my knowledge, this Form 10-Q does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Form 10-Q;

         3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Form 10-Q, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Delta as of, and for, the periods presented in this Form 10-Q;

         4.     Delta’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for Delta and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Delta, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Form 10-Q is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of Delta’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”); and

                  (c) presented in this Form 10-Q our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

         5.     Delta’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to Delta’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Delta’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect Delta’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for Delta’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Delta’s internal controls.

49

         6.     Delta’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this Form 10-Q whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 13, 2002 /s/ Leo F. Mullin
Leo F. Mullin
Chairman and
Chief Executive Officer

50

I, M. Michele Burns, certify that:

         1.     I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Delta Air Lines, Inc. for the period ended September 30, 2002;

         2.     Based on my knowledge, this Form 10-Q does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this Form 10-Q;

         3.     Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this Form 10-Q, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of Delta as of, and for, the periods presented in this Form 10-Q;

         4.     Delta’s other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for Delta and have:

                  (a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to Delta, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this Form 10-Q is being prepared;

                  (b) evaluated the effectiveness of Delta’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing of this Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”); and

                  (c) presented in this Form 10-Q our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date.

         5.     Delta’s other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to Delta’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Delta’s Board of Directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

                  (a) all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect Delta’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for Delta’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and

                  (b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in Delta’s internal controls.

51

         6.     Delta’s other certifying officer and I have indicated in this Form 10-Q whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

Date: November 13, 2002 /s/ M. Michele Burns
M. Michele Burns
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer

52

EXHIBIT INDEX

Exhibit No.		Description
	10	Delta’s Executive Life Insurance Program, including forms of agreements entered into as of July 1, 2002, between Delta and each of its officers, including Leo F. Mullin, Frederick W. Reid, M. Michele Burns, Vicki B. Escarra and Robert L. Colman
	12	Computation of ratio of earnings (loss) to fixed charges
	15	Letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP regarding unaudited interim financial information
	99	Certification Pursuant to Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code by Delta’s Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer with respect to Delta’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the Quarter Ended September 30, 2002

EX-10

                                                                      Exhibit 10


                         COLLATERAL ASSIGNMENT AGREEMENT

This Assignment is made and entered into effective as of July 1, 2002, by the
undersigned as the owner (the "Owner") of the Life Insurance Policy Number
         issued by Lincoln Life Insurance Company (the "Insurer"), upon the life
of Owner.

WHEREAS, the Owner is a valued employee of Delta Air Lines, Inc. (the
"Assignee"), a Delaware corporation, or a subsidiary of Assignee, and the
Assignee wishes to assist the Owner in the procurement of life insurance; and

WHEREAS, as an assistance to the Owner's financial ability to procure life
insurance, the Assignee wishes to loan sufficient amounts to pay premiums on the
Policy, as more specifically provided for in that certain Executive Life
Insurance Loan Agreement entered into between the Owner and the Assignee (the
"Agreement"); and

WHEREAS, in consideration of the Assignee agreeing to make the premium payments,
the Owner agrees to grant the Assignee a security interest in the Policy as
collateral security;

NOW, THEREFORE, the Owner hereby assigns, transfers and sets over to the
Assignee the following specific rights in the policy, subject to the following
terms and conditions;

1.    This Assignment is made, and the Policy is to be held, as collateral
security for all liabilities of the Owner to the Assignee, whether now existing
or hereafter arising, pursuant to the terms of the Agreement.

2.    The Assignee's interest in the Policy shall be strictly limited to:

      (a)   The right to be paid the Assignee's portion of the death benefit in
      the event of the death of the insured prior to Owner's termination of
      employment with Employer (as defined in Section 7 of the Executive Loan
      Agreement) in accordance with Section 4 of the Executive Loan Agreement;

      (b)   The right to receive an amount equal to the aggregate premiums
      loaned by the Assignee, or if less, the entire cash surrender value of the
      Policy (which right may be realized by Assignee's borrowing against the
      Policy, withdrawing from the Policy or receiving a portion of the death
      benefit under the Policy), upon Termination of the Executive Loan
      Agreement as defined in Section 7; and

      (c)   The right to receive an amount equal to any federal, state or local
      taxes that Assignee may be required to withhold and collect.

3.    The Owner shall retain all incidents of ownership in the Policy, except as
otherwise limited by the Agreement. The Insurer is only authorized to recognize
(and is fully protected in recognizing) the exercise of any ownership rights by
Owner so long as the instrument by which Owner purports to exercise his
ownership rights is signed by the

Assignee; provided that, the consent of Assignee is not needed if Owner wishes
to change the beneficiary under the Policy. The Insurer shall not be responsible
to ensure that the actions of the Owner conform to the Agreement.

4.    If the Policy is in the possession of the Assignee, the Assignee shall,
upon request, forward the Policy to the Insurer without unreasonable delay, for
endorsement of any designation or change of beneficiary or the exercise of any
other right reserved by the Owner.

5.    (a)   Assignee shall be entitled to exercise its right under the Agreement
      by delivering a notice to Insurer requesting either (1) a withdrawal or
      non recourse policy loan equal to the amount to which Assignee is entitled
      under Section 7 of the Agreement or (2) the payment to the Assignee of
      that portion of the death benefit under the Policy to which the Assignee
      is entitled under Section 4 of the Agreement. So long as the notice is
      also signed by Owner or his beneficiary, Insurer shall pay or loan the
      specified amounts to Assignee without the need for any additional
      documentation.

      (b)   Except to the extent otherwise required by subsection (a), the
      Insurer is hereby authorized to recognize the Assignee's claims to rights
      hereunder without investigating (1) the reason for such action taken by
      the Assignee; (2) the validity or the amount of any of the liabilities of
      the Owner to the Assignee under the Agreement; (3) the existence of any
      default therein; (4) the giving of any notice required herein; or (5) the
      application to be made by the Assignee of any amounts to be paid to the
      Assignee. The receipt of the Assignee for any sums received by it shall be
      a full discharge and release therefor to the Insurer.

6.    Upon the full payment of the liabilities of the Owner to the Assignee
pursuant to the Agreement, the Assignee shall execute an appropriate release of
this Assignment.

7.    The Assignee shall have the right to request of the Insurer and/or the
Owner notice of any action taken with respect to the Policy by the Owner.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Owner has executed this Assignment effective the day and
year first above written.



                                             ___________________________________
                                             Signature of Employee

              DELTA AIR LINES, INC. EXECUTIVE LIFE INSURANCE PLAN
                                 LOAN AGREEMENT

This Agreement is entered into this 1st day of July 2002, by and between Delta
Air Lines, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the "Corporation") and                .
("Employee") in reference to the following facts:

I.    Employee is a valued employee of the Corporation.

II.   The Employee's life is insured under life insurance policy
      number                  (the "Policy") issued by Lincoln Life
      Insurance Company (the "Insurance Company").

III.  The owner of the Policy is the Employee or an insurance trust established
      by the Employee for purposes of personal estate planning.

IV.   The Corporation agrees to loan to the Employee sufficient amounts to pay
      the premiums under the Policy as provided in Section 2 of this Agreement.

V.    The Employee has agreed to assign an interest in the Policy to the
      Corporation as collateral security for the premium payments on a form of
      agreement approved by the Insurance Company (the "Collateral Assignment
      Agreement").

VI.   The parties desire to have a separate agreement outlining their respective
      interests and obligations in the Policy.

NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the facts set forth above and the promises
and covenants set forth below, the parties to this Agreement agree as follows:

1.    OWNERSHIP OF THE POLICY.

      The employee shall be the sole and absolute owner of the Policy, and may
      exercise all ownership rights granted to the owner thereof by the terms of
      the Policy, except as may otherwise be provided herein and in the
      collateral assignment thereof to the Corporation hereunder.
      Notwithstanding the foregoing and any provision hereof to the contrary,
      the Corporation shall, until termination of the Agreement with respect to
      an Employee, under the provisions of Section 7 or 8, have the sole
      authority to direct the manner in which the Policy cash value shall be
      allocated among the various investment options from time to time available
      under the Policy and to change such allocation from time to time, all as
      provided for in the Policy. After the Retirement of the Employee or the
      termination of the Agreement with respect to an Employee under the
      provisions of Sections 7 and 8, the Employee shall thereafter have and may
      exercise all ownership rights in the Policy (subject to the continuing
      collateral assignment thereof to the Company hereunder, if any), including
      but not limited to the authority to direct the allocation of the policy
      cash value among the investment options available under the Policy.

      If required, the Employee will do everything necessary to cause the Policy
      and increases thereon to be issued by the Insurance Company, including
      applications, submission of medical examinations/laboratory tests and
      authorization to release medical information to the Insurance Company.

2.    PREMIUM PAYMENTS.

      The Corporation agrees to loan to the Employee sufficient amounts to pay
      periodic annual premiums on the Policy from time to time in amounts
      sufficient to provide the benefits promised to the Employee's
      beneficiary(ies) under this Agreement. The premiums shall be transmitted
      directly by the Corporation to the Insurance Company no later than 30 days
      following the premium due date.

      Upon termination of this Agreement, in accordance with Section 7(b), the
      Corporation agrees to make any premium adjustments necessary to provide
      the Employee a policy which is projected to remain in effect until it
      matures as a death claim, with no further premium payments, and with a
      projected death benefit equal to two times the Employee's annual rate of
      base salary on the day prior to his or her retirement from the
      Corporation. Such projection will be based on a set of assumptions, with
      such determination as to the assumptions used, at the sole discretion of
      the Corporation.

3.    THE CORPORATION'S SECURITY INTEREST.

      The Corporation's security interest in the Policy is conditioned upon its
      satisfactorily performing all the covenants under this Agreement. The
      Corporation shall not have nor exercise any right in and to the Policy
      which could, in any way, endanger, defeat or impair any of the rights of
      the Employee in the Policy including, by way of illustration, any right to
      collect the proceeds of the Policy in excess of the amount due the
      Corporation as provided in this Agreement and in the Policy. The only
      rights in and to the Policy granted to the Corporation in this Agreement
      shall be limited to the Corporation's security interest in and to the
      Policy cash value equal to its cumulative premium outlays, as defined
      herein, and a portion of the death benefit of the Policy, as hereinafter
      provided (the "Security Interest"). The Corporation shall not assign any
      of its Security Interest to anyone other than the Employee.

4.    DEATH OF THE EMPLOYEE.

      (A)   If the Employee dies while the Policy is in force and this Agreement
      is in effect and prior to the Employee retiring on or after his or her
      attaining age 62, the Employee's designated beneficiary(ies) shall be
      entitled to receive a death benefit payable directly from the proceeds of
      the Policy in an amount equal to two times the Employee's current annual
      rate of base salary on the day preceding his or her death.

      (B)   If the Employee dies while the policy is in force and this Agreement
      is in effect but after his or her retirement on or after age 62, the
      Employee's designated beneficiary(ies) shall be entitled to receive as a
      death benefit payable directly from the

      proceeds of the Policy an amount equal to two times the Employee's annual
      rate of base salary on the day prior to his or her retirement from the
      Corporation.

      (C)   The remaining balance of any Policy proceeds in excess of the above
      amount payable to the Employee's beneficiary(ies) shall be paid to the
      Corporation.

5.    POLICY BENEFICIARY DESIGNATION.

      The rights to designate and change the beneficiary(ies) of the Policy and
      to elect an optional mode of settlement are reserved to the Employee and
      the Corporation with respect to their share of the Policy proceeds as
      determined in Section 4 of this Agreement. Employee's beneficiary
      designation shall be recorded on the appropriate forms provided by the
      Insurance Company.

6.    CORPORATION'S EXERCISE OF RIGHTS AS ASSIGNEE.

      The Corporation, during the lifetime of the Employee and prior to the
      termination of this Agreement, may exercise any of its rights as Assignee
      of the Policy without the consent of the Employee. If a Policy loan is
      made by the Corporation, it shall be responsible for the interest thereon
      and shall pay such interest as it becomes due. However, in no event should
      cumulative loans exceed the amount of premiums paid.

      Subject to the Corporation's rights as Assignee, the Employee retains all
      rights as Owner of the Policy. The Employee agrees not to withdraw,
      surrender, borrow against, or pledge as security for a loan any portion of
      the Policy cash values while this Agreement is in effect.

7.    TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT.

      This Agreement shall terminate upon the occurrence of one of the
      following:

      (A)   Termination of the Employee's employment with the Corporation other
      than on account of the Employee's retirement from the Corporation on or
      after age 62 or other than on account of an approved long term disability,
      as defined in the Corporation's applicable disability plan;

      (B)   The later of: the Employee's retirement from the Corporation on or
      after age 62 and the completion of ten years of full-time employment with
      the Corporation, with such determination as to the number of years to be
      at the sole discretion of the Corporation;

      (C)   Demotion of the Employee to a position which is not eligible for the
      benefits provided by this Agreement;

      (D)   The failure of the Corporation to make the required premium payments
      as provided in Section 2 of this Agreement;

      (E)   Payment to the Corporation by the Employee of the aggregate amount
      of

      premiums paid by the Corporation pursuant to this Agreement;

      (F)   Termination of the Agreement pursuant to Section 8; or

      (G)   The death of the Employee provided the Insurance Company shall pay a
      death benefit to the Employee's beneficiary(ies) in accordance with
      Section 4 of this Agreement.

In the event of termination of this Agreement, the aggregate of the premiums
paid by the Corporation pursuant to this Agreement, less any outstanding policy
loans received by the Corporation prior to such termination, or if less, the net
cash surrender value of the Policy, shall become due and payable to the
Corporation. Upon receiving payment of such amount, whether from the Policy or
from the Employee, the Corporation shall execute a Release of Collateral
Security Assignment and deliver such Release and the Policy to the Employee.

8.    AMENDMENT AND ASSIGNMENT OF AGREEMENT.

      (A)   This Agreement shall not be modified or amended except in writing
      signed by both parties hereto.

      (B)   This Agreement is binding upon the heirs, administrators or assigns
      of each party.

      (C)   This Agreement may be terminated by either party by providing 30
      days written notice to the other.

9.    INSURANCE COMPANY NOT A PARTY.

      The Insurance Company shall not be deemed to be a party to this Agreement
      for any purpose nor shall it be deemed in any way responsible for its
      validity. The Insurance Company shall not be obligated to inquire as to
      the distribution or application of any monies payable or paid by it under
      the Policy, and payments or other performance of its contract obligations
      in accordance with the terms of the Policy shall fully discharge the
      Insurance Company from any and all liability under the Policy.

10.   EMPLOYEE'S REPORTABLE INCOME.

      Each year, the Corporation shall report to the Internal Revenue Service
      and the Employee shall recognize imputed income arising from the economic
      benefit attributable to the Premium Payments described in Section 2 of
      this Agreement.

11.   EMPLOYMENT NOT GUARANTEED.

      Nothing contained in this Agreement nor any action taken hereunder shall
      be construed as a contract of employment or as giving any Employee any
      right to continued employment with the Corporation.

12.   SUCCESSORS.

      This Agreement shall be binding and inure to the benefit of the parties
      and their respective successors, assigns, heirs, and legal
      representatives.

13.   CONTROLLING LAW.

      Except to the extent that is preempted by federal law, this Agreement
      shall be construed, governed and administered in accordance with the laws
      of the State of Georgia.

      IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of
      the day and year first above written.



                                                  ______________________________
                                                  Signature of Employee

                                                  DELTA AIR LINES, INC.

                                                  By: __________________________

                                                  Title: _______________________

EX-12

                                                                      Exhibit 12


DELTA AIR LINES, INC.
STATEMENT REGARDING COMPUTATION OF RATIO OF EARNINGS (LOSS) TO FIXED CHARGES
(IN MILLIONS, EXCEPT RATIOS)

- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------



                                                              Three Months     Three Months      Nine Months      Nine Months
                                                                  Ended            Ended            Ended            Ended
                                                              September 30,    September 30,    September 30,    September 30,
                                                                  2002             2001             2002              2001
                                                              -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------
                                                                                                     
Earnings (loss)
             Loss before income taxes                                $ (527)          $ (408)        $ (1,416)          $ (729)

Add (deduct)
             Fixed charges from below                                   327              294              974              862
             (Income)/loss from equity investees                        (10)               2              (36)              11
             Distributed income of equity investees                      40               70               40               70
             Interest capitalized                                        (4)              (8)             (14)             (27)
                                                              -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------

Earnings (loss) as adjusted                                          $ (174)           $ (50)          $ (452)           $ 187

Fixed charges
             Interest expense                                         $ 169            $ 134            $ 495            $ 381
             Portion of rental expense representative of
               the interest factor                                      158              160              479              481
                                                              -------------    -------------    -------------    -------------

Total fixed charges                                                   $ 327            $ 294            $ 974            $ 862

RATIO OF EARNINGS (LOSS) TO FIXED CHARGES (1)                         (0.53)           (0.17)           (0.46)            0.22

(1)   Fixed charges exceeded our adjusted earnings (loss) by $501 million and $1.4 billion for the three and nine months ended
      September 30, 2002, respectively, and $344 million and $675 million for the three and nine months ended September
      30, 2001, respectively.

EX-15

                                                                      Exhibit 15


November 11, 2002

Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Atlanta, Georgia

We have made a review, in accordance with standards established by the American
Institute of Certified Public Accountants, of the unaudited interim financial
information of Delta Air Lines, Inc. and subsidiaries for the three-month and
nine-month periods ended September 30, 2002, as indicated in our report dated
October 14, 2002; because we did not perform an audit, we expressed no opinion
on that information.

We are aware that our report referred to above, which was included in your
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2002, is being
incorporated by reference in Registration Statement Nos. 2-94541 and 333-65218
on Form S-3 and Registration Statement Nos. 33-30454, 33-65391, 333-16471,
333-46904, 333-48718, 333-49553, 333-73856, and 333-92291 on Form S-8.

We also are aware that the aforementioned report, pursuant to Rule 436(c) under
the Securities Act of 1933, is not considered a part of the Registration
Statements prepared or certified by an accountant or a report prepared or
certified by an accountant within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of that Act.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Atlanta, Georgia

EX-99

                                                                      Exhibit 99


                                                November 13, 2002


Securities and Exchange Commission
450 Fifth Street, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20549

Ladies and Gentlemen:

      The certifications set forth below are hereby submitted to the Securities
and Exchange Commission pursuant to, and solely for the purpose of complying
with, Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code in
connection with the filing on the date hereof with the Securities and Exchange
Commission of the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Delta Air Lines, Inc.
("Delta") for the period ended September 30, 2002 (the "Report").

      Each of the undersigned, the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer and the
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, respectively, of Delta,
hereby certifies that, as of the end of the period covered by the Report:

      1.    such Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of
            the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

      2.    the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all
            material respects, the financial condition and results of operations
            of Delta.


                                                  /s/ Leo F. Mullin
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Name:  Leo F. Mullin
                                                  Chairman and
                                                  Chief Executive Officer


                                                  /s/ M. Michele Burns
                                                  ----------------------------
                                                  Name:  M. Michele Burns
                                                  Executive Vice President and
                                                  Chief Financial Officer