XML 77 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.3.0.814
New Accounting Pronouncements
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
New Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]  
New Accounting Pronouncements

NOTE 20 – NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

In July 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-11, Inventory – Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory, which applies to inventory measured using first-in, first-out or average cost. The guidance in this update states that inventory within scope shall be measured at the lower of cost or net realizable value, and when the net realizable value of inventory is lower than its cost, the difference shall be recognized as a loss in earnings. The new standard is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017 and should be applied on a prospective basis. The Company is evaluating the effect that ASU 2015-11 will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs. The amendments in this Update require that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this Update. ASU 2015-03 will be effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted.  During the second quarter of 2015, we adopted ASU 2015-03 and, as a result, reclassified approximately  $2.9 million of deferred debt issuance costs from deferred charges, net of accumulated amortization to offset against long-term debt on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2014.  As of September 30, 2015, the amount of deferred debt issuance costs was $2.4 million and is included as an offset to current maturities of long-term debt on our Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-05, Customer's Accounting for Fees Paid in a Cloud Computing Arrangement, which provides guidance to customers about whether a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license. If a cloud computing arrangement includes a software license, the customer should account for the software license element of the arrangement consistent with the acquisition of other software licenses. If the arrangement does not include a software license, the customer should account for a cloud computing arrangement as a service contract. The amendment is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. The amendment may be adopted either prospectively to all arrangements entered into or materially modified after the effective date or retrospectively. Management is currently in the process of evaluating the impact of this amendment.

In February 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2015-02, Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis. The amendments in ASU 2015-02 affect reporting entities that are required to evaluate whether they should consolidate certain legal entities. ASU 2015-02 will be effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2015, with early adoption permitted. We do not expect the adoption of ASU 2015-02 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, which will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP.  The guidance in this update requires an entity to recognize the amount of revenue that it expects to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers.  In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14 which deferred the effective date of this standard.  The new standard will apply to us on January 1, 2018, with earlier adoption permitted only as of January 1, 2017. The standard permits the use of either the retrospective or cumulative effect transition method. Management is currently evaluating the effect that ASU 2014-09 will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures and, therefore, has not determined the effect of the accounting guidance on our ongoing financial reporting.

Management reviewed all other significant newly issued accounting pronouncements and concluded that they are either not applicable to our business or that we do not expect their future adoption to have a material effect on our condensed consolidated financial statements.