XML 76 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Derivative Instruments
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Derivative Instruments [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments
Note 14.  Derivative Instruments
 
We use derivative instruments to manage certain foreign currency and interest rate risk exposures. We do not use derivative instruments for speculative trading purposes.  All derivative instruments are recorded on the balance sheet at fair value.  For derivatives designated as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is recorded to other comprehensive income, and is reclassified to earnings when the derivative instrument is settled.  Any ineffective portion of changes in the fair value of the derivative is reported in earnings.  None of our derivative contracts contain credit-risk related contingent features that would require us to settle the contract upon the occurrence of such contingency.  However, all of our contracts contain clauses specifying events of default under specified circumstances, including failure to pay or deliver, breach of agreement, default under the specific agreement to which the hedge relates bankruptcy, misrepresentation and the occurrence of certain transactions.  The remedy for default is settlement in entirety or payment of the fair value of the contracts, which is $8.1 million in the aggregate for all of our contracts, with $390,000 of posted collateral as of June 30, 2012.  The unrealized loss related to our derivative instruments included in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of taxes was $7.7 million as of June 30, 2012 and $8.6 million as of December 31, 2011.

The notional and fair value amounts of our derivative instruments as of June 30, 2012 were as follows:
 
(Amounts in thousands)
 
 
  
Asset Derivatives
  
Liability Derivatives
 
 
 
 
       
 
 
Current Notional
  
Balance Sheet
  
Fair Value
  
Balance Sheet
  
Fair Value
 
   
Amount
  
Location
  
 
  
Location
  
 
 
Interest Rate Swaps - S/T
 $12,145   N/A   -  
Current Liabilities
   (247)
Interest Rate Swaps - L/T*
 $109,162   N/A   N/A  
Other Liabilities
  $(7,826)
Foreign Exchange Contracts
 $900  
Other Current Assets
  $42   N/A   N/A 
Foreign Exchange Contracts
 $3,800   N/A      
Current Liabilities
  $(116)
Total Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
 $126,007   -  $42   -  $(8,190)

*We have outstanding a variable-to-fixed interest rate swap with respect to a Yen-based facility for the financing of a PCTC delivered in March 2010.   The notional amount under this contract is $69,506,745 (based on a Yen to USD exchange rate of 79.81 as of June 30, 2012).  With the bank exercising its option to reduce the underlying Yen loan from 80% to 65% funding of the vessel's delivery cost, the 15% reduction represents the ineffective portion of this swap, which consists of the portion of the derivative instrument that is no longer supported by underlying borrowings.  The change in fair value related to the ineffective portion of this swap was a $117,000 loss for the quarter ended June 30, 2012 and this amount was included in earnings.

In July of 2011, Oslo Bulk, an entity in which we hold a 25% ownership interest and account for under the equity method, entered into an interest rate swap agreement to mitigate is exposure to fluctuating interest rates.  We were unsuccessful in obtaining adequate documentation and reaching a conclusion on the effectiveness of the swap prior to filing both our 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K and Form 10-Q for the first quarter of 2012.  Therefore, we accounted for the swap as if it were ineffective, recognizing the losses incurred in earnings under the caption "Equity in Net (Loss) Income of Unconsolidated Entities."

Oslo's 2011 financial statement audit was completed in the second quarter of 2012 and Oslo Bulk's auditors concluded that the swap did, in fact, meet all of the criteria for hedge accounting at its inception.  As a result of this information, we prior year ineffectiveness of approximately $674,000 during the three months ended June 30, 2012.  Ineffectiveness for the first quarter of 2012 was approximately $42,000.  See Note 17 (Out of Period Adjustments) for further details.

The effect of derivative instruments designated as cash flow hedges on our condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2012 was as follows:
 
 (Amounts in thousands)
 
Net Gain / (Loss)
Recognized in
 Other
 Comprehensive
 Income
  
Location of Gain
 (Loss) Reclassified
 from AOCI to
 Income
  
(Loss)
 Reclassified
 from AOCI to
 Income
  
Gain
Recognized in
 Income from
 Ineffective
 portion
 
   
2012
  
 
  
2012
  
2012
 
Interest Rate Swaps
 $1,236  
Interest Expense
  $(1,723) $32 
Foreign Exchange contracts
 $(180) 
Voyage Expenses
  $(111)  - 
Total
 $1,056   -  $(1,834) $32 
 
Interest Rate Swap Agreements
 
We enter into interest rate swap agreements to manage well-defined interest rate risks. The Company records the fair value of the interest rate swaps as an asset or liability on its balance sheet. Currently, each of our interest rate swaps is accounted for as an effective cash flow hedge.  Accordingly, the effective portion of the change in fair value of the swap is recorded in Other Comprehensive Income.
 
As of June 30, 2012, we had the following swap contracts outstanding:
 
Effective
Date
Termination
Date
 
Current Notional
 Amount
  
Swap Rate
 
Type
11/30/05
11/30/12
  12,145,000   5.17%
Fixed
3/31/08
9/30/13
 $8,551,667   3.46%
Fixed
9/30/10
9/30/13
 $8,551,667   2.69%
Fixed
9/30/10
9/30/13
 $8,551,667   2.45%
Fixed
9/26/05
9/28/15
 $7,000,000   4.41%
Fixed
9/26/05
9/28/15
 $7,000,000   4.41%
Fixed
3/15/09
9/15/20
 $*69,506,745   2.065%
Fixed
Total:
   $121,306,746      
 
  
*Notional amount converted from Yen at June 30, 2012 at a Yen to USD exchange rate of 79.81

Foreign Exchange Rate Risk.
 
We have entered into foreign exchange contracts to hedge certain firm foreign currency purchase commitments.  In 2011, we entered into three forward purchase contracts which expire in 2012. The first was for Mexican Pesos for $1,200,000 U.S. Dollar equivalents at an exchange rate of 12.4717, the second was for Mexican Pesos for $450,000 U.S. Dollar equivalents at an exchange rate of 13.036 and the third was for Mexican Pesos for $750,000 U.S. Dollar equivalents at an exchange rate of 14.0292. In 2012, we entered into three forward purchase contracts which expire in 2013. The first was for Mexican Pesos for $750,000 U.S. Dollar equivalents at an exchange rate of 13.7787, the second was for Mexican Pesos for $250,000 U.S. Dollar equivalents at an exchange rate of 14.2939 and the third was for Mexican Pesos for $700,000 U.S. Dollar equivalents at an exchange rate of 14.5700.  Our Mexican Peso foreign exchange contracts represent approximately 100% of our projected Peso exposure.
 
In May 2012, we entered into a forward purchase contract which expires in 2012. The contract was for Indonesian Rupiah for $2,100,000 U.S. Dollar equivalents at an exchange rate of 9315.  Our Indonesian Rupiah foreign exchange contracts represent approximately 66% of our projected Rupiah exposure.
 
The following table summarizes the notional value of these contracts:
 
(Amounts in Thousands)
          
Transaction Date
 
Type of
 Currency
 
Transaction Amount
 in Dollars
  
Fair Value of
Contracts - Asset
 (Liability)
 
Effective Date
 
Expiration Date
August 2011
 
Peso
 $450,000  $27,245 
September 2011
 
December 2012
September 2011
 
Peso
 $450,000   14,442 
July 2012
 
December 2012
September 2011
 
Peso
 $300,000   (16,006)
October 2011
 
December 2012
May 2012
 
Peso
 $750,000   (6,512)
January 2013
 
May 2013
May 2012
 
Peso
 $250,000   (11,600)
January 2013
 
May 2013
May 2012
 
Peso
 $700,000   (35,979)
June 2013
 
December 2013
May 2012
 
Rupiah
 $1,800,000   (46,312)
July 2012
 
December 2012
      $4,700,000  $(74,722)