10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended July 31, 2011

Commission file no: 1-6458

JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	36-2386361
(State of Incorporation)	(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1 East First Street, Suite 600
Reno, Nevada  89501
(Address of principal executive offices)

Telephone Number:  (775) 786-5527

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes   X   No         

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes   X   No         

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer		Accelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer	X	Smaller reporting company
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes         No    X  

At July 31, 2011, 2,500 shares of common stock, without par value, of the registrant were outstanding, all of which were owned by John Deere Financial Services, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Deere & Company.

The registrant meets the conditions set forth in General Instruction H(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-Q and is therefore filing this Form with certain reduced disclosures as permitted by those instructions.

Index to Exhibits: Page 30

PART I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.     Financial Statements.

John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Statements of Consolidated Income

(Unaudited)

(in millions)

	Three Months Ended				Nine Months Ended
	July 31,				July 31,
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Revenues
Finance income earned on retail notes	$	174.2	$	168.9	$	520.7	$		518.6
Lease revenues	75.2		73.5		220.8		214.0
Revolving charge account income	71.2		70.0		190.7		195.9
Finance income earned on wholesale receivables	74.5		67.3		217.7		189.0
Operating loan income	1.5		2.1		6.4		8.0
Crop insurance commissions			38.5				74.6
Other income - net	17.4		25.3		51.3		72.1
Total revenues	414.0		445.6		1,207.6		1,272.2
Expenses
Interest expense	111.2		123.7		364.1		413.6
Operating expenses:
Administrative and operating expenses	86.6		107.7		241.9		293.2
Provision for credit losses	1.4		21.3		8.2		65.6
Fees paid to John Deere	11.6		8.6		32.2		25.9
Depreciation of equipment on operating leases	48.0		47.0		142.3		137.4
Total operating expenses	147.6		184.6		424.6		522.1
Total expenses	258.8		308.3		788.7		935.7
Income of consolidated group before income taxes	155.2		137.3		418.9		336.5
Provision for income taxes	54.9		48.0		149.6		114.4
Income of consolidated group	100.3		89.3		269.3		222.1
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates	.2		.1		.8		.6
Net income	100.5		89.4		270.1		222.7
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests
Net income attributable to the Company	$	100.5	$	89.4	$	270.1	$	222.7

See Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

2

John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in millions)

	July 31,		October 31,		July 31,
	2011		2010		2010
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	326.0	$	355.7	$	319.1
Receivables:
Retail notes	10,623.7		9,989.3		8,797.7
Retail notes securitized	2,504.5		2,264.9		2,662.6
Revolving charge accounts	2,459.8		2,287.9		2,304.3
Wholesale receivables	5,798.4		4,658.7		5,049.2
Financing leases	450.6		420.4		400.4
Operating loans	113.6		239.1		204.4
Total receivables	21,950.6		19,860.3		19,418.6
Allowance for credit losses	(138.2)		(148.6)		(149.6)
Total receivables – net	21,812.4		19,711.7		19,269.0
Other receivables	33.3		22.3		27.1
Receivable from John Deere	73.9
Equipment on operating leases – net	1,112.4		1,141.8		1,037.7
Notes receivable from John Deere			575.5		595.5
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates	7.9		7.0		6.3
Other assets	590.2		810.5		900.2
Total Assets	$	23,956.1	$	22,624.5	$	22,154.9
Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity
Short-term borrowings:
Commercial paper and other notes payable	$	2,052.0	$	1,349.5	$	722.8
Securitization borrowings	2,380.9		2,208.8		2,577.3
John Deere	1,404.0		1,255.6		914.9
Current maturities of long-term borrowings	4,318.9		2,888.8		3,256.7
Total short-term borrowings	10,155.8		7,702.7		7,471.7
Other payables to John Deere	4.7
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	621.2		694.2		805.6
Deposits withheld from dealers and merchants	161.1		164.8		152.4
Deferred income taxes	211.8		161.7		64.9
Long-term borrowings	10,274.1		11,452.0		11,267.2
Total liabilities	21,428.7		20,175.4		19,761.8
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Stockholder’s equity:
Common stock, without par value (issued and outstanding – 2,500 shares owned by John Deere Financial Services, Inc.)	1,272.8		1,272.8		1,272.8
Retained earnings	1,197.6		1,156.5		1,124.8
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Cumulative translation adjustment	72.6		48.6		25.2
Unrealized loss on derivatives	(16.0)		(29.2)		(30.1)
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	56.6		19.4		(4.9)
Total Company stockholder’s equity	2,527.0		2,448.7		2,392.7
Noncontrolling interests	.4		.4		.4
Total stockholder’s equity	2,527.4		2,449.1		2,393.1
Total Liabilities and Stockholder’s Equity	$	23,956.1	$	22,624.5	$	22,154.9

See Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

3

John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows

For the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2011 and 2010

(Unaudited)

(in millions)

	2011			2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$	270.1		$	222.7
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses	8.2			65.6
Provision for depreciation and amortization	156.3			150.3
Provision (credit) for deferred income taxes	42.9			(9.5		)
Undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	(.8		)	(.6		)
Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses	30.1			15.8
Change in accrued income taxes payable/receivable	10.5			27.2
Other	19.6			216.3
Net cash provided by operating activities	536.9			687.8
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Cost of receivables acquired (excluding wholesale)	(10,039.5		)	(8,819.6		)
Collections of receivables (excluding wholesale)	9,164.6			8,417.0
Increase in wholesale receivables - net	(1,076.2		)	(1,211.5		)
Cost of equipment on operating leases acquired	(450.7		)	(431.5		)
Proceeds from sales of equipment on operating leases	346.6			286.2
Cost of notes receivable with John Deere	(24.5		)	(97.4		)
Collection of notes receivable with John Deere	600.0			241.1
Proceeds from sales of receivables	2.4			17.2
Change in restricted cash	10.1			1.0
Decrease in collateral on derivatives received - net	(52.6		)	(.1		)
Other	(33.7		)	(19.1		)
Net cash used for investing activities	(1,553.5		)	(1,616.7		)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Increase in commercial paper and other notes payable - net	619.6			720.0
Increase (decrease) in securitization borrowings - net	172.0			(531.8		)
Increase in payable to John Deere - net	120.0			910.7
Proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings	2,766.3			1,122.4
Payments of long-term borrowings	(2,442.7		)	(1,698.0		)
Dividends paid	(229.0		)	(130.0		)
Debt issuance costs	(21.2		)	(11.1		)
Net cash provided by financing activities	985.0			382.2
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	1.9			(4.8		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(29.7		)	(551.5		)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	355.7			870.6
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	326.0		$	319.1

See Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

4

John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Statements of Changes in Consolidated Stockholder’s Equity

For the Nine Months Ended July 31, 2010 and 2011

(Unaudited)

(in millions)

				Company Stockholder
	Total Stockholder’s Equity			Common Stock		Retained Earnings			Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Noncontrolling Interests
Balance October 31, 2009	$	2,317.0		$	1,272.8	$	1,032.1		$   11.7	$  .4
Net income	222.7					222.7
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Cumulative translation adjustment	(30.6		)						(30.6)
Unrealized gain on derivatives	14.0								14.0
Comprehensive income	206.1
Dividends paid	(130.0		)			(130.0		)
Balance July 31, 2010	$	2,393.1		$	1,272.8	$	1,124.8		$   (4.9)	$  .4
Balance October 31, 2010	$	2,449.1		$	1,272.8	$	1,156.5		$   19.4	$  .4
Net income	270.1					270.1
Other comprehensive income
Cumulative translation adjustment	24.0								24.0
Unrealized gain on derivatives	13.2								13.2
Comprehensive income	307.3
Dividends paid	(229.0		)			(229.0		)
Balance July 31, 2011	$	2,527.4		$	1,272.8	$	1,197.6		$   56.6	$  .4

See Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements.

5

John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries

Condensed Notes to Interim Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(1)        John Deere Capital Corporation and its subsidiaries (Capital Corporation), and its other consolidated entities are collectively called the Company. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. All adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, have been included. Management believes that the disclosures are adequate to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those to be expected for the fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain items previously reported in specific financial statement captions have been reclassified to conform to the 2011 financial statement presentation. Short-term securitization borrowings have been shown separately from other notes payable on the consolidated balance sheets as a result of the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-17 (see Note 2). The investing activities on the statements of consolidated cash flows have costs and collections related to wholesale receivables presented on a net basis. These receivables have short durations with a high turnover rate. The total cash flows for the investing activities have not changed.

During the first quarter of 2011, the variable interest entity (VIE) created by the Capital Corporation’s parent, John Deere Financial Services, Inc. (JDFS), that serves as a centralized hedging center, was merged into JDFS. As a result, the VIE was deconsolidated with no gains or losses recognized. All of the Capital Corporation’s derivative agreements and transactions outstanding with the VIE at the time of the merger were assumed by JDFS. In conjunction with this merger, the Capital Corporation began utilizing JDFS as a centralized hedging center to execute certain derivative transactions. Further detail regarding the structure of this centralized hedging center can be found in Note 9.

The Company provides and administers financing for retail purchases of new equipment manufactured by Deere & Company’s agriculture and turf and construction and forestry divisions and used equipment taken in trade for this equipment. The Company generally purchases retail installment sales and loan contracts (retail notes) from Deere & Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively called John Deere). John Deere generally acquires these retail notes through John Deere retail dealers. The Company also purchases and finances a limited amount of non-Deere retail notes and continues to service a small portfolio of recreational products and other retail notes. In addition, the Company leases John Deere equipment and a limited amount of non-Deere equipment to retail customers (financing and operating leases). The Company also finances and services revolving charge accounts, in most cases acquired from and offered through merchants in the agriculture and turf and construction and forestry markets (revolving charge accounts). The Company also provides wholesale financing for inventories of John Deere agriculture and turf and construction and forestry equipment owned by dealers of those products (wholesale receivables). Further, the Company finances and services operating loans, in most cases offered through and acquired from farm input providers or through direct relationships with agricultural producers or agribusinesses (operating loans). The Company also offers credit enhanced international export financing to select customers and dealers which generally involves John Deere products. Retail notes, revolving charge accounts, operating loans, financing leases and wholesale receivables are collectively called “Receivables.” Receivables and operating leases are collectively called “Receivables and Leases.”

6

(2)New accounting standards adopted in the first nine months of  2011 were as follows:

In the first quarter of 2011, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2009-16, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, which amends Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 860, Transfers and Servicing (FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140). This ASU eliminates the qualifying special purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and clarifies the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. It requires additional disclosures about the risks from continuing involvement in transferred financial assets accounted for as sales. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In the first quarter of 2011, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, which amends ASC 810, Consolidation (FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)). This ASU requires a qualitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The analysis identifies the primary beneficiary as the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE. The ASU also requires additional disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement in a VIE. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In the first quarter of 2011, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, which amends ASC 310, Receivables. This ASU requires disclosures related to receivables and the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment. The ASU also requires disclosures of information regarding the credit quality, aging, nonaccrual status and impairments by class of receivable. A portfolio segment is the level at which a creditor develops a systematic methodology for determining its credit allowance. A receivable class is a subdivision of a portfolio segment with similar measurement attributes, risk characteristics and common methods to monitor and assess credit risk. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

New accounting standards to be adopted are as follows:

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This ASU requires disclosures of transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2, more detailed roll forward reconciliations of Level 3 recurring fair value measurements on a gross basis, fair value information by class of assets and liabilities, and descriptions of valuation techniques and inputs for Level 2 and Level 3 measurements. The effective date was the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 except for the roll forward reconciliations, which are required in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. The adoption in 2010 did not have a material effect and the future adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, which amends ASC 310, Receivables. This ASU states that a troubled debt restructuring occurs when a creditor grants a concession it would not otherwise consider to a debtor that is experiencing financial difficulties. The guidance clarifies what would be considered a concession by the creditor and financial difficulties of the debtor. Certain disclosures are required for transactions that qualify as troubled debt restructurings. The effective date will be the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011. The adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

7

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, which amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. This ASU also requires the categorization by level for items that are only required to be disclosed at fair value and information about transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. In addition, the ASU provides guidance on measuring the fair value of financial instruments managed within a portfolio and the application of premiums and discounts on fair value measurements. The ASU requires additional disclosure for Level 3 measurements regarding the sensitivity of fair value to changes in unobservable inputs and any interrelationships between those inputs. The effective date will be the second quarter of fiscal year 2012. The adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends ASC 220, Comprehensive Income. The ASU requires the presentation of total comprehensive income, total net income and the components of net income and comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either presentation, adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income must be shown on the face of the financial statements. The other comprehensive income items may be shown net of tax effects with the taxes disclosed in a note, or pretax with the total taxes presented in one amount. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2013 and must be applied retrospectively. The adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

(3)        Comprehensive income, which includes all changes in total stockholder’s equity during the period except transactions with the stockholder, was as follows (in millions of dollars):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	July 31,						July 31,
	2011			2010			2011		2010
Net income	$	100.5		$	89.4		$	270.1	$	222.7
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Cumulative translation adjustment	(8.2		)	(4.0		)	24.0		(30.6		)
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives	3.6			(7.9		)	13.2		14.0
Comprehensive income	$	95.9		$	77.5		$	307.3	$	206.1

(4)        Past due balances of Receivables represent the total balance held (principal plus accrued interest) with any payment amounts 30 days or more past the contractual payment due date.

Generally, when retail notes are approximately 120 days delinquent, accrual of finance income is suspended, the collateral is repossessed or the account is designated for litigation and the estimated uncollectible amount, after charging the dealer’s withholding account, if any, is written off to the allowance for credit losses. Revolving charge accounts are deemed to be uncollectible and written off to the allowance for credit losses when delinquency reaches 120 days for a John Deere Financial Multi-use account (formerly known as Farm Planä), PowerPlanâ or John Deere Financial Revolving Plan account. When a financing lease account becomes 120 days delinquent, the accrual of lease revenue is suspended, the equipment is repossessed or the account is designated for litigation, and the estimated uncollectible amount, after charging the dealer’s withholding account, if any, is written off to the allowance for credit losses. Generally, when a wholesale receivable becomes 60 days delinquent, the Company determines whether the accrual of finance income on interest-bearing wholesale receivables should be suspended, the collateral should be repossessed or the account should be designated for litigation and the estimated uncollectible amount written off to the allowance for credit losses. Finance income for non-performing Receivables is recognized on a cash basis. Accrual of finance income is resumed when the receivable becomes contractually current and collections are reasonably assured.

The Company monitors the credit quality of Receivables as either performing or non-performing monthly. Non-performing Receivables represent loans for which the Company has ceased accruing finance income.

8

An aging of total Receivables and non-performing Receivables was as follows (in millions of dollars):

	July 31, 2011
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due *		Total Past Due
Retail notes:
Agriculture and turf equipment	$	76.4	$	58.2	$	21.2	$	155.8
Construction and forestry equipment	47.3		23.5		12.8		83.6
Recreational products	.1		.1				.2
Revolving charge accounts:
Agriculture and turf equipment	15.5		6.3		8.0		29.8
Construction and forestry equipment	2.0		.8		.3		3.1
Wholesale receivables:
Agriculture and turf equipment	1.3		.5		.6		2.4
Construction and forestry equipment	.6		.2		.2		1.0
Financing leases:
Agriculture and turf equipment	7.2		2.9		11.6		21.7
Construction and forestry equipment	2.4		.9		3.7		7.0
Operating loans:
Agriculture and turf equipment
Total Receivables	$	152.8	$	93.4	$	58.4	$	304.6

*              Receivables that are 90 days or greater past due and still accruing finance income.

	Total Past Due		Total Non- Performing		Current		Total Receivables
Retail notes:
Agriculture and turf equipment	$	155.8	$	45.6	$	11,789.5	$	11,990.9
Construction and forestry equipment	83.6		19.1		1,030.8		1,133.5
Recreational products	.2		.1		3.5		3.8
Revolving charge accounts:
Agriculture and turf equipment	29.8		.9		2,370.5		2,401.2
Construction and forestry equipment	3.1				55.5		58.6
Wholesale receivables:
Agriculture and turf equipment	2.4		1.1		5,000.7		5,004.2
Construction and forestry equipment	1.0				793.2		794.2
Financing leases:
Agriculture and turf equipment	21.7		12.5		277.2		311.4
Construction and forestry equipment	7.0		4.5		127.7		139.2
Operating loans:
Agriculture and turf equipment			2.4		111.2		113.6
Total Receivables	$	304.6	$	86.2	$	21,559.8	$	21,950.6

9

Allowance for credit losses on Receivables are maintained in amounts considered to be appropriate in relation to the Receivables outstanding based on collection experience, economic conditions and credit risk quality.

An analysis of the allowance for credit losses on Receivables was as follows (in millions of dollars):

	Three Months Ended
	July 31, 2011
	Retail Notes			Revolving Charge Accounts			Wholesale Receivables			Other			Total Receivables
Allowance:
Balance, beginning of the period	$	81.8		$	43.3		$	6.1		$	14.2		$	145.4
Provision (credit) for credit losses	(5.5		)	3.2			(.1		)	3.8			1.4
Write-offs	(2.9		)	(11.3		)				(1.8		)	(16.0		)
Recoveries	.7			6.3			.1			.4			7.5
Other changes *	(.1		)										(.1		)
Balance, end of the period	$	74.0		$	41.5		$	6.1		$	16.6		$	138.2

	Nine Months Ended
	July 31, 2011
	Retail Notes			Revolving Charge Accounts			Wholesale Receivables			Other			Total Receivables
Allowance:
Balance, beginning of the period	$	82.1		$	43.3		$	7.4		$	15.8		$	148.6
Provision (credit) for credit losses	(2.2		)	7.5			(1.4		)	4.3			8.2
Write-offs	(12.3		)	(29.7		)	(.3		)	(4.3		)	(46.6		)
Recoveries	6.0			20.4			.1			.6			27.1
Other changes *	.4						.3			.2			.9
Balance, end of the period	$	74.0		$	41.5		$	6.1		$	16.6		$	138.2
Balance individually evaluated	$	.6					$	.3		$	2.1		$	3.0
Balance collectively evaluated	$	73.4		$	41.5		$	5.8		$	14.5		$	135.2
Receivables:
Balance, end of the period	$	13,128.2		$	2,459.8		$	5,798.4		$	564.2		$	21,950.6
Balance individually evaluated	$	16.3		$	.4		$	.3		$	6.5		$	23.5
Balance collectively evaluated	$	13,111.9		$	2,459.4		$	5,798.1		$	557.7		$	21,927.1

*         Primarily translation adjustments

Receivables are considered impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms. Receivables reviewed for impairment generally include those that are either past due, or have provided bankruptcy notification, or require significant collection efforts. Receivables, which are impaired, are classified as non-performing.

10

An analysis of  impaired Receivables was as follows (in millions of dollars):

				July 31, 2011
				Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		Average Recorded Investment
	Receivables with specific allowance: *
	Retail notes			$	1.3	$	1.3	$	.6	$	1.3
	Revolving charge accounts
	Wholesale receivables			.3		.3		.3		1.0
	Financing leases			1.1		.9		.4		1.2
	Operating loans			2.3		2.3		1.7		3.7
	Total			5.0		4.8		3.0		7.2
	Receivables without specific allowance:
	Retail notes			11.6		11.3				10.1
	Total			$	16.6	$	16.1	$	3.0	$	17.3
	Agriculture and turf			$	10.3	$	10.1	$	2.6	$	11.6
	Construction and forestry			$	6.3	$	6.0	$	.4	$	5.7
		*            Finance income recognized was not material.
(5)			Securitization of receivables:
			The Company, as a part of its overall funding strategy, periodically transfers certain receivables (retail notes) into VIEs that are special purpose entities (SPEs), or a non-VIE banking operation, as part of its asset-backed securities programs (securitizations). The structure of these transactions is such that the transfer of the retail notes does not meet the criteria of sales of receivables, and is, therefore, accounted for as a secured borrowing. SPEs utilized in securitizations of retail notes differ from other entities included in the Company’s consolidated statements because the assets they hold are legally isolated. Use of the assets held by the SPEs or the non-VIE is restricted by terms of the documents governing the securitization transactions.
			In securitizations of retail notes related to secured borrowings, the retail notes are transferred to certain SPEs or to a non-VIE banking operation, which in turn issue debt to investors. The resulting secured borrowings are recorded as “Securitization borrowings” on the balance sheet. The securitized retail notes are recorded as “Retail notes securitized” on the balance sheet. The total restricted assets on the balance sheet related to these securitizations include the retail notes securitized less an allowance for credit losses, and other assets primarily representing restricted cash. For those securitizations in which retail notes are transferred into SPEs, the SPEs supporting the secured borrowings are consolidated unless the Company does not have both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the SPEs’ economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the SPEs. No additional support to these SPEs beyond what was previously contractually required has been provided during the reporting periods.
			In certain securitizations, the Company consolidates the SPEs since it has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the SPEs’ economic performance, through its role as servicer of all the Receivables held by the SPEs, and the obligation, through variable interests in the SPEs, to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the SPEs. The restricted assets (retail notes securitized, allowance for credit losses and other assets) of the consolidated SPEs totaled $1,746 million, $1,739 million and $1,850 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The liabilities (securitization borrowings and accounts payable and accrued expenses) of these SPEs totaled $1,622 million, $1,654 million and $1,765 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The credit holders of these SPEs do not have legal recourse to the Company’s general credit.

11

In certain securitizations, the Company transfers retail notes to a non-VIE bank operation, which is not consolidated since the Company does not have a controlling interest in the entity. The Company’s carrying values and interests related to these securitizations with the unconsolidated non-VIE were restricted assets (retail notes securitized, allowance for credit losses and other assets) of $205 million and liabilities (securitization borrowings and accounts payable and accrued expenses) of $190 million at July 31, 2011.
In certain securitizations, the Company transfers retail notes into bank-sponsored, multi-seller, commercial paper conduits, which are SPEs that are not consolidated. The Company does not service a significant portion of the conduits’ receivables, and, therefore, does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the conduits’ economic performance. These conduits provide a funding source to the Company (as well as other transferors into the conduit) as they fund the retail notes through the issuance of commercial paper. The Company’s carrying values and variable interests related to these conduits were restricted assets (retail notes securitized, allowance for credit losses and other assets) of $613 million, $589 million and $877 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The liabilities (securitization borrowings and accounts payable and accrued expenses) related to these conduits were $570 million, $557 million and $815 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively.
The Company’s carrying amount of the liabilities to the unconsolidated conduits, compared to the maximum exposure to loss related to these conduits, which would only be incurred in the event of a complete loss on the restricted assets was as follows (in millions of dollars):
	July 31,
	2011
Carrying value of liabilities	$	570
Maximum exposure to loss		613
The total assets of unconsolidated VIEs related to securitizations were approximately $22 billion at July 31, 2011.
The components of consolidated restricted assets related to secured borrowings in securitization transactions were as follows (in millions of dollars):
			July 31, 2011			October 31, 2010			July 31, 2010
Retail notes securitized			$	2,504.5		$	2,264.9		$	2,662.6
Allowance for credit losses			(23.9		)	(26.6		)	(30.8		)
Other assets			83.2			90.0			95.1
Total restricted securitized assets			$	2,563.8		$	2,328.3		$	2,726.9
The components of consolidated secured borrowings and other liabilities related to securitizations were as follows (in millions of dollars):
			July 31, 2011			October 31, 2010			July 31, 2010
Securitization borrowings			$	2,380.9		$	2,208.8		$	2,577.3
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			1.4			1.8			2.2
Total liabilities related to restricted securitized assets			$	2,382.3		$	2,210.6		$	2,579.5
The secured borrowings related to these restricted retail notes are obligations that are payable as the retail notes are liquidated. Repayment of the secured borrowings depends primarily on cash flows generated by the restricted assets. Due to the Company’s short-term credit rating, cash collections from these restricted assets are not required to be placed into a restricted collection account until immediately prior to the time payment is required to the secured creditors. At July 31, 2011, the maximum remaining term of all restricted receivables was approximately six years.

12

(6)	Commitments and contingencies:
	At July 31, 2011, John Deere Credit Inc., the John Deere finance subsidiary in Canada, had $410 million of commercial paper, $1,766 million of medium-term notes outstanding, and a fair value liability of $10 million for derivatives, prior to considering applicable netting provisions, with a notional amount of $973 million that were guaranteed by the Company.
	The Company has commitments to extend credit to customers and John Deere dealers through lines of credit and other pre-approved credit arrangements. The Company applies the same credit policies and approval process for these commitments to extend credit as it does for its Receivables. Collateral is not required for these commitments, but if credit is extended, collateral may be required upon funding. The amount of unused commitments to extend credit to John Deere dealers was $3.1 billion at July 31, 2011. The amount of unused commitments to extend credit to customers was $31.8 billion at July 31, 2011. A significant portion of these commitments is not expected to be fully drawn upon; therefore, the total commitment amounts likely do not represent a future cash requirement. The Company generally has the right to unconditionally cancel, alter or amend the terms of these commitments at any time. Over 95 percent of these unused commitments to extend credit to customers relate to revolving charge accounts.
	At July 31, 2011, the Company had restricted other assets of $8 million. See Note 5 for additional restricted assets associated with borrowings related to securitizations.
	The Company also had other miscellaneous contingent liabilities totaling approximately $1 million at July 31, 2011, for which it believes the probability for payment is substantially remote. The accrued liability for these contingencies was not material at July 31, 2011.
(7)	The fair values of financial instruments that do not approximate the carrying values were as follows (in millions of dollars):
		July 31, 2011		October 31, 2010		July 31, 2010
		Carrying Value	Fair Value	Carrying Value	Fair Value	Carrying Value	Fair Value
Receivables financed – net		$ 19,331	$ 19,330	$ 17,474	$ 17,509	$ 16,637	$ 16,673
Retail notes securitized – net		2,481	2,486	2,238	2,257	2,632	2,650
Securitization borrowings		2,381	2,394	2,209	2,229	2,577	2,600
Long-term borrowings due within one year		4,319	4,371	2,889	2,922	3,257	3,284
Long-term borrowings		10,274	10,641	11,452	11,952	11,267	11,733
	Fair values of the long-term Receivables were based on the discounted values of their related cash flows at current market interest rates. The fair values of the remaining Receivables approximated the carrying amounts.
	Fair values of long-term borrowings and short-term securitization borrowings were based on current market quotes for identical or similar borrowings and credit risk, or on the discounted values of their related cash flows at current market interest rates. Certain long-term borrowings have been swapped to current variable interest rates. The carrying values of these long-term borrowings included adjustments related to fair value hedges.

13

(8)	Assets and liabilities measured at fair value as Level 2 measurements on a recurring basis were as follows (in millions of dollars):
						July 31,				October 31,				July 31,
						2011				2010				2010
	Receivables from John Deere
	Derivatives:
	Interest rate contracts					$	73.8
	Cross-currency interest rate contracts					.1
	Other assets
	Derivatives:
	Interest rate contracts					279.4				$	454.3			$	501.1
	Foreign exchange contracts					.4				4.0				.9
	Cross-currency interest rate contracts					1.0				2.9				4.4
	Total assets *					$	354.7			$	461.2			$	506.4
	Other payables to John Deere
	Derivatives:
	Interest rate contracts					$	2.6
	Cross-currency interest rate contracts					2.1
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses
	Derivatives:
	Interest rate contracts					5.3				$	31.2			$	45.4
	Foreign exchange contracts					23.2				4.5				15.7
	Cross-currency interest rate contracts					8.6				48.2				95.7
	Total liabilities					$	41.8			$	83.9			$	156.8
	*      Excluded from this table are the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, which are carried at par value or amortized cost approximating fair value. The cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds.
	Fair value, nonrecurring, Level 3 measurements were as follows (in millions of dollars):
		Fair Value *										Losses
												Nine Months Ended
		July 31,		October 31,				July 31,				July 31,
		2011		2010				2010				2011				2010
	Receivables:
	Retail notes	$	.7	$	1.7			$	1.6			$	.1			$	.4
	Wholesale receivables			16.9				18.9								3.4
	Financing leases	.7		.2				.4				.3				.2
	Operating loans	.6		1.1				.7
	Total Receivables	$	2.0	$	19.9			$	21.6			$	.4			$	4.0
	*   Does not include cost to sell.
	Level 1 measurements consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2 measurements include significant other observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets; observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves; and other market-corroborated inputs. Level 3 measurements include significant unobservable inputs. There were no assets or liabilities valued using Level 1 measurements at July 31, 2011.
	Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market and income approaches. The Company utilizes valuation models and techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs. The models are industry-standard models that consider various assumptions including time values and yield curves as well as other economic measures. These valuation techniques are consistently applied.

14

	The following is a description of the valuation methodologies the Company uses to measure financial instruments at fair value:
	Derivatives – The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of interest rate swaps and caps, foreign currency forwards and swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps. The portfolio is valued based on an income approach (discounted cash flow) using market observable inputs, including swap curves and both forward and spot exchange rates for currencies.
	Receivables – Specific reserve impairments are based on the fair value of the collateral, which is measured using an income approach (discounted cash flow) or a market approach (appraisal values or realizable values). Inputs include interest rates and selection of realizable values.
(9)	It is the Company’s policy that derivative transactions are executed only to manage exposures arising in the normal course of business and not for the purpose of creating speculative positions or trading. The Company manages the relationship of the types and amounts of its funding sources to its receivable and lease portfolio in an effort to diminish risk due to interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations, while responding to favorable financing opportunities. The Company also has foreign currency exposures at some of its foreign and domestic operations related to financing in currencies other than the functional currencies.
	All derivatives are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet. Each derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, a fair value hedge, or remains undesignated. All designated hedges are formally documented as to the relationship with the hedged item as well as the risk-management strategy. Both at inception and on an ongoing basis the hedging instrument is assessed as to its effectiveness, when applicable. If and when a derivative is determined not to be highly effective as a hedge, or the underlying hedged transaction is no longer likely to occur, or the hedge designation is removed, or the derivative is terminated, hedge accounting is discontinued. Any past or future changes in the derivative’s fair value, which will not be effective as an offset to the income effects of the item being hedged, are recognized currently in the income statement.
	The majority of the Company’s outstanding derivatives have been transacted directly between the Company and unrelated external counterparties. However, beginning in the first quarter of 2011, for certain derivatives the Company began utilizing a centralized hedging center structure in which John Deere enters into a derivative transaction with an unrelated external counterparty and simultaneously enters into a derivative transaction with the Company. Except for collateral provisions, the terms of the transaction between the Company and John Deere are identical to the terms of the transaction between John Deere and its unrelated external counterparty.
	Certain of the Company’s derivative agreements executed directly with unrelated external counterparties contain credit support provisions that require the Company to post collateral based on reductions in credit ratings. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 was none, $16 million and $34 million, respectively. The Company, due to its credit rating, has not posted any collateral. If the credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered, the Company would be required to post full collateral for this liability position, prior to considering applicable netting provisions.

15

Derivative instruments are subject to significant concentrations of credit risk to the banking sector. The Company manages individual unrelated external counterparties by setting limits that consider the credit rating of the unrelated external counterparty and the size of other financial commitments and exposures between the Company and the unrelated external counterparty banks. All interest rate derivatives are transacted under International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) documentation. Some of these agreements executed with unrelated external counterparties include collateral support arrangements. Each master agreement executed with an unrelated external counterparty permits the net settlement of amounts owed in the event of early termination. The maximum amount of loss that the Company would incur on derivatives transacted directly with unrelated external counterparties,  if the counterparties to those derivative transactions fail to meet their obligations, not considering collateral received or netting arrangements, was $281 million, $461 million and $506 million as of July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The amount of collateral received from unrelated external counterparties at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 to offset this potential maximum loss was $33 million, $85 million and $78 million, respectively. The netting provisions of the agreements would reduce the maximum amount of loss the Company would incur if the unrelated external counterparties to derivative instruments fail to meet their obligations by an additional $7 million, $52 million and $88 million as of July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. None of the concentrations of risk with any individual unrelated external counterparty was considered significant in any periods presented.

The Company also has ISDA agreements with John Deere that permit the net settlement of amounts owed between counterparties in the event of early termination. In addition, the Company has agreed to absorb any losses and expenses John Deere incurs if an unrelated external counterparty fails to meet its obligations on a derivative transaction that John Deere entered into to manage exposures of the Company.  The maximum amount of loss that the Company would incur on derivatives transacted with John Deere if the unrelated external counterparty would fail to meet its obligations, considering both the netting arrangements as well as the loss sharing agreement, was $71 million as of July 31, 2011.

Cash flow hedges

Certain interest rate and cross-currency interest rate contracts (swaps) were designated as hedges of future cash flows from borrowings. The total notional amounts of the receive-variable/pay-fixed interest rate contracts at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 were $350 million, $1,060 million and $1,430 million, respectively. The notional amount of cross-currency interest rate contracts at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 was $853 million, $849 million and $849 million, respectively. The effective portions of the fair value gains or losses on these cash flow hedges were recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI) and subsequently reclassified into interest expense or administrative and operating expenses (foreign exchange) in the same periods during which the hedged transactions affected earnings. These amounts offset the effects of interest rate or foreign currency exchange rate changes on the related borrowings. Any ineffective portions of the gains or losses on all interest rate contracts designated as cash flow hedges were recognized currently in interest expense or administrative and operating expenses (foreign exchange) and were not material during any periods presented. The cash flows from these contracts were recorded in operating activities in the statements of consolidated cash flows.

The amount of loss recorded in OCI at July 31, 2011 that is expected to be reclassified to interest expense or administrative and operating expenses in the next twelve months if interest rates or exchange rates remain unchanged is approximately $4 million after-tax. These contracts mature in up to 30 months. There were no gains or losses reclassified from OCI to earnings based on the probability that the original forecasted transaction would not occur.

16

Fair value hedges

Certain interest rate contracts (swaps) were designated as fair value hedges of borrowings. The total notional amounts of these receive-fixed/pay-variable interest rate contracts at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 were $6,730 million, $5,979 million and $6,462 million, respectively. The effective portions of the fair value gains or losses on these contracts were offset by fair value gains or losses on the hedged items (fixed-rate borrowings). Any ineffective portions of the gains or losses were recognized currently in interest expense. The ineffective portions were a gain of $2 million and none during the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and a loss of $1 million and none during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The cash flows from these contracts were recorded in operating activities in the statements of consolidated cash flows.

The gains (losses) on these contracts and the underlying borrowings recorded in interest expense were as follows (in millions of dollars):

	Three Months Ended July 31,						Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Interest rate contracts *	$	93.6		$	114.4		$	(30.5	)	$	103.6
Borrowings **	(91.3		)	(114.5		)	29.1			(103.4		)

*         Includes changes in fair value of interest rate contracts excluding net accrued interest income of $39.2 million and $50.1 million during the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 and $120.7 million and $161.4 million during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

**       Includes adjustments for fair values of hedged borrowings excluding accrued interest expense of $62.1 million and $77.2 million during the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 and $186.1 million and $237.1 million during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

The Company has certain interest rate contracts (swaps and caps), foreign exchange contracts (forwards and swaps) and cross-currency interest rate contracts (swaps), which were not formally designated as hedges. These derivatives were held as economic hedges for underlying interest rate or foreign currency exposures primarily for certain borrowings. The total notional amounts of these interest rate swaps at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 were $2,109 million, $2,009 million and $2,348 million, the foreign exchange contracts were $1,054 million, $1,000 million and $1,034 million and the cross-currency interest rate contracts were $49 million, $60 million and $58 million, respectively. At July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 there were also $1,052 million, $1,055 million and $1,135 million, respectively, of interest rate caps purchased and the same amounts sold at the same capped interest rate to facilitate borrowings through securitization of retail notes. The fair value gains or losses from the interest rate contracts were recognized currently in interest expense and the gains or losses from foreign exchange contracts in administrative and operating expenses, generally offsetting over time the expenses on the exposures being hedged. The cash flows from these non-designated contracts were recorded in operating activities in the statements of consolidated cash flows.

17

Fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets were as follows (in millions of dollars):

	July 31, 2011		October 31, 2010		July 31, 2010
Receivables from John Deere
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	$	71.9
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	.1
Total designated	72.0
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	1.9
Other Assets
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	252.6		$	418.0	$	463.7
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	26.8		36.3		37.4
Foreign exchange contracts	.4		4.0		.9
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	1.0		2.9		4.4
Total not designated	28.2		43.2		42.7
Total derivatives	$	354.7	$	461.2	$	506.4
Other Payables to John Deere
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	$	.8
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	1.8
Total designated	2.6
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	1.8
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	.3
Total not designated	2.1
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts			$	17.5	$	26.8
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	5.8		46.9		95.1
Total designated	5.8		64.4		121.9
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	5.3		13.7		18.6
Foreign exchange contracts	23.2		4.5		15.7
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	2.8		1.3		.6
Total not designated	31.3		19.5		34.9
Total derivatives	$	41.8	$	83.9	$	156.8

18

The classification and gains (losses), which include accrued interest expense, related to derivative instruments on the statements of consolidated income consisted of the following (in millions of dollars):

	Expense or OCI	Three Months Ended July 31				Nine Months Ended July 31
	Classification	2011		2010		2011		2010
Fair Value Hedges:
Interest rate contracts	Interest expense	$	132.8	$	164.5	$	90.2	$	265.0
Cash Flow Hedges:
Recognized in OCI
(Effective Portion):
Interest rate contracts	OCI (pretax) *	(1.9)		(5.9)		(4.8)		(12.1)
Foreign exchange contracts	OCI (pretax) *	(19.4)		(38.4)		34.3		(90.5)
Reclassified from OCI
(Effective Portion):
Interest rate contracts	Interest expense *	(3.1)		(18.5)		(18.4)		(57.8)
Foreign exchange contracts	Administrative and operating expenses *	(23.9)		(13.6)		27.4		(66.1)
Recognized Directly in Income
(Ineffective Portion):
Interest rate contracts	Interest expense	**		**		**		**
Foreign exchange contracts	Administrative and operating expenses	**		**		**		**
Not Designated as Hedges:
Interest rate contracts	Interest expense *	$	4.3	$	11.3	$	(.3)	$	11.4
Foreign exchange contracts	Administrative and operating expenses *	(5.7)		22.3		(108.3)		(8.0)
Total		$	(1.4)	$	33.6	$	(108.6)	$	3.4

*Includes interest and foreign exchange gains (losses) from cross-currency interest rate contracts.

**The amount is not significant.

Included in the above table are interest expense and administrative and operating expense amounts the Company incurred on derivatives transacted with John Deere. The amount of gain the Company recognized on these affiliate party transactions for the three months and nine months ended July 31, 2011 was $81 million and $98 million, respectively. As referenced in the VIE section of Note 1, during the first quarter of 2011 the centralized hedging center VIE that was previously consolidated into the Company’s financial statements was merged into JDFS and thus deconsolidated from the Company. Due to this merger having occurred in January 2011, the affiliate party interest expense amounts referenced above relate only to activity that took place between the merger date and July 31, 2011.

(10)          The Company is a participating employer in certain Deere & Company sponsored defined benefit pension plans for employees in the U.S. and certain defined benefit pension plans outside the U.S. These pension plans provide for benefits that are based primarily on years of service and employee compensation. Pension expense is actuarially determined based on the Company’s employees included in the plan. The Company’s pension expense amounted to $4.1 million in the first nine months of 2011. The accumulated benefit obligation and plan net assets for the employees of the Company are not determined separately from Deere & Company. The Company generally provides defined benefit health care and life insurance plans for retired employees in the U.S. as a participating employer in Deere & Company’s sponsored plans. Health care and life insurance benefits expense is actuarially determined based on the Company’s employees included in the plans and amounted to $6.1 million during the first nine months of 2011. Further disclosure for these plans is included in Deere & Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2011.

19

Item 2.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Results of Operations

Overview

Organization

The Company primarily generates revenues and cash by financing John Deere dealers’ sales and leases of new and used agriculture, turf, construction and forestry equipment. In addition, the Company provides wholesale financing to dealers of the foregoing equipment, finances retail revolving charge accounts and provides operating loans.

Trends and Economic Conditions

The Company’s business is closely related to John Deere’s business. Industry farm machinery sales in the U.S. and Canada for 2011 are forecast to be up 5 to 10 percent for the year. Overall conditions remain positive and demand continues to be strong, especially for high horsepower equipment. Industry sales of farm machinery in the EU 27 nations of Western and Central Europe are forecast to increase by 10 to 15 percent, while sales in the Commonwealth of Independent States are expected to be notably higher. Sales in Asia are forecast to rise sharply again this year. In South America, industry sales are projected to be down about 5 percent, compared with the strong levels of 2010. Industry sales of turf and utility equipment in the U.S. and Canada are expected to be about the same as last year. John Deere’s agriculture and turf segment sales increased 22 percent for the third quarter and 23 percent for the first nine months of 2011. These sales are forecast to increase by about 21 percent for the full year with a positive foreign currency translation impact of about 4 percent. U.S. construction equipment markets reflect somewhat improved conditions in relation to last year’s low level and increased activity outside the U.S. and Canada. Worldwide forestry markets are experiencing a further rebound after last year’s strong gains, with particular improvement in Europe. John Deere’s construction and forestry sales were up 34 percent in the third quarter and 50 percent in the first nine months of 2011.  These sales are forecast to increase by about 45 percent for the year. 

Net income attributable to the Company in fiscal year 2011 is forecast to increase to approximately $355 million, compared to $319 million in fiscal year 2010. The forecast increase from 2010 is primarily due to growth in the portfolio and a lower provision for credit losses, partially offset by narrower financing spreads.

Items of concern for the Company include the uncertainty of the global economic recovery, the impact of sovereign and state debt, capital market disruptions, the availability of credit for John Deere’s and the Company’s customers, the effectiveness of governmental actions in respect to monetary policies, general economic conditions and financial regulatory reform. Significant volatility in the price of many commodities could also impact John Deere’s and the Company’s results. Concerns over the health of the global economy and turmoil in world financial markets have introduced additional uncertainty into the near term outlook. 

2011 Compared with 2010

Net income attributable to the Company was $100.5 million for the third quarter and $270.1 million for the first nine months of 2011, compared with $89.4 million and $222.7 million for the same periods last year. Results were higher for both periods primarily due to growth in the portfolio and a lower provision for credit losses, partially offset by narrower financing spreads.

20

Revenues totaled $414.0 million for the third quarter and $1,207.6 million for the first nine months of 2011, compared with $445.6 million and $1,272.2 million for the same periods last year. The decreases were primarily due to lower crop insurance commissions. In August 2010, the Company sold John Deere Risk Protection, the crop insurance managing general agency, to JDFS. Finance income earned on retail notes totaled $520.7 million for the first nine months of 2011, compared with $518.6 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to a 12 percent increase in the average balance of retail notes, partially offset by lower average financing rates. Lease revenues totaled $220.8 million in the first nine months of 2011, compared with $214.0 million in the first nine months of 2010. The increase was primarily due to an 11 percent increase in the average balance of leases, partially offset by lower average financing rates. Revenues earned on revolving charge accounts amounted to $190.7 million in the first nine months of 2011, compared with $195.9 million during the same period last year. The decrease was primarily due to lower average financing rates. Finance income earned on wholesale receivables totaled $217.7 million for the first nine months of 2011, compared to $189.0 million for the same period in 2010. The increase was primarily due to an 18 percent increase in the average balance of wholesale receivables. Revenues earned from John Deere totaled $89.2 million for the third quarter and $293.5 million for the first nine months of 2011, compared to $116.4 million and $336.7 million for the same periods last year.

Interest expense totaled $111.2 million for the third quarter and $364.1 million for the first nine months of 2011, compared with $123.7 million and $413.6 million for the same periods in 2010. The decreases were due to lower average interest rates, partially offset by higher average borrowings.

Administrative and operating expenses were $86.6 million in the third quarter and $241.9 million for the first nine months of 2011, compared with $107.7 million and $293.2 million for the same periods in 2010. The decreases were primarily due to lower crop insurance commission expenses.

During the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, the provision for credit losses totaled $1.4 million and $8.2 million, respectively, compared with $21.3 million and $65.6 million for the same periods in 2010. The decrease for the quarter was primarily due to a decrease in allowance for credit losses and lower write-offs of revolving charge accounts. The year-to-date decrease was primarily due to lower write-offs of construction and forestry equipment retail notes, revolving charge accounts, and operating loans. The annualized provision for credit losses, as a percentage of the average balance of total Receivables financed, was .03 percent for the third quarter and .05 percent for the nine months of 2011, compared with .45 percent and .48 percent for the same periods in 2010. See the Company’s most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K for further information regarding the Company’s allowance for credit losses policies.

The Company’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 2.38 to 1 for the third quarter of 2011, compared with 2.10 to 1 for the third quarter of 2010. The Company’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges was 2.14 to 1 for the first nine months of 2011, compared with 1.81 to 1 for the first nine months of 2010. “Earnings” consist of income before income taxes, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting and fixed charges excluding unamortized capitalized interest. “Fixed charges” consist of interest on indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, interest related to uncertain tax positions, an estimated amount of rental expense that is deemed to be representative of the interest factor, and capitalized interest.

21

Receivable and Lease acquisition volumes were as follows (in millions of dollars):

	Three Months
	Ended July 31,
	2011		2010		$ Change		% Change
Retail notes:
Agriculture and turf equipment	$	1,590.8	$	1,440.7	$	150.1	10	%
Construction and forestry equipment	179.5		151.3		28.2		19
Total retail notes	1,770.3		1,592.0		178.3		11
Revolving charge accounts	1,294.0		1,232.7		61.3		5
Wholesale receivables	6,852.7		5,835.3		1,017.4		17
Financing leases	66.5		75.4		(8.9)		(12	)
Operating loans	23.5		67.2		(43.7)		(65	)
Equipment on operating leases	147.1		184.9		(37.8)		(20	)
Total Receivables and Leases	$	10,154.1	$	8,987.5	$	1,166.6	13	%
	Nine Months
	Ended July 31,
	2011		2010		$ Change		% Change
Retail notes:
Agriculture and turf equipment	$	5,098.9	$	4,502.3	$	596.6	13%
Construction and forestry equipment	539.5		420.6		118.9		28
Total retail notes	5,638.4		4,922.9		715.5		15
Revolving charge accounts	3,931.9		3,532.2		399.7		11
Wholesale receivables	21,627.2		16,187.3		5,439.9		34
Financing leases	178.1		157.6		20.5		13
Operating loans	291.1		206.9		84.2		41
Equipment on operating leases	450.7		431.5		19.2		4
Total Receivables and Leases	$	32,117.4	$	25,438.4	$	6,679.0	26%

Retail note volumes increased in the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, when compared to last year, primarily due to increases in retail sales of John Deere equipment. Revolving charge account volumes increased during the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, when compared to last year, primarily due to increased market share. Wholesale receivable volumes increased during the third quarter and first nine months of 2011, when compared to last year, due to increased shipments of John Deere equipment as a result of increased retail sales activity.

Total Receivables and Leases held were as follows (in millions of dollars):

	July 31,		October 31,		July 31,
	2011		2010		2010
Retail notes:
Agriculture and turf equipment	$	11,990.9	$	11,111.3	$	10,282.5
Construction and forestry equipment	1,133.5		1,138.3		1,172.8
Recreational products	3.8		4.6		5.0
Total retail notes	13,128.2		12,254.2		11,460.3
Revolving charge accounts	2,459.8		2,287.9		2,304.3
Wholesale receivables	5,798.4		4,658.7		5,049.2
Financing leases	450.6		420.4		400.4
Operating loans	113.6		239.1		204.4
Equipment on operating leases	1,112.4		1,141.8		1,037.7
Total Receivables and Leases	$	23,063.0	$	21,002.1	$	20,456.3

22

Receivables and Leases administered by the Company were as follows (in millions of dollars):

	July 31,		October 31,		July 31,
	2011		2010		2010
Receivables and Leases administered:
Owned by the Company	$	20,558.5	$	18,737.2	$	17,793.7
Owned by the Company – securitized	2,504.5		2,264.9		2,662.6
Total Receivables and Leases owned by the Company	23,063.0		21,002.1		20,456.3
Administered – with limited recourse*	34.9		59.6		66.9
Administered – without recourse**	13.2		20.6		22.8
Total Receivables and Leases administered	$	23,111.1	$	21,082.3	$	20,546.0

*

The Company’s maximum exposure under all Receivable and Lease recourse provisions at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 was $4 million, $5 million, and $6 million, respectively. The Company does not record the recourse obligations as liabilities as they are contingent liabilities that are remote at this time. However, the probable loss on Receivables and Leases that have been sold was accrued at the time of sale, and any subsequent necessary adjustments are made as part of ongoing reviews.

**

Represents Receivables and Leases that the Company has sold but continues to administer for a fee.

Total Receivables balance 30 days or more past due, which continue to accrue finance income, were $305 million, $327 million and $369 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The total Receivables balance 30 days or more past due as a percentage of the ending Receivables balance was 1.39 percent, 1.65 percent and 1.90 percent at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. Total non-performing Receivables, which represent loans for which the Company has ceased accruing finance income, were $86 million, $120 million and $132 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The total non-performing Receivables as a percentage of the ending Receivables balance was .39 percent, .61 percent and .68 percent at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. See Note 4 to the consolidated financial statements for additional information.

23

Total Receivable write-off amounts, net of recoveries, by product, and as an annualized percentage of average balances held during the period, were as follows (in millions of dollars):

	Three Months Ended					Three Months Ended
	July 31,					July 31,
	2011					2010
	Dollars			Percent		Dollars			Percent
Retail notes:
Agriculture and turf equipment	$	.9		.03	%	$	(.4	)	(.02	)%
Construction and forestry equipment	1.4			.50		(.2		)	(.07	)
Recreational products	(.1		)	(10.21	)	.1			7.71
Total retail notes	2.2			.07		(.5		)	(.02	)
Revolving charge accounts	5.0			.84		15.9			2.87
Wholesale receivables	(.1		)	(.01	)	(.1		)	(.01	)
Financing leases	1.0			.91		(.4		)	(.41	)
Operating loans	.4			1.05		.9			1.74
Total Receivables	$	8.5		.16	%	$	15.8		.33	%

	Nine Months Ended					Nine Months Ended
	July 31,					July 31,
	2011					2010
	Dollars			Percent		Dollars			Percent
Retail notes:
Agriculture and turf equipment	$	1.1		.01	%	$	2.2		.03	%
Construction and forestry equipment	5.3			.63		17.1			1.82
Recreational products	(.1		)	(3.03	)	.1			2.34
Total retail notes	6.3			.07		19.4			.23
Revolving charge accounts	9.3			.59		37.7			2.48
Wholesale receivables	.2			.01		(1.4		)	(.04	)
Financing leases	2.3			.73		1.5			.52
Operating loans	1.4			.93		16.5			9.59
Total Receivables	$	19.5		.13	%	$	73.7		.54	%

Deposits withheld from dealers and merchants, representing mainly the aggregate dealer retail note and lease withholding accounts from individual John Deere dealers to which losses from retail notes and leases originating from the respective dealers can be charged, amounted to $161 million at July 31, 2011, compared with $165 million at October 31, 2010 and $152 million at July 31, 2010.

The Company’s allowance for credit losses on all Receivables financed totaled $138 million at July 31, 2011, $149 million at October 31, 2010 and $150 million at July 31, 2010. The allowance for credit losses represented .63 percent of the total Receivables financed at July 31, 2011, .75 percent at October 31, 2010 and .77 percent at July 31, 2010. The level of the allowance is based on many quantitative and qualitative factors, including historical loss experience by product category, portfolio duration, delinquency trends, economic conditions and credit risk quality. The Company believes its allowance is sufficient to provide for losses in its existing receivable portfolio.

24

Safe Harbor Statement

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: Statements under “Overview” and other forward-looking statements herein that relate to future events, expectations, trends and operating periods involve certain factors that are subject to change, and important risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially.

Factors that could materially affect the Company’s operations, access to capital, expenses and results include changing worldwide economic conditions, and changes in and the impact of governmental trade, banking, monetary and fiscal policies, including financial regulatory reform and its effects on the consumer finance industry, derivatives, funding costs and other areas. Actions by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board and other central banks and regulators may affect the costs and expenses of financing the Company and the financing rates it is able to offer. The Company’s business is affected by general economic conditions in and the political stability of the global markets in which the Company operates because deteriorating economic conditions and political instability can result in decreased customer confidence, lower demand for equipment, higher credit losses and greater currency risk. The Company’s business is also affected by actions of banks, financing and leasing companies and other lenders that compete with the Company for customers; capital market disruptions; significant changes in capital market liquidity and associated funding costs; interest rates; and foreign currency exchange rates and their volatility.

Significant changes in market liquidity conditions and any failure to comply with financial covenants in credit agreements could impact access to funding and funding costs, which could reduce the Company’s earnings and cash flows. Financial market conditions could also negatively impact customer access to capital for purchases of John Deere’s products and customer confidence and purchase decisions; borrowings and repayment practices; and the number and size of customer loan delinquencies and defaults. A sovereign debt crisis, in Europe or elsewhere, could continue to negatively impact currencies, global financial markets, social and political stability, funding sources and costs, customers, and Company operations and results. State debt crises also could negatively impact customers, demand for equipment, and Company operations and results. The Company’s operations could be impaired by changes in the equity and bond markets, which would negatively affect earnings.

The liquidity and ongoing profitability of the Company depends largely on timely access to capital to meet future cash flow requirements and fund operations and the costs associated with engaging in diversified funding activities. If market uncertainty increases and general economic conditions worsen, funding could be unavailable or insufficient. Additionally, customer confidence levels may result in declines in credit applications and increases in delinquencies and default rates, which could materially impact the Company’s write-offs and provision for credit losses.

In addition, the Company’s business is closely related to John Deere’s business. Further information, including factors that potentially could materially affect the Company’s and John Deere’s financial results, is included in the most recent Deere & Company Form 10-K and Form 10-Q (including, but not limited to, the factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors of the Form 10-K and quarterly report on Form 10-Q) and other Deere & Company and Capital Corporation filings with the SEC.

Critical Accounting Policies

See the Company’s critical accounting policies discussed in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of the most recent annual report filed on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes to these policies.

Capital Resources and Liquidity

For additional information on the Company’s dependence on and relationships with Deere & Company, see the Company’s most recently filed annual report on Form 10-K.

25

During the first nine months of 2011, the aggregate net cash provided by financing and operating activities was used primarily to increase Receivables. Net cash provided by operating activities was $537 million in the first nine months of 2011. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $985 million in the first nine months of 2011, resulting primarily from a net increase in total external borrowings, partially offset by dividends paid to JDFS, which in turn paid comparable dividends to Deere & Company. Net cash used for investing activities totaled $1,554 million in the first nine months of 2011, primarily due to the increase in wholesale receivables and the cost of the other receivables and leases acquired (excluding wholesale) exceeding collections of these receivables and proceeds from sales of equipment on operating leases, partially offset by collections of notes receivable with John Deere exceeding the cost of notes receivable with John Deere. In December 2010, John Deere sold its wind energy business and, as a result, John Deere Renewables, LLC repaid all outstanding loans to the Company. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $30 million during the first nine months of 2011.

During the first nine months of 2010, the aggregate net cash provided by the beginning balance of cash and cash equivalents, operating and financing activities was used primarily to increase Receivables. Net cash provided by operating activities was $688 million in the first nine months of 2010. Net cash provided by financing activities totaled $382 million in the first nine months of 2010, resulting primarily from an increase in payables to John Deere, partially offset by a net decrease in total external borrowings and dividends paid to JDFS, which in turn paid comparable dividends to Deere & Company. Net cash used for investing activities totaled $1,617 million in the first nine months of 2010, primarily due to the increase in wholesale receivables and the cost of the other receivables and leases acquired (excluding wholesale) exceeding collections of these receivables and proceeds from sales of equipment on operating leases, partially offset by collections of notes receivable with John Deere exceeding the cost of notes receivable with John Deere. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $552 million during the first nine months of 2010.

The Company relies on its ability to raise substantial amounts of funds to finance its Receivable and Lease portfolios. Given the continued uncertainty in the global economy, there has been a reduction in liquidity in some global markets that continues to affect the funding activities of the Company. However, the Company has access to most global markets at a reasonable cost and expects to have sufficient sources of global funding and liquidity to meet its funding needs. The Company’s ability to meet its debt obligations is supported in a number of ways. The assets of the Company are self-liquidating in nature. A solid equity position is available to absorb unusual losses on these assets and all commercial paper is backed by unsecured, committed borrowing lines from various banks. Liquidity is also provided by the Company’s ability to securitize these assets and through the issuance of term debt. Additionally, liquidity may be provided through loans from John Deere. The Company’s commercial paper outstanding at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 was $2,051 million, $1,349 million and $712 million, respectively, while the total cash and cash equivalents position was $326 million, $356 million and $319 million, respectively.

During November 2010, the Capital Corporation renewed a revolving credit agreement to utilize bank conduit facilities to securitize retail notes (see Note 5). At July 31, 2011, this facility had a total capacity, or “financing limit,” of up to $2,000 million of secured financings at any time. After a three-year revolving period, unless the banks and Capital Corporation agree to renew, Capital Corporation would liquidate the secured borrowings over time as payments on the retail notes are collected. At July 31, 2011, $760 million of securitization borrowings was outstanding under the agreement.

During the first nine months of 2011, the Company issued $2,728 million of medium-term notes, obtained $1,457 million of securitization borrowings and maintained an average commercial paper balance of $1,737 million. At July 31, 2011, the Company’s funding profile included $2,051 million of commercial paper, $2,381 million of securitization borrowings, $1,404 million of intercompany loans from John Deere, $14,593 million of unsecured term debt, and $2,527 million of equity capital. The Company’s funding profile may be altered to reflect such factors as relative costs of funding sources, assets available for securitizations and capital market accessibility.

In April 2011, the Company entered into a $1,106 million retail note securitization transaction. During the first nine months of 2011, the Company also issued $2,766 million and retired $2,443 million of long-term borrowings, which were primarily medium-term notes.

Total interest-bearing indebtedness amounted to $20,430 million at July 31, 2011, compared with $19,155 million at October 31, 2010, and $18,739 million at July 31, 2010. Total short-term indebtedness amounted to $10,156 million at July 31, 2011, compared with $7,703 million at October 31, 2010, and $7,472 million at July 31, 2010. Total long-term indebtedness amounted to $10,274 million at July 31, 2011, compared with $11,452 million at October 31, 2010, and $11,267 million at July 31, 2010. The ratio of total interest-bearing debt, including securitization indebtedness, to stockholder’s equity was 8.1 to 1 at July 31, 2011, compared with 7.8 to 1 at October 31, 2010 and 7.8 to 1 at July 31, 2010.

26

Stockholder’s equity was $2,527 million at July 31, 2011, compared with $2,449 million at October 31, 2010 and $2,393 million at July 31, 2010. The increase in the first nine months of 2011 resulted primarily from net income attributable to the Company of $270 million, an increase in cumulative translation adjustment of $24 million and a $13 million unrealized gain on derivatives, partially offset by dividend payments of $229 million.

Lines of Credit

Capital Corporation also has access to bank lines of credit with various banks throughout the world. Some of the lines are available to both Capital Corporation and Deere & Company. Worldwide lines of credit totaled $5,001 million at July 31, 2011, $2,170 million of which was unused. For the purpose of computing unused credit lines, commercial paper and short-term bank borrowings, excluding securitization borrowings and the current portion of long-term borrowings, of the Capital Corporation and Deere & Company were considered to constitute utilization. Included in the total credit lines at July 31, 2011 was a long-term credit facility agreement of $2,750 million, expiring in April 2015 and a long-term credit facility agreement of $1,500 million, expiring in April 2013. The credit agreements require the Capital Corporation to maintain its consolidated ratio of earnings to fixed charges at not less than 1.05 to 1 for each fiscal quarter and its ratio of senior debt, excluding securitization indebtedness, to capital base (total subordinated debt and total stockholder’s equity excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)) at not more than 11 to 1 at the end of any fiscal quarter. All of these requirements of the credit agreements have been met during the periods included in the consolidated financial statements.

Debt Ratings

The Company’s ability to obtain funding is affected by its debt ratings, which are closely related to the outlook for and the financial condition of John Deere, and the nature and availability of support facilities, such as its lines of credit and the support agreement from Deere & Company.

To access public debt capital markets, the Company relies on credit rating agencies to assign short-term and long-term credit ratings to the Company’s securities as an indicator of credit quality for fixed income investors. A credit rating agency may change or withdraw Company ratings based on its assessment of the Company’s current and future ability to meet interest and principal repayment obligations. Each agency’s rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Lower credit ratings generally result in higher borrowing costs, including costs of derivative transactions, and reduced access to debt capital markets.

The senior long-term and short-term debt ratings and outlook currently assigned to unsecured Company debt securities by the rating agencies engaged by the Company are the same as those for John Deere. Those ratings are as follows:

	Senior Long-Term	Short-Term	Outlook
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.	A2	Prime-1	Stable
Standard & Poor’s	A	A-1	Stable

Dividends and Other Events

The Capital Corporation declared and paid cash dividends to JDFS of $229 million in the first nine months of fiscal 2011. In turn, JDFS paid comparable dividends to Deere & Company.  On September 1, 2011, the Capital Corporation declared a $65 million dividend, to be paid to JDFS on October 19, 2011. JDFS, in turn, declared a $65 million dividend to Deere & Company, also payable on October 19, 2011.

During August 2011, the Company issued $500 million of medium-term notes with a fixed rate of 1.85% due in September 2016, which were swapped to a variable interest rate of .95% at date of issuance.

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.
	See the Company’s most recent annual report filed on Form 10-K (Part II, Item 7A). There has been no material change in this information.

27

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures.

The Company’s principal executive officer and its principal financial officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (Act)) were effective as of July 31, 2011, based on the evaluation of these controls and procedures required by Rule 13a-15(b) or 15d-15(b) of the Act. During the third quarter, there were no changes that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

PART II.  OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings.
	The Company is subject to various unresolved legal actions which arise in the normal course of its business, the most prevalent of which relate to state and federal laws and regulations concerning retail credit. Although it is not possible to predict with certainty the outcome of these unresolved legal actions or the range of possible loss, the Company believes these unresolved legal actions will not have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements.
Item 1A.	Risk Factors.
	See the Company’s most recent annual report on Form 10-K (Part I, Item 1A) and the subsequent quarterly reports filed on Form 10-Q (Part II, Item 1A). There has been no material change in this information. The risks described in the annual report on Form 10-K, the quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and in Item 1A and the “Safe Harbor Statement” in this report are not the only risks faced by the Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to the Company or that are currently judged to be immaterial may also materially affect the Company’s business, financial condition or operating results.
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.
	Omitted pursuant to instruction H.
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities.
	Omitted pursuant to instruction H.
Item 5.	Other Information.
	None.
Item 6.	Exhibits.
	See the index to exhibits immediately preceding the exhibits filed with this report.
	Certain instruments relating to long-term debt, constituting less than 10% of the registrant’s total assets, are not filed as exhibits herewith pursuant to Item 601(b)(4)(iii)(A) of Regulation S-K.  The registrant will file copies of such instruments upon request of the SEC.

28

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

		JOHN DEERE CAPITAL CORPORATION
Date:	September 1, 2011	By:	/s/ J. M. Field
			J. M. Field Senior Vice President, Principal Financial Officer

29

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

Exhibit
3.1	Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (Exhibit 3.1 to Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended October 31, 1999, Securities and Exchange Commission file number 1-6458*)
3.2	Bylaws, as amended (Exhibit 3.2 to Form 10-K of the registrant for the year ended October 31, 1999, Securities and Exchange Commission file number 1-6458*)
12	Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
31.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
31.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification
32	Section 1350 Certifications
99	Part I of Deere & Company Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2011
	(Securities and Exchange Commission file number 1-4121*)
101	Interactive Data File

*Incorporated by reference.  Copies of these exhibits are available from the Company upon request.

30

EX-12

Exhibit 12

John Deere Capital Corporation and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
(millions of dollars)

	Nine Months Ended July 31,				For the Years Ended October 31,
	2011		2010		2010		2009		2008		2007		2006
Earnings:
Income of consolidated group before income taxes	$	418.9	$	336.5	$	477.9	$	221.9	$	437.1	$	479.6	$	442.7
Fixed charges excluding capitalized interest	366.9		416.8		537.7		793.6		843.4		882.0		732.2
Total earnings	$	785.8	$	753.3	$	1,015.6	$	1,015.5	$	1,280.5	$	1,361.6	$	1,174.9
Fixed charges:
Interest expense of consolidated group including capitalized interest	$	364.2	$	413.6	$	533.6	$	789.6	$	839.1	$	877.9	$	726.9
Rent expense	2.7		3.2		4.1		5.0		4.8		4.1		5.3
Total fixed charges	$	366.9	$	416.8	$	537.7	$	794.6	$	843.9	$	882.0	$	732.2
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges	2.14		1.81		1.89		1.28		1.52		1.54		1.60

The computation of the ratio of earnings to fixed charges is based on applicable amounts of the Company plus dividends received from unconsolidated affiliates. “Earnings” consist of income before income taxes, the cumulative effect of changes in accounting and fixed charges excluding unamortized capitalized interest.  “Fixed charges” consist of interest on indebtedness, amortization of debt discount and expense, interest related to uncertain tax positions, an estimated amount of rental expense that is deemed to be representative of the interest factor, and capitalized interest.

The Company has not issued preferred stock. Therefore, the ratios of earnings to combined fixed charges and preferred stock dividends are the same as the ratios presented above.

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATIONS

I, S. R. Allen, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of John Deere Capital Corporation;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	September 1, 2011	By:	/s/ S. R. Allen
			S. R. Allen
			Principal Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATIONS

I, J. M. Field, certify that:

1.	I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of John Deere Capital Corporation;
2.	Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;
3.	Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;
4.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) for the registrant and have:
	a)	Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;
	b)	Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;
	c)	Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and
	d)	Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and
5.	The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):
	a)	All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and
	b)	Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date:	September 1, 2011	By:	/s/ J. M. Field
			J. M. Field
			Principal Financial Officer

EX-32

EXHIBIT 32

STATEMENT PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350
AS REQUIRED BY
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Quarterly Report of John Deere Capital Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending July 31, 2011, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), the undersigned hereby certify that to the best of our knowledge:

1.	The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
2.	The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

September 1, 2011	/s/ S. R. Allen	Chairman and Principal Executive Officer
	S. R. Allen
September 1, 2011	/s/ J. M. Field	Senior Vice President and Principal Financial Officer
	J. M. Field

A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to John Deere Capital Corporation and will be retained by John Deere Capital Corporation and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

XML



Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical)	Jul. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2010	Jul. 31, 2010
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Common stock, issued shares	2,500	2,500	2,500
Common stock, outstanding shares	2,500	2,500	2,500

XML



Statements of Consolidated Cash Flows (USD $) In Millions	9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2010
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:
Net income	$ 270.1	$ 222.7
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses	8.2	65.6
Provision for depreciation and amortization	156.3	150.3
Provision (credit) for deferred income taxes	42.9	(9.5)
Undistributed earnings of unconsolidated affiliates	(0.8)	(0.6)
Change in accounts payable and accrued expenses	30.1	15.8
Change in accrued income taxes payable/receivable	10.5	27.2
Other	19.6	216.3
Net cash provided by operating activities	536.9	687.8
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:
Cost of receivables acquired (excluding wholesale)	(10,039.5)	(8,819.6)
Collections of receivables (excluding wholesale)	9,164.6	8,417.0
Increase in wholesale receivables - net	(1,076.2)	(1,211.5)
Cost of equipment on operating leases acquired	(450.7)	(431.5)
Proceeds from sales of equipment on operating leases	346.6	286.2
Cost of notes receivable with John Deere	(24.5)	(97.4)
Collection of notes receivable with John Deere	600.0	241.1
Proceeds from sales of receivables	2.4	17.2
Change in restricted cash	10.1	1.0
Decrease in collateral on derivatives received - net	(52.6)	(0.1)
Other	(33.7)	(19.1)
Net cash used for investing activities	(1,553.5)	(1,616.7)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:
Increase in commercial paper and other notes payable - net	619.6	720.0
Increase (decrease) in securitization borrowings - net	172.0	(531.8)
Increase in payable to John Deere - net	120.0	910.7
Proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings	2,766.3	1,122.4
Payments of long-term borrowings	(2,442.7)	(1,698.0)
Dividends paid	(229.0)	(130.0)
Debt issuance costs	(21.2)	(11.1)
Net cash provided by financing activities	985.0	382.2
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents	1.9	(4.8)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(29.7)	(551.5)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	355.7	870.6
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$ 326.0	$ 319.1

XML



Statements of Consolidated Income (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2010	Jul. 31, 2011	Jul. 31, 2010
Revenues
Finance income earned on retail notes	$ 174.2	$ 168.9	$ 520.7	$ 518.6
Lease revenues	75.2	73.5	220.8	214.0
Revolving charge account income	71.2	70.0	190.7	195.9
Finance income earned on wholesale receivables	74.5	67.3	217.7	189.0
Operating loan income	1.5	2.1	6.4	8.0
Crop insurance commissions		38.5		74.6
Other income - net	17.4	25.3	51.3	72.1
Total revenues	414.0	445.6	1,207.6	1,272.2
Expenses
Interest expense	111.2	123.7	364.1	413.6
Operating expenses:
Administrative and operating expenses	86.6	107.7	241.9	293.2
Provision for credit losses	1.4	21.3	8.2	65.6
Fees paid to John Deere	11.6	8.6	32.2	25.9
Depreciation of equipment on operating leases	48.0	47.0	142.3	137.4
Total operating expenses	147.6	184.6	424.6	522.1
Total expenses	258.8	308.3	788.7	935.7
Income of consolidated group before income taxes	155.2	137.3	418.9	336.5
Provision for income taxes	54.9	48.0	149.6	114.4
Income of consolidated group	100.3	89.3	269.3	222.1
Equity in income of unconsolidated affiliates	0.2	0.1	0.8	0.6
Net income	100.5	89.4	270.1	222.7
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests		0
Net income attributable to the Company	$ 100.5	$ 89.4	$ 270.1	$ 222.7

XML



FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

(7)	The fair values of financial instruments that do not approximate the carrying values were as follows (in millions of dollars):
		July 31, 2011		October 31, 2010		July 31, 2010
		Carrying Value	Fair Value	Carrying Value	Fair Value	Carrying Value	Fair Value
Receivables financed – net		$ 19,331	$ 19,330	$ 17,474	$ 17,509	$ 16,637	$ 16,673
Retail notes securitized – net		2,481	2,486	2,238	2,257	2,632	2,650
Securitization borrowings		2,381	2,394	2,209	2,229	2,577	2,600
Long-term borrowings due within one year		4,319	4,371	2,889	2,922	3,257	3,284
Long-term borrowings		10,274	10,641	11,452	11,952	11,267	11,733
	Fair values of the long-term Receivables were based on the discounted values of their related cash flows at current market interest rates. The fair values of the remaining Receivables approximated the carrying amounts.
	Fair values of long-term borrowings and short-term securitization borrowings were based on current market quotes for identical or similar borrowings and credit risk, or on the discounted values of their related cash flows at current market interest rates. Certain long-term borrowings have been swapped to current variable interest rates. The carrying values of these long-term borrowings included adjustments related to fair value hedges.

XML



COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(3)        Comprehensive income, which includes all changes in total stockholder’s equity during the period except transactions with the stockholder, was as follows (in millions of dollars):

	Three Months Ended						Nine Months Ended
	July 31,						July 31,
	2011			2010			2011		2010
Net income	$	100.5		$	89.4		$	270.1	$	222.7
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Cumulative translation adjustment	(8.2		)	(4.0		)	24.0		(30.6		)
Unrealized gain (loss) on derivatives	3.6			(7.9		)	13.2		14.0
Comprehensive income	$	95.9		$	77.5		$	307.3	$	206.1

XML



DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

(9)	It is the Company’s policy that derivative transactions are executed only to manage exposures arising in the normal course of business and not for the purpose of creating speculative positions or trading. The Company manages the relationship of the types and amounts of its funding sources to its receivable and lease portfolio in an effort to diminish risk due to interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations, while responding to favorable financing opportunities. The Company also has foreign currency exposures at some of its foreign and domestic operations related to financing in currencies other than the functional currencies.
	All derivatives are recorded at fair value on the balance sheet. Each derivative is designated as a cash flow hedge, a fair value hedge, or remains undesignated. All designated hedges are formally documented as to the relationship with the hedged item as well as the risk-management strategy. Both at inception and on an ongoing basis the hedging instrument is assessed as to its effectiveness, when applicable. If and when a derivative is determined not to be highly effective as a hedge, or the underlying hedged transaction is no longer likely to occur, or the hedge designation is removed, or the derivative is terminated, hedge accounting is discontinued. Any past or future changes in the derivative’s fair value, which will not be effective as an offset to the income effects of the item being hedged, are recognized currently in the income statement.
	The majority of the Company’s outstanding derivatives have been transacted directly between the Company and unrelated external counterparties. However, beginning in the first quarter of 2011, for certain derivatives the Company began utilizing a centralized hedging center structure in which John Deere enters into a derivative transaction with an unrelated external counterparty and simultaneously enters into a derivative transaction with the Company. Except for collateral provisions, the terms of the transaction between the Company and John Deere are identical to the terms of the transaction between John Deere and its unrelated external counterparty.
	Certain of the Company’s derivative agreements executed directly with unrelated external counterparties contain credit support provisions that require the Company to post collateral based on reductions in credit ratings. The aggregate fair value of all derivatives with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a liability position at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 was none, $16 million and $34 million, respectively. The Company, due to its credit rating, has not posted any collateral. If the credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered, the Company would be required to post full collateral for this liability position, prior to considering applicable netting provisions.

Derivative instruments are subject to significant concentrations of credit risk to the banking sector. The Company manages individual unrelated external counterparties by setting limits that consider the credit rating of the unrelated external counterparty and the size of other financial commitments and exposures between the Company and the unrelated external counterparty banks. All interest rate derivatives are transacted under International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) documentation. Some of these agreements executed with unrelated external counterparties include collateral support arrangements. Each master agreement executed with an unrelated external counterparty permits the net settlement of amounts owed in the event of early termination. The maximum amount of loss that the Company would incur on derivatives transacted directly with unrelated external counterparties,  if the counterparties to those derivative transactions fail to meet their obligations, not considering collateral received or netting arrangements, was $281 million, $461 million and $506 million as of July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The amount of collateral received from unrelated external counterparties at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 to offset this potential maximum loss was $33 million, $85 million and $78 million, respectively. The netting provisions of the agreements would reduce the maximum amount of loss the Company would incur if the unrelated external counterparties to derivative instruments fail to meet their obligations by an additional $7 million, $52 million and $88 million as of July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. None of the concentrations of risk with any individual unrelated external counterparty was considered significant in any periods presented.

The Company also has ISDA agreements with John Deere that permit the net settlement of amounts owed between counterparties in the event of early termination. In addition, the Company has agreed to absorb any losses and expenses John Deere incurs if an unrelated external counterparty fails to meet its obligations on a derivative transaction that John Deere entered into to manage exposures of the Company.  The maximum amount of loss that the Company would incur on derivatives transacted with John Deere if the unrelated external counterparty would fail to meet its obligations, considering both the netting arrangements as well as the loss sharing agreement, was $71 million as of July 31, 2011.

Cash flow hedges

Certain interest rate and cross-currency interest rate contracts (swaps) were designated as hedges of future cash flows from borrowings. The total notional amounts of the receive-variable/pay-fixed interest rate contracts at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 were $350 million, $1,060 million and $1,430 million, respectively. The notional amount of cross-currency interest rate contracts at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 was $853 million, $849 million and $849 million, respectively. The effective portions of the fair value gains or losses on these cash flow hedges were recorded in other comprehensive income (OCI) and subsequently reclassified into interest expense or administrative and operating expenses (foreign exchange) in the same periods during which the hedged transactions affected earnings. These amounts offset the effects of interest rate or foreign currency exchange rate changes on the related borrowings. Any ineffective portions of the gains or losses on all interest rate contracts designated as cash flow hedges were recognized currently in interest expense or administrative and operating expenses (foreign exchange) and were not material during any periods presented. The cash flows from these contracts were recorded in operating activities in the statements of consolidated cash flows.

The amount of loss recorded in OCI at July 31, 2011 that is expected to be reclassified to interest expense or administrative and operating expenses in the next twelve months if interest rates or exchange rates remain unchanged is approximately $4 million after-tax. These contracts mature in up to 30 months. There were no gains or losses reclassified from OCI to earnings based on the probability that the original forecasted transaction would not occur.

Fair value hedges

Certain interest rate contracts (swaps) were designated as fair value hedges of borrowings. The total notional amounts of these receive-fixed/pay-variable interest rate contracts at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 were $6,730 million, $5,979 million and $6,462 million, respectively. The effective portions of the fair value gains or losses on these contracts were offset by fair value gains or losses on the hedged items (fixed-rate borrowings). Any ineffective portions of the gains or losses were recognized currently in interest expense. The ineffective portions were a gain of $2 million and none during the third quarter of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and a loss of $1 million and none during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively. The cash flows from these contracts were recorded in operating activities in the statements of consolidated cash flows.

The gains (losses) on these contracts and the underlying borrowings recorded in interest expense were as follows (in millions of dollars):

	Three Months Ended July 31,						Nine Months Ended July 31,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Interest rate contracts *	$	93.6		$	114.4		$	(30.5	)	$	103.6
Borrowings **	(91.3		)	(114.5		)	29.1			(103.4		)

*         Includes changes in fair value of interest rate contracts excluding net accrued interest income of $39.2 million and $50.1 million during the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 and $120.7 million and $161.4 million during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

**       Includes adjustments for fair values of hedged borrowings excluding accrued interest expense of $62.1 million and $77.2 million during the third quarter of 2011 and 2010 and $186.1 million and $237.1 million during the first nine months of 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments

The Company has certain interest rate contracts (swaps and caps), foreign exchange contracts (forwards and swaps) and cross-currency interest rate contracts (swaps), which were not formally designated as hedges. These derivatives were held as economic hedges for underlying interest rate or foreign currency exposures primarily for certain borrowings. The total notional amounts of these interest rate swaps at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 were $2,109 million, $2,009 million and $2,348 million, the foreign exchange contracts were $1,054 million, $1,000 million and $1,034 million and the cross-currency interest rate contracts were $49 million, $60 million and $58 million, respectively. At July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010 there were also $1,052 million, $1,055 million and $1,135 million, respectively, of interest rate caps purchased and the same amounts sold at the same capped interest rate to facilitate borrowings through securitization of retail notes. The fair value gains or losses from the interest rate contracts were recognized currently in interest expense and the gains or losses from foreign exchange contracts in administrative and operating expenses, generally offsetting over time the expenses on the exposures being hedged. The cash flows from these non-designated contracts were recorded in operating activities in the statements of consolidated cash flows.

Fair values of derivative instruments in the consolidated balance sheets were as follows (in millions of dollars):

	July 31, 2011		October 31, 2010		July 31, 2010
Receivables from John Deere
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	$	71.9
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	.1
Total designated	72.0
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	1.9
Other Assets
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	252.6		$	418.0	$	463.7
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	26.8		36.3		37.4
Foreign exchange contracts	.4		4.0		.9
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	1.0		2.9		4.4
Total not designated	28.2		43.2		42.7
Total derivatives	$	354.7	$	461.2	$	506.4
Other Payables to John Deere
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	$	.8
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	1.8
Total designated	2.6
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	1.8
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	.3
Total not designated	2.1
Accounts Payable and Accrued Expenses
Designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts			$	17.5	$	26.8
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	5.8		46.9		95.1
Total designated	5.8		64.4		121.9
Not designated as hedging instruments:
Interest rate contracts	5.3		13.7		18.6
Foreign exchange contracts	23.2		4.5		15.7
Cross-currency interest rate contracts	2.8		1.3		.6
Total not designated	31.3		19.5		34.9
Total derivatives	$	41.8	$	83.9	$	156.8

The classification and gains (losses), which include accrued interest expense, related to derivative instruments on the statements of consolidated income consisted of the following (in millions of dollars):

	Expense or OCI	Three Months Ended July 31				Nine Months Ended July 31
	Classification	2011		2010		2011		2010
Fair Value Hedges:
Interest rate contracts	Interest expense	$	132.8	$	164.5	$	90.2	$	265.0
Cash Flow Hedges:
Recognized in OCI
(Effective Portion):
Interest rate contracts	OCI (pretax) *	(1.9)		(5.9)		(4.8)		(12.1)
Foreign exchange contracts	OCI (pretax) *	(19.4)		(38.4)		34.3		(90.5)
Reclassified from OCI
(Effective Portion):
Interest rate contracts	Interest expense *	(3.1)		(18.5)		(18.4)		(57.8)
Foreign exchange contracts	Administrative and operating expenses *	(23.9)		(13.6)		27.4		(66.1)
Recognized Directly in Income
(Ineffective Portion):
Interest rate contracts	Interest expense	**		**		**		**
Foreign exchange contracts	Administrative and operating expenses	**		**		**		**
Not Designated as Hedges:
Interest rate contracts	Interest expense *	$	4.3	$	11.3	$	(.3)	$	11.4
Foreign exchange contracts	Administrative and operating expenses *	(5.7)		22.3		(108.3)		(8.0)
Total		$	(1.4)	$	33.6	$	(108.6)	$	3.4

* Includes interest and foreign exchange gains (losses) from cross-currency interest rate contracts.

**The amount is not significant.

Included in the above table are interest expense and administrative and operating expense amounts the Company incurred on derivatives transacted with John Deere. The amount of gain the Company recognized on these affiliate party transactions for the three months and nine months ended July 31, 2011 was $81 million and $98 million, respectively. As referenced in the VIE section of Note 1, during the first quarter of 2011 the centralized hedging center VIE that was previously consolidated into the Company’s financial statements was merged into JDFS and thus deconsolidated from the Company. Due to this merger having occurred in January 2011, the affiliate party interest expense amounts referenced above relate only to activity that took place between the merger date and July 31, 2011.

XML



PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

PENSION AND OTHER POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

(10) The Company is a participating employer in certain Deere & Company sponsored defined benefit pension plans for employees in the U.S. and certain defined benefit pension plans outside the U.S. These pension plans provide for benefits that are based primarily on years of service and employee compensation. Pension expense is actuarially determined based on the Company’s employees included in the plan. The Company’s pension expense amounted to $4.1 million in the first nine months of 2011. The accumulated benefit obligation and plan net assets for the employees of the Company are not determined separately from Deere & Company. The Company generally provides defined benefit health care and life insurance plans for retired employees in the U.S. as a participating employer in Deere & Company’s sponsored plans. Health care and life insurance benefits expense is actuarially determined based on the Company’s employees included in the plans and amounted to $6.1 million during the first nine months of 2011. Further disclosure for these plans is included in Deere & Company’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended July 31, 2011.

XML



ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE.

ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE

(8)	Assets and liabilities measured at fair value as Level 2 measurements on a recurring basis were as follows (in millions of dollars):
						July 31,				October 31,				July 31,
						2011				2010				2010
	Receivables from John Deere
	Derivatives:
	Interest rate contracts					$	73.8
	Cross-currency interest rate contracts					.1
	Other assets
	Derivatives:
	Interest rate contracts					279.4				$	454.3			$	501.1
	Foreign exchange contracts					.4				4.0				.9
	Cross-currency interest rate contracts					1.0				2.9				4.4
	Total assets *					$	354.7			$	461.2			$	506.4
	Other payables to John Deere
	Derivatives:
	Interest rate contracts					$	2.6
	Cross-currency interest rate contracts					2.1
	Accounts payable and accrued expenses
	Derivatives:
	Interest rate contracts					5.3				$	31.2			$	45.4
	Foreign exchange contracts					23.2				4.5				15.7
	Cross-currency interest rate contracts					8.6				48.2				95.7
	Total liabilities					$	41.8			$	83.9			$	156.8
	*      Excluded from this table are the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, which are carried at par value or amortized cost approximating fair value. The cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of money market funds.
	Fair value, nonrecurring, Level 3 measurements were as follows (in millions of dollars):
		Fair Value *										Losses
												Nine Months Ended
		July 31,		October 31,				July 31,				July 31,
		2011		2010				2010				2011				2010
	Receivables:
	Retail notes	$	.7	$	1.7			$	1.6			$	.1			$	.4
	Wholesale receivables			16.9				18.9								3.4
	Financing leases	.7		.2				.4				.3				.2
	Operating loans	.6		1.1				.7
	Total Receivables	$	2.0	$	19.9			$	21.6			$	.4			$	4.0
	*   Does not include cost to sell.
	Level 1 measurements consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2 measurements include significant other observable inputs such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets; observable inputs such as interest rates and yield curves; and other market-corroborated inputs. Level 3 measurements include significant unobservable inputs. There were no assets or liabilities valued using Level 1 measurements at July 31, 2011.
	Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. In determining fair value, the Company uses various methods including market and income approaches. The Company utilizes valuation models and techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs. The models are industry-standard models that consider various assumptions including time values and yield curves as well as other economic measures. These valuation techniques are consistently applied.

The following is a description of the valuation methodologies the Company uses to measure financial instruments at fair value:

Derivatives – The Company’s derivative financial instruments consist of interest rate swaps and caps, foreign currency forwards and swaps and cross-currency interest rate swaps. The portfolio is valued based on an income approach (discounted cash flow) using market observable inputs, including swap curves and both forward and spot exchange rates for currencies.

Receivables – Specific reserve impairments are based on the fair value of the collateral, which is measured using an income approach (discounted cash flow) or a market approach (appraisal values or realizable values). Inputs include interest rates and selection of realizable values.

XML



CONSOLIDATION, PRESENTATION AND ORGANIZATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

CONSOLIDATION, PRESENTATION AND ORGANIZATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

CONSOLIDATION, PRESENTATION AND ORGANIZATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(1)        John Deere Capital Corporation and its subsidiaries (Capital Corporation), and its other consolidated entities are collectively called the Company. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. have been condensed or omitted as permitted by such rules and regulations. All adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, have been included. Management believes that the disclosures are adequate to present fairly the financial position, results of operations and cash flows at the dates and for the periods presented. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto appearing in the Company’s latest annual report on Form 10-K. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of those to be expected for the fiscal year.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts and related disclosures. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Certain items previously reported in specific financial statement captions have been reclassified to conform to the 2011 financial statement presentation. Short-term securitization borrowings have been shown separately from other notes payable on the consolidated balance sheets as a result of the adoption of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2009-17 (see Note 2). The investing activities on the statements of consolidated cash flows have costs and collections related to wholesale receivables presented on a net basis. These receivables have short durations with a high turnover rate. The total cash flows for the investing activities have not changed.

During the first quarter of 2011, the variable interest entity (VIE) created by the Capital Corporation’s parent, John Deere Financial Services, Inc. (JDFS), that serves as a centralized hedging center, was merged into JDFS. As a result, the VIE was deconsolidated with no gains or losses recognized. All of the Capital Corporation’s derivative agreements and transactions outstanding with the VIE at the time of the merger were assumed by JDFS. In conjunction with this merger, the Capital Corporation began utilizing JDFS as a centralized hedging center to execute certain derivative transactions. Further detail regarding the structure of this centralized hedging center can be found in Note 9.

The Company provides and administers financing for retail purchases of new equipment manufactured by Deere & Company’s agriculture and turf and construction and forestry divisions and used equipment taken in trade for this equipment. The Company generally purchases retail installment sales and loan contracts (retail notes) from Deere & Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively called John Deere). John Deere generally acquires these retail notes through John Deere retail dealers. The Company also purchases and finances a limited amount of non-Deere retail notes and continues to service a small portfolio of recreational products and other retail notes. In addition, the Company leases John Deere equipment and a limited amount of non-Deere equipment to retail customers (financing and operating leases). The Company also finances and services revolving charge accounts, in most cases acquired from and offered through merchants in the agriculture and turf and construction and forestry markets (revolving charge accounts). The Company also provides wholesale financing for inventories of John Deere agriculture and turf and construction and forestry equipment owned by dealers of those products (wholesale receivables). Further, the Company finances and services operating loans, in most cases offered through and acquired from farm input providers or through direct relationships with agricultural producers or agribusinesses (operating loans). The Company also offers credit enhanced international export financing to select customers and dealers which generally involves John Deere products. Retail notes, revolving charge accounts, operating loans, financing leases and wholesale receivables are collectively called “Receivables.” Receivables and operating leases are collectively called “Receivables and Leases.”

XML



RECEIVABLES

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

RECEIVABLES

RECEIVABLES

(4)         Past due balances of Receivables represent the total balance held (principal plus accrued interest) with any payment amounts 30 days or more past the contractual payment due date.

Generally, when retail notes are approximately 120 days delinquent, accrual of finance income is suspended, the collateral is repossessed or the account is designated for litigation and the estimated uncollectible amount, after charging the dealer’s withholding account, if any, is written off to the allowance for credit losses. Revolving charge accounts are deemed to be uncollectible and written off to the allowance for credit losses when delinquency reaches 120 days for a John Deere Financial Multi-use account (formerly known as Farm Planä), PowerPlanâ or John Deere Financial Revolving Plan account. When a financing lease account becomes 120 days delinquent, the accrual of lease revenue is suspended, the equipment is repossessed or the account is designated for litigation, and the estimated uncollectible amount, after charging the dealer’s withholding account, if any, is written off to the allowance for credit losses. Generally, when a wholesale receivable becomes 60 days delinquent, the Company determines whether the accrual of finance income on interest-bearing wholesale receivables should be suspended, the collateral should be repossessed or the account should be designated for litigation and the estimated uncollectible amount written off to the allowance for credit losses. Finance income for non-performing Receivables is recognized on a cash basis. Accrual of finance income is resumed when the receivable becomes contractually current and collections are reasonably assured.

The Company monitors the credit quality of Receivables as either performing or non-performing monthly. Non-performing Receivables represent loans for which the Company has ceased accruing finance income.

An aging of total Receivables and non-performing Receivables was as follows (in millions of dollars):

	July 31, 2011
	30-59 Days Past Due		60-89 Days Past Due		90 Days or Greater Past Due *		Total Past Due
Retail notes:
Agriculture and turf equipment	$	76.4	$	58.2	$	21.2	$	155.8
Construction and forestry equipment	47.3		23.5		12.8		83.6
Recreational products	.1		.1				.2
Revolving charge accounts:
Agriculture and turf equipment	15.5		6.3		8.0		29.8
Construction and forestry equipment	2.0		.8		.3		3.1
Wholesale receivables:
Agriculture and turf equipment	1.3		.5		.6		2.4
Construction and forestry equipment	.6		.2		.2		1.0
Financing leases:
Agriculture and turf equipment	7.2		2.9		11.6		21.7
Construction and forestry equipment	2.4		.9		3.7		7.0
Operating loans:
Agriculture and turf equipment
Total Receivables	$	152.8	$	93.4	$	58.4	$	304.6

*              Receivables that are 90 days or greater past due and still accruing finance income.

	Total Past Due		Total Non- Performing		Current		Total Receivables
Retail notes:
Agriculture and turf equipment	$	155.8	$	45.6	$	11,789.5	$	11,990.9
Construction and forestry equipment	83.6		19.1		1,030.8		1,133.5
Recreational products	.2		.1		3.5		3.8
Revolving charge accounts:
Agriculture and turf equipment	29.8		.9		2,370.5		2,401.2
Construction and forestry equipment	3.1				55.5		58.6
Wholesale receivables:
Agriculture and turf equipment	2.4		1.1		5,000.7		5,004.2
Construction and forestry equipment	1.0				793.2		794.2
Financing leases:
Agriculture and turf equipment	21.7		12.5		277.2		311.4
Construction and forestry equipment	7.0		4.5		127.7		139.2
Operating loans:
Agriculture and turf equipment			2.4		111.2		113.6
Total Receivables	$	304.6	$	86.2	$	21,559.8	$	21,950.6

Allowance for credit losses on Receivables are maintained in amounts considered to be appropriate in relation to the Receivables outstanding based on collection experience, economic conditions and credit risk quality.

An analysis of the allowance for credit losses on Receivables was as follows (in millions of dollars):

	Three Months Ended
	July 31, 2011
	Retail Notes			Revolving Charge Accounts			Wholesale Receivables			Other			Total Receivables
Allowance:
Balance, beginning of the period	$	81.8		$	43.3		$	6.1		$	14.2		$	145.4
Provision (credit) for credit losses	(5.5		)	3.2			(.1		)	3.8			1.4
Write-offs	(2.9		)	(11.3		)				(1.8		)	(16.0		)
Recoveries	.7			6.3			.1			.4			7.5
Other changes *	(.1		)										(.1		)
Balance, end of the period	$	74.0		$	41.5		$	6.1		$	16.6		$	138.2

	Nine Months Ended
	July 31, 2011
	Retail Notes			Revolving Charge Accounts			Wholesale Receivables			Other			Total Receivables
Allowance:
Balance, beginning of the period	$	82.1		$	43.3		$	7.4		$	15.8		$	148.6
Provision (credit) for credit losses	(2.2		)	7.5			(1.4		)	4.3			8.2
Write-offs	(12.3		)	(29.7		)	(.3		)	(4.3		)	(46.6		)
Recoveries	6.0			20.4			.1			.6			27.1
Other changes *	.4						.3			.2			.9
Balance, end of the period	$	74.0		$	41.5		$	6.1		$	16.6		$	138.2
Balance individually evaluated	$	.6					$	.3		$	2.1		$	3.0
Balance collectively evaluated	$	73.4		$	41.5		$	5.8		$	14.5		$	135.2
Receivables:
Balance, end of the period	$	13,128.2		$	2,459.8		$	5,798.4		$	564.2		$	21,950.6
Balance individually evaluated	$	16.3		$	.4		$	.3		$	6.5		$	23.5
Balance collectively evaluated	$	13,111.9		$	2,459.4		$	5,798.1		$	557.7		$	21,927.1

*         Primarily translation adjustments

Receivables are considered impaired when it is probable the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms. Receivables reviewed for impairment generally include those that are either past due, or have provided bankruptcy notification, or require significant collection efforts. Receivables, which are impaired, are classified as non-performing.

An analysis of impaired Receivables was as follows (in millions of dollars):

		July 31, 2011
		Recorded Investment		Unpaid Principal Balance		Specific Allowance		Average Recorded Investment
Receivables with specific allowance: *
Retail notes		$	1.3	$	1.3	$	.6	$	1.3
Revolving charge accounts
Wholesale receivables		.3		.3		.3		1.0
Financing leases		1.1		.9		.4		1.2
Operating loans		2.3		2.3		1.7		3.7
Total		5.0		4.8		3.0		7.2
Receivables without specific allowance:
Retail notes		11.6		11.3				10.1
Total		$	16.6	$	16.1	$	3.0	$	17.3
Agriculture and turf		$	10.3	$	10.1	$	2.6	$	11.6
Construction and forestry		$	6.3	$	6.0	$	.4	$	5.7
	*            Finance income recognized was not material.

XML



SECURITIZATION OF RECEIVABLES

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

SECURITIZATION OF RECEIVABLES

SECURITIZATION OF RECEIVABLES

(5)	Securitization of receivables:
	The Company, as a part of its overall funding strategy, periodically transfers certain receivables (retail notes) into VIEs that are special purpose entities (SPEs), or a non-VIE banking operation, as part of its asset-backed securities programs (securitizations). The structure of these transactions is such that the transfer of the retail notes does not meet the criteria of sales of receivables, and is, therefore, accounted for as a secured borrowing. SPEs utilized in securitizations of retail notes differ from other entities included in the Company’s consolidated statements because the assets they hold are legally isolated. Use of the assets held by the SPEs or the non-VIE is restricted by terms of the documents governing the securitization transactions.
	In securitizations of retail notes related to secured borrowings, the retail notes are transferred to certain SPEs or to a non-VIE banking operation, which in turn issue debt to investors. The resulting secured borrowings are recorded as “Securitization borrowings” on the balance sheet. The securitized retail notes are recorded as “Retail notes securitized” on the balance sheet. The total restricted assets on the balance sheet related to these securitizations include the retail notes securitized less an allowance for credit losses, and other assets primarily representing restricted cash. For those securitizations in which retail notes are transferred into SPEs, the SPEs supporting the secured borrowings are consolidated unless the Company does not have both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the SPEs’ economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the SPEs. No additional support to these SPEs beyond what was previously contractually required has been provided during the reporting periods.
	In certain securitizations, the Company consolidates the SPEs since it has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the SPEs’ economic performance, through its role as servicer of all the Receivables held by the SPEs, and the obligation, through variable interests in the SPEs, to absorb losses or receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the SPEs. The restricted assets (retail notes securitized, allowance for credit losses and other assets) of the consolidated SPEs totaled $1,746 million, $1,739 million and $1,850 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The liabilities (securitization borrowings and accounts payable and accrued expenses) of these SPEs totaled $1,622 million, $1,654 million and $1,765 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The credit holders of these SPEs do not have legal recourse to the Company’s general credit.

In certain securitizations, the Company transfers retail notes to a non-VIE bank operation, which is not consolidated since the Company does not have a controlling interest in the entity. The Company’s carrying values and interests related to these securitizations with the unconsolidated non-VIE were restricted assets (retail notes securitized, allowance for credit losses and other assets) of $205 million and liabilities (securitization borrowings and accounts payable and accrued expenses) of $190 million at July 31, 2011.
In certain securitizations, the Company transfers retail notes into bank-sponsored, multi-seller, commercial paper conduits, which are SPEs that are not consolidated. The Company does not service a significant portion of the conduits’ receivables, and, therefore, does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the conduits’ economic performance. These conduits provide a funding source to the Company (as well as other transferors into the conduit) as they fund the retail notes through the issuance of commercial paper. The Company’s carrying values and variable interests related to these conduits were restricted assets (retail notes securitized, allowance for credit losses and other assets) of $613 million, $589 million and $877 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively. The liabilities (securitization borrowings and accounts payable and accrued expenses) related to these conduits were $570 million, $557 million and $815 million at July 31, 2011, October 31, 2010 and July 31, 2010, respectively.
The Company’s carrying amount of the liabilities to the unconsolidated conduits, compared to the maximum exposure to loss related to these conduits, which would only be incurred in the event of a complete loss on the restricted assets was as follows (in millions of dollars):
	July 31,
	2011
Carrying value of liabilities	$	570
Maximum exposure to loss		613
The total assets of unconsolidated VIEs related to securitizations were approximately $22 billion at July 31, 2011.
The components of consolidated restricted assets related to secured borrowings in securitization transactions were as follows (in millions of dollars):
			July 31, 2011			October 31, 2010			July 31, 2010
Retail notes securitized			$	2,504.5		$	2,264.9		$	2,662.6
Allowance for credit losses			(23.9		)	(26.6		)	(30.8		)
Other assets			83.2			90.0			95.1
Total restricted securitized assets			$	2,563.8		$	2,328.3		$	2,726.9
The components of consolidated secured borrowings and other liabilities related to securitizations were as follows (in millions of dollars):
			July 31, 2011			October 31, 2010			July 31, 2010
Securitization borrowings			$	2,380.9		$	2,208.8		$	2,577.3
Accounts payable and accrued expenses			1.4			1.8			2.2
Total liabilities related to restricted securitized assets			$	2,382.3		$	2,210.6		$	2,579.5
The secured borrowings related to these restricted retail notes are obligations that are payable as the retail notes are liquidated. Repayment of the secured borrowings depends primarily on cash flows generated by the restricted assets. Due to the Company’s short-term credit rating, cash collections from these restricted assets are not required to be placed into a restricted collection account until immediately prior to the time payment is required to the secured creditors. At July 31, 2011, the maximum remaining term of all restricted receivables was approximately six years.

XML



COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

(6)	Commitments and contingencies:
	At July 31, 2011, John Deere Credit Inc., the John Deere finance subsidiary in Canada, had $410 million of commercial paper, $1,766 million of medium-term notes outstanding, and a fair value liability of $10 million for derivatives, prior to considering applicable netting provisions, with a notional amount of $973 million that were guaranteed by the Company.
	The Company has commitments to extend credit to customers and John Deere dealers through lines of credit and other pre-approved credit arrangements. The Company applies the same credit policies and approval process for these commitments to extend credit as it does for its Receivables. Collateral is not required for these commitments, but if credit is extended, collateral may be required upon funding. The amount of unused commitments to extend credit to John Deere dealers was $3.1 billion at July 31, 2011. The amount of unused commitments to extend credit to customers was $31.8 billion at July 31, 2011. A significant portion of these commitments is not expected to be fully drawn upon; therefore, the total commitment amounts likely do not represent a future cash requirement. The Company generally has the right to unconditionally cancel, alter or amend the terms of these commitments at any time. Over 95 percent of these unused commitments to extend credit to customers relate to revolving charge accounts.
	At July 31, 2011, the Company had restricted other assets of $8 million. See Note 5 for additional restricted assets associated with borrowings related to securitizations.
	The Company also had other miscellaneous contingent liabilities totaling approximately $1 million at July 31, 2011, for which it believes the probability for payment is substantially remote. The accrued liability for these contingencies was not material at July 31, 2011.

XML



Statements of Changes in Consolidated Stockholder's Equity (USD $) In Millions	Total	Common Stock	Retained Earnings	Total Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)	Noncontrolling Interests	Comprehensive Income
Balance at Oct. 31, 2009	$ 2,317.0	$ 1,272.8	$ 1,032.1	$ 11.7	$ 0.4
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholder's Equity
Net income	222.7		222.7			222.7
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Cumulative translation adjustment	(30.6)			(30.6)		(30.6)
Unrealized gain on derivatives	14.0			14.0		14.0
Comprehensive income	206.1					206.1
Dividends paid	(130.0)		(130.0)
Balance at Jul. 31, 2010	2,393.1	1,272.8	1,124.8	(4.9)	0.4
Balance at Oct. 31, 2010	2,449.1	1,272.8	1,156.5	19.4	0.4
Increase (Decrease) in Stockholder's Equity
Net income	270.1		270.1			270.1
Other comprehensive income (loss)
Cumulative translation adjustment	24.0			24.0		24.0
Unrealized gain on derivatives	13.2			13.2		13.2
Comprehensive income	307.3					307.3
Dividends paid	(229.0)		(229.0)
Balance at Jul. 31, 2011	$ 2,527.4	$ 1,272.8	$ 1,197.6	$ 56.6	$ 0.4

XML



NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

9 Months Ended

Jul. 31, 2011

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

(2)New accounting standards adopted in the first nine months of  2011 were as follows:

In the first quarter of 2011, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2009-16, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, which amends Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 860, Transfers and Servicing (FASB Statement No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets an amendment of FASB Statement No. 140). This ASU eliminates the qualifying special purpose entities from the consolidation guidance and clarifies the requirements for isolation and limitations on portions of financial assets that are eligible for sale accounting. It requires additional disclosures about the risks from continuing involvement in transferred financial assets accounted for as sales. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In the first quarter of 2011, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2009-17, Improvements to Financial Reporting by Enterprises Involved with Variable Interest Entities, which amends ASC 810, Consolidation (FASB Statement No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R)). This ASU requires a qualitative analysis to determine the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The analysis identifies the primary beneficiary as the enterprise that has both the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the VIE’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits that could be significant to the VIE. The ASU also requires additional disclosures about an enterprise’s involvement in a VIE. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In the first quarter of 2011, the Company adopted FASB ASU No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses, which amends ASC 310, Receivables. This ASU requires disclosures related to receivables and the allowance for credit losses by portfolio segment. The ASU also requires disclosures of information regarding the credit quality, aging, nonaccrual status and impairments by class of receivable. A portfolio segment is the level at which a creditor develops a systematic methodology for determining its credit allowance. A receivable class is a subdivision of a portfolio segment with similar measurement attributes, risk characteristics and common methods to monitor and assess credit risk. The adoption did not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

New accounting standards to be adopted are as follows:

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. This ASU requires disclosures of transfers into and out of Levels 1 and 2, more detailed roll forward reconciliations of Level 3 recurring fair value measurements on a gross basis, fair value information by class of assets and liabilities, and descriptions of valuation techniques and inputs for Level 2 and Level 3 measurements. The effective date was the second quarter of fiscal year 2010 except for the roll forward reconciliations, which are required in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012. The adoption in 2010 did not have a material effect and the future adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-02, A Creditor’s Determination of Whether a Restructuring Is a Troubled Debt Restructuring, which amends ASC 310, Receivables. This ASU states that a troubled debt restructuring occurs when a creditor grants a concession it would not otherwise consider to a debtor that is experiencing financial difficulties. The guidance clarifies what would be considered a concession by the creditor and financial difficulties of the debtor. Certain disclosures are required for transactions that qualify as troubled debt restructurings. The effective date will be the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2011. The adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs, which amends ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement. This ASU also requires the categorization by level for items that are only required to be disclosed at fair value and information about transfers between Level 1 and Level 2. In addition, the ASU provides guidance on measuring the fair value of financial instruments managed within a portfolio and the application of premiums and discounts on fair value measurements. The ASU requires additional disclosure for Level 3 measurements regarding the sensitivity of fair value to changes in unobservable inputs and any interrelationships between those inputs. The effective date will be the second quarter of fiscal year 2012. The adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income, which amends ASC 220, Comprehensive Income. The ASU requires the presentation of total comprehensive income, total net income and the components of net income and comprehensive income either in a single continuous statement or in two separate but consecutive statements. In either presentation, adjustments for items that are reclassified from other comprehensive income to net income must be shown on the face of the financial statements. The other comprehensive income items may be shown net of tax effects with the taxes disclosed in a note, or pretax with the total taxes presented in one amount. The effective date will be the first quarter of fiscal year 2013 and must be applied retrospectively. The adoption will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

XML



Document and Entity Information	9 Months Ended
	Jul. 31, 2011
Document and Entity Information
Entity Registrant Name	DEERE JOHN CAPITAL CORP
Entity Central Index Key	0000027673
Document Type	10-Q
Document Period End Date	Jul. 31, 2011
Amendment Flag	false
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--10-31
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	2,500
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q3

XML



Consolidated Balance Sheets (USD $) In Millions	Jul. 31, 2011	Oct. 31, 2010	Jul. 31, 2010
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 326.0	$ 355.7	$ 319.1
Receivables:
Retail notes	10,623.7	9,989.3	8,797.7
Retail notes securitized	2,504.5	2,264.9	2,662.6
Revolving charge accounts	2,459.8	2,287.9	2,304.3
Wholesale receivables	5,798.4	4,658.7	5,049.2
Financing leases	450.6	420.4	400.4
Operating loans	113.6	239.1	204.4
Total receivables	21,950.6	19,860.3	19,418.6
Allowance for credit losses	(138.2)	(148.6)	(149.6)
Total receivables - net	21,812.4	19,711.7	19,269.0
Other receivables	33.3	22.3	27.1
Receivable from John Deere	73.9
Equipment on operating leases - net	1,112.4	1,141.8	1,037.7
Notes receivable from John Deere		575.5	595.5
Investment in unconsolidated affiliates	7.9	7.0	6.3
Other assets	590.2	810.5	900.2
Total Assets	23,956.1	22,624.5	22,154.9
Short-term borrowings:
Commercial paper and other notes payable	2,052.0	1,349.5	722.8
Securitization borrowings	2,380.9	2,208.8	2,577.3
John Deere	1,404.0	1,255.6	914.9
Current maturities of long-term borrowings	4,318.9	2,888.8	3,256.7
Total short-term borrowings	10,155.8	7,702.7	7,471.7
Other payables to John Deere	4.7
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	621.2	694.2	805.6
Deposits withheld from dealers and merchants	161.1	164.8	152.4
Deferred income taxes	211.8	161.7	64.9
Long-term borrowings	10,274.1	11,452.0	11,267.2
Total liabilities	21,428.7	20,175.4	19,761.8
Commitments and contingencies (Note 6)
Stockholder's equity:
Common stock, without par value (issued and outstanding - 2,500 shares owned by John Deere Financial Services, Inc.)	1,272.8	1,272.8	1,272.8
Retained earnings	1,197.6	1,156.5	1,124.8
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
Cumulative translation adjustment	72.6	48.6	25.2
Unrealized loss on derivatives	(16.0)	(29.2)	(30.1)
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	56.6	19.4	(4.9)
Total Company stockholder's equity	2,527.0	2,448.7	2,392.7
Noncontrolling interests	0.4	0.4	0.4
Total stockholder's equity	2,527.4	2,449.1	2,393.1
Total Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity	$ 23,956.1	$ 22,624.5	$ 22,154.9