-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, DP2K6r/7VxkvDneqLqOufscBt8MD2DZqPbEvHPzzZXaf2MVGKM6B/E8hSMzsyqyj T7Nr3xVN34dOyUZdMpBvww== 0000912057-97-010518.txt : 19970328 0000912057-97-010518.hdr.sgml : 19970328 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000912057-97-010518 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: S-2 PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 2 FILED AS OF DATE: 19970327 SROS: NASD FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: SEIBELS BRUCE GROUP INC CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000276380 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: FIRE, MARINE & CASUALTY INSURANCE [6331] IRS NUMBER: 570672136 STATE OF INCORPORATION: SC FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: S-2 SEC ACT: 1933 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 333-24081 FILM NUMBER: 97565805 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1501 LADY ST STREET 2: P O BOX 1 CITY: COLUMBIA STATE: SC ZIP: 29201 BUSINESS PHONE: 8037482000 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 1501 LADY ST STREET 2: P O BOX 1 CITY: COLUMBIA STATE: SC ZIP: 29201 S-2 1 SEIBELS BRUCE GROUP, INC. AS FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION ON MARCH 27, 1997 REGISTRATION NO. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 ------------------------ FORM S-2 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 ------------------------ THE SEIBELS BRUCE GROUP, INC. (Exact Name of registrant as Specified in Charter) SOUTH CAROLINA 57-0672136 (State or Other Jurisdiction (I.R.S. Employer of Incorporation or Organization) Identification Number)
------------------------ 1501 Lady Street Columbia, SC 29201 (803) 748-2000 (Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant's principal executive offices) ------------------------ Priscilla Brooks, Corporate Secretary The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc. 1501 Lady Street Columbia, SC 29201 (803) 748-2000 (Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code of agent for service) ------------------------ COPIES TO: Alan J. Prince, Esq. Matt P. McClure, Esq. Lars Bang-Jensen, Esq. KING & SPALDING THE SEIBELS BRUCE LEBOEUF, LAMB, GREENE & 191 Peachtree Street GROUP, INC. MACRAE, L.L.P. Atlanta, Georgia 1501 Lady Street 125 West 55th Street 30303 Columbia, SC 29201 New York, New York 10019-5389 (404) 572-4600 (803) 748-2000 (212) 424-8000
------------------------ APPROXIMATE DATE OF COMMENCEMENT OF PROPOSED SALE TO THE PUBLIC: As soon as practicable after the effective date of the Registration Statement. ------------------------ If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, check the following box. / / If the registrant elects to deliver its latest annual report to security holders, or a complete and legible facsimile thereof, pursuant to Item 11(a)(1) of this form, check the following box. / / If this form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. / / - -------------- If this form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. / / - -------------- If delivery of the prospectus is expected to be made pursuant to Rule 434, please check the following box. / / ------------------------ CALCULATION OF REGISTRATION FEE
PROPOSED MAXIMUM AGGREGATE OFFERING AMOUNT OF TITLE OF EACH CLASS OF SECURITIES TO BE REGISTERED PRICE(1) REGISTRATION FEE Common Stock, par value $1.00 per share................................................. $23,787,629 $7,209
(1) Estimated solely for the purpose of calculating the registration fee in accordance with Rule 457(o). THE REGISTRANT HEREBY AMENDS THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT ON SUCH DATE OR DATES AS MAY BE NECESSARY TO DELAY ITS EFFECTIVE DATE UNTIL THE REGISTRANT SHALL FILE A FURTHER AMENDMENT WHICH SPECIFICALLY STATES THAT THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL THEREAFTER BECOME EFFECTIVE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 8(A) OF THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 OR UNTIL THIS REGISTRATION STATEMENT SHALL BECOME EFFECTIVE ON SUCH DATE AS THE COMMISSION, ACTING PURSUANT TO SAID SECTION 8(A), MAY DETERMINE. - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO COMPLETION OR AMENDMENT. A REGISTRATION STATEMENT RELATING TO THESE SECURITIES HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION. THESE SECURITIES MAY NOT BE SOLD NOR MAY OFFERS TO BUY BE ACCEPTED PRIOR TO THE TIME THE REGISTRATION STATEMENT BECOMES EFFECTIVE. THIS PROSPECTUS SHALL NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR THE SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY, NOR SHALL THERE BE ANY SALE OF THESE SECURITIES IN ANY STATE IN WHICH SUCH OFFER, SOLICITATION OR SALE WOULD BE UNLAWFUL PRIOR TO REGISTRATION OR QUALIFICATION UNDER THE SECURITIES LAWS OF ANY SUCH STATE. SUBJECT TO COMPLETION PRELIMINARY PROSPECTUS DATED MARCH 27, 1997 2,853,089 SHARES [LOGO] COMMON STOCK ------------------ Of the 2,853,089 shares of Common Stock, $1.00 par value (the "Common Stock"), of The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc., a South Carolina corporation (the "Company" or "SBIG"), offered for sale hereby (the "Offering"), 1,853,089 shares are being offered by a certain shareholder (the "Selling Shareholder") and 1,000,000 shares are being offered by the Company. The Company will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of the shares of Common Stock by the Selling Shareholder. The Common Stock is currently traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market under the symbol "SBIG". The reported closing price of the Common Stock as of March 24, 1997 was $7.25. This closing price (and other share and per share information herein) reflects a 1-for-4 reverse stock split of the Common Stock which, pending shareholder approval, the Company anticipates will occur during the second quarter of 1997. See "Market Price of Common Stock." ------------------------ PROSPECTIVE INVESTORS SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FACTORS SET FORTH IN "RISK FACTORS" BEGINNING ON PAGE 7 HEREOF. ------------------------ THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED BY THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION NOR HAS THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OR ANY STATE SECURITIES COMMISSION PASSED UPON THE ACCURACY OR ADEQUACY OF THIS PROSPECTUS. ANY REPRESENTATION TO THE CONTRARY IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE.
UNDERWRITING PROCEEDS TO PRICE TO DISCOUNTS AND PROCEEDS TO SELLING PUBLIC COMMISSIONS(1) COMPANY(2) SHAREHOLDER Per Share.................. $ $ $ $ Total(3)................... $ $ $ $
(1) The Company and the Selling Shareholder have agreed to indemnify the Underwriters against certain liabilities, including liabilities under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. See "Underwriting." (2) Before deducting estimated expenses of the Offering of approximately payable by the Company. (3) The Company has granted the Underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 427,963 additional shares of Common Stock at the Price to Public less Underwriting Discounts and Commissions solely to cover over-allotments, if any. If the Underwriters exercise such option in full, the total Price to Public, Underwriting Discounts and Commissions, Proceeds to Company and Proceeds to Selling Shareholder will be $ , $ , $ and $ , respectively. ------------------------ The shares of Common Stock are offered severally by the Underwriters named herein, subject to prior sale, when, as and if delivered to and accepted by the Underwriters. The Underwriters reserve the right to reject orders in whole or in part and to withdraw, cancel or modify the Offering without notice. It is expected that delivery of certificates representing the shares of Common Stock will be made to the Underwriters on or about , 1997. ------------------------ ADVEST, INC. SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW, INC. The date of this Prospectus is , 1997. DESCRIPTION OF CHART Chart showing The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc. and certain principal subsidiaries and their specific lines of business. ------------------------ CERTAIN PERSONS PARTICIPATING IN THIS OFFERING MAY ENGAGE IN TRANSACTIONS THAT STABILIZE, MAINTAIN, OR OTHERWISE AFFECT THE PRICE OF THE COMMON STOCK OFFERED HEREBY, INCLUDING OVER-ALLOTMENT, STABILIZING TRANSACTIONS, SYNDICATE SHORT COVERING TRANSACTIONS AND PENALTY BIDS. FOR A DESCRIPTION OF THESE ACTIVITIES, SEE "UNDERWRITING." IN CONNECTION WITH THIS OFFERING, CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AND SELLING GROUP MEMBERS MAY ENGAGE IN PASSIVE MARKET MAKING TRANSACTIONS IN THE COMMON STOCK ON THE NASDAQ STOCK MARKET IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 103 OF REGULATION M. SEE "UNDERWRITING." FOR NORTH CAROLINA INVESTORS: These securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Commissioner of Insurance for the State of North Carolina (the "North Carolina Insurance Commissioner") nor has the North Carolina Insurance Commissioner ruled upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. STATE INSURANCE HOLDING COMPANY LAWS AND REGULATIONS APPLICABLE TO THE COMPANY IN GENERAL PROVIDE THAT NO PERSON MAY ACQUIRE CONTROL OF THE COMPANY, AND THUS INDIRECT CONTROL OF ITS INSURANCE SUBSIDIARIES, UNLESS SUCH ACQUISITION IS APPROVED BY THE APPROPRIATE INSURANCE REGULATORY AUTHORITIES. GENERALLY, ANY PERSON ACQUIRING BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF 10% OR MORE OF THE COMMON STOCK WOULD BE PRESUMED TO HAVE ACQUIRED SUCH CONTROL. SEE "BUSINESS--REGULATION." 2 PROSPECTUS SUMMARY THE FOLLOWING SUMMARY IS QUALIFIED IN ITS ENTIRETY BY, AND SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH, THE MORE DETAILED INFORMATION AND CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (INCLUDING THE NOTES THERETO) APPEARING ELSEWHERE, OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE, IN THIS PROSPECTUS. ALL FINANCIAL DATA FOR THE COMPANY ARE PRESENTED ON THE BASIS OF GENERALLY ACCEPTED ACCOUNTING PRINCIPLES ("GAAP") UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED, ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS (OTHER THAN INFORMATION INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE) (I) ASSUMES THAT THE UNDERWRITERS' OVER-ALLOTMENT OPTION WILL NOT BE EXERCISED AND (II) REFLECTS A 1-FOR-4 REVERSE STOCK SPLIT OF THE COMPANY'S COMMON STOCK, WHICH THE COMPANY ANTICIPATES WILL OCCUR, SUBJECT TO SHAREHOLDER APPROVAL, DURING THE SECOND QUARTER OF 1997. UNLESS THE CONTEXT OTHERWISE REQUIRES, THE "COMPANY" OR "SBIG" REFERS TO THE SEIBELS BRUCE GROUP, INC. AND ITS PREDECESSORS AND SUBSIDIARIES. SEE "GLOSSARY OF SELECTED INSURANCE AND CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS" FOR THE DEFINITION OF CERTAIN TERMS USED IN THIS PROSPECTUS. FOR A DISCUSSION OF CERTAIN FACTORS THAT SHOULD BE CONSIDERED BY PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE COMMON STOCK, SEE "RISK FACTORS." THE COMPANY The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc. provides automobile, flood and other property and casualty insurance services and products through independent agents primarily in the southeastern United States. The Company's largest source of revenues derives from its role as one of three servicing carriers for the South Carolina Reinsurance Facility (the "SC Facility"), a state-sponsored plan for insuring South Carolina drivers outside of the voluntary market. The Company also is a leading provider and an original participant in the National Flood Insurance Program (the "NFIP"), which is underwritten by the federal government. As a servicing carrier for the SC Facility and the NFIP, the Company receives commissions and fees for issuing, processing and administering policies as well as for claims adjustment, but reinsures all insurance risks with either the SC Facility or the NFIP, as applicable. The Company provides other fee-based services as a managing general agent ("MGA"), primarily for commercial lines, and as an excess and surplus lines broker, and also offers storm claims adjustment and liability run-off management services. Recently, the Company began limited efforts to market and underwrite nonstandard automobile insurance on a retained risk basis. The SC Facility provided automobile insurance to approximately 38% of all exposures in the State of South Carolina in 1995 and received approximately $455 million of private passenger premiums for its fiscal year ended September 30, 1996. Throughout its history, the SC Facility has operated at a deficit which has been funded by additional fees assessed annually against all insured drivers in South Carolina. Various efforts to reform the automobile insurance system in South Carolina by means of regulatory rate increases or more comprehensive legislative restructuring proposals have been initiated in recent years. The Company anticipates that current reform efforts are likely to result in changes to the South Carolina automobile insurance market that will cause the voluntary withdrawal from the SC Facility by insureds able to obtain more attractive premium rates in the voluntary market. The Company seeks to take advantage of the opportunity to market and sell automobile insurance products to these insureds by capitalizing on its existing agent relationships, underwriting data and experience with respect to the SC Facility and knowledge of the South Carolina automobile insurance market. See "Risk Factors--Anticipated Changes in Automobile Insurance Business in South Carolina." The Company has participated in the NFIP since the program's inception in 1983 and believes that it was one of the 10 largest NFIP servicing carriers for the program's fiscal year ended September 30, 1996. NFIP servicing carriers wrote approximately $1.2 billion of flood insurance premiums during the 1996 NFIP fiscal year. The NFIP had approximately 3.6 million flood insurance policies in force as of September 30, 1996. The Company is licensed to sell flood insurance in 43 states and markets its flood products through independent agents. The Company serves as a MGA in connection with commercial policies underwritten by Generali-U.S. Branch ("Generali"), a member of one of the largest international insurance groups. The Company sells 3 and services certain Generali commercial products, including commercial automobile insurance products and business owners insurance policies, in Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. The Company receives a commission, and Generali currently retains all of the underwriting risk. In addition, the Company acts as a MGA or broker for certain excess and surplus lines; provides claims adjustment and administrative services, including storm claims adjustment services for various insurers and associations; and provides services to companies running-off discontinued business. The Company was established in 1869 in Columbia, South Carolina and grew to become a leading property-casualty underwriter and managing general agent in the southeastern United States. Through its former subsidiary, Policy Management Systems Corporation ("PMSC"), the Company developed and marketed a computer software system in the 1970s which is widely used by the insurance industry. The Company sold its interest in PMSC between 1981 and 1985 to absorb significant losses in its insurance operations due primarily to environmental and construction defect claims in California on general liability policies written by the Company prior to 1985. Throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, the Company continued to experience significant losses, which were attributable to these general liability policies, poor experience on its workers' compensation business and the effects of Hurricanes Hugo in 1989 and Andrew in 1992. These operating losses reduced the Company's shareholders' equity to $650,000 by the end of 1994, and prompted the Company to suspend its risk-bearing insurance operations in early 1995. In early 1995, the Company replaced its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and began an ongoing effort to recruit additional management. New management has taken a number of actions to stabilize and improve the Company's financial condition through significant cost reductions, the raising of new equity capital and a renewed emphasis on fee-based businesses. As a result of these actions and the relative stabilization of its loss experience, the Company was profitable in 1995 and 1996 and resumed limited insurance underwriting activities in 1996. By December 31, 1996, shareholders' equity had increased to $23.8 million. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, the Company's revenues were $57.2 million and net income was $5.2 million. STRATEGY. The Company's objective is to increase its revenues and net income by growing its business primarily in the southeastern United States. To meet its objective, the Company intends to: - develop its retained risk automobile insurance business by capitalizing on the anticipated withdrawal of insureds from the SC Facility and on its existing agent relationships; - expand its flood insurance operations by expanding agent coverage particularly in several high-volume markets, promoting its claims service to agents, offering bundled flood insurance services and products, and providing agent incentives; - enhance the profitability of its relationship with Generali by improving loss ratios, reducing operating expenses and assuming a portion of the insurance risk on the Generali commercial policies; - increase its excess and surplus lines business and storm claims adjustment service business by expanding the types of products available and continuing to improve the quality of services provided to agents and policyholders; and - continue to reduce expenses and improve productivity through the upgrading of management information systems and the continued implementation of an in-house restructuring program to improve communications and work flow between the Company's claims and underwriting staffs. The Company's principal executive offices are located at 1501 Lady Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201, and its telephone number is (803) 748-2000. 4 FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS Certain statements in this Prospectus Summary and under the captions "Risk Factors," "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," "Business" and elsewhere in this Prospectus constitute "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include statements relating to reform initiatives regarding the SC Facility and the potential voluntary withdrawal of insureds from such facility; and the Company's strategy to increase revenues and net income by, among other things, growing its various lines of business, developing new products and reducing expenses. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to be materially different from any future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. See "Risk Factors." THE OFFERING Common Stock being offered by: The Company................................ 1,000,000 shares The Selling Shareholder.................... 1,853,089 shares --------------------------------------------- Total shares offered..................... 2,853,089 shares Common Stock outstanding after the Offering 7,237,033 shares (1)........................................ Use of Proceeds.............................. The proceeds derived from the sale of shares of Common Stock offered by the Company will be retained for general corporate purposes, including possible acquisitions. The Company will also contribute a portion of the proceeds to one or more of its insurance company subsidiaries for statutory surplus as necessary to support insurance operations. The Company will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the shares of Common Stock offered by the Selling Shareholder. Nasdaq Stock Market Symbol................... SBIG
- ------------------------ (1) Based upon shares outstanding on March 24, 1997. Does not include (i) 635,181 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of stock options outstanding on such date and (ii) 16,059 shares of restricted stock issued pursuant to the Company's stock plans. 5 SUMMARY CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS)
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------- 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenues: Commission and service income................ $ 35,943 $ 41,625 $ 60,669 $ 49,572(1) $ 45,585 Property and casualty premiums............... 117,172 55,331 14,718 10,384 7,186 Credit life premiums......................... 4,247 3,207 1,801 890 478 Net investment income........................ 9,973 5,455 5,321 3,176 3,006 Other interest income........................ 2,987 1,635 905 1,154 801 Realized gains (losses) on investments....... 7,040 1,969 (6,327) 164 (14) Other income................................. 4,019 4,697 2,673 843 151 ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- Total revenues............................... 181,381 113,919 79,760 66,183 57,193 Net income (loss).............................. $ (32,666) $ (1,014) $ (19,074) $ 1,152 $ 5,176 Net income (loss) per share and common equivalent share............................. $ (17.42) $ (0.54) $ (6.89) $ 0.28 $ 0.90 Weighted average shares outstanding............ 1,875 1,875 2,767 4,181 6,382 OTHER OPERATIONS DATA: Revenue from current operations(2)............. -- -- $ 62,944 $ 50,804 $ 51,475 Revenue from run-off operations(3)............. -- -- 14,244 10,042 1,774 DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------- 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------- ---------- BALANCE SHEET DATA: Total cash and investments..................... $ 161,769 $ 120,480 $ 61,868 $ 50,641 $ 42,944 Total assets(4)................................ 461,136 324,695 255,935 224,005 220,472 Losses and loss adjustment expenses(4)......... 257,602 194,682 166,698 145,523 132,152 Total debt..................................... 25,153 11,934 439 2,476 0 Shareholders' equity........................... 14,219 13,902 650 10,187 23,791 Book value per share........................... 7.58 7.41 0.18 2.44 3.86 STATUTORY SURPLUS(5)............................. $ 18,440 $ 17,352 $ (1,615) $ 9,301 $ 21,632
- ------------------------ (1) As a result of a competitive bidding process, in October 1994, the Company was awarded a new contract with the SC Facility for a smaller block of business at lower rates. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business--Nonstandard Automobile Insurance Business--Industry Background." (2) Reflects revenue from the lines of business in which the Company is currently engaged. (3) Reflects revenue derived from lines of business for which the Company is no longer writing new or renewal policies. It includes (i) run-off premiums from retained credit life business in force at the time the Company sold such business in September 1993, (ii) workers' compensation premiums through 1994 and (iii) premiums on certain personal line policies. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." (4) Includes losses and LAE subject to ceded reinsurance recoverable in the following amounts (in thousands): $140,969 in 1992; $76,221 in 1993; $88,731 in 1994; $84,492 in 1995; and $84,725 in 1996. (5) Reflects the statutory surplus of South Carolina Insurance Company ("SCIC"), the Company's principal insurance subsidiary. 6 RISK FACTORS THERE ARE CERTAIN RISKS INVOLVED IN AN INVESTMENT IN THE COMMON STOCK. ACCORDINGLY, PROSPECTIVE PURCHASERS OF THE COMMON STOCK SHOULD CONSIDER CAREFULLY THE FACTORS SET FORTH BELOW AS WELL AS THE OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED IN OR INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE INTO THIS PROSPECTUS. ANTICIPATED CHANGES IN AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE BUSINESS IN SOUTH CAROLINA Commission and service income earned by the Company as a servicing carrier for the SC Facility constitutes the Company's largest source of revenues. The Company's agreement with the SC Facility expires September 30, 1999. However, if legislation recently approved by the South Carolina Senate is enacted, the SC Facility will be gradually phased-out over the next three years. In any event, the Company believes that the number of South Carolina drivers obtaining insurance from the SC Facility will be significantly reduced over the next few years either as a result of the enactment of this or other proposed legislation or anticipated regulatory action increasing premium rates. Accordingly, the Company could earn significantly less commission and service income in the future, which could materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations. While the Company believes that a gradual depopulation of the SC Facility will present opportunities for the Company to expand its risk-bearing automobile insurance business in South Carolina, there can be no assurance that the Company's strategy to expand such business will be successful or that such business will be profitable. See "--Re-Entry into Risk-Bearing Activities" and "Business--Nonstandard Automobile Insurance Business." FINANCIAL CONDITION; RECENT LOSSES The Company incurred substantial losses from 1989 through 1994. For the years ended December 31, 1992, 1993 and 1994, the Company recorded net losses of approximately $32.7 million, $1.0 million (after an extraordinary item) and $19.1 million, respectively. Losses incurred by the Company through 1994 significantly reduced the shareholders' equity of the Company and the statutory surplus of its insurance subsidiaries. As a result, the Company suspended its insurance activities on which it retained risks in the second quarter of 1995. Having increased capital and improved operating results, the Company received authorization from the South Carolina Department of Insurance to resume underwriting new business on a limited basis during the third quarter of 1996. Although the Company reported net income of $1.2 million and $5.2 million for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996, respectively, there can be no assurance that the Company will not suffer further operating losses in the future which may significantly affect its financial condition. See "--Uncertainty Associated with Estimating Reserves; History of Reserve Deficiencies." The Company also has experienced negative cash flows from operations for each of the last three fiscal years. The Company's withdrawal from most of its insurance activities on which it retained risks caused a significant reduction in its operating cash flows while the Company continued to pay a significant amount of claims related to the run-off of such retained risk activities. While the Company has been able to meet its cash flow obligations through the sale of investments, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to meet its cash flow requirements in the future if claims payment requirements significantly exceed the Company's current expectations. UNCERTAINTY ASSOCIATED WITH ESTIMATING RESERVES; HISTORY OF RESERVE DEFICIENCIES Although the Company currently underwrites insurance on a limited basis, the Company has historically written substantial amounts of insurance on a retained risk basis, and as such it could report significant losses in the future in excess of its current reserves for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expenses ("LAE") due to this past underwriting activity. The reserves for losses and LAE established by the Company are estimates of ultimate amounts needed to pay reported and unreported claims and related expenses based on facts and circumstances known to the Company at the time it established the reserves. Substantial uncertainties are inherent in the establishment of appropriate reserves for property and casualty insurers. Such uncertainties are significantly greater in estimating reserves for environmental, 7 toxic tort and other casualty claims which the Company continues to maintain. Due to the inherent uncertainty of estimating reserves, it has been necessary, and may over time continue to be necessary, to revise estimated future liabilities as reflected in the Company's reserves for claims and policy expenses. For each of the three years ended December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996, the Company incurred increases in estimated losses and LAE for claims occurring in prior years of approximately $17.0 million, $3.4 million and $1.1 million, respectively. For the calendar years 1986 through 1993, the Company ultimately experienced cumulative reserve deficiencies for those years that ranged between $23 million and $89 million. To the extent that reserves prove to be deficient in the future, the Company will have to increase its reserves by the amount of the deficiency and incur a charge to earnings in the period such reserves are increased, which could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the Company. See "The Company" and "Business--Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses." RE-ENTRY INTO RISK-BEARING ACTIVITIES As a result of its operating losses and impaired financial condition, the Company suspended all insurance underwriting activities on which it retained insurance risks in the second quarter of 1995. Following a recapitalization, an improvement in operating results and the approval of the South Carolina Director of Insurance, the Company resumed insurance underwriting activities on a limited, risk-bearing basis in the third quarter of 1996. The Company's strategy for adapting to the anticipated depopulation of the SC Facility and the consequent reduction in service and commission income is dependent on the Company's ability to market and sell nonstandard automobile insurance on a profitable basis to insureds withdrawing from the SC Facility. The ability of the Company to market, sell and profitably underwrite nonstandard automobile insurance and other lines of insurance may be significantly affected by a variety of factors specific to the Company or the business, including the following: ABILITY TO MARKET PRODUCTS THROUGH EXISTING AGENCY RELATIONSHIPS. The Company intends to capitalize on its agency relationships in order to market and sell nonstandard automobile insurance. Currently, all private passenger automobile liability insurance business produced by Designated Agents must be ceded to the SC Facility and, as a result, such agents are not permitted to produce such business for insurers in the voluntary market. If, however, the SC Facility is reorganized pursuant to legislation recently approved by the South Carolina Senate, then the Designated Agents will be allowed to produce automobile insurance business for the voluntary market. There can be no assurance that Designated Agents will be legally permitted to write voluntary business for the Company or that the Company will be able to recruit Designated Agents that it currently services or has serviced in the past to market and sell its nonstandard automobile insurance products. UNCERTAIN PRICING AND PROFITABILITY. Although the Company has been servicing the SC Facility since 1974, it has only recently begun to underwrite nonstandard automobile insurance on a retained-risk basis. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to price its nonstandard automobile products or rate potential policyholders profitably or competitively. Further, it is unclear what impact depopulation of the SC Facility will have on the competitive environment for nonstandard automobile insurance in South Carolina. The Company likely will compete with regional and national insurers that have greater financial resources than the Company and superior ratings from A.M. Best Company, Inc. ("A.M. Best"). REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS ON UNDERWRITING ACTIVITIES. The South Carolina Director of Insurance authorized the resumption of underwriting activities by the Company on the condition that the Company maintain a ratio of net premiums written to statutory surplus of 0.85 to one, which ratio is substantially lower than the maximum three to one ratio normally allowed by the regulators. As a result of this requirement, net premiums written in 1997 cannot exceed $18.4 million based on the statutory surplus of SCIC (the Company's principal insurance subsidiary) of approximately $21.6 million as of December 31, 1996. Due to the Company's history of operating losses and recently impaired financial condition, the 8 Company has been, and anticipates that it will continue to be, subject to more stringent regulatory scrutiny and limitations than other insurance carriers which could significantly impede its ability to expand its underwriting activities. FUTURE GROWTH AND CONTINUED OPERATIONS DEPENDENT ON ACCESS TO CAPITAL. Significant future growth in the Company's risk-bearing insurance operations will depend on the Company's ability to obtain additional capital for its insurance subsidiaries. Such capital will likely have to be obtained through equity or debt financing as well as retained earnings. There can be no assurance that the Company will have access to sufficient capital to support future growth and to satisfy the capital requirements of rating agencies and regulators. ABSENCE OF RATING. The Company has elected not to be rated by A.M. Best, the industry's leading rating authority, and accordingly was last assigned a group rating of NR-4 ("Not Assigned-Company Request"). A.M. Best is an independent company which rates insurance companies based on its judgment of factors related to the insurer's ability to meet policyholder and other contractual obligations. Most of the Company's competitors have A.M. Best ratings. While the Company believes the lack of a rating is less significant in underwriting nonstandard automobile business than other lines of business, there can be no assurance that the Company's current absence of a rating or any future rating will not affect the Company's competitive position and results of operations. RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH THE NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM The Company derives a substantial portion of its net income from its role as a servicing carrier for the NFIP. While the Company remains one of the leading producers of flood insurance, the volume of premiums serviced by the Company has declined in recent years. The volume of flood insurance written by the Company and the Company's results of operations could be adversely affected by a variety of factors specific to the Company or the NFIP generally, including the following: ABSENCE OF HOMEOWNER'S INSURANCE PRODUCT. The Company currently does not offer a homeowner's insurance product. Many consumers in flood-prone areas purchase flood insurance at the same time they purchase homeowners insurance. Accordingly, the Company believes that its failure to offer a homeowner's insurance product has limited its ability to expand its flood insurance business in certain markets. The Company has no current plans to offer a homeowner's insurance product. SYSTEMS OPERATIONS. The Company has encountered difficulties in complying with FEMA statistical reporting requirements. FEMA has given the Company until June 26, 1997 to comply with FEMA statistical reporting requirements. In order to comply with such requirements, the Company has recently entered into an agreement with a major provider of processing services for the NFIP to outsource the processing of its flood insurance business. Although the Company expects that its new outsourcing arrangement will enable the Company to meet FEMA statistical reporting requirements, there can be no assurance that the Company will in fact be able to do so or that the Company will be able to comply with such requirements on an ongoing basis. If the Company fails to comply with FEMA statistical reporting requirements, it could be prohibited from writing flood insurance through the NFIP, which would materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations. INDEPENDENT AGENTS. The Company markets flood insurance through independent agents. While the Company believes that the commissions and services it provides to its agents are generally competitive with other servicing carriers, there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to continue to attract and retain independent agents to sell its flood insurance products. VOLATILITY OF FLOOD CLAIMS BUSINESS. Since the demand for flood insurance typically increases after the occurrence of floods and the Company's results of operations are favorably affected through servicing flood claims, the extent to which floods occur infrequently or are minimal in magnitude could have an 9 adverse effect on the profitability of the Company. See "Business--Flood Insurance--Claims" and "Business--Other Business--Insurance Network Services." LEGISLATIVE AND CONTRACT CHANGES. The Company's agreement with the NFIP is renewed annually and is conditioned upon the Company meeting certain standards and requirements prescribed by FEMA. Commission rates for servicing carriers participating in the NFIP are set annually by FEMA. There can be no assurance that future federal legislative or regulatory changes in the NFIP will not also adversely affect the Company's results of operations. Furthermore, there can be no assurance that FEMA will renew its agreement with the Company or that FEMA will not reduce the commission currently paid to servicing carriers. DEPENDENCE ON KEY PERSONNEL IN CONNECTION WITH FUTURE SUCCESS The future success of the Company depends significantly upon the efforts of certain key management personnel including former Governor of South Carolina John C. West, Chairman of the Board of Directors, Ernst N. Csiszar, President and Chief Executive Officer, and John A. Weitzel, Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Csiszar was diagnosed in November 1995 as having chronic myelogenous, a form of leukemia for which he is currently receiving treatment. This illness has not significantly impaired Mr. Csiszar's ability to perform his duties as President and Chief Executive Officer. Loss of any of these individuals could adversely affect the Company's business. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to recruit and retain additional qualified management personnel in the future. See "Management--Directors and Executive Officers of the Company." COMPETITION The markets in which the Company does, or plans to do business, generally are highly competitive. The Company competes with large national companies and smaller regional companies. The Company's competitors generally have greater financial and marketing resources and insurance underwriting experience than the Company and superior ratings from A.M. Best, which are factors which may significantly influence, in particular the Company's ability to market and profitably sell its insurance products. Management believes that the Company's ability to compete with other companies in its chosen lines of business will also be affected by, among other things, its ability to develop competitive and profitable products and the quality of service it provides to customers as well as to its agents. There can be no assurance that the Company's responses to the highly competitive environment in which it operates will be successful. Nor can there be any assurance that the Company's limited capital and lack of rating from A.M. Best will not prevent it from actively competing in the current market place. See "Business-- Competition." RISKS ASSOCIATED WITH SYSTEMS OPERATIONS The Company operates and maintains its own computer system for its operations, including policy issuance, billing, claims processing, and financial and management reporting. Commencing in late 1994, the Company began changing its policy and claims processing operations from an outsourcing arrangement with a third party vendor to its own computer systems primarily to reduce operating expenses. The Company has experienced difficulties in transitioning to its computer systems, particularly in its MGA commercial lines operations and is in the process of establishing a data bridge between the Company's internal data processing systems in order to eliminate redundant entry of policy information and reduce policy issuance time. The Company anticipates that such transitioning will be completed during the third quarter of 1997. There can be no assurance that the data bridge will be implemented as scheduled and as such, the Company's plans to assume a portion of the MGA commercial lines risk may be delayed which delay could adversely affect the Company's results of operations. 10 DIVIDEND AND OTHER RESTRICTIONS The Company is a holding company with no direct operations, the principal asset of which is the capital stock of its wholly-owned subsidiaries. As a holding company, the Company's primary sources of cash needed to meet its obligations, including principal and interest payments with respect to any indebtedness, are dividends and other permitted payments from its subsidiaries and affiliates. The payment of dividends to the Company by SCIC, the Company's principal subsidiary and the parent company of the Company's other insurance subsidiaries, is subject, among other things, to limitations imposed by the South Carolina insurance laws and regulations and will depend on SCIC's statutory earnings, statutory surplus and capital. These laws and regulations limit the aggregate amount of dividends or distributions that SCIC may declare or pay to the Company within any 12-month period without the permission of the South Carolina Director of Insurance. The payment of dividends to SCIC by the Company's other insurance subsidiaries is subject to similar limitations. See "Business--Regulation-- Regulation of Dividends and Other Payments from Insurance Subsidiaries." There can be no assurance that legislative changes will not result in statutory provisions more restrictive than those currently in effect. Currently, none of the Company's South Carolina subsidiaries, including SCIC, is permitted to pay a dividend to the Company without the prior approval of the South Carolina Department of Insurance. For the past five years, SCIC has not made a dividend payment to the Company. The inability of the Company's subsidiaries to pay dividends to the Company could have a material adverse effect on the Company's ability to meet the cash requirements of the holding company or to pay dividends to its shareholders. CONTROL BY PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS Prior to the completion of the Offering, the three principal shareholders of the Company are the Selling Shareholder, a group of investors that acquired shares of Common Stock from the Company in a private transaction in September 1996 (the "Powers Group") and a second group of investors that acquired shares of Common Stock from the Company in a private transaction in March 1996 (the "Avent Group"), who beneficially own, approximately 29.7%, 41.2% and 12.4%, respectively, of the Common Stock on a fully diluted basis. After completion of the Offering, the Powers Group and the Avent Group will beneficially own approximately 36.6% and 10.7%, respectively, of the Common Stock on a fully diluted basis. Accordingly, the Powers Group and the Avent Group will have the ability to exert significant influence over the policies and affairs of the Company and will have the right to designate two directors and one director, respectively, to be included as nominees for election to the Board of Directors by the shareholders. See "Principal and Selling Shareholders." GOVERNMENT REGULATION The Company is subject to substantial government regulation in each of its lines of business and each of the states and other jurisdictions in which it conducts business. As a servicing carrier for the SC Facility and the NFIP, the Company must comply with certain requirements and guidelines established by the South Carolina Department of Insurance and FEMA, respectively. The Company's failure to comply with these requirements and guidelines could result in the termination of the Company's participation in these programs. See "--Risks Associated with National Flood Insurance Program," "Business--Nonstandard Automobile Insurance," "Business--Flood Insurance" and "Business--Regulation." The Company's insurance, MGA and excess and surplus lines brokerage businesses are also subject to regulation by the insurance departments in each of the states in which these businesses are conducted. The regulation of the Company's insurance subsidiaries is designed to protect the interests of policyholders as opposed to stockholders and typically relates to authorized lines of business, premium rates, capital and surplus requirements, investment parameters, underwriting limitations, transactions with affiliates, dividend limitations and changes in control. The Company is also subject to assessments by guaranty funds related to insolvent insurers and by governmental pools and associations, including the North Carolina 11 Reinsurance Facility (the "NC Facility"). These assessments may materially affect the Company's results of operations. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business--Regulation." The Company is also subject to a risk-based capital ("RBC") formula which has been adopted to enable insurance regulators to evaluate the adequacy of statutory capital and surplus of property and casualty insurers in relation to investment and insurance risks. No assurance can be given that future legislative or regulatory changes will not adversely affect the Company. See "--Re-entry into Risk-Bearing Activities--Regulatory Constraints on Underwriting Activities" and "Business-- Regulation." GEOGRAPHIC CONCENTRATION A large portion of the Company's business is concentrated in the states of South Carolina (60% of total 1996 gross premiums written), North Carolina (13% of total 1996 gross premiums written) and Kentucky (8% of total 1996 gross premiums written). As such, the Company's revenues and profitability may be significantly affected by prevailing economic, regulatory, demographic and other conditions in these states. For example, proposed legislation is currently pending before the South Carolina legislature which, if enacted, would materially affect the Company's business with the SC Facility. See "--Anticipated Changes in Automobile Insurance Business in South Carolina." SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE AND POSSIBLE EFFECT ON THE MARKET PRICE OF THE COMMON STOCK Upon completion of the Offering, there will be outstanding 7,237,033 shares of Common Stock. The shares of Common Stock offered hereby by the Company and currently issued and outstanding shares of Common Stock will be freely tradeable in the public market without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), by persons other than affiliates of the Company. The remaining shares of Common Stock outstanding will be "restricted securities" within the meaning of Rule 144 as promulgated under the Securities Act. The Company, its officers and directors and certain shareholders (which beneficially owned 19,061,146 shares of Common Stock as of March 19, 1997) have agreed not to, for a period of 180 days after the date of this Prospectus, directly or indirectly, (i) offer, sell, contract to sell or otherwise dispose of any shares of Common Stock or securities convertible into or exchangeable for Common Stock or (ii) enter into any swap or other agreement or any transaction that transfers, in whole or in part, the economic consequences of ownership of shares of Common Stock whether any such swap or other agreement is to be settled by delivery of shares of Common Stock, other securities, cash or otherwise without the prior written consent of Advest, Inc., as representative of the Underwriters. See "Underwriting." No prediction can be made as to the effect, if any, that future sales of shares, or the availability of shares for future sale, will have on the market price of the Common Stock prevailing from time to time. Sales of substantial amounts of Common Stock in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect prevailing market prices for the Common Stock. If such sales reduce the market price of the Common Stock, the Company's ability to raise additional capital in the equity markets also could be adversely affected. MARKET FOR COMMON STOCK; POSSIBLE PRICE VOLATILITY The Company's Common Stock is currently listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market, and its average daily trading volume over the 52 weeks ended March 21, 1997 was approximately 6,700 shares. While the shares to be sold by the Company in the Offering will increase the amount of Common Stock available for trading, there can be no assurance that a more active trading market will develop or, if developed, that it will be maintained. 12 The market price of the Company's Common Stock has experienced significant volatility over the last five years. Factors such as significant claims payments, adjustments in reserves, changes in the value of the Company's investment portfolio, cancellation or amendment of contractual relationships, competitive market conditions, governmental regulation, regulatory approvals or developments relating to corporate alliances or proprietary rights may have a significant impact on the market price of the Common Stock. In addition, general market price declines, volatility or share illiquidity in the future could adversely affect the market price of the Common Stock. There can be no assurance that the market price of the Common Stock will not decline after an investor purchases shares, or that following the purchase of the shares of Common Stock, a shareholder will be able to sell shares at a price equal to or greater than the public offering price. See "Market Price of Common Stock." EFFECT OF CERTAIN ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS The Company's Articles of Incorporation, the South Carolina Business Corporation Act of 1988 and the insurance laws of states in which the Company conducts business contain certain provisions which could delay or impede the removal of incumbent directors and could make more difficult a merger, tender offer or proxy contest involving the Company, even if such a transaction would be beneficial to the interests of the shareholders, or could discourage a third party from attempting to acquire control of the Company. In particular, the classification of the Company's Board of Directors and insurance regulations which require prior regulatory approval with respect to a change of control could have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company. See "Description of Capital Stock--Existing Anti-takeover Provisions" and "Business--Regulation." 13 THE COMPANY SBIG is the holding company parent of SCIC, Seibels Bruce & Company ("SBC"), and the wholly-owned subsidiaries of SCIC and SBC. The Company's predecessor was established in 1869 in Columbia, South Carolina as a small insurance and real estate business. SCIC was formed in 1910 to write fire insurance coverage. SCIC eventually became the parent company of the other insurance subsidiaries, which include Catawba Insurance Company ("Catawba"), Consolidated American Insurance Company ("Consolidated American") and Kentucky Insurance Company. SBIG, a South Carolina corporation, was formed in 1978 to become the holding company of the group. During the 1970s, the Company created a new business that developed, marketed and serviced computer software systems for the property and casualty insurance industry and provided computer processing for certain customers. Between 1981 and 1985, the Company sold its entire interest in the company, Policy Management Systems Corporation ("PMSC"), now a publicly-held company currently traded on the New York Stock Exchange. By the early 1980s, the Company's expanded operations included property and casualty insurance underwriting, the servicing of various accounts, reinsurance, life, credit life and title insurance, travel agency services, computer systems, flood operations, reinsurance facility servicing carrier operations, excess and surplus lines and loss adjustment services. Beginning in 1981 the Company experienced a series of financial losses. As part of its plans to expand operations nationwide, the Company acquired a California managing general agency, Rathbone, King & Seeley, Inc. ("RKS"), in 1981. Through RKS' insurance company subsidiary, American Star Insurance Company ("American Star"), the Company assumed and continued to write general liability policies in the western United States that included contractors' liability and environmental coverages. RKS and American Star subsequently accumulated substantial losses and were sold in 1985. A portion of the liabilities and corresponding losses were retained by the Company. See "Business--Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses." During the late 1980s, the Company, through its subsidiary Consolidated American, began writing increasingly larger amounts of commercial and workers' compensation coverages in the Southeast, particularly in Florida. These risks generated substantial losses for the Company as well and were discontinued in the early 1990s. The last of these policies expired in 1994. Natural catastrophes had an adverse effect on the Company due to the significant amount of personal and commercial business written by the Company in the Southeast. In 1989, Hurricane Hugo generated approximately $45 million (approximately $9.9 million after reinsurance) in gross claims paid by the Company. In 1992, the Company sustained approximately $106 million (approximately $49.8 million after reinsurance) in gross claims paid due to Hurricane Andrew. In December 1993, the Company initiated a recapitalization plan pursuant to which the Selling Shareholder purchased a previously outstanding loan in the amount of approximately $23 million and the accrued interest thereon from the original holder at a discount. The Selling Shareholder ultimately exchanged the loan for Common Stock. The Company also sold certain of its subsidiaries which were no longer compatible with its future business plans, including its credit life subsidiary (for which the Company retains responsibility for certain policies and continues to run-off the remaining book of business), an insurance premium financing services subsidiary and a travel agency. In 1994, the Company reduced its net writings of personal lines business written in the States of Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. Continuing operating losses reduced the Company's shareholders' equity to $650,000 by the end of 1994; the Company suspended all underwriting operations in early 1995 and began a year-long process of non-renewing this business effective during the second quarter of 1995. During the first quarter of 1995, the Company received net proceeds of approximately $5.1 million from a Rights Offering. A loan to the Company by the Selling Shareholder was repaid during the second 14 quarter of 1996 with proceeds from a private transaction in which the Company issued 408,750 unregistered shares of Common Stock and options to acquire an additional 408,750 shares. In the third quarter of 1996, an investor group acquired 1,562,500 shares of Common Stock plus options to acquire an additional 1,562,500 shares of Common Stock. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations--Liquidity and Capital Resources." Beginning in 1995, the Company replaced the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and began an ongoing effort to recruit additional management. New management has taken a number of actions to stabilize and improve the Company's financial condition through significant cost reductions, the raising of new equity capital and a renewed emphasis on non-risk fee-based businesses. As a result of these actions and the relative stabilization of loss experience, the Company was profitable in 1995 and 1996 and resumed limited insurance underwriting activities for which it retains risk in 1996. For the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, the Company's total revenue was approximately $57.2 million, total net income was approximately $5.2 million and shareholders' equity increased to approximately $23.8 million. 15 USE OF PROCEEDS Based on an assumed offering price of $ per share, the net proceeds to the Company of the Offering are estimated to be approximately $ million (approximately $ million if the Underwriters' over-allotment option is exercised in full), after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. The proceeds derived from the sale of shares offered by the Company will be retained for general corporate purposes, including possible acquisitions. Although the Company regularly evaluates possible acquisition opportunities, it is not currently a party to any letter of intent or arrangement regarding any acquisition. The Company also will contribute a portion of the proceeds to one or more of its insurance company subsidiaries for statutory surplus as necessary to support insurance operations. The Company will not receive any proceeds from any sale of the shares of Common Stock offered by the Selling Shareholder. DIVIDEND POLICY There have been no dividends declared by the Company during the past five years, and the Board of Directors does not presently intend to pay any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. The declaration of cash dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors and is based on earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, regulatory constraints and other relevant factors. The ability of the Company to declare and pay cash dividends, as well as to pay any debt service, is dependent upon the ability of SCIC to declare and pay dividends to the Company. The payment of dividends by SCIC to the Company is restricted by the South Carolina Insurance Holding Company Regulatory Act. See "Risk Factors-- Dividend and Other Restrictions" and "Business--Regulation--Regulation of Dividends and Other Payments from Insurance Subsidiaries." 16 MARKET PRICE OF COMMON STOCK The following table sets forth the range of high and low closing prices as reported on The Nasdaq Stock Market. This table reflects a 1-for-4 reverse stock split of the Common Stock, which, pending shareholder approval, the Company anticipates will occur during the second quarter of 1997.
HIGH LOW ------- ------- 1995 First Quarter................................. $12 1/4 $ 3 1/2 Second Quarter................................ 5 3/4 3 Third Quarter................................. 4 1/8 3 Fourth Quarter................................ 8 3/4 1 3/4 1996 First Quarter................................. $17 $ 6 1/4 Second Quarter................................ 12 1/2 9 1/2 Third Quarter................................. 10 1/2 7 7/8 Fourth Quarter................................ 11 1/4 7 1/2 1997 First Quarter (through March 24, 1997)........ $ 8 1/4 $ 7 1/4
On March 24, 1997, the closing price of the Common Stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market was $7.25 per share (giving effect to the 1-for-4 reverse stock split). There were approximately 2,556 shareholders of record as of March 24, 1997. This number does not include beneficial owners holding shares through nominee or "street" names. 17 CAPITALIZATION The following table sets forth the capitalization of the Company as of December 31, 1996 and as adjusted to reflect the exercise of a purchase warrant by the Selling Shareholder and the sale of the 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock offered by the Company hereby (assuming an offering price of $7.25 per share):
DECEMBER 31, 1996 ----------------------- ACTUAL AS ADJUSTED ---------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) Total debt..................................................................... $ 0 $ 0 ---------- ----------- Shareholders' equity: Special Stock: no par value, authorized 5,000,000 shares, none issued or outstanding................................................................ -- -- Common Stock: $1.00 par value; 25,000,000 shares(1) authorized; 6,168,097 shares issued and outstanding; 7,214,561 shares issued and outstanding, as adjusted(2)................................................................ 6,168 Additional paid-in capital................................................... 54,050 Unrealized gain (loss) on investments........................................ (536) (536) Accumulated deficit.......................................................... (35,891) (35,391) ---------- ----------- Total shareholders' equity................................................. 23,791 ---------- ----------- Total capitalization..................................................... $ 23,791 $ ---------- ----------- ---------- -----------
- ------------------------ (1) Reflects an amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation increasing the authorized Common Stock from 12,500,000 to 25,000,000 shares, which, pending shareholder approval, the Company anticipates will occur during the second quarter of 1997. (2) Does not include, as of March 24, 1997, (i) 635,181 shares of Common Stock reserved for issuance upon the exercise of stock options outstanding on such date and (ii) 16,059 shares of restricted stock issued pursuant to the Company's stock plans. 18 SELECTED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA The following selected consolidated financial data of the Company are qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto incorporated by reference in this Prospectus. The selected financial data presented below as of the years ended December 31, 1992 through 1996 and for each of the fiscal years in the five-year period ended December 31, 1996 have been derived from the Company's consolidated financial statements which have been audited by Arthur Andersen LLP, independent accountants.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------- 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT PER SHARE AMOUNTS) STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: Revenues: Commission and service income............... $ 35,943 $ 41,625 $ 60,669 $ 49,572(1) $ 45,585 Property and casualty premiums.............. 117,172 55,331 14,718 10,384 7,186 Credit life premiums........................ 4,247 3,207 1,801 890 478 Net investment income....................... 9,973 5,455 5,321 3,176 3,006 Other interest income....................... 2,987 1,635 905 1,154 801 Realized gains (losses) on investments...... 7,040 1,969 (6,327) 164 (14) Other income................................ 4,019 4,697 2,673 843 151 ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- Total revenues............................ 181,381 113,919 79,760 66,183 57,193 ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- Expenses: Losses and loss adjustments................. --(2) --(2) 36,954 17,618 10,980 Policy acquisition costs.................... 35,709 17,628 5,538 3,794 1,777 Credit life benefits........................ 1,538 1,374 770 545 203 Interest expense............................ 1,853 2,527 321 308 174 Other operating costs and expenses.......... --(2) --(2) 55,222 42,768 39,014 ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- Total expenses............................ 213,989 128,930 98,805 65,033 52,148 ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- Income (loss) before income taxes and extraordinary item.......................... (32,608) (15,011) (19,045) 1,150 5,045 Provision (benefit) for income taxes.......... 58 (4,762) 29 (2) (131) Extraordinary item............................ -- 9,235 -- -- -- ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- Net income (loss)......................... $ (32,666) $ (1,014) $ (19,074) $ 1,152 $ 5,176 ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- Net income (loss) per share and common equivalent share............................ $ (17.42) $ (0.54) $ (6.89) $ 0.28 $ 0.90 ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- ------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- --------- Weighted average shares outstanding........... 1,875 1,875 2,767 4,181 6,382
DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------------- 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- BALANCE SHEET DATA: Total cash and investments......................... $ 161,769 $ 120,480 $ 61,868 $ 50,641 $ 42,944 Total assets....................................... 461,136 324,695 255,935 224,005 220,472 Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses................ 257,602 194,682 166,698 145,523 132,152 Debt............................................... 25,153 11,934 439 2,476 -- Shareholders' equity............................... 14,219 13,902 650 10,187 23,791 Book value per share............................... 7.58 7.41 0.18 2.44 3.86 STATUTORY SURPLUS(3)................................. $ 18,440 $ 17,352 $ (1,615) $ 9,301 $ 21,632
- ------------------------ 19 (1) As a result of a competitive bidding process, in October 1994, the Company was awarded a new contract with the SC Facility for a smaller block of business at lower rates. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business--Nonstandard Automobile Insurance Business--Industry Background." (2) Certain reclassifications were made to the expenses in 1994, 1995 and 1996 for unallocated loss adjustment expenses related to the Company's commission and service business units. This reclassification increased loss and loss adjustment expenses while decreasing other operating costs for the same amount. The data necessary to make this reclassification for 1992 and 1993 is not available. For comparison purposes, expenses for the five years ended December 31, 1996 without the effect of reclassification are shown below:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------- 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 ---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS) Expenses: Losses and loss adjustments...................... $ 125,451 $ 58,285 $ 33,408 $ 12,921 $ 6,372 Policy acquisition costs......................... 35,709 17,628 5,538 3,794 1,777 Credit life benefits............................. 1,538 1,374 770 545 203 Interest expense................................. 1,853 2,527 321 308 174 Other operating costs and expenses............... 49,438 49,116 58,768 47,465 43,622 ---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- Total expenses................................. $ 213,989 $ 128,930 $ 98,805 $ 65,033 $ 52,148 ---------- ---------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------
(3) Reflects the statutory surplus of SCIC, the Company's principal insurance subsidiary. 20 MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS The selected financial data contained herein and consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto incorporated by reference should be read in conjunction with the following discussion as they contain important information for evaluation of the Company's financial condition and operating results. OVERVIEW The Company provides automobile, flood and other property and casualty insurance services and products through independent agents primarily in the southeastern United States. The Company's largest source of revenue during 1994, 1995 and 1996 was derived from its role as one of three servicing carriers for the SC Facility. Other revenues are derived from acting as a servicing carrier for the NFIP, a MGA primarily for commercial lines and an excess and surplus lines broker as well as from storm claims adjustment and liability run-off management services. The following table shows revenues by the various lines of operations for the periods presented:
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31 ------------------------------- 1994 1995 1996 --------- --------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS) Current operations: Fee and service operations: SC Facility premiums-based fees.............................................. $ 21,415 $ 13,451 $ 14,556 SC Facility claims-based fees................................................ 17,706 14,343 10,638 Flood premiums-based fees.................................................... 10,250 9,408 8,340 Flood claims-based fees...................................................... 648 2,863 3,581 Other state facilities....................................................... 3,188 2,613 1,390 MGA.......................................................................... 7,094 6,734 6,170 Brokerage and other.......................................................... 368 160 910 Risk operations: Nonstandard automobile......................................................... -- -- 71 Assumed from pools and associations............................................ 2,275 1,232 5,819 --------- --------- --------- Total current operations......................................................... 62,944 50,804 51,475 Premiums from run-off risk operations............................................ 14,244 10,042 1,774 --------- --------- --------- Total...................................................................... $ 77,188 $ 60,846 $ 53,249 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- ---------
As one of three servicing carriers for the SC Facility, the Company earns commission and service income as a percentage of gross premiums written and also earns a fee on claims paid. Until October 1, 1994, the Company serviced the largest of three blocks of business for the SC Facility ("Block One"). As the result of a competitive bid process in 1994, the Company submitted the second lowest bid and was awarded a five year contract to service the second largest block of business ("Block Two") at lower rates than under its prior contract. However, the Company continued to process the remaining run-off of claims from Block One for losses incurred prior to October 1, 1994 at the rates provided under its prior contract. Premium-based fees under the new contract are 20.99% of gross premiums written (compared with a rate of 28.0% under its prior contract). The Company is responsible for paying all costs of processing the policies, including the payment to the Designated Agent that produced the business of a mandated 12% commission on gross premiums earned (which the Company recognizes in other operating costs and expenses). The Company earns claims fees in the amount of 10.98% of the gross amount of paid claims (compared with a 15.0% rate under its prior contract). The Company is responsible for paying all costs to process these claims, including adjusting expenses. However, the SC Facility reimburses the Company for legal expenses associated with processing these claims. 21 Until the fourth quarter of 1995, the Company served as a servicing carrier for the North Carolina Reinsurance Facility (the "NC Facility"). This contract was cancelled by the NC Facility as a result of regulatory concerns regarding the Company. The Company continues to write nonstandard automobile insurance on a voluntary basis in North Carolina, all of which it reinsures with the NC Facility. Beginning in July 1996, the Company expanded its participation in the South Carolina automobile insurance market to include writing and retaining nonstandard automobile insurance policies. These revenues were not significant during 1996. The Company is a servicing carrier for the NFIP. During 1994, 1995 and 1996, the Company recognized commission and service income for the policies it processes in the amount of 30.6% of gross premiums written. The Company's commission rate for 1997 is 30.6%, but would increase to 32.6% if the Company is able to increase policies in force, as defined by the NFIP, by 10%. Commission rates of up to 34.6% could apply if the growth in policies in force exceeds 10%. The Company is responsible for paying all costs associated with processing the policies, including a negotiated commission to the independent agent (which the Company recognizes in other operating costs and expenses). The Company also receives a fee on the claims paid on these policies in the amount of 3.3% of incurred claims and is reimbursed for the allocated LAE ("ALAE") associated with these claims according to a standard fee schedule. The Company also derives revenue from its role as a MGA for Generali -- U.S. Branch. While the Company performs all services and pays all costs (including the independent agents' commissions) related to underwriting and processing policies and claims, the policies are issued for Generali. The Company earns commission income as a percentage of premiums written. Revenues derived from pools and associations consist of mandated participation in various state associations due to the Company's participation in such states' markets. In 1996, the Company's operating results were affected by premiums and losses assumed from the NC Facility. The amount of risk business assumed by the Company in any given year is based upon its percentage of premiums ceded to the NC Facility in prior years, which is ultimately adjusted to reflect actual current year participation. The assumption of this risk business is reflected in the Company's reported premiums, losses and loss adjustment expenses incurred and policy acquisition costs. The Company continues to maintain reserves and pay significant claims with respect to its run-off operations. These run-off operations relate primarily to workers' compensation policies which the Company wrote through 1993 and general liability policies written by the Company prior to 1985 (which included contractors, environmental and toxic tort coverages, primarily in California) and personal lines policies written by the Company in the southeastern United States in the late 1980s and early 1990s. Claims incurred on these policies caused substantial losses to the Company during the past 10 years. Beginning in early 1995, the Company replaced its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer and began an ongoing effort to recruit additional management. New management has taken a number of actions to stabilize and improve the Company's financial condition through significant cost reductions, the raising of new equity capital and a renewed emphasis on fee-based businesses. As a result of these actions and the relative stabilization of loss experience, the Company was profitable in 1995 and 1996 and resumed limited underwriting activities in 1996. RESULTS OF OPERATIONS YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995 COMMISSION & SERVICE INCOME Commission and service income for the year ended December 31, 1996 decreased $3,987,000, or 8.0%, to $45,585,000 from $49,572,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. This decrease is due primarily to a decline of $3,705,000 in SC Facility claims-based fees as a result of the gradual reduction of 22 claims-based fees related to the delayed effect of the Company's new contract with the SC Facility. See "--Overview." Flood premium-based revenues for the year ended December 31, 1996 decreased $1,068,000, compared to the year ended December 31, 1995, due to a decrease in the amount of flood premiums serviced by the Company. However, this decrease was partially offset by a $718,000 increase to claims-based revenues due to a larger amount of flood claims during 1996. The cancellation of the contract with the NC Facility also accounted for decreased revenues in the amount of $1,108,000. PROPERTY AND CASUALTY PREMIUMS EARNED Net property and casualty premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 1996 decreased $3,198,000, or 30.8%, to $7,186,000 from $10,384,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. This decline is largely due to the suspension of retained risk business in the first half of 1995. The decline was partially offset by $5,819,000 of premiums which the Company was required to assume from pools and associations, the largest being the NC Facility, compared to $1,232,000 of such premiums assumed in 1995. See "--Overview." In 1996, the Company also continued to earn premiums on personal lines business written by the Company in the first half of 1995. Although the Company resumed limited insurance underwriting activities in July 1996, these activities generated $71,000 of earned premiums in 1996. CREDIT LIFE PREMIUMS EARNED Net credit life premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 1996 decreased $412,000, or 46.3%, to $478,000 from $890,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. The Company sold its credit life business in September, 1993. Under the sale agreement, the Company retained and continues to run-off the policies in force at the date of the sale. NET INVESTMENT AND INTEREST INCOME Net investment and other interest income for the year ended December 31, 1996 decreased $523,000, or 12.1%, to $3,807,000 from $4,330,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. This decrease is primarily a result of a decrease of $7,697,000, or 15.2%, in the Company's cash and investments from $50,641,000 at December 31, 1995 to $42,944,000 at December 31, 1996. This decrease is due to the Company's negative cash flow from operations in 1996 as the Company continued to pay claims on run-off businesses. See "--Liquidity and Capital Resources." Partially offsetting the reduction in cash and investments, the average yield on total cash and investments increased to 6.3% for the year ended December 31, 1996 from 5.9% for the year ended December 31, 1995. REALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS Realized gains (losses) on investments decreased $178,000 from a gain of $164,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995 to a loss of $14,000 for the year ended December 31, 1996. OTHER INCOME Other income for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995 was $151,000 and $843,000, respectively. Other income in 1995 included income from the settlement of a litigation. LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES Property and casualty loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred decreased $6,638,000, or 37.7%, to $10,980,000 from $17,618,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. This decrease largely corresponds to the decrease in property and casualty premiums earned and also reflects a smaller increase in the provision for prior year losses of $1,117,000 in 1996 as compared to $3,375,000 in 1995. See "Business--Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves." 23 POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS Property and casualty policy acquisition costs incurred decreased $2,017,000, or 53.2%, to $1,777,000 from $3,794,000 for the year ended December 31, 1996 compared to the year ended December 31, 1995. This decrease is due to the reduction in net premiums written. The decline was partially offset by the policy acquisition costs associated with the premiums the Company was required to assume from the NC Facility. CREDIT LIFE BENEFITS Credit life benefits incurred were $203,000 and $545,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The Company sold its credit life business in September, 1993. Under the sale agreement, the Company retained and continues to run-off the policies in force at the date of the sale. INTEREST EXPENSE Interest expense was $174,000 and $308,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively. The majority of the interest expense during both years consisted of interest on notes payable to one of the Company's principal shareholders. The Company repaid these notes in full on May 1, 1996. OTHER OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES Other operating costs and expenses for the year ended December 31, 1996 decreased $3,754,000 or 8.8%, to $39,014,000 from $42,768,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995, primarily a result of the Company's continuing efforts to maintain costs at a level appropriate to the associated revenue levels. A combination of reductions in occupancy costs, data processing costs, salary and employee benefit costs and agent commissions accounted for $2,114,000 of this decrease. Agent commissions included in other operating costs and expenses were $16,352,000 for the year ended December 31, 1996 and $16,774,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. INCOME TAXES Benefit from income taxes was $131,000 and $2,000 for the years ended December 31, 1996, and 1995, respectively. The 1996 income tax benefit resulted primarily from reversals of tax over accruals in prior years. During 1996 and 1995, the Company utilized net operating loss carry forwards to offset current income taxes in the amount of $1,590,000 and $329,000, respectively. YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1995 AND 1994 COMMISSION & SERVICE INCOME Commission and service income for the year ended December 31, 1995 decreased $11,097,000, or 18.3%, to $49,572,000 from $60,669,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994. This decrease is due primarily to a decline of $7,964,000 and $3,363,000 in SC Facility premiums-based fees and claims-based fees, respectively, resulting largely from the new contract effective in October, 1994. The effect of this new contract caused an immediate reduction in premium-based fees and a more gradual reduction over an approximate eighteen month period in claims-based fees. See "--Overview." Flood premium-based revenues for the year ended December 31, 1995 decreased $842,000, compared to the year ended December 31, 1994, due to a decrease in the amount of flood premiums serviced by the Company. However, this decrease was more than offset by a $2,215,000 increase in claims-based revenues due to a larger volume of flood claims during 1995 than 1994. 24 PROPERTY AND CASUALTY PREMIUMS EARNED Net property and casualty premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 1995 decreased $4,334,000, or 29.4%, to $10,384,000 from $14,718,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994. This decline is largely due to the suspension of retained risk insurance underwriting in the first half of 1995. CREDIT LIFE PREMIUMS EARNED Net credit life premiums earned for the year ended December 31, 1995 decreased $911,000, or 50.6%, to $890,000 from $1,801,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994. The Company sold its credit life business in September, 1993. Under the sale agreement, the Company retained and continues to run-off the policies in force at the date of the sale. NET INVESTMENT AND INTEREST INCOME Net investment and other interest income for the year ended December 31, 1995 decreased $1,896,000, or 30.5%, to $4,330,000 from $6,226,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994. This decrease is primarily a result of a decrease of $11,227,000, or 18.1%, in the Company's overall cash and investment position from $61,868,000 at December 31, 1994 to $50,641,000 at December 31, 1995. This decrease is due to the Company's negative cash flow from operations in 1995. See "--Liquidity and Capital Resources." Average yield on net investment income was 5.9% for both years. REALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS Realized gains (losses) on investments increased $6,491,000 from a loss of $6,327,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994 to a gain of $164,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. Due to negative cash flow from operations during 1994, the Company sold bonds in a period of declining values, resulting in realized losses in 1994. OTHER INCOME Other income for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994 was $843,000 and $2,673,000, respectively. Other income in 1995 included income from the settlement of a litigation. Other income for 1994 included $1,737,000 from operations of the premium financing and travel agency subsidiaries which the Company sold in February 1994 and March 1995, respectively, and a $650,000 gain on the sale of the Company's premium financing subsidiary. LOSS AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES Property and casualty loss and loss adjustment expenses incurred for the year ended December 31, 1995 decreased $19,336,000, or 52.3%, to $17,618,000 from $36,954,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994. This decrease corresponds in part to the decrease in property and casualty premiums earned and also reflects a smaller increase in the provision for prior year losses of $3,375,000 in 1995 as compared to $16,957,000 in 1994. See "Business--Loss and Loss Adjustment Expense Reserves." POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS Property and casualty policy acquisition costs incurred decreased $1,744,000, or 31.5%, from $3,794,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995 compared to $5,538,000 in the year ended December 31, 1994. This decrease is due to the reduction in net premiums written. 25 CREDIT LIFE BENEFITS Credit life benefits incurred were $545,000 and $770,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. The Company sold its credit life business in September, 1993. Under the sale agreement, the Company retained and continues to run-off the policies in force at the date of the sale. INTEREST EXPENSE Interest expense was $308,000 and $321,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. Almost all of the interest expense during both years consisted of interest on notes payable to the Selling Shareholder. The Company repaid these notes in full on May 1, 1996. OTHER OPERATING COSTS AND EXPENSES Other operating costs and expenses decreased $12,454,000, or 22.6%, for the year ended December 31, 1995, to $42,768,000 from $55,222,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994. This decrease was primarily a result of the Company's ongoing efforts to maintain costs at a level appropriate to the associated revenue levels. The largest component of the decrease was due to workforce reductions in early 1995. At December 31, 1995, the Company employed 268 full-time employees, compared to 407 at December 31, 1994. Salaries and employee benefit expenses were $10,676,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995, compared to $14,447,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994, a decrease of $3,771,000, or 26.1%. Additional savings were realized in the Company's data processing costs. The Company converted its SC Facility business and flood operations from PMSC to another data processing system in December 1994 and September 1995, respectively, reducing data processing expense from $3,450,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994 to $1,849,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995. Agent commissions included in other operating costs and expenses were $16,774,000 for the year ended December 31, 1995 and $18,948,000 for the year ended December 31, 1994. INCOME TAXES Provision (benefit) from income taxes was $(2,000) and $29,000 for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994, respectively. During 1995, the Company utilized net operating loss carryforwards to offset current income taxes in the amount of $329,000. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES Liquidity relates to the Company's ability to produce sufficient cash flow to fulfill obligations to pay claims, agent commissions and other operating expenses. Sources of liquidity include net income, premium collections, investment income, sales or maturities of investments and financing activities. The Company experienced negative cash flow from operations of $12,938,000 in 1996 (which was funded with existing cash and short-term investments), $21,711,000 in 1995 and $44,608,000 in 1994. Although the Company suspended risk-bearing insurance underwriting activities in 1995, the Company continued to pay losses and loss adjustment expenses totaling $24,584,000 in 1996, of which $16,267,000 were loss payments on prior year claims. During 1994, cash flows from operations were affected by disbursements of $26,500,000 for the settlement of all obligations to the Workers Compensation National Reinsurance Pool and a settlement of a dispute regarding the liabilities of a former subsidiary. Net cash used in investing activities in 1996 was $7,920,000 as $14,288,000 in new investments were acquired. The primary sources of cash for these new investments were $7,049,000 of investments that had matured or were sold and $6,873,000 from financing activities. During 1996, the Company continued to sell investments that were inconsistent with its current investment policy, which resulted in realized losses of $14,000. During 1995, the Company realized a $164,000 gain on its portfolio sales. In order to fund 26 negative cash flow from operations during 1994, the Company sold bonds resulting in realized losses of $6,327,000. Total cash and investments at December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 were $42,944,000, $50,641,000 and $61,868,000, respectively. At December 31, 1996, 6.2% of total investments were committed to cash and short-term investments, primarily money market funds and overnight repurchase agreements compared to 32.9% at the end of 1995. Investments in U.S. Treasury and U.S. Government notes represented 93.4% of the portfolio as of December 31, 1996 compared to 62.0% as of December 31, 1995. The Company does not currently own any non-investment grade debt securities. See "Business -- Investments." All debt securities are considered available-for-sale and are carried at market value as of December 31, 1996 and 1995. The market values of the debt securities were $536,000 below book value at the end of 1996, which was reflected as a reduction in shareholders' equity, compared to $401,000 above book value as of December 31, 1995. The weighted average maturity of the fixed maturity investments was 3.8 years as of December 31, 1996. Average net investment yields on the Company's cash and investments was 6.3% in 1996 and 5.9% in 1995. In January, 1995, the Company received proceeds from a rights offering in the amount of $5,321,000 and made a capital contribution of $5,000,000 to SCIC which prior to this contribution had negative statutory surplus. In addition, during the second quarter of 1995, the Selling Shareholder loaned the Company $2,000,000, which was contributed to SCIC's statutory surplus. In the third quarter of 1996, following receipt of regulatory approval, the Company sold 1,562,500 shares of unregistered Common Stock at a price of $4.00 per share to the Powers Group pursuant to a letter of intent entered into in the fourth quarter of 1995. The proceeds were used to make a $6,300,000 contribution to SCIC. In conjunction with this sale, the Company also issued to these investors stock options to acquire an additional 781,250 shares at the greater of $6.00 per share or the book value per share at the date of exercise, expiring December 31, 1998, and 781,250 shares at the greater of $8.00 or the book value per share at date of exercise, expiring December 31, 2000. During the first quarter of 1996, the Company sold 408,750 shares of its unregistered Common Stock at a price of $8.00 per share to the Avent Group. The proceeds of this stock sale were used to repay the $2,476,000 of notes payable which were due May 1, 1996. In addition, the Company has issued to this group stock options expiring December 31, 2000 to acquire an additional 408,750 shares at the greater of $10.00 per share or the book value per share at the date of exercise. SBIG is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. As a holding company, the primary sources of cash needed to meet its obligations, including principal and interest payments with respect to any indebtedness, is dividends and other permitted payments from its subsidiaries and affiliates. South Carolina insurance laws and regulations require a domestic insurer to report any action authorizing distributions to shareholders and material payments from subsidiaries and affiliates at least thirty days prior to distribution or payment except in limited circumstances. Additionally, those laws and regulations require the prior approval of the Director of Insurance of the State of South Carolina for the payment of any dividends by SCIC within any twelve-month period that exceed the greater of (i) 10% of SCIC's surplus as regards policyholders as of December 31 of the prior year or (ii) SCIC's statutory net income, not including realized capital gains or losses, for the prior calendar year. The Company's payment of cash dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors, upon approval of the Director of Insurance, and is based on its earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, and other relevant factors. If the ability of SCIC and the Company's other insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to the Company is materially restricted by regulatory requirements, it could affect the Company's ability to service its debt and/or pay dividends. In addition, no assurance can be given that South Carolina will not adopt statutory provisions more restrictive than those currently in effect. 27 The volume of premiums that the property and casualty insurance subsidiaries may prudently write is based in part on the amount of statutory net worth as determined in accordance with applicable insurance regulations. The NAIC has adopted RBC requirements for property and casualty insurance companies to evaluate the adequacy of statutory capital and surplus in relation to investments and insurance risks such as asset quality, asset and liability matching, loss reserve adequacy, and other business factors. The RBC formula is used by state insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify, for the purpose of initiating regulatory action, insurance companies that are potentially inadequately capitalized. Compliance is determined by the ratio of the companies' regulatory total adjusted capital to its authorized control level RBC (as defined by the NAIC). All four of the property and casualty insurance subsidiaries of the Company have December 31, 1996 ratios of total adjusted capital to RBC that are in excess of the level which would prompt regulatory action. The South Carolina Director of Insurance authorized the resumption of underwriting activities for which the Company retains risk on the condition that the Company maintain a ratio of net premiums written to statutory surplus of 0.85 to one. See "Business--Regulation." UTILIZATION OF NET OPERATING LOSS CARRYFORWARDS The Company has unused tax operating loss carryforwards and capital loss carryforwards of approximately $95,415,000 for income tax purposes. However, due to a "change in ownership" event that occurred in January, 1995, the Company's use of the net operating loss carryforwards are subject to limitations in future years of approximately $2,000,000 per year. In addition, these net operating loss carryforwards expire between 1999 and 2010. As a result of these limitations, the Company expects that it will not be able to utilize a majority of the net operating loss carryforwards. Net operating loss carryforwards available for use in 1997 is approximately $7,600,000 due to the tax losses incurred in 1995 subsequent to the date on which the change in ownership event occurred. See Note 6 to Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. 28 BUSINESS OVERVIEW The Company provides automobile, flood and other property and casualty insurance services and products through independent agents primarily in the southeastern United States. The Company's largest source of revenues derives from its role as one of three servicing carriers for the SC Facility, a state- sponsored plan which provides automobile insurance coverage outside of the voluntary market. The Company also is a leading provider and an original participant in the NFIP, a flood insurance program administered by the federal government. As a servicing carrier for the SC Facility and the NFIP, the Company receives commissions and fees for issuing, processing and administering policies as well as for claims adjustment, but reinsures all insurance risks with either the SC Facility or the NFIP, as applicable. The Company provides other fee-based services as a MGA for commercial insurance, primarily for commercial lines, and as an excess and surplus lines broker, and also offers storm claims adjustment and liability run-off management services. Recently, the Company began limited efforts to market and underwrite nonstandard automobile insurance on a retained risk basis. The following table sets forth certain information for the Company's current insurance operations and run-off risk operations for the periods indicated.
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1994 1995 1996 --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- ----------- GROSS NET GROSS NET GROSS PREMIUMS PREMIUMS TOTAL PREMIUMS PREMIUMS TOTAL PREMIUMS WRITTEN EARNED REVENUES(1) WRITTEN EARNED REVENUES(1) WRITTEN ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) CURRENT OPERATIONS Fee and Service Operations: SC Facility(2): Premiums/related fees...... $ 80,073 -- $ 21,415 $ 64,206 -- $ 13,451 $ 69,981 Claims-based fees.......... 0 -- 17,706 0 -- 14,343 0 Flood: Premiums/related fees...... 29,517 -- 10,250 28,576 -- 9,408 27,157 Claims-based fees.......... 0 -- 648 0 -- 2,863 0 MGA.......................... 25,388 -- 7,094 24,245 -- 6,734 18,676 Brokerage and Other(3)....... 13,485 -- 3,556 10,915 -- 2,773 7,342 Risk Operations: Nonstandard Automobile(4).... -- -- -- 2,381 -- -- 2,948 Assumed from Pools(5)........ 5,332 2,275 2,275 422 1,232 1,232 6,235 ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- Total Current Operations....... $ 153,795 $ 2,275 $ 62,944 $ 130,745 $ 1,232 $ 50,804 $ 132,339 ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- RUN-OFF RISK OPERATIONS(6)..... $ 18,728 $ 14,244 $ 14,244 $ 9,264 $ 10,042 $ 10,042 $ 710 ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- ----------- NET PREMIUMS TOTAL EARNED REVENUES(1) ----------- ------------- CURRENT OPERATIONS Fee and Service Operations: SC Facility(2): Premiums/related fees...... -- $ 14,556 Claims-based fees.......... -- 10,638 Flood: Premiums/related fees...... -- 8,340 Claims-based fees.......... -- 3,581 MGA.......................... -- 6,170 Brokerage and Other(3)....... -- 2,300 Risk Operations: Nonstandard Automobile(4).... 71 71 Assumed from Pools(5)........ 5,819 5,819 ----------- ------------- Total Current Operations....... $ 5,890 $ 51,475 ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- RUN-OFF RISK OPERATIONS(6)..... $ 1,774 $ 1,774 ----------- ------------- ----------- -------------
- ------------------------------ (1) Excludes revenues from investment income and other income. (2) As a result of a competitive bidding process in October 1994, the Company was awarded a new contract with the SC Facility for a smaller block of business at lower rates. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and "Business--Nonstandard Automobile Insurance Business--Industry Background." (3) Includes excess and surplus lines brokerage and other state facilities for which the Company acted as a servicing carrier and other fee service income. (4) In 1995, the Company continued to write nonstandard automobile insurance on a voluntary basis in North Carolina which is reinsured 100% with the NC Facility. (5) Consists of mandated participation in various state associations due to the Company's participation in such states' markets. (6) Reflects revenue derived from lines of business for which the Company is no longer writing new or renewal policies. It includes (i) run-off premiums from retained credit life business in force at the time the Company sold such business in September 1993, (ii) workers' compensation premiums through 1994 and (iii) premiums on certain personal line policies. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." 29 NONSTANDARD AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE BUSINESS INDUSTRY BACKGROUND Total private passenger automobile insurance premiums written by insurance carriers in the United States have been estimated by A.M. Best to be $122.2 billion, of which $1.5 billion was written in South Carolina, in 1995. South Carolina premiums consisted of approximately $968 million of automobile liability coverage and approximately $533 million of automobile physical damage coverage. Many states, including South Carolina, have state-sponsored plans to provide insurance to drivers who are unable to obtain insurance in the voluntary market. As of September 30, 1995, approximately 38% of all exposures in the State of South Carolina were insured through the SC Facility. The SC Facility was created on October 1, 1974, as a result of the South Carolina Automobile Reformation Act of 1974 (the "Facility Legislation"). The Facility Legislation created a pool of "Designated Agents" which are divided into three "blocks". The Designated Agents produce automobile liability insurance business exclusively for the SC Facility through one of three servicing carriers that each service a "block" of Designated Agents. In addition, voluntary automobile insurance companies may selectively reinsure policy risks with the SC Facility by ceding up to a maximum of 35% of their automobile liability premiums to the SC Facility. Of the policies ceded to the SC Facility, as of September 30, 1996, approximately 61% were written by voluntary insurance companies and approximately 39% were written through Designated Agents by the servicing carriers. The total written premium volume for private passenger policies in the SC Facility for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996 was approximately $455 million, and the total amount of written premium volume for private passenger policies of all Designated Agents for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996 was approximately $175 million. Servicing carriers contract with the SC Facility in exchange for a percentage of premiums written and claims handled. These carriers must pay the Designated Agents assigned to them a 12% commission on the premiums for policies written by them. Each servicing carrier reinsures 100% of the risks under such policies with the SC Facility. When a policyholder whose premium has been ceded to the SC Facility incurs a loss, the voluntary insurance company or servicing carrier that issued the policy adjusts the loss and is reimbursed for the loss and expenses by the SC Facility. Approximately 175 Designated Agents participated in the SC Facility as of September 30, 1996. Prior to October, 1994, the Company serviced the Designated Agents assigned to Block One, the largest of the three blocks. In 1994, the SC Facility for the first time instituted a bid and qualification process for each of the three blocks. The bidding was open to all qualified insurers, and successful bidders were awarded a five-year servicing contract beginning in October 1994. The Company submitted the second lowest bid and was awarded the contract to service Designated Agents assigned to Block Two. Block Two accounts for approximately one-third of both the Designated Agents and the gross premiums written through Designated Agents for the SC Facility. Block Two Designated Agents are primarily located in the Charleston area, Block One agents are primarily located in the Columbia area and Block Three includes agents located in the Greenville area. The Company has worked with the Designated Agents in each of the SC Facility's three blocks. From 1974 to 1994, the Company serviced the Designated Agents of Block One; since 1994, the Company has serviced the Designated Agents of Block Two; and since 1996, the Company has serviced the Designated Agents of Block Three in its capacity as a provider of run-off services for the previous Block Three servicing carrier. Throughout its history, the SC Facility has operated at a deficit. Total losses for private passenger automobile insurance policies in the SC Facility amounted to approximately $506 million for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996 for a loss ratio of 111% and a combined ratio of 144%. The deficit of the SC Facility is subsidized by all South Carolina drivers who are assessed a "recoupment fee" in addition to their insurance premium. These fees ranged from approximately $50 to approximately $3,900 per insured in 30 1996 based upon driving records. SC Facility loss ratios have been due, in large part, to the fact that automobile insurance premium rates for drivers insured by the SC Facility have been inadequate to support the SC Facility on a self-sustaining basis. However, the current South Carolina Director of Insurance has allowed physical damage premium rate increases aggregating approximately 62% in order to reduce the SC Facility's losses related to such risks. An increase in liability rates has not yet occurred. The South Carolina Senate recently passed reform legislation which, if enacted, would reorganize the SC Facility over a three-year transition period. In particular, this legislation would replace the SC Facility with either an assigned risk plan or a joint underwriter association ("JUA"), and Designated Agents would lose their designated status. An assigned risk plan typically assigns qualifying insureds to insurance carriers based on their premiums written in the voluntary market, while a JUA typically shares profits and losses related to qualifying insureds among the carriers participating in the JUA. This legislation was proposed in response to the SC Facility's significant deficits and the resulting subsidization of the SC Facility through recoupment fees paid by all South Carolina drivers. The Company believes that the proposed reorganization is likely to result in SC Facility rates increasing to a self-sustaining level, thereby triggering a voluntary exit from the SC Facility by insureds able to obtain more attractive rates in the voluntary market. Several reform bills also are currently pending before the South Carolina House of Representatives. Although certain of these bills would not reorganize the SC Facility, they would eliminate certain factors used in rating insured South Carolina drivers and recalculate the recoupment fees. The Company believes that enactment of any of these bills would likely result in higher SC Facility rates and a voluntary with-drawal of insureds from the SC Facility. If the South Carolina Legislature does not enact reform legislation with respect to the SC Facility, the Company believes that the Director of Insurance will allow premium rates for liability insurance to rise to approximate self-sustaining levels based on the recent increase in physical damage rates of approximately 62%. These rate increases may be effected through adjustments to criteria under the SC Facility Legislation which are within the purview of the Director. See "Risk Factors--Anticipated Changes in Automobile Insurance Business in South Carolina." In the event SC Facility rates are increased and insureds voluntarily withdraw from the SC Facility, the Company believes there will be an opportunity to attract such insureds to the Company's nonstandard automobile insurance products and, eventually, into standard and preferred automobile products. In particular, the Company believes that its Designated Agent relationships, its underwriting data and experience with the SC Facility and knowledge of the South Carolina automobile insurance market will allow it to obtain and underwrite additional business. See "Risk Factors--Re-entry into Risk-Bearing Activities." The voluntary automobile insurance market in most states includes three tiers of risks: preferred, standard and nonstandard. Nonstandard risk drivers are individuals who are unable to obtain insurance through standard market carriers due to factors such as poor premium payment history, limited driving experience, unsatisfactory driving records, automobile make or model or other restrictive underwriting criteria. Premium rates for nonstandard risks generally are higher and policy limits generally are lower than for preferred or standard risk drivers. Several factors influence the tiers of the automobile insurance business, including compulsory state insurance laws, premium rate regulation, market conditions for standard automobile insurance and state assigned risk (or residual market) plans. In cases where these factors have contributed to an unattractive market environment, certain insurance companies have ceased to underwrite personal automobile insurance, many have elected to write insurance for preferred or standard risks only and others have selectively withdrawn from certain states. In addition, the underwriting standards for preferred and standard risks have become more restrictive, thereby requiring more drivers to seek coverage in the nonstandard market. These and other factors have contributed to an increase in the size of the nonstandard automobile market nationwide. 31 According to statistical information derived from insurer annual statements compiled by A.M. Best, the nonstandard automobile market accounted for approximately $20.6 billion in total annual premium volume in the United States for 1995. Overall, based on information provided by A.M. Best, from 1990 through 1995, the nonstandard automobile segment grew from approximately 8.6% to approximately 14.5% of the total private passenger automobile market. In South Carolina, virtually all potential nonstandard automobile insurance business is written by the SC Facility, which had approximately $455 million in total written premium volume for private passenger coverages for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996. STRATEGY As discussed above, the Company expects that rates in the SC Facility will increase (whether as a result of legislative or administrative action), eventually resulting in insureds leaving the SC Facility. See "Risk Factors--Anticipated Changes in Automobile Insurance Business in South Carolina." In anticipation of these expected events, the Company has adopted a transition strategy designed to expand its risk-bearing automobile insurance business and increase the profitability of its current servicing carrier operations. To accomplish these objectives, the Company intends to: - EXPAND RETAINED-RISK AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE BUSINESS. The Company intends to expand its automobile business in South Carolina. In addition to increasing its existing physical damage coverage business, the Company plans to add liability coverage and will offer these insurance products to certain drivers voluntarily leaving the SC Facility. The Company also intends to write automobile insurance policies on a retained risk basis in North Carolina, where it currently writes nonstandard automobile liability insurance policies that are entirely ceded to the NC Facility. - CAPITALIZE ON EXISTING AGENT RELATIONSHIPS. The Company intends to capitalize on its agent relationships to expand its risk-bearing automobile insurance business. The Company has been a servicing carrier for the SC Facility since 1974 and, as a result, has established relationships with many of the SC Facility's Designated Agents. In addition, the Company intends to continue its efforts to develop relationships with independent agents in non-urban areas which the Company believes are often not developed by larger insurance companies. The Company also intends to utilize the relationships it currently has with independent agents in North Carolina to obtain profitable risks for underwritten automobile insurance products that it will offer in North Carolina. - DEVELOP MULTI-TIERED PRODUCTS FOR THE AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE MARKET. The Company is developing standard and preferred automobile insurance products for qualified insureds that the Company expects will exit the SC Facility. The Company also anticipates that other insureds who voluntarily leave the SC Facility will be upgraded to standard or preferred status once they meet the underwriting criteria. - CAPITALIZE ON EXISTING DATABASE. The Company has been adjusting and servicing automobile insurance policies for the SC Facility since 1974. As a result, the Company has extensive knowledge of the South Carolina automobile insurance market and has developed a substantial database of insureds. The Company believes that its database will be beneficial when considering various factors relevant in underwriting and pricing automobile insurance in South Carolina. In the event the SC Facility is depopulated, the Company believes that its database will provide it with an advantage over potential competitors in profitably underwriting automobile business in South Carolina. - REDUCE OPERATING EXPENSES RELATED TO SC FACILITY BUSINESS. The Company's current management intends to continue to reduce expenses related to the Company's SC Facility operations as well as improve service and increase productivity. In particular, the Company continues to upgrade its management information systems in order to improve communications with its Designated Agents. The Company recently created integrated customer service teams and is providing pay-for-performance incentives to its agents to improve productivity and service quality. 32 SERVICES AND PRODUCTS The Company offers automobile insurance as a servicing carrier to the SC Facility and, to a limited extent, on a retained risk basis where it retains underwriting gains and losses. Policies ceded to the SC Facility are written through Designated Agents and can include both liability and physical damage coverages. These policies have terms that range from 6 to 12 months; the majority have a term of 6 months. The SC Facility will only accept liability policies with accident limits of $15,000 to $250,000 for bodily injury coverage per person, $30,000 to $500,000 for bodily injury per accident and $5,000 to $50,000 for property damage or a combined limit of $500,000 per accident. Policies with greater limits cannot be ceded to the SC Facility. As a servicing carrier, the Company rates, issues, processes and administers the policies and adjusts claims on business produced by Designated Agents assigned to Block Two. The Company receives a fee based upon the premiums written as well as a fee based upon the claims that it adjusts. The Company also is managing the run-off of claims for Block Three resulting from business written before October, 1994 by the servicing carrier that formerly serviced Block Three. The Company selectively retains physical damage coverages on a risk-bearing basis for policies with terms of 6 to 12 months. The Company resumed underwriting nonstandard products on a retained risk basis in July 1996 by writing physical damage coverage for which it retained approximately 50% of the risk and reinsured approximately 50% of the risk under a quota-share reinsurance arrangement with unaffiliated reinsurers. On May 1, 1996, the Company also acquired a book of nonowners automobile insurance business for which it retains all of the risks. Nonowners insurance is sold to an individual with a limited- purpose driver's license (e.g., work-related driving only). In South Carolina, drivers must obtain nonowners insurance even if liability and physical damage coverage has already been obtained by the employer. The Company also writes nonstandard automobile liability insurance in North Carolina, all of which is reinsured with the NC Facility. The NC Facility will only accept liability policies with accident limits of $25,000 to $100,000 for bodily injury coverage per person, $50,000 to $300,000 for bodily injury coverage per accident, and $15,000 to $50,000 for property damage per accident. MARKETING The SC Facility requires Designated Agents to write private passenger automobile liability insurance through their assigned servicing carrier. As of September 30, 1996, approximately 175 Designated Agents participated in the SC Facility. The Company works with the Designated Agents assigned to Block Two of the SC Facility. As of September 30, 1996, approximately 65 Designated Agents were assigned to Block Two. Ten of the Designated Agents assigned to Block Two accounted for approximately 42.5% (six accounted for approximately 32.4%) of the gross premiums written for the SC Facility by the Company as of December 31, 1996. The Company intends to concentrate its risk-bearing activities in South Carolina, although management plans to expand selectively into additional states. The Company writes nonstandard automobile liability insurance through 95 independent agents in North Carolina, all of which is currently ceded to the NC Facility. The Company intends to write and retain certain automobile insurance coverages in North Carolina in 1997. The Company seeks to foster a loyal and close working relationship with its Designated Agents and independent agents in a variety of ways. The Company conducts quarterly Agents Advisory Council meetings to learn of, and respond to, the needs of its Designated Agents and is creating similar councils for its independent agents. The Company also is developing a program that will include underwriting training to assist its Designated Agents with the anticipated changes to the SC Facility. The Company actively engages in recruiting and training new independent agents as well. The Company also provides assistance to its independent agents through the use of seminars and underwriting training and field representatives 33 who consult with agencies on underwriting matters, assist agencies in research and accompany agents on marketing visits to current and prospective policyholders. The Company assists its independent agents with the processing of paperwork and other administrative services and provides automated services to selected agents. Independent agents generally are paid higher commissions than those employed directly by an insurance company, in part to account for the expenses of operating as an independent agent. The Company believes that the commissions it pays to its independent agents are competitive with the commissions paid by other insurance companies operating through independent agents. The Company also has established a stock option plan for certain eligible independent agents (including selected Designated Agents), which became effective on December 31, 1995. CLAIMS The Company's claims management unit employs approximately 90 full-time personnel who handle claims for both the SC Facility and the personal automobile risk-bearing business. In addition to claims handling teams, the Company's claims operation includes clerical, direct reporting, litigation, salvage/ automobile material damage ("AMD"), subrogation and systems teams. Claims are received and initially processed by the direct reporting team, which assigns them to a claims representative based upon loss type, severity and agent. Claims representatives review claims, obtain appropriate documentation, establish loss reserves for covered claims and negotiate and settle claims. Claims settlement authority levels are established for each adjustor and supervisor based on their expertise and experience. The Company processes all claims in-house with limited use of outside adjustors for specific task assignments. Outside adjustors have no authority to settle claims and are paid on a time and reasonable expenses basis. Outside appraisers are frequently used and are paid at prescribed rates. The AMD team reviews all appraisals in excess of $2,500. The Company recently terminated a claims supervisor after it discovered that he had falsified certain SC Facility-related claims information and documentation. The Company is conducting its own internal investigation as well as assisting investigations by the South Carolina Department of Insurance, the SC Facility and the South Carolina Attorney General. The Company estimates that the total amount of fraudulent claims was approximately $185,000. The SC Facility was improperly charged for certain of these fraudulent claims, which the Company will reimburse. The Company has a fidelity bond that is expected to pay for any losses that exceed $150,000. The Company has taken several steps to improve its internal security, including reestablishing a corporate internal audit function, testing and implementing several systems and work flow procedural enhancements, and conducting unannounced, random audits of closed and reopened files. There can be no assurance, however, that the Company will be able to prevent similar incidents of fraud in the future. UNDERWRITING A voluntary insurance company or servicing carrier (each, a "Facility Insurer") must appropriately rate and cede risks placed with the SC Facility. If a risk is improperly rated, the Facility Insurer must either increase the premium it charges the insured upon renewal of the policy or immediately refund any overcharged amount, whichever is applicable. The SC Facility examines a Facility Insurer's ratings of risks during annual underwriting audits and determines the Facility Insurer's error percentage. If a Facility Insurer's error percentage exceeds 15%, the Facility Insurer bears the cost of two additional audits and, if its error percentage remains above 15% after the second audit, is subject to losing its contract with the SC Facility. During the past five years, the Company's error percentage has consistently been under 10%. If a risk is improperly ceded to the SC Facility and a loss is incurred in connection with such risk, the SC Facility may refuse to cover such loss and, subject to an appeals process, the Facility Insurer will be solely responsible for the loss. 34 Although the Company must properly rate SC Facility-related business, underwriting activities on which the Company retains insurance risks currently are limited to a small amount of the nonstandard automobile physical damage business conducted in South Carolina. See "--Nonstandard Automobile Insurance Business--Marketing." The Company underwrites this business with the goal of achieving adequate pricing and seeks to classify risks into narrowly defined segments by using all available underwriting criteria and credible historical data. As of December 31, 1996, the Company had a combined nonstandard automobile insurance underwriting and processing staff of 12 employees. The Company generally utilizes many factors in determining its rates, including the number of vehicles, their type, age and location, driving experience, number and type of convictions or accidents, limits of liability, deductibles, and, where allowed by law, sex and marital status of the insured. Premium rates for automobile insurance generally are subject to the approval of state insurance departments. The rate approval process varies from state to state. FLOOD INSURANCE INDUSTRY BACKGROUND Policyholders obtain flood insurance to insure structures and personal property from flood damage. The federal government, through the Federal Emergency Management Agency, underwrites the National Flood Insurance Program, a federal flood insurance program. The NFIP offers flood insurance to owners of property located in flood-prone areas both directly and through the Write Your Own Program, which was created to increase the NFIP's policy base through the promotion and servicing of flood insurance by the private insurance industry. Flood insurance premium rates are set by FEMA based on the desired amount of coverage and the location of property in one of 70 flood zone areas. Insurance companies that participate in the WYO Program do not compete on price because FEMA establishes flood insurance premium rates, but do compete on commissions paid to agents and service provided to agents and policyholders. FEMA has estimated that approximately 40% of eligible properties are currently insured through the NFIP. The federal government, through legislation such as the National Flood Reform Act of 1994, has sought to increase participation of eligible properties in the NFIP in order to make the NFIP more actuarially sound and to mitigate federal disaster assistance, which is also administered by FEMA. In addition, as a result of legislation enacted in 1994, federally-backed mortgage loans currently require parties to obtain flood insurance for property located in a flood zone. As of September 30, 1996, the total number of NFIP policies was approximately 3.6 million, an increase of approximately 201,000 policies, or 5.9%, over the total number of NFIP policies in place at September 30, 1995. Total premiums written by all servicing carriers were approximately $1.18 billion and approximately $1.21 billion for the years ended September 30, 1995 and 1996, respectively. A servicing carrier for the NFIP receives a commission that ranges from 30.6% to 34.6% of the gross premiums written. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." In the event of a flood, a servicing carrier will handle claims on behalf of the NFIP, for which the carrier receives a fee of 3.3% of the claims paid plus reimbursement for loss adjustment expenses. See "--Flood Insurance--Claims." Total fees for claims paid under the NFIP were approximately $14.4 million and approximately $39.9 million for the years ended September 30, 1995 and 1996, respectively. As of September 30, 1996, 94 servicing carriers actively participated in the NFIP. The Company joined the NFIP as an original servicing carrier in 1983 and believes, based on NFIP data, that it was one of the ten largest flood servicing carriers in the NFIP for the fiscal year ended September 30, 1996. Although the Company is licensed to sell flood insurance in approximately 43 states, and has licensed agencies across the United States, its flood business primarily is concentrated in Florida, New Jersey, North Carolina and South Carolina. The Company also provides specialized catastrophe claims services to other flood insurers through its network of storm claims adjusters. See "--Other Business--Insurance Network Services." 35 STRATEGY One of the Company's business objectives is to increase its volume of flood insurance business through the expansion of its agent network. To accomplish this objective, the Company intends to: - EXPAND AGENT COVERAGE IN HIGH-VOLUME MARKETS. The Company has targeted several high-volume markets in which it intends to increase agent coverage for its flood business. In order to implement this plan, the Company has recently hired three marketing representatives to develop relationships with independent agents in these markets and educate them about the Company's flood operations and claims team. These representatives and certain of the Company's claims personnel also plan to make joint presentations to certain large national accounts. - PROMOTE PAST CLAIMS PERFORMANCE TO AGENTS. The Company intends to continue to promote its flood claims experience and capabilities. The Company believes that an important factor necessary for retaining its current agents and attracting new agents is its proven ability to provide reliable catastrophe claims services through its claims adjusting division, Insurance Network Services ("INS"). For example, in connection with Hurricane Fran in 1996, the Company adjusted over 3,000 claims, 1,800 on policies it services and 1,200 for other carriers, representing over $45 million in claims as of February 28, 1997. The Company also has expanded its storm claims adjustment capabilities by establishing a second claims team, which will allow the Company to respond to concurrent catastrophes and to devote greater claims resources for significant catastrophes. See "--Other Business--Insurance Network Systems." - STRENGTHEN RELATIONSHIPS WITH AGENTS. The Company intends to place terminals directly in the offices of selected agents. The Company expects that direct terminal placement will expand the agent's role in processing policies and will also attract "large agent" rollover packages from competitors. The Company believes that it is one of the few flood insurance servicing carriers that provides agents with the opportunity to participate in a stock option program. - PROVIDE BUNDLED PRODUCTS. The Company is developing a bundled product which will include flood mapping services, national flood insurance and access to excess flood insurance. The Company currently offers these services through arrangements with other companies. The Company believes that the convenience and competitive pricing of a bundled product will be attractive to its agents and other potential sources of flood insurance business. The Company also expects to allow policyholders to use credit cards to pay premiums. - DEVELOP STRATEGIC RELATIONSHIPS. The Company intends to increase its flood business by developing strategic relationships with financial institutions. In particular, the Company expects to attract those institutions that seek to outsource some of the flood insurance and ancillary services associated with loan origination. The Company believes that demand for flood insurance and related products by these institutions will increase because recent reform legislation requires that all properties subject to federally backed mortgages must be mapped for potential flood exposures before a loan is issued. PRODUCTS The NFIP policies written by the Company provide protection to policyholders for property damage resulting from floods, subject to limits of $250,000 on residential buildings, $500,000 on commercial risks and $100,000 and $500,000 for residential and non-residential contents, respectively. The Company also provides a free flood zone determination mapping service to its agents through arrangements with other companies. This service, often completed within 24 hours of receiving a request, provides the agent with the basic information needed to rate, quote and sell a flood insurance policy. In a brokerage capacity, the Company also offers excess flood insurance to policyholders. See "--Other Business--Excess and Surplus Operations." 36 MARKETING The Company markets its flood insurance products through a network consisting of approximately 1,200 independent agencies, who receive a commission on the premiums they write. The following table sets forth certain Company information for its top four states as well as the 39 other states in which the Company is licensed to sell flood insurance:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1994 1995 1996 -------------------------- -------------------------- ----------- YEAR NUMBER OF % OF PREMIUMS NUMBER OF % OF PREMIUMS NUMBER OF ENTERED(1) AGENCIES WRITTEN AGENCIES WRITTEN AGENCIES ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- ------------- ----------- Florida............................ 1983 417 50.9% 390 45.1% 342 North Carolina..................... 1983 202 9.8 202 11.0 204 South Carolina..................... 1983 148 10.0 156 10.7 200 New Jersey......................... 1984 113 7.0 117 8.7 136 39 Other States.................... Various -- 22.3 -- 24.5 1,129 % OF PREMIUMS WRITTEN ------------- Florida............................ 43.2% North Carolina..................... 11.4 South Carolina..................... 10.2 New Jersey......................... 9.4 39 Other States.................... 25.8
- ------------------------ (1) Represents year in which the Company commenced the sale of flood insurance policies in such state. While the NFIP directly markets flood insurance policies through independent agents, the majority of NFIP policies are written by servicing carriers. The Company believes that independent agents prefer to write flood policies through servicing carriers rather than directly with the NFIP because servicing carriers, including the Company, generally pay higher commissions. The Company also offers its independent agents the opportunity to participate in its stock option plan. The Company periodically reviews and terminates its agency relationships with non-producing or under-producing agents or agents that do not comply with its guidelines and policies for the sale of flood insurance. The Company provides assistance to its agents through the use of seminars, training and field representatives who consult with agents on various matters. The Company also provides certain agents with a software program that is designed to assist agents with premium calculations, flood quotes, the creation of insurance applications and the storage of data for requoting or correcting policies. Once the requisite application information data is entered, the software prints the application for the agent to sign, attach payment and mail to the Company. The Company provides its agents with flood zone determinations and also has installed zone determination software in certain agencies. CLAIMS Insurance claims on flood insurance policies are investigated and settled mainly by claims adjusters employed by INS. The Company also uses a network of independent adjusters located throughout the United States solely for investigation purposes; the Company makes all decisions concerning coverage and payments. The Company has utilized as many as 45 subcontracted adjusters at one time in the aftermath of Hurricane Fran in September 1996, and adjusted over 3,000 claims. Pursuant to a fee schedule issued by FEMA, independent adjusters receive a portion of the fees paid by FEMA for handling covered losses, while the Company receives the balance. For claims up to $50,000 in covered losses, FEMA pays a graduated fee up to approximately $800. For claims over $50,000 in covered losses, FEMA pays a percentage of such claim that ranges from approximately 3.0% to approximately 2.1%. See "--Other Business--Insurance Network Services." 37 CLAIMS Insurance claims on flood insurance policies are investigated and settled mainly by claims adjusters employed by INS. The Company also uses a network of independent adjusters located throughout the United States solely for investigation purposes; the Company makes all decisions concerning coverage and payments. The Company has utilized as many as 45 subcontracted adjusters at one time in the aftermath of Hurricane Fran in September 1996, and adjusted over 3,000 claims. Pursuant to a fee schedule issued by FEMA, independent adjusters receive a portion of the fees paid by FEMA for handling covered losses, while the Company receives the balance. For claims up to $50,000 in covered losses, FEMA pays a graduated fee up to approximately $800. For claims over $50,000 in covered losses, FEMA pays a percentage of such claim that ranges from approximately 3.0% to approximately 2.1%. See "--Other Business--Insurance Network Services." FEMA REPORTING REQUIREMENTS FEMA requires certain standards and procedures for the issuance, servicing and statistical reporting of all NFIP transactions conducted by its servicing carriers. Data is reported monthly, validated, audited in detail and compared and balanced against the servicing carrier's financial reports. The Company previously experienced problems in complying with FEMA's statistical reporting requirements. See "Risk Factors--Risks Associated with the National Flood Insurance Program." In an effort to rectify these problems, the Company recently entered into an outsourcing agreement with a major provider of processing services for the NFIP for the processing of its flood insurance business. This arrangement includes policy quotation and issuance, billing, claims processing, financial reporting and statistical reporting to the NFIP and eliminates the need for the Company to maintain and provide such specialized processing. As a result, the Company will be able to refocus its efforts on marketing and sales programs. MGA/COMMERCIAL LINES GENERAL In its capacity as a MGA, the Company sells commercial lines products, including commercial automobile insurance, commercial package policies, business owner policies ("BOP"), garage packages and umbrella policies. Commercial automobile coverage insures policyholders against losses incurred from bodily injury, bodily injury to third parties, property damage to an insured's vehicle (including fire and theft) and damage to other vehicles and property as a result of automobile accidents involving the insured's commercial vehicles. Commercial package policies provide insureds coverage on perils protecting real and personal business property combined with comprehensive general liability coverage. The BOP is a prepackaged "off-the-shelf" product for small to medium sized businesses that includes building, contents and liability coverages for business, while the garage package is tailored to provide specific coverages for garage owners. An umbrella policy provides additional excess third party liability protection. All of the Company's commercial business is currently underwritten by Generali-U.S. Branch pursuant to a MGA agreement. Generali is a member of the Generali Group of Trieste, Italy. The Generali Group had approximately $79.6 billion dollars in total assets as of December 31, 1995, and has an A.M. Best rating of A ("Excellent"). The Company sells, issues and performs underwriting and claims adjusting services for Generali's commercial lines products, for which Generali retains 100% of the risk, in Georgia, Kentucky, North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. The Company is paid on a commission basis. The Company has reduced the loss ratio on this business from 76% in 1995 to a range of approximately 61-64% in 1996, including allocated loss adjustment expense. The Company's contract provides for contingent commissions once stated loss ratio targets are achieved. 38 STRATEGY One of the Company's business objectives is to increase total revenue and net income attributable to its MGA/commercial lines business. To accomplish this objective, the Company intends to: - IMPROVE LOSS RATIO. The Company plans to continue its efforts to lower the loss ratio for the Generali business from its current mid-60s range to the mid-50s range, at which point the Company will qualify to receive contingent commissions from Generali. First, the Company is increasing enforcement of its underwriting guidelines by conducting reviews of its underwriting staff, confining underwriting activity to in-house personnel and phasing out policies that do not meet its underwriting guidelines. Second, Company employees will visit the premises of its insureds in order to identify, and recommend ways of curing potential loss exposures. Third, the Company is in the process of evaluating and, where appropriate, updating the pricing of its products. - REDUCE OPERATING EXPENSES. The Company seeks to reduce operating expenses further through increased automation and the restructuring program initiated for its claims and underwriting staff. The Company expects that improvements to its systems operations will reduce the number of employees required to administer its commercial lines policies. The Company also is continuing to implement a restructuring program to redesign the flow of work through its claims and underwriting staff. In particular, the Company recently reorganized its agency support staff to combine claims personnel and underwriting personnel into one servicing team. As a result of the restructuring, agents will be able to call one number for both claims and underwriting issues. The Company also believes that the combined group will have better access to historical claims data, resulting in better underwriting decisions. - ASSUME A PORTION OF THE RISK FOR PREMIUMS WRITTEN AND INCREASE THE SIZE OF THE COMMERCIAL LINES BUSINESS. The Company expects to begin assuming on a risk-bearing basis a 10-20% portion of its established commercial lines business currently underwritten 100% by Generali. Generali has indicated an interest in pursuing this objective, which would allow the Company to assume a portion of the risks written by Generali through the MGA relationship. - DEVELOP NEW NICHE PRODUCTS. The Company is continuing to develop insurance products that are tailored to specific needs of certain well-defined insureds (for example, garage package policies for owners of garages and parking lots). The Company also plans to increase the number of commercial automobile insurance products offered. In addition, the Company intends to introduce new payment plans that are flexible with respect to the timing and method of premium payment. The Company and Generali also have reached an agreement in principle to add multi-tier commercial lines products so as to offer pricing alternatives. - INCREASE AGENCY RETENTION AND RECRUITMENT. The Company intends to continue to strengthen its relationships with, and to recruit, agents that have demonstrated an ability to apply underwriting guidelines in the initial selection of insureds. For example, the Company plans to continue to encourage the participation of its successful agents in the Company's stock option program. For the year ended December 31, 1996, independent agents participating in the Company's stock option plan accounted for approximately $5.4 million, or approximately 30.8%, of the Company's total gross premiums for its MGA/commercial lines business. The Company also believes that improvements to automation facilitate the ease of doing business with the Company and increase agent participation in processing policies. In addition, the Company educates its agents on the new products and coverages it offers. MARKETING The Company markets its commercial lines insurance products through over 380 professionally-licensed, appointed independent agencies in its core states of North Carolina, Georgia, Kentucky, South 39 Carolina and Tennessee. Agents participate in continuing education programs and many have received such designations as Chartered Property Casualty Underwriter or Certified Insurance Counselor. In addition, each state sets continuing education requirements for maintaining an active agent's license with the state. The following table sets forth, as of or for the year ended December 31, 1996, as applicable, certain information regarding each of the states in which the Company conducts its Generali MGA business:
NUMBER GROSS % OF STATE OF AGENCIES PREMIUMS WRITTEN PREMIUMS WRITTEN - --------------------------------------------------------------- --------------- ----------------- ------------------- North Carolina................................................. 136 $ 5,834,000 32.6% Georgia........................................................ 86 2,083,000 11.6 Kentucky....................................................... 64 3,427,000 19.2 South Carolina................................................. 58 4,587,000 25.7 Tennessee...................................................... 40 1,955,000 10.9 --- ----------------- ----- Total...................................................... 384 $ 17,886,000 100.0%
CLAIMS The Company's MGA claims management unit employs approximately ten full-time personnel, including a team leader, a litigation manager and five multi-line adjusters with varying degrees of experience and authority (ranging from $5,000 to $50,000). The MGA contract gives the Company authority to settle claims up to $50,000; Generali must approve the settlement of claims in excess of $50,000, although the Company's staff remains responsible for the actual settlement of such claims. Outside adjustors and appraisers, which the Company will use when necessary, have no claims settlement authority. OTHER BUSINESS EXCESS AND SURPLUS LINES OPERATIONS The Company represents other insurance companies in both a MGA capacity and a brokerage capacity for excess and surplus lines operations. Excess and surplus lines insurance generally is written on classes of risks on which insurance is not available from an insurer licensed in the state where the risk is located. The Company has contracts with approximately 25 insurance companies selling products such as excess flood insurance, medium-haul trucking, general liability, professional liability and marine insurance. The Company earns a percentage of the premiums written for selling, issuing and servicing such policies, while retaining no risk. The Company markets products through approximately 1,500 independent insurance agencies in eight southeastern states. This business is marketed through traditional sales activities, convention exhibits, sales kits and advertisements, as well as through direct marketing campaigns. The Company seeks to grow this business by increasing product offerings and expanding into new markets. The Company also intends to offer its excess and surplus products in new states in which it is licensed and recently entered a new relationship that will enable the Company to provide additional automobile insurance products and property coverages. INSURANCE NETWORK SERVICES INS provides storm claims adjustment and "run-off" services. The storm claims adjustment service was developed to complement the Company's flood operations and is designed to maximize customer service in the event of a wind storm, flood or other catastrophe. This claims servicing activity has increased as a result of the widespread incidence of flood claims over the last several years. The Company seeks to 40 increase utilization of its established network of storm adjusters to service claims of other flood, wind and property insurers. INS also is developing a plan to expand its catastrophe service beyond floods to include other disasters. In addition, INS provides services to companies "running-off" discontinued books of business, leaving the region or in temporary need of services due to sharp increases in volume, usually due to seasonal demands, hurricanes or other catastrophes. INS investigates and settles insurance claims on policies through in-house claims adjustors and independent adjustors who are utilized in locations where there is insufficient claim volume to justify the cost of an internal claims staff, or when specialized claims expertise is required. These independent adjustors are paid a percentage of the income they produce and are required to carry errors and omissions insurance. Claims settlement authority levels are established for each adjustor and supervisor based on their expertise and experience. Upon receipt, each claim is reviewed and assigned to an adjustor based on the type and severity of the claim. The claims staff then reviews the claim, obtains appropriate documentation and establishes a loss reserve for covered claims. Home office review and approval is needed on all claims in excess of the established settlement authority of $50,000 for bodily injury and property damage. All claims-related litigation is monitored by the home office or a litigation manager. In addition, all environmental claims are handled by the home office. One of the Company's business objectives is to increase its INS claims service business. To accomplish this objective, the Company intends to continue the expansion of its claims adjusting services to include additional run-off management services for third party insurance companies. The Company is paid a fee for these services but does not assume any risk. To support this expansion, the Company has dedicated additional personnel to its run-off claims service operations. The Company also has improved its catastrophe-servicing capabilities by establishing a second claims team, which allows the Company to respond to concurrent catastrophes and to devote greater claims resources to significant catastrophes. The Company also is in the process of implementing new technology in an effort to improve the efficiency of its adjusters and reduce expenses of its claims service business. REINSURANCE Prior to suspending underwriting operations in the first quarter of 1995, the Company reinsured a portion of its risks. Business was ceded principally to reduce the Company's exposure on large individual risks and to provide protection against large catastrophic occurrences. Currently, the Company is not purchasing reinsurance for either of these types of exposures, but has outstanding claims recoverable under prior reinsurance agreements primarily on unpaid claims for liability exposures that take a lengthy period to settle. The Company's principal reinsurer under the prior agreements, in terms of the amount of reinsurance recoverable on incurred losses, is Swiss Reinsurance American Corporation. The Company currently reinsures 50% of its automobile physical damage business under a quota-share reinsurance agreement with a group of reinsurers led by Constitution Reinsurance Company. The Company cedes a portion of the premiums to the reinsurers net of a ceding commission and collects half of claims payments from the reinsurers. Quota-share reinsurance is designed to increase the capacity of the Company to write new business. Reinsurance does not legally discharge an insurer from its primary liability on the policies it issues, but it does make the assuming reinsurer liable to the insurer to the extent of reinsurance ceded. Therefore, the Company is subject to credit risk with respect to the obligations of its reinsurers. The Company evaluates the financial condition of each prospective reinsurer before it cedes business to that carrier. Reserves for uncollectible reinsurance are provided if deemed necessary. See "--Reserves for Losses and Loss Adjustment Expenses." 41 In its capacity as a servicing carrier, the Company issues policies for automobile and flood insurance, then reinsures 100% of these risks with the SC Facility, NC Facility and FEMA. While the amounts of reinsurance recoverables under these arrangements are significant, the Company believes these balances from the SC Facility, NC Facility and FEMA are fully collectible. SYSTEMS OPERATIONS The Company operates and maintains a computer system for its operations, including policy issuance, billing, claims processing, and financial and management reporting. The system utilizes networked personal computers and an IBM AS/400 computer for processing. The Company has entered into arrangements to provide computer processing support in the event the Company's data center is disabled. The disaster plan provides hardware, software and communications backup which will allow the Company to continue to operate with limited disruption in service. An insurance processing system is utilized by the Company for all lines of business, including flood, commercial and personal. The system provides support for all aspects of the Company's business, including policy rating and issuance, direct policyholder and agency billing, commission processing, management reporting and regulatory reporting. The Company has supplemented the system with other software in areas that require or can be aided by special support. The Company uses a financial reporting system for accounting support and for statutory and GAAP financial reporting. Automated data transfers have been established between the insurance processing and the accounting system. The accounting system is designed specifically for the unique reporting requirements of the insurance industry. A separate system is utilized by the specialty lines brokerage operation. The system provides the quotation, commission and sales accounting support requirements unique to the brokerage environment. The Company currently is installing an executive information system providing performance reporting capabilities for business profitability analysis and for risk/rate analysis and development. The Company believes that this system, which will report results by product, state, agent and risk characteristics, will become fully operational in the second quarter of 1997. FLOOD INSURANCE PROCESSING. The Company recently entered into an agreement with a major provider of processing for the NFIP to outsource the processing of its flood insurance business. This outsourcing arrangement includes policy quotation and issuance, billing, claims processing, financial reporting and statistical reporting to the NFIP, eliminating the Company's need to maintain and provide such specialized processing and allowing it to refocus its efforts on the support of its marketing and sales programs. AGENCY ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS. The Company provides selected agents with electronic connections to its systems, allowing agents to submit applications for insurance electronically. A few of the SC Facility Designated Agents electronically enter policy transactions into the Company's system. This electronic communication is provided to improve the service level to the consumer. The Company plans to enhance its electronic communication capabilities in 1997 to encompass over 70% of the facility business. In addition, selected high volume flood agents will be set up for electronic communications and processing. Approximately 20 other agencies electronically transfer new business applications and cancellations through an unaffiliated finance company. FUTURE SYSTEM ENHANCEMENTS. The Company will continue to evaluate enhancements to its systems. Improvements in agent and consumer service, new product offerings and reductions in administrative expenses will require ongoing enhancements to the Company's support systems. Current plans include establishing a data bridge between systems to eliminate redundant entry of policy information and reduce policy issuance time. This data bridge, associated with the Company's commercial business, is expected to be in place by the third quarter of 1997. The Company also expects to automate a Workers' Compensation product during the first half of 1997. This product will supplement the existing commercial lines offerings 42 in the Company's core states. In addition, support for policy audits will be enhanced in the second quarter of 1997 to support the workers' compensation product and to improve audit reporting and efficiencies. The Company plans to enhance its electronic communications with agents during 1997. For example, the Company expects to develop data transfer systems, which will allow agents to move data between their computer and the Company's computer, during the third and fourth quarters of 1997. In addition, the Company intends to expand current electronic interface capabilities for high volume flood and facility agents by the end of 1997. RESERVES FOR LOSSES AND LOSS ADJUSTMENT EXPENSES Loss reserves are estimates at a given point in time of the amount of claims that the insurer expects to pay claimants plus investigation and litigation costs, based on facts and circumstances then known. It can be expected that the ultimate liability in each case will differ from such estimates. During the loss settlement period, additional facts regarding individual claims may become known and, consequently, it may become necessary to refine and adjust the estimates of liability. The liability for losses is determined using case-basis evaluations and statistical projections. The liabilities determined under these procedures are reduced, for GAAP purposes, by estimated amounts to be received through salvage and subrogation. The resulting liabilities represent the Company's estimate of the ultimate net cost of all unpaid losses and LAE incurred through December 31 of each year. These estimates may be affected by the frequency and/or severity of future claims. Among the complications are a lack of historical data, long reporting delays, difficulty in properly allocating responsibility and/or liability for environmental damage, changes in underlying laws and judicial interpretation of those laws, potential for an environmental claim to involve many insurance providers over many periods, questions concerning interpretation and application of insurance and reinsurance coverage, and uncertainty regarding the number and identity of insureds with potential environmental exposure. These estimates are continually reviewed and as experience develops and new information becomes known, the liability is adjusted as necessary. The anticipated effect of inflation is implicitly considered when estimating liabilities for losses and LAE. While anticipated price increases due to inflation are considered, an increase in average severity of claims may be caused by a number of factors that vary with the individual type of policy written. Future average severity is projected based on historical trends adjusting for changes in underwriting standards, policy provisions and general economic trends. These anticipated trends are monitored based on actual developments and are modified as necessary. The Company does not discount its loss and LAE reserves. 43 The following table presents, on a GAAP basis, a three-year analysis of losses and LAE, net of ceded reinsurance recoverable, with the net liability reconciled to the gross liability as reported in the Company's financial statements:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------- 1994 1995 1996 ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Liability for losses and LAE at the beginning of the year: Gross liability per balance sheet.......................................... $ 194,682 $ 166,698 $ 145,523 Ceded reinsurance recoverable, classified as an asset...................... (76,221) (88,731) (84,492) ---------- ---------- ---------- Net liability.............................................................. 118,461 77,967 61,031 ---------- ---------- ---------- Provision for losses and LAE for claims occurring in the current year........ 19,997 14,243 9,863 Increase in estimated losses and LAE for claims occurring in prior years..... 16,957 3,375 1,117 ---------- ---------- ---------- 36,954 17,618 10,980 ---------- ---------- ---------- Losses and LAE payments for claims occurring during Current year............................................................... 13,837 11,711 8,317 Prior years................................................................ 63,611 22,843 16,267 ---------- ---------- ---------- 77,448 34,554 24,584 ---------- ---------- ---------- Liability for losses and LAE at the end of the year: Net liability.............................................................. 77,967 61,031 47,427 Ceded reinsurance recoverable, classified as an asset...................... 88,731 84,492 84,725 ---------- ---------- ---------- Gross liability per balance sheet.......................................... $ 166,698 $ 145,523 $ 132,152 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
The ceded reinsurance recoverable, classified as an asset, includes $75,674,000 at the end of 1994, $76,067,000 at the end of 1995 and $74,786,000 at the end of 1996 of balances recoverable from certain state and federal insurance facilities, including the SC Facility, NC Facility and the NFIP. See Note 12 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As reflected in the preceding table, each year was affected by reserves from prior years having been deficient in those earlier periods. However, the impact of adverse development has decreased significantly since 1994. The amount of adverse development related to claims occurring in prior years was $16,957,000 in 1994, $3,375,000 in 1995, and $1,117,000 in 1996. Reserve deficiencies are caused primarily by the difficulties inherent in estimating the liability for claims on the casualty lines of business, where the full extent of the damages can often be sizable but not accurately determinable at the date of estimation. This situation is further complicated by the fact that the existence of a claim may not be reported to the Company for a number of years. 44 The difference between the year-end net liability for losses and LAE reported in the accompanying consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that in accordance with SAP was as follows:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------- 1995 1996 ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Net liability on a SAP basis as filed in annual statement....................... $ 61,812 $ 47,952 Established salvage and subrogation recoveries recorded on a cash basis for SAP and on an accrual basis for GAAP.............................................. (781) (525) ---------- ---------- Net liability on a GAAP basis, at year end...................................... 61,031 47,427 Ceded reinsurance recoverable, classified as an asset........................... 84,492 84,725 ---------- ---------- Gross liability on a GAAP basis, at year end.................................... $ 145,523 $ 132,152 ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------
The following table reflects the loss and LAE development for 1995 and 1996 on a GAAP basis:
RE-ESTIMATED AS UNPAID LOSSES OF AND LAE ONE YEAR LATER DEFICIENCY ------------- ----------------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) 1995: Gross liability............................................... $ 145,523 $ 148,186 $ (2,663) Less reinsurance recoverable................................... 84,492 86,038 (1,546) ------------- -------- ----------- Net liability.................................................. $ 61,031 $ 62,148 $ (1,117) ------------- -------- ----------- ------------- -------- ----------- 1996: Gross liability............................................... $ 132,152 Less reinsurance recoverable................................... 84,725 ------------- Net liability.................................................. $ 47,427 ------------- -------------
45 The following analysis reflects loss and LAE development on a SAP basis, net of ceded reinsurance recoverable, for a ten-year period for retained business only:
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- (IN MILLIONS) Gross liability for unpaid losses and LAE................................... Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and LAE............................... Net liability for unpaid losses and LAE................................... $ 162 $ 145 $ 129 $ 122 $ 114 $ 112 $ 118 $ 120 Cumulative liability paid through: One year later........................ $ 94 $ 82 $ 104 $ 78 $ 77 $ 63 $ 30 $ 65 Two years later....................... 142 150 141 121 116 50 84 86 Three years later..................... 194 173 166 145 93 91 102 99 Four years later...................... 211 191 183 115 125 104 112 Five years later...................... 224 203 151 139 135 111 Six years later....................... 233 174 170 147 140 Seven years later..................... 208 191 176 151 Eight years later..................... 223 195 179 Nine years later...................... 226 199 Ten years later....................... 229 Net liability re-estimated as of: One year later........................ $ 181 $ 158 $ 174 $ 135 $ 136 $ 119 $ 129 $ 138 Two years later....................... 192 197 177 150 147 124 146 144 Three years later..................... 229 200 188 156 151 134 151 143 Four years later...................... 233 210 185 159 161 145 149 Five years later...................... 240 204 185 168 172 143 Six years later....................... 235 204 195 180 171 Seven years later..................... 235 213 206 178 Eight years later..................... 243 224 204 Nine years later...................... 253 222 Ten years later....................... 251 Net cumulative (deficiency)............. (89) (77) (75) (56) (57) (31) (31) (23) --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- --------- 1994 1995 1996 --------- --------- --------- Gross liability for unpaid losses and LAE................................... $ 169 $ 146 $ 133 Reinsurance recoverable on unpaid losses and LAE............................... (89) (84) (85) --------- --------- --------- Net liability for unpaid losses and LAE................................... 80 62 48 Cumulative liability paid through: One year later........................ $ 26 $ 16 Two years later....................... 42 Three years later..................... Four years later...................... Five years later...................... Six years later....................... Seven years later..................... Eight years later..................... Nine years later...................... Ten years later....................... Net liability re-estimated as of: One year later........................ $ 85 $ 63 Two years later....................... 87 Three years later..................... Four years later...................... Five years later...................... Six years later....................... Seven years later..................... Eight years later..................... Nine years later...................... Ten years later....................... Net cumulative (deficiency)............. (7) (1) --------- ---------
The preceding table presents the development of balance sheet liabilities on a SAP basis for 1986 through 1996. The top line of the preceding table shows the initial estimated liability on a SAP basis. This liability represents the estimated amount of losses and LAE for claims arising in years that are unpaid at the balance sheet date, including losses that have been incurred but not yet reported. The next portion of the table reflects the cumulative payments made for each of the indicated years as they have developed through time. This table has been adjusted for a modification made to 1994 paid losses on a GAAP basis, not recorded for statutory net losses incurred. On a statutory basis, the modification is a reclassification only and has no effect on income. In evaluating this information, it should be noted that each amount includes the effects of all changes in amounts for prior periods. This table does not present accident or policy year development data, which readers may be more accustomed to analyzing. Conditions and trends that have affected development of the liability in the past may not necessarily occur in the future. Accordingly, it may not be appropriate to extrapolate future redundancies or deficiencies based on this table. Establishing reserves is an estimation process and adverse developments in future years may occur and would be recorded in the year so determined. As a result of independent actuarial reviews of reserves as of December 31, 1994, the Company significantly increased its reserves for unpaid losses and LAE 46 related to prior years by $17.0 million in the fourth quarter of 1994. Since that time, the Company's operating results have not been as significantly affected by increases in reserves for incurred losses and loss adjustment expenses for claims occurring in prior years compared to the impact upon operating results for the year ended December 31, 1994. The adverse loss reserve development in 1986 through 1993 is primarily attributable to run-off on the claims of workers' compensation and general liability policies written primarily in Florida and California, which created substantial losses for the Company for the past 10 years. A part of the Company's reserve for losses and LAE is set aside for environmental, pollution and toxic tort claims. These claims relate to business written on the West Coast prior to 1986. On June 7, 1994, the Company settled a dispute with another insurance company relative to approximately 400 of these claims. Any future liability on these claims is limited to 50% of the direct loss and LAE paid. The Company's obligation to pay 50% of these claims will not begin until the other company has paid subsequent to June 7, 1994 $20,000,000 in losses and LAE, net of reinsurance. As of December 31, 1996, $4,200,000 of claims payments gross of reinsurance have been made by the other company under this agreement. A portion of the reinsurance on this business was placed with a reinsurer currently operating under the supervision of its state regulator. Estimates of the Company's liabilities take into account only amounts of reinsurance that the Company believes are recoverable. Substantial uncertainties are inherent in the establishment of appropriate reserves for property and casualty insurers. Such uncertainties are significantly greater in estimating reserves for environmental, toxic tort and other casualty claims which the Company continues to maintain. Among the complications are a lack of historical data, long reporting delays, difficulty in properly allocating responsibility and/or liability for environmental damage, changes in underlying laws and judicial interpretation of those laws, potential for an environmental claim to involve many insurance providers over many periods, questions concerning interpretation and application of insurance and reinsurance coverage and uncertainty regarding the number and identity of insureds with potential environmental exposure. Of the remaining environmental, pollution and toxic tort claims, the following activity took place during 1996: Pending, December 31, 1995............................................. 85 New claims advised..................................................... 16 Claims settled......................................................... 30 -- Pending, December 31, 1996............................................. 71 -- --
The policies corresponding to these claims were written on a direct basis. The Company has excess of loss reinsurance with company retentions through 1980 of $100,000 and of $500,000 after 1980. The claims are reserved as follows as of December 31, 1995 and 1996:
1995 1996 --------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS) Case reserves........................................................... $ 2,229 $ 3,170 IBNR reserves........................................................... 8,675 6,381 LAE reserves............................................................ 3,453 3,764 --------- --------- Total............................................................... $ 14,357 $ 13,315 --------- --------- --------- ---------
The above claims involve eight Superfund sites, five asbestos or toxic claims, six underground storage tanks and 52 miscellaneous clean-up sites. For this direct business there are usually several different insurers participating in the defense and settlement of claims made against the insured. Costs and settlements are pro-rated by either time on the risk or policy limits. 47 In estimating the liability for reported and estimated losses and adjustment expenses related to environmental and construction defect claims, management considers facts currently known along with the current state of the law and coverage litigation. Liabilities are recognized for known claims (including the cost of related litigation) when sufficient information has been developed to indicate the involvement of a specific insurance policy and when management can reasonably estimate its liability. In exposures on both known and unasserted claims, estimates of the liabilities are reviewed and updated continually. The potential development of losses is restricted by policy limits. Because only 71 claims remain open as of December 31, 1996, the exposure to significant additional development is less than when the claims were less mature. In addition, the likelihood of new claims being asserted for construction liability is lessened by the expiration of statutes of limitations since the last policy expired over ten years ago. INVESTMENTS The Company invests in securities and other investments authorized by applicable state laws and regulations. Investments are managed by a management committee comprised of the Chief Financial Officer, the Vice President of Strategic Planning and the Treasurer. The Company's cash and investments were distributed as follows at December 31, 1995 and 1996:
1995 1996 ---------------------- ---------------------- ASSET ASSET VALUES(1) % VALUES(1) % --------- ----------- --------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) U.S. government and government agencies and authorities.............. $ 31,416 62.0% $ 40,102 93.4% States, municipalities and political subdivisions.................... 993 2.0 115 0.3 Corporate bonds...................................................... 1,168 2.3 -- -- Redeemable preferred stocks.......................................... 4 -- -- -- --------- ----- --------- ----------- Total debt securities............................................ 33,581 66.3 40,217 93.7 Cash and short term investments...................................... 16,649 32.9 2,664 6.2 Equity securities.................................................... 377 0.7 35 0.1 Other long term investments.......................................... 34 0.1 28 -- --------- ----- --------- ----------- Total cash and investments........................................... $ 50,641 100.0% $ 42,944 100.0% --------- ----- --------- ----------- --------- ----- --------- -----------
- ------------------------ (1) Asset values represent market values at December 31. The following table sets forth the consolidated investment results for the three years ended December 31, 1996:
1994 1995 1996 --------- --------- --------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) Total investments(1)............................................................. $ 90,175 $ 53,841 $ 47,614 Net investment income............................................................ 5,321 3,176 3,006 Average yield.................................................................... 5.9% 5.9% 6.3% Net realized investment gains (losses)........................................... $ (6,327) $ 164 $ (14)
- ------------------------ (1) Average of the aggregate invested amounts (market values) at the beginning of the year, as of June 30 and as of the end of the year. As per its investment policy, the Company purchases only U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. agency securities and investment-grade municipal and corporate securities primarily with an "A" or higher rating 48 with the highest yield to maturity available. As of December 31, 1996, approximately 93.7% of the Company's total investments were fixed-income debt securities, of which 99.7% were securities of the United States Government or its agencies or instrumentalities, and all remaining bonds were rated "A" or better by either Moody's Debt Rating Service or Standard & Poor's Ratings Service. The Company generally buys investments maturing within two to twelve years of the date of purchase. At December 31, 1996, the average maturity of the Company's bond investment portfolio was 3.8 years. For additional information regarding the Company's investments, see Note 2 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 1994, 1995 and 1996, the composition of the Company's portfolio of debt securities by time to maturity.
AT DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 1994 1995 1996 ---------------------- ---------------------- ---------------------- PERCENT PERCENT PERCENT TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL MARKET MARKET MARKET MARKET MARKET MARKET TIME TO MATURITY VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE VALUE - ------------------------------------------------ --------- ----------- --------- ----------- --------- ----------- (DOLLARS IN THOUSANDS) 1 year or less $ 2,030 5.2% $ 3,102 9.2% $ 1,667 4.1% More than 1 year through 5 years................ 19,743 50.7 16,436 49.0 25,224 62.7 More than 5 years through 10 years.............. 14,167 36.4 12,520 37.3 13,142 32.7 More than 10 years.............................. 2,996 7.7 1,519 4.5 184 0.5 Redeemable Preferred............................ -- -- 4 -- -- -- --------- ----- --------- ----- --------- ----- Total....................................... $ 38,936 100.0% $ 33,581 100.0% $ 40,217 100.0% --------- ----- --------- ----- --------- ----- --------- ----- --------- ----- --------- -----
RATINGS The Company has elected not to be rated by A.M. Best and accordingly was last assigned a rating of NR-4 ("Not Rated--Company Request"). A.M. Best ratings represent an independent opinion of an insurers's financial strength and ability to meet policyholder and other contractual obligations. Such ratings are not directed toward the protection of investors or shareholders. A.M. Best classifications are A++ and A+ (superior), A and A- (excellent), B++ and B+ (very good), B and B- (fair), C++ and C+ (marginal), C and C- (weak), D (poor), E (under regulatory supervision), F (in liquidation) and S (rating suspended). COMPETITION The Company operates in highly competitive industry segments. Many of its competitors have significantly greater financial, marketing and underwriting resources and superior ratings from A.M. Best. These factors may significantly affect the Company's ability to market and profitably sell its products. In general, the Company competes with both large national writers and smaller regional companies in each state in which it operates. NONSTANDARD AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE BUSINESS. The other two servicing carriers for the SC Facility are Unisun Insurance Company ("Unisun") and Companion Property and Casualty Insurance Co. The Company competes with major carriers in the voluntary automobile insurance market, including State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Nationwide Mutual Life Insurance Co., Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance, Inc. and Allstate Insurance Company, Inc., as well as other regional insurance companies. See "Risk Factors--Re-entry into Risk Bearing Activities" and "Risk Factors--Competition." FLOOD PROGRAM. The Company's principal flood insurance competitors include Bankers Insurance Co., American Bankers Insurance Group, Omaha P&C Insurance Group, Selective Insurance Group, Inc., 49 Redland Insurance Co., Travelers Property-Casualty Insurance Co. and Unisun. Factors influencing the choice of a flood insurer or servicing carrier include the ability to offer homeowners or other property products to agents, a superior rating from A.M. Best, a competitor's ability to increase commission rates, on-line policy issuance capability, and credit card premium payment capability. OTHER BUSINESS. As a MGA for Generali, the Company competes with other MGAs and insurers seeking to write commercial lines business in Tennessee, Kentucky, North Carolina, Georgia and South Carolina. INS, primarily competes with the independent adjusting community. As a MGA and excess and surplus lines broker, the Company competes primarily with regional, privately held companies in eight Southeastern states. REGULATION STATE INSURANCE REGULATION. Insurance companies are subject to supervision and regulation in the jurisdictions in which they transact business, and such supervision and regulation relates to numerous aspects of an insurance company's business and financial condition. The primary purpose of such supervision and regulation is the protection of policyholders. The extent of such regulation varies but generally derives from state statutes which delegate regulatory, supervisory and administrative authority to state insurance departments. Accordingly, the state insurance departments have the authority to establish standards of solvency which must be met and maintained by insurers; license insurers and agents; impose limitations on the nature and amount of investments; regulate premium rates; delineate the provisions which insurers must make for current losses and future liabilities; require the deposit of securities for the benefit of policyholders; and approve policy forms. State insurance departments also conduct periodic examinations of the affairs of insurance companies and require the filing of annual and other reports relating to the financial condition of insurance companies. Most states, including South Carolina and Kentucky, have enacted legislation which regulates insurance holding company systems, including acquisitions, dividends, the terms of surplus notes, the terms of affiliate transactions and other related matters. Further, states often require prior regulatory approval of changes in control of an insurer and of intercorporate transfers of assets within the holding company structure. The purchase of more than 10% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock by one or more parties acting in concert requires the prior approval of the Insurance Departments of South Carolina and Kentucky and may subject such party or parties to the reporting requirements of the insurance laws and regulations of such states and to the prior approval and/or reporting requirements of other jurisdictions in which the Company is licensed. Three of the Company's insurance subsidiaries are domiciled in the state of South Carolina and are principally regulated by the South Carolina Department of Insurance. One subsidiary is domiciled in Kentucky and is principally regulated by the Kentucky Department of Insurance. Insurance companies are required to file detailed annual statements with the state insurance regulators in each of the states in which they do business, and their business and accounts are subject to examination by such regulators at any time. In addition, these insurance regulators periodically examine the insurer's financial condition, adherence to statutory accounting principles, and compliance with insurance department rules and regulations. South Carolina insurance laws, rather than federal bankruptcy laws, would apply to the liquidation or reorganization of the South Carolina insurance companies. Examinations of SCIC, Consolidated American and Catawba as of December 31, 1992 and of Kentucky Insurance Company as of June 30, 1996 have been completed. NAIC GUIDELINES. The NAIC has adopted RBC requirements for property and casualty insurance companies to evaluate the adequacy of statutory capital and surplus in relation to investment and insurance risks such as asset quality, asset and liability matching, loss reserve adequacy, and other business factors. The RBC formula will be used by state insurance regulators as an early warning tool to identify, for the purpose of initiating regulatory action, insurance companies that potentially are inadequately capitalized. Compliance is determined by the ratio of the Company's regulatory total adjusted capital to its 50 authorized control level RBC (as defined by the NAIC). Companies which fall below the authorized RBC level may be required to disclose plans to remedy the situation. As of December 31, 1996, all of the Company's insurance subsidiaries have ratios of total adjusted capital to RBC that are in excess of the level which would prompt regulatory action. INSURANCE REGULATORY INFORMATION SYSTEM. The NAIC Insurance Regulatory Information System ("IRIS") was developed primarily to assist state insurance departments in executing their statutory mandate to oversee the financial condition of insurance companies. Insurance companies submit data on an annual basis to NAIC, which analyzes the data using ratios concerning various categories of financial data. IRIS ratios consist of 12 ratios with defined acceptable ranges. They are used as an initial screening process for identifying companies that may be in need of special attention. SCIC has several ratios that fall outside of ranges considered acceptable by the NAIC. Companies that have several ratios that fall outside of the acceptable range are selected for closer review by the NAIC. If the NAIC determines that more attention may be warranted, one of several priority designations is assigned, and the insurance department of the state of domicile is then responsible for follow-up action. REGULATION OF DIVIDENDS AND OTHER PAYMENTS FROM INSURANCE SUBSIDIARIES. The Company is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiaries. As a holding company, the primary sources of cash needed to meet its obligations, including principal and interest payments with respect to indebtedness, are dividends and other statutorily permitted payments from its subsidiaries and affiliates. South Carolina insurance laws and regulations require a domestic insurer to report any action authorizing distributions to shareholders and material payments from subsidiaries and affiliates at least thirty days prior to distribution or payment except in limited circumstances. Additionally, those laws and regulations require the prior approval of the Director of Insurance of the State of South Carolina for the payment of any dividends by SCIC within any twelve-month period that exceed the greater of (i) 10% of SCIC's surplus as regards policyholders as of December 31 of the prior year or (ii) SCIC's statutory net income, not including realized capital gains or losses, for the prior calendar year. The Company's payment of cash dividends is at the discretion of the Board of Directors, upon approval of the Director of Insurance, and is based on its earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, and other relevant factors. If the ability of SCIC and the Company's other insurance subsidiaries to pay dividends or make other payments to the Company is materially restricted by regulatory requirements, it could affect the Company's ability to service its debt and/or pay dividends. In addition, no assurance can be given that South Carolina will not adopt statutory provisions more restrictive than those currently in effect. If insurance regulators determine that payment of a dividend or any other payments to an affiliate, because of the financial condition of the paying insurance company or otherwise, would be hazardous to such insurance company's policyholders or creditors, the regulators may disapprove, prohibit or mandate return of such payments that would otherwise be permitted without prior approval. REQUIRED PARTICIPATION IN STATE RESIDUAL MARKET PLANS. Most states in which the Company's property and casualty insurance group writes business have collective pools, underwriting associations, reinsurance facilities (the largest being the SC Facility and the NC Facility), assigned risk plans or other types of residual market plans (collectively, the "Plans"), pursuant to which coverages not normally available in the voluntary market are shared by all companies writing that type of business in that state. Participation is usually based on the ratio of the Company's direct voluntary business to the total industry business of that type in that state. As the Company's share of the voluntary market in a given state changes, tentative participations are assigned for each policy year and are updated as actual data becomes available which may lay behind changes in market share by two years or more. The required participation by the Company in all such Plans is reflected in the results of the Company as soon as such information is reported by the Plans. Estimates are maintained for unreported data. 51 REQUIRED PARTICIPATION IN INSURANCE GUARANTY FUNDS. Most states have also enacted insurance guaranty fund laws. Typically, these laws provide that when an insurance company is declared insolvent, the other companies writing the insurance in that jurisdiction are assessed amounts that pay covered claims of the insolvent company. The amount a company is assessed is generally determined by the amount of premiums written in that state, subject to a maximum annual assessment ranging from approximately 1% to 2% of direct written premiums. During 1995 and 1996, the Company paid $116,000 and $29,000, respectively, in such assessments. Because such assessments are typically not made for several years after an insurer fails and depend upon the final outcome of liquidation or rehabilitation proceedings, the Company cannot accurately determine the precise amount or timing of any future assessments. REGULATION OF SOUTH CAROLINA FACILITY AND SERVICING CARRIERS. The SC Facility created a pool of "Designated Agents," which are agencies usually comprised of a single independent agent who lost his or her access to the voluntary automobile market. Designated Agents are assigned to one of the SC Facility's servicing carriers. The SC Facility is an unincorporated, non-profit administrative service association of insurers. The SC Facility also provides a mechanism for insurance companies to cede mandated coverages under automobile policies. Every insurer authorized to write automobile liability insurance in South Carolina is required to participate in the SC Facility. When policyholders whose premiums have been ceded through the SC Facility incur a loss, the member company or servicing carrier which issued the policy adjusts the loss and subsequently is reimbursed for the loss and expenses by the SC Facility. Prior to October 1, 1996, the cession or retention of physical damage was dictated by whether or not the risk was "pointed" or "clean." Only clean risk physical damage could be ceded to the SC Facility prior to October 1, 1996. Effective October 1, 1996, however, physical damage was removed from the mandate, and the SC Facility agreed to accept any physical damage, pointed or clean, provided the SC Facility-filed rates were used. The current South Carolina Director of Insurance also allowed physical damage premium rate increases aggregating approximately 62% in order to reduce the SC Facility's losses related to such risks. An increase in liability rates has not yet occurred. The SC Facility has established a policy pursuant to which penalties are charged to member companies or servicing carriers for over-cession, late reported premiums and uncorrected transactions. The penalties are recorded as a balance due the SC Facility and, upon collection, are redistributed to the member companies or servicing carrier. With respect to policy cession, a case of overutilization may be established when a member, or a group of members under the same management, have ceded more than 35% of total direct cedeable written premium on South Carolina automobile insurance. In a particular calendar year, a member company which exceeds an excess of 35% of its total direct cedeable written premium on South Carolina automobile insurance is subject to an additional share of loss provision. The additional share of loss provision is calculated in the results of the SC Facility at the end of each fiscal year. NATIONAL FLOOD INSURANCE PROGRAM REGULATION. FEMA's Federal Insurance Administration manages the NFIP. The NFIP regulations established the "Financial Assistance/Subsidy Arrangement" pursuant to which the NFIP Administrator and the private sector insurers participate in the WYO Program. Under the WYO Program, insurers which are parties to a Financial Assistance/Subsidy Arrangement may issue in their own names a Standard Flood Insurance Policy, the form and substance of which is approved by the NFIP Administrator. Insurers are responsible for all aspects of service, including policy issuance, endorsements and renewals of policies and adjustments of claims brought under the policies, and the NFIP Administrator monitors the performance levels of all insurers participating in the WYO program. The Company is required to furnish to FEMA such summaries and analyses of information, including claims information, as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of the National Flood Insurance Act of 1968, as amended. See "Risk Factors--Risks Associated with the National Flood Insurance Program-- Systems Operations." Upon request, the Company is required to file with the Federal Insurance Administration true and correct copies of the Company's Fire and Casualty Annual Statement and Insurance Expense Exhibits which are filed with the state insurance authority of the Company's domiciliary state. 52 RECENT LEGISLATIVE PROPOSALS. Various bills that propose to reform the SC Facility are currently pending before the South Carolina State Legislature. See "Business--Industry Background--The SC Facility" and "Risk Factors--Anticipated Changes in the Automobile Insurance Business in South Carolina." The South Carolina Senate recently passed reform legislation which, if enacted, would reorganize the SC Facility over the course of a three-year transition period by creating a single residual market mechanism rate and providing all Designated Agents with access to the voluntary marketplace. Voluntary insurance companies or agents would not be able to cede any business to the SC Facility after March 1, 1998, and the Facility rate would be "capped" so that no more than a 10% rate increase each year would be allowed. Although the SC Facility would be phased out in 2001, the servicing carrier concept would continue and a single rate would be effective, commencing March 1, 1998, for all companies and agents. This rate would be based on the total experience of both the voluntary market and the Designated Agent book of business in the current SC Facility. It is not possible to predict whether or in what form this proposal might be adopted or the effect, if any, on the Company. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS The Company and its subsidiaries are parties to various lawsuits generally arising in the normal course of their insurance and ancillary businesses. The Company does not believe that the eventual outcome of any pending litigation will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition or results of operations of the Company. PROPERTIES The Company owns its Columbia, South Carolina home office, which contains approximately 148,000 square feet of occupied space. The Company uses the South Carolina home office primarily for its property and casualty insurance operations. Some additional premises are leased by the Company in locations in which they operate. Management believes that these facilities are adequate for the current level of operations. EMPLOYEES As of December 31, 1996, the Company and its subsidiaries employed 317 employees. The Company is not a party to any collective bargaining agreements and believes that relations with its employees are good. 53 MANAGEMENT DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE COMPANY The directors of the Company are divided into three classes and are elected to hold office for a three-year term or until their successors are elected and qualified. The election of each class of directors is staggered over each three-year period. See "Description of Capital Stock--Anti-takeover Provisions." All executive officers of the Company are elected for one year terms and serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors. The following table provides information regarding the executive officers and directors of the Company:
EXPIRATION OF TERM AS NAME AGE POSITION DIRECTOR OF THE COMPANY - ---------------------------- --- ----------------------------------------------------- ------------------------- John C. West................ 75 Chairman of the Board 1997 Ernst N. Csiszar............ 46 President, Chief Executive Officer and Director 1999 John A. Weitzel............. 51 Chief Financial Officer and Director 1999 Frank H. Avent.............. 56 Director 1997 William M. Barilka.......... 48 Director 1998 Fred S. Clark............... 60 Director 1997 Albert H. Cox, Jr........... 64 Director 1998 Claude E. McCain............ 72 Director 1998 Kenneth W. Pavia............ 54 Director 1998 Charles H. Powers........... 70 Director 1997 Walker S. Powers............ 42 Director 1997 John P. Seibels............. 54 Director 1999 George R.P. Walker, Jr...... 64 Director 1997
Biographical information for each of the individuals listed in the above table is set forth below. JOHN C. WEST has been Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1994 and has served as a director of the Company since 1994. Mr. West was the Governor of the State of South Carolina from 1971 to 1975, and currently serves as a professor at the University of South Carolina and as a practicing attorney. Mr. West also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette, Inc. ERNST N. CSISZAR has served as a director of the Company since 1995. Since June 1995, Mr. Csiszar has held the office of President and, since January 1996, the position of Chief Executive Officer of SBIG and all of its subsidiaries. He also continues to serve as a visiting professor at the School of Business, University of South Carolina, a position he has held since 1988. Prior to 1988, he served as Managing Director of Holborn Holdings Limited, an international merchant banking firm based in Geneva, Switzerland. JOHN A. WEITZEL has served as a director of the Company since 1995. Since September 1995, Mr. Weitzel has held the office of Chief Financial Officer of SBIG and all of its subsidiaries. From April 1985 to November 1994, he served as Chief Financial Officer of Milwaukee Insurance Group, Inc. From 1995, Mr. Weitzel acted as a consultant to SBIG. FRANK H. AVENT has served as a director of the Company since 1997. He is the President and General Manager of Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Florence, South Carolina, a position he has held since 1963. WILLIAM M. BARILKA has served as a director of the Company since 1994. He has served since 1991 as Chief Financial Officer of AGGAD Investment Company in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. From 1986 to 1991, Mr. Barilka was employed by the National Commercial Bank in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia in a variety of corporate finance positions. 54 FRED S. CLARK, ESQ. has served as a director of the Company since 1996. Mr. Clark has been a partner in the law firm of Clark and Clark in Savannah, Georgia for the past five years. ALBERT H. COX, JR. has served as a director of the Company since 1994. He is a consulting economist, formerly serving as Chief Economist of Feltman & Co., an Atlanta-based investment banking firm from 1995 through 1996. From 1985 to 1993, he held various executive positions, including as a member of the board of directors and Senior Economic Advisor with BIL Management, Inc., a subsidiary of the Bank in Liechtenstein. Prior to 1985, he held a number of positions with Merrill Lynch & Co. CLAUDE E. MCCAIN has served as a director of the Company since 1995. He is also Chairman of H.C. McCain Agency, Inc., President of McCain Realty, Inc., and President of Insurance Finance Company, Inc. He was formerly a member of the South Carolina State Insurance Commission for fifteen years, of which he served as Chairman for ten years. Mr. McCain has been in the insurance business since 1946. KENNETH W. PAVIA has served as a director of the Company since 1995. He is a general partner of Balboa Investments, a position he has held since 1992. He also holds the office of Chairman of FHI, Inc., a securities holding company, and Chairman of Fiduciary Leasco, Inc., a position he has held since 1985. CHARLES H. POWERS has served as a director of the Company since 1997. Mr. Powers owns and operates SADISCO Corporation, an automobile salvage company based in Florence, South Carolina ("SADISCO"). He is also a Vice President and Treasurer of Holland Grills, in Apex, North Carolina, and President of PC Inc., located in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. WALKER S. POWERS has served as a director of the Company since 1997. Mr. Powers has been a member of the management of SADISCO since 1975, and served as SADISCO's President from 1993 through 1994. JOHN P. SEIBELS has served as a director of the Company since 1969.(1) Mr. Seibels also serves as a member of the board of directors of PMSC, and he has been an investor based in Columbia, South Carolina since March, 1963. GEORGE R.P. WALKER, JR. has served as a director of the Company since 1969.(1) Mr. Walker has owned and operated Middlefield Farm (a Hanoverian horse farm) in Blythewood, South Carolina, for more than the past five years. - ------------------------ (1) Each present director of the Company with election dates prior to October 1978 (when the Company became the parent of SCIC) was formerly a Director of SCIC and the information set forth as to periods prior to 1978 reflects positions with SCIC and the year such Director was first elected to the SCIC Board of Directors. 55 PRINCIPAL AND SELLING SHAREHOLDERS The table below sets forth certain information regarding the beneficial ownership of the Company's Common Stock, as of March 24, 1997, by: (i) each person known to the Company to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of the Common Stock; (ii) each of the Company's executive officers and directors; (iii) all directors and officers of the Company as a group; and (iv) the shareholder of the Company who is offering shares in this Offering (the "Selling Shareholder"), both before and after giving effect to this offering.
SHARES OWNED BEFORE OFFERING OWNERSHIP AFTER OFFERING(1) ------------------------------------- SHARES ------------------------------------- NAME NUMBER PERCENTAGE OFFERED NUMBER PERCENTAGE - ---------------------- ---------------------- ------------- --------------- ---------------------- ------------- Alissa Group.......... 1,853,089(2) 29.7% 1,853,089 0 0% Frank H. Avent........ 520,000(3) 8.1 0 520,000(3) 6.9 William M. Barilka.... 36,250(4) * 0 36,250(4) * Fred S. Clark......... 3,902(5) * 0 3,902(5) * Albert H. Cox, Jr..... 4,000(6) * 0 4,000(6) * Ernst N. Csiszar...... 125,000(7) 2.0 0 125,000(7) 1.7 Claude E. McCain...... 3,766(6) * 0 3,766(6) * Kenneth A. Pavia...... 1,250(8) * 0 1,250(8) * Charles H. Powers..... 2,582,051(9) 34.7 0 2,582,051(9) 30.4 Walker S. Powers...... 500,000(10) 7.8 0 500,000(10) 6.5 John P. Seibels....... 152,977(6)(11)(12) 2.5 0 152,977(6)(11)(12) 2.1 George R. P. Walker, Jr.................. 127,964(6)(12)(13) 2.1 0 127,964(6)(12)(13) 1.8 John A. Weitzel....... 50,000(14) * 0 50,000(14) * John C. West.......... 128,525(15) 2.0 0 128,525(15) 1.8 All Directors and Executive Officers as a Group.......... 4,235,686 51.3% 0 4,235,686 45.5%
- -------------------------- * Represents beneficial ownership of less than 1% of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. (1) Except as indicated in the footnotes set forth below, the persons named in the table, to the Company's knowledge, have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them. All information assumes no exercise of the Underwriters' over-allotment option. See "Underwriting." The numbers shown include the shares which are not currently outstanding but which certain shareholders are entitled to acquire or will be entitled to acquire within 60 days. Such shares are deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage of outstanding Common Stock owned by the particular shareholder and by the group, but are not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. (2) Based on information contained in a Statement on Form 4 for December, 1996 (the "Form 4"): includes 473,750 shares for which Mr. Alissa has sole voting power; 72,664 shares, including 46,464 shares of Common Stock underlying a purchase warrant that will be exercised prior to this Offering, that are beneficially owned by Mr. Alissa through General Investors Ltd., a Cayman Island company ("GIL"), of which Mr. Alissa is the sole shareholder; 1,276,250 shares that are beneficially owned by Mr. Alissa through Abdullatif Ali Alissa Est. (the "Establishment"); and 30,425 shares that are beneficially owned by Mr. Alissa through Financial Investors Ltd., a Cayman Island company ("FIL"). The Form 4 indicates that Mr. Alissa is the President of the Establishment, that FIL is wholly-owned by the Establishment, and that GIL is wholly-owned by Mr. Alissa. The address of the Alissa Group is P.O Box 192, Alkhobar, Saudi Arabia. 56 (3) Includes 10,000 shares of Common Stock and 10,000 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options for which Mr. Avent has sole voting power and 250,000 shares of Common Stock and 250,000 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options as to which he has shared voting power beneficially owned (shared voting and dispositive power) by Pepsi Cola Bottling Company of Florence, South Carolina ("PepsiCo"). Mr. Avent has informed the Company that he is the President and General Manager of PepsiCo. Mr. Avent's address is P.O. Box 3886, Florence, South Carolina 29502. (4) Includes 2,500 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options. (5) Includes 1,525 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Clark's wife, and 960 shares of Common Stock held by his minor son. (6) Includes 2,500 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options. (7) Includes 125,000 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options. (8) Includes 1,250 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options. (9) Includes 1,250,000 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options. Mr. Powers' address is P.O. Box 6525, Florence, South Carolina 29502. (10) Includes 250,000 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options. Mr. Powers' address is P.O. Box 6525, Florence, South Carolina 29502. (11) Excludes 2,253 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Seibels' wife, of which shares he holds neither sole nor shared voting or dispositive power and, therefore, disclaims beneficial ownership. (12) George R.P. Walker, Jr. and John P. Seibels are cousins. (13) Excludes 11,389 shares of Common Stock held by Mr. Walker's wife, of which shares he holds neither sole nor shared voting or dispositive power and, therefore, disclaims beneficial ownership. (14) Includes 50,000 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options. (15) Includes 120,000 shares of Common Stock underlying certain options. 57 DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK The authorized capital stock of the Company consists of 25,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $1.00 (assuming the adoption of an amendment to the Company's Articles of Incorporation, which increases the authorized Common Stock from 12,500,000 to 25,000,000 shares, will occur during the second quarter of 1997), and 5,000,000 shares of Special Stock, no par value. There were issued and outstanding as of March 24, 1997, 6,190,569 shares of Common Stock, all of which are fully paid and nonassessable. No shares of Special Stock are outstanding. However, the Board of Directors of the Company could, without stockholder approval, issue Special Stock and establish the rights, privileges, and preferences thereof, including, but not limited to, dividend rights, convertibility features, redemption rates and prices, liquidation preferences, and voting rights. Such issuance could adversely affect the rights of the holders of shares of the Company's Common Stock. DIVIDEND RIGHTS Holders of the Common Stock and Special Stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as and if declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available therefor. However, the Board of Directors could provide, upon issuing Special Stock, that holders of Special Stock should receive dividends in preference to holders of Common Stock, or that no dividends be paid on Common Stock if dividends in full on all shares of Special Stock to which the holders thereof are entitled shall not have been paid or declared and set apart for payment. VOTING RIGHTS Holders of shares of the Common Stock are entitled to one vote per share and, subject to the voting rights, if any, of holders of Special Stock which may hereafter be issued, have the exclusive right to receive notice of shareholders' meetings and to vote thereat. Shareholders of the Company are allowed to cumulate their votes for the election of directors. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY OF DIRECTORS AND INDEMNIFICATION Section Six of Article Eight of the Company's By-laws limits the liability of its directors to the fullest extent that the General Corporation Law of the State of South Carolina permits. EXISTING ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS SOUTH CAROLINA CONTROL SHARE ACQUISITIONS ACT ("CSAA"). The Company is subject to the CSAA, which is intended to render it more difficult or to discourage an attempt to obtain control of the Company by merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. SOUTH CAROLINA BUSINESS COMBINATION STATUTE. South Carolina law regulates business combinations such as mergers, consolidations and asset purchases where the business acquired was, or the assets belonged to, a public corporation, such as the Company, and where the acquirer became an Interested Shareholder (as defined below) of the public corporation before a majority of the disinterested members of the Board of Directors of the public corporation approved either (i) the purchase resulting in such acquirer becoming an Interested Shareholder or (ii) the business combination. In the context of this law, an "Interested Shareholder" is any person who directly or indirectly, alone or in concert with others, beneficially owns or controls 10% or more of the voting stock of the public corporation, and a "disinterested" board member is a person who is neither a present nor a former officer or employee of the corporation. The law is very broad in its scope and is designed to inhibit unfriendly acquisitions. It does not apply to corporations whose Articles of Incorporation contain a provision electing not to be covered by the law. The Company's Articles of Incorporation do not contain such a provision. 58 The law prohibits business combinations with an unapproved Interested Shareholder for a period of two years after the date on which the person became an Interested Shareholder and requires that any business combination with an unapproved Interested Shareholder after such two-year period be approved by a majority vote of outstanding shares held by persons other than the Interested Shareholder or, alternatively, meet certain requirements that other shareholders receive at least a specified price for their shares. SUPERMAJORITY VOTING REQUIREMENTS. Article 9(k) of the Company's Articles of Incorporation requires a special vote of the shareholders to approve certain transactions, including, among other things, a merger or the sale, lease or exchange of substantially all of the assets (as therein defined) of the Company, with any shareholder owning at least 10% of the Company's equity securities. The approval of such transactions requires the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the holders of each class of equity securities of the Company entitled to vote thereon. The requirement of an 80% shareholder vote does not apply, however, to transactions approved by at least 75% of all the members of the Board of Directors. If such approval by the Board of Directors is obtained, the transaction generally would require approval by the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote, or as otherwise established by law. The Company's Articles of Incorporation further provide that Article 9(k) may not be amended, altered or repealed without the approval of the holders of 80% of the Company's shareholders unless 75% of the Board of Directors approves such a change, in which case approval by the holders of 66 2/3% of the Common Stock is required. CLASSIFIED BOARD OF DIRECTORS; REMOVAL OF DIRECTORS. The Company's Articles of Incorporation provide for the division of the Board of Directors into three classes of directors serving staggered three-year terms. As a result, approximately one-third of the members of the Board of Directors are elected each year. Pursuant to the Company's Articles of Incorporation, directors may be removed without cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote in the election of directors at a meeting called for that purpose at which 80% of the shares entitled to vote are represented. Directors may be removed for cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares entitled to vote in the election of directors at a meeting called for that purpose at which a majority of the shares issued, outstanding and entitled to vote are represented. Under South Carolina law, a director of the Company may not be removed from the Board of Directors if the number of votes sufficient to elect such director is voted against his removal. The classified Board and director removal provisions could have the effect of discouraging a third party from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of the Company, even though such an attempt might be beneficial to the Company and its shareholders. In addition, the classified Board and director removal provisions could delay shareholders who do not agree with the policies of the Board of Directors from removing a majority of the Board for two years, unless they can obtain the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares at a meeting at which 80% of the shares are present in person or represented by proxy, or they can show cause and obtain the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of the shares at a meeting at which a majority is present or represented. LIQUIDATION RIGHTS In the event of liquidation of the Company, holders of the Common Stock are entitled to share pro rata the net assets remaining after the payment of all amounts due creditors and such amounts, if any, as may be due to holders of any Special Stock then outstanding. PREEMPTIVE RIGHTS No holder of any of the Common Stock or Special Stock of the Company is entitled, as of right, to purchase or subscribe for any unissued shares of any class, or additional shares of any class, to be issued by 59 reason of any increase of the authorized capital stock of the Company of any class, or bonds, certificates of indebtedness, debentures, or other securities convertible into shares of the Company or carrying any right to purchase shares of any class. Any such unissued shares, or other securities convertible into shares or carrying any right to purchase shares, may be issued and disposed of, to such persons, firms, corporations, or associations and upon such terms as may be deemed advisable by the Board of Directors. TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR American Stock Transfer and Trust Company is the transfer agent and registrar for the Common Stock. SHARES ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE SALE Upon completion of this Offering, the Company will have 7,237,033 shares of Common Stock outstanding. Of these shares, the shares sold in this Offering will be freely tradable without restriction or further registration under the Securities Act, unless purchased by "affiliates" of the Company, as defined under the Securities Act. Of the Company's 7,237,033 shares of Common Stock that will be issued and outstanding after this Offering, shares will be freely tradeable without restriction or further registration and shares will be "restricted shares" under the meaning of Rule 144 and will be subject to restrictions under the Securities Act. In addition, the Company's officers and directors and certain shareholders, who upon completion of this Offering will own in the aggregate approximately 19,000,000 shares, and the Company have agreed not to sell, offer for sale, or otherwise dispose of any Common Stock for a period of 180 days from the date of this prospectus without the prior written consent of Advest, Inc. In general, under Rule 144, a person (or person whose shares are aggregated) who has beneficially owned restricted shares for at least one year, including a person who may be deemed an affiliate of the Company, is entitled to sell within any three-month period a number of shares of Common Stock that does not exceed the greater of 1% of the then-outstanding shares of Common Stock or the average weekly trading volume of the Common Stock on The Nasdaq Stock Market during the four calendar weeks preceding such sale. Sales under Rule 144 are subject to certain restrictions relating to manner of sale, notice and the availability of current public information about the Company. A person who has not been an affiliate of the Company at any time during the 90 days preceding a sale, and who has beneficially owned shares for at least two years, would be entitled to sell such shares without regard to the volume limitations, manner of sale provisions and other requirements of Rule 144. No prediction can be made of the effect that the sale or availability for sale of shares of Common Stock will have on the market price of the Common Stock. Nevertheless, sales of substantial amounts of such shares in the public market, or the perception that such sales could occur, could adversely affect the market price of the Common Stock and could impair the Company's future ability to raise capital through an offering of its equity securities. 60 UNDERWRITING Under the terms and subject to the conditions set forth in the Underwriting Agreement, the Underwriters named below, for whom Advest, Inc. and Scott & Stringfellow, Inc. are acting as the representatives (the "Representatives"), have severally and not jointly agreed to purchase from the Company and the Selling Shareholder the respective aggregate number of shares of Common Stock set forth opposite their names below, at the public offering price less the underwriting discounts and commissions set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus.
NUMBER OF UNDERWRITER SHARES - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- Advest, Inc...................................................................... Scott & Stringfellow, Inc........................................................ ---------- Total........................................................................ 2,853,089 ---------- ----------
The Underwriters are committed to purchase and pay for all the shares of Common Stock offered hereby (other than those shares covered by the Underwriters' over-allotment option described below) if any are purchased. The Underwriting Agreement provides that the obligations of the several Underwriters are subject to approval of certain matters by their counsel and to various other conditions. The Company and the Selling Shareholder have been advised by the Underwriters that the Underwriters propose to offer the shares of Common Stock directly to the public at the offering price set forth on the cover of this Prospectus and to certain dealers at such price less a concession not in excess of $ per share. The Underwriters may allow, and such dealers may reallow, a concession not in excess of $ per share to certain other dealers. After commencement of the Offering, the public offering price and other selling terms may be changed by the Underwriters. In the Underwriting Agreement, the Company and the Selling Shareholder have agreed to indemnify the Underwriters against certain liabilities that may be incurred in connection with the offering of Common Stock, including liabilities under the Securities Act. The Company has granted to the Underwriters an option, exercisable not later than 30 days after the date of this Prospectus, to purchase up to 427,963 additional shares of Common Stock solely to cover over-allotments, if any, at the price to public less underwriting discounts and commissions set forth on the cover page of this Prospectus. If the Underwriters exercise such option, the Underwriters have severally agreed, subject to certain conditions, to purchase approximately the same percentage thereof as the number of shares of Common Stock to be purchased by each of them as shown in the table above, bears to 427,963 shares of Common Stock and the Company will be obligated, pursuant to the option, to sell all of such shares to the Underwriters. If purchased, the Underwriters will sell such additional shares on the same terms as those on which the 2,853,089 shares are being sold. The Company, the Selling Shareholder, each of the Company's officers and directors and certain other shareholders have agreed not to sell any shares, for a period of 180 days after the date of this Prospectus, directly or indirectly, (i) offer, sell, contract to sell or otherwise dispose of any Shares of Common Stock or securities convertible in or exchangeable for Common Stock or (ii) enter into any swap or other agreement or transaction that transfers, in whole or in part, the economic consequences of ownership of shares of Common Stock whether any such swap or other agreement is to be settled by delivery of shares of Common Stock, other securities, cash or otherwise without the prior written consent of Advest Inc., as representative of the Underwriters. In addition, the Company has agreed that, for 180 61 days from the date of this Prospectus, it will not issue any shares of Common Stock except upon the exercise of stock options outstanding as of the date of this Prospectus. The Underwriters have informed the Company and the Selling Shareholder that the Underwriters do not intend to confirm sales to any accounts over which they exercise discretionary authority. The foregoing is a summary of the principal terms of the Underwriting Agreement and does not purport to be complete. Reference is made to a copy of the Underwriting Agreement which is on file as an exhibit to the Registration Statement. The Representatives, on behalf of the Underwriters, may engage in over-allotment, stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids in accordance with Regulation M under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Over-allotment involves syndicate sales in excess of the offering size, which creates a syndicate short position. Stabilizing transactions permit bids to purchase the underlying security so long as the stabilizing bids do not exceed a specified maximum. Syndicate covering transactions involve purchases of the Common Stock in the open market after the distribution has been completed in order to cover syndicate short positions. Such stabilizing transactions, syndicate covering transactions and penalty bids may cause the price of the Common Stock to be higher than it would otherwise be in the absence of such transactions. These transactions may be effected on The Nasdaq Stock Market or otherwise and, if commenced, may be discounted at any time. LEGAL MATTERS The validity of the shares of Common Stock offered hereby will be passed upon for the Company by King & Spalding, Atlanta, Georgia. Certain legal matters in connection with this Offering will be passed upon for the Underwriters by LeBoeuf, Lamb, Greene & MacRae, L.L.P., a limited liability partnership including professional corporations, New York, New York. In rendering such opinions, such firms will rely upon the opinion of Sinkler & Boyd, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, as to matters of South Carolina law. EXPERTS The financial statements and schedules of the Company as of December 31, 1996 and December 31, 1995 and for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1996, have been incorporated by reference herein in reliance upon the reports of Arthur Andersen LLP, independent public accountants, and upon the authority of said firm as experts in accounting and auditing in giving said reports. AVAILABLE INFORMATION The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act"), and in accordance therewith files reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission"). Such reports, proxy statements and other information filed by the Company may be examined without charge at, or copies obtained upon payment of prescribed fees from, the Public Reference Section of the Commission at Room 1024 Judiciary Plaza, 450 Fifth Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20549 and are also available for inspection and copying at the regional offices of the Commission located at Seven World Trade Center, Suite 1300, New York, New York 10048 and at 500 West Madison Street, Suite 1400, Chicago, Illinois 60661-2511. The Commission maintains a Web site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding the Company. In addition, the Company's Common Stock is listed on The Nasdaq Stock Market and such material also can be inspected and copied at the offices of the National Association of Securities Dealers, Inc., 1735 K Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20006. The Company has filed with the Commission a Registration Statement on Form S-2 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), and the rules promulgated thereunder, with 62 respect to the Common Stock. This Prospectus, which is part of the Registration Statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the Registration Statement and the exhibits and financial schedules thereto. For further information concerning the Company and the Common Stock, reference is made to the Registration Statement and the exhibits and schedules filed therewith, which may be examined without charge at, or copies obtained upon payment of prescribed fees from, the Commission and its regional offices at the locations listed above. Any statements contained herein concerning the provisions of any document are not necessarily complete, and, in each instance, reference is made to the copy of such document filed as an exhibit to the Registration Statement or otherwise filed with the Commission. Each such statement is qualified in its entirety by such reference. INCORPORATION OF CERTAIN INFORMATION BY REFERENCE The Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1996, heretofore filed with the Commission (File No. 0-08804) is incorporated herein by reference. All documents filed by the Company pursuant to Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act subsequent to the date of this Prospectus and prior to the termination of the Offering of the Common Stock shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and made a part hereof from the date of the filing of such documents. Any statement contained in a document incorporated or deemed to be incorporated by reference herein shall be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this Prospectus to the extent that a statement contained herein or in any other document subsequently filed with the Commission which also is deemed to be incorporated by reference herein modifies or supersedes such statement. Any such statement so modified or superseded shall not be deemed, except as so modified or superseded, to constitute a part of this Prospectus. The Company will provide without charge to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom this Prospectus is delivered, upon the written or oral request of such person, a copy of any or all of the documents incorporated by reference herein (not including the exhibits to such documents, unless such exhibits are specifically incorporated by reference in such documents. Requests for such copies should be directed to: The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc., 1501 Lady Street, Columbia, South Carolina 29201, Attention: Corporate Secretary; telephone: (803) 748-2000. 63 GLOSSARY OF SELECTED INSURANCE AND CERTAIN DEFINED TERMS Admitted Insurer.............. An insurance company licensed by a state regulatory authority to transact insurance business in that state. An admitted insurer is subject to the rules and regulations of each state in which it is licensed governing virtually all aspects of its insurance operations and financial condition. A non-admitted insurer, also known as an excess and surplus lines insurer, is not licensed to transact insurance busi- ness in a given state but may be permitted to write certain business in that state in accordance with the provisions of excess and surplus lines insurance laws which generally involve less rate and operational regulation. Adverse Loss Developments..... Increase in losses and loss adjustment expenses exceeding anticipated loss and loss adjustment expense experience over a given period of time. Allocated Loss Adjustment Allocated loss adjustment expense includes all legal Expense ("ALAE")............ expenses and other expenses incurred by a company in connection with the investigation, adjustment, settlement or litigation of claims or losses under business covered. ALAE does not include costs of "in-house" counsel, claims staff or other overhead or general expense of the insurer. A.M. Best..................... A.M. Best Company, Inc., a rating agency and publisher for the insurance industry. Assume........................ To accept from the primary insurer or reinsurer all or a portion of the liability underwritten by such primary insurer or reinsurer. BOP........................... Business owners policy; a prepackaged insurance product for business. Cede.......................... To transfer to another insurer (the reinsurer) all or part of the insurance written by an insurer (the "ceding insurer" or "ceding company"). Ceding Commission............. A commission (usually a percentage of the reinsurance premium) paid by the reinsurer to the ceding company. Combined Ratio................ The sum of the expense ratio and the loss ratio, determined in accordance with statutory accounting principles. A combined ratio under 100% indicates an underwriting profit and a combined ratio over 100% indicates an underwriting loss. Company (or SBIG)............. The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc., a South Carolina corporation, and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates otherwise. CPP........................... Commercial package policy; an insurance product that provides insures with coverage for real and personal business property combined with comprehensive general liability coverage. Designated Agents............. Insurance agents that write insurance for the SC Facility through one of the SC Facility's three servicing carriers. Direct writer................. An insurer or reinsurer that markets and sells insurance directly to its insured, either by use of telephone, mail or exclusive agents. Direct premiums written....... Total premiums collected in respect of policies issued by an insurer during a given period without any reduction for premiums ceded to a reinsurer.
64 Excess and Surplus A type of insurance that is generally written on classes of Insurance................... risks which admitted insurers will not write or which are too small in premium size for larger companies to handle efficiently. Because of the lack of availability of coverage from admitted insurers, premium levels for excess and surplus policies are generally higher than for standard coverages provided by admitted insurers. Excess of Loss Reinsurance.... A generic term describing reinsurance which indemnifies the reinsured against all or a specified portion of losses on underlying insurance policies in excess of a specified dollar amount, called a "layer" or "retention." Expense Ratio................. The ratio of commissions and other expenses incurred to premiums. The percentage of premium used to pay all the costs of acquiring, writing and servicing insurance and reinsurance. FEMA.......................... Federal Emergency Management Agency, a federal agency that administers the NFIP. General Liability Insurance... Coverage for an insured risk which causes bodily injury or property damage to others. Generally Accepted Accounting The method of accounting used for reporting to shareholders Principles ("GAAP")......... as defined by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants or the Financial Accounting Standards Board. Unless otherwise indicated, all financial information contained in this Prospectus is based on GAAP. Gross Premiums Written........ Direct premiums written plus premiums collected in respect of policies assumed, in whole or in part, from other insurance carriers. Incurred But Not Reported Claims under policies that have been incurred but have not ("IBNR") claims............. yet been reported to the Company by the insured. Incurred But Not Reported IBNR reserves include LAE related to losses anticipated from (IBNR) reserves............. IBNR claims and may also provide for future adverse loss development on reported claims. Liability Coverage............ Insurance coverage that compensates for damages for which the insured is legally liable, including as a consequence of negligent acts that result in injuries to other persons or damage to their property. Loss Adjustment Expense Expenses incurred in the settlement of claims, including ("LAE")..................... outside adjustment expenses, legal fees and internal administrative costs associated with claims adjustment process, but not including general overhead expenses. Loss and LAE Ratio............ The ratio of losses and LAE incurred to premiums earned. Loss and LAE Reserves......... Liabilities established by insurers to reflect the ultimate estimated cost of claim payments as of a given date. Loss Ratio.................... The ratio of claims incurred and the increase in policy reserves to premiums. Loss Reserve.................. Loss reserves are estimates at a given point in time of amounts that an insurer expects to pay in incurred losses based on facts and circumstances then known. The amount of loss reserves for reported claims is primarily based upon a case-by-case evaluation of the type of claim involved, the circumstances surrounding the claim, and the
65 policy provisions relating to the type of loss. The amount of loss reserves for unreported claims and case reserve development is determined on the basis of historical information and anticipated future conditions by lines of insurance and actuarial review. Loss reserves also include amounts for loss adjustment expenses. Managing General Agent or MGA......................... A fee-for-service arrangement wherein the agent sells and services insurance policies issued by an insurance company. NAIC.......................... The National Association of Insurance Commissioners. NC Facility................... The North Carolina Reinsurance Facility. NFIP.......................... The National Flood Insurance Program. Net Premiums Earned........... The portion of net premiums written applicable to the expired period of policies and, accordingly, recognized as income during a given period. Net Written Premiums.......... Total premiums for insurance written (less any return premiums) during a given period, reduced by premiums ceded in respect of liability reinsured by other carriers. Nonstandard Automobile Insur- Personal lines automobile insurance written for those ance........................ individuals presenting an above average risk profile (i.e., higher risk) in terms of payment history, driving experience, record of prior accidents or driving violations, particular occupation or type of vehicle and other factors. Physical Damage Coverage...... Insurance coverage that compensate for damage to the insured's automobile under the heading of "Collision" or "Comprehensive" coverage. Losses under physical damage coverage are generally limited to the value of the vehicle insured. Premiums...................... The consideration received by the Company pursuant to the terms of an insurance contract. Quota Share Reinsurance....... A generic term describing all forms of reinsurance in which the reinsurer shares an agreed percentage of both the original premiums and the losses of the reinsured. (Also known as pro rata reinsurance, proportional reinsurance, and participating reinsurance). Redundancy (Deficiency)....... Estimates in reserves change as more information becomes known about the frequency and severity of claims for each year. A redundancy (deficiency) exists when the original liability estimate is greater (less) than the re-estimated liability. The cumulative redundancy (deficiency) is the aggregate net changes in estimates over time subsequent to establishing the original liability estimate. Reinsurance................... A transaction in which one insurance company ("reinsurer") assumes all or part of an insurance risk undertaken originally by another insurer ("ceding insurer"), in exchange for consideration paid by the ceding insurer. Reserves...................... Estimated liabilities established by an insurer to reflect the estimated costs of claims payments that the insurer will ultimately be required to pay with respect to insurance it has written.
66 Residual Market............... The market consisting of those persons (most frequently drivers seeking automobile insurance) who are unable to obtain insurance coverage in the voluntary market. Risk-Based Capital............ The measure adopted by the NAIC and some states setting forth a methodology for assessing and reporting on the adequacy of the capital of insurers. Run-off....................... A discontinued line of business in which an insurance company continues to maintain reserves and pay claims although it is no longer writing new or renewal policies. SC Facility................... The South Carolina Reinsurance Facility, a legislatively mandated residual plan for high-risk nonstandard drivers in South Carolina. Specialty Lines............... A risk or a part of a risk for which there is no market available through admitted companies. Therefore, it is placed with non-admitted companies on an unregulated basis with regard to premium and form. Specialty lines are sometimes referred to as nonstandard or excess and surplus lines. Standard Automobile Personal lines automobile insurance written for those Insurance................... individuals presenting an average risk profile in terms of loss history, driving record, type of vehicle driven and other factors. Statutory Accounting Practices Accounting practices which consist of recording transactions (SAP)....................... and preparing financial statements in accordance with the rules and procedures prescribed or permitted by state regulatory authorities. Statutory accounting emphasizes solvency rather than matching revenues and expenses during an accounting period. Statutory Surplus............. The excess of admitted assets over total liabilities (including loss reserves), determined using data reported in accordance with SAP. Underwriting.................. The process whereby an insurer reviews applications submitted for insurance coverage and determines whether to provide all or part of the coverage being requested for an agreed premium. Underwriting Expense.......... As used in the definition of "Expense Ratio", the aggregate of policy acquisition costs and the portion of administrative, general and other expenses of an insurer attributable to underwriting operations. Unearned Premiums............. The portion of a premium representing the unexpired portion of the contract term as of a certain date. Voluntary Market.............. The market in which a person seeking insurance obtains coverage without the assistance of an assigned risk plan, joint underwriting association, reinsurance facility or similar mechanism, through an insurer of his or her own selection. WYO........................... The Write Your Own Flood Program of the NFIP.
67 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NO DEALER, SALESPERSON OR OTHER INDIVIDUAL HAS BEEN AUTHORIZED TO GIVE ANY INFORMATION OR TO MAKE ANY REPRESENTATIONS NOT CONTAINED IN THIS PROSPECTUS IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING COVERED BY THIS PROSPECTUS. IF GIVEN OR MADE, SUCH INFORMATION OR REPRESENTATIONS MUST NOT BE RELIED UPON AS HAVING BEEN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMPANY, THE SELLING SHAREHOLDER OR THE UNDERWRITERS. THIS PROSPECTUS DOES NOT CONSTITUTE AN OFFER TO SELL OR A SOLICITATION OF AN OFFER TO BUY ANY SECURITIES OFFERED HEREBY TO ANY PERSON TO WHOM IT IS UNLAWFUL TO MAKE SUCH OFFER IN SUCH JURISDICTION. NEITHER THE DELIVERY OF THIS PROSPECTUS NOR ANY SALE MADE HEREUNDER SHALL, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, CREATE ANY IMPLICATION THAT INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS CORRECT AS OF THE DATE HEREOF OR THAT THERE HAS BEEN NO CHANGE IN THE AFFAIRS OF THE COMPANY, THE SELLING SHAREHOLDER OR THE UNDERWRITERS SINCE SUCH DATE. ------------------------ TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE ----- Prospectus Summary............................... 3 Risk Factors..................................... 7 The Company...................................... 14 Use of Proceeds.................................. 16 Dividend Policy.................................. 16 Market Price of Common Stock..................... 17 Capitalization................................... 18 Selected Consolidated Financial Data............. 19 Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations............ 21 Business......................................... 29 Management....................................... 54 Principal and Selling Shareholders............... 56 Description of Capital Stock..................... 58 Shares Eligible for Future Sale.................. 60 Underwriting..................................... 61 Legal Matters.................................... 62 Experts.......................................... 62 Available Information............................ 62 Glossary of Selected Insurance and Certain Defined Terms.................................. 64
2,853,089 SHARES [LOGO] COMMON STOCK --------------------- PROSPECTUS --------------------- ADVEST, INC. SCOTT & STRINGFELLOW, INC. , 1997 - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PART II INFORMATION NOT REQUIRED IN PROSPECTUS ITEM 14. OTHER EXPENSES OF ISSUANCE AND DISTRIBUTION. The following table sets forth the fees and expenses in connection with the issuance and distribution of the securities being registered hereunder. Except for the SEC registration fee and NASD filing fee, all amounts are estimates. SEC registration fee............................................... $ 7,209 NASD filing fee.................................................... 2,879 Nasdaq National Market Listing Fee................................. 17,500 Accounting fees and expenses....................................... * Legal fees and expenses............................................ * Blue Sky fees and expenses (including counsel fees)................ * Printing and Engraving expenses.................................... * Transfer Agent and Registrar fees and expenses..................... * Miscellaneous Expenses............................................. * --------- Total........................................................ * --------- ---------
* To be provided by amendment ITEM 15. INDEMNIFICATION OF DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS. The South Carolina Business Corporation Act of 1988 (the "SCBCA") permits a corporation to indemnify an individual made a party to a proceeding because he is or was a director against liability incurred in the proceeding if (i) such individual conducted himself in good faith, (ii) in the case of conduct in his official capacity with the corporation, his conduct was in its best interest, and (iii) in the case of any criminal proceeding, he had no reasonable cause to believe his conduct was unlawful. The SCBCA does not permit a corporation to indemnify a director (x) in connection with a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation in which the director was adjudged liable to the corporation or (y) in connection with any other proceeding charging improper personal benefit to him, whether or not involving action in his official capacity, in which he was adjudged liable on the basis that personal benefit was improperly received by him. In connection with a proceeding by or in the right of the corporation, the SCBCA limits indemnification to reasonable expenses incurred in connection with the proceeding. The SCBCA also permits a corporation to indemnify its officers, employees and agents to the extent, consistent with public policy, that may be provided by its articles of incorporation, bylaws, general or specific action of its board of directors, or contract. Addendum Two to the Company's Articles of Incorporation, as amended, provides that a director of the Company shall not be personally liable to the Company or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director's duty of loyalty to the Company or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve gross negligence, intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 33-8-330 of the SCBCA (addressing director liability for unlawful distributions), or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit. Section Six of Article Eight of the Bylaws of the Company provides that the Company shall indemnify officers and directors of the Company and its subsidiaries to the extent permitted by South Carolina law and may insure such persons against liability arising out of or relating to their employment by the Company in an amount and according to such terms as the Board of Directors deems prudent. II-1 ITEM 16. EXHIBITS.
EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION - ----------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1.1* Underwriting Agreement 4.1* Specimen Common Stock Certificate 5.1* Opinion of King & Spalding as to the legality of the Common Stock being registered 10.1 Stock Purchase Agreement between registrant, Abdullatif Ali Est. and Saad A. Alissa, dated December 22, 1993, incorporated herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit (2)(1)-1, for the year ended December 31, 1993. 10.2 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated July 30, 1993, by and between National Teachers Life Insurance Company and South Carolina Insurance Company, incorporated herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit (10)(10)-2, for the year ended December 31, 1993. 10.3 The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc., Common Stock Warrant, dated February 4, 1993, incorporated herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit (10)(9)-3, for the year ended December 31, 1992. 10.4 The Seibels, Bruce & Company Employees' Profit Sharing and Savings Plan, dated June 30, 1992, as amended January 4, 1993, incorporated herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit (10)(9)-9, for the year ended December 31, 1992. 10.5 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated January 29, 1996, by and between the registrant and Charles H. Powers and Walker S. Powers, and amendment thereto, incorporated herein by reference to submission DEF 14-A, filing date May 10, 1996, file number 000-08804, accession number 0001005150-96-000127, accepted May 9, 1996. 10.6 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated January 30, 1996, by and between the registrant and Charles H. Powers, Walker S. Powers, and Rex and Jane Huggins, incorporated herein by reference to submission DEF 14-A, filing date May 10, 1996, file number 000-08804, accession number 0001005150-96-000127, accepted May 9, 1996. 10.7 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 28, 1996, by and between the registrant and Fred C. Avent, Frank H. Avent and Pepsico of Florence, incorporated herein by reference to submission Form S-2, filing date October 15, 1996, file number 33314123, access number 0000276380-96-00017, accepted October 15, 1996. 10.8 Stock Purchase Agreement, dated March 28, 1996, by and between the registrant and Junius DeLeon Finklea, Joseph K. Newsom, Sr., Mark J. Ross, Larry M. Brice, J. Howard Stokes, Winston Y. Godwin, IRA and Peter D. and Vera C. Hyman, incorporated herein by reference to submission Form S-2, filing date October 15, 1996, file number 33314123, access number 0000276380-96-00017, accepted October 15, 1996. 10.9 The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc. 1996 Stock Option Plan for Employees, dated November 1, 1995, incorporated herein by reference to submission DEF 14-A, filing date May 10, 1996, file number 000-08804, accession number 0001005150-96-000127, accepted May 9, 1996. 10.10 The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Independent Agents, dated June 14, 1996, incorporated herein by reference to submission DEF 14-A, filing date May 10, 1996, file number 000-08804, accession number 0001005150-96-000127, accepted May 9, 1996. 10.11 The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc. 1995 Stock Option Plan for Non-Employee Directors, dated June 14, 1996, incorporated herein by reference to submission DEF 14-A, filing date May 10, 1996, file number 000-08804, accession number 0001005150-96-000127, accepted May 9, 1996. 10.12 Agreement, dated October 1, 1994, by and between Catawba Insurance Company and the South Carolina Reinsurance Facility, incorporated herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.12, for the year ended December 31, 1996.
II-2
EXHIBIT NUMBER DESCRIPTION - ----------- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10.13 Managing General Agent Agreement, dated January 1, 1996, by and between Seibels Bruce & Company and Agency Specialty of Kentucky, Inc. and Generali--US Branch, incorporated herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.13, for the year ended December 31, 1996. 10.14 Arrangement, dated October 1, 1996, by and between Catawba Insurance Company, Kentucky Insurance Company and South Carolina Insurance Company and The United States of America Federal Emergency Management Agency, incorporated herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 10.14, for the year ended December 31, 1996. 11.1 Statement re: computation of per share earnings, for the year ended December 31, 1996, incorporated herein by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K, Exhibit 11.1, for the year ended December 31, 1996. 23.1* Consent of King & Spalding (contained in Exhibit 5.1) 23.2 Consent of Arthur Andersen LLP 24.1 Powers of Attorney (contained on signature page)
- ------------------------ * To be filed by amendment ITEM 17. UNDERTAKINGS. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes to deliver or cause to be delivered with the prospectus, to each person to whom the prospectus is sent or given, the latest annual report to security holders that is incorporated by reference in the prospectus and furnished pursuant to and meeting the requirements of Rule 14a-3 or Rule 14c-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and, where interim financial information required to be presented by Article 3 of Regulation S-X is not set forth in the prospectus, to deliver, or cause to be delivered to each person to whom the prospectus is sent or given, the latest quarterly report that is specifically incorporated by reference in the prospectus to provide such interim financial information. Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that: (1) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, the information omitted from the form of prospectus filed as part of this registration statement in reliance upon Rule 430A and contained in a form of prospectus filed by the registrant pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1) or (4) or 497(h) under the Securities Act shall be deemed to be part of this registration statement as of the time it was declared effective. (2) For the purpose of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each post-effective amendment that contains a form of prospectus shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof. II-3 SIGNATURES AND POWER OF ATTORNEY Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant certifies that it has reasonable grounds to believe that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form S-2 and has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the city of Columbia, state of South Carolina, on March 21, 1997. THE SEIBELS BRUCE GROUP, INC. By: /s/ ERNST N. CSISZAR ----------------------------------------- Ernst N. Csiszar PRESIDENT, CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND DIRECTOR KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Ernst N. Csiszar and John A. Weitzel, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, from such person and in each person's name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to the registration statement, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission and to sign and file any other registration statement for the same offering that is to be effective upon filing pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done as fully to all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue thereof. Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE - ------------------------------ -------------------------- ------------------- /s/ JOHN C. WEST - ------------------------------ Chairman of the Board and March 21, 1997 John C. West Director /s/ ERNST N. CSISZAR - ------------------------------ President, Chief Executive March 21, 1997 Ernst N. Csiszar Officer, and Director /s/ JOHN A. WEITZEL - ------------------------------ Chief Financial Officer March 21, 1997 John A. Weitzel and Director /s/ MARY M. GARDNER - ------------------------------ Controller (Principal March 21, 1997 Mary M. Gardner Accounting Officer) /s/ FRANK H. AVENT - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 Frank H. Avent
II-4
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE - ------------------------------ -------------------------- ------------------- /s/ WILLIAM M. BARILKA - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 William M. Barilka /s/ FRED S. CLARK - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 Fred S. Clark /s/ ALBERT H. COX, JR. - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 Albert H. Cox, Jr. /s/ CLAUDE E. MCCAIN - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 Claude E. McCain /s/ KENNETH W. PAVIA - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 Kenneth W. Pavia /s/ CHARLES H. POWERS - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 Charles H. Powers /s/ WALKER S. POWERS - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 Walker S. Powers /s/ JOHN P. SEIBELS - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 John P. Seibels /s/ GEORGE R.P. WALKER, JR. - ------------------------------ Director March 21, 1997 George R.P. Walker, Jr.
II-5 EX-23.2 2 EXHIBIT 23.2 EXHIBIT 23.2 CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS As independent public accountants, we hereby consent to the incorporation by reference in this registration statement of our report dated March 14, 1997, included in The Seibels Bruce Group, Inc.'s Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 1996 and to all references to our Firm included in this registration statement. ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP Columbia, South Carolina March 25, 1997 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----