XML 61 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurement
3 Months Ended
Jul. 01, 2012
Fair Value Measurement [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement

NOTE I — Fair Value Measurement

Goodwill represents the excess of the cost of businesses acquired over the fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed. CTS does not amortize goodwill, but tests it for impairment annually using a fair value approach at the reporting unit level. A reporting unit is the operating segment, or a business one level below that operating segment or the component level if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by senior management. However, components are aggregated as a single reporting unit if they have similar economic characteristics.

The table below summarizes the non-financial assets that were measured and recorded at fair value on a non-recurring basis as of July 1, 2012 and the loss recorded during the six months ended July 1, 2012 on those assets:

 

                                         

($ in thousands)

                             

Description

  Carrying Value
at July 1, 2012
    Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical

(Level 1)
    Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
    Loss for Six
Months
Ended
July 1,
2012
 

Goodwill

  $ 5,855     $ —       $ —       $ 5,855     $ —    

Intangible assets, other than goodwill

  $ 31,911     $ —       $ —       $ 31,911     $ —    

Long-lived assets

  $ 91,171     $ —       $ —       $ 91,171     $ 1,278  

The fair value of these assets were measured and recorded using an income approach. Projected future cash flows related to these assets were used under this approach to determine their fair values.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balance of CTS’ goodwill for the period ended July 1, 2012:

 

                             
($ in thousands)                  
    C&S     EMS     Total  

Balance at January 1, 2012

  $ —       $ 500         $ 500  

2012 first half activity — Note C, “Acquisitions”

    5,355       —             5,355  
   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

 

Balance at July 1, 2012

  $ 5,355     $ 500         $ 5,855  
   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

 

See Note L, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” for further discussion.

 

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of CTS’ intangible assets, other than goodwill for the period ended July 1, 2012:

 

         
($ in thousands)   Total  

Balance at January 1, 2012

  $ 29,886  

2012 addition — Note C, “Acquisitions”

    3,570  

2012 first half amortization expense

    (1,545
   

 

 

 

Balance at July 1, 2012

  $ 31,911  
   

 

 

 

See Note L, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets,” for further discussion.

The following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances of CTS’ long-lived assets for the period ended July 1, 2012:

 

         
($ in thousands)   Total  

Balance at January 1, 2012

  $ 84,860  

Capital expenditures

    6,877  

Capital expenditures to replace property, plant & equipment damaged in Thailand flood

    2,859  

Fixed assets acquired in Valpey-Fisher acquisition — Note C

    6,231  

Depreciation expense

    (8,101

Transfer to asset held for sale

    (350

Impairment charge

    (1,239

Foreign exchange impact and other

    34  
   

 

 

 

Balance at July 1, 2012

  $ 91,171  
   

 

 

 

The table below summarizes the financial liability that was measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of July 1, 2012:

 

                                         

($ in thousands)

  Carrying Value
at July 1, 2012
    Quoted Prices
in Active
Markets for
Identical

(Level 1)
    Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
    Significant
Unobservable
Inputs

(Level 3)
    Loss for
Quarter Ended
July 1, 2012
 

Interest rate swap — cash flow hedge

  $ 832     $ —       $ 832     $ —       $ —    

The fair value of CTS’ interest rate swaps were measured using a market approach which uses current industry information. There is a readily determinable market and these swaps are classified within level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. $79,000 of the fair value of these swaps are classified as Accrued liabilities and the remaining $753,000 are classified as Other liabilities on CTS’ Consolidated Balance Sheets.

CTS’ long-term debt consists of a revolving debt agreement. There is a readily determinable market for CTS’ revolving credit debt and it is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy as the market is not deemed to be active. The fair value of long-term debt was measured using a market approach which uses current industry information and approximates carrying value.