XML 63 R13.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Goodwill and Intangible Assets
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2012
Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Note 7 - Goodwill and Intangible Assets

The Company’s business acquisitions have typically resulted in the recognition of goodwill and other intangible assets. The Company follows the provisions under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 350, “Intangibles – Goodwill and Other” (“ASC 350”) as it relates to the accounting for goodwill in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements. These provisions require that the Company, on at least an annual basis, evaluate the fair value of the reporting units to which goodwill is assigned and attributed and compare that fair value to the carrying value of the reporting unit to determine if an impairment has occurred. The Company performs its annual impairment testing during the fourth quarter. Impairment testing takes place more often than annually if events or circumstances indicate a change in status that would indicate a potential impairment. The Company believes that there have been no events or circumstances which would more likely than not reduce the fair value for its reporting units below its carrying value. A reporting unit is an operating segment unless discrete financial information is prepared and reviewed by segment management for businesses one level below that operating segment (a “component”), in which case the component would be the reporting unit. In certain instances, the Company has aggregated components of an operating segment into a single reporting unit based on similar economic characteristics. At June 30, 2012, the Company had eleven reporting units.

When performing its annual impairment assessment, the Company compares the fair value of each of its reporting units to its respective carrying value. Goodwill is considered to be potentially impaired when the net book value of the reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair values are established primarily by discounting estimated future cash flows at an estimated cost of capital which varies for each reporting unit and which, as of the Company’s most recent annual impairment assessment, ranged between 8% and 17% (a weighted average of 11%), reflecting the respective inherent business risk of each of the reporting units tested. This methodology for valuing the Company’s reporting units (commonly referred to as the Income Method) has not changed since the adoption of the provisions under ASC 350. The determination of discounted cash flows is based on the businesses’ strategic plans and long-range planning forecasts, which change from year to year. The revenue growth rates included in the forecasts represent best estimates based on current and forecasted market conditions. Profit margin assumptions are projected by each reporting unit based on the current cost structure and anticipated net cost increases/reductions. There are inherent uncertainties related to these assumptions, including changes in market conditions, and management’s judgment in applying them to the analysis of goodwill impairment. In addition to the foregoing, for each reporting unit, market multiples are used to corroborate its discounted cash flow results where fair value is estimated based on earnings multiples determined by available public information of comparable businesses. While the Company believes it has made reasonable estimates and assumptions to calculate the fair value of its reporting units, it is possible a material change could occur. If actual results are not consistent with management’s estimates and assumptions, goodwill and other intangible assets may then be determined to be overstated and a charge would need to be taken against net earnings. Furthermore, in order to evaluate the sensitivity of the fair value calculations on the goodwill impairment test performed during the fourth quarter of 2011, the Company applied a hypothetical, reasonably possible 10% decrease to the fair values of each reporting unit. The effects of this hypothetical 10% decrease would still result in the fair value calculation exceeding the carrying value for each reporting unit.

 

Changes to goodwill are as follows:

 

(in thousands)    Six Months Ended
June  30,

2012
    Year Ended
December 31,

2011
 

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 820,824      $ 810,285   

Additions

     —          10,900   

Disposals

     (13,966     —     

Adjustments to purchase price allocations

     —          3,932   

Currency translation

     (688     (4,293
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 806,170      $ 820,824   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the disposals represent goodwill associated with the Company’s divested businesses. See discussion in Note 3 on discontinued operations for further details. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the additions to goodwill represent the initial purchase price allocation related to WTA, and the adjustments to purchase price allocations pertain to the December 2010 acquisition of Money Controls and the February 2010 acquisition of Merrimac Industries, Inc. (“Merrimac”).

Changes to intangible assets are as follows:

 

(in thousands)    Six Months Ended
June  30,

2012
    Year Ended
December 31,

2011
 

Balance at beginning of period, net of accumulated amortization

   $ 146,227      $ 162,636   

Additions

     —          5,980   

Disposals

     (3,789     —     

Amortization expense

     (9,767     (21,646

Currency translation and other

     (1,205     (743
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period, net of accumulated amortization

   $ 131,466      $ 146,227   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2012, the disposals represent intangible assets associated with the Company’s divested businesses. See discussion in Note 3 on discontinued operations for further details. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the additions relate to the December 2010 acquisition of Money Controls and the July 2011 acquisition of WTA.

As of June 30, 2012, the Company had $131.5 million of net intangible assets, of which $29.8 million were intangibles with indefinite useful lives, consisting of trade names. The Company amortizes the cost of other intangibles over their estimated useful lives unless such lives are deemed indefinite. Intangibles with indefinite useful lives are tested annually for impairment, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate the potential for impairment. If the carrying amount of the intangibles with indefinite useful lives exceeds the fair value, the intangible asset is written down to its fair value. Fair value is calculated using discounted cash flows.

 

A summary of intangible assets follows:

 

     Weighted Average                                          
     Amortization                                          
(in thousands)    Period of Finite    June 30, 2012      December 31, 2011  
     Lived Assets
(in years)
   Gross
Asset
     Accumulated
Amortization
     Net      Gross
Asset
     Accumulated
Amortization
     Net  

Intellectual property rights

   17.9    $ 87,630       $ 45,739       $ 41,891       $ 89,619       $ 46,286       $ 43,333   

Customer relationships and backlog

   11.9      138,501         68,754         69,747         146,291         66,256         80,035   

Drawings

   9.5      11,149         9,910         1,239         11,824         10,423         1,401   

Other

   14.3      49,684         31,095         18,589         52,155         30,697         21,458   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   14.2    $ 286,964       $ 155,498       $ 131,466       $ 299,889       $ 153,662       $ 146,227   
     

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Amortization expense for these intangible assets is currently estimated to be approximately $9.0 million in total for the remaining two quarters in 2012, $16.7 million in 2013, $14.9 million in 2014, $12.8 million in 2015, $11.9 million in 2016 and $36.4 million in 2017 and thereafter.