10-K

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-K

x	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002
	OR
o	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
	For the transition period from ___________to___________
	Commission file number 1-1657

CRANE CO.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware	13-1952290
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)	(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
100 First Stamford Place, Stamford, CT	06902
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (203) 363-7300
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class	Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, par value $1.00 Preferred Share Purchase Rights	New York Stock Exchange New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
8½% senior notes due March 2004
6¾% senior notes due October 2006
(Title of Class)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes   x No   o

Indicate by check mark if the disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).

Yes   x No   o

Based on the average stock price of $25.19 on June 28, 2002, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant was $1,188,687,157.

The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $1.00 par value was 59,400,296 at January 31, 2003.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the annual report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002 and portions of the proxy statement for the annual shareholders meeting to be held on April 28, 2003 are incorporated by reference into Parts I, II, III and IV of this Form10-K Annual Report.

PART I

Item 1. Business

        Crane Co. (“Crane” or the “Company”) is a diversified manufacturer of engineered industrial products.  Founded in 1855, Crane employs over 9,500 people in North America, Europe, Asia and Australia.

STRATEGY

        The Company’s strategy is to grow the earnings of niche businesses with high market share, acquire companies that offer strategic fits with existing businesses, aggressively pursue operational and strategic linkages among our businesses, build an aggressive and committed management team whose interests are directly aligned with those of the shareholders and maintain a focused, efficient corporate structure.

ACQUISITIONS

        In the past five years, the Company has completed 20 acquisitions.

    During 2002, the Company completed seven acquisitions at a total cost of $82.2 million.  In January 2002, the Company acquired the patents and other intellectual property of Trinity Airweighs, obtaining a system to measure aircraft weight and center of gravity.  Also in January 2002, the Company acquired Kavey Water Products which enhanced Crane Environmental’s capability to provide water treatment systems.  In May 2002, the Company acquired the Lasco Composites business from Tomkins Industries, Inc.  Lasco Composites is a manufacturer of fiberglass reinforced plastic (FRP) panels that further expands the Company’s Kemlite business in the transportation, building products and recreational vehicle markets and will provide an entry into the industrial market.   In July 2002, Crane acquired Corva Corporation, a privately held distributor of valves and actuators.   In November 2002, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of General Technology Corporation from an employee stock ownership plan trust for a purchase price of $25 million in cash and assumed debt.  General Technology provides high-reliability, customized-contract manufacturing services and products focused on military and defense applications.    General Technology will be integrated with the Electronic Group in the Company’s Aerospace Segment.  Also in November 2002, the Company acquired Qualis Incorporated, a privately held provider of polyester film embossing services, which has been integrated into Kemlite.   In November 2002, the Company entered into a joint venture in China furthering its low-cost pump manufacturing capabilities.  Preliminary estimates of goodwill for the 2002 acquisitions amounted to $55.6 million.

During 2001, the Company completed acquisitions at a total cost of $191 million. Goodwill for these acquisitions amounted to $67.9 million.  In February 2001, the Company acquired Ventech Controls, Inc., a valve repair business providing both shop repair and remanufacture of control valves and instruments.  Also in February 2001, the Company acquired the fiberglass reinforced panel business of UK-based Laminated Profiles Ltd. as part of its strategic initiative to penetrate the European transportation and recreational vehicle markets.  In April 2001, the Company acquired the Industrial Flow Group of Alfa Laval Holding AB (renamed Crane Process Flow Technologies) which includes the Saunders brand of diaphragm valves manufactured in the UK and India and the DEPA brand of air operated diaphragm pumps manufactured in Germany. Crane Process Flow Technologies focuses on the development, production and distribution of valves, pumps and related components in high value-added applications.  In June 2001, the Company acquired the Xomox valve business from Emerson Electric for $145 million.  Xomox supplies high-end, application-driven, sleeved-plug valves, lined valves, high performance butterfly valves and actuators to the chemical, pharmaceutical and other process industries.  During the third quarter of 2001, the Company acquired the aerospace hose product line of Teleflex Fluid Systems and Resistoflex GmbH.  AeroHose, based in Lantana, Florida, is a leading supplier of Teflon®-braided, high- pressure hose assemblies utilized in both commercial and military aircraft as well as ground support systems.  Resistoflex GmbH, based in Germany, is a leading manufacturer of Teflon®-lined, steel-piping products serving chemical and pharmaceutical markets in Europe.

2

PART I

Item 1. Business  (continued)

        During 2000, the Company completed two acquisitions at a total cost of $11.9 million.  Goodwill for these two acquisitions amounted to $8.5 million.  In March 2000, the Company acquired Streamware Corporation, a privately-held provider of business management software and market analysis tools for the vending and food service industry.   In December 2000, the Company acquired the assets of the Valve Repair Division of Groth Corporation.  With service centers located in Houston, Texas, the Valve Repair Division provides both shop and field testing and repair services for a broad range of valve types and is an authorized repair facility for many leading valve manufacturers. 

        In October 1999, the Company acquired Stentorfield, Ltd. a premier designer and manufacturer of hot and cold beverage vending machines, serving the U.K. and European market with a broad line of full-size and tabletop products for the hotel, restaurant, office coffee service and vending industries at a total cost of $33 million.    This business was integrated with the Company’s Crane Merchandising Systems business which is the leading North American designer and manufacturer of full-line vending machines, for snack, food and beverage.  Goodwill for this acquisition amounted to $24.3 million. 

        During 1998, the Company completed four acquisitions at a total cost of $178 million.  Goodwill for these four acquisitions amounted to $130 million.   In May 1998, the Company acquired Environmental Products USA, Inc.  This business manufactures membrane-based water treatment systems for industrial, commercial and institutional markets.  In August 1998, the Company acquired Sequentia Holdings, Inc., a manufacturer of fiberglass-reinforced plastic panels for the construction and building products markets.  Sequentia complements the Company’s Kemlite subsidiary which provides fiberglass-reinforced plastic panels for the transportation and recreational vehicle markets.  In September 1998, the Company acquired Liberty Technologies, Inc., a manufacturer of  valve, motor, engine and compressor condition monitoring products and related services which has been combined with the Company’s nuclear valve business which provides valves, valve diagnostic equipment and related services to the nuclear power industry and its Dynalco Controls business which provides sensors, instrumentation, control products and automation systems for use in industrial engine applications.  Also in September 1998, the Company acquired the Plastic-Lined Piping Products (“PLPP”) Division of The Dow Chemical Company.  PLPP was integrated with the Company’s Resistoflex Division, which supplies lined pipe and valves to the chemical process and industrial markets. 

DIVESTITURES

        In the past five years, the Company has divested nine businesses.  In September 2002, the Company sold its CorTec unit for approximately $3 million.  In September 2001, the Company sold Powers Process Controls for its carrying value.  In October 2001, the Company sold the Crane Plumbing business in Canada recording an after-tax loss of approximately $8.5 million.  Proceeds from the sale of these businesses in 2001 were approximately $20 million.  During the third quarter of 2001, Crane and Emerson Electric Co. announced the formation of a joint venture involving Emerson’s Commercial Cam unit and Crane’s Ferguson business unit.  Crane and Emerson  contributed their respective operations into a new company, Industrial Motion Control Holdings, LLC. Crane also contributed $12 million of cash into the venture.  The Ferguson/Camco joint venture is being accounted for on the equity basis and the investment amounted to $21 million at year-end 2002 and is included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet.

3

PART I

Item 1. Business  (continued)

        In May 2000, the Company sold its interest in Powec AS, a Norwegian manufacturer of power supplies for the telecommunications industry.  In addition, the Company’s wholly-owned ELDEC Corporation subsidiary sold its related telecommunications power supply product line to the same purchaser.  Total consideration for both transactions was $45.6 million.  In April 1999, the Company sold Southwest Foundry, acquired as part of the Stockham Valves and Fittings, Inc. transaction, for $400,000.  In December 1999, the Company sold its Crane Defense Systems business for $7.1 million.  In 1998, the Company sold two foundry operations acquired as part of the Stockham Valves and Fittings Inc. transaction.  Accu-Cast, Inc. and the Aliceville Foundry were sold for a total of $4.3 million.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

        On December 16, 1999, the Company distributed all of the shares of its Huttig Building Products (“Huttig”) subsidiary to shareholders of the Company on the basis of one share of Huttig for every 4.5 shares of Crane Co. common stock.  Prior to this spin-off distribution, Huttig repaid an intercompany loan of $68 million to the Company which the Company used to pay down debt.  The Wholesale Segment was discontinued when Huttig was spun off.

LONG-TERM FINANCING

        In September 1998, the Company sold $100,000,000 of 6.75% notes that will mature on October 1, 2006.  During April 1992, the Company sold $100,000,000 of 8.5% notes that will mature on March 15, 2004.

        In February 2002, the Company entered into a two-year interest-rate swap agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank which converted $100 million of 8.5% fixed rate debt to LIBOR plus 4.985%.   In October 2002, the Company closed this position.  The gain of $2.2 million, included in the carrying value of debt, is being amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining life of the Company’s outstanding 8.5% Notes due March 15, 2004.

BUSINESS SEGMENTS

        See page 38 of the Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, for sales, operating profit and assets employed by each business segment.   At the end of 2002, the Company changed its organizational structure relating to Resistoflex, the most significant component of which is now managed in the Fluid Handling Segment.  The remaining component is included in the Aerospace Segment.

4

PART I

Item 1. Business  (continued)

AEROSPACE

        The Aerospace Segment consists of ELDEC, Hydro-Aire/Lear Romec, Interpoint, General Technology Corporation (“GTC”) and Resistoflex-Aerospace.

     ELDEC designs, manufactures and markets custom position indication and control systems, proximity sensors, pressure sensors, true mass fuel flowmeters and power conversion systems for the commercial transport, business, regional, general aviation, military, repair and overhaul and electronics markets.  These products are custom designed for specific aircraft to meet technically demanding requirements of the aerospace industry.  ELDEC has facilities in Redmond, Washington, England and France.

     Hydro-Aire designs, manufactures and sells aircraft brake control and anti-skid systems, including electro-hydraulic servo valves and manifolds, embedded software and rugged electronic controls, hydraulic control valves, landing gear sensors and fuel pumps as original equipment to the commercial transport, business, regional, general aviation, military and government aerospace, repair and overhaul markets.  In addition, Hydro-Aire designs and manufactures systems similar to those above for the retrofit of aircraft with improved systems and manufactures replacement parts for systems installed as original equipment by aircraft manufacturers.  All of these products are largely proprietary to Hydro-Aire and, to some extent, are custom designed to the requirements and specifications of the aircraft manufacturer or program contractor.  These systems and replacement parts are sold directly to aircraft manufacturers, airlines, governments, and aircraft maintenance and overhaul companies.

        Lear Romec designs, manufactures and sells lubrication and fuel pumps for aircraft and radar cooling systems for the commercial and military aerospace industries.  Lear Romec has a leading share of the non-captive market for turbine engine lube and scavenge oil pumps.  Lear Romec also manufactures fuel boost and transfer pumps for commuter and business aircraft.

        Interpoint designs, manufactures and sells standard and custom miniature (hybrid) DC-to-DC power converters and custom miniature (hybrid) electronic circuits for applications in commercial, space and military aerospace, fiber optic and medical technology industries.  Interpoint has facilities in Redmond, Washington and Taiwan.

        GTC provides high-reliability, customized-contract manufacturing services and products focused on military and defense applications.  GTC services include the assembly and testing of printed circuit boards, electromechanical devices, customized integrated systems, cables and wire harnesses.

        Resistoflex-Aerospace manufactures high-performance, separable fittings for operating pressures to 8,000 PSI used primarily in the aerospace industry.  Its products are sold directly to the aerospace industry.

        The segment employs 2,100 people and had assets of $261.6 million at year-end.  The order backlog totaled $217.6 million and $254.6 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

5

PART I

Item 1. Business  (continued)

ENGINEERED MATERIALS

        The Engineered Materials Segment consists of Kemlite and Polyflon.

        Kemlite manufactures FRP panels for the transportation industry, in refrigerated and dry-van truck trailers, recreational vehicles, industrial markets and the commercial construction industry for food processing, fast-food restaurant and supermarket applications, as well as institutions where fire-rated materials with low-smoke generation and minimum toxicity are required, and for residential construction.  Kemlite sells its products directly to truck trailer and recreational vehicle manufacturers and uses distributors to serve the commercial construction market and some segments of the recreational vehicle market.  Kemlite’s manufacturing facilities are located in Illinois, Arkansas, Tennessee, Texas and Kentucky.   In May 2002, the Company acquired Lasco Composites, expanding Kemlite’s product offerings in the transportation, building products and recreational vehicle markets and provided an entry into the industrial market.

        Polyflon manufactures microwave laminates, high-voltage RF capacitors, radomes and circuit processing for wireless communication, magnetic resonance imaging, microwave and radar system manufacturers.

        The segment employs 850 people and had assets of $191.0 million at year-end.  The order backlog totaled $11.2 million and $8.0 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

MERCHANDISING SYSTEMS

        The Merchandising Systems Segment has two operating units: Crane Merchandising Systems (“CMS”) and National Rejectors, Inc. GmbH (“NRI”).

        CMS products include electronic vending merchandisers for refrigerated and frozen foods, hot and cold beverages, snack foods, single cup individually brewed hot drinks and combination vendors/merchandisers designed to vend both snack foods and hot/cold drinks or snacks and refrigerated/frozen foods in one machine.  CMS has manufacturing facilities in Bridgeton, Missouri and England.  CMS products are marketed to customers in the United States and Europe by Company sales and marketing personnel as well as distributors and, in other international markets, through independent distributors.  CMS launched new features, new products and updated technology in 2002, including its new guaranteed delivery system called SureVend.  CMS also includes Streamware Corporation, a leading provider of business management software and market analysis tools for the vending and food service industry.  Streamware’s VendMAX is a fully-integrated software/hardware solution that offers operators cash accountability, inventory control and improved merchandising capabilities.

        NRI manufactures electronic coin validators in Buxtehude, Germany for the automated merchandising and gambling/amusement markets in Europe. NRI is among the relatively few makers of coin validators that supply European countries with validators programmed for the new euro coins that went into circulation at the start of 2002.

        The segment employs 1,100 people and had assets of $114.6 million at year-end.  Order backlog totaled $12.9 million and $31.1 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

6

PART I

Item 1. Business  (continued)

FLUID HANDLING

        The Fluid Handling Segment consists of the Crane Valves, Crane Valves-U.K., Valve Services, Crane Pumps & Systems, Crane Environmental, Crane Supply businesses and Resistoflex-Industrial Products.  The Crane Valves businesses, with eight manufacturing facilities in North America as well as operations in the United Kingdom, Germany, Australia, Norway, India, Hungary, China, Indonesia, and Mexico sell a wide variety of commodity and special purpose valves and fluid control products for the chemical and hydrocarbon processing, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, power generation, marine, general industrial and commercial construction industries.  Products are sold under the trade names Crane, Saunders, Jenkins, Pacific, Xomox, DEPA, ELRO, REVO, Westad, Flowseal, Centerline, Stockham, Triangle and Duocheck. The Company’s Valve Service business, with three manufacturing facilities in North America, provides valves, valve diagnostic equipment and related services to the nuclear power, chemical and hydrocarbon processing and power generation industries.

        Crane Pumps & Systems has seven manufacturing facilities in the United States.  Pumps are manufactured under the trade names Deming, Weinman, Chempump, Burks, Chem/Meter, Barnes, Sellers and Process Systems.  Pumps are sold to a broad customer base which includes chemical and hydrocarbon processing, automotive, municipal, industrial and commercial wastewater, power generation, commercial heating, ventilation and air-conditioning industries and original equipment manufacturers.  Crane Environmental has a manufacturing facility in Florida and serves the water and wastewater treatment market.  Its products are sold under the trade names Cochrane and Environmental Products.

        Crane Supply, a distributor of plumbing supplies, valves and piping in Canada, maintains thirty-seven branches throughout Canada.

        Resistoflex-Industrial Products (“Resistoflex”) is engaged in the design, manufacture and sale of corrosion-resistant, plastic-lined steel pipes, fittings, tanks, valves, expansion joints and hose used primarily by the pharmaceutical, chemical processing, pulp and paper, ultra pure water and waste management industries.  Resistoflex sells its industrial products through distributors who provide stocking and fabrication services to industrial users in the United States.  Resistoflex also manufactures plastic-lined pipe products at its Singapore plant serving the Asian chemical processing and pharmaceutical industries.

        Products in this segment are sold directly to end users through Crane’s sales organization and through independent distributors and manufacturers representatives.

        The segment employs 5,000 people and had assets of $599.5 million at year-end.  Order backlog totaled $130.2 million and $150.7 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

7

PART I

Item 1. Business  (continued)

CONTROLS

        The Controls Segment consists of Barksdale and Azonix/Dynalco.  The companies in this segment design, manufacture and market industrial and commercial products that control flows and processes in various industries including transportation, petroleum, chemical, construction, food and beverage and power generation.

        Barksdale manufactures solid state and electromechanical pressure switches and transducers, level switches and continuous level indicators, temperature switches and directional control valves that serve a broad range of commercial and industrial applications.  It has manufacturing and marketing facilities in Los Angeles, California and Reichelsheim, Germany.

        Azonix/Dynalco designs and manufactures rotational speed sensors, temperature and pressure instruments and monitors for rugged environments, microprocessor-based engine and mechanism controls. Azonix/Dynalco’s products are used worldwide in a variety of applications for various industries including transportation, power generation, oil, gas, petrochemical, chemical, pharmaceutical, agriculture and metal processing. It also manufactures operator interfaces and measurement and control systems for hazardous and harsh applications, intelligent data acquisition products, high-precision thermometers and calibrators.   Azonix/Dynalco has manufacturing and service facilities in Massachusetts, Florida and Texas.

        The products in this segment are sold directly to end users and engineering contractors through the Company’s own sales force and cooperatively with sales representatives, stocking specialists and industrial distributors.

        The segment employs 400 people and had assets of $52.5 million at year-end.  Order backlog totaled $13.8 million and $18.4 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

COMPETITIVE CONDITIONS

        The Company’s lines of business are conducted under actively competitive conditions in each of the geographic and product areas they serve.  Because of the diversity of the classes of products manufactured and sold, they do not compete with the same companies in all geographic or product areas.  Accordingly, it is not possible to estimate the precise number of competitors or to identify the principal methods of competition.

        The Company’s products have primary application in the aerospace, electronics, hydrocarbon processing, petrochemical, chemical, power generation, automated merchandising, recreational vehicle and transportation industries.  As such, they are dependent upon numerous unpredictable factors, including changes in market demand, general economic conditions and capital spending.  Because these products are also sold in a wide variety of markets and applications, the Company does not believe it can reliably quantify or predict the possible effects upon its business resulting from such changes.

        Seasonality is a factor in the Canadian operations.  Net sales in Canada and assets related to Canadian operations were 10.8% and 4.4% in 2002 and 11.6% and 4.7% in 2001, of the Company’s respective consolidated amounts.

8

PART I

Item 1. Business  (continued)

        The Company’s engineering and product development activities are directed primarily toward improvement of existing products and adaptation of existing products to particular customer requirements.  While the Company owns numerous patents and licenses, none are of such importance that termination would materially affect its business. Research and development costs are expensed when incurred. These costs were approximately $46.0 million in 2002, $50.9 million in 2001, and $48.3 million in 2000, incurred mostly by the Aerospace segment.  Funds received from customer-sponsored research and development projects were approximately $5.1 million, $4.7 million and $6.7 million received in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and were recorded in net sales.  Aerospace engineering costs were controlled in 2002 reflecting the downturn in the aerospace market.

        The Company is not dependent on any single customer nor are there any issues at this time regarding available raw materials for inventory.

        Costs of compliance with federal, state and local laws and regulations involving the discharge of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment are not expected to have a material effect upon the Company’s capital expenditures, earnings or competitive position.

PRE-APPROVAL OF FEES TO INDEPENDENT AUDITOR

        At its January 27, 2003 meeting, the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors pre-approved a budget of specific fees to be paid to the Company’s independent auditors, Deloitte & Touche, during 2003. The total amount pre-approved was $3.2 million, with $1.7 million representing audit and audit-related fees, $1.3 million representing fees for tax services, and the balance representing other services.

AVAILABLE INFORMATION

Copies of Crane’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and any amendments to those reports, are available free of charge on Crane’s website at www.craneco.com as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

        Throughout the Annual Report to Shareholders, particularly in the President’s Letter to Shareholders and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Operations, the Company makes numerous statements about expectations of future performance and market trends and statements about plans and objectives and other matters which because they are not historical fact, may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.

        In addition, the Company and its representatives may, from time to time, make written or oral forward-looking statements including statements contained in the Company’s filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in its reports to shareholders which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “believes”, “contemplates”, “expects”, “may”, “will”, “could”, “should”, “would” or “anticipates” or the negative thereof or comparable terminology.

        All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date on which such statements are made and involve risk and uncertainties that exist in the Company’s operations and business environment and are not guarantees of future performance.  The Company assumes no obligation to update any of these forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information or future events.  As a responsibility to our investors, the Company will make reasonable efforts at timely disclosure of future facts and circumstances which may affect such statements.

        Because the Company wishes to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provision of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, readers are cautioned to consider the following important risk factors that could affect the Company’s businesses and cause actual results to differ materially from those projected.

General

        A substantial portion of the sales of the Company’s business segments are concentrated in industries which are cyclical in nature.  Because of the cyclical nature of these businesses, their results are subject to fluctuations in domestic and international economies as well as to currency fluctuations and unforeseen

9

PART I

Forward Looking Statements  (continued)

inflationary pressures.  Reductions in the business levels of these industries would negatively impact the sales and profitability of the affected business segments.

        While the Company is a principal competitor in most of its markets, all of its markets are highly competitive.  The Company’s competitors in many of its business segments can be expected in the future to improve technologies, reduce costs and develop and introduce new products, and the ability of the Company’s business segments to achieve similar advances will be important to their competitive positions.  Competitive pressures, including those discussed above, could cause one or more of the Company’s business segments to lose market share or could result in significant price erosion, either of which could have an adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations.

        The Company’s acquisition program entails the potential risks inherent in assessing the value, strengths, weaknesses, contingent or other liabilities and potential profitability of acquisition candidates and in integrating the operations of acquired companies.  There can be no assurance that suitable acquisition opportunities will be available in the future, that the Company will continue to acquire businesses or that any business acquired will be integrated successfully or prove profitable.

        Net sales and assets related to operations outside the United States were 42.7% and 30.6%, respectively, in 2002 and 41.3% and 29.9%, respectively, in 2001, of the Company’s respective consolidated amounts.  Such operations and transactions entail the risks associated with conducting business internationally, including the risk of currency fluctuations, slower payment of invoices, adverse trade regulations and possible social, economic and political instability.  While the full impact of this economic instability cannot be predicted, it could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s revenue and profitability.

        Certain of the Company’s business segments are dependent upon highly qualified personnel, and the Company generally is dependent upon the continued efforts of key management employees.

        New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for management to predict all of such factors.  Further, management cannot assess the impact of each such factor on the business or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause actual results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements.

Aerospace

        An additional significant fall off in demand for air travel or a decline in airline profitability generally could result in reduced aircraft orders and could also cause the airlines to scale back on more of their purchases of repair parts from Crane companies.  The companies could also be impacted if major aircraft manufacturers, such as Boeing (which represented approximately 15% and 20% of the segment’s revenue in 2002 and 2001, respectively) encountered production problems, or if pricing pressure from aircraft customers caused the manufacturers to press their suppliers to lower prices.  Sales and profits could face erosion if pricing pressure from competitors increased, if planned new products were delayed, if finding new aerospace-qualified suppliers grew more difficult, or if required technical personnel became harder to hire and retain.  Aerospace Segment results could be below expectations if further slowing of the U. S. economy causes customers to delay or cancel spare parts or aircraft orders.

10

PART I

Forward Looking Statements  (continued)

        During the third quarter of 2002, the Company’s Hydro-Aire unit identified a wire chafing situation on a few of its fuel pumps used on certain Boeing aircraft, and the Company recorded a $4 million charge to reimburse the airlines for the precautionary inspection of approximately 35,000 pumps on approximately  3,000 aircraft.  These inspections are proceeding as planned.  Subsequently, several additional pumps in this same set of 35,000 pumps have also been returned with a mechanical overheating issue.  The Company is working closely with Boeing and the Federal Aviation Administration (“FAA”) to understand the root cause of the latter issue.  In both instances, the FAA issued an Emergency Airworthiness Directive (“AD”) to instruct airline carriers to comply with a near term precautionary step of carrying additional jet fuel to keep fuel pumps submerged at all times, until the pumps are inspected, to mitigate ignition risk and to ensure air safety.  Several airline carriers have petitioned Hydro-Aire for reimbursement for additional costs, such as the cost of carrying additional jet fuel.  The Company has disclaimed responsibility for these costs under applicable contract terms, but the Company is continuing its efforts to resolve these issues in good faith on a mutually acceptable basis.

Engineered Materials

        In the Engineered Materials Segment, sales and profits could fall if there were a decline in demand for truck trailers, recreational vehicles, industrial or building products for which Crane’s companies produce fiberglass-reinforced panels.  Profits could be adversely affected as well by unanticipated increases in resin and fiberglass material costs and by any inability on the part of Crane’s companies to maintain their position in product cost and functionality against competing materials.

Merchandising Systems

        Results at Crane’s U.S.-based vending machine business could be reduced by delays in launching or supplying new products or an inability to achieve new product sales objectives.  Results at Crane’s German-based coin validation machine business have been and will continue to be affected by additional changes in demand stemming from the advent of the euro, the new European currency, as well as by unforeseen fluctuations in the value of the euro or other European currencies versus the U.S. dollar.

Fluid Handling

        Crane’s companies could face increased price competition from larger competitors.  Further slowing of the U. S. economy could reduce sales and profits, particularly if projects for which Crane’s companies are suppliers or bidders are cancelled or delayed, or if the Company’s ability to source product from international sources is impeded. At Crane’s foreign operations, reported results in U.S. dollar terms could be eroded by an unanticipated weakening of currency of the respective operations.

Controls

        A number of factors could affect the Controls Segment’s results.  Lower sales and earnings could result if Crane’s companies can not maintain their cost competitiveness, encounter delays in introducing new products or fail to achieve their new product sales objectives.  Results could decline because of an unanticipated decline in demand for Crane products from the industrial machinery, oil and gas or heavy equipment industries, or from unforeseen product obsolescence.

Asbestos Litigation

        The Company’s results of operations, cash flows and financial position could be adversely affected by further increases in asbestos claims or the cost of defending and settling such claims.  These factors are subject to substantial uncertainties relating to the demographic characteristics of claimants as well as legal standards

11

PART I

Forward Looking Statements  (continued)

and court decisions in numerous state and local jurisdictions.  In addition, financial or other difficulties affecting the Company’s insurers could reduce the costs borne by such insurers and thereby increase the costs borne by the Company. 

Item 2. Properties

TOTAL MANUFACTURING FACILITIES		NUMBER	AREA
Aerospace
	United States	7	717,000 sq. ft.
	International	3	37,000 sq. ft.
Engineered Materials
	United States	7	539,000 sq. ft.
	International	1	32,000 sq. ft.
Merchandising Systems
	United States	1	463,000  sq. ft.
	Other International	2	131,000  sq. ft.
Fluid Handling
	United States	17	1,748,000  sq. ft.
	International	21	2,124,000  sq. ft.
Controls
	United States	4	181,000  sq. ft.
	International	1	27,000  sq. ft.

Leased Manufacturing Facilities	Leases Expiring Through		Number		Area
United States		2006		11		402,000 sq. ft.
Other International		2008		10		412,000 sq. ft.

Other Facilities

Fluid Handling operates five valve service centers in the United States, of which two are owned, and seven distribution centers in the United States.  This segment operates 48 distribution and 14 service centers outside the United States.

Merchandising Systems operates six distribution centers in the United States and seven internationally.

Engineered Materials operates seven distribution centers in the United States, of which one is owned, and three outside the United States.

In the opinion of management, these properties have been well maintained, are in sound operating condition and contain all necessary equipment and facilities for their intended purposes.

12

PART I

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

As of December 31, 2002, the Company was a defendant, among a number of defendants, typically over 50 and frequently in the hundreds, in cases filed in various state and federal courts alleging injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos.  Activity related to asbestos claims was as follows:

	2002			2001			2000
Beginning claims		16,180			5,460			2,434
New claims		49,429			10,985			3,123
Settlements		(11,299	)		(66	)		(28	)
Dismissals		(272	)		(199	)		(69	)
Ending claims		54,038			16,180			5,460

Of the 54,038 pending claims as of December 31, 2002, approximately 20,000 were filed in New York by one firm and approximately 25,000 were filed by several firms in Mississippi. These filings typically do not identify any of the Company’s products as a source of asbestos exposure, and based on the Company’s past experience, it is expected that a substantial majority of such New York claims will be dismissed against the Company for lack of product identification.

The gross settlement costs (before insurance recoveries and tax effects) for the Company totaled $7.3 million in 2002, including settlement of 9,040 claims brought by one group of plaintiff attorneys in Mississippi payable within the next year, $760,000 in 2001 and $480,000 in 2000. Total gross legal costs (before insurance recoveries and tax effects) incurred in connection with the claims were $4.8 million in 2002, $2.3 million in 2001 and $1.3 million in 2000. Costs per claim vary depending on a number of factors, including the nature of the alleged exposure, the injury alleged and the jurisdiction where the claim was filed. Total pre-tax cash payments by the Company for settlement and defense costs were $1.4 million in 2002, $820,000 in 2001 and $270,000 in 2000 reflecting the impact of payment terms and insurance recoveries to date.

It is the Company’s accounting practice to conduct a detailed analysis of its asbestos-related liabilities quarterly or sooner if circumstances change significantly.  The liability recorded for asbestos claims constitutes management’s best estimate, based on the Company’s past experience of claims filed and defense and settlement costs for pending and reasonably anticipated future claims through 2007.  For claims that will be filed beyond 2007, management believes that the level of uncertainty is too great to provide for reasonable estimation of the number of future claims, the nature of such claims, or the cost to resolve them and, accordingly, no accrual has been recorded for any costs which may be incurred beyond 2007.  A long-term liability is recorded to cover the estimated cost of asbestos claims through 2007 and an asset is recorded representing the probable insurance reimbursement (approximately 40 percent of defense and settlement costs).

During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company updated its evaluation of potential defense and settlement costs and the insurance coverage estimated to be available to cover these costs. The Company reviewed, among other things, the incidence of past and recent claims, historical and recent settlement results, the number of cases pending against it, litigation costs and asbestos litigation developments that may impact the exposure of the Company. The Company recently experienced a significant increase in the number of claims and defense and settlement costs involving asbestos-related claims. As a result, based on this historical experience, management’s estimate of the future number of claims and claim costs has changed resulting in

13

PART I

Item 3. Legal Proceedings (continued)

a $108 million asbestos-related claims provision after insurance recoveries ($73 million net of tax) during the fourth quarter of 2002 bringing the total provision for 2002 to $115 million ($78 million net of tax). The Company’s December 31, 2002 estimated liability for asbestos-related claims before consideration of insurance recoveries was determined to be $200 million, or $120 million after insurance recoveries. As the net amount accrued at September 30, 2002 was $12 million, the additional charge of $108 million was required in the fourth quarterof 2002. Estimation of the Company’s ultimate exposure for asbestos-related claims is subject to significant uncertainties, as there are multiple variables that can affect the timing, severity and quantity of claims.  The Company cautions that its liability is based on assumptions with respect to future new claims, defense and settlement costs based on historical experience rates during the last few years that may not prove reliable as predictors.

The Company receives reimbursement of settlement and defense costs from its primary insurers up to the agreed available limits of the applicable policies. The Company has substantial excess coverage policies that are expected to respond to asbestos claims as settlements and other payments exhaust the primary policies, but there is no cost sharing or allocation agreement yet in place with the excess insurers.  The same factors that affect developing estimates of probable defense and settlement costs for asbestos-related liabilities also affect estimates of the probable insurance reimbursement, as do a number of additional factors. These additional factors include the financial viability of the insurance companies, the method in which losses will be allocated to the various insurance policies and the years covered by those policies, how legal and defense costs will be covered by the insurance policies and interpretation of the effect on coverage of various policy terms and limits and their interrelationships.

The Company determined it is probable that approximately 40%, or $80 million, of the estimated $200 million gross liability at December 31, 2002 will be paid by the Company’s insurers.  This determination was made after considering the terms of the available insurance coverage, the financial viability of the insurance companies, the status of negotiations with its insurers and consulting with legal counsel.  This insurance receivable has been recorded in other long-term assets as of December 31, 2002.

Since many uncertainties exist surrounding asbestos litigation, the Company will continue to evaluate its asbestos-related estimated liability and corresponding estimated insurance reimbursement as well as the underlying assumptions used to derive these amounts. These uncertainties may result in the Company incurring future charges to operations to adjust the carrying value of recorded liabilities and assets, particularly if escalation in the number of claims and defense and settlement costs occurs; however, the Company is currently unable to estimate such future changes.  Although the resolution of these claims is anticipated to take many years, amounts recorded for the liability under generally accepted accounting principles are not discounted, and the effect on results of operations, cash flow and financial position in any given period from a revision to these estimates could be material.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

        No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 2002.

14

PART I

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT

Name	Position	Business Experience During Past Five Years	Age	Officer Since
Eric C. Fast (1)	President and Chief Executive Officer	President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since April 2001.  President and Chief Operating Officer from September 1999 to April 2001. Previously, Co-Head of Global Investment Banking of Salomon Smith Barney (investment banking firm) from 1997 to 1998, CO-Head of Global Investment Banking of Salomon Brothers, Inc. (investment banking firm) from 1995 to 1997 and a Managing Director of that firm since 1988.	53	1999
Gil A. Dickoff	Treasurer	Treasurer of the Company since 1992.	41	1992
Augustus I. duPont	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary	Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of the Company since 1996.	51	1996
Bradley L. Ellis	Vice President-Chief Information Officer	Vice President - Chief Information Officer of the Company since July 1997.	34	1997
Joan Atkinson Nano	Vice President & Controller	Vice President & Controller of the Company since November 2001. Previously, Director of New Controllership Initiatives at GE Capital Corporation (financial services) from 2000 to 2001 and Director, Worldwide Planning and Analysis of Pitney Bowes Corporation (business machines and services) from 1994 to 1999, and as Assistant Corporate Controller from 1988 to 1994.	47	2001
Elise M. Kopczick	Vice President- Human Resources	Vice President-Human Resources of the Company since January 2001. Previously, President of the Company’s Lear Romec division from August 1999 to January 2001 and Vice President-Human Resources at the Company’s Hydro-Aire subsidiary from January 1996 to August 1999.	49	2001
Thomas M. Noonan	Vice President-Taxes	Vice President – Taxes of the Company since November 2001. Vice President Controller and Chief Tax Officer of the Company from April 2000 to November 2001,  Vice President, Taxes of the Company from September 1999 to April 2000 and Director of Taxes of the Company from March 1996 to September 1999.	48	1999

15

PART I

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT (Continued)

Anthony D. Pantaleoni Vice President- Environment, Health & Safety Vice President - Environment, Health & Safety of the Company Health & Safety since 1989. 48 1989

PART II

Item 5.		Market for the Registrant’s Common Stock and Related Stockholder Matters.
	The information required by Item 5 is hereby incorporated by reference to Pages 47 and 49 of the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Item 6.		Selected Financial Data.
	The information required by Item 6 is hereby incorporated by reference to Page 46 of the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Item 7.		Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
	The information required by Item 7 is hereby incorporated by reference to Pages 13 through 23 and pages 41 through  45 of the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Item 7A.		Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks.
	The information required by Item 7A is hereby incorporated by reference to Page 23 of the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Item 8.		Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.
	The information required by Item 8 is hereby incorporated by reference to Pages 24 through 40 and page 46 of the 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders.

Item 9.	Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
	None

PART III

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant

        The information required by Item 10 is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement dated March 7, 2003, which the Company has filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation l4A except that such information with respect to Executive Officers of the Registrant is included, pursuant to Instruction 3, paragraph (b) of Item 401 of Regulation S-K, under Part I.

Item 11. Executive Compensation

        The information required by Item 11 is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement dated March 7, 2003, which the Company has filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation l4A.

16

PART III  (Continued)

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management

        The information required by Item 12 is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement dated March  7, 2003, which the Company has filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.

Equity Compensation Plan Information

	Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options		Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options		Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders		6,043,000	$	23.85		1,518,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders		—		—		—
Total		6,043,000	$	23.85		1,518,000

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

        The information required by Item 13 is incorporated by reference to the definitive proxy statement dated March 7, 2003, which the Company has filed with the Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.

Item 14. Controls and Procedures

        (a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.  The Company’s Chief Executive Officer (who currently serves as Acting Chief Financial Officer) has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this annual report.  The Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that are filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer has concluded that these controls are effective.

        (b) Change in Internal Controls.  There have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls subsequent to the date of the Company’s evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant material deficiencies or material weaknesses.

17

PART IV

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule, and Reports on Form 8-K

(a)(1)			The consolidated balance sheets of Crane Co. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001 and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in common shareholders’ equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 and the report thereon of Deloitte & Touche LLP dated January 21, 2003 appearing on Pages 24 through 40 of Crane Co.’s 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders which will be furnished with the definitive proxy statement as required by Regulation 14A, Rule 14a-3(c), are incorporated herein by reference.
(2)			Financial statement schedules for which provision is made in the applicable regulation of the Securities and Exchange Commission have been omitted because they are not required under related instructions, or are inapplicable or the information is shown in the financial statements and related notes.
(3)	Exhibits
				Exhibit 10(a)			Crane Co. Corporate EVA Incentive Compensation Plan
				Exhibit 11			Computation of net income per share.
				Exhibit 13			Annual Report to shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002.
				Exhibit 21			Subsidiaries of the Registrant.
				Exhibit 23			Independent auditors’ consent.
				Exhibit 99.1			Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of  2002.
(b)		Reports on Form 8-K:
		No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the quarter ended December 31, 2002.
(c)		Exhibits to Form 10-K:
				There is incorporated by reference herein:
				(3)	(a)	The Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, as amended on May 25, 1999 contained in Exhibit 3A to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
					(b)	The Company’s By-Laws, as amended on January 24, 2000 contained in Exhibit 3B to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1999.
				(4)	Instruments Defining the Rights of Security Holders, including Indentures:
					(a)	There is incorporated by reference herein:
						(1)		Preferred Share Purchase Rights Agreement contained in Exhibit 1 to the Company’s Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 6, 1998.
					(b)	There is incorporated by reference herein:
						1)		Indenture dated as of April 1,1991 between the Registrant and the Bank of New York contained in Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 16, 1998.
				(10)	Material Contracts:
					(iii)	Compensatory Plans

18

PART IV   (Continued)

Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedule, and Reports on Form 8-K

There is incorporated by reference herein:
	(a)	The forms of Employment/Severance Agreement between the Company and certain executive officers  (Form I) and (Form II) which provide for the continuation of certain employee benefits upon a change of control as contained in Exhibit C of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994.
	(b)	The indemnification agreements entered into with each director and executive officer of the Company, the form of which is contained in Exhibit C to the Company’s definitive proxy statement filed with the Commission in connection with the Company’s April 27, 1987 Annual Meeting.
	(c)	The Crane Co. Retirement Plan for Non-Employee Directors contained in Exhibit E to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1988.
	(d)	The Crane Co. 1998 Stock Option Plan contained in Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement No. 333-50489 on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on April 20, 1998.
	(e)	The Crane Co. 1998 Restricted Stock Award Plan contained in Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement No. 333-50487 on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on April 20, 1998.
	(f)	The Crane Co. 1998 Non-Employee Director Restricted Stock Award Plan contained in Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Registration Statement No. 333-50495 on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on April 20, 1998.
	(g)	The Crane Co. 2000 Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan contained in Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000.
	(h)	The employment agreement with Eric C. Fast contained in Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2000.
	(i)	The EVA Incentive Compensation Plan as amended January 22, 2001 contained in exhibit 10(i) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
	(j)	The employment agreement with Eric C. Fast contained in Exhibit 10(j) to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000.
	(k)	The Crane Co. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan contained in Exhibit 10(b) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.
	(l)	The employment agreement with Robert S. Evans contained in Exhibit 10(a) to the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 2001.
	(m)	The Crane Co. Corporate EVA Incentive Compensation Plan (filed herewith as Exhibit 10(a)).

        All other exhibits are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is shown elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

19

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section l3 or l5 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of l934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

	CRANE CO.
	(Registrant)
By	/s/ E.C. FAST
	E.C.Fast
	President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer
Date	3/7/2003

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of l934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

OFFICERS

	/s/ E.C. FAST		/s/ J. ATKINSON NANO
	E.C.Fast		J.Atkinson Nano
	President, Chief Executive Officer, Acting Chief Financial Officer and a Director (Principal Financial Officer)		Vice President, Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
Date	3/7/2003	Date	3/7/2003

DIRECTORS

	/s/ R.S. EVANS		/s/ E.T. BIGELOW, JR.		/s/ R.S. FORTE’
	R.S.Evans		E.T. Bigelow, Jr.		R.S. Forte’
Date	2/24/2003	Date	2/24/2003	Date	2/24/2003
	/s/ D.R. GARDNER		/s/ J. GAULIN
	D.R. Gardner		J. Gaulin		W.E.  Lipner
Date	2/24/2003	Date	2/24/2003
	/s/ D.C. MINTON		/s/ C.J. QUEENAN, JR.		/s/ J.L.L. TULLIS
	D.C. Minton		C.J. Queenan, Jr.		J.L.L. Tullis
Date	2/24/2003	Date	2/24/2003	Date	2/24/2003

20

CERTIFICATION

I, Eric C. Fast, President and Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of Crane Co., certify that:

            (1) I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Crane Co.;

            (2) Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report;

            (3) Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the Company as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report;

            (4) I am responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the Company and I have:

a)	designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to me by others within those entities, particularly during the period for which this annual report is being prepared;
b)	evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the “Evaluation Date”); and
c)	presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date;

            (5)  I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the Company’s auditors and the Audit Committee of Company’s Board of Directors:

a)	all significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the Company’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the Company’s auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and
b)	any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the Company’s internal controls; and

            (6)  I have indicated in this annual report whether or not there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses.

March 7, 2003

/s/ ERIC C. FAST

Eric C. Fast

President, Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer

21

EX-10.(A)

EXHIBIT 10(a)

CRANE CO. CORPORATE
EVA INCENTIVE COMPENSATION PLAN

As Amended & Restated Effective January 1, 2002

1.  Purpose.

            In 1988, Crane Co., a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), initially adopted an annual incentive compensation program based on the principles of Economic Value Added.  The purpose of this approach is to maximize shareholder value by aligning management’s interests with those of the Company’s shareholders and rewarding management for sustainable and continuous improvement in the business being managed.  The Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”) approved certain amendments to the Plan effective January 1, 2002 for the corporate office participants in order to more closely align the EVA calculations under the Plan with the financial results reported to shareholders and to achieve greater transparency to the participants in the financial calculations required under the Plan.  This is an amendment and restatement of the Plan effective January 1, 2002 for the corporate office participants.  For all periods prior to January 1, 2002, the provisions of the Plan as in effect prior to this restatement shall govern. 

2.  Definitions.

            For purposes of this Plan, the following capitalized terms shall have the respective meanings set forth below:

                    (a)  “Annual Payout” means an annual cash payment to a Participant determined in accordance with Section 7 and includes the payment of shares of restricted stock for Plan Year 2002 as set forth in Section 7(a).

                    (b)  “Average Capital Employed” means, for any Plan Year, the weighted average monthly operating capital for the year, but without deducting any reserves for asbestos-related claims, as determined by the Company following the close of the Plan Year.

                    (c)   “Bank Account” means a bookkeeping account established for each Participant.

                    (d)   “Board” shall have the meaning given to such term in Section 1.

                    (e)   “Bonus Pool” means each of the bonus pools established in accordance with Section 5.

                    (f)   “Company” shall have the meaning given to such term in Section 1.

                    (g)   “Committee” means the Management Organization and Compensation Committee of the Board.

                    (h)   “Cost of Capital” means, for any Plan Year, the weighted average cost of equity and the after-tax cost of debt.  The cost of equity and the after-tax cost of debt shall be fixed by the Committee prior to the beginning of the Plan Year and the weighted average monthly Cost of Capital shall be determined by the Committee following the close of the Plan Year.

                    (i)   “EVA” means, for any Plan Year, the Return on Capital less the Cost of Capital, multiplied by the Average Capital Employed.

                    (j)   “EVA Award” means each Participant’s individual award amount for a Plan Year as determined in accordance with Section 6.

                    (k)   “NOPAT” means net operating profit after tax for the Plan Year as set forth in the Company’s audited financial statements plus the after-tax amount of expenses for asbestos-related claims against the Company and its subsidiaries during such Plan Year.

                    (l)    “Participants” means the individuals designated by the Committee in accordance with Section 4 as eligible to participate in the Plan.

                    (m)    “Participation Percentage” means the Bonus Pool percentage established for each Participant in accordance with Section 6.  The aggregate Participation Percentages of all Participants for a Plan Year shall not exceed 100%.

                    (n)    “Plan Year” means each calendar year during the term of this Plan.

                    (o)    “Return on Capital” means, for any Plan Year, NOPAT divided by Average Capital Employed.

                    (p)    “Target Bonus” means a target bonus for each Participant, stated as a percentage of the Participant’s base annual salary for the Plan Year, established by the Committee in accordance with Section 4.

3.  Administration.

            The Plan will be administered by the Committee.  The Committee’s decisions in the administration of the Plan shall be final and binding on all parties.  The Committee shall have the sole discretionary authority to interpret the Plan, to establish and modify administrative rules for the Plan, to designate the employees eligible to participate in the Plan, to establish and adjust any EVA formula or calculation as provided in Sections 4, 5 and 6, to impose such conditions and restrictions on awards under the Plan as it determines appropriate, and to take such steps in connection with the Plan and awards made under the Plan as it may deem necessary or advisable.  Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may, in its discretion, delegate any or all of its powers and duties hereunder to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, provided that, with respect to the participation hereunder by the Chief Executive Officer and any other officers of the Company whose compensation is subject to the deduction limitation set forth in Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, all such powers and duties shall remain with the Committee to the extent necessary to ensure, to the extent practicable, that amounts payable under this Plan qualify as “performance-based compensation” under Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Internal Revenue Code and the regulations thereunder.

            The Committee may employ attorneys, consultants, accountants or other persons and the Committee and the Company and its officers and directors shall be entitled to rely upon the advice, opinions or valuations of any such persons.  All usual and reasonable expenses of the Committee shall be paid by the Company.  No Committee member shall receive compensation with respect to his or her services for the Committee except as may be authorized by the Board.  All actions taken and all interpretations and determinations made by the Committee in good faith shall be final and binding upon all employees who have received awards, the Company and all other interested persons.  No member of the Committee shall be personally liable for any action, determination or interpretation taken or made in good faith with respect to this Plan or awards made hereunder, and all members of the Committee shall be fully indemnified and protected by the Company in respect of any such action, determination or interpretation.

4. Eligibility.

            The persons who shall participate in this Plan shall be such officers and other key employees of the Company as may be designated as Participants by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer.  Not later

than the end of the first month of each Plan Year, the Committee shall fix a Participation Percentage and a Target Bonus for each Participant, provided that the Participation Percentage and Target Bonus for a Participant who becomes a Participant during the Plan Year shall be fixed at the time such participation commences.

5. Calculation of EVA and Determination of Bonus Pool.

            As soon as practicable following the close of each Plan Year, the Company shall determine, subject to review and approval by the Committee, the EVA for such Plan Year upon which the Bonus Pool calculation shall be based. 

            For each Plan Year, a Bonus Pool shall be established by applying a formula to the EVA for the Plan Year.  Such formula shall utilize both a percentage of the change in the EVA of the Company from the prior Plan Year, whether positive or negative, plus a percentage of the positive EVA, if any, in the current Plan Year.  Unless and until revised by the Committee, the Bonus Pool for the Company shall be determined as follows:

If Prior Year EVA was:	The Current Plan Year EVA Formula is:
Positive	10% of the change in EVA (positive or negative) from prior Plan Year plus 6% of any positive EVA in current Plan Year
Negative	15% of the change in EVA (positive or negative) from prior Plan Year

6. Determination of Participant EVA Awards.

            Each Participant’s EVA Award for a Plan Year shall be equal to the Bonus Pool for such Plan Year multiplied by such Participant’s Participation Percentage.  The Chief Executive Officer will retain discretion to revise a Participant’s Participation Percentage if the Chief Executive Officer deems it appropriate as circumstances develop during the Plan Year; provided, however, in the case of an executive officer who is subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, such revision may be made only by the Committee and may only have a negative effect on the amount of such Participant’s EVA Award for the Plan Year.  As soon as practicable after the end of the Plan Year, the Committee will review and adopt a resolution approving the calculation of EVA, the Bonus Pool and the EVA Award for each Participant pursuant to the formula established at the beginning of the year (revised downward if the Committee so determines); provided, however, that no EVA Award with respect to any executive officer who is subject to the limitations of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code may exceed $3,000,000 for any particular Plan Year.

7.  Annual Payouts and Allocations to Participants’ Bank Accounts.

            (a)   Annual Payout for 2002. For Plan Year 2002, as soon as practicable after each Participant’s EVA Award for such Plan Year has been determined, the EVA Award shall be credited or debited to the Participant’s Bank Account, and the Participant will receive an Annual Payout, in the form of a lump sum cash payment, in an amount equal to the greater of (i) one-third of the Participant’s Bank Account following such credit or debit or (ii) 75% of the Participant’s Target Bonus for the Plan Year multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the Company’s operating profit for the Plan Year as set forth in the Company’s audited financial statements (excluding charges for asbestos claims) and the denominator of which is $168 million.  Any balance remaining in a Participant’s Bank Account after the cash payment described in the immediately preceding sentence is made shall be immediately distributable to such Participant in the form of a number of shares of restricted Company Common Stock having a fair market value as of the date of grant (as determined by the Committee) equal to such remaining Bank Account balance.  Such restricted stock shall be granted pursuant to, and subject to the terms and conditions of, the Crane Co. 2001 Stock Incentive Plan and shall vest in substantially equal installments

on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of grant.  Additional provisions applicable to such restricted shares are set forth in Section 8 below.

            (b)   Annual Payout after 2002.  For each Plan Year after 2002, as soon as practicable after each Participant’s EVA Award for such Plan Year has been determined, each Participant shall receive an Annual Payout equal to the lesser of (i) the total amount of such EVA Award or (ii) the Participant’s Target Bonus.  If a Participant’s EVA Award exceeds such Target Bonus amount for that Plan Year, the excess shall be credited to the Participant’s Bank Account and there shall be added to the Annual Payout described in the immediately preceding sentence an amount equal to one-third (1/3) of the amount in the Participant’s Bank Account following such credit.  If a Participant’s EVA Award is less than the Target Bonus amount for that Plan Year, the Participant shall receive an additional amount from the Participant’s Bank Account until the total amount received, including the EVA Award, equals the Target Bonus, and if there is any remaining amount in the Participant’s Bank Account after such payment, the Participant shall receive one-third of such remaining amount.  All Annual Payouts shall be paid in a lump sum as soon as practicable after the Annual Payout amounts are determined by the Committee. 

            (c)   Bank Account.  Following payment of the Annual Payout as described above, the remainder of the Bank Account balance will represent the Participant’s “equity” in his or her EVA Bank Account for future years.  Interest shall be credited to the undistributed positive amount credited to each Participant’s Bank Account at the rate of 6% per annum.

8. Treatment of Participants’ Bank Accounts Upon Termination of Employment or Other Events.

If a Participant leaves the Company by reason of termination or resignation or ceases to be eligible to participate in the Plan, his or her Bank Account balance will be treated as follows:

EVENT	DISPOSITION OF ACCOUNT BALANCE/RESTRICTED SHARES
Terminate/quit	Lose Bank Account balance; forfeit unvested restricted shares
Removed from plan/demotion	Bank Account balance paid out in two equal installments on the two succeeding Annual Payout dates; restricted shares continue to vest
Unit sold by Crane Co.	Receive Bank Account balance in cash; all restricted shares become fully vested
Normal retirement at age 65/death/disability	Receive Bank Account balance in cash; all restricted shares become fully vested
Unit spun off	No payout; Bank Account balance continued with spun off company; all restricted shares become fully vested
Crane Co. acquired	Receive Bank Account balance in cash; all restricted shares become fully vested
Transfer to another business unit	Bank Account balance transfers with Participant to new unit; restricted shares continue to vest

9.  Miscellaneous.

            (a)   Plan Amendment and Termination.  The Board may modify, suspend or terminate the Plan at any time.

            (b)   Effect of Award on Other Employee Benefits.  By acceptance of participation in this Plan, each Participant agrees that his or her EVA Award is special additional compensation and that it will not affect any employee benefit, e.g., life insurance, etc., in which the recipient participates, except that

Annual Payouts made under this Plan shall be included in the employee’s compensation for purposes of the Company’s qualified and nonqualified retirement and savings plan.

            (c)   Right to Continued Employment; Additional Awards. The receipt of an EVA Award shall not give the Participant any right to continued employment, and the right and power to dismiss any Participant from his or her employment is specifically reserved to the Company. In addition, the receipt of an EVA Award with respect to any Plan Year shall not entitle the recipient to an EVA Award with respect to any subsequent Plan Year.

            (d)   Adjustments to Performance Goals. When a performance goal is based on EVA or other quantifiable financial or accounting measure, it may be necessary to exclude significant non-budgeted or non-controllable gains or losses from actual financial results in order to properly measure performance. The Committee will decide those items that shall be considered in adjusting actual results.

            (e)   Withholding Taxes. The Company shall have the right to deduct from all payments under this Plan any Federal, state or local taxes required by law to be withheld with respect to such payments.

            (f)   Governing Law. This Plan shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, other than the conflict of law provisions thereof.

EX-11

Exhibit 11

CRANE CO. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Exhibit 11 to FORM 10-K
Annual Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2002

Computation of Net Income Per Share
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)

		2002			2001		2000		1999		1998
Basic
Income from continuing operations		$	16,628		$	88,620	$	123,729	$	100,898	$	124,842
Income from discontinued operations			—			—		—		13,672		13,596
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			(28,076	)		—		—		—		—
Net (loss) income		$	(11,448	)	$	88,620	$	123,729	$	114,570	$	138,438
Income from continuing operations		$	0.28		$	1.48	$	2.03	$	1.51	$	1.82
Income from discontinued operations			—			—		—		.20		.20
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			(0.47	)		—		—		—		—
Net (loss) income per share		$	(0.19	)	$	1.48	$	2.03	$	1.71	$	2.02
Weighted average number of basic shares			59,728			59,825		60,919		66,981		68,555
Diluted
Income from continuing operations		$	16,628		$	88,620	$	123,729	$	100,898	$	124,842
Income from discontinued operations			—			—		—		13,672		13,596
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			(28,076	)		—		—		—		—
Net (loss) income		$	(11,448	)	$	88,620	$	123,729	$	114,570	$	138,438
Income from continuing operations		$	0.28		$	1.47	$	2.02	$	1.50	$	1.80
Income from discontinued operations			—			—		—		.20		.20
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle			(0.47	)		—		—		—		—
Net (loss) income per share		$	(0.19	)	$	1.47	$	2.02	$	1.70	$	2.00
Weighted average number of basic shares			59,728			59,825		60,919		66,981		68,555
Add:
Adjustment to basic shares for dilutive stock options  *			—			530		480		479		813
Total weighted average number of shares			59,728			60,355		61,399		67,460		69,368
	* For the year ended 2002, 318,000 shares attributable to the exercise of outstanding options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was anti-dilutive.

EX-13

Exhibit 13

In 2002, we built a stronger company using our established operating themes: leveraging intellectual capital, improving customer focus, achieving operational excellence and strategically by linkages among our businesses and acquisitions. Our ability to capitalize on opportunities and benefit fully when our markets improve has been enhanced by the investments we made in our business in the last year.

1 Financial Highlights

4 Letter to Shareholders

13 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Operations

24 Consolidated Financial Statements

28 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

40 Management’s Responsibility for Financial Reporting

40 Independent Auditors’ Report

41 2001 Review: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Operations

46 Five Year Summary of Selected Financial Data

46 Quarterly Results for the Year

47 Market and Dividend Information—Crane Co. Common Shares

47 Crane Co. Common Share Ownership

48 Corporate Governance

49 Directors and Officers & Shareholder Information

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

($ and shares in thousands except per share data)
Summary of Operations	2002			2001
Net sales	$	1,516,347		$	1,587,180
Operating profit:
As reported		39,671			171,684
As adjusted(a)		154,956			198,093
Net (loss) income:
As reported		(11,448	)		88,620
As adjusted(b)		95,022			119,523
Cash flow from operating activities		197,441			197,562
Free cash flow(c)		148,048			141,500
Adjusted EBITDA(d)		204,143			232,767
Share Data
Net (loss) income	$	(0.19	)	$	1.47
Dividends		.40			.40
Average diluted shares outstanding		59,728			60,355
Financial Position at December 31,
Assets	$	1,413,696		$	1,292,115
Net debt		217,282			283,023
Shareholders’ equity		649,062			651,295
Market value of equity		1,184,790			1,530,448
Market capitalization		1,402,072			1,813,471
Key Statistics
Operating margins:
As reported		2.6	%		10.8	%
As adjusted(a)		10.2	%		12.5	%
Return on average shareholders’ equity:
As reported		(1.7	)%		14.2	%
As adjusted(b)		14.3	%		16.1	%
Net debt to total capitalization		25.1	%		30.3	%

(a) In 2002, excludes asbestos-related charges of $115.3 million. In 2001, excludes asbestos-related charges ($2.2 million), a special charge for stock-based compensation cost relating to the retirement of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer ($6.1 million) and goodwill amortization ($18.1 million).

(b) In 2002, excludes the aforementioned asbestos-related charges and the cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle related to goodwill totaling $106.5 million ($1.78 per share after tax). In 2001, excludes the stock-based compensation cost, asbestos-related charges, goodwill amortization and a loss on disposal of a business totaling $30.9 million ($0.51 per share after tax).

(c) Free cash flow is cash flow from operating activities less dividends and capital expenditures.

(d) Adjusted EBITDA is net income before a change in accounting principle, interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization and asbestos-related charges.

Free cash flow and adjusted EBITDA are considered measures of financial performance and liquidity and should be considered in addition to, but not as a substitute for, other measures of financial performance and liquidity reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and may be inconsistent with similar measures presented by other companies.

1

(a) Excludes asbestos-related charges of $115.3 million ($78.4 million after-tax) in 2002 and $2.2 million ($1.5 million after-tax) in 2001.

Throughout our businesses, we are laying the foundation for profitable growth. WE BELIEVE PASSIONATELY that training every person at Crane to wield the tools to constantly improve these customer-driven metrics will fuel profitable growth. As doing business with us becomes faster, better and easier, operational excellence is at the core of how we are making ourselves formidable competitors. Striving to attain our three-year goals, we deploy all our intellectual capital to develop solution sets that reduce the cost of ownership for our customers to help ensure that we are the supplier of CHOICE.

LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

Dear Shareholder:

We entered 2002 with a highly uncertain post-9/11 economic environment and a business plan forecasting a decline in operating income due to the downturn in commercial aerospace and the end of the Euro conversion boom at our coin changer business. In this environment, our goals were to execute the operating plan and materially improve our businesses while maintaining our financial strength. The most significant unanticipated issue during the year was the substantial increase in asbestos claims.

Operating results were generally as anticipated, with the declines in Aerospace and Merchandising Systems reducing operating profits by $50 million. As a result, operating income was $155 million versus $198 million in 2001, excluding asbestos charges, goodwill amortization and certain stock-based retirement costs. Considerable progress was made in materially improving our businesses as our operating themes of leveraging intellectual capital, improving customer focus and executing our operational excellence program were driven deeper and more broadly throughout the Company. Today, “Crane University,” “Crane helping Crane” and “making it ugly” are ingrained in our culture to drive improvement in our businesses.

Financially we have never been stronger. Cash flow from operating activities totaled $197 million and after capital expenditures and dividends was $148 million, substantially exceeding our goal of $120 million. We reduced debt by $59 million during the year and completed $82 million of acquisitions, finishing the year with a very conservative leverage ratio of 25%.

Although I remain concerned about continued uncertainty in the aerospace industry and weakness in the chemical processing industry, we expect our earnings per share in 2003 to be in the range of $1.65 to $1.75, compared with the $.28 per share reported in 2002 which included $1.31 per share of asbestos charges.

Financial Results

Sales in 2002 declined 4.5% to $1.516 billion compared with $1.587 billion in 2001. As anticipated, the aerospace market was exceptionally poor following the events of 9/11/01 and accounted for a $65 million, or 16%, decline in sales. The chemical processing industry, a large market for our Fluid Handling segment, operated at its lowest level of capacity utilization in twenty years. The completion of the changeover to Euro coinage brought an abrupt end to high demand for electronic coin validators and changers sold by our NRI unit causing sales to drop from $77 million in 2001 to $26 million in 2002, a 66% decline. The only strong market for Crane during the year was the recreational vehicle (“RV”) market served by our Kemlite business where sales were up 15%.

Net income before accounting change and before asbestos charges was $95 million in 2002, compared with 2001 net income of $119.5 million (before $16.9 million for goodwill

4

LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

amortization, $1.5 million for asbestos charges, $8.5 million for the loss on the Crane Plumbing sale and $4 million for stock-based retirement costs). The Company’s 2002 income before the change in accounting principle, as reported, was $16.6 million, or $.28 per share, compared to $88.6 million, or $1.47 per share, for the same period of 2001. The change in accounting principle related to goodwill reduced 2002 income by $28.1 million, or $.47 per share, resulting in a net loss of $11.4 million.

The significant increase in asbestos claims was not anticipated. Pending asbestos claims increased from 16,180 at the end of 2001 to 54,038 at the end of 2002. During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a non-cash charge of $73 million after-tax ($1.23 per share) to increase its net estimated liability for asbestos-related costs. The asbestos charge reflects the recent significant increase in the rate of new claims filed and the estimated settlement and defense costs of pending and future asbestos claims through 2007, net of estimated insurance recoveries. It is important to note that Crane is typically among a number of defendants in these claims, usually over 50 and frequently in the hundreds. The Company never manufactured any asbestos product or any asbestos-containing material, but certain of our valves, pumps and other products contained asbestos material that was encapsulated inside our product. Although our normal practice is to rigorously challenge each claim in terms of product identification, the sheer volume of claims forces Crane and other defendants to settle more often than we would like. There is a growing consensus that asbestos litigation has brought our judicial system to the breaking point, and a legislative solution from Congress is essential.

Strategy for Profitable Growth

In last year’s annual report I described in some detail our management philosophy of making Crane a more integrated operating company to grow Economic Value Added (“EVA”). This is our program to create value by materially improving our existing operations and looking for additional profits from having units work more closely together — what we call strategic linkages. Our strategy is to take the excess cash flow from these improved businesses and to execute acquisitions that will further strengthen their competitive positions. We made substantial progress in executing these strategies in 2002.

We are improving our operations across the board using three basic themes: leveraging intellectual capital, improving customer focus and executing on our operational excellence program. We believe all progress starts with having the best people and a performance culture with trust and respect.

In 2002, we retained all of our highly regarded business unit presidents and made substantial progress on our “Crane 200” program which put in place formal reviews and development plans for our top 270 leaders. We remain strongly committed to leveraging best practices throughout the Company, spending $6 million in training through our virtual Crane University. In improving our customer focus, we recruited 12 new senior sales and marketing personnel, surveyed customers to learn specifically what we need to do to outperform the competition, conducted front-end business reviews including quote capture systems and utilized our operational excellence program to emphasize making it “faster, better and easier” to do business with Crane. Operational Excellence results were clearly evident as inventory turns improved from 3.4x to 3.8x while on-time delivery improved from 81% in January 2001 to 92% in December 2002. Quality has been maintained as lead time was reduced from 37 days to 32 days during 2002. Today at Crane Co., it is understood that you not only have to deliver financial results, but you must also improve your customer metrics by executing a program of continuous improvement.

We also look to grow profits through strategic linkages among our businesses. Over the past two years, we sold four small units that could not be leveraged with the rest of the Company, while another unit was successfully contributed to a joint venture and four others were merged into larger existing units as strategic internal acquisitions. We believe a smaller number of larger units will increase the quality and consistency of our management teams, allowing us to better understand the value proposition to the customer and reduce business risks.

In 2002 we focused particularly on driving strategic linkages in our aerospace and valve businesses, both to reduce costs and to enhance our ability to grow profitable sales. We initiated a reorganization of our aerospace businesses into two focused groups to align ourselves with two differentiated markets: aerospace and electronics. The Aerospace Group includes Hydro-Aire/Lear Romec and ELDEC operations, as well as the flexible hose and fittings business of Resistoflex-Aerospace. The Resistoflex-Aerospace products will allow us to add more value in aerospace fluid solutions and will be marketed through the aerospace sales force. These units will operate as one company allowing us to reduce the overhead structure for an expected $8 million reduction in our costs in 2003. This is in addition to reductions in our workforce and other costs which enabled us to hold margins in 2002. This new structure will preserve and enhance our ability to invest in the development of new products and services, and will also provide for more efficient integration of acquisitions.

6

LETTER TO SHAREHOLDERS

The Electronics Group includes Interpoint, the power supply business of ELDEC and the recently acquired General Technology Corporation. This group has been formed to enhance our ability to capitalize on the opportunity for growth in microelectronics for the military/aerospace and medical markets. During the year we transferred the management responsibility for ELDEC’s electronic power supplies to the Electronics Group to ensure that we bring a complete range of power supply solutions to our customers. The acquisition of General Technology Corporation further strengthened our microelectronics manufacturing capabilities.

In our Fluid Handling segment, particularly our $500 million global valve business, we are utilizing strategic linkages to change our business model and improve operating margins from 7.5% today to our goal of 12%. Specifically, we are transitioning from eight industrial valve units to one global valve company which facilitates consolidating plants, shifting manufacturing to low cost countries, integrating procurement activities to leverage volume with suppliers and, importantly, accelerating the sale of existing products into new market opportunities. For example, in 2002 we announced the consolidation of CVNA’s Long Beach facility into Xomox’s Chihuahua, Mexico facility. Our production plans for 2003 are to leverage as one company our eight low cost production facilities in China, India, Mexico and Hungary – up from three just two years ago. Procurement plans for castings, our major material cost, are being overseen and consolidated by one focused team. In transitioning to a global valve company we have found opportunities to cross-sell our existing valve brands, further expanding our product offerings and extending our markets. These synergy sales increased by $6 million in 2002 and are expected to increase an additional $13 million in 2003.

Strategic acquisitions are also an integral part of our profitable growth strategy. In 2002, we spent $82 million on seven acquisitions and made one small divestiture. The two most significant acquisitions were Lasco Composites LP for $44 million and General Technology Corporation for $25 million. The acquisition of Lasco gave Kemlite important increased presence in the industrial market. The Lasco business has been seamlessly integrated, and we have been able to exceed our planned synergies goal of $2 million. General Technology provides high-reliability customized electronic manufacturing services and products focused on military and defense applications, and significantly expands our electronics business. While the timing of acquisitions is unpredictable, we hope to increase the number and size of our strategic acquisitions.

Corporate Governance

In view of the revelations in the last year and a half of corporate malfeasance at several large companies, it is appropriate to comment briefly on some of our long-established policies. With regard to accounting practices, we write off receivables if they become 90 days past due, with no exceptions. We never book sales until the product is shipped. We have only two minor off-balance sheet items that are disclosed in the footnotes to our financial statements, namely our Ferguson joint venture with Emerson, and a financing facility for customers of our Crane Merchandising Systems business. We do not make loans to corporate officers.

Crane’s Board of Directors is comprised of ten individuals and, with the exception of our non-executive Chairman and me, none of them are employed by Crane or have retired from the Company. The audit, compensation and nominating committees of the Board consist entirely of independent directors. We do not have consulting or other business arrangements with any of our outside directors.

Outlook for 2003

The outlook for two of our largest markets, aerospace and chemical processing, remains weak. We believe that operating profit from our Aerospace segment will be lower in 2003. However, we are forecasting margin improvement in our Fluid Handling business, modest recovery in Merchandising Systems and continued progress at Engineered Materials. In aggregate, we are forecasting an increase in operating profit from $155 million (before asbestos charges) this year to $160-$170 million, or net income of $1.65-$1.75 per share. Free cash flow after dividends and capital expenditures in 2003 will again exceed $120 million.

My confidence in the quality of our people and our businesses remains steadfast. With a strong foundation of good people and good practices in place, I expect the implementation of our profitable growth strategy to begin to produce results for our shareholders in 2003 and over the long term. I deeply appreciate the dedication and hard work of our employees, the guidance and encouragement of our Board of Directors and your support as shareholders.

Sincerely,

Eric C. Fast

President and Chief Executive Officer

FEBRUARY 14, 2003

7

Ready. Set. Grow.

The Aerospace segment has two business focuses, aerospace and electronics. Aerospace products include pressure, fuel flow and position sensors and subsystems; aircraft electrical power components and subsystems; brake control systems; and coolant, lube and fuel pumps. Electronic products include high-reliability power supplies products and custom microelectronics for a variety of industries. Businesses in this segment hold market-leading positions.

The Engineered Materials segment consists of Kemlite and Polyflon. Kemlite is the world’s largest manufacturer of fiberglass reinforced plastic panels. Its success has been based on developing new, innovative products for transportation, recreational vehicle, commercial building product and industrial applications. It has been a consistent market leader and holds a number of patents on its products.

The Merchandising Systems segment is made up of two parts: Crane Merchandising Systems (“CMS”) which makes food, snack, and beverage vending machines, and National Rejectors (“NRI”) which makes coin changers and validators in Europe.

CMS has a strong market share in North America and benefits from having a direct sales and service team that enables it to offer excellent customer service. NRI’s competitive advantage is double currency capabilities for coin-changing machines.

The Fluid Handling segment manufactures and sells industrial valves and actuators; provides valve testing, service and parts; manufactures and sells pumps and water treatment systems; and distributes pipe, valves and fittings. Its well-recognized brand names, such as Crane,^® Pacific,^® Xomox,^® Saunders,^® Stockham,^® Flowseal,^® Duochek,^® Centerline,^® Jenkins,^® DEPA,^TM ELRO^TM and REVO^TM enjoy good market positions in a number of geographic areas.

The Controls segment includes Barksdale, a producer of ride-leveling, air-suspension control valves for heavy trucks and trailers, as well as pressure, temperature and level sensors used in a range of industrial machinery and equipment and in the marine and mobile hydraulics markets. Azonix/Dynalco is an established manufacturer of electronic human machine interface panels for harsh and hazardous environments, typically found on oil rigs and platforms, and large engine monitoring and diagnostic systems.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

In the pages that follow, we discuss results, along with the events, trends, market dynamics and management initiatives that influenced them.

	Sales						Operating Profit *
(dollars in millions)	2002			2001			2002			2001
Aerospace	$	340.8		$	406.0		$	70.7		$	100.9
Engineered Materials		233.2			234.3			44.4			33.0
Merchandising Systems		161.9			216.4			7.2			28.4
Fluid Handling		715.8			630.9			53.7			49.0
Controls		64.8			101.9			4.8			3.9
Elimination		(0.2	)		(2.3	)		—			—
Reporting segment sales and operating profit		1,516.3			1,587.2			180.8			215.2
Corporate – before asbestos charges		—			—			(25.8	)		(23.2	)
Corporate – asbestos charges		—			—			(115.3	)		(2.2	)
Goodwill amortization		—			—			—			(18.1	)
Total sales and operating profit	$	1,516.3		$	1,587.2		$	39.7		$	171.7

* In 2002, there were two reclassifications that affect segment results. First, 2001 segment results have been reclassified for goodwill amortization; and second, the 2002 and 2001 segment results have been reclassified to reflect the movement of Resistoflex from Engineered Materials to Aerospace and Fluid Handling.

Overview

As anticipated, the Aerospace results reflect the deterioration in the commercial aerospace market as a result of the events of September 11th, and Merchandising Systems results were significantly lower in 2002 as the demand for coin-changing equipment fell sharply subsequent to the Euro conversion in 2001. Engineered Materials results reflect the 2002 acquisition of Lasco combined with strong demand for fiberglass reinforced plastic panels in the recreational vehicle (“RV”) market in 2002. Fluid Handling results were improved by having a full year of results from the 2001 acquisitions of Xomox and Crane Process Flow Technologies partially offset by the continuing decline in the chemical processing industry (“CPI”) and the abrupt fall off in the power industry. Controls profits were improved reflecting the 2001 sale of Powers Process Controls and the contribution of the Ferguson business to a joint venture.

During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a non-cash, pre-tax charge of $107.9 million ($73.3 million after tax) increasing the annual pre-tax asbestos charge to $115.3 million ($78.4 million after tax). The 2002 asbestos charge reflects the recent significant increase in the rate of new claims filed and the estimated settlement and defense costs of pending and future asbestos claims through 2007, net of estimated insurance recoveries. Total cash payments for settlement and defense costs were $1.4 million in 2002, $820,000 in 2001 and $270,000 in 2000, reflecting the impact of payment terms and insurance reimbursements to date.

13

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Aerospace

(dollars in millions)	2002			2001 *
Net sales	$	340.8		$	406.0
Operating profit		70.7			100.9
Gross margin		42.3	%		45.0	%
Operating margin		20.7	%		24.8	%

* Reclassified for goodwill amortization and to include the movement of Resistoflex-Aerospace from Engineered Materials (see segment information on page 38).

Overview

Aerospace manufactures a broad range of products for the aerospace industry, such as pressure, fuel flow and position sensors and subsystems, aircraft electrical power components and subsystems, brake control systems, coolant, lube and fuel pumps, as well as a broad range of electronic products, such as high-reliability power supplies and custom microelectronics for a variety of industries. Business units within this segment include: Hydro-Aire/Lear Romec, ELDEC, Resistoflex-Aerospace, Interpoint and General Technology Corporation (“GTC”).

In November 2002, Crane acquired GTC, a strategic acquisition for Interpoint that extended its already strong position in the electronics market, for a purchase price of $25 million. GTC provides high-reliability, customized-contract manufacturing services and products focused on military and defense applications.

In 2002, Aerospace commenced an internal reorganization to recognize the market uniqueness of aerospace and electronics by organizing itself into these two focus areas to seek customer solutions for these discrete markets. At the same time, a New Ventures initiative was established within the segment to utilize incubator teams to develop new, profitable products. This new structure is expected to be completed in 2003 enabling the segment to reduce operating costs, better leverage intellectual capital and improve its focus on customer solutions. It also provides the structure for efficient integration of acquisitions and elimination of duplicate overhead and capital expenditures. These units will operate as one company which will reduce the overhead structure for an expected $8 million reduction in 2003 costs.

At the end of 2002, Resistoflex-Aerospace was reclassified into Aerospace from Engineered Materials. Resistoflex-Aerospace will benefit from inclusion in Aerospace as their Teflon^® hoses and product fittings are synergistic to the Fluid Solutions market promoted by Aerospace. These products are used by the same customers to provide linkages to existing product applications and marketed by the same Aerospace Regional Business Manager.

2002 Operating Results

Aerospace sales and operating profit declined 16% and 30%, respectively, in 2002. As anticipated, the aerospace sector was weak throughout the year following the events of September 11th as end markets reflected declining new plane build schedules by the original equipment manufacturers (“OEMs”) and financial difficulties of commercial carriers. Operating profit was impacted by reduced volume and also by a $4 million charge for inspecting approximately 35,000 Hydro-Aire fuel pumps. Interpoint, a manufacturer of microelectronic assemblies, had a very strong year with substantially higher profit margins despite lower sales volumes. It continued to leverage its low-cost manufacturing facility in Taiwan, incorporate process improvements and improve its product mix. Despite difficult end-market conditions, the Aerospace segment achieved 20.7% operating margins.

Broken down by major markets, aerospace made up 75% of sales while electronics made up 25% of sales in 2002.

Electronics includes Interpoint and the power supply businesses of ELDEC. Within aerospace, 70% of sales went to OEMs and 30% to the aftermarket including repair and overhaul. The 2002 OEM customer base was comprised of commercial customers (37%), regional/general aviation customers (22%), military/government customers (26%) and power customers (15%).

14

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Hydro-Aire/Lear Romec and ELDEC continued to work to reduce costs, adjust the size of their businesses and address joint business model strategies to respond to and anticipate the ever-changing aerospace market.

Hydro-Aire/Lear Romec produced approximately 40% of the total segment sales. Hydro-Aire maintained its world-leading market share in antiskid brake control systems. Hydro-Aire/Lear Romec had strong showings in the commercial, regional, business and military markets, with several new program wins for each brand.

ELDEC produced approximately 40% of the total segment sales and maintained strong profitability while continuing to invest in new programs with funding that became available, in part, through their cost-reducing operational excellence initiatives. ELDEC’s business includes aircraft mounted sensing and control components and subsystems, such as proximity sensing, fuel flow and pressure sensors, as well as aircraft electrical power components and subsystems such as transformer rectifiers, battery systems and uninterruptible power systems for flight controls.

Resistoflex-Aerospace, approximately 4% of total segment sales, had a sales increase of 26% over 2001. Resistoflex-Aerospace produces Teflon^®-lined hoses and specialty fittings for aircraft systems and engine applications. Their patented Nut-Lok^® fitting was selected for the Joint Strike Fighter.

Interpoint produced approximately 16% of the total segment 2002 sales. A manufacturer of power supplies and microelectronic assemblies, Interpoint continued its strong financial performance in 2002. While its sales declined 14%, its operating profit increased 42%. Interpoint’s results reflect the optimization of its low cost Taiwan production facility and the successful implementation of operational excellence processes.

During 2002, Aerospace continued to intensify its research and development activities with regard to safety and reducing the cost of operating aircraft, which have now been organized into the New Ventures component of the segment. These activities are directed at retrofit applications to address the installed base of approximately 13,000 aircraft.

Outlook

Aerospace continues to face a very challenging market environment. As airlines continue to experience deep financial losses and declining passenger traffic, production rates for new commercial, regional and business jets are expected to continue to decrease. Further, a large number of aircraft have been removed from service. These “parked aircraft” negatively affect demand for aftermarket sales of maintenance and repair products. It is currently unclear whether the number of parked aircraft has stabilized. The health of the global aerospace aftermarket varies according to geographical segments. While the U.S. market has been negatively impacted, there is growth in the Asian commercial airlines and greater stability in the European aftermarket. Crane’s aftermarket business is globally diversified.

We expect the traditional aerospace market to remain weak in 2003 and, assuming current published OEM production levels and relatively stable aftermarket maintenance activity, a further 10% reduction in operating profits from 2002 levels is planned.

15

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Engineered Materials

(dollars in millions)	2002			2001 *
Net sales	$	233.2		$	234.3
Operating profit		44.4			33.0
Gross margin		27.7	%		23.7	%
Operating margin		19.0	%		14.1	%

* Reclassified for goodwill amortization and to reflect the movement of Resistoflex to Aerospace and Fluid Handling (see segment information on page 38).

Overview

Engineered Materials has gone through significant change. In 2001, this segment was comprised of four business units: the Crane Plumbing business (“Plumbing”), Kemlite/CorTec, Resistoflex and Polyflon. As part of the Company’s effort to divest non-core marginal or unprofitable businesses, Plumbing was sold in September 2001, and CorTec was sold in September 2002. In 2001, these two businesses generated sales of $41.1 million and an operating loss of $3.0 million. In 2002, CorTec, prior to its sale in September, had sales of $10.5 million and an operating loss of $1.3 million. At the end of 2002, Resistoflex was reclassified to Aerospace and Fluid Handling to align business management with similar end markets and remove costs through integration and consolidation of business functions. Presently, the Engineered Materials segment consists of two business units, Kemlite and Polyflon.

Kemlite manufactures fiberglass-reinforced plastic (“FRP”) panels for recreational vehicles (“RV”), truck trailers, building products and industrial building materials. Polyflon designs and manufactures microwave laminates, high-voltage radio frequency capacitors and other specialty components with total sales of $1.7 million in 2002.

Crane’s strategic acquisition of Lasco Composites LP (“Lasco”) for $44 million in May 2002 gave Kemlite important increased presence in the industrial market. Lasco supplies the FRP panel market under several product brand names, including: Lascoboard^® , TransTuff^™ , CrystalLite^™ , Lascolite^™ , and Everstrong^™ . Industrial market applications include opaque corrugated panels for cooling tower exteriors, roof and wall exterior panels in corrosive environments and metal building daylighting panels.

2002 Operating Results

Engineered Materials sales of $233.2 million were down slightly from $234.3 million in 2001. Sales increases from the Lasco acquisition and the strong RV market were offset by reduced sales of $30.6 million of sales resulting from the two divestitures previously mentioned. Operating profit increased $11.4 million in 2002 compared with 2001 as strong results at Kemlite, aided by the Lasco acquisition, accounted for $9.7 million of the increase. Exiting the non-performing plumbing and CorTec businesses provided the remaining $1.7 million of operating profit improvement. Engineered Materials operating margins were 19.0% versus 14.1%.

Kemlite’s sales and operating profit increased by 15% and 27%, respectively. Operating margins in 2002 were 20.6% compared with 18.7% in 2001 as a result of strong RV sales and continued improvements in operating efficiencies and procurement. Sales of FRP panels were strong throughout the year from strengthened RV demand. Translucent roofs for truck trailers and sales of building products were down modestly from the prior year level.

As part of Kemlite’s programs to achieve operational excellence, it has focused on reducing costs and working capital. Operating efficiencies have been achieved on the plant floor to reduce waste, raw material costs have been lowered through negotiation with suppliers, alternate materials and formulations have been evaluated and inventory has been reduced. Inventory turns have increased from 9.1 times in 2001 to 12.4 times in 2002.

Outlook

As a result of its focus on customer needs, Kemlite has developed several programs to foster profitable sales growth. It is seeking to expand existing markets and develop new markets by fostering the substitution of competitive products with FRP panels. For instance, in the transportation industry, target substitutions include aluminum in dry van and refrigerated van roofs, steel, aluminum, wood and thermoplastic scuff panels in transportation trailers and aluminum exterior sidewall panels. In the RV market, some substitution targets are aluminum travel-trailer sidewalls, aluminum and hand laid-up motor home sidewalls, and rubber roofing. It is also expanding its international sales, particularly in Europe.

In addition to market expansion through existing products, Kemlite continues to invest in new product development, an example of which is a high-pressure, laminate-faced decorative FRP panel. Kemlite expects to sell this as a product substitution in the seating and entrance areas of fast food restaurants replacing wallpaper or other decorative covering. FRP paneling has already been very successful in the food preparation and bathroom areas; this new product family is expected to provide incremental sales opportunities.

Engineered Materials operating results are expected to be up 20% in 2003, based on the improving strength in the transportation market and the continued strength of the RV market.

16

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Merchandising Systems

(dollars in millions)	2002			2001 *
Net sales	$	161.9		$	216.4
Operating profit		7.2			28.4
Gross margin		28.8	%		32.9	%
Operating margin		4.4	%		13.1	%

* Reclassified for goodwill amortization (see segment information on page 38).

Overview

The Merchandising Systems segment is comprised of two businesses: Crane Merchandising Systems (“CMS”) which makes food, snack and beverage vending machines, and National Rejectors (“NRI”) which makes coin changers and validators.

2002 Operating Results

Segment sales declined 25% from $216.4 million to $161.9 million in 2002 and operating profit decreased to $7.2 million versus $28.4 million in 2001. Segment operating results were significantly lower in 2002 because of the impact on NRI of the completion of the Euro conversion in 2001. CMS’ results improved in 2002.

CMS sales of $136 million stabilized in 2002 with sales down 2% compared to 2001. Sales declined 22% in 2001 compared with 2000. On the lower sales, operating profit increased in 2002 as margins improved to 6.0% versus 3.2% in 2001. The U.S. economy continued to slow during 2002 mitigating otherwise strong financial and operational improvements. The economic slowdown resulted in increased layoffs at offices and factories where the bulk of vending machines are installed.

Approximately 75% and 25%, respectively, of CMS’s business is in the North American and European traditional operator vending markets. The strategic competitive advantage in the North American market is the CMS direct sales business model. This allows CMS to provide shorter lead-time on equipment purchases and faster and better customer service. Through its initiatives in introducing new products and new features, CMS can offer the operators reduced equipment cost and demonstrate achievable reductions in cost of operating the equipment. One of the operator’s biggest costs is managing parts. CMS’s new online ordering capabilities, upgraded logistics systems and revamped warehousing facilities, launched in 2002, provide the operator with 24 hour parts delivery and a management reporting system on parts usage.

CMS continued to improve its operations by continuing to invest in new products focused on improving operator profitability. CMS launched new features, new products and updated technology in 2002. Its new guaranteed delivery system called SureVend^® guarantees the customer receives the product or gets his money back. In addition, CMS introduced a new frozen food vending machine which added $4 million of incremental sales in 2002.

CMS has been focusing on operational excellence to significantly increase its customer focus. CMS inventory turnover has improved 25% and operating working capital as a percentage of sales has been reduced from 28% in 2001 to 23% at the end of 2002. Customer metric improvements in 2002 compared with 2001 included on-time deliveries and lead-times down to 6 days from 11 days.

NRI, based in Germany, has a strong competitive product line and had an extraordinarily strong sales and profit year in 2001 due to the Euro conversion. NRI 2002 net sales were down 66% to $26 million, compared with 2001 sales of $77 million, resulting in a slight operating loss in 2002 compared with a significant profit in the prior year. NRI began work force reductions in 2002 which will continue in 2003 to right-size the business to the new market demand levels.

Outlook

These businesses have experienced management teams, strong market positions and competitive new products. However, end-market demand in the automated merchandising market in both the U.S. and Europe is expected to remain relatively weak in 2003 with any market recovery to be very gradual at best. Management expects the European market will continue to experience weakness in Euro coin changer demand in 2003. NRI expects net sales to continue to be depressed in 2003 and expects to have an operating loss as it continues to take action to right-size its business to the demand levels. The Company expects only modest operating improvement in this segment during 2003.

17

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Fluid Handling

(dollars in millions)	2002			2001 *
Net sales	$	715.8		$	630.9
Operating profit		53.7			49.0
Gross margin		28.4	%		26.8	%
Operating margin		7.5	%		7.8	%

* Reclassified for goodwill amortization and to include the movement of Resistoflex-Industrial Products from Engineered Materials (see segment information on page 38).

Overview

The Fluid Handling segment manufactures and sells various types of industrial valves and actuators; provides valve testing, parts and services; manufactures and sells pumps and water treatment systems; distributes pipe, valves and fittings; and designs, manufactures and sells corrosion-resistant, plastic-lined pipes and fittings.

The Fluid Handling segment has gone through significant change. The strategic acquisition of two valve companies was completed in the first half of 2001, Xomox and Crane Process Flow Technologies. These acquisitions strengthened Fluid Handling’s position in the global valve industry through additional distribution channels and product offerings including premium brand names with market positions such as Xomox, Tuflin, Saunders, DEPA, ELRO and REVO.

Additionally, significant facility rationalization actions have been taken to improve manufacturing efficiency and capital utilization. The 2001 closure and sale of the Company’s pump manufacturing facility in Decatur, IL was completed in 2002. Also in 2002, closure of the Long Beach, CA valve manufacturing plant was announced and the shutdown of the Bay City, MI pipe and fitting operation for combination into the Marion, NC facility was substantially completed. Production from these locations has been consolidated into other Crane-owned manufacturing facilities offshore as well as domestically to leverage their lower cost of operation.

Finally, at the end of 2002, Resistoflex-Industrial Products was reclassified into Fluid Handling from Engineered Materials as an internal acquisition to align the business structure with end markets and remove costs through integration and consolidation of business functions. Resistoflex-Industrial Products is a manufacturer of corrosion-resistant, plastic-lined pipe for use primarily in the chemical, petrochemical, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper and water treatment industries.

2002 Operating Results

Fluid Handling’s 2002 net sales increased 13%, while operating profit rose 9%, primarily as a result of having a full year of results from the 2001 acquisitions of Xomox and Crane Process Flow Technologies. Weakness in key end markets, particularly the chemical process industry (“CPI”), and to a lesser extent the power industry, coupled with costs related to the closure of the Long Beach,CA and Bay City, MI facilities for consolidation into lower-cost manufacturing facilities hampered performance during 2002.

Net sales of the Valve Group increased 24% in 2002, while operating profit increased 13%. Excluding acquisitions, operating profit declined 12% on a slight 2002 sales increase. Valve shipments in 2002 reflect weakness in the CPI and power generation markets and reduced valve service revenue offset partially by strong performance in the marine valve market. Operating profit was also reduced in 2002 by expenses related to closure of the Long Beach, CA manufacturing facility to further migrate production to lower cost countries and integrate worldwide valve operations.

To capture synergies and size advantage, the valve businesses are operating as one global valve company as opposed to eight individual units. This new structure will allow the sales force to sell complementary products previously sold exclusively by the individual sales forces. In addition to sales, the structure facilitates manufacturing facility rationalization, integrated procurement activities to leverage volume with suppliers, and efficient utilization of the eight low-cost production facilities in China, India, Mexico and Hungary.

Resistoflex-Industrial Products was challenged by the depressed conditions in the chemical process market in 2002. Steps were taken to reduce costs by consolidating its North American operations into a single site in North Carolina, closing its Bay City, MI plant. This consolidation will be completed during early 2003. The investments made this year to align this business structure with markets and remove costs through integration and consolidation of business functions are expected to benefit 2003 and beyond.

Crane Pumps & Systems’ net sales declined 1%, as demand was weakened by the slowdown in the general industrial and chemical processing markets it serves. Operating profit increased significantly, 78%, in 2002 as compared with 2001 which included consolidation and severance costs related to the closure of its Decatur, IL manufacturing operation. As part of an overall Fluid Handling program to expand its sourcing of lower-cost components and finished products and widen its customer base, Crane Pumps & Systems established a joint venture in China at year end to produce pumps for the Chinese and export markets.

Net sales at Crane Supply, a Canada-based distributor of pipes, valves and fittings, were flat in 2002. Operating profit rose 17% over prior year levels, primarily from favorable product mix. Operating margin was 8.1% in 2002 as compared with 6.9% in 2001.

Outlook

The Fluid Handling segment sells into a broad range of industries, although it is still seeing continued weakness in its major markets. Capital spending in the chemical processing industry was at a 20-year low in 2002, and the market remains depressed. Another large market, power generation, experienced a sharp decline in turbine shipments in 2002 compared with the prior year, and a further decline is expected in 2003. The oil and gas and hydrocarbon processing industries also softened in 2002 and are expected to be flat in 2003.

The Company expects a 20% operating profit improvement for Fluid Handling in 2003 on slightly increased sales. Procurement and foreign sourcing initiatives, as well as facility rationalizations and sales synergies, are expected to offset the impact of continued weakness in the chemical process and power generation industries.

18

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Controls

(dollars in millions)	2002			2001 *
Net sales	$	64.8		$	101.9
Operating profit		4.8			3.9
Gross margin		39.5	%		35.1	%
Operating margin		7.4	%		3.9	%

*Reclassified for goodwill amortization (see segment information on page 38).

Overview

Controls has gone through significant change. In 2001, this segment included four business units: Powers Process Controls (“Powers”), Ferguson, Barksdale and Azonix/Dynalco.

Crane contributed its Ferguson business into a joint venture with Emerson Electric’s Commercial Cam Co. in September 2001, and the results in 2002 are accounted for under the equity method of accounting with Crane’s share of its income reported as non-operating income. Powers was also sold in 2001 to a strategic buyer at book value. These two operations in 2001 together accounted for $33.4 million in sales and an operating loss of $1.6 million.

As a result, in 2002 the Controls segment was comprised of just two businesses: Barksdale and Azonix/Dynalco. Barksdale is a producer of ride-leveling air suspension control valves for heavy trucks and trailers as well as pressure, temperature and level sensors used in a range of industrial machinery and equipment. Azonix/Dynalco is an established manufacturer of electronic human machine interface panels for harsh and hazardous environments typically found on oil rigs and platforms, as well as large engine/compressor monitoring and diagnostic systems.

2002 Operating Results

Controls net sales decreased $37.1 million. As noted, the divestiture of Powers and the formation of the joint venture involving Crane’s Ferguson business in 2001 accounted for $33.4 million of the sales decrease. The remaining decrease was driven by sales declines at Azonix/Dynalco. Segment operating profits increased from $3.9 million to $4.8 million reflecting the elimination of the $1.6 million in net loss from Ferguson and Powers and improved results at Barksdale.

Barksdale’s 2002 net sales increased 3%, as its transportation market benefited from increased truck buying in advance of new diesel emission regulations that took effect in October 2002. Other markets in oil and gas exploration and industrial machinery were flat compared to the previous year. Operating profit at Barksdale increased 54% because of operational improvements and product rationalization programs instituted in 2001.

Azonix/Dynalco net sales were down 17% as these businesses experienced a significant softening of demand in their oil and gas markets. Operating profit was down 30% on the lower volume despite stringent cost containment programs. Azonix/Dynalco made investments in new products which position it for future growth in new markets and are expected to contribute increased net sales in 2003.

Outlook

Controls enjoys strong market positions and proprietary products in a number of attractive niche markets. This advantage stems from core competencies in harsh and hazardous environment electronics, engine monitoring and diagnostics, and zero-leak control valve technology. In 2002, Controls began to leverage its core competencies across business units and apply its internally developed new sensor technology to enter new growth markets, such as on-road transportation and diesel engine monitoring and diagnostics. This strategic approach to growing the business includes building service capabilities to leverage its installed product base, broaden its value proposition and strengthen sales channels utilizing Internet-based systems such as RapidNet ^™.

In 2003, the segment will face uncertain end markets including weaknesses in the gas transmission market, industrial machinery and oil and gas exploration. Segment operating results are expected to improve slightly in 2003 versus 2002.

19

Corporate

(dollars in millions)	2002			2001
Corporate—before asbestos charges	$	(25.8	)	$	(23.2	)
Corporate—asbestos charges		(115.3	)		(2.2	)
Interest income		2.3			1.1
Interest expense		(16.9	)		(21.2	)
Miscellaneous—net		(0.6	)		(15.7	)
Effective tax rate on income		32.0	%		34.8	%

Corporate expense—before asbestos charges increased $2.6 million in 2002 primarily reflecting higher environmental remediation costs of $7.7 million partly offset by lower incentive compensation expense. The higher environmental costs are due to the identification of additional remediation actions required at a location that the Company has been addressing for the past fifteen years. The year 2001 included higher employee-related costs including a non-cash charge of $6.1 million resulting from the retirement of R.S. Evans as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and represents stock-based retirement costs that previously were being amortized to an anticipated retirement at age 65.

Corporate expense—asbestos charges represent the provision for estimated costs of asbestos-related claims, which are included in cost of sales in the consolidated statements of operations. During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company recorded a non-cash pre-tax charge of $107.9 million to increase its net estimated liability for asbestos-related costs to $120 million. This fourth quarter charge combined with asbestos charges incurred in the first nine months of 2002 of $7.4 million resulted in the annual asbestos provision of $115.3 million. The asbestos charge was made to reflect the increase in estimated costs of asbestos-related claims through 2007, net of anticipated insurance recoveries of $80 million. See “Application of Critical Accounting Policies” for further details.

Interest expense was down $4.3 million in 2002 compared with 2001 as a result of lower swap-adjusted interest cost and the reduction in debt level reflecting the continued strong generation of free cash flow.

Miscellaneous—net in 2002 included income of $2.9 million from the Company’s Ferguson business which Crane contributed into the Industrial Motion Control Holdings, LLC (“IMC”) joint venture in 2001, offset by asset disposal costs. The 2001 expense reflects the loss on the disposal of Crane Plumbing of $13.8 million and equity income of $0.9 million earned from IMC.

The effective tax rate on income improved to 32.0% from 34.8% reflecting the 2001 tax effect of non-deductible goodwill amortization which is no longer required in accordance with the requirements of SFAS 142 “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2002.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Cash Flow Operating activities in 2002 generated $197 million in cash flow. In addition, the disposal of non-core businesses and the sale of excess real estate generated $8 million of incremental cash during the year. The Company redeployed these resources by investing $82 million to expand its core businesses by making seven acquisitions and by investing $25 million in capital equipment while returning $34 million to shareholders through dividends ($24 million) and share repurchases ($10 million). The year 2002 represents the sixth consecutive year the Company has generated at least $150 million of cash from operations.

Short and Long-Term Financing Net debt decreased by $66 million to $217 million at December 31, 2002. The net debt to capital percentage was 25.1%, down from 30.3% at December 31, 2001. Interest coverage (income before taxes and the non-cash asbestos charge plus net interest expense, divided by net interest expense) was 10.6 times interest in 2002 as compared with 7.9 times in 2001.

As of December 31, 2002, the Company had domestic unsecured, uncommitted credit lines for $115 million, of which $99.6 million was unused and available. The Company and/or its subsidiaries had foreign credit lines for approximately $47 million, of which $44.4 million was unused and available. These credit lines are typically available for borrowings up to 364 days and are renewable at the option of the lender. Included in the above amounts is a contractually committed long-term line of credit with the Company’s Canadian subsidiary. This facility, which permits borrowings of up to $9.5 million, was unused and available at December 31, 2002.

In addition, at December 31, 2002, the Company had a $300 million contractually committed bank credit facility under which the Company can borrow, repay or, to the extent permitted by the agreement, prepay loans and re-borrow at any time prior to the stated maturity date of November 2003. Proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes or to provide financing for acquisitions. The agreement contains certain covenants including limitations on indebtedness and liens. A loan for $30 million was outstanding under this agreement at year-end. It is the Company’s intention to enter into a new multi-year revolving credit agreement with its current bank group or others on or before November 2003. Based on prevailing market conditions, the Company believes it has sufficient access to the bank credit market to renew this facility.

20

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

The Company also has an effective shelf registration, filed on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, allowing it to issue, in one or more offerings, up to $300 million in either senior or subordinated debt securities, all of which remains unissued. The Company may use the net proceeds from the sale of debt securities for general corporate purposes, which may include making additions to its working capital, repaying indebtedness, making acquisitions, or for other purposes that may be described in an offering prospectus. All debt securities that may be offered from time to time will be direct, unsecured obligations of the Company.

The Company’s ability to meet its short-term and long-term debt and other obligations will be dependent upon its future operating performance and the successful renegotiation of its credit facilities. The Company believes that funds generated by its operations and funds available under current or new credit facilities will be sufficient to finance short- and long-term capital requirements.

Credit Ratings As of December 31, 2002, the Company’s senior unsecured debt was rated BBB+ by Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) and Baa1 by Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”). Under prevailing market conditions, the Company believes that these ratings afford it adequate access to the public and private markets for debt. On January 24, 2003, after the Company announced an additional non-cash, after-tax charge for future asbestos-related expenses, S&P affirmed the Company’s BBB+ rating and stable outlook. On this same date, Moody’s issued a statement placing the Company’s Baa1 senior unsecured debt rating under review.

Contractual Obligations Under various agreements, the Company is obligated to make future cash payments in fixed amounts. These include payments under the Company’s long-term debt agreements and rent payments required under operating lease agreements. The following table summarizes the Company’s fixed cash obligations as of December 31, 2002 over the next five fiscal years.

In thousands	2003		2004		2005		2006		2007
Short-term debt	$	48,153	$	—	$	—	$	—	$	—
Long-term debt		400		102,059		300		100,310		170
Operating lease payments		10,396		8,064		5,945		4,756		2,583
TOTAL	$	58,949	$	110,123	$	6,245	$	105,066	$	2,753

Capital Structure

The following table sets forth the Company’s capitalization:

(dollars in thousands) December 31	2002			2001
Short-term debt	$	48,553		$	1,818
Long-term debt		205,318			302,368
Total debt		253,871			304,186
Less cash		36,589			21,163
Net debt		217,282			283,023
Common shareholders’ equity		649,062			651,295
Total capitalization	$	866,344		$	934,318
% of net debt to shareholders’ equity		33.5	%		43.5	%
% of net debt to total capitalization		25.1	%		30.3	%

Common shareholders’ equity was reduced in 2002 by $2.2 million, primarily the result of the Company’s net loss ($11.4 million), cash dividends and share repurchases ($33.6 million), partly offset by favorable currency impacts ($33.7 million) driven by the strength of the Euro and British Pound in 2002.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company is a party to a contractually committed off-balance sheet chattel paper financing facility that enables its Crane Merchandising Systems (“CMS”) business to offer various sales support financing programs to its customers. At December 31, 2002, $30.0 million was outstanding. Recourse to Crane for all uncollectible loans made to CMS’s customers by the banks under this agreement is limited to 20% of the outstanding balance per year.

The Company has no majority-owned subsidiaries that are not included in the consolidated financial statements nor does it have any interests in or relationships with any special purpose off-balance sheet financing entities.

The Company’s $21 million investment in the IMC joint venture is accounted for under the equity method of accounting. The Company has not guaranteed any of IMC’s debt or made commitments for any additional investment.

21

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s financial statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The Company’s significant accounting policies are more fully described in the Accounting Policies note to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain accounting policies require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. On an on-going basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the financial statements in the period in which they are determined to be necessary. The accounting policies described below are those that most frequently require management to make estimates and judgments and, therefore, are critical to understanding the Company’s results of operations. Senior management has discussed the development and selection of these accounting estimates and the related disclosures with the Audit Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.

Accounts Receivable    The Company continually monitors collections from customers, and in addition to providing an allowance for uncollectible accounts based upon a customer’s financial condition, it provides a provision for estimated credit losses when customer accounts exceed 90 days past due. The Company aggressively pursues collection efforts on these overdue accounts and upon collection reverses the write-off.

Inventories    The Company values inventory at the lower of cost or market and regularly reviews inventory values on hand and records a provision for excess and obsolete inventory primarily based on historical performance and the Company’s forecast of product demand over the next two years. As actual future demand or market conditions vary from those projected by management, adjustments to inventory valuations will be required.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets    The Company periodically reviews the carrying value of long-lived assets for continued appropriateness. These reviews are based upon projections of anticipated future undiscounted cash flows. While the Company believes these estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect valuations.

Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets    As of December 31, 2002, the Company had $417.9 million of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets. Effective January 1, 2002, Crane adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS 142”) “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.” Under SFAS 142, goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized. SFAS 142 also requires, at a minimum, an annual assessment of the carrying value of goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives. If the carrying value of goodwill or an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized. A discounted cash flow model was used to determine the fair value for purposes of testing goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets for impairment. An impairment charge of $28.1 million was recorded upon adoption of SFAS 142, and additional charges may be necessary in the future if circumstances change indicating a reduction in fair value of goodwill or indefinite lived intangible assets below carrying value. During 2002, no additional impairment charge was required.

Contingencies    The Company is subject to a number of proceedings, lawsuits and other claims (some of which involve substantial dollar amounts) that arise out of the conduct of normal business operations. Certain claims, which are also among the most significant claims the Company is facing, relate to activities conducted or alleged to have been conducted and to business activities that ceased decades ago. They relate principally to asbestos-related claims and environmental matters as set forth in the “Asbestos Liability” and “Other Contingencies” Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In general, a liability is recognized for any contingency that is probable and reasonably estimable based on management’s judgment. In estimating the net liability for a contingency, the Company records an asset for the amount considered probable of recovery from its insurance coverage.

For asbestos-related claims, the Company estimated new claims through 2007, beyond which the Company believes a reliable estimate cannot be made. The Company reviewed, among other things, the incidence of past and recent claims, historical and recent settlement results, the number of cases pending against it, litigation costs and asbestos litigation developments that may impact the exposure of the Company. Estimated settlement and defense costs for pending and future claims are adjusted for certain factors such as the nature of the claim and the venue in which the claim is brought. Counsel was retained to assist in management’s analysis of insurance coverage. Total asbestos charges, all of which are included in the Corporate segment for each of the past three years, were as follows: $115.3 million in 2002, $2.2 million in 2001 and none in 2000. Total cash payments for settlement and defense costs were $1.4 million in 2002, $820,000 in 2001 and $270,000 in 2000, reflecting the impact of payment terms and insurance reimbursements to date.

22

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

For environmental matters, the Company records a liability for estimated remediation costs when such conditions are probable or the Company has been notified by a state or government agency that remediation is required. Generally, third party specialists assist in the estimation of remediation costs. The environmental remediation liability recorded at December 31, 2002 is primarily for one site which has been in the process of remediation for the past fifteen years and is estimated to continue through 2007. Total environmental costs amounted to $7.7 million in 2002, and none in both 2001 and 2000.

Although it is impossible to predict the outcome of particular lawsuits or claims, the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements mentioned above provide a summary of the uncertainties inherent in the process, the significant contingencies currently pending against the Company and the expectations related to the financial outcome of such contingencies. Adjustments to the amounts accrued will be made as circumstances change.

Benefit Plans    The Company is required to make estimates and assumptions to determine benefit plan liabilities, which include investment returns, rates of salary increases, discount rates and health care cost trend rates. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed annually with the assistance of external actuarial professionals and adjusted as circumstances change. At December 31, 2002, plan assets were invested 64% in stocks, 28% in bonds and 8% in money market funds. The investment return assumption assumes a comparable asset mix. The assumed discount rate reflects the rate at which the pension benefits could be settled. At December 31, 2002, the weighted average rates used for the computation of benefit plan liabilities were: investment returns, 7.77%; rates of salary increases, 4.00%; and discount rate, 6.30%. Net periodic cost for 2003 will be based on the December 31, 2002 valuation. The defined benefit plan periodic cost (benefit) was $0.4 million in 2002, ($4.3) million in 2001 and ($3.6) million in 2000. At December 31, 2002, assuming no change in the other assumptions, a one percentage point change in investment returns would affect the net periodic cost by $4.2 million and a one percentage point change in the discount rate and rate of compensation would affect the net periodic cost by $0.7 million, as these amounts are offsetting.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risks

The Company’s cash flows and earnings are subject to fluctuations from changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. The Company manages its exposures to these market risks through internally established policies and procedures and, when deemed appropriate, through the use of interest-rate swap agreements and forward exchange contracts. Long-term debt outstanding of $205.3 million at December 31, 2002, was generally at fixed rates of interest ranging from 4.75% to 8.5%. The Company does not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.

Risk Factors

Throughout this Annual Report to Shareholders, particularly in the President’s Letter to Shareholders on pages 4-7 and in the sections of Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Operations on pages 13-23, the Company makes numerous statements about expectations of future performance and market trends and statements about plans and objectives and other matters, which because they are not historical fact may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Similar forward looking statements are made periodically in reports to the Securities and Exchange Commission, press releases, reports and documents and in written and oral presentations to investors, shareholders, analysts and others, regarding future results or expected developments. Because the Company wishes to take advantage of the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, readers are cautioned to consider, among others, the risk factors that will be described in the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2002 to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission before March 31, 2003, when evaluating such forward-looking statements about future results or developments.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Operations continues on page 41.

23

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

	(in thousands, except per share data)
For Years Ended December 31,	2002			2001			2000
Net sales	$	1,516,347		$	1,587,180		$	1,491,190
Operating costs and expenses:
Cost of sales		1,154,551			1,092,537			1,031,946
Selling, general and administrative		322,125			322,959			275,218
		1,476,676			1,415,496			1,307,164
Operating profit		39,671			171,684			184,026
Other income (expense):
Interest income		2,285			1,063			820
Interest expense		(16,900	)		(21,187	)		(21,564	)
Miscellaneous—net		(603	)		(15,743	)		27,078
		(15,218	)		(35,867	)		(6,334	)
Income before income taxes and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		24,453			135,817			190,360
Provision for income taxes		7,825			47,197			66,631
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		16,628			88,620			123,729
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(28,076	)		—			—
Net (loss) income	$	(11,448	)	$	88,620		$	123,729
Basic net (loss) income per share:
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.28		$	1.48		$	2.03
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(0.47	)		—			—
Net (loss) income	$	(0.19	)	$	1.48		$	2.03
Average basic shares outstanding		59,728		$	59,825			60,919
Diluted net (loss) income per share:
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.28		$	1.47		$	2.02
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(0.47	)		—			—
Net (loss) income	$	(0.19	)	$	1.47		$	2.02
Average diluted shares outstanding		59,728			60,355			61,399

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

24

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

	(in thousands, except per share data)
Balance at December 31,	2002			2001
ASSETS
Current assets:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	36,589		$	21,163
Accounts receivable		213,850			217,636
Inventories		214,689			244,190
Deferred tax assets		33,444			32,279
Other current assets		10,905			7,989
Total current assets		509,477			523,257
Net property, plant and equipment		273,248			275,793
Other assets		174,522			72,622
Intangible assets		46,093			41,970
Goodwill		410,356			378,473
	$	1,413,696		$	1,292,115
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities:
Current maturities of long-term debt	$	400		$	375
Loans payable		48,153			1,443
Accounts payable		91,072			84,707
Accrued liabilities		125,859			136,690
U.S. and foreign taxes on income		22,941			25,924
Total current liabilities		288,425			249,139
Long-term debt		205,318			302,368
Accrued pension and postretirement benefits		39,499			45,514
Deferred income taxes		8,972			20,888
Other liabilities		222,420			22,911
Preferred shares, par value $.01; 5,000,000 shares authorized		—			—
Common shareholders’ equity:
Common shares, par value $1.00;
authorized: 200,000,000 shares; issued: 72,426,139 shares; outstanding: 59,447,552 shares (59,689,874 in 2001) after deducting 12,978,587 shares in treasury (12,736,265 in 2001)		72,426			72,426
Capital surplus		106,421			103,754
Retained earnings		756,801			789,244
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(788	)		(34,461	)
Treasury stock		(285,798	)		(279,668	)
Total common shareholders’ equity		649,062			651,295
	$	1,413,696		$	1,292,115

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

25

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

	(in thousands)
For years ended December 31,	2002			2001			2000
Operating activities:
Net (loss) income	$	(11,448	)	$	88,620		$	123,729
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		28,076			—			—
Loss (gain) on sale of assets		—			13,799			(26,646	)
Income from joint venture		(2,917	)		(915	)		—
Depreciation and amortization		49,790			74,610			55,281
Asbestos-related charges		115,285			2,216			—
Deferred income taxes		(29,781	)		(2,019	)		(2,689	)
Cash provided from operating working capital		58,279			34,090			5,338
Other		(9,843	)		(12,839	)		(3,837	)
TOTAL PROVIDED FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES		197,441			197,562			151,176
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures		(25,496	)		(32,144	)		(29,977	)
Proceeds from disposition of capital assets		5,628			7,926			1,779
Joint venture investment		—			(12,000	)		—
Sale of equity investments		—			—			45,556
Payments for acquisitions, net of cash and liabilities assumed of $9,010 in 2002, $43,764 in 2001 and $909 in 2000		(82,225	)		(191,168	)		(11,921	)
Proceeds from divestitures		2,705			19,645			—
TOTAL (USED FOR) PROVIDED FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(99,388	)		(207,741	)		5,437
Financing activities:
Equity:
Dividends paid		(23,897	)		(23,918	)		(24,323	)
Reacquisition of shares—open market		(6,475	)		(28,434	)		(62,296	)
Reacquisition of shares—stock incentive program		(3,206	)		(2,279	)		(4,374	)
Stock options exercised		4,294			9,097			12,388
		(29,284	)		(45,534	)		(78,605	)
Debt:
Issuance of long-term debt		32,860			197,300			86,200
Repayments of long-term debt		(92,306	)		(109,728	)		(158,576	)
Net increase (decrease) in short-term debt		909			(21,441	)		2,393
		(58,537	)		66,131			(69,983	)
TOTAL (USED FOR) PROVIDED FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(87,821	)		20,597			(148,588	)
Effect of exchange rate on cash and cash equivalents		5,194			(181	)		(344	)
Increase in cash and cash equivalents		15,426			10,237			7,681
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		21,163			10,926			3,245
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year	$	36,589		$	21,163		$	10,926
Detail of cash provided from operating working capital
(Net of effects of acquisitions):
Accounts receivable	$	21,082		$	17,888		$	(9,810	)
Inventories		43,753			21,412			17,806
Other current assets		(2,672	)		791			(140	)
Accounts payable		(3,023	)		(17,869	)		8,300
Accrued liabilities		(10	)		14,497			(13,002	)
U.S. and foreign taxes on income		(851	)		(2,629	)		2,184
TOTAL	$	58,279		$	34,090		$	5,338
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Interest paid	$	17,084		$	21,133		$	21,596
Income taxes paid	$	38,916		$	34,933		$	59,117

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

26

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands, except share data)	Common Shares Issued at Par Value		Capital Surplus		Retained Earnings			Comprehensive Income		Accumulated Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income			Treasury Stock			Total Common Shareholders’ Equity
BALANCE JANUARY 1, 2000	$	72,426	$	98,289	$	623,421				$	(22,481	)	$	(203,545	)	$	568,110
Net income						123,729		123,729									123,729
Cash dividends						(24,323	)										(24,323	)
Reacquisition of 3,068,375 shares														(65,012	)		(65,012	)
Exercise of stock options 796,617 shares														12,388			12,388
Tax benefit – exercise of stock options				2,855													2,855
Restricted stock forfeited, 104,552 shares, net						(1,963	)							(406	)		(2,369	)
Currency translation adjustment								(8,615	)		(8,615	)					(8,615	)
Comprehensive income								115,114
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2000	$	72,426	$	101,144	$	720,864				$	(31,096	)	$	(256,575	)	$	606,763
Net income						88,620		88,620									88,620
Cash dividends						(23,918	)										(23,918	)
Reacquisition of 1,155,271 shares														(30,713	)		(30,713	)
Exercise of stock options 542,113 shares														9,097			9,097
Tax benefit – exercise of stock options				2,610													2,610
Restricted stock forfeited, 123,129 shares, net						3,678								(1,477	)		2,201
Currency translation adjustment								(3,365	)		(3,365	)					(3,365	)
Comprehensive income								85,255
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2001	$	72,426	$	103,754	$	789,244				$	(34,461	)	$	(279,668	)	$	651,295
Net income						(11,448	)	(11,448	)								(11,448	)
Cash dividends						(23,897	)										(23,897	)
Reacquisition of 486,905 shares														(10,289	)		(10,289	)
Exercise of stock options, 251,691 shares														4,294			4,294
Tax benefit – exercise of stock options				2,667													2,667
Restricted stock forfeited, 7,108 shares, net						2,902								(135	)		2,767
Currency translation adjustment								33,673			33,673						33,673
Comprehensive income								22,225
BALANCE DECEMBER 31, 2002	$	72,426	$	106,421	$	756,801				$	(788	)	$	(285,798	)	$	649,062

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

27

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Accounting Policies

Consolidation    The consolidated financial statements include all controlled subsidiaries. Investments in affiliates over which the Company exercises significant influence but which it does not control (generally 20% to 50% ownership) are accounted for under the equity method. All intercompany items have been eliminated. Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the 2002 presentation.

Use of Estimates    The Company’s financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expense during the reporting period. Actual results may differ from those estimated. Estimates and assumptions are reviewed periodically, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the financial statements in the period in which they are determined to be necessary. Estimates are used when accounting for such items as inventory reserves, allowance for doubtful accounts, depreciation and amortization, valuation of long-lived assets, employee benefit plans, taxes and contingencies.

Currency Translation    Assets and liabilities of subsidiaries that prepare financial statements in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are translated at the rate of exchange in effect on the balance sheet date; results of operations are translated at the average rates of exchange prevailing during the year. The related translation adjustments are included in accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income in a separate component of common shareholders’ equity.

Revenue Recognition    Sales revenue is recorded when a product is shipped, title (risk of loss) passes to the customer and collection of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

Income Taxes    Income tax expense is based on reported earnings before income taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences between financial and tax reporting . Significant factors considered by the Company in estimating the probability of the realization of deferred taxes include expectations of future earnings and taxable income, as well as application of tax laws in the jurisdictions in which the Company operates.

Net Income (Loss) Per Share    The Company’s basic earnings per share calculations are based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the year. For the year ended 2002, 318,000 shares attributable to the exercise of outstanding options were excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share because the effect was anti-dilutive.

(in thousands, except per share data) For year ended December 31,	2002			2001		2000
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	16,628		$	88,620	$	123,729
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(28,076	)		—		—
Net (loss) income	$	(11,448	)	$	88,620	$	123,729
Average basic shares outstanding		59,728			59,825		60,919
Effect of dilutive stock options		—			530		480
Average diluted shares outstanding		59,728			60,355		61,399
Basic net income per share:
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.28		$	1.48	$	2.03
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(0.47	)		—		—
Net (loss) income	$	(0.19	)	$	1.48	$	2.03
Diluted net income per share:
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle	$	0.28		$	1.47	$	2.02
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(0.47	)		—		—
Net (loss) income	$	(0.19	)	$	1.47	$	2.02

Cash and Cash Equivalents    Marketable securities with original maturities of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable    Receivables are carried at net realizable value.

A summary of the allowance for doubtful accounts at December 31, follows:

(in thousands)	2002			2001			2000
Balance at beginning of year	$	8,172		$	8,097		$	7,073
Provisions		7,550			9,200			7,093
Deductions		(9,020	)		(9,125	)		(6,069	)
Balance at end of year	$	6,702		$	8,172		$	8,097

Concentrations of credit risk with respect to accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of customers and relatively small account balances within the majority of the Company’s customer base, and their dispersion across different businesses. The Company periodically evaluates the financial strength of its customers and believes that its credit risk exposure is limited.

28

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Inventories    Inventories consist of the following:

(in thousands) December 31,	2002		2001
Finished goods	$	62,254	$	68,421
Finished parts and subassemblies		55,037		64,965
Work in process		27,279		28,990
Raw materials		70,119		81,814
Total inventories	$	214,689	$	244,190

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market. Domestic locations are principally on the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method of inventory valuation. The reduction of inventory quantities has resulted in a liquidation of LIFO inventories acquired at lower costs prevailing in prior years. Liquidations have reduced cost of sales by $2.8 million in 2002, $5.0 million in 2001 and $1.3 million in 2000. Replacement cost would have been higher by $15.2 million and $18.9 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

Property, plant and equipment    Property, Plant and Equipment consist of the following:

(in thousands) December 31,	2002		2001
Land	$	47,471	$	45,385
Buildings and improvements		144,246		134,799
Machinery and equipment		487,043		456,088
Gross property, plant and equipment		678,760		636,272
Less accumulated depreciation		405,512		360,479
Net property, plant and equipment	$	273,248	$	275,793

Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation is provided by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets, which range from three to twenty-five years.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets    Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142 (“SFAS 142”) “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”. Under SFAS 142, goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives are no longer amortized. SFAS 142 also requires, at a minimum, an annual assessment of the carrying value of goodwill and intangibles with indefinite useful lives. If the carrying value of goodwill or an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss shall be recognized. A discounted cash flow model was used to determine the fair value of the Company’s reporting units for purposes of testing goodwill for impairment.

The effects of adopting the new standard on net income and diluted earnings per share for the years ended December 31, are as follows:

(In thousands, except per share data)	2002			2001		2000
Net (loss) income	$	(11,448	)	$	88,620	$	123,729
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(28,076	)		—		—
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		16,628			88,620		123,729
Goodwill amortization, net of tax		—			16,924		16,088
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and goodwill amortization	$	16,628		$	105,544	$	139,817
Basic net (loss) income per share:
Net (loss) income	$	(0.19	)	$	1.48	$	2.03
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(0.47	)		—		—
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		0.28			1.48		2.03
Goodwill amortization, net of tax		—			.28		.26
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and goodwill amortization	$	0.28		$	1.76	$	2.29
Diluted net (loss) income per share:
Net (loss) income	$	(0.19	)	$	1.47	$	2.02
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(0.47	)		—		—
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		0.28			1.47		2.02
Goodwill amortization, net of tax		—			.28		.26
Income before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle and goodwill amortization	$	0.28		$	1.75	$	2.28

The after-tax cumulative effect adjustment recognized upon adoption of SFAS 142 was $28,076. The reporting segments (units) in which the impairment loss was recognized are as follows:

(in thousands)
Merchandising Systems (Streamware)	$	7,751
Fluid Handling (Crane Environmental)		4,070
Controls (Barksdale)		16,255
Total	$	28,076

Changes to goodwill and intangible assets during the year ended December 31, 2002, including the effects of adopting the new accounting standard, are as follows:

(in thousands)	Goodwill			Intangible Assets
Balance at December 31, 2001, net of accumulated amortization	$	378,473		$	41,970
Write-off of goodwill recognized in cumulative effect adjustment		(30,267	)		—
Additions during the year		55,628			3,736
Translation and other adjustments		6,522			4,343
Amortization expense		—			(3,956	)
Balance at December 31, 2002, net of accumulated amortization	$	410,356		$	46,093

29

Goodwill increased $55.6 million, of which $33.1 million is tax deductible, during the year ended December 31, 2002 primarily due to the acquisition of Lasco Composites LP in May 2002, Corva Corporation in July 2002 and General Technology Corporation and Qualis Incorporated in November 2002. This amount is included in the following segments: Aerospace, $16.9 million; Engineered Materials, $31.9 million; and Fluid Handling, $6.8 million.

Goodwill, for acquisitions prior to January 1, 2002, was being amortized on a straight-line basis ranging from fifteen to forty years. The accumulated amortization was $96.0 million at December 31, 2001. Goodwill amortization was $18.1 million and $16.9 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively.

Intangible assets totaled $46.1 million (net of accumulated amortization of $30.1 million) and $42.0 million (net of accumulated amortization of $24.2 million) at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. Of this amount at December 31, 2002, $7.5 million represent intangibles with indefinite useful lives, consisting of trade names which are not being amortized under SFAS 142.

A summary of the intangible assets, at December 31, are as follows:

	2002				2001
(in thousands)	Gross Asset		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Asset		Accumulated Amortization
Intellectual rights	$	67,539	$	26,354	$	57,851	$	21,029
Drawings		7,025		3,414		7,025		3,019
Other		1,579		282		1,260		118
	$	76,143	$	30,050	$	66,136	$	24,166

Amortization expense for these intangible assets is expected to be approximately $4.0 million each year between 2003 and 2007.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets    The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets when events and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable. The carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when the anticipated undiscounted cash flow from such asset is separately identifiable and is less than its carrying value. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived asset. Fair market value is determined primarily using the anticipated cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the risk involved.

Stock-Based Compensation Plans    The Company records compensation expense for its stock-based employee compensation plans in accordance with the intrinsic-value method prescribed by APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Intrinsic value is the amount by which the market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock option or award on the measurement date, generally the date of grant.

In December 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 148, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transitions and Disclosure” (“SFAS No. 148”), which amends FASB Statement No. 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” The Company adopted the disclosure provisions of SFAS No. 148 at December 31, 2002 (see page 37 for disclosure).

Financial Instruments    The Company periodically enters into interest-rate swap agreements to moderate its exposure to interest rate changes and to lower the overall cost of borrowings. Interest-rate swaps are agreements to exchange fixed and variable rate payments based on the notional principal amounts. The changes in the fair value of a derivative and the hedged item are recognized in earnings if the derivative is designated as an effective fair-value hedge. The Company does not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes. The Company periodically uses option contracts and forward foreign exchange contracts as economic hedges of anticipated transactions and firm purchase and sale commitments. These contracts are marked to market on a current basis and the respective gains and losses are recognized in other income (expense).

Recently Issued Accounting Standards    In June 2002, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 (“SFAS 146”), “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” SFAS 146 requires companies to recognize costs associated with exit or disposal activities when they are incurred rather than at the date of a commitment to an exit or disposal plan. SFAS 146 nullifies Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 94-3, “Liability Recognition for Certain Employee Termination Benefits and Other Costs to Exit an Activity (including Certain Costs Incurred in a Restructuring)” and will be applied prospectively to exit or disposal activities initiated after December 31, 2002. The Company will implement Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 146 on January 1, 2003.

30

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Miscellaneous—Net

(in thousands) for years ended December 31,	2002			2001			2000
(Loss) gain on sale of assets (a)	$	(1,489	)	$	(13,799	)	$	26,646
Foreign exchange (loss) gain		—			(1,224	)		2,597
Equity joint venture income		2,917			915			—
Other		(2,031	)		(1,635	)		(2,165	)
	$	(603	)	$	(15,743	)	$	27,078
(a)  Reflects loss on sale of Crane Plumbing in 2001 and gain on sale of investment in Powec AS and related telecommunications        power supply product line in 2000.
Income Taxes
Income (loss) before taxes is as follows:
(in thousands) for years ended December 31,	2002			2001			2000
U.S. operations	$	(10,443	)	$	105,400		$	174,879
Non-U.S. operations		34,896			30,417			15,481
	$	24,453		$	135,817		$	190,360
The provision for income taxes consists of:
(in thousands) for years ended December 31,	2002			2001			2000
Current:
U.S. federal tax	$	31,048		$	31,581		$	59,369
State and local tax		352			2,600			4,374
Non-U.S. tax		6,206			15,035			5,577
		37,606			49,216			69,320
Deferred:
U.S. federal tax		(35,011	)		1,176			(5,656	)
State and local tax		(31	)		391			(127	)
Non-U.S. tax		5,261			(3,586	)		3,094
		(29,781	)		(2,019	)		(2,689	)
Provision for income taxes	$	7,825		$	47,197		$	66,631
Reconciliation of the statutory U.S. federal rate to the effective tax rate is as follows:
(in thousands) for years ended December 31,	2002			2001			2000
Statutory U.S. federal tax at 35%	$	8,559		$	47,536		$	66,631
Increase (reduction) from:
Non-U.S. taxes		(1,019	)		28			3,253
State and local taxes		(2,321	)		1,944			2,761
Non-deductible goodwill		—			4,803			4,697
Federal benefit on export sales		(2,762	)		(6,098	)		(6,227	)
Valuation allowance on state deferred tax assets		3,892			—			—
Foreign dividends net of credits		2,874			1,707			(314	)
General business tax credit		(2,894	)		(2,785	)		(500	)
Other		1,496			62			(3,670	)
Provision for income taxes	$	7,825		$	47,197		$	66,631
Effective tax rate		32.0	%		34.8	%		35.0	%

At December 31, 2002, the Company had unremitted earnings of foreign subsidiaries of $126.2 million. Because these earnings, which reflect full provision for non-U.S. income taxes, are indefinitely reinvested in non-U.S. operations, or can be remitted substantially free of additional tax, no provision has been made for taxes that might be payable upon remittance of such earnings.

Tax benefits of $2.7 million in 2002, $2.6 million in 2001 and $2.9 million in 2000 associated with the exercise of employee stock options and other employee stock programs were allocated to stockholders’ equity.

The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities included on the balance sheet at December 31 are as follows:

(in thousands) December 31,	2002			2001
Deferred tax assets:
Postretirement benefits		11,044		$	11,219
Inventories		12,630			14,274
Insurance		7,209			6,199
Asbestos-related liabilities		46,680			—
Environmental		4,388			4,357
Tax loss and credit carryforwards		19,303			14,699
Deferred compensation		3,667			3,072
Warranty		3,819			2,575
Compensated absences		5,099			5,009
Other		9,364			13,314
Total		123,203			74,718
Less valuation allowance on tax loss, credit carryforwards and state deferred tax asset		20,659			7,044
Total deferred tax assets, net		102,544			67,674
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation		(30,878	)		(29,932	)
Intangibles		(12,196	)		(11,514	)
Pension		(9,938	)		(8,232	)
Defined contribution plan		(3,348	)		(3,537	)
Total deferred liabilities		(56,360	)		(53,215	)
Net deferred asset	$	46,184		$	14,459
Balance sheet classification:
Deferred tax assets		33,444			32,279
Other assets		23,581			3,784
Accrued liabilities		(1,869	)		(716	)
Deferred income taxes		(8,972	)		(20,888	)
Net deferred tax asset		46,184		$	14,459

The Company considers it unlikely that a portion of tax benefit related to various state deferred tax assets will be realized. Accordingly, a $3.9 million valuation allowance has been established against these state deferred tax assets.

As of December 31, 2002, the Company had net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards that will expire, if unused, as follows:

(in thousands) year of expiration NOL	Non-U.S. National NOL		U.S State NOL		U.S. State Credit		U.S. Federal Credit		Total
2003-2006	$	1,441	$	21,454	$	170	$	—	$	23,065
After 2006		2,891		145,321		89		5,339		153,640
Indefinite		10,806		—		1,904		—		12,710
TOTAL	$	15,138	$	166,775	$	2,163	$	5,339	$	189,415
Deferred tax asset on tax carryforwards	$	4,680	$	7,878	$	1,406	$	5,339	$	19,303

Of the total $19.3 million deferred tax asset for tax carryforwards at December 31, 2002, $16.8 million has been offset by the valuation allowance because of the uncertainty of ultimately realizing these future benefits.

The Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) has completed its examination of the Company’s income tax returns for all years through 1994. In 2002, the IRS commenced its examination of the Company’s income tax returns for the years 1995-1999 and years 2000 and 2001. The Company believes that adequate accruals have been provided for all open years.

31

Accrued Liabilities

(in thousands) December 31,	2002		2001
Employee-related expenses	$	51,955	$	64,074
Insurance		11,345		8,166
Warranty		12,448		11,291
Professional fees		7,189		7,615
Taxes other than income		6,367		6,026
Other		36,555		39,518
	$	125,859	$	136,690

Warranty Liability

The Company accrues warranty liabilities when it is probable that an asset has been impaired or a liability has been incurred at the date of the financial statements and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.

A summary of the warranty liabilities at December 31, follows:

(in thousands) December 31,	2002			2001			2000
Balance at beginning of year	$	11,291		$	10,899		$	13,473
Add: provisions		8,419			7,092			6,371
Less: payments/deductions		(7,262	)		(6,700	)		(8,945	)
Balance at end of year	$	12,448		$	11,291		$	10,899

Other Liabilities

(in thousands) December 31,	2002		2001
Asbestos-related liabilities	$	198,000	$	2,400
Environmental		6,239		5,652
Insurance		3,346		3,346
Product liability		5,100		5,100
Minority interest		5,311		1,884
Other		4,424		4,529
	$	222,420	$	22,911

Research and Development

Research and development costs are expensed when incurred. These costs were approximately $46.0 million, $50.9 million and $48.3 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. Funds received from customer-sponsored research and development projects were approximately $5.1 million, $4.7 million and $6.7 million received in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively, and were recorded in net sales.

Pension and Postretirement Benefits

The Company and most of its subsidiaries have defined benefit pension plans for their employees. The plans generally provide benefit payments using a formula based on length of service and final average compensation, except for some hourly employees for whom the benefits are a fixed amount per year of service. The Company’s policy is to fund at least the minimum amount required by the applicable governmental regulations.

Postretirement health care and life insurance benefits are provided for certain U.S. and non-U.S. employees hired before January 1, 1990, who meet minimum age and service requirements. The Company does not pre-fund these benefits and has the right to modify or terminate the plan.

The following table sets forth the amounts recognized in the Company’s balance sheet at December 31, for Company-sponsored defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit plans:

	Pension Benefits						Postretirement Benefits
(in thousands) December 31,	2002			2001			2002			2001
Change in benefit obligation:
Benefit obligation at beginning of year	$	407,602		$	315,435		$	20,688		$	18,980
Service cost		12,547			9,201			172			220
Interest cost		25,498			21,390			1,234			1,548
Plan participants’ contributions		1,377			815			1,074			1,094
Amendments		825			390			—			—
Actuarial (gain) loss		(520	)		11,003			(1,630	)		2,789
Benefits paid		(21,189	)		(16,634	)		(3,016	)		(3,283	)
Foreign currency exchange rate loss (gain)		8,598			(4,589	)		—			—
Acquisition/divestitures/curtailment		(7,652	)		70,591			184			(660	)
Benefit obligation at end of year		427,086			407,602			18,706			20,688
Change in plan assets:
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year		487,286			434,825
Actual return on plan assets		(46,425	)		(4,983	)
Foreign currency exchange rate gain (loss)		10,980			(7,119	)
Employer contributions		215			196
Plan participants’contributions		1,377			815
Benefits paid		(21,189	)		(16,634	)
Acquisition/divestitures		(7,652	)		80,186
Fair value of plan assets at end of year		424,592			487,286
Funded status		(2,494	)		79,684			(18,706	)		(20,688	)
Unrecognized actuarial loss (gain)		24,951			(55,937	)		(7,172	)		(6,333	)
Unrecognized prior service cost		3,980			2,265			(507	)		(673	)
Unrecognized transition asset		(719	)		(811	)		—			—
Prepaid benefit/(accrued cost)	$	25,718		$	25,201		$	(26,385	)	$	(27,694	)

	Pension Benefits
(in thousands) December 31,	2002			2001
Balance sheet classification:
Other assets	$	39,061		$	43,338
Accrued liabilities		(1,604	)		(1,702	)
Accrued pension liabilities and postretirement benefits		(11,739	)		(16,435	)
	$	25,718		$	25,201

32

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Dollars in thousands)	Pension Benefits									Postretirement Benefits
December 31,	2002			2001			2000			2002			2001			2000
Weighted average assumptions as of December 31:
Discount rate		6.30	%		6.72	%		6.98	%		6.75	%		7.25	%		7.75	%
Expected rate of return on plan assets		7.77	%		8.05	%		7.88	%		—			—			—
Rate of compensation increase		4.00	%		4.29	%		4.59	%		—			—			—
Components of net periodic benefit cost:
Service cost	$	12,667		$	9,201		$	9,503		$	172		$	220		$	165
Interest cost		25,498			21,390			20,724			1,234			1,548			1,331
Expected rate of return on plan assets		(35,478	)		(33,693	)		(30,980	)		—			—			—
Amortization of prior service cost		(625	)		(62	)		(872	)		(91	)		(95	)		(95	)
Recognized net actuarial gain		(1,615	)		(1,145	)		(2,003	)		(675	)		(550	)		(786	)
Net periodic cost (benefit)	$	447		$	(4,309	)	$	(3,628	)	$	640		$	1,123		$	615

The projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation, and fair value of plan assets for pension plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets were $18.2 million, $15.6 million, and $8.2 million, and $8.8 million, $8.5 million and $7.9 million, as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

At December 31, 2002, substantially all plan assets were invested in listed stocks, bonds and money market funds, approximately 64%, 28% and 8%, respectively. These investments included common stock of the Company, which represents 3% of plan assets.

The Company participates in several multi-employer pension plans which provide benefits to certain employees under collective bargaining agreements. Contributions to these plans were approximately $1.2 million in 2002 and $1.1 million in 2001 and 2000, respectively.

The Company’s subsidiaries ELDEC Corporation and Interpoint Corporation have a money purchase plan to provide retirement benefits for all eligible employees. The annual contribution is 5% of each eligible participant’s gross compensation. The contributions were $2.0 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000.

The Company and its subsidiaries sponsor savings and investment plans that are available to eligible employees of the Company and its subsidiaries. The Company made contributions to the plans of approximately $4.2 million in 2002, $4.8 million in 2001 and $5.4 million in 2000.

For the purpose of estimating the postretirement liability, the cost of covered benefits was assumed to increase 9.0% for 2003, and then change gradually to a 4.75% increase by 2009 and remain at that level thereafter. In 2002, the cost of covered benefits was assumed to increase 8.5% for 2002, and then to change gradually to a 5.00% increase by 2007 and remain at that level thereafter.

	1 Percentage		1 Percentage
(in thousands)	Point Increase		Point Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost components	$	101	$	(93	)
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation		1,127		(1,065	)

Short-Term Financing

The weighted average interest rate for loans payable, consisting of short-term borrowings of $48.2 million and $1.4 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, was 2.2% and 5.6%, respectively.

As of December 31, 2002, the Company had domestic unsecured, uncommitted credit lines for $115 million, of which $99.6 million was unused and available. The Company and/or its subsidiaries had foreign credit lines for approximately $47 million, of which $44.4 million was unused and available. These credit lines are typically available for borrowings up to 364 days and are renewable at the option of the lender. Included in these amounts is a contractually committed long-term line of credit with the Company’s Canadian subsidiary. This facility, which permits borrowings of up to $9.5 million, was unused and available at December 31, 2002.

In addition, at December 31, 2002, the Company had a $300 million contractually committed bank credit facility under which the Company can borrow, repay or, to the extent permitted by the agreement, prepay loans and re-borrow at any time prior to the stated maturity date of November 2003. Proceeds may be used for general corporate purposes or to provide financing for acquisitions. The agreement contains certain covenants including limitations on indebtedness and liens. Borrowings of $30 million were outstanding under this agreement at year-end.

Long-Term Financing

(in thousands) December 31,	2002			2001
Crane Co.
8.50% notes due 2004	$	100,000			100,000
Original issue discount		(102	)		(186	)
Deferred financing costs		(86	)		(154	)
Fair value adjustment of interest-rate swap		1,764			—
		101,576			99,660
6.75% notes due 2006		100,000			100,000
Original issue discount		(139	)		(177	)
Deferred financing costs		(406	)		(555	)
		99,455			99,268
Credit facility – 2.28% average rate		—			101,600
Deferred financing costs		(48	)		(60	)
		(48	)		101,540
Total Crane Co.		200,983			300,468
Subsidiaries
Industrial revenue bonds		4,135			775
Various loans		600			1,500
Total subsidiaries		4,735			2,275
Total long-term debt		205,718			302,743
Less current portion		400			375
Long-term debt, net of current portion	$	205,318		$	302,368

At December 31, 2002, the principal amounts of long-term debt repayments required for the next five years are $0.4 million in 2003, $102.1 million in 2004, $0.3 million in 2005, $100.3 in 2006 and $0.2 million in 2007.

The Company has an effective shelf registration, filed on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission, allowing it to issue, in one or more offerings, up to $300 million in either senior or subordinated debt securities, all of which remains unissued. The Company may use the net proceeds from the sale of debt securities for general corporate purposes, which may include making additions to its working capital, repaying indebtedness, making acquisitions, or for other purposes that may be described in an offering prospectus. All debt securities that may be offered from time to time will be direct, unsecured obligations of the Company.

33

In February 2002, the Company entered into a two-year interest-rate swap agreement with JPMorgan Chase Bank which converted $100 million of 8.5% fixed rate debt to LIBOR plus 4.985%. In October 2002, the Company closed this position. The gain of $2.2 million, included in the carrying value of debt, is being amortized as a reduction of interest expense over the remaining life of the Company’s outstanding 8.5% notes due March 15, 2004.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The carrying value of investments, short-term debt, accounts receivable and accounts payable approximates fair value. Long-term debt rates currently available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities are used to estimate the fair value for debt issues that are not quoted on an exchange. The estimated fair value of long-term debt was $222.5 million and $313.5 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.

The Company is a party to a contractually committed off-balance sheet chattel paper financing facility that enables its Crane Merchandising Systems operation to offer various sales support financing programs to its customers. At December 31, 2002, $30.0 million was outstanding. Recourse to the Company for all uncollectible loans made to CMS’s customers by the banks under this agreement is limited to 20% of the outstanding balance per year.

Leases

The Company leases certain facilities, vehicles and equipment. Future minimum payments, by year and in the aggregate, under leases with initial or remaining terms of one year or more consisted of the following at December 31, 2002:

(in thousands) December 31,	Capital Leases			Operating Leases		Minimum Sublease Income		Net
2003	$	141		$	10,663	$	267	$	10,537
2004		152			8,310		246		8,216
2005		157			6,068		123		6,102
2006		168			4,833		77		4,924
2007		178			2,655		72		2,761
Thereafter		3,116			7,522		126		10,512
Total minimum lease payments	$	3,912		$	40,051	$	911	$	43,052
Interest		(177	)
Present Value	$	3,735

The weighted average interest rate for capital leases is 4.75%.

Rental expense was $13.9 million, $13.7 million and $10.6 million for 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.

The cost of assets capitalized under leases at December 31, 2002 is as follows:

(in thousands)
Building and improvements	$	4,967
Less accumulated depreciation		(388	)
	$	4,579

Asbestos Liability

As of December 31, 2002, the Company was a defendant, among a number of defendants, typically over 50 and frequently in the hundreds, in cases filed in various state and federal courts alleging injury or death as a result of exposure to asbestos. Activity related to asbestos claims was as follows:

	2002		2001		2000
Beginning claims	16,180		5,460		2,434
New claims	49,429		10,985		3,123
Settlements	(11,299	)	(66	)	(28	)
Dismissals	(272	)	(199	)	(69	)
Ending claims	54,038		16,180		5,460

Of the 54,038 pending claims as of December 31, 2002, approximately 20,000 were filed in New York by one firm and approximately 25,000 were filed by several firms in Mississippi. These filings typically do not identify any of the Company’s products as a source of asbestos exposure, and based on the Company’s past experience, it is expected that a substantial majority of such New York claims will be dismissed against the Company for lack of product identification.

The gross settlement costs (before insurance recoveries and tax effects) for the Company totaled $7.3 million in 2002, including settlement of 9,040 claims brought by one group of plaintiff attorneys in Mississippi payable within the next year, $760,000 in 2001 and $480,000 in 2000. Total gross legal costs (before insurance recoveries and tax effects) incurred in connection with the claims were $4.8 million in 2002, $2.3 million in 2001 and $1.3 million in 2000. Costs per claim vary depending on a number of factors, including the nature of the alleged exposure, the injury alleged and the jurisdiction where the claim was filed. Total pre-tax cash payments by the Company for settlement and defense costs were $1.4 million in 2002, $820,000 in 2001 and $270,000 in 2000 reflecting the impact of payment terms and insurance recoveries to date.

It is the Company’s accounting practice to conduct a detailed analysis of its asbestos-related liabilities quarterly or sooner if circumstances change significantly. The liability recorded for asbestos claims constitutes management’s best estimate, based on the Company’s experience of claims filed and defense and settlement costs for pending and reasonably anticipated future claims through 2007. For claims that will be filed beyond 2007, management believes that the level of uncertainty is too great to provide for reasonable estimation of the number of future claims, the nature of such claims, or the cost to resolve them and, accordingly, no accrual has been recorded for any costs which may be incurred beyond 2007. A long-term liability is recorded to cover the estimated cost of asbestos claims through 2007 and an asset is recorded representing the probable insurance reimbursement (approximately 40 percent of defense and settlement costs).

34

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

During the fourth quarter of 2002, the Company updated its evaluation of potential defense and settlement costs and the insurance coverage estimated to be available to cover these costs. The Company reviewed, among other things, the incidence of past and recent claims, historical and recent settlement results, the number of cases pending against it, litigation costs and asbestos litigation developments that may impact the exposure of the Company. The Company recently experienced a significant increase in the number of claims and defense and settlement costs involving asbestos-related claims. As a result, based on this historical experience, management’s estimate of the future number of claims and claim costs has changed resulting in a $108 million asbestos-related claims provision after insurance recoveries ($73 million net of tax) during the fourth quarter of 2002 bringing the total provision for 2002 to $115 million ($78 million net of tax). The Company’s December 31, 2002 estimated liability for asbestos-related claims before consideration of insurance recoveries was determined to be $200 million, or $120 million after insurance recoveries. As the net amount accrued at September 30, 2002 was $12 million, the additional charge of $108 million was required in the fourth quarter of 2002. Estimation of the Company’s ultimate exposure for asbestos-related claims is subject to significant uncertainties, as there are multiple variables that can affect the timing, severity and quantity of claims. The Company cautions that its liability is based on assumptions with respect to future new claims, defense and settlement costs based on historical experience rates during the last few years that may not prove reliable as predictors.

The Company receives reimbursement of settlement and defense costs from its primary insurers up to the agreed available limits of the applicable policies. The Company has substantial excess coverage policies that are expected to respond to asbestos claims as settlements and other payments exhaust the primary policies, but there is no cost sharing or allocation agreement yet in place with the excess insurers. The same factors that affect developing estimates of probable defense and settlement costs for asbestos-related liabilities also affect estimates of the probable insurance reimbursement, as do a number of additional factors. These additional factors include the financial viability of the insurance companies, the method in which losses will be allocated to the various insurance policies and the years covered by those policies, how legal and defense costs will be covered by the insurance policies and interpretation of the effect on coverage of various policy terms and limits and their interrelationships.

The Company determined it is probable that approximately 40%, or $80 million, of the estimated $200 million gross liability at December 31, 2002 will be paid by the Company’s insurers. This determination was made after considering the terms of the available insurance coverage, the financial viability of the insurance companies, the status of negotiations with its insurers and consulting with legal counsel. This insurance receivable has been recorded in other long-term assets as of December 31, 2002.

Since many uncertainties exist surrounding asbestos litigation, the Company will continue to evaluate its asbestos-related estimated liability and corresponding estimated insurance reimbursement as well as the underlying assumptions used to derive these amounts. These uncertainties may result in the Company incurring future charges to operations to adjust the carrying value of recorded liabilities and assets, particularly if escalation in the number of claims and defense and settlement costs occurs; however, the Company is currently unable to estimate such future changes. Although the resolution of these claims is anticipated to take many years, amounts recorded for the liability under generally accepted accounting principles are not discounted, and the effect on results of operations, cash flow and financial position in any given period from a revision to these estimates could be material.

Other Contingencies

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to proceedings, lawsuits and other claims including proceedings under laws and regulations related to environmental, warranty and other matters. Such matters are subject to many uncertainties and outcomes that are not predictable with assurance. However, the Company believes that after final disposition, any monetary liability or financial impact beyond that provided for at December 31, 2002 will not have a material effect on the Company’s results of operations, cash flow or financial position.

The Company has established insurance programs to cover product and general liability losses. These programs have deductible amounts of $5 million per claim and $10 million aggregate per policy year before coverage begins, with the exception of aircraft products, and non-U.S. claims which have first-dollar coverage. The Company does not deem its deductible exposure to be material.

The Company continues to be involved in various remediation actions to clean up hazardous wastes as required by federal and state laws. Estimated future environmental remediation cost was $11.1 million at December 31, 2002 which was fully accrued. In certain of these actions, the Company is one of several potentially responsible parties (“PRPs”). As a PRP, the Company could be liable for all clean-up costs despite the involvement of other PRPs. Given the financial stability of the other PRPs, the Company believes this is unlikely, and the accrual represents management’s best estimate, based on current facts and circumstances, with respect to the ultimate liability that will be apportioned to the Company. The Company spent $2.8 million on environmental costs in 2002 and expects to pay remediation costs of approximately $4.8 million in 2003. The annual level of future remediation expenditures is difficult to estimate because of the many uncertainties relating to conditions of individual sites as well as uncertainties about the status of environmental laws and regulations and developments in remedial technology. In addition, the Company is a minor or de minimis PRP at certain third-party environmental remediation sites where remediation obligations are joint and several, and the Company, as part of its estimate of potential liability, periodically reviews whether the major PRPs have the ability to fulfill their portion of such remediation obligations. The Company is not aware of any significant additional liability that would result from the inability of other PRPs to fulfill their obligations. Overall, the Company’s liability for the required remedial actions being implemented or engineered is not expected to be material.

35

Acquisitions, Divestitures and Investments

During 2002, the Company completed seven acquisitions at a total cost of $82.2 million. Preliminary estimates of goodwill for the 2002 acquisitions amounted to $55.6 million. Final purchase price allocations will be completed during 2003.

In May 2002, the Company acquired the Lasco Composites business from Tomkins Industries, Inc. Lasco is a manufacturer of fiberglass reinforced plastic panels with annual sales of approximately $40 million. This acquisition will further expand Crane’s product offerings in the transportation, building products and recreational vehicle markets and will provide an entry into the industrial market, where the Company’s Kemlite business currently has a small presence. The total purchase price was approximately $44 million in an all-cash transaction. The resulting goodwill will be deductible for tax purposes.

During July 2002, Crane acquired the Corva Corporation, which was a privately held company. Corva is a distributor of valves and actuators with annual sales of approximately $12 million.

In November 2002, the Company acquired all of the outstanding shares of General Technology Corporation from an employee stock ownership plan trust for a purchase price of $25 million in cash and assumed debt. General Technology provides high-reliability customized contract manufacturing services and products focused on military and defense applications. Based in Albuquerque, New Mexico, General Technology services include the assembly and testing of printed circuit boards, electromechanical devices, customized integrated systems cables and wire harnesses. General Technology will be integrated into the Aerospace segment.

The Company completed the following additional acquisitions in 2002, Trinity Airweighs, Kavey Water Products and Qualis Incorporated. In addition, the Company entered into a 70% owned joint venture in China furthering its low-cost pump manufacturing capabilities.

In September 2002, Crane sold its CorTec unit for approximately $3 million. CorTec manufactures fiberglass reinforced plastic plywood panels primarily for use in truck and trailer sidewalls.

During 2001, the Company completed acquisitions with a total purchase price aggregating $191 million. Goodwill for these acquisitions amounted to $67.9 million. In February 2001, the Company acquired Ventech Controls, Inc. located in Houston, Texas. This valve repair business provides both shop repair and remanufacture of control valves and instruments. The acquisition of Ventech significantly enhances Crane Valve Services’ capabilities in the Houston market, the largest valve service market in North America. Also in February 2001, the Company acquired the fiberglass reinforced panel business of UK-based Laminated Profiles Ltd. as part of its strategic initiative to penetrate the European transportation and recreational vehicle markets. This acquisition provides the Company’s Kemlite subsidiary with a quality manufacturing facility, an established distribution system and an enhanced market position in Europe.

On April 1, 2001, the Company acquired the Industrial Flow Group of Alfa Laval Holding AB (renamed Crane Process Flow Technologies) which includes the Saunders brand of diaphragm valves manufactured in the UK and India and the DEPA brand of air operated diaphragm pumps manufactured in Germany. Crane Process Flow Technologies focuses on the development, production and distribution of valves, pumps and related components in high value-added applications.

On June 29, 2001, the Company acquired the Xomox valve business from Emerson Electric for $145 million. Xomox supplies high-end, application-driven sleeved-plug valves, lined valves, high performance butterfly valves, and actuators to the chemical, petrochemical, pharmaceutical and other process industries. Xomox has major manufacturing facilities in Ohio, Mexico, Germany and Hungary, and operates many service centers in the Americas, Europe and Asia. In addition, Xomox holds a 49% interest in an Indian joint venture that manufactures and markets plug valves for the Indian and international markets. The Xomox acquisition brings global brand names with strong market positions that are complementary to the Company’s existing product lines.

During the third quarter of 2001, the Company acquired the aerospace hose product line of Teleflex Fluid Systems and Resistoflex GmbH. AeroHose, based in Lantana, Florida, is a leading supplier of Teflon^® braided high pressure hose assemblies utilized in both commercial and military aircraft as well as ground support systems. AeroHose products are complementary in technology and application to those of Crane’s Resistoflex division in Jacksonville, Florida. Resistoflex GmbH, based in Germany, is a leading manufacturer of Teflon^®-lined steel piping products serving chemical and pharmaceutical markets in Europe. This acquisition provides Resistoflex with European-based manufacturing operations to complement its facilities in North America and Asia enhancing its capabilities to serve its customers in the chemical processing industry worldwide.

In September 2001, the Company sold Powers Process Controls for its carrying value. The Company also sold its Canadian Plumbing business recording an after-tax loss of approximately $8.5 million. Proceeds from the sale of the businesses were approximately $20 million.

During the third quarter of 2001, Crane and Emerson Electric Co. announced the formation of a joint venture involving Emerson’s Commercial Cam unit and Crane’s Ferguson business unit. Emerson and Crane contributed their respective operations into a new company, Industrial Motion Control Holdings, LLC. Crane also contributed $12 million of cash into the venture. The joint venture is being accounted for on the equity basis and the investment, which was $19.6 million at year-end 2001, is included in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet.

During 2000, the Company completed two acquisitions at a total cost of $11.9 million. In March, the Company acquired Streamware Corporation, a privately-held company based in Norwood, Massachusetts, and a leading provider of business management software and market analysis tools for the vending

36

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

and food service industry. In December, the Company acquired the assets of the Valve Repair Division of Groth Corporation which will make it possible to expand into safety valve testing and repair in the key Houston, Texas, market. Goodwill for these two acquisitions amounted to $8.5 million.

In May 2000, the Company sold its interest in Powec AS, a Norwegian manufacturer of power supplies for the telecommunications industry. In addition, the Company’s wholly-owned ELDEC Corporation subsidiary sold its related telecommunications power supply product line to the same company. Total consideration for both businesses was $45.6 million. The Company accounted for its investment in Powec AS using the equity method.

All acquisitions were accounted for by the purchase method. The results of operations for all acquisitions have been included in the financial statements from their respective dates of purchase.

Pro forma amounts for 2002 and 2000 acquisitions were not presented because their impact on results of operations was not material. For the 2001 acquisitions, the following unaudited pro forma financial information presents the combined results of operations of the Company as if the acquisitions had taken place at the beginning of the year. The pro forma amounts give effect to certain adjustments, including the amortization of goodwill and intangibles, increased interest expense and income tax effects. This pro forma information does not necessarily reflect the results of operations as they would have been if the businesses had been managed by the Company during these periods and is not indicative of results that may be obtained in the future. Pro forma 2001 results are as follows: net sales revenue of $1.68 billion, net income of $90.1 million and diluted net income per share of $1.49.

Preferred Share Purchase Rights

On June 27, 1998, the Company adopted a Shareholder Rights Plan to replace the existing Plan which expired on that date. The Company distributed one preferred share purchase right for each outstanding share of common stock. The preferred rights were not exercisable when granted and may only become exercisable under certain circumstances involving actual or potential acquisitions of the Company’s common stock by a person or affiliated persons. Depending upon the circumstances, if the rights become exercisable, the holder may be entitled to purchase shares of the Company’s Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, or shares of common stock of the acquiring person. Preferred shares purchasable upon exercise of the rights will not be redeemable. Each preferred share will be entitled to preferential rights regarding dividend and liquidation payments, voting power and, in the event of any merger, consolidation or other transaction in which common shares are exchanged, a preferential exchange rate. The rights will remain in existence until June 27, 2008, unless they are earlier terminated, exercised or redeemed. The Company has authorized five million shares of $.01 par value preferred stock, of which 500,000 shares have been designated as Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock.

Stock-Based Compensation Plans

The Company has two stock-based compensation plans: the Stock Incentive Plan and the Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan. In accounting for its stock-based compensation plans, the Company applies the intrinsic value method prescribed by APB No. 25, “Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees.” Intrinsic value is the amount by which the market price of the underlying stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock option or award on the measurement date, generally the date of grant. No stock-based employee compensation expense is reflected in net income, as all options granted under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the underlying common stock on the date of grant. Compensation expense recognized for its restricted stock awards was $3.6 million in 2002 and $7.2 million in 2001, while the net reversal of previously recorded compensation expense was $2.3 million in 2000. The 2001 expense includes $6.1 million related to the accelerated vesting of Chairman R.S. Evans’ awards. The pro forma net income and earnings per share listed below reflect the impact of measuring compensation expense for options granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000 in accordance with the fair-value-based method prescribed by SFAS 123, “Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation.” These amounts may not be representative of future years’ amounts, as options vest over a three-year period and, generally, additional awards are made each year.

(in thousands except per share data)	2002			2001			2000
Net (loss) income as reported	$	(11,448	)	$	88,620		$	123,729
Less: Compensation expense determined under fair value based method for all awards, net of tax effects		(5,162	)		(6,062	)		(6,656	)
Pro forma		(16,610	)		82,558			117,073
Net income per share
Basic as reported		(0.19	)		1.48			2.03
Pro forma		(0.28	)		1.38			1.92
Diluted as reported		(0.19	)		1.47			2.02
Pro forma		(0.28	)		1.37			1.91
The weighted average fair value of options granted was $6.42 per share in 2002, $7.64 per share in 2001 and $5.91 per share in 2000. These estimates were based on the Black-Scholes multiple option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
	2002			2001			2000
Dividend yield		1.72	%		1.48	%		2.00	%
Volatility		27.97	%		27.02	%		26.46	%
Risk-free interest rates		4.67	%		4.89	%		6.64	%
Expected lives in years		5.23			5.11			5.11

37

Options are granted under the Stock Incentive Plan to officers and other key employees and directors at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant. Options become exercisable at a rate of 50% after the first year, 75% after the second year and 100% after the third year from the date of grant and expire ten years after the date of grant. A summary of stock option activity follows:

(Shares in thousands)	Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Price
2000
Options outstanding at beginning of year	5,137		$	22.36
Granted	1,134			20.46
Exercised	(797	)		15.52
Canceled	(532	)		27.07
Options outstanding at end of year	4,942			22.52
Options exercisable at end of year	3,045			22.48
2001
Granted	1,353			27.10
Exercised	(542	)		16.20
Canceled	(408	)		29.14
Options outstanding at end of year	5,345			23.75
Options exercisable at end of year	3,288			23.01
2002
Granted	1,186			23.35
Exercised	(252	)		17.06
Canceled	(236	)		26.32
Options outstanding at end of year	6,043			23.85
Options exercisable at end of year	4,121			23.65

A summary of information regarding stock options outstanding at December 31, 2002, follows:

(Shares in thousands)		Options Outstanding		Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Prices	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Remaining Life (Years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price	Number of Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$26.78 – 33.54	2,082	7.03	$29.57	1,435	$30.68
22.48 – 23.69	1,271	8.70	$23.28	155	$23.51
16.96 – 21.96	2,436	5.99	$23.07	2,277	$20.42
10.45 – 14.12	254	.19	$12.88	254	$12.88

The Stock Incentive Plan also provides for awards of restricted common stock to officers and other key employees, subject to risk of forfeiture restrictions which lapse over time or upon certain performance objectives. The Company awarded 109,809 restricted shares with a weighted average fair value of $23.51 in 2002. As of December 31, 2002, there were available for future awards a total of 209,691 shares.

Under the Non-Employee Director Stock Compensation Plan, directors who are not full-time employees of the Company receive the portion of their annual retainer that exceeds $15,000 in shares of common stock. The shares are issued each year after the Company’s annual meeting, are forfeitable if the director ceases to remain a director until the Company’s next annual meeting and may not be sold for a period of five years or until the director leaves the Board. Also under this plan, at the date of the annual meeting, each non-employee director is granted an option to purchase 2,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the shares on the date of grant exercisable at a rate of 50% after the first year, 75% after the second year and 100% after the third year from the date of grant, expiring ten years after the date of grant. For 2002, the non-employee directors received an aggregate of 14,000 shares with a weighted average fair value of $28.38. Upon the adoption of this plan in 2000, each non-employee director received a grant of options to purchase common stock with an aggregate value, determined on the basis of the Black-Scholes method, equal to his accrued benefit under a retirement plan for non-employee directors which was terminated. One director elected to remain in the retirement plan and does not receive options under the new plan.

Segment Information

The Company’s segments are reported on the same basis used internally for evaluating segment performance and for allocating resources. At the end of 2002, the Company changed its organizational structure relating to Resistoflex, the most significant component of which is now managed in the Fluid Handling segment. The remaining component is included in the Aerospace segment. All prior year segment information has been reclassified to reflect this change. In addition, segment information has been reclassified to reflect goodwill amortization in prior years as a Corporate reconciling item for segment comparability purposes.

The Company has five reporting segments: Aerospace, Engineered Materials, Merchandising Systems, Fluid Handling and Controls.

The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies.

The Company accounts for intersegment sales and transfers as if the sales or transfers were to third parties at current market prices.

38

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Information by reporting segments follows:

(in thousands)	2002			2001			2000
Aerospace
Net sales—outside	$	340,762		$	406,040		$	355,829
Net sales—intersegment		—			—			—
Operating profit before goodwill amortization		70,698			100,854			87,939
Goodwill amortization		—			2,742			2,809
Operating profits		70,698			98,112			85,130
Assets		261,630			261,444			263,505
Capital expenditures		8,670			10,402			9,155
Depreciation and amortization		11,587			14,579			13,560
Engineered Materials
Net sales—outside	$	233,180		$	232,762		$	282,891
Net sales—intersegment		—			1,506			2,018
Operating profit before goodwill amortization		44,366			32,983			45,091
Goodwill amortization		—			5,838			5,716
Operating profits		44,366			27,145			39,375
Assets		191,038			159,654			190,017
Capital expenditures		1,079			1,460			3,299
Depreciation and amortization		5,164			11,848			11,658
Merchandising Systems
Net sales—outside	$	161,901		$	216,377		$	220,557
Net sales—intersegment		19			—			—
Operating profit before goodwill amortization		7,186			28,432			34,042
Goodwill amortization		—			2,840			2,758
Operating profits		7,186			25,592			31,284
Assets		114,582			139,615			159,912
Capital expenditures		4,124			5,872			6,182
Depreciation and amortization		6,846			9,275			8,977
Fluid Handling
Net sales—outside	$	715,806		$	630,848		$	511,107
Net sales—intersegment		23			13			37
Operating profit before goodwill amortization		53,688			49,041			44,160
Goodwill amortization		—			4,744			3,752
Operating profits		53,688			44,297			40,408
Assets		599,474			581,943			342,562
Capital expenditures		10,500			13,148			8,527
Depreciation and amortization		18,663			19,886			15,223
Controls
Net sales—outside	$	64,698		$	101,153		$	120,806
Net sales—intersegment		61			744			1,083
Operating profit (loss) before goodwill amortization		4,815			3,929			(260	)
Goodwill amortization		—			1,897			1,879
Operating profits		4,815			2,032			(2,139	)
Assets		52,500			73,798			117,955
Capital expenditures		1,052			1,166			2,128
Depreciation and amortization		2,501			6,100			6,619
Consolidated net sales
Reporting segments	$	1,516,450		$	1,589,443		$	1,494,328
Intersegment elimination		(103	)		(2,263	)		(3,138	)
TOTAL NET SALES	$	1,516,347		$	1,587,180		$	1,491,190
Operating profit
Reporting segments	$	180,753		$	215,239		$	210,972
Corporate—before asbestos		(25,797	)		(23,278	)		(10,092	)
Corporate—asbestos charges		(115,285	)		(2,216	)		—
Goodwill amortization		—			(18,061	)		(16,914	)
Intersegment elimination		—			—			60
TOTAL OPERATING PROFIT	$	39,671		$	171,684		$	184,026
Assets
Reporting segments	$	1,219,224		$	1,216,454		$	1,073,951
Corporate		194,472			75,661			69,900
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,413,696		$	1,292,115		$	1,143,851
Capital expenditures
Reporting segments	$	25,425		$	32,048		$	29,291
Corporate		71			96			686
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES	$	25,496		$	32,144		$	29,977
Depreciation and amortization
Reporting segments	$	44,761		$	61,688		$	56,037
Corporate		5,029			12,922			(756	)
TOTAL DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION	$	49,790		$	74,610		$	55,281

Information by geographic segments follows:

(in thousands)	2002			2001			2000
Net sales
United States	$	869,390		$	931,684		$	950,320
Canada		163,338			184,505			207,089
Europe		330,013			328,773			222,992
Other international		153,606			142,218			110,789
TOTAL NET SALES	$	1,516,347		$	1,587,180		$	1,491,190
Operating profit (loss)
United States	$	112,452		$	127,179		$	152,110
Canada		18,199			15,035			14,353
Europe		33,049			54,551			31,674
Other international		17,053			18,474			12,895
Corporate		(141,082	)		(25,494	)		(10,092	)
Goodwill amortization		—			(18,061	)		(16,914	)
TOTAL OPERATING PROFIT	$	39,671		$	171,684		$	184,026
Assets
United States	$	786,994		$	829,594		$	835,352
Canada		62,421			61,092			81,672
Europe		334,603			298,093			138,232
Other international		35,206			27,675			18,695
Corporate		194,472			75,661			69,900
TOTAL ASSETS	$	1,413,696		$	1,292,115		$	1,143,851

39

MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL REPORTING

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of Crane Co. and subsidiaries have been prepared by management in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and, in the judgment of management, present fairly and consistently the Company’s financial position and results of operations and cash flows. These statements by necessity include amounts that are based on management’s best estimates and judgments and give due consideration to materiality.

The accounting systems and internal accounting controls of the Company are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the financial records are reliable for preparing consolidated financial statements and maintaining accountability for assets and that, in all material respects, assets are safeguarded against loss from unauthorized use or disposition. Qualified personnel throughout the organization maintain and monitor these internal accounting controls on an ongoing basis. In addition, the Company’s internal audit department systematically reviews the adequacy and effectiveness of the controls and reports thereon. The consolidated financial statements have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, whose report appears on this page. The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, composed solely of outside directors, meets periodically with management and with the Company’s internal auditors and independent auditors to review matters relating to the quality of financial reporting and internal accounting control and the nature, extent and results of their audits. The Company’s internal auditors and independent auditors have free access to the Audit Committee.

Eric C. Fast

President, Chief Executive Officer and

Acting Chief Financial Officer

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’  REPORT

To the Shareholders of Crane Co.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Crane Co. and its subsidiaries (“the Company”) as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in common shareholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Crane Co. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

As discussed in the notes to the consolidated financial statements, as of January 1, 2002 the Company changed its method of accounting for goodwill to conform to Statement of Financial Accounting Standard No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets”.

Stamford, Connecticut

JANUARY 21, 2003

40

2001 REVIEW MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Aerospace

(dollars in millions)	2001 *			2000 *
Net sales	$	406.0		$	355.8
Operating profit		100.9			87.9
Gross margin		45.0	%		44.5	%
Operating margin		24.8	%		24.7	%

*Reclassified for goodwill amortization and to include the movement of Resistoflex-Aerospace from Engineered Materials (see segment information on page 38).

Despite the impact of the events of September 11, net sales and operating profit at Crane Aerospace rose 14% and 15%, respectively, in 2001, representing slight margin improvement. Aerospace remained Crane’s largest profit contributor, representing 26% of the Company’s net sales and 59% of operating profit.

The events of September 11 had a significant impact on commercial aerospace. Orders for new aircraft were reduced or canceled, passenger revenues declined sharply and airlines rapidly reduced the size of their fleets. Aftermarket spares orders were dramatically reduced, causing order backlog to fall 30% at the end of the fourth quarter from the September level.

Following the events of September 11, Hydro-Aire/Lear Romec and ELDEC took aggressive actions to reduce costs and to resize the business. In the fourth quarter, the work force of those businesses was reduced 13% and severance costs of $1.9 million were incurred. Facing the downturn in commercial aircraft production levels, Crane Aerospace intensified its research and development focus on safety and reduced cost of ownership. These activities were directed at retrofit applications to address the installed base of approximately 13,000 aircraft.

ELDEC recorded a 4% operating profit gain on a 9% increase in net sales, maintaining strong profitability despite new program investments, in part, through cost-reducing operational excellence initiatives. Working with Hamilton-Sundstrand, ELDEC developed electrical system products for two regional jet families—the Embraer 170-190 and the Fairchild-Dornier 728-928. ELDEC also developed new proximity sensing electronics for the Boeing 777, was selected to provide a flap skew detection system for the Bombardier CRJ-200 regional jet and won flowmeter and pressure transducer business on the Pratt & Whitney 6000 and Rolls-Royce Trent 900 jet engines. ELDEC was awarded positions on the Cessna Sovereign and Sikorsky S-92 programs. ELDEC received Boeing’s coveted Q100 Supplier Quality Recognition Award and was named Sub-Contract Supplier of the Year by Rockwell-Collins.

Hydro-Aire acquired Lear Romec in an internal acquisition during the year. Net sales of the combined businesses increased 10% from the prior year level, operating profit increased 3%. Operating margins declined slightly in 2001 due primarily to new program development costs.

Hydro-Aire maintained its leading world market share in antiskid brake control systems, with strong showings in the commercial, regional, business and military markets.

Hydro-Aire has brake control systems on every Boeing aircraft, and a 75% market share in ongoing military programs, including the F/A-18 E/F, the C-130J and the C-17. Hydro-Aire has fuel pumps on 65% of all Boeing planes and holds a 30% share of the commercial market.

The government’s award of the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) contract to Lockheed Martin was a major event for Hydro-Aire, as they will supply the brake controls. The JSF program may involve over 3,000 aircraft for the U.S. and Great Britain, although production will not begin until 2008. New and derivative brake controls are being sold to unmanned aircraft and retrofit military markets, with production expected after 2002. Through its pursuit of operational excellence initiatives, Hydro-Aire achieved identifiable new cost savings of over $5 million in 2001, a slightly larger gain than in 2000.

Lear-Romec was awarded the lube and scavenge pump contract for the Rolls-Royce lift fan for the JSF program. Application engineering will begin in 2002 and production in 2006. The business’s research and development efforts are focused on four areas: lighter-weight pumps, extension of vane pump technology to high-pressure applications, variable frequency A.C. motors for fuel pumps, and cost reduction efforts on the Rolls Royce Trent 700/800 engine series.

Resistoflex operating profits were up by 4% in a post-September 11th commercial aerospace market.

Future prospects for Resistoflex were improved by an acquisition made during the year. In September, the Company acquired AeroHose, a manufacturer of high pressure, plastic-lined hoses used mainly in military aircraft. AeroHose products complement Resistoflex’s aerospace tube and fitting business and was consolidated into the existing Jacksonville facility in the first quarter of 2002.

A high point of 2001 was the turnaround performance of Interpoint, a manufacturer of power supplies and microelectronic assemblies. Under new leadership at Interpoint, a strong team was established that revitalized the company. Interpoint progressed from an operating loss of $4 million in 2000 to an operating profit of $5 million in 2001 on higher net sales, largely due to the implementation of operational excellence processes and lean manufacturing principles. Interpoint has established a mixed technology and volume automated production cell providing customers with a “one-stop-shopping” solution for their microelectronic needs. The uniqueness of this manufacturing technology enables Interpoint to combine both hybrid and surface-mount capabilities (including flip chip, ball grid arrays, and chip scale packages) in a single in-line assembly process, with the flexibility and speed to handle a wide range of volume requirements.

41

2001 REVIEW MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Engineered Materials

(dollars in millions)	2001*			2000 *
Net sales	$	234.3		$	284.9
Operating profit		33.0			45.1
Gross margin		23.7	%		24.9	%
Operating margin		14.1	%		15.8	%

*Reclassified for goodwill amortization and to reflect the movement of Resistoflex to Aerospace and Fluid Handling (see segment information on page 38).

Net sales, operating profits and margins declined in Engineered Materials in 2001 primarily because of lower net sales to depressed transportation and chemical process markets.

Engineered Materials net sales of $234.3 million were down 18% from $284.9 million in 2000, while operating profits slid 27% from $45.1 million to $33.0 million. Operating margins were 14.1% versus 15.8%. Net sales at Kemlite were enhanced by acquisitions. Kemlite outperformed their markets and essentially maintained their strong market position.

Kemlite, the largest business in the segment, had net sales and operating profit declines of 15% and 28%, respectively, in 2001. Operating margins remained strong in the mid-term as aggressive cost reductions and improved operating efficiencies partially offset the impact of extremely weak end markets. Net sales of its fiberglass-reinforced plastic (“FRP”) panels and translucent roofs for truck trailers were down sharply but less than the market which fell by 50% from 200,000 units in 2000 to 100,000 units in 2001. Net sales of FRP panels for recreational vehicles (“RV”) declined in line with the overall market which was down 13%. Net sales of building products, including Kemlite’s Sequentia brands, were down modestly from the prior year level. Kemlite’s international net sales were also down on reduced purchases by several major customers, partially offset by stronger European and Canadian net sales.

Kemlite’s $6 million acquisition of Laminated Profiles (renamed Kemlite Ltd.), a continuous panel FRP producer based in the United Kingdom, in February 2001, gave the company an important foothold in Europe. Kemlite Ltd. serves transportation and RV markets mainly within the U.K. and added $7 million to 2001 net sales.

In an internal acquisition, Cor Tec became part of Kemlite in 2001. Facing depressed markets, both companies downsized their work forces by mid-year and focused on reducing operating costs to strengthen margins. To improve efficiencies, Kemlite conducted several Kaizen events and expanded its operational excellence program, surpassing its cost savings goals in 2001. In addition, the entire management staff participated in lean manufacturing training in 2001.

As part of Crane’s effort to merge or divest non-core marginal or unprofitable businesses, Crane Plumbing was sold in October 2001 at an after-tax loss of $8.5 million. Crane Plumbing operated at a $1.5 million loss in 2001 on net sales of $28.5 million. Engineered Materials operating margin without Plumbing was 16.8% in 2001.

42

2001 REVIEW MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Merchandising Systems

(dollars in millions)	2001*			2000 *
Net sales	$	216.4		$	220.6
Operating profit		28.4			34.0
Gross margin		32.9	%		34.3	%
Operating margin		13.1	%		15.4	%

*Reclassified for goodwill amortization (see segment information on page 38).

Merchandising Systems recorded slightly lower net sales and a 16% decline in operating profit as strong results at National Rejectors, Inc. (NRI) were more than offset by a sharp decline at Crane Merchandising Systems (CMS). Combined net sales declined 2% to $216.4 million, compared with $220.6 million in 2000. Operating profit decreased from $34.0 million in 2000 to $28.4 million in 2001. Operating margins declined from 15.4% in 2000 to 13.1%.

The success story in 2001 was the performance of German-based NRI, Crane’s manufacturer of coin-changing and coin-validation devices. In the year prior to the January 2002 introduction of Euro coins, net sales of NRI’s new Euro-capable devices escalated dramatically as vending operators sought to equip their machines for the new Euro coins. Net sales rose 80% in 2001, while operating profit rose 167%, with exceptionally strong margins. Once the initial strong demand for its Euro-capable electronic devices was met, orders fell sharply and NRI reduced its production and work force as planned.

Crane Merchandising Systems faced difficult markets throughout 2001, both domestically and internationally, for its coffee, food and snack-vending machines. As the U.S. economy slowed, layoffs increased at offices and factories where the bulk of vending machines are installed. Vending operators pulled machines out of service and scaled back orders for new ones. European net sales, mainly in the U.K., held up through mid-year, but began to weaken as these economies softened in the second half of 2001. As a result, Crane Merchandising Systems net sales declined 22% in 2001 from the prior year level and the business essentially broke even at the operating profit line.

During the year, management took aggressive actions to cut operating costs and optimize invested capital. CMS focused on core products and strategically eliminated expenses for efforts devoted to non-core programs. Overall, Crane Merchandising Systems downsized the work force by 15% in 2001 and rationalized non-core products. These actions cost the company approximately $3.2 million in operating profit during the year.

At the St. Louis manufacturing facility, lean enterprise systems to increase manufacturing efficiency and reduce inventories were implemented. Significant effort in training and execution of the new lean enterprise concepts led to a 25% inventory reduction. More importantly, St. Louis manufacturing operations improved quality, increased on-time delivery to 98% and reduced product lead times to less than eight days.

43

2001 REVIEW MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Fluid Handling

(dollars in millions)	2001 *			2000 *
Net sales	$	630.9		$	511.1
Operating profit		49.0			44.2
Gross margin		26.8	%		25.6	%
Operating margin		7.8	%		8.6	%

*Reclassified for goodwill amortization and to include the movement of Resistoflex-Industrial Products from Engineered Materials (see segment information on page 38).

Net sales of Fluid Handling products increased 23% while operating profit rose 11% in 2001 primarily as a result of the strategic acquisition of two valve companies. In 2001, Xomox and Crane Process Flow Technologies were acquired for $180 million. These and two other smaller acquisitions provided incremental net sales and operating profit of $125 million and $7.6 million, respectively. These acquisitions strengthen Fluid Handling’s position in the global valve industry through increased product offerings and selling channels significantly expanding overall market reach.

Fluid Handling net sales, excluding acquisitions, were flat in 2001 versus the prior year as organic growth in valve net sales of 5% was offset by lower pump shipments and slightly lower net sales at Crane Supply. The increase in valve shipments in 2001 reflects strong demand from longer-cycle power generation and marine markets and higher revenue from valve services. This was partially offset by extremely weak demand in Crane’s short-cycle valve businesses which sell through distribution and serve the chemical process and the general industrial markets.

For the year, operating profit remained flat, excluding the incremental profits from the acquisitions. Fluid Handling operating profit in 2001 was negatively impacted by $6 million in costs for workforce reductions, product line rationalizations and a plant consolidation. Operating margin, excluding these cost reduction initiatives, improved to 8.7% of net sales in 2001 versus 8.6% in 2000. Valve operating margin, excluding the cost reduction initiatives of $3.7 million, improved to 8.7% of net sales in 2001 compared to 6.5% in 2000 as a result of improved operating efficiencies and lower-cost product sourcing initiatives.

Crane’s business model calls for a global supply chain strategy across all its valve brands. In pursuit of this, valve production will continue to be shifted to lower-cost sources where we control product design and quality. The acquisition of Xomox and Crane Process Flow brought three new low-cost facilities under Crane control, two in India and one in Hungary. These facilities which manufacture plug, diaphragm and quarter turn butterfly valves complement Crane’s existing two facilities in China which manufacture iron and steel valves.

In addition, this business model will leverage the strong international net sales organizations, premium brand recognition and technology leadership in corrosive fluid handling and sanitary valve design of the Xomox and Crane Process Flow acquisition.

Continuing improvement of operating margins through cost cutting and increased operating efficiency, toward a long-term goal of 12%, is a principal objective of lean manufacturing initiatives. Key operational excellence metrics have improved significantly as a result of the leadership and initiatives of lean black belts trained in Six Sigma analytical techniques. For example, at Washington, Iowa, where Crane manufactures iron valves, on-time delivery improved from 74% to 93% over the two years ended December 31, 2001, while lead time decreased from three weeks to two. At the Brantford, Ontario facility, on-time delivery for bronze valves improved to 97%, lead time declined to six weeks, and inventory turns improved from 1.7 to 2.9 over the twelve month period ended December 31, 2001. Crane is targeting comparable improvements at Xomox and Crane Process Flow plants.

At Crane Pumps & Systems, markets softened throughout 2001. Net sales were off by 10% as a result of weakness in the general industrial market. Operating profit and margin were down significantly reflecting the net sales decline as well as work force reductions and a plant consolidation which negatively impacted operating profits by $2.3 million in 2001. These actions reduced headcount by 14% in 2001. Crane Pumps & Systems also combined seven net sales forces for its various brands into two and plans to expand its sourcing of lower-cost components and finished product from China.

Crane Supply, a Canada-based distributor of pipe, valves and fittings, had a slight decline in net sales in 2001 while operating profit was 12% below prior year levels. Overall operating margin remained at 7% of net sales.

Resistoflex operating profits were down by 30% in an extremely weak chemical process market. Operating margins were in the mid-teens and should rebound as chemical process markets recover.

Future prospects for Resistoflex were improved by an acquisitions made during the year. In July, the company acquired its German licensee, Resistoflex GmbH, gaining a solid position in Europe. The European operation is working closely with the recently acquired Xomox which makes plastic-lined valves that complement Resistoflex’s products. Resistoflex now has manufacturing facilities in the U.S., Europe and Singapore. In addition, the Singapore unit has set up a wholly-owned business in China to sell to that country’s fast-growing chemical process industry.

Resistoflex maintained a sharp focus on operational improvements to reduce costs and improve margins positioning itself for rapid growth when markets turn. Operational excellence initiatives and a focus on key metrics helped to improve on-time delivery, quality and lead times.

44

2001 REVIEW MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF OPERATIONS

Controls

(dollars in millions)	2001 *			2000 *
Net sales	$	101.9		$	121.9
Operating profit		3.9			(0.3	)
Gross margin		35.1	%		31.0	%
Operating margin		3.9	%		(0.2	)%

*Reclassifed for goodwill amortization (see segment information on page 38).

Net sales declined by 16% while operating profit and margins improved in Controls during 2001. This reflects the impact of the 2001 disposition of two non-core businesses and an improvement at Azonix/Dynalco.

Crane took a number of strategic actions in 2001 to improve Controls, which has faced flat-to-lower net sales and declining profits and margins in recent years. The Ferguson business was contributed to a joint venture and Powers Process Controls was sold. Aggregate net sales for these two businesses were $33 million in 2001.

In September 2001, the Company and Emerson Electric Co. announced the formation of a joint venture involving Emerson’s Commercial Cam Co. unit and the Company’s Ferguson business. The Company and Emerson contributed their respective operations into a new company, Industrial Motion Control Holding, LLC. Crane also contributed $12 million of cash into this joint venture, which is accounted for under the equity method of accounting by Crane. Market related synergies and facility rationalization are expected to improve the business model for the Company’s Ferguson investment going forward. Improved pricing and cost-reduction efforts reduced losses at Ferguson’s operations for the nine month period before the start of the joint venture to $2.1 million, compared with a full-year loss of $4.8 million in 2000.

Powers Process Controls, a marginally profitable business with no potential linkages with other Crane businesses, was sold at book value to a strategic buyer during 2001.

Barksdale, a leader in ride-leveling air suspension valves for heavy trucks and trailers and in blowout prevention valves used in oil and gas exploration, saw net sales decline by 9% as its principal markets, transportation, oil and gas exploration and general industrial, all weakened.

Operating profits at Barksdale dropped 31% due to the lower volume and lower margins that reflect expenses for severance and costs of product rationalization programs. During the year, Barksdale has made operational improvements which are expected to benefit future performance. These include improvements in customer metrics for on-time delivery and lead-time.

In addition, the company realigned its sales organization to a market-focused distribution approach. At the end of 2001, Barksdale launched a new pressure valve for the transportation industry to be shipped in early 2002.

In 2001, Azonix and Dynalco were combined in an “internal acquisition” under common leadership. While Azonix/Dynalco net sales revenue was flat, operating profits more than doubled during 2001. These results reflect the benefits of consolidation, rigorous cost controls and favorable product mix. An increase in net sales was achieved on strong military orders and improving oil and gas industry orders for human machine interface displays and controls for hazardous environments, a market the company dominates. However, this was offset by a slight net sales decline on engine instruments and controls as well as diagnostic equipment, despite a strong fourth quarter.

Integration of the two management teams enabled the companies to leverage core competencies to make operations more efficient and strengthen market presence, particularly in the important oil and gas markets. Consolidation of the sales and marketing organizations improved market coverage, customer focus and use of resources. Significant gains were made in the key operational excellence metrics of on-time delivery, lead time and quality while continued product innovation set the stage for future growth.

Corporate

(dollars in millions)	2001			2000
Corporate charges	$	(25.4	)	$	(10.1	)
Interest income		1.1			0.8
Interest expense		(21.2	)		(21.6	)
Miscellaneous—net		(15.7	)		27.1
Effective tax rate on income		34.8	%		35.0	%

The increase in Corporate expenses is primarily due to higher employee-related costs including a non-cash charge of $6.1 million resulting from the retirement of R.S. Evans as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and represents stock-based retirement costs that previously were being amortized to an anticipated retirement at age 65.

In 2001, Miscellaneous—net is primarily a loss on the disposal of Crane Plumbing of $13.8 million. In addition it includes equity income of $.9 million earned from the joint venture formed late in the third quarter of 2001 between Crane Co. and Emerson Electric Co. In 2000, $26.6 million from the gain on sale of the Company’s investment in Powec AS and a related telecommunication power supply product line is included in Miscellaneous—net.

45

FIVE YEAR SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Years Ended December 31, (in thousands, except per share data)	2002			2001		2000		1999		1998
Net sales	$	1,516,347		$	1,587,180	$	1,491,190	$	1,553,657	$	1,561,055
Operating profit		39,671			171,684		184,026		169,554		211,961
Interest expense		16,900			21,187		21,564		27,854		27,661
Income before taxes and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		24,453			135,817		190,360		155,795		192,789
Provision for income taxes		7,825			47,197		66,631		54,897		67,947
Income before taxes and cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		16,628			88,620		123,729		100,898		124,842
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(28,076	)		—		—		—		—
(Loss) income from continuing operations		(11,448	)		88,620		123,729		100,898		124,842
Income from continuing operations per diluted share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		0.28			1.47		2.02		1.50		1.80
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(0.47	)		—		—		—		—
(Loss) income from continuing operations per diluted share		(0.19	)		1.47		2.02		1.50		1.80
Cash dividends per common share		0.40			0.40		0.40		0.40		0.37
Total assets		1,413,696			1,292,115		1,143,851		1,180,697		1,379,731
Long-term debt		205,318			302,368		213,790		286,772		357,710

QUARTERLY RESULTS FOR THE YEAR

Years Ended December 31, (in thousands, except per share data)	First			Second		Third		Fourth			Year
2002
Net sales	$	371,545		$	391,613	$	385,981	$	367,208		$	1,516,347
Cost of sales		255,420			265,969		273,178		359,984			1,154,551
Gross profit		116,125			125,644		112,803		7,224			361,796
Income (loss) before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		20,797			26,563		20,477		(51,209	)		16,628
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(28,076	)		—		—		—			(28,076	)
Net (loss) income		(7,279	)		26,563		20,477		(51,209	)		(11,448	)
Income (loss) from continuing operations per diluted share before cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		.35			.44		.34		(.86	)		.28
Cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle		(.47	)		—		—		—			(.47	)
Net (loss) income per diluted share		(.12	)		.44		.34		(.86	)		(.19	)
2001
Net sales	$	379,283		$	409,034	$	426,212	$	372,651		$	1,587,180
Cost of sales		259,827			279,010		295,114		258,586			1,092,537
Gross profit		119,456			130,024		131,098		114,065			494,643
Net income		20,279			32,463		17,869		18,009			88,620
Net income per diluted share		.33			.54		.30		.30			1.47

46

MARKET AND DIVIDEND INFORMATION – CRANE CO. COMMON SHARES

	New York Stock Exchange Composite Price per Share								Dividends per Share
Quarter	2002 High		2002 Low		2001 High		2001 Low		2002		2001
First	$	27.42	$	22.15	$	28.38	$	24.25	$	.10	$	.10
Second	$	28.97	$	24.19	$	31.56	$	24.95	$	.10	$	.10
Third	$	25.53	$	18.59	$	32.25	$	19.95	$	.10	$	.10
Fourth	$	21.80	$	17.72	$	26.33	$	20.09	$	.10	$	.10
									$	.40	$	.40

On December 31, 2002 there were approximately 4,338 holders of record of Crane Co. common stock.

CRANE CO. COMMON SHARE OWNERSHIP INCLUSIVE OF STOCK OPTIONS EXERCISABLE BY MANAGEMENT AND DIRECTORS

* includes The Crane Fund, a private charitable trust (7,778,416 shares) and Gabelli Asset Management Company (4,945,824 shares)

47

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

These Corporate Governance Guidelines reflect the Board’s commitment to monitor the effectiveness of policy and decision making both at the Board and management level, with a view to enhancing long-term stockholder value.

The Board’s Goal

The Board’s goal is to build long-term value for the Company’s stockholders and to assure the vitality of the Company for its customers, employees and the other individuals and organizations who depend on the Company.

Size of the Board

The Board believes that it should generally have no fewer than nine and no more than twelve directors.

Selection of New Directors

The nominees for director shall be those people who, after taking into account their skills, expertise, integrity, diversity and other qualities, are believed to enhance the Board’s ability to manage and direct, in an effective manner, the affairs and business of the Company.

The Nominating and Governance Committee shall be responsible for assessing the appropriate balance of criteria required of Board members.

Each director shall be expected, within a reasonable period of time following his or her election to the Board, to own stock in the Company in an amount that is appropriate for such director’s financial circumstances.

Other Public Company Directorships

Directors who also serve as Chief Executive Officers should not serve on more than two public company boards in addition to the Board, and other directors should not sit on more than four public company boards in addition to the Board. The members of the Audit Committee should not serve on more than two other audit committees of public companies.

Independence of the Board

The Board shall be comprised of a substantial majority of directors who qualify as independent directors (“Independent Directors”) under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”).

Retirement Policy for Directors

The Board does not believe that there should be fixed criteria requiring automatic retirement from the Board. However, the Board recognizes that there are certain events that could have an effect on a person’s ability to be an effective contributor to the Board process. Accordingly, each director who has attained the age of 70, served on the Board for fifteen years or changed the position he or she held when he or she became a member of the Board should so notify the Nominating and Governance Committee and offer to submit his or her resignation as a director effective at such time. The Nominating and Governance Committee shall review the continued appropriateness of the affected director remaining on the Board under the circumstances.

Board Compensation

A director who is also an officer of the Company shall not receive additional compensation for such service as a director.

The Company believes that compensation for non-employee directors should be competitive and should encourage increased ownership of the Company’s stock through the payment of a portion of director compensation in Company stock, options to purchase Company stock or similar compensation. Director’s fees (including any additional amounts paid to chairmen of committees and to members of committees of the Board) are the only compensation a member of the Audit Committee may receive from the Company. Any charitable contribution in excess of $10,000 to a charity or other tax exempt organization in which a director or executive officer of the Company is a trustee or Board member or which under the rules established by the NYSE would cause a director to be deemed not to be independent shall require the prior approval of the Audit Committee.

Board Operations

There shall be nine regularly scheduled meetings of the Board each year. At least one regularly scheduled meeting of the Board shall be held each calendar quarter.

The non-management directors of the Company shall meet in executive session without management on a regularly scheduled basis, but no less than two times a year. The Chairman of the Board shall preside at such executive sessions, unless such person is a member of management of the Company. If the Chairman is a member of management of the Company, the presiding person at executive sessions shall rotate on an annual basis among the chairmen of the Nominating and Governance Committee, Audit Committee and Management Organization and Compensation Committee.

Strategic Direction of the Company

It is management’s job, under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer, to formalize, propose and establish strategic direction, subject to review and input by the Board. It is also the primary responsibility of management, under the direction of the Chief Executive Officer, to implement the Company’s business plans in accordance with such strategic direction and for the Board to monitor and evaluate, with the assistance of the Chief Executive Officer, strategic results.

Board Access to Management

Board members shall have access to the Company’s management and, as appropriate, to the Company’s outside advisors.

Attendance of Management Personnel at Board Meetings

The Board encourages the Chief Executive Officer to bring members of management who are not directors from time to time into Board meetings to (i) provide management insight into items being discussed by the Board which involve the manager; (ii) make presentations to the Board on matters which involve the manager; and (iii) bring managers with significant potential into contact with the Board. Attendance of such management personnel at Board meetings is at the discretion of the Board.

48

“I am resolved to conduct my business in the strictest honesty and fairness; to avoid all deception and trickery; to deal fairly with both customers and competitors; to be liberal and just toward employees and to put my whole mind upon the business.”

We remain as committed to R.T. Crane’s words today as we were in 1855. This code of ethics is the benchmark we use to measure ourselves, and it continues to guide us in all we do.

COMMITTEES

The Company shall have four standing committees. The Audit Committee, Management Organization and Compensation Committee and Nominating and Governance Committee shall be composed entirely of independent directors as defined by the NYSE.

Executive Committee

This committee meets when a quorum of the full Board of Directors cannot be readily obtained.

Audit Committee

This committee meets routinely with the Company’s management, internal auditors and independent auditors to review matters relating to the quality of financial reporting and internal accounting controls and the nature, extent and results of their audits, and otherwise maintain communications between the auditors of the Company and the Board of Directors.

Management Organization and Compensation Committee

This committee’s responsibilities include recommending to the Board of Directors all actions regarding compensation of the Chief Executive Officer, review of the compensation of other officers and business unit presidents, annual review of director compensation, administration of the EVA Incentive Compensation Plan and Stock Incentive Plan and review and approval of significant changes or additions to the compensation policies and practices of the Company. This committee will provide the Chief Executive Officer with an annual performance review. It shall be responsible for determining that a satisfactory system is in effect for education, development, and orderly succession of senior and mid-level managers throughout the Company.

Nominating and Governance Committee

This committee is responsible for identifying, screening and recommending candidates to the Board for Board membership. It shall be responsible for sponsoring an annual self-assessment of the Board’s performance as well as the performance of each committee of the Board. It shall be responsible for recommendations with respect to the assignment of Board members to various committees and appointing committee chairmen.

DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS

Directors

E. Thayer Bigelow, Jr. (1, 3, 4)

Managing Director

Bigelow Media

Investment in Media and Entertainment Companies

Robert S. Evans (1)

Chairman of the Board

Eric C. Fast (1)

President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company

Richard S. Forté (2)

Chairman

Forte´ Cashmere Company

Importer and Manufacturer

Dorsey R. Gardner (2, 3)

President

Kelso Management Company, Inc.

Investment Management

Jean Gaulin (2, 4)

Retired Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  Ultramar Diamond Shamrock Corporation

Refiner and Marketer of Petroleum Products

William E. Lipner

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer  NFO WorldGroup Inc.

Marketing Information/Research Services Worldwide

Dwight C. Minton (1, 3, 4)

Chairman Emeritus of the Board of Church & Dwight Co., Inc.

Manufacturer of Consumer and Specialty Products

Charles J. Queenan, Jr. (2, 4)

Senior Counsel  Kirkpatrick & Lockhart LLP

Attorneys at Law

James L. L. Tullis (3)

Chief Executive Officer

Tullis-Dickerson & Co.

Venture Capital to Health Care Industry

Corporate Officers

Eric C. Fast

President and Chief Executive Officer

Gil A. Dickoff

Treasurer

Augustus I. duPont

Vice President,

General Counsel and Secretary

Bradley L. Ellis

Vice President,

Chief Information Officer

Elise M. Kopczick

Vice President, Human Resources

Joan Atkinson Nano

Vice President, Controller

Thomas M. Noonan

Vice President, Taxes

Anthony D. Pantaleoni

Vice President,

Environment, Health and Safety

SHAREHOLDER INFORMATION

Crane Co. Internet Site and Shareholder Information Line

Copies of Crane Co.’s report on Form 10-K for 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as well as other financial reports and news from Crane Co. may be read and downloaded off the Internet at www.craneco.com.

If you do not have access to the Internet, you may request printed materials by telephone, toll-free, from our Crane Co. Shareholder Direct^® information line at 1-888-CRANECR (1-888-272-6327).

Both services are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.

Annual Meeting

The Crane Co. annual meeting of shareholders will be held at 10:00 A.M. on April 28, 2003, at the Westin Hotel One First Stamford Place Stamford, CT 06902.

Stock Listing

Crane Co. common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol CR.

Auditors

Deloitte & Touche LLP

Stamford Harbor Park

Stamford, CT 06902

Equal Employment Opportunity Policy

Crane Co. is an equal opportunity employer. It is the policy of the company to recruit, hire, promote and transfer to all job classifications without regard to race, color, religion, sex, age, disability or national origin.

Environment, Health and Safety Policy

Crane Co. is committed to protecting the environment by taking responsibility to prevent serious or irreversible environmental degradation through efficient operations and activities. Crane Co. recognizes environmental management among its highest priorities throughout the corporation, and has established policies and programs that are integral and essential elements of the business plan of each of the business units. Additionally, Crane Co. has established the position of Vice President, Environment, Health and Safety, which is responsible for assuring compliance, measuring environment, health and safety performance and conducting associated audits on a regular basis in order to provide appropriate information to the Crane Co. management team and to regulatory authorities.

Stock Transfer Agent and Registrar of Stock

EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.

Customer Service: 1-781-575-2725

E-mail: equiserve@equiserve.com

Non-Postal Deliveries

150 Royall Street

Canton, MA 02021

General Correspondence/ Changes of Address/ Transfer of Stock Certificates

P.O. Box 43069

Providence, RI 02940-3069

Bond Trustee and Disbursing Agent

The Bank of New York Corporate Trust Department

1-800-438-5473

101 Barclay Street, 8W

New York, NY 10286

Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan

Crane Co. offers shareholders the opportunity to participate in a Dividend Reinvestment and Stock Purchase Plan. The plan provides two convenient methods for increasing your investment in Crane Co. common stock, without paying fees and commissions.

Dividend Reinvestment :

For all or part of your dividends on Crane Co. common stock; and

Voluntary Cash Payments:

Of any amount from $10 to a maximum of $5,000 a month. Under terms of the Plan, EquiServe Trust Company, N.A. will act as agent for shareholders interested in purchasing additional Crane common stock automatically, on a regular basis. The details of this plan and its benefits to you as a Crane Co. shareholder are described in a brochure available by writing to:

EquiServe Trust Company, N.A.

Crane Co.

Dividend Reinvestment Plan

P.O. Box 43081

Providence, RI 02940-3081

(1) Member of the Executive Committee

(2) Member of the Audit Committee

(3) Member of the Management Organization and Compensation Committee

(4) Member of the Nominating and Governance Committee

49

EX-21

Exhibit 21

CRANE CO.
Exhibit 21 to FORM 10-K
Annual Report for the Year Ended December 31, 2002

Subsidiaries of Registrant

The following is a list of active subsidiaries of the registrant and their jurisdictions of incorporation. Except as noted, all of these subsidiaries are wholly owned, directly or indirectly, and all are included in the consolidated financial statements.  The names of several other subsidiaries have been omitted, as they would not, if considered in the aggregate as a single subsidiary, constitute a significant subsidiary.

Corva Corporation						Missouri
Crane GmbH						Germany
				National Rejectors, Inc. GmbH		Germany
					NRI Iberica S.A.	Spain
Crane International Holdings, Inc.						Delaware
	Crane Canada Co.					Canada
	Crane Capital Corporation LLC					Delaware
		Crane Ningjin Valve Co.				China (90%)
				Crane Zhengying Rubber Co. Ltd.		China (80%)
	Crane Environmental Inc.					Delaware
	Industrial Motion Control Holdings, LLC					Delaware (49%)
	Crane Fenghiu (Zhejiang) Pump Co. Ltd.					China (70%)
	Crane FSC Corporation					Barbados
	Crane Holdings C.V					Netherlands
		Crane Global Holdings S.L.				Spain
				Crane Australia Pty. Ltd.		Australia
					P.T. Crane Indonesia	Indonesia (51%)
				Crane Process Flow Technologies S.r.l.		Italy
				Crane Holdings (Germany) GmbH		Germany
					Crane Process Flow Technologies S.P.R.L.	Belgium
					Crane Process Flow Technologies GmbH	Germany
				Crane (Ningbo) Yong Xiang Valve Co. Ltd.		China (70%)
				Xomox Hungary Kft.		Hungary
				Xomox International GmbH & Co.		Germany
				Xomox Japan Ltd.		Japan
				Xomox Korea Ltd.		Korea
				Xomox Southeast Asia Pte Ltd.		Singapore
		Crane International Capital B.V.				Netherlands
	Crane Ltd.					England
		Crane Europe Ltd.				Scotland
		Crane Merchandising Systems Ltd.				England
		Crane Process Flow Technologies Ltd.				England
			Crane Process Flow Technologies (India) Ltd.			India
		ELDEC Electronics Ltd.				England
		Stockham Valve Ltd.				England
	Crane Nantong Company Ltd.					China (70%)
	Crane Pumps & Systems, Inc.					Delaware
		Barnes Pumps, Inc.				Ohio
		Barnes Pumps Canada, Inc.				Canada
	Dyrotech Industries, Inc.					Delaware
	ELDEC Corporation					Washington
		ELDEC France S.A.R.L.				France
	General Technology Corporation					New Mexico
	Hydro-Aire, Inc.					California
	Interpoint Corporation					Washington
		Interpoint GmbH				Germany
		Interpoint S.A.R.L.				France
		Interpoint U.K. Ltd.				England

Exhibit 21 to FORM 10-K (Continued)

		Interpoint Taiwan Corporation		Taiwan
	Kemlite Company, Inc.			Delaware
		Sequentia, Inc.		Ohio
		Lasco Material, Inc.		Delaware
		Lasco Panels, Inc.		Delaware
			Lasco Composites, LP	Delaware
	Kemlite Ltd.			England
	Mark Controls Corporation			Delaware
		Azonix Corporation		Massachusetts
		Barksdale, Inc.		Delaware
		Dynalco Controls Corporation		Delaware
		Barksdale Control Products GmbH		Germany
		Westad Industri A/S		Norway
		Powers Process Controls Ltd.		Canada
	Resistoflex (Asia) Pte., Ltd.			Singapore
		Resistoflex Sdn. Bhd.		Malaysia
		Kessel (Thailand) Pte., Ltd.		Thailand (49%)
	Resistoflex GmbH			Germany
	Xomox Corporation			Ohio
		Xomox A.G.		Switzerland
		Xomox Chihuahua S.A. de C.V.		México
		Fisher-Xomox Sanmar Ltd.		India (49%)
		Xomox Corporation de Venezuela C.A.		Venezuela
		Xomox France S.A.		France
		Flow Technology, Inc.		Ohio
Crane Nuclear, Inc.				Delaware
Crane Overseas LLC				Delaware
Streamware Corporation				Massachusetts

EX-23

EXHIBIT 23

INDEPENDENT AUDITORS’ CONSENT

We consent to the incorporation by reference in Registration Statement No. 333-63678 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-63676 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-35860 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-37636 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-50489 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-50487 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 333-50495 on Form S-8, Registration Statement No. 33-53709 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-74271 on Form S-3, Registration Statement No. 333-06735 on Form S-8, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-59389 on Form S-8, Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-59475 on Form S-8 and Registration Statement No. 333-16555 on Form S-8 of our report dated January 21, 2003, incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K of Crane Co. for the year ended December 31, 2002.

/s/  DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP

Stamford, Connecticut

March 7, 2003

EX-99.1

Exhibit 99.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,
AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the Annual Report of Crane Co. (the “Company”) on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Eric C. Fast, President and Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer of the Company, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, hereby certify to the best of my knowledge that:

            (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

            (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ ERIC C.FAST

Eric C.Fast

President and Chief Executive Officer and Acting Chief Financial Officer

March 7, 2003