UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended December 31, 2011
OR
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission file number 1-3344
Sara Lee Corporation
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Maryland | 36-2089049 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
3500 Lacey Road, Downers Grove, Illinois 60515
(Address of principal executive offices)
(Zip Code)
(630) 598-6000
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of accelerated filer, large accelerated filer, smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | x | Accelerated filer | ¨ | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
On December 31, 2011, the Registrant had 591,592,387 outstanding shares of common stock $.01 par value, which is the Registrants only class of common stock.
SARA LEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
INDEX
2
SARA LEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and July 2, 2011
(Unaudited)
In millions |
December 31, 2011 |
July 2, 2011 |
||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and equivalents |
$ | 2,751 | $ | 2,066 | ||||
Trade accounts receivable, less allowances |
760 | 828 | ||||||
Inventories |
||||||||
Finished goods |
428 | 423 | ||||||
Work in process |
31 | 36 | ||||||
Materials and supplies |
458 | 425 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
917 | 884 | |||||||
Current deferred income taxes |
26 | 42 | ||||||
Other current assets |
349 | 261 | ||||||
Receivable for proceeds on disposition |
376 | | ||||||
Assets held for sale |
78 | 503 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
5,257 | 4,584 | ||||||
Property, net of accumulated depreciation of $2,036 and $2,057, respectively |
1,291 | 1,380 | ||||||
Trademarks and other identifiable intangibles, net |
247 | 282 | ||||||
Goodwill |
592 | 624 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
145 | 260 | ||||||
Pension asset |
354 | 265 | ||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
223 | 236 | ||||||
Noncurrent assets held for sale |
77 | 1,902 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 8,186 | $ | 9,533 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities and Equity |
||||||||
Notes payable |
$ | 122 | $ | 238 | ||||
Accounts payable |
728 | 875 | ||||||
Income taxes payable and current deferred taxes |
594 | 468 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
1,176 | 1,576 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
390 | 473 | ||||||
Liabilities held for sale |
70 | 492 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
3,080 | 4,122 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-term debt |
1,935 | 1,935 | ||||||
Pension obligation |
240 | 216 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
212 | 179 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
712 | 823 | ||||||
Noncurrent liabilities held for sale |
3 | 284 | ||||||
Contingencies and commitments (Note 12) |
||||||||
Equity |
||||||||
Sara Lee common stockholders equity |
2,004 | 1,945 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
| 29 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Equity |
2,004 | 1,974 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 8,186 | $ | 9,533 | |||||
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
SARA LEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Income
For the Quarter and Six Months ended December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011
(Unaudited)
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||
In millions, except per share data |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||
Continuing Operations |
||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 2,081 | $ | 1,958 | $ | 4,024 | $ | 3,685 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cost of sales |
1,385 | 1,281 | 2,712 | 2,438 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
497 | 463 | 952 | 872 | ||||||||||||
Net charges for exit activities, asset and business dispositions |
84 | 39 | 116 | 43 | ||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
14 | | 32 | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
101 | 175 | 212 | 332 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
29 | 28 | 59 | 62 | ||||||||||||
Interest income |
(11 | ) | (7 | ) | (20 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||||||
Debt extinguishment costs |
| 25 | | 55 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
83 | 129 | 173 | 227 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
50 | 41 | 174 | 78 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
33 | 88 | (1 | ) | 149 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Discontinued operations |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from discontinued operations net of tax expense (benefit) of $(70), $(199), $(132) and $(174) |
65 | 255 | (208 | ) | 299 | |||||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations, net of tax expense of $169, $396, $339 and $562 |
371 | 490 | 463 | 579 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income from discontinued operations |
436 | 745 | 255 | 878 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
469 | 833 | 254 | 1,027 | ||||||||||||
Less: Income from noncontrolling interests, net of tax |
||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Sara Lee |
$ | 468 | $ | 831 | $ | 251 | $ | 1,023 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Amounts attributable to Sara Lee: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 33 | $ | 88 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 149 | |||||||
Net income from discontinued operations |
435 | 743 | 252 | 874 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income attributable to Sara Lee |
$ | 468 | $ | 831 | $ | 251 | $ | 1,023 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per share of common stock |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 0.06 | $ | 0.14 | $ | | $ | 0.23 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.79 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 1.58 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Average shares outstanding |
592 | 638 | 592 | 646 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.14 | $ | | $ | 0.23 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.79 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 1.58 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Average shares outstanding |
595 | 642 | 592 | 649 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Cash dividends declared per share of common stock |
$ | 0.115 | $ | 0.115 | $ | 0.115 | $ | 0.115 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
4
SARA LEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Equity
For the period July 3, 2010 to December 31, 2011
(Unaudited)
Sara Lee Common Stockholders Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions |
Total | Common Stock |
Capital Surplus |
Retained Earnings |
Unearned Stock |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Noncontrolling Interest |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Balances at July 3, 2010 |
$ | 1,515 | $ | 7 | $ | 17 | $ | 2,472 | $ | (97 | ) | $ | (912 | ) | $ | 28 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
1,296 | | | 1,287 | | | 9 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustments, net of tax |
332 | | | | | 332 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on qualifying cash flow hedges, net of tax |
7 | | | | | 7 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Pension/Postretirement activity, net of tax |
317 | | | | | 317 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
1,952 | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on common stock |
(278 | ) | | | (278 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid on noncontrolling interest/Other |
(5 | ) | | | | | | (5 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Disposition of noncontrolling interest |
(3 | ) | | | | | | (3 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuances |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
28 | | 19 | 9 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock option and benefit plans |
58 | | 58 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Share repurchases and retirement |
(1,313 | ) | (1 | ) | (55 | ) | (1,257 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||
ESOP tax benefit, redemptions and other |
20 | | | | 20 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balances at July 2, 2011 |
1,974 | 6 | 39 | 2,233 | (77 | ) | (256 | ) | 29 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
254 | | | 251 | | | 3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Translation adjustments, net of tax |
(128 | ) | | | | | (128 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain (loss) on qualifying cash flow hedges, net of tax |
(10 | ) | | | | | (10 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
Pension/Postretirement activity, net of tax |
(2 | ) | | | | | (2 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
114 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividends on common stock |
(69 | ) | | | (69 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid on noncontrolling interest |
(2 | ) | | | | | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Disposition of noncontrolling interest |
(29 | ) | | | | | | (29 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of noncontrolling interest |
(10 | ) | | (9 | ) | | | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock issuances |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restricted stock |
(15 | ) | | (8 | ) | (7 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock option and benefit plans |
39 | | 39 | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
ESOP tax benefit, redemptions and other |
2 | | (3 | ) | | 5 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Balances at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 2,004 | $ | 6 | $ | 58 | $ | 2,408 | $ | (72 | ) | $ | (396 | ) | $ | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive income was $1.206 billion in the first six months of 2011, of which $1.202 billion was attributable to Sara Lee.
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
SARA LEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months ended December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011
(Unaudited)
Six Months ended | ||||||||
In millions |
December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2011 |
||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 254 | $ | 1,027 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
122 | 155 | ||||||
Amortization |
20 | 42 | ||||||
Impairment charges |
417 | | ||||||
Net (gain) loss on business dispositions |
(802 | ) | (1,141 | ) | ||||
Pension contributions, net of expense |
(127 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||
Increase in deferred income taxes for unremitted earnings |
33 | 227 | ||||||
Increase (decrease) in deferred income taxes for tax basis differences |
80 | (227 | ) | |||||
Debt extinguishment costs |
| 55 | ||||||
Other |
45 | (19 | ) | |||||
Changes in current assets and liabilities, net of businesses acquired and sold |
||||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
12 | 8 | ||||||
Inventories |
(115 | ) | (115 | ) | ||||
Other current assets |
(37 | ) | (60 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
(10 | ) | 16 | |||||
Accrued liabilities |
(7 | ) | (12 | ) | ||||
Accrued taxes |
148 | 283 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash from operating activities |
33 | 233 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(128 | ) | (151 | ) | ||||
Purchases of software and other intangibles |
(19 | ) | (11 | ) | ||||
Acquisitions of businesses |
(29 | ) | (31 | ) | ||||
Dispositions of businesses and investments |
1,451 | 1,988 | ||||||
Cash received from derivative transactions |
25 | 36 | ||||||
Sales of assets |
1 | 9 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash received from investing activities |
1,301 | 1,840 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Issuances of common stock |
36 | 2 | ||||||
Purchases of common stock |
| (645 | ) | |||||
Borrowings of other debt |
142 | 935 | ||||||
Repayments of other debt and derivatives |
(242 | ) | (1,278 | ) | ||||
Net change in financing with less than 90-day maturities |
(197 | ) | 216 | |||||
Purchase of noncontrolling interest |
(10 | ) | | |||||
Payments of dividends |
(135 | ) | (217 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(406 | ) | (987 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Effect of changes in foreign exchange rates on cash |
(243 | ) | 110 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Increase in cash and equivalents |
685 | 1,196 | ||||||
Add: Cash balances of discontinued operations at beginning of year |
| | ||||||
Less: Cash balances of discontinued operations at end of period |
| | ||||||
Cash and equivalents at beginning of year |
2,066 | 955 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and equivalents at end of quarter |
$ | 2,751 | $ | 2,151 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Supplemental Cash Flow Data: |
||||||||
Cash paid for restructuring actions |
$ | 146 | $ | 51 | ||||
Cash contributions to pension plans |
121 | 34 | ||||||
Cash paid for income taxes |
120 | 183 |
See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
6
SARA LEE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. | Basis of Presentation |
The consolidated financial statements for the quarter and six months ended December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011 have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of Sara Lee Corporation (corporation or company), these financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, operating results, and cash flows. The results of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full fiscal year. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 2, 2011 has been derived from the corporations audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011. The fresh bakery, refrigerated dough and foodservice beverage businesses in North America as well as the international household and body care and European bakery businesses are presented as discontinued operations in the corporations consolidated financial statements. See Note 6 Discontinued Operations for additional information regarding these discontinued operations. Unless stated otherwise, any reference to income statement items in these financial statements refers to results from continuing operations.
The interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although the corporation believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and certain financial statement disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the corporations Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011 and other financial information filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These financial statements consider subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
The corporations fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to June 30. Fiscal 2012 ends on June 30, 2012. The second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012 ended on December 31, 2011 and the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2011 ended on January 1, 2011. Each of the quarters was a thirteen-week period and each of the six month periods was a twenty-six week period. Fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 are both 52-week years. Unless otherwise stated, references to years relate to fiscal years.
In January 2011, the corporation announced that its board of directors has agreed in principle to divide the company into two separate, publicly traded companies which is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2012. Under the current plan, the international coffee and tea business will be spun-off, tax-free, into a new public company (spin-off). The other company will primarily consist of Sara Lees current North American retail, foodservice and specialty meats businesses. The separation plan is subject to final approval by the board of directors, other customary approvals and the receipt of an IRS tax ruling.
In conjunction with this planned separation, the board of directors intends to declare a $3.00 per share dividend on the corporations common stock. This special dividend is expected to be declared and paid in the fourth quarter of 2012.
2. | Net Income (Loss) Per Share |
The computation of net income per share only includes results attributable to Sara Lee and does not include earnings related to noncontrolling interests. Net income per share basic is computed by dividing net income attributable to Sara Lee by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period. Net income per share diluted reflects the potential dilution that could occur if options or fixed awards to be issued under stock-based compensation awards were converted into common stock. For the quarter and six months ended December 31, 2011, options to purchase 2.4 million shares of the corporations common stock had exercise prices that were greater than the average market price of those shares during the respective reporting periods. For the quarter and six months ended January 1, 2011, options to purchase 12.1 million shares of the corporations common stock had exercise prices that were greater than the average market price of those shares during the respective reporting periods. For the six months ended December 31, 2011, the dilutive effect of stock option and award plans was excluded from the earnings per share calculation on a year-to-date basis as they would be anti-dilutive given the loss in the period.
7
The average shares outstanding declined in the second quarter and first six months of 2012 as compared to the second quarter and first six months of 2011 as a result of shares repurchased in 2011. During 2011, the corporation repurchased 80.2 million shares of common stock for $1.3 billion, a significant portion of which were repurchased after the end of the second quarter of 2011. As of December 31, 2011, the corporation was authorized to repurchase approximately $1.2 billion of common stock under its existing share repurchase program, plus 13.5 million shares of common stock that remain authorized for repurchase under the corporations prior share repurchase program. The corporation repurchases common stock at times management deems appropriate. However, the corporation does not expect to continue with any further share repurchases.
The following is a reconciliation of net income (loss) to net income (loss) per share basic and diluted for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 and 2011 (per share amounts are rounded and may not add to total):
Computation of Net Income per Common Share
(In millions, except per share data)
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
|||||||||||||
Amounts attributable to Sara Lee |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 33 | $ | 88 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 149 | |||||||
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax |
435 | 743 | 252 | 874 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 468 | $ | 831 | $ | 251 | $ | 1,023 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Average shares outstanding Basic |
592 | 638 | 592 | 646 | ||||||||||||
Dilutive effect of stock option and award plans |
3 | 4 | | 3 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Diluted shares outstanding |
595 | 642 | 592 | 649 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per common share Basic |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 0.06 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.23 | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
0.74 | 1.16 | 0.43 | 1.35 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.79 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 1.58 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Earnings per common share Diluted |
||||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.14 | $ | 0.00 | $ | 0.23 | ||||||||
Income from discontinued operations |
0.73 | 1.16 | 0.43 | 1.35 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.79 | $ | 1.30 | $ | 0.42 | $ | 1.58 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. | Segment Information |
The following is a general description of the corporations four business segments:
| North American Retail sells a variety of packaged meat and frozen bakery products to retail customers in North America. The business segment also includes the corporations U.S. Senseo retail coffee business, which the company previously announced that it plans to exit by March 2012. |
| North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats sells a variety of meat and bakery products to foodservice customers and sells gourmet sausage and other meats to retail customers in North America. |
| Coffee & Tea (formerly International Beverage) sells coffee and tea products in major markets around the world, including Europe, Brazil and Australia. |
| Australian Bakery (formerly International Bakery) sells a variety of frozen bakery and other dessert items in Australia and New Zealand. |
Beginning in 2012, the results for the companys Aidells gourmet sausage business and Gallo Salame business are being reported as part of the North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats segment (formerly North American Foodservice). These businesses were previously reported under the North American Retail segment. In conjunction with the North American segmentation changes, the corporation moved $39 million of goodwill from the North American Retail segment to the North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats segment and determined that no goodwill impairment was necessary.
The results of the North American foodservice beverage business (formerly reported under the North American Foodservice segment) and the results of the European bakery operations (formerly reported under the International Bakery segment) are being reported as part of the results of discontinued operations. See Note 6 Discontinued Operations for additional information. Prior year results have been revised to reflect the current years presentation.
8
The following is a summary of net sales and operating segment income by business segment:
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Second Quarter 2012 |
Second Quarter 2011 |
Six Months 2012 |
Six Months 2011 |
||||||||||||
North American Retail |
$ | 741 | $ | 741 | $ | 1,425 | $ | 1,436 | ||||||||
North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats |
314 | 290 | 621 | 564 | ||||||||||||
Coffee & Tea |
998 | 899 | 1,920 | 1,627 | ||||||||||||
Australian Bakery |
35 | 35 | 73 | 71 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total business segments |
2,088 | 1,965 | 4,039 | 3,698 | ||||||||||||
Intersegment sales |
(7 | ) | (7 | ) | (15 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 2,081 | $ | 1,958 | $ | 4,024 | $ | 3,685 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income Before Income Taxes | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Second Quarter 2012 |
Second Quarter 2011 |
Six Months 2012 |
Six Months 2011 |
||||||||||||
North American Retail |
$ | 81 | $ | 84 | $ | 123 | $ | 144 | ||||||||
North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats |
33 | 38 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||
Coffee & Tea |
140 | 109 | 254 | 199 | ||||||||||||
Australian Bakery |
3 | (1 | ) | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating segment income |
257 | 230 | 442 | 405 | ||||||||||||
General corporate expenses |
(168 | ) | (50 | ) | (228 | ) | (77 | ) | ||||||||
Mark-to-market derivative gains/(losses) |
15 | (2 | ) | 4 | 10 | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
101 | 175 | 212 | 332 | ||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
(18 | ) | (21 | ) | (39 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||
Debt extinguishment costs |
| (25 | ) | | (55 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 83 | $ | 129 | $ | 173 | $ | 227 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As previously noted, Aidells and Gallo Salame were moved from the North American Retail segment to the North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats segment. Segment assets have also been revised to reflect the assets of the North American foodservice beverage and European bakery businesses as net assets held for sale. A summary of the segment assets as of December 31, 2011 and July 2, 2011 is as follows:
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
July 2, 2011 |
||||||
North American Retail1 |
$ | 1,263 | $ | 1,313 | ||||
North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats |
475 | 499 | ||||||
Coffee & Tea |
2,220 | 2,334 | ||||||
Australian Bakery |
62 | 66 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total business segments |
4,020 | 4,212 | ||||||
Net assets held for sale |
155 | 2,405 | ||||||
Other2 |
4,011 | 2,916 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total Assets |
$ | 8,186 | $ | 9,533 | ||||
|
|
|
|
1 | Certain fixed assets in the North American Retail segment also support production within the North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats segment. However, the corporation does not allocate these shared assets across segments. |
2 | Principally cash and cash equivalents, certain corporate fixed assets, deferred tax assets and certain other noncurrent assets. |
9
4. | Business Acquisitions and Trademark Investment |
In December 2011, the company acquired CoffeeCompany, a leading Dutch café store operator in the Netherlands; Tea Forte, a producer of ultra premium teas that are marketed world wide; and a portion of House of Coffee, a leading foodservice provider of coffee and tea products in Norway and Denmark for a total of $29 million plus a performance-based contingent purchase price payment up to $7 million. The majority of the House of Coffee business was acquired by the companys Norwegian joint venture partner, Kaffehuset Friele, in which the company holds a 45-percent minority interest. These acquisitions have added approximately $17 million to goodwill, which will likely be adjusted once the purchase accounting for these acquisitions is finalized.
Subsequent to the end of the second quarter of 2012, the company agreed to pay 115 million to Philips Electronics (Philips) to acquire their ownership interest in the Senseo coffee trademark. This acquisition will provide Sara Lee with full ownership of the Senseo trademark, which was previously co-owned with Philips. The trademark asset will be amortized over a 20 year life beginning in the third quarter of 2012. The company also expects to pay an additional 55 million to Philips in the third quarter to terminate the prior Senseo coffee equipment manufacturing agreement and to reimburse Philips for other project costs and it is expected that the majority of these payments will be expensed.
5. | Impairment and Other Charges |
The company recognized impairment charges of $32 million in the first six months of 2012, all of which related to the writedown of capitalized computer software which were no longer determined to have any future use by the company. Of the total impairment charge, $14 million ($10 million after tax) was recognized in the second quarter of 2012 as part of general corporate expenses. The significant impairments are reported on the Impairment Charges line of the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income. The related tax benefit is determined using the statutory tax rates for the tax jurisdiction in which the impairment occurred.
In 2012, the company incurred property and business interruption losses and other charges associated with a flood at our coffee facility in Thailand. The company incurred $2.5 million of losses in the period which will not be covered by insurance. The majority of these charges were recognized as part of general corporate expense.
6. | Discontinued Operations |
The businesses that formerly comprised the North American Fresh Bakery and the International Household and Body Care segments; as well as the refrigerated dough and foodservice beverage operations in North America, which were previously reported as part of the North American Foodservice segment; and the European bakery operations, which were previously reported as part of the International Bakery segment are classified as discontinued operations and are presented in a separate line in the Consolidated Statements of Income for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities for the businesses to be sold meet the accounting criteria to be classified as held for sale and have been aggregated and reported on a separate line of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet for all periods presented.
North American Operations:
On November 9, 2010, the corporation signed an agreement to sell its North American fresh bakery business to Grupo Bimbo for $959 million, which included the assumption of $34 million of debt. The sale also includes a small portion of business that is part of the North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats segment which is not reflected as discontinued operations as it does not meet the definition of a component pursuant to the accounting rules. On October 21, 2011, the company announced an agreement with Grupo Bimbo and the Department of Justice that allowed the parties to complete the sale. It included certain remedies requiring Grupo Bimbo to divest certain brands, assets and perpetual rights in various regions, which resulted in a reduction of the purchase price to $709 million. The transaction closed on November 4, 2011 and Sara Lee received $717 million, which included working capital and other purchase price adjustments. The company entered into a customary transition services agreement with the purchaser of this business to provide for the orderly separation of the business and transition of various administrative functions and processes. The services agreement is for a period of one year but may be extended up to an additional two years.
10
The buyer of the North American Fresh Bakery business assumed all the pension and postretirement medical liabilities associated with these businesses, including any multi-employer pension liabilities. An actuarial analysis under ERISA guidelines is being performed to determine the final plan assets that should be transferred to support the pension liabilities assumed by the buyer. The actuarial analysis, which is expected to be completed during the third quarter of 2012, may result in an adjustment to the funded status of the pension plans transferred to the buyer, which would result in an adjustment to the purchase price but not impact the gain on sale. The transfer of the benefit plan liabilities to the buyer resulted in the recognition of a $34 million settlement loss related to the defined benefit pension plans and a $71 million settlement gain and a $44 million curtailment gain related to the postretirement benefit plans. These amounts, which are subject to change based on the final actuarial analysis, have been included in the gain on disposition of this business.
In the first quarter of 2012, steps were taken to market and dispose of the North American foodservice beverage business. As such, the results of this component are classified as discontinued operations in the Condensed Consolidated Income Statement and the net assets are reported as available for sale on the consolidated balance sheet for all periods presented. On October 24, 2011, the company announced that it had entered into an agreement to sell the majority of its North American foodservice beverage operations to the J.M. Smucker Company (Smuckers) for $350 million and the transaction closed on December 31, 2011 resulting in a pretax gain of $222 million. The company received $376 million of proceeds, which included a working capital adjustment, shortly after the end of the quarter. As a result, the company established a receivable for the proceeds which is reported in the current asset section of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2011. The company entered into a customary transition services agreement with Smuckers to provide for the orderly separation of the business and the transition of various administrative functions and processes. Sara Lee also entered into a 10 year partnership to collaborate on liquid coffee innovation that will pay Sara Lee approximately $50 million plus growth-related royalties over the 10 year period. While this arrangement will provide a continuation of cash flows subsequent to the divestiture, it does not represent significant continuing cash flows or significant continuing involvement that would preclude classification of the North American foodservice beverage component as a discontinued operation. The company performed an updated impairment analysis for the remaining assets for sale in North American Foodservice beverage and recognized a pretax impairment charge of $6 million in the second quarter to 2012 which has been recognized in the operating results for discontinued operations. The company has also recognized exit related costs for this business which is included in the operating results for discontinued operations. Once the transition services agreement with Smuckers is complete and any residual assets of the North American Foodservice Beverage component are sold, additional exit related costs are expected to be recognized.
In the fourth quarter of 2011, steps were taken to market and dispose of the North American refrigerated dough business. On August 9, 2011, the company announced it had entered into an agreement to sell its North American refrigerated dough business to Ralcorp for $545 million. Although the transaction closed in the first quarter of 2012, the company did not receive the $552 million of proceeds, which included working capital adjustments, until the second quarter of 2012. The corporation entered into a customary transitional services agreement with the purchaser of this business to provide for the orderly separation of the business and the orderly transition of various functions and processes.
International Operations:
In the third quarter of 2011, management indicated that its International Bakery operations were under strategic review. The asset disposal groups comprising the International Bakery operations were tested for impairment under the held and used model in 2011 and it was determined no impairment was necessary. During the first quarter of 2012, management decided to divest the Spanish bakery and French refrigerated dough businesses, collectively referred to as European bakery, requiring that these businesses be tested for impairment under the available for sale model. Based on a first quarter 2012 estimate of the anticipated proceeds for these businesses, the corporation recognized a pretax impairment charge of $371 million for the Spanish bakery and French refrigerated dough businesses. In the second quarter of 2012, the impairment was increased by $8 million resulting in a total impairment charge of $379 million in 2012. A tax benefit of $38 million was recognized on these impairment charges. On October 10, 2011, the company announced that it had signed an agreement to sell the Spanish bakery business to Grupo Bimbo for 115 million and closed the transaction in the second quarter, recognizing a pretax gain of $15 million. In the second quarter of 2012, the corporation announced that it was considering a binding offer for the sale of the French refrigerated dough business for 115 million. The disposition of this business closed in the third quarter of 2012.
The company entered into an agreement to sell all of its non-Indian insecticides business for 154 million to SC Johnson and received a deposit of 152 million in December 2010 on the sale of these businesses. Due to competition concerns raised by the European Commission, the two parties abandoned the transaction as originally agreed but were able to complete the sale of the insecticides businesses outside the European Union (Malaysia, Singapore, Kenya and Russia) as
11
well as a limited number of businesses inside the European Union in 2012. The company also divested the remaining insecticides businesses inside the European Union to another buyer and transferred the net proceeds received from the divestiture of those businesses to SC Johnson. The company recognized a pretax gain of $256 million on the dispositions. The company will no longer recognize any revenues related to the insecticides business after the end of the second quarter of 2012.
In May 2011, the company completed the sale of the majority of its shoe care businesses. Certain other shoe care businesses were to be sold on a delayed basis. In the first six months of 2012, the company closed on the sale of its shoe care business in Malaysia and China and received $54 million of proceeds, which included working capital adjustments.
In July 2010, the company sold a majority of its air care products business. When this business was sold, certain operations were retained in Spain, until production related to non-air care businesses ceases at the facility. The transaction closed subsequent to the end of the second quarter and as such, the final gain on the sale of this facility will be recognized in the third quarter of 2012.
The following is a summary of the operating results of the corporations discontinued operations:
Second Quarter 2012 | Second Quarter 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Net Sales |
Pretax Income (Loss) |
Net Income (Loss) |
Net Sales |
Pretax Income (Loss) |
Net Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||||
North American Fresh Bakery |
$ | 195 | $ | 8 | $ | 74 | $ | 487 | $ | 2 | $ | 229 | ||||||||||||
North American Foodservice Beverage |
165 | (5 | ) | (6 | ) | 146 | 6 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||
North American Refrigerated Dough |
| | | 95 | 19 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
European Bakery |
115 | (11 | ) | (4 | ) | 150 | 6 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
International Household and Body Care |
40 | 3 | 1 | 365 | 23 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 515 | $ | (5 | ) | $ | 65 | $ | 1,243 | $ | 56 | $ | 255 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
First Six Months 2012 | First Six Months 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Net Sales |
Pretax Income (Loss) |
Net Income (Loss) |
Net Sales |
Pretax Income (Loss) |
Net Income (Loss) |
||||||||||||||||||
North American Fresh Bakery |
$ | 724 | $ | 29 | $ | 144 | $ | 1,004 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 227 | |||||||||||
North American Foodservice Beverage |
302 | (5 | ) | (3 | ) | 257 | 5 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||
North American Refrigerated Dough |
74 | 13 | 9 | 166 | 28 | 18 | ||||||||||||||||||
European Bakery |
263 | (385 | ) | (360 | ) | 300 | 12 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||
International Household and Body Care |
109 | 8 | 2 | 772 | 81 | 43 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,472 | $ | (340 | ) | $ | (208 | ) | $ | 2,499 | $ | 125 | $ | 299 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first six months of 2012, the results of the discontinued operations includes a $189 million tax benefit ($71 million for the quarter) related to tax basis differences associated with the North American Fresh Bakery assets.
The following is a summary of the gain on sale of the corporations discontinued operations:
Second Quarter 2012 | First Six Months 2012 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Pretax Gain on Sale |
Tax (Expense) Benefit |
After Tax Gain |
Pretax Gain on Sale |
Tax (Expense) Benefit |
After
Tax Gain |
||||||||||||||||||
North American Fresh Bakery |
$ | 105 | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 68 | $ | 105 | $ | (37 | ) | $ | 68 | ||||||||||
North American Foodsrv. Beverage |
222 | (77 | ) | 145 | 222 | (77 | ) | 145 | ||||||||||||||||
North American Refrigerated Dough |
| | | 198 | (158 | ) | 40 | |||||||||||||||||
European Bakery |
15 | (5 | ) | 10 | 15 | (5 | ) | 10 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-European insecticides |
196 | (44 | ) | 152 | 256 | (56 | ) | 200 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Household and Body Care |
2 | (6 | ) | (4 | ) | 6 | (6 | ) | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 540 | $ | (169 | ) | $ | 371 | $ | 802 | $ | (339 | ) | $ | 463 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Second Quarter 2011 | First Six Months 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Pretax Gain on Sale |
Tax (Expense) Benefit |
After
Tax Gain |
Pretax Gain on Sale |
Tax (Expense) Benefit |
After Tax Gain |
||||||||||||||||||
Air Care Products |
$ | 15 | $ | (13 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 270 | $ | (179 | ) | $ | 91 | ||||||||||
Body Care and European Detergents |
870 | (383 | ) | 487 | 870 | (383 | ) | 487 | ||||||||||||||||
Other Household and Body Care |
1 | | 1 | 1 | | 1 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 886 | $ | (396 | ) | 490 | $ | 1,141 | $ | (562 | ) | $ | 579 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12
In 2012, the $158 million tax expense recognized on the sale of the North American refrigerated dough business was impacted by $254 million of goodwill that had no tax basis. The tax expense recognized in 2011 on the sale of Air Care Products includes a $77 million charge related to the anticipated repatriation of the cash proceeds received on the disposition of this business.
The following is a summary of the net assets held for sale as of December 31, 2011 and July 2, 2011:
(In millions) |
Dec.
31, 2011 |
July 2, 2011 |
||||||
Trade accounts receivable |
$ | 36 | $ | 273 | ||||
Inventories |
36 | 176 | ||||||
Other current assets |
6 | 54 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets held for sale |
78 | 503 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Property |
54 | 825 | ||||||
Trademarks and other intangibles |
| 303 | ||||||
Goodwill |
| 800 | ||||||
Other assets |
23 | (26 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Assets held for sale |
$ | 155 | $ | 2,405 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 22 | $ | 213 | ||||
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities |
48 | 263 | ||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
| 16 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities held for sale |
70 | 492 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
| 80 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
3 | 204 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Liabilities held for sale |
$ | 73 | $ | 776 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Noncontrolling interest |
$ | | $ | 29 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The discontinued operations cash flows are summarized in the table below:
(In millions) Increase / (Decrease) |
Six
Months ended Dec. 31, 2011 |
Six
Months ended Jan. 1, 2011 |
||||||
Cash flow from operating activities |
$ | (46 | ) | $ | 199 | |||
Cash flow from (used in) investing activities |
1,424 | 1,940 | ||||||
Cash flow from (used in) financing activities |
(1,378 | ) | (2,139 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Increase (decrease) in net cash of discontinued operations |
| | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year |
| | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | | $ | | ||||
|
|
|
|
The net cash received from investing activities in 2012 primarily represents the cash proceeds received on the sale of the North American fresh bakery and refrigerated dough businesses. The net cash received from investing activities in 2011 primarily represents the cash proceeds received on the sale of the air care business. The cash used in financing activities in 2011 primarily represents the net transfers of cash with the corporate office. The net assets of the discontinued operations assumes that the cash of those businesses has been retained as a corporate asset.
7. | Debt Issuances and Redemptions |
On September 7, 2010, the corporation completed a tender offer for any and all of its 6 1/4 % Notes due September 15, 2011, of which $1.11 billion aggregate principal amount was outstanding. At the time of expiration of the tender offer, $653.3 million of the 6 1/4% notes had been validly tendered. The corporation recognized a $30 million charge associated with the early extinguishment of this debt, which is reported on the Debt extinguishment costs line of the Consolidated Income Statement. On October 8, 2010, the corporation redeemed the remaining $456.7 million of aggregate principal outstanding of the 6 1/4% Notes, which resulted in $25 million of additional debt extinguishment charges in the second quarter of 2011.
8. | Exit, Disposal and Other Restructuring Activities |
In January 2011, the corporation announced that its board of directors had agreed in principle to divide the company into two separate, publicly traded companies which is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2012. Under this plan, the corporations international coffee and tea operations will be spun-off, tax-free, into a new public company. As the corporation prepares for the spin-off, it will incur certain spin-off related costs. Spin-off related costs will include restructuring actions such as employee termination costs and costs related to terminating contractual agreements; third party professional fees for consulting and other services that are directly related to the spin-off; and the costs of employees solely dedicated to activities directly related to the spin-off.
13
In 2009, the corporation initiated Project Accelerate, which was a series of global initiatives designed to drive significant savings over a three year period. The overall cost of the initiatives included severance costs as well as transition costs associated with transferring services to an outside third party. The Project Accelerate initiative was substantially completed as of the end of 2011.
The nature of the costs incurred under these plans includes the following:
1) Exit Activities, Asset and Business Disposition Actions These amounts primarily relate to:
| Employee termination costs |
| Lease exit and other contract termination costs |
| Gains or losses on the disposition of assets or asset groupings that do not qualify as discontinued operations |
2) Costs recognized in Cost of sales and Selling, general and administrative expenses primarily relate to:
| Expenses associated with the installation of new information systems |
| Costs to retain and relocate employees |
| Consulting costs |
| Costs associated with the transition of services to an outside third party vendor as part of a business process outsourcing initiative |
Certain of these costs are recognized in Cost of sales or Selling, general and administrative expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Income as they do not qualify for treatment as an exit activity or asset and business disposition under the accounting rules for exit and disposal activities. However, management believes the disclosure of these charges provides the reader greater transparency to the total cost of the initiatives.
The following is a summary of the (income) expense associated with new and ongoing actions, which also highlights where the costs are reflected in the Consolidated Statements of Income along with the impact on diluted EPS:
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec.
31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec.
31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses: |
$ | 41 | $ | 4 | $ | 77 | $ | 6 | ||||||||
Net charges for: |
||||||||||||||||
Exit activities, asset and business dispositions |
84 | 39 | 116 | 43 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Decrease in income from continuing operations before income taxes |
125 | 43 | 193 | 49 | ||||||||||||
Income tax benefit (at applicable statutory rates) |
(35 | ) | (11 | ) | (53 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Decrease in income from continuing operations |
$ | 90 | $ | 32 | $ | 140 | $ | 36 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Impact on diluted EPS |
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.05 | $ | 0.24 | $ | 0.05 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The impact of these actions on the corporations business segments and unallocated corporate expenses is summarized as follows:
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||
North American Retail |
$ | 1 | $ | | $ | 9 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats |
| | 1 | | ||||||||||||
Coffee & Tea |
4 | 33 | 13 | 35 | ||||||||||||
Australian Bakery |
| | | | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Decrease in operating segment income |
5 | 33 | 23 | 36 | ||||||||||||
Increase in general corporate expenses |
120 | 10 | 170 | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
$ | 125 | $ | 43 | $ | 193 | $ | 49 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following discussion provides information concerning the exit, disposal and other activities for each year where actions were initiated and material reserves exist.
14
2012 Actions
During 2012, the corporation approved certain actions related to exit, disposal, and spin-off activities and recognized charges of $196 million related to these actions. Each of these activities is expected to be completed within a 12-month period after being approved and include the following:
| Recognized a charge to implement a plan to terminate approximately 420 employees, related to the North American Retail, Coffee & Tea and corporate office operations and provide them with severance benefits in accordance with benefit plans previously communicated to the affected employee group or with local employment laws. Of the 420 targeted employees, approximately 170 employees have been terminated. The remaining employees are expected to be terminated within the next 12 months. |
| Recognized costs associated with renegotiating global IT contracts and spin-off related advisory fees. |
The following table summarizes the net charges taken for the exit, disposal and spin-off activities approved during 2012 and the related status of the related accruals as of December 31, 2011. The accrued amounts remaining represent cash expenditures necessary to satisfy remaining obligations. The majority of the cash payments to satisfy the accrued costs are expected to be paid in the next 12 months. The company expects to recognize approximately $525 million - $550 million of charges related to continuing and discontinued operations for restructuring actions, other spin-off related activities, and other significant items such as accelerated depreciation on fixed assets and litigation accruals. Of this amount, approximately $480 million - $505 million relates to various exit, disposal and other restructuring actions which are included within the scope of this disclosure.
(In millions) |
Employee termination and other benefits |
IT and
other costs |
Non- cancellable leases/ Contractual obligations |
Total | ||||||||||||
Exit, disposal and other costs recognized during 2012 |
$ | 33 | $ | 76 | $ | 87 | $ | 196 | ||||||||
Charges recognized in discontinued operations |
19 | 17 | | 36 | ||||||||||||
Cash payments |
(13 | ) | (60 | ) | (7 | ) | (80 | ) | ||||||||
Noncash charges |
| (5 | ) | | (5 | ) | ||||||||||
Foreign exchange impacts |
(1 | ) | | | (1 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Accrued costs as of December 31, 2011 |
$ | 38 | $ | 28 | $ | 80 | $ | 146 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2011 Actions
During 2011, the corporation approved certain actions related to exit, disposal, Project Accelerate and spin-off activities and recognized charges of $141 million related to these actions. Each of these activities was expected to be completed within a 12-month period after being approved and include the following:
| Recognized a charge to implement a plan to terminate approximately 960 employees, related to the European beverage, North American Retail and North American Foodservice businesses and the corporate office operations and provide them with severance benefits in accordance with benefit plans previously communicated to the affected employee group or with local employment laws. Of the 960 targeted employees, approximately 500 have been terminated. The remaining employees are expected to be terminated within the next 12 months. |
| Recognized costs associated with the transition of services to an outside third party vendor as part of a business process outsourcing initiative. |
| Recognized third party and employee costs associated with the planned spin-off of the corporations international coffee and tea operations. |
The corporation also recognized $100 million of charges in discontinued operations primarily related to restructuring actions taken to eliminate stranded overhead associated with the household and body care businesses.
The following table summarizes the significant actions completed during the first six months of 2012 and the related status of the related accruals as of December 31, 2011. The accrued amounts remaining represent those cash expenditures necessary to satisfy remaining obligations. The majority of the cash payments to satisfy the accrued costs are expected to be paid in the next 12 months.
(In millions) |
Employee termination and other benefits |
IT and
other costs |
Non- cancellable leases/ Contractual obligations |
Total | ||||||||||||
Accrued costs as of July 2, 2011 |
$ | 100 | $ | 24 | $ | 9 | $ | 133 | ||||||||
Cash payments |
(37 | ) | (22 | ) | (9 | ) | (68 | ) | ||||||||
Change in estimate |
(7 | ) | | | (7 | ) | ||||||||||
Noncash charges |
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | | (4 | ) | |||||||||
Foreign exchange impacts |
(6 | ) | | | (6 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Accrued costs as of December 31, 2011 |
$ | 47 | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | 48 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
2010 Actions
During 2010, the corporation approved certain actions related to exit, disposal, and Project Accelerate activities and recognized charges of $85 million related to these actions. Each of these activities was expected to be completed within a 12-month period after being approved and include the following:
| Recognized a charge to implement a plan to terminate approximately 900 employees, related to European beverage and North American foodservice operations, and provide them with severance benefits in accordance with benefit plans previously communicated to the affected employee group or with local employment laws. Of the 900 targeted employees, 40 employees have not yet been terminated, but are expected to be terminated within the next 12 months. |
| Recognized costs associated with the transition of services to an outside third party vendor as part of a business process outsourcing initiative. |
The following table summarizes the significant actions completed during the first six months of 2012 and the status of the remaining accruals related to the 2010 actions as of December 31, 2011. The accrued amounts remaining represent those cash expenditures necessary to satisfy remaining obligations. The majority of the cash payments to satisfy the accrued costs are expected to be paid in the next 12 months. The corporation does not anticipate any additional material future charges related to the 2010 actions. The composition of these charges and the remaining accruals are summarized as follows:
(In millions) |
Employee termination and other benefits |
|||
Accrued costs as of July 2, 2011 |
$ | 19 | ||
Cash payments |
(5 | ) | ||
Noncash charges |
(2 | ) | ||
Change in estimate |
(1 | ) | ||
Foreign exchange impacts |
(1 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Accrued costs as of December 31, 2011 |
$ | 10 | ||
|
|
In periods prior to 2010, the corporation had approved and completed various actions to exit certain defined business activities and lower its cost structure and these actions have had minimal impact on current year results. As of December 31, 2011, the accrued liabilities remaining in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet related to these completed actions total $18 million and primarily represent certain severance obligations. These accrued amounts are expected to be satisfied in cash and will be funded from operations.
9. | Financial Instruments |
Background Information
The corporation uses derivative financial instruments, including forward exchange, futures, options and swap contracts, to manage its exposures to foreign exchange, commodity prices and interest rate risks. The use of these derivative financial instruments modifies the exposure of these risks with the intent to reduce the risk or cost to the corporation. The corporation does not use derivatives for trading or speculative purposes and is not a party to leveraged derivatives. More information concerning accounting for financial instruments can be found in Note 2, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the companys 2011 Annual Report.
Types of Derivative Instruments
Interest Rate and Cross Currency Swaps
The corporation utilizes interest rate swap derivatives to manage interest rate risk, in order to maintain a targeted amount of both fixed-rate and floating-rate long term debt and notes payable. Interest rate swap agreements that are effective at hedging the fair value of fixed-rate debt agreements are designated and accounted for as fair value hedges. The corporation has a fixed interest rate on approximately 88% of long-term debt and notes payable issued.
The corporation has issued certain foreign-denominated debt instruments and utilizes cross currency swaps to reduce the variability of functional currency cash flows related to the foreign currency debt. Cross currency swap agreements that are effective at hedging the variability of foreign-denominated cash flows are designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges. In the first six months of 2012, the corporation paid $156 million to settle a 333 million notional value cross currency swap. This derivative instrument had effectively converted the currency base of a 2002 U.S. dollar debt issuance to euros. The cash outflow has been reflected on the Repayments of other debt and derivatives line in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
16
Currency Forward Exchange, Futures and Option Contracts
The corporation uses forward exchange and option contracts to reduce the effect of fluctuating foreign currencies on short-term foreign-currency-denominated intercompany transactions, third-party product-sourcing transactions, foreign-denominated investments (including subsidiary net assets) and other known foreign currency exposures. Gains and losses on the derivative instruments are intended to offset losses and gains on the hedged transaction in an effort to reduce the earnings volatility resulting from fluctuating foreign currency exchange rates. Forward currency exchange contracts which are effective at hedging the fair value of a recognized asset or liability are designated and accounted for as fair value hedges. Forward currency contracts that act as a hedge of changes in the underlying foreign currency denominated subsidiary net assets are accounted for as net investment hedges. All remaining currency forward and options contracts are accounted for as mark-to-market hedges. The principal currencies hedged by the corporation include the European euro, British pound, Danish kroner, Hungarian forint, U.S. dollar, Australian dollar and Brazilian real. The corporation hedges virtually all foreign exchange risk derived from recorded transactions and firm commitments and only hedges foreign exchange risk related to anticipated transactions where the exposure is potentially significant.
Commodity Futures and Options Contracts
The corporation uses commodity futures and options to hedge a portion of its commodity price risk. The principal commodities hedged by the corporation include hogs, beef, natural gas, diesel fuel, coffee, corn, wheat and other ingredients. The corporation does not use significant levels of commodity financial instruments to hedge commodity prices and primarily relies upon fixed rate supplier contracts to determine commodity pricing. In circumstances where commodity-derivative instruments are used, there is a high correlation between the commodity costs and the derivative instruments. For those instruments where the commodity instrument and underlying hedged item correlate between 80-125%, the corporation accounts for those contracts as cash flow hedges. However, the majority of commodity derivative instruments are accounted for as mark-to-market hedges. The corporation only enters into futures and options contracts that are traded on established, well-recognized exchanges that offer high liquidity, transparent pricing, daily cash settlement and collateralization through margin requirements.
Non-Derivative Instruments
The corporation uses non-derivative instruments such as non-U.S. dollar financing transactions or non-U.S. dollar assets or liabilities, including intercompany loans, to hedge the exposure of changes in underlying foreign currency denominated subsidiary net assets, and they are declared as Net Investment Hedges.
Notional Values | ||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
July 2, 2011 |
Hedge Coverage (Number of months) | |||||||
Swap Contracts: |
||||||||||
Rec. Fixed / Pay Float - Interest Rate Swap Notional |
$ | 150 | $ | 584 | 17.5 17.5 | |||||
Rec. Fixed / Pay Fixed -Cross Currency Swaps Notional(1) |
295 | 813 | 17.5 17.5 | |||||||
Foreign Currency Forward Contracts(1): |
||||||||||
Commitments to Purchase Foreign Currencies |
$ | 2,632 | $ | 2,757 | 0.2 17.6 | |||||
Commitments to Sell Foreign Currencies |
2,629 | 2,754 | 0.2 17.6 | |||||||
Commodity Contracts: |
||||||||||
Commodity Future Contracts(3) |
$ | 148 | $ | 193 | 1.0 10.0 | |||||
Commodity Options Contracts(2) |
53 | 77 | 2.0 2.0 | |||||||
Net Investment Hedges: |
$ | 4,256 | $ | 4,052 | |
1 | The notional value is calculated using the exchange rates as of reporting date. |
2 | Option contract notional values are determined by the ratio of the change in option value to the change in the underlying hedged item. |
3 | Commodity futures contracts are determined by the initial cost of the contract. |
17
Cash Flow Presentation
The settlement of derivative contracts related to the purchase of inventory, commodities or other hedged items that utilize hedge accounting are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as an operating cash flow, while those derivatives that utilize the mark-to-market hedge accounting model are reported in investing activities when those contracts are realized in cash. Fixed to floating rate swaps are reported as a component of interest expense and therefore are reported in cash flow from operating activities similar to how cash interest payments are reported. The portion of the gain or loss on a cross currency swap that offsets the change in the value of interest expense is recognized in cash flow from operations.
Contingent Features/Concentration of Credit Risk
All of the corporations derivative instruments are governed by International Swaps and Derivatives Association (i.e. ISDA) master agreements, requiring the corporation to maintain an investment grade credit rating from both Moodys and Standard & Poors credit rating agencies. If the corporations credit rating were to fall below investment grade, it would be in violation of these provisions, and the counterparties to the derivative instruments could request immediate payment or demand immediate collateralization on the derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a liability position was $66 million on December 31, 2011 and $272 million on July 2, 2011, for which the corporation has posted no collateral. If the credit-risk-related contingent features underlying these agreements were triggered on December 31, 2011 and July 2, 2011, the corporation would be required to post collateral of, at most, $66 million and $272 million, respectively, with its counterparties.
A large number of major international financial institutions are counterparties to the corporations financial instruments including cross currency swaps, interest rate swaps, and currency exchange forwards and swaps. The corporation enters into financial instrument agreements only with counterparties meeting very stringent credit standards (a credit rating of A-/A3 or better), limiting the amount of agreements or contracts it enters into with any one party and, where legally available, executing master netting agreements. These positions are continually monitored. While the corporation may be exposed to credit losses in the event of nonperformance by individual counterparties of the entire group of counterparties, it has not recognized any losses with these counterparties in the past and does not anticipate material losses in the future.
Fair Value Measurements
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., exit price) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value must be categorized into one of three different levels depending on the assumptions (i.e., inputs) used in the valuation. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value while level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. Assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input significant to the fair value measurement.
The carrying amounts of cash and equivalents, trade accounts receivables, accounts payable, derivative instruments and notes payable approximate fair values. The fair value of the corporations long-term debt, including the current portion, is estimated using discounted cash flows based on the corporations current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.
December 31, 2011 | July 2, 2011 | |||||||||||||||
(In Millions) |
Fair Value | Carrying Amount |
Fair Value | Carrying Amount |
||||||||||||
Long-term debt, including current portion |
$ | 2,375 | $ | 2,325 | $ | 2,411 | $ | 2,408 |
18
Information on the location and amounts of derivative fair values in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2011 and July 2, 2011 is as follows:
Assets | Liabilities | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Current Assets |
Other Non- current Assets |
Accrued Liabilities-Other |
Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Dec. 31, 2011 |
July 2, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
July 2, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
July 2, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
July 2, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest rate contracts (b) |
$ | | $ | | $ | 10 | $ | 12 | $ | | $ | 2 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts (b) |
130 | | | | | 191 | 39 | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts (a) |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments |
130 | | 10 | 12 | | 193 | 39 | 66 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign exchange contracts (b) |
29 | 20 | | | 24 | 13 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity contracts (a) |
| 2 | | | 3 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives not designated as Hedging instruments |
29 | 22 | | | 27 | 13 | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total derivatives |
$ | 159 | $ | 22 | $ | 10 | $ | 12 | $ | 27 | $ | 206 | $ | 39 | $ | 66 | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(a) | Categorized as level 1: Fair value of level 1 assets and liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2011 are nil and $3 million and at July 2, 2011 are $2million and nil, respectively. |
(b) | Categorized as level 2: Fair value of level 2 assets and liabilities as of Dec. 31, 2011 are $169 million and $63 million and at July 2, 2011 are $32 million and $272 million, respectively. |
Information related to our cash flow hedges, net investment hedges, fair value hedges and other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments for the periods ended December 31, 2011, and January 1, 2011, follows:
Interest Rate Contracts |
Foreign
Exchange Contracts |
Commodity Contracts |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter ended | Quarter ended | Quarter ended | Quarter ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) (a) |
$ | | $ | 4 | $ | 1 | $ | 17 | $ | 3 | $ | 11 | $ | 4 | $ | 32 | ||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings (a) (b) |
| | 11 | 13 | 1 | 3 | 12 | 16 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of ineffectiveness recognized in earnings (c) (d) |
| | | (2 | ) | | | | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months |
| | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | 1 | 8 | (3 | ) | 5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (a) |
| | 252 | 178 | | | 252 | 178 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized from OCI into earnings (f) |
| | (198 | ) | 60 | | | (198 | ) | 60 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in earnings (e) |
| | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of Hedged Item gain (loss) recognized in earnings (e) |
2 | 3 | | | | | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in Cost of Sales |
| | 20 | (2 | ) | 7 | (2 | ) | 27 | (4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain(loss) recognized in SG&A |
| | (41 | ) | (33 | ) | 5 | 1 | (36 | ) | (32 | ) |
(a) | Effective portion. |
(b) | Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings is reported in interest, for interest rate swaps, in selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses for foreign exchange contracts and in cost of sales for commodity contracts. |
(c) | Gain (loss) recognized in earnings is related to the ineffective portion and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. |
(d) | Gain (loss) recognized in earnings is reported in interest expense for foreign exchange contract and SG&A expenses for commodity contracts. |
(e) | The amount of gain (loss) recognized in earnings on the derivative contracts and the related hedged item is reported in interest for the interest rate contracts and SG&A for the foreign exchange contracts. |
(f) | The gain (loss) recognized from OCI into earnings is reported in gain on sale of discontinued operations. |
19
Interest Rate Contracts |
Foreign Exchange Contracts |
Commodity Contracts |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Six Months ended | Six Months ended | Six Months ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) | Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) (a) |
$ | | $ | 1 | $ | 197 | $ | (31 | ) | $ | 2 | $ | 17 | $ | 199 | $ | (13 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into |
| (2 | ) | 204 | (34 | ) | 4 | 3 | 208 | (33 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of ineffectiveness recognized in earnings (c) (d) |
| | (2 | ) | (4 | ) | 1 | 1 | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months |
| | (3 | ) | (1 | ) | (3 | ) | 14 | (6 | ) | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in OCI (a) |
| | 427 | (227 | ) | | | 427 | (227 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized from OCI into |
| | (207 | ) | 51 | | | (207 | ) | 51 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Derivatives: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in |
2 | 4 | | | | | 2 | 4 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of Hedged Item gain (loss) recognized in |
2 | 3 | | | | | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in Cost of Sales |
| | 15 | (19 | ) | 19 | | 34 | (19 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain(loss) recognized in SG&A |
| | (75 | ) | 31 | | 3 | (75 | ) | 34 |
(a) | Effective portion. |
(b) | Gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings is reported in interest, for interest rate swaps, in selling, general, and administrative (SG&A) expenses for foreign exchange contracts and in cost of sales for commodity contracts. |
(c) | Gain (loss) recognized in earnings is related to the ineffective portion and amounts excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. |
(d) | Gain (loss) recognized in earnings is reported in interest expense for foreign exchange contract and SG&A expenses for commodity contracts. |
(e) | The amount of gain (loss) recognized in earnings on the derivative contracts and the related hedged item is reported in interest for the interest rate contracts and SG&A for the foreign exchange contracts. |
(f) | The gain (loss) recognized from OCI into earnings is reported in gain on sale of discontinued operations. |
10. | Pension and Other Postretirement Benefit Plans |
The components of the net periodic pension cost and the postretirement medical cost (benefit) for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
Pension - U.S Plans |
Pension - International Plans |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Second Quarter 2012 |
Second Quarter 2011 |
Second Quarter 2012 |
Second Quarter 2011 |
||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 2 | $ | 2 | $ | 6 | $ | 8 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
18 | 18 | 41 | 40 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(21 | ) | (20 | ) | (54 | ) | (49 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of: |
||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (benefit) |
| | 1 | 2 | ||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss |
1 | 3 | 2 | 7 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit) |
$ | | $ | 3 | $ | (4 | ) | $ | 8 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
Pension - U.S Plans |
Pension - International Plans |
|||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
First Six Months 2012 |
First Six Months 2011 |
First Six Months 2012 |
First Six Months 2011 |
||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 4 | $ | 4 | $ | 13 | $ | 16 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
37 | 36 | 83 | 79 | ||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(41 | ) | (40 | ) | (110 | ) | (96 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of: |
||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (benefit) |
| | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Net actuarial loss |
2 | 7 | 4 | 13 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit) |
$ | 2 | $ | 7 | $ | (8 | ) | $ | 15 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Postretirement Medical
and Life Insurance |
||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Second Quarter 2012 |
Second Quarter 2011 |
Six Months 2012 |
Six Months 2011 |
||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 1 | $ | | $ | 1 | $ | 1 | ||||||||
Interest cost |
1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of: |
||||||||||||||||
Prior service cost (benefit) |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit) |
$ | (1 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (3 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The net periodic benefit costs of the defined benefit pension plans were lower in the first six months of 2012 than in 2011 due to the increase in the expected return on plan assets, which results from the higher level of plan assets as of the beginning of this fiscal year due to improved asset returns during 2011; and a reduction in the amortization of net actuarial losses due to actuarial gains recognized during 2011, which reduced the amount of unrecognized actuarial losses to be amortized as of the end of 2011.
Beginning in the second quarter of 2011, the corporation has classified the North American fresh bakery business as discontinued operations and per the sale agreement, the purchaser assumed the pension and postretirement medical obligations related to those discontinued operations. As such, the total net periodic benefit costs associated with the participants in those plans has been included in discontinued operations as these costs were not retained after these businesses were sold. In addition, the related pension and postretirement benefit plan net liabilities and/or assets have been included in assets and/or liabilities held for sale for periods prior to the date the sale closed.
The disposition of the North American fresh bakery business resulted in the recognition of the following plan settlements and curtailments: a $34 million net settlement loss related to the defined benefit pension plans; and a $71 million settlement gain and a $44 million curtailment gain related to the postretirement health-care and life insurance benefit plans. These amounts are being reported as part of the gain on disposition of businesses in discontinued operations. See Note 6 Discontinued Operations for additional information.
As of the date of disposition, the projected benefit obligations and plan assets for the benefit plans impacted by the disposition were remeasured. In total, including both continuing and discontinued operations, the remeasurement resulted in a $68 million increase in pension liability and a $13 million increase in the postretirement health-care and life insurance liability with a corresponding offset to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in the common stockholders equity section of the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet.
During the first six months of 2012 and 2011, the company contributed $121 million and $34 million, respectively, to its defined benefit pension plans. The $121 million contribution includes a 60 million contribution to the companys Dutch pension plan related to an agreement with the Dutch unions to restructure this plan. At the present time, the company expects to contribute approximately $220 million of cash to its defined benefit pension plans in 2012, of which approximately $214 million will be contributed to the international pension plans. The exact amount of cash contributions made to pension plans in any year is dependent upon a number of factors including minimum funding requirements in the jurisdictions in which the corporation operates and arrangements made with trustees of certain foreign plans. As a result, the actual funding in 2012 may differ from the current estimate.
21
11. | Income Taxes |
The following table sets out the tax expense and the effective tax rate for the corporation from continuing operations:
Second Quarter | Six Months | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
2012 | 2011 | 2012 | 2011 | ||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 83 | $ | 129 | $ | 173 | $ | 227 | ||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
50 | 41 | 174 | 78 | ||||||||||||
Effective tax rate |
60.5 | % | 31.6 | % | 100.5 | % | 34.4 | % |
Second Quarter and First Six Months of 2012
In the second quarter of 2012, the corporation recognized tax expense of $50 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $83 million, or an effective tax rate of 60.5%. The tax expense and related effective tax rate on continuing operations were impacted by recognizing $20 million of discrete tax expense associated with deferred taxes on unremitted foreign earnings.
In the first six months of 2012, the corporation recognized tax expense of $174 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $173 million, or an effective tax rate of 100.5%. The tax expense and related effective tax rate on continuing operations was determined by applying a 41.1% estimated annual effective tax rate to pretax earnings and then recognizing $103 million of discrete tax items. The discrete tax items relate to the following:
| $73 million of tax expense to establish a valuation allowance on net operating losses in France. |
| $79 million of tax expense to establish a deferred tax liability related to earnings that are no longer permanently reinvested in Spain offset by a tax benefit of $69 million primarily related to a decrease in the amount of unrecognized tax positions in Spain. |
| $20 million of tax expense associated with deferred taxes on unremitted foreign earnings. |
The corporations 2012 estimated annual effective rate increased from 34.7% in the first six months of 2011 to 41.1% due primarily to an increase in the tax charge for the expected repatriation of a portion of 2012 earnings. The expected repatriation of a portion of 2012 earnings increases the 2012 estimated annual effective tax rate by 7%, which includes a 4% impact related to pretax charges for restructuring and other actions to be incurred by the international operations.
Second Quarter and First Six Months of 2011
In the second quarter of 2011, the corporation recognized tax expense of $41 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $129 million, or an effective tax rate of 31.6 %. The tax expense and related effective tax rate on continuing operations were impacted by recognizing various discrete tax items, none of which were material individually or in the aggregate.
In the first six months of 2011, the corporation recognized tax expense of $78 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $227 million, or an effective tax rate of 34.4 %. The tax expense and related effective tax rate on continuing operations were determined by applying a 34.7% estimated annual effective tax rate to pretax earnings and then recognizing various discrete tax items, none of which were material individually or in the aggregate. The expected repatriation of a portion of 2011 earnings increased the 2011 estimated annual effective tax rate by 2%.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
Each quarter, the corporation makes a determination of the tax liability needed for unrecognized tax benefits that should be recorded in the financial statements. For tax benefits to be recognized, a tax position must be more-likely-than-not to be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities. The amount recognized is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement.
22
The year-to-date net decrease in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits was $85 million, resulting in an ending balance of $377 million as of December 31, 2011. There was a decrease in the gross liability for uncertain tax positions of $92 million, of which $52 million relates to prior year decreases, $1 million relates to expiration of statutes of limitation, $1 million relates to audit settlements, and $38 million relates to favorable foreign currency exchange translation. The decrease in gross liability was partially offset by an increase in the gross liability for uncertain tax positions of $7 million related to 2012 increases.
At this time, the corporation estimates that it is reasonably possible that the liability for unrecognized tax benefits will decrease between $25 million to $50 million in the next twelve months from a variety of uncertain tax positions as a result of the completion of various worldwide tax audits currently in process and the expiration of statutes of limitations in several jurisdictions.
The corporations tax returns are routinely audited by federal, state, and foreign tax authorities and these audits are at various stages of completion at any given time. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) has completed examinations of the companys U.S. income tax returns through 2006. Fiscal years remaining open to examination in the Netherlands include 2003 and forward. Other foreign jurisdictions remain open to audits after 2000. With few exceptions, the company is no longer subject to state and local income tax examinations by tax authorities for years prior to 2005.
12. | Contingencies and Commitments |
Household & Body Care Middle Eastern Trademark Assignments In connection with the sale of the companys Household & Body Care division, the company has a contractual obligation to arrange for the transfer of certain trademark registrations in the Middle East from a third party licensee to the buyers of the Household & Body Care division. To date, the third party licensee has refused to cooperate with these transfers despite contractual commitments to do so, and the company is contemplating pursuing legal action in order to effectuate the transfer of these rights to the buyers. The company believes it is appropriately accrued for any potential obligations related to this dispute.
Aris This is a consolidation of cases filed by individual complainants with the Republic of the Philippines, Department of Labor and Employment and the National Labor Relations Commission (NLRC) from 1998 through July 1999. The complaint alleges unfair labor practices due to the termination of manufacturing operations in the Philippines by Aris Philippines, Inc. (Aris), a former subsidiary of the corporation. The complaint names the corporation as a party defendant. In 2006, the arbitrator ruled against the corporation and awarded the plaintiffs $80 million in damages and fees. This ruling was appealed by the corporation and subsequently set aside by the NLRC in December 2006. Both the complainants and the corporation have filed motions for reconsideration. The corporation continues to believe that the plaintiffs claims are without merit; however, it is reasonably possible that this case will be ruled against the corporation and have a material adverse impact on the corporations results of operations and cash flows.
Multi-Employer Pension Plans The corporation participates in various multi-employer pension plans that provide retirement benefits to certain employees covered by collective bargaining agreements (MEPP). Participating employers in a MEPP are jointly responsible for any plan underfunding. Factors that could impact funded status of a MEPP include investment performance, changes in the participant demographics, financial stability of contributing employers and changes in actuarial assumptions.
In addition to regular contributions, the corporation could be obligated to pay additional contributions (known as a complete or partial withdrawal liability) if a MEPP has unfunded vested benefits. These withdrawal liabilities, which would be triggered if the corporation ceases to make contributions to a MEPP with respect to one or more collective bargaining units, would equal the corporations proportionate share of the unfunded vested benefits based on the year in which the liability is triggered. The corporation believes that certain of the MEPPs in which it participates have unfunded vested benefits, and some are significantly underfunded. Withdrawal liability triggers could include the corporations decision to close a plant or the dissolution of a collective bargaining unit. Due to uncertainty regarding future withdrawal liability triggers, we are unable to determine the amount and timing of the corporations future withdrawal
23
liability, if any, or whether the corporations participation in these MEPPs could have any material adverse impact on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Disagreements over potential withdrawal liability may lead to legal disputes.
The corporations regularly scheduled contributions to MEPPs related to continuing operations totaled approximately $3 million in 2011 and $4 million in 2010. The corporations regularly scheduled contributions to MEPPs related to its sold North American fresh bakery operations totaled approximately $45 million in 2011 and $43 million in 2010. The corporation also recognized charges (credits) for partial withdrawal liabilities related to MEPPs, which are reported in discontinued operations, of approximately $3 million in the first six months of 2012, $(3) million in 2011 and $23 million in 2010. The $3 million credit in 2011 is an adjustment of an estimate made in 2010.
Hanesbrands Inc. In September 2006, the corporation spun-off its branded apparel business into an independent publicly-traded company named Hanesbrands Inc. (HBI). In connection with the HBI spin-off, the corporation and HBI entered into a tax sharing agreement that governs the allocation of tax assets and liabilities between the parties. As previously disclosed, HBI initiated binding arbitration claiming that it was owed $72 million from the corporation under the tax sharing agreement. In the first quarter of 2012, the tribunal ruled in favor of the corporation on all issues. In addition to prevailing in the arbitration issue, Sara Lee received $15 million from HBI for tax periods prior to the date of the spin-off. Sara Lee recognized the amount owed as income in the Selling, general and administrative expense line in the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Income for the first six months of 2012.
Nestec/Nespresso The corporation is involved in several legal proceedings relating to its manufacture and sale of LOR EspressO capsules. In June 2010, Nestec/Nespresso (Nestle) filed a suit against Sara Lee Coffee and Tea France alleging patent infringement related to Sara Lees sale and distribution of espresso capsules. On January 19, 2011, Nestle filed a similar suit against Sara Lee Coffee and Tea in the Netherlands after Sara Lee began selling espresso capsules in that country. On May 11, 2011, Sara Lee Coffee and Tea Belgium served a writ of summons on Nestle seeking a declaration of non-infringement in connection with Sara Lees sale and distribution of espresso capsules in Belgium. All of these proceedings relate to the alleged infringement of two European patents granted to Nestle with the exception of the Belgium matter, which also involves a third patent. In the lawsuit filed in France, Nestle claims that damages could be as high as 50 million. The corporation believes that the patents granted to Nestle are not being infringed and further believes the patents are invalid. We are vigorously contesting Nestles allegations.
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Introduction
The following is managements discussion and analysis of the results of operations for the second quarter and first six months of 2012 compared with the second quarter and first six months of 2011 and a discussion of the changes in financial condition and liquidity during the first six months of 2012. Below is an outline of the analyses included herein:
| Business Overview |
| Summary of Results |
| Consolidated Results Second Quarter and First Six Months of 2012 |
| Operating Results by Business Segment |
| Financial Condition |
| Liquidity |
| Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Estimates |
| Issued but not yet Effective Accounting Standards |
| Forward-Looking Information |
24
Business Overview
Our Business
Sara Lee is a global manufacturer and marketer of high-quality, brand name products for consumers throughout the world focused primarily in the meat, bakery, and beverage products categories. Our brands include Ball Park, Douwe Egberts, Hillshire Farm, Jimmy Dean, Senseo, Pickwick Teas and Sara Lee.
In North America, the company sells a variety of packaged meat products that include hot dogs, corn dogs, breakfast sausages, dinner sausages and deli meats as well as a variety of frozen bakery products and specialty items. These products are sold through the retail channel to supermarkets, warehouse clubs and national chains. The company also sells a variety of meat and bakery products to foodservice customers in North America. Internationally, the company sells coffee and tea products in Europe, Brazil, Australia and Asia through the retail and foodservice channels as well as a variety of bakery and other dessert products to retail customers in Australia and New Zealand.
Unless stated otherwise, any reference to income statement items in these financial statements refers to results from continuing operations. The results of the fresh bakery, refrigerated dough and foodservice beverage businesses in North America, and the international household and body care businesses and the European bakery businesses are being reported as discontinued operations. See Note 6 Discontinued Operations for additional information.
Summary of Results
The business highlights include the following:
| Reported operating income for the second quarter of 2012 was $101 million, a decrease of $74 million over the same period of the prior year due to an $88 million increase in charges for exit activities, business dispositions and other restructuring actions and $14 million of impairment charges recognized in the quarter. The negative impact of these charges was partially offset by cost savings initiatives and lower pension expense at the corporate level and a $17 million year-over-year increase in income related to the mark-to-market gains/losses associated with unrealized commodity derivatives. |
| Net sales for the second quarter of $2.1 billion were $123 million, or 6.3%, higher than the prior year as the favorable impact of pricing actions and a favorable sales mix shift were only partially offset by the negative impact of volume declines and the impact of changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Adjusted net sales rose $112 million, or 5.8%. |
| Diluted earnings per share from continuing operations for the second quarter declined from $0.14 in 2011 to $0.05 in 2012 as a result of the increase in restructuring and impairment charges as well as an increase in the effective tax rate from 31.6% in the prior year to 60.5% in the current year. |
| Total cash flow from operating activities declined from $233 million in the first six months of 2011 to $33 million for the first six months of 2012 due to the decrease in cash generated by discontinued operations as a result of business dispositions, an increase in cash contributions to pension plans and an increase in payments related to restructuring and spin-off related activities partially offset by a decline in the cash payments for income taxes and interest and improved working capital management and operating results, excluding significant items, for continuing operations. |
25
Challenges and Risks
As an international consumer products company, we face certain risks and challenges that impact our business and financial performance. The risks and challenges described below have impacted our performance and are likely to impact our future results as well.
The food businesses are highly competitive. In many product categories, we compete not only with widely advertised branded products, but also with private label products that are generally sold at lower prices. As a result, from time to time, we may need to reduce the prices for some of our products to respond to competitive pressures. In addition, the general economic weakness has negatively impacted our business and may also result in increased pressure to reduce the prices for some of our products, limit our ability to increase or maintain prices or lead to a continued shift toward private label products. Any reduction in prices or our inability to increase prices could negatively impact profit margins and the overall profitability of our reporting units, which could potentially trigger a goodwill impairment.
In January 2012, the Brazilian government revised the tax laws related to the export of green coffee which may negatively impact the International Beverage Brazil reporting units ability to achieve targeted profit levels. A decline in this reporting units profitability could trigger a goodwill impairment in the third quarter of 2012. There is approximately $40 million (73 million Brazilian real) of goodwill associated with this reporting unit.
Commodity prices directly impact our business because of their effect on the cost of raw materials used to make our products and the cost of inputs to manufacture, package and ship our products. In addition, under some of our contracts, the prices at which we sell our products are tied to increases and decreases in commodity costs. Many of the commodities we use, including coffee, wheat, beef, pork, corn, corn syrup, soybean and corn oils, butter, sugar and fuel, have experienced price volatility due to factors beyond our control. The companys objective is to offset commodity price increases with pricing actions and to offset any operating cost increases with continuous improvement savings. Commodity costs, excluding mark-to-market derivative gains/losses related to commodities, increased by approximately $323 million in the first six months, which is net of $37 million of currency mark-to-market gains related to coffee purchases recognized by the Coffee and Tea segment. The increase in commodity costs was offset by approximately $311 million of pricing actions.
The companys business results are also heavily influenced by changes in foreign currency exchange rates. For the most recently completed fiscal year, approximately 50% of net sales and operating segment income were generated outside of the U.S. As a result, changes in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the European euro, can have a significant impact on the reported results. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates increased net sales by $60 million and increased operating income by $10 million in the first six months of 2012.
The companys proposed spin-off of its Coffee and Tea business and resulting separation of Sara Lee into two independent, public companies is a complex transaction that impacts all aspects of our business. Although we believe the transaction will enhance long-term stockholder value, there are various financial and operational risks and uncertainties inherent in the spin-off that could have a negative impact on our financial results for at least the near term. These include the diversion of managements attention from operating and growing the business; potential disruption of operations due to restructuring and right sizing each company; the potential loss of, or inability to recruit, key personnel; and the potential inability to minimize stranded costs incurred in connection with the spin-off.
Non-GAAP Measures
Management measures and reports Sara Lees financial results in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). In this report, Sara Lee highlights certain items that have significantly impacted the corporations financial results and uses several non-GAAP financial measures to help investors understand the financial impact of these significant items. The non-GAAP financial measures used in this report are adjusted net sales, adjusted operating segment income, and adjusted operating income, which exclude from a financial measure computed in accordance with GAAP the impact of significant items, the impact of acquisitions and dispositions and changes in foreign currency
26
exchange rates. Management believes that these non-GAAP financial measures reflect an additional way of viewing aspects of Sara Lees business that, when viewed together with Sara Lees financial results computed in accordance with GAAP, provide a more complete understanding of factors and trends affecting Sara Lees historical financial performance and projected future operating results, greater transparency of underlying profit trends and greater comparability of results across periods. These non-GAAP financial measures are not intended to be a substitute for the comparable GAAP measures and should be read only in conjunction with our financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP.
In addition, investors frequently have requested information from management regarding significant items and the impact of the contingent sale proceeds. Management believes, based on feedback it has received during earnings calls and discussions with investors, that these non-GAAP measures enhance investors ability to assess Sara Lees historical and projected future financial performance. Management also uses certain of these non-GAAP financial measures, in conjunction with the GAAP financial measures, to understand, manage and evaluate our businesses, in planning for and forecasting financial results for future periods, and as one factor in determining achievement of incentive compensation. Two of the three performance measures under Sara Lees annual incentive plan are net sales and operating income, which are the reported amounts as adjusted for significant items and possibly other items. Operating income, as adjusted for significant items, also may be used as a component of Sara Lees long-term incentive plans. Many of the significant items will recur in future periods; however, the amount and frequency of each significant item varies from period to period. See Non-GAAP Measures Definitions for additional information regarding these financial measures.
Significant Items Affecting Comparability
The reported results for 2012 and 2011 reflect amounts recognized for actions associated with various restructuring actions and other significant amounts that impact comparability. More information on these costs can be found in Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Exit, Disposal and Other Restructuring Activities. See below for additional information regarding the nature of these items.
In preparation for the spin-off, Sara Lee has identified cost reduction opportunities of $180 million to $200 million, achievable over fiscal 2012 and 2013, which will result from the downsizing of corporate resources, the reduction in overhead within the North American meat businesses and the international coffee and tea businesses as well as the completion of Project Accelerate initiatives. Approximately $525 million to $550 million of net charges are expected to be incurred in 2012 related to the above cost savings initiatives, other spin-off related activities, as well as various other significant items. The net charge includes amounts related to both continuing and discontinued operations but excludes impairment charges and gains or losses on the sale of businesses. Of the total expected charge, approximately $234 million has been incurred in the first six months of 2012.
Exit Activities, Asset and Business Dispositions These costs are reported on a separate line of the Consolidated Statements of Income. Exit activities primarily relate to charges taken to recognize severance actions approved by the corporations management and the exit of leased facilities or other contractual arrangements. Asset and business disposition activities include costs associated with separating businesses targeted for sale, as well as gains and losses associated with the disposition of asset groups that do not qualify for discontinued operations reporting.
Other Significant Items The reported results are also impacted by other items that affect comparability. These items include, but are not limited to, impairment charges, debt extinguishment costs, and certain discrete tax matters, which include charges related to the tax on unremitted earnings, audit settlements/reserve adjustments, valuation allowance adjustments and various other tax matters.
27
Impact of Significant Items on Net Income and Diluted Earnings per Share Attributable to Sara Lee
Quarter ended December 31, 2011 | Quarter ended January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions, except per share data |
Pretax Impact |
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Sara Lee (2) |
Diluted EPS Impact (1) |
Pretax Impact |
Net Income(Loss) Attributable to Sara Lee (2) |
Diluted EPS Impact (1) |
||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring actions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance/retention charges |
$ | (7 | ) | $ | (5 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (39 | ) | $ | (29 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | ||||||
Lease & contractual obligation exit costs |
(81 | ) | (55 | ) | (0.09 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Consulting, advisory & other costs |
(37 | ) | (30 | ) | (0.05 | ) | (4 | ) | (3 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
(6 | ) | (3 | ) | (0.01 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total restructuring actions |
(131 | ) | (93 | ) | (0.16 | ) | (43 | ) | (32 | ) | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on HBI tax settlement |
| 5 | 0.01 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(14 | ) | (11 | ) | (0.02 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Litigation accrual |
(11 | ) | (7 | ) | (0.01 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Thailand flood loss |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Tax indemnification accrual adjustment |
| 2 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt extinguishment costs |
| | | (25 | ) | (16 | ) | (0.02 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Impact of significant items on income (loss) from continuing operations before significant tax matters |
(158 | ) | (105 | ) | (0.18 | ) | (68 | ) | (48 | ) | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||||||
Significant tax matters affecting comparability: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax on unremitted earnings |
| (21 | ) | (0.04 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Tax audit settlement/reserve adjustments |
| (1 | ) | | | 2 | | |||||||||||||||||
Tax valuation allowance adjustment |
| 2 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Impact of significant items on income (loss) from continuing operations |
(158 | ) | (125 | ) | (0.22 | ) | (68 | ) | (46 | ) | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance/ retention charges |
(16 | ) | (11 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (39 | ) | (28 | ) | (0.04 | ) | ||||||||||||
Consulting, advisory & other costs |
(7 | ) | (6 | ) | (0.01 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
| | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(14 | ) | (9 | ) | (0.02 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
540 | 371 | 0.62 | 886 | 490 | 0.77 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pension curtailment/withdrawal |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||
Tax basis difference adjustment |
| 71 | 0.12 | | 223 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax audit settlement/reserve adjustments |
| | | | 1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax valuation allowance adjustment |
| | | | (3 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Tax on unremitted earnings |
| 3 | 0.01 | | (1 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Significant items impacting discontinued operations: |
500 | 417 | 0.70 | 845 | 681 | 1.06 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Impact of significant items on net income attributable to Sara Lee |
$ | 342 | $ | 292 | $ | 0.49 | $ | 777 | $ | 635 | $ | 0.99 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Impact of significant items on income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
$ | (6 | ) | $ | | |||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(54 | ) | (4 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exit and business dispositions |
(84 | ) | (39 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(14 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Debt extinguishment costs |
| (25 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (158 | ) | $ | (68 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Notes:
(1) | EPS amounts are rounded to the nearest $0.01 and may not add to the total. |
(2) | Taxes computed at applicable statutory rates. |
28
Impact of Significant Items on Net Income and Diluted Earnings per Share Attributable to Sara Lee
Six Months ended December 31, 2011 | Six Months ended January 1, 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
In millions, except per share data |
Pretax Impact |
Net Income (Loss) Attributable to Sara Lee (2) |
Diluted EPS Impact (1) |
Pretax Impact |
Net Income(Loss) Attributable to Sara Lee (2) |
Diluted EPS Impact (1) |
||||||||||||||||||
Continuing operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring actions: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance/retention charges |
$ | (35 | ) | $ | (24 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | $ | (43 | ) | $ | (31 | ) | $ | (0.05 | ) | ||||||
Lease & contractual obligation exit costs |
(87 | ) | (59 | ) | (0.10 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Consulting, advisory & other costs |
(71 | ) | (57 | ) | (0.10 | ) | (6 | ) | (5 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
(12 | ) | (7 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (2 | ) | (1 | ) | | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total restructuring actions |
(205 | ) | (147 | ) | (0.25 | ) | (51 | ) | (37 | ) | (0.06 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on HBI tax settlement |
15 | 15 | 0.02 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(32 | ) | (22 | ) | (0.04 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Litigation accrual |
(11 | ) | (7 | ) | (0.01 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Thailand flood loss |
(2 | ) | (1 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Tax indemnification accrual adjustment |
3 | 4 | 0.01 | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Debt extinguishment costs |
| | | (55 | ) | (35 | ) | (0.05 | ) | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Impact of significant items on income (loss) from continuing operations before significant tax matters |
(232 | ) | (158 | ) | (0.27 | ) | (106 | ) | (72 | ) | (0.11 | ) | ||||||||||||
Significant tax matters affecting comparability: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax on unremitted earnings |
| (105 | ) | (0.18 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
Tax audit settlement/reserve adjustments |
| 69 | 0.12 | | 6 | 0.01 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax valuation allowance adjustment |
| (73 | ) | (0.12 | ) | | | | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Impact of significant items on income (loss) from continuing operations |
(232 | ) | (267 | ) | (0.45 | ) | (106 | ) | (66 | ) | (0.10 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Severance/ retention charges |
(17 | ) | (12 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (49 | ) | (35 | ) | (0.05 | ) | ||||||||||||
Consulting, advisory & other costs |
(14 | ) | (11 | ) | (0.02 | ) | (3 | ) | (2 | ) | | |||||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
| | | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | | ||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(385 | ) | (345 | ) | (0.58 | ) | | | | |||||||||||||||
Gain on sale of discontinued operations |
802 | 463 | 0.78 | 1,141 | 579 | 0.89 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pension curtailment/withdrawal |
(3 | ) | (2 | ) | | (1 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||
Tax basis difference adjustment |
| 189 | 0.32 | | 225 | 0.35 | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax audit settlement/reserve adjustments |
| | | | 1 | | ||||||||||||||||||
Tax valuation allowance adjustment |
| | | | (3 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||
Tax on unremitted earnings |
| (67 | ) | (0.11 | ) | | (6 | ) | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Significant items impacting discontinued operations: |
383 | 215 | 0.36 | 1,087 | 758 | 1.17 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Impact of significant items on net income attributable to Sara Lee |
$ | 151 | $ | (52 | ) | $ | (0.09 | ) | $ | 981 | $ | 692 | $ | 1.07 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Impact of significant items on income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales |
$ | (12 | ) | $ | (2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
(72 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exit and business dispositions |
(116 | ) | (43 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(32 | ) | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Debt extinguishment costs |
| (55 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | (232 | ) | $ | (106 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Notes:
(1) | EPS amounts are rounded to the nearest $0.01 and may not add to the total. |
(2) | Taxes computed at applicable statutory rates. |
29
Consolidated Results Second Quarter of 2012 Compared with Second Quarter of 2011
The following table summarizes net sales and operating income for the second quarter of 2012 and 2011 and certain items that affected the comparability of these amounts:
Quarter ended | ||||||||||||||||
Total Corporation Performance (In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 2,081 | $ | 1,958 | $ | 123 | 6.3 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Less: Increase / (decrease) in net sales from: |
||||||||||||||||
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
$ | | $ | 12 | $ | (12 | ) | |||||||||
Acquisitions/dispositions |
37 | 14 | 23 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted net sales |
$ | 2,044 | $ | 1,932 | $ | 112 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 101 | $ | 175 | $ | (74 | ) | (42.4 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Less: Increase / (decrease) in operating income from: |
||||||||||||||||
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
$ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
Restructuring actions |
(125 | ) | (43 | ) | (82 | ) | ||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
(6 | ) | | (6 | ) | |||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(14 | ) | | (14 | ) | |||||||||||
Litigation accrual |
(11 | ) | | (11 | ) | |||||||||||
Thailand flood loss |
(2 | ) | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
Acquisitions/dispositions |
3 | 2 | 1 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 256 | $ | 216 | $ | 40 | 18.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
Net sales increased by $123 million or 6.3%. The weakening of foreign currencies, particularly the Brazilian real decreased reported net sales by $12 million, or 0.6%. Acquisitions net of dispositions increased net sales by $23 million. As a result, adjusted net sales increased by $112 million or 5.8% due to the impact of pricing actions and a favorable shift in sales mix partially offset by the negative impact of a 4.9% decline in unit volumes.
The following table summarizes the components of the percentage change in net sales as compared to the prior year:
Second Quarter 2012
Net Sales Changes |
Unit Volumes |
+ | Mix | + | Price | + | Other | + | Acquisitions/ (Divestitures) |
+ | Foreign Exchange |
= | Net Sales Change |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Continuing Business |
(4.9 | )% | 2.9 | % | 7.7 | % | 0.1 | % | 1.1 | % | (0.6 | )% | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
Operating income decreased by $74 million, or 42.4%. The year-over-year net impact of the changes in foreign currency exchange rates, restructuring charges, and the other factors identified in the preceding table decreased operating income by $114 million. Adjusted operating income increased $40 million, or 18.4%, due in part to the favorable impact of a $17 million increase in unrealized commodity mark-to-market derivative income versus the prior year and a reduction in general corporate expenses excluding the significant items noted above. General corporate expenses, as reported, increased $118 million due to a $110 million increase in restructuring and spin-off related charges, a $14 million impairment charge and $13 million of litigation and flood loss charges. The remaining decrease in general corporate expenses of $20 million was due to headcount reductions and other cost savings initiatives and lower benefit plan costs. The individual components that impacted operating income are discussed in more detail below.
30
Gross Margin
Gross margin dollars in the second quarter of 2012 increased $19 million over the prior year due to an improved sales mix, a year-over-year increase in mark-to-market gain related to unrealized commodity derivatives and savings from continuous improvement programs. These improvements were partially offset by lower unit volumes. The gross margin percent decreased from 34.6% in the second quarter of 2011 to 33.5% in the second quarter of 2012 primarily due to the impact of higher commodity costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Quarter ended | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
||||||||||||
SG&A expenses in the business segment results: |
||||||||||||||||
Media advertising and promotion |
$ | 93 | $ | 88 | $ | 5 | 6.6 | % | ||||||||
Other |
330 | 332 | (2 | ) | (0.6 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total business segments |
423 | 420 | 3 | 0.9 | ||||||||||||
General corporate expenses |
74 | 41 | 33 | 79.8 | ||||||||||||
Mark-to-market derivative (gains) / losses |
(3 | ) | (1 | ) | (2 | ) | NM | |||||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangibles |
3 | 3 | | (13.5 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total SG&A Expenses |
$ | 497 | $ | 463 | $ | 34 | 7.4 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased by $34 million, or 7.4%. Measured as a percent of sales, SG&A expenses increased from 23.7% in 2011 to 23.9% in 2012. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates decreased SG&A costs by $3 million, or 0.5%. The remaining increase in SG&A expenses is $37 million, or 7.9%. SG&A expenses in the business segments increased by $3 million, or 0.9%, due to a $5 million increase in MAP spending. General corporate expenses increased by $33 million due to an increase in charges related to restructuring actions and spin-off related costs partially offset by the favorable impact of headcount reductions and lower employee benefit costs. The year-over-year change in the mark-to-market gains/losses related to unrealized commodity derivatives decreased SG&A expenses by $2 million due to an improvement in derivative energy contracts.
Exit Activities and Other Significant Items
The reported results for the second quarter of 2012 and 2011 reflect amounts recognized for actions associated with the corporations ongoing business improvement and cost reduction program and other exit and disposal actions. The charges related to exit activities, asset and business dispositions were $84 million in the second quarter of 2012 versus $39 million in the second quarter of 2011. As discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements, Exit, Disposal and Other Restructuring Activities, the charges are associated with the renegotiation of global information technology contracts and spin-off related advisory fees.
Impairment Charges
Impairment charges of $14 million were recognized in the second quarter of 2012 related to the writedown of capitalized computer software that was determined to have no future use by the company.
Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense in the second quarter of 2012 was $18 million, which was $3 million lower than the second quarter of the prior year as a $1 million increase in interest expense was offset by a $4 million increase in interest income. The increase in net interest income was due to investment returns on the proceeds received from business dispositions.
31
Debt Extinguishment Costs
The corporation redeemed $456.7 million of aggregate principal outstanding of the 6 1/4 % Notes on October 8, 2010, which resulted in the recognition of a $25 million charge associated with the early extinguishment of this debt in the second quarter of 2011.
Income Tax Expense
Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides a detailed explanation of the determination of the interim tax provision. The following table sets out the tax expense and the effective tax rate for the corporation from continuing operations:
Second Quarter | ||||||||
(In millions) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Continuing operations |
||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 83 | $ | 129 | ||||
Income tax expense |
50 | 41 | ||||||
Effective tax rate |
60.5 | % | 31.6 | % |
In the second quarter of 2012, the corporation recognized tax expense of $50 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $83 million, or an effective tax rate of 60.5%. The tax expense and related effective tax rate on continuing operations were impacted by recognizing $20 million of discrete tax expense associated with deferred taxes on unremitted foreign earnings.
The corporations 2012 estimated annual effective rate increased from 34.7% in the second quarter of 2011 to 41.1% due primarily to an increase in the tax charge for the expected repatriation of a portion of 2012 earnings.
In the second quarter of 2011, the corporation recognized tax expense of $41 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $129 million, or an effective tax rate of 31.6 %. The tax expense and related effective tax rate on continuing operations was determined by applying a 34.7% estimated annual effective tax rate to pretax earnings and then recognizing various discrete tax items, none of which were material individually or in the aggregate.
Income from Continuing Operations and Diluted Earnings per Share (EPS)
Income from continuing operations in the second quarter of 2012 was $33 million as compared to $88 million in the prior year. The $55 million decline in earnings was due to the increase in restructuring charges and the increase in the effective income tax rate related to the tax on unremitted earnings.
Diluted EPS from continuing operations were $0.05 in the second quarter of 2012 as compared to $0.14 in the second quarter of 2011. Diluted EPS were favorably impacted by lower average shares outstanding during the second quarter of 2012, as the average shares outstanding declined from 642 million to 595 million. The lower average shares outstanding are due to significant share repurchases in the prior year.
Discontinued Operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations The discontinued operations reported income of $65 million in 2012 as compared to $255 million in 2011. The year-over-year decline in results was due to a $155 million decline in results for the North American Fresh bakery operations as a result of the year-over-year change in the tax benefit related to tax basis differences. With the exception of the foodservice beverage business in North America, the second quarter results for 2012 represent less than a full three months of results due to the timing of the dispositions of these businesses.
32
Gain on sale of discontinued operations In the second quarter of 2012, the corporation completed the disposition of its North American fresh bakery and foodservice beverage businesses as well as its non-European insecticides businesses, the Spanish bakery business and a portion of the shoe care business and recognized a total pretax gain of $540 million and an after tax gain of $371 million. In the second quarter of 2011, the corporation recognized a pretax gain of $886 million and an after tax gain of $490 million, which primarily related to the disposition of its global body care and European detergents business. Further details regarding these transactions are included in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Discontinued Operations.
Net Income and Diluted Earnings per Share (EPS)
In the second quarter of 2012, the corporation reported net income of $469 million versus net income of $833 million in the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease in net income was due to the $55 million decrease in income related to continuing operations due to the restructuring charges and higher tax provision and a $309 million decrease in net income from discontinued operations. The decrease in net income from discontinued operations was due to the decline in results of operations and the gain on dispositions noted previously. The net income attributable to Sara Lee was $468 million in the second quarter of 2012 compared to income of $831 million in the second quarter of 2011.
Diluted EPS decreased from $1.30 per share in the second quarter of 2011 to $0.79 per share in the second quarter of 2012. Diluted EPS were impacted by lower average shares outstanding during the second quarter of 2012, which resulted from the corporations share repurchases in 2011.
Consolidated Results First Six Months of 2012 Compared with First Six Months of 2011
The following table summarizes net sales and operating income for the first six months of 2012 and 2011 and certain items that affected the comparability of these amounts:
Six Months ended | ||||||||||||||||
Total Corporation Performance (In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 4,024 | $ | 3,685 | $ | 339 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Less: Increase / (decrease) in net sales from: |
||||||||||||||||
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
$ | | $ | (60 | ) | $ | 60 | |||||||||
Acquisitions/dispositions |
80 | 15 | 65 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted net sales |
$ | 3,944 | $ | 3,730 | $ | 214 | 5.8 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 212 | $ | 332 | $ | (120 | ) | (36.3 | )% | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Less: Increase / (decrease) in operating income from: |
||||||||||||||||
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
$ | | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 10 | |||||||||
Restructuring actions |
(193 | ) | (49 | ) | (144 | ) | ||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
(12 | ) | (2 | ) | (10 | ) | ||||||||||
Impairment charges |
(32 | ) | | (32 | ) | |||||||||||
Gain on HBI tax settlement |
15 | | 15 | |||||||||||||
Litigation accrual |
(11 | ) | | (11 | ) | |||||||||||
Thailand flood loss |
(2 | ) | | (2 | ) | |||||||||||
Tax indemnification accrual adjustment |
3 | | 3 | |||||||||||||
Acquisitions/dispositions |
6 | 2 | 4 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Adjusted operating income |
$ | 438 | $ | 391 | $ | 47 | 12.0 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Sales
Net sales increased by $339 million or 9.2%. The strengthening of foreign currencies, particularly the European euro and Australian dollar increased reported net sales by $60 million, or 1.7%. Acquisitions net of dispositions increased net sales by $65 million. As a result, adjusted net sales increased by $214 million or 5.8% due to the impact of pricing actions and a favorable shift in sales mix partially offset by the negative impact of a 4.9% decline in unit volumes.
33
The following table summarizes the components of the percentage change in net sales as compared to the prior year:
First Six Months 2012
Net Sales Changes |
Unit Volumes |
+ | Mix | + | Price | + | Other | + | Acquisitions/ (Divestitures) |
+ | Foreign Exchange |
= | Net Sales Change |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Continuing Business |
(4.9 | )% | 2.2 | % | 8.5 | % | 0.0 | % | 1.7 | % | 1.7 | % | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Income
Operating income decreased by $120 million, or 36.3%. The year-over-year net impact of the changes in foreign currency exchange rates, restructuring charges, and the other factors identified in the preceding table decreased operating income by $167 million. Adjusted operating income increased $47 million or 12.0% due in part to the increase in adjusted operating segment income in the Coffee & Tea business segment and a reduction in general corporate expenses, excluding the significant items noted above, partially offset by the unfavorable impact of a $6 million decline in unrealized commodity mark-to-market derivative income versus the prior year. General corporate expenses, as reported, increased $151 million due to a $157 million increase in restructuring and spin-off related charges and a $32 million impairment charge partially offset by $5 million in net gains related to the HBI tax settlement, a tax indemnification accrual adjustment, a litigation accrual and flood losses. The remaining $33 million decrease in general corporate expenses was due to headcount reductions and other cost savings initiatives and lower benefit plan expenses. The individual components that impacted operating income are discussed in more detail below.
Gross Margin
Gross margin dollars in the first six months of 2012 increased $65 million over the prior year due to an improved sales mix and savings from continuous improvement programs which were only partially offset by the impact of lower unit volumes; higher commodity costs, excluding mark-to-market derivative gains/losses; and a year-over-year increase in mark-to-market losses related to unrealized commodity derivatives. The gross margin percent decreased from 33.9% in the first six months of 2011 to 32.6% in the first six months of 2012 primarily due to the impact of higher commodity costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Six Months ended | ||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
||||||||||||
SG&A expenses in the business segment results: |
||||||||||||||||
Media advertising and promotion |
$ | 183 | $ | 158 | $ | 25 | 15.8 | % | ||||||||
Other |
664 | 643 | 21 | 3.2 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total business segments |
847 | 801 | 46 | 5.7 | ||||||||||||
General corporate expenses |
100 | 68 | 32 | 46.8 | ||||||||||||
Mark-to-market derivative (gains) / losses |
(1 | ) | (3 | ) | 2 | 56.9 | ||||||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangibles |
6 | 6 | | (1.4 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total SG&A Expenses |
$ | 952 | $ | 872 | $ | 80 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Selling, general and administrative (SG&A) expenses increased by $80 million, or 9.1%. Measured as a percent of sales, SG&A expenses decreased from 23.7% in 2011 to 23.6% in 2012. Changes in foreign currency exchange rates increased SG&A costs by $16 million, or 1.9%. The remaining increase in SG&A expenses is $64 million, or 7.2%. SG&A expenses in the business segments increased by $46 million, or 5.7%, due to a $25 million increase in MAP spending. General corporate expenses increased $32 million versus the prior year as a result of an increase in charges related to restructuring actions and spin-off related costs partially offset by headcount reductions and lower employee benefit costs. The year-over-year change in the mark-to-market gains/losses related to unrealized commodity derivatives increased SG&A expenses by $2 million due to a decline in the gains associated with derivative energy contracts.
34
Exit Activities and Other Significant Items
The reported results for the first six months of 2012 and 2011 reflect amounts recognized for actions associated with the corporations ongoing business improvement and cost reduction program and other exit and disposal actions. The charges related to exit activities, asset and business dispositions were $116 million in the first six months of 2012 versus $43 million in the first six months of 2011. As discussed in Note 8 to the financial statements, Exit, Disposal and Other Restructuring Activities, the charges primarily relate to contract termination costs, spin-off related advisory fees and the planned termination of employees related to both European and North American operations as part of initiatives related to the spin-off and the elimination of stranded overhead.
Impairment Charges
Impairment charges of $32 million were recognized in the first six months of 2012 related to the writedown of capitalized computer software that was determined to have no future use by the company.
Net Interest Expense
Net interest expense in the first six months of 2012 was $39 million, which was $11 million lower than the first six months of the prior year due to a $3 million decrease in interest expense and a $8 million increase in interest income. The decline in net interest expense was due to the refinancing of approximately $800 million of debt at lower interest rates near the end of the first quarter of 2011. The increase in interest income was due to investment returns on the proceeds received from business dispositions.
Debt Extinguishment Costs
In 2011, the corporation redeemed its $1.1 billion 6 1/4 % Notes due September 15, 2011 and recognized a $55 million charge associated with the early extinguishment of this debt. See Note 7 Debt Issuances and Redemptions for additional information.
Income Tax Expense
Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements provides a detailed explanation of the determination of the interim tax provision. The following table sets out the tax expense and the effective tax rate for the corporation from continuing operations:
First Six Months | ||||||||
(In millions) |
2012 | 2011 | ||||||
Continuing operations |
||||||||
Income before income taxes |
$ | 173 | $ | 227 | ||||
Income tax expense |
174 | 78 | ||||||
Effective tax rate |
100.5 | % | 34.4 | % |
In the first six months of 2012, the corporation recognized tax expense of $174 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $173 million, or an effective tax rate of 100.5%. The tax expense and related effective tax rate on continuing operations were determined by applying a 41.1% estimated annual effective tax rate to pretax earnings and then recognizing $103 million of discrete tax items. The discrete tax items relate to the following:
| $73 million of tax expense to establish a valuation allowance on net operating losses in France. |
| $79 million of tax expense to establish a deferred tax liability related to earnings that are no longer permanently reinvested in Spain offset by a tax benefit of $69 million primarily related to a decrease in the amount of unrecognized tax positions in Spain. |
| $20 million of tax expense associated with deferred taxes on unremitted foreign earnings. |
35
The corporations 2012 estimated annual effective rate increased from 34.7% in the first six months of 2011 to 41.1% due primarily to an increase in the tax charge for the expected repatriation of a portion of 2012 earnings. The expected repatriation of a portion of 2012 earnings increases the 2012 estimated annual effective tax rate by 7%, which includes a 4% impact related to pretax charges for restructuring and other actions to be incurred by the international operations.
In the first six months of 2011, the corporation recognized tax expense of $78 million on pretax income from continuing operations of $227 million, or an effective tax rate of 34.4%. The tax expense and related effective tax rate on continuing operations was determined by applying a 34.7% estimated annual effective tax rate to pretax earnings and then recognizing various discrete tax items, none of which were material individually or in the aggregate. The expected repatriation of a portion of 2011 earnings increased the 2011 estimated annual effective tax rate by 2%.
Income from Continuing Operations and Diluted Earnings per Share (EPS)
The company reported a loss from continuing operations in the first six months of 2012 of $1 million as compared to income of $149 million in the prior year. The $150 million decline in earnings was due in large part to a $96 million increase in income tax expenses related to the tax items previously discussed and an increase in restructuring and impairment charges.
Diluted EPS from continuing operations was nil in the first six months of 2012 as compared to $0.23 in the first six months of 2011. Diluted EPS were impacted by lower average shares outstanding during the first six months of 2012, as the average shares outstanding declined from 649 million to 592 million. The lower average shares outstanding are due to the share repurchases in the prior year.
Discontinued Operations
Income (loss) from discontinued operations The discontinued operations reported an after tax loss of $208 million in 2012 as compared to income of $299 million in 2011. The loss in 2012 was the result of a $345 million after tax impairment charge primarily related to the European bakery businesses. The year-over-year decline in results was due to the impairment charge noted above as well as an $83 million decline in results for the North American fresh bakery operations due primarily to the year-over-year change in the tax benefit related to tax basis differences.
The results of discontinued operations reported in the first six months of 2012 and 2011 represent a full six months of results for the foodservice beverage businesses in North America. The results for the remaining businesses in discontinued operations include less than a full six months due to the timing of the dispositions of these businesses.
Gain on sale of discontinued operations In the first six months of 2012, the corporation completed the disposition of its fresh bakery, foodservice beverage and refrigerated dough businesses in North America as well as its European Spanish bakery business, its non-European insecticides businesses and a portion of the shoe care business and recognized a total pretax gain of $802 million ($463 million after tax). The tax provision on the refrigerated dough disposition was negatively impacted by a book/tax basis difference related to $254 million of goodwill that is not deductible. In the first six months of 2011, the corporation completed the disposition of its global body care and European detergents and air care businesses and recognized a pretax gain on the disposition of $1.141 billion ($579 million after tax). Further details regarding these transactions are included in Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Discontinued Operations.
Net Income and Diluted Earnings per Share (EPS)
In the first six months of 2012, the corporation reported net income of $254 million versus $1.027 billion in the comparable period of the prior year. The decrease in net income was due to the $150 million decrease in income related to continuing operations due in large part to the higher tax provision and a $623 million decrease in net income from discontinued operations. The decrease in net income from discontinued operations was due to a $507 million decline in income from discontinued operations as well as a $116 million decline in the gain on the disposition of businesses.
36
Diluted EPS decreased from $1.58 per share in the first six months of 2011 to $0.42 per share in the first six months of 2012 due to the factors previously noted. Diluted EPS were impacted by lower average shares outstanding during the first six months of 2012 due to share repurchases in 2011.
Operating Results by Business Segment
Net sales and income before income taxes by business segment for 2012 and 2011 are as follows:
Net Sales | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||
North American Retail |
$ | 741 | $ | 741 | $ | 1,425 | $ | 1,436 | ||||||||
N.A. Foodservice and Specialty Meats |
314 | 290 | 621 | 564 | ||||||||||||
Coffee & Tea |
998 | 899 | 1,920 | 1,627 | ||||||||||||
Australian Bakery |
35 | 35 | 73 | 71 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total business segments |
2,088 | 1,965 | 4,039 | 3,698 | ||||||||||||
Intersegment sales |
(7 | ) | (7 | ) | (15 | ) | (13 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total net |
$ | 2,081 | $ | 1,958 | $ | 4,024 | $ | 3,685 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes | ||||||||||||||||
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
||||||||||||
North American Retail |
$ | 81 | $ | 84 | $ | 123 | $ | 144 | ||||||||
N. A. Foodservice and Specialty Meats |
33 | 38 | 60 | 61 | ||||||||||||
Coffee & Tea |
140 | 109 | 254 | 199 | ||||||||||||
Australian Bakery |
3 | (1 | ) | 5 | 1 | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating segment income |
257 | 230 | 442 | 405 | ||||||||||||
General corporate expense |
(168 | ) | (50 | ) | (228 | ) | (77 | ) | ||||||||
Mark-to-market derivative gains/(losses) |
15 | (2 | ) | 4 | 10 | |||||||||||
Amortization of intangibles |
(3 | ) | (3 | ) | (6 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating income |
101 | 175 | 212 | 332 | ||||||||||||
Net interest expense |
(18 | ) | (21 | ) | (39 | ) | (50 | ) | ||||||||
Debt extinguishment costs |
| (25 | ) | | (55 | ) | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
$ | 83 | $ | 129 | $ | 173 | $ | 227 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables illustrate the components of the change in net sales versus the prior year for each business segment and the total corporation:
Second Quarter 2012
Net Sales Changes |
Unit Volumes |
+ | Mix | + | Price | + | Other | + | Acquisitions/ (Divestitures) |
+ | Foreign Exchange |
= | Net Sales Change |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North American Retail |
(4.9 | )% | 1.5 | % | 4.4 | % | (1.1 | )% | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | (0.1 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North American Foodservice & Specialty Meats |
(0.4 | ) | 0.1 | 3.5 | 0.4 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 8.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coffee & Tea |
(6.5 | ) | 5.1 | 11.8 | 1.2 | 0.9 | (1.5 | ) | 11.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Australian Bakery |
(5.0 | ) | (0.4 | ) | 5.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 1.5 | 1.7 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Continuing Business |
(4.9 | )% | 2.9 | % | 7.7 | % | 0.1 | % | 1.1 | % | (0.6 | )% | 6.3 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
First Six Months 2012
Net Sales Changes |
Unit Volumes |
+ | Mix | + | Price | + | Other | + | Acquisitions/ (Divestitures) |
+ | Foreign Exchange |
= | Net Sales Change |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North American Retail |
(6.0 | )% | 0.8 | % | 5.3 | % | (0.9 | )% | 0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | (0.8 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
North American Foodservice & Specialty Meats |
(1.4 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 4.4 | (0.1 | ) | 7.2 | 0.1 | 10.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Coffee & Tea |
(5.1 | ) | 4.5 | 12.7 | 0.8 | 1.4 | 3.7 | 18.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Australian Bakery |
(9.0 | ) | (1.2 | ) | 5.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 8.5 | 3.6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Continuing Business |
(4.9 | )% | 2.2 | % | 8.5 | % | 0.0 | % | 1.7 | % | 1.7 | % | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following tables summarize the net sales and operating segment income for each of the business segments for 2012 and 2011 and certain items that affected the comparability of these amounts:
North American Retail
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 741 | $ | 741 | $ | | (0.1 | )% | $ | 1,425 | $ | 1,436 | $ | (11 | ) | (0.8 | )% | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Adjusted Net Sales |
$ | 741 | $ | 741 | $ | | (0.1 | )% | $ | 1,425 | $ | 1,436 | $ | (11 | ) | (0.8 | )% | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating segment income |
$ | 81 | $ | 84 | $ | (3 | ) | (3.5 | )% | $ | 123 | $ | 144 | $ | (21 | ) | (14.8 | )% | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Less: Increase/(decrease) in operating segment income from |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring actions |
$ | (1 | ) | $ | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (9 | ) | $ | (1 | ) | $ | (8 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
(6 | ) | | (6 | ) | (12 | ) | | (12 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating segment income |
$ | 88 | $ | 84 | $ | 4 | 4.8 | % | $ | 144 | $ | 145 | $ | (1 | ) | (0.8 | )% | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross margin % |
28.4 | % | 31.0 | % | (2.6 | )% | 28.3 | % | 30.5 | % | (2.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
Net sales and adjusted net sales were virtually unchanged from the prior year as the negative impact of lower unit volumes was offset by pricing actions and a favorable shift in sales mix. Unit volumes declined 4.9% due to lower volumes for frozen bakery products, dry sausage, cocktail links, and deli meats which more than offset volume increases for breakfast sausages. Pricing actions, net of trade promotions, increased net sales by 4.4%.
Operating segment income decreased by $3 million, or 3.5%, while adjusted operating segment income increased by $4 million, or 4.8%. The increase in operating segment income was the result of lower SG&A costs, savings from continuous improvement programs and lower MAP spending which were only partially offset by the impact of lower unit volumes and higher commodity costs, net of pricing actions.
First Six Months
Net sales and adjusted net sales decreased by $11 million, or 0.8%, as a result of lower unit volumes, partially offset by pricing actions and a favorable shift in sales mix. Unit volumes declined 6.0% due to lower volumes for frozen bakery products, hot dogs, breakfast sandwiches, deli meats and smoked sausages which more than offset volume increases for breakfast sausages and corn dogs. Pricing actions, net of trade promotions, increased net sales by 5.3%.
Operating segment income decreased by $21 million, or 14.8%, while adjusted operating segment income decreased by $1 million, or 0.8%. The slight decrease in operating segment income was due to the impact of lower unit volumes and higher commodity costs, net of pricing actions, offset by savings from continuous improvement programs, lower SG&A costs and a favorable shift in sales mix.
38
North American Foodservice and Specialty Meats
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 314 | $ | 290 | $ | 24 | 8.3 | % | $ | 621 | $ | 564 | $ | 57 | 10.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Less: Increase / (decrease) in net sales from |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions/dispositions |
27 | 13 | 14 | 54 | 13 | 41 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net sales |
$ | 287 | $ | 277 | $ | 10 | 3.6 | % | $ | 567 | $ | 551 | $ | 16 | 2.8 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating segment income |
$ | 33 | $ | 38 | $ | (5 | ) | (13.6 | )% | $ | 60 | $ | 61 | $ | (1 | ) | (2.2 | )% | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Less: Increase/(decrease) in operating segment income from |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring actions |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | | $ | (1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Accelerated depreciation |
| | | | (2 | ) | 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions/dispositions |
3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating segment income |
$ | 30 | $ | 37 | $ | (7 | ) | (19.0 | )% | $ | 57 | $ | 62 | $ | (5 | ) | (8.5 | )% | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross margin % |
27.3 | % | 30.1 | % | (2.8 | )% | 27.0 | % | 28.4 | % | (1.4 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
Net sales increased by $24 million, or 8.3%, while adjusted net sales increased by 3.6%. The increase in adjusted net sales was due to price increases in response to an increase in commodity costs partially offset by the impact of unit volume declines and an unfavorable shift in sales mix. Pricing actions increased sales by 3.5%. Overall, net unit volumes declined 0.4% as lower bakery volumes due to demand softness caused by the continued weak economic conditions were only partially offset by higher volumes for meat products, especially smoked sausage, corn dogs, cooked breakfast sausage and ham.
Operating segment income decreased by $5 million, or 13.6%. Adjusted operating segment income decreased by $7 million, or 19.0%, as the unfavorable impact of higher commodity costs, net of pricing actions, higher MAP and other SG&A costs and an unfavorable shift in sales mix offset continuous improvement savings.
First Six Months
Net sales increased by $57 million, or 10.1%, while adjusted net sales increased $16 million, or 2.8%. The increase in adjusted net sales was due to the impact of price increases in response to an increase in commodity costs partially offset by unit volume declines and an unfavorable shift in sales mix. The pricing actions increased sales by 4.4%. Overall, net unit volumes declined 1.4% as lower bakery volumes due to demand softness caused by the continued weak economic conditions were only partially offset by higher volumes for meat products, especially smoked sausage, cooked breakfast sausage and corn dogs.
Operating segment income decreased by $1 million, or 2.2%. Adjusted operating segment income decreased by $5 million, or 8.5%, as the unfavorable impact of higher commodity costs, net of pricing actions, lower unit volumes and higher MAP spending were only partially offset by continuous improvement savings.
39
Coffee & Tea
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 998 | $ | 899 | $ | 99 | 11.0 | % | $ | 1,920 | $ | 1,627 | $ | 293 | 18.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Less: Increase / (decrease) in net sales from |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
$ | | $ | 12 | $ | (12 | ) | $ | | $ | (54 | ) | $ | 54 | ||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions/Dispositions |
10 | 1 | 9 | 26 | 2 | 24 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net sales |
$ | 988 | $ | 886 | $ | 102 | 11.6 | % | $ | 1,894 | $ | 1,679 | $ | 215 | 12.9 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating segment income |
$ | 140 | $ | 109 | $ | 31 | 28.7 | % | $ | 254 | $ | 199 | $ | 55 | 27.7 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Less: Increase/(decrease) in operating segment income from |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
$ | | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 1 | $ | | $ | (10 | ) | $ | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||
Restructuring actions |
(4 | ) | (33 | ) | 29 | (13 | ) | (35 | ) | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Acquisitions/dispositions |
| 1 | (1 | ) | 2 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating segment income |
$ | 144 | $ | 142 | $ | 2 | 1.8 | % | $ | 265 | $ | 243 | $ | 22 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross margin % |
38.0 | % | 39.5 | % | (1.5 | )% | 37.4 | % | 38.3 | % | (0.9 | )% | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
Net sales increased by $99 million, or 11.0%. The impact of foreign currency changes, particularly in the Brazilian real, decreased reported net sales by $12 million, while acquisitions net of dispositions increased net sales by $9 million. Adjusted net sales increased by $102 million, or 11.6%. The increase was due to pricing actions and a favorable shift in sales mix partially offset by lower unit volumes. Pricing actions increased net sales by 11.8%. Unit volumes decreased 6.5% due to volume declines in the retail channel and foodservice channels. Retail volumes in Europe declined due to lower volumes for traditional roast and ground, due in part to the withdrawal from private label business in France and the weak economic conditions throughout Europe, partially offset by increases in single serve coffee volumes. Instant coffee volumes declined due to the flooding in Thailand while unit volumes in Brazil were virtually flat. Foodservice channel volumes declined due to lower unit volumes in Europe despite increases in coffee concentrate volumes.
Operating segment income increased by $31 million, or 28.7%. Adjusted operating segment income increased by $2 million, or 1.8%, due to the impact of a favorable shift in sales mix and pricing actions partially offset by higher commodity costs (net of foreign currency raw material hedging losses of $1 million), lower unit volumes and higher MAP spending.
First Six Months
Net sales increased by $293 million, or 18.0%. The impact of foreign currency changes, particularly in the European euro and Australian dollar, increased reported net sales by $54 million, while acquisitions net of dispositions increased net sales by $24 million. Adjusted net sales increased by $215 million, or 12.9%. The increase was due to pricing actions, a favorable shift in sales mix, and higher green coffee export sales partially offset by lower unit volumes. Pricing actions increased net sales by 12.7%. Unit volumes decreased 5.1% due to volume declines in the retail and foodservice channels. Retail volumes in Europe declined due to lower volumes for traditional roast and ground, due in part to the withdrawal from private label business in France and the weak economic conditions throughout Europe, partially offset by increases in single serve coffee volumes in Spain, France and Belgium. Instant coffee volumes declined due to the flooding in Thailand while unit volumes in Brazil were virtually flat. Unit volumes in the foodservice channel decreased slightly as higher unit volumes in Europe, driven by increases in coffee concentrates, were offset by lower export volumes.
40
Operating segment income increased by $55 million, or 27.7%. Adjusted operating segment income increased by $22 million, or 9.1% due to the impact of pricing actions and a favorable shift in sales mix partially offset by higher commodity costs (net of foreign currency raw material hedging gains of $37 million), lower unit volumes and higher MAP spending.
Australian Bakery
Quarter ended | Six Months ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
Change | Percent Change |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Sales |
$ | 35 | $ | 35 | $ | | 1.7 | % | $ | 73 | $ | 71 | $ | 2 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Less: Increase / (decrease) in net sales from |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | (6 | ) | $ | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted net sales |
$ | 35 | $ | 35 | $ | | 0.2 | % | $ | 73 | $ | 77 | $ | (4 | ) | (4.9 | )% | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Operating segment income (loss) |
$ | 3 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 4 | NM | % | $ | 5 | $ | 1 | $ | 4 | NM | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Less: Increase/(decrease) in operating segment income (loss) from |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Changes in foreign currency exchange rates |
$ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Adjusted operating segment income |
$ | 3 | $ | (1 | ) | $ | 4 | NM | % | $ | 5 | $ | 1 | $ | 4 | NM | % | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Gross margin % |
25.6 | % | 22.7 | % | 2.9 | % | 27.5 | % | 25.9 | % | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter
Net sales increased by less than $1 million, or 1.7%. The impact of foreign currency changes, particularly in the Australian dollar, increased reported net sales by less than $1 million. Adjusted net sales were virtually unchanged from the prior year as lower unit volumes were offset by the positive impact of price increases, which increased net sales by 5.3%. Net unit volumes decreased 5.0%.
Operating segment income and adjusted operating segment income increased by $4 million. The net impact of the change in foreign currency exchange rates was less than $1 million. The increase in adjusted operating segment income was due to pricing actions partially offset by the negative impact of lower unit volumes and higher commodity costs.
First Six Months
Net sales increased by $2 million, or 3.6%. The impact of foreign currency changes, particularly in the Australian dollar, increased reported net sales by $6 million. Adjusted net sales decreased $4 million, or 4.9% as lower unit volumes offset the positive impact of price increases, which increased net sales by 5.0%. Net unit volumes decreased 9.0%.
Operating segment income and adjusted operating segment income increased by $4 million. The net change in foreign currency exchange rates increased operating segment income by less than $1 million. Adjusted operating segment income increased as a result of pricing actions which offset the negative impact of lower unit volumes and higher commodity costs.
41
Financial Condition
The Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows include amounts related to discontinued operations. The discontinued operations had a significant impact on the cash flows from operating activities for the first six months of 2012 and 2011. See Note 6 Discontinued Operations for additional information regarding cash flows related to discontinued operations.
Cash from (used in) Operating Activities
The cash from operating activities generated by continuing and discontinued operations in the first six months of 2012 and 2011 is summarized in the following table.
Six Months ended | ||||||||
(In millions) |
Dec. 31, 2011 |
Jan. 1, 2011 |
||||||
Cash from Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Continuing Operations |
$ | 79 | $ | 34 | ||||
Discontinued Operations |
(46 | ) | 199 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total |
$ | 33 | $ | 233 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The cash from operating activities declined $200 million versus the prior year due to the decline in cash generated by discontinued operations as a result of the impact of business dispositions as well as an increase in cash contributions to pension plans and an increase in cash paid for restructuring and spin-off related activities. These declines in cash from operating activities were partially offset by a decrease in cash paid for income taxes and interest as well as the favorable impact of improved working capital management and operating results, excluding significant items, for continuing operations.
Cash from (used in) Investing Activities
The cash provided by investing activities was $1.3 billion in the first six months of 2012, as compared to $1.8 billion of cash provided by investing activities in 2011. The decrease in cash generated by investing activities was due to a $537 million decline in the amount of proceeds received from business dispositions. The cash received from derivative transactions declined from $36 million in 2011 to $25 million in 2012 due primarily to a decrease in cash received on the settlement of foreign exchange derivative contracts. Capital expenditures for the purchases of property, equipment, software and other intangibles decreased by $15 million in 2012 due in part to a reduction in expenditures related to the new Kansas City meat plant which was completed in 2011.
Cash from (used in) Financing Activities
Net cash used in financing activities declined by $581 million. The year-over-year change was due to a $645 million reduction in cash expended for share repurchases partially offset by a $170 million increase in repayments of debt and related derivatives, net of new borrowings. The company has indicated that it has no plans for any additional share repurchases after the amounts repurchased in 2011. In the first six months of 2012, the corporation had net repayments of short-term and long-term debt of $297 million, which included the payment of $156 million related to derivatives associated with this debt. The company had net repayments of $127 million during the first six months of the prior year due to the redemption of the companys 6 1/4% Notes, net of the issuance of $800 million of new debt. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, Debt Issuances and Redemptions, for further details regarding these refinancing actions. In 2012, there was $10 million of cash paid to acquire a noncontrolling interest portion of a business prior to the disposition of the entire business. The dividends paid in 2012 are $82 million lower than the prior year as the prior year amount includes one more dividend payment than the current year due to the timing of the payments. In addition, the current year dividend amount was impacted by the share repurchases made in 2011.
42
Liquidity
Notes Payable/Cash and Equivalents
The balance of notes payable at December 31, 2011 of $122 million was $116 million lower than the amount reported at July 2, 2011. The corporation had cash and cash equivalents on the balance sheet at December 31, 2011 of $2.751 billion, which was $685 million higher than the balance at July 2, 2011 as a result of the receipt of $1.5 billion of proceeds on business dispositions. A combination of new borrowings and cash were used to fund the repayment of approximately $440 million of debt and related derivatives, increased contributions to pension plans and the cost of restructuring and spin-off related activities. In addition, changes in foreign currency rates reduced cash by $243 million during the year.
Anticipated Business Dispositions/Use of Proceeds
In January 2011, the corporation announced that its board of directors has agreed in principle to divide the company into two separate, publicly traded companies which is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2012. Under the current plan, the international coffee and tea business will be spun-off, tax-free, into a new public company (spin-off). The other company will primarily consist of Sara Lees current North American retail, foodservice and specialty meats businesses. The separation plan is subject to final approval by the board of directors, other customary approvals and the receipt of an IRS tax ruling.
In conjunction with this planned separation, the board of directors intends to declare a $3.00 per share dividend on the corporations common stock. This special dividend is expected to be declared and paid in the fourth quarter of 2012.
Credit Facility and Credit Ratings
The corporation has a $1.2 billion revolving credit facility that is set to expire on the earlier of June 4, 2013 or the date on which the spin-off of the coffee and tea business is consummated. The credit facility has a facility fee of 0.175% and a participation fee of 1.075% of any outstanding letters of credit under the facility. A supplemental commitment fee of 0.05% becomes effective on each of June 30, September 30, and December 31 of 2012 if the facility is still in place on those dates. At December 31, 2011, the corporation did not have any borrowings outstanding under this facility, but it did have approximately $156 million of letters of credit outstanding under this credit facility. The facility does not mature or terminate upon a credit rating downgrade.
The corporations credit ratings by Standard & Poors, Moodys Investors Service and FitchRatings, as of December 31, 2011, were as follows:
Senior Unsecured Obligations |
Short-term Borrowings |
Outlook | ||||||||||
Standard & Poors |
BBB | A-2 | Stable | |||||||||
Moodys Investors Service |
Baa1 | P-2 | Negative | |||||||||
FitchRatings |
BBB | F-2 | Stable |
In January 2011, Moodys Investor Service placed the companys long-term rating under review for possible downgrade, likely limited to one notch. It also affirmed the companys P-2 rating on short-term borrowings. In September 2011, FitchRatings placed the companys ratings on Rating Watch Evolving, which reflects that significant uncertainty exists as Sara Lee nears its targeted completion for the spin-off of the coffee and tea business. Rating Watch Evolving indicates that the ratings may be upgraded, downgraded or affirmed.
Changes in the corporations credit ratings result in changes in the corporations borrowing costs. The corporations current short-term credit rating allows it to participate in a commercial paper market that has a number of potential investors and a higher degree of liquidity. A downgrade of the corporations short-term credit rating would place the corporation in a commercial paper market that would contain significantly less market liquidity than it currently operates in with a rating of A-2, P-2 or F-2. This would reduce the amount of commercial paper the corporation could issue and raise its commercial paper
43
borrowing cost. To the extent that the corporations operating requirements were to exceed its ability to issue commercial paper following a downgrade of its short-term credit rating, the corporation has the ability to use available credit facilities to satisfy operating requirements, if necessary.
Debt
The corporations total long-term debt decreased $83 million in the first six months of 2012, from $2.408 billion at July 2, 2011, to $2.325 billion at December 31, 2011, primarily as a result of the repayment of debt and changes in foreign currency exchange rates. The corporations total long-term debt is due to be repaid as follows: $390 million in the remainder of 2012; $518 million in 2013; $20 million in 2014; $81 million in 2015; $404 million in 2016; $2 million in 2017 and $910 million thereafter. These maturing debt obligations are expected to be satisfied with a combination of new long-term debt issuances, short-term borrowings, cash on hand, and operating cash flows.
From time to time, the corporation opportunistically may repurchase or retire its outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, the corporations liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved could be material.
Including the impact of swaps that are effective hedges and convert the economic characteristics of the debt, the corporations long-term debt and notes payable consist of 88.1% fixed-rate debt as of December 31, 2011, as compared with 68.3% as of July 2, 2011. The corporation monitors the interest rate environments in the geographic regions in which it operates and modifies the components of its debt portfolio as necessary to manage interest rate and foreign currency risks.
Covenants
The corporations debt agreements and credit facility contain customary representations, warranties and events of default, as well as, affirmative, negative and financial covenants with which the corporation is in compliance. One financial covenant includes a requirement to maintain an interest coverage ratio of not less than 2.0 to 1.0. The interest coverage ratio is based on the ratio of EBIT to consolidated net interest expense with consolidated EBIT equal to net income attributable to Sara Lee plus interest expense, income tax expense, and extraordinary or non-recurring non-cash charges and gains. For the 12 months ended December 31, 2011 the corporations interest coverage ratio was 7.7 to 1.0.
Leases
The corporation has numerous operating leases for manufacturing facilities, warehouses, office space, vehicles, machinery and equipment. Operating lease obligations for continuing operations are scheduled to be paid as follows: $25 million in the remainder of 2012; $41 million in 2013; $31 million in 2014; $25 million in 2015; $20 million in 2016; $14 million in 2017 and $54 million, thereafter. The corporation is contingently liable for certain long-term leases on property operated by others. These leased properties relate to certain businesses that have been sold. The corporation continues to be liable for the remaining terms of the leases on these properties in the event that the owners of the businesses are unable to satisfy the lease liability. The minimum annual rentals under these leases are as follows: $7 million in the remainder of 2012; $11 million in 2013; $10 million in 2014; $8 million in 2015; $2 million in 2016; nil in 2017 and $27 million, thereafter.
44
The corporation has various funding obligations and certain contingent guaranty obligations that are outlined below.
Pension Plans
The funded status of the corporations defined benefit pension plans is defined as the amount by which the projected benefit obligation exceeds the plan assets. For continuing operations, the U.S. plans were underfunded by $121 million and the international plans were overfunded by $159 million as of the end of 2011. Further information on the corporations pension plans is contained in Note 10 to these Consolidated Financial Statements. The corporation anticipates recognizing income of approximately $14 million in continuing operations in 2012 for its defined benefit pension plans.
The corporation contributed $121 million in the first six months of 2012 to these defined benefit pension plans, which includes a 60 million contribution to the companys Dutch pension plan related to an agreement with the unions to restructure this plan. The corporation anticipates that approximately $220 million of cash contributions will be made for the entire fiscal year, of which approximately $214 million relates to its international plans. The exact amount of cash contributions made to pension plans in any year is dependent upon a number of factors including minimum funding requirements in the jurisdictions in which the company operates and arrangements made with the trustees of certain foreign plans. As a result, actual funding in 2012 may be materially different from the current estimate. The Significant Accounting Policies section and Note 16 - Defined Benefit Pension Plans to the Consolidated Financial Statements, that are included in the corporations 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, provide a more complete description of the measurement date, assumptions, funded status, expected benefit payments and funding policies related to these defined benefit plans.
The corporation participates in various multi-employer pension plans that provide retirement benefits to certain employees covered by collective bargaining agreements (MEPP). Participating employers in a MEPP are jointly responsible for any plan underfunding. Factors that could impact funded status of a MEPP include investment performance, changes in the participant demographics, financial stability of contributing employers and changes in actuarial assumptions.
In addition to regular contributions, the corporation could be obligated to pay additional contributions (known as a complete or partial withdrawal liability) if a MEPP has unfunded vested benefits. These withdrawal liabilities, which would be triggered if the corporation ceases to make contributions to a MEPP with respect to one or more collective bargaining units, would equal the corporations proportionate share of the unfunded vested benefits based on the year in which the liability is triggered. The corporation believes that certain of the MEPPs in which it participates have unfunded vested benefits, and some are significantly underfunded. Withdrawal liability triggers could include the corporations decision to close a plant or the dissolution of a collective bargaining unit. Due to uncertainty regarding future withdrawal liability triggers, we are unable to determine the amount and timing of the corporations future withdrawal liability, if any, or whether the corporations participation in these MEPPs could have any material adverse impact on its financial condition, results of operations or liquidity. Disagreements over potential withdrawal liability may lead to legal disputes.
The corporations regularly scheduled contributions to MEPPs related to continuing operations totaled approximately $3 million in 2011 and $4 million in 2010. The corporations regularly scheduled contributions to MEPPs related to its sold North American fresh bakery operations totaled approximately $45 million in 2011 and $43 million in 2010. The corporation also recognized charges (credits) for partial withdrawal liabilities related to MEPPs, which are reported in discontinued operations, of approximately $3 million in the first six months of 2012, $(3) million in 2011 and $23 million in 2010. The $3 million credit in 2011 is an adjustment of an estimate made in 2010.
45
Repatriation of Foreign Earnings and Income Taxes
The corporation anticipates that it will continue to repatriate a portion of its foreign subsidiaries earnings. The tax expense associated with any return of foreign earnings will be recognized as such earnings are realized. However, the corporation pays the tax liability upon completing the repatriation action. The repatriation of foreign sourced earnings is not the only source of liquidity for the corporation. In addition to cash flow derived from operations, the corporation has access to the commercial paper market, a $1.2 billion revolving credit facility, and access to public and private debt markets as means to generate liquidity sufficient to meet its U.S. cash flow needs.
The corporation currently estimates that the continuing operations tax expense for the repatriation of a portion of 2012 and prior year foreign earnings to the U.S. will be approximately $53 million, with the majority of these taxes expected to be paid during 2012. In addition, the corporation has recognized $33 million of tax expense in the first six months of 2012 related to the repatriation of the gain on the sale of the insecticides business. It is anticipated that the majority of the cash taxes related to this repatriation action will be paid during 2012.
Restructuring Actions Liabilities
The corporation has recognized amounts for various restructuring charges. At December 31, 2011, the corporation had recognized cumulative liabilities of approximately $220 million that relate primarily to future severance and other lease and contractual payments. These amounts will be paid when the obligation becomes due, and the corporation expects a significant portion of these amounts will be paid over the next twelve months.
Guarantees
The corporation is a party to a variety of agreements under which it may be obligated to indemnify a third party with respect to certain matters. Typically, these obligations arise as a result of contracts entered into by the corporation, under which the corporation agrees to indemnify a third party against losses arising from a breach of representations and covenants related to such matters as title to assets sold, the collectability of receivables, specified environmental matters, lease obligations assumed and certain tax matters. In each of these circumstances, payment by the corporation is conditioned on the other party making a claim pursuant to the procedures specified in the contract. These procedures allow the corporation to challenge the other partys claims. In addition, the corporations obligations under these agreements may be limited in terms of time and/or amount, and in some cases the corporation may have recourse against third parties for certain payments made by the corporation. It is not possible to predict the maximum potential amount of future payments under certain of these agreements, due to the conditional nature of the corporations obligations and the unique facts and circumstances involved in each particular agreement. Historically, payments made by the corporation under these agreements have not had a material effect on the corporations business, financial condition or results of operations. The corporation believes that if it were to incur a loss in any of these matters, such loss would not have a material effect on the corporations business, financial condition or results of operations.
The material guarantees for which the maximum potential amount of future payments can be determined include the corporations contingent liability on leases on property operated by others which are described above, and the corporations guarantees of certain third-party debt. These debt guarantees require the corporation to make payments under specific debt arrangements in the event that the third parties default on their debt obligations. The maximum potential amount of future payments that the corporation could be required to make in the event that these third parties default on their debt obligations is approximately $13 million. At the present time, the corporation does not believe it is probable that any of these third parties will default on the amount subject to guarantee.
The Spanish tax authorities have challenged tax positions taken by the corporations Spanish subsidiaries and have required the corporation to provide bank guarantees as collateral for these matters. The corporation has obtained a bank guarantee of 64 million as security for the challenges related to 2003 to 2005. See Note 18 Income Taxes in the corporations 2011 Annual Report for more information.
46
Risk Management
The corporation maintains risk management control systems to monitor the foreign exchange, interest rate and commodity risks, and the corporations offsetting hedge positions. The corporation utilizes derivative instruments to create offsetting hedge positions and accounts for these instruments under either the hedge accounting model or the mark-to-market accounting model. The corporation utilizes the mark-to-market accounting model for certain of these derivative instruments and the change in fair value of derivatives that are accounted for under the mark-to-market accounting model are reported in earnings each period, which can lead to increased volatility in reported earnings.
As outlined in the corporations 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, the corporations control systems use analytical techniques including market value, sensitivity analysis and value at risk estimations. The value at risk estimations shown in the table below, which includes risks for the entire corporation, are intended to measure the maximum amount the corporation could lose from adverse market movements in interest rates and foreign exchange rates for a one-day period at a 95% confidence level.
(In millions) |
Amounts | Average | Time Interval |
Confidence Level |
||||||||||||
Value at Risk Amounts |
||||||||||||||||
First Six Months 2012 |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rates |
$ | 18 | $ | 24 | 1 day | 95 | % | |||||||||
Foreign exchange |
28 | 26 | 1 day | 95 | ||||||||||||
Year End 2011 |
||||||||||||||||
Interest rates |
$ | 21 | $ | 24 | 1 day | 95 | % | |||||||||
Foreign exchange |
15 | 18 | 1 day | 95 |
Interest rate value at risk decreased over 2011 due to a decrease in short term debt and rate volatilities. Increases in foreign exchange value at risk amounts in 2012 were primarily due to increases in the volatilities of both the euro and Brazilian real.
Sensitivity Analysis For commodity derivative instruments held, the corporation utilizes a sensitivity analysis technique to evaluate the effect that changes in the market value of commodities will have on the corporations commodity derivative instruments. This analysis includes the commodity derivative instruments and, thereby, does not consider the fair value change in the underlying exposure. At the end of the second quarter of 2012 and the end of 2011, the potential change in fair value of commodity derivative instruments, assuming a 10% change in the underlying commodity price, was $13 million and $22 million, respectively.
Non-GAAP Financial Measures Definitions
The following is an explanation of the non-GAAP financial measures presented in this report. Adjusted net sales excludes from net sales the impact of businesses acquired or divested after the start of the fiscal period and excludes the impact of an additional week in those fiscal years with 53 weeks versus 52 weeks. It also adjusts the previous years sales for the impact of any changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Adjusted operating segment income for a specified business segment or discontinued operation excludes from operating segment income the impact of significant items recognized by that portion of the business during the fiscal period and businesses acquired or divested after the start of the fiscal period. It also adjusts for the impact of an additional week in those fiscal years that include a 53rd week. It also adjusts the previous years operating segment income for the impact of any changes in foreign currency exchange rates. Adjusted operating income excludes from operating income the impact of significant items recognized during the fiscal period, contingent sale proceeds, if any, and businesses acquired or divested after the start of the fiscal period. It also adjusts for the impact of an additional week in those fiscal years that include a 53rd week. It also adjusts the previous years operating segment income for the impact of any changes in foreign currency exchange rates.
47
Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Estimates
The corporations significant accounting policies are discussed in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements that are incorporated in the 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K that is filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The accounting policies and estimates that can have a significant impact upon the operating results, financial position and footnote disclosures of the corporation are described in the Financial Review in the corporations 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Issued but not yet Effective Accounting Standards
A summary of new accounting pronouncements issued, but not yet effective, which are relevant to the operations of the corporation are summarized below.
Multiemployer Pension Plans (MEPPs) In September 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued an update which expands the disclosure requirements regarding MEPPs. The new disclosures will require more information about an employers financial obligation to a MEPP including, among other things: i) the amount of an employers contribution made to each significant plan or to all plans in the aggregate; ii) an indication if the employers contribution represents more than 5% of total MEPP contributions; iii) an estimate of the funded status of the MEPP; and iv) an indication if any MEPPs are subject to a funding improvement plan. The new disclosures will be required for the first time for the corporation at the end of 2012 but can be adopted early, if elected. This new standard will not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Goodwill Impairment Test In September 2011, the FASB amended its standards related to goodwill impairment testing with the objective being to simplify the annual goodwill impairment process by allowing entities to use qualitative factors first before performing the traditional two-step goodwill impairment test. The two-step impairment test is now only required if an entity determines through this qualitative analysis that it is more likely than not that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value. The new standard would be effective for the corporations goodwill impairment test in 2013 but we are permitted to adopt early. However, the corporation has not yet determined if this standard will be adopted early. Because the measurement of a potential impairment has not changed, the standard will not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Comprehensive Income The FASB amended the reporting standards for comprehensive income in June 2011 to eliminate the option to present the components of other comprehensive income as part of the statement of changes in stockholders equity. All non-owner changes in stockholders equity are required to be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. The amendments did not change the items that must be reported in other comprehensive income or when an item of other comprehensive income must be reclassified to net income. The amendment is retroactively effective for the corporation beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2013. This standard will not have an impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure In May 2011, the FASB issued an update amending the accounting standards for fair value measurement and disclosure, resulting in common principles and requirements under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (US GAAP) and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The amendments change the wording used to describe certain of the US GAAP requirements either to clarify the intent of existing requirements, to change measurement or expand disclosure principles or to conform to the wording used in IFRS. The amendments are to be applied prospectively and will be effective beginning in 2013 for the corporation. Early application is not permitted. We do not expect adoption of these amendments to have a significant impact on our consolidated results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
48
Forward-Looking Information
This document contains certain forward-looking statements, including the anticipated costs and benefits of restructuring, transformation and Project Accelerate actions, access to credit markets and the corporations credit ratings, the planned extinguishment of debt, the funding of pension plans, potential payments under guarantees and amounts due under future contractual obligations and commitments, projected capital expenditures, cash tax payments, pension settlement amounts and effective tax rates. In addition, from time to time, in oral statements and written reports, the corporation discusses its expectations regarding the corporations future performance by making forward-looking statements preceded by terms such as expects, projects, anticipates or believes. These forward-looking statements are based on currently available competitive, financial and economic data, as well as managements views and assumptions regarding future events. Such forward-looking statements are inherently uncertain, and investors must recognize that actual results may differ from those expressed or implied in the forward-looking statements. Consequently, the corporation wishes to caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements. Among the factors that could cause Sara Lees actual results to differ from such forward-looking statements are factors relating to:
| Sara Lees proposed spin-off plans and the special dividend announced on Jan. 28, 2011, such as (i) unanticipated developments that delay or negatively impact the proposed spin-off and capital plans; (ii) Sara Lees ability to obtain an IRS tax ruling and any other customary approvals; (iii) Sara Lees ability to generate the anticipated efficiencies and savings from the spin-off including a lower effective tax rate for the spin-off company; (iv) the impact of the spin-off on Sara Lees relationships with its employees, major customers and vendors and on Sara Lees credit ratings and cost of funds; (v) changes in market conditions; (vi) future opportunities that the Board may determine present greater potential value to shareholders than the spin-off and special dividend; (vii) disruption to Sara Lees business operations as a result of the spin-off; (viii) future operating or capital needs that require a more significant outlay of cash than currently anticipated; and (ix) the ability of the businesses to operate independently following the completion of the spin-off; |
| Sara Lees relationship with its customers, such as (i) a significant change in Sara Lees business with any of its major customers, such as Walmart, its largest customer; and (ii) credit and other business risks associated with customers operating in a highly competitive retail environment; |
| The consumer marketplace, such as (i) intense competition, including advertising, promotional and price competition; (ii) changes in consumer behavior due to economic conditions, such as a shift in consumer demand toward private label; (iii) fluctuations in raw material costs, Sara Lees ability to increase or maintain product prices in response to cost fluctuations and the impact on Sara Lees profitability; (iv) the impact of various food safety issues and regulations on sales and profitability of Sara Lee products; and (v) inherent risks in the marketplace associated with product innovations, including uncertainties about trade and consumer acceptance; |
| Sara Lees international operations, such as (i) impacts on reported earnings from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, particularly the euro; (ii) Sara Lees generation of a high percentage of its revenues from businesses outside the United States and costs to remit these foreign earnings into the U.S. to fund Sara Lees domestic operations, dividends, debt service and corporate costs; (iii) difficulties and costs associated with complying with U.S. laws and regulations, such as Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, applicable to global corporations, and different regulatory structures and unexpected changes in regulatory environments overseas; and (iv) Sara Lees ability to continue to source production and conduct operations in various countries due to changing business conditions, political environments, import quotas and the financial condition of suppliers; |
| Previous business decisions, such as (i) Sara Lees ability to generate margin improvement through cost reduction and efficiency initiatives; (ii) Sara Lees credit ratings, the impact of Sara Lees capital plans on such credit ratings and the impact these ratings and changes in these ratings may have on Sara Lees cost to borrow funds and access to capital/debt markets; (iii) the settlement of a number of ongoing reviews of Sara Lees income tax filing positions in various jurisdictions and inherent uncertainties related to the interpretation of tax regulations in the jurisdictions in which Sara Lee transacts business; and (iv) changes in the expense for and contingent liabilities relating to multi-employer pension plans in which Sara Lee participates. |
49
In addition, Sara Lees results may also be affected by general factors, such as economic conditions, political developments, interest and inflation rates, accounting standards, taxes and laws and regulations in markets where the corporation competes. Sara Lee undertakes no obligation to publicly update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
ITEM 4 CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The corporation maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports the corporation files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the corporations management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on managements interpretation of the definition of disclosure controls and procedures, in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e). In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, rather than absolute, assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost/benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Sara Lees Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, with assistance from other members of management, evaluated the effectiveness of Sara Lees disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the Evaluation Date) and, based upon such evaluation, have concluded that as of the Evaluation Date, the corporations disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the last fiscal quarter there have been no changes in the corporations internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the corporations internal control over financial reporting.
50
PART II
There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Part I, Item 1A of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 2, 2011.
ITEM 2(c) REPURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES BY THE ISSUER
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table outlines Sara Lees purchases of shares of its common stock during the second quarter of 2012.
Period |
(a) Total Number of Shares Purchased |
(b) Average Price Paid per Share |
(c) Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
(d) Maximum Number and Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1) |
||||||||||||||||
Oct. 2, 2011 to Nov. 5, 2011 |
| | | 13,459,121 | $ | 1.2 billion | ||||||||||||||
Nov. 6, 2011 to Dec. 3, 2011 |
| | | 13,459,121 | $ | 1.2 billion | ||||||||||||||
Dec. 4, 2011 to Dec. 31, 2011 |
| | | 13,459,121 | $ | 1.2 billion | ||||||||||||||
Total |
| | | 13,459,121 | $ | 1.2 billion |
(1) | Sara Lee has two continuing stock repurchase programs under which it may repurchase shares of common stock in either open market or private transactions. With respect to the first program, Sara Lee announced on August 4, 2005 that its Board of Directors had increased the number of shares authorized under this program by an additional 100 million shares. As of December 31, 2011, 13.5 million shares remain authorized for repurchase under this program. With respect to the second program, Sara Lee announced on September 25, 2009 that its Board of Directors had authorized a $1.0 billion share repurchase program and on February 16, 2010 its Board of Directors had increased this repurchase program by $2.0 billion shares (for a total authorization of $3.0 billion shares). As of December 31, 2011, $1.8 billion of shares have been repurchased under this program. There is no expiration date for either program. |
51
The Exhibits are numbered in accordance with Item 601 of Regulation S-K.
Exhibit Number |
Description | |
10.1 | Agreement dated August 30, 2011 between Sara Lee Corporation and Michiel Herkemij | |
10.2 | Fiscal Years 2012-2014 Program Frequently Asked Questions. | |
10.3 | Form of Fiscal Year 2012 Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Agreement | |
10.4 | Form of Fiscal Year 2012 Restricted Stock Unit Grant Notice and Agreement | |
10.5 | Form of Fiscal Year 2012 Stock Option Grant Notice and Agreement | |
10.6 | Fiscal Year 2012 Annual Incentive Plan Program Description | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101.1 | Sections of the Sara Lee Corporation Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the six months ended December 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) Consolidated Statements of Income; (iii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Common Stockholders Equity; (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements; and (vi) document and entity information. |
52
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SARA LEE CORPORATION | ||
(Registrant) | ||
By: | /s/ John P. Zyck | |
John P. Zyck | ||
Corporate Controller |
DATE: February 7, 2012
53
Exhibit 10.1
Board Agreement
The undersigned:
(1) | Sara Lee Corporation, a Maryland corporation, having its registered seat at 3500 Lacey Road, Downers Grove, Illinois, United States, represented by the chairman of the Executive Board of Sara Lee Corporation, Jan Bennink, hereinafter the Company; |
and
(2) | Mr M Herkemij, residing at [address on file with the Company] , hereinafter the Executive; |
Whereas:
| The Executive was elected an executive officer of Sara Lee Corporation, to serve as Executive Vice President of Sara Lee and as Chief Executive Officer of the International Beverage business segment of the Company with the intention to become the Chief Executive Officer of CoffeeCo after the Spin-Off has been executed, which terms are both defined hereafter; |
| Also against the background of the fact that, with effect from 1 January 2012, board agreements concluded between a Dutch listed company and a managing director can no longer be qualified as an employment agreement, the parties have expressed their wish and intention to enter into a management services agreement; |
| Taking into account the Executives other approved positions within the group, the Executive will be expected to devote his time and energy in full in a way commensurate with the best interests of the Company and its affiliated companies; |
| The parties wish to lay down the fee and other applicable conditions of engagement in this agreement; |
| Sara Lee Change in Control Plan shall mean: the terms of the Change in Control Plan contained in article 3 of the Sara Lee Corporation Corporate Officers Severance Plans, which apply generally to executive officers of Sara Lee, in the occurrence of a change in control as defined in that Change in Control Plan ; and |
| Spin-Off shall mean: the Companys plan, publicly announced on January 28, 2011, to split into two pure play companies by effecting the spin-off (the Spin-Off) of Sara Lees international coffee and tea business into a new, independent publicly traded company (such new company: CoffeeCo). |
DECLARE TO HAVE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. DATE OF COMMENCEMENT AND POSITION
1.1 | On 1 December 2011, the Executive enters into the Agreement with the Company as Chief Executive Officer of the International Beverage business segment |
1.2 | Upon the Spin-Off having been executed the competent authority within CoffeeCo will appoint the Executive as managing director under the articles of association (statutair bestuurder) and member of the Board of Management of CoffeeCo after having informed the General Meeting of Shareholders in accordance with article 2:162 of the Dutch Civil Code. |
1.3 | In connection with the duties of the Executive as member of the Board of Management under this agreement, the Executives principal place of work shall be the Netherlands, however the Executive shall be working at all necessary places, including other establishments of CoffeeCo or the Company, and accepts that the position entails considerable travelling. The Company will be entitled to change the principle place of work after consultation with the Executive. |
1.4 | The Executive is obliged to do or to refrain from doing all that an officer in similar positions should do or should refrain from doing and to observe the value the Company attaches to acting ethically. The Executive shall fully devote himself and his energy to promoting the interests of the Company, taking into account the Executives other approved positions within the group. |
1.5 | The Executive has the obligations which have been or will be imposed by law, by the Dutch corporate governance code, by the articles of incorporation of the Company and in any board regulations as such regulations shall apply from time to time. |
1.6 | As Chief Executive Officer, the Executive shall be responsible for all activities of CoffeeCo. He will hold the title of Chief Executive Officer International Beverage (IB). As soon as the Spin-Off has been executed, he will become CEO CoffeeCo. |
1.7 | The Executive will report to Jan Bennink, the executive chairman of the Company. |
1.8 | The Company agrees that, in connection with and effective upon completion of the Spin-Off, the Company will transfer and assign to CoffeeCo, and the Company will cause CoffeeCo to accept and assume, all of the terms of this Agreement (as per article 6:159 Dutch Civil Code). At and after the effective time of such transfer and assignment, CoffeeCo shall be solely responsible for compliance with all terms of this agreement that remain to be completed after the effective time of the Spin-Off and the Company shall have no further or continuing rights or obligations hereunder. Pursuant to the transfer and assignment of this Agreement it shall mutatis mutandis apply to CoffeeCo as the Company and the Executive. |
2. DURATION OF THE AGREEMENT, NOTICE OF TERMINATION AND TERMINATION FEE
2.1 | The Agreement is entered into for a definite period of four years as of 1 December 2011 (the Starting Date). Accordingly, this agreement will terminate by operation of law, without notice being required, on 30 November 2015 (the End Date), without prejudice to the right of the Company and the Executive to terminate the Agreement during this term. |
2.2 | The four year term shall be continued upon the listing of CoffeeCo and the start of the Executive as Chief Executive Officer of the CoffeeCo, which means that the Agreement will still terminate four years from the Starting Date. |
2.3 | Without prejudice to paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2, the Agreement may be terminated by either party during its term with due observance of a notice period of six months for the Company and a notice period of three months for the Executive. |
2
2.4 | No later than six months before the End Date, the Company and the Executive will inform the other party regarding the intention of continuation of the Agreement for a definite or an indefinite period after the End Date. |
2.5 | If after expiry of the period referred to in paragraphs 2.1 and 2.2, the Agreement is continued the Agreement may be terminated by either party by giving notice with due observance of a notice period of six months for the Company and a notice period of three months for the Executive. |
2.6 | If the Company gives notice of termination of the Agreement, other than due to an urgent cause, subject to the applicable notice period as referred to in paragraphs 2.3 and 2.5, a termination fee equal to an amount of twelve monthly instalments of the annual Base Fee as stipulated in paragraph 3.1 of this Agreement, will be made available to the Executive upon the effective date of termination. |
2.7 | In case of expiry of the period referred to in paragraph 2.1 and 2.2 a termination fee equal to an amount of eighteen monthly instalments of the annual Base Fee as defined in paragraph 3.1 of this Agreement will be made available to the Executive upon the effective date of termination. |
2.8 | The right to terminate this Agreement due to an urgent cause shall remain unaffected. In case of a termination for an urgent cause given by the Executive, no entitlement to a termination fee exists. The same applies in case of a termination by the Executive related to an urgent cause on the part of the Executive as well as in the event of an ordinary termination by the Executive. In case of termination of this Agreement by the Executive related to an urgent cause on the part of the Company, the Executive shall remain entitled to the termination fee as referred to in paragraph 2.6. |
2.9 | In the event of a Change in Control as defined in paragraph 2.10, the Executive has an extraordinary right to terminate this Agreement with due observance of the applicable notice period of three months and resign from his position as a managing director under the articles of association of the Company (statutair bestuurder) and as a member of the Board of Management of the Company as per the end of the notice period and from all further offices held in a company affiliated to the Company, provided it regards positions that are specifically, inextricably and expressly linked to his position as member of the Board of Management of the Company (so-called q.q.-positions). In case the Executive exercises this extraordinary right to terminate this Agreement, he is entitled to a termination fee according to paragraph 2.10. The extraordinary right to terminate this Agreement can only be exercised within six months after the Change in Control . The written notice of termination must clarify that the Agreement is terminated for the reason of Change in Control. Otherwise the Executive cannot refer to a change in control at a later point of time. |
2.10 | A Change in Control (Change in Control) takes place if the conditions are fulfilled as described in the Sara Lee Change in Control Plan. In this case, the Executive can invoke his extraordinary right under paragraph 2.9 when the Executives freedom to act in support of the business is unduly limited through interference by other company structures resulting in the Executive no longer being able to effectively act as managing director of the Company at the same level as before the Change in Control. Until the listing of CoffeeCo the Executive will be eligible for the benefits of the Sara Lee Change in Control Plan as set forth in the Corporate Officers Severance Plans. After the listing of CoffeeCo, CoffeeCo and the Executive will agree on participation by the Executive in a new change in control Plan, which will in general have the same conditions as the Sara Lee Change of Control Plan, however will be related to the size and activities of CoffeeCo at that time and also be in accordance with the Dutch Corporate Governance Code. |
3
2.11 | In case the Agreement ends as a result of a termination by the executive on the exclusive ground of Change in Control, the provisions as described in the Sara Lee Change in Control Plan apply, and after the Spin-Off and the subsequent listing of CoffeeCo, the provisions as described in the CoffeeCo Change in Control Plan apply. Any compensation resulting there from shall be made as a lump sum payment on the last day of the Agreement, unless it follows differently from the applicable Change in Control Plan. |
2.12 | Parties hereby establish that the Spin-Off or the subsequent listing of CoffeeCo does not qualify as a Change in Control under the Sara Lee Change in Control Plan. |
2.13 | The Executive is obliged to resign from all positions that are specifically, inextricably and expressly linked to his position as member of the Board of Management of CoffeeCo (so-called q.q.-positions) upon termination of this Agreement. |
2.14 | In case of non-occurrence of the listing of CoffeeCo by 31 December, 2012, both the Company and the Executive may terminate the Agreement, in which cases the Executive will receive a one-time payment equal to an amount of eighteen monthly instalments of the annual Base Fee, as stipulated in paragraph 3.1 of this Agreement, as well as (pro-rata) vesting of unvested grants, including the FY12-14 PSUs, as per paragraph 9.5. |
2.15 | Any termination fee received pursuant to this paragraph 2, which shall be made less any statutory withholdings, shall be received by the Executive in full and final settlement of all claims relating to the termination of the Agreement with the Company and will be set off against any compensation awarded by a court in relation to the termination of the Agreement, if any. If the severance payment has already been made at the time of such award, the Executive shall repay such amount exceeding the severance payment as unduly paid. |
3. COMPENSATION
3.1 | As of 1 December 2011, the Executives yearly basis board fee (Basis Fee) shall amount to 900,000.- gross per year, which shall be paid in twelve equal instalments at the end of each month, less any statutory withholdings. The next review of the Base Fee is scheduled for September 1, 2012. |
3.2 | The parties acknowledge and agree that the total remuneration pursuant to this Agreement is subject to the corporate governance rules and the remuneration policy, as applicable to the Company from time to time (such rules and policy: Governance). The Basis Fee as defined in paragraph 3.1 above as well as all other income components under the Agreement, will be determined on a yearly basis, taking into account the Agreement and in accordance with the Governance. The Company shall not unilaterally modify the Basis Fee to the prejudice of the Executive. |
4. HIRING PAYMENT
4.1 | The Company will provide the Executive with a one-off compensation equal to 1.1 million gross for the loss by the Executive of existing rights towards his predecessing employer relating to both short and long term incentives. The amount will be adjusted if (part of) the applicable incentives will be paid by the predecessing employer to the Executive after all. Such adjustment will be equal to the paid amounts. The payment of this amount will take place as follows: |
4
(i) | A gross amount of 600,000.- will be paid in cash within 30 days of the Starting Date. The Company will endeavour to pay this amount in the most tax efficient manner for the Executive, if at no further cost (other than for tax advice) or risk for the Company; |
(ii) | You will receive a phantom grant at the value of 500.000, to be issued to the Executive per 31 January 2012 as 100% Sara Lee company stock, to be converted in Coffeeco stock as per the Spin-Off date. |
4.2 | In case of voluntary termination of this Agreement by the Executive under paragraph 2.3 and in case of termination by the Company for cause on the part of the Executive (dringende reden) prior to the first anniversary of employment, the Executive will be immediately required to repay to the Company the net equivalent of the total sum of the gross amount mentioned under 4.1 1 or, if the Company cannot under applicable tax laws recoup the associated and remitted withholdings from the relevant tax authority provided the Executive has a legal possibility to successfully recoup, the gross amount mentioned under 4.1 |
5. PENSIONS
5.1 | The Executive will receive a monthly payment equivalent to the normal contribution that would have been made for him within the Dutch Pension Plan. This amount per signatory date equals EUR 14.667 per month. The Dutch Pension Plan consists of 2 pension schemes, which are operated by Stichting Pensioenfonds Sara Lee Nederland. |
5.2 | The Company will endeavour at the request of the Executive- to make the Executive participate in the pension scheme applicable within the Company in accordance with the conditions set forth in the applicable pension regulations, taking into account the amount mentioned under paragraph 5.1. |
6. TAX AND SOCIAL SECURITY
6.1 | The Executive and the Company wish to make use of the so-called 30%-ruling, as laid down in the relevant provisions of the 1964 Dutch Wage Tax Act and the 1965 Dutch Wage Tax Implementation Decree. The Company and Executive will therefore file an application for the 30%-ruling. Only if and when the facility is granted, the following is applicable: |
(a) | If and to the extent that the Executive is eligible for a tax-free reimbursement for extra-territorial expenses based on the relevant provisions of the 1965 Dutch Wage Tax Implementation Decree, it will be agreed that the remuneration for present board member activities agreed with the Executive will be reduced for civil law purposes in such a way that 100/70 of the thus agreed remuneration for present board member activities is equal to the originally agreed remuneration for present board member activities. |
(b) | If and to the extent that (a) is applied, the Executive shall receive from the Company reimbursement for extra-territorial expenses equal to 30/70 of the thus agreed remuneration for present board member activities. This allowance is tax-free, the 1964 Dutch Wage Tax Act allowing. |
5
(c) | The agreed remuneration for present board member activities as described in part (a) concerns all the actual to-be-paid or to-be-provided remuneration for present board member activities as described in the 1964 Dutch Wage Tax Act and the provisions based on it. |
7. VACATION
7.1 | The Executive will be entitled to vacation in accordance with legal and Company practice, which is currently 27 days per calendar year. For each vacation day that executive has duly administrated with the Company secretary he will receive continuous full payment of his Basis Fee as well as accrual of all further rights and payments under this Agreement. In case of termination of this Agreement the accrued, untaken holidays as per the termination date shall be paid out in accordance with the customary calculation method used by the Company, however with a maximum payment for 27 days. |
8. SHORT TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
8.1 | With effect from 1 December 2011 the Executive is eligible to participate in the short term incentive plan as established for the members of senior management of the Company for the year 2011, i.e. the Annual Incentive Plan (AIP): The AIP target for the financial year 2012 (FY 12) will be 100% of base salary (with maximum payout of 150%), based on actual IB performance (in accordance with the FY12 AIP plan). For FY12, the AIP will be weighted as follows: |
100% IB (40//40/20 Operating Income/ Net Sales/ Working Capital)
8.2 | For the purpose of FY12 AIP, the bonus will be pro-rated based on the time that the Executive works for the Company, which, based on his notice period with his previous employer, will be from 1 December 2011 through 30 June 2012. |
8.3 | With respect to any short-term incentive plans that will be applicable within CoffeeCo, the following applies: |
(a) | Within four weeks after the adoption of the annual accounts by the General Meeting of Shareholders, the Supervisory Board, with due observance of the following, will annually take a decision on the granting of short-term variable remuneration of the Executive; the short-term variable remuneration will be paid out to the Executive within two weeks after being granted by the Supervisory Board. |
(b) | The targets set annually by the Supervisory Board will each year, after they have been discussed with the Executive, be laid down in writing by the Company. |
(c) | The provisions in this paragraph concerning 2012 are based on the remuneration policy of the Company for 2012 as envisaged at the date of execution of this agreement. If the remuneration policy for 2012 deviates from the provisions of this paragraph, then the parts of the adopted remuneration scheme that most closely resemble the provisions laid down in this paragraph, will apply. In the years as of 2013, the remuneration as determined by the Supervisory Board within the remuneration policy as adopted by the General Meeting of Shareholders, will apply. |
6
(d) | In derogation of the above provision, the Supervisory Board reserves the right to determine the amount of the short-term variable remuneration at its own discretion in case of exceptional circumstances that would make payment in accordance with para 8.3 and 8.4 qualify as an unfair outcome, this discretionary right to be used in line with the rules of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code. |
(e) | The short-term variable remuneration is only granted if: |
| the Executive was not suspended or placed on leave of absence on full pay at the time of granting; or |
| the Agreement, before the moment of granting of the short-term variable remuneration, was not terminated for urgent cause or serious culpability of the Executive. |
8.4 | Without prejudice to the provisions of paragraph 8.3, the short-term variable remuneration will be calculated at a pro rata basis in the event of a departure during the calendar year or at retirement. |
9. LONG TERM INCENTIVE PLAN
9.1 | During the period until the End Date the Executive is entitled to an annual award for a long-term incentive (LTI) with a value of 1.5 million gross. The LTI will be linked to a three year period and therefore vest upon expiry of that three year period. The first three year period will be the period beginning per 1 January 2012 and ending 31 July 2014 (FY 12-14). For the FY12-14 period, the grant will be distributed as follows: |
| The grant will be made for 100% in so-called Performance Share Units (PSUs), with the equivalent value of the PSUs granted contingent on the stock price at close of business on the day of the grant. |
| The granting will take place in two instalments of partial grants, the first partial grant being made per 31 January 2012 and equivalent to: 1/3 of the entire LTI value, therefore consisting of 500,000 value of PSUs, the payout of which will be contingent on the Companys Operating Income for FY12. This grant will have a maximum payout of 150%. The remaining 2/3 of the grant (1,000,000) will be granted when CoffeeCo becomes a separate public company, and the payout will be based on Total Shareholder Return (TSR) against a peer group (still to be defined) for the period from grant date through June 2014. This grant is intended to have a maximum payout of 200% (to be formally approved by the Compensation & Benefits Committee once the performance peer group is finalized). |
| The FY12-14 grant will vest in full at end August 2014. |
9.2 | The next grant, with a value of 1,500,000, will be given per 1 August 2012 for the FY13-15 LTI period, which begins in July 2012. Further grants will be made each subsequent year per 1 August, also each time for subsequent three year granting and vesting periods. |
9.3 | The provisions in this paragraph concerning 2012 are based on the remuneration policy of the Company for 2012 as envisaged at the date of execution of this agreement. If the remuneration policy for 2012 deviates from the provisions of this paragraph, then the parts of the adopted remuneration scheme that most closely resemble the scheme laid down in this paragraph, will apply. In the years as of 2013, the remuneration as determined by the Supervisory Board within the remuneration policy as adopted by the General Meeting of Shareholders, will apply. |
7
9.4 | As part of the remuneration policy and subject to the approval by the General Meeting of Shareholders, a guideline for shareholding will apply for the members of the Management Board. This guideline recommends that the Executive in five years will build a shareholding in the company amounting to one time his annual base salary. The Executive declares himself prepared to cooperate with the compliance with this guideline. |
9.5 | In case this contract ends without urgent cause on the part of the Executive, he will be entitled to immediate vesting of the unvested PSUs on a pro rata basis (until 1st year after grant: 25%; between 1st and 2nd year after grant 50% between 2nd and 3rd year of the grant: 75%). |
EXPENSES
9.6 | Company Car: The executive is entitled to the use of a lease company car, which is in accordance with Company regulations, in terms of types and prices. Personal tax obligations will be the Executives own responsibility. The Company is currently working to provide this benefit as a cash payment (vs. providing the vehicle) and the monthly allowance will be equal to EUR 3.300. |
9.7 | Both the pension contribution due in case the Executive will not participate in the pension scheme applicable within the Company and the car allowance are taxable amounts. The Company will endeavour to pay the amounts tax efficiently, within the boundaries of the Dutch Governance Code. |
9.8 | Representation Allowance: The Executive will be entitled to a representation allowance of EUR 4,080 per year, payable in 12 monthly installments (of which EUR 1,080 is a net payment according to the fiscal rules 2010; the remainder is a gross payment). This allowance may be adjusted annually at the Companys discretion. The right to receive this allowance will end immediately if the Executive is suspended or relieved of duties, and also in case of incapacity for work, after a period of more than two (2) months. |
9.9 | Relocation Costs: The Executive will be eligible for relocation benefits equivalent to the Sara Lee Relocation Policy, including costs in relation with the family(members) of the Executive as a result of the relocation and movement of household belongings & furnishings from current residence to The Netherlands. The Company will provide additional details in a separate document. This shall also cover a one-off refurbishment allowance of the Executives house in NL of EUR 11.500 net, which will be payable within 30 days of the Starting date. |
10. INSURANCES
10.1 | The Company shall arrange a state of the art directors and officers liability insurance for the benefit of the Executive, including reimbursements of lawyers fees made by the Executive in case he is held liable by any third party or the Company, if the principal claim by such party is covered under the insurance. The conditions are stated in the policy, a copy of which will be provided to the Executive as soon as possible after signing. The costs for this insurance shall be for the account of the Company. |
8
10.2 | The Executive can participate in the companys Health Insurance scheme, which is equal to (rounded) EUR 160.a month per adult family member, at the Executives own expense. Children at the age until 18 are covered for free. |
10.3 | In case of termination of this Agreement by the Company for other reasons than due to an urgent cause, the Company will pay the Executive a monthly compensation to be used by the Executive for unemployment insurance. This monthly amount is limited to the maximum premium contribution under the legal system (WW maximum dagloon) of an employer in the Netherlands for unemployment benefits on a yearly basis and will only be due if and as long as the Executive is and remains unemployed. |
11. DISABILITY
11.1 | In case the Executive is unable to perform his duties under this agreement due to illness or other reasons which are not his fault, he shall inform the Company and its Supervisory Board immediately and provide the Company with the appropriate medical certificates. |
11.2 | During the first year of continuous or permanent disability the Company shall not terminate the Agreement. This agreement will not end if either of the parties explicitly agree on its continuation, or before expiry of the first twelve months the Executive provides a medical certificate of a physician stating that in all probability the Executive will again be able to perform his tasks without limitation within the next six months, in absence whereof article 11.8 shall apply. The physician providing such medical certificate has to be agreed upon between the parties. In case the parties do not agree on a physician, the district court at the business seat of the Company will be requested to determine an appropriate medical expert. |
11.3 | The Executive shall during the period mentioned under paragraph 11.2 be entitled to the continuation of all conditions set out in this Agreement. |
11.4 | In case the Executive dies during the term of this Agreement, his widow, or in lieu of a widow his dependent children, will receive continued payment of the Basis Fee for the month during which the Executive died and for the following twelve calendar months, including a pro rata payment of the AIP and LTI. |
11.5 | The Executive shall not be entitled to the board fee payment referred to in 11.1 above, if and to the extent that he can validly claim damages in connection with his inability to work from a third party on account of loss of income. In this event, the Company shall satisfy payment solely by means of an advanced payment on the compensation to be received from the third party and upon assignment by the Executive of his rights to damages vis-à-vis the third party concerned up to the total amount of advanced payments made. The advanced payments shall be set off by the Company if the compensation is paid or, as the case may be, in proportion. |
11.6 | The following shall be deducted from the board fee owed by the Company: |
(a) | the amounts of any cash benefit to which the Executive is entitled under any statutory or other insurance or from any social or other fund membership or which has been stipulated contractually or results from this agreement. These amounts include in any event payments made to the Executive pursuant to a any other disability scheme; |
9
(b) | the amounts of earned income for work which the Executive has performed elsewhere, despite his disability, other than for the Company, either under a contract of employment or otherwise. |
11.7 | The Company reserves the right to unilaterally amend the provisions set out in this paragraph 11 in the event the Company offers the Executive an alternative arrangement to adequately cover the consequences of the inability to work of members of the Board of Management that are engaged on the basis of a services agreement, provided that the rights of the Executive under such arrangement are covered at exactly the same level. |
11.8 | In case the continuous or permanent disability of the Executive has exceeded twelve months, this Agreement shall automatically terminate per that date and the Executive will be entitled to a termination fee of twelve monthly instalments of the Base Fee. |
11.9 | The Company will at its cost arrange for the Executive insurance coverage for the event of continuous or permanent disability of the Executive that lasts longer than twelve months, which insurance will cover the permanent loss of income (which income is set at the Base Fee). |
12. CONFIDENTIALITY
12.1 | The Executive has the duty to keep strictly confidential all matters concerning the Company disclosed to him in connection with his engagement with the Company, both during and after expiry of the Agreement, both regarding third parties and regarding other persons employed by the Company, save where those matters concern the latter category in view of the activities they perform for the Company. The Company Internal Code on Inside Information is applicable to the Executive. |
13. NO ADDITIONAL OCCUPATION
13.1 | Taking into account the Executives other approved positions within the group, the Executive has the duty to dedicate all his energy to the interests of the Company as and when required. The Executive shall refrain from accepting remunerated or time-consuming non-remunerated work activities with or for third parties not belonging to the Companys group, including but not limited to supervisory or non-executive directorships and board positions, or from doing business for his own account without prior explicit written consent of the Supervisory Board of the Company. |
14. DOCUMENTS
14.1 | The Executive shall not have nor keep in his possession any documents and/or correspondence and/or data carriers and/or copies thereof in any manner whatsoever, which belong to the Company or to affiliated companies, except insofar as and for as long as necessary for the performance of his work for the Company. In any event the Executive will be obliged to return to the Company immediately, without necessitating the need for any request to be made in this regard, any and all such documents and/or correspondence and/or data carriers and/or copies thereof at termination of this agreement or on suspension of the Executive from active duty for whatever reason. |
10
15. NON-COMPETITION
15.1 | The Executive shall throughout the duration of this Agreement and for a period of one year after termination hereof, not be engaged or involved in any manner, directly or indirectly, whether for the account of the Executive or for the account of others, in any (legal) person, institution or undertaking or other venture which conducts activities in the field of the coffee and tea business nor act as intermediary in relation to such activities in whatever manner directly. This obligation applies solely to the territory where the Executive carried out work activities for the benefit of the Company during the year immediately preceding the termination of this agreement. |
15.2 | Irrespective of how the Agreement terminates, the Executive shall without the prior written approval from the Company for a period of one year after termination of the Agreement not: |
(a) | induce any (legal) person, institution or undertaking, including suppliers and customers of the Company or of companies affiliated with the Company, to amend or terminate their business relationship with the Company or with companies affiliated with the Company; |
(b) | induce employees or persons who in the last year prior to the termination of the Agreement have or have had an employment agreement with the Company and/or companies affiliated with the Company, to give notice of termination of their employment agreement with the Company and/or companies affiliated with the Company and/or to employ these employees or persons. |
15.3 | This clause 15 does not apply in case of termination of this Agreement by the Executive in relation to an urgent cause on the part of the Company. |
16. INDEMNITY
16.1 | The Company will indemnify the Executive in respect of all claims, liabilities costs and expenses suffered or incurred by the Executive in his capacity as board member of the Company and arising from this Agreement, unless in case of wilful intent/misconduct (opzet) or deliberate recklessness (bewuste roekeloosheid). |
17. FINAL PROVISIONS
17.1 | This agreement can only be amended or supplemented to by means of a written document signed by both parties. This agreement supersedes all previous agreements and takes their place except for the terms and conditions related thereto, as amended. |
18. GOVERNING LAW
18.1 | This agreement is governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the Netherlands. |
In witness whereof, this agreement has been signed and executed in duplicate this August 30, 2011.
Sara Lee Corporation: | the Executive | |
/s/ Mr J. Bennink | /s/ Mr M Herkemij |
Chairman Executive Board
11
Exhibit 10.2
LONG-TERM INCENTIVE AWARDS
FISCAL YEARS 2012-2014
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS
Highlights
This document highlights in Question-and-Answer format the key features of the awards granted with respect to Sara Lee Corporations (SLC or the Company) 2012 fiscal year (FY12) and covering the Companys fiscal years 2012 2014. The following pages provide detailed information relating to grants of FY12 awards (the FY12 Award Program), which will be made from Company shares authorized under either the 1998 or 2002 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plans (each a Plan and together, the Plans).
The Company anticipates that the spin-off (the Anticipated Spin-Off) of its international beverage business (CoffeeCo) will be completed in FY12, as a result of which the Company will be split into two publicly traded companies: the first will consist of the Companys North American business (SLE 2.0), and the second will consist of the CoffeeCo business.
What is the purpose of the FY12 Award Program?
The Company has created the Program for fiscal years 2012-2014 in order to:
| Motivate and reward selected employees of the Company for achieving long-term financial results that are aligned with the Companys stockholders interests. |
| Reward selected employees of the Company through grants of equity-based long-term incentives in the form of one or more of stock options, restricted stock units or performance-based units for their continued commitment to the Company, including SLE 2.0 and CoffeeCo following the Anticipated Spin-Off, and efforts in connection with the Anticipated Spin-Off. |
What forms of awards are granted under the FY12 Award Program?
The Company may grant to employees who are selected to participate in the FY12 Award Program awards of one or more of stock options, restricted stock units or performance-stock units.
How will I know the terms of the awards granted to me under the FY12 Award Program?
Awards granted pursuant to the FY12 Award Program will be made from shares authorized under, and pursuant to the terms of, the Plans. Additional terms and conditions of your award(s), including the potential number of Company shares underlying the award, will be contained in a separate Grant Notice and Agreement with respect to each type of award granted to you. The Grant Notice and Agreement will be distributed electronically through your E*Trade account. You should retain a copy of your Grant Notice and Agreement along with other important legal documents.
The Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of the SLC Board of Directors (the Committee) is responsible for administering the FY12 Award Program and has full power and authority to interpret the Plans and the awards granted under the Plans. All decisions of the Committee are final and binding on all persons.
How do I confirm my acceptance of awards granted to me under the FY12 Award Program?
You must log into your E*Trade account and accept your grant(s) on-line. Instructions will be provided at the appropriate time. Sara Lee may from time to time modify the grant acceptance process and will notify you of any changes.
In addition, in order to receive your grant(s), you must electronically accept a Non-Competition/Non-Solicitation/Confidentiality Agreement even if you have previously accepted/signed the agreement. Signing the agreement is a condition of your receipt of your award(s) under the FY12 Award Program. You are advised to read the Non-Competition/Non-Solicitation/Confidentiality Agreement in its entirety before accepting it.
Are my awards subject to forfeiture under any circumstances?
Certain of the awards, or portions thereof, under the FY12 Award Program may be forfeited if your employment is terminated for certain reasons prior to the date the awards vest. In addition, as set forth in greater detail in your Grant Notice and Agreement(s) applicable to your award(s) under the FY12 Award Program, awards may be subject to forfeiture, adjustment and/or repayment if you engage in certain misconduct or the Company restates its financial statements within two years after the date in which the award vested and it is determined that your award should have been less than originally determined.
Key Features of Specific Awards
The subsections below highlight certain key features of awards that may be granted to participants under the FY12 Award Program. The descriptions below are intended only as a summary, are not intended to be complete and are qualified in their entirety by the terms of your individual Grant Notice and Agreement and the applicable Plan. You should review the terms of your Grant Notice and Agreement and the applicable Plan for the specific terms applicable to your award(s) under the FY12 Award Program.
Stock Options
What are the key features of stock options granted under the FY12 Award Program?
A stock option entitles the participant to purchase shares of SLC stock at a fixed price (i.e., the exercise price) for a period of time following the vesting of the stock options. The value of the stock option increases when the market value of SLC stock exceeds the exercise price of the stock option. When you exercise an option and pay the exercise price, you purchase and then own the SLC common shares you receive from the transaction.
Stock options granted under the FY12 Award Program will vest on August 31, 2014, subject to your continued employment with the Company or any of its subsidiaries, including SLE 2.0 following the Anticipated Spin-Off (collectively, the Sara Lee Companies), through such vesting date.
You do not have voting rights on stock options until you exercise the stock options to purchase actual shares. You do not receive dividends or dividend equivalents on stock options.
When may I exercise my stock options?
You may exercise your vested stock options that is, purchase any or all of the vested shares in your grant at the exercise price at any time between the vesting date and the expiration date of the stock option (subject to earlier expiration upon death, disability or other termination of employment, as described in the applicable Plan and your Grant Notice and Agreement). The minimum number of vested stock options that you may exercise at any time is 100 shares. For information on how to exercise your stock options, refer to your E*TRADE Stock Plans account or contact E*TRADE directly at 1-866-987-2339 or 1-678-319-7967.
2
How will the Anticipated Spin-Off affect stock option grants under the FY12 Award Program?
If you are granted stock options under the FY12 Award Program, at the time of the closing of the Anticipated Spin-Off, your stock options will become exercisable for shares of SLE 2.0 and will be adjusted to preserve the intrinsic value of the stock options prior to the occurrence of the Anticipated Spin-Off.
Restricted Stock Units
What are the key features of restricted stock units granted under the FY12 Award Program?
Restricted stock units (RSUs) are earned and converted into shares of Company common stock when they become vested. Subject to certain provisions for accelerated vesting as may be set forth in your Grant Notice and Agreement, the RSUs granted under the FY12 Award Program generally will vest on August 31, 2014, subject to your continued active service with the Sara Lee Companies through the vesting date. You do not have voting rights on RSUs until the RSUs are converted to actual shares.
Dividend equivalents will accrue on the RSUs (in cash, without interest) at the time dividends are otherwise paid to holders of Company common stock. These dividend equivalents are paid to you in cash after the RSUs have vested. At the Companys discretion, the dividend equivalents may be applied toward your tax withholding obligations.
How will the Anticipated Spin-Off affect RSU grants under the FY12 Award Program?
If you are granted RSUs under the FY12 Award Program, at the time of the closing of the Anticipated Spin-Off, your RSUs will be treated in accordance with the terms of your Grant Notice and Agreement.
Performance-Based Units
What are the key features of performance-based units granted under the FY12 Award Program?
Performance-based units (PSUs) are restricted stock units, with vesting and payout generally contingent upon both the Companys performance against established financial performance goals and your continued service through a specified date.
If you are granted a PSU award under the FY12 Award Program, the award will initially be granted as a target number of PSUs, which are first subject to a performance period that begins on July 1, 2011 and ends on June 30, 2012. The number of PSUs that will be deemed earned at the end of such performance period will be based on the Companys FY12 consolidated operating income (as described in greater detail in your applicable Grant Notice and Agreement). If the Companys consolidated operating income is achieved at the threshold level, then the number of PSUs earned will be 25% of the target number of PSUs. Similarly, if the Companys consolidated operating income is achieved at the maximum level, then the number of PSUs earned will be equal to 150% of the target number of PSUs granted. However, for any portion of the performance period that does not occur prior to the Anticipated Spin-Off, Company consolidated operating income will be calculated at target (or 100%) performance. You should read your Grant Notice and Agreement carefully to determine the specific terms applicable to your PSU grant, if applicable.
3
The Performance Goal and payout levels are as follows:
Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||
FY12 Consolidated Operating Income |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Payout of PSUs Granted |
25 | % | 100 | % | 150 | % |
(1) | The specific performance goals for the Consolidated Operating Income Targets were approved by the Committee and are contained in the minutes of the meeting at which the Program was approved. |
| Payouts between payout levels will be determined by linear interpolation |
| Results below Threshold will result in a zero payout |
The number of PSUs that are earned during the performance period will be subject to a vesting period ending on August 31, 2014, subject to your continued employment with the Sara Lee Companies (or CoffeeCo following the Anticipated Spin-Off for certain participants) through such date and will be settled on such date; provided that certain PSU awards may be subject to earlier vesting in connection with certain termination of employment or in connection with the Anticipated Spin-Off. Vested PSUs generally will be converted into shares of the Company (or CoffeeCo or SLE 2.0 following the Anticipated Spin-Off), subject to certain adjustments in connection with the Anticipated Spin-Off. As indicated above, you should review your Grant Notice and Agreement carefully for the specific terms applicable to your PSU award.
If you are granted a PSU award under the FY12 Award Program, during the performance period and the subsequent vesting period, dividend equivalents will accrue (in cash, without interest) on your behalf at the time dividends are otherwise paid to holders of Company common stock. These dividend equivalents are paid to you in cash if and after the PSUs vest. Amounts credited to the accrued dividend equivalent account at the end of the performance period are distributed in the same proportion as the PSUs that are earned. For example, if 150% of the PSUs are earned, then 150% of the balance in the accrued dividend equivalent account will be paid at the same time that shares of the Company (or CoffeeCo or SLE 2.0 following the Anticipated Spin-Off) are released. Dividend equivalents that were accrued but not earned based upon the actual performance results determined at the end of the performance period will be forfeited. At the Companys discretion, the dividend equivalents may be applied toward your tax withholding obligations.
Participants do not have voting rights on PSUs during the performance period.
How will the Anticipated Spin-Off affect PSU grants under the FY12 Award Program?
If you are granted PSUs under the FY12 Award Program, at the time of the closing of the Anticipated Spin-Off, your PSUs will be treated in accordance with the terms of your Grant Notice and Agreement.
4
Exhibit 10.3
SARA LEE CORPORATION
2002 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
PERFORMANCE-BASED RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT GRANT NOTICE AND AGREEMENT
(Form for North American employees; form for other employees substantially similar)
[INSERT PARTICIPANT NAME]
This Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit (PSU) Grant Notice and Agreement, made this November 4, 2011 (Award Date), by Sara Lee Corporation, a Maryland corporation (Company), to you is evidence of an award made under the Sara Lee Corporation 2002 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan (Plan) which is incorporated into this Grant Notice and Agreement by reference. A copy of the Plan has been provided to you and is also available from the Sara Lee Corporate Compensation Department.
1. Performance-Based Restricted Stock Unit Award. Subject to the restrictions, limitations, terms and conditions specified in the Plan and this Grant Notice and Agreement, the Company hereby awards to you as of the Award Date:
Performance Stock Units (PSUs)
which are considered Stock Awards under the Plan (the Award). The vesting of the Award is based both upon the Companys performance during the period from July 3, 2011 through June 30, 2012 (the Performance Period) and your continued service with the Company or any of its subsidiaries (collectively the Sara Lee Companies) from the Award Date through August 31, 2014 (the Vesting Period), subject in each case to the terms and conditions set forth in paragraph 3, and therefore the actual number of PSUs ultimately released, if any, shall be determined as of the last day of the Vesting Period (the PSU Vesting Date). Subject to paragraphs 2 and 11, the PSUs will be settled in shares of common stock of the Company.
2. Anticipated Spin-Off. The Company currently anticipates that prior to the PSU Vesting Date, it will complete a transaction to spin off (the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off) its international beverage business segment (CoffeeCo) separate from its North American business (SLE 2.0). If the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off occurs before the PSU Vesting Date, then the Award will be subject to adjustment in accordance with Article V of the Plan and paragraph 11 of this Grant Notice and Agreement and the PSUs will be settled in shares of SLE 2.0 common stock rather than shares of common stock of the Company. Where context permits, references in this Grant Notice and Agreement to the Company or the Sara Lee Companies will be to, and will include, SLE 2.0 from and following the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off.
3. Vesting of the Award.
(a) Performance-Based Vesting. A number of PSUs subject to the Award will become earned based on the Companys fiscal year 2012 Consolidated Operating Income (the 2012 Performance Goal), in accordance with the performance levels and payout percentages set forth in the table below (the Earned PSUs), provided that the vesting of such Earned PSUs shall be contingent on you remaining continuously employed with the Sara Lee Companies through the PSU Vesting Date pursuant to subparagraph (b) below. For the avoidance of doubt, your period of continuous employment for vesting purposes excludes any severance period.
Threshold | Target | Maximum | ||||||||||
Company Consolidated Operating Income for fiscal year 2012 |
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||
Number of PSUs earned based on actual Company Consolidated Operating Income for fiscal year 2012. |
25 | % | 100 | % | 150 | % |
(1) | The specific performance goals for the Consolidated Operating Income for fiscal year 2012 were approved by the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of the Companys Board of Directors and are contained in the minutes of the meeting at which the Program was approved. |
Notwithstanding the foregoing or anything to the contrary in this Grant Notice and Agreement or in the Plan, if the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off occurs prior to the end of the Performance Period, the number of Earned PSUs will be determined based on (i) actual performance of the 2012 Performance Goal through the closing date of the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off for the portion of the Companys fiscal year 2012 that occurs prior to such closing date and (ii) target performance for the portion of the 2012 fiscal year that has not yet occurred as of the closing of the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off.
For purposes of this Grant Notice and Agreement, Consolidated Operating Income means the Companys Adjusted Operating Income from continuing operations as disclosed in the Companys earnings press releases and filings with the SEC, as may be further adjusted by the Committee (as defined below) to (i) include or exclude the results of businesses acquired and/or divested during the measurement period, to the extent such results were included or excluded in the Companys annual operating plan, and/or (ii) prevent undue and/or unintended gain or loss. Adjusted Operating Income is a non-GAAP financial measure that adjusts operating income, as reported under U.S. GAAP, to exclude significant items and select other charges and gains. Significant items are material items that are not indicative of our core operating results and that are quantified and identified in the Companys publicly disclosed financial reports. Significant items vary each year and may include items such as charges for exit activities, impairment charges, tax costs and benefits resulting from the disposition of a business, gains or losses on the sale of discontinued operations and changes in tax valuation allowances.
(b) Service-Based Vesting. Provided that you have remained continuously employed with the Sara Lee Companies through the PSU Vesting Date, the Earned PSUs will vest and become payable to you on the PSU Vesting Date. The PSUs are not transferable by you by means of sale, assignment, exchange, pledge, or otherwise.
4. Acceptance of Terms and Conditions. By electronically acknowledging and accepting the Award, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions contained in this Grant Notice and Agreement and the Plan and any and all conditions established by the Company in connection with Awards issued under the Plan, and understand that the Award neither confers any legal or equitable right (other than those rights constituting the Award itself) against the Company directly or indirectly, nor does it give rise to any cause of action at law or in equity against the Company. In order to vest in the Award described in this Grant Notice and Agreement, you must have accepted the Award.
5. Dividend Equivalents. Subject to the restrictions, limitations and conditions as described in the Plan, dividend equivalents payable on the PSUs will be accrued (in cash, without interest) on your behalf at the time that dividends are otherwise paid to owners of the Companys common stock. Accrued dividend equivalents will be settled and paid at the same time as the vested PSUs are settled pursuant to the terms of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
2
6. Distribution of the Award. If the distribution is subject to tax withholding, such taxes will be settled by withholding cash and/or a number of shares with a market value not less than the amount of such taxes. Any cash from dividend equivalents remaining after withholding taxes are paid will be paid in cash to you. The net number of shares of the Company, or shares of SLE 2.0 following the closing of the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-off, to be distributed will be delivered to your electronic stock plan account as soon as practicable after the PSU Vesting Date. If withholding of taxes is not required, none will be taken and the gross number of shares and dividend equivalents will be distributed. You are personally responsible for the proper reporting and payment of all taxes related to this distribution.
7. Election to Defer Distribution. If the distribution is subject to U.S. tax law, you may elect to defer the distribution of all of the PSUs. Such election must be received by the Company in the form required by the Company no later than 30 days after the Award Date and is contingent upon the Companys allowing deferrals into the Sara Lee Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the Deferred Compensation Plan) at that time. The deferral, if elected, will result in the transfer of the PSUs into the Deferred Compensation Plans Stock Equivalent Fund in effect at the time the PSUs would have otherwise been distributed. The Deferred Compensation Plan rules will govern the administration of the Award beginning on the date the PSUs are credited to the Deferred Compensation Plan.
8. Death, Total Disability or Retirement. If you cease active employment (i.e., cease to be coded as active on the payroll system) with the Sara Lee Companies, because of your death or because you become Totally Disabled (as defined under the appropriate long term disability benefit plan, if applicable), the Award will continue to vest and be distributed to you or your estate at the same time as it is to other Participants pursuant to the terms of paragraph 6. In the case of your attaining age 55 or older and if you have at least 10 years of service with the Sara Lee Companies when your employment terminates or, in the case of your attaining age 65, regardless of service, the Award will continue to vest after your termination. These provisions apply only to the Award under this Grant Notice and Agreement; other awards may have different provisions.
9. Involuntary Termination, Voluntary Termination and Non-Severance Event Termination. The following provisions apply only to the Award granted under this Grant Notice and Agreement; other awards may have different provisions
(a) Involuntary Termination. If your employment with the Sara Lee Companies is terminated on or prior to the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off and you are eligible to receive severance benefits under the Sara Lee Corporation Severance Plan for Corporate Officers, the Severance Pay Plan, the Severance Pay Plan for Executives, the Severance Pay Plan for Certain Events or any other written severance plan of the Company (collectively, a Severance Event Termination), you will be eligible to receive a prorated distribution that is determined by multiplying the Earned PSUs covered by the Award by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months of your active service from Award Date through the date your employment terminates (not including the severance period), and the denominator of which is the number of months from Award Date through the PSU Vesting Date. Any shares underlying such prorated PSUs will be distributed to you at the earlier of (i) the PSU Vesting Date or (ii) the date the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off is completed.
In the event that the division, business unit or business segment of the Company or, after the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off, SLE 2.0 to which at least 80% of your time is dedicated or from which you are on leave of absence is sold, closed, spun off or otherwise divested and, as a result of such transaction, your employment with the Sara Lee Companies or SLE 2.0 is terminated, all PSUs will vest as of the closing date of the transaction and be distributed as soon as practicable after the closing date of the transaction, unless otherwise determined by the Company or SLE 2.0. This provision does not apply with respect to the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off or any transaction that would be considered a Change of Control as defined in Article X of the Plan.
3
(b) Voluntary Termination and Non-Severance Event Termination. If your employment terminates for reasons other than those described above (i.e., you voluntarily terminate employment with the Sara Lee Companies or your employment is terminated by the Sara Lee Companies and you are not eligible for severance pay under any of the Companys severance plans), then the Award shall be canceled on the date your employment terminates.
10. Non-Competition/Non-Solicitation/Confidentiality. As a condition to your receipt of this Award, you must electronically accept a Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreement. Please carefully read the Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreement in its entirety and feel free to have your lawyer review it prior to accepting it.
11. Adjustment of the Award. In the event of any change in the capital structure of the Company (including but not limited to a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, combination or exchange of securities, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, spin-off, split off, liquidation or other distribution of any or all of the assets of the Company to stockholders, other than normal cash dividends) or any change in any rights attendant to any class of authorized securities of the Company, which for the avoidance of doubt, shall include the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off (an Adjustment Event), the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of the Companys Board of Directors (the Committee) shall make proportionate adjustments with respect to the number and class of securities subject to the Award to reflect such Adjustment Event and to maintain the Awards intrinsic and fair value; provided, that the Committee shall retain discretion with respect to how any such proportionate adjustments shall be made. The decision of the Committee regarding any such adjustment shall be final, binding and conclusive.
12. Forfeiture/Adjustment. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Grant Notice and Agreement to the contrary, you may forfeit all or a portion of the Award and/or be required to repay the Company, or you may be entitled to an increased Award, upon the occurrence of any of the following events.
(a) Misconduct. If you engage in any activity contrary or harmful to the interests of the Company, including but not limited to: (i) competing, directly or indirectly (either as owner, employee or agent), with any of the businesses of the Company, (ii) violating any Company policies, (iii) soliciting any present or future employees or customers of the Company to terminate such employment or business relationship(s) with the Company, (iv) disclosing or misusing any confidential information regarding the Company, or (v) participating in any activity not approved by the Board of Directors of the Company which could reasonably be foreseen as contributing to or resulting in a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in the Plan) (such activities to be collectively referred to as wrongful conduct), then (A) the Award, to the extent it remains restricted, shall terminate automatically on the date on which you first engaged in such wrongful conduct, (B) if the wrongful conduct occurred within six months of the PSU Vesting Date, you shall pay to the Company in cash any financial gain you realized from the vesting of the PSU, and (C) if the wrongful conduct occurred after the PSU has been deferred in the Deferred Compensation Plan and prior to the deferred payment date, you shall forfeit the deferred PSU and the Award shall terminate automatically on the date on which you first engaged in such wrongful conduct. For purposes of this paragraph, financial gain shall equal the fair market value of the shares of the Company common stock on the PSU Vesting Date, multiplied by the number of PSUs actually distributed pursuant to the Award, reduced by any taxes paid in countries other than the United States which taxes are not otherwise eligible for refund from the taxing authorities. By accepting this PSU, you consent to and authorize the Company to deduct from any amounts payable by the Company to you, any amounts you owe to the Company under this paragraph. This right of set-off is in addition to any other remedies the Company may have against you for breach of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
4
(b) Restatement of Financial Results. This paragraph 12(b) applies to you only if you are an officer of the Company, as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, at the time you received the Award (Officer Participant). If you are an Officer Participant and you vest in an Award (including if the distribution of an incentive award is deferred pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan), which vesting was predicated upon the Company achieving certain financial results (the Original Amount), and within two years after the PSU Vesting Date the Company restates its financial statements due to material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the securities laws (such restated financial statements, the Restated Financials), then the vested amount of the Award shall be recalculated based on the Restated Financials (the Adjusted Amount). If the Original Amount is greater than the Adjusted Amount, then on the date on which the Company files the Restated Financials with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), any vested portion of the Award that has not yet been distributed automatically shall be reduced by an amount equal to (i) the Original Amount, less (ii) the Adjusted Amount. If the Adjusted Amount is greater than the Original Amount, then on the date on which the Company files the Restated Financials with the SEC, any vested amount that has not yet been distributed automatically shall be increased by an amount equal to (A) the Adjusted Amount, less (B) the Original Amount. If the incentive award already has been distributed then, as soon as practicable after the date on which the Company files the Restated Financials with the SEC, (x) you shall pay to the Company, in cash, any financial gain you realized from the vesting of the incentive award that is attributable to the excess of the Original Amount over the Adjusted Amount, if the Original Amount is greater than the Adjusted Amount, or (y) the Company shall pay to you, in cash, an amount equal to the excess of the Adjusted Amount over the Original Amount, if the Adjusted Amount is greater than the Original Amount. No interest will be due to or paid by the Company or you to the other with respect to any such true up payment. If you elected to defer any portion of an incentive award pursuant to the Deferred Compensation Plan and an adjustment under this paragraph 12(b) is required before the deferral payment date, then your account under the Deferred Compensation Plan shall be credited or charged so that the deferred award equals the Adjusted Amount. The Committee may determine, in its discretion and based on the circumstances leading to the Companys filing of Restated Financials with the SEC, that any recoupment or payment under this paragraph 12(b) is not practical and may elect to forego the application of this paragraph 12(b).
13. Rights as a Stockholder. You will have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any PSUs until and unless you receive shares of the Company following vesting of these PSUs.
14. Conformity with the Plan. The Award is intended to conform in all respects with, and is subject to, all applicable provisions of the Plan Any inconsistencies between this Grant Notice and Agreement and the Plan shall be resolved in accordance with the terms of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
15. Interpretations. Any dispute, disagreement or question which arises under, or as a result of, or in any way relates to the interpretation, construction or application of the Plan or this Grant Notice and Agreement will be determined and resolved by the Committee or its delegate. Such determination or resolution by the Committee or its delegate will be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes.
16. Employment Rights. Nothing in the Plan or this Grant Notice and Agreement confers on you any right to continue in the employ of the Sara Lee Companies or in any way affects the Sara Lee Companies right to terminate your employment without prior notice any time for any reason.
5
17. Consent to Transfer Personal Data. By accepting the Award, you voluntarily acknowledge and consent to the collection, use, processing and transfer of personal data as described in this paragraph. You are not obliged to consent to such collection, use, processing and transfer of personal data. The Sara Lee Companies hold certain personal information about you, that may include your name, home address and telephone number, fax number, email address, sex, beneficiary information, age, language skills, date of birth, social security number or other employee identification number, job title, employment or severance contract, current wage and benefit information, tax-related information, plan or benefit enrollment forms and elections, option or benefit statements, any shares of stock or directorships in the Company, details of all options or any other entitlements to shares of stock awarded, canceled, purchased, vested, unvested or outstanding in your favor, for the purpose of managing and administering the Plan (Data). The Sara Lee Companies will transfer Data amongst themselves as necessary for the purpose of implementation, administration and management of your participation in the Plan, and the Sara Lee Companies may further transfer Data to any third parties assisting the Sara Lee Companies in the implementation, administration and management of the Plan. These recipients may be located throughout the world, including the United States. You authorize them to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data, in electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering and managing your participation in the Plan, including any requisite transfer of such Data as may be required for the administration of the Plan and/or the subsequent holding of shares of stock on your behalf to a broker or other third party with whom you may elect to deposit any shares of stock acquired pursuant to the Plan. You may, at any time, review Data, require any necessary amendments to it or withdraw the consents herein in writing by contacting the Company.
18. Miscellaneous.
(a) Modification. The Award is documented by the minutes of the Committee and or as approved by the CEO for non-corporate officers, which records are the final determinant of the number of PSUs granted and the conditions of this grant. The Committee may amend or modify the Award in any manner to the extent that the Committee would have had the authority under the Plan initially to grant such PSUs, provided that no such amendment or modification shall impair your rights under this Grant Notice and Agreement without your consent. Except as in accordance with the two immediately preceding sentences and paragraph 19, this Grant Notice and Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented only by an instrument in writing signed by both parties hereto.
(b) Governing Law. All matters regarding or affecting the relationship of the Company and its stockholders shall be governed by the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland. All other matters arising under this Grant Notice and Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Illinois, including matters of validity, construction and interpretation. You and the Company agree that all claims in respect of any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Grant Notice and Agreement shall be heard or determined in any state or federal court sitting in Chicago, Illinois, and you agree to submit to the jurisdiction of such courts, to bring all such actions or proceedings in such courts and to waive any defense of inconvenient forum to such actions or proceedings. A final judgment in any action or proceeding so brought shall be conclusive and may be enforced in any manner provided by law.
(c) Successors and Assigns. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Grant Notice and Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and permitted assigns of the parties hereto whether so expressed or not.
(d) Severability. Whenever feasible, each provision of this Grant Notice and Agreement will be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Grant Notice and Agreement is held to be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision will be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
6
19. Amendment. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or this Grant Notice and Agreement to the contrary, the Award may be amended by the Company without the consent of you, including but not limited to modifications to any of the rights granted to you under the Award, at such time and in such manner as the Company may consider necessary or desirable to reflect changes in law.
7
Exhibit 10.4
SARA LEE CORPORATION
1998 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE STOCK PLAN
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT GRANT NOTICE AND AGREEMENT
(North American employees; form for other employees substantially similar)
[INSERT PARTICIPANT NAME]
This Restricted Stock Unit (RSU) Grant Notice and Agreement, made this November 4, 2011 (Award Date), by Sara Lee Corporation, a Maryland corporation (the Company) to you is evidence of an award made under the Sara Lee Corporation 1998 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan (Plan) which is incorporated into this Grant Notice and Agreement by reference. A copy of the Plan has been provided to you and is also available from the Sara Lee Corporate Compensation Department.
1. Restricted Stock Unit Award. Subject to the restrictions, limitations, terms and conditions specified in the Plan and this Grant Notice and Agreement, the Company hereby awards to you as of the Award Date:
restricted stock units (RSUs)
which vest as follows:
100% on August 31, 2014 (the Vesting Date)
which are considered Stock Awards under the Plan (the Award) and, subject to paragraphs 2 and 10, will be settled in shares of common stock of the Company. Subject to paragraphs 2 and 10, each RSU that becomes vested pursuant to the terms set forth in this Grant Notice and Agreement will be settled for one share of common stock of the Company. Subject to paragraphs 7 and 8 below, if you are continuously employed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries (collectively the Sara Lee Companies) from the Award Date until the Vesting Date, the Award will vest as indicated above on the Vesting Date. For the avoidance of doubt, your period of continuous employment for purposes of vesting excludes any severance period. The RSUs are not transferable by you by means of sale, assignment, exchange, pledge or otherwise.
2. Anticipated Spin-Off. The Company currently anticipates that prior to the Vesting Date, it will complete a transaction to spin off (the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off) its international beverage business segment (CoffeeCo) separate from its North American business (SLE 2.0). If the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off occurs before the Vesting Date, then this RSU will be subject to adjustment in accordance with Article V of the Plan and paragraph 10 of this Grant Notice and Agreement and the RSUs will be settled in shares of SLE 2.0 common stock rather than shares of common stock of the Company. Where context permits, references in this Grant Notice and Agreement to the Company or the Sara Lee Companies will be to, and will include, SLE 2.0 from and following the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off.
3. Acceptance of Terms and Conditions. By electronically acknowledging and accepting the Award, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions contained in this Grant Notice and Agreement and the Plan and any and all conditions established by the Company in connection with awards issued under the Plan, and understand that the Award neither confers any legal or equitable right (other than those rights constituting the Award itself) against the Company directly or indirectly, nor does it give rise to any cause of action at law or in equity against the Company. In order to vest in the Award described in this Grant Notice and Agreement, you must have accepted the Award.
RSU agreement for SLE 2.0 Employees
4. Dividend Equivalents. Subject to the restrictions, limitations and conditions as described in the Plan, dividend equivalents payable on the RSUs will be accrued (in cash, without interest) on your behalf at the time that dividends are otherwise paid to owners of the Companys common stock. Accrued dividend equivalents will be settled and paid at the same time as the vested RSUs are settled pursuant to the terms of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
5. Distribution of the Award. If the distribution is subject to tax withholding, such taxes will be settled by withholding cash and/or a number of shares with a market value not less than the amount of such taxes. Any cash from dividend equivalents remaining after withholding taxes are paid will be paid in cash to you. The net number of shares of the Companys common stock to be distributed will be delivered to your electronic stock plan account as soon as practicable after the Vesting Date. If withholding of taxes is not required, none will be taken and the gross number of shares and dividend equivalents will be distributed. You are personally responsible for the proper reporting and payment of all taxes related to this distribution.
6. Election to Defer Distribution. If the distribution is subject to U.S. tax law, you may elect to defer the distribution of all of the RSUs. Such election must be received by the Company in the form required by the Company no later than 30 days after the Award Date and is contingent upon the Companys allowing deferrals into the Sara Lee Corporation Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (the Deferred Compensation Plan) at that time. The deferral, if elected, will result in the transfer of the RSUs into the Deferred Compensation Plans Stock Equivalent Fund in effect at the time the RSUs would have otherwise been distributed. The Deferred Compensation Plan rules will govern the administration of the Award beginning on the date the RSUs are credited to the Deferred Compensation Plan.
7. Death, Total Disability or Retirement. If you cease active employment (i.e., cease to be coded as active on the payroll system) with the Sara Lee Companies, because of your death or because you become Totally Disabled (as defined under the appropriate long-term disability benefit plan if applicable), the Award will vest immediately and be distributed to you or your estate as soon as practical. In the case of your attaining age 55 or older and if you have at least 10 years of service with the Sara Lee Companies when your employment terminates, or in the case of your attaining age 65 regardless of service, the Award will continue to vest after your termination. These provisions apply only to the Award under this Grant Notice and Agreement; other awards may have different provisions.
8. Involuntary Termination, Voluntary Termination and Non-Severance Event Termination. The following provisions apply only to the Award granted under this Grant Notice and Agreement; other awards may have different provisions:
(a) Involuntary Termination. If your employment with the Sara Lee Companies is terminated and you are eligible to receive severance benefits under the Sara Lee Corporation Severance Plan for Corporate Officers, the Severance Pay Plan, the Severance Pay Plan for Executives, the Severance Pay Plan for Certain Events or any other written severance plan of the Company (collectively, a Severance Event Termination), you will receive, as of the date of termination, a prorated portion of the non-vested shares determined by multiplying the number of shares subject to the Award by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months of your active service from Award Date through the date your employment terminates (not including the severance period), and the denominator of which is the number of months from Award Date through the Vesting Date.
2
In the event that the division, business unit or business segment of the Company or, after the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off, SLE 2.0 to which at least 80% of your time is dedicated or from which you are on leave of absence is sold, closed, spun off or otherwise divested and, as a result of such transaction, your employment with the Sara Lee Companies or SLE 2.0 is terminated, all RSUs will vest as of the closing date of the transaction and be distributed as soon as practicable after the closing date of the transaction, unless otherwise determined by the Company or SLE 2.0. This provision does not apply with respect to the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off or any transaction that would be considered a Change of Control as defined in Article X of the Plan.
(b) Voluntary Termination and Non-Severance Event Termination. If your employment terminates for reasons other than those described above (i.e., you voluntarily terminate employment with the Sara Lee Companies or your employment is terminated by the Sara Lee Companies and you are not eligible for severance pay under any of the Companys severance plans), then the Award shall be canceled on the date your employment terminates.
9. Non-Competition/Non-Solicitation/Confidentiality. As a condition to your receipt of this Award, you must electronically accept a Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreement. Please carefully read the Non-Competition Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreement in its entirety and feel free to have your lawyer review it prior to accepting it.
10. Adjustment of the Award. In the event of any change in the capital structure of the Company (including but not limited to a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, combination or exchange of securities, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, spin-off, split off, liquidation or other distribution of any or all of the assets of the Company to stockholders, other than normal cash dividends) or any change in any rights attendant to any class of authorized securities of the Company, which, for the avoidance of doubt, shall include the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off (an Adjustment Event), the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of the Companys Board of Directors (the Committee) shall make proportionate adjustments with respect to the number and class of securities subject to the Award to reflect such Adjustment Event and to maintain the Awards intrinsic and fair value; provided, that the Committee shall retain discretion with respect to how any such proportionate adjustments shall be made. The decision of the Committee regarding any such adjustment shall be final, binding and conclusive.
11. Forfeiture. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Grant Notice and Agreement to the contrary, if you engage in any activity inimical, contrary or harmful to the interests of the Company, including but not limited to: (a) competing, directly or indirectly (either as owner, employee or agent), with any of the businesses of the Company, (b) violating any Company policies or breaching any non-competition, non-solicitation, or confidentiality agreement with the Company (or refusing to sign any such agreement if it is required as a condition to your employment or continued employment with the Company), (c) soliciting any present or future employees or customers of the Company to terminate such employment or business relationship(s) with the Company, (d) disclosing or misusing any confidential information regarding the Company, or (e) participating in any activity not approved by the Board of Directors of the Company which could reasonably be foreseen as contributing to or resulting in a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in the Plan) (such activities to be collectively referred to as wrongful conduct), then (i) the Award, to the extent it remains restricted, shall terminate automatically on the date on which you first engaged in such wrongful conduct, (ii) if the misconduct occurred within six months of a Vesting Date, you shall pay to the Company in cash any financial gain you realized from the vesting of the RSU, and (iii) if the misconduct occurred after the RSU has been deferred in the Deferred Compensation Plan and prior to the deferred payment date, you shall forfeit the deferred RSU and the Award shall terminate automatically on the date on which you first engaged in such wrongful conduct. For purposes of this paragraph, financial gain shall equal, the fair market value of the Company common stock on the Vesting Date, multiplied by the number of RSUs actually distributed pursuant to the Award, reduced by any taxes paid in countries other than the United States which taxes are not otherwise eligible for refund from the taxing authorities. By accepting this RSU, you consent to and authorize the Company to deduct from any amounts payable by the Company to you, any amounts you owe to the Company under this paragraph. This right of set-off is in addition to any other remedies the Company may have against you for breach of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
3
12. Rights as a Stockholder. You will have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any RSUs until and unless shares of common stock have been issued to you.
13. Conformity with the Plan. The Award is intended to be consistent with all applicable provisions of the Plan. Any inconsistencies between this Grant Notice and Agreement and the Plan shall be resolved in accordance with the terms of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
14. Interpretations. Any dispute, disagreement or question which arises under, or as a result of, or in any way relates to the interpretation, construction or application of the Plan or this Grant Notice and Agreement will be determined and resolved by the Committee or its delegate. Such determination or resolution by the Committee or its delegate will be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes.
15. Employment Rights. Nothing in the Plan or this Grant Notice and Agreement confers on you any right to continue in the employ of the Sara Lee Companies or in any way affects the Sara Lee Companies right to terminate your employment without prior notice any time for any reason.
16. Consent to Transfer Personal Data. By accepting the Award, you voluntarily acknowledge and consent to the collection, use, processing and transfer of personal data as described in this paragraph. You are not obliged to consent to such collection, use, processing and transfer of personal data. The Sara Lee Companies hold certain personal information about you, that may include your name, home address and telephone number, fax number, email address, sex, beneficiary information, age, language skills, date of birth, social security number or other employee identification number, job title, employment or severance contract, current wage and benefit information, tax-related information, plan or benefit enrollment forms and elections, option or benefit statements, any shares of stock or directorships in the Company, details of all options or any other entitlements to shares of stock awarded, canceled, purchased, vested, unvested or outstanding in your favor, for the purpose of managing and administering the Plan (Data). The Sara Lee Companies will transfer Data amongst themselves as necessary for the purpose of implementation, administration and management of your participation in the Plan, and the Sara Lee Companies may further transfer Data to any third parties assisting the Sara Lee Companies in the implementation, administration and management of the Plan. These recipients may be located throughout the world, including the United States. You authorize them to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data, in electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering and managing your participation in the Plan, including any requisite transfer of such Data as may be required for the administration of the Plan and/or the subsequent holding of shares of stock on your behalf to a broker or other third party with whom you may elect to deposit any shares of stock acquired pursuant to the Plan. You may, at any time, review Data, require any necessary amendments to it or withdraw the consents herein in writing by contacting the Company.
17. Miscellaneous.
(a) Modification. The Award is documented by the minutes of the Committee and or as approved by the CEO for non-corporate officers, which records are the final determinant of the number of RSUs granted and the conditions of this grant. The Committee may amend or modify the Award in any manner to the extent that the Committee would have had the authority under the Plan initially to grant such RSUs, provided that no such amendment or modification shall impair your rights under this Grant Notice and Agreement without your consent. Except as in accordance with the two immediately preceding sentences and paragraph 18, this Grant Notice and Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented only by an instrument in writing signed by both parties hereto.
4
(b) Governing Law. All matters regarding or affecting the relationship of the Company and its stockholders shall be governed by the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland. All other matters arising under this Grant Notice and Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Illinois, including matters of validity, construction and interpretation. You and the Company agree that all claims in respect of any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Grant Notice and Agreement shall be heard or determined in any state or federal court sitting in Chicago, Illinois, and you agree to submit to the jurisdiction of such courts, to bring all such actions or proceedings in such courts and to waive any defense of inconvenient forum to such actions or proceedings. A final judgment in any action or proceeding so brought shall be conclusive and may be enforced in any manner provided by law.
(c) Successors and Assigns. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Grant Notice and Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and permitted assigns of the parties hereto whether so expressed or not.
(d) Severability. Whenever feasible, each provision of this Grant Notice and Agreement will be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Grant Notice and Agreement is held to be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision will be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
18. Amendment. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or this Grant Notice and Agreement to the contrary, the Award may be amended by the Company without the consent of you, including but not limited to modifications to any of the rights granted to you under the Award, at such time and in such manner as the Company may consider necessary or desirable to reflect changes in law.
5
Exhibit 10.5
SARA LEE CORPORATION
1998 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan
Stock Option Grant Notice and Agreement
[INSERT PARTICIPANT NAME]
Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) is pleased to confirm that you have been granted a stock option (an Option), effective as of November 4, 2011 (the Grant Date), as provided in this Stock Option Grant Notice and Agreement (the Grant Notice and Agreement):
1. Option Right. Subject to paragraphs 3 and 10, your Option is to purchase, on the terms and conditions set forth below, the following number of shares (the Option Shares) of the Companys common stock, par value $.01 per share or, following the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off (as defined below), shares of SLE 2.0 (as defined below) common stock (in the case of either Company common stock or SLE 2.0 common stock, the Common Stock), at the exercise price specified below (the Exercise Price).
Number of Option Shares |
Exercise Price Per Option |
which vests as follows:
100% on August 31, 2014 (the Vesting Date)
2. Acceptance of Terms and Conditions. By electronically acknowledging and accepting this Option, you agree to be bound by the terms and conditions contained in this Grant Notice and Agreement, the 1998 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plan (the Plan) and any and all conditions established by the Company in connection with Options issued under the Plan, and understand that this Option neither confers any legal or equitable right (other than those rights constituting the Option itself) against the Company directly or indirectly, nor does it give rise to any cause of action at law or in equity against the Company. In order to vest in the Option described in this Grant Notice and Agreement, you must accept this Option.
3. Anticipated Spin-Off. The Company currently anticipates that prior to the Vesting Date, it will complete a transaction to spin off (the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off) its international beverage business segment (CoffeeCo) separate from its North American business (SLE 2.0), pursuant to which this Option will be subject to adjustment in accordance with Article V of the Plan and paragraph 10 of this Grant Notice and Agreement. Where context permits, references in this Grant Notice and Agreement to the Company or the Sara Lee Companies will be to, and will include, SLE 2.0 from and following the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off.
4. Option. This Option is a non-qualified stock option that is intended to conform in all respects with the Plan, a copy of which has been provided to you, and the provisions of which are incorporated herein by reference. This Option is not intended to qualify as an incentive stock option within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.
5. Expiration Date. This Option expires on the tenth anniversary of the Grant Date (the Expiration Date), subject to earlier expiration upon your death, disability or other termination of employment, as provided below.
6. Vesting. This Option may be exercised only to the extent it has vested. Subject to paragraphs 7 and 8 below, if you are continuously employed by the Company or any of its subsidiaries (collectively, the Sara Lee Companies) from the Grant Date until the Vesting Date, this Option will vest on the Vesting Date. For the avoidance of doubt, your period of continuous employment for purposes of vesting excludes any severance period. This Option will not vest upon completion of the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off but, upon such event, will be assumed by and become an obligation of SLE 2.0.
7. Death, Total Disability or Retirement. If you cease active employment (i.e., cease to be coded as active on the payroll system) with the Sara Lee Companies, because of your death or because you become Totally Disabled (as defined under the appropriate long term disability benefit plan if applicable), your Option Shares will vest immediately and the last date on which your Option Shares may be exercised will be the earlier of five years from the date of death or disability or the Expiration Date. In the case of your attaining age 55 or older and if you have at least 10 years of service with the Sara Lee Companies when your employment terminates, or in the case of your attaining age 65 regardless of service, the Option will continue to vest after your termination and the last date on which your Option Shares may be exercised will be the Expiration Date. These provisions apply only to the Option granted herein; other awards may have different provisions.
8. Involuntary Termination, Voluntary Termination and Non-Severance Event Termination. The following provisions apply only to the Option granted herein; other awards may have different provisions.
(a) Involuntary Termination. If your employment with the Sara Lee Companies is terminated and you are eligible to receive severance benefits under the Sara Lee Corporation Severance Plan for Corporate Officers, the Severance Pay Plan, the Severance Pay Plan for Executives, the Severance Pay Plan for Certain Events or any other written severance plan of the Company (collectively, a Severance Event Termination), this Option will vest on a prorated basis, as of the date your employment terminates, determined by multiplying the Option Shares by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of months of your active service from Grant Date through the date your employment terminates (not including the severance period), and the denominator of which isthe number of months from Grant Date through the Vesting Date. The last day on which this Option may be exercised is the earlier of (i) the Expiration Date or (ii) 90 days following the date your employment terminates.
In the event that the division, business unit or business segment of the Company or, after the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off, SLE 2.0 to which at least 80% of your time is dedicated or from which you are on leave of absence is sold, closed, spun off or otherwise divested and, as a result of such transaction, your employment with the Sara Lee Companies or SLE 2.0 is terminated, all Options Shares will vest as of the closing date of the transaction, subject to your continuous employment through such closing date, and be exercisable for six months following the closing date of the transaction, , unless otherwise determined by the Company or SLE 2.0. This provision does not apply with respect to the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off or any transaction that would be considered a Change of Control as defined in Article X of the Plan.
(b) Voluntary Termination and Non-Severance Event Termination. If your employment terminates for reasons other than those described in 7 and 8(a), (i.e., you voluntarily terminate your employment with the Sara Lee Companies or your employment is terminated by the Sara Lee Companies and you are not eligible for severance pay under the Companys severance plans), then to the extent this Option has vested prior to the date of your termination, this Option shall remain exercisable until 90 days after the date your employment terminated. Vesting of this Option ends on the date your employment terminates.
2
9. Non-Competition/Non-Solicitation/Confidentiality. As a condition to your receipt of this Award, you must electronically accept a Non-Competition, Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreement. Please carefully read the Non-Competition,Non-Solicitation and Confidentiality Agreement in its entirety and feel free to have your lawyer review it prior to accepting it.
10. Adjustment of the Award. In the event of any change in the capital structure of the Company (including but not limited to a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, combination or exchange of securities, merger, consolidation, recapitalization, spin-off, split off, liquidation or other distribution of any or all of the assets of the Company to stockholders, other than normal cash dividends) or any change in any rights attendant to any class of authorized securities of the Company, which, for the avoidance of doubt, shall include the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off (an Adjustment Event), the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of the Companys Board of Directors (the Committee) shall make proportionate adjustments with respect to the number and class of securities subject to this Option to reflect such Adjustment Event and to maintain the Options intrinsic and fair value; provided, that the Committee shall retain discretion with respect to how any such proportionate adjustments shall be made. The decision of the Committee regarding any such adjustment shall be final, binding and conclusive.
11. Exercise. After this Option has vested, it may be exercised in whole or in part for the number of shares specified with the Companys designated agent by remitting full payment of the Exercise Price for such number of Option Shares. A number of exercise alternatives are available through the Companys agent. This Option will be considered exercised on the date that (a) your execution of the exercise with the agent and (b) your payment of the Exercise Price has been received by the agent. Your written acceptance of the grant as well as the exercise of any portion of this Option will be considered your acceptance of all terms and conditions specified in this Grant Notice and Agreement.
12. Forfeiture. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Grant Notice and Agreement to the contrary, if you engage in any activity inimical, contrary or harmful to the interests of the Company, including but not limited to: (a) competing, directly or indirectly (either as owner, employee or agent), with any of the businesses of the Company, (b) violating any Company policies, (c) soliciting any present or future employees or customers of the Company to terminate such employment or business relationship(s) with the Company, (d) disclosing or misusing any confidential information regarding the Company, or (e) participating in any activity not approved by the Board of Directors of the Company which could reasonably be foreseen as contributing to or resulting in a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in the Plan) (such activities to be collectively referred to as wrongful conduct), then (i) this Option, to the extent it remains unexercised, shall terminate automatically on the date on which you first engaged in such wrongful conduct and (ii) you shall pay to the Company in cash any financial gain you realized from exercising all or a portion of this Option within the six month period immediately preceding such wrongful conduct. For purposes of this paragraph, financial gain shall equal, on each date of exercise during the six month period immediately preceding such wrongful conduct, the difference between the fair market value of the Common Stock on the date of exercise and the Exercise Price, multiplied by the number of shares of Common Stock purchased pursuant to that exercise (without reduction for any shares of Common Stock surrendered or attested to) reduced by any taxes paid in countries other than the United States to acquire and or exercise and which taxes are not otherwise eligible for refund from the taxing authorities. By accepting this Option, you consent to and authorize the Company to deduct from any amounts payable by the Company to you, any amounts you owe to the Company under this paragraph. This right of set-off is in addition to any other remedies the Company may have against you for your breach of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
3
13. Rights as a Stockholder. You will have no rights as a stockholder with respect to any Option Shares until and unless you receive ownership of Option Shares upon exercise of this Option.
14. Transferability of Option Shares. You may not offer, sell or otherwise dispose of any Common Stock covered by the Option in a way which would: (i) require the Company to file any registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (or any similar filing under state law or the laws of any other country) or to amend or supplement any such filing or (ii) violate or cause the Company to violate the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder, any other state or federal law, or the laws of any other country. The Company reserves the right to place restrictions on Common Stock received by you pursuant to this Option.
15. Conformity with the Plan. This Option is intended to conform in all respects with, and is subject to, all applicable provisions of the Plan. Any inconsistencies between this Grant Notice and Agreement and the Plan shall be resolved in accordance with this Grant Notice and Agreement.
16. Interpretations. Any dispute, disagreement or question which arises under, or as a result of, or in any way relates to the interpretation, construction or application of the Plan or this Grant Notice and Agreement will be determined and resolved by the Committee or its authorized delegate. Such determination or resolution by the Committee or its authorized delegate will be final, binding and conclusive for all purposes.
17. Employment Rights. Nothing in the Plan or this Grant Notice and Agreement confers on any Participant any right to continue in the employ of the Sara Lee Companies or in any way affects the Sara Lee Companies right to terminate your employment without prior written notice any time for any reason.
18. Consent to Transfer Personal Data. By accepting this Option, you voluntarily acknowledge and consent to the collection, use, processing and transfer of personal data as described in this paragraph. You are not obliged to consent to such collection, use, processing and transfer of personal data. The Sara Lee Companies hold certain personal information about you, that may include your name, home address and telephone number, fax number, email address, sex, beneficiary information, age, date of birth, social security number or other employee identification number, job title, employment or severance contract, current wage and benefit information, tax-related information, plan or benefit enrollment forms and elections, option or benefit statements, any shares of stock or directorships in the Sara Lee Companies, details of all options or any other entitlements to shares of stock awarded, canceled, purchased, vested, unvested or outstanding in your favor, for the purpose of managing and administering the Plan (Data). The Sara Lee Companies will transfer Data amongst themselves as necessary for the purpose of implementation, administration and management of your participation in the Plan, and the Sara Lee Companies may further transfer Data to any third parties assisting the Sara Lee Companies in the implementation, administration and management of the Plan. These recipients may be located throughout the world, including the United States. You authorize them to receive, possess, use, retain and transfer the Data, in electronic or other form, for the purposes of implementing, administering and managing your participation in the Plan, including any requisite transfer of such Data as may be required for the administration of the Plan and/or the subsequent holding of shares of stock on your behalf to a broker or other third party with whom you may elect to deposit any shares of stock acquired pursuant to the Plan. You may, at any time, review Data, require any necessary amendments to it or withdraw the consents herein in writing by contacting the Company.
4
19. Miscellaneous.
(a) Modification. The grant of this Option is documented by the minutes of the Committee and/or as approved by the CEO for non-corporate officers, which records are the final determinant of the number of Option Shares granted and the conditions of this grant. The Committee may amend or modify this Option in any manner to the extent that the Committee would have had the authority under the Plan initially to grant such Option, provided that no such amendment or modification shall impair your rights under this Grant Notice and Agreement without your consent. Except as in accordance with the two immediately preceding sentences and paragraph 20, this Grant Notice and Agreement may be amended, modified or supplemented only by an instrument in writing signed by both parties hereto.
(b) Governing Law. All matters regarding or affecting the relationship of the Company and its stockholders shall be governed by the General Corporation Law of the State of Maryland. All other matters arising under this Grant Notice and Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Illinois, including matters of validity, construction and interpretation. You and the Company agree that all claims in respect of any action or proceeding arising out of or relating to this Grant Notice and Agreement shall be heard or determined in any state or federal court sitting in Chicago, Illinois, and you agree to submit to the jurisdiction of such courts, to bring all such actions or proceedings in such courts and to waive any defense of inconvenient forum to such actions or proceedings. A final judgment in any action or proceeding so brought shall be conclusive and may be enforced in any manner provided by law.
(c) Successors and Assigns. Except as otherwise provided herein, this Grant Notice and Agreement will bind and inure to the benefit of the respective successors and permitted assigns of the parties hereto whether so expressed or not.
(d) Severability. Whenever feasible, each provision of this Grant Notice and Agreement will be interpreted in such manner as to be effective and valid under applicable law, but if any provision of this Grant Notice and Agreement is held to be prohibited by or invalid under applicable law, such provision will be ineffective only to the extent of such prohibition or invalidity, without invalidating the remainder of this Grant Notice and Agreement.
20. Amendment. Notwithstanding anything in the Plan or this Grant Notice and Agreement to the contrary, this Option may be amended by the Company without your consent, including but not limited to modifications to any of the rights granted to you under this Option, at such time and in such manner as the Company may consider necessary or desirable to reflect changes in law.
5
Exhibit 10.6
SARA LEE CORPORATION
ANNUAL INCENTIVE PLAN FOR EMPLOYEES OF THE NORTH AMERICAN BUSINESS
SEGMENT FISCAL YEAR 2012 (FY12)
(AIP descriptions for other business segments substantially similar)
Capitalized terms used but not defined are defined in Attachment 1.
Purpose
The objective of this Sara Lee Corporation Annual Incentive Plan for Employees of the North American Business Segment (the FY12 AIP) is to advance the interests of Sara Lee Corporation (Sara Lee or the Company) and, in particular, the interests of Sara Lees North American business segment (SLE 2.0) separate from its international beverage business segment, in anticipation of the spin-off during Sara Lees fiscal year 2012 of such international beverage business segment (the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off) by:
a) | Rewarding financial performance of SLE 2.0 that contributes to increased shareholder value; |
b) | Measuring the effectiveness of SLE 2.0 operating performance, sales and capital management; |
c) | Continuing to provide significant rewards for exceptional performance. |
Where context permits, references in this FY12 AIP to the Company or Sara Lee will be to, and will include, SLE 2.0 from and following the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off.
Incentive Opportunity & Performance Objectives
Attachment 2 [attached to each individual business segment Plan description]shows the FY12 AIP Target and Maximum bonus payout opportunities at the various salary grades. Notwithstanding the bonus opportunity levels set forth in Attachment 2, during FY12, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, adjust the FY12 target payout levels applicable to certain Participants, including adjustments to organize Participants by salary bands rather than by salary grades.
The following applies to the FY12 AIP generally:
| Performance measures are approved by the Committee at the beginning of each year (Performance Measures). |
| Specific financial performance goals within the selected Performance Measures are established at the beginning of the Incentive Plan Year. The financial performance goals related to the Incentive Plan Year are contained in the table below (Performance Goals). The Performance Goals have been approved by the Committee. |
| The FY12 Performance Measures are: |
| Operating Income of SLE 2.0 40% of target bonus opportunity |
| Net Sales of SLE 2.0 40% of target bonus opportunity |
| Average Working Capital of SLE 2.0 20% of target bonus opportunity |
| When expressed as a percentage of target bonus opportunity, the weighting of each Performance Measure is the same for each salary grade and/or salary band, as may be applicable during FY12. A summary of FY12 Performance Measures and the corresponding incentive opportunities for Participants are shown in Attachment 3 [attached to each individual business segment Plan description], which incentive opportunities are subject to adjustment during FY12 as described above under this section, Incentive Opportunity & Performance Objectives. |
| Maximum payout opportunity is 150% of target bonus opportunity, and threshold payout opportunity is 25% of target bonus opportunity. |
Performance Period
All objectives are measured over a one-year performance period, which is the Incentive Plan Year.
Performance Levels
Maximum A high level of performance exceeding targeted performance and requiring stretch achievement of the Performance Goal beyond the Annual Operating Plan (AOP) level.
Target Target level of performance equivalent to achievement at the AOP level.
Threshold Performance that just achieves an acceptable level of results warranting incentive recognition. For FY12, threshold performance is defined as the prior fiscal years actual result for each of the Performance Measures: SLE 2.0 Operating Income, SLE 2.0 Net Sales and SLE 2.0 Average Working Capital.
Incentive Award Payout Levels
Performance Goals *
Performance Level |
Performance Goal (Operating Income) |
Performance Goal (Net Sales) |
Performance Goal (Average Working Capital) |
Payout Level as a % of Target Bonus Opportunity | ||||
Maximum |
(1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | ||||
Above Target |
(1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | ||||
Target |
(1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | ||||
Below Target |
(1) | (1) | (1) | (1) | ||||
Threshold |
(1) | (1) | (1) | (1) |
* | Each Performance Goal represents, and will be computed based solely upon, the businesses that will comprise the SLE 2.0 business at the time the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off is completed. |
(1) | The specific performance goals for fiscal year 2012 were approved by the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee of the Companys Board of Directors and are contained in the minutes of the meeting at which the Program was approved. |
Attachment 4 graphically displays the payout curve for all three Performance Measures applicable to this FY12 AIP. Straight-line interpolation is used for calculating results between performance levels.
2
Incentive Award Payments
Incentive award payments are distributed as soon as practicable after the Incentive Plan Year results have been publicly announced and the individual awards requiring the review and approval of the Committee have been approved at the Committees August 2012 meeting; provided that in no event will any incentive award payments under the FY12 AIP be made later than the 15th day of the third month following the close of the Incentive Plan Year. A Participant must be an employee of Sara Lee or SLE 2.0, as applicable, or any respective subsidiary thereof, on the last day of the fiscal year in order to be eligible to receive any incentive award.
Administrative Provisions
The Committee and the Chief Executive Officer shall administer this FY12 AIP jointly and their decisions are final. The Executive Vice President Human Resources, or anyone serving in the equivalent position, and Chief Financial Officer of the Company will be responsible for the administrative procedures governing this FY12 AIP, including ensuring the existence of approved Performance Measures and specific performance goals and the presentation to the Committee for its approval at the end of FY12 of the performance results under this FY12 AIP. The following administrative procedures shall govern:
a) | The Committee will approve individual incentive awards for all corporate officers, those executives in salary grade 38 and above and individuals in salary band Senior Vice President I and above. For individuals who participate in the Sara Lee Performance-Based Incentive Plan (the PBIP), individual incentive awards are coordinated with and subject to the terms, conditions, maximums and limitations of the PBIP (which, for those individuals, is incorporated into this FY12 AIP by reference), with the AIP incentive award being one factor to be considered by the Committee in exercising its negative discretion to reduce the maximum award under the PBIP. The CEO and his or her direct reports may approve all other incentive awards. |
b) | Any awards earned under this FY12 AIP will be paid in cash. Participants paid in the U.S. and subject to taxation in the U.S. may elect to defer part or all of their incentive awards pursuant to the terms and conditions of the Sara Lee Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. |
c) | In the Committees sole discretion, a new Participant who begins participation during the Incentive Plan Year may be eligible for a pro-rata incentive award from the date of entry into this FY12 AIP. A new Participant should have been actively employed in a bonus-eligible role for at least one calendar quarter of the Incentive Plan Year in order to receive consideration for a pro-rata incentive award. |
d) | In the case of death, Disability, Total Disability, or retirement under a Sara Lee or SLE 2.0 retirement plan during the Incentive Plan Year, a Participant or the Participants estate is eligible for a pro-rata incentive award based upon the Participants period of active service (i.e., coded as active on the payroll system) during the Incentive Plan Year and an assessment of actual achievement of the Performance Goals. Any such pro-rata award will be distributed at the same time as awards are distributed to active Participants. |
e) | A Participant who is involuntarily terminated and who subsequently receives severance pay under a Sara Lee or SLE 2.0 severance plan may be eligible for a pro-rata incentive award based on active service through the date of the Participants termination of employment. The amount of any pro-rata incentive award will be determined based on the amount of time the Participant was actively employed during the Incentive Plan Year and an assessment of actual achievement of the Performance Goals. Any such pro-rata award will be distributed at the same time as awards are distributed to active Participants. |
3
f) | Unless otherwise approved by the Committee or the Chief Executive Officer of Sara Lee or SLE 2.0, as applicable, and subject in any case to subparagraph (g), any Participant who voluntarily terminates, or who is involuntarily terminated and does not receive severance pay, regardless of the Participants eligibility for retirement status, during the Incentive Plan Year will not be entitled to any incentive award attributable to the Incentive Plan Year. |
g) | In the event that the division, business unit or business segment of Sara Lee or SLE 2.0 to which at least 80% of a Participants time is dedicated or from which the Participant is on leave of absence is sold, closed, spun off or otherwise divested and, as a result of such transaction, the Participants employment with Sara Lee or SLE 2.0 or any of their respective subsidiaries is terminated, as of the closing date of such transaction the Participant will be entitled to a pro-rata incentive award based on the Participants active service through the date of Participants termination of employment. The amount of any pro-rata incentive award will be determined based upon the amount of time the Participant was actively employed during the Incentive Plan Year and an assessment of actual achievement of the Performance Goals. Any such pro-rata award will be distributed no later than the date the incentive award is distributed to active Participants. |
h) | Notwithstanding anything contained in this document to the contrary, a Participant may be entitled to receive either an increased or reduced incentive award payment, or no incentive award payment whatsoever, attributable to the Incentive Plan Year upon the occurrence of any of the following events: |
1) | If any Participant engages in any activity contrary or harmful to the interests of the Company (or, in each case, SLE 2.0), including but not limited to: (1) competing, directly or indirectly (either as owner, employee or agent), with any of the businesses of the Company, (2) violating any Company policies, (3) soliciting any present or future employees or customers of the Company to terminate such employment or business relationships(s) with the Company, (4) disclosing or misusing any confidential information regarding the Company, or (5) participating in any activity not approved by the Board which could reasonably be foreseen as contributing to or resulting in a Change of Control of the Company (as defined in the Sara Lee 1998 and 2002 Long-Term Incentive Stock Plans), then the Participant will not be entitled to any incentive award attributable to the Incentive Plan Year. |
2) | This paragraph (h)(2) applies only to those Participants who are officers of the Company, as defined in Rule 16a-1(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the Incentive Plan Year and who participate in any Sara Lee Executive Management Long-Term Incentive Program (each such Participant, an Officer Participant). If an Officer Participant receives an incentive award payment that was predicated upon the Company achieving certain Performance Measures (the Original Payout) and, within two years after the date of such Original Payout, the Company restates its financial statements due to material noncompliance with the financial reporting requirements under the securities laws (such restated financial statements, the Restated Financials), then the amount of the incentive award payment for such Officer Participant shall be recalculated based on the Restated Financials (such recalculated amount, the Restated Amount). If the Original Payout is greater than the Restated Amount, then the Company shall be entitled to recoup from such Officer Participant, and such Officer Participant shall pay to the Company, in cash, an amount equal to (1) the Original Payout, less (2) the Restated Amount. If the Restated Amount is greater than the Original Payout, then the Company shall pay to the Officer Participant |
4
an amount equal to (i) the Restated Amount, less (ii) the Original Payout. Any such payment or recoupment shall be due and payable within 90 days after the date on which the Company files the Restated Financials with the Securities and Exchange Commission. If an Officer Participant elected to defer part or all of their Original Payout pursuant to the Sara Lee Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, then the Officer Participants account under such Deferred Compensation Plan automatically shall be credited or charged so that the amount deferred in connection with such incentive award payment equals the Restated Amount. No interest will be due to or paid by the Company or the Officer Participant to the other with respect to any true up payment. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee may determine, in its discretion and based on the circumstances leading to the filing of the Restated Financials, that recoupment or payment under this paragraph (h)(2) of the Restated Amount is not practical and may elect to forego the application of this paragraph (h)(2). |
i) | Performance results under this FY12 AIP will be measured in accordance with the Definitions in Attachment 1. |
j) | Performance results and Eligible Earnings will be used to determine the incentive award payment. |
k) | Any Participant who is employed as of the end of the Incentive Plan Year shall be entitled to receive an incentive award payment regardless of whether the Participant resigns or is terminated between the end of the Incentive Plan Year and the date the incentive awards are distributed. |
l) | Sara Lee reserves the right to offset against any incentive award payment owed by Sara Lee to a terminating or terminated Participant any amounts to which Sara Lee has a claim of right. |
m) | Except for participant deferral elections made under the Sara Lee Executive Deferred Compensation Plan (which shall be construed to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, and the Treasury Regulation guidance thereunder (the Code)), the terms of the AIP shall be construed and paid in such manner as to satisfy the short-term deferral exception to the application of Section 409A of the Code as set forth in Subsections (a)(4) and (b)(4) of Treasury Regulations Section 1.409A-1. |
n) | Nothing herein shall be construed as an agreement or commitment to employ any Participant or to employ a Participant for any fixed period of time or constitute a commitment by Sara Lee, SLE 2.0, or any of their respective subsidiaries, that any Participant will continue to receive an incentive award or will continue as a Participant in this FY12 AIP. |
o) | The Committee reserves the right to amend, modify, interpret or terminate this FY12 AIP or awards to be paid under this FY12 AIP at any time for any reason. Specifically, an individuals target bonus opportunity may be modified during FY12 in the Committees discretion and the performance criteria may be adjusted by the Committee for extraordinary and similar items that prevent undue and/or unintended gain or loss; provided that, for any incentive awards under the AIP to individuals participating in the PBIP, any adjustments will be subject to the terms, conditions, maximums and limitations under the PBIP. |
p) | The Committee may delegate certain administrative responsibilities to the Chief Executive Officer except for the following: |
1) | Any actions affecting the Chief Executive Officer, and other elected officers of Sara Lee or SLE 2.0, as applicable, |
5
2) | Approval of corporate Performance Goals and certification of performance results relative to such standards following the end of the Incentive Plan Year, and |
3) | Approval of any substantive changes or amendments to this FY12 AIP. |
6
Attachment 1
Definitions
(a) | Average Working Capital is a 13-point average of Core Working Capital as of the period-end for fiscal 2011 Period 12 and the period-end balances for each of the twelve periods of fiscal 2012. |
(b) | Board means the Sara Lee Board of Directors prior to the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off and means the Board of Directors of SLE 2.0 from and following the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off. |
(c) | Committee is the Compensation and Employee Benefits Committee or other committee of the Sara Lee Board (prior to, or SLE 2.0 from and after, the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off) as may be appointed by the Board. |
(d) | Core Working Capital means the Companys net accounts receivable plus net inventories less accounts payable, excluding intercompany receivable and intercompany accounts; provided, however, that for purposes of this FY12 AIP, only the Core Working Capital that is attributable to the businesses that will comprise the SLE 2.0 business at the time of the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off will be used to measure achievement of the Average Working Capital performance goal. |
(e) | Disability is as defined under the applicable Sara Lee Long Term Disability Plan or the specific Sara Lee sponsored long-term disability plan under which the Participant is covered. |
(f) | Eligible Earnings mean regular salary or wages paid to the Participant from July 1, 2011 through June 30, 2012. It does not include allowances, reimbursements, commissions, other incentives, severance, lump sums, awards, deferred compensation and compensation attributable to the exercise of stock options or other forms of long-term incentive compensation. |
(g) | Incentive Plan Year is the Companys fiscal year 2012 starting on July 3, 2011 and ending on June 30, 2012. |
(h) | Net Sales means that portion of the Companys Adjusted Net Sales, as disclosed in the Companys earnings press releases and filings with the SEC, that is attributable to the businesses that will comprise the SLE 2.0 business at the time of the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off, as may be further adjusted by the Committee to (i) include or exclude the results of businesses acquired and/or divested during the measurement period, to the extent such results were included or excluded in the Companys annual operating plan, (ii) adjust for currency exchange rates used in the Companys annual operating plan, and/or (iii) prevent undue and/or unintended gain or loss. |
(i) | Operating Income means that portion of the Companys Adjusted Operating Income from continuing operations that is attributable to the businesses that will comprise the SLE 2.0 business at the time of the Anticipated CoffeeCo Spin-Off (which will be calculated using such businesses operating segment income), as disclosed in the Companys earnings press releases and filings with the SEC, with regard to SLE 2.0, as may be further adjusted by the Committee (as defined below) to (i) include or exclude the results of businesses acquired and/or divested during the measurement period, to the extent such results were included or excluded in the Companys annual operating plan, and/or (ii) prevent undue and/or unintended gain or loss. Adjusted Operating Income is a non-GAAP financial measure that adjusts operating income, as reported under U.S. GAAP, to exclude Significant Items and select other charges and gains. |
7
(j) | Participant means an employee in the Companys North American business segments in salary grades 22 through and including 50 or salary bands Manager through Chief Executive Officer, subject to adjustments during FY12 pursuant to the terms of this FY12 AIP. (Employees in grades 22 through 27 and salary bands Manager through Senior Manager eligible for sales incentive plans are excluded from this FY12 AIP.) |
(k) | Significant Items mean those items that are reported by the Company in its annual report in the table entitled Impact of Significant Items on Income from Continuing Operations and Net Income and that meet the Controllers criteria for materiality and that are not indicative of our core operating results. Significant items vary each year and may include items such as charges for exit activities, impairment charges, tax costs and benefits resulting from the disposition of a business, gains or losses on the sale of discontinued operations and changes in tax valuation allowances. |
(l) | Total Disability is as defined under the Sara Lee Key Executive Long Term Disability Plan under which the Participant is covered. |
8
Attachment 4
FY12 AIP PAYOUT CURVE FOR ALL PERFORMANCE MEASURES
9
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, | Marcel Smits, certify that: |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011. |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) | Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) | Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) | Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d) | Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Dated: February 7, 2012
/s/ Marcel Smits,
Chief Executive Officer
2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION BY CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, | Mark A. Garvey, certify that: |
1. | I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011. |
2. | Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report. |
3. | Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report. |
4. | The registrants other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a15(f) and 15d15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
a) | designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; |
b) | designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; |
c) | evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and |
d) | disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter (the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. | The registrants other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions): |
a) | all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and |
b) | any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial reporting. |
Dated: February 7, 2012
/s/ Mark A. Garvey,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
2
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Marcel Smits, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 7, 2012
/s/ Marcel Smits,
Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32.2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT
TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Sara Lee Corporation (the Company) for the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Mark Garvey, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §1350, as adopted pursuant to §906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that:
(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and
(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 7, 2012
/s/ Mark Garvey,
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Financial Instruments (Summary Of The Notional Values Of Derivative Instruments) (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
6 Months Ended | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jul. 02, 2011
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Interest Rate Swap [Member]
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Interest Rate Swap [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Cross Currency Swaps [Member]
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Cross Currency Swaps [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Commitments To Purchase Foreign Currencies [Member]
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Commitments To Purchase Foreign Currencies [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Commitments To Sell Foreign Currencies [Member]
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Commitments To Sell Foreign Currencies [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Commodity Future Contracts [Member]
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Commodity Future Contracts [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Commodity Options Contracts [Member]
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Commodity Options Contracts [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Minimum [Member]
Interest Rate Swap [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Minimum [Member]
Cross Currency Swaps [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Minimum [Member]
Commitments To Purchase Foreign Currencies [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Minimum [Member]
Commitments To Sell Foreign Currencies [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Minimum [Member]
Commodity Future Contracts [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Minimum [Member]
Commodity Options Contracts [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Maximum [Member]
Interest Rate Swap [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Maximum [Member]
Cross Currency Swaps [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Maximum [Member]
Commitments To Purchase Foreign Currencies [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Maximum [Member]
Commitments To Sell Foreign Currencies [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Maximum [Member]
Commodity Future Contracts [Member]
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Maximum [Member]
Commodity Options Contracts [Member]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Swap Contracts, Notional Values | $ 150 | $ 584 | $ 295 | [1] | $ 813 | [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign Currency Contracts, Notional Values | 2,632 | [1] | 2,757 | [1] | 2,629 | [1] | 2,754 | [1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commodity Contracts, Notional Values | 148 | [2] | 193 | [2] | 53 | [3] | 77 | [3] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Investments Hedges | $ 4,256 | $ 4,052 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Hedge Coverage (Number of months) | 17.5 | 17.5 | [1] | 0.2 | [1] | 0.2 | [1] | 1.0 | [2] | 2.0 | [3] | 17.5 | 17.5 | [1] | 17.6 | [1] | 17.6 | [1] | 10.00 | [2] | 2.0 | [3] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Exit, Disposal And Other Restructuring Activities (2011 Actions Narrative) (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Restructuring 2011 Actions [Member]
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Restructuring 2011 Actions [Member]
Discontinued Operations [Member]
|
|
Restructuring Reserve Disclosures [Line Items] | ||||||
Restructuring charges | $ 5 | $ 33 | $ 23 | $ 36 | $ 141 | $ 100 |
Planned employee terminations | 960 | |||||
Employee terminations | 500 |
Financial Instruments (Fair Value Of The Long-Term Debt, Including The Current Portion) (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jul. 02, 2011
|
---|---|---|
Financial Instruments [Abstract] | ||
Long-term debt, including current portion, Fair Value | $ 2,375 | $ 2,411 |
Long-term debt, including current portion, Carrying Amount | $ 2,325 | $ 2,408 |
Exit, Disposal And Other Restructuring Activities (2012 Actions Narrative) (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
|
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items] | ||||
Restructuring charges | $ 5 | $ 33 | $ 23 | $ 36 |
Restructuring 2012 Actions [Member]
|
||||
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items] | ||||
Restructuring charges | 196 | |||
Planned employee terminations | 420 | |||
Employee terminations | 170 | |||
Minimum [Member] | Restructuring 2012 Actions [Member]
|
||||
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items] | ||||
Restructuring charges expected to be recognized | 525 | |||
Maximum [Member] | Restructuring 2012 Actions [Member]
|
||||
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items] | ||||
Restructuring charges expected to be recognized | 550 | |||
Exit, Disposal And Other Restructuring Actions [Member] | Minimum [Member] | Restructuring 2012 Actions [Member]
|
||||
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items] | ||||
Restructuring charges expected to be recognized | 480 | |||
Exit, Disposal And Other Restructuring Actions [Member] | Maximum [Member] | Restructuring 2012 Actions [Member]
|
||||
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items] | ||||
Restructuring charges expected to be recognized | $ 505 |
Segment Information (Summary Of Business Segment Assets) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jul. 02, 2011
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||||||||
Net assets held for sale | $ 155 | $ 2,405 | ||||||
Other | 4,011 | [1] | 2,916 | [1] | ||||
Assets | 8,186 | 9,533 | ||||||
North American Retail [Member]
|
||||||||
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||||||||
Assets | 1,263 | [2] | 1,313 | [2] | ||||
North American Foodservice And Specialty Meats [Member]
|
||||||||
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||||||||
Assets | 475 | 499 | ||||||
Coffee & Tea [Member]
|
||||||||
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||||||||
Assets | 2,220 | 2,334 | ||||||
Australian Bakery [Member]
|
||||||||
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||||||||
Assets | 62 | 66 | ||||||
Total Business Segments [Member]
|
||||||||
Segment Reporting Information [Line Items] | ||||||||
Assets | $ 4,020 | $ 4,212 | ||||||
|
Financial Instruments (Information Relating To Cash Flow Hedges, Net Investment Hedges, Fair Value Hedges And Other Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments) (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
|||||||||||||||||
Cash Flow Derivatives [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) | $ 4 | [1] | $ 32 | [1] | $ 199 | [1] | $ (13) | [1] | ||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings | 12 | [1],[2] | 16 | [1],[2] | 208 | [1],[2] | (33) | [1],[2] | ||||||||||||
Amount of ineffectiveness recognized in earnings | (2) | [3],[4] | (1) | [3],[4] | (3) | [3],[4] | ||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months | (3) | 5 | (6) | 13 | ||||||||||||||||
Net Investment Derivatives [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) | 252 | [1] | 178 | [1] | 427 | [1] | (227) | [1] | ||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized from OCI into earnings | (198) | [5] | 60 | [5] | (207) | [5] | 51 | [5] | ||||||||||||
Fair Value Derivatives [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in earnings | 2 | [6] | 4 | [6] | ||||||||||||||||
Amount of Hedged Item gain (loss) recognized in earnings | 2 | [6] | 3 | [6] | 2 | [6] | 3 | [6] | ||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts [Member] | Cash Flow Derivatives [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) | 4 | [1] | 1 | [1] | ||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings | (2) | [1],[2] | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Contracts [Member] | Fair Value Derivatives [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in earnings | 2 | [6] | 4 | [6] | ||||||||||||||||
Amount of Hedged Item gain (loss) recognized in earnings | 2 | [6] | 3 | [6] | 2 | [6] | 3 | [6] | ||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Contracts [Member] | Cash Flow Derivatives [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) | 1 | [1] | 17 | [1] | 197 | [1] | (31) | [1] | ||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings | 11 | [1],[2] | 13 | [1],[2] | 204 | [1],[2] | (34) | [1],[2] | ||||||||||||
Amount of ineffectiveness recognized in earnings | (2) | [3],[4] | (2) | [3],[4] | (4) | [3],[4] | ||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months | (4) | (3) | (3) | (1) | ||||||||||||||||
Foreign Exchange Contracts [Member] | Net Investment Derivatives [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) | 252 | [1] | 178 | [1] | 427 | [1] | (227) | [1] | ||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized from OCI into earnings | (198) | [5] | 60 | [5] | (207) | [5] | 51 | [5] | ||||||||||||
Commodity Contracts [Member] | Cash Flow Derivatives [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI) | 3 | [1] | 11 | [1] | 2 | [1] | 17 | [1] | ||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) reclassified from AOCI into earnings | 1 | [1],[2] | 3 | [1],[2] | 4 | [1],[2] | 3 | [1],[2] | ||||||||||||
Amount of ineffectiveness recognized in earnings | 1 | [3],[4] | 1 | [3],[4] | ||||||||||||||||
Amount of gain (loss) expected to be reclassified into earnings during the next twelve months | 1 | 8 | (3) | 14 | ||||||||||||||||
Cost Of Sales [Member] | Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in earnings | 27 | (4) | 34 | (19) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost Of Sales [Member] | Foreign Exchange Contracts [Member] | Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in earnings | 20 | (2) | 15 | (19) | ||||||||||||||||
Cost Of Sales [Member] | Commodity Contracts [Member] | Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in earnings | 7 | (2) | 19 | |||||||||||||||||
SG&A [Member] | Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in earnings | (36) | (32) | (75) | 34 | ||||||||||||||||
SG&A [Member] | Foreign Exchange Contracts [Member] | Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in earnings | (41) | (33) | (75) | 31 | ||||||||||||||||
SG&A [Member] | Commodity Contracts [Member] | Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments [Member]
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value, Balance Sheet Grouping, Financial Statement Captions [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||||||
Amount of derivative gain (loss) recognized in earnings | $ 5 | $ 1 | $ 3 | |||||||||||||||||
|
Financial Instruments (Tables)
|
6 Months Ended | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Financial Instruments [Abstract] | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Summary Of The Notional Values Of Derivative Instruments |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair Value Of The Long-Term Debt, Including The Current Portion |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Location And Amounts Of Derivative Fair Values In Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Information Relating To Cash Flow Hedges, Net Investment Hedges, Fair Value Hedges And Other Derivatives Not Designated As Hedging Instruments |
|
|
Exit, Disposal And Other Restructuring Activities (2010 Actions Narrative) (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
Jul. 03, 2010
Restructuring 2010 Actions [Member]
|
|
Restructuring Reserve Disclosures [Line Items] | |||||
Restructuring charges | $ 5 | $ 33 | $ 23 | $ 36 | $ 85 |
Planned employee terminations | 900 | ||||
Number of employees remaining to be terminated | 40 |
Discontinued Operations (Cash Flow Impacts Of Discontinued Operations) (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
6 Months Ended | |
---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
|
Discontinued Operations [Abstract] | ||
Cash flow from operating activities | $ (46) | $ 199 |
Cash flow from (used in) investing activities | 1,424 | 1,940 |
Cash flow from (used in) financing activities | (1,378) | (2,139) |
Increase (decrease) in net cash of discontinued operations | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year | ||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
Discontinued Operations (International Operations) (Details)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | 3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
USD ($)
|
Jan. 01, 2011
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2011
USD ($)
|
Jan. 01, 2011
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Discontinued Operations [Member]
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Shoe Care Business [Member]
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2010
Non-Indian Insecticides [Member]
EUR (€)
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Non-Indian Insecticides [Member]
USD ($)
|
Oct. 10, 2011
Spanish Bakery [Member]
EUR (€)
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Spanish Bakery [Member]
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2011
French Refrigerated Dough Business [Member]
EUR (€)
|
Jan. 01, 2011
Air Care Products [Member]
USD ($)
|
Jan. 01, 2011
Air Care Products [Member]
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2011
European Bakery [Member]
USD ($)
|
Oct. 01, 2011
European Bakery [Member]
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2011
European Bakery [Member]
USD ($)
|
|
Income Statement, Balance Sheet and Additional Disclosures by Disposal Groups, Including Discontinued Operations [Line Items] | ||||||||||||||||
Increase in total impairment charge | $ 8 | |||||||||||||||
Impairment charges | 14 | 32 | 379 | |||||||||||||
Pretax impairment charge recognized | 371 | |||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations, sales price per signed agreement | 154 | 115 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operation, sales price per considered binding offer | 115 | |||||||||||||||
Liability for deposit received for sale of business | 152 | |||||||||||||||
Tax benefit recognized on impairment charges | 38 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds on business dispositions | 54 | |||||||||||||||
Pretax gain on sale | $ 540 | $ 886 | $ 802 | $ 1,141 | $ 256 | $ 15 | $ 15 | $ 270 | $ 15 | $ 15 |
Exit, Disposal And Other Restructuring Activities (Prior Actions Narrative) (Details) (Restructuring Actions Prior To 2010 [Member], USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
Dec. 31, 2011
|
---|---|
Restructuring Actions Prior To 2010 [Member]
|
|
Restructuring Cost and Reserve [Line Items] | |
Accrued liabilities | $ 18 |
Income Taxes (Tax Expense And Effective Tax Rate) (Details) (USD $)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
3 Months Ended | 6 Months Ended | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
Jan. 01, 2011
|
|
Income Taxes [Abstract] | ||||
Income before income taxes | $ 83 | $ 129 | $ 173 | $ 227 |
Income tax expense (benefit) | $ 50 | $ 41 | $ 174 | $ 78 |
Effective tax rate | 60.50% | 31.60% | 100.50% | 34.40% |
Basis Of Presentation
|
6 Months Ended | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
|
||||
Basis Of Presentation [Abstract] | ||||
Basis Of Presentation |
The consolidated financial statements for the quarter and six months ended December 31, 2011 and January 1, 2011 have not been audited by an independent registered public accounting firm, but in the opinion of Sara Lee Corporation (corporation or company), these financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position, operating results, and cash flows. The results of operations for the six months ended December 31, 2011 are not necessarily indicative of the operating results to be expected for the full fiscal year. The Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet as of July 2, 2011 has been derived from the corporation's audited financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011. The fresh bakery, refrigerated dough and foodservice beverage businesses in North America as well as the international household and body care and European bakery businesses are presented as discontinued operations in the corporation's consolidated financial statements. See Note 6 – "Discontinued Operations" for additional information regarding these discontinued operations. Unless stated otherwise, any reference to income statement items in these financial statements refers to results from continuing operations. The interim consolidated financial statements included herein have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission. Although the corporation believes the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading, certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in annual financial statements prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations. The preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make use of estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, revenues and expenses and certain financial statement disclosures. Actual results could differ from these estimates. These unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the corporation's Form 10-K for the year ended July 2, 2011 and other financial information filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These financial statements consider subsequent events through the date of filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The corporation's fiscal year ends on the Saturday closest to June 30. Fiscal 2012 ends on June 30, 2012. The second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2012 ended on December 31, 2011 and the second quarter and first six months of fiscal 2011 ended on January 1, 2011. Each of the quarters was a thirteen-week period and each of the six month periods was a twenty-six week period. Fiscal 2012 and fiscal 2011 are both 52-week years. Unless otherwise stated, references to years relate to fiscal years. In January 2011, the corporation announced that its board of directors has agreed in principle to divide the company into two separate, publicly traded companies which is expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of 2012. Under the current plan, the international coffee and tea business will be spun-off, tax-free, into a new public company (spin-off). The other company will primarily consist of Sara Lee's current North American retail, foodservice and specialty meats businesses. The separation plan is subject to final approval by the board of directors, other customary approvals and the receipt of an IRS tax ruling. In conjunction with this planned separation, the board of directors intends to declare a $3.00 per share dividend on the corporation's common stock. This special dividend is expected to be declared and paid in the fourth quarter of 2012. |
Contingencies And Commitments (Details)
In Millions, unless otherwise specified |
6 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 12 Months Ended | 0 Months Ended | 1 Months Ended | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec. 31, 2011
USD ($)
|
Jul. 02, 2011
USD ($)
|
Jul. 03, 2010
USD ($)
|
Jul. 01, 2006
USD ($)
|
Oct. 01, 2011
USD ($)
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Discontinued North American Fresh Bakery Operations [Member]
USD ($)
|
Jul. 03, 2010
Discontinued North American Fresh Bakery Operations [Member]
USD ($)
|
Dec. 31, 2011
Discontinued Operations [Member]
USD ($)
|
Jul. 02, 2011
Discontinued Operations [Member]
USD ($)
|
Jul. 03, 2010
Discontinued Operations [Member]
USD ($)
|
May 11, 2011
Nestec/Nespresso [Member]
|
Jun. 30, 2010
Nestec/Nespresso [Member]
EUR (€)
|
|
Purchase Commitment, Excluding Long-term Commitment [Line Items] | ||||||||||||
Number of patents | 2 | |||||||||||
Arbitrator award for damages and fees | $ 80 | |||||||||||
Regularly scheduled contributions to multi-employer pension plans | 3 | 4 | 45 | 43 | ||||||||
Withdrawal liabilities from multi-employer pension plans | 3 | (3) | 23 | |||||||||
Tax refund related to spin-off | 15 | |||||||||||
Hanesbrands, Inc. binding arbitration claim related to tax sharing agreement | 72 | |||||||||||
Lawsuit damages | € 50 |