10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x Quarterly Report Pursuant To Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2011

OR

¨ Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number	Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter and principal office address and telephone number	State of Incorporation	I.R.S. Employer ID. Number
1-14514	Consolidated Edison, Inc.	New York	13-3965100
	4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003
	(212) 460-4600
1-1217	Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.	New York	13-5009340
	4 Irving Place, New York, New York 10003
	(212) 460-4600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison)	Yes x	No ¨
Consolidated Edison of New York, Inc. (CECONY)	Yes x	No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Con Edison	Yes x	No ¨
CECONY	Yes x	No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Con Edison
Large accelerated filer x	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer ¨	Smaller reporting company ¨
CECONY
Large accelerated filer ¨	Accelerated filer ¨	Non-accelerated filer x	Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Con Edison	Yes ¨	No x
CECONY	Yes ¨	No x

As of July 29, 2011, Con Edison had outstanding 292,875,896 Common Shares ($.10 par value). All of the outstanding common equity of CECONY is held by Con Edison.

Filing Format

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q is a combined report being filed separately by two different registrants: Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY). CECONY is a subsidiary of Con Edison and, as such, the information in this report about CECONY also applies to Con Edison. As used in this report, the term the “Companies” refers to Con Edison and CECONY. However, CECONY makes no representation as to the information contained in this report relating to Con Edison or the subsidiaries of Con Edison other than itself.

Glossary of Terms

The following is a glossary of frequently used abbreviations or acronyms that are used in the Companies’ SEC reports:

Con Edison Companies
Con Edison	Consolidated Edison, Inc.
CECONY	Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.
Con Edison Development	Consolidated Edison Development, Inc.
Con Edison Energy	Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc.
Con Edison Solutions	Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc.
O&R	Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc.
Pike	Pike County Light & Power Company
RECO	Rockland Electric Company
The Companies	Con Edison and CECONY
The Utilities	CECONY and O&R
Regulatory Agencies, Government Agencies, and Quasi-governmental Not-for-Profits
EPA	U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
FERC	Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
IRS	Internal Revenue Service
ISO-NE	ISO New England Inc.
NJBPU	New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
NJDEP	New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection
NYAG	New York State Attorney General
NYISO	New York Independent System Operator
NYPA	New York Power Authority
NYSDEC	New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
NYSERDA	New York State Energy Research and Development Authority
NYSPSC	New York State Public Service Commission
NYSRC	New York State Reliability Council, LLC
PAPUC	Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
PJM	PJM Interconnection LLC
SEC	U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Accounting
ABO	Accumulated Benefit Obligation
ASU	Accounting Standards Update
FASB	Financial Accounting Standards Board
LILO	Lease In/Lease Out
OCI	Other Comprehensive Income
SFAS	Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
SSCM	Simplified service cost method
VIE	Variable interest entity
Environmental
CO2	Carbon dioxide
GHG	Greenhouse gases
MGP Sites	Manufactured gas plant sites
PCBs	Polychlorinated biphenyls
PRP	Potentially responsible party
SO2	Sulfur dioxide
Superfund	Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 and similar state statutes

2

Units of Measure
dths	Dekatherms
kV	Kilovolts
kWh	Kilowatt-hour
mdths	Thousand dekatherms
MMlbs	Million pounds
MVA	Megavolt amperes
MW	Megawatts or thousand kilowatts
MWH	Megawatt hour
Other
AFDC	Allowance for funds used during construction
COSO	Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
EMF	Electric and magnetic fields
ERRP	East River Repowering Project
Fitch	Fitch Ratings
First Quarter Form 10-Q	The Companies’ combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011
Form 10-K	The Companies’ combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010
LTIP	Long Term Incentive Plan
Moody’s	Moody’s Investors Service
S&P	Standard & Poor’s Rating Services
Second Quarter Form 10-Q	The Companies’ combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011
VaR	Value-at-Risk

3

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		PAGE
PART I—Financial Information
ITEM 1	Financial Statements (Unaudited)
	Con Edison
	Consolidated Income Statement		6
	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows		7
	Consolidated Balance Sheet		8
	Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income		10
	Consolidated Statement of Common Shareholders’ Equity		11
	CECONY
	Consolidated Income Statement		12
	Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows		13
	Consolidated Balance Sheet		14
	Consolidated Statement of Common Shareholder’s Equity		16
	Notes to Financial Statements (Unaudited)		17
ITEM  2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations		36
ITEM  3	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk		58
ITEM  4	Controls and Procedures		58
PART II—Other Information
ITEM  1	Legal Proceedings		59
ITEM 1A	Risk Factors		59
ITEM  2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds		59
ITEM  6	Exhibits		60
	Signatures		61

4

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report includes forward-looking statements intended to qualify for the safe-harbor provisions of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Forward-looking statements are statements of future expectation and not facts. Words such as “expects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “intends,” “believes,” “plans,” “will” and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time the statements are made, and accordingly speak only as of that time. Actual results or developments might differ materially from those included in the forward-looking statements because of various factors such as those discussed under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the Form 10-K.

5

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT (UNAUDITED)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars/Except Share Data)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric	$	2,153		$	2,256		$	4,022		$	4,145
Gas		333			274			1,088			1,047
Steam		107			89			432			396
Non-utility		400			398			800			890
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES		2,993			3,017			6,342			6,478
OPERATING EXPENSES
Purchased power		1,020			1,140			1,886			2,283
Fuel		68			87			244			237
Gas purchased for resale		111			67			418			410
Other operations and maintenance		732			678			1,429			1,379
Depreciation and amortization		219			211			437			415
Taxes, other than income taxes		445			405			904			833
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		2,595			2,588			5,318			5,557
OPERATING INCOME		398			429			1,024			921
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
Investment and other income		10			14			19			21
Allowance for equity funds used during construction		2			4			6			9
Other deductions		(7	)		(6	)		(10	)		(9	)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)		5			12			15			21
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST AND INCOME TAX EXPENSE		403			441			1,039			942
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on long-term debt		146			148			293			298
Other interest		7			4			14			6
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction		(1	)		(3	)		(3	)		(5	)
NET INTEREST EXPENSE		152			149			304			299
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE		251			292			735			643
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		83			106			252			228
NET INCOME		168			186			483			415
Preferred stock dividend requirements of subsidiary		(3	)		(3	)		(6	)		(6	)
NET INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK	$	165		$	183		$	477		$	409
Net income for common stock per common share – basic	$	0.57		$	0.65		$	1.63		$	1.45
Net income for common stock per common share – diluted	$	0.56		$	0.64		$	1.62		$	1.44
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK	$	0.600		$	0.595		$	1.200		$	1.190
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING – BASIC (IN MILLIONS)		292.7			282.0			292.3			281.7
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING – DILUTED (IN MILLIONS)		294.3			283.5			293.9			283.2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

6

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income	$	483		$	415
PRINCIPAL NON-CASH CHARGES/(CREDITS) TO INCOME
Depreciation and amortization		437			415
Deferred income taxes		181			46
Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction		(6	)		(9	)
Net derivative (gains)/losses		(35	)		(2	)
Other non-cash items (net)		(9	)		41
CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Accounts receivable – customers, less allowance for uncollectibles		72			(28	)
Materials and supplies, including fuel oil and gas in storage		38			27
Other receivables and other current assets		69			79
Prepayments		194			—
Accounts payable		(76	)		(79	)
Pensions and retiree benefits		(72	)		49
Accrued taxes		66			(7	)
Accrued interest		—			(3	)
Deferred charges, deferred derivative losses, noncurrent assets and other regulatory assets		125			(319	)
Deferred credits and other regulatory liabilities		140			111
Other assets		—			(7	)
Other liabilities		(18	)		66
NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES		1,589			795
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Utility construction expenditures		(958	)		(946	)
Cost of removal less salvage		(81	)		(66	)
Non-utility construction expenditures		(50	)		(4	)
Proceeds from investment tax credits and grants related to renewable energy investments		4			—
Loan to Pilesgrove solar project		(50	)		—
Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction		6			9
NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(1,129	)		(1,007	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from short-term debt		—			153
Retirement of long-term debt		(3	)		(426	)
Issuance of long-term debt		—			700
Issuance of common stock		58			25
Repurchase of common stock		(9	)		—
Debt issuance costs		—			(5	)
Common stock dividends		(346	)		(311	)
Preferred stock dividends		(6	)		(6	)
NET CASH FLOWS (USED IN)/FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(306	)		130
CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS:
NET CHANGE FOR THE PERIOD		154			(82	)
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		338			260
BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD	$	492		$	178
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid/(refunded) during the period for:
Interest	$	282		$	295
Income taxes	$	(155	)	$	157

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

7

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and temporary cash investments	$	492	$	338
Accounts receivable – customers, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $84 and $76 in 2011 and 2010, respectively		1,101		1,173
Accrued unbilled revenue		515		633
Other receivables, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $9 and $8 in 2011 and 2010, respectively		254		261
Loan receivable from Pilesgrove solar project		84		32
Fuel oil, gas in storage, materials and supplies, at average cost		310		348
Prepayments		147		341
Regulatory assets		130		203
Other current assets		176		178
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		3,209		3,507
INVESTMENTS		426		403
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
Electric		20,506		19,851
Gas		4,506		4,344
Steam		1,946		2,038
General		1,917		1,911
TOTAL		28,875		28,144
Less: Accumulated depreciation		5,870		5,808
Net		23,005		22,336
Construction work in progress		1,299		1,458
NET UTILITY PLANT		24,304		23,794
NON-UTILITY PLANT
Non-utility property, less accumulated depreciation of $55 and $51 in 2011 and 2010, respectively		56		46
Construction work in progress		54		23
NET PLANT		24,414		23,863
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
Goodwill		429		429
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $3 in 2011 and 2010		3		3
Regulatory assets		7,261		7,683
Other deferred charges and noncurrent assets		277		298
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS		7,970		8,413
TOTAL ASSETS	$	36,019	$	36,186

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

8

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Long-term debt due within one year	$	5	$	5
Accounts payable		1,033		1,151
Customer deposits		299		289
Accrued taxes		156		90
Accrued interest		155		155
Accrued wages		94		102
Fair value of derivative liabilities		109		125
Other current liabilities		622		703
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		2,473		2,620
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Obligations under capital leases		4		7
Provision for injuries and damages		182		165
Pensions and retiree benefits		2,666		3,287
Superfund and other environmental costs		502		512
Asset retirement obligations		112		109
Fair value of derivative liabilities		35		77
Other noncurrent liabilities		124		126
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES		3,625		4,283
DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		6,853		6,602
Regulatory liabilities		866		690
Other deferred credits		69		46
TOTAL DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES		7,788		7,338
LONG-TERM DEBT		10,669		10,671
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Common shareholders’ equity (See Statement of Shareholders’ Equity)		11,251		11,061
Preferred stock of subsidiary		213		213
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY		11,464		11,274
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY	$	36,019	$	36,186

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

9

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
NET INCOME	$	168		$	186		$	483		$	415
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS), NET OF TAXES
Pension plan liability adjustments, net of taxes of $1 and $3 in 2011 and $1 and $3 in 2010, respectively		2			1			5			4
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS), NET OF TAXES		2			1			5			4
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	$	170		$	187		$	488		$	419
Preferred stock dividend requirements of subsidiary		(3	)		(3	)		(6	)		(6	)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK	$	167		$	184		$	482		$	413

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

10

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMMON SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Treasury Stock						Capital Stock Expense			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)			Total
(Millions of Dollars/Except Share Data)	Shares		Amount							Shares			Amount
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009		281,123,741	$	30	$	4,420	$	6,904			23,210,700		$	(1,001	)	$	(62	)	$	(42	)	$	10,249
Net income for common stock								226															226
Common stock dividends								(167	)														(167	)
Issuance of common shares – dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans		647,731				28																	28
Other comprehensive income																				3			3
BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2010		281,771,472	$	30	$	4,448	$	6,963			23,210,700		$	(1,001	)	$	(62	)	$	(39	)	$	10,339
Net income for common stock								183															183
Common stock dividends								(168	)														(168	)
Issuance of common shares – dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans		555,964				25																	25
Other comprehensive income																				1			1
BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 2010		282,327,436	$	30	$	4,473	$	6,978			23,210,700		$	(1,001	)	$	(62	)	$	(38	)	$	10,380
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010		291,616,334	$	31	$	4,915	$	7,220			23,210,700		$	(1,001	)	$	(64	)	$	(40	)	$	11,061
Net income for common stock								311															311
Common stock dividends								(175	)														(175	)
Issuance of common shares – dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans		656,049		1		30																	31
Other comprehensive income																				3			3
BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2011		292,272,383	$	32	$	4,945	$	7,356			23,210,700		$	(1,001	)	$	(64	)	$	(37	)	$	11,231
Net income for common stock								165															165
Common stock dividends								(175	)														(175	)
Issuance of common shares – dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans		603,513				32					(182,942	)		5									37
Common stock repurchases											178,942			(9	)								(9	)
Other comprehensive income																				2			2
BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 2011		292,875,896	$	32	$	4,977	$	7,346			23,206,700		$	(1,005	)	$	(64	)	$	(35	)	$	11,251

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

11

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT (UNAUDITED)

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,						For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010			2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric	$	2,013		$	2,104		$	3,734		$	3,832
Gas		296			239			959			922
Steam		107			89			432			396
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES		2,416			2,432			5,125			5,150
OPERATING EXPENSES
Purchased power		621			787			1,104			1,339
Fuel		68			87			244			237
Gas purchased for resale		92			51			355			345
Other operations and maintenance		631			588			1,227			1,195
Depreciation and amortization		205			196			410			388
Taxes, other than income taxes		429			389			868			800
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES		2,046			2,098			4,208			4,304
OPERATING INCOME		370			334			917			846
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
Investment and other income		4			14			9			18
Allowance for equity funds used during construction		2			4			5			8
Other deductions		(6	)		(6	)		(9	)		(9	)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)		—			12			5			17
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST AND INCOME TAX EXPENSE		370			346			922			863
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on long-term debt		131			133			263			268
Other interest		5			5			10			8
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction		(1	)		(2	)		(3	)		(4	)
NET INTEREST EXPENSE		135			136			270			272
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE		235			210			652			591
INCOME TAX EXPENSE		75			72			220			207
NET INCOME		160			138			432			384
Preferred stock dividend requirements		(3	)		(3	)		(6	)		(6	)
NET INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK	$	157		$	135		$	426		$	378

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

12

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	2011			2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	432		$	384
PRINCIPAL NON-CASH CHARGES/(CREDITS) TO INCOME
Depreciation and amortization		410			388
Deferred income taxes		146			56
Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction		(5	)		(8	)
Other non-cash items (net)		66			16
CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Accounts receivable – customers, less allowance for uncollectibles		74			(21	)
Materials and supplies, including fuel oil and gas in storage		36			14
Other receivables and other current assets		207			58
Prepayments		9			2
Accounts payable		(56	)		(75	)
Pensions and retiree benefits		(109	)		22
Accrued taxes		21			2
Accrued interest		—			(4	)
Deferred charges, deferred derivative losses, noncurrent assets and other regulatory assets		65			(271	)
Deferred credits and other regulatory liabilities		138			97
Other liabilities		(9	)		77
NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES		1,425			737
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Utility construction expenditures		(910	)		(895	)
Cost of removal less salvage		(78	)		(65	)
Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction		5			8
NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES		(983	)		(952	)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from short-term debt		—			66
Issuance of long-term debt		—			700
Retirement of long-term debt		—			(325	)
Debt issuance costs		—			(5	)
Capital contribution by parent		—			24
Dividend to parent		(340	)		(335	)
Preferred stock dividends		(6	)		(6	)
NET CASH FLOWS (USED IN)/FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES		(346	)		119
CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS:
NET CHANGE FOR THE PERIOD		96			(96	)
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD		78			131
BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD	$	174		$	35
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash paid/(refunded) during the period for:
Interest	$	253		$	265
Income taxes	$	(128	)	$	137

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

13

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
ASSETS
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and temporary cash investments	$	174	$	78
Accounts receivable – customers, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $75 and $68 in 2011 and 2010, respectively		951		1,025
Other receivables, less allowance for uncollectible accounts of $8 and $7 in 2011 and 2010, respectively		88		73
Accrued unbilled revenue		388		473
Accounts receivable from affiliated companies		60		273
Fuel oil, gas in storage, materials and supplies, at average cost		270		306
Prepayments		73		82
Regulatory assets		98		151
Other current assets		91		104
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS		2,193		2,565
INVESTMENTS		190		167
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
Electric		19,311		18,735
Gas		3,999		3,844
Steam		1,946		2,038
General		1,747		1,746
TOTAL		27,003		26,363
Less: Accumulated depreciation		5,360		5,314
Net		21,643		21,049
Construction work in progress		1,232		1,345
NET UTILITY PLANT		22,875		22,394
NON-UTILITY PLANT
Non-utility property, less accumulated depreciation of $23 and $22 in 2011 and 2010, respectively		7		7
NET PLANT		22,882		22,401
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
Regulatory assets		6,727		7,097
Other deferred charges and noncurrent assets		234		244
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS		6,961		7,341
TOTAL ASSETS	$	32,226	$	32,474

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

14

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET (UNAUDITED)

	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	$	820	$	924
Accounts payable to affiliated companies		17		13
Customer deposits		285		276
Accrued taxes		59		34
Accrued taxes to affiliated companies		25		29
Accrued interest		130		130
Accrued wages		89		93
Other current liabilities		590		686
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES		2,015		2,185
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Obligations under capital leases		4		7
Provision for injuries and damages		175		159
Pensions and retiree benefits		2,283		2,900
Superfund and other environmental costs		384		392
Asset retirement obligations		112		109
Fair value of derivative liabilities		13		29
Other noncurrent liabilities		117		116
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES		3,088		3,712
DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		6,342		6,071
Regulatory liabilities		751		585
Other deferred credits		65		42
TOTAL DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES		7,158		6,698
LONG-TERM DEBT		9,744		9,743
SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY
Common shareholder’s equity (See Statement of Shareholder’s Equity)		10,008		9,923
Preferred stock		213		213
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY		10,221		10,136
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY	$	32,226	$	32,474

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

15

Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMMON SHAREHOLDER’S EQUITY (UNAUDITED)

	Common Stock				Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Repurchased Con Edison Stock			Capital Stock Expense			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)			Total
(Millions of Dollars/Except Share Data)	Shares		Amount
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2009		235,488,094	$	589	$	3,877	$	5,909		$	(962	)	$	(62	)	$	(4	)	$	9,347
Net income								246												246
Capital contribution from parent						12														12
Common stock dividend to parent								(167	)											(167	)
Cumulative preferred dividends								(3	)											(3	)
BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2010		235,488,094	$	589	$	3,889	$	5,985		$	(962	)	$	(62	)	$	(4	)	$	9,435
Net income								138												138
Capital contribution from parent						12														12
Common stock dividend to parent								(168	)											(168	)
Cumulative preferred dividends								(3	)											(3	)
BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 2010		235,488,094	$	589	$	3,901	$	5,952		$	(962	)	$	(62	)	$	(4	)	$	9,414
BALANCE AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2010		235,488,094	$	589	$	4,234	$	6,132		$	(962	)	$	(64	)	$	(6	)	$	9,923
Net income								271												271
Common stock dividend to parent								(170	)											(170	)
Cumulative preferred dividends								(3	)											(3	)
BALANCE AS OF MARCH 31, 2011		235,488,094	$	589	$	4,234	$	6,230		$	(962	)	$	(64	)	$	(6	)	$	10,021
Net income								160												160
Common stock dividend to parent								(170	)											(170	)
Cumulative preferred dividends								(3	)											(3	)
BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30, 2011		235,488,094	$	589	$	4,234	$	6,217		$	(962	)	$	(64	)	$	(6	)	$	10,008

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

16

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

General

These combined notes accompany and form an integral part of the separate consolidated financial statements of each of the two separate registrants: Consolidated Edison, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Con Edison) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and its subsidiaries (CECONY). CECONY is a subsidiary of Con Edison and as such its financial condition and results of operations and cash flows, which are presented separately in the CECONY consolidated financial statements, are also consolidated, along with those of Con Edison’s other utility subsidiary, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R), and Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses (discussed below) in Con Edison’s consolidated financial statements. The term “Utilities” is used in these notes to refer to CECONY and O&R.

As used in these notes, the term “Companies” refers to Con Edison and CECONY and, except as otherwise noted, the information in these combined notes relates to each of the Companies. However, CECONY makes no representation as to information relating to Con Edison or the subsidiaries of Con Edison other than itself.

The separate interim consolidated financial statements of each of the Companies are unaudited but, in the opinion of their respective managements, reflect all adjustments (which include only normally recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The Companies’ separate interim consolidated financial statements should be read together with their separate audited financial statements (including the combined notes thereto) included in Item 8 of their combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) and their separate unaudited financial statements (including the combined notes thereto) included in Part I, Item 1 of their combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the First Quarter Form 10-Q). Information in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K and the First Quarter Form 10-Q referred to in these notes is incorporated by reference herein. The use of terms such as “see” or “refer to” shall be deemed to incorporate by reference into these notes the information to which reference is made. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Con Edison has two regulated utility subsidiaries: CECONY and O&R. CECONY provides electric service and gas service in New York City and Westchester County. The company also provides steam service in parts of Manhattan. O&R, along with its regulated utility subsidiaries, provides electric service in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of northern New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania and gas service in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of eastern Pennsylvania. Con Edison has the following competitive energy businesses: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc. (Con Edison Solutions), a retail energy services company that sells electricity and also offers energy-related services; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc. (Con Edison Energy), a wholesale energy supply and services company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc. (Con Edison Development), a company that develops and participates in infrastructure projects.

17

Note A — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Earnings Per Common Share

Reference is made to “Earnings Per Common Share” in Note A to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Con Edison’s basic and diluted EPS for Con Edison are calculated as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Millions of Dollars, except per share amounts/Shares in Millions)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income for common stock	$	165	$	183	$	477	$	409
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic		292.7		282.0		292.3		281.7
Add: Incremental shares attributable to effect of potentially dilutive securities		1.6		1.5		1.6		1.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted		294.3		283.5		293.9		283.2
Net income for common stock per common share – basic	$	0.57	$	0.65	$	1.63	$	1.45
Net income for common stock per common share – diluted	$	0.56	$	0.64	$	1.62	$	1.44

Note B — Regulatory Matters

Reference is made to “Accounting Policies” in Note A and “Rate Agreements” in Note B to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note B to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

Rate Agreements

O&R — Electric

In June 2011, the NYSPSC adopted an order granting O&R an electric rate increase, effective July 1, 2011, of $26.6 million. The NYSPSC ruling reflects the following major items:

• a weighted average cost of capital of 7.22 percent, reflecting:

• a return on common equity of 9.2 percent, assuming achievement by the company of $825,000 of austerity measures;

• cost of long-term debt of 5.50 percent; and

• common equity ratio of 48 percent.

• continuation of a revenue decoupling mechanism;

• a provision for reconciliation of certain differences in actual average net utility plant to the amount reflected in rates ($718 million) and continuation of rate provisions under which pension and other post-retirement benefit expenses, environmental remediation expenses, tax-exempt debt costs and certain other expenses are reconciled to amounts for those expenses reflected in rates;

• continuation of the rate provisions pursuant to which the company recovers its purchased power costs from customers;

• discontinuation of the provisions under which property taxes were reconciled to amounts reflected in rates;

• discontinuation of the inclusion in rates of funding for the company’s annual incentive plan for non-officer management employees;

• continuation of provisions for potential operations penalties of up to $3 million annually if certain customer service and system reliability performance targets are not met; and

• O&R is directed to produce a report detailing its implementation plans for the recommendations made in connection with the NYSPSC’s management audit of CECONY, with a forecast of costs to achieve and expected savings. (See “Rate Agreements – Other Regulatory Matters” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.)

On July 29, 2011, O&R filed a request with the NYSPSC for an increase in the rates it charges for electric service rendered in New York, effective July 1, 2012, of $17.7 million. The filing reflects a return on common equity of 10.75 percent and a common equity ratio of 49.4 percent. Among other things, the filing proposes continuation of the current provisions with respect to recovery from customers of the cost of purchased power and with respect to the deferral of

18

differences between actual expenses allocable to the electric business for pensions and other postretirement benefits, environmental, and research and developmental costs to the amounts for such costs reflected in electric rates. The filing also includes an alternative proposal for a three-year electric rate plan with annual rate increases of $17.6 million effective July 2012, 2013 and 2014. The multi-year filing reflects a return on common equity of 11.25 percent.

Other Regulatory Matters

In February 2009, the NYSPSC commenced a proceeding to examine the prudence of certain CECONY expenditures (see “Investigations of Vendor Payments” in Note G). Pursuant to NYSPSC orders, a portion of the company’s revenues (currently, $249 million, $32 million and $6 million on an annual basis for electric, gas and steam service, respectively) is being collected subject to potential refund to customers. At June 30, 2011, the company had collected an estimated $681 million from customers subject to potential refund in connection with this proceeding. In October 2010, a NYSPSC consultant reported its $21 million provisional assessment, which the company has disputed, of potential overcharges for construction work. The potential overcharges related to transactions that involved certain employees who were arrested and a contractor that performed work for the company. The NYSPSC’s consultant is expected to continue to review the company’s expenditures. At June 30, 2011, the company had a $10.5 million regulatory liability relating to this matter. The company is unable to estimate the amount, if any, by which any refund required by the NYSPSC may exceed this regulatory liability.

In February 2011, the NYSPSC initiated a proceeding to examine the existing mechanisms pursuant to which utilities recover site investigation and remediation costs and possible alternatives. See Note G to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note F to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

19

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

Regulatory assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were comprised of the following items:

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Regulatory assets
Unrecognized pension and other postretirement costs	$	3,921	$	4,371	$	3,728	$	4,152
Future federal income tax		1,730		1,593		1,659		1,515
Environmental remediation costs		684		695		566		574
Pension and other post retirement benefits deferrals		183		138		140		90
Revenue taxes		155		145		150		140
Net electric deferrals		130		156		129		156
Surcharge for New York State Assessment		98		121		91		112
Deferred storm costs		53		57		41		43
O&R transition bond charges		47		48		—		—
Deferred derivative losses – long-term		44		74		28		48
Property tax reconciliation		31		34		19		27
Workers’ compensation		28		31		28		31
World Trade Center restoration costs		13		45		13		45
Recoverable energy		—		42		—		42
Other		144		133		135		122
Regulatory assets – long-term		7,261		7,683		6,727		7,097
Deferred derivative losses – current		121		190		98		151
Recoverable energy costs – current		9		13		—		—
Regulatory assets – current		130		203		98		151
Total Regulatory Assets	$	7,391	$	7,886	$	6,825	$	7,248
Regulatory liabilities
Allowance for cost of removal less salvage	$	430	$	422	$	356	$	350
Revenue decoupling mechanism		81		38		81		38
World Trade Center settlement proceeds		62		—		62		—
Carrying charges on T&D net plant		40		28		11		5
Energy efficiency programs		28		19		27		18
New York State tax refund		20		30		20		30
Gain on sale of properties		15		31		15		31
Bonus depreciation		13		1		12		1
Expenditure prudence proceeding		11		—		11		—
Other		166		121		156		112
Regulatory liabilities		866		690		751		585
Net unbilled revenue deferrals – current		117		136		117		136
Refundable energy cost – current		75		117		50		90
Deferred derivative gains – current		6		4		4		3
Regulatory liabilities – current		198		257		171		229
Total Regulatory Liabilities	$	1,064	$	947	$	922	$	814

Note C — Short-Term Borrowing

Reference is made to Note D to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note C to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 Con Edison and CECONY had no commercial paper outstanding.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no loans were outstanding under the Companies’ Credit Agreement and $188 million (including $135 million for CECONY) and $197 million (including $145 million for CECONY) of letters of credit were outstanding under the Credit Agreement, respectively.

Note D — Pension Benefits

Reference is made to Note E to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note D to the financial statement in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

20

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the Companies’ net periodic benefit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost – including administrative expenses	$	47		$	42		$	44		$	39
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		140			139			131			130
Expected return on plan assets		(183	)		(176	)		(175	)		(167	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		132			106			125			100
Amortization of prior service costs		2			2			2			2
NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	138		$	113		$	127		$	104
Amortization of regulatory asset		1			1			1			1
TOTAL PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	139		$	114		$	128		$	105
Cost capitalized		(48	)		(37	)		(45	)		(34	)
Cost deferred		(6	)		(33	)		(7	)		(32	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	85		$	44		$	76		$	39

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost – including administrative expenses	$	94		$	84		$	88		$	78
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		280			278			262			260
Expected return on plan assets		(366	)		(352	)		(350	)		(334	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		264			212			250			200
Amortization of prior service costs		4			4			4			4
NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	276		$	226		$	254		$	208
Amortization of regulatory asset		1			1			1			1
TOTAL PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	277		$	227		$	255		$	209
Cost capitalized		(96	)		(78	)		(89	)		(73	)
Cost deferred		(57	)		(56	)		(59	)		(53	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	124		$	93		$	107		$	83

Expected Contributions

Based on estimates as of March 31, 2011, the Companies are not required under funding regulations and laws to make any contributions to the pension plan during 2011. The Companies’ policy is to fund their accounting cost to the extent tax deductible. In 2011, Con Edison expects to make discretionary contributions to the pension plan of $533 million, of which CECONY contributed $491 million during the first six months of 2011. During the first six months of 2010, CECONY contributed $279 million to the pension plan. During the first six months of 2011, the Companies funded $11 million for the non-qualified supplemental pension plans.

Note E — Other Postretirement Benefits

Reference is made to Note F to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note E to the financial statement in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

21

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the Companies’ net periodic postretirement benefit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	6		$	6		$	5		$	5
Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation		21			23			18			20
Expected return on plan assets		(22	)		(22	)		(19	)		(19	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		22			23			20			21
Amortization of prior service cost		(2	)		(3	)		(3	)		(4	)
Amortization of transition obligation		1			1			1			1
NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST	$	26		$	28		$	22		$	24
Cost capitalized		(9	)		(10	)		(8	)		(8	)
Cost deferred		4			1			4			—
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	21		$	19		$	18		$	16

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	12		$	12		$	10		$	10
Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation		42			46			36			40
Expected return on plan assets		(44	)		(44	)		(38	)		(38	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		44			46			40			42
Amortization of prior service cost		(4	)		(6	)		(6	)		(8	)
Amortization of transition obligation		2			2			2			2
NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST	$	52		$	56		$	44		$	48
Cost capitalized		(18	)		(20	)		(15	)		(17	)
Cost deferred		9			—			7			(2	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	43		$	36		$	36		$	29

Expected Contributions

Based on estimates as of March 31, 2011, Con Edison expects to make a contribution of $84 million, including $74 million for CECONY, to the other postretirement benefit plans in 2011.

Note F — Environmental Matters

Superfund Sites

Hazardous substances, such as asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and coal tar, have been used or generated in the course of operations of the Utilities and their predecessors and are present at sites and in facilities and equipment they currently or previously owned, including sites at which gas was manufactured or stored.

The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 and similar state statutes (Superfund) impose joint and several liability, regardless of fault, upon generators of hazardous substances for investigation and remediation costs (which include costs of demolition, removal, disposal, storage, replacement, containment, and monitoring) and natural resource damages. Liability under these laws can be material and may be imposed for contamination from past acts, even though such past acts may have been lawful at the time they occurred. The sites at which the Utilities have been asserted to have liability under these laws, including their manufactured gas plant sites and any neighboring areas to which contamination may have migrated, are referred to herein as “Superfund Sites.”

For Superfund Sites where there are other potentially responsible parties and the Utilities are not managing the site investigation and remediation, the accrued liability represents an estimate of the amount the Utilities will need to pay to investigate and, where determinable, discharge their related obligations. For Superfund Sites (including the manufactured gas plant sites) for which one of the Utilities is managing the investigation and remediation, the accrued liability represents an estimate of the company’s share of undiscounted cost to investigate the sites and, for sites

22

that have been investigated in whole or in part, the cost to remediate the sites, if remediation is necessary and if a reasonable estimate of such cost can be made. Remediation costs are estimated in light of the information available, applicable remediation standards, and experience with similar sites.

The accrued liabilities and regulatory assets related to Superfund Sites at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Accrued Liabilities:
Manufactured gas plant sites	$	434	$	446	$	317	$	327
Other Superfund Sites		68		66		67		65
Total	$	502	$	512	$	384	$	392
Regulatory assets	$	683	$	692	$	564	$	571

Most of the accrued Superfund Site liability relates to sites that have been investigated, in whole or in part. However, for some of the sites, the extent and associated cost of the required remediation has not yet been determined. As investigations progress and information pertaining to the required remediation becomes available, the Utilities expect that additional liability may be accrued, the amount of which is not presently determinable, but may be material. Under their current rate agreements, the Utilities are permitted to recover or defer as regulatory assets (for subsequent recovery through rates) certain site investigation and remediation costs. In February 2011, the NYSPSC initiated a proceeding to examine the existing mechanisms pursuant to which utilities recover such costs and possible alternatives.

Environmental remediation costs incurred related to Superfund Sites for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Remediation costs incurred	$	10	$	14	$	8	$	13

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Remediation costs incurred	$	16	$	23	$	14	$	21

Insurance recoveries related to Superfund Sites for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were immaterial.

In 2010, CECONY estimated that for its manufactured gas plant sites, its aggregate undiscounted potential liability for the investigation and remediation of coal tar and/or other manufactured gas plant-related environmental contaminants could range up to $1.9 billion. In 2010, O&R estimated that for its manufactured gas plant sites, each of which has been investigated, the aggregate undiscounted potential liability for the remediation of such contaminants could range up to $200 million. These estimates were based on the assumption that there is contamination at all sites, including those that have not yet been fully investigated and additional assumptions about the extent of the contamination and the type and extent of the remediation that may be required. Actual experience may be materially different.

Asbestos Proceedings

Suits have been brought in New York State and federal courts against the Utilities and many other defendants, wherein a large number of plaintiffs sought large amounts of compensatory and punitive damages for deaths and injuries allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos at various premises of the Utilities. The suits that have been resolved, which are many, have been resolved without any payment by the Utilities, or for amounts that were not, in the aggregate, material to them. The amounts specified in all the remaining thousands of suits total billions of dollars; however, the Utilities believe that these amounts are greatly exaggerated, based on the disposition of previous

23

claims. In 2010, CECONY estimated that its aggregate undiscounted potential liability for these suits and additional suits that may be brought over the next 15 years is $10 million. The estimate was based upon a combination of modeling, historical data analysis and risk factor assessment. Actual experience may be materially different. In addition, certain current and former employees have claimed or are claiming workers’ compensation benefits based on alleged disability from exposure to asbestos. Under its current rate agreements, CECONY is permitted to defer as regulatory assets (for subsequent recovery through rates) costs incurred for its asbestos lawsuits and workers’ compensation claims. The accrued liability for asbestos suits and workers’ compensation proceedings (including those related to asbestos exposure) and the amounts deferred as regulatory assets for the Companies at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Accrued liability – asbestos suits	$	10	$	10	$	10	$	10
Regulatory assets – asbestos suits	$	10	$	10	$	10	$	10
Accrued liability – workers’ compensation	$	103	$	106	$	98	$	101
Regulatory assets – workers’ compensation	$	28	$	31	$	28	$	31

Note G — Other Material Contingencies

Manhattan Steam Main Rupture

In July 2007, a CECONY steam main located in midtown Manhattan ruptured. It has been reported that one person died and others were injured as a result of the incident. Several buildings in the area were damaged. Debris from the incident included dirt and mud containing asbestos. The response to the incident required the closing of several buildings and streets for various periods. Approximately 100 suits are pending against the company seeking generally unspecified compensatory and, in some cases, punitive damages, for personal injury, property damage and business interruption. The company has not accrued a liability for the suits. The company has notified its insurers of the incident and believes that the policies in force at the time of the incident will cover most of the company’s costs, which the company is unable to estimate, but which could be substantial, to satisfy its liability to others in connection with the incident.

Investigations of Vendor Payments

In January 2009, CECONY commenced an internal investigation relating to the arrests of certain employees

and retired employees (all of whom have since pleaded guilty) for accepting kickbacks from contractors that performed construction work for the company. The company has retained a law firm, which has retained an accounting firm, to assist in the company’s investigation. The company is providing information to governmental authorities, which consider the company to be a victim of unlawful conduct, in connection with their investigation of the arrested employees and contractors. The company has terminated its employment of the arrested employees and its contracts with the contractors. In February 2009, the NYSPSC commenced a proceeding that, among other things, will examine the prudence of certain of the company’s expenditures relating to the arrests and consider whether additional expenditures should also be examined (see “Other Regulatory Matters” in Note B).

CECONY is also investigating the September 2010 arrest of a retired employee (who has since pleaded guilty to participating in a bribery scheme in which the employee received payments from two companies that supplied materials to the company) and the January 2011 arrest of an employee (for accepting kickbacks from an engineering firm that performed work for the company). CECONY has provided information to governmental authorities in connection with their ongoing investigations of these matters.

The company, based upon its evaluation of its internal controls for 2010 and previous years, believes that the controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that its financial statements have been fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Because the company’s investigations are ongoing, the company is unable to predict the impact of any of the employees’ unlawful

24

conduct on the company’s internal controls, business, results of operations or financial position.

Lease In/Lease Out Transactions

In each of 1997 and 1999, Con Edison Development entered into a transaction in which it leased property and then immediately subleased it back to the lessor (termed “Lease In/Lease Out,” or LILO transactions). The transactions respectively involve electric generating and gas distribution facilities in the Netherlands, with a total investment of $259 million. The transactions were financed with $93 million of equity and $166 million of non-recourse, long-term debt secured by the underlying assets. In accordance with the accounting rules for leases, Con Edison is accounting for the two LILO transactions as leveraged leases. Accordingly, the company’s investment in these leases, net of non-recourse debt, is carried as a single amount in Con Edison’s consolidated balance sheet and income is recognized pursuant to a method that incorporates a level rate of return for those years when net investment in the lease is positive, based upon the after-tax cash flows projected at the inception of the leveraged leases. The company’s investment in these leveraged leases was $(48) million at June 30, 2011 and $(41) million at December 31, 2010 and is comprised of a $234 million gross investment less $282 million deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2011 and $235 million gross investment less $276 million of deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2010.

On audit of Con Edison’s tax return for 1997, the IRS disallowed the tax losses in connection with the 1997 LILO transaction. In December 2005, Con Edison paid a $0.3 million income tax deficiency asserted by the IRS for the tax year 1997 with respect to the 1997 LILO transaction. In April 2006, the company paid interest of $0.2 million associated with the deficiency and commenced an action in the United States Court of Federal Claims, entitled Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. United States, to obtain a refund of this tax payment and interest. A trial was completed in November 2007. In October 2009, the court issued a decision in favor of the company concluding that the 1997 LILO transaction was, in substance, a true lease that possessed economic substance, the loans relating to the lease constituted bona fide indebtedness, and the deductions for the 1997 LILO transactions claimed by the company in its 1997 federal income tax return are allowable. The IRS is entitled to appeal the decision.

In connection with its audit of Con Edison’s federal income tax returns for 1998 through 2007, the IRS disallowed $416 million of net tax deductions taken with respect to both of the LILO transactions for the tax years. Con Edison is pursuing administrative appeals of these audit level disallowances. In connection with its audit of Con Edison’s federal income tax returns for 2009 and 2008, the IRS has disallowed $41 million and $42 million, respectively, of net tax deductions taken with respect to both of the LILO transactions. When these audit level disallowances become appealable, Con Edison intends to file an appeal of the disallowances.

Con Edison believes that its LILO transactions have been correctly reported, and has not recorded any reserve with respect to the disallowance of tax losses, or related interest, in connection with its LILO transactions. Con Edison’s estimated tax savings, reflected in its financial statements, from the two LILO transactions through June 30, 2011, in the aggregate, was $229 million. If Con Edison were required to repay all or a portion of these amounts, it would also be required to pay interest of up to $82 million net of tax at June 30, 2011.

Pursuant to the accounting rules for leveraged lease transactions, the expected timing of income tax cash flows generated by Con Edison’s LILO transactions are required to be reviewed at least annually. If the expected timing of the cash flows is revised, the rate of return and the allocation of income would be recalculated from the inception of the LILO transactions, and the company would be required to recalculate the accounting effect of the LILO transactions, which would result in a charge to earnings that could have a material adverse effect on the company’s results of operations.

25

Guarantees

Con Edison and its subsidiaries enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance primarily to third parties on behalf of their subsidiaries. Maximum amounts guaranteed by Con Edison totaled $834 million and $859 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

A summary, by type (described in Note H to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K) and term, of Con Edison’s total guarantees at June 30, 2011 is as follows:

Guarantee Type	0 – 3 years		4 – 10 years		> 10 years		Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Commodity transactions	$	616		8		140	$	764
Intra-company guarantees		15		—		1		16
Other guarantees		40		14		—		54
TOTAL	$	671	$	22	$	141	$	834

Note H — Financial Information by Business Segment

Reference is made to Note N to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

The financial data for the business segments are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Operating revenues						Inter-segment revenues						Depreciation and amortization				Operating income
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
CECONY
Electric	$	2,013		$	2,104		$	3		$	2		$	162	$	156	$	350		$	319
Gas		296			239			1			1			27		25		31			44
Steam		107			89			20			18			16		15		(11	)		(29	)
Consolidation adjustments		—			—			(24	)		(21	)		—		—		—			—
Total CECONY	$	2,416		$	2,432		$	—		$	—		$	205	$	196	$	370		$	334
O&R
Electric	$	141		$	153		$	—		$	—		$	8	$	8	$	14		$	15
Gas		37			35			—			—			4		3		1			(1	)
Total O&R	$	178		$	188		$	—		$	—		$	12	$	11	$	15		$	14
Competitive energy businesses	$	406		$	406		$	2		$	2		$	2	$	4	$	14		$	81
Other*		(7	)		(9	)		(2	)		(2	)		—		—		(1	)		—
Total Con Edison	$	2,993		$	3,017		$	—		$	—		$	219	$	211	$	398		$	429

* Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Operating revenues						Inter-segment revenues						Depreciation and amortization				Operating income
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
CECONY
Electric	$	3,734		$	3,832		$	6		$	6		$	324	$	307	$	566		$	514
Gas		959			922			2			2			54		50		237			259
Steam		432			396			40			36			32		31		114			73
Consolidation adjustments		—			—			(48	)		(44	)		—		—		—			—
Total CECONY	$	5,125		$	5,150		$	—		$	—		$	410	$	388	$	917		$	846
O&R
Electric	$	289		$	314		$	—		$	—		$	17	$	16	$	25		$	22
Gas		130			125			—			—			7		6		28			21
Total O&R	$	419		$	439		$	—		$	—		$	24	$	22	$	53		$	43
Competitive energy businesses	$	814		$	906		$	5		$	4		$	3	$	5	$	58		$	33
Other*		(16	)		(17	)		(5	)		(4	)		—		—		(4	)		(1	)
Total Con Edison	$	6,342		$	6,478		$	—		$	—		$	437	$	415	$	1,024		$	921

* Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

26

Note I — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging, derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value, unless an exception is available under the accounting rules. Certain qualifying derivative contracts have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts. These contracts are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules.

Energy Price Hedging

Con Edison’s subsidiaries hedge market price fluctuations associated with physical purchases and sales of electricity, natural gas, and steam by using derivative instruments including futures, forwards, basis swaps, options, transmission congestion contracts and financial transmission rights contracts. The fair values of these hedges at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - gross	$	(121	)	$	(261	)	$	(75	)	$	(156	)
Impact of netting of cash collateral		100			176			56			104
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - net	$	(21	)	$	(85	)	$	(19	)	$	(52	)

Credit Exposure

The Companies are exposed to credit risk related to transactions entered into primarily for the various energy supply and hedging activities by the Utilities and the competitive energy businesses. The Companies use credit policies to manage this risk, including an established credit approval process, monitoring of counterparty limits, netting provisions within agreements, collateral or prepayment arrangements, credit insurance and credit default swaps.

At June 30, 2011, Con Edison and CECONY had $152 million and $31 million of credit exposure in connection with energy supply and hedging activities, net of collateral, respectively. Con Edison’s net credit exposure consisted of $58 million with investment-grade counterparties, $53 million with commodity exchange brokers, $39 million with independent system operators and $2 million with non-investment grade counterparties. CECONY’s net credit exposure consisted of $3 million with investment-grade counterparties and $28 million with commodity exchange brokers.

Economic Hedges

The Companies enter into certain derivative instruments that do not qualify or are not designated as hedges under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging. However, management believes these instruments represent economic hedges that mitigate exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices.

The fair values of the Companies’ commodity derivatives at June 30, 2011 were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a) Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative Assets
Current	Other current assets	$	134		$	38
Long-term	Other deferred charges and non-current assets		42			22
Total derivative assets		$	176		$	60
Impact of netting			(63	)		(14	)
Net derivative assets		$	113		$	46
Derivative Liabilities
Current	Fair value of derivative liabilities	$	234		$	—
Current	Other current liabilities		—			98
Long-term	Fair value of derivative liabilities		63			37
Total derivative liabilities		$	297		$	135
Impact of netting			(163	)		(70	)
Net derivative liabilities		$	134		$	65

27

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

The fair values of the Companies’ commodity derivatives at December 31, 2010 were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a) Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative Assets
Current	Other current assets	$	184		$	29
Long-term	Other deferred charges and non-current assets		51			19
Total derivative assets		$	235		$	48
Impact of netting			(129	)		—
Net derivative assets		$	106		$	48
Derivative Liabilities
Current	Fair value of derivative liabilities	$	385		$	—
Current	Other current liabilities		—			148
Long-term	Fair value of derivative liabilities		111			56
Total derivative liabilities		$	496		$	204
Impact of netting			(305	)		(104	)
Net derivative liabilities		$	191		$	100

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

The Utilities generally recover all of their prudently incurred fuel, purchased power and gas cost, including hedging gains and losses, in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable state utility commissions. See “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In accordance with the accounting rules for regulated operations, the Utilities record a regulatory asset or liability to defer recognition of unrealized gains and losses on their electric and gas derivatives. As gains and losses are realized in future periods, they will be recognized as purchased power, gas and fuel costs in the Companies’ consolidated income statements. Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses record realized and unrealized gains and losses on their derivative contracts in earnings in the reporting period in which they occur.

The following tables present the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011:

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the three months ended June 30, 2011
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Deferred derivative gains	$	(4	)	$	(4	)
Long-term	Regulatory liabilities		(1	)		—
Total deferred gains		$	(5	)	$	(4	)
Current	Deferred derivative losses	$	25		$	18
Current	Recoverable energy costs		(53	)		(39	)
Long-term	Regulatory assets		12			9
Total deferred losses		$	(16	)	$	(12	)
Net deferred losses		$	(21	)	$	(16	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	73	(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		17			—
	Non-utility revenue		7	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	97		$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

28

(b) For the three months ended June 30, 2011 Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(12) million and $10 million, respectively.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the six months ended June 30, 2011
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Deferred derivative gains	$	2		$	1
Long-term	Regulatory liabilities		2			2
Total deferred gains		$	4		$	3
Current	Deferred derivative losses	$	69		$	53
Current	Recoverable energy costs		(102	)		(81	)
Long-term	Regulatory assets		28			20
Total deferred losses		$	(5	)	$	(8	)
Net deferred losses		$	(1	)	$	(5	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	52	(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		11			—
	Non-utility revenue		17	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	80		$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the six months ended June 30, 2011, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(25) million and $60 million, respectively.

The following tables present the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Other current liabilities	$	1		$	1
Total deferred gains		$	1		$	1
Current	Other current assets	$	95		$	78
Current	Recoverable energy costs	$	(80	)	$	(67	)
Long term	Regulatory assets	$	51		$	38
Total deferred losses		$	66		$	49
Net deferred losses		$	67		$	50
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	(43	)(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		(11	)		—
	Non-utility revenue		2	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	(52	)	$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the three months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $(45) million and $110 million, respectively.

29

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Other current liabilities	$	(5	)	$	(5	)
Total deferred gains		$	(5	)	$	(5	)
Current	Other current assets	$	(66	)	$	(60	)
Current	Recoverable energy costs	$	(135	)	$	(109	)
Long term	Regulatory assets	$	(23	)	$	(18	)
Total deferred losses		$	(224	)	$	(187	)
Net deferred losses		$	(229	)	$	(192	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	(106	)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		(6	)		—
	Non-utility revenue		17	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	(95	)	$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the six months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $2 million.

As of June 30, 2011, Con Edison had 1,705 contracts, including 699 CECONY contracts, which were considered to be derivatives under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging (excluding qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts). The following table presents the number of contracts by commodity type:

	Electric Derivatives								Gas Derivatives
	Number of Energy Contracts(a)		MWHs(b)		Number of Capacity Contracts(a)		MWs(b)		Number of Contracts(a)		Dths(b)		Total Number Of Contracts(a)
Con Edison		882		20,318,546		56		9,161		767		106,730,705		1,705
CECONY		177		4,966,000		—		—		522		97,880,000		699

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) Volumes are reported net of long and short positions.

The Companies also enter into electric congestion and gas basis swap contracts to hedge the congestion and transportation charges which are associated with electric and gas contracts and hedged volumes.

The collateral requirements associated with, and settlement of, derivative transactions are included in net cash flows from operating activities in the Companies’ consolidated statement of cash flows. Most derivative instrument contracts contain provisions that may require the Companies to provide collateral on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The amount of collateral to be provided will depend on the fair value of the derivative instruments and the Companies’ credit ratings.

30

The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position and collateral posted at June 30, 2011, and the additional collateral that would have been required to be posted had the lowest applicable credit rating been reduced one level and to below investment grade were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison(a)			CECONY(a)
Aggregate fair value – net liabilities	$	140		$	77
Collateral posted	$	40		$	31	(b)
Additional collateral(c) (downgrade one level from current ratings(d))	$	29		$	25
Additional collateral(c) (downgrade to below investment grade from current ratings(d))	$	149	(e)	$	66	(e)

(a) Non-derivative transactions for the purchase and sale of electricity and gas and qualifying derivative instruments, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales, are excluded from the table. These transactions primarily include purchases of electricity from independent system operators. In the event the Utilities and Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses were no longer extended unsecured credit for such purchases, the Companies would be required to post collateral, which at June 30, 2011, would have amounted to an estimated $161 million for Con Edison, including $52 million for CECONY. For certain other such non-derivative transactions, the Companies could be required to post collateral under certain circumstances, including in the event counterparties had reasonable grounds for insecurity.

(b) Across the Utilities’ energy derivative positions, credit limits for the same counterparties are generally integrated. At June 30, 2011, the Utilities posted combined collateral of $39 million, including an estimated $8 million attributable to O&R.

(c) The Companies measure the collateral requirements by taking into consideration the fair value amounts of derivative instruments that contain credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liabilities position plus amounts owed to counterparties for settled transactions and amounts required by counterparties for minimum financial security. The fair value amounts represent unrealized losses, net of any unrealized gains where the Companies have a legally enforceable right of setoff.

(d) The current ratings are Moody’s, S&P and Fitch long-term credit rating of, as applicable, Con Edison (Baa1/BBB+/BBB+), CECONY (A3/A-/A-) or O&R (Baa1/A-/A-). Credit ratings assigned by rating agencies are expressions of opinions that are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency.

(e) Derivative instruments that are net assets have been excluded from the table. At June 30, 2011, if Con Edison had been downgraded to below investment grade, it would have been required to post additional collateral for such derivative instruments of an estimated $24 million.

Interest Rate Swap

O&R has an interest rate swap pursuant to which it pays a fixed-rate of 6.09 percent and receives a LIBOR-based variable rate. The fair value of this interest rate swap at June 30, 2011 was an unrealized loss of $10 million, which has been included in Con Edison’s consolidated balance sheet as a noncurrent liability/fair value of derivative liabilities and a regulatory asset. The change in the fair value of the swap for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was not material. In the event O&R’s credit rating was downgraded to BBB- or lower by S&P or Baa3 or lower by Moody’s, the swap counterparty could elect to terminate the agreement and, if it did so, the parties would then be required to settle the transaction.

Note J — Fair Value Measurements

Reference is made to Note P to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 are summarized below.

	Level 1				Level 2				Level 3						Netting Adjustments(4)						Total
(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative assets:
Commodity(1)	$	1	$	—	$	56	$	24	$	100		$	18		$	(42	)	$	4		$	115		$	46
Other assets(3)		72		72		—		—		106			96			—			—			178			168
Total	$	73	$	72	$	56	$	24	$	206		$	114		$	(42	)	$	4		$	293		$	214
Derivative liabilities:
Commodity	$	4	$	1	$	144	$	93	$	130		$	23		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	136		$	65
Transfer in(5)(6)		—		—		5		5		—			—			—			—			5			5
Transfer out(5)(6)		—		—		—		—		(5	)		(5	)		—			—			(5	)		(5	)
Commodity(1)	$	4	$	1	$	149	$	98	$	125		$	18		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	136		$	65
Interest rate contract(2)		—		—		—		—		10			—			—			—			10			—
Total	$	4	$	1	$	149	$	98	$	135		$	18		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	146		$	65

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note I.

(2) See Note I.

31

(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.

(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(5) The Companies’ policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of the levels at the end of the reporting period.

(6) Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because of availability of observable market data due to decrease in the terms of certain contracts from beyond one year as of December 31, 2010 to less than one year as of June 30, 2011.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 are summarized below.

	Level 1				Level 2						Level 3						Netting Adjustments(4)						Total
(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative assets:
Commodity(1)	$	2	$	1	$	72		$	21		$	144		$	13		$	(112	)	$	13		$	106		$	48
Other assets(3)		65		64		—			—			101			92			—			—			166			156
Total	$	67	$	65	$	72		$	21		$	245		$	105		$	(112	)	$	13		$	272		$	204
Derivative liabilities:
Commodity	$	4	$	2	$	270		$	177		$	205		$	12		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	191		$	100
Transfer in(5)(6)(7)		—		—		(36	)		(36	)		(9	)		(9	)		—			—			(45	)		(45	)
Transfer out(5)(6)(7)		—		—		9			9			36			36			—			—			45			45
Commodity(1)	$	4	$	2	$	243		$	150		$	232		$	39		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	191		$	100
Interest rate contract(2)		—		—		—			—			10			—			—			—			10			—
Total	$	4	$	2	$	243		$	150		$	242		$	39		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	201		$	100

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

(2) See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.

(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(5) The Companies’ policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of the levels at the end of the reporting period.

(6) Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 because of reassessment of the levels in the fair value hierarchy within which certain inputs fall.

(7) Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because of availability of observable market data due to decrease in the terms of certain contracts from beyond one year as of December 31, 2009 to less than one year as of December 31, 2010.

The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy below.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of April 1, 2011			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities		Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2011
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(31	)	$	(14	)	$	14	$	5	$	—	$	(2	)	$	3		$	—	$	(25	)
Interest rate contract		(10	)		(1	)		—		—		—		—			1			—		(10	)
Other assets(1)		105			1			—		—		—		—			—			—		106
Total	$	64		$	(14	)	$	14	$	5	$	—	$	(2	)	$	4		$	—	$	71
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	2		$	(1	)	$	2	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(4	)	$	—	$	—
Other assets(1)		95			1			—		—		—		—			—			—		96
Total	$	97		$	—		$	2	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(4	)	$	—	$	96

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

32

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2011			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities		Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2011
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(88	)	$	2		$	45	$	14	$	—	$	(4	)	$	1		$	5	$	(25	)
Interest rate contract		(10	)		(2	)		—		—		—		—			2			—		(10	)
Other assets(1)		101			3			2		—		—		—			—			—		106
Total	$	3		$	3		$	47	$	14	$	—	$	(4	)	$	3		$	5	$	71
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(26	)	$	(3	)	$	20	$	11	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	5	$	—
Other assets(1)		92			3			1		—		—		—			—			—		96
Total	$	66		$	—		$	21	$	11	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	5	$	96

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy below.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
				Total Gains/(Losses) — Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of April 1, 2010			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities			Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2010
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(168	)	$	9		$	33		$	3	$	—	$	(2	)	$	6		$	18	$	(101	)
Interest rate contract		(11	)		(1	)		(1	)		—		—		—			1			—		(12	)
Other assets(1)		93			—			1			—		—		—			—			—		94
Total	$	(86	)	$	8		$	33		$	3	$	—	$	(2	)	$	7		$	18	$	(19	)
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(48	)	$	(2	)	$	3		$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(2	)	$	18	$	(30	)
Other assets(1)		84			—			1			—		—		—			—			—		85
Total	$	36		$	(2	)	$	4		$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(2	)	$	18	$	55

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

33

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2010			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities			Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2010
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(59	)	$	(34	)	$	(40	)	$	3	$	—	$	(3	)	$	14		$	18	$	(101	)
Interest rate contract		(11	)		(2	)		(1	)		—		—		—			2			—		(12	)
Other assets(1)		92			—			2			—		—		—			—			—		94
Total	$	22		$	(36	)	$	(39	)	$	3	$	—	$	(3	)	$	16		$	18	$	(19	)
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(5	)	$	(7	)	$	(30	)	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	18	$	(30	)
Other assets(1)		83			—			2			—		—		—			—			—		85
Total	$	78		$	(7	)	$	(28	)	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	18	$	55

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

For the Utilities, realized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported as part of purchased power, gas and fuel costs. The Utilities generally recover these costs in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable state public utilities commissions. See Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Unrealized gains and losses for commodity derivatives are generally deferred on the consolidated balance sheet in accordance with the accounting rules for regulated operations.

For the competitive energy businesses, realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported in non-utility revenues ($4 million loss and $27 million loss) and purchased power costs ($1 million loss and $49 million gain) on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported in non-utility revenues ($3 million loss and $33 million gain) and purchased power costs ($21 million gain and $40 million loss) on the consolidated income statement for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The change in fair value relating to Level 3 commodity derivative assets held at June 30, 2011 and 2010 is included in non-utility revenues ($13 million loss and $45 million loss), and purchased power costs ($6 million gain and $64 million gain) on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the change in fair value relating to Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities included in non-utility revenues ($25 million loss and $1 million gain) and purchased power costs ($36 million gain and $7 million loss) on the consolidated income statement.

The accounting rules for fair value measurements and disclosures require consideration of the impact of nonperformance risk (including credit risk) from a market participant perspective in the measurement of the fair value of assets and liabilities. At June 30, 2011, the Companies determined that nonperformance risk would have no material impact on their financial position or results of operations. To assess nonperformance risk, the Companies considered information such as collateral requirements, master netting arrangements, letters of credit and parent company guarantees, and applied a market-based method by using the counterparty’s (for an asset) or the Companies’ (for a liability) credit default swaps rates.

Note K — New Financial Accounting Standards

Reference is made to Note T to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amendments to the guidance for fair value measurement through Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, “Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair

34

Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs”. The amendments expand Accounting Standards Codification 820’s existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and makes other amendments. Many of these amendments were made to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The application of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the companies’ financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance for presentation of comprehensive income through ASU No. 2011-05, “Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income.” The amendments require that the comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. The amendments in this update are applicable retrospectively for public entities effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The application of this guidance does not have a material impact on the companies’ financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

35

Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

This combined management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (MD&A) relates to the consolidated financial statements (the Second Quarter Financial Statements) included in this report of two separate registrants: Consolidated Edison, Inc. (Con Edison) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (CECONY) and should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and the notes thereto. As used in this report, the term the “Companies” refers to Con Edison and CECONY. CECONY is a subsidiary of Con Edison and, as such, information in this MD&A about CECONY applies to Con Edison.

This MD&A should be read in conjunction with the Second Quarter Financial Statements and the notes thereto and the MD&A in Item 7 of the Companies’ combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (File Nos. 1-14514 and 1-1217, the Form 10-K) and the MD&A in Part 1, Item 2 of the Companies’ combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (File Nos. 1-14514 and 1-1217, the First Quarter Form 10-Q).

Information in any item of this report referred to in this discussion and analysis is incorporated by reference herein. The use of terms such as “see” or “refer to” shall be deemed to incorporate by reference into this discussion and analysis the information to which reference is made.

Con Edison, incorporated in New York State in 1997, is a holding company which owns all of the outstanding common stock of CECONY, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R) and the competitive energy businesses. As used in this report, the term the “Utilities” refers to CECONY and O&R.

CECONY’s principal business operations are its regulated electric, gas and steam delivery businesses. O&R’s principal business operations are its regulated electric and gas delivery businesses. The competitive energy businesses sell electricity to wholesale and retail customers, provide certain energy-related services, and participate in energy infrastructure projects. Con Edison is evaluating additional opportunities to invest in electric and gas-related businesses.

Con Edison’s strategy is to provide reliable energy services, maintain public and employee safety, promote energy efficiency, and develop cost-effective ways of performing its business. Con Edison seeks to be a responsible steward of the environment and enhance its relationships with customers, regulators and members of the communities it serves.

36

CECONY

Electric

CECONY provides electric service to approximately 3.3 million customers in all of New York City (except part of Queens) and most of Westchester County, an approximately 660 square mile service area with a population of more than nine million.

Gas

CECONY delivers gas to approximately 1.1 million customers in Manhattan, the Bronx and parts of Queens and Westchester County.

Steam

CECONY operates the largest steam distribution system in the United States by producing and delivering more than 23,000 MMlbs of steam annually to approximately 1,760 customers in parts of Manhattan.

O&R

Electric

O&R and its utility subsidiaries, Rockland Electric Company (RECO) and Pike County Power & Light Company (Pike) (together referred to herein as O&R) provide electric service to approximately 0.3 million customers in southeastern New York and in adjacent areas of northern New Jersey and northeastern Pennsylvania, an approximately 1,350 square mile service area.

Gas

O&R delivers gas to over 0.1 million customers in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of northeastern Pennsylvania.

Competitive Energy Businesses

Con Edison pursues competitive energy opportunities through three wholly-owned subsidiaries: Con Edison Solutions, Con Edison Energy and Con Edison Development. These businesses include the sales and related hedging of electricity to wholesale and retail customers, sales of certain energy-related products and services, and participation in energy infrastructure projects. At June 30, 2011, Con Edison’s equity investment in its competitive energy businesses was $367 million and their assets amounted to $852 million.

Certain financial data of Con Edison’s businesses is presented below:

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011										Six Months Ended June 30, 2011										At June 30, 2011
(Millions of Dollars, except percentages)	Operating Revenues					Net Income for Common Stock					Operating Revenues					Net Income for Common Stock					Assets
CECONY	$	2,416		81	%	$	157		95	%	$	5,125		81	%	$	426		89	%	$	32,226	89	%
O&R		178		6	%		4		2	%		419		6	%		23		5	%		2,301	7	%
Total Utilities		2,594		87	%		161		97	%		5,544		87	%		449		94	%		34,527	96	%
Con Edison Solutions (a)		351		11	%		7		4	%		695		11	%		34		7	%		320	1	%
Con Edison Energy (a)		56		2	%		1		1	%		121		2	%		2		1	%		83	—	%
Con Edison Development		1		—	%		1		1	%		3		—	%		—		—	%		474	1	%
Other (b)		(9	)	—	%		(5	)	(3	)%		(21	)	—	%		(8	)	(2	)%		615	2	%
Total Con Edison	$	2,993		100	%	$	165		100	%	$	6,342		100	%	$	477		100	%	$	36,019	100	%

(a) Net income from the competitive energy businesses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 includes $(1) million and $21 million, respectively, of net after-tax mark-to-market (losses)/gains (Con Edison Solutions, $(5) million and $14 million and Con Edison Energy, $4 million and $7 million).

(b) Represents inter-company and parent company accounting. See “Results of Operations,” below.

Con Edison’s net income for common stock for the three months ended June 30, 2011 was $165 million or $0.57 a share ($0.56 on a diluted basis) compared with earnings of $183 million or $0.65 a share ($0.64 on a diluted basis) for the three months ended June 30, 2010. Net income for common stock for the six months ended June 30, 2011 was $477 million or $1.63 a share ($1.62 on a diluted basis) compared with earnings of $409 million or $1.45 a share ($1.44 on a diluted basis) for the six months ended June 30, 2010. See “Results of Operations – Summary,” below. For segment financial information, see Note H to the Second Quarter Financial Statements and “Results of Operations,” below.

37

Results of Operations—Summary

Net income for common stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 was as follows:

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
CECONY	$	157		$	135		$	426		$	378
O&R		4			4			23			18
Competitive energy businesses (a)		9			48			36			19
Other (b)		(5	)		(4	)		(8	)		(6	)
Con Edison	$	165		$	183		$	477		$	409

(a) Includes $(1) million and $39 million of net after-tax mark-to-market (losses)/gains for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Includes $21 million and $1 million of net after-tax mark-to-market gains for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.

(b) Consists of inter-company and parent company accounting.

The Companies’ results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011, as compared with the 2010 period, reflect changes in the Utilities’ rate plans. These rate plans provide for additional revenues to cover expected increases in certain operations and maintenance expenses, and depreciation and property taxes. The results of operations include the operating results of the competitive energy businesses, including net mark-to-market effects.

Operations and maintenance expenses were higher in the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period reflecting higher costs for pension and other postretirement benefits and employee health insurance, offset in part by savings from cost control efforts in the 2011 period. Depreciation and property taxes were higher in the 2011 period reflecting primarily higher utility plant balances.

The following table presents the estimated effect on earnings per share and net income for common stock for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the 2010 period, resulting from these and other major factors:

	Three Months Variation						Six Months Variation
	Earnings per Share			Net Income for Common Stock (Millions of Dollars)			Earnings per Share			Net Income for Common Stock (Millions of Dollars)
CECONY
Rate plans, primarily to recover increases in certain costs	$	0.25		$	69		$	0.43		$	120
Operations and maintenance expense		(0.08	)		(24	)		(0.06	)		(17	)
Depreciation, property taxes and other tax matters		(0.09	)		(27	)		(0.19	)		(56	)
Interest expense		—			1			0.02			5
Other (includes dilutive effect of new stock issuances)		(0.02	)		3			(0.08	)		(4	)
Total CECONY		0.06			22			0.12			48
O&R		—			—			0.02			5
Competitive energy businesses
Earnings excluding net mark-to-market effects		—			1			(0.02	)		(4	)
Net mark-to-market effects		(0.14	)		(40	)		0.07			20
Total competitive energy businesses		(0.14	)		(39	)		0.05			16
Other, including parent company expenses		—			(1	)		(0.01	)		(1	)
Total	$	(0.08	)	$	(18	)	$	0.18		$	68

See “Results of Operations” below for further discussion and analysis of results of operations.

Risk Factors

The Companies’ businesses are influenced by many factors that are difficult to predict, and that involve uncertainties that may materially affect actual operating results, cash flows and financial condition. See “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of the Form 10-K.

38

Application of Critical Accounting Policies

The Companies’ financial statements reflect the application of their accounting policies, which conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The Companies’ critical accounting policies include industry-specific accounting applicable to regulated public utilities and accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits, contingencies, long-lived assets, derivative instruments, goodwill and leases. See “Application of Critical Accounting Policies” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Companies’ liquidity reflects cash flows from operating, investing and financing activities, as shown on their respective consolidated statement of cash flows and as discussed below. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K. Changes in the Companies’ cash and temporary cash investments resulting from operating, investing and financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 are summarized as follows:

	Con Edison									CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			Variance			2011			2010			Variance
Operating activities	$	1,589		$	795		$	794		$	1,425		$	737		$	688
Investing activities		(1,129	)		(1,007	)		(122	)		(983	)		(952	)		(31	)
Financing activities		(306	)		130			(436	)		(346	)		119			(465	)
Net change		154			(82	)		236			96			(96	)		192
Balance at beginning of period		338			260			78			78			131			(53	)
Balance at end of period	$	492		$	178		$	314		$	174		$	35		$	139

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

The Utilities’ cash flows from operating activities reflect principally their energy sales and deliveries and cost of operations. The volume of energy sales and deliveries is dependent primarily on factors external to the Utilities, such as growth of customer demand, weather, market prices for energy, economic conditions and measures that promote energy efficiency. Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms in CECONY’s electric and gas rate plans and O&R’s New York electric and gas rate plans, changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved may affect the timing of cash flows but not net income. See Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. The prices at which the Utilities provide energy to their customers are determined in accordance with their rate agreements. In general, changes in the Utilities’ cost of purchased power, fuel and gas may affect the timing of cash flows but not net income because the costs are recovered in accordance with rate agreements. See “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Net income is the result of cash and non-cash (or accrual) transactions. Only cash transactions affect the Companies’ cash flows from operating activities. Principal non-cash charges include depreciation, deferred income tax expense and net derivative losses. Non-cash charges or credits may also be accrued under the revenue decoupling and cost reconciliation mechanisms in the Utilities’ electric and gas rate plans in New York. See “Rate Agreements” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Net cash flows from operating activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 for Con Edison and CECONY were $794 million and $688 million higher, respectively, than in the 2010 period. The increases in net cash flows reflect primarily recoveries received in 2011 for costs incurred relating to the World Trade Center attack ($149 million), lower estimated income tax payments and refunds received in 2011 ($312 million for Con Edison and $265 million for CECONY), and lower cash collateral paid to brokers and counterparties in 2011 generally reflecting smaller decreases in hedged volume and in commodity prices for derivative transactions ($109 million for Con Edison and $73 million for CECONY), offset in part by increased pension contributions in 2011 ($198 million for Con Edison and CECONY).

39

The change in net cash flows also reflects the timing of payments for and recovery of energy costs. This timing is reflected within changes to accounts receivable – customers, recoverable energy costs and accounts payable balances.

Cash Flows Used in Investing Activities

Net cash flows used in investing activities for Con Edison and CECONY were $122 million and $31 million higher, respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The increase for Con Edison reflects primarily a loan receivable for the Pilesgrove solar project and higher construction expenditures related to other solar projects. See Note Q to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Net cash flows from financing activities for Con Edison and CECONY decreased $436 million and $465 million, respectively, in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period, primarily due to higher net cash flows from operating activities in the 2011 period.

Cash flows from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 also reflect the issuance of Con Edison common shares through its dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans (2011: 1.2 million shares for $49 million, 2010: 1.2 million shares for $25 million). In addition, as a result of the stock plan issuances, cash used to pay common stock dividends was reduced by $5 million and $24 million in the 2011 and 2010 periods, respectively. The number of shares issued through, and cash flows relating to, the plans in 2011, as compared with 2010, reflect the purchase in 2011 of shares in open-market transactions in connection with the plans.

The Companies had no issuances of long-term debt during the six months ended June 30, 2011. Net cash flows from financing activities during the six months ended June 30, 2010 also reflect the following CECONY transactions:

• Issued $350 million 4.45 percent 10-year debentures and $350 million 5.70 percent 30-year debentures; and

• Redeemed at maturity $325 million 8.125 percent 10-year debentures.

Con Edison’s net cash flows from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 also reflect the following O&R transactions:

• Redeemed in advance of maturity $45 million 7.00 percent 30-year debentures that were due in 2029; and

• Redeemed at maturity $55 million 7.50 percent 10-year debentures.

Cash flows from financing activities of the Companies also reflect commercial paper issuance (included on the consolidated balance sheets as “Notes payable”). The commercial paper amounts outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 and the average daily balances for 2011 and 2010 for Con Edison and CECONY were as follows:

	2011						2010
(Millions of Dollars, except Weighted Average Yield)	Outstanding at June 30			Daily average			Outstanding at December 31			Daily average
Con Edison	$	—		$	110		$	—		$	370
CECONY	$	—		$	110		$	—		$	352
Weighted average yield		—	%		0.3	%		—	%		0.4	%

Common stock issuances and external borrowings are sources of liquidity that could be affected by changes in credit ratings, financial performance and capital market conditions.

40

Other Changes in Assets and Liabilities

The following table shows changes in certain assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011, compared with December 31, 2010.

	Con Edison			CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011 vs. 2010 Variance			2011 vs. 2010 Variance
Assets
Regulatory asset – Unrecognized pension and other postretirement costs	$	(450	)	$	(424	)
Prepayments		(194	)		(9	)
Accrued unbilled revenue		(118	)		(85	)
Accounts receivable from affiliated companies		—			(213	)
Liabilities
Pension and retiree benefits		(621	)		(617	)
Regulatory liability – Net unbilled revenue deferrals – current		(19	)		(19	)
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits		251			271

Regulatory Asset for Unrecognized Pension and Other Postretirement Costs and Noncurrent Liability for Pension and Retiree Benefits

The decreases in the regulatory asset for unrecognized pension and other postretirement benefit costs and the noncurrent liability for pension and retiree benefits reflect the final actuarial valuation of the underfunding of the pension and other retiree benefit plans as measured at December 31, 2010, in accordance with the accounting rules for pensions. The decrease in the regulatory asset also reflects the year’s amortization of accounting costs. The decrease in the noncurrent liability for pension and retiree benefits also reflects the contributions to the pension plan made by CECONY in 2011. See Notes D and E to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Prepayments, Accounts Receivable from Affiliated Companies, Deferred Income Taxes and Investment Tax Credits

The decrease in prepayments for Con Edison and accounts receivable from affiliated companies for CECONY reflects primarily a federal tax refund received in the 2011 period. The increase in the liability for deferred income taxes and investment tax credits reflects the timing of the deduction of expenditures for utility plant which resulted in amounts being collected from customers to pay income taxes in advance of when the income tax payments will be required. See “Cash Flows from Operating Activities,” above, and Note L to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Accrued Unbilled Revenues and Regulatory Liability for Net Unbilled Revenues

The decrease in accrued unbilled revenues and the regulatory liability for net unbilled revenues reflects primarily the milder weather in June 2011 compared with December 2010.

Capital Requirements and Resources

At June 30, 2011, there was no material change in the Companies’ capital requirements and resources compared to those disclosed under “Capital Requirements and Resources – Capital Resources” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K, other than as described below.

41

For each of the Companies, the ratio of earnings to fixed charges (Securities and Exchange Commission basis) for the six months ended June 30, 2011, the twelve months ended December 31, 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2010 was:

	Earnings to Fixed Charges (Times)
	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011		For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2010		For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Con Edison		3.2		3.3		3.0
CECONY		3.3		3.4		3.1

For each of the Companies, the common equity ratio at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 was:

	Common Equity Ratio (Percent of total capitalization)
	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Con Edison		50.8		50.4
CECONY		50.1		49.9

Contractual Obligations

At June 30, 2011, there were no material changes in the Companies’ aggregate obligation to make payments pursuant to contracts compared to those discussed under “Capital Requirements and Resources – Contractual Obligations” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K. In August 2011, CECONY extended an existing power purchase agreement with Entergy Nuclear Power Marketing, LLC. See Note I to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. The contracted output for 2011 and 2012 remains 350 MW and increases to 500 MW for 2013 through 2017.

Electric Power Requirements

At June 30, 2011, there were no material changes in the Companies’ electric power requirements compared to those disclosed under “Electric Operations – Electric Supply” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K. See “Contractual Obligations,” above.

Regulatory Matters

For Information about the Utilities’ rate plans and other regulatory matters affecting the Companies, see “Utility Regulation” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K and “Rate Agreements” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note B to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Financial and Commodity Market Risks

The Companies are subject to various risks and uncertainties associated with financial and commodity markets. The most significant market risks include interest rate risk, commodity price risk, credit risk and investment risk. At June 30, 2011, there were no material changes in the Companies’ financial and commodity market risks compared to those discussed under “Financial and Commodity Market Risks” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K, other than as described below and in Note I to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Commodity Price Risk

Con Edison’s commodity price risk relates primarily to the purchase and sale of electricity, gas and related derivative instruments. The Utilities and Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses have risk management strategies to mitigate their related exposures. See Note I to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Con Edison estimates that, as of June 30, 2011, a 10 percent decline in market prices would result in a decline in fair value of $94 million for the derivative instruments used by the Utilities to hedge purchases of electricity and gas, of which $78 million is for CECONY and $16 million is for O&R. Con Edison expects that any such change in fair value would be largely offset by directionally opposite changes in the cost of the electricity and gas purchased. In accordance with provisions approved by state regulators, the Utilities generally recover from customers the costs they incur for energy purchased for their customers, including gains and losses on certain derivative instruments used to hedge energy purchased and related costs. See “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

42

Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses use a value-at-risk (VaR) model to assess the market risk of their electricity and gas commodity fixed-price purchase and sales commitments, physical forward contracts and commodity derivative instruments. VaR represents the potential change in fair value of instruments or the portfolio due to changes in market factors, for a specified time period and confidence level. These businesses estimate VaR across their electricity and natural gas commodity businesses using a delta-normal variance/covariance model with a 95 percent confidence level. Since the VaR calculation involves complex methodologies and estimates and assumptions that are based on past experience, it is not necessarily indicative of future results. VaR for transactions associated with hedges on generating assets and commodity contracts, assuming a one-day holding period, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010 was as follows:

95% Confidence Level, One-Day Holding Period	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
	(Millions of Dollars)
Average for the period	$	1	$	1
High		1		1
Low		—		—

Credit Risk

The Companies are exposed to credit risk related to transactions entered into primarily for the various energy supply and hedging activities by the Utilities and the competitive energy businesses. Credit risk relates to the loss that may result from a counterparty’s nonperformance. The Companies use credit policies to manage this risk, including an established credit approval process, monitoring of counterparty limits, netting provisions within agreements and collateral or prepayment arrangements, credit insurance and credit default swaps. The Companies measure credit risk exposure as the replacement cost for open energy commodity and derivative positions plus amounts owed from counterparties for settled transactions. The replacement cost of open positions represents unrealized gains, net of any unrealized losses where the Companies have a legally enforceable right of setoff. See “Credit Exposure” in Note I to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Environmental Matters

For information concerning climate change, environmental sustainability, potential liabilities arising from laws and regulations protecting the environment and other environmental matters, see “Environmental Matters” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K and Notes F and G to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Impact of Inflation

The Companies are affected by the decline in the purchasing power of the dollar caused by inflation. Regulation permits the Utilities to recover through depreciation only the historical cost of their plant assets even though in an inflationary economy the cost to replace the assets upon their retirement will substantially exceed historical costs. The impact is, however, partially offset by the repayment of the Companies’ long-term debt in dollars of lesser value than the dollars originally borrowed.

Material Contingencies

For information concerning potential liabilities arising from the Companies’ material contingencies, see “Application of Critical Accounting Policies – Accounting for Contingencies,” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K and Notes B, F and G to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Results of Operations

See “Results of Operations – Summary,” above.

Results of operations reflect, among other things, the Companies’ accounting policies (see “Application of Critical Accounting Policies,” in Item 7 of the Form 10-K) and rate plans that limit the rates the Utilities can charge their customers (see “Utility Regulation” in Item 1 of the Form 10-K). Under the revenue decoupling mechanisms currently applicable to CECONY’s electric and gas businesses and O&R’s electric and gas businesses in New York, the Utilities’ delivery revenues generally will not be affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Revenues for CECONY’s steam business and O&R’s businesses in New Jersey and Pennsylvania are affected by changes in delivery volumes resulting from weather, economic conditions and other factors. See Note B to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

43

In general, the Utilities recover on a current basis the fuel, gas purchased for resale and purchased power costs they incur in supplying energy to their full-service customers (see “Recoverable Energy Costs” in Note A and “Regulatory Matters” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K). Accordingly, such costs do not generally affect the Companies’ results of operations. Management uses the term “net revenues” (operating revenues less such costs) to identify changes in operating revenues that may affect the Companies’ results of operations. Management believes that, although “net revenues” may not be a measure determined in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the measure facilitates the analysis by management and investors of the Companies’ results of operations.

Con Edison’s principal business segments are CECONY’s regulated electric, gas and steam utility activities, O&R’s regulated electric and gas utility activities and Con Edison’s competitive energy businesses. CECONY’s principal business segments are its regulated electric, gas and steam utility activities. A discussion of the results of operations by principal business segment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 follows. For additional business segment financial information, see Note H to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Three Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared with Three Months Ended June 30, 2010

The Companies’ results of operations in 2011 compared with 2010 were:

	CECONY						O&R						Competitive Energy Businesses and Other (a)						Con Edison (b)
(Millions of Dollars)	Increases (Decreases) Amount			Increases (Decreases) Percent			Increases (Decreases) Amount			Increases (Decreases) Percent			Increases (Decreases) Amount			Increases (Decreases) Percent			Increases (Decreases) Amount			Increases (Decreases) Percent
Operating revenues	$	(16	)		(0.7	)%	$	(10	)		(5.3	)%	$	2			0.5	%	$	(24	)		(0.8	)%
Purchased power		(166	)		(21.1	)		(16	)		(22.2	)		62			22.1			(120	)		(10.5	)
Fuel		(19	)		(21.8	)		N/A			N/A			—			—			(19	)		(21.8	)
Gas purchased for resale		41			80.4			(2	)		(13.3	)		5			Large			44			65.7
Operating revenues less purchased power, fuel and gas purchased for resale (net revenues)		128			8.5			8			7.9			(65	)		(56.5	)		71			4.1
Other operations and maintenance		43			7.3			6			9.4			5			19.2			54			8.0
Depreciation and amortization		9			4.6			1			9.1			(2	)		(50.0	)		8			3.8
Taxes, other than income taxes		40			10.3			—			—			—			—			40			9.9
Operating income		36			10.8			1			7.1			(68	)		(84.0	)		(31	)		(7.2	)
Other income less deductions		(12	)		Large			1			Large			4			Large			(7	)		(58.3	)
Net interest expense		(1	)		(0.7	)		2			25.0			2			40.0			3			2.0
Income before income tax expense		25			11.9			—			—			(66	)		(86.8	)		(41	)		(14.0	)
Income tax expense		3			4.2			—			—			(26	)		(81.3	)		(23	)		(21.7	)
Net income for common stock	$	22			16.3	%	$	—			—	%	$	(40	)		(90.9	)%	$	(18	)		(9.8	)%

(a) Includes inter-company and parent company accounting.

(b) Represents the consolidated financial results of Con Edison and its businesses.

CECONY

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011									Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Electric		Gas		Steam			2011 Total		Electric		Gas		Steam			2010 Total		2011-2010 Variation
Operating revenues	$	2,013	$	296	$	107		$	2,416	$	2,104	$	239	$	89		$	2,432	$	(16	)
Purchased power		609		—		12			621		777		—		10			787		(166	)
Fuel		40		—		28			68		58		—		29			87		(19	)
Gas purchased for resale		—		92		—			92		—		51		—			51		41
Net revenues		1,364		204		67			1,635		1,269		188		50			1,507		128
Operations and maintenance		504		90		37			631		469		74		45			588		43
Depreciation and amortization		162		27		16			205		156		25		15			196		9
Taxes, other than income taxes		348		56		25			429		325		45		19			389		40
Operating income	$	350	$	31	$	(11	)	$	370	$	319	$	44	$	(29	)	$	334	$	36

44

Electric

CECONY’s results of electric operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	2,013	$	2,104	$	(91	)
Purchased power		609		777		(168	)
Fuel		40		58		(18	)
Net revenues		1,364		1,269		95
Operations and maintenance		504		469		35
Depreciation and amortization		162		156		6
Taxes, other than income taxes		348		325		23
Electric operating income	$	350	$	319	$	31

CECONY’s electric sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Millions of kWhs Delivered										Revenues in Millions
	Three Months Ended										Three Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation
Residential/Religious (a)		2,462		2,492		(30	)		(1.2	)%	$	652	$	681	$	(29	)		(4.3	)%
Commercial/Industrial		2,614		2,816		(202	)		(7.2	)		556		642		(86	)		(13.4	)
Retail access customers		5,630		5,326		304			5.7			554		500		54			10.8
NYPA, Municipal Agency and other sales		2,530		2,654		(124	)		(4.7	)		140		124		16			12.9
Other operating revenues		—		—		—			—			111		157		(46	)		(29.3	)
Total		13,236		13,288		(52	)		(0.4	)%	$	2,013	$	2,104	$	(91	)		(4.3	)%

(a) “Residential/Religious” generally includes single-family dwellings, individual apartments in multi-family dwellings, religious organizations and certain other not-for-profit organizations.

CECONY’s electric operating revenues decreased $91 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to lower purchased power ($168 million) and fuel costs ($18 million), offset in part by higher revenues from the electric rate plan ($93 million, which includes $9 million accrued revenues pursuant to the rate plan’s revenue decoupling mechanism). CECONY’s revenues from electric sales are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which delivery revenues generally are not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Other electric operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the revenue decoupling mechanism and other provisions of the company’s rate plans. See “Rate Agreements – CECONY – Electric” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Electric delivery volumes in CECONY’s service area decreased 0.4 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for variations, principally weather and billing days, electric delivery volumes in CECONY’s service area decreased 1.4 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period.

CECONY’s electric purchased power costs decreased $168 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to a decrease in unit costs ($124 million) and purchased volumes ($44 million). Electric fuel costs decreased $18 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to lower sendout volumes from the company’s electric generating facilities ($10 million) and unit costs ($8 million).

45

CECONY’s electric operating income increased $31 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($95 million, due primarily to the electric rate plan, including the collection of a surcharge for a New York State assessment). The increase in electric net revenues was offset by higher operations and maintenance costs ($35 million, due primarily to higher pension expense ($35 million) and employees’ health insurance costs ($16 million), offset by a decrease in the collection of surcharges from customers ($9 million) and cost control efforts), taxes, other than income taxes ($23 million, principally property taxes) and depreciation and amortization ($6 million). See “Regulatory Assets and

Liabilities” in Note B to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Gas

CECONY’s results of gas operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	296	$	239	$	57
Gas purchased for resale		92		51		41
Net revenues		204		188		16
Operations and maintenance		90		74		16
Depreciation and amortization		27		25		2
Taxes, other than income taxes		56		45		11
Gas operating income	$	31	$	44	$	(13	)

CECONY’s gas sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Thousands of dths Delivered										Revenues in Millions
	Three Months Ended										Three Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			Variation		Percent Variation
Residential		7,373		5,877		1,496			25.5	%	$	145		$	130		$	15		11.5	%
General		5,175		4,677		498			10.6			72			72			—		—
Firm transportation		11,273		9,352		1,921			20.5			74			65			9		13.8
Total firm sales and transportation		23,821		19,906		3,915			19.7			291			267			24		9.0
Interruptible sales (a)		2,697		1,655		1,042			63.0			22			5			17		Large
NYPA		5,315		6,080		(765	)		(12.6	)		1			1			—		—
Generation plants		21,847		19,950		1,897			9.5			9			9			—		—
Other		5,132		3,923		1,209			30.8			11			8			3		37.5
Other operating revenues		—		—		—			—			(38	)		(51	)		13		25.5
Total		58,812		51,514		7,298			14.2	%	$	296		$	239		$	57		23.8	%

(a) Includes 1,126 mdths and 462 mdths for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are also reflected in firm transportation and other.

CECONY’s gas operating revenues increased $57 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to an increase in gas purchased for resale costs ($41 million). CECONY’s revenues from gas sales are subject to a weather normalization clause and a revenue decoupling mechanism as a result of which delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Other gas operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the company’s rate plans. See “Rate Agreements – CECONY – Gas” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

CECONY’s sales and transportation volumes for firm customers increased 19.7 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for variations, principally weather and billing days, firm gas sales and transportation volumes in the company’s service area increased 3.0 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011 reflecting an increase in the number of customers.

46

CECONY’s purchased gas cost increased $41 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to higher unit costs ($25 million) and sendout volumes ($16 million).

CECONY’s gas operating income decreased $13 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The decrease reflects primarily higher operations and maintenance costs ($16 million, due primarily to an increase in pension expense ($6 million) and the surcharge for a New York State assessment ($5 million)), taxes, other than income taxes ($11 million, principally property taxes) and depreciation and amortization ($2 million), offset by higher net revenues ($16 million).

Steam

CECONY’s results of steam operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			Variation
Operating revenues	$	107		$	89		$	18
Purchased power		12			10			2
Fuel		28			29			(1	)
Net revenues		67			50			17
Operations and maintenance		37			45			(8	)
Depreciation and amortization		16			15			1
Taxes, other than income taxes		25			19			6
Steam operating income	$	(11	)	$	(29	)	$	18

CECONY’s steam sales and deliveries for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Millions of Pounds Delivered									Revenues in Millions
	Three Months Ended									Three Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation		Percent Variation			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation
General		73		48		25		52.1	%	$	4		$	3	$	1			33.3	%
Apartment house		1,124		957		167		17.5			30			23		7			30.4
Annual power		3,059		2,682		377		14.1			81			61		20			32.8
Other operating revenues		—		—		—		—			(8	)		2		(10	)		Large
Total		4,256		3,687		569		15.4	%	$	107		$	89	$	18			20.2	%

CECONY’s steam operating revenues increased $18 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to the net change in rates under the steam rate plans ($6 million), the colder weather in 2011 compared with the 2010 period ($10 million) and higher purchased power costs ($2 million). Other steam operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the company’s rate plans. See “Rate Agreements – CECONY – Steam” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Steam sales and delivery volumes increased 15.4 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for variations, principally weather and billing days, steam sales and deliveries decreased 0.3 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011.

CECONY’s steam purchased power costs increased $2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to an increase in unit costs ($8 million), offset by a decrease in purchased volumes ($6 million). Steam purchased fuel costs decreased $1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to lower sendout volumes ($1 million).

Steam operating income increased $18 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($17 million) and lower operations and maintenance costs ($8 million, due primarily to lower pension expense ($6 million)), offset by higher taxes, other than income taxes ($6 million, principally property taxes) and depreciation and amortization ($1 million).

47

Other Income (Deductions)

Other income (deductions) decreased $12 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period primarily reflecting lower financing charges on changes in World Trade Center regulatory assets and liabilities. See “Cash Flows from Operating Activities,” above and “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities” in Note B to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

O&R

	Three Months Ended June 30, 2011						Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Electric		Gas		2011 Total		Electric		Gas			2010 Total		2011-2010 Variation
Operating revenues	$	141	$	37	$	178	$	153	$	35		$	188	$	(10	)
Purchased power		56		—		56		72		—			72		(16	)
Gas purchased for resale		—		13		13		—		15			15		(2	)
Net revenues		85		24		109		81		20			101		8
Operations and maintenance		54		16		70		49		15			64		6
Depreciation and amortization		8		4		12		8		3			11		1
Taxes, other than income taxes		9		3		12		9		3			12		—
Operating income	$	14	$	1	$	15	$	15	$	(1	)	$	14	$	1

Electric

O&R’s results of electric operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	141	$	153	$	(12	)
Purchased power		56		72		(16	)
Net revenues		85		81		4
Operations and maintenance		54		49		5
Depreciation and amortization		8		8		—
Taxes, other than income taxes		9		9		—
Electric operating income	$	14	$	15	$	(1	)

O&R’s electric sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Millions of kWhs Delivered										Revenues in Millions
	Three Months Ended										Three Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			Variation			Percent Variation
Residential/Religious (a)		381		419		(38	)		(9.1	)%	$	66		$	73		$	(7	)		(9.6	)%
Commercial/Industrial		281		366		(85	)		(23.2	)		38			49			(11	)		(22.4	)
Retail access customers		664		546		118			21.6			36			29			7			24.1
Public authorities		26		27		(1	)		(3.7	)		2			3			(1	)		(33.3	)
Other operating revenues		—		—		—			—			(1	)		(1	)		—			—
Total		1,352		1,358		(6	)		(0.4	)%	$	141		$	153		$	(12	)		(7.8	)%

(a) “Residential/Religious” generally includes single-family dwellings, individual apartments in multi-family dwellings, religious organizations and certain other not-for-profit organizations.

O&R’s electric operating revenues decreased $12 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to lower costs for purchased power ($16 million). O&R’s New York electric delivery revenues are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which, delivery

48

revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. O&R’s electric sales in New Jersey and Pennsylvania are not subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, and as a result, changes in such volumes do impact revenues. Other electric operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the company’s electric rate plan. See “Rate Agreements – O&R – Electric” in Note B to the Second Quarter Financial Statements and Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Electric delivery volumes in O&R’s service area decreased 0.4 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for weather variations, electric delivery volumes in O&R’s service area increased 1.4 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period reflecting higher average normalized use per customer.

Electric operating income decreased $1 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The decrease reflects primarily higher operations and maintenance costs ($5 million, due primarily to higher pension expense ($3 million)), offset by higher net revenues ($4 million).

Gas

O&R’s results of gas operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010			Variation
Operating revenues	$	37	$	35		$	2
Gas purchased for resale		13		15			(2	)
Net revenues		24		20			4
Operations and maintenance		16		15			1
Depreciation and amortization		4		3			1
Taxes, other than income taxes		3		3			—
Gas operating income	$	1	$	(1	)	$	2

O&R’s gas sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Thousands of dths Delivered										Revenues in Millions
	Three Months Ended										Three Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation		Percent Variation
Residential		965		835		130			15.6	%	$	15	$	15	$	—		—	%
General		191		155		36			23.2			3		3		—		—
Firm transportation		1,649		1,379		270			19.6			13		12		1		8.3
Total firm sales and transportation		2,805		2,369		436			18.4			31		30		1		3.3
Interruptible sales		991		1,057		(66	)		(6.2	)		1		1		—		—
Generation plants		652		263		389			Large			—		—		—		—
Other		136		107		29			27.1			—		—		—		—
Other gas revenues		—		—		—			—			5		4		1		25.0
Total		4,584		3,796		788			20.8	%	$	37	$	35	$	2		5.7	%

O&R’s gas operating revenues increased $2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to the gas rate plan, offset in part by the decrease in gas purchased for resale ($2 million).

49

Sales and transportation volumes for firm customers increased 18.4 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for weather and other variations, total firm sales and transportation volumes increased 1.1 percent in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. O&R’s New York revenues from gas sales are subject to a weather normalization clause and a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which delivery revenues are generally not affected

by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved.

Gas operating income increased $2 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($4 million), offset by higher operations and maintenance costs ($1 million) and depreciation and amortization ($1 million).

Competitive Energy Businesses

The competitive energy business’s results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Three Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	406	$	406	$	—
Purchased power		348		289		59
Gas purchased for resale		5		1		4
Net revenues		53		116		(63	)
Operations and maintenance		32		27		5
Depreciation and amortization		2		4		(2	)
Taxes, other than income taxes		5		4		1
Operating income	$	14	$	81	$	(67	)

The competitive energy businesses’ operating revenues were the same in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. Electric wholesale revenues decreased $35 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to lower sales volume ($26 million) and unit prices ($9 million). Electric retail revenues decreased $7 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to lower unit prices ($15 million), offset by higher sales volume ($8 million). Gross margins on electric retail revenues increased in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to higher unit gross margins. Net mark-to-market values decreased $67 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the 2010 period, of which $100 million in losses are reflected in purchased power costs and $33 million in gains are reflected in revenues. Other revenues increased $9 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the 2010 period due primarily to higher sales of energy efficiency services ($3 million).

Purchased power costs increased $59 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to changes in mark-to-market values ($100 million) and lower purchased power costs ($42 million, due to lower unit prices ($27 million) and volumes ($15 million)). Operating income decreased $67 million in the three months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to net mark-to-market effects ($67 million).

Other

For Con Edison, “Other” also includes inter-company eliminations relating to operating revenues and operating expenses.

50

Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

The Companies’ results of operations in 2011 compared with 2010 were:

	CECONY						O&R						Competitive Energy Businesses and Other (a)						Con Edison (b)
(Millions of Dollars)	Increases (Decreases) Amount			Increases (Decreases) Percent			Increases (Decreases) Amount			Increases (Decreases) Percent			Increases (Decreases) Amount			Increases (Decreases) Percent			Increases (Decreases) Amount			Increases (Decreases) Percent
Operating revenues	$	(25	)		(0.5	)%	$	(20	)		(4.6	)%	$	(91	)		(10.2	)%	$	(136	)		(2.1	)%
Purchased power		(235	)		(17.6	)		(35	)		(22.2	)		(127	)		(16.2	)		(397	)		(17.4	)
Fuel		7			3.0			N/A			N/A			—			—			7			3.0
Gas purchased for resale		10			2.9			(5	)		(8.6	)		3			42.9			8			2.0
Operating revenues less purchased power, fuel and gas purchased for resale (net revenues)		193			6.0			20			9.0			33			34.4			246			6.9
Other operations and maintenance		32			2.7			8			6.0			10			19.6			50			3.6
Depreciation and amortization		22			5.7			2			9.1			(2	)		(40.0	)		22			5.3
Taxes, other than income taxes		68			8.5			—			—			3			37.5			71			8.5
Operating income		71			8.4			10			23.3			22			68.8			103			11.2
Other income less deductions		(12	)		(70.6	)		1			Large			5			Large			(6	)		(28.6	)
Net interest expense		(2	)		(0.7	)		4			25.0			3			27.3			5			1.7
Income before income tax expense		61			10.3			7			25.9			24			96.0			92			14.3
Income tax expense		13			6.3			2			22.2			9			75.0			24			10.5
Net income for common stock	$	48			12.7	%	$	5			27.8	%	$	15			Large		$	68			16.6	%

(a) Includes inter-company and parent company accounting.

(b) Represents the consolidated financial results of Con Edison and its businesses.

CECONY

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011								Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Electric		Gas		Steam		2011 Total		Electric		Gas		Steam		2010 Total		2011- 2010 Variation
Operating revenues	$	3,734	$	959	$	432	$	5,125	$	3,832	$	922	$	396	$	5,150	$	(25	)
Purchased power		1,073		—		31		1,104		1,307		—		32		1,339		(235	)
Fuel		116		—		128		244		117		—		120		237		7
Gas purchased for resale		—		355		—		355		—		345		—		345		10
Net revenues		2,545		604		273		3,422		2,408		577		244		3,229		193
Operations and maintenance		963		192		72		1,227		937		162		96		1,195		32
Depreciation and amortization		324		54		32		410		307		50		31		388		22
Taxes, other than income taxes		692		121		55		868		650		106		44		800		68
Operating income	$	566	$	237	$	114	$	917	$	514	$	259	$	73	$	846	$	71

51

Electric

CECONY’s results of electric operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Six Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	3,734	$	3,832	$	(98	)
Purchased power		1,073		1,307		(234	)
Fuel		116		117		(1	)
Net revenues		2,545		2,408		137
Operations and maintenance		963		937		26
Depreciation and amortization		324		307		17
Taxes, other than income taxes		692		650		42
Electric operating income	$	566	$	514	$	52

CECONY’s electric sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Millions of kWhs Delivered										Revenues in Millions
	Six Months Ended										Six Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation
Residential/Religious (a)		5,126		5,163		(37	)		(0.7	)%	$	1,300	$	1,313	$	(13	)		(1.0	)%
Commercial/Industrial		5,474		5,809		(335	)		(5.8	)		1,118		1,196		(78	)		(6.5	)
Retail access customers		11,188		10,710		478			4.5			1,027		968		59			6.1
NYPA, Municipal Agency and other sales		5,304		5,553		(249	)		(4.5	)		257		246		11			4.5
Other operating revenues		—		—		—			—			32		109		(77	)		(70.6	)
Total		27,092		27,235		(143	)		(0.5	)%	$	3,734	$	3,832	$	(98	)		(2.6	)%

(a) “Residential/Religious” generally includes single-family dwellings, individual apartments in multi-family dwellings, religious organizations and certain other not-for-profit organizations.

CECONY’s electric operating revenues decreased $98 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to lower purchased power costs ($234 million), offset in part by higher revenues from the electric rate plan ($143 million, which reflects among other things, reductions in revenues pursuant to the rate plan’s revenue decoupling mechanism ($19 million) and reconciliations of costs for municipal infrastructure support and capital expenditures ($11 million). CECONY’s revenues from electric sales are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which delivery revenues generally are not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Other electric operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the revenue decoupling mechanism and other provisions of the company’s rate plans. See “Rate Agreements – CECONY – Electric” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Electric delivery volumes in CECONY’s service area decreased 0.5 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for variations, principally weather and billing days, electric delivery volumes in CECONY’s service area decreased 1.3 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period.

CECONY’s electric purchased power costs decreased $234 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to a decrease in unit costs ($167 million) and purchased volumes ($67 million). Electric fuel costs decreased $1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to lower sendout volumes from the company’s electric generating facilities ($2 million), offset by higher unit costs ($1 million).

52

CECONY’s electric operating income increased $52 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($137 million, due primarily to the electric rate plan), offset by higher taxes, other than income taxes ($42 million, principally property taxes), operations and maintenance costs ($26 million, due primarily to higher pension expense ($29 million) and employees’ health insurance costs ($10 million), offset in part by lower costs for injuries and damages ($7 million) and cost control efforts) and depreciation and amortization ($17 million). See “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities” in Note B to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Gas

CECONY’s results of gas operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Six Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	959	$	922	$	37
Gas purchased for resale		355		345		10
Net revenues		604		577		27
Operations and maintenance		192		162		30
Depreciation and amortization		54		50		4
Taxes, other than income taxes		121		106		15
Gas operating income	$	237	$	259	$	(22	)

CECONY’s gas sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Thousands of dths Delivered										Revenues in Millions
	Six Months Ended										Six Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			Variation			Percent Variation
Residential		26,156		25,223		933			3.7	%	$	471		$	476		$	(5	)		(1.1	)%
General		18,686		16,165		2,521			15.6			224			229			(5	)		(2.2	)
Firm transportation		35,108		32,287		2,821			8.7			218			218			—			—
Total firm sales and transportation		79,950		73,675		6,275			8.5			913			923			(10	)		(1.1	)
Interruptible sales (a)		6,259		4,572		1,687			36.9			55			34			21			61.8
NYPA		11,135		12,122		(987	)		(8.1	)		1			1			—			—
Generation plants		34,206		32,215		1,991			6.2			16			17			(1	)		(5.9	)
Other		12,819		11,985		834			7.0			34			33			1			3.0
Other operating revenues		—		—		—			—			(60	)		(86	)		26			(30.2	)
Total		144,369		134,569		9,8			7.3	%	$	959		$	922		$	37			4.0	%

(a) Includes 2,075 mdths and 1,448 mdths for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, which are also reflected in firm transportation and other.

CECONY’s gas operating revenues increased $37 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to higher revenues from the gas rate plans ($54 million). CECONY’s revenues from gas sales are subject to a weather normalization clause and a revenue decoupling mechanism as a result of which delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. Other gas operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the company’s rate plans. See “Rate Agreements – CECONY – Gas” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

CECONY’s sales and transportation volumes for firm customers increased 8.5 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for variations, principally weather and billing days, firm gas sales and transportation volumes in the company’s service area increased 1.8 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 reflecting an increase in the number of customers, offset in part by net transfers from firm service to interruptible service.

CECONY’s purchased gas cost increased $10 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to higher sendout volumes ($35 million), offset by lower unit costs ($25 million).

53

CECONY’s gas operating income decreased $22 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The decrease reflects primarily higher operations and maintenance costs ($30 million, due primarily to an increase in the surcharge for a New York State assessment ($8 million), pension expense ($12 million) and employees’ health insurance costs ($2 million)), taxes, other than income taxes ($15 million, principally property taxes) and depreciation and amortization ($4 million), offset by higher net revenues ($27 million).

Steam

CECONY’s results of steam operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Six Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	432	$	396	$	36
Purchased power		31		32		(1	)
Fuel		128		120		8
Net revenues		273		244		29
Operations and maintenance		72		96		(24	)
Depreciation and amortization		32		31		1
Taxes, other than income taxes		55		44		11
Steam operating income	$	114	$	73	$	41

CECONY’s steam sales and deliveries for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Millions of Pounds Delivered									Revenues in Millions
	Six Months Ended									Six Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation		Percent Variation			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation
General		408		366		42		11.5	%	$	20		$	17	$	3			17.6	%
Apartment house		3,716		3,467		249		7.2			114			101		13			12.9
Annual power		9,600		9,069		531		5.9			315			276		39			14.1
Other operating revenues		—		—		—		—			(17	)		2		(19	)		Large
Total		13,724		12,902		822		6.4	%	$	432		$	396	$	36			9.1	%

CECONY’s steam operating revenues increased $36 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to higher fuel costs ($8 million), the net change in rates under the steam rate plan ($12 million) and colder winter weather in 2011 compared with the 2010 period ($18 million), offset in part by lower purchased power costs ($1 million). Other steam operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the company’s rate plans. See “Rate Agreements – CECONY – Steam” in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Steam sales and delivery volumes increased 6.4 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for variations, principally weather and billing days, steam sales and deliveries decreased 1.7 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 reflecting lower average normalized use per customer.

CECONY’s steam purchased fuel costs increased $8 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to higher unit costs ($5 million) and sendout volumes ($3 million). Steam purchased power costs decreased $1 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to a decrease in unit costs ($6 million), offset by an increase in purchased volumes ($5 million).

Steam operating income increased $41 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($29 million) and lower operations and maintenance costs ($24 million, due primarily to lower pension expense ($19 million)), offset by higher taxes, other than income taxes ($11 million, principally property taxes) and depreciation and amortization ($1 million).

54

Other Income (Deductions)

Other income (deductions) decreased $12 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period primarily reflecting lower financing charges on changes in World Trade Center regulatory assets and liabilities. See “Cash Flows from Operating Activities,” above and “Regulatory Assets and Liabilities” in Note B to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

O&R

	Six Months Ended June 30, 2011						Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Electric		Gas		2011 Total		Electric		Gas		2010 Total		2011-2010 Variation
Operating revenues	$	289	$	130	$	419	$	314	$	125	$	439	$	(20	)
Purchased power		123		—		123		158		—		158		(35	)
Gas purchased for resale		—		53		53		—		58		58		(5	)
Net revenues		166		77		243		156		67		223		20
Operations and maintenance		107		34		141		100		33		133		8
Depreciation and amortization		17		7		24		16		6		22		2
Taxes, other than income taxes		17		8		25		18		7		25		—
Operating income	$	25	$	28	$	53	$	22	$	21	$	43	$	10

Electric

O&R’s results of electric operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Six Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	289	$	314	$	(25	)
Purchased power		123		158		(35	)
Net revenues		166		156		10
Operations and maintenance		107		100		7
Depreciation and amortization		17		16		1
Taxes, other than income taxes		17		18		(1	)
Electric operating income	$	25	$	22	$	3

O&R’s electric sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Millions of kWhs Delivered										Revenues in Millions
	Six Months Ended										Six Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation			June 30, 2011			June 30, 2010			Variation			Percent Variation
Residential/Religious (a)		810		867		(57	)		(6.6	)%	$	140		$	153		$	(13	)		(8.5	)%
Commercial/Industrial		597		748		(151	)		(20.2	)		79			103			(24	)		(23.3	)
Retail access customers		1,290		1,053		237			22.5			68			55			13			23.6
Public authorities		50		54		(4	)		(7.4	)		5			6			(1	)		(16.7	)
Other operating revenues		—		—		—			—			(3	)		(3	)		—			—
Total		2,747		2,722		25			0.9	%	$	289		$	314		$	(25	)		(8.0	)%

(a) “Residential/Religious” generally includes single-family dwellings, individual apartments in multi-family dwellings, religious organizations and certain other not-for-profit organizations.

O&R’s electric operating revenues decreased $25 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to lower costs for purchased power ($35 million). O&R’s New York electric delivery revenues are subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which, delivery

55

revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved. O&R’s electric sales in New Jersey and Pennsylvania are not subject to a revenue decoupling mechanism, and as a result, changes in such volumes do impact revenues. Other electric operating revenues generally reflect changes in regulatory assets and liabilities in accordance with the company’s electric rate plan. See “Rate Agreements – O&R – Electric” in Note B to the Second Quarter Financial Statements and Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Electric delivery volumes in O&R’s service area increased 0.9 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for weather variations, electric delivery volumes in O&R’s service area increased 1.2 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period reflecting higher average normalized use per customer.

Electric operating income increased $3 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($10 million) and lower taxes, other than income taxes ($1 million, principally payroll taxes), offset by higher operations and maintenance costs ($7 million, due primarily to higher pension expense ($5 million)) and depreciation and amortization ($1 million).

Gas

O&R’s results of gas operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Six Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	130	$	125	$	5
Gas purchased for resale		53		58		(5	)
Net revenues		77		67		10
Operations and maintenance		34		33		1
Depreciation and amortization		7		6		1
Taxes, other than income taxes		8		7		1
Gas operating income	$	28	$	21	$	7

O&R’s gas sales and deliveries, excluding off-system sales, for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period were:

	Thousands of dths Delivered										Revenues in Millions
	Six Months Ended										Six Months Ended
Description	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation			June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation			Percent Variation
Residential		4,742		4,357		385			8.8	%	$	68	$	65	$	3			4.6	%
General		928		864		64			7.4			12		12		—			—
Firm transportation		6,952		6,052		900			14.9			45		37		8			21.6
Total firm sales and transportation		12,622		11,273		1,349			12.0			125		114		11			9.6
Interruptible sales		2,304		2,467		(163	)		(6.6	)		2		7		(5	)		(71.4	)
Generation plants		750		402		348			86.6			—		—		—			—
Other		534		476		58			12.2			—		—		—			—
Other gas revenues		—		—		—			—			3		4		(1	)		(25.0	)
Total		16,210		14,618		1,592			10.9	%	$	130	$	125	$	5			4.0	%

O&R’s gas operating revenues increased $5 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to the gas rate plan, offset in part by the decrease in gas purchased for resale ($5 million).

56

Sales and transportation volumes for firm customers increased 12.0 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. After adjusting for weather and other variations, total firm sales and transportation volumes increased 0.1 percent in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. O&R’s New York revenues from gas sales are subject to a weather normalization clause and a revenue decoupling mechanism, as a result of which delivery revenues are generally not affected by changes in delivery volumes from levels assumed when rates were approved.

Gas operating income increased $7 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period. The increase reflects primarily higher net revenues ($10 million), offset by higher operations and maintenance costs ($1 million), depreciation and amortization ($1 million) and taxes, other than income taxes ($1 million, principally state taxes).

Competitive Energy Businesses

The competitive energy business’s results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period is as follows:

	Six Months Ended
(Millions of Dollars)	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010		Variation
Operating revenues	$	814	$	906	$	(92	)
Purchased power		669		802		(133	)
Gas purchased for resale		11		6		5
Net revenues		134		98		36
Operations and maintenance		63		51		12
Depreciation and amortization		3		6		(3	)
Taxes, other than income taxes		10		8		2
Operating income	$	58	$	33	$	25

The competitive energy businesses’ operating revenues decreased $92 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to a decrease in electric revenues ($78 million) and net mark-to-market effects ($27 million), offset in part by an increase in other revenues ($13 million). Electric wholesale revenues decreased $64 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to lower sales volume ($57 million) and unit prices ($7 million). Electric retail revenues decreased $14 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due to lower unit prices ($26 million), offset by higher sales volume ($12 million). Gross margins on electric retail revenues decreased in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to lower unit gross margins. Net mark-to-market values increased $34 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the 2010 period, of which $61 million in gains are reflected in purchased power costs and $27 million in losses are reflected in revenues. Other revenues increased $13 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 as compared with the 2010 period due primarily to higher sales of energy efficiency services ($8 million).

Purchased power costs decreased $133 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to changes in mark-to-market values ($61 million) and lower purchased power costs ($73 million, due to lower unit prices ($37 million) and volumes ($36 million)). Operating income increased $25 million in the six months ended June 30, 2011 compared with the 2010 period due primarily to net mark-to-market effects ($34 million), offset by lower electric wholesale and retail gross margins ($9 million).

Other

For Con Edison, “Other” also includes inter-company eliminations relating to operating revenues and operating expenses.

57

Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

For information about the Companies’ primary market risks associated with activities in derivative financial instruments, other financial instruments and derivative commodity instruments, see “Financial and Commodity Market Risks,” in Part I, Item 2 of this report, which information is incorporated herein by reference. Also, see Item 7A of the Form 10-K.

Item 4: Controls and Procedures

The Companies maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that they submit to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. For each of the Companies, its management, with the participation of its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, has evaluated its disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report and, based on such evaluation, has concluded that the controls and procedures are effective to provide such reasonable assurance. Reasonable assurance is not absolute assurance, however, and there can be no assurance that any design of controls or procedures would be effective under all potential future conditions, regardless of how remote.

In January 2011, the Companies implemented a consolidation, reporting, and analysis system as part of a large ongoing project to implement a new financial and supply-chain enterprise resource planning information system. See Item 9A of the Form 10-K and Item 4 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q (which information is incorporated herein by reference). The project is reasonably likely to materially affect the Companies’ internal control over financial reporting.

There was no change in the Companies’ internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Companies’ most recent fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companies’ internal control over financial reporting.

58

Part II Other Information

Item 1: Legal Proceedings

For information about certain legal proceedings affecting the Companies, see Notes B, F and G to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of this report, which information is incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A: Risk Factors

There were no material changes in the Companies’ risk factors compared to those disclosed in Item 1A of the Form 10-K.

Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Period	Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased*		Average Price Paid per Share (or Unit)		Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs		Maximum Number (or Appropriate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
April 1, 2011 to April 30, 2011		—		—		—		—
May 1, 2011 to May 31, 2011		107,921	$	53.83		—		—
June 1, 2011 to June 30, 2011		71,021		52.40		—		—
Total		178,942	$	53.26		—		—

* Represents Con Edison common shares purchased in open-market transactions. The number of shares purchased approximated the number of treasury shares used for the company’s employee stock plans.

59

Item 6: Exhibits

CON EDISON

Exhibit 4.1	Amendment, dated as of June 22, 2011, to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement, dated as of June 22, 2006 among CECONY, Con Edison, O&R, the banks party thereto and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent.
Exhibit 12.1	Statement of computation of Con Edison’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the 12-month period ended December 31, 2010.
Exhibit 31.1.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 31.1.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 32.1.1	Section 1350 Certifications – Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 32.1.2	Section 1350 Certifications – Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
Exhibit 101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
Exhibit 101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

CECONY

Exhibit 12.2	Statement of computation of CECONY’s ratio of earnings to fixed charges for the six-month periods ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, and the 12-month period ended December 31, 2010.
Exhibit 31.2.1	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 31.2.2	Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications – Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 32.2.1	Section 1350 Certifications – Chief Executive Officer.
Exhibit 32.2.2	Section 1350 Certifications – Chief Financial Officer.
Exhibit 101.INS	XBRL Instance Document.
Exhibit 101.SCH	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.
Exhibit 101.CAL	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.DEF	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.LAB	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
Exhibit 101.PRE	XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

60

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, each Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.
	CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.
DATE: August 4, 2011	By	/S/    ROBERT HOGLUND
		Robert Hoglund Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Duly Authorized Officer

61

EX-4.1

Exhibit 4.1

AMENDMENT NO. 1

AMENDMENT dated as of June 22, 2011 to the Amended and Restated Credit Agreement dated as of June 22, 2006 (the “Credit Agreement”) among CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC., CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC., ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC., the BANKS party thereto and JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Administrative Agent.

The parties hereto agree as follows:

SECTION 1. Defined Terms; References. Unless otherwise specifically defined herein, each term used herein that is defined in the Credit Agreement has the meaning assigned to such term in the Credit Agreement. Each reference to “hereof”, “hereunder”, “herein” and “hereby” and each other similar reference and each reference to “this Agreement” and each other similar reference contained in the Credit Agreement shall, after this Amendment becomes effective, refer to the Credit Agreement as amended hereby.

SECTION 2. Amendments. (a) The definition of Letter of Credit Termination Date in Section 1.01 of the Credit Agreement is amended to read as follows:

“Letter of Credit Termination Date” means the first anniversary of the Termination Date (or if such date is not a Domestic Business Day, the next succeeding Domestic Business Day).

(b) The following new definition is added to Section 1.01 of the Credit Agreement:

“Long-Dated Letter of Credit” means any Letter of Credit having an expiry date later than the fifth Domestic Business Day prior to the Termination Date.

(c) Section 2.18 of the Credit Agreement is amended by the addition of the following new subsection (h):

(h) Cash Cover For Long-Dated Letters of Credit. Each Borrower shall on the fifth Domestic Business Day prior to the Termination Date pay to the Administrative Agent an amount in immediately available funds (which funds shall be held as collateral for the benefit of the Banks pursuant to arrangements satisfactory to the Administrative Agent) equal to the aggregate amount available for drawing under all of its respective Long-Dated Letters of Credit, if any; provided, however, that such payment shall not be required if and to the extent the Administrative Agent is holding funds as collateral pursuant to Section 6.03 with respect to such Long-Dated Letters of Credit. The Administrative Agent shall have exclusive dominion and control, including exclusive right of withdrawal, over the account in which such payment is deposited. Following the subsequent expiration, or surrender to the Issuing Bank, of any of a Borrower’s Long-Dated Letters of Credit, so long as no Event of Default then exists with respect to such Borrower, the Administrative Agent shall promptly return to such Borrower any funds the Administrative Agent is holding pursuant to this Section 2.18(h) for such Long-Dated Letter of Credit.

1

SECTION 3. Representations of Borrowers. Each Borrower represents and warrants that (i) the representations and warranties of such Borrower set forth in Article 4 of the Credit Agreement are true on the date hereof and (ii) no Default with respect to such Borrower has occurred and is continuing on the date hereof.

SECTION 4. Governing Law. This Amendment shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of New York.

SECTION 5. Counterparts. This Amendment may be signed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, with the same effect as if the signatures thereto and hereto were upon the same instrument.

SECTION 6. Effectiveness. This Amendment shall become effective as of the date hereof when the Administrative Agent shall have received from each of the Borrowers, the Banks, the Issuing Bank and the Administrative Agent a counterpart hereof signed by such party or facsimile or other written confirmation (in form satisfactory to the Administrative Agent) that such party has signed a counterpart hereof.

2

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to be duly executed as of the date first above written.

CONSOLIDATED EDISON COMPANY OF NEW YORK, INC.
By:	/s/ Scott Sanders
	Name: Scott Sanders
	Title: Vice President and Treasurer

CONSOLIDATED EDISON, INC.
By:	/s/ Scott Sanders
	Name: Scott Sanders
	Title: Vice President and Treasurer

ORANGE AND ROCKLAND UTILITIES, INC.
By:	/s/ John E. Perkins
	Name: John E. Perkins
	Title: Treasurer

3

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., as Bank, Issuing Bank and Administrative Agent
By:	/s/ Peter Christensen
	Name: Peter Christensen
	Title: Vice President

4

Bank: UBS Loan Finance LLC
By:	/s/ Mary E. Evans
	Name: Mary E. Evans
	Title: Associate Director
By:	/s/ Irja R. Otsa
	Name: Irja R. Otsa
	Title: Associate Director

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: TD Bank, N.A.
By:	/s/ Daniel Csillay
	Name: Daniel Csillay
	Title: Vice President

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: State Street Bank and Trust Company
By:	/s/ Mary H. Carey
	Name: Mary H. Carey
	Title: Vice President

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: The Royal Bank of Scotland PLC
By:	/s/ Tyler J. McCarthy
	Name: Tyler J. McCarthy
	Title: Director

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY
By:	/s/ Daniel J. Boote
	Name: Daniel J. Boote
	Title: Senior Vice President

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: Morgan Stanley Bank, N.A.
By:	/s/ Scott Taylor
	Name: Scott Taylor
	Title: Authorized Signatory

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: Mizuho Corporate Bank, Ltd.
By:	/s/ Raymond Ventura
	Name: Raymond Ventura
	Title: Deputy General Manager

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: KeyBank National Association
By:	/s/ Sherrie I. Manson
	Name: Sherrie I. Manson
	Title: Senior Vice President

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: HSBC Bank USA, N.A.
By:	/s/ Alexandra Barrows
	Name: Alexandra Barrows
	Title: Associate

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: Goldman Sachs Bank USA
By:	/s/ Lauren Day
	Name: Lauren Day
	Title: Authorized Signatory

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: William Street LLC
By:	/s/ Mark Walton
	Name: Mark Walton
	Title: Authorized Signatory

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: Commerzbank AG New York and Grand Cayman Branches
By:	/s/ Claudia Rost
	Name: Claudia Rost
	Title: Director
By:	/s/ Svenja Freckmann
	Name: Svenja Freckmann
	Title: Associate

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: Citibank, N.A.
By:	/s/ J. Nicholas McKee
	Name: J. Nicholas McKee
	Title: Managing Director

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd.
By:	/s/ Chi-Cheng Chen
	Name: Chi-Cheng Chen
	Title: Vice President

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: The Bank of New York Mellon
By:	/s/ John Watt
	Name: John Watt
	Title: Vice President

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: Barclays Bank PLC
By:	/s/ May Huang
	Name: May Huang
	Title: Assistant Vice President

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: Bank of America, N.A.
By:	/s/ Mike Mason
	Name: Mike Mason
	Title: Director

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

Bank: Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
By:	/s/ Keith Luettel
	Name: Keith Luettel
	Title: Vice President

[Amendment to the Credit Agreement]

EX-12.1

Exhibit 12.1

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Millions of Dollars)

	For the Six Months  Ended June 30, 2011		For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2010		For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Earnings
Net income from continuing operations	$	477	$	992	$	409
Preferred stock dividend		6		11		6
(Income) or loss from equity investees		—		2		(1	)
Minority interest loss		—		—		—
Income tax		252		548		228
Pre-tax income from continuing operations	$	735	$	1,553	$	642
Add: Fixed charges*		328		660		324
Add: Distributed income of equity investees		—		—		—
Subtract: Interest capitalized		—		—		—
Subtract: Pre-tax preferred stock dividend requirement		9		19		9
Earnings	$	1,054	$	2,194	$	957
* Fixed charges
Interest on long-term debt	$	282	$	580	$	290
Amortization of debt discount, premium and expense		11		17		8
Interest capitalized		—		—		—
Other interest		14		21		6
Interest component of rentals		12		23		11
Pre-tax preferred stock dividend requirement		9		19		9
Fixed charges	$	328	$	660	$	324
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges		3.2		3.3		3.0

EX-31.1.1

Exhibit 31.1.1

CERTIFICATIONS

CON EDISON—Principal Executive Officer

I, Kevin Burke, the principal executive officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 of Consolidated Edison, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 4, 2011

/s/ Kevin Burke

Kevin Burke

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.1.2

Exhibit 31.1.2

CERTIFICATIONS

CON EDISON—Principal Financial Officer

I, Robert Hoglund, the principal financial officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 of Consolidated Edison, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 4, 2011

/s/ Robert Hoglund

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

EX-32.1.1

Exhibit 32.1.1

Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kevin Burke

Kevin Burke

Dated: August 4, 2011

EX-32.1.2

Exhibit 32.1.2

Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Hoglund

Robert Hoglund

Dated: August 4, 2011

EX-12.2

Exhibit 12.2

Con Edison Company of New York, Inc.

Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges

(Millions of Dollars)

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011		For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2010		For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
Earnings
Net income for common stock	$	426	$	893	$	378
Preferred stock dividend		6		11		6
(Income) or loss from equity investees		—		2		—
Minority interest loss		—		—		(1	)
Income tax		220		495		207
Pre-tax income for common stock	$	652	$	1,401	$	590
Add: Fixed charges*		284		578		287
Add: Distributed income of equity investees		—		—		—
Subtract: Interest capitalized		—		—		—
Subtract: Pre-tax preferred stock dividend requirement		—		—		—
Earnings	$	936	$	1,979	$	877
* Fixed charges
Interest on long-term debt	$	253	$	520	$	261
Amortization of debt discount, premium and expense		10		17		8
Interest capitalized		—		—		—
Other interest		10		19		8
Interest component of rentals		11		22		10
Pre-tax preferred stock dividend requirement		—		—		—
Fixed charges	$	284	$	578	$	287
Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges		3.3		3.4		3.1

EX-31.2.1

Exhibit 31.2.1

CERTIFICATIONS

CECONY—Principal Executive Officer

I, Kevin Burke, the principal executive officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 4, 2011

/s/ Kevin Burke

Kevin Burke

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2.2

Exhibit 31.2.2

CERTIFICATIONS

CECONY—Principal Financial Officer

I, Robert Hoglund, the principal financial officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., certify that:

1. I have reviewed this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011 of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: August 4, 2011

/s/ Robert Hoglund

Robert Hoglund

Senior Vice President and Chief

Financial Officer

EX-32.2.1

Exhibit 32.2.1

Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Kevin Burke, the Chief Executive Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Kevin Burke

Kevin Burke

Dated: August 4, 2011

EX-32.2.2

Exhibit 32.2.2

Certification Required Under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

I, Robert Hoglund, the Chief Financial Officer of Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. (the “Company”) certify that the Company’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011, which this statement accompanies, (the “Form 10-Q”) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78m or 78o(d)) and that the information contained in the Form 10-Q fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Company.

/s/ Robert Hoglund

Robert Hoglund

Dated: August 4, 2011

XML



Fair Value Measurements (Reconciliation Of The Beginning And Ending Net Balances For Assets And Liabilities Measured At Level 3 Fair Value) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended				6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011		Jun. 30, 2010		Jun. 30, 2011		Jun. 30, 2010
Beginning Balance	$ 64		$ (86)		$ 3		$ 22
Included in Earnings	(14)		8		3		(36)
Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities	14		33		47		(39)
Purchases	5		3		14		3
Sales	(2)		(2)		(4)		(3)
Settlements	4		7		3		16
Transfers In/Out of Level 3			18		5		18
Ending Balance	71		(19)		71		(19)
Commodity [Member]
Beginning Balance	(31)		(168)		(88)		(59)
Included in Earnings	(14)		9		2		(34)
Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities	14		33		45		(40)
Purchases	5		3		14		3
Sales	(2)		(2)		(4)		(3)
Settlements	3		6		1		14
Transfers In/Out of Level 3			18		5		18
Ending Balance	(25)		(101)		(25)		(101)
Fair Value Interest Rate Contract [Member]
Beginning Balance	(10)		(11)		(10)		(11)
Included in Earnings	(1)		(1)		(2)		(2)
Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities			(1)				(1)
Settlements	1		1		2		2
Transfers In/Out of Level 3
Ending Balance	(10)		(12)		(10)		(12)
Fair Value Other Assets [Member]
Beginning Balance	105	[1]	93	[1]	101	[1]	92	[1]
Included in Earnings	1	[1]		[1]	3	[1]		[1]
Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities		[1]	1	[1]	2	[1]	2	[1]
Transfers In/Out of Level 3		[1]		[1]		[1]		[1]
Ending Balance	$ 106	[1]	$ 94	[1]	$ 106	[1]	$ 94	[1]

[1] Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

XML



Consolidated Statement Of Cash Flows (USD $) In Millions	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income	$ 483	$ 415
PRINCIPAL NON-CASH CHARGES/(CREDITS) TO INCOME
Depreciation and amortization	437	415
Deferred income taxes	181	46
Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction	(6)	(9)
Net derivative (gains)/losses	(35)	(2)
Other non-cash items (net)	(9)	41
CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Accounts receivable - customers, less allowance for uncollectibles	72	(28)
Materials and supplies, including fuel oil and gas in storage	38	27
Other receivables and other current assets	69	79
Prepayments	194
Accounts payable	(76)	(79)
Pensions and retiree benefits	(72)	49
Accrued taxes	66	(7)
Accrued interest		(3)
Deferred charges, deferred derivative losses, noncurrent assets and other regulatory assets	125	(319)
Deferred credits and other regulatory liabilities	140	111
Other assets		(7)
Other liabilities	(18)	66
NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	1,589	795
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Utility construction expenditures	(958)	(946)
Cost of removal less salvage	(81)	(66)
Non-utility construction expenditures	(50)	(4)
Proceeds from investment tax credits and grants related to renewable energy investments	4
Loan to Pilesgrove solar project	(50)
Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction	6	9
NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	(1,129)	(1,007)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from short-term debt		153
Retirement of long-term debt	(3)	(426)
Issuance of long-term debt		700
Issuance of common stock	58	25
Repurchase of common stock	(9)
Debt issuance costs		(5)
Common stock dividends	(346)	(311)
Preferred stock dividends	(6)	(6)
NET CASH FLOWS (USED IN)/FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES	(306)	130
CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS:
NET CHANGE FOR THE PERIOD	154	(82)
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD	338	260
BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD	492	178
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest	282	295
Income taxes	(155)	157
CECONY [Member]
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net Income	432	384
PRINCIPAL NON-CASH CHARGES/(CREDITS) TO INCOME
Depreciation and amortization	410	388
Deferred income taxes	146	56
Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction	(5)	(8)
Other non-cash items (net)	66	16
CHANGES IN ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
Accounts receivable - customers, less allowance for uncollectibles	74	(21)
Materials and supplies, including fuel oil and gas in storage	36	14
Other receivables and other current assets	207	58
Prepayments	9	2
Accounts payable	(56)	(75)
Pensions and retiree benefits	(109)	22
Accrued taxes	21	2
Accrued interest		(4)
Deferred charges, deferred derivative losses, noncurrent assets and other regulatory assets	65	(271)
Deferred credits and other regulatory liabilities	138	97
Other liabilities	(9)	77
NET CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES	1,425	737
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Utility construction expenditures	(910)	(895)
Cost of removal less salvage	(78)	(65)
Common equity component of allowance for funds used during construction	5	8
NET CASH FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES	(983)	(952)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net proceeds from short-term debt		66
Retirement of long-term debt		(325)
Issuance of long-term debt		700
Debt issuance costs		(5)
Capital contribution by parent		24
Common stock dividends	(340)	(335)
Preferred stock dividends	(6)	(6)
NET CASH FLOWS (USED IN)/FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES	(346)	119
CASH AND TEMPORARY CASH INVESTMENTS:
NET CHANGE FOR THE PERIOD	96	(96)
BALANCE AT BEGINNING OF PERIOD	78	131
BALANCE AT END OF PERIOD	174	35
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURE OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Interest	253	265
Income taxes	$ (128)	$ 137

XML



Consolidated Balance Sheet (USD $) In Millions	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and temporary cash investments	$ 492	$ 338
Accounts receivable - customers, less allowance for uncollectible accounts	1,101	1,173
Accrued unbilled revenue	515	633
Other receivables, less allowance for uncollectible accounts	254	261
Loan receivable from Pilesgrove solar project	84	32
Fuel oil, gas in storage, materials and supplies, at average cost	310	348
Prepayments	147	341
Regulatory assets	130	203
Other current assets	176	178
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS	3,209	3,507
INVESTMENTS	426	403
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
General	1,917	1,911
TOTAL	28,875	28,144
Less: Accumulated depreciation	5,870	5,808
Net	23,005	22,336
Construction work in progress	1,299	1,458
NET UTILITY PLANT	24,304	23,794
NON-UTILITY PLANT
Non-utility property, less accumulated depreciation	56	46
Construction work in progress	54	23
NET PLANT	24,414	23,863
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
Goodwill	429	429
Intangible assets, less accumulated amortization of $3 in 2011 and 2010	3	3
Regulatory assets	7,261	7,683
Other deferred charges and noncurrent assets	277	298
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS	7,970	8,413
TOTAL ASSETS	36,019	36,186
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Long-term debt due within one year	5	5
Accounts payable	1,033	1,151
Customer deposits	299	289
Accrued taxes	156	90
Accrued interest	155	155
Accrued wages	94	102
Fair value of derivative liabilities	109	125
Other current liabilities	622	703
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES	2,473	2,620
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Obligations under capital leases	4	7
Provision for injuries and damages	182	165
Pensions and retiree benefits	2,666	3,287
Superfund and other environmental costs	502	512
Asset retirement obligations	112	109
Fair value of derivative liabilities	35	77
Other noncurrent liabilities	124	126
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES	3,625	4,283
DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits	6,853	6,602
Regulatory liabilities	866	690
Other deferred credits	69	46
TOTAL DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES	7,788	7,338
LONG-TERM DEBT	10,669	10,671
SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Common shareholders' equity (See Statement of Shareholders' Equity)	11,251	11,061
Preferred stock of subsidiary	213	213
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY	11,464	11,274
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY	36,019	36,186
CECONY [Member] | Steam Plant [Member]
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
Utility plant, at original cost	1,946	2,038
Steam Plant [Member]
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
Utility plant, at original cost	1,946	2,038
CECONY [Member] | Electric Transmission [Member]
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
Utility plant, at original cost	19,311	18,735
Electric Transmission [Member]
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
Utility plant, at original cost	20,506	19,851
CECONY [Member] | Gas Transmission [Member]
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
Utility plant, at original cost	3,999	3,844
Gas Transmission [Member]
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
Utility plant, at original cost	4,506	4,344
CECONY [Member]
CURRENT ASSETS
Cash and temporary cash investments	174	78
Accounts receivable - customers, less allowance for uncollectible accounts	951	1,025
Accrued unbilled revenue	388	473
Other receivables, less allowance for uncollectible accounts	88	73
Loan receivable from Pilesgrove solar project	60	273
Fuel oil, gas in storage, materials and supplies, at average cost	270	306
Prepayments	73	82
Regulatory assets	98	151
Other current assets	91	104
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS	2,193	2,565
INVESTMENTS	190	167
UTILITY PLANT, AT ORIGINAL COST
General	1,747	1,746
TOTAL	27,003	26,363
Less: Accumulated depreciation	5,360	5,314
Net	21,643	21,049
Construction work in progress	1,232	1,345
NET UTILITY PLANT	22,875	22,394
NON-UTILITY PLANT
Non-utility property, less accumulated depreciation	7	7
NET PLANT	22,882	22,401
OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS
Regulatory assets	6,727	7,097
Other deferred charges and noncurrent assets	234	244
TOTAL OTHER NONCURRENT ASSETS	6,961	7,341
TOTAL ASSETS	32,226	32,474
CURRENT LIABILITIES
Accounts payable	820	924
Accounts payable to affiliated companies	17	13
Customer deposits	285	276
Accrued taxes	59	34
Accrued taxes to affiliated companies	25	29
Accrued interest	130	130
Accrued wages	89	93
Other current liabilities	590	686
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES	2,015	2,185
NONCURRENT LIABILITIES
Obligations under capital leases	4	7
Provision for injuries and damages	175	159
Pensions and retiree benefits	2,283	2,900
Superfund and other environmental costs	384	392
Asset retirement obligations	112	109
Fair value of derivative liabilities	13	29
Other noncurrent liabilities	117	116
TOTAL NONCURRENT LIABILITIES	3,088	3,712
DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits	6,342	6,071
Regulatory liabilities	751	585
Other deferred credits	65	42
TOTAL DEFERRED CREDITS AND REGULATORY LIABILITIES	7,158	6,698
LONG-TERM DEBT	9,744	9,743
SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY
Common shareholders' equity (See Statement of Shareholders' Equity)	10,008	9,923
Preferred stock of subsidiary	213	213
TOTAL SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY	10,221	10,136
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDER'S EQUITY	$ 32,226	$ 32,474

XML



Regulatory Matters (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Regulatory Matters

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Regulatory assets
Unrecognized pension and other postretirement costs	$	3,921	$	4,371	$	3,728	$	4,152
Future federal income tax		1,730		1,593		1,659		1,515
Environmental remediation costs		684		695		566		574
Pension and other post retirement benefits deferrals		183		138		140		90
Revenue taxes		155		145		150		140
Net electric deferrals		130		156		129		156
Surcharge for New York State Assessment		98		121		91		112
Deferred storm costs		53		57		41		43
O&R transition bond charges		47		48		—		—
Deferred derivative losses – long-term		44		74		28		48
Property tax reconciliation		31		34		19		27
Workers' compensation		28		31		28		31
World Trade Center restoration costs		13		45		13		45
Recoverable energy		—		42		—		42
Other		144		133		135		122
Regulatory assets – long-term		7,261		7,683		6,727		7,097
Deferred derivative losses – current		121		190		98		151
Recoverable energy costs – current		9		13		—		—
Regulatory assets – current		130		203		98		151
Total Regulatory Assets	$	7,391	$	7,886	$	6,825	$	7,248
Regulatory liabilities
Allowance for cost of removal less salvage	$	430	$	422	$	356	$	350
Revenue decoupling mechanism		81		38		81		38
World Trade Center settlement proceeds		62		—		62		—
Carrying charges on T&D net plant		40		28		11		5
Energy efficiency programs		28		19		27		18
New York State tax refund		20		30		20		30
Gain on sale of properties		15		31		15		31
Bonus depreciation		13		1		12		1
Expenditure prudence proceeding		11		—		11		—
Other		166		121		156		112
Regulatory liabilities		866		690		751		585
Net unbilled revenue deferrals – current		117		136		117		136
Refundable energy cost – current		75		117		50		90
Deferred derivative gains – current		6		4		4		3
Regulatory liabilities – current		198		257		171		229
Total Regulatory Liabilities	$	1,064	$	947	$	922	$	814

XML



Document And Entity Information	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jul. 29, 2011
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2011
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Trading Symbol	ED
Entity Registrant Name	CONSOLIDATED EDISON INC
Entity Central Index Key	0001047862
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Large Accelerated Filer
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding		292,875,896
Consolidated Edison Co Of New York Inc [Member]
Entity Registrant Name	CONSOLIDATED EDISON CO OF NEW YORK INC
Entity Central Index Key	0000023632
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer

XML



Fair Value Measurements (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Fair Value Measurements
Gain (loss) on Level 3 energy derivative assets	$ (4)		$ (3)
Gains (loss) on Level 3 energy derivative liabilities		(27)		33
Loss on Level 3 energy derivative assets for purchased power costs	1		21
Gain on Level 3 energy derivative liabilities for purchased power costs		49		(40)
Fair value, assets measured on recurring basis, change in unrealized gain (loss) included in other income	(13)	(45)	(25)	1
Fair value, assets measured on recurring basis, change in unrealized gain (loss) included in purchased power costs	$ 6	$ 64	$ 36	$ (7)

XML



Environmental Matters (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Environmental Matters

Accrued Liabilities And Regulatory Assets

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Accrued Liabilities:
Manufactured gas plant sites	$	434	$	446	$	317	$	327
Other Superfund Sites		68		66		67		65
Total	$	502	$	512	$	384	$	392
Regulatory assets	$	683	$	692	$	564	$	571

Environmental Remediation Costs

For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Remediation costs incurred	$	10	$	14	$	8	$	13

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Remediation costs incurred	$	16	$	23	$	14	$	21

Accrued Liabilities For Asbestos Suits And Workers' Compensation Proceedings

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Accrued liability – asbestos suits	$	10	$	10	$	10	$	10
Regulatory assets – asbestos suits	$	10	$	10	$	10	$	10
Accrued liability – workers' compensation	$	103	$	106	$	98	$	101
Regulatory assets – workers' compensation	$	28	$	31	$	28	$	31

XML



Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities (Aggregate Fair Value Of All Derivative Instruments With Credit Risk Related Contingent Features) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	Jun. 30, 2011
Aggregate fair value - net liabilities	$ 140	[1]
Collateral posted	40	[1]
Additional Collateral Required Due to Loss of Unsecured Credit [Member]
Collateral posted	161
Additional Collateral Aggregate Fair Value Down One Level [Member]
Additional collateral	29	[1],[2],[3]
Additional Collateral Aggregate Fair Value Down Below Investment Grade [Member]
Collateral posted	24
Additional collateral	$ 149	[1],[2],[3],[4]

[1] Non-derivative transactions for the purchase and sale of electricity and gas and qualifying derivative instruments, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales, are excluded from the table. These transactions primarily include purchases of electricity from independent system operators. In the event the Utilities and Con Edison's competitive energy businesses were no longer extended unsecured credit for such purchases, the Companies would be required to post collateral, which at June 30, 2011, would have amounted to an estimated $161 million for Con Edison, including $52 million for CECONY. For certain other such non-derivative transactions, the Companies could be required to post collateral under certain circumstances, including in the event counterparties had reasonable grounds for insecurity.

[2] The Companies measure the collateral requirements by taking into consideration the fair value amounts of derivative instruments that contain credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liabilities position plus amounts owed to counterparties for settled transactions and amounts required by counterparties for minimum financial security. The fair value amounts represent unrealized losses, net of any unrealized gains where the Companies have a legally enforceable right of setoff.

[3] The current ratings are Moody's, S&P and Fitch long-term credit rating of, as applicable, Con Edison (Baa1/BBB+/BBB+), CECONY (A3/A-/A-) or O&R (Baa1/A-/A-). Credit ratings assigned by rating agencies are expressions of opinions that are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency.

[4] Derivative instruments that are net assets have been excluded from the table. At June 30, 2011, if Con Edison had been downgraded to below investment grade, it would have been required to post additional collateral for such derivative instruments of an estimated $24 million.

XML



Short-Term Borrowing

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Short-Term Borrowing

Note C — Short-Term Borrowing

Reference is made to Note D to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note C to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 Con Edison and CECONY had no commercial paper outstanding.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no loans were outstanding under the Companies' Credit Agreement and $188 million (including $135 million for CECONY) and $197 million (including $145 million for CECONY) of letters of credit were outstanding under the Credit Agreement, respectively.

CECONY [Member]

Short-Term Borrowing

Note C — Short-Term Borrowing

Reference is made to Note D to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note C to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 Con Edison and CECONY had no commercial paper outstanding.

At June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, no loans were outstanding under the Companies' Credit Agreement and $188 million (including $135 million for CECONY) and $197 million (including $145 million for CECONY) of letters of credit were outstanding under the Credit Agreement, respectively.

XML



Other Material Contingencies (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Other Material Contingencies

Total Guarantees

Guarantee Type	0 – 3 years		4 – 10 years		> 10 years		Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Commodity transactions	$	616		8		140	$	764
Intra-company guarantees		15		—		1		16
Other guarantees		40		14		—		54
TOTAL	$	671	$	22	$	141	$	834

XML



Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities (Energy Price Hedging Fair Values) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - gross	$ (121)	$ (261)
Impact of netting of cash collateral	100	176
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - net	$ (21)	$ (85)

XML



Environmental Matters (Accrued Liability For Asbestos Suits And Workers' Compensation Proceedings) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Regulatory assets	$ 7,391	$ 7,886
Asbestos Suits [Member]
Accrued liability	10	10
Regulatory assets	10	10
Workers' Compensation [Member]
Accrued liability	103	106
Regulatory assets	$ 28	$ 31

XML



Other Postretirement Benefits (Tables) (Other Postretirement Benefits [Member])

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Other Postretirement Benefits [Member]

Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Costs

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	6		$	6		$	5		$	5
Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation		21			23			18			20
Expected return on plan assets		(22	)		(22	)		(19	)		(19	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		22			23			20			21
Amortization of prior service cost		(2	)		(3	)		(3	)		(4	)
Amortization of transition obligation		1			1			1			1
NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST	$	26		$	28		$	22		$	24
Cost capitalized		(9	)		(10	)		(8	)		(8	)
Cost deferred		4			1			4			—
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	21		$	19		$	18		$	16

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	12		$	12		$	10		$	10
Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation		42			46			36			40
Expected return on plan assets		(44	)		(44	)		(38	)		(38	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		44			46			40			42
Amortization of prior service cost		(4	)		(6	)		(6	)		(8	)
Amortization of transition obligation		2			2			2			2
NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST	$	52		$	56		$	44		$	48
Cost capitalized		(18	)		(20	)		(15	)		(17	)
Cost deferred		9			—			7			(2	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	43		$	36		$	36		$	29

XML



Financial Information By Business Segment

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Financial Information By Business Segment

Note H — Financial Information by Business Segment

Reference is made to Note N to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

The financial data for the business segments are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Operating revenues						Inter-segment revenues						Depreciation and amortization				Operating income
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
CECONY
Electric	$	2,013		$	2,104		$	3		$	2		$	162	$	156	$	350		$	319
Gas		296			239			1			1			27		25		31			44
Steam		107			89			20			18			16		15		(11	)		(29	)
Consolidation adjustments		—			—			(24	)		(21	)		—		—		—			—
Total CECONY	$	2,416		$	2,432		$	—		$	—		$	205	$	196	$	370		$	334
O&R
Electric	$	141		$	153		$	—		$	—		$	8	$	8	$	14		$	15
Gas		37			35			—			—			4		3		1			(1	)
Total O&R	$	178		$	188		$	—		$	—		$	12	$	11	$	15		$	14
Competitive energy businesses	$	406		$	406		$	2		$	2		$	2	$	4	$	14		$	81
Other*		(7	)		(9	)		(2	)		(2	)		—		—		(1	)		—
Total Con Edison	$	2,993		$	3,017		$	—		$	—		$	219	$	211	$	398		$	429

* Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Operating revenues						Inter-segment revenues						Depreciation and amortization				Operating income
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
CECONY
Electric	$	3,734		$	3,832		$	6		$	6		$	324	$	307	$	566		$	514
Gas		959			922			2			2			54		50		237			259
Steam		432			396			40			36			32		31		114			73
Consolidation adjustments		—			—			(48	)		(44	)		—		—		—			—
Total CECONY	$	5,125		$	5,150		$	—		$	—		$	410	$	388	$	917		$	846
O&R
Electric	$	289		$	314		$	—		$	—		$	17	$	16	$	25		$	22
Gas		130			125			—			—			7		6		28			21
Total O&R	$	419		$	439		$	—		$	—		$	24	$	22	$	53		$	43
Competitive energy businesses	$	814		$	906		$	5		$	4		$	3	$	5	$	58		$	33
Other*		(16	)		(17	)		(5	)		(4	)		—		—		(4	)		(1	)
Total Con Edison	$	6,342		$	6,478		$	—		$	—		$	437	$	415	$	1,024		$	921

* Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

CECONY [Member]

Financial Information By Business Segment

Note H — Financial Information by Business Segment

Reference is made to Note N to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

The financial data for the business segments are as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Operating revenues						Inter-segment revenues						Depreciation and amortization				Operating income
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
CECONY
Electric	$	2,013		$	2,104		$	3		$	2		$	162	$	156	$	350		$	319
Gas		296			239			1			1			27		25		31			44
Steam		107			89			20			18			16		15		(11	)		(29	)
Consolidation adjustments		—			—			(24	)		(21	)		—		—		—			—
Total CECONY	$	2,416		$	2,432		$	—		$	—		$	205	$	196	$	370		$	334
O&R
Electric	$	141		$	153		$	—		$	—		$	8	$	8	$	14		$	15
Gas		37			35			—			—			4		3		1			(1	)
Total O&R	$	178		$	188		$	—		$	—		$	12	$	11	$	15		$	14
Competitive energy businesses	$	406		$	406		$	2		$	2		$	2	$	4	$	14		$	81
Other*		(7	)		(9	)		(2	)		(2	)		—		—		(1	)		—
Total Con Edison	$	2,993		$	3,017		$	—		$	—		$	219	$	211	$	398		$	429

* Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Operating revenues						Inter-segment revenues						Depreciation and amortization				Operating income
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
CECONY
Electric	$	3,734		$	3,832		$	6		$	6		$	324	$	307	$	566		$	514
Gas		959			922			2			2			54		50		237			259
Steam		432			396			40			36			32		31		114			73
Consolidation adjustments		—			—			(48	)		(44	)		—		—		—			—
Total CECONY	$	5,125		$	5,150		$	—		$	—		$	410	$	388	$	917		$	846
O&R
Electric	$	289		$	314		$	—		$	—		$	17	$	16	$	25		$	22
Gas		130			125			—			—			7		6		28			21
Total O&R	$	419		$	439		$	—		$	—		$	24	$	22	$	53		$	43
Competitive energy businesses	$	814		$	906		$	5		$	4		$	3	$	5	$	58		$	33
Other*		(16	)		(17	)		(5	)		(4	)		—		—		(4	)		(1	)
Total Con Edison	$	6,342		$	6,478		$	—		$	—		$	437	$	415	$	1,024		$	921

* Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

XML



Consolidated Statement Of Common Shareholders' Equity (USD $) In Millions, except Share data	CECONY [Member] Common Stock [Member]	CECONY [Member] Additional Paid- In Capital [Member]	CECONY [Member] Retained Earnings [Member]	CECONY [Member] Repurchased Con Edison Stock [Member]	CECONY [Member] Capital Stock Expense [Member]	CECONY [Member] Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) [Member]	CECONY [Member]	Common Stock [Member]	Additional Paid- In Capital [Member]	Retained Earnings [Member]	Treasury Stock [Member]	Capital Stock Expense [Member]	Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) [Member]	Total
BEGINNING BALANCE at Dec. 31, 2009	$ 589	$ 3,877	$ 5,909	$ (962)	$ (62)	$ (4)	$ 9,347	$ 30	$ 4,420	$ 6,904	$ (1,001)	$ (62)	$ (42)	$ 10,249
BEGINNING BALANCE (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2009	235,488,094							281,123,741			23,210,700
Net Income			246				246
Capital contribution from parent		12					12
Net income for common stock										226				226
Common stock dividends			(167)				(167)			(167)				(167)
Cumulative preferred dividends			(3)				(3)
Issuance of common shares-dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans (in shares)								647,731
Issuance of common shares-dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans									28					28
Other comprehensive income													3	3
ENDING BALANCE at Mar. 31, 2010	589	3,889	5,985	(962)	(62)	(4)	9,435	30	4,448	6,963	(1,001)	(62)	(39)	10,339
ENDING BALANCE (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2010	235,488,094							281,771,472			23,210,700
BEGINNING BALANCE at Dec. 31, 2009	589			(962)	(62)	(4)	9,347				(1,001)	(62)		10,249
BEGINNING BALANCE (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2009	235,488,094										23,210,700
Net Income							384							415
Net income for common stock							378							409
Cumulative preferred dividends							(6)							(6)
ENDING BALANCE at Jun. 30, 2010	589			(962)	(62)	(4)	9,414				(1,001)	(62)		10,380
ENDING BALANCE (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2010	235,488,094										23,210,700
BEGINNING BALANCE at Mar. 31, 2010	589	3,889	5,985	(962)	(62)	(4)	9,435	30	4,448	6,963	(1,001)	(62)	(39)	10,339
BEGINNING BALANCE (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2010	235,488,094							281,771,472			23,210,700
Net Income			138				138							186
Capital contribution from parent		12					12
Net income for common stock							135			183				183
Common stock dividends			(168)				(168)			(168)				(168)
Cumulative preferred dividends			(3)				(3)							(3)
Issuance of common shares-dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans (in shares)								555,964
Issuance of common shares-dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans									25					25
Other comprehensive income													1	1
ENDING BALANCE at Jun. 30, 2010	589	3,901	5,952	(962)	(62)	(4)	9,414	30	4,473	6,978	(1,001)	(62)	(38)	10,380
ENDING BALANCE (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2010	235,488,094							282,327,436			23,210,700
BEGINNING BALANCE at Dec. 31, 2010	589	4,234	6,132	(962)	(64)	(6)	9,923	31	4,915	7,220	(1,001)	(64)	(40)	11,061
BEGINNING BALANCE (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2010	235,488,094							291,616,334			23,210,700
Net Income			271				271
Net income for common stock										311				311
Common stock dividends			(170)				(170)			(175)				(175)
Cumulative preferred dividends			(3)				(3)
Issuance of common shares-dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans (in shares)								656,049
Issuance of common shares-dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans								1	30					31
Other comprehensive income													3	3
ENDING BALANCE at Mar. 31, 2011	589	4,234	6,230	(962)	(64)	(6)	10,021	32	4,945	7,356		(64)	(37)	11,231
ENDING BALANCE (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2011	235,488,094							292,272,383
BEGINNING BALANCE at Dec. 31, 2010	589	4,234		(962)	(64)	(6)	9,923				(1,001)	(64)		11,061
BEGINNING BALANCE (in shares) at Dec. 31, 2010	235,488,094										23,210,700
Net Income							432							483
Net income for common stock							426							477
Cumulative preferred dividends							(6)							(6)
ENDING BALANCE at Jun. 30, 2011	589	4,234		(962)	(64)	(6)	10,008					(64)		11,251
ENDING BALANCE (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2011	235,488,094
BEGINNING BALANCE at Mar. 31, 2011	589	4,234	6,230	(962)	(64)	(6)	10,021	32	4,945	7,356	(1,001)	(64)	(37)	11,231
BEGINNING BALANCE (in shares) at Mar. 31, 2011	235,488,094							292,272,383			23,210,700
Net Income			160				160							168
Net income for common stock							157			165				165
Common stock dividends			(170)				(170)			(175)				(175)
Cumulative preferred dividends			(3)				(3)							(3)
Issuance of common shares-dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans (in shares)								603,513			(182,942)
Issuance of common shares-dividend reinvestment and employee stock plans									32		5			37
Common stock repurchases											(9)			(9)
Common stock repurchases, shares											178,942
Other comprehensive income													2	2
ENDING BALANCE at Jun. 30, 2011	$ 589	$ 4,234	$ 6,217	$ (962)	$ (64)	$ (6)	$ 10,008	$ 32	$ 4,977	$ 7,346	$ (1,005)	$ (64)	$ (35)	$ 11,251
ENDING BALANCE (in shares) at Jun. 30, 2011	235,488,094							292,875,896			23,206,700

XML



Other Postretirement Benefits (Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Costs) (Details) (Other Postretirement Benefits [Member], USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Mar. 31, 2011
Other Postretirement Benefits [Member]
Service cost	$ 6	$ 6	$ 12	$ 12
Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation	21	23	42	46
Expected return on plan assets	(22)	(22)	(44)	(44)
Amortization of net actuarial loss	22	23	44	46
Amortization of prior service cost	(2)	(3)	(4)	(6)
Amortization of transition obligation	1	1	2	2
NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST	26	28	52	56
Cost capitalized	(9)	(10)	(18)	(20)
Cost deferred	4	1	9
Cost charged to operating expenses	21	19	43	36
Expected contributions					$ 84

XML



Other Postretirement Benefits

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Other Postretirement Benefits

Note E — Other Postretirement Benefits

Reference is made to Note F to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note E to the financial statement in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the Companies' net periodic postretirement benefit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	6		$	6		$	5		$	5
Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation		21			23			18			20
Expected return on plan assets		(22	)		(22	)		(19	)		(19	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		22			23			20			21
Amortization of prior service cost		(2	)		(3	)		(3	)		(4	)
Amortization of transition obligation		1			1			1			1
NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST	$	26		$	28		$	22		$	24
Cost capitalized		(9	)		(10	)		(8	)		(8	)
Cost deferred		4			1			4			—
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	21		$	19		$	18		$	16

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	12		$	12		$	10		$	10
Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation		42			46			36			40
Expected return on plan assets		(44	)		(44	)		(38	)		(38	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		44			46			40			42
Amortization of prior service cost		(4	)		(6	)		(6	)		(8	)
Amortization of transition obligation		2			2			2			2
NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST	$	52		$	56		$	44		$	48
Cost capitalized		(18	)		(20	)		(15	)		(17	)
Cost deferred		9			—			7			(2	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	43		$	36		$	36		$	29

Expected Contributions

Based on estimates as of March 31, 2011, Con Edison expects to make a contribution of $84 million, including $74 million for CECONY, to the other postretirement benefit plans in 2011.

CECONY [Member]

Other Postretirement Benefits

Note E — Other Postretirement Benefits

Reference is made to Note F to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note E to the financial statement in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the Companies' net periodic postretirement benefit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	6		$	6		$	5		$	5
Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation		21			23			18			20
Expected return on plan assets		(22	)		(22	)		(19	)		(19	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		22			23			20			21
Amortization of prior service cost		(2	)		(3	)		(3	)		(4	)
Amortization of transition obligation		1			1			1			1
NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST	$	26		$	28		$	22		$	24
Cost capitalized		(9	)		(10	)		(8	)		(8	)
Cost deferred		4			1			4			—
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	21		$	19		$	18		$	16

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost	$	12		$	12		$	10		$	10
Interest cost on accumulated other postretirement benefit obligation		42			46			36			40
Expected return on plan assets		(44	)		(44	)		(38	)		(38	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		44			46			40			42
Amortization of prior service cost		(4	)		(6	)		(6	)		(8	)
Amortization of transition obligation		2			2			2			2
NET PERIODIC POSTRETIREMENT BENEFIT COST	$	52		$	56		$	44		$	48
Cost capitalized		(18	)		(20	)		(15	)		(17	)
Cost deferred		9			—			7			(2	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	43		$	36		$	36		$	29

Expected Contributions

Based on estimates as of March 31, 2011, Con Edison expects to make a contribution of $84 million, including $74 million for CECONY, to the other postretirement benefit plans in 2011.

XML



Fair Value Measurements

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Fair Value Measurements

Note J — Fair Value Measurements

Reference is made to Note P to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 are summarized below.

	Level 1				Level 2				Level 3						Netting Adjustments(4)						Total
(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative assets:
Commodity(1)	$	1	$	—	$	56	$	24	$	100		$	18		$	(42	)	$	4		$	115		$	46
Other assets(3)		72		72		—		—		106			96			—			—			178			168
Total	$	73	$	72	$	56	$	24	$	206		$	114		$	(42	)	$	4		$	293		$	214
Derivative liabilities:
Commodity	$	4	$	1	$	144	$	93	$	130		$	23		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	136		$	65
Transfer in(5)(6)		—		—		5		5		—			—			—			—			5			5
Transfer out(5)(6)		—		—		—		—		(5	)		(5	)		—			—			(5	)		(5	)
Commodity(1)	$	4	$	1	$	149	$	98	$	125		$	18		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	136		$	65
Interest rate contract(2)		—		—		—		—		10			—			—			—			10			—
Total	$	4	$	1	$	149	$	98	$	135		$	18		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	146		$	65

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note I.

(2) See Note I.

(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.

(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(5) The Companies' policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of the levels at the end of the reporting period.

(6) Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because of availability of observable market data due to decrease in the terms of certain contracts from beyond one year as of December 31, 2010 to less than one year as of June 30, 2011.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 are summarized below.

	Level 1				Level 2						Level 3						Netting Adjustments(4)						Total
(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative assets:
Commodity(1)	$	2	$	1	$	72		$	21		$	144		$	13		$	(112	)	$	13		$	106		$	48
Other assets(3)		65		64		—			—			101			92			—			—			166			156
Total	$	67	$	65	$	72		$	21		$	245		$	105		$	(112	)	$	13		$	272		$	204
Derivative liabilities:
Commodity	$	4	$	2	$	270		$	177		$	205		$	12		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	191		$	100
Transfer in(5)(6)(7)		—		—		(36	)		(36	)		(9	)		(9	)		—			—			(45	)		(45	)
Transfer out(5)(6)(7)		—		—		9			9			36			36			—			—			45			45
Commodity(1)	$	4	$	2	$	243		$	150		$	232		$	39		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	191		$	100
Interest rate contract(2)		—		—		—			—			10			—			—			—			10			—
Total	$	4	$	2	$	243		$	150		$	242		$	39		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	201		$	100

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

(2) See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.

(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(5) The Companies' policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of the levels at the end of the reporting period.

(6) Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 because of reassessment of the levels in the fair value hierarchy within which certain inputs fall.

(7) Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because of availability of observable market data due to decrease in the terms of certain contracts from beyond one year as of December 31, 2009 to less than one year as of December 31, 2010.

The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy below.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of April 1, 2011			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities		Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2011
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(31	)	$	(14	)	$	14	$	5	$	—	$	(2	)	$	3		$	—	$	(25	)
Interest rate contract		(10	)		(1	)		—		—		—		—			1			—		(10	)
Other assets(1)		105			1			—		—		—		—			—			—		106
Total	$	64		$	(14	)	$	14	$	5	$	—	$	(2	)	$	4		$	—	$	71
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	2		$	(1	)	$	2	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(4	)	$	—	$	—
Other assets(1)		95			1			—		—		—		—			—			—		96
Total	$	97		$	—		$	2	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(4	)	$	—	$	96

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2011			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities		Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2011
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(88	)	$	2		$	45	$	14	$	—	$	(4	)	$	1		$	5	$	(25	)
Interest rate contract		(10	)		(2	)		—		—		—		—			2			—		(10	)
Other assets(1)		101			3			2		—		—		—			—			—		106
Total	$	3		$	3		$	47	$	14	$	—	$	(4	)	$	3		$	5	$	71
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(26	)	$	(3	)	$	20	$	11	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	5	$	—
Other assets(1)		92			3			1		—		—		—			—			—		96
Total	$	66		$	—		$	21	$	11	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	5	$	96

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy below.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
				Total Gains/(Losses) — Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of April 1, 2010			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities			Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2010
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(168	)	$	9		$	33		$	3	$	—	$	(2	)	$	6		$	18	$	(101	)
Interest rate contract		(11	)		(1	)		(1	)		—		—		—			1			—		(12	)
Other assets(1)		93			—			1			—		—		—			—			—		94
Total	$	(86	)	$	8		$	33		$	3	$	—	$	(2	)	$	7		$	18	$	(19	)
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(48	)	$	(2	)	$	3		$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(2	)	$	18	$	(30	)
Other assets(1)		84			—			1			—		—		—			—			—		85
Total	$	36		$	(2	)	$	4		$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(2	)	$	18	$	55

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2010			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities			Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2010
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(59	)	$	(34	)	$	(40	)	$	3	$	—	$	(3	)	$	14		$	18	$	(101	)
Interest rate contract		(11	)		(2	)		(1	)		—		—		—			2			—		(12	)
Other assets(1)		92			—			2			—		—		—			—			—		94
Total	$	22		$	(36	)	$	(39	)	$	3	$	—	$	(3	)	$	16		$	18	$	(19	)
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(5	)	$	(7	)	$	(30	)	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	18	$	(30	)
Other assets(1)		83			—			2			—		—		—			—			—		85
Total	$	78		$	(7	)	$	(28	)	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	18	$	55

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

For the Utilities, realized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported as part of purchased power, gas and fuel costs. The Utilities generally recover these costs in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable state public utilities commissions. See Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Unrealized gains and losses for commodity derivatives are generally deferred on the consolidated balance sheet in accordance with the accounting rules for regulated operations.

For the competitive energy businesses, realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported in non-utility revenues ($4 million loss and $27 million loss) and purchased power costs ($1 million loss and $49 million gain) on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported in non-utility revenues ($3 million loss and $33 million gain) and purchased power costs ($21 million gain and $40 million loss) on the consolidated income statement for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The change in fair value relating to Level 3 commodity derivative assets held at June 30, 2011 and 2010 is included in non-utility revenues ($13 million loss and $45 million loss), and purchased power costs ($6 million gain and $64 million gain) on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the change in fair value relating to Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities included in non-utility revenues ($25 million loss and $1 million gain) and purchased power costs ($36 million gain and $7 million loss) on the consolidated income statement.

The accounting rules for fair value measurements and disclosures require consideration of the impact of nonperformance risk (including credit risk) from a market participant perspective in the measurement of the fair value of assets and liabilities. At June 30, 2011, the Companies determined that nonperformance risk would have no material impact on their financial position or results of operations. To assess nonperformance risk, the Companies considered information such as collateral requirements, master netting arrangements, letters of credit and parent company guarantees, and applied a market-based method by using the counterparty's (for an asset) or the Companies' (for a liability) credit default swaps rates.

CECONY [Member]

Fair Value Measurements

Note J — Fair Value Measurements

Reference is made to Note P to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 are summarized below.

	Level 1				Level 2				Level 3						Netting Adjustments(4)						Total
(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative assets:
Commodity(1)	$	1	$	—	$	56	$	24	$	100		$	18		$	(42	)	$	4		$	115		$	46
Other assets(3)		72		72		—		—		106			96			—			—			178			168
Total	$	73	$	72	$	56	$	24	$	206		$	114		$	(42	)	$	4		$	293		$	214
Derivative liabilities:
Commodity	$	4	$	1	$	144	$	93	$	130		$	23		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	136		$	65
Transfer in(5)(6)		—		—		5		5		—			—			—			—			5			5
Transfer out(5)(6)		—		—		—		—		(5	)		(5	)		—			—			(5	)		(5	)
Commodity(1)	$	4	$	1	$	149	$	98	$	125		$	18		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	136		$	65
Interest rate contract(2)		—		—		—		—		10			—			—			—			10			—
Total	$	4	$	1	$	149	$	98	$	135		$	18		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	146		$	65

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note I.

(2) See Note I.

(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.

(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(5) The Companies' policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of the levels at the end of the reporting period.

(6) Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because of availability of observable market data due to decrease in the terms of certain contracts from beyond one year as of December 31, 2010 to less than one year as of June 30, 2011.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 are summarized below.

	Level 1				Level 2						Level 3						Netting Adjustments(4)						Total
(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative assets:
Commodity(1)	$	2	$	1	$	72		$	21		$	144		$	13		$	(112	)	$	13		$	106		$	48
Other assets(3)		65		64		—			—			101			92			—			—			166			156
Total	$	67	$	65	$	72		$	21		$	245		$	105		$	(112	)	$	13		$	272		$	204
Derivative liabilities:
Commodity	$	4	$	2	$	270		$	177		$	205		$	12		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	191		$	100
Transfer in(5)(6)(7)		—		—		(36	)		(36	)		(9	)		(9	)		—			—			(45	)		(45	)
Transfer out(5)(6)(7)		—		—		9			9			36			36			—			—			45			45
Commodity(1)	$	4	$	2	$	243		$	150		$	232		$	39		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	191		$	100
Interest rate contract(2)		—		—		—			—			10			—			—			—			10			—
Total	$	4	$	2	$	243		$	150		$	242		$	39		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	201		$	100

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

(2) See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.

(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(5) The Companies' policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of the levels at the end of the reporting period.

(6) Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 because of reassessment of the levels in the fair value hierarchy within which certain inputs fall.

(7) Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because of availability of observable market data due to decrease in the terms of certain contracts from beyond one year as of December 31, 2009 to less than one year as of December 31, 2010.

The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy below.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of April 1, 2011			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities		Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2011
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(31	)	$	(14	)	$	14	$	5	$	—	$	(2	)	$	3		$	—	$	(25	)
Interest rate contract		(10	)		(1	)		—		—		—		—			1			—		(10	)
Other assets(1)		105			1			—		—		—		—			—			—		106
Total	$	64		$	(14	)	$	14	$	5	$	—	$	(2	)	$	4		$	—	$	71
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	2		$	(1	)	$	2	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(4	)	$	—	$	—
Other assets(1)		95			1			—		—		—		—			—			—		96
Total	$	97		$	—		$	2	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(4	)	$	—	$	96

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2011			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities		Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2011
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(88	)	$	2		$	45	$	14	$	—	$	(4	)	$	1		$	5	$	(25	)
Interest rate contract		(10	)		(2	)		—		—		—		—			2			—		(10	)
Other assets(1)		101			3			2		—		—		—			—			—		106
Total	$	3		$	3		$	47	$	14	$	—	$	(4	)	$	3		$	5	$	71
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(26	)	$	(3	)	$	20	$	11	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	5	$	—
Other assets(1)		92			3			1		—		—		—			—			—		96
Total	$	66		$	—		$	21	$	11	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	5	$	96

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy below.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
				Total Gains/(Losses) — Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of April 1, 2010			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities			Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2010
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(168	)	$	9		$	33		$	3	$	—	$	(2	)	$	6		$	18	$	(101	)
Interest rate contract		(11	)		(1	)		(1	)		—		—		—			1			—		(12	)
Other assets(1)		93			—			1			—		—		—			—			—		94
Total	$	(86	)	$	8		$	33		$	3	$	—	$	(2	)	$	7		$	18	$	(19	)
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(48	)	$	(2	)	$	3		$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(2	)	$	18	$	(30	)
Other assets(1)		84			—			1			—		—		—			—			—		85
Total	$	36		$	(2	)	$	4		$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(2	)	$	18	$	55

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2010			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities			Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2010
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(59	)	$	(34	)	$	(40	)	$	3	$	—	$	(3	)	$	14		$	18	$	(101	)
Interest rate contract		(11	)		(2	)		(1	)		—		—		—			2			—		(12	)
Other assets(1)		92			—			2			—		—		—			—			—		94
Total	$	22		$	(36	)	$	(39	)	$	3	$	—	$	(3	)	$	16		$	18	$	(19	)
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(5	)	$	(7	)	$	(30	)	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	18	$	(30	)
Other assets(1)		83			—			2			—		—		—			—			—		85
Total	$	78		$	(7	)	$	(28	)	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	18	$	55

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

For the Utilities, realized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported as part of purchased power, gas and fuel costs. The Utilities generally recover these costs in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable state public utilities commissions. See Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. Unrealized gains and losses for commodity derivatives are generally deferred on the consolidated balance sheet in accordance with the accounting rules for regulated operations.

For the competitive energy businesses, realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported in non-utility revenues ($4 million loss and $27 million loss) and purchased power costs ($1 million loss and $49 million gain) on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities are reported in non-utility revenues ($3 million loss and $33 million gain) and purchased power costs ($21 million gain and $40 million loss) on the consolidated income statement for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. The change in fair value relating to Level 3 commodity derivative assets held at June 30, 2011 and 2010 is included in non-utility revenues ($13 million loss and $45 million loss), and purchased power costs ($6 million gain and $64 million gain) on the consolidated income statement for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, the change in fair value relating to Level 3 commodity derivative assets and liabilities included in non-utility revenues ($25 million loss and $1 million gain) and purchased power costs ($36 million gain and $7 million loss) on the consolidated income statement.

The accounting rules for fair value measurements and disclosures require consideration of the impact of nonperformance risk (including credit risk) from a market participant perspective in the measurement of the fair value of assets and liabilities. At June 30, 2011, the Companies determined that nonperformance risk would have no material impact on their financial position or results of operations. To assess nonperformance risk, the Companies considered information such as collateral requirements, master netting arrangements, letters of credit and parent company guarantees, and applied a market-based method by using the counterparty's (for an asset) or the Companies' (for a liability) credit default swaps rates.

XML



Environmental Matters

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Environmental Matters

Note F — Environmental Matters

Superfund Sites

Hazardous substances, such as asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and coal tar, have been used or generated in the course of operations of the Utilities and their predecessors and are present at sites and in facilities and equipment they currently or previously owned, including sites at which gas was manufactured or stored.

The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 and similar state statutes (Superfund) impose joint and several liability, regardless of fault, upon generators of hazardous substances for investigation and remediation costs (which include costs of demolition, removal, disposal, storage, replacement, containment, and monitoring) and natural resource damages. Liability under these laws can be material and may be imposed for contamination from past acts, even though such past acts may have been lawful at the time they occurred. The sites at which the Utilities have been asserted to have liability under these laws, including their manufactured gas plant sites and any neighboring areas to which contamination may have migrated, are referred to herein as "Superfund Sites."

For Superfund Sites where there are other potentially responsible parties and the Utilities are not managing the site investigation and remediation, the accrued liability represents an estimate of the amount the Utilities will need to pay to investigate and, where determinable, discharge their related obligations. For Superfund Sites (including the manufactured gas plant sites) for which one of the Utilities is managing the investigation and remediation, the accrued liability represents an estimate of the company's share of undiscounted cost to investigate the sites and, for sites that have been investigated in whole or in part, the cost to remediate the sites, if remediation is necessary and if a reasonable estimate of such cost can be made. Remediation costs are estimated in light of the information available, applicable remediation standards, and experience with similar sites.

The accrued liabilities and regulatory assets related to Superfund Sites at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Accrued Liabilities:
Manufactured gas plant sites	$	434	$	446	$	317	$	327
Other Superfund Sites		68		66		67		65
Total	$	502	$	512	$	384	$	392
Regulatory assets	$	683	$	692	$	564	$	571

Most of the accrued Superfund Site liability relates to sites that have been investigated, in whole or in part. However, for some of the sites, the extent and associated cost of the required remediation has not yet been determined. As investigations progress and information pertaining to the required remediation becomes available, the Utilities expect that additional liability may be accrued, the amount of which is not presently determinable, but may be material. Under their current rate agreements, the Utilities are permitted to recover or defer as regulatory assets (for subsequent recovery through rates) certain site investigation and remediation costs. In February 2011, the NYSPSC initiated a proceeding to examine the existing mechanisms pursuant to which utilities recover such costs and possible alternatives.

Environmental remediation costs incurred related to Superfund Sites for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, were as follows:

For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Remediation costs incurred	$	10	$	14	$	8	$	13

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Remediation costs incurred	$	16	$	23	$	14	$	21

Insurance recoveries related to Superfund Sites for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were immaterial.

In 2010, CECONY estimated that for its manufactured gas plant sites, its aggregate undiscounted potential liability for the investigation and remediation of coal tar and/or other manufactured gas plant-related environmental contaminants could range up to $1.9 billion. In 2010, O&R estimated that for its manufactured gas plant sites, each of which has been investigated, the aggregate undiscounted potential liability for the remediation of such contaminants could range up to $200 million. These estimates were based on the assumption that there is contamination at all sites, including those that have not yet been fully investigated and additional assumptions about the extent of the contamination and the type and extent of the remediation that may be required. Actual experience may be materially different.

Asbestos Proceedings

Suits have been brought in New York State and federal courts against the Utilities and many other defendants, wherein a large number of plaintiffs sought large amounts of compensatory and punitive damages for deaths and injuries allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos at various premises of the Utilities. The suits that have been resolved, which are many, have been resolved without any payment by the Utilities, or for amounts that were not, in the aggregate, material to them. The amounts specified in all the remaining thousands of suits total billions of dollars; however, the Utilities believe that these amounts are greatly exaggerated, based on the disposition of previous claims. In 2010, CECONY estimated that its aggregate undiscounted potential liability for these suits and additional suits that may be brought over the next 15 years is $10 million. The estimate was based upon a combination of modeling, historical data analysis and risk factor assessment. Actual experience may be materially different. In addition, certain current and former employees have claimed or are claiming workers' compensation benefits based on alleged disability from exposure to asbestos. Under its current rate agreements, CECONY is permitted to defer as regulatory assets (for subsequent recovery through rates) costs incurred for its asbestos lawsuits and workers' compensation claims. The accrued liability for asbestos suits and workers' compensation proceedings (including those related to asbestos exposure) and the amounts deferred as regulatory assets for the Companies at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Accrued liability – asbestos suits	$	10	$	10	$	10	$	10
Regulatory assets – asbestos suits	$	10	$	10	$	10	$	10
Accrued liability – workers' compensation	$	103	$	106	$	98	$	101
Regulatory assets – workers' compensation	$	28	$	31	$	28	$	31

CECONY [Member]

Environmental Matters

Note F — Environmental Matters

Superfund Sites

Hazardous substances, such as asbestos, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) and coal tar, have been used or generated in the course of operations of the Utilities and their predecessors and are present at sites and in facilities and equipment they currently or previously owned, including sites at which gas was manufactured or stored.

The Federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 and similar state statutes (Superfund) impose joint and several liability, regardless of fault, upon generators of hazardous substances for investigation and remediation costs (which include costs of demolition, removal, disposal, storage, replacement, containment, and monitoring) and natural resource damages. Liability under these laws can be material and may be imposed for contamination from past acts, even though such past acts may have been lawful at the time they occurred. The sites at which the Utilities have been asserted to have liability under these laws, including their manufactured gas plant sites and any neighboring areas to which contamination may have migrated, are referred to herein as "Superfund Sites."

For Superfund Sites where there are other potentially responsible parties and the Utilities are not managing the site investigation and remediation, the accrued liability represents an estimate of the amount the Utilities will need to pay to investigate and, where determinable, discharge their related obligations. For Superfund Sites (including the manufactured gas plant sites) for which one of the Utilities is managing the investigation and remediation, the accrued liability represents an estimate of the company's share of undiscounted cost to investigate the sites and, for sites that have been investigated in whole or in part, the cost to remediate the sites, if remediation is necessary and if a reasonable estimate of such cost can be made. Remediation costs are estimated in light of the information available, applicable remediation standards, and experience with similar sites.

The accrued liabilities and regulatory assets related to Superfund Sites at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Accrued Liabilities:
Manufactured gas plant sites	$	434	$	446	$	317	$	327
Other Superfund Sites		68		66		67		65
Total	$	502	$	512	$	384	$	392
Regulatory assets	$	683	$	692	$	564	$	571

Most of the accrued Superfund Site liability relates to sites that have been investigated, in whole or in part. However, for some of the sites, the extent and associated cost of the required remediation has not yet been determined. As investigations progress and information pertaining to the required remediation becomes available, the Utilities expect that additional liability may be accrued, the amount of which is not presently determinable, but may be material. Under their current rate agreements, the Utilities are permitted to recover or defer as regulatory assets (for subsequent recovery through rates) certain site investigation and remediation costs. In February 2011, the NYSPSC initiated a proceeding to examine the existing mechanisms pursuant to which utilities recover such costs and possible alternatives.

Environmental remediation costs incurred related to Superfund Sites for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Remediation costs incurred	$	10	$	14	$	8	$	13

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Remediation costs incurred	$	16	$	23	$	14	$	21

Insurance recoveries related to Superfund Sites for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were immaterial.

In 2010, CECONY estimated that for its manufactured gas plant sites, its aggregate undiscounted potential liability for the investigation and remediation of coal tar and/or other manufactured gas plant-related environmental contaminants could range up to $1.9 billion. In 2010, O&R estimated that for its manufactured gas plant sites, each of which has been investigated, the aggregate undiscounted potential liability for the remediation of such contaminants could range up to $200 million. These estimates were based on the assumption that there is contamination at all sites, including those that have not yet been fully investigated and additional assumptions about the extent of the contamination and the type and extent of the remediation that may be required. Actual experience may be materially different.

Asbestos Proceedings

Suits have been brought in New York State and federal courts against the Utilities and many other defendants, wherein a large number of plaintiffs sought large amounts of compensatory and punitive damages for deaths and injuries allegedly caused by exposure to asbestos at various premises of the Utilities. The suits that have been resolved, which are many, have been resolved without any payment by the Utilities, or for amounts that were not, in the aggregate, material to them. The amounts specified in all the remaining thousands of suits total billions of dollars; however, the Utilities believe that these amounts are greatly exaggerated, based on the disposition of previous claims. In 2010, CECONY estimated that its aggregate undiscounted potential liability for these suits and additional suits that may be brought over the next 15 years is $10 million. The estimate was based upon a combination of modeling, historical data analysis and risk factor assessment. Actual experience may be materially different. In addition, certain current and former employees have claimed or are claiming workers' compensation benefits based on alleged disability from exposure to asbestos. Under its current rate agreements, CECONY is permitted to defer as regulatory assets (for subsequent recovery through rates) costs incurred for its asbestos lawsuits and workers' compensation claims. The accrued liability for asbestos suits and workers' compensation proceedings (including those related to asbestos exposure) and the amounts deferred as regulatory assets for the Companies at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Accrued liability – asbestos suits	$	10	$	10	$	10	$	10
Regulatory assets – asbestos suits	$	10	$	10	$	10	$	10
Accrued liability – workers' compensation	$	103	$	106	$	98	$	101
Regulatory assets – workers' compensation	$	28	$	31	$	28	$	31

XML



Regulatory Matters (Regulatory Assets And Liabilities) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Regulatory assets	$ 7,261	$ 7,683
Regulatory assets - current	130	203
Total Regulatory Assets	7,391	7,886
Regulatory liabilities	866	690
Regulatory liabilities - current	198	257
Total Regulatory Liabilities	1,064	947
Unrecognized Pension and Other Postretirement Costs [Member]
Regulatory assets	3,921	4,371
Future Federal Income Tax [Member]
Regulatory assets	1,730	1,593
Environmental Remediation Costs [Member]
Regulatory assets	684	695
Pension and Other Post Retirement Benefits Deferrals [Member]
Regulatory assets	183	138
Revenue Taxes [Member]
Regulatory assets	155	145
Net Electric Deferrals [Member]
Regulatory assets	130	156
Surcharge for New York State Assessment [Member]
Regulatory assets	98	121
Deferred Storm Costs [Member]
Regulatory assets	53	57
O & R Transition Bond Charges [Member]
Regulatory assets	47	48
Deferred Derivative Losses - Long-Term [Member]
Regulatory assets	44	74
Property Tax Reconciliation [Member]
Regulatory assets	31	34
Workers' Compensation [Member]
Regulatory assets	28	31
World Trade Center Restoration Costs [Member]
Regulatory assets	13	45
Recoverable Energy [Member]
Regulatory assets		42
Other [Member]
Regulatory assets	144	133
Deferred Derivative Losses - Current [Member]
Regulatory assets - current	121	190
Recoverable Energy Costs - Current [Member]
Regulatory assets - current	9	13
Allowance for Cost of Removal Less Salvage [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	430	422
Revenue Decoupling Mechanism [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	81	38
World Trade Center Settlement Proceeds [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	62
Carrying Changes On T&D Net Plant [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	40	28
Energy Efficiency Programs [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	28	19
New York State Tax Refund [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	20	30
Gain on Sale of Properties [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	15	31
Bonus Depreciation [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	13	1
Expenditure Prudence Proceeding [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	11
Other Liabilities [Member]
Regulatory liabilities	166	121
Net Unbilled Revenue Deferrals - Current [Member]
Regulatory liabilities - current	117	136
Refundable Energy Cost - Current [Member]
Regulatory liabilities - current	75	117
Deferred Derivative Gains - Current [Member]
Regulatory liabilities - current	$ 6	$ 4

XML



Pension Benefits

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Pension Benefits

Note D — Pension Benefits

Reference is made to Note E to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note D to the financial statement in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the Companies' net periodic benefit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost – including administrative expenses	$	47		$	42		$	44		$	39
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		140			139			131			130
Expected return on plan assets		(183	)		(176	)		(175	)		(167	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		132			106			125			100
Amortization of prior service costs		2			2			2			2
NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	138		$	113		$	127		$	104
Amortization of regulatory asset		1			1			1			1
TOTAL PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	139		$	114		$	128		$	105
Cost capitalized		(48	)		(37	)		(45	)		(34	)
Cost deferred		(6	)		(33	)		(7	)		(32	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	85		$	44		$	76		$	39

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost – including administrative expenses	$	94		$	84		$	88		$	78
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		280			278			262			260
Expected return on plan assets		(366	)		(352	)		(350	)		(334	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		264			212			250			200
Amortization of prior service costs		4			4			4			4
NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	276		$	226		$	254		$	208
Amortization of regulatory asset		1			1			1			1
TOTAL PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	277		$	227		$	255		$	209
Cost capitalized		(96	)		(78	)		(89	)		(73	)
Cost deferred		(57	)		(56	)		(59	)		(53	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	124		$	93		$	107		$	83

Expected Contributions

Based on estimates as of March 31, 2011, the Companies are not required under funding regulations and laws to make any contributions to the pension plan during 2011. The Companies' policy is to fund their accounting cost to the extent tax deductible. In 2011, Con Edison expects to make discretionary contributions to the pension plan of $533 million, of which CECONY contributed $491 million during the first six months of 2011. During the first six months of 2010, CECONY contributed $279 million to the pension plan. During the first six months of 2011, the Companies funded $11 million for the non-qualified supplemental pension plans.

CECONY [Member]

Pension Benefits

Note D — Pension Benefits

Reference is made to Note E to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note D to the financial statement in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

Net Periodic Benefit Cost

The components of the Companies' net periodic benefit costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 were as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost – including administrative expenses	$	47		$	42		$	44		$	39
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		140			139			131			130
Expected return on plan assets		(183	)		(176	)		(175	)		(167	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		132			106			125			100
Amortization of prior service costs		2			2			2			2
NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	138		$	113		$	127		$	104
Amortization of regulatory asset		1			1			1			1
TOTAL PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	139		$	114		$	128		$	105
Cost capitalized		(48	)		(37	)		(45	)		(34	)
Cost deferred		(6	)		(33	)		(7	)		(32	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	85		$	44		$	76		$	39

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Service cost – including administrative expenses	$	94		$	84		$	88		$	78
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation		280			278			262			260
Expected return on plan assets		(366	)		(352	)		(350	)		(334	)
Amortization of net actuarial loss		264			212			250			200
Amortization of prior service costs		4			4			4			4
NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	276		$	226		$	254		$	208
Amortization of regulatory asset		1			1			1			1
TOTAL PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	$	277		$	227		$	255		$	209
Cost capitalized		(96	)		(78	)		(89	)		(73	)
Cost deferred		(57	)		(56	)		(59	)		(53	)
Cost charged to operating expenses	$	124		$	93		$	107		$	83

Expected Contributions

Based on estimates as of March 31, 2011, the Companies are not required under funding regulations and laws to make any contributions to the pension plan during 2011. The Companies' policy is to fund their accounting cost to the extent tax deductible. In 2011, Con Edison expects to make discretionary contributions to the pension plan of $533 million, of which CECONY contributed $491 million during the first six months of 2011. During the first six months of 2010, CECONY contributed $279 million to the pension plan. During the first six months of 2011, the Companies funded $11 million for the non-qualified supplemental pension plans.

XML



Consolidated Statement Of Comprehensive Income (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Consolidated Statement Of Comprehensive Income
NET INCOME	$ 168	$ 186	$ 483	$ 415
OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS), NET OF TAXES
Pension plan liability adjustments, net of taxes of $1 and $3 in 2011 and $1 and $3 in 2010, respectively	2	1	5	4
TOTAL OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME/(LOSS), NET OF TAXES	2	1	5	4
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME	170	187	488	419
Preferred stock dividend requirements of subsidiary	(3)	(3)	(6)	(6)
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK	$ 167	$ 184	$ 482	$ 413

XML



General

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

General

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

General

These combined notes accompany and form an integral part of the separate consolidated financial statements of each of the two separate registrants: Consolidated Edison, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Con Edison) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and its subsidiaries (CECONY). CECONY is a subsidiary of Con Edison and as such its financial condition and results of operations and cash flows, which are presented separately in the CECONY consolidated financial statements, are also consolidated, along with those of Con Edison's other utility subsidiary, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R), and Con Edison's competitive energy businesses (discussed below) in Con Edison's consolidated financial statements. The term "Utilities" is used in these notes to refer to CECONY and O&R.

As used in these notes, the term "Companies" refers to Con Edison and CECONY and, except as otherwise noted, the information in these combined notes relates to each of the Companies. However, CECONY makes no representation as to information relating to Con Edison or the subsidiaries of Con Edison other than itself.

The separate interim consolidated financial statements of each of the Companies are unaudited but, in the opinion of their respective managements, reflect all adjustments (which include only normally recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The Companies' separate interim consolidated financial statements should be read together with their separate audited financial statements (including the combined notes thereto) included in Item 8 of their combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) and their separate unaudited financial statements (including the combined notes thereto) included in Part I, Item 1 of their combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the First Quarter Form 10-Q). Information in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K and the First Quarter Form 10-Q referred to in these notes is incorporated by reference herein. The use of terms such as "see" or "refer to" shall be deemed to incorporate by reference into these notes the information to which reference is made. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Con Edison has two regulated utility subsidiaries: CECONY and O&R. CECONY provides electric service and gas service in New York City and Westchester County. The company also provides steam service in parts of Manhattan. O&R, along with its regulated utility subsidiaries, provides electric service in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of northern New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania and gas service in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of eastern Pennsylvania. Con Edison has the following competitive energy businesses: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc. (Con Edison Solutions), a retail energy services company that sells electricity and also offers energy-related services; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc. (Con Edison Energy), a wholesale energy supply and services company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc. (Con Edison Development), a company that develops and participates in infrastructure projects.

CECONY [Member]

General

General

These combined notes accompany and form an integral part of the separate consolidated financial statements of each of the two separate registrants: Consolidated Edison, Inc. and its subsidiaries (Con Edison) and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. and its subsidiaries (CECONY). CECONY is a subsidiary of Con Edison and as such its financial condition and results of operations and cash flows, which are presented separately in the CECONY consolidated financial statements, are also consolidated, along with those of Con Edison's other utility subsidiary, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. (O&R), and Con Edison's competitive energy businesses (discussed below) in Con Edison's consolidated financial statements. The term "Utilities" is used in these notes to refer to CECONY and O&R.

As used in these notes, the term "Companies" refers to Con Edison and CECONY and, except as otherwise noted, the information in these combined notes relates to each of the Companies. However, CECONY makes no representation as to information relating to Con Edison or the subsidiaries of Con Edison other than itself.

The separate interim consolidated financial statements of each of the Companies are unaudited but, in the opinion of their respective managements, reflect all adjustments (which include only normally recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for the interim periods presented. The Companies' separate interim consolidated financial statements should be read together with their separate audited financial statements (including the combined notes thereto) included in Item 8 of their combined Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 (the Form 10-K) and their separate unaudited financial statements (including the combined notes thereto) included in Part I, Item 1 of their combined Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended March 31, 2011 (the First Quarter Form 10-Q). Information in the notes to the consolidated financial statements in the Form 10-K and the First Quarter Form 10-Q referred to in these notes is incorporated by reference herein. The use of terms such as "see" or "refer to" shall be deemed to incorporate by reference into these notes the information to which reference is made. Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Con Edison has two regulated utility subsidiaries: CECONY and O&R. CECONY provides electric service and gas service in New York City and Westchester County. The company also provides steam service in parts of Manhattan. O&R, along with its regulated utility subsidiaries, provides electric service in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of northern New Jersey and eastern Pennsylvania and gas service in southeastern New York and adjacent areas of eastern Pennsylvania. Con Edison has the following competitive energy businesses: Consolidated Edison Solutions, Inc. (Con Edison Solutions), a retail energy services company that sells electricity and also offers energy-related services; Consolidated Edison Energy, Inc. (Con Edison Energy), a wholesale energy supply and services company; and Consolidated Edison Development, Inc. (Con Edison Development), a company that develops and participates in infrastructure projects.

XML



Other Material Contingencies (Total Guarantees) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	$ 834	$ 859
Guarantee Duration, 0-3 Years [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	671
Guarantee Duration, 0-3 Years [Member] | Financial and Performance Guarantee for Commodity Transactions [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	616
Guarantee Duration, 0-3 Years [Member] | Financial and Performance Guarantee for Intra-Company [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	15
Guarantee Duration, 0-3 Years [Member] | Financial and Performance Guarantee Other [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	40
Guarantee Duration, 4-10 Years [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	22
Guarantee Duration, 4-10 Years [Member] | Financial and Performance Guarantee for Commodity Transactions [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	8
Guarantee Duration, 4-10 Years [Member] | Financial and Performance Guarantee Other [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	14
Guarantee Duration, Greater than 10 Years [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	141
Guarantee Duration, Greater than 10 Years [Member] | Financial and Performance Guarantee for Commodity Transactions [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	140
Guarantee Duration, Greater than 10 Years [Member] | Financial and Performance Guarantee for Intra-Company [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	1
Financial and Performance Guarantee for Commodity Transactions [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	764
Financial and Performance Guarantee for Intra-Company [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	16
Financial and Performance Guarantee Other [Member]
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	$ 54

XML



Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Earnings Per Common Share) (Details) (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended				6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Mar. 31, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Mar. 31, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies
Net income for common stock	$ 165	$ 311	$ 183	$ 226	$ 477	$ 409
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic	292.7		282.0		292.3	281.7
Add: Incremental shares attributable to effect of potentially dilutive securities	1.6		1.5		1.6	1.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding - Diluted	294.3		283.5		293.9	283.2
Net income for common stock per common share - basic	$ 0.57		$ 0.65		$ 1.63	$ 1.45
Net income for common stock per common share - diluted	$ 0.56		$ 0.64		$ 1.62	$ 1.44

XML



Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

Note A — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Earnings Per Common Share

Reference is made to "Earnings Per Common Share" in Note A to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Con Edison's basic and diluted EPS for Con Edison are calculated as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Millions of Dollars, except per share amounts/Shares in Millions)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income for common stock	$	165	$	183	$	477	$	409
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic		292.7		282.0		292.3		281.7
Add: Incremental shares attributable to effect of potentially dilutive securities		1.6		1.5		1.6		1.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted		294.3		283.5		293.9		283.2
Net income for common stock per common share – basic	$	0.57	$	0.65	$	1.63	$	1.45
Net income for common stock per common share – diluted	$	0.56	$	0.64	$	1.62	$	1.44

CECONY [Member]

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

Note A — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Earnings Per Common Share

Reference is made to "Earnings Per Common Share" in Note A to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Con Edison's basic and diluted EPS for Con Edison are calculated as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Millions of Dollars, except per share amounts/Shares in Millions)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income for common stock	$	165	$	183	$	477	$	409
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic		292.7		282.0		292.3		281.7
Add: Incremental shares attributable to effect of potentially dilutive securities		1.6		1.5		1.6		1.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted		294.3		283.5		293.9		283.2
Net income for common stock per common share – basic	$	0.57	$	0.65	$	1.63	$	1.45
Net income for common stock per common share – diluted	$	0.56	$	0.64	$	1.62	$	1.44

XML



Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011
Energy supply and hedging activities credit exposure total	$ 152
Makeup of net credit exposure counterparties	58
Makeup of net credit exposure primarily with commodity exchange	53
Independent system operators	39
Number of contracts considered derivatives	1,705
Non-Investment Grade Counterparties [Member]
Makeup of net credit exposure primarily with commodity exchange	$ 2

XML



Financial Information By Business Segment (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Financial Information By Business Segment

Financial Data For The Business Segments

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,
	Operating revenues						Inter-segment revenues						Depreciation and amortization				Operating income
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
CECONY
Electric	$	2,013		$	2,104		$	3		$	2		$	162	$	156	$	350		$	319
Gas		296			239			1			1			27		25		31			44
Steam		107			89			20			18			16		15		(11	)		(29	)
Consolidation adjustments		—			—			(24	)		(21	)		—		—		—			—
Total CECONY	$	2,416		$	2,432		$	—		$	—		$	205	$	196	$	370		$	334
O&R
Electric	$	141		$	153		$	—		$	—		$	8	$	8	$	14		$	15
Gas		37			35			—			—			4		3		1			(1	)
Total O&R	$	178		$	188		$	—		$	—		$	12	$	11	$	15		$	14
Competitive energy businesses	$	406		$	406		$	2		$	2		$	2	$	4	$	14		$	81
Other*		(7	)		(9	)		(2	)		(2	)		—		—		(1	)		—
Total Con Edison	$	2,993		$	3,017		$	—		$	—		$	219	$	211	$	398		$	429

* Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30,
	Operating revenues						Inter-segment revenues						Depreciation and amortization				Operating income
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010			2011		2010		2011			2010
CECONY
Electric	$	3,734		$	3,832		$	6		$	6		$	324	$	307	$	566		$	514
Gas		959			922			2			2			54		50		237			259
Steam		432			396			40			36			32		31		114			73
Consolidation adjustments		—			—			(48	)		(44	)		—		—		—			—
Total CECONY	$	5,125		$	5,150		$	—		$	—		$	410	$	388	$	917		$	846
O&R
Electric	$	289		$	314		$	—		$	—		$	17	$	16	$	25		$	22
Gas		130			125			—			—			7		6		28			21
Total O&R	$	419		$	439		$	—		$	—		$	24	$	22	$	53		$	43
Competitive energy businesses	$	814		$	906		$	5		$	4		$	3	$	5	$	58		$	33
Other*		(16	)		(17	)		(5	)		(4	)		—		—		(4	)		(1	)
Total Con Edison	$	6,342		$	6,478		$	—		$	—		$	437	$	415	$	1,024		$	921

* Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

XML



Short-Term Borrowing (Details) (USD $)	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Short-Term Borrowing
Commercial paper outstanding	$ 0	$ 0
Letters of credit outstanding under the credit agreement	$ 188,000,000	$ 197,000,000

XML



Financial Information By Business Segment (Financial Data For The Business Segments) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended				6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011		Jun. 30, 2010		Jun. 30, 2011		Jun. 30, 2010
Operating revenues	$ 2,993		$ 3,017		$ 6,342		$ 6,478
Depreciation and amortization	219		211		437		415
Operating income	398		429		1,024		921
CECONY - Electric [Member]
Operating revenues	2,013		2,104		3,734		3,832
Inter-segment revenues	3		2		6		6
Depreciation and amortization	162		156		324		307
Operating income	350		319		566		514
CECONY - Gas [Member]
Operating revenues	296		239		959		922
Inter-segment revenues	1		1		2		2
Depreciation and amortization	27		25		54		50
Operating income	31		44		237		259
CECONY - Steam [Member]
Operating revenues	107		89		432		396
Inter-segment revenues	20		18		40		36
Depreciation and amortization	16		15		32		31
Operating income	(11)		(29)		114		73
O&R - Electric [Member]
Operating revenues	141		153		289		314
Depreciation and amortization	8		8		17		16
Operating income	14		15		25		22
O&R - Gas [Member]
Operating revenues	37		35		130		125
Depreciation and amortization	4		3		7		6
Operating income	1		(1)		28		21
Competitive Energy Businesses [Member]
Operating revenues	406		406		814		906
Inter-segment revenues	2		2		5		4
Depreciation and amortization	2		4		3		5
Operating income	14		81		58		33
Other Revenues and Eliminations in Segment Information [Member]
Operating revenues	(7)	[1]	(9)	[1]	(16)	[1]	(17)	[1]
Inter-segment revenues	(2)	[1]	(2)	[1]	(5)	[1]	(4)	[1]
Operating income	(1)	[1]			(4)	[1]	(1)	[1]
CECONY [Member]
Operating revenues	2,416		2,432		5,125		5,150
Depreciation and amortization	205		196		410		388
Operating income	370		334		917		846
Consolidation Adjustments [Member]
Inter-segment revenues	(24)		(21)		(48)		(44)
O&R [Member]
Operating revenues	178		188		419		439
Depreciation and amortization	12		11		24		22
Operating income	$ 15		$ 14		$ 53		$ 43

[1] Parent company expenses, primarily interest, and consolidation adjustments. Other does not represent a business segment.

XML



Fair Value Measurements (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Fair Value Measurements

Assets And Liabilities Measured At Fair Value On A Recurring Basis

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2011 are summarized below.

	Level 1				Level 2				Level 3						Netting Adjustments(4)						Total
(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative assets:
Commodity(1)	$	1	$	—	$	56	$	24	$	100		$	18		$	(42	)	$	4		$	115		$	46
Other assets(3)		72		72		—		—		106			96			—			—			178			168
Total	$	73	$	72	$	56	$	24	$	206		$	114		$	(42	)	$	4		$	293		$	214
Derivative liabilities:
Commodity	$	4	$	1	$	144	$	93	$	130		$	23		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	136		$	65
Transfer in(5)(6)		—		—		5		5		—			—			—			—			5			5
Transfer out(5)(6)		—		—		—		—		(5	)		(5	)		—			—			(5	)		(5	)
Commodity(1)	$	4	$	1	$	149	$	98	$	125		$	18		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	136		$	65
Interest rate contract(2)		—		—		—		—		10			—			—			—			10			—
Total	$	4	$	1	$	149	$	98	$	135		$	18		$	(142	)	$	(52	)	$	146		$	65

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note I.

(2) See Note I.

(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.

(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(5) The Companies' policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of the levels at the end of the reporting period.

(6) Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because of availability of observable market data due to decrease in the terms of certain contracts from beyond one year as of December 31, 2010 to less than one year as of June 30, 2011.

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2010 are summarized below.

	Level 1				Level 2						Level 3						Netting Adjustments(4)						Total
(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison		CECONY		Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY			Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative assets:
Commodity(1)	$	2	$	1	$	72		$	21		$	144		$	13		$	(112	)	$	13		$	106		$	48
Other assets(3)		65		64		—			—			101			92			—			—			166			156
Total	$	67	$	65	$	72		$	21		$	245		$	105		$	(112	)	$	13		$	272		$	204
Derivative liabilities:
Commodity	$	4	$	2	$	270		$	177		$	205		$	12		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	191		$	100
Transfer in(5)(6)(7)		—		—		(36	)		(36	)		(9	)		(9	)		—			—			(45	)		(45	)
Transfer out(5)(6)(7)		—		—		9			9			36			36			—			—			45			45
Commodity(1)	$	4	$	2	$	243		$	150		$	232		$	39		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	191		$	100
Interest rate contract(2)		—		—		—			—			10			—			—			—			10			—
Total	$	4	$	2	$	243		$	150		$	242		$	39		$	(288	)	$	(91	)	$	201		$	100

(1) A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

(2) See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

(3) Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.

(4) Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

(5) The Companies' policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of the levels at the end of the reporting period.

(6) Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 because of reassessment of the levels in the fair value hierarchy within which certain inputs fall.

(7) Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because of availability of observable market data due to decrease in the terms of certain contracts from beyond one year as of December 31, 2009 to less than one year as of December 31, 2010.

Reconciliation Of The Beginning And Ending Net Balances For Assets And Liabilities Measured At Level 3 Fair Value

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2011
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of April 1, 2011			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities		Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2011
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(31	)	$	(14	)	$	14	$	5	$	—	$	(2	)	$	3		$	—	$	(25	)
Interest rate contract		(10	)		(1	)		—		—		—		—			1			—		(10	)
Other assets(1)		105			1			—		—		—		—			—			—		106
Total	$	64		$	(14	)	$	14	$	5	$	—	$	(2	)	$	4		$	—	$	71
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	2		$	(1	)	$	2	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(4	)	$	—	$	—
Other assets(1)		95			1			—		—		—		—			—			—		96
Total	$	97		$	—		$	2	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(4	)	$	—	$	96

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2011			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities		Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2011
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(88	)	$	2		$	45	$	14	$	—	$	(4	)	$	1		$	5	$	(25	)
Interest rate contract		(10	)		(2	)		—		—		—		—			2			—		(10	)
Other assets(1)		101			3			2		—		—		—			—			—		106
Total	$	3		$	3		$	47	$	14	$	—	$	(4	)	$	3		$	5	$	71
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(26	)	$	(3	)	$	20	$	11	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	5	$	—
Other assets(1)		92			3			1		—		—		—			—			—		96
Total	$	66		$	—		$	21	$	11	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	5	$	96

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

The table listed below provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending net balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy below.

	For the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
				Total Gains/(Losses) — Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of April 1, 2010			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities			Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2010
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(168	)	$	9		$	33		$	3	$	—	$	(2	)	$	6		$	18	$	(101	)
Interest rate contract		(11	)		(1	)		(1	)		—		—		—			1			—		(12	)
Other assets(1)		93			—			1			—		—		—			—			—		94
Total	$	(86	)	$	8		$	33		$	3	$	—	$	(2	)	$	7		$	18	$	(19	)
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(48	)	$	(2	)	$	3		$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(2	)	$	18	$	(30	)
Other assets(1)		84			—			1			—		—		—			—			—		85
Total	$	36		$	(2	)	$	4		$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(2	)	$	18	$	55

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

	For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
				Total Gains/(Losses)— Realized and Unrealized
(Millions of Dollars)	Beginning Balance as of January 1, 2010			Included in Earnings			Included in Regulatory Assets and Liabilities			Purchases		Issuances		Sales			Settlements			Transfer In/Out of Level 3		Ending Balance as of June 30, 2010
Con Edison
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(59	)	$	(34	)	$	(40	)	$	3	$	—	$	(3	)	$	14		$	18	$	(101	)
Interest rate contract		(11	)		(2	)		(1	)		—		—		—			2			—		(12	)
Other assets(1)		92			—			2			—		—		—			—			—		94
Total	$	22		$	(36	)	$	(39	)	$	3	$	—	$	(3	)	$	16		$	18	$	(19	)
CECONY
Derivatives:
Commodity	$	(5	)	$	(7	)	$	(30	)	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	18	$	(30	)
Other assets(1)		83			—			2			—		—		—			—			—		85
Total	$	78		$	(7	)	$	(28	)	$	1	$	—	$	—		$	(7	)	$	18	$	55

(1) Amounts included in earnings are reported in investment and other income on the consolidated income statement.

XML



Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities

Note I — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging, derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value, unless an exception is available under the accounting rules. Certain qualifying derivative contracts have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts. These contracts are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules.

Energy Price Hedging

Con Edison's subsidiaries hedge market price fluctuations associated with physical purchases and sales of electricity, natural gas, and steam by using derivative instruments including futures, forwards, basis swaps, options, transmission congestion contracts and financial transmission rights contracts. The fair values of these hedges at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - gross	$	(121	)	$	(261	)	$	(75	)	$	(156	)
Impact of netting of cash collateral		100			176			56			104
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - net	$	(21	)	$	(85	)	$	(19	)	$	(52	)

Credit Exposure

The Companies are exposed to credit risk related to transactions entered into primarily for the various energy supply and hedging activities by the Utilities and the competitive energy businesses. The Companies use credit policies to manage this risk, including an established credit approval process, monitoring of counterparty limits, netting provisions within agreements, collateral or prepayment arrangements, credit insurance and credit default swaps.

At June 30, 2011, Con Edison and CECONY had $152 million and $31 million of credit exposure in connection with energy supply and hedging activities, net of collateral, respectively. Con Edison's net credit exposure consisted of $58 million with investment-grade counterparties, $53 million with commodity exchange brokers, $39 million with independent system operators and $2 million with non-investment grade counterparties. CECONY's net credit exposure consisted of $3 million with investment-grade counterparties and $28 million with commodity exchange brokers.

Economic Hedges

The Companies enter into certain derivative instruments that do not qualify or are not designated as hedges under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging. However, management believes these instruments represent economic hedges that mitigate exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices.

The fair values of the Companies' commodity derivatives at June 30, 2011 were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a) Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative Assets
Current	Other current assets	$	134		$	38
Long-term	Other deferred charges and non-current assets		42			22
Total derivative assets		$	176		$	60
Impact of netting			(63	)		(14	)
Net derivative assets		$	113		$	46
Derivative Liabilities
Current	Fair value of derivative liabilities	$	234		$	—
Current	Other current liabilities		—			98
Long-term	Fair value of derivative liabilities		63			37
Total derivative liabilities		$	297		$	135
Impact of netting			(163	)		(70	)
Net derivative liabilities		$	134		$	65

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

The fair values of the Companies' commodity derivatives at December 31, 2010 were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a) Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative Assets
Current	Other current assets	$	184		$	29
Long-term	Other deferred charges and non-current assets		51			19
Total derivative assets		$	235		$	48
Impact of netting			(129	)		—
Net derivative assets		$	106		$	48
Derivative Liabilities
Current	Fair value of derivative liabilities	$	385		$	—
Current	Other current liabilities		—			148
Long-term	Fair value of derivative liabilities		111			56
Total derivative liabilities		$	496		$	204
Impact of netting			(305	)		(104	)
Net derivative liabilities		$	191		$	100

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

The Utilities generally recover all of their prudently incurred fuel, purchased power and gas cost, including hedging gains and losses, in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable state utility commissions. See "Recoverable Energy Costs" in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In accordance with the accounting rules for regulated operations, the Utilities record a regulatory asset or liability to defer recognition of unrealized gains and losses on their electric and gas derivatives. As gains and losses are realized in future periods, they will be recognized as purchased power, gas and fuel costs in the Companies' consolidated income statements. Con Edison's competitive energy businesses record realized and unrealized gains and losses on their derivative contracts in earnings in the reporting period in which they occur.

The following tables present the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011:

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the three months ended June 30, 2011
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Deferred derivative gains	$	(4	)	$	(4	)
Long-term	Regulatory liabilities		(1	)		—
Total deferred gains		$	(5	)	$	(4	)
Current	Deferred derivative losses	$	25		$	18
Current	Recoverable energy costs		(53	)		(39	)
Long-term	Regulatory assets		12			9
Total deferred losses		$	(16	)	$	(12	)
Net deferred losses		$	(21	)	$	(16	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	73	(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		17			—
	Non-utility revenue		7	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	97		$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the three months ended June 30, 2011 Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(12) million and $10 million, respectively.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the six months ended June 30, 2011
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Deferred derivative gains	$	2		$	1
Long-term	Regulatory liabilities		2			2
Total deferred gains		$	4		$	3
Current	Deferred derivative losses	$	69		$	53
Current	Recoverable energy costs		(102	)		(81	)
Long-term	Regulatory assets		28			20
Total deferred losses		$	(5	)	$	(8	)
Net deferred losses		$	(1	)	$	(5	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	52	(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		11			—
	Non-utility revenue		17	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	80		$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the six months ended June 30, 2011, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(25) million and $60 million, respectively.

The following tables present the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Other current liabilities	$	1		$	1
Total deferred gains		$	1		$	1
Current	Other current assets	$	95		$	78
Current	Recoverable energy costs	$	(80	)	$	(67	)
Long term	Regulatory assets	$	51		$	38
Total deferred losses		$	66		$	49
Net deferred losses		$	67		$	50
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	(43	)(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		(11	)		—
	Non-utility revenue		2	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	(52	)	$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the three months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $(45) million and $110 million, respectively.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Other current liabilities	$	(5	)	$	(5	)
Total deferred gains		$	(5	)	$	(5	)
Current	Other current assets	$	(66	)	$	(60	)
Current	Recoverable energy costs	$	(135	)	$	(109	)
Long term	Regulatory assets	$	(23	)	$	(18	)
Total deferred losses		$	(224	)	$	(187	)
Net deferred losses		$	(229	)	$	(192	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	(106	)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		(6	)		—
	Non-utility revenue		17	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	(95	)	$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the six months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $2 million.

As of June 30, 2011, Con Edison had 1,705 contracts, including 699 CECONY contracts, which were considered to be derivatives under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging (excluding qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts). The following table presents the number of contracts by commodity type:

	Electric Derivatives								Gas Derivatives
	Number of Energy Contracts(a)		MWHs(b)		Number of Capacity Contracts(a)		MWs(b)		Number of Contracts(a)		Dths(b)		Total Number Of Contracts(a)
Con Edison		882		20,318,546		56		9,161		767		106,730,705		1,705
CECONY		177		4,966,000		—		—		522		97,880,000		699

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) Volumes are reported net of long and short positions.

The Companies also enter into electric congestion and gas basis swap contracts to hedge the congestion and transportation charges which are associated with electric and gas contracts and hedged volumes.

The collateral requirements associated with, and settlement of, derivative transactions are included in net cash flows from operating activities in the Companies' consolidated statement of cash flows. Most derivative instrument contracts contain provisions that may require the Companies to provide collateral on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The amount of collateral to be provided will depend on the fair value of the derivative instruments and the Companies' credit ratings.

The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position and collateral posted at June 30, 2011, and the additional collateral that would have been required to be posted had the lowest applicable credit rating been reduced one level and to below investment grade were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison(a)			CECONY(a)
Aggregate fair value – net liabilities	$	140		$	77
Collateral posted	$	40		$	31	(b)
Additional collateral(c) (downgrade one level from current ratings(d))	$	29		$	25
Additional collateral(c) (downgrade to below investment grade from current ratings(d))	$	149	(e)	$	66	(e)

(a) Non-derivative transactions for the purchase and sale of electricity and gas and qualifying derivative instruments, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales, are excluded from the table. These transactions primarily include purchases of electricity from independent system operators. In the event the Utilities and Con Edison's competitive energy businesses were no longer extended unsecured credit for such purchases, the Companies would be required to post collateral, which at June 30, 2011, would have amounted to an estimated $161 million for Con Edison, including $52 million for CECONY. For certain other such non-derivative transactions, the Companies could be required to post collateral under certain circumstances, including in the event counterparties had reasonable grounds for insecurity.

(b) Across the Utilities' energy derivative positions, credit limits for the same counterparties are generally integrated. At June 30, 2011, the Utilities posted combined collateral of $39 million, including an estimated $8 million attributable to O&R.

(c) The Companies measure the collateral requirements by taking into consideration the fair value amounts of derivative instruments that contain credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liabilities position plus amounts owed to counterparties for settled transactions and amounts required by counterparties for minimum financial security. The fair value amounts represent unrealized losses, net of any unrealized gains where the Companies have a legally enforceable right of setoff.

(d) The current ratings are Moody's, S&P and Fitch long-term credit rating of, as applicable, Con Edison (Baa1/BBB+/BBB+), CECONY (A3/A-/A-) or O&R (Baa1/A-/A-). Credit ratings assigned by rating agencies are expressions of opinions that are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency.

(e) Derivative instruments that are net assets have been excluded from the table. At June 30, 2011, if Con Edison had been downgraded to below investment grade, it would have been required to post additional collateral for such derivative instruments of an estimated $24 million.

Interest Rate Swap

O&R has an interest rate swap pursuant to which it pays a fixed-rate of 6.09 percent and receives a LIBOR-based variable rate. The fair value of this interest rate swap at June 30, 2011 was an unrealized loss of $10 million, which has been included in Con Edison's consolidated balance sheet as a noncurrent liability/fair value of derivative liabilities and a regulatory asset. The change in the fair value of the swap for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was not material. In the event O&R's credit rating was downgraded to BBB- or lower by S&P or Baa3 or lower by Moody's, the swap counterparty could elect to terminate the agreement and, if it did so, the parties would then be required to settle the transaction.

CECONY [Member]

Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities

Note I — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging, derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value, unless an exception is available under the accounting rules. Certain qualifying derivative contracts have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts. These contracts are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules.

Energy Price Hedging

Con Edison's subsidiaries hedge market price fluctuations associated with physical purchases and sales of electricity, natural gas, and steam by using derivative instruments including futures, forwards, basis swaps, options, transmission congestion contracts and financial transmission rights contracts. The fair values of these hedges at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were as follows:

	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - gross	$	(121	)	$	(261	)	$	(75	)	$	(156	)
Impact of netting of cash collateral		100			176			56			104
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - net	$	(21	)	$	(85	)	$	(19	)	$	(52	)

Credit Exposure

The Companies are exposed to credit risk related to transactions entered into primarily for the various energy supply and hedging activities by the Utilities and the competitive energy businesses. The Companies use credit policies to manage this risk, including an established credit approval process, monitoring of counterparty limits, netting provisions within agreements, collateral or prepayment arrangements, credit insurance and credit default swaps.

At June 30, 2011, Con Edison and CECONY had $152 million and $31 million of credit exposure in connection with energy supply and hedging activities, net of collateral, respectively. Con Edison's net credit exposure consisted of $58 million with investment-grade counterparties, $53 million with commodity exchange brokers, $39 million with independent system operators and $2 million with non-investment grade counterparties. CECONY's net credit exposure consisted of $3 million with investment-grade counterparties and $28 million with commodity exchange brokers.

Economic Hedges

The Companies enter into certain derivative instruments that do not qualify or are not designated as hedges under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging. However, management believes these instruments represent economic hedges that mitigate exposure to fluctuations in commodity prices.

The fair values of the Companies' commodity derivatives at June 30, 2011 were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a) Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative Assets
Current	Other current assets	$	134		$	38
Long-term	Other deferred charges and non-current assets		42			22
Total derivative assets		$	176		$	60
Impact of netting			(63	)		(14	)
Net derivative assets		$	113		$	46
Derivative Liabilities
Current	Fair value of derivative liabilities	$	234		$	—
Current	Other current liabilities		—			98
Long-term	Fair value of derivative liabilities		63			37
Total derivative liabilities		$	297		$	135
Impact of netting			(163	)		(70	)
Net derivative liabilities		$	134		$	65

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

The fair values of the Companies' commodity derivatives at December 31, 2010 were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a) Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative Assets
Current	Other current assets	$	184		$	29
Long-term	Other deferred charges and non-current assets		51			19
Total derivative assets		$	235		$	48
Impact of netting			(129	)		—
Net derivative assets		$	106		$	48
Derivative Liabilities
Current	Fair value of derivative liabilities	$	385		$	—
Current	Other current liabilities		—			148
Long-term	Fair value of derivative liabilities		111			56
Total derivative liabilities		$	496		$	204
Impact of netting			(305	)		(104	)
Net derivative liabilities		$	191		$	100

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

The Utilities generally recover all of their prudently incurred fuel, purchased power and gas cost, including hedging gains and losses, in accordance with rate provisions approved by the applicable state utility commissions. See "Recoverable Energy Costs" in Note A to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. In accordance with the accounting rules for regulated operations, the Utilities record a regulatory asset or liability to defer recognition of unrealized gains and losses on their electric and gas derivatives. As gains and losses are realized in future periods, they will be recognized as purchased power, gas and fuel costs in the Companies' consolidated income statements. Con Edison's competitive energy businesses record realized and unrealized gains and losses on their derivative contracts in earnings in the reporting period in which they occur.

The following tables present the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011:

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the three months ended June 30, 2011
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Deferred derivative gains	$	(4	)	$	(4	)
Long-term	Regulatory liabilities		(1	)		—
Total deferred gains		$	(5	)	$	(4	)
Current	Deferred derivative losses	$	25		$	18
Current	Recoverable energy costs		(53	)		(39	)
Long-term	Regulatory assets		12			9
Total deferred losses		$	(16	)	$	(12	)
Net deferred losses		$	(21	)	$	(16	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	73	(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		17			—
	Non-utility revenue		7	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	97		$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the three months ended June 30, 2011 Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(12) million and $10 million, respectively.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the six months ended June 30, 2011
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Deferred derivative gains	$	2		$	1
Long-term	Regulatory liabilities		2			2
Total deferred gains		$	4		$	3
Current	Deferred derivative losses	$	69		$	53
Current	Recoverable energy costs		(102	)		(81	)
Long-term	Regulatory assets		28			20
Total deferred losses		$	(5	)	$	(8	)
Net deferred losses		$	(1	)	$	(5	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	52	(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		11			—
	Non-utility revenue		17	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	80		$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the six months ended June 30, 2011, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(25) million and $60 million, respectively.

The following tables present the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Other current liabilities	$	1		$	1
Total deferred gains		$	1		$	1
Current	Other current assets	$	95		$	78
Current	Recoverable energy costs	$	(80	)	$	(67	)
Long term	Regulatory assets	$	51		$	38
Total deferred losses		$	66		$	49
Net deferred losses		$	67		$	50
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	(43	)(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		(11	)		—
	Non-utility revenue		2	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	(52	)	$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the three months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $(45) million and $110 million, respectively.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Other current liabilities	$	(5	)	$	(5	)
Total deferred gains		$	(5	)	$	(5	)
Current	Other current assets	$	(66	)	$	(60	)
Current	Recoverable energy costs	$	(135	)	$	(109	)
Long term	Regulatory assets	$	(23	)	$	(18	)
Total deferred losses		$	(224	)	$	(187	)
Net deferred losses		$	(229	)	$	(192	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	(106	)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		(6	)		—
	Non-utility revenue		17	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	(95	)	$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the six months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $2 million.

As of June 30, 2011, Con Edison had 1,705 contracts, including 699 CECONY contracts, which were considered to be derivatives under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging (excluding qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts). The following table presents the number of contracts by commodity type:

	Electric Derivatives								Gas Derivatives
	Number of Energy Contracts(a)		MWHs(b)		Number of Capacity Contracts(a)		MWs(b)		Number of Contracts(a)		Dths(b)		Total Number Of Contracts(a)
Con Edison		882		20,318,546		56		9,161		767		106,730,705		1,705
CECONY		177		4,966,000		—		—		522		97,880,000		699

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) Volumes are reported net of long and short positions.

The Companies also enter into electric congestion and gas basis swap contracts to hedge the congestion and transportation charges which are associated with electric and gas contracts and hedged volumes.

The collateral requirements associated with, and settlement of, derivative transactions are included in net cash flows from operating activities in the Companies' consolidated statement of cash flows. Most derivative instrument contracts contain provisions that may require the Companies to provide collateral on derivative instruments in net liability positions. The amount of collateral to be provided will depend on the fair value of the derivative instruments and the Companies' credit ratings.

The aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liability position and collateral posted at June 30, 2011, and the additional collateral that would have been required to be posted had the lowest applicable credit rating been reduced one level and to below investment grade were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison(a)			CECONY(a)
Aggregate fair value – net liabilities	$	140		$	77
Collateral posted	$	40		$	31	(b)
Additional collateral(c) (downgrade one level from current ratings(d))	$	29		$	25
Additional collateral(c) (downgrade to below investment grade from current ratings(d))	$	149	(e)	$	66	(e)

(a) Non-derivative transactions for the purchase and sale of electricity and gas and qualifying derivative instruments, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales, are excluded from the table. These transactions primarily include purchases of electricity from independent system operators. In the event the Utilities and Con Edison's competitive energy businesses were no longer extended unsecured credit for such purchases, the Companies would be required to post collateral, which at June 30, 2011, would have amounted to an estimated $161 million for Con Edison, including $52 million for CECONY. For certain other such non-derivative transactions, the Companies could be required to post collateral under certain circumstances, including in the event counterparties had reasonable grounds for insecurity.

(b) Across the Utilities' energy derivative positions, credit limits for the same counterparties are generally integrated. At June 30, 2011, the Utilities posted combined collateral of $39 million, including an estimated $8 million attributable to O&R.

(c) The Companies measure the collateral requirements by taking into consideration the fair value amounts of derivative instruments that contain credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liabilities position plus amounts owed to counterparties for settled transactions and amounts required by counterparties for minimum financial security. The fair value amounts represent unrealized losses, net of any unrealized gains where the Companies have a legally enforceable right of setoff.

(d) The current ratings are Moody's, S&P and Fitch long-term credit rating of, as applicable, Con Edison (Baa1/BBB+/BBB+), CECONY (A3/A-/A-) or O&R (Baa1/A-/A-). Credit ratings assigned by rating agencies are expressions of opinions that are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency.

(e) Derivative instruments that are net assets have been excluded from the table. At June 30, 2011, if Con Edison had been downgraded to below investment grade, it would have been required to post additional collateral for such derivative instruments of an estimated $24 million.

Interest Rate Swap

O&R has an interest rate swap pursuant to which it pays a fixed-rate of 6.09 percent and receives a LIBOR-based variable rate. The fair value of this interest rate swap at June 30, 2011 was an unrealized loss of $10 million, which has been included in Con Edison's consolidated balance sheet as a noncurrent liability/fair value of derivative liabilities and a regulatory asset. The change in the fair value of the swap for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 was not material. In the event O&R's credit rating was downgraded to BBB- or lower by S&P or Baa3 or lower by Moody's, the swap counterparty could elect to terminate the agreement and, if it did so, the parties would then be required to settle the transaction.

XML



Regulatory Matters

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Regulatory Matters

Note B — Regulatory Matters

Reference is made to "Accounting Policies" in Note A and "Rate Agreements" in Note B to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note B to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

Rate Agreements

O&R — Electric

In June 2011, the NYSPSC adopted an order granting O&R an electric rate increase, effective July 1, 2011, of $26.6 million. The NYSPSC ruling reflects the following major items:

• a weighted average cost of capital of 7.22 percent, reflecting:

• a return on common equity of 9.2 percent, assuming achievement by the company of $825,000 of austerity measures;

• cost of long-term debt of 5.50 percent; and

• common equity ratio of 48 percent.

• continuation of a revenue decoupling mechanism;

• a provision for reconciliation of certain differences in actual average net utility plant to the amount reflected in rates ($718 million) and continuation of rate provisions under which pension and other post-retirement benefit expenses, environmental remediation expenses, tax-exempt debt costs and certain other expenses are reconciled to amounts for those expenses reflected in rates;

• continuation of the rate provisions pursuant to which the company recovers its purchased power costs from customers;

• discontinuation of the provisions under which property taxes were reconciled to amounts reflected in rates;

• discontinuation of the inclusion in rates of funding for the company's annual incentive plan for non-officer management employees;

• continuation of provisions for potential operations penalties of up to $3 million annually if certain customer service and system reliability performance targets are not met; and

• O&R is directed to produce a report detailing its implementation plans for the recommendations made in connection with the NYSPSC's management audit of CECONY, with a forecast of costs to achieve and expected savings. (See "Rate Agreements – Other Regulatory Matters" in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.)

On July 29, 2011, O&R filed a request with the NYSPSC for an increase in the rates it charges for electric service rendered in New York, effective July 1, 2012, of $17.7 million. The filing reflects a return on common equity of 10.75 percent and a common equity ratio of 49.4 percent. Among other things, the filing proposes continuation of the current provisions with respect to recovery from customers of the cost of purchased power and with respect to the deferral of differences between actual expenses allocable to the electric business for pensions and other postretirement benefits, environmental, and research and developmental costs to the amounts for such costs reflected in electric rates. The filing also includes an alternative proposal for a three-year electric rate plan with annual rate increases of $17.6 million effective July 2012, 2013 and 2014. The multi-year filing reflects a return on common equity of 11.25 percent.

Other Regulatory Matters

In February 2009, the NYSPSC commenced a proceeding to examine the prudence of certain CECONY expenditures (see "Investigations of Vendor Payments" in Note G). Pursuant to NYSPSC orders, a portion of the company's revenues (currently, $249 million, $32 million and $6 million on an annual basis for electric, gas and steam service, respectively) is being collected subject to potential refund to customers. At June 30, 2011, the company had collected an estimated $681 million from customers subject to potential refund in connection with this proceeding. In October 2010, a NYSPSC consultant reported its $21 million provisional assessment, which the company has disputed, of potential overcharges for construction work. The potential overcharges related to transactions that involved certain employees who were arrested and a contractor that performed work for the company. The NYSPSC's consultant is expected to continue to review the company's expenditures. At June 30, 2011, the company had a $10.5 million regulatory liability relating to this matter. The company is unable to estimate the amount, if any, by which any refund required by the NYSPSC may exceed this regulatory liability.

In February 2011, the NYSPSC initiated a proceeding to examine the existing mechanisms pursuant to which utilities recover site investigation and remediation costs and possible alternatives. See Note G to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note F to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

Regulatory assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were comprised of the following items:

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Regulatory assets
Unrecognized pension and other postretirement costs	$	3,921	$	4,371	$	3,728	$	4,152
Future federal income tax		1,730		1,593		1,659		1,515
Environmental remediation costs		684		695		566		574
Pension and other post retirement benefits deferrals		183		138		140		90
Revenue taxes		155		145		150		140
Net electric deferrals		130		156		129		156
Surcharge for New York State Assessment		98		121		91		112
Deferred storm costs		53		57		41		43
O&R transition bond charges		47		48		—		—
Deferred derivative losses – long-term		44		74		28		48
Property tax reconciliation		31		34		19		27
Workers' compensation		28		31		28		31
World Trade Center restoration costs		13		45		13		45
Recoverable energy		—		42		—		42
Other		144		133		135		122
Regulatory assets – long-term		7,261		7,683		6,727		7,097
Deferred derivative losses – current		121		190		98		151
Recoverable energy costs – current		9		13		—		—
Regulatory assets – current		130		203		98		151
Total Regulatory Assets	$	7,391	$	7,886	$	6,825	$	7,248
Regulatory liabilities
Allowance for cost of removal less salvage	$	430	$	422	$	356	$	350
Revenue decoupling mechanism		81		38		81		38
World Trade Center settlement proceeds		62		—		62		—
Carrying charges on T&D net plant		40		28		11		5
Energy efficiency programs		28		19		27		18
New York State tax refund		20		30		20		30
Gain on sale of properties		15		31		15		31
Bonus depreciation		13		1		12		1
Expenditure prudence proceeding		11		—		11		—
Other		166		121		156		112
Regulatory liabilities		866		690		751		585
Net unbilled revenue deferrals – current		117		136		117		136
Refundable energy cost – current		75		117		50		90
Deferred derivative gains – current		6		4		4		3
Regulatory liabilities – current		198		257		171		229
Total Regulatory Liabilities	$	1,064	$	947	$	922	$	814

CECONY [Member]

Regulatory Matters

Note B — Regulatory Matters

Reference is made to "Accounting Policies" in Note A and "Rate Agreements" in Note B to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note B to the financial statements in Part I, Item 1 of the First Quarter Form 10-Q.

Rate Agreements

O&R — Electric

In June 2011, the NYSPSC adopted an order granting O&R an electric rate increase, effective July 1, 2011, of $26.6 million. The NYSPSC ruling reflects the following major items:

• a weighted average cost of capital of 7.22 percent, reflecting:

• a return on common equity of 9.2 percent, assuming achievement by the company of $825,000 of austerity measures;

• cost of long-term debt of 5.50 percent; and

• common equity ratio of 48 percent.

• continuation of a revenue decoupling mechanism;

• a provision for reconciliation of certain differences in actual average net utility plant to the amount reflected in rates ($718 million) and continuation of rate provisions under which pension and other post-retirement benefit expenses, environmental remediation expenses, tax-exempt debt costs and certain other expenses are reconciled to amounts for those expenses reflected in rates;

• continuation of the rate provisions pursuant to which the company recovers its purchased power costs from customers;

• discontinuation of the provisions under which property taxes were reconciled to amounts reflected in rates;

• discontinuation of the inclusion in rates of funding for the company's annual incentive plan for non-officer management employees;

• continuation of provisions for potential operations penalties of up to $3 million annually if certain customer service and system reliability performance targets are not met; and

• O&R is directed to produce a report detailing its implementation plans for the recommendations made in connection with the NYSPSC's management audit of CECONY, with a forecast of costs to achieve and expected savings. (See "Rate Agreements – Other Regulatory Matters" in Note B to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.)

On July 29, 2011, O&R filed a request with the NYSPSC for an increase in the rates it charges for electric service rendered in New York, effective July 1, 2012, of $17.7 million. The filing reflects a return on common equity of 10.75 percent and a common equity ratio of 49.4 percent. Among other things, the filing proposes continuation of the current provisions with respect to recovery from customers of the cost of purchased power and with respect to the deferral of differences between actual expenses allocable to the electric business for pensions and other postretirement benefits, environmental, and research and developmental costs to the amounts for such costs reflected in electric rates. The filing also includes an alternative proposal for a three-year electric rate plan with annual rate increases of $17.6 million effective July 2012, 2013 and 2014. The multi-year filing reflects a return on common equity of 11.25 percent.

Other Regulatory Matters

In February 2009, the NYSPSC commenced a proceeding to examine the prudence of certain CECONY expenditures (see "Investigations of Vendor Payments" in Note G). Pursuant to NYSPSC orders, a portion of the company's revenues (currently, $249 million, $32 million and $6 million on an annual basis for electric, gas and steam service, respectively) is being collected subject to potential refund to customers. At June 30, 2011, the company had collected an estimated $681 million from customers subject to potential refund in connection with this proceeding. In October 2010, a NYSPSC consultant reported its $21 million provisional assessment, which the company has disputed, of potential overcharges for construction work. The potential overcharges related to transactions that involved certain employees who were arrested and a contractor that performed work for the company. The NYSPSC's consultant is expected to continue to review the company's expenditures. At June 30, 2011, the company had a $10.5 million regulatory liability relating to this matter. The company is unable to estimate the amount, if any, by which any refund required by the NYSPSC may exceed this regulatory liability.

In February 2011, the NYSPSC initiated a proceeding to examine the existing mechanisms pursuant to which utilities recover site investigation and remediation costs and possible alternatives. See Note G to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K and Note F to the Second Quarter Financial Statements.

Regulatory Assets and Liabilities

Regulatory assets and liabilities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 were comprised of the following items:

	Con Edison				CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Regulatory assets
Unrecognized pension and other postretirement costs	$	3,921	$	4,371	$	3,728	$	4,152
Future federal income tax		1,730		1,593		1,659		1,515
Environmental remediation costs		684		695		566		574
Pension and other post retirement benefits deferrals		183		138		140		90
Revenue taxes		155		145		150		140
Net electric deferrals		130		156		129		156
Surcharge for New York State Assessment		98		121		91		112
Deferred storm costs		53		57		41		43
O&R transition bond charges		47		48		—		—
Deferred derivative losses – long-term		44		74		28		48
Property tax reconciliation		31		34		19		27
Workers' compensation		28		31		28		31
World Trade Center restoration costs		13		45		13		45
Recoverable energy		—		42		—		42
Other		144		133		135		122
Regulatory assets – long-term		7,261		7,683		6,727		7,097
Deferred derivative losses – current		121		190		98		151
Recoverable energy costs – current		9		13		—		—
Regulatory assets – current		130		203		98		151
Total Regulatory Assets	$	7,391	$	7,886	$	6,825	$	7,248
Regulatory liabilities
Allowance for cost of removal less salvage	$	430	$	422	$	356	$	350
Revenue decoupling mechanism		81		38		81		38
World Trade Center settlement proceeds		62		—		62		—
Carrying charges on T&D net plant		40		28		11		5
Energy efficiency programs		28		19		27		18
New York State tax refund		20		30		20		30
Gain on sale of properties		15		31		15		31
Bonus depreciation		13		1		12		1
Expenditure prudence proceeding		11		—		11		—
Other		166		121		156		112
Regulatory liabilities		866		690		751		585
Net unbilled revenue deferrals – current		117		136		117		136
Refundable energy cost – current		75		117		50		90
Deferred derivative gains – current		6		4		4		3
Regulatory liabilities – current		198		257		171		229
Total Regulatory Liabilities	$	1,064	$	947	$	922	$	814

XML



Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Policy)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

Earnings Per Common Share

Earnings Per Common Share

Reference is made to "Earnings Per Common Share" in Note A to the financial statements included in Item 8 of the Form 10-K. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, Con Edison's basic and diluted EPS for Con Edison are calculated as follows:

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Millions of Dollars, except per share amounts/Shares in Millions)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income for common stock	$	165	$	183	$	477	$	409
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic		292.7		282.0		292.3		281.7
Add: Incremental shares attributable to effect of potentially dilutive securities		1.6		1.5		1.6		1.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted		294.3		283.5		293.9		283.2
Net income for common stock per common share – basic	$	0.57	$	0.65	$	1.63	$	1.45
Net income for common stock per common share – diluted	$	0.56	$	0.64	$	1.62	$	1.44

XML



Other Material Contingencies (Narrative) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Lease in lease out total investment	$ 259
Lease in lease out total financed by equity	93
Lease in lease out total financed by long-term debt	166
The company's investment in leverage leases	(48)	(41)
Gross investment in leverage leases	234	235
Deferred tax liabilities	282	276
Tax savings from lease in lease out transactions	229
Guarantee obligations maximum exposure	834	859
Tax Deficiency Paid in December 2005 [Member]
Tax deficiency paid to IRS	0.3
Interest in April 2006 [Member]
Interest paid related to tax deficiency	0.2
Interest up to March 2011 [Member]
Interest paid related to tax deficiency	82.0
Disallowance of Tax 1998-2007 [Member]
Disallowed deduction	416
Disallowance of Tax 2009 [Member]
Disallowed deduction	41
Disallowance of Tax 2008 [Member]
Disallowed deduction	$ 42

XML



Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities

Energy Price Hedging Fair Values

	Con Edison						CECONY
(Millions of Dollars)	2011			2010			2011			2010
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - gross	$	(121	)	$	(261	)	$	(75	)	$	(156	)
Impact of netting of cash collateral		100			176			56			104
Fair value of net derivative assets/(liabilities) - net	$	(21	)	$	(85	)	$	(19	)	$	(52	)

Fair Values Of The Companies' Commodity Derivatives

The fair values of the Companies' commodity derivatives at June 30, 2011 were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a) Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative Assets
Current	Other current assets	$	134		$	38
Long-term	Other deferred charges and non-current assets		42			22
Total derivative assets		$	176		$	60
Impact of netting			(63	)		(14	)
Net derivative assets		$	113		$	46
Derivative Liabilities
Current	Fair value of derivative liabilities	$	234		$	—
Current	Other current liabilities		—			98
Long-term	Fair value of derivative liabilities		63			37
Total derivative liabilities		$	297		$	135
Impact of netting			(163	)		(70	)
Net derivative liabilities		$	134		$	65

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

The fair values of the Companies' commodity derivatives at December 31, 2010 were:

(Millions of Dollars)	Fair Value of Commodity Derivatives(a) Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Derivative Assets
Current	Other current assets	$	184		$	29
Long-term	Other deferred charges and non-current assets		51			19
Total derivative assets		$	235		$	48
Impact of netting			(129	)		—
Net derivative assets		$	106		$	48
Derivative Liabilities
Current	Fair value of derivative liabilities	$	385		$	—
Current	Other current liabilities		—			148
Long-term	Fair value of derivative liabilities		111			56
Total derivative liabilities		$	496		$	204
Impact of netting			(305	)		(104	)
Net derivative liabilities		$	191		$	100

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

Changes In The Fair Values Of Commodity Derivatives

The following tables present the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2011:

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the three months ended June 30, 2011
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Deferred derivative gains	$	(4	)	$	(4	)
Long-term	Regulatory liabilities		(1	)		—
Total deferred gains		$	(5	)	$	(4	)
Current	Deferred derivative losses	$	25		$	18
Current	Recoverable energy costs		(53	)		(39	)
Long-term	Regulatory assets		12			9
Total deferred losses		$	(16	)	$	(12	)
Net deferred losses		$	(21	)	$	(16	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	73	(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		17			—
	Non-utility revenue		7	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	97		$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the three months ended June 30, 2011 Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(12) million and $10 million, respectively.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the six months ended June 30, 2011
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Deferred derivative gains	$	2		$	1
Long-term	Regulatory liabilities		2			2
Total deferred gains		$	4		$	3
Current	Deferred derivative losses	$	69		$	53
Current	Recoverable energy costs		(102	)		(81	)
Long-term	Regulatory assets		28			20
Total deferred losses		$	(5	)	$	(8	)
Net deferred losses		$	(1	)	$	(5	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	52	(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		11			—
	Non-utility revenue		17	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	80		$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the six months ended June 30, 2011, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(25) million and $60 million, respectively.

The following tables present the changes in the fair values of commodity derivatives that have been deferred or recognized in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010:

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Three Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Other current liabilities	$	1		$	1
Total deferred gains		$	1		$	1
Current	Other current assets	$	95		$	78
Current	Recoverable energy costs	$	(80	)	$	(67	)
Long term	Regulatory assets	$	51		$	38
Total deferred losses		$	66		$	49
Net deferred losses		$	67		$	50
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	(43	)(b)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		(11	)		—
	Non-utility revenue		2	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	(52	)	$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the three months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $(45) million and $110 million, respectively.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/(Losses) on Commodity Derivatives(a) Deferred or Recognized in Income for the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
(Millions of Dollars)	Balance Sheet Location	Con Edison			CECONY
Pre-tax gains/(losses) deferred in accordance with accounting rules for regulated operations:
Current	Other current liabilities	$	(5	)	$	(5	)
Total deferred gains		$	(5	)	$	(5	)
Current	Other current assets	$	(66	)	$	(60	)
Current	Recoverable energy costs	$	(135	)	$	(109	)
Long term	Regulatory assets	$	(23	)	$	(18	)
Total deferred losses		$	(224	)	$	(187	)
Net deferred losses		$	(229	)	$	(192	)
	Income Statement Location
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income
	Purchased power expense	$	(106	)	$	—
	Gas purchased for resale		(6	)		—
	Non-utility revenue		17	(b)		—
Total pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income		$	(95	)	$	—

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) For the six months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $2 million.

Number Of Derivative Contracts By Commodity Type

	Electric Derivatives								Gas Derivatives
	Number of Energy Contracts(a)		MWHs(b)		Number of Capacity Contracts(a)		MWs(b)		Number of Contracts(a)		Dths(b)		Total Number Of Contracts(a)
Con Edison		882		20,318,546		56		9,161		767		106,730,705		1,705
CECONY		177		4,966,000		—		—		522		97,880,000		699

(a) Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

(b) Volumes are reported net of long and short positions.

Aggregate Fair Value Of All Derivative Instruments With Credit Risk Related Contingent Features

(Millions of Dollars)	Con Edison(a)			CECONY(a)
Aggregate fair value – net liabilities	$	140		$	77
Collateral posted	$	40		$	31	(b)
Additional collateral(c) (downgrade one level from current ratings(d))	$	29		$	25
Additional collateral(c) (downgrade to below investment grade from current ratings(d))	$	149	(e)	$	66	(e)

(a) Non-derivative transactions for the purchase and sale of electricity and gas and qualifying derivative instruments, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales, are excluded from the table. These transactions primarily include purchases of electricity from independent system operators. In the event the Utilities and Con Edison's competitive energy businesses were no longer extended unsecured credit for such purchases, the Companies would be required to post collateral, which at June 30, 2011, would have amounted to an estimated $161 million for Con Edison, including $52 million for CECONY. For certain other such non-derivative transactions, the Companies could be required to post collateral under certain circumstances, including in the event counterparties had reasonable grounds for insecurity.

(b) Across the Utilities' energy derivative positions, credit limits for the same counterparties are generally integrated. At June 30, 2011, the Utilities posted combined collateral of $39 million, including an estimated $8 million attributable to O&R.

(c) The Companies measure the collateral requirements by taking into consideration the fair value amounts of derivative instruments that contain credit-risk-related contingent features that are in a net liabilities position plus amounts owed to counterparties for settled transactions and amounts required by counterparties for minimum financial security. The fair value amounts represent unrealized losses, net of any unrealized gains where the Companies have a legally enforceable right of setoff.

(d) The current ratings are Moody's, S&P and Fitch long-term credit rating of, as applicable, Con Edison (Baa1/BBB+/BBB+), CECONY (A3/A-/A-) or O&R (Baa1/A-/A-). Credit ratings assigned by rating agencies are expressions of opinions that are subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency.

(e) Derivative instruments that are net assets have been excluded from the table. At June 30, 2011, if Con Edison had been downgraded to below investment grade, it would have been required to post additional collateral for such derivative instruments of an estimated $24 million.

XML



Consolidated Balance Sheet (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Millions	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Accounts receivable-customers, allowance for uncollectible accounts	$ 84	$ 76
Other receivables, allowance for uncollectible accounts	9	8
Non-utility property, accumulated depreciation	55	51
Intangible assets, accumulated amortization	3	3
CECONY [Member]
Accounts receivable-customers, allowance for uncollectible accounts	75	68
Other receivables, allowance for uncollectible accounts	8	7
Non-utility property, accumulated depreciation	$ 23	$ 22

XML



Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies (Tables)

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Summary Of Significant Accounting Policies

Earnings Per Common Share

	For the Three Months Ended June 30,				For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(Millions of Dollars, except per share amounts/Shares in Millions)	2011		2010		2011		2010
Net income for common stock	$	165	$	183	$	477	$	409
Weighted average common shares outstanding – Basic		292.7		282.0		292.3		281.7
Add: Incremental shares attributable to effect of potentially dilutive securities		1.6		1.5		1.6		1.5
Adjusted weighted average common shares outstanding – Diluted		294.3		283.5		293.9		283.2
Net income for common stock per common share – basic	$	0.57	$	0.65	$	1.63	$	1.45
Net income for common stock per common share – diluted	$	0.56	$	0.64	$	1.62	$	1.44

XML



Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities (Fair Values Of The Companies' Commodity Derivatives) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Fair value of derivative assets	$ 176	$ 235
Net derivatives asset	113	106
Fair value of derivative liabilities	297	496
Net derivatives liability	134	191
Derivative Asset [Member]
Impact of netting	(63)	(129)
Derivative Asset [Member] | Other Current Assets [Member]
Fair value of derivative assets	134	184
Derivative Asset [Member] | Other Deferred Charges and Non-Current Assets [Member]
Fair value of derivative assets	42	51
Derivative Liability [Member]
Impact of netting	(163)	(305)
Derivative Liability [Member] | Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities, Current [Member]
Fair value of derivative liabilities	234	385
Derivative Liability [Member] | Fair Value of Derivative Liabilities, Long Term [Member]
Fair value of derivative liabilities	$ 63	$ 111

XML



Consolidated Statement Of Comprehensive Income (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Consolidated Statement Of Comprehensive Income
Pension plan liability adjustments, net of taxes of $1 and $3 in 2011 and $1 and $3 in 2010, respectively	$ 1	$ 1	$ 3	$ 3

XML



Other Material Contingencies

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Other Material Contingencies

Note G — Other Material Contingencies

Manhattan Steam Main Rupture

In July 2007, a CECONY steam main located in midtown Manhattan ruptured. It has been reported that one person died and others were injured as a result of the incident. Several buildings in the area were damaged. Debris from the incident included dirt and mud containing asbestos. The response to the incident required the closing of several buildings and streets for various periods. Approximately 100 suits are pending against the company seeking generally unspecified compensatory and, in some cases, punitive damages, for personal injury, property damage and business interruption. The company has not accrued a liability for the suits. The company has notified its insurers of the incident and believes that the policies in force at the time of the incident will cover most of the company's costs, which the company is unable to estimate, but which could be substantial, to satisfy its liability to others in connection with the incident.

Investigations of Vendor Payments

In January 2009, CECONY commenced an internal investigation relating to the arrests of certain employees

and retired employees (all of whom have since pleaded guilty) for accepting kickbacks from contractors that performed construction work for the company. The company has retained a law firm, which has retained an accounting firm, to assist in the company's investigation. The company is providing information to governmental authorities, which consider the company to be a victim of unlawful conduct, in connection with their investigation of the arrested employees and contractors. The company has terminated its employment of the arrested employees and its contracts with the contractors. In February 2009, the NYSPSC commenced a proceeding that, among other things, will examine the prudence of certain of the company's expenditures relating to the arrests and consider whether additional expenditures should also be examined (see "Other Regulatory Matters" in Note B).

CECONY is also investigating the September 2010 arrest of a retired employee (who has since pleaded guilty to participating in a bribery scheme in which the employee received payments from two companies that supplied materials to the company) and the January 2011 arrest of an employee (for accepting kickbacks from an engineering firm that performed work for the company). CECONY has provided information to governmental authorities in connection with their ongoing investigations of these matters.

The company, based upon its evaluation of its internal controls for 2010 and previous years, believes that the controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that its financial statements have been fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Because the company's investigations are ongoing, the company is unable to predict the impact of any of the employees' unlawful conduct on the company's internal controls, business, results of operations or financial position.

Lease In/Lease Out Transactions

In each of 1997 and 1999, Con Edison Development entered into a transaction in which it leased property and then immediately subleased it back to the lessor (termed "Lease In/Lease Out," or LILO transactions). The transactions respectively involve electric generating and gas distribution facilities in the Netherlands, with a total investment of $259 million. The transactions were financed with $93 million of equity and $166 million of non-recourse, long-term debt secured by the underlying assets. In accordance with the accounting rules for leases, Con Edison is accounting for the two LILO transactions as leveraged leases. Accordingly, the company's investment in these leases, net of non-recourse debt, is carried as a single amount in Con Edison's consolidated balance sheet and income is recognized pursuant to a method that incorporates a level rate of return for those years when net investment in the lease is positive, based upon the after-tax cash flows projected at the inception of the leveraged leases. The company's investment in these leveraged leases was $(48) million at June 30, 2011 and $(41) million at December 31, 2010 and is comprised of a $234 million gross investment less $282 million deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2011 and $235 million gross investment less $276 million of deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2010.

On audit of Con Edison's tax return for 1997, the IRS disallowed the tax losses in connection with the 1997 LILO transaction. In December 2005, Con Edison paid a $0.3 million income tax deficiency asserted by the IRS for the tax year 1997 with respect to the 1997 LILO transaction. In April 2006, the company paid interest of $0.2 million associated with the deficiency and commenced an action in the United States Court of Federal Claims, entitled Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. United States, to obtain a refund of this tax payment and interest. A trial was completed in November 2007. In October 2009, the court issued a decision in favor of the company concluding that the 1997 LILO transaction was, in substance, a true lease that possessed economic substance, the loans relating to the lease constituted bona fide indebtedness, and the deductions for the 1997 LILO transactions claimed by the company in its 1997 federal income tax return are allowable. The IRS is entitled to appeal the decision.

In connection with its audit of Con Edison's federal income tax returns for 1998 through 2007, the IRS

disallowed $416 million of net tax deductions taken with respect to both of the LILO transactions for the tax years. Con Edison is pursuing administrative appeals of these audit level disallowances. In connection with its audit of Con Edison's federal income tax returns for 2009 and 2008, the IRS has disallowed $41 million and $42 million, respectively, of net tax deductions taken with respect to both of the LILO transactions. When these audit level disallowances become appealable, Con Edison intends to file an appeal of the disallowances.

Con Edison believes that its LILO transactions have been correctly reported, and has not recorded any reserve with respect to the disallowance of tax losses, or related interest, in connection with its LILO transactions. Con Edison's estimated tax savings, reflected in its financial statements, from the two LILO transactions through June 30, 2011, in the aggregate, was $229 million. If Con Edison were required to repay all or a portion of these amounts, it would also be required to pay interest of up to $82 million net of tax at June 30, 2011.

Pursuant to the accounting rules for leveraged lease transactions, the expected timing of income tax cash flows generated by Con Edison's LILO transactions are required to be reviewed at least annually. If the expected timing of the cash flows is revised, the rate of return and the allocation of income would be recalculated from the inception of the LILO transactions, and the company would be required to recalculate the accounting effect of the LILO transactions, which would result in a charge to earnings that could have a material adverse effect on the company's results of operations.

Guarantees

Con Edison and its subsidiaries enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance primarily to third parties on behalf of their subsidiaries. Maximum amounts guaranteed by Con Edison totaled $834 million and $859 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

A summary, by type (described in Note H to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K) and term, of Con Edison's total guarantees at June 30, 2011

is as follows:

Guarantee Type	0 – 3 years		4 – 10 years		> 10 years		Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Commodity transactions	$	616		8		140	$	764
Intra-company guarantees		15		—		1		16
Other guarantees		40		14		—		54
TOTAL	$	671	$	22	$	141	$	834

CECONY [Member]

Other Material Contingencies

Note G — Other Material Contingencies

Manhattan Steam Main Rupture

In July 2007, a CECONY steam main located in midtown Manhattan ruptured. It has been reported that one person died and others were injured as a result of the incident. Several buildings in the area were damaged. Debris from the incident included dirt and mud containing asbestos. The response to the incident required the closing of several buildings and streets for various periods. Approximately 100 suits are pending against the company seeking generally unspecified compensatory and, in some cases, punitive damages, for personal injury, property damage and business interruption. The company has not accrued a liability for the suits. The company has notified its insurers of the incident and believes that the policies in force at the time of the incident will cover most of the company's costs, which the company is unable to estimate, but which could be substantial, to satisfy its liability to others in connection with the incident.

Investigations of Vendor Payments

In January 2009, CECONY commenced an internal investigation relating to the arrests of certain employees

and retired employees (all of whom have since pleaded guilty) for accepting kickbacks from contractors that performed construction work for the company. The company has retained a law firm, which has retained an accounting firm, to assist in the company's investigation. The company is providing information to governmental authorities, which consider the company to be a victim of unlawful conduct, in connection with their investigation of the arrested employees and contractors. The company has terminated its employment of the arrested employees and its contracts with the contractors. In February 2009, the NYSPSC commenced a proceeding that, among other things, will examine the prudence of certain of the company's expenditures relating to the arrests and consider whether additional expenditures should also be examined (see "Other Regulatory Matters" in Note B).

CECONY is also investigating the September 2010 arrest of a retired employee (who has since pleaded guilty to participating in a bribery scheme in which the employee received payments from two companies that supplied materials to the company) and the January 2011 arrest of an employee (for accepting kickbacks from an engineering firm that performed work for the company). CECONY has provided information to governmental authorities in connection with their ongoing investigations of these matters.

The company, based upon its evaluation of its internal controls for 2010 and previous years, believes that the controls were effective to provide reasonable assurance that its financial statements have been fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Because the company's investigations are ongoing, the company is unable to predict the impact of any of the employees' unlawful conduct on the company's internal controls, business, results of operations or financial position.

Lease In/Lease Out Transactions

In each of 1997 and 1999, Con Edison Development entered into a transaction in which it leased property and then immediately subleased it back to the lessor (termed "Lease In/Lease Out," or LILO transactions). The transactions respectively involve electric generating and gas distribution facilities in the Netherlands, with a total investment of $259 million. The transactions were financed with $93 million of equity and $166 million of non-recourse, long-term debt secured by the underlying assets. In accordance with the accounting rules for leases, Con Edison is accounting for the two LILO transactions as leveraged leases. Accordingly, the company's investment in these leases, net of non-recourse debt, is carried as a single amount in Con Edison's consolidated balance sheet and income is recognized pursuant to a method that incorporates a level rate of return for those years when net investment in the lease is positive, based upon the after-tax cash flows projected at the inception of the leveraged leases. The company's investment in these leveraged leases was $(48) million at June 30, 2011 and $(41) million at December 31, 2010 and is comprised of a $234 million gross investment less $282 million deferred tax liabilities at June 30, 2011 and $235 million gross investment less $276 million of deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2010.

On audit of Con Edison's tax return for 1997, the IRS disallowed the tax losses in connection with the 1997 LILO transaction. In December 2005, Con Edison paid a $0.3 million income tax deficiency asserted by the IRS for the tax year 1997 with respect to the 1997 LILO transaction. In April 2006, the company paid interest of $0.2 million associated with the deficiency and commenced an action in the United States Court of Federal Claims, entitled Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. v. United States, to obtain a refund of this tax payment and interest. A trial was completed in November 2007. In October 2009, the court issued a decision in favor of the company concluding that the 1997 LILO transaction was, in substance, a true lease that possessed economic substance, the loans relating to the lease constituted bona fide indebtedness, and the deductions for the 1997 LILO transactions claimed by the company in its 1997 federal income tax return are allowable. The IRS is entitled to appeal the decision.

In connection with its audit of Con Edison's federal income tax returns for 1998 through 2007, the IRS

disallowed $416 million of net tax deductions taken with respect to both of the LILO transactions for the tax years. Con Edison is pursuing administrative appeals of these audit level disallowances. In connection with its audit of Con Edison's federal income tax returns for 2009 and 2008, the IRS has disallowed $41 million and $42 million, respectively, of net tax deductions taken with respect to both of the LILO transactions. When these audit level disallowances become appealable, Con Edison intends to file an appeal of the disallowances.

Con Edison believes that its LILO transactions have been correctly reported, and has not recorded any reserve with respect to the disallowance of tax losses, or related interest, in connection with its LILO transactions. Con Edison's estimated tax savings, reflected in its financial statements, from the two LILO transactions through June 30, 2011, in the aggregate, was $229 million. If Con Edison were required to repay all or a portion of these amounts, it would also be required to pay interest of up to $82 million net of tax at June 30, 2011.

Pursuant to the accounting rules for leveraged lease transactions, the expected timing of income tax cash flows generated by Con Edison's LILO transactions are required to be reviewed at least annually. If the expected timing of the cash flows is revised, the rate of return and the allocation of income would be recalculated from the inception of the LILO transactions, and the company would be required to recalculate the accounting effect of the LILO transactions, which would result in a charge to earnings that could have a material adverse effect on the company's results of operations.

Guarantees

Con Edison and its subsidiaries enter into various agreements providing financial or performance assurance primarily to third parties on behalf of their subsidiaries. Maximum amounts guaranteed by Con Edison totaled $834 million and $859 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.

A summary, by type (described in Note H to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K) and term, of Con Edison's total guarantees at June 30, 2011

is as follows:

Guarantee Type	0 – 3 years		4 – 10 years		> 10 years		Total
	(Millions of Dollars)
Commodity transactions	$	616		8		140	$	764
Intra-company guarantees		15		—		1		16
Other guarantees		40		14		—		54
TOTAL	$	671	$	22	$	141	$	834

XML



Pension Benefits (Net Periodic Pension Benefit Costs) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Dec. 31, 2011
Companies [Member] | Non-Qualified Supplemental Pension Plans [Member]
Non-qualified supplement pension plan, funded	$ 11		$ 11
Pension Benefits [Member]
Service cost - including administrative expenses	47	42	94	84
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation	140	139	280	278
Expected return on plan assets	(183)	(176)	(366)	(352)
Amortization of net actuarial loss	132	106	264	212
Amortization of prior service cost	2	2	4	4
NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	138	113	276	226
Amortization of regulatory asset	1	1	1	1
TOTAL PERIODIC BENEFIT COST	139	114	277	227
Cost capitalized	(48)	(37)	(96)	(78)
Cost deferred	(6)	(33)	(57)	(56)
Cost charged to operating expenses	85	44	124	93
Estimated future employer contributions					$ 533

XML



New Financial Accounting Standards

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

New Financial Accounting Standards

Note K — New Financial Accounting Standards

Reference is made to Note T to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amendments to the guidance for fair value measurement through Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs". The amendments expand Accounting Standards Codification 820's existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and makes other amendments. Many of these amendments were made to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The application of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the companies' financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance for presentation of comprehensive income through ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income." The amendments require that the comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. The amendments in this update are applicable retrospectively for public entities effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The application of this guidance does not have a material impact on the companies' financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

CECONY [Member]

New Financial Accounting Standards

Note K — New Financial Accounting Standards

Reference is made to Note T to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amendments to the guidance for fair value measurement through Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2011-04, "Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs". The amendments expand Accounting Standards Codification 820's existing disclosure requirements for fair value measurements and makes other amendments. Many of these amendments were made to eliminate unnecessary wording differences between U.S. generally accepted accounting principles and International Financial Reporting Standards. For public entities, the amendments are effective prospectively during interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The application of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact on the companies' financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

In June 2011, the FASB issued new guidance for presentation of comprehensive income through ASU No. 2011-05, "Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Presentation of Comprehensive Income." The amendments require that the comprehensive income be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. In the two-statement approach, the first statement should present total net income and its components followed consecutively by a second statement that should present total other comprehensive income, the components of other comprehensive income, and the total of comprehensive income. The amendments in this update are applicable retrospectively for public entities effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The application of this guidance does not have a material impact on the companies' financial position, results of operations and liquidity.

XML



Consolidated Income Statement (USD $) In Millions, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric	$ 2,153	$ 2,256	$ 4,022	$ 4,145
Gas	333	274	1,088	1,047
Steam	107	89	432	396
Non-utility	400	398	800	890
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES	2,993	3,017	6,342	6,478
OPERATING EXPENSES
Purchased power	1,020	1,140	1,886	2,283
Fuel	68	87	244	237
Gas purchased for resale	111	67	418	410
Other operations and maintenance	732	678	1,429	1,379
Depreciation and amortization	219	211	437	415
Taxes, other than income taxes	445	405	904	833
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES	2,595	2,588	5,318	5,557
OPERATING INCOME	398	429	1,024	921
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
Investment and other income	10	14	19	21
Allowance for equity funds used during construction	2	4	6	9
Other deductions	(7)	(6)	(10)	(9)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)	5	12	15	21
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST AND INCOME TAX EXPENSE	403	441	1,039	942
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on long-term debt	146	148	293	298
Other interest	7	4	14	6
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction	(1)	(3)	(3)	(5)
NET INTEREST EXPENSE	152	149	304	299
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE	251	292	735	643
INCOME TAX EXPENSE	83	106	252	228
NET INCOME	168	186	483	415
Preferred stock dividend requirements of subsidiary	(3)	(3)	(6)	(6)
NET INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK	165	183	477	409
Net income for common stock per common share - basic	$ 0.57	$ 0.65	$ 1.63	$ 1.45
Net income for common stock per common share - diluted	$ 0.56	$ 0.64	$ 1.62	$ 1.44
DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK	$ 0.600	$ 0.595	$ 1.200	$ 1.190
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC (IN MILLIONS)	292.7	282.0	292.3	281.7
AVERAGE NUMBER OF SHARES OUTSTANDING - DILUTED (IN MILLIONS)	294.3	283.5	293.9	283.2
CECONY [Member]
OPERATING REVENUES
Electric	2,013	2,104	3,734	3,832
Gas	296	239	959	922
Steam	107	89	432	396
TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES	2,416	2,432	5,125	5,150
OPERATING EXPENSES
Purchased power	621	787	1,104	1,339
Fuel	68	87	244	237
Gas purchased for resale	92	51	355	345
Other operations and maintenance	631	588	1,227	1,195
Depreciation and amortization	205	196	410	388
Taxes, other than income taxes	429	389	868	800
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES	2,046	2,098	4,208	4,304
OPERATING INCOME	370	334	917	846
OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)
Investment and other income	4	14	9	18
Allowance for equity funds used during construction	2	4	5	8
Other deductions	(6)	(6)	(9)	(9)
TOTAL OTHER INCOME (DEDUCTIONS)		12	5	17
INCOME BEFORE INTEREST AND INCOME TAX EXPENSE	370	346	922	863
INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on long-term debt	131	133	263	268
Other interest	5	5	10	8
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction	(1)	(2)	(3)	(4)
NET INTEREST EXPENSE	135	136	270	272
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX EXPENSE	235	210	652	591
INCOME TAX EXPENSE	75	72	220	207
NET INCOME	160	138	432	384
Preferred stock dividend requirements of subsidiary	(3)	(3)	(6)	(6)
NET INCOME FOR COMMON STOCK	$ 157	$ 135	$ 426	$ 378

XML



Environmental Matters (Accrued Liabilities And Regulatory Assets) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Regulatory assets	$ 7,391	$ 7,886
Manufactured Gas Plant Sites [Member]
Accrual for environmental loss contingencies	434	446
Other Superfund Sites [Member]
Accrual for environmental loss contingencies	68	66
Superfund Sites [Member]
Accrual for environmental loss contingencies	502	512
Regulatory assets	$ 683	$ 692

XML



Fair Value Measurements (Assets And Liabilities Measured At Fair Value On A Recurring Basis) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	6 Months Ended		12 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011		Dec. 31, 2010
Total assets	$ 293		$ 272
Transfer in	5	[1],[2]	(45)	[1],[2],[3]
Transfer out	(5)	[1],[2]	45	[1],[2],[3]
Derivative liabilities	136	[4]	191	[5]
Total liabilities	146		201
Commodity [Member]
Derivative assets	115	[4]	106	[5]
Derivative liabilities	136		191
Commodity [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Derivative assets	1	[4]	2	[5]
Derivative liabilities	4		4
Commodity [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Derivative assets	56	[4]	72	[5]
Derivative liabilities	144		270
Commodity [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Derivative assets	100	[4]	144	[5]
Derivative liabilities	130		205
Commodity [Member] | Netting Adjustments [Member]
Derivative assets	(42)	[4],[6]	(112)	[5],[6]
Derivative liabilities	(142)	[6]	(288)	[6]
Fair Value Interest Rate Contract [Member]
Derivative liabilities	10	[7]	10	[8]
Fair Value Interest Rate Contract [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Derivative liabilities				[8]
Fair Value Interest Rate Contract [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Derivative liabilities				[8]
Fair Value Interest Rate Contract [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Derivative liabilities	10	[7]	10	[8]
Fair Value Interest Rate Contract [Member] | Netting Adjustments [Member]
Derivative liabilities				[6],[8]
Fair Value Other Assets [Member]
Derivative assets	178	[9]	166	[9]
Fair Value Other Assets [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Derivative assets	72	[9]	65	[9]
Fair Value Other Assets [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Derivative assets				[9]
Fair Value Other Assets [Member] | Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Derivative assets	106	[9]	101	[9]
Fair Value Other Assets [Member] | Netting Adjustments [Member]
Derivative assets				[6],[9]
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 1 [Member]
Total assets	73		67
Transfer in	0	[1],[2]		[1],[2],[3]
Transfer out	0	[1],[2]		[1],[2],[3]
Derivative liabilities	4	[4]	4	[5]
Total liabilities	4		4
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 2 [Member]
Total assets	56		72
Transfer in	5	[1],[2]	(36)	[1],[2],[3]
Transfer out			9	[1],[2],[3]
Derivative liabilities	149	[4]	243	[5]
Total liabilities	149		243
Fair Value, Inputs, Level 3 [Member]
Total assets	206		245
Transfer in			(9)	[1],[2],[3]
Transfer out	(5)	[1],[2]	36	[1],[2],[3]
Derivative liabilities	125	[4]	232	[5]
Total liabilities	135		242
Netting Adjustments [Member]
Total assets	(42)	[6]	(112)	[6]
Transfer in				[1],[2],[3],[6]
Transfer out				[1],[2],[3],[6]
Derivative liabilities	(142)	[4],[6]	(288)	[5],[6]
Total liabilities	$ (142)	[6]	$ (288)	[6]

[1] The Companies' policy is to recognize transfers into and transfers out of the levels at the end of the reporting period.

[2] Transferred from Level 3 to Level 2 because of availability of observable market data due to decrease in the terms of certain contracts from beyond one year as of December 31, 2010 to less than one year as of June 30, 2011.

[3] Transferred from Level 2 to Level 3 because of reassessment of the levels in the fair value hierarchy within which certain inputs fall.

[4] A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note I.

[5] A significant portion of the commodity derivative contracts categorized in Level 3 is valued using either an industry acceptable model or an internally developed model with observable inputs. The models also include some less readily observable inputs resulting in the classification of the entire contract as Level 3. See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

[6] Amounts represent the impact of legally-enforceable master netting agreements that allow the Companies to net gain and loss positions and cash collateral held or placed with the same counterparties.

[7] See Note I.

[8] See Note O to the financial statements in Item 8 of the Form 10-K.

[9] Other assets are comprised of assets such as life insurance contracts within the Deferred Income Plan and Supplemental Retirement Income Plans, held in rabbi trusts.

XML



Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities (Changes In The Fair Values Of Commodity Derivatives) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended				6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011		Jun. 30, 2010		Jun. 30, 2011		Jun. 30, 2010
Total deferred gains	$ (5)		$ 1		$ 4		$ (5)
Total deferred losses	(16)		66		(5)		(224)
Net deferred losses	(21)		67		(1)		(229)
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income	97		(52)		80		(95)
Other Current Liabilities [Member]
Current-Deferred derivative gains			1				(5)
Other Current Assets [Member]
Deferred gain/(loss), asset			95				(66)
Deferred Derivative Gains [Member]
Current-Deferred derivative gains	(4)				2
Regulatory Liabilities, Long Term [Member]
Total deferred gains	(1)				2
Deferred Derivative Losses [Member]
Deferred derivative losses, current	25				69
Recoverable Energy Costs [Member]
Deferred gain/(loss), asset	(53)		(80)		(102)		(135)
Regulatory Assets, Long Term [Member]
Deferred gain/(loss), asset	12		51		28		(23)
Purchased Power Expense [Member]
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income	73	[1]	(43)	[2]	52	[3]	(106)
Unrealized gain/(loss) on derivatives, tax	10		110		60
Gas Purchased for Resale [Member]
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income	17		(11)		11		(6)
Non-utility Revenue [Member]
Pre-tax gain/(loss) recognized in income	7	[1]	2	[2]	17	[3]	17	[4]
Unrealized gain/(loss) on derivatives, tax	$ (12)		$ (45)		$ (25)		$ 2

[1] For the three months ended June 30, 2011 Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(12) million and $10 million, respectively.

[2] For the three months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $(45) million and $110 million, respectively.

[3] For the six months ended June 30, 2011, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues and purchased power expense an unrealized pre-tax (loss)/gain of $(25) million and $60 million, respectively.

[4] For the six months ended June 30, 2010, Con Edison recorded in non-utility operating revenues an unrealized pre-tax gain/(loss) of $2 million.

XML



Derivative Instruments And Hedging Activities (Number Of Derivative Contracts By Commodity Type) (Details)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011
Number of Energy Contracts	1,705	[1]
Description of Derivative Activity Volume Electric Derivatives [Member]
Number of Energy Contracts	882	[1]
MWhs	20,318,546	[2]
Number of Capacity Contracts	56	[1]
MWs	9,161	[2]
Description of Derivative Activity Volume Gas Derivatives [Member]
Number of Energy Contracts	767	[1]
Dths	106,730,705	[2]

[1] Qualifying derivative contracts, which have been designated as normal purchases or normal sales contracts, are not reported at fair value under the accounting rules for derivatives and hedging and, therefore, are excluded from the table.

[2] Volumes are reported net of long and short positions.

XML



Environmental Matters (Environmental Remediation Costs) (Details) (USD $) In Millions	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Environmental Matters
Remediation costs incurred	$ 10	$ 14	$ 16	$ 23