10-Q

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended November 28, 2010

OR

o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission File Number: 1-7275

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware	47-0248710
(State or other jurisdiction of	(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)	Identification No.)
One ConAgra Drive, Omaha, Nebraska	68102-5001
(Address of principal executive offices)	(Zip Code)

(402) 240-4000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer þ	Accelerated filer o	Non-accelerated filer o	Smaller reporting company o
	(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ

Number of shares outstanding of issuer’s common stock, as of December 26, 2010, was 435,717,011.

Table of Contents

Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3
Item 1 Financial Statements	3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings for the Thirteen and Twenty-six Weeks ended November 28, 2010 and November 29, 2009	3
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Thirteen and Twenty-six Weeks ended November 28, 2010 and November 29, 2009	4
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of November 28, 2010 and May 30, 2010	5
Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Twenty-six Weeks ended November 28, 2010 and November 29, 2009	6
Notes to Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	8
Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	26
Item 3 Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	36
Item 4 Controls and Procedures	37
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION	38
Item 1 Legal Proceedings	38
Item 2 Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	38
Item 6 Exhibits	38
Signatures	39
Exhibit Index	40
EX-10.1
EX-12
EX-31.1
EX-31.2
EX-32.1
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

2

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings

(in millions except per share amounts)

(unaudited)

	Thirteen weeks ended					Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,		November 29,			November 28,		November 29,
	2010		2009			2010		2009
Net sales	$	3,161.1	$	3,100.1		$	5,978.7	$	5,986.4
Costs and expenses:
Cost of goods sold		2,401.0		2,257.5			4,566.8		4,437.6
Selling, general and administrative expenses		428.4		456.1			838.4		878.0
Interest expense, net		33.7		40.5			71.0		81.9
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings		298.0		346.0			502.5		588.9
Income tax expense		101.4		114.1			168.4		202.9
Equity method investment earnings		4.6		5.9			10.8		14.8
Income from continuing operations		201.2		237.8			344.9		400.8
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax		0.6		1.4			3.2		3.6
Net income	$	201.8	$	239.2		$	348.1	$	404.4
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.9		(0.5	)		0.8		(1.2	)
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.	$	200.9	$	239.7		$	347.3	$	405.6
Earnings per share — basic
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.46	$	0.54		$	0.78	$	0.91
Income from discontinued operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders		—		—			—		—
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.46	$	0.54		$	0.78	$	0.91
Earnings per share — diluted
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.45	$	0.53		$	0.77	$	0.90
Income from discontinued operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders		—		0.01			0.01		0.01
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	0.45	$	0.54		$	0.78	$	0.91
Cash dividends declared per common share	$	0.23	$	0.20		$	0.43	$	0.39

     See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income

(in millions)

(unaudited)

	Thirteen weeks ended					Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,		November 29,			November 28,		November 29,
	2010		2009			2010		2009
Net income	$	201.8	$	239.2		$	348.1	$	404.4
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net derivative adjustment, net of tax		—		0.1			0.1		0.1
Unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities, net of tax:
Unrealized holding gains arising during the period		0.2		0.1			—		—
Currency translation adjustment:
Unrealized translation gains arising during the period		13.1		13.9			18.0		15.1
Pension and postretirement healthcare liabilities, net of tax		1.0		0.2			3.3		(0.6	)
Comprehensive income		216.1		253.5			369.5		419.0
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.9		(0.5	)		0.8		(1.2	)
Comprehensive income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.	$	215.2	$	254.0		$	368.7	$	420.2

     See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

(in millions except share data)

(unaudited)

	November 28,			May 30,
	2010			2010
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents	$	545.2		$	953.2
Receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $7.6 and $8.5		902.5			849.6
Inventories		1,974.3			1,606.5
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		771.8			307.3
Current assets held for sale		—			243.5
Total current assets		4,193.8			3,960.1
Property, plant and equipment		5,581.6			5,402.9
Less accumulated depreciation		(2,915.5	)		(2,777.9	)
Property, plant and equipment, net		2,666.1			2,625.0
Goodwill		3,606.9			3,552.1
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net		932.7			874.8
Other assets		204.0			695.6
Noncurrent assets held for sale		—			30.4
	$	11,603.5		$	11,738.0
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Notes payable	$	0.6		$	0.6
Current installments of long-term debt		356.1			260.2
Accounts payable		1,122.8			919.1
Accrued payroll		123.3			263.9
Other accrued liabilities		677.2			579.0
Current liabilities held for sale		—			13.4
Total current liabilities		2,280.0			2,036.2
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments		2,684.0			3,030.5
Subordinated debt		195.9			195.9
Other noncurrent liabilities		1,491.9			1,541.3
Noncurrent liabilities held for sale		—			5.2
Total liabilities		6,651.8			6,809.1
Commitments and contingencies (Note 14)
Common stockholders’ equity
Common stock of $5 par value, authorized 1,200,000,000 shares; issued 567,907,172 and 567,907,172		2,839.7			2,839.7
Additional paid-in capital		891.8			897.5
Retained earnings		4,576.2			4,417.1
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(263.9	)		(285.3	)
Less treasury stock, at cost, 132,402,055 and 125,637,495 common shares		(3,097.1	)		(2,945.1	)
Total Conagra Foods, Inc. common stockholders’ equity		4,946.7			4,923.9
Noncontrolling interests		5.0			5.0
Total stockholders’ equity		4,951.7			4,928.9
	$	11,603.5		$	11,738.0

     See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(in millions)

(unaudited)

	Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,			November 29,
	2010			2009
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net income	$	348.1		$	404.4
Income from discontinued operations		3.2			3.6
Income from continuing operations		344.9			400.8
Adjustments to reconcile income from continuing operations to net cash flows from operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		175.5			159.5
Impairment charges related to Garner accident		—			19.6
Insurance recoveries recognized related to Garner accident		(1.8	)		(41.0	)
Advances from insurance carriers related to Garner accident		10.9			28.6
Proceeds from settlement of interest rate swaps		31.5			—
Loss on sale of fixed assets		3.0			2.8
Distributions from affiliates greater (less) than current earnings		(2.7	)		3.4
Contributions to pension plans		(112.0	)		(17.1	)
Share-based payments expense		22.7			26.7
Non-cash interest income on payment-in-kind notes		(37.3	)		(39.8	)
Other items		56.2			36.9
Change in operating assets and liabilities before effects of business acquisitions and dispositions:
Accounts receivable		(47.7	)		(71.7	)
Inventory		(353.0	)		(109.4	)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		59.1			28.6
Accounts payable		207.2			130.9
Accrued payroll		(139.9	)		16.3
Other accrued liabilities		99.3			109.4
Net cash flows from operating activities — continuing operations		315.9			684.5
Net cash flows from operating activities — discontinued operations		3.2			(27.3	)
Net cash flows from operating activities		319.1			657.2
Cash flows from investing activities:
Additions to property, plant and equipment		(211.2	)		(239.8	)
Sale of property, plant and equipment		1.5			2.3
Advances from insurance carriers related to Garner accident		13.1			10.6
Purchase of businesses and intangible assets		(136.0	)		(3.0	)
Net cash flows from investing activities — continuing operations		(332.6	)		(229.9	)
Net cash flows from investing activities — discontinued operations		245.7			4.3
Net cash flows from investing activities	$	(86.9	)	$	(225.6	)

6

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(in millions)
(unaudited)

	Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,			November 29,
	2010			2009
Cash flows from financing activities:
Repayment of long-term debt	$	(289.3	)	$	(9.0	)
Repurchase of ConAgra Foods, Inc. common shares		(200.0	)		—
Cash dividends paid		(176.4	)		(169.2	)
Exercise of stock options and issuance of other stock awards		21.6			(11.7	)
Other items		(0.2	)		1.4
Net cash flows from financing activities — continuing operations		(644.3	)		(188.5	)
Net cash flows from financing activities — discontinued operations		(0.1	)		(0.4	)
Net cash flows from financing activities		(644.4	)		(188.9	)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents		4.2			4.3
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(408.0	)		247.0
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		953.2			243.2
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	545.2		$	490.2

     See notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Twenty-six Weeks ended November 28, 2010 and November 29, 2009
(columnar dollars in millions except per share amounts)

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The unaudited financial information reflects all adjustments, which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the results of operations, financial position, and cash flows for the periods presented. The adjustments are of a normal recurring nature, except as otherwise noted. These condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes included in the ConAgra Foods, Inc. (the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2010.

The results of operations for any quarter or a partial fiscal year period are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for other periods or the full fiscal year.

Basis of Consolidation — The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ConAgra Foods, Inc. and all majority-owned subsidiaries. In addition, the accounts of all variable interest entities for which we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary are included in our condensed consolidated financial statements from the date such determination is made. All significant intercompany investments, accounts, and transactions have been eliminated.

Comprehensive Income — Comprehensive income includes net income, currency translation adjustments, certain derivative-related activity, changes in the value of available-for-sale investments, and changes in prior service cost and net actuarial gains (losses) from pension and postretirement health care plans. We generally deem our foreign investments to be essentially permanent in nature and we do not provide for taxes on currency translation adjustments arising from converting the investment denominated in a foreign currency to U.S. dollars. When we determine that a foreign investment, as well as undistributed earnings, are no longer permanent in nature, estimated taxes are provided for the related deferred tax liability (asset), if any, resulting from currency translation adjustments.

The following details the income tax expense on components of other comprehensive income:

	Thirteen weeks ended				Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,		November 29,		November 28,		November 29,
	2010		2009		2010		2009
Net derivative adjustment	$	0.1	$	0.1	$	0.1	$	0.1
Unrealized gains on available-for-sale securities		0.1		0.1		—		—
Pension and postretirement healthcare liabilities		1.4		0.5		2.9		0.7
	$	1.6	$	0.7	$	3.0	$	0.8

Accounting Changes — In June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) amended its guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities. This guidance requires an enterprise to perform an analysis to determine whether the enterprise’s variable interest or interests give it a controlling financial interest in a variable interest entity. This analysis identifies the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity as the enterprise that has both of the following characteristics: the power to direct the activities of a variable interest entity that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses of the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the variable interest entity. We adopted the provisions of this guidance effective as of the beginning of our fiscal 2011. The impact of the adoption of this guidance was not material to our financial statements.

Reclassifications — Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with current year presentation.

Use of Estimates — Preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, and expenses as reflected in the condensed consolidated financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

8

2. DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS AND DIVESTITURES

Discontinued Operations

Gilroy Foods & Flavors^TM

During the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ dehydrated garlic, onion, capsicum and Controlled Moisture™, GardenFrost^®, Redi-Made™, and fresh vegetable operations for $245.7 million in cash. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the discontinued Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ dehydrated vegetable business have been reclassified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our consolidated balance sheet for the period prior to divestiture.

In connection with the sale of this business, we have entered into agreements to purchase certain ingredients from the divested business for a period of five years. The continuing cash flows related to these agreements are not significant, and accordingly, are not deemed to be direct cash flows of the divested business.

Summary of Operational Results

The summary comparative financial results of the discontinued operations were as follows:

	Thirteen weeks ended					Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,			November 29,		November 28,			November 29,
	2010			2009		2010			2009
Net sales	$	—		$	72.6	$	40.7		$	148.9
Operating results from discontinued operations before income taxes		(0.6	)		1.1		4.1			4.7
Gain (loss) from disposal of businesses		(0.5	)		—		0.4			—
Income (loss) before income taxes		(1.1	)		1.1		4.5			4.7
Income tax benefit (expense)		1.7			0.3		(1.3	)		(1.1	)
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax	$	0.6		$	1.4	$	3.2		$	3.6

Operating results from discontinued operations for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011 include the impact of a favorable resolution of a foreign tax matter relating to a discontinued business. Results in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 reflected charges related to certain legal and environmental matters of divested businesses.

The assets and liabilities classified as held for sale as of May 30, 2010 were as follows:

	May 30,
	2010
Receivables, less allowances for doubtful accounts	$	29.0
Inventories		213.3
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		1.2
Current assets held for sale	$	243.5
Property, plant and equipment, net	$	30.4
Noncurrent assets held for sale	$	30.4
Current installments of long-term debt	$	0.9
Accounts payable		9.1
Accrued payroll		0.9
Other accrued liabilities		2.5
Current liabilities held for sale	$	13.4
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments	$	5.2
Noncurrent liabilities held for sale	$	5.2

Other Divestitures

In February 2010, we completed the sale of our Luck’s^® brand for proceeds of $22.0 million in cash, resulting in a pre-tax gain of $14.3 million ($9.0 million after-tax), reflected in selling, general and administrative expenses.

9

3. ACQUISITIONS

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we acquired the assets of American Pie, LLC (“American Pie”) for $131.0 million in cash plus assumed liabilities. American Pie is a manufacturer of frozen fruit pies, thaw and serve pies, fruit cobblers, and pie crusts under the licensed Marie Callender’s^® and Claim Jumper^® trade names, as well as frozen dinners, pot pies, and appetizers under the Claim Jumper^® trade name. Approximately $51.5 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $61.3 million was allocated to brands, trademarks, and other intangibles. The amount allocated to goodwill is deductible for income tax purposes and is primarily attributable to American Pie’s product portfolio, as well as anticipated synergies and other intangibles that do not qualify for separate recognition. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.

In the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we acquired Elan Nutrition, Inc., a privately held formulator and manufacturer of private label snack and nutrition bars, for $103.5 million in cash plus assumed liabilities. Approximately $66.4 million of the purchase price was allocated to goodwill and $33.6 million was allocated to brands, trademarks, and other intangibles. The amount allocated to goodwill is not deductible for income tax purposes and primarily reflects the value of the synergies we expect from the acquisition as well as other intangibles that do not qualify for separate recognition. This business is included in the Consumer Foods segment.

4. PAYMENT-IN-KIND NOTES RECEIVABLE

In connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009, we received $550.0 million (face value) of payment-in-kind debt securities (the “Notes”) issued by the purchaser of the divested business. The Notes were recorded at an initial estimated fair value of $479.4 million.

The Notes were issued in three tranches: $99,990,000 original principal amount of 10.5% notes due June 2010; $200,035,000 original principal amount of 10.75% notes due June 2011; and $249,975,000 original principal amount of 11.0% notes due June 2012. The Notes permitted payment of interest in cash or in additional notes.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we received $115.4 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the first tranche of the Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity date. On December 6, 2010, subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we received $554.2 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the second and third tranches of the Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates. As a result, we will recognize a gain of $25.0 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011.

At November 28, 2010, the outstanding Notes, which were classified within prepaid expenses and other current assets, had a carrying value of $527.5 million. At May 30, 2010, the outstanding Notes, which were classified as other assets, had an aggregate carrying value of $490.2 million.

5. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES

Variable Interest Entities Consolidated

In September 2008, we acquired a 49.99% interest in Lamb Weston BSW, LLC (“Lamb Weston BSW”), a potato processing venture with Ochoa Ag Unlimited Foods, Inc. (“Ochoa”). We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston BSW. Under certain circumstances, we could be required to compensate the other equity owner of Lamb Weston BSW for lost profits resulting from significant production shortfalls (“production shortfalls”). Commencing on June 1, 2018, or on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we have a contractual right to purchase the remaining equity interest in Lamb Weston BSW from Ochoa (the “call option”). Commencing on July 30, 2011, or on an earlier date under certain circumstances, we are subject to a contractual obligation to purchase all of Ochoa’s equity investment in Lamb Weston BSW at the option of Ochoa (the “put option”). The purchase prices under the call option and the put option (the “options”) are based on the book value of Ochoa’s equity interest at the date of exercise, as modified by an agreed-upon rate of return for the holding period of the investment balance. The agreed-upon rate of return varies depending on the circumstances under which any of the options are exercised. We have determined that Lamb Weston BSW is a variable interest entity and that we are the primary beneficiary of the entity. Accordingly, we consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW.

10

In the first quarter of fiscal 2010, we established a line of credit with Lamb Weston BSW, under which we will lend up to $1.5 million to Lamb Weston BSW. As of November 28, 2010, the balance of $1.1 million was due upon demand. Borrowings under the line of credit bear interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 3%. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we repaid $35.4 million of bank borrowings of Lamb Weston BSW and took assignment of a promissory note from the joint venture for the same amount, due in June 2018. The promissory note carries a tiered interest rate schedule and is currently accruing interest at a rate of LIBOR plus 350 basis points with a floor of 4.25%. The amounts owed by Lamb Weston BSW to the Company are not reflected in our balance sheets, as they are eliminated in consolidation.

Our variable interests in Lamb Weston BSW include an equity investment in the venture, the options, the promissory note, certain fees paid to us by Lamb Weston BSW for sales and marketing services, the contingent obligation related to production shortfalls, and the line of credit advanced to Lamb Weston BSW. Our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture is equal to our equity investment in the venture and advances under the line of credit and the promissory note extended to the venture, except under certain circumstances under which production shortfalls occur. In the event of a production shortfall, we could be required to compensate the other equity owner of Lamb Weston BSW for lost profits. It is not possible to determine the maximum exposure to losses from production shortfalls. However, we do not expect to incur any losses resulting from this exposure.

We also consolidate the assets and liabilities of several entities from which we lease corporate aircraft. Each of these entities has been determined to be a variable interest entity and we have been determined to be the primary beneficiary of each of these entities. Under the terms of the aircraft leases, we provide guarantees to the owners of these entities of a minimum residual value of the aircraft at the end of the lease term. We also have fixed price purchase options on the aircraft leased from these entities. Our maximum exposure to loss from our involvement with these entities is limited to the difference between the fair value of the leased aircraft and the amount of the residual value guarantees at the time we terminate the leases (the leases expire between December 2011 and October 2012). The total amount of the residual value guarantees for these aircraft at the end of the respective lease terms is $38.4 million.

Due to the consolidation of these variable interest entities, we reflected in our balance sheets:

	November 28,		May 30,
	2010		2010
Cash and cash equivalents	$	2.6	$	—
Receivables, net		15.9		16.9
Inventories		1.5		1.4
Prepaid expenses and other current assets		0.2		0.3
Property, plant and equipment, net		93.7		96.5
Goodwill		18.8		18.8
Brands, trademarks and other intangibles, net		9.4		9.8
Total assets	$	142.1	$	143.7
Current installments of long-term debt	$	3.9	$	6.4
Accounts payable		11.3		12.2
Accrued payroll		0.3		0.3
Other accrued liabilities		0.7		0.7
Senior long-term debt, excluding current installments		41.5		76.8
Other noncurrent liabilities (noncontrolling interest)		25.6		24.8
Total liabilities	$	83.3	$	121.2

The liabilities recognized as a result of consolidating the Lamb Weston BSW entity do not represent additional claims on our general assets. The creditors of Lamb Weston BSW have claims only on the assets of Lamb Weston BSW. The assets recognized as a result of consolidating Lamb Weston BSW are the property of the venture and are not available to us for any other purpose, other than as a secured lender under the promissory note.

Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated

We also have variable interests in certain other entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We have not consolidated the financial statements of these entities.

We hold a 50% interest in Lamb Weston RDO, a potato processing venture. We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston RDO. We receive a fee for these services based on a percentage of the net sales of the venture. We reflect the value of our ownership interest in this venture in other assets, based upon the equity method of accounting. The balance of our investment was $13.0 million and $13.8 million at November 28, 2010 and May 30, 2010, respectively, representing our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture. The capital structure of Lamb Weston RDO includes owners’ equity of $26.1 million

11

and term borrowings from banks of $45.3 million as of November 28, 2010. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this venture.

We lease certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased, representing our only variable interest in these lessor entities. These leases are accounted for as operating leases, and accordingly, there are no material assets or liabilities associated with these entities included in our balance sheets. We have no material exposure to loss from our variable interests in these entities. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements, the expected remaining useful lives of the assets leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.

6. GARNER, NORTH CAROLINA ACCIDENT

On June 9, 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina (the “Garner accident”). This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim^® branded meat snacks. On June 13, 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release, and not a deliberate act.

We maintain comprehensive property (including business interruption), workers’ compensation, and general liability insurance policies with very significant loss limits that we believe will provide substantial and broad coverage for the currently foreseeable losses arising from this accident.

We recognized charges totaling $8.1 million ($3.7 million in selling, general and administrative expenses and $4.4 million in cost of goods sold) and $44.7 million ($34.1 million in selling, general and administrative expenses and $10.6 million in cost of goods sold) in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively, in connection with the Garner accident. These amounts exclude lost profits from the interruption of the business. We also recognized insurance recoveries of $7.3 million and $41.0 million in selling, general and administrative expenses in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively. The costs incurred and insurance recoveries recognized in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011 were not material.

Through November 28, 2010, we had received payment advances from the insurers of $109.0 million for our initial insurance claims for this matter, $59.8 million of which has been recognized as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses (primarily in fiscal 2010), largely offsetting the cumulative charges of $63.7 million recognized to date in connection with the event. The deferred balance of $49.2 million is classified as other accrued liabilities within our consolidated balance sheet as of November 28, 2010, in accordance with applicable accounting guidance. We anticipate final settlement of the claim will occur in fiscal 2011. Based on management’s current assessment of production options, the expected level of insurance proceeds, and the estimated potential amount of losses and impact on the Slim Jim^® brand, we do not believe that the Garner accident will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity.

7. GOODWILL AND OTHER IDENTIFIABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the first half of fiscal 2011 was as follows:

	Consumer		Commercial
	Foods		Foods		Total
Balance as of May 30, 2010	$	3,423.5	$	128.6	$	3,552.1
Acquisitions		51.5		—		51.5
Translation and other		2.8		0.5		3.3
Balance as of November 28, 2010	$	3,477.8	$	129.1	$	3,606.9

Other identifiable intangible assets were as follows:

	November 28, 2010				May 30, 2010
	Gross				Gross
	Carrying		Accumulated		Carrying		Accumulated
	Amount		Amortization		Amount		Amortization
Non-amortizing intangible assets	$	771.2	$	—	$	771.2	$	—
Amortizing intangible assets		201.1		39.6		134.8		31.2
	$	972.3	$	39.6	$	906.0	$	31.2

Non-amortizing intangible assets are comprised of brands and trademarks.

12

Amortizing intangible assets, carrying a weighted average life of approximately 13 years, are principally composed of licensing arrangements and customer relationships. Based on amortizing assets recognized in our balance sheet as of November 28, 2010, amortization expense is estimated to be $15.0 million for each of the next five years.

8. DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Our operations are exposed to market risks from adverse changes in commodity prices affecting the cost of raw materials and energy, foreign currency exchange rates, and interest rates. In the normal course of business, these risks are managed through a variety of strategies, including the use of derivatives.

Commodity futures and option contracts are used from time to time to economically hedge commodity input prices on items such as natural gas, vegetable oils, proteins, dairy, grains, and electricity. Generally, we economically hedge a portion of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs for periods of up to 36 months. We may enter into longer-term economic hedges on particular commodities, if deemed appropriate. As of November 28, 2010, we had economically hedged certain portions of our anticipated consumption of commodity inputs using derivative instruments with expiration dates through March 2012.

In order to reduce exposures related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, when deemed prudent, we enter into forward exchange, option, or swap contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the applicable functional currency. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign-denominated assets and liabilities. As of November 28, 2010, we had economically hedged certain portions of our foreign currency risk in anticipated transactions using derivative instruments with expiration dates through May 2017.

From time to time, we may use derivative instruments, including interest rate swaps, to reduce risk related to changes in interest rates. This includes, but is not limited to, hedging against increasing interest rates prior to the issuance of long-term debt and hedging the fair value of our senior long-term debt.

Derivatives Designated as Fair Value Hedges

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we entered into interest rate swap contracts to hedge the change in the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2012 and 2015, due to changes in the benchmark interest rate. The interest rate swaps effectively changed our interest rates on the senior long-term debt instruments from fixed to variable. We designated these interest rate swap contracts as fair value hedges of the debt instruments.

Changes in fair value of the derivative instruments are immediately recognized in earnings along with changes in the fair value of the items being hedged (based solely on the change in the benchmark interest rate). These gains and losses are classified within selling, general and administrative expenses. A net gain of $1.1 million and $23.0 million was recognized on the interest rate swap contracts during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011, respectively. A net loss of $10.4 million and $29.7 million was recognized on the senior long-term debt during the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011, respectively.

During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we terminated the interest rate swap contracts and received proceeds of $31.5 million. The cumulative adjustment to the fair value of the debt instruments being hedged (the effective portion of the hedge), $33.8 million, will be amortized as a reduction of interest expense through fiscal 2015, which is over the remaining lives of the debt instruments.

The entire change in fair value of the derivative instruments was included in our assessment of hedge effectiveness.

The net notional amount of the interest rate derivatives outstanding at May 30, 2010 was $842.7 million.

Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows

Many of our derivatives do not qualify for, and we do not currently designate certain commodity or foreign currency derivatives to achieve, hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption and to mitigate foreign currency cash flow risk in earnings immediately within general corporate expense (within cost of goods sold). The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold.

13

Economic Hedges of Fair Values — Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk

We may use cross currency swaps to economically hedge the fair value of certain monetary assets and liabilities (including intercompany balances) denominated in a currency other than the functional currency. These derivatives are marked-to-market with gains and losses immediately recognized in selling, general and administrative expenses. These substantially offset the foreign currency transaction gains or losses recognized on the monetary assets or liabilities being economically hedged.

Derivative Activity in Our Milling Operations

We also use derivative instruments within our milling operations, which are part of the Commercial Foods segment. Derivative instruments used to economically hedge commodity inventories and forward purchase and sales contracts within the milling operations are marked-to-market such that realized and unrealized gains and losses are immediately included in operating results. The underlying inventory and forward contracts being hedged are also marked-to-market with changes in market value recognized immediately in operating results.

For commodity derivative trading activities within our milling operations that are not intended to mitigate commodity input cost risk, the derivative instrument is marked-to-market each period with gains and losses included in net sales of the Commercial Foods segment. There were no material gains or losses from derivative trading activities in the periods being reported.

All derivative instruments are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. The fair value of derivative assets is recognized within prepaid expenses and other current assets, while the fair value of derivative liabilities is recognized within other accrued liabilities. In accordance with FASB guidance, we offset certain derivative asset and liability balances, as well as certain amounts representing rights to reclaim cash collateral and obligations to return cash collateral, where legal right of setoff exists. At November 28, 2010 and May 30, 2010, amounts representing a right to reclaim cash collateral of $8.7 million and $8.6 million, respectively, were included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in our balance sheets.

Derivative assets and liabilities and amounts representing a right to reclaim cash collateral were reflected in our balance sheets as follows:

	November 28,		May 30,
	2010		2010
Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	49.4	$	61.8
Other accrued liabilities		40.5		10.1

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, on a gross basis, prior to the offsetting of amounts where legal right of setoff existed at November 28, 2010:

	Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value
Commodity contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	54.9	Other accrued liabilities	$	45.4
Foreign exchange contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		2.5	Other accrued liabilities		10.2
Other	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		0.1	Other accrued liabilities		1.7
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	57.5		$	57.3
Total derivatives		$	57.5		$	57.3

14

The following table presents our derivative assets and liabilities, on a gross basis, prior to the offsetting of amounts where legal right of setoff existed at May 30, 2010:

	Derivative Assets			Derivative Liabilities
	Balance Sheet			Balance Sheet
	Location	Fair Value		Location	Fair Value
Interest rate contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	8.5	Other accrued liabilities	$	—
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments		$	8.5		$	—
Commodity contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets	$	48.7	Other accrued liabilities	$	20.0
Foreign exchange contracts	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		8.1	Other accrued liabilities		1.3
Other	Prepaid expenses and other current assets		—	Other accrued liabilities		0.9
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments		$	56.8		$	22.2
Total derivatives		$	65.3		$	22.2

The location and amount of gains (losses) from derivatives not designated as hedging instruments in our statements of earnings were as follows:

	Location in
	Consolidated
	Statement
	of Earnings of Gain	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging	(Loss) Recognized	in Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the Thirteen Weeks Ended
Instruments	on Derivatives	November 28, 2010			November 29, 2009
Commodity contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	35.4		$	13.2
Foreign exchange contracts	Cost of goods sold		(2.6	)		(5.1	)
Foreign exchange contracts	Selling, general and administrative expense		(2.0	)		—
Total gain from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments		$	30.8		$	8.1

	Location in
	Consolidated
	Statement
	of Earnings of Gain	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized on Derivatives
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging	(Loss) Recognized	in Consolidated Statement of Earnings for the Twenty-six Weeks Ended
Instruments	on Derivatives	November 28, 2010			November 29, 2009
Commodity contracts	Cost of goods sold	$	9.7		$	79.7
Foreign exchange contracts	Cost of goods sold		(12.2	)		(6.8	)
Foreign exchange contracts	Selling, general and administrative expense		(2.4	)		—
Total gain (loss) from derivative instruments not designated as hedging instruments		$	(4.9	)	$	72.9

As of November 28, 2010, our open commodity contracts had a notional value (defined as notional quantity times market value per notional quantity unit) of $641.2 million and $1.0 billion for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. As of May 30, 2010, our open commodity contracts had a notional value of $563.7 million and $577.1 million for purchase and sales contracts, respectively. The notional amount of our foreign currency forward and cross currency swap contracts as of November 28, 2010 and May 30, 2010 was $254.2 million and $240.0 million, respectively. In addition, we held foreign currency option collar contracts with notional amounts of $97.6 million and $97.2 million as of November 28, 2010 and May 30, 2010, respectively.

We enter into certain commodity, interest rate, and foreign exchange derivatives with a diversified group of counterparties. We monitor our positions and the credit ratings of the counterparties involved and limit the amount of credit exposure to any one party. These transactions may expose us to potential losses due to the risk of nonperformance by these counterparties. We have not incurred a material loss in any period presented and do not expect to incur any such material loss. We also enter into futures and options transactions through various regulated exchanges.

At November 28, 2010, the maximum amount of loss due to the credit risk of the counterparties, had the counterparties failed to perform according to the terms of the contracts, was $35.4 million.

15

9. SHARE-BASED PAYMENTS

For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended November 28, 2010, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense (including stock options, restricted stock units, and performance shares) of $14.3 million and $22.7 million, respectively. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended November 29, 2009, we recognized total stock-based compensation expense of $14.7 million and $26.7 million, respectively. During the first half of fiscal 2011, we granted 1.4 million restricted stock units at a weighted average grant date price of $23.79, 6.2 million stock options at a weighted average exercise price of $23.81, and 0.5 million performance shares at a weighted average grant date price of $21.43.

The performance shares are granted to selected executives and other key employees with vesting contingent upon meeting various Company-wide performance goals. The performance goals are based upon our earnings before interest and taxes and our return on average invested capital measured over a defined performance period. The awards actually earned will range from zero to three hundred percent of the targeted number of the performance shares granted in fiscal 2009 and fiscal 2010 and from zero to two hundred percent of the targeted number of the performance shares granted in fiscal 2011, and will in each case be paid in shares of common stock. Subject to limited exceptions set forth in the plan, any shares earned will be distributed at the end of the defined performance period. The value of the performance shares granted in fiscal 2009, 2010, and 2011 is adjusted based upon the market price of our stock at the end of each reporting period and amortized as compensation expense over the vesting period.

The weighted average Black-Scholes assumptions for stock options granted during the first half of fiscal 2011 were as follows:

Expected volatility (%)	22.83
Dividend yield (%)	3.50
Risk-free interest rate (%)	1.71
Expected life of stock option (years)	4.82

The weighted average value of stock options granted during the first half of fiscal 2011 was $3.31 per option, based upon a Black-Scholes methodology.

10. EARNINGS PER SHARE

Basic earnings per share is calculated on the basis of weighted average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share is computed on the basis of basic weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock awards, and other dilutive securities.

The following table reconciles the income and average share amounts used to compute both basic and diluted earnings per share:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,			November 29,			November 28,			November 29,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net income available to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders:
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	200.3		$	238.3		$	344.1		$	402.0
Income from discontinued operations, net of tax, attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders		0.6			1.4			3.2			3.6
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	200.9		$	239.7		$	347.3		$	405.6
Less: Increase in redemption value of noncontrolling interests in excess of earnings allocated		(0.9	)		(0.3	)		(2.3	)		(0.6	)
Net income available to ConAgra Foods, Inc. common stockholders	$	200.0		$	239.4		$	345.0		$	405.0
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic weighted average shares outstanding		437.8			443.2			439.7			443.2
Add: Dilutive effect of stock options, restricted stock awards, and other dilutive securities		3.8			3.0			4.1			2.6
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding		441.6			446.2			443.8			445.8

For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended November 28, 2010, there were 21.2 million and 19.0 million stock options outstanding, respectively, that were excluded from the computation of shares contingently issuable upon exercise of the stock options because

16

exercise prices exceeded the average market value of our common stock during the period. For the thirteen and twenty-six weeks ended November 29, 2009, there were 29.8 million and 36.4 million stock options, respectively, excluded from the calculation.

11. INVENTORIES

The major classes of inventories were as follows:

	November 28,		May 30,
	2010		2010
Raw materials and packaging	$	670.7	$	481.0
Work in process		135.2		95.9
Finished goods		1,080.2		945.0
Supplies and other		88.2		84.6
	$	1,974.3	$	1,606.5

12. RESTRUCTURING

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, our Board of Directors approved a plan recommended by executive management related to the long-term production of our meat snack products. The plan provides for the closure of our meat snacks production facility in Garner, North Carolina, and the movement of production to our existing facility in Troy, Ohio. Since the Garner accident, the Troy facility has been producing a portion of our meat snack products. Upon completion of the plan’s implementation, which is expected to be in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Troy facility will be our primary meat snacks production facility. The plan is expected to result in the termination of approximately 500 employee positions in Garner and the creation of approximately 200 employee positions in Troy.

Also in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we made a decision to move certain administrative functions from Edina, Minnesota, to Naperville, Illinois. We completed the transition of these functions in the first half of fiscal 2011. This plan, together with the plan to move production of our meat snacks from Garner, North Carolina to Troy, Ohio, is collectively referred to as the 2010 restructuring plan (“2010 plan”).

In connection with the 2010 plan, we expect to incur pre-tax cash and non-cash charges for asset impairments, accelerated depreciation, severance, relocation, and site closure costs of $70.2 million, of which $39.2 million was recognized in fiscal 2010. We have recognized expenses associated with the 2010 plan, including but not limited to, impairments of property, plant and equipment, accelerated depreciation, severance and related costs, and plan implementation costs (e.g., consulting, employee relocation, etc.). We anticipate that we will recognize the following pre-tax expenses associated with the 2010 plan in the fiscal 2010 to 2012 timeframe (amounts include charges recognized in fiscal 2010 and in the first half of fiscal 2011):

	Consumer
	Foods		Corporate		Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	21.2	$	—	$	21.2
Inventory write-offs		0.7		—		0.7
Total cost of goods sold		21.9		—		21.9
Asset impairment		16.5		—		16.5
Severance and related costs		16.1		—		16.1
Other, net		12.1		3.6		15.7
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		44.7		3.6		48.3
Consolidated total	$	66.6	$	3.6	$	70.2

Included in the above estimates are $30.1 million of charges which have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $40.1 million of non-cash charges.

17

During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we recognized the following pre-tax charges in our consolidated statement of earnings for the 2010 plan:

	Consumer
	Foods		Corporate		Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	3.5	$	—	$	3.5
Total cost of goods sold		3.5		—		3.5
Severance and related costs		0.3		—		0.3
Other, net		0.9		—		0.9
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		1.2		—		1.2
Consolidated total	$	4.7	$	—	$	4.7

During the first half of fiscal 2011, we recognized the following pre-tax charges in our consolidated statement of earnings for the 2010 plan:

	Consumer
	Foods		Corporate		Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	6.9	$	—	$	6.9
Total cost of goods sold		6.9		—		6.9
Severance and related costs		0.8		—		0.8
Other, net		4.9		0.1		5.0
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		5.7		0.1		5.8
Consolidated total	$	12.6	$	0.1	$	12.7

We recognized the following cumulative (plan inception to November 28, 2010) pre-tax charges related to the 2010 plan in our consolidated statement of earnings:

	Consumer
	Foods		Corporate		Total
Accelerated depreciation	$	10.2	$	—	$	10.2
Total cost of goods sold		10.2		—		10.2
Asset impairment		16.5		—		16.5
Severance and related costs		14.9		—		14.9
Other, net		6.6		3.6		10.2
Total selling, general and administrative expenses		38.0		3.6		41.6
Consolidated total	$	48.2	$	3.6	$	51.8

Liabilities recorded for the various initiatives and changes therein for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 under the 2010 plan were as follows:

	Balance at		Costs Incurred							Balance at
	August 29,		and Charged		Costs Paid			Changes in		November 28,
	2010		to Expense		or Otherwise Settled			Estimates		2010
Severance and related costs	$	13.1	$	0.3	$	(1.8	)	$	—	$	11.6
Plan implementation costs		1.1		0.9		(1.2	)		—		0.8
Other costs		3.0		—		—			—		3.0
Total	$	17.2	$	1.2	$	(3.0	)	$	—	$	15.4

13. INCOME TAXES

Our income tax expense from continuing operations for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010 was $101.4 million and $114.1 million, respectively. Income tax expense from continuing operations for the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010 was $168.4 million and $202.9 million, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) from continuing operations was approximately 34% and 33% for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011, respectively, and 32% and 34% for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively. The effective tax rates for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 reflected a benefit of approximately 3% and 1%, respectively, from certain income tax credits and deductions identified in this period related to prior periods.

The amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits for uncertain tax positions, including positions impacting only the timing of tax benefits, was $58.7 million as of November 28, 2010 and $53.4 million as of May 30, 2010. Included in the balance was $3.8 million

18

as of November 28, 2010 and $4.6 million as of May 30, 2010 for tax positions for which the ultimate deductibility is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty about the timing of such deductibility. Because of the impact of deferred tax accounting, the disallowance of the shorter deductibility period would not affect the annual effective tax rate but would accelerate the payment of cash to the taxing authority to an earlier period. Any associated interest and penalties imposed would affect the tax rate. The gross unrecognized tax benefits excluded related liabilities for gross interest and penalties of $14.7 million and $14.8 million as of November 28, 2010 and May 30, 2010, respectively.

The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at November 28, 2010 and May 30, 2010 that, if recognized, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate was $36.7 million and $32.6 million, respectively. Recognition of these tax benefits would have a favorable impact on the Company’s effective tax rate.

We estimate that it is reasonably possible that the amount of gross unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by $0 to $5 million over the next twelve months due to various federal, state, and foreign audit settlements and the expiration of statutes of limitations.

14. CONTINGENCIES

In fiscal 1991, we acquired Beatrice Company (“Beatrice”). As a result of the acquisition and the significant pre-acquisition contingencies of the Beatrice businesses and its former subsidiaries, our consolidated post-acquisition financial statements reflect liabilities associated with the estimated resolution of these contingencies. These include various litigation and environmental proceedings related to businesses divested by Beatrice prior to its acquisition by us. The litigation includes suits against a number of lead paint and pigment manufacturers, including ConAgra Grocery Products and the Company as alleged successors to W. P. Fuller Co., a lead paint and pigment manufacturer owned and operated by Beatrice until 1967. Although decisions favorable to us have been rendered in Rhode Island, New Jersey, Wisconsin, and Ohio, we remain a defendant in active suits in Illinois and California. The Illinois suit seeks class-wide relief in the form of medical monitoring for elevated levels of lead in blood. In California, a number of cities and counties joined in a consolidated action seeking abatement of the alleged public nuisance.

The environmental proceedings include litigation and administrative proceedings involving Beatrice’s status as a potentially responsible party at 36 Superfund, proposed Superfund, or state-equivalent sites; these sites involve locations previously owned or operated by predecessors of Beatrice that used or produced petroleum, pesticides, fertilizers, dyes, inks, solvents, PCBs, acids, lead, sulfur, tannery wastes, and/or other contaminants. Beatrice has paid or is in the process of paying its liability share at 33 of these sites. Reserves for these matters have been established based on our best estimate of the undiscounted remediation liabilities, which estimates include evaluation of investigatory studies, extent of required clean-up, the known volumetric contribution of Beatrice and other potentially responsible parties, and its experience in remediating sites. The reserves for Beatrice environmental matters totaled $70.2 million as of November 28, 2010, a majority of which relates to the Superfund and state-equivalent sites referenced above. We expect expenditures for Beatrice environmental matters to continue for up to 20 years.

In limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. At the time in which we initially provide such a guarantee, we assess the risk of financial exposure to us under these agreements. We consider the credit-worthiness of the guaranteed party, the value of any collateral pledged against the related obligation, and any other factors that may mitigate our risk (e.g., letters of credit from a financial institution). We actively monitor market and entity-specific conditions that may result in a change of our assessment of the risk of loss under these agreements.

We guarantee certain leases and other commercial obligations resulting from the divestiture of our fresh beef and pork operations. The remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed five years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $14.7 million as of November 28, 2010.

We have also guaranteed the performance of the divested fresh beef and pork business with respect to a hog purchase contract. The hog purchase contract requires the divested fresh beef and pork business to purchase a minimum of approximately 1.2 million hogs annually through 2014. The contract stipulates minimum price commitments, based in part on market prices, and, in certain circumstances, also includes price adjustments based on certain inputs. We have not established a liability for any of the fresh beef and pork divestiture-related guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.

We are a party to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under certain conditions. At November 28, 2010, the amount of supplier loans we have effectively guaranteed was $6.8 million. We have not established a liability for these guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.

We are a party to various agreements with an onion processing company. We have guaranteed, under certain conditions, repayment of a portion of the loan held by this supplier for its onion processing related operations. At November 28, 2010, the amount of our

19

guarantee was $25.0 million. In the event of default on this loan by the supplier, we have the contractual right to purchase the loan from the lender, thereby giving us secured rights to the underlying collateral. We have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee, as we believe the likelihood of financial exposure to us under this guarantee is remote.

Federal income tax credits were generated related to our sweet potato production facility in Delhi, Louisiana. Third parties invested in certain of these income tax credits. We have guaranteed these third parties the face value of these income tax credits over their statutory lives, a period of seven years, in the event that the income tax credits are recaptured or reduced. The face value of the income tax credits was $21.2 million as of November 28, 2010. We believe the likelihood of the recapture or reduction of the income tax credits is remote, and therefore we have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee.

We are a party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of the operation of our business, including lawsuits and claims related to the February 2007 recall of our peanut butter products and litigation we initiated against an insurance carrier to recover our settlement expenditures and defense costs. We recognized a charge of $24.8 million during the third quarter of fiscal 2009 in connection with the disputed coverage with this insurance carrier. During the second quarter of fiscal 2010, a Delaware state court rendered a decision on certain matters in our claim for the disputed coverage favorable to the insurance carrier. We have appealed this decision and continue to pursue this matter vigorously.

In June 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina. See Note 6 for information related to this matter.

We are a party to several lawsuits concerning the use of diacetyl, a butter flavoring ingredient that was added to our microwave popcorn until late 2007. The cases are primarily consumer personal injury suits claiming respiratory illness allegedly due to exposures to vapors from microwaving popcorn. Another case involved a putative class action contending that our packaging information with respect to diacetyl is false and misleading. Through the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we have received a favorable verdict, summary judgment ruling, and two dismissals in connection with these suits, and the class action motion in the packaging suit was denied. The verdict and the favorable summary judgment ruling have been appealed. We do not believe these cases possess merit and continue to vigorously defend them.

After taking into account liabilities recognized for all of the foregoing matters, management believes the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity. It is reasonably possible that a change in one of the estimates of the foregoing matters may occur in the future. Costs of legal services are recognized in earnings as services are provided.

15. PENSION AND POSTRETIREMENT BENEFITS

We have defined benefit retirement plans (“plans”) for eligible salaried and hourly employees. Benefits are based on years of credited service and average compensation or stated amounts for each year of service. We also sponsor postretirement plans which provide certain medical and dental benefits (“other postretirement benefits”) to qualifying U.S. employees.

20

Components of pension benefit and other postretirement benefit costs included:

	Pension Benefits
	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,			November 29,			November 28,			November 29,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Service cost	$	14.9		$	12.5		$	29.8		$	25.0
Interest cost		36.9			37.0			73.8			74.0
Expected return on plan assets		(43.3	)		(40.3	)		(86.6	)		(80.6	)
Amortization of prior service cost		0.8			0.8			1.6			1.6
Settlement cost		—			1.9			—			1.9
Curtailment loss		—			—			1.3			—
Recognized net actuarial loss		4.1			1.0			8.2			1.9
Benefit cost — Company plans		13.4			12.9			28.1			23.8
Pension benefit cost — multi-employer plans		2.6			3.1			5.1			5.6
Total benefit cost	$	16.0		$	16.0		$	33.2		$	29.4

	Postretirement Benefits
	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,			November 29,			November 28,			November 29,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Service cost	$	0.2		$	0.1		$	0.3		$	0.2
Interest cost		4.0			4.5			8.1			9.0
Expected return on plan assets		—			(0.1	)		(0.1	)		(0.2	)
Amortization of prior service cost		(2.3	)		(2.3	)		(4.7	)		(4.7	)
Recognized net actuarial loss		1.1			—			2.3			—
Total cost — Company plans	$	3.0		$	2.2		$	5.9		$	4.3

During the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011, we contributed $1.9 million and $112.0 million, respectively, to our pension plans and contributed $7.4 million and $14.6 million, respectively, to our other postretirement plans. Based upon the current funded status of the plans and the current interest rate environment, we anticipate making further contributions of $10.0 million to our pension plans for the remainder of fiscal 2011. We anticipate making further contributions of $17.4 million to our other postretirement plans during the remainder of fiscal 2011. These estimates are based on current tax laws, plan asset performance, and liability assumptions, all of which are subject to change.

16. LONG-TERM DEBT

During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we repaid the entire principal balance of $248.0 million of our 7.875% senior notes, which were due September 15, 2010.

We consolidate the financial statements of Lamb Weston BSW. In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we repaid $35.4 million of bank borrowings by our Lamb Weston BSW potato processing venture.

Net interest expense consisted of:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,			November 29,			November 28,			November 29,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Long-term debt	$	56.3		$	63.9		$	116.6		$	128.5
Short-term debt		—			—			0.1			—
Interest income		(19.4	)		(20.6	)		(38.8	)		(40.9	)
Interest capitalized		(3.2	)		(2.8	)		(6.9	)		(5.7	)
	$	33.7		$	40.5		$	71.0		$	81.9

Our net interest expense for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011 was reduced by $3.9 million and $8.3 million, respectively, due to the impact of the interest rate swap contracts entered into in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010. The interest rate swaps effectively changed our interest rates on the senior long-term debt instruments maturing in fiscal 2012 and 2015 from fixed to variable. See Note 8 for further discussion on these derivative instruments.

21

17. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

We have repurchased shares of our common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. In February 2010, our Board of Directors approved a $500 million share repurchase program with no expiration date. We repurchased approximately 8.8 million shares of our common stock for $200 million under this program in the first half of fiscal 2011. Upon receipt of payment for the final two outstanding tranches of the Notes from the purchaser of the trading and merchandising business, on December 6, 2010 (subsequent to the end of the second fiscal quarter), our Board of Directors increased our share repurchase authorization by the amount of the payment, which was $554.2 million. See Note 4 for further information on the Notes.

The following table presents a reconciliation of our stockholders’ equity accounts for the twenty-six weeks ended November 28, 2010:

	ConAgra Foods, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity
											Accumulated
					Additional						Other
	Common		Common		Paid-in			Retained			Comprehensive			Treasury			Noncontrolling		Total
	Shares		Stock		Capital			Earnings			Income (Loss)			Stock			Interests		Equity
Balance at May 30, 2010		567.9	$	2,839.7	$	897.5		$	4,417.1		$	(285.3	)	$	(2,945.1	)	$	5.0	$	4,928.9
Stock option and incentive plans						(3.4	)		(0.2	)					48.0					44.4
Currency translation adjustment												18.0								18.0
Repurchase of common shares															(200.0	)				(200.0	)
Derivative adjustment, net of reclassification adjustment												0.1								0.1
Activities of noncontrolling interests						(2.3	)													(2.3	)
Pension and postretirement healthcare benefits												3.3								3.3
Dividends declared on common stock; $0.43 per share									(188.0	)										(188.0	)
Net income attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.									347.3											347.3
Balance at November 28, 2010		567.9	$	2,839.7	$	891.8		$	4,576.2		$	(263.9	)	$	(3,097.1	)	$	5.0	$	4,951.7

18. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB guidance on fair value measurements, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements, was effective as of the beginning of our fiscal 2009 for our financial assets and liabilities, as well as for other assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value on a recurring basis in our consolidated financial statements. As of the beginning of fiscal 2010, we adopted additional new guidance relating to nonrecurring fair value measurement requirements for nonfinancial assets and liabilities. These include long-lived assets, goodwill, asset retirement obligations, and certain investments. These items are recognized at fair value when they are considered to be other than temporarily impaired.

FASB guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price assets or liabilities. The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

Level 1 — Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities,

Level 2 — Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1, such as quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets, and

Level 3 — Unobservable inputs reflecting our own assumptions and best estimate of what inputs market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.

22

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of November 28, 2010:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Derivative assets	$	14.0	$	35.4	$	—	$	49.4
Available-for-sale securities		1.7		—		—		1.7
Deferred compensation assets		7.1		—		—		7.1
Total assets	$	22.8	$	35.4	$	—	$	58.2
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	0.3	$	40.2	$	—	$	40.5
Deferred compensation liabilities		27.3		—		—		27.3
Total liabilities	$	27.6	$	40.2	$	—	$	67.8

The following table presents our financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis based upon the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurements fall, as of May 30, 2010:

	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets:
Derivative assets	$	5.7	$	56.1	$	—	$	61.8
Available-for-sale securities		1.8		—		—		1.8
Deferred compensation assets		7.1		—		—		7.1
Total assets	$	14.6	$	56.1	$	—	$	70.7
Liabilities:
Derivative liabilities	$	0.3	$	9.8	$	—	$	10.1
Deferred compensation liabilities		22.1		—		—		22.1
Total liabilities	$	22.4	$	9.8	$	—	$	32.2

Certain assets and liabilities, including long-lived assets, goodwill, asset retirement obligations, and cost and equity investments are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. There were no significant fair market measurement losses recognized for such assets and liabilities in the periods reported.

The carrying amount of long-term debt (including current installments) was $3.2 billion as of November 28, 2010. Based on current market rates provided primarily by outside investment bankers, the fair value of this debt at November 28, 2010 was estimated at $3.7 billion.

19. BUSINESS SEGMENTS AND RELATED INFORMATION

We report our operations in two reporting segments: Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods. The Consumer Foods reporting segment includes branded, private label, and customized food products, which are sold in various retail and foodservice channels, principally in North America. The products include a variety of categories (e.g., meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) across frozen, refrigerated, and shelf-stable temperature classes. The Commercial Foods reporting segment includes commercially branded foods and ingredients, which are sold principally to foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The Commercial Foods segment’s primary products include: specialty potato products, milled grain ingredients, a variety of vegetable products, seasonings, blends, and flavors which are sold under brands such as Lamb Weston^®, ConAgra Mills^®, and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings^TM.

23

Intersegment sales have been recorded at amounts approximating market. Operating profit for each of the segments is based on net sales less all identifiable operating expenses. General corporate expense, net interest expense, and income taxes have been excluded from segment operations.

	Thirteen weeks ended					Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,		November 29,			November 28,		November 29,
	2010		2009			2010		2009
Net sales
Consumer Foods	$	2,104.2	$	2,078.1		$	3,928.4	$	3,938.2
Commercial Foods		1,056.9		1,022.0			2,050.3		2,048.2
Total net sales	$	3,161.1	$	3,100.1		$	5,978.7	$	5,986.4
Operating profit
Consumer Foods	$	283.9	$	330.0		$	497.9	$	579.9
Commercial Foods		126.3		151.0			238.1		285.1
Total operating profit	$	410.2	$	481.0		$	736.0	$	865.0
Equity method investment earnings
Consumer Foods	$	1.3	$	1.6		$	2.4	$	2.2
Commercial Foods		3.3		4.3			8.4		12.6
Total equity method investment earnings	$	4.6	$	5.9		$	10.8	$	14.8
Operating profit plus equity method investment earnings
Consumer Foods	$	285.2	$	331.6		$	500.3	$	582.1
Commercial Foods		129.6		155.3			246.5		297.7
Total operating profit plus equity method investment earnings	$	414.8	$	486.9		$	746.8	$	879.8
General corporate expenses	$	78.5	$	94.5		$	162.5	$	194.2
Interest expense, net		33.7		40.5			71.0		81.9
Income tax expense		101.4		114.1			168.4		202.9
Income from continuing operations	$	201.2	$	237.8		$	344.9	$	400.8
Less: Income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests		0.9		(0.5	)		0.8		(1.2	)
Income from continuing operations attributable to ConAgra Foods, Inc.	$	200.3	$	238.3		$	344.1	$	402.0

Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) for Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results

Commodity derivatives used to manage commodity input price risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives (except for those related to our milling operations) used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption in earnings immediately within general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold.

Foreign currency derivatives used to manage foreign currency risk of forecasted cash flows are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings.

The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and currency risk of our foreign operations under this methodology:

	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,			November 29,			November 28,			November 29,
	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred	$	6.6		$	2.0		$	(1.2	)	$	(14.6	)
Less: Net derivative losses allocated to reporting segments		(2.5	)		(3.8	)		(4.5	)		(13.5	)
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses	$	9.1		$	5.8		$	3.3		$	(1.1	)
Net derivative losses allocated to Consumer Foods	$	(1.9	)	$	(2.9	)	$	(3.7	)	$	(8.8	)
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial Foods		(0.6	)		(0.9	)		(0.8	)		(4.7	)
Net derivative losses included in segment operating profit	$	(2.5	)	$	(3.8	)	$	(4.5	)	$	(13.5	)

24

Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify gains of $1.9 million and losses of $1.5 million to segment operating results in the second half of fiscal 2011 and 2012 and thereafter, respectively. Amounts allocated, or to be allocated, to segment operating results during fiscal 2011 and thereafter include $2.9 million of losses incurred prior to fiscal 2011, which had not been allocated to segment operating results.

Our largest customer, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates, accounted for approximately 18% of consolidated net sales in both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011, and 18% of consolidated net sales in both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, primarily in the Consumer Foods segment.

Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and its affiliates accounted for approximately 16% of consolidated net receivables as of November 28, 2010 and May 30, 2010, primarily in the Consumer Foods segment.

25

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Part I — Financial Information

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This report, including Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are based on management’s current views and assumptions of future events and financial performance and are subject to uncertainty and changes in circumstances. Readers of this report should understand that these statements are not guarantees of performance or results. Many factors could affect our actual financial results and cause them to vary materially from the expectations contained in the forward-looking statements, including those set forth in this report. These factors include, among other things: availability and prices of raw materials; the impact of the accident at the Garner, North Carolina manufacturing facility, including the ultimate costs incurred and the amounts received under insurance policies; the effectiveness of our product pricing, including any pricing actions and promotional changes; future economic circumstances; industry conditions; our ability to execute our operating plans; the success of our innovation, marketing, and cost savings initiatives; the amount and timing of repurchases of our common stock, if any; the competitive environment and related market conditions; operating efficiencies; the ultimate impact of our product recalls; access to capital; actions of governments and regulatory factors affecting our businesses, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; and other risks described in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We caution readers not to place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements included in this report which speak only as of the date of this report.

The following discussion should be read together with our financial statements and related notes contained in this report and with the financial statements, related notes, and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2010. Results for the thirteen and twenty-six week periods ended November 28, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of results that may be attained in the future.

Fiscal 2011 Second Quarter Executive Overview

ConAgra Foods, Inc. (NYSE: CAG) is one of North America’s leading food companies, with brands in 97% of America’s households. Consumers find Banquet^®, Chef Boyardee^®, Egg Beaters^®, Healthy Choice^®, Hebrew National^®, Hunt’s^®, Marie Callender’s^®, Orville Redenbacher’s^®, PAM^®, Peter Pan^®, Reddi-wip^®, and many other ConAgra Foods brands in grocery, convenience, mass merchandise, and club stores. We also have a strong business-to-business presence, supplying potato, as well as other vegetable, spice, and grain products to a variety of well-known restaurants, foodservice operators, and commercial customers.

Our diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $0.45. Diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $0.54 (including earnings of $0.53 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations). Diluted earnings per share were $0.78 (including $0.77 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations) and $0.91 (including earnings of $0.90 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations), in the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Several significant items affect the comparability of year-over-year results of continuing operations (see “Items Impacting Comparability” below).

Items Impacting Comparability

Segment presentation of gains and losses from derivatives used for economic hedging of anticipated commodity input costs and economic hedging of foreign currency exchange rate risks of anticipated transactions is discussed in the segment review below.

Results for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011 include charges totaling $5 million ($3 million after-tax) and $13 million ($8 million after-tax), respectively, for restructuring costs incurred. Restructuring charges for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 were immaterial.

Acquisitions

In the first quarter of fiscal 2011, we acquired the assets of American Pie, LLC (“American Pie”) a manufacturer of frozen fruit pies, thaw and serve pies, fruit cobblers, and pie crusts under the licensed Marie Callender’s^® and Claim Jumper^® trade names, as well as

26

frozen dinners, pot pies, and appetizers under the Claim Jumper^® trade name. We paid $131 million in cash plus assumed liabilities for this business.

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we completed the acquisition of Elan Nutrition, Inc., a privately held formulator and manufacturer of private label snack and nutrition bars, for $103 million in cash plus assumed liabilities.

Divestiture of Gilroy Dehydrated Vegetable Business

In July 2010, we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ dehydrated garlic, onion, capsicum and Controlled Moisture™, GardenFrost^®, Redi-Made™, and fresh vegetable operations for $246 million in cash. We reflected the results of these operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented.

Garner, North Carolina Accident

On June 9, 2009, an accidental explosion occurred at our manufacturing facility in Garner, North Carolina (the “Garner accident”). This facility was the primary production facility for our Slim Jim^® branded meat snacks. On June 13, 2009, the U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives announced its determination that the explosion was the result of an accidental natural gas release, and not a deliberate act.

We maintain comprehensive property (including business interruption), workers’ compensation, and general liability insurance policies with very significant loss limits that we believe will provide substantial and broad coverage for the currently foreseeable losses arising from this accident.

We recognized charges totaling $8 million and $45 million ($4 million and $34 million in selling, general and administrative expenses, respectively, and $4 million and $11 million in cost of goods sold, respectively) in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively, in connection with the Garner accident. These amounts exclude lost profits from the interruption of the business. We also recognized insurance recoveries of $7 million and $41 million in selling, general and administrative expenses in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively. The costs incurred and insurance recoveries recognized in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011 were not material.

Through November 28, 2010, we had received payment advances from the insurers of $109 million for our initial insurance claims for this matter, $60 million of which has been recognized as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses (primarily in fiscal 2010), largely offsetting the cumulative charges of $64 million recognized to date in connection with the Garner accident. The deferred balance of $49 million is classified as other accrued liabilities within our consolidated balance sheet as of November 28, 2010. We anticipate final settlement of the claim will occur in fiscal 2011. Based on management’s current assessment of production options, the expected level of insurance proceeds, and the estimated potential amount of losses and impact on the Slim Jim^® brand, we do not believe that the Garner accident will have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity. We expect Slim Jim^® profitability to reach pre-accident levels by fiscal 2012.

Restructuring Plans

In March 2010, we announced a plan, authorized by our Board of Directors, related to the long-term production of our meat snack products. The plan provides for the closure of our meat snacks production facility in Garner, North Carolina, and the movement of production to our existing facility in Troy, Ohio. Since the Garner accident, the Troy facility has been producing a portion of our meat snack products. Upon completion of the plan’s implementation, which is expected to be in the second quarter of fiscal 2012, the Troy facility will be our primary meat snacks production facility. This plan is expected to result in the termination of approximately 500 employee positions in Garner and the creation of approximately 200 employee positions in Troy.

In May 2010, we made a decision to move certain administrative functions from Edina, Minnesota, to Naperville, Illinois. We completed the transition of these functions in the first half of fiscal 2011. This plan, together with the plan to move production of our meat snacks from Garner, North Carolina to Troy, Ohio, are collectively referred to as the 2010 restructuring plan (“2010 plan”). In connection with the 2010 plan, we expect to incur pre-tax cash and non-cash charges for asset impairments, accelerated depreciation, severance, relocation, and site closure costs of $70 million (of which $52 million have been incurred to date). Included in these estimates are $30 million of charges that have resulted or will result in cash outflows and $40 million of non-cash charges. In the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011, we recognized charges of $5 million and $13 million, respectively, in relation to these plans.

27

Sweet Potato Investment

In the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we began operations at our new, state-of-the-art processing plant near Delhi, Louisiana, designed primarily to process high-quality sweet potatoes from the region into fries and related products.

Segment Review

We report our operations in two reporting segments: Consumer Foods and Commercial Foods.

Consumer Foods

The Consumer Foods reporting segment includes branded and private label food products that are sold in various retail and foodservice channels, principally in North America. The products include a variety of categories (e.g., meals, entrees, condiments, sides, snacks, and desserts) across frozen, refrigerated, and shelf-stable temperature classes.

Commercial Foods

The Commercial Foods reporting segment includes commercially branded foods and ingredients, which are sold principally to foodservice, food manufacturing, and industrial customers. The segment’s primary products include: specialty potato products, milled grain ingredients, and a variety of vegetable products, seasonings, blends, and flavors, which are sold under brands such as ConAgra Mills^®, Lamb Weston^®, and Spicetec Flavors & Seasonings^TM.

As discussed above, we reflected the results of the Gilroy Foods & Flavors^TM operations as discontinued operations for all periods presented. The assets and liabilities of the divested Gilroy Foods & Flavors^TM dehydrated vegetable business have been classified as assets and liabilities held for sale within our consolidated balance sheet for the period prior to divestiture.

Presentation of Derivative Gains (Losses) for Economic Hedges of Forecasted Cash Flows in Segment Results

Commodity derivatives used to manage commodity input price risk are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We reflect realized and unrealized gains and losses from derivatives (except for those related to our milling operations) used to economically hedge anticipated commodity consumption in earnings immediately within general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are reclassified to segment operating results in the period in which the underlying item being economically hedged is recognized in cost of goods sold.

Foreign currency derivatives used to manage foreign currency risk of forecasted cash flows are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. We believe these derivatives provide economic hedges of the foreign currency risk of certain forecasted transactions. As such, these derivatives are recognized at fair market value with realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in general corporate expenses. The gains and losses are subsequently recognized in the operating results of the reporting segments in the period in which the underlying transaction being economically hedged is included in earnings.

The following table presents the net derivative gains (losses) from economic hedges of forecasted commodity consumption and currency risk of our foreign operations, under this methodology:

28

	Thirteen weeks ended						Twenty-six weeks ended
	November 28,			November 29,			November 28,			November 29,
($ in millions)	2010			2009			2010			2009
Net derivative gains (losses) incurred	$	6.6		$	2.0		$	(1.2	)	$	(14.6	)
Less: Net derivative losses allocated to reporting segments		(2.5	)		(3.8	)		(4.5	)		(13.5	)
Net derivative gains (losses) recognized in general corporate expenses	$	9.1		$	5.8		$	3.3		$	(1.1	)
Net derivative losses allocated to Consumer Foods	$	(1.9	)	$	(2.9	)	$	(3.7	)	$	(8.8	)
Net derivative losses allocated to Commercial Foods		(0.6	)		(0.9	)		(0.8	)		(4.7	)
Net derivative losses included in segment operating profit	$	(2.5	)	$	(3.8	)	$	(4.5	)	$	(13.5	)

Based on our forecasts of the timing of recognition of the underlying hedged items, we expect to reclassify gains of $2 million and losses of $2 million to segment operating results in the second half of fiscal 2011 and 2012 and thereafter, respectively. Amounts allocated, or to be allocated, to segment operating results during fiscal 2011 and thereafter include $3 million of losses incurred prior to fiscal 2011, which had not been allocated to segment operating results.

Net Sales

	Net Sales
	Thirteen weeks ended							Twenty-six weeks ended
($ in millions)	November 28,		November 29,		% Inc			November 28,		November 29,		% Inc
Reporting Segment	2010		2009		(Dec)			2010		2009		(Dec)
Consumer Foods	$	2,104	$	2,078		1	%	$	3,929	$	3,938		—	%
Commercial Foods		1,057		1,022		3	%		2,050		2,048		—	%
Total	$	3,161	$	3,100		2	%	$	5,979	$	5,986		—	%

Net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $3.16 billion, an increase of $61 million, or 2%, from the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Net sales for the first half of fiscal 2011 were $5.98 billion, a decrease of $8 million, or essentially unchanged from the first half of fiscal 2010.

Consumer Foods net sales for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $2.10 billion, an increase of $26 million, or 1%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Results reflected increased volume of 1% (excluding the impact of acquisitions and divestitures) and a 3% benefit from acquisitions (net of divestitures), which were offset by a 3% decline due to net pricing and mix. Consumer Foods net sales for the first half of fiscal 2011 were $3.93 billion, a decrease of $9 million, or essentially unchanged compared to the first half of fiscal 2010. Net sales reflected a 2% increase in net sales from businesses acquired (net of divestitures), essentially flat volume from existing businesses, and a reduction of approximately 2% from net pricing and mix. Sales results in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011 reflected difficult category conditions and a very competitive environment, which necessitated increased promotional spending. Consumer response to promotions was weaker than expected. Volumes were negatively impacted by approximately 1% in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, due to the limited supply of certain Slim Jim^® products as a result of the Garner accident. The effect of foreign currency exchange rates did not have a significant impact on net sales for any of the periods presented.

Sales of products associated with some of our most significant brands, including Healthy Choice^®, Marie Callender’s^®, PAM^®, Ro*Tel^®, Slim Jim^®, and Wesson^® grew in the second quarter of fiscal 2011, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Sales of Slim Jim^® meat snack products increased by 10% and 49% in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011, respectively, as compared to the comparable periods of fiscal 2010, due, in part, to the recovery from lost production capacity caused by the Garner accident during the first quarter of fiscal 2010. Significant brands whose products experienced sales declines in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 include ACT II^®, Banquet^®, Blue Bonnet^®, Chef Boyardee^®, Egg Beaters^®, Hebrew National^®, Hunt’s^®, Kid Cuisine^®, Libby’s^®, Orville Redenbacher’s^®, Peter Pan^®, Snack Pack^®, Swiss Miss^®, and Van Camp’s^®.

29

Commercial Foods net sales were $1.06 billion for the second quarter of fiscal 2011, an increase of $35 million, or 3%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Commercial Foods net sales were $2.05 billion for the first half of fiscal 2011, essentially unchanged compared to the first half of fiscal 2010. Results in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected the pass-through of $16 million of higher wheat prices by the segment’s flour milling operations and increased volume of approximately 5% in the segment’s Lamb Weston specialty potato operations, partially offset by reduced pricing of specialty potato products. Results in the first half of fiscal 2011 reflected the pass-through of lower wheat prices by the flour milling business (largely in the first quarter), resulting in a reduction of net sales of $22 million. Results also reflected higher sales volumes of approximately 4% in our Lamb Weston specialty potato products business, partially offset by reduced net sales prices.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses (Includes general corporate expenses)

Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $428 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2011, a decrease of $28 million, or 6%, as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 reflected the following:

• a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $42 million,

• losses totaling $12 million resulting from a hedge of the fair value of a portion of our outstanding debt and economic hedges of the foreign currency risk of certain financial assets,

• an increase in salaries and wages of $5 million, and

• a decrease in advertising and promotion expenses of $7 million.

Selling, general and administrative expenses for the second quarter of fiscal 2010 included a net benefit of $4 million associated with the Garner accident. Specifically, insurance recoveries more than offset related charges as insurance recoveries are recognized entirely as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses, while related charges are classified within both cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.

Selling, general and administrative expenses totaled $838 million for the first half of fiscal 2011, a decrease of $40 million, or 5%, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2010. Selling, general and administrative expenses for the first half of fiscal 2011 included the following:

• a decrease in incentive compensation expense of $61 million,

• an increase in salaries and wages of $12 million,

• a decrease in advertising and promotion expenses of $13 million,

• losses totaling $8 million resulting from a hedge of the fair value of a portion of our outstanding debt and economic hedges of the foreign currency risk of certain financial assets,

• an increase in the cost of self-insurance of employee health care of $7 million,

• a decrease in stock compensation expense of $5 million, and

• charges of $6 million related to the execution of our restructuring plans.

Selling, general and administrative expenses in the first half of fiscal 2010 included a net benefit of $7 million, associated with the Garner accident. Specifically, insurance recoveries more than offset related charges as insurance recoveries are recognized entirely as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses, while related charges are classified within both cost of goods sold and selling, general and administrative expenses.

30

Operating Profit (Earnings before general corporate expenses, interest expense, net, income taxes, and equity method investment earnings)

	Operating Profit
	Thirteen weeks ended							Twenty-six weeks ended
($ in millions)	November 28,		November 29,		% Inc			November 28,		November 29,		% Inc
Reporting Segment	2010		2009		(Dec)			2010		2009		(Dec)
Consumer Foods	$	284	$	330		(14	)%	$	498	$	580		(14	)%
Commercial Foods		126		151		(16	)%		238		285		(16	)%

Consumer Foods operating profit for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 was $284 million, a decrease of $46 million, or 14%, compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Gross profits were $59 million lower for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 than for the second quarter of fiscal 2010, driven by the impact of higher production costs (particularly for proteins and fuel) and lower sales prices (discussed in Net Sales, above), partially offset by the benefit of supply chain cost savings initiatives. Consumer Foods selling, general and administrative expenses were lower in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 than in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 due to a $14 million decrease in incentive compensation expenses and an $11 million decrease in advertising and promotion expenses. The Consumer Foods segment incurred costs of $5 million in connection with the restructuring plans in the second quarter of fiscal 2011. The weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies resulted in an increase of operating profit of $5 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 as compared to the second quarter of fiscal 2010.

Consumer Foods operating profit for the first half of fiscal 2011 was $498 million, a decrease of $82 million, or 14%, compared to the first half of fiscal 2010. Gross profits were $92 million lower in the first half of fiscal 2011 than in the first half of fiscal 2010 driven by the impact of higher input costs and lower sales prices, discussed above, partially offset by the supply chain cost savings initiatives. Consumer Foods selling, general and administrative expenses were lower in the first half of fiscal 2011 than in the first half of fiscal 2010, reflecting a $19 million decrease in incentive compensation expenses and a $17 million decrease in advertising and promotion expenses. The Consumer Foods segment incurred costs of $13 million in connection with our restructuring plans in the first half of fiscal 2011. The Garner accident in June 2009 resulted in charges totaling $8 million and $45 million for the impairment of property, plant and equipment, inventory write-offs, workers’ compensation, site clean-up, and other related costs in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively. The impact of these charges was partially offset by insurance recoveries of $7 million and $41 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively, for the involuntary conversion of assets. Gross profits from Slim Jim^® branded products were $21 million and $9 million in the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, reflecting the impact of the accident and the subsequent recovery of sales volumes. The weakening of the U.S. dollar relative to foreign currencies resulted in an increase of operating profit of $15 million in the first half of fiscal 2011, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2010.

For the second quarter of fiscal 2011, operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $126 million, a decrease of $25 million, or 16%, from the second quarter of fiscal 2010. Gross profits in the Commercial Foods segment were $26 million lower in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 than in the second quarter of fiscal 2010, driven by higher production costs in our specialty potato operations as a result of poor quality potatoes from the prior year crop, as well as lower selling prices. Lower gross profits were partially offset by lower incentive compensation expenses.

For the first half of fiscal 2011, operating profit for the Commercial Foods segment was $238 million, a decrease of $47 million, or 16%, largely driven by lower gross profit in the specialty potato operations due to the higher costs resulting from a poor quality potato crop. Lower gross profits were partially offset by lower incentive compensation expenses.

Interest Expense, Net

Net interest expense was $34 million and $41 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease reflected a net benefit of $4 million from interest rate swaps used to hedge the fair value of certain of our outstanding debt instruments (effectively converting fixed interest rate debt to variable interest rate debt) and the benefit of the repayment of $248 million of debt in September 2010. Included in net interest expense was $19 million and $20 million of interest income in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, principally from the payment-in-kind notes (the “Notes”) received in connection with the disposition of the trading and merchandising business in June 2008.

Net interest expense was $71 million and $82 million for the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The decrease reflected a net benefit of $8 million from interest rate swaps used to hedge the fair value of certain of our outstanding debt instruments. Included in net interest expense was $38 million and $40 million of interest income in the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, principally from the Notes received in connection with the disposition of the trading and merchandising business in June 2008.

31

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we received $115 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on a portion of the Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity date. On December 6, 2010, subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we received $554 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the remaining Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates. As a result, we will recognize a gain of $25 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2011. We expect net interest expense to be significantly higher for the remainder of fiscal 2011, reflecting lower interest income.

Income Taxes

In the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, our income tax expense was $101 million and $114 million, respectively. The effective tax rate (calculated as the ratio of income tax expense to pre-tax income from continuing operations, inclusive of equity method investment earnings) was approximately 34% and 32% for the second quarters of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. In the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, our income tax expense was $168 million and $203 million, respectively. The effective tax rate was approximately 33% and 34% for the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. The income tax expense for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011 reflected the impact of lower effective state income tax rates, a higher domestic manufacturing deduction, and various changes in estimates. Effective tax rates for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 reflected the benefit of certain income tax credits and deductions identified in this period that related to prior periods. We expect our continuing operations effective tax rate for the full fiscal year 2011 to be approximately 34%.

Equity Method Investment Earnings

Equity method investment earnings were $5 million and $6 million for the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively, while equity method investment earnings were $11 million and $15 million for the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Decreased equity method investment earnings were the result of less profitable operations of potato processing ventures, due to lower sales prices and higher commodity input prices.

Discontinued Operations

Our discontinued operations generated after-tax income of $1 million in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 and 2010, and after-tax income of $3 million and $4 million in the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. Operating results from discontinued operations for the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011 include the impact of a favorable resolution of a foreign tax matter relating to a discontinued business. Losses in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010 reflected charges related to certain legal and environmental matters of divested businesses.

Earnings Per Share

Our diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2011 were $0.45. Diluted earnings per share in the second quarter of fiscal 2010 were $0.54 (including earnings of $0.53 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations). Diluted earnings per share were $0.78 (including $0.77 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations) and $0.91 (including earnings of $0.90 per diluted share from continuing operations and $0.01 per diluted share from discontinued operations), in the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Sources of Liquidity and Capital

Our primary financing objective is to maintain a prudent capital structure that provides us flexibility to pursue our growth objectives. If necessary, we use short-term debt principally to finance ongoing operations, including our seasonal requirements for working capital (accounts receivable, prepaid expenses and other current assets, and inventories, less accounts payable, accrued payroll, and other accrued liabilities) and a combination of equity and long-term debt to finance both our base working capital needs and our noncurrent assets.

At November 28, 2010, we had a $1.5 billion revolving credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions, which matures in December 2011. The facility has historically been used principally as a back-up facility for our commercial paper program. As of November 28, 2010, there were no outstanding borrowings under the facility. We did not draw upon this facility or the commercial paper program during the first half of fiscal 2011. Borrowings under the facility bear interest at or below prime rate and may be

32

prepaid without penalty. The facility requires that our consolidated funded debt not exceed 65% of our consolidated capital base, and that our fixed charges coverage ratio be greater than 1.75 to 1.0. As of November 28, 2010, we were in compliance with these financial covenants.

As of the end of the second quarter of fiscal 2011, our senior long-term debt ratings were all investment grade. A significant downgrade in our credit ratings would not affect our ability to borrow amounts under the revolving credit facility, although borrowing costs would increase. A downgrade of our short-term credit ratings would impact our ability to borrow under our commercial paper program by negatively impacting borrowing costs and causing shorter durations, as well as making access to commercial paper more difficult.

In connection with the divestiture of the trading and merchandising operations in fiscal 2009, we received $550 million (face value) of the Notes issued by the purchaser of the divested business. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we received $115 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on a portion of the Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity date. On December 6, 2010, subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we received $554 million as payment in full of all principal and interest due on the remaining Notes, in advance of the scheduled maturity dates.

We have repurchased our shares of common stock from time to time after considering market conditions and in accordance with repurchase limits authorized by our Board of Directors. In February 2010, our Board of Directors approved a $500 million share repurchase program with no expiration date. We repurchased approximately 4.6 million and 8.8 million shares of our common stock for $100 million and $200 million under this program in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011, respectively. Our Board of Directors has increased the company’s share repurchase authorization by the amount of the early repayment of the Notes. The company’s total remaining share repurchase authorization is now $750 million. The company expects to continue repurchasing its shares over the next few fiscal quarters, subject to market conditions. Repurchases may be completed through negotiated transactions or open market purchases.

In July 2010, we completed the sale of substantially all of the assets of Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ dehydrated garlic, onion, capsicum and Controlled Moisture™, GardenFrost^®, Redi-Made™, and fresh vegetable operations for $246 million in cash.

On September 15, 2010, we repaid the entire principal balance of $248 million of our 7.875% senior notes, due on that date.

On September 17, 2010, our Board of Directors approved an increase in our quarterly dividend to $0.23 per share from the previous level of $0.20 per share.

Cash Flows

During the first half of fiscal 2011, we used $408 million of cash, which included $319 million generated from operating activities, $87 million used in investing activities, and $644 million used in financing activities.

Cash generated from operating activities of continuing operations totaled $316 million in the first half of fiscal 2011, as compared to $685 million generated in the first half of fiscal 2010, reflecting contributions of $112 million to our pension plans in the first half of fiscal 2011, decreased income from continuing operations, and higher incentive compensation payments paid in the first half of fiscal 2011 (primarily related to fiscal 2010 performance) than in the first half of fiscal 2010 (primarily related to fiscal 2009 performance). Lower cash generated from continuing operations for the first half of fiscal 2011, as compared to the first half of fiscal 2010, also reflected a greater increase in finished goods inventory in our Consumer Foods segment due to the strong fiscal 2010 fourth quarter sales that left finished goods levels at the end of fiscal 2010 significantly lower than those at the end of fiscal 2009. As the inventory growth in the Consumer Foods segment during the first half of fiscal 2011 was primarily related to finished goods inventory, the increase in accounts payable over the same period did not fully offset the inventory increase, due to the length of our finished goods production cycle. Cash generated from operating activities of discontinued operations was $3 million in the first half of fiscal 2011, as compared to cash used in operating activities of $27 million in the first half of fiscal 2010, reflecting increased inventory levels in the Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ business that was sold in July 2010.

Cash used in investing activities from continuing operations totaled $333 million in the first half of fiscal 2011, versus cash used in investing activities of $230 million in the first half of fiscal 2010. Investing activities of continuing operations in the first half of fiscal 2011 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $211 million and payments totaling $136 million for the acquisition of American Pie and other intangible assets, partially offset by $13 million of insurance proceeds related to the Garner accident. Investing activities of continuing operations in the first half of fiscal 2010 consisted primarily of capital expenditures of $240 million, partially offset by

33

insurance proceeds of $11 million. We generated $246 million of cash from investing activities of discontinued operations in the first half of fiscal 2011 from the disposition of the Gilroy Foods & Flavors™ business in July 2010.

Cash used in financing activities totaled $644 million and $189 million in the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, respectively. During the first half of fiscal 2011 and 2010, we paid dividends of $176 million and $169 million, respectively. During the first half of fiscal 2011, we decreased our debt by $289 million, including the repayment of the entire principal balance of $248 million of our 7.875% senior notes on September 15, 2010, due on that date, as well as $35 million of bank borrowings by our Lamb Weston BSW potato processing venture. Also in the first half of fiscal 2011, we repurchased $200 million of our common stock as part of our share repurchase program.

We expect significant additional insurance recoveries related to the Garner accident and have received $109 million to date from insurance carriers, including $24 million received in the first half of fiscal 2011.

We estimate our capital expenditures in fiscal 2011 will be approximately $500 million, which will be partly offset by anticipated insurance proceeds related to the Garner accident.

Management believes that existing cash balances, cash flows from operations, the proceeds from the early repayment of the Notes, existing credit facilities, and access to capital markets will provide sufficient liquidity to meet our working capital needs, planned capital expenditures and share repurchases, and payment of anticipated quarterly dividends for at least the next twelve months.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We use off-balance sheet arrangements where the economics and sound business principles warrant their use. We periodically enter into guarantees and other similar arrangements as part of transactions in the ordinary course of business. These are described further in “Obligations and Commitments,” below.

Variable Interest Entities Not Consolidated

We have variable interests in certain entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities, but for which we are not the primary beneficiary. We have not consolidated the financial statements of these entities.

We hold a 50% interest in Lamb Weston RDO, a potato processing venture. We provide all sales and marketing services to Lamb Weston RDO. We receive a fee for these services based on a percentage of the net sales of the venture. We reflect the value of our ownership interest in this venture in other assets, based upon the equity method of accounting. The balance of our investment was $13 million and $14 million at November 28, 2010 and May 30, 2010, respectively, representing our maximum exposure to loss as a result of our involvement with this venture. The capital structure of Lamb Weston RDO includes owners’ equity of $26 million and term borrowings from banks of $45 million as of November 28, 2010. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of this venture.

We lease certain office buildings from entities that we have determined to be variable interest entities. The lease agreements with these entities include fixed-price purchase options for the assets being leased, representing our only variable interest in these lessor entities. These leases are accounted for as operating leases, and accordingly, there are no material assets or liabilities associated with these entities included in our balance sheets. We have no material exposure to loss from our variable interests in these entities. We have determined that we do not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of these entities. In making this determination, we have considered, among other items, the terms of the lease agreements, the expected remaining useful lives of the assets leased, and the capital structure of the lessor entities.

Obligations and Commitments

As part of our ongoing operations, we enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future payments under contracts such as lease agreements, debt agreements, and unconditional purchase obligations (i.e., obligations to transfer funds in the future for fixed or minimum quantities of goods or services at fixed or minimum prices, such as “take-or-pay” contracts). The unconditional purchase obligation arrangements are entered into in our normal course of business in order to ensure adequate levels of sourced product are available. Of these items, debt and capital lease obligations, which totaled $3.3 billion as of November 28, 2010, were recognized as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. Operating lease obligations and unconditional purchase obligations, which totaled $827

34

million as of November 28, 2010, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, were not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet.

A summary of our contractual obligations as of November 28, 2010 was as follows (including obligations of discontinued operations):

	Payments Due by Period
	(in millions)
			Less than						After 5
Contractual Obligations	Total		1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		Years
Long-term debt	$	3,238.5	$	347.2	$	42.6	$	578.4	$	2,270.3
Capital lease obligations		63.1		5.6		8.8		5.6		43.1
Operating lease obligations		356.0		65.4		106.1		67.3		117.2
Purchase obligations		470.8		438.8		20.8		4.6		6.6
Total	$	4,128.4	$	857.0	$	178.3	$	655.9	$	2,437.2

We are also contractually obligated to pay interest on our long-term debt and capital lease obligations. The weighted average interest rate of the long-term debt obligations outstanding as of November 28, 2010 was approximately 6.6%.

The purchase obligations noted in the table above do not reflect $524 million of open purchase orders, some of which are not legally binding. These purchase orders are settleable in the ordinary course of business in less than one year.

As part of our ongoing operations, we also enter into arrangements that obligate us to make future cash payments only upon the occurrence of a future event (e.g., guarantees of debt or lease payments of a third party should the third party be unable to perform). In accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, the following commercial commitments are not recognized as liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet. A summary of our commitments, including commitments associated with equity method investments, as of November 28, 2010 was as follows:

	Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
	(in millions)
			Less than						After 5
Other Commercial Commitments	Total		1 Year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		Years
Guarantees	$	68.1	$	12.4	$	10.9	$	11.9	$	32.9
Other commitments		0.5		0.5		—		—		—
Total	$	68.6	$	12.9	$	10.9	$	11.9	$	32.9

In certain limited situations, we will guarantee an obligation of an unconsolidated entity. We guarantee certain leases and other commercial obligations resulting from the 2002 divestiture of our fresh beef and pork operations. The remaining terms of these arrangements do not exceed five years and the maximum amount of future payments we have guaranteed was $15 million as of November 28, 2010. We have also guaranteed the performance of the divested business with respect to a hog purchase contract. The hog purchase contract requires the divested fresh beef and pork business to purchase a minimum of approximately 1.2 million hogs annually through 2014. The contract stipulates minimum price commitments, based in part on market prices and, in certain circumstances, also includes price adjustments based on certain inputs.

We are a party to various potato supply agreements. Under the terms of certain such potato supply agreements, we have guaranteed repayment of short-term bank loans of the potato suppliers, under certain conditions. At November 28, 2010, the amount of supplier loans effectively guaranteed by us was $7 million, included in the table above. We have not established a liability for these guarantees, as we have determined that the likelihood of our required performance under the guarantees is remote.

We are a party to a supply agreement with an onion processing company. We have guaranteed repayment of a loan of this supplier, under certain conditions. At November 28, 2010, the amount of this loan was $25 million, included in the table above. In the event of default on this loan by the supplier, we have the contractual right to purchase the loan from the lender, thereby giving us the rights to underlying collateral. We have not established a liability in connection with this guarantee, as we believe the likelihood of financial exposure to us under this agreement is remote.

35

The obligations and commitments tables, above, do not include any reserves for income taxes, as we are unable to reasonably estimate the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of our reserves for income taxes. The liability for gross unrecognized tax benefits at November 28, 2010 was $59 million. The net amount of unrecognized tax benefits at November 28, 2010, that, if recognized, would impact our effective tax rate was $37 million. Recognition of this tax benefit would have a favorable impact on our effective tax rate.

Critical Accounting Estimates

A discussion of our critical accounting estimates can be found in the “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” section of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2010.

Other Matters

From time to time, we have used the services of a firm whose chief executive officer serves on our Board of Directors. Payments to this firm for environmental and agricultural engineering services performed and structures acquired totaled $0.1 million and $0.2 million in the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2011, respectively, and $0.1 million for both the second quarter and first half of fiscal 2010, respectively.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The principal market risks affecting us are exposures to price fluctuations of commodity and energy inputs, interest rates, and foreign currencies.

Other than the changes noted below, there have been no material changes in our market risk during the twenty-six weeks ended November 28, 2010. For additional information, refer to the “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk” in Item 7A of our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended May 30, 2010.

Commodity Market Risk

We purchase commodity inputs such as wheat, corn, oats, soybean meal, soybean oil, meat, dairy products, sugar, natural gas, electricity, and packaging materials to be used in our operations. These commodities are subject to price fluctuations that may create price risk. We enter into commodity hedges to manage this price risk using physical forward contracts or derivative instruments. We have policies governing the hedging instruments our businesses may use. These policies include limiting the dollar risk exposure for each of our businesses. We also monitor the amount of associated counter-party credit risk for all non-exchange-traded transactions.

Interest Rate Risk

We may use interest rate swaps to manage the effect of interest rate changes on the fair value of our existing debt as well as the forecasted interest payments for the anticipated issuance of debt. During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2010, we entered into interest rate swap contracts used to hedge the fair value of certain of our senior long-term debt. During the second quarter of fiscal 2011, we terminated these interest rate swap contracts.

Foreign Currency Risk

In order to reduce exposures for our processing activities related to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, we may enter into forward exchange or option contracts for transactions denominated in a currency other than the functional currency for certain of our operations. This activity primarily relates to economically hedging against foreign currency risk in purchasing inventory and capital equipment, sales of finished goods, and future settlement of foreign denominated assets and liabilities.

Value-at-Risk (VaR)

We employ various tools to monitor our derivative risk, including value-at-risk (“VaR”) models. We perform simulations using historical data to estimate potential losses in the fair value of current derivative positions. We use price and volatility information for the prior 90 days in the calculation of VaR that is used to monitor our daily risk. The purpose of this measurement is to provide a single view of the potential risk of loss associated with derivative positions at a given point in time based on recent changes in market prices. Our model uses a 95 percent confidence level. Accordingly, in any given one day time period, losses greater than the amounts included in the table, below, are expected to occur only 5 percent of the time. We include commodity swaps, futures, and options and foreign exchange forwards, swaps, and options in this calculation. The following table provides an overview of our

36

average daily VaR for our energy, agriculture, and other commodities over the twenty-six week period ending November 28, 2010 as well as the average daily foreign exchange VaR. Other commodities may include items such as packaging, livestock, and/or metals.

	Fair Value Impact
	Average		Average
	During Twenty-six Weeks		During Twenty-six Weeks
In Millions	Ended November 28, 2010		Ended November 29, 2009
Energy Commodities	$	1.4	$	1.7
Agriculture Commodities	$	2.2	$	1.6
Other Commodities	$	—	$	0.1
Foreign Exchange	$	1.4	$	0.6

In prior filings, we presented analyses of market risk using a sensitivity analysis methodology. We have begun using a VaR methodology for purposes of this presentation, as this is a methodology used by management in monitoring market risk, and we believe this is a more useful presentation to readers.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of November 28, 2010. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated any change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter covered by this report and determined that there was no change in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting during the quarter covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

37

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Part II — Financial Information

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are party to a number of lawsuits and claims arising out of the operation of our business. After taking into account liabilities recorded for these matters, we believe the ultimate resolution of such matters should not have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or liquidity.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

The following table presents the total number of shares of common stock purchased during the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the average price paid per share, the number of shares that were purchased as part of a publicly announced repurchase program, and the approximate dollar value of the maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the share repurchase program:

					Total Number of Shares		Approximate Dollar
	Total Number		Average		Purchased as Part of		Value of Shares that
	of Shares		Price Paid		Publicly Announced		may yet be Purchased
Period	Purchased		per Share		Programs		under the Programs (1)(2)
August 30 through September 26, 2010		—		—		—	$	300,062,000
September 27 through October 24, 2010		4,588,218	$	21.79		4,588,218	$	200,063,000
October 25 through November 28, 2010		—		—		—	$	200,063,000
Total Fiscal 2011 Second Quarter Activity		4,588,218	$	21.79		4,588,218	$	200,063,000

(1)

Pursuant to publicly announced share repurchase programs since December 2003, we have repurchased approximately 119.3 million shares at a cost of $2.8 billion through November 28, 2010. The current program has no expiration date.

(2)

Subsequent to the second quarter of fiscal 2011, the share repurchase program was increased by $554.2 million, the amount of the early repayment of payment-in-kind notes. See Note 4 to the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for further information on the early repayment. As a result of this increase, the approximate dollar value of shares that may be purchased as of the date of such repayment was $754.3 million.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

All exhibits as set forth on the Exhibit Index, which is incorporated herein by reference.

38

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
By:	/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING
	John F. Gehring
	Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
By:	/s/ PATRICK D. LINEHAN
	Patrick D. Linehan
	Senior Vice President and Corporate Controller

Dated this 3rd day of January, 2011.

39

EXHIBIT	DESCRIPTION	PAGE
10.1*	Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement by and between ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Robert F. Sharpe, Jr. dated November 17, 2010		1
12	Statement regarding computation of ratio of earnings to fixed charges		14
31.1	Section 302 Certificate of Chief Executive Officer		15
31.2	Section 302 Certificate of Chief Financial Officer		16
32.1	Section 906 Certificates		17
101.1	The following materials from ConAgra Foods’ Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 28, 2010, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Earnings, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, (v) Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, and (vi) document and entity information.

* Management contract or compensatory plan.

40

EX-10.1

Exhibit 10.1

SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT

     This Second Amended and Restated Employment Agreement is made by and between ConAgra Foods, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Company”), and Robert F. Sharpe, Jr. (“Employee”), the 17th day of November 2010, but effective as of October 30, 2010 (the “Agreement Date”). The Board of Directors of the Company (“Board”) and Employee desire to amend and restate the September 25, 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between the Company and Employee to make certain changes to the terms and conditions of the agreement between the parties. In order to accomplish this objective, the Human Resources Committee of the Board has caused the Company to enter into this Agreement.

     NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:

1.	Term of Employment. Employee’s term of employment under this Agreement shall continue in accordance with the terms hereof until the termination of Employee’s employment on May 29, 2011.
2.	Position and Duties.

2.1

Position. Employee resigns his position as President, Commercial Foods, effective October 15, 2010, and as of October 15, 2010, is the Company’s Senior Advisor to the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Employee shall have responsibility for projects as assigned by the CEO, including, but not limited to, advisory work on investor relations matters, mergers and acquisitions activity, Board relations, and transition support to the new President, Commercial Foods and the Executive Vice President and Chief Administrative Officer. Employee shall report to the Company’s CEO. Employee shall perform his duties in such locations in the United States as the CEO and Employee shall mutually determine, provided that Employee and the Company agree that Employee’s work may be substantially performed on a telecommuting basis from Employee’s address shown on the records of the Company. Administrative support will be provided by the Company through May 29, 2011.

2.2

Duties. Employee will be expected to work a reduced schedule, at a rate approximating, and not less than, 25% of a full time schedule. Employee shall devote his working time and efforts on behalf of the Company to the performance of the duties outlined above. Employee may, consistent with his duties hereunder, engage in charitable and community affairs, manage his personal investments and serve on the board of directors of Ameriprise Financial, Inc. and, subject to the prior approval of the CEO, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, on the board of directors of other companies.

1

3. Compensation.

3.1	Base Salary. The Company shall pay Employee a Base Salary (“Base Salary”) at the rate of $250,000 per annum, which pay rate shall be effective as of October 30, 2010. The Base Salary shall be payable in accordance with the ordinary payroll practices of the Company.
3.2	Annual Incentive Bonus. Employee shall be entitled to receive an annual bonus under the Company’s Management Incentive Plan (“Annual Bonus Plan”), or any successor plan subsequently available for fiscal year 2011 to senior executive officers. Employee’s target bonus opportunity under the Annual Bonus Plan shall not be less than 100% of Employee’s total salary earned for fiscal year 2011. The performance goals with respect to such target bonus opportunity shall be as established by the Human Resources Committee of the Board for fiscal year 2011, based on such goals that have been recommended by the CEO and on a basis consistent with the establishment of such performance goals for senior executive officers of the Company. The actual bonus awarded to Employee will be at least equal to the funding level for the Annual Bonus Plan authorized by the Board of Directors for the version of the plan applicable to senior corporate employees generally. The Board of Directors retains the discretion to increase Employee’s actual award above the funded level, based on his individual performance, but not beyond the maximum award authorized for Employee for Internal Revenue Code Section 162(m) purposes. Employee agrees he must sign, and not revoke, a full waiver and release of claims in the Company’s standard form as a condition precedent to the receipt of his fiscal 2011 Annual Bonus Plan award.
3.3	Long Term Senior Management Incentive Plans. Employee participates or has participated in the Company’s Executive Incentive Plan, 2006 Stock Plan, 2006 Performance Share Plan, 2008 Performance Share Plan and other or successor incentive plans available from time to time to senior executive officers at levels determined by the Human Resource Committee of the Board of Directors and commensurate with the Employee’s position. Each such Plan, together with the Company’s Long-Term Senior Management Incentive Program and any other equity-based or other incentive program under which Employee has received or receives long-term awards, are collectively referred to as the “LTSMIP”. The terms of Employee’s LTSMIP awards shall be governed by the terms thereof.

4. Other Benefits

4.1 Employee Benefit Plans. The Company shall provide Employee and his eligible dependents with coverage under all employee benefit programs, plans and practices in which the Employee is eligible given his new position and work schedule, in accordance with the terms thereof. Employee acknowledges and understands that on or after October 30, 2010, he will not be eligible to receive benefits under the Company’s health insurance and related welfare plans, Company paid life insurance plan, supplemental life insurance plan, and/or STD and LTD plans.

2

4.2	Non-Qualified Plans. Employee participates in the Company’s Non-Qualified Pension Plan (the “Non-Qualified Plan”) and Non-Qualified CRISP Plan (“Non-Qualified CRISP Plan”). For purposes of the Non-Qualified Plan, except as set forth below, years of service for purposes of calculating benefits will be credited at a three-for-one rate until Employee has service credit of thirty years, and Employee’s benefits thereunder shall be determined using the prior benefit formula as in effect under the qualified pension plan during 2004 (described as Option (A) in the Company’s August 2008 Proxy Statement). Notwithstanding the foregoing, (x) in the event of voluntary termination or retirement prior to attainment of age 60, a crediting rate of two-for-one shall apply in lieu of the three-for-one rate, and (y) the Board must approve a voluntary termination or retirement before November 7, 2010 and, in the event of such termination or retirement without approval by the Board, the Employee will not be entitled to any benefits under the Non-Qualified Plan or the Non-Qualified CRISP Plan. In the event of termination for “Cause”, the Employee will not be entitled to any benefits under the Non-Qualified Plan or the Non-Qualified CRISP Plan. Employee acknowledges and understands that he will not be eligible for a Company contribution under the Non-Qualified CRISP Plan for any calendar year in which he is not employed on December 31st.
4.3	Directors and Officers Liability Coverage. For acts occurring prior to October 15, 2010, Employee shall be entitled to the same coverage under the Company’s directors and officers liability insurance policies as is available to senior executive officers and directors with the Company. In any event, the Company shall indemnify and hold Employee harmless, to the fullest extent permitted by the laws of the State of Delaware, from and against all costs, charges and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) incurred or sustained in connection with any action, suit or proceeding to which Employee or his legal representatives may be made a party by reason of Employee’s being or having been a director, officer or employee of the company or any of its affiliates or employee benefit plans. The provisions of this subparagraph shall not be deemed exclusive of any other rights to which Employee seeking indemnification may have under any by-law, agreement, vote of stockholders or directors, or otherwise. The provisions of this paragraph shall survive the termination of this Agreement for any reason.
4.4	Expenses. Employee is authorized to incur reasonable expenses in carrying out his duties under this Agreement, including expenses for travel, long-distance telephone, IT services, and similar items related to such duties. The Company shall reimburse Employee for all such expenses upon presentation by Employee from time to time of an itemized account of such expenditures. Notwithstanding the foregoing, effective November 1, 2010, the Company shall not reimburse Employee for travel expenses (except to the extent such reimbursements are approved in advance by the CEO).
4.5	Reimbursement and In-Kind Benefit Rules. Any reimbursements or in-kind benefits to be provided pursuant to this Agreement (including but not limited to Sections 4.4 and 9) that are taxable to Employee shall be subject to the following

3

	restrictions: (a) each reimbursement must be paid no later than the last day of the calendar year following the Employee’s tax year during which the expense was incurred; and (b) the amount of expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in kind benefits provided, during a tax year of the Employee may not affect the expenses eligible for reimbursement, or in-kind benefits to be provided, in any other tax year of the Employee; (c) the period during which any reimbursement may be paid or in-kind benefit may be provided is the ten years after termination of this Agreement; and (d) the right to reimbursement or in-kind benefits is not subject to liquidation or exchange for another benefit.
4.6	Other Policies. The Company and Employee have entered into an Executive Time Sharing Agreement relating to Employee’s personal use of Company-provided aircraft. Such Executive Time Sharing Agreement is cancelled by the parties as of November 30, 2010.
4.7	Change of Control Benefits.

(a)	The Employee has entered into that certain Amended and Restated Change of Control Agreement effective as of January 1, 2009 (the “CoC Agreement”), which shall terminate in accordance with its terms upon the earlier to occur of October 30, 2010 and the date hereof.
(b)	If a Change of Control (as defined below) occurs prior to May 29, 2011, or the Company enters into a definitive agreement prior to May 29, 2011, the consummation of which will result in a Change of Control, the Company shall ensure the assumption of this Agreement by its successor.
(c)	“Change of Control” means:

(i)

Individuals who constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Board”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board, provided that any person becoming a director subsequent to the date hereof whose election or nomination for election by the Company’s shareholders, was approved by a vote of at least a majority of the directors then comprising the Incumbent Board shall be, for purposes of this Agreement, considered as though such person were a member of the Incumbent Board; or

(ii)

Consummation of a reorganization, merger or consolidation, in each case with respect to which persons who were the shareholders of the Company immediately prior to such reorganization, merger or consolidation do not, immediately thereafter, own more than fifty percent (50%) of the combined voting power entitled to vote generally in the election of directors of the reorganized, merged or consolidated company’s then outstanding voting securities, or a liquidation or dissolution of the Company or the sale of all or substantially all of its assets.

4

(d) Rabbi Trust: Within sixty (60) days following the Change of Control, an amount equal to the net present value (determined in good faith by the plan administrator under the Company’s Non-Qualified Plan) of the Non- Qualified Plan benefits described in Section 4.2 of this Agreement shall be deposited, in one lump sum payment, in a trust in the form of the model grantor trust contained in IRS Revenue Procedure 92-64, which trust is incorporated by reference; provided, however, that such deposit shall be made only to the extent that payment of the Non-Qualified Plan benefits described in Section 4.2 has not already been made by the Company. The acquirer, the Company, and its subsidiaries shall make up any Non-Qualified Plan benefits described in Section 4.2 the Employee does not receive from the trust, e.g., if the funds in the trust are insufficient to make the payments due to insufficient earnings in the trust. The trustee of such trust shall be a national or state chartered bank.

4.8

Stock Ownership. During the period of his employment hereunder, the Employee agrees to comply with the Company’s executive stock ownership guidelines as existing from time to time, and which currently prohibit Employee from selling any             shares of Company common stock except (i) shares, the proceeds of which are used to pay taxes resulting from the vesting or exercise of options, and (ii) sales, so long as, immediately following such sale, Employee owns shares of Company common stock (as determined under the Company’s share ownership guidelines, as modified from time to time) with a value (as determined under the Company’s share ownership guidelines, as modified from time to time) equal to or in excess of four (4) times Employee’s annual Base Salary.

4.9

Post-Retirement Benefits.

(a)

Upon termination of employment following November 7, 2010, or, if earlier, due to death or disability, or involuntary termination without Cause, Employee will be deemed eligible for early and normal retirement (“Retiree Eligible”) under all pension (other than qualified pension plans), welfare benefit, the LTSMIP and any other equity incentive plans and programs applicable to Employee.

(b)

So long as Employee is Retiree Eligible, Employee (his wife and other covered dependents) shall be provided post-employment COBRA-equivalent medical coverage, at Employee’s after-tax expense, until each of Employee and his wife, respectively, attain age 65 (and other covered dependents otherwise would cease to be eligible for coverage). This benefit would fill gaps in Company-provided retiree plan coverage.

5. Separation from Service. The Company may terminate Employee’s employment at any time for Cause, and Employee may terminate his employment at any time for any reason, subject to the terms of this Section 5. For purposes of this Section 5, the following terms shall have the following meanings:

5

(a)	“Cause” shall be limited to (i) action by Employee involving willful malfeasance in connection with his employment having a material adverse effect on the Company, (ii) substantial and continuing refusal by Employee in willful breach of this Agreement to perform the duties assigned to him, which refusal has a material adverse effect on the Company, or (iii) Employee being convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude under the laws of the United States or any state.
(b)	“Permanent Disability” shall mean Employee is, by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment which can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than twelve (12) months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three (3) months under the Company’s long-term disability plan.
(c)	“Separation from Service”, “termination of employment” and similar references shall mean the date that Employee’s employment with the Company terminates under circumstances that constitute a separation from service within the meaning of Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. Generally, Employee will incur a Separation from Service if the Employee dies, retires, or otherwise has a termination of employment with the Company, determined in accordance with the following:

(i) Leaves of Absence. The employment relationship is treated as continuing intact while Employee is on military leave, sick leave, or other bona fide leave of absence if the period of such leave does not exceed six (6) months, or, if longer, so long as Employee retains a right to reemployment with the Company under an applicable statute or by contract (including but not limited to this Agreement). A leave of absence constitutes a bona fide leave of absence only if there is a reasonable expectation that Employee will return to perform services for the Company. If the period of leave exceeds six (6) months and Employee does not retain a right to reemployment under an applicable statute or by contract, the employment relationship is deemed to terminate on the first date immediately following such six (6) month period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, where a leave of absence is due to any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than six (6) months, where such impairment causes Executive to be unable to perform the duties of his or her position of employment or any substantially similar position of employment, a twenty nine (29) month period of absence shall be substituted for such six (6) month period. However, Employee acknowledges and understands that a leave of absence shall not extend his termination of employment beyond May 29, 2011.

6

(ii)	Dual Status. Generally, if Employee performs services both as an employee and an independent contractor, Employee must separate from service both as an employee, and as an independent contractor pursuant to standards set forth in Treasury Regulations, to be treated as having a Separation from Service. However, if Employee provides services to the Company as an employee and as a member of the Board, and if any plan in which such person participates as a Board member is not aggregated with this Agreement pursuant to Treasury Regulation section 1.409A-1(c)(2)(ii), then the services provided as a director are not taken into account in determining whether Employee has a Separation from Service as an employee for purposes of this Agreement.
(iii)	Termination of Employment. Whether Separation from Service has occurred is determined based on whether the facts and circumstances indicate that the Company and the Employee reasonably anticipated that no further services would be performed after a certain date or that the level of bona fide services Executive would perform after such date (whether as an employee or as an independent contractor except as provided in clause (ii) above) would permanently decrease to no more than twenty (20) percent of the average level of bona fide services performed (whether as an employee or an independent contractor, except as provided in clause (ii) above) over the immediately preceding thirty six (36) month period (or the full period of services to the Company if Executive has been providing services to the Company less than thirty six (36) months). For periods during which Employee is on a paid bona fide leave of absence and has not otherwise terminated employment as described above, for purposes of this clause (iii) Employee is treated as providing bona fide services at a level equal to the level of services that the Employee would have been required to perform to receive the compensation paid with respect to such leave of absence. Periods during which Employee is on an unpaid bona fide leave of absence and has not otherwise terminated employment are disregarded for purposes of this clause (iii) (including for purposes of determining the applicable thirty six (36) month (or shorter) period).
(iv)	Service with Related Companies. For purposes of determining whether a Separation from Service has occurred under the above provisions, the “Company” shall include the Company and all Related Companies.

(e) “Related Companies” shall mean: (i) any corporation that is a member of a controlled group of corporations (as defined in Code Section 414(b)) that includes the Company; and (ii) any trade or business (whether or not incorporated) that is under common control (as defined in Code

7

Section 414(c)) with the Company. For purposes of applying Code §§ 414(b) and (c), 25% is substituted for the 80% ownership level.

5.1

Termination Upon Death or Permanent Disability. In the event of a Separation from Service by reason of Employee’s death or Permanent Disability (i) all options and other awards granted in connection with the LTSMIP other than LTSMIP awards with respect to which vesting is determined based upon performance (including but not limited to performance share awards or options that vest based upon performance), shall become fully vested, and all vested options will be exercisable during the remainder of the term of such options, (ii) all deferred compensation (not including retirement benefits) shall be paid to Employee’s estate or designated beneficiary in accordance with the terms of such deferred compensation (iii) Employee and his dependents shall continue to participate in the Company’s employee benefit plans in which Employee was eligible to participate at the time of his death or Permanent Disability to the extent provided in such plans with respect to the death or Permanent Disability of senior officers of the Company, (iv) Employee’s Base Salary shall be paid (subject to any applicable deferral election) through May 29, 2011, together with any accrued, but unused, vacation pay, and (v) Employee shall receive (subject to any applicable deferral election) a benefit under the Annual Bonus Plan, and the LTSMIP; in the case of the Annual Bonus Plan, the benefit will be pro rated based on completed days during the applicable fiscal year, and in the case of the LTSMIP the benefit will be prorated based upon fiscal years completed prior to death or disability; also, in the case of death, the benefit will be based on target, and in the case of disability the benefit will be based on actual performance for the performance period during which disability occurs as set forth in the applicable plan; and in all cases the benefits shall be paid at the time set forth in the applicable plan.

5.2

Termination Without Cause. If there is a Separation from Service initiated by the Company without Cause in addition to being Retiree Eligible under Section 4.9(a) of this Agreement, (i) Employee’s Base Salary shall be paid (subject to any applicable deferral election) through May 29, 2011, together with any accrued, but unused, vacation pay, (ii) Employee’s pension benefit under the Non-Qualified Plan shall be paid at the time applicable based on the terms of the Non-Qualified Plan but the amount of the benefit shall be based on the amount accrued to the date of termination, plus the additional amount that would have accrued through May 29, 2011, if Employee would have remained employed and received compensation described in clause (i) above and (iii) below, such pension benefit to be paid in accordance with the Non-Qualified Plan, (iii) Employee shall be paid an amount equal to the Annual Bonus Plan award contemplated by Section 3.2 above, when bonuses are paid to other senior officers (but no later than two and one-half months after the end of the fiscal year with respect to which such bonus is determined); and (v) Employee and his dependents shall be entitled to continued participation (at Employee’s after-tax expense for the entire cost of coverage to the extent necessary to avoid Employee recognizing taxable income related to benefits provided by such coverage under Internal Revenue Code

8

	Section 105(h)) in all health and welfare plans or programs that are exempt from 409A in which Employee and such dependents were participating on the date of the termination until the earlier of (a) the second anniversary of termination of employment, and (b) the date, or dates, Executive receives equivalent coverage and benefits under the plans and programs of a subsequent employer (such coverages and benefits to be determined on a coverage-by-coverage, or benefit-by-benefit basis); provided that, to the extent Employee is precluded from continuing participation in any such plan or program as provided in this Section or must pay the expense thereof, the Company shall pay to Employee an amount equal to the sum of (x) with respect to insured benefits, the present value (discounted using the then published 2-year Treasury rate) of the premiums expected for coverage or that would be paid by Employee if Employee were to continue coverage at his expense pursuant hereto, less any active employee portion of the premiums, plus (y) with respect to benefits not insured, the present value (discounted using the then published 2-year Treasury rate) of the expected gross cost per employee to the Company to provide such benefits less active employee contributions.
5.3	Termination With Cause or by Employee’s Voluntary Resignation. If there is a Separation from Service initiated by the Company with Cause, or resulting from Employee voluntarily initiating a Separation from Service, then (i) Employee shall be paid the Base Salary through the month of termination, and (ii) Employee shall receive benefits, if any, under Company plans in accordance with the terms of such plans.
5.4	Timing of Payments. Subject to Section 5.5 below, all cash payments required hereunder following death, Permanent Disability or any other Separation from Service shall be made within fifteen days following such Separation from Service; provided, that (i) payments under the Annual Bonus Plan or the LTSMIP pursuant to Sections 3.2, 5.1(v) or 5.2(iii) shall be made following (a) with respect to the Annual Bonus Plan payment, delivery of the full waiver and release of claims referenced in Section 3.2 within 60 days after May 29, 2011, and (b) the end of the applicable fiscal year or other performance period at the same time as such payments are made to the Company’s other Employees participating in such plans (but no later than, under either (a) or (b), two and one-half months after the end of the fiscal year or performance period with respect to which such bonus or LTSMIP amount is determined) and (ii) payments under the non-qualified retirement or deferred compensation plans shall be made in accordance with the provisions of such plans.
5.5	Six Month Wait. Notwithstanding anything contained in this Agreement to the contrary, if the Employee is a “specified employee” (determined in accordance with Code Section 409A and Treasury Regulation Section 1.409A-3(i)(2)) as of the date of Separation from Service (other than a Separation from Service due to death), then (i) any payment, benefit or entitlement provided for in this Agreement that is payable upon Separation from Service and during the first six months following the date of Separation from Service shall be paid or provided to

9

the Employee in a lump sum cash payment to be made on the earlier of (a) the Employee’s death or (b) the first business day (or within 30 days after such first business day) of the seventh calendar month immediately following the month in which the date of Separation from Service occurs, and (ii) any other payment referred to in clauses (i) and (ii) of Section 5.4 shall be paid as provided therein. If any payment is delayed pursuant to this Section 5.5, the Company shall pay interest at the rate described below on the postponed payments from the date the payment would have been due but for this Section 5.5 to the date on which such amounts are paid. Interest shall be credited at an annual rate equal to the rate announced by Wells Fargo & Company (or its successor) as its “prime rate” as of the date the payment would have been due but for this Section 5.5, plus one percent (1%), compounded annually.

5.6

Code Section 409A. It is intended by the Company and Employee that all compensation and benefits payable or provided to the Employee under this Agreement or otherwise shall fully comply with the provisions of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code and the Treasury Regulations relating thereto so as not to subject Employee to the additional tax, interest or penalties which may be imposed under Section 409A. The parties acknowledge that 409A is ambiguous in certain respects. The Company agrees that it will attempt in good faith not to take any action, or refrain from taking any action, that would result in the imposition of tax, interest and/or penalties upon the Employee under 409A. To the extent the Company has acted or refrained from acting in good faith as required by this Section, it will not be responsible for any consequences of failure to comply with 409A.

6.

Nondisclosure of Confidential Information. Employee shall not, without the prior written consent of the Company, disclose any Company Confidential Information except (i) in the business of and for the benefit of the Company, while employed by the Company, or (ii) when required to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction, by any administrative body or legislative body. “Confidential Information” shall mean non-public information concerning the Company’s financial data, strategic business plans, product development and other proprietary information, except for items which have become publicly available information or are otherwise known to the public. Confidential Information does not include information the disclosure of which could not reasonably be expected to adversely affect the business of the Company.

7.

Noncompetition/Non-Solicitation.

(a)	From the Agreement Date through a period ending one year following the termination of the employment of Employee with the Company for any reason (the “Restricted Period”), Employee shall not be an executive officer, board member, 5% or greater owner or partner, or employee of a food company with revenues over $1 billion.
(b)	During the Restricted Period, Employee will not directly or through others, without the prior written consent of the Board (i) directly or

10

indirectly recruit, hire, solicit or induce, or attempt to induce, any employee of the Company or its associated companies to terminate their employment with or otherwise cease their relationship with the Company or its associated companies, or (ii) solicit business or customers of the Company.

(c)

Employee agrees that any breach of the covenants contained in this Section 7, and the covenants contained in the preceding Section 6, will irreparably injure the Company, and accordingly the Company may, in addition to pursing any other remedies available at law or in equity, obtain an injunction against Employee from any court having jurisdiction over the matter, restraining any further violation of such provisions by Employee.

	Employee acknowledges and agrees that the provisions of this Section 7 are reasonable and valid in duration and scope and in all other respects. If any court determines that any provision of this Section is unenforceable because of duration or scope of such provision, such court shall have the power to reduce the scope or duration of such provision, as the case may be, and, in its reduced form, such provision shall then be enforceable.
8.	Offsets. In the event of a Company breach of this Agreement, Employee shall not be required to mitigate damages nor shall the payments due Employee hereunder be reduced or offset by reason of any payments Employee may receive from any other source or by any amounts owing by Employee to the Company.
9.	Separability; Legal Fees. If any provision of this Agreement shall be declared to be invalid or unenforceable, in whole or in part, then such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect the remaining provisions hereof which shall remain in full force and effect. In addition, the Company shall pay to Employee as incurred all legal and accounting fees and expenses incurred by Employee in seeking to obtain or enforce any right or benefit provided by this Agreement or any other compensation-related plan, agreement or arrangement of the Company, unless Employee’s claim is found by a court of competent jurisdiction to have been frivolous.
10.	Assignment. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs and representatives of Employee and the assigns and successors of the Company, but neither this Agreement nor any rights hereunder shall be assignable or otherwise subject to hypothecation by Employee (except by will or by operation of the laws of intestate succession) or the Company, except that the Company shall assign this Agreement to any successor (whether by merger, purchase or otherwise) to all or substantially of the stock, assets or businesses of the Company.
11.	Amendment. This Agreement may only be amended by mutual written agreement between the Company and Employee.

11

12. Notices. All notices or communications hereunder shall be in writing, addressed as follows:

To the Company:	ConAgra Foods, Inc.
	One ConAgra Drive
	Omaha, Nebraska 68102
	Attn: Corporate Secretary
To Employee:	At the address shown on the records of the Company

	Any such notice or communication shall be sent certified or registered mail, return receipt requested, postage prepaid, addressed as above (or to such other address as such party may designate in a notice duly delivered as described above), and the actual date of mailing shall determine the date at which notice was given.
13.	Governing Law. This Agreement shall be construed, interpreted and governed in accordance with the laws of Delaware without reference to such state’s rules relating to conflicts of law.
14.	Arbitration. Any controversy or claim arising out of this Agreement or any breach shall be resolved by arbitration pursuant to this Section and the then current rules of the American Arbitration Association. The arbitration shall be held in Omaha, Nebraska before three arbitrators who are knowledgeable of employment law. If the parties cannot agree on the appointment, then one arbitrator shall be appointed by the Company, one by the Employee, and the third shall be appointed by the first two arbitrators. The arbitrator’s decision and award shall be final and binding and may be entered in any court having jurisdiction thereof. The arbitrator shall not have the power to award punitive or exemplary damages. Each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees associated with the arbitration and other costs and expenses of the arbitration shall be borne as provided by the rules of the American Arbitration Association; provided, however, that unless the arbitrators determine the position of the Employee was frivolous, then Employee shall be entitled to reimbursement for reasonable attorneys’ fees and expenses and arbitration expenses incurred in connection with the dispute. If any portion of this paragraph is held to be unenforceable, then it shall be severed and shall not affect either the duty to arbitrate or any other part of this paragraph. The Company may seek interim injunctive relief to enforce restrictive covenants pending resolution of any arbitration.
15.	Employee Representation. The Employee represents and warrants to the Company that the Employee is not a party to or bound by, and the employment of the Employee by the Company or the Employee’s disclosure of any information to the Company or its use of such information will not violate or breach any employment, retainer, consulting, license, non-competition, non-disclosure, trade secrets or other agreement between the Employee and any other person, partnership, corporation, joint venture, association or other entity.
16.	Entire Agreement. This Agreement supersedes the September 25, 2008 Amended and Restated Employment Agreement and any unwritten agreements or understandings by

12

and between the Employee and the Company and any of its Affiliates or their respective directors, officers, shareholders, employees, attorneys, agents, or representatives, and, together with the agreements, plans and programs referred to herein, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties, respecting the subject matter hereof and there are no representations, warranties or other commitments other than those expressed herein. If there is a conflict between any provision of this Agreement and any provision of any Company plan or agreement pursuant to which employee benefits are provided to Employee, including any stock option or other award agreement, then the provision most favorable to Employee will control. Employee acknowledges that certain plans maintained by the Company must comply with ERISA, the Internal Revenue Code and the terms and conditions of the plans (“Qualified Plans”). Nothing contained in this Agreement will require the Company to provide any benefit contrary to the terms and conditions of the Qualified Plans or in violation of ERISA or the Internal Revenue Code. To the extent any benefit to be provided hereunder to the Employee cannot be provided through a Qualified Plan, the Company will provide the benefit on a non-qualified basis.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement the 17th day of November 2010, to be effective as of the date first above written.

THIS CONTRACT CONTAINS AN ARBITRATION PROVISION WHICH MAY BE ENFORCED BY THE PARTIES.

CONAGRA FOODS, INC.
By:	/s/ Gary M. Rodkin
	President and Chief Executive Officer
/s/ Robert F. Sharpe, Jr.
Robert F. Sharpe, Jr.

13

EX-12

Exhibit 12

ConAgra Foods, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges
($ in millions)

	Twenty-six
	weeks ended
	November 28, 2010
Earnings:
Income from continuing operations before income taxes and equity method investment earnings	$	502.5
Add (deduct):
Fixed charges		135.6
Distributed income of equity method investees		8.1
Capitalized interest		(7.0	)
Earnings available for fixed charges (a)	$	639.2
Fixed charges:
Interest expense	$	109.7
Capitalized interest		7.0
One third of rental expense (1)		18.9
Total fixed charges (b)	$	135.6
Ratio of earnings to fixed charges (a/b)		4.7

(1) Considered to be representative of interest factor in rental expense.

14

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

I, Gary M. Rodkin, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 28, 2010 of ConAgra Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 3, 2011

/s/ GARY M. RODKIN Gary M. Rodkin

Chief Executive Officer

15

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

I, John F. Gehring, certify that:

1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 28, 2010 of ConAgra Foods, Inc.;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a) Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant’s disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant’s most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant’s other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant’s auditors and the audit committee of the registrant’s board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a) All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant’s ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b) Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant’s internal control over financial reporting.

Date: January 3, 2011

/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING John F. Gehring

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

16

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

     I, Gary M. Rodkin, Chief Executive Officer of ConAgra Foods, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that ConAgra Foods, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 28, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ConAgra Foods, Inc. as of and for the periods presented.

January 3, 2011

/s/ GARY M. RODKIN Gary M. Rodkin

Chief Executive Officer

     I, John F. Gehring, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of ConAgra Foods, Inc., certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, to my knowledge that ConAgra Foods, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 28, 2010 fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and that the information contained in such Quarterly Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of ConAgra Foods, Inc. as of and for the periods presented.

January 3, 2011

/s/ JOHN F. GEHRING John F. Gehring

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

     A signed original of this written statement required by Section 906 has been provided to ConAgra Foods, Inc. and will be retained by ConAgra Foods, Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon request.

17