-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE----- Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov Originator-Key-Asymmetric: MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA, REiHX2ZN2yGSY1mya7FP0dOXOGwMhHUQ8vXU5ILAtV+/r/Y2o3P6Ja8TG/Qsd18T IXfBKQzwOZU8aqbih9DaQw== 0000225775-04-000008.txt : 20041115 0000225775-04-000008.hdr.sgml : 20041115 20041115120226 ACCESSION NUMBER: 0000225775-04-000008 CONFORMED SUBMISSION TYPE: 10-Q PUBLIC DOCUMENT COUNT: 4 CONFORMED PERIOD OF REPORT: 20040930 FILED AS OF DATE: 20041115 DATE AS OF CHANGE: 20041115 FILER: COMPANY DATA: COMPANY CONFORMED NAME: PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV LTD CENTRAL INDEX KEY: 0000225775 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLASSIFICATION: LESSORS OF REAL PROPERTY, NEC [6519] IRS NUMBER: 953192402 STATE OF INCORPORATION: CA FISCAL YEAR END: 1231 FILING VALUES: FORM TYPE: 10-Q SEC ACT: 1934 Act SEC FILE NUMBER: 000-08908 FILM NUMBER: 041142912 BUSINESS ADDRESS: STREET 1: 701 WESTERN AVE STREET 2: SUITE 200 CITY: GLENDALE STATE: CA ZIP: 91201-2397 BUSINESS PHONE: (818) 244-8080 MAIL ADDRESS: STREET 1: 701 WESTERN AVE STREET 2: SUITE 200 CITY: GLENDALE STATE: CA ZIP: 91201 10-Q 1 prop4thirdq10q.txt PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV 10Q UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-Q [X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the period ended September 30, 2004 or [ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 For the transition period from ____________ to ____________ Commission File Number 0-8908 PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV, LTD. (Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) California 95-3192402 - ------------------------------------- ---------------------------- (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification Number) 701 Western Avenue, Glendale, California 91201-2349 - ------------------------------------- ---------------------------- (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (818) 244-8080. -------------- Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. [X] Yes [ ] No Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). [ ] Yes [X] No The Registrant is a limited partnership and issues units representing ownership of limited partner interests, with a par value of $500.00 per unit. Number of units outstanding at November 15, 2004: 40,000. PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV, LTD. INDEX Pages PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (Item 3 not applicable) --------------------- Item 1. Financial Statements Condensed Balance Sheets at September 30, 2004 and December 31, 2003 1 Condensed Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income for the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 2 Condensed Statement of Partners' Equity for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 3 Condensed Statements of Cash Flows for the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2004 and 2003 4 Notes to Condensed Financial Statements 5-10 Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations 11-13 Item 2A. Risk Factors 13-15 Item 4. Controls and Procedures 15-16 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION (Items 2 - 5 not applicable) ----------------- Item 1. Legal Proceedings 17 Item 6. Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K 18 PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV, LTD. CONDENSED BALANCE SHEETS
September 30, December 31, 2004 2003 ---------------- ---------------- (Unaudited) ASSETS ------ Cash and cash equivalents $ 2,746,000 $ 1,587,000 Marketable securities of affiliate (cost of $6,340,000) 19,277,000 16,945,000 Rent and other receivables 118,000 194,000 Real estate facilities, at cost: Buildings and equipment 18,681,000 18,373,000 Land 5,021,000 5,021,000 ---------------- ---------------- 23,702,000 23,394,000 Less accumulated depreciation (17,166,000) (16,643,000) ---------------- ---------------- 6,536,000 6,751,000 Other assets 97,000 49,000 ---------------- ---------------- Total assets $ 28,774,000 $ 25,526,000 ================ ================ LIABILITIES AND PARTNERS' EQUITY -------------------------------- Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $ 468,000 $ 170,000 Deferred revenue 289,000 286,000 Commitments and contingencies (Note 5) - - Partners' equity: Limited partners' equity, $500 per unit, 40,000 units authorized, issued and outstanding 11,197,000 10,740,000 General partners' equity 3,883,000 3,725,000 Other comprehensive income 12,937,000 10,605,000 ---------------- ---------------- Total partners' equity 28,017,000 25,070,000 ---------------- ---------------- Total liabilities and partners' equity $ 28,774,000 $ 25,526,000 ================ ================
See accompanying notes 1
PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV, LTD. CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED) Three Months Ended Nine Months Ended September 30, September 30, --------------------------------- ---------------------------------- 2004 2003 2004 2003 ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- REVENUES: Rental income $ 2,616,000 $ 2,542,000 $ 7,721,000 $ 7,399,000 Dividends from marketable securities of affiliate 179,000 179,000 538,000 538,000 Other income 26,000 20,000 69,000 60,000 Revenues from affiliate under performance agreement 297,000 277,000 809,000 753,000 ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- 3,118,000 3,018,000 9,137,000 8,750,000 ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- COSTS AND EXPENSES: Cost of operations 633,000 592,000 1,962,000 1,814,000 Management fees paid to affiliate 157,000 172,000 463,000 444,000 Depreciation 141,000 241,000 523,000 722,000 Administrative 23,000 18,000 79,000 80,000 ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- 954,000 1,023,000 3,027,000 3,060,000 ---------------- --------------- --------------- ---------------- NET INCOME: $ 2,164,000 $ 1,995,000 $ 6,110,000 $ 5,690,000 ================ =============== =============== ================ Limited partners' share of net income ($117.23 per unit in 2004 and $106.83 per unit in 2003) $ 4,689,000 $ 4,273,000 General partners' share of net income 1,421,000 1,417,000 --------------- ---------------- $ 6,110,000 $ 5,690,000 =============== ================ COMPREHENSIVE INCOME: Net income $ 6,110,000 $ 5,690,000 Other comprehensive income (change in unrealized 2,332,000 2,662,000 gain of marketable equity securities) --------------- ---------------- $ 8,442,000 $ 8,352,000 =============== ================
See accompanying notes 2 PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV, LTD. CONDENSED STATEMENT OF PARTNERS' EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
Other Limited General Comprehensive Total Partners' Partners' Partners' Income Equity ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------- Balance at December 31, 2003 $ 10,740,000 $ 3,725,000 $ 10,605,000 $ 25,070,000 Change in unrealized gain of marketable equity securities - - 2,332,000 2,332,000 Net income 4,689,000 1,421,000 - 6,110,000 Distributions (4,080,000) (1,415,000) - (5,495,000) Equity transfer (152,000) 152,000 - - ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- ----------------- Balance at September 30, 2004 $ 11,197,000 $ 3,883,000 $ 12,937,000 $ 28,017,000 ================ ================ ================ =================
See accompanying notes 3 PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV, LTD. CONDENSED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
Nine Months Ended September 30, ---------------------------------- 2004 2003 ------------- -------------- Cash flows from operating activities: Net income $ 6,110,000 $ 5,690,000 Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: Depreciation 523,000 722,000 Decrease in rent and other receivables 76,000 119,000 (Increase) decrease in other assets (48,000) 43,000 Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities 298,000 258,000 Increase (decrease) in deferred revenue 3,000 (5,000) ------------- -------------- Total adjustments 852,000 1,137,000 ------------- -------------- Net cash provided by operating activities 6,962,000 6,827,000 ------------- -------------- Cash flows from investing activities: Additions to real estate facilities (308,000) (392,000) ------------- -------------- Net cash used in investing activities (308,000) (392,000) ------------- -------------- Cash flows from financing activities: Distributions paid to partners (5,495,000) (5,495,000) ------------- -------------- Net cash used in financing activities (5,495,000) (5,495,000) ------------- -------------- Net increase in cash and cash equivalents 1,159,000 940,000 Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period 1,587,000 698,000 ------------- -------------- Cash and cash equivalents at end of period $ 2,746,000 $ 1,638,000 ============= ============== Supplemental schedule of non-cash activities: Change in fair market value of marketable securities: Marketable securities $ 2,332,000 $ 2,662,000 ============= ============== Other comprehensive income $ 2,332,000 $ 2,662,000 ============= ==============
See accompanying notes 4 PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV, LTD. NOTES TO CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED) 1. Description of the Business Public Storage Properties IV, Ltd., (the "Partnership") is a publicly held limited partnership formed under the California Uniform Limited Partnership Act in December 1977. The Partnership raised $20,000,000 in gross proceeds by selling 40,000 units of limited partnership interest ("Units") in an interstate offering, which commenced in May 1978 and completed in November 1978. The general partners in the Partnership are Public Storage, Inc. ("PSI") and B. Wayne Hughes ("Hughes"). The Partnership was formed to engage in the business of developing and operating self-storage facilities for personal and business use. The Partnership owns 17 self-storage properties in California and Florida. 2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Basis of Presentation: ---------------------- The accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal, recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation have been included. The results of operations for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004 are not necessarily indicative of the results expected for the full year. These unaudited condensed financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes appearing in the Partnership's Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003. Certain amounts previously reported have been reclassified to conform to the September 30, 2004 presentation; including amounts pursuant to the Performance Agreement (see Note 4). Use of Estimates: ----------------- The preparation of the condensed financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the condensed financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Allocation of Net Income: ------------------------- The general partners' share of net income consists of amounts attributable to their 1% capital contribution and an additional percentage of cash flow (as defined) which relates to the general partners' share of cash distributions as set forth in the Partnership Agreement (See "Ownership Interests by the General Partners" under Note 4). All remaining net income is allocated to the limited partners. Per unit data is based on the weighted average number of the limited partnership units (40,000) outstanding during the period. Cash and Cash Equivalents: -------------------------- For financial statement purposes, the Partnership considers all highly liquid investments purchased with a maturity of nine months or less to be cash equivalents. 5 Marketable Securities: ---------------------- Marketable securities at September 30, 2004 consist of 381,980 shares of common stock and 12,412 shares of Equity Stock, Series A of Public Storage, Inc., a publicly traded real estate investment trust and a general partner of the Partnership. We have designated our portfolio of marketable securities as available for sale. Accordingly, at September 30, 2004, we have recorded the marketable securities at fair value, based upon the closing quoted prices of the securities at September 30, 2004. Changes in market value of marketable securities are reflected as unrealized gains or losses directly in Partners' Equity and accordingly have no effect on net income. Comprehensive Income: --------------------- As of January 1, 1998, the Partnership adopted Statement 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income. Statement 130 establishes new rules for the reporting and display of comprehensive income and its components; however, the adoption of this Statement had no impact on the Partnership's net income or shareholders' equity. Statement 130 requires unrealized gains or losses on the Partnership's available-for-sale securities, which prior to adoption were reported separately in shareholders' equity, to be included in other comprehensive income. The primary impact of this statement for the Partnership is to recharacterize unrealized gains or losses in shareholders' equity as "other comprehensive income." Income Taxes: ------------- Public Storage Properties IV, Ltd. is treated as a partnership for Federal income tax purposes with the taxable income of the entity allocated to each partner in accordance with the partnership agreement. Real Estate Facilities and Evaluation of Asset Impairment: ---------------------------------------------------------- Real estate facilities are recorded at cost. Costs associated with the development, construction, renovation and improvement of properties are capitalized. Interest, property taxes, and other costs associated with the development incurred during the construction period are capitalized as building cost. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are charged to expense as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the buildings and improvements, which are generally between 5 and 25 years. Certain real estate facilities have been in service longer than 25 years and accordingly such buildings are fully depreciated at September 30, 2004. We evaluate our real estate for impairment on a quarterly basis. We first evaluate these assets for indicators of impairment such as a) a significant decrease in the market price of real estate, b) a significant adverse change in the extent or manner in which real estate is being used or in its physical condition, c) a significant adverse change in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of the real estate, d) an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally projected for the acquisition of or construction of the real estate, or e) a current-period operating or cash flow loss combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses or a projection or forecast that demonstrates continuing losses associated with the use of the real estate. When any such indicators of impairment are noted, we compare the carrying value of the real estate to the future estimated undiscounted cash flows attributable to the real estate. If the real estate's recoverable amount is less than the carrying value of the asset, then an impairment charge is booked for the excess of carrying value over the real estate's fair value. Our evaluations have identified no such impairments at September 30, 2004. 6 Any real estate which we expect to sell or dispose of prior to their previously estimated useful life are stated at the lower of their estimated net realizable value (less cost to sell) or their carrying value. Revenue and Expense Recognition: -------------------------------- Rental income, which is generally earned pursuant to month-to-month leases for storage space, is recognized as earned. Promotional discounts are recognized as a reduction to rental income over the promotional period, which is generally during the first month of occupancy. Late charges and administrative fees are recognized as rental income when collected. Property taxes are accrued based upon estimates and historical trends. If these estimates are incorrect, the timing of expense recognition could be affected. Cost of operations, general and administrative expense as well as television, yellow page and other advertising expenditures are expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the amounts incurred in an interim period may not be indicative of amounts to be incurred during a full year. Total advertising expenses were $88,000 and $310,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2004, respectively, compared to $106,000 and $321,000, respectively, for the same periods in 2003. Environmental Costs: -------------------- The Partnership's policy is to accrue environmental assessments and/or remediation costs when it is probable that such efforts will be required and the related costs can be reasonably estimated. Although there can be no assurance, we are not aware of any environmental contamination at any of our facilities, which, individually or in the aggregate, would be material to our overall business, financial condition or results of operations. 3. Cash Distributions The Partnership Agreement requires that cash available for distribution (cash flow from all sources less cash necessary for any obligations or capital improvement needs) be distributed at least quarterly. We paid distributions to the limited and general partners totaling $4,080,000 ($102.00 per unit) and $1,415,000, respectively, for the nine month ended September 30, 2004. Future distribution rates may be adjusted to levels, which are supported by operating cash flow after capital improvements and any other necessary obligations. 4. Related Party Transactions Management Agreements and Shared Expenses with Public Storage, Inc.: -------------------------------------------------------------------- The Partnership has a management agreement with PSI pursuant to which PSI operates the Partnership's self-storage facilities for a fee equal to 6% of the facilities' gross revenue (as defined). For the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership paid $157,000 and $172,000, respectively, pursuant to this management agreement. For the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, the Partnership paid $463,000 and $444,000, respectively. The management agreement between the Partnership and PSI may be terminated without cause upon 60 days written notice by the Partnership or nine months notice by PSI. 7 A real estate facility owned by the Partnership (the "Azusa Property") is operated pursuant to a management and performance agreement (the "Performance Agreement") with Public Storage Pickup and Delivery, LP ("PSPUD"), a subsidiary of PSI. Following the commencement of the Performance Agreement, the facility was modified to include self-storage and industrial space, with the cost of these improvements entirely funded by PSPUD. The industrial space was constructed for use in PSPUD's containerized storage operations. Under the Performance Agreement, the Partnership is guaranteed to receive the same net operating income it received with respect to the Azusa Property prior to the effective date of the agreement, with an annual increase of the greater of a) 1% or b) the percentage increase in net operating income achieved at the self-storage facilities managed by PSI in the market in which this facility is located (the "Guaranteed Amounts"). Where the net operating income earned by the Azusa Property is less than these Guaranteed Amounts, PSPUD supplements the Partnership's income. Where the amount earned by the Azusa Property exceeds the Guaranteed Amounts, the excess is remitted to PSPUD. The costs of all capital improvements with respect to the Azusa Property are funded by PSPUD. Included in the line item "Revenues under performance agreement" on the Partnership's Statements of Income, is the pre-depreciation net operating income with respect to the Azusa Property. The Performance Agreement expires on December 31, 2015. The Partnership's facilities, along with facilities owned by PSI and its affiliates, are managed jointly by PSI in order to take advantage of scale and other efficiencies. Joint costs are allocated on a methodology meant to fairly allocate such costs. Such joint costs include supervisory, relief, and administrative personnel costs, television advertising expenses, yellow page advertising, data processing and insurance. The total of such expenses, which are primarily included in cost of operations, amounted to $266,000 and $271,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively, and $862,000 and $802,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Ownership in Public Storage Stock: ---------------------------------- Marketable securities at September 30, 2004 consist of 381,980 shares of common stock and 12,412 shares of Equity Stock, Series A of Public Storage, Inc., a publicly traded real estate investment trust and a general partner of the Partnership. Ownership Interest by the General Partners: ------------------------------------------- PSI and Hughes are general partners of the Partnership. In 1995, Hughes contributed his ownership and rights to distributions from the Partnership to BWH Marina Corporation II, a corporation wholly-owned by Hughes. As such, Hughes continues to act as a general partner of the Partnership but does not directly receive any compensation, distributions or other consideration from the Partnership. The general partners have a 1% interest in the Partnership. In addition, the general partners had an 8% interest in cash distributions attributable to operations (exclusive of distributions attributable to sale and financing proceeds) until the limited partners recovered all of their investment. Thereafter, the general partners have a 25% interest in all cash distributions (including sale and financing proceeds). During 1987, the limited partners recovered all of their initial investment. All subsequent distributions are being made 25.75% (including the 1% interest) to the general partners and 74.25% to the limited partners. Transfers of equity are made periodically to reconcile the partners' equity accounts to the provisions of the Partnership Agreement. These transfers have no effect on results of operations or distributions to partners. As of September 30, 2004, Hughes and members of his family own 15.5% of the Limited Partnership units. PSI and its affiliates own 46.7% of the Limited Partnership units. 8 Ownership in STOR-Re: --------------------- The Partnership has a 1.6% ownership interest in STOR-Re Mutual Insurance Corporation ("STOR-Re"), which was formed in 1994 as an association captive insurance company, and is controlled by PSI. The Partnership accounts for its investment in STOR-Re, which is included in other assets, using the cost method, and has not received any distributions during 2003 or for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. STOR-Re provided limited property and liability insurance coverage to the Partnership, PSI, and affiliates for losses occurring during policy periods prior to April 1, 2004. An entity wholly owned by PSI has succeeded STOR-Re with respect to policy periods subsequent to March 31, 2004. STOR-Re's liabilities for losses and loss adjustment expenses include an amount determined from loss reports and individual cases and an amount, based on recommendations from an outside actuary using a frequency and severity method, for losses incurred but not reported. Determining the liability for unpaid losses and loss adjustment expense is based upon estimates and while we believe that the amount is adequate, the ultimate loss may be in excess of or less than the amounts provided. The methods for making such estimates and for establishing the resulting liability are continually reviewed. 5. Commitments and Contingencies Legal Proceedings: ------------------ Serrao v. Public Storage, Inc. (filed April 2003) (Superior Court - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Orange County) -------------- The plaintiff in this case filed a suit against PSI on behalf of a putative class of renters who rented self-storage units from the PSI. Plaintiff alleges that PSI misrepresented the size of its storage units, has brought claims under California statutory and common law relating to consumer protection, fraud, unfair competition, and negligent misrepresentation, and is seeking monetary damages, restitution, and declaratory and injunctive relief. The claim in this case is substantially similar to those in Henriquez v. Public Storage, Inc., which was disclosed in prior reports. In January 2003, the plaintiff caused the Henriquez action to be dismissed. Based upon the uncertainty inherent in any putative class action, PSI cannot presently determine the potential damages, if any, or the ultimate outcome of this litigation. On November 3, 2003, the court granted the PSI's motion to strike the plaintiff's nationwide class allegations and to limit any putative class to California residents only. PSI is vigorously contesting the claims upon which this lawsuit is based including class certification efforts. Salaam et al v. Public Storage, Inc. (filed February 2000) (Superior ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Court - Sacramento County); Holzman et al v. Public Storage, Inc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (filed October 2004) (Superior Court - Sacramento County) --------------------------------------------------------- The plaintiffs in the Salaam case are suing PSI on behalf of a putative class of California resident property managers who claim that they were not compensated for all the hours they worked. The named plaintiffs have indicated that their claims total less than $20,000 in aggregate. On December 1, 2003, the California Court of Appeals affirmed the Supreme Court's 2002 denial of plaintiff's motion for class certification. The affirmation of the denial of class certification does not address the claim under the California Unfair Business Practices Act. 9 The plaintiffs in the Holzman case, who are represented by the same attorneys as the Salaam plaintiffs, are seeking substantially the same claims with additional minor variations in an acknowledged second effort to proceed as a class, in reliance on a recent California Supreme Court case. The plaintiffs have not yet identified an aggregate value of their claims which, on an individual basis, are alleged wage losses of $4,000 or less. The plaintiffs also assert claims under the California Unfair Business Practices Act. The maximum potential liability for both of these cases cannot be estimated, but can only be increased if claims are permitted to be brought on behalf of others under the California Unfair Business Practices Act or, in the Holzman case, if plaintiff prevails on a motion for class certification. PSI is continuing to vigorously contest the claims in these cases and intends to resist any expansion beyond the named plaintiffs, including by opposing claims on behalf of others under the California Unfair Business Practices Act or, in the case of the Holzman case, for class certification. PSI cannot presently determine the potential damages, if any, or the ultimate outcome of this litigation. Other Items ----------- PSI and The Partnership are parties to various claims, complaints, and other legal actions that have arisen in the normal course of business from time to time that are not described above. We believe that it is unlikely that the outcome of these other pending legal proceedings including employment and tenant claims, in the aggregate, will have a material adverse impact upon the operations or financial position of the Partnership. 10 Item 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND --------------------------------------------------------------- RESULTS OF OPERATIONS --------------------- The following should be read in conjunction with the Partnership's condensed financial statements and notes thereto. FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS: When used within this document, the words "expects," "believes," "anticipates," "may," "should," "estimates," and similar expressions are intended to identify "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of that term in Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933, as amended, and in Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Such forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties, and other factors, which may cause the actual results and performance of the Partnership to be materially different from those expressed or implied in the forward looking statements. Such factors are described in "Risk Factors" (as discussed below) and include changes in general economic conditions and in the markets in which the Partnership operates and the impact of competition from new and existing storage and commercial facilities and other storage alternatives, which could impact rents and occupancy levels at the Partnership's facilities; the impact of the regulatory environment as well as national, state, and local laws and regulations, which could increase the Partnership's expense and reduce the Partnership's cash available for distribution; and economic uncertainty due to the impact of war or terrorism could adversely affect our business plan. We disclaim any obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions to these forward-looking statements reflecting new estimates, events or circumstances after the date of this report. CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES - ---------------------------- IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS: Substantially all of our assets consist of real estate. We quarterly evaluate our real estate for impairment. The evaluation of real estate for impairment requires determining whether indicators of impairment exist, which is a subjective process. When any indicators of impairment are found, the evaluation then entails projections of future operating cash flows, which also involves significant judgment. We have identified no such impairments at September 30, 2004. However, future events, or facts and circumstances that currently exist that we have not yet identified, could cause us to conclude in the future that our real estate is impaired. Any resulting impairment loss could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition and results of operations. ESTIMATED USEFUL LIVES OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS: Substantially all of our assets consist of depreciable, long-lived assets. We record depreciation expense with respect to these assets based upon their estimated useful lives. Any change in the estimated useful lives of those assets, caused by functional or economic obsolescence or other factors, could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations. ACCRUALS FOR CONTINGENCIES: We are exposed to business and legal liability risks with respect to events that have occurred, but in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we have not accrued for such potential liabilities because the loss is either not probable or not estimable or because we are not aware of the event. Future events and the result of pending litigation could result in such potential losses becoming probable and estimable, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition or results of operations. Some of these potential losses which we are aware of, are described in Note 5 to the partnership's financial statements. ACCRUALS FOR OPERATING EXPENSES: We accrue for property tax expense and other operating expenses based upon estimates and historical trends and current and anticipated local and state government rules and regulations. If these estimates and assumptions are incorrect, our expenses could be misstated. Cost of operations, general and administrative expense, as well as television, yellow page, and other advertising expenditures are expensed as incurred. Accordingly, the amounts incurred in an interim period may not be indicative of the amounts to be incurred in a full year. 11 RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- EFFECTS OF HURRICANES: During the third quarter of 2004, we believe that none of our facilities located in Florida incurred significant structural damages due to Hurricanes Charley, Frances, Ivan and Jeanne. However, we estimate that approximately $11,000 will be incurred during the fourth quarter of 2004, to clean-up debris from Hurricane Frances at our two Fort Lauderdale facilities. A portion of these costs will be reimbursed by our insurance carriers. THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003: Our net income for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was $2,164,000 compared to $1,995,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003, representing an increase of $169,000 or 9%. Rental income for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was $2,616,000 compared to $2,542,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003, representing an increase of $74,000 or 3%. These increases are attributable to an increase in annualized realized rents per square foot at the Partnership's self-storage facilities. Weighted average occupancy levels at the self-storage facilities were 92% for the three months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. Annual realized rent for the three months ended September 30, 2004 increased to $14.00 per occupied square foot from $13.58 per occupied square foot for the three months ended September 30, 2003. Cost of operations (including management fees paid to affiliate - see Note 4 to the Financial Statements) for the three months ended September 30, 2004 was $790,000 compared to $764,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2003, representing an increase of $26,000 or 3%. The increase in cost of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2004, is primarily due to increases in repair and maintenance, utilities and property tax. Depreciation expense was $141,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $241,000 for the same period in 2003, a decrease of $100,000 or 41%. The decrease in depreciation expense is primarily related to the initial development costs of buildings for many self-storage facilities becoming fully depreciated. NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2004 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2003: Our net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $6,110,000 compared to $5,690,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, representing an increase of $420,000 or 7%. Rental income for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $7,721,000 compared to $7,399,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, representing an increase of $322,000 or 4%. These increases are attributable to an increase in annualized realized rents per square foot and an increase in average occupancy at the Partnership's self-storage facilities. Weighted average occupancy levels at the self-storage facilities were 91% and 90% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003, respectively. Annual realized rent for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 increased to $13.80 per occupied square foot from $13.37 per occupied square foot for the nine months ended September 30, 2003. Cost of operations (including management fees paid to affiliate - see Note 4 to the Financial Statements) for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 was $2,425,000 compared to $2,258,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2003, representing an increase of $167,000 or 7%. The increase in cost of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2004, is primarily due to increases in utilities, repairs and maintenance, management fees and property tax. Depreciation expense was $523,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004 compared to $722,000 for the same period in 2003, a decrease of $199,000 or 28%. The decrease in depreciation expense is primarily related to the initial development costs of buildings for many self-storage facilities becoming fully depreciated. LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES - ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Cash flows from operating activities ($6,962,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2004) have been sufficient to meet all current obligations of the Partnership. 12 At September 30, 2004, we held 381,980 shares of common stock and 12,412 shares of Equity Stock, Series A of Public Storage, Inc. with a fair value totaling $19,277,000 (cost basis of $6,340,000). We recognized $538,000 in dividends for each of the nine months ended September 30, 2004 and 2003. The Partnership Agreement requires that cash available for distribution (cash flow from all sources less cash necessary for any obligations or capital improvement needs) be distributed at least quarterly. We paid distributions to the limited and general partners totaling $4,080,000 ($102.00 per unit) and $1,415,000, respectively, for the nine months ended September 30, 2004. Future distribution rates may be adjusted to levels, which are supported by operating cash flow after capital improvements and any other necessary obligations. The Partnership may borrow in the future with the intent of using the proceeds to finance distributions to the limited and general partners. ITEM 2A. RISK FACTORS ------------ In addition to the other information in our Form 10-Q and Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2003, you should consider the following factors in evaluating the Partnership: PUBLIC STORAGE HAS A SIGNIFICANT DEGREE OF CONTROL OVER THE PARTNERSHIP. Public Storage is general partner and owns approximately 28.4% of our outstanding limited partnership units. In addition, PS Orangeco Partnerships, Inc., an affiliate of Public Storage, owns an additional 18.3% of our outstanding limited partnership units. As a result, Public Storage has a significant degree of control over matters submitted to a vote of our unitholders, including amending our organizational documents, dissolving the Partnership and approving other extraordinary transactions. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 404 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT Pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, we will be required to include, in our annual report beginning December 31, 2005, our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting and our audited financial statements as of that date. Furthermore, our independent registered public accounting firm will be required to attest to whether our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting is fairly statement in all material respects and separately report on whether it believes we maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2005. As of September 30, 2004, PSI, our General Partner, has not completed our assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. PSI believes we will meet the requirements of Section 404, however, if PSI fails to timely complete their assessment, or if our independent registered public accounting firm cannot timely attest to their assessment, we could be subject to regulatory sanctions and a loss of public confidence in our internal control. In addition, any failure to implement new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could have an adverse effect on our operating results or cause us to fail to timely meet our regulatory reporting obligations. INCREASES IN INTEREST RATES MAY ADVERSELY AFFECT THE VALUE OF PARTNERSHIP UNITS. One of the factors that influence the value of our partnership units is the annual rate of distributions that we pay as compared with interest rates. An increase in interest rates may lead purchasers of real estate partnership units to demand higher annual distribution rates, which could adversely affect the market price of our partnership units. 13 DEVELOPMENTS IN CALIFORNIA MAY HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS. A majority of our properties are located in California. California is facing serious budgetary problems. Action that may be taken in response to these problems, such as an increase in property taxes on commercial properties, could adversely impact our business and results of operations. In addition, we could be adversely impacted by the recently enacted legislation and recent ballot initiatives mandating medical insurance for employees of California businesses and members of their families beginning in 2006. DEPENDENCY UPON AUTOMATED PROCESSES AND THE INTERNET. We have become increasingly centralized and dependent upon automated information technology processes. As a result, we could be severely impacted by a catastrophic occurrence, such as a natural disaster or a terrorist attack. In addition, a portion of our business operations are conducted over the internet, increasing the risk of viruses that could cause system failures and disruptions of operations. SINCE OUR BUSINESS CONSISTS PRIMARILY OF ACQUIRING AND OPERATING REAL ESTATE, WE ARE SUBJECT TO REAL ESTATE OPERATING RISKS. The value of our investments may be reduced by general risks of real estate ownership. Since we derive substantially all of our income from real estate operations, we are subject to the general risks of owning real estate-related assets, including: o lack of demand for rental spaces or units in a locale; o changes in general economic or local conditions; o changes in supply of or demand for similar or competing facilities in an area; o natural disasters, such as earthquakes; o potential terrorists attacks; o the impact of environmental protection laws; o changes in interest rates and availability of permanent mortgage funds which may render the sale or financing of a property difficult or unattractive; and o changes in tax, real estate and zoning laws. There is significant competition among self-storage facilities and from other storage alternatives. Most of our properties are self-storage facilities. Local market conditions will play a significant part in how competition will affect us. Competition in the market areas in which many of our properties are located from other self-storage facilities and other storage alternatives is significant and has affected the occupancy levels, rental rates and operating expenses of some of our properties. Any increase in availability of funds for investment in real estate may accelerate competition. Further development of self-storage facilities may intensify competition among operators of self-storage facilities in the market areas in which we operate. We may incur significant environmental costs and liabilities. As an owner of real properties, under various federal, state and local environmental laws, we are required to clean up spills or other releases of hazardous or toxic substances on or from our properties. Certain environmental laws impose liability whether or not the owner knew of, or was responsible for, the presence of the hazardous or toxic substances. In some cases, liability may not be limited to the value of the property. The presence of these substances, or the failure to properly remediate any resulting contamination, also may adversely affect the owner's or operator's ability to sell, lease or operate its property or to borrow using its property as collateral. We have conducted preliminary environmental assessments on the properties the Partnership has an interest in to evaluate the environmental condition of, and potential environmental liabilities associated with, our properties. These assessments generally consist of an investigation of environmental conditions at the property (not including soil or groundwater sampling or analysis), as well as a review of available information regarding the site and publicly available data regarding conditions at other sites in the vicinity. In connection with these property assessments, we have become aware that prior operations or activities at some facilities or from nearby locations have or may have resulted in contamination to the soil or groundwater at these facilities. In this regard, some of our facilities are or may be the subject of federal or state environment investigations or remedial actions. Although we cannot provide any assurance, based on the preliminary environmental assessments, we believe we have funds available to cover any liability from environmental contamination or potential contamination and we are not aware of any environmental contamination of our facilities material to our overall business, financial condition or results of operation. 14 There has been an increasing number of claims and litigation against owners and managers of rental properties relating to moisture infiltration, which can result in mold or other property damage. When we receive a complaint concerning moisture infiltration, condensation or mold problems and/or become aware that an air quality concern exists, we implement corrective measures in accordance with guidelines and protocols we have developed with the assistance of outside experts. We seek to work with our tenants to resolve moisture infiltration and mold-related issues, subject to our contractual limitations on liability for such claims. However, we can make no assurance that material legal claims relating to moisture infiltration and the presence of, or exposure to, mold will not arise in the future. Property taxes can increase and cause a decline in yields on investments. Each of our properties is subject to real property taxes. These real property taxes may increase in the future as property tax rates change and as our properties are assessed or reassessed by tax authorities. Such increases could adversely impact the Partnership's profitability. We must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and fire and safety regulations, which can require significant expenditures. All our properties must comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act and with related regulations (the "ADA"). The ADA has separate compliance requirements for "public accommodations" and "commercial facilities," but generally requires that buildings be made accessible to persons with disabilities. Various state laws impose similar requirements. A failure to comply with the ADA or similar state laws could result in government imposed fines on us and the award of damages to individuals affected by the failure. In addition, we must operate our properties in compliance with numerous local fire and safety regulations, building codes, and other land use regulations. Compliance with these requirements can require us to spend substantial amounts of money, which would reduce cash otherwise available for distribution to partners. Failure to comply with these requirements could also affect the marketability of our real estate facilities. TERRORIST ATTACKS AND THE POSSIBILITY OF WIDER ARMED CONFLICT MAY HAVE AN ADVERSE IMPACT ON OUR BUSINESS AND OPERATING RESULTS AND COULD DECREASE THE VALUE OF OUR ASSETS. Terrorist attacks and other acts of violence or war, such as those that took place on September 11, 2001, could have a material adverse impact on our business and operating results. There can be no assurance that there will not be further terrorist attacks against the United States or its businesses or interests. Attacks or armed conflicts that directly impact one or more of our properties could significantly affect our ability to operate those properties and thereby impair our operating results. Further, we may not have insurance coverage for losses caused by a terrorist attack. Such insurance may not be available, or if it is available and we decide to obtain such terrorist coverage, the cost for the insurance may be significant in relationship to the risk overall. In addition, the adverse effects that such violent acts and threats of future attacks could have on the U.S. economy could similarly have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations. Finally, further terrorist acts could cause the United States to enter into a wider armed conflict, which could further impact our business and operating results. ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES ----------------------- Public Storage, Inc. maintains disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports the Partnership files and submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in accordance with SEC guidelines and that such information is communicated to the Partnership's management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure based on the definition of "disclosure controls and procedures" in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures in reaching that level of reasonable assurance. 15 At the end of the period covered by this report, Public Storage, Inc. carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Partnership's management, including Public Storage, Inc.'s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures. Based upon that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Partnership's disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 16 PART II. OTHER INFORMATION ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS ----------------- Serrao v. Public Storage, Inc. (filed April 2003) (Superior Court - ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Orange County) -------------- The plaintiff in this case filed a suit against PSI on behalf of a putative class of renters who rented self-storage units from the PSI. Plaintiff alleges that PSI misrepresented the size of its storage units, has brought claims under California statutory and common law relating to consumer protection, fraud, unfair competition, and negligent misrepresentation, and is seeking monetary damages, restitution, and declaratory and injunctive relief. The claim in this case is substantially similar to those in Henriquez v. Public Storage, Inc., which was disclosed in prior reports. In January 2003, the plaintiff caused the Henriquez action to be dismissed. Based upon the uncertainty inherent in any putative class action, PSI cannot presently determine the potential damages, if any, or the ultimate outcome of this litigation. On November 3, 2003, the court granted the PSI's motion to strike the plaintiff's nationwide class allegations and to limit any putative class to California residents only. PSI is vigorously contesting the claims upon which this lawsuit is based including class certification efforts. Salaam et al v. Public Storage, Inc. (filed February 2000) (Superior ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Court - Sacramento County); Holzman et al v. Public Storage, Inc. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (filed October 2004) (Superior Court - Sacramento County) --------------------------------------------------------- The plaintiffs in the Salaam case are suing PSI on behalf of a putative class of California resident property managers who claim that they were not compensated for all the hours they worked. The named plaintiffs have indicated that their claims total less than $20,000 in aggregate. On December 1, 2003, the California Court of Appeals affirmed the Supreme Court's 2002 denial of plaintiff's motion for class certification. The affirmation of the denial of class certification does not address the claim under the California Unfair Business Practices Act. The plaintiffs in the Holzman case, who are represented by the same attorneys as the Salaam plaintiffs, are seeking substantially the same claims with additional minor variations in an acknowledged second effort to proceed as a class, in reliance on a recent California Supreme Court case. The plaintiffs have not yet identified an aggregate value of their claims which, on an individual basis, are alleged wage losses of $4,000 or less. The plaintiffs also assert claims under the California Unfair Business Practices Act. The maximum potential liability for both of these cases cannot be estimated, but can only be increased if claims are permitted to be brought on behalf of others under the California Unfair Business Practices Act or, in the Holzman case, if plaintiff prevails on a motion for class certification. PSI is continuing to vigorously contest the claims in these cases and intends to resist any expansion beyond the named plaintiffs, including by opposing claims on behalf of others under the California Unfair Business Practices Act or, in the case of the Holzman case, for class certification. PSI cannot presently determine the potential damages, if any, or the ultimate outcome of this litigation. 17 ITEM 6. EXHIBITS AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K. (a) The following Exhibits are included herein: 31.1 Certification by Ronald L. Havner, Jr. pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 31.2 Certification by John Reyes pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 32 Certification of CEO and CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (b) Form 8-K None 18 SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized. DATED: November 15, 2004 PUBLIC STORAGE PROPERTIES IV, LTD. BY: Public Storage, Inc. General Partner BY: /s/ John Reyes John Reyes Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 19 EX-31 2 psp43q04_ex311.txt CERTIFICATION - CEO Exhibit 31.1 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, Ronald L. Havner, Jr., certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Public Storage Properties IV, Ltd.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or person performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. /s/ Ronald L. Havner, Jr. - ------------------------- Name: Ronald L. Havner, Jr. Title: Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage, Inc., Corporate General Partner Date: November 15, 2004 EX-31 3 psp43q04_ex312.txt CERTIFICATION: CFO Exhibit 31.2 CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 I, John Reyes certify that: 1. I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of Public Storage Properties IV, Ltd.; 2. Based on my knowledge, this quarterly report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report; 3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report; 4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in the Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and we have: a) designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report is being prepared; b) designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles; c) evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures and presented in this report conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; d) disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant's fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and 5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or person performing the equivalent functions): a) all significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and b) any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting. /s/ John Reyes - ----------------- Name: John Reyes Title: Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage, Inc., Corporate General Partner Date: November 15, 2004 EX-32 4 psp43q04_ex32.txt CERTIFICATION: CEO AND CFO Exhibit 32 CERTIFICATION OF CEO AND CFO PURSUANT TO 18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350, AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 In connection with the Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q of Public Storage Properties IV, Ltd. (the "Partnership") for the quarterly period ended September 30, 2004 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the "Report"), Ronald L. Havner, Jr., as Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage, Inc., and John Reyes, as Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage, Inc., each hereby certifies, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.ss.1350, as adopted pursuant toss.906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that: (1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and (2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and results of operations of the Partnership. /s/ Ronald L. Havner, Jr. - ------------------------------------ Name: Ronald L. Havner, Jr. Title: Chief Executive Officer of Public Storage, Inc., Corporate General Partner Date: November 15, 2004 /s/ John Reyes - ------------------------------------ Name: John Reyes Title: Chief Financial Officer of Public Storage, Inc., Corporate General Partner Date: November 15, 2004 -----END PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----