N-CSR 1 filing800.htm PRIMARY DOCUMENT

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM N-CSR

CERTIFIED SHAREHOLDER REPORT OF REGISTERED

MANAGEMENT INVESTMENT COMPANIES


Investment Company Act file number   811-2741


Fidelity Court Street Trust

 (Exact name of registrant as specified in charter)


245 Summer St., Boston, Massachusetts  02210

 (Address of principal executive offices)       (Zip code)


Marc Bryant, Secretary

245 Summer St.

Boston, Massachusetts  02210

(Name and address of agent for service)



Registrant's telephone number, including area code:

617-563-7000



Date of fiscal year end:

November 30

 

 

Date of reporting period:

November 30, 2016


Item 1.

Reports to Stockholders





Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund



Annual Report

November 30, 2016




Fidelity Investments


Contents

Performance

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

Investment Summary

Investments

Financial Statements

Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund

Investment Summary/Performance

Investments

Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Trustees and Officers

Shareholder Expense Example

Distributions

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Contracts and Management Fees

Proxy Voting Results


To view a fund's proxy voting guidelines and proxy voting record for the 12-month period ended June 30, visit http://www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) web site at http://www.sec.gov.

You may also call 1-800-544-8544 to request a free copy of the proxy voting guidelines.

Standard & Poor's, S&P and S&P 500 are registered service marks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and have been licensed for use by Fidelity Distributors Corporation.

Other third-party marks appearing herein are the property of their respective owners.

All other marks appearing herein are registered or unregistered trademarks or service marks of FMR LLC or an affiliated company. © 2017 FMR LLC. All rights reserved.



This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. This report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.

A fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov. A fund's Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information regarding the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

For a complete list of a fund's portfolio holdings, view the most recent holdings listing, semiannual report, or annual report on Fidelity's web site at http://www.fidelity.com, http://www.institutional.fidelity.com, or http://www.401k.com, as applicable.

NOT FDIC INSURED •MAY LOSE VALUE •NO BANK GUARANTEE

Neither the Fund nor Fidelity Distributors Corporation is a bank.



Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

Performance: The Bottom Line

Average annual total return reflects the change in the value of an investment, assuming reinvestment of distributions from dividend income and capital gains (the profits earned upon the sale of securities that have grown in value, if any) and assuming a constant rate of performance each year. The hypothetical investment and the average annual total returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. During periods of reimbursement by Fidelity, a fund’s total return will be greater than it would be had the reimbursement not occurred. How a fund did yesterday is no guarantee of how it will do tomorrow.

Average Annual Total Returns

For the periods ended November 30, 2016 Past 1 year Past 5 years Past 10 years 
Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund 1.08% 3.20% 3.69% 

$10,000 Over 10 Years

Let's say hypothetically that $10,000 was invested in Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund on November 30, 2006.

The chart shows how the value of your investment would have changed, and also shows how the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index performed over the same period.


Period Ending Values

$14,362Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

$14,929Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index

Effective August 24, 2016, all Barclays benchmark indices were co-branded as the Bloomberg Barclays Indices for a period of five years.



Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

Market Recap:  For the 12 months ending November 30, 2016, tax-exempt bond performance was modestly negative. The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index returned -0.22% for the period. The downward trend began in September and steepened in November, the worst month for the muni market since September 2008. The U.S. presidential election negatively impacted market performance, as investors became concerned about President-elect Donald Trump’s expansionary fiscal policy ambitions, inflation and the potential for tax reform to impair tax-exempt bond valuations. Further, some theorized that changes to or repeal of the Affordable Care Act by the incoming administration and a Republican-controlled Congress may affect the prices of muni bonds issued by hospitals. At period end, concerns about unfunded pension liabilities generally are compartmentalized to certain issuers. Looking ahead, we think the U.S. Federal Reserve is likely to raise policy interest rates in December and signal for more rate hikes in 2017.

Comments from Co-Portfolio Manager Kevin Ramundo:  For the year, the fund gained 1.08%, performing roughly in line, net of fees, with the 1.12% return of the Bloomberg Barclays New Jersey Enhanced Modified Municipal Bond Index. Despite substantial interest rate volatility, the portfolio managers continued to focus on long-term objectives by seeking to generate attractive tax-exempt income and competitive risk-adjusted returns over time. Relative performance was helped by the advance refunding of some of our holdings, particularly New Jersey State Education Authority bonds. Such refinancings usually result in price gains for bondholders: The bond’s maturities shorten and their credit quality rises, because they are backed by high-quality U.S. government securities. The fund also benefited from our larger-than-index stake in health care bonds, a sector that outpaced the New Jersey market as a whole for the year. The fund’s performance against the benchmark index was also positively impacted by Bloomberg’s decision to change the pricing source for the benchmark index. The fund’s yield curve positioning was the predominant detractor. The front end of the yield curve (bonds 10 years or shorter) underperformed the most during the reporting period. This was due to the fear of rising rates and the surprising results of the U.S. national election. The fund was bulleted, meaning overweighted the 10-year part of the curve.

The views expressed above reflect those of the portfolio manager(s) only through the end of the period as stated on the cover of this report and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.

Note to Shareholders:  On May 2, 2016, Cormac Cullen, Kevin Ramundo and Mark Sommer became co-managers of the fund, succeeding Lead Portfolio Manager Jamie Pagliocco.

Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

Investment Summary (Unaudited)

Top Five Sectors as of November 30, 2016

 % of fund's net assets % of fund's net assets 6 months ago 
General Obligations 36.5 36.0 
Health Care 19.3 18.9 
Transportation 16.4 15.5 
Education 11.3 10.9 
Escrowed/Pre-Refunded 8.9 8.8 

Quality Diversification (% of fund's net assets)

As of November 30, 2016 
   AA,A 81.1% 
   BBB 14.0% 
   Not Rated 1.7% 
   Short-Term Investments and Net Other Assets 3.2% 


As of May 31, 2016 
   AAA 2.0% 
   AA,A 82.6% 
   BBB 10.9% 
   Not Rated 1.4% 
   Short-Term Investments and Net Other Assets 3.1% 


We have used ratings from Moody's Investors Service, Inc. Where Moody's® ratings are not available, we have used S&P® ratings. All ratings are as of the date indicated and do not reflect subsequent changes.

Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

Investments November 30, 2016

Showing Percentage of Net Assets

Municipal Bonds - 95.5%   
 Principal Amount Value 
Delaware, New Jersey - 0.8%   
Delaware River & Bay Auth. Rev.:   
Series 2014 A, 5% 1/1/44 $3,000,000 $3,279,690 
Series 2014 B, 5% 1/1/23 700,000 799,708 
TOTAL DELAWARE, NEW JERSEY  4,079,398 
Guam - 0.7%   
Guam Gov't. Ltd. Oblig. Rev. Series 2016 A, 5% 12/1/29 900,000 1,014,777 
Guam Int'l. Arpt. Auth. Rev. Series 2013 C, 6.375% 10/1/43 (a) 1,000,000 1,139,510 
Guam Pwr. Auth. Rev. Series 2012 A, 5% 10/1/22 (FSA Insured) 1,500,000 1,700,940 
TOTAL GUAM  3,855,227 
New Jersey - 87.0%   
Bayonne Gen. Oblig.:   
Series 2016:   
5% 7/1/35 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 1,000,000 1,093,000 
5% 7/1/39 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 1,000,000 1,084,650 
5.5% 7/1/39 (Pre-Refunded to 7/1/19 @ 100) 5,000,000 5,493,400 
Camden County Impt. Auth. Health Care Redev. Rev. Series 2014 A:   
5% 2/15/26 1,000,000 1,118,220 
5% 2/15/27 1,000,000 1,110,060 
5% 2/15/28 1,000,000 1,103,990 
5% 2/15/29 1,000,000 1,096,820 
Camden County Impt. Auth. Rev. (County Cap. Prog.) Series 2016, 5% 1/15/32 3,000,000 3,411,060 
Cape May County Indl. Poll. Cont. Fing. Auth. Rev. (Atlantic City Elec. Co. Proj.) Series 1991 A, 6.8% 3/1/21 (Nat'l. Pub. Fin. Guarantee Corp. Insured) 1,350,000 1,538,258 
Cumberland County Impt. Auth. (Technical High School Proj.) Series 2014:   
5% 9/1/21 (FSA Insured) 530,000 597,946 
5% 9/1/23 (FSA Insured) 600,000 695,700 
5% 9/1/24 (FSA Insured) 1,640,000 1,917,996 
5% 9/1/25 (FSA Insured) 1,375,000 1,607,031 
5% 9/1/26 (FSA Insured) 2,480,000 2,873,973 
5% 9/1/39 (FSA Insured) 4,000,000 4,417,760 
East Brunswick Township Board of Ed.:   
5% 11/1/22 1,000,000 1,156,050 
5% 11/1/23 1,000,000 1,159,410 
East Windsor Reg'l. School District:   
5% 3/1/20 1,045,000 1,149,030 
5% 3/1/21 1,000,000 1,119,150 
Essex County Util. Auth. Solid Waste Rev. Series 2009, 5% 4/1/20 (Assured Guaranty Corp. Insured) 1,000,000 1,077,660 
Garden State Preservation Trust Open Space & Farmland Preservation Series 2012 A, 5% 11/1/22 6,600,000 7,301,844 
Monroe Township Board of Ed. Series 2012:   
5% 8/1/26 3,220,000 3,659,369 
5% 8/1/28 4,000,000 4,541,240 
Morristown Gen. Oblig. Series 2005, 6.5% 8/1/19 (FSA Insured) 20,000 22,498 
New Brunswick Parking Auth. Rev. Series 2012:   
5% 9/1/23 1,450,000 1,644,721 
5% 9/1/26 600,000 675,774 
5% 9/1/27 440,000 494,318 
New Jersey Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev.:   
(Goethals Bridge Replacement Proj.) Series 2013:   
5.125% 1/1/34 (a) 1,500,000 1,600,155 
5.375% 1/1/43 (a) 2,000,000 2,132,360 
Series 2005 N1, 5.5% 9/1/24 (AMBAC Insured) 5,000,000 5,473,750 
Series 2011 EE, 5% 9/1/17 (Escrowed to Maturity) 200,000 205,752 
Series 2011 GG, 5% 9/1/17 (Escrowed to Maturity) 250,000 257,190 
Series 2012 II, 5% 3/1/26 5,000,000 5,224,300 
Series 2012, 5% 6/15/20 5,000,000 5,351,400 
Series 2013 NN, 5% 3/1/27 20,000,000 20,790,998 
Series 2013:   
5% 3/1/23 4,800,000 5,065,152 
5% 3/1/25 700,000 729,239 
Series 2015 WW, 5.25% 6/15/40 2,000,000 2,065,180 
Series 2015 XX:   
4.25% 6/15/26 3,000,000 2,944,650 
5.25% 6/15/27 3,000,000 3,234,930 
6% 12/15/34 (Pre-Refunded to 12/15/18 @ 100) 1,905,000 2,084,413 
6% 12/15/34 (Pre-Refunded to 12/15/34 @ 100) 40,000 42,669 
New Jersey Econ. Dev. Auth. Wtr. Facilities Rev. (American Wtr. Co., Inc. Proj.) Series 2009 A, 5.7% 10/1/39 (a) 5,000,000 5,373,700 
New Jersey Edl. Facilities Auth. Rev.:   
(New Jersey Institute of Technology Proj.) Series 2010 H, 5% 7/1/31 2,000,000 2,169,100 
(Princeton Theological Seminary Proj.) Series 2009 B:   
4% 7/1/22 1,000,000 1,058,160 
5% 7/1/17 490,000 501,407 
5% 7/1/18 250,000 264,710 
5% 7/1/19 200,000 218,180 
Series 2012 A:   
5% 7/1/18 1,000,000 1,055,780 
5% 7/1/19 1,040,000 1,119,186 
Series 2012 B:   
5% 7/1/37 750,000 802,178 
5% 7/1/42 1,100,000 1,163,998 
New Jersey Edl. Facility:   
(College of New Jersey Proj.) Series 2016 F 5% 7/1/29 670,000 754,031 
Series 2007:   
5.5% 7/1/18 265,000 271,864 
5.5% 7/1/18 4,125,000 4,385,040 
Series 2008:   
5% 7/1/19 (Assured Guaranty Corp. Insured) 195,000 204,970 
5% 7/1/19 (Pre-Refunded to 7/1/18 @ 100) 2,375,000 2,512,061 
Series 2015 B:   
3.625% 7/1/30 (FSA Insured) 510,000 496,893 
5% 7/1/29 2,770,000 3,097,109 
5% 7/1/31 3,000,000 3,312,000 
Series 2016 A:   
5% 7/1/27 2,875,000 3,125,528 
5% 7/1/32 1,000,000 1,056,030 
5% 7/1/33 3,000,000 3,156,060 
5% 7/1/41 2,425,000 2,510,748 
Series 2016 E:   
5% 7/1/32 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 3,335,000 3,744,605 
5% 7/1/33 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 1,000,000 1,118,500 
5% 7/1/34 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 1,000,000 1,114,200 
5% 7/1/35 (Pre-Refunded to 7/1/18 @ 100) 965,000 1,020,690 
5% 7/1/35 (Pre-Refunded to 7/1/18 @ 100) 3,035,000 3,210,150 
New Jersey Gen. Oblig. 5% 6/1/25 3,340,000 3,791,768 
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Fing. Auth. Rev.:   
(AtlantiCare Reg'l. Med. Ctr. Proj.) Series 2007, 5% 7/1/17 (Escrowed to Maturity) 1,000,000 1,022,760 
(Chilton Memorial Hosp. Proj.) Series 2009, 5.75% 7/1/39 (Pre-Refunded to 7/1/19 @ 100) 3,765,000 4,155,129 
(Greystone Park Psychiatric Hosp. Proj.) Series 2013 B, 5% 9/15/24 8,000,000 8,558,560 
(Hackensack Univ. Med. Ctr. Proj.):   
Series 2010 B, 5% 1/1/22 1,725,000 1,859,171 
Series 2010, 5% 1/1/34 2,000,000 2,112,300 
(Robert Wood Johnson Univ. Hosp. Proj.) Series 2010, 5% 7/1/31 (Pre-Refunded to 1/1/20 @ 100) 5,000,000 5,498,100 
(Virtua Health Proj.) Series A, 5.25% 7/1/17 (Assured Guaranty Corp. Insured) 6,000,000 6,146,820 
Series 2008:   
5.25% 10/1/38 4,635,000 4,791,663 
5.25% 10/1/38 (Pre-Refunded to 10/1/18 @ 100) 1,330,000 1,423,778 
6.625% 7/1/38 (Pre-Refunded to 7/1/18 @ 100) 10,745,000 11,635,975 
Series 2009 A, 5.75% 10/1/31 4,000,000 4,275,200 
Series 2011:   
5% 7/1/19 1,500,000 1,622,865 
5% 7/1/23 2,500,000 2,839,875 
5% 7/1/24 2,000,000 2,259,640 
5% 7/1/25 2,265,000 2,541,511 
Series 2012 A:   
5% 7/1/18 795,000 839,981 
5% 7/1/22 1,400,000 1,593,466 
5% 7/1/23 1,000,000 1,129,270 
5% 7/1/24 2,000,000 2,236,460 
5% 7/1/25 1,000,000 1,109,490 
Series 2012 II, 5% 7/1/42 1,000,000 1,047,440 
Series 2012, 5% 7/1/21 2,325,000 2,585,237 
Series 2013 A:   
5% 7/1/28 1,080,000 1,193,702 
5% 7/1/32 1,600,000 1,732,944 
5.25% 7/1/28 3,250,000 3,629,763 
Series 2013:   
5% 7/1/24 1,250,000 1,424,450 
5% 7/1/26 1,335,000 1,493,157 
5.25% 7/1/31 4,000,000 4,307,880 
5.5% 7/1/43 3,000,000 3,294,060 
Series 2014 A:   
4% 7/1/45 1,300,000 1,215,864 
5% 7/1/30 700,000 768,320 
5% 7/1/31 455,000 496,878 
5% 7/1/32 1,000,000 1,090,660 
5% 7/1/44 3,525,000 3,805,802 
5% 7/1/45 2,225,000 2,387,692 
Series 2016 A:   
5% 7/1/26 (b) 1,565,000 1,715,271 
5% 7/1/27 (b) 1,685,000 1,838,537 
5% 7/1/28 1,000,000 1,150,940 
5% 7/1/28 (b) 1,000,000 1,083,820 
5% 7/1/29 3,660,000 4,173,498 
5% 7/1/29 (b) 1,000,000 1,076,580 
5% 7/1/30 1,200,000 1,357,824 
5% 7/1/30 (b) 1,000,000 1,071,790 
5% 7/1/31 5,100,000 5,708,736 
5% 7/1/31 10,000,000 10,955,100 
5% 7/1/33 1,000,000 1,109,920 
5% 7/1/39 5,390,000 5,810,582 
Series 2016:   
5% 7/1/27 1,500,000 1,723,905 
5% 7/1/29 1,050,000 1,185,555 
5% 7/1/30 605,000 678,725 
5% 7/1/31 400,000 446,592 
5% 3/1/20 1,040,000 1,046,344 
5% 3/1/20 (Pre-Refunded to 3/1/17 @ 100) 990,000 999,692 
5% 3/1/21 1,370,000 1,377,891 
5% 3/1/21 (Pre-Refunded to 3/1/17 @ 100) 1,310,000 1,322,825 
New Jersey Higher Ed. Student Assistance Auth. Student Ln. Rev.:   
Series 2010 1A, 5% 12/1/17 2,500,000 2,589,575 
Series 2013:   
4% 12/1/20 (a) 2,500,000 2,601,925 
5% 12/1/21 (a) 2,100,000 2,275,035 
5% 12/1/22 (a) 2,250,000 2,448,653 
New Jersey Institute of Technology Series 2012 A:   
5% 7/1/32 1,250,000 1,398,475 
5% 7/1/42 5,000,000 5,490,700 
New Jersey Tpk. Auth. Tpk. Rev.:   
Series 2009 E, 5.25% 1/1/40 10,600,000 11,198,158 
Series 2012 B, 5% 1/1/24 2,650,000 3,024,260 
Series 2013 A, 5% 1/1/38 8,000,000 8,720,880 
Series 2014 A, 5% 1/1/32 5,000,000 5,597,300 
Series 2014 C, 5% 1/1/23 3,000,000 3,427,320 
New Jersey Trans. Trust Fund Auth.:   
Series 2001 A, 6% 6/15/35 2,825,000 3,128,292 
Series 2005 B:   
5.25% 12/15/22 (AMBAC Insured) 1,200,000 1,307,100 
5.5% 12/15/20 (Nat'l. Pub. Fin. Guarantee Corp. Insured) 15,235,000 16,815,784 
Series 2006 A, 5.5% 12/15/22 8,875,000 9,735,964 
Series 2006 C:   
0% 12/15/26 (AMBAC Insured) 10,000,000 6,368,900 
0% 12/15/34 4,000,000 1,650,120 
Series 2008 A:   
0% 12/15/36 25,000,000 8,769,000 
5.5% 12/15/38 (Assured Guaranty Corp. Insured) 1,710,000 1,807,316 
Series 2009 A:   
0% 12/15/36 1,915,000 669,082 
0% 12/15/38 13,900,000 4,288,845 
Series 2010 A, 0% 12/15/30 14,750,000 7,357,595 
Series 2010 A3, 0% 12/15/34 10,775,000 4,196,324 
Series 2011 A, 5.25% 6/15/25 6,000,000 6,456,900 
Series 2011 B:   
5.25% 6/15/25 3,185,000 3,427,538 
5.25% 6/15/26 2,000,000 2,147,960 
Series 2016 A, 5% 6/15/30 5,000,000 5,195,850 
New Jersey Transit Corp. Ctfs. of Prtn. Series 2014 A, 5% 9/15/21 5,100,000 5,515,242 
Newark City Hsg. Auth. City-Secured Police Facility Rev. (Southward Police Proj.) Series 2009 A, 6.75% 12/1/38 (Pre-Refunded to 12/1/19 @ 100) 1,000,000 1,150,670 
Newark Gen. Oblig. Series 2013 A:   
5% 7/15/17 2,000,000 2,044,380 
5% 7/15/18 3,130,000 3,265,873 
Newark Port Auth. Hsg. Auth. Rev. (Newark Redev. Proj.) Series 2007, 5.25% 1/1/18 (Nat'l. Pub. Fin. Guarantee Corp. Insured) 1,350,000 1,399,950 
North Hudson Swr. Auth. Wtr. & Swr. Rev. Series 2001 A, 0% 8/1/24 (Escrowed to Maturity) 2,000,000 1,647,340 
Rutgers State Univ. Rev.:   
Series 2009 F, 5% 5/1/30 (Pre-Refunded to 5/1/19 @ 100) 1,500,000 1,623,570 
Series 2010 I, 5% 5/1/29 1,110,000 1,206,848 
Series 2013 L, 5% 5/1/43 5,000,000 5,551,000 
TOTAL NEW JERSEY  462,431,426 
New York And New Jersey - 2.7%   
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey:   
163rd Series, 5% 7/15/35 3,255,000 3,568,457 
166th Series, 5% 1/15/41 5,000,000 5,430,300 
Series 2016, 5% 11/15/32 (a) 5,000,000 5,576,250 
TOTAL NEW YORK AND NEW JERSEY  14,575,007 
Pennsylvania, New Jersey - 4.3%   
Delaware River Joint Toll Bridge Commission Pennsylvania-New Jersey Bridge Rev.:   
Series 2007 A, 5% 7/1/26 (Pre-Refunded to 7/1/17 @ 100) 2,855,000 2,920,808 
Series 2012 A:   
5% 7/1/21 600,000 671,856 
5% 7/1/24 1,200,000 1,363,140 
5% 7/1/25 1,100,000 1,246,476 
5% 7/1/26 500,000 564,910 
Series 2015:   
3% 7/1/27 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 1,000,000 969,910 
5% 7/1/24 275,000 317,845 
5% 7/1/26 650,000 746,551 
5% 7/1/29 300,000 340,197 
5% 7/1/30 350,000 395,217 
Delaware River Port Auth. Pennsylvania & New Jersey Rev.:   
(Port District Proj.) Series 2012, 5% 1/1/24 3,000,000 3,320,220 
Series 2010 D, 5% 1/1/40 4,000,000 4,290,200 
Series 2013, 5% 1/1/31 5,000,000 5,575,500 
TOTAL PENNSYLVANIA, NEW JERSEY  22,722,830 
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS   
(Cost $500,231,957)  507,663,888 
Municipal Notes - 1.3%   
New Jersey - 1.3%   
Newark Gen. Oblig. TAN 2.5% 2/15/17   
(Cost $7,012,137) 7,000,000 7,010,080 
TOTAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 96.8%   
(Cost $507,244,094)  514,673,968 
NET OTHER ASSETS (LIABILITIES) - 3.2%  17,064,039 
NET ASSETS - 100%  $531,738,007 

Security Type Abbreviations

TAN – TAX ANTICIPATION NOTE

Legend

 (a) Private activity obligations whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals.

 (b) Security or a portion of the security purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis.


Investment Valuation

All investments are categorized as Level 2 under the Fair Value Hierarchy. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities may not be an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For more information on valuation inputs please refer to the Investment Valuation section in the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

Other Information

The distribution of municipal securities by revenue source, as a percentage of total Net Assets, is as follows (Unaudited):

General Obligations 36.5% 
Health Care 19.3% 
Transportation 16.4% 
Education 11.3% 
Escrowed/Pre-Refunded 8.9% 
Others* (Individually Less Than 5%) 7.6% 
 100.0% 

* Includes net other assets

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

  November 30, 2016 
Assets   
Investment in securities, at value — See accompanying schedule:
Unaffiliated issuers (cost $507,244,094) 
 $514,673,968 
Cash  11,332,315 
Receivable for investments sold  6,371,434 
Receivable for fund shares sold  191,997 
Interest receivable  7,878,195 
Prepaid expenses  1,232 
Other receivables  1,049 
Total assets  540,450,190 
Liabilities   
Payable for investments purchased on a delayed delivery basis $7,269,194  
Payable for fund shares redeemed 777,183  
Distributions payable 410,002  
Accrued management fee 164,853  
Other affiliated payables 46,212  
Other payables and accrued expenses 44,739  
Total liabilities  8,712,183 
Net Assets  $531,738,007 
Net Assets consist of:   
Paid in capital  $520,236,658 
Distributions in excess of net investment income  (26,615) 
Accumulated undistributed net realized gain (loss) on investments  4,098,090 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments  7,429,874 
Net Assets, for 46,053,435 shares outstanding  $531,738,007 
Net Asset Value, offering price and redemption price per share ($531,738,007 ÷ 46,053,435 shares)  $11.55 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Statement of Operations

  Year ended November 30, 2016 
Investment Income   
Interest  $19,334,376 
Expenses   
Management fee $2,017,346  
Transfer agent fees 411,961  
Accounting fees and expenses 138,851  
Custodian fees and expenses 4,258  
Independent trustees' fees and expenses 2,552  
Registration fees 19,022  
Audit 55,108  
Legal 4,104  
Miscellaneous 2,733  
Total expenses before reductions 2,655,935  
Expense reductions (6,442) 2,649,493 
Net investment income (loss)  16,684,883 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)   
Net realized gain (loss) on:   
Investment securities:   
Unaffiliated issuers 4,325,559  
Total net realized gain (loss)  4,325,559 
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investment securities  (14,798,377) 
Net gain (loss)  (10,472,818) 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations  $6,212,065 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Statement of Changes in Net Assets

 Year ended November 30, 2016 Year ended November 30, 2015 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   
Operations   
Net investment income (loss) $16,684,883 $18,030,006 
Net realized gain (loss) 4,325,559 799,727 
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) (14,798,377) (10,486,548) 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations 6,212,065 8,343,185 
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income (16,713,038) (18,001,825) 
Distributions to shareholders from net realized gain (787,020) (1,101,159) 
Total distributions (17,500,058) (19,102,984) 
Share transactions   
Proceeds from sales of shares 57,361,175 50,452,523 
Reinvestment of distributions 12,024,881 12,776,633 
Cost of shares redeemed (72,019,336) (104,646,677) 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from share transactions (2,633,280) (41,417,521) 
Redemption fees 690 340 
Total increase (decrease) in net assets (13,920,583) (52,176,980) 
Net Assets   
Beginning of period 545,658,590 597,835,570 
End of period $531,738,007 $545,658,590 
Other Information   
Undistributed net investment income end of period $– $3,999 
Distributions in excess of net investment income end of period $(26,615) $– 
Shares   
Sold 4,752,256 4,236,400 
Issued in reinvestment of distributions 997,398 1,077,031 
Redeemed (5,985,470) (8,848,256) 
Net increase (decrease) (235,816) (3,534,825) 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Financial Highlights — Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

Years ended November 30, 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 
Selected Per–Share Data      
Net asset value, beginning of period $11.79 $12.00 $11.58 $12.49 $11.72 
Income from Investment Operations      
Net investment income (loss)A .360 .373 .387 .397 .412 
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) (.219) (.189) .489 (.884) .769 
Total from investment operations .141 .184 .876 (.487) 1.181 
Distributions from net investment income (.364) (.372) (.386) (.397) (.411) 
Distributions from net realized gain (.017) (.022) (.070) (.026) – 
Total distributions (.381) (.394) (.456) (.423) (.411) 
Redemption fees added to paid in capitalA,B – – – – – 
Net asset value, end of period $11.55 $11.79 $12.00 $11.58 $12.49 
Total ReturnC 1.08% 1.56% 7.71% (3.94)% 10.21% 
Ratios to Average Net AssetsD      
Expenses before reductions .47% .48% .48% .47% .47% 
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any .47% .48% .48% .47% .47% 
Expenses net of all reductions .47% .48% .48% .47% .47% 
Net investment income (loss) 2.98% 3.15% 3.27% 3.32% 3.38% 
Supplemental Data      
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted) $531,738 $545,659 $597,836 $599,906 $702,932 
Portfolio turnover rate 15% 7% 12% 18% 11% 

 A Calculated based on average shares outstanding during the period.

 B Amount represents less than $.0005 per share.

 C Total returns would have been lower if certain expenses had not been reduced during the applicable periods shown.

 D Expense ratios reflect operating expenses of the Fund. Expenses before reductions do not reflect amounts reimbursed by the investment adviser or reductions from expense offset arrangements and do not represent the amount paid by the Fund during periods when reimbursements or reductions occur. Expenses net of fee waivers reflect expenses after reimbursement by the investment adviser but prior to reductions from expense offset arrangements. Expenses net of all reductions represent the net expenses paid by the Fund.


See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund

Investment Summary/Performance (Unaudited)

Effective Maturity Diversification

Days % of fund's investments 11/30/16 % of fund's investments 5/31/16 % of fund's investments 11/30/15 
1 - 7 67.5 68.5 72.0 
8 - 30 7.2 8.6 8.9 
31 - 60 4.4 5.2 0.7 
61 - 90 1.7 3.1 3.3 
91 - 180 5.0 6.2 3.4 
> 180 14.2 8.4 11.7 

Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Asset Allocation (% of fund's net assets)

As of November 30, 2016 
   Variable Rate Demand Notes (VRDNs) 49.4% 
   Tender Option Bond 12.0% 
   Other Municipal Security 31.5% 
   Investment Companies 8.5% 
 Net Other Assets (Liabilities)* (1.4)% 


 * Net Other Assets (Liabilities) are not included in the pie chart.


As of May 31, 2016 
   Variable Rate Demand Notes (VRDNs) 54.4% 
   Tender Option Bond 8.4% 
   Other Municipal Security 30.8% 
   Investment Companies 6.4% 


Current And Historical 7-Day Yields

 11/30/16 8/31/16 5/31/16 2/29/16 11/30/15 
Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund 0.13% 0.13% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 

Yield refers to the income paid by the Fund over a given period. Yields for money market funds are usually for seven-day periods, as they are here, though they are expressed as annual percentage rates. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Yield will vary and it's possible to lose money investing in the Fund.

Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund

Investments November 30, 2016

Showing Percentage of Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Note - 49.4%   
 Principal Amount Value 
Alabama - 0.1%   
Decatur Indl. Dev. Board Exempt Facilities Rev. (Nucor Steel Decatur LLC Proj.) Series 2003 A, 0.84% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) $1,400,000 $1,400,000 
Alaska - 0.4%   
Valdez Marine Term. Rev. (Phillips Trans. Alaska, Inc. Proj.) Series 1994 C, 0.6% 12/7/16, VRDN (b) 5,500,000 5,500,000 
Arkansas - 0.6%   
Blytheville Indl. Dev. Rev. (Nucor Corp. Proj.) Series 2002, 0.79% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 500,000 500,000 
Osceola Solid Waste Disp. Rev. (Plum Point Energy Associates, LLC Proj.) Series 2006, 0.79% 12/7/16, LOC Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, VRDN (a)(b) 8,900,000 8,900,000 
  9,400,000 
Delaware - 0.1%   
Delaware Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev. (Delmarva Pwr. & Lt. Co. Proj.):   
Series 1988, 0.78% 12/1/16, VRDN (a)(b) 800,000 800,000 
Series 1993 C, 0.74% 12/7/16, VRDN (b) 400,000 400,000 
Series 1994, 0.78% 12/1/16, VRDN (a)(b) 500,000 500,000 
  1,700,000 
Delaware, New Jersey - 1.5%   
Delaware River & Bay Auth. Rev. Series 2008, 0.56% 12/7/16, LOC TD Banknorth, NA, VRDN (b) 22,700,000 22,700,000 
Georgia - 0.4%   
Bartow County Dev. Auth. Poll. Cont. Rev. (Georgia Pwr. Co. Plant Bowen Proj.) First Series 2009, 0.62% 12/7/16, VRDN (b) 5,500,000 5,500,000 
Monroe County Dev. Auth. Poll. Cont. Rev. (Georgia Pwr. Co. Plant Scherer Proj.) First Series 2009, 0.64% 12/7/16, VRDN (b) 300,000 300,000 
  5,800,000 
Illinois - 0.1%   
Illinois Fin. Auth. Multi-family Rev. (Villagebrook Apts Proj.) Series 2005, 0.61% 12/7/16, LOC Freddie Mac, VRDN (a)(b) 590,000 590,000 
Indiana - 0.0%   
Indiana Dev. Fin. Auth. Envir. Rev. (PSI Energy Proj.) Series 2003 B, 0.68% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 300,000 300,000 
Iowa - 0.6%   
Iowa Fin. Auth. Solid Disp. Waste Rev. (MidAmerican Energy Proj.) Series 2008 A, 0.67% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 9,200,000 9,200,000 
Kentucky - 0.3%   
Trimble County Poll. Cont. Rev. (Louisville Gas and Elec. Co. Proj.) Series 2016 A, 0.67% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 3,600,000 3,600,000 
Louisiana - 0.0%   
Saint James Parish Gen. Oblig. (Nucor Steel Louisiana LLC Proj.) Series 2010 A1, 0.79% 12/7/16, VRDN (b) 500,000 500,000 
Nebraska - 0.1%   
Stanton County Indl. Dev. Rev. (Nucor Corp. Proj.) Series 1996, 0.84% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 1,400,000 1,400,000 
Nevada - 0.1%   
Washoe County Gas Facilities Rev.:   
Series 2016 C, 0.62% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 800,000 800,000 
Series 2016 D, 0.61% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 500,000 500,000 
Series 2016 E, 0.62% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 500,000 500,000 
  1,800,000 
New Jersey - 31.6%   
Bergen County Impt. Auth. Multi-family Hsg. Rev. (Kentshire Apts. Proj.) Series 2001, 0.54% 12/7/16, LOC Fannie Mae, VRDN (a)(b) 21,000,000 21,000,000 
Essex County Impt. Auth. Multi-family Hsg. Rev. (Fern Sr. Hsg. Proj.) Series 2010, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC Freddie Mac, VRDN (b) 4,000,000 4,000,000 
Hudson County Impt. Auth. Rev. (Essential Purp. Pooled Govt. Ln. Prog.) Series 1986, 0.53% 12/7/16, LOC TD Banknorth, NA, VRDN (b) 29,800,000 29,800,000 
New Jersey Econ. Dev. Auth. Natural Gas Facilities Rev. (South Jersey Gas Co. Proj.) Series 2006-1, 0.58% 12/7/16, LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank, VRDN (a)(b) 24,900,000 24,900,000 
New Jersey Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev.:   
(Applewood Estates Proj.) Series 2005 B, 0.52% 12/7/16, LOC TD Banknorth, NA, VRDN (b) 9,375,000 9,375,000 
(Bayshore Health Ctr. Proj.) Series 1998 A, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank, VRDN (b) 9,270,000 9,270,000 
(Cooper Health Sys. Proj.) Series 2008 A, 0.52% 12/7/16, LOC TD Banknorth, NA, VRDN (b) 15,000,000 15,000,000 
New Jersey Econ. Dev. Auth. Spl. Facilities Rev. (Port Newark Container Term. LLC Proj.) Series 2003 A, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC Royal Bank of Canada, VRDN (a)(b) 62,500,000 62,500,000 
New Jersey Econ. Dev. Auth. Thermal Energy Facilities Rev. (Marina Energy LLC Proj.):   
Series 2001 A, 0.61% 12/7/16, LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank, VRDN (a)(b) 10,000,000 10,000,000 
Series 2006 A, 0.61% 12/7/16, LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank, VRDN (a)(b) 5,465,000 5,465,000 
New Jersey Health Care Facilities Fing. Auth. Rev.:   
(AHS Hosp. Corp. Proj.):   
Series 2008 B, 0.57% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (b) 47,080,000 47,080,000 
Series 2008 C, 0.57% 12/7/16, LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank, VRDN (b) 27,175,000 27,175,000 
(Barnabas Health Proj.) Series 2011 B, 0.52% 12/7/16, LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank, VRDN (b) 25,910,000 25,910,000 
(Meridian Health Sys. Proj.):   
Series 2003 A, 0.57% 12/7/16, LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank, VRDN (b) 12,750,000 12,750,000 
Series 2006 A4, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (b) 4,385,000 4,385,000 
Series 2006 A5, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (b) 1,575,000 1,575,000 
(Meridian Nursing and Rehab. at Red Bank, Inc. Proj.) Series 2004 A3, 0.52% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (b) 10,735,000 10,735,000 
(Southern Ocean County Hosp. Proj.) Series 2006, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (b) 3,400,000 3,400,000 
(Virtua Health Proj.):   
Series 2003 A7, 0.52% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (b) 1,600,000 1,600,000 
Series 2004, 0.52% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (b) 31,325,000 31,325,000 
Series 2009 D, 0.52% 12/7/16, LOC TD Banknorth, NA, VRDN (b) 16,800,000 16,800,000 
Series 2006 A6, 0.52% 12/1/16, LOC TD Banknorth, NA, VRDN (b) 900,000 900,000 
New Jersey Hsg. & Mtg. Fin. Agcy. Multi-family Rev.:   
Series 2006 A, 0.59% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (a)(b) 9,865,000 9,865,000 
Series 2008 B, 0.53% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (b) 13,685,000 13,685,000 
Series 2008 F, 0.56% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (a)(b) 48,645,000 48,645,000 
Series 2015 F, 0.56% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (a)(b) 2,335,000 2,335,000 
Vineland Gen. Oblig. 0.6% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (a)(b) 19,815,000 19,815,000 
  469,290,000 
Pennsylvania, New Jersey - 9.8%   
Delaware River Port Auth. Pennsylvania & New Jersey Rev.:   
Series 2008 B, 0.52% 12/7/16, LOC TD Banknorth, NA, VRDN (b) 45,160,000 45,160,000 
Series 2010 B, 0.56% 12/7/16, LOC Barclays Bank PLC, VRDN (b) 101,000,000 101,000,000 
  146,160,000 
New York And New Jersey - 3.3%   
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey:   
Series 1991 1, 0.63% 12/30/16, VRDN (a)(b)(c) 8,800,000 8,800,000 
Series 1991 3, 0.63% 12/30/16, VRDN (a)(b)(c) 9,800,000 9,800,000 
Series 1992 1, 0.6% 12/30/16, VRDN (b)(c) 6,800,000 6,800,000 
Series 1995 3, 0.63% 12/30/16, VRDN (a)(b)(c) 9,400,000 9,400,000 
Series 1995 4, 0.63% 12/30/16, VRDN (a)(b)(c) 10,500,000 10,500,000 
Series 1997 1, 0.6% 12/30/16, VRDN (b)(c) 1,500,000 1,500,000 
Series 1997 2, 0.6% 12/30/16, VRDN (b)(c) 2,000,000 2,000,000 
  48,800,000 
Texas - 0.2%   
Port Arthur Navigation District Envir. Facilities Rev. (Motiva Enterprises LLC Proj.) Series 2004, 0.77% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 2,400,000 2,400,000 
Port Port Arthur Navigation District Jefferson County Rev. Series 2000 B, 0.69% 12/7/16 (Total SA Guaranteed), VRDN (a)(b) 500,000 500,000 
  2,900,000 
West Virginia - 0.1%   
West Virginia Econ. Dev. Auth. Solid Waste Disp. Facilities Rev. (Appalachian Pwr. Co. - Amos Proj.) Series 2008 B, 0.86% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 1,500,000 1,500,000 
Wyoming - 0.1%   
Lincoln County Envir. (PacifiCorp Proj.) Series 1995, 0.67% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 1,650,000 1,650,000 
TOTAL VARIABLE RATE DEMAND NOTE   
(Cost $734,190,000)  734,190,000 
Tender Option Bond - 12.0%   
Nebraska - 0.0%   
Omaha Pub. Pwr. District Elec. Rev. Participating VRDN Series 16 XF1053, 0.73% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch) (b)(d) 800,000 800,000 
New Jersey - 5.5%   
Clipper Tax-Exempt Trust Participating VRDN Series Clipper 07 20, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility State Street Bank & Trust Co., Boston) (b)(d) 13,230,000 13,230,000 
Hudson County Impt. Lease Rev. Participating VRDN Series 16 ZF0450, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Toronto-Dominion Bank) (b)(d) 4,275,000 4,275,000 
New Jersey Edl. Facilities Auth. Rev. Participating VRDN:   
Series 15 XF0099, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (b)(d) 4,335,000 4,335,000 
Series 15 XF0149, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Bank of America NA) (b)(d) 2,670,000 2,670,000 
Series Floaters L 36, 0.62% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (a)(b)(d) 6,900,000 6,900,000 
New Jersey Envir. Infrastructure Trust Participating VRDN Series 16 XF0395, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Bank of America NA) (b)(d) 2,015,000 2,015,000 
New Jersey St Higher Ed. Assistance Auth. Participating VRDN Series Floaters L 35, 0.62% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (a)(b)(d) 11,090,000 11,090,000 
New Jersey St. Trans. Trust Fund Auth. Participating VRDN Series Floaters 16 XF1059, 0.74% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch) (b)(d) 17,000,000 17,000,000 
New Jersey Trans. Trust Fund Auth. Participating VRDN Series Floaters XF 23 70, 0.65% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Barclays Bank PLC) (b)(d) 7,245,000 7,245,000 
Union County Utils. Resources Auth. Participating VRDN Series 16 ZM0165, 0.62% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (a)(b)(d) 13,140,000 13,140,000 
  81,900,000 
New York And New Jersey - 6.4%   
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Participating VRDN:   
Series 15 ZF0203, 0.63% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(b)(d) 1,675,000 1,675,000 
Series 16 XF 0331, 0.64% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Bank of America NA) (a)(b)(d) 3,310,000 3,310,000 
Series 16 XF0398, 0.63% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(b)(d) 22,610,000 22,610,000 
Series 16 XF0401, 0.63% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(b)(d) 13,510,000 13,510,000 
Series 16 XF0407, 0.63% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(b)(d) 6,170,000 6,170,000 
Series 16 XF2211, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Morgan Stanley Bank, West Valley City Utah) (b)(d) 7,610,000 7,610,000 
Series 16 XM0211, 0.63% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(b)(d) 6,000,000 6,000,000 
Series 16 ZF0367, 0.63% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(b)(d) 7,155,000 7,155,000 
Series 16 ZM0160, 0.62% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (a)(b)(d) 3,470,000 3,470,000 
Series Floaters YX 10 34, 0.63% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Barclays Bank PLC) (a)(b)(d) 780,000 780,000 
Series Floaters ZM 04 10, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (b)(d) 800,000 800,000 
Series MS 3321, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Cr. Suisse AG) (a)(b)(d) 5,005,000 5,005,000 
Series ROC 14086, 0.61% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Citibank NA) (a)(b)(d) 2,160,000 2,160,000 
Series ROC II R 14077, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Citibank NA) (b)(d) 5,165,000 5,165,000 
Series TD 0013, 0.62% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Toronto-Dominion Bank) (a)(b)(d) 2,375,000 2,375,000 
Series XG 00 37, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Morgan Stanley Bank, West Valley City Utah) (a)(b)(d) 4,400,000 4,400,000 
The Port Auth. of New York and New Jersey Participating VRDN Series XF 23 60, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Citibank NA) (b)(d) 2,400,000 2,400,000 
  94,595,000 
South Carolina - 0.1%   
South Carolina St. Pub. Svc. Auth. Rev. Participating VRDN Series XG 0046, 0.64% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Toronto-Dominion Bank) (b)(d) 1,800,000 1,800,000 
TOTAL TENDER OPTION BOND   
(Cost $179,095,000)  179,095,000 
Other Municipal Security - 31.5%   
Georgia - 0.6%   
Main Street Natural Gas, Inc. Georgia Gas Proj. Rev. Bonds:   
Series 2010 A1, 0.66%, tender 2/1/17 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (b) 5,200,000 5,200,000 
Series 2010 A2, 0.66%, tender 2/1/17 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (b) 3,500,000 3,500,000 
  8,700,000 
Kentucky - 0.0%   
Jefferson County Poll. Cont. Rev. Bonds Series 01A, 0.77% tender 12/15/16, CP mode 800,000 800,000 
Massachusetts - 0.3%   
Massachusetts Indl. Fin. Agcy. Poll. Cont. Rev. Bonds (New England Pwr. Co. Proj.):   
Series 1992:   
0.85% tender 12/16/16, CP mode 100,000 100,000 
0.85% tender 12/19/16, CP mode 800,000 800,000 
Series 1993 A, 0.8% tender 12/15/16, CP mode 2,300,000 2,300,000 
Series 93B, 0.8% tender 1/4/17, CP mode 1,200,000 1,200,000 
  4,400,000 
New Hampshire - 0.5%   
New Hampshire Bus. Fin. Auth. Poll. Cont. Rev. Bonds:   
(New England Pwr. Co. Proj.) Series 1990 B, 0.85% tender 12/8/16, CP mode 1,400,000 1,400,000 
Series 1990 A:   
0.9% tender 12/16/16, CP mode (a) 2,700,000 2,700,000 
0.9% tender 12/19/16, CP mode (a) 900,000 900,000 
Series A1:   
0.88% tender 12/21/16, CP mode (a) 200,000 200,000 
1.02% tender 12/1/16, CP mode (a) 2,300,000 2,300,000 
  7,500,000 
New Jersey - 24.9%   
Bergen County Gen. Oblig. BAN 2% 12/15/16 2,000,000 2,001,061 
Chester Township Gen. Oblig. BAN 2% 2/17/17 3,978,500 3,990,037 
Cranford Township Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 6/30/17 (e) 4,700,000 4,724,863 
Edgewater Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 7/21/17 18,500,000 18,655,335 
Englewood Gen. Oblig. BAN 2.25% 4/6/17 22,300,000 22,408,378 
Evesham Township BAN Series 2016 A, 2% 5/16/17 7,071,418 7,108,730 
Fairfield TWP NJ BD NTS. BAN Series 2016, 2% 6/16/17 5,000,000 5,028,332 
Haddonfield BAN:   
Series 2016, 2.25% 6/23/17 11,875,000 11,969,112 
2% 6/23/17 5,725,738 5,763,366 
Hamilton Township Mercer County BAN Series 2016, 2% 6/8/17 15,100,000 15,182,791 
Harrison Township BAN:   
Series 2016 A, 2.25% 6/1/17 5,223,490 5,257,547 
Series B, 1.5% 6/1/17 14,100,000 14,150,569 
Hazlet Township NJ BAN Series 2016, 2% 6/16/17 3,546,237 3,566,334 
Hoboken Gen. Oblig. BAN Series A, 2.25% 3/14/17 9,000,000 9,040,476 
Hopatcong Borough Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 7/27/17 4,800,000 4,836,312 
Hopewell Township Gen. Oblig. BAN 2.25% 4/7/17 3,013,145 3,026,638 
Hudson County Gen. Oblig. BAN:   
Series 2015, 2% 12/16/16 23,000,000 23,012,919 
Series 2016, 2.5% 12/14/17 (e) 14,700,000 14,888,307 
Lakewood Township Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016 A, 2% 3/17/17 5,580,000 5,599,613 
Mercer County Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016 B, 2% 8/30/17 15,200,000 15,320,129 
Morris Plains BAN Series 2016, 2.25% 6/30/17 9,475,000 9,550,478 
New Jersey Edl. Facilities Auth. Rev. Series 1997 A, 0.88% 1/5/17, CP 5,700,000 5,700,000 
North Wildwood Gen. Oblig. BAN:   
Series 2016, 2% 8/24/17 7,840,000 7,905,706 
2.25% 5/10/17 4,830,000 4,855,979 
Ocean City Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016 A, 1.5% 1/6/17 20,100,000 20,116,068 
Old Bridge Township Gen. Oblig. BAN 2.25% 4/13/17 13,210,000 13,280,181 
Passaic County Gen. Oblig.:   
BAN Series 2015 A, 2% 12/13/16 9,980,000 9,983,717 
Bonds Series 2011, 5% 5/1/17 2,780,000 2,827,880 
Robbinsville Township Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016 A, 2% 7/27/17 15,966,831 16,102,237 
Sea Isle City BAN Series 2016, 1.5% 1/10/17 8,140,000 8,147,653 
South Brunswick Township BAN 2% 1/27/17 14,482,000 14,511,333 
Sparta Township Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016 A, 2% 10/27/17 4,600,000 4,642,837 
Sussex County Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2.25% 6/28/17 7,500,000 7,565,234 
Tewksbury Township Gen. Oblig. BAN 2% 6/1/17 3,150,000 3,168,223 
Township of Bridgewater BAN Series 2016, 2% 8/15/17 14,032,317 14,161,807 
Township of Lawrence BAN Series 2016, 2% 7/21/17 7,600,000 7,660,867 
Union County Gen. Oblig. Bonds Series 2016 B, 2% 3/1/17 3,750,000 3,762,451 
Verona Township Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 7/21/17 8,562,500 8,630,531 
Washington Township Gloucester County BAN Series 2016 B, 2% 4/25/17 2,990,000 3,005,103 
Woodbridge Township Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 8/18/17 8,750,000 8,831,688 
  369,940,822 
New York And New Jersey - 5.0%   
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey:   
Bonds Series 197, 4% 11/15/17 (a) 6,600,000 6,787,878 
Series A:   
0.6% 12/5/16, CP (a) 14,000,000 14,000,000 
0.64% 2/9/17, CP (a) 6,000,000 6,000,000 
0.65% 2/14/17, CP (a) 11,000,000 11,000,000 
0.78% 2/1/17, CP (a) 5,000,000 5,000,000 
0.8% 12/14/16, CP (a) 3,000,000 3,000,000 
0.82% 12/19/16, CP (a) 7,440,000 7,440,000 
0.88% 1/5/17, CP (a) 5,000,000 5,000,000 
0.88% 1/19/17, CP (a) 6,500,000 6,500,000 
Series B:   
0.77% 1/18/17, CP 1,500,000 1,500,000 
0.84% 12/7/16, CP 3,000,000 3,000,000 
0.84% 12/13/16, CP 3,000,000 3,000,000 
0.9% 1/4/17, CP 3,000,000 3,000,000 
  75,227,878 
Virginia - 0.1%   
Halifax County Indl. Dev. Auth. Poll. Cont. Rev. Bonds Series 1992, 0.83% tender 12/16/16, CP mode (a) 1,400,000 1,400,000 
West Virginia - 0.1%   
Grant County Cmnty. Solid Waste Disp. Rev. Bonds Series 96, 0.9% tender 12/19/16, CP mode (a) 1,100,000 1,099,999 
TOTAL OTHER MUNICIPAL SECURITY   
(Cost $469,068,699)  469,068,699 
 Shares Value 
Investment Company - 8.5%   
Fidelity Municipal Cash Central Fund, 0.60% (f)(g)   
(Cost $125,580,001) 125,580,001 125,580,001 
TOTAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 101.4%   
   
(Cost $1,507,933,700)  1,507,933,700 
NET OTHER ASSETS (LIABILITIES) - (1.4)%  (20,758,475) 
NET ASSETS - 100%  $1,487,175,225 

Security Type Abbreviations

BAN – BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE

CP – COMMERCIAL PAPER

VRDN – VARIABLE RATE DEMAND NOTE (A debt instrument that is payable upon demand, either daily, weekly or monthly)

The date shown for securities represents the date when principal payments must be paid, taking into account any call options exercised by the issuer and any permissible maturity shortening features other than interest rate resets.

Legend

 (a) Private activity obligations whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals.

 (b) Coupon rates for floating and adjustable rate securities reflect the rates in effect at period end.

 (c) Restricted securities - Investment in securities not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (excluding 144A issues). At the end of the period, the value of restricted securities (excluding 144A issues) amounted to $48,800,000 or 3.3% of net assets.

 (d) Provides evidence of ownership in one or more underlying municipal bonds.

 (e) Security or a portion of the security purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis.

 (f) Information in this report regarding holdings by state and security types does not reflect the holdings of the Fidelity Municipal Cash Central Fund.

 (g) Affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies and other accounts managed by Fidelity Investments. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. A complete unaudited listing of the fund's holdings as of its most recent quarter end is available upon request. In addition, each Fidelity Central Fund's financial statements, which are not covered by the Fund's Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are available on the SEC's website or upon request.


Additional information on each restricted holding is as follows:

Security Acquisition Date Cost 
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Series 1991 1, 0.63% 12/30/16, VRDN 6/18/91 $8,800,000 
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Series 1991 3, 0.63% 12/30/16, VRDN 12/3/03 $9,800,000 
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Series 1992 1, 0.6% 12/30/16, VRDN 2/14/92 $6,800,000 
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Series 1995 3, 0.63% 12/30/16, VRDN 9/15/95 $9,400,000 
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Series 1995 4, 0.63% 12/30/16, VRDN 8/9/02 $10,500,000 
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Series 1997 1, 0.6% 12/30/16, VRDN 1/27/16 $1,500,000 
Port Auth. of New York & New Jersey Series 1997 2, 0.6% 12/30/16, VRDN 10/26/12 - 11/8/13 $2,000,000 

Affiliated Central Funds

Information regarding fiscal year to date income earned by the Fund from investments in Fidelity Central Funds is as follows:

Fund Income earned 
Fidelity Municipal Cash Central Fund $547,682 
Total $547,682 

Investment Valuation

All investments are categorized as Level 2 under the Fair Value Hierarchy. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities may not be an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For more information on valuation inputs please refer to the Investment Valuation section in the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund

Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

  November 30, 2016 
Assets   
Investment in securities, at value — See accompanying schedule:
Unaffiliated issuers (cost $1,382,353,699) 
$1,382,353,699  
Fidelity Central Funds (cost $125,580,001) 125,580,001  
Total Investments (cost $1,507,933,700)  $1,507,933,700 
Cash  37,240 
Receivable for fund shares sold  22,083 
Interest receivable  4,170,835 
Distributions receivable from Fidelity Central Funds  53,253 
Prepaid expenses  4,005 
Receivable from investment adviser for expense reductions  1,416 
Other receivables  371 
Total assets  1,512,222,903 
Liabilities   
Payable for investments purchased   
Regular delivery $2,500,800  
Delayed delivery 19,613,170  
Payable for fund shares redeemed 2,279,702  
Distributions payable 4,674  
Accrued management fee 454,413  
Other affiliated payables 157,849  
Other payables and accrued expenses 37,070  
Total liabilities  25,047,678 
Net Assets  $1,487,175,225 
Net Assets consist of:   
Paid in capital  $1,487,141,423 
Accumulated undistributed net realized gain (loss) on investments  33,802 
Net Assets, for 1,485,330,391 shares outstanding  $1,487,175,225 
Net Asset Value, offering price and redemption price per share ($1,487,175,225 ÷ 1,485,330,391 shares)  $1.00 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Statement of Operations

  Year ended November 30, 2016 
Investment Income   
Interest  $6,959,714 
Income from Fidelity Central Funds  547,682 
Total income  7,507,396 
Expenses   
Management fee $7,213,341  
Transfer agent fees 2,396,625  
Accounting fees and expenses 195,139  
Custodian fees and expenses 14,323  
Independent trustees' fees and expenses 9,314  
Registration fees 38,228  
Audit 40,687  
Legal 9,517  
Miscellaneous 21,689  
Total expenses before reductions 9,938,863  
Expense reductions (3,518,564) 6,420,299 
Net investment income (loss)  1,087,097 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)   
Net realized gain (loss) on:   
Investment securities:   
Unaffiliated issuers (5,446)  
Capital gain distributions from Fidelity Central Funds 56,585  
Total net realized gain (loss)  51,139 
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations  $1,138,236 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Statement of Changes in Net Assets

 Year ended November 30, 2016 Year ended November 30, 2015 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   
Operations   
Net investment income (loss) $1,087,097 $238,243 
Net realized gain (loss) 51,139 36,494 
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations 1,138,236 274,737 
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income (1,087,328) (238,191) 
Share transactions at net asset value of $1.00 per share   
Proceeds from sales of shares 2,454,783,123 5,014,620,752 
Reinvestment of distributions 1,052,252 227,586 
Cost of shares redeemed (3,307,361,825) (5,034,004,487) 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets and shares resulting from share transactions (851,526,450) (19,156,149) 
Total increase (decrease) in net assets (851,475,542) (19,119,603) 
Net Assets   
Beginning of period 2,338,650,767 2,357,770,370 
End of period $1,487,175,225 $2,338,650,767 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Financial Highlights — Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund

Years ended November 30, 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 
Selected Per–Share Data      
Net asset value, beginning of period $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 
Income from Investment Operations      
Net investment income (loss) .001 A A A A 
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)A – – – – – 
Total from investment operations .001 A A A A 
Distributions from net investment income (.001) A A A A 
Net asset value, end of period $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 
Total ReturnB .07% .01% .01% .01% .01% 
Ratios to Average Net AssetsC,D      
Expenses before reductions .50% .51% .50% .51% .51% 
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any .32% .08% .09% .15% .22% 
Expenses net of all reductions .32% .08% .09% .15% .22% 
Net investment income (loss) .05% .01% .01% .01% .01% 
Supplemental Data      
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted) $1,487,175 $2,338,651 $2,357,770 $2,461,337 $2,254,923 

 A Amount represents less than $.0005 per share.

 B Total returns would have been lower if certain expenses had not been reduced during the applicable periods shown.

 C Fees and expenses of any underlying Fidelity Central Funds are not included in the Fund's expense ratio. The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of any underlying Fidelity Central Funds.

 D Expense ratios reflect operating expenses of the Fund. Expenses before reductions do not reflect amounts reimbursed or waived or reductions from expense offset arrangements and do not represent the amount paid by the Fund during periods when reimbursements, waivers or reductions occur. Expenses net of fee waivers reflect expenses after reimbursement and waivers but prior to reductions from expense offset arrangements. Expenses net of all reductions represent the net expenses paid by the Fund.


See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Notes to Financial Statements

For the period ended November 30, 2016

1. Organization.

Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund (the Income Fund) is a fund of Fidelity Court Street Trust. Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund (the Money Market Fund) is a fund of Fidelity Court Street Trust II. Each Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. Fidelity Court Street Trust and Fidelity Court Street Trust II (the Trusts) are organized as a Massachusetts business trust and a Delaware statutory trust, respectively. The Income Fund is a non-diversified fund. Each Fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. Share transactions on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets may contain exchanges between affiliated funds. Effective January 1, 2016 shares of the Money Market Fund are only available for purchase by retail shareholders. Each Fund may be affected by economic and political developments in the state of New Jersey.

2. Investments in Fidelity Central Funds.

The Funds may invest in Fidelity Central Funds, which are open-end investment companies generally available only to other investment companies and accounts managed by the investment adviser and its affiliates. The Funds' Schedules of Investments list each of the Fidelity Central Funds held as of period end, if any, as an investment of each Fund, but do not include the underlying holdings of each Fidelity Central Fund. As an Investing Fund, each Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of the underlying Fidelity Central Funds.

The Money Market Central Funds seek preservation of capital and current income and are managed by Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM), an affiliate of the investment adviser. Annualized expenses of the Money Market Central Funds as of their most recent shareholder report date are less than .005%.

A complete unaudited list of holdings for each Fidelity Central Fund is available upon request or at the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the financial statements of the Fidelity Central Funds, which are not covered by the Funds' Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are available on the SEC website or upon request.

3. Significant Accounting Policies.

The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), which require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Subsequent events, if any, through the date that the financial statements were issued have been evaluated in the preparation of the financial statements. The following summarizes the significant accounting policies of the Funds:

Investment Valuation. Investments are valued as of 4:00 p.m. Eastern time on the last calendar day of the period. The Board of Trustees (the Board) has delegated the day to day responsibility for the valuation of the Income Fund's investments to the Fair Value Committee (the Committee) established by the Income Fund's investment adviser. In accordance with valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board, the Income Fund attempts to obtain prices from one or more third party pricing vendors or brokers to value its investments. When current market prices, quotations or currency exchange rates are not readily available or reliable, investments will be fair valued in good faith by the Committee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board. Factors used in determining fair value vary by investment type and may include market or investment specific events, changes in interest rates and credit quality. The frequency with which these procedures are used cannot be predicted and they may be utilized to a significant extent. The Committee oversees the Income Fund's valuation policies and procedures and reports to the Board on the Committee's activities and fair value determinations. The Board monitors the appropriateness of the procedures used in valuing the Income Fund's investments and ratifies the fair value determinations of the Committee.

Each Fund categorizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to value its investments into a disclosure hierarchy consisting of three levels as shown below:

  • Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
  • Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, etc.)
  • Level 3 – unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions based on the best information available)

Valuation techniques used to value each Fund's investments by major category are as follows:

For the Income Fund, debt securities, including restricted securities, are valued based on evaluated prices received from third party pricing vendors or from brokers who make markets in such securities. Municipal securities are valued by pricing vendors who utilize matrix pricing which considers yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type or by broker-supplied prices. When independent prices are unavailable or unreliable, debt securities may be valued utilizing pricing methodologies which consider similar factors that would be used by third party pricing vendors. Debt securities are generally categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy but may be Level 3 depending on the circumstances.

For the Money Market Fund, as permitted by compliance with certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The amortized cost of an instrument is determined by valuing it at its original cost and thereafter amortizing any discount or premium from its face value at a constant rate until maturity. Securities held by a money market fund are generally high quality and liquid; however, they are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value are not quoted prices in an active market.

For the Income Fund, changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy.

Investment Transactions and Income. For financial reporting purposes, the Funds' investment holdings and net asset value (NAV) include trades executed through the end of the last business day of the period. The NAV per share for processing shareholder transactions is calculated as of the close of business of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time and includes trades executed through the end of the prior business day for the Income Fund and trades executed through the end of the current business day for the Money Market Fund. Gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Income and capital gain distributions from Fidelity Central Funds, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income is accrued as earned and includes coupon interest and amortization of premium and accretion of discount on debt securities as applicable.

Expenses. Expenses directly attributable to a fund are charged to that fund. Expenses attributable to more than one fund are allocated among the respective funds on the basis of relative net assets or other appropriate methods. Expense estimates are accrued in the period to which they relate and adjustments are made when actual amounts are known.

Income Tax Information and Distributions to Shareholders. Each year, each Fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, including distributing substantially all of its taxable income and realized gains. As a result, no provision for U.S. Federal income taxes is required. During the period, the Money Market Fund incurred a corporate tax liability on undistributed long-term capital gain which is included as Miscellaneous expense on the Statement of Operations. As of November 30, 2016, each Fund did not have any unrecognized tax benefits in the financial statements; nor is each Fund aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Each Fund files a U.S. federal tax return, in addition to state and local tax returns as required. Each Fund's federal income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for a period of three fiscal years after they are filed. State and local tax returns may be subject to examination for an additional fiscal year depending on the jurisdiction.

Dividends are declared and recorded daily and paid monthly from net investment income. Distributions from realized gains, if any, are declared and recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. In addition, the Funds claimed a portion of the payment made to redeeming shareholders as a distribution for income tax purposes.

Capital accounts within the financial statements are adjusted for permanent book-tax differences. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or the results of operations. Capital accounts are not adjusted for temporary book-tax differences which will reverse in a subsequent period.

Book-tax differences are primarily due to market discount and deferred trustees compensation.

The Funds purchase municipal securities whose interest, in the opinion of the issuer, is free from federal income tax. There is no assurance that the IRS will agree with this opinion. In the event the IRS determines that the issuer does not comply with relevant tax requirements, interest payments from a security could become federally taxable, possibly retroactively to the date the security was issued.

The federal tax cost of investment securities and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) as of period end were as follows for each Fund:

 Tax cost Gross unrealized appreciation Gross unrealized depreciation Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on securities 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund $507,260,048 $17,439,465 $(10,025,545) $7,413,920 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund 1,507,933,700 – – – 

The tax-based components of distributable earnings as of period end were as follows for each Fund:

 Undistributed tax-exempt income  Undistributed long-term capital gain  Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on securities and other investments 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund $–  $4,098,089  $7,413,920 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund 34,192  –  – 

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

November 30, 2016     
 Tax-Exempt Income Ordinary Income Long-term Capital Gains Total 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund $16,713,038 $138,886 $648,134 $17,500,058 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund 1,087,328 – – 1,087,328 

November 30, 2015    
 Tax-Exempt Income Long-term Capital Gains Total 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund $18,001,825 $1,101,159 $19,102,984 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund 238,191  238,191 

Short-Term Trading (Redemption) Fees. Shares held by investors in the Income Fund less than 30 days may be subject to a redemption fee equal to .50% of the NAV of shares redeemed. All redemption fees, which reduce the proceeds of the shareholder redemption, are retained by the Fund and accounted for as an addition to paid in capital. In November 2016, the Board of Trustees approved the elimination of these redemption fees effective December 12, 2016.

Delayed Delivery Transactions and When-Issued Securities. During the period, the Funds transacted in securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. The price of the underlying securities and the date when the securities will be delivered and paid for are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. The securities purchased on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis are identified as such in each applicable Fund's Schedule of Investments. The Funds may receive compensation for interest forgone in the purchase of a delayed delivery or when-issued security. With respect to purchase commitments, each applicable Fund identifies securities as segregated in its records with a value at least equal to the amount of the commitment. Losses may arise due to changes in the value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract's terms, or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic, or other factors.

Restricted Securities. The Funds may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and expense, and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. Information regarding restricted securities is included at the end of each applicable Fund's Schedule of Investments.

4. Purchases and Sales of Investments.

Purchases and sales of securities, other than short-term securities, for the Income Fund aggregated $80,778,238 and $96,323,813, respectively.

5. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates.

Management Fee. Fidelity Management & Research Company (the investment adviser) and its affiliates provide the Funds with investment management related services for which the Funds pay a monthly management fee. The management fee is the sum of an individual fund fee rate and an annualized group fee rate. The individual fund fee rate is applied to each Fund's average net assets. The group fee rate is based upon the average net assets of all the mutual funds advised by the investment adviser, including any mutual funds previously advised by the investment adviser that are currently advised by Fidelity SelectCo, LLC, an affiliate of the investment adviser. The group fee rate decreases as assets under management increase and increases as assets under management decrease. For the reporting period, each Fund's annual management fee rate expressed as a percentage of each Fund's average net assets was as follows:

 Individual Rate Group Rate Total 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund .25% .11% .36% 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund .25% .11% .36% 

Transfer Agent Fees. Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. (FIIOC), an affiliate of the investment adviser, is the transfer, dividend disbursing and shareholder servicing agent for the Funds. FIIOC receives account fees and asset-based fees that vary according to account size and type of account. FIIOC pays for typesetting, printing and mailing of shareholder reports, except proxy statements. For the period, the transfer agent fees were equivalent to the following annual rates expressed as a percentage of average net assets:

    
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund   .07% 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund   .12% 

Accounting Fees. Fidelity Service Company, Inc. (FSC), an affiliate of the investment adviser, maintains each Fund's accounting records. The fee is based on the level of average net assets for each month.

Interfund Trades. The Funds may purchase from or sell securities to other Fidelity Funds under procedures adopted by the Board. The procedures have been designed to ensure these interfund trades are executed in accordance with Rule 17a-7 of the 1940 Act. For the Income Fund, interfund trades are included within the respective purchases and sales amounts shown in the Purchases and Sales of Investments note.

6. Committed Line of Credit.

The Income Fund participates with other funds managed by the investment adviser or an affiliate in a $4.25 billion credit facility (the "line of credit") to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes to fund shareholder redemptions or for other short-term liquidity purposes. The participating funds have agreed to pay commitment fees on their pro-rata portion of the line of credit, which are reflected in Miscellaneous expenses on the Statement of Operations, and are as follows:

Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund $1,436 

During the period, the Income Fund did not borrow on this line of credit.

7. Expense Reductions.

The investment adviser or its affiliates voluntarily agreed to waive certain fees for the Money Market Fund in order to maintain a minimum annualized yield of .01%. Such arrangements may be discontinued by the investment adviser at any time. For the period, the amount of the waiver was $3,498,800.

Through arrangements with each Fund's custodian, credits realized as a result of certain uninvested cash balances were used to reduce fund expenses.

These expense reductions are noted in the table below.

  Custody
expense
reduction
 
  
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund  $4,206   
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund
 
 8,676   

In addition, during the period the investment advisor reimbursed and/or waived a portion of operating expenses as follows:

  
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund $2,236 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund 11,088 

8. Other.

The Funds' organizational documents provide former and current trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Funds. In the normal course of business, the Funds may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Funds' maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Funds. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees of Fidelity Court Street Trust and Fidelity Court Street Trust II and the Shareholders of Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund and Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund (a fund of Fidelity Court Street Trust) and Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund (a fund of Fidelity Court Street Trust II) (the "Funds") at November 30, 2016 the results of each of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in each of their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the Funds' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at November 30, 2016 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
January 13, 2017

Trustees and Officers

The Trustees, Members of the Advisory Board (if any), and officers of the trusts and funds, as applicable, are listed below. The Board of Trustees governs each fund and is responsible for protecting the interests of shareholders. The Trustees are experienced executives who meet periodically throughout the year to oversee each fund's activities, review contractual arrangements with companies that provide services to each fund, oversee management of the risks associated with such activities and contractual arrangements, and review each fund's performance.  Each of the Trustees oversees 244 funds. 

The Trustees hold office without limit in time except that (a) any Trustee may resign; (b) any Trustee may be removed by written instrument, signed by at least two-thirds of the number of Trustees prior to such removal; (c) any Trustee who requests to be retired or who has become incapacitated by illness or injury may be retired by written instrument signed by a majority of the other Trustees; and (d) any Trustee may be removed at any special meeting of shareholders by a two-thirds vote of the outstanding voting securities of the trust.  Each Trustee who is not an interested person (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the trust and the funds is referred to herein as an Independent Trustee.  Each Independent Trustee shall retire not later than the last day of the calendar year in which his or her 75th birthday occurs.  The Independent Trustees may waive this mandatory retirement age policy with respect to individual Trustees.  Officers and Advisory Board Members hold office without limit in time, except that any officer or Advisory Board Member may resign or may be removed by a vote of a majority of the Trustees at any regular meeting or any special meeting of the Trustees. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the past five years. 

The fund’s Statement of Additional Information (SAI) includes more information about the Trustees. To request a free copy, call Fidelity at 1-800-544-8544.

Experience, Skills, Attributes, and Qualifications of the Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has adopted a statement of policy that describes the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that are necessary and desirable for potential Independent Trustee candidates (Statement of Policy). The Board believes that each Trustee satisfied at the time he or she was initially elected or appointed a Trustee, and continues to satisfy, the standards contemplated by the Statement of Policy. The Governance and Nominating Committee also engages professional search firms to help identify potential Independent Trustee candidates who have the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills consistent with the Statement of Policy. From time to time, additional criteria based on the composition and skills of the current Independent Trustees, as well as experience or skills that may be appropriate in light of future changes to board composition, business conditions, and regulatory or other developments, have also been considered by the professional search firms and the Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition, the Board takes into account the Trustees' commitment and participation in Board and committee meetings, as well as their leadership of standing and ad hoc committees throughout their tenure.

In determining that a particular Trustee was and continues to be qualified to serve as a Trustee, the Board has considered a variety of criteria, none of which, in isolation, was controlling. The Board believes that, collectively, the Trustees have balanced and diverse experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills, which allow the Board to operate effectively in governing each fund and protecting the interests of shareholders. Information about the specific experience, skills, attributes, and qualifications of each Trustee, which in each case led to the Board's conclusion that the Trustee should serve (or continue to serve) as a trustee of the funds, is provided below.

Board Structure and Oversight Function. Abigail P. Johnson is an interested person and currently serves as Chairman. The Trustees have determined that an interested Chairman is appropriate and benefits shareholders because an interested Chairman has a personal and professional stake in the quality and continuity of services provided to the funds. Independent Trustees exercise their informed business judgment to appoint an individual of their choosing to serve as Chairman, regardless of whether the Trustee happens to be independent or a member of management. The Independent Trustees have determined that they can act independently and effectively without having an Independent Trustee serve as Chairman and that a key structural component for assuring that they are in a position to do so is for the Independent Trustees to constitute a substantial majority for the Board. The Independent Trustees also regularly meet in executive session. Marie L. Knowles serves as Chairman of the Independent Trustees and as such (i) acts as a liaison between the Independent Trustees and management with respect to matters important to the Independent Trustees and (ii) with management prepares agendas for Board meetings.

Fidelity® funds are overseen by different Boards of Trustees. The funds' Board oversees Fidelity's investment-grade bond, money market, asset allocation and certain equity funds, and other Boards oversee Fidelity's high income, sector and other equity funds. The asset allocation funds may invest in Fidelity® funds that are overseen by such other Boards. The use of separate Boards, each with its own committee structure, allows the Trustees of each group of Fidelity® funds to focus on the unique issues of the funds they oversee, including common research, investment, and operational issues. On occasion, the separate Boards establish joint committees to address issues of overlapping consequences for the Fidelity® funds overseen by each Board.

The Trustees operate using a system of committees to facilitate the timely and efficient consideration of all matters of importance to the Trustees, each fund, and fund shareholders and to facilitate compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and oversight of the funds' activities and associated risks.  The Board, acting through its committees, has charged FMR and its affiliates with (i) identifying events or circumstances the occurrence of which could have demonstrably adverse effects on the funds' business and/or reputation; (ii) implementing processes and controls to lessen the possibility that such events or circumstances occur or to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur; and (iii) creating and maintaining a system designed to evaluate continuously business and market conditions in order to facilitate the identification and implementation processes described in (i) and (ii) above.  Because the day-to-day operations and activities of the funds are carried out by or through FMR, its affiliates, and other service providers, the funds' exposure to risks is mitigated but not eliminated by the processes overseen by the Trustees.  While each of the Board's committees has responsibility for overseeing different aspects of the funds' activities, oversight is exercised primarily through the Operations and Audit Committees.  In addition, an ad hoc Board committee of Independent Trustees has worked with FMR to enhance the Board's oversight of investment and financial risks, legal and regulatory risks, technology risks, and operational risks, including the development of additional risk reporting to the Board.  The Operations Committee also worked and continues to work with FMR to enhance the stress tests required under SEC regulations for money market funds.  Appropriate personnel, including but not limited to the funds' Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), FMR's internal auditor, the independent accountants, the funds' Treasurer and portfolio management personnel, make periodic reports to the Board's committees, as appropriate, including an annual review of Fidelity's risk management program for the Fidelity® funds.  The responsibilities of each standing committee, including their oversight responsibilities, are described further under "Standing Committees of the Trustees." 

Interested Trustees*:

Correspondence intended for a Trustee who is an interested person may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.

Name, Year of Birth; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+

Abigail P. Johnson (1961)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009

Trustee

Chairman of the Board of Trustees

Ms. Johnson also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Ms. Johnson serves as President (2013-present) and Chief Executive Officer (2014-present) of FMR LLC (diversified financial services company), President of Fidelity Financial Services (2012-present) and President of Personal, Workplace and Institutional Services (2005-present). Ms. Johnson is Chairman and Director of FMR Co., Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2011-present), Chairman and Director of FMR (investment adviser firm, 2011-present), and the Vice Chairman and Director (2007-present) of FMR LLC. Previously, Ms. Johnson served as President and a Director of FMR (2001-2005), a Trustee of other investment companies advised by FMR, Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (investment adviser firm), and FMR Co., Inc. (2001-2005), Senior Vice President of the Fidelity® funds (2001-2005), and managed a number of Fidelity® funds. Ms. Abigail P. Johnson and Mr. Arthur E. Johnson are not related.

Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe (1959)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Trustee

Ms. McAuliffe also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Ms. McAuliffe previously served as Co-Head of Fixed Income of Fidelity Investments Limited (now known as FIL Limited (FIL)) (diversified financial services company). Earlier roles at FIL included Director of Research for FIL’s credit and quantitative teams in London, Hong Kong and Tokyo. Ms. McAuliffe also was the Director of Research for taxable and municipal bonds at Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. Ms. McAuliffe is also a director or trustee of several not-for-profit entities.

 * Determined to be an “Interested Trustee” by virtue of, among other things, his or her affiliation with the trusts or various entities under common control with FMR. 

 + The information includes the Trustee's principal occupation during the last five years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills relevant to the Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the conclusion that the Trustee should serve as a Trustee for each fund. 

Independent Trustees:

Correspondence intended for an Independent Trustee may be sent to Fidelity Investments, P.O. Box 55235, Boston, Massachusetts 02205-5235.

Name, Year of Birth; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+

Elizabeth S. Acton (1951)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015 or 2016

Trustee

Ms. Acton also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to her retirement in April 2012, Ms. Acton was Executive Vice President, Finance (2011-2012), Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (2002-2011), and Treasurer (2004-2005) of Comerica Incorporated (financial services). Prior to joining Comerica, Ms. Acton held a variety of positions at Ford Motor Company (1983-2002), including Vice President and Treasurer (2000-2002) and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ford Motor Credit Company (1998-2000). Ms. Acton currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors and Audit and Finance Committees of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (homebuilding, 2012-present). Previously, Ms. Acton served as a Member of the Advisory Board of certain Fidelity® funds (2013-2016).

John Engler (1948)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015 or 2016

Trustee

Mr. Engler also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. He serves as president of the Business Roundtable (2011-present), and on the board of directors for Universal Forest Products (manufacturer and distributor of wood and wood-alternative products, 2003-present) and K12 Inc. (technology-based education company, 2012-present). Previously, Mr. Engler served as a Member of the Advisory Board of certain Fidelity® funds (2014-2016), a trustee of The Munder Funds (2003-2014), president and CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers (2004-2011), member of the Board of Trustees of the Annie E. Casey Foundation (2004-2015), and as governor of Michigan (1991-2003). He is a past chairman of the National Governors Association.

Albert R. Gamper, Jr. (1942)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Trustee

Mr. Gamper also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to his retirement in December 2004, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman of the Board of CIT Group Inc. (commercial finance). During his tenure with CIT Group Inc. Mr. Gamper served in numerous senior management positions, including Chairman (1987-1989; 1999-2001; 2002-2004), Chief Executive Officer (1987-2004), and President (2002-2003). Mr. Gamper currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Public Service Enterprise Group (utilities, 2000-present), and Member of the Board of Trustees of Barnabas Health Care System (1997-present). Previously, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman (2012-2015) and Vice Chairman (2011-2012) of the Independent Trustees of certain Fidelity® funds and as Chairman of the Board of Governors, Rutgers University (2004-2007).

Robert F. Gartland (1951)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010

Trustee

Mr. Gartland also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Gartland is Chairman and an investor in Gartland & Mellina Group Corp. (consulting, 2009-present). Previously, Mr. Gartland served as a partner and investor of Vietnam Partners LLC (investments and consulting, 2008-2011). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Gartland held a variety of positions at Morgan Stanley (financial services, 1979-2007) including Managing Director (1987-2007).

Arthur E. Johnson (1947)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008

Trustee

Vice Chairman of the Independent Trustees

Mr. Johnson also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Johnson serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Eaton Corporation plc (diversified power management, 2009-present) and Booz Allen Hamilton (management consulting, 2011-present). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Johnson served as Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategic Development of Lockheed Martin Corporation (defense contractor, 1999-2009). He previously served on the Board of Directors of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (1999-2008), AGL Resources, Inc. (holding company, 2002-2016), and Delta Airlines (2005-2007). Mr. Arthur E. Johnson is not related to Ms. Abigail P. Johnson.

Michael E. Kenneally (1954)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009

Trustee

Mr. Kenneally also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Kenneally served as Chairman and Global Chief Executive Officer of Credit Suisse Asset Management. Before joining Credit Suisse, he was an Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer for Bank of America Corporation. Earlier roles at Bank of America included Director of Research, Senior Portfolio Manager and Research Analyst, and Mr. Kenneally was awarded the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation in 1991.

James H. Keyes (1940)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2007

Trustee

Mr. Keyes also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Keyes serves as a member of the Board and Non-Executive Chairman of Navistar International Corporation (manufacture and sale of trucks, buses, and diesel engines, since 2002). Previously, Mr. Keyes served as a member of the Board of Pitney Bowes, Inc. (integrated mail, messaging, and document management solutions, 1998-2013). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Keyes served as Chairman (1993-2002) and Chief Executive Officer (1988-2002) of Johnson Controls (automotive, building, and energy) and as a member of the Board of LSI Logic Corporation (semiconductor technologies, 1984-2008).

Marie L. Knowles (1946)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2001

Trustee

Chairman of the Independent Trustees

Ms. Knowles also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to Ms. Knowles' retirement in June 2000, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) (diversified energy, 1996-2000). From 1993 to 1996, she was a Senior Vice President of ARCO and President of ARCO Transportation Company (pipeline and tanker operations). Ms. Knowles currently serves as a Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of McKesson Corporation (healthcare service, since 2002). Ms. Knowles is a member of the Board of the Santa Catalina Island Company (real estate, 2009-present). Ms. Knowles is a Member of the Investment Company Institute Board of Governors and a Member of the Governing Council of the Independent Directors Council (2014-present). She also serves as a member of the Advisory Board for the School of Engineering of the University of Southern California. Previously, Ms. Knowles served as a Director of Phelps Dodge Corporation (copper mining and manufacturing, 1994-2007), URS Corporation (engineering and construction, 2000-2003) and America West (airline, 1999-2002). Ms. Knowles previously served as Vice Chairman of the Independent Trustees of certain Fidelity® funds (2012-2015).

Mark A. Murray (1954)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Trustee

Mr. Murray also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Murray is Vice Chairman (2013-present) of Meijer, Inc. (regional retail chain). Previously, Mr. Murray served as Co-Chief Executive Officer (2013-2016) and President (2006-2013) of Meijer, Inc. Mr. Murray serves as a member of the Board of Directors and Nuclear Review and Public Policy and Responsibility Committees of DTE Energy Company (diversified energy company, 2009-present). Mr. Murray also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Spectrum Health (not-for-profit health system, 2015-present). Mr. Murray previously served as President of Grand Valley State University (2001-2006), Treasurer for the State of Michigan (1999-2001), Vice President of Finance and Administration for Michigan State University (1998-1999), and a member of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee and Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufacturer and distributor of wood and wood-alternative products, 2004-2016). Mr. Murray is also a director or trustee of many community and professional organizations.

 + The information includes the Trustee's principal occupation during the last five years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills relevant to the Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the conclusion that the Trustee should serve as a Trustee for each fund. 

Advisory Board Members and Officers:

Correspondence intended for an officer may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.  Officers appear below in alphabetical order. 

Name, Year of Birth; Principal Occupation

Marc R. Bryant (1966)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Secretary and Chief Legal Officer (CLO)

Mr. Bryant also serves as Secretary and CLO of other funds. Mr. Bryant serves as CLO, Secretary, and Senior Vice President of Fidelity Management & Research Company (investment adviser firm, 2015-present) and FMR Co., Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2015-present); Secretary of Fidelity SelectCo, LLC (investment adviser firm, 2015-present) and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2015-present); and CLO of Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (investment adviser firms, 2015-present) and Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (investment adviser firm, 2016-present). He is Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of FMR LLC (diversified financial services company). Previously, Mr. Bryant served as Secretary and CLO of Fidelity Rutland Square Trust II (2010-2014) and Assistant Secretary of Fidelity's Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds (2013-2015). Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Bryant served as a Senior Vice President and the Head of Global Retail Legal for AllianceBernstein L.P. (2006-2010), and as the General Counsel for ProFund Advisors LLC (2001-2006).

Jeffrey S. Christian (1961)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Christian also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other funds. Mr. Christian is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2003-present).

Jonathan Davis (1968)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Davis also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other funds, and is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Davis served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel of FMR LLC (diversified financial services company, 2003-2010).

Adrien E. Deberghes (1967)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Deberghes also serves as an officer of other funds. He serves as Executive Vice President of Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) (investment adviser firm, 2016-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2008-present). Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Deberghes was Senior Vice President of Mutual Fund Administration at State Street Corporation (2007-2008), Senior Director of Mutual Fund Administration at Investors Bank & Trust (2005-2007), and Director of Finance for Dunkin' Brands (2000-2005). Previously, Mr. Deberghes served in other fund officer roles.

Stephanie J. Dorsey (1969)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2013

President and Treasurer

Ms. Dorsey also serves as an officer of other funds. She is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2008-present) and has served in other fund officer roles. Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Ms. Dorsey served as Treasurer (2004-2008) of the JPMorgan Mutual Funds and Vice President (2004-2008) of JPMorgan Chase Bank.

Howard J. Galligan III (1966)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2014

Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Galligan also serves as Chief Financial Officer of other funds. Mr. Galligan serves as President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) (2014-present) and as a Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2008-present). Previously, Mr. Galligan served as Chief Administrative Officer of Asset Management (2011-2014) and Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President of Investment Support for Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2003-2011).

Scott C. Goebel (1968)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Vice President

Mr. Goebel serves as Vice President of other funds and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2001-present). Previously, Mr. Goebel served as Senior Vice President of Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) (investment adviser firm, 2016), Secretary of Fidelity SelectCo, LLC (investment adviser firm, 2013-2015), Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) (investment adviser firm, 2010-2015), and Fidelity Research and Analysis Company (FRAC) (investment adviser firm, 2010-2015); General Counsel, Secretary, and Senior Vice President of FMR (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015) and FMR Co., Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015); Assistant Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015) and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015); Chief Legal Officer (CLO) of Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015); Secretary and CLO of certain Fidelity® funds (2008-2015); Assistant Secretary of FIMM (2008-2010), FRAC (2008-2010), and certain funds (2007-2008); and as Vice President and Secretary of Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) (2005-2007).

Colm A. Hogan (1973)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Hogan also serves as an officer of other funds. Mr. Hogan is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2005-present). 

Timothy Huyck (1964)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Vice President of Fidelity's Money Market Funds

Mr. Huyck also serves as Vice President of other funds. Mr. Huyck serves as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity's Money Market Funds (2015-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (1990-present).

Chris Maher (1972)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2013

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Maher serves as Assistant Treasurer of other funds. Mr. Maher is Vice President of Valuation Oversight and is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Maher served as Vice President of Asset Management Compliance (2013), Vice President of the Program Management Group of FMR (investment adviser firm, 2010-2013), and Vice President of Valuation Oversight (2008-2010).

John B. McGinty, Jr. (1962)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Chief Compliance Officer

Mr. McGinty also serves as Chief Compliance Officer of other funds. Mr. McGinty is Senior Vice President of Asset Management Compliance for Fidelity Investments and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2016-present). Mr. McGinty previously served as Vice President, Senior Attorney at Eaton Vance Management (investment management firm, 2015-2016), and prior to Eaton Vance as global CCO for all firm operations and registered investment companies at GMO LLC (investment management firm, 2009-2015). Before joining GMO LLC, Mr. McGinty served as Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel for Fidelity Investments (2007-2009).

John F. Papandrea (1972)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Officer

Mr. Papandrea also serves as AML Officer of other funds. Mr. Papandrea is Vice President of FMR LLC (diversified financial services company, 2008-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2005-present).

Jason P. Pogorelec (1975)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Assistant Secretary

Mr. Pogorelec also serves as Assistant Secretary of other funds. Mr. Pogorelec serves as Vice President, Associate General Counsel (2010-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2006-present).

Nancy D. Prior (1967)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2014

Vice President

Ms. Prior also serves as Vice President of other funds. Ms. Prior serves as a Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (investment adviser firm, 2015-present), President (2016-present) and Director (2014-present) of Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) (investment adviser firm), President, Fixed Income (2014-present), Vice Chairman of FIAM LLC (investment adviser firm, 2014-present), and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2002-present). Previously, Ms. Prior served as Vice President of Fidelity's Money Market Funds (2012-2014), President, Money Market and Short Duration Bond Group of Fidelity Management & Research (FMR) (investment adviser firm, 2013-2014), President, Money Market Group of FMR (2011-2013), Managing Director of Research (2009-2011), Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel (2007-2009), and Assistant Secretary of certain Fidelity® funds (2008-2009).

Stacie M. Smith (1974)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2013

Assistant Treasurer

Ms. Smith also serves as an officer of other funds. She is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2009-present) and has served in other fund officer roles. Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Ms. Smith served as Senior Audit Manager of Ernst & Young LLP (accounting firm, 1996-2009). Previously, Ms. Smith served as Deputy Treasurer of certain Fidelity® funds (2013-2016).

Marc L. Spector (1972)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Deputy Treasurer

Mr. Spector also serves as an officer of other funds. Mr. Spector is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2016-present). Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Spector served as Director at the Siegfried Group (accounting firm, 2013-2016), and prior to Siegfried Group as audit senior manager at Deloitte & Touche (accounting firm, 2005-2013).

Renee Stagnone (1975)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Assistant Treasurer

Ms. Stagnone also serves as an officer of other funds. Ms. Stagnone is an employee of Fidelity Investments (1997-present). Previously, Ms. Stagnone served as Deputy Treasurer of certain Fidelity® funds (2013-2016).

Christine J. Thompson (1958)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Vice President of Fidelity's Bond Funds

Ms. Thompson also serves as Vice President of other funds. Ms. Thompson also serves as Chief Investment Officer of FMR's Bond Group (2010-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (1985-present). Previously, Ms. Thompson served as Vice President of Fidelity's Bond Funds (2010-2012).

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including redemption fees and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Fund and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (June 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016).

Actual Expenses

The first line of the accompanying table for each fund provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000.00 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000.00 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line for a fund under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period. A small balance maintenance fee of $12.00 that is charged once a year may apply for certain accounts with a value of less than $2,000. This fee is not included in the table below. If it was, the estimate of expenses you paid during the period would be higher, and your ending account value lower, by this amount. In addition, each Fund, as a shareholder in the underlying Fidelity Central Funds, will indirectly bear its pro-rata share of the fees and expenses incurred by the underlying Fidelity Central Funds. These fees and expenses are not included in the Fund's annualized expense ratio used to calculate the expense estimate in the table below.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The second line of the accompanying table for each fund provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on a fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. A small balance maintenance fee of $12.00 that is charged once a year may apply for certain accounts with a value of less than $2,000. This fee is not included in the table below. If it was, the estimate of expenses you paid during the period would be higher, and your ending account value lower, by this amount. In addition, each Fund, as a shareholder in the underlying Fidelity Central Funds, will indirectly bear its pro-rata share of the fees and expenses incurred by the underlying Fidelity Central Funds. These fees and expenses are not included in the Fund's annualized expense ratio used to calculate the expense estimate in the table below.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 Annualized Expense Ratio-A Beginning
Account Value
June 1, 2016 
Ending
Account Value
November 30, 2016 
Expenses Paid
During Period-B
June 1, 2016
to November 30, 2016 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund .47%    
Actual  $1,000.00 $969.30 $2.31 
Hypothetical-C  $1,000.00 $1,022.65 $2.38 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund .47%    
Actual  $1,000.00 $1,000.60 $2.35 
Hypothetical-C  $1,000.00 $1,022.65 $2.38 

 A Annualized expense ratio reflects expenses net of applicable fee waivers.

 B Expenses are equal to each Fund's annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).

 C 5% return per year before expenses


Distributions (Unaudited)

The Board of Trustees of each fund voted to pay to shareholders of record at the opening of business on record date, the following distributions per share derived from capital gains realized from sales of portfolio securities, and dividends derived from net investment income:

 Pay Date Record Date Dividends Capital Gains 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal
Income Fund 
12/28/16 12/27/16 $0.000 $0.090 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal
Money Market Fund 
12/28/16 12/27/16 $0.000 $0.000 

The funds hereby designate as capital gain dividend the amounts noted below for the taxable year ended November 30, 2016, or, if subsequently determined to be different, the net capital gain of such year.

Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund $4,145,174 
Fidelity New Jersey Municipal
Money Market Fund 
$51,139 
  

During fiscal year ended 2016, 100% of each fund's income dividends were free from federal income tax, and 3.71% and 29.74% of Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund and Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund's income dividends, respectively, were subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

The funds will notify shareholders in January 2017 of amounts for use in preparing 2016 income tax returns.

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Contracts and Management Fees

Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund / Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund

Each year, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees (together, the Board), votes on the renewal of the management contract with Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) and the sub-advisory agreements (together, the Advisory Contracts) for each fund. The Board, assisted by the advice of fund counsel and Independent Trustees' counsel, requests and considers a broad range of information relevant to the renewal of the Advisory Contracts throughout the year.

The Board meets regularly and, at each of its meetings, covers an extensive agenda of topics and materials and considers factors that are relevant to its annual consideration of the renewal of each fund's Advisory Contracts, including the services and support provided to each fund and its shareholders. The Board has established four standing committees (Committees) — Operations, Audit, Fair Valuation, and Governance and Nominating — each composed of and chaired by Independent Trustees with varying backgrounds, to which the Board has assigned specific subject matter responsibilities in order to enhance effective decision-making by the Board. The Operations Committee, of which all of the Independent Trustees are members, meets regularly throughout the year and considers, among other matters, information specifically related to the annual consideration of the renewal of each fund's Advisory Contracts. The Board, acting directly and through its Committees, requests and receives information concerning the annual consideration of the renewal of each fund's Advisory Contracts. The Board also meets as needed to consider matters specifically related to the Board's annual consideration of the renewal of the Advisory Contracts. Members of the Board may also meet with trustees of other Fidelity funds through ad hoc joint committees to discuss certain matters relevant to all of the Fidelity funds.

At its September 2016 meeting, the Board unanimously determined to renew each fund's Advisory Contracts. In reaching its determination, the Board considered all factors it believed relevant, including (i) the nature, extent, and quality of the services to be provided to each fund and its shareholders (including the investment performance of each fund); (ii) the competitiveness of each fund's management fee and total expense ratio relative to peer funds; (iii) the total costs of the services to be provided by and the profits to be realized by Fidelity from its relationships with each fund; and (iv) the extent to which, if any, economies of scale exist and would be realized as each fund grows, and whether any economies of scale are appropriately shared with fund shareholders.

In considering whether to renew the Advisory Contracts for each fund, the Board reached a determination, with the assistance of fund counsel and Independent Trustees' counsel and through the exercise of its business judgment, that the renewal of the Advisory Contracts was in the best interests of each fund and its shareholders and that the compensation payable under the Advisory Contracts was fair and reasonable. The Board's decision to renew the Advisory Contracts was not based on any single factor, but rather was based on a comprehensive consideration of all the information provided to the Board at its meetings throughout the year. The Board, in reaching its determination to renew the Advisory Contracts, was aware that shareholders of each fund have a broad range of investment choices available to them, including a wide choice among funds offered by Fidelity's competitors, and that each fund's shareholders, who have the opportunity to review and weigh the disclosure provided by the fund in its prospectus and other public disclosures, have chosen to invest in that fund, which is part of the Fidelity family of funds.

Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided.  The Board considered Fidelity's staffing as it relates to the funds, including the backgrounds of investment personnel of Fidelity, and also considered the funds' investment objectives, strategies, and related investment philosophies. The Independent Trustees also had discussions with senior management of Fidelity's investment operations and investment groups. The Board considered the structure of the investment personnel compensation program and whether this structure provides appropriate incentives to act in the best interests of each fund. Additionally, the Board considered the portfolio managers' investments, if any, in the funds that they manage.

Resources Dedicated to Investment Management and Support Services.  The Board reviewed the general qualifications and capabilities of Fidelity's investment staff, including its size, education, experience, and resources, as well as Fidelity's approach to recruiting, managing, and compensating investment personnel. The Board noted that Fidelity has continued to increase the resources devoted to non-U.S. offices, including expansion of Fidelity's global investment organization. The Board also noted that Fidelity's analysts have extensive resources, tools and capabilities that allow them to conduct sophisticated quantitative and fundamental analysis, as well as credit analysis of issuers, counterparties and guarantors. Further, the Board considered that Fidelity's investment professionals have sufficient access to global information and data so as to provide competitive investment results over time, and that those professionals also have access to sophisticated tools that permit them to assess portfolio construction and risk and performance attribution characteristics continuously, as well as to transmit new information and research conclusions rapidly around the world. Additionally, in its deliberations, the Board considered Fidelity's trading, risk management, compliance, and technology and operations capabilities and resources, which are integral parts of the investment management process.

Shareholder and Administrative Services.  The Board considered (i) the nature, extent, quality, and cost of advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by FMR, the sub-advisers (together with FMR, the Investment Advisers), and their affiliates under the Advisory Contracts and under separate agreements covering transfer agency and pricing and bookkeeping services for each fund; (ii) the nature and extent of the supervision of third party service providers, principally custodians, subcustodians, and pricing vendors; and (iii) the resources devoted to, and the record of compliance with, each fund's compliance policies and procedures.

The Board noted that the growth of fund assets over time across the complex allows Fidelity to reinvest in the development of services designed to enhance the value or convenience of the Fidelity funds as investment vehicles. These services include 24-hour access to account information and market information through telephone representatives and over the Internet, investor education materials and asset allocation tools, and the expanded availability of Fidelity Investor Centers.

Investment in a Large Fund Family.  The Board considered the benefits to shareholders of investing in a Fidelity fund, including the benefits of investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds offering a variety of investment disciplines and providing a large variety of mutual fund investor services. The Board noted that Fidelity had taken, or had made recommendations that resulted in the Fidelity funds taking, a number of actions over the previous year that benefited particular funds, including: (i) continuing to dedicate additional resources to investment research and to the support of the senior management team that oversees asset management; (ii) continuing efforts to enhance Fidelity's global research capabilities; (iii) launching new funds and making other enhancements to meet client needs; (iv) broadening eligibility requirements for certain lower-priced share classes of, and streamlining the fee structure for, certain existing equity index funds; (v) lowering expense caps for certain existing funds and classes to reduce expenses paid by shareholders; (vi) eliminating redemption fees for certain variable insurance product funds and classes; (vii) continuing to launch dedicated lower cost underlying funds to meet portfolio construction needs related to expanding underlying fund options for Fidelity funds of funds, specifically for the Freedom Fund product lines; (viii) launching a lower cost share class for use by the Freedom Index Fund product line; (ix) rationalizing product lines and gaining increased efficiencies through fund mergers and share class consolidations; (x) continuing to develop, acquire and implement systems and technology to improve services to the funds and shareholders, strengthen information security, and increase efficiency; (xi) implementing investment enhancements to further strengthen Fidelity's target date product line to increase investors' probability of success in achieving their goals; (xii) accelerating the conversion of all remaining Class B shares to Class A shares, which have a lower expense structure; and (xiii) implementing changes to Fidelity's money market fund product line in response to recent regulatory reforms.

Investment Performance (for Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund).  The Board considered whether the fund has operated in accordance with its investment objective, as well as its record of compliance with its investment restrictions and its performance history. The Board noted that there was a portfolio management change for the fund in May 2016.

The Board took into account discussions with representatives of the Investment Advisers about fund investment performance that occur at Board meetings throughout the year. In this regard the Board noted that as part of regularly scheduled fund reviews and other reports to the Board on fund performance, the Board considers annualized return information for the fund for different time periods, measured against a securities market index ("benchmark index") and a peer group of funds with similar objectives ("peer group"), if any. In its evaluation of fund investment performance at meetings throughout the year, the Board gave particular attention to information indicating underperformance of certain Fidelity funds for specific time periods and discussed with the Investment Advisers the reasons for such underperformance.

In addition to reviewing absolute and relative fund performance, the Independent Trustees periodically consider the appropriateness of fund performance metrics in evaluating the results achieved. In general, the Independent Trustees believe that fund performance should be evaluated based on gross performance (before fees and expenses but after transaction costs) compared to appropriate benchmark indices, over appropriate time periods that may include full market cycles, and on net performance (after fees and expenses) compared to peer groups, as applicable, over the same periods, taking into account relevant factors including the following: general market conditions; expectations for interest rate levels and credit conditions; issuer-specific information including credit quality; the potential for incremental return versus the fund's benchmark index weighed against the risks involved in obtaining that incremental return, including the risk of diminished or negative total returns; and fund cash flows and other factors. Depending on the circumstances, the Independent Trustees may be satisfied with a fund's performance notwithstanding that it lags its benchmark index or peer group for certain periods.

The Independent Trustees recognize that shareholders evaluate performance on a net basis over their own holding periods, for which one-, three-, and five-year periods are often used as a proxy. For this reason, the performance information reviewed by the Board also included net cumulative calendar year total return information for the fund and an appropriate benchmark index and peer group for the most recent one-, three-, and five-year periods.

Investment Performance (for  Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund). The Board considered whether the fund has operated in accordance with its investment objective, as well as its record of compliance with its investment restrictions and its performance history.

The Board took into account discussions with representatives of the Investment Advisers about fund investment performance that occur at Board meetings throughout the year. In this regard the Board noted that as part of regularly scheduled fund reviews and other reports to the Board on fund performance, the Board considers annualized return information for the fund for different time periods, measured against a peer group of funds with similar objectives ("peer group").

In addition to reviewing absolute and relative fund performance, the Independent Trustees periodically consider the appropriateness of fund performance metrics in evaluating the results achieved. In general, the Independent Trustees believe that fund performance should be evaluated based on gross performance (before fees and expenses but after transaction costs) compared to the gross performance of appropriate peer groups, over appropriate time periods that may include full market cycles, taking into account relevant factors including the following: general market conditions; expectations for interest rate levels and credit conditions; issuer-specific information including credit quality; the fund's market value NAV over time and its resilience under various stressed conditions; and fund cash flows and other factors.

The Board recognizes that in interest rate environments where many competitors waive fees to maintain a minimum yield, relative money market fund performance on a net basis (after fees and expenses) may not be particularly meaningful due to miniscule performance differences among competitor funds. Depending on the circumstances, the Independent Trustees may be satisfied with a fund's performance notwithstanding that it lags its peer group for certain periods.

The Independent Trustees recognize that shareholders evaluate performance on a net basis over their own holding periods, for which one-, three-, and five-year periods are often used as a proxy. For this reason, the performance information reviewed by the Board also included net cumulative calendar year total return information for the fund and an appropriate peer group for the most recent one-, three-, and five-year periods.

Based on its review, the Board concluded that the nature, extent, and quality of services provided to each fund under the Advisory Contracts should continue to benefit the shareholders of each fund.

Competitiveness of Management Fee and Total Expense Ratio.  The Board considered each fund's management fee and total expense ratio compared to "mapped groups" of competitive funds and classes created for the purpose of facilitating the Trustees' competitive analysis of management fees and total expenses. Fidelity creates "mapped groups" by combining similar Lipper investment objective categories that have comparable investment mandates. Combining Lipper investment objective categories aids the Board's management fee and total expense ratio comparisons by broadening the competitive group used for comparison.

Management Fee.  The Board considered two proprietary management fee comparisons for the 12-month periods shown in basis points (BP) in the charts below. The group of Lipper funds used by the Board for management fee comparisons is referred to below as the "Total Mapped Group" and, for the reasons explained above, is broader than the Lipper peer group used by the Board for performance comparisons. The Total Mapped Group comparison focuses on a fund's standing in terms of gross management fees before expense reimbursements or caps relative to the total universe of funds with comparable investment mandates, regardless of whether their management fee structures also are comparable. Funds with comparable investment mandates offer exposure to similar types of securities. Funds with comparable management fee structures have similar management fee contractual arrangements (e.g., flat rate charged for advisory services, all-inclusive fee rate, etc.). "TMG %" represents the percentage of funds in the Total Mapped Group that had management fees that were lower than a fund's. For example, a hypothetical TMG % of 20% would mean that 80% of the funds in the Total Mapped Group had higher, and 20% had lower, management fees than a fund. The funds' actual TMG %s and the number of funds in the Total Mapped Group are in the charts below. The "Asset-Size Peer Group" (ASPG) comparison focuses on a fund's standing relative to a subset of non-Fidelity funds within the Total Mapped Group that are similar in size and management fee structure. For example, if a fund is in the first quartile of the ASPG, the fund's management fee ranks in the least expensive or lowest 25% of funds in the ASPG. The ASPG represents at least 15% of the funds in the Total Mapped Group with comparable asset size and management fee structures, subject to a minimum of 50 funds (or all funds in the Total Mapped Group if fewer than 50). Additional information, such as the ASPG quartile in which a fund's management fee rate ranked, is also included in the charts and considered by the Board.

Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund


The Board noted that the fund's management fee rate ranked below the median of its Total Mapped Group and below the median of its ASPG for 2015.

Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund


The Board noted that the fund's management fee rate ranked equal to the median of its Total Mapped Group and above the median of its ASPG for 2015. The Board noted that there is a relatively small number of state-specific funds in the Lipper objective.

The Board noted that, in 2014, the ad hoc Committee on Group Fee was formed by it and the boards of other Fidelity funds to conduct an in-depth review of the "group fee" component of the management fee of funds with such management fee structures. The Committee's focus included the mechanics of the group fee, the competitive landscape of group fee structures, Fidelity funds with no group fee component and investment products not included in group fee assets. The Board also considered that, for funds subject to the group fee, FMR agreed to voluntarily waive fees over a specified period of time in amounts designed to account for assets converted from certain funds to certain collective investment trusts.

Based on its review, the Board concluded that each fund's management fee is fair and reasonable in light of the services that the fund receives and the other factors considered.

Total Expense Ratio.  In its review of each fund's total expense ratio, the Board considered the fund's management fee rate as well as other fund expenses, such as transfer agent fees, pricing and bookkeeping fees, and custodial, legal, and audit fees. The Board also noted that Fidelity may agree to waive fees and expenses from time to time, and the extent to which, if any, it has done so for the funds. As part of its review, the Board also considered the current and historical total expense ratios of each fund compared to competitive fund median expenses. Each fund is compared to those funds and classes in the Total Mapped Group (used by the Board for management fee comparisons) that have a similar sales load structure.

The Board noted that Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund's total expense ratio ranked below the competitive median for 2015 and Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund's total expense ratio ranked equal to the competitive median for 2015. The Board considered that Fidelity has been voluntarily waiving part or all of the transfer agent fees and/or management fees to maintain a minimum yield for Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund.

Fees Charged to Other Fidelity Clients.  The Board also considered Fidelity fee structures and other information with respect to clients of Fidelity, such as other funds advised or subadvised by Fidelity, pension plan clients, and other institutional clients with similar mandates. The Board noted that an ad hoc joint committee created by it and the boards of other Fidelity funds periodically (most recently in 2013) reviews and compares Fidelity's institutional investment advisory business with its business of providing services to the Fidelity funds, including the differences in services provided, fees charged, and costs incurred, as well as competition in their respective marketplaces.

Based on its review of total expense ratios and fees charged to other Fidelity clients, the Board concluded that each fund's total expense ratio was reasonable in light of the services that the fund and its shareholders receive and the other factors considered.

Costs of the Services and Profitability.  The Board considered the revenues earned and the expenses incurred by Fidelity in conducting the business of developing, marketing, distributing, managing, administering and servicing each fund and servicing each fund's shareholders. The Board also considered the level of Fidelity's profits in respect of all the Fidelity funds.

On an annual basis, Fidelity presents to the Board information about the profitability of its relationships with each fund. Fidelity calculates profitability information for each fund, as well as aggregate profitability information for groups of Fidelity funds and all Fidelity funds, using a series of detailed revenue and cost allocation methodologies which originate with the books and records of Fidelity on which Fidelity's audited financial statements are based. The Audit Committee of the Board reviews any significant changes from the prior year's methodologies.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), independent registered public accounting firm and auditor to Fidelity and certain Fidelity funds, has been engaged annually by the Board as part of the Board's assessment of Fidelity's profitability analysis. PwC's engagement includes the review and assessment of the methodologies used by Fidelity in determining the revenues and expenses attributable to Fidelity's mutual fund business, and completion of agreed-upon procedures in respect of the mathematical accuracy of the fund profitability information and its conformity to established allocation methodologies. After considering PwC's reports issued under the engagement and information provided by Fidelity, the Board concluded that while other allocation methods may also be reasonable, Fidelity's profitability methodologies are reasonable in all material respects.

The Board also reviewed Fidelity's non-fund businesses and fall-out benefits related to the mutual fund business as well as cases where Fidelity's affiliates may benefit from or be related to the funds' business.

The Board considered the costs of the services provided by and the profits realized by Fidelity in connection with the operation of each fund and was satisfied that the profitability was not excessive.

Economies of Scale.  The Board considered whether there have been economies of scale in respect of the management of the Fidelity funds, whether the Fidelity funds (including each fund) have appropriately benefited from any such economies of scale, and whether there is potential for realization of any further economies of scale. The Board considered the extent to which each fund will benefit from economies of scale as assets grow through increased services to the fund, through waivers or reimbursements, or through fee or expense ratio reductions. The Board also noted that a committee (the Economies of Scale Committee) created by it and the boards of other Fidelity funds periodically (most recently in 2013) analyzes whether Fidelity attains economies of scale in respect of the management and servicing of the Fidelity funds, whether the Fidelity funds have appropriately benefited from such economies of scale, and whether there is potential for realization of any further economies of scale.

The Board recognized that each fund's management contract incorporates a "group fee" structure, which provides for lower group fee rates as total group assets increase, and for higher group fee rates as total group assets decrease (with "group assets" defined to include fund assets under FMR's management plus the assets of sector funds previously under FMR's management). FMR calculates the group fee rates based on a tiered asset "breakpoint" schedule that varies based on asset class. The Board considered that the group fee is designed to deliver the benefits of economies of scale to fund shareholders when total Fidelity fund assets increase, even if assets of any particular fund are unchanged or have declined, because some portion of Fidelity's costs are attributable to services provided to all Fidelity funds, and all funds benefit if those costs can be allocated among more assets. The Board concluded that, given the group fee structure, fund shareholders will benefit from lower management fees as group assets increase at the fund complex level, regardless of whether Fidelity achieves any such economies of scale.

The Board concluded, taking into account the analysis of the Economies of Scale Committee, that economies of scale, if any, are being appropriately shared between fund shareholders and Fidelity.

Additional Information Requested by the Board.  In order to develop fully the factual basis for consideration of the Fidelity funds' advisory contracts, the Board requested and received additional information on certain topics, including: (i) Fidelity's fund profitability methodology, profitability trends for certain funds, and the impact of certain factors on fund profitability results; (ii) portfolio manager changes that have occurred during the past year and the amount of the investment that each portfolio manager has made in the Fidelity fund(s) that he or she manages; (iii) Fidelity's compensation structure for portfolio managers, research analysts, and other key personnel, including its effects on fund profitability, the rationale for the compensation structure, and the extent to which current market conditions have affected retention and recruitment; (iv) the arrangements with and compensation paid to certain fund sub-advisers on behalf of the Fidelity funds; (v) Fidelity's voluntary waiver of its fees to maintain minimum yields for certain money market funds and classes as well as contractual waivers in place for certain funds; (vi) the methodology with respect to competitive fund data and peer group classifications; (vii) Fidelity's transfer agent fee, expense, and service structures for different funds and classes relative to competitive trends, and the impact of the increased use of omnibus accounts; (viii) Fidelity's long-term expectations for its offerings in the workplace investing channel; (ix) new developments in the retail and institutional marketplaces; (x) the approach to considering "fall-out" benefits; and (xi) the impact of money market reform on Fidelity's money market funds, including with respect to costs and profitability. In addition, the Board considered its discussions with Fidelity throughout the year regarding enhanced information security initiatives and the funds' fair valuation policies.

Based on its evaluation of all of the conclusions noted above, and after considering all factors it believed relevant, the Board concluded that the advisory fee structures are fair and reasonable, and that each fund's Advisory Contracts should be renewed.

Proxy Voting Results

A special meeting of Fidelity® New Jersey Municipal Money Market Fund's shareholders was held on February 12, 2016. The results of votes taken among shareholders on the proposal before them are reported below. Each vote reported represents one dollar of net asset value held on the record date for the meeting.

PROPOSAL 1

To elect a Board of Trustees. 
 # of
Votes 
% of
Votes 
Elizabeth S. Acton   
Affirmative 1,486,522,730.35 95.214 
Withheld 74,726,053.46 4.786 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
John Engler   
Affirmative 1,482,823,273.95 94.977 
Withheld 78,425,509.86 5.023 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Albert R. Gamper, Jr.   
Affirmative 1,481,651,961.13 94.902 
Withheld 79,596,822.68 5.098 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Robert F. Gartland   
Affirmative 1,488,722,172.69 95.355 
Withheld 72,526,611.12 4.645 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Abigail P. Johnson   
Affirmative 1,483,995,610.86 95.052 
Withheld 77,253,172.95 4.948 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Arthur E. Johnson   
Affirmative 1,482,398,567.75 94.950 
Withheld 78,850,216.06 5.050 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Michael E. Kenneally   
Affirmative 1,488,531,341.79 95.343 
Withheld 72,717,442.02 4.657 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
James H. Keyes   
Affirmative 1,486,787,591.37 95.231 
Withheld 74,461,192.44 4.769 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Marie L. Knowles   
Affirmative 1,488,402,727.87 95.335 
Withheld 72,846,055.94 4.665 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Geoffrey A. von Kuhn   
Affirmative 1,485,917,012.24 95.175 
Withheld 75,331,771.57 4.825 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Proposal 1 reflects trust wide proposal and voting results. 





Fidelity Investments

Corporate Headquarters

245 Summer St.

Boston, MA 02210

www.fidelity.com

NJN-ANN-0117
1.539150.119


Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund



Annual Report

November 30, 2016




Fidelity Investments


Contents

Performance

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

Investment Summary

Investments

Financial Statements

Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund

Investment Summary/Performance

Investments

Financial Statements

Notes to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

Trustees and Officers

Shareholder Expense Example

Distributions

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Contracts and Management Fees

Proxy Voting Results


To view a fund's proxy voting guidelines and proxy voting record for the 12-month period ended June 30, visit http://www.fidelity.com/proxyvotingresults or visit the Securities and Exchange Commission's (SEC) web site at http://www.sec.gov.

You may also call 1-800-544-8544 to request a free copy of the proxy voting guidelines.

Standard & Poor's, S&P and S&P 500 are registered service marks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and have been licensed for use by Fidelity Distributors Corporation.

Other third-party marks appearing herein are the property of their respective owners.

All other marks appearing herein are registered or unregistered trademarks or service marks of FMR LLC or an affiliated company. © 2017 FMR LLC. All rights reserved.



This report and the financial statements contained herein are submitted for the general information of the shareholders of the Fund. This report is not authorized for distribution to prospective investors in the Fund unless preceded or accompanied by an effective prospectus.

A fund files its complete schedule of portfolio holdings with the SEC for the first and third quarters of each fiscal year on Form N-Q. Forms N-Q are available on the SEC’s web site at http://www.sec.gov. A fund's Forms N-Q may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, DC. Information regarding the operation of the SEC's Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

For a complete list of a fund's portfolio holdings, view the most recent holdings listing, semiannual report, or annual report on Fidelity's web site at http://www.fidelity.com, http://www.institutional.fidelity.com, or http://www.401k.com, as applicable.

NOT FDIC INSURED •MAY LOSE VALUE •NO BANK GUARANTEE

Neither the Fund nor Fidelity Distributors Corporation is a bank.



Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

Performance: The Bottom Line

Average annual total return reflects the change in the value of an investment, assuming reinvestment of distributions from dividend income and capital gains (the profits earned upon the sale of securities that have grown in value, if any) and assuming a constant rate of performance each year. The hypothetical investment and the average annual total returns do not reflect the deduction of taxes that a shareholder would pay on fund distributions or the redemption of fund shares. During periods of reimbursement by Fidelity, a fund’s total return will be greater than it would be had the reimbursement not occurred. How a fund did yesterday is no guarantee of how it will do tomorrow.

Average Annual Total Returns

For the periods ended November 30, 2016 Past 1 year Past 5 years Past 10 years 
Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (0.66)% 2.78% 3.69% 

$10,000 Over 10 Years

Let's say hypothetically that $10,000 was invested in Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund on November 30, 2006.

The chart shows how the value of your investment would have changed, and also shows how the Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index performed over the same period.


Period Ending Values

$14,360Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

$14,929Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index

Effective August 24, 2016, all Barclays benchmark indices were co-branded as the Bloomberg Barclays Indices for a period of five years.



Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

Management's Discussion of Fund Performance

Market Recap:  For the 12 months ending November 30, 2016, tax-exempt bond performance was modestly negative. The Bloomberg Barclays Municipal Bond Index returned -0.22% for the period. The downward trend began in September and steepened in November, the worst month for the muni market since September 2008. The U.S. presidential election negatively impacted market performance, as investors became concerned about President-elect Donald Trump’s expansionary fiscal policy ambitions, inflation and the potential for tax reform to impair tax-exempt bond valuations. Further, some theorized that changes to or repeal of the Affordable Care Act by the incoming administration and a Republican-controlled Congress may affect the prices of muni bonds issued by hospitals. At period end, concerns about unfunded pension liabilities generally are compartmentalized to certain issuers. Looking ahead, we think the U.S. Federal Reserve is likely to raise policy interest rates in December and signal for more rate hikes in 2017.

Comments from Co-Portfolio Manager Mark Sommer:  For the year, the fund returned -0.66%, outpacing, net of fees, the -1.04% return of the Bloomberg Barclays Connecticut 4+ Year Enhanced Municipal Bond Index. Despite substantial interest rate volatility, the portfolio managers continued to focus on long-term objectives by seeking to generate attractive tax-exempt income and competitive risk-adjusted returns over time. Underweighting state general obligation bonds (GOs) helped us outperform the state index. These securities lagged the state index due to investors’ deepening concerns about Connecticut’s sluggish economic growth relative to the national overall, underfunded retiree pension and health care benefits obligations, and weak revenues. The fund benefited from its larger-than-index stake in healthcare bonds, a sector that outpaced the Connecticut market. The fund’s performance against the benchmark index was also positively impacted by Bloomberg’s decision to change the pricing source for the benchmark index. Conversely, the fund’s yield curve positioning was a drag on relative performance. Our result compared with the state index was hurt by our underweighting in bonds in the 15- to 30-year range, as demand for long-term munis was robust for the full period.

The views expressed above reflect those of the portfolio manager(s) only through the end of the period as stated on the cover of this report and do not necessarily represent the views of Fidelity or any other person in the Fidelity organization. Any such views are subject to change at any time based upon market or other conditions and Fidelity disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied on as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Fidelity fund are based on numerous factors, may not be relied on as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Fidelity fund.

Note to Shareholders:  On May 2, 2016, Cormac Cullen and Kevin Ramundo joined Mark Sommer as co-managers of the funds.

Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

Investment Summary (Unaudited)

Top Five Sectors as of November 30, 2016

 % of fund's net assets % of fund's net assets 6 months ago 
General Obligations 41.2 39.5 
Health Care 19.5 16.2 
Water & Sewer 14.2 17.1 
Special Tax 10.6 11.1 
Education 8.6 7.1 

Quality Diversification (% of fund's net assets)

As of November 30, 2016 
   AAA 5.1% 
   AA,A 85.3% 
   BBB 4.9% 
   BB and Below 1.8% 
   Short-Term Investments and Net Other Assets 2.9% 


As of May 31, 2016 
   AAA 4.2% 
   AA,A 84.7% 
   BBB 5.8% 
   Not Rated 1.3% 
   Short-Term Investments and Net Other Assets 4.0% 


We have used ratings from Moody's Investors Service, Inc. Where Moody's® ratings are not available, we have used S&P® ratings. All ratings are as of the date indicated and do not reflect subsequent changes.

Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

Investments November 30, 2016

Showing Percentage of Net Assets

Municipal Bonds - 97.1%   
 Principal Amount Value 
Connecticut - 96.6%   
Bridgeport Gen. Oblig.:   
Series 2012 A: 
5% 2/15/23 3,510,000 3,940,291 
5% 2/15/24 2,490,000 2,790,095 
5% 2/15/32 5,000,000 5,523,050 
Series 2016 D:   
5% 8/15/31 (FSA Insured) 1,000,000 1,108,480 
5% 8/15/32 (FSA Insured) 3,090,000 3,406,632 
Connecticut Gen. Oblig.:   
Series 2011 D, 5% 11/1/25 5,000,000 5,588,300 
Series 2012 B, 5% 4/15/25 7,460,000 8,334,461 
Series 2012 D:   
5% 9/15/31 3,250,000 3,610,523 
5% 9/15/32 4,860,000 5,385,512 
Series 2012 G, 5% 10/15/30 4,275,000 4,767,737 
Series 2013 A:   
5% 3/1/27 11,480,000 12,874,131 
5% 10/15/27 1,000,000 1,132,430 
Series 2014 G, 5% 11/15/28 7,000,000 7,846,300 
Series 2015 B:   
5% 6/15/27 4,825,000 5,445,640 
5% 6/15/32 5,500,000 6,082,340 
Series 2015 F, 5% 11/15/31 4,000,000 4,463,800 
Series 2016 A, 5% 3/15/31 6,840,000 7,657,996 
Connecticut Health & Edl. Facilities Auth. Rev.:   
(Fairfield Univ. Proj.):   
Series 2008 N, 5% 7/1/21 3,000,000 3,158,190 
Series O, 5% 7/1/40 2,000,000 2,138,000 
(Loomis Chaffee School Proj.) Series G, 5% 7/1/38 3,000,000 3,139,530 
(Lutheran Gen. Health Care Sys. Proj.) 7.375% 7/1/19 (Escrowed to Maturity) 940,000 1,025,606 
(Sacred Heart Univ. Proj.) Series G:   
5% 7/1/17 1,000,000 1,020,670 
5% 7/1/18 1,000,000 1,052,090 
(Stamford Hosp. Proj.) Series I, 5% 7/1/30 12,640,000 13,547,671 
Series 2007:   
5.25% 7/1/19 710,000 725,641 
5.25% 7/1/19 (Pre-Refunded to 7/1/17 @ 100) 460,000 471,256 
Series 2008, 5% 7/1/34 200,000 209,524 
Series 2011 M, 5.375% 7/1/41 5,485,000 5,899,118 
Series 2013 N:   
5% 7/1/24 400,000 456,608 
5% 7/1/25 300,000 339,555 
Series 2014 E:   
5% 7/1/28 3,260,000 3,736,677 
5% 7/1/29 3,840,000 4,367,846 
Series 2016 A, 2%, tender 7/1/26 (a) 9,000,000 8,095,950 
Series 2016 CT, 5% 12/1/45 6,990,000 7,480,418 
Series 2016 K, 4% 7/1/46 7,000,000 6,528,200 
Series 2016:   
5% 7/1/27 45,000 47,294 
5% 12/1/41 4,000,000 4,313,240 
Series 2116 Q1, 5% 7/1/46 6,000,000 6,537,900 
Series A:   
5% 7/1/21 800,000 895,064 
5% 7/1/41 3,000,000 3,166,470 
Series C:   
5% 7/1/20 465,000 509,989 
5% 7/1/22 425,000 477,352 
5% 7/1/24 1,000,000 1,132,050 
Series D:   
5% 7/1/21 2,975,000 3,334,023 
5% 7/1/23 3,335,000 3,777,221 
Series E, 5% 7/1/42 5,000,000 5,330,450 
Series F:   
5% 7/1/22 1,785,000 1,988,901 
5% 7/1/45 4,890,000 5,165,405 
Series H, 5% 7/1/23 (FSA Insured) 2,290,000 2,541,969 
Series H1, 5% 7/1/41 1,250,000 1,363,300 
Series J:   
5% 11/1/24 1,390,000 1,572,785 
5% 11/1/25 1,465,000 1,656,915 
Series L:   
5% 7/1/26 1,000,000 1,138,820 
5% 7/1/27 2,000,000 2,266,380 
Series N:   
5% 7/1/20 1,250,000 1,376,375 
5% 7/1/21 610,000 682,206 
5% 7/1/21 1,940,000 2,170,530 
5% 7/1/22 2,035,000 2,274,011 
5% 7/1/23 1,500,000 1,643,370 
5% 7/1/27 1,000,000 1,118,740 
5% 7/1/28 2,250,000 2,504,385 
5.75% 7/1/33 45,000 47,858 
Connecticut Hsg. Fin. Auth. Series 2013 B2, 4% 11/15/32 3,060,000 3,204,034 
Connecticut Muni. Elec. Energy Coop. Pwr. Supply Sys. Rev.:   
Series 2012 A:   
5% 1/1/23 1,380,000 1,563,057 
5% 1/1/25 875,000 986,589 
Series 2013 A:   
5% 1/1/26 1,180,000 1,335,984 
5% 1/1/28 1,000,000 1,123,830 
Connecticut Spl. Tax Oblig. Trans. Infrastructure Rev.:   
Series 2011 A, 5% 12/1/25 5,000,000 5,665,650 
Series 2012 A:   
5% 1/1/24 2,855,000 3,259,925 
5% 1/1/25 4,000,000 4,555,240 
5% 1/1/26 10,000,000 11,339,900 
5% 1/1/28 1,000,000 1,127,400 
5% 1/1/31 5,000,000 5,595,400 
Series 2014 B, 5% 9/1/23 5,420,000 6,211,916 
Series 2015 A, 5% 8/1/34 6,000,000 6,676,260 
Connecticut State Revolving Fund Gen. Rev. Series 2009 A, 5% 6/1/25 3,710,000 4,025,090 
Danbury Gen. Oblig. Series 2011:   
5% 7/15/22 1,000,000 1,133,860 
5% 7/15/23 1,300,000 1,469,728 
5% 7/15/24 410,000 463,337 
5% 7/15/25 350,000 395,532 
East Lyme Gen. Oblig. Series 2010:   
4% 7/15/21 360,000 388,613 
4% 7/15/22 325,000 350,714 
Greater New Haven Wtr. Poll. Cont. Auth. Reg'l. Wastewtr. Sys. Rev.:   
Series 2005 A, 5% 8/15/35 (Nat'l. Pub. Fin. Guarantee Corp. Insured) 10,000 10,028 
Series 2014 B:   
5% 8/15/25 450,000 520,106 
5% 8/15/26 700,000 805,910 
5% 8/15/27 750,000 862,350 
5% 8/15/28 1,000,000 1,143,850 
Groton Gen. Oblig. Series 2014 A:   
4% 10/1/22 410,000 445,670 
5% 10/1/23 295,000 341,383 
5% 10/1/24 335,000 390,275 
Hartford County Metropolitan District (Connecticut Clean Wtr. Proj.):   
Series 2013 A, 5% 4/1/32 5,550,000 6,204,956 
Series 2014 A:   
5% 11/1/28 1,000,000 1,148,910 
5% 11/1/29 1,850,000 2,114,236 
5% 11/1/30 2,480,000 2,817,379 
5% 11/1/31 2,905,000 3,282,766 
5% 11/1/42 11,115,000 12,273,516 
Hartford Gen. Oblig.:   
Series 2012 A:   
5% 4/1/20 (Escrowed to Maturity) 1,000,000 1,102,380 
5% 4/1/21 (FSA Insured) 2,000,000 2,175,320 
5% 4/1/22 (FSA Insured) 1,000,000 1,099,210 
Series 2013 A, 5% 4/1/27 1,645,000 1,640,953 
Series 2014 C:   
5% 8/15/23 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 3,670,000 4,069,736 
5% 8/15/24 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 1,835,000 2,037,474 
Series 2015 A:   
5% 7/1/28 (FSA Insured) 1,000,000 1,087,070 
5% 7/1/29 (FSA Insured) 1,000,000 1,080,980 
Meriden Gen. Oblig. Series 2016 A:   
4% 5/1/29 3,485,000 3,683,959 
4% 5/1/30 2,485,000 2,611,760 
Naugatuck Ctfs. of Prtn. (Naugatuck Incineration Facilities Proj.) Series 2014 A:   
5% 6/15/20 (b) 1,585,000 1,728,633 
5% 6/15/22 (b) 1,000,000 1,117,360 
Naugatuck Gen. Oblig. 5.875% 2/15/21 (AMBAC Insured) 1,100,000 1,183,402 
New Britain Gen. Oblig. Series 2015 A:   
5% 3/1/26 1,530,000 1,742,257 
5% 3/1/27 1,605,000 1,816,427 
5% 3/1/29 1,770,000 1,978,665 
5% 3/1/30 1,860,000 2,065,121 
5% 3/1/31 1,955,000 2,161,741 
New Haven Gen. Oblig.:   
Series 2012 A:   
4% 11/1/22 (FSA Insured) 2,185,000 2,303,602 
5% 11/1/17 1,500,000 1,548,810 
5% 11/1/18 2,005,000 2,131,636 
Series 2015 B:   
5% 8/15/26 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 1,250,000 1,414,463 
5% 8/15/27 (Build America Mutual Assurance Insured) 765,000 863,800 
Series 2016 A:   
5% 8/15/27 (FSA Insured) 1,375,000 1,562,633 
5% 8/15/28 (FSA Insured) 1,500,000 1,692,765 
5% 8/15/30 (FSA Insured) 1,000,000 1,116,270 
5% 8/15/34 (FSA Insured) 1,000,000 1,097,350 
5% 8/15/35 (FSA Insured) 1,000,000 1,093,950 
Series B, 5% 8/1/21 (FSA Insured) 2,225,000 2,436,175 
5% 9/1/29 (FSA Insured) 2,655,000 2,971,556 
5% 9/1/31 (FSA Insured) 1,430,000 1,586,814 
5.25% 3/1/19 650,000 692,764 
Norwalk Gen. Oblig.:   
Series 2010 B:   
5% 7/1/23 975,000 1,087,125 
5% 7/1/26 625,000 696,181 
Series 2011 A:   
4% 7/1/23 1,000,000 1,083,320 
4% 7/1/24 1,000,000 1,077,420 
Reg'l. School District #15 4% 7/1/22 1,520,000 1,632,450 
South Central Reg'l. Wtr. Auth. Wtr. Sys. Rev.:   
Eighteenth Series B:   
5.25% 8/1/31 (Nat'l. Pub. Fin. Guarantee Corp. Insured) 1,500,000 1,573,740 
5.25% 8/1/32 (Nat'l. Pub. Fin. Guarantee Corp. Insured) 1,510,000 1,583,824 
Eighth Series A, 5% 8/1/33 1,110,000 1,263,002 
Series 2013 A, 5% 8/1/43 2,000,000 2,209,860 
Series 29:   
5% 8/1/25 (FSA Insured) 500,000 573,215 
5% 8/1/26 (FSA Insured) 1,250,000 1,429,750 
Series 30 B:   
5% 8/1/30 1,150,000 1,306,239 
5% 8/1/31 2,630,000 2,975,766 
Series 32 B:   
5% 8/1/32 1,000,000 1,141,320 
5% 8/1/33 1,150,000 1,307,424 
5% 8/1/37 3,000,000 3,368,490 
5% 8/1/38 1,000,000 1,121,090 
Twenty-Seventh Series, 5% 8/1/30 4,355,000 4,903,730 
Stamford Gen. Oblig. Series 2011, 4% 7/1/23 1,045,000 1,128,746 
Stratford Gen. Oblig. Series 2014:   
5% 12/15/24 500,000 574,365 
5% 12/15/25 500,000 573,455 
Trumbull Gen. Oblig. Series 2009:   
4% 9/15/20 525,000 559,976 
4% 9/15/21 500,000 532,185 
Univ. of Connecticut Gen. Oblig. Series 2011 A, 5% 2/15/27 3,000,000 3,333,450 
Univ. of Connecticut Rev. Series 2012 A, 5% 11/15/23 2,700,000 3,128,841 
Vernon Gen. Oblig. Series 2012:   
4% 8/1/20 1,135,000 1,220,012 
4% 8/1/22 1,000,000 1,075,640 
Waterbury Series 2007, 4.5% 4/1/22 (AMBAC Insured) 3,510,000 3,885,359 
Westport Gen. Oblig.:   
Series 2009 A, 4% 2/1/22 800,000 841,032 
Series 2009, 5% 2/1/21 480,000 516,235 
TOTAL CONNECTICUT  410,214,943 
Guam - 0.5%   
Guam Int'l. Arpt. Auth. Rev. Series 2013 C, 6.375% 10/1/43 (b) 800,000 911,608 
Guam Pwr. Auth. Rev. Series 2012 A, 5% 10/1/24 (FSA Insured) 1,100,000 1,238,380 
TOTAL GUAM  2,149,988 
TOTAL MUNICIPAL BONDS   
(Cost $414,538,092)  412,364,931 
TOTAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 97.1%   
(Cost $414,538,092)  412,364,931 
NET OTHER ASSETS (LIABILITIES) - 2.9%  12,433,497 
NET ASSETS - 100%  $424,798,428 

Legend

 (a) Coupon rates for floating and adjustable rate securities reflect the rates in effect at period end.

 (b) Private activity obligations whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals.


Investment Valuation

All investments are categorized as Level 2 under the Fair Value Hierarchy. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities may not be an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For more information on valuation inputs please refer to the Investment Valuation section in the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

Other Information

The distribution of municipal securities by revenue source, as a percentage of total Net Assets, is as follows (Unaudited):

General Obligations 41.2% 
Health Care 19.5% 
Water & Sewer 14.2% 
Special Tax 10.6% 
Education 8.6% 
Others* (Individually Less Than 5%) 5.9% 
 100.0% 

* Includes net other assets

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

  November 30, 2016 
Assets   
Investment in securities, at value — See accompanying schedule:
Unaffiliated issuers (cost $414,538,092) 
 $412,364,931 
Receivable for investments sold  9,005,188 
Receivable for fund shares sold  30,996 
Interest receivable  5,621,449 
Prepaid expenses  998 
Other receivables  845 
Total assets  427,024,407 
Liabilities   
Payable to custodian bank $667,213  
Payable for fund shares redeemed 1,050,686  
Distributions payable 289,185  
Accrued management fee 132,855  
Other affiliated payables 38,228  
Other payables and accrued expenses 47,812  
Total liabilities  2,225,979 
Net Assets  $424,798,428 
Net Assets consist of:   
Paid in capital  $422,114,866 
Undistributed net investment income  71,516 
Accumulated undistributed net realized gain (loss) on investments  4,785,207 
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investments  (2,173,161) 
Net Assets, for 37,596,582 shares outstanding  $424,798,428 
Net Asset Value, offering price and redemption price per share ($424,798,428 ÷ 37,596,582 shares)  $11.30 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Statement of Operations

  Year ended November 30, 2016 
Investment Income   
Interest  $13,786,273 
Expenses   
Management fee $1,627,847  
Transfer agent fees 339,673  
Accounting fees and expenses 117,025  
Custodian fees and expenses 3,531  
Independent trustees' fees and expenses 2,062  
Registration fees 25,439  
Audit 58,888  
Legal 5,575  
Miscellaneous 1,554  
Total expenses before reductions 2,181,594  
Expense reductions (5,329) 2,176,265 
Net investment income (loss)  11,610,008 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)   
Net realized gain (loss) on:   
Investment securities:   
Unaffiliated issuers  5,153,931 
Total net realized gain (loss)  5,153,931 
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on investment securities  (19,460,928) 
Net gain (loss)  (14,306,997) 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations  $(2,696,989) 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Statement of Changes in Net Assets

 Year ended November 30, 2016 Year ended November 30, 2015 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   
Operations   
Net investment income (loss) $11,610,008 $12,626,369 
Net realized gain (loss) 5,153,931 3,106,335 
Change in net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) (19,460,928) (2,364,192) 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations (2,696,989) 13,368,512 
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income (11,626,696) (12,609,769) 
Distributions to shareholders from net realized gain (2,918,234) (2,281,667) 
Total distributions (14,544,930) (14,891,436) 
Share transactions   
Proceeds from sales of shares 52,710,530 58,797,627 
Reinvestment of distributions 10,124,672 10,467,211 
Cost of shares redeemed (63,832,255) (63,663,634) 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from share transactions (997,053) 5,601,204 
Redemption fees 358 363 
Total increase (decrease) in net assets (18,238,614) 4,078,643 
Net Assets   
Beginning of period 443,037,042 438,958,399 
End of period $424,798,428 $443,037,042 
Other Information   
Undistributed net investment income end of period $71,516 $88,203 
Shares   
Sold 4,428,074 4,994,428 
Issued in reinvestment of distributions 854,182 892,280 
Redeemed (5,398,712) (5,440,344) 
Net increase (decrease) (116,456) 446,364 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Financial Highlights — Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

Years ended November 30, 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 
Selected Per–Share Data      
Net asset value, beginning of period $11.75 $11.78 $11.39 $12.26 $11.76 
Income from Investment Operations      
Net investment income (loss)A .306 .328 .343 .343 .355 
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss) (.372) .031 .517 (.808) .579 
Total from investment operations (.066) .359 .860 (.465) .934 
Distributions from net investment income (.306) (.328) (.343) (.343) (.354) 
Distributions from net realized gain (.078) (.061) (.127) (.063) (.080) 
Total distributions (.384) (.389) (.470) (.406) (.434) 
Redemption fees added to paid in capitalA B B B .001 B 
Net asset value, end of period $11.30 $11.75 $11.78 $11.39 $12.26 
Total ReturnC (.66)% 3.10% 7.73% (3.82)% 8.08% 
Ratios to Average Net AssetsD      
Expenses before reductions .48% .48% .49% .48% .48% 
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any .48% .48% .49% .48% .48% 
Expenses net of all reductions .48% .48% .49% .48% .48% 
Net investment income (loss) 2.57% 2.80% 2.96% 2.92% 2.95% 
Supplemental Data      
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted) $424,798 $443,037 $438,958 $445,758 $605,232 
Portfolio turnover rate 20% 13% 13% 14% 14% 

 A Calculated based on average shares outstanding during the period.

 B Amount represents less than $.0005 per share.

 C Total returns would have been lower if certain expenses had not been reduced during the applicable periods shown.

 D Expense ratios reflect operating expenses of the Fund. Expenses before reductions do not reflect amounts reimbursed by the investment adviser or reductions from expense offset arrangements and do not represent the amount paid by the Fund during periods when reimbursements or reductions occur. Expenses net of fee waivers reflect expenses after reimbursement by the investment adviser but prior to reductions from expense offset arrangements. Expenses net of all reductions represent the net expenses paid by the Fund.


See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund

Investment Summary/Performance (Unaudited)

Effective Maturity Diversification

Days % of fund's investments 11/30/16 % of fund's investments 5/31/16 % of fund's investments 11/30/15 
1 - 7 74.4 74.1 70.8 
8 - 30 5.7 3.5 3.4 
31 - 60 2.5 5.4 3.7 
61 - 90 3.4 2.7 5.7 
91 - 180 4.0 6.4 6.2 
> 180 10.0 7.9 10.2 

Effective maturity is determined in accordance with the requirements of Rule 2a-7 under the Investment Company Act of 1940.

Asset Allocation (% of fund's net assets)

As of November 30, 2016 
   Variable Rate Demand Notes (VRDNs) 45.4% 
   Tender Option Bond 13.2% 
   Other Municipal Security 33.0% 
   Investment Companies 6.6% 
   Net Other Assets (Liabilities) 1.8% 


As of May 31, 2016 
   Variable Rate Demand Notes (VRDNs) 44.0% 
   Tender Option Bond 9.9% 
   Other Municipal Security 35.1% 
   Investment Companies 10.2% 
   Net Other Assets (Liabilities) 0.8% 


Current And Historical 7-Day Yields

 11/30/16 8/31/16 5/31/16 2/29/16 11/30/15 
Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund 0.16% 0.12% 0.01% 0.01% 0.01% 

Yield refers to the income paid by the Fund over a given period. Yields for money market funds are usually for seven-day periods, as they are here, though they are expressed as annual percentage rates. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. Yield will vary and it's possible to lose money investing in the Fund. A portion of the Fund's expenses was reimbursed and/or waived. Absent such reimbursements and/or waivers the yield for the period ending November 30, 2016, the most recent period shown in the table, would have been 0.15%.

Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund

Investments November 30, 2016

Showing Percentage of Net Assets

Variable Rate Demand Note - 45.4%   
 Principal Amount Value 
Alabama - 0.1%   
Decatur Indl. Dev. Board Exempt Facilities Rev. (Nucor Steel Decatur LLC Proj.) Series 2003 A, 0.84% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) $1,100,000 $1,100,000 
Arkansas - 0.9%   
Blytheville Indl. Dev. Rev. (Nucor Corp. Proj.) Series 2002, 0.79% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 2,600,000 2,600,000 
Osceola Solid Waste Disp. Rev. (Plum Point Energy Associates, LLC Proj.) Series 2006, 0.79% 12/7/16, LOC Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, VRDN (a)(b) 6,400,000 6,400,000 
  9,000,000 
Connecticut - 42.9%   
Connecticut Dev. Auth. Arpt. Facility Rev. (Embraer Aircraft Holding, Inc. Proj.) Series 2010 A, 0.59% 12/7/16, LOC Citibank NA, VRDN (a) 11,045,000 11,045,000 
Connecticut Dev. Auth. Wtr. Facilities Rev. (Connecticut Wtr. Co. Proj.):   
Series 2004 A, 0.73% 12/7/16, LOC RBS Citizens NA, VRDN (a)(b) 5,000,000 5,000,000 
Series 2004 B, 0.68% 12/7/16, LOC RBS Citizens NA, VRDN (a) 4,550,000 4,550,000 
Connecticut Gen. Oblig. Series 2016 C, 0.52% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Bank of America NA), VRDN (a) 16,720,000 16,720,000 
Connecticut Health & Edl. Facilities Auth. Rev.:   
(Gaylord Hosp. Proj.) Series B, 0.64% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (a) 15,490,000 15,490,000 
(Greenwich Hosp. Proj.) Series C, 0.56% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (a) 16,380,000 16,380,000 
(Griffin Hosp. Proj.) Series C, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (a) 19,675,000 19,675,000 
(Hamden Hall Country Day School Proj.) Series A, 0.61% 12/7/16, LOC RBS Citizens NA, VRDN (a) 15,700,000 15,700,000 
(Masonicare Corp. Proj.) Series C, 0.57% 12/7/16, LOC Manufacturers & Traders Trust Co., VRDN (a) 50,000,000 50,000,000 
(Sacred Heart Univ. Proj.) Series F, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (a) 17,100,000 17,100,000 
(Taft School Issue Proj.) Series E, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (a) 5,100,000 5,100,000 
(Trinity College Proj.) Series L, 0.55% 12/7/16, LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank, VRDN (a) 8,910,000 8,910,000 
(Wesleyan Univ. Proj.) Series H, 0.55% 12/7/16, VRDN (a) 20,105,000 20,105,000 
Series 2007 D, 0.64% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (a) 9,670,000 9,670,000 
Series 2011 A, 0.58% 12/7/16, LOC HSBC Bank U.S.A., NA, VRDN (a) 1,855,000 1,855,000 
Series 2011 B, 0.56% 12/7/16, LOC Bank of America NA, VRDN (a)(c) 50,000,000 50,000,000 
Series 2013 H, 0.54% 12/7/16, LOC TD Banknorth, NA, VRDN (a) 14,400,000 14,400,000 
Series 2013 O, 0.54% 12/7/16, LOC Wells Fargo Bank NA, VRDN (a) 29,000,000 29,000,000 
Series 2014 C, 0.54% 12/7/16, LOC JPMorgan Chase Bank, VRDN (a) 19,925,000 19,925,000 
Connecticut Hsg. Fin. Auth.:   
(CIL Realty, Inc. Proj.) Series 2010, 0.58% 12/7/16, LOC HSBC Bank U.S.A., NA, VRDN (a) 3,600,000 3,600,000 
(Hsg. Mtg. Fin. Prog.) Series 1989 D, 0.61% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada), VRDN (a)(b) 6,580,000 6,580,000 
Series 2008 E, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Bank of America NA), VRDN (a)(b) 20,500,000 20,500,000 
Series 2016 F, 0.57% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen), VRDN(a)(c) 1,500,000 1,500,000 
Series D 3, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ Ltd.), VRDN (a)(b) 6,935,000 6,935,000 
Series E 3, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Landesbank Hessen-Thuringen), VRDN (a) 14,000,000 14,000,000 
Connecticut Innovations, Inc. Rev. (ISO New England, Inc. Proj.) Series 2012, 0.52% 12/7/16, LOC TD Banknorth, NA, VRDN (a) 28,525,000 28,525,000 
Stamford Hsg. Auth. Multi-family Rev. 0.57% 12/7/16, LOC Fannie Mae, VRDN (a)(b) 16,120,000 16,120,000 
  428,385,000 
Delaware - 0.1%   
Delaware Econ. Dev. Auth. Rev. (Delmarva Pwr. & Lt. Co. Proj.):   
Series 1987, 0.78% 12/1/16, VRDN (a)(b) 400,000 400,000 
Series 1988, 0.78% 12/1/16, VRDN (a)(b) 600,000 600,000 
Series 1993 C, 0.74% 12/7/16, VRDN (a) 300,000 300,000 
  1,300,000 
Georgia - 0.6%   
Bartow County Dev. Auth. Rev. (VMC Specialty Alloys LLC Proj.) Series 2014, 0.68% 12/7/16, LOC Comerica Bank, VRDN (a)(b) 1,430,000 1,430,000 
Burke County Indl. Dev. Auth. Poll. Cont. Rev. (Georgia Pwr. Co. Plant Vogtle Proj.) Series 2013, 0.62% 12/7/16, VRDN (a) 2,800,000 2,800,000 
Monroe County Dev. Auth. Poll. Cont. Rev. (Georgia Pwr. Co. Plant Scherer Proj.) First Series 2009, 0.64% 12/7/16, VRDN (a) 1,700,000 1,700,000 
  5,930,000 
Indiana - 0.2%   
Indiana Dev. Fin. Auth. Envir. Rev. (PSI Energy Proj.) Series 2003 B, 0.68% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 1,700,000 1,700,000 
Kentucky - 0.2%   
Trimble County Poll. Cont. Rev. (Louisville Gas and Elec. Co. Proj.) Series 2016 A, 0.67% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 2,500,000 2,500,000 
Louisiana - 0.1%   
Saint James Parish Gen. Oblig. (Nucor Steel Louisiana LLC Proj.) Series 2010 A1, 0.79% 12/7/16, VRDN (a) 700,000 700,000 
Nebraska - 0.1%   
Stanton County Indl. Dev. Rev. (Nucor Corp. Proj.) Series 1996, 0.84% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 1,100,000 1,100,000 
Nevada - 0.1%   
Washoe County Gas Facilities Rev.:   
Series 2016 C, 0.62% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 600,000 600,000 
Series 2016 E, 0.62% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 300,000 300,000 
  900,000 
West Virginia - 0.1%   
West Virginia Econ. Dev. Auth. Solid Waste Disp. Facilities Rev. (Appalachian Pwr. Co. - Amos Proj.) Series 2008 B, 0.86% 12/7/16, VRDN (a)(b) 1,100,000 1,100,000 
TOTAL VARIABLE RATE DEMAND NOTE   
(Cost $453,715,000)  453,715,000 
Tender Option Bond - 13.2%   
California - 0.2%   
California Health Facilities Fing. Auth. Participating VRDN Series 16 XG 00 49, 0.7% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch) (a)(d) 1,900,000 1,900,000 
Connecticut - 12.9%   
Connecticut Gen. Oblig. Participating VRDN:   
Series 15 XF0222, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Toronto-Dominion Bank) (a)(d) 2,000,000 2,000,000 
Series 15 YX1002, 0.6% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Barclays Bank PLC) (a)(d) 1,590,000 1,590,000 
Series Putters 3996, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(d) 10,000,000 10,000,000 
Series Putters 5003, 0.58% 12/1/16 (Liquidity Facility J.P. Morgan Securities, LLC) (a)(d) 5,300,000 5,300,000 
Connecticut Health & Edl. Facilities Auth. Rev.:   
Bonds Series MS 06 1884, 0.95%, tender 1/12/17 (Liquidity Facility Wells Fargo & Co.) (a)(d)(e) 11,720,000 11,704,073 
Participating VRDN:   
Series 15 XF0091, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(d) 940,000 940,000 
Series 16 ZF0378, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Toronto-Dominion Bank) (a)(d) 3,750,000 3,750,000 
Series BA 15 XF0247, 0.61% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Bank of America NA) (a)(d) 4,500,000 4,500,000 
Series Floaters XM 04 49, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(d) 2,225,000 2,225,000 
Series RBC 2016 XM0133, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (a)(d) 2,225,000 2,225,000 
Series RBC 2016 ZM0134, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (a)(d) 7,910,000 7,910,000 
Series ROC II R 11854, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Citibank NA) (a)(d) 15,210,000 15,210,000 
Connecticut Spl. Tax Oblig. Participating VRDN Series Floaters 16 YX1026, 0.6% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Barclays Bank PLC) (a)(d) 4,500,000 4,500,000 
Connecticut Spl. Tax Oblig. Trans. Infrastructure Rev. Participating VRDN Series ROC II R 14073, 0.59% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Citibank NA) (a)(d) 16,000,000 15,999,984 
Connecticut St Health & Edl. Facilities Auth. Rev. Participating VRDN:   
Series ZF 04 74, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(d) 6,400,000 6,400,000 
Series ZF 04 75, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(d) 15,955,000 15,955,000 
Connecticut St Health & Facilities Auth. Rev. Participating VRDN Series ZF 04 76, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(d) 12,000,000 12,000,000 
State of Connecticut Gen. Oblig. Bonds Participating VRDN Series XM 03 39, 0.58% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility JPMorgan Chase Bank) (a)(d) 6,630,000 6,630,000 
  128,839,057 
Nebraska - 0.1%   
Omaha Pub. Pwr. District Elec. Rev. Participating VRDN Series 16 XF1053, 0.73% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch) (a)(d) 500,000 500,000 
New Jersey - 0.0%   
New Jersey St. Trans. Trust Fund Auth. Participating VRDN Series Floaters 16 XF1059, 0.74% 12/7/16 (Liquidity Facility Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch) (a)(d) 400,000 400,000 
TOTAL TENDER OPTION BOND   
(Cost $131,639,057)  131,639,057 
Other Municipal Security - 33.0%   
Connecticut - 30.8%   
Bethel Gen. Oblig. BAN 2% 2/17/17 11,780,000 11,812,778 
Brookfield Gen. Oblig. BAN Series B, 2% 11/16/17 5,000,000 5,053,221 
Connecticut Gen. Oblig. Bonds:   
Series 2005 B, 5.25% 6/1/17 3,150,000 3,219,846 
Series 2009 A, 5% 2/15/17 2,000,000 2,017,918 
Series 2011 D, 5% 11/1/17 3,000,000 3,110,638 
Series 2013 A:   
0.6% 1/1/17 (a) 27,500,000 27,500,000 
0.6% 7/1/17 (a) 10,000,000 10,000,000 
5% 10/15/17 1,130,000 1,168,240 
Series 2014 B, 0.86% 3/1/17 (a) 4,400,000 4,400,369 
Series 2014 C:   
5% 12/15/16 8,690,000 8,704,208 
5% 6/15/17 11,165,000 11,420,642 
Series 2015 A, 3% 3/15/17 250,000 251,636 
Series 2016 A, 3% 3/15/17 8,000,000 8,054,413 
Series 2016 E, 2% 10/15/17 10,700,000 10,797,080 
Connecticut Health & Edl. Facilities Auth. Rev. Bonds:   
(Ascension Health Cr. Group Proj.) Series 1998 B, 1.55%, tender 2/1/17 (a) 945,000 946,121 
Series 2007 G, 4.5% 7/1/17 (Pre-Refunded to 7/1/17 @ 100) 2,000,000 2,042,015 
Series S1:   
0.82% tender 12/12/16, CP mode 11,500,000 11,500,000 
0.82% tender 12/13/16, CP mode 11,705,000 11,705,000 
0.85% tender 12/7/16, CP mode 9,000,000 9,000,000 
0.85% tender 12/8/16, CP mode 8,900,000 8,900,000 
Series S2:   
0.65% tender 1/3/17, CP mode 2,600,000 2,600,000 
0.87% tender 12/1/16, CP mode 8,820,000 8,820,000 
0.87% tender 12/2/16, CP mode 8,820,000 8,820,000 
Connecticut Spl. Tax Oblig. Trans. Infrastructure Rev. Bonds:   
Series 2009 1:   
4.25% 2/1/17 1,100,000 1,106,831 
5% 2/1/17 3,210,000 3,233,542 
Series 2011 A, 5% 12/1/16 400,000 400,000 
Series 2012 A, 3% 1/1/17 3,000,000 3,006,122 
Connecticut State Revolving Fund Gen. Rev. Bonds Series 2011 A, 5% 1/1/17 750,000 752,784 
Danbury Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 7/20/17 10,400,000 10,471,974 
East Hampton Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2015, 2% 12/15/16 5,000,000 5,002,623 
Easton Gen. Oblig. BAN 2% 12/14/16 1,510,000 1,510,807 
Enfield Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 8/9/17 12,900,000 13,010,480 
Milford Gen. Oblig. BAN:   
Series 2016 B, 2% 11/6/17 9,050,000 9,149,495 
Series 2016, 1.75% 5/5/17 5,110,000 5,132,877 
New Hartford Bd Anticipation Nts BAN Series 2016, 2% 11/16/17 4,000,000 4,039,885 
New Milford Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 4/24/17 14,570,000 14,641,319 
North Haven Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 11/9/17 3,545,000 3,577,945 
Oxford Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 7/19/17 5,896,000 5,934,596 
Redding Gen. Oblig. BAN 2% 3/15/17 1,644,000 1,650,045 
Rocky Hill Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 1.5% 6/22/17 10,600,000 10,642,441 
South Windsor Gen. Oblig. BAN 2% 2/16/17 12,300,000 12,333,902 
Southington Gen. Oblig. BAN 2% 1/25/17 6,000,000 6,012,630 
Town of Essex Bond BAN Series 2016, 1.75% 5/17/17 4,000,000 4,018,241 
Univ. of Connecticut Gen. Oblig. Bonds:   
Series 2014, 5% 2/15/17 1,660,000 1,674,865 
Series 2016 A, 4% 3/15/17 5,300,000 5,349,642 
Windham Gen. Oblig. BAN 2% 12/7/16 9,150,000 9,152,176 
Wolcott Gen. Oblig. BAN Series 2016, 2% 10/19/17 4,460,000 4,503,671 
  308,153,018 
Georgia - 1.1%   
Main Street Natural Gas, Inc. Georgia Gas Proj. Rev. Bonds:   
Series 2010 A1, 0.66%, tender 2/1/17 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (a) 8,700,000 8,700,000 
Series 2010 A2, 0.66%, tender 2/1/17 (Liquidity Facility Royal Bank of Canada) (a) 2,400,000 2,400,000 
  11,100,000 
Kentucky - 0.1%   
Jefferson County Poll. Cont. Rev. Bonds Series 01A, 0.77% tender 12/15/16, CP mode 500,000 500,000 
Massachusetts - 0.3%   
Massachusetts Indl. Fin. Agcy. Poll. Cont. Rev. Bonds (New England Pwr. Co. Proj.):   
Series 1992:   
0.85% tender 12/16/16, CP mode 100,000 100,000 
0.85% tender 12/19/16, CP mode 600,000 600,000 
Series 1993 A, 0.8% tender 12/15/16, CP mode 1,600,000 1,600,000 
Series 93B, 0.8% tender 1/4/17, CP mode 900,000 900,000 
  3,200,000 
New Hampshire - 0.5%   
New Hampshire Bus. Fin. Auth. Poll. Cont. Rev. Bonds:   
(New England Pwr. Co. Proj.) Series 1990 B, 0.85% tender 12/8/16, CP mode 1,000,000 1,000,000 
Series 1990 A:   
0.9% tender 12/16/16, CP mode (b) 1,800,000 1,800,000 
0.9% tender 12/19/16, CP mode (b) 600,000 600,000 
Series A1:   
0.88% tender 12/21/16, CP mode (b) 200,000 200,000 
1.02% tender 12/1/16, CP mode (b) 1,600,000 1,600,000 
  5,200,000 
Virginia - 0.1%   
Halifax County Indl. Dev. Auth. Poll. Cont. Rev. Bonds Series 1992, 0.83% tender 12/16/16, CP mode (b) 1,000,000 1,000,000 
West Virginia - 0.1%   
Grant County Cmnty. Solid Waste Disp. Rev. Bonds Series 96, 0.9% tender 12/19/16, CP mode (b) 800,000 800,000 
TOTAL OTHER MUNICIPAL SECURITY   
(Cost $329,953,018)  329,953,018 
 Shares Value 
Investment Company - 6.6%   
Fidelity Municipal Cash Central Fund, 0.60% (f)(g)   
(Cost $66,033,000) 66,033,000  66,033,000 
TOTAL INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO - 98.2%   
(Cost $981,340,075)  981,340,075 
NET OTHER ASSETS (LIABILITIES) - 1.8%  18,299,477 
NET ASSETS - 100%  $999,639,552 

Security Type Abbreviations

BAN – BOND ANTICIPATION NOTE

CP – COMMERCIAL PAPER

VRDN – VARIABLE RATE DEMAND NOTE (A debt instrument that is payable upon demand, either daily, weekly or monthly)

The date shown for securities represents the date when principal payments must be paid, taking into account any call options exercised by the issuer and any permissible maturity shortening features other than interest rate resets.

Legend

 (a) Coupon rates for floating and adjustable rate securities reflect the rates in effect at period end.

 (b) Private activity obligations whose interest is subject to the federal alternative minimum tax for individuals.

 (c) A portion of the security sold on a delayed delivery basis.

 (d) Provides evidence of ownership in one or more underlying municipal bonds.

 (e) Restricted securities - Investment in securities not registered under the Securities Act of 1933 (excluding 144A issues). At the end of the period, the value of restricted securities (excluding 144A issues) amounted to $11,704,073 or 1.2% of net assets.

 (f) Information in this report regarding holdings by state and security types does not reflect the holdings of the Fidelity Municipal Cash Central Fund.

 (g) Affiliated fund that is available only to investment companies and other accounts managed by Fidelity Investments. The rate quoted is the annualized seven-day yield of the fund at period end. A complete unaudited listing of the fund's holdings as of its most recent quarter end is available upon request. In addition, each Fidelity Central Fund's financial statements, which are not covered by the Fund's Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are available on the SEC's website or upon request.


Additional information on each restricted holding is as follows:

Security Acquisition Date Cost 
Connecticut Health & Edl. Facilities Auth. Rev. Bonds Series MS 06 1884, 0.95%, tender 1/12/17 (Liquidity Facility Wells Fargo & Co.) 2/19/15 - 11/1/16 $11,704,073 

Affiliated Central Funds

Information regarding fiscal year to date income earned by the Fund from investments in Fidelity Central Funds is as follows:

Fund Income earned 
Fidelity Municipal Cash Central Fund $474,008 
Total $474,008 

Investment Valuation

All investments are categorized as Level 2 under the Fair Value Hierarchy. The inputs or methodology used for valuing securities may not be an indication of the risk associated with investing in those securities. For more information on valuation inputs please refer to the Investment Valuation section in the accompanying Notes to Financial Statements.

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund

Financial Statements

Statement of Assets and Liabilities

  November 30, 2016 
Assets   
Investment in securities, at value — See accompanying schedule:
Unaffiliated issuers (cost $915,307,075) 
$915,307,075  
Fidelity Central Funds (cost $66,033,000) 66,033,000  
Total Investments (cost $981,340,075)  $981,340,075 
Cash  4,032,243 
Receivable for investments sold   
Regular delivery  16,164,576 
Delayed delivery  4,000,000 
Receivable for fund shares sold  394,020 
Interest receivable  2,623,920 
Distributions receivable from Fidelity Central Funds  47,035 
Prepaid expenses  2,884 
Receivable from investment adviser for expense reductions  5,589 
Other receivables  2,155 
Total assets  1,008,612,497 
Liabilities   
Payable for investments purchased $7,000,903  
Payable for fund shares redeemed 1,524,198  
Distributions payable 4,066  
Accrued management fee 311,809  
Other affiliated payables 95,090  
Other payables and accrued expenses 36,879  
Total liabilities  8,972,945 
Net Assets  $999,639,552 
Net Assets consist of:   
Paid in capital  $999,730,680 
Distributions in excess of net investment income  (10,697) 
Accumulated undistributed net realized gain (loss) on investments  (80,431) 
Net Assets, for 998,840,220 shares outstanding  $999,639,552 
Net Asset Value, offering price and redemption price per share ($999,639,552 ÷ 998,840,220 shares)  $1.00 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Statement of Operations

  Year ended November 30, 2016 
Investment Income   
Interest  $4,781,584 
Income from Fidelity Central Funds  474,008 
Total income  5,255,592 
Expenses   
Management fee $5,108,483  
Transfer agent fees 1,450,458  
Accounting fees and expenses 149,579  
Custodian fees and expenses 9,977  
Independent trustees' fees and expenses 6,637  
Registration fees 31,593  
Audit 41,489  
Legal 9,444  
Miscellaneous 23,359  
Total expenses before reductions 6,831,019  
Expense reductions (2,338,460) 4,492,559 
Net investment income (loss)  763,033 
Realized and Unrealized Gain (Loss)   
Net realized gain (loss) on:   
Investment securities:   
Unaffiliated issuers (116,811)  
Capital gain distributions from Fidelity Central Funds 36,248  
Total net realized gain (loss)  (80,563) 
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations  $682,470 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Statement of Changes in Net Assets

 Year ended November 30, 2016 Year ended November 30, 2015 
Increase (Decrease) in Net Assets   
Operations   
Net investment income (loss) $763,033 $177,870 
Net realized gain (loss) (80,563) 99,730 
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations 682,470 277,600 
Distributions to shareholders from net investment income (761,927) (177,751) 
Distributions to shareholders from net realized gain (52,199) (210,992) 
Total distributions (814,126) (388,743) 
Share transactions at net asset value of $1.00 per share   
Proceeds from sales of shares 1,508,682,299 3,272,330,333 
Reinvestment of distributions 787,434 370,672 
Cost of shares redeemed (2,228,873,451) (3,305,330,193) 
Net increase (decrease) in net assets and shares resulting from share transactions (719,403,718) (32,629,188) 
Total increase (decrease) in net assets (719,535,374) (32,740,331) 
Net Assets   
Beginning of period 1,719,174,926 1,751,915,257 
End of period $999,639,552 $1,719,174,926 
Other Information   
Distributions in excess of net investment income end of period $(10,697) $(11,803) 

See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Financial Highlights — Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund

Years ended November 30, 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 
Selected Per–Share Data      
Net asset value, beginning of period $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 
Income from Investment Operations      
Net investment income (loss) .001 A A A A 
Net realized and unrealized gain (loss)A – – – – – 
Total from investment operations .001 A A A A 
Distributions from net investment income (.001) A A A A 
Distributions from net realized gain A A – – – 
Total distributions (.001) A A A A 
Net asset value, end of period $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 $1.00 
Total ReturnB .07% .02% .01% .01% .01% 
Ratios to Average Net AssetsC,D      
Expenses before reductions .48% .49% .48% .49% .49% 
Expenses net of fee waivers, if any .32% .08% .08% .13% .18% 
Expenses net of all reductions .32% .08% .08% .12% .18% 
Net investment income (loss) .05% .01% .01% .01% .01% 
Supplemental Data      
Net assets, end of period (000 omitted) $999,640 $1,719,175 $1,751,915 $1,883,058 $1,857,806 

 A Amount represents less than $.0005 per share.

 B Total returns would have been lower if certain expenses had not been reduced during the applicable periods shown.

 C Fees and expenses of any underlying Fidelity Central Funds are not included in the Fund's expense ratio. The Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of any underlying Fidelity Central Funds.

 D Expense ratios reflect operating expenses of the Fund. Expenses before reductions do not reflect amounts reimbursed or waived or reductions from expense offset arrangements and do not represent the amount paid by the Fund during periods when reimbursements, waivers or reductions occur. Expenses net of fee waivers reflect expenses after reimbursement and waivers but prior to reductions from expense offset arrangements. Expenses net of all reductions represent the net expenses paid by the Fund.


See accompanying notes which are an integral part of the financial statements.


Notes to Financial Statements

For the period ended November 30, 2016

1. Organization.

Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (the Income Fund) is a fund of Fidelity Court Street Trust. Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund (the Money Market Fund) is a fund of Fidelity Court Street Trust II. Each Trust is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act), as an open-end management investment company. Fidelity Court Street Trust and Fidelity Court Street Trust II (the Trusts) are organized as a Massachusetts business trust and a Delaware statutory trust, respectively. The Income Fund is a non-diversified fund. Each Fund is authorized to issue an unlimited number of shares. Share transactions on the Statement of Changes in Net Assets may contain exchanges between affiliated funds. Effective January 1, 2016 shares of the Money Market Fund are only available for purchase by retail shareholders. Each Fund may be affected by economic and political developments in the state of Connecticut.

2. Investments in Fidelity Central Funds.

The Funds may invest in Fidelity Central Funds, which are open-end investment companies generally available only to other investment companies and accounts managed by the investment adviser and its affiliates. The Funds' Schedules of Investments list each of the Fidelity Central Funds held as of period end, if any, as an investment of each Fund, but do not include the underlying holdings of each Fidelity Central Fund. As an Investing Fund, each Fund indirectly bears its proportionate share of the expenses of the underlying Fidelity Central Funds.

The Money Market Central Funds seek preservation of capital and current income and are managed by Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM), an affiliate of the investment adviser. Annualized expenses of the Money Market Central Funds as of their most recent shareholder report date are less than .005%.

A complete unaudited list of holdings for each Fidelity Central Fund is available upon request or at the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) website at www.sec.gov. In addition, the financial statements of the Fidelity Central Funds, which are not covered by the Funds' Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, are available on the SEC website or upon request.

3. Significant Accounting Policies.

The financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP), which require management to make certain estimates and assumptions at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Subsequent events, if any, through the date that the financial statements were issued have been evaluated in the preparation of the financial statements. The following summarizes the significant accounting policies of the Funds:

Investment Valuation. Investments are valued as of 4:00 p.m. Eastern time on the last calendar day of the period. The Board of Trustees (the Board) has delegated the day to day responsibility for the valuation of the Income Fund's investments to the Fair Value Committee (the Committee) established by the Income Fund's investment adviser. In accordance with valuation policies and procedures approved by the Board, the Income Fund attempts to obtain prices from one or more third party pricing vendors or brokers to value its investments. When current market prices, quotations or currency exchange rates are not readily available or reliable, investments will be fair valued in good faith by the Committee, in accordance with procedures adopted by the Board. Factors used in determining fair value vary by investment type and may include market or investment specific events, changes in interest rates and credit quality. The frequency with which these procedures are used cannot be predicted and they may be utilized to a significant extent. The Committee oversees the Income Fund's valuation policies and procedures and reports to the Board on the Committee's activities and fair value determinations. The Board monitors the appropriateness of the procedures used in valuing the Income Fund's investments and ratifies the fair value determinations of the Committee.

Each Fund categorizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to value its investments into a disclosure hierarchy consisting of three levels as shown below:

  • Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical investments
  • Level 2 – other significant observable inputs (including quoted prices for similar investments, interest rates, prepayment speeds, etc.)
  • Level 3 – unobservable inputs (including the Fund's own assumptions based on the best information available)

Valuation techniques used to value each Fund's investments by major category are as follows:

For the Income Fund, debt securities, including restricted securities, are valued based on evaluated prices received from third party pricing vendors or from brokers who make markets in such securities. Municipal securities are valued by pricing vendors who utilize matrix pricing which considers yield or price of bonds of comparable quality, coupon, maturity and type or by broker-supplied prices. When independent prices are unavailable or unreliable, debt securities may be valued utilizing pricing methodologies which consider similar factors that would be used by third party pricing vendors. Debt securities are generally categorized as Level 2 in the hierarchy but may be Level 3 depending on the circumstances.

For the Money Market Fund, as permitted by compliance with certain conditions under Rule 2a-7 of the 1940 Act, securities are valued at amortized cost, which approximates fair value. The amortized cost of an instrument is determined by valuing it at its original cost and thereafter amortizing any discount or premium from its face value at a constant rate until maturity. Securities held by a money market fund are generally high quality and liquid; however, they are reflected as Level 2 because the inputs used to determine fair value are not quoted prices in an active market.

For the Income Fund, changes in valuation techniques may result in transfers in or out of an assigned level within the disclosure hierarchy.

Investment Transactions and Income. For financial reporting purposes, the Funds' investment holdings and net assets value (NAV) include trades executed through the end of the last business day of the period. The NAV per share for processing shareholder transactions is calculated as of the close of business of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), normally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time and includes trades executed through the end of the prior business day for the Income Fund and trades executed through the end of the current business day for the Money Market Fund. Gains and losses on securities sold are determined on the basis of identified cost. Income and capital gain distributions from Fidelity Central Funds, if any, are recorded on the ex-dividend date. Interest income is accrued as earned and includes coupon interest and amortization of premium and accretion of discount on debt securities as applicable. Debt obligations may be placed on non-accrual status and related interest income may be reduced by ceasing current accruals and writing off interest receivables when the collection of all or a portion of interest has become doubtful based on consistently applied procedures. A debt obligation is removed from non-accrual status when the issuer resumes interest payments or when collectability of interest is reasonably assured.

Expenses. Expenses directly attributable to a fund are charged to that fund. Expenses attributable to more than one fund are allocated among the respective funds on the basis of relative net assets or other appropriate methods. Expense estimates are accrued in the period to which they relate and adjustments are made when actual amounts are known.

Income Tax Information and Distributions to Shareholders. Each year, each Fund intends to qualify as a regulated investment company under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code, including distributing substantially all of its taxable income and realized gains. As a result, no provision for U.S. Federal income taxes is required. As of November 30, 2016, each Fund did not have any unrecognized tax benefits in the financial statements; nor is each Fund aware of any tax positions for which it is reasonably possible that the total amounts of unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next twelve months. Each Fund files a U.S. federal tax return, in addition to state and local tax returns as required. Each Fund's federal income tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for a period of three fiscal years after they are filed. State and local tax returns may be subject to examination for an additional fiscal year depending on the jurisdiction.

Dividends are declared and recorded daily and paid monthly from net investment income. Distributions from realized gains, if any, are declared and recorded on the ex-dividend date. Income and capital gain distributions are determined in accordance with income tax regulations, which may differ from GAAP. In addition, the Funds claimed a portion of the payment made to redeeming shareholders as a distribution for income tax purposes.

Capital accounts within the financial statements are adjusted for permanent book-tax differences. These adjustments have no impact on net assets or the results of operations. Capital accounts are not adjusted for temporary book-tax differences which will reverse in a subsequent period.

Book-tax differences are primarily due to market discount, deferred trustees compensation and capital loss carryforwards.

The Funds purchase municipal securities whose interest, in the opinion of the issuer, is free from federal income tax. There is no assurance that the IRS will agree with this opinion. In the event the IRS determines that the issuer does not comply with relevant tax requirements, interest payments from a security could become federally taxable, possibly retroactively to the date the security was issued.

The federal tax cost of investment securities and unrealized appreciation (depreciation) as of period end were as follows for each Fund:

 Tax cost Gross unrealized appreciation Gross unrealized depreciation Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on securities 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund $414,446,610 $7,387,346 $(9,469,025) $(2,081,679) 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund 981,340,075 – – – 

The tax-based components of distributable earnings as of period end were as follows for each Fund:

 Undistributed long-term capital gain Capital loss carryforward Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation) on securities and other investments 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund $4,785,208 $- $(2,081,679) 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund – (80,431) -– 

Capital loss carryforwards are only available to offset future capital gains of the Funds to the extent provided by regulations and may be limited. Under the Regulated Investment Company Modernization Act of 2010 (the Act), the Funds are permitted to carry forward capital losses incurred in taxable years beginning after December 22, 2010 for an unlimited period and such capital losses are required to be used prior to any losses that expire. The capital loss carryforward information presented below, including any applicable limitation, is estimated as of fiscal period end and is subject to adjustment.

 No expiration    
 Short-term Long-term Total no expiration Total capital loss carryfoward 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund $(80,431) $-– $(80,431) $(80,431) 

The tax character of distributions paid was as follows:

November 30, 2016    
 Tax-Exempt Income Long-term Capital Gains Total 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund $11,626,696 $2,918,234 $14,544,930 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund 761,927 52,199 814,126 

November 30,2015    
 Tax-Exempt Income Long-term Capital Gains Total 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund $12,609,769 $2,281,667 $14,891,436 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund 177,751 210,992 388,743 

Short-Term Trading (Redemption) Fees. Shares held by investors in the Income Fund less than 30 days may be subject to a redemption fee equal to .50% of the NAV of shares redeemed. All redemption fees, which reduce the proceeds of the shareholder redemption, are retained by the Fund and accounted for as an addition to paid in capital. In November 2016, the Board of Trustees approved the elimination of these redemption fees effective December 12, 2016.

Delayed Delivery Transactions and When-Issued Securities. During the period, certain Funds transacted in securities on a delayed delivery or when-issued basis. Payment and delivery may take place after the customary settlement period for that security. The price of the underlying securities and the date when the securities will be delivered and paid for are fixed at the time the transaction is negotiated. Certain Funds may receive compensation for interest forgone in the purchase of a delayed delivery or when-issued security. With respect to purchase commitments, each applicable Fund identifies securities as segregated in its records with a value at least equal to the amount of the commitment. Losses may arise due to changes in the value of the underlying securities or if the counterparty does not perform under the contract's terms, or if the issuer does not issue the securities due to political, economic, or other factors.

Restricted Securities. The Funds may invest in securities that are subject to legal or contractual restrictions on resale. These securities generally may be resold in transactions exempt from registration or to the public if the securities are registered. Disposal of these securities may involve time-consuming negotiations and expense, and prompt sale at an acceptable price may be difficult. Information regarding restricted securities is included at the end of each applicable Fund's Schedule of Investments.

4. Purchases and Sales of Investments.

Purchases and sales of securities, other than short-term securities, for the Income Fund aggregated $88,848,871 and $90,539,942, respectively.

5. Fees and Other Transactions with Affiliates.

Management Fee. Fidelity Management & Research Company (the investment adviser) and its affiliates provide the Funds with investment management related services for which the Funds pay a monthly management fee. The management fee is the sum of an individual fund fee rate and an annualized group fee rate. The individual fund fee rate is applied to each Fund's average net assets. The group fee rate is based upon the average net assets of all the mutual funds advised by the investment adviser, including any mutual funds previously advised by the investment adviser that are currently advised by Fidelity SelectCo, LLC, an affiliate of the investment adviser. The group fee rate decreases as assets under management increase and increases as assets under management decrease. For the reporting period, each Fund's annual management fee rate expressed as a percentage of each Fund's average net assets was as follows:

 Individual Rate Group Rate Total 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund .25% .11% .36% 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund .25% .11% .36% 

Transfer Agent Fees. Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Company, Inc. (FIIOC), an affiliate of the investment adviser, is the transfer, dividend disbursing and shareholder servicing agent for the Funds. FIIOC receives account fees and asset-based fees that vary according to account size and type of account. FIIOC pays for typesetting, printing and mailing of shareholder reports, except proxy statements. For the period, the transfer agent fees were equivalent to the following annual rates expressed as a percentage of average net assets:

Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund .08% 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund .10% 

Accounting Fees. Fidelity Service Company, Inc. (FSC), an affiliate of the investment adviser, maintains each Fund's accounting records. The fee is based on the level of average net assets for each month.

Interfund Trades. The Funds may purchase from or sell securities to other Fidelity Funds under procedures adopted by the Board. The procedures have been designed to ensure these interfund trades are executed in accordance with Rule 17a-7 of the 1940 Act. For the Income Fund, interfund trades are included within the respective purchases and sales amounts shown in the Purchases and Sales of Investments note. For the Income Fund, interfund trades are included within the respective purchases and sales amounts shown in the Purchases and Sales of Investments note.

6. Committed Line of Credit.

The Income Fund participates with other funds managed by the investment adviser or an affiliate in a $4.25 billion credit facility (the "line of credit") to be utilized for temporary or emergency purposes to fund shareholder redemptions or for other short-term liquidity purposes. The participating funds have agreed to pay commitment fees on their pro-rata portion of the line of credit, which are reflected in Miscellaneous expenses on the Statement of Operations, and are as follows:

Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund $1,161 

During the period, the Income Fund did not borrow on this line of credit.

7. Expense Reductions.

The investment adviser voluntarily agreed to reimburse Money Market Fund to the extent annual operating expenses exceeded certain levels of average net assets as noted in the table below. Some expenses, for example interest expense, including commitment fees, are excluded from this reimbursement.

The Money Market Fund was in reimbursement during the period:

 Expense Limitations Reimbursement 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund .48% $23,885 

Additionally, the investment adviser or its affiliates voluntarily agreed to waive certain fees for the Money Market Fund in order to maintain a minimum annualized yield of .01%. Such arrangements may be discontinued by the investment adviser at any time. For the period, the amount of the waiver was $2,296,798.

In addition, through arrangements with each applicable Fund's custodian, credits realized as a result of certain uninvested cash balances were used to reduce each applicable Fund's expenses. All of the applicable expense reductions are noted in the table below.

 Custody
expense
reduction 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund $3,531 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund 9,977 

In addition, during the period the investment adviser reimbursed and/or waived a portion of operating expenses as follows:

 Amount 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund $1,798 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund 7,800 

8. Other.

The Funds' organizational documents provide former and current trustees and officers with a limited indemnification against liabilities arising in connection with the performance of their duties to the Funds. In the normal course of business, the Funds may also enter into contracts that provide general indemnifications. The Funds' maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would be dependent on future claims that may be made against the Funds. The risk of material loss from such claims is considered remote.

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Trustees of Fidelity Court Street Trust and Fidelity Court Street Trust II and the Shareholders of Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund and Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund:

In our opinion, the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities, including the schedules of investments, and the related statements of operations and of changes in net assets and the financial highlights present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (a fund of Fidelity Court Street Trust) and Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund (a fund of Fidelity Court Street Trust II) (the "Funds") at November 30, 2016, the results of each of their operations for the year then ended, the changes in each of their net assets for each of the two years in the period then ended and the financial highlights for each of the five years in the period then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These financial statements and financial highlights (hereafter referred to as “financial statements”) are the responsibility of the Funds' management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits, which included confirmation of securities at November 30, 2016 by correspondence with the custodian and brokers, provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Boston, Massachusetts
January 13, 2017

Trustees and Officers

The Trustees, Members of the Advisory Board (if any), and officers of the trusts and funds, as applicable, are listed below. The Board of Trustees governs each fund and is responsible for protecting the interests of shareholders. The Trustees are experienced executives who meet periodically throughout the year to oversee each fund's activities, review contractual arrangements with companies that provide services to each fund, oversee management of the risks associated with such activities and contractual arrangements, and review each fund's performance.  Each of the Trustees oversees 244 funds. 

The Trustees hold office without limit in time except that (a) any Trustee may resign; (b) any Trustee may be removed by written instrument, signed by at least two-thirds of the number of Trustees prior to such removal; (c) any Trustee who requests to be retired or who has become incapacitated by illness or injury may be retired by written instrument signed by a majority of the other Trustees; and (d) any Trustee may be removed at any special meeting of shareholders by a two-thirds vote of the outstanding voting securities of the trust.  Each Trustee who is not an interested person (as defined in the 1940 Act) of the trust and the funds is referred to herein as an Independent Trustee.  Each Independent Trustee shall retire not later than the last day of the calendar year in which his or her 75th birthday occurs.  The Independent Trustees may waive this mandatory retirement age policy with respect to individual Trustees.  Officers and Advisory Board Members hold office without limit in time, except that any officer or Advisory Board Member may resign or may be removed by a vote of a majority of the Trustees at any regular meeting or any special meeting of the Trustees. Except as indicated, each individual has held the office shown or other offices in the same company for the past five years. 

The fund’s Statement of Additional Information (SAI) includes more information about the Trustees. To request a free copy, call Fidelity at 1-800-544-8544.

Experience, Skills, Attributes, and Qualifications of the Trustees. The Governance and Nominating Committee has adopted a statement of policy that describes the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills that are necessary and desirable for potential Independent Trustee candidates (Statement of Policy). The Board believes that each Trustee satisfied at the time he or she was initially elected or appointed a Trustee, and continues to satisfy, the standards contemplated by the Statement of Policy. The Governance and Nominating Committee also engages professional search firms to help identify potential Independent Trustee candidates who have the experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills consistent with the Statement of Policy. From time to time, additional criteria based on the composition and skills of the current Independent Trustees, as well as experience or skills that may be appropriate in light of future changes to board composition, business conditions, and regulatory or other developments, have also been considered by the professional search firms and the Governance and Nominating Committee. In addition, the Board takes into account the Trustees' commitment and participation in Board and committee meetings, as well as their leadership of standing and ad hoc committees throughout their tenure.

In determining that a particular Trustee was and continues to be qualified to serve as a Trustee, the Board has considered a variety of criteria, none of which, in isolation, was controlling. The Board believes that, collectively, the Trustees have balanced and diverse experience, qualifications, attributes, and skills, which allow the Board to operate effectively in governing each fund and protecting the interests of shareholders. Information about the specific experience, skills, attributes, and qualifications of each Trustee, which in each case led to the Board's conclusion that the Trustee should serve (or continue to serve) as a trustee of the funds, is provided below.

Board Structure and Oversight Function. Abigail P. Johnson is an interested person and currently serves as Chairman. The Trustees have determined that an interested Chairman is appropriate and benefits shareholders because an interested Chairman has a personal and professional stake in the quality and continuity of services provided to the funds. Independent Trustees exercise their informed business judgment to appoint an individual of their choosing to serve as Chairman, regardless of whether the Trustee happens to be independent or a member of management. The Independent Trustees have determined that they can act independently and effectively without having an Independent Trustee serve as Chairman and that a key structural component for assuring that they are in a position to do so is for the Independent Trustees to constitute a substantial majority for the Board. The Independent Trustees also regularly meet in executive session. Marie L. Knowles serves as Chairman of the Independent Trustees and as such (i) acts as a liaison between the Independent Trustees and management with respect to matters important to the Independent Trustees and (ii) with management prepares agendas for Board meetings.

Fidelity® funds are overseen by different Boards of Trustees. The funds' Board oversees Fidelity's investment-grade bond, money market, asset allocation and certain equity funds, and other Boards oversee Fidelity's high income, sector and other equity funds. The asset allocation funds may invest in Fidelity® funds that are overseen by such other Boards. The use of separate Boards, each with its own committee structure, allows the Trustees of each group of Fidelity® funds to focus on the unique issues of the funds they oversee, including common research, investment, and operational issues. On occasion, the separate Boards establish joint committees to address issues of overlapping consequences for the Fidelity® funds overseen by each Board.

The Trustees operate using a system of committees to facilitate the timely and efficient consideration of all matters of importance to the Trustees, each fund, and fund shareholders and to facilitate compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and oversight of the funds' activities and associated risks.  The Board, acting through its committees, has charged FMR and its affiliates with (i) identifying events or circumstances the occurrence of which could have demonstrably adverse effects on the funds' business and/or reputation; (ii) implementing processes and controls to lessen the possibility that such events or circumstances occur or to mitigate the effects of such events or circumstances if they do occur; and (iii) creating and maintaining a system designed to evaluate continuously business and market conditions in order to facilitate the identification and implementation processes described in (i) and (ii) above.  Because the day-to-day operations and activities of the funds are carried out by or through FMR, its affiliates, and other service providers, the funds' exposure to risks is mitigated but not eliminated by the processes overseen by the Trustees.  While each of the Board's committees has responsibility for overseeing different aspects of the funds' activities, oversight is exercised primarily through the Operations and Audit Committees.  In addition, an ad hoc Board committee of Independent Trustees has worked with FMR to enhance the Board's oversight of investment and financial risks, legal and regulatory risks, technology risks, and operational risks, including the development of additional risk reporting to the Board.  The Operations Committee also worked and continues to work with FMR to enhance the stress tests required under SEC regulations for money market funds.  Appropriate personnel, including but not limited to the funds' Chief Compliance Officer (CCO), FMR's internal auditor, the independent accountants, the funds' Treasurer and portfolio management personnel, make periodic reports to the Board's committees, as appropriate, including an annual review of Fidelity's risk management program for the Fidelity® funds.  The responsibilities of each standing committee, including their oversight responsibilities, are described further under "Standing Committees of the Trustees." 

Interested Trustees*:

Correspondence intended for a Trustee who is an interested person may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.

Name, Year of Birth; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+

Abigail P. Johnson (1961)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009

Trustee

Chairman of the Board of Trustees

Ms. Johnson also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Ms. Johnson serves as President (2013-present) and Chief Executive Officer (2014-present) of FMR LLC (diversified financial services company), President of Fidelity Financial Services (2012-present) and President of Personal, Workplace and Institutional Services (2005-present). Ms. Johnson is Chairman and Director of FMR Co., Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2011-present), Chairman and Director of FMR (investment adviser firm, 2011-present), and the Vice Chairman and Director (2007-present) of FMR LLC. Previously, Ms. Johnson served as President and a Director of FMR (2001-2005), a Trustee of other investment companies advised by FMR, Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (investment adviser firm), and FMR Co., Inc. (2001-2005), Senior Vice President of the Fidelity® funds (2001-2005), and managed a number of Fidelity® funds. Ms. Abigail P. Johnson and Mr. Arthur E. Johnson are not related.

Jennifer Toolin McAuliffe (1959)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Trustee

Ms. McAuliffe also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Ms. McAuliffe previously served as Co-Head of Fixed Income of Fidelity Investments Limited (now known as FIL Limited (FIL)) (diversified financial services company). Earlier roles at FIL included Director of Research for FIL’s credit and quantitative teams in London, Hong Kong and Tokyo. Ms. McAuliffe also was the Director of Research for taxable and municipal bonds at Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. Ms. McAuliffe is also a director or trustee of several not-for-profit entities.

 * Determined to be an “Interested Trustee” by virtue of, among other things, his or her affiliation with the trusts or various entities under common control with FMR. 

 + The information includes the Trustee's principal occupation during the last five years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills relevant to the Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the conclusion that the Trustee should serve as a Trustee for each fund. 

Independent Trustees:

Correspondence intended for an Independent Trustee may be sent to Fidelity Investments, P.O. Box 55235, Boston, Massachusetts 02205-5235.

Name, Year of Birth; Principal Occupations and Other Relevant Experience+

Elizabeth S. Acton (1951)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015 or 2016

Trustee

Ms. Acton also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to her retirement in April 2012, Ms. Acton was Executive Vice President, Finance (2011-2012), Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer (2002-2011), and Treasurer (2004-2005) of Comerica Incorporated (financial services). Prior to joining Comerica, Ms. Acton held a variety of positions at Ford Motor Company (1983-2002), including Vice President and Treasurer (2000-2002) and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Ford Motor Credit Company (1998-2000). Ms. Acton currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors and Audit and Finance Committees of Beazer Homes USA, Inc. (homebuilding, 2012-present). Previously, Ms. Acton served as a Member of the Advisory Board of certain Fidelity® funds (2013-2016).

John Engler (1948)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015 or 2016

Trustee

Mr. Engler also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. He serves as president of the Business Roundtable (2011-present), and on the board of directors for Universal Forest Products (manufacturer and distributor of wood and wood-alternative products, 2003-present) and K12 Inc. (technology-based education company, 2012-present). Previously, Mr. Engler served as a Member of the Advisory Board of certain Fidelity® funds (2014-2016), a trustee of The Munder Funds (2003-2014), president and CEO of the National Association of Manufacturers (2004-2011), member of the Board of Trustees of the Annie E. Casey Foundation (2004-2015), and as governor of Michigan (1991-2003). He is a past chairman of the National Governors Association.

Albert R. Gamper, Jr. (1942)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2006

Trustee

Mr. Gamper also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to his retirement in December 2004, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman of the Board of CIT Group Inc. (commercial finance). During his tenure with CIT Group Inc. Mr. Gamper served in numerous senior management positions, including Chairman (1987-1989; 1999-2001; 2002-2004), Chief Executive Officer (1987-2004), and President (2002-2003). Mr. Gamper currently serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Public Service Enterprise Group (utilities, 2000-present), and Member of the Board of Trustees of Barnabas Health Care System (1997-present). Previously, Mr. Gamper served as Chairman (2012-2015) and Vice Chairman (2011-2012) of the Independent Trustees of certain Fidelity® funds and as Chairman of the Board of Governors, Rutgers University (2004-2007).

Robert F. Gartland (1951)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010

Trustee

Mr. Gartland also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Gartland is Chairman and an investor in Gartland & Mellina Group Corp. (consulting, 2009-present). Previously, Mr. Gartland served as a partner and investor of Vietnam Partners LLC (investments and consulting, 2008-2011). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Gartland held a variety of positions at Morgan Stanley (financial services, 1979-2007) including Managing Director (1987-2007).

Arthur E. Johnson (1947)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2008

Trustee

Vice Chairman of the Independent Trustees

Mr. Johnson also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Johnson serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Eaton Corporation plc (diversified power management, 2009-present) and Booz Allen Hamilton (management consulting, 2011-present). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Johnson served as Senior Vice President of Corporate Strategic Development of Lockheed Martin Corporation (defense contractor, 1999-2009). He previously served on the Board of Directors of IKON Office Solutions, Inc. (1999-2008), AGL Resources, Inc. (holding company, 2002-2016), and Delta Airlines (2005-2007). Mr. Arthur E. Johnson is not related to Ms. Abigail P. Johnson.

Michael E. Kenneally (1954)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2009

Trustee

Mr. Kenneally also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to his retirement, Mr. Kenneally served as Chairman and Global Chief Executive Officer of Credit Suisse Asset Management. Before joining Credit Suisse, he was an Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer for Bank of America Corporation. Earlier roles at Bank of America included Director of Research, Senior Portfolio Manager and Research Analyst, and Mr. Kenneally was awarded the Chartered Financial Analyst (CFA) designation in 1991.

James H. Keyes (1940)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2007

Trustee

Mr. Keyes also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Keyes serves as a member of the Board and Non-Executive Chairman of Navistar International Corporation (manufacture and sale of trucks, buses, and diesel engines, since 2002). Previously, Mr. Keyes served as a member of the Board of Pitney Bowes, Inc. (integrated mail, messaging, and document management solutions, 1998-2013). Prior to his retirement, Mr. Keyes served as Chairman (1993-2002) and Chief Executive Officer (1988-2002) of Johnson Controls (automotive, building, and energy) and as a member of the Board of LSI Logic Corporation (semiconductor technologies, 1984-2008).

Marie L. Knowles (1946)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2001

Trustee

Chairman of the Independent Trustees

Ms. Knowles also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Prior to Ms. Knowles' retirement in June 2000, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Atlantic Richfield Company (ARCO) (diversified energy, 1996-2000). From 1993 to 1996, she was a Senior Vice President of ARCO and President of ARCO Transportation Company (pipeline and tanker operations). Ms. Knowles currently serves as a Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of McKesson Corporation (healthcare service, since 2002). Ms. Knowles is a member of the Board of the Santa Catalina Island Company (real estate, 2009-present). Ms. Knowles is a Member of the Investment Company Institute Board of Governors and a Member of the Governing Council of the Independent Directors Council (2014-present). She also serves as a member of the Advisory Board for the School of Engineering of the University of Southern California. Previously, Ms. Knowles served as a Director of Phelps Dodge Corporation (copper mining and manufacturing, 1994-2007), URS Corporation (engineering and construction, 2000-2003) and America West (airline, 1999-2002). Ms. Knowles previously served as Vice Chairman of the Independent Trustees of certain Fidelity® funds (2012-2015).

Mark A. Murray (1954)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Trustee

Mr. Murray also serves as Trustee of other Fidelity® funds. Mr. Murray is Vice Chairman (2013-present) of Meijer, Inc. (regional retail chain). Previously, Mr. Murray served as Co-Chief Executive Officer (2013-2016) and President (2006-2013) of Meijer, Inc. Mr. Murray serves as a member of the Board of Directors and Nuclear Review and Public Policy and Responsibility Committees of DTE Energy Company (diversified energy company, 2009-present). Mr. Murray also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of Spectrum Health (not-for-profit health system, 2015-present). Mr. Murray previously served as President of Grand Valley State University (2001-2006), Treasurer for the State of Michigan (1999-2001), Vice President of Finance and Administration for Michigan State University (1998-1999), and a member of the Board of Directors and Audit Committee and Chairman of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Universal Forest Products, Inc. (manufacturer and distributor of wood and wood-alternative products, 2004-2016). Mr. Murray is also a director or trustee of many community and professional organizations.

 + The information includes the Trustee's principal occupation during the last five years and other information relating to the experience, attributes, and skills relevant to the Trustee's qualifications to serve as a Trustee, which led to the conclusion that the Trustee should serve as a Trustee for each fund. 

Advisory Board Members and Officers:

Correspondence intended for an officer may be sent to Fidelity Investments, 245 Summer Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02210.  Officers appear below in alphabetical order. 

Name, Year of Birth; Principal Occupation

Marc R. Bryant (1966)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Secretary and Chief Legal Officer (CLO)

Mr. Bryant also serves as Secretary and CLO of other funds. Mr. Bryant serves as CLO, Secretary, and Senior Vice President of Fidelity Management & Research Company (investment adviser firm, 2015-present) and FMR Co., Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2015-present); Secretary of Fidelity SelectCo, LLC (investment adviser firm, 2015-present) and Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2015-present); and CLO of Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited and FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (investment adviser firms, 2015-present) and Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (investment adviser firm, 2016-present). He is Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of FMR LLC (diversified financial services company). Previously, Mr. Bryant served as Secretary and CLO of Fidelity Rutland Square Trust II (2010-2014) and Assistant Secretary of Fidelity's Fixed Income and Asset Allocation Funds (2013-2015). Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Bryant served as a Senior Vice President and the Head of Global Retail Legal for AllianceBernstein L.P. (2006-2010), and as the General Counsel for ProFund Advisors LLC (2001-2006).

Jeffrey S. Christian (1961)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Christian also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other funds. Mr. Christian is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2003-present).

Jonathan Davis (1968)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Davis also serves as Assistant Treasurer of other funds, and is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Davis served as Vice President and Associate General Counsel of FMR LLC (diversified financial services company, 2003-2010).

Adrien E. Deberghes (1967)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2010

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Deberghes also serves as an officer of other funds. He serves as Executive Vice President of Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) (investment adviser firm, 2016-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2008-present). Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Deberghes was Senior Vice President of Mutual Fund Administration at State Street Corporation (2007-2008), Senior Director of Mutual Fund Administration at Investors Bank & Trust (2005-2007), and Director of Finance for Dunkin' Brands (2000-2005). Previously, Mr. Deberghes served in other fund officer roles.

Stephanie J. Dorsey (1969)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2013

President and Treasurer

Ms. Dorsey also serves as an officer of other funds. She is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2008-present) and has served in other fund officer roles. Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Ms. Dorsey served as Treasurer (2004-2008) of the JPMorgan Mutual Funds and Vice President (2004-2008) of JPMorgan Chase Bank.

Howard J. Galligan III (1966)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2014

Chief Financial Officer

Mr. Galligan also serves as Chief Financial Officer of other funds. Mr. Galligan serves as President of Fidelity Pricing and Cash Management Services (FPCMS) (2014-present) and as a Director of Strategic Advisers, Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2008-present). Previously, Mr. Galligan served as Chief Administrative Officer of Asset Management (2011-2014) and Chief Operating Officer and Senior Vice President of Investment Support for Strategic Advisers, Inc. (2003-2011).

Scott C. Goebel (1968)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Vice President

Mr. Goebel serves as Vice President of other funds and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2001-present). Previously, Mr. Goebel served as Senior Vice President of Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) (investment adviser firm, 2016), Secretary of Fidelity SelectCo, LLC (investment adviser firm, 2013-2015), Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) (investment adviser firm, 2010-2015), and Fidelity Research and Analysis Company (FRAC) (investment adviser firm, 2010-2015); General Counsel, Secretary, and Senior Vice President of FMR (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015) and FMR Co., Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015); Assistant Secretary of Fidelity Management & Research (Japan) Limited (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015) and Fidelity Management & Research (U.K.) Inc. (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015); Chief Legal Officer (CLO) of Fidelity Management & Research (Hong Kong) Limited (investment adviser firm, 2008-2015); Secretary and CLO of certain Fidelity® funds (2008-2015); Assistant Secretary of FIMM (2008-2010), FRAC (2008-2010), and certain funds (2007-2008); and as Vice President and Secretary of Fidelity Distributors Corporation (FDC) (2005-2007).

Colm A. Hogan (1973)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Hogan also serves as an officer of other funds. Mr. Hogan is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2005-present). 

Timothy Huyck (1964)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Vice President of Fidelity's Money Market Funds

Mr. Huyck also serves as Vice President of other funds. Mr. Huyck serves as Chief Investment Officer of Fidelity's Money Market Funds (2015-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (1990-present).

Chris Maher (1972)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2013

Assistant Treasurer

Mr. Maher serves as Assistant Treasurer of other funds. Mr. Maher is Vice President of Valuation Oversight and is an employee of Fidelity Investments. Previously, Mr. Maher served as Vice President of Asset Management Compliance (2013), Vice President of the Program Management Group of FMR (investment adviser firm, 2010-2013), and Vice President of Valuation Oversight (2008-2010).

John B. McGinty, Jr. (1962)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Chief Compliance Officer

Mr. McGinty also serves as Chief Compliance Officer of other funds. Mr. McGinty is Senior Vice President of Asset Management Compliance for Fidelity Investments and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2016-present). Mr. McGinty previously served as Vice President, Senior Attorney at Eaton Vance Management (investment management firm, 2015-2016), and prior to Eaton Vance as global CCO for all firm operations and registered investment companies at GMO LLC (investment management firm, 2009-2015). Before joining GMO LLC, Mr. McGinty served as Senior Vice President, Deputy General Counsel for Fidelity Investments (2007-2009).

John F. Papandrea (1972)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Anti-Money Laundering (AML) Officer

Mr. Papandrea also serves as AML Officer of other funds. Mr. Papandrea is Vice President of FMR LLC (diversified financial services company, 2008-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2005-present).

Jason P. Pogorelec (1975)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Assistant Secretary

Mr. Pogorelec also serves as Assistant Secretary of other funds. Mr. Pogorelec serves as Vice President, Associate General Counsel (2010-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2006-present).

Nancy D. Prior (1967)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2014

Vice President

Ms. Prior also serves as Vice President of other funds. Ms. Prior serves as a Director of FMR Investment Management (UK) Limited (investment adviser firm, 2015-present), President (2016-present) and Director (2014-present) of Fidelity Investments Money Management, Inc. (FIMM) (investment adviser firm), President, Fixed Income (2014-present), Vice Chairman of FIAM LLC (investment adviser firm, 2014-present), and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2002-present). Previously, Ms. Prior served as Vice President of Fidelity's Money Market Funds (2012-2014), President, Money Market and Short Duration Bond Group of Fidelity Management & Research (FMR) (investment adviser firm, 2013-2014), President, Money Market Group of FMR (2011-2013), Managing Director of Research (2009-2011), Senior Vice President and Deputy General Counsel (2007-2009), and Assistant Secretary of certain Fidelity® funds (2008-2009).

Stacie M. Smith (1974)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2013

Assistant Treasurer

Ms. Smith also serves as an officer of other funds. She is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2009-present) and has served in other fund officer roles. Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Ms. Smith served as Senior Audit Manager of Ernst & Young LLP (accounting firm, 1996-2009). Previously, Ms. Smith served as Deputy Treasurer of certain Fidelity® funds (2013-2016).

Marc L. Spector (1972)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Deputy Treasurer

Mr. Spector also serves as an officer of other funds. Mr. Spector is an employee of Fidelity Investments (2016-present). Prior to joining Fidelity Investments, Mr. Spector served as Director at the Siegfried Group (accounting firm, 2013-2016), and prior to Siegfried Group as audit senior manager at Deloitte & Touche (accounting firm, 2005-2013).

Renee Stagnone (1975)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2016

Assistant Treasurer

Ms. Stagnone also serves as an officer of other funds. Ms. Stagnone is an employee of Fidelity Investments (1997-present). Previously, Ms. Stagnone served as Deputy Treasurer of certain Fidelity® funds (2013-2016).

Christine J. Thompson (1958)

Year of Election or Appointment: 2015

Vice President of Fidelity's Bond Funds

Ms. Thompson also serves as Vice President of other funds. Ms. Thompson also serves as Chief Investment Officer of FMR's Bond Group (2010-present) and is an employee of Fidelity Investments (1985-present). Previously, Ms. Thompson served as Vice President of Fidelity's Bond Funds (2010-2012).

Shareholder Expense Example

As a shareholder of a Fund, you incur two types of costs: (1) transaction costs, including redemption fees and (2) ongoing costs, including management fees and other Fund expenses. This Example is intended to help you understand your ongoing costs (in dollars) of investing in the Funds and to compare these costs with the ongoing costs of investing in other mutual funds.

The Example is based on an investment of $1,000 invested at the beginning of the period and held for the entire period (June 1, 2016 to November 30, 2016).

Actual Expenses

The first line of the accompanying table for each fund provides information about actual account values and actual expenses. You may use the information in this line, together with the amount you invested, to estimate the expenses that you paid over the period. Simply divide your account value by $1,000.00 (for example, an $8,600 account value divided by $1,000.00 = 8.6), then multiply the result by the number in the first line for a fund under the heading entitled "Expenses Paid During Period" to estimate the expenses you paid on your account during this period. A small balance maintenance fee of $12.00 that is charged once a year may apply for certain accounts with a value of less than $2,000. This fee is not included in the table below. If it was, the estimate of expenses you paid during the period would be higher, and your ending account value lower, by this amount. In addition, each Fund, as a shareholder in the underlying Fidelity Central Funds, will indirectly bear its pro-rata share of the fees and expenses incurred by the underlying Fidelity Central Funds. These fees and expenses are not included in the Fund's annualized expense ratio used to calculate the expense estimate in the table below.

Hypothetical Example for Comparison Purposes

The second line of the accompanying table for each fund provides information about hypothetical account values and hypothetical expenses based on a fund's actual expense ratio and an assumed rate of return of 5% per year before expenses, which is not the Fund's actual return. The hypothetical account values and expenses may not be used to estimate the actual ending account balance or expenses you paid for the period. You may use this information to compare the ongoing costs of investing in the Fund and other funds. To do so, compare this 5% hypothetical example with the 5% hypothetical examples that appear in the shareholder reports of the other funds. A small balance maintenance fee of $12.00 that is charged once a year may apply for certain accounts with a value of less than $2,000. This fee is not included in the table below. If it was, the estimate of expenses you paid during the period would be higher, and your ending account value lower, by this amount. In addition, each Fund, as a shareholder in the underlying Fidelity Central Funds, will indirectly bear its pro-rata share of the fees and expenses incurred by the underlying Fidelity Central Funds. These fees and expenses are not included in the Fund's annualized expense ratio used to calculate the expense estimate in the table below.

Please note that the expenses shown in the table are meant to highlight your ongoing costs only and do not reflect any transaction costs. Therefore, the second line of the table is useful in comparing ongoing costs only, and will not help you determine the relative total costs of owning different funds. In addition, if these transactional costs were included, your costs would have been higher.

 Annualized Expense Ratio-A Beginning
Account Value
June 1, 2016 
Ending
Account Value
November 30, 2016 
Expenses Paid
During Period-B
June 1, 2016
to November 30, 2016 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund .48%    
Actual  $1,000.00 $959.80 $2.35 
Hypothetical-C  $1,000.00 $1,022.60 $2.43 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund .47%    
Actual  $1,000.00 $1,000.60 $2.35 
Hypothetical-C  $1,000.00 $1,022.65 $2.38 

 A Annualized expense ratio reflects expenses net of applicable fee waivers.

 B Expenses are equal to each Fund's annualized expense ratio, multiplied by the average account value over the period, multiplied by 183/366 (to reflect the one-half year period).

 C 5% return per year before expenses


Distributions (Unaudited)

The Board of Trustees of each fund voted to pay to shareholders of record at the opening of business on record date, the following distributions per share derived from capital gains realized from sales of portfolio securities, and dividends derived from net investment income:

 Pay Date Record Date Dividends Capital Gains 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund 12/28/16 12/27/16 $0.000 $0.135 
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund 12/28/16 12/27/16 $0.000 $0.000 

The funds hereby designate as capital gain dividend the amounts noted below for the taxable year ended November 30, 2016, or, if subsequently determined to be different, the net capital gain of such year.

Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund $5,153,925 

During fiscal year ended 2016, 100% of each fund's income dividends were free from federal income tax, and 1.41% and 12.09% of Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund and Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund's income dividends, respectively, were subject to the federal alternative minimum tax.

The funds will notify shareholders in January 2017 of amounts for use in preparing 2016 income tax returns.

Board Approval of Investment Advisory Contracts and Management Fees

Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund / Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund

Each year, the Board of Trustees, including the Independent Trustees (together, the Board), votes on the renewal of the management contract with Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR) and the sub-advisory agreements (together, the Advisory Contracts) for each fund. The Board, assisted by the advice of fund counsel and Independent Trustees' counsel, requests and considers a broad range of information relevant to the renewal of the Advisory Contracts throughout the year.

The Board meets regularly and, at each of its meetings, covers an extensive agenda of topics and materials and considers factors that are relevant to its annual consideration of the renewal of each fund's Advisory Contracts, including the services and support provided to each fund and its shareholders. The Board has established four standing committees (Committees) — Operations, Audit, Fair Valuation, and Governance and Nominating — each composed of and chaired by Independent Trustees with varying backgrounds, to which the Board has assigned specific subject matter responsibilities in order to enhance effective decision-making by the Board. The Operations Committee, of which all of the Independent Trustees are members, meets regularly throughout the year and considers, among other matters, information specifically related to the annual consideration of the renewal of each fund's Advisory Contracts. The Board, acting directly and through its Committees, requests and receives information concerning the annual consideration of the renewal of each fund's Advisory Contracts. The Board also meets as needed to consider matters specifically related to the Board's annual consideration of the renewal of the Advisory Contracts. Members of the Board may also meet with trustees of other Fidelity funds through ad hoc joint committees to discuss certain matters relevant to all of the Fidelity funds.

At its September 2016 meeting, the Board unanimously determined to renew each fund's Advisory Contracts. In reaching its determination, the Board considered all factors it believed relevant, including (i) the nature, extent, and quality of the services to be provided to each fund and its shareholders (including the investment performance of each fund); (ii) the competitiveness of each fund's management fee and total expense ratio relative to peer funds; (iii) the total costs of the services to be provided by and the profits to be realized by Fidelity from its relationships with each fund; and (iv) the extent to which, if any, economies of scale exist and would be realized as each fund grows, and whether any economies of scale are appropriately shared with fund shareholders.

In considering whether to renew the Advisory Contracts for each fund, the Board reached a determination, with the assistance of fund counsel and Independent Trustees' counsel and through the exercise of its business judgment, that the renewal of the Advisory Contracts was in the best interests of each fund and its shareholders and that the compensation payable under the Advisory Contracts was fair and reasonable. The Board's decision to renew the Advisory Contracts was not based on any single factor, but rather was based on a comprehensive consideration of all the information provided to the Board at its meetings throughout the year. The Board, in reaching its determination to renew the Advisory Contracts, was aware that shareholders of each fund have a broad range of investment choices available to them, including a wide choice among funds offered by Fidelity's competitors, and that each fund's shareholders, who have the opportunity to review and weigh the disclosure provided by the fund in its prospectus and other public disclosures, have chosen to invest in that fund, which is part of the Fidelity family of funds.

Nature, Extent, and Quality of Services Provided.  The Board considered Fidelity's staffing as it relates to the funds, including the backgrounds of investment personnel of Fidelity, and also considered the funds' investment objectives, strategies, and related investment philosophies. The Independent Trustees also had discussions with senior management of Fidelity's investment operations and investment groups. The Board considered the structure of the investment personnel compensation program and whether this structure provides appropriate incentives to act in the best interests of each fund. Additionally, the Board considered the portfolio managers' investments, if any, in the funds that they manage.

Resources Dedicated to Investment Management and Support Services.  The Board reviewed the general qualifications and capabilities of Fidelity's investment staff, including its size, education, experience, and resources, as well as Fidelity's approach to recruiting, managing, and compensating investment personnel. The Board noted that Fidelity has continued to increase the resources devoted to non-U.S. offices, including expansion of Fidelity's global investment organization. The Board also noted that Fidelity's analysts have extensive resources, tools and capabilities that allow them to conduct sophisticated quantitative and fundamental analysis, as well as credit analysis of issuers, counterparties and guarantors. Further, the Board considered that Fidelity's investment professionals have sufficient access to global information and data so as to provide competitive investment results over time, and that those professionals also have access to sophisticated tools that permit them to assess portfolio construction and risk and performance attribution characteristics continuously, as well as to transmit new information and research conclusions rapidly around the world. Additionally, in its deliberations, the Board considered Fidelity's trading, risk management, compliance, and technology and operations capabilities and resources, which are integral parts of the investment management process.

Shareholder and Administrative Services.  The Board considered (i) the nature, extent, quality, and cost of advisory, administrative, and shareholder services performed by FMR, the sub-advisers (together with FMR, the Investment Advisers), and their affiliates under the Advisory Contracts and under separate agreements covering transfer agency and pricing and bookkeeping services for each fund; (ii) the nature and extent of the supervision of third party service providers, principally custodians, subcustodians, and pricing vendors; and (iii) the resources devoted to, and the record of compliance with, each fund's compliance policies and procedures.

The Board noted that the growth of fund assets over time across the complex allows Fidelity to reinvest in the development of services designed to enhance the value or convenience of the Fidelity funds as investment vehicles. These services include 24-hour access to account information and market information through telephone representatives and over the Internet, investor education materials and asset allocation tools, and the expanded availability of Fidelity Investor Centers.

Investment in a Large Fund Family.  The Board considered the benefits to shareholders of investing in a Fidelity fund, including the benefits of investing in a fund that is part of a large family of funds offering a variety of investment disciplines and providing a large variety of mutual fund investor services. The Board noted that Fidelity had taken, or had made recommendations that resulted in the Fidelity funds taking, a number of actions over the previous year that benefited particular funds, including: (i) continuing to dedicate additional resources to investment research and to the support of the senior management team that oversees asset management; (ii) continuing efforts to enhance Fidelity's global research capabilities; (iii) launching new funds and making other enhancements to meet client needs; (iv) broadening eligibility requirements for certain lower-priced share classes of, and streamlining the fee structure for, certain existing equity index funds; (v) lowering expense caps for certain existing funds and classes to reduce expenses paid by shareholders; (vi) eliminating redemption fees for certain variable insurance product funds and classes; (vii) continuing to launch dedicated lower cost underlying funds to meet portfolio construction needs related to expanding underlying fund options for Fidelity funds of funds, specifically for the Freedom Fund product lines; (viii) launching a lower cost share class for use by the Freedom Index Fund product line; (ix) rationalizing product lines and gaining increased efficiencies through fund mergers and share class consolidations; (x) continuing to develop, acquire and implement systems and technology to improve services to the funds and shareholders, strengthen information security, and increase efficiency; (xi) implementing investment enhancements to further strengthen Fidelity's target date product line to increase investors' probability of success in achieving their goals; (xii) accelerating the conversion of all remaining Class B shares to Class A shares, which have a lower expense structure; and (xiii) implementing changes to Fidelity's money market fund product line in response to recent regulatory reforms.

Investment Performance (for Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund).  The Board considered whether the fund has operated in accordance with its investment objective, as well as its record of compliance with its investment restrictions and its performance history. The Board noted that there was a portfolio management change for the fund in May 2016.

The Board took into account discussions with representatives of the Investment Advisers about fund investment performance that occur at Board meetings throughout the year. In this regard the Board noted that as part of regularly scheduled fund reviews and other reports to the Board on fund performance, the Board considers annualized return information for the fund for different time periods, measured against a securities market index ("benchmark index") and a peer group of funds with similar objectives ("peer group"), if any. In its evaluation of fund investment performance at meetings throughout the year, the Board gave particular attention to information indicating underperformance of certain Fidelity funds for specific time periods and discussed with the Investment Advisers the reasons for such underperformance.

In addition to reviewing absolute and relative fund performance, the Independent Trustees periodically consider the appropriateness of fund performance metrics in evaluating the results achieved. In general, the Independent Trustees believe that fund performance should be evaluated based on gross performance (before fees and expenses but after transaction costs) compared to appropriate benchmark indices, over appropriate time periods that may include full market cycles, and on net performance (after fees and expenses) compared to peer groups, as applicable, over the same periods, taking into account relevant factors including the following: general market conditions; expectations for interest rate levels and credit conditions; issuer-specific information including credit quality; the potential for incremental return versus the fund's benchmark index weighed against the risks involved in obtaining that incremental return, including the risk of diminished or negative total returns; and fund cash flows and other factors. Depending on the circumstances, the Independent Trustees may be satisfied with a fund's performance notwithstanding that it lags its benchmark index or peer group for certain periods.

The Independent Trustees recognize that shareholders evaluate performance on a net basis over their own holding periods, for which one-, three-, and five-year periods are often used as a proxy. For this reason, the performance information reviewed by the Board also included net cumulative calendar year total return information for the fund and an appropriate benchmark index and peer group for the most recent one-, three-, and five-year periods.

Investment Performance (for Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund).  The Board considered whether the fund has operated in accordance with its investment objective, as well as its record of compliance with its investment restrictions and its performance history.

The Board took into account discussions with representatives of the Investment Advisers about fund investment performance that occur at Board meetings throughout the year. In this regard the Board noted that as part of regularly scheduled fund reviews and other reports to the Board on fund performance, the Board considers annualized return information for the fund for different time periods, measured against a peer group of funds with similar objectives ("peer group").

In addition to reviewing absolute and relative fund performance, the Independent Trustees periodically consider the appropriateness of fund performance metrics in evaluating the results achieved. In general, the Independent Trustees believe that fund performance should be evaluated based on gross performance (before fees and expenses but after transaction costs) compared to the gross performance of appropriate peer groups, over appropriate time periods that may include full market cycles, taking into account relevant factors including the following: general market conditions; expectations for interest rate levels and credit conditions; issuer-specific information including credit quality; the fund's market value NAV over time and its resilience under various stressed conditions; and fund cash flows and other factors.

The Board recognizes that in interest rate environments where many competitors waive fees to maintain a minimum yield, relative money market fund performance on a net basis (after fees and expenses) may not be particularly meaningful due to miniscule performance differences among competitor funds. Depending on the circumstances, the Independent Trustees may be satisfied with a fund's performance notwithstanding that it lags its peer group for certain periods.

The Independent Trustees recognize that shareholders evaluate performance on a net basis over their own holding periods, for which one-, three-, and five-year periods are often used as a proxy. For this reason, the performance information reviewed by the Board also included net cumulative calendar year total return information for the fund and an appropriate peer group for the most recent one-, three-, and five-year periods.

Based on its review, the Board concluded that the nature, extent, and quality of services provided to each fund under the Advisory Contracts should continue to benefit the shareholders of each fund.

Competitiveness of Management Fee and Total Expense Ratio.  The Board considered each fund's management fee and total expense ratio compared to "mapped groups" of competitive funds and classes created for the purpose of facilitating the Trustees' competitive analysis of management fees and total expenses. Fidelity creates "mapped groups" by combining similar Lipper investment objective categories that have comparable investment mandates. Combining Lipper investment objective categories aids the Board's management fee and total expense ratio comparisons by broadening the competitive group used for comparison.

Management Fee.  The Board considered two proprietary management fee comparisons for the 12-month periods shown in basis points (BP) in the charts below. The group of Lipper funds used by the Board for management fee comparisons is referred to below as the "Total Mapped Group" and, for the reasons explained above, is broader than the Lipper peer group used by the Board for performance comparisons. The Total Mapped Group comparison focuses on a fund's standing in terms of gross management fees before expense reimbursements or caps relative to the total universe of funds with comparable investment mandates, regardless of whether their management fee structures also are comparable. Funds with comparable investment mandates offer exposure to similar types of securities. Funds with comparable management fee structures have similar management fee contractual arrangements (e.g., flat rate charged for advisory services, all-inclusive fee rate, etc.). "TMG %" represents the percentage of funds in the Total Mapped Group that had management fees that were lower than a fund's. For example, a hypothetical TMG % of 20% would mean that 80% of the funds in the Total Mapped Group had higher, and 20% had lower, management fees than a fund. The funds' actual TMG %s and the number of funds in the Total Mapped Group are in the charts below. The "Asset-Size Peer Group" (ASPG) comparison focuses on a fund's standing relative to a subset of non-Fidelity funds within the Total Mapped Group that are similar in size and management fee structure. For example, if a fund is in the first quartile of the ASPG, the fund's management fee ranks in the least expensive or lowest 25% of funds in the ASPG. The ASPG represents at least 15% of the funds in the Total Mapped Group with comparable asset size and management fee structures, subject to a minimum of 50 funds (or all funds in the Total Mapped Group if fewer than 50). Additional information, such as the ASPG quartile in which a fund's management fee rate ranked, is also included in the charts and considered by the Board.

Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund


The Board noted that the fund's management fee rate ranked below the median of its Total Mapped Group and below the median of its ASPG for 2015.

Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund


The Board noted that the fund's management fee rate ranked equal to the median of its Total Mapped Group and above the median of its ASPG for 2015. The Board noted that there is a relatively small number of state-specific funds in the Lipper objective.

The Board noted that, in 2014, the ad hoc Committee on Group Fee was formed by it and the boards of other Fidelity funds to conduct an in-depth review of the "group fee" component of the management fee of funds with such management fee structures. The Committee's focus included the mechanics of the group fee, the competitive landscape of group fee structures, Fidelity funds with no group fee component and investment products not included in group fee assets. The Board also considered that, for funds subject to the group fee, FMR agreed to voluntarily waive fees over a specified period of time in amounts designed to account for assets converted from certain funds to certain collective investment trusts.

Based on its review, the Board concluded that each fund's management fee is fair and reasonable in light of the services that the fund receives and the other factors considered.

Total Expense Ratio.  In its review of each fund's total expense ratio, the Board considered the fund's management fee rate as well as other fund expenses, such as transfer agent fees, pricing and bookkeeping fees, and custodial, legal, and audit fees. The Board also noted that Fidelity may agree to waive fees and expenses from time to time, and the extent to which, if any, it has done so for the funds. As part of its review, the Board also considered the current and historical total expense ratios of each fund compared to competitive fund median expenses. Each fund is compared to those funds and classes in the Total Mapped Group (used by the Board for management fee comparisons) that have a similar sales load structure.

The Board noted that Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund's total expense ratio ranked below the competitive median for 2015 and Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund's total expense ratio ranked equal to the competitive median for 2015. The Board considered that Fidelity has been voluntarily waiving part or all of the transfer agent fees and/or management fees to maintain a minimum yield for Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund.

Fees Charged to Other Fidelity Clients.  The Board also considered Fidelity fee structures and other information with respect to clients of Fidelity, such as other funds advised or subadvised by Fidelity, pension plan clients, and other institutional clients with similar mandates. The Board noted that an ad hoc joint committee created by it and the boards of other Fidelity funds periodically (most recently in 2013) reviews and compares Fidelity's institutional investment advisory business with its business of providing services to the Fidelity funds, including the differences in services provided, fees charged, and costs incurred, as well as competition in their respective marketplaces.

Based on its review of total expense ratios and fees charged to other Fidelity clients, the Board concluded that each fund's total expense ratio was reasonable in light of the services that the fund and its shareholders receive and the other factors considered.

Costs of the Services and Profitability.  The Board considered the revenues earned and the expenses incurred by Fidelity in conducting the business of developing, marketing, distributing, managing, administering and servicing each fund and servicing each fund's shareholders. The Board also considered the level of Fidelity's profits in respect of all the Fidelity funds.

On an annual basis, Fidelity presents to the Board information about the profitability of its relationships with each fund. Fidelity calculates profitability information for each fund, as well as aggregate profitability information for groups of Fidelity funds and all Fidelity funds, using a series of detailed revenue and cost allocation methodologies which originate with the books and records of Fidelity on which Fidelity's audited financial statements are based. The Audit Committee of the Board reviews any significant changes from the prior year's methodologies.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC), independent registered public accounting firm and auditor to Fidelity and certain Fidelity funds, has been engaged annually by the Board as part of the Board's assessment of Fidelity's profitability analysis. PwC's engagement includes the review and assessment of the methodologies used by Fidelity in determining the revenues and expenses attributable to Fidelity's mutual fund business, and completion of agreed-upon procedures in respect of the mathematical accuracy of the fund profitability information and its conformity to established allocation methodologies. After considering PwC's reports issued under the engagement and information provided by Fidelity, the Board concluded that while other allocation methods may also be reasonable, Fidelity's profitability methodologies are reasonable in all material respects.

The Board also reviewed Fidelity's non-fund businesses and fall-out benefits related to the mutual fund business as well as cases where Fidelity's affiliates may benefit from or be related to the funds' business.

The Board considered the costs of the services provided by and the profits realized by Fidelity in connection with the operation of each fund and was satisfied that the profitability was not excessive.

Economies of Scale.  The Board considered whether there have been economies of scale in respect of the management of the Fidelity funds, whether the Fidelity funds (including each fund) have appropriately benefited from any such economies of scale, and whether there is potential for realization of any further economies of scale. The Board considered the extent to which each fund will benefit from economies of scale as assets grow through increased services to the fund, through waivers or reimbursements, or through fee or expense ratio reductions. The Board also noted that a committee (the Economies of Scale Committee) created by it and the boards of other Fidelity funds periodically (most recently in 2013) analyzes whether Fidelity attains economies of scale in respect of the management and servicing of the Fidelity funds, whether the Fidelity funds have appropriately benefited from such economies of scale, and whether there is potential for realization of any further economies of scale.

The Board recognized that each fund's management contract incorporates a "group fee" structure, which provides for lower group fee rates as total group assets increase, and for higher group fee rates as total group assets decrease (with "group assets" defined to include fund assets under FMR's management plus the assets of sector funds previously under FMR's management). FMR calculates the group fee rates based on a tiered asset "breakpoint" schedule that varies based on asset class. The Board considered that the group fee is designed to deliver the benefits of economies of scale to fund shareholders when total Fidelity fund assets increase, even if assets of any particular fund are unchanged or have declined, because some portion of Fidelity's costs are attributable to services provided to all Fidelity funds, and all funds benefit if those costs can be allocated among more assets. The Board concluded that, given the group fee structure, fund shareholders will benefit from lower management fees as group assets increase at the fund complex level, regardless of whether Fidelity achieves any such economies of scale.

The Board concluded, taking into account the analysis of the Economies of Scale Committee, that economies of scale, if any, are being appropriately shared between fund shareholders and Fidelity.

Additional Information Requested by the Board.  In order to develop fully the factual basis for consideration of the Fidelity funds' advisory contracts, the Board requested and received additional information on certain topics, including: (i) Fidelity's fund profitability methodology, profitability trends for certain funds, and the impact of certain factors on fund profitability results; (ii) portfolio manager changes that have occurred during the past year and the amount of the investment that each portfolio manager has made in the Fidelity fund(s) that he or she manages; (iii) Fidelity's compensation structure for portfolio managers, research analysts, and other key personnel, including its effects on fund profitability, the rationale for the compensation structure, and the extent to which current market conditions have affected retention and recruitment; (iv) the arrangements with and compensation paid to certain fund sub-advisers on behalf of the Fidelity funds; (v) Fidelity's voluntary waiver of its fees to maintain minimum yields for certain money market funds and classes as well as contractual waivers in place for certain funds; (vi) the methodology with respect to competitive fund data and peer group classifications; (vii) Fidelity's transfer agent fee, expense, and service structures for different funds and classes relative to competitive trends, and the impact of the increased use of omnibus accounts; (viii) Fidelity's long-term expectations for its offerings in the workplace investing channel; (ix) new developments in the retail and institutional marketplaces; (x) the approach to considering "fall-out" benefits; and (xi) the impact of money market reform on Fidelity's money market funds, including with respect to costs and profitability. In addition, the Board considered its discussions with Fidelity throughout the year regarding enhanced information security initiatives and the funds' fair valuation policies.

Based on its evaluation of all of the conclusions noted above, and after considering all factors it believed relevant, the Board concluded that the advisory fee structures are fair and reasonable, and that each fund's Advisory Contracts should be renewed.

Proxy Voting Results

A special meeting of Fidelity® Connecticut Municipal Money Market Fund's shareholders was held on February 12, 2016. The results of votes taken among shareholders on the proposal before them are reported below. Each vote reported represents one dollar of net asset value held on the record date for the meeting.

PROPOSAL 1

To elect a Board of Trustees. 
 # of
Votes 
% of
Votes 
Elizabeth S. Acton   
Affirmative 1,486,522,730.35 95.214 
Withheld 74,726,053.46 4.786 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
John Engler   
Affirmative 1,482,823,273.95 94.977 
Withheld 78,425,509.86 5.023 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Albert R. Gamper, Jr.   
Affirmative 1,481,651,961.13 94.902 
Withheld 79,596,822.68 5.098 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Robert F. Gartland   
Affirmative 1,488,722,172.69 95.355 
Withheld 72,526,611.12 4.645 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Abigail P. Johnson   
Affirmative 1,483,995,610.86 95.052 
Withheld 77,253,172.95 4.948 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Arthur E. Johnson   
Affirmative 1,482,398,567.75 94.950 
Withheld 78,850,216.06 5.050 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Michael E. Kenneally   
Affirmative 1,488,531,341.79 95.343 
Withheld 72,717,442.02 4.657 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
James H. Keyes   
Affirmative 1,486,787,591.37 95.231 
Withheld 74,461,192.44 4.769 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Marie L. Knowles   
Affirmative 1,488,402,727.87 95.335 
Withheld 72,846,055.94 4.665 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Geoffrey A. von Kuhn   
Affirmative 1,485,917,012.24 95.175 
Withheld 75,331,771.57 4.825 
TOTAL 1,561,248,783.81 100.000 
Proposal 1 reflects trust wide proposal and voting results. 





Fidelity Investments

Corporate Headquarters

245 Summer St.

Boston, MA 02210

www.fidelity.com

CTF-ANN-0117
1.539232.119




Item 2.

Code of Ethics


As of the end of the period, November 30, 2016, Fidelity Court Street Trust (the trust) has adopted a code of ethics, as defined in Item 2 of Form N-CSR, that applies to its President and Treasurer and its Chief Financial Officer.  A copy of the code of ethics is filed as an exhibit to this Form N-CSR.


Item 3.

Audit Committee Financial Expert


The Board of Trustees of the trust has determined that Elizabeth S. Acton is an audit committee financial expert, as defined in Item 3 of Form N-CSR.   Ms. Acton is independent for purposes of Item 3 of Form N-CSR.  


Item 4.  

Principal Accountant Fees and Services


Fees and Services


The following table presents fees billed by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”) in each of the last two fiscal years for services rendered to Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund and Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund (the “Funds”):


Services Billed by PwC


November 30, 2016 FeesA

 

Audit Fees

Audit-Related Fees

Tax Fees

All Other Fees

Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

 $53,000  

$-

 $2,400

 $2,300

Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

 $49,000  

$-

 $2,400

 $2,200



November 30, 2015 FeesA

 

Audit Fees

Audit-Related Fees

Tax Fees

All Other Fees

Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund

 $51,000  

$-

 $2,300

 $1,700

Fidelity New Jersey Municipal Income Fund

 $48,000  

$-

 $2,300

 $1,700



A Amounts may reflect rounding.


The following table presents fees billed by PwC that were required to be approved by the Audit Committee for services that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds and that are rendered on behalf of Fidelity Management & Research Company (“FMR”) and entities controlling, controlled by, or under common control with FMR (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser) that provide ongoing services to the Funds (“Fund Service Providers”):


Services Billed by PwC



 

November 30, 2016A

November 30, 2015A

Audit-Related Fees

 $5,315,000

 $5,890,000

Tax Fees

$10,000

$-

All Other Fees

$-

$-


A Amounts may reflect rounding.


“Audit-Related Fees” represent fees billed for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the fund audit or the review of the fund's financial statements and that are not reported under Audit Fees.


“Tax Fees” represent fees billed for tax compliance, tax advice or tax planning that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the fund.


“All Other Fees” represent fees billed for services provided to the fund or Fund Service Provider, a significant portion of which are assurance related, that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the fund, excluding those services that are reported under Audit Fees, Audit-Related Fees or Tax Fees.  


Assurance services must be performed by an independent public accountant.


* * *


The aggregate non-audit fees billed by PwC for services rendered to the Funds, FMR (not including any sub-adviser whose role is primarily portfolio management and is subcontracted with or overseen by another investment adviser), and any Fund Service Provider for each of the last two fiscal years of the Funds are as follows:


Billed By

November 30, 2016 A

November 30, 2015 A

PwC

$6,610,000

$7,060,000


A Amounts may reflect rounding.


The trust's Audit Committee has considered non-audit services that were not pre-approved that were provided by PwC to Fund Service Providers to be compatible with maintaining the independence of PwC in its audit of the Funds, taking into account representations from PwC, in accordance with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board rules, regarding its independence from the Funds and their related entities and FMR’s review of the appropriateness and permissibility under applicable law of such non-audit services prior to their provision to the Fund Service Providers.


Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

 

The trust’s Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit services provided by a fund’s independent registered public accounting firm relating to the operations or financial reporting of the fund. Prior to the commencement of any audit or non-audit services to a fund, the Audit Committee reviews the services to determine whether they are appropriate and permissible under applicable law.


The Audit Committee has adopted policies and procedures to, among other purposes, provide a framework for the Committee’s consideration of non-audit services by the audit firms that audit the Fidelity funds. The policies and procedures require that any non-audit service provided by a fund audit firm to a Fidelity fund and any non-audit service provided by a fund auditor to a Fund Service Provider that relates directly to the operations and financial reporting of a Fidelity fund (“Covered Service”) are subject to approval by the Audit Committee before such service is provided.


All Covered Services must be approved in advance of provision of the service either: (i) by formal resolution of the Audit Committee, or (ii) by oral or written approval of the service by the Chair of the Audit Committee (or if the Chair is unavailable, such other member of the Audit Committee as may be designated by the Chair to act in the Chair’s absence). The approval contemplated by (ii) above is permitted where the Treasurer determines that action on such an engagement is necessary before the next meeting of the Audit Committee.


Non-audit services provided by a fund audit firm to a Fund Service Provider that do not relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of a Fidelity fund are reported to the Audit Committee on a periodic basis.


Non-Audit Services Approved Pursuant to Rule 2-01(c)(7)(i)(C) and (ii) of Regulation S-X (“De Minimis Exception”)


There were no non-audit services approved or required to be approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the De Minimis Exception during the Funds’ last two fiscal years relating to services provided to (i) the Funds or (ii) any Fund Service Provider that relate directly to the operations and financial reporting of the Funds.



Item 5.

Audit Committee of Listed Registrants


Not applicable.


Item 6.  

Investments


(a)

Not applicable.


(b)

Not applicable


Item 7.

Disclosure of Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures for Closed-End Management Investment Companies


Not applicable.


Item 8.

Portfolio Managers of Closed-End Management Investment Companies


Not applicable.


Item 9.  

Purchase of Equity Securities by Closed-End Management Investment Company and Affiliated Purchasers


Not applicable.


Item 10.

Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders


There were no material changes to the procedures by which shareholders may recommend nominees to the trust’s Board of Trustees.


Item 11.

Controls and Procedures


(a)(i)  The President and Treasurer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the trust’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 30a-3(c) under the Investment Company Act) provide reasonable assurances that material information relating to the trust is made known to them by the appropriate persons, based on their evaluation of these controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days of the filing date of this report.


(a)(ii)  There was no change in the trust’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 30a-3(d) under the Investment Company Act) that occurred during the second fiscal quarter of the period covered by this report that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the trust’s internal control over financial reporting.


Item 12.

Exhibits


(a)

(1)

Code of Ethics pursuant to Item 2 of Form N-CSR is filed and attached hereto as EX-99.CODE ETH.

(a)

(2)

Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(a) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(a)) is filed and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.CERT.

(a)

(3)

Not applicable.

(b)

 

Certification pursuant to Rule 30a-2(b) under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (17 CFR 270.30a-2(b)) is furnished and attached hereto as Exhibit 99.906CERT.




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


Fidelity Court Street Trust


By:

/s/ Stephanie J. Dorsey

 

Stephanie J. Dorsey

 

President and Treasurer

 

 

Date:

January 25, 2017



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.



By:

/s/Stephanie J. Dorsey

 

Stephanie J. Dorsey

 

President and Treasurer

 

 

Date:

January 25, 2017



By:

/s/Howard J. Galligan III

 

Howard J. Galligan III

 

Chief Financial Officer

 

 

Date:

January 25, 2017