YTD
|
1 Year
|
3 Year
|
5 Year
|
10 Year
|
|||||
HIT Total Gross Rate of Return
|
(0.53%)
|
3.32%
|
5.79%
|
6.07%
|
5.54%
|
||||
HIT Total Net Rate of Return
|
(0.57%)
|
2.89%
|
5.34%
|
5.62%
|
5.11%
|
||||
Barclays Capital Aggregate Bond Index
|
(0.70%)
|
2.59%
|
5.41%
|
5.45%
|
5.10%
|
||||
The performance data quoted represents past performance and is no guarantee of future results. Investment results and principal value will fluctuate so that units in the HIT, when redeemed, may be worth more or less than their original cost. The HIT's current performance may be lower or higher than the performance quoted. Performance data current to the most recent month-end is available from the HIT's website at www.aflcio-hit.com. Gross performance figures do not reflect the deduction of HIT expenses. Net performance figures reflect the deduction of HIT expenses and are the performance figures investors experience in the HIT. Information about HIT expenses can be found on page 1 of the HIT’s current prospectus.
|
●
|
The HIT’s ongoing yield advantage over the Barclays Aggregate.
|
●
|
Strong performance from the HIT’s agency multifamily mortgage-backed securities (MBS) as spreads to Treasuries tightened across sectors. Ginnie Mae permanent and construction/permanent certificate spreads contracted by 10 and 6 basis points (bps), respectively. Spreads on Fannie Mae multifamily DUS securities also tightened for most structures, with the 10/9.5s contracting by approximately 4 bps and shorter duration 5/4.5s widening by about 3 bps. Moreover, the HIT benefited from its overweight to higher coupon multifamily MBS as the rise in interest rates and steepening of the yield curve caused their risk premiums to shrink.
|
●
|
The portfolio’s slightly short duration relative to the index (-0.59 years) as rates rose across the yield curve.
|
●
|
The HIT’s underweight to Treasuries as this was the second worst performing major sector in the Barclays Aggregate. As of January 31, 2013, the portfolio had an 8.4% allocation to Treasuries compared to 36.6% in the index.
|
●
|
The portfolio’s underweight to agency fixed-rate single family MBS (RMBS) as this was the worst performing major sector in the index, with excess returns of -5 bps. At the end of January, the portfolio had a 24.7% allocation compared to 29.4% of the Barclays Aggregate.
|
●
|
Strong performance by corporate bonds, the best performing major sector in the Barclays Aggregate with excess returns to Treasuries of 35 bps. The HIT does not invest in corporate bonds, whereas the sector comprised 21.6% of the index as of January 31, 2013.
|
●
|
The portfolio’s overweight to the highest credit quality sector of the investment grade universe, whose excess returns were the lowest among the four credit ratings buckets (AAA, AA, A, and BBB) of the Barclays Aggregate. Those returns were -2, 23, 33, and 38 bps, respectively. The HIT has an overweight with respect to the index in high credit quality investments. Over 92% of the HIT portfolio was AAA-rated or carried a government or government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) guarantee compared to 73% for the Barclays Aggregate at the end of January.
|
Sector
|
Absolute
Return
|
Excess Return
(bps)
|
Modified Adjusted
Duration
|
U.S. Treasuries
|
-0.81%
|
0
|
5.29
|
Agencies
|
-0.45%
|
+2
|
3.90
|
Single family agency MBS (RMBS)
|
-0.50%
|
-5
|
3.88
|
Corporates
|
-0.89%
|
+35
|
7.08
|
Commercial MBS (CMBS)
|
-0.15%
|
+7
|
3.14
|
Asset-backed securities (ABS)
|
-0.25%
|
+1
|
3.07
|
Maturity
|
12/31/12
|
1/31/13
|
Change
|
1 Month
|
0.018%
|
0.038%
|
0.020%
|
3 Month
|
0.043%
|
0.074%
|
0.030%
|
6 Month
|
0.114%
|
0.114%
|
0.000%
|
1 Year
|
0.140%
|
0.134%
|
-0.005%
|
2 Year
|
0.249%
|
0.264%
|
0.015%
|
3 Year
|
0.353%
|
0.403%
|
0.050%
|
5 Year
|
0.724%
|
0.879%
|
0.155%
|
7 Year
|
1.180%
|
1.386%
|
0.206%
|
10 Year
|
1.758%
|
1.986%
|
0.228%
|
30 Year
|
2.950%
|
3.173%
|
0.222%
|