EX-99 2 exh.txt EXHIBIT 77.B. ACCOUNTANT'S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and the Shareholders of Columbia Daily Income Company In planning and performing our audit of the financial statements of Columbia Daily Income Company (the "Fund") for the year ended August 31, 2004, we considered its internal control, including control activities for safeguarding securities, in order to determine our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements and to comply with the requirements of Form N-SAR, not to provide assurance on internal control. The management of the Fund is responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control. In fulfilling this responsibility, estimates and judgments by management are required to assess the expected benefits and related costs of controls. Generally, controls that are relevant to an audit pertain to the entity's objective of preparing financial statements for external purposes that are fairly presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Those controls include the safeguarding of assets against unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition. Because of inherent limitations in internal control, errors or fraud may occur and not be detected. Also, projection of any evaluation of internal control to future periods is subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the effectiveness of their design and operation may deteriorate. Our consideration of internal control would not necessarily disclose all matters in internal control that might be material weaknesses under standards established by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A material weakness, for purposes of this report, is a condition in which the design or operation of one or more of the internal control components does not reduce to a relatively low level the risk that misstatements caused by error or fraud in amounts that would be material in relation to the financial statements being audited may occur and not be detected within a timely period by employees in the normal course of performing their assigned functions. However, we noted no matters involving internal control and its operation, including controls for safeguarding securities, that we consider to be material weaknesses as defined above as of August 31, 2004. This report is intended solely for the information and use of the Board of Directors, management and the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP October 18, 2004 EXHIBIT 77.E SUB-ITEM 77.E LEGAL PROCEEDINGS Recently, Columbia Management Advisors, Inc. ("CMA") has been named as a defendant in several derivative actions under Sections 34(b), 36(b) and 48(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, alleging, among other things, that the fees and expenses paid by the Registrant are excessive. Cohen v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on August 2, 2004; Osburn v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on August 10, 2004; Slicker v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on August 11, 2004; and Simmonds v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation was filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on September 8, 2004. CMA and the other defendants to these actions, including various affiliates, mutual funds advised by CMA and its affiliates, and directors of such funds, have denied these allegations and are contesting the plaintiffs' claims. Various civil individual, class and derivative actions have been filed in regard to certain market timing allegations. As of August 31, 2004, the following complaints have been received: (1) George Slaybe et al, Plaintiffs, v. Columbia Management Advisors, Inc., et al. United States District Court District of Massachusetts Case # 04 10534 PBS (2) David Armetta derivatively on behalf of the Columbia Common Stock Fund, Plaintiff v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation, et al. United States District Court District of Massachusetts Case # 04 10555 MLW (3) Edward I. Segel and Iris Segel derivatively on behalf of Columbia Acorn Fund, Columbia Acorn Trust and the Columbia Funds, Plaintiffs, v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation, et al. United States District Court District of Massachusetts Case # 04-10567MEL (4) Catherine Dukes, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Columbia Funds, FleetBoston Financial Corporation, et al. United States District Court District of Massachusetts Case # 04-10315-PBS EXHIBIT 77.E SUB-ITEM 77.E LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - Continued. (5) AB Medical Equipment Corp., Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation, et al. United States District Court District of Massachusetts Case # 04-10355PBS (6) Karen M. McKenna, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Plaintiff, v. Columbia Funds, Columbia Acorn Trust, FleetBoston Financial Corporation, et al. United States District Court Southern District of New York Case # 04 CV 1576 (7) Lawrence S. Wick, as custodian for Ryan S. Wick, Andrew T. Wick, and Hayley L. Wick, and Ryan S. Wick, Andrew T. Wick, and Hayley L. Wick individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation, et al. United States District Court District of Massachusetts Case # 04-10408HEL (8) Steven B. Ehrlich, Custodian for Cory Ryan Ehrlich UTMA/Florida, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation, et al. United States District Court District of Massachusetts Case # 04 10405 PBS (9) Harold Beardsley, et al on behalf of Columbia Disciplined Value Fund (the "Columbia Funds") v. FleetBoston Financial Corporation, et al United States District Court District of Massachusetts Case # 04 10978 PBS