XML 29 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.10.0.1
Derivative Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2018
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities Disclosure [Abstract]  
Derivative Instruments and Fair Value Measurements Derivative Instruments and Fair Value Measurements
Derivative Instruments

In the normal course of our operations, our crude oil marketing segment purchases and sells crude oil. We seek to profit by procuring the commodity as it is produced and then delivering the material to the end users or the intermediate use marketplace. As typical for the industry, these transactions are made pursuant to the terms of forward month commodity purchase and/or sale contracts. Some of these contracts meet the definition of a derivative instrument, and therefore, we account for these contracts at fair value, unless the normal purchase and sale exception is applicable. These types of underlying contracts are standard for the industry and are the governing document for our crude oil marketing segment. None of our derivative instruments have been designated as hedging instruments.

At June 30, 2018, we had in place 16 commodity purchase and sale contracts, of which four of these contracts had no fair value associated with them as the contractual prices of crude oil were within the range of prices specified in the agreements. These commodity purchase and sale contracts encompassed approximately:
• 646 barrels per day of crude oil during July 2018;
• 322 barrels per day of crude oil during August through September 2018;
• 258 barrels per day of crude oil during October through December 2018;  
• 322 barrels per day of crude oil during January 2019 through April 2019; and
• 258 barrels per day of crude oil during May 2019.
The estimated fair value of forward month commodity contracts (derivatives) reflected in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet were as follows at the date indicated (in thousands):

June 30, 2018
Balance Sheet Location and Amount
CurrentOtherCurrentOther
AssetsAssetsLiabilitiesLiabilities
Asset derivatives:
Fair value forward hydrocarbon commodity
contracts at gross valuation$538 $— $— $— 
Liability derivatives:
Fair value forward hydrocarbon commodity
contracts at gross valuation— — 514 — 
Less counterparty offsets— — — — 
As reported fair value contracts$538 $— $514 $— 


At December 31, 2017, we had in place 20 commodity purchase and sale contracts, of which four of these contracts had no fair value associated with them as the contractual prices of crude oil were within the range of prices specified in the agreements. These commodity purchase and sale contracts encompassed approximately:
• 452 barrels per day of crude oil during January 2018;
• 322 barrels per day of crude oil during February through May 2018;
• 258 barrels per day of crude oil during June 2018;
• 646 barrels per day of crude oil during July 2018;
• 322 barrels per day of crude oil during August through September 2018; and
• 258 barrels per day of crude oil during October through December 2018.
The estimated fair value of forward month commodity contracts (derivatives) reflected in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated balance sheet were as follows at the date indicated (in thousands):

December 31, 2017
Balance Sheet Location and Amount
CurrentOtherCurrentOther
AssetsAssetsLiabilitiesLiabilities
Asset derivatives:
Fair value forward hydrocarbon commodity
contracts at gross valuation$166 $— $— $— 
Liability derivatives:
Fair value forward hydrocarbon commodity
contracts at gross valuation— — 145 — 
Less counterparty offsets— — — — 
As reported fair value contracts$166 $— $145 $— 
We only enter into commodity contracts with creditworthy counterparties and evaluate our exposure to significant counterparties on an ongoing basis. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, we were not holding nor have we posted any collateral to support our forward month fair value derivative activity. We are not subject to any credit-risk related trigger events. We have no other financial investment arrangements that would serve to offset our derivative contracts.

Forward month commodity contracts (derivatives) reflected in the accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated statements of operations were as follows for the periods indicated (in thousands):

Gains (losses)
Three Months EndedSix Months Ended
June 30,June 30,
2018201720182017
Revenues – marketing$$280 $$700 


Fair Value Measurements

The following tables set forth, by level with the Level 1, 2 and 3 fair value hierarchy, the carrying values of our financial assets and liabilities at the dates indicated (in thousands):

June 30, 2018
Fair Value Measurements Using
Quoted Prices
in ActiveSignificant
Markets forOtherSignificant
Identical AssetsObservableUnobservable
and LiabilitiesInputsInputsCounterparty
(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)OffsetsTotal
Derivatives:
Current assets$— $538 $— $— $538 
Current liabilities— (514)— — (514)
Net value$— $24 $— $— $24 



December 31, 2017
Fair Value Measurements Using
Quoted Prices
in ActiveSignificant
Markets forOtherSignificant
Identical AssetsObservableUnobservable
and LiabilitiesInputsInputsCounterparty
(Level 1)(Level 2)(Level 3)OffsetsTotal
Derivatives:
Current assets$— $166 $— $— $166 
Current liabilities— (145)— — (145)
Net value$— $21 $— $— $21 
These assets and liabilities are measured on a recurring basis and are classified based on the lowest level of input used to estimate their fair value. Our assessment of the relative significance of these inputs requires judgments.

When determining fair value measurements, we make credit valuation adjustments to reflect both our own nonperformance risk and our counterparty’s nonperformance risk. When adjusting the fair value of derivative contracts for the effect of nonperformance risk, we consider the impact of netting and any applicable credit enhancements. Credit valuation adjustments utilize Level 3 inputs, such as credit scores to evaluate the likelihood of default by us or our counterparties. At June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, credit valuation adjustments were not significant to the overall valuation of our fair value contracts. As a result, applicable fair value assets and liabilities are included in their entirety in the fair value hierarchy.