XML 64 R11.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurements
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Accounting standards establish a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:
Level 1
Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
Level 2
Quoted market prices in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability; and
Level 3
Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).
The following table sets forth the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually) by level within the fair value hierarchy. As required by accounting guidance, assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement (in thousands):
 
Fair Value at March 31, 2012
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3  
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
$
25,679

 
$
25,679

 
$

 
$

Short-term investments
1,316

 
1,316

 

 

Marketable equity securities
20,268

 
20,268

 

 

Restricted certificates of deposit
897

 
897

 

 

Put and call options
98

 

 
98

 

Silver ounces receivable from Mandalay
899

 

 
899

 

 
$
49,157

 
$
48,160

 
$
997

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Royalty obligation embedded derivative
$
171,797

 
$

 
$
171,797

 
$

Put and call options
17,782

 

 
17,782

 

Other derivative instruments, net
13

 

 
13

 

 
$
189,592

 
$

 
$
189,592

 
$


 
 
Fair Value at December 31, 2011
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3  
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Cash equivalents
$
44,708

 
$
44,708

 
$

 
$

Short term investments
20,254

 
20,254

 

 

Marketable securities
19,844

 
19,844

 

 

Restricted certificates of deposit
548

 
548

 

 

Put and call options
3,040

 

 
3,040

 

Silver ounces receivable from Mandalay
814

 

 
814

 

 
$
89,208

 
$
85,354

 
$
3,854

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Royalty obligation embedded derivative
$
159,400

 
$

 
$
159,400

 
$

Put and call options
20,892

 

 
20,892

 

Other derivative instruments, net
4,012

 

 
4,012

 

 
$
184,304

 
$

 
$
184,304

 
$


The Company’s cash equivalents and short-term investments are readily convertible to cash and, therefore these investments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s marketable equity securities are recorded at fair market value in the financial statements based on quoted market prices, which are accessible at the measurement date for identical assets. Such instruments are classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company’s derivative instruments related to the put and call options, silver ounces receivable from Mandalay, royalty obligation embedded derivative, and other derivative instruments, net, which relate to the concentrate sales contracts and foreign exchange contracts, are valued using pricing models which require inputs that are derived from observable market data, including contractual terms, forward market prices, yield curves and credit spreads. The model inputs can generally be verified and do not involve significant management judgment. Such instruments are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The Company had no Level 3 financial assets and liabilities as of March 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011.
There were no transfers between levels of fair value measurements of financial assets and liabilities during the first quarter of 2012.
Financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 are set forth in the following table (in thousands):
 
Fair Value at March 31, 2012
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3  
Liabilities:

 
 
 
 
 
 
3.25% Convertible Senior Notes
$
48,658

 
$
48,658

 
$

 
$

Palmarejo Gold Production Royalty Obligation
$
105,613

 
$

 
$
105,613

 
$


 
Fair Value at December 31, 2011
 
Total
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3  
Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
3.25% Convertible Senior Notes
$
49,205

 
$
49,205

 
$

 
$

Palmarejo Gold Production Royalty Obligation
$
111,257

 
$

 
$
111,257

 
$


The fair value at March 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 of the 3.25% Convertible Senior Notes outstanding were determined by market transactions. As such, the notes are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of the Palmarejo Gold Production Royalty Obligation is valued using a pricing model which requires inputs that are derived from observable market data, including contractual terms, yield curves, and credit spreads. The model inputs can generally be verified and do not involve significant management judgment. As such, the obligation is classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value of the Kensington Term Facility is valued at the outstanding principal amount plus accrued but unpaid interest which approximates book value. The interest rate is periodically adjusted per contractual terms to give effect to current rates that market participants would consider when pricing the obligation.
The fair value of the Company's receivables, restricted assets, payables, accrued liabilities, and capital leases approximate book value due to the nature of these assets and liabilities and are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy, except for capital leases which are classified as Level 2.
The fair value of the Company's non-current portion of the refundable value added tax is not practicable to estimate due to the uncertainty of the timing of the expected future cash flows to be received.