XML 26 R15.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v3.8.0.1
Significant Accounting Policies (Policies)
9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2017
Accounting Policies [Abstract]  
Basis of Accounting, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Basis of Presentation
 
Our fiscal years are based on a
52
- or
53
-week period ending on the last Saturday in
December.
The condensed consolidated balance sheet at
December 31, 2016
has been derived from our audited financial statements at that date. The interim condensed consolidated financial statements as of
September 30, 2017 (
also referred to as “the
third
quarter of fiscal
2017”
and “the
first
nine
months of fiscal
2017”
) and
September 24, 2016 (
also referred to as “the
third
quarter of fiscal
2016”
and “the
first
nine
months of fiscal
2016”
) are unaudited. However, in management
’s opinion, these financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal, recurring items) necessary to provide a fair presentation of our financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. The
three
- and
nine
-month periods ended
September 30, 2017
were comprised of
14
and
39
weeks, respectively. The
three
- and
nine
-month periods ended
September 24, 2016
were comprised of
13
and
39
weeks, respectively.
 
Our interim results are
not
necessarily indicative of the results that should be expected for the full year. For
 a better understanding of Cohu, Inc. and our financial statements, we recommend reading these interim condensed consolidated financial statements in conjunction with our audited financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2016,
which are included in our
2016
Annual Report on Form
10
-K, filed with the U. S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). In the following notes to our interim condensed consolidated financial statements, Cohu, Inc. is referred to as “Cohu”, “we”, “our” and “us”.
 
Certain prior year amounts have been restated as a result of our early adoption of Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”)
No.
2016
-
09,
Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic
718
):
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
(ASU
2016
-
09
). While the effective date of ASU
2016
-
09
was for fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2016,
earlier adoption was permitted and we elected to adopt ASU
2016
-
09
during the
fourth
quarter of fiscal
2016.
 
As part of our adoption of ASU
2016
-
09
we elected to eliminate the use of an estimated forfeiture rate and recognize actual forfeitures as they occur. This amendment was adopted on a modified retrospective basis and, as a result, our share-based compensation expense for the
three
- and
nine
-month periods ended
September 24, 2016
were revised and were approximately
$0.1
 million and
$15,000
higher in each period, respectively, under the new method, than what was previously reported.
Discontinued Operations, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Discontinued Operations
 
In
June 2015,
we sold our microwave communications equipment segment, Broadcast Microwave Services, Inc. (“BMS”). See Note
6,
“Discontinued Operations” for additional information. Unless otherwise indicated, all amounts herein relate to continuing operations.
Concentration Risk, Credit Risk, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Concentration of Credit Risk
 
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant credit risk consist principally of cash equivalents, short-term investments and trade accounts receivable. We invest in a variety of financial instruments and, by policy, limit the amount of credit exposure with any
one
issuer.
 
Trade accounts receivable are presented net of allowance for doubtful accounts of
$0.1
 million at both
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016.
Our customers include semiconductor manufacturers and semiconductor test subcontractors throughout many areas of the world. While we believe that our allowance for doubtful accounts is adequate and represents our best estimate at
September 30, 2017,
we will continue to monitor customer liquidity and other economic conditions, which
may
result in changes to our estimates regarding collectability.
Segment Reporting, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Segment Information
 
We applied the provisions of ASC Topic
280,
Segment Reporting
, (“ASC
280”
), which sets forth a management approach to segment reporting and establishes requirements to report selected segment information quarterly and to report annually entity-wide disclosures about products, major customers and the geographies in which the entity holds material assets and reports revenue. An operating segment is defined as a component that engages in business activities whose operating results are reviewed by the chief operating decision maker and for which discrete financial information is available. Based on the provisions of ASC
280,
we have determined that our identified operating segments qualify for aggregation under ASC
280
due to similarities in their customers, their economic characteristics, and the nature of products and services provided. As a result, we report in
one
segment, semiconductor equipment and the financial information disclosed herein materially represents all of the financial information related to our semiconductor equipment segment.
Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Goodwill, Other Intangible Assets and
Long-lived Assets
 
We evaluate goodwill for impairment annually and when an event occurs or circumstances change that indicate that the carrying value
may
not
be recoverable. We test goodwill for impairment by
first
comparing the book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units. If the fair value is determined to be less than the book value, a
second
step is performed to compute the amount of impairment as the difference between the estimated fair value of goodwill and the carrying value. We estimated the fair values of our reporting units primarily using the income approach valuation methodology that includes the discounted cash flow method, taking into consideration the market approach and certain market multiples as a validation of the values derived using the discounted cash flow methodology. Forecasts of future cash flows are based on our best estimate of future net sales and operating expenses, based primarily on customer forecasts, industry trade organization data and general economic conditions.
 
We conduct our annual impairment test as of
October
 
1st
 of each year, and have determined there was
no
impairment as of
October 
1,
2016
as we determined that the estimated fair values of our reporting units exceeded their carrying values on that date. Other events and changes in circumstances
may
also require goodwill to be tested for impairment between annual measurement dates.  
As of
September 30, 2017,
we do
not
believe that circumstances have occurred that indicate impairment of our goodwill is more-likely-than-
not.
  
In the event we determine that an interim goodwill impairment review is required in a future period, the review
may
result in an impairment charge, which would have a negative impact on our results of operations.
 
Long-lived assets, other than goodwill, are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets might
not
be recoverable. Conditions that would necessitate an impairment assessment include a significant decline in the observable market value of an asset, a significant change in the extent or manner in which an asset is used, or any other significant adverse change that would indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or group of assets
may
not
be recoverable. For long-lived assets, impairment losses are only recorded if the asset
’s carrying amount is
not
recoverable through its undiscounted, probability-weighted future cash flows. We measure the impairment loss based on the difference between the carrying amount and estimated fair value.
Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Policy [Policy Text Block]
Foreign Remeasurement and
Currency Translation
 
Assets and liabilities of our wholly owned foreign subsidiaries that use the U.S. Dollar as their functional currency are re-measured using exchange rates in effect at the end of the period, except for nonmonetary assets, such as inventories and property, plant and equipment, which are re-measured using historical exchange rates. Revenues and costs are re-measured using average exchange rates for the period, except for costs related to those balance sheet items that are re-measured using historical exchange rates. Gains and losses on foreign currency transactions are recognized as incurred. During
the
three
and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017,
we recognized foreign exchange losses of
$0.2
 million and
$2.7
 million, respectively, in our condensed consolidated statements of income. During the
three
and
nine
months
ended
September 24, 2016,
we recognized approximately
$0.3
 million and
$1.0
 million of foreign exchange losses in our condensed consolidated statements of income, respectively. Certain of our foreign subsidiaries have designated the local currency as their functional currency and, as a result, their assets and liabilities are translated at the rate of exchange at the balance sheet date, while revenue and expenses are translated using the average exchange rate for the period. Cumulative translation adjustments resulting from the translation of the financial statements are included as a separate component of stockholders’ equity.
Share-based Compensation, Option and Incentive Plans Policy [Policy Text Block]
Share-Based Compensation
 
We measure and recognize all share-based compensation under the fair value method. Our estimate of share-based compensation expense requires a number of complex and subjective assumptions including our stock price volatility, employee exercise patterns (expected life of the options) and related tax effects. The assumptions used in calculating the fair value of share-based awards represent our best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management judgment. Although we believe the assumptions and estimates we have made are reasonable and appropriate, changes in assumptions could materially impact our reported financial results.
 
 
Reported share-based compensation is classified, in the condensed consolidated interim financial statements, as follows
(in thousands)
:
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
   
September 24,
   
September 30,
   
September 24,
 
   
2017
   
2016
   
2017
   
2016
 
Cost of sales
  $
123
    $
101
    $
327
    $
309
 
Research and development
   
278
     
327
     
856
     
955
 
Selling, general and administrative
   
1,459
     
1,330
     
4,153
     
4,027
 
Total share-based compensation
   
1,860
     
1,758
     
5,336
     
5,291
 
Income tax benefit
   
(107
)    
(76
)    
(429
)    
(189
)
Total share-based compensation, net
  $
1,753
    $
1,682
    $
4,907
    $
5,102
 
Earnings Per Share, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Income (Loss) Per Share
 
Basic income (loss) per common share is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the reporting period. Diluted income (loss) per share includes the dilutive effect of common shares potentially issuable upon the exercise of stock options, vesting of outstanding restricted stock and performance stock units and issuance of stock under our employee stock purchase plan using the treasury stock method. In loss periods, potentially dilutive securities are excluded from the per share computations due to their anti-dilutive effect.
For purposes of computing diluted income (loss) per share, stock options with exercise prices that exceed the average fair market value of our common stock for the period are excluded. For the
three
and
nine
months ended
September 30, 2017,
options to issue approximately
5,000
and
103,000
shares of common stock were excluded from the computation, respectively. For the
three
and
nine
months ended
September 24, 2016,
options to issue approximately
707,000
and
752,000
shares of common stock were excluded from the computation, respectively.
 
The following table reconciles the denominators used in computing basic and diluted income (loss) per share (
in thousands)
:
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
   
September 24,
   
September 30,
   
September 24,
 
   
2017
   
2016
   
2017
   
2016
 
Weighted average common shares
   
28,155
     
26,761
     
27,614
     
26,596
 
Effect of dilutive securities
   
950
     
606
     
1,026
     
786
 
     
29,105
     
27,367
     
28,640
     
27,382
 
 
Cohu has utilized the “control number” concept in the computation of diluted earnings per share to determine whether potential common stock instruments are dilutive. The control number used is income from continuing operations. The control number concept requires that the same number of potentially dilutive securities applied in computing diluted earnings per share from continuing operations be applied to all other categories of income or loss, regardless of their anti-dilutive effect on such categories.
Revenue Recognition, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Revenue Recognition
 
Our net sales are derived from the sale of products and services and are adjusted for estimated returns and allowances, which historically have been insignificant. We recognize revenue when there is persuasive evidence of an arrangement, title and risk of loss have passed, delivery has occurred or the services have been rendered, the sales price is fixed or determinable and collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. Title and risk of loss generally pass to our customers upon shipment. In circumstances where either title or risk of loss pass upon destination or acceptance, we defer revenue recognition until such events occur.
 
Revenue for established products that have previously satisfied a customer
’s acceptance requirements and provide for full payment tied to shipment is generally recognized upon shipment and passage of title. In certain instances, customer payment terms
may
provide that a minority portion (e.g. up to
20%
) of the equipment purchase price be paid only upon customer acceptance. In those situations, the majority portion (e.g.
80%
) of revenue where the contingent payment is tied to shipment and the entire product cost of sale are recognized upon shipment and passage of title and the minority portion of the purchase price related to customer acceptance is deferred and recognized upon receipt of customer acceptance. In cases where a prior history of customer acceptance cannot be demonstrated or from sales where customer payment dates are
not
determinable and in the case of new products, revenue and cost of sales is deferred until customer acceptance has been received. Our post-shipment obligations typically include installation and standard warranties. The estimated fair value of installation related revenue is recognized in the period the installation is performed. Service revenue is recognized ratably over the period of the related contract or upon completion of the services if they are short-term in nature. Spares, contactor and kit revenue is generally recognized upon shipment.
 
Certain of our equipment sales are accounted for as multiple-element arrangements. A multiple-element arrangement is a transaction which
may
involve the delivery or performance of multiple products, services, or rights to use assets, and performance
may
occur at different points in time or over different periods of time.
For arrangements containing multiple elements, the revenue relating to the undelivered elements is deferred using the relative selling price method utilizing estimated sales prices until delivery of the deferred elements. We limit the amount of revenue recognition for delivered elements to the amount that is
not
contingent on the future delivery of products or services, future performance obligations or subject to customer-specified return or adjustment.
 
On shipments where sales are
not
recognized, gross profit is generally recorded as deferred profit in our consolidated balance sheet representing the difference between the receivable recorded and the inventory shipped.
At
September 30, 2017,
we had deferred revenue totaling approximately
$9.9
 million and deferred profit of
$6.7
 million. At
December 31, 2016,
we had deferred revenue totaling approximately
$9.3
 million and deferred profit of
$6.9
 million. The periodic change is primarily a result of increases and decreases in deferrals of revenue associated with product shipments made to our customers in accordance with our revenue recognition policy.
 
A small number of customers historically have been responsible for a significant portion of our net sales. Significant customer concentration information is as follows:
 
   
Three Months Ended
   
Nine Months Ended
 
   
September 30,
   
September 24,
   
September 30,
   
September 24,
 
   
2017
   
2016
   
2017
   
2016
 
                                 
Customers individually accounting for more than 10% of net sales
   
two
     
three
     
two
     
two
 
                                 
Percentage of net sales
   
26.5
%    
37.4
%    
28.5
%    
30.5
%
Comprehensive Income, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Our accumulated other comprehensive loss balance totaled approximately
$18.0
 million and
$27.9
 million at
September 30, 2017
and
December 31, 2016,
respectively, and was attributed to all non-owner changes in stockholders’ equity and consists of, on an after-tax basis where applicable, foreign currency adjustments resulting from the translation of certain of our subsidiary accounts where the functional currency is
not
the U.S. Dollar
and adjustments related to postretirement benefits. Reclassification adjustments from accumulated other comprehensive loss
 during the
three
- and
nine
-month periods ended of fiscal
2017
and
2016
were
not
significant.
Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Retiree Medical Benefits
 
We provide post-retirement health benefits to certain executives and directors under a noncontributory plan. The net periodic benefit cost incurred during the
first
nine
months of fiscal
2017
and
2016
was
not
significant.
New Accounting Pronouncements, Policy [Policy Text Block]
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
 
Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In
July 2015,
the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU
No.
2015
-
11,
Simplifying the Measurement of Inventory
. Under this guidance, inventory should be measured at the lower of cost and net realizable value. Subsequent measurement is unchanged for inventory measured using LIFO or the retail inventory method. The adoption of this authoritative guidance did
not
have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
– In
March 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2017
-
07,
 
Compensation – Retirement Benefits (Topic
715
) – Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost
, which provides additional guidance on the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the income statement and on the components eligible for capitalization. The amendments in this guidance require that an employer report the service cost component of the net periodic benefit costs in the same income statement line item as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by employees during the period. The non-service-cost components of net periodic benefit costs are to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost components and outside a subtotal of income from operations. The guidance also allows for the capitalization of the service cost components, when applicable (i.e., as a cost of internally manufactured inventory or a self-constructed asset). The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017,
including interim periods within those annual periods; early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an annual period for which financial statements (interim or annual) have
not
been issued or made available for issuance. The amendments in this guidance are to be applied retrospectively. We are currently assessing the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements.
 
In
January 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2017
-
04,
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment
. It eliminates Step
2
from the goodwill impairment test and requires an entity to recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds the reporting unit's fair value,
not
to exceed the carrying amount of goodwill. This guidance is effective for annual and any interim impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after
December 15, 2019.
We do
not
expect this guidance to have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
In
January 2017,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2017
-
01,
Clarifying the Definition of a Business.
It revises the definition of a business and provides a framework to evaluate when an input and a substantive process are present in an acquisition to be considered a business. This guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after
December 15, 2017.
We do
not
expect this guidance to have any impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
In
November 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
18,
Restricted Cash.
It requires that amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017.
We do
not
expect this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
In
August 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
15,
Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments.
It provides guidance on
eight
specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing the existing diversity in practice in how they are classified in the statement of cash flows. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017.
Early adoption is permitted, provided that all of the amendments are adopted in the same period. We do
not
expect this guidance to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
 
In
February 2016,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2016
-
02,
Leases (Topic
842
)
. Under this guidance, lessees will be required to recognize a right-of-use asset and a lease liability for all operating leases defined under previous GAAP. This guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2018.
The new guidance must be adopted using a modified retrospective transition, and provides for certain practical expedients. We are still completing our analysis on the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures, but recognizing the lease liabilities and related right-of-use assets will impact our balance sheet.
 
 
In
May 2014,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No.
2014
-
09,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606
)
 
(ASU
2014
-
09
)
, which amends the existing accounting standards for revenue recognition. In
August 2015,
the FASB issued ASU
No.
2015
-
14,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606
): Deferral of the Effective Date
, which delays the effective date of
ASU
2014
-
09
by
one
year. The FASB also agreed to allow entities to choose to adopt the standard as of the original effective date. In
March 2016,
the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No.
2016
-
08,
Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic
606
): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net) (ASU
2016
-
08
)
which clarifies the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The guidance includes indicators to assist an entity in determining whether it controls a specified good or service before it is transferred to customers. The new revenue recognition standard will be effective for us in the
first
quarter of
2018.
We will adopt the new standard effective
December 31, 2017,
which is the
first
day of our
2018
fiscal year. The new standard also permits
two
methods of adoption: retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented (the full retrospective method), or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially applying the guidance recognized at the date of initial application (the modified retrospective method)
 
We currently anticipate adopting the standard using the modified retrospective method. We are still in the process of completing our analysis on the impact this guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. Based on our preliminary review of our customer agreements, we currently expect that our revenue will continue to be recognized at a point in time, generally upon shipment of products to customers, consistent with our current revenue recognition model. In certain instances, when customer payment terms provide that a minority portion of the equipment purchase price be paid only upon customer acceptance, recognition of revenue
may
occur sooner under the new model.
  When adopting the new standard, on
December 31, 2017,
revenue that was
not
recognized in fiscal
2017,
because the equipment had
not
been accepted by the customer, will be recognized as a cumulative catch-up adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as opposed to being recognized as future revenue upon acceptance. As the timing of customer acceptances cannot be predicted, we do
not
know the impact on future revenues and associated operating income at this time.  However, revenues, deferred profit, cost of sales, and associated operating income
may
be materially impacted depending on the timing of customer acceptance.