Columbia Acorn Trust

Committee

Members

Function

Number of
Meetings in 2010

Michelle L. Collins
(chair)
Maureen M. Culhane

John C. Heaton

Makes recommendations to the Board regarding the selection of independent auditors for the Trust, confers with the independent auditors regarding the scope and results of each audit and carries out the provisions of its charter.

Compliance

Margaret M. Eisen
(chair)
Michelle L. Collins
Steven N. Kaplan

Provides oversight of the monitoring processes and controls regarding the Trust with respect to legal, regulatory and internal rules, policies, procedures and standards, other than those relating to accounting matters and oversees compliance by the Funds’ service providers.

497 1 d497.htm COLUMBIA ACORN TRUST Columbia Acorn Trust

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

Dated as of August 19, 2011

Columbia Management^®

COLUMBIA ACORN TRUST

Class A, Class C, Class I and Class Z Shares

STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

August 19, 2011


International Equity Funds	Class A Shares	Class C Shares	Class I Shares	Class Z Shares
Columbia Acorn European Fund	CAEAX	CAECX	CAFIX	CAEZX
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund	CAGAX	CGMCX	CATIX	CEFZX

This Statement of Additional Information (SAI) is not a prospectus, is not a substitute for reading any prospectus and is intended to be read in conjunction with the Funds’ prospectuses dated August 19, 2011.

Copies of the Funds’ current prospectuses may be obtained without charge by writing Columbia Management Investment Services Corp., P.O. Box 8081, Boston, MA 02266-8081, by calling Columbia Funds at 800.345.6611 or by visiting the Columbia Funds website at www.columbiamanagement.com.

C-1822 A (8/11)


TABLE OF CONTENTS

SAI PRIMER		2
ABOUT THE TRUST		5
ABOUT THE FUNDS’ INVESTMENTS		6
Certain Investment Activity Limits		6
Fundamental and Non-Fundamental Investment Policies		6
Permissible Investments and Related Risks		9
Borrowings		38
Short Sales		38
Lending Securities		39
Portfolio Turnover		40
Disclosure of Portfolio Information		40
INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND OTHER SERVICES		44
The Adviser and Investment Advisory Services		44
The Administrator		48
The Principal Underwriter/Distributor		49

	Other Roles and Relationships of Ameriprise Financial and its Affiliates — Certain Conflicts of Interest	49
Other Service Providers		53
Codes of Ethics		55
Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures		55
FUND GOVERNANCE		57
BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES		74
Brokerage Commissions		76
Directed Brokerage		76
Securities of Regular Broker/Dealers		77
Additional Shareholder Servicing Payments		77
Additional Selling and/or Servicing Agent Payments		79
CAPITAL STOCK AND OTHER SECURITIES		81
Description of the Trust’s Shares		81
PURCHASE, REDEMPTION AND PRICING OF SHARES		84
Purchase and Redemption		84
Offering Price		86
TAXATION		88
CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS		100
APPENDIX A — DESCRIPTIONS OF SECURITIES RATINGS		A-1
APPENDIX B — THE ADVISER’S PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL		B-1
APPENDIX C — INFORMATION REGARDING PENDING AND SETTLED LEGAL PROCEEDINGS		C-1
APPENDIX D — MORE INFORMATION ABOUT CHOOSING A SHARE CLASS		D-1

SAI PRIMER

The SAI is a part of the Funds’ registration statement that is filed with the SEC. The registration statement includes the Funds’ prospectuses, the SAI and certain exhibits. The SAI, and any supplements to it, can be found online at www.columbiamanagement.com, or by accessing the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

For purposes of any electronic version of this SAI, all references to websites, or universal resource locators (URLs), are intended to be inactive and are not meant to incorporate the contents of any website into this SAI.

The SAI generally provides additional information about the Funds that is not required to be in the Funds’ prospectuses. The SAI expands discussions of certain matters described in the Funds’ prospectuses and provides certain additional information about the Funds that may be of interest to some investors. Among other things, the SAI provides information about:

•

the organization of the Trust;

•

the Funds’ investments;

•

the Funds’ investment adviser and other service providers, including roles and relationships of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates, and conflicts of interest;

•

the governance of the Funds;

•

the Funds’ brokerage practices;

•

the share classes offered by the Funds;

•

the purchase, redemption and pricing of Fund shares; and

•

the application of U.S. federal income tax laws.

Investors may find this information important and helpful. If you have any questions about the Funds, please call Columbia Funds at 800.345.6611 or contact your financial advisor.

Before reading the SAI, you should consult the Glossary below, which defines certain of the terms used in the SAI.

Glossary


1933 Act		Securities Act of 1933, as amended

1934 Act		Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended

1940 Act		Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended

Administration Agreement		The administration agreement between the Trust, on behalf of the Funds, and the Administrator

Administrator		Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC

Adviser		Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC

Advisory Agreement		The investment advisory agreement between the Trust, on behalf of the Funds, and the Adviser

Ameriprise Financial		Ameriprise Financial, Inc.

Bank of America		Bank of America Corporation

BFDS/DST		Boston Financial Data Services, Inc./DST Systems, Inc.

Board		The Trust’s Board of Trustees

CMOs		Collateralized mortgage obligations

Code		Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended


Codes of Ethics		The codes of ethics adopted by the Board pursuant to Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act

Columbia Acorn Funds, the Fund(s) or a Fund		One or more of the open-end management investment companies listed on the front cover of this SAI that are series of the Trust

Columbia Funds Complex		The fund complex that is comprised of the open-end investment management companies advised by the Adviser or its affiliates and principally underwritten by Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc., as that term is defined under Form N-1A, including the Columbia Funds Family

Columbia Funds Family		The fund complex that is comprised of the open-end investment management companies advised by the Adviser or its affiliates and principally underwritten by Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc., including funds using the Columbia, RiverSource, Threadneedle and Seligman brands

Columbia Funds		The funds using the Columbia, RiverSource, Seligman and Threadneedle brands, including the Columbia Acorn Funds, within the Columbia Funds Family

Columbia Management		Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC

Columbia WAM		Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC, the Adviser and the Administrator

Custodian		JPMorgan

Distributor		Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc.

Distribution Agreement		The distribution agreement between the Trust, on behalf of the Funds, and the Distributor

Distribution Plan(s)		One or more of the plans adopted by the Board pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act for the distribution of the Funds’ shares

FDIC		Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation

Fitch		Fitch Investors Service, Inc.

FNMA		Federal National Mortgage Association

The Fund(s) or a Fund		One or more of the open-end management investment companies listed on the front cover of this SAI that are series of the Trust

Fund(s) of Funds		One or more of the “funds of funds” in the Columbia Funds Family

GNMA		Government National Mortgage Association

GSAL		Goldman Sachs Agency Lending, the Funds’ securities lending agent

Independent Trustee(s)		The Trustee(s) of the Board who are not “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the 1940 Act

Interested Trustee(s)		The Trustee(s) of the Board who are “interested persons” of the Funds as defined in the 1940 Act


International/Global Equity Fund(s)		One or more of the international/global equity funds in the Columbia Funds Family

IRS		United States Internal Revenue Service

JPMorgan		JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.

LIBOR		London Interbank Offered Rate

Moody’s		Moody’s Investors Service, Inc.

NASDAQ		National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations system

NRSRO		Nationally recognized statistical ratings organization (such as Moody’s, Fitch or S&P)

NSCC		National Securities Clearing Corporation

NYSE		New York Stock Exchange

Principal Underwriter		Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc.

REIT		Real estate investment trust

REMIC		Real estate mortgage investment conduit

RIC		A “regulated investment company,” as such term is used in the Code

S&P		Standard & Poor’s Corporation, “Standard & Poor’s” and “S&P” are trademarks of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. and have been licensed for use by the Adviser. The Columbia Funds are not sponsored, endorsed, sold or promoted by Standard & Poor’s and Standard & Poor’s makes no representation regarding the advisability of investing in the Columbia Funds.

SAI		This Statement of Additional Information

SEC		United States Securities and Exchange Commission

Selling Agent(s)		One or more of the banks, broker/dealers or other financial institutions that have entered into a sales support agreement with the Distributor

Servicing Agent(s)		One or more of the banks, broker/dealers or other financial institutions that have entered into a shareholder servicing agreement with the Distributor

State Street		State Street Bank and Trust Company, the custodian of the Columbia Acorn Funds prior to July 22, 2011

Sub-Administrator		Columbia Management

Transfer Agency Agreement		The transfer agency agreement between the Trust, on behalf of the Funds, and Columbia Management Investment Services Corp.

Transfer Agent		Columbia Management Investment Services Corp.

The Trust		Columbia Acorn Trust, the open-end registered investment company to which this SAI relates

Trustee(s)		One or more of the Board’s Trustees

ABOUT THE TRUST

The Trust is a registered investment company under the 1940 Act within the Columbia Funds Family.

The Trust was organized as a Massachusetts business trust on April 21, 1992 as successor to The Acorn Fund, Inc., which became the Columbia Acorn series of Funds. Prior to October 13, 2003, the Trust was named Liberty Acorn Trust, and prior to September 29, 2000, it was named Acorn Investment Trust.

Each of the Funds is a series of the Trust and has a fiscal year end of December 31^st.

The Funds offer the following classes of shares:

Class A

Class C

Class I

Class Z

Columbia Acorn European Fund

Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund

The Trust is not required to hold annual meetings of shareholders, but special meetings may be called for certain purposes. The Trust voluntarily adheres to certain governance measures contemplated by the SEC’s Order in the matter of Columbia Management Advisors, Inc. and Columbia Funds Distributor, Inc. (former service providers to the Funds), dated February 9, 2005 (the “SEC Order”), designed to maintain the independence of the Board, including holding a meeting of shareholders to elect trustees at least every five years. The last such meeting was held on May 27, 2010. Shareholders receive one vote for each Fund share held. Shares of each Fund and any other series of the Trust that may be in existence from time to time generally vote together, except when required by law to vote separately by Fund or by class. Shareholders owning in the aggregate 10 percent or more of Trust shares may call meetings to consider removal of Trustees of the Trust. Under certain circumstances, the Trust will provide information to assist shareholders in calling such a meeting.

ABOUT THE FUNDS’ INVESTMENTS

The investment objective, principal investment strategies (i.e., as used in this SAI and the corresponding prospectuses, a strategy which generally involves the ability to invest 10% or more of a Fund’s total assets) and related principal investment risks for each Fund are discussed in each Fund’s prospectuses.

Certain Investment Activity Limits

The overall investment and other activities of the Adviser and its affiliates may limit the investment opportunities for each Fund in certain markets where limitations are imposed by regulators upon the amount of investment by affiliated investors, in the aggregate or in individual issuers. From time to time, each Fund’s activities also may be restricted because of regulatory restrictions applicable to the Adviser and its affiliates and/or because of their internal policies. See Investment Advisory and Other Services — Other Roles and Relationships of Ameriprise Financial and its Affiliates — Certain Conflicts of Interest.

Fundamental and Non-Fundamental Investment Policies

The following discussion of “fundamental” and “non-fundamental” investment policies and limitations for each Fund supplements the discussion of investment policies in the Fund’s prospectuses. A fundamental policy may be changed only with Board and shareholder approval. A non-fundamental policy may be changed by the Board and does not require shareholder approval, but may require notice to shareholders in certain instances.

Unless otherwise noted, whenever an investment policy or limitation states a maximum percentage of a Fund’s assets that may be invested in any security or other asset, or sets forth a policy regarding an investment standard, compliance with such percentage limitation or standard will be determined solely at the time of the Fund’s acquisition of such security or asset. Borrowings and other instruments that may give rise to leverage and the restriction on investing in illiquid securities are monitored on an ongoing basis.

Fundamental Investment Policies

The 1940 Act provides that a “vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities” means the affirmative vote of the lesser of (1) more than 50% of the outstanding shares of a Fund, or (2) 67% or more of the shares present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding shares are represented at the meeting in person or by proxy. The following fundamental investment policies cannot be changed without such a vote.

Columbia Acorn European Fund may not, as a matter of fundamental policy:

1. With respect to 75% of the value of the Fund’s total assets, invest more than 5% of its total assets (valued at time of investment) in securities of a single issuer, except securities issued or guaranteed by the government of the U.S. or any of its agencies or instrumentalities;

2. Acquire securities of any one issuer that at the time of investment (a) represent more than 10% of the voting securities of the issuer or (b) have a value greater than 10% of the value of the outstanding securities of the issuer;

3. Invest more than 25% of its total assets (valued at time of investment) in securities of companies in any one industry;

4. Make loans, but this restriction shall not prevent the Fund from (a) investing in debt securities, (b) investing in repurchase agreements, or (c) lending its portfolio securities, provided that it may not lend securities if, as a result, the aggregate value of all securities loaned would exceed 33% of its total assets (valued at the time of such loan);

5. Borrow money except (a) from banks for temporary or emergency purposes in amounts not exceeding 33% of the value of the Fund’s total assets (valued at the time of such borrowing) and (b) in connection with transactions in options, futures and options on futures. The Fund will not purchase additional securities when its borrowings, less amounts receivable on sales of portfolio securities, exceed 5% of its total assets;

6. Underwrite the distribution of securities of other issuers; however the Fund may acquire “restricted” securities which, in the event of a resale, might be required to be registered under the 1933 Act on the ground that the Fund could be regarded as an underwriter as defined by the 1933 Act with respect to such resale;

7. Purchase and sell real estate or interests in real estate, although it may invest in marketable securities of enterprises that invest in real estate or interests in real estate;

8. Purchase and sell commodities or commodity contracts, except that it may enter into (a) futures and options on futures and (b) forward contracts;

9. Make margin purchases of securities, except for use of such short-term credits as are needed for clearance of transactions and except in connection with transactions in options, futures and options on futures;

10. Issue any senior security except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act.

Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund may not, as a matter of fundamental policy:

3. Invest more than 25% of its total assets (valued at time of investment) in securities of companies in any one industry;

7. Purchase and sell real estate or interests in real estate, although it may invest in marketable securities of enterprises that invest in real estate or interests in real estate;

8. Purchase and sell commodities or commodity contracts, except that it may enter into (a) futures and options on futures and (b) forward contracts;

10. Issue any senior security except to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act.

Non-Fundamental Investment Policies

Columbia Acorn European Fund, as a matter of non-fundamental policy, may not:

1. Under normal circumstances, invest less than 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in European companies. For purposes of these non-fundamental policies, the Fund may invest in a company if (i) it is domiciled in, or the principal trading market for its securities is in, a European country, (ii) it derives 50% or more of its economic value from goods produced, sales made or services performed in a European country or has at least 50% of its assets in a European country or (iii) it is a holding company that predominately holds shares in such companies. The Fund will notify shareholders at least 60 days prior to any change in this policy;

2. Under normal circumstances, invest less than 70% of its total assets in companies in Western European countries (for example, the United Kingdom, Germany, France and Italy), or more than 30% of its total assets in companies in emerging Central and Eastern European countries (for example, Poland, the Czech Republic, Turkey and Cyprus), including up to 10% of its total assets in companies in Russia and the Ukraine;

3. Invest more than 10% of its total assets (valued at the time of investment) in securities of domestic issuers;

4. Acquire securities of other registered investment companies except in compliance with the 1940 Act;

5. Invest in companies for the purpose of management or the exercise of control;

6. Invest more than 15% of its net assets (valued at time of investment) in illiquid securities, including repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days;

7. Make short sales of securities unless the Fund owns at least an equal amount of such securities, or owns securities that are convertible or exchangeable, without payment of further consideration, into at least an equal amount of such securities; or

8. Pledge, mortgage or hypothecate its assets, except as may be necessary in connection with permitted borrowings or in connection with short sales, options, futures and options on futures.

Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund, as a matter of non-fundamental policy, may not:

1. Under normal circumstances, invest less than 80% of its net assets (plus any borrowings for investment purposes) in companies located in emerging market countries, including frontier market countries. Emerging market countries are those countries whose economies are developing or emerging from underdevelopment (for example, China, India, Poland and Turkey). Frontier emerging market countries generally have smaller economies and even less developed capital markets than traditional emerging market countries (for example, Vietnam, Columbia, Nigeria and Kazakhstan). For purposes of this non-fundamental policy, the Fund may invest in a company if (i) it is domiciled in, or the principal trading market for its securities is in, an emerging market country, (ii) it derives 50% or more of its economic value from goods produced, sales made or services performed or has at least 50% of its assets in an emerging market country or countries or (iii) it is a holding company that predominantly holds shares in such companies. The Fund will notify shareholders at least 60 days prior to any change in this policy;

2. Invest more than 10% of its total assets (valued at the time of investment) in securities of domestic issuers;

3. Acquire securities of other registered investment companies except in compliance with the 1940 Act;

4. Invest in companies for the purpose of management or the exercise of control;

5. Invest more than 15% of its net assets (valued at time of investment) in illiquid securities, including repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days;

6. Make short sales of securities unless the Fund owns at least an equal amount of such securities, or owns securities that are convertible or exchangeable, without payment of further consideration, into at least an equal amount of such securities; or

7. Pledge, mortgage or hypothecate its assets, except as may be necessary in connection with permitted borrowings or in connection with short sales, options, futures and options on futures.

Permissible Investments and Related Risks

Each Fund’s prospectuses identify and summarize the individual types of securities in which the Fund invests as part of its principal investment strategies and the principal risks associated with such investments.

The table below identifies for each Fund certain types of securities in which it is permitted to invest, including those described in each Fund’s prospectuses. A Fund generally has the ability to invest 10% or more of its total assets in each type of security described in its prospectuses (and in each sub-category of such security type described in this SAI). To the extent that a type of security identified below for a Fund is not described in the Fund’s prospectuses (or as a sub-category of such security type in this SAI), the Fund generally invests less than 10% of its total assets in such security type.

Information about individual types of securities (including certain of their associated risks) in which the Funds may invest is set forth below. Each Fund’s investment in these types of securities is subject to its investment objective and fundamental and non-fundamental investment policies.

Temporary Defensive Positions. Each Fund may temporarily invest in money market instruments or hold cash. It may do so without limit, when the Adviser: (i) believes that the market conditions are not favorable for profitable investing; (ii) is unable to locate favorable investment opportunities; or (iii) determines that a temporary defensive position is advisable or necessary in order to meet anticipated redemption requests, or for other reasons. While a Fund engages in such strategies, it may not achieve its investment objective. The Adviser currently expects that substantially all of each Fund’s assets will be invested in accordance with its principal investment strategies. As a result, the Funds expect to remain substantially exposed to the equity markets.

See also About the Funds’ Investments — Permissible Investments and Related Risks — Money Market Instruments on page 31.

Permissible Fund Investments


Investment Type	Acorn European Fund	Acorn Emerging Markets Fund
Asset-Backed Securities	ü	ü
Bank Obligations (Domestic and Foreign)	ü	ü
Common Stock	ü	ü
Convertible Securities	ü	ü
Corporate Debt Securities	ü	ü
Custody Receipts and Trust Certificates	ü	ü
Derivatives
Index or Linked Securities (Structured Products)	ü	ü
Futures Contracts and Options on Futures Contracts	ü	ü


Investment Type	Acorn European Fund	Acorn Emerging Markets Fund
Stock Options and Stock Index Options	ü	ü
Swap Agreements	ü	ü
Foreign Currency Transactions	ü	ü
Foreign Securities	ü	ü
Illiquid Securities	ü	ü
Initial Public Offerings	ü	ü
Investments in other Investment Companies	ü	ü
Low and Below Investment Grade Securities	ü	ü
Money Market Instruments	ü	ü
Participation Interests	ü	ü
Preferred Stock	ü	ü
Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities	ü	ü
Real Estate Investment Trusts and Master Limited Partnerships	ü	ü
Repurchase Agreements	ü	ü
Reverse Repurchase Agreements	ü	ü
Stripped Securities	ü	ü
U.S. Government and Related Obligations	ü	ü
Warrants and Rights	ü	ü
When-Issued, Delayed Delivery and Forward Commitment Transactions	ü	ü
Zero-Coupon, Pay-in-Kind and Step-Coupon Securities	ü	ü

Asset-Backed Securities

Asset-backed securities represent interests in, or debt instruments that are backed by, pools of various types of assets that generate cash payments generally over fixed periods of time. Such securities entitle the security holders to receive distributions that are tied to the payments made on the underlying assets (less fees paid to the originator, servicer, or other parties, and fees paid for credit enhancement), so that the payments made on the underlying assets effectively pass through to such security holders. Asset-backed securities typically are created by an originator of loans or owner of accounts receivable that sells such underlying assets to a special purpose entity in a process called a securitization. The special purpose entity issues securities that are backed by the payments on the underlying assets, and have a minimum denomination and specific term. Asset-backed securities may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating-rate obligations or as zero coupon, pay-in-kind or step-coupon securities and may be privately placed or publicly offered. See Permissible Fund Investments — Zero Coupon, Pay-in-Kind and Step-Coupon Securities and Permissible Investments — Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities for more information.

Investing in asset-backed securities is subject to certain risks. For example, the value of asset-backed securities may be affected by, among other factors, changes in: interest rates, the market’s assessment of the quality of underlying assets, the creditworthiness of the servicer for the underlying assets, information concerning the originator of the underlying assets, or the creditworthiness or rating of the entities that provide any supporting letters of credit, surety bonds, derivative instruments, or other credit enhancement. The value of asset-backed securities also will be affected by the exhaustion, termination or expiration of any credit enhancement.

Declining or low interest rates may lead to a more rapid rate of repayment on the underlying assets, resulting in accelerated payments on asset-backed securities that then would be reinvested at a lesser rate of interest. Rising or high interest rates tend to lead to a slower rate of repayment on the underlying assets, resulting in slower than expected payments on asset-backed securities that can, in turn, lead to a decline in value. The impact of changing interest rates on the value of asset-backed securities may be difficult to predict and result in greater volatility. Holders of asset-backed securities generally have no recourse against the originator of the underlying assets in the

event of a default on the underlying assets. Credit risk is the risk that a holder of securities, backed by pools of receivables such as mortgage loans, may not receive all or part of its principal because the issuer, any credit enhancer and/or an underlying obligor has defaulted on its obligations. Credit risk is increased for asset-backed securities that are subordinated to another security (i.e., if the holder of an asset-backed security is entitled to receive payments only after payment obligations to holders of the other security are satisfied). The more deeply subordinated the security, the greater the credit risk associated with the security will be.

Bank Obligations (Domestic and Foreign)

Bank obligations include certificates of deposit, bankers’ acceptances, time deposits and promissory notes that earn a specified rate of return and may be issued by (i) a domestic branch of a domestic bank, (ii) a foreign branch of a domestic bank, (iii) a domestic branch of a foreign bank or (iv) a foreign branch of a foreign bank. Bank obligations may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating-rate obligations.

Certificates of deposit, or so-called CDs, typically are interest-bearing debt instruments issued by banks and have maturities ranging from a few weeks to several years. Bankers’ acceptances are time drafts drawn on and accepted by banks, are a customary means of effecting payment for merchandise sold in import-export transactions and are a general source of financing. Yankee dollar certificates of deposit are negotiable CDs issued in the United States by branches and agencies of foreign banks. Eurodollar certificates of deposit are CDs issued by foreign (mainly European) banks with interest and principal paid in U.S. dollars. Such CDs typically have maturities of less than two years and have interest rates that typically are pegged to the London Interbank Offered Rate or LIBOR. A time deposit can be either a savings account or CD that is an obligation of a financial institution for a fixed term. Typically, there are penalties for early withdrawals of time deposits. Promissory notes are written commitments of the maker to pay the payee a specified sum of money either on demand or at a fixed or determinable future date, with or without interest.

Bank investment contracts are issued by banks. Pursuant to such contracts, a Fund may make cash contributions to a deposit fund of a bank. The bank then credits to the Fund payments at floating or fixed interest rates. A Fund also may hold funds on deposit with its custodian for temporary purposes.

Investing in bank obligations is subject to certain risks. Certain bank obligations, such as some CDs, are insured by the FDIC up to certain specified limits. Many other bank obligations, however, are neither guaranteed nor insured by the FDIC or the U.S. Government. These bank obligations are “backed” only by the creditworthiness of the issuing bank or parent financial institution. Domestic and foreign banks are subject to different governmental regulation. Accordingly, certain obligations of foreign banks, including Eurodollar and Yankee dollar obligations, involve different investment risks than those affecting obligations of domestic banks, including, among others, the possibilities that: (i) their liquidity could be impaired because of political or economic developments; (ii) the obligations may be less marketable than comparable obligations of domestic banks; (iii) a foreign jurisdiction might impose withholding and other taxes at high levels on interest income; (iv) foreign deposits may be seized or nationalized; (v) foreign governmental restrictions such as exchange controls may be imposed, which could adversely affect the payment of principal or interest on those obligations; (vi) there may be less publicly available information concerning foreign banks issuing the obligations; and (vii) the reserve requirements and accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards, practices and requirements applicable to foreign banks may differ from those applicable to domestic banks. Foreign banks generally are not subject to examination by any U.S. Government agency or instrumentality.

Common Stock

Common stock represents a unit of equity ownership of a corporation. Owners typically are entitled to vote on the selection of directors and other important corporate governance matters, and to receive dividend payments, if any, on their holdings. However, ownership of common stock does not entitle owners to participate in the day-to-day operations of the corporation. Common stocks of domestic and foreign public corporations can

be listed, and their shares traded, on domestic stock exchanges, such as the NYSE or the NASDAQ Stock Market. Domestic and foreign corporations also may have their shares traded on foreign exchanges, such as the London Stock Exchange or Tokyo Stock Exchange. Common stock may be privately placed or publicly offered. See Permissible Fund Investments — Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities for more information.

Under normal conditions, the common stock investments of the Funds (as a percent of total assets) are allocated as follows:


	U.S. Companies Maximum	Foreign Companies Maximum
Fund
Columbia European Fund	up to 10%	no limit
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund	up to 10%	no limit

Investing in common stocks is subject to certain risks. Stock market risk, for example, is the risk that the value of such stocks, like the broader stock markets, may decline over short or even extended periods of time, perhaps substantially or unexpectedly. Domestic and foreign stock markets tend to be cyclical, with periods when stock prices generally rise and periods when stock prices generally decline. The value of individual stocks will rise and fall based on factors specific to each company, such as changes in earnings or management, as well as general economic and market factors.

If a corporation is liquidated, the claims of secured and unsecured creditors and owners of debt securities and “preferred” stock take priority over the claims of those who own common stock.

Investing in common stocks also poses risks applicable to the particular type of company issuing the common stock. For example, stocks of smaller companies tend to have greater price swings than stocks of larger companies because, among other things, they trade less frequently and in lower volumes, are more susceptible to changes in economic conditions, may be more reliant on singular products or services and are more vulnerable to larger competitors. Common stocks of these types of companies may have a higher potential for gains, but also may be subject to greater risk of loss.

Investing in common stocks also poses risks applicable to a particular industry, such as technology, financial services, consumer goods or natural resources (e.g., oil and gas). To some extent, the prices of common stocks tend to move by industry sector. When market conditions favorably affect, or are expected to favorably affect, an industry, the share prices of the common stocks of companies in that industry tend to rise. Conversely, negative news or a poor outlook for a particular industry can cause the share prices of the common stocks of companies in that industry to decline quickly.

Convertible Securities

Convertible securities include bonds, debentures, notes, preferred stocks or other securities that may be converted or exchanged (by the holder or by the issuer) into shares of the underlying common stock (or cash or securities of equivalent value) at a stated exchange ratio or predetermined price (the conversion price). As such, convertible securities combine the investment characteristics of debt securities and equity securities. A holder of convertible securities is entitled to receive the income of a bond, debenture or note or the dividend of a preferred stock until the conversion privilege is exercised. The market value of convertible securities generally is a function of, among other factors, interest rates, the rates of return of similar nonconvertible securities and the financial strength of the issuer. The market value of convertible securities tends to decline as interest rates rise and, conversely, to rise as interest rates decline. However, a convertible security’s market value tends to reflect the market price of the common stock of the issuing company when that stock price approaches or is greater than its conversion price. As the market price of the underlying common stock declines, the price of the convertible security tends to be influenced more by the rate of return of the convertible security. Because both interest rate

and market movements can influence their value, convertible securities generally are not as sensitive to changes in interest rates as similar debt securities nor generally are they as sensitive to changes in share price as their underlying common stock. Convertible securities may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating-rate obligations or as zero-coupon, pay-in-kind and step-coupon securities and may be privately placed or publicly offered. See Permissible Fund Investments — Zero-Coupon, Pay-in-Kind and Step-Coupon Securities and Permissible Fund Investments — Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities for more information.

Investing in convertible securities is subject to certain risks. Certain convertible securities, particularly securities that are convertible into securities of an issuer other than the issuer of the convertible security, may be illiquid and, therefore, may be more difficult to resell in a timely fashion or for a fair price, which could result in investment losses. Certain convertible securities may have a mandatory conversion feature, pursuant to which the securities convert automatically into common stock or other equity securities (of the same or a different issuer) at a specified date and a specified exchange ratio. Certain convertible securities may be convertible at the option of the issuer, which may require a holder to convert the security into the underlying common stock, even at times when the value of the underlying common stock or other equity security has declined substantially.

In addition, some convertible securities may be rated below investment grade or may not be rated and, therefore, may be considered speculative investments. Companies that issue convertible securities frequently are small- and mid-capitalization companies and, accordingly, carry the risks associated with such companies. In addition, the credit rating of a company’s convertible securities generally is lower than that of its conventional debt securities. Convertible securities are senior to equity securities and have a claim to the assets of an issuer prior to the holders of the issuer’s common stock in the event of liquidation but generally are subordinate to similar non-convertible debt securities of the same issuer. Some convertible securities are particularly sensitive to changes in interest rates when their predetermined conversion price is much higher than the price for the issuing company’s common stock.

Corporate Debt Securities

Corporate debt securities are fixed income securities typically issued by businesses to finance their operations. Notes, bonds, debentures and commercial paper are the most common types of corporate debt securities, with the primary difference being their interest rates, maturity dates and secured or unsecured status. Commercial paper has the shortest term and usually is unsecured. The broad category of corporate debt securities includes debt issued by domestic or foreign companies of all kinds, including those with small-, mid- and large-capitalizations. The category also includes bank loans, as well as assignments, participations and other interests in bank loans. Corporate debt securities may be rated investment grade or below investment grade and may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating-rate obligations or as zero-coupon, pay-in-kind or step-coupon securities and may be privately placed or publicly offered. See Permissible Fund Investments — Zero-Coupon, Pay-in-Kind and Step-Coupon Securities and Permissible Fund Investments — Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities for more information.

Extendible commercial notes (ECNs) are very similar to commercial paper except that with ECNs, the issuer has the option to extend the notes’ maturity. ECNs are issued at a discount rate, with an initial redemption of not more than 90 days from the date of issue. If ECNs are not redeemed by the issuer on the initial redemption date, the issuer will pay a premium (step-up) rate based on the ECN’s credit rating at the time.

Because of the wide range of types and maturities of corporate debt securities, as well as the range of creditworthiness of issuers, corporate debt securities can have widely varying risk/return profiles. For example, commercial paper issued by a large established domestic corporation that is rated by an NRSRO as investment grade may have a relatively modest return on principal but present relatively limited risk. On the other hand, a long-term corporate note issued, for example, by a small foreign corporation from an emerging market country that has not been rated by an NRSRO may have the potential for relatively large returns on principal but carries a relatively high degree of risk.

Investing in corporate debt securities is subject to certain risks including, among others, credit and interest rate risk. Credit risk is the risk that a Fund could lose money if the issuer of a corporate debt security is unable to pay interest or repay principal when it becomes due. Some corporate debt securities that are rated below investment grade by an NRSRO generally are considered speculative because they present a greater risk of loss, including default, than higher quality debt securities. The credit risk of a particular issuer’s debt security may vary based on its priority for repayment. For example, higher ranking (senior) debt securities have a higher priority than and, therefore, may be paid in full before, lower ranking (subordinated) securities. In addition, in the event of bankruptcy, holders of higher-ranking senior securities may receive amounts otherwise payable to the holders of more junior securities. Interest rate risk is the risk that the value of certain corporate debt securities will tend to fall when interest rates rise. In general, corporate debt securities with longer terms tend to fall more in value when interest rates rise than do corporate debt securities with shorter terms.

Custody Receipts and Trust Certificates

Custody receipts and trust certificates are derivative products that evidence direct ownership in a pool of securities. Typically, a sponsor will deposit a pool of securities with a custodian in exchange for custody receipts evidencing interests in those securities. The sponsor generally then will sell the custody receipts or trust certificates in negotiated transactions at varying prices. Each custody receipt or trust certificate evidences the individual securities in the pool and the holder of a custody receipt or trust certificate generally will have all the rights and privileges of owners of those securities.

Investing in custody receipts and trust certificates is subject to certain risks. Custody receipts and trust certificates generally are subject to the same risks as the securities evidenced by the receipts or certificates. Custody receipts and trust certificates also may be less liquid than the underlying securities.

Derivatives

General

Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are based on (or “derived” from) traditional securities (such as a stock or a bond), assets (such as a commodity, like gold), reference rates (such as LIBOR) or market indices (such as the S&P 500^® Index). Some forms of derivatives, such as exchange-traded futures and options on securities, commodities, or indices, are traded on regulated exchanges. These types of derivatives are standardized contracts that can easily be bought and sold, and whose market values are determined and published daily. Non-standardized derivatives, on the other hand, tend to be more specialized or complex, and may be harder to value. Derivatives afford leverage and, when used properly, can enhance returns and be useful in hedging portfolios. Some common types of derivatives include futures; options; options on futures; forward foreign currency exchange contracts; forward contracts on securities and securities indices; linked securities and structured products; CMOs; stripped securities; warrants; swap agreements and swaptions.

A Fund may use derivatives for a variety of reasons, including, for example: (i) to enhance its return; (ii) to attempt to protect against possible changes in the market value of securities held in or to be purchased for its portfolio resulting from securities markets or currency exchange rate fluctuations (i.e., to hedge); (iii) to protect its unrealized gains reflected in the value of its portfolio securities; (iv) to facilitate the sale of such securities for investment purposes; (v) to reduce transaction costs; and/or (vi) to manage the effective maturity or duration of its portfolio.

A Fund’s use of derivatives presents risks different from, and possibly greater than, the risks associated with investing directly in traditional securities. The use of derivatives can lead to losses because of adverse movements in the price or value of the underlying security, asset, index or reference rate, which may be magnified by certain features of the derivatives. These risks are heightened when a Fund uses derivatives to enhance its return or as a substitute for a position or security, rather than solely to hedge or offset the risk of a

position or security held by a Fund. There is also a risk that the derivative will not correlate well with the security for which it is substituting. A Fund’s use of derivatives to leverage risk also may exaggerate a loss, potentially causing a Fund to lose more money than if it had invested in the underlying security, or limit a potential gain. The success of management’s derivative strategies will depend on its ability to assess and predict the impact of market or economic developments on the underlying security, asset, index or reference rate and the derivative itself, without necessarily the benefit of observing the performance of the derivative under all possible market conditions. Other risks arise from a Fund’s potential inability to terminate or sell its derivative positions as a liquid secondary market for such positions may not exist at times when a Fund may wish to terminate or sell them. Over-the-counter instruments (investments not traded on an exchange) may be illiquid. Derivatives traded in the over-the-counter market are subject to the risk that the other party will not meet its obligations. Also, with some derivative strategies there is the risk that a Fund may not be able to find a suitable derivative transaction counterparty, and thus may be unable to invest in derivatives altogether. The use of derivatives may also increase the amount and accelerate the timing of taxes payable by shareholders.

A Fund may use any or all of the above investment techniques and may purchase different types of derivative instruments at any time and in any combination. There is no particular strategy that dictates the use of one technique over another, as the use of derivatives is a function of numerous variables, including market conditions.

Index or Linked Securities (Structured Products)

General. Indexed or linked securities, also often referred to as “structured products,” are instruments that may have varying combinations of equity and debt characteristics. These instruments are structured to recast the investment characteristics of the underlying security or reference asset. If the issuer is a unit investment trust or other special purpose vehicle, the structuring will typically involve the deposit with or purchase by such issuer of specified instruments (such as commercial bank loans or securities) and/or the execution of various derivative transactions, and the issuance by that entity of one or more classes of securities (structured securities) backed by, or representing interests in, the underlying instruments. The cash flow on the underlying instruments may be apportioned among the newly issued structured securities to create securities with different investment characteristics, such as varying maturities, payment priorities and interest rate provisions, and the extent of such payments made with respect to structured securities is dependent on the extent of the cash flow on the underlying instruments.

Indexed and Inverse Floating Rate Securities. A Fund may invest in securities that provide a potential return based on a particular index of value or interest rates. For example, a Fund may invest in securities that pay interest based on an index of interest rates. The principal amount payable upon maturity of certain securities also may be based on the value of the index. To the extent a Fund invests in these types of securities, a Fund’s return on such securities will rise and fall with the value of the particular index: that is, if the value of the index falls, the value of the indexed securities owned by a Fund will fall. Interest and principal payable on certain securities may also be based on relative changes among particular indices.

A Fund may also invest in so-called “inverse floaters” or “residual interest bonds” on which the interest rates vary inversely with a floating rate (which may be reset periodically by a dutch auction, a remarketing agent, or by reference to a short-term tax-exempt interest rate index). A Fund may purchase synthetically-created inverse floating rate bonds evidenced by custodial or trust receipts. Generally, income on inverse floating rate bonds will decrease when interest rates increase, and will increase when interest rates decrease. Such securities have the effect of providing a degree of investment leverage, since they may increase or decrease in value in response to changes, as an illustration, in market interest rates at a rate that is a multiple of the rate at which fixed-rate securities increase or decrease in response to such changes. As a result, the market values of such securities will generally be more volatile than the market values of fixed-rate securities. To seek to limit the volatility of these securities, a Fund may purchase inverse floating obligations that have shorter-term maturities or that contain limitations on the extent to which the interest rate may vary. Certain investments in such

obligations may be illiquid. A Fund may invest in indexed and inverse securities for hedging purposes or to seek to increase returns. When used for hedging purposes, indexed and inverse securities involve correlation risk. Furthermore, where such a security includes a contingent liability, in the event of an adverse movement in the underlying index or interest rate, a Fund may be required to pay substantial additional margin to maintain the position.

Credit Linked Securities. Among the income producing securities in which a Fund may invest are credit linked securities. The issuers of these securities frequently are limited purpose trusts or other special purpose vehicles that, in turn, invest in a derivative instrument or basket of derivative instruments, such as credit default swaps, interest rate swaps and other securities, in order to provide exposure to certain fixed income markets. For instance, a Fund may invest in credit linked securities as a cash management tool in order to gain exposure to a certain market and/or to remain fully invested when more traditional income producing securities are not available.

Like an investment in a bond, investments in these credit linked securities represent the right to receive periodic income payments (in the form of distributions) and payment of principal at the end of the term of the security. However, these payments are conditioned on or linked to the issuer’s receipt of payments from, and the issuer’s potential obligations to, the counterparties to the derivative instruments and other securities in which the issuer invests. For instance, the issuer may sell one or more credit default swaps, under which the issuer would receive a stream of payments over the term of the swap agreements provided that no event of default has occurred with respect to the referenced debt obligation upon which the swap is based. If a default occurs, the stream of payments may stop and the issuer would be obligated to pay the counterparty the par (or other agreed upon value) of the referenced debt obligation. This, in turn, would reduce the amount of income and/or principal that a Fund would receive. A Fund’s investments in these instruments are indirectly subject to the risks associated with derivative instruments, including, among others, credit risk, default or similar event risk, counterparty risk, interest rate risk, leverage risk and management risk. These securities generally are exempt from registration under the 1933 Act. Accordingly, there may be no established trading market for the securities and they may constitute illiquid investments.

Index-, Commodity-, Currency- and Equity-Linked Securities. “Index-linked” or “commodity-linked” notes are debt securities of companies that call for interest payments and/or payment at maturity in different terms than the typical note where the borrower agrees to make fixed interest payments and to pay a fixed sum at maturity. Principal and/or interest payments on an index-linked or commodity-linked note depend on the performance of one or more market indices, such as the S&P 500^® Index, a weighted index of commodity futures such as crude oil, gasoline and natural gas or the market prices of a particular commodity or basket of commodities. Equity-linked securities are short-term or intermediate term instruments having a value at maturity and/or interest rate determined by reference to the market prices of one or more equity securities. At maturity, the principal amount of an equity-linked debt security is often exchanged for common stock of the issuer or is payable in an amount based on the issuer’s common stock price at the time of maturity. Currency-linked debt securities are short-term or intermediate-term instruments having a value at maturity, and/or an interest rate, determined by reference to one or more foreign currencies. Payment of principal or periodic interest may be calculated as a multiple of the movement of one currency against another currency, or against an index.

Index, commodity, currency and equity-linked securities may entail substantial risks. Such instruments may be subject to significant price volatility. The company issuing the instrument may fail to pay the amount due on maturity. The underlying investment or security may not perform as expected by the Adviser. Markets, underlying securities and indexes may move in a direction that was not anticipated by the Adviser. Performance of the derivatives may be influenced by interest rate and other market changes in the United States and abroad, and certain derivative instruments may be illiquid.

Linked securities are often issued by unit investment trusts. Examples of this include such index-linked securities as S&P Depositary Receipts (SPDRs), which is an interest in a unit investment trust holding a portfolio

of securities linked to the S&P 500^® Index, and a type of exchange traded fund (ETF). Because a unit investment trust is an investment company under the 1940 Act, a Fund’s investments in SPDRs are subject to the limitations set forth in Section 12(d)(1)(A) of the 1940 Act. SPDRs closely track the underlying portfolio of securities, trade like a share of common stock and pay periodic dividends proportionate to those paid by the portfolio of stocks that comprise the S&P 500^® Index. As a holder of interests in a unit investment trust, a Fund would indirectly bear its ratable share of that unit investment trust’s expenses. At the same time, a Fund would continue to pay its own management and advisory fees and other expenses, as a result of which a Fund and its shareholders in effect would be absorbing higher levels of fees with respect to investments in such unit investment trusts.

Equity-linked securities include issues such as Structured Yield Product Exchangeable for Stock (STRYPES), Trust Automatic Common Exchange Securities (TRACES), Trust Issued Mandatory Exchange Securities (TIMES), and Trust Enhanced Dividend Securities (TRENDS). The issuers of these equity-linked securities generally purchase and hold a portfolio of stripped U.S. Treasury securities maturing on a quarterly basis through the conversion date, and a forward purchase contract with an existing shareholder of the company relating to the common stock. Quarterly distributions on such equity-linked securities generally consist of the cash received from the U.S. Treasury securities and such equity-linked securities generally are not entitled to any dividends that may be declared on the common stock.

Investing in structured products and linked securities is subject to certain risks. Because structured products typically involve no credit enhancement, their credit risk generally will be equivalent to that of the underlying instruments. Investments in structured products may be structured as a class that is either subordinated or unsubordinated to the right of payment of another class. Subordinated structured products typically have higher rates of return and present greater risks than unsubordinated structured products. Structured products sometimes are sold in private placement transactions and often have a limited trading market.

Investments in “linked” securities have the potential to lead to significant losses because of unexpected movements in the underlying financial asset, index, currency or other investment. The ability of a Fund to utilize linked-securities successfully will depend on its ability correctly to predict pertinent market movements, which cannot be assured. Because currency-linked securities usually relate to foreign currencies, some of which may be currencies from emerging market countries, there are certain additional risks associated with such investments.

SPDRs are subject to the risks of an investment in a broadly based portfolio of common stocks, including the risk that the general level of stock prices may decline, thereby adversely affecting the value of such investment. In addition, because individual investments in SPDRs are not redeemable, except upon termination of the unit investment trust, the liquidity of small holdings of SPDRs will depend upon the existence of a secondary market. Large holdings of SPDRs are called “creation unit size” and are redeemable in-kind only and are not redeemable for cash from the unit investment trust. The price of a SPDR is derived from and based upon the securities held by the unit investment trust. Accordingly, the level of risk involved in the purchase or sale of a SPDR is similar to the risk involved in the purchase or sale of traditional common stock, with the exception that the pricing mechanism for SPDRs is based on a basket of stocks. Disruptions in the markets for the securities underlying SPDRs purchased or sold by a Fund could result in losses on SPDRs.

Futures Contracts and Options on Futures Contracts

Futures Contracts. A futures contract sale creates an obligation by the seller to deliver the type of security or other asset called for in the contract at a specified delivery time for a stated price. A futures contract purchase creates an obligation by the purchaser to take delivery of the type of security or other asset called for in the contract at a specified delivery time for a stated price. The specific security or other asset delivered or taken at the settlement date is not determined until on or near that date. The determination is made in accordance with the rules of the exchange on which the futures contract was made. A Fund may enter into futures contracts which are traded on national or foreign futures exchanges and are standardized as to maturity date and underlying security or other asset. Futures exchanges and trading in the United States are regulated under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), a U.S. Government agency.

Traders in futures contracts may be broadly classified as either “hedgers” or “speculators.” Hedgers use the futures markets primarily to offset unfavorable changes (anticipated or potential) in the value of securities or other assets currently owned or expected to be acquired by them. Speculators less often own the securities or other assets underlying the futures contracts which they trade, and generally use futures contracts with the expectation of realizing profits from fluctuations in the value of the underlying securities or other assets. Pursuant to a notice of eligibility claiming exclusion from the definition of commodity pool operator filed with the CFTC and the National Futures Association on behalf of the Funds, neither the Trust nor any of the individual Funds is deemed to be a “commodity pool operator” under the CEA, and, accordingly, they are not subject to registration or regulation as such under the CEA.

Upon entering into futures contracts, in compliance with the SEC’s requirements, cash or liquid securities, equal in value to the amount of a Fund’s obligation under the contract (less any applicable margin deposits and any assets that constitute “cover” for such obligation), will be segregated with a Fund’s custodian.

Unlike when a Fund purchases or sells a security, no price is paid or received by a Fund upon the purchase or sale of a futures contract, although a Fund is required to deposit with its custodian in a segregated account in the name of the futures broker an amount of cash and/or U.S. Government securities in order to initiate and maintain open positions in futures contracts. This amount is known as “initial margin.” The nature of initial margin in futures transactions is different from that of margin in security transactions, in that futures contract margin does not involve the borrowing of funds by a Fund to finance the transactions. Rather, initial margin is in the nature of a performance bond or good faith deposit intended to assure completion of the contract (delivery or acceptance of the underlying security or other asset) that is returned to a Fund upon termination of the futures contract, assuming all contractual obligations have been satisfied. Minimum initial margin requirements are established by the relevant futures exchange and may be changed. Brokers may establish deposit requirements which are higher than the exchange minimums. Futures contracts are customarily purchased and sold on margin which may range upward from less than 5% of the value of the contract being traded. Subsequent payments, called “variation margin,” to and from the broker (or the custodian) are made on a daily basis as the price of the underlying security or other asset fluctuates, a process known as “marking to market.” If the futures contract price changes to the extent that the margin on deposit does not satisfy margin requirements, payment of additional variation margin will be required. Conversely, a change in the contract value may reduce the required margin, resulting in a repayment of excess margin to the contract holder. Variation margin payments are made for as long as the contract remains open. A Fund expects to earn interest income on its margin deposits.

Although futures contracts by their terms call for actual delivery or acceptance of securities or other assets (stock index futures contracts or futures contracts that reference other intangible assets do not permit delivery of the referenced assets), the contracts usually are closed out before the settlement date without the making or taking of delivery. A Fund may elect to close some or all of its futures positions at any time prior to their expiration. The purpose of taking such action would be to reduce or eliminate the position then currently held by a Fund. Closing out an open futures position is done by taking an opposite position (“buying” a contract which has previously been “sold,” “selling” a contract previously “purchased”) in an identical contract (i.e., the same aggregate amount of the specific type of security or other asset with the same delivery date) to terminate the position. Final determinations are made as to whether the price of the initial sale of the futures contract exceeds or is below the price of the offsetting purchase, or whether the purchase price exceeds or is below the offsetting sale price. Final determinations of variation margin are then made, additional cash is required to be paid by or released to a Fund, and a Fund realizes a loss or a gain. Brokerage commissions are incurred when a futures contract is bought or sold.

Successful use of futures contracts by a Fund is subject to the Adviser’s ability to predict correctly movements in the direction of interest rates and other factors affecting securities and commodities markets. This requires different skills and techniques than those required to predict changes in the prices of individual securities. A Fund, therefore, bears the risk that future market trends will be incorrectly predicted.

The risk of loss in trading futures contracts in some strategies can be substantial, due both to the relatively low margin deposits required and the potential for an extremely high degree of leverage involved in futures contracts. As a result, a relatively small price movement in a futures contract may result in an immediate and substantial loss to the investor. For example, if at the time of purchase, 10% of the value of the futures contract is deposited as margin, a subsequent 10% decrease in the value of the futures contract would result in a total loss of the margin deposit, before any deduction for the transaction costs, if the account were then closed out. A 15% decrease would result in a loss equal to 150% of the original margin deposit if the contract were closed out. Thus, a purchase or sale of a futures contract may result in losses in excess of the amount posted as initial margin for the contract.

In the event of adverse price movements, a Fund would continue to be required to make daily cash payments in order to maintain its required margin. In such a situation, if a Fund has insufficient cash, it may have to sell portfolio securities in order to meet daily margin requirements at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so. The inability to close the futures position also could have an adverse impact on the ability to hedge effectively.

To reduce or eliminate a hedge position held by a Fund, a Fund may seek to close out a position. The ability to establish and close out positions will be subject to the development and maintenance of a liquid secondary market. It is not certain that this market will develop or continue to exist for a particular futures contract, which may limit a Fund’s ability to realize its profits or limit its losses. Reasons for the absence of a liquid secondary market on an exchange include the following: (i) there may be insufficient trading interest in certain contracts; (ii) restrictions may be imposed by an exchange on opening transactions, closing transactions or both; (iii) trading halts, suspensions or other restrictions may be imposed with respect to particular classes or series of contracts, or underlying securities; (iv) unusual or unforeseen circumstances, such as volume in excess of trading or clearing capability, may interrupt normal operations on an exchange; (v) the facilities of an exchange or a clearing corporation may not at all times be adequate to handle current trading volume; or (vi) one or more exchanges could, for economic or other reasons, decide or be compelled at some future date to discontinue the trading of contracts (or a particular class or series of contracts), in which event the secondary market on that exchange (or in the class or series of contracts) would cease to exist, although outstanding contracts on the exchange that had been issued by a clearing corporation as a result of trades on that exchange would continue to be exercisable in accordance with their terms.

Interest Rate Futures Contracts. Bond prices are established in both the cash market and the futures market. In the cash market, bonds are purchased and sold with payment for the full purchase price of the bond being made in cash, generally within five business days after the trade. In the futures market, a contract is made to purchase or sell a bond in the future for a set price on a certain date. Historically, the prices for bonds established in the futures markets have tended to move generally in the aggregate in concert with the cash market prices and have maintained fairly predictable relationships. Accordingly, a Fund may use interest rate futures contracts as a defense, or hedge, against anticipated interest rate changes. A Fund presently could accomplish a similar result to that which it hopes to achieve through the use of interest rate futures contracts by selling bonds with long maturities and investing in bonds with short maturities when interest rates are expected to increase, or conversely, selling bonds with short maturities and investing in bonds with long maturities when interest rates are expected to decline. However, because of the liquidity that is often available in the futures market, the protection is more likely to be achieved, perhaps at a lower cost and without changing the rate of interest being earned by a Fund, through using futures contracts.

Interest rate futures contracts are traded in an auction environment on the floors of several exchanges – principally, the Chicago Board of Trade, the Chicago Mercantile Exchange and the New York Futures Exchange. Each exchange guarantees performance under contract provisions through a clearing corporation, a nonprofit organization managed by the exchange membership. A public market exists in futures contracts covering various financial instruments including long term U.S. Treasury Bonds and Notes; GNMA modified pass-through mortgage backed securities; three-month U.S. Treasury Bills; and ninety-day commercial paper. A Fund may also invest in exchange-traded Eurodollar contracts, which are interest rate futures on the forward level of LIBOR. These contracts are generally considered liquid securities and trade on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Such Eurodollar contracts are generally used to “lock-in” or hedge the future level of short-term rates.

A Fund may trade in any interest rate futures contracts for which there exists a public market, including, without limitation, the foregoing instruments.

Index Futures Contracts. An index futures contract is a contract to buy or sell units of an index at a specified future date at a price agreed upon when the contract is made. Entering into a contract to buy units of an index is commonly referred to as buying or purchasing a contract or holding a long position in the index. Entering into a contract to sell units of an index is commonly referred to as selling a contract or holding a short position in the index. A unit is the current value of the index. A Fund may enter into stock index futures contracts, debt index futures contracts, or other index futures contracts appropriate to its objective(s).

There are several risks in connection with the use by a Fund of index futures as a hedging device. One risk arises because of the imperfect correlation between movements in the prices of the index futures and movements in the prices of securities which are the subject of the hedges. The Adviser will attempt to reduce this risk by selling, to the extent possible, futures on indices the movements of which will, in its judgment, have a significant correlation with movements in the prices of a Fund’s portfolio securities sought to be hedged.

Options on Futures Contracts. A Fund may purchase and write call and put options on those futures contracts that it is permitted to buy or sell. A Fund may use such options on futures contracts in lieu of writing options directly on the underlying securities or other assets or purchasing and selling the underlying futures contracts. Such options generally operate in the same manner as options purchased or written directly on the underlying investments. A futures option gives the holder, in return for the premium paid, the right to buy from (call) or sell to (put) the writer of the option a futures contract at a specified price at any time during the period of the option. Upon exercise, the writer of the option is obligated to pay the difference between the cash value of the futures contract and the exercise price. Like the buyer or seller of a futures contract, the holder or writer of an option has the right to terminate its position prior to the scheduled expiration of the option by selling or purchasing an option of the same series, at which time the person entering into the closing purchase transaction will realize a gain or loss. There is no guarantee that such closing purchase transactions can be effected.

A Fund will enter into written options on futures contracts only when, in compliance with the SEC’s requirements, cash or liquid securities equal in value to the underlying security’s or other asset’s value (less any applicable margin deposits) have been deposited in a segregated account. A Fund will be required to deposit initial margin and maintenance margin with respect to put and call options on futures contracts written by it pursuant to brokers’ requirements similar to those described above.

Investments in futures options involve some of the same risks that are involved in connection with investments in futures contracts (for example, the existence of a liquid secondary market). In addition, the purchase of an option also entails the risk that changes in the value of the underlying futures contract will not be fully reflected in the value of the option purchased. There may be circumstances when the purchase of a call or put option on a futures contract would result in a loss to a Fund when the purchase or sale of a futures contract would not, such as when there is no movement in the prices of the hedged investments. In general, the market prices of options can be expected to be more volatile than the market prices on the underlying futures contracts. Compared to the purchase or sale of futures contracts, however, the purchase of call or put options on futures contracts may frequently involve less potential risk to a Fund because the maximum amount at risk is the premium paid for the options (plus transaction costs).

Successful use of index futures by a Fund is also subject to the Adviser’s ability to predict correctly movements in the direction of the market. It is possible that, for example, where a Fund has sold futures to hedge its portfolio against a decline in the market, the index on which the futures are written may advance and the value of securities held in a Fund’s portfolio may decline. If this occurred, a Fund would lose money on the futures and also experience a decline in the value of its portfolio securities, as a Fund’s ability to effectively hedge all or a portion of the securities in its portfolio, in anticipation of or during a market decline, through transactions in futures or put options on stock indices, depends on the degree to which price movements in the underlying index correlate with the price movements of the securities held by a Fund. Inasmuch as a Fund’s securities will not

duplicate the components of an index, the correlation will not be perfect. Consequently, a Fund bears the risk that the prices of its securities being hedged will not move to the same extent as do the prices of its put options on the stock indices. It is also possible that, if a Fund has hedged against the possibility of a decline in the market adversely affecting securities held in its portfolio and securities prices increase instead, a Fund will lose part or all of the benefit of the increased values of those securities that it has hedged, because it will have offsetting losses in its futures positions. In addition, in such situations, if a Fund has insufficient cash, it may have to sell securities to meet daily variation margin requirements.

In addition to the possibility that there may be an imperfect correlation, or no correlation at all, between movements in the index futures and the securities of the portfolio being hedged, the prices of index futures may not correlate perfectly with movements in the underlying index due to certain market distortions. First, all participants in the futures markets are subject to margin deposit and maintenance requirements. Rather than meeting additional margin deposit requirements, investors may close futures contracts through offsetting transactions, which would distort the normal relationship between the index and futures markets. Second, margin requirements in the futures market are less onerous than margin requirements in the securities market, and as a result, the futures market may attract more speculators than the securities market. Increased participation by speculators in the futures market may also cause temporary price distortions. Due to the possibility of price distortions in the futures market, and also because of the imperfect correlation between movements in an index and movements in the prices of index futures, even a correct forecast of general market trends by the Adviser may still not result in a successful hedging transaction.

There is also the risk of loss by a Fund of margin deposits in the event of bankruptcy of a broker with whom a Fund has an open position in a futures contract or related option. Most futures exchanges limit the amount of fluctuation permitted in some contract prices during a single trading day. The daily limit establishes the maximum amount that the price of a futures contract may vary either up or down from the previous day’s settlement price at the end of a trading session. Once the daily limit has been reached in a particular type of contract, no trades may be made on that day at a price beyond that limit. The daily limit governs only price movement during a particular trading day and, therefore, does not limit potential losses, because the limit may prevent the liquidation of unfavorable positions. Futures contract prices have occasionally moved to the daily limit for several consecutive trading days with little or no trading, thereby preventing prompt liquidation of futures positions and subjecting some futures traders to substantial losses.

Options on Index Futures Contracts. A Fund may also purchase and sell options on index futures contracts. Options on index futures give the purchaser the right, in return for the premium paid, to assume a position in an index futures contract (a long position if the option is a call and a short position if the option is a put), at a specified exercise price at any time during the period of the option. Upon exercise of the option, the delivery of the futures position by the writer of the option to the holder of the option will be accompanied by delivery of the accumulated balance in the writer’s futures margin account, which represents the amount by which the market price of the index futures contract, at exercise, exceeds (in the case of a call) or is less than (in the case of a put) the exercise price of the option on the index future. If an option is exercised on the last trading day prior to the expiration date of the option, the settlement will be made entirely in cash equal to the difference between the exercise price of the option and the closing level of the index on which the future is based on the expiration date. Purchasers of options who fail to exercise their options prior to the exercise date suffer a loss of the premium paid.

There are various risks in connection with the use by a Fund of index futures as a hedging device. For example, a risk arises because of the imperfect correlation between movements in the prices of the index futures and movements in the prices of securities which are the subject of the hedges. The Adviser will attempt to reduce this risk by selling, to the extent possible, futures on indices the movements of which will, in its judgment, have a significant correlation with movements in the prices of a Fund’s portfolio securities sought to be hedged; there can be no assurance that the Adviser will be successful in doing so.

Stock Options and Stock Index Options

A Fund may purchase and write (i.e., sell) put and call options. Such options may relate to particular stocks or stock indices, and may or may not be listed on a domestic or foreign securities exchange and may or may not be issued by the Options Clearing Corporation (OCC). Stock index options are put options and call options on various stock indices. In most respects, they are identical to listed options on common stocks.

There is a key difference between stock options and stock index options in connection with their exercise. In the case of stock options, the underlying security, common stock, is delivered. However, upon the exercise of an index option, settlement does not occur by delivery of the securities comprising the index. The option holder who exercises the index option receives an amount of cash if the closing level of the stock index upon which the option is based is greater than (in the case of a call) or less than (in the case of a put) the exercise price of the option. This amount of cash is equal to the difference between the closing price of the stock index and the exercise price of the option expressed in dollars times a specified multiple. A stock index fluctuates with changes in the market value of the securities included in the index. For example, some stock index options are based on a broad market index, such as the S&P 500^® Index or a narrower market index, such as the S&P 100^® Index. Indices may also be based on an industry or market segment.

The successful use of a Fund’s options strategies depends on the ability of the Adviser to forecast interest rate and market movements correctly. When it purchases an option, a Fund runs the risk that it will lose its entire investment in the option in a relatively short period of time, unless a Fund exercises the option or enters into a closing sale transaction for such option during the life of the option. If the price of the underlying security does not rise (in the case of a call) or fall (in the case of a put) to an extent sufficient to cover the option premium and transaction costs, a Fund will lose part or all of its investment in the option. This contrasts with an investment by a Fund in the underlying securities, since a Fund may continue to hold its investment in those securities notwithstanding the lack of a change in price of those securities.

The effective use of options also depends on a Fund’s ability to terminate option positions at times when the Adviser deems it desirable to do so. Although a Fund will take an option position only if the Adviser believes there is a liquid secondary market for the option, there is no assurance that a Fund will be able to effect closing transactions at any particular time or at an acceptable price.

If a secondary trading market in options were to become unavailable, a Fund could no longer engage in closing transactions. The writer in such circumstances would be subject to the risk of market decline or appreciation in the instrument during such period. If an option purchased by a Fund expires unexercised, a Fund will realize a loss equal to the premium paid. Reasons for the absence of a liquid secondary market on an exchange include the following: (i) there may be insufficient trading interest in certain options; (ii) restrictions may be imposed by an exchange on opening transactions or closing transactions or both; (iii) trading halts, suspensions or other restrictions may be imposed with respect to particular classes or series of options, or underlying securities; (iv) unusual or unforeseen circumstances, such as volume in excess of trading or clearing capability, may interrupt normal operations on an exchange; (v) the facilities of an exchange or a clearing corporation may not at all times be adequate to handle current trading volume; or (vi) one or more exchanges could, for economic or other reasons, decide or be compelled at some future date to discontinue the trading of options (or a particular class or series of options), in which event the secondary market on that exchange (or in the class or series of options) would cease to exist, although outstanding options on the exchange that had been issued by a clearing corporation as a result of trades on that exchange would continue to be exercisable in accordance with their terms.

Disruptions in the markets for the securities underlying options purchased or sold by a Fund could result in losses on the options. If trading is interrupted in an underlying security, the trading of options on that security is normally halted as well. As a result, a Fund as purchaser or writer of an option will be unable to close out its positions until options trading resumes, and it may be faced with losses if trading in the security reopens at a substantially different price. In addition, the OCC or other options markets may impose exercise restrictions. If a prohibition on exercise is imposed at a time when trading in the option has also been halted, a Fund as purchaser

or writer of an option will be locked into its position until one of the two restrictions has been lifted. If a prohibition on exercise remains in effect until an option owned by a Fund has expired, a Fund could lose the entire value of its option.

Special risks are presented by internationally traded options. Because of time differences between the United States and various foreign countries, and because different holidays are observed in different countries, foreign options markets may be open for trading during hours or on days when U.S. markets are closed. As a result, option premiums may not reflect the current prices of the underlying interest in the United States.

Dealer (Over-the-Counter) Options. Dealer options are options negotiated individually through dealers rather than traded on an exchange. Certain risks are specific to dealer options. While a Fund might look to a clearing corporation to exercise exchange-traded options, if a Fund purchases a dealer option it must rely on the selling dealer to perform if a Fund exercises the option. Failure by the dealer to do so would result in the loss of the premium paid by a Fund as well as loss of the expected benefit of the transaction. Exchange-traded options generally have a continuous liquid market while dealer options more often may not. Consequently, a Fund can realize the value of a dealer option it has purchased only by exercising or reselling the option to the issuing dealer. Similarly, when a Fund writes a dealer option, a Fund can close out the option prior to its expiration only by entering into a closing purchase transaction with the dealer. While each Fund seeks to enter into dealer options only with dealers who will agree to and can enter into closing transactions with a Fund, no assurance exists that a Fund will at any time be able to liquidate a dealer option at a favorable price at any time prior to expiration. Unless a Fund, as a covered dealer call option writer, can effect a closing purchase transaction, it will not be able to liquidate securities (or other assets) used as cover until the option expires or is exercised. In the event of insolvency of the other party, a Fund may be unable to liquidate a dealer option. With respect to options written by a Fund, the inability to enter into a closing transaction may result in material losses to a Fund. For example, because a Fund must maintain a secured position with respect to any call option on a security it writes, a Fund may not sell the assets that it has segregated to secure the position while it is obligated under the option. This requirement may impair a Fund’s ability to sell portfolio securities at a time when such sale might be advantageous.

A Fund generally will treat purchased dealer options as illiquid securities. A Fund may treat the cover used for written dealer options as liquid if the dealer agrees that a Fund may repurchase the dealer option it has written for a maximum price to be calculated by a predetermined formula. In such cases, the dealer option would be considered illiquid only to the extent the maximum purchase price under the formula exceeds the intrinsic value of the option.

Writing Covered Options. A Fund may write covered call options and covered put options on securities held in its portfolio when, in the opinion of the Adviser, such transactions are consistent with a Fund’s investment goal and policies. Call options written by a Fund give the purchaser the right to buy the underlying securities from a Fund at the stated exercise price at any time prior to the expiration date of the option, regardless of the security’s market price; put options give the purchaser the right to sell the underlying securities to a Fund at the stated exercise price at any time prior to the expiration date of the option, regardless of the security’s market price.

A Fund may write only covered options, which means that, so long as a Fund is obligated as the writer of a call option, it will own the underlying securities subject to the option (or comparable securities satisfying the cover requirements of securities exchanges). In the case of put options, a Fund will hold cash and/or high-grade short-term debt obligations equal to the price to be paid if the option is exercised. In addition, a Fund will be considered to have covered a put or call option if and to the extent that it holds an option that offsets some or all of the risk of the option it has written. A Fund may write combinations of covered puts and calls (straddles) on the same underlying security.

A Fund will receive a premium from writing a put or call option, which increases a Fund’s return on the underlying security if the option expires unexercised or is closed out at a profit. The amount of the premium reflects, among other things, the relationship between the exercise price and the current market value of the

underlying security, the volatility of the underlying security, the amount of time remaining until expiration, current interest rates, and the effect of supply and demand in the options market and in the market for the underlying security. By writing a call option, a Fund limits its opportunity to profit from any increase in the market value of the underlying security above the exercise price of the option but continues to bear the risk of a decline in the value of the underlying security. By writing a put option, a Fund assumes the risk that it may be required to purchase the underlying security for an exercise price higher than the security’s then-current market value, resulting in a potential capital loss unless the security subsequently appreciates in value.

A Fund’s obligation to sell an instrument subject to a call option written by it, or to purchase an instrument subject to a put option written by it, may be terminated prior to the expiration date of the option by a Fund’s execution of a closing purchase transaction, which is effected by purchasing on an exchange an offsetting option of the same series (i.e., same underlying instrument, exercise price and expiration date) as the option previously written. A closing purchase transaction will ordinarily be effected in order to realize a profit on an outstanding option, to prevent an underlying instrument from being called, to permit the sale of the underlying instrument or to permit the writing of a new option containing different terms on such underlying instrument. A Fund realizes a profit or loss from a closing purchase transaction if the cost of the transaction (option premium plus transaction costs) is less or more than the premium received from writing the option. Because increases in the market price of a call option generally reflect increases in the market price of the security underlying the option, any loss resulting from a closing purchase transaction may be offset in whole or in part by unrealized appreciation of the underlying security.

If a Fund writes a call option but does not own the underlying security, and when it writes a put option, a Fund may be required to deposit cash or securities with its broker as “margin” or collateral for its obligation to buy or sell the underlying security. As the value of the underlying security varies, a Fund may also have to deposit additional margin with the broker. Margin requirements are complex and are fixed by individual brokers, subject to minimum requirements currently imposed by the Federal Reserve Board and by stock exchanges and other self-regulatory organizations.

Purchasing Put Options. A Fund may purchase put options to protect its portfolio holdings in an underlying security against a decline in market value. Such hedge protection is provided during the life of the put option since a Fund, as holder of the put option, is able to sell the underlying security at the put exercise price regardless of any decline in the underlying security’s market price. For a put option to be profitable, the market price of the underlying security must decline sufficiently below the exercise price to cover the premium and transaction costs. By using put options in this manner, a Fund will reduce any profit it might otherwise have realized from appreciation of the underlying security by the premium paid for the put option and by transaction costs.

Purchasing Call Options. A Fund may purchase call options to hedge against an increase in the price of securities that a Fund wants ultimately to buy. Such hedge protection is provided during the life of the call option since a Fund, as holder of the call option, is able to buy the underlying security at the exercise price regardless of any increase in the underlying security’s market price. In order for a call option to be profitable, the market price of the underlying security must rise sufficiently above the exercise price to cover the premium and transaction costs. These costs will reduce any profit a Fund might have realized had it bought the underlying security at the time it purchased the call option.

Over-the-Counter (OTC) Options. A Fund will enter into OTC options transactions only with primary dealers in U.S. Government securities and, in the case of OTC options written by a Fund, only pursuant to agreements that will assure that a Fund will at all times have the right to repurchase the option written by it from the dealer at a specified formula price. A Fund will treat the amount by which such formula price exceeds the amount, if any, by which the option may be “in-the-money” as an illiquid investment. It is the present policy of a Fund not to enter into any OTC option transaction if, as a result, more than 15% (10% in some cases, refer to a Fund’s prospectuses) of a Fund’s net assets would be invested in (i) illiquid investments (determined under the foregoing formula) relating to OTC options written by a Fund, (ii) OTC options purchased by a Fund, (iii) securities which are not readily marketable, and (iv) repurchase agreements maturing in more than seven days.

Index Options. As an alternative to purchasing call and put options on index futures, a Fund may purchase call and put options on the underlying indices themselves. Such options could be used in a manner identical to the use of options on index futures. Options involving securities indices provide the holder with the right to make or receive a cash settlement upon exercise of the option based on movements in the relevant index. Such options must be listed on a national securities exchange and issued by the OCC. Such options may relate to particular securities or to various stock indices, except that a Fund may not write covered options on an index.

Foreign Stock Index Options. A Fund may, for the purpose of hedging its portfolio, subject to applicable securities regulations, purchase and write put and call options on foreign stock indices listed on foreign and domestic stock exchanges.

Swap Agreements

Swap agreements are derivative instruments that can be individually negotiated and structured to include exposure to a variety of different types of investments or market factors. Depending on their structure, swap agreements may increase or decrease a Fund’s exposure to long- or short-term interest rates, foreign currency values, mortgage securities, corporate borrowing rates, or other factors such as security prices or inflation rates. A Fund may enter into a variety of swap agreements, including interest rate, index, commodity, equity, credit default and currency exchange rate swap agreements, and other types of swap agreements such as caps, collars and floors. A Fund also may enter into swaptions, which are options to enter into a swap agreement.

In a typical interest rate swap, one party agrees to make regular payments equal to a floating interest rate times a “notional principal amount,” in return for payments equal to a fixed rate times the same amount, for a specified period of time. If a swap agreement provides for payments in different currencies, the parties might agree to exchange notional principal amount as well. In a total return swap agreement, the non-floating rate side of the swap is based on the total return of an individual security, a basket of securities, an index or another reference asset. Swaps may also depend on other prices or rates, such as the value of an index or mortgage prepayment rates.

In a typical cap or floor agreement, one party agrees to make payments only under specified circumstances, usually in return for payment of a fee by the other party. For example, the buyer of an interest rate cap obtains the right to receive payments to the extent that a specified interest rate exceeds an agreed-upon level, while the seller of an interest rate floor is obligated to make payments to the extent that a specified interest rate falls below an agreed-upon level. Caps and floors have an effect similar to buying or writing options. A collar combines elements of buying a cap and selling a floor.

Swap agreements will tend to shift a Fund’s investment exposure from one type of investment to another. For example, if a Fund agreed to pay fixed rates in exchange for floating rates while holding fixed-rate bonds, the swap would tend to decrease a Fund’s exposure to long-term interest rates. Another example is if a Fund agreed to exchange payments in dollars for payments in foreign currency, the swap agreement would tend to decrease a Fund’s exposure to U.S. interest rates and increase its exposure to foreign currency and interest rates.

Swap agreements are sophisticated hedging instruments that typically involve a small investment of cash relative to the magnitude of risks assumed. As a result, swaps can be highly volatile and may have a considerable impact on a Fund’s performance. Depending on how they are used, swap agreements may increase or decrease the overall volatility of a Fund’s investments and its share price and yield. Additionally, whether a Fund’s use of swap agreements will be successful in furthering its investment objective will depend on the Adviser’s ability correctly to predict whether certain types of investments likely are to produce greater returns than other investments. Because they are two party contracts and because they may have terms of greater than seven days, swap agreements may be considered to be illiquid. Moreover, a Fund bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received under a swap agreement in the event of the default or bankruptcy of a swap agreement counterparty. The most significant factor in the performance of swap agreements is the change in the specific interest rate, currency, or other factor that determines the amounts of payments due to and from a Fund. If a swap

agreement calls for payments by a Fund, a Fund must be prepared to make such payments when due. In addition, if the counterparty’s creditworthiness declines, the value of a swap agreement likely would decline, potentially resulting in losses for a Fund. A Fund will closely monitor the credit of a swap agreement counterparty in order to attempt to minimize this risk. A Fund may also suffer losses if it is unable to terminate outstanding swap agreements (either by assignment or other disposition) or reduce its exposure through offsetting transactions (i.e., by entering into an offsetting swap agreement with the same party or a similarly creditworthy party).

Credit Default Swap Agreements. A Fund may enter into credit default swap agreements, which may have as reference obligations one or more securities or a basket of securities that are or are not currently held by a Fund. The protection “buyer” in a credit default contract is generally obligated to pay the protection “seller” an upfront or a periodic stream of payments over the term of the contract provided that no credit event, such as a default, on a reference obligation has occurred. If a credit event occurs, the seller generally must pay the buyer the “par value” (full notional value) of the swap in exchange for an equal face amount of deliverable obligations of the reference entity described in the swap, or the seller may be required to deliver the related net cash amount, if the swap is cash settled. A Fund may be either the buyer or seller in the transaction. If a Fund is a buyer and no credit event occurs, a Fund may recover nothing if the swap is held through its termination date. However, if a credit event occurs, the buyer generally may elect to receive the full notional value of the swap in exchange for an equal face amount of deliverable obligations of the reference entity whose value may have significantly decreased. As a seller, a Fund generally receives an upfront payment or a fixed rate of income throughout the term of the swap provided that there is no credit event. As the seller, a Fund would effectively add leverage to its portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, a Fund would be subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap.

Credit default swap agreements may involve greater risks than if a Fund had invested in the reference obligation directly since, in addition to risks relating to the reference obligation, credit default swaps are subject to illiquidity risk, counterparty risk and credit risk. A Fund will enter into credit default swap agreements generally with counterparties that meet certain standards of creditworthiness. A buyer generally will lose its investment and recover nothing if no credit event occurs and the swap is held to its termination date. If a credit event were to occur, the value of any deliverable obligation received by the seller, coupled with the upfront or periodic payments previously received, may be less than the full notional value it pays to the buyer, resulting in a loss of value to the seller.

Equity Swaps. A Fund may engage in equity swaps. Equity swaps allow the parties to the swap agreement to exchange components of return on one equity investment (e.g., a basket of equity securities or an index) for a component of return on another non-equity or equity investment, including an exchange of differential rates of return. Equity swaps may be used to invest in a market without owning or taking physical custody of securities in circumstances where direct investment may be restricted for legal reasons or is otherwise impractical. Equity swaps also may be used for other purposes, such as hedging or seeking to increase total return.

The values of equity swaps can be very volatile. To the extent that the Adviser does not accurately analyze and predict the potential relative fluctuation on the components swapped with the other party, a Fund may suffer a loss. The value of some components of an equity swap (such as the dividend on a common stock) may also be sensitive to changes in interest rates. Furthermore, during the period a swap is outstanding, a Fund may suffer a loss if the counterparty defaults.

Total Return Swap Agreements. Total return swap agreements are contracts in which one party agrees to make periodic payments to another party based on the change in market value of the assets underlying the contract, which may include a specified security, basket of securities or securities indices during the specified period, in return for periodic payments based on a fixed or variable interest rate or the total return from other underlying assets. Total return swap agreements may be used to obtain exposure to a security or market without owning or taking physical custody of such security or investing directly in such market. Total return swap agreements may effectively add leverage to a Fund’s portfolio because, in addition to its total net assets, a Fund would be subject to investment exposure on the notional amount of the swap.

Total return swap agreements are subject to the risk that a counterparty will default on its payment obligations to a Fund thereunder, and conversely, that a Fund will not be able to meet its obligation to the counterparty. Generally, a Fund will enter into total return swaps on a net basis (i.e., the two payment streams are netted against one another with a Fund receiving or paying, as the case may be, only the net amount of the two payments). The net amount of the excess, if any, of a Fund’s obligations over its entitlements with respect to each total return swap will be accrued on a daily basis, and an amount of liquid assets having an aggregate net asset value at least equal to the accrued excess will be segregated by a Fund. If the total return swap transaction is entered into on other than a net basis, the full amount of a Fund’s obligations will be accrued on a daily basis, and the full amount of a Fund’s obligations will be segregated by a Fund in an amount equal to or greater than the market value of the liabilities under the total return swap agreement or the amount it would have cost a Fund initially to make an equivalent direct investment, plus or minus any amount a Fund is obligated to pay or is to receive under the total return swap agreement.

Variance, Volatility and Correlation Swap Agreements. Variance and volatility swaps are contracts that provide exposure to increases or decreases in the volatility of certain referenced assets. Correlation swaps are contracts that provide exposure to increases or decreases in the correlation between the prices of different assets or different market rates.

Foreign Currency Transactions

Foreign currency transactions may be used to protect, to some extent, against uncertainty in the level of future currency exchange rates by establishing a fixed exchange rate. Foreign currency transactions may involve the purchase or sale of foreign currencies on a “spot” (cash) basis at the prevailing exchange rate or may involve “forward contracts” that allow a Fund to purchase or sell foreign currencies at a future date. The Funds purchase and sell certain foreign currency forward contracts designed to align the Funds more closely with the foreign currency exposures of their primary benchmarks, without the necessity of changes to their equity portfolios. The Funds do not, however, typically engage in hedging of foreign currency risk against the U.S. dollar, though the portfolio manager is not precluded from employing that strategy. Forward contracts may be used for “transaction hedging,” “position hedging” and “cross-hedging.” A Fund may use forward sale contracts to sell an amount of a foreign currency approximating the value of a Fund’s securities denominated in the foreign security when that foreign currency suffers a substantial decline against the U.S. dollar. A Fund may use forward purchase contracts to purchase a foreign currency when it is believed that the U.S. dollar may suffer a substantial decline against the foreign currency. A Fund may use forward contracts to buy or sell a foreign currency or U.S. dollars when the Adviser believes it has exposure to a foreign currency or U.S. dollars which may suffer or enjoy a movement against another foreign currency to which the Fund has exposure or the U.S. dollar. Although these transactions tend to minimize the risk of loss due to a decline in the value of the hedged currency, they also tend to limit any potential gain that might be realized if the value of the hedged currency increases.

Transaction hedging may allow a Fund to “lock in” the U.S. dollar price of a security it has agreed to purchase or sell, or the U.S. dollar equivalent of a dividend or interest rate payment in a foreign currency. A Fund may use transaction hedging to protect itself against a possible loss resulting from an adverse change in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and the applicable foreign currency during the period between the date on which the security is purchased or sold, or on which the dividend or interest payment is declared, and the date on which such payments are made or received.

Position hedging may allow a Fund to protect against an adverse change in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and the applicable foreign currencies in which its portfolio securities are denominated. A Fund may use position hedging when it is believed that the U.S. dollar may suffer a decline against the foreign currency by entering into a forward purchase contract to purchase a currency in which a portfolio position of the Fund is denominated or by purchasing a currency in which the Fund anticipates acquiring a portfolio position for a fixed dollar amount. A Fund will not attempt to hedge all of its foreign portfolio positions.

Cross-hedging may allow a Fund to enter into a forward contract to sell a different foreign currency for a fixed U.S. dollar amount when it is believed that the U.S. dollar value of the currency to be sold pursuant to the forward contract will fall if there is a decline in the U.S. dollar value of the currency in which a Fund’s securities are denominated.

A Fund also may purchase exchange-listed and over-the-counter call and put options on foreign currencies and foreign currency contracts. Options on foreign currencies and foreign currency contracts give the holder a right to buy or sell the underlying foreign currencies or foreign currency contracts for a specified period of time and for a specified amount. The value of an option on foreign currencies or foreign currency contracts reflects the value of an exchange rate, which depends on the relative values of the U.S. dollar and the relevant foreign currency.

Engaging in foreign currency transactions is subject to certain risks. For example, if the value of a foreign currency were to decline against the U.S. dollar, such decline would reduce the dollar value of any securities held by a Fund denominated in that currency. It is impossible to forecast with precision the market value of portfolio securities at the expiration or maturity of a forward or futures contract, which may make it necessary for a Fund to purchase additional foreign currency on the spot market if the market value of the security being hedged is less than the amount of foreign currency a Fund is obligated to deliver at the time a Fund sells the security being hedged. The value of any currency, including the U.S. dollar, may be affected by political and economic factors applicable to the issuer’s country. The exchange rates of currencies also may be affected adversely by governmental actions. Transaction, position and cross-hedging do not eliminate fluctuations in the underlying prices of securities that a Fund owns or intends to purchase or sell and may limit the amount of potential gain that might result from the increase in value of the currency being hedged. Settlement procedures relating to a Fund’s foreign currency transactions may be more complex than those relating to investments in securities of U.S. issuers.

Foreign Securities

Foreign securities include debt, equity and derivative securities that the Adviser determines are “foreign” based on the consideration of an issuer’s domicile, its principal place of business, its primary stock exchange listing, the source of its revenue or other factors. Foreign securities may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating-rate obligations or as zero-coupon, pay-in-kind or step-coupon securities and may be privately placed or publicly offered. See Permissible Fund Investments — Zero-Coupon, Pay-in-Kind and Step-Coupon Securities and Permissible Fund Investments — Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities for more information.

Foreign securities may include depositary receipts, such as American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), European Depositary Receipts (EDRs) and Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs). ADRs are U.S. dollar-denominated receipts issued in registered form by a domestic bank or trust company that evidence ownership of underlying securities issued by a foreign issuer. EDRs are foreign currency-denominated receipts issued in Europe, typically by foreign banks or trust companies and foreign branches of domestic banks, that evidence ownership of foreign or domestic securities. GDRs are receipts structured similarly to ADRs and EDRs and are marketed globally. Depositary receipts will not necessarily be denominated in the same currency as their underlying securities. In general, ADRs, in registered form, are designed for use in the U.S. securities markets, and EDRs, in bearer form, are designed for use in European securities markets. GDRs are tradable both in the United States and in Europe and are designed for use throughout the world. A Fund may invest in depositary receipts through “sponsored” or “unsponsored” facilities. A sponsored facility is established jointly by the issuer of the underlying security and a depositary, whereas a depositary may establish an unsponsored facility without participation by the issuer of the deposited security. Holders of unsponsored depositary receipts generally bear all the costs of such facilities and the depositary of an unsponsored facility frequently is under no obligation to distribute interestholder communications received from the issuer of the deposited security or to pass through voting rights to the holders of such receipts in respect of the deposited securities. The issuers of unsponsored depositary receipts are not obligated to disclose material information in the United States, and, therefore, there may be limited information available regarding such issuers and/or limited correlation between available information and the market value of the depositary receipts.

Due to the potential for foreign withholding taxes, Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) publishes two versions of its indices reflecting the reinvestment of dividends using two different methodologies: gross dividends and net dividends. While both versions reflect reinvested dividends, they differ with respect to the manner in which taxes associated with dividend payments are treated. In calculating the net dividends version, MSCI incorporates reinvested dividends applying the withholding tax rate applicable to foreign non-resident institutional investors that do not benefit from double taxation treaties. The Adviser believes that the net dividends version of MSCI indices better reflects the returns U.S. investors might expect were they to invest directly in the component securities of an MSCI index.

Investing in foreign securities is subject to certain risks. For example, foreign markets can be extremely volatile. Fluctuations in currency exchange rates also may impact the value of foreign securities denominated in foreign currencies or U.S. dollars, without a change in the intrinsic value of those securities. Additionally, the U.S. dollar value of a foreign security tends to decrease when the value of the U.S. dollar rises against the foreign currency in which the security is denominated and tends to increase when the value of the U.S. dollar falls against such currency. A Fund may attempt to minimize the risk from adverse changes in the relationship between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies by purchasing and selling forward foreign currency exchange contracts and foreign currency futures contracts and related options. Foreign securities may be less liquid than domestic securities so that a Fund may, at times, be unable to sell foreign securities at desirable prices. Brokerage commissions, custodial fees and other fees also are generally higher for foreign securities. A Fund may have limited legal recourse in the event of default with respect to certain debt securities issued by foreign governments. In addition, foreign governments may impose potentially confiscatory withholding or other taxes, which would reduce a Fund’s return on these securities. Other risks of investing in foreign securities include: possible delays in the settlement of transactions or in the notification of income; generally less publicly available information about companies; adverse impact of political, social or diplomatic events; possible seizure, expropriation or nationalization of a company or its assets; possible imposition of currency exchange controls; and that foreign companies generally are not subject to accounting, auditing and financial reporting standards comparable to those mandated for domestic companies.

Risks associated with investments in foreign securities are increased with respect to investments in emerging market countries. Political and economic structures in many emerging market countries, especially those in Eastern Europe, the Pacific Basin and the Far East, are undergoing significant evolutionary changes and rapid development, and may lack the social, political and economic stability of more developed countries. Investing in emerging market securities also involves risks beyond the risks applicable to foreign investments. For example, some emerging market countries may have fixed or managed currencies that are not free-floating against the U.S. dollar. Further, certain currencies may not be traded internationally, and some countries with emerging securities markets have sustained long periods of very high inflation or rapid fluctuation in inflation rates which can have negative effects on a country’s economy and securities markets.

Under normal conditions, the Funds’ investments in foreign companies (as a percent of total assets) are allocated as follows:


Fund	Total	Developed Countries	Emerging Markets
Columbia Acorn European Fund	at least 80%	at least 70%	up to 30%
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund	at least 80%	up to 20%	at least 80%

Illiquid Securities

Illiquid securities are defined by a Fund consistent with the SEC staff’s current guidance and interpretations which provide that an illiquid security is an asset which may not be sold or disposed of in the ordinary course of business within seven days at approximately the value at which a Fund has valued the investment on its books. Some securities, such as those not registered under U.S. securities laws, cannot be sold in public transactions. Subject to its investment policies, a Fund may invest in illiquid investments and may invest in certain restricted securities that are deemed to be illiquid securities.

Initial Public Offerings

A Fund may invest in initial public offerings (IPOs) of common stock or other primary or secondary syndicated offerings of equity or debt securities issued by a corporate issuer. A purchase of IPO securities often involves higher transaction costs than those associated with the purchase of securities already traded on exchanges or markets. IPO securities are subject to market risk and liquidity risk. The market value of recently issued IPO securities may fluctuate considerably due to factors such as the absence of a prior public market, unseasoned trading and speculation, a potentially small number of securities available for trading, limited information about the issuer, and other factors. A Fund may hold IPO securities for a period of time, or may sell them soon after the purchase. Investments in IPOs could have a magnified impact — either positive or negative — on a Fund’s performance while the Fund’s assets are relatively small. The impact of an IPO on a Fund’s performance may tend to diminish as the Fund’s assets grow. Under circumstances in which investments in IPOs make a significant contribution to a Fund’s performance, there can be no assurance that similar contributions from IPOs will continue in the future.

Investments in Other Investment Companies

Investing in other investment companies may be a means by which a Fund seeks to achieve its investment objective. A Fund may invest in securities issued by other investment companies within the limits prescribed by the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and any exemptive orders currently or in the future obtained by a Fund from the SEC.

Except with respect to funds structured as funds-of-funds and master-feeder funds, the 1940 Act generally requires that a fund limit its investments in another investment company or series thereof so that, as determined at the time a securities purchase is made: (i) no more than 5% of the value of its total assets will be invested in the securities of any one investment company; (ii) no more than 10% of the value of its total assets will be invested in the aggregate in securities of other investment companies; and (iii) no more than 3% of the outstanding voting stock of any one investment company or series thereof will be owned by a fund or by companies controlled by the fund. Such other investment companies may include exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which are shares of publicly traded unit investment trusts, open-end funds or depositary receipts that seek to track the performance of specific indexes or companies in related industries.

Investing in other investment companies is subject to certain risks. Although a Fund may derive certain advantages from being able to invest in shares of other investment companies, such as to be fully invested, there may be potential disadvantages. Investing in other investment companies may result in higher fees and expenses for a Fund and its shareholders. A shareholder may be charged fees not only on Fund shares held directly but also on the investment company shares that a Fund purchases.

In addition, investing in ETFs is subject to certain other risks. ETFs generally are subject to the same risks as the underlying securities the ETFs are designed to track as well as to the risks of the specific sector or industry to which the ETF relates. ETFs also are subject to the risk that their prices may not totally correlate to the prices of the underlying securities the ETFs are designed to track and the risk of possible trading halts due to market conditions or for other reasons.

Under the 1940 Act and rules and regulations thereunder, a Fund may purchase shares of affiliated funds, subject to certain conditions. Investing in affiliated Funds may present certain actual or potential conflicts of interest. For more information about such actual and potential conflicts of interest, see Investment Advisory and Other Services—Other Roles and Relationships of Ameriprise Financial and its Affiliates—Certain Conflicts of Interest.

Low and Below Investment Grade Securities

Low and below investment grade securities (below investment grade securities are also known as “junk bonds”) are debt securities with the lowest investment grade rating (e.g., BBB by S&P and Fitch or Baa by

Moody’s), that are below investment grade (e.g., lower than BBB by S&P and Fitch or Baa by Moody’s) or that are unrated but determined by the Adviser to be of comparable quality. These types of securities may be issued to fund corporate transactions or restructurings, such as leveraged buyouts, mergers, acquisitions, debt reclassifications or similar events, are more speculative in nature than securities with higher ratings and tend to be more sensitive to credit risk, particularly during a downturn in the economy. These types of securities generally are issued by unseasoned companies without long track records of sales and earnings, or by companies or municipalities that have questionable credit strength. Low and below investment grade securities and comparable unrated securities: (i) likely will have some quality and protective characteristics that, in the judgment of one or more NRSROs, are outweighed by large uncertainties or major risk exposures to adverse conditions; (ii) are speculative with respect to the issuer’s capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation; and (iii) may have a less liquid secondary market, potentially making it difficult to value or sell such securities. Low and below investment grade securities may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating-rate obligations or as zero-coupon, pay-in-kind or step-coupon securities and may be privately placed or publicly offered. See Permissible Fund Investments — Zero-Coupon, Pay-in-Kind and Step-Coupon Securities and Permissible Fund Investments — Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities for more information.

Investing in low and below investment grade securities and comparable unrated securities is subject to certain risks. The rates of return on these types of securities generally are higher than the rates of return available on more highly rated securities, but generally involve greater volatility of price and risk of loss of principal and income, including the possibility of default by or insolvency of the issuers of such securities. Accordingly, a Fund may be more dependent on the Adviser’s credit analysis with respect to these types of securities than is the case for more highly rated securities.

The market values of certain low and below investment grade securities and comparable unrated securities tend to be more sensitive to individual corporate developments and changes in economic conditions than are the market value of more highly rated securities. In addition, issuers of low and below investment grade and comparable unrated securities often are highly leveraged and may not have more traditional methods of financing available to them, so that their ability to service their debt obligations during an economic downturn or during sustained periods of rising interest rates may be impaired.

The risk of loss due to default is greater for low and below investment grade and comparable unrated securities than it is for higher rated securities because low and below investment grade securities and comparable unrated securities generally are unsecured and frequently are subordinated to more senior indebtedness. A Fund may incur additional expenses to the extent that it is required to seek recovery upon a default in the payment of principal or interest on its holdings of such securities. The existence of limited markets for lower-rated debt securities may diminish a Fund’s ability to: (i) obtain accurate market quotations for purposes of valuing such securities and calculating portfolio net asset value (NAV); and (ii) sell the securities at the price at which they are valued by the Fund either to meet redemption requests or to respond to changes in the economy or in financial markets.

Many lower-rated securities are not registered for offer and sale to the public under the 1933 Act. Investments in these restricted securities may be determined to be liquid (able to be sold within seven days at approximately the price at which they are valued by a Fund) pursuant to policies approved by the Board. Restricted securities may be less liquid than other lower-rated securities, potentially making it difficult to value or sell such securities.

Money Market Instruments

Money market instruments are high-quality, short-term debt obligations, which include: (i) bank obligations, including certificates of deposit, time deposits and bankers’ acceptances; (ii) funding agreements; (iii) repurchase agreements; (iv) obligations of the United States, foreign countries and supranational entities, and each of their

subdivisions, agencies and instrumentalities; (v) certain corporate debt securities, such as commercial paper, short-term corporate obligations and extendible commercial notes; (vi) participation interests; and (vii) municipal securities. Money market instruments may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating rate obligations and may be publicly offered or privately placed. See Permissible Fund Investments — Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities for more information.

Investing in money market instruments is subject to certain risks. Money market instruments (other than certain U.S. Government obligations) are not backed or insured by the U.S. Government, its agencies or its instrumentalities. Accordingly, only the creditworthiness of an issuer, or guarantees of that issuer, support such instruments.

Participation Interests

Participation interests (also called pass-through certificates or securities) represent an interest in a pool of debt obligations, such as municipal bonds or notes, that have been “packaged” by an intermediary, such as a bank or broker/dealer. Participation interests typically are issued by partnerships or trusts through which a Fund receives principal and interest payments that are passed through to the holder of the participation interest from the payments made on the underlying debt obligations. The purchaser of a participation interest receives an undivided interest in the underlying debt obligations. The issuers of the underlying debt obligations make interest and principal payments to the intermediary, as an initial purchaser, which are passed through to purchasers in the secondary market, such as a Fund. Mortgage-backed securities are a common type of participation interest. Participation interests may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating-rate obligations or as zero-coupon, pay-in-kind or step-coupon securities and may be privately placed or publicly offered. See Permissible Fund Investments — Zero-Coupon, Pay-in-Kind and Step-Coupon Securities and Permissible Fund Investments — Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities for more information.

Loan participations also are a type of participation interest. Loan participations are interests in loans that are administered by a lending bank or agent for a syndicate of lending banks and sold by the bank or syndicate members.

Investing in participation interests is subject to certain risks. Participation interests generally are subject to the credit risk associated with the underlying borrowers. If the underlying borrower defaults, a Fund may be subject to delays, expenses and risks that are greater than those that would have been involved if a Fund had purchased a direct obligation of the borrower. A Fund also may be deemed a creditor of the lending bank or syndicate members and be subject to the risk that the lending bank or syndicate members may become insolvent.

Preferred Stock

Preferred stock represents units of ownership of a corporation that frequently have dividends that are set at a specified rate. Preferred stock has preference over common stock in the payment of dividends and the liquidation of assets. Preferred stock shares some of the characteristics of both debt and equity. Preferred stock ordinarily does not carry voting rights. Most preferred stock is cumulative; if dividends are passed (i.e., not paid for any reason), they accumulate and must be paid before common stock dividends. Participating preferred stock entitles its holders to share in profits above and beyond the declared dividend, along with common shareholders, as distinguished from nonparticipating preferred stock, which is limited to the stipulated dividend. Convertible preferred stock is exchangeable for a given number of shares of common stock and thus tends to be more volatile than nonconvertible preferred stock, which generally behaves more like a fixed income bond. Preferred stock may be privately placed or publicly offered. See Permissible Fund Investments — Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities for more information.

Auction preferred stock (APS) is a type of adjustable-rate preferred stock with a dividend determined periodically in a Dutch auction process by corporate bidders. Shares typically are bought and sold at face values generally ranging from $100,000 to $500,000 per share.

In addition to reinvestment risk if interest rates fall, some specific risks with regard to APS include:

•

Failed auction: A breakdown in the auction process can occur; in the event that the process fails, the rate is reset at the maximum applicable rate, which is usually described in the prospectuses and typically is influenced by the issuer’s credit rating. In a failed auction, current shareholders generally are unable to sell some, or all, of the shares when the auction is completed. Typically, the liquidity for APS that have experienced a failed auction becomes very limited. If a failed auction were to occur, the shareholder generally would hold his or her shares until the next auction. Should there not be subsequent auctions that “cure” the failed process, the shareholder may: (1) hold the APS in anticipation of a refinancing by the issuer that would cause the APS to be called, or (2) hold securities either indefinitely or in anticipation of the development of a secondary market.

•

Early call risk: APS generally is redeemable at any time, usually upon notice, at the issuer’s option, at par plus accrued dividends.

Investing in preferred stock is subject to certain risks. For example, stock market risk is the risk that the value of such stocks, like the broader stock markets, may decline over short or even extended periods. Domestic and foreign stock markets tend to be cyclical, with periods when prices generally rise and periods when prices generally decline. The value of individual stocks will rise and decline based on factors specific to each corporation, such as changes in earnings or management.

Investing in preferred stock also may involve the risks applicable to investing in a particular company. For example, stocks of smaller companies tend to have greater price fluctuations than stocks of larger companies because, among other things, they trade less frequently and in lower volumes, are more susceptible to changes in economic conditions, are more reliant on singular products or services and are more vulnerable to larger competitors. Stocks of these companies may have a higher potential for gains but also are subject to greater risk of loss.

Investing in preferred stock also may involve the risks applicable to investing in a particular industry, such as technology, financial services, consumer goods or natural resources (e.g., oil and gas). To some extent, the prices of stocks tend to move by industry sector. When market conditions favorably affect, or are expected to favorably affect, an industry, the prices of the stocks of companies in that industry tend to rise. Conversely, negative news or a poor outlook for a particular industry can cause the value of those companies’ stock to decline.

Private Placement and Other Restricted Securities

Private placement securities are securities that have been privately placed and the offer and sale of which are not registered under the 1933 Act. They are eligible for sale only to certain eligible investors. Private placements often may offer attractive opportunities for investment not otherwise available on the open market. Private placement and other “restricted” securities often cannot be sold to the public without registration under the 1933 Act or the availability of an exemption from registration (such as Rules 144 or 144A), or they are “not readily marketable” because they are subject to other legal or contractual delays in or restrictions on resale. Asset-backed securities, common stock, convertible securities, corporate debt securities, foreign securities, low and below investment grade securities, money market instruments, mortgage-backed securities, municipal securities, participation interests, preferred stock and other types of equity and debt instruments may be privately placed or restricted securities.

Private placements typically may be sold only to qualified institutional buyers (or, in the case of the initial sale of certain securities, such as those issued in collateralized debt obligations or collateralized loan obligations, to accredited investors (as defined in Rule 501(a) under the 1933 Act)), or in a privately negotiated transaction or to a limited number of purchasers, or in limited quantities after they have been held for a specified period of time and other conditions are met pursuant to an exemption from registration.

Investing in private placement and other restricted securities is subject to certain risks. Private placements may be considered illiquid securities. Private placements typically are subject to restrictions on resale as a matter of contract or under federal securities laws. Because there may be relatively few potential purchasers for such securities, especially under adverse market or economic conditions or in the event of adverse changes in the financial condition of the issuer, a Fund could find it more difficult to sell such securities when it may be advisable to do so or it may be able to sell such securities only at prices lower than if such securities were more widely held. At times, it also may be more difficult to determine the fair value of such securities for purposes of computing a Fund’s net asset value (NAV) due to the absence of a trading market.

Real Estate Investment Trusts and Master Limited Partnerships

REITs are entities that either own properties or make construction or mortgage loans and also may include operating or finance companies. An equity REIT generally holds equity positions in real estate and seeks to provide its shareholders with income from the leasing of its properties and with capital gains from any sales of properties. A mortgage REIT generally specializes in lending money to owners of properties and passes through any interest income it may earn to its shareholders.

Partnership units of real estate and other types of companies sometimes are organized as master limited partnerships in which ownership interests are publicly traded. Master limited partnerships often own several properties or businesses (or directly own interests) that are related to real estate development and the oil and gas industries, but they also may finance motion pictures, research and development and other projects.

REITs are subject to certain risks associated with direct ownership of real estate, including, for example, declines in the value of real estate, risks related to general and local economic conditions, overbuilding and increased competition, increases in property taxes and operating expenses, and variations in rental income. REITs also may be subject to interest rate risk. In general, increases in interest rates will decrease the value of high-yield securities and increase the costs of obtaining financing, which could decrease the value of a REIT’s investments. In addition, equity REITs may be affected by changes in the value of the underlying property owned by the REITs, while mortgage REITs may be affected by the quality of credit extended. Both equity and mortgage REITs are dependent upon management skills. REITs also may be subject to heavy cash flow dependency, defaults by borrowers, and the possibility of failing to qualify for preferential tax treatment under the Code, which could adversely affect dividend payments. REITs also may not be diversified.

Investing in master limited partnerships generally is subject to the risks applicable to investing in a partnership as opposed to a corporation, which may include fewer protections afforded to investors. Additional risks include those associated with the specific industries in which a master limited partnership invests, such as the risks associated with investing in the real estate or oil and gas industries.

Repurchase Agreements

Repurchase agreements are agreements under which a Fund acquires a security for a relatively short period of time subject to the obligation of a seller to repurchase and a Fund to resell such security at a fixed time and price (representing a Fund’s cost plus interest). Repurchase agreements also may be viewed as loans made by a Fund that are collateralized by the securities subject to repurchase. A Fund typically will enter into repurchase agreements only with commercial banks, registered broker/dealers and the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (FICC). Such transactions are monitored to ensure that the value of the underlying securities will be at least equal at all times to the total amount of the repurchase obligation, including any accrued interest.

Repurchase agreements generally are subject to counterparty risk. If a counterparty defaults, a Fund could realize a loss on the sale of the underlying security to the extent that the proceeds of the sale are less than the resale price provided in the repurchase agreement including interest. In the event that a counterparty fails to perform

because it is insolvent or otherwise subject to insolvency proceedings against it, a Fund’s right to take possession of the underlying securities would be subject to applicable insolvency law and procedure, including an automatic stay (which would preclude immediate enforcement of a Fund’s rights) and exemptions thereto (which would permit a Fund to take possession of the underlying securities or to void a repurchase agreement altogether). Since it is possible that an exemption from the automatic stay would not be available, a Fund might be prevented from immediately enforcing its rights against the counterparty. Accordingly, if a counterparty becomes insolvent or otherwise subject to insolvency proceedings against it, a Fund may incur delays in or be prevented from liquidating the underlying securities and could experience losses, including the possible decline in value of the underlying securities during the period in which a Fund seeks to enforce its rights thereto, possible subnormal levels of income or lack of access to income during such time, as well as the costs incurred in enforcing a Fund’s rights. For example, if a Fund enters into a repurchase agreement with a broker that becomes insolvent, it is possible for the Securities Investor Protection Corporation (SIPC) to institute a liquidation proceeding in federal court against the broker counterparty which could lead to a foreclosure by SIPC of the underlying securities or SIPC may stay, or preclude, a Fund’s ability under contract to terminate the repurchase agreement.

Reverse Repurchase Agreements

Reverse repurchase agreements are agreements under which a Fund sells a security subject to the obligation of a buyer to resell and a Fund to repurchase such security at a fixed time and price. Reverse repurchase agreements also may be viewed as borrowings made by a Fund.

Reverse repurchase agreements involve the risk that the market value of the securities a Fund is obligated to repurchase under the agreement may decline below the repurchase price. In the event the buyer of securities under a reverse repurchase agreement files for bankruptcy or becomes insolvent, a Fund’s use of proceeds of the agreement may be restricted pending a determination by the other party, or its trustee or receiver, whether to enforce a Fund’s obligation to repurchase the securities. In addition, reverse repurchase agreements are techniques involving leverage, and are subject to asset coverage requirements. Under the requirements of the 1940 Act, a Fund is required to maintain an asset coverage (including the proceeds of the borrowings) of at least 300% of all borrowings.

Stripped Securities

Stripped securities are securities that evidence ownership in either the future interest or principal payments on an instrument. There are many different types and variations of stripped securities. For example, Separately Traded Interest and Principal Securities, or STRIPS, can be component parts of a U.S. Treasury security where the principal and interest components are traded independently through DTC, a clearing agency registered pursuant to Section 17A of the 1934 Act, and created to hold securities for its participants, and to facilitate the clearance and settlement of securities transactions between participants through electronic computerized book-entries, thereby eliminating the need for physical movement of certificates. Treasury Investor Growth Receipts, or TIGERS, are U.S. Treasury securities stripped by brokers. Stripped mortgage-backed securities, or SMBS, also can be issued by the U.S. Government or its agencies. Stripped securities may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating-rate obligations.

SMBS usually are structured with two or more classes that receive different proportions of the interest and principal distributions from a pool of mortgage-backed assets. Common types of SMBS will be structured so that one class receives some of the interest and most of the principal from the mortgage-backed assets, while another class receives most of the interest and the remainder of the principal.

Investing in stripped securities is subject to certain risks. If the underlying obligations experience greater than anticipated prepayments of principal, a Fund may fail fully to recoup its initial investment in such securities. The market value of the class consisting primarily or entirely of principal payments can be especially volatile in response to changes in interest rates. The rates of return on a class of SMBS that receives all or most of the

interest are generally higher than prevailing market rates of return on other mortgage-backed obligations because their cash flow patterns also are volatile and there is a greater risk that the initial investment will not be recouped fully.

U.S. Government and Related Obligations

U.S. Government obligations include U.S. Treasury obligations and securities issued or guaranteed by various agencies of the U.S. Government or by various instrumentalities which have been established or sponsored by the U.S. Government. U.S. Treasury obligations and securities issued or guaranteed by various agencies of the U.S. Government differ in their interest rates, maturities and time of issuance, as well as with respect to whether they are guaranteed by the U.S. Government. U.S. Government and related obligations may be structured as fixed-, variable- or floating-rate obligations.

U.S. Government obligations also include senior unsecured debt securities issued between October 14, 2008 and October 31, 2009 by eligible issuers (including U.S. depository institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) (and certain affiliates), U.S. bank holding companies and certain U.S. savings and loan holding companies) that are guaranteed by the FDIC under its Temporary Liquidity Guarantee Program (the TLGP). The FDIC’s guarantee under the TLGP will expire upon the earlier of (i) maturity of such security or (ii) December 31, 2012. It is the view of the FDIC and the staff of the SEC that any debt security that is guaranteed by the FDIC under the TLGP and that has a maturity that ends on or before December 31, 2012 would be a security exempt from registration under the Section 3(a)(2) of the 1933 Act because such security would be fully and unconditionally guaranteed by the FDIC.

Investing in securities guaranteed under the TLGP is subject to certain risks. Given that there is a limited track record for securities guaranteed under the TLGP, it is uncertain whether such securities will continue to trade in line with recent experience in relation to U.S. Treasury and government agency securities in terms of yield spread and the volatility of such spread, and it is uncertain how such securities will trade in the secondary market and whether that market will be liquid or illiquid. The TLGP is a new program that is subject to change. In order to collect from the FDIC under the TLGP, a claims process must be followed. Failure to follow the claims process could result in a loss of the right to payment under the guarantee. In addition, guarantee payments by the FDIC under the TLGP may be delayed.

Investing in U.S. Government and related obligations is subject to certain risks. While U.S. Treasury obligations are backed by the “full faith and credit” of the U.S. Government, securities issued or guaranteed by federal agencies and U.S. Government-sponsored instrumentalities may or may not be backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government. These securities may be supported by the ability to borrow from the U.S. Treasury or only by the credit of the issuing agency or instrumentality and, as a result, may be subject to greater credit risk than securities issued or guaranteed by the U.S. Treasury. Obligations of U.S. Government agencies, authorities, and instrumentalities and sponsored entities historically have involved limited risk of loss of principal if held to maturity. However, no assurance can be given that the U.S. Government would provide financial support to any of these entities if it is not obligated to do so by law.

Warrants and Rights

Warrants and rights are types of securities that give a holder a right to purchase shares of common stock. Warrants usually are issued together with a bond or preferred stock and entitle a holder to purchase a specified amount of common stock at a specified price typically for a period of years. Rights usually have a specified purchase price that is lower than the current market price and entitle a holder to purchase a specified amount of common stock typically for a period of only weeks. Warrants may be used to enhance the marketability of a bond or preferred stock.

Warrants and rights may be subject to the risk that the securities could lose value. There also is the risk that the potential exercise price may exceed the market price of the warrants or rights, such as when there is no movement in the market price or the market price of such securities declines.

When-Issued, Delayed Delivery and Forward Commitment Transactions

When-issued, delayed delivery and forward commitment transactions involve the purchase or sale of securities by a Fund, with payment and delivery taking place in the future. When engaging in when-issued, delayed delivery and forward commitment transactions, a Fund typically will hold cash or liquid securities in a segregated account in an amount equal to or greater than the purchase price. The payment obligation and, if applicable, the interest rate that will be received on the securities, are fixed at the time that a Fund agrees to purchase the securities. A Fund generally will enter into when-issued, delayed delivery and forward commitment transactions only with the intention of completing such transactions. However, the Adviser may determine not to complete a transaction if it deems it appropriate. In such cases, a Fund may realize short-term gains or losses.

When-issued, delayed delivery and forward commitment transactions involve the risks that the securities purchased may fall in value by the time they actually are issued or that the other party may fail to honor the contract terms. A Fund that invests in delayed delivery securities may rely on a third party to complete the transaction. Failure by a third party to deliver a security purchased on a delayed delivery basis may result in a financial loss to a Fund or the loss of an opportunity to make an alternative investment.

Zero-Coupon, Pay-in-Kind and Step-Coupon Securities

Zero-coupon, pay-in-kind and step-coupon securities are types of debt instruments that do not necessarily make payments of interest in fixed amounts or at fixed intervals. Asset-backed securities, convertible securities, corporate debt securities, foreign securities, low and below investment grade securities, mortgage-backed securities, participation interests, stripped securities, U.S. Government and related obligations and other types of debt instruments may be structured as zero-coupon, pay-in-kind and step-coupon securities.

Zero-coupon securities do not pay interest on a current basis but instead accrue interest over the life of the security. These securities include, among others, zero-coupon bonds, which either may be issued at a discount by a corporation or government entity or may be created by a brokerage firm when it strips the coupons from a bond or note and then sells the bond or note and the coupon separately. This technique is used frequently with U.S. Treasury bonds, and zero-coupon securities are marketed under such names as CATS (Certificate of Accrual on Treasury Securities), TIGERs (Treasury Investor Growth Receipts) or STRIPS (Separate Trading of Registered Interest and Principal of Securities). Zero-coupon bonds also are issued by municipalities. Buying a municipal zero-coupon bond frees its purchaser of the obligation to pay regular federal income tax on imputed interest, since the interest is exempt for regular federal income tax purposes. Zero-coupon certificates of deposit and zero-coupon mortgages are generally structured in the same fashion as zero-coupon bonds; the certificate of deposit holder or mortgage holder receives face value at maturity and no payments until then.

Pay-in-kind securities normally give the issuer an option to pay cash at a coupon payment date or to give the holder of the security a similar security with the same coupon rate and a face value equal to the amount of the coupon payment that would have been made.

Step-coupon securities trade at a discount from their face value and pay coupon interest. The coupon rate is paid according to a schedule for a series of periods, typically lower for an initial period and then increasing to a higher coupon rate thereafter. The discount from the face amount or par value depends on the time remaining until cash payments begin, prevailing interest rates, liquidity of the security and the perceived credit quality of the issue.

Zero-coupon, step-coupon and pay-in-kind securities holders generally have substantially all the rights and privileges of holders of the underlying coupon obligations or principal obligations. Holders of these securities have the right upon default on the underlying coupon obligations or principal obligations to proceed directly and individually against the issuer and are not required to act in concert with other holders of such securities.

Investing in zero-coupon, pay-in-kind and step-coupon securities is subject to certain risks, including that market prices of zero-coupon, pay-in-kind and step-coupon securities generally are more volatile than the prices of securities that pay interest periodically and in cash, and are likely to respond to changes in interest rates to a greater degree than other types of debt securities.

Because zero-coupon securities bear no interest, they are volatile. Since zero-coupon bondholders do not receive interest payments, zero-coupon securities fall more dramatically than bonds paying interest on a current basis when interest rates rise. However, when interest rates fall, zero-coupon securities rise more rapidly in value than interest paying bonds.

Borrowings

Each Fund has a fundamental policy with respect to borrowing that can be found under the heading About the Funds’ Investments — Fundamental and Non-Fundamental Investment Policies. Specifically, each Fund may not borrow money or issue senior securities except to the extent permitted by the 1940 Act, the rules and regulations thereunder and any exemptive relief obtained by the Funds. In general, pursuant to the 1940 Act, a Fund may borrow money only from banks in an amount not exceeding 33¹/3% of its total assets (including the amount borrowed) less liabilities (other than borrowings). Any borrowings that come to exceed this amount must be reduced within three days (not including Sundays and holidays) to the extent necessary to comply with the 33¹/3% limitation.

The Trust maintains a line of credit in order to permit borrowing on a temporary basis to meet share redemption requests in circumstances in which temporary borrowing may be preferable to liquidation of portfolio securities. Any borrowings under that line of credit by the Funds would be subject to each Fund’s restrictions on borrowing. See About the Funds’ Investments — Fundamental and Non-Fundamental Investment Policies.

Short Sales

A Fund will sometimes sell securities short when it owns an equal amount of such securities as those securities sold short. This is a technique known as selling short “against the box.” If a Fund makes a short sale “against the box,” it would not immediately deliver the securities sold and would not receive the proceeds from the sale. The seller is said to have a short position in the securities sold until it delivers the securities sold, at which time it receives the proceeds of the sale. To secure its obligation to deliver securities sold short, a Fund will deposit in escrow in a separate account with the custodian an equal amount of the securities sold short or securities convertible into or exchangeable for such securities. A Fund can close out its short position by purchasing and delivering an equal amount of the securities sold short, rather than by delivering securities already held by a Fund, because a Fund might want to continue to receive interest and dividend payments on securities in its portfolio that are convertible into the securities sold short.

Columbia European Fund and Columbia Emerging Markets Fund may not sell securities short or maintain a short position, except short sales “against the box” where the Fund owns at least an equal amount of such securities, or owns securities that are convertible or exchangeable into, without payment or further consideration, at least an equal amount of such securities.

Short sales by a Fund that are not made “against the box” create opportunities to increase a Fund’s return but, at the same time, involve specific risk considerations and may be considered a speculative technique. Because a Fund in effect profits from a decline in the price of the securities sold short without the need to invest

the full purchase price of the securities on the date of the short sale, a Fund’s net asset value (NAV) per share tends to increase more when the securities it has sold short decrease in value, and to decrease more when the securities it has sold short increase in value, than if it had not engaged in such short sales. The amount of any gain will be decreased, and the amount of any loss increased, by the amount of any premium, dividends or interest a Fund may be required to pay in connection with the short sale. Short sales could potentially involve unlimited loss, as the market price of securities sold short may continually increase, although a Fund can mitigate any such losses by replacing the securities sold short. Under adverse market conditions, a Fund might have difficulty purchasing securities to meet its short sale delivery obligations, and might have to sell portfolio securities to raise the capital necessary to meet its short sale obligations at a time when fundamental investment considerations would not favor such sales. There is also the risk that the third party to the short sale may fail to honor its contract terms, causing a loss to a Fund.

Short sales “against the box” entail many of the same risks and considerations described above regarding short sales not “against the box.” However, when a Fund sells short “against the box” it typically limits the amount of securities that it has leveraged. A Fund’s decision to make a short sale “against the box” may be a technique to hedge against market risks when the Adviser believes that the price of a security may decline, causing a decline in the value of a security owned by a Fund or a security convertible into or exchangeable for such security. In such case, any future losses in a Fund’s long position would be reduced by a gain in the short position. The extent to which such gains or losses in the long position are reduced will depend upon the amount of securities sold short relative to the amount of the securities a Fund owns, either directly or indirectly, and, in the case where a Fund owns convertible securities, changes in the investment values or conversion premiums of such securities. Short sales may have adverse tax consequences to a Fund and its shareholders.

A Fund’s successful use of short sales also will be subject to the ability of the Adviser to predict movements in the directions of the relevant market. A Fund therefore bears the risk that the Adviser will incorrectly predict future price directions. In addition, if a Fund sells a security short, and that security’s price goes up, a Fund will have to make up the margin on its open position (i.e., purchase more securities on the market to cover the position). It may be unable to do so and thus its position may not be closed out. There can be no assurance that a Fund will not incur significant losses in such a case.

In the view of the SEC, a short sale involves the creation of a “senior security” as such term is defined in the 1940 Act, unless the sale is “against the box” and the securities sold short are placed in a segregated account (not with the broker), or unless a Fund’s obligation to deliver the securities sold short is “covered” by placing in a segregated account (not with the broker) cash, U.S. Government securities or other liquid debt or equity securities in an amount equal to the difference between the market value of the securities sold short at the time of the short sale and any such collateral required to be deposited with a broker in connection with the sale (not including the proceeds from the short sale), which difference is adjusted daily for changes in the value of the securities sold short. The total value of the cash, U.S. Government securities or other liquid debt or equity securities deposited with the broker and otherwise segregated may not at any time be less than the market value of the securities sold short at the time of the short sale.

Lending Securities

Securities lending refers to the lending of a Fund’s portfolio securities. Each Fund may lend portfolio securities representing up to one-third of the value of its total assets to broker/dealers, banks or other institutional borrowers of securities that the Funds’ securities lending agent (GSAL) has determined are creditworthy under guidelines established by the Trustees. The Funds will pay a portion of income earned on lending transactions to its securities lending agent, and also may pay administrative and custodial fees in connection with loans of securities. The cost of administering the program is included in fees paid by the Funds to the Administrator.

The Funds receive collateral, in the form of cash, equal to at least 102% under normal circumstances, of the value of the securities loaned. Loans are subject to termination at any time by the Funds or a borrower. In the

event of bankruptcy or other default of a borrower, a Fund could experience delays both in liquidating the loan collateral and in recovering the loaned securities and could sustain losses, arising from, among others matters: (i) a decline in the value of the collateral or in the value of the securities loaned during the period the Fund seeks to enforce its rights thereto; (ii) lower than expected levels of income and lack of access to income during that period; (iii) expenses of enforcing the Fund’s rights; and (iv) losses on the investment or reinvestment of cash collateral.

When a Fund lends portfolio securities, payments in lieu of dividends made by the borrower to the Fund do not constitute “qualified dividends” taxable at the same rate as long-term capital gains, even if the actual dividends would have constituted qualified dividends had the Fund held the securities. A lending Fund does not have the right to vote loaned securities. In accordance with the procedures adopted by the Board, a lending Fund will attempt to call all loaned securities back to permit the exercise of voting rights, if time and jurisdictional restrictions permit. There is no guarantee that all loans can be recalled.

Portfolio Turnover

A change in the securities held by a Fund is known as “portfolio turnover.” High portfolio turnover (e.g., over 100% annually) involves correspondingly greater expenses to the Fund, including brokerage commissions or dealer mark-ups and other transaction costs on the sale of securities and reinvestments in other securities. Such sales may also result in adverse tax consequences to a Fund’s shareholders. The trading costs and tax effects associated with portfolio turnover may adversely affect a Fund’s performance.

The Funds have not completed a full year of operations and thus have no portfolio turnover to report.

Disclosure of Portfolio Information

The Board has adopted policies and procedures with respect to the disclosure of the Funds’ portfolio holdings and trading strategies by the Funds, the Adviser, Columbia Management and their affiliates (the Policies). The Policies are designed to prevent any disclosure of confidential Fund portfolio holdings information that could harm the Funds and their shareholders. The Policies provide that Fund portfolio holdings information generally may not be disclosed to any party prior to public disclosure which is: (1) the business day next following the posting of such information on the Columbia Funds website at www.columbiamanagement.com; or (2) the time a Fund discloses the information in a publicly available SEC filing required to include such information. As described below, the Policies provide for certain limited exceptions that allow for disclosure of Fund portfolio holdings information in advance of public dissemination only when a Fund has legitimate business purposes for doing so and the recipients are subject to a duty of confidentiality, including a duty not to trade on the nonpublic information. The Policies prohibit Ameriprise Financial, the Adviser and the Funds’ other service providers from entering into any agreement to disclose Fund portfolio holdings information or trading strategies in violation of the Policies or from entering into any agreement to disclose portfolio information in exchange for any form of consideration. The Policies incorporate and adopt the supervisory controls and recordkeeping requirements established in the Adviser’s Policies. The Adviser has also adopted policies and procedures to monitor for compliance with the Policies.

Public Disclosures

The Funds’ portfolio holdings are currently disclosed to the public through required filings with the SEC and on the Columbia Funds website at www.columbiafunds.com. Once posted, the portfolio holdings information will remain available on the website until at least the date on which a Fund files a Form N-CSR or Form N-Q for the period that includes the date as of which the information is current. The Funds’ complete holdings are disclosed at www.columbiamanagement.com as of a month-end approximately 30 calendar days after such month-end. In addition, the largest 10 to 15 holdings of each Fund are usually available sooner, approximately 15 calendar days after each month-end. Purchases and sales of the Funds’ portfolio securities can take place at any

time, so the portfolio holdings information available to the website may not always be current. The scope of the information disclosed at www.columbiafunds.com pursuant to the Policies relating to each Fund’s portfolio securities also may change from time to time, without prior notice.

The Funds file their portfolio holdings with the SEC for each fiscal quarter on either Form N-CSR (with respect to each annual period and semiannual period) or Form N-Q (with respect to the first and third quarters of the Funds’ fiscal year). Shareholders may obtain the Funds’ Forms N-CSR and N-Q filings on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, a link to which is provided at the Columbia Funds website at www.columbiamanagement.com. In addition, the Funds’ Forms N-CSR and N-Q filings may be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s public reference room in Washington, D.C. You may call the SEC at (202) 551.8090 for information about the SEC’s website or the operation of the public reference room.

The Funds, the Adviser, Ameriprise Financial or their affiliates may include portfolio holdings information that has already been made public through a web posting or SEC filing in marketing literature and other communications to shareholders, financial advisors or other parties. In addition, certain advisory clients of the Adviser that follow a strategy similar to that of a Fund have access to their own custodial account’s portfolio holdings information before such Fund posts its holdings on the Columbia Funds website at www.columbiamanagement.com. It is possible that when clients observe transactions in their own accounts, they may infer transactions of the Funds prior to public disclosure of Fund transactions.

Other Disclosures

Pursuant to the Policies, the Funds may selectively disclose their portfolio holdings information in advance of public disclosure on a confidential basis to various Fund service providers that require such information for the legitimate business purpose of assisting the Funds with day-to-day business affairs. Neither the Funds nor Ameriprise Financial, the Adviser or their affiliates receive compensation or consideration from the service providers for the portfolio holdings information. In addition to Ameriprise Financial, the Adviser and their affiliates, including Threadneedle International Limited, these service providers are listed below:


IDENTITY OF RECIPIENT	PURPOSE OF DISCLOSURE	FREQUENCY OF DISCLOSURE
Wilshire Associates	Supports performance analysis software.	Daily

JPMorgan	Funds’ Custodian; receives trade files containing information for the Funds.	Daily

Sikich ICS	Host of the Funds’ Trustee website.	Monthly

GIS Ltd. (MFACT)	Provides support for the Adviser’s accounting systems.	As needed, generally less than twice per year

ITG (formerly known as Macgregor)	Provides support for the Adviser’s trading system.	As needed, generally less than twice per year

Factset Research Data Systems, Inc.	Provides quantitative analysis, charting and fundamental data to investment, marketing, performance and distribution personnel.	Daily


IDENTITY OF RECIPIENT	PURPOSE OF DISCLOSURE	FREQUENCY OF DISCLOSURE
Interactive Data Corporation (IDC)	Provides statistical fair valuation services to support the Adviser.	As needed

Merrill Corporation	Printer for the Funds’ prospectuses, SAIs, supplements and sales materials.	Quarterly

RR Donnelley Financial	Printer for the Funds’ prospectuses, SAIs, supplements and sales materials.	Quarterly

Abel Noser	Evaluation and assessment of trading activity, execution and practices by the Adviser.	As needed, generally no less than quarterly

GSAL	Funds’ securities lending agent.	As needed in connection with the Funds’ securities lending program

Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (ISS)	Proxy service provider to the Funds. Holdings are only redistributed by ISS through voting the shares held and within the Funds’ N-PX filings.	Daily

Perkins Coie LLP	Legal counsel to the Funds.	As needed

Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP	Legal counsel to the Independent Trustees.	As needed

ING Insurance Company	Provides quarterly fact sheets.	Quarterly

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP	Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm, providing audit services, tax return review services, and assistance in connection with the review of various SEC filings.	As needed

Pursuant to agreements in such form as the Chief Compliance Officer (CCO) of the Funds may require, these service providers are required to keep such information confidential, and are prohibited from trading based on the information or otherwise using the information except as necessary in providing services to the Funds.

The Funds have authorized the Adviser’s President (and his designated subordinates) to make appropriate disclosures of the Funds’ holdings to certain Ameriprise Financial affiliates (to provide monitoring of compliance with codes of ethics and to monitor various holdings limitations that must be aggregated with affiliated funds, among other purposes), to provide the Custodian, sub-custodians and pricing service with daily trade information, to disclose necessary portfolio information to the Funds’ proxy service. The Funds have also authorized the Adviser’s President and Chief Operating Officer (and their designated subordinates) to disclose portfolio information to independent auditors in connection with audit procedures. In addition, the Funds have

authorized Ameriprise Financial and the Adviser’s President (and his designated subordinates) to disclose necessary information to printing firms engaged by Ameriprise Financial to prepare periodic reports to Fund shareholders.

The Adviser uses a variety of broker/dealers and other agents to effect securities transactions on behalf of the Funds. These broker/dealers become aware of the Funds’ intentions, transactions and positions, in performing their functions. Further, the Funds’ ability to identify and execute transactions in securities is dependent, in part, on information provided to the Adviser by broker/dealers who are market makers in certain securities or otherwise have the ability to assist the Funds in executing their orders. To facilitate that process, the Board has authorized the Adviser’s President and Director of Global Trading (and their designated subordinates) to disclose portfolio information or anticipated transactions to broker/dealers who may execute Fund transactions. This disclosure is limited to that information necessary to effect the Funds’ securities transactions and assist the Adviser in seeking to obtain best execution.

The CCO is responsible for implementation of the Policies. The CCO is required to report to the Board any violations of the Policies that come to his attention and may approve non-public disclosures of a Fund’s portfolio holdings. Such disclosure must be consistent with the Policies in that it furthers a legitimate business purpose of a Fund, is therefore in the best interests of that Fund’s shareholders and is appropriately reported to the Board.

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AND OTHER SERVICES

The Adviser and Investment Advisory Services

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (the Adviser) (operating as a limited partnership prior to May 1, 2010 and named Wanger Asset Management, L.P. prior to September 29, 2000), serves as the investment adviser for the Funds, the other series of the Trust, the series of Wanger Advisors Trust and other institutional accounts. The Adviser and its predecessors have managed mutual funds, including Columbia Acorn Fund, since 1992.

As of June 30, 2011, the Adviser had assets under management of approximately $35.8 billion.

The Adviser is located at 227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, Illinois 60606, and is a registered investment adviser and wholly owned subsidiary of Columbia Management, which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Ameriprise Financial. Prior to May 1, 2010, when the long-term asset management business of Columbia Management Group, LLC, including 100% of the Adviser, was acquired by Ameriprise Financial, the Adviser was a wholly owned subsidiary of Bank of America. Prior to April 1, 2004, when FleetBoston Financial Corporation (Fleet) was acquired by Bank of America, Columbia Management Group, LLC was a wholly owned subsidiary of Fleet.

At a special meeting held on May 27, 2010, as recommended by the Board, shareholders of the Trust approved the Trust’s Advisory Agreement, which took effect immediately and initially continued in effect through July 31, 2011. Thereafter, the Advisory Agreement continues from year to year until terminated by either party, as long as it is specifically approved at least annually by either the Board or by a vote of the majority of the outstanding shares of the Funds and by the vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees, cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on such approval. At a meeting held on March 2, 2011, the Board approved the Advisory Agreement with respect to Columbia Acorn European Fund and Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund, to be effective upon effectiveness of registration with the SEC, and determined that the compensation to be paid by the Funds to the Adviser under the Advisory Agreement was fair and reasonable.

The Advisory Agreement generally provides that, subject to the overall supervision and control of the Board, the Adviser shall have supervisory responsibility for the general management and investment of the Funds’ assets and will endeavor to preserve the autonomy of the Trust. Under the Advisory Agreement, the Adviser is authorized to make decisions to buy and sell securities and other assets for the Funds, to place the Funds’ portfolio transactions with broker-dealers and to negotiate the terms of such transactions including brokerage commissions on brokerage transactions on behalf of the Funds. The Adviser is authorized to exercise discretion within the Trust’s policy concerning allocation of its portfolio brokerage, as permitted by law, and in so doing shall not be required to make any reduction in its investment advisory fees. The Adviser is required to use its best efforts to seek to obtain the best overall terms available for portfolio transactions for each Fund. See Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices—General Brokerage Policy, Brokerage Transactions and Broker Selection.

The Adviser, at its own expense, provides office space, facilities and supplies, equipment and personnel for the performance of its functions under the Advisory Agreement. The Trust pays all compensation of the Independent Trustees (although certain fees were reimbursed by the Adviser and its affiliated persons in connection with the Acquisition).

Under the Advisory Agreement, the Adviser is not liable for any loss suffered by a Fund or its shareholders as a result of any error of judgment, or any loss arising out of any investment, or as a consequence of any other act or omission of the Adviser or any of its affiliates in the performance of the Adviser’s duties under the agreement, except for (i) with respect to acts or omissions in respect of investment activities, liability resulting from willful misfeasance, bad faith, reckless disregard or gross negligence, and (ii) with respect to all other matters, liability resulting from bad faith, intentional misconduct or negligence, on the part of the Adviser or its affiliates.

A discussion regarding the basis of the Board’s approval of the Advisory Agreement with respect to Columbia Acorn European Fund and Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund will be in the Funds’ first annual report to shareholders.

Advisory Fee Rates and Fees Paid

The Funds pay the Adviser an annual fee for its investment advisory services as shown in the section entitled Fees and Expenses — Annual Fund Operating Expenses in each Fund’s prospectuses. The advisory fee is calculated as a percentage of the average daily net assets of each Fund and is paid monthly. The advisory fee rates payable to the Adviser under the Advisory Agreement are identical to those payable under the Prior Advisory Agreement. The Adviser may pay amounts from its own assets to the Distributor and/or to selling and/or servicing agents for services they provide.

The Funds had not commenced operations as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and accordingly have no advisory fee payments to report.

Portfolio Managers

The following provides additional information about the portfolio managers of the Adviser who are responsible for making the day-to-day investment decisions for the Funds. As described in the Management of the Fund — Primary Service Providers section of each Fund’s prospectuses, the portfolio managers of the Adviser who are responsible for the Funds are:

Portfolio Managers of the Adviser


Portfolio Manager		Fund
Andreas Waldburg-Wolfegg		Columbia Acorn European Fund

Stephen Kusmierczak		Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund

Fritz Kaegi		Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund

P. Zachary Egan		Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund

Louis J. Mendes		Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund

Compensation

For services performed in 2011, the Funds’ portfolio managers, analysts and other key employees of the Adviser will receive all of their compensation in the form of salary and incentive compensation provided in whole by Ameriprise Financial. Typically, a high proportion of an analyst’s or portfolio manager’s incentive compensation is paid in cash with a smaller proportion going into two separate incentive plans. The first plan is a notional investment based on the performance of certain Columbia Funds, including the Columbia Acorn Funds. The second plan consists of Ameriprise Financial restricted stock and/or options. Both plans vest over three years from the date of issuance.

Portfolio managers and key analysts are positioned in compensation tiers based on cumulative performance of the portfolios/stocks that they manage. Portfolio manager performance is measured versus primary portfolio benchmarks. Analyst performance is measured versus a custom benchmark for each analyst. One- and three-year performance periods primarily drive incentive levels. Incentive compensation varies by tier and can range from between a fraction of base pay to a multiple of base pay, the objective being to provide very competitive total compensation for high performing analysts and portfolio managers. Incentives are adjusted up or down up to 15% based on qualitative performance factors, which include investment performance impacts not included in benchmarks such as industry (or country) weighting recommendations, plus adherence to compliance standards, business building, and citizenship. Less seasoned analysts’ incentives are also based on performance versus benchmarks, though they are less formulaic in order to emphasize investment process instead of initial investment results. The qualitative factors discussed above are also considered. These analysts participate in an incentive pool which is based on a formula primarily driven by firm-wide investment performance.

In addition, the incentive amounts available for the entire pool for 2011 and 2012 will be adjusted up or down based upon the increase/decrease in the Adviser’s revenues versus an agreed upon base revenue amount. Investment performance, however, impacts incentives far more than revenues. The Adviser determines incentive compensation, subject to review by Ameriprise Financial.

Performance Benchmarks


Portfolio Manager		Benchmark(s)
Andreas Waldburg-Wolfegg		S&P $500 Million to $5 Billion Europe^® Index HSBC Smaller European Companies Index MSCI Europe Small Cap Index

Stephen Kusmierczak (Columbia Acorn European Fund)		S&P $500 Million to $5 Billion Europe^® Index HSBC European Companies Index MSCI Europe Small Cap Index

Stephen Kusmierczak (Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund)		S&P $500 Million to $5 Billion Emerging Markets^® Index MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index Russell Emerging Markets Small Cap Index

Fritz Kaegi		S&P $500 Million to $5 Billion Emerging Markets^® Index MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index Russell Emerging Markets Small Cap Index

P. Zachary Egan		S&P $500 Million to $5 Billion Emerging Markets^® Index MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index Russell Emerging Markets Small Cap Index

Louis J. Mendes		S&P $500 Million to $5 Billion Emerging Markets^® Index MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index Russell Emerging Markets Small Cap Index

Other Accounts

The following table shows the number and assets of other investment accounts (or portions of investment accounts) that the Funds’ portfolio managers managed, as of July 31, 2011, in addition to Columbia Acorn European Fund and Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund, and, with respect to Messrs. Egan and Mendes, also in addition to the other series of Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust.

Other Accounts Managed by the Portfolio Managers


Portfolio Manager	Other SEC-registered open- end and closed-end funds				Other pooled investment vehicles				Other accounts
	Number of accounts		Assets		Number of accounts		Assets		Number of accounts		Assets
Andreas Waldburg-Wolfegg		0	$	0		1	$	53,060,379		6	$	2,402,707
Stephen Kusmierczak		0	$	0		1	$	53,060,379		5	$	3,260,717
Fritz Kaegi		0	$	0		0	$	0		6	$	1,793,222
P. Zachary Egan		4	$	1,370,611,247		0	$	0		8	$	3,206,786
Louis J. Mendes		4	$	1,370,611,247		0	$	0		7	$	4,562,600

Other Accounts Managed by the Portfolio Managers for which the Advisory Fee is Based on Performance

As of July 31, 2011, none of the Fund’s portfolio managers managed an account for which the advisory fee was based on performance.

Portfolio Manager Ownership of Securities

As of August 19, 2011, the portfolio managers of Columbia Acorn European Fund and Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund beneficially owned Class Z shares of each Fund (as determined pursuant to Rule 16a-1(a)(2) under the 1934 Act) as follows:


Portfolio Manager	Fund	Dollar Range of Equity Securities in the Fund Beneficially Owned

Andreas Waldburg-Wolfegg	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		$1-$10,000 $10,001-$50,000

Stephen Kusmierczak	Columbia Acorn European Fund		$100,001-$500,000
	Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		$100,001-$500,000

Fritz Kaegi	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		$50,001-$100,000 $100,001-$500,000

P. Zachary Egan	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		$100,001-$500,000 $100,001-$500,000

Louis J. Mendes	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		$50,001-$100,000 $100,001-$500,000

The Adviser’s Portfolio Managers and Potential Conflicts of Interests

Like other investment professionals with multiple clients, a Fund’s portfolio manager(s) may face certain potential conflicts of interest in connection with managing both the Fund and other accounts at the same time. The Adviser and the Funds have adopted compliance policies and procedures that attempt to address certain of the potential conflicts that portfolio managers face in this regard. Certain of these conflicts of interest are summarized below.

The management of accounts with different advisory fee rates and/or fee structures, including accounts that pay advisory fees based on account performance (performance fee accounts), if any, may raise potential conflicts of interest for a portfolio manager by creating an incentive to favor higher fee accounts.

Potential conflicts of interest also may arise when a portfolio manager has personal investments in other accounts that may create an incentive to favor those accounts. As a general matter and subject to the Adviser’s Code of Ethics and certain limited exceptions, the Adviser’s investment professionals do not have the opportunity to invest in client accounts, other than the Funds.

A portfolio manager who is responsible for managing multiple funds and/or accounts may devote unequal time and attention to the management of those funds and/or accounts. The effects of this potential conflict may be more pronounced where funds and/or accounts managed by a particular portfolio manager have different investment strategies.

A portfolio manager may be able to select or influence the selection of the broker/dealers that are used to execute securities transactions for the Funds. A portfolio manager’s decision as to the selection of broker/dealers could produce disproportionate costs and benefits among the Funds and the other accounts the portfolio manager manages.

A potential conflict of interest may arise when a portfolio manager buys or sells the same securities for a Fund and other accounts. On occasions when a portfolio manager considers the purchase or sale of a security to be in the best interests of a Fund as well as other accounts, the Adviser’s trading desk may, to the extent consistent with applicable laws and regulations, aggregate the securities to be sold or bought in order to obtain the best execution and lower brokerage commissions, if any. Aggregation of trades may create the potential for unfairness to a Fund or another account if a portfolio manager favors one account over another in allocating the securities bought or sold.

“Cross trades,” in which a portfolio manager sells a particular security held by a Fund to another account (potentially saving transaction costs for both accounts), could involve a potential conflict of interest if, for example, a portfolio manager is permitted to sell a security from one account to another account at a higher price than an independent third party would pay. The Adviser and the Funds have adopted compliance procedures that provide that any transactions between a Fund and another account managed by the Adviser are to be made at an independent current market price, consistent with applicable laws and regulation.

Another potential conflict of interest may arise based on the different investment objectives and strategies of a Fund and other accounts managed by its portfolio manager(s). Depending on another account’s objectives and other factors, a portfolio manager may give advice to and make decisions for a Fund that may differ from advice given, or the timing or nature of decisions made, with respect to another account. A portfolio manager’s investment decisions are the product of many factors in addition to basic suitability for the particular account involved. Thus, a portfolio manager may buy or sell a particular security for certain accounts, and not for a Fund, even though it could have been bought or sold for the Fund at the same time. A portfolio manager also may buy a particular security for one or more accounts when one or more other accounts are selling the security (including short sales). There may be circumstances when a portfolio manager’s purchases or sales of portfolio securities for one or more accounts may have an adverse effect on other accounts, including the Funds.

A Fund’s portfolio manager(s) also may have other potential conflicts of interest in managing the Fund, and the description above is not a complete description of every conflict that could exist in managing the Fund and other accounts. Many of the potential conflicts of interest to which the Adviser’s portfolio managers are subject are essentially the same as or similar to the potential conflicts of interest related to the investment management activities of the Adviser and its affiliates. See Investment Advisory and Other Services — Other Roles and Relationships of Ameriprise Financial and its Affiliates — Certain Conflicts of Interest for more information about conflicts of interest, including those that relate to the Adviser and its affiliates.

The Administrator

Columbia WAM (which is also the Adviser) serves as Administrator of the Funds.

Services Provided

Pursuant to the terms of the Administration Agreement, the Administrator provides certain administrative services to each Fund, including: (i) maintaining the books and records, including financial and corporate records, of the Trust, and providing pricing and bookkeeping services to the Funds; (ii) supervising the preparation and filing of registration statements, notices, reports, proxy statements, tax returns and other documents, as deemed necessary or desirable by the Trust; (iii) overseeing and assisting in the coordination of the performance of administrative and third party professional services rendered to the Funds, including the Funds’ securities lending agent; (iv) providing corporate secretarial services and data processing facilities and calculating and arranging for notice and payment of distribution to shareholders; (v) developing and implementing procedures to monitor each Fund’s compliance with regulatory requirements and with each Fund’s investment policies and restrictions; (vi) providing for the services of employees of the Administrator who may be appointed as officers of the Trust; and (vii) providing services to shareholders of the Funds. The Administration Agreement may be terminated by the Board or Columbia WAM upon 60 days written notice. The Administrator has the power under the Administration Agreement to delegate some or all of its responsibilities to others, at the Administrator’s expense. The Administrator retains responsibility for any services it delegates.

The Administrator has delegated a majority of its responsibilities under the Administration Agreement to Columbia Management as the Funds’ Sub-Administrator. The Sub-Administrator provides certain of the above enumerated services to the Funds, including fund accounting services, and receives a fee from the Administrator for such services.

Administration Fee Rates and Fees Paid

Columbia WAM receives compensation for its administration services, which is computed daily and paid monthly as a percentage of the average daily net assets of each Fund at the annual rates shown in each Fund’s prospectuses.

The Funds had not commenced operations as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and accordingly have no administration fee payments to report.

The Principal Underwriter/Distributor

Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc. (the Distributor) serves as the principal underwriter and distributor of the shares of the Funds. Its address is: 225 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110.

Distribution Obligations

Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, the Distributor, as agent, sells shares of the Funds on a continuous basis and transmits purchase and redemption orders that it receives to the Trust or the Transfer Agent. Additionally, the Distributor has agreed to use appropriate efforts to solicit orders for the sale of shares and to undertake advertising and promotion as it believes appropriate in connection with such solicitation. Pursuant to the Distribution Agreement, the Distributor, at its own expense, finances those activities which are primarily intended to result in the sale of shares of the Funds, including, but not limited to, advertising, compensation of underwriters, dealers and sales personnel, the printing of prospectuses to other than existing shareholders, and the printing and mailing of sales literature. The Distributor, however, may be compensated or reimbursed for all or a portion of such expenses to the extent permitted by a Distribution Plan adopted by the Trust pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act.

The Distribution Agreement became effective with respect to each Fund after approval by the Board, and continues from year to year, provided that such continuation of the Distribution Agreement is specifically approved at least annually by (i) the Board, or (ii) a majority vote of the Funds’ outstanding securities, provided that in either instance, the continuance is also approved by the majority of the Independent Trustees who are not parties to the agreement, by vote cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting such approval. The Distribution Agreement terminates automatically in the event of its assignment, and is terminable with respect to each Fund at any time without penalty by the Trust (by vote of the Board or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the Fund) or by the Distributor on 60 days written notice.

Underwriting Commissions

The Funds had not commenced operations as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and accordingly have no receipts/retentions of commissions or other compensation by the Distributor to report.


		Other Roles and Relationships of Ameriprise Financial and its Affiliates — Certain Conflicts of Interest

As described above in the Investment Advisory and Other Services section of this SAI, and in the Management of the Fund — Primary Service Providers section of each Fund’s prospectus, the Adviser, Administrator, Distributor and Transfer Agent, all affiliates of Ameriprise Financial, receive compensation from the Funds for the various services they provide to the Funds. Additional information as to the specific terms regarding such compensation is set forth in these affiliated service providers’ contracts with the Funds, each of which typically is included as an exhibit to Part C of each Fund’s registration statement.

In many instances, the compensation paid to the Advisor and other Ameriprise Financial affiliates for the services they provide to the Funds is based, in some manner, on the size of the Funds’ assets under management.

As the size of the Funds’ assets under management grows, so does the amount of compensation paid to the Adviser and other Ameriprise Financial affiliates for providing services to the Funds. This relationship between Fund assets and affiliated service provider compensation may create economic and other conflicts of interests of which Fund investors should be aware. These potential conflicts of interest, as well as additional ones, are discussed in detail below and also are addressed in other disclosure materials, including the Funds’ prospectuses. These conflicts of interest also are highlighted in account documentation and other disclosure materials of Ameriprise Financial affiliates that make available or offer the Columbia Funds as investments in connection with their respective products and services. In addition, the Adviser’s Form ADV, which it must file with the SEC as an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, provides information about the Adviser’s business, assets under management, affiliates and potential conflicts of interest. Parts 1 and 2 of the Adviser’s Form ADV are available online through the SEC’s website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.

Additional actual or potential conflicts of interest and certain investment activity limitations that could affect the Funds may arise from the financial services activities of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates, including, for example, the investment advisory/management services provided for clients and customers other than the Funds. In this regard, Ameriprise Financial is a major financial services company. Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates, are engaged in a wide range of financial activities beyond the mutual fund-related activities of the Adviser, including, among others, broker/dealer (sales and trading), asset management, insurance and other financial activities. The broad range of financial services activities of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates may involve multiple advisory, transactional, lending, financial and other interests in securities and other instruments, and in companies, that may be bought, sold or held by the Funds. The following describes certain actual and potential conflicts of interest that may be presented.

Actual and Potential Conflicts of Interest Related to the Investment Advisory/Management Activities of Ameriprise Financial and its Affiliates in Connection With Other Advised/Managed Funds and Accounts

The Adviser and other affiliates of Ameriprise Financial may advise or manage funds and accounts other than the Funds. In this regard, Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates may provide investment advisory/management and other services to other advised/managed funds and accounts that are similar to those provided to the Funds. The Adviser and Ameriprise Financial’s other investment adviser affiliates (including, for example, Columbia Management) will give advice to and make decisions for all advised/managed funds and accounts, including the Funds, as they believe to be in that fund’s and/or account’s best interests, consistent with their fiduciary duties. The Funds and the other advised/managed funds and accounts of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates are separately and potentially divergently managed, and there is no assurance that any investment advice Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates give to other advised/managed funds and accounts will also be given simultaneously or otherwise to the Funds.

A variety of other actual and potential conflicts of interest may arise from the advisory relationships of the Adviser and other Ameriprise Financial affiliates with other clients and customers. Advice given to the Funds and/or investment decisions made for the Funds by the Adviser or other Ameriprise Financial affiliates may differ from, or may conflict with, advice given to and/or investment decisions made for other advised/managed funds and accounts. As a result, the performance of the Funds may differ from the performance of other funds or accounts advised/managed by the Adviser or other Ameriprise Financial affiliates. Similarly, a position taken by Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates, including the Adviser, on behalf of other funds or accounts may be contrary to a position taken on behalf of the Funds. Moreover, Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates, including the Adviser, may take a position on behalf of other advised/managed funds and accounts, or for their own proprietary accounts, that is adverse to companies or other issuers in which the Funds are invested. For example, the Funds may hold equity securities of a company while another advised/managed fund or account may hold debt securities of the same company. If the portfolio company were to experience financial difficulties, it might be in the best interest of the Funds for the company to reorganize while the interests of the other advised/managed fund or account might be better served by the liquidation of the company. This type of conflict of interest could arise as the result of circumstances that cannot be generally foreseen within the broad range of investment advisory/management activities in which Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates engage.

Investment transactions made on behalf of other funds or accounts advised/managed by the Adviser or other Ameriprise Financial affiliates also may have a negative effect on the value, price or investment strategies of the Funds. For example, this could occur if another advised/managed fund or account implements an investment decision ahead of, or at the same time as, the Funds and causes the Funds to experience less favorable trading results than they otherwise would have experienced based on market liquidity factors. In addition, the other funds and accounts advised/managed by the Adviser and other Ameriprise Financial affiliates, including the other Columbia Funds, may have the same or very similar investment objective and strategies as the Funds. In this situation, the allocation of, and competition for, investment opportunities among the Funds and other funds and/or accounts advised/managed by the Adviser or other Ameriprise Financial affiliates may create conflicts of interest especially where, for example, limited investment availability is involved. The Adviser has adopted policies and procedures addressing the allocation of investment opportunities among the Funds and other funds and accounts advised by the Adviser and other affiliates of Ameriprise Financial. For more information, see Investment Advisory and Other Services — The Adviser and Investment Advisory Services — Portfolio Managers — The Adviser’s Portfolio Managers and Potential Conflicts of Interests.

Sharing of Information among Advised/Managed Accounts

Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates also may possess information that could be material to the management of a Fund and may not be able to, or may determine not to, share that information with the Fund, even though the information might be beneficial to the Fund. This information may include actual knowledge regarding the particular investments and transactions of other advised/managed funds and accounts, as well as proprietary investment, trading and other market research, analytical and technical models, and new investment techniques, strategies and opportunities. Depending on the context, Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates generally will have no obligation to share any such information with the Funds. In general, employees of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates, including the portfolio managers of the Adviser, will make investment decisions without regard to information otherwise known by other employees of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates, and generally will have no obligation to access any such information and may, in some instances, not be able to access such information because of legal and regulatory constraints or the internal policies and procedures of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates. For example, if the Adviser or another Ameriprise Financial affiliate, or their respective employees, come into possession of non-public information regarding another advised/managed fund or account, they may be prohibited by legal and regulatory constraints, or internal policies and procedures, from using that information in connection with transactions made on behalf of the Funds. For more information, see Investment Advisory and Other Services — The Adviser and Investment Advisory Services — Portfolio Managers — The Adviser’s Portfolio Managers and Potential Conflicts of Interests.

Soft Dollar Benefits

Certain products and services, commonly referred to as “soft dollar services” (including, to the extent permitted by law, research reports, economic and financial data, financial publications, proxy analysis, computer databases and other research-oriented materials), that the Adviser may receive in connection with brokerage services provided to a Fund may have the inadvertent effect of disproportionately benefiting other advised/managed funds or accounts. This could happen because of the relative amount of brokerage services provided to a Fund as compared to other advised/managed funds or accounts, as well as the relative compensation paid by a Fund.

Services Provided to Other Advised/Managed Accounts

Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates also may act as an investment adviser, investment manager, administrator, transfer agent, custodian, trustee, broker/dealer, agent, or in another capacity, for advised/managed funds and accounts other than the Funds, and may receive compensation for acting in such capacity. This compensation that the Adviser, Distributor and Transfer Agent and other Ameriprise Financial affiliates receive could be greater than the compensation Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates receive for acting in the same or similar capacity for the Funds. In addition, the Adviser, Distributor and Transfer Agent and other Ameriprise

Financial affiliates may receive other benefits, including enhancement of new or existing business relationships. This compensation and/or the benefits that Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates may receive from other advised/ managed funds and accounts and other relationships could potentially create incentives to favor other advised/managed funds and accounts over the Funds. Trades made by Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates for the Funds may be, but are not required to be, aggregated with trades made for other funds and accounts advised/managed by the Adviser and other Ameriprise Financial affiliates. If trades are aggregated among the Funds and those other funds and accounts, the various prices of the securities being traded may be averaged, which could have the potential effect of disadvantaging the Funds as compared to the other funds and accounts with which trades were aggregated.

Proxy Voting

Although the Adviser endeavors to make all proxy voting decisions with respect to the interests of the Funds for which it is responsible in accordance with its proxy voting policies and procedures, the Adviser’s proxy voting decisions with respect to a Fund’s portfolio securities may nonetheless benefit other advised/managed funds and accounts, and/or clients, of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates. The Adviser has adopted proxy voting policies and procedures that are designed to provide that all proxy voting is done in the best interests of its clients, including the Funds, without any resulting benefit or detriment to the Adviser and/or its affiliates, including Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates. For more information about the Adviser’s proxy voting policies and procedures, see Investment Advisory and Other Services — Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures.

Certain Trading Activities

The directors/trustees, officers and employees of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates may buy and sell securities or other investments for their own accounts, and in doing so may take a position that is adverse to the Funds. In order to reduce the possibility that such personal investment activities of the directors/trustees, officers and employees of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates will materially adversely affect the Funds, Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates have adopted policies and procedures, and the Funds, the Board, the Adviser and the Distributor have each adopted a Code of Ethics that addresses such personal investment activities. For more information, see Investment Advisory and Other Services — Codes of Ethics.

Affiliate Transactions

Subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements, the Funds may enter into transactions in which Ameriprise Financial and/or its affiliates may have an interest that potentially conflicts with the interests of the Funds. For example, an affiliate of Ameriprise Financial may sell securities to the Funds from an offering in which it is an underwriter or from securities that it owns as a dealer, subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements.

Investment Limitations Arising from Ameriprise Financial Activities

Regulatory restrictions applicable to Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates may limit the Funds’ investment activities in various ways. For example, regulations regarding certain industries and markets, such as those in emerging or international markets, and certain transactions, such as those involving certain futures and derivatives, may impose a cap on the aggregate amount of investments that may be made by affiliated investors, including accounts managed by the same affiliated manager, in the aggregate or in individual issuers. At certain times, Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates also may be restricted in the securities that can be bought or sold for the Funds and other advised/managed funds and accounts because of the investment banking, lending or other relationships Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates have with the issuers of securities. This could happen, for example, if the Funds and/or other advised/managed funds and accounts desired to buy a security issued by a company for which Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates served as underwriter. The internal policies and procedures of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates covering these types of regulatory restrictions and

addressing similar issues also may at times restrict the Funds’ investment activities. A client not advised by Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates would not be subject to many of these restrictions. See also About the Funds’ Investments — Certain Investment Activity Limits.

Actual and Potential Conflicts of Interest Related to Ameriprise Financial and its Affiliates’ Non-Advisory Relationships with Clients and Customers other than the Funds

The financial relationships that Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates may have with companies and other entities in which a Fund may invest can give rise to actual and potential conflicts of interest. Subject to applicable legal and regulatory requirements, a Fund may invest (a) in the securities of Ameriprise Financial and/or its affiliates and/or in companies in which Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates have an equity, debt or other interest, and/or (b) in the securities of companies held by other Columbia Funds. The purchase, holding and sale of such securities by a Fund may enhance the profitability and the business interests of Ameriprise Financial and/or its affiliates and/or other Columbia Funds. There also may be limitations as to the sharing with the Adviser of information derived from the non-investment advisory/management activities of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates because of legal and regulatory constraints and internal policies and procedures (such as information barriers and ethical walls). Because of these limitations, Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates generally will not share information derived from its non-investment advisory/management activities with the Adviser.

Actual and Potential Conflicts of Interest Related to Ameriprise Financial Affiliates’ Marketing and Use of the Columbia Funds as Investment Options

Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates also provide a variety of products and services that, in some manner, may utilize the Columbia Funds as investment options. For example, the Columbia Funds may be offered as investments in connection with brokerage and other securities products offered by Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates, and may be utilized as investments in connection with fiduciary, investment management and other accounts offered by affiliates of Ameriprise Financial, as well as for other Columbia Funds structured as “funds of funds.” The use of the Columbia Funds in connection with other products and services offered by Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates may introduce economic and other conflicts of interest. These conflicts of interest are highlighted in account documentation and other disclosure materials for the other products and services offered by Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates.

Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates, including the Adviser, may make payments to their affiliates in connection with the promotion and sale of the Funds’ shares, in addition to the sales-related and other compensation that these parties may receive from the Funds. As a general matter, personnel of Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates do not receive compensation in connection with their sales or use of the Funds that is greater than that paid in connection with their sales of other comparable products and services. Nonetheless, because the compensation that the Adviser and other affiliates of Ameriprise Financial may receive for providing services to the Funds is generally based on the Funds’ assets under management and those assets will grow as shares of the Funds are sold, potential conflicts of interest may exist. See Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices — Additional Selling and/or Servicing Agent Payments for more information.

Other Service Providers

The Transfer Agent

Columbia Management Investment Services Corp. acts as Transfer Agent for each Fund’s shares and can be contracted at P.O. Box 8081, Boston, MA 02266-8081. Under the Transfer Agency Agreement, the Transfer Agent provides transfer agency, dividend disbursing agency and shareholder servicing agency services to the Funds. Each Fund pays the Transfer Agent an annual fee of $17.00 per open account, payable monthly for transfer agency services. In addition, each Fund reimburses the Transfer Agent for the sub-transfer agency fees and expenses it pays to third party dealer firms and transfer agents that maintain omnibus accounts with the Fund (sub-transfer agency fees), subject to a cap equal to 0.05% of the Fund’s net assets represented by the account.

Each Fund also reimburses the Transfer Agent for the Fund’s allocable portion of certain reimbursable out-of-pocket expenses, which fees are approved by the Trustees from time to time, including networking account fees paid to dealer firms by the Transfer Agent on shareholder accounts established or maintained pursuant to the National Securities Clearing Corporation’s (NSCC) networking system. In addition, the Transfer Agent also may retain as additional compensation for its services all the Transfer Agent revenues for fees for wire, telephone and redemption orders, IRA trustee agent fees and account transcripts due the Transfer Agent from shareholders of the Fund and interest (net of bank charges) earned with respect to the balances in accounts the Transfer Agent maintains in connection with its services to the Funds.

The Transfer Agent retains BFDS/DST, 2 Heritage Drive, North Quincy, MA 02171 as the Funds’ sub-transfer agent. BFDS/DST assists the Transfer Agent in carrying out its duties.

The Custodian

JPMorgan, One Chase Manhattan Plaza, New York, New York 10005, is the Custodian of the Funds’ assets. It is responsible for holding all securities and cash of the Funds, receiving and paying for securities purchased, delivering against payment securities sold, receiving and collecting income from investments and performing other administrative duties, all as directed by authorized persons of the Funds. The Adviser and Columbia Management supervise JPMorgan in such matters as the purchase and sale of portfolio securities. Portfolio securities purchased in the United States are maintained in the custody of JPMorgan or other domestic banks or depositories. Portfolio securities purchased outside of the United States are maintained in the custody of foreign banks and trust companies who are members of JPMorgan’s foreign depository and foreign sub-custodian network.

With respect to foreign depositories and foreign sub-custodians, there can be no assurance that a Fund, and the value of its shares, will not be adversely affected by acts of foreign governments, financial or operational difficulties of the foreign sub-custodians, difficulties and costs of obtaining jurisdiction over, or enforcing judgments against, the foreign sub-custodians or application of foreign law to a Fund’s foreign sub-custodial arrangements. Accordingly, investors should recognize that the noninvestment risks involved in holding assets abroad are greater than those associated with holding assets in the U.S.

The Funds may invest in obligations of JPMorgan and may purchase securities from or sell securities to JPMorgan.

Prior to July 22, 2011, State Street served as the custodian for the assets of the Columbia Acorn Funds.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, located at One North Wacker, Chicago, Illinois 60606, serves as the Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm, providing audit services, tax return review services and assistance and consultation in connection with the review of various SEC filings. The report of the Funds’ independent registered public accounting firm and the audited financial statements will be included in the Funds’ reports to shareholders for the period ended December 31, 2011.

Counsel

Perkins Coie LLP serves as counsel to the Funds. Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP serves as counsel to the Independent Trustees. Perkins Coie LLP is located at 700 13^th Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20005. Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP is located at One Logan Square, Suite 200, Philadelphia, PA 19103.

Securities Lending Agent

GSAL, 125 High Street, Oliver Street Tower, Suite 1700, Boston, MA 02110, is the Funds’ securities lending agent. As such, GSAL is responsible, among other things for: entering into and maintaining securities loan agreements with borrowers; negotiating fees with borrowers; delivering securities to borrowers; receiving

collateral from borrowers in connection with loans; and investing cash collateral in accordance with instructions received from the Adviser.

Distribution Plan

The Trustees have approved a Distribution Plan pursuant to Rule 12b-1 under the 1940 Act for each of the Funds’ Class A and Class C shares. Class I and Class Z shares of the Funds do not pay service and distribution fees. Under the Distribution Plan, each Fund pays the Distributor monthly service and distribution fees at the annual rates described in the prospectuses for that Funds’ Class A and Class C shares. The Distributor may use the entire amount of such fees to defray the costs of commissions and service fees paid to selling and/or servicing agents and for certain other purposes. Since the distribution and service fees are payable regardless of the Distributor’s expenses, the Distributor may realize a profit from the fees.

The Distribution Plan authorizes payments by the Funds to the Distributor and its affiliates (including the Adviser) with respect to the Funds’ Class A and Class C shares to the extent that such payments might be construed to be indirect financing of the distribution of those shares.

The Board believes the Distribution Plan could be a significant factor in the growth and retention of Fund assets resulting in a more advantageous expense ratio and increased investment flexibility which could benefit each class of Fund shareholders. The Distribution Plan will continue in effect from year to year so long as its continuance is specifically approved at least annually by a vote of the Trustees, including the Independent Trustees that have no direct or indirect financial interest in the operation of the Distribution Plan or in any agreements related to the Plan, by vote cast in person at a meeting called for the purpose of voting on the Distribution Plan. The Distribution Plan may not be amended to increase the fee materially without approval by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the relevant class of shares and all material amendments of the Plan must be approved by the Trustees in the manner described above. The Distribution Plan may be terminated at any time by vote of a majority of the Independent Trustees or by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities of the relevant class of shares.

The Funds had not commenced operations as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and accordingly have no distribution and/or service fee payments to report.

Codes of Ethics

The Funds, the Adviser and the Distributor have adopted Codes of Ethics pursuant to the requirements of the 1940 Act, including Rule 17j-1 under the 1940 Act. These Codes of Ethics permit personnel subject to the Codes of Ethics to invest in securities, including securities that may be bought or held by the Funds. These Codes of Ethics are included as exhibits to Part C of the Funds’ registration statement. These Codes of Ethics can be reviewed and copied at the SEC’s Public Reference Room and may be obtained by calling the SEC at 202.551.8090; they also are available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov, and may be obtained, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request to publicinfo@sec.gov or by writing to the SEC’s Public Reference Section, Washington, D.C. 20549-1520.

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

The Funds have delegated to the Adviser the responsibility to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities held by the Funds. In deciding to delegate this responsibility to the Adviser, the Board reviewed and approved the policies and procedures adopted by the Adviser. These included the procedures that the Adviser follows when a vote presents a conflict between the interests of the Funds and their shareholders and the Adviser, its affiliates, its other clients or other persons.

The Adviser’s policy is that all proxies for Fund securities must be voted in a manner considered by the Adviser to be in the best interest of the Funds and their shareholders without regard to any benefit to the Adviser,

its affiliates, its other clients or other persons. The Adviser examines each proposal and votes against the proposal, if, in its judgment, approval or adoption of the proposal would be expected to have an adverse impact on the current or potential market value of the issuer’s securities. The Adviser also examines each proposal and votes the proxies against the proposal, if, in its judgment, the proposal would be expected to affect adversely the best interest of the Funds. The Adviser determines the best interest of the Funds in light of the potential economic return on the Funds’ investment. The Adviser submits an annual report to the Board addressing various proxy voting matters, including, among other matters, votes cast contrary to the Adviser’s general voting guidelines, votes involving potential conflicts of interest and significant issues considered by the Adviser’s Proxy Voting Committee (Proxy Committee). In certain circumstances, the Adviser’s policies permit the Adviser to abstain on votes or refrain from voting with respect to shares of foreign stocks.

The Adviser seeks to address potential material conflicts of interest by having predetermined voting guidelines and by having each individual stock analyst review and vote each proxy for the stocks that he or she follows. For those proposals that require special consideration or in instances where special circumstances may require varying from the predetermined guideline, the Proxy Committee determines the vote in the best interest of the Funds, without consideration of any benefit to the Adviser, its affiliates, its other clients or other persons. The Proxy Committee is composed of representatives of the Adviser’s equity investments, equity research, compliance and administration functions. In addition to the responsibilities described above, the Proxy Committee has the responsibility to review, on an annual basis, the Adviser’s proxy voting policies to ensure consistency with internal and regulatory agency policies, and to develop additional predetermined voting guidelines to assist in the review of proxy proposals.

The Proxy Committee may vary from a predetermined guideline if it determines that voting on the proposal according to the predetermined guideline would be expected to have an adverse impact on the current or potential market value of the issuer’s securities or to affect adversely the best interest of the client. References to the best interest of a client refer to the interest of the client in terms of the potential economic return on the client’s investment. In determining the vote on any proposal, the Proxy Committee does not consider any benefit other than benefits to the owner of the securities to be voted. A member of the Proxy Committee is prohibited from voting on any proposal for which he or she has a conflict of interest by reason of a direct relationship with the issuer or other party affected by a given proposal. Persons making recommendations to the Proxy Committee or its members are required to disclose to the Committee any relationship with a party making a proposal or other matter known to the person that would create a potential conflict of interest.

The Adviser has retained Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), a third party vendor, to implement its proxy voting process. ISS provides proxy analysis, record keeping services, vote disclosure services and independent proxy voting services.

Information about how the Funds voted proxies relating to portfolio securities during the most recent twelve month period ended June 30 will be available by August 31 of each year free of charge: (i) through the Columbia Funds website, www.columbiamanagement.com, (ii) by calling Columbia Funds at 800.426.3750 or (iii) through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. For a copy of the Adviser’s policies and procedures that are used to determine how to vote proxies relating to portfolio securities held by the Fund, see Appendix B to this SAI.

FUND GOVERNANCE

The Board

The following table provides basic information about the Trustees, including their names, the date each was first elected or appointed to office, the principal business occupations of each during at least the last five years and other directorships held. Each Trustee also serves as a trustee of Wanger Advisors Trust, another open-end investment company, the series of which also are managed by the Adviser. The mailing address of each Trustee is: c/o Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC, 227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, Illinois 60606.

Independent Trustee Biographical Information


Name, Position Held with the Trust and Age at July 31, 2011	Year First Appointed or Elected to a Board in the Columbia Funds Complex*	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years	Number of Funds in the Columbia Funds Complex Overseen**	Other Directorships Held by Trustee During the Past Five Years
Laura M. Born, 46, Trustee and Chair	2007	Adjunct Assistant Professor of Finance, University of Chicago Booth School of Business; Managing Director — Investment Banking, JP Morgan Chase & Co. (broker/dealer) 2002-2007; prior thereto, associated with JP Morgan as an investment banking professional since 1991.	12	Wanger Advisors Trust

Michelle L. Collins, 51, Trustee	2008	President, Cambium LLC (financial and business advisory firm) since 2007; Advisory Board Member, Svoboda Capital Partners LLC (private equity firm) since 2007; Managing Director, Svoboda Capital Partners LLC, 1998-2006.	12	Wanger Advisors Trust; Bucyrus International Inc. (mining equipment manufacturer); Molex, Inc. (electronics components manufacturer); CDW Corporation (provider of technology products and services) until October 2007.


Name, Position Held with the Trust and Age at July 31, 2011	Year First Appointed or Elected to a Board in the Columbia Funds Complex*	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years	Number of Funds in the Columbia Funds Complex Overseen**	Other Directorships Held by Trustee During the Past Five Years
Maureen M. Culhane, 63, Trustee	2007	Retired. Formerly, Vice President, Goldman Sachs Asset Management, L.P. (investment adviser), 2005-2007, and Vice President (Consultant) — Strategic Relationship Management, Goldman, Sachs & Co., 1999-2005.	12	Wanger Advisors Trust

Margaret M. Eisen, 58, Trustee	2002	Chief Investment Officer, EAM International LLC (corporate finance and asset management) since 2003; Managing Director, CFA Institute, 2005-2008.	12	Wanger Advisors Trust; Antigenics, Inc. (biotechnology and pharmaceuticals) until June 2009.

John C. Heaton, 51, Trustee	2010	Joseph L. Gidwitz Professor of Finance, University of Chicago Booth School of Business since July 2006; James H. Lorie Professor of Finance, University of Chicago Booth School of Business July 2000-July 2006. financial consultant since 2004.	12	Wanger Advisors Trust

Steven N. Kaplan, 51, Trustee	1999	Neubauer Family Professor of Entrepreneurship and Finance, University of Chicago Booth School of Business; faculty member of the University of Chicago Booth School of Business since 1988.	12	Wanger Advisors Trust; Accretive Health, Inc. (healthcare management services provider); Morningstar, Inc. (provider of independent investment research).

Allan B. Muchin, 75, Trustee	1998	Chairman Emeritus, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP (law firm).	12	Wanger Advisors Trust

Name, Position
Held with the Trust and
Age at July 31, 2011

Year First
Appointed or
Elected to a Board
in the Columbia
Funds Complex*

Principal

Occupation(s) During

the Past Five Years

Number of
Funds in the
Columbia
Funds
Complex
Overseen**

Other Directorships
Held by Trustee
During the
Past Five Years

David B. Small, 55,

Trustee

2010

Managing Director, Grosvenor Capital Management, L.P. (investment adviser) since March 1994; Adjunct Associate Professor of Finance, University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

Wanger Advisors Trust

Interested Trustee and Trustee Emeritus Biographical Information


Name, Position Held with the Trust and Age at July 31, 2011	Year First Appointed or Elected to a Board in the Columbia Funds Complex*	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years	Number of Funds in the Columbia Funds Complex Overseen**	Other Directorships Held by Trustee During the Past Five Years
Charles P. McQuaid, 57, Trustee and President⁽¹⁾	1992	President and Chief Investment Officer, Columbia WAM or its predecessors since October 2003; associated with Columbia WAM or its predecessors as an investment professional since 1978.	12	Wanger Advisors Trust

David J. Rudis, 58, Trustee⁽²⁾	2010	National Checking and Debit Executive, and Illinois President, Bank of America, 2007-2009; President, Consumer Banking Group, LaSalle National Bank, 2004-2007.	12	Wanger Advisors Trust

Name, Position
Held with the Trust and
Age at July 31, 2011

Year First
Appointed or
Elected to a Board
in the Columbia
Funds Complex*

Principal

Occupation(s) During

the Past Five Years

Number of
Funds in the
Columbia
Funds
Complex
Overseen**

Other Directorships
Held by Trustee
During the
Past Five Years

Ralph Wanger, 77,

Trustee Emeritus⁽³⁾

1970

Founder, Columbia WAM. Formerly, President, Chief Investment Officer and portfolio manager, Columbia WAM or its predecessors, July 1992-September 2003; Director, Wanger Investment Company PLC; Consultant to Columbia WAM or its predecessors, September 2003-September 2005.

Wanger Advisors Trust

*	Dates prior to April 1992 correspond to the date first elected or appointed as a director or officer of The Acorn Fund Inc., the Trust’s predecessor.

**	Includes Columbia Acorn European Fund and Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund.

⁽¹⁾	Mr. McQuaid is an “interested person” of the Trust and of the Adviser, as defined in the 1940 Act, because he is an officer of the Trust and of the Adviser.

⁽²⁾

Mr. Rudis commenced service as a Trustee on January 1, 2011. Mr. Rudis is an “interested person” of the Trust, as defined in the New York Attorney General’s Assurance of Discontinuance (the “NYAG Order”) entered into in February 2005 by Columbia Management Advisors, LLC (an indirect subsidiary of Bank of America) and Columbia Management Distributors, Inc. (an indirect subsidiary of Bank of America), because of his former employment as a Bank of America executive.

⁽³⁾	As permitted under the Trust’s By-Laws, Mr. Wanger serves as Trustee Emeritus of the Trust.

The Board and its Committees

Responsibilities

The Board has overall management responsibility for the Funds. The Trustees are responsible for supervising and overseeing the management and operation of the Trust. Each Trustee serves a term of unlimited duration, provided that at all times a majority of Trustees has been elected by shareholders. However, it is expected that every five years the Trustees will call a meeting of shareholders to elect Trustees. The Trustees appoint their own successors, provided that at least two-thirds of the Trustees, after such appointment, have been elected by shareholders. Shareholders may remove a Trustee, with or without cause, upon the vote of two-thirds of the Trust’s outstanding shares at any meeting called for that purpose. A Trustee may be removed with or without cause upon the vote of a majority of the Trustees.

Leadership Structure

The Board is currently composed of ten Trustees, eight of whom are Independent Trustees and two of whom are Interested Trustees. In addition to the ten Trustees, Ralph Wanger serves as Trustee Emeritus of the Trust. The Chair of the Board, Laura M. Born, is an Independent Trustee.

Charles P. McQuaid is considered an Interested Trustee because he is an officer of the Funds and of the Adviser. Mr. Rudis is considered an Interested Trustee under the NYAG Order because of his former employment with Bank of America.

The Board met nine times during 2010.

Each trustee was nominated to serve on the Board because of his or her experience, skills and qualifications. See Trustee Experience below. The Board believes that its leadership structure is consistent with industry practices and is appropriate in light of the size of the Trust and the nature and complexity of its business. In particular:

•

Board Composition. The Trustees believe that maintaining a Board composed of a super-majority of at least 75% Independent Trustees is appropriate and in the best interest of Fund shareholders. The Trustees also believe that having Mr. McQuaid serve as an Interested Trustee and Mr. Wanger serve as Trustee Emeritus brings management and financial insight that is important to certain of the Board’s decisions and also in the best interest of shareholders.

•

Independent Trustee Meetings and Executive Sessions. The Trustees believe that meetings of the Independent Trustees and meetings in executive session help prevent conflicts of interest from occurring and allow the Independent Trustees to deliberate candidly and constructively separately from management in a manner that affords honest disagreement and critical questioning.

•

Executive Committee. The Trustees believe that having an Executive Committee allows for expeditious action when the delay necessary to convene a full Board meeting could cause the Funds to miss business opportunities, fail to fulfill regulatory obligations or for other reasons. Actions taken by the Executive Committee generally are ratified by the full Board at its next meeting, ensuring that the Executive Committee acts in the best interests of Fund shareholders and in the absence of conflicts of interest.

The Board has established eight standing committees: the Executive Committee; the Audit Committee; the Valuation Committee; the Contract Committee; the Governance Committee; the Investment Performance Analysis Committee; the Compliance Committee; and the Securities Lending Committee. The Trustees believe that the number of standing committees, as well as the composition and scope of activities of each committee, is appropriate. The functions, responsibilities and composition of each committee are set forth below.


Committee	Members	Function	Number of Meetings in 2010
Contract	Laura M. Born (chair) Maureen M. Culhane Margaret M. Eisen David B. Small	Makes recommendations to the Board regarding the continuation or amendment of the investment advisory agreements between the Trust and the Adviser and other agreements with third party service providers.	11

Executive	Laura M. Born Charles P. McQuaid Allan B. Muchin Steven N. Kaplan	Exercises powers of the Board during intervals between meetings of the Board, with certain exceptions.	0

Governance	Allan B. Muchin (chair) Michelle L. Collins Steven N. Kaplan Laura M. Born	Makes recommendations to the Board regarding committees of the Board and committee assignments, the composition of the Board, the compensation of the Independent Trustees and candidates for election as Independent Trustees; oversees the process for evaluating the functioning of the Board, including addressing potential conflicts of interest; and monitors the performance of counsel to the Funds and the Independent Trustees and makes recommendations to the Independent Trustees regarding the selection of their counsel.	6

Investment Performance Analysis	Steven N. Kaplan (chair) Maureen M. Culhane John C. Heaton Allan B. Muchin David B. Small Charles P. McQuaid (ex-officio*)	Monitors and reviews the investment performance of each Fund; develops an appropriate framework for measuring, comparing and assessing Fund performance; provides interpretation of performance information in connection with Fund advisory contracts; makes proposals to the Adviser regarding Fund investment objectives, policies and limitations; and acts as a liaison between the Adviser and the Board in overseeing and discussing investment-related issues.	5

*	Non-voting member.

During 2010, the Board’s Ad Hoc Committee on the Sale of Columbia Management Group, LLC met five times to review issues associated with the acquisition of the Adviser by Ameriprise Financial, including negotiation of the Advisory Agreement, and made recommendations to the Board. Ms. Born, Ms. Eisen, Jack A. Wing (who served as an Independent Trustee through February 2010) and James A. Star (who served as an Independent Trustee through March 2011) served on the Committee, which was dissolved upon the May 1, 2010 closing of the acquisition.

The Governance Committee’s policy with respect to considering Trustee candidates recommended by shareholders and the procedures to be followed by shareholders in submitting such recommendations are set forth in the charter. The Governance Committee has stated that the principal criterion for the selection of candidates is their ability to contribute to the overall functioning of the Board and to carry out the responsibilities of the Trustees.

The Governance Committee believes that the Board should be comprised of Trustees who represent a broad cross section of backgrounds, skills and experience, and that each Trustee should generally exhibit stature and experience commensurate with the responsibility of representing the Funds. The Governance Committee periodically reviews the membership of the Board to determine whether it may be appropriate to add individuals with backgrounds or skill sets different from those of the current Trustees. The Governance Committee follows the process it deems appropriate under the circumstances. Generally, the Committee identifies Trustee candidates from references provided by the Independent Trustees and others, including nominees recommended by shareholders, and evaluates them through a process of questionnaires and multiple interviews. Through this process, the Governance Committee seeks to identify candidates who meet the particular needs of the Board at the time based on the existing make up of the Board. In addition, counsel to the Independent Trustees analyzes each Independent Trustee candidate to ensure that the candidate meets the independence requirements of the 1940 Act. The Trustees believe that the Board’s process for nominating Trustees effectively produces the best candidates with a diversity of qualities, experience, backgrounds and complementary skills, and that the composition of the Board allows the Board, as a body, to oversee the Funds in a manner that is consistent with the best interests of Fund shareholders.

Although the Adviser, the Trustees, or shareholders may submit suggestions for Independent Trustee candidates to the Governance Committee, neither the Governance Committee nor the Independent Trustees as a group shall consider those candidates on a preferential basis as opposed to other possible candidates. Any shareholder may submit the name of a candidate for consideration by the Governance Committee by submitting the recommendation to the Trust’s Secretary. The Secretary will forward any such recommendation to the Chairman of the Governance Committee promptly upon receipt.

Risk Oversight

In December 2008, the Board directed the Compliance Committee to develop a comprehensive approach to risk oversight. The Compliance Committee, working with the Funds’ CCO and the Adviser, developed a detailed risk reporting methodology that includes a dashboard report relating to, among other matters, investment risk, credit risk, liquidity risk, counterparty risk, compliance risk and operational risk. Currently, the Board and the Compliance Committee receive and review the risk reporting data on a quarterly basis. The Board will continue to assess the most effective means of implementing this reporting mechanism so that it provides the data that is most relevant to the Board in the exercise of its risk oversight role.

The Audit Committee also plays an important role in the Board’s risk oversight. Working with the Funds’ independent registered accountants, the Audit Committee ensures that the Funds’ annual audit scope includes risk-based considerations, such that the auditors consider the risks potentially impacting the audit findings as well as risks to the Funds’ financial position and operations. In addition, the Investment Performance Analysis Committee provides the Board with information relevant to assessing risk oversight by monitoring and reviewing the Funds’ performance metrics, including measurements of risk-adjusted returns, and by regularly conferring with the Adviser on performance-related issues. The Securities Lending Committee also receives regular reports from its third-party securities lending consultant regarding the risks associated with the Funds’ securities lending program, including counterparty risk and liquidity.

The Funds’ CCO reports to the Compliance Committee and to the Board at least quarterly regarding compliance and legal risk concerns. In addition to his quarterly reports, the CCO provides an annual report to the Board in accordance with the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures. The CCO regularly discusses relevant compliance and legal risk issues affecting the Funds during meetings with the Independent Trustees and consults with counsel. The CCO updates the Board on the application of the Fund’s compliance policies and procedures and discusses how they mitigate risk. The CCO also reports to the Board immediately regarding any problems associated with the Funds’ compliance policies and procedures that could expose (or that might have the potential to expose) the Funds to material risk.

Trustee Experience

The following is a description of the material attributes, skills and experiences that relate to the suitability of each Trustee to serve on the Board. In addition to these factors, a Trustee is required to possess certain other qualities such as integrity, intelligence, the ability to critically discuss and analyze issues presented to the Board and an understanding of a Trustee’s fiduciary obligations with respect to a registered investment company. The Board and Governance Committee believe that each of the Trustees possesses these characteristics in addition to other attributes discussed below.

Laura M. Born. Ms. Born has experience with financial, accounting, regulatory and investment matters as well as an understanding of the securities markets and industry, through her educational background, position for many years as an investment banker at a major investment banking firm and through her position with the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business where she serves as an adjunct assistant professor of finance. Ms. Born has experience analyzing and evaluating financial statements of issuers as a result of her investment banking experience, which the Board believes qualifies her to serve on the Audit Committee. Ms. Born also is familiar with the functions of the Board and its oversight responsibilities with respect to the Adviser and other Fund service providers as a result of her service as an Independent Trustee for the past four years.

Michelle L. Collins. Ms. Collins has investment, business, regulatory and finance experience, having worked as a general partner and managing director of a private equity firm and as principal in an investment banking firm, advising mid-sized growth companies on capital formation and business combinations. She has experience preparing, analyzing and evaluating financial statements, including financial statements of investment advisers and private equity funds. Ms. Collins has served as an audit committee member in many instances and as the audit committee chair of an operating company. Therefore, the Board believes that Ms. Collins is qualified to serve on the Audit Committee and as Chair of the Audit Committee. Ms. Collins has experience serving as a board member, including as a current director, of public and private operating companies and several non-profit boards. Ms. Collins also has served as an Independent Trustee for the past three years and therefore understands the functions of the Board and its oversight responsibilities with respect to the Adviser and other Fund service providers.

Maureen M. Culhane. Ms. Culhane has financial, regulatory and investment experience through her positions as an executive with a large asset management firm, as a vice president of finance and treasurer of a Fortune 100 company, and as a principal of a pension and investment management consulting firm whose clients included, among others, Fortune 100 companies and state pension plans. Ms. Culhane has experience serving as a board member of a public operating company. She also is experienced in Board operations as well as oversight of the Adviser and other Fund service providers as a result of her service as an Independent Trustee for the past four years.

Margaret M. Eisen. Ms. Eisen has experience with financial, regulatory and investment matters as a result of her position as a managing director with responsibility for multibillion dollar portfolios of equities, both public and private, at two of the largest corporate pension funds in the United States. She also acquired such experience through her position as a managing director of the CFA Institute, which sets standards for measuring competence and integrity in the fields of portfolio management and investment analysis. Ms. Eisen has experience with board functions through her position as a director of a public operating company. Ms. Eisen also is familiar with the operations of the Board and oversight of the Adviser and other Fund service providers through her service as an Independent Trustee for the past nine years.

John C. Heaton. Mr. Heaton is experienced with investment matters as a result of his educational background and academic experience as a professor of finance at the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business. Mr. Heaton has particular experience analyzing investment performance as a result of his financial consulting positions with the investment committees of certain private funds. His consulting experience has focused on matters involving trading litigation, securities pricing, pension fund allocation and fund management. Mr. Heaton also has numerous academic publications in the fields of economics and finance. Mr. Heaton also is familiar with the operations of the Board and oversight of the Adviser and other Fund service providers through his service as an Independent Trustee during the past year.

Steven N. Kaplan. Mr. Kaplan has experience with investment, accounting and finance matters through his educational background and academic position as a professor of finance at the University of Chicago, Booth School of Business where he teaches finance and business economics classes to masters and doctoral candidates. Mr. Kaplan has experience with board functions, as well as experience in the investment management industry, through his position as a director of a public operating company that provides independent investment research regarding mutual funds and investment advisers. Mr. Kaplan also is familiar with the operations of the Board and oversight of the Adviser and other Fund service providers through his service as an Independent Trustee for the past 12 years.

Allan B. Muchin. Mr. Muchin has experience with business and regulatory matters, having served as a practicing tax attorney for over 40 years and chairman of a large law firm for over 30 years. Mr. Muchin has served as an Independent Trustee for 13 years and as chair of the Governance Committee for over 11 years. Mr. Muchin also has served as a director and chairman of multiple non-profit organizations. As such, he has significant experience in Board operations, generally, as well as in oversight of the Adviser and other Fund service providers.

David J. Rudis. Mr. Rudis has financial, banking, investment, and management experience through more than 30 years of working in the financial services industry. He has held various senior executive positions at regional and national banks, most recently serving as an executive of a Fortune 100 financial institution. Mr. Rudis has familiarity with complex financial, regulatory and banking issues. He also has extensive experience with operations management and business development. Mr. Rudis commenced service as Trustee on January 1, 2011.

David B. Small. Mr. Small has experience with investments, investment performance analysis and risk management issues faced by investment advisers and mutual funds, as well as the general operations of these firms, as a result of his position as a portfolio manager and principal of a large registered investment adviser. In his position, Mr. Small has shared management responsibility for portfolio and risk management as well as for evaluation, selection, and monitoring of investment strategies and managers. Prior to his current position, Mr. Small was founder, chief executive officer and chief financial engineer of a software firm specializing in the development of portfolio risk management and trading support software. Mr. Small also is familiar with the operations of the Board and oversight of the Adviser and other Fund service providers through his service as an Independent Trustee during the past year.

Charles P. McQuaid. Mr. McQuaid has investment, business, finance and regulatory experience through his position as president, chief investment officer and director of research of the Adviser. Mr. McQuaid has served as an Interested Trustee for 18 years and therefore has significant experience with Board operations and understands the business of the Adviser.

Ralph Wanger. Mr. Wanger has investment, business, finance and regulatory experience through his position as founder of the Adviser as well as his position as former chief investment officer and portfolio manager of the firm. Mr. Wanger understands Board operations though his service on the Board for over 40 years. Mr. Wanger serves as Trustee Emeritus of the Trust.

Compensation

Trustees are compensated for their services to the Columbia Funds Family on a complex-wide basis, as shown in the table below.

Independent Trustee Compensation Year to Date as of July 31, 2011*


Name of Trustee	Columbia Acorn European Fund **		Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund**		Compensation from the Trust		Total Compensation from Columbia Funds Complex Paid to Independent Trustees
Laura M. Born⁽¹⁾		N/A		N/A	$	132,384	$	146,767
Michelle L. Collins		N/A		N/A	$	96,063	$	106,500
Maureen M. Culhane		N/A		N/A	$	135,909	$	150,675
Margaret M. Eisen		N/A		N/A	$	129,076	$	143,100
John C. Heaton⁽²⁾		N/A		N/A	$	81,962	$	90,867
Steven N. Kaplan⁽³⁾		N/A		N/A	$	104,000	$	115,300
Allan B. Muchin		N/A		N/A	$	86,322	$	95,701
David B. Small⁽⁴⁾		N/A		N/A	$	83,405	$	92,467

*	The amounts shown are estimates for the current fiscal year based upon the Trust’s existing Trustee compensation schedule and related allocation methodologies of such expenses among the Columbia Acorn Funds.

**	Expected to commence operations on or about August 19, 2011.

⁽¹⁾

Year to date as of July 31, 2011, Ms. Born had deferred $18,442 of her compensation from the Trust and $20,492 of her total compensation from the Columbia Funds Complex through the deferred compensation plan. At July 31, 2011, the value of Ms. Born’s account under the plan was approximately $80,000.

⁽²⁾

Year to date as of July 31, 2011, Mr. Heaton had deferred $24,589 of his compensation from the Trust and $27,260 of his total compensation from the Columbia Funds Complex through the deferred compensation plan. At July 31, 2011, the value of Mr. Heaton’s account under the plan was approximately $52,000.

⁽³⁾

Year to date as of July 31, 2011, Mr. Kaplan had deferred $52,000 of his compensation from the Trust and $57,650 of his total compensation from the Columbia Funds Complex through the deferred compensation plan. At July 31, 2011, the value of Mr. Kaplan’s account under the plan was approximately $900,000.

⁽⁴⁾	Year to date as of July 31, 2011, Mr. Small had deferred all of his compensation from the Trust and all of his total compensation from the Columbia Funds Complex through the deferred compensation plan. At July 31, 2011, the value of Mr. Small’s account under the plan was approximately $165,000.

Interested Trustee and Trustee Emeritus Compensation Year to Date as of July 31, 2011*


Name of Trustee	Columbia Acorn European Fund ^**		Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund^**		Aggregate Compensation from the Trust		Total Compensation from Columbia Funds Complex Paid to Trustees
Charles P. McQuaid		N/A		N/A	$	0	$	0
David J. Rudis⁽¹⁾		N/A		N/A	$	70,867	$	78,567
Ralph Wanger⁽²⁾		N/A		N/A	$	35,148	$	38,967

*	The amounts shown are estimates for the current fiscal year based upon the Trust’s existing Trustee compensation schedule and related allocation methodologies of such expenses among the Columbia Acorn Funds.

**	Expected to commence operations on or about August 19, 2011.

⁽¹⁾	Year to date as of July 31, 2011, Mr. Rudis deferred all of his compensation from the Trust and all of his total compensation from the Columbia Funds Complex through the deferred compensation plan. At July 31, 2011, the value of Mr. Rudis’s account under the plan was approximately $90,000.

⁽²⁾	Year to date as of July 31, 2011, Mr. Wanger had deferred all of his compensation from the Trust and all of his total compensation from the Columbia Funds Complex through the deferred compensation plan. At July 31, 2011, the value of Mr. Wanger’s account under the plan was approximately $590,000.

The officers and Trustees affiliated with the Adviser serve without any compensation from the Trust. The Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust have adopted a deferred compensation plan for the Independent Trustees and Mr. Rudis and Mr. Wanger. Under the plan, any Trustee who is not an “interested person” of the Trust or the Adviser (participating Trustees) and Mr. Rudis and Mr. Wanger may defer receipt of all or a portion of their compensation as Trustees in order to defer payment of income taxes or for other reasons. The deferred compensation payable to a participating Trustee is credited to a book reserve account as of the business day such compensation would have been paid to such Trustee. The value of a participant’s deferral account at any time is equal to the value that the account would have had if the contributions to the account had been invested in Class Z shares of one or more of the Funds or in shares of Columbia Money Market Fund (formerly, the RiverSource Cash Management Fund) — or, prior to May 1, 2010, certain affiliated money market funds — as designated by the participant. If a participating Trustee retires, the Trustee may elect to receive payments under the plan in a lump sum or in equal annual installments over a period of five years. If a participating Trustee dies, any amount payable under the Plan will be paid to that Trustee’s designated beneficiaries. Each Fund’s obligation to make payments under the Plan is a general obligation of that Fund. No Fund is liable for any other Fund’s obligations to make payments under the Plan.

Pursuant to the settlements discussed in the section entitled Management of the Fund — Certain Legal Matters in each Fund’s prospectuses, at least 75% of the Board must meet the independence standards set forth in the settlements (certain of those standards being more restrictive than those contained in the 1940 Act and rules thereunder and that generally prohibit affiliations with certain affiliates of the Adviser). Those independence

standards are referred to as “super-independence” standards. The chairman of the Board must meet even more stringent independence standards. Certain other conditions in the settlements generally require that:

•

No action may be taken by the Board (or any committee thereof) unless such action is approved by a majority of the members of the Board or the committee who meet the super-independence standards. If any action proposed to be approved by a majority of the Independent Trustees is not approved by the full Board, the Trust is required to disclose the proposal and the vote in its shareholder report for that period;

•

Beginning in 2005 and not less than every fifth calendar year thereafter, the Trust must hold a meeting of shareholders to elect Trustees (the Trust last held a meeting of shareholders on May 27, 2010 to elect Trustees); and

•

The Board must appoint either (a) a full-time senior officer who reports directly to the Board with respect to his or her responsibilities, including (i) monitoring compliance with federal and state securities, applicable state laws respecting potential or actual conflicts of interest and fiduciary duties, and applicable codes of ethics and compliance manuals, (ii) managing the process by which management fees to be charged to the Funds are negotiated and (iii) preparing, or directing the preparation of, a written evaluation of, among other things, management fees charged to the Funds and to institutional and other clients, profit margins of the Adviser and its affiliates from supplying services to the Funds and possible economies of scale or (b) an independent compliance consultant and an independent fee consultant with similar responsibilities. At a meeting of the Board held on February 18, 2005, a majority of the Trustees at that time, other than interested persons of the Trust or the Adviser, found Promontory Financial Group LLC not unacceptable to serve as the independent compliance consultant (ICC) to the former distributor of the Funds. At a meeting of the Board held on November 16, 2004, the Trustees at that time unanimously voted to appoint Robert P. Scales as the Senior Vice President of the Trust and to designate Mr. Scales as the individual responsible for performing the duties and responsibilities of the Senior Officer as set forth in the Assurance of Discontinuance dated February 9, 2005.

The Agreement and Declaration of Trust (the Declaration of Trust) provides that the Trust will indemnify its Trustees and officers against liabilities and expenses incurred in connection with litigation in which they may be involved because of their offices with the Trust but that such indemnification will not relieve any officer or Trustee of any liability to the Trust or its shareholders by reason of willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of his or her duties. The Trust, at its expense, provides liability insurance for the benefit of its Trustees and officers.

Beneficial Equity Ownership

As of August 19, 2011, the Trustees and the officers of the Trust, as a group, owned less than 1% of each class of the outstanding equity securities of Columbia Acorn European Fund and Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund, except as follows:


Officer	Fund	Approximate % of the Fund Beneficially Owned as of August 19, 2011
Robert A. Chalupnik	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		3.8 4.6	% %

P. Zachary Egan	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		22.9 6.9	% %

Bruce H. Lauer	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		3.8 2.3	% %

Charles P. McQuaid*	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		19.1 23.2	% %

*	Mr. McQuaid serves as an Interested Trustee and President of the Trust.


Officer	Fund	Approximate % of the Fund Beneficially Owned as of August 19, 2011
Louis J. Mendes III	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		7.6 11.6	% %

Robert A. Mohn	Columbia Acorn European Fund Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund		3.8 4.6	% %

The table below shows, for each Trustee, the amount of equity securities of each Fund beneficially owned by the Trustee and the aggregate value of all investments in equity securities of the Columbia Funds Family, including notional amounts through the deferred compensation plan, stated as one of the following ranges: A = $0; B = $1—$10,000; C = $10,001—$50,000; D = $50,001—$100,000; and E = over $100,000.

Independent Trustee Ownership for the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2010

Name of Trustee

Columbia
Acorn
European
Fund*

Columbia
Acorn
Emerging
Markets
Fund*

Aggregate Dollar Range
of Equity Securities in
all Funds in the
Columbia Funds Family

Laura M. Born

N/A

Michelle L. Collins

N/A

Maureen M. Culhane

N/A

Margaret M. Eisen

N/A

John C. Heaton

N/A

Steven N. Kaplan

N/A

Allan B. Muchin

N/A

David B. Small

N/A

*	Expected to commence operations on or about August 19, 2011.

Interested Trustee Ownership for the Calendar Year Ended December 31, 2010*

Name of Trustee

Columbia
Acorn
European
Fund**

Columbia
Acorn
Emerging
Markets
Fund**

Aggregate Dollar Range
of Equity Securities in
all Funds in the
Columbia Funds Family

Charles P. McQuaid**

N/A

Ralph Wanger**

N/A

*	Ownership information for 2010 is not shown for Mr. Rudis because he commenced service as a Trustee on January 1, 2011.

**	Expected to commence operations on or about August 19, 2011.

The Officers

The following table provides basic information about the officers of the Trust, other than Mr. McQuaid, as of the date of this SAI, including their principal occupations during the past five years, although their specific titles may have varied over the period. The mailing address of each officer is: c/o Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC, 227 West Monroe Street, Suite 3000, Chicago, Illinois 60606, except for Messrs. Clarke and DiMaria, whose address is Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC, 225 Franklin Street, Boston, MA 02110, and Messrs. Plummer and Petersen, whose address is Ameriprise Financial, Inc., 5060 Ameriprise Financial Center, Minneapolis, MN 55474.

Officer Biographical Information


Name and Age at July 31, 2011	Position with the Trust	Year First Appointed or Elected to Office*	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years
Ben Andrews, 45	Vice President	2004	Portfolio manager and analyst, Columbia WAM or its predecessors since 1998; Vice President, Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust since 2004.

Robert A. Chalupnik, 45	Vice President	2011	Portfolio manager and analyst, Columbia WAM or its predecessors since 1998. Vice President Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust since May 2011.

Michael G. Clarke, 41	Assistant Treasurer	2004	Vice President, Columbia Management since May 2010; Managing Director of Fund Administration, Columbia Management Advisors, LLC, from September 2004 to April 2010; senior officer of Columbia Funds and affiliated funds since 2002.

Joseph F. DiMaria, 42	Assistant Treasurer	2010	Vice President, Mutual Fund Administration, Columbia Management, since May 2010; Director of Fund Administration, Columbia Management Advisors, LLC from January 2006 to April 2010; Head of Tax/Compliance and Assistant Treasurer, Columbia Management Advisors, LLC, from November 2004 to December 2005.

P. Zachary Egan, 43	Vice President	2003	Director of International Research, Columbia WAM since December 2004; Vice President, Columbia Acorn Trust since 2003 and Wanger Advisors Trust since 2007; portfolio manager and analyst, Columbia WAM or its predecessors since 1999.


Name and Age at July 31, 2011	Position with the Trust	Year First Appointed or Elected to Office*	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years
John Kunka, 41	Assistant Treasurer	2006	Director of Accounting and Operations, Columbia WAM since May 2006; Manager of Mutual Fund Operations, Calamos Advisors, Inc. (investment adviser), September 2005-May 2006; prior thereto, Manager of Mutual Fund Administration, Van Kampen Investments.

Joseph C. LaPalm, 41	Vice President	2006	Chief Compliance Officer, Columbia WAM since 2005; prior thereto, compliance officer, William Blair & Company (investment firm).

Bruce H. Lauer, 54	Vice President, Secretary and Treasurer	1995	Chief Operating Officer, Columbia WAM or its predecessors since April 2000; Vice President, Treasurer and Secretary, Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust since 1995; Director, Wanger Investment Company PLC; formerly, Director, Banc of America Capital Management (Ireland) Ltd.; and formerly, Director, Bank of America Global Liquidity Funds, PLC.

Louis J. Mendes III, 47	Vice President	2003	Portfolio manager and analyst, Columbia WAM or its predecessors since 2001; Vice President, Columbia Acorn Trust since 2003 and Wanger Advisors Trust since 2005.

Robert A. Mohn, 49	Vice President	1997	Director of Domestic Research, Columbia WAM or its predecessors since March 2004; Vice President, Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust since 1997; portfolio manager and analyst, Columbia WAM or its predecessors since 1992. Mr. Mohn served as Principal Executive Officer of the Funds during Mr. McQuaid’s sabbatical from January 14 through March 31, 2011.


Name and Age at July 31, 2011	Position with the Trust	Year First Appointed or Elected to Office*	Principal Occupation(s) During the Past Five Years
Christopher J. Olson, 46	Vice President	2001	Portfolio manager and analyst, Columbia WAM or its predecessors since January 2001; Vice President, Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust since 2001.

Scott R. Plummer, 52	Assistant Secretary	2010	Chief Legal Officer and Assistant Secretary, Columbia Management (or its predecessors) since June 2005; Vice President and Lead Chief Counsel — Asset Management, Ameriprise Financial since May 2010 (previously Vice President and Chief Counsel — Asset Management, from 2005 to April 2010, and Vice President — Asset Management Compliance from 2004 to 2005); Vice President, Chief Counsel and Assistant Secretary, the Distributor (or its predecessors) since 2008; Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, Ameriprise Certificate Company since 2005; Chief Counsel, RiverSource Distributors, Inc. from 2006 to 2010; Vice President, General Counsel and Assistant Secretary, RiverSource Funds, since December 2006; Senior Vice President, Assistant Secretary and Chief Legal Officer, Columbia Funds Family of Funds since May 2010.

Christopher O. Petersen, 41	Assistant Secretary	2010	Vice President and Chief Counsel, Ameriprise Financial since January 2010 (formerly Vice President and Group Counsel or Counsel from April 2004 to January 2010); Assistant Secretary of RiverSource Funds since January 2007.

Robert P. Scales, 58	Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Senior Vice President and General Counsel	2004	Chief Compliance Officer, Chief Legal Officer, Senior Vice President and General Counsel, Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust since 2004.

Name and Age at July 31, 2011

Position with the Trust

Year First
Appointed or
Elected to Office*

Principal

Occupation(s) During

the Past Five Years

Linda Roth-Wiszowaty, 41

Assistant Secretary

2006

Business support analyst, Columbia WAM since April 2007; prior thereto, executive administrator, Columbia WAM or its predecessors, and executive assistant to the Chief Operating Officer, Columbia WAM or its predecessors.

BROKERAGE ALLOCATION AND OTHER PRACTICES

The Adviser places the orders for the purchase and sale of portfolio securities and options and futures contracts for the Funds, subject to the oversight of the Board. In doing so, it seeks to place buy and sell orders in a manner that is fair and reasonable to each Fund. The Adviser’s overriding objective in selecting brokers and dealers to effect portfolio transactions is to seek the best combination of net price and execution, provided that the Adviser may occasionally pay higher commissions to obtain research products and services as described below. The best net price, giving effect to brokerage commissions, if any, and other transaction costs, is an important factor in this decision; however, a number of other judgmental factors may also enter into the decision. These factors include the Adviser’s knowledge of negotiated commission rates currently available and other current transaction costs; the nature of the security being purchased or sold; the size of the transaction; the desired timing of the transaction; the actual and expected activity in the market for the particular security; confidentiality; the execution, clearance and settlement capabilities of the broker or dealer selected and others considered; the Adviser’s knowledge of the financial stability of the broker or dealer selected and such other brokers and dealers; evaluation of competing markets, including exchanges, over-the-counter markets, electronic communications networks (ECNs) or other alternative trading facilities; the broker’s or dealer’s responsiveness to the Adviser; the Adviser’s knowledge of actual or apparent operation problems of any broker or dealer, and the value of any research products or services provided by the broker/dealer.

Recognizing the value of those factors, the Adviser may cause a Fund to pay a brokerage commission in excess of what another broker may have charged for effecting the same transaction. The Adviser has discretion for all trades of the Funds. Those guidelines are reviewed and periodically modified, and the general level of brokerage commissions paid is periodically reviewed by the Adviser. Evaluations of the reasonableness of brokerage commissions, based on the factors described in the preceding paragraph, are made by the Adviser’s trading personnel while effecting portfolio transactions. The general level of brokerage commissions paid is reviewed by the Adviser, and reports are made at least annually to the Board.

The Adviser maintains and periodically updates a list of approved brokers and dealers that, in the Adviser’s judgment, are generally capable of providing best price and execution and are financially stable. The Adviser’s traders are directed to use only brokers and dealers on the approved list. The Adviser may place trades for the Funds through a registered broker/dealer that is an affiliate of the Adviser pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board. Such trades, for which the affiliate would receive a commission, will only be effected consistent with the Adviser’s obligation to seek best execution for its clients, in accordance with the Funds’ procedures adopted pursuant to Rule 17e-1 under the 1940 Act governing such transactions.

It is the Adviser’s practice, when feasible, to aggregate for execution as a single transaction orders for the purchase or sale of a particular security, with the same terms and conditions, for the accounts of several clients in order to seek a lower commission or more advantageous net price. All clients participating in the aggregated execution receive the same execution price and transaction costs are shared pro-rata, whenever possible.

Investment Research Products and Services Furnished by Brokers and Dealers

The Adviser engages in the long-standing practice in the money management industry of acquiring research and brokerage products and services, together, “research products”, from broker/dealer firms in return for directing trades for the Funds and other clients to those firms. In effect, the Adviser is using the commission dollars paid by its clients to pay for these research products. The money management industry uses the term “soft dollars” to refer to this industry practice. The Board reviews the Adviser’s soft dollar practices at least annually.

The Adviser has a duty to seek the best combination of net price and execution, provided that it may occasionally pay higher commissions to obtain research products and services as described below. The Adviser faces a potential conflict of interest with this duty when it uses client trades to obtain soft dollar products. This conflict exists because the Adviser is able to use the soft dollar products in managing its client accounts without paying cash (“hard dollars”) for the product, which reduces the Adviser’s cost of managing the accounts.

The practice of using soft dollars to obtain research products and services is explicitly sanctioned by a provision of the 1934 Act that creates a “safe harbor” for soft dollar transactions conducted in a specified manner. Moreover, under that provision, the Adviser is not required to use the soft dollar product in managing the accounts that generate the trade. Thus, a Fund that generates the brokerage commission used to acquire a soft dollar product will not necessarily benefit directly from that product. In effect, that Fund may be cross-subsidizing the Adviser’s management of the other Funds and other clients that do benefit directly from the product. Although it is inherently difficult if not impossible to document, the Adviser believes that over time each Fund benefits from soft dollar products such that cross subsidizations by each Fund and by other clients of the Adviser even out.

The Adviser attempts to reduce or eliminate this conflict by directing Fund trades for soft dollar products only if the Adviser concludes that the broker/dealer supplying the product is capable of providing a combination of the best net price and execution on the trade. As noted above, the best net price, while significant, is one of a number of judgmental factors the Adviser considers in determining whether a particular broker is capable of providing the best net price and execution. The Adviser may cause a Fund to pay a brokerage commission in a soft dollar trade in excess of that which another broker/dealer might have charged for the same transaction.

The Adviser acquires two types of soft dollar research products: (i) proprietary research created by the broker/dealer firm executing the trade and (ii) other research created by third parties that are supplied to the Adviser through the broker/dealer firm executing the trade.

Proprietary research consists primarily of traditional research reports, recommendations and similar materials produced by the in house research staffs of broker/dealer firms. This research includes evaluations and recommendations of specific companies or industry groups, as well as analyses of general economic and market conditions and trends, market data, contacts and other related information and assistance. The Adviser’s research analysts periodically rate the quality of proprietary research produced by various broker/dealer firms. Based on these evaluations, the Adviser develops target levels of commission dollars on a firm-by-firm basis. The Adviser attempts to direct trades to each such firm to meet those targets.

The Adviser also uses soft dollars to acquire research created by third parties that are supplied to the Adviser through broker/dealers executing the trade (or other broker/dealers who “step in” to a transaction and receive a portion of the brokerage commission for the trade).

The targets that the Adviser establishes for various broker/dealers for both proprietary and for third party research typically reflect discussions that the Adviser has with the broker/dealer providing the research regarding the level of commissions it expects to receive for the research. However, those targets, which are established on a calendar year basis, are not binding commitments, and the Adviser does not agree to direct a minimum amount of commissions to any broker/dealer for soft dollar research. In setting those targets, the Adviser makes a determination that the value of the research is reasonably commensurate with the cost of acquiring it. The Adviser will receive the research whether or not commissions directed to the applicable broker/dealer are less than, equal to or in excess of the target. The Adviser generally will carry over target shortages and excesses to the next year’s target. The Adviser believes that this practice reduces the conflicts of interest associated with soft dollar transactions, since the Adviser can meet the non-binding expectations of broker/dealers providing soft dollar research over flexible time periods. In the case of third party research, the third party is paid by the broker/dealer and not by the Adviser. The Adviser may enter into a contract allowing a third party vendor to use the research.

The Adviser also receives company-specific research for soft dollars from independent research organizations that are not brokers.

Consistent with industry practice and the safe harbor provided by the 1934 Act, the Adviser does not require that the Fund that generates the trade receive any benefit from the soft dollar product obtained through the trade.

As noted above, this may result in cross-subsidization of soft dollar products among various clients of the Adviser, including the Funds.

In certain instances, the Adviser pays for research products with commissions on trades executed through ECNs. The Adviser may direct a portion of the commissions from these trades to an introducing broker through a Commission Sharing Agreement (CSA). Where the Adviser has executed a CSA with an introducing broker, the Adviser will place a trade with the ECN, and pay the negotiated commission to the ECN. The ECN will then credit a negotiated portion of the commission to the introducing broker as requested by the Adviser for the purpose of funding a pool to be used to pay for research products or services received by the Adviser from other third parties. In addition, the ECN will credit a further portion of the commission negotiated by the ECN and the introducing broker to the introducing broker for its services in administrating the CSA. The ECN makes periodic lumpsum payments to the introducing broker. CSAs are a permitted form of soft dollar transaction under the 1934 Act.

In certain cases, the Adviser will direct a trade to one broker/dealer with the instruction that it execute the trade and pay over a portion of the commission from the trade to another broker/dealer who provides the Adviser with a soft dollar research product or service. The broker/dealer executing the trade “steps out” of a portion of the commission in favor of the other broker/dealer providing the soft dollar product. The Adviser may engage in step out transactions in order to direct soft dollar commissions to a broker/dealer which provides research but may not be able to provide best execution. Brokers who receive step out commissions typically are brokers providing third party soft dollar research that is not available on a hard dollars basis. The Adviser does not engage in step out transactions as a manner of compensating broker/dealers that sell shares of investment companies managed by the Adviser.

The Trust’s purchases and sales of securities not traded on securities exchanges generally are placed by the Adviser with market makers for those securities on a net basis, without any brokerage commissions being paid by the Trust. Net trading does involve, however, transaction costs. Included in the price paid to an underwriter of portfolio securities is the spread between the price paid by the underwriter to the issuer and the price paid by the purchasers. Each Fund’s purchases and sales of portfolio securities in the over-the-counter market usually are transacted with a broker/dealer on a net basis without any brokerage commission being paid by such Fund, but do reflect the spread between the bid and asked prices. The Adviser may also transact purchases of some portfolio securities directly with the issuers.

With respect to a Fund’s purchases and sales of portfolio securities transacted with a broker or dealer on a net basis, the Adviser may also consider the part, if any, played by the broker or dealer in bringing the security involved to the Adviser’s attention, including investment research related to the security and provided to the Fund.

Brokerage Commissions

In certain instances the Funds may pay brokerage commissions to broker/dealers that are affiliates of Ameriprise Financial. As indicated above, all such transactions involving the payment of brokerage commissions to affiliates are done in compliance with Rule 17e-1 under the 1940 Act. The Funds had not commenced operations as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and accordingly have no brokerage commission payments to report.

Directed Brokerage

The Funds or the Adviser, through an agreement or understanding with a broker/dealer, or otherwise through an internal allocation procedure, may direct, subject to applicable legal requirements, the Funds’ brokerage transactions to a broker/dealer because of the research services it provides the Funds or the Adviser.

The Funds had not commenced operations as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and accordingly have no directed brokerage transactions to report.

Securities of Regular Broker/Dealers

In certain cases, the Funds, as part of their principal investment strategies, or otherwise as a permissible investment, will invest in the common stock or debt obligations of the regular broker/dealers that the Adviser uses to transact brokerage for the Columbia Funds Family.

The Funds had not commenced operations as of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010 and accordingly have no holdings to report in securities of “regular brokers or dealers” or their parents, as defined in Rule 10b-1 under the 1940 Act.

Additional Shareholder Servicing Payments

The Funds, along with the Transfer Agent and/or the Distributor may pay significant amounts to selling and/or servicing agents (as defined below), including other Ameriprise Financial affiliates, for providing the types of services that would typically be provided directly by a mutual fund’s transfer agent. The level of payments made to selling and/or servicing agents may vary. A number of factors may be considered in determining payments to a selling and/or servicing agent, including, without limitation, the nature of the services provided to shareholders or retirement plan participants that invest in the Funds through retirement plans. These services may include sub-accounting, sub-transfer agency or similar recordkeeping services, shareholder or participant reporting, shareholder or participant transaction processing, and/or the provision of call center support (additional shareholder services). These payments for shareholder servicing support vary by selling and/or servicing agent but generally are not expected, with certain limited exceptions, to exceed 0.40% of the average aggregate value of each Fund’s shares in the program on an annual basis for those classes of shares that pay a service fee pursuant to a Rule 12b-1 Plan, and 0.45% of the average aggregate value of each Fund’s shares in the program on an annual basis for those classes of shares that do not pay a service fee pursuant to a Rule 12b-1 Plan. The Board has authorized each Fund to pay up to 0.05% of the average aggregate value of the Fund’s shares.

Such payments will be made by the Transfer Agent, and the Funds will reimburse the Transfer Agent the amount of such payments to the selling and/or servicing agent for the provision of such additional shareholder services. The Funds’ Transfer Agent, Distributor or their affiliates will pay, from its or their own resources, amounts in excess of the amount paid by the Funds to selling and/or servicing agents in connection with the provision of these additional shareholder services and other services.

For purposes of this section the term “selling and/or servicing agent” includes any broker/dealer, bank, bank trust department, registered investment adviser, financial planner, retirement plan or other third party administrator and any other institution having a selling, services or any similar agreement with the Distributor and other Ameriprise Financial affiliates.

The Funds also may make additional payments to selling and/or servicing agents that charge networking fees for certain services provided in connection with the maintenance of shareholder accounts through the NSCC.

In addition, the Distributor and other Ameriprise Financial affiliates may make lump sum payments to selected selling and/or servicing agents receiving shareholder servicing payments in reimbursement of printing costs for literature for participants, account maintenance fees or fees for establishment of the Funds on the selling and/or servicing agent’s system or other similar services.

As of the date of this SAI, the Distributor and/or other Ameriprise Financial affiliates had agreed to make shareholder servicing payments to the selling and/or servicing agents or their affiliates shown below. Columbia Acorn European Fund and Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund are expected to commence operations on or about August 19, 2011; accordingly, neither the Distributor nor any other Ameriprise Financial affiliate has yet made shareholder servicing payments with respect to these Funds.

Recipients of Shareholder Servicing Payments relating to the Funds from the Distributor and/or other Ameriprise Financial affiliates

• Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc.

• ADP Broker-Dealer, Inc.

• Ascensus, Inc.

• AXA Advisors

• Bank of America, N.A.

• Benefit Plan Administrators

• Charles Schwab & Co., Inc.

• Charles Schwab Trust Co.

• Davenport & Company

• City National Bank

• CPI Qualified Plan Consultants, Inc.

• Daily Access Concepts, Inc.

• Digital Retirement Solutions

• Edward D. Jones & Co., LP

• E*Trade Group, Inc.

• ExpertPlan

• Fidelity Investments Institutional Operations Co.

• First National Bank of Omaha

• Guardian Life and Annuity Company Inc.

• Genworth Life and Annuity Insurance Company

• GWFS Equities, Inc.

• Hartford Life Insurance Company

• Hartford Securities Distribution

• Hewitt Associates LLC

• ICMA Retirement Corporation

• ING Life Insurance and Annuity Company

• ING Institutional Plan Services, LLP

• Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc.

• John Hancock Life Insurance Company (USA)

• John Hancock Life Insurance Company of New York

• JP Morgan Retirement Plan Services LLC

• Lincoln Retirement Services

• LPL Financial Corporation

• Marshall & Illsley Trust Company

• Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Company

• Matrix Settlement & Clearance Services

• Mercer HR Services, LLC

• Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company

• Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated

• Mid Atlantic Capital Corporation

• Morgan Stanley Smith Barney

• Morgan Keegan & Company

• Newport Retirement Services, Inc.

• New York State Deferred Compensation Plan

• NYLife Distributors LLC

• Pension Specialists

• PNC Bank

• Princeton Retirement Group

• Principal Life Insurance Company of America

• Prudential Insurance Company of America

• Prudential Retirement Insurance & Annuity Company

• Pershing LLC

• Raymond James & Associates

• RBC Dain Rauscher

• Reliance Trust

• Standard Insurance Company

• Stifel Nicolaus & Co.

• Deferred Compensation Board of the State of New York

• TD Ameritrade Clearing, Inc.

• TD Ameritrade Trust Company

• The Retirement Plan Company

• Teachers Insurance and Annuity Association of America

• T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.

• UMB Bank

• Unified Trust Company, N.A.

• Upromise Investments, Inc.

• USAA Investment Management Co

• Vanguard Group, Inc.

• VALIC Retirement Services Company

• Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

• Wells Fargo Funds Management, LLC

• Wilmington Trust Company

• Wilmington Trust Retirement & Institutional Services Company

The Distributor and/or other Ameriprise Financial affiliates may enter into similar arrangements with other selling and/or servicing agents from time to time. Therefore, the preceding list is subject to change at any time without notice.

Additional Selling and/or Servicing Agent Payments

Selling and/or servicing agents may receive different commissions, sales charge reallowances and other payments with respect to sales of different classes of shares of the Funds. These other payments may include servicing payments to retirement plan administrators and other institutions at rates up to those described above under Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices — Additional Shareholder Servicing Payments. For purposes of this section the term “selling and/or servicing agent” includes any broker/dealer, bank, bank trust department, registered investment adviser, financial planner, retirement plan or other third party administrator and any other institution having a selling, services or any similar agreement with the Distributor and other Ameriprise Financial affiliates.

The Distributor and its affiliates may pay additional compensation to selected selling and/or servicing agents, including other Ameriprise Financial affiliates, under the categories described below. These categories are not mutually exclusive, and a single selling and/or servicing agent may receive payments under all categories. A selling and/or servicing agent also may receive payments described above in Brokerage Allocation and Other Practices — Additional Shareholder Servicing Payments. These payments may create an incentive for a selling and/or servicing agent or its representatives to recommend or offer shares of a Fund to its customers. The amount of payments made to selling and/or servicing agents may vary. In determining the amount of payments to be made, the Distributor and its affiliates may consider a number of factors, including, without limitation, asset mix and length or relationship with the selling and/or servicing agent, the size of the customer/shareholder base of the selling and/or servicing agent, the manner in which customers of the selling and/or servicing agent make investments in the Funds, the nature and scope of marketing support or services provided by the selling and/or servicing agent (as described more fully below) and the costs incurred by the selling and/or servicing agent in connection with maintaining the infrastructure necessary or desirable to support investments in the Funds.

These additional payments by the Distributor and its affiliates are made pursuant to agreements between the Distributor and its affiliates and selling and/or servicing agents, and do not change the price paid by investors for the purchase of a share, the amount a Fund will receive as proceeds from such sales or the distribution fees and expenses paid by the Fund as shown under the heading Fees and Expenses in the Fund’s prospectuses.

Marketing Support Payments

The Distributor and its affiliates may make payments, from their own resources, to certain selling and/or servicing agents, including other Ameriprise Financial affiliates, for marketing support services relating to the Columbia Funds, including, but not limited to, business planning assistance, educating selling and/or servicing agent personnel about the Funds and shareholder financial planning needs, placement on the selling and/or servicing agent’s preferred or recommended fund list or otherwise identifying the Funds as being part of a complex to be accorded a higher degree of marketing support than complexes not making such payments, access to sales meetings, sales representatives and management representatives of the selling and/or servicing agent, client servicing and systems infrastructure support. These payments are generally based upon one or more of the following factors: average net assets of the Columbia Funds distributed by the Distributor attributable to that selling and/or servicing agent, gross sales of the Columbia Funds distributed by the Distributor attributable to that selling and/or servicing agent, reimbursement of ticket charges (fees that a selling and/or servicing agent firm charges its representatives for effecting transactions in Fund shares) or a negotiated lump sum payment.

While the financial arrangements may vary for each selling and/or servicing agent, the marketing support payments to each selling and/or servicing agent generally are expected to be between 0.05% and 0.50% on an annual basis for payments based on average net assets of the Funds attributable to the selling and/or servicing agent, and between 0.05% and 0.25% on an annual basis for firms receiving a payment based on gross sales of the Columbia Funds attributable to the selling and/or servicing agent. The Distributor and affiliates may make payments in larger amounts or on a basis other than those described above when dealing with certain selling and/or servicing agents. Such increased payments may enable such selling and/or servicing agents to offset credits that they may provide to their customers.

As of the date of this SAI, the Distributor, Columbia WAM or their affiliates had agreed to make marketing support payments relating to the Funds to the selling and/or servicing agents or their affiliates shown below. Columbia Acorn European Fund and Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund are expected to commence operations on or about August 19, 2011; accordingly, neither the Distributor, Columbia WAM nor any affiliate has yet made marketing supports payments with respect to these Funds.


*Recipients of Marketing Support Payments relating to the Funds from the Distributor and/or other Ameriprise Financial affiliates*

• AIG Advisor Group • Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. • AXA Advisors, LLC • Commonwealth Financial Network • Fidelity Brokerage Services, Inc. • J.J.B. Hilliard, W.L. Lyons, Inc. • J.P. Morgan Chase Clearing Corp. • Lincoln Financial Advisors Corp. • Linsco/Private Ledger Corp. • Morgan Stanley Smith Barney • Merrill Lynch Life Insurance Company		• Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated • Pershing LLC • Prudential Investment Management Services, LLC • Raymond James & Associates, Inc. • Raymond James Financial Services, Inc. • UBS Financial Services Inc. • Wells Fargo Advisors • Wells Fargo Investments, LLC • Vanguard Marketing Corp

The Distributor Columbia WAM and/or their affiliates may enter into similar arrangements with other selling and/or servicing agents from time to time. Therefore, the preceding list is subject to change at any time without notice.

Other Payments

From time to time, the Distributor, from its own resources, may provide additional compensation to certain selling and/or servicing agents that sell or arrange for the sale of shares of the Funds to the extent not prohibited by laws or the rules of any self-regulatory agency, such as the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA). Such compensation provided by the Distributor may include financial assistance to selling and/or servicing agents that enable the Distributor to participate in and/or present at selling and/or servicing agent-sponsored conferences or seminars, sales or training programs for invited registered representatives and other selling and/or servicing agent employees, selling and/or servicing agent entertainment and other selling and/or servicing agent-sponsored events, and travel expenses, including lodging incurred by registered representatives and other employees in connection with prospecting, retention and due diligence trips. The Distributor makes payments for entertainment events it deems appropriate, subject to the Distributor’s internal guidelines and applicable law. These payments may vary depending upon the nature of the event.

Your selling and/or servicing agent may charge you fees or commissions in addition to those disclosed in this SAI. You should consult with your selling and/or servicing agent and review carefully any disclosure your selling and/or servicing agent provides regarding its services and compensation. Depending on the financial arrangement in place at any particular time, a selling and/or servicing agent and its financial consultants may have a financial incentive for recommending a particular Fund or a particular share class over other funds or share classes. See Investment Advisory and Other Services — Other Roles and Relationships of Ameriprise Financial and its Affiliates — Certain Conflicts of Interest for more information.

CAPITAL STOCK AND OTHER SECURITIES

Description of the Trust’s Shares

The Funds offer shares in the classes shown in the table below. Subject to certain limited exceptions discussed in each Fund’s prospectuses, a Fund or share class may no longer be accepting new investments from current shareholders or prospective investors. A Fund may, at any time and without notice, offer or stop offering any share class to the general public for investment.

The Trust’s Declaration of Trust permits it to issue an unlimited number of full and fractional shares of beneficial interest of each Fund, without par value, and to divide or combine the shares of any series into a greater or lesser number of shares of that Fund without thereby changing the proportionate beneficial interests in that Fund and to divide such shares into classes. Each share of a class of a Fund represents an equal proportional interest in that Fund with each other share in the same class and is entitled to such distributions out of the income earned on the assets belonging to that Fund as are declared in the discretion of the Board. However, different share classes of a Fund pay different distribution amounts because each share class has different expenses. Each time a distribution is made, the net asset value (NAV) per share of the share class is reduced by the amount of the distribution.

Share Classes Offered by the Funds


Fund	Class A Shares	Class C Shares	Class I Shares	Class Z Shares
Columbia Acorn European Fund	ü	ü	ü	ü
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund	ü	ü	ü	ü

Restrictions on Holding or Disposing of Shares

There are no restrictions on the right of shareholders to retain or dispose of the Funds’ shares, other than the possible future termination of the Funds. The Funds may be terminated by reorganization into another mutual fund or by liquidation and distribution of their assets. Unless terminated by reorganization or liquidation, the Fund will continue indefinitely.

Liability

Under Massachusetts law, shareholders could, under certain circumstances, be held personally liable for the obligations of the Trust. However, the Trust’s Declaration of Trust disclaims any shareholder liability for acts or obligations of the Funds and the Trust and requires that notice of such disclaimer be given in each agreement, obligation, or instrument entered into or executed by a Fund or the Trustees. The Declaration of Trust provides for indemnification out of Fund property for all loss and expense of any shareholder held personally liable for the obligations of a Fund. Thus, the risk of a shareholder incurring financial loss on account of shareholder liability is limited to circumstances (which are considered remote) in which a Fund would be unable to meet its obligations and the disclaimer was inoperative. The risk of a Fund incurring financial loss on account of another series of the Trust also is believed to be remote, because it would be limited to circumstances in which the disclaimer was inoperative and the other series of the Trust was unable to meet its obligations.

Dividend Rights

The shareholders of a Fund are entitled to receive any dividends or other distributions declared for the Fund. No shares have priority or preference over any other shares of a Fund with respect to distributions. Distributions will be made from the assets of a Fund, and will be paid pro rata to all shareholders of the Fund (or class) according to the number of shares of the Fund (or class) held by shareholders on the record date. The amount of

income dividends per share may vary between separate share classes of a Fund based upon differences in the way that expenses are allocated between share classes pursuant to a multiple class plan under Rule 18f-3 under the 1940 Act.

Voting Rights and Shareholder Meetings

As described in About the Trust, the Trust is not required to hold annual shareholder meetings, but special meetings may be called for certain purposes. The Trust voluntarily adheres to certain governance measures contemplated by the SEC’s Order, designed to maintain the independence of the Board, including holding a meeting of shareholders to elect trustees at least every five years. The Trust last held a shareholder meeting to elect Trustees on May 27, 2010.

The Trustees may fill any vacancies on the Board except that the Trustees may not fill a vacancy if, immediately after filling such vacancy, fewer than two-thirds of the Trustees then in office would have been elected to such office by the shareholders. In addition, at such times as fewer than a majority of the Trustees then in office have been elected to such office by the shareholders, the Trustees must call a meeting of shareholders. Trustees may be removed from office by a vote of the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares at a meeting duly called for the purpose, or otherwise as specified in the Trust’s organizational documents. Except as otherwise disclosed in a Fund’s prospectuses and this SAI, the Trustees shall continue to hold office and may appoint their successors.

At any shareholders’ meetings that may be held, shareholders of all series would vote together, irrespective of series, on the election of Trustees, but each series would vote separately from the others on other matters, such as changes in the investment policies of that series or the approval of the management agreement for that series. Shares of the Fund and any other series of the Trust that may be in existence from time to time generally vote together except when required by law to vote separately by Fund or by class.

Liquidation Rights

In the event of the liquidation or dissolution of the Trust or the Funds, shareholders of the Funds are entitled to receive the assets attributable to the relevant class of shares of the Funds that are available for distribution and to a distribution of any general assets not attributable to a particular investment portfolio that are available for distribution in such manner and on such basis as the Board may determine.

Preemptive Rights

There are no preemptive rights associated with Fund shares.

Conversion Rights

Shareholders have the right, which is subject to change by the Board, to convert or “exchange” shares of one class for another. Such right is outlined and subject to certain conditions set forth in each Fund’s prospectuses.

Redemptions

Each Fund’s dividend, distribution and redemption policies can be found in its prospectuses under the headings Buying, Selling and Exchanging Shares and Distributions and Taxes. The Trust may not suspend shareholders’ right of redemption or postpone payment for more than seven days unless the NYSE is closed for other than customary weekends or holidays, or if permitted by the rules of the SEC during periods when trading on the NYSE is restricted or during any emergency which makes it impracticable for the Funds to dispose of their securities or to determine fairly the value of its net assets, or during any other period permitted by order of the SEC for the protection of investors.

Sinking Fund Provisions

The Trust has no sinking fund provisions.

Calls or Assessment

All Fund shares are issued in uncertificated form only and when issued will be fully paid and non-assessable by the Trust.

PURCHASE, REDEMPTION AND PRICING OF SHARES

Purchase and Redemption

An investor may buy, sell and exchange shares in the Funds utilizing the methods, and subject to the restrictions, described in the Funds’ prospectuses. The following information supplements the information in the Funds’ prospectuses.

The Funds have authorized one or more broker/dealers to accept buy and sell orders on the Funds’ behalf. These broker/dealers are authorized to designate other intermediaries to accept buy and sell orders on the Funds’ behalf. The Funds will be deemed to have received a buy or sell order when an authorized broker/dealer, or, if applicable, a broker/dealer’s authorized designee, accepts the order. Customer orders will be priced at each Fund’s net asset value (NAV) next computed after they are accepted by an authorized broker/dealer or the broker’s authorized designee.

The Trust also may honor redemption requests with in-kind distributions of readily marketable securities or other property if it is appropriate to do so in light of the Trust’s responsibilities under the 1940 Act.

Under the 1940 Act, the Funds may suspend the right of redemption or postpone the date of payment for shares during any period when (i) trading on the NYSE is restricted by applicable rules and regulations of the SEC; (ii) the NYSE is closed for other than customary weekend and holiday closings; (iii) the SEC has by order permitted such suspension; (iv) an emergency exists as determined by the SEC. (The Funds may also suspend or postpone the recordation of the transfer of their shares upon the occurrence of any of the foregoing conditions).

The Trust has elected to be governed by Rule 18f-1 under the 1940 Act, as a result of which each Fund is obligated to redeem shares, subject to the exceptions listed above, with respect to any one shareholder during any 90-day period, solely in cash up to the lesser of $250,000 or 1% of the NAV of each Fund at the beginning of the period.

The Trust does not have any arrangements with shareholders or other individuals that would permit frequent purchases or redemptions of Fund shares.

The timing and magnitude of cash inflows from investors buying Fund shares could prevent a Fund from always being fully invested. Conversely, the timing and magnitude of cash outflows to investors redeeming Fund shares could require large ready reserves of uninvested cash to meet shareholder redemptions. Either situation could adversely impact a Fund’s performance.

Potential Adverse Effects of Large Investors

Each Fund may from time to time sell to one or more investors, including other funds advised by the Adviser or third parties, a substantial amount of its shares, and may thereafter be required to satisfy redemption requests by such investors. Such sales and redemptions may be very substantial relative to the size of the Fund. While it is not possible to predict the overall effect of such sales and redemptions over time, such transactions may adversely affect the Fund’s performance to the extent that the Fund is required to invest cash received in connection with a sale or to sell portfolio securities to facilitate a redemption at, in either case, a time when the Fund otherwise would not invest or sell. Such transactions also may increase a Fund’s transaction costs, which would detract from Fund performance. If a Fund is forced to sell portfolio securities that have appreciated in value, such sales may accelerate the realization of taxable income.

Tax-Advantaged Retirement Plans (Retirement Plans)

The Transfer Agent maintains prototype tax-qualified plans, including Pension and Profit-Sharing Plans, for individuals, corporations, employees and the self-employed. The minimum initial Retirement Plan investment is $1,000, applied at the plan level. Bank of America, National Association (BANA) is the custodian/trustee and plan sponsor of the Columbia Management prototype plans offered through the Distributor. In general a $20 annual fee is charged to participants in BANA sponsored Retirement Plans.

Participants in Retirement Plans not sponsored by BANA, not including IRAs, may be subject to an annual fee of $20 unless the Retirement Plan maintains an omnibus account with the Transfer Agent. Participants in BANA sponsored prototype plans (other than IRAs) who liquidate the total value of their account may also be charged a $20 close-out processing fee payable to the Transfer Agent. The close-out fee applies to plans opened after September 1, 1996. The fee is in addition to any applicable CDSC. The fee will not apply if the participant uses the proceeds to open a Columbia Management IRA Rollover account in any fund distributed by the Distributor, or if the Retirement Plan maintains an omnibus account.

Consultation with a competent financial advisor regarding these Retirement Plans and consideration of the suitability of fund shares as an investment under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 or otherwise is recommended.

Privileges of Insurance Company Separate Accounts

Class A shares of a Fund may be sold to an insurance company separate account without the imposition of a front-end sales charge provided that the following conditions are met:

•

The insurance company separate account is either (i) structured as a pool of IRA accounts managed by a sponsoring insurance company or (ii) for the benefit of group retirement plans;

•

The sponsoring insurance company makes shares of the Fund available to its contract owners/investors without the imposition of a sales charge; and

•

The sponsoring insurance company provides services to the investors in the insurance company separate account, including recordkeeping and administrative services, for which the sponsoring insurance company would be compensated by the Trust’s service providers and not by the Fund.

Additional Information about Investing in the Funds

Refer to the Funds’ prospectuses for details regarding how to buy, sell and exchange shares of the Funds.

The investment minimums for the Funds’ various share classes are set forth in the Funds’ prospectuses. Additional information about each of the Funds’ share classes and choosing among them is set forth in Appendix D.

Anti-Money Laundering Compliance

The Funds are required to comply with various anti-money laundering laws and regulations. Consequently, the Funds may request additional required information from you to verify your identity. Your application will be rejected if it does not contain your name, social security number, date of birth and permanent street address. If at any time the Funds believe a shareholder may be involved in suspicious activity or if certain account information matches information on government lists of suspicious persons, the Funds may choose not to establish a new account or may be required to “freeze” a shareholder’s account. The Funds also may be required to provide a governmental agency with information about transactions that have occurred in a shareholder’s account or to transfer monies received to establish a new account, transfer an existing account or transfer the proceeds of an existing account to a governmental agency. In some circumstances, the law may not permit the Funds to inform the shareholder that it has taken the actions described above.

Offering Price

Each Fund determines its net asset value (NAV) per share for each class, which is calculated separately for each class of shares as of the close of regular trading on the NYSE (generally 4:00 p.m. Eastern time). Currently, the NYSE is closed Saturdays, Sundays and the following holidays: New Year’s Day, Martin Luther King, Jr. Day, Presidents’ Day, Good Friday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. NAV will not be determined on days when the NYSE is closed unless, in the judgment of the Board, the NAV of a Fund should be determined on any such day, in which case the determination will be made at 4:00 p.m. Eastern time.

To calculate the NAV on a given day, a Fund values each stock listed or traded on a stock exchange at its latest sale price on that day. If there are no sales that day, a Fund values the security at the most recently quoted bid price. A Fund values each over-the-counter security as of the last sale price for that day. If a security is traded principally on NASDAQ, the SEC approved NASDAQ official closing price is applied. When the market price of a security is not readily available, including on days when a Fund determines that the sale or bid price of the security does not reflect that security’s market value, a Fund values the security at a fair value determined in good faith under procedures established by the Board.

A Fund values a security at a fair value when an event has occurred after the last available market price and before the close of the NYSE that is expected to materially affect the security’s price. In the case of foreign securities, this could include events occurring after the close of the foreign market where the securities are traded and before the close of the NYSE. When a security is valued at a fair value, the value may be higher or lower than the value used by another fund that uses market quotations to price the same securities. The Trust has retained a systematic independent fair value pricing service to assist in the fair valuation process for securities principally traded in a foreign market in order to adjust for possible changes in value that may occur between the close of the foreign exchange and the time at which NAV is determined. The use of a systematic independent fair value pricing service is intended to and may decrease the opportunities for time zone arbitrage transactions. There can be no assurance that the use of an independent fair value pricing service will successfully decrease arbitrage opportunities. If a security is valued at a “fair value,” that value may be different from the last quoted market price for that security. The Fund’s foreign securities may trade on days when the NYSE is closed.

Shares of the Portfolio Funds are valued at their respective NAVs. The Portfolio Funds generally value securities in their portfolios for which market quotations are readily available at the current market values of those securities (generally the last reported sale price) and all other securities and assets at fair value pursuant to methods established in good faith by the board of directors or trustees of each Portfolio Fund. If market quotations of Portfolio Funds are not readily available, or if a quotation is determined not to represent a fair value, management will use a method that the Portfolio Fund’s board believes to accurately reflect a fair value.

Each day, newspapers and other reporting services may publish the share prices of mutual funds at the close of business on the previous day. Certain of the Funds and the Portfolio Funds may invest in securities which are primarily listed on foreign exchanges, and therefore may experience trading and changes in NAV on days on which the Funds do not determine NAV due to differences in closing policies among exchanges. This may significantly affect the NAV of a Fund or Portfolio Fund on days when an investor cannot redeem such securities. Debt securities generally are valued by a pricing service which determines valuations based upon market transactions for normal, institutional-size trading units of similar securities. However, in circumstances where such prices are not available or where the Adviser deems it appropriate to do so, an over-the-counter or exchange bid quotation is used. Securities listed on an exchange or on NASDAQ are valued at the last sale price (or the official closing price as determined by the NASDAQ system, if different, as applicable). Listed securities for which there were no sales during the day and unlisted securities are valued at the last quoted bid price. Options are valued at the last sale price or, in the absence of a sale, the mean between the last quoted bid and offering prices. Short-term obligations with a maturity of 60 days or less are valued at amortized cost pursuant to procedures adopted by the Board. The values of foreign securities quoted in foreign currencies are translated into U.S. dollars at the exchange rate on that day. Fund positions for which market quotations are not readily available

and other assets are valued at a fair value as determined by the Valuation Committee in good faith under the procedures approved by of the Board.

Generally, trading in certain securities (such as foreign securities) is substantially completed each day at various times prior to the close of the NYSE. Trading on certain foreign securities markets may not take place on all business days in New York, and trading on some foreign securities markets takes place on days which are not business days in New York and on which a Fund’s NAV is not calculated. The values of these securities used in determining the NAV are computed as of such times. Also, because of the amount of time required to collect and process trading information as to large numbers of securities issues, the values of certain securities (such as convertible bonds, U.S. Government securities, and tax-exempt securities) are determined based on market quotations collected earlier in the day at the latest practicable time prior to the close of the NYSE. Occasionally, events affecting the value of such a security may occur between such times and the close of the NYSE which may affect the value of the security. Circumstances in which fair value pricing may be utilized include, but are not limited to: (i) when a significant event has occurred that may affect the securities of a single issuer, such as a merger, bankruptcy or significant issuer specific development; (ii) when a significant event has occurred that may affect an entire market, such as a natural disaster or significant governmental action; and (iii) when a non-significant event has occurred such as a market’s closing early or not opening, security trading halt or pricing of a nonvalued, restricted or nonpublic security.

TAXATION

The following information supplements and should be read in conjunction with the section in the Funds’ prospectuses entitled Distributions and Taxes. The prospectuses generally describe the U.S. federal income tax treatment of distributions by the Funds. This section of the SAI provides additional information concerning U.S. federal income taxes. It is based on the Code, applicable U.S. Treasury Regulations, judicial authority, and administrative rulings and practice, all as in effect as of the printing of this SAI, and all of which are subject to change, including changes with retroactive effect. The following discussion does not address state, local or foreign tax matters.

A shareholder’s tax treatment may vary depending upon his or her particular situation. This discussion applies only to shareholders holding Fund shares as capital assets within the meaning of the Code. Except as otherwise noted, it may not apply to certain types of shareholders who may be subject to special rules, such as insurance companies, tax-exempt organizations, shareholders holding Fund shares through tax-advantaged accounts (such as 401(k) Plan Accounts, Individual Retirement Accounts, variable annuity contracts or variable life insurance contracts), financial institutions, broker-dealers, entities that are not organized under the laws of the United States or a political subdivision thereof, persons who are neither citizens nor residents of the United States, shareholders holding Fund shares as part of a hedge, straddle, or conversion transaction, and shareholders who are subject to the federal alternative minimum tax. Investors investing through variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies should be aware that an investment in the Fund is expected to be treated as one investment for purposes of the “adequate diversification” requirements of Code Section 817 and the Treasury Regulations thereunder. Such investors are encouraged to consult their tax advisors and financial planners as to the tax consequences of investing in the Fund, including any potential adverse impact on the favorable tax treatment of their variable contract or policy.

The Trust has not requested and will not request an advance ruling from the IRS as to the U.S. federal income tax matters described below. The IRS could adopt positions contrary to those discussed below and such positions could be sustained. In addition, the following discussion and the discussions in the prospectuses applicable to each shareholder address only some of the U.S. federal income tax considerations generally affecting investments in the Funds. Prospective shareholders are urged to consult with their own tax advisors and financial planners regarding the U.S. federal tax consequences of an investment in a Fund, the application of state, local, or foreign laws, and the effect of any possible changes in applicable tax laws on their investment in the Funds.

Qualification as a Regulated Investment Company

It is intended that each Fund qualify as a “regulated investment company” under Subchapter M of Subtitle A, Chapter 1 of the Code. Each Fund will be treated as a separate entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Thus, the provisions of the Code applicable to regulated investment companies generally will apply separately to each Fund, even though each Fund is a series of the Trust. Furthermore, each Fund will separately determine its income, gains, losses, and expenses for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

In order to qualify for the special tax treatment accorded regulated investment companies and their shareholders under the Code, each Fund must, among other things, derive at least 90% of its gross income each taxable year generally from (i) dividends, interest, certain payments with respect to securities loans, gains from the sale or other disposition of stock, securities or foreign currencies, and other income attributable to its business of investing in such stock, securities or foreign currencies (including, but not limited to, gains from options, futures or forward contracts) and (ii) net income derived from an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership, as defined below. In general, for purposes of this 90% gross income requirement, income derived from a partnership will be treated as qualifying income only to the extent such income is attributable to items of income of the partnership which would be qualifying income if realized directly by the regulated investment company. However, 100% of the net income derived from an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership

(defined as a partnership that (a) the interests in which are traded on an established securities market or readily tradable on a secondary market or the substantial equivalent thereof, (b) that derives at least 90% of its income from the passive income sources defined in Code Section 7704(d), and (c) that derives less than 90% of its income from the qualifying income described in clause (i) above) will be treated as qualifying income. Certain of a Fund’s investments in master limited partnerships (MLPs) may qualify as interests in qualified publicly traded partnerships. In addition, although in general the passive activity rules do not apply to a regulated investment company, such rules do apply to a regulated investment company with respect to items attributable to an interest in a qualified publicly traded partnership.

Each Fund must also diversify its holdings so that, at the end of each quarter of a Fund’s taxable year: (i) at least 50% of the fair market value of its total assets consists of (A) cash and cash items (including receivables), U.S. Government securities and securities of other regulated investment companies, and (B) securities of any one issuer (other than those described in clause (A)) to the extent such securities do not exceed 5% of the value of the Fund’s total assets and are not more than 10% of the outstanding voting securities of such issuer, and (ii) not more than 25% of the value of the Fund’s total assets consists of the securities of any one issuer (other than those described in clause (i)(A)), the securities of two or more issuers the Fund controls and which are engaged in the same, similar, or related trades or businesses, or the securities of one or more qualified publicly traded partnerships. In addition, for purposes of meeting this diversification requirement, the term “outstanding voting securities of such issuer” includes the equity securities of a qualified publicly traded partnership and in the case of a Fund’s investments in loan participations, the Fund shall treat both the financial intermediary and the issuer of the underlying loan as an issuer. The qualifying income and diversification requirements described above may limit the extent to which a Fund can engage in certain derivative transactions, including, but not limited to, options, futures contracts and swap agreements, as well as the extent to which it can invest in MLPs.

In addition, each Fund generally must distribute to its shareholders at least 90% of its investment company taxable income for the taxable year, which generally includes its ordinary income and the excess of any net short-term capital gain over net long-term capital loss, and at least 90% of its net tax-exempt interest income (if any) for the taxable year.

If a Fund qualifies as a regulated investment company, it generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on any of the investment company taxable income and net capital gain (i.e., the excess of net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss) it distributes to its shareholders (including Capital Gains Dividends, as defined below). Each Fund generally intends to distribute at least annually its investment company taxable income (computed without regard to the dividends-paid deduction) and substantially all of its capital gain. However, no assurance can be given that a Fund will not be subject to U.S. federal income taxation. Any investment company taxable income retained by a Fund will be subject to tax at regular corporate rates.

In addition, although each Fund generally intends to distribute all of its net capital gain, a Fund may determine to retain for investment all or a portion of its net capital gain. If a Fund retains any net capital gain, it will be subject to a tax at regular corporate rates on the amount retained, but may designate the retained amount as undistributed capital gains in a notice to its shareholders, who (i) will be required to include in income for U.S. federal income tax purposes, as long-term capital gain, their shares of such undistributed amount, and (ii) will be entitled to credit their proportionate shares of the tax paid by the Fund on such undistributed amount against their U.S. federal income tax liabilities, if any, and to claim refunds to the extent the credit exceeds such liabilities. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, the tax basis of shares owned by a shareholder of a Fund will be increased by an amount equal under current law to the difference between the amount of undistributed capital gains included in the shareholder’s gross income under clause (i) of the preceding sentence and the tax deemed paid by the shareholder under clause (ii) of the preceding sentence.

In determining its net capital gain for Capital Gain Dividend purposes, a regulated investment company generally must treat any net capital loss or any net long-term capital loss incurred after December 31 of a given year as if it had been incurred in the succeeding year. U.S. Treasury Regulations permit a regulated investment

company, in determining its taxable income, to elect to treat all or part of any net capital loss, any net long-term capital loss or any foreign currency loss incurred after December 31 as if it had been incurred in the succeeding year.

In order to comply with the distribution requirements described above applicable to regulated investment companies, a Fund generally must make the distributions in the same taxable year in which it realizes the income and gain, although in certain circumstances, a Fund may make the distributions in the following taxable year in respect of income and gains from the prior taxable year. If a Fund declares a distribution to shareholders of record in October, November or December of one calendar year and pays the distribution by January 31 of the following calendar year, however, the Fund and its shareholders will be treated as if the Fund paid the distribution by December 31 of the earlier year.

If, for any taxable year, a Fund fails to qualify as a regulated investment company under the Code, it will be taxed in the same manner as an ordinary corporation without any deduction for its distributions to shareholders, and all distributions from the Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and profits (including any distributions of its net tax-exempt income and net long-term capital gains) to its shareholders will be taxable to shareholders as dividend income. In addition, the Fund could be required to recognize unrealized gains, pay substantial taxes and interest and make substantial distributions before requalifying as a regulated investment company.

Excise Tax

If a Fund fails to distribute by December 31 of each calendar year at least the sum of 98% of its ordinary income for that year (excluding capital gains and losses) and 98% of its capital gain net income (adjusted for net ordinary losses) for the 1-year period ending on October 31 of that year, and any of its ordinary income or capital gain net income from previous years that was not distributed during such years, the Fund will be subject to a nondeductible 4% excise tax on the undistributed amounts. For these purposes, a Fund will be treated as having distributed any amount on which it has been subject to corporate income tax in the taxable year ending within the calendar year. Each Fund generally intends to actually distribute or be deemed to have distributed substantially all of its ordinary income and capital gain net income, if any, by the end of each calendar year and, thus, expects not to be subject to the excise tax. However, no assurance can be given that a Fund will not be subject to the excise tax. Moreover, each Fund reserves the right to pay an excise tax rather than make an additional distribution when circumstances warrant (for example, if the amount of excise tax to be paid is deemed de minimis by a Fund).

Capital Loss Carryforwards

Subject to certain limitations, a Fund is permitted to carry forward a net capital loss from any year to offset its capital gains, if any, realized during the eight years following the year of the loss. A Fund’s capital loss carryforward is treated as a short-term capital loss in the year to which it is carried. If future capital gains are offset by carried forward capital losses, such future capital gains are not subject to fund-level U.S. federal income taxation, regardless of whether they are distributed to shareholders. Accordingly, the Funds do not expect to distribute any such offsetting capital gains. The Funds cannot carry back or carry forward any net operating losses.

Equalization Accounting

Each Fund may use the so-called “equalization method” of accounting to allocate a portion of its “accumulated earnings and profits,” which generally equals a Fund’s undistributed net investment income and realized capital gains, with certain adjustments, to redemption proceeds. This method permits a Fund to achieve more balanced distributions for both continuing and redeeming shareholders. Although using this method generally will not affect a Fund’s total returns, it may reduce the amount of income and gains that the Fund would otherwise distribute to continuing shareholders by reducing the effect of redemptions of Fund shares on Fund distributions to shareholders. The IRS has not sanctioned the particular equalization method used by the Funds, and thus a Fund’s use of this method may be subject to IRS scrutiny.

Taxation of Fund Investments

In general, realized gains or losses on the sale of securities held by a Fund will be treated as capital gains or losses, and long-term capital gains or losses if the Fund has held or is deemed to have held the securities for more than one year at the time of disposition.

If a Fund purchases a debt obligation with original issue discount (OID) (generally a debt obligation with an issue purchase price less than its stated principal amount, such as a zero-coupon bond), the Fund may be required to annually include in its income a portion of the OID as ordinary income, even though the Fund will not receive cash payments for such discount until maturity or disposition of the obligation. Inflation-protected bonds generally can be expected to produce OID income as their principal amounts are adjusted upward for inflation. In general, gains recognized on the disposition of (or the receipt of any partial payment of principal on) a debt obligation (including a municipal obligation) purchased by a Fund at a market discount, generally at a price less than its principal amount, will be treated as ordinary income to the extent of the portion of market discount which accrued, but was not previously recognized pursuant to an available election, during the term that the Fund held the debt obligation. A Fund generally will be required to make distributions to shareholders representing the OID or market discount (if an election is made by the Fund to accrue market discount over the holding period of the applicable debt obligation) on debt securities that is currently includible in income, even though the cash representing such income may not have been received by the Fund. Cash to pay such distributions may be obtained from borrowing or from sales proceeds of securities held by a Fund which the Fund otherwise might have continued to hold; obtaining such cash might be disadvantageous for the Fund.

In addition, payment-in-kind securities similarly will give rise to income which is required to be distributed and is taxable even though a Fund receives no cash interest payment on the security during the year. A portion of the interest paid or accrued on certain high-yield discount obligations (such as high-yield corporate debt securities) may not (and interest paid on debt obligations owned by a Fund that are considered for tax purposes to be payable in the equity of the issuer or a related party will not) be deductible to the issuer, possibly affecting the cash flow of the issuer.

If a Fund invests in debt obligations that are in the lowest rating categories or are unrated, including debt obligations of issuers not currently paying interest or who are in default, special tax issues may exist for the Fund. Tax rules are not entirely clear about issues, such as whether a Fund should recognize market discount on a debt obligation and, if so, the amount of market discount the Fund should recognize, when a Fund may cease to accrue interest, OID or market discount, when and to what extent deductions may be taken for bad debts or worthless securities and how payments received on obligations in default should be allocated between principal and income. These and other related issues will be addressed by a Fund when, as and if it invests in such securities, in order to seek to ensure that it distributes sufficient income to preserve its status as a regulated investment company and does not become subject to U.S. federal income or excise tax.

If an option granted by a Fund is sold, lapses or is otherwise terminated through a closing transaction, such as a repurchase by the Fund of the option from its holder, the Fund generally will realize a short-term capital gain or loss, depending on whether the premium income is greater or less than the amount paid by the Fund in the closing transaction. Some capital losses realized by a Fund in the sale, exchange, exercise or other disposition of an option may be deferred if they result from a position that is part of a “straddle,” discussed below. If securities are sold by a Fund pursuant to the exercise of a covered call option granted by it, the Fund generally will add the premium received to the sale price of the securities delivered in determining the amount of gain or loss on the sale. If securities are purchased by a Fund pursuant to the exercise of a put option written by it, the Fund generally will subtract the premium received from its cost basis in the securities purchased.

Some regulated futures contracts, foreign currency contracts, and non-equity, listed options that may be used by a Fund will be deemed “Section 1256 contracts.” A Fund will be required to “mark to market” any such contracts held at the end of the taxable year by treating them as if they had been sold on the last day of that year at market value. Sixty percent of any net gain or loss realized on all dispositions of Section 1256 contracts, including deemed

dispositions under the “mark-to-market” rule, generally will be treated as long-term capital gain or loss, and the remaining 40% will be treated as short-term capital gain or loss, although certain foreign currency gains and losses from such contracts may be treated as ordinary income or loss as described below. These provisions may require a Fund to recognize income or gains without a concurrent receipt of cash. Transactions that qualify as designated hedges are exempt from the mark-to-market rule and the “60%/40%” rule and may require the Fund to defer the recognition of losses on certain futures contracts, foreign currency contracts, and non-equity options.

Foreign exchange gains and losses realized by a Fund in connection with certain transactions involving foreign currency-denominated debt securities, certain options, futures contracts, forward contracts and similar instruments relating to foreign currency, foreign currencies, or payables or receivables denominated in a foreign currency are subject to Section 988 of the Code, which generally causes such gains and losses to be treated as ordinary income or loss and may affect the amount and timing of recognition of the Fund’s income. Under future U.S. Treasury Regulations, any such transactions that are not directly related to a Fund’s investments in stock or securities (or its options contracts or futures contracts with respect to stock or securities) may have to be limited in order to enable the Fund to satisfy the 90% qualifying income test described above. If the net foreign exchange loss exceeds a Fund’s net investment company taxable income (computed without regard to such loss) for a taxable year, the resulting ordinary loss for such year will not be available as a carryforward and thus cannot be deducted by the Fund or its shareholders in future years.

Offsetting positions held by a Fund involving certain derivative instruments, such as forwards, futures and options contracts, may be considered, for U.S. federal income tax purposes, to constitute “straddles.” “Straddles” are defined to include “offsetting positions” in actively traded personal property. The tax treatment of “straddles” is governed by Section 1092 of the Code which, in certain circumstances, overrides or modifies the provisions of Section 1256. If a Fund is treated as entering into a “straddle” and at least one (but not all) of the Fund’s positions in derivative contracts comprising a part of such straddle is governed by Section 1256 of the Code, described above, then such straddle could be characterized as a “mixed straddle.” A Fund may make one or more elections with respect to “mixed straddles.” Depending upon which election is made, if any, the results with respect to a Fund may differ. Generally, to the extent the straddle rules apply to positions established by a Fund, losses realized by the Fund may be deferred to the extent of unrealized gain in any offsetting positions. Moreover, as a result of the straddle rules, short-term capital loss on straddle positions may be recharacterized as long-term capital loss, and long-term capital gain may be characterized as short-term capital gain. In addition, the existence of a straddle may affect the holding period of the offsetting positions. As a result, the straddle rules could cause distributions that would otherwise constitute “qualified dividend income” or qualify for the dividends-received deduction to fail to satisfy the applicable holding period requirements (as described below). Furthermore, the Fund may be required to capitalize, rather than deduct currently, any interest expense and carrying charges applicable to a position that is part of a straddle, including any interest on indebtedness incurred or continued to purchase or carry any positions that are part of a straddle. The application of the straddle rules to certain offsetting Fund positions can therefore affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to shareholders, and may result in significant differences from the amount, timing and character of distributions that would have been made by the Fund if it had not entered into offsetting positions in respect of certain of its portfolio securities.

If a Fund enters into a “constructive sale” of any appreciated financial position in stock, a partnership interest, or certain debt instruments, the Fund will be treated as if it had sold and immediately repurchased the property and must recognize gain (but not loss) with respect to that position. A constructive sale of an appreciated financial position occurs when a Fund enters into certain offsetting transactions with respect to the same or substantially identical property, including, but not limited to: (i) a short sale; (ii) an offsetting notional principal contract; (iii) a futures or forward contract; or (iv) other transactions identified in future U.S. Treasury Regulations. The character of the gain from constructive sales will depend upon a Fund’s holding period in the appreciated financial position. Losses realized from a sale of a position that was previously the subject of a constructive sale will be recognized when the position is subsequently disposed of. The character of such losses will depend upon a Fund’s holding period in the position beginning with the date the constructive sale was

deemed to have occurred and the application of various loss deferral provisions in the Code. Constructive sale treatment does not apply to certain closed transactions, including if such a transaction is closed on or before the 30th day after the close of the Fund’s taxable year and the Fund holds the appreciated financial position unhedged throughout the 60-day period beginning with the day such transaction was closed.

The amount of long-term capital gain a Fund may recognize from certain derivative transactions with respect to interests in certain pass-through entities is limited under the Code’s constructive ownership rules. The amount of long-term capital gain is limited to the amount of such gain the Fund would have had if the Fund directly invested in the pass-through entity during the term of the derivative contract. Any gain in excess of this amount is treated as ordinary income. An interest charge is imposed on the amount of gain that is treated as ordinary income.

If the Fund makes a distribution of income received by the Fund in lieu of dividends (a “substitute payment”) with respect to securities on loan pursuant to a securities lending transaction, that income will not constitute qualified dividend income to individual shareholders and will not be eligible for the dividends-received deduction for corporate shareholders. Similar consequences may apply to repurchase and other derivative transactions. Similarly, to the extent that a Fund makes distributions of income received by the Fund in lieu of tax-exempt interest with respect to securities on loan, such distributions will not constitute exempt-interest dividends (defined below) to shareholders.

In addition, a Fund’s transactions in securities and certain types of derivatives (e.g., options, futures contracts, forward contracts and swap agreements) may be subject to other special tax rules, such as the wash-sale rules or the short-sale rules, the effect of which may be to accelerate income to the Fund, defer losses to the Fund, cause adjustments in the holding periods of the Fund’s securities, convert long-term capital gains into short-term capital gains, and/or convert short-term capital losses into long-term capital losses. These rules could therefore affect the amount, timing and character of distributions to shareholders.

Certain of a Fund’s hedging activities (including its transactions, if any, in foreign currencies or foreign currency-denominated instruments) are likely to produce a difference between its book income and its taxable income. If a Fund’s book income exceeds the sum of its taxable income and net tax-exempt income (if any), the distribution (if any) of such excess generally will be treated as (i) a dividend to the extent of the Fund’s remaining earnings and profits (including earnings and profits arising from tax exempt income), (ii) thereafter, as a return of capital to the extent of the recipient’s basis in its shares, and (iii) thereafter, as gain from the sale or exchange of a capital asset. If a Fund’s book income is less than the sum of its taxable income, and net tax-exempt income, (if any), the Fund could be required to make distributions exceeding book income to qualify as a regulated investment company.

Rules governing U.S. federal income tax aspects of derivatives, including swap agreements, are in a developing stage and are not entirely clear in certain respects. Accordingly, while each Fund intends to account for such transactions in a manner it deems to be appropriate, an adverse determination or future guidance by the IRS with respect to these rules (which determination or guidance could be retroactive) may affect whether a Fund has made sufficient distributions, and otherwise satisfied the relevant requirements to maintain its qualification as a regulated investment company and avoid fund-level tax. Certain requirements that must be met under the Code in order for a Fund to qualify as a regulated investment company may limit the extent to which a Fund will be able to engage in certain derivatives transactions.

A Fund may invest directly or indirectly in residual interests in REMICs or equity interests in taxable mortgage pools (TMPs). Under an IRS notice, and U.S. Treasury Regulations that have yet to be issued but may apply retroactively, a portion of a Fund’s income (including income allocated to the Fund from a pass-through entity) that is attributable to a residual interest in a REMIC or an equity interest in a TMP (referred to in the Code as an “excess inclusion”) will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in all events. This notice also provides, and the regulations are expected to provide, that excess inclusion income of a regulated investment company, such as a Fund, will be allocated to shareholders of the regulated investment company in proportion to the dividends

received by such shareholders, with the same consequences as if the shareholders held the related interest directly. As a result, the Fund may not be a suitable investment for certain tax-exempt shareholders, as noted under Tax-Exempt Shareholders below.

In general, excess inclusion income allocated to shareholders (i) cannot be offset by net operating losses (subject to a limited exception for certain thrift institutions), (ii) will constitute unrelated business taxable income (UBTI) to entities (including a qualified pension plan, an individual retirement account, a 401(k) plan, a Keogh plan or certain other tax-exempt entities) subject to tax on UBTI, thereby potentially requiring such an entity that is allocated excess inclusion income, and otherwise might not be required to file a tax return, to file a tax return and pay tax on such income, and (iii) in the case of a foreign shareholder, will not qualify for any reduction in U.S. federal withholding tax.

“Passive foreign investment companies” (PFICs) are generally defined as foreign corporations where at least 75% of their gross income for their taxable year is income from passive sources (such as interest, dividends, certain rents and royalties, or capital gains) or at least 50% of their assets on average produce such passive income or are held to produce such passive income. If a Fund acquires any equity interest in a PFIC, the Fund could be subject to U.S. federal income tax and interest charges on “excess distributions” received from the PFIC or on gain from the sale of such equity interest in the PFIC, even if all income or gain actually received by the Fund is timely distributed to its shareholders. Excess distributions and gain from the sale of interests in PFICs may be characterized as ordinary income even though, absent the application of PFIC rules, these amounts may otherwise have been classified as capital gain.

A Fund will not be permitted to pass through to its shareholders any credit or deduction for these special taxes and interest charges incurred with respect to a PFIC. Elections may be available that would ameliorate these adverse tax consequences, but such elections would require a Fund to include its share of the PFIC’s income and net capital gains annually, regardless of whether it receives any distribution from the PFIC (in the case of a “QEF election”), or to mark the gains (and to a limited extent losses) in its interests in the PFIC “to the market” as though the Fund had sold and repurchased such interests on the last day of the Fund’s taxable year, treating such gains and losses as ordinary income and loss (in the case of a “mark-to-market election”). The QEF and mark-to-market elections may require a Fund to recognize taxable income or gain without the concurrent receipt of cash and increase the amount required to be distributed by the Fund to avoid taxation. Making either of these elections therefore may require a Fund to liquidate other investments prematurely to meet the minimum distribution requirements described above, which also may accelerate the recognition of gain and adversely affect the Fund’s total return. Each Fund may attempt to limit and/or manage its holdings in PFICs to minimize tax liability and/or maximize returns from these investments but there can be no assurance that it will be able to do so. Moreover, because it is not always possible to identify a foreign corporation as a PFIC in advance of acquiring shares in the corporation, a Fund may incur the tax and interest charges described above in some instances. Dividends paid by PFICs will not be eligible to be treated as qualified dividend income, as defined below.

In addition to the investments described above, prospective shareholders should be aware that other investments made by a Fund may involve complex tax rules that may result in income or gain recognition by the Fund without corresponding current cash receipts. Although each Fund seeks to avoid significant noncash income, such noncash income could be recognized by a Fund, in which case the Fund may distribute cash derived from other sources in order to meet the minimum distribution requirements described above. In this regard, a Fund could be required at times to liquidate investments prematurely in order to satisfy its minimum distribution requirements, which may accelerate the recognition of gain and adversely affect the Fund’s total return.

Taxation of Distributions

Except for exempt-interest dividends (defined below) paid by a Fund, distributions paid out of a Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, whether paid in cash or reinvested in the Fund, generally are

deemed to be taxable distributions and must be reported by each shareholder who is required to file a U.S. federal income tax return. Dividends and distributions on a Fund’s shares are generally subject to U.S. federal income tax as described herein to the extent they do not exceed the Fund’s realized income and gains, even though such dividends and distributions may economically represent a return of a particular shareholder’s investment. Such distributions are likely to occur in respect of shares purchased at a time when the Fund’s net asset value (NAV) reflects either unrealized gains or realized but undistributed income or gains. Such realized income and gains may be required to be distributed even when the Fund’s NAV also reflects unrealized losses. For U.S. federal income tax purposes, a Fund’s earnings and profits, described above, are determined at the end of the Fund’s taxable year and are allocated pro rata to distributions paid over the entire year. Distributions in excess of a Fund’s current and accumulated earnings and profits will first be treated as a return of capital up to the amount of a shareholder’s tax basis in his or her Fund shares and then as capital gain. A return of capital is not taxable, but it reduces a shareholder’s tax basis in his or her Fund shares, thus reducing any loss or increasing any gain on a subsequent taxable disposition by the shareholder of his or her shares. A Fund may make distributions in excess of its earnings and profits to a limited extent, from time to time.

For U.S. federal income tax purposes, distributions of investment income (except for exempt-interest dividends and qualified dividend income, each defined below) are generally taxable as ordinary income, and distributions of gains from the sale of investments that a Fund owned (or is deemed to have owned) for one year or less will be taxable as ordinary income. Distributions properly designated by a Fund as capital gain dividends (Capital Gains Dividends) will be taxable to shareholders as long-term capital gain (to the extent such distributions do not exceed the Fund’s actual net long-term capital gain for the taxable year), regardless of how long a shareholder has held Fund shares, and do not qualify as dividends for purposes of the dividends-received deduction or as qualified dividend income (defined below). Each Fund will designate Capital Gain Dividends, if any, in a written notice mailed by the Fund to its shareholders not later than 60 days after the close of the Fund’s taxable year.

Some states will not tax distributions made to individual shareholders that are attributable to interest a Fund earns on direct obligations of the U.S. Government if the Fund meets the state’s minimum investment or reporting requirements, if any. Investments in GNMA or FNMA securities, bankers’ acceptances, commercial paper, and repurchase agreements collateralized by U.S. Government securities generally do not qualify for tax- free treatment. This exemption may not apply to corporate shareholders.

Sales and Exchanges of Fund Shares

If a shareholder sells or exchanges his or her Fund shares, he or she generally will realize a taxable capital gain or loss on the difference between the amount received for the shares (or deemed received in the case of an exchange) and his or her tax basis in the shares. This gain or loss will be long-term capital gain or loss if he or she has held (or is deemed to have owned) such Fund shares for more than one year at the time of the sale or exchange, and short-term capital gain or loss otherwise.

If a shareholder sells or exchanges Fund shares within 90 days of having acquired such shares and if, as a result of having initially acquired those shares, he or she subsequently pays a reduced sales charge on a new purchase of shares of the Fund or a different regulated investment company, the sales charge previously incurred in acquiring the Fund’s shares generally shall not be taken into account (to the extent the previous sales charges do not exceed the reduction in sales charges on the new purchase) for the purpose of determining the amount of gain or loss on the disposition, but generally will be treated as having been incurred in the new purchase. Also, if a shareholder realizes a loss on a disposition of Fund shares, the loss will be disallowed under “wash sale” rules to the extent that he or she purchases substantially identical shares within the 61-day period beginning 30 days before and ending 30 days after the disposition. Any disallowed loss generally will be reflected in an adjustment to the tax basis of the purchased shares.

If a shareholder receives a Capital Gain Dividend or is deemed to receive a distribution of long-term capital gain with respect to any Fund share and such Fund share is held or treated as held for six months or less, then

(unless otherwise disallowed) any loss on the sale or exchange of that Fund share will be treated as a long-term capital loss to the extent of the Capital Gain Dividend or distribution of long-term capital gain. If shares of a Fund are sold at a loss after being held for six months or less, the loss will be disallowed to the extent of any exempt-interest dividends (defined below) received on those shares.

Foreign Taxes

Amounts realized by a Fund from sources within foreign countries may be subject to withholding and other taxes imposed by such countries. Tax conventions between certain countries and the United States may reduce or eliminate such taxes. If more than 50% of the value of a Fund’s total assets at the close of its taxable year consists of securities of foreign corporations, the Fund will be eligible to file an annual election with the IRS pursuant to which the Fund may pass-through to its shareholders on a pro rata basis foreign income and similar taxes paid by the Fund with respect to foreign securities that the Fund has held for at least the minimum holding periods specified in the Code and such taxes may be claimed, subject to certain limitations, either as a tax credit or deduction by the shareholders.

U.S. Federal Income Tax Rates

As of the date of this SAI, the maximum stated U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to individuals generally is 35% for ordinary income and 15% for net long-term capital gain.

Current U.S. federal income tax law also provides for a maximum individual U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to “qualified dividend income” equal to the highest net long-term capital gain rate, which generally is 15%. In general, “qualified dividend income” is income attributable to dividends received by a Fund in taxable years beginning on or before December 31, 2012 from certain domestic and foreign corporations, as long as certain holding period and other requirements are met by the Fund with respect to the dividend-paying corporation’s stock and by the shareholders with respect to the Fund’s shares. If 95% or more of a Fund’s gross income (excluding net long-term capital gain over net short-term capital loss) constitutes qualified dividend income, all of its distributions (other than Capital Gain Dividends) will be generally treated as qualified dividend income in the hands of individual shareholders, as long as they have owned their Fund shares for at least 61 days during the 121-day period beginning 60 days before the Fund’s ex-dividend date (or, in the case of certain preferred stock, 91 days during the 181-day period beginning 90 days before such date) and meet certain other requirements specified in the Code. In general, if less than 95% of a Fund’s income is attributable to qualified dividend income, then only the portion of the Fund’s distributions that is attributable to qualified dividend income and designated as such in a timely manner will be so treated in the hands of individual shareholders who meet the aforementioned requirements. The rules regarding the qualification of Fund distributions as qualified dividend income are complex, including the holding period requirements. Individual Fund shareholders therefore are urged to consult their own tax advisors and financial planners.

The maximum stated corporate U.S. federal income tax rate applicable to ordinary income and net capital gain is 35%. Actual marginal tax rates may be higher for some shareholders, for example, through reductions in deductions. Naturally, the amount of tax payable by any taxpayer will be affected by a combination of tax laws covering, for example, deductions, credits, deferrals, exemptions, sources of income and other matters. U.S. federal income tax rates are set to increase in future years under various “sunset” provisions of U.S. federal income tax laws. In particular, for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012, the maximum capital gain rate applicable to long-term capital gains of individuals is scheduled to increase to 20% and the favorable treatment of qualified dividend income is scheduled to expire.

Backup Withholding

Each Fund generally is required to withhold, and remit to the U.S. Treasury, subject to certain exemptions, an amount equal to 28% of all distributions and redemption proceeds (including proceeds from exchanges and redemptions in-kind) paid or credited to a Fund shareholder if (1) the shareholder fails to furnish the Fund with a correct “taxpayer identification number” (TIN) or has not certified to the Fund that withholding does not apply or

(2) the IRS notifies the Fund that the shareholder’s TIN is incorrect or the shareholder is otherwise subject to backup withholding. These backup withholding rules may also apply to distributions that are properly designated as exempt-interest dividends. This backup withholding is not an additional tax imposed on the shareholder. The shareholder may apply amounts required to be withheld as a credit against his or her future U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS. If a shareholder fails to furnish a valid TIN upon request, the shareholder can also be subject to IRS penalties. The rate of backup withholding is set to increase for amounts distributed or paid after December 31, 2012.

Tax-Deferred Plans

The shares of a Fund may be available for a variety of tax-deferred retirement and other tax-advantaged plans and accounts. Prospective investors should contact their tax advisors and financial planners regarding the tax consequences to them of holding Fund shares through such plans and/or accounts.

Corporate Shareholders

Subject to limitations and other rules, a corporate shareholder of a Fund may be eligible for the dividends-received deduction on Fund distributions attributable to dividends received by the Fund from domestic corporations, which, if received directly by the corporate shareholder would qualify for such a deduction. For eligible corporate shareholders, the dividends-received deduction may be subject to certain reductions, and a distribution by a Fund attributable to dividends of a domestic corporation will be eligible for the deduction only if certain holding period and other requirements are met. These requirements are complex; therefore, corporate shareholders of the Funds are urged to consult their own tax advisors and financial planners.

As discussed above, a portion of the interest paid or accrued on certain high-yield discount obligations that a Fund may own may not be deductible to the issuer. If a portion of the interest paid or accrued on these obligations is not deductible, that portion will be treated as a dividend. In such cases, if the issuer of the obligation is a domestic corporation, dividend payments by a Fund may be eligible for the dividends-received deduction to the extent of the dividend portion of such interest.

Foreign Shareholders

For purposes of this discussion, “foreign shareholders” generally include: (i) nonresident alien individuals, (ii) foreign trusts (i.e., a trust other than a trust with respect to which a U.S. court is able to exercise primary supervision over administration of that trust and one or more U.S. persons have authority to control substantial decisions of that trust), (iii) foreign estates (i.e., the income of which is not subject to U.S. tax regardless of source) and (iv) foreign corporations.

Generally, unless an exception applies, distributions made to foreign shareholders other than Capital Gain Dividends and exempt-interest dividends will be subject to non-refundable U.S. federal income tax withholding at a 30% rate (or such lower rate as may be provided under an applicable income tax treaty) even if they are funded by income or gains (such as portfolio interest, short-term capital gains, or foreign-source dividend and interest income) that, if paid to a foreign person directly, would not be subject to withholding. However, generally, for taxable years beginning before January 1, 2012, distributions made to foreign shareholders and properly designated by a Fund as “interest-related dividends” are exempt from U.S. federal income tax withholding. The exemption for interest-related dividends does not apply to any distribution to a foreign shareholder (i) to the extent that the dividend is attributable to certain interest on an obligation if the foreign shareholder is the issuer or is a 10% shareholder of the issuer, (ii) that is within certain foreign countries that have inadequate information exchange with the United States or (iii) to the extent the dividend is attributable to interest paid by a person that is a related person of the foreign shareholder and the foreign shareholder is a controlled foreign corporation. Interest-related dividends are generally attributable to the Fund’s net U.S.-source interest income of types similar to those not subject to U.S. federal income tax if earned directly by an individual

foreign shareholder. In order to qualify as an interest-related dividend, the Fund must designate a distribution as such in a written notice mailed to its shareholders not later than 60 days after the close of the Fund’s taxable year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if a distribution described above is “effectively connected” with a U.S. trade or business (or, if an income tax treaty applies, is attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment) of the recipient foreign shareholder, neither U.S. federal income tax withholding nor the exemption for interest-related dividends will apply. Instead, the distribution will be subject to the tax, reporting and withholding requirements generally applicable to U.S. persons, and an additional branch profits tax may apply if the recipient foreign shareholder is a foreign corporation.

In general, a foreign shareholder’s capital gains realized on the disposition of Fund shares, distributions properly designated as Capital Gain Dividends and, with respect to taxable years of a Fund beginning before January 1, 2012, “short-term capital gain dividends” (defined below) are not subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax unless: (i) such gains or distributions are effectively connected with a U.S. trade or business (or, if an income tax treaty applies, are attributable to a U.S. permanent establishment) of the foreign shareholder; or (ii) in the case of an individual foreign shareholder, the shareholder is present in the U.S. for a period or periods aggregating 183 days or more during the year of the disposition of Fund shares or the receipt of Capital Gain Dividends or short-term capital gain dividends and certain other conditions are met. If the requirements of clause (i) are met, the tax, reporting and withholding requirements applicable to U.S. persons generally will apply to the foreign shareholder, and an additional branch profits tax may apply if the foreign shareholder is a foreign corporation. If the requirements of clause (i) are not met, but the requirements of clause (ii) are met, such gains and distributions will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a 30% rate (or such lower rate provided under an applicable income tax treaty). “Short-term capital gain dividends” are distributions attributable to a Fund’s net short-term capital gain in excess of its net long-term capital loss and designated as such by the Fund in a written notice mailed by the Fund to its shareholders not later than 60 days after the close of the Fund’s taxable year.

It is currently not known whether Congress will extend the exemptions from withholding for interest-related dividends and short-term capital gain for tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2012.

In the case of shares held through an intermediary, even if a Fund makes a designation with respect to a payment, no assurance can be made that the intermediary will respect such a designation, and an intermediary may withhold even if a Fund makes a designation with respect to a payment. Foreign shareholders should contact their intermediaries regarding the application of these rules to their accounts.

Even if permitted to do so, each Fund provides no assurance that it will designate any distributions as interest-related dividends or short-term capital gain dividends.

Special rules apply to certain distributions to certain foreign shareholders from a regulated investment company that is either a “U.S. real property holding corporation” (USRPHC) or would be a USRPHC absent exclusions from the definition thereof for interests in domestically controlled REITs or regulated investment companies and not-greater-than-5% interests in publicly traded classes of stock in REITs or regulated investment companies. Additionally, special rules apply to the sale of shares in a regulated investment company that is a USRPHC. Generally, a USRPHC is a domestic corporation that holds U.S. real property interests (USRPIs) — USRPIs are defined very generally as any interest in U.S. real property or any equity interest in a USRPHC — the fair market value of which equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market values of the corporation’s USRPIs, interests in real property located outside the United States and other assets. The Funds generally do not expect that they will be USRPHCs or would be USRPHCs but for the above-mentioned exceptions and thus do not expect that these special tax rules will apply.

In order to qualify for any exemptions from withholding described above or for lower withholding tax rates under income tax treaties, or to establish an exemption from backup withholding, a foreign shareholder must comply with applicable certification requirements relating to its foreign status (including, in general, furnishing an IRS Form W-8BEN or substitute form). Foreign shareholders should consult their tax advisers in this regard.

Special rules (including withholding and reporting requirements) apply to foreign partnerships and those holding Fund shares through foreign partnerships. In addition, additional considerations may apply to foreign trusts and foreign estates. Investors holding Fund shares through foreign entities should consult their tax advisors about their particular situation.

A beneficial holder of shares who is a foreign person may be subject to state and local tax and to the U.S. federal estate tax in addition to the U.S. federal income tax referred to above.

Tax-Exempt Shareholders

Under current law, a Fund generally serves to “block” (that is, prevent the attribution to shareholders of) UBTI from being realized by tax-exempt shareholders. Notwithstanding this “blocking” effect, a tax-exempt shareholder could realize UBTI by virtue of its investment in a Fund if shares in the Fund constitute debt-financed property in the hands of the tax-exempt shareholder within the meaning of Code Section 514(b).

It is possible that a tax-exempt shareholder will also recognize UBTI if a Fund recognizes excess inclusion income (as described above) derived from direct or indirect investments in residual interests in REMICs or equity interests in TMPs. Furthermore, any investment in residual interests of a CMO that has elected to be treated as a REMIC can create complex tax consequences, especially if the Fund has state or local governments or other tax-exempt organizations as shareholders.

In addition, special tax consequences apply to charitable remainder trusts (CRTs) that invest in regulated investment companies that invest directly or indirectly in residual interests in REMICs or equity interests in TMPs. Under legislation enacted in December 2006, a CRT, as defined in Section 664 of the Code, that realizes UBTI for a taxable year must pay an excise tax annually of an amount equal to such UBTI. Under IRS guidance issued in October 2006, a CRT will not recognize UBTI solely as a result of investing in a Fund to the extent that it recognizes excess inclusion income. Rather, if at any time during any taxable year a CRT (or one of certain other tax-exempt shareholders, such as the United States, a state or political subdivision, or an agency or instrumentality thereof, and certain energy cooperatives) is a record holder of a share in a Fund and the Fund recognizes excess inclusion income, then the Fund will be subject to a tax on that portion of its excess inclusion income for the taxable year that is allocable to such shareholders at the highest U.S. federal corporate income tax rate. The extent to which the IRS guidance remains applicable in light of the December 2006 legislation is unclear. To the extent permitted under the 1940 Act, each Fund may elect to specially allocate any such tax to the applicable CRT, or other shareholder, and thus reduce such shareholder’s distributions for the year by the amount of the tax that relates to such shareholder’s interest in the Fund. Each Fund has not yet determined whether such an election will be made. CRTs are urged to consult their tax advisors concerning the consequences of investing in a Fund.

Tax Shelter Reporting Regulations

Under Treasury Regulations, if a shareholder recognizes a loss of $2 million or more for an individual shareholder or $10 million or more for a corporate shareholder, the shareholder must file with the IRS a disclosure statement on Form 8886. Direct shareholders of portfolio securities are in many cases excepted from this reporting requirement, but under current guidance, shareholders of a regulated investment company are not excepted. Future guidance may extend the current exception from this reporting requirement to shareholders of most or all regulated investment companies. The fact that a loss is reportable under these regulations does not affect the legal determination of whether the taxpayer’s treatment of the loss is proper. Shareholders should consult their tax advisors to determine the applicability of these regulations in light of their individual circumstances.

CONTROL PERSONS AND PRINCIPAL SHAREHOLDERS

The following table shows, as of August 19, 2011 the name, address and percentage ownership of each person who may be deemed (1) a “principal holder” of Columbia Acorn European Fund and/or Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund, respectively, by virtue of owning beneficially 5% or more of any class of such Fund’s outstanding shares and/or (2) a “control person” of Columbia Acorn European Fund and/or Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund, respectively, by virtue of owning greater than 25% of such Fund’s outstanding shares, either beneficially or by virtue of fiduciary or trust roles or otherwise.

Principal Holder Ownership


Fund/Share Class	Shareholder Account Registration	Share Balance		Approximate Percentage of Fund Shares
Columbia Acorn European Fund — Class A	Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ATTN: Tim Armbrustmacher 5087 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474		500		100	%
Columbia Acorn European Fund — Class C	Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ATTN: Tim Armbrustmacher 5087 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474		500		100	%
Columbia Acorn European Fund — Class I	Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ATTN: Tim Armbrustmacher 5087 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474		500		100	%
Columbia Acorn European Fund — Class Z	P. Zachary Egan Trustee P. Zachary Egan Revocable Trust c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		30,000		23.2	%
Columbia Acorn European Fund — Class Z	Charles P. McQuaid Trustee Charles P. McQuaid Trust c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		25,000		19.3	%
Columbia Acorn European Fund — Class Z	Louis J. Mendes III c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		10,000		7.7	%
Columbia Acorn European Fund — Class Z	Frederick G. Kaegi c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		10,000		7.7	%
Columbia Acorn European Fund — Class Z	David L. Frank and Tamara L. Sokolee, JTWROS c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		10,000		7.7	%

100


Fund/Share Class	Shareholder Account Registration	Share Balance		Approximate Percentage of Fund Shares
Columbia Acorn European Fund — Class Z	Stephen Kusmierczak c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		25,000		19.3	%
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund — Class A	Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ATTN: Tim Armbrustmacher 5087 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474		500		100	%
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund — Class C	Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ATTN: Tim Armbrustmacher 5087 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474		500		100	%
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund — Class I	Columbia Management Investment Advisers, LLC ATTN: Tim Armbrustmacher 5087 Ameriprise Financial Center Minneapolis, MN 55474		500		100	%
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund — Class Z	P. Zachary Egan Trustee P. Zachary Egan Revocable Trust c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		15,000		7.0	%
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund — Class Z	Charles P. McQuaid Trustee Charles P. McQuaid Trust c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		50,000		23.4	%
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund — Class Z	Louis J. Mendes III c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		25,000		11.7	%
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund — Class Z	Frederick G. Kaegi c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		50,000		23.4	%
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund — Class Z	Stephen Kusmierczak c/o CWAM 227 W. Monroe Street Suite 3000 Chicago, IL 60606		25,000		11.7	%

Control Person Ownership


Fund	Shareholder Account Registration	Fund Balance	Percentage of Fund
Columbia Acorn European Fund	NONE	N/A	N/A
Columbia Acorn Emerging Markets Fund	NONE	N/A	N/A

101

APPENDIX A — DESCRIPTIONS OF SECURITIES RATINGS

This Appendix summarizes the various descriptions of securities ratings applicable to securities purchased by the Columbia Funds Family. Please refer to a Fund’s prospectus and this statement of additional information to determine whether the Fund may invest in securities that have ratings described in this Appendix.

STANDARD & POOR’S (S&P)

Bonds

The following summarizes the ratings used by S&P for bonds. The ratings AAA, AA, A and BBB denote investment grade securities.

AAA bonds have the highest rating assigned by S&P and are considered to have an extremely strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal.

AA bonds are considered to have a very strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal, and they differ from AAA only in small degree.

A bonds are considered to have a strong capacity to pay interest and repay principal, although they are somewhat more susceptible to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions than debt in higher rated categories.

BBB bonds are considered to have an adequate capacity to pay interest and repay principal. Whereas they normally exhibit adequate protection parameters, adverse economic conditions or changing circumstances are more likely to lead to a weakened capacity to pay interest and repay principal than for bonds in the A category.

BB, B, CCC, CC and C bonds are considered to have predominantly speculative characteristics with respect to capacity to pay interest and repay principal in accordance with the terms of the obligation. BB indicates the lowest degree of speculation and C the highest degree. While such debt will likely have some quality and protective characteristics, these are outweighed by large uncertainties or large exposures to adverse conditions.

BB bonds are considered to have less near-term vulnerability to default than other speculative issues. However, they face major ongoing uncertainties or exposure to adverse business, financial, or economic conditions which could lead to inadequate capacity to meet timely interest and principal payments. The BB rating category is also used for debt subordinated to senior debt that is assigned an actual or implied BBB — rating.

B bonds are considered to have a greater vulnerability to default but currently have the capacity to meet interest payments and principal repayments. Adverse business, financial, or economic conditions will likely impair capacity or willingness to pay interest and repay principal. The B rating category is also used for debt subordinated to senior debt that is assigned an actual or implied BB or BB — rating.

CCC bonds are considered to have a currently identifiable vulnerability to default, and are dependent upon favorable business, financial, and economic conditions to meet timely payment of interest and repayment of principal. In the event of adverse business, financial, or economic conditions, the bonds are not likely to have the capacity to pay interest and repay principal. The CCC rating category is also used for debt subordinated to senior debt that is assigned an actual or implied B or B — rating.

CC rating typically is applied to debt subordinated to senior debt that is assigned an actual or implied CCC rating.

C rating typically is applied to debt subordinated to senior debt that is assigned an actual or implied CCC — debt rating. The C rating may be used to cover a situation, for example, where a bankruptcy petition has been filed, but debt service payments are continued.

A-1

CI rating is reserved for income bonds on which no interest is being paid.

D bonds are in payment default. The D rating category is used when interest payments or principal payments are not made on the date due even if the applicable grace period has not expired, unless S&P believes that such payments will be made during such grace period. The D rating also will be used upon the filing of a bankruptcy petition if debt service payments are jeopardized.

Plus (+) or minus (-): The ratings from AA to CCC may be modified by the addition of a plus or minus sign to show relative standing within the major rating categories.

Municipal Notes

SP-1. Notes rated SP-1 are considered to have very strong or strong capacity to pay principal and interest. Those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are designated as SP-1+.

SP-2. Notes rated SP-2 are considered to have satisfactory capacity to pay principal and interest.

Notes due in three years or less normally receive a note rating. Notes maturing beyond three years normally receive a bond rating, although the following criteria are used in making that assessment:

Amortization schedule (the larger the final maturity relative to other maturities, the more likely the issue will be rated as a note).

Source of payment (the more dependent the issue is on the market for its refinancing, the more likely it will be rated as a note).

Commercial Paper

A. Issues assigned this highest rating are regarded as having the greatest capacity for timely payment. Issues in this category are further refined with the designations 1, 2, and 3 to indicate the relative degree of safety.

A-1. Issues assigned to this rating are considered to have overwhelming or very strong capacity for timely payment. Those issues determined to possess overwhelming safety characteristics are designed A-1+.

MOODY’S INVESTORS SERVICE, INC. (MOODY’S)

Municipal Bonds

Aaa bonds are considered to be of the best quality. They are considered to have the smallest degree of investment risk and are generally referred to as ‘‘gilt edge’’. Interest payments are protected by a large or by an exceptionally stable margin and principal is secure. While various protective elements are likely to change, such changes as can be visualized are most unlikely to impair a fundamentally strong position of such issues.

Aa bonds are considered to be of high quality by all standards. Together with Aaa bonds they comprise what are generally known as high-grade bonds. They are rated lower than the best bonds because margins of protection may not be as large in Aaa securities or fluctuation of protective elements may be of greater amplitude or there may be other elements present which make the long-term risks appear somewhat larger than in Aaa securities. Those bonds in the Aa through B groups that Moody’s believes possess the strongest investment attributes are designated by the symbols Aa1, A1 or Baa1.

A bonds are considered to possess many favorable investment attributes and are to be considered to be upper-medium-grade obligations. Factors giving security to principal and interest are considered adequate, but elements may be present that suggest a susceptibility to impairment at some time in the future.

A-2

Baa bonds are considered to be medium grade obligations: they are neither highly protected nor poorly secured. Interest payments and principal security appear adequate for the present but certain protective elements may be lacking or may be characteristically unreliable over any great period of time. Such bonds lack outstanding investment characteristics and, in fact, have speculative characteristics as well.

Ba bonds are considered to have speculative elements: their future cannot be considered as well secured. Often, the protection of interest and principal payments may be very moderate and thereby not well safeguarded during both good and bad times in the future. Uncertainty of position characterizes bonds in this grade.

B bonds are considered generally to lack characteristics of a desirable investment. Assurance of interest and principal payments or of maintenance of other terms of the contract over any long period of time may be small.

Caa bonds are considered to be of poor standing. Such issues may be in default or there may be present elements of danger with respect to principal or interest.

Ca bonds are considered to represent obligations that are speculative in a high degree. Such issues are often in default or have other marked shortcomings.

C bonds are the lowest rated class of bonds and issues so rated are considered to have extremely poor prospects of ever attaining any real investment standing.

Conditional Ratings. Bonds for which the security depends upon the completion of some act or the fulfillment of some condition are rated conditionally. These are bonds secured by (a) earnings of projects under construction, (b) earnings of projects unseasoned in operating experience, (c) rentals which begin when facilities are completed, or (d) payments to which some other limiting conditions attach. Parenthetical rating denotes probable credit stature upon completion of construction or elimination of basis of condition.

Corporate Bonds

The description of the applicable rating symbols (Aaa, Aa, A, Baa, etc.) and their meanings is identical to that of the Municipal Bond ratings as set forth above, except for the numerical modifiers. Moody’s applies numerical modifiers 1, 2, and 3 in the Aa and A classifications of its corporate bond rating system. The modifier 1 indicates that the security ranks in the higher end of its generic rating category; the modifier 2 indicates a midrange ranking; and the modifier 3 indicates that the issuer ranks in the lower end of its generic rating category.

Municipal Notes

MIG 1. This designation denotes best quality. There is present strong protection by established cash flows, superior liquidity support or demonstrated broad-based access to the market for refinancing.

MIG 2. This designation denotes high quality. Margins of protection are ample although not so large as in the preceding group.

MIG 3. This designation denotes favorable quality. All security elements are accounted for, but there is lacking the undeniable strength of the preceding grades. Liquidity and cash flow protection may be narrow and market access for refinancing is likely to be less well established.

A-3

Commercial Paper

Moody’s employs the following three designations, all judged to be investment grade, to indicate the relative repayment capacity of rated issuers:

Prime-1 Highest Quality

Prime-2 Higher Quality

Prime-3 High Quality

If an issuer represents to Moody’s that its commercial paper obligations are supported by the credit of another entity or entities, Moody’s, in assigning ratings to such issuers, evaluates the financial strength of the indicated affiliated corporations, commercial banks, insurance companies, foreign governments, or other entities, but only as one factor in the total rating assessment.

FITCH, INC. (FITCH)

Long-Term Debt

Investment Grade Bond Ratings

AAA bonds are considered to be investment grade and of the highest credit quality. The obligor has an exceptionally strong ability to pay interest and/or dividends and repay principal, which is unlikely to be affected by reasonably foreseeable events.

AA bonds are considered to be investment grade and of very high credit quality. The obligor’s ability to pay interest and repay principal is very strong, although not quite as strong as bonds rated AAA. Because bonds rated in the AAA and AA categories are not significantly vulnerable to foreseeable future developments, short-term debt of these issuers is generally rated F-1+.

A bonds are considered to be investment grade and of high credit quality. The obligor’s ability to pay interest and repay principal is considered to be strong, but may be more vulnerable to adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances than debt securities with higher ratings.

BBB bonds are considered to be investment grade and of satisfactory credit quality. The obligor’s ability to pay interest or dividends and repay principal is considered to be adequate. Adverse changes in economic conditions and circumstances, however, are more likely to have adverse impact on these securities and, therefore, impair timely payment. The likelihood that the ratings of these bonds will fall below investment grade is higher than for securities with higher ratings.

Speculative Grade Bond Ratings

BB bonds are considered speculative. The obligor’s ability to pay interest and repay principal may be affected over time by adverse economic changes. However, business and financial alternatives can be identified, which could assist the obligor in satisfying its debt service requirements.

B bonds are considered highly speculative. While securities in this class are currently meeting debt service requirements, the probability of continued timely payment of principal and interest reflects the obligor’s limited margin of safety and the need for reasonable business and economic activity throughout the life of the issue.

CCC bonds are considered to have certain identifiable characteristics that, if not remedied, may lead to default. The ability to meet obligations requires an advantageous business and economic environment.

A-4

CC bonds are considered to be minimally protected. Default in payment of interest and/or principal seems probable over time.

C bonds are in imminent default in payment of interest or principal.

DDD, DD, and D bonds are in default on interest and/or principal payments. Such securities are extremely speculative and should be valued on the basis of their ultimate recovery value in liquidation or reorganization of the obligor. DDD represents the highest potential for recovery on these securities and D represents the lowest potential for recovery.

Plus (+) or minus (-): Plus or minus signs are used to show relative standing within the major rating categories. Plus and minus signs, however, are not used in the DDD, DD, or D categories.

Short-Term Debt

Fitch’s short-term ratings apply to debt obligations that are payable on demand or have original maturities of up to three years, including commercial paper, certificates of deposit, medium-term notes, and investment notes.

F-1+ obligations have exceptionally strong credit quality and are considered to have the strongest degree of assurance for timely payment.

F-1 obligations are considered to reflect an assurance of timely payment only slightly less in degree than issues rated F-1+.

F-2 obligations are considered to have good credit quality. Securities in this class have a satisfactory degree of assurance for timely payment, but the margin of safety is not as great as for issues assigned F-1+ and F-1 ratings.

F-3 obligations are considered to have characteristics suggesting that the degree of assurance for timely payment is adequate; however, near-term adverse changes could cause these securities to be rated below investment grade.

F-S rating is assigned to obligations that are considered to have a minimal degree of assurance for timely payment and to be vulnerable to near-term adverse changes in financial and economic conditions.

B obligations are considered to have a minimal capacity for timely payment of financial commitments and a susceptibility to the adverse effects of changes in circumstances and economic conditions.

C rating is assigned to obligations that are considered to have a high default risk and whose capacity for meeting financial commitments is solely reliant upon a sustained, favorable business and economic environment.

D obligations are in actual or imminent payment default.

A-5

APPENDIX B — THE ADVISER’S PROXY VOTING POLICY AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (“CWAM”)

Proxy Policy and Procedures Manual

A.	ADMINISTRATION

VOTING CLIENT AND FUND PROXIES


Primary Responsibility		CWAM Stock Analyst/Portfolio Manager

Secondary Responsibility		CWAM Chief Investment Officer

Oversight Responsibility		CWAM Chief Operating Officer and Chief Compliance Officer

Issue Date		8/01/03; as amended on 4/09/10 and 12/08/10

POLICY:

All proxies for client securities for which Columbia Wanger Asset Management, LLC (“CWAM”) has been granted authority to vote shall be voted in a manner considered to be in the best interests of CWAM’s clients, including the Columbia Acorn Funds (“Acorn”) and Wanger Advisor Trust Funds (“WAT”) and their shareholders, without regard to any benefit to CWAM or its affiliates. Where CWAM retains voting authority, as for most client securities, CWAM shall examine each recommendation and vote against management’s recommendation, if, in its judgment, approval or adoption of the recommendation would be expected to impact adversely the current or potential market value of the issuer’s securities. References to the best interest of a client refer to the interest of the client in terms of the potential economic return on the client’s investment. In the event a client believes that its other interests require a different vote, CWAM shall vote as the client instructs. In limited cases where in CWAM is required to adhere to regulatory restrictions over ownership limits of certain securities, CWAM may delegate voting authority to an independent third party to vote in the shareholders best interest.

CWAM addresses potential material conflicts of interest by having each individual stock analyst review and vote each proxy for the stocks that he/she follows. For those proposals where the analyst is voting against management’s recommendation or where there is a variance from the guidelines contained herein, the CWAM Proxy Committee will determine the vote in the best interest of CWAM’s clients, without consideration of any benefit to CWAM, its affiliates or its other clients.

OVERVIEW:

CWAM’s policy is based upon its fiduciary obligation to act in its clients’ best interests and rules under the Investment Company Act of 1940 and the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, which impose obligations with respect to proxy voting on investment advisers and investment companies.

PROCEDURES:

I.	ACCOUNT POLICIES

Except as otherwise directed by the client, CWAM or ISS, an independent third party delegated to vote in place of CWAM, shall vote as follows:

Separately Managed Accounts

CWAM or ISS shall vote proxies on securities held in its separately managed accounts where the client has given CWAM proxy voting authority. CWAM currently has authority to vote proxies for the Fairfax County Employees’ Retirement System and Fleet Boston Financial Pension Plan but does not have authority to vote proxies for the State of Oregon.

B-1

Columbia Acorn Trust/Wanger Advisors Trust

CWAM or ISS shall vote proxies for portfolio securities held in the Acorn and WAT funds.

Columbia Thermostat Fund

To avoid any potential conflict of interest CWAM shall vote “echo vote” proxies for Columbia Thermostat Fund. Echo voting means that CWAM will vote the shares in the same proportion as the other shareholders of those funds.

CWAM Offshore Funds

CWAM or ISS shall vote proxies on securities held in the Wanger Investment Company PLC (Wanger US Smaller Companies and Wanger European Smaller Companies).

CWAM Subadvised Mutual Fund Accounts

The authority to vote proxies on securities held in various RiverSource Funds is reserved to the client. CWAM or ISS has authority to vote proxies on securities held in the Optimum Small Cap Growth Fund.

II.

PROXY COMMITTEE

CWAM has established a Proxy Committee, which consists of the Chief Investment Officer, the Chief Operating Officer and the Director of Accounting and Operations. The Chief Compliance Officer of CWAM serves as a non-voting member. For proxy voting purposes only, the Proxy Committee will also include the analyst who follows the portfolio security on which to be voted. The director of domestic research may serve as an alternate member for proxy voting purposes and to break a voting tie.

The functions of the Proxy Committee shall include, in part,

(a)

determine proxy votes as warranted under CWAM’s Proxy Voting Policy.

(b)

annual review of this Policy and Procedures Manual to ensure consistency with internal policies and legal and regulatory requirements,

(c)

annual review of existing Voting Guidelines and development of additional Voting Guidelines to assist in the review of proxy proposals, and

(d)

development and modification of Voting Procedures as it deems appropriate or necessary.

In determining the vote on any proposal for which it has responsibility, the Proxy Committee shall act in accordance with the policy stated above.

The Proxy Committee shall create a charter, which shall be consistent with this policy and procedure. The charter shall set forth the Committee’s purpose, membership and operation. The charter shall include procedures prohibiting a member from voting on a matter for which he or she has a conflict of interest by reason of a direct relationship with the issuer or other party affected by a given proposal, e.g., is a portfolio manager for an account of the issuer.

The Proxy Committee shall furnish to the trustees of Columbia Acorn Trust and of Wanger Advisors Trust copies of any modifications of this Policy and Procedures Manual (including any modification of the Voting Guidelines or Voting Procedures).

III.

VOTING GUIDELINES

Except under limited circumstances (described in Section IV) where CWAM delegates voting power to ISS, the stock analyst who follows the stock reviews all proxies and ballot items for which CWAM has authority to

B-2

vote. The analyst will consider the views of management on each proposal, and if these views are consistent with the CWAM Proxy Policy, will vote in favor of management. However, each analyst has the responsibility of independently analyzing each proposal and voting each proxy item on a case-by-case basis. CWAM votes, to the best of its ability, all proxies for which it receives ballots.

Following are some guidelines CWAM uses with respect to voting on specific matters:

Election of the Board of Directors

CWAM supports management’s recommendation for proposals for the election of directors or for an increase or decrease in the number of directors provided a majority of directors would be independent. When director elections are contested, the analyst’s recommendation and vote should be forwarded to the Proxy Committee for a full vote.

Approval of Independent Auditors

CWAM will generally support management in its annual appointment or approval of independent corporate auditors. An auditor will usually be thought of as independent unless the auditor receives more than 50% of its revenues from non-audit, non-tax, activities from the company and its affiliates. In those cases, the vote should be forwarded to the Proxy Committee for a full vote.

Compensation and Equity-Based Compensation Plans

While CWAM recognizes companies need to compete for talent, CWAM is generally opposed to compensation plans that substantially dilute ownership interest in a company, provide participants with excessive awards, or have inherently objectionable structural features. Specifically, for equity-based plans, if the proposed number of shares authorized for stock incentive or option programs (excluding authorized shares of expired or exercised options) exceed 10% of the currently outstanding shares overall or 3% for directors only, the proposal should be referred to the Proxy Committee. The Committee will then consider the circumstances surrounding the issue and vote in the best interests of the client.

Stock Purchase Plans

CWAM is generally in favor of employee stock purchase plans where employees are able to purchase stock at or near the market price. Except when excessive dilution is proposed analysts should vote in favor of these proposals without consulting the Proxy Committee.

Advisory Votes on Executive Compensation

CWAM is generally in favor of proposals to ratify executive compensation unless total compensation obviously appears excessive. In such instances analyst should vote against such proposals without referring them to the Proxy Committee.

CWAM will generally vote against proposals to ratify Golden Parachutes without referring them to the Proxy Committee.

CWAM analyst will vote on the frequency of advisory votes on executive compensation on a case-by-case basis without referring them to the Proxy Committee. However, when CWAM votes against executive compensation analyst should vote for annual advisory votes.

Corporate Governance Issues

CWAM will generally support resolutions to improve shareholder democracy and reduce the likelihood of management entrenchment or conflict-of-interest. All matters relating to corporate governance will be voted by

B-3

CWAM on a case-by-case basis using this basic premise. Analyst should vote in favor of proxy items under this premise without consulting the Proxy Committee. If an Analyst is uncertain or believes that a vote should be made contrary to this premise, then the recommendation should be brought to the Proxy Committee for a full vote.

Social and Corporate Responsibility Issues

CWAM believes that “ordinary business matters” are primarily the responsibility of management and should be approved solely by the corporation’s board of directors. However, proposals regarding social issues initiated by shareholders asking the company to disclose or amend certain business practices will be analyzed by the appropriate CWAM stock analyst and evaluated on a case-by-case basis. If an analyst believes that a vote against management is appropriate, he/she should refer the proposal to the full vote by the Proxy Committee.

“Blank Check” Proposals

Occasionally proxy statements ask that shareholders allow proxies to approve any other items in a “blank check” manner. Analysts should vote against such proposals without referring those to the Proxy Committee.

Majority Election Requirement for Directors

Occasionally proxy statements ask the shareholders to vote on whether to require a majority vote in the case of election of directors. Analysts should vote in favor of these proposals without consulting the Proxy Committee.

Abstention Votes

Voting proxies with respect to shares of foreign stocks may involve significantly greater effort and corresponding cost due to the variety of regulatory schemes and corporate practices in foreign countries. Oftentimes, there may be language barriers, which will mean that an English translation of proxy information may not be available. Or, a translation must be obtained or commissioned before the relevant shareholder meeting. Time frames between shareholder notification, distribution of proxy materials, book-closure and the actual meeting date may be too short to allow timely action. In situations like these and in others where CWAM believes that it is uncertain with regards to the information received or because the cost of voting a proxy could exceed the expected benefit, the CWAM analyst may elect to abstain from voting. If an analyst believes that an abstention vote is appropriate, he/she should refer the proposal to the full vote by the Proxy Committee.

Special Issues Voting Foreign Proxies

To vote shares in some countries, shares must be “blocked” by the custodian or depository for a specified number of days before the shareholder meeting. Blocked shares typically may not be traded until the day after the shareholder meeting. CWAM may refrain from voting a portion or all shares of foreign stocks subject to blocking restrictions where, in the judgment of the CWAM analyst, the benefit from voting the shares is outweighed by the interest of maintaining client liquidity in the shares. The decision to vote/not vote is made by the CWAM analyst and is generally made on a case-by-case basis based on relevant factors, including the length of the blocking period, the significance of the holding, and whether the stock is considered a long-term holding.

In cases where the CWAM analyst determines that CWAM should not vote a portion or all foreign proxy shares due to blocking markets, the CWAM librarian (or a substitute) should document the reasons for not voting the proxy.

B-4

IV.

VOTING PROCEDURES

The Proxy Committee has developed the following procedures to assist in the voting of proxies according to the Voting Guidelines set forth in Section III above. The Proxy Committee may revise these procedures from time to time, as it deems appropriate or necessary to effect the purposes of this Policy and Procedures.

For Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Advisors Trust

•

CWAM shall use Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), a third party vendor, to implement its proxy voting process. ISS shall provide record keeping services. ISS also will provide its internally generated proxy analysis, which can be used to help supplement the CWAM analyst’s research in the proxy voting process. In limited instances as described later in this section, CWAM may delegate voting power to ISS.

•

On a daily basis, the funds’ custodian shall send ISS a holding file detailing each domestic equity holding held in the funds. Information on equity holdings for the international portfolio shall be sent weekly.

•

ISS shall receive proxy material information from Proxy Edge or the custodian for the funds. This shall include issues to be voted upon, together with a breakdown of holdings for the funds.

•

Whenever a vote is solicited, ISS shall send CWAM a request to vote over a secure website. The CWAM librarian (or a substitute) will be responsible to check this website daily. The librarian will forward all materials to the appropriate CWAM analyst, who will review and complete the proxy ballot and return to the CWAM librarian or will refer one or more proposals to the Proxy Committee. The analyst will keep documentation (usually copies of email correspondence) of any proposals brought before the Proxy Committee and will instruct the CWAM librarian to vote the proposal in accordance with the Proxy Committee decision. The analyst will file Proxy Committee documentation under G:\Shared\ProxyComm. The CWAM librarian will promptly provide ISS the final instructions as how to vote the proxy. The Librarian will also periodically check to make sure analysts have filed the relevant documentation.

•

ISS shall have procedures in place to ensure that a vote is cast on every security holding maintained by the funds on which a vote is solicited unless otherwise directed by the analyst. On a yearly basis (or when requested), CWAM shall receive a report from ISS detailing CWAM’s voting for the previous period on behalf of the funds.

For All Other Accounts For Which CWAM Has Voting Authority

•

CWAM shall use the respective custodian for the account it advises to vote proxies. CWAM shall separately maintain voting records for these accounts.

•

The CWAM librarian will be responsible for obtaining all proxy materials from the custodian, forward these to the appropriate CWAM analyst who will review and complete the proxy ballot and return to the librarian or will refer one or more proposals to the Proxy Committee. The analyst will keep documentation (usually copies of email correspondence) of any proposals brought before the Proxy Committee and will instruct the CWAM librarian to vote the proposal in accordance with the Proxy Committee decision. The analyst will file Proxy Committee documentation under G:\Shared\ProxyComm. The CWAM librarian will promptly provide ISS the final instructions as how to vote the proxy. The Librarian will also periodically check to make sure analysts have filed the relevant documentation.

•

The CWAM librarian will be responsible for recording all voting records onto a spreadsheet, which will comprise the detail of how CWAM voted each proxy on behalf of the respective client. This spreadsheet shall comply with the appropriate record keeping requirements of the applicable rules and will be available to clients upon request.

B-5

Delegation of Proxy Voting to an Independent Third Party

From time to time, CWAM may face regulatory or compliance limits on the types or amounts of voting securities that it may purchase or hold for client accounts. Among other limits, federal, state, foreign regulatory restrictions, or company-specific ownership limits may restrict the total percentage of an issuer’s voting securities that CWAM can hold for clients (collectively, “Ownership Limits”).

The regulations or company-specific documents governing a number of these Ownership Limits Often focus upon holdings in voting securities. As a result, in limited circumstances in order to comply with such Ownership Limits and/or internal policies designed to comply with such limits, CWAM may delegate proxy voting in certain issuers to ISS, as a qualified, independent third party.

V.	ANNUAL REPORT

CWAM shall submit an annual report to the Chief Compliance Officer of the Funds for his distribution to the Board of Directors of the Columbia Acorn Trust and Wanger Adisors Trust addressing the following:

A summary of the Funds’ voting history for the period;

Votes cast contrary to the guidelines of this Policy;

Votes cast in opposition to management recommendations;

Votes cast in conformity with and in opposition to ISS recommendations;

Votes that involved potential conflict of interests;

The circumstances surrounding all voting abstentions, no votes and missed votes;

An assessment of the quality of service provided by ISS, as well as the reasonableness of its fees;

Significant matters considered by CWAM’s Proxy Committee; and

Recommendations for changes to this Policy.

The annual report should be submitted as soon as practicable after the close of the proxy voting season which normally concludes in June.

B-6

APPENDIX C — INFORMATION REGARDING PENDING AND SETTLED LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In June 2004, an action captioned John E. Gallus et al. v. American Express Financial Corp. and American Express Financial Advisors Inc., was filed in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs allege that they are investors in several American Express Company (now known as RiverSource) mutual funds and they purport to bring the action derivatively on behalf of those funds under the 1940 Act. The plaintiffs allege that fees allegedly paid to the defendants by the funds for investment advisory and administrative services are excessive. The plaintiffs seek remedies including restitution and rescission of investment advisory and distribution agreements. The plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to transfer this case to the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (the “District Court”). In response to defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint, the District Court dismissed one of plaintiffs’ four claims and granted plaintiffs limited discovery. Defendants moved for summary judgment in April 2007. Summary judgment was granted in the defendants’ favor on July 9, 2007. The plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals (the “Eighth Circuit”) on August 8, 2007. On April 8, 2009, the Eighth Circuit reversed summary judgment and remanded to the District Court for further proceedings. On August 6, 2009, defendants filed a writ of certiorari with the U.S. Supreme Court (the “Supreme Court”), asking the Supreme Court to stay the District Court proceedings while the Supreme Court considers and rules in a case captioned Jones v. Harris Associates, which involves issues of law similar to those presented in the Gallus case. On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Jones v. Harris Associates, and on April 5, 2010, the Supreme Court vacated the Eighth Circuit’s decision in this case and remanded the case to the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Jones v. Harris Associates. On December 9, 2010, the District Court reinstated its July 9, 2007 summary judgment order in favor of the defendants. On January 10, 2011, plaintiffs filed a notice of appeal with the Eighth Circuit.

In December 2005, without admitting or denying the allegations, American Express Financial Corporation (AEFC, which is now known as Ameriprise Financial), entered into settlement agreements with the SEC and Minnesota Department of Commerce (MDOC) related to market timing activities. As a result, AEFC was censured and ordered to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations of certain provisions of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, the 1940 Act, and various Minnesota laws. AEFC agreed to pay disgorgement of $10 million and civil money penalties of $7 million. AEFC also agreed to retain an independent distribution consultant to assist in developing a plan for distribution of all disgorgement and civil penalties ordered by the SEC in accordance with various undertakings detailed at http://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/ia-2451.pdf. Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates have cooperated with the SEC and the MDOC in these legal proceedings, and have made regular reports to RiverSource, Seligman and Threadneedle Funds’ Boards of Directors/Trustees.

On November 7, 2008, Ameriprise Financial acquired J.&W. Seligman & Co., Inc. (“Seligman”). In late 2003, Seligman conducted an extensive internal review concerning mutual fund trading practices. Seligman’s review, which covered the period 2001-2003, noted one arrangement that permitted frequent trading in certain open-end registered investment companies managed by Seligman (the “Seligman Funds”); this arrangement was in the process of being closed down by Seligman before September 2003. Seligman identified three other arrangements that permitted frequent trading, all of which had been terminated by September 2002. In January 2004, Seligman, on a voluntary basis, publicly disclosed these four arrangements to its clients and to shareholders of the Seligman Funds. Seligman also provided information concerning mutual fund trading practices to the SEC and the Office of the Attorney General of the State of New York (“NYAG”).

In September 2006, the NYAG commenced a civil action in New York State Supreme Court against Seligman, Seligman Advisors, Inc. (which is now known as Columbia Management Investment Distributors, Inc.), Seligman Data Corp. and Brian T. Zino (collectively, the “Seligman Parties”), alleging, in substance, that the Seligman Parties permitted various persons to engage in frequent trading and, as a result, the prospectus disclosure used by the registered investment companies then managed by Seligman was and had been misleading. The NYAG included other related claims and also claimed that the fees charged by Seligman to the Seligman Funds were excessive. On March 13, 2009, without admitting or denying any violations of law or

C-1

wrongdoing, the Seligman Parties entered into a stipulation of settlement with the NYAG and settled the claims made by the NYAG. Under the terms of the settlement, Seligman paid $11.3 million to four Seligman Funds. This settlement resolved all outstanding matters between the Seligman Parties and the NYAG. In addition to the foregoing matter, the New York staff of the SEC indicated in September 2005 that it was considering recommending to the Commissioners of the SEC the instituting of a formal action against Seligman and Seligman Advisors, Inc. relating to frequent trading in the Seligman Funds. Seligman responded to the staff in October 2005 that it believed that any action would be both inappropriate and unnecessary, especially in light of the fact that Seligman had previously resolved the underlying issue with the Independent Directors of the Seligman Funds and made recompense to the affected Seligman Funds. There have been no further developments with the SEC on this matter.

Ameriprise Financial and certain of its affiliates have historically been involved in a number of legal, arbitration and regulatory proceedings, including routine litigation, class actions, and governmental actions, concerning matters arising in connection with the conduct of their business activities. Ameriprise Financial believes that the Funds are not currently the subject of, and that neither Ameriprise Financial nor any of its affiliates are the subject of, any pending legal, arbitration or regulatory proceedings that are likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds. Ameriprise Financial is required to make 10-Q, 10-K and, as necessary, 8-K filings with the SEC on legal and regulatory matters that relate to Ameriprise Financial and its affiliates. Copies of these filings may be obtained by accessing the SEC website at www.sec.gov.

There can be no assurance that these matters, or the adverse publicity associated with them, will not result in increased fund redemptions, reduced sale of fund shares or other adverse consequences to the Funds. Further, although we believe proceedings are not likely to have a material adverse effect on the Funds or the ability of Ameriprise Financial or its affiliates to perform under their contracts with the Funds, these proceedings are subject to uncertainties and, as such, we are unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss that may result. An adverse outcome in one or more of these proceedings could result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties or other relief that could have a material adverse effect on the consolidated financial condition or results of operations of Ameriprise Financial.

C-2

APPENDIX D — MORE INFORMATION ABOUT CHOOSING A SHARE CLASS

Class A shares are offered at public offering price per share, which is NAV minus any front-end sales charge that applies. Class A shares may also be subject to a 1.00% CDSC upon redemption. Class C shares are offered at NAV and are subject to a 1.00% CDSC on redemptions within one year after purchase. The CDSCs are described in the Funds’ prospectuses. Class I and Class Z shares are offered at NAV and are not subject to a CDSC. See the Funds’ prospectuses for additional information about the various share classes offered by the Funds.

Front-End Sales Charge Reductions — Accounts Eligible for Aggregation

The following accounts are eligible for account value aggregation for purposes of the right of accumulation and letters of intent as described in the prospectuses offering Class A shares of the Funds:

•

Individual or joint accounts;

•

Roth and traditional Individual Retirement Accounts (IRAs), Simplified Employee Pension accounts (SEPs), Savings Investment Match Plans for Employees of Small Employers accounts (SIMPLEs) and Tax Sheltered Custodial Accounts (TSCAs);

•

Uniform Gifts to Minors Act (UGMA)/Uniform Transfers to Minors (UTMA) accounts for which you, your spouse, or your domestic partner is parent or guardian of the minor child;

•

Revocable trust accounts for which you or an immediate family member, individually, is the beneficial owner/grantor;

•

Accounts held in the name of your, your spouse’s, or your domestic partner’s sole proprietorship or single owner limited liability company or S corporation;

•

Qualified retirement plan assets, provided that you are the sole owner of the business sponsoring the plan, are the sole participant (other than a spouse) in the plan, and have no intention of adding participants to the plan; and

•

Investments in wrap accounts;

provided that each of the accounts identified above is invested in Class A, Class B, Class C, Class E, Class F, Class T, Class W and/or Class Z shares of the Funds.

The following accounts are not eligible for account value aggregation:

•

Accounts of pension and retirement plans with multiple participants, such as 401(k) plans (which are combined to reduce the sales charge for the entire pension or retirement plan and therefore are not used to reduce the sales charge for your individual accounts);

•

Accounts invested in Class I, Class R, Class R3, Class R4, Class R5 and/or Class Y shares of the Funds;

•

Investments in 529 plans, donor advised funds, variable annuities, variable life insurance products, or managed separate accounts;

•

Charitable and irrevocable trust accounts; and

•

Accounts holding shares of money market Funds that used the Columbia brand before May 1, 2010.

D-1

Sales Charge Waivers

Front-End Sales Charge Waivers (Class A Shares)

The following categories of investors may buy Class A shares at net asset value, without payment of any front-end sales charge that would otherwise apply:

•

Current or retired directors or trustees of the Columbia Funds, and officers or employees of Columbia Management or its affiliates, including the Adviser;¹

•

Current or retired Ameriprise Financial Services, Inc. financial advisors and employees of such financial advisors;¹

•

Registered representatives and other employees of affiliated or unaffiliated selling and/or servicing agents having a selling agreement with the Distributor;¹

•

Registered broker/dealer firms that have entered into a dealer agreement with the Distributor may buy Class A shares without paying a front-end sales charge for their investment account only;

•

Portfolio managers employed by any subadviser of the Columbia Funds;¹

•

Partners and employees of outside legal counsel to the Columbia Funds or the Columbia Funds’ directors trustees who regularly provide advice and services to the Columbia Funds, or to their directors or trustees;

•

Direct rollovers from qualified employee benefit plans, provided that the rollover involves a transfer to Class A shares in the same Fund or Columbia Fund;

•

Employees of Bank of America, its affiliates and subsidiaries;

•

Employees or partners of Marsico Capital Management, LLC (or its successors);

•

Individuals receiving a distribution from a Bank of America trust, fiduciary, custodial or other similar account may use the proceeds of that distribution to buy Class A shares without paying a front-end sales charge, as long as the proceeds are invested in the funds within 90 days of the date of distribution;

•

Any shareholder who owned shares of any fund of Columbia Acorn Trust (formerly named Liberty Acorn Trust) on September 29, 2000 (when all of the then outstanding shares of Columbia Acorn Trust were re-designated Class Z shares) and who since that time has remained a shareholder of any Columbia Fund, may buy Class A shares of any Columbia Fund without paying a front-end sales charge in those cases where a Columbia Fund Class Z share is not available;

•

Galaxy Fund shareholders prior to December 1, 1995; and shareholders who (i) bought Galaxy Fund Prime A shares without paying a front-end sales charge and received Class A shares in exchange for those shares during the Galaxy/Liberty Fund reorganization; and (ii) continue to maintain the account in which the Prime A shares were originally bought;

•

Separate accounts established and maintained by an insurance company which are exempt from registration under Section 3(c)(11); and

•

At a Columbia Fund’s discretion, front-end sales charges may be waived for shares issued in plans of reorganization, such as mergers, asset acquisitions and exchange offers, to which the Columbia Fund is a party.

¹	Including their spouses or domestic partners, children or step-children, parents, step-parents or legal guardians, and their spouse’s or domestic partner’s parents, step-parents, or legal guardians.

D-2

•

Purchases made:

•

With dividend or capital gain distributions from a Columbia Fund or from the same class of another Columbia Fund;

•

Through or under a wrap fee product or other investment product sponsored by a selling and/or servicing agent that charges an account management fee or other managed agency/asset allocation accounts or programs involving fee-based compensation arrangements that have or that clear trades through a selling and/or servicing agent that has a selling agreement with the Distributor;

•

Through state sponsored college savings plans established under Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code; or

•

Through banks, trust companies and thrift institutions, acting as fiduciaries.

•

Through “employee benefit plans” created under section 401(a), 401(k), 457 and 403(b), and qualified deferred compensation plans, that have a plan level or omnibus account maintained with a Columbia Fund or the Transfer Agent and transacts directly with the Columbia Fund or the Transfer Agent through a third party administrator or third party recordkeeper.

Investors can also buy Class A shares without paying a sales charge if the purchase is made from the proceeds of a sale from Columbia Fund Class A, B, C or T shares (other than Columbia Money Market Fund or Columbia Government Money Market Fund) within 90 days, up to the amount of the sales proceeds. In addition, shareholders of the money market fund series of BofA Funds Series Trust, which were formerly referred to as the Columbia Money Market Funds (the Former Columbia Money Market Funds), can also buy Class A shares of the Columbia Funds without paying a sales charge if the purchase is made from the proceeds of a sale of shares from a Former Columbia Money Market Fund within 90 days, up to the amount of the sales proceeds, provided that the proceeds are from the sale of shares of a Former Columbia Money Market Fund purchased on or before April 30, 2010. To be eligible for these reinstatement privileges the purchase must be made into an account for the same owner, but does not need to be into the same Columbia Fund from which the shares were sold. The Transfer Agent, Distributor or their agents must receive a written reinstatement request within 90 days after the shares are sold and the purchase of Class A shares through this reinstatement privilege will be made at the NAV of such shares next calculated after the request is received in good order.

Restrictions may apply to certain accounts and certain transactions. The Funds may change or cancel these terms at any time. Any change or cancellation applies only to future purchases. Unless you provide your financial advisor with information in writing about all of the factors that may count toward a waiver of the sales charge, there can be no assurance that you will receive all of the waivers for which you may be eligible. You should request that your financial advisor provide this information to the Funds when placing your purchase order. For more information about the sales charge reductions and waivers described here, as well as additional categories of eligible investors, please see the applicable prospectus.

Contingent Deferred Sales Charges (Class A, Class B and Class C Shares)

Shareholders won’t pay a CDSC upon redemption of Class A and Class C shares:

•

In the event of the shareholder’s death;

•

For which no sales commission or transaction fee was paid to an authorized selling agent at the time of purchase;

•

Purchased through reinvestment of dividend and capital gain distributions;

•

In an account that has been closed because it falls below the minimum account balance;

•

That result from required minimum distributions taken from retirement accounts upon the shareholder’s attainment of age 70¹/2.

D-3

•

That result from returns of excess contributions made to retirement plans or individual retirement accounts, so long as the selling agent returns the applicable portion of any commission paid by the Distributor;

•

Of Class A shares of a Fund initially purchased by an employee benefit plan;

•

Of Class C shares of a Fund initially purchased by an employee benefit plan that are not connected with a plan level termination; and

•

At a Columbia Fund’s discretion, issued in connection with plans of reorganization, including but not limited to mergers, asset acquisitions and exchange offers, to which the Columbia Fund is a party.

Shareholders won’t pay a CDSC upon redemption of Class B shares:

•

In the event of the shareholder’s death; and

•

That result from required minimum distributions taken from retirement accounts upon the shareholder’s attainment of age 70¹/2.

Shareholders won’t pay a CDSC upon redemptions of Class A, Class B or Class C shares:

•

after the sole shareholder on an individual account or a joint tenant on a joint tenant account becomes disabled (as defined by Section 72(m)(7) of the Code). To be eligible for such a waiver: (i) the disability must arise after the account is opened and (ii) a letter from a physician must be signed under penalty of perjury stating the nature of the disability. If the account is transferred to a new registration and then shares are sold, the applicable CDSC will be charged.*

•

by health savings accounts sponsored by third party platforms, including those sponsored by Bank of America affiliates (for shares purchased prior to September 7, 2010).*

•

made to cover medical payments that exceed 7.5% of income (for shares purchased prior to September 7, 2010).*

•

made to pay for medical insurance by an individual who has separated from employment and who has received unemployment compensation under a federal or state program for at least twelve weeks.*

•

occurring pursuant to a Systematic Withdrawal Plan (SWP) established with the Transfer Agent, to the extent that the sales do not exceed, on an annual basis, 12% of the account’s value as long as distributions are reinvested (for shares purchased prior to September 7, 2010). Otherwise, a CDSC will be charged on SWP sales until this requirement is met.

•

by certain group retirement plans held in omnibus accounts (except for Class B shares). CDSCs may be waived on redemptions of Class A shares initially purchased by an employee benefit plan. However, CDSC may not be waived for Class C shares if the waiver would occur as a result of a plan-level termination.

•

in connection with distributions from qualified retirement plans, government (Section 457) plans, individual retirement accounts or custodial accounts under Section 403(b)(7) of the Code following normal retirement or the attainment of age 59¹/2 (for shares purchased prior to September 7, 2010).**

•

in connection with loans from qualified retirement plans to shareholders (for all Class B shares and for Class A and Class C shares purchased prior to September 7, 2010).*

*	Shareholders and selling and/or servicing agents must inform the Fund or the Transfer Agent in writing that the shareholder qualifies for the particular sales charge waiver and provide proof thereof.

For direct trades on non-prototype retirement accounts where the date of birth of the shareholder is not maintained, the shareholder or selling and/or servicing agent must inform the Fund or the Transfer Agent in writing that the shareholders qualifies for the particular sales charge waiver and provide proof thereof.

D-4

Restrictions may apply to certain accounts and certain transactions. The Distributor may, in its sole discretion, authorize the waiver of the CDSC for additional classes of investors. The Funds may change or cancel these terms at any time. Any change or cancellation applies only to future purchases. For more information about the sales charge reductions and waivers described here, as well as additional categories of eligible redemptions, see the Funds’ prospectuses.

Minimum Initial Investment in Class Z Shares

Class Z shares are available only to certain eligible investors, which are subject to different minimum initial investment requirements described in the Funds’ prospectuses for Class Z shares. In addition to the categories of Class Z investors described in the prospectuses, the minimum initial investments in Class Z shares are as follows:

•

There is no minimum initial investment in Class Z shares for any health savings account sponsored by a third party platform, including those sponsored by affiliates of Bank of America.

•

The minimum initial investment in Class Z shares for the following categories of eligible investors is $2,000:

•

Any client of Bank of America or one of its subsidiaries buying shares through an asset management company, trust, fiduciary, retirement plan administration or similar arrangement with Bank of America or the subsidiary.

•

Any employee (or family member of an employee) of Bank of America or one of its subsidiaries.

•

Any investor buying shares through a Columbia Management state tuition plan organized under Section 529 of the Internal Revenue Code.

•

Any trustee or director (or family member of a trustee or director) of a fund distributed by the Distributor.

Class B Shares — Conversion to Class A Shares

In general, the Funds’ Class B shares convert to Class A shares after eight years. The following rules apply to the conversion of Class B shares to Class A shares:

•

Class B shares are converted on or about the 15th day of the month that they become eligible for conversion. For purposes of determining the month when your Class B shares are eligible for conversion, the start of the holding period is the first day of the month in which your purchase was made.

•

Any shares you received from reinvested distributions on these shares generally will convert to Class A shares at the same time.

•

You’ll receive the same dollar value of Class A shares as the Class B shares that were converted. Class B shares that you received from an exchange of Class B shares of another Fund will convert based on the day you bought the original shares.

•

No sales charge or other charges apply, and conversions are free from U.S. federal income tax.

D-5