10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[X] Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2011

or

[   ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

Commission file number 1-7265

AMBASE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Delaware   (State of incorporation) 95-2962743   (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

100 PUTNAM GREEN, 3RD FLOOR

GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT  06830

(Address of principal executive offices)     (Zip Code)

(203) 532-2000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

YES     X        NO  ______

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large Accelerated Filer    Accelerated Filer     Non-Accelerated Filer   X    Smaller Reporting Company ____

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

YES       NO     X    .

At July 30, 2011, there were 43,075,410 shares outstanding of the registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value per share.

AmBase Corporation

Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q

June 30, 2011

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	Page
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)	1
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	14
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	16
Item 4T.	Controls and Procedures	17
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	18
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	18
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity and Securities and Use of Proceeds	18
Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	18
Item 5.	Other Information	18
Item 6.	Exhibits	18
Signatures		19

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except for share and per share mounts)

Assets:	June 30, 2011			December 31, 2010
Cash and cash equivalents	$	893		$	1,334
Held to maturity investments (market value $7,700 and $8,199, respectively)		7,700			8,200
Real estate owned:
Land		554			554
Buildings		1,900			1,900
Real estate owned, gross	$	2,454			2,454
Accumulated depreciation		(509	)		(485	)
Real estate owned, net		1,945			1,969
Other assets		296			259
Total assets	$	10,834		$	11,762
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity:
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	$	138		$	220
Other liabilities		6			2
Total liabilities		144			222
Commitments and contingencies (Note 3)
Stockholders’ equity:
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 200,000,000 authorized, 46,410,007 issued and 43,075,410 outstanding in 2011 and 2010)		464			464
Additional paid-in capital		548,044			548,044
Accumulated deficit		(535,709	)		(534,859	)
Treasury stock, at cost - 3,334,597 shares		(2,109	)		(2,109	)
Total stockholders’ equity		10,690			11,540
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	10,834		$	11,762

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Operations

Second Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30

(Unaudited)

(in thousands, except per share data)

	Second Quarter						Six Months
	2011			2010			2011			2010
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits	$	336		$	359		$	668		$	776
Professional and outside services		84			101			137			151
Property operating and maintenance		21			37			50			69
Depreciation		12			12			24			25
Insurance		11			17			19			24
Other operating		20			22			47			52
Total operating expenses		484			548			945			1,097
Operating loss		(484	)		(548	)		(945	)		(1,097	)
Interest income		2			4			5			9
Realized gains on sales of investment securities		9			9			15			19
Other income		105			-			105			-
Loss before income taxes		(368	)		(535	)		(820	)		(1,069	)
Income tax expense		(15	)		(11	)		(30	)		(22	)
Net loss	$	(383	)	$	(546	)	$	(850	)	$	(1,091	)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - basic	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders - assuming dilution	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.01	)	$	(0.02	)	$	(0.02	)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Basic		43,075			43,075			43,075			43,075
Weighted average common shares outstanding - Assuming dilution		43,075			43,075			43,075			43,075

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Six Months Ended June 30

(Unaudited)

(in thousands)	2011			2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$	(850	)	$	(1,091	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		24			25
Realized gains on sales of investment securities		(15	)		(19	)
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable on investment securities		-			8
Other assets		(37	)		35
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities		(82	)		(174	)
Other liabilities		4			(5	)
Net cash used by operating activities		(956	)		(1,221	)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Maturities of investment securities - held to maturity		16,096			19,384
Purchases of investment securities - held to maturity		(15,596	)		(18,394	)
Sales of investment securities		552			649
Purchases of investments securities		(537	)		(630	)
Investment in real estate limited partnership		-			(300	)
Net cash provided by investing activities		515			709
Net change in cash and cash equivalents		(441	)		(512	)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year		1,334			1,715
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	893		$	1,203
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
Income taxes paid	$	41		$	65

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 1 - Organization

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of AmBase Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) are unaudited and subject to year-end adjustments. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments unless otherwise disclosed, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions, that it deems reasonable, that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from such estimates and assumptions. The unaudited interim financial statements presented herein are condensed and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements filed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The Company’s assets currently consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, and real estate.  The Company currently earns non-operating revenue principally consisting of earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents.  The Company continues to evaluate a number of possible acquisitions, and is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities, including the contingent assets, as described in Part II - Item 1.  From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings.  The Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements.

The Company’s management believes that operating cash needs for the next twelve months will be met principally by the Company’s current financial resources and to a lesser extent the receipt of earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents.

Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There are no new accounting pronouncements that would materially affect the Company’s financial statements.

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 3 - Legal Proceedings

The information contained inItem 8 - Note 10 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, is incorporated by reference herein and the defined terms set forth below have the same meaning ascribed to them in that report.  There have been no material developments in such legal proceedings, except as set forth below.

The Company is or has been a party in a number of lawsuits or proceedings, including the following:

Supervisory Goodwill Litigation - On February 12 and 17, 2009, the Court heard closing arguments.  At the conclusion of closing arguments, the Court ruled that the FDIC and DOJ could file short supplemental briefs addressing certain limited issues by March 6, 2009, and that the Company could file a short responsive brief which was filed on March 25, 2009.  In May 2009, the DOJ requested and simultaneously filed with the Court an additional supplemental brief.  The Court granted the DOJ’s motion and permitted the DOJ’s additional supplemental brief.  The Company subsequently requested and the Court allowed the Company to file a responsive supplemental brief to the DOJ brief which was filed in June 2009.  The Company does not know when the Court will issue its final decision.  The Company believes any decision rendered by Judge Smith on damages, as well as his decision relating to his authority to review and consider the validity of the alleged receivership deficit, will likely be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Both the Court of Federal Claims and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have issued numerous decisions in cases that involve claims against the United States based upon its breach of its contracts with savings and loan institutions through its 1989 enactment of FIRREA. In particular, the Federal Circuit has issued decisions rejecting Takings Clause claims advanced by shareholders of failed thrifts. Examples of such decisions include Castle v. United States, 301 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2002) and Bailey v. United States, 341 F. 3d 1342 (Fed. Cir 2003). In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari filed by Bailey.  The Court of Federal Claims decisions and certain filings in the Company’s case, as well as other decisions in Winstar related cases, are publicly available on the Court of Federal Claims web site at www.uscfc.uscourts.gov.  In addition, decisions in Winstar-related cases that have been issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals, the court that hears appeals from decisions by the Court of Federal Claims, may be found on that court’s website at www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Decisions in other Winstar related cases may be relevant to the Company’s Supervisory Goodwill claims, but are not necessarily indicative of the ultimate outcome of the Company’s actions. The Company can give no assurances regarding the ultimate outcome of the Supervisory Goodwill Litigation.

Federal income tax refund suit on Carryback Claims.  In March 2000, the Company filed with the IRS several claims and amendments to previously filed claims with respect to the Carryback Claims, seeking refunds from the IRS of alternative minimum tax and other federal income taxes paid by the Company in prior years, plus applicable IRS interest, based on the filing of the 1992 Amended Return.  In February 2005, the IRS formally disallowed the Carryback Claims.  On April 29, 2008, the Company filed suit with respect to the Carryback Claims in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, seeking federal tax refunds for tax year 1989, plus interest.  On September 29, 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), representing defendant United States in the suit, filed a Motion to Dismiss.  In response, on October 19, 2009, the Company filed its opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss, as well as the Company’s own Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.  In June 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision conditionally granting the United States’ Motion to Dismiss the case but allowing the Company to conduct limited discovery to establish whether the Court has jurisdiction.  On August 30, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to Set Aside the Court’s Conditional Order of Dismissal.  On February 28, 2011, the Court granted the Company’s motion and issued a Memorandum of Decision concluding that the Company had timely filed a refund claim for tax year 1992 seeking to adjust the amount of bad debt deduction and that the case should not be dismissed.  In March 2011, the Company filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment based on the Court’s ruling that the Company’s refund claims were timely filed.  In May 2011, the DOJ filed a Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and an opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion.  In June 2011, the Company filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and a Reply to the Governments Opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion, and the Government in June 2011, subsequently filed a response brief. The Court’s rulings to date are not dispositive of the case.  The Company can give no assurances as to the final amount of refunds, if any, or when they might be received.  See Note 8 – Income Taxes for further information.

Note 4 - Cash and Cash Equivalents

Highly liquid investments, consisting principally of funds held in short-term money market accounts with original maturities of less than three months, are classified as cash equivalents.

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 5 - Investment Securities

Investment securities - held to maturity, consist of U.S. Treasury Bills with original maturities of three months or more and are carried at amortized cost (which includes accrued interest), based upon the Company’s intent and ability to hold these investments to maturity.

Investment securities consist of the following:

	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
(in thousands)	Carrying Value		Cost or Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Cost or Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Held to Maturity:
U.S. Treasury Bills	$	7,700	$	7,700	$	7,700	$	8,200	$	8,200	$	8,199

The gross unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities consist of the following:

(in thousands)

Held to Maturity:	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Gross unrealized gains (losses)	$	-	$	(1	)

Realized gains on the sales of investment securities available for sale follow:

(in thousands)

($ in thousands)	Second Quarter Ending June 30								Year-to-Date June 30
	2011				2010				2011				2010
Net sale proceeds		$	435			$	440			$	552			$	649
Cost basis			(426	)			(431	)			(537	)			(630	)
Realized gains		$	9			$	9			$	15			$	19

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 6 – Property Owned

The Company owns one commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut that contains approximately 14,500 square feet.  The Company utilizes approximately 3,500 square feet for its executive offices; the remaining space is currently unoccupied and available for lease.  Depreciation expense for the building is calculated on a straight-line basis over 39 years. Tenant improvements, if any, would be depreciated over the lesser of the remaining life of the tenants’ lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

Although the portion of the building not being utilized by the Company is currently unoccupied and available for lease, based on the Company’s analysis, the Company believes the property’s fair value exceeds the property’s current carrying value.  The Company’s impairment analysis includes a comprehensive range of factors including but not limited to:  the location of the property; property condition; current market conditions; comparable sales; current market rents in the area; new building zoning restrictions; raw land values; new building construction costs; building operating costs; leasing values; and cap rates for comparable buildings in the area.  Varying degrees of weight are given each factor.  Based on the Company’s analysis these factors taken together and/or considered individually form the basis for the Company’s analysis that no impairment condition exists.

The Company performs impairment tests if events or circumstances indicate that the property’s carrying value would not be recoverable.  As noted above, based on the Company’s analysis the Company believes the carrying value of the property as of June 30, 2011, has not been impaired and; therefore, the carrying value of the asset is fully recoverable by the Company.

Note 7 - Income Taxes

The Company and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return.  The Company recognizes both the current and deferred tax consequences of all transactions that have been recognized in the financial statements, calculated based on the provisions of enacted tax laws, including the tax rates in effect for current and future years.  Net deferred tax assets are recognized immediately when a more likely than not criterion is met; that is, greater than 50% probability exists that the tax benefits will actually be realized sometime in the future.

The Company has calculated a net deferred tax asset of $40 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, arising primarily from net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credits.  This amount does not include the anticipated tax effects of NOL’s which could be generated from the Company’s investment in Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. and subsidiaries (“Carteret”), resulting from the election decision, as more fully described below. A valuation allowance has been established for the entire net deferred tax asset as management, at the current time, has no basis to conclude that realization is more likely than not.

There were no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. Further, no significant changes in unrecognized income tax benefits are currently expected to occur over the next year.  Interest and/or penalties related to underpayments of income taxes, if applicable, would be included in interest expense and operating expenses, respectively. The accompanying financial statements do not include any amounts for any such interest and/or penalties.  The Company’s federal income tax returns for the years subsequent to 1992 have not been reviewed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or state authorities.  In October 2009, the Company received notification from the IRS that they would be reviewing the Company’s 2007 federal income tax return.  In connection with the IRS audit, in April 2010, the IRS issued the Company a Notice of Proposed Adjustment for tax year 2007, proposing to disallow approximately $16.6 million of deductions previously recognized by the Company on its 2007 Federal income tax return (the “IRS Proposed Adjustment”).  The IRS Proposed Adjustment seeks to disallow the Company’s tax deduction for the payment made by the Company in 2007 in satisfaction of its Supplemental Retirement Plan obligation.  This matter is currently ongoing.  The Company has not been notified of any potential tax audits by any state or local tax authorities.  As such, the Company believes the statute of limitations for federal and state purposes are generally closed for tax years prior to 2007.

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Based upon the Company’s federal income tax returns as filed through 2009 (subject to IRS audit adjustments), excluding all effects of the inclusion of Carteret/Carteret FSB from December 4, 1992 forward, as further discussed herein, the Company has NOL carryforwards available to reduce future federal taxable income which expire if unused in the tax years as indicated below.  The amounts as of June 30, 2011, are as follows:

Tax Year Expiring	Amount
2012	$	1,100,000
2018		5,400,000
2019		4,000,000
2020		2,600,000
2021		4,000,000
2022		3,200,000
2023		1,800,000
2024		700,000
2026		2,800,000
2027		3,100,000
2028		4,600,000
2029		2,400,000
Total	$	35,700,000

In addition to the NOL carryforwards noted herein, the Company currently estimates that, an additional $16.7 million of NOL carryforwards could be generated from the 2007 tax year which would expire if unused in the 2027 tax year, however, as discussed above, in connection with the IRS’s 2007 Federal income tax return audit, the IRS is proposing to disallow approximately $16.6 million of the NOL carry forwards generated from the 2007 tax year; this matter is ongoing.  Additionally, approximately $2.0 million of NOL carryforwards could be generated from the 2010 tax year which would expire if unused in the 2030 tax year. In the 2010 tax year, approximately $5.3 million of NOL carryforwards originating from the 1995 tax year expired to the extent they remain unused and in the 2009 tax year, approximately $2.2 million of NOL carryforwards originating from the 1994 tax year expired to the extent they remain unused.  The unused carryforwards will have expired unless they are utilized in prior tax years or absorbed in an earlier year based on inclusion of certain items in the consolidated group.  The utilization of certain carryforwards and carrybacks is subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax laws.  In addition, the Company has approximately $21 million of AMT credit carryforwards (“AMT Credits”), which are not subject to expiration.  Based on the filing of the Carryback Claims, as defined further above, the Company would seek to utilize approximately $8 million of the $21 million of AMT Credits.

As a result of the Office of Thrift Supervision’s December 4, 1992 placement of Carteret in receivership, under the management of the Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”)/Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), and then proposed Treasury Reg. §1.597-4(g), the Company had previously filed its 1992 and subsequent federal income tax returns with Carteret disaffiliated from the Company’s consolidated federal income tax return. Based upon the impact of Treasury Reg. §1.597-4(g), which was issued in final form on December 20, 1995, a continuing review of the Company’s tax basis in Carteret, and the impact of prior year tax return adjustments on the Company’s 1992 federal income tax return as filed, the Company decided not to make an election pursuant to final Treasury Reg. §1.597-4(g) to disaffiliate Carteret from the Company’s consolidated federal income tax return effective as of December 4, 1992 (the “Election Decision”).

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The Company has made numerous requests to the RTC/FDIC for tax information pertaining to Carteret and the resulting successor institution, Carteret Federal Savings Bank (“Carteret FSB”); however all of the information still has not been received. The Company believes, as a result of remaining consolidated with Carteret FSB for federal income tax return purposes, that the Company’s tax basis in its investment in Carteret/Carteret FSB can be converted into NOL’s, as tax losses are incurred,  which could be available to carryforward/carryback into various federal income tax return years. However; since all of the Carteret FSB tax information has not been received, the Company is unable to determine with certainty, the amount of or the years in which any NOL’s may ultimately be generated; if the NOL carryforwards/carrybacks will be utilized in prior federal income tax return years; or the final expiration dates of any of the NOL carryforwards/carrybacks ultimately generated.

Based on information received to date, and prior to the recognition of the 1992 tax losses reflected on the Company’s 1992 amended federal income tax return, as further described below, the Company estimated that as of December 1992 it had a remaining tax basis related to its investment in Carteret/Carteret FSB of approximately $158 million. Based on the Company’s Election Decision, described above, and the receipt of some of the requested information from the RTC/FDIC, the Company amended its 1992 consolidated federal income tax return to include the federal income tax effects of Carteret and Carteret FSB, (the “1992 Amended Return”). The Company is still in the process of reviewing its consolidated federal income tax returns for 1993 and subsequent years.

The Company expects that the 1992 Amended Return will generate approximately $56 million of NOL’s for tax year 1992, which the Company is seeking to carryback to prior tax years to produce refunds of tax previously paid. The 1992 Amended Return has not yet been accepted by the IRS. See “Carryback Claims,” below for further information. As part of the 1992 Amended Return, approximately $56 million, (of the $158 million), of Carteret/Carteret FSB tax basis is expected to be converted into NOL’s, (as tax losses are incurred) in tax year 1992, and will have expired in the 2007 tax year, unless they are utilized as part of the “Carryback Claims,” or absorbed in earlier years based on inclusion of certain items in the consolidated group.

The Carteret/Carteret FSB tax basis, of approximately $102 million, remaining after recognition of the 1992 Amended Return, may be converted into NOL carryforwards/carrybacks as additional tax losses are incurred by Carteret/Carteret FSB and may be carried back or carried forward to other tax years; may be utilized in other tax years; or could begin to expire no earlier than the 2008 tax year based upon the year any NOL’s are ultimately generated. The Company can give no assurances with regard to the 1992 Amended Return, subsequent year returns, or the final amount or expiration of NOL carryforwards/carrybacks ultimately generated, if any, from the Company’s tax basis in Carteret/Carteret FSB. Any NOL’s ultimately generated from the Company’s tax basis in Carteret/Carteret FSB, would be in addition to the NOL carryforwards/carrybacks generated based on the Company’s federal income tax returns as previously filed, as further detailed above.

In March 2000, the Company filed with the IRS several claims and amendments to previously filed claims with respect to the Carryback Claims, seeking refunds from the IRS of alternative minimum tax and other federal income taxes paid by the Company in prior years, plus applicable IRS interest, based on the filing of the 1992 Amended Return.  In February 2005, the IRS formally disallowed the Carryback Claims.  On April 29, 2008, the Company filed suit with respect to the Carryback Claims in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, seeking federal tax refunds for tax year 1989, plus interest.  On September 29, 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), representing defendant United States in the suit, filed a Motion to Dismiss.  In response, on October 19, 2009, the Company filed its opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss, as well as the Company’s own Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.  In June 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision conditionally granting the United States’ Motion to Dismiss the case but allowing the Company to conduct limited discovery to establish whether the Court has jurisdiction.  On August 30, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to Set Aside the Court’s Conditional Order of Dismissal.  On February 28, 2011, the Court granted the Company’s motion and issued a Memorandum of Decision concluding that the Company had timely filed a refund claim for tax year 1992 seeking to adjust the amount of bad debt deduction and that the case should not be dismissed.  In March 2011, the Company filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment based on the Court’s ruling that the Company’s refund claims were timely filed.  In May 2011, the DOJ filed a Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and an opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion.  In June 2011, the Company filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and a Reply to the Governments Opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion, and the Government in June 2011, subsequently filed a response brief. The Court’s rulings to date are not dispositive of the case. The Company can give no assurances as to the final amount of refunds, if any, or when they might be received.  See Note 3 – Legal Proceedings for further information.

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The FDIC has previously filed a federal income tax return for Carteret FSB for 1995 (as well as other years),  which indicates that Carteret FSB allegedly could owe a 1995 federal income tax liability of $32 million, which including interest and penalty thereon, is alleged to be in excess of $120 million. The FDIC has stated to the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Claims”) that the tax amounts are only estimates and are highly contingent.  However, it is possible that the IRS may try to collect the alleged Carteret FSB federal income taxes from the Carteret FSB receivership.

The Company believes the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns filed by the FDIC were improperly filed and are neither accurate nor valid.  The FDIC, as indicated above, continues to report the 1995 federal income tax liability, including interest and penalty, as a component of the alleged Carteret FSB receivership deficit. As part of the Supervisory Goodwill legal proceedings, the Company presented to the Court of Claims various arguments to support the position that no federal income tax would be owed as a result of the Carteret FSB receivership operations for tax year 1995; however, the Department of Justice and the FDIC have stated to the Court of Claims that they do not believe the Court of Claims has jurisdiction over that issue. The Supervisory Goodwill proceedings remain pending in the Court of Claims. Based on the information received to date, if the correct Carteret FSB federal income tax results were included with the Company’s originally filed federal income tax returns, the Company based upon consultation with its legal and tax advisors believes that no additional material federal income tax would be owed by the Company, although this cannot be assured because a contrary result is possible, given the uncertainty with various legal and factual assumptions underlying the Company’s beliefs. This assessment included among other items, a review of the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns as prepared by the FDIC and the correction of errors originally reported therein, the proper application of federal NOL carryforwards and carrybacks, and the adherence to statute of limitation provisions contained in the Internal Revenue Code, as amended.

As explained above, although the Company does not believe that Carteret FSB or the Company will have a material federal income tax liability related to Carteret FSB for tax year 1995 (or any other tax year), the Company can give no assurances of the final amounts, if any, of federal income taxes owed by the Carteret FSB receivership or by the Company as a result of the Carteret FSB receivership operations. The Company is continuing to try to resolve these matters as part of the Supervisory Goodwill legal process and is also continuing to review the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns and the results of their inclusion with the Company’s federal income tax returns as previously filed. The Company is pursuing the Carryback Claims, as further described above, which could have an impact on the analysis of the prior year tax information. For further information on the Supervisory Goodwill legal proceedings, see Note 3 herein. The discussion of the Carteret FSB federal income tax results is intended to provide details as to the potential inter-relationship of the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns with the Company’s federal income tax positions. It is not a reflection of any federal income tax liability of the Company arising from the Carteret receivership operations.

Note 8 – Stock-Based Compensation

Under the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1993 Plan”), the Company may grant to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, stock options (“Options”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock awards (“Restricted Stock”), merit awards (“Merit Awards”) and performance share awards (“Performance Shares”), through May 28, 2018. An aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the 1993 Plan (upon the exercise of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, upon awards of Restricted Stock and Performance Shares); however, of such shares, only 2,500,000 shares in the aggregate shall be available for issuance for Restricted Stock Awards and Merit Awards. Such shares shall be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.  Options may be granted as incentive stock options (“ISOs”) intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Federal tax law or as nonqualified stock options (“NQSOs”). SARs may be granted with respect to any Options granted under the 1993 Plan and may be exercised only when the underlying Option is exercisable. The 1993 Plan requires that the exercise price of all Options and SARs be equal to or greater than the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant of that Option. The term of any ISO or related SAR cannot exceed ten years from the date of grant, and the term of any NQSO cannot exceed ten years and one month from the date of grant. Subject to the terms of the 1993 Plan and any additional restrictions imposed at the time of grant, Options and any related SARs ordinarily will become exercisable commencing one year after the date of grant. Options granted generally have a ten year contractual life and generally have vesting terms of two years from the date of grant. In the case of a “Change of Control” of the Company (as defined in the 1993 Plan), Options granted pursuant to the 1993 Plan may become fully exercisable as to all optioned shares from and after the date of such Change of Control in the discretion of the Committee or as may otherwise be provided in the grantee’s Option agreement. Death, retirement, or absence for disability will not result in the cancellation of any Options.

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

The fair values of option awards were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model (“Black-Scholes”) that uses certain assumptions at the time of valuation. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is estimated based on the contractual lives of option grants, option vesting period and historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury bond yield in effect at the time of grant.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based award and stock price volatility. The assumptions utilized were management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, our recorded stock-based compensation expense could have been materially different from the amounts previously recorded. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, the share-based compensation expense could be materially different.  The Company believes that the use of the Black-Scholes model meets the fair value measurement objectives of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reflects all substantive characteristics of the instruments being valued.

Incentive plan activity during the year-to-date period is summarized as follows:

	Number of Shares Under Option		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2011	836,000		$	0.87
Expired	(20,000	)		0.60
Outstanding at June 30, 2011	816,000		$	0.87	1.99	$	-
Exercisable at June 30, 2011	816,000		$	0.87	1.99	$	-

Information relating to the 1993 Plan as of the dates indicated below is as follows:

	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010
Unamortized compensation cost relating to non-vested stock   options	$	-	$	-
Stock based compensation expense recorded for the year-to-date   period	$	-	$	-
Options to purchase shares of common stock which were excluded from computation of diluted earnings per share due to the effect of being anti-dilutive in the computation of earnings per share.		816,000		836,000
Shares available for future stock option grants		4,184,000

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

Note 9 - Pension and Savings Plans

The Company sponsors the AmBase 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”), which is a “Section 401(k) Plan” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).  The Savings Plan permits eligible employees to make contributions of up to 30% of compensation, which are matched by the Company at a percentage determined annually.  Effective July 1, 2010, the employer match was reduced to 33% of the amount the employee elects to defer. Employee contributions to the Savings Plan are invested at the employee’s discretion, in various investment funds.  The Company’s matching contributions are invested in the same manner as the compensation reduction contributions.  All contributions are subject to maximum limitations contained in the Code.  The Company’s matching contributions to the Savings Plan, charged to expense, were as follows

	June 30, 2011				Six Months Ended June 30
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Company matching contributions	$	4,000	$	6,000	$	16,000	$	41,000

Note 10 - Common Stock Repurchase Plan

In January 2002, the Company announced a common stock repurchase plan (the “Repurchase Plan”) which allows for the repurchase by the Company of up to 10 million shares of its common stock in the open market.

The Repurchase Plan is conditioned upon favorable business conditions and acceptable prices for the common stock. Purchases under the Repurchase Plan may be made, from time to time, in the open market, through block trades or otherwise. Depending on market conditions and other factors, purchases may be commenced or suspended any time or from time to time without prior notice.

	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share (including Broker Commissions)		Total Number Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans		Maximum Number Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Plan
Beginning balance January 1, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
January 1, 2011 - January 31, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
February 1, 2011 - February 28, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
March 1, 2011 - March 31, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
April 1, 2011 – April 30, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
May 1, 2011 – May 31, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
June 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
Total		-

Note 11 - Subsequent Events

The Company has performed a review of events subsequent to the balance sheet dated June 30, 2011, through the report issuance date.

AMBASE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This quarterly report, together with other statements and information publicly disseminated by the Company,  may contain certain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), or make oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements. The Company intends such forward-looking statements to be covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements are inherently subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which cannot be predicted or quantified. The forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, anticipated market performance, anticipated litigation results or the timing of pending litigation, and similar matters. When used in this Quarterly Report, the words “estimates,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “plans,” “intends” and variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties.  The Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, include, but are not limited to those set forth in “Item 1A, Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report and in the Company’s other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including but not limited to: (i) transaction volume in the securities markets; (ii) the volatility of the securities markets; (iii) fluctuations in interest rates; (iv) risks inherent in the real estate business, including, but not limited to tenant defaults, changes in occupancy rates or real estate values; (v) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost of doing business; (vi) general economic conditions; (vii) changes in the rate of inflation and the related impact on the securities markets; (viii) changes in federal and state tax laws; and (ix) risks arising from unfavorable decisions in our current material litigation matters, or unfavorable decisions in other Supervisory Goodwill cases. These are not the only risks that we face. There may be additional risks that we do not presently know of or that we currently believe are immaterial which could also impair our business and financial position.

Undue reliance should not be placed on these forward-looking statements, which are applicable only as of the date hereof. The Company undertakes no obligation to revise or update these forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances that arise after the date of this quarterly report or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. Accordingly, there is no assurance that the Company’s expectations will be realized.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, which follows, should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and related notes, which are contained in Part I - Item 1, herein and the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Item 2.  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

BUSINESS OVERVIEW

AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) is a holding company which, through a wholly-owned subsidiary, owns a commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut. The Company previously owned an insurance company and a savings bank.

In February 1991, the Company sold its ownership interest in The Home Insurance Company and its subsidiaries. On December 4, 1992, Carteret Savings Bank, FA (“Carteret”) was placed in receivership by the Office of Thrift Supervision (“OTS”).

The Company’s assets currently consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, and real estate owned. The Company earns non-operating revenue consisting principally of investment earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents. The Company continues to evaluate a number of possible acquisitions and is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities, including the contingent assets associated with its legal claims, as described in Part I – Item 1. Discussions and negotiations are ongoing with respect to certain of these matters.  From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings.  The Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

The Company’s assets at June 30, 2011, aggregated $10,834,000, consisting principally of cash and cash equivalents of $893,000, investment securities of $7,700,000, and real estate owned of $1,945,000.  At June 30, 2011, the Company’s liabilitiesaggregated $144,000.  Total stockholders equity was $10,690,000.

For the six months ended June 30, 2011, cash of $956,000 was used by operations, due to the payment of operating expenses and prior year accruals.  The cash needs of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2011 were satisfied by the Company’s financial resources and to a lesser extent the receipt of investment earnings received on investment securities and cash equivalents. Management believes that the Company’s liquid assets are sufficient to continue operations for the next twelve months.

For the six months ended June 30, 2010, cash of $1,221,000 was used by operations, primarily due to the payment of legal expenses relating to the Supervisory Goodwill proceedings and to a lesser extent the payment of prior year accruals and operating expenses, partially offset by the receipt of interest income and investment earnings.  The cash needs of the Company for the six months ended June 30, 2010 were satisfied by the Company’s financial resources and to a lesser extent receipt of investment earnings received on investment securities and cash equivalents.

Real estate owned consists of one commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut which the Company owns and manages.  The building is approximately 14,500 square feet; approximately 3,500 square feet is utilized by the Company for its executive offices; the remaining space is currently unoccupied and available for lease.  Although the portion of the building not being utilized by the Company is currently unoccupied and available for lease, based on the Company’s analysis, including but not limited to current market rents in the area, leasing values, and comparable property sales, the Company believes the property’s fair value exceeds the property’s current carrying value.  Therefore, the Company believes the carrying value of the property as of June 30, 2011, has not been impaired.

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities as of June 30, 2011, decreased from December 31, 2010, principally as a result of the payment of prior year accruals.

There are no material commitments for capital expenditures as of June 30, 2011.  Inflation has had no material impact on the business and operations of the Company.

The Company continues to evaluate a number of possible acquisitions and is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities, including the contingent assets associated with its legal claims. Discussions and negotiations are ongoing with respect to certain of these matters. The Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements. For a discussion of lawsuits and proceedings, including the Supervisory Goodwill litigation see Part I - Item 1 - Note 3.

Results of Operations for the Second Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 vs. the Second Quarter and Six Months Ended June 30, 2010

The Company earns non-operating revenue consisting principally of investment earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents.  The Company’s management believes that operating cash needs for the next twelve months will be met principally by the Company’s financial resources and to a lesser extent, the receipt of investment earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents.

Compensation and benefits decreased to $336,000 and $668,000 in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, compared to $359,000 and $776,000 in the respective 2010 periods.  The decrease in the 2011 second quarter and six month periods is due to lower compensation expenses due to reduced staffing levels as well as a lower level of benefit costs in the 2011 periods versus the same 2010 periods.

No stock based compensation expense was recorded in the six months ended June 30, 2011 or June 30, 2010, as all previously granted outstanding options vested as of January 2, 2007.  No stock option awards have been granted since January 2005.

Professional and outside services decreased slightly to $84,000 and $137,000 in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $101,000 and $151,000 in the respective 2010 periods.  The decrease in the 2011 periods as compared to the 2010 periodsis principally the result of a lower level of legal and professional fees principally relating to the Supervisory Goodwill litigation.

Property operating and maintenance expenses were $21,000 and $50,000 for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared to $37,000 and $69,000 in the respective 2010 periods.  The decreased expenses in 2011 compared to the 2010 periods are due to a decrease in the overall level of repairs and maintenance expenses.

Insurance expenses decreased to $11,000 and $19,000 in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively compared with $17,000 and $24,000 in the respective 2010 periods.  The decrease is generally due to a decline in insurance premium costs due to cost containment efforts.

Other operating expenses decreased slightly to $20,000 and $47,000 in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, compared with $22,000 and $52,000 in the respective 2010 periods due to overall cost containment efforts.

Interest income in the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, decreased to $2,000 and $5,000, respectively from $4,000 and $9,000 in the respective 2010 periods.  The decreased interest income is principally due to a decreased investment yield in 2011, compared with 2010, and a lower level of cash equivalents and investment securities.  See Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure about Market Risk for information concerning the Company’s weighted average interest rate yield on investment securities as of  June 30, 2011.

Other income of $105,000 for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, is attributable to recovery of funds by the Company in May 2011, from items previously written off.

The Company recognized income tax provisions of $15,000 and $30,000 for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2011, respectively, as compared with income tax provisions of $11,000 and $22,000 for the second quarter and six months ended June 30, 2010, respectively.  The income tax provisions for the 2011 and 2010 periods are primarily attributable to a provision for a minimum tax on capital imposed by the state of Connecticut. Income taxes applicable to operating income (loss) are generally determined by applying the estimated effective annual income tax rates to pretax income (loss) for the year-to-date interim period.  Income taxes applicable to unusual or infrequently occurring items are provided in the period in which such items occur.

TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

(in thousands)	Payments Due by Period
	Total		Less Than One Year		One to Three Years		Three to Five Years		More than Five Years
Operating leases	$	15	$	3	$	12	$	-	$	-
Total	$	15	$	3	$	12	$	-	$	-

Item 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The Company holds short-term investments as a source of liquidity. The Company’s interest rate sensitive investments with maturity dates of less than one year consist of the following:

($ in thousands)	June 30, 2011							December 31, 2010
	Carrying Value				Fair Value			Carrying Value				Fair Value
U.S. Treasury Bills		$	7,700			$	7,700		$	8,200			$	8,199
Weighted average interest rate			0.60	%						0.09	%

The Company’s current policy is to minimize the interest rate risk of its short-term investments by investing in U.S. Treasury Bills with maturities of less than one year.  There were no significant changes in market exposures or the manner in which interest rate risk is managed during the year.

Due to current market factors, the Company has maintained its available cash resources in U.S. Treasury Bills, which are currently providing a low investment yield.

Item 4T. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our disclosure controls and procedures include our controls and other procedures to ensure that information required to be disclosed in this and other reports under the Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure and to ensure that such information is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods.

Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have conducted an evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of June 30, 2011.  Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act) are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by us in the reports we file under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported with adequate timeliness.

There have been no changes during the most recent fiscal quarter in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

STOCKHOLDER INQUIRIES

Stockholder inquiries, including requests for the following:  (i) change of address; (ii) replacement of lost stock certificates; (iii) Common Stock name registration changes; (iv) Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q; (v) Annual Reports on Form 10-K; (vi) proxy material; and (vii) information regarding stock holdings, should be directed to:

American Stock Transfer and Trust Company

59 Maiden Lane

New York, NY  10038

Attention:  Shareholder Services

(800) 937-5449 or (718) 921-8200 Ext. 6820

As the Company does not maintain a website, copies of Quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements can also be obtained directly from the Company free of charge by sending a request to the Company by mail as follows:

AmBase Corporation

100 Putnam Green, 3rd Floor

Greenwich, CT  06830

Attn:  Shareholder Services

The Company is subject to the informational requirements of the Exchange Act. Accordingly, the Company’s public reports, including Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Annual Reports on Form 10-K and Proxy Statements, can be obtained through the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) EDGAR Database available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov. Materials filed with the SEC may also be read or copied by visiting the SEC’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. Information on the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained by calling 1-800-SEC-0330.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.              LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a discussion of the Company’s legal proceedings, including a discussion of the Company’s Supervisory Goodwill litigation, see Part I - Item 1 - Note 3 - Legal Proceedings.

Item 1A.                   RISK FACTORS

There have been no material changes from risk factors previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010 in response to Item 1A to Part I of Form 10-K.

Item 2.              UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

None.

Item 3.              DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

Item 5.              OTHER INFORMATION

None.

Item 6.              EXHIBITS

Exhibit 31.1 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 31.2 Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer

Exhibit 32.1 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer

Exhibit 32.2 Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

AMBASE CORPORATION

          /s/                  John P. Ferrara

By       JOHN P. FERRARA

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Controller

(Duly Authorized Officer and Principal Financial and

Accounting Officer)

Date:  August 9, 2011

EX-31.1

Exhibit 31.1

CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

I, Richard A. Bianco, certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmBase Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ Richard A. Bianco

Date:  August 11, 2011                                                                Richard A. Bianco

Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

EX-31.2

Exhibit 31.2

CERTIFICATION OF THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER

PURSUANT TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY

ACT OF 2002

I, John P. Ferrara, certify that:

1.           I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of AmBase Corporation;

2. Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this report;

3. Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this report;

4. The registrant's other certifying officers and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have:

(a)   Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this quarterly report is being prepared;

(b) Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles;

(c) Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures, and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation; and

(d) Disclosed in this report any change in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the registrant's most recent fiscal quarter (the registrant’s fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrant's internal control over financial reporting; and

5. The registrant's other certifying officers and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent functions):

(a)   All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial information; and

(b)   Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal control over financial reporting.

Date:  August 11, 2011                                                                            /s/ John P. Ferrara

  John P. Ferrara

Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Controller

EX-32.1

Exhibit 32.1

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, Richard A. Bianco, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 11, 2011                                                         /s/ Richard A. Bianco

                                                                        Richard A. Bianco

                                                                        Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer

                                                                        AmBase Corporation

EX-32.2

Exhibit 32.2

CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO

18 U.S.C. SECTION 1350,

AS ADOPTED PURSUANT TO

SECTION 906 OF THTE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002

In connection with the quarterly report of AmBase Corporation (the “Company”) on Form 10-Q for the period ending June 30, 2011 as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the “Report”), I, John P. Ferrara, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, that to my knowledge:

(1) The Report fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934; and

(2) The information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the financial condition and result of operations of the Company.

Date:  August 11, 2011

/s/ John P. Ferrara

John P. Ferrara Vice President and

Chief Financial Officer

AmBase Corporation

XML



Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (Parenthetical) (USD $) In Thousands, except Share data	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Assets
Held to maturity investments, market value	$ 7,700	$ 8,199
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock, par value (in dollars per share)	$ 0.01	$ 0.01
Common stock, shares authorized (in shares)	200,000,000	200,000,000
Common stock, shares issued (in shares)	46,410,007	46,410,007
Common stock, shares outstanding (in shares)	43,075,410	43,075,410
Treasury stock, at cost (in shares)	3,334,597	3,334,597

XML



Consolidated Statements of Operations (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands, except Per Share data	3 Months Ended		6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Operating expenses:
Compensation and benefits	$ 336	$ 359	$ 668	$ 776
Professional and outside services	84	101	137	151
Property operating and maintenance	21	37	50	69
Depreciation	12	12	24	25
Insurance	11	17	19	24
Other operating	20	22	47	52
Total operating expenses	(484)	(548)	(945)	(1,097)
Operating loss	(484)	(548)	(945)	(1,097)
Interest income	2	4	5	9
Realized gains on sales of investment securities	9	9	15	19
Other income	105	0	105	0
Loss before income taxes	(368)	(535)	(820)	(1,069)
Income tax expense	(15)	(11)	(30)	(22)
Net loss	$ (383)	$ (546)	$ (850)	$ (1,091)
Per share data:
Net loss attributable to common stockholders - basic (in dollars per share)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.02)	$ (0.02)
Net loss attributable to common stockholders - assuming dilution (in dollars per share)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.01)	$ (0.02)	$ (0.02)
Weighted average common shares outstanding
Basic (in shares)	43,075	43,075	43,075	43,075
Assuming dilution (in shares)	43,075	43,075	43,075	43,075

XML



Document And Entity Information (USD $)	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Entity Registrant Name	AMBASE Corp
Entity Central Index Key	0000020639
Current Fiscal Year End Date	--12-31
Entity Well-known Seasoned Issuer	No
Entity Voluntary Filers	No
Entity Current Reporting Status	Yes
Entity Filer Category	Non-accelerated Filer
Entity Public Float		$ 6,000,000
Entity Common Stock, Shares Outstanding	43,075,410
Document Fiscal Year Focus	2011
Document Fiscal Period Focus	Q2
Document Type	10-Q
Amendment Flag	false
Document Period End Date	Jun. 30, 2011

XML



Income Taxes

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Income Taxes [Abstract]

Income Taxes

Note 7 - Income Taxes

The Company and its domestic subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return.  The Company recognizes both the current and deferred tax consequences of all transactions that have been recognized in the financial statements, calculated based on the provisions of enacted tax laws, including the tax rates in effect for current and future years.  Net deferred tax assets are recognized immediately when a more likely than not criterion is met; that is, greater than 50% probability exists that the tax benefits will actually be realized sometime in the future.

The Company has calculated a net deferred tax asset of $40 million as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, arising primarily from net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and alternative minimum tax (“AMT”) credits.  This amount does not include the anticipated tax effects of NOL’s which could be generated from the Company’s investment in Carteret Savings Bank, F.A. and subsidiaries (“Carteret”), resulting from the election decision, as more fully described below. A valuation allowance has been established for the entire net deferred tax asset as management, at the current time, has no basis to conclude that realization is more likely than not.

There were no unrecognized tax benefits at June 30, 2011 or December 31, 2010. Further, no significant changes in unrecognized income tax benefits are currently expected to occur over the next year.  Interest and/or penalties related to underpayments of income taxes, if applicable, would be included in interest expense and operating expenses, respectively. The accompanying financial statements do not include any amounts for any such interest and/or penalties.  The Company’s federal income tax returns for the years subsequent to 1992 have not been reviewed by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) or state authorities.  In October 2009, the Company received notification from the IRS that they would be reviewing the Company’s 2007 federal income tax return.  In connection with the IRS audit, in April 2010, the IRS issued the Company a Notice of Proposed Adjustment for tax year 2007, proposing to disallow approximately $16.6 million of deductions previously recognized by the Company on its 2007 Federal income tax return (the “IRS Proposed Adjustment”).  The IRS Proposed Adjustment seeks to disallow the Company’s tax deduction for the payment made by the Company in 2007 in satisfaction of its Supplemental Retirement Plan obligation.  This matter is currently ongoing.  The Company has not been notified of any potential tax audits by any state or local tax authorities.  As such, the Company believes the statute of limitations for federal and state purposes are generally closed for tax years prior to 2007.

Based upon the Company’s federal income tax returns as filed through 2009 (subject to IRS audit adjustments), excluding all effects of the inclusion of Carteret/Carteret FSB from December 4, 1992 forward, as further discussed herein, the Company has NOL carryforwards available to reduce future federal taxable income which expire if unused in the tax years as indicated below.  The amounts as of June 30, 2011, are as follows:

Tax Year Expiring	Amount
2012	$	1,100,000
2018		5,400,000
2019		4,000,000
2020		2,600,000
2021		4,000,000
2022		3,200,000
2023		1,800,000
2024		700,000
2026		2,800,000
2027		3,100,000
2028		4,600,000
2029		2,400,000
Total	$	35,700,000

In addition to the NOL carryforwards noted herein, the Company currently estimates that, an additional $16.7 million of NOL carryforwards could be generated from the 2007 tax year which would expire if unused in the 2027 tax year, however, as discussed above, in connection with the IRS’s 2007 Federal income tax return audit, the IRS is proposing to disallow approximately $16.6 million of the NOL carry forwards generated from the 2007 tax year; this matter is ongoing.  Additionally, approximately $2.0 million of NOL carryforwards could be generated from the 2010 tax year which would expire if unused in the 2030 tax year. In the 2010 tax year, approximately $5.3 million of NOL carryforwards originating from the 1995 tax year expired to the extent they remain unused and in the 2009 tax year, approximately $2.2 million of NOL carryforwards originating from the 1994 tax year expired to the extent they remain unused.  The unused carryforwards will have expired unless they are utilized in prior tax years or absorbed in an earlier year based on inclusion of certain items in the consolidated group.  The utilization of certain carryforwards and carrybacks is subject to limitations under U.S. federal income tax laws.  In addition, the Company has approximately $21 million of AMT credit carryforwards (“AMT Credits”), which are not subject to expiration.  Based on the filing of the Carryback Claims, as defined further above, the Company would seek to utilize approximately $8 million of the $21 million of AMT Credits.

As a result of the Office of Thrift Supervision’s December 4, 1992 placement of Carteret in receivership, under the management of the Resolution Trust Corporation (“RTC”)/Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”), and then proposed Treasury Reg. §1.597-4(g), the Company had previously filed its 1992 and subsequent federal income tax returns with Carteret disaffiliated from the Company’s consolidated federal income tax return. Based upon the impact of Treasury Reg. §1.597-4(g), which was issued in final form on December 20, 1995, a continuing review of the Company’s tax basis in Carteret, and the impact of prior year tax return adjustments on the Company’s 1992 federal income tax return as filed, the Company decided not to make an election pursuant to final Treasury Reg. §1.597-4(g) to disaffiliate Carteret from the Company’s consolidated federal income tax return effective as of December 4, 1992 (the “Election Decision”).

The Company has made numerous requests to the RTC/FDIC for tax information pertaining to Carteret and the resulting successor institution, Carteret Federal Savings Bank (“Carteret FSB”); however all of the information still has not been received. The Company believes, as a result of remaining consolidated with Carteret FSB for federal income tax return purposes, that the Company’s tax basis in its investment in Carteret/Carteret FSB can be converted into NOL’s, as tax losses are incurred,  which could be available to carryforward/carryback into various federal income tax return years. However; since all of the Carteret FSB tax information has not been received, the Company is unable to determine with certainty, the amount of or the years in which any NOL’s may ultimately be generated; if the NOL carryforwards/carrybacks will be utilized in prior federal income tax return years; or the final expiration dates of any of the NOL carryforwards/carrybacks ultimately generated.

Based on information received to date, and prior to the recognition of the 1992 tax losses reflected on the Company’s 1992 amended federal income tax return, as further described below, the Company estimated that as of December 1992 it had a remaining tax basis related to its investment in Carteret/Carteret FSB of approximately $158 million. Based on the Company’s Election Decision, described above, and the receipt of some of the requested information from the RTC/FDIC, the Company amended its 1992 consolidated federal income tax return to include the federal income tax effects of Carteret and Carteret FSB, (the “1992 Amended Return”). The Company is still in the process of reviewing its consolidated federal income tax returns for 1993 and subsequent years.

The Company expects that the 1992 Amended Return will generate approximately $56 million of NOL’s for tax year 1992, which the Company is seeking to carryback to prior tax years to produce refunds of tax previously paid. The 1992 Amended Return has not yet been accepted by the IRS. See “Carryback Claims,” below for further information. As part of the 1992 Amended Return, approximately $56 million, (of the $158 million), of Carteret/Carteret FSB tax basis is expected to be converted into NOL’s, (as tax losses are incurred) in tax year 1992, and will have expired in the 2007 tax year, unless they are utilized as part of the “Carryback Claims,” or absorbed in earlier years based on inclusion of certain items in the consolidated group.

The Carteret/Carteret FSB tax basis, of approximately $102 million, remaining after recognition of the 1992 Amended Return, may be converted into NOL carryforwards/carrybacks as additional tax losses are incurred by Carteret/Carteret FSB and may be carried back or carried forward to other tax years; may be utilized in other tax years; or could begin to expire no earlier than the 2008 tax year based upon the year any NOL’s are ultimately generated. The Company can give no assurances with regard to the 1992 Amended Return, subsequent year returns, or the final amount or expiration of NOL carryforwards/carrybacks ultimately generated, if any, from the Company’s tax basis in Carteret/Carteret FSB. Any NOL’s ultimately generated from the Company’s tax basis in Carteret/Carteret FSB, would be in addition to the NOL carryforwards/carrybacks generated based on the Company’s federal income tax returns as previously filed, as further detailed above.

In March 2000, the Company filed with the IRS several claims and amendments to previously filed claims with respect to the Carryback Claims, seeking refunds from the IRS of alternative minimum tax and other federal income taxes paid by the Company in prior years, plus applicable IRS interest, based on the filing of the 1992 Amended Return.  In February 2005, the IRS formally disallowed the Carryback Claims.  On April 29, 2008, the Company filed suit with respect to the Carryback Claims in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, seeking federal tax refunds for tax year 1989, plus interest.  On September 29, 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), representing defendant United States in the suit, filed a Motion to Dismiss.  In response, on October 19, 2009, the Company filed its opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss, as well as the Company’s own Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.  In June 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision conditionally granting the United States’ Motion to Dismiss the case but allowing the Company to conduct limited discovery to establish whether the Court has jurisdiction.  On August 30, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to Set Aside the Court’s Conditional Order of Dismissal.  On February 28, 2011, the Court granted the Company’s motion and issued a Memorandum of Decision concluding that the Company had timely filed a refund claim for tax year 1992 seeking to adjust the amount of bad debt deduction and that the case should not be dismissed.  In March 2011, the Company filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment based on the Court’s ruling that the Company’s refund claims were timely filed.  In May 2011, the DOJ filed a Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and an opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion.  In June 2011, the Company filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and a Reply to the Governments Opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion, and the Government in June 2011, subsequently filed a response brief. The Court’s rulings to date are not dispositive of the case. The Company can give no assurances as to the final amount of refunds, if any, or when they might be received.  See Note 3 – Legal Proceedings for further information.

The FDIC has previously filed a federal income tax return for Carteret FSB for 1995 (as well as other years),  which indicates that Carteret FSB allegedly could owe a 1995 federal income tax liability of $32 million, which including interest and penalty thereon, is alleged to be in excess of $120 million. The FDIC has stated to the United States Court of Federal Claims (“Court of Claims”) that the tax amounts are only estimates and are highly contingent.  However, it is possible that the IRS may try to collect the alleged Carteret FSB federal income taxes from the Carteret FSB receivership.

The Company believes the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns filed by the FDIC were improperly filed and are neither accurate nor valid.  The FDIC, as indicated above, continues to report the 1995 federal income tax liability, including interest and penalty, as a component of the alleged Carteret FSB receivership deficit. As part of the Supervisory Goodwill legal proceedings, the Company presented to the Court of Claims various arguments to support the position that no federal income tax would be owed as a result of the Carteret FSB receivership operations for tax year 1995; however, the Department of Justice and the FDIC have stated to the Court of Claims that they do not believe the Court of Claims has jurisdiction over that issue. The Supervisory Goodwill proceedings remain pending in the Court of Claims. Based on the information received to date, if the correct Carteret FSB federal income tax results were included with the Company’s originally filed federal income tax returns, the Company based upon consultation with its legal and tax advisors believes that no additional material federal income tax would be owed by the Company, although this cannot be assured because a contrary result is possible, given the uncertainty with various legal and factual assumptions underlying the Company’s beliefs. This assessment included among other items, a review of the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns as prepared by the FDIC and the correction of errors originally reported therein, the proper application of federal NOL carryforwards and carrybacks, and the adherence to statute of limitation provisions contained in the Internal Revenue Code, as amended.

As explained above, although the Company does not believe that Carteret FSB or the Company will have a material federal income tax liability related to Carteret FSB for tax year 1995 (or any other tax year), the Company can give no assurances of the final amounts, if any, of federal income taxes owed by the Carteret FSB receivership or by the Company as a result of the Carteret FSB receivership operations. The Company is continuing to try to resolve these matters as part of the Supervisory Goodwill legal process and is also continuing to review the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns and the results of their inclusion with the Company’s federal income tax returns as previously filed. The Company is pursuing the Carryback Claims, as further described above, which could have an impact on the analysis of the prior year tax information. For further information on the Supervisory Goodwill legal proceedings, see Note 3 herein. The discussion of the Carteret FSB federal income tax results is intended to provide details as to the potential inter-relationship of the Carteret FSB federal income tax returns with the Company’s federal income tax positions. It is not a reflection of any federal income tax liability of the Company arising from the Carteret receivership operations.

XML



Legal Proceedings

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Legal Proceedings [Abstract]

Legal Proceedings

Note 3 - Legal Proceedings

The information contained inItem 8 - Note 10 in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010, is incorporated by reference herein and the defined terms set forth below have the same meaning ascribed to them in that report.  There have been no material developments in such legal proceedings, except as set forth below.

The Company is or has been a party in a number of lawsuits or proceedings, including the following:

Supervisory Goodwill Litigation - On February 12 and 17, 2009, the Court heard closing arguments.  At the conclusion of closing arguments, the Court ruled that the FDIC and DOJ could file short supplemental briefs addressing certain limited issues by March 6, 2009, and that the Company could file a short responsive brief which was filed on March 25, 2009.  In May 2009, the DOJ requested and simultaneously filed with the Court an additional supplemental brief.  The Court granted the DOJ’s motion and permitted the DOJ’s additional supplemental brief.  The Company subsequently requested and the Court allowed the Company to file a responsive supplemental brief to the DOJ brief which was filed in June 2009.  The Company does not know when the Court will issue its final decision.  The Company believes any decision rendered by Judge Smith on damages, as well as his decision relating to his authority to review and consider the validity of the alleged receivership deficit, will likely be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Both the Court of Federal Claims and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit have issued numerous decisions in cases that involve claims against the United States based upon its breach of its contracts with savings and loan institutions through its 1989 enactment of FIRREA. In particular, the Federal Circuit has issued decisions rejecting Takings Clause claims advanced by shareholders of failed thrifts. Examples of such decisions include Castle v. United States, 301 F.3d 1328 (Fed. Cir. 2002) and Bailey v. United States, 341 F. 3d 1342 (Fed. Cir 2003). In June 2004, the United States Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari filed by Bailey.  The Court of Federal Claims decisions and certain filings in the Company’s case, as well as other decisions in Winstar related cases, are publicly available on the Court of Federal Claims web site at www.uscfc.uscourts.gov.  In addition, decisions in Winstar-related cases that have been issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals, the court that hears appeals from decisions by the Court of Federal Claims, may be found on that court’s website at www.cafc.uscourts.gov. Decisions in other Winstar related cases may be relevant to the Company’s Supervisory Goodwill claims, but are not necessarily indicative of the ultimate outcome of the Company’s actions. The Company can give no assurances regarding the ultimate outcome of the Supervisory Goodwill Litigation.

Federal income tax refund suit on Carryback Claims.  In March 2000, the Company filed with the IRS several claims and amendments to previously filed claims with respect to the Carryback Claims, seeking refunds from the IRS of alternative minimum tax and other federal income taxes paid by the Company in prior years, plus applicable IRS interest, based on the filing of the 1992 Amended Return.  In February 2005, the IRS formally disallowed the Carryback Claims.  On April 29, 2008, the Company filed suit with respect to the Carryback Claims in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut, seeking federal tax refunds for tax year 1989, plus interest.  On September 29, 2009, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”), representing defendant United States in the suit, filed a Motion to Dismiss.  In response, on October 19, 2009, the Company filed its opposition to the Government’s Motion to Dismiss, as well as the Company’s own Motion for Partial Summary Judgment.  In June 2010, the Court issued a Memorandum Decision conditionally granting the United States’ Motion to Dismiss the case but allowing the Company to conduct limited discovery to establish whether the Court has jurisdiction.  On August 30, 2010, the Company filed a Motion to Set Aside the Court’s Conditional Order of Dismissal.  On February 28, 2011, the Court granted the Company’s motion and issued a Memorandum of Decision concluding that the Company had timely filed a refund claim for tax year 1992 seeking to adjust the amount of bad debt deduction and that the case should not be dismissed.  In March 2011, the Company filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment based on the Court’s ruling that the Company’s refund claims were timely filed.  In May 2011, the DOJ filed a Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and an opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion.  In June 2011, the Company filed a Memorandum in Opposition to the Government’s Cross Motion for Summary Judgment and a Reply to the Governments Opposition to the Company’s Summary Judgment Motion, and the Government in June 2011, subsequently filed a response brief. The Court’s rulings to date are not dispositive of the case.  The Company can give no assurances as to the final amount of refunds, if any, or when they might be received.  See Note 8 – Income Taxes for further information.

XML



Pension and Savings Plans

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Pension and Savings Plans [Abstract]

Pension and Savings Plans

Note 9 - Pension and Savings Plans

The Company sponsors the AmBase 401(k) Savings Plan (the “Savings Plan”), which is a “Section 401(k) Plan” within the meaning of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).  The Savings Plan permits eligible employees to make contributions of up to 30% of compensation, which are matched by the Company at a percentage determined annually.  Effective July 1, 2010, the employer match was reduced to 33% of the amount the employee elects to defer. Employee contributions to the Savings Plan are invested at the employee’s discretion, in various investment funds.  The Company’s matching contributions are invested in the same manner as the compensation reduction contributions.  All contributions are subject to maximum limitations contained in the Code.  The Company’s matching contributions to the Savings Plan, charged to expense, were as follows

	June 30, 2011				Six Months Ended June 30
	2011		2010		2011		2010
Company matching contributions	$	4,000	$	6,000	$	16,000	$	41,000

XML



Common Stock Repurchase Plan

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Common Stock Repurchase Plan [Abstract]

Common Stock Repurchase Plan

Note 10 - Common Stock Repurchase Plan

In January 2002, the Company announced a common stock repurchase plan (the “Repurchase Plan”) which allows for the repurchase by the Company of up to 10 million shares of its common stock in the open market.

The Repurchase Plan is conditioned upon favorable business conditions and acceptable prices for the common stock. Purchases under the Repurchase Plan may be made, from time to time, in the open market, through block trades or otherwise. Depending on market conditions and other factors, purchases may be commenced or suspended any time or from time to time without prior notice.

	Total Number of Shares Purchased		Average Price Paid per Share (including Broker Commissions)		Total Number Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans		Maximum Number Shares that may yet be Purchased under the Plan
Beginning balance January 1, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
January 1, 2011 - January 31, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
February 1, 2011 - February 28, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
March 1, 2011 - March 31, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
April 1, 2011 – April 30, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
May 1, 2011 – May 31, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
June 1, 2011 – June 30, 2011		-		-		3,208,109	6,791,891
Total		-

XML



Stock-Based Compensation

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Stock-Based Compensation [Abstract]

Stock-Based Compensation

Note 8 – Stock-Based Compensation

Under the Company’s 1993 Stock Incentive Plan (the “1993 Plan”), the Company may grant to officers and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries, stock options (“Options”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock awards (“Restricted Stock”), merit awards (“Merit Awards”) and performance share awards (“Performance Shares”), through May 28, 2018. An aggregate of 5,000,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock are reserved for issuance under the 1993 Plan (upon the exercise of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, upon awards of Restricted Stock and Performance Shares); however, of such shares, only 2,500,000 shares in the aggregate shall be available for issuance for Restricted Stock Awards and Merit Awards. Such shares shall be authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock.  Options may be granted as incentive stock options (“ISOs”) intended to qualify for favorable tax treatment under Federal tax law or as nonqualified stock options (“NQSOs”). SARs may be granted with respect to any Options granted under the 1993 Plan and may be exercised only when the underlying Option is exercisable. The 1993 Plan requires that the exercise price of all Options and SARs be equal to or greater than the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock on the date of grant of that Option. The term of any ISO or related SAR cannot exceed ten years from the date of grant, and the term of any NQSO cannot exceed ten years and one month from the date of grant. Subject to the terms of the 1993 Plan and any additional restrictions imposed at the time of grant, Options and any related SARs ordinarily will become exercisable commencing one year after the date of grant. Options granted generally have a ten year contractual life and generally have vesting terms of two years from the date of grant. In the case of a “Change of Control” of the Company (as defined in the 1993 Plan), Options granted pursuant to the 1993 Plan may become fully exercisable as to all optioned shares from and after the date of such Change of Control in the discretion of the Committee or as may otherwise be provided in the grantee’s Option agreement. Death, retirement, or absence for disability will not result in the cancellation of any Options.

The fair values of option awards were estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes-Merton option valuation model (“Black-Scholes”) that uses certain assumptions at the time of valuation. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s stock. The Company uses historical data to estimate option exercises and employee terminations within the valuation model. The expected term of options granted is estimated based on the contractual lives of option grants, option vesting period and historical data and represents the period of time that options granted are expected to be outstanding. The risk-free interest rate for periods within the contractual life of the option is based on the U.S. Treasury bond yield in effect at the time of grant.

The Black-Scholes option valuation model requires the input of highly subjective assumptions, including the expected life of the stock-based award and stock price volatility. The assumptions utilized were management’s best estimates, but these estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. As a result, if other assumptions had been used, our recorded stock-based compensation expense could have been materially different from the amounts previously recorded. In addition, the Company is required to estimate the expected forfeiture rate and only recognize expense for those shares expected to vest. If our actual forfeiture rate is materially different from our estimate, the share-based compensation expense could be materially different.  The Company believes that the use of the Black-Scholes model meets the fair value measurement objectives of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and reflects all substantive characteristics of the instruments being valued.

Incentive plan activity during the year-to-date period is summarized as follows:

	Number of Shares Under Option		Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in years)	Intrinsic Value
Outstanding at January 1, 2011	836,000		$	0.87
Expired	(20,000	)		0.60
Outstanding at June 30, 2011	816,000		$	0.87	1.99	$	-
Exercisable at June 30, 2011	816,000		$	0.87	1.99	$	-

Information relating to the 1993 Plan as of the dates indicated below is as follows:

	June 30, 2011		June 30, 2010
Unamortized compensation cost relating to non-vested stock   options	$	-	$	-
Stock based compensation expense recorded for the year-to-date   period	$	-	$	-
Options to purchase shares of common stock which were excluded from computation of diluted earnings per share due to the effect of being anti-dilutive in the computation of earnings per share.		816,000		836,000
Shares available for future stock option grants		4,184,000

XML



Organization

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Organization [Abstract]

Organization

Note 1 - Organization

The accompanying consolidated financial statements of AmBase Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (the “Company”) are unaudited and subject to year-end adjustments. All material intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated. In the opinion of management, the interim financial statements reflect all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments unless otherwise disclosed, necessary for a fair presentation of the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Results for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions, that it deems reasonable, that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from such estimates and assumptions. The unaudited interim financial statements presented herein are condensed and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements filed in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.

The Company’s assets currently consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, investment securities, and real estate.  The Company currently earns non-operating revenue principally consisting of earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents.  The Company continues to evaluate a number of possible acquisitions, and is engaged in the management of its assets and liabilities, including the contingent assets, as described in Part II - Item 1.  From time to time, the Company and its subsidiaries may be named as a defendant in various lawsuits or proceedings.  The Company intends to aggressively contest all litigation and contingencies, as well as pursue all sources for contributions to settlements.

The Company’s management believes that operating cash needs for the next twelve months will be met principally by the Company’s current financial resources and to a lesser extent the receipt of earnings on investment securities and cash equivalents.

XML



Cash and Cash Equivalents

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Cash and Cash Equivalents [Abstract]

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Note 4 - Cash and Cash Equivalents

Highly liquid investments, consisting principally of funds held in short-term money market accounts with original maturities of less than three months, are classified as cash equivalents.

XML



Investment Securities

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Investment Securities [Abstract]

Investment Securities

Note 5 - Investment Securities

Investment securities - held to maturity, consist of U.S. Treasury Bills with original maturities of three months or more and are carried at amortized cost (which includes accrued interest), based upon the Company’s intent and ability to hold these investments to maturity.

Investment securities consist of the following:

	June 30, 2011						December 31, 2010
(in thousands)	Carrying Value		Cost or Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Carrying Value		Cost or Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Held to Maturity:
U.S. Treasury Bills	$	7,700	$	7,700	$	7,700	$	8,200	$	8,200	$	8,199

The gross unrealized gains (losses) on investment securities consist of the following:

(in thousands)

Held to Maturity:	June 30, 2011		December 31, 2010
Gross unrealized gains (losses)	$	-	$	(1	)

Realized gains on the sales of investment securities available for sale follow:

(in thousands)

($ in thousands)	Second Quarter Ending June 30								Year-to-Date June 30
	2011				2010				2011				2010
Net sale proceeds		$	435			$	440			$	552			$	649
Cost basis			(426	)			(431	)			(537	)			(630	)
Realized gains		$	9			$	9			$	15			$	19

XML



Property Owned

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Property Owned [Abstract]

Property Owned

Note 6 – Property Owned

The Company owns one commercial office building in Greenwich, Connecticut that contains approximately 14,500 square feet.  The Company utilizes approximately 3,500 square feet for its executive offices; the remaining space is currently unoccupied and available for lease.  Depreciation expense for the building is calculated on a straight-line basis over 39 years. Tenant improvements, if any, would be depreciated over the lesser of the remaining life of the tenants’ lease or the estimated useful lives of the improvements.

Although the portion of the building not being utilized by the Company is currently unoccupied and available for lease, based on the Company’s analysis, the Company believes the property’s fair value exceeds the property’s current carrying value.  The Company’s impairment analysis includes a comprehensive range of factors including but not limited to:  the location of the property; property condition; current market conditions; comparable sales; current market rents in the area; new building zoning restrictions; raw land values; new building construction costs; building operating costs; leasing values; and cap rates for comparable buildings in the area.  Varying degrees of weight are given each factor.  Based on the Company’s analysis these factors taken together and/or considered individually form the basis for the Company’s analysis that no impairment condition exists.

The Company performs impairment tests if events or circumstances indicate that the property’s carrying value would not be recoverable.  As noted above, based on the Company’s analysis the Company believes the carrying value of the property as of June 30, 2011, has not been impaired and; therefore, the carrying value of the asset is fully recoverable by the Company.

XML



Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands	6 Months Ended
	Jun. 30, 2011	Jun. 30, 2010
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss	$ (850)	$ (1,091)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization	24	25
Realized gains on sales of investment securities	(15)	(19)
Changes in other assets and liabilities:
Accrued interest receivable on investment securities	0	8
Other assets	(37)	35
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	(82)	(174)
Other liabilities	4	(5)
Net cash used by operating activities	(956)	(1,221)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Maturities of investment securities - held to maturity	16,096	19,384
Purchases of investment securities - held to maturity	(15,596)	(18,394)
Sales of investment securities	552	649
Purchases of investments securities	(537)	(630)
Investment in real estate limited partnership	0	(300)
Net cash provided by investing activities	515	709
Net change in cash and cash equivalents	(441)	(512)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year	1,334	1,715
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	893	1,203
Supplemental cash flow disclosure:
Income taxes paid	$ 41	$ 65

XML



Recent Accounting Pronouncements

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Recent Accounting Pronouncements [Abstract]

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Note 2 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

There are no new accounting pronouncements that would materially affect the Company’s financial statements.

XML



Subsequent Events

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Subsequent Events [Abstract]

Subsequent Events

Note 11 - Subsequent Events

The Company has performed a review of events subsequent to the balance sheet dated June 30, 2011, through the report issuance date.

XML



Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited) (USD $) In Thousands	Jun. 30, 2011	Dec. 31, 2010
Consolidated Balance Sheets Parenthetical [Abstract]
Cash and cash equivalents	$ 893	$ 1,334
Held to maturity investments (market value $7,700 and $8,199, respectively)	7,700	8,200
Real estate owned:
Land	554	554
Buildings	1,900	1,900
Real estate owned, gross	2,454	2,454
Accumulated depreciation	(509)	(485)
Real estate owned, net	1,945	1,969
Other assets	296	259
Total assets	10,834	11,762
Liabilities:
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities	138	220
Other liabilities	6	2
Total liabilities	144	222
Commitments and contingencies (Note 3)
Stockholders' equity:
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 200,000,000 authorized, 46,410,007 issued and 43,075,410 outstanding in 2011 and 2010)	464	464
Additional paid-in capital	548,044	548,044
Accumulated deficit	(535,709)	(534,859)
Treasury stock, at cost - 3,334,597 shares	(2,109)	(2,109)
Total stockholders' equity	10,690	11,540
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity	$ 10,834	$ 11,762