Fair Value of Financial Instruments

12 Months Ended

Mar. 31, 2013

Fair Value of Financial Instruments [Abstract]

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

(12) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

The Company uses certain derivative financial instruments as part of its risk management strategy to reduce foreign currency risk. The Company recorded all derivatives on the consolidated balance sheet at fair value based on quotes obtained from financial institutions as of March 31, 2013. There were no foreign currency contracts outstanding as of March 31, 2012.

The Company maintains a Nonqualified Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan for highly compensated employees and invests assets to mirror the obligations under this Plan. The invested funds are maintained at a third party financial institution in the name of CSS and are invested in publicly traded mutual funds. The Company maintains separate accounts for each participant to reflect deferred contribution amounts and the related gains or losses on such deferred amounts. The investments are included in other current assets and the related liability is recorded as deferred compensation and included in long-term obligations in the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of the investments is based on the market price of the mutual funds as of March 31, 2013 and 2012.

The Company maintains two life insurance policies in connection with deferred compensation arrangements with two former executives. The cash surrender value of the policies is recorded in other long-term assets in the consolidated balance sheets and is based on quotes obtained from the insurance company as of March 31, 2013 and 2012.

To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, the FASB established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure the financial assets and liabilities fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the categorization is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the instrument.

The Company’s recurring assets and liabilities recorded on the consolidated balance sheet are categorized based on the inputs to the valuation techniques as follows:

Level 1 – Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the Company has the ability to access.

Level 2 – Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active or model inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Examples of Level 2 inputs included quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in non-active markets and pricing models whose inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.

Level 3 – Financial assets and liabilities whose values are based on prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

The following table presents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for those financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis in its consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2013 and 2012.

	March 31, 2013		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Marketable securities	$	678	$	678	$	0	$	0
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies		1,040		0		1,040		0
Total assets	$	1,718	$	678	$	1,040	$	0
Liabilities:
Deferred compensation plans	$	678	$	678	$	0	$	0
Foreign exchange contract		17		0		17		0
Total liabilities	$	695	$	678	$	17	$	0

	March 31, 2012		Quoted Prices In Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
	(in thousands)
Assets:
Marketable securities	$	680	$	680	$	0	$	0
Cash surrender value of life insurance policies		917		0		917		0
Total assets	$	1,597	$	680	$	917	$	0
Liabilities:
Deferred compensation plans	$	680	$	680	$	0	$	0
Total liabilities	$	680	$	680	$	0	$	0

Cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued expenses are reflected at carrying value in the consolidated balance sheets as such amounts are a reasonable estimate of their fair values due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements

The Company’s nonfinancial assets which are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis include property, plant and equipment, goodwill, intangible assets and certain other assets. These assets are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis; however, they are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances, such as when there is evidence that impairment may exist. In making the assessment of impairment, recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the asset group to future net cash flows estimated by the Company to be generated by such assets. If such asset group is considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds the fair value of the asset group. Assets to be disposed of are recorded at the lower of their carrying value or estimated net realizable value.

Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles are subject to impairment testing on an annual basis, or sooner if circumstances indicate a condition of impairment may exist. The valuations use assumptions such as interest and discount rates, growth projections and other assumptions of future business conditions. These valuation methods require a significant degree of management judgment concerning the use of internal and external data. In the event these methods indicate that fair value is less than the carrying value, the asset is recorded at fair value as determined by the valuation models. Accordingly, these fair value measurements fall in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

In connection with the sale of the Halloween portion of Paper Magic’s business on September 5, 2012, a portion of the goodwill associated with the Paper Magic reporting unit was allocated to the business being sold. Such allocation was made on the basis of the fair value of the assets being sold relative to the overall fair value of the Paper Magic reporting unit. This resulted in the Company recording a reduction of goodwill in the amount of $2,711,000 for the Paper Magic reporting unit. As the sale of the Halloween portion of Paper Magic’s business was a triggering event, the Company performed an interim impairment test on the goodwill remaining in the Paper Magic reporting unit after the reduction in goodwill associated with the sale of the Halloween portion of Paper Magic’s business was recorded. The Company determined that no impairment existed for the remainder of the goodwill of the Paper Magic reporting unit. There were no other indications or circumstances indicating that an impairment might exist in regard to the Company’s other nonfinancial assets which are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis as of March 31, 2013 and 2012.