XML 101 R26.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Commitments And Contingencies
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2013
Commitments And Contingencies [Abstract]  
Commitments And Contingencies

(19) Commitments and Contingencies:  

We anticipate total capital expenditures for our current business operations of approximately $575 million to $625 million for 2014, excluding the expenditure of funds previously received from the Connect America Fund program. Although we from time to time make short-term purchasing commitments to vendors with respect to these expenditures, we generally do not enter into firm, written contracts for such activities. 

 

In connection with the pending AT&T Transaction, the Company currently expects to incur operating expenses and capital expenditures of approximately $225 million to $275 million in 2014 related to these acquisition and integration initiatives.  The Company incurred $9.7  million of acquisition costs related to the AT&T Transaction during the fourth quarter of 2013.

 

In connection with the 2010 Transaction, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) and certain state regulatory commissions, in connection with granting their approvals of the 2010 Transaction, specified certain capital expenditure and operating requirements for the Acquired Territories for specified periods of time post-closing.  These requirements focus primarily on certain capital investment commitments to expand broadband availability to at least 85% of the households throughout the Acquired Territories with minimum download speeds of 3 megabits per second (Mbps) by the end of 2013We are required to provide download speeds of 4 Mbps to at least 75%,  80% and 85% of the households throughout the Acquired Territories by the end of 2013, 2014 and 2015, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, we had expanded broadband availability in excess of 3 Mbps to 85.4% of the households throughout the Acquired Territories, and in excess of 4 Mbps to 83.5% of the households throughout the Acquired Territories. Accordingly, we have met our FCC requirement to provide 3 Mbps coverage to 85% of the households and 4 Mbps coverage to 75% of the households in the Acquired Territories by the end of 2013. We have also met our FCC requirement to provide 4 Mbps coverage to 80% of the households in the Acquired Territories by the end of 2014.

 

To satisfy all or part of certain capital investment commitments to three state regulatory commissions, we placed an aggregate amount of $115.0 million in cash into escrow accounts and obtained a letter of credit for $190 million in 2010. Another $72.4 million of cash in an escrow account was acquired in connection with the 2010 Transaction to be used for service quality initiatives in the state of West Virginia.  As of December 31, 2013,  $176.3 million had been released from the escrow accounts and the Company had a restricted cash balance in the remaining escrow account in the aggregate amount of $11.4 million, including interest earned.  The aggregate amount of the escrow account will continue to decrease over time as Frontier makes the required capital expenditures in West Virginia. In September 2013, the letter of credit for the remaining $20 million expired. 

 

We are party to various legal proceedings (including individual, class and putative class actions) arising in the normal course of our business covering a wide range of matters and types of claims including, but not limited to, general contracts, billing disputes, rights of access, taxes and surcharges, consumer protection, trademark and patent infringement, employment, regulatory, tort, claims of competitors and disputes with other carriers. 

 

We accrue an expense for pending litigation when we determine that an unfavorable outcome is probable and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated.  Legal defense costs are expensed as incurred.  None of our existing accruals, after considering insurance coverage, for pending matters is material.  We constantly monitor our pending litigation for the purpose of adjusting our accruals and revising our disclosures accordingly, when required.  Litigation is, however, subject to uncertainty, and the outcome of any particular matter is not predictable.  We will vigorously defend our interests for pending litigation, and as of this date, we believe that the ultimate resolution of all such matters, after considering insurance coverage or other indemnities to which we are entitled, will not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations, or our cash flows. 

 

We conduct certain of our operations in leased premises and also lease certain equipment and other assets pursuant to operating leases. The lease arrangements have terms ranging from 1 to 99 years and several contain rent escalation clauses providing for increases in monthly rent at specific intervals. When rent escalation clauses exist, we record annual rental expense based on the total expected rent payments on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Certain leases also have renewal options. Renewal options that are reasonably assured are included in determining the lease term.

 

Future minimum rental commitments for all long-term noncancelable operating leases as of December 31, 2013 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

Operating Leases

    

 

 

 

Year ending December 31:

 

 

 

2014

 

$

61,880 

2015

 

 

10,452 

2016

 

 

8,804 

2017

 

 

7,708 

2018

 

 

7,393 

Thereafter

 

 

49,091 

Total minimum lease payments

 

$

145,328 

 

 

 

 

Total rental expense included in our consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 was $84.4 million, $79.3 million and $70.2 million, respectively.

 

In our normal course of business, we have obligations under certain non-cancelable arrangements for services.  During 2012, we entered into a “take or pay” arrangement for the purchase of future long distance and carrier services. Our remaining commitments under the arrangement are $145.5 million and $140.8 million for the years ending December 31, 2014 and 2015, respectively.  As of December 31, 2013, we expect to utilize the services included within the arrangement and no liability for the “take or pay” provision has been recorded.

 

We are party to contracts with several unrelated long distance carriers. The contracts provide fees based on traffic they carry for us subject to minimum monthly fees.

At December 31, 2013, the estimated future payments for obligations under our noncancelable long distance contracts and service agreements are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

Amount

    

 

 

 

Year ending December 31:

 

 

 

2014

 

$

28,653 

2015

 

 

20,796 

2016

 

 

9,694 

2017

 

 

4,295 

2018

 

 

1,204 

Thereafter

 

 

6,000 

Total

 

$

70,642 

 

 

 

 

 

We sold all of our utility businesses as of April 1, 2004.  However, we have retained a potential payment obligation associated with our previous electric utility activities in the State of Vermont.  The Vermont Joint Owners (VJO), a consortium of 14 Vermont utilities, including us, entered into a purchase power agreement with Hydro-Quebec in 1987. The agreement contains “step-up” provisions that state if any VJO member defaults on its purchase obligation under the contract to purchase power from Hydro-Quebec, then the other VJO participants will assume responsibility for the defaulting party’s share on a pro-rata basis.  Our pro-rata share of the purchase power obligation is 10%.  If any member of the VJO defaults on its obligations under the Hydro-Quebec agreement, then the remaining members of the VJO, including us, may be required to pay for a substantially larger share of the VJO’s total purchase power obligation for the remainder of the agreement (which runs through 2015).  ASC Topic 840 requires that we disclose “the maximum potential amount of future payments (undiscounted) that the guarantor could be required to make under the guarantee.”  ASC Topic 840 also states that we must make such disclosure “… even if the likelihood of the guarantor’s having to make any payments under the guarantee is remote…”  As noted above, our obligation only arises as a result of default by another VJO member, such as upon bankruptcy.  Therefore, to satisfy the “maximum potential amount” disclosure requirement we must assume that all members of the VJO simultaneously default, an unlikely scenario given that all VJO members are regulated utility providers with regulated cost recovery.   Despite the remote chance that such an event could occur, or that the State of Vermont could or would allow such an event, assuming that all the members of the VJO defaulted on January 1, 2014 and remained in default for the duration of the contract (another 2 years), we estimate that our undiscounted purchase obligation for 2014 through 2015 would be approximately $287.4 million.  In such a scenario, the Company would then own the power and could seek to recover its costs.  We would do this by seeking to recover our costs from the defaulting members and/or reselling the power to other utility providers or the northeast power grid.  There is an active market for the sale of power.  We could potentially lose money if we were unable to sell the power at cost.  We caution that we cannot predict with any degree of certainty any potential outcome.

 

At December 31, 2013, we have outstanding performance letters of credit as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

($ in thousands)

 

 

Amount

    

 

 

 

 

CNA Financial Corporation (CNA)

 

 

$

45,659 

All other

 

 

 

1,186 

Total

 

 

$

46,845 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CNA serves as our agent with respect to general liability claims (auto, workers compensation and other insured perils of the Company). As our agent, they administer all claims and make payments for claims on our behalf. We reimburse CNA for such services upon presentation of their invoice. To serve as our agent and make payments on our behalf, CNA requires that we establish a letter of credit in their favor. CNA could potentially draw against this letter of credit if we failed to reimburse CNA in accordance with the terms of our agreement. The amount of the letter of credit is reviewed annually and adjusted based on claims history.

None of the above letters of credit restrict our cash balances.