XML 89 R19.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Fair Value Measurement
12 Months Ended
Dec. 31, 2012
Fair Value Disclosures [Abstract]  
Fair Value Measurement
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENT:
 
The following table sets forth the Company’s assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at the date indicated:
 
 
Fair Value
as of
 
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2012
Using Fair Value Hierarchy
 
 
December 31, 2012
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity derivatives
 
$
1

 
$

 
$
1

 
$

Total
 
$
1

 
$

 
$
1

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Commodity derivatives
 
$
13

 
$

 
$
13

 
$

Interest-rate swap derivatives
 
77

 

 
77

 

Total
 
$
90

 
$

 
$
90

 
$



 
 
Fair Value
as of
 
Fair Value Measurements at
December 31, 2011
Using Fair Value Hierarchy
 
 
December 31, 2011
 
Level 1
 
Level 2
 
Level 3
Assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity derivatives
 
$
4

 
$

 
$
4

 
$

Long-term investments
 
1

 
1

 

 

Total
 
$
5

 
$
1

 
$
4

 
$

Liabilities:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Commodity derivatives
 
$
44

 
$

 
$
44

 
$

Interest-rate swap derivatives
 
80

 

 
80

 

Total
 
$
124

 
$

 
$
124

 
$



The Company’s Level 1 instruments primarily consisted of trading securities related to a non-qualified deferred compensation plan that are valued based on active market quotes. The Company’s Level 2 instruments primarily include natural gas and NGL price swaps and NGL processing spread swap derivatives and interest-rate swap derivatives that are valued using pricing models based on an income approach that discounts future cash flows to a present value amount.  The significant pricing model inputs for natural gas and NGL price swaps and NGL processing spread swap derivatives include published NYMEX forward index prices for delivery of natural gas at Henry Hub, Permian Basin and Waha, and NGL at Mont Belvieu.  The significant pricing model inputs for interest-rate swaps include published rates for U.S. Dollar LIBOR interest rate swaps.  The pricing models also adjust for nonperformance risk associated with the counterparty or Company, as applicable, through the use of credit risk adjusted discount rates based on published default rates.  The Company did not have any Level 3 instruments measured at fair value at December 31, 2012 or December 31, 2011 and there were no transfers between hierarchy levels.

The approximate fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable is equal to book value, due to their short-term nature.