XML 78 R20.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.6
Accounting Policies (Policies)
3 Months Ended
Mar. 31, 2012
ASU 2010-26, Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts

ASU 2010-26, Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts

 

In October 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2010-26, Accounting for Costs Associated with Acquiring or Renewing Insurance Contracts. ASU 2010-26 modifies the definitions of the type of costs incurred by insurance entities that can be capitalized in the successful acquisition of new and renewal contracts. ASU 2010-26 requires incremental direct costs of successful contract acquisition as well as certain costs related to underwriting, policy issuance and processing, medical and inspection and sales force contract selling for successful contract acquisition to be capitalized. These incremental direct costs and other costs are those that are essential to the contract transaction and would not have been incurred had the contract transaction not occurred. We retrospectively adopted ASU 2010-26 on January 1, 2012. This ASU reduced our shareholders’ equity by $22 million after tax, or $0.13 book value per share as of December 31, 2011.

 

The following table illustrates the effect of adopting ASU 2010-26 in the condensed consolidated balance sheets:

 

 

(In millions, except per share amounts)   March 31,     December 31,
    2012     2011
          As Reported     As Adjusted     Difference  
Deferred policy acquisition costs   $ 483     $ 510     $ 477     $ (33 )
Total assets     16,022       15,668       15,635       (33 )
Deferred income tax     388       314       303       (11 )
Shareholders' equity     5,207       5,055       5,033       (22 )

 

 

The following table illustrates the effect of adopting ASU 2010-26 in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income:

 

 

(In millions, except per share amounts)   Three months ended March 31,  
    2012     2011      
          As Reported     As Adjusted     Difference  
Underwriting, acquisition and insurance expenses   $ 274     $ 261     $ 262     $ 1  
Net income     86       62       61       (1 )
Net income per share:                                
Basic   $ 0.53     $ 0.38     $ 0.38     $ 0.00  
Diluted     0.53       0.38       0.38       0.00  
ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS

ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS

 

In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-04, Fair Value Measurements, Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS). The ASU converges fair value measurement and disclosures among U.S. GAAP and IFRS. ASU 2011-04 changes certain fair value measurement principles and expands disclosure requirements. The company adopted ASU 2011-04 during the first quarter of 2012, and it did not have a material impact on our company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.

ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income

ASU No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income

 

In December 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-12, Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income in Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, Presentation of Comprehensive Income. ASU 2011-05 requires entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net income and the components of other comprehensive income either in a single, continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. ASU 2011-12 defers the changes in ASU 2011-05 that relate to the presentation of reclassification adjustments. The deferral of those changes allows the FASB time to redeliberate whether to present on the face of the financial statements the effects of reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income for all periods presented. The company adopted ASU 2011-12 and ASU 2011-05 during the first quarter of 2012, and it did not have a material impact on our company’s financial position, cash flows or results of operations.