Income Taxes	9 Months Ended
Sep. 30, 2015
Income Tax Disclosure [Abstract]
Income Taxes	NOTE 5 — INCOME TAXES The Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was 44% and 37%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was greater than the Federal statutory rate due to non-deductible expenses related to the revaluation of liabilities associated with the purchase of Big Fish Games, state and local income tax expense and certain expenses that were not deductible for tax purposes. These additional tax expenses were partially mitigated by the manufacturing deduction that will be available associated with the development of social games by Big Fish Games. Certain tax authorities may periodically audit the Company, and the Company may occasionally be assessed interest and penalties by tax jurisdictions. The Company recognizes accrued interest from uncertain income tax benefits in its income tax provision, while penalties are accrued in selling, general and administrative expenses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company didn’t record any interest expense related to uncertain income tax benefits. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had gross uncertain tax benefits of $2.2 million. If these benefits had been recognized, there would have been a $1.9 million decrease to annual income tax expense. During October 2012, the Company funded a $2.9 million income tax payment to the State of Illinois related to a dispute over its state income tax apportionment methodology, which was recorded as an other asset. The Company filed its state income tax returns related to the years 2002 through 2005 following the methodology prescribed by Illinois statute; however, the State of Illinois took a contrary tax position. The Company filed a formal protest with the State of Illinois during the fourth quarter of 2012. The Company won its protest and the state has elected not to appeal the court decision. During July 2015, the Company received the $2.9 million refund. The refund did not have an impact on the Company’s tax rate.

Income Taxes

9 Months Ended

Sep. 30, 2015

NOTE 5 — INCOME TAXES

The Company’s effective tax rate from continuing operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 was 44% and 37%, respectively. The effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was greater than the Federal statutory rate due to non-deductible expenses related to the revaluation of liabilities associated with the purchase of Big Fish Games, state and local income tax expense and certain expenses that were not deductible for tax purposes. These additional tax expenses were partially mitigated by the manufacturing deduction that will be available associated with the development of social games by Big Fish Games.

Certain tax authorities may periodically audit the Company, and the Company may occasionally be assessed interest and penalties by tax jurisdictions. The Company recognizes accrued interest from uncertain income tax benefits in its income tax provision, while penalties are accrued in selling, general and administrative expenses. During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company didn’t record any interest expense related to uncertain income tax benefits. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had gross uncertain tax benefits of $2.2 million. If these benefits had been recognized, there would have been a $1.9 million decrease to annual income tax expense.

During October 2012, the Company funded a $2.9 million income tax payment to the State of Illinois related to a dispute over its state income tax apportionment methodology, which was recorded as an other asset. The Company filed its state income tax returns related to the years 2002 through 2005 following the methodology prescribed by Illinois statute; however, the State of Illinois took a contrary tax position. The Company filed a formal protest with the State of Illinois during the fourth quarter of 2012. The Company won its protest and the state has elected not to appeal the court decision. During July 2015, the Company received the $2.9 million refund. The refund did not have an impact on the Company’s tax rate.