Derivative Instruments

6 Months Ended

Jun. 30, 2011

Derivative Instruments

8: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

In order to limit exposure to certain market risks, primarily changes in commodity prices, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates, CMS Energy and Consumers may enter into various risk management contracts, such as forward contracts, futures, options, and swaps. In entering into these contracts, they follow established policies and procedures under the direction of an executive oversight committee consisting of senior management representatives and a risk committee consisting of business unit managers. Neither CMS Energy nor Consumers enters into any derivatives for trading purposes.

The contracts used to manage market risks may qualify as derivative instruments. If a contract is a derivative and does not qualify for the normal purchases and sales exception, the contract is recorded on the balance sheet at its fair value. Each reporting period, the resulting asset or liability is adjusted to reflect any change in the fair value of the contract. Since none of CMS Energy's or Consumers' derivatives has been designated as an accounting hedge, all changes in fair value are reported in earnings. For a discussion of how CMS Energy and Consumers determine the fair value of their derivatives, see Note 2, Fair Value Measurements.

Commodity Price Risk: In order to support ongoing operations, CMS Energy and Consumers enter into contracts for the future purchase and sale of various commodities, such as electricity, natural gas, and coal. These forward contracts are generally long-term in nature and result in physical delivery of the commodity at a contracted price. Most of these contracts are not subject to derivative accounting because:

• they do not have a notional amount (that is, a number of units specified in a derivative instrument, such as MWh of electricity or bcf of natural gas);

• they qualify for the normal purchases and sales exception; or

• there is not an active market for the commodity.

CMS Energy's and Consumers' coal purchase contracts are not derivatives because there is not an active market for the coal they purchase. If an active market for coal develops in the future, some of these contracts may qualify as derivatives. For Consumers, which is subject to regulatory accounting, the resulting fair value gains and losses would be deferred as regulatory assets or liabilities and would not affect net income. No other subsidiaries of CMS Energy enter into coal purchase contracts.

Consumers also uses FTRs to manage price risk related to electricity transmission congestion. An FTR is a financial instrument that entitles its holder to receive compensation or requires its holder to remit payment for congestion-related transmission charges. FTRs are accounted for as derivatives. Under regulatory accounting, all changes in fair value associated with these instruments are deferred as regulatory assets or liabilities until the instruments are settled.

CMS ERM has not designated its contracts to purchase and sell electricity and natural gas as normal purchases and sales and, therefore, CMS Energy accounts for those contracts as derivatives. To manage commodity price risks associated with these forward purchase and sale contracts, CMS ERM uses various financial instruments, such as futures, options, and swaps. At June 30, 2011, CMS ERM held the following derivative contracts:

• a forward contract for the physical sale of 608 GWh of electricity through 2015 on behalf of one of CMS Energy's non-utility generating plants;

• futures contracts through 2011 as an economic hedge of 22 percent of the generating plant's natural gas requirements needed to serve a steam sales contract, for a total of 0.1 bcf of natural gas;

• forward contracts to purchase 2.5 bcf and sell 4.2 bcf of natural gas through 2012 in CMS ERM's role as a marketer of natural gas for third-party producers; and

• an option to sell 305 GWh of electricity, and as an economic hedge, contracts to purchase 0.4 bcf of natural gas through 2011.

Presented in the following table are the fair values of CMS Energy's and Consumers' derivative instruments:

In Millions
	Derivative Assets					Derivative Liabilities
	Balance	Fair Value at				Balance	Fair Value at
	Sheet	June 30,		December 31,		Sheet	June 30,		December 31,
	Location	2011		2010		Location	2011		2010
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity contracts1	Other assets	$	3	$	1	Other liabilities2	$	3	$	4
Consumers
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity contracts	Other assets	$	3	$	1	Other liabilities	$	—	$	—

1	Assets and liabilities are presented gross and exclude the impact of offsetting derivative assets and liabilities under master netting agreements, which was less than $1 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
2	Liabilities exclude the impact of offsetting cash margin deposits paid by CMS ERM to other parties, which was less than $1 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. CMS Energy presents these liabilities net of these impacts on its consolidated balance sheets.

Presented in the following table is the effect on CMS Energy's and Consumers' consolidated statements of income of their derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

In Millions
	Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income
Location of Gain (Loss) on	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
Derivatives Recognized in Income	2011			2010			2011		2010
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Commodity contracts
Operating revenue	$	(1	)	$	(2	)	$	—	$	3
Fuel for electric generation		—			—			—		2
Purchased and interchange power		—			—			—		1
Total CMS Energy	$	(1	)	$	(2	)	$	—	$	6

Consumers' gains on FTRs deferred as regulatory liabilities were $3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. These amounts were $3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

CMS Energy's derivative liabilities subject to credit-risk-related contingent features were less than $1 million at June 30, 2011 and were $1 million at December 31, 2010.

Credit Risk: CMS Energy's swaps, options, and forward contracts contain credit risk, which is the risk that a counterparty will fail to meet its contractual obligations. CMS Energy reduces this risk through established policies and procedures. CMS Energy assesses credit quality by considering credit ratings, financial condition, and other available information for counterparties. A credit limit is established for each counterparty based on the evaluation of its credit quality. Exposure to potential loss under each contract is monitored and action is taken when appropriate.

CMS ERM enters into contracts primarily with companies in the electric and gas industry. This industry concentration may have a positive or negative impact on CMS Energy's exposure to credit risk based on how similar changes in economic conditions, the weather, or other conditions affect these counterparties. CMS ERM reduces its credit risk exposure by using industry-standard agreements that allow for netting positive and negative exposures associated with the same counterparty. Typically, these agreements also allow each party to demand adequate assurance of future performance from the other party, when there is reason to do so.

At June 30, 2011, if counterparties within this industry concentration all failed to meet their contractual obligations, the loss to CMS Energy on contracts accounted for as derivatives would be less than $1 million.

CMS Energy does not expect a material adverse effect on its consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income as a result of counterparty nonperformance, given CMS Energy's credit policies, current exposures, and credit reserves.

Consumers Energy Company [Member]

Derivative Instruments

8: DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS

In order to limit exposure to certain market risks, primarily changes in commodity prices, interest rates, and foreign exchange rates, CMS Energy and Consumers may enter into various risk management contracts, such as forward contracts, futures, options, and swaps. In entering into these contracts, they follow established policies and procedures under the direction of an executive oversight committee consisting of senior management representatives and a risk committee consisting of business unit managers. Neither CMS Energy nor Consumers enters into any derivatives for trading purposes.

The contracts used to manage market risks may qualify as derivative instruments. If a contract is a derivative and does not qualify for the normal purchases and sales exception, the contract is recorded on the balance sheet at its fair value. Each reporting period, the resulting asset or liability is adjusted to reflect any change in the fair value of the contract. Since none of CMS Energy's or Consumers' derivatives has been designated as an accounting hedge, all changes in fair value are reported in earnings. For a discussion of how CMS Energy and Consumers determine the fair value of their derivatives, see Note 2, Fair Value Measurements.

Commodity Price Risk: In order to support ongoing operations, CMS Energy and Consumers enter into contracts for the future purchase and sale of various commodities, such as electricity, natural gas, and coal. These forward contracts are generally long-term in nature and result in physical delivery of the commodity at a contracted price. Most of these contracts are not subject to derivative accounting because:

• they do not have a notional amount (that is, a number of units specified in a derivative instrument, such as MWh of electricity or bcf of natural gas);

• they qualify for the normal purchases and sales exception; or

• there is not an active market for the commodity.

CMS Energy's and Consumers' coal purchase contracts are not derivatives because there is not an active market for the coal they purchase. If an active market for coal develops in the future, some of these contracts may qualify as derivatives. For Consumers, which is subject to regulatory accounting, the resulting fair value gains and losses would be deferred as regulatory assets or liabilities and would not affect net income. No other subsidiaries of CMS Energy enter into coal purchase contracts.

Consumers also uses FTRs to manage price risk related to electricity transmission congestion. An FTR is a financial instrument that entitles its holder to receive compensation or requires its holder to remit payment for congestion-related transmission charges. FTRs are accounted for as derivatives. Under regulatory accounting, all changes in fair value associated with these instruments are deferred as regulatory assets or liabilities until the instruments are settled.

CMS ERM has not designated its contracts to purchase and sell electricity and natural gas as normal purchases and sales and, therefore, CMS Energy accounts for those contracts as derivatives. To manage commodity price risks associated with these forward purchase and sale contracts, CMS ERM uses various financial instruments, such as futures, options, and swaps. At June 30, 2011, CMS ERM held the following derivative contracts:

• a forward contract for the physical sale of 608 GWh of electricity through 2015 on behalf of one of CMS Energy's non-utility generating plants;

• futures contracts through 2011 as an economic hedge of 22 percent of the generating plant's natural gas requirements needed to serve a steam sales contract, for a total of 0.1 bcf of natural gas;

• forward contracts to purchase 2.5 bcf and sell 4.2 bcf of natural gas through 2012 in CMS ERM's role as a marketer of natural gas for third-party producers; and

• an option to sell 305 GWh of electricity, and as an economic hedge, contracts to purchase 0.4 bcf of natural gas through 2011.

Presented in the following table are the fair values of CMS Energy's and Consumers' derivative instruments:

In Millions
	Derivative Assets					Derivative Liabilities
	Balance	Fair Value at				Balance	Fair Value at
	Sheet	June 30,		December 31,		Sheet	June 30,		December 31,
	Location	2011		2010		Location	2011		2010
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity contracts1	Other assets	$	3	$	1	Other liabilities2	$	3	$	4
Consumers
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments
Commodity contracts	Other assets	$	3	$	1	Other liabilities	$	—	$	—

1	Assets and liabilities are presented gross and exclude the impact of offsetting derivative assets and liabilities under master netting agreements, which was less than $1 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010.
2	Liabilities exclude the impact of offsetting cash margin deposits paid by CMS ERM to other parties, which was less than $1 million at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010. CMS Energy presents these liabilities net of these impacts on its consolidated balance sheets.

Presented in the following table is the effect on CMS Energy's and Consumers' consolidated statements of income of their derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:

In Millions
	Amount of Gain (Loss) on Derivatives Recognized in Income
Location of Gain (Loss) on	Three Months Ended June 30						Six Months Ended June 30
Derivatives Recognized in Income	2011			2010			2011		2010
CMS Energy, including Consumers
Commodity contracts
Operating revenue	$	(1	)	$	(2	)	$	—	$	3
Fuel for electric generation		—			—			—		2
Purchased and interchange power		—			—			—		1
Total CMS Energy	$	(1	)	$	(2	)	$	—	$	6

Consumers' gains on FTRs deferred as regulatory liabilities were $3 million for the three months ended June 30, 2011 and $1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2010. These amounts were $3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and $1 million for the six months ended June 30, 2010.

CMS Energy's derivative liabilities subject to credit-risk-related contingent features were less than $1 million at June 30, 2011 and were $1 million at December 31, 2010.

Credit Risk: CMS Energy's swaps, options, and forward contracts contain credit risk, which is the risk that a counterparty will fail to meet its contractual obligations. CMS Energy reduces this risk through established policies and procedures. CMS Energy assesses credit quality by considering credit ratings, financial condition, and other available information for counterparties. A credit limit is established for each counterparty based on the evaluation of its credit quality. Exposure to potential loss under each contract is monitored and action is taken when appropriate.

CMS ERM enters into contracts primarily with companies in the electric and gas industry. This industry concentration may have a positive or negative impact on CMS Energy's exposure to credit risk based on how similar changes in economic conditions, the weather, or other conditions affect these counterparties. CMS ERM reduces its credit risk exposure by using industry-standard agreements that allow for netting positive and negative exposures associated with the same counterparty. Typically, these agreements also allow each party to demand adequate assurance of future performance from the other party, when there is reason to do so.

At June 30, 2011, if counterparties within this industry concentration all failed to meet their contractual obligations, the loss to CMS Energy on contracts accounted for as derivatives would be less than $1 million.

CMS Energy does not expect a material adverse effect on its consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income as a result of counterparty nonperformance, given CMS Energy's credit policies, current exposures, and credit reserves.