XML 171 R38.htm IDEA: XBRL DOCUMENT v2.4.0.8
Fair Value Option (Tables)
6 Months Ended
Jun. 30, 2014
Fair Value Option [Abstract]  
Changes in fair value under the fair value option election
The following table presents the changes in fair value included in the Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, for items for which the fair value option was elected. The profit and loss information presented below only includes the financial instruments that were elected to be measured at fair value; related risk management instruments, which are required to be measured at fair value, are not included in the table.
 
Three months ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
(in millions)
Principal transactions
Other income
Total changes in fair value recorded
 
Principal transactions
Other income
Total changes in fair value recorded
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
$
96

$

 
$
96

 
$
(287
)
$

 
$
(287
)
Securities borrowed
(2
)

 
(2
)
 
(8
)

 
(8
)
Trading assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans
245

3

(b) 
248

 
(14
)
4

(b) 
(10
)
Loans reported as trading assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk
391

3

(b) 
394

 
211

26

(b) 
237

Other changes in fair value
38

400

(b) 
438

 
(94
)
253

(b) 
159

Loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk
20


 
20

 
(1
)

 
(1
)
Other changes in fair value
24


 
24

 
21


 
21

Other assets
7

(30
)
(c) 
(23
)
 
22

(20
)
(c) 
2

Deposits(a)
(107
)

 
(107
)
 
219


 
219

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements
(18
)

 
(18
)
 
41


 
41

Other borrowed funds(a) 
(911
)

 
(911
)
 
734


 
734

Trading liabilities
(3
)

 
(3
)
 
(14
)

 
(14
)
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs
(48
)

 
(48
)
 
(69
)

 
(69
)
Other liabilities
(27
)

 
(27
)
 


 

Long-term debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk(a) 
82


 
82

 
159


 
159

Other changes in fair value
(773
)

 
(773
)
 
1,000


 
1,000


 
Six months ended June 30,
 
2014
 
2013
(in millions)
Principal transactions
Other income
Total changes in fair value recorded
 
Principal transactions
Other income
Total changes in fair value recorded
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under resale agreements
$
56

$

 
$
56

 
$
(358
)
$

 
$
(358
)
Securities borrowed
(5
)

 
(5
)
 
18


 
18

Trading assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
Debt and equity instruments, excluding loans
475

1

(b) 
476

 
242

7

(b) 
249

Loans reported as trading assets:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk
754

12

(b) 
766

 
539

38

(b) 
577

Other changes in fair value
102

692

(b) 
794

 
(78
)
1,205

(b) 
1,127

Loans:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk
28


 
28

 
(6
)

 
(6
)
Other changes in fair value
31


 
31

 
21


 
21

Other assets
12

(142
)
(c) 
(130
)
 
21

(89
)
(c) 
(68
)
Deposits(a)
(211
)

 
(211
)
 
297


 
297

Federal funds purchased and securities loaned or sold under repurchase agreements
(34
)

 
(34
)
 
45


 
45

Other borrowed funds(a) 
(1,171
)

 
(1,171
)
 
380


 
380

Trading liabilities
(9
)

 
(9
)
 
(32
)

 
(32
)
Beneficial interests issued by consolidated VIEs
(137
)

 
(137
)
 
(97
)

 
(97
)
Other liabilities
(27
)

 
(27
)
 

(1
)
(c) 
(1
)
Long-term debt:
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

 
 
Changes in instrument-specific credit risk(a) 
5


 
5

 
192


 
192

Other changes in fair value(b)
(791
)

 
(791
)
 
969


 
969

(a)
Total changes in instrument-specific credit risk (DVA) related to structured notes were $134 million and $251 million for the three months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and $19 million and $382 million for the six months ended June 30, 2014 and 2013, respectively. These totals include such changes for structured notes classified within deposits and other borrowed funds, as well as long-term debt.
(b)
Reported in mortgage fees and related income.
(c)
Reported in other income.

Difference between aggregate fair value and aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding
The following table reflects the difference between the aggregate fair value and the aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, for loans, long-term debt and long-term beneficial interests for which the fair value option has been elected.
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
(in millions)
Contractual principal outstanding
 
Fair value
Fair value over/(under) contractual principal outstanding
 
Contractual principal outstanding
 
Fair value
Fair value over/(under) contractual principal outstanding
Loans(a)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nonaccrual loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans reported as trading assets
$
4,462

 
$
1,270

$
(3,192
)
 
$
5,156

 
$
1,491

$
(3,665
)
Loans
214

 
154

(60
)
 
209

 
154

(55
)
Subtotal
4,676

 
1,424

(3,252
)
 
5,365

 
1,645

(3,720
)
All other performing loans
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans reported as trading assets
35,185

 
31,920

(3,265
)
 
33,069

 
29,295

(3,774
)
Loans
3,934

 
3,877

(57
)
 
1,618

 
1,563

(55
)
Total loans
$
43,795

 
$
37,221

$
(6,574
)
 
$
40,052

 
$
32,503

$
(7,549
)
Long-term debt
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Principal-protected debt
$
15,634

(c) 
$
15,882

$
248

 
$
15,797

(c) 
$
15,909

$
112

Nonprincipal-protected debt(b)
NA

 
15,260

NA

 
NA

 
12,969

NA

Total long-term debt
NA

 
$
31,142

NA

 
NA

 
$
28,878

NA

Long-term beneficial interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nonprincipal-protected debt(b)
NA

 
$
2,094

NA

 
NA

 
$
1,996

NA

Total long-term beneficial interests
NA

 
$
2,094

NA

 
NA

 
$
1,996

NA

(a)
There were no performing loans that were ninety days or more past due as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013.
(b)
Remaining contractual principal is not applicable to nonprincipal-protected notes. Unlike principal-protected structured notes, for which the Firm is obligated to return a stated amount of principal at the maturity of the note, nonprincipal-protected structured notes do not obligate the Firm to return a stated amount of principal at maturity, but to return an amount based on the performance of an underlying variable or derivative feature embedded in the note. However, investors are exposed to the credit risk of the Firm as issuer for both nonprincipal-protected and principal protected notes.
(c)
Where the Firm issues principal-protected zero-coupon or discount notes, the balance reflected as the remaining contractual principal is the final principal payment at maturity.
Fair value, option, structured notes by balance sheet classification and primary embedded derivative risk
The table below presents the fair value of the structured notes issued by the Firm, by balance sheet classification and the primary risk to which the structured notes’ embedded derivative relates.
 
June 30, 2014
 
December 31, 2013
(in millions)
Long-term debt
Other borrowed funds
Deposits
Total
 
Long-term debt
Other borrowed funds
Deposits
Total
Risk exposure
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest rate
$
10,505

$
461

$
1,735

$
12,701

 
$
9,516

$
615

$
1,270

$
11,401

Credit
4,429

124


4,553

 
4,248

13


4,261

Foreign exchange
2,307

136

16

2,459

 
2,321

194

27

2,542

Equity
12,512

13,510

4,184

30,206

 
11,082

11,936

3,736

26,754

Commodity
1,154

589

1,570

3,313

 
1,260

310

1,133

2,703

Total structured notes
$
30,907

$
14,820

$
7,505

$
53,232

 
$
28,427

$
13,068

$
6,166

$
47,661