-----BEGIN PRIVACY-ENHANCED MESSAGE-----
Proc-Type: 2001,MIC-CLEAR
Originator-Name: webmaster@www.sec.gov
Originator-Key-Asymmetric:
MFgwCgYEVQgBAQICAf8DSgAwRwJAW2sNKK9AVtBzYZmr6aGjlWyK3XmZv3dTINen
TWSM7vrzLADbmYQaionwg5sDW3P6oaM5D3tdezXMm7z1T+B+twIDAQAB
MIC-Info: RSA-MD5,RSA,
GDik3lHIOVW/vkaXSCEHNNAJDvRc8HRpVhd0TNhQuhDISAWbHv0AWaUucP8OmT85
SpX9wtgAhx0qrNBGhyg/4A==
UNITED STATES FORM 10-K [X] Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2002 or [ ] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the transition period from __________ to __________. Commission File Number 0-8185 CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION Michigan 38-2022454 333 E. Main Street Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (989) 839-5350 Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Common Stock, $1 Par Value Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No ____ Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. (X) Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2). Yes X No ____ The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant as of June 28, 2002, was $744,534,000. The number of shares outstanding of the registrant's Common Stock, $1 par value, at February 28, 2003, was 23,695,038. DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Portions of the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, are incorporated by reference in Parts I and II (Items 1 and 5-8). FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS This report contains forward-looking statements that are based on management's beliefs, assumptions, current expectations, estimates and projections about the financial services industry, the economy, and about Chemical Financial Corporation itself. Words such as "anticipates," "believes," "estimates," "judgment," "expects," "forecasts," "intends," "is likely," "plans," "predicts," "projects," variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. In addition, certain statements under the captions "Liquidity Risk," "Interest Rate Risk" and "Regulatory Matters" in Management's Discussion and Analysis are forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions ("risk factors") that are difficult to predict with regard to timing, extent, likelihood and degree of occurrence. Therefore, actual results and outcomes may materially differ from what may be expressed or forecast
ed in such forward-looking statements. Chemical Financial Corporation undertakes no obligation to update, amend or clarify forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Risk factors include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates and interest rate relationships; demand for products and services; the degree of competition by traditional and non-traditional competitors; changes in banking regulations; changes in tax laws; changes in prices, levies and assessments; the impact of technological advances and issues; governmental and regulatory policy changes; the outcomes of pending and future litigation and contingencies; trends in customer behavior as well as their ability to repay loans; changes in the national economy; and the local and global effects of the ongoing war on terrorism and the potential future expansion of that war. These are representative of the risk factors that could cause a difference between an ultimate actual outcome and a preceding forward-looking statement. PART I Item 1. Business. Chemical Financial Corporation ("Chemical" or the "Corporation") is a multibank holding company registered under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, and incorporated in the State of Michigan. Chemical was organized under Michigan law in August 1973, and is headquartered in Midland, Michigan. Chemical was substantially inactive until June 30, 1974, when it acquired its lead subsidiary bank, Chemical Bank and Trust Company ("CB&T"), pursuant to a reorganization in which the former shareholders of CB&T became shareholders of Chemical. In addition to the acquisition of CB&T, the Corporation acquired eighteen community banks and thirteen branch bank offices through December 31, 2002. The Corporation has consolidated these acquisitions into three commercial bank subsidiaries. At December 31, 2002, the Corporation's three subsidiary banks were as follows: CB&T, headquartered in Midland, Michigan; Chemical Bank Shoreline, headquartered in Benton Harbor, Michigan; and Chemical Bank West, headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan. The Corporation directly owns three non-bank subsidiaries: CFC Data Corp, CFC Financial Services, Inc. and CFC Title Services, Inc. CFC Data Corp provides data processing services to two of the Corporation's subsidiary banks and to outside customers. The data processing services provided to the Corporation's subsidiaries represented 92% of total revenue of the data processing subsidiary in 2002, 90% in 2001 and 89% in 2000. CFC Financial Services, Inc. is an insurance agency that operates under the assumed names Chemical Financial Insurance Agency (a property and casualty insurance agency) and CFC Investment Centers (a provider of mutual funds and annuity products to customers). CFC Title Services, Inc. is an issuer of title insurance to buyers and sellers of residential and commercial mortgage properties, including those occurring due to loan refinancing. At December 31, 2002, Chemical was the fourth largest bank holding company headquartered in Michigan, measured by total assets, and together with its subsidiaries employed a total of 1,412 full-time equivalent employees. Chemical's business is concentrated in a single industry segment - commercial banking. Chemical's subsidiaries offer a full range of commercial banking and fiduciary services. These include accepting deposits, business and personal checking accounts, savings and individual retirement accounts, time deposit instruments, electronically accessed banking products, residential and commercial real estate financing, commercial lending, consumer financing, debit cards, safe deposit box services, automated teller machines, access to insurance and investment products, money transfer services, corporate and personal trust services and other banking services. The principal markets for these financial services are the communities within Michigan in which Chemical's subsidiaries are located and the areas surrounding these communities. As of December 31, 2002, Chemical and its subsidiaries served these markets through 129 banking offices and 2 loan production offices across 32 counties, all in the lower peninsula of Michigan. In addition to the full service banking offices, the subsidiary banks operated 137 automated teller machines, both on and off bank premises, as of December 31, 2002. Chemical's largest and lead subsidiary bank is CB&T. CB&T represented 46% of total deposits and 38% of total loans of Chemical and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis as of December 31, 2002. Chemical's bank subsidiaries' largest loan category is residential real estate mortgages. At December 31, 2002, residential real estate loans totaled $648 million, or 31.2% of consolidated total loans. Residential real estate loans declined $121 million, or 15.7%, during 2002 as historically low interest rates prompted customers to choose long-term fixed interest rate residential real estate products, which Chemical generally sells in the secondary market. Chemical originated approximately $501 million of residential mortgage loans during 2002 which were sold in the secondary mortgage market, compared to $342 million and $59 million in residential mortgage loans originated and sold during 2001 and 2000, respectively. The significant increase in the origination of long-term fixed interest rate loans over
the past two years was attributable to the significant decline in residential mortgage interest rates and the resulting increase in the refinancing of existing residential mortgages. The principal sources of revenues for Chemical are interest and fees on loans, which accounted for 63% of total revenues in 2002, 64% of total revenues in 2001, and 62% of total revenues in 2000. Interest on investment securities is also a significant source of revenue, accounting for 21% of total revenues in 2002 and 2001and 24% of total revenues in 2000. Chemical has no foreign loans, assets or activities. No material part of the business of Chemical or its subsidiaries is dependent upon a single customer or very few customers. The business of banking is highly competitive. In addition to competition from other commercial banks, banks face significant competition from nonbank financial institutions. Savings associations and credit unions compete aggressively with commercial banks for deposits and loans, and credit unions and finance companies are particularly significant factors in the consumer loan market. Banks compete for deposits with a broad range of other types of investments, the most significant of which over the past few years have been mutual funds and annuities. Insurance companies and investment firms are also significant competitors for customer deposits. In response to this increased competition for customers' bank deposits, the Corporation's subsidiary banks, through CFC Investment Centers, offer a broad array of mutual funds, annuity products and market securities through alliances with BankMark and FutureShare Financial Services. In addition, the trust department of CB&T offers customers a variety of investm
ent products and services. The principal methods of competition for financial services are price (interest rates paid on deposits, interest rates charged on borrowings and fees charged for services) and service (convenience and quality of services rendered to customers). Banks and bank holding companies are extensively regulated. Chemical's subsidiary banks are all chartered by the State of Michigan and supervised and regulated by the Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Services. CB&T is the only bank subsidiary of Chemical that is a member of the Federal Reserve System and supervised, examined and regulated by the Federal Reserve System. The other two state non-member banks are supervised, examined and regulated by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation ("FDIC"). Deposits of all three bank subsidiaries are insured by the FDIC to the extent provided by law. Chemical has elected to be regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System ("Federal Reserve Board") as a financial holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956. State banks and bank holding companies are governed by both federal and state laws that significantly limit their business activities in a number of respects. Examples of such limitations include: (1) prior approval of the Federal Reserve Board, and in some cases various other governing agencies, is required for bank holding companies to acquire control of any additional bank holding companies, banks or branches, (2) the business activities of bank holding companies and their subsidiaries are limited to banking and to other activities which are determined by the Federal Reserve Board to be closely related to banking, and (3) transactions between bank holding company subsidiary banks are significantly restricted by banking laws and regulations. Somewhat broader activities are permitted for qualifying financial holding companies, such as Chemical, and "financial subsidiaries." Chemical currently does not have any subsidiaries that have elected to qualify as "financial subsidiaries." Chemical is a legal entity separate and distinct from its subsidiary banks and non-bank subsidiaries. Chemical's primary source of revenues results from dividends paid to it by its subsidiaries. Federal and state banking laws and regulations limit both the extent to which Chemical's subsidiary banks can lend or otherwise supply funds to Chemical or certain of its affiliates and also place certain restrictions on the amount of dividends the subsidiary banks of Chemical may pay to Chemical. Banks are subject to a number of federal and state laws and regulations which have a material impact on their business. These include, among others, minimum capital requirements, state usury laws, state laws relating to fiduciaries, the Truth in Lending Act, the Truth in Savings Act, the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, the Expedited Funds Availability Act, the Community Reinvestment Act, the USA Patriot Act, electronic funds transfer laws, redlining laws, predatory lending laws, antitrust laws, environmental laws, anti-money laundering laws and privacy laws. These laws and regulations can have a significant effect on the operating results of banks. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 ("1999 Act") largely removed the restrictions that previously prevented affiliations among banks, securities firms, and insurance companies and provides for a system of functional regulation of the financial services industry. Among other provisions, the 1999 Act: Repealed the restrictions on banks affiliating with securities firms contained in the depression-era Glass-Steagall Act. Created a new regulatory status of "financial holding company." A financial holding company may engage in a statutory list of financial activities, including insurance underwriting and agency activities, securities underwriting and brokerage activities, merchant banking, and insurance company portfolio investment activities. Other activities that are "complementary" to financial activities, a category defined by regulation, are also authorized for financial holding companies. Created a new regulatory status of a "financial subsidiary" with powers similar to financial holding companies. Provides a system of functional regulation under which, with certain exceptions, activities of banks and bank affiliates as securities brokers and investment advisors are subject to regulation and supervision by the Securities and Exchange Commission, eliminating an exemption banks previously enjoyed. Reaffirms the traditional authority of states to regulate insurance companies and insurance agencies, but prohibits discrimination against bank affiliates that conduct those activities. Required financial institutions to disclose their privacy policy annually to consumers and provides protections to consumers against the transfer and use of nonpublic personal information by financial institutions. Requires that agreements between banks and non-governmental entities in connection with the Community Reinvestment Act be disclosed to the public, and that community groups that receive funds from banks in excess of defined thresholds disclose how those funds are used. Although the 1999 Act repealed certain pre-existing statutory barriers to cross-industry affiliations and provides a structural framework for achieving the 1999 Act's purposes, certain details of implementing the changes authorized by the 1999 Act have been the subject of regulations adopted by the Board of Governors and the Federal Reserve System, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and other relevant federal agencies. To recharacterize itself as a financial holding company and to avail itself of the broader powers permitted for financial holding companies, a bank holding company must meet certain regulatory standards for being "well capitalized," "well-managed" and "satisfactory" in its Community Reinvestment Act compliance. The Corporation became a financial holding company in 2000. Under Federal law, the FDIC has the authority to impose special assessments on insured depository institutions to repay FDIC borrowings from the United States Treasury or other sources, and to establish semi-annual assessment rates on Bank Insurance Fund ("BIF") member banks, so as to maintain the BIF at the designated reserve ratio defined by law. The semi-annual assessment rate of the FDIC is based upon a system of risk-based premiums for deposit insurance, pursuant to which the premiums paid by a depository institution are based on the probability that the BIF will incur a loss in respect of such institution. The recapitalization of the Savings Association Insurance Fund ("SAIF") was accomplished through the enactment of The Deposit Insurance Funds Act of 1996 (the "Funds Act") on September 30, 1996. This legislation authorized the Financing Corporation ("FICO") to impose periodic assessments on depository institutions that are members of the BIF, in addition to institutions that are members of the SAIF. The purpose of these periodic assessments is to spread the cost of the interest payments on the outstanding FICO bonds over a larger number of institutions. Until the change in the law, only SAIF-member institutions bore the cost of funding these interest payments. FDIC premiums, which consisted exclusively of the FICO assessment, were $.5 million in each of the three years ended December 31, 2002. Federal law also contains a "cross-guarantee" provision that could result in insured depository institutions owned by Chemical being assessed for losses incurred by the FDIC in connection with assistance provided to, or the failure of, any other insured depository institution owned by Chemical. Under Federal Reserve Board policy, Chemical is expected to act as a source of financial strength to each subsidiary bank and to commit resources to support each subsidiary bank. Banks are subject to the provisions of the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977 ("CRA"). Under the terms of the CRA, the appropriate federal bank regulatory agency is required, in connection with its examination of a bank, to assess such bank's record in meeting the credit needs of the community served by that bank, consistent with the safe and sound operation of the institution. The regulatory agency's assessment of the bank's record is made available to the public. Further, such assessment is required of any bank which has applied to: (1) obtain deposit insurance coverage for a newly chartered institution, (2) establish a new branch office that will accept deposits, (3) relocate an office, or (4) merge or consolidate with, or acquire the assets or assume the liabilities of, a federally regulated financial institution. In the case of a bank holding company applying for approval to acquire a bank or another bank holding company, the Federal Reserve Board will assess the CRA compliance record of each su
bsidiary bank of the applicant bank holding company, and such compliance records may be the basis for denying the application. Bank holding companies may acquire banks located in any state in the United States without regard to geographic restrictions or reciprocity requirements imposed by state law. Banks may establish interstate branch networks through acquisitions of other banks. The establishment of de novo interstate branches or the acquisition of individual branches of a bank in another state (rather than the acquisition of an out-of-state bank in its entirety) is allowed only if specifically authorized by state law. Michigan permits both U.S. and non-U.S. banks to establish branch offices in Michigan. The Michigan Banking Code permits, in appropriate circumstances and with the approval of the Michigan Office of Financial and Insurance Services, Division of Financial Institutions, (1) acquisition of Michigan banks by FDIC-insured banks, savings banks or savings and loan associations located in other states, (2) sale by a Michigan bank of branches to an FDIC-insured bank, savings bank or savings and loan association located in a state in which a Michigan bank could purchase branches of the purchasing entity, (3) consolidation of Michigan banks and FDIC-insured banks, savings banks or savings and loan associations located in other states having laws permitting such consolidation, (4) establishment of branches in Michigan by FDIC-insured banks located in other states, the District of Columbia or U.S. territories or protectorates having laws permitting a Michigan bank to establish a branch in such jurisdiction, and (5) es
tablishment by foreign banks of branches located in Michigan. Mergers, Acquisitions and Consolidations The following is a summary of the business combinations completed during the three-year period ended December 31, 2002. On September 14, 2001, the Corporation acquired Bank West Financial Corporation ("BWFC"). BWFC was the parent company of Bank West, a Michigan stock savings bank with five full-service branches and one loan production office in Kent and Ottawa counties in Michigan. The purchase added approximately $300 million in total assets, $232 million in total loans and $194 million in total deposits as of the date of acquisition, for which the Corporation paid a premium of $7.3 million. Bank West was merged into the Corporation's existing subsidiary, Chemical Bank West. The Corporation exchanged $29.2 million in cash for all of the outstanding stock of BWFC. On July 13, 2001, the Corporation acquired four branch banking offices from Fifth Third Bank and Old Kent Bank in Holland, Zeeland, Grand Haven and Fremont, Michigan. The purchase of the four branch banking offices added total deposits of approximately $144 million and total loans of $97 million as of the date of acquisition, for which the Corporation paid a premium of $15.3 million. The offices in Holland, Zeeland and Grand Haven are being operated as branches of Chemical Bank Shoreline, and Chemical Bank West is operating the office in Fremont. The acquisitions of the four branches and BWFC in 2001 were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting; therefore, the financial results of these operations are included from their respective acquisition dates, with no restatement of prior period amounts. On January 9, 2001, the Corporation merged with Shoreline Financial Corporation ("Shoreline"), a one-bank holding company headquartered in Benton Harbor, Michigan and parent company of Shoreline Bank. As of the effective date of the transaction, Shoreline had total assets of approximately $1.1 billion, total deposits of approximately $.8 billion and total loans of approximately $.8 billion. The Corporation is operating Shoreline Bank through a separate subsidiary of the Corporation, Chemical Bank Shoreline, with its headquarters in Benton Harbor. The Corporation issued approximately 8.2 million shares of common stock for all of the outstanding stock of Shoreline. The transaction was accounted for as a pooling of interests business combination and, therefore, all prior period amounts included in the consolidated financial statements were restated to include Shoreline as if it had always been part of the Corporation. On December 31, 2000, the Corporation consolidated nine of its then ten subsidiary banks into two; Chemical Bank and Trust Company and Chemical Bank West. Chemical Bank South, headquartered in Marshall, Michigan remained a separate subsidiary until October 26, 2001 when it was consolidated into Chemical Bank Shoreline. In conjunction with the merger with Shoreline and the internal consolidations, the Corporation recognized $9.2 million ($7.1 million on an after-tax basis) of merger and restructuring expenses during the first quarter of 2001. The term "net operating income" utilized in this report means net income before the impact of the after-tax $7.1 million of merger and restructuring expenses. Net operating income is a measure not defined under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. On March 24, 2000, the Corporation acquired two branch banking offices from Old Kent Bank located in Evart and Morrice, Michigan. The branches had total deposits of approximately $15 million and $10 million, respectively, as of that date, for which the Corporation paid a premium of approximately $1.7 million. The offices became branch offices of existing bank subsidiaries. The transaction was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting. The nature of the business of Chemical's subsidiaries is such that they hold title to numerous parcels of real property. These properties are primarily owned for branch offices; however, Chemical and its subsidiaries may hold properties for other business purposes, as well as on a temporary basis for properties taken in, or in lieu of foreclosure, to satisfy loans in default. Under current state and federal laws, present and past owners of real property may be exposed to liability for the cost of clean up of contamination on or originating from those properties, even if they are wholly innocent of the actions that caused the contamination. These liabilities can be material and can exceed the value of the contaminated property. The information under the following captions in the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, further describes the business of Chemical and is here incorporated by reference (tables are included under the caption "Management's Discussion and Analysis"): Caption Pages Five-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data 2 Table 2. Average Balances, Tax Equivalent Interest and Effective Yields and Rates 7 Table 3. Volume and Rate Variance Analysis 8 Table 4. Summary of Loans and Loan Loss Experience 9 Table 5. Comparison of Loan Maturities and Interest Sensitivity 10 Table 6. Nonperforming Assets 12 Table 7. Allocation of the Allowance For Loan Losses 13 Table 8. Maturities and Yields of Investment Securities at December 31, 2002 16 Table 9. Summary of Investment Securities 17 Table 10. Maturity Analysis of Investment Securities 17 Management's Discussion and Analysis subheadings: "Net Interest Income," "Loans," "Nonperforming Assets," "Provision and Allowance For Loan Losses," "Liquidity Risk" and "Interest Rate Risk" 6-20 Table 11. Maturity Distribution of Time Deposits of $100,000 or More 18 Table 12. Contractual Obligations 18 Table 13. Commitments 18 Note D - Investment Securities 30-31 Note F - Loans 32 Chemical's internet website is located at www.chemicalbankmi.com. Chemical provides free of charge in the "Investor Information" section of its website copies of all periodic reports and amendments to such reports that Chemical files with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including its Annual Report on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, and Current Reports on Form 8-K. Chemical posts such reports to its website as soon as reasonably practicable after each report has been filed with or furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Item 2. Properties. The executive offices of Chemical, the main office of CB&T and Chemical's non-bank subsidiaries are located in a three story, approximately 74,000 square foot, office building in downtown Midland, which is 100% owned by CB&T. Chemical's subsidiary banks conduct business from a total of 129 banking offices as of December 31, 2002. These offices are located in the lower peninsula of Michigan. Of the banking offices, 117 are owned by the subsidiary banks and 12 are leased from independent parties with remaining lease terms of one year and three months to thirteen years and five months. This leased property is considered insignificant. Item 3. Legal Proceedings. Chemical's subsidiaries are parties, as plaintiff or defendant, to a number of legal proceedings, none of which is considered material, and all of which arose in the ordinary course of their operations. Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders. None. Supplemental Item. Executive Officers of the Registrant. Biographical information concerning Chemical's executive officers who are not directors or nominated for election to the Board of Directors, as of December 31, 2002, is presented below. Executive officer appointments are made or reaffirmed annually at the organizational meeting of the board of directors. At its regular meetings, the board of directors may also make other executive officer appointments. Bruce M. Groom, age 61, is Executive Vice President and Senior Trust Officer of Chemical Bank and Trust Company. He joined Chemical Bank and Trust Company on April 29, 1985 as Senior Vice President and was promoted to Senior Trust Officer in May 1986, First Senior Vice President in January 2001 and Executive Vice President in February 2002. Mr. Groom is an attorney. Mr. Groom is a member of the Executive Management Committee of Chemical. Lori A. Gwizdala, age 44, is Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Chemical. She joined Chemical as Controller on January 1, 1985 and was named Chief Financial Officer in May 1987, Senior Vice President in February 1991, Treasurer in April 1994 and Executive Vice President in January 2002. Ms. Gwizdala has served as Secretary to the board of directors of CFC Data Corp since May 1986, a director of CFC Financial Services, Inc. and CFC Title Services, Inc. since 1997, and a director of Chemical Bank West since January 2002. Ms. Gwizdala is a certified public accountant. Ms. Gwizdala is a member of the Executive Management Committee of Chemical. Thomas W. Kohn, age 48, is President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Chemical Bank West. Mr. Kohn became President of Chemical Bank Montcalm (merged into Chemical Bank West) in 1991 and President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Chemical Bank West in January 2002. Mr. Kohn became a director of CFC Data Corp in April 2002. Mr. Kohn is a member of the Executive Management Committee of Chemical. William C. Lauderbach, age 60, is Executive Vice President and Senior Investment Officer of Chemical Bank and Trust Company. He joined Chemical Bank and Trust Company as a Trust Officer on July 2, 1973, was promoted to Vice President and Trust Officer in March 1980, Investment Officer in January 1985, Senior Vice President in February 1991, First Senior Vice President in January 2001 and Executive Vice President in February 2002. Mr. Lauderbach is a member of the Executive Management Committee of Chemical. James R. Milroy, age 42, is Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Chemical Financial Corporation. Mr. Milroy joined Shoreline Financial Corporation and Shoreline Bank in 1990 as Vice President and Comptroller. He was promoted to Senior Vice President and Comptroller in May 1993 and Executive Vice President and Comptroller in July 1997. Mr. Milroy was named President of Shoreline Financial Corporation in June 1999 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Bank Shoreline in January 2001. Mr. Milroy was named Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Chemical Financial Corporation in January 2002. Mr. Milroy became a director of Shoreline Bank in June 1999, the Chairman of the Board of CFC Data Corp in April 2002 and a director of CFC Financial Services, Inc. and CFC Title Services, Inc. in February 2002. Mr. Milroy is a member of the Executive Management Committee of Chemical. John A. Reisner, age 57, is President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Chemical Bank and Trust Company. Mr. Reisner joined the Chemical Financial organization in 1979 and has served in various senior management positions. Mr. Reisner served as President of Chemical Bank West for thirteen years prior to his appointment in January 2002 as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Chemical Bank and Trust Company. Mr. Reisner became a director of CFC Data Corp in April, 2001. Mr. Reisner is a member of the Executive Management Committee of Chemical. James E. Tomczyk, age 50, is President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Chemical Bank Shoreline. Mr. Tomczyk joined Shoreline Bank in February 1999 as Executive Vice President of its Private Banking, Trust, and Investment divisions and became Senior Executive Vice President of these divisions in October 2000. Mr. Tomczyk became President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Chemical Bank Shoreline in January 2002. Mr. Tomczyk is a member of the Executive Management Committee of Chemical. PART II Item 5. Market for the Registrant's Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters. The information under the heading "Market for Chemical Financial Corporation Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters" on page 43 of the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, is here incorporated by reference. Item 6. Selected Financial Data. The information under the caption "Five-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data" on page 2 and the sub-heading "Financial Highlights" of "Management's Discussion and Analysis" on pages 3 through 6 (inclusive) of the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, is here incorporated by reference. Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The information under the heading "Management's Discussion and Analysis" on pages 3 through 21 (inclusive) of the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, is here incorporated by reference. Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. The information under the sub-heading "Liquidity Risk" and "Interest Rate Risk" of "Management's Discussion and Analysis" on pages 16 through 20 (inclusive) of the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, is here incorporated by reference. Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data. The financial statements, notes, and independent auditors' report on pages 22 through 42 (inclusive) of the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, is here incorporated by reference. The information under the caption "Supplemental Quarterly Financial Information (Unaudited)" on page 43 of the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002, is here incorporated by reference. Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure. Not applicable. PART III Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant. The information set forth under the heading "Chemical Financial's Board of Directors and Nominees for Election as Directors" on pages 2 and 3 and the subheading "Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance" on page 16 in the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its April 21, 2003 annual meeting of shareholders is here incorporated by reference. Item 11. Executive Compensation. The information set forth under the heading "Executive Compensation" on pages 9 through 12 (inclusive) and the sub-heading "Compensation of Directors" on page 5 in the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its April 21, 2003 annual meeting of shareholders is here incorporated by reference. Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters. The information set forth under the heading "Ownership of Chemical Financial Common Stock" on pages 6 and 7 in the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its April 21, 2003 annual meeting of shareholders is here incorporated by reference. The following table presents information regarding the equity compensation plans both approved and not approved by shareholders at December 31, 2002: Equity Compensation Plan Information Plan category Number of securities to be Weighted-average exercise Number of securities remaining Equity compensation plans Equity compensation plans not Total 500,777 $24.97 492,807
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
Midland, Michigan
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
48640
(Zip Code)
(Title of Class)
Portions of the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its April 21, 2003 annual shareholders' meeting are incorporated by reference in Part III (Items 10-13).
issued upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
price of outstanding
options, warrants and rights
(b)
available for future issuance
under equity compensation
plans (excluding securities
reflected in column (a))
(c)
approved by security holders
500,777
$24.97
418,904
approved by security holders
- --
- --
73,903
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders include the Chemical Financial Corporation 1987 Award and Stock Option Plan, the Stock Incentive Plan of 1997 and the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan for Holders of Shoreline Financial Corporation (the "Shoreline Plan"). These plans provide for awards of nonqualified stock options, incentive stock options, and/or stock appreciation rights, or a combination thereof.
The 1997 plan was approved by the shareholders at the April 21, 1997 annual meeting of shareholders. At the April 20, 1992 annual meeting of shareholders, the shareholders voted to increase the authorized shares issuable under the 1987 plan by 100,000 shares and extend the plan to April 20, 1997. Key employees of the Corporation and its subsidiaries, as the Compensation Committee of the board of directors may select from time to time, are eligible to receive awards under the 1997 plan. No employee of the Corporation may receive any awards under the 1997 plan while the employee is a member
of the Compensation Committee. No new awards may be made under the 1987 plan or the Shoreline Plan. New awards for up to 418,904 shares may be made under the 1997 plan.
The plans (other than the Shoreline Plan) provide that the option price of incentive stock options awarded shall not be less than the fair market value of the Corporation's common stock on the date of grant. Historically, options granted under the plans are first exercisable from one to five years from the date of grant, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, and expire not later than ten years and one day after the date of grant. Options granted may be designated nonqualified stock options or incentive stock options. Options granted may include stock appreciation rights that entitle the recipient to receive cash or a number of shares of common stock without payment to the Corporation that have a market value equal to the difference between the option price and the market price of the total number of shares awarded under the option at the time of exercise of the stock appreciation right. The plans provide, at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, that payment for exercise of an option ma y be made in the form of shares of the Corporation's common stock having a fair market value equal to the exercise price of the option at the time of exercise, or in cash. The plans also provide for the payment of the required tax withholding generated upon the exercise of a nonqualified stock option in the form of shares of the Corporation's common stock having a fair market value equal to the amount of the required tax withholding at the time of exercise, upon prior approval and at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. As of December 31, 2002, there were options outstanding under the Shoreline Plan for 17,884 shares of common stock with a weighted average exercise price of $19.45.
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders consists of The Chemical Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors (the "Plan"), which became effective on March 25, 2002. The 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors was terminated on March 25, 2002 and no shares were available for issuance under that plan at December 31, 2002. The Plan is designed to provide non-employee directors of the Corporation's subsidiaries and community banks, who are neither directors nor employees of the Corporation, the option of receiving their fees in the Corporation's stock. The Plan provides for a maximum of 75,000 shares of the Corporation's common stock, subject to adjustments for certain changes in the capital structure of the Corporation as defined in the Plan, to be available under the Plan. Subsidiary directors and community bank directors, who elect to participate in the Plan, may elect to contribute to the Plan fifty percent or one hundred percent of their board of director fees and/or fifty percent or one hundred percent of their director committee fees, earned as directors or community bank directors of the Corporation's subsidiaries. Contributions to the Plan are made by the Corporation's subsidiaries on behalf of each electing participant. Plan participants may terminate their participation in the Plan, at any time, by written notice of withdrawal to the Corporation. Participants will cease to be eligible to participate in the Plan when they cease to serve as directors or community bank directors of subsidiaries of the Corporation. Shares are distributed to participants annually.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions.
The information set forth under the subheading "Certain Relationships and Related Transactions" on page 16 in the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement for its April 21, 2003 annual meeting of shareholders is here incorporated by reference.
Item 14. Controls and Procedures.
Within 90 days prior to the date of filing this report, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Corporation's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Corporation's management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Corporation's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the time of such evaluation. There have been no significant changes in the Corporation's internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the time of such evaluation.
PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K.
(a) (1) Financial Statements. The following financial statements and independent auditors' report of Chemical Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries are filed as part of this report:
|
Consolidated Statements of Financial Position-December 31, 2002 and 2001 |
The financial statements, the notes to financial statements, and the independent auditors' report listed above are incorporated by reference in Item 8 of this report from the corresponding portions of the registrant's Annual Report to Shareholders for the year ended December 31, 2002.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules. The following independent auditors' report of Shoreline Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries is filed as part of this report:
Report of Independent Auditors dated January 31, 2001
(3) Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of this report:
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on March 2, 2001. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Restated Bylaws. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Commission on March 22, 2002. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Long-Term Debt. The registrant has outstanding long-term debt which at the time of this report does not exceed 10% of the registrant's total consolidated assets. The registrant agrees to furnish copies of the agreements defining the rights of holders of such long-term debt to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 1997.* Previously filed as Appendix A to the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its annual meeting of shareholders held on April 21, 1997. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Amended Award and Stock Option Plan of 1987.* Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Commission on March 22, 2002. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors.* Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, filed with the Commission on March 26, 2001. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Supplemental Pension Plan.* Previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Commission on March 22, 1999. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Restated Aloysius J. Oliver Retirement Agreement.* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Dan L. Smith Retirement Agreement.* Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Commission on March 22, 2002. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan for Holders of Shoreline Financial Corporation.* Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on March 2, 2001. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors.* Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on March 25, 2002. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors.* Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on January 7, 1999. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Computation of Per Share Earnings. |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
2002 Annual Report to Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Subsidiaries. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Consent of Independent Auditors, Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Consent of Independent Auditors, Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Powers of Attorney. |
|
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan Audited Financial Statements, Notes and Supplemental Schedule. |
|
|
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors Audited Financial Statements and Notes. |
|
|
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors Audited Financial Statements and Notes. |
|
|
|
|
|
99.4 |
|
Shoreline Financial Corporation 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan Audited Financial Statements, Notes and Supplemental Schedule. |
_____________________
* These agreements are management contracts or compensation plans or arrangements required to be filed as Exhibits to this Form 10-K.
Chemical will furnish a copy of any exhibit listed above to any shareholder of the registrant without charge upon written request to Ms. Lori A. Gwizdala, Chief Financial Officer, Chemical Financial Corporation, 333 East Main Street, Midland, Michigan 48640-0569.
(b) Reports on Form 8-K. There were no reports on Form 8-K filed during the last quarter of the year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
|
CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION |
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
s/ David B. Ramaker |
|
David B. Ramaker |
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
s/ Lori A. Gwizdala |
|
Lori A. Gwizdala |
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
March 14, 2003 |
s/ David B. Ramaker |
|
|
David B. Ramaker |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ J. Daniel Bernson |
|
|
J. Daniel Bernson |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ Nancy Bowman |
|
|
Nancy Bowman Director |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ James A. Currie |
|
|
James A. Currie |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ Michael L. Dow |
|
|
Michael L. Dow |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
s/ Lori A. Gwizdala |
|
|
Lori A. Gwizdala |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ L. Richard Marzke |
|
|
L. Richard Marzke |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ Terence F. Moore |
|
|
Terence F. Moore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ Aloysius J. Oliver |
|
|
Aloysius J. Oliver |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ Frank P. Popoff |
|
|
Frank P. Popoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ Dan L. Smith |
|
Dan L. Smith |
|
|
|
|
March 14, 2003 |
*s/ William S. Stavropoulos |
|
William S. Stavropoulos |
*By |
s/Lori A. Gwizdala |
|
|
Lori A. Gwizdala |
|
CERTIFICATIONS
I, David B. Ramaker, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Chemical Financial Corporation; |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
|
|
|
|
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
b) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
|
|
|
|
c) |
Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
|
|
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
|
|
b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and |
|
|
|
6. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: March 14, 2003
s/ David B. Ramaker |
|
David B. Ramaker |
|
I, Lori A. Gwizdala, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 10-K of Chemical Financial Corporation; |
|
|
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this annual report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period covered by this annual report; |
|
|
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this annual report; |
|
|
|
|
4. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-14 and 15d-14) for the registrant and we have: |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures to ensure that material information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which this annual report is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
b) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrant's disclosure controls and procedures as of a date within 90 days prior to the filing date of this annual report (the "Evaluation Date"); and |
|
|
|
|
c) |
Presented in this annual report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures based on our evaluation as of the Evaluation Date; |
|
|
|
5. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation, to the registrant's auditors and the audit committee of the registrant's board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent function): |
|
|
|
|
|
a) |
All significant deficiencies in the design or operation of internal controls which could adversely affect the registrant's ability to record, process, summarize and report financial data and have identified for the registrant's auditors any material weaknesses in internal controls; and |
|
|
|
|
b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees who have a significant role in the registrant's internal controls; and |
|
|
|
6. |
The registrant's other certifying officer and I have indicated in this annual report whether there were significant changes in internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls subsequent to the date of our most recent evaluation, including any corrective actions with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses. |
Date: March 14, 2003
s/ Lori A. Gwizdala |
|
Lori A. Gwizdala |
|
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
3.1 |
|
Restated Articles of Incorporation. Previously filed as Exhibit 4.1 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on March 2, 2001. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
3.2 |
|
Restated Bylaws. Previously filed as Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Commission on March 22, 2002. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
|
Long-Term Debt. The registrant has outstanding long-term debt which at the time of this report does not exceed 10% of the registrant's total consolidated assets. The registrant agrees to furnish copies of the agreements defining the rights of holders of such long-term debt to the Securities and Exchange Commission upon request. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Incentive Plan of 1997.* Previously filed as Appendix A to the registrant's definitive Proxy Statement with respect to its annual meeting of shareholders held on April 21, 1997. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.2 |
|
Amended Award and Stock Option Plan of 1987.* Previously filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Commission on March 22, 2002. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan for Directors.* Previously filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2000, filed with the Commission on March 26, 2001. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.4 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Supplemental Pension Plan.* Previously filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1998, filed with the Commission on March 22, 1999. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.5 |
|
Restated Aloysius J. Oliver Retirement Agreement.* |
|
|
|
|
|
10.6 |
|
Dan L. Smith Retirement Agreement.* Previously filed as Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001, filed with the Commission on March 22, 2002. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.7 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan for Holders of Shoreline Financial Corporation.* Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on March 2, 2001. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.8 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors.* Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on March 25, 2002. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
10.9 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors.* Previously filed as Exhibit 4.3 to the registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed with the Commission on January 7, 1999. Here incorporated by reference. |
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
|
Computation of Per Share Earnings. |
|
|
|
|
|
13 |
|
2002 Annual Report to Shareholders. |
|
|
|
|
|
21 |
|
Subsidiaries. |
|
Number |
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
23.1 |
|
Consent of Independent Auditors, Ernst & Young LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
23.2 |
|
Consent of Independent Auditors, Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP. |
|
|
|
|
|
24 |
|
Powers of Attorney. |
|
|
|
|
|
99.1 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan Audited Financial Statements, Notes and Supplemental Schedule. |
|
|
|
|
|
99.2 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors Audited Financial Statements and Notes. |
|
|
|
|
|
99.3 |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors Audited Financial Statements and Notes. |
|
|
|
|
|
99.4 |
|
Shoreline Financial Corporation 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan Audited Financial Statements, Notes and Supplemental Schedule. |
_____________________
* These agreements are management contracts or compensation or arrangements required to be filed as Exhibits to this Form 10-K.
[CROWE CHIZEK LOGO]
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Shareholders and Board of Directors
Shoreline Financial Corporation
Benton Harbor, Michigan
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Shoreline Financial Corporation as of December 31, 2000 and 1999 and the related consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporation's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Shoreline Financial Corporation as of December 31, 2000 and 1999, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000, 1999 and 1998 in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
|
/s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP |
|
|
|
|
South Bend, Indiana |
|
EXHIBIT 10.5
RETIREMENT AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT is made this 19th day of November, 2001, between ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER ("Mr. Oliver") and CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION ("Chemical"), and joined in by its subsidiary, CHEMICAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY ("Chemical Bank");
WHEREAS, Chemical is a financial holding company and a Michigan corporation; and
WHEREAS, Chemical believes that its ability to conduct its business successfully is dependent upon retaining key management employees until such time as they retire; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Oliver has been employed in an important management and chief executive position with in Chemical for over 44 years, and the parties desire to continue to maintain a relationship upon the terms and conditions set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Oliver has determined to retire from the active management of Chemical, but has agreed to provide assistance and advice to Chemical.
IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Retirement. Effective the close of business December 31, 2001, Mr. Oliver resigned and retired from his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of Chemical Financial Corporation. Mr. Oliver shall continue to serve on the Boards of Chemical and Chemical Bank and will become Chemical's non-executive Chairman effective January 1, 2002, from January 1, 2002 through December 31, 2002, without compensation for Directors' meetings. Mr. Oliver may thereafter continue his service to Chemical for such time and in such role as Chemical and he deem appropriate.
2.   Compensation and Benefits. Chemical agrees to pay to Mr. Oliver an annual compensation of Fifty Thousand Dollars ($50,000.00), commencing on the first day of January, 2002, for a period of one year or until his death, if earlier. Payments to Mr. Oliver will be made on the first business day of each month during the term of this Agreement.
  Mr. Oliver shall be provided group health benefits in accordance with the terms of Chemical's Retiree Medical and Dental Plan. If at any time Chemical terminates any such insurance plan for its retirees, Chemical may also terminate such plan for Mr. Oliver; if Chemical substitutes medical and hospitalization insurance plans for its retirees or provides additional medical or hospitalization insurance coverage for its retirees, then such substituted and/or additional insurance coverage shall be made available to Mr. Oliver.
3. Covenant Not To Compete. Mr. Oliver agrees that during the period that payments are being made to him hereunder, he shall not enter into employment or any form of equity ownership of any business which is competitive with the businesses related to, affiliated with, or managed by Chemical; provided, however, that the parties agree that this provision will be limited to a geographic area consisting of a fifty (50) mile radius from each existing business location of Chemical or any business related to, affiliated with, or managed by Chemical. In the event the Board of Directors of Chemical determines that Mr. Oliver is in violation of this covenant not to compete, it shall give written notice to him. Mr. Oliver shall have a period of ninety (90) days from the date of such notice to cease his competitive activity, and the payments hereunder shall continue during such period. If the competitive act
ivity is not terminated within the ninety (90) day period, further payments hereunder shall cease. In the
4. No Assignment. This Agreement is personal to each party to this Agreement and no party may assign or delegate any rights or obligations hereunder without first obtaining the written consent of the others.
5. Modification. This Agreement supersedes all prior agreements with respect to the matters covered hereby, and no modification of this Agreement shall be valid unless it is in writing and signed by Chemical and by Mr. Oliver.
6. Construction. This Agreement shall be governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Michigan.
7. Headings. The paragraph headings in this Agreement are for convenient reference only, and shall not modify or amend the express terms hereof.
8. Successors and Assigns. This Agreement shall be binding upon, and shall insure to the benefit of, the parties hereto and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns.
DATED: December 3, 2001 |
/s/ Aloysius J. Oliver Aloysius J. Oliver |
|
DATED: December 3, 2001 |
CHEMICAL FINANCIAL CORPORATION Alan W. Ott Its Chairman |
|
DATED: December 3, 2001 |
CHEMICAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY David B. Ramaker Its President & Chief Executive Officer |
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
RETIREMENT AGREEMENT
This First Amendment made effective the 31st day of December, 2002, between Aloysius J. Oliver (Oliver) and Chemical Financial Corporation (Chemical), and joined in by Chemical Bank and Trust Company (Chemical Bank).
WHEREAS Oliver, Chemical and Chemical Bank are parties to an agreement dated November 19, 2002, governing the terms of Oliver's continued service to Chemical following his retirement from full-time employment (the Agreement); and
WHEREAS the parties desire to extend the term of the Agreement;
IT IS, THEREFORE, AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Term. Paragraph 1 of the Agreement is amended to provide that rather than expiring on December 31, 2002, the Agreement will remain in effect until December 31, 2003.
2. Continuing Validity. In all other respects the Agreement continues effective in accordance with its original terms.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement has been executed effective as of the date first stated above.
Oliver |
Chemical Financial Corporation |
||
/s/ Aloysius J. Oliver |
By: /s/ David B. Ramaker |
||
Aloysius J. Oliver |
David B. Ramaker |
||
Chemical Bank and Trust Company |
|||
By: /s/ David B. Ramaker |
|||
David B. Ramaker, |
EXHIBIT NO. 11
Computation of Per Share Earnings
Year Ended December 31 |
|||||||||
2002 |
2001 |
2000 |
|||||||
(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts) |
|||||||||
BASIC: |
|||||||||
Average shares outstanding |
23,677 |
23,626 |
23,570 |
||||||
Net income |
$54,945 |
$42,723 |
$40,801 |
||||||
Net income per common share |
$2.32 |
$1.81 |
$1.73 |
||||||
DILUTED: |
|||||||||
Average shares outstanding |
23,677 |
23,626 |
23,570 |
||||||
Net effect of the assumed exercise of |
|||||||||
stock options-based on the treasury |
|||||||||
stock method using average market price |
65 |
66 |
71 |
||||||
23,742 |
23,692 |
23,641 |
|||||||
Net income |
$54,945 |
$42,723 |
$40,801 |
||||||
Net income per common share |
$2.31 |
$1.80 |
$1.72 |
EXHIBIT NO. 13
2002
Contents | Page | |||
Chemical Financial Corporation
|
1 | |||
Five-Year Summary of Selected Financial Data
|
2 | |||
Managements Discussion and Analysis
|
3 | |||
Consolidated Financial Statements
|
22 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
26 | |||
Report of Independent Auditors
|
42 | |||
Supplemental Quarterly Financial Information
(Unaudited)
|
43 | |||
Market for Chemical Financial Corporation
Common Stock and Related Shareholder Matters |
43 | |||
Chemical Financial Corporation Directors and
Executive Officers
|
44 |
This is Chemical Financial Corporations 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders. Chemical Financial Corporation (Chemical or the Corporation) is a diversified financial services company providing a full range of commercial, consumer, mortgage, trust, insurance and financial planning services. Chemical served a broad customer base through 129 banking offices and 2 loan production offices across 32 counties in the lower peninsula of Michigan as of December 31, 2002.
The Corporation is headquartered in Midland, Michigan, and had total assets of $3.6 billion at December 31, 2002. In addition to its banking offices, the Corporation had 137 ATM locations, with 41 located off-bank premises. The Corporation offers trust and investment services, including financial and estate planning, retirement programs, investment management and custodial services and employee benefit programs through the trust department of its lead subsidiary bank. At December 31, 2002, the trust department had assets of $1.82 billion.
At year-end, the Corporation had 1,412 employees on a full-time equivalent basis and its shareholders totaled approximately 9,100, of which approximately 5,500 were shareholders of record.
Chemical Financial Corporations 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders contains audited financial statements and a detailed financial review. Although attached to our proxy statement, this report is not part of our proxy statement, is not deemed to be soliciting material, and is not deemed to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) except to the extent that it is expressly incorporated by reference in a document filed with the SEC.
The 2002 Summary Annual Report accompanies the proxy statement. This report presents information concerning the business and financial results of Chemical Financial Corporation in a format and level of detail that we believe our shareholders will find useful and informative. Shareholders who would like to receive even more detailed information than that contained in this 2002 Annual Report to Shareholders are invited to request our Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our 2002 Annual Report on Form 10-K, as filed with the SEC, including financial statements and financial statement schedules will be provided to any shareholder, without charge, upon written request to Chemical Financial Corporation, Attn: Lori A. Gwizdala, Chief Financial Officer, 333 E. Main Street, Midland, Michigan 48640. The Annual Report on Form 10-K will also be available via our internet website www.chemicalbankmi.com in the Investor Information section.
Years Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating Results
(In thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
$145,692 | $ | 130,068 | $ | 114,908 | $ | 111,504 | $ | 105,971 | ||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
3,765 | 2,004 | 1,587 | 963 | 1,564 | ||||||||||||||||
Noninterest income
|
34,534 | 31,873 | 25,495 | 24,220 | 23,739 | ||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
93,526 | 94,597 | 78,294 | 74,546 | 71,730 | ||||||||||||||||
Net operating income(1)
|
54,945 | 49,800 | 40,801 | 40,459 | 38,160 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
54,945 | 42,723 | 40,801 | 40,459 | 38,160 | ||||||||||||||||
Per Share Data(2)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
$2.32 | $ | 1.81 | $ | 1.73 | $ | 1.70 | $ | 1.59 | ||||||||||||
Diluted
|
2.31 | 1.80 | 1.72 | 1.69 | 1.58 | ||||||||||||||||
Net operating income(1)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
2.32 | 2.11 | 1.73 | 1.70 | 1.59 | ||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
2.31 | 2.10 | 1.72 | 1.69 | 1.58 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends declared and paid
|
.91 | .87 | .80 | .72 | .67 | ||||||||||||||||
Book value at end of period
|
18.17 | 16.48 | 15.17 | 13.91 | 13.70 | ||||||||||||||||
Market value at end of period
|
30.59 | 28.67 | 21.09 | 26.70 | 28.87 | ||||||||||||||||
Shares outstanding at end of period (In
thousands)(2)
|
23,684 | 23,640 | 23,592 | 23,680 | 24,011 | ||||||||||||||||
At Year End (In
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 3,568,893 | $ | 3,488,306 | $ | 3,047,388 | $ | 2,903,612 | $ | 2,827,890 | |||||||||||
Loans
|
2,075,186 | 2,182,541 | 1,848,630 | 1,711,570 | 1,533,452 | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
2,847,272 | 2,789,524 | 2,443,155 | 2,354,656 | 2,350,113 | ||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
157,393 | 167,893 | 116,806 | 111,025 | 57,478 | ||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
430,339 | 389,456 | 357,910 | 329,398 | 329,050 | ||||||||||||||||
Average Balances (In
thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Assets
|
$ | 3,539,138 | $ | 3,213,561 | $ | 3,000,505 | $ | 2,868,323 | $ | 2,712,472 | |||||||||||
Interest-earning assets
|
3,326,111 | 3,026,296 | 2,813,073 | 2,675,669 | 2,538,041 | ||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
2,085,744 | 1,996,803 | 1,771,306 | 1,618,566 | 1,500,631 | ||||||||||||||||
Deposits
|
2,825,975 | 2,582,480 | 2,431,954 | 2,355,876 | 2,261,033 | ||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
162,332 | 132,103 | 107,215 | 84,993 | 59,866 | ||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
406,762 | 369,829 | 340,181 | 329,244 | 313,806 | ||||||||||||||||
Financial Ratios
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Return on average assets net income
|
1.55 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.41 | % | |||||||||||
Return on average assets net
operating income(1)
|
1.55 | 1.55 | 1.36 | 1.41 | 1.41 | ||||||||||||||||
Return on average equity net income
|
13.5 | 11.6 | 12.0 | 12.3 | 12.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Return on average equity net
operating income(1)
|
13.5 | 13.5 | 12.0 | 12.3 | 12.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Net interest margin
|
4.44 | 4.38 | 4.18 | 4.27 | 4.28 | ||||||||||||||||
Efficiency ratio(3)
|
51.3 | 52.0 | 54.7 | 53.9 | 54.2 | ||||||||||||||||
Average shareholders equity to average
assets
|
11.5 | 11.5 | 11.3 | 11.5 | 11.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid per share to diluted net
income per share
|
39.4 | 48.3 | 46.5 | 42.6 | 42.4 | ||||||||||||||||
Tangible equity to assets
|
11.0 | 10.1 | 11.1 | 10.7 | 11.0 | ||||||||||||||||
Total risk-based capital
|
18.6 | 17.4 | 21.1 | 22.0 | 22.6 | ||||||||||||||||
Credit Quality Statistics
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses to total loans
|
1.48 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.69 | % | |||||||||||
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans
|
.35 | .60 | .47 | .30 | .30 | ||||||||||||||||
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets
|
.32 | .40 | .31 | .19 | .19 | ||||||||||||||||
Net loans charged off as a percent of average
loans
|
.20 | .08 | .05 | .05 | .05 |
(1) | Excludes merger and restructuring expenses of $7.1 million, or $.30 diluted earnings per share, on an after-tax basis incurred in 2001. |
(2) | Adjusted for stock dividends and stock splits. |
(3) | Total operating expenses, excluding merger and restructuring expenses of $9.2 million in 2001, divided by the sum of net interest income (fully taxable equivalent) and noninterest income. |
The Corporation is a financial holding company with its business concentrated in a single industry segment commercial banking. The Corporation, through its bank subsidiaries, offers a full range of commercial banking services. These banking services include accepting deposits, business and personal checking accounts, savings and individual retirement accounts, time deposit instruments, electronically accessed banking products, residential and commercial real estate financing, commercial lending, consumer financing, debit cards, safe deposit box services, money transfer services, automated teller machines, access to insurance products and corporate and personal trust services. The Corporation also has a data processing subsidiary. This subsidiary provides data processing services to the majority of the Corporations subsidiary banks and to outside customers. The data processing services provided to the Corporations subsidiaries represented 92% of total revenue of the data processing subsidiary in 2002, 90% in 2001 and 89% in 2000.
The principal markets for the Corporations commercial banking services are communities within Michigan in which the Corporations subsidiaries are located and the areas immediately surrounding these communities. As of December 31, 2002, the Corporation operated three regional subsidiary banks: Chemical Bank and Trust Company, headquartered in Midland, Michigan; Chemical Bank Shoreline, headquartered in Benton Harbor, Michigan; and Chemical Bank West, headquartered in Grand Rapids, Michigan. Together, they serve 86 communities through 129 banking offices and 2 loan origination offices located in 32 counties across Michigans lower peninsula. In addition to its banking offices, the Corporation operated 137 automated teller machines, both on and off bank premises.
The principal sources of revenues for the Corporation are interest and fees on loans, which accounted for 63% of total revenues in 2002, 64% of total revenues in 2001 and 62% of total revenues in 2000. Interest on investment securities is also a significant source of revenue, accounting for 21% of total revenues in 2002 and 2001 and 24% of total revenues in 2000. Chemical Bank and Trust Company, the Corporations largest subsidiary and lead bank, represented 38% of total loans and 46% of total deposits of the Corporation at December 31, 2002.
The following discussion and analysis is intended to cover the significant factors affecting the Corporations consolidated statements of financial position and income included in this report. It is designed to provide shareholders with a more comprehensive review of the consolidated operating results and financial position of the Corporation than could be obtained from an examination of the financial statements alone.
On December 9, 2002, the Corporation declared a five percent stock dividend that was paid January 24, 2003 to shareholders of record on January 6, 2003. All per share amounts and shares outstanding have been adjusted for this stock dividend.
Application of Critical Accounting Policies
The most significant accounting policies followed by the Corporation are presented in Note A to the consolidated financial statements. These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other notes to the consolidated financial statements and in Managements Discussion and Analysis, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the consolidated financial statements and how those values are determined. Based on the valuation techniques used and the sensitivity of financial statement amounts to the methods, estimates and assumptions underlying those amounts, management has identified the determination of the allowance for loan losses to be the accounting area that requires the most subjective
or complex judgments, and as such, could be most subject to revision as new information becomes available.
The allowance for loan losses represents managements estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Determining the amount of the allowance for loan losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because it requires significant judgment and the use of estimates related to the amount and timing of expected cash flows on impaired loans, estimated losses on pools of homogeneous loans based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends and conditions, all of which may be susceptible to significant change. The loan portfolio also represents the largest asset type on the consolidated statement of financial position. Note A to the consolidated financial statements describes the methodology used to determine the allowance for loan losses. In addition, a discussion of the factors driving changes in the amount of the allowance for loan losses is included in the Provision and Allowance for Loan Losses section of Managements Discussion and Analysis.
Mergers, Acquisitions and Consolidations
On September 14, 2001, the Corporation acquired Bank West Financial Corporation (BWFC). BWFC was the parent company of Bank West, a Michigan stock savings bank with five full-service branches and one loan production office in Kent and Ottawa counties in Michigan. The purchase added approximately $300 million in total assets, $232 million in total loans and $194 million in total deposits as of the date of acquisition, for which the Corporation paid a premium of $7.3 million. Bank West was merged into the Corporations existing subsidiary, Chemical Bank West. The Corporation exchanged $29.2 million in cash for all of the outstanding stock of BWFC.
On July 13, 2001, the Corporation acquired four branch banking offices from Fifth Third Bank and Old Kent Bank in Holland, Zeeland, Grand Haven and Fremont, Michigan. The purchase of the four branch banking offices added total deposits of approximately $144 million and total loans of $97 million as of the date of acquisition, for which the Corporation paid a premium of $15.3 million. The offices in Holland, Zeeland and Grand Haven are being operated as branches of Chemical Bank Shoreline, and Chemical Bank West is operating the office in Fremont.
The acquisitions of the four branches and BWFC in 2001 were accounted for by the purchase method of accounting; therefore, the financial results of these operations are included from their respective acquisition dates, with no restatement of prior period amounts.
On January 9, 2001, the Corporation merged with Shoreline Financial Corporation (Shoreline), a one-bank holding company headquartered in Benton Harbor, Michigan and parent company of Shoreline Bank. As of the effective date of the transaction, Shoreline had total assets of approximately $1.1 billion, total deposits of approximately $.8 billion and total loans of approximately $.8 billion. The Corporation is operating Shoreline Bank through a separate subsidiary of the Corporation, Chemical Bank Shoreline, with its headquarters in Benton Harbor. The Corporation issued approximately 8.2 million shares of common stock for all of the outstanding stock of Shoreline. The transaction was accounted for as a pooling of interests business combination and, therefore, all prior period amounts included in the consolidated financial statements were restated to include Shoreline as if it had always been part of the Corporation.
On December 31, 2000, the Corporation consolidated nine of its then ten subsidiary banks into two; Chemical Bank and Trust Company and Chemical Bank West. Chemical Bank South, headquartered in Marshall, Michigan remained a separate subsidiary until October 26, 2001 when it was consolidated into Chemical Bank Shoreline.
In conjunction with the merger with Shoreline and the internal consolidations, the Corporation recognized $9.2 million ($7.1 million on an after-tax basis) of merger and restructuring expenses during the first quarter of 2001. The term net operating income utilized in this report is defined as net income before the impact of the after-tax $7.1 million of merger and restructuring expenses. Net operating income is a measure not defined under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
On March 24, 2000, the Corporation acquired two branch banking offices from Old Kent Bank located in Evart and Morrice, Michigan. The branches had total deposits of approximately $15 million and $10 million, respectively, as of that date, for which the Corporation paid a premium of approximately $1.7 million. The offices became branch offices of existing bank subsidiaries. The transaction was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting.
TABLE 1. FIVE-YEAR INCOME STATEMENT TAX EQUIVALENT BASIS* AS A PERCENTAGE OF AVERAGE TOTAL ASSETS
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans
|
4.41 | % | 5.05 | % | 4.93 | % | 4.62 | % | 4.72 | % | ||||||||||||
Interest on investment securities
|
1.53 | 1.69 | 1.93 | 2.01 | 2.09 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest on short-term investments
|
.08 | .16 | .26 | .17 | .26 | |||||||||||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME
|
6.02 | 6.90 | 7.12 | 6.80 | 7.07 | |||||||||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest on deposits
|
1.57 | 2.47 | 2.84 | 2.57 | 2.86 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest on FHLB borrowings
|
.25 | .23 | .22 | .16 | .13 | |||||||||||||||||
Interest on other borrowings
short-term
|
.03 | .08 | .14 | .09 | .08 | |||||||||||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE
|
1.85 | 2.78 | 3.20 | 2.82 | 3.07 | |||||||||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME
|
4.17 | 4.12 | 3.92 | 3.98 | 4.00 | |||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
.11 | .06 | .05 | .03 | .06 | |||||||||||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Service charges and fees
|
.60 | .55 | .54 | .50 | .45 | |||||||||||||||||
Trust services revenue
|
.18 | .20 | .23 | .22 | .20 | |||||||||||||||||
Mortgage banking revenue
|
.21 | .20 | .06 | .08 | .12 | |||||||||||||||||
Other
|
(.01 | ) | .04 | .02 | .04 | .10 | ||||||||||||||||
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME
|
.98 | .99 | .85 | .84 | .87 | |||||||||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and benefits
|
1.53 | 1.50 | 1.52 | 1.50 | 1.52 | |||||||||||||||||
Occupancy
|
.21 | .21 | .21 | .22 | .22 | |||||||||||||||||
Equipment
|
.24 | .24 | .21 | .20 | .19 | |||||||||||||||||
Merger and restructuring expenses
|
| .29 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Other
|
.66 | .70 | .67 | .68 | .71 | |||||||||||||||||
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
|
2.64 | 2.94 | 2.61 | 2.60 | 2.64 | |||||||||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
2.40 | 2.11 | 2.11 | 2.19 | 2.17 | |||||||||||||||||
Federal income taxes
|
.79 | .70 | .66 | .69 | .67 | |||||||||||||||||
Tax equivalent adjustment
|
.06 | .08 | .09 | .09 | .09 | |||||||||||||||||
NET INCOME
|
1.55 | % | 1.33 | % | 1.36 | % | 1.41 | % | 1.41 | % | ||||||||||||
AVERAGE TOTAL ASSETS In thousands
|
$ | 3,539,138 | $ | 3,213,561 | $ | 3,000,505 | $ | 2,868,323 | $ | 2,712,472 | ||||||||||||
* | Taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 35%. |
Net Income
The Corporation incurred pre-tax merger and restructuring expenses of $9.2 million ($7.1 million after-tax) in 2001. The expenses were incurred in connection with the merger between the Corporation and Shoreline and the consolidation of nine of the Corporations subsidiary banks into two.
The Corporation defined net operating income in 2001 as net income before the impact of the merger and restructuring expenses of $7.1 million on an after-tax basis. Net operating income in 2001 was $49.8 million, or $2.10 per diluted share. Net income in 2002 compared to net operating income in 2001 was up $5.1 million, or 10.3%. Net operating income per share has increased at an average annual compound rate of 9.6% during the five-year period ended December 31, 2002.
The Corporations return on average assets, based on net operating income, was 1.55% in both 2002 and 2001 and 1.36% in 2000. The Corporations return on average shareholders equity, based on net operating income, was 13.5% in both 2002 and 2001 and 12.0% in 2000.
Deposits
2002 was primarily attributable to the purchase acquisitions occurring in the second half of 2001. The Corporation experienced slight changes in the mix of its deposits during 2002 as a result of the significant decrease in overall market interest rates during both 2001 and 2002. The declining interest rate environment prompted many customers to transfer funds from their maturing certificates of deposit to their savings and money market deposit accounts. As a result, time deposits less than $100,000 decreased $81 million, or 9.4%, while savings and money market accounts increased by $124 million, or 9.8%, during the twelve months ended December 31, 2002.
It is the Corporations strategy to develop customer relationships that will drive steady core deposit growth and stability. The Corporation gathers deposits from the local markets of its bank subsidiaries. The Corporation had $18.3 million of brokered deposits as of December 31, 2002, that were obtained as part of the 2001 acquisitions. The Corporation does not intend to seek additional brokered deposits as part of its deposit gathering strategy.
The growth of the Corporations deposits is impacted by competition from other investment products, such as brokerage accounts, mutual funds and various annuity products. These investment products are sold by a wide spectrum of organizations, such as brokerage and insurance companies, as well as by financial institutions.
The Corporations subsidiary banks, through CFC Investment Centers, offer a wide array of mutual funds, annuity products and market securities through alliances with BankMark and FutureShare Financial Services. CFC Investment Centers offer customers a broad spectrum of investment products and services. During 2002, customers purchased $33.8 million of annuity and mutual fund investments through CFC Investment Centers. In addition, the trust department of Chemical Bank and Trust Company offers customers a variety of investment products and services. Two of these products are ChemVest Advantage, which provides customers with professional assistance in allocating their funds among a variety of institutional mutual funds, and ChemSelect-IRA, which allows customers to choose their own asset allocation and risk tolerance among a variety of mutual funds, without any sales charges or transaction fees. At December 31, 2002, these two trust department investment products had balances totaling $30.1 million.
Assets
Cash Dividends
The Corporation has paid regular cash dividends every quarter since it was organized as a bank holding company in 1973. The compound annual growth rate of the Corporations cash dividends per share over the past five- and ten-year periods ended December 31, 2002 was 9.6% and 12.1%, respectively. The earnings of the Corporations subsidiaries are the principal source of funds to pay cash dividends to shareholders. Cash dividends are dependent upon the earnings of the Corporations subsidiaries, as well as capital requirements, regulatory restraints and other factors affecting each of the Corporations subsidiary banks.
The Corporations annual cash dividends per share over the past five years, adjusted for all stock dividends and stock splits, were as follows:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||
Annual Dividend
|
$ | .91 | $ | .87 | $ | .80 | $ | .72 | $ | .67 |
Interest income is the total amount earned on funds invested in loans, investment securities, other interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold. Interest expense is the amount of interest paid on interest-bearing checking accounts and savings and time deposits, as well as on other borrowings short-term and Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings. Net interest income, on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis, is the difference between interest income and interest expense adjusted for the tax benefit received on tax-exempt commercial loans and investment securities. Net interest margin is calculated by dividing net interest income (FTE) by average interest-earning assets. Net interest spread is the difference between the average yield on interest-earning assets and the average cost of interest-bearing liabilities.
Net interest income is influenced by a variety of factors, including changes in the volume of interest-earning assets, changes in the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the proportion of interest-earning assets that are funded by noninterest-bearing liabilities (demand deposits) and equity capital, market rates of interest which are impacted by the national economy, monetary policies of the Federal Reserve Board, and variations in interest sensitivity between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Some of these factors are controlled to a certain extent by management policies and actions. However, conditions beyond managements control also have an impact on changes in net interest income. These
conditions include changes in market interest rates, the strength of credit demand by customers, competition from other financial institutions, the growth of deposit accounts at non-bank financial competitors and the continued growth in equity, mutual fund and annuity investments. Management monitors the Corporations consolidated statement of financial position to reduce the potential adverse impact on net interest income caused by significant changes in interest rates. The Corporations policies in this regard are further discussed in the section titled Interest Rate Risk.
Table 2 presents, for 2002, 2001 and 2000, average daily balances of the Corporations major categories of assets and liabilities, interest income and expense on a fully taxable equivalent (FTE) basis, average interest rates earned and paid on the assets and liabilities, net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin.
Table 3 allocates the dollar change in net interest income (FTE) between the portion attributable to changes in the average volume of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities, including changes in the mix of assets and liabilities, and changes in average interest rates earned and paid.
During 2002, short-term interest rates remained constant until November when the Federal Reserve Boards Open Market Committee lowered the Discount and Federal Funds rates by 50 basis points. The prime rate declined from 4.75% on January 1, 2002 to 4.25% on December 31, 2002. The net effect of the lower interest rate environment increased net interest margin and net interest spread in 2002 compared to 2001. Net interest margin for 2002 was 4.44%, compared to 4.38% in 2001. Net interest spread for 2002 was 3.94%, compared to 3.62% for 2001. The Corporation is slightly interest liability sensitive, which means that the Corporations interest-bearing liabilities
TABLE 2. AVERAGE BALANCES, TAX EQUIVALENT INTEREST AND EFFECTIVE YIELDS AND RATES* (Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tax | Effective | Tax | Effective | Tax | Effective | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Equivalent | Yield/ | Average | Equivalent | Yield/ | Average | Equivalent | Yield/ | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | Balance | Interest | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans**
|
$ | 2,085,744 | $ | 156,270 | 7.49 | % | $ | 1,996,803 | $ | 162,201 | 8.12 | % | $ | 1,771,306 | $ | 147,811 | 8.34 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities
|
1,014,973 | 49,554 | 4.88 | 828,726 | 49,184 | 5.93 | 853,346 | 52,667 | 6.17 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non-taxable investment securities
|
55,144 | 4,566 | 8.28 | 61,825 | 4,993 | 8.08 | 65,272 | 5,277 | 8.08 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold
|
121,200 | 2,000 | 1.65 | 116,176 | 4,604 | 3.96 | 113,256 | 7,092 | 6.26 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with unaffiliated banks
|
49,050 | 776 | 1.58 | 22,766 | 681 | 2.99 | 9,893 | 623 | 6.30 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-earning assets
|
3,326,111 | 213,166 | 6.41 | 3,026,296 | 221,663 | 7.32 | 2,813,073 | 213,470 | 7.59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
31,098 | 28,644 | 26,393 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks
|
121,499 | 118,312 | 112,142 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises and equipment
|
43,104 | 39,003 | 37,494 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued income and other assets
|
79,522 | 58,594 | 64,189 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 3,539,138 | $ | 3,213,561 | $ | 3,000,505 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
$ | 492,824 | $ | 4,594 | .93 | % | $ | 466,320 | $ | 9,685 | 2.08 | % | $ | 430,743 | $ | 12,453 | 2.89 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits
|
848,908 | 13,538 | 1.59 | 686,511 | 16,729 | 2.44 | 660,098 | 19,027 | 2.88 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits
|
1,035,506 | 37,404 | 3.61 | 1,023,808 | 52,813 | 5.16 | 962,992 | 53,723 | 5.58 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
162,332 | 8,848 | 5.45 | 132,103 | 7,285 | 5.51 | 107,215 | 6,526 | 6.09 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings short term
|
108,469 | 968 | .89 | 101,834 | 2,670 | 2.62 | 88,933 | 4,227 | 4.75 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total interest-bearing liabilities
|
2,648,039 | 65,352 | 2.47 | 2,410,576 | 89,182 | 3.70 | 2,249,981 | 95,956 | 4.27 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing deposits
|
448,737 | 405,841 | 378,121 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total deposits and borrowed funds
|
3,096,776 | 2,816,417 | 2,628,102 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses and other liabilities
|
35,600 | 27,315 | 32,222 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
406,762 | 369,829 | 340,181 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders Equity
|
$ | 3,539,138 | $ | 3,213,561 | $ | 3,000,505 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Spread (Average yield earned minus
average rate paid)
|
3.94 | % | 3.62 | % | 3.32 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Income (FTE)
|
$ | 147,814 | $ | 132,481 | $ | 117,514 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net Interest Margin
(Net interest income (FTE)/ total average interest-earning assets) |
4.44 | % | 4.38 | % | 4.18 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* | Taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 35%. |
** | Nonaccrual loans are included in average balances reported and are included in the calculation of yields. |
(deposits and borrowings) react more quickly to changes in interest rates than its interest-earning assets.
Net interest income (FTE) in 2002 was $147.8 million, up $15.3 million, or 11.6%, over 2001 net interest income (FTE) of $132.5 million. During 2002, the increase in volume and change within the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities resulted in a $10.7 million increase to net interest income (FTE) compared to 2001. During 2002, average interest-earning assets increased $300 million, or 9.9%, to $3.3 billion, while average interest-bearing liabilities increased $237 million, or 9.9%, to $2.6 billion. Average loans increased $89 million, or 4.5%, due to acquisitions. Average taxable investment securities increased $186 million, or 22.5%, primarily due to investing available liquidity. Interest-bearing deposits increased $201 million, or 9.2%, resulting from both acquisitions and internal growth. In addition, the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities declined 123 basis points, while the yield on interest-earning assets declined only 91 basis points, which resulted in a $4.6 million increase to net interest income. Excluding the impact of the 2001 bank and branch acquisitions, net interest income increased approximately 7% during the year ended December 31, 2002 compared to the same time period in 2001. The remaining increase was due to the costs of deposits and other funding sources decreasing by more than the decrease in the yield on interest-earning assets.
Net interest income (FTE) in 2001 was $132.5 million, up $15 million, or 12.7%, over 2000 net interest income (FTE) of $117.5 million. During 2001, the increase in volume and the change within the mix of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities resulted in a $9.9 million increase in net interest income (FTE) compared to 2000. This increase in net interest income (FTE) was primarily attributable to the acquisitions completed during the second half of 2001. In addition, the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities declined 57 basis points, while the yield on interest-earning assets declined only 27 basis points, which resulted in a $5.1 million increase in net interest income. Net interest margin in 2001 improved to 4.38% from 4.18% in 2000. Net interest spread also improved to 3.62% for 2001 from 3.32% for 2000.
TABLE 3. VOLUME AND RATE VARIANCE ANALYSIS* (In thousands)
2002 Compared to 2001 | 2001 Compared to 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Increase (decrease) | Increase (decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
due to changes in | due to changes in | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Combined | Combined | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | Increase | Average | Average | Increase | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Volume | Yield/Rate | (Decrease) | Volume | Yield/Rate | (Decrease) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
CHANGES IN INTEREST INCOME ON
INTEREST-EARNING ASSETS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
|
$ | 7,013 | $ | (12,944 | ) | $ | (5,931 | ) | $ | 18,575 | $ | (4,185 | ) | $ | 14,390 | |||||||||||||
Taxable investment securities
|
9,941 | (9,571 | ) | 370 | (1,592 | ) | (1,891 | ) | (3,483 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-taxable investment securities
|
(549 | ) | 122 | (427 | ) | (286 | ) | 2 | (284 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal funds sold
|
191 | (2,795 | ) | (2,604 | ) | 178 | (2,666 | ) | (2,488 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with unaffiliated banks
|
523 | (428 | ) | 95 | 494 | (436 | ) | 58 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total change in interest income on interest-
earning assets
|
17,119 | (25,616 | ) | (8,497 | ) | 17,369 | (9,176 | ) | 8,193 | |||||||||||||||||||
CHANGES IN INTEREST EXPENSE ON
INTEREST-BEARING LIABILITIES: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing demand deposits
|
526 | (5,617 | ) | (5,091 | ) | 1,536 | (4,304 | ) | (2,768 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Savings deposits
|
3,429 | (6,620 | ) | (3,191 | ) | 804 | (3,102 | ) | (2,298 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Time deposits
|
598 | (16,007 | ) | (15,409 | ) | 3,166 | (4,076 | ) | (910 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
1,656 | (93 | ) | 1,563 | 1,401 | (642 | ) | 759 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Other borrowings - short term
|
160 | (1,862 | ) | (1,702 | ) | 545 | (2,102 | ) | (1,557 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Total change in interest expense on interest-
bearing liabilities
|
6,369 | (30,199 | ) | (23,830 | ) | 7,452 | (14,226 | ) | (6,774 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL INCREASE IN NET
INTEREST INCOME (FTE) |
$ | 10,750 | $ | 4,583 | $ | 15,333 | $ | 9,917 | $ | 5,050 | $ | 14,967 | ||||||||||||||||
* | Taxable equivalent basis using a federal income tax rate of 35%. |
The Corporations bank subsidiaries are
full-service community banks and, therefore, the acceptance and
management of credit risk is an integral part of the
Corporations business. The Corporation maintains a
conservative loan policy and strict credit underwriting
standards. These standards include the granting
of loans generally only within the Corporations market
areas. The Corporations lending markets generally consist
of small communities across the middle to southern and western
sections of the lower peninsula of Michigan. The Corporation has
no foreign loans or any loans to finance highly leveraged
transactions. The Corporations lending philosophy is
implemented through strong administrative and reporting controls
at the subsidiary bank level, with additional oversight at the
parent company level. The Corporation maintains a centralized
independent loan review function at the parent company level,
which monitors asset quality at each of the Corporations
subsidiary banks.
The Corporation experiences competition for
commercial loans primarily from larger regional banks located
both within and outside of the Corporations market areas,
and from other community banks located within the
Corporations lending markets. The Corporations
competition for residential real estate loans primarily includes
community banks, larger regional banks, savings associations,
credit unions and mortgage companies. The competition for
residential real estate loans has increased over the last few
years as mortgage lending companies have expanded their sales
and marketing efforts. The Corporation experiences competition
for consumer loans mostly from captive automobile finance
companies, larger regional banks, community banks and local
credit unions. The Corporations loan portfolio is
generally diversified geographically, as well as along industry
lines and, therefore, the Corporation believes that its loan
portfolio is reasonably sheltered from material adverse local
economic impact.
Total loans at December 31, 2002 were
$2.08 billion, a decrease of $107 million, or 4.9%,
compared to December 31, 2001. The decline in the loan
portfolio was mainly due to refinances of residential mortgage
loans resulting from the low interest rate environment. The
TABLE 4. SUMMARY
OF LOANS AND LOAN LOSS EXPERIENCE (Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Distribution of Loans:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 327,438 | $ | 332,055 | $ | 287,971 | $ | 289,108 | $ | 401,827 | ||||||||||||||
Real estate construction
|
108,589 | 137,500 | 87,419 | 74,372 | 51,784 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate commercial
|
481,084 | 432,747 | 313,245 | 283,966 | 215,371 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate residential
|
648,286 | 769,272 | 776,545 | 691,830 | 537,441 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
509,789 | 510,967 | 383,450 | 372,294 | 327,029 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loans
|
$ | 2,075,186 | $ | 2,182,541 | $ | 1,848,630 | $ | 1,711,570 | $ | 1,533,452 | ||||||||||||||
Summary of Changes in the Allowance for Loan
Losses:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses at beginning of year
|
$ | 30,994 | $ | 26,883 | $ | 26,174 | $ | 25,954 | $ | 25,136 | ||||||||||||||
Loans charged off:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
(2,345 | ) | (544 | ) | (326 | ) | (260 | ) | (232 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Real estate construction
|
(107 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Real estate commercial
|
| (55 | ) | (5 | ) | | | |||||||||||||||||
Real estate residential
|
(164 | ) | (108 | ) | (155 | ) | (120 | ) | (67 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
(2,214 | ) | (1,427 | ) | (1,024 | ) | (903 | ) | (1,040 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Total loan charge-offs
|
(4,830 | ) | (2,134 | ) | (1,510 | ) | (1,283 | ) | (1,339 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Recoveries of loans previously charged-off:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
329 | 195 | 234 | 145 | 151 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate construction
|
| | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate commercial
|
17 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 10 | |||||||||||||||||||
Real estate residential
|
18 | 23 | 21 | 27 | 65 | |||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
379 | 251 | 367 | 358 | 367 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total loan recoveries
|
743 | 479 | 632 | 540 | 593 | |||||||||||||||||||
Net loan charge-offs
|
(4,087 | ) | (1,655 | ) | (878 | ) | (743 | ) | (746 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
3,765 | 2,004 | 1,587 | 963 | 1,564 | |||||||||||||||||||
Allowance of banks/branches acquired
|
| 3,762 | | | | |||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses at year-end
|
$ | 30,672 | $ | 30,994 | $ | 26,883 | $ | 26,174 | $ | 25,954 | ||||||||||||||
Ratio of net charge-offs during the year to
average loans outstanding
|
.20 | % | .08 | % | .05 | % | .05 | % | .05 | % | ||||||||||||||
Ratio of allowance for loan losses at year-end to
total loans outstanding at year-end
|
1.48 | % | 1.42 | % | 1.45 | % | 1.53 | % | 1.69 | % | ||||||||||||||
Corporation achieved an increase in real estate commercial loans during 2002, although it experienced declines in other loan categories. Real estate construction loans decreased due to the soft economy. Commercial and consumer loan categories declined slightly from the prior year also due to the soft economy and increased competition. In 2001, the Corporation achieved an increase in all loan categories except residential real estate, compared to 2000.
Real estate loans include real estate construction loans, real estate commercial loans and residential real estate loans. At December 31, 2002 and 2001, real estate loans totaled $1.24 billion and $1.34 billion, respectively. Real estate loans decreased $102 million, or 7.6%, in 2002. Real estate loans as a percentage of total loans at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were 59.7%, 61.4% and 63.7%, respectively.
Real estate construction loans are originated for both business and residential properties. These loans often convert to a residential real estate loan at the completion of the construction period. At December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, real estate construction loans as a percentage of total loans were 5.2%, 6.3% and 4.8%, respectively.
Construction lending is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk than one- to four-family residential lending because of the uncertainties of construction, including the possibility of costs exceeding the initial estimates and the need to obtain a tenant or purchaser of the property if it will not be owner-occupied. The Corporation generally attempts to mitigate the risks associated with construction lending by, among other things, lending primarily in its market area, using conservative underwriting guidelines, and closely monitoring the construction process.
Real estate commercial loans increased $48.3 million, or 11.2%, during 2002 to $481.1 million at December 31, 2002. At December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, commercial real estate loans as a percentage of total loans were 23.2%, 19.9% and 16.9%, respectively.
Commercial loans totaled $327.4 million at December 31, 2002, a decrease of $4.6 million, or 1.4%, from total commercial loans at December 31, 2001 of $332.1 million. Commercial loans increased $44 million, or 15.3%, in 2001 compared to 2000, primarily from purchase acquisitions. Commercial loans represented 15.8%, 15.2% and 15.6% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Commercial lending and real estate commercial lending are generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk than one-to four-family residential lending. Such lending typically involves large loan balances concentrated in a single borrower for rental of business properties or for the operation of a business. In addition, the payment experience on loans secured by income-producing properties is typically dependent on the success of the operation of the related project and is typically affected by adverse conditions in the real estate market and in the economy. The Corporation generally attempts to mitigate the risks associated with commercial lending by, among other things, lending primarily in its market area using conservative loan-to-value ratios in the underwriting process.
TABLE 5. COMPARISON OF LOAN MATURITIES AND INTEREST SENSITIVITY (Dollars in thousands)
December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Due In | Due In | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 Year | 1 to 5 | Over 5 | 1 Year | 1 to 5 | Over 5 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
or Less | Years | Years | Total | or Less | Years | Years | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan Maturities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 173,854 | $ | 136,714 | $16,870 | $ | 327,438 | $ | 167,664 | $ | 150,478 | $ | 13,913 | $ | 332,055 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate construction
|
51,121 | 48,125 | 9,343 | 108,589 | 77,150 | 51,745 | 8,605 | 137,500 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate commercial
|
86,909 | 356,724 | 37,451 | 481,084 | 73,784 | 323,923 | 35,040 | 432,747 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 311,884 | $ | 541,563 | $63,664 | $ | 917,111 | $ | 318,598 | $ | 526,146 | $ | 57,558 | $ | 902,302 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Percent of Total
|
34 | % | 59 | % | 7 | % | 100 | % | 35 | % | 58 | % | 7 | % | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest Sensitivity:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Above loans maturing after one year which have: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fixed interest rates
|
$ | 527,216 | 87 | % | $ | 561,973 | 81 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variable interest rates
|
78,011 | 13 | 21,731 | 19 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 605,227 | 100 | % | $ | 583,704 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Residential real estate loans decreased $121 million, or 15.7%, during 2002 to $648 million. Residential real estate loans decreased from the prior year as customers took advantage of the significantly lower interest rate environment to convert their short-term fixed rate loans (balloon type loans) to long-term fixed rate loans that the Corporation generally sells in the secondary market. At December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, residential real estate loans as a percentage of total loans were 31.2%, 35.2% and 42.0%, respectively.
The Corporations residential real estate loans primarily consist of one-to four-family residential loans with original terms of less than fifteen years. The loan-to-value ratio at time of origination is generally 80% or less. Loans with more than an 80% loan-to-value ratio generally require private mortgage insurance.
The Corporations general practice is to sell residential real estate loan originations with maturities of fifteen years and longer in the secondary market. The Corporation sold $501 million of long-term fixed rate residential real estate loans during 2002. This compares with $342 million of residential real estate loans sold during 2001. The increase in loans sold was attributable to the lower overall interest rate environment that prevailed throughout 2002. During the second half of 2002, the Corporation retained in its portfolio $63 million of residential mortgage loan originations with maturities of fifteen years or greater. During 2003, the Corporation expects to hold in its portfolio a portion of the fixed-rate residential real estate loan originations with maturities of fifteen to thirty years.
At December 31, 2002, the Corporation was servicing $543 million of residential mortgage loans that had been originated by the Corporation in its market areas and subsequently sold in the secondary mortgage market. At December 31, 2001, the Corporation serviced for others approximately $433 million of residential mortgages.
Consumer loans totaled $510 million at December 31, 2002, compared to $511 million at December 31, 2001 and $383 million at December 31, 2000. The slight decrease during 2002 was primarily attributable to the competition from captive auto finance companies, which offered interest rates as low as zero percent on new car purchases. Consumer loans decreased by $1.2 million, or .2%, during 2002 and increased by $128 million, or 33.3%, during 2001. The increase in 2001 was attributable to the purchase acquisitions and consumer loan promotions. These promotions were limited time offers of consumer loans at special interest rates to qualifying borrowers. The Corporation generally utilizes loan promotions to generate growth in consumer loans each year. Consumer loans represented 24.6%, 23.4% and 20.7% of total loans outstanding at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Consumer loans generally have shorter terms than mortgage loans but generally involve more credit risk than one- to four-family residential lending because of the type and nature of the collateral. Collateral values, particularly those of automobiles, can be negatively impacted by a slow economy. Consumer lending collections are dependent on the borrowers continuing financial stability, and thus are more likely to be affected by adverse personal situations.
Table 5 presents the maturity distribution of commercial, real estate construction and real estate commercial loans. These loans represented 44.2% of total loans at December 31, 2002 and 41.3% of total loans at December 31, 2001. The percentage of these loans maturing within one year was 34% at December 31, 2002, compared with 35% at December 31, 2001. The percentage of these loans maturing beyond five years remained low at 7% both at December 31, 2002 and 2001. Of those loans with maturities beyond one year, the percentage of loans with variable interest rates was 13% at December 31, 2002, compared to 19% at December 31, 2001. The decrease in variable interest rate loans was due to borrowers refinancing to fixed rate loans in the low interest rate environment.
The continued low percentage of loans maturing within one year is due to the growth in real estate commercial loans. Real estate commercial loans are generally written as balloon mortgages at fixed interest rates for balloon time periods ranging from three to eight years.
TABLE 6. NONPERFORMING ASSETS (Dollars in thousands)
December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||
Nonaccrual loans*
|
$ | 4,859 | $ | 6,897 | $ | 7,268 | $ | 3,078 | $ | 2,865 | ||||||||||||
Accruing loans contractually past due
90 days or more as to interest or principal payments
|
2,422 | 6,181 | 1,406 | 1,207 | 1,743 | |||||||||||||||||
Restructured loans
|
| | 17 | 821 | | |||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming loans
|
7,281 | 13,078 | 8,691 | 5,106 | 4,608 | |||||||||||||||||
Repossessed assets and other real estate
|
4,298 | 728 | 831 | 328 | 707 | |||||||||||||||||
Total nonperforming assets
|
$ | 11,579 | $ | 13,806 | $ | 9,522 | $ | 5,434 | $ | 5,315 | ||||||||||||
Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans
|
.35 | % | .60 | % | .47 | % | .30 | % | .30 | % | ||||||||||||
Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets
|
.32 | % | .40 | % | .31 | % | .19 | % | .19 | % | ||||||||||||
* | Interest income totaling $135,000 was recorded on the nonaccrual loans in 2002. Additional interest income of $274,000 would have been recorded during 2002 on these loans had they been current in accordance with their original terms. |
A five-year history of nonperforming assets is presented in Table 6. Nonperforming assets are comprised of loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis, accruing loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, other loans whose terms have been restructured to provide for a reduction or deferral of interest or principal because of deterioration in the financial position of the borrower and repossessed assets and other real estate.
The Corporations practice is to immediately charge to the allowance for loan losses specifically identified credit losses. This determination is made for each loan at the time of transfer to nonperforming status, after giving consideration to collateral value and the borrowers ability to repay the loan principal. Nonaccrual loans were $4.9 million at December 31, 2002, compared to $6.9 million at December 31, 2001 and $7.3 million at December 31, 2000. Nonaccrual loans as a percentage of total loans were .23% at December 31, 2002, ..32% at December 31, 2001 and .39% at December 31, 2000.
Accruing loans past due 90 days or more were $2.4 million at December 31, 2002, compared to $6.2 million at December 31, 2001 and $1.4 million at December 31, 2000. The $3.8 million decrease in these loans during 2002 was primarily attributable to a reduction in commercial and real estate commercial loans. There were no restructured loans at December 31, 2002 and 2001. Restructured loans were $.02 million at December 31, 2000.
Total nonperforming loans were $7.3 million, or .35% of total loans, at December 31, 2002, compared to $13.1 million, or .60% of total loans, at December 31, 2001 and $8.7 million, or .47% of total loans, at December 31, 2000. The level and composition of nonperforming loans are affected by economic conditions in the Corporations local markets.
Total repossessed assets and other real estate totaled $4.3 million at December 31, 2002, and consisted of commercial real estate of $3.1 million, residential real estate of $.9 million and other repossessions, mostly automobiles, of $.3 million. Total repossessed assets and other real estate totaled $.7 million at December 31, 2001 and consisted of residential real estate of $.5 million and other repossessions of $.2 million.
The Corporations policy and related disclosures for impaired loans is as follows: A loan is considered impaired when management determines it is probable that all of the principal and interest due under the contractual terms of the loan will not be collected. In most instances, the impairment is measured based on the fair market value of the underlying collateral. Impairment may also be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate. A portion of the allowance for loan losses may be allocated to impaired loans.
During the first quarter of 2002, the Corporation changed its methodology of identifying loans as being of an impaired status. Previously, the Corporation analyzed all nonaccrual commercial and real estate commercial loans for impairment before determining which loans were impaired. Based on conservative management philosophies, as of January 1, 2002, the Corporation took the position that all nonaccrual commercial and real estate commercial loans are impaired. This change had no effect on the allowance allocated to impaired loans, as the additional loans classified as impaired did not require an impairment allowance as of January 1, 2002.
Impaired loans under the new classification totaled $2.3 million as of December 31, 2002, $5.1 million as of December 31, 2001 and $5.5 million as of December 31, 2000. After analyzing the various components of the
customer relationships and evaluating the underlying collateral of impaired loans, the allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans was as follows: $.8 million as of December 31, 2002, $1.1 million as of December 31, 2001 and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2000. The process of measuring impaired loans and the allocation of the allowance for loan losses requires judgment and estimation; therefore, the eventual outcome may differ from the estimates used on these loans.
The provision for loan losses (provision) is the amount added to the allowance for loan losses (allowance) to absorb loan losses (charge-offs) in the loan portfolio. The allowance is maintained at a level considered by management to be adequate to absorb loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. Management continuously evaluates the allowance to ensure the level is adequate to absorb losses inherent in the loan portfolio. This evaluation is based on a continuous review of the loan portfolio, both individually and by category, and includes consideration of changes in the mix and volume of the loan portfolio, actual loan loss experience, the financial condition of the borrowers, industry and geographical exposures within the portfolio, economic conditions and employment levels of the Corporations local markets, and special factors affecting business sectors. A formal evaluation of the allowance is prepared quarterly to assess the risk in the loan portfolio and to determine the adequacy of the allowance. The Corporations loan review personnel, who are independent of the loan origination function, review this evaluation.
The allowance provides for probable losses that have been identified with specific customer relationships and for probable losses believed to be inherent in the remainder of the loan portfolio but that have not been specifically identified. The allowance for loan losses is comprised of specific allowances (assessed for loans that have known credit weaknesses), general allowances based on assigned risk ratings and an unallocated allowance for imprecision in the subjective nature of the specific and general allowance methodology.
The Corporations loan review personnel perform a detailed credit quality review quarterly on large commercial loans that have deteriorated below certain levels of credit risk. A specific portion of the allowance may be allocated to such loans based upon this review. Factors contributing to the determination of specific allocations include the financial condition of the borrower, changes in the value of pledged collateral and general economic conditions. The Corporation establishes the general allowance by the application of projected risk percentages to graded commercial and real estate commercial loans by grade categories. In addition, a portion of the general allowance is allocated to all other loans by loan category, based on a defined methodology that has been in use without material change for several years. Allocations to loan categories are developed based on historical loss and past due trends, managements judgment concerning those trends and other relevant factors, including delinquency, default, and loss rates, as well as general economic conditions.
The underlying credit quality of the Corporations residential real estate and consumer loan portfolios is dependent primarily on each borrowers ability to continue to make required loan payments and, in the event a borrower is unable to continue to do so, the value of the collateral, if any, securing the loan. A borrowers ability to pay typically is dependent primarily on employment and other sources of income, which in turn is impacted by general economic conditions, although other factors may also impact a borrowers ability to pay. The evaluation of
TABLE 7. ALLOCATION OF THE
ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Dollars in thousands)
December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Percent | Percent | Percent | Percent | Percent | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
of Loans | of Loans | of Loans | of Loans | of Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
in Each | in Each | in Each | in Each | in Each | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Category | Category | Category | Category | Category | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance | to Total | Allowance | to Total | Allowance | to Total | Allowance | to Total | Allowance | to Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan Type | Amount | Loans | Amount | Loans | Amount | Loans | Amount | Loans | Amount | Loans | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 9,065 | 15.8 | % | $ | 9,562 | 15.2 | % | $ | 9,320 | 15.6 | % | $ | 8,423 | 16.9 | % | $ | 6,819 | 26.2 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate construction
|
1,097 | 5.2 | 1,031 | 6.3 | 769 | 4.8 | 585 | 4.3 | 736 | 3.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate commercial
|
6,167 | 23.2 | 5,817 | 19.9 | 3,381 | 16.9 | 3,047 | 16.6 | 2,564 | 14.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate residential
|
3,563 | 31.2 | 4,026 | 35.2 | 4,882 | 42.0 | 4,511 | 40.4 | 4,263 | 35.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Consumer
|
7,930 | 24.6 | 6,827 | 23.4 | 6,196 | 20.7 | 7,056 | 21.8 | 6,155 | 21.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Not allocated
|
2,850 | 3,731 | 2,335 | 2,552 | 5,417 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 30,672 | 100 | % | $ | 30,994 | 100 | % | $ | 26,883 | 100 | % | $ | 26,174 | 100 | % | $ | 25,954 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||
the appropriate level of the unallocated allowance considers current risk factors that may not be reflected in historical factors used to determine the specific and general allowance allocations. These factors include the volatility of economic conditions. The unallocated reserve is judgmentally determined and generally serves to compensate for the uncertainty in estimating losses, particularly in times of changing economic conditions, and considers the possibility of improper risk ratings and possible over- or under-allocation of specific reserves. The unallocated reserve also considers the lagging impact of historical charge-off ratios in periods where future charge-offs are expected to increase or decrease significantly. In addition, the unallocated reserve considers trends in delinquencies and nonaccrual loans, the changing portfolio mix in terms of collateral, average loan balance, loan growth, the degree of seasoning in the various loan portfolios and loans recently acquired through acquisitions.
The provision for loan losses was $3.77 million in 2002, $2.00 million in 2001, and $1.59 million in 2000. The Corporation experienced net loan charge-offs of $4.09 million in 2002, $1.66 million in 2001 and $.88 million in 2000. The increase in the provision for loan losses in 2002 compared to 2001 was attributable to the increase in net loan charge-offs. Total net loan charge-offs exceeded the provision for loan losses during 2002 due to utilizing $.5 million of the $1.1 million impairment reserve that had been established at December 31, 2001. The Corporations allowance was $31 million at December 31, 2002 and represented 1.48% of total loans, compared to 1.42% at December 31, 2001 and 1.45% at December 31, 2000.
The allocation of the allowance in Table 7 is based upon ranges of estimates and is not intended to imply either limitations on the usage of the allowance or exactness of the specific amounts. The entire allowance is available to absorb any future loan charge-offs without regard to the categories in which the loan losses are classified. During 2002, the following changes in loan mix occurred: commercial real estate loans increased $48.3 million, or 11.2%, while residential real estate loans decreased $121 million, or 15.7%. Accordingly, a greater amount of the allowance, on a percentage basis, was allocated to real estate commercial loans, while a smaller amount of the allowance was allocated to residential real estate loans than in the prior year. Also, during 2002, the following changes in loan quality occurred: consumer loan net charge-offs were $1.8 million compared to $1.2 million during 2001. Accordingly, a greater amount of the allowance, on a percentage basis, was allocated to consumer loans than in the prior year to reflect the higher relative credit risk as experienced through higher loan losses. Nonperforming commercial loans decreased from $6.0 million at December 31, 2001 to $1.7 million at December 31, 2002. Accordingly, a smaller amount of the allowance, on a percentage basis, was allocated to commercial loans than in the prior year.
Noninterest income totaled $34.53 million in 2002, $31.87 million in 2001 and $25.50 million in 2000. Noninterest income increased $2.7 million, or 8.3%, in 2002 and $6.4 million, or 25%, in 2001 over the prior year. Noninterest income as a percentage of net revenue (net interest income plus noninterest income) was 19.2% in 2002, compared to 19.7% in 2001 and 18.2% in 2000.
The following schedule includes the major components of noninterest income during the past three years.
Noninterest Income (In thousands)
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
$ | 14,002 | $ | 10,838 | $ | 10,133 | ||||||||
Trust services revenue
|
6,405 | 6,544 | 6,865 | |||||||||||
Other fees for customer services
|
2,561 | 2,501 | 2,615 | |||||||||||
ATM network user fees
|
2,199 | 2,458 | 2,184 | |||||||||||
Investment fees and insurance commissions
|
2,371 | 2,198 | 1,715 | |||||||||||
Mortgage banking revenue
|
7,513 | 6,370 | 1,704 | |||||||||||
Investment securities gains (losses)
|
(768 | ) | 530 | (58 | ) | |||||||||
Other
|
251 | 434 | 337 | |||||||||||
Total Noninterest Income
|
$ | 34,534 | $ | 31,873 | $ | 25,495 | ||||||||
The Corporation realized increases in four major categories of noninterest income, with the increase in service charges on deposit accounts and mortgage banking revenue accounting for the majority of the overall increase in noninterest income. Service charges on deposit accounts were $14.0 million in 2002, $10.8 million in 2001 and $10.1 million in 2000. The increases of $3.2 million, or 29.2%, in 2002 and $.7 million, or 7%, in 2001 were primarily attributable to a higher level of customer activity in areas where fees and service charges are applicable.
Mortgage banking revenue was up $1.1 million, or 17.9%, to $7.5 million, as customers took advantage of the lower interest rate environment on long-term fixed rate mortgages to either refinance their existing mortgages or purchase new homes. The Corporation generally sells the majority of its long-term fixed interest rate residential real estate loan originations in the secondary mortgage market as part of its interest rate risk management strategy. During 2002, the
Corporation sold $501 million of residential real estate loans in the secondary market, compared to $342 million in 2001. Both 2002 and 2001 volumes represent a significant increase over historical volumes of sold loans. The increase in mortgage banking gains and origination fees were partially offset by higher amortization of servicing rights, as well as a $613,000 impairment provision recorded to reflect the decline in the estimated fair value of mortgage servicing rights compared to the recorded book value. The decline in the estimated fair value of mortgage servicing rights was due to the continued decline in overall market interest rates for residential mortgage loans and the corresponding increase in prepayments of loans serviced for others. The book value of mortgage servicing rights was $2.5 million and $2.8 million as of December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001, respectively.
Trust services revenue was $6.4 million in 2002, $6.5 million in 2001 and $6.9 million in 2000. Trust services revenue decreased $139,000, or 2.1%, in 2002, as the slowing economy impacted the valuations of assets under management, on which the calculations of management fees are based.
Net investment securities gains decreased by $1.3 million in 2002, primarily due to $829,000 in recorded losses on equity securities. As part of this amount, the Corporation recorded a $472,000 write-down to market value of certain equity securities, as the Corporation projected that the decline in the market value of these securities was other than temporary. The equity securities portfolio as of December 31, 2002 consisted of $2.5 million of common stocks of various publicly traded entities, $15.9 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock and $1.2 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock.
Noninterest income from all other sources, which includes other fees for customer services, ATM network user fees, investment fees and insurance commissions and other was $7.4 million in 2002, $7.6 million in 2001 and $6.9 million in 2000. The decrease of $.2 million, or 2.8%, in 2002 was primarily attributable to a decline in ATM network user fees.
Total operating expenses were $93.5 million in 2002, $94.6 million in 2001, and $78.3 million in 2000.
The following schedule includes the major categories of operating expenses during the past three years.
Total operating expense as a percentage of total average assets was 2.64% in 2002, compared to 2.94% in 2001. Excluding the $9.2 million of merger and restructuring expenses, total operating expense as a percentage of total average assets was 2.65% in 2001.
Operating Expenses (Dollars in thousands)
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Salaries
|
$ | 43,258 | $ | 38,956 | $ | 36,156 | ||||||||
Employee benefits
|
10,910 | 9,302 | 9,316 | |||||||||||
Occupancy
|
7,590 | 6,898 | 6,414 | |||||||||||
Equipment
|
8,391 | 7,722 | 6,405 | |||||||||||
Postage and courier
|
2,814 | 2,154 | 2,034 | |||||||||||
Stationery and supplies
|
1,932 | 1,800 | 1,846 | |||||||||||
Professional fees
|
3,571 | 3,886 | 3,995 | |||||||||||
Michigan single business tax
|
2,788 | 2,036 | 1,425 | |||||||||||
Advertising, marketing, and public relations
|
2,264 | 1,865 | 1,522 | |||||||||||
Intangible asset amortization
|
1,954 | 3,325 | 2,162 | |||||||||||
Telephone
|
1,927 | 1,718 | 1,562 | |||||||||||
Merger and restructuring expenses
|
| 9,167 | | |||||||||||
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC)
premiums
|
496 | 485 | 493 | |||||||||||
Other
|
5,631 | 5,283 | 4,964 | |||||||||||
Total Operating Expenses
|
$ | 93,526 | $ | 94,597 | $ | 78,294 | ||||||||
Full-time equivalent staff (at December 31)
|
1,412 | 1,427 | 1,278 | |||||||||||
Efficiency ratio(1)
|
51 | % | 52 | % | 55 | % | ||||||||
(1) | Total operating expenses, excluding merger and restructuring expenses of $9.2 million in 2001, divided by the sum of net interest income (FTE) and noninterest income. |
Salaries, wages and employee benefits remain the largest component of operating expenses. These expenses totaled $54.2 million in 2002, $48.3 million in 2001 and $45.5 million in 2000. Approximately 45% of the 12.2% increase in total personnel costs for 2002 over 2001 was due to salaries, wages and employee benefits attributable to the 2001 purchase acquisitions that only impacted compensation and benefits expense during 2001 from their respective acquisition dates, versus the entire year in 2002. In addition, pension expense increased by $1.2 million, or 140%, in 2002 compared to 2001 due primarily to more participants in the Corporations pension plan as a result of acquisitions in 2001, and a lower than previously projected actual return on pension plan assets. Personnel expenses as a percentage of total operating expenses were 57.9% in 2002, 51.0% in 2001 (56.5%, excluding the $9.2 million of merger and restructuring expenses from total operating expenses), and 58.1% in 2000.
Occupancy and equipment expenses totaled $16.0 million in 2002, $14.6 million in 2001 and $12.8 million in 2000. Approximately one-half of the increase in occupancy and equipment expenses of $1.4 million, or 9.3%, was due to increased costs attributable to the branch and bank purchases completed during the second half of 2001. Depreciation expense was $5.8 million, $5.1 million and $4.3 million in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Other categories of operating expenses include a wide array of expenses, including postage, supplies, professional fees, Michigan single business tax, advertising and marketing expenses, intangible asset amortization, telephone costs, FDIC premiums and miscellaneous other expenses. These other operating expenses totaled $23.4 million in 2002, $22.5 million in 2001 (excluding the $9.2 million of merger and restructuring expenses) and $20.0 million in 2000. The increase in these expenses in 2002 was primarily attributable to increased costs due to the branch and bank purchases, partially offset by lower intangible asset amortization and lower professional fees.
The Corporations effective federal income tax rate was 33.7% in 2002, 34.6% in 2001 and 32.6% in 2000. The changes in the Corporations effective federal income tax rate reflect the changes each year in the proportion of interest income exempt from federal taxation, nondeductible interest expense, other nondeductible expenses relative to pretax income and tax credits. The higher effective rate in 2001 was due to the impact of the nondeductible portion of the $9.2 million of merger and restructuring expense incurred during 2001.
Tax-exempt income (FTE), net of related nondeductible interest expense, totaled $6.0 million for 2002, $7.4 million for 2001 and $8.1 for 2000. Tax-exempt income (FTE) as a percentage of total interest income (FTE) was 2.8%, 3.3% and 3.8% in 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
Income before income taxes (FTE) was $85.06 million in 2002, $67.75 million in 2001 and $63.13 million in 2000.
The Corporation manages its liquidity to ensure that it has the ability to meet the cash withdrawal needs of its depositors, provide funds for borrowers and at the same time ensure that the Corporations own cash requirements are met. The Corporation accomplishes these goals through the management of liquidity at two levels the parent company and the bank subsidiaries.
During the three-year period ended December 31, 2002, the parent companys primary source of funds was subsidiary dividends. The parent company manages its liquidity position to provide the cash necessary to pay dividends to shareholders, invest in subsidiaries, enter new banking
TABLE 8. MATURITIES AND YIELDS* OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES AT DECEMBER 31, 2002 (Dollars in thousands)
Maturity** | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
After One | After Five | Total | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Within | but Within | but Within | After | Carrying | Market | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
One Year | Five Years | Ten Years | Ten Years | Value | Value | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | Amount | Yield | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Available for Sale:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agencies
|
$ | 128,292 | 5.73 | % | $ | 460,888 | 4.08 | % | $ | 1,003 | 8.00 | % | $ | | | % | $ | 590,183 | 4.19 | % | $ | 590,183 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
|
208 | 5.24 | 7,962 | 5.86 | 7,735 | 5.30 | 3,573 | 5.40 | 19,478 | 5.45 | 19,478 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
4 | 2.02 | 59,307 | 3.66 | 33,880 | 4.48 | 35,693 | 6.18 | 128,884 | 5.34 | 128,884 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
| | 540 | 3.19 | 87 | 4.77 | 13,031 | 3.78 | 13,658 | 3.78 | 13,658 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities
|
10,661 | 6.35 | 75,667 | 4.66 | | | | | 86,328 | 4.87 | 86,328 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Equity securities
|
| | | | | | 20,213 | 5.15 | 20,213 | 5.15 | 20,213 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Securities Available for Sale
|
139,165 | 5.78 | 604,364 | 4.09 | 42,705 | 4.71 | 72,510 | 5.53 | 858,744 | 4.74 | 858,744 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Held to Maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agencies
|
49,621 | 4.15 | 154,801 | 3.71 | | | | | 204,422 | 3.73 | 209,711 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
|
6,242 | 7.50 | 22,221 | 6.73 | 10,271 | 8.15 | 2,275 | 7.88 | 41,009 | 7.58 | 42,868 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
| | 129 | 8.21 | 747 | 8.71 | 4,806 | 8.48 | 5,682 | 8.49 | 6,272 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other debt securities
|
12,245 | 7.01 | | | 2,454 | 7.14 | 3,426 | 5.39 | 18,125 | 6.00 | 18,380 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Securities Held to Maturity
|
68,108 | 5.24 | 177,151 | 4.16 | 13,472 | 7.99 | 10,507 | 7.60 | 269,238 | 5.61 | 277,231 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Investment Securities
|
$ | 207,273 | 5.62 | % | $ | 781,515 | 4.11 | % | $ | 56,177 | 5.49 | % | $ | 83,017 | 5.82 | % | $ | 1,127,982 | 4.91 | % | $ | 1,135,975 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
* | Yields are weighted by amount and time to contractual maturity, are on a taxable equivalent basis using a 35% federal income tax rate and are based on amortized cost. |
** | Based on final contractual maturity. |
markets, pursue investment opportunities and satisfy other operating requirements.
Federal and state banking laws place certain restrictions on the amount of dividends that a bank may pay to its parent company. Such restrictions have not had, and are not expected to have, any material effect on the Corporations ability to meet its cash obligations or impede its ability to manage its liquidity needs. As of January 1, 2003, the Corporations bank subsidiaries could pay dividends totaling $56.4 million to the parent company and remain well capitalized under the regulatory risk-based capital guidelines, without obtaining regulatory approval. In addition to the funds available from subsidiaries, the parent company had $42.2 million in cash and cash equivalents at December 31, 2002.
The subsidiary banks manage liquidity to ensure adequate funds are available to meet the cash flow needs of depositors and borrowers. The subsidiary banks most readily available sources of liquidity are cash and demand deposits due from banks, federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits with unaffiliated banks, investment securities classified as available for sale and investment securities classified as held to maturity maturing within one year. These sources of liquidity are supplemented by new deposits and by loan payments received from customers. At December 31, 2002, the Corporation held $148.1 million of cash and demand deposits due from banks, $69.9 million in federal funds sold, $53.1 million of interest-bearing deposits with unaffiliated banks, $858.7 million in investment securities available for sale and $68.1 million in other investment securities maturing within one year. These short-term assets represented approximately 42% of total deposits at December 31, 2002.
The Corporations investment portfolio has historically been composed primarily of U.S. Treasury and agency securities, comprising 70%, 72% and 72% of the investment portfolio at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The Corporations investment securities portfolio historically has been very short-term in nature. The average life of the investment securities portfolio, which expresses the average number of years that each principal dollar will be outstanding, was 2.2 years as of December 31, 2002. At December 31, 2002, $207.3 million, or 18.4%, of the Corporations investment securities portfolio will mature during 2003, and another $331.8 million, or 29.4%, of the investment securities portfolio will mature during 2004. The combination of the 2003 and 2004 scheduled maturities results in 47.8% of the Corporations investment securities portfolio maturing within two years as of December 31, 2002. Also, approximately $90 million of investment securities with maturities beyond 2003 are callable in 2003. Information about the Corporations investment securities portfolio is summarized in Tables 8, 9 and 10.
TABLE 9. SUMMARY OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES (In thousands)
December 31 | ||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
Available for Sale:
|
||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agencies
|
$ | 590,183 | $ | 541,905 | $ | 476,915 | ||||||
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
|
19,478 | 23,311 | 21,849 | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
128,884 | 97,155 | 97,874 | |||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
13,658 | | | |||||||||
Other debt securities
|
86,328 | 51,418 | 32,413 | |||||||||
Equity securities
|
20,213 | 17,594 | 12,422 | |||||||||
Total Available for Sale
|
858,744 | 731,383 | 641,473 | |||||||||
Held to Maturity:
|
||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agencies
|
204,422 | 125,460 | 152,519 | |||||||||
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
|
41,009 | 42,879 | 46,509 | |||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
5,682 | 11,174 | 15,352 | |||||||||
Other debt securities
|
18,125 | 21,379 | 19,629 | |||||||||
Total Held to Maturity
|
269,238 | 200,892 | 234,009 | |||||||||
Total Investment Securities
|
$ | 1,127,982 | $ | 932,275 | $ | 875,482 | ||||||
TABLE 10. MATURITY ANALYSIS OF INVESTMENT SECURITIES (as a % of total portfolio)
December 31 | ||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Maturity:
|
||||||||||||||
Under 1 year
|
18.4 | % | 24.7 | % | 23.9 | % | ||||||||
1-5 years
|
69.3 | 59.7 | 54.8 | |||||||||||
5-10 years
|
5.0 | 4.0 | 10.0 | |||||||||||
Over 10 years
|
7.3 | 11.6 | 11.3 | |||||||||||
Total
|
100 | % | 100 | % | 100 | % | ||||||||
Table 11 presents the maturity distribution of time deposits of $100,000 or more at the end of each of the last three years. Time deposits of $100,000 or more and the percentage of these deposits to total deposits have remained relatively stable during the past three years. These deposits decreased slightly during 2002 to $208.3 million at December 31, 2002 from $208.6 million at December 31, 2001. These deposits represented 7.2%, 7.5% and 8.8% of total deposits at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The increase in time deposits of $100,000 or more with maturities between six and twelve months was due to a nine-month certificate of deposit promotion and growth in municipal deposits.
TABLE 11. MATURITY DISTRIBUTION OF TIME DEPOSITS OF $100,000 OR MORE (Dollars in thousands)
December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | Amount | Percent | |||||||||||||||||||||
Maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Within 3 months
|
$ | 80,810 | 39 | % | $ | 96,319 | 46 | % | $ | 128,343 | 59 | % | ||||||||||||||
After 3 but within 6 months
|
28,123 | 14 | 32,726 | 16 | 47,637 | 22 | ||||||||||||||||||||
After 6 but within 12 months
|
54,953 | 26 | 32,971 | 16 | 27,008 | 13 | ||||||||||||||||||||
After 12 months
|
44,435 | 21 | 46,546 | 22 | 13,056 | 6 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 208,321 | 100 | % | $ | 208,562 | 100 | % | $ | 216,044 | 100 | % | ||||||||||||||
The Corporation has contractual obligations that require future cash payments. Table 12 summarizes the Corporations non-cancelable contractual obligations and future required minimum payments at December 31, 2002. Refer to Notes I and O to the consolidated financial statements for a further discussion of these contractual obligations.
TABLE 12. CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Minimum Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
$ | 157,393 | $ | 9,020 | $ | 36,609 | $ | 38,715 | $ | 73,049 | ||||||||||||
Capital lease obligations
|
1,114 | 156 | 324 | 342 | 292 | |||||||||||||||||
Operating leases and non-cancelable contracts
|
8,247 | 1,912 | 2,764 | 2,597 | 974 | |||||||||||||||||
Total contractual obligations
|
$ | 166,754 | $ | 11,088 | $ | 39,697 | $ | 41,654 | $ | 74,315 | ||||||||||||
The Corporation also has other commitments that may impact liquidity. Table 13 summarizes the Corporations commitments and expected expiration dates by period at December 31, 2002. Since many of these commitments historically have expired without being drawn upon, the total amount of these commitments does not necessarily represent future cash requirements of the Corporation.
TABLE 13. COMMITMENTS (In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected Expiration Dates by Period | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Less than | More than | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total | 1 year | 1-3 years | 3-5 years | 5 years | ||||||||||||||||||
Unused commitments to extend credit
|
$ | 327,915 | $ | 240,256 | $ | 39,689 | $ | 21,838 | $ | 26,132 | ||||||||||||
Undisbursed loans
|
160,140 | 160,140 | | | | |||||||||||||||||
Standby letters of credit
|
12,899 | 10,939 | | 1,960 | | |||||||||||||||||
Total commitments
|
$ | 500,954 | $ | 411,335 | $ | 39,689 | $ | 23,798 | $ | 26,132 | ||||||||||||
Interest rate risk is the exposure to adverse changes in net interest income due to changes in interest rates. Consistency of the Corporations net interest income is largely dependent upon the effective management of interest rate risk. Interest rate risk arises in the normal course of the Corporations business due to differences in the repricing and maturity characteristics of interest rate sensitive assets and liabilities. Sensitivity of earnings to interest rate changes arises when yields on assets change differently from the interest costs on liabilities. Interest rate sensitivity is determined by the amount of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities repricing within a specific time period and the magnitude by which interest rates change on the various types of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. The management of interest rate sensitivity includes monitoring the maturities and repricing opportunities of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities. Interest rate sensitivity management aims at achieving reasonable stability in both net interest income and the net interest margin through periods of changing interest rates. The Corporations goal is to avoid a significant decrease in net interest income and thus an adverse impact on the profitability of the Corporation in periods of changing interest rates. It is necessary to analyze projections of net interest income based upon the repricing characteristics of the Corporations interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities and the varying magnitude by which interest rates may change on loans, investment securities, interest-bearing deposit accounts and borrowings. The Corporations interest rate sensitivity is managed through policies and risk limits approved by the boards of directors of the Corporation and its subsidiary banks, and an Asset and Liability Committee (ALCO). The ALCO, which is comprised of executive management from various areas of the Corporation including finance, lending, investments and deposit gathering, meets regularly to execute asset and liability management strategies. The ALCO establishes and monitors guidelines on the sensitivity of earnings to changes in interest rates. The goal of the ALCO process is to maintain the Corporations interest rate risk at prudent levels to provide the maximum level of net interest income and minimal impact on earnings from major interest rate changes. The Corporation has not used interest rate swaps or other derivative financial instruments in the management of interest rate risk, other than mandatory forward commitments utilized to partially offset the interest rate risk of interest rate lock commitments on unfunded residential mortgage loans intended to be sold with servicing retained. The Corporation did not have a trading portfolio during the three years ended December 31, 2002.
The primary technique utilized by the Corporation to measure its interest rate risk is simulation analysis. Simulation analysis forecasts the effects on the balance sheet structure and net interest income under a variety of scenarios that incorporate changes in interest rates, changes in the shape of the Treasury yield curve, changes in interest rate relationships, changes in asset and liability mix and loan prepayments.
These forecasts are compared against net interest income projected in a stable interest rate environment. While many assets and liabilities reprice either at maturity or in accordance with their contractual terms, several balance sheet components demonstrate characteristics that require an evaluation to more accurately reflect their repricing behavior. Key assumptions in the simulation analysis include prepayments on loans, probable calls of investment securities, changes in market conditions, loan volumes and loan pricing, deposit sensitivity, and customer preferences. These assumptions are inherently uncertain, subject to fluctuation and revision in a dynamic environment. As a result, the simulation analysis cannot precisely forecast the impact of rising and falling interest rates on net interest income. Actual results will differ from simulated results due to many factors such as changes in balance sheet components, interest rate changes, changes in market conditions and management strategies.
Management performed various simulation analyses throughout 2002. The Corporations interest rate sensitivity is estimated by first forecasting the next twelve months of net interest income under an assumed environment of constant market interest rates. The Corporation then compares various simulation analysis results to the constant interest rate forecast. As of December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Corporation projected the change in net interest income during the next twelve months assuming short-term market interest rates were to uniformly and gradually increase or decrease by up to 200 basis points over the same time period. These projections were based on the Corporations assets and liabilities remaining static over the next twelve months, while factoring in mortgage-backed securities and residential mortgage loan and certain consumer loan prepayments. Mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loan prepayment assumptions were developed from industry averages of prepayment speeds, adjusted for the historical prepayment performance of the Corporations own loans. The Corporations forecasted net interest income sensitivity is monitored by the ALCO within established limits as defined in the interest rate risk limit policy. The Corporations policy limits the adverse change of a 200 basis point increase or decrease in short-term interest rates over the succeeding twelve months to no more than seven and one-half percent of managements most likely net interest income forecast. Throughout 2002, the forecasted interest rate risk exposure was within the Corporations established policy limits.
Summary information about the interest rate risk measures, as described above, at December 31, 2002 and December 31, 2001 is presented below:
Year-End 2002 Twelve Month Projection
Interest Rate Change
Projection (in basis points) |
-200 | -100 | 0 | +100 | +200 | |||||||||||||||
Percent change in net interest income vs.
constant rates
|
1.9% | 1.1% | | (.2)% | (.8)% |
Year-End 2001 Twelve Month Projection
Interest Rate Change
Projection (in basis points) |
-200 | -100 | 0 | +100 | +200 | |||||||||||||||
Percent change in net interest income vs.
constant rates
|
4.8% | 2.5% | | (1.7)% | (2.9)% |
In the normal course of its mortgage loan origination activity, the Corporation issues mortgage commitments with an interest rate lock. The Corporation limits its interest rate risk on the unfunded mortgage commitments through the use of best-efforts and mandatory forward commitments to sell these loans.
The Corporations exposure to market risk for these unfunded commitments and related mandatory forward derivative instruments is not significant. The impact on net income for the year ended December 31, 2002 for these derivative instruments was not material.
Capital provides the foundation for future growth and expansion. Shareholders equity was $430.3 million at December 31, 2002, an increase of $40.9 million, or 10.5%, from total shareholders equity at December 31, 2001. The increase in 2002 was derived primarily from earnings retention of $33.3 million and an increase in the net unrealized gain on securities available for sale of $7.3 million.
The ratio of shareholders equity to total assets was 12.1% at December 31, 2002, compared to 11.2% at December 31, 2001 and 11.7% at December 31, 2000. The Corporations tangible equity ratio was 11.0%, 10.1% and 11.1% at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively. The slight increase in this ratio during 2002 was due to moderate asset growth in proportion to the growth in shareholders equity.
Under the regulatory risk-based capital guidelines in effect for both banks and bank holding companies, minimum capital levels are based upon perceived risk in the Corporations various asset categories. These guidelines assign risk weights to on- and off-balance sheet items in arriving at total risk-adjusted assets. Regulatory capital is divided by the computed total of risk-adjusted assets to arrive at the risk-based capital ratios.
The Corporations capital ratios exceeded the minimum levels prescribed by the Federal Reserve Board at December 31, 2002, as shown in the following table.
Risk-Based | |||||||||||||||
Capital Ratios | |||||||||||||||
Leverage | |||||||||||||||
Ratio | Tier 1 | Total | |||||||||||||
Chemical Financial Corporations capital
ratios
|
11 | % | 17 | % | 19 | % | |||||||||
Regulatory capital ratios-
|
|||||||||||||||
well capitalized definition
|
5 | 6 | 10 | ||||||||||||
Regulatory capital ratios-
|
|||||||||||||||
minimum requirements
|
3 | 4 | 8 |
The Corporations Tier 1 and Total regulatory capital ratios are significantly above the regulatory minimum and well capitalized levels due to the Corporation holding $334 million of investment securities and other assets that are assigned a 0% risk rating, $937 million of investment securities and other assets that are assigned a 20% risk rating, and $748 million of loans secured by first liens on residential real estate properties and other assets that are assigned a 50% risk rating. These three categories of assets represented 57% of the Corporations total assets at December 31, 2002.
At December 31, 2002, all of the Corporations bank subsidiaries exceeded the minimum capital ratios required of a well-capitalized institution, as defined by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act of 1991.
The Corporations philosophy is that it intends to be a family of community banks, which operate under the direction of a corporate and regional bank boards of directors, a holding company management team, and community bank advisory boards of directors. The Corporation is committed to the community banking philosophy. The consolidation of its subsidiary banks into three during 2001 did not change the Corporations strategy of operating with local decision makers who are community minded. The Corporation remains committed to the communities it serves. Community bank advisory boards of directors have been established in the communities where the legal bank charter was merged into a regional subsidiary bank. The purpose of these internal consolidations was to provide the Corporation with operating efficiencies.
The Corporation strives to remain a quality sales and service organization and is dedicated to sustained profitability
through the preservation of the community banking concept in an ever-changing and increasingly competitive environment.
The Corporation believes it has designed its policies regarding asset/liability management, liquidity, lending, investment strategy and expense control to provide for the safety and soundness of the organization, continued earnings growth and the avoidance of wide fluctuations in earnings from one year to the next. This strategy resulted in an increase in net operating income per share of 10.0% over the prior year and a return on assets of 1.55% during 2002.
The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 (Act) eliminated many federal and state law barriers to affiliations among banks, securities firms, insurance companies, and other financial service providers. Companies engaged primarily in insurance activities or securities activities are permitted to acquire banks and bank holding companies such as the Corporation and vice versa.
The Act provides for a more efficient means for financial institutions to offer products and services by creating a financial holding company, or FHC. Banks, securities firms, and insurance companies can affiliate within the FHC structure to offer a broad range of financial products and services. The Corporation became an FHC during 2000.
The legislation is expected, in time, to alter the competitive landscape of the product markets served by the Corporation and may, in the future, also increase the Corporations competition to include larger, more diversified financial companies.
Forward Looking Statements
Risk factors include, but are not limited to, changes in interest rates and interest rate relationships; demand for products and services; the degree of competition by traditional and non-traditional competitors; changes in banking regulations including implementation of the Act and its effects; changes in tax laws; changes in prices, levies and assessments; the impact of technological advances and issues; governmental and regulatory policy changes; the outcomes of pending and future litigation and contingencies; trends in customer behavior as well as their ability to repay loans; changes in the national economy; and the local and global effects of the ongoing war on terrorism and potential future expansion of that war. These are representative of the risk factors that could cause a difference between an ultimate actual outcome and a preceding forward-looking statement.
Important Notice Regarding Delivery of Shareholder Document
Years Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||
INTEREST INCOME
|
|||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans
|
$ | 155,803 | $ | 161,422 | $ | 146,910 | |||||||
Interest on investment securities:
|
|||||||||||||
Taxable
|
49,554 | 49,184 | 52,667 | ||||||||||
Tax-exempt
|
2,911 | 3,359 | 3,572 | ||||||||||
Total interest on securities
|
52,465 | 52,543 | 56,239 | ||||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold
|
2,000 | 4,604 | 7,092 | ||||||||||
Interest on deposits with unaffiliated banks
|
776 | 681 | 623 | ||||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST INCOME
|
211,044 | 219,250 | 210,864 | ||||||||||
INTEREST EXPENSE
|
|||||||||||||
Interest on deposits
|
55,536 | 79,227 | 85,203 | ||||||||||
Interest on Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
8,848 | 7,285 | 6,526 | ||||||||||
Interest on other borrowings short
term
|
968 | 2,670 | 4,227 | ||||||||||
TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE
|
65,352 | 89,182 | 95,956 | ||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME
|
145,692 | 130,068 | 114,908 | ||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
3,765 | 2,004 | 1,587 | ||||||||||
NET INTEREST INCOME after provision for loan
losses
|
141,927 | 128,064 | 113,321 | ||||||||||
NONINTEREST INCOME
|
|||||||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts
|
14,002 | 10,838 | 10,133 | ||||||||||
Trust services revenue
|
6,405 | 6,544 | 6,865 | ||||||||||
Other charges and fees for customer services
|
7,131 | 7,157 | 6,514 | ||||||||||
Mortgage banking revenue
|
7,513 | 6,370 | 1,704 | ||||||||||
Other
|
(517 | ) | 964 | 279 | |||||||||
TOTAL NONINTEREST INCOME
|
34,534 | 31,873 | 25,495 | ||||||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
|||||||||||||
Salaries, wages and employee benefits
|
54,168 | 48,258 | 45,472 | ||||||||||
Occupancy
|
7,590 | 6,898 | 6,414 | ||||||||||
Equipment
|
8,391 | 7,722 | 6,405 | ||||||||||
Merger and restructuring expenses
|
| 9,167 | | ||||||||||
Other
|
23,377 | 22,552 | 20,003 | ||||||||||
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES
|
93,526 | 94,597 | 78,294 | ||||||||||
INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
82,935 | 65,340 | 60,522 | ||||||||||
Federal income taxes
|
27,990 | 22,617 | 19,721 | ||||||||||
NET INCOME
|
$ | 54,945 | $ | 42,723 | $ | 40,801 | |||||||
NET INCOME PER SHARE
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
$2.32 | $1.81 | $1.73 | ||||||||||
Diluted
|
2.31 | 1.80 | 1.72 | ||||||||||
CASH DIVIDENDS PER SHARE
|
.91 | .87 | .80 |
December 31 | ||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||||
Cash and demand deposits due from banks
|
$ | 148,112 | $ | 150,546 | ||||||
Federal funds sold
|
69,900 | 86,800 | ||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits with unaffiliated banks
|
53,135 | 40,591 | ||||||||
Investment securities:
|
||||||||||
Available for sale (at estimated market value)
|
858,744 | 731,383 | ||||||||
Held to maturity (estimated market
value $277,231 in 2002 and $206,212 in 2001)
|
269,238 | 200,892 | ||||||||
Total investment securities
|
1,127,982 | 932,275 | ||||||||
Loans
|
2,075,186 | 2,182,541 | ||||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses
|
30,672 | 30,994 | ||||||||
Net loans
|
2,044,514 | 2,151,547 | ||||||||
Premises and equipment
|
42,767 | 43,143 | ||||||||
Intangible assets
|
40,489 | 42,615 | ||||||||
Accrued income and other assets
|
41,994 | 40,789 | ||||||||
TOTAL ASSETS
|
$ | 3,568,893 | $ | 3,488,306 | ||||||
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
||||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
|
$ | 475,933 | $ | 460,619 | ||||||
Interest-bearing
|
2,371,339 | 2,328,905 | ||||||||
Total deposits
|
2,847,272 | 2,789,524 | ||||||||
Interest payable and other liabilities
|
29,677 | 22,849 | ||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
157,393 | 167,893 | ||||||||
Other borrowings short term
|
104,212 | 118,584 | ||||||||
Total liabilities
|
3,138,554 | 3,098,850 | ||||||||
Shareholders equity:
|
||||||||||
Common stock, $1 par value
|
||||||||||
Authorized 30,000 shares
|
||||||||||
Issued and outstanding 23,684 shares
at December 31, 2002 and 23,640 shares at December 31,
2001
|
23,684 | 22,514 | ||||||||
Surplus
|
325,149 | 290,656 | ||||||||
Retained earnings
|
62,721 | 64,792 | ||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income
|
18,785 | 11,494 | ||||||||
Total shareholders equity
|
430,339 | 389,456 | ||||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
|
$ | 3,568,893 | $ | 3,488,306 | ||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 54,945 | $ | 42,723 | $ | 40,801 | ||||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
3,765 | 2,004 | 1,587 | |||||||||||||
Stock incentive expense
|
| 515 | 208 | |||||||||||||
Gains on sales of loans
|
(7,442 | ) | (4,973 | ) | (887 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from loan sales
|
506,850 | 347,083 | 60,305 | |||||||||||||
Loans originated for sale
|
(483,384 | ) | (389,153 | ) | (59,292 | ) | ||||||||||
Investment securities (gains) losses
|
768 | (530 | ) | 58 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation expense and amortization of
intangible assets
|
10,479 | 8,460 | 6,775 | |||||||||||||
Net amortization of investment securities
|
6,350 | 1,583 | 339 | |||||||||||||
Net increase in accrued income and other assets
|
(3,094 | ) | (5,663 | ) | (4,461 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in interest payable and
other liabilities
|
6,828 | (2,095 | ) | (821 | ) | |||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY (USED IN) OPERATING
ACTIVITIES
|
96,065 | (46 | ) | 44,612 | ||||||||||||
INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Premium paid in acquisitions
|
| (22,602 | ) | | ||||||||||||
Securities available for sale:
|
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal
reductions
|
271,826 | 234,199 | 248,879 | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from sales
|
3,274 | 68,254 | 34,118 | |||||||||||||
Purchases
|
(396,666 | ) | (385,061 | ) | (274,910 | ) | ||||||||||
Securities held to maturity:
|
||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from maturities, calls and principal
reductions
|
123,656 | 84,099 | 133,277 | |||||||||||||
Purchases
|
(191,025 | ) | (46,474 | ) | (111,485 | ) | ||||||||||
Net (increase) decrease in loans
|
80,067 | (288,144 | ) | (139,202 | ) | |||||||||||
Purchases of premises and equipment
|
(5,510 | ) | (10,313 | ) | (5,715 | ) | ||||||||||
NET CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(114,378 | ) | (366,042 | ) | (115,038 | ) | ||||||||||
FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Net increase in demand deposits,
NOW accounts and savings accounts |
139,249 | 261,944 | 16,283 | |||||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in certificates of
deposit and other time deposits
|
(81,501 | ) | 84,425 | 72,216 | ||||||||||||
Proceeds from Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB)
borrowings
|
| 96,725 | 70,000 | |||||||||||||
Repayment of FHLB borrowings
|
(10,500 | ) | (45,638 | ) | (64,219 | ) | ||||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in other
borrowings short term
|
(14,372 | ) | 14,133 | 21,679 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid
|
(21,648 | ) | (20,577 | ) | (19,053 | ) | ||||||||||
Proceeds from directors stock purchase plan
|
191 | 187 | 303 | |||||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
512 | 484 | 1,484 | |||||||||||||
Repurchases of common stock
|
(408 | ) | (271 | ) | (4,179 | ) | ||||||||||
NET CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
11,523 | 391,412 | 94,514 | |||||||||||||
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(6,790 | ) | 25,324 | 24,088 | ||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
277,937 | 252,613 | 228,525 | |||||||||||||
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS AT END OF YEAR
|
$ | 271,147 | $ | 277,937 | $ | 252,613 | ||||||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest paid on deposits, FHLB borrowings and
other borrowings short term
|
$ | 66,394 | $ | 93,471 | $ | 94,875 | ||||||||||
Federal income taxes paid
|
27,925 | 25,232 | 21,788 |
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
Years Ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Unearned | Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Incentive | Retained | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | Stock | Surplus | Plan | Earnings | Income (Loss) | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCES AT JANUARY 1, 2000
|
$ | 20,819 | $ | 235,023 | $ | (723 | ) | $ | 80,117 | $ | (5,838 | ) | $ | 329,398 | |||||||||||||
Stock dividend 5%
|
671 | 25,670 | | (26,341 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for 2000
|
| | | 40,801 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gains on securities
available for sale, net of tax of $4,829
|
| | | | 8,969 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
| | | | | 49,770 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid of $.80 per share
|
| | | (19,053 | ) | | (19,053 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued stock options
|
26 | 242 | | | | 268 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued directors stock
purchase plan
|
9 | 273 | | | | 282 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares earned under stock incentive plan
|
| | 208 | | | 208 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued dividend reinvestment
plan
|
| 1,216 | | | | 1,216 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of shares
|
(126 | ) | (4,053 | ) | | | | (4,179 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2000
|
21,399 | 258,371 | (515 | ) | 75,524 | 3,131 | 357,910 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Stock dividend 5%
|
1,072 | 31,806 | | (32,878 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for 2001
|
| | | 42,723 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gains on securities
available for sale, net of tax of $4,503
|
| | | | 8,363 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
| | | | | 51,086 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid of $.87 per share
|
| | | (20,577 | ) | | (20,577 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued stock options
|
41 | 443 | | | | 484 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued directors stock
purchase plan
|
13 | 296 | | | | 309 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares earned under stock incentive plan
|
| | 515 | | | 515 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of shares
|
(11 | ) | (260 | ) | | | | (271 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2001
|
22,514 | 290,656 | | 64,792 | 11,494 | 389,456 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock dividend 5%
|
1,128 | 34,240 | | (35,368 | ) | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income for 2002
|
| | | 54,945 | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized gains on securities
available for sale, net of tax of $3,926
|
| | | | 7,291 | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income
|
| | | | | 62,236 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cash dividends paid of $.91 per share
|
| | | (21,648 | ) | | (21,648 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued stock options
|
50 | 462 | | | | 512 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Shares issued directors stock
purchase plan
|
7 | 184 | | | | 191 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of shares
|
(15 | ) | (393 | ) | | | | (408 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
BALANCES AT DECEMBER 31, 2002
|
$ | 23,684 | $ | 325,149 | $ | | $ | 62,721 | $ | 18,785 | $ | 430,339 | |||||||||||||||
See notes to consolidated financial statements.
The accounting and reporting policies of Chemical Financial Corporation (Corporation) and its subsidiaries conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and prevailing practices within the banking industry. Management makes estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying footnotes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. Significant accounting policies of the Corporation and its subsidiaries are described below:
Basis of Presentation and Principles of Consolidation:
Cash and Cash Equivalents:
Investment Securities Available for Sale:
Investment securities available for sale are stated at estimated market value, with the aggregate unrealized gains and losses, net of income taxes, classified as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income. Realized gains and losses from the sale of investment securities available for sale are determined using the specific identification method and are classified as noninterest income in the consolidated statements of income.
Premiums and discounts on investment securities available for sale, as well as on investment securities held to maturity, are amortized over the estimated lives of the related investment securities.
Investment Securities Held to Maturity:
Loans:
Loan performance is reviewed regularly by loan review personnel, loan officers and senior management. Loan interest income is recognized on the accrual basis. The past-due status of a loan is based on the loans contractual terms. A loan is placed in the nonaccrual category when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection, or earlier when, in the opinion of management, there is sufficient reason to doubt the collectibility of future principal or interest. Interest previously accrued, but not collected, is reversed and charged against interest income at the time the loan is placed in nonaccrual status. The subsequent recognition of interest income on a nonaccrual loan is then recognized only to the extent cash is received and where future collection of principal is probable. Loans are returned to accrual status when principal and interest payments are brought current and collectibility is no longer in doubt. Interest income on restructured loans is recognized according to the terms of the restructure, subject to the above described nonaccrual policy.
Nonperforming loans are comprised of those loans accounted for on a nonaccrual basis, accruing loans contractually past due 90 days or more as to interest or principal payments, and other loans for which the terms have been restructured to provide for a reduction or deferral of interest or principal because of a deterioration in the financial position of the borrower.
Consistent with this definition, all nonaccrual commercial and real estate commercial loans are considered impaired loans by the Corporation. A loan is defined to be impaired when it is probable that payment of principal and interest will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are carried at the present value of expected cash flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate or at the fair value of the collateral, if the loan is collateral dependent. A portion of the allowance for loan losses may be allocated to impaired loans. All nonaccrual commercial loans and real estate commercial loans are evaluated individually to determine whether or not an impairment allowance is required.
Allowance for Loan Losses:
provide for loan losses inherent in the loan portfolio. The Corporation maintains formal policies and procedures to monitor and control credit risk. Managements evaluation of the adequacy of the allowance is based on a continuing review of the loan portfolio, actual loan loss experience, risk characteristics of the loan portfolio, the level and composition of nonperforming loans, the financial condition of the borrowers, balance of the loan portfolio, loan growth, economic conditions, employment levels of the Corporations local markets, and special factors affecting specific business sectors.
This evaluation involves a high degree of uncertainty. Loans that are considered uncollectible are charged-off and deducted from the allowance. The provision for loan losses and recoveries on loans previously charged-off are added to the allowance. While the Corporation allocates portions of the allowance for specific problem loans and to specific loan categories, the entire allowance is available for any loan losses that occur.
Mortgage Banking Operations:
The Corporation accounts for mortgage servicing rights in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 140, Accounting for Transfers and Servicing of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities (SFAS 140). SFAS 140 requires that an asset be recognized for the rights to service mortgage loans, including those rights that are created by the origination of mortgage loans that are sold with the servicing rights retained by the originator. The recognition of the asset results in an increase in the gains recognized upon the sale of the mortgage loans sold. The Corporation amortizes mortgage servicing rights in proportion to, and over the life of, the estimated net future servicing income and performs a periodic evaluation of the fair market value of the mortgage servicing rights. Prepayments of mortgage loans result in increased amortization of mortgage servicing rights as the remaining book value of the mortgage servicing right is expensed at the time of prepayment. Any impairment of mortgage servicing rights is recognized as a valuation allowance. For purposes of measuring impairment, the Corporation utilizes a third-party modeling software program, which stratifies capitalized mortgage servicing rights by interest rate, term and loan type. Servicing income is recognized in noninterest income when received and expenses are recognized when incurred.
Premises and Equipment:
A summary of premises and equipment at December 31 follows:
2002 | 2001 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Bank premises
|
$ | 57,335 | $ | 55,728 | ||||
Equipment
|
32,668 | 33,372 | ||||||
90,003 | 89,100 | |||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
47,236 | 45,957 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 42,767 | $ | 43,143 | ||||
Other Real Estate:
Intangible Assets:
Goodwill was $27.94 million both at December 31, 2002 and 2001. Core deposit and other intangibles were $10.0 and $11.8 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively.
Stock Options:
Other Borrowings Short Term:
Income Taxes:
Earnings Per Share:
The Corporations common stock equivalents consist of common stock issuable under the assumed exercise of stock options granted under the Corporations stock option plans, using the treasury stock method. The following table summarizes the number of shares used in the denominator of the basic and diluted earnings per share computations for the years ended December 31:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
Denominator for basic earnings per share | 23,676,623 | 23,626,163 | 23,569,732 | |||||||||
Denominator for diluted earnings per share | 23,741,981 | 23,691,697 | 23,640,733 |
Comprehensive Income:
Operating Segment:
commercial banks and operate under the same banking regulations. The data processing subsidiary primarily performs data processing functions for the Corporations commercial bank subsidiaries.
The Corporations primary sources of revenues are from its loan products and investment securities. The following table summarizes the Corporations revenue from its specific loan products for the years ended December 31:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||
Interest income and fee revenue:
|
|||||||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 22,706 | $ | 24,922 | $ | 23,228 | |||||||
Real estate construction
|
8,070 | 8,095 | 6,018 | ||||||||||
Real estate commercial
|
34,753 | 30,946 | 28,009 | ||||||||||
Real estate residential
|
50,557 | 60,224 | 58,844 | ||||||||||
Consumer
|
39,717 | 37,235 | 30,811 | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 155,803 | $ | 161,422 | $ | 146,910 | |||||||
Common Stock:
Business Combinations:
Reclassification:
During the three years ended December 31, 2002, the Corporation made the following merger, acquisitions and consolidations:
On September 14, 2001, the Corporation acquired Bank West Financial Corporation (BWFC). BWFC was the parent company of Bank West, a Michigan stock savings bank with five full-service branches and one loan production office in Kent and Ottawa counties in Michigan. The purchase added approximately $300 million in total assets, $232 million in total loans and $194 million in total deposits as of the date of acquisition, for which the Corporation paid a premium of $7.3 million. Bank West was merged into the Corporations existing subsidiary, Chemical Bank West. The Corporation exchanged $29.2 million in cash for all of the outstanding stock of BWFC. The transaction was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting.
On July 13, 2001, the Corporation acquired four branch banking offices from Fifth Third Bank and Old Kent Bank in Holland, Zeeland, Grand Haven and Fremont, Michigan. The purchase of the four branch banking offices added total deposits of approximately $144 million and total loans of $97 million as of the date of acquisition, for which the Corporation paid a premium of $15.3 million. The offices in Holland, Zeeland and Grand Haven are being operated as branches of Chemical Bank Shoreline, and Chemical Bank West is operating the office in Fremont. The transaction was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting.
The acquisitions of the four branches and BWFC in 2001 were accounted for by the purchase method; therefore, the financial results of these operations are included from their respective acquisition dates, with no restatement of prior period amounts.
On January 9, 2001, the Corporation merged with Shoreline Financial Corporation (Shoreline), a one-bank holding company headquartered in Benton Harbor, Michigan and parent company of Shoreline Bank. As of the effective date of the transaction, Shoreline had total assets of approximately $1.1 billion, total deposits of approximately $.8 billion and total loans of approximately $.8 billion. The Corporation is operating Shoreline Bank through a separate subsidiary of the Corporation, Chemical Bank Shoreline, with its headquarters in Benton Harbor. The Corporation issued approximately 8.2 million shares of common stock for all of the outstanding stock of Shoreline. The transaction was accounted for as a pooling of interests business combination and, therefore, all prior period amounts included in the consolidated financial statements were
restated to include Shoreline as if it had always been part of the Corporation.
On December 31, 2000, the Corporation consolidated nine of its then ten subsidiary banks into two; Chemical Bank and Trust Company and Chemical Bank West. Chemical Bank South, headquartered in Marshall, Michigan remained a separate subsidiary until October 26, 2001 when it was consolidated into Chemical Bank Shoreline.
On March 24, 2000, the Corporation acquired two branch banking offices from Old Kent Bank located in Evart and Morrice, Michigan. The branches had total deposits of approximately $15 million and $10 million, respectively, as of that date, for which the Corporation paid a premium of approximately $1.7 million. The offices became branch offices of existing bank subsidiaries. The transaction was accounted for by the purchase method of accounting.
The Corporation incurred pre-tax merger and consolidation related restructuring expenses of $9.2 million ($7.1 million after-tax) in the first quarter of 2001. The expenses were incurred in connection with the completion of the merger between the Corporation and Shoreline on January 9, 2001 and the consolidation of nine of the Corporations subsidiary banks into two, effective December 31, 2000. A summary of these costs follows: professional fees of $5.3 million; settlement of employment agreements of $2.5 million; severance awards of $.3 million; and other costs of $1.1 million. The entire merger and restructuring reserve was utilized during 2001.
Severance awards were granted to 51 employees whose positions were eliminated during 2001 in the internal bank consolidation project and who elected not to accept another position within the Corporation. The severance awards comprised approximately three percent of the total merger and consolidation related restructuring expenses.
The following is a summary of the amortized cost and estimated market value of investment securities available for sale and investment securities held to maturity at December 31, 2002 and 2001 (in thousands):
Investment Securities Available for Sale:
Gross | Gross | Estimated | |||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Market | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2002 | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | |||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
$ | 568,870 | $ | 21,313 | $ | $ | 590,183 | ||||||||||
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
|
18,477 | 1,001 | | 19,478 | |||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
125,639 | 3,251 | 6 | 128,884 | |||||||||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
13,653 | 121 | 116 | 13,658 | |||||||||||||
Other debt securities
|
83,600 | 2,828 | 100 | 86,328 | |||||||||||||
Total debt securities
|
810,239 | 28,514 | 222 | 838,531 | |||||||||||||
Equity securities
|
19,606 | 694 | 87 | 20,213 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 829,845 | $ | 29,208 | $309 | $ | 858,744 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2001
|
|||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
$ | 528,737 | $ | 13,678 | $ | 510 | $ | 541,905 | |||||||||
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
|
22,699 | 635 | 23 | 23,311 | |||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
95,492 | 1,790 | 127 | 97,155 | |||||||||||||
Other debt securities
|
49,900 | 1,579 | 61 | 51,418 | |||||||||||||
Total debt securities
|
696,828 | 17,682 | 721 | 713,789 | |||||||||||||
Equity securities
|
16,873 | 1,015 | 294 | 17,594 | |||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 713,701 | $ | 18,697 | $ | 1,015 | $ | 731,383 | |||||||||
Investment Securities Held to Maturity:
Gross | Gross | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
Amortized | Unrealized | Unrealized | Market | |||||||||||||
December 31, 2002 | Cost | Gains | Losses | Value | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
$ | 204,422 | $5,289 | $ | $ | 209,711 | ||||||||||
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
|
41,009 | 1,925 | 66 | 42,868 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
5,682 | 590 | | 6,272 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities
|
18,125 | 255 | | 18,380 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 269,238 | $8,059 | $66 | $ | 277,231 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2001
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
$ | 125,460 | $2,942 | $ 27 | $ | 128,375 | ||||||||||
States of the U.S. and political subdivisions
|
42,879 | 1,221 | 179 | 43,921 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
11,174 | 601 | 12 | 11,763 | ||||||||||||
Other debt securities
|
21,379 | 774 | | 22,153 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 200,892 | $5,538 | $218 | $ | 206,212 | ||||||||||
The amortized cost and estimated market value of debt and equity securities at December 31, 2002, by contractual maturity for both available for sale and held to maturity investment securities follows:
Investment Securities Available for Sale:
Estimated | ||||||||
Amortized | Market | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Due in one year or less
|
$ | 136,760 | $ | 139,161 | ||||
Due after one year through five years
|
522,529 | 544,517 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years
|
8,329 | 8,738 | ||||||
Due after ten years
|
3,329 | 3,573 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
125,639 | 128,884 | ||||||
Collateralized mortgage obligations
|
13,653 | 13,658 | ||||||
Equity securities
|
19,606 | 20,213 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 829,845 | $ | 858,744 | ||||
Investment Securities Held to Maturity:
Estimated | ||||||||
Amortized | Market | |||||||
Cost | Value | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Due in one year or less
|
$ | 68,108 | $ | 68,890 | ||||
Due after one year through five years
|
177,022 | 182,765 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years
|
12,725 | 13,463 | ||||||
Due after ten years
|
5,701 | 5,841 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities
|
5,682 | 6,272 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 269,238 | $ | 277,231 | ||||
Investment securities with a book value of $358.7 million at December 31, 2002 were pledged to collateralize public fund deposits and for other purposes as required by law; at December 31, 2001, the corresponding amount was $366.9 million.
The Corporation recognized net losses on investment securities of $768,000 during 2002, net gains of $530,000 in 2001 and net losses of $58,000 in 2000. During 2002, the Corporation recorded a $472,000 write-down to market value relating to certain equity securities, as part of its total net investment securities losses of $768,000, as the Corporation projected that the decline in the market value of these securities was other than temporary. The equity securities portfolio at December 31, 2002 consisted of $2.5 million of common stocks of various publicly traded entities, $15.9 million of Federal Home Loan Bank stock and $1.2 million of Federal Reserve Bank stock.
For the three years ended December 31, 2002, activity for capitalized mortgage servicing rights was as follows (in thousands):
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage Servicing Rights:
|
||||||||||||||
Beginning of year
|
$ | 2,844 | $ | 1,591 | $ | 1,658 | ||||||||
Additions
|
2,340 | 1,857 | 214 | |||||||||||
Amortization
|
(2,076 | ) | (424 | ) | (281 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for impairment
|
(613 | ) | (180 | ) | | |||||||||
End of year
|
$ | 2,495 | $ | 2,844 | $ | 1,591 | ||||||||
Additions of mortgage servicing rights were up significantly in 2002, compared to 2001 and 2000, due to significantly higher residential mortgage loan volume, which was mostly attributable to declining interest rates. The lower interest rate environment of 2002 created an incentive for customers to refinance their mortgages and purchase new homes. The lower interest rate environment prompted customers to choose long-term fixed rate mortgages over other mortgage products. The Corporation generally sells its long-term fixed rate mortgages in the secondary market either on a servicing retained or servicing released basis. Mortgage loans serviced for others, which are not reported as assets on the consolidated statement of financial position, were up 24.9% and totaled $543 million at December 31, 2002, compared to $433 million at December 31, 2001. The fair value of mortgage servicing rights approximated its carrying value during each of the three years ended December 31, 2002.
During 2002, the Corporation recorded a $613,000 impairment provision to reflect the decline in the estimated fair value of mortgage servicing rights compared to the recorded book value. This amount reduced mortgage banking revenue shown on the consolidated statement of income. The decline in the estimated fair value of mortgage servicing rights was due to the continued decline in overall market interest rates for residential mortgages and the corresponding increase in prepayments of loans serviced for others. The valuation reserve for impairment of mortgage servicing rights was $.79 million and $.18 million at December 31, 2002 and 2001, respectively. A valuation reserve for mortgage servicing rights was not required at December 31, 2000.
Loans held for sale were $31.4 million at December 31, 2002 and $47.4 million at December 31, 2001. The decrease in loans held for sale was attributable to a shift in emphasis during the second half of 2002 to hold in the portfolio a portion of the long-term residential mortgage loan originations.
The following summarizes loans as of December 31:
2002 | 2001 | |||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Commercial
|
$ | 327,438 | $ | 332,055 | ||||
Real estate construction
|
108,589 | 137,500 | ||||||
Real estate commercial
|
481,084 | 432,747 | ||||||
Real estate residential
|
648,286 | 769,272 | ||||||
Consumer
|
509,789 | 510,967 | ||||||
Total loans
|
$ | 2,075,186 | $ | 2,182,541 | ||||
The Corporations subsidiary banks have extended loans to its directors, officers and their affiliates. The loans were made in the ordinary course of business at normal terms, including collateralization and interest rates prevailing at the time and did not involve more than the normal risk of repayment by the borrower. The aggregate loans outstanding to the directors, officers and their affiliates totaled approximately $38.7 million at December 31, 2002 and $34.0 million at December 31, 2001. During 2002, there were approximately $39.4 million of new loans and other additions, while repayments and other reductions totaled approximately $34.7 million.
Changes in the allowance for loan losses were as follows for the years ended December 31:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year
|
$ | 30,994 | $ | 26,883 | $ | 26,174 | |||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
3,765 | 2,004 | 1,587 | ||||||||||||
Loan charge-offs
|
(4,830 | ) | (2,134 | ) | (1,510 | ) | |||||||||
Loan recoveries
|
743 | 479 | 632 | ||||||||||||
Net loan charge-offs
|
(4,087 | ) | (1,655 | ) | (878 | ) | |||||||||
Allowance of banks/branches acquired
|
| 3,762 | | ||||||||||||
Balance at end of year
|
$ | 30,672 | $ | 30,994 | $ | 26,883 | |||||||||
Nonaccrual loans totaled $4.9 million, $6.9 million and $7.3 million at December 31, 2002, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
During the first quarter of 2002, the Corporation changed its methodology of identifying loans as being of an impaired status. Previously, the Corporation analyzed all nonaccrual commercial and real estate commercial loans for impairment before determining which loans were impaired. Based on conservative management philosophies, as of January 1, 2002, the Corporation took the position that all nonaccrual commercial and real estate commercial loans are impaired. This change had no effect on the allowance allocated to impaired loans, as the additional loans classified as impaired did not require an impairment allowance as of January 1, 2002.
Impaired loans under the new classification totaled $2.3 million as of December 31, 2002, $5.1 million as of December 31, 2001 and $5.5 million as of December 31, 2000. After analyzing the various components of the customer relationships and evaluating the underlying collateral of impaired loans, the allowance for loan losses allocated to impaired loans was as follows: $.8 million as of December 31, 2002, $1.1 million as of December 31, 2001 and $1.2 million as of December 31, 2000.
The provision for federal income taxes is less than that computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate of 35%, primarily due to tax-exempt interest on investment securities and loans, partially offset by non-deductible merger and restructuring expenses, as shown in the following analysis for the years ended December 31:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Tax at statutory rate
|
$ | 29,027 | $ | 22,869 | $ | 21,182 | |||||||||
Changes resulting from:
|
|||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt income
|
(1,228 | ) | (1,741 | ) | (1,768 | ) | |||||||||
Non-deductible merger and restructuring expenses
|
| 1,118 | | ||||||||||||
Other
|
191 | 371 | 307 | ||||||||||||
Total federal income tax expense
|
$ | 27,990 | $ | 22,617 | $ | 19,721 | |||||||||
The provision for federal income taxes consisted of the following for the years ended December 31:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Current
|
$ | 26,267 | $ | 25,632 | $ | 22,223 | ||||||||
Deferred taxes (benefit)
|
1,723 | (3,015 | ) | (2,502 | ) | |||||||||
Total
|
$ | 27,990 | $ | 22,617 | $ | 19,721 | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes. Significant temporary differences that comprise the deferred tax assets
and liabilities of the Corporation were as follows as of December 31:
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||
Deferred tax assets:
|
||||||||||
Allowance for loan losses
|
$ | 10,355 | $ | 10,308 | ||||||
Employee benefit plans
|
1,129 | 2,519 | ||||||||
Investment securities mark to market
|
1,302 | 1,136 | ||||||||
Other
|
3,927 | 2,495 | ||||||||
Total deferred tax assets
|
16,713 | 16,458 | ||||||||
Deferred tax liabilities:
|
||||||||||
Investment securities available for sale
|
10,114 | 6,189 | ||||||||
Other
|
3,934 | 2,501 | ||||||||
Total deferred tax liabilities
|
14,048 | 8,690 | ||||||||
Net deferred tax assets
|
$ | 2,665 | $ | 7,768 | ||||||
Federal income tax expense (benefit) applicable to gains (losses) on investment securities transactions was $(104,000) in 2002, $186,000 in 2001 and $(20,000) in 2000, and is included in federal income taxes on the consolidated statements of income.
The Corporation had two noncontributory defined benefit pension plans (Plans) covering the majority of its employees through December 31, 2001, as a result of the merger with Shoreline on January 9, 2001. Normal retirement benefits of the Plans were based on years of service and the employees average annual pay for the five highest consecutive years during the ten years preceding retirement under the Plans. Effective January 1, 2002, the Plans were merged into a single noncontributory defined benefit pension plan (New Plan). The New Plan continues to cover the majority of the Corporations employees. Like the predecessor Plans, retirement benefits in the New Plan are based on years of service, age at retirement and the employees compensation during the five highest consecutive years of earnings within the last ten years of employment. The retirement benefits under the New Plan are substantially the same as the Corporations plan prior to the merger with Shoreline. Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to service to date but also for those expected to be earned in the future.
The New Plans assets consist primarily of listed stocks, U.S. government securities and 201,329 shares of the Corporations common stock. The market value of the 201,329 shares was $6.2 million at December 31, 2002.
The following table sets forth the changes in the benefit obligation and plan assets of the Plans and the New Plan:
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$47,858 | $45,537 | |||||||||
Service cost
|
3,065 | 2,172 | |||||||||
Interest cost
|
3,503 | 3,121 | |||||||||
Amendments
|
| (336 | ) | ||||||||
Net actuarial loss
|
7,441 | 1,696 | |||||||||
Curtailment
|
| (1,088 | ) | ||||||||
Special separation program benefits
|
| 1,336 | |||||||||
Settlement
|
| (2,183 | ) | ||||||||
Benefits paid
|
(1,848 | ) | (2,397 | ) | |||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
$60,019 | $47,858 | |||||||||
Change in the plans assets:
|
|||||||||||
Fair value of the plans assets at beginning
of year
|
$50,781 | $53,496 | |||||||||
Actual return on plans assets
|
(4,810 | ) | 923 | ||||||||
Contributions by the Corporation
|
5,846 | 996 | |||||||||
Settlement
|
| (1,281 | ) | ||||||||
Benefits paid
|
(1,848 | ) | (3,353 | ) | |||||||
Fair value of the plans assets at end of
year
|
$49,969 | $50,781 | |||||||||
Overfunded (underfunded) status of the plans
|
$(10,050 | ) | $2,923 | ||||||||
Unrecognized net actuarial (gain) loss
|
15,419 | (1,382 | ) | ||||||||
Unrecognized net transition (asset) obligation
|
(11 | ) | 54 | ||||||||
Unrecognized prior service benefit
|
(261 | ) | (302 | ) | |||||||
Prepaid benefit cost
|
$5,097 | $1,293 | |||||||||
As the above table shows, the benefit obligation increased by $12.2 million to $60.0 million at December 31, 2002 from $47.8 million at December 31, 2001. The increase was higher than in prior years due to a $7.4 million net actuarial loss recognized during 2002, resulting primarily from a lower weighted average discount rate used in 2002.
Weighted-average assumptions as of December 31:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Discount rate used in determining benefit
obligation
|
6.5 | % | 7 | % | 7.0- 7.5 | % | ||||||||
Expected return on plan assets
|
8 | % | 8 | % | 8 | % | ||||||||
Rate of compensation increase
|
5 | % | 5 | % | 4.5- 5 | % |
Net periodic pension cost of the plans consisted of the following for the years ended December 31:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 3,065 | $ | 2,172 | $ | 2,175 | ||||||||
Interest cost
|
3,503 | 3,121 | 3,045 | |||||||||||
Curtailment
|
| (1,083 | ) | | ||||||||||
Settlement
|
| 131 | | |||||||||||
Special separation program benefits
|
| 1,336 | | |||||||||||
Expected return on plans assets
|
(4,409 | ) | (4,291 | ) | (4,158 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of transition amount
|
(15 | ) | (95 | ) | (180 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of prior service benefit
|
(41 | ) | (23 | ) | (136 | ) | ||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized net (gain) loss
|
(14 | ) | (410 | ) | 125 | |||||||||
Pension expense
|
$ | 2,089 | $ | 858 | $ | 871 | ||||||||
Other Employee Benefit Plans:
One of the Corporations subsidiary banks maintained a 401(k) savings plan with an employer match through December 31, 2001. Participants in this 401(k) savings plan were eligible to make deferrals up to 15% of compensation. The subsidiary matched 50% of participants elective deferrals on the first 4% of the participants compensation. Expense under this plan was $163,000 and $205,000 in 2001 and 2000, respectively. Effective January 1, 2002, this plan was merged into the Corporations 401(k) savings plan (New 401(k) Plan). Prior to January 1, 2002, the Corporation also had a 401(k) plan that did not include an employer match. Effective January 1, 2002, the New 401(k) Plan provides participants a 50% match of their elective deferrals on the first 4% of the participants compensation, subject to qualified plan limits. Expense under the New 401(k) Plan was $481,000 in 2002.
In addition to the Corporations defined benefit pension plan, the Corporation has a postretirement benefits plan that provides medical benefits and dental benefits through age 65 to a portion of its employees. Through December 31, 2001, eligibility for such benefits was age 55 with at least ten years of service with the Corporation. Retirees are required to make contributions toward the cost of their benefits based on their years of credited service and age at retirement. Retiree contributions are adjusted annually. Effective January 1, 2002, the Corporation adopted a revised retiree medical program (Retiree Plan) which substantially reduced the future obligation of the Corporation for retiree medical costs. The Retiree Plan will generally provide employees access to retiree medical benefits for themselves and their dependents for those employees who retire at age 55 or thereafter with at least fifteen years of service. There will generally be no employer subsidy for these benefits. Retirees and certain employees within two years of retirement as of December 31, 2001 were grandfathered under the predecessor plan. There continues to be no employer subsidy for dependent benefits included in the grandfathered plan. The accounting for these postretirement benefits anticipates changes in future cost-sharing features such as retiree contributions (applicable to grandfathered participants), deductibles, copayments and coinsurance. The Corporation reserves the right to amend, modify or terminate these benefits at any time.
The following table sets forth changes in the Corporations postretirement benefit obligation:
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||
Change in benefit obligation:
|
|||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of year
|
$ | 4,265 | $ | 5,161 | |||||||
Service cost
|
22 | 210 | |||||||||
Interest cost
|
275 | 502 | |||||||||
Net actuarial (gain) loss
|
(168 | ) | 1,893 | ||||||||
Amendments
|
| (3,486 | ) | ||||||||
Curtailment
|
| (24 | ) | ||||||||
Special separation program benefits
|
| 220 | |||||||||
Benefits paid, net of retiree contributions
|
(254 | ) | (211 | ) | |||||||
Benefit obligation at end of year
|
$ | 4,140 | $ | 4,265 | |||||||
Unfunded status of the plan
|
$ | 4,140 | $ | 4,265 | |||||||
Unrecognized net actuarial loss
|
(1,395 | ) | (1,795 | ) | |||||||
Unrecognized prior service credit
|
3,219 | 3,544 | |||||||||
Accrued postretirement benefit cost
|
$ | 5,964 | $ | 6,014 | |||||||
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost consisted of the following for the years ended December 31:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Service cost
|
$ | 22 | $ | 210 | $ | 226 | ||||||||
Interest cost
|
275 | 502 | 355 | |||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost (benefit)
|
(324 | ) | 26 | (18 | ) | |||||||||
Curtailment
|
| (7 | ) | | ||||||||||
Amortization of unrecognized net loss
|
231 | | | |||||||||||
Special separation program benefits
|
| 220 | | |||||||||||
Net periodic postretirement benefit cost
|
$ | 204 | $ | 951 | $ | 563 | ||||||||
The weighted-average discount rate used in determining the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation was 6.5% at December 31, 2002, 7.0% at December 31, 2001 and 7.5% at December 31, 2000.
For measurement purposes, the annual rates of increase in the per capita cost of covered health care benefits and dental benefits for 2003 were each assumed at 9%. These rates were assumed to decrease gradually to 5% in 2008 and remain at that level thereafter.
The assumed health care and dental cost trend rates could have a significant effect on the amounts reported. A one-percentage-point change in these rates would have had the following effects:
1-Percentage- | 1-Percentage- | |||||||||
Point Increase | Point Decrease | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||
Effect on total of service and interest cost
components in 2002
|
$ | 33 | $ | (28 | ) | |||||
Effect on postretirement benefit obligation as of
December 31, 2002
|
$ | 464 | $ | (399 | ) |
Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of Indianapolis consisted of the following:
December 31 | ||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||
Fixed-rate advances; with maturities from April 2003 through May 2009, rates ranging from 4.79% 6.40% and a weighted average rate of 5.33% at December 31, 2002 | $ | 38,393 | $ | 38,893 | ||||||
Convertible fixed-rate advances; with maturities from January 2003 through February 2011, rates ranging from 4.49% 6.75% and a weighted average rate of 5.54% at December 31, 2002 | 119,000 | 119,000 | ||||||||
Variable-rate advance
|
| 10,000 | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 157,393 | $ | 167,893 | ||||||
For the convertible fixed-rate advances, the FHLB has the option to convert the advance to a variable-rate beginning one, two or five years after the origination date depending on the advance, and quarterly thereafter. The Corporation has the option to prepay, without penalty, an FHLB convertible fixed-rate advance when the FHLB exercises its option to convert it to a variable-rate advance. During 2002, the FHLB did not exercise this option on any advance. Prepayments of both fixed-rate and convertible fixed-rate advances are subject to prepayment penalties under the provisions and conditions of the credit policy of the FHLB. The Corporation did not incur any prepayment penalties for 2002, 2001 or 2000.
The FHLB borrowings are collateralized by a blanket lien on qualified one-to four family residential mortgage loans. The carrying value of these loans was $373.9 million, which represents a total borrowing capacity based on collateral of $257.8 million. Therefore, the Corporations additional borrowing availability through the FHLB at December 31, 2002 under the blanket lien agreement was $100.4 million.
At year-end 2002, scheduled principal reductions on these advances are as follows (in thousands):
2003
|
$ | 9,020 | ||
2004
|
20,377 | |||
2005
|
16,232 | |||
2006
|
28,692 | |||
2007
|
10,023 | |||
Thereafter
|
73,049 | |||
Total
|
$ | 157,393 | ||
Banking regulations require that banks maintain cash reserve balances in vault cash with the Federal Reserve Bank or with certain other qualifying banks. The aggregate average amount of such legal balances required to be maintained by the Corporations subsidiary banks was $25.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2002. During 2002, the Corporations subsidiary banks satisfied their legal reserve requirements almost exclusively by maintaining average vault cash balances in excess of their legal reserve requirements.
Federal and state banking regulations place certain restrictions on the transfer of assets in the form of dividends, loans or advances from the bank subsidiaries to the Corporation. At December 31, 2002, substantially all of the assets of the bank subsidiaries were restricted from transfer to the Corporation in the form of loans or advances. Dividends from its bank subsidiaries are the principal source of funds for the Corporation. Under the most restrictive of these regulations, the aggregate amount of dividends that can be paid by the Corporations bank subsidiaries to the parent company, without obtaining prior approval from bank regulatory agencies, was $56.4 million as of January 1, 2003. Dividends paid to the Corporation by its banking subsidiaries totaled $25.6 million in 2002, $51.1 million in 2001 and $34.8 million in 2000. In addition to the statutory limits, the Corporation also considers the overall financial and capital position of each subsidiary prior to making any cash dividend decisions.
The Corporation and its subsidiary banks are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the federal banking agencies. Under these capital requirements, the subsidiary banks must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. In addition, capital amounts and classifications are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators. Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory and possibly additional discretionary actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Corporations financial statements.
Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require minimum ratios of Tier 1 capital to average assets (Leverage Ratio), and of Tier 1 and Total capital to risk-weighted assets. These capital guidelines assign risk weights to on- and off-balance sheet items in arriving at total risk-weighted assets. Minimum capital levels are based upon perceived risk of various asset categories and certain off-balance sheet instruments.
At December 31, 2002 and 2001, the Corporations and each of its bank subsidiaries capital ratios exceeded the quantitative capital ratios required for an institution to be considered well-capitalized. Significant factors that may affect capital adequacy include, but are not limited to, a disproportionate growth in assets versus capital and a change in mix or credit quality of assets.
The table below compares the Corporations and each of its significant subsidiaries actual capital amounts and ratios with the quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy at December 31, 2002.
Capital Analysis
Risk-Based Capital | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Leverage | Tier 1 | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in millions) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Corporations capital
|
$ | 373 | 11 | % | $ | 373 | 17 | % | $ | 401 | 19 | % | ||||||||||||||
Required capital minimum
|
105 | 3 | 86 | 4 | 172 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Required capital well
capitalized definition
|
175 | 5 | 129 | 6 | 215 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chemical Bank and Trust Companys capital
|
163 | 10 | 163 | 19 | 174 | 20 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Required capital minimum
|
48 | 3 | 34 | 4 | 69 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Required capital well
capitalized definition
|
80 | 5 | 52 | 6 | 86 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chemical Bank Shorelines capital
|
99 | 8 | 99 | 13 | 109 | 14 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Required capital minimum
|
36 | 3 | 32 | 4 | 63 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Required capital well
capitalized definition
|
59 | 5 | 47 | 6 | 79 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Chemical Bank Wests capital
|
70 | 10 | 70 | 14 | 76 | 15 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Required capital minimum
|
22 | 3 | 20 | 4 | 40 | 8 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Required capital well
capitalized definition
|
36 | 5 | 30 | 6 | 50 | 10 |
The Corporations adoption of SFAS 142 created an inconsistency in the accounting for goodwill amortization between the years ended December 31, 2002 and 2001. Application of the nonamortization provisions of SFAS 142 resulted in an increase in net income of $960,000, or $.04 per share in 2002 compared to 2001. The following analysis is provided for comparability purposes had SFAS 142 been in effect during 2001 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Year Ended | |||||||||
December 31 | |||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
Reported net income
|
$ | 54,945 | $ | 42,723 | |||||
Goodwill amortization
|
| 960 | |||||||
Adjusted net income
|
$ | 54,945 | $ | 43,683 | |||||
Basic earnings per share
|
|||||||||
Reported net income
|
$ | 2.32 | $ | 1.81 | |||||
Goodwill amortization
|
| .04 | |||||||
Adjusted net income
|
$ | 2.32 | $ | 1.85 | |||||
Diluted earnings per share
|
|||||||||
Reported net income
|
$ | 2.31 | $ | 1.80 | |||||
Goodwill amortization
|
| .04 | |||||||
Adjusted net income
|
$ | 2.31 | $ | 1.84 | |||||
The Corporation is required to test goodwill for impairment using the two-step process prescribed in SFAS 142. The first step is a screen for potential impairment, while the second step measures the amount of the impairment, if any. The Corporation performed the first of the required impairment tests of goodwill and indefinite lived intangible assets as of January 1, 2002 during the second quarter of 2002. Based on the test results, the Corporation determined that there was no impairment of goodwill as of January 1, 2002. Therefore, there was no transition adjustment required to be recorded to the consolidated statements of income or financial position of the Corporation in conjunction with the adoption of SFAS 142. The Corporation also tested for potential goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2002. Based on these test results, the Corporation determined that there was no impairment of goodwill as of December 31, 2002.
The carrying amount of goodwill at December 31, 2002 was $27.94 million. There was no change in the carrying amount of goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2002.
The following table sets forth the carrying amount, accumulated amortization and amortization expense of acquired intangible assets (in thousands):
December 31, 2002 | December 31, 2001 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying | Accumulated | Carrying | Accumulated | |||||||||||||
Amount | Amortization | Amount | Amortization | |||||||||||||
Core deposit intangibles
|
$ | 9,898 | $ | 7,942 | $ | 11,831 | $ | 6,009 | ||||||||
Other
|
155 | 20 | | |
Amortization expense for the:
Year ended December 31, 2002
|
$ | 1,953 | ||
Year ended December 31, 2001
|
1,518 |
Estimated amortization expense for the years ending December 31:
2003
|
$ | 1,848 | ||
2004
|
1,819 | |||
2005
|
1,721 | |||
2006
|
1,607 | |||
2007
|
1,520 |
The Corporations stock option plans provide for grants of stock options, incentive stock options, stock appreciation rights, or a combination thereof. At December 31, 2002, there were a total of 418,904 shares available for future awards under the Corporations 1997 plan. The plan provides that the option price shall not be less than the fair market value of common stock at the date of grant, options become exercisable as specified in the option agreement governing the option as determined by the Compensation Committee of the board of directors, all awards expire no later than ten years and one day after the date of grant, and options granted may be designated nonstatutory options or incentive stock options. The Corporation does not record expense as a result of the grant or exercise of stock options.
Options granted may include a stock appreciation right that entitles the grantee to receive cash or a number of shares of common stock without payment to the Corporation, calculated by dividing the difference between the option price and the market price of the total number of shares in the option at the time of exercise of the stock appreciation right, by the market price of a single share. As of December 31, 2002, there were no outstanding options with stock appreciation rights.
The activity in the Corporations stock option plans during the three years ended December 31, 2002, was as follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Number of | Exercise | |||||||
Shares | Price | |||||||
Outstanding January 1, 2000
|
565,401 | $ | 20.85 | |||||
Activity during 2000:
|
||||||||
Granted
|
6,914 | 24.30 | ||||||
Exercised
|
(46,778 | ) | 8.64 | |||||
Cancelled
|
(2,541 | ) | 26.36 | |||||
Outstanding December 31, 2000
|
522,996 | 21.95 | ||||||
Activity during 2001:
|
||||||||
Granted
|
52,920 | 24.81 | ||||||
Exercised
|
(48,408 | ) | 13.15 | |||||
Cancelled
|
(5,856 | ) | 26.22 | |||||
Outstanding December 31, 2001
|
521,652 | 23.01 | ||||||
Activity during 2002:
|
||||||||
Granted
|
69,930 | 29.17 | ||||||
Exercised
|
(78,083 | ) | 15.64 | |||||
Cancelled
|
(12,722 | ) | 24.65 | |||||
Outstanding December 31, 2002
|
500,777 | $ | 24.97 | |||||
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at December 31, 2002:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | Weighted | |||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Average | |||||||||||||||||||||
Number | Exercise | Average | Range of | Number | Exercise | |||||||||||||||||
Outstanding | Price | Life(a) | Exercise Prices | Exercisable | Price | |||||||||||||||||
9,534 | $ | 14.21 | 3.89 | $ | 14.21 | 9,534 | $ | 14.21 | ||||||||||||||
74,635 | 18.21 | 1.07 | 16.82 19.27 | 74,635 | 18.21 | |||||||||||||||||
175,168 | 23.40 | 5.46 | 22.72 24.81 | 163,371 | 23.30 | |||||||||||||||||
241,440 | 28.63 | 7.12 | 26.90 28.89 | 159,644 | 28.41 | |||||||||||||||||
500,777 | $ | 24.97 | 5.58 | $ | 14.21 28.89 | 407,184 | $ | 24.16 | ||||||||||||||
(a) | Weighted average remaining contractual life in years |
The Corporation does not recognize compensation cost in accounting for awards of options under its stock option plans. If the Corporation had elected to recognize compensation cost for options granted in 2002, 2001 and 2000, based on the fair value of the options granted at the grant date, net income and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma amounts indicated below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||
Net income as reported
|
$ | 54,945 | $ | 42,723 | $ | 40,801 | ||||||
Net income pro forma
|
54,759 | 42,595 | 40,626 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per share as reported
|
2.32 | 1.81 | 1.73 | |||||||||
Basic earnings per share pro forma
|
2.31 | 1.80 | 1.72 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share as reported
|
2.31 | 1.80 | 1.72 | |||||||||
Diluted earnings per share pro forma
|
2.31 | 1.80 | 1.72 |
The weighted average fair values of options granted during 2002, 2001 and 2000 were $7.49, $6.55 and $7.14 per share, respectively. The fair value of each option grant is estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions:
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
Expected dividend yield
|
3.2 | % | 3.2 | % | 3.0 | % | ||||||||
Expected stock volatility
|
32.7 | % | 31.3 | % | 22.7 | % | ||||||||
Risk-free interest rate
|
3.03 | % | 4.69 | % | 6.70 | % | ||||||||
Expected life of options in years
|
6.5 | 5.7 | 8.0 |
Because of the unpredictability of the assumptions required, the Black-Scholes model, or any other valuation model, is incapable of accurately predicting the Corporations stock price or of placing an accurate present value on options to purchase its stock. In spite of any theoretical value which may be placed on a stock option grant, no increase of the stock options value is possible without an increase in the market value of the underlying stock.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the loan contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses. Historically, the majority of the commitments of the Corporations subsidiaries have not been drawn upon and, therefore, may not represent future cash requirements. Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued generally by the Corporations subsidiaries to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Both arrangements have credit risk essentially the same as that involved in making loans to customers and are subject to the Corporations normal credit policies. Collateral obtained upon exercise of commitments is determined using managements credit evaluation of the borrowers and may include real estate, business assets, deposits and other items. The Corporations subsidiaries at any point in time also have approved but undisbursed loans. The majority of these undisbursed loans will convert to booked loans within a three-month period.
Total unused loan commitments, standby letters of credit and undisbursed loans were $328 million, $13 million and $160 million, respectively, at December 31, 2002 and $303 million, $15 million and $179 million, respectively, at December 31, 2001. The majority of the unused loan commitments and standby letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2002 expire one year from their contract date, except for $26 million of unused loan commitments which extend for more than five years.
The Corporations unused loan commitments and standby letters of credit have been estimated to have no realizable fair value, as historically the majority of the unused loan commitments have not been drawn upon and generally the Corporations subsidiaries do not receive fees in connection with these agreements.
The Corporation has operating leases and other non-cancelable contractual obligations on buildings, equipment and certain computer software that will require annual payments through 2015. Minimum payments due in each of the next five years are as follows:
2003
|
$1.9 million | |
2004
|
$1.4 million | |
2005
|
$1.4 million | |
2006
|
$1.3 million | |
2007
|
$1.3 million |
Total expense recorded under lease and other non-cancelable contractual obligations in 2002, 2001 and 2000 was $1.4 million, $1.4 million and $1.2 million, respectively.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities (SFAS 133), as amended, became effective for the Corporation on January 1, 2001. SFAS 133 standardized the accounting for derivative instruments by requiring the recognition of those items as assets or liabilities in the consolidated statement of financial position and measuring them at fair value. SFAS 133 requires that changes in a derivatives fair value be recognized currently in earnings unless specific hedge accounting criteria are met. The Corporation implemented SFAS 133, as amended, effective January 1, 2001. The Corporations limited use of interest rate lock commitments on residential mortgage loans and related mandatory forward commitments resulted in no cumulative effect of the adoption of SFAS 133, and the impact on net income for the year ended December 31, 2002 was not material.
The Corporation and its subsidiary banks are subject to certain legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, after consulting with legal counsel, the ultimate disposition of these matters is not expected to have a material adverse effect on the consolidated income and financial position of the Corporation.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 107, Disclosures About Fair Value of Financial Instruments (SFAS 107), requires disclosures about the estimated fair values of the Corporations financial instruments. The Corporation utilized quoted market prices, where available, to compute the fair values of its financial instruments. In cases where quoted market prices were not available, the Corporation used present value methods to estimate the fair values of its financial instruments. These estimates of fair value are significantly affected by the assumptions made and, accordingly, do not necessarily indicate amounts that could be realized in a current market exchange. It is also the Corporations general practice and intent to hold the majority of its financial instruments until maturity and, therefore, the Corporation does not expect to realize the estimated amounts disclosed.
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Cash and demand deposits due from banks:
Interest-bearing deposits with unaffiliated banks and federal funds sold:
Investment securities:
Loans:
Deposit liabilities:
Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings:
Other borrowings short term:
Commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit and undisbursed loans:
Estimates of fair values have not been made for items which are not defined by SFAS 107 as financial instruments, including such items as the Corporations core deposit intangibles and the value of its trust department. The Corporation believes it is impractical to estimate a representative fair value for these types of assets, even though management believes they add significant value to the Corporation.
The following is a summary of carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the components of the consolidated statements of financial position at December 31:
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||
Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | ||||||||||||||||
Amount | Value | Amount | Value | ||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Assets:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing deposits and federal funds sold
|
$ | 123,035 | $ | 123,035 | $ | 127,391 | $ | 127,391 | |||||||||||
Investment securities
|
1,127,982 | 1,135,975 | 932,275 | 937,595 | |||||||||||||||
Net loans
|
2,044,514 | 2,065,944 | 2,151,547 | 2,186,188 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest-earning assets
|
273,362 | 273,362 | 277,093 | 277,093 | |||||||||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 3,568,893 | $ | 3,598,316 | $ | 3,488,306 | $ | 3,528,267 | |||||||||||
Liabilities:
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Deposits without defined maturities
|
$ | 1,859,288 | $ | 1,859,288 | $ | 1,720,039 | $ | 1,720,039 | |||||||||||
Time deposits
|
987,984 | 1,000,791 | 1,069,485 | 1,087,030 | |||||||||||||||
FHLB borrowings
|
157,393 | 173,172 | 167,893 | 177,170 | |||||||||||||||
Other borrowings-
short term |
104,212 | 104,212 | 118,584 | 118,584 | |||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing liabilities
|
29,677 | 29,677 | 22,849 | 22,849 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities
|
3,138,554 | 3,167,140 | 3,098,850 | 3,125,672 | |||||||||||||||
Shareholders Equity
|
430,339 | 431,176 | 389,456 | 402,595 | |||||||||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 3,568,893 | $ | 3,598,316 | $ | 3,488,306 | $ | 3,528,267 | |||||||||||
Condensed financial statements of Chemical Financial Corporation (parent company) follow:
December 31 | ||||||||||
Condensed Statements of Financial Position | 2002 | 2001 | ||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||
Assets:
|
||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at subsidiary bank
|
$ | 42,154 | $ | 37,788 | ||||||
Investment securities available for sale
|
4,296 | 4,979 | ||||||||
Investment in bank subsidiaries
|
387,204 | 350,367 | ||||||||
Investment in non-bank subsidiaries
|
4,148 | 2,959 | ||||||||
Goodwill
|
1,093 | 1,093 | ||||||||
Other assets
|
3,951 | 1,868 | ||||||||
Total assets
|
$ | 442,846 | $ | 399,054 | ||||||
Liabilities and Shareholders Equity:
|
||||||||||
Other liabilities
|
$ | 12,507 | $ | 9,598 | ||||||
Total liabilities
|
12,507 | 9,598 | ||||||||
Shareholders equity
|
430,339 | 389,456 | ||||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
|
$ | 442,846 | $ | 399,054 | ||||||
Years Ended December 31 | |||||||||||||||
Condensed Statements of Income | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | ||||||||||||
(In thousands) | |||||||||||||||
Income:
|
|||||||||||||||
Cash dividends from bank subsidiaries
|
$25,615 | $51,075 | $34,758 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends from non-bank subsidiaries
|
750 | 335 | 282 | ||||||||||||
Interest income from bank subsidiaries
|
564 | 2,631 | 2,102 | ||||||||||||
Other interest income and dividends
|
134 | 149 | 145 | ||||||||||||
Total income
|
27,063 | 54,190 | 37,287 | ||||||||||||
Investment securities gains (losses)
|
(829 | ) | (45 | ) | 116 | ||||||||||
Expenses:
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
2,796 | 2,878 | 2,390 | ||||||||||||
Amortization of goodwill
|
| 305 | 305 | ||||||||||||
Merger and restructuring expenses
|
| 7,069 | | ||||||||||||
Total expenses
|
2,796 | 10,252 | 2,695 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes and equity in
undistributed net income of subsidiaries
|
23,438 | 43,893 | 34,708 | ||||||||||||
Federal income tax benefit
|
828 | 1,663 | 14 | ||||||||||||
Equity in undistributed (excess distributed) net
income of:
|
|||||||||||||||
Bank subsidiaries
|
30,625 | (3,154 | ) | 5,608 | |||||||||||
Non-bank subsidiaries
|
54 | 321 | 471 | ||||||||||||
Net income
|
$54,945 | $42,723 | $40,801 | ||||||||||||
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||
Condensed Statements of Cash Flows | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | |||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Operating Activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Net income
|
$54,945 | $42,723 | $40,801 | |||||||||||
Stock incentive expense
|
| 515 | 208 | |||||||||||
Investment securities (gains) losses
|
829 | 45 | (116 | ) | ||||||||||
Equity in (undistributed) excess distributed net
income of subsidiaries
|
(30,679 | ) | 2,833 | (6,079 | ) | |||||||||
Other
|
865 | 1,200 | (796 | ) | ||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
25,960 | 47,316 | 34,018 | |||||||||||
Investing Activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Capital infusion into subsidiary bank
|
| (12,000 | ) | | ||||||||||
Net cash used in acquisitions
|
| (29,221 | ) | | ||||||||||
Purchases of investment securities available for
sale
|
(1,258 | ) | (1,447 | ) | (1,389 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from sales and maturities of investment
securities available for sale
|
1,017 | 1,535 | 1,046 | |||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(241 | ) | (41,133 | ) | (343 | ) | ||||||||
Financing Activities:
|
||||||||||||||
Repurchases of common stock
|
(408 | ) | (271 | ) | (4,179 | ) | ||||||||
Proceeds from directors stock purchase plan
|
191 | 187 | 303 | |||||||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
|
512 | 484 | 1,484 | |||||||||||
Cash dividends paid
|
(21,648 | ) | (20,577 | ) | (19,053 | ) | ||||||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(21,353 | ) | (20,177 | ) | (21,445 | ) | ||||||||
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
4,366 | (13,994 | ) | 12,230 | ||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
37,788 | 51,782 | 39,552 | |||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
$42,154 | $37,788 | $51,782 | |||||||||||
To the Board of Directors
Chemical Financial Corporation
We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of Chemical Financial Corporation and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Corporations management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Chemical Financial Corporation and subsidiaries at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
As discussed in Note L to the financial statements, in 2002 Chemical Financial Corporation and subsidiaries changed their method of accounting for goodwill.
We previously audited and reported on the consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2000, prior to their restatement for the 2001 pooling of interests as described in Note B to the consolidated financial statements. The contribution of Chemical Financial Corporation to total revenues and net income represented 63% and 71% of the respective 2000 restated totals. Financial statements of the other pooled company included in the 2000 restated consolidated statements were audited and reported on separately by other auditors. We also have audited, as to combination only, the accompanying consolidated statements of income, changes in shareholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2000, after restatement for the 2001 pooling of interests; in our opinion, such consolidated financial statements have been properly combined on the basis described in Note B to the consolidated financial statements.
January 21, 2003
(In thousands, except per share data) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
First | Second | Third | Fourth | First | Second | Third | Fourth | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | Quarter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest income
|
$ | 54,241 | $ | 53,292 | $ | 52,475 | $ | 51,036 | $ | 53,552 | $ | 53,300 | $ | 55,391 | $ | 57,007 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense
|
18,018 | 16,585 | 16,076 | 14,673 | 24,073 | 22,099 | 21,969 | 21,041 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net interest income
|
36,223 | 36,707 | 36,399 | 36,363 | 29,479 | 31,201 | 33,422 | 35,966 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision for loan losses
|
653 | 1,352 | 747 | 1,013 | 405 | 437 | 432 | 730 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Investment securities gains (losses)
|
(45 | ) | (40 | ) | (99 | ) | (584 | ) | 140 | 152 | 122 | 116 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Income before income taxes
|
20,562 | 20,334 | 21,106 | 20,933 | 7,148 | * | 18,174 | 19,491 | 20,527 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income
|
13,710 | 13,535 | 14,018 | 13,682 | 3,889 | * | 12,081 | 12,976 | 13,777 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income per share
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic
|
.58 | .57 | .59 | .58 | .16 | * | .51 | .55 | .59 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Diluted
|
.58 | .57 | .59 | .57 | .16 | * | .51 | .55 | .58 |
* | Includes merger and restructuring expenses of $9.2 million ($7.1 million on an after-tax basis) incurred to complete the merger with Shoreline and the internal consolidations. These expenses reduced net income per share, basic and diluted, $.30 per share. |
Chemical Financial Corporation common stock is traded on The Nasdaq Stock Market® under the symbol CHFC. As of December 31, 2002, there were approximately 23.7 million shares of Chemical Financial Corporation common stock issued and outstanding, held by approximately 5,500 shareholders of record. The table below sets forth the range of high and low trade prices for Chemical Financial Corporation common stock for the periods indicated. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail markup, markdown, or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.
2002 | 2001 | |||||||||||||||
High | Low | High | Low | |||||||||||||
First quarter
|
$ | 27.66 | $ | 24.14 | $ | 22.89 | $ | 16.68 | ||||||||
Second quarter
|
34.27 | 26.62 | 26.26 | 18.36 | ||||||||||||
Third quarter
|
34.52 | 24.13 | 25.40 | 21.51 | ||||||||||||
Fourth quarter
|
30.84 | 24.04 | 28.89 | 22.42 |
The earnings of the Corporations subsidiary banks are the principal source of funds to pay cash dividends. Consequently, cash dividends are dependent upon the earnings, capital needs, regulatory constraints, and other factors affecting each individual subsidiary bank. See Note J to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a discussion of such limitations. The Corporation has paid regular cash dividends every quarter since it was organized as a bank holding company in 1973. The following table summarizes the quarterly cash dividends paid to shareholders over the past five years, adjusted for stock dividends and a stock split paid during this time period, as well as the five percent stock dividend declared on December 9, 2002 that was paid January 24, 2003 to shareholders of record on January 6, 2003. Management expects the Corporation to declare and pay comparable regular quarterly cash dividends on its common shares in 2003.
Years Ended December 31 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 | ||||||||||||||||||
First quarter
|
$ | .228 | $ | .217 | $ | .199 | $ | .181 | $ | .167 | ||||||||||||
Second quarter
|
.228 | .217 | .199 | .181 | .167 | |||||||||||||||||
Third quarter
|
.228 | .217 | .199 | .181 | .167 | |||||||||||||||||
Fourth quarter
|
.228 | .217 | .199 | .181 | .167 | |||||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | .912 | $ | .868 | $ | .796 | $ | .724 | $ | .668 | ||||||||||||
At December 31, 2002
Board of Directors
|
J. Daniel Bernson President, The Hanson Group (a holding company with interests in diversified businesses in Southwest Michigan) | |||
James A. Currie Investor | ||||
Michael L. Dow Investor | ||||
L. Richard Marzke Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Pri-Mar Petroleum, Inc. (a wholesale and retail distributor of gasoline and petroleum products and convenience store operator) | ||||
Terence F. Moore President and Chief Executive Officer, MidMichigan Health (a health care organization) | ||||
Aloysius J. Oliver Chairman, Chemical Financial Corporation | ||||
Frank P. Popoff Retired, Former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Dow Chemical Company (a diversified science and technology company that manufactures chemical, plastic and agricultural products) | ||||
David B. Ramaker President and Chief Executive Officer, Chemical Financial Corporation | ||||
Dan L. Smith Retired, Former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, Shoreline Financial Corporation (a bank holding company) | ||||
William S. Stavropoulos Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, The Dow Chemical Company (a diversified science and technology company that manufactures chemical, plastic and agricultural products) | ||||
Executive Officers
|
Aloysius J. Oliver Chairman | |||
David B. Ramaker President and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
Bruce M. Groom Executive Vice President and Senior Trust Officer, Chemical Bank and Trust Company | ||||
Lori A. Gwizdala Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer | ||||
Thomas W. Kohn President and Chief Executive Officer, Chemical Bank West | ||||
William C. Lauderbach Executive Vice President and Senior Investment Officer, Chemical Bank and Trust Company | ||||
James R. Milroy Executive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer and Secretary | ||||
John A. Reisner President and Chief Executive Officer, Chemical Bank and Trust Company | ||||
James E. Tomczyk President and Chief Executive Officer, Chemical Bank Shoreline |
EXHIBIT NO. 21
Subsidiaries
|
State or Other Jurisdiction |
|
Bank subsidiaries: |
||
Chemical Bank and Trust Company |
Michigan |
|
Chemical Bank Shoreline |
Michigan |
|
Chemical Bank West |
Michigan |
|
Non-bank subsidiaries: |
||
CFC Data Corp |
Michigan |
|
CFC Financial Services, Inc. |
||
- also operates under d/b/a Chemical Financial Insurance Agency and |
||
d/b/a CFC Investment Centers |
Michigan |
|
CFC Title Services, Inc. |
Michigan |
|
B.W. Investment LLC |
Michigan |
|
Sunrise Mortgage Corporation |
Michigan |
|
Shoreline Insurance, Inc. |
Michigan |
|
Chemical Loan Management Corporation |
Michigan |
|
Chemical West Loan Management Corporation |
Michigan |
|
Chemical Shoreline Loan Management Corporation |
Michigan |
|
Chemical Loan Services, LLC |
Michigan |
|
Chemical West Loan Services, LLC |
Michigan |
|
Chemical Shoreline Loan Services, LLC |
Michigan |
EXHIBIT NO. 23.1
Consent of Independent Auditors
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statements listed below of our report dated January 21, 2003 with respect to the consolidated financial statements of Chemical Financial Corporation incorporated by reference in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002:
Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 33-15064, dated June 17, 1987) |
|
Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 33-40792, dated May 21, 1991) |
|
Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 333-38511, dated October 22, 1997) |
|
Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 333-70225, dated January 7, 1999) |
|
Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 333-56482, dated March 2, 2001) |
|
Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 333-84862, dated March 25, 2002) |
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8 Number 33-40792, dated May 21, 1991) of our report dated January 31, 2003 with respect to the financial statements and schedules of the Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 33-70225, dated January 7, 1999) of our report dated March 7, 2003 with respect to the financial statements of the Chemical Financial Corporation 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 333-84862, dated March 25, 2002) of our report dated March 7, 2003 with respect to the financial statements of the Chemical Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31, 2002.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|
Ernst & Young LLP |
March 14, 2003
EXHIBIT NO. 23.2
[CROWE CHIZEK LOGO]
CONSENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in (1) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 33-15064, dated June 17, 1987, pertaining to the Chemical Financial Corporation 1987 Award and Stock Option Plan, (2) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 33-40792, dated May 21, 1991) pertaining to the Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and in the related Prospectus, (3) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 333-38511, dated October 22, 1997) pertaining to the Chemical Financial Corporation 1997 Stock Incentive Plan, (4) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 333-70225, dated January 7, 1999), pertaining to the Chemical Financial Corporation 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors, (5) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 333-56482, dated March 2, 2001) pertaining to the Chemical Financial Corporation Stock Option Plan for Holders of Shoreline Financial Corporation, and ( 6) the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 333-84862, dated March 25, 2002) pertaining to the Chemical Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors of our report dated January 31, 2001 with respect to the Shoreline Financial Corporation consolidated statements of income, comprehensive income, shareholders' equity and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2000.
We consent to the incorporation by reference in the Registration Statement (Form S-8, Number 33-40792, dated May 21, 1991) pertaining to the Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan and in the related Prospectus of our report dated May 29, 2002, with respect to the financial statements and schedules for the period ended January 1, 2002 of the Shoreline Financial Corporation 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan included in the Annual Report (Form 10-K) of Chemical Financial Corporation for the year ended December 31, 2002.
|
Crowe Chizek and Company LLP |
EXHIBIT NO. 24
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ L. Richard Marzke |
|
(signature) |
||
L. Richard Marzke |
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ J. Daniel Bernson |
|
(signature) |
||
J. Daniel Bernson |
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ Nancy Bowman |
|
(signature) |
||
Nancy Bowman |
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ James A. Currie |
|
(signature) |
||
James A. Currie |
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ Michael L. Dow |
|
(signature) |
||
Michael L. Dow |
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ Terence F. Moore |
|
(signature) |
||
Terence F. Moore |
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ Frank P. Popoff |
|
(signature) |
||
Frank P. Popoff |
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ Dan L. Smith |
|
(signature) |
||
Dan L. Smith |
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ William S. Stavropoulos |
|
(signature) |
||
William S. Stavropoulos |
LIMITED POWER OF ATTORNEY
The undersigned, in his or her capacity as a director or officer, or both, of Chemical Financial Corporation, does hereby appoint ALOYSIUS J. OLIVER, DAVID B. RAMAKER and LORI A. GWIZDALA, or any of them, his or her attorneys or attorney, with full power of substitution, to execute in his or her name an Annual Report of Chemical Financial Corporation on Form 10-K for its fiscal year ended December 31, 2002, and any amendments to that report, and to file it with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Each attorney shall have power and authority to do and perform in the name and on behalf of the undersigned, in any and all capacities, every act to be done in the premises as fully and to all intents and purposes as the undersigned could do in person, and the undersigned hereby ratifies and approves the acts of such attorneys.
Dated: February 24, 2003 |
/s/ Aloysius J. Oliver |
|
(signature) |
||
Aloysius J. Oliver |
EXHIBIT NO. 99.1
Audited Financial Statements and Supplemental |
Chemical Financial Corporation
401(k) Savings Plan
Audited Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedule
December 31, 2002 and 2001 and Year ended December 31, 2002
Table of Contents
Report of Independent Auditors |
1 |
|
|
Financial Statements |
|
|
|
Statements of Assets Available for Benefits |
2 |
Statement of Changes in Assets Available for Benefits |
3 |
Notes to Financial Statements |
4 |
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Schedule |
|
|
|
Schedule H, Line 4(i)-Schedule of Assets (Held at End of Year) |
8 |
Report of Independent Auditors
Administrative Committee
Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan
We have audited the accompanying statements of assets available for benefits of the Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan as of December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the related statement of changes in assets available for benefits for the year ended December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Plan's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the assets available for benefits of the Plan at December 31, 2002 and 2001, and the changes in its assets available for benefits for the year ended December 31, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
Our audits were performed for the purpose of forming an opinion on the financial statements taken as a whole. The accompanying supplemental schedule of assets (held at end of year) as of December 31, 2002 is presented for purpose of additional analysis and is not a required part of the financial statements but is supplementary information required by the Department of Labor's Rules and Regulations for Reporting and Disclosure under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The supplemental schedule is the responsibility of the Plan's management. The supplemental schedule has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in our audits of the financial statements and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP |
|
Ernst & Young LLP |
January 31, 2003
Detroit, Michigan
1
Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan
Statements of Assets Available for Benefits
|
December 31 |
||||
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
||
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Investments, at fair value: |
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Financial Corporation common stock |
$ |
7,717,936 |
|
$ |
2,556,604 |
Mutual funds |
|
13,037,790 |
|
|
4,838,131 |
Loans to participants |
|
261,257 |
|
|
56,681 |
Total investments |
|
21,016,983 |
|
|
7,451,416 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables: |
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued income |
|
7,192 |
|
|
1,393 |
Participant contributions |
|
- |
|
|
460 |
Assets available for benefits |
$ |
21,024,175 |
|
$ |
7,453,269 |
See accompanying notes.
2
Statement of Changes in Assets Available for Benefits
Year ended December 31, 2002
Additions |
|
|
|
Interest and dividend income |
$ |
421,499 |
|
Participant contributions |
|
2,158,858 |
|
Employer contributions |
|
495,471 |
|
Transfer from Shoreline Financial Corporation 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan |
|
12,910,099 |
|
Transfer from Bank West 401(k) Plan |
|
592,215 |
|
Total additions |
|
16,578,142 |
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
Benefit payments |
|
1,158,113 |
|
Total deductions |
|
1,158,113 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net realized and unrealized depreciation in |
|
|
|
fair value of investments (Note 3) |
|
(1,849,123 |
) |
Net increase |
|
13,570,906 |
|
|
|
|
|
Assets available for benefits: |
|
|
|
Beginning of year |
|
7,453,269 |
|
End of year |
$ |
21,024,175 |
|
See accompanying notes.
3
Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan
Notes to Financial Statements
1. Description of the Plan
The following description of the Chemical Financial Corporation (the Company) 401(k) Savings Plan (the Plan) provides only general information. Participants should refer to the Plan agreement for a complete description of the Plan's provisions.
As approved by the Board of Directors on October 15, 2001, the Shoreline Financial Corporation 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan and the Bank West 401(k) Plan merged into the Plan effective January 1, 2002. All eligible participants of those plans became participants of the Plan as of that date.
General
The Plan is a defined contribution plan covering all employees who have completed one year of service. The Plan is subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA).
Contributions
Each year, participants may contribute up to 85% of pretax annual compensation not to exceed IRC limitation, as defined in the Plan. Participants may also contribute amounts representing distributions from other qualified defined benefit or defined contribution plans. Effective January 1, 2002, the Company contributes matching contributions equal to 50% of the participant's salary reductions. In determining matching contributions, only salary reductions up to 4% of a participant's compensation will be matched.
Participant Accounts
Each participant's account is credited with the participant's contributions and allocations of (a) the Company's contributions and (b) plan earnings. Participants direct the investment of their accounts among the investment funds offered by the Plan. The benefit to which a participant is entitled is the benefit that can be provided from the participant's account.
Vesting
Participants are immediately vested in their contributions. Matching contributions vest in accordance with the following schedule:
|
Years of Service |
Percentage |
|
|
Less than 3 |
0% |
|
|
3 or more |
100% |
|
4
Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
Participant Loans
Participants may borrow from their fund accounts a minimum of $1,000 up to a maximum equal to the lesser of $50,000 or 50% of their vested account balance. Loan terms range from 1-5 years. The loans are secured by the balance in the participant's account and bear interest at a rate commensurate with local prevailing rates as determined monthly by the plan administrator. Principal and interest are paid ratably through payroll deductions.
Payment of Benefits
On termination of service or upon death, disability or retirement, a participant may request benefit payment. Benefit payments are distributed in lump-sum amount equal to the vested value of the participant's account. Payment of benefits may not be deferred by participants beyond their attainment of age 70-1/2.
2. Summary of Accounting Policies
Investment Valuation
The Plan's investments are stated at fair value. Securities traded on a national securities exchange are valued at the last reported sales price on the last business day of the Plan year. Mutual funds are stated at the quoted market prices which represent the net asset values of shares held by the Plan at year-end. The participant loans are valued at their outstanding balances, which approximate fair value.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires management to make estimates that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
5
Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
2. Summary of Accounting Policies (continued)
Plan Termination
Although it has not expressed the intention to do so, the Company has reserved the right to terminate the Plan at any time by resolution of its Board of Directors subject to the provisions of ERISA. In the event of Plan termination, participants will continue to be 100% vested in their accounts. The value of the participant accounts will be determined as of the effective date of the termination and distributed as provided by the Plan.
Administration
The Company has elected to pay all significant administrative expenses of the Plan.
Reclassifications
Certain amounts previously reported in 2001 have been reclassified to conform with the presentation used in 2002.
3. Investments
During the year ended December 31, 2002, the Plan's investments (including investments purchased, sold, as well as held during the year) (depreciated) appreciated in fair value as determined by quoted market prices as follows:
|
|
Net Realized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mutual funds |
$ |
(2,330,955 |
) |
|
Chemical Financial Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
(1,849,123 |
) |
6
Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
3. Investments (continued)
Investments that represent 5% or more of the Plan's net assets are as follows:
|
December 31 |
|
||||
|
2002 |
|
2001 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Chemical Financial Corporation |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federated Investors Index Fund |
|
2,306,132 |
|
|
2,202,555 |
|
Federated Investors Money Market Fund |
|
1,580,098 |
|
|
489,612 |
|
Federated Investors Fixed Income Fund |
|
1,120,859 |
|
|
** |
|
Federated Investors Middle Cap Stock Fund |
|
1,657,615 |
|
|
** |
|
Federated Investors Magellan Fund |
|
1,590,296 |
|
|
** |
|
Fidelity Investments Growth Stock Fund |
|
1,355,080 |
|
|
** |
|
Fidelity Investments Stock and Bond Fund |
|
1,383,954 |
|
|
799,638 |
|
*Party-in-interest
** Less than 5% of Plan net assets
4. Income Tax Status
The Plan has received a determination letter from the Internal Revenue Service dated August 23, 1994, stating that the Plan is qualified under Section 401(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) and, therefore, the related trust is exempt from taxation. Subsequent to the issuance of the determination letter, the Plan was amended and restated in its entirety. Once qualified, the Plan is required to operate in conformity with the Code to maintain its qualification. The Plan Administrator believes the Plan is being operated in compliance with the applicable requirements of the Code and, therefore, believes that the Plan, as amended and restated, is qualified and the related trust is tax exempt.
7
Supplemental Schedule
Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan
Employer ID # 38-2022454
Plan # 002
Schedule H, Line 4(i)-Schedule of Assets (Held at End of Year)
December 31, 2002
|
|
Description of Investment Including |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Chemical Financial Corporation |
|
Common Stock |
|
$ |
7,717,936 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federated Investors Mutual Funds |
|
Fixed Income Fund |
|
|
1,120,859 |
|
|
Index Fund |
|
|
2,306,132 |
|
|
Middle Cap Stock Fund |
|
|
1,657,615 |
|
|
Value Stock Fund |
|
|
495,391 |
|
|
Money Market Fund |
|
|
1,580,098 |
|
|
Magellan Fund |
|
|
1,590,296 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fidelity Investments |
|
Stock and Bond Fund |
|
|
1,383,954 |
|
|
International Stock Fund |
|
|
525,540 |
|
|
Low-Cost Stock Fund |
|
|
1,022,825 |
|
|
Growth Stock Fund |
|
|
1,355,080 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
*Participant Loans |
|
Interest rate range: 6.57 % to 10.5 %; with |
|
|
|
|
|
various maturity dates |
|
|
261,257 |
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,016,983 |
*Party-in-interest.
Note: Historical cost information is not disclosed since all investments are participant directed.
8
EXHIBIT NO. 99.2
Audited Financial Statements
With Report of Independent Auditors
Chemical Financial Corporation
1998 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary Directors
March 25, 2002
1
Report of Independent Auditors
Plan Administrator
Chemical Financial Corporation
1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors
We have audited the accompanying statements of financial condition of the Chemical Financial Corporation 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors as of March 25, 2002 (date of plan termination) and December 31, 2001 and the related statements of income and changes in plan equity for the period from January 1, 2002 to March 25, 2002 and the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Plan's Administrator. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Plan Administrator, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Chemical Financial Corporation 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors at March 25, 2002 and December 31, 2001 and the results of its operations and changes in its plan equity for the period from January 1, 2002 to March 25, 2002 and the years ended December 31, 2001 and 2000 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Detroit, Michigan
March 7, 2003
2
Chemical Financial Corporation
1998 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary Directors
Statements of Financial Condition
|
|
March 25 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
2002 |
|
|
2001 |
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
729 |
Common stock receivable of Chemical |
|
|
|
|
|
Financial Corporation, at market value - (7,775 shares at a cost |
|
|
|
|
|
of $190,631 at December 31, 2001) |
|
- |
|
|
222,891 |
Total Assets |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
223,620 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Equity |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan equity (43 participants at December 31, 2001) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
223,620 |
See accompanying notes.
3
Chemical Financial Corporation
1998 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary Directors
Statements of Income and Changes in Plan Equity
|
Period from |
|
|
Years Ended |
|
||||||
2001 |
2000 |
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Participant contributions |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
187,275 |
|
$ |
302,625 |
|
Dividend equivalents and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fractional share interests |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
3,529 |
|
|
6,574 |
|
|
|
|
- |
|
|
|
190,804 |
|
|
309,199 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan distributions |
|
|
83,949 |
|
|
|
309,218 |
|
|
271,224 |
|
Transfer to new plan |
|
|
139,671 |
|
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
|
(223,620 |
) |
|
|
(118,414 |
) |
|
37,975 |
|
Net realized appreciation (depreciation) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
in fair value of common stock receivable |
|
|
- |
|
|
|
39,171 |
|
|
(6,909 |
) |
Net increase (decrease) |
|
|
(223,620 |
) |
|
|
(79,243 |
) |
|
31,066 |
|
Plan equity at beginning of period |
|
|
223,620 |
|
|
|
302,863 |
|
|
271,797 |
|
Plan equity at end of period |
|
$ |
- |
|
|
$ |
223,620 |
|
$ |
302,863 |
|
See accompanying notes.
4
Chemical Financial Corporation
1998 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary Directors
Notes to Financial Statements
March 25, 2002
Note 1 - Description of the Plan
The Chemical Financial Corporation 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors (Plan) was implemented by Chemical Financial Corporation (Corporation) on December 14, 1998. The Plan was designed to provide non-employee directors and community bank advisory directors of the Corporation's subsidiaries, who are neither directors or employees of the Corporation, with a convenient method of acquiring Corporation stock. The Plan provided for a maximum of 25,000 shares of the Corporation's common stock, $1.00 par value (Common Stock), subject to adjustments for certain changes in the capital structure of the Corporation as defined in the Plan, to be available under the Plan.
Subsidiary directors and community bank advisory directors, who elected to participate in the Plan, could elect to contribute to the Plan fifty percent or one hundred percent of their board of director fees and/or fifty percent or one hundred percent of their director committee fees, earned as directors or community bank advisory directors of the Corporation's subsidiaries. Participant contributions to the Plan were made by the Corporation's subsidiaries on behalf of each electing participant. As of the last day of each month, each participant's cash account was debited for the purchase of whole shares of the Corporation's stock that was credited to a separate participant stock account. The stock purchased under the Plan during the calendar year was issued by the Corporation directly to the participants in the following calendar year. The Plan provided for dividend equivalents to be credited to each participant's cash account, as of the dividend record date of the Corpor ation's common stock. Dividend equivalents were calculated by multiplying the Corporation's dividend rate by the number of shares of common stock in each participant's stock account, as of the Corporation's dividend record date. The Plan also provided for an appropriate credit to each participant's stock account for stock dividends, stock splits or other distributions of the Corporation's common stock by the Corporation. Fractional shares calculated as a result of the above adjustments were converted to cash based on the market price of the Corporation's common stock, and were credited to each participant's cash account. Plan participants could terminate their participation in the Plan, at any time, by written notice of withdrawal to the Corporation. Participants would cease to be eligible to participate in the Plan when they ceased to serve as directors or community bank advisory directors of subsidiaries of the Corporation. Upon withdrawal from the Plan, each participant received the shares of common stock of the Corporation in their participant stock account and the cash in their participant cash account.
5
Chemical Financial Corporation
1998 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary Directors
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
March 25, 2002
Note 1 - Description of the Plan (continued)
The 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors ("new plan") became effective on March 25, 2002, with the same terms and provisions as the Plan. The remaining common stock receivable outstanding as of December 31, 2001 for 4,847 shares of the Corporation, with a market value of $138,942 and a cost basis of $119,237, and cash of $729 of the Plan were transferred to the new plan on March 25, 2002. As of December 31, 2001, the Plan had 2,928 remaining shares of the Corporation that it was authorized to issue. These shares were issued by the new plan on March 29, 2002 in satisfaction of a portion of the common stock receivable outstanding as of December 31, 2001.
The Corporation reserved the right to terminate or amend the Plan at any time, provided, however, that no termination or amendment would affect or diminish any participant's right to the benefit of contributions made by him/her prior to the date of such amendment or termination.
The Plan provided that all expenses of the Plan and its administration would be paid by the Corporation.
The Plan was not qualified under Sections 401(a) or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Plan did not provide for income taxes because any income was taxable to the participants. Participants in the Plan were required to treat as taxable income the contributions made to the Plan by the Corporation's subsidiaries on their behalf. Dividend equivalents and any other cash credited to the participants' cash accounts were taxable to the participants for Federal and state income tax purposes in the year such dividend equivalent or cash was credited to the participant cash account. Upon disposition of the common stock of the Corporation purchased under the Plan, participants were required to treat any gain or loss as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss depending upon when such disposition occurred.
6
Chemical Financial Corporation
1998 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary Directors
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
March 25, 2002
Note 2 - Summary of Accounting Policies
Valuation of Common Stock Receivable
Common stock receivable of the Corporation was recorded at the market value per share of the Corporation's common stock multiplied by the number of shares receivable at the valuation date. Market value was based on the closing bid price of the Corporation's common stock at year-end ($28.67 per share at December 31, 2001.) The number of shares receivable and the closing bid price as of December 31, 2001 were adjusted for the 5% stock dividend on the Corporation's common stock declared on December 9, 2002 and paid on January 24, 2003 from the new plan.
Income
Dividend equivalents and fractional share interests were accrued on the Corporation's dividend or other record date.
Contributions
Contributions were accounted for on the accrual basis.
7
Chemical Financial Corporation
1998 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary Directors
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
March 25, 2002
Note 3 - Contributions
Contributions for participants by the participating companies were as follows:
|
|
Year Ended December 31 |
|
||||||
Participating Company |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
2000 |
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||
Chemical Bank and Trust Co. |
|
|
$ |
84,850 |
|
|
$ |
167,300 |
|
Chemical Bank Shoreline |
|
|
|
34,925 |
|
|
|
32,475 |
|
Chemical Bank West |
|
|
|
64,700 |
|
|
|
102,150 |
|
CFC Data Corp |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
|
|
700 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Participant Contributions |
|
|
$ |
187,275 |
|
|
$ |
302,625 |
|
8
EXHIBIT NO. 99.3
Audited Financial Statements
With Report of Independent Auditors
Chemical Financial Corporation
2001 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors
December 31, 2002
1
Report of Independent Auditors
Plan Administrator
Chemical Financial Corporation
2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors
We have audited the accompanying statement of financial condition of the Chemical Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors as of December 31, 2002 and the related statement of income and changes in plan equity for the period from March 25, 2002 to December 31, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Plan's Administrator. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the Plan Administrator, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Chemical Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors at December 31, 2002 and the results of its operations and changes in its plan equity for the period from March 25, 2002 to December 31, 2002 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.
s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Detroit, Michigan
March 7, 2003
2
Chemical Financial Corporation
2001 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors
Statement of Financial Condition
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2002 |
|
|
Assets |
|
|
|
Cash |
$ |
799 |
|
Common stock receivable of Chemical |
|
|
|
Financial Corporation, at market value - (6,623 shares at a cost |
|
|
|
of $194,524 at December 31, 2002) |
|
202,601 |
|
Total Assets |
$ |
203,400 |
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Equity |
|
|
|
Plan equity (43 participants at December 31, 2002) |
$ |
203,400 |
|
See accompanying notes.
3
Chemical Financial Corporation
2001 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors
Statement of Income and Changes in Plan Equity
|
|
Period from |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participant contributions |
|
$ |
189,650 |
|
Dividend equivalents and |
|
|
|
|
fractional share interests |
|
4,944 |
|
|
Transfer from prior plan (Note 1) |
|
|
139,671 |
|
|
|
|
334,265 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deductions |
|
|
|
|
Plan distributions |
|
|
138,942 |
|
|
|
|
195,323 |
|
Net unrealized appreciation |
|
|
|
|
in fair value of common stock receivable |
|
|
8,077 |
|
Net increase |
|
|
203,400 |
|
Plan equity at beginning of period |
|
|
- |
|
Plan equity at end of period |
|
$ |
203,400 |
|
See accompanying notes.
4
Chemical Financial Corporation
2001 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors
Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2002
Note 1 - Description of the Plan
The Chemical Financial Corporation 2001 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors (Plan) was made effective by Chemical Financial Corporation (Corporation) on March 25, 2002. The Plan is designed to provide non-employee directors of the Corporation's subsidiaries and community banks, who are neither directors nor employees of the Corporation, with a convenient method of acquiring Corporation stock. The Plan provides for a maximum of 75,000 shares of the Corporation's common stock, $1.00 par value (Common Stock), subject to adjustments for certain changes in the capital structure of the Corporation as defined in the Plan, to be available under the Plan.
Subsidiary directors and community bank directors, who elect to participate in the Plan, may elect to contribute to the Plan fifty percent or one hundred percent of their board of director fees and/or fifty percent or one hundred percent of their director committee fees, earned as directors or community bank directors of the Corporation's subsidiaries. Participant contributions to the Plan are made by the Corporation's subsidiaries on behalf of each electing participant. As of the last day of each month, each participant's cash account is debited for the purchase of whole shares of the Corporation's stock that is credited to a separate participant stock account. The stock purchased under the Plan during the calendar year is issued by the Corporation directly to the participants in the following calendar year. The Plan provides for dividend equivalents to be credited to each participant's cash account as of the dividend record date of the Corporation's common stock. Divid end equivalents are calculated by multiplying the Corporation's dividend rate by the number of shares of common stock in each participant's stock account as of the Corporation's dividend record date. The Plan also provides for an appropriate credit to each participant's stock account for stock dividends, stock splits or other distributions of the Corporation's common stock by the Corporation. Fractional shares calculated as a result of the above adjustments are converted to cash based on the market price of the Corporation's common stock and are credited to each participant's cash account. Plan participants may terminate their participation in the Plan, at any time, by written notice of withdrawal to the Corporation. Participants will cease to be eligible to participate in the Plan when they cease to serve as directors or community bank directors of subsidiaries of the Corporation. Upon withdrawal from the Plan, each participant will receive the shares of common stock of the Corporation in their participant stock account and the cash in their participant cash account.
5
Chemical Financial Corporation
2001 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2002
Note 1 - Description of the Plan (continued)
On March 25, 2002, a common stock receivable for 4,847 shares of the Corporation, with a market value of $138,942 and a cost basis of $119,237, and cash of $729 of the 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors were transferred to the Plan. The 1998 Stock Purchase Plan for Subsidiary Directors had the same terms and provisions as the Plan. As of December 31, 2002, the Plan had 73,903 shares of the Corporation's common stock available for future issuance, adjusted for the 5% stock dividend declared by the Corporation on December 9, 2002 and paid on January 24, 2003.
The Corporation reserves the right to terminate or amend the Plan at any time, provided, however, that no termination or amendment shall affect or diminish any participant's right to the benefit of contributions made by him/her prior to the date of such amendment or termination.
The Plan provides that all expenses of the Plan and its administration shall be paid by the Corporation.
The Plan is not qualified under Sections 401(a) or 501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The Plan does not provide for income taxes because any income is taxable to the participants. Participants in the Plan must treat as taxable income the contributions made to the Plan by the Corporation's subsidiaries on their behalf. Dividend equivalents and any other cash credited to the participants' cash accounts are taxable to the participants for Federal and state income tax purposes in the year such dividend equivalent or cash is credited to the participant cash account. Upon disposition of the common stock of the Corporation purchased under the Plan, participants must treat any gain or loss as long-term or short-term capital gain or loss depending upon when such disposition occurs.
6
Chemical Financial Corporation
2001 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2002
Note 2 - Summary of Accounting Policies
Valuation of Common Stock Receivable
Common stock receivable of the Corporation is recorded at the market value per share of the Corporation's common stock multiplied by the number of shares receivable at the valuation date. Market value is based on the closing bid price of the Corporation's common stock at year end ($30.59 per share at December 31, 2002). The number of shares receivable and the closing bid price as of December 31, 2002 were adjusted for the 5% stock dividend on the Corporation's common stock declared on December 9, 2002 and paid on January 24, 2003.
Income
Dividend equivalents and fractional share interests are accrued on the Corporation's dividend or other record date.
Contributions
Contributions are accounted for on the accrual basis.
7
Chemical Financial Corporation
2001 Stock Purchase Plan
for Subsidiary and Community Bank Directors
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2002
Note 3 - Contributions
Contributions for participants by the participating companies were as follows:
|
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
Participating Company |
|
|
2001 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chemical Bank and Trust Co. |
|
|
$ |
89,550 |
|
Chemical Bank Shoreline |
|
|
|
27,700 |
|
Chemical Bank West |
|
|
|
68,800 |
|
CFC Data Corp |
|
|
|
2,800 |
|
CFC Financial Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
400 |
|
CFC Title Services, Inc. |
|
|
|
400 |
|
Total Participant Contributions |
|
|
$ |
189,650 |
|
8
EXHIBIT NO. 99.4
SHORELINE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
401(k)/PROFIT SHARING PLAN
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2001
SHORELINE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
401(K)/PROFIT SHARING PLAN
Benton Harbor, Michigan
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2001
CONTENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS |
1 |
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
|
STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS AVAILABLE FOR BENEFITS |
2 |
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS AVAILABLE FOR BENEFITS |
3 |
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS |
4 |
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
Administrative Committee
Chemical Financial Corporation
Benton Harbor, Michigan
RE: SHORELINE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 401(k)/PROFIT SHARING PLAN
We have audited the accompanying statements of net assets available for benefits of Shoreline Financial Corporation 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan as of January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2001, and the related statement of changes in net assets available for benefits for the period ended January 1, 2002. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Plan's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the net assets available for benefits of the Plan as of January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2001, and the changes in net assets available for benefits for the period ended January 1, 2002, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
/s/ Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP |
|
Crowe, Chizek and Company LLP |
Grand Rapids, Michigan
May 29, 2002
1.
SHORELINE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 401(k)/PROFIT SHARING PLAN
STATEMENTS OF NET ASSETS AVAILABLE FOR BENEFITS
January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2001
January 1, |
December 31, |
|||||
ASSETS |
||||||
Investments |
||||||
Common stock |
$ |
-- |
$ |
4,510,425 |
||
Shares of registered investment companies |
-- |
8,164,469 |
||||
Loans to Plan participants |
|
-- |
|
227,508 |
||
-- |
12,902,402 |
|||||
Cash |
|
-- |
|
4,776 |
||
NET ASSETS AVAILABLE FOR BENEFITS |
$ |
-- |
$ |
12,907,178 |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
2.
SHORELINE FINANCIAL CORPORATION 401(k)/PROFIT SHARING PLAN
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS AVAILABLE FOR BENEFITS
Period ended January 1, 2002
Deductions from net assets attributed to: |
|||
Transfer to successor plan (Note 5) |
$ |
12,907,180 |
|
Total deductions |
|
12,907,180 |
|
Net decrease |
(12,907,180 |
) |
|
Net assets available for benefits |
|||
Beginning of period |
|
12,907,180 |
|
End of period |
$ |
-- |
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
3.
SHORELINE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
401(k)/PROFIT SHARING PLAN
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2001
NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF PLAN
The following description of the Shoreline Financial Corporation 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan (Plan) provides only general information. Participants should refer to the Plan agreement or Summary Plan Description for a more complete description of the Plan's provisions.
General: The Plan was a profit sharing plan and provided for employee contributions under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. The Plan was subject to the provisions of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 ("ERISA"). Employees with at least one hour of service were entitled to defer a portion of their salary to the plan. After one year of service a participant was entitled to receive an employer match. Two years of service were required before a participant could take part in the profit sharing features of the Plan. A participant was credited with a year of service after completion of 1,000 hours of service during an eligibility period. A participant must have also been at least 18 years of age to become eligible.
Contributions: Plan participants could defer on a pretax basis, up to 15% of their annual gross compensation, as defined in the Plan's document, subject to certain limitations as specified in the Internal Revenue Code. During the period ended January 1, 2002, there were no employee or employer contributions made to the Plan.
Participant Accounts: Each participant's account was credited with the participant's contribution, an allocation of the Company's contribution, if eligible, and plan earnings net of administrative expenses. Allocations were based on participant earnings or account balances, as defined. The benefit to which a participant is entitled is the benefit that can be provided from the participant's account.
Vesting: Participants were 100% vested in employee contributions and income thereon, at all times. Participants became 100% vested in employer contributions after two years.
Payment of Benefits: On termination of service due to death, disability or retirement, a participant may elect to receive an amount equal to the value of the participant's vested interest in his or her account in either a lump-sum amount, or in annual payments, or more frequently if permitted by the Administrator, over an elected period of years not exceeding the life expectancy of the participant or the joint life expectancy of the participant and a beneficiary. For termination of service due to other reasons, a participant may transfer the value of the vested interest in his or her account to the trustee or custodian of another qualified retirement plan or receive a lump-sum distribution.
(Continued)
4.
SHORELINE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
401(k)/PROFIT SHARING PLAN
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2001
NOTE 1 - DESCRIPTION OF PLAN (Continued)
Investment Options: Upon enrollment in the Plan, a participant may direct employee and employer contributions to any of eleven investment options. Participants may change their investment options at any time.
Participant Loans: Participants may borrow from their fund accounts up to a maximum equal to the lesser of $50,000 or 50 percent of their vested account balance. Loan transactions are treated as a transfer to (from) the investment fund from (to) the Loan Fund. The term of the loan shall not exceed five years and shall have a stated maturity date not later than the date of the first expected distribution to the participant. The loan shall bear a reasonable rate of interest which shall be the prevailing rate charged by lenders for a loan of a similar type.
NOTE 2 - SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The policies and principles which significantly affect the determination of net assets and results of operations are summarized below.
Accounting Method: The Plan's financial statements are prepared on a basis of accounting in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
Investment Valuation and Income Recognition: The Plan's investments are stated at fair value. Quoted market prices are used to value investments. Shares of registered investment companies are valued at the net asset value of shares held by the Plan at year-end. Loans to Plan participants are stated at cost which approximates fair value.
Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on a trade-date basis. Interest income is recorded on the accrual basis. Dividends are recorded on the ex-dividend date.
Estimates: The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires the plan administrator to make estimates and assumptions that affect certain reported amounts and disclosures, and actual results may differ from these estimates.
Payment of Benefits: Benefits are recorded when paid.
(Continued)
5.
SHORELINE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
401(k)/PROFIT SHARING PLAN
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2001
NOTE 3 - INVESTMENTS
The following presents investments that represent 5 percent or more of the Plan's net assets at December 31, 2001. There were no plan assets at January 1, 2002.
Units or |
|
||||
Shares of Registered Investment Companies |
|||||
Federated Investors Money Market |
899,615 |
$ |
899,615 |
||
Federated Max-Cap Index fund |
32,255 |
750,901 |
|||
Federated Mid-Cap Index fund |
76,511 |
1,294,568 |
|||
Fidelity Magellan fund |
18,065 |
1,882,691 |
|||
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth fund |
33,968 |
1,458,579 |
|||
Chemical Financial Corporation common stock |
149,848 |
4,510,425 |
NOTE 4 - TAX STATUS
The Shoreline Financial Corporation 401(k)/Profit Sharing Plan is a prototype plan, and uses a standardized Plan document sponsored by Chemical Bank & Trust Company (Chemical). The Internal Revenue Service has determined and informed Chemical by letter dated February 8, 1993, that the prototype plan is designed in accordance with the applicable sections of the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) for tax exempt status. The Plan Administrator believes the Plan is being operated in accordance with the terms of the Plan document
NOTE 5 - PLAN MERGER
Effective January 1, 2002, all assets of the Plan were merged into the Chemical Financial Corporation 401(k) Savings Plan. For compliance purposes, this was treated as a trustee-to-trustee transfer.
(Continued)
6.
SHORELINE FINANCIAL CORPORATION
401(k)/PROFIT SHARING PLAN
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2001
NOTE 6 - PARTY-IN-INTEREST TRANSACTIONS
Parties-in-interest are defined under Department of Labor Regulations as any fiduciary of the Plan, any party rendering service to the Plan, the employer and certain others. Professional fees for the administration and audit of the Plan were paid by the Company.
The Plan held the following party-in-interest investments (at fair value):
January 1, |
December 31, |
||||
Chemical Financial Corporation common stock, 0 and |
|||||
149,848 shares, respectively |
$ |
-- |
$ |
4,510,425 |
7.
-"D5:,X@S*].!0F3\+4HQ(M>K$BB$=)FW*].E6
M@SRKBAW[4:%6KCK/@EU)]F/2HVRM?B7X-"K:C2-]&HS;5N;%IV/U2F5YUZ1#
MNWS;KC#J,+#=PX4QLB(\N&]$NQ@;.]Y).;)!R`03*WZI>?/`H8(]"P0M$+#E
MGC5+CYU[C75AU)5?P[;Y.O6UR9B#3EY,4+9EXC8GO_XY_&[ST[JI!D>I_#C=
MSL*Q5X_NEZGQP->1Z_]\+E!T7]]`MY^_3IOF"O'?^[8/:GZL2^!IX7-_.!UH
M?/O0]9>10Z'M)UYD_UE5($WXM6:@:M?I!M^!'`%PWWX`0%A0@E2)UYUA'NXG
M(%KJR1>@22,5M]]\$'(HW4!64'B1A3`^J"%8^Q7'XF?(E6C9B)'9^!N-DA%9
MFY`W%H2A2^\-^%5]9"6)$(89#F2D4U4*A.&.-U+YI(P#%54>AE).225!5UZ'
MYHIE[D7EAS$B)"9,9+:96YU:3ND2AF`FZ6-T7\T)(W)0`FAGF&]"!)U!'YYY
MZ&J)0O35E9-!Q^:C?PJ94WE/+HEII%0M:N6D>-KI(J!6[FDI=URJ5JBF6\7_
M.6:.AV::J*B;>JH44KSVZBNDH%8UJ99[
@6G[.F8(F"!4DD'OWFR\U.;-IYP%QI2(4&MBR3"%!E9M>?0U
MJ5%#.ZP+TK-@VA`WRF4HE6!4JH9I/MUMT'5JRJ.#*B<<]>EBI$VM-/;,^*K9
MZ3)3JHUH''A,VZQ3]O\\&)VDQNT";>\N[5ANVJ">TW]]"G;\8,@J-:?_;)SZ
M<\%F$2>:3%\!A]-&.,&GWWYZQ4>88+OUUII;&%X%4KH?1;=YIU=S'`[(
MX&,,@1<@=PD"B-=76&EFGEDL/GC3ADFQ-I"$,CY6(6=2V823A4I5N%E6KWED
M6VA'G2B1BDK&A=17'C7G66S>K02=8P#LE25O)+[&UT-ZM>CE"@AR."23'))I
MXT-34A0@7;H!AUE,+%K'4GX`6HEC:PI)]Y9*PWD4V6J;S2;8G6=5*=IF)B87
M'FY8"HB24QD"N)"0CKIEXG"@*A3