EX-13 5 a51283782ex13.htm EXHIBIT 13 a51283782ex13.htm
EXHIBIT 13
 
 
Financial Review

Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
75
Consolidated Statement of Income
76
Consolidated Balance Sheet
77
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
78
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
79
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
80
Unaudited Summary of Quarterly Results
101
Selected Financial Data
103
Unaudited Consolidating Statements of Income
104
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations
107


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

    The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
The Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on the framework established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, as stated in their report which appears on page 75.
 
 
74

 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Chemed Corporation:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Chemed Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2015 and 2014, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.  We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 

 



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Cincinnati, OH
February 26, 2016

 
75

 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
                   
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                 
(in thousands, except per share data)
                 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
                   
Service revenues and sales
  $ 1,543,388     $ 1,456,282     $ 1,413,329  
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation)
    1,087,610       1,034,673       1,008,808  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    237,821       222,589       215,564  
Depreciation
    32,369       29,881       27,698  
Amortization
    1,130       720       1,644  
Other operating expenses (Note 21)
    -       -       26,221  
Total costs and expenses
    1,358,930       1,287,863       1,279,935  
Income from operations
    184,458       168,419       133,394  
Interest expense
    (3,645 )     (8,186 )     (15,035 )
Other income/(expenses)--net (Note 10)
    (687 )     2,521       5,470  
Income before income taxes
    180,126       162,754       123,829  
Income taxes (Note 11)
    (69,852 )     (63,437 )     (46,602 )
Net Income
  $ 110,274     $ 99,317     $ 77,227  
                         
Earnings Per Share (Note 15)
                       
Net Income
  $ 6.54     $ 5.79     $ 4.24  
Average number of shares outstanding
    16,870       17,165       18,199  
Diluted Earnings Per Share (Note 15)
                       
Net Income
  $ 6.33     $ 5.57     $ 4.16  
Average number of shares outstanding
    17,422       17,840       18,585  
 
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
 
 
76

 
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
 
       
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
           
(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
           
December 31,
 
2015
   
2014
 
Assets
           
Current assets
           
Cash and cash equivalents (Note 9)
  $ 14,727     $ 14,132  
Accounts receivable less allowances of  $13,244 (2014 - $14,728)
    106,262       124,607  
Inventories
    6,314       6,168  
Current deferred income taxes (Note 11)
    -       15,414  
Prepaid income taxes
    10,653       2,787  
Prepaid expenses
    12,852       11,456  
Total current assets
    150,808       174,564  
Investments of deferred compensation plans held in trust (Notes 14 and 16)
    49,481       49,147  
Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation (Note 12)
    117,370       105,336  
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of  $32,866 (2014 - $32,772) (Note 6)
    55,111       56,027  
Goodwill
    472,322       466,722  
Other assets
    7,233       8,136  
Total Assets
  $ 852,325     $ 859,932  
                 
Liabilities
               
Current liabilities
               
Accounts payable
  $ 43,695     $ 46,849  
Current portion of long-term debt (Note 3)
    7,500       6,250  
Income taxes (Note 11)
    -       5,818  
Accrued insurance
    43,972       40,814  
Accrued compensation
    52,817       50,718  
Accrued legal
    1,233       753  
Other current liabilities
    22,119       24,352  
Total current liabilities
    171,336       175,554  
Deferred income taxes (Note 11)
    21,041       29,945  
Long-term debt (Note 3)
    83,750       141,250  
Deferred compensation liabilities (Note 14)
    49,467       48,684  
Other liabilities
    13,478       13,143  
Total Liabilities
    339,072       408,576  
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13 and 18)
               
Stockholders' Equity
               
Capital stock - authorized 80,000,000 shares $1 par; issued 33,985,316 shares
               
(2014 - 33,337,297 shares)
    33,985       33,337  
Paid-in capital
    603,006       538,845  
Retained earnings
    865,845       771,176  
Treasury stock - 17,187,540 shares (2014 - 16,446,572 shares), at cost
    (991,978 )     (894,285 )
Deferred compensation payable in Company stock (Note 14)
    2,395       2,283  
Total Stockholders' Equity
    513,253       451,356  
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
  $ 852,325     $ 859,932  
 
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
 
 
77

 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 
   
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                 
(in thousands)
                 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
                 
Net income
  $ 110,274     $ 99,317     $ 77,227  
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
                       
Depreciation and amortization
    33,499       30,601       29,342  
Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable
    14,247       13,173       10,907  
Noncash portion of long-term incentive compensation
    6,644       2,569       1,301  
Provision/(benefit) for deferred income taxes (Note 11)
    6,325       6,978       (6,988 )
Stock option expense
    5,445       4,802       6,042  
Amortization of restricted stock awards
    2,107       2,471       3,046  
Directors' stock awards
    540       480       480  
Amortization of debt issuance costs
    523       826       1,751  
Amortization of discount on convertible notes
    -       3,392       8,674  
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding amounts acquired in business combinations:
                       
Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable
    4,132       (45,785 )     (9,009 )
Decrease/(increase) in inventories
    (142 )     535       355  
Decrease/(increase) in prepaid expenses
    (1,290 )     6,362       (6,317 )
Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities
    476       (26,304 )     39,860  
Increase/(decrease) in income taxes
    344       11,279       (2,461 )
Increase in other assets
    (47 )     (4,769 )     (6,507 )
Increase in other liabilities
    1,320       8,484       6,713  
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
    (14,042 )     (5,172 )     (3,982 )
Other sources
    1,145       1,040       413  
Net cash provided by operating activities
    171,500       110,279       150,847  
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
                       
Capital expenditures
    (44,135 )     (43,571 )     (29,324 )
Business combinations, net of cash acquired (Note 7)
    (6,614 )     (250 )     (2,257 )
Other sources
    432       294       235  
Net cash used by investing activities
    (50,317 )     (43,527 )     (31,346 )
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
                       
Payments on revolving line of credit
    (153,200 )     (336,350 )     -  
Proceeds from revolving line of credit
    103,200       386,350       -  
Purchases of treasury stock
    (59,323 )     (110,019 )     (92,911 )
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation
    (15,734 )     (7,524 )     (5,348 )
Dividends paid
    (15,605 )     (14,255 )     (14,148 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options (Note 4)
    15,424       23,910       17,122  
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
    14,042       5,172       3,982  
Payments on other long-term debt
    (6,250 )     (189,456 )     -  
Increase/(decrease) in cash overdraft payable
    (1,177 )     9,714       (11,415 )
Proceeds from other long-term debt
    -       100,000       -  
Retirement of warrants
    -       (2,648 )     -  
Debt issuance costs
    -       (914 )     (1,108 )
Other uses
    (1,965 )     (1,018 )     (788 )
Net cash used by financing activities
    (120,588 )     (137,038 )     (104,614 )
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    595       (70,286 )     14,887  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    14,132       84,418       69,531  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 14,727     $ 14,132     $ 84,418  
 
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
 
 
78

 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES
 
IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
   
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                                   
(in thousands, except per share data)
                         
Deferred
       
                           
Compensation
       
                     
Treasury
   
Payable in
       
   
Capital
   
Paid-in
   
Retained
   
Stock-
   
Company
       
   
Stock
   
Capital
   
Earnings
   
at Cost
   
Stock
   
Total
 
Balance at December 31, 2012
  $ 31,589     $ 437,364     $ 623,035     $ (640,732 )   $ 2,035     $ 453,291  
Net income
    -       -       77,227       -       -       77,227  
Dividends paid ($.76 per share)
    -       -       (14,148 )     -       -       (14,148 )
Stock awards and exercise of stock options (Note 4)
    656       44,366       -       (18,851 )     -       26,171  
Purchases of treasury stock (Note 20)
    -       -       -       (92,911 )     -       (92,911 )
Other
    -       (719 )     -       (140 )     119       (740 )
Balance at December 31, 2013
    32,245       481,011       686,114       (752,634 )     2,154       448,890  
Net income
    -       -       99,317       -       -       99,317  
Dividends paid ($.84 per share)
    -       -       (14,255 )     -       -       (14,255 )
Stock awards and exercise of stock options (Note 4)
    809       61,469       -       (31,237 )     -       31,041  
Purchases of treasury stock (Note 20)
    -       -       -       (110,019 )     -       (110,019 )
Retirement of warrants
    -       (2,645 )     -       -       -       (2,645 )
Other
    283       (990 )     -       (395 )     129       (973 )
Balance at December 31, 2014
    33,337       538,845       771,176       (894,285 )     2,283       451,356  
Net income
    -       -       110,274       -       -       110,274  
Dividends paid ($.92 per share)
    -       -       (15,605 )     -       -       (15,605 )
Stock awards and exercise of stock options (Note 4)
    648       66,077       -       (38,257 )     -       28,468  
Purchases of treasury stock (Note 20)
    -       -       -       (59,323 )     -       (59,323 )
Other
    -       (1,916 )     -       (113 )     112       (1,917 )
Balance at December 31, 2015
  $ 33,985     $ 603,006     $ 865,845     $ (991,978 )   $ 2,395     $ 513,253  
 
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
 
 
79

 
 
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


1.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
We operate through our two wholly-owned subsidiaries: VITAS Healthcare Corporation (“VITAS”) and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. (“Roto-Rooter”). VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps make terminally ill patients' final days as comfortable as possible. Through its team of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their families. Roto-Rooter provides plumbing, drain cleaning and water restoration services to both residential and commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing, drain cleaning service and water restoration to approximately 90% of the U.S. population.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chemed Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.
 
We have analyzed the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) authoritative guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities relative to our contractual relationships with Roto-Rooter’s independent contractors and franchisees.  The guidance requires the primary beneficiary of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) to consolidate the accounts of the VIE.  Based upon the guidance provided by the FASB, we have concluded that neither the independent contractors nor the franchisees are VIEs.

CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash equivalents comprise short-term, highly liquid investments, including money market funds that have original maturities of three months or less.

ACCOUNTS AND LOANS RECEIVABLE
Accounts and loans receivable are recorded at the principal balance outstanding less estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts.  For the Roto-Rooter segment, allowances for trade accounts receivable are generally provided for accounts more than 90 days past due, although collection efforts continue beyond that time.  Due to the small number of loans receivable outstanding, allowances for loan losses are determined on a case-by-case basis.  For the VITAS segment, allowances for accounts receivable are provided on accounts based on expected collection rates by payer types. The expected collection rate is based on both historical averages and known current trends.  Final write-off of overdue accounts or loans receivable is made when all reasonable collection efforts have been made and payment is not forthcoming.  We closely monitor our receivables and periodically review procedures for granting credit to attempt to hold losses to a minimum.

  We make appropriate provisions to reduce our accounts receivable balance for any governmental or other payer reviews resulting in denials of patient service revenue.  We believe our hospice programs comply with all payer requirements at the time of billing.  However, we cannot predict whether future billing reviews or similar audits by payers will result in material denials or reductions in revenue.

CONCENTRATION OF RISK
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, approximately 49% and 61%, respectively, of VITAS’ total accounts receivable balance were due from Medicare and 41% and 31%, respectively, of VITAS’ total accounts receivable balance were due from various state Medicaid programs.  Combined accounts receivable from Medicare and Medicaid represent approximately 80% of the consolidated net accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2015.
 
As further described in Note 19, we have agreements with one vendor to provide specified pharmacy services for VITAS and its hospice patients.  In 2015 and 2014, respectively, purchases made from this vendor represent in excess of 90% of all pharmacy services used by VITAS.

 
80

 
 
INVENTORIES
Substantially all of the inventories are either general merchandise or finished goods.  Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.  For determining the value of inventories, cost methods that reasonably approximate the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method are used.

DEPRECIATION AND PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT
Depreciation of properties and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the remaining lease terms (excluding option terms) or their useful lives.  Expenditures for maintenance, repairs, renewals and betterments that do not materially prolong the useful lives of the assets are expensed as incurred. The cost of property retired or sold and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is reflected currently in other income, net.

Expenditures for major software purchases and software developed for internal use are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  For software developed for internal use, external direct costs for materials and services and certain internal payroll and related fringe benefit costs are capitalized in accordance with the FASB’s authoritative guidance on accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use.
 
The weighted average lives of our property and equipment at December 31, 2015, were:
 
 
Buildings and building improvements
10.9
 yrs.
 
Transportation equipment
10.8
 
 
Machinery and equipment
5.4
 
 
Computer software
4.6
 
 
Furniture and fixtures
4.8
 

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The table below shows a rollforward of Goodwill (in thousands):
 
   
Vitas
   
Roto-
Rooter
   
Total
 
Balance at December 31, 2013
  $ 328,450     $ 138,421     $ 466,871  
Business combinations
    -       198       198  
Foreign currency adjustments
    -       (198 )     (198 )
Program closing
    (149 )     -       (149 )
Balance at December 31, 2014
  $ 328,301     $ 138,421     $ 466,722  
Business combinations
    -       5,944       5,944  
Foreign currency adjustments
    -       (344 )     (344 )
Balance at December 31, 2015
  $ 328,301     $ 144,021     $ 472,322  
 
Identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets arise from purchase business combinations and are amortized using either an accelerated method or the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The selection of an amortization method is based on which method best reflects the economic pattern of usage of the asset.  The weighted average lives of our identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 2015, were:
 
 
Covenants not to compete
6.5
 yrs.
 
Reaquired franchise rights
6.1
 
 
Referral networks
10.0
 
 
Customer lists
13.3
 

The date of our annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis is October 1.  The VITAS trade name is considered to have an indefinite life.  We also capitalize the direct costs of obtaining licenses to operate either hospice programs or plumbing operations subject to a minimum capitalization threshold.  These costs are amortized over the life of the license using the straight line method.  Certificates of Need (“CON”), which are required in certain states for hospice operations, are generally granted without expiration and thus, we believe them to be indefinite-lived assets subject to impairment testing.

 
81

 
 
We consider that Roto-Rooter Corp. (“RRC”), Roto-Rooter Services Co. (“RRSC”) and VITAS are appropriate reporting units for testing goodwill impairment.  We consider RRC and RRSC separate reporting units but one operating segment.  This is appropriate as they each have their own set of general ledger accounts that can be analyzed at “one level below an operating segment” per the definition of a reporting unit in FASB guidance.

We completed our qualitative analysis for impairment of goodwill and our indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2015.  Based on our assessment, we do not believe that it is more likely than not that our reporting units or indefinite-lived assets fair values are less than their carrying values.

LONG-LIVED ASSETS
If we believe a triggering event may have occurred that indicates a possible impairment of our long-lived assets, we perform an estimate and valuation of the future benefits of our long-lived assets (other than goodwill, the VITAS trade name and capitalized CON costs) based on key financial indicators. If the projected undiscounted cash flows of a major business unit indicate that properties and equipment or identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets have been impaired, a write-down to fair value is made.

OTHER ASSETS
Debt issuance costs are included in other assets.  Issuance costs related to revolving credit agreements are amortized using the straight line method, over the life of the agreement.  All other issuance costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the life of the debt.

REVENUE RECOGNITION
Both the VITAS segment and Roto-Rooter segment recognize service revenues and sales when the earnings process has been completed.  Generally, this occurs when services are provided or products are delivered.  Sales of Roto-Rooter products, including drain cleaning machines and drain cleaning solution, comprise less than 3% of our total service revenues and sales for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2015.

CHARITY CARE
VITAS provides charity care, in certain circumstances, to patients without charge when management of the hospice program determines that the patient does not have the financial wherewithal to make payment.  There is no revenue or associated accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to charity care.
 
The cost of providing charity care during the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, was $7.6 million, $7.3 million and $7.5 million, respectively and is included in cost of services provided and goods sold.  The cost of charity care is calculated by taking the ratio of charity care days to total days of care and multiplying by total cost of care.

SALES TAX
The Roto-Rooter segment collects sales tax from customers when required by state and federal laws.  We record the amount of sales tax collected net in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.

GUARANTEES
In the normal course of business, Roto-Rooter enters into various guarantees and indemnifications in our relationships with customers and others.  These arrangements include guarantees of services for periods ranging from one day to one year and product satisfaction guarantees.  At December 31, 2015 and 2014, our accrual for service guarantees and warranty claims was $340,000 and $350,000 respectively.

OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation) includes salaries, wages and benefits of service providers and field personnel, material costs, medical supplies and equipment, pharmaceuticals, insurance costs, service vehicle costs and other expenses directly related to providing service revenues or generating sales.  Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries, wages, stock-based compensation expense and benefits of selling, marketing and administrative employees, advertising expenses, communications and branch telephone expenses, office rent and operating costs, legal, banking and professional fees and other administrative costs.  The cost associated with VITAS sales personnel is included in cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation).

 
82

 
 
ADVERTISING
We expense the production costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place.  The costs of telephone directory listings are expensed when the directories are placed in circulation.  These directories are generally in circulation for approximately one year, at which point they are typically replaced by the publisher with a new directory.  We generally pay for directory placement assuming it is in circulation for one year.  If the directory is in circulation for less than or greater than one year, we receive a credit or additional billing, as necessary.  We do not control the timing of when a new directory is placed in circulation.  We pay for and expense the cost of internet advertising and placement on a “per click” basis.  Advertising expense for the year ended December 31, 2015, was $36.4 million (2014 – $32.8 million; 2013 - $31.0 million).

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of shares of capital stock outstanding.  Diluted earnings per share reflect the dilutive impact of our outstanding stock options and nonvested stock awards.  Stock options whose exercise price is greater than the average market price of our stock are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period on a straight-line basis.
 
INSURANCE ACCRUALS
For our Roto-Rooter segment and Corporate Office, we initially self-insure for all casualty insurance claims (workers’ compensation, auto liability and general liability).  As a result, we closely monitor and frequently evaluate our historical claims experience to estimate the appropriate level of accrual for self-insured claims.  Our third-party administrator (“TPA”) processes and reviews claims on a monthly basis.  Currently, our exposure on any single claim is capped at $750,000.  In developing our estimates, we accumulate historical claims data for the previous 10 years to calculate loss development factors (“LDF”) by insurance coverage type.  LDFs are applied to known claims to estimate the ultimate potential liability for known and unknown claims for each open policy year.  LDFs are updated annually.  Because this methodology relies heavily on historical claims data, the key risk is whether the historical claims are an accurate predictor of future claims exposure.  The risk also exists that certain claims have been incurred and not reported on a timely basis.  To mitigate these risks, in conjunction with our TPA, we closely monitor claims to ensure timely accumulation of data and compare claims trends with the industry experience of our TPA.

For the VITAS segment, we initially self-insure for workers’ compensation claims.  Currently, VITAS’ exposure on any single claim is capped at $1,000,000. For VITAS’ self-insurance accruals for workers’ compensation, the valuation methods used are similar to those used internally for our other business units.  We are also insured for other risks with respect to professional liability with a deductible of $750,000.

Our casualty insurance liabilities are recorded gross before any estimated recovery for amounts exceeding our stop loss limits.  Estimated recoveries from insurance carriers are recorded as accounts receivable.

TAXES ON INCOME
Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.  Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amount of assets and liabilities and their tax basis.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in our opinion, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized due to insufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward period available under the tax laws. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in laws and rates on the date of enactment.
 
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17 which simplifies the balance sheet classification required for deferred tax balances.  It allows for a company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities to be netted into a noncurrent account, either asset or liability, by jurisdiction.  The ASU is required to be adopted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and the interim periods within that annual period.  Early adoption is permitted.  Companies have the choice to adopt prospectively or retrospectively.  In order to simplify our balance sheet classification required for deferred tax balances, we adopted the ASU for our annual balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 on a prospective basis.  Prior periods have not been retrospectively adjusted.  We do not believe that this change results in a material comparability issue between years on our balance sheet

 
83

 
 
We are subject to income taxes in Canada, U.S. federal and most state jurisdictions.  Significant judgment is required to determine our provision for income taxes.  Our financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of such uncertain positions assuming the taxing authorities’ full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.

CONTINGENCIES
As discussed in Note 18, we are subject to various lawsuits and claims in the normal course of our business.  In addition, we periodically receive communications from governmental and regulatory agencies concerning compliance with Medicare and Medicaid billing requirements at our VITAS subsidiary.  We establish reserves for specific, uninsured liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal action that we deem to be probable and estimable.  We record legal fees associated with legal and regulatory actions as the costs are incurred.  We disclose material loss contingencies that are probable but not reasonably estimable and those that are at least reasonably possible.

ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Disclosures of aftertax expenses and adjustments are based on estimates of the effective income tax rates for the applicable segments.

CLASSIFICATION ADJUSTMENTS
In 2015, we classified $2.1 million of non-cash restricted stock award amortization in selling, general and administrative expenses.  We also recorded classifications adjustments of $2.5 million and $3.0 million to decrease amortization and increase selling, general and administrative expenses in our Consolidated Statement of Income for 2014 and 2013, respectively, related to non-cash restricted stock award amortization.  This classification adjustment does not impact income from operations, income before income taxes, net income, earnings per share, net cash provided by operating activities or our Consolidated Balance Sheet.  We believe the impact of the classification adjustments are immaterial to our consolidated financial statements for the current and prior periods.

2.
Hospice Revenue Recognition
VITAS recognizes revenue at the estimated realizable amount due from third-party payers, which are primarily Medicare and Medicaid.  Payers may deny payment for services in whole or in part on the basis that such services are not eligible for coverage and do not qualify for reimbursement.  We estimate denials each period and make adequate provision in the financial statements.  The estimate of denials is based on historical trends and known circumstances and does not vary materially from period to period on an aggregate basis.  Medicare billings are subject to certain limitations, as described below.

The allowance for doubtful accounts for VITAS comprises the following (in thousands):
 
   
Medicare
   
Medicaid
   
Commercial
   
Other
   
Total
 
Beginning Balance January 1, 2013
  $ 3,875     $ 5,194     $ 2,204     $ 22     $ 11,295  
Bad debt provision
    1,901       4,902       2,026       1,992       10,821  
Write-offs
    (1,452 )     (4,342 )     (2,877 )     (1,269 )     (9,940 )
Other/Contractual adjustments
    490       145       684       (445 )     874  
Ending Balance December 31, 2014
    4,814       5,899       2,037       300       13,050  
Bad debt provision
    286       8,096       2,969       2       11,353  
Write-offs
    (1,863 )     (8,089 )     (2,819 )     (642 )     (13,413 )
Other/Contractual adjustments
    562       93       687       (174 )     1,168  
Ending Balance December 31, 2015
  $ 3,799     $ 5,999     $ 2,874     $ (514 )   $ 12,158  

VITAS is subject to certain limitations on Medicare payments for services.  Specifically, if the number of inpatient care days any hospice program provides to Medicare beneficiaries exceeds 20% of the total days of hospice care such program provided to all Medicare patients for an annual period beginning September 28, the days in excess of the 20% figure may be reimbursed only at the routine homecare rate.  None of VITAS’ hospice programs exceeded the payment limits on inpatient services in 2015, 2014 or 2013.

VITAS is also subject to a Medicare annual per-beneficiary cap (“Medicare cap”).  Compliance with the Medicare cap is measured in one of two ways based on a provider election.  The “streamlined” method compares total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by that Medicare provider number between November 1 of each year and October 31 of the following year with the product of the per-beneficiary cap amount and the number of Medicare beneficiaries electing hospice care for the first time from that hospice program or programs from September 28 through September 27 of the following year.

 
84

 
 
The “proportional” method compares the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by the Medicare provider number between September 28 and September 27 of the following year with the product of the per beneficiary cap amount and a pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving hospice services from that program during the same period.  The pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries is calculated based on the ratio of days the beneficiary received hospice services during the measurement period to the total number of days the beneficiary received hospice services.

We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific admission, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether revenues are likely to exceed the annual per-beneficiary Medicare cap.  Should we determine that revenues for a program are likely to exceed the Medicare cap based on projected trends, we attempt to institute corrective actions, which include changes to the patient mix and increased patient admissions.  However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare cap, we estimate the amount of revenue recognized during the period that will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare cap and record the amount as a reduction to service revenue.

During the year ended December 31, 2015 we recorded a $165,000 Medicare cap reversal of amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2014 for one program’s projected 2015 measurement period liability.  During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded a net  Medicare cap liability of $1.3 million for two programs’ projected 2014 and 2015 measurement period liability offset by the reversal of one program’s 2011 measurement period projected Medicare cap liability.     During the year ended December 31, 2013, we reversed the Medicare cap liability for amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 for three programs’ projected 2013 measurement period liability.  During 2013 this reversal was offset by the Medicare cap liability for two programs’ projected 2014 measurement period liability. The net pretax expense/(income) was ($165,000),  $1.3 million, and $7.0 million for fiscal years 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

In 2013, the U.S. government implemented automatic budget reductions of 2.0% for all government payees, including hospice benefits paid under the Medicare program.  In 2015, CMS determined that the Medicare cap should be calculated “as if” sequestration did not occur.  As a result of this decision, VITAS has received notification from our third party intermediary that an additional $1.9 million is owed for Medicare cap in two programs arising during the 2013 and 2014 measurement periods.  The amounts are automatically deducted from our semi-monthly PIP payments.  We do not believe that CMS is authorized under the sequestration authority or the statutory methodology for establishing the Medicare cap to the amounts they have withheld and intend to withhold under their current “as if” methodology.  We have not recorded a reserve as of December 31, 2015 for the $1.9 million potential exposure.  We have appealed CMS’s methodology change with the appropriate regulatory appeal board.

Shown below is the Medicare cap liability activity for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, (in thousands):

   
2015
   
2014
 
Beginning Balance January 1,
  $ 6,112     $ 8,260  
2015 measurement period
    (165 )     165  
2014 measurement period
    -       1,451  
2011 measurement period
    -       (325 )
Payments
    (4,782 )     (3,439 )
Ending Balance December 31,
  $ 1,165     $ 6,112  
 
3.
Long-Term Debt and Lines of Credit
          On May 15, 2014, we retired our Senior Convertible Notes (the “Notes”) outstanding.  We paid the $187.0 million of principal outstanding using a combination of cash on hand and our existing revolving credit facility.  In addition, we issued 249,000 Chemed shares in conjunction with the conversion feature of the Notes.  At the time we issued the Notes, we had entered into a purchased call transaction to offset any potential economic dilution resulting from the conversion feature in the Notes.  As a result, we received 266,000 Chemed shares from the exercise of the purchased call transaction.  The issuance of shares under the conversion feature of the Notes, as well as the receipt of shares from the purchased call transaction were recorded as adjustments to paid-in capital during 2014.
 
 
85

 
 
At the time we issued the Notes we also sold warrants for the right to purchase approximately 2,477,000 Chemed shares in the future. During 2014, we settled these warrants with one counterparty representing half of the total warrants issued for $2.6 million in cash. The amount paid was recorded as an adjustment to paid-in capital. During 2014, Chemed’s stock price exceeded the exercise price of the remaining outstanding sold warrants resulting in the Company, on December 8, 2014, issuing 35,166 of common shares to the other counterparty in full settlement of the warrants. Pursuant to authoritative guidance, the settlement of the sold warrants was accounted for as an equity transaction.

On June 30, 2014, we replaced our existing credit agreement with the Third Amended and Restated Credit Agreement (“2014 Credit Agreement”).  Terms of the 2014 Credit Agreement consist of a five-year, $350 million revolving credit facility and a $100 million term loan.  The 2014 Credit Agreement has a floating interest rate that is currently LIBOR plus 113 basis points.

The debt outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014 consists of the following (in thousands):
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
 
Revolver
  $ -     $ 50,000  
Term loan
    91,250       97,500  
Total
    91,250       147,500  
Current portion of term loan
    (7,500 )     (6,250 )
Long-term debt
  $ 83,750     $ 141,250  

Scheduled principal payments of the term loan are as follows:

2016
  $ 7,500  
2017
    8,750  
2018
    10,000  
2019
    65,000  
    $ 91,250  
 
Capitalized interest was not material for any of the periods shown.  Summarized below are the total amounts of interest paid during the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
 
2015
    $ 2,988  
2014
      4,322  
2013
      4,744  

Debt issuance costs associated with the existing credit agreement were not written off as the lenders and their relative percentage participation in the facility did not change. With respect to the 2014 Credit Agreement, deferred financing costs were $0.9 million.  The 2014 Credit Agreement contains the following quarterly financial covenants:
 
Description
 
Requirement
 
Chemed
         
         
Leverage Ratio (Consolidated Indebtedness/Consolidated  Adj. EBITDA)
 
< 3.50 to 1.00
 
0.54 to 1.00
         
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Consolidated Free Cash Flow/Consolidated
       
Fixed Charges)
 
> 1.50 to 1.00
 
2.18 to 1.00
         
Annual Operating Lease Commitment
 
< $50.0 million
 
$25.5 million

We are in compliance with all debt covenants as of December 31, 2015. We have issued $37.8 million in standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2015 for insurance purposes. Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the 2014 Credit Agreement. As of December 31, 2015, we have approximately $312.2 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility.
 
 
86

 
 
4.
Stock-Based Compensation Plans
We have three stock incentive plans under which 6.8 million shares can be issued to key employees and directors through a grant of stock options, stock awards and/or performance stock units (“PSUs”).  The Compensation/Incentive Committee (“CIC”) of the Board of Directors administers these plans.
 
We grant stock options, stock awards and PSUs to our officers, other key employees and directors to better align their long-term interests with those of our shareholders.  We grant stock options at an exercise price equal to the market price of our stock on the date of grant.  Options vest evenly annually over a three-year period.  Those granted in 2015 have a contractual life of 5 years; those granted prior to 2015 have a contractual life of 10 years.  Restricted stock awards granted in 2015 vest ratably annually over a three year period; previous restricted stock awards generally cliff vest over a three- or four-year period.  Unrestricted stock awards generally are granted to our non-employee directors annually at the time of our annual meeting.  PSUs are contingent upon achievement of multi-year earnings targets or market targets.  Upon achievement of targets, PSUs are converted to unrestricted shares of Capital stock.

We recognize the cost of stock options, stock awards and PSUs on a straight-line basis over the service life of the award, generally the vesting period.  We include the cost of all stock-based compensation in selling, general and administrative expense.
 
In May 2015, the CIC granted 4,437 unrestricted shares of Capital stock to the Company’s outside directors.
 
PERFORMANCE AWARDS
In November 2013, February 2014 and February 2015, the CIC granted PSUs contingent upon the achievement of certain total stockholder return (“TSR”) targets as compared to the TSR of a group of peer companies for the three-year measurement period, at which date the awards may vest.  We utilize a Monte Carlo simulation approach in a risk-neutral framework with inputs including historical volatility and the risk-free rate of interest to value these TSR awards.  We amortize the total estimated cost over the service period of the award.
 
In November 2013, February 2014, and February 2015,  the CIC granted PSUs contingent on the achievement of certain earnings per share (“EPS”) targets over the three-year measurement period.  At the end of each reporting period, we estimate the number of shares we believe will ultimately vest and record that expense over the service period of the award.
 
Comparative data for the PSUs include:
 
   
2015 Awards
   
2014 Awards
   
2013 Awards
 
TSR Awards
                 
Shares granted
    10,761       10,340       16,149  
Per-share fair value
  $ 142.55     $ 112.60     $ 139.51  
Volatility
    25.2 %     30.8 %     21.2 %
Risk-free interest rate
    0.93 %     0.33 %     0.25 %
                         
EPS Awards
                       
Shares granted
    10,761       14,061       16,149  
Per-share fair value
  $ 113.14     $ 82.80     $ 139.51  
                         
Common Assumptions
                       
Service period (years)
    2.9       2.9       2.2  
Three-year measurement period ends December 31,
    2017       2016       2015  
 
 
87

 
 
The following table summarizes total stock option, stock award and PSU activity during 2015:

   
Stock Options
   
Stock Awards
   
Performance Units (PSUs)
 
         
Weighted Average
   
Aggregate
         
Weighted
   
Number of
   
Weighted
 
               
Remaining
   
Intrinsic
         
Average
   
Nonvested
   
Average
 
   
Number of
   
Exercise
   
Contractual
   
Value
   
Number of
   
Grant-Date
   
Target
   
Grant-Date
 
   
Options
   
Price
   
Life (Years)
   
(thousands)
   
Awards
   
Price
   
Units
   
Price
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2014
    1,768,174     $ 73.14                   140,510     $ 67.71       56,699     $ 81.91  
Granted
    422,750       157.36                   36,987       121.75       21,522       127.85  
Exercised/Vested
    (611,786 )     62.03                   (80,011 )     68.36       -       -  
Canceled/ Forfeited
    (15,263 )     89.64                   (754 )     79.50       (1,845 )     98.56  
Outstanding at December 31, 2015
    1,563,875       100.09       6.3     $ 82,056       96,732       87.75       44,692       110.58  
                                                                 
Vested and expected to vest
                                                               
at December 31, 2015
    1,563,875       100.09       6.3       82,056       96,732       87.75       127,061     97.68  
Exercisable at December 31, 2015
    768,261       70.41       6.1       61,756    
n.a.
   
n.a.
   
n.a.
   
n.a.
 
* Amount includes 46,610 share units which vested and were converted to Capital Stock and distributed in the first quarter of 2016. The shares that vested in 2016 had a weighted average grant-date fair value of $71.69 per share and an estimated fair value of $139.51.
 
 
We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model.  We determine expected term, volatility, dividend yield and forfeiture rate based on our historical experience.  We believe that historical experience is the best indicator of these factors.

Comparative data for stock options, stock awards and PSUs include (in thousands, except per-share amounts):

   
Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Total compensation cost of stock-based compensation
                 
plans charged against income
  $ 14,737     $ 10,323     $ 10,868  
Total income tax benefit recognized in income for stock
                       
based compensation plans
    5,416       3,794       3,994  
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
    45,600       26,344       16,922  
Total intrinsic value of stock awards vested during the period
    12,065       4,564       4,298  
Per-share weighted averaged grant-date fair value of
                       
stock awards granted
    121.75       88.48       77.13  
 
The assumptions we used to value stock option grants are as follows:

   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
                   
Stock price on date of issuance
  $ 157.36     $ 106.59     $ 70.30  
Grant date fair value per share
  $ 29.46     $ 21.58     $ 14.79  
Number of options granted
    422,750       410,800       392,274  
Expected term (years)
    4.0       4.8       4.9  
Risk free rate of return
    1.57 %     1.59 %     1.39 %
Volatility
    22.20 %     22.60 %     24.90 %
Dividend yield
    0.6 %     0.8 %     1.1 %
Forfeiture rate
    -       -       -  
 
 
88

 
 
Other data for stock options, stock awards and PSUs for 2015 include (dollar amounts in thousands):

   
Stock
   
Stock
       
   
Options
   
Awards
   
PSUs
 
Total unrecognized compensation related to nonvested options, stock awards
                 
and PSUs at the end of year
  $ 18,421     $ 3,849     $ 3,515  
Weighted average period over which unrecognized compensation cost of
                       
nonvested options, stock awards and PSUs to be recognized (years)
    2.4       2.1       1.7  
Actual income tax benefit realized from options exercised or stock awards
                       
and PSUs vested
  $ 16,786     $ 3,667     $ 2,397  
Aggregate intrinsic value of stock options, stock awards and PSUs vested
                       
and expected to vest
  $ 82,056     $ 14,586     $ 19,160  

EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (“ESPP”)
The ESPP allows eligible participants to purchase our shares through payroll deductions at current market value.  We pay administrative and broker fees associated with the ESPP.  Shares purchased for the ESPP are purchased on the open market and credited directly to participants’ accounts.  In accordance with the FASB’s guidance, the ESPP is non-compensatory.
 
5.
Segments and Nature of the Business
Our segments include the VITAS segment and the Roto-Rooter segment.  Relative contributions of each segment to service revenues and sales were 72% and 28%, respectively, in 2015 and 73% and 27%, respectively, in 2014.  The vast majority of our service revenues and sales from continuing operations are generated from business within the United States.

The reportable segments have been defined along service lines, which is consistent with the way the businesses are managed. In determining reportable segments, the RRSC and RRC operating units of the Roto-Rooter segment have been aggregated on the basis of possessing similar operating and economic characteristics.  The characteristics of these operating segments and the basis for aggregation are reviewed annually.  Accordingly, the reportable segments are defined as follows:

●   
The VITAS segment provides hospice services for patients with terminal illnesses.  This type of care is aimed at making the terminally ill patient’s end of life as comfortable and pain-free as possible.  Hospice care is available to patients who have been initially certified or re-certified as terminally ill (i.e., a prognosis of six months or less) by their attending physician, if any, and the hospice physician.  VITAS offers all levels of hospice care in a given market, including routine home care, inpatient care and continuous care.  Over 90% of VITAS’ revenues are derived through the Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement programs.

●   
The Roto-Rooter segment provides repair and maintenance services to residential and commercial accounts using the Roto-Rooter registered service marks. Such services include plumbing, drain cleaning and water restoration. They are delivered through company-owned and operated territories, independent contractor-operated territories and franchised locations. This segment also manufactures and sells products and equipment used to provide such services.
 
●   
We report corporate administrative expenses and unallocated investing and financing income and expense not directly related to either segment as “Corporate”. Corporate administrative expense includes the stewardship, accounting and reporting, legal, tax and other costs of operating a publicly held corporation. Corporate investing and financing income and expenses include the costs and income associated with corporate debt and investment arrangements.
 
 
89

 
 
Segment data are set forth below (in thousands):
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Revenues by Type of Service
       
 
       
VITAS
                 
  Routine homecare
  $ 865,145     $ 810,413     $ 791,735  
  Continuous care
    150,802       152,206       155,409  
  General inpatient
    99,439       102,876       104,968  
  Medicare cap
    165       (1,290 )     (6,999 )
Total segment
    1,115,551       1,064,205       1,045,113  
Roto-Rooter
                       
  Sewer and drain cleaning
    142,562       141,078       141,283  
  Plumbing repair and maintenance
    188,065       174,993       168,942  
  Independent contractors
    37,966       36,496       33,030  
  Water restoration
    38,163       18,480       3,042  
  Other products and services
    21,081       21,030       21,919  
Total segment
    427,837       392,077       368,216  
Total service revenues and sales
  $ 1,543,388     $ 1,456,282     $ 1,413,329  
                         
Aftertax Segment Earnings/(Loss)
                       
VITAS
  $ 93,346     $ 86,185     $ 76,144  
Roto-Rooter
    48,573       42,075       29,243  
Total
    141,919       128,260       105,387  
Corporate
    (31,645 )     (28,943 )     (28,160 )
Net income
  $ 110,274     $ 99,317     $ 77,227  
                         
Interest Income
                       
VITAS
  $ 7,740     $ 6,111     $ 5,038  
Roto-Rooter
    3,425       2,931       2,096  
Total
    11,165       9,042       7,134  
Corporate
    -       10       56  
Intercompany eliminations
    (10,884 )     (9,081 )     (6,343 )
Total interest income
  $ 281     $ (29 )   $ 847  
                         
Interest Expense
                       
VITAS
  $ 200     $ 207     $ 182  
Roto-Rooter
    348       363       322  
Total
    548       570       504  
Corporate
    3,097       7,616       14,531  
Total interest expense
  $ 3,645     $ 8,186     $ 15,035  
                         
Income Tax Provision
                       
VITAS
  $ 56,675     $ 53,278     $ 46,910  
Roto-Rooter
    29,630       25,808       17,560  
Total
    86,305       79,086       64,470  
Corporate
    (16,453 )     (15,649 )     (17,868 )
Total income tax provision
  $ 69,852     $ 63,437     $ 46,602  
                         
Identifiable Assets
                       
VITAS
  $ 523,717     $ 546,031     $ 518,316  
Roto-Rooter
    255,192       251,407       241,679  
Total
    778,909       797,438       759,995  
Corporate
    73,416       62,494       133,706  
Total identifiable assets
  $ 852,325     $ 859,932     $ 893,701  
 
 
90

 
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Additions to Long-Lived Assets
                 
VITAS
  $ 23,278     $ 21,880     $ 16,219  
Roto-Rooter
    26,476       21,595       15,202  
Total
    49,754       43,475       31,421  
Corporate
    995       346       160  
Total additions to long-lived assets
  $ 50,749     $ 43,821     $ 31,581  
Depreciation and Amortization
                       
VITAS
  $ 19,547     $ 19,048     $ 19,534  
Roto-Rooter
    13,360       10,975       9,273  
Total
    32,907       30,023       28,807  
Corporate
    592       578       535  
Total depreciation and amortization
  $ 33,499     $ 30,601     $ 29,342  
 
6.
 Intangible Assets
Amortization of definite-lived intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013, was $1.1 million, $720,000 and $1.6 million, respectively.  The following is a schedule by year of projected amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets (in thousands):
 
2016
  $ 359  
2017
    169  
2018
    122  
2019
    96  
2020
    66  
Thereafter
    59  

The balance in identifiable intangible assets comprises the following (in thousands):
 
   
Gross
   
Accumulated
   
Net Book
 
   
Asset
   
Amortization
   
Value
 
December 31, 2015
                 
Referral networks
  $ 21,729     $ (21,473 )   $ 256  
Covenants not to compete
    9,533       (9,220 )     313  
Customer lists
    1,215       (1,215 )     -  
Reaquired franchise rights
    1,260       (958 )     302  
Subtotal - definite-lived intangibles
    33,737       (32,866 )     871  
VITAS trade name
    51,300       -       51,300  
Rapid Rooter trade name
    150       -       150  
Operating licenses
    2,790       -       2,790  
Total
  $ 87,977     $ (32,866 )   $ 55,111  
                         
December 31, 2014
                       
Referral networks
  $ 22,599     $ (21,626 )   $ 973  
Covenants not to compete
    9,575       (9,209 )     366  
Customer lists
    1,219       (1,194 )     25  
Reaquired franchise rights
    1,106       (743 )     363  
Subtotal - definite-lived intangibles
    34,499       (32,772 )     1,727  
VITAS trade name
    51,300       -       51,300  
Rapid Rooter trade name
    150       -       150  
Operating licenses
    2,850       -       2,850  
Total
  $ 88,799     $ (32,772 )   $ 56,027  

 
91

 
 
7.
Business Combinations
During 2015, we completed two business combinations of former franchisees within the Roto-Rooter segment for $6.6 million in cash to increase our market penetration in Pennsylvania and Nebraska.  The purchase price of these acquisitions was allocated as follows (in thousands):
 
Identifiable intangible assets
  $ 213  
Goodwill
    5,944  
Other assets and liabilities - net
    457  
    $ 6,614  
 
During 2014, we completed one business combination of a former franchisee within the Roto-Rooter segment for $250,000 in cash to increase our market penetration in Idaho.  The purchase price of this acquisition was allocated as follows (in thousands):
 
Identifiable intangible assets
  $ 47  
Goodwill
    198  
Other assets and liabilities - net
    5  
    $ 250  
 
During 2013, we completed one business combination of a former franchisee within the Roto-Rooter segment for $756,000 in cash to increase our market penetration in Colorado. We made one acquisition within the VITAS segment for $1.5 million in cash to increase our market penetration in Houston, Texas during 2013.  The purchase price of these acquisitions was allocated as follows (in thousands):
 
Identifiable intangible assets
  $ 1,023  
Goodwill
    1,212  
Other assets and liabilities - net
    22  
    $ 2,257  
 
The unaudited pro forma results of operations, assuming purchase business combinations completed in 2015 and 2014 were completed on January 1, 2014, do not materially impact the accompanying consolidated financial statements.  The results of operations of each of the above business combinations are included in our results of operations from the date of the respective acquisition.

 
 
 
 
8.
Discontinued Operations
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, the accrual for our estimated liability for potential environmental cleanup and related costs arising from the 1991 sale of DuBois amounted to $1.7 million.  Of the 2015 balance, $826,000 is included in other current liabilities and $901,000 is included in other liabilities (long-term).   The estimated amounts and timing of payments of these liabilities follows (in thousands):
 
2016
  $ 826  
2017
    300  
Thereafter
    601  
    $ 1,727  

We are contingently liable for additional DuBois-related environmental cleanup and related costs up to a maximum of $14.9 million.  On the basis of a continuing evaluation of the potential liability, we believe it is not probable this additional liability will be paid.  Accordingly, no provision for this contingent liability has been recorded.  The potential liability is not insured, and the recorded liability does not assume the recovery of insurance proceeds.  Also, the environmental liability has not been discounted because it is not possible to reliably project the timing of payments.  We believe that any adjustments to our recorded liability will not materially adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 
92

 
 
 
 
 
 
9.
Cash Overdrafts and Cash Equivalents
Included in accounts payable are cash overdrafts of $9.3 million and $10.5 million as of December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
 
From time to time throughout the year, we invest excess cash in money market funds directly with major commercial banks. We closely monitor the creditworthiness of the institutions with which we invest our overnight funds. We had $76,000 in cash equivalents as of December 31, 2015. There was $80,000 in cash equivalents as of December 31, 2014. The weighted average rate of return for our cash equivalents was 0.20% in 2015 and 0.06% in 2014.
 
 
 
 
 
10.
Other Income/(expense)—Net
 Other income/(expense)—net from continuing operations comprises the following (in thousands):

   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Market value gains related to deferred
                 
compensation trusts
  $ 148     $ 3,118     $ 4,982  
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    (698 )     (640 )     (320 )
Interest income/ (expense)
    281       (29 )     847  
Other - net
    (418 )     72       (39 )
Total other income/(expense)
  $ (687 )   $ 2,521     $ 5,470  

The offset for market value gains or losses of the deferred compensation trust are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.
 
 
 
 
 
11.
Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes comprises the following (in thousands):

   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Current
                 
U.S. federal
  $ 55,026     $ 48,577     $ 45,348  
U.S. state and local
    8,104       7,285       7,731  
Foreign
    397       597       511  
Deferred
                       
U.S. federal, state and local
    6,323       6,970       (6,995 )
Foreign
    2       8       7  
Total
  $ 69,852     $ 63,437     $ 46,602  

A summary of the temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets/ (liabilities) follows (in thousands):
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
 
Accrued liabilities
  $ 39,529     $ 37,879  
Stock compensation expense
    8,555       11,591  
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable
    1,729       2,779  
State net operating loss carryforwards
    1,701       1,603  
Other
    896       807  
Deferred income tax assets
    52,410       54,659  
Amortization of intangible assets
    (50,136 )     (47,946 )
Accelerated tax depreciation
    (18,030 )     (15,641 )
Currents assets
    (1,576 )     (1,519 )
State income taxes
    (1,465 )     (698 )
Market valuation of investments
    (1,375 )     (2,346 )
Other
    (857 )     (1,023 )
Deferred income tax liabilities
    (73,439 )     (69,173 )
Net deferred income tax liabilities
  $ (21,029 )   $ (14,514 )
 
 
93

 
 
At December 31, 2015 and 2014, state net operating loss carryforwards were $34.0 million and $31.8 million, respectively.  These net operating losses will expire, in varying amounts, between 2022 and 2035.  Based on our history of operating earnings, we have determined that our operating income will, more likely than not, be sufficient to ensure realization of our deferred income tax assets.
 
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending of year amount of our unrecognized tax benefit is as follows (in thousands):

   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Balance at January 1,
  $ 980     $ 892     $ 2,646  
Unrecognized tax benefits due to positions taken in current year
    260       247       219  
Decrease due to expiration of statute of limitations
    (188 )     (159 )     (1,973 )
Balance at December 31,
  $ 1,052     $ 980     $ 892  

We file tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states.  The years ended December 31, 2012 and forward remain open for review for federal income tax purposes.  The earliest open year relating to any of our major state jurisdictions is the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.  During the next twelve months, we do not anticipate a material net change in unrecognized tax benefits.

We classify interest related to our accrual for uncertain tax positions in separate interest accounts.  As of December 31, 2015 and 2014, we have approximately $125,000 and $123,000, respectively, accrued in interest payable related to uncertain tax positions.  These accruals are included in other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.  Net interest expense related to uncertain tax positions included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of income is not material.

The difference between the actual income tax provision for continuing operations and the income tax provision calculated at the statutory U.S. federal tax rate is explained as follows (in thousands):
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
                   
Income tax provision calculated using  the statutory rate of 35%
  $ 63,044     $ 56,964     $ 43,340  
State and local income taxes, less federal income tax effect
    5,787       5,536       4,323  
Uncertain tax position adjustments
    -       -       (1,782 )
Nondeductible expenses
    1,438       1,290       1,250  
Other --net
    (417 )     (353 )     (529 )
Income tax provision
  $ 69,852     $ 63,437     $ 46,602  
Effective tax rate
    38.8 %     39.0 %     37.6 %

Summarized below are the total amounts of income taxes paid during the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
 
2015
    $ 62,928  
2014
      44,921  
2013
      55,827  
 
Provision has not been made for additional taxes on $35.1 million of undistributed earnings of our domestic subsidiaries.  Should we elect to sell our interest in all of these businesses rather than to effect a tax-free liquidation, additional taxes amounting to approximately $12.9 million would be incurred based on current income tax rates.

 
94

 

 
 
 
 
12.
Properties and Equipment
A summary of properties and equipment follows (in thousands):
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
 
Land
  $ 5,365     $ 4,261  
Buildings and building improvements
    64,440       61,401  
Transportation equipment
    31,077       26,904  
Machinery and equipment
    83,293       77,273  
Computer software
    45,414       51,564  
Furniture and fixtures
    71,894       66,248  
Projects under development
    16,981       3,420  
Total properties and equipment
    318,464       291,071  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (201,094 )     (185,735 )
Net properties and equipment
  $ 117,370     $ 105,336  

The net book value of computer software at December 31, 2015 and 2014, was $8.3 million and $10.5 million, respectively.  Depreciation expense for computer software was $3.9 million, $ 4.4 million and $3.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

13.
Lease Arrangements
 
We have operating leases that cover our corporate office headquarters, various warehouse and office facilities, office equipment and transportation equipment. The remaining terms of these leases range from monthly to eleven years, and in most cases we expect that these leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases in the normal course of business. We have no significant capital leases as of December 31, 2015 or 2014.
 
The following is a summary of future minimum rental payments and sublease rentals to be received under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable terms in excess of one year at December 31, 2015 (in thousands):
 
2016
  $ 21,679  
2017
    15,815  
2018
    12,420  
2019
    8,697  
2020
    6,189  
Thereafter
    14,294  
Total minimum rental payments
  $ 79,094  

Total rental expense incurred under operating leases for continuing operations follows (in thousands):
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
                   
Total rental expense
  $ 40,021     $ 39,606     $ 38,992  
 
14.
Retirement Plans
Retirement obligations under various plans cover substantially all full-time employees who meet age and/or service eligibility requirements. All plans providing retirement benefits to our employees are defined contribution plans.  Expenses for our retirement and profit-sharing plans, excess benefit plans and other similar plans are as follows (in thousands):

For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
               
$ 11,970     $ 13,838     $ 14,511  
 
These expenses include the impact of market gains and losses on assets held in deferred compensation plans.
 
 
95

 
 
We have excess benefit plans for key employees whose participation in the qualified plans is limited by U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act requirements. Benefits are determined based on theoretical participation in the qualified plans.  Benefits are only invested in mutual funds, and participants are not permitted to diversify accumulated benefits in shares of our capital stock. Trust assets invested in shares of our stock are included in treasury stock, and the corresponding liability is included in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2015, these trusts held 99,309 shares at historical average cost or $2.4 million of our stock (2014 – 99,231 shares or $2.3 million).

15.
Earnings Per Share
The computation of earnings per share follows (in thousands, except per share data):
 
   
Net Income
 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
Net Income
   
Shares
     
Earnings per
Share
 
2015
                     
Earnings
 
$
 110,274 
   
 16,870 
   
6.54 
 
Dilutive stock options
   
 -
   
 394 
         
Nonvested stock awards
   
 -
   
 158 
         
Diluted earnings
 
$
 110,274 
   
 17,422 
   
6.33 
 
                       
2014
                     
Earnings
 
$
 99,317 
   
 17,165 
   
5.79 
 
Dilutive stock options
   
 -
   
 412 
         
Nonvested stock awards
   
 -
   
 149 
         
Conversion of Notes and impact of warrants outstanding
   
 -
   
 114 
         
Diluted earnings
 
$
 99,317 
   
 17,840 
   
5.57 
 
                       
2013                      
Earnings
 
$
 77,227 
   
 18,199 
   
4.24 
 
Dilutive stock options
   
 -
   
 278 
         
Nonvested stock awards
   
 -
   
 108 
         
Diluted earnings
 
$
 77,227 
   
 18,585 
   
4.16 
 
 
During 2015, 422,000 stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their exercise prices were greater than the average market price during most of the year.  During 2014, 411,000 stock options were also excluded.  During 2013, 358,000 stock options were also excluded.
 
In 2014, diluted earnings per share was impacted by the issuance of 249,000 shares of capital stock under the conversion feature of our 1.875% Senior Convertible Notes (the “Notes”) on May 15, 2014.  The dilutive impact of this conversion feature for 2014 was 102,000 shares.
 
At the time we issued the Notes, as discussed in Note 3, we also sold warrants for the right to purchase approximately 2,477,000 Chemed shares in the future.  During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, we settled these warrants with one counterparty representing half of the total warrants issued for $2.6 million.  The amount paid was recorded as an adjustment to paid-in capital.   During the third quarter of 2014, Chemed’s stock price exceeded the exercise price of the remaining outstanding sold warrants resulting in the Company, on December 8, 2014, issuing 35,166 of Capital shares to the other counterparty in full settlement of the warrants.  Pursuant to authoritative guidance, the settlement of the sold warrants were accounted for as an equity transactions.    The dilutive impact of the warrants was 12,000 shares for the year ended December 31, 2014.
 
16.
Financial Instruments
FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements defines a hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs in fair value measurements.  Level 1 measurements are measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2 measurements use significant other observable inputs.  Level 3 measurements are measurements using significant unobservable inputs which require a company to develop its own assumptions.  In recording the fair value of assets and liabilities, companies must use the most reliable measurement available.
 
 
96

 
 
The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

         
Fair Value Measure
 
   
Carrying Value
   
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
   
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
   
Significant Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
                         
Investments of deferred compensation plans held in trust
  $ 49,481     $ 49,481     $ -     $ -  
Long-term debt and current portion of long-term debt
    91,250       -       91,250       -  

The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of December 31, 2014 (in thousands):

         
Fair Value Measure
 
   
Carrying Value
   
Quoted Prices in Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
   
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
   
Significant Unobservabl
 Inputs (Level 3)
 
                         
Investments of deferred compensation plans held in trust
  $ 49,147     $ 49,147     $ -     $ -  
Long-term debt
    147,500       -       147,500       -  
 
For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the liquidity and short-term nature of these instruments.

 
17.
Loans Receivable from Independent Contractors
At December 31, 2015, we had contractual arrangements with 69 independent contractors to provide plumbing repair, drain cleaning and water restoration services under sublicensing agreements using the Roto-Rooter name in lesser-populated areas of the United States and Canada. The arrangements give the independent contractors the right to conduct a plumbing, drain cleaning and water restoration business using the Roto-Rooter name in a specified territory in exchange for a royalty based on a percentage of labor sales, depending upon type of service this percentage ranges between 27%–32%.  We also pay for certain telephone directory advertising and internet marketing in these areas,  lease certain capital equipment and provide operating manuals to serve as resources for operating a plumbing, drain cleaning and water restoration business.  The contracts are generally cancelable upon 90 days’ written notice (without cause) or upon a few days notice (with cause).  The independent contractors are responsible for running the businesses as they believe best.
 
Our maximum exposure to loss from arrangements with our independent contractors at December 31, 2015, is approximately $1.8 million (2014 - $1.6 million).  The exposure to loss is mainly the result of loans provided to the independent contractors.  In most cases, these loans are partially secured by receivables and equipment owned by the independent contractor.  The interest rates on the loans range from zero to 7% per annum, and the remaining terms of the loans range from 2.5 months to 5.4 years at December 31, 2015.  We recorded the following from our independent contractors (in thousands):

   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
                   
Revenues
  $ 37,966     $ 36,496     $ 33,030  
Pretax profits
    22,176       21,238       17,726  
 
18.
Legal and Regulatory Matters
The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry.  As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions.  The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware.  It is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or estimable.

 
97

 
 
Regulatory Matters and Litigation

On May 2, 2013, the government filed a False Claims Act complaint against the Company and certain of its hospice-related subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al., No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”).  Prior to that date, the Company received various qui tam lawsuits and subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed.  The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002, VITAS, and since 2004, the Company, submitted or caused the submission of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course.  This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costs of the action, plus interest.  The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.  On September 30, 2014, the Court denied the motion, except to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002. On November 13, 2014, the government filed a Second Amended Complaint.  The Second Amended Complaint changed and supplemented some of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of action or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS.  VITAS filed its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint on August 11, 2015.  The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss at this time.

For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings. The net costs incurred related to U.S. v. Vitas and related regulatory matters were $5.0 million, $2.1 million and $2.1 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively.

In November 2013, two shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against the Company’s current and former directors, as well as certain of its officers, both of which are covered by the Company’s commercial insurance.  On November 6, 2013, KBC Asset Management NV filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, KBC Asset Management NV, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. McNamara, et al., No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (D. Del.).  It sued Kevin McNamara, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Thomas Hutton, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, Arthur Tucker, Jr., George Walsh III, Frank Wood, Timothy O’Toole, David Williams and Ernest Mrozek, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that since at least 2004, Chemed, through VITAS, has submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare.  The suit alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants, and seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.

On November 14, 2013, Mildred A. North filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, North, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. Kevin McNamara, et al., No. 13 Civ. 833 (MDB) (S.D. Ohio).  She sued Kevin McNamara, David Williams, Timothy O’Toole, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, George Walsh III, Frank Wood and Thomas Hutton, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that, between February 2010 and the present, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties as officers and directors of Chemed by, among other things, (a) allegedly causing VITAS to submit improper and ineligible claims to Medicare and Medicaid; and (b) allegedly misrepresenting the state of Chemed’s internal controls.  The suit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control and gross mismanagement against the individual defendants.  The complaint also alleges unjust enrichment and insider trading against Messrs. McNamara, Williams and O’Toole.  Plaintiff seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.

On January 29, 2014 defendants in North filed a motion to transfer that case to Delaware under 28 U.S.C § 1404(a). On February 12, 2014, defendants in KBC filed a motion to dismiss that case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1 and 12(b)(6).  On September 19, 2014, the Ohio court granted defendants’ motion to transfer North to Delaware.  Following that decision and in light of that transfer, on September 29, 2014, the Delaware court denied without prejudice defendants’ motion to dismiss KBC, and referred both cases to Magistrate Judge Burke.

 
98

 
 
On October 15, 2014, Plaintiff KBC filed a motion to consolidate KBC with North.  On February 2, 2015 the court granted the motion for consolidation in full, appointing Plaintiff KBC the sole lead plaintiff and its counsel, the sole lead and liaison counsel.  The court ordered that both cases will proceed under the caption In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder and Derivative Litigation, No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.).  Plaintiff KBC has designated its pending complaint as the operative complaint in the consolidated proceedings.  Defendants subsequently renewed their motion to dismiss those claims and allegations.  On December 23, 2015, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a Report & Recommendation recommending that (1) defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted; (2) plaintiff be given 14 days from the date of affirmance by the district court to file an amended complaint addressing deficiencies with regard to their duty of loyalty claim; and (3) failure to do so should give rise to dismissal with prejudice.  The Report and Recommendation remains subject to review and affirmance by the district court judge overseeing the matter.  On January 11, 2016, Lead Plaintiff KBC filed Objections to the Report and Recommendations.  Defendants responses to those Objections were filed on January 28, 2016.

The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits.  Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, responding to the subpoenas and dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity.  Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
 
 
19.
Concentration of Risk
VITAS has pharmacy services agreements (“Agreements”) with Enclara Pharmacia (previously Hospice Pharmacia) whereby Enclara provides specified pharmacy services for VITAS and its hospice patients in geographical areas served by both VITAS and Enclara.  VITAS made purchases from Enclara of $37.7 million, $35.6 million and $39.0 million for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, respectively, purchases from this vendor represent approximately 90% of all pharmacy services used by VITAS.  VITAS’ accounts payable to Enclara was $3.0 million at December 31, 2015.  At December 31, 2014, VITAS’ accounts payable to Enclara was $3.6 million..

 
20.
Capital Stock Transactions
In March 2015, our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million for stock repurchase under the February 2011 repurchase program. We repurchased the following capital stock:
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Total cost of repurchased shares (in thousands):
  $ 59,323     $ 110,019     $ 92,911  
Shares repurchased
    460,765       1,182,934       1,356,344  
Weighted average price per share
  $ 128.75     $ 93.01     $ 68.50  
 
 
21.
Other Operating Expenses (in thousands):
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2013
 
Litigation settlement of VITAS segment
  $ 10,500  
Settlements of Roto-Rooter segment
    15,721  
Total other operating expenses
  $ 26,221  

 
22.
Recent Accounting Statements
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU No. 2014-09 – Revenue from Contracts with Customers” which provides additional guidance to clarify the principles for recognizing revenue.  The standard will also be used to develop a common revenue standard for removing inconsistencies and weaknesses, improve comparability, provide more useful information to users through improved disclosure requirements, and simplify the preparation of financial statements.  The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017.  We are currently evaluating the impact of this ASU on our existing revenue recognition policies and disclosures.

 
99

 
 
In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-15, “ASU No. 2014-15 - Presentation of Financial Statements-Going Concern”.   ASU 2014-15 is intended to define management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an organization's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. This guidance is effective for us for the annual period ending December 31, 2016 and interim periods thereafter. We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-03, “ASU No. 2015-03 – Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs”.  ASU 2015-03 is intended to simplify the presentation of debt issuance costs.  Under the new guidance, debt issuance costs will be presented as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt, consistent with the existing presentation of a debt discount.  This guidance is effective for us for the annual period beginning after December 15, 2015.  We do not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

In August 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2015-15, “ASU No. 2015-15- Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line of Credit Arrangements”.  This Accounting Standards Update adds SEC paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Accouncement at the June 18, 2015 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting.  Given the absence of authoritative guidance within Update 2015-03 for debt issuance costs related to line-of-credit arrangements, the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance ratably over the term of the line-of-credit arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement.  We do not expect this interpretation to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash flows.


 
100

 
 
UNAUDITED SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
 
                               
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                             
(in thousands, except per share and footnote data)
                             
                               
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2015
 
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Total service revenues and sales
  $ 376,652     $ 381,921     $ 386,226     $ 398,589     $ 1,543,388  
Gross profit (excluding depreciation)
  $ 107,767     $ 111,258     $ 114,137     $ 122,616     $ 455,778  
Income from operations
  $ 40,571     $ 44,600     $ 50,128     $ 49,159     $ 184,458  
Interest expense
    (969 )     (969 )     (908 )     (799 )     (3,645 )
Other income/(expense)--net
    563       536       (2,355 )     569       (687 )
Income before income taxes
    40,165       44,167       46,865       48,929       180,126  
Income taxes
    (15,628 )     (17,192 )     (18,032 )     (19,000 )     (69,852 )
Net income (a)
  $ 24,537     $ 26,975     $ 28,833     $ 29,929     $ 110,274  
                                         
Earnings Per Share (a)
                                       
Net income
  $ 1.45     $ 1.60     $ 1.71     $ 1.78     $ 6.54  
Average number of shares outstanding
    16,914       16,880       16,865       16,819       16,870  
                                         
Diluted Earnings Per Share (a)
                                       
Net income
  $ 1.40     $ 1.55     $ 1.65     $ 1.72     $ 6.33  
Average number of shares outstanding
    17,466       17,419       17,422       17,365       17,422  
                                         
                                         
(a) The following amounts are included in income during the respective quarter (in thousands):
 
                                         
                                         
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Pretax (cost)/benefit:
                           
Stock option expense
  $ (1,444 )   $ (1,343 )   $ (813 )   $ (1,845 )   $ (5,445 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    (934 )     (1,457 )     (1,364 )     (3,764 )     (7,519 )
Acquisition expenses
    -       (131 )     (30 )     (11 )     (172 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (5 )     -       -       -       (5 )
Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       (37 )     -       -       (37 )
Expenses related to the Office
                                       
of Inspector General investigation
    (1,274 )     (1,412 )     (1,151 )     (1,137 )     (4,974 )
Total
  $ (3,657 )   $ (4,380 )   $ (3,358 )   $ (6,757 )   $ (18,152 )
After-tax (cost)/benefit:
                                       
Stock option expense
  $ (910 )   $ (849 )   $ (509 )   $ (1,171 )   $ (3,439 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    (591 )     (921 )     (863 )     (2,377 )     (4,752 )
Acquisition expenses
    -       (80 )     (18 )     (6 )     (104 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (3 )     -       -       -       (3 )
Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       (23 )     -       -       (23 )
Expenses related to the Office
                                       
of Inspector General investigation
    (790 )     (868 )     (711 )     (703 )     (3,072 )
Total
  $ (2,294 )   $ (2,741 )   $ (2,101 )   $ (4,257 )   $ (11,393 )
 
 
101

 
 
UNAUDITED SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
 
                               
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                             
(in thousands, except per share and footnote data)
                             
                               
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
 
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Total service revenues and sales
  $ 358,300     $ 360,182     $ 358,389     $ 379,411     $ 1,456,282  
Gross profit (excluding depreciation)
  $ 100,481     $ 103,175     $ 101,944     $ 116,009     $ 421,609  
Income from operations
  $ 36,652     $ 41,519     $ 40,211     $ 50,037     $ 168,419  
Interest expense
    (3,815 )     (2,429 )     (980 )     (962 )     (8,186 )
Other income/(expense)--net
    816       756       705       244       2,521  
Income before income taxes
    33,653       39,846       39,936       49,319       162,754  
Income taxes
    (13,079 )     (15,483 )     (15,351 )     (19,524 )     (63,437 )
Net income (a)
  $ 20,574     $ 24,363     $ 24,585     $ 29,795     $ 99,317  
                                         
Earnings Per Share (a)
                                       
Net income
  $ 1.17     $ 1.41     $ 1.44     $ 1.77     $ 5.79  
Average number of shares outstanding
    17,510       17,236       17,039       16,878       17,165  
                                         
Diluted Earnings Per Share (a)
                                       
Net income
  $ 1.12     $ 1.36     $ 1.39     $ 1.71     $ 5.57  
Average number of shares outstanding
    18,305       17,880       17,627       17,469       17,840  
                                         
(a) The following amounts are included in income during the respective quarter (in thousands):
 
                                         
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Pretax (cost)/benefit:
                           
Stock option expense
  $ (1,309 )   $ (1,144 )   $ (977 )   $ (1,372 )   $ (4,802 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    (2,259 )     (1,130 )     -       -       (3,389 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    (373 )     (613 )     (1,002 )     (581 )     (2,569 )
Acquisition expenses
    (1 )     -       -       (23 )     (24 )
Recoveries/(expenses) related to litigation settlements
    (306 )     (32 )     234       (16 )     (120 )
Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       (189 )     (138 )     -       (327 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office
                                       
of Inspector General investigation
    (748 )     (410 )     (450 )     (533 )     (2,141 )
Total
  $ (4,996 )   $ (3,518 )   $ (2,333 )   $ (2,525 )   $ (13,372 )
After-tax (cost)/benefit:
                                       
Stock option expense
  $ (822 )   $ (722 )   $ (615 )   $ (863 )   $ (3,022 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    (1,429 )     (714 )     -       -       (2,143 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    (236 )     (388 )     (634 )     (367 )     (1,625 )
Acquisition expenses
    (1 )     -       -       (14 )     (15 )
Recoveries/(expenses) related to litigation settlements
    (187 )     (20 )     143       (10 )     (74 )
Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       (119 )     (88 )     -       (207 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office
                                       
of Inspector General investigation
    (464 )     (254 )     (279 )     (331 )     (1,328 )
Total
  $ (3,139 )   $ (2,217 )   $ (1,473 )   $ (1,585 )   $ (8,414 )

 
102

 

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
     
                               
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                             
(in thousands, except per share and footnote data, ratios, percentages and personnel)
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Summary of Operations
                             
   Continuing operations (a)
                             
      Service revenues and sales
  $ 1,543,388     $ 1,456,282     $ 1,413,329     $ 1,430,043     $ 1,355,970  
      Gross profit (excluding depreciation)
    455,778       421,609       404,521       396,722       385,486  
      Depreciation
    32,369       29,881       27,698       26,009       25,247  
      Amortization
    1,130       720       1,644       1,508       1,467  
      Income  from operations
    184,458       168,419       133,394       156,419       153,727  
      Net income (b)
    110,274       99,317       77,227       89,304       85,979  
   Earnings per share
                                       
      Net income
  $ 6.54     $ 5.79     $ 4.24     $ 4.72     $ 4.19  
      Average number of shares outstanding
    16,870       17,165       18,199       18,924       20,523  
   Diluted earnings per share
                                       
      Net income
  $ 6.33     $ 5.57     $ 4.16     $ 4.62     $ 4.10  
      Average number of shares outstanding
    17,422       17,840       18,585       19,339       20,945  
   Cash dividends per share
  $ 0.92     $ 0.84     $ 0.76     $ 0.68     $ 0.60  
Financial Position--Year-End
                                       
   Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 14,727     $ 14,132     $ 84,418     $ 69,531     $ 38,081  
   Working capital/(deficit)
    (20,528 )     (990 )     (139,330 )     40,849       5,353  
   Current ratio
    0.88       0.99       0.62       1.26       1.04  
   Properties and equipment, at cost less
                                       
      accumulated depreciation
  $ 117,370     $ 105,336     $ 92,955     $ 91,934     $ 82,951  
   Total assets
    852,325       859,932       893,701       859,626       795,905  
   Long-term debt
    83,750       141,250       -       174,890       166,784  
   Stockholders' equity
    513,253       451,356       448,890       453,291       413,684  
Other Statistics
                                       
   Capital expenditures
  $ 44,135     $ 43,571     $ 29,324     $ 35,252     $ 29,592  
   Number of employees
    14,406       14,190       13,952       14,096       13,733  
                                         
(a) The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations during the respective year (in thousands):
 
                                         
      2015       2014       2013       2012       2011  
After-tax benefit/(cost):
                                       
Stock option expense
  $ (3,439 )   $ (3,022 )   $ (3,813 )   $ (5,143 )   $ (5,298 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    -       (2,143 )     (5,448 )     (5,041 )     (4,664 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    (4,752 )     (1,625 )     (822 )     (228 )     (1,880 )
Litigation settlements
    (3 )     (74 )     (16,061 )     -       -  
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    -       -       (865 )     (617 )     (1,397 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                                       
General investigation
    (3,072 )     (1,328 )     (1,333 )     (752 )     (737 )
Acquisition expense
    (104 )     (15 )     (38 )     (114 )     (75 )
Cost to shut down HVAC operations
    -       -       -       (649 )     -  
Expenses of securities litigation
    (23 )     (207 )     (69 )     (469 )     -  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    -       -       (294 )     -       -  
Severance arrangements
    -       -       (184 )     -       -  
Uncertain tax position adjustments
    -       -       1,782       -       -  
Total
  $ (11,393 )   $ (8,414 )   $ (27,145 )   $ (13,013 )   $ (14,051 )
 
 
103

 
 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2015
 
(in thousands)(unaudited)
 
       
Roto-
       
Chemed
 
   
VITAS
   
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
2015
                       
Service revenues and sales
  $ 1,115,551     $ 427,837     $ -     $ 1,543,388  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    862,587       225,023       -       1,087,610  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    89,879       114,269       33,673       237,821  
Depreciation
    18,789       12,988       592       32,369  
Amortization
    758       372       -       1,130  
Total costs and expenses
    972,013       352,652       34,265       1,358,930  
Income/(loss) from operations
    143,538       75,185       (34,265 )     184,458  
Interest expense
    (200 )     (348 )     (3,097 )     (3,645 )
Intercompany interest income/(expense)
    7,499       3,385       (10,884 )     -  
Other income/(expense)—net
    (816 )     (19 )     148       (687 )
Income/(loss) before income taxes
    150,021       78,203       (48,098 )     180,126  
Income taxes
    (56,675 )     (29,630 )     16,453       (69,852 )
Net income/(loss)
  $ 93,346     $ 48,573     $ (31,645 )   $ 110,274  
                                 
                                 
(a) The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations (in thousands):
 
           
Roto-
       
Chemed
 
    VITAS    
Rooter
    Corporate    
Consolidated
 
Pretax benefit/(cost):
                               
Stock option expense
  $ -     $ -     $ (5,445 )   $ (5,445 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       (7,519 )     (7,519 )
Securities litigation
    -       -       (37 )     (37 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    -       (5 )     -       (5 )
Acquisition expense
    -       (172 )     -       (172 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                               
General investigation
    (4,974 )     -       -       (4,974 )
Total
  $ (4,974 )   $ (177 )   $ (13,001 )   $ (18,152 )
                                 
           
Roto-
           
Chemed
 
   
VITAS
   
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
After-tax benefit/(cost):
                               
Stock option expense
  $ -     $ -     $ (3,439 )   $ (3,439 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       (4,752 )     (4,752 )
Securities litigation
    -       -       (23 )     (23 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    -       (3 )     -       (3 )
Acquisition expense
    -       (104 )     -       (104 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                               
General investigation
    (3,072 )     -       -       (3,072 )
Total
  $ (3,072 )   $ (107 )   $ (8,214 )   $ (11,393 )

 
104

 
 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2014
 
(in thousands)(unaudited)
 
                   
       
Roto-
       
Chemed
 
   
VITAS
   
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
2014
                       
Service revenues and sales
  $ 1,064,205     $ 392,077     $ -     $ 1,456,282  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    825,739       208,934       -       1,034,673  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    85,184       106,960       30,445       222,589  
Depreciation
    18,601       10,702       578       29,881  
Amortization
    447       273       -       720  
Total costs and expenses
    929,971       326,869       31,023       1,287,863  
Income/(loss) from operations
    134,234       65,208       (31,023 )     168,419  
Interest expense
    (207 )     (363 )     (7,616 )     (8,186 )
Intercompany interest income/(expense)
    6,189       2,892       (9,081 )     -  
Other income/(expense)—net
    (753 )     146       3,128       2,521  
Income/(loss) before income taxes
    139,463       67,883       (44,592 )     162,754  
Income taxes
    (53,278 )     (25,808 )     15,649       (63,437 )
Net income/(loss)
  $ 86,185     $ 42,075     $ (28,943 )   $ 99,317  
                                 
                                 
(a) The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations (in thousands):
 
           
Roto-
           
Chemed
 
    VITAS    
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
Pretax benefit/(cost):
                               
Stock option expense
  $ -     $ -     $ (4,802 )   $ (4,802 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    -       -       (3,389 )     (3,389 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       (2,569 )     (2,569 )
Securities litigation
    -       -       (327 )     (327 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (113 )     (7 )     -       (120 )
Acquisition expense
    (1 )     (23 )     -       (24 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                               
General investigation
    (2,141 )     -       -       (2,141 )
Total
  $ (2,255 )   $ (30 )   $ (11,087 )   $ (13,372 )
                                 
           
Roto-
           
Chemed
 
   
VITAS
   
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
After-tax benefit/(cost):
                               
Stock option expense
  $ -     $ -     $ (3,022 )   $ (3,022 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    -       -       (2,143 )     (2,143 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       (1,625 )     (1,625 )
Securities litigation
    -       -       (207 )     (207 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (70 )     (4 )     -       (74 )
Acquisition expense
    (1 )     (14 )     -       (15 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                               
General investigation
    (1,328 )     -       -       (1,328 )
Total
  $ (1,399 )   $ (18 )   $ (6,997 )   $ (8,414 )

 
105

 
 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
 
(in thousands)(unaudited)
 
                   
       
Roto-
       
Chemed
 
   
VITAS
   
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
2013
                       
Service revenues and sales
  $ 1,045,113     $ 368,216     $ -     $ 1,413,329  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    813,600       195,208       -       1,008,808  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    82,969       102,940       29,655       215,564  
Depreciation
    18,149       9,014       535       27,698  
Amortization
    1,385       259       -       1,644  
Other operating expenses
    10,500       15,721       -       26,221  
Total costs and expenses
    926,603       323,142       30,190       1,279,935  
Income/(loss) from operations
    118,510       45,074       (30,190 )     133,394  
Interest expense
    (182 )     (322 )     (14,531 )     (15,035 )
Intercompany interest income/(expense)
    4,288       2,055       (6,343 )     -  
Other income/(expense)—net
    438       (4 )     5,036       5,470  
Income/(loss) before income taxes
    123,054       46,803       (46,028 )     123,829  
Income taxes
    (46,910 )     (17,560 )     17,868       (46,602 )
Net income/(loss)
  $ 76,144     $ 29,243     $ (28,160 )   $ 77,227  
                                 
                                 
(a) The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations (in thousands):
 
           
Roto-
           
Chemed
 
   
VITAS
   
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
Pretax benefit/(cost):
                               
Stock option expense
  $ -     $ -     $ (6,042 )   $ (6,042 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    -       -       (8,613 )     (8,613 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       (1,301 )     (1,301 )
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    -       -       (465 )     (465 )
Securities litigation
    -       -       (109 )     (109 )
Litigation settlement costs
    (10,500 )     (15,721 )     -       (26,221 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    -       (1,425 )     -       (1,425 )
Severance arrangements
    -       (302 )     -       (302 )
Acquisition expense
    (58 )     (4 )     -       (62 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                               
General investigation
    (2,149 )     -       -       (2,149 )
Total
  $ (12,707 )   $ (17,452 )   $ (16,530 )   $ (46,689 )
                                 
           
Roto-
            Chemed  
    VITAS    
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
After-tax benefit/(cost):
                               
Stock option expense
  $ -     $ -     $ (3,813 )   $ (3,813 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    -       -       (5,448 )     (5,448 )
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       (822 )     (822 )
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    -       -       (294 )     (294 )
Securities litigation
    -       -       (69 )     (69 )
Litigation settlement costs
    (6,510 )     (9,551 )     -       (16,061 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    -       (865 )     -       (865 )
Severance arrangements
    -       (184 )     -       (184 )
Acquisition expense
    (36 )     (2 )     -       (38 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                               
General investigation
    (1,333 )     -       -       (1,333 )
Uncertain tax position adjustments
    -       -       1,782       1,782  
Total
  $ (7,879 )   $ (10,602 )   $ (8,664 )   $ (27,145 )
 
 
106

 
 
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We operate through our two wholly owned subsidiaries: VITAS Healthcare Corporation (“VITAS”) and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. (“Roto-Rooter”). VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps make terminally ill patients' final days as comfortable as possible. Through its team of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their families. Roto-Rooter is focused on providing plumbing, drain cleaning, water restoration and other related services to both residential and commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to approximately 90% of the U.S. population.

The following is a summary of the key operating results for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013 (in thousands except percentages and per share amounts):
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Consolidated service revenues and sales
  $ 1,543,388     $ 1,456,282     $ 1,413,329  
Consolidated net income
  $ 110,274     $ 99,317     $ 77,227  
Diluted EPS
  $ 6.33     $ 5.57     $ 4.16  
Adjusted net income
  $ 121,667     $ 107,731     $ 104,372  
Adjusted diluted EPS
  $ 6.98     $ 6.07     $ 5.62  
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 235,931     $ 212,562     $ 206,850  
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of revenue
    15.3 %     14.6 %     14.6 %

Adjusted net income, adjusted diluted EPS, earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures derived in accordance with GAAP.  We use Adjusted EPS as a measure of earnings for certain long-term incentive awards.  We also use adjusted EBITDA to determine compliance with certain debt covenants.  We provide non-GAAP measures to help readers evaluate our operating results, compare our operating performance with that of similar companies that have different capital structures and help evaluate our ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditure and working capital requirements.  Our non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable measures presented in accordance with GAAP.  Reconciliations of our non-GAAP measures are presented in tables following the Critical Accounting Policies section.

2015 versus 2014
The increase in consolidated service revenues and sales from 2014 to 2015 was a result of a 9.1% increase at Roto-Rooter and a 4.8% increase at VITAS.    The increase at Roto-Rooter was driven by increased market penetration of water restoration services.  Roto-Rooter revenue increased 5.0% as a result of this market penetration.  The remaining increase was mainly a result of revenue increases in our plumbing line of business. .  The increase in service revenues at VITAS was a result of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing approximately 1.4%, a 5.5% increase in days of care offset by  level of care and geographical mix shift. Consolidated net income increased 11.0% over prior year mainly as a result of increased revenue at VITAS and Roto-Rooter combined with leveraging our current infrastructure resulting in operating costs growing at a slower rate than revenue.  Diluted EPS increased mainly as a result of the increase in earnings and by a decrease in the number of shares outstanding.  Adjusted EBITDA increased as a percent of revenue increased by 0.7%.

2014 versus 2013
The increase in consolidated service revenues and sales from 2013 to 2014 was a result of a 6.5% increase at Roto-Rooter and a 1.8% increase at VITAS.    The increase at Roto-Rooter was driven by increased market penetration of water restoration services.  Roto-Rooter revenue increased 3.9% as a result of this market penetration.  The remaining increase was mainly a result of revenue increases in our plumbing line of business.  The increase in service revenues at VITAS was a result of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing approximately 1.4%, offset by a 2.0% decline due to sequestration (which was effective May 1, 2013), an average daily census (“ADC”) increase of 1.4%, a $1.3 million net Medicare cap charge (compared to a $7.0 million charge in the same period of 2013) and level of care and geographical mix shift. Consolidated net income increased 28.6% over prior year mainly as a result of increased revenue at VITAS and Roto-Rooter as well as $16.1 million (after tax) in litigation settlements in 2013 that did not repeat in 2014.  Diluted EPS increased mainly as a result of the increase in earnings and by a decrease in the number of shares outstanding.  Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of revenue was essentially flat when compared to 2013.
 
 
107

 
 
Roto-Rooter utilizes a universal calendar of four 13 week quarters equating to a 52 week full year reporting period and then accrues for an additional one or two days of operating results in the fourth quarter to equate to a full 365 or 366 day year.  In the fourth quarter of 2014, Roto-Rooter had 14 weeks of operating activity during the quarter.  This additional week of operating activity, net of the accrued operating results from earlier years, resulted in Roto-Rooter recognizing an incremental $2.8 million of revenue, $0.9 million of Adjusted EBITDA and $0.5 million of net income in the fourth quarter of 2014 when compared to the fourth quarter of 2013.

Impact of Current Market Conditions
On January 1, 2016, CMS implemented a revenue neutral rebasing to the Medicare hospice reimbursement per diem.  This rebasing eliminated the single tier per diem for routine home care (RHC) and replaced it with a two-tiered rate, with a higher rate for the first 60 days of a hospice patient’s care, and a lower rate for days 61 and after. In addition, CMS provided for a Service Intensity Add-on (SIA) payment which provides for reimbursement of care provided by a registered nurse or social worker for RHC patients within seven days prior to death. The reimbursement for continuous care, inpatient care and respite care are not impacted by this rebasing.

The two tiered national per diem rate for RHC is $186.84 for the first 60 days and $146.83 for RHC provided to patients in hospice beyond 60 days.  An individual hospice’s actual per diem rate is adjusted for differences in geographic cost of living.  Rebasing in 2016 would be revenue neutral to a hospice if it has 37.6% of total RHC days-of-care being provided to patients in their first 60 days of admission and 62.4% of total RHC days-of-care provided to patients after the 60 days. (Days-of-Care ratio).

Historically, VITAS had a 32/68 aggregate Days-of-Care ratio. High acuity care historically has represented 6% to 7% of VITAS’ total days-of-care.  VITAS high acuity days-of-care provided to patients within the first 60 days of admission represented approximately 15% of days-of-care provided to patients in the first 60 days of admission.  This results in a VITAS RHC Days-of-Care ratio of approximately 29/71.

The impact to VITAS for the 2016 rebasing is estimated to reduce aggregate 2016 revenue by $16 million when compared to the single tier reimbursement model.  Rebasing is estimated to reduce 2016 RHC revenue by approximately $20 million partially offset by $4 million in SIA payments.

The estimated impact from rebasing is similar to the impact of sequestration.  It will have a one year impact relative to revenue and profitability growth when compared to the prior year.  However, similar to sequestration, VITAS anticipates a significant portion of this $16 million reduction in revenue will be offset by increased efficiencies in 2016 and 2017 in the areas of non bedside field operations and general administration.

Including the impact of rebasing, full-year 2016 revenue growth for VITAS, prior to Medicare Cap, is estimated to be in the range of 2.5% to 3.5%. Admissions in 2016 are estimated to increase 3% and full-year Adjusted EBITDA margin, prior to Medicare Cap, is estimated to be 14% to 15%.  This guidance includes $5.0 million for Medicare Cap billing limitations

Roto-Rooter is forecasted to achieve full-year 2016 revenue growth of 3.5% to 4.5%.  This revenue estimate is based upon increased job pricing of approximately 1.0% and continued growth in water restoration.  Adjusted EBITDA margin for 2016 is estimated in the range of 20.0% to 21.0%.
 
Based upon the above, full-year 2016 adjusted earnings per diluted share, excluding non-cash expense for stock options, costs related to litigation, and other discrete items, is estimated to be in the range of $7.05 to $7.25.  This compares to Chemed’s 2015 reported adjusted earnings per diluted share of $6.98.
 
The impact of diluted earnings per share from rebasing is approximately $0.56.  Excluding rebasing, 2016 guidance for adjusted earnings per diluted share would have been in the range of $7.61 to $7.81.

 
108

 

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Significant factors affecting our cash flows during 2015 and financial position at December 31, 2015, include the following:
 
●   
Our operations generated cash of $171.5 million.
●   
We repurchased $59.3 million of our stock in the open market using cash on hand.
●   
We spent $44.1 million on capital expenditures.
●   
A $56.3 million decrease in cash as a result of a net payment of long-term debt.
●   
An $18.3 million decrease in accounts receivable due to the timing of payments.
●   
A $12.0 million increase in properties and equipment due mainly to the purchase of water restoration equipment and  the construction of a stand-alone building for a Roto-Rooter branch location.
●   
A $5.6 million increase in goodwill related to the purchase of the Omaha and Scranton locations at Roto-Rooter.

The ratio of total debt to total capital was 15.1% at December 31, 2015, compared with 24.6% at December 31, 2014. Our current ratio was 0.88 and 0.99 at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease in the current ratio is a primarily a result of the decrease in accounts receivable and current deferred income taxes.

The 2014 Credit Agreement requires us to meet certain restrictive non-financial and financial covenants.  We are in compliance with all non-financial debt covenants as of December 31, 2015.  The restrictive financial covenants are defined in the 2014 Credit Agreement and include maximum leverage ratios, minimum fixed charge coverage and consolidated net worth ratios, limits on operating leases and minimum asset value limits.  We are in compliance with all financial debt covenants as of December 31, 2015, as follows:
 
Description
 
Requirement
 
Chemed
         
         
Leverage Ratio (Consolidated Indebtedness/Consolidated  Adj. EBITDA)
 
< 3.50 to 1.00
 
0.54 to 1.00
         
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Consolidated Free Cash Flow/Consolidated
       
Fixed Charges
 
> 1.50 to 1.00
 
2.18 to 1.00
         
Annual Operating Lease Commitment
 
< $50.0 million
 
$25.5 million

Our 2014 Credit Agreement replaced the 2013 Credit Agreement in May 2014.  We forecast to be in compliance with all debt covenants through fiscal 2016.

We have issued $37.8 million in standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2015, mainly for insurance purposes.  Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the revolving credit agreement.  As of December 31, 2015, we have approximately $312.2 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility.  We believe our cash flow from operating activities and our unused eligible lines of credit are sufficient to fund our obligations and operate our business in the near and long term.  We continually evaluate cash utilization alternatives, including share repurchase, debt repurchase, acquisitions, and increased dividends to determine the most beneficial use of available capital resources.

 
109

 

CASH FLOW
Our cash flows for 2015, 2014 and 2013 are summarized as follows (in millions):
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 171.5     $ 110.3     $ 150.8  
Capital expenditures
    (44.1 )     (43.6 )     (29.3 )
Operating cash after capital expenditures
    127.4       66.7       121.5  
Purchase of treasury stock in the open market
    (59.3 )     (110.0 )     (92.9 )
Net change in long-term debt
    (56.3 )     (39.5 )     -  
Business combinations
    (6.6 )     (0.3 )     (2.3 )
Dividends paid
    (15.6 )     (14.3 )     (14.1 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    15.4       23.9       17.1  
Increase/(decrease) in cash overdraft payable
    (1.2 )     9.7       (11.4 )
Other--net
    (3.2 )     (6.5 )     (3.0 )
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  $ 0.6     $ (70.3 )   $ 14.9  

2015 versus 2014
The net increase in cash flows generated between 2015 and 2014 of $70.9 million is mainly the result of a decrease in the purchase of treasury stock of $50.7 million (resulting in an increase in cash flow), an increase in cash provided by operating activities of $60.7 million offset by a change in the net payment of $16.8 million of long-term debt, a $10.9 million decrease in cash overdrafts payable and an $8.5 million decrease in proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
 
In 2015, we repurchased approximately 460,765 shares of Chemed capital stock at a weighted average price of $128.75 per share.  In 2014, we repurchased approximately 1.2 million shares of Chemed stock at a weighted average price of $93.01 per share.  Based on our current operations and our current sources of capital, we believe we have the ability to continue our current share repurchase program into the foreseeable future.
 
The change in net cash provided by operating activities is mainly the result of a $49.9 million increase in cash flows related to accounts receivable and a $26.8 million increase in cash flow related to accounts payable and other current liabilities offset by a $8.9 million decrease in cash flows related to excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation.
 
The increase in accounts payable and other current liabilities is mainly the result of the normal timing of payments with respect to accounts payable and accrued compensation.
 
Significant changes in our accounts receivable balances are driven mainly by the timing of payments received from the Federal government at our VITAS subsidiary.  We typically receive a payment in excess of $35.0 million from the Federal government from hospice services every other Friday.  The timing of year end will have a significant impact on the accounts receivable at VITAS.  These changes generally normalize over a two year period, as cash flow variations in one year are offset in the following year.
 
The change in overdrafts payable is also a function of the timing of cash payments made and cash receipts near year end.

2014 versus 2013
The net decrease in cash flows generated between 2014 and 2013 of $85.2 million is mainly the result of an increase in the purchase of treasury stock of $17.1 million (resulting in a decrease in cash flow), a $14.3 million increase in capital expenditures, a net payment of $39.5 million of long-term debt and a decrease in cash provided by operating activities of $40.5 million.  These decreases were offset by a $21.1 million increase due to changes in overdrafts payable.
 
In 2014, we repurchased approximately 1.2 million shares of Chemed capital stock at a weighted average price of $93.01 per share.  In 2013, we repurchased approximately 1.4 million shares of Chemed stock at a weighted average price of $68.50 per share.
 
 
110

 
 
The change in net cash provided by operating activities is mainly the result of a $66.2 million decrease in cash flows related to accounts payable and other current liabilities offset by an increase in the cash flows related to accounts receivable of $36.9 million.
 
The decrease in accounts payable and other current liabilities is mainly the result of payment in 2014 of $20.8 million of accrued but unpaid legal settlements as of December 31, 2013 and an increase in our Medicare Cap liability of $2.1 million between years.  The remainder of the increase is the result of the normal timing of payments with respect to accounts payable and accrued compensation.
 
Significant changes in our accounts receivable balances are driven mainly by the timing of payments received from the Federal government at our VITAS subsidiary.  We typically receive a payment in excess of $35.0 million from the Federal government from hospice services every other Friday.  The timing of year end will have a significant impact on the accounts receivable at VITAS.  These changes generally normalize over a two year period, as cash flow variations in one year are offset in the following year.
 
The change in overdrafts payable is also a function of the timing of cash payments made and cash receipts near year end.

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are subject to various lawsuits and claims in the normal course of our business.  In addition, we periodically receive communications from governmental and regulatory agencies concerning compliance with Medicare and Medicaid billing requirements at our VITAS subsidiary.  We establish reserves for specific, uninsured liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal action that we deem to be probable and estimable.  We disclose the existence of regulatory and legal actions when we believe it is reasonably possible that a loss could occur in connection with the specific action.  In most instances, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of any reasonably possible liability due to the uncertainty of the outcome and stage of litigation.  We record legal fees associated with legal and regulatory actions as the costs are incurred.

In connection with the sale of DuBois Chemicals, Inc. ("DuBois") in 1991, we provided allowances and accruals relating to several long-term costs, including income tax matters, lease commitments and environmental costs.  Additionally, we retained liability for casualty insurance claims for Service America and Patient Care that were incurred prior to the respective disposal dates, 2005 and 2002.  In the aggregate, we believe these allowances and accruals are adequate as of December 31, 2015.  Based on reviews of our environmental-related liabilities under the DuBois sale agreement, we have estimated our remaining liability to be $1.7 million. As of December 31, 2015, we are contingently liable for additional cleanup and related costs up to a maximum of $14.9 million.  We do not believe it is probable that we will be required to make any payment towards this contingent liability. Thus, no provision has been recorded in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.

      The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry.  As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions.  The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware.  It is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or estimable.

On May 2, 2013, the government filed a False Claims Act complaint against the Company and certain of its hospice-related subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al., No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”).  Prior to that date, the Company received various qui tam lawsuits and subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed.  The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002, VITAS, and since 2004, the Company, submitted or caused the submission of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course.  This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costs of the action, plus interest.  The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.  On September 30, 2014, the Court denied the motion, except to the extent that claims were filed before July 24, 2002. On November 13, 2014, the government filed a Second Amended Complaint.  The Second Amended Complaint changed and supplemented some of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of action or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS.  VITAS filed its Answer to the Second Amended Complaint on August 11, 2015.  The Company is not able to reasonably estimate the probability of loss or range of loss at this time.

 
111

 
 
For additional procedural history of this litigation, please refer to our prior quarterly and annual filings. The net costs incurred related to U.S. v. Vitas and related regulatory matters were $5.0 million, $2.1 million and $2.1 million for 2015, 2014 and 2013 respectively.

In November 2013, two shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against the Company’s current and former directors, as well as certain of its officers, both of which are covered by the Company’s commercial insurance.  On November 6, 2013, KBC Asset Management NV filed suit in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, KBC Asset Management NV, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. McNamara, et al., No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (D. Del.).  It sued Kevin McNamara, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Thomas Hutton, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, Arthur Tucker, Jr., George Walsh III, Frank Wood, Timothy O’Toole, David Williams and Ernest Mrozek, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that since at least 2004, Chemed, through VITAS, has submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare.  The suit alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants, and seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.
 
On November 14, 2013, Mildred A. North filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, North, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. Kevin McNamara, et al., No. 13 Civ. 833 (MDB) (S.D. Ohio).  She sued Kevin McNamara, David Williams, Timothy O’Toole, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, George Walsh III, Frank Wood and Thomas Hutton, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that, between February 2010 and the present, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties as officers and directors of Chemed by, among other things, (a) allegedly causing VITAS to submit improper and ineligible claims to Medicare and Medicaid; and (b) allegedly misrepresenting the state of Chemed’s internal controls.  The suit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control and gross mismanagement against the individual defendants.  The complaint also alleges unjust enrichment and insider trading against Messrs. McNamara, Williams and O’Toole.  Plaintiff seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.
 
On January 29, 2014 defendants in North filed a motion to transfer that case to Delaware under 28 U.S.C § 1404(a). On February 12, 2014, defendants in KBC filed a motion to dismiss that case pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 23.1 and 12(b)(6).  On September 19, 2014, the Ohio court granted defendants’ motion to transfer North to Delaware.  Following that decision and in light of that transfer, on September 29, 2014, the Delaware court denied without prejudice defendants’ motion to dismiss KBC, and referred both cases to Magistrate Judge Burke.
 
On October 15, 2014, Plaintiff KBC filed a motion to consolidate KBC with North.  On February 2, 2015 the court granted the motion for consolidation in full, appointing Plaintiff KBC the sole lead plaintiff and its counsel, the sole lead and liaison counsel.  The court ordered that both cases will proceed under the caption In re Chemed Corp. Shareholder and Derivative Litigation, No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (CJB) (D. Del.).  Plaintiff KBC has designated its pending complaint as the operative complaint in the consolidated proceedings.  Defendants subsequently renewed their motion to dismiss those claims and allegations.  On December 23, 2015, Magistrate Judge Burke issued a Report & Recommendation recommending that (1) defendants’ motion to dismiss be granted; (2) plaintiff be given 14 days from the date of affirmance by the district court to file an amended complaint addressing deficiencies with regard to their duty of loyalty claim; and (3) failure to do so should give rise to dismissal with prejudice.  The Report and Recommendation remains subject to review and affirmance by the district court judge overseeing the matter.  On January 11, 2016, Lead Plaintiff KBC filed Objections to the Report and Recommendations.  Defendants responses to those Objections were filed on January 28, 2016.
 
The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits.  Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, responding to the subpoenas and dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity.  Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
 
 
112

 

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The table below summarizes our debt and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2015 (in thousands):

         
Less than
               
After
 
   
Total
   
1 year
   
1-3 Years
   
4 -5 Years
   
5 Years
 
Long-term debt obligations (a)
  $ 91,250     $ 7,500     $ 18,750     $ 65,000     $ -  
Interest on long-term debt
    3,509       1,140       1,946       423       -  
Operating lease obligations
    79,094       21,679       28,235       14,886       14,294  
Purchase obligations (b)
    43,695       43,695       -       -       -  
Other long-term obligations (c)
    60,873       2,851       5,704       2,851       49,467  
Total contractual cash obligations
  $ 278,421     $ 76,865     $ 54,635     $ 83,160     $ 63,761  
                                         
(a) Represents the face value of the obligation.
 
(b) Purchase obligations primarily consist of accounts payable at December 31, 2015.
 
(c) Other long-term obligations comprise largely excess benefit obligations.
 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2015 Versus 2014 – Consolidated Results
Set forth below are the year-to-year changes in the components of the statement of operations relating to income for 2015 versus 2014 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
   
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Service revenues and sales
           
VITAS
  $ 51,346       5 %
Roto-Rooter
    35,760       9  
Total
    87,106       6  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    (52,937 )     (5 )
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (15,232 )     (7 )
Depreciation
    (2,488 )     (8 )
Amortization
    (410 )     (57 )
Income from operations
    16,039       10  
Interest expense
    4,541       55  
Other income - net
    (3,208 )     127  
Income before income taxes
    17,372       11  
Income taxes
    (6,415 )     (10 )
Net income
  $ 10,957       11  

The VITAS segment revenue increase is the result of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
             
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Routine homecare
  $ 54,732       7 %
Continuous care
    (1,404 )     (1 )
General inpatient
    (3,437 )     (3 )
Medicare cap
    1,455       113  
    $ 51,346       5  

The increase in VITAS’ revenue from 2014 to 2015 was a combination of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing approximately 1.4%, an increase in days of care of 5.5% driven by an increase in admissions of 2.8% and geographical and level of care mix shift.  For 2015, VITAS recorded a Medicare Cap reversal of $165,000 related to eliminating the Medicare Cap billing limitation recorded in the fourth quarter of 2014.

 
113

 
 
Days of care increased as the result of the following:
 
   
Days of Care
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
Percent
 
                   
Routine homecare
    5,258,660       4,959,658       6  
Continuous Care
    206,405       207,207       -  
General inpatient
    150,424       156,421       (4 )
Total days of care
    5,615,489       5,323,286       6  
 
The Roto-Rooter segment revenue increase is the result of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Plumbing
  $ 13,072       8 %
Sewer and drain cleaning
    1,484       1  
Contractor operations
    1,470       4  
Water restoration
    19,683       107  
Other
    51       -  
    $ 35,760       9  

Plumbing revenues for 2015 increased 7.5% when compared to 2014 due to a 0.4% increase in the number of jobs performed and a 7.1% increase in price and service mix.   Sewer and drain cleaning revenues increased 1.1% when compared to 2014 due to a 4.2% decrease in the number of jobs performed offset by a 5.3% increase in price and service mix shift.   Water restoration increased 106.5% as a result of continued expansion of this service offering into other Roto-Rooter locations.  Water restoration is the remediation or removal of water and humidity after a flood.  Contractor operations revenue increased 4.0% and Other Roto-Rooter revenue was essentially flat.

The consolidated gross margin excluding depreciation was 29.5% in 2015 versus 29.0% in 2014.  On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin excluding depreciation was 22.7% in 2015 and 22.4% in 2014.  Roto-Rooter’s gross margin excluding depreciation was 47.4% in 2015 and 46.7% in 2014.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) for 2015 comprise (in thousands):

   
2015
   
2014
 
SG&A expenses before long-term incentive
           
compensation, OIG expenses and the impact
           
of market gains of deferred compensation plans
  $ 225,180     $ 214,761  
Long-term incentive compensation
    7,519       2,569  
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    4,974       2,141  
Impact of market value gains on liabilities
               
held in deferred compensation trusts
    148       3,118  
Total SG&A expenses
  $ 237,821     $ 222,589  

SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation, OIG expenses and the impact of market gains of deferred compensation plans increased $10.4 million (4.9%) from 2014 to 2015.  This increase was mainly a result of the increase in variable expenses caused by increased revenue, increased cash incentive compensation expense due to better operating performance as well as normal salary increases in 2015.
 
Depreciation expense increased $2.5 million (8.3%) in 2015 mainly due to an increase in capital expenditures in the current and prior year.
 
Interest expense decreased $4.5 million (55.5%) from 2014 to 2015 primarily as a result of the retirement of our Convertible Notes in 2014.

 
114

 
 
Other income/(expense)-net for 2015 and 2014 comprise (in thousands):
 
   
2015
   
2014
 
Market value gains on assets held in deferred
           
compensation trusts
  $ 148     $ 3,118  
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    (698 )     (640 )
Interest income/ (expense)
    281       (29 )
Other
    (418 )     72  
Total other income/(expense)
  $ (687 )   $ 2,521  

Our effective tax rate was 38.8% in 2015 compared to 39.0% for 2014.

Net income for both periods include the following aftertax adjustments that increased/ (reduced) aftertax earnings (in thousands):

   
2015
   
2014
 
VITAS
           
Costs associated with the OIG investigation
  $ (3,072 )   $ (1,328 )
Litigation settlement costs
    -       (70 )
Acquisition expense
    -       (1 )
Roto-Rooter
               
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (3 )     (4 )
Acquisition expense
    (104 )     (14 )
Corporate
               
Long-term incentive compensation
    (4,752 )     (1,625 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting of convertible debt
    -       (2,143 )
Costs related to securities litigation
    (23 )     (207 )
Stock option expense
    (3,439 )     (3,022 )
Total
  $ (11,393 )   $ (8,414 )

2015 Versus 2014 – Segment Results
The change in net income for 2015 versus 2014 is due to (in thousands, except percentages):
 
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
VITAS
  $ 7,160       8 %
Roto-Rooter
    6,498       15  
Corporate
    (2,701 )     (9 )
    $ 10,957       11  
 
VITAS’ after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2015 compared to 2014 by a $51.3 million increase in revenue.  This revenue increase is a result of an increase of 5.5% in days of care, driven by a 2.8% increase in admissions and a $1.5 million revenue increase due to the Medicare cap when compared to 2014.  After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue in 2015 were 8.4% as compared to 8.1% in 2014.

Roto-Rooter’s after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2015 compared to 2014 by a $19.7 million revenue increase in Roto-Rooter’s water restoration line of business and a $13.1 million revenue increase in Roto-Rooter’s plumbing line of business..  After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at Roto-Rooter in 2015 were 11.4% as compared to 10.7% in 2014.

After-tax Corporate expenses for 2015 increased 9.3% when compared to 2014 mainly due to increased LTIP and bonus expense in 2015.

 
115

 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2014 Versus 2013 – Consolidated Results
Set forth below are the year-to-year changes in the components of the statement of operations relating to income for 2014 versus 2013 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
   
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Service revenues and sales
           
VITAS
  $ 19,092       2 %
Roto-Rooter
    23,861       6  
Total
    42,953       3  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    (25,865 )     (3 )
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (7,025 )     (3 )
Depreciation
    (2,183 )     (8 )
Amortization
    924       56  
Other operating expenses
    26,221       100  
Income from operations
    35,025       26  
Interest expense
    6,849       46  
Other income - net
    (2,949 )     (54 )
Income before income taxes
    38,925       31  
Income taxes
    (16,835 )     (36 )
Net income
  $ 22,090       29  

The VITAS segment revenue increase is the result of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Routine homecare
  $ 18,678       2 %
Continuous care
    (3,203 )     (2 )
General inpatient
    (2,092 )     (2 )
Medicare cap
    5,709       82  
    $ 19,092       2  

The increase in VITAS’ revenue from 2013 to 2014 was a combination of Medicare reimbursement rates increasing approximately 1.4%, partially offset by a 0.5% decline due to sequestration (which was effective April 1, 2013), an increase in ADC of 1.4% driven by an increase in admissions of 2.0% and geographical and level of care mix shift.  For 2014, VITAS recorded a net Medicare cap charge of $1.3 million related to eliminating the Medicare Cap billing limitation recorded in the fourth quarter of 2013 offset by two programs’ projected Medicare Cap liability.  This compares to $7.0 million in additional Medicare cap liability recorded in 2013.  The ADC increase was driven by a 1.7% increase in routine homecare offset by a decrease of 2.9% in continuous care and a 2.3% decrease in general inpatient.  ADC is a key measure we use to monitor volume growth in our hospice programs.  Changes in total program admissions, discharges and average length of stay for our patients are the main drivers of changes in ADC.
 
The Roto-Rooter segment revenue increase is the result of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Plumbing
  $ 6,051       4 %
Sewer and drain cleaning
    (205 )     -  
Contractor operations
    3,466       10  
Water restoration
    15,438       507  
Other
    (889 )     4  
    $ 23,861       6  

 
116

 
 
Plumbing revenues for 2014 increased 3.6% when compared to 2013 due to a 1.5% increase in the number of jobs performed and a 2.1% increase in price and service mix.   Sewer and drain cleaning revenues were essentially flat when compared to 2013 due to a 3.5% decrease in the number of jobs performed offset by a 3.4% increase in price and service mix shift.   Contractor operations revenue increased 10.5% as a result of performance of acquisitions in 2014 and 2013 and higher job count.  Water restoration is a Roto-Rooter new line of business, and is the remediation of water and humidity damage after a flood.

The consolidated gross margin excluding depreciation was 29.0% in 2014 versus 28.6% in 2013.  On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin excluding depreciation was 22.4% in 2014 and 22.2% in 2013.  Roto-Rooter’s gross margin excluding depreciation was 46.7% in 2014 and 47.0% in 2013.

Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) for 2014 comprise (in thousands):
 
   
2014
   
2013
 
SG&A expenses before long-term incentive
           
compensation, OIG expenses and the impact
           
of market gains of deferred compensation plans
  $ 214,761     $ 207,131  
Long-term incentive compensation
    2,569       1,301  
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    2,141       2,149  
Impact of market value gains on liabilities
               
held in deferred compensation trusts
    3,118       4,982  
Total SG&A expenses
  $ 222,589     $ 215,563  

Depreciation expense increased $2.2 million (7.9%) in 2014 mainly due to an increase in capital expenditures in the prior year.

Amortization expense decreased $924,000 (56.2%) in 2014 due to a decrease in intangible amortization related to network relationships.

Other operating expenses comprise (in thousands):

   
2014
   
2013
 
             
Litigation settlement of VITAS segment
  $ -     $ 10,500  
Settlements of Roto-Rooter segment
    -       15,721  
Total other operating expenses
  $ -     $ 26,221  

Interest expense decreased $6.8 million (45.6%) from 2013 to 2014 primarily as a result of the retirement of our Convertible Notes.

Other income-net for 2014 and 2013 comprise (in thousands):
 
             
   
2014
   
2013
 
Market value gains on assets held in deferred
           
compensation trusts
  $ 3,118     $ 4,982  
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    (640 )     (320 )
Interest income/ (expense)
    (29 )     847  
Other
    72       (39 )
Total other income
  $ 2,521     $ 5,470  

Our effective tax rate was 39.0% in 2014 compared to 37.6% for 2013.  This is a result of a $1.8 million credit recorded in 2013 related to the expiration of tax statutes for uncertain tax positions recorded in prior years that did not repeat in 2014.

 
117

 
 
Net income for both periods include the following aftertax adjustments that increased/ (reduced) aftertax earnings (in thousands):

   
2014
   
2013
 
VITAS
           
Costs associated with the OIG investigation
  $ (1,328 )   $ (1,333 )
Litigation settlement
    -       (6,510 )
Litigation settlement costs
    (70 )     -  
Acquisition expense
    (1 )     (36 )
Roto-Rooter
               
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (4 )     (865 )
Litigation settlements
    -       (9,551 )
Acquisition expense
    (14 )     (2 )
Expenses of severance arrangements
    -       (184 )
Corporate
               
Long-term incentive compensation
    (1,625 )     (822 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting of convertible debt
    (2,143 )     (5,448 )
Costs related to securities litigation
    (207 )     (69 )
Stock option expense
    (3,022 )     (3,813 )
Uncertain tax position adjustments
    -       1,782  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    -       (294 )
Total
  $ (8,414 )   $ (27,145 )

2014 Versus 2013 – Segment Results
The change in net income for 2014 versus 2013 is due to (in thousands, except percentages):
 
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
VITAS
  $ 10,041       13 %
Roto-Rooter
    12,832       44  
Corporate
    (783 )     (3 )
    $ 22,090       29  

VITAS’ after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2014 compared to 2014 by a $19.1 million increase in revenue.  This revenue increase is a result of an increase of 1.4% in ADC, driven by a 2.0% increase in admissions and a $5.7 million decrease in the Medicare cap charge when compared to 2013.  After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue in 2014, excluding the impact of litigation settlements in 2013, were 8.1% as compared to 8.0% in 2013.

Roto-Rooter’s after-tax earnings were positively impacted in 2014 compared to 2013 by a $15.4 million revenue increase in Roto-Rooter’s water restoration line of business.  After-tax earnings as a percent of revenue at Roto-Rooter in 2014, excluding the impact of the litigation settlements, were 10.7% as compared to 10.5% in 2013.

After-tax Corporate expenses for 2014 increased 2.8% when compared to 2013 mainly due to the higher cost of liability insurance in 2014.

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue Recognition
For both the Roto-Rooter and VITAS segments, service revenues and sales are recognized when the earnings process has been completed.  Generally, this occurs when services are provided or products are delivered. Sales of Roto-Rooter products, including drain cleaning machines and drain cleaning solution, comprise less than 3% of our total service revenues and sales for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2014.

VITAS recognizes revenue at the estimated net realizable amount due from third-party payers, which are primarily Medicare and Medicaid.  Payers may deny payment for services in whole or in part on the basis that such services are not eligible for coverage and do not qualify for reimbursement.  We estimate denials each period and make adequate provision in the financial statements.  The estimate of denials is based on historical trends and known circumstances and generally does not vary materially from period to period on an aggregate basis.  Medicare billings are subject to certain limitations, as described below.
 
 
118

 
 
VITAS is subject to certain limitations on Medicare payments for services.  Specifically, if the number of inpatient care days any hospice program provides to Medicare beneficiaries exceeds 20% of the total days of Medicare hospice care such program provides to all patients for an annual period beginning September 28, the days in excess of the 20% figure may be reimbursed only at the routine homecare rate.  We have never had a program reach the inpatient cap.  The majority of our programs have expected cushion in excess of 75% of the inpatient cap for the 2014 measurement period.  Due to the significant cushion at each program, we do not anticipate it to be reasonably likely that any program will be subject to the inpatient cap in the foreseeable future.
 
VITAS is also subject to a Medicare annual per-beneficiary cap.  Compliance with the Medicare cap is measured in one of two ways based on a provider by provider election.  The “stream lined” method compares the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by that Medicare provider number between November 1 of each year and October 31 of the following year with the product of the per-beneficiary cap amount and the number of Medicare beneficiaries electing hospice care for the first time from that hospice program or programs during the relevant period.
 
The “proportional” method compares the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by the Medicare provider number between September 28 and September 27 of the following year with the product of the per beneficiary cap amount and a pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving hospice services from that program during the same period.  The pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries is calculated based on the ratio of days the beneficiary received hospice services during the measurement period to the total number of days the beneficiary received hospice services.
 
We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific admissions, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether they are likely to exceed the Medicare cap.  Should we determine that a provider number is likely to exceed the Medicare cap based on projected trends, we attempt to institute corrective action to influence the patient mix or to increase patient admissions.  However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare cap, we estimate the amount of revenue recognized during the period that will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare cap and record that amount as a reduction in service revenue.
 
Our estimate of the Medicare cap liability is particularly sensitive to allocations made by our fiscal intermediary relative to patient transfers between hospices.  We are allocated a percentage of the Medicare cap based on the total days a patient spent in hospice care.  The allocation for patient transfers cannot be determined until a patient dies.  As the number of days a patient spends in hospice is based on a future event, this allocation process may take several years.  If the actual relationship of transfers in and transfers out for a given measurement period proves to be different for any program at or near a billing limitation, our estimate of the liability would increase or decrease on a dollar-for-dollar basis.  While our method has historically been materially accurate, each program can vary during a given measurement period.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2015 we recorded a $165,000 Medicare cap reversal of amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2014 for one program’s projected 2015 measurement period liability.  During the year ended December 31, 2014, we recorded a net  Medicare cap liability of $1.3 million for two programs’ projected 2014 and 2015 measurement period liability offset by the reversal of one program’s 2011 measurement period projected Medicare cap liability.     During the year ended December 31, 2013, we reversed the Medicare cap liability for amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 for three programs’ projected 2013 measurement period liability.  During 2013 this reversal was offset by the Medicare cap liability for two programs’ projected 2014 measurement period liability.
 
In 2013, the U.S. government implemented automatic budget reductions of 2.0% for all government payees, including hospice benefits paid under the Medicare program.  In 2015, CMS determined that the Medicare cap should be calculated “as if” sequestration did not occur.  As a result of this decision, VITAS has received notification from our third party intermediary that an additional $1.9 million is owed for Medicare cap in two programs arising during the 2013 and 2014 measurement periods.  The amounts are automatically deducted from our semi-monthly PIP payments.  We do not believe that CMS is authorized under the sequestration authority or the statutory methodology for establishing the Medicare cap to the amounts they have withheld and intend to withhold under their current “as if” methodology.  We have not recorded a reserve as of December 31, 2015 for the $1.9 million potential exposure.  We have appealed CMS’s methodology change with the appropriate regulatory appeal board. Until resolution is reached, to the extent we have a program or programs at or near the Medicare cap limit, we may be exposed to further losses which at this time cannot be reasonably estimated.  Although the Company intends to exhaust its administrative appeal rights and, if necessary, vigorously defend its position through civil action, there can be no assurance that this matter will not have a material adverse affect on the Company.
 
 
119

 
 
Shown below is the Medicare cap liability activity for the years end December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
 
   
2015
   
2014
 
Beginning Balance January 1,
  $ 6,112     $ 8,260  
2015 measurement period
    (165 )     165  
2014 measurement period
    -       1,451  
2011 measurement period
    -       (325 )
Payments
    (4,782 )     (3,439 )
Ending Balance December 31,
  $ 1,165     $ 6,112  

Insurance Accruals
For the Roto-Rooter segment and Chemed’s Corporate Office, we initially self-insure for all casualty insurance claims (workers’ compensation, auto liability and general liability).  As a result, we closely monitor and frequently evaluate our historical claims experience to estimate the appropriate level of accrual for self-insured claims.  Our third-party administrator (“TPA”) processes and reviews claims on a monthly basis.  Currently, our exposure on any single claim is capped at $750,000.  In developing our estimates, we accumulate historical claims data for the previous 10 years to calculate loss development factors (“LDF”) by insurance coverage type.  LDFs are applied to known claims to estimate the ultimate potential liability for known and unknown claims for each open policy year.  LDFs are updated annually.  Because this methodology relies heavily on historical claims data, the key risk is whether the historical claims are an accurate predictor of future claims exposure.  The risk also exists that certain claims have been incurred and not reported on a timely basis.  To mitigate these risks, in conjunction with our TPA, we closely monitor claims to ensure timely accumulation of data and compare claims trends with the industry experience of our TPA.
 
For the VITAS segment, we initially self-insure for workers’ compensation claims.  Currently, VITAS’ exposure on any single claim is capped at $1,000,000.  For VITAS’ self-insurance accruals for workers’ compensation, the valuation methods used are similar to those used internally for our other business units. We are also insured for other risks with respect to professional liability with a deductible of $750.000.
 
Our casualty insurance liabilities are recorded gross before any estimated recovery for amounts exceeding our stop loss limits.  Estimated recoveries from insurance carriers are recorded as accounts receivable.  Claims experience adjustments to our casualty and workers’ compensation accrual for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013, were net pretax debits/(credits) of ($1,891,000),  $542,000 and ($1,487,000) respectively.
 
As an indication of the sensitivity of the accrued liability to reported claims, our analysis indicates that a 1% across-the-board increase or decrease in the amount of projected losses would increase or decrease the accrued insurance liability at December 31, 2015, by $2.9 million or 7.0%.  While the amount recorded represents our best estimate of the casualty and workers’ compensation insurance liability, we have calculated, based on historical claims experience, the actual loss could reasonably be expected to increase or decrease by approximately $2.7 million as of December 31, 2015.

Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.  Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amount of assets and liabilities and their tax basis.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in our opinion, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized due to insufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward period available under the tax laws. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in laws and rates on the date of enactment.
 
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17 which simplifies the balance sheet classification required for deferred tax balances.  It allows for a company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities to be netted into a noncurrent account, either asset or liability, by jurisdiction.  The ASU is required to be adopted for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and the interim periods within that annual period.  Early adoption is permitted.  Companies have the choice to adopt prospectively or retrospectively.  In order to simplify our balance sheet classification required for deferred tax balances, we adopted the ASU for our annual balance sheet as of December 31, 2015 on a prospective basis.  Prior periods have not been retrospectively adjusted.  We do not believe that this change resulted in a material comparability issue between years on our balance sheet.

 
120

 
 
We are subject to income taxes in the federal and most state jurisdictions.  We are periodically audited by various taxing authorities.  Significant judgment is required to determine our provision for income taxes.  We adopted FASB’s authoritative guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which prescribes a comprehensive model for how to recognize, measure, present and disclose in financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return.  Upon adoption of this guidance, the financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of such uncertain positions assuming the taxing authorities’ full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets arise from purchase business combinations and are amortized using either an accelerated method or the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The selection of an amortization method is based on which method best reflects the economic pattern of usage of the asset.
 
The date of our annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis is October 1.  The VITAS trade name is considered to have an indefinite life.  We also capitalize the direct costs of obtaining licenses to operate either hospice programs or plumbing operations subject to a minimum capitalization threshold.  These costs are amortized over the life of the license using the straight line method.  Certificates of Need (CON), which are required in certain states for hospice operations, are generally granted without expiration and thus, we believe them to be indefinite-lived assets subject to impairment testing.
 
We consider that RRC, RRSC and VITAS are appropriate reporting units for testing goodwill impairment.  We consider RRC and RRSC as separate reporting units but one operating segment.  This is appropriate as they each have their own set of general ledger accounts that can be analyzed at “one level below an operating segment” per the definition of a reporting unit in FASB guidance.
 
In July 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU” No. 2012-02 – Intangibles Goodwill and Other which provides additional guidance related to the impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets.  ASU No. 2012–02 allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform further impairment testing.  The revised guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012, but early adoption was permitted.  Our impairment testing date is October 1 of each year and we adopted the new guidelines in the third quarter of 2012.
 
We completed our qualitative analysis for impairment of goodwill and our indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2015.  We assessed such qualitative factors as macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, financial performance and the legislative and regulatory environment.  Based on our assessment, we do not believe that it is more likely than not that our reporting units’ or indefinite-lived assets fair values are less than their carrying values.

Stock-based Compensation Plans
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period on a straight-line basis. We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model.  We estimate the fair value and derived service periods of market based awards using a Monte Carlo simulation approach in a risk neutral framework.  We determine expected term, volatility, dividend yield and forfeiture rate based on our historical experience.  We believe that historical experience is the best indicator of these factors.

Contingencies
We are subject to various lawsuits and claims in the normal course of our business.  In addition, we periodically receive communications from governmental and regulatory agencies concerning compliance with Medicare and Medicaid billing requirements at our VITAS subsidiary.  We establish reserves for specific, uninsured liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal action that we deem to be probable and estimable.  We record legal fees associated with legal and regulatory actions as the costs are incurred.  We disclose material loss contingencies that probable but not reasonably estimable and those that are at least reasonably possible.

 
121

 
 
Consolidating Summary of Adjusted EBITDA
 
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
 
(in thousands)
                    Chemed  
2015  
VITAS
   
Roto-Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
                         
Net income/(loss)
  $ 93,346     $ 48,573     $ (31,645 )   $ 110,274  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Interest expense
    200       348       3,097       3,645  
Income taxes
    56,675       29,630       (16,453 )     69,852  
Depreciation
    18,789       12,988       592       32,369  
Amortization
    758       372       -       1,130  
EBITDA
    169,768       91,911       (44,409 )     217,270  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Intercompany interest/(expense)
    (7,499 )     (3,385 )     10,884       -  
Interest income
    (241 )     (40 )     -       (281 )
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    4,974       -       -       4,974  
Acquisition expenses
    -       172       -       172  
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    -       5       -       5  
Advertising cost adjustment
    -       (1,317 )     -       (1,317 )
Stock option expense
    -       -       5,445       5,445  
Stock award expense
    496       268       1,343       2,107  
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       7,519       7,519  
Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       -       37       37  
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 167,498     $ 87,614     $ (19,181 )   $ 235,931  
                           
Chemed
 
2014  
VITAS
   
Roto-Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
                                 
Net income/(loss)
  $ 86,186     $ 42,075     $ (28,944 )   $ 99,317  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Interest expense
    207       363       7,616       8,186  
Income taxes
    53,278       25,808       (15,649 )     63,437  
Depreciation
    18,601       10,702       578       29,881  
Amortization
    447       273       -       720  
EBITDA
    158,719       79,221       (36,399 )     201,541  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Intercompany interest/(expense)
    (6,189 )     (2,892 )     9,081       -  
Interest income
    78       (39 )     (10 )     29  
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    2,141       -       -       2,141  
Acquisition expenses
    1       23       -       24  
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    113       7       -       120  
Advertising cost adjustment
    -       (1,462 )     -       (1,462 )
Stock option expense
    -       -       4,802       4,802  
Stock award expense
    586       252       1,633       2,471  
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       2,569       2,569  
Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       -       327       327  
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 155,449     $ 75,110     $ (17,997 )   $ 212,562  
                            Chemed  
2013   VITAS     Roto-Rooter     Corporate     Consolidated  
                                 
Net income/(loss)
  $ 76,144     $ 29,243     $ (28,160 )   $ 77,227  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Interest expense
    182       322       14,531       15,035  
Income taxes
    46,910       17,560       (17,868 )     46,602  
Depreciation
    18,149       9,014       535       27,698  
Amortization
    1,386       259       -       1,645  
EBITDA
    142,771       56,398       (30,962 )     168,207  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Intercompany interest/(expense)
    (4,288 )     (2,055 )     6,343       -  
Interest income
    (750 )     (41 )     (56 )     (847 )
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    2,149       -       -       2,149  
Acquisition expenses
    58       4       -       62  
Litigation settlement
    10,500       15,721       -       26,221  
Expenses of litigation settlements
    -       1,425       -       1,425  
Advertising cost adjustment
    -       (1,166 )     -       (1,166 )
Expenses of severance arrangements
    -       302       -       302  
Stock option expense
    -       -       6,042       6,042  
Stock award expense
    716       348       1,981       3,045  
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       1,301       1,301  
Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       -       109       109  
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 151,156     $ 70,936     $ (15,242 )   $ 206,850  
 
 
122

 
 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME
 
(in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited)
 
                   
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2015
   
2014
   
2013
 
Net income as reported
  $ 110,274     $ 99,317     $ 77,227  
                         
Add/(deduct) after-tax cost of:
                       
Non-cash expense of change in accounting for convertible
    -       2,143       5,448  
Stock option expense
    3,439       3,022       3,813  
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    3,072       1,328       1,333  
Net expenses related to litigation settlements
    3       74       865  
Long-term incentive compensation
    4,752       1,625       822  
Expenses related to securities litigation
    23       207       69  
Acquisition expenses
    104       15       38  
Litigation settlements
    -       -       16,061  
Uncertain tax position adjustments
    -       -       (1,782 )
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    -       -       294  
Expenses of severance arrangements
    -       -       184  
Adjusted net income
  $ 121,667     $ 107,731     $ 104,372  
                         
Diluted Earnings Per Share As Reported
                       
Net income
  $ 6.33     $ 5.57     $ 4.16  
Average number of shares outstanding
    17,422       17,840       18,585  
                         
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share
                       
Net income
  $ 6.98     $ 6.07     $ 5.62  
Average number of shares outstanding
    17,422       17,738 *     18,585  
                         
*For the purpose of computing adjusted diluted earnings per share for 2014, the estimated dilutive impact of the convertible notes prior to the conversion of these notes on May 15, 2014 (impact of 102,000) has been excluded from the computation of diluted average shares outstanding as this impact was entirely offset by the exercise of the note hedges on May 15, 2014.
 

The "Footnotes to Financial Statements" are integral parts of this financial information.
 
 
123

 

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT
 
(unaudited)
 
                         
   
Three Months Ended December 31,
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
OPERATING STATISTICS
 
2015
   
2014
   
2015
   
2014
 
Net revenue ($000)
                       
Homecare
  $ 224,278     $ 209,633     $ 865,145     $ 810,413  
Inpatient
    22,954       25,839       99,439       102,876  
Continuous care
    37,238       38,405       150,802       152,206  
Total before Medicare cap allowance
  $ 284,470     $ 273,877     $ 1,115,386     $ 1,065,495  
Medicare cap allowance
    -       506       165       (1,290 )
Total
  $ 284,470     $ 274,383     $ 1,115,551     $ 1,064,205  
Net revenue as a percent of total before Medicare cap allowance
                               
Homecare
    78.8 %     76.6 %     77.6 %     76.0 %
Inpatient
    8.1       9.4       8.9       9.7  
Continuous care
    13.1       14.0       13.5       14.3  
Total before Medicare cap allowance
    100.0       100.0       100.0       100.0  
Medicare cap allowance
    -       0.2       -       (0.1 )
Total
    100.0 %     100.2 %     100.0 %     99.9 %
Average daily census (days)
                               
Homecare
    11,707       10,850       11,372       10,634  
Nursing home
    3,062       2,995       3,035       2,954  
Routine homecare
    14,769       13,845       14,407       13,588  
Inpatient
    377       427       412       428  
Continuous care
    551       566       566       568  
Total
    15,697       14,838       15,385       14,584  
Total Admissions
    15,790       16,313       65,872       64,090  
Total Discharges
    15,915       16,333       64,900       63,478  
Average length of stay (days)
    89.8       82.7       81.6       82.4  
Median length of stay (days)
    17.0       15.0       15.0       15.0  
ADC by major diagnosis
                               
Neurological
    22.8 %     25.4 %     23.2 %     30.1 %
Cancer
    15.6       17.2       16.4       17.3  
Cardio
    17.4       17.8       17.4       17.0  
Cerebro
    29.9       26.4       29.1       20.6  
Respiratory
    7.7       7.8       7.8       7.9  
Other
    6.6       5.4       6.1       7.1  
Total
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Admissions by major diagnosis
                               
Neurological
    12.1 %     13.2 %     12.3 %     18.6 %
Cancer
    31.5       33.1       32.0       33.3  
Cardio
    15.2       15.2       15.3       14.9  
Cerebro
    19.7       17.7       19.0       11.5  
Respiratory
    9.5       9.3       9.9       9.4  
Other
    12.0       11.5       11.5       12.3  
Total
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Direct patient care margins
                               
Routine homecare
    54.7 %     54.9 %     53.4 %     53.8 %
Inpatient
    1.3       7.2       5.0       5.8  
Continuous care
    16.1       18.2       16.1       17.4  
Homecare margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
                               
Labor costs
  $ 53.96     $ 53.06     $ 55.58     $ 53.99  
Drug costs
    6.63       6.90       6.68       7.01  
Home medical equipment
    6.61       6.41       6.57       6.61  
Medical supplies
    2.84       3.10       2.90       3.18  
Inpatient margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
                               
Labor costs
  $ 358.21     $ 327.53     $ 350.06     $ 339.90  
Continuous care margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
                               
Labor costs
  $ 596.21     $ 582.69     $ 592.48     $ 585.61  
Bad debt expense as a percent of revenues
    1.0 %     1.0 %     1.0 %     1.0 %
Accounts receivable --
                               
Days of revenue outstanding- excluding unapplied Medicare payments
    37.5       38.9    
N.A.
   
N.A.
 
Days of revenue outstanding- including unapplied Medicare payments
    26.7       33.6    
N.A.
   
N.A.
 

 
124

 
 
SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements and performance trends that are based upon assumptions subject to certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors. Such forward-looking statements and trends include, but are not limited to, the impact of laws and regulations on our operations, our estimate of future effective income tax rates and the recoverability of deferred tax assets. Variances in any or all of the risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors from our assumptions could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements and trends. Our ability to deal with the unknown outcomes of these events, many of which are beyond our control, may affect the reliability of our projections and other financial matters.
 
 
125