EX-13 5 a50809562ex13.htm EXHIBIT 13 a50809562ex13.htm
EXHIBIT 13
 
 

Financial Review

 
Contents
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
52
Consolidated Statement of Income
53
Consolidated Balance Sheet
54
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows
55
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
56
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
57
Unaudited Summary of Quarterly Results
82
Selected Financial Data
84
Unaudited Consolidating Statements of Income
85
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations
88


MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

    The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as that term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and disposition of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorization of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
 
The Company’s management, including the President and Chief Executive Officer, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President and Controller, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on the framework established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this evaluation, management concluded that internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO.

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm, has audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, as stated in their report which appears on page 52.
 
 
51

 
 
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Chemed Corporation:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders' equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Chemed Corporation and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.  Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (1992) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).  The Company's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.  Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits.  We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.  Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk.  Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.  A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.











/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Cincinnati, OH
February 27, 2014

 
52

 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
                   
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                 
(in thousands, except per share data)
                 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
                   
Service revenues and sales
  $ 1,413,329     $ 1,430,043     $ 1,355,970  
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation)
    1,008,808       1,033,321       970,484  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    212,518       208,656       202,260  
Depreciation
    27,698       26,009       25,247  
Amortization
    4,690       4,512       4,252  
Other operating expenses (Note 21)
    26,221       1,126       -  
Total costs and expenses
    1,279,935       1,273,624       1,202,243  
Income from operations
    133,394       156,419       153,727  
Interest expense
    (15,035 )     (14,723 )     (13,888 )
Other income--net (Note 10)
    5,470       4,123       717  
Income before income taxes
    123,829       145,819       140,556  
Income taxes (Note 11)
    (46,602 )     (56,515 )     (54,577 )
Net Income
  $ 77,227     $ 89,304     $ 85,979  
                         
Earnings Per Share (Note 15)
                       
Net Income
  $ 4.24     $ 4.72     $ 4.19  
Average number of shares outstanding
    18,199       18,924       20,523  
Diluted Earnings Per Share (Note 15)
                       
Net Income
  $ 4.16     $ 4.62     $ 4.10  
Average number of shares outstanding
    18,585       19,339       20,945  
                         
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
                 
 
 
53

 
 
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
 
       
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
           
(in thousands, except shares and per share data)
           
December 31,
 
2013
   
2012
 
Assets
           
     Current assets
           
          Cash and cash equivalents (Note 9)
  $ 84,418     $ 69,531  
          Accounts receivable less allowances of  $12,590 (2012 - $10,892)
    91,770       93,333  
          Inventories
    6,703       7,058  
          Current deferred income taxes (Note 11)
    20,257       13,659  
          Prepaid income taxes
    3,690       2,643  
          Prepaid expenses
    17,818       11,447  
               Total current assets
    224,656       197,671  
     Investments of deferred compensation plans held in trust (Notes 14 and 16)
    42,465       36,089  
     Properties and equipment, at cost, less accumulated depreciation (Note 12)
    92,955       91,934  
     Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization of  $32,055 (2012 - $30,414) (Note 6)
    56,556       57,177  
     Goodwill
    466,871       465,832  
     Other assets
    10,198       10,923  
Total Assets
  $ 893,701     $ 859,626  
                 
Liabilities
               
     Current liabilities
               
          Accounts payable
  $ 41,758     $ 48,472  
          Current portion of long-term debt (Note 3)
    183,564       -  
          Income taxes (Note 11)
    111       4,938  
          Accrued insurance
    41,859       40,654  
          Accrued compensation
    48,323       45,457  
          Accrued legal
    23,210       1,161  
          Other current liabilities
    25,161       16,140  
               Total current liabilities
    363,986       156,822  
     Deferred income taxes (Note 11)
    27,301       27,662  
     Long-term debt (Note 3)
    -       174,890  
     Deferred compensation liabilities (Note 14)
    42,348       35,599  
     Other liabilities
    11,176       11,362  
                    Total Liabilities
    444,811       406,335  
     Commitments and contingencies (Notes 13 and 18)
               
Stockholders' Equity
               
     Capital stock - authorized 80,000,000 shares $1 par; issued 32,245,226 shares
               
          (2012 - 31,589,366 shares)
    32,245       31,589  
     Paid-in capital
    481,011       437,364  
     Retained earnings
    686,114       623,035  
     Treasury stock - 14,660,427 shares (2012 - 13,057,270 shares), at cost
    (752,634 )     (640,732 )
     Deferred compensation payable in Company stock (Note 14)
    2,154       2,035  
                    Total Stockholders' Equity
    448,890       453,291  
                    Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity
  $ 893,701     $ 859,626  
                 
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
               
 
 
54

 
 
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
 
                   
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                 
(in thousands)
                 
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
                 
     Net income
  $ 77,227     $ 89,304     $ 85,979  
     Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
                       
          Depreciation and amortization
    32,388       30,521       29,499  
          Provision for uncollectible accounts receivable
    10,907       9,111       8,563  
          Stock option expense
    6,042       8,130       8,376  
          Amortization of discount on covertible notes
    8,674       8,106       7,576  
          Provision for deferred income taxes (Note 11)
    (6,988 )     (3,151 )     7,242  
          Noncash portion of long-term incentive compensation
    1,301       360       2,595  
          Amortization of debt issuance costs
    1,751       1,265       1,137  
          Changes in operating assets and liabilities, excluding amounts acquired in business combinations:
                       
                    Decrease/(increase) in accounts receivable
    (9,009 )     (24,421 )     26,896  
                    Decrease/(increase) in inventories
    355       1,610       (940 )
                    Increase in prepaid expenses
    (6,317 )     (38 )     (1,124 )
                    Increase/(decrease) in accounts payable and other current liabilities
    40,340       4,954       (1,397 )
                    Increase/(decrease) in income taxes
    (2,461 )     6,020       2,708  
                    Increase in other assets
    (6,507 )     (5,203 )     (4,009 )
                    Increase in other liabilities
    6,713       8,329       4,548  
         Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
    (3,982 )     (3,435 )     (3,854 )
          Other sources
    413       306       548  
               Net cash provided by operating activities
    150,847       131,768       174,343  
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
                       
     Capital expenditures
    (29,324 )     (35,252 )     (29,592 )
     Business combinations, net of cash acquired (Note 7)
    (2,257 )     (5,900 )     (3,664 )
     Other sources/(uses)
    235       468       (858 )
               Net cash used by investing activities
    (31,346 )     (40,684 )     (34,114 )
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
                       
     Purchases of treasury stock
    (92,911 )     (60,624 )     (143,970 )
     Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation
    (5,348 )     (4,098 )     (3,916 )
     Dividends paid
    (14,148 )     (13,026 )     (12,538 )
     Proceeds from exercise of stock options (Note 4)
    17,122       12,310       8,036  
    Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
    3,982       3,435       3,854  
     Debt issuance costs
    (1,108 )     -       (2,657 )
     Increase/(decrease) in cash overdraft payable
    (11,415 )     1,924       (826 )
     Other sources/(uses)
    (788 )     445       (48 )
               Net cash used by financing activities
    (104,614 )     (59,634 )     (152,065 )
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    14,887       31,450       (11,836 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    69,531       38,081       49,917  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
  $ 84,418     $ 69,531     $ 38,081  
                         
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
                       
 
 
55

 

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES
 
IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
 
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                                   
(in thousands, except per share data)
                         
Deferred
       
                           
Compensation
       
                     
Treasury
   
Payable in
       
   
Capital
   
Paid-in
   
Retained
   
Stock-
   
Company
       
   
Stock
   
Capital
   
Earnings
   
at Cost
   
Stock
   
Total
 
    Balance at December 31, 2010
  $ 30,382     $ 365,007     $ 473,316     $ (408,615 )   $ 1,959     $ 462,049  
Net income
    -       -       85,979       -       -       85,979  
Dividends paid ($.60 per share)
    -       -       (12,538 )     -       -       (12,538 )
Stock awards and exercise of stock options (Note 4)
    555       33,218       -       (11,576 )     -       22,197  
Purchases of treasury stock (Note 20)
    -       -       -       (143,970 )     -       (143,970 )
Other
    -       (131 )     -       70       28       (33 )
    Balance at December 31, 2011
    30,937       398,094       546,757       (564,091 )     1,987       413,684  
Net income
    -       -       89,304       -       -       89,304  
Dividends paid ($.68 per share)
    -       -       (13,026 )     -       -       (13,026 )
Stock awards and exercise of stock options (Note 4)
    652       38,893       -       (16,085 )     -       23,460  
Purchases of treasury stock (Note 20)
    -       -       -       (60,624 )     -       (60,624 )
Other
    -       377       -       68       48       493  
    Balance at December 31, 2012
    31,589       437,364       623,035       (640,732 )     2,035       453,291  
Net income
    -       -       77,227       -       -       77,227  
Dividends paid ($.76 per share)
    -       -       (14,148 )     -       -       (14,148 )
Stock awards and exercise of stock options (Note 4)
    656       44,366       -       (18,851 )     -       26,171  
Purchases of treasury stock (Note 20)
    -       -       -       (92,911 )     -       (92,911 )
Other
    -       (719 )     -       (140 )     119       (740 )
    Balance at December 31, 2013
  $ 32,245     $ 481,011     $ 686,114     $ (752,634 )   $ 2,154     $ 448,890  
                                                 
The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are integral parts of this statement.
 

 
56

 

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 
1.     Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
NATURE OF OPERATIONS
We operate through our two wholly-owned subsidiaries: VITAS Healthcare Corporation (“VITAS”) and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. (“Roto-Rooter”). VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps make terminally ill patients' final days as comfortable as possible. Through its team of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their families. Roto-Rooter provides plumbing and drain cleaning services to both residential and commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to over 90% of the U.S. population.

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Chemed Corporation and its wholly owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany transactions have been eliminated.

We have analyzed the provisions of the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) authoritative guidance on the consolidation of variable interest entities relative to our contractual relationships with Roto-Rooter’s independent contractors and franchisees.  The guidance requires the primary beneficiary of a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE”) to consolidate the accounts of the VIE.  Based upon the guidance provided by the FASB, we have concluded that neither the independent contractors nor the franchisees are VIEs.

CASH EQUIVALENTS
Cash equivalents comprise short-term, highly liquid investments, including money market funds that have original maturities of three months or less.

ACCOUNTS AND LOANS RECEIVABLE
Accounts and loans receivable are recorded at the principal balance outstanding less estimated allowances for uncollectible accounts.  For the Roto-Rooter segment, allowances for trade accounts receivable are generally provided for accounts more than 90 days past due, although collection efforts continue beyond that time.  Due to the small number of loans receivable outstanding, allowances for loan losses are determined on a case-by-case basis.  For the VITAS segment, allowances for accounts receivable are provided on accounts based on expected collection rates by payer types. The expected collection rate is based on both historical averages and known current trends.  Final write-off of overdue accounts or loans receivable is made when all reasonable collection efforts have been made and payment is not forthcoming.  We closely monitor our receivables and periodically review procedures for granting credit to attempt to hold losses to a minimum.

As of December 31, 2013, VITAS has approximately $114,000 in unbilled revenue included in accounts receivable (December 31, 2012 - $457,000).  The unbilled revenue at VITAS relates to hospice programs currently undergoing various patient file reviews.  Surveyors working on behalf of the U.S. Federal government review certain patient files for compliance with Medicare regulations.  During the time the patient file is under review, we are unable to bill for care provided to those patients.  We make appropriate provisions to reduce our accounts receivable balance for any governmental or other payer reviews resulting in denials of patient service revenue.  We believe our hospice programs comply with all payer requirements at the time of billing.  However, we cannot predict whether future billing reviews or similar audits by payers will result in material denials or reductions in revenue.

       CONCENTRATION OF RISK
As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, approximately 60% and 53%, respectively, of VITAS’ total accounts receivable balance were due from Medicare and 31% and 36%, respectively, of VITAS’ total accounts receivable balance were due from various state Medicaid programs.  Combined accounts receivable from Medicare and Medicaid represent 85% of the consolidated net accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013.

As further described in Note 19, we have agreements with one vendor to provide specified pharmacy services for VITAS and its hospice patients.  In 2013 and 2012, respectively, purchases made from this vendor represent over 90% of all pharmacy services used by VITAS.
 
 
57

 
 
INVENTORIES
Substantially all of the inventories are either general merchandise or finished goods.  Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market.  For determining the value of inventories, cost methods that reasonably approximate the first-in, first-out (“FIFO”) method are used.

DEPRECIATION AND PROPERTIES AND EQUIPMENT
Depreciation of properties and equipment is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  Leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of the remaining lease terms (excluding option terms) or their useful lives.  Expenditures for maintenance, repairs, renewals and betterments that do not materially prolong the useful lives of the assets are expensed as incurred. The cost of property retired or sold and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is reflected currently in other income, net.

Expenditures for major software purchases and software developed for internal use are capitalized and depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  For software developed for internal use, external direct costs for materials and services and certain internal payroll and related fringe benefit costs are capitalized in accordance with the FASB’s authoritative guidance on accounting for the costs of computer software developed or obtained for internal use.

The weighted average lives of our property and equipment at December 31, 2013, were:

Buildings and building improvements
    9.0
 yrs.
Transportation equipment
    13.9  
Machinery and equipment
    5.6  
Computer software
    5.1  
Furniture and fixtures
    4.7  

GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets arise from purchase business combinations and are amortized using either an accelerated method or the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The selection of an amortization method is based on which method best reflects the economic pattern of usage of the asset.  The weighted average lives of our identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets at December 31, 2013, were:

Covenants not to compete
    6.4
 yrs.
Reaquired franchise rights
    6.5  
Referral networks
    10.0  
Customer lists
    13.3  

The date of our annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis is October 1.  The VITAS trade name is considered to have an indefinite life.  We also capitalize the direct costs of obtaining licenses to operate either hospice programs or plumbing operations subject to a minimum capitalization threshold.  These costs are amortized over the life of the license using the straight line method.  Certificates of Need (CON), which are required in certain states for hospice operations, are generally granted without expiration and thus, we believe them to be indefinite-lived assets subject to impairment testing.

We consider that Roto-Rooter Corp. (RRC), Roto-Rooter Services Co. (RRSC) and VITAS are appropriate reporting units for testing goodwill impairment.  We consider RRC and RRSC separate reporting units but one operating segment.  This is appropriate as they each have their own set of general ledger accounts that can be analyzed at “one level below an operating segment” per the definition of a reporting unit in FASB guidance.

In July 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2012-02 – Intangibles Goodwill and Other which provided additional guidance related to the impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets.  ASU No. 2012–02 allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform further impairment testing.  The revised guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 but early adoption was permitted.  Our impairment testing date is October 1 of each year and we adopted the new guidelines in the third quarter of 2012.
 
 
58

 

We completed our qualitative analysis for impairment of goodwill and our indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2013.  Based on our assessment, we do not believe that it is more likely than not that our reporting units or indefinite-lived assets fair values are less than their carrying values.

LONG-LIVED ASSETS
If we believe a triggering event may have occurred that indicates a possible impairment of our long-lived assets, we perform an estimate and valuation of the future benefits of our long-lived assets (other than goodwill, the VITAS trade name and capitalized CON costs) based on key financial indicators. If the projected undiscounted cash flows of a major business unit indicate that property and equipment or identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets have been impaired, a write-down to fair value is made.

OTHER ASSETS
Debt issuance costs are included in other assets.  Issuance costs related to revolving credit agreements are amortized using the straight line method, over the life of the agreement.  All other issuance costs are amortized using the effective interest method over the life of the debt.

REVENUE RECOGNITION
Both the VITAS segment and Roto-Rooter segment recognize service revenues and sales when the earnings process has been completed.  Generally, this occurs when services are provided or products are delivered.  Sales of Roto-Rooter products, including drain cleaning machines and drain cleaning solution, comprise less than 3% of our total service revenues and sales for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.

CHARITY CARE
VITAS provides charity care, in certain circumstances, to patients without charge when management of the hospice program determines that the patient does not have the financial wherewithal to make payment.  There is no revenue or associated accounts receivable in the accompanying consolidated financial statements related to charity care.

The cost of providing charity care during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, was $7.5 million, $8.4 million and $7.3 million, respectively.  The cost of charity care is calculated by taking the ratio of charity care days to total days of care and multiplying by total cost of care.

SALES TAX
The Roto-Rooter segment collects sales tax from customers when required by state and federal laws.  We record the amount of sales tax collected net in the accompanying consolidated statement of income.

GUARANTEES
In the normal course of business, Roto-Rooter enters into various guarantees and indemnifications in our relationships with customers and others.  These arrangements include guarantees of services for periods ranging from one day to one year and product satisfaction guarantees.  Prior to 2012, our technicians were financially responsible for servicing guarantees and warranty claims.  During 2012, Roto-Rooter modified its technician compensation program and the Company began assuming financial responsibility for service guarantees and warranty claims.  At December 31, 2013 and 2012 our accrual for such claims was $321,000 and $361,000 respectively.

OPERATING EXPENSES
Cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation) includes salaries, wages and benefits of service providers and field personnel, material costs, medical supplies and equipment, pharmaceuticals, insurance costs, service vehicle costs and other expenses directly related to providing service revenues or generating sales.  Selling, general and administrative expenses include salaries, wages, stock option expense and benefits of selling, marketing and administrative employees, advertising expenses, communications and branch telephone expenses, office rent and operating costs, legal, banking and professional fees and other administrative costs.  The cost associated with VITAS sales personnel is included in cost of services provided and goods sold (excluding depreciation).

ADVERTISING
We expense the production costs of advertising the first time the advertising takes place.  The costs of telephone directory listings are expensed when the directories are placed in circulation.  These directories are generally in circulation for approximately one year, at which point they are typically replaced by the publisher with a new directory.  We generally pay for directory placement assuming it is in circulation for one year.  If the directory is in circulation for less than or greater than one year, we receive a credit or additional billing, as necessary.  We do not control the timing of when a new directory is placed in circulation.  Advertising expense for the year ended December 31, 2013, was $31.0 million (2012 – $29.2 million; 2011 - $27.2 million).
 
 
59

 

COMPUTATION OF EARNINGS PER SHARE
Earnings per share are computed using the weighted average number of shares of capital stock outstanding.  Diluted earnings per share reflect the dilutive impact of our outstanding stock options and nonvested stock awards.  Stock options whose exercise price is greater than the average market price of our stock are excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period on a straight-line basis.

INSURANCE ACCRUALS
For our Roto-Rooter segment and Corporate Office, we self-insure for all casualty insurance claims (workers’ compensation, auto liability and general liability).  As a result, we closely monitor and frequently evaluate our historical claims experience to estimate the appropriate level of accrual for self-insured claims.  Our third-party administrator (“TPA”) processes and reviews claims on a monthly basis.  Currently, our exposure on any single claim is capped at $750,000.  In developing our estimates, we accumulate historical claims data for the previous 10 years to calculate loss development factors (“LDF”) by insurance coverage type.  LDFs are applied to known claims to estimate the ultimate potential liability for known and unknown claims for each open policy year.  LDFs are updated annually.  Because this methodology relies heavily on historical claims data, the key risk is whether the historical claims are an accurate predictor of future claims exposure.  The risk also exists that certain claims have been incurred and not reported on a timely basis.  To mitigate these risks, in conjunction with our TPA, we closely monitor claims to ensure timely accumulation of data and compare claims trends with the industry experience of our TPA.

For the VITAS segment, we self-insure for workers’ compensation claims.  Currently, VITAS’ exposure on any single claim is capped at $1,000,000. For VITAS’ self-insurance accruals for workers’ compensation, the valuation methods used are similar to those used internally for our other business units.

Our casualty insurance liabilities are recorded gross before any estimated recovery for amounts exceeding our stop loss limits.  Estimated recoveries from insurance carriers are recorded as accounts receivable.

TAXES ON INCOME
Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.  Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amount of assets and liabilities and their tax basis.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in our opinion, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized due to insufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward period available under the tax laws. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in laws and rates on the date of enactment.

We are subject to income taxes in Canada, U.S. federal and most state jurisdictions.  Significant judgment is required to determine our provision for income taxes.  Our financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of such uncertain positions assuming the taxing authorities’ full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.

CONTINGENCIES
As discussed in Note 18, we are subject to various lawsuits and claims in the normal course of our business.  In addition, we periodically receive communications from governmental and regulatory agencies concerning compliance with Medicare and Medicaid billing requirements at our VITAS subsidiary.  We establish reserves for specific, uninsured liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal action that we deem to be probable and estimable.  We record legal fees associated with legal and regulatory actions as the costs are incurred.  We disclose material loss contingencies that are probable but not reasonably estimable and those that are at least reasonably possible.

ESTIMATES
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Disclosures of aftertax expenses and adjustments are based on estimates of the effective income tax rates for the applicable segments.
 
 
60

 
 
2.     Hospice Revenue Recognition
VITAS recognizes revenue at the estimated realizable amount due from third-party payers, which are primarily Medicare and Medicaid.  Payers may deny payment for services in whole or in part on the basis that such services are not eligible for coverage and do not qualify for reimbursement.  We estimate denials each period and make adequate provision in the financial statements.  The estimate of denials is based on historical trends and known circumstances and does not vary materially from period to period on an aggregate basis.  Medicare billings are subject to certain limitations, as described below.

The allowance for doubtful accounts for VITAS comprises the following (in thousands):

   
Medicare
   
Medicaid
   
Commercial
   
Other
   
Total
 
Beginning Balance January 1, 2011
  $ 4,917     $ 3,097     $ 1,569     $ 420     $ 10,003  
Bad debt provision
    1,393       4,794       2,034       (12 )     8,209  
Write-offs
    (2,496 )     (3,787 )     (2,956 )     (760 )     (9,999 )
Other/Contractual adjustments
    397       130       542       205       1,274  
Ending Balance December 31, 2012
    4,211       4,234       1,189       (147 )     9,487  
Bad debt provision
    506       5,169       3,084       591       9,350  
Write-offs
    (1,304 )     (4,361 )     (2,691 )     (534 )     (8,890 )
Other/Contractual adjustments
    462       152       622       112       1,348  
Ending Balance December 31, 2013
  $ 3,875     $ 5,194     $ 2,204     $ 22     $ 11,295  

VITAS is subject to certain limitations on Medicare payments for services.  Specifically, if the number of inpatient care days any hospice program provides to Medicare beneficiaries exceeds 20% of the total days of hospice care such program provided to all Medicare patients for an annual period beginning September 28, the days in excess of the 20% figure may be reimbursed only at the routine homecare rate.  None of VITAS’ hospice programs exceeded the payment limits on inpatient services in 2013, 2012 or 2011.

VITAS is also subject to a Medicare annual per-beneficiary cap (“Medicare cap”).  Compliance with the Medicare cap is measured in one of two ways based on a provider election.  The “streamlined” method compares total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by that Medicare provider number between November 1 of each year and October 31 of the following year with the product of the per-beneficiary cap amount and the number of Medicare beneficiaries electing hospice care for the first time from that hospice program or programs from September 28 through September 27 of the following year.

The “proportional” method compares the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by the Medicare provider number between September 28 and September 27 of the following year with the product of the per beneficiary cap amount and a pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving hospice services from that program during the same period.  The pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries is calculated based on the ratio of days the beneficiary received hospice services during the measurement period to the the total number of days the beneficiary received hospice services.

We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific admission, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether revenues are likely to exceed the annual per-beneficiary Medicare cap.  Should we determine that revenues for a program are likely to exceed the Medicare cap based on projected trends, we attempt to institute corrective actions, which include changes to the patient mix and increased patient admissions.  However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare cap, we estimate the amount of revenue recognized during the period that will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare cap and record the amount as a reduction to service revenue.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we reversed the Medicare cap liability for amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 for three programs’ projected 2013 measurement period liability. During 2013 this reversal was offset by the Medicare cap liability for two programs’ projected 2014 measurement period liability.   For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded pretax charges in continuing operations for the estimated Medicare cap liability for three programs’ projected liability through year end for the 2013 measurement period.  This amount was subsequently reversed during the 2013 fiscal year due to increased admission.  The net pretax expense/(income) was $7.0 million, ($1.7 million), and $1.6 million for fiscal years 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
 
 
61

 
 
Shown below is the Medicare cap liability activity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 in thousands):

   
2013
   
2012
 
Beginning Balance January 1,
  $ 1,261     $ 2,965  
2014 measurement period
    3,881       -  
2013 measurement period
    3,181       874  
2012 measurement period
    -       (2,578 )
2010 measurement period
    (63 )     -  
Ending Balance December 31,
  $ 8,260     $ 1,261  
 
3.     Long-Term Debt and Lines of Credit
As of December 31, 2013, we have long-term debt of $183.6 million (December 31, 2012 - $174.9 million).  This long-term debt is related in its entirety to our Convertible Notes that are due in full in May 2014.

2013 REFINANCING
On January 18, 2013, we replaced our existing credit agreement with a new Revolving Credit Facility (“2013 Credit Agreement”).  Terms of the 2013 Credit Agreement consist of a five-year, $350 million revolving credit facility.  This 2013 Credit Agreement also included a $150 million expansion feature.  The interest rate on the 2013 Credit Agreement is currently LIBOR plus 125 basis points. Debt issuance costs associated with the existing credit agreement were not material.  With respect to the 2013 Credit Agreement, deferred financing costs are immaterial.
 
CONVERTIBLE NOTES
In May 2007, we issued $200 million of Senior Convertible Notes due 2014 (the “Notes”) at a price of $1,000 per Note, less an underwriting fee of $27.50 per Note.  We received approximately $194 million in net proceeds from the sale of the Notes after paying underwriting fees, legal and other expenses.  We pay interest on the Notes on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning on November 15, 2007. The Notes mature on May 15, 2014. The Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each of our subsidiaries that are a borrower or a guarantor under any senior credit facility, as defined in the Indenture.  The Notes were convertible, under certain circumstances, into our Capital Stock at an initial conversion rate of 12.3874 shares per $1,000 principal amount of Notes.  This conversion rate is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $80.73 per share. Prior to March 1, 2014, holders may convert their Notes under certain circumstances. On and after March 1, 2014, the Notes will be convertible at any time prior to the close of business three days prior to the stated maturity date of the Notes. Upon conversion of a Note, if the conversion value is $1,000 or less, holders will receive cash equal to the lesser of $1,000 or the conversion value of the number of shares of our Capital Stock. If the conversion value exceeds $1,000, in addition to this, holders will receive shares of our Capital Stock for the excess amount.  The Indenture contains customary terms and covenants that upon certain events of default, including without limitation, failure to pay when due any principal amount, a fundamental change or certain cross defaults in other agreements or instruments, occurring and continuing; either the trustee or the holders of 25% in aggregate principal amount of the Notes may declare the principal of the Notes and any accrued and unpaid interest through the date of such declaration immediately due and payable. In the case of certain events of bankruptcy or insolvency relating to any significant subsidiary or to us, the principal amount of the Notes and accrued interest automatically becomes due and payable.

The conversion rate on the Notes is adjusted upon certain corporate events including a quarterly dividend payment in excess of $0.06 per share.  We have increased the dividend per share periodically since issuing the Notes.  This has the effect of changing the conversion rate to 12.7411 ($78.49 per share) at December 31, 2013.

Pursuant to the FASB’s guidance on accounting for derivative instruments indexed to, and potentially settled in a company’s own stock as well as the guidance on the meaning of “indexed to a company’s own stock,” the Notes are accounted for as convertible debt in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet and the embedded options within the Notes have not been accounted for as separate derivatives.  FASB’s guidance requires all such convertible debentures to be separately accounted for as debt and equity pieces of the instrument.  At inception of the convertible instrument, cash flows related to the convertible instrument are to be discounted using a market rate of interest.

 
62

 

The following amounts are included in our consolidated balance sheet related to the Notes (in thousands):

   
December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Principal amount of convertible debentures
  $ 186,956     $ 186,956  
Unamortized debt discount
    (3,392 )     (12,066 )
Carrying amount of convertible debentures
  $ 183,564     $ 174,890  
Additional paid in capital (net of tax)
  $ 31,310     $ 31,310  

In conjunction with the Notes, we entered into a purchased call transaction (written call) and a sold warrant transaction (sold warrant) with JPMorgan Chase, National Association and Citibank, N.A. (the "Counterparties").  The purchased call options cover approximately 2,477,000 shares of our Capital Stock, which under most circumstances represents the maximum number of shares of Capital Stock that underlie the Notes.  Concurrently with entering into the purchased call options, we entered into warrant transactions with each of the Counterparties. Pursuant to the warrant transactions, we sold to the Counterparties warrants to purchase in the aggregate approximately 2,477,000 shares of our Capital Stock. In most cases, the sold warrants may not be exercised prior to the maturity of the Notes.

The purchased call options and sold warrants are separate contracts with the Counterparties, are not part of the terms of the Notes and do not affect the rights of holders under the Notes. A holder of the Notes will not have any rights with respect to the purchased call options or the sold warrants.  The purchased call options are expected to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Notes if the market value per share of the Capital Stock at the time of exercise is greater than the conversion price of the Notes at time of exercise. The sold warrants have an exercise price of $105.44 and are expected to result in some dilution should the price of our Capital Stock exceed this exercise price.

Our net cost for these transactions was approximately $27.3 million.  Pursuant to FASB’s authoritative guidance, the purchased call option and the sold warrants are accounted for as equity transactions.  Therefore, our net cost was recorded as a decrease in stockholders’ equity in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.
 
The following amounts comprise interest expense included in our consolidated income statement (in thousands):

   
December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Cash interest expense
  $ 4,610     $ 5,352     $ 5,175  
Non-cash amortization of debt discount
    8,674       8,106       7,576  
Amortization of debt costs
    1,751       1,265       1,137  
Total interest expense
  $ 15,035     $ 14,723     $ 13,888  
 
The unamortized debt discount is amortized using the effective interest method over the remaining life of the Notes.  The effective rate on the Notes after adoption of the standard is 6.875%. The average interest rate for our long-term debt was 1.9% for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

Capitalized interest was not material for any of the periods shown.  Summarized below are the total amounts of interest paid during the years ended December 31 (in thousands):

2013
  $ 4,744  
2012
    5,547  
2011
    4,754  

 
63

 
 
DEBT COVENANTS
Collectively, the 2013 Credit Agreement and the Notes require us to meet certain restrictive non-financial and financial covenants. We are in compliance with all non-financial debt covenants as of December 31, 2013.  The restrictive financial covenants are defined in the 2013 Credit Agreement and include maximum leverage ratios, minimum fixed charge coverage and limits on operating leases.  We are in compliance with the financial debt covenants as of December 31, 2013, as follows:

Description
 
Requirement
 
Chemed
         
Leverage Ratio (Consolidated Indebtedness/Consolidated  Adj.
       
EBITDA)
 
< 3.50 to 1.00
 
1.07 to 1.00
         
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Consolidated Free Cash
       
Flow/Consolidated Fixed Charges
 
> 1.50 to 1.00
 
2.25 to 1.00
         
Annual Operating Lease Commitment
 
< $30.0 million
 
$26.5 million
 
We have issued $35.0 million in standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2013, mainly for insurance purposes.  Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the revolving credit agreement.  As of December 31, 2013, we have approximately $315.0 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility, excluding the expansion feature.
 
4.     Stock-Based Compensation Plans
We have four stock incentive plans under which 6.7 million shares can be issued to key employees and directors through a grant of stock options, stock awards and/or performance stock units (“PSUs”).  The Compensation/Incentive Committee (“CIC”) of the Board of Directors administers these plans.
 
We grant stock options, stock awards and PSUs to our officers, other key employees and directors to better align their long-term interests with those of our shareholders.  We grant stock options at an exercise price equal to the market price of our stock on the date of grant.  Options generally vest evenly annually over a three-year period and have a contractual life of 10 years.  Restricted stock awards generally cliff vest over a three- or four-year period.  Unrestricted stock awards generally are granted to our non-employee directors annually at the time of our annual meeting.  PSUs are contingent upon achievement of multi-year earnings targets or market targets.  Upon achievement of targets, PSUs are converted to unrestricted shares of capital stock.
 
We recognize the cost of stock options, stock awards and PSUs on a straight-line basis over the service life of the award, generally the vesting period.  We include the cost of restricted stock awards in amortization expense and the cost of all other stock-based compensation in selling, general and administrative expense.

In January and February 2013, the CIC granted 29,992 restricted stock awards to certain key employees.  These shares cliff vest in January 2016 or February 2017.  In May 2013, the CIC granted 7,032 unrestricted shares of stock to the Company’s outside directors.

PERFORMANCE AWARDS
In November 2013, the CIC granted 16,149 PSUs contingent upon the achievement of certain total shareholder return (“TSR”) targets as compared to the TSR of a group of peer companies for the three-year period ending December 31, 2015, the date at which such awards may vest.  The Company utilized a Monte Carlo simulation approach in a risk-neutral framework with inputs including historical volatility of 30.4% and the risk-free interest rate of 0.36%.  The cumulative compensation cost of the TSR-based PSUs award to be recorded over the three year vesting period is $1.2 million.
 
In November 2013, the CIC also granted 16,149 PSUs contingent upon the achievement of certain earnings per share (“EPS”) targets.  At end of each reporting period, the Company estimates the number of shares that it believes will ultimately be earned and records that expense over the service period of the award.  We currently estimate cumulative compensation cost of the EPS-based PSUs to be recorded over the three year vesting period is $850,000.

The EBITDA and market-price PSUs granted in November 2012 expired without any shares being issued as the targets were not achieved.
 
 
64

 
 
EMPLOYEE STOCK PURCHASE PLAN (“ESPP”)
The ESPP allows eligible participants to purchase our shares through payroll deductions at current market value.  We pay administrative and broker fees associated with the ESPP.  Shares purchased for the ESPP are purchased on the open market and credited directly to participants’ accounts.  In accordance with the FASB’s guidance, the ESPP is non-compensatory.

The following table summarizes total stock option and stock award activity during 2013:

   
Stock Options
   
Stock Awards and PSUs
 
         
Weighted Average
   
Aggregate
         
Weighted
 
               
Remaining
   
Intrinsic
         
Average
 
   
Number of
   
Exercise
   
Contractual
   
Value
   
Number of
   
Grant-Date
 
   
Options
   
Price
   
Life (Years)
   
(thousands)
   
Shares
   
Price
 
Outstanding at January 1, 2013
    2,461,455     $ 57.41                   269,292     $ 50.34  
Granted
    329,274       70.30                   69,322       74.60  
Exercised/Vested
    (619,248 )     49.46                   (56,644 )     47.18  
Canceled/ Forfeited
    (4,069 )     64.04                   (412 )     65.17  
Outstanding at December 31, 2013
    2,167,412       61.63       6.4     $ 33,308       281,558       56.93  
                                                 
Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2013
    2,167,412       61.63       6.4       33,308       277,524       56.74  
Exercisable at December 31, 2013
    1,377,534       58.76       5.2       25,123    
n.a.
   
n.a.
 

We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model.  We determine expected term, volatility, dividend yield and forfeiture rate based on our historical experience.  We believe that historical experience is the best indicator of these factors.

Comparative data for stock option and stock award activity include (in thousands, except per-share amounts):

   
Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Total compensation cost of stock-based compensation
                 
   plans charged against income
  $ 10,868     $ 11,975     $ 14,237  
Total income tax benefit recognized in income for stock
                       
   based compensation plans
    3,994       4,401       5,232  
Total intrinsic value of stock options exercised
    16,922       15,671       12,925  
Total intrinsic value of stock awards vested during the period
    4,298       2,786       3,757  
Per-share weighted averaged grant-date fair value of
                       
   stock awards granted
    74.60       41.49       64.74  

The assumptions we used to value stock option grants are as follows:

   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
                   
Stock price on date of issuance
  $ 70.30     $ 63.36     $ 65.17  
Grant date fair value per share
  $ 14.79     $ 15.98     $ 19.08  
Number of options granted
    329,274       442,350       513,100  
Expected term (years)
    4.9       4.9       4.9  
Risk free rate of return
    1.39 %     0.89 %     2.35 %
Volatility
    24.90 %     30.80 %     32.80 %
Dividend yield
    1.1 %     1.0 %     1.0 %
Forfeiture rate
    -       -       -  
 
 
65

 
 
Other data for stock options and stock awards for 2013 include (dollar amounts in thousands):

   
Stock
   
Stock Awards
 
   
Options
   
and PSUs
 
Total unrecognized compensation related to nonvested options and awards at end of year
  $ 7,459     $ 6,465  
Weighted average period over which unrecognized compensation cost of nonvested options
               
   and awards to be recognized (years)
    2.2       2.1  
Actual income tax benefit realized from options exercised during the year
  $ 6,251    
n.a.
 
Aggregate intrinsic value of stock awards and PSUs vested and expected to vest
 
n.a.
      21,369  
 
5.     Segments and Nature of the Business
Our segments include the VITAS segment and the Roto-Rooter segment.  Relative contributions of each segment to service revenues and sales were 74% and 26%, respectively, in 2013 and 75% and 25%, respectively, in 2012.  The vast majority of our service revenues and sales from continuing operations are generated from business within the United States.

The reportable segments have been defined along service lines, which is consistent with the way the businesses are managed. In determining reportable segments, the RRSC and RRC operating units of the Roto-Rooter segment have been aggregated on the basis of possessing similar operating and economic characteristics.  The characteristics of these operating segments and the basis for aggregation are reviewed annually.  Accordingly, the reportable segments are defined as follows:

  
The VITAS segment provides hospice services for patients with terminal illnesses.  This type of care is aimed at making the terminally ill patient’s end of life as comfortable and pain-free as possible.  Hospice care is typically available to patients who have been initially certified or re-certified as terminally ill (i.e., a prognosis of six months or less) by their attending physician, if any, and the hospice physician.  VITAS offers all levels of hospice care in a given market, including routine home care, inpatient care and continuous care.  Over 90% of VITAS’ revenues are derived through the Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement programs.

●   
The Roto-Rooter segment provides repair and maintenance services to residential and commercial accounts using the Roto-Rooter registered service marks. Such services include plumbing and sewer, drain and pipe cleaning. They are delivered through company-owned and operated territories, independent contractor-operated territories and franchised locations. This segment also manufactures and sells products and equipment used to provide such services.

  
We report corporate administrative expenses and unallocated investing and financing income and expense not directly related to either segment as “Corporate”.  Corporate administrative expense includes the stewardship, accounting and reporting, legal, tax and other costs of operating a publicly held corporation.  Corporate investing and financing income and expenses include the costs and income associated with corporate debt and investment arrangements.
 
 
66

 

Segment data are set forth below (in thousands):

   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Revenues by Type of Service
       
 
       
VITAS
                 
  Routine homecare
  $ 791,735     $ 778,776     $ 718,658  
  Continuous care
    155,409       172,063       158,466  
  General inpatient
    104,968       114,494       110,742  
  Medicare cap
    (6,999 )     1,704       (1,594 )
Total segment
    1,045,113       1,067,037       986,272  
Roto-Rooter
                       
  Sewer and drain cleaning
    141,283       138,500       138,932  
  Plumbing repair and maintenance
    172,002       172,310       177,363  
  Independent contractors
    33,030       28,522       26,711  
  HVAC repair and maintenance
    -       1,109       3,410  
  Other products and services
    21,901       22,565       23,282  
Total segment
    368,216       363,006       369,698  
Total service revenues and sales
  $ 1,413,329     $ 1,430,043     $ 1,355,970  
Aftertax Segment Earnings/(Loss)
                       
VITAS
  $ 76,144     $ 86,577     $ 80,358  
Roto-Rooter
    29,243       30,905       34,879  
Total
    105,387       117,482       115,237  
Corporate
    (28,160 )     (28,178 )     (29,258 )
Net income
  $ 77,227     $ 89,304     $ 85,979  
Interest Income
                       
VITAS
  $ 5,038     $ 3,883     $ 4,293  
Roto-Rooter
    2,096       1,647       2,176  
Total
    7,134       5,530       6,469  
Corporate
    56       76       91  
Intercompany eliminations
    (6,343 )     (4,797 )     (6,134 )
Total interest income
  $ 847     $ 809     $ 426  
Interest Expense
                       
VITAS
  $ 182     $ 233     $ 229  
Roto-Rooter
    322       433       358  
Total
    504       666       587  
Corporate
    14,531       14,057       13,301  
Total interest expense
  $ 15,035     $ 14,723     $ 13,888  
Income Tax Provision
                       
VITAS
  $ 46,910     $ 53,092     $ 48,835  
Roto-Rooter
    17,560       18,770       21,353  
Total
    64,470       71,862       70,188  
Corporate
    (17,868 )     (15,347 )     (15,611 )
Total income tax provision
  $ 46,602     $ 56,515     $ 54,577  
Identifiable Assets
                       
VITAS
  $ 518,316     $ 519,555     $ 504,677  
Roto-Rooter
    241,679       224,735       212,234  
Total
    759,995       744,290       716,911  
Corporate
    133,706       115,336       78,994  
Total identifiable assets
  $ 893,701     $ 859,626     $ 795,905  
Additions to Long-Lived Assets
                       
VITAS
  $ 16,219     $ 24,735     $ 24,298  
Roto-Rooter
    15,202       16,132       9,426  
Total
    31,421       40,867       33,724  
Corporate
    160       285       72  
Total additions to long-lived assets
  $ 31,581     $ 41,152     $ 33,796  

 
67

 
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Depreciation and Amortization
                 
VITAS
  $ 20,251     $ 19,043     $ 18,480  
Roto-Rooter
    9,621       9,029       8,729  
Total
    29,872       28,072       27,209  
Corporate
    2,516       2,449       2,290  
Total depreciation and amortization
  $ 32,388     $ 30,521     $ 29,499  
 
6.     Intangible Assets
Amortization of definite-lived intangible asset for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011 was $1.6 million, $1.5 million and $1.5 million, respectively.  The following is a schedule by year of projected amortization expense for definite-lived intangible assets (in thousands):

2014
  $ 709  
2015
    479  
2016
    408  
2017
    256  
2018
    174  
Thereafter
    377  

The balance in identifiable intangible assets comprises the following (in thousands):

   
Gross
   
Accumulated
   
Net Book
 
   
Asset
   
Amortization
   
Value
 
December 31, 2013
                 
Referral networks
  $ 22,599     $ (21,219 )   $ 1,380  
Covenants not to compete
    9,570       (9,096 )     474  
Customer lists
    1,222       (1,170 )     52  
Reaquired franchise rights
    1,065       (570 )     495  
    Subtotal - definite-lived intangibles
    34,456       (32,055 )     2,401  
VITAS trade name
    51,300       -       51,300  
Rapid Rooter trade name
    150       -       150  
Operating licenses
    2,705       -       2,705  
     Total
  $ 88,611     $ (32,055 )   $ 56,556  
                         
December 31, 2012
                       
Referral networks
  $ 21,729     $ (19,884 )   $ 1,845  
Covenants not to compete
    9,446       (8,974 )     472  
Customer lists
    1,224       (1,146 )     78  
Reaquired franchise rights
    1,037       (410 )     627  
    Subtotal - definite-lived intangibles
    33,436       (30,414 )     3,022  
VITAS trade name
    51,300       -       51,300  
Rapid Rooter trade name
    150       -       150  
Operating licenses
    2,705       -       2,705  
     Total
  $ 87,591     $ (30,414 )   $ 57,177  

 
68

 

7.     Business Combinations
During 2013, we completed one business combination within the Roto-Rooter segment for $756,000 in cash to increase our market penetration in Pueblo, Colorado.  We made one acquisition within the VITAS segment for $1.5 million in cash to increase our market penetration in Houston, Texas during 2013.  The purchase price of these acquisitions was allocated as follows (in thousands):

Identifiable intangible assets
  $ 1,023  
Goodwill
    1,212  
Other assets and liabilities - net
    22  
    $ 2,257  

During 2012, we completed four business combinations within the Roto-Rooter segment for $5.9 million in cash to increase our market penetration in Bend, Oregon, Boise, Idaho, Shreveport, Louisiana and Ft. Lauderdale, Florida.  We made no acquisitions with the VITAS segment during 2012.  The purchase price of these acquisitions was allocated as follows (in thousands):

Identifiable intangible assets
  $ 373  
Goodwill
    5,094  
Other assets and liabilities - net
    433  
    $ 5,900  

On April 29, 2011, our VITAS segment completed an acquisition of the operating assets of Family Comfort Hospice which is based in Alabama.  This acquisition adds three central Alabama locations serving ten counties to VITAS’ network of hospice programs.  We made no acquisitions within the Roto-Rooter segment during 2011.  The purchase price of this acquisition is allocated as follows (in thousands):

Working capital
  $ 382  
Identifiable intangible assets
    951  
Goodwill
    2,320  
Other assets and liabilities - net
    11  
    $ 3,664  

The unaudited pro forma results of operations, assuming purchase business combinations completed in 2013 and 2012 were completed on January 1, 2012, do not materially impact the accompanying consolidated financial statements.  The results of operations of each of the above business combinations are included in our results of operations from the date of the respective acquisition.

8.     Discontinued Operations
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the accrual for our estimated liability for potential environmental cleanup and related costs arising from the 1991 sale of DuBois amounted to $1.7 million.  Of the 2013 balance, $826,000 is included in other current liabilities and $901,000 is included in other liabilities (long-term).   The estimated timing of payments of these liabilities follows (in thousands):

2014
  $ 826  
2015
    300  
Thereafter
    601  
    $ 1,727  

We are contingently liable for additional DuBois-related environmental cleanup and related costs up to a maximum of $14.9 million.  On the basis of a continuing evaluation of the potential liability, we believe it is not probable this additional liability will be paid.  Accordingly, no provision for this contingent liability has been recorded.  The potential liability is not insured, and the recorded liability does not assume the recovery of insurance proceeds.  Also, the environmental liability has not been discounted because it is not possible to reliably project the timing of payments.  We believe that any adjustments to our recorded liability will not materially adversely affect our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
 
 
69

 

9.     Cash Overdrafts and Cash Equivalents
Included in accounts payable are cash overdrafts of $806,000 and $12.2 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

From time to time throughout the year, we invest excess cash in money market funds or repurchase agreements directly with major commercial banks. We do not physically hold the collateral for repurchase agreements, but the term is less than 10 days.  We closely monitor the creditworthiness of the institutions with which we invest our overnight funds and the quality of the collateral underlying those investments. We had $23.1 million in cash equivalents as of December 31, 2013.  There was $56.6 million in cash equivalents as of December 31, 2012.  The weighted average rate of return for our cash equivalents was 0.08% in 2013 and 0.2% in 2012.

10.   Other Income—Net
Other income—net from continuing operations comprises the following (in thousands):

   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Market value gains related to deferred
                 
compensation trusts
  $ 4,982     $ 3,499     $ 799  
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    (320 )     (347 )     (441 )
Interest income
    847       809       426  
Other - net
    (39 )     162       (67 )
Total other income
  $ 5,470     $ 4,123     $ 717  

The offset for market value gains or losses of the deferred compensation trust are recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses.

11.   Income Taxes
The provision for income taxes comprises the following (in thousands):

   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Current
                 
U.S. federal
  $ 45,348     $ 51,467     $ 40,762  
U.S. state and local
    7,731       7,813       5,961  
Foreign
    511       386       612  
Deferred
                       
U.S. federal, state and local
    (6,995 )     (3,271 )     7,227  
Foreign
    7       120       15  
Total
  $ 46,602     $ 56,515     $ 54,577  

 
70

 
 
A summary of the temporary differences that give rise to deferred tax assets/ (liabilities) follows (in thousands):
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Accrued liabilities
  $ 41,434     $ 32,772  
Stock compensation expense
    14,866       15,190  
Allowance for uncollectible accounts receivable
    1,396       1,510  
State net operating loss carryforwards
    1,495       1,461  
Other
    800       678  
Deferred income tax assets
    59,991       51,611  
Amortization of intangible assets
    (45,941 )     (44,201 )
Accelerated tax depreciation
    (15,379 )     (16,536 )
Market valuation of investments
    (2,279 )     (1,569 )
Currents assets
    (1,459 )     (1,600 )
Other
    (1,949 )     (1,671 )
Deferred income tax liabilities
    (67,007 )     (65,577 )
 Net deferred income tax liabilities
  $ (7,016 )   $ (13,966 )
 
At December 31, 2013 and 2012, state net operating loss carryforwards were $29.4 million and $28.4 million, respectively.  These net operating losses will expire, in varying amounts, between 2014 and 2033.  Based on our history of operating earnings, we have determined that our operating income will, more likely than not, be sufficient to ensure realization of our deferred income tax assets.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending of year amount of our unrecognized tax benefit is as follows (in thousands):

   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Balance at January 1,
  $ 2,646     $ 2,612     $ 704  
Unrecognized tax benefits due to positions taken in current year
    219       219       2,038  
Decrease due to expiration of statute of limitations
    (1,973 )     (185 )     (130 )
Balance at December 31,
  $ 892     $ 2,646     $ 2,612  

We file tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states.  The years ended December 31, 2010 and forward remain open for review for federal income tax purposes.  The earliest open year relating to any of our major state jurisdictions is the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.  During the next twelve months, we do not anticipate a material net change in unrecognized tax benefits.

We classify interest related to our accrual for uncertain tax positions in separate interest accounts.  As of December 31, 2013 and 2012, we have approximately $116,000 and $306,000, respectively, accrued in interest payable related to uncertain tax positions.  These accruals are included in other current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet.  Net interest expense related to uncertain tax positions included in interest expense in the accompanying consolidated statement of income is not material.

The difference between the actual income tax provision for continuing operations and the income tax provision calculated at the statutory U.S. federal tax rate is explained as follows (in thousands):
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
                   
Income tax provision calculated using  the statutory rate of 35%
  $ 43,340     $ 51,037     $ 49,195  
State and local income taxes, less federal income tax effect
    4,323       4,601       4,733  
Uncertain tax position adjustments
    (1,782 )     -       -  
Nondeductible expenses
    1,250       1,137       1,062  
Other --net
    (529 )     (260 )     (413 )
Income tax provision
  $ 46,602     $ 56,515     $ 54,577  
Effective tax rate
    37.6 %     38.8 %     38.8 %

 
71

 
 
Summarized below are the total amounts of income taxes paid during the years ended December 31 (in thousands):
 
2013
  $ 55,827  
2012
    53,436  
2011
    44,343  

Provision has not been made for additional taxes on $35.1 million of undistributed earnings of our domestic subsidiaries.  Should we elect to sell our interest in all of these businesses rather than to effect a tax-free liquidation, additional taxes amounting to approximately $12.9 million would be incurred based on current income tax rates.

12.   Properties and Equipment
A summary of properties and equipment follows (in thousands):
 
   
December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
 
Land
  $ 1,392     $ 1,363  
Buildings
    52,328       47,831  
Transportation equipment
    20,381       20,165  
Machinery and equipment
    71,121       69,299  
Computer software
    49,110       47,184  
Furniture and fixtures
    71,167       68,394  
Projects under development
    8,006       2,305  
Total properties and equipment
    273,505       256,541  
Less accumulated depreciation
    (180,550 )     (164,607 )
Net properties and equipment
  $ 92,955     $ 91,934  

The net book value of computer software at December 31, 2013 and 2012, was $12.2 million and $14.1 million, respectively.  Depreciation expense for computer software was $3.9 million, $4.3 million and $5.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively.
 
13.   Lease Arrangements
We have operating leases that cover our corporate office headquarters, various warehouse and office facilities, office equipment and transportation equipment. The remaining terms of these leases range from monthly to nine years, and in most cases we expect that these leases will be renewed or replaced by other leases in the normal course of business. We have no significant capital leases as of December 31, 2013 or 2012.
 
The following is a summary of future minimum rental payments and sublease rentals to be received under operating leases that have initial or remaining noncancelable terms in excess of one year at December 31, 2013 (in thousands):
 
2014
  $ 23,108  
2015
    17,835  
2016
    13,488  
2017
    8,277  
2018
    4,713  
Thereafter
    4,405  
Total minimum rental payments
  $ 71,826  

Total rental expense incurred under operating leases for continuing operations follows (in thousands):
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Total rental payments
  $ 38,992     $ 39,997     $ 38,474  
Less sublease rentals
    -       (103 )     (170 )
Net rental expense
  $ 38,992     $ 39,894     $ 38,304  

 
72

 
 
The amounts shown above as Total rental payments and Net rental expense for 2012 and 2011 increased $16.0 million and $16.3 million, respectively from the prior year presentation due to certain in-patient unit leases being inadvertently omitted.  The omission did not affect our results of operations, financial position or cash flows.  All years are presented consistently.
 
14.  Retirement Plans
Retirement obligations under various plans cover substantially all full-time employees who meet age and/or service eligibility requirements. The major plans providing retirement benefits to our employees are defined contribution plans.  Expenses for our retirement and profit-sharing plans, excess benefit plans and other similar plans are as follows (in thousands):

For the Years Ended December 31,
 
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
               
$ 14,511     $ 11,376     $ 9,408  

These expenses include the impact of market gains and losses on assets held in deferred compensation plans.
 
We have excess benefit plans for key employees whose participation in the qualified plans is limited by U.S. Employee Retirement Income Security Act requirements. Benefits are determined based on theoretical participation in the qualified plans.  Benefits are only invested in mutual funds, and participants are not permitted to diversify accumulated benefits in shares of our stock. Trust assets invested in shares of our stock are included in treasury stock, and the corresponding liability is included in a separate component of stockholders’ equity. At December 31, 2013, these trusts held 97,801 shares or $2.2 million of our stock (2012 – 96,148 shares or $2.1 million).
 
15.  Earnings Per Share
The computation of earnings per share follows (in thousands, except per share data):

For the Years Ended December 31,
 
Net Income
 
Shares
 
Earnings per Share
 
2013                  
Earnings
 
$
 77,227 
 
 18,199 
 
$
 4.24 
 
Dilutive stock options
   
 -
 
 278 
       
Nonvested stock awards
   
 -
 
 108 
       
Diluted earnings
 
$
 77,227 
 
 18,585 
 
$
 4.16 
 
                   
2012                   
Earnings
 
$
 89,304 
 
 18,924 
 
$
 4.72 
 
Dilutive stock options
   
 -
 
 316 
       
Nonvested stock awards
   
 -
 
 99 
       
Diluted earnings
 
$
 89,304 
 
 19,339 
 
$
 4.62 
 
                   
2011                   
Earnings
 
$
 85,979 
 
 20,523 
 
$
 4.19 
 
Dilutive stock options
   
 -
 
 335 
       
Nonvested stock awards
   
 -
 
 87 
       
Diluted earnings
 
$
 85,979 
 
 20,945 
 
$
 4.10 
 
 
During 2013, 358,000 stock options were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share as their exercise prices were greater than the average market price during most of the year.  During 2012, 1.4 million stock options were also excluded.  During 2011, 1.3 million stock options were also excluded.
 
Diluted earnings per share may be impacted in future periods as the result of the issuance of our $200 million Notes and related purchased call options and sold warrants.  Per FASB’s authoritative guidance on the effect of contingently convertible instruments on diluted earnings per share and convertible bonds with issuer option to settle for cash upon conversion, we will not include any shares related to the Notes in our calculation of diluted earnings per share until our average stock price for a quarter exceeds the current conversion price.  We would then include in our diluted earnings per share calculation those shares issuable using the treasury stock method.  The amount of shares issuable is based upon the amount by which the average stock price for the quarter exceeds the conversion price.  The purchased call option does not impact the calculation of diluted earnings per share, as it is always anti-dilutive. The sold warrants become dilutive when our average stock price for a quarter exceeds the strike price of the warrant.

 
73

 
 
The following table provides examples of how changes in our stock price impact the number of shares that would be included in our diluted earnings per share calculation at December 31, 2013.  It also shows the impact on the number of shares issuable upon conversion of the Notes and settlement of the purchased call options and sold warrants:
 
 
Share Price
 
Shares Underlying
1.875% Convertible
Notes
 
Warrant Shares
 
Total Treasury Method
Incremental Shares (a)
 
Shares Due to the
Company under
Notes Hedges
 
Incremental Shares
Issued/(received) by the
Company upon
Conversion (b)
$
 80.73 
 
 66,201 
 
 -
 
 66,201 
 
 (70,820)
 
 (4,619)
$
 90.73 
 
 321,444 
 
 -
 
 321,444 
 
 (343,871)
 
 (22,427)
$
 100.73 
 
 526,008 
 
 -
 
 526,008 
 
 (562,708)
 
 (36,700)
$
 110.73 
 
 693,624 
 
 121,738 
 
 815,362 
 
 (742,018)
 
 73,344 
$
 120.73 
 
 833,473 
 
 322,722 
 
 1,156,195 
 
 (891,625)
 
 264,570 
$
 130.73 
 
 951,927 
 
 492,957 
 
 1,444,884 
 
 (1,018,343)
 
 426,541 
                       
 
a) Represents the number of incremental shares that must be included in the calculation of fully diluted shares under U.S. GAAP.
 
b) Represents the number of incremental shares to be issued by the Company upon conversion of the Notes assuming concurrent
 
settlement of the note hedges and warrants.

16.   Financial Instruments
FASB’s authoritative guidance on fair value measurements defines a hierarchy which prioritizes the inputs in fair value measurements.  Level 1 measurements are measurements using quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.  Level 2 measurements use significant other observable inputs.  Level 3 measurements are measurements using significant unobservable inputs which require a company to develop its own assumptions.  In recording the fair value of assets and liabilities, companies must use the most reliable measurement available.

The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

         
Fair Value Measure
 
   
Carrying Value
   
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
   
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
   
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
                         
Investments of deferred compensation plans held in trust
  $ 42,465     $ 42,465     $ -     $ -  
Current portion of long-term debt
    183,564       193,032       -       -  


The following shows the carrying value, fair value and the hierarchy for our financial instruments as of December 31, 2012 (in thousands):

         
Fair Value Measure
 
   
Carrying Value
   
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets
for Identical
Assets (Level 1)
   
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs (Level 2)
   
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs (Level 3)
 
                         
Investments of deferred compensation plans held in trust
  $ 36,089     $ 36,089     $ -     $ -  
Long-term debt
    174,890       197,874       -       -  

For cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable and accounts payable, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value because of the liquidity and short-term nature of these instruments.

 
74

 
 
17.   Loans Receivable from Independent Contractors
At December 31, 2013, we had contractual arrangements with 68 independent contractors to provide plumbing repair and drain cleaning services under sublicensing agreements using the Roto-Rooter name in lesser-populated areas of the United States and Canada. The arrangements give the independent contractors the right to conduct a plumbing and drain cleaning business using the Roto-Rooter name in a specified territory in exchange for a royalty based on a percentage of labor sales, generally approximately 40%.  We also pay for certain telephone directory advertising in these areas, lease certain capital equipment and provide operating manuals to serve as resources for operating a plumbing and drain cleaning business.  The contracts are generally cancelable upon 90 days’ written notice (without cause) or upon a few days notice (with cause).  The independent contractors are responsible for running the businesses as they believe best.
 
Our maximum exposure to loss from arrangements with our independent contractors at December 31, 2013 is approximately $1.5 million (2012 - $1.3 million).  The exposure to loss is mainly the result of loans provided to the independent contractors.  In most cases, these loans are partially secured by receivables and equipment owned by the independent contractor.  The interest rates on the loans range from zero to 8% per annum, and the remaining terms of the loans range from 2.5 months to 5.4 years at December 31, 2013.  We recorded the following from our independent contractors (in thousands):

   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
                   
Revenues
  $ 33,030     $ 28,522     $ 26,711  
Pretax profits
    17,726       14,790       13,320  

18.   Legal and Regulatory Matters
The VITAS segment of the Company’s business operates in a heavily-regulated industry.  As a result, the Company is subjected to inquiries and investigations by various government agencies, as well as to lawsuits, including qui tam actions.  The following sections describe the various ongoing material lawsuits and investigations of which the Company is currently aware.  It is not possible at this time for us to estimate either the timing or outcome of any of those matters, or whether any potential loss, or range of potential losses, is probable or estimable.

Regulatory Matters and Litigation
In February 2010, Chemed and Roto-Rooter were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York,  Anthony Morangelli, et al., v. Chemed Corp. and Roto-Rooter Services Co.,  No. 10-CV-00876 (BMC).  The named plaintiffs, current and former technicians employed by Roto-Rooter who were paid on a commission basis, asserted against Chemed and Roto-Rooter claims for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and claims for violations of the labor laws of multiple states.  In June 2013 the parties reached an agreement to settle the case for $14.3 million plus applicable payroll taxes ($9.0 million after tax). As such, $14.8 million is recorded as other operating expense in the year ended December 31, 2013 Statement of Income and is included in accrued legal at December 31, 2013.
  
VITAS is party to a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County in September 2006 by Bernadette Santos, Keith Knoche and Joyce White, Bernadette Santos, et al. v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, BC359356.  This case alleges failure to pay overtime and failure to provide meal and rest periods to a purported class of California admissions nurses, chaplains and sales representatives.  The case seeks payment of penalties, interest and Plaintiffs’ attorney fees.  In December 2009, the trial court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.  In July 2011, the Court of Appeals affirmed denial of class certification on the travel time, meal and rest period claims, and reversed the trial court’s denial on the off-the-clock and sales representation exemption claims.  Plaintiffs filed an appeal of this decision.  In September 2012, in response to an order of reconsideration, the Court of Appeals reiterated its previous rulings.  In March 2013, the Court granted summary judgment dismissing the sales representatives’ claims as they are exempt employees.  In October 2013 we reached agreement to settle the case for $10.3 million plus applicable payroll taxes ($6.5 million aftertax).  As such, $10.5 million is recorded as other operating expense in the year ended December 31, 2013 Statement of Income. This settlement was paid in 2013.

 
75

 
 
On January 12, 2012, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio against the Company, Kevin McNamara, David Williams, and Timothy O’Toole, In re Chemed Corp. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-28 (S.D. Ohio).  On June 18, 2012, an amended complaint was filed alleging violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 against all Defendants, and violation of Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against Messrs. McNamara, Williams, and O’Toole.  The suit’s allegations concern the VITAS hospice segment of the Company’s business.  Plaintiffs seek, on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Chemed Capital Stock, compensatory damages in an unspecified amount and attorneys’ fees and expenses, arising from Defendants’ alleged failure to disclose an alleged fraudulent scheme at VITAS to enroll ineligible hospice patients and to fraudulently obtain payments from the federal government.  Defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint on August 17, 2012, which were pending when the parties reached an agreement to settle the action.  On June 7, 2013, following the filing of U.S. v. VITAS, discussed below, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.  Defendants opposed this motion.  On September 16, 2013, Plaintiffs executed a Settlement Term Sheet with Defendants, reaching an agreement in principle to settle this case subject to Court approval.  On February 6, 2014, Plaintiffs, on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Chemed Capital Stock between February 15, 2010 and May 2, 2013, inclusive, executed a stipulation of settlement with defendants, agreeing to settle this case in full and with prejudice, and to provide Defendants with full releases of all claims that are or could have been asserted by Plaintiffs in exchange for payment of $6.0 million by our insurer into a settlement fund for the benefit of the putative settlement class (“Settlement”).  The Settlement has been recorded as an accrual and offsetting prepaid in the accompanying Balance Sheet. This Settlement is subject to Court approval.  Defendants agreed to enter into this Settlement in order to eliminate the burden, expense and distraction of further litigation.
 
In June 2011, the U.S. Attorney provided the Company with a partially unsealed qui tam complaint filed under seal in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas,  United States, et al. ex rel. Urick v. VITAS HME Solutions, Inc. et al., 5:08-cv-0663 (“Urick”).  The U.S. Attorney filed a notice in May 2012 stating that it had decided not to intervene in the case at that time but indicating that it continues to investigate the allegations.  In June 2012, the complaint was unsealed.  The complaint asserts violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act based on allegations of a conspiracy to submit to Medicare and Medicaid false claims involving hospice services for ineligible patients, unnecessary medical supplies, failing to satisfy certain prerequisites for payment, and altering patient records, including backdating patient revocations.  The suit was brought by Barbara Urick, a registered nurse in VITAS’s San Antonio program, against VITAS, certain of its affiliates, and several former VITAS employees, including physicians Justo Cisneros and Antonio Cavasos and nurses Sally Schwenk, Diane Anest, and Edith Reed.  In September 2012 and July 2013, the plaintiff dismissed all claims against the individual defendants.  The complaint was served on the VITAS entities on April 12, 2013.

Also in June 2011, the U.S. Attorney provided the Company with a partially unsealed qui tam complaint filed under seal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, United States, et al. ex rel. Spottiswood v. Chemed Corp., 1:07-cv-4566 (“Spottiswood”).  In April 2012, the complaint was unsealed.  The U.S. Attorney and Attorney General for the State of Illinois filed notices in April and May 2012, respectively, stating that they had decided not to intervene in the case at that time but indicating that they continue to investigate the allegations.  Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in November 2012.  The complaint asserts violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Illinois Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act based on allegations that VITAS fraudulently billed Medicare and Medicaid for providing unwarranted continuous care services.  The suit was brought by Laura Spottiswood, a former part-time pool registered nurse at VITAS, against Chemed, VITAS, and a VITAS affiliate.  The complaint was served on the defendants on April 12, 2013.  On May 29 and June 4, 2013, respectively, the Court granted the government’s motion to partially intervene in Spottiswood and in Urick on the allegations that VITAS submitted or caused to be submitted false or fraudulent claims for continuous care and routine home care on behalf of certain ineligible Medicare beneficiaries.  The Court also transferred them to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri under docket Nos. 4:13-cv-505 and 4:13-cv-563, respectively.

On May 2, 2013, the government filed a False Claims Act complaint against the Company and certain of its hospice-related subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al., No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”).  Prior to that date, the Company received various subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed.  The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002, VITAS, and since 2004, the Company, submitted or caused the submission of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course.  This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costs of the action, plus interest.  On August 1, 2013, the government filed its First Amended Complaint in the 2013 Action.  The First Amended Complaint changed and supplemented some of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of action or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS.  The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.
  
 
76

 
 
On May 6, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, at the request of the government, unsealed a qui tam complaint against VITAS and VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, United States ex rel. Charles Gonzales v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation, et al., CV 12-0761-R (“Gonzales”).  The case was transferred from the Central District of California to the Western District of Missouri under docket No. 4:13-cv-344.  The government partially intervened in Gonzales.  The Gonzales complaint alleges that VITAS’ Los Angeles program falsely certified and recertified patients as eligible for the Medicare Hospice Benefit.  It alleges violations of the False Claims Act and seeks treble damages, civil penalties, recovery of costs, attorneys’ fees and expenses, and pre- and post-judgment interest.  

On September 25, 2013, the Court granted a joint motion by the government, the relators, and VITAS to consolidate the Spottiswood,  Urick, and  Gonzales complaints with the 2013 Action.  As a result, the First Amended Complaint will govern the consolidated claims brought by the United States and the relators for all purposes.  The relators and VITAS have stipulated that certain non-intervened claims will not be pursued by the relators.

VITAS has also received document subpoenas in related state matters.  In February 2010, VITAS received a civil investigative demand (“CID”) from the Texas Attorney General seeking documents from January 1, 2002 through the date of the CID, and interrogatory responses in connection with an investigation of possible fraudulent submission of Medicaid claims for non-qualifying patients and fraudulent shifting of costs from VITAS to the State of Texas and the United States.  The CID requested similar information sought by prior Department of Justice subpoenas, including policy and procedure manuals and information concerning Medicare and Medicaid billing, patient statistics and sales and marketing practices, together with information concerning record-keeping and retention practices, and medical records concerning 117 patients.  In September 2010, VITAS received a second CID from the Texas Attorney General seeking additional documents concerning business plans and results, revocation forms for certain patients, and electronic documents of 10 current and former employees.  In July 2012, VITAS received an investigative subpoena from the Florida Attorney General seeking documents previously produced in the course of prior government investigations as well as, for the period January 1, 2007 through the date of production, billing records and procedures; information concerning business results, plans, and strategies; documents concerning patient eligibility for hospice care; and certain information concerning employees and their compensation.

In November 2013, two shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against the Company’s current and former directors, as well as certain of its officers both of which are covered by the Company’s commercial insurance.  On November 6, 2013, KBC Asset Management NV filed suit in the United States Distrct Court for the District of Delaware, KBC Asset Management NV, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. McNamara, et al., No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (D. Del.).  It sued Kevin McNamara, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Thomas Hutton, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, Arthur Tucker, Jr., George Walsh III, Frank Wood, Timothy O’Toole, David Williams and Ernest Mrozek, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that since at least 2004, Chemed, through VITAS, has submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare.  The suit alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants, and seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.

On November 14, 2013, Mildred A. North filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, North, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. Kevin McNamara, el al., No. 13 Civ. 833 (MDB) (S.D. Ohio).  She sued Kevin McNamara, David Williams, Timothy O’Toole, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, George Walsh III, Frank Wood and Thomas Hutton, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that, between February 2010 and the present, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties as officers and directors of Chemed by, among other things, (a) allegedly causing VITAS to submit improper and ineligible claims to Medicare and Medicaid; and (b) allegedly misrepresenting the state of Chemed’s internal controls.  The suit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control and gross mismanagement against the individual defendants.  The complaint also alleges unjust enrichment and insider trading against Messrs. McNamara, Williams and O’Toole.  Plaintiff seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.

 
77

 
 
On December 20, 2013, Plaintiff in the North action filed a motion before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking centralized treatment of her action and the KBC action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.  Defendants in both cases, as well as Plaintiff KBC, opposed that motion, consistent with Chemed’s By-law 8.07, which requires all derivative suits brought in Chemed’s name to proceed in federal or state court in Delaware.  The MDL Panel has yet to rule on that motion.  On January 29, 2014 Defendants filed motions to transfer North to Delaware under 28 U.S.C § 1404 and to stay the case until after resolution of that motion and the MDL motion.

The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits.  The Company had a net recovery for these OIG investigations, due to a one-time insurance reimbursement of $1.0 million for certain legal costs, for the year ended December 31, 2013. The net costs to comply with these investigations were $2.1 million, $1.2 million and $1.2 million for the years ending December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, responding to the subpoenas and dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity.  Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

19.  Concentration of Risk
VITAS has pharmacy services agreements (“Agreements”) with Omnicare, Inc. and its subsidiaries ("OCR") whereby OCR provides specified pharmacy services for VITAS and its hospice patients in geographical areas served by both VITAS and OCR.  Either party may cancel the Agreements at the end of any term by giving 90 days prior written notice.  VITAS made purchases from OCR of $39.0 million, $40.9 million and $39.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively, purchases from this vendor represent over 90% of all pharmacy services used by VITAS.  VITAS’ accounts payable to OCR and its subsidiaries was $3.8 million at December 31, 2013.

20.  Capital Stock Transactions
  On February 20, 2013, our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million for stock repurchase under the February 2011 repurchase program.  On November 7, 2011 our Board of Directors authorized an additional $100 million of stock repurchases under the February 2011 repurchase program. On February 22, 2011, our Board of Directors authorized $100 million of stock repurchases under the February 2011 repurchase program.  We repurchased the following capital stock:
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Shares repurchased
    1,356,344       932,706       2,602,513  
Weighted average price per share
  $ 68.50     $ 64.87     $ 55.28  

21.  Other Operating Expenses
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Litigation settlement of VITAS segment (a)
  $ 10,500     $ -     $ -  
Settlements of Roto-Rooter segment (b)
    15,721       -       -  
Severance and other operating costs related
                       
to closing Roto-Rooter's HVAC business
    -       1,126       -  
Total other operating expenses
  $ 26,221     $ 1,126     $ -  

(a)   
Santos claims discussed in Note 18.
(b)   
Morganelli claims discussed in Note 18 and estimated settlement of certain customer claims.

In August 2012, Roto-Rooter management made the decision to shut-down its one remaining heating, ventilation and air conditioning (HVAC) business located in Baltimore, Maryland.  The HVAC business was a portion of a larger business which included plumbing operations.  The plumbing and HVAC businesses shared facilities and administrative functions.  The costs and related cash flows of these shared facilities and administrative functions were not separately tracked or allocated for the HVAC operation.  As a result, the HVAC business does not qualify for discontinued operation treatment under US GAAP.  The operating results of the HVAC operation are reported in continuing operations in the consolidated financial statements for all periods presented.  The pretax costs incurred in conjunction with the shut-down were $1.1 million and are recorded in other operating expenses.  The costs comprise mainly severance and lease termination costs.

 
78

 
 
22.  Guarantor Subsidiaries
Our 1.875% Senior Convertible Notes issued on May 14, 2007, are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on an unsecured, joint and severally liable basis by 100% owned subsidiaries.  The equity method has been used with respect to the parent company’s (Chemed) investment in subsidiaries.  No consolidating adjustment column is presented for the condensed, consolidating statement of cash flow since there were no significant consolidating entries for the periods presented.  The following condensed, consolidating financial data present the composition of the parent company, the guarantor subsidiaries and the non-guarantor subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2013
 
Parent
   
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidating
Adjustments
   
Consolidated
 
ASSETS
                             
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 84,005     $ (8,777 )   $ 9,190     $ -     $ 84,418  
Accounts receivable, including intercompany
    925       509,580       1,000       (419,735 )     91,770  
Inventories
    -       6,246       457       -       6,703  
Current deferred income taxes
    -       21,307       126       (1,176 )     20,257  
Prepaid income taxes
    3,710       1,176       349       (1,545 )     3,690  
Prepaid expenses
    6,925       10,682       211       -       17,818  
     Total current assets
    95,565       540,214       11,333       (422,456 )     224,656  
Investments of deferred compensation plans
    -       -       42,465       -       42,465  
Properties and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation
    10,184       80,144       2,627       -       92,955  
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization
    -       56,556       -       -       56,556  
Goodwill
    -       462,489       4,382       -       466,871  
Other assets
    17,782       1,775       15,888       (25,247 )     10,198  
Investments in subsidiaries
    945,450       27,564       -       (973,014 )     -  
          Total assets
  $ 1,068,981     $ 1,168,742     $ 76,695     $ (1,420,717 )   $ 893,701  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                                       
Accounts payable, including intercompany
  $ 417,593     $ 39,424     $ 4,476     $ (419,735 )   $ 41,758  
Current portion of long-term debt
    183,564       -       -       -       183,564  
Income taxes
    1,106       210       340       (1,545 )     111  
Accrued insurance
    784       41,075       -       -       41,859  
Accrued compensation
    5,047       42,905       371       -       48,323  
Accrued legal
    6,031       17,179       -       -       23,210  
Other current liabilities
    2,739       22,219       1,379       (1,176 )     25,161  
      Total current liabilities
    616,864       163,012       6,566       (422,456 )     363,986  
Deferred income taxes
    -       52,548       -       (25,247 )     27,301  
Deferred compensation liabilities
    -       -       42,348       -       42,348  
Other liabilities
    3,227       6,914       1,035       -       11,176  
Stockholders' equity
    448,890       946,268       26,746       (973,014 )     448,890  
     Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
  $ 1,068,981     $ 1,168,742     $ 76,695     $ (1,420,717 )   $ 893,701  
December 31, 2012
 
Parent
   
Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   
Non-Guarantor
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidating
Adjustments
   
Consolidated
 
ASSETS
                                       
Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 56,342     $ 4,674     $ 8,515     $ -     $ 69,531  
Accounts receivable, including intercompany
    925       427,341       889       (335,822 )     93,333  
Inventories
    -       6,505       553       -       7,058  
Current deferred income taxes
    -       14,633       173       (1,147 )     13,659  
Prepaid income taxes
    4,043       -       -       (1,400 )     2,643  
Prepaid expenses
    564       10,656       227       -       11,447  
     Total current assets
    61,874       463,809       10,357       (338,369 )     197,671  
Investments of deferred compensation plans
    -       -       36,089       -       36,089  
Properties and equipment, at cost less accumulated depreciation
    10,984       78,236       2,714       -       91,934  
Identifiable intangible assets less accumulated amortization
    -       57,177       -       -       57,177  
Goodwill
    -       461,277       4,555       -       465,832  
Other assets
    19,025       2,005       13,797       (23,904 )     10,923  
Investments in subsidiaries
    874,692       24,298       -       (898,990 )     -  
          Total assets
  $ 966,575     $ 1,086,802     $ 67,512     $ (1,261,263 )   $ 859,626  
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
                                       
Accounts payable, including intercompany
  $ 325,916     $ 53,934     $ 4,444     $ (335,822 )   $ 48,472  
Income taxes
    1,019       3,816       1,503       (1,400 )     4,938  
Accrued insurance
    1,339       39,315       -       -       40,654  
Accrued compensation
    4,119       40,891       447       -       45,457  
Accrued legal
    6       1,155       -       -       1,161  
Other current liabilities
    2,780       12,748       1,759       (1,147 )     16,140  
      Total current liabilities
    335,179       151,859       8,153       (338,369 )     156,822  
Deferred income taxes
    -       51,566       -       (23,904 )     27,662  
Long-term debt
    174,890       -       -       -       174,890  
Deferred compensation liabilities
    -       -       35,599       -       35,599  
Other liabilities
    3,215       7,352       795       -       11,362  
Stockholders' equity
    453,291       876,025       22,965       (898,990 )     453,291  
     Total liabilities and stockholders' equity
  $ 966,575     $ 1,086,802     $ 67,512     $ (1,261,263 )   $ 859,626  
 
 
79

 

For the year ended December 31, 2013
       
Guarantor
   
Non-Guarantor
   
Consolidating
       
 
 
Parent
   
Subsidiaries
   
Subsidiaries
   
Adjustments
   
Consolidated
 
Net sales and service revenues
  $ -     $ 1,383,140     $ 30,189     $ -     $ 1,413,329  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    -       991,816       16,992       -       1,008,808  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    23,055       176,967       12,496       -       212,518  
Depreciation
    959       25,797       942       -       27,698  
Amortization
    1,981       2,709       -       -       4,690  
Other operating expenses
    -       26,221       -       -       26,221  
     Total costs and expenses
    25,995       1,223,510       30,430       -       1,279,935  
     Income/(loss) from operations
    (25,995 )     159,630       (241 )     -       133,394  
Interest expense
    (14,713 )     (504 )     182       -       (15,035 )
Other (expense)/income - net
    16,326       (15,833 )     4,977       -       5,470  
     Income/(loss) before income taxes
    (24,382 )     143,293       4,918       -       123,829  
Income tax (provision)/benefit
    7,729       (54,456 )     125       -       (46,602 )
Equity in net income of subsidiaries
    93,880       4,409       -       (98,289 )     -  
Net income
  $ 77,227     $ 93,246     $ 5,043     $ (98,289 )   $ 77,227  
                                         
For the year ended December 31, 2012
         
Guarantor
   
Non-Guarantor
   
Consolidating
         
 
 
Parent
   
Subsidiaries
   
Subsidiaries
   
Adjustments
   
Consolidated
 
Net sales and service revenues
  $ -     $ 1,400,561     $ 29,482     $ -     $ 1,430,043  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    -       1,017,001       16,320       -       1,033,321  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    22,618       175,166       10,872       -       208,656  
Depreciation
    942       24,179       888       -       26,009  
Amortization
    1,924       2,588       -       -       4,512  
Other operating expenses
    -       1,126       -       -       1,126  
     Total costs and expenses
    25,484       1,220,060       28,080       -       1,273,624  
     Income/(loss) from operations
    (25,484 )     180,501       1,402       -       156,419  
Interest expense
    (13,999 )     (666 )     (58 )     -       (14,723 )
Other (expense)/income - net
    17,626       (16,992 )     3,489       -       4,123  
     Income/(loss) before income taxes
    (21,857 )     162,843       4,833       -       145,819  
Income tax (provision)/benefit
    7,001       (61,794 )     (1,722 )     -       (56,515 )
Equity in net income of subsidiaries
    104,160       3,190       -       (107,350 )     -  
Net income
  $ 89,304     $ 104,239     $ 3,111     $ (107,350 )   $ 89,304  
                                         
For the year ended December 31, 2011
         
Guarantor
   
Non-Guarantor
   
Consolidating
         
 
 
Parent
   
Subsidiaries
   
Subsidiaries
   
Adjustments
   
Consolidated
 
Net sales and service revenues
  $ -     $ 1,328,425     $ 27,545     $ -     $ 1,355,970  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    -       955,628       14,856       -       970,484  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    21,895       172,368       7,997       -       202,260  
Depreciation
    945       23,496       806       -       25,247  
Amortization
    1,756       2,496       -       -       4,252  
     Total costs and expenses
    24,596       1,153,988       23,659       -       1,202,243  
     Income/(loss) from operations
    (24,596 )     174,437       3,886       -       153,727  
Interest expense
    (13,177 )     (587 )     (124 )     -       (13,888 )
Other (expense)/income - net
    16,507       (16,591 )     801       -       717  
     Income/(loss) before income taxes
    (21,266 )     157,259       4,563       -       140,556  
Income tax (provision)/benefit
    6,564       (59,407 )     (1,734 )     -       (54,577 )
Equity in net income of subsidiaries
    100,681       3,001       -       (103,682 )     -  
Net income
  $ 85,979     $ 100,853     $ 2,829     $ (103,682 )   $ 85,979  
 
 
80

 
 
For the year ended December 31, 2013
       
Guarantor
   
Non-Guarantor
       
   
Parent
   
Subsidiaries
   
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidated
 
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
                       
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 9,592     $ 138,580     $ 2,675     $ 150,847  
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
                               
 Capital expenditures
    (160 )     (28,272 )     (892 )     (29,324 )
 Business combinations, net of cash acquired
    -       (2,257 )     -       (2,257 )
 Other sources/(uses) - net
    (66 )     255       46       235  
      Net cash used by investing activities
    (226 )     (30,274 )     (846 )     (31,346 )
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
                               
 Purchases of treasury stock
    (92,911 )     -       -       (92,911 )
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation
    (5,348 )     -       -       (5,348 )
 Dividends paid to shareholders
    (14,148 )     -       -       (14,148 )
 Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    17,122       -       -       17,122  
 Realized excess tax benefit on share based compensation
    3,982       -       -       3,982  
 Debt issuance costs
    (1,108 )     -       -       (1,108 )
 Change in cash overdrafts payable
    4,578       (15,993 )     -       (11,415 )
 Change in intercompany accounts
    106,082       (105,764 )     (318 )     -  
 Other sources - net
    48       -       (836 )     (788 )
      Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities
    18,297       (121,757 )     (1,154 )     (104,614 )
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    27,663       (13,451 )     675       14,887  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    56,342       4,674       8,515       69,531  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 84,005     $ (8,777 )   $ 9,190     $ 84,418  
For the year ended December 31, 2012
         
Guarantor
   
Non-Guarantor
         
   
Parent
   
Subsidiaries
   
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidated
 
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
                               
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 5,267     $ 123,431     $ 3,070     $ 131,768  
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
                               
 Capital expenditures
    (285 )     (33,944 )     (1,023 )     (35,252 )
 Business combinations, net of cash acquired
    -       (5,900 )     -       (5,900 )
 Other sources/(uses) - net
    178       312       (22 )     468  
      Net cash used by investing activities
    (107 )     (39,532 )     (1,045 )     (40,684 )
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
                               
Purchases of treasury stock
    (60,624 )     -       -       (60,624 )
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation
    (4,098 )     -       -       (4,098 )
 Dividends paid to shareholders
    (13,026 )     -       -       (13,026 )
 Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    12,310       -       -       12,310  
 Realized excess tax benefit on share based compensation
    3,435       -       -       3,435  
 Change in cash overdrafts payable
    (5,338 )     7,262       -       1,924  
 Change in intercompany accounts
    85,935       (85,065 )     (870 )     -  
 Other sources - net
    118       -       327       445  
      Net cash provided/(used) by financing activities
    18,712       (77,803 )     (543 )     (59,634 )
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents
    23,872       6,096       1,482       31,450  
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    32,470       (1,422 )     7,033       38,081  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 56,342     $ 4,674     $ 8,515     $ 69,531  
For the year ended December 31, 2011
         
Guarantor
   
Non-Guarantor
         
   
Parent
   
Subsidiaries
   
Subsidiaries
   
Consolidated
 
Cash Flow from Operating Activities:
                               
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 12,444     $ 158,159     $ 3,740     $ 174,343  
Cash Flow from Investing Activities:
                               
 Capital expenditures
    (73 )     (28,145 )     (1,374 )     (29,592 )
 Business combinations, net of cash acquired
    -       (3,664 )     -       (3,664 )
 Other sources/(uses) - net
    (191 )     (730 )     63       (858 )
      Net cash used by investing activities
    (264 )     (32,539 )     (1,311 )     (34,114 )
Cash Flow from Financing Activities:
                               
Purchases of treasury stock
    (143,970 )     -       -       (143,970 )
Capital stock surrendered to pay taxes on stock-based compensation
    (3,916 )     -       -       (3,916 )
 Dividends paid to shareholders
    (12,538 )     -       -       (12,538 )
 Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    8,036       -       -       8,036  
 Realized excess tax benefit on share based compensation
    3,854       -       -       3,854  
 Debt issuance costs
    (2,657 )     -       -       (2,657 )
 Change in cash overdrafts payable
    9       (835 )     -       (826 )
 Change in intercompany accounts
    126,040       (124,636 )     (1,404 )     -  
 Other sources - net
    108       -       (156 )     (48 )
      Net cash used by financing activities
    (25,034 )     (125,471 )     (1,560 )     (152,065 )
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
    (12,854 )     149       869       (11,836 )
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
    45,324       (1,571 )     6,164       49,917  
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
  $ 32,470     $ (1,422 )   $ 7,033     $ 38,081  
 
 
81

 

UNAUDITED SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
 
                               
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                             
(in thousands, except per share and footnote data)
                             
                               
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2013
 
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Total service revenues and sales
  $ 366,641     $ 357,198     $ 340,886     $ 348,604     $ 1,413,329  
Gross profit (excluding depreciation)
  $ 102,334     $ 101,839     $ 97,702     $ 102,646     $ 404,521  
Income from operations
  $ 38,852     $ 25,892     $ 29,210     $ 39,440     $ 133,394  
Interest expense
    (4,094 )     (3,697 )     (3,500 )     (3,744 )     (15,035 )
Other income/(expense)--net
    1,706       1,696       (90 )     2,158       5,470  
Income before income taxes
    36,464       23,891       25,620       37,854       123,829  
Income taxes
    (14,186 )     (9,283 )     (8,188 )     (14,945 )     (46,602 )
Net income (a)
  $ 22,278     $ 14,608     $ 17,432     $ 22,909     $ 77,227  
                                         
Earnings Per Share (a)
                                       
    Net income
  $ 1.20     $ 0.79     $ 0.96     $ 1.31     $ 4.24  
    Average number of shares outstanding
    18,522       18,606       18,184       17,492       18,199  
                                         
Diluted Earnings Per Share (a)
                                       
    Net income
  $ 1.17     $ 0.77     $ 0.94     $ 1.28     $ 4.16  
    Average number of shares outstanding
    19,000       18,966       18,522       17,899       18,585  
                                         
                                         
(a) The following amounts are included in income during the respective quarter (in thousands):
 
                                         
                                         
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Pretax (cost)/benefit:
                           
    Stock option expense
  $ (1,491 )   $ (1,612 )   $ (1,629 )   $ (1,310 )   $ (6,042 )
    Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    (2,091 )     (2,132 )     (2,174 )     (2,216 )     (8,613 )
    Long-term incentive compensation
    (612 )     (494 )     (55 )     (140 )     (1,301 )
    Expenses of severance arrangements
    (302 )     -       -       -       (302 )
    Loss on extinguishment of debt
    (465 )     -       -       -       (465 )
    Acquisition expenses
    (1 )     (20 )     (21 )     (20 )     (62 )
    Litigation Settlement
    -       (14,760 )     (11,461 )     -       (26,221 )
    Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (141 )     (567 )     (443 )     (274 )     (1,425 )
    Expenses related to securities litigation
    (2 )     (1 )     (1 )     (105 )     (109 )
    Expenses/(cost recovery) related to the Office
                                       
        of Inspector General investigation
    (1,039 )     (996 )     591       (705 )     (2,149 )
            Total
  $ (6,144 )   $ (20,582 )   $ (15,193 )   $ (4,770 )   $ (46,689 )
After-tax (cost)/benefit:
                                       
    Stock option expense
  $ (943 )   $ (1,020 )   $ (1,030 )   $ (820 )   $ (3,813 )
    Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    (1,323 )     (1,348 )     (1,375 )     (1,402 )     (5,448 )
    Long-term incentive compensation
    (387 )     (313 )     (34 )     (88 )     (822 )
    Uncertain tax position adjustments
    -       -       1,782       -       1,782  
    Expenses of severance arrangements
    (184 )     -       -       -       (184 )
    Loss on extinguishment of debt
    (294 )     -       -       -       (294 )
    Acquisition expenses
    -       (13 )     (12 )     (13 )     (38 )
    Litigation Settlement
    -       (8,967 )     (7,094 )     -       (16,061 )
    Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (86 )     (344 )     (269 )     (166 )     (865 )
    Expenses related to securities litigation
    (1 )     (1 )     (1 )     (66 )     (69 )
    Expenses/(cost recovery) related to the Office
                                       
        of Inspector General investigation
    (644 )     (618 )     367       (438 )     (1,333 )
            Total
  $ (3,862 )   $ (12,624 )   $ (7,666 )   $ (2,993 )   $ (27,145 )
 
 
82

 
 
UNAUDITED SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY RESULTS
 
                               
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                             
(in thousands, except per share and footnote data)
                             
                               
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
For the Year Ended December 31, 2012
 
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Total service revenues and sales
  $ 352,943     $ 354,170     $ 354,353     $ 368,577     $ 1,430,043  
Gross profit (excluding depreciation)
  $ 95,498     $ 96,802     $ 97,743     $ 106,679     $ 396,722  
Income from operations
  $ 34,977     $ 39,525     $ 35,970     $ 45,947     $ 156,419  
Interest expense
    (3,617 )     (3,672 )     (3,743 )     (3,691 )     (14,723 )
Other income/(expense)--net
    2,095       (970 )     1,840       1,158       4,123  
Income before income taxes
    33,455       34,883       34,067       43,414       145,819  
Income taxes
    (13,010 )     (13,609 )     (13,222 )     (16,674 )     (56,515 )
Net income (a)
  $ 20,445     $ 21,274     $ 20,845     $ 26,740     $ 89,304  
                                         
Earnings Per Share (a)
                                       
    Net income
  $ 1.08     $ 1.12     $ 1.10     $ 1.44     $ 4.72  
    Average number of shares outstanding
    18,958       18,998       18,960       18,628       18,924  
                                         
Diluted Earnings Per Share (a)
                                       
    Net income
  $ 1.06     $ 1.10     $ 1.07     $ 1.40     $ 4.62  
    Average number of shares outstanding
    19,353       19,369       19,404       19,053       19,339  
                                         
                                         
(a) The following amounts are included in income during the respective quarter (in thousands):
 
                                         
                                         
   
First
   
Second
   
Third
   
Fourth
   
Total
 
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Quarter
   
Year
 
Pretax (cost)/benefit:
                           
    Stock option expense
  $ (1,938 )   $ (2,374 )   $ (2,397 )   $ (1,421 )   $ (8,130 )
    Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    (1,935 )     (1,973 )     (2,011 )     (2,052 )     (7,971 )
    Costs to shutdown HVAC operations
    -       -       (1,126 )     -       (1,126 )
    Acquisition expenses
    (15 )     (20 )     (87 )     (66 )     (188 )
    Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (647 )     (80 )     (116 )     (173 )     (1,016 )
    Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       (197 )     (68 )     (477 )     (742 )
    Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       -       (360 )     (360 )
    Expenses incurred in connection with the Office
                                       
        of Inspector General investigation
    (71 )     (195 )     (483 )     (463 )     (1,212 )
            Total
  $ (4,606 )   $ (4,839 )   $ (6,288 )   $ (5,012 )   $ (20,745 )
After-tax (cost)/benefit:
                                       
    Stock option expense
  $ (1,225 )   $ (1,502 )   $ (1,516 )   $ (900 )   $ (5,143 )
    Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    (1,224 )     (1,248 )     (1,272 )     (1,297 )     (5,041 )
    Costs to shutdown HVAC operations
    -       -       (649 )     -       (649 )
    Acquisition expenses
    (9 )     (12 )     (53 )     (40 )     (114 )
    Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (393 )     (49 )     (70 )     (105 )     (617 )
    Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       (124 )     (44 )     (301 )     (469 )
    Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       -       (228 )     (228 )
    Expenses incurred in connection with the Office
                                       
        of Inspector General investigation
    (44 )     (121 )     (300 )     (287 )     (752 )
            Total
  $ (2,895 )   $ (3,056 )   $ (3,904 )   $ (3,158 )   $ (13,013 )
 
 
83

 
 
SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
     
                               
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
                             
(in thousands, except per share and footnote data, ratios, percentages and personnel)
 
                               
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
   
2010
   
2009
 
Summary of Operations
                             
   Continuing operations (a)
                             
      Service revenues and sales
  $ 1,413,329     $ 1,430,043     $ 1,355,970     $ 1,280,545     $ 1,190,236  
      Gross profit (excluding depreciation)
    404,521       396,722       385,486       374,529       355,662  
      Depreciation
    27,698       26,009       25,247       24,386       21,535  
      Amortization
    4,690       4,512       4,252       4,657       6,367  
      Income  from operations
    133,394       156,419       153,727       143,522       126,345  
      Income from continuing operations (b)
    77,227       89,304       85,979       81,831       74,037  
      Net income (b)
    77,227       89,304       85,979       81,831       73,784  
   Earnings per share
                                       
      Income from continuing operations
  $ 4.24     $ 4.72     $ 4.19     $ 3.62     $ 3.30  
      Net income
    4.24       4.72       4.19       3.62       3.29  
      Average number of shares outstanding
    18,199       18,924       20,523       22,587       22,451  
   Diluted earnings per share
                                       
      Income from continuing operations
  $ 4.16     $ 4.62     $ 4.10     $ 3.55     $ 3.26  
      Net income
    4.16       4.62       4.10       3.55       3.24  
      Average number of shares outstanding
    18,585       19,339       20,945       23,031       22,742  
   Cash dividends per share
  $ 0.76     $ 0.68     $ 0.60     $ 0.52     $ 0.36  
Financial Position--Year-End
                                       
   Cash and cash equivalents
  $ 84,418     $ 69,531     $ 38,081     $ 49,917     $ 112,416  
   Working capital/(deficit)
    (139,330 )     40,849       5,353       47,455       62,174  
   Current ratio
    0.62       1.26       1.04       1.32       1.46  
   Properties and equipment, at cost less
                                       
      accumulated depreciation
  $ 92,955     $ 91,934     $ 82,951     $ 79,292     $ 75,358  
   Total assets
    893,701       859,626       795,905       830,161       819,470  
   Long-term debt
    -       174,890       166,784       159,208       152,127  
   Stockholders' equity
    448,890       453,291       413,684       462,049       477,162  
Other Statistics
                                       
   Capital expenditures
  $ 29,324     $ 35,252     $ 29,592     $ 25,639     $ 21,496  
   Number of employees
    13,952       14,096       13,733       13,058       12,308  
                                         
(a) Continuing operations exclude VITAS of Arizona, discontinued in 2006, Service America, discontinued in 2004 and Patient Care discontinued in 2002
 
(b) The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations during the respective year (in thousands):
 
                                         
      2013       2012       2011       2010       2009  
After-tax benefit/(cost):
                                       
     Stock option expense
  $ (3,813 )   $ (5,143 )   $ (5,298 )   $ (4,909 )   $ (5,464 )
     Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
    (5,448 )     (5,041 )     (4,664 )     (4,313 )     (3,988 )
     Long-term incentive compensation
    (822 )     (228 )     (1,880 )     (2,957 )     (3,134 )
     Litigation settlements
    (16,061 )     -       -       -       -  
     Expneses related to litigation settlements
    (865 )     (617 )     (1,397 )     (1,126 )     (534 )
     Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                                       
          General investigation
    (1,333 )     (752 )     (737 )     (627 )     (363 )
     Acquisition expense
    (38 )     (114 )     (75 )     (198 )     -  
     Cost to shut down HVAC operations
    -       (649 )     -       -       -  
     Expenses of securities litigation
    (69 )     (469 )     -       -       -  
     Expenses associated with contested proxy solicitation
    -       -       -       -       (2,525 )
     Non-taxable income on certain investments held in deferred
                                       
          compensation trusts
    -       -       -       -       1,211  
     Income tax impact of nondeductible losses on investments
                                       
          held in deferred compensation trusts
    -       -       -       -       (455 )
     Loss on extinguishment of debt
    (294 )     -       -       -       -  
     Severance arrangements
    (184 )     -       -       -       -  
     Uncertain tax position adjustments
    1,782       -       -       -       -  
          Total
  $ (27,145 )   $ (13,013 )   $ (14,051 )   $ (14,130 )   $ (15,252 )
 
 
84

 
 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013
 
(in thousands)(unaudited)
 
                   
       
Roto-
       
Chemed
 
 
VITAS
   
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
2013
                     
Service revenues and sales
$ 1,045,113     $ 368,216     $ -     $ 1,413,329  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
  813,600       195,208       -       1,008,808  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  82,252       102,592       27,674       212,518  
Depreciation
  18,149       9,014       535       27,698  
Amortization
  2,102       607       1,981       4,690  
Other operating expenses
  10,500       15,721       -       26,221  
Total costs and expenses
  926,603       323,142       30,190       1,279,935  
Income/(loss) from operations
  118,510       45,074       (30,190 )     133,394  
Interest expense
  (182 )     (322 )     (14,531 )     (15,035 )
Intercompany interest income/(expense)
  4,288       2,055       (6,343 )     -  
Other income/(expense)—net
  438       (4 )     5,036       5,470  
Income/(loss) before income taxes
  123,054       46,803       (46,028 )     123,829  
Income taxes
  (46,910 )     (17,560 )     17,868       (46,602 )
Net income/(loss)
$ 76,144     $ 29,243     $ (28,160 )   $ 77,227  
                               
                               
(a) The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations (in thousands):
 
         
Roto-
             
Chemed
 
 
VITAS
   
Rooter
     
Corporate
     
Consolidated
 
Pretax benefit/(cost):
                             
Stock option expense
$ -     $ -     $ (6,042 )   $ (6,042 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
  -       -       (8,613 )     (8,613 )
Long-term incentive compensation
  -       -       (1,301 )     (1,301 )
Loss on extinguishment of debt
  -       -       (465 )     (465 )
Securities litigation
  -       -       (109 )     (109 )
Litigation settlement costs
  (10,500 )     (15,721 )     -       (26,221 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
  -       (1,425 )     -       (1,425 )
Severance arrangements
  -       (302 )     -       (302 )
Acquisition expense
  (58 )     (4 )     -       (62 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                             
General investigation
  (2,149 )     -       -       (2,149 )
Total
$ (12,707 )   $ (17,452 )   $ (16,530 )   $ (46,689 )
                               
           
Roto-
             
Chemed
 
 
VITAS
     
Rooter
     
Corporate
     
Consolidated
 
After-tax benefit/(cost):
                             
Stock option expense
$ -     $ -     $ (3,813 )   $ (3,813 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
  -       -       (5,448 )     (5,448 )
Long-term incentive compensation
  -       -       (822 )     (822 )
Loss on extinguishment of debt
  -       -       (294 )     (294 )
Securities litigation
  -       -       (69 )     (69 )
Litigation settlement costs
  (6,510 )     (9,551 )     -       (16,061 )
Expenses related to litigation settlements
  -       (865 )     -       (865 )
Severance arrangements
  -       (184 )     -       (184 )
Acquisition expense
  (36 )     (2 )     -       (38 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                             
General investigation
  (1,333 )     -       -       (1,333 )
Uncertain tax position adjustments
  -       -       1,782       1,782  
Total
$ (7,879 )   $ (10,602 )   $ (8,664 )   $ (27,145 )

 
85

 
 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012
 
(in thousands)(unaudited)
 
                   
       
Roto-
     
Chemed
 
 
VITAS
   
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
2012
                     
Service revenues and sales
$ 1,067,037     $ 363,006     $ -     $ 1,430,043  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
  831,321       202,000       -       1,033,321  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  80,494       102,366       25,796       208,656  
Depreciation
  17,087       8,397       525       26,009  
Amortization
  1,956       632       1,924       4,512  
Other operating expenses
  -       1,126       -       1,126  
Total costs and expenses
  930,858       314,521       28,245       1,273,624  
Income/(loss) from operations
  136,179       48,485       (28,245 )     156,419  
Interest expense
  (233 )     (433 )     (14,057 )     (14,723 )
Intercompany interest income/(expense)
  3,180       1,617       (4,797 )     -  
Other income/(expense)—net
  543       6       3,574       4,123  
Income/(loss) before income taxes
  139,669       49,675       (43,525 )     145,819  
Income taxes
  (53,092 )     (18,770 )     15,347       (56,515 )
Net income/(loss)
$ 86,577     $ 30,905     $ (28,178 )   $ 89,304  
                               
                               
(a) The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations (in thousands):
 
         
Roto-
             
Chemed
 
 
VITAS
   
Rooter
     
Corporate
     
Consolidated
 
Pretax benefit/(cost):
                             
Stock option expense
$ -     $ -     $ (8,130 )   $ (8,130 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
  -       -       (7,971 )     (7,971 )
Long-term incentive compensation
  -       -       (360 )     (360 )
Expenses of class action litigation
  -       (1,016 )     -       (1,016 )
Expenses of securities litigation
  -       -       (742 )     (742 )
Cost to shut down HVAC operations
  -       (1,126 )     -       (1,126 )
Acquisition expense
  (15 )     (173 )     -       (188 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                             
General investigation
  (1,212 )     -       -       (1,212 )
Total
$ (1,227 )   $ (2,315 )   $ (17,203 )   $ (20,745 )
                               
           
Roto-
                 
 
VITAS
     
Rooter
     
Corporate
     
Consolidated
 
After-tax benefit/(cost):
                             
Stock option expense
$ -     $ -     $ (5,143 )   $ (5,143 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
  -       -       (5,041 )     (5,041 )
Long-term incentive compensation
  -       -       (228 )     (228 )
Expenses of class action litigation
  -       (617 )     -       (617 )
Expenses of securities litigation
  -       -       (469 )     (469 )
Cost to shut down HVAC operations
  -       (649 )     -       (649 )
Acquisition expense
  (9 )     (105 )     -       (114 )
Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                             
General investigation
  (752 )     -       -       (752 )
Total
$ (761 )   $ (1,371 )   $ (10,881 )   $ (13,013 )
 
 
86

 
 
CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF INCOME
 
FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011
 
(in thousands)(unaudited)
 
                   
       
Roto-
     
Chemed
 
 
VITAS
   
Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
2011
                     
Service revenues and sales
$ 986,272     $ 369,698     $ -     $ 1,355,970  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
  766,732       203,752       -       970,484  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
  75,698       102,528       24,034       202,260  
Depreciation
  16,583       8,130       534       25,247  
Amortization
  1,897       599       1,756       4,252  
Total costs and expenses
  860,910       315,009       26,324       1,202,243  
Income/(loss) from operations
  125,362       54,689       (26,324 )     153,727  
Interest expense
  (229 )     (358 )     (13,301 )     (13,888 )
Intercompany interest income/(expense)
  3,998       2,136       (6,134 )     -  
Other income/(expense)—net
  62       (235 )     890       717  
Income/(loss) before income taxes
  129,193       56,232       (44,869 )     140,556  
Income taxes
  (48,835 )     (21,353 )     15,611       (54,577 )
Net income/(loss)
$ 80,358     $ 34,879     $ (29,258 )   $ 85,979  
                               
                               
(a) The following amounts are included in income from continuing operations (in thousands):
 
           
Roto-
             
Chemed
 
 
VITAS
     
Rooter
     
Corporate
     
Consolidated
 
Pretax benefit/(cost):
                             
     Stock option expense
$ -     $ -     $ (8,376 )   $ (8,376 )
     Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
  -       -       (7,374 )     (7,374 )
     Long-term incentive compensation
  -       -       (3,012 )     (3,012 )
     Expenses of class action litigation
  -       (2,299 )     -       (2,299 )
     Acquisition expense
  (147 )     26       -       (121 )
     Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                             
          General investigation
  (1,188 )     -       -       (1,188 )
          Total
$ (1,335 )   $ (2,273 )   $ (18,762 )   $ (22,370 )
                               
           
Roto-
                 
 
VITAS
     
Rooter
     
Corporate
     
Consolidated
 
After-tax benefit/(cost):
                             
     Stock option expense
$ -     $ -       (5,298 )     (5,298 )
     Noncash impact of change in accounting for convertible debt
  -       -       (4,664 )     (4,664 )
     Long-term incentive compensation
  -       -       (1,880 )     (1,880 )
     Expenses of class action litigation
  -       (1,397 )     -       (1,397 )
     Acquisition expense
  (91 )     16       -       (75 )
     Expenses incurred in connection with the Office of Inspector
                             
          General investigation
  (737 )     -       -       (737 )
          Total
$ (828 )   $ (1,381 )   $ (11,842 )   $ (14,051 )

 
87

 

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
We operate through our two wholly owned subsidiaries: VITAS Healthcare Corporation (“VITAS”) and Roto-Rooter Group, Inc. (“Roto-Rooter”). VITAS focuses on hospice care that helps make terminally ill patients' final days as comfortable as possible. Through its team of doctors, nurses, home health aides, social workers, clergy and volunteers, VITAS provides direct medical services to patients, as well as spiritual and emotional counseling to both patients and their families. Roto-Rooter is focused on providing plumbing and drain cleaning services to both residential and commercial customers. Through its network of company-owned branches, independent contractors and franchisees, Roto-Rooter offers plumbing and drain cleaning service to over 90% of the U.S. population.

           The following is a summary of the key operating results for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (in thousands except percentages and per share amounts):
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Consolidated service revenues and sales
  $ 1,413,329     $ 1,430,043     $ 1,355,970  
Consolidated net income
  $ 77,227     $ 89,304     $ 85,979  
Diluted EPS
  $ 4.16     $ 4.62     $ 4.10  
Adjusted net income
  $ 104,372     $ 102,317     $ 100,030  
Adjusted diluted EPS
  $ 5.62     $ 5.29     $ 4.78  
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 206,850     $ 201,455     $ 197,273  
Adjusted EBITDA as a % of revenue
    14.6 %     14.1     14.5 %

Adjusted net income, adjusted diluted EPS, earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation and amortization (“EBITDA”) and Adjusted EBITDA are not measures derived in accordance with GAAP.  We use Adjusted EPS as a measure of earnings for certain long-term incentive awards.  We also use adjusted EBITDA to determine compliance with certain debt covenants.  We provide non-GAAP measures to help readers evaluate our operating results, compare our operating performance with that of similar companies that have different capital structures and help evaluate our ability to meet future debt service, capital expenditure and working capital requirements.  Our non-GAAP measures should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for comparable measures presented in accordance with GAAP.  Reconciliations of our non-GAAP measures are presented in tables following the Critical Accounting Policies section.

2013 versus 2012
The decrease in consolidated service revenues and sales from 2012 to 2013 was a result of a 1.4% increase at Roto-Rooter offset by a 2.1% decrease at VITAS.    The increase at Roto-Rooter was driven by a 3.5% increase in price and mix shift offset by a decrease in job count of 1.9%.  The decrease in service revenues at VITAS was a result of Medicare reimbursement rates including the effects of sequestration, declining approximately 0.5%, a $7.0 million net Medicare cap charge (compared to a reversal of $1.7 million in the same period of 2012) and level of care mix shift offset by increased average daily census (“ADC”) of 1.7%.  Consolidated net income decreased 13.5% over prior year mainly as a result of the $16.1 million (after tax) in litigation settlements as well as the lower revenue at VITAS.  Diluted EPS decreased mainly as a result of the decrease in earnings offset by an decrease in the number of shares outstanding.  Adjusted EBITDA as a percent of revenue increased 2.7% from 2012 to 2013 mainly as a result of improved gross margins at Roto-Rooter.

2012 versus 2011
The increase in consolidated service revenues and sales from 2011 to 2012 was driven by a 8.2% increase at VITAS offset by a 1.8% decrease at Roto-Rooter.  The increase at VITAS was the result of an increase in ADC of 5.5%, driven by an increase in admissions of 6.0%, increased discharges of 4.6% and Medicare price increases of approximately 2.5%.  The decrease at Roto-Rooter was driven by a decrease in job count of 3.3% offset by a 2.1% increase in price and mix shift.  Consolidated net income increased 3.9% over prior year mainly as a result of the increase in revenues.  Diluted EPS increased as the result of increased earnings and a decrease in the number of shares outstanding.  Adjusted EBITDA increased 2.1% from 2011 to 2012 mainly as a result of increased earnings.

While we have significant operations in the Northeast, we had no material casualty losses or business interruption as a result of Hurricane Sandy.

 
88

 
 
Impact of Current Market Conditions
We expect Roto-Rooter to achieve full-year 2014 revenue growth of 3.0% to 4.0%.  This revenue estimate is based upon increased job pricing of approximately 2.0% and job count growth essentially equal to the prior year.  Adjusted EBITDA margin for 2014 is estimated in the range of 19.0% to 20.0%.

We expect VITAS to achieve full-year 2014 revenue growth, prior to Medicare cap, of 1.0% to 3.0%.  Admissions in 2014 are estimated to increase 3.0% to 4.0%. This revenue estimate includes the April 1, 2013 reduction in hospice reimbursement rates of 2.0% offset by the October 1, 2013, 0.9% increase in average hospice reimbursement rates for a net decrease of 1.1%.  We also expect VITAS to have estimated Medicare contractual billing limitations of $5.6 million.  Adjusted EBITDA margin, prior to Medicare cap, for 2014 is estimated to be in the range of 14.5% to 15.0%.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Significant factors affecting our cash flows during 2013 and financial position at December 31, 2013, include the following:
     
Our operations generated cash of $150.8 million.
     
We repurchased $92.9 million of our stock in the open market using cash on hand.
     
We spent $29.3 million on capital expenditures.
     
$2.3 million cash paid for business acquisitions.
     
An increase in dividends paid of 8.6% to $14.1 million.
     
A $6.6 million increase in current deferred income taxes due mainly to the accrual of litigation settlements.
     
A reclass of our convertible notes from long-term to current as they are due in May 2014.
     
A $31.1 million increase in other current liabilities primarily due to unpaid litigation settlements and the Medicare cap liability.

The ratio of total debt to total capital was 29.0% at December 31, 2013, compared with 27.8% at December 31, 2012. Our current ratio was 0.62 and 1.26 at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The decrease in the current ratio is a primarily a result of the reclass of long term debt from long term liabilities to short term liabilities during 2013.

Collectively, the 2013 Credit Agreement and the Notes require us to meet certain restrictive non-financial and financial covenants.  We are in compliance with all non-financial debt covenants as of December 31, 2013.  The restrictive financial covenants are defined in the 2013 Credit Agreement and include maximum leverage ratios, minimum fixed charge coverage and consolidated net worth ratios, limits on operating leases and minimum asset value limits.  We are in compliance with all financial debt covenants as of December 31, 2013, as follows:
 
Description
 
Requirement
 
Chemed
         
Leverage Ratio (Consolidated Indebtedness/Consolidated  Adj.
       
EBITDA)
 
< 3.50 to 1.00
 
1.07 to 1.00
         
Fixed Charge Coverage Ratio (Consolidated Free Cash
       
Flow/Consolidated Fixed Charges
 
> 1.50 to 1.00
 
2.25 to 1.00
         
Annual Operating Lease Commitment
 
< $30.0 million
 
$26.5 million

Our 2013 Credit Agreement replaced the 2011 Credit Agreement in January 2013.  We forecast to be in compliance with all debt covenants through fiscal 2014.
 
We have issued $35.0 million in standby letters of credit as of December 31, 2013, mainly for insurance purposes.  Issued letters of credit reduce our available credit under the revolving credit agreement.  As of December 31, 2013, we have approximately $315.0 million of unused lines of credit available and eligible to be drawn down under our revolving credit facility, excluding the $150 million expansion feature.  We believe our cash flow from operating activities and our unused eligible lines of credit are sufficient to fund our obligations, including the convertible notes due May 2014, and operate our business in the near and long term.  We continually evaluate cash utilization alternatives, including share repurchase, debt repurchase, acquisitions, and increased dividends to determine the most beneficial use of available capital resources.

 
89

 

CASH FLOW
Our cash flows for 2013, 2012 and 2011 are summarized as follows (in millions):
 
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Net cash provided by operating activities
  $ 150.8     $ 131.8     $ 174.3  
Capital expenditures
    (29.3 )     (35.3 )     (29.6 )
Operating cash after capital expenditures
    121.5       96.5       144.7  
Purchase of treasury stock in the open market
    (92.9 )     (60.5 )     (143.9 )
Business combinations
    (2.3 )     (5.9 )     (3.7 )
Dividends paid
    (14.1 )     (13.0 )     (12.5 )
Proceeds from exercise of stock options
    17.1       12.3       8.0  
Increase/(decrease) in cash overdraft payable
    (11.4 )     1.9       (0.8 )
Other--net
    (3.0 )     0.2       (3.6 )
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
  $ 14.9     $ 31.5     $ (11.8 )

COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are subject to various lawsuits and claims in the normal course of our business.  In addition, we periodically receive communications from governmental and regulatory agencies concerning compliance with Medicare and Medicaid billing requirements at our VITAS subsidiary.  We establish reserves for specific, uninsured liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal action that we deem to be probable and estimable.  We disclose the existence of regulatory and legal actions when we believe it is reasonably possible that a loss could occur in connection with the specific action.  In most instances, we are unable to make a reasonable estimate of any reasonably possible liability due to the uncertainty of the outcome and stage of litigation.  We record legal fees associated with legal and regulatory actions as the costs are incurred.

In connection with the sale of DuBois Chemicals, Inc. ("DuBois") in 1991, we provided allowances and accruals relating to several long-term costs, including income tax matters, lease commitments and environmental costs.  Additionally, we retained liability for casualty insurance claims for Service America and Patient Care that were incurred prior to the respective disposal dates, 2005 and 2002.  In the aggregate, we believe these allowances and accruals are adequate as of December 31, 2013.  Based on reviews of our environmental-related liabilities under the DuBois sale agreement, we have estimated our remaining liability to be $1.7 million. As of December 31, 2013, we are contingently liable for additional cleanup and related costs up to a maximum of $14.9 million.  We do not believe it is probable that we will be required to make any payment towards this contingent liability. Thus, no provision has been recorded in accordance with the applicable accounting guidance.

In February 2010, Chemed and Roto-Rooter were named as defendants in a lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York,  Anthony Morangelli, et al., v. Chemed Corp. and Roto-Rooter Services Co.,  No. 10-CV-00876 (BMC).  The named plaintiffs, current and former technicians employed by Roto-Rooter who were paid on a commission basis, asserted against Chemed and Roto-Rooter claims for violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) and claims for violations of the labor laws of multiple states.  In June 2013 the parties reached an agreement to settle the case for $14.3 million plus applicable payroll taxes ($9.0 million after tax).  As such, $14.8 million is recorded as other operating expense in the year ended December 31, 2013 Statement of Income and is included in accrued legal at December 31, 2013.
  
VITAS is party to a class action lawsuit filed in the Superior Court of California, Los Angeles County in September 2006 by Bernadette Santos, Keith Knoche and Joyce White, Bernadette Santos, et al. v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, BC359356.  This case alleges failure to pay overtime and failure to provide meal and rest periods to a purported class of California admissions nurses, chaplains and sales representatives.  The case seeks payment of penalties, interest and Plaintiffs’ attorney fees.  In December 2009, the trial court denied Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification.  In July 2011, the Court of Appeals affirmed denial of class certification on the travel time, meal and rest period claims, and reversed the trial court’s denial on the off-the-clock and sales representation exemption claims.  Plaintiffs filed an appeal of this decision.  In September 2012, in response to an order of reconsideration, the Court of Appeals reiterated its previous rulings.  In March 2013, the Court granted summary judgment dismissing the sales representatives’ claims as they are exempt employees.  In October 2013 we reached agreement, to settle the case for $10.3 million plus applicable payroll taxes ($6.5 million aftertax).  As such, $10.5 million is recorded as other operating expense in the year ended December 31, 2013 Statement of Income. This settlement was paid in 2013.

 
90

 
 
On January 12, 2012, a putative class action lawsuit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio against the Company, Kevin McNamara, David Williams, and Timothy O’Toole, In re Chemed Corp. Securities Litigation, Civil Action No. 1:12-cv-28 (S.D. Ohio).  On June 18, 2012, an amended complaint was filed alleging violation of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 against all Defendants, and violation of Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against Messrs. McNamara, Williams, and O’Toole.  The suit’s allegations concern the VITAS hospice segment of the Company’s business.  Plaintiffs seek, on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Chemed Capital Stock, compensatory damages in an unspecified amount and attorneys’ fees and expenses, arising from Defendants’ alleged failure to disclose an alleged fraudulent scheme at VITAS to enroll ineligible hospice patients and to fraudulently obtain payments from the federal government.  Defendants filed motions to dismiss the amended complaint on August 17, 2012, which were pending when the parties reached an agreement to settle the action.  On June 7, 2013, following the filing of U.S. v. VITAS, discussed below, Plaintiffs filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint.  Defendants opposed this motion.  On September 16, 2013, Plaintiffs executed a Settlement Term Sheet with Defendants, reaching an agreement in principle to settle this case subject to Court approval.  On February 6, 2014, Plaintiffs, on behalf of a putative class of purchasers of Chemed Capital Stock between February 15, 2010 and May 2, 2013, inclusive, executed a stipulation of settlement with defendants, agreeing to settle this case in full and with prejudice, and to provide Defendants with full releases of all claims that are or could have been asserted by Plaintiffs in exchange for payment of $6.0 million by our insurer into a settlement fund for the benefit of the putative settlement class (“Settlement”).  The Settlement has been recorded as an accrual and offsetting prepaid in the accompanying Balance Sheet. This Settlement is subject to Court approval.  Defendants agreed to enter into this Settlement in order to eliminate the burden, expense and distraction of further litigation.

In June 2011, the U.S. Attorney provided the Company with a partially unsealed qui tam complaint filed under seal in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas,  United States, et al. ex rel. Urick v. VITAS HME Solutions, Inc. et al., 5:08-cv-0663 (“Urick”).  The U.S. Attorney filed a notice in May 2012 stating that it had decided not to intervene in the case at that time but indicating that it continues to investigate the allegations.  In June 2012, the complaint was unsealed.  The complaint asserts violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Texas Medicaid Fraud Prevention Act based on allegations of a conspiracy to submit to Medicare and Medicaid false claims involving hospice services for ineligible patients, unnecessary medical supplies, failing to satisfy certain prerequisites for payment, and altering patient records, including backdating patient revocations.  The suit was brought by Barbara Urick, a registered nurse in VITAS’s San Antonio program, against VITAS, certain of its affiliates, and several former VITAS employees, including physicians Justo Cisneros and Antonio Cavasos and nurses Sally Schwenk, Diane Anest, and Edith Reed.  In September 2012 and July 2013, the plaintiff dismissed all claims against the individual defendants.  The complaint was served on the VITAS entities on April 12, 2013.

Also in June 2011, the U.S. Attorney provided the Company with a partially unsealed qui tam complaint filed under seal in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, United States, et al. ex rel. Spottiswood v. Chemed Corp., 1:07-cv-4566 (“Spottiswood”).  In April 2012, the complaint was unsealed.  The U.S. Attorney and Attorney General for the State of Illinois filed notices in April and May 2012, respectively, stating that they had decided not to intervene in the case at that time but indicating that they continue to investigate the allegations.  Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in November 2012.  The complaint asserts violations of the federal False Claims Act and the Illinois Whistleblower Reward and Protection Act based on allegations that VITAS fraudulently billed Medicare and Medicaid for providing unwarranted continuous care services.  The suit was brought by Laura Spottiswood, a former part-time pool registered nurse at VITAS, against Chemed, VITAS, and a VITAS affiliate.  The complaint was served on the defendants on April 12, 2013.  On May 29 and June 4, 2013, respectively, the Court granted the government’s motion to partially intervene in Spottiswood and in Urick on the allegations that VITAS submitted or caused to be submitted false or fraudulent claims for continuous care and routine home care on behalf of certain ineligible Medicare beneficiaries.  The Court also transferred them to the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri under docket Nos. 4:13-cv-505 and 4:13-cv-563, respectively.

On May 2, 2013, the government filed a False Claims Act complaint against the Company and certain of its hospice-related subsidiaries in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, United States v. VITAS Hospice Services, LLC, et al., No. 4:13-cv-00449-BCW (the “2013 Action”).  Prior to that date, the Company received various subpoenas from the U.S. Department of Justice and OIG that have been previously disclosed.  The 2013 Action alleges that, since at least 2002, VITAS, and since 2004, the Company, submitted or caused the submission of false claims to the Medicare program by (a) billing Medicare for continuous home care services when the patients were not eligible, the services were not provided, or the medical care was inappropriate, and (b) billing Medicare for patients who were not eligible for the Medicare hospice benefit because they did not have a life expectancy of six months or less if their illnesses ran their normal course.  This complaint seeks treble damages, statutory penalties, and the costs of the action, plus interest.  On August 1, 2013, the government filed its First Amended Complaint in the 2013 Action.  The First Amended Complaint changed and supplemented some of the allegations, but did not otherwise expand the causes of action or the nature of the relief sought against VITAS.  The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on September 24, 2013.  

 
91

 
 
On May 6, 2013, the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, at the request of the government, unsealed a qui tam complaint against VITAS and VITAS Healthcare Corporation of California, United States ex rel. Charles Gonzales v. VITAS Healthcare Corporation, et al., CV 12-0761-R (“Gonzales”).  The case was transferred from the Central District of California to the Western District of Missouri under docket No. 4:13-cv-344.  The government partially intervened in  Gonzales.  The Gonzales complaint alleges that VITAS’ Los Angeles program falsely certified and recertified patients as eligible for the Medicare Hospice Benefit.  It alleges violations of the False Claims Act and seeks treble damages, civil penalties, recovery of costs, attorneys’ fees and expenses, and pre- and post-judgment interest.  

On September 25, 2013, the Court granted a joint motion by the government, the relators, and VITAS to consolidate the Spottiswood,  Urick, and  Gonzales complaints with the 2013 Action.  As a result, the First Amended Complaint will govern the consolidated claims brought by the United States and the relators for all purposes.  The relators and VITAS have stipulated that certain non-intervened claims will not be pursued by the relators.

VITAS has also received document subpoenas in related state matters.  In February 2010, VITAS received a civil investigative demand (“CID”) from the Texas Attorney General seeking documents from January 1, 2002 through the date of the CID, and interrogatory responses in connection with an investigation of possible fraudulent submission of Medicaid claims for non-qualifying patients and fraudulent shifting of costs from VITAS to the State of Texas and the United States.  The CID requested similar information sought by prior Department of Justice subpoenas, including policy and procedure manuals and information concerning Medicare and Medicaid billing, patient statistics and sales and marketing practices, together with information concerning record-keeping and retention practices, and medical records concerning 117 patients.  In September 2010, VITAS received a second CID from the Texas Attorney General seeking additional documents concerning business plans and results, revocation forms for certain patients, and electronic documents of 10 current and former employees.  In July 2012, VITAS received an investigative subpoena from the Florida Attorney General seeking documents previously produced in the course of prior government investigations as well as, for the period January 1, 2007 through the date of production, billing records and procedures; information concerning business results, plans, and strategies; documents concerning patient eligibility for hospice care; and certain information concerning employees and their compensation.

In November 2013, two shareholder derivative lawsuits were filed against the Company’s current and former directors, as well as certain of its officers both of which are covered by the Company’s commercial insurance.  On November 6, 2013, KBC Asset Management NV filed suit in the United States Distrct Court for the District of Delaware, KBC Asset Management NV, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. McNamara, et al., No. 13 Civ. 1854 (LPS) (D. Del.).  It sued Kevin McNamara, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Thomas Hutton, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, Arthur Tucker, Jr., George Walsh III, Frank Wood, Timothy O’Toole, David Williams and Ernest Mrozek, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that since at least 2004, Chemed, through VITAS, has submitted or caused the submission of false claims to Medicare.  The suit alleges a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against the individual defendants, and seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.

On November 14, 2013, Mildred A. North filed suit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, North, derivatively on behalf of Chemed Corp. v. Kevin McNamara, el al., No. 13 Civ. 833 (MDB) (S.D. Ohio).  She sued Kevin McNamara, David Williams, Timothy O’Toole, Joel Gemunder, Patrick Grace, Walter Krebs, Andrea Lindell, Thomas Rice, Donald Saunders, George Walsh III, Frank Wood and Thomas Hutton, together with the Company as nominal defendant.  Plaintiff alleges that, between February 2010 and the present, the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties as officers and directors of Chemed by, among other things, (a) allegedly causing VITAS to submit improper and ineligible claims to Medicare and Medicaid; and (b) allegedly misrepresenting the state of Chemed’s internal controls.  The suit alleges claims for breach of fiduciary duty, abuse of control and gross mismanagement against the individual defendants.  The complaint also alleges unjust enrichment and insider trading against Messrs. McNamara, Williams and O’Toole.  Plaintiff seeks (a) a declaration that the individual defendants breached their fiduciary duties to the Company; (b) an order requiring those defendants to pay compensatory damages, restitution and exemplary damages, in unspecified amounts, to the Company; (c) an order directing the Company to implement new policies and procedures; and (d) costs and disbursements incurred in bringing the action, including attorneys’ fees.

On December 20, 2013, Plaintiff in the North action filed a motion before the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation seeking centralized treatment of her action and the KBC action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio.  Defendants in both cases, as well as Plaintiff KBC, opposed that motion, consistent with Chemed’s By-law 8.07, which requires all derivative suits brought in Chemed’s name to proceed in federal or state court in Delaware.  The MDL Panel has yet to rule on that motion.  On January 29, 2014 Defendants filed motions to transfer North to Delaware under 28 U.S.C § 1404 and to stay the case until after resolution of that motion and the MDL motion.
 
 
92

 
 
The Company intends to defend vigorously against the allegations in each of the above lawsuits.  The Company had a net recovery for these OIG investigations, due to a one-time insurance reimbursement of $1.0 million for certain legal costs, for the year ended December 31, 2013. The net costs to comply with these investigations were $1.3 million, $752,000 and $737,000 for the years ending December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Regardless of the outcome of any of the preceding matters, responding to the subpoenas and dealing with the various regulatory agencies and opposing parties can adversely affect us through defense costs, potential payments, diversion of management time, and related publicity.  Although the Company intends to defend them vigorously, there can be no assurance that those suits will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.

CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS

The table below summarizes our debt and contractual obligations as of December 31, 2013 (in thousands):

         
Less than
               
After
 
   
Total
   
1 year
   
1-3 Years
   
4 -5 Years
   
5 Years
 
Long-term debt obligations (a)
  $ 186,956     $ 186,956     $ -     $ -     $ -  
Interest on long-term debt
    1,753       1,753       -       -       -  
Operating lease obligations
    75,214       26,497       31,323       12,991       4,403  
Purchase obligations (b)
    41,758       41,758       -       -       -  
Other long-term obligations (c)
    51,671       -       4,661       4,662       42,348  
Total contractual cash obligations
  $ 357,352     $ 256,964     $ 35,984     $ 17,653     $ 46,751  
                                         
(a) Represents the face value of the obligation.
 
(b) Purchase obligations primarily consist of accounts payable at December 31, 2013.
 
(c) Other long-term obligations comprise largely excess benefit obligations.
 

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2013 Versus 2012 – Consolidated Results
Set forth below are the year-to-year changes in the components of the statement of operations relating to income for 2013 versus 2012 (in thousands, except percentages):
 
   
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Service revenues and sales
           
VITAS
  $ (21,924 )     (2 ) %
Roto-Rooter
    5,210       1  
    Total
    (16,714 )     (1 )
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    24,513       2  
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (3,862 )     (2 )
Depreciation
    (1,689 )     (6 )
Amortization
    (178 )     (4 )
Other operating expenses
    (25,095 )     (2,229 )
Income from operations
    (23,025 )     (15 )
Interest expense
    (312 )     (2 )
Other income - net
    1,347       33  
Income before income taxes
    (21,990 )     (15 )
Income taxes
    9,913       18  
Net income
  $ (12,077 )     (14 )
 
 
93

 
 
The VITAS segment revenue decrease is the result of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Routine homecare
  $ 12,959       2 %
Continuous care
    (16,654 )     (10 )
General inpatient
    (9,526 )     (8 )
Medicare cap
    (8,703 )     (511 )
    $ (21,924 )     (2 )

The decrease in VITAS’ revenue from 2012 to 2013 was a result of increased ADC of 1.7%, offset by a Medicare reimbursement rate decrease and level of car mix shift.  For 2013, VITAS recorded a net Medicare cap charge of $7.0 million related to eliminating the Medicare Cap billing limitation recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 offset by two programs’ projected Medicare Cap liability.  This compares to $1.7 million in additional revenue recorded in 2012.  The ADC increase was driven by a 2.4% increase in routine homecare offset by a decrease of 8.2% in continuous care and a 5.2% decrease in general inpatient.  ADC is a key measure we use to monitor volume growth in our hospice programs.  Changes in total program admissions, discharges and average length of stay for our patients are the main drivers of changes in ADC.
 
The Roto-Rooter segment revenue increase is the result of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Plumbing
  $ (308 )     - %
Sewer and drain cleaning
    2,783       2  
Contractor operations
    4,508       16  
HVAC operations
    (1,109 )     (100 )
Other
    (664 )     (3 )
    $ 5,210       1  

Plumbing revenues for 2013 were essentially flat compared to 2012 due to a 1.8% decrease in the number of jobs performed offset by a 1.7% increase in the average price per job.   Sewer and drain cleaning revenues increased from 2012 as a result of a 4.2% increase in average price per job offset by a 1.4% decrease in the number of jobs performed.  Contractor operations revenue increased 15.8% as a result of performance by recent acquisitions and higher job count. HVAC operations decreased as a result of the shut-down of Roto-Rooter’s one remaining HVAC operation, as discussed in Footnote 21.
 
The consolidated gross margin was 28.6% in 2013 versus 27.7% in 2012.  On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin was 22.2% in 2013 and 22.1% in 2012.  Roto-Rooter’s gross margin was 47.0% in 2013 and 44.4% in 2012.  The increase in Roto-Rooter’s gross margin is the result of higher revenue, lower healthcare and casualty insurance costs and reduced field operating expenses.
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) for 2013 comprise (in thousands):

   
2013
   
2012
 
SG&A expenses before long-term incentive
           
    compensation, OIG expenses and the impact
           
    of market gains of deferred compensation plans
  $ 204,086     $ 203,585  
Long-term incentive compensation
    1,301       360  
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    2,149       1,212  
Impact of market value gains on liabilities
               
    held in deferred compensation trusts
    4,982       3,499  
     Total SG&A expenses
  $ 212,518     $ 208,656  

Depreciation expense increased $1.7 million (6.5%) in 2013 mainly due to an increase in capital expenditures in the prior year.
 
 
94

 
 
Other operating expenses comprise (in thousands):

   
2013
   
2012
 
             
Litigation settlement of VITAS segment (a)
  $ 10,500     $ -  
Settlements of Roto-Rooter segment (b)
    15,721       -  
Severance and other operating costs related
               
to closing Roto-Rooter's HVAC business
    -       1,126  
Total other operating expenses
  $ 26,221     $ 1,126  

(a)   
Santos claims discussed in Note 10.
(b)   
Morangelli claims discussed in Note 10 and estimated settlement of certain customer claims.
 
Interest expense increased $312,000 (2.1%) from 2012 to 2013 primarily as a result of the increase in amortization of bond discount expense and the loss on extinguishment of debt resulting from the replacement of the previous Credit Agreement in January 2013.

Other income-net for 2013 and 2012 comprise (in thousands):
   
2013
   
2012
 
Market value gains on assets held in deferred
           
   compensation trusts
  $ 4,982     $ 3,499  
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    (320 )     (347 )
Interest income
    847       809  
Other
    (39 )     162  
     Total other income
  $ 5,470     $ 4,123  

Our effective tax rate was 37.6% in 2013 compared to 38.8% for 2012.  This is a result of a $1.8 million credit related to the expiration of tax statutes for uncertain tax positions recorded in prior years.

Net income for both periods include the following aftertax adjustments that increased/ (reduced) aftertax earnings (in thousands):

   
2013
   
2012
 
VITAS
           
Costs associated with the OIG investigation
  $ (1,333 )   $ (752 )
Litigation settlements
    (6,510 )     -  
Acquisition expense
    (36 )     (9 )
Roto-Rooter
               
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    (865 )     (617 )
Litigation settlements
    (9,551 )     -  
Acquisition expense
    (2 )     (105 )
Expenses of severance arrangements
    (184 )     -  
Costs to shut down HVAC operations
    -       (649 )
Corporate
               
Long-term incentive compensation
    (822 )     (228 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting of convertible debt
    (5,448 )     (5,041 )
Costs related to securities litigation
    (69 )     (469 )
Stock option expense
    (3,813 )     (5,143 )
Uncertain tax position adjustments
    1,782       -  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    (294 )     -  
Total
  $ (27,145 )   $ (13,013 )

 
95

 

2013 Versus 2012 – Segment Results
The change in net income for 2013 versus 2012 is due to (in thousands, except percentages):
 
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
VITAS
  $ (10,433 )     (12 ) %
Roto-Rooter
    (1,662 )     (5 )
Corporate
    18       -  
    $ (12,077 )     (14 )

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
2012 Versus 2011 – Consolidated Results
Set forth below are the year-to-year changes in the components of the statement of income for 2012 versus 2011 (in thousands, except percentages):

   
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Service revenues and sales
           
VITAS
  $ 80,765       8 %
Roto-Rooter
    (6,692 )     (2 )
    Total
    74,073       6  
Cost of services provided and goods sold
    (62,837 )     (6 )
Selling, general and administrative expenses
    (6,396 )     (3 )
Depreciation
    (762 )     (3 )
Amortization
    (260 )     (6 )
Other operating expenses
    (1,126 )     -  
Income from operations
    2,692       2  
Interest expense
    (835 )     (6 )
Other income - net
    3,406       475  
Income before income taxes
    5,263       4  
Income taxes
    (1,938 )     (4 )
Net income
  $ 3,325       4  

The VITAS segment revenue increase is the result of the following (dollars in thousands):
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Routine homecare
  $ 60,118       8 %
Continuous care
    13,597       9  
General inpatient
    3,752       3  
Medicare cap
    3,298       207  
    $ 80,765       8  

The increase in VITAS’ revenue from 2011 to 2012 was a result of increased ADC of 5.5% driven by an increase in admissions of 6.0%, increased discharges of 4.6% and Medicare price increases of approximately 2.5%.  The ADC increase was driven by a 5.6% increase in routine homecare, an increase of 5.6% in continuous care, and a 2.9% increase in general inpatient.  ADC is a key measure we use to monitor volume growth in our hospice programs.  Changes in total program admissions, discharges and average length of stay for our patients are the main drivers of changes in ADC.  The Medicare cap amount recorded in 2012 relates to the reversal of $2,578,000, net of Medicare cap liability for the 2012 measurement period recorded in the fourth quarter of 2011 offset by $873,000 in Medicare cap liability for three programs’ projected 2013 measurement period liability.
 
 
96

 
 
The Roto-Rooter segment revenue decrease is the result of the following (dollars in thousands):

   
Amount
   
Percent
 
Plumbing
  $ (5,053 )     (3 ) %
Sewer and drain cleaning
    (432 )     -  
Contractor operations
    1,811       7  
HVAC operations
    (2,301 )     (67 )
Other
    (717 )     (3 )
    $ (6,692 )     (2 )

Plumbing revenues for 2012 decreased from 2011 due to a 1.8% decrease in the number of jobs performed and a  0.04% decrease in the average price per job.  Sewer and drain cleaning revenues for 2012 were flat over 2011 due to a 4.1% increase in the average price per job offset by a 3.9% decrease in the number of jobs performed.  Contractor operations revenue increased 6.8% as a result of performance by recent acquisitions and higher job count.  HVAC operations decreased as a result of the shut-down of Roto-Rooter’s one remaining HVAC operation, as discussed in Footnote 21.
 
The consolidated gross margin was 27.7% in 2012 versus 28.4% in 2011.  On a segment basis, VITAS’ gross margin was 22.1% in 2012 and 22.3% in 2011.  Roto-Rooter’s gross margin was 44.4% in 2012 and 44.9% in 2011.  The decrease in Roto-Rooter’s gross margin is primarily the result of increased medical costs combined with lower revenue.
 
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) for 2012 comprise (in thousands):

   
2012
   
2011
 
SG&A expenses before long-term incentive
           
    compensation, OIG expenses and the impact
           
    of market gains of deferred compensation plans
  $ 204,045     $ 197,712  
Long-term incentive compensation
    360       3,012  
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    752       737  
Impact of market value gains on liabilities
               
    held in deferred compensation trusts
    3,499       799  
     Total SG&A expenses
  $ 208,656     $ 202,260  

Normal salary increases and revenue related expenses between periods account for the 3.2% increase in SG&A expenses before long-term incentive compensation, OIG expenses and the impact of market gains of deferred compensation plans

Depreciation expense increased $762,000 (3.0%) in 2012 mainly due to an increase in capital expenditures.

Interest expense increased $835,000 (6.0%) from 2011 to 2012 primarily as a result of the increase in amortization of bond discount expense.

 Other income-net for 2012 and 2011 comprise (in thousands):
 
   
2012
   
2011
 
Market value gains on assets held in deferred
           
   compensation trusts
  $ 3,499     $ 799  
Loss on disposal of property and equipment
    (347 )     (441 )
Interest income
    809       426  
Other
    162       (67 )
     Total other income
  $ 4,123     $ 717  

Our effective tax rate was 38.8% in 2012 which is flat when compared to 2011.

 
97

 
 
Net income for both periods include the following aftertax adjustments that increased/ (reduced) aftertax earnings (in thousands):

   
2012
   
2011
 
VITAS
           
Costs associated with the OIG investigation
  $ (752 )   $ (737 )
Acquisition expense
    (9 )     (91 )
Roto-Rooter
               
Costs related to litigation settlements
    (617 )     (1,397 )
Acquisition expense
    (105 )     16  
Costs to shut down HVAC operations
    (649 )     -  
Corporate
               
Long-term incentive compensation
    (228 )     (1,880 )
Noncash impact of change in accounting of convertible debt
    (5,041 )     (4,664 )
Costs related to securities litigation
    (469 )     -  
Stock option expense
    (5,143 )     (5,298 )
Total
  $ (13,013 )   $ (14,051 )

2012 Versus 2011 – Segment Results
The change in net income for 2012 versus 2011 is due to (in thousands, except percentages):
 
   
Increase/(Decrease)
 
   
Amount
   
Percent
 
VITAS
  $ 6,219       8 %
Roto-Rooter
    (3,974 )     (11 )
Corporate
    1,080       4  
    $ 3,325       4  

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Revenue Recognition
For both the Roto-Rooter and VITAS segments, service revenues and sales are recognized when the earnings process has been completed.  Generally, this occurs when services are provided or products are delivered. Sales of Roto-Rooter products, including drain cleaning machines and drain cleaning solution, comprise less than 3% of our total service revenues and sales for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013.

VITAS recognizes revenue at the estimated net realizable amount due from third-party payers, which are primarily Medicare and Medicaid.  Payers may deny payment for services in whole or in part on the basis that such services are not eligible for coverage and do not qualify for reimbursement.  We estimate denials each period and make adequate provision in the financial statements.  The estimate of denials is based on historical trends and known circumstances and generally does not vary materially from period to period on an aggregate basis.  Medicare billings are subject to certain limitations, as described below.

VITAS is subject to certain limitations on Medicare payments for services.  Specifically, if the number of inpatient care days any hospice program provides to Medicare beneficiaries exceeds 20% of the total days of Medicare hospice care such program provides to all patients for an annual period beginning September 28, the days in excess of the 20% figure may be reimbursed only at the routine homecare rate.  We have never had a program reach the inpatient cap.  The majority of our programs have expected cushion in excess of 75% of the inpatient cap for the 2013 measurement period.  Due to the significant cushion at each program, we do not anticipate it to be reasonably likely that any program will be subject to the inpatient cap in the foreseeable future.
 
VITAS is also subject to a Medicare annual per-beneficiary cap.  Compliance with the Medicare cap is measured in one of two ways based on a provider by provider election.  The “stream lined” method compares the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by that Medicare provider number between November 1 of each year and October 31 of the following year with the product of the per-beneficiary cap amount and the number of Medicare beneficiaries electing hospice care for the first time from that hospice program or programs during the relevant period.

 
98

 
 
The “proportional” method compares the total Medicare payments received under a Medicare provider number with respect to services provided to all Medicare hospice care beneficiaries in the program or programs covered by the Medicare provider number between September 28 and September 27 of the following year with the product of the per beneficiary cap amount and a pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries receiving hospice services from that program during the same period.  The pro-rated number of Medicare beneficiaries is calculated based on the ratio of days the beneficiary received hospice services during the measurement period to the total number of days the beneficiary received hospice services.
 
We actively monitor each of our hospice programs, by provider number, as to their specific admissions, discharge rate and median length of stay data in an attempt to determine whether they are likely to exceed the Medicare cap.  Should we determine that a provider number is likely to exceed the Medicare cap based on projected trends, we attempt to institute corrective action to influence the patient mix or to increase patient admissions.  However, should we project our corrective action will not prevent that program from exceeding its Medicare cap, we estimate the amount of revenue recognized during the period that will require repayment to the Federal government under the Medicare cap and record that amount as a reduction in service revenue.
 
Our estimate of the Medicare cap liability is particularly sensitive to allocations made by our fiscal intermediary relative to patient transfers between hospices.  We are allocated a percentage of the Medicare cap based on the total days a patient spent in hospice care.  The allocation for patient transfers cannot be determined until a patient dies.  As the number of days a patient spends in hospice is based on a future event, this allocation process may take several years.  If the actual relationship of transfers in and transfers out for a given measurement period proves to be different for any program at or near a billing limitation, our estimate of the liability would increase or decrease on a dollar-for-dollar basis.  While our method has historically been materially accurate, each program can vary during a given measurement period.
 
During the year ended December 31, 2013, we reversed Medicare cap liability for amounts recorded in the fourth quarter of 2012 for three programs’ projected 2013 measurement period liability. During 2013 this reversal was offset by the Medicare cap liability for two programs’ projected 2014 measurement period liability.  For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded pretax charges in continuing operations for the estimated Medicare cap liability for three programs’ projected liability through year end for the 2013 measurement period.  This amount was subsequently reversed during the 2013 fiscal year due to increased admission.  Shown below is the Medicare cap liability activity for the years end December 31, 2013 and 2012 (in thousands):

   
2013
   
2012
 
Beginning Balance January 1,
  $ 1,261     $ 2,965  
2014 measurement period
    3,881       -  
2013 measurement period
    3,181       874  
2012 measurement period
    -       (2,578 )
2010 measurement period
    (63 )     -  
Ending Balance December 31,
  $ 8,260     $ 1,261  

Insurance Accruals
For the Roto-Rooter segment and Chemed’s Corporate Office, we self-insure for all casualty insurance claims (workers’ compensation, auto liability and general liability).  As a result, we closely monitor and frequently evaluate our historical claims experience to estimate the appropriate level of accrual for self-insured claims.  Our third-party administrator (“TPA”) processes and reviews claims on a monthly basis.  Currently, our exposure on any single claim is capped at $750,000.  In developing our estimates, we accumulate historical claims data for the previous 10 years to calculate loss development factors (“LDF”) by insurance coverage type.  LDFs are applied to known claims to estimate the ultimate potential liability for known and unknown claims for each open policy year.  LDFs are updated annually.  Because this methodology relies heavily on historical claims data, the key risk is whether the historical claims are an accurate predictor of future claims exposure.  The risk also exists that certain claims have been incurred and not reported on a timely basis.  To mitigate these risks, in conjunction with our TPA, we closely monitor claims to ensure timely accumulation of data and compare claims trends with the industry experience of our TPA.

For the VITAS segment, we self-insure for workers’ compensation claims.  Currently, VITAS’ exposure on any single claim is capped at $1,000,000.  For VITAS’ self-insurance accruals for workers’ compensation, the valuation methods used are similar to those used internally for our other business units.

Our casualty insurance liabilities are recorded gross before any estimated recovery for amounts exceeding our stop loss limits.  Estimated recoveries from insurance carriers are recorded as accounts receivable.  Claims experience adjustments to our casualty and workers’ compensation accrual for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were net, pretax debits/(credits) of ($1,487,000),  ($790,000) and ($17,000) respectively.
 
 
99

 
 
As an indication of the sensitivity of the accrued liability to reported claims, our analysis indicates that a 1% across-the-board increase or decrease in the amount of projected losses would increase or decrease the accrued insurance liability at December 31, 2013, by $2.4 million or 5.8%.  While the amount recorded represents our best estimate of the casualty and workers’ compensation insurance liability, we have calculated, based on historical claims experience, the actual loss could reasonably be expected to increase or decrease by approximately $3.0 million as of December 31, 2013.

Income Taxes
Deferred taxes are provided on an asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry-forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.  Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amount of assets and liabilities and their tax basis.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in our opinion, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized due to insufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward period available under the tax laws. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in laws and rates on the date of enactment.
 
We are subject to income taxes in the federal and most state jurisdictions.  We are periodically audited by various taxing authorities.  Significant judgment is required to determine our provision for income taxes.  We adopted FASB’s authoritative guidance on accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, which prescribes a comprehensive model for how to recognize, measure, present and disclose in financial statements uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken on a tax return.  Upon adoption of this guidance, the financial statements reflect expected future tax consequences of such uncertain positions assuming the taxing authorities’ full knowledge of the position and all relevant facts.

Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Identifiable, definite-lived intangible assets arise from purchase business combinations and are amortized using either an accelerated method or the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets.  The selection of an amortization method is based on which method best reflects the economic pattern of usage of the asset.
 
The date of our annual goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment analysis is October 1.  The VITAS trade name is considered to have an indefinite life.  We also capitalize the direct costs of obtaining licenses to operate either hospice programs or plumbing operations subject to a minimum capitalization threshold.  These costs are amortized over the life of the license using the straight line method.  Certificates of Need (CON), which are required in certain states for hospice operations, are generally granted without expiration and thus, we believe them to be indefinite-lived assets subject to impairment testing.
 
We consider that RRC, RRSC and VITAS are appropriate reporting units for testing goodwill impairment.  We consider RRC and RRSC as separate reporting units but one operating segment.  This is appropriate as they each have their own set of general ledger accounts that can be analyzed at “one level below an operating segment” per the definition of a reporting unit in FASB guidance.
 
In July 2012, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update “ASU” No. 2012-02 – Intangibles Goodwill and Other which provides additional guidance related to the impairment testing of indefinite-lived intangible assets.  ASU No. 2012–02 allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is necessary to perform further impairment testing.  The revised guidance was effective for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012 but early adoption was permitted.  Our impairment testing date is October 1 of each year and we adopted the new guidelines in the third quarter of 2012
 
We completed our qualitative analysis for impairment of goodwill and our indefinite-lived intangible assets as of October 1, 2013.  Based on our assessment, we do not believe that it is more likely than not that our reporting units’ or indefinite-lived assets fair values are less than their carrying values.

Stock-based Compensation Plans
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date, based on the fair value of the award and recognized as expense over the employee’s requisite service period on a straight-line basis. We estimate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes valuation model.  We estimate the fair value and derived service periods of market based awards using a Monte Carlo simulation approach in a risk neutral framework.  We determine expected term, volatility, dividend yield and forfeiture rate based on our historical experience.  We believe that historical experience is the best indicator of these factors.

 
100

 
 
Contingencies
We are subject to various lawsuits and claims in the normal course of our business.  In addition, we periodically receive communications from governmental and regulatory agencies concerning compliance with Medicare and Medicaid billing requirements at our VITAS subsidiary.  We establish reserves for specific, uninsured liabilities in connection with regulatory and legal action that we deem to be probable and estimable.  We record legal fees associated with legal and regulatory actions as the costs are incurred.  We disclose material loss contingencies that probable but not reasonably estimable and those that are at least reasonably possible.
 
 
 
 
101

 
 
Consolidating Summary of Adjusted EBITDA
 
                         
Chemed Corporation and Subsidiary Companies
 
(in thousands)
                    Chemed  
2013  
VITAS
   
Roto-Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
                         
Net income/(loss)
  $ 76,144     $ 29,243     $ (28,160 )   $ 77,227  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Interest expense
    182       322       14,531       15,035  
Income taxes
    46,910       17,560       (17,868 )     46,602  
Depreciation
    18,149       9,014       535       27,698  
Amortization
    2,102       607       1,981       4,690  
EBITDA
    143,487       56,746       (28,981 )     171,252  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Intercompany interest/(expense)
    (4,288 )     (2,055 )     6,343       -  
Interest income
    (750 )     (41 )     (56 )     (847 )
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    2,149       -       -       2,149  
Acquisition expenses
    58       4       -       62  
Litigation Settlement
    10,500       15,721       -       26,221  
Expenses related to litigation settlements
    -       1,425       -       1,425  
Advertising cost adjustment
    -       (1,166 )     -       (1,166 )
Expenses of severance arrangements
    -       302       -       302  
Stock option expense
    -       -       6,042       6,042  
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       1,301       1,301  
Expenses related to securities litigation
    -       -       109       109  
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 151,156     $ 70,936     $ (15,242 )   $ 206,850  
                                 
                           
Chemed
 
2012   
VITAS
   
Roto-Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
                                 
Net income/(loss)
  $ 86,577     $ 30,905     $ (28,178 )   $ 89,304  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Interest expense
    233       433       14,057       14,723  
Income taxes
    53,092       18,770       (15,347 )     56,515  
Depreciation
    17,087       8,397       525       26,009  
Amortization
    1,956       632       1,924       4,512  
EBITDA
    158,945       59,137       (27,019 )     191,063  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Intercompany interest/(expense)
    (3,180 )     (1,617 )     4,797       -  
Interest income
    (703 )     (30 )     (76 )     (809 )
Legal expenses of OIG investigation
    1,212       -       -       1,212  
Acquisition expenses
    15       173       -       188  
Expenses of securities litigation
    -       -       742       742  
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       360       360  
Expenses of class action litigation
    -       1,016       -       1,016  
Cost to shut down HVAC operations
    -       1,126       -       1,126  
Stock option expense
    -       -       8,130       8,130  
Advertising cost adjustment
    -       (1,573 )     -       (1,573 )
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 156,289     $ 58,232     $ (13,066 )   $ 201,455  
                                 
                           
Chemed
 
2011  
VITAS
   
Roto-Rooter
   
Corporate
   
Consolidated
 
                                 
Net income/(loss)
  $ 80,358     $ 34,879     $ (29,258 )   $ 85,979  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Interest expense
    229       358       13,301       13,888  
Income taxes
    48,835       21,353       (15,611 )     54,577  
Depreciation
    16,583       8,130       534       25,247  
Amortization
    1,897       599       1,756       4,252  
EBITDA
    147,902       65,319       (29,278 )     183,943  
Add/(deduct):
                               
Intercompany interest/(expense)
    (3,998 )     (2,136 )     6,134       -  
Interest income
    (295 )     (40 )     (91 )     (426 )
Legal expenses of OIG investigation
    1,188       -       -       1,188  
Long-term incentive compensation
    -       -       3,012       3,012  
Expenses of class action litigation
    -       2,299       -       2,299  
Acquisition expenses
    147       (26 )     -       121  
Stock option expense
    -       -       8,376       8,376  
Advertising cost adjustment
    -       (1,240 )     -       (1,240 )
Adjusted EBITDA
  $ 144,944     $ 64,176     $ (11,847 )   $ 197,273  
 
 
102

 

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
RECONCILIATION OF ADJUSTED NET INCOME
 
(in thousands, except per share data)(unaudited)
 
                   
   
For the Years Ended December 31,
 
   
2013
   
2012
   
2011
 
Net income as reported
  $ 77,227     $ 89,304     $ 85,979  
                         
Add/(deduct) after-tax cost of:
                       
Non-cash expense of change in accounting for convertible
    5,448       5,041       4,664  
Stock option expense
    3,813       5,143       5,298  
Expenses related to OIG investigation
    1,333       752       737  
Expenses realated to litigation settlements
    865       617       1,397  
Long-term incentive compensation
    822       228       1,880  
Expenses related to securities litigation
    69       469       -  
Acquisition expenses
    38       114       75  
Litigation settlements
    16,061       -       -  
Uncertain tax position adjustments
    (1,782 )     -       -  
Loss on extinguishment of debt
    294       -       -  
Expenses of severance arrangements
    184       -       -  
Expenses to shut down HVAC operations
    -       649       -  
Adjusted net income
  $ 104,372     $ 102,317     $ 100,030  
                         
Earnings Per Share As Reported
                       
Net income
  $ 4.24     $ 4.72     $ 4.19  
Average number of shares outstanding
    18,199       18,924       20,523  
Diluted Earnings Per Share As Reported
                       
Net income
  $ 4.16     $ 4.62     $ 4.10  
Average number of shares outstanding
    18,585       19,339       20,945  
                         
                         
Adjusted Earnings Per Share
                       
Net income
  $ 5.74     $ 5.41     $ 4.87  
Average number of shares outstanding
    18,199       18,924       20,523  
Adjusted Diluted Earnings Per Share
                       
Net income
  $ 5.62     $ 5.29     $ 4.78  
Average number of shares outstanding
    18,585       19,339       20,945  
                         
The "Footnotes to Financial Statements" are integral parts of this financial information.
 

 
103

 

CHEMED CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARY COMPANIES
 
OPERATING STATISTICS FOR VITAS SEGMENT
 
(unaudited)
 
                         
   
Three Months Ended December 31,
   
Year Ended December 31,
 
OPERATING STATISTICS
 
2013
   
2012
   
2013
   
2012
 
Net revenue ($000)
                       
Homecare
  $ 198,325     $ 201,266     $ 791,735     $ 778,776  
Inpatient
    25,788       28,013       104,968       114,494  
Continuous care
    35,943       44,581       155,409       172,063  
Total before Medicare cap allowance
  $ 260,056     $ 273,860     $ 1,052,112     $ 1,065,333  
Medicare cap allowance
    (3,838 )     (873 )     (6,999 )     1,704  
Total
  $ 256,218     $ 272,987     $ 1,045,113     $ 1,067,037  
Net revenue as a percent of total
                               
     before Medicare cap allowance
                               
Homecare
    76.3 %     73.5 %     75.2 %     73.1 %
Inpatient
    9.9       10.2       10.0       10.7  
Continuous care
    13.8       16.3       14.8       16.2  
Total before Medicare cap allowance
    100.0       100.0       100.0       100.0  
Medicare cap allowance
    (1.5 )     (0.3 )     (0.7 )     0.2  
Total
    98.5 %     99.7 %     99.3 %     100.2 %
Average daily census (days)
                               
Homecare
    10,353       10,352       10,449       10,016  
Nursing home
    2,862       3,007       2,911       3,025  
Routine homecare
    13,215       13,359       13,360       13,041  
Inpatient
    433       451       438       462  
Continuous care
    537       655       585       637  
Total
    14,185       14,465       14,383       14,140  
                                 
Total Admissions
    15,445       16,004       62,858       63,777  
Total Discharges
    15,396       16,120       62,999       63,196  
Average length of stay (days)
    82.6       80.3       81.6       78.8  
Median length of stay (days)
    15.0       15.0       15.0       15.0  
ADC by major diagnosis
                               
Neurological
    38.9 %     33.9 %     37.7 %     34.2 %
Cancer
    17.2       17.2       17.1       17.5  
Cardio
    14.3       11.1       13.2       11.3  
Respiratory
    7.8       6.5       7.6       6.6  
Other
    21.8       31.3       24.4       30.4  
Total
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Admissions by major diagnosis
                               
Neurological
    21.3 %     18.5 %     20.7 %     19.1 %
Cancer
    33.8       33.3       33.2       33.3  
Cardio
    13.4       11.3       13.1       11.1  
Respiratory
    8.7       8.3       9.2       8.2  
Other
    22.8       28.6       23.8       28.3  
Total
    100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %     100.0 %
Direct patient care margins
                               
Routine homecare
    53.8 %     54.4 %     52.6 %     52.5 %
Inpatient
    5.0       10.5       5.5       11.6  
Continuous care
    16.1       18.3       15.9       19.2  
Homecare margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
                               
Labor costs
  $ 53.85     $ 53.28     $ 55.17     $ 55.03  
Drug costs
    7.54       7.61       7.54       8.09  
Home medical equipment
    6.38       6.68       6.61       6.83  
Medical supplies
    2.99       2.78       2.97       2.77  
Inpatient margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
                               
Labor costs
  $ 334.50     $ 330.20     $ 338.51     $ 323.09  
Continuous care margin drivers (dollars per patient day)
                               
Labor costs
  $ 589.51     $ 583.46     $ 591.54     $ 574.64  
Bad debt expense as a percent of revenues
    0.9 %     0.6 %     0.9 %     0.8 %
Accounts receivable --
                               
Days of revenue outstanding- excluding unapplied Medicare payments
    36.5       35.9    
N.A.
   
N.A.
 
Days of revenue outstanding- including unapplied Medicare payments
    25.9       25.2    
N.A.
   
N.A.
 
 
 
104

 

SAFE HARBOR STATEMENT UNDER THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995 REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
In addition to historical information, this report contains forward-looking statements and performance trends that are based upon assumptions subject to certain known and unknown risks, uncertainties, contingencies and other factors. Such forward-looking statements and trends include, but are not limited to, the impact of laws and regulations on our operations, our estimate of future effective income tax rates and the recoverability of deferred tax assets. Variances in any or all of the risks, uncertainties, contingencies, and other factors from our assumptions could cause actual results to differ materially from these forward-looking statements and trends. Our ability to deal with the unknown outcomes of these events, many of which are beyond our control, may affect the reliability of our projections and other financial matters.
 


105