EX-99.13 14 exhibit9913.htm FISCAL 2016 CONSOLIDATED PROJECTIONS exhibit9913.htm Exhibit 99.13

The following is the consolidated estimated (projected) results of operations of the Company’s 2016 fiscal year as presented to Chaffe and Associates for the valuation of the Company’s common stock. The information disclosed below is in a summarized and consolidated format that is similar to the format in which the Company reports financial information to the public and its shareholders.
 
This exhibit includes “forward-looking” information statements, as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including projected performance and income. Actual results may differ from those provided in the forward-looking statements. The projections are subject to various conditions and may not occur. Even if these events do occur, the ultimate results may differ substantially.

 

 




 
 
Champion Industries, Inc. and Subsidiaries
Projected Consolidated Statements of Operations

 Projections for the Year Ended October 31, 2016 (1)
     
 Revenues $ 65,066,631  
       
Cost of sales   49,354,537  
       
Gross profit   15,712,094  
       
Selling, general and administrative expenses   14,723,000  
       
Income from operations   989,094  
       
Other income (expenses)   (566,000 )
       
Income before income taxes   423,094  
Income tax benefit (2)   857,691  
       
Net income $ 1,280,785  
       
 
(1) These projections were based on historical performance and trends for each of the Company's operating divisions with adjustments made for known and unknown events that the Company expects to occur in 2016. The Company or its management give no assurance that these results will materialize.
 
(2) At the time completed, this was the estimated net result of reversing the valuation allowance the Company carries against its net deferred tax assets. This assumption is based on a profitable fiscal 2016 that would indicate the ability to generate sufficient future income to utilize such tax assets. Actual results and tax valuation allowance reversals could differ significantly.
 
 
2