As filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on August 15, 2022.

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of registrant’s principal executive offices)

(Name, address, including zip code, and telephone number, including area code, of agent for service)

Approximate date of commencement of proposed sale to the public: As soon as practicable after the effective date of this Registration Statement.

If any of the securities being registered on this form are to be offered on a delayed or continuous basis pursuant to Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933 check the following box. x

If this Form is filed to register additional securities for an offering pursuant to Rule 462(b) under the Securities Act, please check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(c) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration statement number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

If this Form is a post-effective amendment filed pursuant to Rule 462(d) under the Securities Act, check the following box and list the Securities Act registration number of the earlier effective registration statement for the same offering. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting ¨

The Registrant hereby amends this Registration Statement on such date or dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment which specifically states that this Registration Statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or until the Registration Statement shall become effective on such date as the Securities and Exchange Commission, acting pursuant to said Section 8(a), may determine.

The information in this preliminary prospectus is not complete and may be changed. Neither we nor the selling security holders may sell these securities until the registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission is effective. This preliminary prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities, and it is not soliciting offers to buy these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

Up to 909,091 Shares of Class Common Stock Issuable Upon Exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants

Up to 2,040,170 Shares of Class Common Stock Issuable Upon Exercise of the Preferred Investment Options

This prospectus relates to the offer and resale from time to time by the selling securityholders named in this prospectus (the “Selling Shareholders”) of shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 per share (“Common Stock”) of Nuvectis Pharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Nuvectis”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” or “our) consisting of (i) up to: 1,015,598 shares of our Common Stock issued in connection with our private placement offering (the “Shares”); (ii) up to 2,040,170 shares of Common Stock that may be obtained upon the exercise of preferred investment options to purchase shares of Common Stock (the “Investment Options”); and (iii) up to 909,091 pre-funded warrants to purchase shares of Common Stock issued in a private placement (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”).

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of the securities under this prospectus, although we could receive up to $19,765,056 upon the exercise of all of the Investment Options and Pre-Funded Warrants. Any amounts we receive from such exercises will be used for working capital and other general corporate purposes.

Information regarding the Selling Shareholders, the amounts of shares of Common Stock that may be sold by them and the times and manner in which they may offer and sell the shares of common stock under this prospectus is provided under the sections titled “Selling Shareholders” and “Plan of Distribution,” respectively, in this prospectus. We have not been informed by any of the Selling Shareholders that they intend to sell the common stock covered by this prospectus and do not know when or in what amount the Selling Shareholders may offer the common stock for sale. The Selling Shareholders may sell any, all, or none of the common stock offered by this prospectus.

Our Common Stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “NVCT”. On August 12, 2022, the last reported sale price of our common stock was $8.71 per share.

We are an “emerging growth company” and a “smaller reporting company” as defined under the U.S. federal securities laws and, as such, have elected to comply with certain reduced reporting requirements.

Investing in our common stock involves a high degree of risk. See “Risk factors” beginning on page 8.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any other state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this prospectus. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus. We have not authorized any dealer, salesperson or other person to provide you with information concerning us, except for the information contained in this prospectus. The information contained in this prospectus is complete and accurate only as of the date on the front cover page of this prospectus, regardless of the time of delivery of this prospectus or the sale of any securities. This prospectus is not an offer to sell these securities and we are not soliciting an offer to buy these securities in any state where the offer or sale is not permitted.

In this prospectus, unless the context suggests otherwise, references to “Nuvectis Pharma,” “Nuvectis,” the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to Nuvectis Pharma, Inc.

This prospectus is part of a registration statement on Form S-1 that we filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Under this registration process, the Selling Shareholders may, from time to time, sell the securities offered by them described in this prospectus through any means described in the section titled “Plan of Distribution”. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale by such Selling Holders of the securities offered by them described in this prospectus. This prospectus also relates to the issuance by us of the shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of any Investment Option or Pre-Funded Warrant. We will receive proceeds from any exercise of the Investment Options and Pre-Funded Warrants for cash.

Neither we nor the Selling Shareholders have authorized anyone to provide you with any information or to make any representations other than those contained in this prospectus or any applicable prospectus supplement or any free writing prospectuses prepared by or on behalf of us or to which we have referred you. Neither we nor the Selling Shareholders take responsibility for and can provide no assurance as to the reliability of, any other information that others may give you. Neither we nor the Selling Shareholders will make an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted.

We may also provide a prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment to the registration statement to add information to, or update or change information contained in, this prospectus. Any statement contained in this prospectus will be deemed to be modified or superseded for purposes of this prospectus to the extent that a statement contained in such prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment modifies or supersedes such statement. Any statement so modified will be deemed to constitute a part of this prospectus only as so modified, and any statement so superseded will not be deemed to constitute a part of this prospectus. You should read both this prospectus and any applicable prospectus supplement or post-effective amendment to the registration statement together with the additional information to which we refer you in the section of this prospectus titled “Where You Can Find More Information.”

Prospectus Summary

This summary highlights information contained in greater detail elsewhere in this prospectus and does not contain all of the information that you should consider in making your investment decision. Before investing in our Common Stock, you should carefully read this entire prospectus, including our financial statements and the related notes thereto included elsewhere in this prospectus. You should also consider, among other things, the information set forth under the sections titled “Risk Factors,” “Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements,” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” in each case appearing elsewhere in this prospectus. Unless the context otherwise requires, we use the terms “Nuvectis,” “Nuvectis Pharma,” the “Company,” “we,” “us,” “our” and similar designations in this prospectus to refer to Nuvectis Pharma, Inc. and, where appropriate, our subsidiaries.

Overview

NXP800 (HSF1-Pathway Inhibitor)

We have licensed exclusive world-wide commercial rights to NXP800, a clinical-stage novel Heat Shock Factor 1 (“HSF1”) pathway inhibitor, which was developed at the Institute for Cancer Research (“ICR”) in London, England. Cancer cells actively exploit HSF1 to overcome diverse stresses and promote biological activities crucial for their survival, progression, immune evasion, and metastasis.

In preclinical studies, treatment with NXP800 inhibited tumor growth in xenografts models of human ovarian cancer. In addition, a genetic mutation in the AT-rich interactive domain-containing protein 1A (“ARID1a”) gene has been identified as a potential biomarker for treatment sensitivity and patient selection. Based on this work, we plan to clinically investigate NXP800 in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma (“OCCC”) and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, and to investigate the utility of ARID1a deficiency as a patient selection marker. The genetic screening for the ARID1a mutation is a standard part of the commercially available screening panels being utilized in the clinic for cancer patients.

The ongoing Phase 1 study of NXP800 is comprised of two parts: dose-escalation Phase 1a, initiated in December 2021, to be followed by an expansion Phase 1b. In the Phase 1a, the safety and tolerability of NXP800 is being evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors to identify a dose and dosing schedule for the Phase 1b. In the Phase 1b, the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of NXP800 will be evaluated, initially in patients with OCCC and endometrioid carcinoma and possibly in patients with other types of solid tumors. Additional preclinical studies are currently being conducted to identify development opportunities for NXP800 in additional solid tumor types.

NXP900

NXP900 is a preclinical-stage drug candidate designed to preferentially inhibit the Proto-oncogene c-Src (“SRC”) and YES1 kinases. NXP900 was discovered at the University of Edinburgh. SRC is aberrantly activated in many cancer types, including solid tumors such as breast, colon, prostate, pancreatic and ovarian, while remaining predominantly inactive in non-cancerous cells. Increased SRC activity is generally associated with late-stage cancers, metastatic potential and resistance to therapy, and correlates with poor clinical prognosis. YES1 gene amplification has been reported to be implicated in several tumors including lung, head and neck, bladder and esophageal cancers. Furthermore, it has been found that YES1 gene amplification is a key mechanism of resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (“EGFR”) or (Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (“HER2”) inhibitors. A recent, peer reviewed study published in Nature Communication which was not sponsored by the Company, has shown positive effects of using NXP900 in combination with the leading EFGR inhibitor, Tagrisso, to overcome Tagrisso resistance in Tagrisso-resistant cell lines.

Preclinically, NXP900 has been shown to inhibit SRC and YES1 kinases and substantially inhibit growth of primary tumors and bone metastases in several triple negative breast cancer (“TNBC”) animal models.

We plan to initially develop NXP900 in solid tumors where SRC and/or YES1 are implicated. We anticipate submitting an IND or an equivalent submission with a foreign agency in early 2023.

Since our inception in 2020, we have devoted all of our efforts and financial resources to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring, discovering product candidates and securing related intellectual property rights and conducting research and development activities for our programs. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We may never be able to develop or commercialize a marketable product. We have not yet successfully completed any pivotal clinical trials, obtained any regulatory approvals, manufactured a commercial-scale drug, or conducted sales and marketing activities.

Our strategy is to build a global biopharmaceutical company through the identification, development, and commercialization of therapeutics to address unmet medical needs in oncology with an initial focus on patients with OCCC and endometrioid ovarian cancers. We intend to leverage our core competencies of target selection, drug profiling and clinical and regulatory execution to build a pipeline of product candidates targeting cancers driven by genetic alterations. The key elements driving our business strategy include:

An investment in our Common Stock is subject to a broad range of risks and should only be made after a careful consideration of such risks. For a discussion of some of the risks you should consider before purchasing our Common Stock, you are urged to carefully review and consider the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

Risk Factor Summary

Our business is subject to a number of risks, including risks that may prevent us from achieving our business objectives or may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects that you should consider before making a decision to invest in our Common Stock. These risks are discussed more fully in the section titled “Risk factors” beginning on page 8, of this prospectus include the following:

➢

We have a limited operating history, have not completed any clinical trials to date, have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue, which may make it difficult for investors to evaluate our current business and likelihood of success and viability.

➢

We have incurred losses since our inception and have not generated any revenue. We expect to incur continued losses for the foreseeable future and may never achieve or maintain profitability.

➢

Our ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability depends significantly on our ability to achieve several objectives relating to the discovery or identification, development, regulatory approval and commercialization of our current or future product candidates.

➢

We will require substantial additional capital to finance our operations and achieve our goals. If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on terms acceptable to us, we may be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our research or product development programs, any future commercialization efforts or other operations.

➢

We are substantially dependent on the success of our lead product candidate, NXP800, for which we commenced a Phase 1 clinical trial in December 2021.

➢

Clinical trials are very expensive, time consuming and difficult to design and implement, and involve uncertain outcomes. Furthermore, results of earlier preclinical studies and clinical trials may not be predictive of results of future preclinical studies or clinical trials. Our current or future product candidates may not have favorable results in later clinical trials, if any, or receive regulatory approval.

➢

If we fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to our stakeholders, we may need to terminate development programs, our reputation may be harmed, and our business will suffer.

➢

The COVID-19 pandemic could adversely impact our business, including our clinical trials and clinical trial operations.

➢

The development and commercialization of pharmaceutical products are subject to extensive regulation, and we may not obtain regulatory approvals for NXP800, NXP900, or any future product candidate, on a timely basis or at all.

➢

The manufacture of any of our current or future product candidates is complex. Our third-party manufacturers may encounter difficulties or interruptions in production, which could delay or entirely halt their ability to supply any of our current or future product candidates for clinical trials or, if approved, for commercial sale.

➢

Our future success depends on our ability to retain our executive officers and key employees and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel and manage our human capital.

➢

We currently have 10 full-time employees and we will need to grow the size and capabilities of our organization, and we may experience difficulties in managing this growth.

➢

If we are unable to obtain and maintain patent protection or other necessary rights for our products and technology, or if the scope of the patent protection obtained is not sufficiently broad or our rights under licensed patents is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize products and technology similar or identical to ours, and our ability to successfully commercialize our products and technology may be adversely affected.

Corporate Information

We were incorporated in July 2020 under the laws of the State of Delaware under the name Centry Pharma, Inc., and changed our name to Nuvectis Pharma, Inc. in July 2021. Our principal executive offices are located at 1 Bridge Plaza, 2^nd Floor, Fort Lee, NJ 07024, and our telephone number is (201) 614-3150. Our website address is www.nuvectis.com. The information contained in or accessible from our website is not incorporated into this prospectus, and you should not consider it part of this prospectus. We have included our website address in this prospectus solely as an inactive textual reference.

Implications of being an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company

We qualify as an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, as amended. As an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of specified reduced disclosure and other requirements that are otherwise applicable generally to public companies. These provisions include:

➢

being permitted to only two years of audited financial statements in addition to any required unaudited interim financial statements with correspondingly reduced “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” disclosure in this prospectus;

➢

reduced disclosure about our executive compensation arrangements; and

➢

not being required to hold advisory votes on executive compensation or to obtain stockholder approval of any golden parachute arrangements not previously approved; and an exemption from the auditor attestation requirement in the assessment of our internal control over financial reporting.

We may take advantage of these exemptions for up to five years or such earlier time that we are no longer an emerging growth company.

We would cease to be an emerging growth company on the date that is the earliest of (i) the last day of the fiscal year in which we have total annual gross revenues of $1.07 billion or more; (ii) the last day of our fiscal year following the fifth anniversary of the date of the completion of our initial public offering; (iii) the date on which we have issued more than $1.0 billion in nonconvertible debt during the previous three years; or (iv) the date on which we are deemed to be a large accelerated filer under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). We may choose to take advantage of some but not all of these exemptions. We have taken advantage of reduced reporting requirements in this prospectus. Accordingly, the information contained herein may be different from the information you receive from other public companies in which you hold stock.

We have elected not to “opt out” of the exemption for the delayed adoption of certain accounting standards and, therefore, we will adopt new or revised accounting standards at the time private companies adopt the new or revised accounting standard and will do so until such time that we either (i) irrevocably elect to “opt out” of such extended transition period or (ii) no longer qualify as an emerging growth company.

We are also a “smaller reporting company,” meaning that the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million and our annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company after this offering if either (i) the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million or (ii) our annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million. If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an emerging growth company, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company we may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and, similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.

Private Placement of Shares of Common Stock, Preferred Investment Options, and Pre-Funded Warrants

On July 27, 2022, we entered into definitive agreements for the issuance and sale in a private placement (the “Private Placement”) of 1,015,598 shares of its common stock, par value $0.00001 (the “Common Stock”) and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 909,091 shares of Common Stock at a purchase price of $8.25 per share, referred to as the Pre-Funded Warrants. The investors in the Private Placement also received preferred investment options to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,924,689 shares of Common Stock, referred to as the Investor Investment Options. The Investor Investment Options will have an exercise price of $9.65, will become exercisable commencing six months following the date of issuance and will have a term of three and one-half years from the date of issuance.

The Private Placement closed on July 29, 2022. Gross proceeds to the Company from the Private Placement are approximately $15.9 million. The Company intends to use the net proceeds from the Private Placement for working capital and other general corporate purposes. See “Use of Proceeds.”

In connection with the Private Placement, the Company entered into a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”) with the Selling Shareholders. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, the Company is required to file a resale registration statement (the “Registration Statement”) with the Securities and exchange Commission (the “SEC”) to register for resale of the Shares, the shares issuable upon exercise of the Pre-Funded Warrants and the Investment Options (as defined below) by August 15, 2022. Pursuant to the Registration Rights Agreement, the Registration Statement shall be declared effective within 45 days after July 27, 2022, or in the event of a full review by the SEC, 75 days from July 27, 2022. The Company will be obligated to pay certain liquidated damages to the investor if the Company fails to file the resale registration statement when required, fails to cause the Registration Statement to be declared effective by the SEC when required, of if the Company fails to maintain the effectiveness of the Registration Statement.

H.C. Wainwright & Co. (“Wainwright) acted as the placement agent in connection with the Private Placement. Pursuant to the engagement agreement, Wainwright was paid a cash fee equal to 7% of the gross proceeds and a management fee of 1% of the gross proceeds. The Company also paid Wainwright $85,000 for non-accountable expenses. As part of their compensation, certain designees of Wainwright received preferred investment options to purchase up to an aggregate of 115,481 shares of Common Stock, referred to as the Placement Agent Investment Options (and together with the Investor Investment Options, the “Investment Options”). The Placement Agent Investment Options have an exercise price of $10.3125, per share will become exercisable commencing six months following the date of issuance and have a term of three and one-half years from the date of issuance.

The Offering

Shares of common stock outstanding immediately prior to the Private Placement.		12,717,794

Shares of common stock offered by the Selling Shareholders		Up to 1,015,598 shares

Pre-funded warrants offered by the Selling Shareholders		Up to 909,091 pre-funded warrants

Preferred investment options offered by the Selling Shareholders		Up to 2,040,170 preferred investment options

Use of proceeds		We are not selling any securities under this prospectus and we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of Common Stock by the Selling Shareholders. We will receive up to an aggregate of approximately $19,764,147 from the exercise of the preferred investment options, assuming the exercise in full of all of the preferred investment options. We will receive up to an aggregate of approximately $909 from the exercise of the pre-funded warrants. We intend to use the net proceeds of the Private Placement for working capital and general corporate purposes. See “Use of Proceeds.”

Nasdaq Capital Market symbol		“NVCT”

Risk factors		Investment in our Common Stock involves substantial risks. You should read this prospectus carefully, including the section entitled “Risk Factors” and the financial statements and the related notes to those statements included in this prospectus, before investing in our Common Stock.

The number of shares of our Common Stock outstanding after the Private Placement is based on 14,642,483 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of August 5, 2022, and excludes:

➢

296,590 shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of options outstanding under our 2021 Global Equity Incentive Plan as amended and restated (the “2021 Plan”), at a weighted average exercise price of $3.99 per share as of June 30, 2022;

➢

228,893 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants under the 2021 Plan to purchase Common Stock and underwriter warrants associated with the 2022 IPO at a weighted exercise price of $3.41 per share as of June 30, 2022;

➢

193,557 shares of restricted stock granted to the Company’s three founders on July 27, 2021;

➢

349,580 shares of restricted stock issued under the 2021 Plan;

➢

752,937 shares of Common Stock to be reserved for future issuance under the 2021 Plan; and

➢

2,040,170 shares of Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Investment Options.

Special Note Regarding Forward-looking Statements

Certain matters discussed in this report may constitute forward-looking statements for purposes of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from the future results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. The words “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “could,” “intend,” “target,” “project,” “contemplate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “predict,” “would,” “potential,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “may,” “expect” and similar expressions are generally intended to identify forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are based on management’s current expectations and assumptions about future events, which are inherently subject to uncertainties, risks and changes in circumstances that are difficult to predict.

Our actual results may differ materially from the results anticipated in these forward-looking statements due to a variety of factors, including, without limitation, those discussed under the captions “Risk Factors,” and elsewhere in this report. All written or oral forward-looking statements attributable to us are expressly qualified in their entirety by these cautionary statements. Such forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:

⮚

our expectations for increases or decreases in expenses;

⮚

the success and timing of our clinical trials and preclinical studies, including safety and efficacy of our product candidates, patient accrual, unexpected or expected safety events, and the usability of data generated from our trials;

➢

expectations for incurring capital expenditures to expand our research and development and manufacturing capabilities;

➢

estimates of the sufficiency of our existing cash and cash equivalents and investments to finance our operating requirements, including expectations regarding the value and liquidity of our investments;

➢

expectations for generating revenue or becoming profitable on a sustained basis;

➢

the impact of health epidemics, including the COVID-19 pandemic, on our business and the actions we may take in response thereto;

➢

developments and projections relating to our competitors and industry;

➢

our expectations about how market trends will affect our business;

➢

our and our licensors’ ability to obtain, establish, maintain, protect and enforce intellectual property and proprietary protection for our products and technologies and to avoid claims of infringement, misappropriation or other violation of third-party intellectual property and proprietary rights;

➢

our ability to attract and retain key personnel and to manage our future growth effectively;

➢

expectations for future capital requirements;

➢

the volatility of the trading price of our Common Stock; and

➢

our expectations regarding the period during which we qualify as an emerging growth company under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act.

We have based the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus primarily on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, prospects, business strategy and financial needs. The outcome of the events described in these forward-looking statements is subject to risks, uncertainties, assumptions and other factors described in the section captioned “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus. These risks are not exhaustive. Other sections of this prospectus include additional factors that could adversely impact our business and financial performance. Furthermore, new risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time and it is not possible for us to predict all risks and uncertainties that could have an impact on the forward- looking statements contained in this prospectus. We cannot assure you that the results, events and circumstances reflected in the forward-looking statements will be achieved or occur, and actual results, events or circumstances could differ materially from those described in the forward-looking statements. You should, however, review the factors and risks and other information we describe in the reports we will file from time to time with the SEC after the date of this prospectus. See “Where You Can Find More Information.”

In addition, statements that “we believe” and similar statements reflect our beliefs and opinions on the relevant subject. These statements are based upon information available to us as of the date of this prospectus, and while we believe such information forms a reasonable basis for such statements, such information may be limited or incomplete, and our statements should not be read to indicate that we have conducted an exhaustive inquiry into, or review of, all potentially available relevant information. These statements are inherently uncertain and investors are cautioned not to unduly rely upon these statements.

You should read this prospectus and the documents that we reference in this prospectus and have filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part with the understanding that our actual future results, levels of activity, performance and achievements may be materially different from what we expect. We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.

The forward-looking statements made in this prospectus relate only to events as of the date on which such statements are made. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements after the date of this prospectus or to conform such statements to actual results or revised expectations, except as required by law.

Investing in our Common Stock involves a high degree of risk. You should consider carefully the risks and uncertainties described below, together with all of the other information in this prospectus, including the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our financial statements and related notes, before making a decision to invest in our Common Stock. Our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could also be harmed by risks and uncertainties that are not presently known to us or that we currently believe are not material. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, platform, reputation, brand, results of operations, financial condition and prospects could be materially and adversely affected. In such event, the market price of our Common Stock could decline, and you could lose all or part of your investment.

Our limited operating history may make it difficult for you to evaluate the success of our business to date and to assess our future viability.

We are a clinical stage biopharmaceutical company with a limited operating history. We were incorporated in Delaware in July 2020 and commenced operations in May 2021. Our operations to date have been limited to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, identifying, investigating, licensing and evaluating potential product candidates, and establishing arrangements with third parties for the manufacture of initial quantities of our lead product candidate and component materials. Our lead product candidate is in early clinical development, and our second drug candidate is in preclinical development. We have not yet demonstrated our ability to successfully initiate, conduct or complete any clinical trials, obtain marketing approvals, manufacture a commercial-scale product or arrange for a third party to do so on our behalf, or conduct sales, marketing and distribution activities necessary for successful product commercialization. Consequently, any predictions about our future success or viability may not be as accurate.

We will need to transition at some point from a company with a research and development focus to a company capable of supporting commercial activities related to the full product life cycle. We may not be successful in such a transition.

We have incurred losses since inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur losses for the foreseeable future. We may never achieve or maintain profitability.

Investment in biopharmaceutical product development is a highly speculative undertaking and entails substantial upfront capital expenditures and significant risk that our current or potential future product candidates will fail to demonstrate adequate efficacy or an acceptable safety profile, gain regulatory approval and become commercially viable. We are still in the early stages of development of our product candidates and initiated our first clinical trial in December 2021. We have no products approved for commercial sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales to date. We continue to incur significant research and development and other expenses related to our ongoing operations. In addition, as a business with a limited operating history, we may encounter unforeseen expenses, difficulties, complications, delays and other known and unknown factors, such as the COVID-19 pandemic.

We have incurred losses in each period since we commenced operations. Since inception through the end of June 30, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $19.4 million. Those losses mainly include the following: (1), $6.3 million in research and development expenses excluding licensing agreements, (2) in connection with the exclusive licensing agreement related to our lead product candidate, NXP800, we paid an upfront payment of $3.5 million, and (3) in connection with the exclusive licensing agreement related to NXP900, we also paid an upfront payment of $3.5 million. We expect to continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future, and we expect these losses to increase substantially if and as we continue our research and development efforts and submit IND applications for our lead product candidate; conduct preclinical studies and clinical trials for our current and future product candidates; seek marketing approvals for any current or future product candidate that successfully completes clinical trials; experience any delays or encounter any issues with any of the above; establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure and scale-up manufacturing capabilities to commercialize any current or future product candidates for which we may obtain regulatory approval; obtain, expand, maintain, enforce and protect our intellectual property portfolio; hire additional clinical, regulatory and scientific personnel; and operate as a public company.

Our lead product candidate, NXP800, is in clinical development and our second product candidate, NXP900, is in the preclinical stage of development. Both product candidates will require additional preclinical studies, clinical development, regulatory review and approval, substantial investment, access to sufficient clinical and commercial manufacturing capacity and significant marketing efforts before we can generate any revenue from product sales. The Phase 1 study for NXP800 started in December 2021 and NXP900 has yet to enter clinical trials. To date, we have not generated any revenue from our product candidates. Our ability to generate revenue will depend on a number of factors, including, but not limited to:

Many of the factors listed above are beyond our control and could cause us to experience significant delays or prevent us from obtaining regulatory approvals or commercializing our current and future product candidates. Even if we can commercialize any current or future product candidates, we may not achieve profitability soon after generating product sales, if ever.

We will require substantial additional funding. Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, or require us to relinquish proprietary rights. If we are unable to raise capital as needed, we may be compelled to delay, reduce or eliminate our product development programs or commercialization efforts.

We expect our expenses to increase in parallel with our ongoing activities, particularly as we continue our discovery and preclinical development activities to identify new product candidates and initiate clinical trials of, and seek marketing approval for, any of our current or future product candidates. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our current or future product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product sales, marketing, manufacturing, and distribution. Furthermore, we expect to incur significant additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. We cannot be certain that additional funding will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, governmental funding, collaborations, strategic partnerships and alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a stockholder. Debt financing and preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends.

If we raise additional funds through collaborations, strategic alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us.

If we are unable to raise capital when needed or on attractive terms, we could be forced to delay, reduce or eliminate our discovery and preclinical development programs or any future commercialization efforts.

Major public health issues, and specifically the pandemic caused by the coronavirus COVID-19 outbreak, could have an adverse effect on our clinical trials, financial condition, results of operations, and other aspects of our business.

In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the outbreak of COVID-19 to be a pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic is having widespread, rapidly evolving, and unpredictable impacts on global society, economies, financial markets, and business practices. During 2021, there was a wide distribution of several vaccinations and medicines to overcome the pandemic. We have shifted our operations to co-exist along with the pandemic, including encouragement of vaccinations to all of our employees worldwide.

The uncertainty to which the COVID-19 pandemic impacts the Company’s business, affects management’s judgment and assumptions relating to accounting estimates in a variety of areas that depend on these estimates and assumptions. COVID-19 did not have a material influence on these estimates and judgements since the Company began operations in 2021.

The Company continues to face relative uncertainty as to the remaining intensity and duration of and the nature and timeline for recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic going forward and how all of that impacts the Company, including the extent to which potentially permanent changes clinical trial operations have been caused by the pandemic. The Company has taken the approach of managing the pandemic (to the extent that it continues to remain a significant factor) via strengthening its balance sheet and cash assets and avoiding debt while focusing on cost controls. Some factors from the COVID-19 outbreak or any outbreak caused by any variant of COVID-19 that may delay or otherwise adversely affect our clinical trial programs, as well as adversely impact our business generally, include:

We currently rely on third parties for certain functions or services in support of our clinical trials and key areas of our operations. If these third parties themselves are adversely impacted by restrictions resulting from the COVID-19 outbreak, we will likely experience delays and/or realize additional costs. As a result, our ability to commence and complete clinical trials in timely fashion, obtain regulatory approvals for, and to commercialize, our current and future product candidates may be delayed or disrupted.

Our discovery and preclinical development approach focuses on the development of precision medicines for patients with genetically defined cancers and may never lead to marketable products.

The patient populations for our product candidates and potential future product candidates are limited to those with specific target mutations and may not be completely defined but are substantially smaller than the general treated cancer population and we will need to screen and identify these patients with the targeted mutations. Successful identification of patients is dependent on several factors, including achieving certainty as to how specific genetic alterations respond to our current product candidates or any future product candidate and, if necessary, developing companion diagnostics to identify such genetic alterations. Furthermore, even if we are successful in identifying patients, we cannot be certain that the resulting patient populations for each mutation will be large enough to allow us to successfully obtain approval for each mutation type and commercialize our products and achieve profitability. In addition, even if our approach is successful in showing clinical benefit by downregulating the HSF1 pathway in tumors harboring an ARID1a mutation or alteration, we may never successfully identify additional oncogenic mutations for other genes. We do not know if our approach of treating patients with genetically defined cancers will be successful; and if our approach is unsuccessful, our business will suffer.

We are very early in our development efforts and are substantially dependent on our lead product candidate, NXP800. If we are unable to advance NXP800, NXP900 or any of our other future product candidates through preclinical and clinical development, obtain regulatory approval and ultimately commercialize NXP800, NXP900 or any of our other future product candidates, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.

NXP800, our lead product candidate, only recently started to be tested in human subjects. Our ability to generate product revenues will depend heavily on the successful clinical development and eventual commercialization of NXP800 or future product candidates. Our second drug candidate, NXP900, has begun IND-enabling studies or similar studies required by a foreign regulatory agency. Depending on the results of these IND-enabling studies, we may not be able to submit an IND application with the FDA or a similar submission with a foreign regulatory agency and, therefore, may not be able to conduct clinical trials for NXP900. In addition, our drug development programs may contemplate the development of companion diagnostics, which are assays or tests to identify an appropriate patient population. Companion diagnostics are subject to regulation as medical devices and must themselves receive marketing authorization from the FDA or certain other foreign regulatory agencies before they may be marketed. If a companion diagnostic is essential to the safe and effective use of any of our current and future product candidates, the FDA must conclude that the companion diagnostic meets the applicable standard for safety and effectiveness or for substantial equivalence for use with our product candidates before either the product candidates or companion diagnostic may be marketed in the United States.

Negative results in the development of our lead product candidate may also prevent or delay our ability to continue or conduct clinical programs or receive regulatory approvals for our other future product candidates. For example, although we believe, based on preclinical studies of OCCC models that demonstrated tumor growth inhibition, that this cancer type might be particularly sensitive to NXP800, this may not prove true in clinical testing for any or all of the target indications. Moreover, anti-tumor activity may be different in each tumor type that we plan to evaluate in clinical trials. Therefore, even though we plan to potentially pursue tumor-agnostic clinical development of NXP800, the tumor response may be low in patients with some cancers compared to others. As a result, we may be required to discontinue development of NXP800 for patients with those tumor types and/or mutations due to insufficient clinical benefit, while continuing development in a more limited population of patients. Consequently, in order to obtain regulatory approval, we may have to reach agreement with the FDA on defining the optimal patient population, study design and size, any of which may require significant additional resources and delay our clinical trials and ultimately the approval, if any, of any of our other future product candidates.

We may experience setbacks that could delay or prevent regulatory approval of, or our ability to commercialize, our current or future product candidates, including:

In addition, because we have limited financial and personnel resources and are focusing primarily on developing our lead product candidate, we may forgo or delay pursuit of other future product candidates that may prove to have greater commercial potential and may fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. If we do not accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a future product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to those future product candidates through collaboration, licensing, or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it would have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such future product candidates.

Clinical drug development involves a lengthy and expensive process with uncertain outcomes, clinical trials are difficult to design and implement, and any of our clinical trials could produce unsuccessful results or fail at any stage in the process.

Clinical trials conducted on humans are expensive and can take many years to complete, and outcomes are inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the process. Additionally, any positive results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials of a drug candidate may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials, such that drug candidates may reach later stages of clinical trials and fail to show the desired safety and efficacy traits despite having shown indications of those traits in preclinical studies and early-stage clinical trials. A number of companies in the pharmaceutical industry have suffered significant setbacks in advanced clinical trials due to lack of efficacy or adverse safety profiles, notwithstanding promising results in preclinical studies or earlier phases of clinical trials. Therefore, the results of any future clinical trials we conduct may not be successful.

Clinical trials may be delayed, suspended or prematurely terminated because costs are greater than we anticipate or for a variety of reasons, such as:

We rely and plan to continue to rely on CROs, contract manufacturing organizations (“CMOs”) and clinical trial sites to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our clinical trials. Although we have and expect that we will have agreements in place with CROs and CMOs governing their contracted activities and conduct, we will have limited influence over their actual performance. As a result, we ultimately do not and will not have control over a CRO’s or CMO’s compliance with the terms of any agreement it may have with us, its compliance with applicable regulatory requirements, or its adherence to agreed-upon time schedules and deadlines, and a future CRO or CMO’s failure to perform those obligations could subject any of our clinical trials to delays or failure.

Further, we may also encounter delays if a clinical trial is suspended or terminated by us, by any IRB or ethics committee, by a Data Safety Monitoring Board, or by the FDA or European Medicines Agency (“EMA”), or other regulatory authority. A suspension or termination may be due to a number of factors, including failure to conduct the clinical trial in accordance with regulatory requirements, inspection of the clinical trial operations or trial site by the FDA, EMA or other regulatory authorities, exposing participants to health risks caused by unforeseen safety issues or adverse side effects, development of previously unseen safety issues, failure to demonstrate a benefit from using a drug candidate, or changes in governmental regulations or administrative actions. Therefore, we cannot predict with any certainty the schedule for commencement or completion of any currently ongoing, planned or future clinical trials.

Many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of clinical trials may also ultimately lead to the denial of marketing approval for our current or future product candidates.

If we experience delays in the commencement or completion of, or suspension or termination of, any clinical trial for our drug candidates, the commercial prospects of the drug candidate could be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues from the drug candidate may be delayed or eliminated. In addition, any delays in completing our clinical trials will increase our costs, slow down our drug candidate development and approval process and jeopardize regulatory approval of our drug candidates and our ability to commence sales and generate revenues.

The occurrence of any of these events could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects significantly.

Difficulty in enrolling patients could delay or prevent clinical trials of our current or future product candidates.

Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in clinical studies of our current or future product candidates is critical to our success. The timing of completion of our clinical studies depends in part on the speed at which we can recruit patients to participate in testing our current or future product candidates and we may experience delays in our clinical trials if we encounter difficulties in enrollment. Further, because we are focused on patients with specific indications and genetic mutations, our ability to enroll eligible patients may be limited and may result in slower enrollment than we anticipate. Our clinical trials will compete with other clinical trials for current or future product candidates that are in the same therapeutic areas as our current or future product candidates, which may reduce the number and types of patients available to us.

Clinical trials may be subject to delays as a result of patient enrollment taking longer than anticipated or greater than anticipated subject withdrawal. We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials for our current or future product candidates if we are unable to locate and enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in these trials as required by the FDA or foreign regulatory authorities. We cannot predict how successful we will be at enrolling subjects in future clinical trials. The enrollment of patients depends on many factors, including:

If we are unable to locate and enroll sufficient eligible patients to participate, as required by the FDA or similar regulatory authorities, we may be unable to initiate or continue clinical trials for our current or future product candidates. If necessary, we intend to engage third parties to develop companion diagnostics for use in our clinical trials. If such third parties are unsuccessful, our difficulty in identifying patients with the targeted genetic mutations for our clinical trials would be increased. If we are unable to include patients with the targeted genetic mutations or patients with well-defined serious unmet medical needs, we may be unable to participate in the FDA’s expedited review and development programs, including breakthrough therapy designation and fast track designation, or otherwise seek to accelerate clinical development and regulatory timelines.

Our preclinical studies and clinical trials may fail to demonstrate adequately the safety, potency, purity, efficacy or any other necessary pharmacological properties of any of our current or future product candidates, which would prevent or delay development, regulatory approval and commercialization.

Before obtaining regulatory approvals for the commercial sale of our current or future product candidates, including NXP800 and NXP900, we must demonstrate through lengthy, complex and expensive preclinical studies and clinical trials that our current or future product candidates are both safe and effective for use in each target indication. Preclinical and clinical testing is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. Failure can occur at any time during the preclinical study and clinical trial processes, and, because our current product candidates are in an early stage of development, there is a high risk of failure.

The results of preclinical studies and early clinical trials of our current or future product candidates may not be predictive of the results of later-stage clinical trials. Although product candidates may demonstrate promising results in preclinical studies and early clinical trials, they may not prove to be effective in subsequent clinical trials. Additionally, while we initiated the first clinical trial for NXP800 in December 2021, clinical trials for any of our current or future product candidates, as is the case with all oncology drugs, it is likely that there may be side effects associated with their use. Results of our trials could reveal a high and unacceptable severity and prevalence of these or other side effects. In such an event, our trials could be suspended or terminated, and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities could order us to halt or cease further development of or deny approval of our current or future product candidates for any or all targeted indications. Drug-related side effects could also affect patient recruitment into the study or patient willingness to remain in the study and therefore affect our ability to complete clinical trials. Drug-related side effects could also result in potential product liability claims. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly.

The FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities may not accept data from any preclinical or clinical trials we may conduct in foreign countries.

The FDA’s acceptance of data generated for patients recruited outside the United States from clinical trials conducted in whole or in part outside the United States may be subject to certain conditions, if accepted at all.

Although the FDA has the authority to accept foreign data as part or even the sole basis for marketing approval, the FDA generally does not approve an application on the basis of foreign data alone unless (i) the data is applicable to the U.S. population and U.S. medical practice, (ii) the trials were performed by clinical investigators of recognized competence and pursuant to GCP regulations, and (iii) the FDA’s clinical trial requirements were met. Many foreign regulatory authorities have similar approval requirements. In addition, any clinical study conducted in whole or in part outside of the United States would be subject to the applicable local laws of the jurisdiction where the trial was conducted. We cannot guarantee that the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authority will accept data from trials conducted in whole or in part outside of the United States, which may result in the need for additional trials.

We may not be able to submit IND applications to commence additional clinical trials on the timelines we expect, and even if we are able to, the FDA may not permit us to proceed.

Our CTA and IND for NXP800 with the MHRA and the FDA, respectively have been approved. However, if we experience manufacturing delays or any other delays, we may be unable to file additional CTAs, IND applications or other clinical research authorizations for other product candidates on our expected timelines. Moreover, while we have obtained CTA and IND approvals, we cannot be sure that issues will not arise that suspend or terminate such clinical trials. Any failure to file CTAs, IND applications or other clinical research authorizations will adversely impact our expected timelines to obtain regulatory acceptance for the commencement of our trials and may prevent us from completing our clinical trials or commercializing our products on a timely basis, if at all.

We currently have no marketing and sales organization and have limited experience in marketing products. If we are unable to establish marketing and sales capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell any approved product candidates, we may not be able to generate product revenue.

We will have to compete with other pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies to recruit, hire, train and retain marketing and sales personnel. If we are unable or decide not to establish internal sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities, we may pursue arrangements with third-party sales, marketing, and distribution collaborators regarding the sales and marketing of our products, if approved.

There can be no assurance that we will be able to develop in-house sales and distribution capabilities or establish or maintain relationships with third-party collaborators to commercialize any product in the United States or overseas.

We face substantial competition, which may result in others discovering, developing or commercializing products before or more successfully than we do.

While we believe that our scientific knowledge, technology, and development expertise provide us with competitive advantages, we face potential competition from many different sources, including major pharmaceuticals, specialty pharmaceuticals and biotechnology companies, academic institutions and government agencies, and public and private research institutes that conduct research, development, manufacturing, and commercialization. Many of our competitors have significantly greater financial resources and expertise in research and development, manufacturing, preclinical testing, regulatory approvals, and product marketing than we do. Our competitors may compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific and management personnel and establishing clinical trial sites and patient recruitment for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs. As a result, our competitors may discover, develop, license, or commercialize products earlier or more successfully than we do.

If our product candidates, NXP800 and NXP900, are approved for the indications for which we are currently conducting or planning preclinical and clinical trials, they will likely compete with competitor drugs and other drugs that are currently in development. The availability of reimbursement from government and other third-party payors will also significantly affect the pricing and competitiveness of our products. Our competitors may also obtain FDA or other regulatory approval for their products more rapidly than we do, which could result in our competitors establishing a strong market position before we are able to enter the market.

Denial of or delay in our receipt of required regulatory approvals may prevent or delay commercialization of our current or future product candidates and our ability to generate revenue may be materially impaired.

The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, approval, sale, marketing and distribution of drug products are, and will remain, subject to extensive regulation by the FDA in the United States and by the respective regulatory authorities in other countries where regulations differ. We will not be permitted to market our current or future product candidates in the United States until we receive the respective approval of an NDA from the FDA, or in any foreign countries until we receive the requisite approval from the respective regulatory authorities in such countries. The time required to obtain regulatory approval, if any, by the FDA, EMA and comparable foreign authorities is unpredictable, but typically takes many years following the commencement of clinical trials and depends upon numerous factors, including the substantial discretion of the regulatory authorities and the type, complexity and novelty of the product candidates involved. Regulatory authorities have substantial discretion in the approval process and may refuse to accept any application or may decide that our data are insufficient for approval and require additional nonclinical studies or clinical trials.

Obtaining regulatory approval requires the submission of extensive nonclinical and clinical data and supporting information to regulatory authorities for each therapeutic indication to establish the product candidate’s safety and efficacy. Securing regulatory approval also requires the submission of information about the product manufacturing process, and in many cases the inspection of manufacturing, processing, and packaging facilities by the regulatory authorities. Our current or future product candidates may not be effective, may be only moderately effective or may prove to have undesirable or unintended side effects, toxicities or other characteristics that may preclude our obtaining marketing approval or prevent or limit commercial use, or there may be deficiencies in cGMP compliance by us or by our CMOs that could result in the candidate not being approved. Moreover, we have not obtained regulatory approval for any drug candidate in any jurisdiction and it is possible that none of our existing drug candidates or any drug candidates we may seek to develop in the future will ever obtain regulatory approval.

Our drug candidates could fail to receive, or could be delayed in receiving, regulatory approval for many reasons, including any one or more of the following:

The time and expense of the approval process, as well as the unpredictability of future clinical trial results and other contributing factors, may result in our failure to obtain regulatory approval to market NXP800, NXP900 or any other drug candidates we may seek to develop in the future, which would significantly harm our business, results of operations and prospects. In such case, we may also not have the resources to conduct new clinical trials and/or we may determine that further clinical development of any such drug candidate is not justified and may discontinue any such programs.

In addition, even if we were to obtain regulatory approval in one or more jurisdictions, regulatory authorities may approve any of our drug candidates for fewer or more limited indications than we request, may not approve prices we may propose to charge for our products, may grant approval contingent on the performance of costly post-marketing clinical trials (referred to as “conditional” or “accelerated” approval depending on the jurisdiction), or may approve a drug candidate with a label that does not include the labeling claims necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of that drug candidate. Any of the foregoing circumstances could materially harm the commercial prospects for our drug candidates.

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of our current or future product candidates in one jurisdiction does not mean that we will be successful in obtaining regulatory approval of our current or future product candidates in other jurisdictions.

Obtaining and maintaining regulatory approval of any of our current or future product candidates in one jurisdiction does not guarantee that we will be able to obtain or maintain regulatory approval in any other jurisdiction, while a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one jurisdiction may have a negative effect on the regulatory approval process in other jurisdictions. For example, even if the FDA grants regulatory approval of a product candidate, similar foreign regulatory authorities must also approve the manufacturing, marketing and promotion of the product candidate in those countries. Drug product approval procedures vary among jurisdictions and can involve requirements and administrative review periods different from, and greater than, those in the United States, including additional preclinical studies or clinical trials as clinical trials conducted in one jurisdiction may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions. In many jurisdictions outside the United States, a product candidate must be approved for reimbursement before it can be approved for sale in that jurisdiction. In some cases, the price that we intend to charge for our products is also subject to approval.

We may also submit marketing applications in other countries. Regulatory authorities in jurisdictions outside of the United States have requirements for approval of product candidates with which we must comply prior to marketing in those jurisdictions. Obtaining similar foreign regulatory approvals and compliance with similar foreign regulatory requirements could result in significant delays, difficulties and costs for us and could delay or prevent the introduction of our products in certain countries. We do not have any product candidates approved for sale in any jurisdiction, including international markets, and we do not have experience in obtaining regulatory approval in international markets. If we fail to comply with the regulatory requirements in international markets and/or receive applicable marketing approvals, our target market will be reduced and our ability to realize the full market potential of our current or future product candidates will be harmed.

Even if we receive regulatory approval of our current or future product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing regulatory obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense and we may be subject to penalties if we fail to comply with regulatory requirements or experience unanticipated problems with our current or future product candidates.

If any of our current or future product candidates are approved, activities such as the manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling, and record keeping for the products will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as ongoing compliance with cGMP regulations. Drug manufacturers and any CMOs responsible for any product manufacturing processes are required to comply with extensive FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authority requirements, including ensuring that quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP regulations and any applicable foreign equivalents. As such, we and our CMOs will be subject to continual review and inspections to assess compliance with cGMP and adherence to commitments made in any NDA, other marketing application, and previous responses to inspection observations. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work must continue to expend time, money, and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production and quality control.

The FDA or a comparable foreign regulatory authority may also impose requirements for costly post-marketing nonclinical studies or clinical trials (often called “Phase 4 trials”) and post-marketing surveillance to monitor the safety or efficacy of the product. If we or a regulatory authority discover previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, production problems or issues with the facility where the product is manufactured or processed, such as product contamination or significant not-compliance with applicable cGMP regulations, a regulator may impose restrictions on that product, the manufacturing facility or us. If we or our third-party providers, including our CMOs, fail to comply fully with applicable regulations, then we may be required to initiate a recall or withdrawal of our products.

Later discovery of previously unknown problems with our current or future product candidates, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in the following, among other things:

In addition, regulatory authorities’ policies (such as those of the FDA or EMA) may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our current or future product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are otherwise not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.

Non-compliance with European Union requirements regarding safety monitoring or pharmacovigilance can also result in significant financial penalties. Similarly, failure to comply with the European Union’s requirements regarding the protection of personal information can also lead to significant penalties and sanctions.

The FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay marketing approval of our current or future product candidates. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, this may adversely affect, or even lead to the rescission of, the marketing approval that we may have obtained, which would adversely affect our business, prospects and ability to achieve or sustain profitability.

A variety of risks associated with marketing our current or future product candidates internationally could materially adversely affect our business.

We plan to seek regulatory approval of our current or future product candidates outside of the United States and expect that we will be subject to additional risks related to operating in foreign countries including: differing regulatory requirements; unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers, price and exchange controls; economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets; compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad; foreign currency fluctuations that result in increased operating expenses, reduced revenue, and other obligations incident to doing business in another country; potential liability under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 or comparable foreign regulations; and challenges enforcing our contractual and intellectual property rights, especially in countries that do not recognize intellectual property rights to the same extent as the United States.

The insurance coverage and reimbursement status of newly approved products is uncertain. Our current or future product candidates may become subject to unfavorable pricing regulations, third-party coverage and reimbursement practices, or healthcare reform initiatives, which would harm our business. Failure to obtain or maintain adequate coverage and reimbursement for new or current products could limit our ability to market those products and decrease our ability to generate revenue.

Adverse pricing limitations may hinder our ability to recoup our investment in one or more of our current or future product candidates, even if any such current or future product candidate we may develop obtains marketing approval.

Our ability to successfully commercialize any current or future product candidates will depend in part on the coverage and reimbursement for the products and related treatments from government health administration authorities and third-party payors, such as private health insurers and health maintenance organizations. These organizations decide which medications they will pay for and establish reimbursement levels. If coverage and adequate reimbursement is not available, or the approved reimbursement amount is not high enough, we may be unable to establish or maintain pricing sufficient to generate a return on our investment and may be unable to successfully commercialize our current or future product candidates. Reimbursement by a third-party payor may depend upon a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the third-party payor’s determination that use of a product is a covered benefit under its health plan, safe, effective and medically necessary, appropriate for the specific patient, cost-effective, and neither experimental nor investigational. If coverage and adequate reimbursement is not available, or the approved reimbursement amount is not high enough, we may be unable to establish or maintain pricing sufficient to generate a return on our investment and may be unable to successfully commercialize our current or future product candidates.

A primary trend in the U.S. healthcare industry and elsewhere is cost containment. Government authorities and third-party payors have attempted to control costs by limiting coverage and the amount of reimbursement for particular medications. In general, the prices of medicines under such systems are substantially lower than in the United States.

There is also significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products, and coverage may be more limited than the purposes for which the medicine is approved by the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities. In the United States, the principal decisions about reimbursement for new medicines are typically made by CMS. As a result, the coverage determination process is often a time consuming and costly process that may require us to provide scientific and clinical support for the use of our products to each payor separately, with no assurance that coverage and adequate reimbursement will be applied consistently or obtained in the first instance. It is difficult to predict what CMS will decide with respect to reimbursement for fundamentally novel products such as ours. Reimbursement agencies in Europe may be more conservative than CMS. Our inability to promptly obtain coverage and profitable payment rates from both government-funded and private payors for any approved products we may develop could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, our ability to raise capital needed to commercialize our current or future product candidates, and our overall financial condition.

Healthcare legislative measures and changes in policies, funding, staffing and leadership at the FDA and other agencies could hinder or prevent the commercial success of our products.

In the United States, there have been a number of legislative and regulatory changes to the healthcare system that could affect our future results of operations and the future results of operations of our potential customers.

In recent years, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which biopharmaceutical manufacturers set prices for their marketed products, which has resulted in several recent government inquiries as well as federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, increase drug price transparency, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, reduce the cost of drugs under Medicare, and reform government reimbursement for drug products. Congress and the executive branch have each indicated that they will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs, making this area subject to ongoing uncertainty. At the state level in the United States, legislatures have also increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control drug product pricing.

While we cannot predict what impact these laws or policies will have in general or specifically on any product we may commercialize in the future, such efforts by the government and payors may result in downward pressure on reimbursement, which could negatively affect market acceptance of new products. Any rebates, discounts, taxes costs or regulatory or systematic changes on healthcare may have a significant effect on our profitability in the future.

Given recent federal and state government initiatives directed at lowering the total cost of healthcare, the executive branch, Congress and state legislatures will likely continue to focus on healthcare reform and the reform of the Medicare and Medicaid programs. While we cannot predict the full outcome of any such government action or legislation, it may harm our ability to market our products and generate revenues.

Furthermore, regulatory authorities’ assessment of the data and results required to demonstrate safety and effectiveness can change over time and can be affected by many factors, such as the emergence of new information, including on other products, changing policies and agency funding, staffing and leadership. We cannot be sure whether future changes to the regulatory environment will be favorable or unfavorable to our business prospects.

Our future relationships with customers and third-party payors in the United States and elsewhere may be subject to applicable anti-kickback, fraud and abuse, false claims, transparency, health information privacy and security and other healthcare laws and regulations, which could expose us to criminal sanctions, civil penalties, contractual damages, reputational harm, administrative burdens, diminished profits and future earnings.

Healthcare providers, physicians and third-party payors in the U.S. and elsewhere will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any current or future product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. Our future arrangements with third-party payors and customers may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations, including, without limitation, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute and the federal False Claims Act, which may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we sell, market and distribute any current or future product candidates for which we obtain marketing approval. In addition, we may be subject to transparency laws and patient privacy regulation by the federal and state governments and by governments in foreign jurisdictions in which we conduct our business. The applicable federal, state and foreign healthcare laws and regulations that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not necessarily limited to:

In November 2020, HHS finalized significant changes to the regulations implementing the Anti-Kickback Statute, as well as the Physician Self-Referral Law and the civil monetary penalty rules regarding beneficiary inducements, with the goal of offering the healthcare industry more flexibility and reducing the regulatory burden associated with those fraud and abuse laws, particularly with respect to value-based arrangements among industry participants.

Efforts to ensure that our business arrangements with third parties will comply with applicable healthcare laws and regulations may involve substantial costs. It is possible that governmental authorities will conclude that our business practices may not comply with current or future statutes, regulations or case law involving applicable fraud and abuse or other healthcare laws and regulations. If our operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws or any other governmental regulations that may apply to us, we may be subject to significant civil, criminal and administrative penalties, including, without limitation, damages, fines, imprisonment, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and the curtailment or restructuring of our operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our businesses. If any of the physicians or other healthcare providers or entities with whom we expect to do business, including our collaborators, is found not to be in compliance with applicable laws, it may be subject to criminal, civil or administrative sanctions, including exclusions from participation in government healthcare programs, which could also materially affect our businesses.

If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.

We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Our operations may involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological and radioactive materials. Our operations also may produce hazardous waste products. We currently contract with third parties for the conduct of our manufacturing efforts and preclinical studies and clinical trials and such third parties are responsible for disposal of these materials and wastes. However, we cannot eliminate our risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from our use of hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.

Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. We do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us in connection with our storage or disposal of biological, hazardous or radioactive materials.

We currently hold a license to certain intellectual property rights relating to our lead product candidate, NXP800 and to NXP900, as well as intellectual property rights relating to other compounds that modulate HSF1 and the SRC and YES1 kinases. If we are unable to maintain patent and other intellectual property protection for NXP800 and NXP900, and to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protections for our other current or future product candidates and technology, or if the scope of intellectual property protection obtained or maintained is not sufficiently broad, our competitors could develop and commercialize products and technology similar or identical to ours, and our ability to commercialize NXP800, NXP900 or any other current or future product candidates or technology may be adversely affected.

Our success depends in large part on our ability to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection in the United States and other countries with respect to our current or future product candidates, including NXP800 and NXP900, their respective components, formulations, combination therapies, methods used to manufacture them and methods of treatment and development that are important to our business, as well as successfully defending these patents against third-party challenges. If we do not adequately protect our intellectual property rights, or if the intellectual property rights we are able to obtain are insufficiently broad and exclusive, competitors may be able to erode or negate any competitive advantage we may have, which could harm our business and ability to achieve profitability.

We intend to rely upon a combination of patents, patent applications, confidentiality agreements, trade secret protection and license agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our current or future product candidates and technologies. Any disclosure to or misappropriation by third parties of our confidential proprietary information could enable competitors to quickly duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market. We, or any current or future partners, collaborators, or licensees, may fail to identify patentable aspects of inventions made in the course of development and commercialization activities before it is too late to obtain patent protection on them. We may be also unable to exclusively license relevant technology and associated intellectual property developed by others. Therefore, we may miss potential opportunities to establish our patent position.

If we are unable to secure additional patent protection or maintain existing or future patent protection with respect to NXP800, NXP900, or any other proprietary products and technology we develop, our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects would be materially harmed.

We currently hold a license to certain intellectual property rights relating to NXP800, including its composition of matter and to other compounds that modulate HSF1. In addition, we hold a license to certain intellectual property relating to NXP900, including its composition of matter and to other compounds that inhibit the SRC and YES1 kinases.

We have licensed one patent family covering the composition of matter for NXP800, including two issued U.S. patents covering the composition of matter for NXP800, as well as methods for using and making NXP800. Additionally, patents have been issued in major markets, including the U.S., the European Union, and Japan. The statutory expiration for the issued U.S. patents in this family is October 2034, without considering any patent extensions that may or may not be possible.

We have licensed a patent family directed to additional compounds that modulate HSF1. A patent from this family has been granted in the U.S., and has a statutory expiration of April 2036, without considering any patent extensions that may or may not be possible.

We have also licensed a patent family directed to deuterated compounds that modulate HSF1. Any U.S. patent that grants from this family would have a statutory expiration of October 2037, without considering any patent extensions or patent disclaimers that may or may not be possible.

We have licensed one patent family covering the composition of matter for NXP900, which has been granted in the U.S., EU, Japan, China and is pending in the United Kingdom and Canada. The statutory expiration for patents in this patent family is April 2036, without considering any possible patent term extension.

If the scope of our patent protection, whether now or in the future, with respect to NXP800, NXP900 or our future product candidates and technology is not sufficiently broad, we will be unable to prevent others from using our technology or from developing or commercializing technology and products similar or identical to ours or other competing products and technologies. Any failure to obtain or maintain patent protection, through our own patents or through in-licensing, with respect to NXP800, NXP900 and our future product candidates would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.

Even if they are unchallenged, our patent applications, if issued, and any patents we may own or in-license now or in the future, may not provide us with any meaningful protection or prevent competitors from designing around our patent claims to circumvent any patents we may own or in-license in the future by developing similar or alternative technologies or therapeutics in a non-infringing manner. If the patent protection provided by our patent applications or any patents we may pursue with respect to our current or future product candidates is not sufficiently broad to impede competition, our ability to successfully commercialize our current or future product candidates could be negatively affected, which would harm our business.

Additionally, we cannot be certain that the claims in our patent applications covering composition of matter (or other related aspects) of our current or future product candidates or technology will be considered patentable by the USPTO, or by patent offices in foreign countries, or that the claims in any issued patents we may own or in-license in the future will be considered patentable by courts in the United States or foreign countries.

The issuance of a patent does not foreclose challenges to its inventorship, scope, validity or enforceability. Therefore, our owned and in-licensed patents may be challenged in the courts or patent offices in the United States and elsewhere. Such challenges may result in loss of exclusivity or freedom to operate or in patent claims being narrowed, invalidated, or held unenforceable, in whole or in part. Successful patent challenges could limit our ability to stop others from using or commercializing similar or identical technology and products, or limit the duration of the patent protection of our technology and products. Given the amount of time required for the development, testing and regulatory review of new product candidates, patents protecting such product candidates might expire before or shortly after such product candidates are commercialized. As a result, our owned and in-licensed patents may not provide us with sufficient rights to exclude others from commercializing products similar or identical to ours.

Moreover, we may be subject to a third-party pre-issuance submission of prior art to the USPTO, or become involved in opposition, derivation, reexamination, inter parties review, post-grant review or interference proceedings challenging our patent rights or the patent rights of others. An adverse determination in any such submission, Patent Trial and Appeal Board trial, proceeding or litigation could reduce the scope of, render unenforceable, or invalidate, our patent rights, allow third parties to commercialize our technology or products and compete directly with us, without payment to us, or result in our inability to manufacture or commercialize products without infringing third party patent rights. In addition, if the breadth or strength of protection provided by our patents and patent applications is threatened, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to license, develop or commercialize current or future product candidates.

If we fail to comply with our obligations in our current license agreements, or in any future agreements under which we may license intellectual property rights from third parties or otherwise experience disruptions to our business relationships with our current or future licensors, we could lose license rights that are important to our business.

We are currently party to a license which grants us certain intellectual property rights relating to our lead product candidate, NXP800, as well as other compounds that modulate HSF1, and to a license which grants us certain intellectual property rights relating to our second drug candidate, NXP900, as well as other compounds that inhibit the SRC and YES1 kinases. These agreements impose numerous obligations on us to maintain our licensing rights, including development, diligence, payment, commercialization, funding, milestone, royalty, sublicensing, insurance, patent prosecution, enforcement and other obligations. In spite of our efforts, our licensor might conclude that we have materially breached our license agreement and might therefore terminate the license agreement, thereby removing or limiting our ability to develop and commercialize NXP800 or NXP900 (and other compounds covered by the licenses).

Additionally, in the future, we may be party to other license or collaboration agreements with third parties to advance our research or allow commercialization of current or future product candidates. Such future agreements may impose numerous obligations, such as development, diligence, payment, commercialization, funding, milestone, royalty, sublicensing, insurance, patent prosecution, enforcement and other obligations on us and may require us to meet development timelines, or to exercise commercially reasonable efforts to develop and commercialize licensed products, in order to maintain the licenses. In spite of our efforts, our future licensors might conclude that we have materially breached our future license agreements and might terminate the license agreements, thereby removing or limiting our ability to develop and commercialize products and technologies covered by these license agreements.

Any termination of these current or future licenses, or failure of the underlying patents to provide the intended exclusivity, could result in the loss of significant rights and could harm our ability to commercialize our current or future product candidates, and competitors or other third parties would have the freedom to seek regulatory approval of, and to market, products identical to ours and we may be required to cease our development and commercialization of certain of our current or future product candidates. Any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position, business, financial conditions, results of operations, and prospects.

If we are unable to protect the confidentiality of our trade secrets, our business and competitive position would be harmed.

In addition to the protection afforded by patents we may own or in-license in the future, we seek to rely on trade secret protection, confidentiality agreements, and license agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce, and any other elements of our product discovery and development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information, or technology that is not covered by patents. Although we require all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information, or technology to enter into confidentiality agreements, trade secrets can be difficult to protect and we have limited control over the protection of trade secrets used by our collaborators and suppliers.

If we are unable to prevent unauthorized material disclosure of our intellectual property to third parties, we will not be able to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market, which could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and future prospects.

Third-party claims of intellectual property infringement, misappropriation or other violations may be costly and time consuming and may prevent or delay our product discovery and development efforts.

The intellectual property landscape around precision medicine is crowded, and third parties may initiate legal proceedings alleging that we are infringing, misappropriating, or otherwise violating their intellectual property rights; the outcome of which would be uncertain and could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business. We or any of our future licensors or strategic partners may be party to, exposed to, or threatened with, future adversarial proceedings or litigation by third parties having patent or other intellectual property rights alleging that our current or future product candidates and/or proprietary technologies infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate their intellectual property rights. Thus, because of the large number of patents issued and patent applications filed in our fields, there may be a risk that third parties may allege they have patent rights encompassing our current or future product candidates, technologies or methods.

Third parties may assert that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization. In addition, because some patent applications in the United States may be maintained in secrecy until the patents are issued, patent applications in the United States and many foreign jurisdictions are typically not published until 18 months after filing, and publications in the scientific literature often lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that others have not filed patent applications covering our current or future product candidates or technology. If any such patent applications issue as patents, and if such patents have priority over our patent applications or patents we may own or in-license, we may be required to obtain rights to such patents owned by third parties which may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all, or may only be available on a non-exclusive basis.

In the event of a successful claim of infringement, misappropriation or other violation against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, obtain one or more licenses from third parties, pay royalties or redesign our infringing products, which may be impossible or require substantial time and monetary expenditure.

Changes to patent law in the United States and in foreign jurisdictions could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our products.

Our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances and weakened the rights of patent owners in certain situations. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents, once obtained. Laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to enforce patents that we might obtain in the future.

We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of any intellectual property, including any patents we may own or in-license currently or in the future.

We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an interest in any patents we may own or in-license currently or in the future, trade secrets, or other intellectual property as an inventor or co-inventor. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these and other claims challenging inventorship of any patents we may own or in-license in the future, trade secrets or other intellectual property.

We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information or alleged trade secrets of third parties or competitors or are in breach of non-competition or non-solicitation agreements with our competitors.

We may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed confidential information or trade secrets of these third parties or our employees’ former employers or our consultants’ or contractors’ current or former clients or customers. Litigation or arbitration may be necessary to defend against these claims.

If we do not obtain patent term extension and data exclusivity for any of our current or future product candidates we may develop, our business may be materially harmed.

Depending upon the timing, duration and specifics of any FDA marketing approval of any of our current or future product candidates we may develop, one or more U.S. patents we may own or in-license in the future may be eligible for limited patent term extension under the Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, or the Hatch-Waxman Amendments. If we are unable to obtain patent term extension or the term of any such extension is shorter than what we request, our competitors may obtain approval of competing products following expiration of any patents that issue from our patent applications, and our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects could be materially harmed.

If our trademarks and trade names are not adequately protected, then we may not be able to build name recognition in our marks of interest and our business may be adversely affected.

Our trademarks or trade names may be challenged, infringed, diluted, circumvented or declared generic or determined to be infringing on other marks. We intend to rely on both registration and common law protection for our trademarks. We may not be able to protect our rights to these trademarks and trade names or may be forced to stop using these names, which we need for name recognition by potential partners or customers in our markets of interest. If we are unable to obtain a registered trademark or establish name recognition based on our trademarks and trade names, we may not be able to compete effectively and our business may be adversely affected.

We plan to rely on third parties to conduct our preclinical studies and clinical trials. If these third parties do not properly and successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval of or commercialize our current or future product candidates.

We plan to utilize and depend upon independent investigators and collaborators, such as medical institutions, CROs, CMOs, and strategic partners to conduct and support our preclinical studies and clinical trials under agreements with us. We rely upon, and plan to continue to rely upon, such third-party entities to execute our clinical trials and preclinical studies and to monitor and manage data produced by and relating to those studies and trials. However, in the future we may not be able to establish arrangements with CROs when needed or on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all, which could negatively affect our development efforts with respect to our drug candidates and materially harm our business, operations and prospects. As a result of the use of third-party contractors, we will have only limited control over certain aspects of their activities. Nevertheless, we are responsible for ensuring that each of our studies, including each of our clinical trials, is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements as well as scientific standards, and our reliance on any third-party entity will not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities.

Based on our present expectations, we and our third-party contractors will be required to comply with GCP regulations for the clinical development of all of our drug candidates. If we or any of these third parties fail to comply with applicable GLP or GCP regulations, the clinical data generated in our preclinical and clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA or comparable foreign regulatory authorities may require us to perform additional clinical trials before approving our marketing applications, which we may not have sufficient cash or other resources to support and which would delay our ability to generate revenue from future sales of such drug candidate. Any agreements governing our relationships with CROs or other contractors with whom we currently engage or may engage in the future may provide those outside contractors with certain rights to terminate a clinical trial under specified circumstances. If such an outside contractor terminates its relationship with us during the performance of a clinical trial, we would be forced to seek an engagement with a substitute contractor, which we may not be able to do on a timely basis or on commercially reasonable terms, if at all, and the applicable clinical trial would experience delays or may not be completed.

Large-scale clinical trials require significant additional financial and management resources and reliance on third-party clinical investigators, CROs, and consultants, which may cause us to encounter delays that are outside of our control. We may be unable to identify and contract with sufficient investigators, CROs, or consultants on a timely basis, if at all.

If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations or meet expected deadlines, if they need to be replaced, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols, legal and regulatory requirements or for other reasons, our preclinical or clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated and we may not be able to complete development of, obtain regulatory approval for, or successfully commercialize, our current or future product candidates. In addition, we will be unable to control whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our preclinical and clinical programs. These outside contractors may not assign as great a priority to our programs or pursue them as diligently as we would if we were undertaking such programs ourselves. As a result, our operations and the commercial prospects for the effected drug candidates would be harmed, our costs could increase and our ability to generate revenues could be delayed. These contractors may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of whom may compete with us. If our contractors assist our competitors to our detriment, our competitive position would be harmed.

If our relationships with any third parties conducting our studies are terminated, we may be unable to enter into arrangements with alternative third parties on commercially reasonable terms, or at all. Switching or adding third parties to conduct our studies involves substantial cost and requires extensive management time and focus. In addition, there is a natural transition period when a new third party commences work. As a result, delays occur, which can materially impact our ability to meet our desired clinical development timelines. Although we carefully manage our relationships with third parties conducting our studies, we cannot assure you that we will not encounter similar challenges or delays in the future or that these delays or challenges will not have a material and adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on the third-party manufacturers to manufacture our current or future product candidates. Reliance on third parties increases the risk that we will not have sufficient quantities of our products or such quantities at an acceptable quality and cost, which could delay, prevent or impair our development or commercialization efforts.

We do not currently own any facility that may be used as our clinical-scale manufacturing and processing facility and must rely on outside vendors to manufacture our current or future product candidates. We rely on a single CMO for manufacturing the NXP800 drug substance and the NXP800 drug product, which are manufactured at two different sites of the same CMO. We intend to continue our relationship with this CMO for the supply of NXP800; however, there can be no assurance that we will be able to retain this relationship on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we are unable to maintain this relationship, we could experience delays in our development efforts as we locate and qualify a new CMO. For the in vitro and in vivo experiments of NXP900 conducted to date, small, lab-scale, non cGMP material has been used. While we have identified an appropriate cGMP CMO to manufacture drug substance and drug product for NXP900, there is no assurance that such CMO will be successful in manufacturing NXP900 drug substance or product. If NXP800, NXP900 or any other drug candidate we may develop or acquire in the future receives regulatory approval, we will rely on one or more CMOs to manufacture the commercial supply of such drugs.

Our anticipated reliance on a limited number of third-party manufacturers exposes us to a number of risks, including:

Each of these risks could delay or prevent the completion of our preclinical or clinical trials or the approval of any of our current or future product candidates by the FDA or another foreign regulatory authority, result in higher costs or adversely impact commercialization of our current or future product candidates.

Although our agreements with our CMOs require them to perform according to certain cGMP requirements such as those relating to quality control, quality assurance and qualified personnel, we cannot control the conduct of our CMOs to implement and maintain these standards. If any of our CMOs cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and the regulatory requirements of the FDA, EMA or other comparable foreign authorities, we could be prevented from obtaining regulatory approval for our drug candidates unless and until we engage a substitute CMO that can comply with such requirements, which we may not be able to do. Any such failure by any of our CMOs would significantly impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our drug candidates, if approved.

If our third-party manufacturers use hazardous and biological materials in a manner that causes injury or violates applicable law, we may be liable for damages.

Although we believe that our manufacturers’ procedures for using, handling, storing, and disposing of hazardous and biological materials comply with legally prescribed standards, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury. In the event of an accident, local, city, state or federal authorities may curtail the use of these materials and interrupt our business operations. Further, we could be held liable for damages or penalized with fines, and the liability could exceed our resources. We do not have any insurance for liabilities arising from medical or hazardous materials.

We are highly dependent on our key personnel and anticipate hiring new key personnel. If we are not successful in attracting and retaining highly qualified personnel, we may not be able to successfully implement our business strategy.

Our ability to compete in the highly competitive biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries depends upon our ability to attract and retain highly qualified managerial, scientific and medical personnel. We are highly dependent on our management, scientific and medical personnel, including our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, our Chief Scientific and Business Officer and our Chief Development and Operations Officer. While we expect to engage in an orderly transition process as we integrate newly appointed officers and managers, we face a variety of risks and uncertainties relating to management transition, including diversion of management attention from business concerns, failure to retain other key personnel or loss of institutional knowledge.

We will need to grow the size of our organization, and we may experience difficulties in managing this growth.

As of June 30, 2022, we had 10 full-time employees. We also contract for various services through consulting and vendor agreements. We intend to hire new employees to conduct our research and development activities in the future. Any delay in hiring such new employees could result in delays in our research and development activities and would harm our business. As our development and commercialization plans and strategies develop, and as we transition into operating as a public company, we expect to need additional managerial, operational, sales, marketing, financial and other personnel, as well as additional facilities to expand our operations.

If we are not able to effectively expand our organization by hiring new employees and expanding our groups of consultants and contractors, or we are not able to effectively build out new facilities to accommodate this expansion, we may not be able to successfully implement the tasks necessary to further develop and commercialize our current or future product candidates and, accordingly, may not achieve our research, development and commercialization goals.

We will incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to compliance activities and initiatives.

As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting, and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. We are now subject to the reporting requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which requires, among other things, that we file with the SEC, annual, quarterly, and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”), as well as rules subsequently adopted by the SEC and the Nasdaq Capital Market to implement provisions of SOX, impose significant requirements on public companies, including requiring establishment and maintenance of effective disclosure and financial controls and changes in corporate governance practices.

Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, these rules and regulations make it more difficult and more expensive for us to obtain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced policy limits and coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain the same or similar coverage. As a result, it may be more difficult for us to attract and retain qualified persons to serve on our Board of Directors, our Board committees or as executive officers.

SOX requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures. As a result, we are required to periodically perform an evaluation of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of those controls, as required by Section 404 of SOX. These efforts to comply with Section 404 will require the commitment of significant financial and managerial resources. While we anticipate maintaining the integrity of our internal control over financial reporting and all other aspects of Section 404, we cannot be certain that a material weakness will not be identified when we test the effectiveness of our control systems in the future. If a material weakness is identified, we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources, costly litigation or a loss of public confidence in our internal control, which could have an adverse effect on the market price of our stock.

Our business and operations would suffer in the event of computer system failures, cyber-attacks, or deficiencies in our or third parties’ cybersecurity.

We are increasingly dependent upon information technology systems, infrastructure, and data to operate our business. In the ordinary course of business, we may collect, store, and transmit confidential information, including, but not limited to, information related to our intellectual property and proprietary business information, personal information, and other confidential information. We have outsourced elements of our operations to third party vendors, who each have access to our confidential information, which increases our disclosure risk. Although we have implemented internal security and business continuity measures, our information technology and other internal infrastructure systems may breakdown, incur damage or be interrupted by system malfunctions, natural disasters, terrorism, war, or telecommunication and electrical failures, as well as by inadvertent or intentional security breaches by our employees, contractors, consultants, business partners, and/or other third parties, or from cyber-attacks by malicious third parties, each of which could compromise our system infrastructure or lead to the loss, destruction, alteration, disclosure, or dissemination of, or damage or unauthorized access to, our data or other assets. Such a security breach may cause loss, damage, or disclosure of proprietary or confidential information, which could in turn result in significant legal and financial exposure and reputational damage that could adversely affect our business. Furthermore, the loss or corruption of clinical trial data from future clinical trials may result in delays in our regulatory approval efforts and could significantly increase our costs to recover or reproduce the data.

The costs related to significant security breaches or disruptions could be material and our insurance policies may not be adequate to compensate us for the potential losses arising from any such security breach. In addition, such insurance may not be available to us on economically reasonable terms, if at all, may not cover all claims made against us, and may have high deductibles. Furthermore, if the information technology systems of our third-party vendors and other contractors and consultants become subject to disruptions or security breaches, we may have insufficient recourse against such third parties and we may have to expend significant resources to mitigate the impact of such an event, and to develop and implement protections to prevent future events of this nature from occurring.

If any of our current or future product candidates do not achieve broad market acceptance among physicians, patients, healthcare payors and the medical community, the revenues from any such current or future product candidate may be limited.

The use of precision medicines as a potential cancer treatment is a recent development and may not become broadly accepted by physicians, patients, hospitals, cancer treatment centers, and others in the medical community. We cannot predict whether physicians, patients, hospitals, cancer treatment centers, and government agencies or third-party payors will determine that our product is safe, therapeutically effective, and cost effective as compared with competing treatments. If our current or potential future product candidates do not achieve an adequate level of market acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenues and may not become profitable. Factors influencing acceptance of our current or future product candidates in the market, include: the clinical indications for which our product candidates are licensed; whether our product candidates are viewed as a safe and effective treatment; our ability to demonstrate our product’s advantages, including cost advantages, over alternative treatments; the prevalence and severity of any side effects of our products and of other precision medicines; product labeling or product insert requirements of the FDA or other regulatory authorities and limitations or warnings contained in the labeling; the timing of market introduction of our product candidates and competitive products; patient willingness to pay out-of-pocket in the absence of coverage by third-party payors and government authorities; and the effectiveness of our sales and marketing efforts.

If our current or future product candidates are licensed but fail to achieve market acceptance among physicians, patients, hospitals, cancer treatment centers or others in the medical community, we will not be able to generate significant revenue. In addition, although our current or future product candidates may differ in certain ways from other precision medicine approaches, serious adverse events or deaths in other preclinical or clinical trials involving precision medicines, even if not ultimately attributable to our current or future products or product candidates, could result in increased government regulation, unfavorable public perception and publicity, potential regulatory delays in the testing or licensing of our current or future product candidates, stricter labeling requirements for those product candidates that are licensed, and a decrease in demand for any such product candidates.

If product liability lawsuits are brought against us, we may incur substantial liabilities and may be required to limit commercialization of our current or future product candidates.

We face an inherent risk of costly and time-consuming product liability lawsuits as a result of the planned clinical testing of our current or future product candidates and will face an even greater risk if we commercialize any products. For example, we may be sued if our current or future product candidates cause or are perceived to cause injury or are found to be otherwise unsuitable during clinical testing, manufacturing, marketing or sale. If we cannot successfully defend ourselves against product liability claims, we may incur substantial liabilities or be required to limit commercialization of our current or future product candidates. Failure to obtain or retain sufficient product liability insurance at an acceptable cost may prevent or inhibit the commercialization of products we may develop. Although we have clinical trial insurance, our insurance policies have various exclusions, and we may be subject to a claim for which we have no coverage. We may have to pay any amounts awarded by a court or negotiated in a settlement that are not covered by or which exceed our insurance coverage, and we may not have sufficient capital to pay such amounts.

We do not know whether an active, liquid and orderly trading market will develop for our Common Stock or what the market price of our Common Stock will be and, as a result, it may be difficult for you to sell your shares of our Common Stock.

Prior to the pricing of our initial public offering on February 4, 2022, there was no public trading market for shares of our Common Stock. Although our Common Stock is listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market, an active trading market for our shares is still developing and may not be sustained in the future. The lack of an active market for our Common Stock may impair investors’ ability to sell their shares at the time they wish to sell them or at a price that they consider reasonable and may reduce the fair market value of their shares. Further, an inactive market may impair our ability to raise capital by selling shares of our Common Stock and to enter into strategic partnerships or acquire companies or products using our shares of Common Stock as consideration.

Our business is affected by global and local economic and political conditions as well as the state of the financial markets, inflation, recession, financial liquidity, currency volatility, growth, and policy initiatives. There can be no assurance that global economic conditions and financial markets will not worsen and that we will not experience any adverse effects that may be material to our consolidated cash flows, results of operations, financial position or our ability to access capital, such as the adverse effects resulting from a prolonged shutdown in government operations both in the United States and internationally. Political changes, including war or other conflicts, some of which may be disruptive, could interfere with our supply chain, our customers and all of our activities in a particular location.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future, so any returns will be limited to the value of our stock, which may be volatile.

We plan to retain future earnings for the development, operation, and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. Any return to stockholders will be limited to the appreciation of their stock, which may never occur. Further, the trading price of our Common Stock is likely to be highly volatile and may be subject to wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control. Broad market and industry factors may negatively affect the market price of our Common Stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.

If equity research analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they publish negative evaluations of or downgrade our Common Stock, the price of our Common Stock could decline.

The trading market for our Common Stock relies in part on the research and reports that equity research analysts publish about us or our business. We do not control these analysts. We may never obtain research coverage by industry or financial analysts. If no or few analysts publish research reports on the Company or if analysts publish negative research reports about the Company, our stock price may significantly decline.

The holders of our Common Stock will suffer, and may in the future suffer, substantial dilution due to the Private Placement and our corporate financing practices.

Assuming the issuance of the Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the pre-funded warrants and investment options, together with the issuance of Common Stock pursuant to the Private Placement, the holders of our Common Stock will suffer substantial dilution. Holders of our Common Stock could suffer additional, substantial dilution in the future due to our corporate financing practices. These additional issuances of shares of Common Stock could also cause a significant reduction in the market price of our Common Stock.

Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations, or require us to relinquish rights to our current or future technologies or product candidates.

We may seek additional capital through a combination of public and private equity offerings, debt financings, strategic partnerships and alliances and licensing arrangements. Any equity or equity-related financing may dilute our stockholders may subject us to restrictive covenants and interest costs. If we obtain funding through a strategic collaboration or licensing arrangement, we may be required to relinquish our rights to our current product candidates or any future product candidates that we may develop.

Additional fundraising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our operations. If we are unable to raise additional capital as needed or on acceptable terms, we may be required to delay or discontinue any research, development or commercialization programs and may be unable to expand our operations or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities. Further, we may be required to seek collaborators for potential product candidates earlier, or on less favorable terms, than might otherwise be desired, or to relinquish or license our rights to potential product candidates in markets where we otherwise would seek to pursue development or commercialization. Any of the above events could significantly harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations and cause the price of our Common Stock to decline.

Future issuances of our Common Stock or securities convertible into our Common Stock, or the expiration of lock-up agreements that restrict the issuance of new Common Stock or the trading of outstanding stock, could cause the market price of our Common Stock to decline and would result in the dilution of your shareholding.

Future issuances of our Common Stock or securities convertible into our Common Stock or the trading of outstanding stock, could cause the market price of our Common Stock to decline. We cannot predict the effect, if any, of the exercise of future issuances of our Common Stock or securities convertible into our Common Stock on the price of our Common Stock. In all events, future issuances of our Common Stock would result in the dilution of your shareholding.

Our principal stockholders and management own a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant influence over matters subject to stockholder approval.

As of June 30, 2022, our executive officers, directors, and 5% stockholders beneficially owned approximately 70% of our voting stock and anticipate that the same group will hold a significant portion of our outstanding voting stock for the foreseeable future. These stockholders will have the ability to influence us through their ownership position. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our Common Stock.

Our failure to meet the continuing listing requirements of the NASDAQ Capital Market could result in a de-listing of our securities.

If we fail to satisfy the continuing listing requirements of NASDAQ, such as the corporate governance, stockholders’ equity or minimum closing bid price requirements, NASDAQ may take steps to delist our Common Stock. Such a delisting would likely have a negative effect on the price of our Common Stock and would impair our stockholders’ ability to sell or purchase our Common Stock. In the event of a delisting, we would likely take actions to restore our compliance with NASDAQ’s listing requirements, but we can provide no assurance that any such action taken by us would allow our Common Stock to become listed again, stabilize the market price or improve the liquidity of our securities, prevent our Common Stock from dropping below the NASDAQ minimum bid price requirement or prevent future non-compliance with NASDAQ’s listing requirements.

We are an emerging growth company and a smaller reporting company, and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies and smaller reporting companies will make our Common Stock less attractive to investors.

We are an emerging growth company, as defined in the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including: exemption from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of SOX, as amended; being permitted to provide only two years of our audited financial statements and correspondingly reduced “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”; exemption from any Public Company Accounting Oversight Board requirement regarding audit firm rotation or an auditor report supplement providing additional information about the audit and financial statements; reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation; and exemption from the nonbinding advisory votes on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.

We have elected to take advantage of certain of the reduced reporting obligations. We cannot predict whether investors will find our Common Stock less attractive if we rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our Common Stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our Common Stock and our stock price may be reduced or more volatile.

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, and Delaware law may discourage, delay, or prevent a change in control of our Company or changes in our management and, as a result, depress the trading price of our stock.

Provisions of our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws and Delaware law may deter unsolicited takeovers and/or delay or prevent a change in control of our Company, including transactions in which our stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares.

In addition, the Delaware General Corporation Law prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination with an interested stockholder, defined as a person who owns, or within the last three years has owned, 15% of our voting stock, for a period of three years after the date of the transaction in which the person became an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner.

The foregoing provisions and anti-takeover measures may limit the price that investors might be willing to pay in the future for shares of our Common Stock and may deter potential acquirers of our Company.

We are not selling any securities under this prospectus and we will not receive any proceeds from the sale of securities by the Selling Shareholders, although we could receive up to $19,764,147 upon the exercise of all of the Investment Options and $909 upon the exercise of all of the Pre-Funded Warrants. Any amounts we receive from such exercises, along with approximately $15.9 million in net proceeds received in the Private Placement will be used for working capital and general corporate purposes. The holders of the Investment Options and Pre-Funded Warrants are currently not obligated to exercise the Investment Options or Pre-Funded Warrants and we cannot assure you that the holders of either will choose to exercise all or any exercise the Investment Option or Pre-Funded Warrants.

We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our capital stock. We currently intend to retain any future earnings to fund the development and expansion of our business, and therefore we do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

Currently, our shares of Common Stock are listed on the Nasdaq Capital Market under the symbol “NVCT”.

As of the date of this prospectus, there were 53 holders of record of our shares of Common Stock.

We have not paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock and do not plan to pay any cash dividends on our Common Stock in the foreseeable future. Our board of directors will determine our future dividend policy on the basis of many factors, including results of operations, capital requirements, and general business conditions, subject to any restrictions under our credit facility.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with our financial statements and related notes incorporated by reference in this prospectus. Some of the information contained in this discussion and analysis or set forth elsewhere in this prospectus, including information with respect to our plans and strategy for our business and related financing, includes forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. As a result of many factors, including those factors set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of this prospectus, our actual results could differ materially from the results described in or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in the following discussion and analysis.

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of novel targeted small molecule therapeutics for the treatment of cancer in genetically defined patient populations. Our precision medicine approach translates key scientific insights relating to the oncogenic drivers and pathway addiction of cancer into potent and highly selective anticancer drugs. In addition, we will investigate the relevance of specific mutations and other DNA alterations as a potential patient selection marker and to identify synthetic lethality targets. This work could support our use of a tumor agnostic development strategy wherein we enroll patients based on the cancer’s genetic and molecular features without regard to the type or location of the cancer. Since our inception in 2020, we have devoted substantially all of our efforts and financial resources to organizing and staffing our company, business planning, raising capital, acquiring, discovering product candidates and securing related intellectual property rights and conducting research and development activities for our programs. We do not have any products approved for sale and have not generated any revenue from product sales. We may never be able to develop or commercialize a marketable product. We have not yet successfully completed any pivotal clinical trials, obtained any regulatory approvals, manufactured a commercial-scale drug, or conducted sales and marketing activities.

From our inception on July 27, 2020, through June 30, 2022, we did not generate any revenue. Our main activities through June 30, 2022 have been organizational and capital raising activities and the completion of the in-license agreements for our two drug candidates, NXP800 and NXP900, our Initial New Drug and Clinical Trial Application for the FDA and Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Agency, respectively, and preparation and ongoing execution of the Phase 1a clinical trial for NXP800, which commenced in December 2021, and beginning our IND-enabling studies for NXP900, which commenced in late 2021. Additionally, we completed our initial public offering in February 2022.

Research and development expenses include costs directly attributable to the conduct of research and development programs, including licensing fees, cost of salaries, share-based compensation expenses, payroll taxes, and other employee benefits, subcontractors, and materials and service used for research and development activities, including clinical trials, manufacturing costs, and professional services. All costs associated with research and development are expensed as incurred.

Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. We expect that our research and development expenses will increase substantially in connection with our ongoing and planned preclinical and clinical development activities in the near term and in the future. The successful development of our product candidates is highly uncertain. At this time, we cannot accurately estimate or know the nature, timing and costs of the efforts that will be necessary to complete the preclinical and clinical development of any of our product candidates and we may never succeed in obtaining regulatory approval for any of our product candidates.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and personnel-related costs, including stock-based compensation, for our personnel in executive, finance and accounting, and other administrative functions. General and administrative expenses also include legal fees relating to patent and corporate matters; professional fees paid for accounting, auditing, consulting, and tax services; insurance costs; travel expenses; and facility costs not otherwise included in research and development expenses.

We anticipate that our general and administrative expenses will increase in the future as we increase our headcount to support our continued research and development activities.

The tables below also appear in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on August 10, 2022.

The following table summarizes our results of operations expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and the three months ended June 30, 2021: (in thousands)

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and the three months ended June 30, 2021: (in thousands)

Research and development expenses decreased by $1.7 million or 41% during the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021. The decrease in research and development expense during the three months ended June 30, 2022 was primarily driven by $3.5 million in one-time licensing fees expense and paid during the period in 2021 for compound NXP800 partially offset by $1.1 million in increased clinical expenses, $0.4 in manufacturing expenses mostly related to the NXP800 program and $0.2 million of additional employee expenses including $0.3 million in employee stock compensation.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following table summarizes our general and administrative expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2022 and the three months ended June 30, 2021: (in thousands)

General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.6 million or 37% during the three months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021. The decrease in general and administrative expense during the three months ended June 30, 2022 was primarily driven by the $0.9 million decrease in professional and consulting services related to the private funding round in 2021 which could not be netted against the proceeds, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase in insurance and other expenses associated with the IPO.

As a result of the foregoing, our loss from operations for the three months ended June 30, 2022, decreased $2.4 million or 40%, compared to the same period in 2021.

The following table summarizes our results of operations expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and the six months ended June 30, 2021: (in thousands)

The following table summarizes our research and development expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and the six months ended June 30, 2021: (in thousands)

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Research and development expenses increased by $0.1 million, or 2%, during the six months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021. The increase in research and development expense during the six months ended June 30, 2022 was primarily driven by, $1.6 million increase in clinical expenses paid out in connection with our product candidates NXP800 and NXP900, $0.6 million in employee compensation and benefits including $0.4 million in stock based compensation and $0.7 million in manufacturing expenses mostly associated with our product NXP800 and $0.2 million in professional services and other expenses associated with the company’s drug product programs, partially offset by a $3.1 million decrease in license fees paid during 2021 to CRT for NXP800 net of fees owed to the UoE associated with the company’s 2022 IPO and the UoE License agreement.

The following table summarizes our general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2022 and the six months ended June 30, 2021: (in thousands)

General and administrative expenses increased by $0.5 million, or 29%, during the six months ended June 30, 2022 compared to the same period in 2021. The increase in general and administrative expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2022, was primarily driven by $0.5 million increase in insurance due to insurance associated with the IPO, $0.2 million in employee compensation including $0.3 million in stock compensation expense offset by a decrease of $0.3 million in professional and consulting fees paid to third-party providers.

As a result of the foregoing, our loss from operations for the six months ended June 30, 2022, increased $0.6 million or 9%, compared to the same period in 2021.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

As of June 30, 2022, we had $13.6 million of cash and cash equivalents. For the three months ended June 30, 2022, and 2021, we had net losses of $3.5 million and $5.9 million, respectively. For the six months ended June 30, 2022, and 2021, we had net losses of $6.5 million and $6.0 million, respectively. As of June 30, 2022, we had an accumulated deficit of $19.4 million.

On February 4, 2022, we entered into an underwriting agreement with H.C. Wainwright & Co. (the “Underwriter”), as sole book-running manager, in connection with our initial public offering of common stock (the “IPO”). On February 4, 2022, we announced the pricing of our IPO of 3,200,000 shares of common stock for a price of $5.00 per share, less certain underwriting discounts and commissions. We will pay UoE 2.5% of the gross amount of each of the Company’s future fund raisings up to a cumulative total of $3.0 million, including this $0.4 million.

The IPO closed on February 8, 2022, with gross proceeds of $16.0 million, before deducting underwriting discounts and expenses (for net proceeds of $12.6 million).

In addition, on July 29, 2022, we completed a private placement in which we received gross proceeds of $15.9 million before deducting fees and expenses (for net proceeds of $14.2 million). We believe that the proceeds from our IPO and private placement will enable us to fund our operating expenses and capital expenditures into the second half of 2024. We have based this estimate on assumptions that may prove to be wrong, and we could exhaust our available capital resources sooner than we expect. Our future viability in the long term is dependent on our ability to raise additional capital to finance our operations.

We expect our expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we advance the preclinical activities and clinical trials of our current or future product candidates, including payments of milestones and sponsored research commitments associated with our license agreements for NXP800 and NXP900. In addition, now that we have closed our initial public, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company, including significant legal, accounting, investor relations and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. The timing and amount of our operating expenditures will depend largely on our ability to:

We anticipate that we will require additional capital as we seek regulatory approval of our product candidates and if we choose to pursue in-licenses or acquisitions of other product candidates. If we receive regulatory approval for our other future product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product manufacturing, sales, marketing and distribution, depending on where we choose to commercialize.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with research, development and commercialization of our product candidates, we are unable to estimate the exact amount of our working capital requirements. Our future funding requirements will depend on and could increase significantly as a result of many factors, including:

Until such time, if ever, as we can generate substantial product revenue, we expect to finance our operations through a combination of public or private equity offerings, debt financings, governmental funding, collaborations, strategic partnerships and alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible debt securities, your ownership interest may be materially diluted, and the terms of such securities could include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect your rights as a common stockholder. Debt financing and preferred equity financing, if available, may involve agreements that include restrictive covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. In addition, debt financing would result in fixed payment obligations.

If we raise additional funds through governmental funding, collaborations, strategic partnerships and alliances or marketing, distribution or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our technologies, future revenue streams, research programs or product candidates or grant licenses on terms that may not be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings or other arrangements when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our research, product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop and market product candidates that we would otherwise prefer to develop and market ourselves.

We enter into contracts in the normal course of business with clinical research organizations, contract manufacturing organizations, and other third parties for clinical trials, preclinical research studies, and testing and manufacturing services. These contracts are cancelable by us upon prior written notice. Payments due upon cancellation consist only of payments for services provided or expenses incurred, including noncancelable obligations of our service providers, up to the date of cancellation. The amount and timing of such payments are not known.

We have also entered into license and collaboration agreements with third parties, which are in the normal course of business. We have not included future payments under these agreements since obligations under these agreements are contingent upon future events such as our achievement of specified development, regulatory, and commercial milestones, or royalties on net product sales.

Pursuant to the NXP800 License Agreement, we are required to make payments to the ICR for certain development and regulatory milestones. As of June 30, 2022, we were obligated to pay up to $23.0 million in milestone payments to the ICR related to pre-approval milestones, up to $178 million (in addition to the $23.0 million) in regulatory and commercial sales milestones, and mid-single digit to 10% royalties on a tiered basis on net sales. Additionally, the Company originally agreed to provide the ICR with up to an additional $0.5 million in research and development. On March 31, 2022, the Company and ICR agreed to research and development support of an additional $0.4 million ($0.9 million total).

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Pursuant to the NXP900 License Agreement, we are required to make payments to the UoE for certain development and regulatory milestones. As of June 30, 2022, we were obligated to make up to $46.0 million in milestone payments to the UoE related to pre-approval milestones, including $0.5 million on the first anniversary of the agreement, up to $279.50 million in regulatory and commercial sales milestones, mid-single digit to 8% royalties on a tiered basis on net sales and 2.5% of the gross amount of each of the Company’s future fund raising up to a cumulative total of $3.0 million. Additionally, the Company will provide UoE with up to an additional $754,000 in research and development support.

We do not currently have any long-term leases. We rent our office space in Fort Lee, New Jersey based on a one-year agreement signed on May 1, 2022.

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, costs and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in Note 2 to our financial statements included in our Form 10-K filed with the SEC on March 23, 2022 which is incorporated herein by reference. The preparation of the Company’s financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses in the Company’s financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant estimates in the Company’s financial statements relate to accruals for research and development expenses, valuation of equity awards, and valuation allowances for deferred tax assets. These estimates and assumptions are based on current facts, future expectations, and various other factors believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the recording of expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ materially and adversely from these estimates.

Our financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of our financial statements and related disclosures requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, costs and expenses. We base our estimates on historical experience, known trends and events and various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis. Our actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012 permits an “emerging growth company” such as us to take advantage of an extended transition period to comply with new or revised accounting standards applicable to public companies until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have elected to not “opt out” of this provision and, as a result, we will adopt new or revised accounting standards at the time private companies adopt the new or revised accounting standard and will do so until such time that we either (i) irrevocably elect to “opt out” of such extended transition period or (ii) no longer qualify as an emerging growth company.

We are also a “smaller reporting company” meaning that the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million and our annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year. We may continue to be a smaller reporting company after this offering if either (i) the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $250 million or (ii) our annual revenue was less than $100 million during the most recently completed fiscal year and the market value of our stock held by non-affiliates is less than $700 million. If we are a smaller reporting company at the time we cease to be an emerging growth company, we may continue to rely on exemptions from certain disclosure requirements that are available to smaller reporting companies. Specifically, as a smaller reporting company we may choose to present only the two most recent fiscal years of audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and, similar to emerging growth companies, smaller reporting companies have reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation.

We are a biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of innovative precision medicines for the treatment of serious unmet medical needs in oncology. Our development strategy utilizes a precision medicine-based approach that translates key scientific insights relating to oncogenic drivers, pathway addiction and other cancer-promoting factors into selective and potent anticancer drugs.

A new generation of approved targeted therapies, such as kinase inhibitors, have transformed the treatment of cancer and demonstrated a significant benefit to certain patients with genetically defined tumor types. In turn, improved genetic sequencing has led to the discovery of additional cancer-promoting genetic alterations that were previously unknown, unaddressed, unsuccessfully targeted or overlooked.

We believe that these advancements provide the basis for modern development of targeted therapies that will enable the discovery and development of anticancer treatments based on genetic characterization of tumors rather than tumor histology.

Nuvectis was founded and is led by an experienced management team with extensive drug development expertise. Our three co-founders have significant drug development knowledge and experience, and a demonstrated track record of success including four past FDA approvals of novel medications in both oncologic and non-oncologic indications and additional approvals in Europe and Japan.

Our mission is to develop a portfolio of innovative product candidates for the treatment of cancer. We rely on our core competencies of target selection, drug profiling, licensing, and clinical and regulatory execution to build a pipeline of anticancer drugs. We plan to continue to collaborate with best-in-class technology partners that we believe have the capability to discover selective and potent compounds with desirable pharmacologic properties.

We apply our deep understanding of how genetic alterations lead to the development, growth and spread of cancer. This understanding, combined with our knowledge of the underlying unmet clinical needs, informs and enables our development of an effective clinical and regulatory strategy. We believe that our combination of clinical development and preclinical research expertise, could improve the potential for clinical, regulatory, and commercial success.

With our focus on precision medicine, we aim to pharmacologically target oncogenic drivers, such as certain kinases that are mutated, overexpressed, or overactive, in cases where such alterations to the oncogene result in hyperactivation of pro-malignant signaling pathways, and non-oncogenic addiction targets, such as support genes required for the survival of cancer cells. Our approach could enable the use of biomarker-driven patient selection, which could prospectively identify patients that are more likely to benefit from our targeted therapy, a type of cancer treatment that precisely identifies and attacks a specific pathway of cancer cells, thereby potentially increasing the likelihood of a successful treatment outcome.

Moreover, we believe that our approach will allow us to potentially improve the time, costs and risks often associated with cancer drug development, and enable us to improve outcomes for patients with cancer.

Nuvectis was founded in 2020 and is led by a highly qualified management team comprised of industry veterans with extensive drug development experience, as well as proven capabilities to raise the capital necessary to support clinical development. Our three co-founders, Ron Bentsur, Enrique Poradosu, PhD., and Shay Shemesh, have extensive experience and a proven track record of successful drug development including four past FDA approvals of novel medications in both oncologic and non-oncologic indications and additional approvals in Europe and Japan.

Collectively, the three co-founders of Nuvectis held leadership roles in four FDA approvals and launches of novel medications in both oncologic and non-oncologic indication, including three NDAs and one BLA, as well as two approvals in the EU, and one approval in Japan (via a Japanese partner). Our co-founders successfully led the approvals and launches of: Auryxia^®, which is used for the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (“CKD”) and for the treatment of anemia in patients with non-dialysis-dependent CKD; Jelmyto^®, which is used for the treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma; and Elzonris^®, which is used for the treatment of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm. Notably, significant regulatory achievements also include obtaining two Breakthrough Therapy Designations in oncology and six Orphan Drug Designations (four in the U.S. and two in the EU) and two Fast Track Designations.

Ron Bentsur (56), Co-Founder, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Nuvectis, has over 20 years of senior leadership experience in the biotechnology industry. He served as CEO of UroGen Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: URGN) from August 2015 until January 2019, and as CEO of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: KERX, acquired by Akebia Therapeutics) from May 2009 until May 2015. At UroGen and Keryx, Mr. Bentsur led the clinical development, regulatory approvals and the commercial infrastructure buildouts for the US commercial launches of Jelmyto and Auryxia, respectively. Mr. Bentsur also led the establishment of a successful worldwide partnership for an earlier-stage program at UroGen and an ex-US development partnership for Auryxia at Keryx. Mr. Bentsur served as CEO of XTL Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: XTLB) from January 2006 until April 2009 and as Investor Relations and CFO of Keryx from October 2000 until January 2006. Mr. Bentsur worked as an investment banker in NYC and Tel Aviv, Israel, from 1994 until 2000. Mr. Bentsur served as a member of the Board of Directors of Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. from 2009 through the approval and launch of Elzonris^® and through the subsequent acquisition of the company by Menarini in June 2020, and serves on the Board of Directors of Beyond Air, Inc. (NASDAQ: XAIR). Mr. Bentsur holds a BA in Economics and Business Administration with distinction from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel and an MBA (Magna Cum Laude), from New York University’s Stern School of Business.

Enrique Poradosu, PhD (56), Co-Founder, Executive Vice President, Chief Scientific and Business Officer of Nuvectis, has over 20 years of senior scientific leadership experience in the biotechnology industry. From 2016 until 2020, he served as SVP, Business and Scientific Strategy at Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: STML, acquired by Menarini in June 2020). At Stemline Dr. Poradosu led the licensing and scientific strategy of the company’s pipeline, as well as directly leading strategic planning and operational execution of the early-stage drug development programs. Prior to that, Dr. Poradosu served as VP Business and Scientific Strategy at Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: KERX, acquired by Akebia Therapeutics), from 2003 until 2016. From 1998 until 2003, Dr. Poradosu served as a project manager at a private biomedical incubator.

Dr. Poradosu holds a BSc in Chemistry and Biology with distinction from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel and a PhD in Biochemistry, from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Shay Shemesh (39), Co-Founder, Executive Vice President, Chief Development & Operations Officer of Nuvectis, has over 15 years of multi-disciplinary experience in drug development. From 2015 until 2020, he served as SVP, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs at Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: STML, acquired by Menarini in June 2020) where he led multi-disciplinary development teams in early and late-stage projects. In this role, Mr. Shemesh held responsibilities for the strategic planning and operational execution of the Elzonris^® clinical program and Biologics License Application, with the FDA and Marketing Authorization Application with EMA, resulting in the approval of Elzonris™ in both regions for the treatment of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm, an orphan hematologic malignancy. Prior to that, Mr. Shemesh was a clinical operations lead at Keryx Biopharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: KERX, acquired by Akebia Therapeutics), where he managed the late-stage clinical trials for Auryxia™ for the treatment of anemia in patients with non- dialysis CKD, which led to the approval of Auryxia in this indication in the US and the EU. Mr. Shemesh holds a BSc and MSc in Biotechnology from Bar Ilan University in Israel.

Michael Carson (46), Vice President of Finance, has over 20 years of broad experience in corporate finance, accounting, and operations. He specializes in clinical stage biopharmaceutical and biotechnology companies. From late 2019 until 2021, he served as Vice President of Finance at XyloCor Theraputics, Inc. where he led the accounting, treasury and finance functions. During 2019, Mr. Carson consulted for Smiths Medical, Inc., a division of Smiths Group, as Global Controller along with serving as Vice President of Finance in a consulting role for several other biopharmaceutical and medical device companies. At Smiths Medical, he led a team responsible for accounting, treasury and foreign currency exposure. From 2015 to 2019 he served as Director of Financial Planning and Analysis at Neuronetics (NASDAQ: STIM). In this role, Mr. Carson served as the second in command to the Chief Financial Officer and held responsibilities for strategic planning, financial execution, investor relations, and controllership. In the past, he has held several finance and accounting positions at Abbott Laboratories (NYSE: ABT) and served as an auditor at Crowe LLP and Deloitte. Mr. Carson holds a Bachelor of Arts in Business and Economics along with a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Lafayette College in Pennsylvania. He is a licensed Certified Public Accountant in the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.

We have licensed exclusive world-wide commercial rights to NXP800, our lead product candidate, which was developed at the world-renowned Institute for Cancer Research (“ICR”) in London, England. The ICR is a pioneer in discovery of new anti-cancer agents with unique mechanisms of action. The ICR’s drug discovery unit has discovered several successful product candidates, the most notable of which is Zytiga, a leading drug for metastatic prostate cancer. Our license agreement with the ICR is subject to certain milestone and royalty payments. For additional information see section “NXP800 License Agreement”.

NXP800 is an inhibitor of the Heat Shock Factor 1 (“HSF1”) pathway. A large body of work has verified the importance of HSF1 to tumorigenesis and progression in a variety of malignancies. Cancer cells actively exploit HSF1 to overcome diverse stresses and promote biological activities crucial for the survival, progression, immune evasion, and metastasis. This utilization of the HSF1 pathway by the cancer cell in order to overcome stress is also referred to as an HSF1 addiction. It was hypothesized that inhibiting the HSF1 pathway would substantially impede the survival of cancer cells. This hypothesis led to the discovery of NXP800.

In preclinical studies, treatment with NXP800 inhibited tumor growth in human xenografts of ovarian cancer. In addition, we identified a gene signature related to a mutation in the AT-Rich Interaction Domain (“ARID1a”) gene that has potential to serve as a biomarker for patient selection in ovarian and other cancer types. Based on this work, we plan to initially study the potential efficacy of NXP800 in Ovarian Clear Cell Carcinoma (“OCCC”) and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, and to investigate the use of ARID1a mutations as a potential patient selection marker for additional types of cancer. The genetic screening for the ARID1a mutation is a standard part of the commercially available screening panels being utilized in the clinic for cancer patients.

A comprehensive preclinical data package comprised of pharmacology, pharmacokinetic, and toxicological and other safety studies required as part of an IND Application to the FDA and a CTA to the MHRA for the initiation of a first in human (FIH), Phase 1, clinical study of NXP800 were completed by the ICR and by third-party certified labs, supported the approval of the CTA by the MHRA. In preclinical and toxicology studies no meaningful off-target effects were observed when screened against a broad panel of kinases, bromodomains, GPCRs, orphan receptors, and nuclear hormone receptors. In December 2021, we announced the commencement of the Phase 1 study for NXP800. The Phase 1 study is comprised of two parts: dose-escalation Phase 1a, initiated in December 2021, followed by an expansion Phase 1b. In the Phase 1a, the safety and tolerability of NXP800 are evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors to identify a dose and dosing schedule for the Phase 1b. In June 2022 we announced that the FDA had accepted the IND for NXP800 and the phase 1a study is currently enrolling patients both in the U.S. and U.K. In the Phase 1b, the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of NXP800 will be evaluated in biomarker- selected patients, initially in ovarian clear cell carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma harboring the ARID1a mutation and possibly cohorts of patients with additional types of solid tumors. Moreover, additional preclinical studies are being conducted in order to assess the preclinical efficacy of NXP800 in additional solid tumor types.

Our clinical development strategy employs a stepwise approach designed to identify signals of activity early in development. In our exploratory clinical trials, we plan to treat patients whose tumors harbor a specific genetic alteration, the ARID1a mutation. We believe that this patient enrichment approach improves the likelihood of demonstrating clinical benefit and providing meaningful insight into a product candidate’s therapeutic potential.

Living cells possess different mechanisms that allow them to adapt to stressful factors in their environment. These cellular mechanisms involve alterations in metabolism, as well as in signal transduction, transcription, translation, protein packaging and/or release. The initial cellular response against a harmful factor is aimed at defense. If the damaging signals are too severe and cause irreversible injury, cells activate death signaling pathways. The activation of protective or destructive pathways depends to a large extent on the nature and duration of the stress, as well as the cell type involved. The final fate of the stressed cell depends on the interplay between these responses. Carcinogenesis is a complex multi-step process involving metabolic and functional changes enabling transformed cells to survive and adapt to the tumor microenvironment. Most cancers are associated with various genetic and epigenetic changes leading to the malfunctioning of critical genes. However, cancer cells also depend on the normal functioning of certain genes. As such, activation of specific cytoprotective mechanisms can support the survival of transformed cells.

One of the main pro-survival responses, a factor promoting the survival of a cell, that protect cancer cells from stress is the transcription factor HSF1, which plays a dominant role in the cellular response to the oncogenic stress imposed on the cancer cell, such as proteotoxic oxidative stress (an imbalance of free radicals and antioxidants resulting from increased metabolic rate of the cancer cell), and acidification of the microenvironment as well as heavy metals such as iron, all of which are relevant to the etiology of our initial targeted indications. A large body of work has verified the importance of HSF1 to tumorigenesis and cancer progression.

HSF1 can also be considered as one of the guardians of the cellular proteome, or the pool of proteins within a cell. It has been found that HSF1 normally regulates a subset of genes involved in the control of cell proliferation, the process that results in an increase of the number of cells and cell cycle progression, and also extends the survival of transformed cells. Consequently, cancer cells may become dependent upon, or addicted to, HSF1. Although HSF1 is neither a tumor suppressor nor a typical oncogene, it affects many aspects of cellular metabolism that are important for the cancer phenotype by modulating signaling pathways associated with growth and proliferation, apoptosis, glucose metabolism, angiogenesis, cell motility, and the response to the proteotoxic stress in the tumor microenvironment (See Figure 7).

Legend: HSF1 is actively exploited by cancer cells to overcome diverse stresses and to promote biological activities crucial for cancer survival, progression, immune evasion and metastasis.

Additionally, HSF1’s activity has been found to modulate signaling pathways that are altered through the expression of mutant oncogenic proteins, thus affecting the phenotype of cancer cells. This phenomenon has been referred to as non-oncogenic addiction, based on the observation that cancer cells are more dependent on the chaperoning function of HSPs than normal cells. Thus, the HSF1 pathway is a compelling oncology target, which led to the discovery of the NXP800 strategy.

NXP800 emerged from a phenotypic screen for antagonists of the HSF1-mediated transcriptional response. In phenotypic screens, small molecules undergo high-throughput screening against intact cells, and discrete phenotypic changes in the cell are measured and quantified. Phenotypic screens are unbiased and have several advantages over screens using recombinant proteins. Hits from a phenotypic screen will, by definition, be cell permeable and have cellular activity, potentially reducing optimization cycles and timelines. The ICR screening led to the identification of the bisamide series, and further optimization of the series led to the identification of NXP800, which was selected as the clinical drug candidate.

Beyond the initial target indications of OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, we believe that NXP800 has the potential to demonstrate anti-tumor activity in several additional tumor types, such as endometrial, breast, lung, gastrointestinal, hepatocellular, esophageal and others. Preclinical work is currently being conducted to investigate the use of ARID1a mutation as a potential patient selection marker in additional tumor types. This work could support our use of a tumor-agnostic development strategy (see Figure 6) wherein we enroll patients based on the cancer’s genetic and molecular features without regard to the type or location of the cancer. We expect to provide preclinical and clinical data updates at key medical conferences in 2022.

Using gene expression microarray analysis, we have identified a gene signature that may indicate the sensitivity of specific cancer mutations to NXP800 and has potential as a biomarker for patient enrichment. Tumor samples from seven different ovarian cancer xenograft model studies were split into two groups based on their response to NXP800 treatment (4/7 responsive and 3/7 non-responsive), with probes required to express at least a two-fold differential in the responsive groups. Treatment with NXP800 in the IGROV-1, OVISE, SK-OV-3 and TOV-21G xenografts showed significant anti-tumor effect (as illustrated in Figure 9 showing data for two of these models). These OCCC and endometrioid ovarian cancer models all harbor a mutation in ARID1a. ARID1a is frequently mutated in solid tumors and is associated with aberrant cell cycle and loss of control of proliferation, allowing cancer cells to achieve an advantage, but at the expense of lowered defenses against oncogenic, cellular and environmental stressors such as oxidative stress (an imbalance of free radicals and antioxidants resulting from increased metabolic rate of the cancer cell), heavy metals and chemotherapy. The cancer cells compensate for this exposure utilizing the cell stress response including increased activity of the HSF1 pathway.

Figure 9: Inhibition of OCCC Tumor Growth in Preclinical In Vivo Models Harboring the ARID1a Mutation

Legend: NXP800 (CCT361814 in the chart) strongly inhibited tumor growth of SKOV3 and Tov-21G OCCC models in vivo

Thus, ARID1a deficiency offers a potential biomarker for a patient enrichment strategy in ovarian and other cancers. ARID1a testing is available in commonly used and commercially available and academic molecular diagnostic panels.

Mutations and epigenetic downregulation, the reduction at the cellular level of the magnitude or rate of a physiological response or a biochemical process, such as the expression of a gene of ARID1a occur in roughly two thirds of all OCCC patients, approximately 40% of all endometrioid ovarian carcinoma patients, as well as in varying percentages in several additional types of cancers. Consequently, the ARID1a mutation provides the potential as a biomarker for patient enrichment strategies in ovarian and other cancer types. Based on this data, we plan to initially study the potential efficacy of NXP800 in OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma in patients harboring the ARID1a mutation. ARID1a is also frequently mutated in additional solid tumors (see Table 2).

We hope to become the first company with an approved drug in relapse/refractory OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma, two unmet medical needs with no approved therapies. Additionally, given the potentially wider role of ARID1a, we believe that NXP800 has substantial potential beyond our initial indications, and we plan to explore additional development approaches to broaden the market opportunities in a variety of solid tumors.

Clinically, it has been observed that OCCC arises predominantly from ovarian endometriotic cysts, which are characterized by repeated bleeding into the cyst cavity during the menstrual cycle. The content of an endometriotic cyst, consisting of old blood, contains a markedly high concentration of free iron. Free iron is a source of reactive oxygen species (“ROS”) and excess iron is associated with cancer development through the induction of persistent oxidative stress (an imbalance of free radicals and antioxidants resulting from increased metabolic rate of the cancer cell) in several organs. Thus, extensive oxidative stress in the endometriotic cyst may contributes to of the development of OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma through induction of DNA damage (see Figure 10 below).

Figure 10: Unique microenvironment within endometriotic cysts may lead to ovarian carcinoma

Legend: Microenvironment with especially high concentration of free iron, derived from blood accumulated in the cyst, causes oxidative stress (“ROS”) and leads to DNA damage. Accumulation of DNA damage over the years eventually leads to development of cancer.

In parallel to the DNA damage, exposure to free iron can also trigger ferroptosis, a newly identified, iron- dependent, regulated cell death mechanism. As described in Figure 11 below, ovarian cancer cells develop an increased capability to overcome ferroptosis, which in turn promotes cancer cell survival, with the HSF1 pathway playing a major role in this protective mechanism.

Several genes were modulated by treatment with NXP800, including known HSF1 target genes such as HSPB1, which is an important pro-survival factor, a factor promoting the survival of a cell, indicating a direct effect on the HSF1 pathway by NXP800. In addition, treatment with NXP800 resulted in upregulation of CHAC-1, whose unique function is the degradation of GSH, a key metabolite in cancer cell protection from stress (see Figure 11 below).

ARID1a has been identified as a tumor suppressor in a broad array of cancers, in which loss of function mutations and protein loss are associated with aberrant cell cycle and loss of control of proliferation at the expense of lowered defenses against oncogenic and microenvironment stress. The cancer cells compensate for this vulnerability in different ways, including by increased activity of the HSF1 pathway. Thus, by inhibiting the HSF1 pathway and downregulating the GSH levels in cancer cells with the ARID1a mutation, NXP800 tips the balance towards cancer cell death, with the cancer cell no longer able to tolerate the increased metabolic and other stresses.

A novel relationship was recently established between ARID1a deficiency and glutathione (“GSH”) metabolism (see Figure 12), showing that reducing antioxidant GSH metabolism is a weakness of ARID1a. Disruption of the SWI/SNF (SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable) complex, of which ARID1a is a key component, is associated with aberrant cell cycle and loss of control of proliferation, therefore, cancer cells achieve an advantage at a price of lowering their defenses against insults from free iron (which as discussed previously is a key stress factor involved in the etiology of OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma).

Reduction of the metabolic pathway leading to GSH generation can be partially balanced in cancer cells by an increase in the activity of the HSF1-HSPB1 axis. The discovery of the link between ARID1a deficiency and reduction of the GSH protective pool has important therapeutic implications for the treatment of ARID1a-deficient tumors, which are susceptible to targeting the HSF1 pathway via synthetically lethality whereby GSH levels are further reduced through the activation of the main enzyme responsible for GSH degradation (“CHAC1”).

Figure 11: CHAC1 and HSPB1 are validated NXP800 Biomarkers and are Key Regulators of Ferroptotic Cell Death

Legend: As the levels of the cystine importer, SLC7A11 are reduced in ARID1a mutations, the cancer cells are increasingly dependent on alternative pathways that are targeted by NXP800 as demonstrated by the validated biomarkers HSPB1 and Chac1

Synthetic lethality is a clinically validated approach to treating cancer which arises when simultaneous deficiencies in a pair of genes result in cell death. However, if the deficiency exists in only one gene, the cell survives. The first examples of a molecular targeted therapeutic exploiting synthetic lethality are the PARP inhibitors, which were first approved in 2016. PARP inhibitors include AstraZeneca and Merck’s Lynparza^®, and Zejula^® from the GlaxoSmithKline unit Tesaro. PARP is a family of proteins involved in essential cellular processes such as DNA repair, genomic stability, and programmed cell death. The synthetic lethality approach represents a way to target lost tumor suppressor genes, which have long evaded drug developers as they cannot be drugged directly. The BRCA mutation is found in approximately 10-15% of the ovarian epithelial cancer, a slightly lower target patient prevalence compared to OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma combined. In 2017, prior to their additional approval in the maintenance setting in ovarian cancer and in breast cancer, global PARP inhibitors revenue in the heavily pretreated, advanced-stage ovarian cancer setting was reported at $461 million. In 2020, following the label expansion, the global PARP inhibitor market was valued at $2.178 billion.

The preclinical data establishing the link between ARID1a deficiency and the overactivation of the HSF1 pathway as a compensation mechanism in cancer cells suggest these cancer cells may be susceptible to a synthetic lethality approach through NXP800’s inhibition of the HSF1 pathway. Synthetic lethality results from the interaction between two genes that cause cell death when both are inactivated, if only one of the pair genes is inactivated, the cell survives. In cancer cells, a certain genetic lesion which has no apparent effect on cell viability can create a vulnerability that enables the pharmacological inhibition of a different target, (a synthetic lethality pair), to kill the cancer cells whereas normal cells (which lack the genetic lesion) are spared the effect of the drug. In cancer cells, one of these genes can be inactivated epigenetically or via mutation; while the other can be inactivated by a drug.

Addressing an Unmet Need in Clear Cell Ovarian Cancer and Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma

We plan to initially investigate NXP800 as a treatment for OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. NXP800 is precisely targeted for women with these diseases who have either the ARID1a mutation or ARID1a epigenetic loss.

OCCC is highly malignant, difficult to treat, and has a very poor survival rate due to frequent recurrence after surgery and first-line treatment. The reported response rate to platinum-based chemotherapy (“PBC”) in patients with relapse/refractory disease is 1%, demonstrating a clear and dire need for a new treatment option for OCCC. OCCC represents approximately 10% of all ovarian cancer cases in the United States, with an annual incidence of approximately 2,200 patients.

Endometrioid ovarian cancer represents approximately 10% of all diagnosed ovarian cancer cases. If diagnosed at early-stage, endometrioid ovarian tumors can typically be resected. However, if diagnosed at later stages, these tumors have a substantially worse prognosis. Advanced, platinum-refractory, endometrioid cancer in the United States represents approximately 30% of the endometrioid ovarian cancer segment. Notwithstanding the initial PBC response in the endometrioid ovarian subset, the progression-free survival at three years for patients diagnosed with stage III/IV endometrioid ovarian cancer is a dismal 20% and for stage III and 0% for stage IV.

OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma are subtypes of epithelial ovarian carcinoma with clinical characteristics that are distinct from those of the most common ovarian carcinoma, high-grade serious ovarian carcinoma. They exhibit a unique biological profile that is markedly different from those of other histologic types. The incidence of OCCC among ovarian cancer patients is higher in East Asia (approximately 25% in Japan), than in Europe and the United States (approximately 10%) (see Table3 below).

Table 3: Estimated Annual Incidence of ARID1a Mutated Patients in OCCC and Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma in Major Markets

We believe that we can become the first company with an approved drug in advanced-stage OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. Our Phase 1 clinical trial of NXP800 commenced in December 2021.

Market Potential/Addressable Patient Population in Additional Solid Tumor Types

Beyond our initial target indications, we believe that NXP800 has the potential to demonstrate anti-tumor activity in several additional tumor types, such as gastric, hepatocellular, esophageal, urothelial carcinoma and others.

ARID1a mutations are present in a number of other cancers, most notably gastric, hepatocellular, and esophageal cancers. These may be investigated as secondary indications (see Table4 below).

Table 4: Examples of estimated annual incidence of patients with advanced-stage solid tumors harboring ARID1a mutations

A comprehensive preclinical data package for NXP800 has been assembled. Preclinical studies of NXP800 conducted were as follows:

The in vivo antitumour activity of NXP800 was evaluated in mice bearing human tumor xenografts (in all studies tumor growth inhibition (TGI) was calculated versus vehicle control (i.e., no active drug) that was administered to a concurrently treated group of mice, p-values were calculated for the weight-based assessments):

NXP800 has been screened against several panels for secondary pharmacology, and no hits were found in any of the screens at concentrations that are relevant to the free drug target concentrations of NXP800 associated with efficacy (in mouse models) or toxicity (in rat and dog, the species used in the GLP-toxicology studies).

NXP800 was profiled against the Cerep Safetyscreen 87 at a concentration of 10 μM. Hits (> 50% at 10 μM) in this preliminary screen were then assessed across a range of concentrations in an individual cell- based assay for both agonism and antagonism of the relevant receptors. NXP800 showed no agonism activity with any receptor and antagonist activity with only one receptor with an IC50 of 2.0 μM. A GLP study was performed to evaluate the effects of NXP800 on cardiovascular parameters and body temperature in the dog (two groups of two dogs each) following oral administration, and the No Adverse Effect Level (NOEL), driven by a transient increase in arterial blood pressure, was 3 mg/kg.

The absorption, distribution, and metabolism properties of NXP800 were characterized, including apparent permeability in Caco-2 cells and transporter interaction, plasma protein binding and blood-to-plasma partitioning, intrinsic clearance, identification of metabolites (including a proposed metabolic pathway in human) and inhibition of human CYP isoforms. The excretion of NXP800 was characterized post IV or oral dose in rats.

The toxicity of NXP800 was initially assessed in healthy mice. Formal toxicology was then performed in rat and dog. In both rat and dog, non-GLP combined dose range finding and pharmacokinetic (“PK’’) studies were performed prior to the pivotal GLP 28-day repeat dose toxicity studies and included an assessment of recovery and toxicokinetics. All pivotal GLP toxicity studies were conducted at Charles River Laboratories Edinburgh Ltd, UK. The GLP studies were therefore performed in a country that is a member of the OECD Mutual Acceptance of Data program with the OECD Test Guidelines and Principles of GLP.

Rat and dog were selected as the rodent and non-rodent species for toxicity studies of NXP800 based on similarities to humans with regard to the proportion of hydrolysis metabolism. Based on initial PK studies, free drug exposure levels could be achieved following oral dosing at comparable levels to those required to achieve efficacy in mice. In addition, all metabolites found after exposure of human matrices to NXP800 were also found in matrices of one or both toxicity model species, and therefore their toxicity would be assessed in the toxicology studies.

Continuous daily dosing was selected as the initial schedule for NXP800 toxicity studies to facilitate flexibility in clinical administration. In the dog, Cmax-driven emesis limited exposure and the schedule changed to continuous twice daily dosing to increase exposure to NXP800.

Based on the clinical indication (advanced solid tumors) and route of administration (oral) of NXP800, no carcinogenicity, reproductive toxicity or local tolerance studies have been performed at this stage of development. Non GLP mutagenicity studies have been performed. The phototoxicity of NXP800 has also been assessed.

Based on the compelling preclinical data, in December 2021 we announced the commencement of the Phase 1 study for NXP800. The Phase 1 study is comprised of two parts: dose-escalation Phase 1a, initiated in December 2021, followed by an expansion Phase 1b. In the Phase 1a, the safety and tolerability of NXP800 are being evaluated in patients with advanced solid tumors to identify a dose and dosing schedule for the Phase 1b. The Phase 1a is being conducted in the U.S. and U.K. In the Phase 1b, the safety and preliminary anti-tumor activity of NXP800 will be evaluated in biomarker-selected patients, initially in ovarian clear cell carcinoma and endometrioid carcinoma harboring the ARID1a mutation and possibly cohorts of patients with additional types of solid tumors. The endpoints in the Phase 1 study that will be utilized to inform the primary objective include estimation of the rate and severity of adverse events and dose-limiting toxicities in the Phase 1a dose escalation stage, and estimation of clinical activity in the Phase 1b expansion stage of the Phase 1 study. Secondary objectives include characterization of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of NXP800. Once a recommended dose is established, patients will be enrolled in additional cohorts to determine the clinical activity and further characterize the clinical profile of NXP800. The sample size for the dose escalation portion of the study will be driven by the emerging clinical data and is expected to be between 20-50 subjects. In the expansion stage of the Phase 1 study, we plan to enroll three cohorts of 12 – 15 subjects each. We plan to include OCCC or endometrioid ovarian carcinoma patients with the ARID1a mutation in these cohorts.

In August 2021 we licensed worldwide commercial rights to NXP900 from the UoE. NXP900 is a preclinical- stage, targeted-therapy, small molecule drug candidate designed to preferentially inhibit the SRC and YES 1 kinases. We started the preclinical IND-enabling (or equivalent) studies for NXP900 in the fourth quarter of 2021. Following the IND-enabling studies, if successfully completed, we plan to submit an IND with the FDA, or an equivalent submission with a foreign agency, in order to begin a Phase 1 dose- escalation study of NXP900 in solid tumors in the second half of 2022. Subsequently, upon successful completion of the dose- escalation study, we plan to conduct a clinical trial to investigate NXP900 in solid tumors where the SRC and/or YES1 pathways are overactivated and implicated.

SRC is aberrantly activated in many cancer types, including solid tumor cancers such as breast, colon, prostate, pancreatic and ovarian cancers, while remaining predominantly inactive in non-cancerous cells. Increased SRC activity is generally associated with late-stage cancers, metastatic potential and resistance to therapies, and correlates with poor clinical prognosis. Signaling pathways activated by SRC include proliferation, cell growth, cell migration and metastasis, and angiogenesis mediated by Phosphatidylinositide 3 Kinase (PI3K), Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (Stat3), Interleukin (IL) 8, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) (see Figure 13).

Legend: Signaling pathways activated by SRC include proliferation, cell growth, cytoskeleton (cell migration and metastasis), and angiogenesis mediated by Phosphatidylinositide 3 Kinase (PI3K), Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (Stat3), Interleukin (IL) 8, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)

SRC is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase and a widely studied member of the SRC family kinases (SFKs), which include LYN, FYN, LCK, HCK, FGR, BLK, FRK and YES. The SRC kinase, product of the first cellular proto-oncogene identified, emerged as a potential therapeutic target in the early 1980s. Predominantly inactive in non-cancerous cells, SRC is aberrantly activated in many cancer types, including breast, colon, prostate, pancreatic and ovarian cancers. Increased SRC activity is generally associated with late-stage cancers, metastatic potential and resistance to treatment, and correlates with poor clinical prognosis. Despite the vast amount of evidence gathered over the years and the approval of dasatinib and bosutinib, which act as dual SRC/ABL kinase inhibitors to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia and acute lymphoblastic leukemia, both hematologic (liquid) tumors, to date no SFK inhibitor has been approved for the treatment of SRC-active solid tumor malignancies.

Due to high structural similarities between their active sites, most inhibitors targeting SFK’s, including the approved drugs dasatinib and bosutinib, display equal potency against the nonreceptor tyrosine kinase ABL. While dual inhibition of ABL and SRC can be beneficial in the treatment of hematologic cancers, this polypharmacological profile is not desirable in the treatment of solid tumors, as several studies have found that inhibition of ABL leads to immuno suppressive effects. To date no kinase inhibitor has been approved for the treatment of SRC-active solid tumor malignancies.

SRC pathway activation is regulated by a switch between an inactive and active conformation. The inactive conformation of SRC family kinases is associated with lack of membrane binding, lack of phosphorylation of the activation loop, and characterized by a “closed conformation.” The active “open” conformation allows for the binding of SRC to signaling partners such as PI3K and FAK, thus enabling full activation of the pathway via SRC’s kinase catalytic activity and the scaffolding property.

NXP900 is a targeted-therapy designed to preferentially inhibit the SRC and YES1 kinases. Unlike the approved and clinical-stage SRC kinase inhibitors, NXP900 induces and locks SRC in its native inactive conformation (see Figure 14), by inhibiting both the catalytic (enzymatic) and scaffolding functions, thus preventing phosphorylation and complex formation with its primary partners. NXP900 is highly selective compared to dasatinib, (see figure 15), an approved multitargeted kinase inhibitor, a property typically associated with an improved therapeutic window. Moreover, the existing SRC inhibitor drugs only inhibit the catalytic functions of SRC, still enabling it to bind to its primary partners and remain partially active.

This unique mechanism of action, which leads to inactivation of the SRC kinase, has resulted in SRC- pathway inhibition in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, treatment with NXP900 inhibited primary and metastatic tumor growth in xenograft models of breast cancer and demonstrated on-target pharmacodynamic effects. Therefore, this novel mode of inhibiting SRC by NXP900 could lead to improved treatment of SRC-associated oncologic disorders and provides the potential to treat solid tumors for the first time with a SRC inhibitor.

Gene amplification of the site containing the YES1 gene has been reported in clinical samples in several tumors including lung, head and neck, bladder and esophageal cancers. Furthermore, it has been found that YES1 gene amplification is a key mechanism of resistance to EGFR, Alk and HER2 inhibitors. YES1- dependent oncogenic transformation has also been reported, suggesting that YES1 plays a key role in these solid tumors — The transforming ability of YES1 has been demonstrated via several experimental methods, for example down-regulating YES1 by short hairpin RNA (shRNA) significantly inhibited cell growth in several malignancies, including colon carcinoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and basal-like breast cancer suggesting YES1 may play a key role in these solid tumors.

NXP900 has been shown to inhibit the YES1 kinase in preclinical models, providing an additional target for pharmacological inhibition by NXP900 of a biologically-relevant target in various cancer types, some of which may rely on both the SRC and YES1 pathways for their advantage. There are no YES1 inhibitors that are FDA approved or currently in clinical development. We plan to conduct in vivo studies to better understand the effects of YES1 inhibition in solid tumors driven by YES1 overexpression or gene amplification. We expect to continue to provide preclinical data updates at key medical conferences in 2022.

Legend: Complete activation of the SRC pathway requires both catalytic activity and scaffolding of its signal transduction partners in its active conformation (middle image).NXP900 locks SRC in its inactive conformation (left image) by inhibiting both the catalytic activity of SRC and its ability to bind to its signal transduction partners. Other SRC inhibitors, including dasatinib, only inhibit the catalytic activity of SRC while locking it in its active conformation (right image) thereby only partially inhibiting the SRC pathway.

Figure 15: Kinome profiling reveals high selectivity compared with dasatinib

Legend: Kinome-wide activity profile of NXP900 - enzymatic inhibition screen was performed by Carna Biosciences, against 326 wildtype and mutant kinases. Circles identify kinase targets of NXP900 (0.5μM, lilac) and dasatinib (1μM, deep purple), size represents percent inhibition. Dasatinib data from Remsing Rix et al., Leukemia 23, 477–485 (2009).

NXP900 is active against the catalytic activity of SRC in vitro at low nanomolar concentrations. NXP900 requires concentrations approximately three orders of magnitude (X1000) greater to inhibit ABL. In cells, NXP900 reduces SRC binding to its partner FAK. Notably, the SRC/ABL inhibitor dasatinib (known to bind SRC in its active conformation) induces precisely the opposite effect. These results provide convincing evidence that NXP900 and dasatinib bind and promote different conformations in SRC whereby NXP900 inhibits both SRC kinase catalytic activity and its scaffolding functions. Further, it has been recently reported that SRC inhibitors such as dasatinib are allosteric facilitators of SRC conformational activation, and actually enhance SRC-FAK complex formation and increase FAK autophosphorylation, leading to activation of signaling via SRC, whereas treatment with NXP900 is not expected to lead to such paradoxical activation.

The kinase inhibitors approved or in clinical development that target SRC activity are examples of non- selective, promiscuous inhibitors targeting many kinases in addition to SRC and its most closely related family members, often resulting in undesirable off-target effects. Preclinically, NXP900 inhibits YES1 and SRC in concentrations of 0.5 and 2.4 nM respectively. In addition, co-crystal structure analysis reveals that NXP900 induces and stabilizes the native inactive conformation of the SRC kinase domain as shown in Figure 14. The benefits of targeting the inactive SRC kinase conformation make this a unique property. which could prove advantageous clinically compared to other SRC inhibitors.

NXP900 demonstrated antitumor activity in mouse models of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC).

NXP900 mediated in vivo antitumor activity in murine triple negative breast cancer models, against primary tumors and bone metastases. (Figure 16). In the post-treatment period, mice with an intact immune system were able to control tumor growth beyond the treatment phase, whereas tumor relapse occurs in immunosuppressed mice as soon as the animals were off treatment. NXP900 was superior compared to dasatinib in an orthotopic model of TNBC. Moreover, this superiority in tumor growth inhibition and duration of response translated into improved overall survival of the test mice (Figure 17).

Based on the preclinical data and novel mechanism of action, we believe that NXP900 represents an important drug candidate for the treatment of SRC and YES1 associated oncologic disorders.

Figure 16: In vivo antitumor activity of NXP900 in murine triple negative breast cancer models, against primary tumors and bone metastases

Legend: (d,e) tumor growth inhibition of a MetBo2 breast cancer model in (d) immunocompetent FVB mice and (e) immunocompromised CD-1 mice treated orally daily for 28 d with NXP900 (40 mg/Kg) or vehicle.

(f) Tumor volumes at days 28 and 39 in FVB vs. CD1 mice treated with NXP900. (g-i) Metastasis inhibition by NXP900 in a breast cancer bone metastasis model (40 mg/Kg or vehicle). (g) Percentage bioluminescence imaging (BLI) in left and right hind legs. Animals were monitored for 63 d. (h) Comparative analysis of % BLI between groups at day 7. (i) Bioluminescence tomography images of two representative mice from each group at day 7.

Figure 17: NXP900 inhibited tumor growth in an orthotopic model of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) in immunocompetent animals demonstrating a substantial long-term effect after treatment completion and improved survival compared to dasatinib.

Legend: A,B) Comparative analysis of tumor volumes vs dasatinib; C) Kaplan-Meier Survival analysis.

Medulloblastoma is a rare brain cancer (with an annual incidence of approximately 500 in the U.S.) that affects mostly pediatric patients. While rare, it is the most common pediatric brain tumor, and by the time of diagnosis, as many as 40% of patients carry metastases and have a poor prognosis for survival. Metastatic disease and tumor recurrence are responsible for the lack of improvement in survival rates over the past decades. In addition, survivors frequently face treatment-related adverse effects.

Out of the four identified subtypes, group 4 is the most prevalent biological subtype, comprising approximately 40% of all medulloblastoma patients. Recent studies have identified aberrant ERBB4-SRC signaling pathway as the hallmark of group 4 patients, indicating the SRC kinase as a potential therapeutic target in this most common medulloblastoma subgroup.

In a PK study, NXP900 was shown to cross the blood-brain barrier in mice, in concentrations that exceeded the levels required to inhibit SRC in vitro with NXP900. The efficacy of NXP900 in a preclinical xenograft model of Group 4 Medulloblastoma was presented on June¹2th, 2022 at SIOPE Brain Tumour Group (Figure 18). This data supports the further exploration of NXP900 in the treatment of group 4 medulloblastoma. We plan to conduct additional preclinical testing of NXP900 to better understand the potential therapeutic effect of NXP900 in this indication.

Figure 18: NXP900 is highly effective in a preclinical model of group 4 Medulloblastoma

Legend: SrcCA/DNp53 tumour cells were cultured in vitro and transduced using lentivirus expressing Luciferase-eGFP, for tumor tracking. Mice received NXP900 (eCF506) 20mg/kg daily for 28 days via IP in a citric buffer. Tumor response was monitored weekly via bioluminescence and measured by calliper.

We have a mission-driven strategy to build a global biopharmaceutical company through the identification, licensing, development, and commercialization of therapeutics to address unmet medical needs in oncology, with an initial focus on OCCC and endometrioid ovarian carcinoma patients. We intend to leverage our core competencies of target selection, drug profiling and clinical and regulatory execution to build a pipeline of product candidates targeting cancers driven by genetic alterations. The key elements driving our business strategy include:

We strive to protect the proprietary technologies that we believe are important to our business, including pursuing, obtaining and maintaining patent protection intended to cover the composition of matter of our current or future product candidates, including NXP800, their methods of use, related technologies and other inventions that are important to our business. In addition to patent protection, we also rely on trade secrets to protect aspects of our business that are not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection. We also rely on know-how and continuing technological innovation to develop and maintain our proprietary and intellectual property position.

As with other biotechnology companies, our commercial success depends in part upon our ability to: obtain, maintain, enforce, and protect our patent, intellectual property, and other proprietary rights for our current or future product candidates and other commercially important technologies, inventions, improvements, and know-how related to our business; defend and enforce our intellectual property, in particular, any patent rights that we may own or in-license;, prevent others from infringing any patents we may own or in-license; preserve the confidentiality of our trade secrets; and operate without infringing the valid and enforceable intellectual property and proprietary rights of third parties.

Our ability to maintain and solidify our proprietary and intellectual property position for our current or future product candidates and technologies depends on our success in obtaining effective patent claims and enforcing those claims if granted. However, our current patent applications and any patent applications that we may in the future file or license from third parties may not result in the issuance of patents, and any issued patents we may obtain may not guarantee us the right to practice our technology in relation to the commercialization of our products. We also cannot predict the breadth of claims that may be allowed or enforced in any patents we may own or in- license in the future.

The patent positions for biotechnology and pharmaceutical companies like us are generally uncertain and can involve complex legal, scientific, and factual issues. We cannot predict whether the patent applications we are currently pursuing will issue as patents in any particular jurisdiction or whether the claims of any issued patents will provide sufficient proprietary protection from competitors. Any issued patents that we may own or in-license in the future may be challenged, invalidated, circumvented, or have the scope of their claims narrowed. Furthermore, the coverage claimed in a patent application can be significantly reduced before a patent is issued, and its scope can be reinterpreted and even challenged after issuance.

Moreover, many jurisdictions permit third parties to challenge issued patents in administrative proceedings, which may result in further narrowing or even cancellation of patent claims. As a result, we cannot guarantee that any of our current or future product candidates will be protected or remain protectable by enforceable patents. Moreover, any patents that we hold may be challenged, circumvented or invalidated by third parties. We cannot be certain of the priority of inventions covered by pending third-party patent applications. If third parties prepare and file patent applications in the United States that also claim technology or therapeutics to which we have rights, we may have to participate in interference proceedings in the USPTO to determine priority of invention, which could result in substantial costs to us, even if the eventual outcome is favorable to us, which is highly unpredictable. In addition, because of the extensive time required for clinical development and regulatory review of any current or future product candidate we may develop, it is possible that, before any current or future product candidates can be commercialized, any related patent may expire or remain in force for only a short period following commercialization, thereby limiting the protection such patent would afford the respective product and any competitive advantage such patent may provide.

We have licensed one patent family covering the composition of matter for NXP800, which includes two issued U.S. patents covering the composition of matter for NXP800, as well as methods of using and making NXP800. Composition of matter patents in this family have also been issued in other major markets, including Australia, Brazil, China, India, Israel, Mexico, Russia, Singapore, the E.U. and Japan. The statutory expiration for patents in this family is October 2034, without taking into account any possible patent term extension, where applicable. We have also licensed a patent family directed to additional compounds, structurally distinct from NXP800, that modulate HSF1. This patent family is granted in the U.S. and has a statutory expiration of April 2036. In addition, we have also licensed a patent family pending in the U.S. and Europe directed to deuterated compounds that modulate HSF1. Any patent that grants from this family would have a statutory expiration of October 2037. We intend to pursue additional patent protection for NXP800 relating to methods of use and related technologies that we consider important to our business.

We have licensed one patent family covering the composition of matter for NXP900, which includes one U.S. patent covering the composition of matter for NXP900, as well as patents and patent applications issued/pending in major markets, including the E.U. and Japan. The statutory expiration for patents in this patent family is April 2036, without taking into account any possible patent term extension, where applicable. We have also licensed a patent family directed to additional compounds targeting the SRC family, filed as a priority application August 2021. Any patent that grants from this family would have a statutory expiration of August 2042.

The term of individual patents depends upon the legal term of the patents in the countries in which they are obtained. In most countries in which we file, the patent term is 20 years from the earliest date of filing a non- provisional patent application. In the United States, the term of a patent covering an FDA-approved drug may, in certain cases, be eligible for a patent term extension under the Hatch-Waxman Act as compensation for the loss of patent term during the FDA regulatory review process. The period of extension may be up to five years, but cannot extend the remaining term of a patent beyond a total of 14 years from the date of product approval. Only one patent applicable to an approved drug is eligible for extension and only those claims covering the approved drug, a method for using it, or a method for manufacturing it may be extended. Similar provisions are available in Europe and in certain other jurisdictions to extend the term of a patent that covers an approved drug. It is possible that issued U.S. patents covering NXP800 and NXP900, may or will be entitled to patent term extensions. If our current or future product candidates receive FDA approval, we intend to apply for patent term extensions, if available, to extend the term of patents that cover any approved product candidates. We also intend to seek patent term extensions in any jurisdictions where they are available; however, there is no guarantee that the applicable authorities, including the FDA, will agree with our assessment of whether such extensions should be granted, and even if granted, the length of such extensions.

In addition to patent protection, we also rely on trade secret protection for our proprietary information that is not amenable to, or that we do not consider appropriate for, patent protection, including certain aspect of our manufacturing processes. However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect. Although we take steps to protect our proprietary information, including restricting access to our confidential information, as well as entering into non-disclosure and confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, independent contractors, advisors, contract manufacturers, CROs, hospitals, independent treatment centers, suppliers, collaborators and other third parties, such parties may breach such agreements and disclose our proprietary information including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. In addition, third parties may independently develop the same or similar proprietary information or may otherwise gain access to our proprietary information. As a result, we may be unable to meaningfully protect our trade secrets and proprietary information. For more information regarding the risks related to our intellectual property, please see “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property.”

In May 2021, we entered into a worldwide, exclusive license agreement with the CRT Pioneer Fund (“CRT”) for NXP800 and any of its derivatives (collectively, the “NXP800 Program”). NXP800 is a small molecule product candidate that we believe can be applied to a broad range of cancers.

Prior to Nuvectis, CRT was the commercial owner of the NXP800 Program which it acquired from the ICR. The ICR is a world-renowned research institute focused on the discovery and preclinical development of cancer therapeutics.

Pursuant to the license agreement, we have an obligation to pay success-based milestones and royalties to CRT, as follows:

In addition, in connection with the licensing agreement, we intend to provide ICR with approximately $650,000 research and development support over the next 18 months to conduct additional scientific research and preclinical testing for certain indications that we select in connection with the NXP800 Program. We own an exclusive license to intellectual property rights developed in the collaboration, to research, develop and commercialize products resulting from the collaboration.

The license will remain in effect in each territory subject to the license and will continue until our obligation to pay royalties in such territory has expired. The royalty term for each licensed product in each country commences with the first commercial sale of the applicable licensed product in the applicable country and ending on the expiration of the last to expire of any patent specified by the license (with the key composition of matters patent expiring October 2034) or the expiration of any extended exclusivity period in the relevant country. CRT may earlier terminate the license if we, or any of our affiliates or sub-licensees, challenge or seek to challenge the validity of any of the licensed patents or upon a change of control in which we become controlled by a Tobacco Party, as such term is defined in the license. Either party may terminate the license upon material breach by the other party, and upon the appointment of a receiver or upon a winding-up order or similar or equivalent action.

In August 2021, we entered into a worldwide, exclusive license agreement with the UoE for NXP900 and any of its derivatives (collectively, the “NXP900 Program”). Discovered at the UoE, NXP900 is a targeted therapy, small molecule SRC and YES1 kinase inhibitor product candidate that we believe can be applied to a broad range of cancers.

Pursuant to the license agreement, we have an obligation to pay success-based milestones and royalties to the UoE, as follows:

In addition, in connection with the licensing agreement, we intend to provide the UoE with up to an additional £580,000 in research and development support over the next approximately 12 months to conduct additional scientific research and preclinical testing for certain indications that we select in connection with the NXP900 Program. We own an exclusive license to intellectual property rights developed in the collaboration, to research, develop and commercialize products resulting from the collaboration.

The royalty term for each licensed product in each country is the period commencing with first commercial sale of the applicable licensed product in the applicable country and ending on the expiration of the last to expire of any patent specified by the license (statutory expiration for the NXP900 patent family is April 2036), or the expiration of any extended exclusivity period in the relevant country. We may terminate the license if we determine that it is not scientifically or commercially viable to research, develop, or commercialize the licensed products which are the subject of the license agreement. UoE may terminate the agreement if we: (i) cease to carry on the business regarding the treatment, prevention and/or diagnosis of human diseases; (ii) discontinue the development of the licensed products which are the subject of the license; (iii) dispose of our assets or business in whole or in material part; (iv) challenge the validity, ownership, or enforceability of the exclusively licensed technology; (v) contest the secret or substantial nature of certain know-how subject to the license; or (vi) breach certain diligence obligations or fail to pay any amount due under the license within a specified time frame. The parties may terminate the NXP900 License Agreement immediately by written notice upon material breach by the other party, if such breach (if capable of cure) is not so cured to the within thirty (30) business days following the notice of breach.

Our industry is intensely competitive and subject to rapid and significant technological changes. We face competition with respect to our current product candidates, and will face competition with respect to future product candidates, from segments of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and other related markets. For example, there are several companies that are developing drugs for various types of ovarian cancer, including Immunogen Therapeutics and Constellation Pharma. Of note, in May 2021 Constellation Pharma (acquired by Morphosys, June 2021), has disclosed patient recruitment commencing in May 2021 in a phase 2 expansion cohort for CPI-0209, a small molecule inhibitor of Enhancer of Zeste Homolog 2 (“EZH2”) in patients with relapsed urothelial carcinoma, relapsed OCCC, and relapsed endometrial carcinoma all with known ARID1A mutations. As of the last update posted on clinicaltrials.gov on May 18^th, 2022, this study is open for enrollment.

In the SRC/YES1 space Dasatinib (SPRYCEL^®) and bosutinib (BOSULIF^®) are multikinase inhibitors that also target Abl and SRC and are approved in Philadelphia chromosome-positive chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), both hematological malignancies. These two compounds have been extensively tested in solid tumors demonstrating only minor clinical activity. Sarcatinib is an inhibitor of the SRC/ABl family of kinases. It was originally developed by AstraZeneca for various types of cancer, but discontinued in Phase 2 for lack of sufficient efficacy.

Turning Point Therapeutics (Turning Point) is developing TPX-0022, a MET/SRC/CSF1R inhibitor which is currently being studied in a Phase 1 trial of patients with advanced or metastatic solid tumors harboring MET genetic alterations. The simultaneous inhibition of MET, SRC and CSF1R kinases has been reported by Turning Point as a key component of the target product profile, and Turning Point has described the program as a strategy for the treatment of MET-driven solid tumors, an area that does not overlap with our development strategy. Turning Point is also developing TPX-0046, a RET kinase inhibitor that can also inhibit other kinases including SRC family members, YES1, ABl, TRK and JAK2. TPX-0046 is being evaluated in an ongoing Phase 1/2 clinical trial for the treatment of advanced solid tumors with RET gene alterations, an area that does not overlap with our development strategy. As of the last update posted on clinicaltrials.gov on April 8^th, 2022, this study is open for enrollment.

Our competitors may obtain regulatory approval of their products more rapidly than us, or may obtain patent protection or other intellectual property rights that limit our ability to develop or commercialize our current or future product candidates. Our competitors may also develop drugs that are more effective, more convenient, more widely used and less costly, or have a better safety profile than our products; and these competitors may also be more successful than us in manufacturing and marketing their products.

In addition, we may need to develop our current or future product candidates in collaboration with diagnostic companies, and we will face competition from other companies in establishing these collaborations. Our competitors will also compete with us in recruiting and retaining qualified scientific, management and commercial personnel, establishing clinical trial sites and patient registration for clinical trials, as well as in acquiring technologies complementary to, or necessary for, our programs.

Furthermore, we also face competition more broadly across the market for cost-effective and reimbursable cancer treatments. The most common methods of treating patients with cancer are surgery, radiation and drug therapy, including chemotherapy, hormone therapy and targeted drug therapy, or a combination of such methods. There are a variety of available drug therapies marketed for cancer. In many cases, these drugs are administered in combination to enhance efficacy. While our current or future product candidates, if any, are approved, may compete with these existing drug and other therapies, to the extent they are ultimately used in combination with, or as an adjunct to, these therapies, our current or future product candidates may not be competitive with them. Some of these drugs are branded and subject to patent protection, and others are available on a generic basis. Insurers and other third-party payors may also encourage the use of generic products or specific branded products. We expect that if any of our current or future product candidates are approved, they will be priced at a significant premium over competitive generic and branded generic products. As a result, obtaining market acceptance of, and gaining significant share of the market for, any of our current or future product candidates that we successfully introduce to the market will pose challenges. In addition, many companies are developing new therapeutics, and we cannot predict what the standard of care will be as our current or future product candidates progress through clinical development.

The acquisition or licensing of pharmaceutical products is also very competitive. If we seek to acquire or license products, we will face substantial competition from a number of more established companies, some of which have acknowledged strategies to license or acquire products and many of which are bigger than us and have more institutional experience and greater cash flows than we have. These more established companies may have competitive advantages over us, as may other emerging companies taking similar or different approaches to product licenses and/or acquisitions. In addition, a number of established research- based pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies may acquire products in late stages of development to augment their internal product lines, which may provide those companies with an even greater competitive advantage.

We do not have any manufacturing facilities or personnel. We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on a third-party manufacturers including a single-manufacturer to make the NXP800 drug substance and a single-manufacturer to make the NXP800 drug product. With respect to NXP900, to date, the drug substance has been manufactured by a non-GMP manufacturer for research purposes at lab scale.

We plan to continue to rely on third party manufacturers for the supply of NXP800 and NXP900, for manufacture of future additional product candidates, for preclinical testing as well as for clinical trials and commercial manufacture if our current or future product candidates receive marketing approval.

Subject to receiving marketing approvals, we expect to commence commercialization activities by building a focused sales and marketing organization in the United States to sell our products. We believe that such an organization will be able to address the community of oncologists who are the key specialists in treating the patient populations for which our current or future product candidates are being developed. Outside the United States, we expect to enter into distribution and other marketing arrangements with third parties for any of our current or future product candidates that obtain marketing approval.

We also plan to build a marketing and sales management organization to create and implement marketing strategies for any products that we market through our own sales organization and to oversee and support our sales force. The responsibilities of the marketing organization would include developing educational initiatives with respect to approved products and establishing relationships with researchers and practitioners in relevant fields of medicine.

The FDA and other regulatory authorities at federal, state and local levels, as well as in foreign countries, extensively regulate, among other things, the research, development, testing, manufacture, quality control, import, export, safety, effectiveness, labeling, packaging, storage, distribution, record keeping, approval, advertising, promotion, marketing, post-approval monitoring and post-approval reporting of drugs. We, along with our vendors, contract research organizations and contract manufacturers, will be required to navigate the various preclinical, clinical, manufacturing and commercial requirements of the FDA, as well as of any other governing regulatory agency of the countries in which we wish to conduct studies or seek approval of our current or future product candidates. The process of obtaining regulatory approvals of drugs and ensuring subsequent compliance with appropriate federal, state, local and foreign statutes and regulations requires the expenditure of substantial time and financial resources.

In the United States, the FDA regulates drug products under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and its subsequent enactments, its implementing regulations, and other laws. Our product candidates have not been approved by the FDA for marketing in the United States. If we fail to comply with applicable FDA or other requirements at any time with respect to product development, clinical testing, approval or any other legal requirements relating to product manufacture, processing, handling, storage, quality control, safety, marketing, advertising, promotion, packaging, labeling, export, import, distribution, or sale, we may become subject to administrative or judicial sanctions or other legal consequences. These sanctions or consequences could include, among other things, the FDA’s refusal to approve pending applications, the issuance of clinical holds for ongoing studies, suspension or revocation of approved applications, warning or untitled letters, product withdrawals or recalls, product seizures, relabeling or repackaging, total or partial suspensions of manufacturing or distribution, injunctions, fines, civil penalties or criminal prosecution.

The process required by the FDA before a product candidate is approved as a drug for therapeutic indications in the United States generally involves the following:

The testing and approval process requires substantial time, effort, and financial resources, and we cannot be certain that any approvals for our current or future product candidates will be granted on a timely basis, if at all.

Before testing any drug in humans, a product candidate must undergo rigorous preclinical testing. Preclinical studies include laboratory evaluations of drug chemistry, formulation and stability, as well as in vitro and animal studies to assess safety and address use concerns. The conduct of preclinical studies is subject to federal and state regulations and requirements, including GCP requirements for safety/toxicology studies. The results of the preclinical studies, together with manufacturing information and analytical data must be submitted to the FDA as part of an IND application. An IND application is a request for authorization from the FDA to administer an investigational product to humans and must become effective before clinical trials may begin. Some long-term preclinical testing may continue after the IND is submitted. An IND automatically becomes effective 30 days after receipt by the FDA unless the FDA raises concerns or questions about any portion of the IND application and imposes a clinical hold. In such a case, the IND sponsor and the FDA need to resolve any outstanding concerns before the clinical trial can begin. Submission of an IND application may result in the FDA not allowing clinical trials to commence or not allowing clinical trials to commence on the terms originally specified in the IND application. A separate submission to an existing IND must also be made for each successive clinical trial conducted during product development of a product candidate, and the FDA must grant permission, either explicitly or implicitly by not objecting, before each clinical trial can begin.

The clinical stage of development involves the administration of a product candidate to healthy volunteers or patients under the supervision of qualified investigators, generally physicians not employed by or under the trial sponsor’s control, in accordance with GCP requirements, which include the requirements that all research subjects provide their informed consent for their participation in any clinical trial. Clinical trials are conducted under protocols detailing, among other things, the objectives of the clinical trial, dosing procedures, subject selection and exclusion criteria and the parameters and criteria to be used in monitoring safety and evaluating efficacy. Each protocol, and any subsequent amendments to the protocol, must be submitted to the FDA as part of the IND application. Furthermore, an IRB representing each institution that is participating in the clinical trial must review and approve the plan for any clinical trial before it commences at that institution, and the IRB must thereafter conduct a continuing review and reapprove the trial at least annually. The IRB must review and approve, among other things, the trial protocol and informed consent information to be provided to clinical trial subjects. An IRB must operate in compliance with FDA regulations.

Information about certain clinical trials, including details of the protocol and eventually study results, also must be submitted within specific timeframes to the National Institutes of Health for public dissemination on the ClinicalTrials.gov data registry. Information related to the product, patient population, phase of investigation, study sites and investigators and other aspects of the clinical trial is made public as part of the registration of the clinical trial. Sponsors are also obligated to disclose the results of their clinical trials after completion. Disclosure of the results of these trials can be delayed in some cases for up to two years after the date of completion of the trial. Failure to timely register a covered clinical study or to submit study results as provided for in the law can give rise to civil monetary penalties and also prevent the non- compliant party from receiving future grant funds from the federal government. The NIH’s Final Rule on ClinicalTrials.gov registration and reporting requirements became effective in 2017, and both NIH and FDA have signaled the government’s willingness to begin enforcing those requirements against non-compliant clinical trial sponsors.

A sponsor who wishes to conduct a clinical trial outside of the United States may obtain FDA authorization to conduct the clinical trial under an IND. If a foreign clinical trial is not conducted under an IND, the sponsor must submit data from the clinical trial to the FDA in support of an NDA. The FDA may accept a well-designed and well-conducted foreign clinical study not conducted under an IND if the study was conducted in accordance with GCP requirements, and the FDA is able to validate the data through an onsite inspection if deemed necessary.

Clinical development of product candidates to support NDAs are typically conducted in three sequential phases, which may overlap:

Post-approval trials, sometimes referred to as Phase 4 clinical trials, may be conducted after initial marketing approval. These trials are used to gain additional experience from the treatment of patients in the intended therapeutic indication. In certain instances, the FDA may mandate the performance of Phase 4 clinical trials as a condition of approval of an NDA.

Progress reports detailing the results of the clinical trials must be submitted at least annually to the FDA and more frequently if serious adverse events, or SAEs, occur. The FDA or the sponsor may suspend or terminate a clinical trial at any time on various grounds, including a finding that the research subjects or patients are being exposed to an unacceptable health risk. Similarly, an IRB can suspend or terminate approval of a clinical trial at its institution if the clinical trial is not being conducted in accordance with the clinical protocol, GCP, or other IRB requirements or if the drug has been associated with unexpected serious harm to patients.

Concurrent with clinical trials, additional animal studies are often completed and additional information about the chemistry and physical characteristics of the product candidate, including finalization of the process for manufacturing the drug product in commercial quantities in accordance with cGMP requirements is generated. The manufacturing process must be capable of consistently producing quality batches of the product candidate and manufacturers must develop, among other things, methods for testing the identity, strength, quality and purity of the final drug product. Additionally, appropriate packaging must be selected and tested, and stability studies must be conducted to demonstrate that the product candidate does not undergo unacceptable deterioration over its shelf life.

Assuming successful completion of the required clinical testing, the results of the preclinical studies and clinical trials, together with detailed information relating to the product’s chemistry, manufacture, controls and proposed labeling, among other things, are submitted to the FDA as part of an NDA requesting approval to market the product for one or more indications. An NDA is a request for approval to market a new drug for one or more specified indications and must contain proof of the drug’s safety and efficacy. Data may come from company-sponsored clinical trials intended to test the safety and efficacy of a product’s use or from a number of alternative sources, including studies initiated by investigators. To support marketing approval, the data submitted must be sufficient in quality and quantity to establish the safety and efficacy of the investigational product to the satisfaction of the FDA. Under federal law, the fee for the submission of an NDA for which clinical data is substantial (for example, for FY2021 this application fee exceeds $2.8 million), and for which the sponsor of an approved NDA is also subject to an annual program fee, is currently more than $300,000 per program. These fees are typically adjusted annually, but exemptions and waivers may be available under certain circumstances.

The FDA performs a preliminary review of the NDA within 60 days of receipt and informs the sponsor by the 74th day after the FDA’s receipt of the submission whether an application is sufficiently complete to permit substantive review. The FDA may request additional information rather than accept an NDA for filing. In this event, the application must be resubmitted with the additional information. The resubmitted application is also subject to review before the FDA accepts it for filing.

If the NDA is filed, the FDA begins an in-depth substantive review of the NDA. The FDA reviews an NDA to determine, among other things, whether the drug is safe and effective and whether the facility in which it is manufactured, processed, packaged or held meets standards designed to assure the product’s continued safety, quality and purity. Under the goals and policies agreed to by the FDA under the Prescription Drug User Fee Act, or PDUFA, for original NDAs, the FDA has ten months from the filing date in which to complete its initial review of a standard application and respond to the applicant, and six months from the filing date for an application with priority review. For all new molecular entity, or NME, NDAs, the ten and six-month time periods run from the filing date; for all other original applications, the ten and six-month time periods run from the submission date. Despite these review goals, it is not uncommon for FDA review of an NDA to extend beyond the goal date. The review process may be extended by the FDA for three additional months to consider new information or in the case of a clarification provided by the applicant to address an outstanding deficiency identified by the FDA following the original submission.

Before approving an NDA, the FDA will typically inspect the facility or facilities where the product is manufactured. The FDA will not approve an application unless it determines that the manufacturing processes and facilities are in compliance with cGMP requirements and adequate to assure consistent production of the new drug product within required specifications. Additionally, before approving an NDA, the FDA may inspect one or more clinical trial sites to assure compliance with GCP and other requirements and the integrity of the clinical data submitted to the FDA.

The FDA also may require submission of a Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategies (“REMS”) plan to ensure that the benefits of the drug outweigh its risks and to assure the safe use of the drug product. The REMS plan could include medication guides, physician communication plans, assessment plans, and/or elements to assure safe use, such as restricted distribution methods, patient registries, or other risk- minimization tools. The FDA determines the requirement for a REMS, as well as the specific REMS provisions, on a case-by-case basis. If the FDA concludes a REMS is needed, the sponsor of the NDA must submit a proposed REMS. The FDA will not approve an NDA without a REMS, if required.

The FDA may refer any NDA to an advisory committee. An advisory committee is a panel of independent experts, including clinicians and other scientific experts, which reviews, evaluates and provides a recommendation as to whether the application should be approved, and under what conditions. The FDA is not bound by the recommendations of an advisory committee, but it considers such recommendations carefully when making decisions.

After evaluating the NDA and all related information, the FDA may issue an approval letter or a complete response letter (“CRL”). An approval letter authorizes commercial marketing of the drug with specific prescribing information for specific indications. A CRL generally contains details on specific conditions that must be met to support approval of the NDA, often requiring additional clinical or preclinical testing in order for the FDA to reconsider the application. Even with submission of this additional information, the FDA ultimately may decide that the application does not satisfy the regulatory criteria for approval. If and when the conditions identified in the CRL have been met to the FDA’s satisfaction, the FDA may issue an approval letter.

If a product receives regulatory approval from the FDA, the approval is limited to the conditions of use (e.g., patient population, indication) described in the application. Further, depending on the specific risk(s) to be addressed, the FDA may limit the approved indications for use of the product, require that contraindications, warnings or precautions be included in the product labeling, require that post-approval studies, including Phase 4 clinical trials, be conducted to further assess a drug’s safety after approval, require testing and surveillance programs to monitor the product after commercialization, or impose other conditions, including distribution and use restrictions or other risk management mechanisms under a REMS, which can materially affect the potential market and profitability of the product. The FDA may prevent or limit further marketing of a product based on the results of post-marketing studies or surveillance programs. After approval, some types of changes to the approved product, such as adding new indications, manufacturing changes, and additional labeling claims, are subject to further testing requirements and FDA review and approval.

Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA may grant orphan designation to a drug intended to treat a rare disease or condition, which is a disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 individuals in the United States, or if it affects more than 200,000 individuals in the United States, but there is no reasonable expectation that the cost of developing and making the product available in the United States for the disease or condition will be recovered from sales of the product. Orphan designation must be requested before submitting an NDA. Orphan designation does not convey any advantage in or shorten the duration of the regulatory review and approval process, though companies developing orphan products are eligible for certain incentives, including tax credits for qualified clinical testing and waiver of application fees.

If a product that has orphan designation subsequently receives the first FDA approval for the disease or condition for which it has such designation, the product is entitled to a seven-year period of marketing exclusivity during which the FDA may not approve any other applications to market the same therapeutic agent for the same indication, except in limited circumstances. However, competitors may receive approval of different therapeutic product candidates for the indication for which the orphan product has exclusivity or obtain approval for the same therapeutic agent for a different indication than that for which the orphan product has exclusivity. Orphan product exclusivity could block the approval of one of our products for seven years if a competitor obtains approval for the same therapeutic agent for the same indication before we do, unless we are able to demonstrate that our product is superior. If an orphan designated product receives marketing approval for an indication broader than what is designated, it may not be entitled to orphan exclusivity. Further, orphan drug exclusive marketing rights in the United States may be lost if the FDA later determines that the request for designation was materially defective or the manufacturer of the approved product is unable to assure sufficient quantities of the product to meet the needs of patients with the rare disease or condition.

The FDA is authorized to designate certain products for expedited development or review if they are intended to address an unmet medical need in the treatment of a serious or life-threatening disease or condition. These programs include fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation and priority review designation.

A new drug is eligible for fast track designation if it is intended to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and demonstrates the potential to address an unmet medical need for such disease or condition. Fast track designation provides increased opportunities for sponsor interactions with the FDA during preclinical and clinical development, in addition to the potential for rolling review of a marketing application once a marketing application is filed, meaning that the agency may review portions of the application before the sponsor submits the complete application, as well as priority review, discussed below. In addition, a new drug may be eligible for breakthrough therapy designation if it is intended, alone or in combination with one or more other drugs or biologics, to treat a serious or life-threatening disease or condition and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the drug may demonstrate substantial improvement over existing therapies on one or more clinically significant endpoints, such as substantial treatment effects observed early in clinical development. Breakthrough therapy designation provides all the features of fast track designation in addition to intensive guidance on an efficient drug development program beginning as early as Phase 1, and FDA organizational commitment to expedited development, including involvement of senior managers and experienced review staff in a cross-disciplinary review, where appropriate. Drugs or biologics designated as breakthrough therapies are also eligible for accelerated approval of their respective marketing applications.

Finally, the FDA may designate a product for priority review if it is a drug or biologic that treats a serious condition and, if approved, would provide a significant improvement in safety or effectiveness. The FDA determines at the time that the marketing application is submitted, on a case-by-case basis, whether the proposed drug represents a significant improvement in treatment, prevention or diagnosis of disease when compared with other available therapies. Significant improvement may be illustrated by evidence of increased effectiveness in the treatment of a condition, elimination or substantial reduction of a treatment-limiting drug reaction, documented enhancement of patient compliance that may lead to improvement in serious outcomes, or evidence of safety and effectiveness in a new subpopulation. A priority review designation is intended to direct overall attention and resources to the evaluation of such applications, and to shorten the FDA’s goal for taking action on a marketing application from ten months to six months for a new molecular entity NDA from the date of filing.

Even if a product qualifies for one or more of these programs, the FDA may later decide that the product no longer meets the conditions for qualification or decide that the time period for FDA review or approval will not be shortened. Furthermore, fast track designation, breakthrough therapy designation and priority review do not change the standards for approval and may not ultimately expedite the development or approval process.

Pediatric exclusivity is a type of non-patent marketing exclusivity available in the United States and, if granted, it provides for the attachment of an additional six months of marketing protection to the term of any existing regulatory exclusivity or listed patents. This six-month exclusivity may be granted if an NDA sponsor submits pediatric data that fairly respond to a written request from the FDA for such data. The data do not need to show the product to be effective in the pediatric population studied; rather, if the clinical trial is deemed to fairly respond to the FDA’s request, the additional protection is granted. If reports of requested pediatric studies are submitted to and accepted by the FDA within the statutory time limits, whatever statutory or regulatory periods of exclusivity or patent protection cover the product are extended by six months. This is not a patent term extension, but it effectively extends the regulatory period during which the FDA cannot approve another application. The issuance of a written request does not require the sponsor to undertake the described studies.

Drugs manufactured or distributed pursuant to FDA approvals are subject to pervasive and continuing regulation by the FDA, including, among other things, requirements relating to recordkeeping, periodic reporting, product sampling and distribution, reporting of adverse experiences with the product, complying with promotion and advertising requirements, which include restrictions on promoting products for unapproved uses or patient populations (known as “off-label use”) and limitations on industry-sponsored scientific and educational activities. Although physicians may prescribe legally available products for off- label uses, manufacturers may not market or promote such uses. The FDA and other agencies actively enforce the laws and regulations prohibiting the promotion of off-label uses, and a company that is found to have improperly promoted off-label uses may be subject to significant liability, including investigation by federal and state authorities. Prescription drug promotional materials must be submitted to the FDA in conjunction with their first use or first publication. Further, if there are any modifications to the drug, including changes in indications, labeling or manufacturing processes or facilities, the applicant may be required to submit and obtain FDA approval of a new NDA or an NDA supplement, which may require the development of additional data or preclinical studies and clinical trials. The FDA may also impose a number of post- approval requirements as a condition of approval of an NDA.

In addition, drug manufacturers and their subcontractors involved in the manufacture and distribution of approved drugs are required to register their establishments with the FDA and certain state agencies and are subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA and certain state agencies for compliance with ongoing regulatory requirements, including cGMP, which impose certain procedural and documentation requirements upon us and our contract manufacturers. Failure to comply with statutory and regulatory requirements can subject a manufacturer to possible legal or regulatory action, such as warning letters, suspension of manufacturing, product seizures, injunctions, civil penalties or criminal prosecution.

Once an approval or clearance of a drug is granted, the FDA may withdraw the approval if compliance with regulatory requirements and standards is not maintained or if problems occur after the product reaches the market. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in revisions to the approved labeling to add new safety information, requirements for post-market studies or clinical trials to assess new safety risks, or imposition of distribution or other restrictions under a REMS. Other potential consequences include, among other things:

Manufacturing, sales, promotion and other activities of product candidates following product approval, where applicable, or commercialization are also subject to regulation by numerous regulatory authorities in the United States in addition to the FDA, which may include CMS, other divisions of the Department of Health and Human Services, the Department of Justice, the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the Federal Trade Commission, the Occupational Safety & Health Administration, the Environmental Protection Agency and state and local governments and governmental agencies.

Healthcare providers, physicians, and third-party payors will play a primary role in the recommendation and prescription of any products for which we obtain marketing approval. Our business operations and any current or future arrangements with third-party payors, healthcare providers and physicians may expose us to broadly applicable fraud and abuse and other healthcare laws and regulations that may constrain the business or financial arrangements and relationships through which we develop, market, sell and distribute any drugs for which we obtain marketing approval. In the United States, these laws include, without limitation, state and federal anti-kickback, false claims, physician transparency, and patient data privacy and security laws and regulations. For a description of these risks, please see the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

In the United States and markets in other countries, patients who are prescribed treatments for their conditions and providers performing the prescribed services generally rely on third-party payors to reimburse all or part of the associated healthcare costs. Thus, even if a product candidate is approved, sales of the product will depend, in part, on the extent to which third-party payors, including government health programs in the United States such as Medicare and Medicaid, commercial health insurers and managed care organizations, provide coverage, and establish adequate reimbursement levels for the product. In the United States, the principal decisions about reimbursement for new medicines are typically made by CMS. CMS decides whether and to what extent a new medicine will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare and private payors tend to follow CMS to a substantial degree. No uniform policy of coverage and reimbursement for drug products exists among third-party payors. Therefore, coverage and reimbursement for drug products can differ significantly from payor to payor. The process for determining whether a third-party payor will provide coverage for a product may be separate from the process for setting the price or reimbursement rate that the payor will pay for the product once coverage is approved. Third-party payors are increasingly challenging the prices charged, examining the medical necessity, and reviewing the cost-effectiveness of medical products and services and imposing controls to manage costs. Third-party payors may limit coverage to specific products on an approved list, also known as a formulary, which might not include all of the approved products for a particular indication.

In order to secure coverage and reimbursement for any product that might be approved for sale, a company may need to conduct expensive pharmacoeconomic studies in order to demonstrate the medical necessity and cost-effectiveness of the product, in addition to the costs required to obtain FDA or other comparable regulatory approvals. Additionally, companies may also need to provide discounts to purchasers, private health plans or government healthcare programs. Nonetheless, product candidates may not be considered medically necessary or cost effective. A decision by a third-party payor not to cover a product could reduce physician utilization once the product is approved and have a material adverse effect on sales, our operations and financial condition. Additionally, a third-party payor’s decision to provide coverage for a product does not imply that an adequate reimbursement rate will be approved. Further, one payor’s determination to provide coverage for a product does not assure that other payors will also provide coverage and reimbursement for the product, and the level of coverage and reimbursement can differ significantly from payor to payor.

The containment of healthcare costs has become a priority of federal, state and foreign governments, and the prices of products have been a focus in this effort. Governments have shown significant interest in implementing cost-containment programs, including price controls, restrictions on reimbursement and requirements for substitution of generic products. Adoption of price controls and cost-containment measures, and adoption of more restrictive policies in jurisdictions with existing controls and measures, could further limit a company’s revenue generated from the sale of any approved products. Coverage policies and third-party payor reimbursement rates may change at any time. Even if favorable coverage and reimbursement status is attained for one or more products for which a company or its collaborators receive regulatory approval, less favorable coverage policies and reimbursement rates may be implemented in the future.

The FDA’s and other regulatory authorities’ policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our current or future product candidates. For example, in December 2016, the 21st Century Cures Act, or Cures Act, was signed into law. The Cures Act, among other things, was intended to modernize the regulation of drugs and devices and to spur innovation, but its ultimate implementation is uncertain. Legislative proposals continue to be discussed in the U.S. Congress as potentially leading to a future “Cures 2.0” bill that is expected to have bipartisan support. In addition, in August 2017, the FDA Reauthorization Act was signed into law, which reauthorized the FDA’s user fee programs and included additional drug and biological product provisions. The next legislative reauthorization must be completed in 2022, which has the potential to make further changes to FDA authorities or policies pertaining to biopharmaceutical products. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we otherwise may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

In recent years, there has been heightened governmental scrutiny over the manner in which biopharmaceutical manufacturers set prices for their marketed products. Such scrutiny has resulted in several recent U.S. Congressional inquiries and proposed and enacted federal and state legislation designed to, among other things, bring more transparency to drug pricing, review the relationship between pricing and manufacturer patient programs, reduce the cost of drugs under Medicare, and reform government program reimbursement methodologies for pharmaceutical products. Congress and the executive branch have each indicated that it will continue to seek new legislative and/or administrative measures to control drug costs, making this area subject to ongoing uncertainty.

At the state level in the United States, legislatures have also increasingly passed legislation and implemented regulations designed to control pharmaceutical product pricing, including price or patient reimbursement constraints, discounts, restrictions on certain product access, and marketing cost disclosure and transparency measures, and in some cases, designed to encourage importation from other countries and bulk purchasing. In December 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court held unanimously that federal law does not preempt the states’ ability to regulate pharmaceutical benefit managers, or PBMs, and other members of the healthcare and pharmaceutical supply chain, an important decision that may lead to further and more aggressive efforts by states in this area.

We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative or executive action, either in the United States or abroad. We expect that additional federal, state, and foreign healthcare reform measures will be adopted in the future, any of which could limit the amounts that federal and state governments will pay for healthcare products and services, which could result in limited coverage and reimbursement and reduced demand for our products, once approved, or additional pricing pressures.

We may be subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. From time to time and in the future, our operations may involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological materials, and may also produce hazardous waste products. Even if we contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and waste products, we cannot completely eliminate the risk of contamination or injury resulting from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from the use or disposal of our hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties for failure to comply with such laws and regulations.

We maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees, but this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. However, we do not maintain insurance for environmental liability or toxic tort claims that may be asserted against us. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. Current or future environmental laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. In addition, failure to comply with these laws and regulations may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.

To market any product outside of the United States, we would need to comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements of other countries regarding safety and efficacy and governing, among other things, clinical trials, marketing authorization or identification of an alternate regulatory pathway, manufacturing, commercial sales and distribution of our products. For instance, in the European Economic Area (“EEA”) (comprised of the 28 EU Member States plus Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway), medicinal products must be authorized for marketing by using either the centralized authorization procedure or national authorization procedures.

In the EEA, new products for therapeutic indications that are authorized for marketing (i.e., reference products) qualify for eight years of data exclusivity and an additional two years of market exclusivity upon marketing authorization. The data exclusivity period prevents generic or biosimilar applicants from relying on the preclinical and clinical trial data contained in the dossier of the reference product when applying for a generic or biosimilar marketing authorization in the EU during a period of eight years from the date on which the reference product was first authorized in the EU. The market exclusivity period prevents a successful generic or biosimilar applicant from commercializing its product in the EU until ten years have elapsed from the initial authorization of the reference product in the EU. The ten-year market exclusivity period can be extended to a maximum of eleven years if, during the first eight years of those ten years, the marketing authorization holder obtains an authorization for one or more new therapeutic indications which, during the scientific evaluation prior to their authorization, are held to bring a significant clinical benefit in comparison with existing therapies.

The criteria for designating an “orphan medicinal product” in the EEA are similar in principle to those in the United States. In the EEA a medicinal product may be designated as orphan if (1) it is intended for the diagnosis, prevention or treatment of a life-threatening or chronically debilitating condition; (2) either (a) such condition affects no more than five in 10,000 persons in the EU when the application is made, or (b) the product, without the benefits derived from orphan status, would not generate sufficient return in the EU to justify investment; and (3) there exists no satisfactory method of diagnosis, prevention or treatment of such condition authorized for marketing in the EU, or if such a method exists, the product will be of significant benefit to those affected by the condition. Orphan medicinal products are eligible for financial incentives such as reduction of fees or fee waivers and are, upon grant of a marketing authorization, entitled to ten years of market exclusivity for the approved therapeutic indication. During this ten-year orphan market exclusivity period, no marketing authorization application shall be accepted, and no marketing authorization shall be granted for a similar medicinal product for the same indication. An orphan product can also obtain an additional two years of market exclusivity in the EU for pediatric studies. The ten-year market exclusivity may be reduced to six years if, at the end of the fifth year, it is established that the product no longer meets the criteria for orphan designation, for example, if the product is sufficiently profitable not to justify maintenance of market exclusivity. Additionally, marketing authorization may be granted to a similar product for the same indication at any time if (i) the second applicant can establish that its product, although similar, is safer, more effective or otherwise clinically superior; (ii) the applicant consents to a second orphan medicinal product application; or (iii) the applicant cannot supply enough orphan medicinal product.

Similar to the United States, the various phases of non-clinical and clinical research in the European Union are subject to significant regulatory controls. The Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC, the Directive 2005/28/EC on GCP and the related national implementing provisions of the individual EU Member States govern the system for the approval of clinical trials in the European Union. Under this system, an applicant must obtain prior approval from the competent national authority of the EU Member States in which the clinical trial is to be conducted. Furthermore, the applicant may only start a clinical trial at a specific study site after the competent ethics committee has issued a favorable opinion. The clinical trial application must be accompanied by, among other documents, an investigational medicinal product dossier (the Common Technical Document) with supporting information prescribed by Directive 2001/20/ EC, Directive 2005/28/EC, where relevant the implementing national provisions of the individual EU Member States and further detailed in applicable guidance documents.

In April 2014, the European Union adopted a new Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No 536/2014, which is set to replace the Clinical Trials Directive 2001/20/EC and will overhaul the current system of approvals for clinical trials in the European Union. Specifically, the new regulation, which will be directly applicable in all Member States (meaning that no national implementing legislation in each European Union Member State is required), aims at simplifying and streamlining the approval of clinical trials in the European Union. For instance, the new Clinical Trials Regulation provides for a streamlined application procedure via a single entry point and strictly defined deadlines for the assessment of clinical trial applications. It is expected that the new Clinical Trials Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 will come into effect following confirmation of full functionality of the Clinical Trials Information System, the centralized European Union portal and database for clinical trials foreseen by the new Clinical Trials regulation, through an independent audit, which is currently expected to occur in December 2021.

In addition, the collection, use, storage, disclosure, transfer, or other processing of personal data regarding individuals in the EEA, including personal health data, is subject to the General Data Protection Regulation 2016/679 (“GDPR”), which became effective on May 25, 2018. The GDPR is wide-ranging in scope and imposes numerous requirements on companies that process personal data, including requirements relating to processing health and other sensitive data, obtaining consent of the individuals to whom the personal data relates, providing information to individuals regarding data processing activities, implementing safeguards to protect the security and confidentiality of personal data, providing notification of data breaches, and taking certain measures when engaging third-party processors. The GDPR also imposes strict rules on the transfer of personal data to countries outside the European Union, including the United States, and permits data protection authorities to impose large penalties for violations of the GDPR, including potential fines of up to €20 million or 4% of annual global revenues, whichever is greater. The GDPR also confers a private right of action on data subjects and consumer associations to lodge complaints with supervisory authorities, seek judicial remedies, and obtain compensation for damages resulting from violations of the GDPR. In addition, the GDPR includes restrictions on cross-border data transfers. Compliance with the GDPR will be a rigorous and time-intensive process that may increase our cost of doing business or require us to change our business practices, and despite those efforts, there is a risk that we may be subject to fines and penalties, litigation, and reputational harm in connection with our European activities.

There is significant uncertainty related to the manner in which data protection authorities will seek to enforce compliance with GDPR. Additionally, if we utilize third party distributors, compliance with such foreign governmental regulations would generally be the responsibility of such distributors, who may be independent contractors over whom we have limited control.

Outside the United States, ensuring coverage and adequate payment for a product also involves challenges. Pricing of prescription pharmaceuticals is subject to government control in many countries. Pricing negotiations with government authorities can extend well beyond the receipt of regulatory approval for a product and may require a clinical trial that compares the cost-effectiveness of a product to other available therapies. The conduct of such a clinical trial could be expensive and result in delays in commercialization.

In the European Union, pricing and reimbursement schemes vary widely from country to country. Some countries provide that products may be marketed only after a reimbursement price has been agreed. Some countries may require the completion of additional studies that compare the cost-effectiveness of a particular product candidate to currently available therapies or so-called health technology assessments, in order to obtain reimbursement or pricing approval. For example, the European Union provides options for its member states to restrict the range of products for which their national health insurance systems provide reimbursement and to control the prices of medicinal products for human use. European Union member states may approve a specific price for a product or it may instead adopt a system of direct or indirect controls on the profitability of the company placing the product on the market. Other member states allow companies to fix their own prices for products, but monitor and control prescription volumes and issue guidance to physicians to limit prescriptions. Recently, many countries in the European Union have increased the amount of discounts required on pharmaceuticals and these efforts could continue as countries attempt to manage healthcare expenditures, especially in light of the severe fiscal and debt crises experienced by many countries in the European Union. The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription products, has become intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products. Political, economic and regulatory developments may further complicate pricing negotiations, and pricing negotiations may continue after reimbursement has been obtained. Reference pricing used by various European Union member states, and parallel trade, i.e., arbitrage between low-priced and high-priced member states, can further reduce prices. There can be no assurance that any country that has price controls or reimbursement limitations for pharmaceutical products will allow favorable reimbursement and pricing arrangements for any products, if approved in those countries.

On June 23, 2016, the United Kingdom (“UK”) held a referendum in which a majority of voters approved an exit from the EU (“Brexit”). After nearly years of negotiation and political and economic uncertainty, the UK’s withdrawal from the EU became effective on January 31, 2020. There was a transitional period, during which EU laws, including pharmaceutical laws, continued to apply in the UK, however this ended on December 31, 2020. The UK and EU have signed an EU-UK trade and cooperation agreement (EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement), which became provisionally applicable on January 1, 2021 and will become formally applicable once ratified by both the UK and the EU. This agreement provides details on how some aspects of the UK and EU’s relationship regarding medicinal products will operate, particularly in relation to GMP, however there are still many uncertainties. Many of the regulations that now apply in the UK following the transition period (including financial laws and regulations, taxes, intellectual property rights, data protection laws, supply chain logistics, environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, medicine approval and regulations, immigration laws and employment laws), will likely be amended in future as the UK determines its new approach, which may result in significant divergence from EU regulations. This lack of clarity on future UK laws and regulations and their interaction with the EU laws and regulations increases our regulatory burden of operating in and doing business with both the UK and the EU.

The long-term effects of Brexit will depend, in part, on how the EU-UK Trade and Cooperation Agreement, and any future agreements signed by the UK and the EU, take effect in practice. Such a withdrawal from the EU is unprecedented, and it is unclear how the restrictions on the UK’s access to the European single market for goods, capital, services and labor within the EU and the wider commercial, legal and regulatory environment, could impact our current and future operations and clinical activities in the UK.

We may also face new regulatory costs and challenges that could have an adverse effect on our operations as a result of Brexit. Since the regulatory framework in the UK covering quality, safety and efficacy of medicinal products, clinical trials, marketing authorization, commercial sales and distribution of medicinal products is derived from EU directives and regulations, Brexit could materially impact the future regulatory regime with respect to the approval of any of our product candidate or future product candidates in the UK. For instance, the UK will now no longer be covered by the centralized procedure for obtaining EEA- wide marketing and manufacturing authorizations from the EMA for medicinal products and a separate process for authorization of drug products will be required in the UK. For a period of two years from January 1, 2021, the MHRA may rely on a decision taken by the European Commission on the approval of a new marketing authorization in the centralized procedure, in order to more quickly grant a UK marketing authorization, however a separate application will still be required. Any delay in obtaining, or an inability to obtain, any regulatory approvals, as a result of Brexit or otherwise, would delay or prevent us from commercializing our current or future product candidates in the UK and could restrict our ability to generate revenue from that market.

We expect that, now the transition period has expired, Brexit could lead to legal uncertainty and potentially divergent national laws and regulations as the UK determines which EU laws to replicate or replace, including those related to the regulation of medicinal products. Any of these effects of Brexit, and others we cannot anticipate, could negatively impact our business and results of operations in the UK.

The uncertainty concerning the UK’s legal, political and economic relationship with the EU following Brexit may also be a source of instability in the international markets, create significant currency fluctuations, and/or otherwise adversely affect trading agreements or similar cross-border co-operation arrangements (whether economic, tax, fiscal, legal, regulatory or otherwise).

As of June 30, 2022, we had 10 full-time employees. Additionally, we have retained and may retain in the future, a number of expert consultants and vendors that help navigate us through and execute the different aspects of our business. We consider our relationship with our employees to be good and have not experienced any work stoppages, slowdowns or other serious labor problems that have materially impeded our business operations. None of our employees are represented by labor unions or covered by collective bargaining agreements.

Our human capital management objectives include, as applicable, identifying, recruiting, retaining, incentivizing, and integrating our new and existing employees. The principal purpose of our equity incentive plan is to attract, retain, and motivate selected employees, consultants, and directors through the granting of stock-based compensation awards and cash-based bonus awards.

We believe that our current facilities are adequate for our current needs and that suitable additional or substitute space at commercially reasonable terms will be available as needed to accommodate any future expansion of our operations.

From time to time, we may become involved in legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, the resolution of which we do not anticipate would have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows. However, there is no certainty that any such future litigation that may arise would not have a material financial impact on our business. As of the date of this prospectus, we were not a party to any material legal matters or claims.

The following table sets forth information about our directors, executive officers and other senior management as of June 30, 2022.

The following table sets forth certain information about our directors and executive officers.

Ron Bentsur (56), Co-Founder, Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President of Nuvectis, has over 20 years of senior leadership experience in the biotechnology industry. He served as CEO of UroGen Pharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: URGN) from August 2015 until January 2019, and as CEO of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: KERX, acquired by Akebia Therapeutics) from May 2009 until May 2015. At UroGen and Keryx, Mr. Bentsur led the clinical development, regulatory approvals and the commercial infrastructure buildouts for the US commercial launches of Jelmyto and Auryxia, respectively. Mr. Bentsur also led the establishment of a successful worldwide partnership for an earlier-stage program at UroGen and an ex-US development partnership for Auryxia at Keryx. Mr. Bentsur served as CEO of XTL Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: XTLB) from January 2006 until April 2009 and as Investor Relations and CFO of Keryx from October 2000 until January 2006. Mr. Bentsur worked as an investment banker in NYC and Tel Aviv, Israel, from 1994 until 2000. Mr. Bentsur served as a member of the Board of Directors of Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. from 2009 through the approval and launch of Elzonris® and through the subsequent acquisition of the company by Menarini in June 2020, and serves on the Board of Directors of Beyond Air, Inc. (NASDAQ: XAIR). Mr. Bentsur holds a BA in Economics and Business Administration with distinction from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel and an MBA (Magna Cum Laude), from New York University’s Stern School of Business. Mr. Bentsur has been selected to serve on our Board of Directors based on his years of experience in the biotechnology industry and extensive management experience.

Enrique Poradosu, PhD (56), Co-Founder, Executive Vice President, Chief Scientific and Business Officer of Nuvectis, has over 20 years of senior scientific leadership experience in the biotechnology industry. From January 2016 until December 2020, he served as SVP, Business and Scientific Strategy at Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: STML, acquired by Menarini in June 2020). At Stemline Dr. Poradosu led the licensing and scientific strategy of the company’s pipeline, as well as directly leading strategic planning and operational execution of the early-stage drug development programs. Prior to that, Dr. Poradosu served as VP Business and Scientific Strategy at Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: KERX), acquired by Akebia Therapeutics (NASDAQ: AKBA)), from 2003 until 2016. From 1998 until 2003, Dr. Poradosu served as a project manager at a private biomedical incubator. Dr. Poradosu holds a BSc in Chemistry and Biology with distinction from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel and a PhD in Biochemistry, from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Shay Shemesh (39), Co-Founder, Executive Vice President, Chief Development Officer of Nuvectis, has over 15 years of multi-disciplinary experience in drug development. From 2015 until 2020, he served as SVP, Clinical and Regulatory Affairs at Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: STML, acquired by Menarini in June 2020) where he led multi-disciplinary development teams in early and late-stage projects. In this role, Mr. Shemesh held responsibilities for the strategic planning and operational execution of the Elzonris^® Biologics License Application, with the FDA and Marketing Authorization Application with EMA, resulting in the approval of Elzonris™ in both regions for the treatment of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm, an orphan hematologic malignancy. Prior to that, Mr. Shemesh was a clinical operations lead at Keryx Biopharmaceuticals (NASDAQ: KERX, acquired by Akebia Therapeutics (NASDAQ: AKBA)), where he managed the late-stage clinical trials for Auryxia™ for the treatment of anemia in patients with non- dialysis CKD, which led to the approval of Auryxia in this indication in the US and the EU. Mr. Shemesh holds a BSc and MSc in Biotechnology from Bar Ilan University in Israel.

Kenneth Hoberman (57), Director, joined our Board of Directors in July 2021. Mr. Hoberman has extensive financial, investor relations, corporate governance, operational, and business development experience including M&A, strategic alliances and partnerships both domestic and international. Mr. Hoberman has served as the Chief Operating Officer of Stemline Therapeutics, Inc. (“Stemline”) since 2013, where he negotiated and closed several licensing agreements and was responsible for multiple vendor contracts. While at Stemline, he helped lead the company from an early-stage drug development company to a fully integrated commercial entity, including through Stemline’s successful initial public offering. Mr. Hoberman directed all Stemline’s functional groups, including manufacturing, commercial, regulatory, R&D, medical affairs, public and investor relations, HR and finance. Mr. Hoberman also led the M&A transaction which resulted in the sale of Stemline to the Menarini Group in June 2020 for approximately $750 million. He was previously Vice President of Corporate and Business Development of Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., where he initiated and executed a Japanese partnership valued at up to $100 million, and originated, negotiated and closed dozens of licensing and operational contracts, including the licensing of Auryxia™, which was approved by the FDA in September 2014. He is on the Board of Directors of TG Therapeutics, Inc. (Nasdaq: TGTX). He received a B.S.B.A. in Finance from Boston University and completed post- baccalaureate studies at Columbia University. Mr. Hoberman has been selected to serve on our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience in the biopharmaceutical industry and in-depth understanding of our business.

Matthew L. Kaplan (54), Director, joined our Board of Directors in September 2021. Mr. Kaplan is an experienced Equity Analyst with deep knowledge in biotechnology, particularly for analysis and advisement of early-stage companies. With 24 years of experience as an Equity Analyst, since 2008, he has been a Managing Director and the Head of Healthcare Equity Research at Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Prior to joining Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., he was a Partner and the Director of Healthcare Research with Punk, Ziegel & Company, a Senior Biotechnology Analyst at Evolution Capital, and a Director of The Life Sciences Group at The Carson Group. Mr. Kaplan has received numerous citations as a top ranked Biotechnology Stock Picker by Thomson Reuters, The Financial Times, and Forbes. Mr. Kaplan also spent six years as a Research Associate with the Albert Einstein College of Medicine / Montefiore Hospital Department of Cardiology, where he co-authored numerous articles on gene regulation in the heart. Mr. Kaplan received his BS in Biology from the University of Michigan.

James F. Oliviero, III (45), Director, joined our Board of Directors in July 2021. Mr. Oliviero has over twenty years of operational experience in the biotechnology industry. Since 2015, Mr. Oliviero has served as the President and Chief Executive Officer of Checkpoint Therapeutics, Inc. (NASDAQ: CKPT), where he has completed over $100 million in private and public financings for the company to date, while designing and overseeing the company’s development programs for its novel immuno-oncology and targeted therapy, a type of cancer treatment that precisely identifies and attacks a specific pathway of cancer cells, product candidates being evaluated for the treatment of several solid tumor cancer indications. Prior to Checkpoint, from May 2003 to September 2015, Mr. Oliviero served in a variety of leadership capacities at Keryx Biopharmaceuticals, Inc., which was subsequently acquired by Akebia. His most recent position at Keryx, beginning in April 2009, was as Chief Financial Officer, responsible for all of the finance, accounting, investor relations, corporate governance and legal matters and was also involved in the clinical and regulatory development of Auryxia^®, which successfully obtained FDA approval in 2014. From August 1999 to May 2003, Mr. Oliviero was Director of Finance for ACCESS Oncology, Inc., a privately held biotechnology company. Mr. Oliviero began his professional career as an investment banker at Furman Selz LLC in New York City. Mr. Oliviero is a CFA charterholder and holds a B.B.A. in Finance with Highest Distinction from Emory University’s Goizueta Business School. Mr. Oliviero has been selected to serve on our Board of Directors based on his extensive experience in the biotechnology industry and in-depth understanding of our business.

Our executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the discretion of, our board of directors. There are no family relationships among any of our directors or executive officers.

Our bylaws provide that our board of directors shall consist of between one and nine directors, which number shall be fixed from time to time by resolution of our board of directors. Currently our board of directors consists of Ron Bentsur, Kenneth Hoberman, James Oliviero, and Matthew Kaplan.

Our bylaws also provide that our directors may be removed with or without cause by the affirmative vote of the holders of at least two-thirds of the votes that all our stockholders would be entitled to cast in an annual election of directors.

Our current and future executive officers and significant employees serve at the discretion of our Board. Our Board may also choose to form certain committees, such as a compensation committee and an audit committee.

Our board of directors has determined that Kenneth Hoberman, Matthew Kaplan and James Oliviero are independent directors. In making this determination, our board of directors applied the standards set forth in the rules of Nasdaq and in Rule 10A-3 under the Exchange Act. Our board of directors considered all relevant facts and circumstances known to it in evaluating the independence of these directors, including their current and historical employment, any compensation we have given to them, any transactions we have with them, their beneficial ownership of our capital stock, their ability to exert control over us, all other material relationships they have had with us and the same facts with respect to their immediate families.

Although there is no specific policy regarding diversity in identifying director nominees, the board of directors seek the talents and backgrounds that would be most helpful to us in selecting director nominees.

Mr. Ron Bentsur, our Chief Executive Officer, is also the Chairman of our board of directors. Our corporate governance guidelines provide our board of directors with flexibility to select the appropriate leadership structure at a particular time based on what our board of directors determines to be in the best interests of the Company. Our board of directors determined that, at the present time, having our Chief Executive Officer also serve as the Chairman of our board of directors provides us with optimally effective leadership and is in our best interests and those of our stockholders. Twenty years of management experience in our industry as well as his extensive understanding of our business, operations, and strategy make him well qualified to serve as chairman of our board.

Risk assessment and oversight are an integral part of our governance and management processes. Our board of directors encourages management to promote a culture that incorporates risk management into our corporate strategy and day-to-day business operations. Management discusses strategic and operational risks at regular management meetings and conducts specific strategic planning and review sessions during the year that include a focused discussion and analysis of the risks facing us. Throughout the year, senior management reviews these risks with the board of directors at regular board meetings as part of management presentations that focus on particular business functions, operations or strategies, and presents the steps taken by management to mitigate or eliminate such risks.

Our board of directors will not have a standing risk management committee, but will rather administer this oversight function directly through our board of directors as a whole, as well as through various standing committees of our board of directors that address risks inherent in their respective areas of oversight. In particular, our board of directors is responsible for monitoring and assessing strategic risk exposure. Our audit committee will coordinate the board of director’s oversight of our internal control over financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures, related-party transactions and code of conduct and corporate governance guidelines. Our compensation committee will assess and monitor whether any of our compensation policies and programs has the potential to encourage excessive risk-taking as well as succession planning as it relates to our Chief Executive Officer. While each committee will be responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, our entire board of directors will be regularly informed through committee reports about such risks.

Our board of directors has established an audit committee and compensation committee, each of which will operate pursuant to a charter adopted by our board of directors. Our board of directors may also establish other committees from time to time to assist the management of our business. The composition and functions of each committee are described below. Members serve on these committees until their resignation or until otherwise determined by our board of directors. Each committee has adopted a written charter that satisfies the applicable rules and regulations of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the SEC and Nasdaq Listing Rules, which we have posted on our website at www.nuvectis.com.

Our audit committee consists of Kenneth Hoberman, Matthew Kaplan and James Oliviero, with James Oliviero serving as chair. Our board of directors has determined that each member of the audit committee has sufficient knowledge in financial and auditing matters to serve on the Audit Committee. Our board of directors has determined James Oliviero qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under the applicable rules of the SEC. In making this determination, our board has considered prior experience, business acumen and independence. The audit committee’s responsibilities include:

Our compensation committee consists of Kenneth Hoberman, Matthew Kaplan and James Oliviero, with Kenneth Hoberman serving as chair. Our board of directors has determined that each of the members of our compensation committee is a non-employee director, as defined in Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act, and satisfies the Nasdaq independence requirements. The functions of this committee include, among other things:

We believe that the composition and functioning of our compensation committee complies with all applicable requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and all applicable SEC and Nasdaq rules and regulations. We intend to comply with future requirements to the extent they become applicable to us.

Our board of directors does not currently have a nominating and corporate governance committee or other committee performing a similar function, nor do we have any formal written policies outlining the factors and process relating to the selection of nominees for consideration for membership on our board of directors by our directors or our stockholders. Our board of directors has adopted resolutions in accordance with the rules of The Nasdaq Stock Market authorizing a majority of our independent members to recommend qualified director nominees for consideration by the board of directors. Our board of directors believes that it is appropriate for us to not have a standing nominating and corporate governance committee because of a number of factors, including the number of independent members who want to participate in consideration of candidates for membership on our board of directors and in matters that relate to the corporate governance of our company. Our board of directors consists of four members, three of whom are independent. Our board of directors considered forming a nominating and corporate governance committee consisting of several of the independent members of our board of directors. Forming a committee consisting of less than all of the independent members was unattractive because it would have omitted the other independent members of our board of directors who wanted to participate in considering qualified candidates for board membership and to have input on corporate governance matters related to our company. Since our board of directors desired the participation in the nominations process of all of its independent directors, it therefore decided not to form a nominating and corporate governance committee and instead authorized a majority of the independent members of our board of directors to make and consider nominations for membership to our board of directors. The independent members of our board of directors do not have a nominating and corporate governance committee charter, but act pursuant to board of director resolutions as described above. Each of the members of our board of directors authorized to recommend director nominees is independent within the meaning of the current “independent director” standards established by The Nasdaq Stock Market rules. Our board of directors intends to review this matter periodically, and may in the future elect to designate a formal nominating and corporate governance committee.

None of our current or former executive officers serve as a member of the compensation committee. None of our officers serve, or have served during the last completed fiscal year, on the board of directors or compensation committee, or other committee serving an equivalent function, of any other entity that has one or more of its executive officers serving as a member of our board of directors or our compensation committee. For a description of transactions between us and members of our compensation committee and affiliates of such members, please see “Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions.”

We have adopted a written code of business conduct, that applies to our directors, officers and employees, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, principal accounting officer or controller, or persons performing similar functions. A copy of the code is posted on our website at www.nuvectis.com.

Our directors receive an annual cash retainer of $40,000, payable in quarterly installments on the last day of each calendar quarter, with prorated payment for any partial quarters. Each member of the Compensation Committee and Audit Committee also receives an additional $5,000 annual fee for membership on each committee, with the Chairs of the Audit and Compensation Committees receiving $15,000, payable in quarterly installments on the last day of each calendar quarter, with prorated payment for any partial quarters. Directors also received (i) an initial equity grant of 29,250 options to purchase our Common Stock, with an exercise price of $3.05 per option and (ii) annual option grants valued at approximately $150,000. All option grants will vest in 3 years, with 1/3 of the granted options of each grant vesting on the first, second and third anniversaries of the date of such grant. respectively. The Board has full discretion with respect to the annual grants.

The following are our employment arrangements with our executive officers as of the end of our most recently completed fiscal year:

Mr. Bentsur’s annual base salary is $575,000 per annum, paid monthly in equal installments, which commenced on the consummation of our initial public offering. On an annual basis, as of the first of January following the Company’s initial public offering, and in any event on each January 1 thereafter, the amount of Mr. Bentsur’s salary shall be increased by no less than the greater of (1) the amount determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee, or (2) the relevant consumer price index (“CPI”). Mr. Bentsur did not receive any cash compensation in 2021.

Mr. Bentsur’s annual bonus target will be 75% of his annual base salary, based on the achievement of corporate goals & objectives, paid no later than March 15 following such bonus performance calendar year period. The Board or Compensation Committee shall have the discretion to pay Mr. Bentsur an annual performance bonus in excess of the target for performance exceeding goals, which bonus may be awarded without proration in the event of a partial contract year.

Mr. Bentsur will be eligible for grants of equity awards under the Company’s long-term equity incentive plan. On the Effective Date, the Company shall award the following to the Mr. Bentsur:

In the event that Mr. Bentsur is terminated without Cause, for Good Reason, Change of Control, Death or Disability, as each such term is defined in Mr. Bentsur’s employment agreement, all unvested shares of restricted stock and options shall be immediately accelerated and become fully vested and unrestricted/ exercisable. Upon termination for Cause, all unvested shares of restricted shock shall expire and terminate.

If Mr. Bentsur resigns for Good Reason or is terminated due to Death or Disability, Change of Control, or otherwise terminated without Cause, then Mr. Bentsur or his estate or beneficiaries, in the case of Death or Disability, will receive a one-time payment equal to two years of Mr. Bentsur’s then annual base salary, plus a bonus payment equal to the annual bonus earned in the preceding year (if not already paid), the pro rata portion of the target bonus earned in the current year, benefits and expense reimbursement due to Mr. Bentsur, payment in lieu of any accrued but unused vacation time, payment of any unreimbursed expenses, and continued coverage through the longest applicable limitations period under the Company’s directors and officers insurance policies, all such payments to be made within 60 (sixty) days of the date of termination.

Notwithstanding the above the Company may terminate Mr. Bentsur’s employment hereunder at any time, immediately, for Cause, upon written notice to Mr. Bentsur. If Mr. Bentsur’s employment is terminated for Cause, he shall be entitled to receive (i) the unpaid portion of his base salary then in effect accrued through the effective date of the termination of his employment hereunder, and (ii) payment for any unused vacation days which have accrued through the effective date of the termination of Mr. Bentsur’s employment, in each case to be paid within 30 (thirty) days after such effective date.

In the event that a “Transaction” (as such term is defined in the Company’s Global Equity Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time, or a successor plan) occurs during Mr. Bentsur’s employment, regardless of whether Mr. Bentsur’s employment is terminated, Mr. Bentsur shall receive payment of the termination benefits described above as if his employment had been terminated on the effective date of the Transaction. Following the Transaction, Mr. Bentsur shall not be entitled to receive such termination benefits upon a future termination of his employment; provided that he shall remain eligible to receive (i) any accrued benefits upon any such subsequent termination, and (ii) cash payments, paid in periodic installments in accordance with the Company’s usual payroll practices, for a period of 18 months, equal to the cost the Company would have incurred had Mr. Bentsur continued group medical, dental, vision and/or prescription drug benefit coverage for himself and/or his eligible dependents under any Company sponsored group health plan covering Mr. Bentsur and his eligible dependents at the time of the termination of employment.

Mr. Poradosu’s annual base salary is $400,000 per annum, paid monthly in equal installments, which commenced on the consummation of our initial public offering. On an annual basis, as of the first January following the Company’s initial public offering, and in any event on each January 1 thereafter, the amount of Mr. Poradosu’s salary shall be increased by no less than the greater of (1) the amount determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee, or (2) the relevant CPI.

Mr. Poradosu’s annual bonus target shall be 50% of the annual base salary, based on the achievement of corporate goals & objectives, paid no later than March 15 following such bonus performance calendar year period. The Board or Compensation Committee shall have the discretion to pay Mr. Poradosu an annual performance bonus in excess of the target for performance exceeding goals, which bonus may be awarded without proration in the event of a partial contract year.

Mr. Poradosu will be eligible for grants of equity awards under the Company’s long-term equity incentive plan. On the Effective Date, the Company shall award the following to the Mr. Poradosu:

In the event that Mr. Poradosu’s is terminated without Cause, for Good Reason, Change of Control, Death or Disability (as such terms are defined in Mr. Poradosu’s employment agreement) all unvested shares of restricted stock and options shall be immediately accelerated and become fully vested and unrestricted/ exercisable. Upon termination for Cause, all unvested shares of restricted shock shall expire and terminate.

If Mr. Poradosu resigns for Good Reason or is terminated due to Death or Disability, Change of Control, or otherwise terminated without Cause, Mr. Poradosu or his estate or beneficiaries, in the case of Death or Disability, will receive a one-time payment equal to two years of Mr. Poradosu’s then annual Base Salary, plus a bonus payment equal to Mr. Poradosu’s annual bonus earned in the preceding year if not already paid, the pro rata portion of the target bonus earned in the current year, benefits and expense reimbursement due to Mr. Poradosu, payment in lieu of any accrued but unused vacation time, payment of any unreimbursed expenses, and continued coverage through the longest applicable limitations period under the Company’s directors and officers insurance policies, all such payments to be made within 60 (sixty) days of the date of termination.

Notwithstanding the above the Company may terminate Mr. Poradosu’s employment hereunder at any time, immediately, for Cause, upon written notice to Mr. Poradosu. If Mr. Poradosu’s employment is terminated for Cause, he shall be entitled to receive (i) the unpaid portion of his base salary then in effect accrued through the effective date of the termination of his employment hereunder, and (ii) payment for any unused vacation days which have accrued through the effective date of the termination of his employment, in each case to be paid within 30 (thirty) days after such effective date.

In the event that a “Transaction” (as such term is defined in the Company’s Global Equity Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time, or a successor plan) occurs during Mr. Poradosu’s employment, regardless of whether Mr. Poradosu’s employment is terminated, Mr. Poradosu shall receive payment of the termination benefits described above as if his employment had been terminated on the effective date of the Transaction. Following the Transaction, Mr. Poradosu shall not be entitled to receive such termination benefits upon a future termination of his employment; provided that he shall remain eligible to receive (i) any accrued benefits upon any such subsequent termination, and (ii) cash payments, paid in periodic installments in accordance with the Company’s usual payroll practices for a period of 18 months, equal to the cost the Company would have incurred had Mr. Poradosu continued group medical, dental, vision and/or prescription drug benefit coverage for himself and/or his eligible dependents under any Company sponsored group health plan covering Mr. Poradosu and his eligible dependents at the time of the termination of employment.

Mr. Shemesh’s annual base salary is $400,000 per annum, paid monthly in equal installments which commenced on the consummation of our initial public offering . On an annual basis, as of the first January following the Company’s initial public offering, and in any event on each January 1 thereafter, the amount of the Mr. Shemesh’s Salary shall be increased by no less than the greater of (1) the amount determined by the Company’s Compensation Committee, or (2) the relevant CPI.

Mr. Shemesh’s annual bonus target will be 50% of his annual base salary, based on the achievement of corporate goals & objectives, paid no later than March 15 following such bonus performance calendar year period. The Board or Compensation Committee shall have the discretion to pay the Mr. Shemesh an annual performance bonus in excess of the target for performance exceeding goals, which bonus may be awarded without proration in the event of a partial contract year.

Mr. Shemesh will be eligible for grants of equity awards under the Company’s long-term equity incentive plan. On the Effective Date, the Company shall award the following to the Mr. Shemesh:

In the event that Mr. Shemesh is terminated without Cause, for Good Reason, Change of Control, Death or Disability (as such terms are defined in the employment agreement) all unvested shares of restricted stock and options shall be immediately accelerated and become fully vested and unrestricted/exercisable. Upon termination for Cause, all unvested shares of restricted shock shall expire and terminate.

If Mr. Shemesh resigns for Good Reason or is terminated due to Death or Disability, Change of Control, or otherwise terminated without Cause, then Mr. Shemesh or his estate or beneficiaries, in the case of Death or Disability, will receive a one-time payment equal to two years of Mr. Shemesh’s then annual Base Salary, plus a bonus payment equal to the annual bonus earned in the preceding year if not already paid, the pro rata portion of the target bonus earned in the current year, plus benefits and expense reimbursement due to Mr. Shemesh, payment in lieu of any accrued but unused vacation time, payment of any unreimbursed expenses, and continued coverage through the longest applicable limitations period under the Company’s directors and officers insurance policies, all such payments to be made within 60 (sixty) days of the date of termination.

Notwithstanding the above the Company may terminate Mr. Shemesh’s employment hereunder at any time, immediately, for Cause, upon written notice to Mr. Shemesh. If Mr. Shemesh’s employment is terminated for Cause, he shall be entitled to receive (i) the unpaid portion of his base salary then in effect accrued through the effective date of the termination of his employment hereunder, and (ii) payment for any unused vacation days which have accrued through the effective date of the termination of his employment, in each case to be paid within 30 (thirty) days after such effective date.

In the event that a “Transaction” (as such term is defined in the Company’s Global Equity Incentive Plan, as amended from time to time, or a successor plan) occurs during Mr. Shemesh’s employment, regardless of whether Mr. Shemesh’s employment is terminated, Mr. Shemesh shall receive payment of the termination benefits described above as if his employment had been terminated on the effective date of the Transaction. Following the Transaction, Mr. Shemesh shall not be entitled to receive such termination benefits upon a future termination of his employment; provided that he shall remain eligible to receive (i) any accrued benefits upon any such subsequent termination and (ii) cash payments, paid in periodic installments in accordance with the Company’s usual payroll practices for a period of 18 months, equal to the cost the Company would have incurred had Mr. Shemesh continued group medical, dental, vision and/or prescription drug benefit coverage for himself and/or his eligible dependents under any Company sponsored group health plan covering Mr. Shemesh and his eligible dependents at the time of the termination of employment.

We do not maintain any deferred compensation, retirement, pension or profit-sharing plans. Our Board of Directors has adopted an incentive plan, the material terms of which are described below, allowing for the grant of equity and cash-based awards to our employees and directors.

On May 23, 2021 (the “Effective Date”), our Board of Directors (the “Board”) adopted the Centry Pharma, Inc. Global Equity Incentive Plan (the “2021 Plan”), which will continue in effect for ten years from the Effective Date. The material terms of the 2021 Plan are described below. The 2021 Plan will be administered by the Board of Directors or a designated committee thereof (as applicable, the “Administrator”), as further described below.

Purpose. The purpose of the 2021 Plan is to attract and retain the best available personnel for, to provide incentives to service providers of the Company (“Service Providers”), and to promote the Company’s business by strengthening the common interest between such individuals and the Company’s stockholders.

Awards. The Administrator may grant any combination of equity awards eligible under the 2021 Plan (an “Award”), as discussed below. The Administrator will determine the details of any such grant, including the timing, the number of shares, the purchase price, time for forfeiture, the vesting schedule, and any acceleration rights thereto. The Administrator may condition any Award on the attainment of performance targets or any other factor that the Administrator may deem appropriate. Unless otherwise permitted by

the Administrator, no Participant may sell, assign, transfer, pledge, hypothecate, or otherwise dispose of any Award, except by will or pursuant to the laws of intestacy. The Company may, at its discretion, impose as a condition of any Award that the Participant grant an individual designated by the Company an irrevocable proxy to vote all shares subject to the Participant’s Award at any general meeting of the Company’s stockholders.

Permissible Awards. The 2021 Plan authorizes awards in any of the following forms:

Adjustments. A Participant’s right to purchase shares under the 2021 Plan will be adjusted upon the occurrence of certain events, as described below.

Cancellation of Awards. If the Board of Directors determines in good faith that, in the context of a Transaction or Liquidation, certain Awards have no monetary value and the holders of such Awards are not entitled to any consideration under the terms of the Transaction or liquidation, the Board of Directors may terminate the Awards. Further, in connection with a Transaction or liquidation, the Board of Directors may terminate any Award, effective as of the effective date of the Transaction or Liquidation, that has an exercise price that is greater than fair market value at the time of such Transaction or Liquidation, without any consideration to the holder thereof.

Through December 31, 2021 we granted 81,003 warrants to service providers with a weighted average exercise price of $3.05. Of these warrants, all are fully vested.

Through December 31, 2021 we granted 226,590 options to service providers with a weighted average exercise price of $3.05. Of these options, none are fully vested.

The following discussion is limited to a summary of the U.S. federal income tax provisions relating to the grant, exercise, vesting and settlement of awards under the 2021 Plan and the subsequent sale of common stock acquired under the Global Equity Incentive Plan. The tax consequences of awards may vary depending upon the particular circumstances, and it should be noted that the income tax laws, regulations and interpretations thereof change frequently. This discussion is intended for general information only and does not purport to be a complete analysis of all of the potential tax effects of the 2021 Plan. Additional taxes, including state, local, and foreign taxes, may apply and may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. There typically will be no U.S. federal income tax consequences to the optionee or to us upon the grant of a non-qualified stock option under the Global Equity Incentive Plan. When the optionee exercises a non-qualified option, however, he or she will recognize ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of our common stock received upon exercise of the option at the time of exercise over the exercise price, and we will typically be allowed a corresponding U.S. federal income tax deduction. Any gain that the optionee realizes when he or she later sells or disposes of the option shares will be short-term or long-term capital gain, depending on how long the shares were held.

Incentive Stock Options. There typically will be no U.S. federal income tax consequences to the optionee or to us upon the grant or exercise of an incentive stock option. If the optionee holds the acquired option shares for the required holding period of at least two years after the date the option was granted and one year after exercise, the difference between the exercise price and the amount realized upon sale or disposition of the option shares will be long-term capital gain or loss, and we will not be entitled to a U.S. federal income tax deduction on such amount. If the optionee disposes of the option shares in a sale, exchange, or other disqualifying disposition before the required holding period ends, he or she will recognize taxable ordinary income in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the option shares at the time of exercise (or, if less, the amount realized on the disposition of the shares) over the exercise price, and we would typically be allowed a U.S. federal income tax deduction equal to such amount. While the exercise of an incentive stock option does not result in current taxable income, the excess of the fair market value of the option shares at the time of exercise over the exercise price will be an item of adjustment for purposes of determining the optionee’s alternative minimum taxable income.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant receiving a stock appreciation right typically will not recognize income, and we will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time the award is granted. When the participant exercises the stock appreciation right, the amount of cash and the fair market value of any shares of our common stock received will be ordinary income to the participant and we will typically be allowed a corresponding U.S. federal income tax deduction at that time.

Restricted Stock. Unless a participant makes an election to accelerate recognition of income to the date of grant as described below, the participant will not recognize income, and we will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time a restricted stock award is granted, provided that the award is nontransferable and is subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. When the restrictions lapse, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of our common stock as of that date (less any amount he or she paid for the stock), and we will typically be allowed a corresponding U.S. federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to limitations in certain circumstances. If the participant files an election under Code Section 83(b) within 30 days after the date of grant of the restricted stock, he or she will recognize ordinary income as of the date of grant equal to the fair market value of the stock as of that date (less any amount paid for the stock), and we will typically be allowed a corresponding U.S. federal income tax deduction, subject to limitations in certain circumstances at that time. Any future appreciation in the stock will be taxable to the participant at capital gains rates. However, if the stock is later forfeited, the participant will not be able to recover the tax previously paid pursuant to the Section 83(b) election.

Restricted Stock Units. A participant typically will not recognize income, and we will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time a restricted stock unit award is granted. When the participant receives shares of our common stock (or the equivalent value in cash or other property) in settlement of a restricted stock unit award, a participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the fair market value of our common stock or other property as of that date (less any amount he or she paid for the stock or property), and we will typically be allowed a corresponding U.S. federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to limitations in certain circumstances.

Cash-Based Performance Awards. A participant will not recognize income, and we will not be allowed a tax deduction, at the time a cash-based performance award is granted (for example, when the performance goals are established). Upon receipt of cash in settlement of the award, the participant will recognize ordinary income equal to the cash received, and we will typically be allowed a corresponding U.S. federal income tax deduction at that time, subject to limitations in certain circumstances.

Section 409A. The 2021 Plan permits the grant of various types of incentive awards, which may or may not be exempt from Code Section 409A. If an award is subject to Section 409A, and if the requirements of Section 409A are not met, the taxable events as described above could apply earlier than described, and could result in the imposition of additional taxes and penalties. Restricted stock awards, and stock options and SARs that comply with the terms of the Global Equity Incentive Plan, are generally exempt from the application of Section 409A. Stock units, other stock-based awards and cash-based awards that are granted in one year and payable in a later year generally are subject to Section 409A unless they are designed to satisfy the short-term deferral exemption from such law. If not exempt, such awards must be specially designed to meet the requirements of Section 409A in order to avoid early taxation and penalties.

Tax Withholding. We have the right to deduct or withhold, or require a participant to remit to us, an amount sufficient to satisfy federal, state and local taxes (including employment taxes) required by law to be withheld with respect to any exercise, lapse of restriction or other taxable event arising as a result of the Global Equity Incentive Plan.

The following table sets forth information with respect to the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of June 30, 2022, and as adjusted to reflect the sale of our common stock offered by us in this offering, for:

We have determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC, which generally means that a person has beneficial ownership of a security if he or she possesses sole or shared voting or investment power of that security, including options or warrants that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of June 30, 2022. Unless otherwise indicated, to our knowledge, the persons and entities named in the table below have sole voting and sole investment power with respect to all shares that they beneficially own, subject to community property laws where applicable. The information in the table below does not necessarily indicate beneficial ownership for any other purpose, including for purposes of Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Securities Act.

Unless otherwise indicated, the address of each beneficial owner listed in the table below is c/o Nuvectis Pharma, Inc., 1 Bridge Plaza, Fort Lee, NJ 07024.

Since inception, we have not been involved in a transaction or series of similar transactions that:

Upon the consummation of our initial public offering, our board of directors adopted a written related person transaction policy, setting forth the policies and procedures for the review and approval or ratification of related person transactions. This policy covers, with certain exceptions set forth in Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act, any transaction, arrangement or relationship, or any series of similar transactions, arrangements or relationships in which we were or are to be a participant, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000 or 1% of the average of our total assets as of December 31, 2021 and 2020 and a related person had or will have a direct or indirect material interest, including without limitation purchases of goods or services by or from the related person or entities in which the related person has a material interest, indebtedness, guarantees of indebtedness and employment by us of a related person. In reviewing and approving any such transactions, our audit committee is tasked to consider all relevant facts and circumstances, including but not limited to whether the transaction is on terms comparable to those that could be obtained in an arm’s length transaction with an unrelated third party and the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction.

The following descriptions are summaries of the material terms of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws.

Our authorized capital stock consists of 60,000,000 shares of Common Stock, par value $0.00001 per share, and 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.00001 per share, all of which shares of preferred stock are undesignated.

As of June 30, 2022, 12,717,794 shares of our Common Stock were outstanding and held of record by 44 stockholders.

Holders of our Common Stock are entitled to one vote for each share held on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and do not have cumulative voting rights. An election of directors by our stockholders shall be determined by a plurality of the votes cast by the stockholders entitled to vote on the election. Holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive proportionately any dividends as may be declared by our Board of Directors in its sole discretion, subject to any preferential dividend rights of outstanding preferred stock, if any.

In the event of our liquidation or dissolution, the holders of Common Stock are entitled to receive proportionately all assets available for distribution to stockholders after the payment of all debts and other liabilities and subject to the prior rights of any outstanding preferred stock. Holders of Common Stock have no preemptive, subscription, redemption or conversion rights. The rights, preferences and privileges of holders of Common Stock are subject to, and may be adversely affected by, the rights of the holders of shares of any series of preferred stock that we may designate and issue in the future.

Our board of directors has the authority, without further action by our stockholders, to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions thereof. These rights, preferences and privileges could include dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preferences, sinking fund terms and the number of shares constituting, or the designation of, such series, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of Common Stock. The issuance of our preferred stock could adversely affect the voting power of holders of Common Stock and the likelihood that such holders will receive dividend payments and payments upon our liquidation. In addition, the issuance of preferred stock could have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change in control of our company or other corporate action. Immediately after consummation of this offering, no shares of preferred stock will be outstanding, and we have no present plan to issue any shares of preferred stock.

Anti-takeover effects of Delaware law and certain provisions of our certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws include a number of provisions that may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing another party from acquiring control of us and encouraging persons considering unsolicited tender offers or other unilateral takeover proposals to negotiate with our board of directors rather than pursue non-negotiated takeover attempts. These provisions include the items described below.

Our certificate of incorporation provides for the division of our board of directors into three classes serving staggered three-year terms, with one class being elected each year. Our certificate of incorporation also provides that directors may be removed only for cause and then only by the affirmative vote of the holders of two-thirds of the shares then entitled to vote at an election of directors. Furthermore, any vacancy on our board of directors, however occurring, including a vacancy resulting from an increase in the size of our board, may only be filled by the affirmative vote of a majority of our directors then in office even if less than a quorum. The classification of directors, together with the limitations on removal of directors and treatment of vacancies, has the effect of making it more difficult for stockholders to change the composition of our board of directors.

Our certificate of incorporation provides that all stockholder actions are required to be taken by a vote of the stockholders at an annual or special meeting, and that stockholders may not take any action by written consent in lieu of a meeting. This limit may lengthen the amount of time required to take stockholder actions and would prevent the amendment of our bylaws or removal of directors by our stockholders without holding a meeting of stockholders.

Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws provide that only a majority of the members of our board of directors then in office may call special meetings of stockholders and only those matters set forth in the notice of the special meeting may be considered or acted upon at a special meeting of stockholders. Our bylaws limit the business that may be conducted at an annual meeting of stockholders to those matters properly brought before the meeting.

Our bylaws establish advance notice procedures with regard to stockholder proposals relating to the nomination of candidates for election as directors or new business to be brought before meetings of our stockholders. These procedures provide that notice of stockholder proposals must be timely given in writing to our corporate secretary prior to the meeting at which the action is to be taken. Generally, to be timely, notice must be received at our principal executive offices not less than 90 days nor more than 120 days prior to the first anniversary date of the annual meeting for the preceding year. Our bylaws specify the requirements as to form and content of all stockholders’ notices. These requirements may preclude stockholders from bringing matters before the stockholders at an annual or special meeting.

Any amendment of our certificate of incorporation must first be approved by a majority of our board of directors, and if required by law or our certificate of incorporation, must thereafter be approved by two- thirds of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the amendment and two-thirds of the outstanding shares of each class entitled to vote thereon as a class. Our bylaws may be amended by the affirmative vote of a majority of the directors then in office, subject to any limitations set forth in the bylaws; and may also be amended by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the amendment, or, if our board of directors recommends that the stockholders approve the amendment, by the affirmative vote of two-thirds of the outstanding shares entitled to vote on the amendment, in each case voting together as a single class.

Our certificate of incorporation provides for 5,000,000 authorized shares of preferred stock. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of preferred stock may enable our board of directors to discourage an attempt to obtain control of us by means of a merger, tender offer, proxy contest or otherwise. For example, if in the due exercise of its fiduciary obligations, our board of directors were to determine that a takeover proposal is not in the best interests of our stockholders, our board of directors could cause shares of preferred stock to be issued without stockholder approval in one or more private offerings or other transactions that might dilute the voting or other rights of the proposed acquirer or insurgent stockholder or stockholder group. In this regard, our certificate of incorporation grants our board of directors broad power to establish the rights and preferences of authorized and unissued shares of preferred stock. The issuance of shares of preferred stock could decrease the amount of earnings and assets available for distribution to holders of shares of Common Stock. The issuance may also adversely affect the rights and powers, including voting rights, of these holders and may have the effect of delaying, deterring or preventing a change in control of us.

We are subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law. In general, Section 203 prohibits a publicly held Delaware corporation from engaging in a “business combination” with an “interested stockholder” for a three-year period following the time that this stockholder becomes an interested stockholder, unless the business combination is approved in a prescribed manner. Under Section 203, a business combination between a corporation and an interested stockholder is prohibited unless it satisfies one of the following conditions:

In general, Section 203 defines an interested stockholder as any entity or person beneficially owning 15% or more of the outstanding voting stock of the corporation and any entity or person affiliated with or controlling or controlled by the entity or person.

Our amended and restated bylaws provide that the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the exclusive forum for state law claims for (i) any derivative action or proceeding brought on our behalf, (ii) any action asserting a breach of fiduciary duty by one or more of our directors, officers or employees, (iii) any action asserting a claim against us arising pursuant to the Delaware General Corporation Law or (iv) any action asserting a claim against us that is governed by the internal affairs doctrine, in each case subject to the Court of Chancery having personal jurisdiction over the indispensable parties named as defendants therein (the “Delaware Forum Provision”); provided, however, that this forum provision will not apply to any causes of action arising under the Exchange Act or the Securities Act which, unless we consent in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, are required to be brought exclusively in federal district courts of the United States of America in accordance with the 2^nd Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation. In addition, our amended and restated bylaws will provide that any person or entity purchasing or otherwise acquiring any interest in shares of our Common Stock is deemed to have notice of and consented to the Delaware Forum Provision. We recognize that the Delaware Forum Provision in our bylaws may impose additional litigation costs on stockholders in pursuing any such claims, particularly if the stockholders do not reside in or near the State of Delaware.

Additionally, the Delaware Forum Provision may limit our stockholders’ ability to bring a claim in a judicial forum that they find favorable for disputes with us or our directors, officers or employees, which may discourage such lawsuits against us and our directors, officers and employees. The Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware may also reach different judgments or results than would other courts, including courts where a stockholder considering an action may be located or would otherwise choose to bring the action, and such judgments may be more or less favorable to us than our stockholders.

Our Common Stock is listed on Nasdaq Capital Market under the trading symbol “NVCT.”

The Transfer Agent and Registrar for our Common Stock is American Stock Transfer & Trust Company, LLC.

The following is a summary of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences relating to the acquisition, ownership and disposition of our common stock as of the date hereof. Except where noted, this summary deals only with our common stock that is held as a capital asset (within the meaning of Section 1221 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, or the Code, by a “non-U.S. holder” (as defined below).

For purposes of this summary, a “non-U.S. holder” means a beneficial owner of our common stock (other than a partnership or any other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) that is not for U.S. federal income tax purposes any of the following:

This summary is based upon provisions of the Code and Treasury Regulations, administrative rulings and judicial decisions currently in effect, all as of the date hereof and all subject to change at any time, possibly with retroactive effect, or to different interpretation by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). This summary does not address all aspects of U.S. federal taxes and does not address any foreign, state, local or other tax considerations that may be relevant to non-U.S. holders in light of their personal circumstances. In addition, this summary does not represent a detailed description of the U.S. federal income tax consequences applicable to non-U.S. holders that are subject to special treatment under the U.S. federal income tax laws (including a non-U.S. holder that is a United States expatriate, “controlled foreign corporation,” “passive foreign investment company,” “real estate investment trust,” “regulated investment company,” dealer in securities or currencies, financial institution, tax-exempt entity, insurance company, person holding our common stock as part of a hedging, integrated, conversion or constructive sale transaction or a straddle, trader in securities that elects to use a mark-to-market method of accounting, person liable for the alternative minimum tax, person who acquired our common stock as compensation for services, or a partnership or other pass-through entity, or partner in a partnership or beneficial owner of a pass-through entity that holds our common stock for U.S. federal income tax purposes). We cannot provide assurance that a change in law will not alter significantly the tax considerations that we describe in this summary.

If a partnership (or other entity treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes) holds our common stock, the tax treatment of a partner will generally depend upon the status of the partner and the activities of the partnership. Non-U.S. holders that are partners of a partnership holding our common stock should consult their tax advisors.

Non-U.S. holders considering the purchase of our common stock should consult their own tax advisors concerning the particular U.S. federal income and estate tax consequences of the ownership of our common stock, as well as the consequences arising under the laws of any other taxing jurisdiction.

As indicated in the “Dividend Policy” section of this prospectus, we have never paid cash dividends on any of our capital stock and currently intend to retain our future earnings, if any, to fund the development and growth of our business.

In the event that we do make a distribution, distributions paid on our common stock will be treated as dividends to the extent paid out of current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles. If a distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, the excess will be treated as a tax-free return of the non-U.S. holder’s investment, up to such holder’s tax basis in the common stock. Any remaining excess will be treated as capital gain, subject to the tax treatment described below in “Gains on disposition of our common stock.” Dividends paid to a non-U.S. holder of our common stock generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty. However, dividends that are effectively connected with the conduct of a trade or business by the non-U.S. holder within the United States (and, if required by an applicable income tax treaty, are attributable to a United States permanent establishment) are not subject to United States federal withholding tax, provided certain certification and disclosure requirements are satisfied. Instead, such dividends are subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net-income basis in the same manner as if the non-U.S. holder were a “United States person” as defined in the Code. Any such effectively connected dividends received by a foreign corporation may, under certain circumstances, be subject to an additional “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

A non-U.S. holder who wishes to claim the benefit of an applicable treaty rate and avoid backup withholding, as discussed below, for dividends will be required (a) to complete IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E (or other applicable form) and certify under penalty of perjury that it is not a “United States person” as defined in the Code and is eligible for treaty benefits or (b) if the common stock is held through certain foreign intermediaries, to satisfy the relevant certification requirements of applicable Treasury Regulations. Special certification and other requirements apply to certain non-U.S. holders that are pass-through entities rather than corporations or individuals.

A non-U.S. holder eligible for a reduced rate of United States withholding tax pursuant to an income tax treaty may obtain a refund of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for refund with the IRS. Dividend distributions to non-U.S. holders would also be subject to the rules concerning backup withholding and FATCA, as further discussed below.

Subject to the discussions below under the heading “Information reporting and backup withholding” and “FATCA withholding requirements,” any gain realized on the disposition of our common stock by a non-U.S. holder generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax unless:

An individual non-U.S. holder described in the first bullet point immediately above will be subject to tax on the net gain derived from the sale under regular graduated U.S. federal income tax rates. If a non-U.S. holder that is a foreign corporation falls under the first bullet point immediately above, it will be subject to tax on its net gain in the same manner as if it were a “United States person” as defined in the Code and, in addition, may, under certain circumstances, be subject to a branch profits tax equal to 30% of its effectively connected earnings and profits or at such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable income tax treaty.

We believe we have not been and are not currently a “United States real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes; however, no assurance can be given that we are not or will not become one in the future. If, however, we are or become a “United States real property holding corporation,” so long as our common stock continues to be regularly traded on an established securities market, only a non-U.S. holder who holds, or held (at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of disposition or the non-U.S. holder’s holding period) more than 5% of our common stock will be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the disposition of the common stock. No assurance can be given, however, that our common stock will continue to be treated as regularly traded on an established securities market for applicable U.S. federal income tax purposes. Non-U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors about the consequences if we are, or become, a “United States real property holding corporation.”

Information returns are required to be filed with the IRS and reporting the amount of dividends paid to each non-U.S. holder and the tax withheld with respect to such dividends, regardless of whether withholding was required. Copies of the information returns reporting such dividends and withholding may also be made available to the tax authorities in the country in which the non-U.S. holder resides under the provisions of an applicable income tax treaty.

A non-U.S. holder will be subject to backup withholding for dividends paid to it unless it certifies under penalty of perjury that it is not a “United States person” as defined in the Code (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the non-U.S. holder is a “United States person” as defined in the Code), or it otherwise establishes an exemption.

Information reporting and, depending on the circumstances, backup withholding will apply to the proceeds of a sale of our common stock within the United States or conducted through certain United States- related financial intermediaries, unless the non-U.S. holder certifies under penalty of perjury that it is not a

“United States person” as defined in the Code (and the payor does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that the non-U.S. holder is a “United States person” as defined in the Code), or it otherwise establishes an exemption.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules may be allowed as a refund or a credit against a non-U.S. holder’s U.S. federal income tax liability provided the required information is timely furnished to the IRS.

Sections 1471 to 1474 of the Code (such sections, and the Treasury Regulations and administrative guidance issued thereunder, commonly referred to as FATCA) impose a 30% United States withholding tax on certain “withholdable payments” made to a “foreign financial institution” or a “nonfinancial foreign entity.” “Withholdable payments” include payments of dividends and the gross proceeds from a disposition of certain property (such as shares of our common stock), if such disposition occurs after December 31, 2018. In general, if a non-U.S. holder is a “foreign financial institution,” the 30% withholding tax will apply to withholdable payments made to it, unless it enters into an agreement with the United States Department of Treasury to collect and provide substantial information regarding its United States account holders, including certain account holders that are foreign entities with United States owners, and to withhold 30% on certain “passthru payments.” If it is a “non-financial foreign entity,” FATCA also generally will impose a withholding tax of 30% on withholdable payments made to it unless it provides the withholding agent with a certification that it does not have any “substantial United States owners” or a certification identifying its direct and indirect substantial United States owners. Intergovernmental agreements between the United States and a non-U.S. holder’s resident country may modify the foregoing requirements.

Non-U.S. holders should consult their own tax advisors regarding the impact of FATCA on their ownership and disposition of shares of our common stock and the potential applicability of any intergovernmental agreements.

The Common Stock being offered by the Selling Shareholders are those previously issued to the Selling Shareholders, and those issuable to the Selling Shareholders upon exercise of the Investment Options and Pre-Funded Warrants (the “Securities”). For additional information regarding the issuances of those Securities, see “Private Placement of Shares of Common Stock, Preferred Investment Options, and Pre-Funded Warrants.” We are registering the shares of Common Stock in order to permit the Selling Shareholders to offer the shares for resale from time to time. Except for the ownership of the shares of Common Stock and the Securities, the Selling Shareholders have not had any material relationship with us within the past three years.

The table below lists the Selling Shareholders and other information regarding the beneficial ownership of the shares of Common Stock by each of the Selling Shareholders. The second column lists the number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned by each Selling Shareholder, based on its ownership of the shares of Common Stock and Securities, as of August 5, 2022, assuming exercise of the Securities held by the Selling Shareholders on that date, without regard to any limitations on exercises.

The third column lists the shares of Common Stock being offered by this prospectus by the Selling Shareholders.

In accordance with the terms of a registration rights agreement with the Selling Shareholders, this prospectus generally covers the resale of the sum of (i) the number of shares of Common Stock issued to the Selling Shareholders in the “Private Placement of Shares of Common Stock, Preferred Investment Options, and Pre-Funded Warrants” described above and (ii) the maximum number of shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the related Preferred Investment Options and Pre-Funded Warrants, determined as if the outstanding Preferred Investment Options and Pre-Funded Warrants, as applicable, were exercised in full as of the trading day immediately preceding the date this registration statement was initially filed with the SEC, each as of the trading day immediately preceding the applicable date of determination and all subject to adjustment as provided in the registration right agreement, without regard to any limitations on the exercise of the Preferred Investment Options and Pre-Funded Warrants, as applicable. The fourth column assumes the sale of all of the shares offered by the Selling Shareholders pursuant to this prospectus.

Under the terms of the Securities held by Selling Shareholders, a Selling Shareholder may not exercise the Securities to the extent such exercise would cause such Selling Shareholder, together with its affiliates and attribution parties, to beneficially own a number of shares of Common Stock which would exceed 4.99% or 9.99% of our then outstanding Common Stock following such exercise, excluding for purposes of such determination shares of Common Stock issuable upon exercise of the Securities which have not been exercised. The number of shares in the second and fourth columns do not reflect this limitation. The Selling Shareholders may sell all, some or none of their shares in this offering. See “Plan of Distribution.”

(1) All of the Securities that are exercisable for the shares underlying the Securities offered hereby contain certain beneficial ownership limitations, which provide that a holder of the Securities will not have the right to exercise any portion of its Securities if such holder, together with its affiliates and attribution parties, would beneficially own in excess of 4.99% or 9.99%, as applicable, of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise, provided that upon at least 61 days’ prior notice to us, a holder may increase or decrease such limitation up to a maximum of 9.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding (each such limitation, a “Beneficial Ownership Limitation”). Additionally, stockholders may have acquired shares on the open market without the Company’s knowledge that may not be reflected.

(2) Represents shares of common stock issued to the selling stockholders in the private placement and offered hereby

(3) We do not know when or in what amounts a Selling Stockholder may offer shares for sale. The Selling Stockholders might not sell any or might sell all of the shares offered by this prospectus. Because the Selling Stockholders may offer all or some of the shares pursuant to this offering, and because there are currently no agreements, arrangements or understandings with respect to the sale of any of the shares, we cannot estimate the number of the shares that will be held by the Selling Stockholders after completion of the offering. However, for purposes of this table, we have assumed that, after completion of the offering, none of the shares covered by this prospectus will be held by the Selling Stockholders, including common stock issuable upon exercise of the Warrants issued in the Private Placement.

(4) The Selling Stockholder purchased or received the Securities in the ordinary course of business and, at the time of purchase of the securities that are registered for resale, the selling stockholders had no agreements or understanding, directly or indirectly with any person to distribute securities.

(5) Sabby Management, LLC is the investment manager of Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. (“Sabby”) and shares voting and investment power with respect to these shares in this capacity. As manager of Sabby Management, LLC, Hal Mintz also shares voting and investment power on behalf of Sabby. Each of Sabby Management, LLC and Mr. Mintz disclaims beneficial ownership over the securities listed except to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. Includes the 909,091 shares underlying the Pre-Funded Warrants that are not presently exercisable in full as a result of the 4.99% Beneficial Ownership Limitation.

(6) Each of the Selling Stockholders is associated with Wainwright, a registered broker dealer and has a registered address of c/o H.C. Wainwright & Co. 430 Park Ave, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10022, and has sole voting and dispositive power over the securities held. The number of shares beneficially owned prior to this offering consist of shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Placement Agent Investment Options, which were received as compensation for the Private Placement.

Each Selling Shareholder of the securities and any of their pledgees, assignees and successors-in-interest may, from time to time, sell any or all of their securities covered hereby on the Nasdaq Capital Market or any other stock exchange, market or trading facility on which the securities are traded or in private transactions. These sales may be at fixed or negotiated prices. A Selling Shareholder may use any one or more of the following methods when selling securities:

• ordinary brokerage transactions and transactions in which the broker-dealer solicits purchasers;

• block trades in which the broker-dealer will attempt to sell the securities as agent but may position and resell a portion of the block as principal to facilitate the transaction;

• purchases by a broker-dealer as principal and resale by the broker-dealer for its account;

• an exchange distribution in accordance with the rules of the applicable exchange;

• in transactions through broker-dealers that agree with the Selling Shareholders to sell a specified number of such securities at a stipulated price per security;

• through the writing or settlement of options or other hedging transactions, whether through an options exchange or otherwise;

The Selling Shareholders may also sell securities under Rule 144 or any other exemption from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), if available, rather than under this prospectus.

Broker-dealers engaged by the Selling Shareholders may arrange for other brokers-dealers to participate in sales. Broker-dealers may receive commissions or discounts from the Selling Stockholders (or, if any broker-dealer acts as agent for the purchaser of securities, from the purchaser) in amounts to be negotiated, but, except as set forth in a supplement to this Prospectus, in the case of an agency transaction not in excess of a customary brokerage commission in compliance with FINRA Rule 2121; and in the case of a principal transaction a markup or markdown in compliance with FINRA Rule 2121.

In connection with the sale of the securities or interests therein, the Selling Shareholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions, which may in turn engage in short sales of the securities in the course of hedging the positions they assume. The Selling Shareholders may also sell securities short and deliver these securities to close out their short positions, or loan or pledge the securities to broker-dealers that in turn may sell these securities. The Selling Shareholders may also enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions or create one or more derivative securities which require the delivery to such broker-dealer or other financial institution of securities offered by this prospectus, which securities such broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell pursuant to this prospectus (as supplemented or amended to reflect such transaction).

The Selling Shareholders and any broker-dealers or agents that are involved in selling the securities may be deemed to be “underwriters” within the meaning of the Securities Act in connection with such sales. In such event, any commissions received by such broker-dealers or agents and any profit on the resale of the securities purchased by them may be deemed to be underwriting commissions or discounts under the Securities Act. Each Selling Shareholders has informed the Company that it does not have any written or oral agreement or understanding, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the securities.

The Company is required to pay certain fees and expenses incurred by the Company incident to the registration of the securities.

We agreed to keep this prospectus effective until all of the securities have been sold pursuant to this prospectus or Rule 144 under the Securities Act or any other rule of similar effect. The resale securities will be sold only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers if required under applicable state securities laws. In addition, in certain states, the resale securities covered hereby may not be sold unless they have been registered or qualified for sale in the applicable state or an exemption from the registration or qualification requirement is available and is complied with.

Under applicable rules and regulations under the Exchange Act, any person engaged in the distribution of the resale securities may not simultaneously engage in market making activities with respect to the Common Stock for the applicable restricted period, as defined in Regulation M, prior to the commencement of the distribution. In addition, the Selling Stockholders will be subject to applicable provisions of the Exchange Act and the rules and regulations thereunder, including Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of the Common Stock by the Selling Stockholders or any other person. We will make copies of this prospectus available to the Selling Stockholders and have informed them of the need to deliver a copy of this prospectus to each purchaser at or prior to the time of the sale (including by compliance with Rule 172 under the Securities Act).

The validity of the securities offered through this prospectus has been passed on by Alston & Bird LLP, New York City.

The financial statements incorporated in this Prospectus by reference to the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021 have been so incorporated in reliance on the report of Kesselman& Kesselman, Certified Public Accountants (Isr.), a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement on Form S-1 under the Securities Act with respect to the shares of our Common Stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, which constitutes a part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement, some of which is contained in exhibits to the registration statement as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information with respect to us and our Common Stock, we refer you to the registration statement, including the exhibits filed as a part of the registration statement. Statements contained in this prospectus concerning the contents of any contract or any other document are not necessarily complete. If a contract or document has been filed as an exhibit to the registration statement, please see the copy of the contract or document that has been filed. Each statement in this prospectus relating to a contract or document filed as an exhibit is qualified in all respects by the filed exhibit. The SEC maintains a website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information about issuers, like us, that file electronically with the SEC. The address of that website is www.sec.gov.

We also file periodic reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. These periodic reports, proxy statements and other information will be available for inspection at the website of the SEC referred to above. We also maintain a website at www.nuvectis.com where you may access these materials free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC. The information on or that can be accessed through our website is not a part of this prospectus and the inclusion of our website address in this prospectus is an inactive textual reference only.

The SEC allows us to “incorporate by reference” the information we file with them. This means that we can disclose important information to you by referring you to those documents instead of having to repeat the information in this document. The information incorporated by reference is considered to be part of this prospectus, and later information that we file with the SEC will automatically update and supersede this information. We incorporate by reference the documents listed below and any future filings made with the SEC under Sections 13(a), 13(c), 14 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, (1) after the date of the initial registration statement, as amended, and prior to effectiveness of the registration statement, and (2) after the date of this prospectus and prior to the termination of this offering. Such information will automatically update and supersede the information contained in this prospectus and the documents listed below; provided, however, that we are not, unless specifically indicated, incorporating any information furnished under Item 2.02 or Item 7.01 of any current report on Form 8-K, whether listed below or filed in the future, or related exhibits furnished pursuant to Item 9.01 of Form 8-K:

We will provide to each person, including any beneficial owner, to whom a copy of this prospectus is delivered, a copy of any or all of the information that we have incorporated by reference into this prospectus. We will provide this information upon written or oral request at no cost to the requester. You may request this information by contacting our corporate headquarters at the following address: 1 Bridge Plaza, Suite 275, Fort Lee, NJ 07024, Attn: Vice President of Finance, or by calling (201) 614-3150 or at the following email address: ir@nuvectis.com.

The following table sets forth the costs and expenses, other than certain discounts and commissions, payable by the registrant in connection with the sale of our common stock being registered. All amounts are estimates except for the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, registration fee.

Section 145(a) of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or DGCL. provides, in general, that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party, or is threatened to be made a party, to any threatened, pending or completed action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (other than an action by or in the right of the corporation) because that person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or other enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees), judgments, fines and amounts paid in settlement actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with such action, so long as the person acted in good faith and in a manner he or she reasonably believed was in or not opposed to the corporation’s best interests, and, with respect to any criminal action or proceeding, had no reasonable cause to believe his or her conduct was unlawful.

Section 145(b) of the DGCL provides, in general, that a Delaware corporation may indemnify any person who was or is a party, or is threatened to be made a party, to any threatened, pending or completed action or suit by or in the right of the corporation to obtain a judgment in its favor because the person is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or other enterprise. The indemnity may include expenses (including attorneys’ fees) actually and reasonably incurred by the person in connection with the defense or settlement of such action, so long as the person acted in good faith and in a manner the person reasonably believed was in or not opposed to the corporation’s best interests, except that no indemnification shall be permitted without judicial approval if a court has determined that the person is to be liable to the corporation with respect to such claim. Section 145(c) of the DGCL provides that, if a present or former director or officer has been successful in defense of any action referred to in Sections 145(a) and (b) of the DGCL, the corporation must indemnify such officer or director against the expenses (including attorneys’ fees) he or she actually and reasonably incurred in connection with such action.

Section 145(g) of the DGCL provides, in general, that a corporation may purchase and maintain insurance on behalf of any person who is or was a director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation, or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or other enterprise against any liability asserted against and incurred by such person, in any such capacity, or arising out of his or her status as such, whether or not the corporation could indemnify the person against such liability under Section 145 of the DGCL.

As permitted by Section 102 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or the DGCL, we have adopted provisions in our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation that limit the liability of our directors for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties, except for liability that cannot be eliminated under the DGCL. Delaware law provides that directors of a corporation will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for any of the following:

• acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law;

• unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions as provided in Section 174 of the DGCL; or

• any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

This limitation of liability does not apply to liabilities arising under the federal securities laws and does not affect the availability of equitable remedies such as injunctive relief or rescission.

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and our Bylaws also provide that we will indemnify our directors and executive officers and may indemnify our other officers and employees and other agents to the fullest extent permitted by law. We believe that indemnification under our Bylaws covers at least negligence and gross negligence on the part of indemnified parties. Our Bylaws also permit us to secure insurance on behalf of any officer, director, employee or other agent for any liability arising out of his or her actions in this capacity, regardless of whether our Bylaws would permit indemnification. We have secured such insurance.

Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the SEC such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

Since July 27, 2020, we have made the issuances of our unregistered securities described below. Also included is the consideration received by us for such securities and information relating to the section of the Securities Act, or rule of the SEC, under which exemption from registration was claimed.

During June and July 2021, the Company closed an investment agreement with its founders, directors, and certain new investors to issue 128,520 preferred A shares, at a price of approximately $119.05 per share, for a total investment amount of approximately $15.3 million, in which $1.73 million were invested by related parties on the same terms as all other investors. These securities were offered and sold by us in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder in a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.

During July 2022, the Company closed an investment for the issuance and sale in a private placement (the “Private Placement”) of 1,015,598 shares of its common stock, par value $0.00001 (the “Common Stock”) and pre-funded warrants to purchase up to an aggregate of 909,091 shares of Common Stock (the “Pre-Funded Warrants”). The investors in the Private Placement also purchased preferred investment options to purchase up to an aggregate of 1,924,689 shares of Common Stock, and certain designees of H.C. Wainwright & Co., the exclusive placement agent for the Private Placement, also received preferred investment options to purchase up to an aggregate of 115,481 shares of Common Stock (collectively, the “Investment Options”). The Private Placement included a Securities Purchase Agreement, a Preferred Investment Option, a Pre-Funded Warrant, and a Registration Rights Agreement among other documents. Gross proceeds to the Company from the Private Placement are approximately $15.9 million. These securities were offered and sold by us in reliance upon the exemption from the registration requirements provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Rule 506(b) of Regulation D promulgated thereunder in a transaction by an issuer not involving any public offering.

(a) Exhibits. The exhibits to the Registration Statement are listed in the Exhibit Index below and incorporated by reference herein.

(b) The undersigned registrant hereby undertakes that, for purposes of determining any liability under the Securities Act of 1933, each filing of the registrant's annual report pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (and, where applicable, each filing of an employee benefit plan's annual report pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that is incorporated by reference in the registration statement shall be deemed to be a new registration statement relating to the securities offered therein, and the offering of such securities at that time shall be deemed to be the initial bona fide offering thereof.

(h) Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the registrant pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the registrant has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the registrant of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the registrant in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the registrant will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant has duly caused this registration statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Fort Lee, State of New Jersey, on this 15th day of August, 2022.

We, the undersigned directors and/or executive officers of Nuvectis Pharma, Inc., hereby severally constitute and appoint Ron Bentsur, acting singly, his or her true and lawful attorney-in-fact and agent, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign this report and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorney-in-fact and agent full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing necessary or appropriate to be done in connection therewith, as fully for all intents and purposes as he or she might or could do in person, hereby approving, ratifying and confirming all that said attorney-in-fact and agent, or his substitute, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, this registration statement has been signed by the following persons in the capacities held on the dates indicated.

Delaware	2834	86-2405608
(State of incorporation	(Primary Standard Industrial	(I.R.S. Employer
or organization)	Classification Code Number)	Identification Number)

Large accelerated filer	¨	Accelerated filer	¨
Non-accelerated filer	x	Smaller reporting company	x
		Emerging growth company	x

ABOUT THIS PROSPECTUS	ii
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY	1
RISK FACTOR SUMMARY	3
THE OFFERING	6
SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS	7
RISK FACTORS	8
USE OF PROCEEDS	36
DIVIDEND POLICY	37
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	39
BUSINESS	47
MANAGEMENT	84
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION	90
PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS	98
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS	100
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK	101
MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSEQUENCES TO NON-U.S. HOLDERS	105
LEGAL MATTERS	111
EXPERTS	111
WHERE YOU CAN FIND MORE INFORMATION	111
Incorporation of Certain Information by Reference	112

	Three Months Ended June 30
	2022			2021			Change
OPERATING EXPENSES:
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	$	2,505		$	4,245		$	(1,740	)
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE		1,068			1,693			(625	)

OPERATING LOSS		(3,573	)		(5,938	)		2,365
FINANCE INCOME		4			—			4

NET LOSS	$	(3,569	)	$	(5,938	)	$	2,369

	For the three months ended June 30				Increase/
	2022		2021		(Decrease)
Clinical Expense	$	1,144	$	31	$	1,113
Employee Compensation and Benefits		844		667		177
Manufacturing		453		39		414
License Fee		—		3,500		(3,500	)
Professional services and other		64		8		56
Total research and development expenses	$	2,505	$	4,245	$	(1,740	)

	Six Months Ended June 30
	2022			2021			Change
OPERATING EXPENSES:
RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT	$	4,310		$	4,245		$	65
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE		2,208			1,716			492

OPERATING LOSS		(6,518	)		(5,961	)		(557	)
FINANCE INCOME		6			—			6

NET LOSS	$	(6,512	)	$	(5,961	)	$	(551	)

	For the six months ended June 30				Increase/
	2022		2021		(Decrease)
Clinical Expense	$	1,588	$	31	$	1,557
Employee Compensation and Benefits		1,311		667		644
Manufacturing		757		39		718
License Fee		400		3,500		(3,100	)
Professional services and other		254		8		246
Total research and development expenses	$	4,310	$	4,245	$	65

Primary Cancer	ARID1a Mutation			ARID1a Protein Loss
OCCC		53.8	%		64.8	%
Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma		37.6	%		41.8	%
Gastric		15.6	%		25	%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)		13.2	%		27	%
Esophageal		13.3	%		11	%
Pancreatic Cancer		5.7	%		6.7	%
Uterine endometrioid carcinoma		40	%		34.9	%

Indication/Major market	Estimated Annual Incidence		Patients with ARID1a mutation or protein loss
OCCC/US		2,175		1,410
Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma/US		2,175		909
OCCC/EU		3,408		2,210
Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma/EU		3,408		1,425
OCCC/Japan		2,500		1,625
Endometrioid Ovarian Carcinoma/Japan		1,000		375

Indication	Estimated Incidence (US)		Patients with ARID1a protein loss
Gastric cancer		26,550		6,615
Liver		34,000		9,070
Esophageal		19,260		2,120
Urothelial		75,357		25,621
Uterine endometrioid carcinoma		66,570		26,628
Pancreatic		60,430		4,230

Name	Age	Position
Ron Bentsur	56	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President
Enrique Poradosu	56	Executive Vice President, Chief Scientific and Business Officer
Shay Shemesh	39	Executive Vice President, Chief Operations & Development Officer

Kenneth Hoberman	57	Director
Matthew Kaplan	54	Director
James F. Oliviero	45	Director

Name of Beneficial Owner	Number of Shares Beneficially Owned As of June 30, 2022		Percentage of Shares Beneficially Owned As of June 30, 2022
5% and Greater Stockholders:
Charles Mosseri Marlio		1,572,107		12.36	%
Pontifax VI LP(1)		1,379,360		10.85	%
Thomas P. Peters (Bat Sheva M. Gerald)		755,200		5.94	%
Named Executive Officers and Directors:
Ron Bentsur(2)		2,871,555		22.58	%
Enrique Poradosu(3)		1,209,920		9.51	%
Shay Shemesh(4)		1,193,036		9.38	%
Kenneth Hoberman(5)		64,890		*
Matthew Kaplan(6)		35,760		*
James F. Oliviero III(7)		19,578		*
All executive officers and directors as a group (6 persons)		5,394,739		42.42	%

Name of Selling Shareholder	Number of shares of Common Stock Owned Prior to Offering (1)			Maximum Number of shares of Common Stock to be Sold Pursuant to this Prospectus(2)		Number of shares of Common Stock Owned After Offering (3)		Percentage of Beneficial Ownership After Offering (3)
Charles Mosseri Marlio (4)		2,299,381			727,274		1,572,107		12.36	%
Sabby Volatility Warrant Master Fund, Ltd. (4)		1,818,182	(5)		1,818,182		-		--
Thomas Peters (4)		997,626			242,426		755,200		5.16	%
Omri Minin (4)		436,692			109,092		327,600		2.24	%
Eyal Carmon (4)		251,074			87,274		163,800		1.12	%
Ronit Capital SPC – Ronit Capital Fund I SP (4)		363,638			363,638		-		--
Relidano Ltd. (4)		73,000			73,000		-		--
Jacques Mosseri Marlio (4)		72,728			72,728		-		--
Lowenstein Yair Holdings LTD (4)		72,728			72,728		-		--
Susan Mosseri Marlio (4)		72,728			72,728		-		--
Yehoshua Abramovich (4)		50,000			50,000		-		--
Gerarad Mosseri-Marlio Trust 1992 Exempt (4)		43,638			43,638		-		--
Tnuvat Haarava Ltd (4)		32,728			32,728		-		--
Anne Mosseri-Marlio (4)		24,242			24,242		-		--
Donald Wright (4)		18,000			18,000		-		--
David A. Barrett (4)		12,122			12,122		-		--
Jacqueline Mosseri Marlio (4)		12,122			12,122		-		--
Tsorani Yaron (4)		10,910			10,910		-		--
Bar Zorani (4)		6,546			6,546		-		--
Michael Vasinkevich (4)(6)		74,052			74,052		-		--
Noam Rubinstein (4)(6)		25,406			25,406		-		--
James Cappuccio (4)(6)		10,971			10,971		-		--
Craig Schwabe (4)(6)		3,897			3,897		-		--
Charles Worthman (4)(6)		1,155			1,155		-		--

	Amount
SEC registration Fee	$	3,128.70
Legal fees and expenses	$	30,000
Accounting fees and expenses	$	25,000
Total	$	58,128.70

Exhibit Number	Description
5.1	Opinion of Alston & Bird LLP
10.1	Form of Securities Purchase Agreement by and among Nuvectis Pharma, Inc. and the Purchasers, dated July 27, 2022. Filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2022 File No. 001-41264 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.2	Form of Preferred Investment Option filed as Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2022 File No. 001-41264 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.3	Form of Pre-Funded Stock Warrant filed as Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2022 File No. 001-41264 and incorporated herein by reference.
10.4	Form of Registration Rights Agreement by and among Nuvectis Pharma, Inc. and the Purchasers, dated July 27, 2022. Filed as Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrant’s Form 8-K filed on July 29, 2022 File No. 001-41264 and incorporated herein by reference.
23.1	Consent of Kesselman & Kesselman, Certified Public Accountants (Isr.), a member firm of PricewaterhouseCoopers International Limited.
23.2	Consent of Alston & Bird LLP (included in Exhibit 5.1)
24.1	Power of Attorney (included on signature page)
107.1	Filing Fee Table

	Nuvectis Pharma, Inc.

	By:	/s/ Ron Bentsur
	Ron Bentsur
	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President

Signature	Title	Date

/s/ Ron Bentsur	Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President	August 15, 2022
Ron Bentsur	(Principal Executive Officer)

/s/ Michael Carson	Vice President of Finance	August 15, 2022
Michael Carson	(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)

/s/ Kenneth Hoberman	Director	August 15, 2022
Kenneth Hoberman

/s/ James F. Oliviero	Director	August 15, 2022
James F. Oliviero

/s/ Matthew L. Kaplan	Director	August 15, 2022
Matthew L. Kaplan